Fiscal Year 1998 i w .. ~.c' A:Q - -- S :, __.S - c= aS << DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY CIVIL WORKS 108 ARMY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20310-0108 2 3 AUG 1999 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF Honorable Albert Gore, Jr. President of the Senate Washington, D.C. 20510-0010 Dear Mr. President: I am submitting Volume II of the Annual Report on Civil Works Activities for Fiscal Year 1998 in accordance with Section 8 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1888 and Section 925(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. This volume of field reports contains narrative summaries and statistics on water resources development projects of the Army Corps of Engineers where there has been activity between October 1, 1997, and September 30, 1998. Sincerely, seph W. We shal ssistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY CIVIL WORKS 108 ARMY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20310-0108 2 3 AUG 1999 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF Honorable J. Dennis Hastert Speaker of the House Washington, D.C. 20515-6501 Dear Mr. Speaker: I am submitting Volume II of the Annual Report on Civil Works Activities for Fiscal Year 1998 in accordance with Section 8 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1888 and Section 925(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. This volume of field reports contains narrative summaries and statistics on water resources development projects of the Army Corps of Engineers where there has been activity between October 1, 1997, and September 30, 1998. Sincerely, seph W. We phal Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter North Atlantic Division New England, M A, District ............................................ 1-1 New York, NY, District ............................................ 2-1 Philadelphia, PA, District ............................................ 3-1 Baltim ore, M D, District ............................................ 4-1 Norfolk, VA, District ............................................ 5-1 South Atlantic Division W ilmington, NC, District ............................................ 6-1 Charleston, SC, District ............................................ . 7-1 Savannah, GA, District ............................................ 8-1 Jacksonville, FL, District ............................................ 9-1 M obile, AL, District ............................................ 10-1 Mississippi Valley Division New Orleans, LA, District ............................................ 11-1 Vicksburg, M S, District ............................................ 12-1 M emphis, TN, District ............................................ 13-1 St. Louis, M O, District ............................................ 14-1 Rock Island, IL, District ............................................ 15-1 St. Paul, M N, District ............................................ 16-1 Mississippi River between Missouri River and M inneapolis, M N ............................................ 17-1 Great Lakes and Ohio River Division Pittsburgh, PA, District ............................................ 18-1 O hio R iver ............................................ 19-1 Buffalo, NY, District ............................................ 20-1 Detroit, M I, District ............................................ 21-1 Chicago, IL, District ............................................ 22-1 Nashville, TN, District ............................................ 23-1 Louisville, KY, District ............................................ 24-1 Huntington, W V, District ............................................ 25-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Chapter Northwestern Division Omaha, NE, District Kansas City, MO, District Portland, OR, District Seattle, WA, District Walla Walla, WA, District Pacific Ocean Division Honolulu, HI, District Alaska District South Pacific Division Los Angeles, CA, District ... San Francisco, CA, District ... Sacramento, CA, District ... California Debris Commission Albuquerque, NM, District ... Southwestern Division Little Rock, AR, District Tulsa, OK, District Fort Worth, TX, District Galveston, TX, District Mississippi River Commission ................ Construction Engineering Research Laboratory ... Cold Regions Research & Engineering Laboratory. Waterways Experiment Station ................. Engineer Topographic Laboratories ............. Water Resources Support Center .............. Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses ................ International Boundary Water Boards ........... Investigation of Projects Under Federal Power Act ii 26-1 27-1 28-1 29-1 30-1 31-1 32-1 33-1 34-1 35-1 35-1-A 36-1 37-1 38-1 39-1 40-1 41-1 42-1 43-1 44-1 45-1 46-1 47-1 48-1 49-1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Regulatory, Sunken Vessel Removal and National Emergency Preparedness .................................... 50-1 Natural Disaster Preparedness, Response and Recovery Activities .................................... 51-1 Appendices Flood Control Reservoirs Operable ..................................... A-1 Flood Control Reservoirs Constructed or Contributed to by Corps .................. A-26 of Engineers but Operated by Others ................................... Flood Control Projects Under Construction ................................... B-1 Beach Erosion Control Projects Under Construction ........................ B-16 Environmental Restoration Projects Under Construction .. ................... B-18 Navigation Locks and Dams Operable ................................... C-1 Navigation Project Under Construction .................................. D-1 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Operable ....................... E-1 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Under Construction ............... F-1 Flood Damages Suffered and Prevented .................................. G-1 Index I-1 iii NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT * The New England District comprises all of New England except western Vermont and small portions of Massachusetts and Connecticut along their western boundaries, and includes small portions of southeastern New York, all embraced in the drainage basins tributary to Long Island Sound and the Atlantic Ocean east of the New York-Connecticut State line. It also includes Fishers Island, NY. IMPROVEMENTS Page Flood Control (Continued) 1. Andrews River, MA ...................................... 1-3 2. Aunt Lydia's Cove, Chatham, MA .......... 1-3 3. Boston Harbor, MA ....................................... 1-3 4. Cape Cod Canal, MA ................................. 1-4 5. Chatham (Stage) Harbor, MA ................... 1-4 6. Cocheco River, NH ..................................... 1-4 7. Cohassett Harbor, MA ............................... 1-5 8. Fivemile River, CT..................................... 1-5 9. Green Harbor, MA ..................................... 1-5 10. Hyannis Harbor, MA ........... .... ........1..-.6. 11. Kennebec River, ME ..................................... 1-6 12. Patchogue River, CT ..................................... 1-7 13. Plymouth Harbor, MA ............................... 1-7 14. Portland Harbor, ME ................................. 1-7 15. Providence River and Harbor, RI.................1-8 16. Salem Harbor, MA..................................... 1-8 17. Seekonk River, Providence, RI.................. 1-8 18. Sesuit Harbor, MA..................................... 1-9 Beach Erosion Control 19. Point Beach, Milford, CT .............................. 1-9 20. Woodmont Beach, Milford, CT .................. 1-9 21. Inspection of Completed Beach Erosion Control Projects ..................................... 1-10 Flood Control 22. Allendale Dam, North Providence, RI ....... 1-10 23. Blackstone River Basin, MA and RI .......... 1-10 23A. West Hill Dam, MA ................................. 1-10 24. Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), MA.................................. 1-10 Page 25. Connecticut River Basin, VT, NH, MA and CT ..................................... 1-10 25A. Ball Mountain Lake, VT.......................... 1-11 25B. Barre Falls Dam, MA .............................. 1-12 25C. Birch Hill Dam, MA................................. 1-12 25D. Colebrook River Lake, CT .......................... 1-12 25E. Conant Brook Dam, MA ............................. 1-12 25F. Knightville Dam, MA ............................... 1-12 25G. Littleville Lake, MA ................................... 1-12 25H. North Hartland Lake, VT............... ... 1-13 251. North Springfield Lake, VT .................... 1-13 25J. Otter Brook Lake, NH ................................ 1-13 25K. Surry Mountain Lake, NH ...................... 1-13 25L. Townshend Lake, VT............................... 1-13 25M. Tully Lake, MA.......................... 1-14 25N. Union Village Dam, VT .............................. 1-14 26. Faulkner Island, CT ................................ 1-14 27. Galilee Salt Marsh, RI ............................. 1-14 28. Housatonic River Basin, CT and MA......... 1-14 28A. Black Rock Lake, CT ............................... 1-14 28B. Hancock Brook Lake, CT ........................... 1-15 28C. Hop Brook Lake, CT ................................ 1-15 28D. Mad River, Waterbury (Woodtick Area), CT ................................ 1-15 28E. Northfield Brook Lake, CT......................... 1-15 28F. Thomaston Dam, CT................................ 1-16 29. Merrimack River Basin, NH and MA ........ 1-16 29A. Blackwater Dam, NH ................................. 1-16 29B. Edward MacDowell Lake, NH ................ 1-16 29C. Franklin Falls Dam, NH ............................ 1-16 29D. Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH .................. 1-17 30. New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, MA ................................... 1-17 31. Quonset Point, Davisville, RI .................. 1-17 1-1 Navigation REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Flood Control (Continued) 32. Roughans Point, Revere, MA .................. 1-17 33. Saint John River Basin, ME .................... 1-18 34. Sebago Lake, Sandish, ME......................... 1-18 35. Stamford, CT ..................................... 1-18 36. Thames River Basin, CT, RI, and MA....... 1-18 36A. Buffumville Lake, MA ............................. 1-19 36B. East Brimfield Lake, MA ........................ 1-19 36C. Hodges Village Dam, MA ........................ 1-19 36D. Mansfield Hollow Lake, CT........................ 1-19 36E. West Thompson Lake, CT ....................... 1-19 36F. Westville Lake, MA .................................... 1-20 37. Town Brook, Quincy and Braintree, MA ... 1-20 38. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ..................................... 1-20 39. Flood Control Reservoir Operations ....... 1-21 40. Hurricane Barrier Operations ................. 1-21 41. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .............................. 1-21 Investigations 42. 43. 44. 45. Surveys ......................................... 1-22 Collection and Study of Basic Data............ 1-22 Planning, Engineering and Design ......... 1-22 Preconstruction Engineering and Design .................................................... 1-22 Page Tables Table 1-A Cost & Financial Statement ............ 1-23 Table 1-B Authorizing Legislation ................ 1-32 Table 1-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ...................... 1-36 Table 1-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ................. 1-40 Table 1-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects.................. 1-41 Table 1-F Other Authorized Multiple- Purpose Projects including Power .. 1-43 Table 1-G Deauthorized Projects................... 1-44 Table 1-H Navigation Activities Pursuant to Sec. 107 .............. 11.-.4..6.... Table 1-I Beach Erosion Activities Pursuant to Sec. 103 ....................... 1-47 Table 1-J Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Sec. 205 ....................... 1-47 Table 1-K Emergency Bank Protection Activities Pursuant to Sec. 14 ...................... 1-47 Table 1-L Environmental Improvement Activities Pursuant to Sec. 1135 .................. 1-47 Table 1-M Blackstone River Basin ................. 1-48 Table 1-N Connecticut River Basin .................. 1-49 Table 1-0 Housatonic River Basin ................ 1-51 Table 1-P Merrimack River Basin ................ 1-52 Table 1-Q Thames River Basin ..................... 1-53 Table 1-R Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ........................ 1-55 1-2 Page NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT 3. BOSTON HARBOR, MA 1. ANDREWS RIVER, MA Location. On Nantucket Sound within town of Harwich, MA, about 84 miles southeast of Boston, MA. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13229.) Existing project. Channel six feet deep, 75 feet wide, extending about 2,900 feet from deep water in Nantucket Sound to a public marina, two jetties on east and west sides of harbor entrance, and three-acre maneuvering and anchorage basin. East jetty completed in June 1967. Dredging was completed in April 1968. Construction of west jetty was completed in May 1973. (See Table 1-b for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging of the entrance channel was performed by the Government-owned dredge CURRITUCK from July 28 to August 1, 1998 at a plant rental cost of $43,000. A total of 9,700 cubic yards of sand were removed and placed in a nearshore disposal site southeast of the entrance channel in Nantucket Sound. Hired labor costs of $6,300 were incurred for performing and plotting after-dredge surveys. 2. AUNT LYDIA'S COVE, CHATHAM, MA Location. Aunt Lydia's Cove is located in Chatham Harbor, Chatham, Massachusetts. The cove is approximately 90 miles southeast of Boston, Massachusetts on the "elbow" of Cape Cod. Existing project. Provides for the dredging of an entrance channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide for a length of 900 feet, and dredging of a 9.5 acre anchorage also to a depth of 8 feet. This work was completed in June 1995. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. The Chatham Municipal Fish Pier is the only terminal facility in Aunt Lydia's Cove. Initially constructed in 1945, the pier is used to off-load catch, access boats, load supplies and perform some repairs. Two independent fish companies lease space at the pier's main packing facility where fish are offloaded, packed in ice and shipped to various distributors. The pier provides diesel fuel, gasoline, parking and restroom facilities. Transient and recreational boaters use the pier for loading, offloading, and refueling. This facility is adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract for improvement dredging was awarded November 17, 1994. Work began in December 1994 and was completed in June 1995. To date, the contractor has received $670,628 with final payment pending at fiscal year end. Location. Boston Harbor includes all expanse of tidewater lying within a line from Point Allerton to Point Shirley and extending from that line westward to mainland. This comprises an area of about 47 square miles, exclusive of the islands. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Charts 13270 and 13272.) Previous project. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1917, 1938. Existing project. Completed work at Boston Harbor, adopted in 1825 and supplemented by enactments through 1958, provides for the improvement of the harbor proper and its approaches - Fort Point Channel, Reserved Channel, Chelsea River and Weir River. For a more detailed description see page 3 ofAnnual Report for 1974. These improvements were completed in May 1966 with the construction of the Chelsea River 35-foot channel and maneuvering basin. New work involves deepening the Mystic River and Reserved Channels from 35 to 40 feet and the Chelsea River Channel from 35 to 38 feet; widening and deepening to 40 feet the Inner Confluence Area which provides access to the Mystic and Chelsea River Channels; and widening at the entrance to the Reserved Channel. The proposed project would increase the navigational efficiency and safety of harbor operations and reduce tidal delays for larger vessels. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing existing projects.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed on February 13, 1998 between the Corps and the Massachusetts Port Authority for the new work. Consistent with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the non- Federal sponsor must pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction; reimburse an additional ten percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction (partially offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations and dredged material disposal areas); relocate utilities necessary for construction of the project; and deepen berthing areas at the terminals of project beneficiaries. Terminal facilities. There are 156 wharves and piers in harbor, not including Mystic, Weymouth-Fore, and Town Rivers, which are reported elsewhere. Of the terminals, 28 are publicly owned, 13 are open to public use, 73 have mechanical-handling facilities, and 70 have railroad connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. For a full description of channel facilities in Chelsea River, refer to House Document 350, 87th Congress, 2nd session. (See Port Series No. 3, Part 2, Port of Boston, MA dated 1967.) Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract for improvement dredging was awarded May 18, 1998. The contractor began dredging in the Mystic River Channel during August 1998 and was about 15 percent complete at FY end. Contractor earnings totalled $2,472,076 for improvement work. 1-3 Navigation REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed in conjunction with improvement work. Contractor earnings for maintenance work totalled $4,438,526 at FY end. Work included dredging of confined aquatic disposal cells beneath the Mystic River Channel for disposal of unsuitable material. 4. CAPE COD CANAL, MA Location. This waterway is a sea level canal; extending from the head of Buzzards Bay, MA, easterly to a point on Cape Cod Bay about 15 miles southeast of Plymouth Harbor, MA. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13246.) Existing project. For description of existing project see Annual Report for 1975. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing existing project.) Navigational improvements were completed in April 1963, with completion of East Boat Basin extension. Initial recreational development consists of public use facilities at various locations, which were completed in February 1965. Improvements to public use facilities at the East Boat Basin were completed in May 1974. Construction of public use facilities at Bourne Scenic Park were completed in May 1976. Canal is crossed by two high-level highway bridges and a vertical-lift railroad bridge. Initial major rehabilitation of Bourne Highway Bridge was completed in December 1965. More recent major rehabilitation of the two highway bridges crossing the canal is completed. Rehabilitation of the Bourne Highway Bridge was completed in 1981. The Sagamore Highway Bridge was completed in 1982. Minor rehabilitation of stone breakwater was completed in October 1963. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for local work. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Terminal facilities. There are seven terminals on the canal, of which three are privately owned. Four are used for receipt and freezing of fish and two are used for receipt and storage of oil. The seventh terminal is the State pier, which is owned by Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and is located on the north bank of the canal at Bourne Neck. Terminals are adequate for purposes for which they are used. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The cost of operation and maintenance work at the Cape Cod Canal totalled $7,463,679. Costs include $1,224,095 for vessel traffic control activities; $1,066,997 for maintenance of buildings, grounds and utilities; $728,365 for operation and maintenance of recreational facilities; $512,112 for operation and maintenance of the Buzzards Bay Railroad Bridge; and $586,759 for project administration facilities. A contract to paint the Sagamore Bridge was awarded September 14, 1998. Work had not begun by FY end. 5. CHATHAM (STAGE) HARBOR, MA Location. The harbor is located at the northeastern corner ofNantucket Sound about 16 miles east of Hyannis Harbor, MA, and 66 miles south of Providence Harbor, RI, at southeastern extremity of Cape Cod. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13237.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1942. Existing project. An entrance channel ten feet deep and 150 feet wide from Chatham Roads into upper harbor. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Construction of existing project was initiated in September and completed in October 1957. By 1961, a break in the barrier beach connecting Morris and Monomoy Islands caused the Federal Channel to fill in completely. Local interests dredged an emergency channel to obtain eight-foot depth in June 1962 and performed additional dredging in 1963. Minimal maintenance dredging by the Federal Government in April and May 1964 provided access to inner harbor for 1964 boating season. A new ten-foot channel through Harding Beach to Morris Island was completed in July 1965. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. The town operates a wharf on the north side of the inner harbor which is leased out to commercial users. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations duringfiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging of the entrance channel was peformed by the Government-owned dedge CURRITUCK from July 11 to July 27,1998 and from August 13 to August 21, 1998at a plant rental cost of $224,000. A total of 50,000cubic yards of sand were removed and disposed of at a nearshore site off of Harding Beach. Hired labor costs of $7,200 were incurred for performing and plotting after-dredge surveys, and $1,700 for project coordination and management. 6. COCHECO RIVER, NH Location. The Cocheco River is located about 9 miles northwest of Portsmouth, New Hampshire. Existing project. Provides for a 7 foot tidewater channel 60 to 75 feet wide (7.5 feet deep and 50 feet wide in rock), extending from the confluence of the Cocheco and Piscataqua Rivers to the head of navigation at the Upper Narrows in Dover, New Hampshire. Work was completed in 1906. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. The channel is used primarily by recreational craft based at a marina located near the head of the waterway. Operations duringfiscal year. Maintenance: Costs incurred in association with proposed maintenance dredg- 1-4 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT ing of the Federal channel were $372,200 for a sampling and testing contract and $46,600 for a settling test on the material to be dredged and subsequent development of a computer model of the disposal site using that information. Evaluations were provided by the Waterways Experiment Station (WES). Hired labor costs included $28,800 for sampling and testing, $11,900 for work on an environmental assessment, $6,900 for the preparation of plans and specifications, and $7,400 for project coordination. 7. COHASSETT HARBOR, MA Location. Cohasset Harbor is located along the shore of Massachusetts Bay, about 16 miles southeast of Boston Harbor and 37 miles northwest of the eastern entrance to Cape Cod Canal. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart, 3269.) Existing project. Provides for entrance channel 8 feet deep and 90 feet wide, and an 18 acre anchorage area, 7 feet deep in the inner harbor. This work was completed in July 1960. Three additional anchorage areas; 6 feet feep with 3.9 acres in Cohasset Cove, 3.3 acres in the Government Island area and 5.4 acres in Bailey Creek; were constructed under Section 107 and completed in April 1968. Rock was encountered and survey of the area was completed. Rock removal is still pending. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts has provided an 8-foot channel, 6-foot anchorage basin and 800-foot breakwater. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. There are 10 wharves in the harbor, 2 of which are open to the public, and 5 are equipped with marine railways. They are considered adequate for present harbor activities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A continuing contract in the amount of $1,248,055 for maintenance dredging of the Federal channel and anchorage was awarded on August 3, 1998. The contract included dredging town areas (both maintenance and work for others) with costs shared by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the Town of Cohasset. Dredging commenced in September 1998; by the end of the fiscal year 44,000 cubic yards were dredged and placed in the Massachusetts Bay Disposal Site (MBDS) at a cost of $536,932. A deep-water capping demonstration project was initiated under the DAMOS (Disposal Area Monitoring System) program at the MBDS in conjunction with this dredging project. The primary objective of the study was to assess the feasibility of capping operations in deep open water areas. Hired labor costs for dredging included$ 36,800 for preparation of plans and specifications, $17,100 for performing and plotting pre-dredge surveys, $21,900 for supervision and inspection, $2,400 for project coordination and management, and $1,600 for contract processing. The allowable dredging window was limited to June 15 through February 15 to protect spawning winter flounder, river herring and smelt. 8. FIVEMILE RIVER HARBOR, CT Location. Fivemile River Harbor is located on the north shore of Long Island Sound, about 41 miles east of New York City. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart, 12364.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, from the mouth of Fivemile River extending upstream about 5,300 feet. This work was completed in 1910. The upper 700 feet of the original project, which was never constructed, was deauthorized in October 1978. Mean range of tide is 7.2 feet, and extreme range due to effects of wind and other causes is 12 feet. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. There are several small wharves and piers which are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $10,600 were incurred for preparation of plans and specifications for proposed maintenance dredging of the 8-foot channel. 9. GREEN HARBOR, MA Location. Green Harbor is located on the west side of Massachusetts Bay within the town of Marshfield, MA, about 30 miles southeast of Boston, MA, and nine miles north of Plymouth Harbor, MA. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13253.) Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation, see Annual Report for 1995. Construction was completed in October 1969. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. Major terminal facility is Town Pier in village of Brant Rock. Facility is a bulkheaded, earth-filled landing and parking area about 290 feet wide, extending 210 feet into harbor. A marina service is south of Town Pier; and a facility for recreational craft has been developed on south side of harbor near head of navigation. Operations duringfiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging of the entrance channel by the Government- owned dredge CURRITUCK was performed from May 2 to May 23, 1998 at a plant rental cost of$236,200. A total of 20,340 cubic yards of sand were removed and disposed of at a nearshore site offofGreen Harbor Beach. Hired labor costs of $12,600 were incurred for performing and plotting after-dredge surveys and progress surveys. 1-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 10. HYANNIS HARBOR, MA Location. Hyannis Harbor is located along the south shore of Cape Cod, about 16 miles west of Chatham, MA. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13237.) Existing project. For description of existing project see Annual Report for 1992. New work involves deepening the Federal channel and basin to 13 feet; realigning the entrance channel through the outer Harbor to straighten the approach and eliminate two difficult turns; and widening the channel to 240 feet from the outer Harbor through most of Lewis Bay and to 220 feet from the upper reach of Lewis Bay to the entrance of the Inner Harbor. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed on November 13, 1997 between the Corps and the Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket Steamship Authority for the new work. The project sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas and perform all relocations determined by the Government to be necessary for project construction; provide during the period of construction a cash contribution equal to 10 percent of total project costs; repay with interest, over a period not to exceed 30 years following completion of construction, an additional 10 percent of total project costs partially offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations and dredged material disposal areas; and provide and maintain all berthing areas and local access channels commensurate with project features. Terminal facilities. There are two town wharves in the inner harbor. One has a bulkhead frontage of about 800 feet. Other private landings are available. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Due to the limited environmental window for dredging work, construction is being carried out in two phases. A contract for Phase I construction, consisting solely of improvement dredging of the realigned entrance channel was awarded December 23, 1997. Work begain in January 1998 and was completed in March 1998. The seasonal window for Phase I construction activities was September 1 through March 15 for protection of shellfish, sea turtles and nesting piping plovers. During Phase I, approximately 124,253 cubic yards of sand was dredged hydraulically and pumped onto Dunbar Point where it was used as beach nourishment and to create containment dikes for disposal of Phase II dredge material. Final contract amount for Phase I was $1,213,185. A contract for Phase II construction was awarded August 19, 1998. Work began in September 1998 and was about 15 percent complete at FY end. Phase II consists of deepening the channel and basin to 13 feet and channel widening. Maintenance dredging was performed in conjunction with this work. The seasonal window for Phase II construction activities is September 1 through January 31 for protection of shellfish,sea turtles and the winter flounder present in Lewis Bay. The contractor began dredging of a confined aquatic disposal (CAD) cell beneath the abandoned channel reach in the outer harbor. This work was allocated to both the improvement and maintenance increments of the project. Approximately 41,600 cubic yards of sand (18,299 cubic yards allocated to maintenance and 23,400 cubic yards allocated to impovement) were dredged hydraulically and pumped to Dunbar Point where it was used for beach nourishment. Material from Dunbar Point was transferred by truck to two other municipal beaches in Barnstable to free site capacity for additional Phase II material. Contract cost incurred this FY for Phase II improvement work were $364,267. Maintenance: Costs incurred this FY for maintenance were $211,600 for dredging and disposal; $2,900 for hired labor and project managemet, environmental coordination, geotechnical analyses and contract processing; and $11,300 for performing and plotting predredge surveys. 11. KENNEBEC RIVER, ME Location. The Kennebec River flows from Moosehead Lake in northern Maine about 150 miles southerly and discharges into the Atlantic Ocean at Popham Beach in Phippsburg, about 25 miles east of Portland, ME. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13298.) Previous project. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation, see Annual Report for 1992. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Wharves suitable for landing or loading are at Bath, Woolwich, Richmond, Randolph, Gardiner, Hallowell, and Augusta. Rail connections are available at some wharves. Depths range from 12 to 25 feet. Many facilities are equipped with a mechanism for handling passengers and freight. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging of the Federal channel at Doubling Point and Popham Beach was performed by a contract hopper dredge in November 1997 at a contract cost of $370,136. Approximately 10,288 cubic yards of sand were removed from Doubling Point and disposed of at a previously used in-river disposal site about two miles south of the dredging area and north of Bluff Head. The environmental dredging window for the Doubling Point reach was from November 1 through April 30 due to the presence of endangered short-nosed sturgeon. Additionally, 11,372 cubic yards of sand were removed from the Popham Beach reach and disposed of at a previously used nearshore site offofJacknife Ledge. Hired labor costs included $3,500 for the preparation of plans and specifications, $4,400 for supervision and inspection, $24,300 for performing and plotting pre- and after-dredge surveys, and $600 for contract processing. 1-6 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT 12. PATCHOGUE RIVER, CT Location. Patchogue River is a small tidal stream about 3 miles long located in the town of Westbrook, CT. The mouth of the river is located along the north shore of Long Island Sound, about 7 miles west of the Connecticut River. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Charts 12374 and 12354.) Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation, see Annual Report for 1984. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. For details see Annual Report for 1984. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The project limits were modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 to eliminate encroachments into the Federal project limits in the area of the town wharf. The western channel limit adjacent to the town wharf was shifted 25 feet easterly and the western anchorage limit opposite the wharf was shifted 5 feet easterly, with the result that the channel at the location was narrowed to 80 feet and the southern end of the anchorage was narrowed to 45 feet wide. Maintenance dredging of the modified 8-foot Federal channel and anchorage under a continuing contract awarded last FY began on October 23, 1997 and was completed on February 25, 1998. A total of 29,000 cubic yards of material were removed by mechancial dredge and disposed of at the Cornfield Shoals Disposal Site in Long Island Sound this FY at a cost of $311,810. The seasonal dredging window for environmental purposes, principally for protection of shellfish and winter flounder, is October 1 through January 31. An extension of this window was granted for a single day's work in February to remove approximately 100 cubic yards of isolated shoals. Hired labor costs this FY included $53,400 for supervision and inspection, $27,000 for performing and plotting pre- and after-dredge surveys, $1,000 for project coordination and management, and $500 for contract processing. 13. PLYMOUTH HARBOR, MA Location. Plymouth Harbor is located 45 miles south of Boston, MA. Its outer anchorage, the "Cow Yard," is common to Plymouth, Duxbury, and Kingston, MA. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13253.) Previous projects. For details, see Annual Reports for 1815 and 1938. Existing project. Provides riprap along sections of Long Beach damaged by storm of November 1898, and restoring Eel River to its former course; dredging a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide, increased at entrance and on curves, from the bay to town wharves, formerly in areas south of State Pier, a distance of about 2.5 miles, with a suitable turning basin at inner end; dredging a channel 150 feet wide, 15 feet deep, extending northwesterly about 0.3 miles from a point off site of northerly Craigs Wharf (now State Pier) with a turning basin 300 feet square, and of same depth, at its northwesterly end; maintenance of area dredged to 18 feet deep by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, connecting 15-foot channel with 18-foot channel in vicinity of State Pier; a rubblestone breakwater extending 1,400 feet easterly from a point north of Town Wharf, and thence southeasterly for 2,100 feet; an anchorage eight feet deep and 60 acres in area inside breakwater, and elimination of authorized 18-foot anchorage from existing project; recreational development, to provide for sport fishing from breakwater, consisting of stone causeway about 360 feet long from westerly end of breakwater to land, guardrail along top of breakwater and causeway footbridge spanning a navigation opening through breakwater, and public access, parking and sanitary facilities for sport fisherman use. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing existing project.) Project is complete. Construction of anchorage eight feet deep and 60 acres in area inside breakwater was completed in 1967. Construction of the rubblestone breakwater was completed in 1971. Rehabilitation of Long Beach Dike was completed in 1971. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal work facilities. There are three wharves of pile and timber construction; one is owned by the State, one by the town, and the third by Plymouth Yacht Club. State and town wharves are open to public use. In addition, there are two boatyards with marine railway facilities along waterfront, equipped for boat building and repairs. Local interests will maintain existing public landings open to all on equal terms, and provide all necessary mooring facilities in anchorage. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A cost of $6,100 was incurred on a contract for geotechnical engineering and design work for maintenance of the dike at Long Beach. Hired labor costs of $5,300 were incurred for management of the contract and evaluation of the information obtained in association with proposed repairs to the dike. 14. PORTLAND HARBOR, ME Location. Portland Harbor is located on the southwestern coast of Maine, about 100 miles northeast of Boston, MA. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13292.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1915 and 1936. Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation, see Annual Report for 1978. Project was completed in 1966, except for ledge removal that was completed in 1968. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. 1-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Terminal facilities. There are 37 waterfront facilities, of which 4 are not used. Seven wharves are publicly owned, 4 by the U.S. Government, 2 by State of Maine, and 1 by city of South Portland. Mechanical-handling facilities are available at 24 wharves. Railroad connections have been made to 27 of them. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A continuing contract in the amount of $3,318,800 for maintenance dredging of the 35-foot deep portions of the project was awarded in September 1998. No expenditures on the contract were incurred this FY. Hired labor costs included $11,600 for the preparation of plans and specifications, $47,200 for performing and plotting a predredge survey, $4,800 for project coordination and management, and $1,600 for contarct processing. 15. PROVIDENCE RIVER AND HARBOR, RI Location. The Providence River originates in Providence, RI at the junction of two small streams, the Woonasquatucket and Moshassuck Rivers. It then flows southerly about a mile to the head of Providence Harbor at Fox Point where it is joined by the Seekonk River and continues southerly another 8 miles to Narragansett Bay. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Charts 13224 and 13225.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1936, and 1938. Existing project. Provides for a channel 16.8 miles long and 40 feet deep, generally 600 feet wide from deep water in Narragansett Bay just south of Prudence Island Light to the turn below Field Point at Providence, thence up to 1,700 feet wide to Fox Point. The existing 40-foot channel was completed in January 1976. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing existing project.) Dredging of a 30- foot channel, 150 feet wide from the upper end of the existing project to India Point at the mouth of the Seekonk River was deauthorized in November 1986. Local cooperation. Assurances have been received. However, local interests have yet to provide berthing areas commensurate to channel depths. Terminal facilities. There are 27 water terminal facilities serving port of Providence, RI. Three-fourths of all facilities have railway connections. Four facilities are owned by city of Providence and two by the State of Rhode Island. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Cost incurred for various contracts used in support of efforts to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement associated with proposed maintenance dredging of the 40-foot Federal channel were $4,800 for lobster studies, $45,300 for editing, $3,500 for fisheries write-up, $9,800 for shellfish studies, and $20,500 for printing. Hired labor costs included $367,200 for environmental studies, $86,800 for the engineering studies, $63,300 for project coordination and management, $2,600 for contract processing, and $500 for audio/visual support. 16. SALEM HARBOR, MA Location. Salem Harbor is located on the north shore of Massachusetts Bay, about 12 miles north of the entrance to Boston Harbor. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Charts 240 and 1207.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Report of 1915. Existing project. Channel 32 feet deep and generally 300 feet wide, widened to 400 feet at bends and at inner end, extending about 1.5 miles from deep water in outer harbor to a point about 1,500 feet from Salem Terminal wharf, where it joins locally dredged approach channel of same depth leading to wharf. Project also provides for a channel 10 feet deep in South River, 300 feet wide at 10- foot depth in harbor, gradually narrowing to 200 feet at a point opposite outer end of Derby Wharf, thence 150 feet wide to a bend at outer end of Derby Wharf, thence 90 feet wide to turn near inner end of Derby Wharf, and thence 50 feet wide to upstream end of Pickering Wharf, for a branch channel on east side of Derby Wharf, 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 700 feet long, widening into a basin of south same depth, 500 feet long and 200 feet wide. Existing project was completed in November 1967. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. Extensively developed waterfront of Salem Harbor, including South River, is about 1 mile in extent and owned by private interests; of the nine wharves in the area, Salem Terminal, the largest, serves New England Power Co. generating station, and as principal terminal for receipt and distribution of coal and petroleum products in Salem and tributary area; two belong to National Park Service, and one of these is being used by the Navy for a training center. Nine other wharves in harbor are outside of extensively developed area. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A cost of $53,300 was incurred on a contact for sampling and testing in association with plans for maintenance dredging of the Federal channels. Hired labor costs included $12,500 for the administration of sampling and testing, $2,200 for project coordination and management and for Corps support of State Dredged Material Management Studies, and $500 for contract processing. 17. SEEKONK RIVER, PROVIDENCE, RI Location. The India Point Railroad Bridge is located at the mouth of the Seekonk River in Providence, Rhode Island. 1-8 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT Existing project. Provides for the removal of the abandoned India Point Railroad Bridge at a currently estimated cost of $1,300,000. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing project.) Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not been requested yet. Local sponsors must transfer title of the bridge to the United States and provide 50 percent of construction costs. Revenue derived from the sale of scrap from the bridge shall be credited toward the non- Federal share of project costs. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Preparation of project plans and specifications continued along with coordination with the Rhode Island State Historic Preservation Office to identify measures to mitigate for the removal of this historic bridge. 18. SESUIT HARBOR, MA Location. Sesuit Harbor is located on the north shore of Dennis in Barnstable County, about 85 miles southeast of Boston, MA. The town of Dennis is bordered on the north by Cape Cod Bay, Brewster and Harwich on the east, Nantucket Sound on the south, and Yarmouth on the west. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13250.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide from deep water in Cape Cod Bay to a point opposite the Dennis Yacht Club, thence reducing in width to 80 feet at the entrance to the inner harbor basin, for a total channel length of 2,400 feet. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing existing project.) Project was completed in August 1982. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Operations duringfiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging of the entrance channel was performed by the Government-owned dredge CURRITUCK from August 2 through August 12, 1998 at a plant rental cost of $133,000. A total of 20,700 cubic yards of sand were removed and placed east of the entrance channel in a nearshore area off of Cold Storage Beach. Hired labor costs of $7,100 were incurred for performing and plotting pre- and after-dredge surveys and progress surveys. Beach Erosion Control 19. POINT BEACH, MILFORD, CT Location. The city of Milford is located in southcentral Connecticut along the northern shore of Long Island Sound. Point Beach is a residential subdivision located in Milford about 75 miles northeast of New York City and 10 miles southwest of New Haven, Connecticut. Existing project. The proposed project involves raising the first floor of 58 shorefront and backshore residential structures above the estimated 100 year flood elevation. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed on January 14, 1997 between the Corps and the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection. The project sponsor must pay 35 percent of all costs allocated to storm damage reduction, assume all costs above the Federal cost limitation of $2,000,000 and assume all costs for the maintenance and repair of the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Bids to raise 55 residential homes in the Point Beach area were opened during FY 1997, but were rejected as excessive in relation to the Government estimate at the request of the City of Milford, CT. It was hoped that by dividing the contract into groups of 6 homes each, smaller construction firms and local builders could bid on the work and reduce costs. Bids to raise 6 homes were received on December 23, 1997 but were again determined to be too high by the project sponsor and the solicitation was cancelled. The project sponsor is actively seeking Congressional help to either raise the Federal Section 103 statutory limit for Point Beach or specifically authorized the project. 20. WOODMONT BEACH, MILFORD, CT Location. Woodmont Beach is located on the northern shore of Long Island Sound in the borough of Woodmont, City of Milford about five miles southwest of New Haven, CT and some 82 miles northeasterly of New York City. Existing project. The original project provided for Federal participation in the amount of one-third of the first cost of protection and improvement of those portions of the shore which are publicly owned by widening to a width of 100 feet by direct placement of sand, 500 feet of shore in the first pocket beach west of Merwin Point; widening to a width of 100 - 150 feet, 3,500 feet of shore from Chapel Street northerly to a point about 400 feet north of Anderson Avenue; and construction of five impermeable groins 300 to 400 feet long. This work was completed by the State of Connecticut in 1959. (For details see Annual Report for 1961.) Work authorized in March 1992 provided for the direct placement ofsandfill along approximately 1,500 feet of beach between Clinton and Bonsilene Street to form a berm 50 feet wide, reconstruction of the Usher Road/Dunbar Street and Bonsilene Street groins, and mitigation to replace rocky habitat for Blue Mussels lost as a result of sand placement. This work was completed in 1994. New work involves periodic beach nourishment over the 50-year economic life of the project. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. In accordance with the Local Cooperation Agreement signed May 18, 1992 between the Corps and the City of Milford, the project sponsor must pay 35 percent of the total cost of periodic beach nourishment. 1-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Operations during fiscal year. Continued preparation of plans and specifications for renourishment of Woodmont Beach. 21. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS No beach inspections were conducted in FY 1998. Flood Control 22. ALLENDALE DAM, NORTH PROVIDENCE, RI Location. Allendale Dam is located along the Woonasquatucket River which forms the boundary line between the towns of North Providence and Johnston, Rhode Island. Existing project. Provides for the reconstruction of Allendale Dam. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing project.) Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not been requested yet. The project sponsor must obtain title to the Allendale Dam; provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations necessary for project construction; pay 25 percent of project costs; and assume all costs for the operation and maintenance of the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. Work continued on negotiation of the project cooperation agreement and transfer of the dam title to the City of North Providence. During FY 1998 we were alerted by EPA of possible contamination of sediments behind the dam. The RI Department of Environmental Management has requested we postpone further efforts until they conduct a risk assessment and make appropriate recommendations. 23. BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, MA AND RI Works covered by this plan include a dam and reservoir on West River and local protection works at three cities on Blackstone River. Flood Control Act of 1944 authorized plan for a reservoir on West River and local protection works at Worcester, MA, and Woonsocket and Pawtucket, RI, substantially in accordance with House Document 624, 78th Congress, 2nd session. Flood Control Act of 1960 authorized a local flood protection project at lower Woonsocket, RI, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 87, 85th Congress, 2nd Session. Local protection nonstructural project authorized in 1982 for Belmont Park section of Warwick, RI, along the Pawtuxet River. Streambank protection projects on the Blackstone River in Millbury, MA, and on the Clear River in Burrillville, RI, were authorized in 1985. (See Table 1- L at end of chapter on Reservoir and Local Protection Projects, Blackstone River Basin, for projects comprising authorized plan.) 23A. WEST HILL DAM, MA Location. Dam is on West River, MA, three miles above its confluence with Blackstone River and 2.5 miles northeast ofUxbridge, MA. (See Geological Survey maps Blackstone, MA and RI, Milford, MA, and Grafton, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Work on contract for dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in June 1959 and completed in June 1961. Construction of recreational facilities was completed in June 1967. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1944 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 24. CHARLES RIVER (NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE AREAS), MA Location. The Charles River extends inland from Boston Harbor southwesterly toward the Massachusetts-Rhode Island border and is some 80 miles long with a watershed covering 307 square miles. Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation, see Annual Report for 1995. Land acquisition was completed in 1990. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to prevent modifications or alteration of existing roadways, utilities, bridges, culverts, and any other improvements that might affect the drainage characteristics of the natural storage areas; adopt and enforce regulations to restrict development of flood plain lands; and operate and maintain the existing dams along the Charles River. Local assurances were provided by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs for ordinary maintenance activities, project surveillance and inspection, as well as land use administration, were $155,700. 25. CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, VT, NH, MA AND CT Location. Works covered by this project are a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of Connecticut River in Vermont, New Hampshire and Massachusetts, within a radius of 230 miles from Hartford, CT, and local protection works at several cities in the basin. 1-10 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended by Act of May 25,1937, authorized construction of ten reservoirs on tributaries of Connecticut River in accordance with plans in House Document 412, 74th Congress, 2nd session, as the same may be revised upon further investigation of 1936 flood. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved a general comprehensive plan for control of floods and other purposes in Connecticut River Valley, as set forth in House Document 455, 75th Congress, 2nd session, and authorized $11,524,000 for construction of local flood protection projects in the plan. Act of October 15, 1940, modified Act of June 18, 1938, to provide additional protection at East Hartford, CT, as set forth in House Document 653, 76th Congress, 3rd session. Act of August 18, 1941, modified comprehensive plan approved in 1938 to include improvements recommended in House Document 653, 76th Congress, 3rd session, and House Document 724, 76th Congress, 3rd session, with such further modifications as may be found justifiable in discretion of Secretary of the Army and Chief of Engineers. Latter Act also authorized to be appropriated additional $6 million for local protection works and $10 million for reservoirs. Act of October 26, 1942, further modified plan by including construction of Gully Brook conduit at Hartford, CT. Flood Control Act of 1944 authorized expenditure of $30 million in addition to previous authorization for comprehensive plan approved in 1938 and modified plan by directing specific consideration of an alternative plan of Vermont State Water Conservation Board instead ofWilliamsville Reservoir in West River Basin, VT; directing consultation with affected States during course of investigations and transmission of proposal and plans to each affected State for written views and recommendations for reservoir projects heretofore authorized for construction at Cambridgeport, Ludlow, South Tunbridge, and Gaysville, and resubmission of projects or modifications for construction of Sugar Hill site. Flood Control Act of 1950 modified project for flood control at Hartford, CT, authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938, as amended to include Folly Brook dike and conduit. Flood Control Act of 1954 modified plan for flood control in Connecticut River Basin to provide for construction of a reservoir on Otter Brook at South Keene, NH, in lieu of any reservoir or reservoirs heretofore authorized. This Act further modified plan for West River Basin of Connecticut River in Vermont to consist of three reservoirs at Ball Mountain, The Island, and Townshend sites, in lieu of plan of eight reservoirs authorized in Flood Control Act of 1944. Flood Control Act of 1958 modified plan for flood control in Connecticut River Basin to include construction of Littleville Reservoir on Middle Branch of Westfield River, MA, and Mad River Reservoir on Mad River, above Winsted, CT. Flood Control Act of 1960 included authorization in Connecticut River Basin of plan for flood protection on Chicopee River, MA, substantially in accordance with House Document 434, 86th Congress; plan for flood protection on Westfield River, MA, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 109, 86th Congress; plan for flood control and related purposes on Farmington River, CT, substantially in accordance with House Document 443, 86th Congress. Flood Control Act of 1968 included authorization in Connecticut River Basin of plan for construction of Beaver Brook Reservoir, on Beaver Brook in Keene, NH, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 60, 90th Congress; and plan for protection on Park River, CT, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 43, 90th Congress. Flood Control Act of 1970 deauthorized the construction ofa reservoir at Claremont, NH. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976 deauthorized the construction of Gaysville Lake, VT project. Flood control projects at Cambridgeport Lake, Brockway Lake, Victory Lake, South Tunbridge Lake, Ludlow Lake and The Island Lake, VT; Honey Hill Lake, West Canaan Lake, and the Alternative to Sugar Hill Reservoir, NH, were deauthorized in August 1977 in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974. The authorization for Beaver Brook Lake, NH project expired in April 1978 due to lack of local cooperation. Local protection projects at Gardner, MA, West Springfield, MA, Hartford, VT, Wethersfield, CT, and Keene, NH authorized and constructed in accordance with Section 205 of 1948 Flood Control Act. Emergency streambank erosion control projects at Brownsville, VT; Conway, MA; Huntington, MA; Charlestown, NH; North Stratford, NH; Colchester, CT; Middletown, CT; Milford, CT; Simsbury, CT; and two projects in Leominster, MA authorized in accordance with Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act were completed. (See Table 1-M at end of chapter for reservoirs and local protection works for Connecticut River Basin.) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 modified the comprehensive plan for the control of flood-waters in the Connecticut River Basin, Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, and Connecticut, authorized by Section 5 of the Act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1572) by authorizing the design, construction, operation, and maintenance of facilities at Townshend Dam, West River, VT to enable upstream migrant adult Atlantic salmon to bypass that dam and Ball Mountain Dam, VT, and to provide at both Townshend and Ball Mountain Dams facilities as necessary for the downstream passage of juvenile Atlantic salmon. This work was completed in February 1993. 25A. BALL MOUNTAIN LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on West River, 29 miles above its junction with Connecticut River at Brattleboro, VT. It is two miles north of Jamaica, VT. (See Geological Survey map for Londonderry, VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1994. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1957 and completed in November 1961. Cost of work was $10,448,000 for construction and $350,000 for lands and damages, a total of$10,798,000. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in June 1975 and completed in June 1977. Fish passage facility work began in June 1992 and was completed in February 1993. Project is complete. Project is a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Connecticut River Basin. 1-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract to replace guard rails was awarded July 1, 1997. Work began late September 1997 and was completed in November 1997. Final contract amount was $113,994. 25B. BARRE FALLS DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Ware River in town of Barre, MA, 31.9 miles above confluence of Ware and Swift Rivers. It is 13 miles northwest of Worcester, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Barre, MA and Wachusett Mountain, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1956 and completed in May 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to repair concrete at the dam was awarded August 20, 1997. Work began in August 1998 and was completed that month. Final contract amount was $141,655. 25C. BIRCH HILL DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Millers River, 27.3 miles above its junction with the Connecticut River. It is 1.3 miles east of South Royalston, MA and 7.5 miles northwest of Gardner, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Royalston and Winchendon, MA-NH and Templeton, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in June 1940 and completed in February 1942. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests have contributed $32,000 as their required 50 percent cost sharing of recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 25D. COLEBROOK RIVER LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is in town ofColebrook, Litchfield County, CT, on West Branch Farmington River about 3.9 miles upstream from its confluence with Still River at Riverton, CT, and about 1.5 miles upstream from Goodwin (Hogback) Dam. (See Geological Survey map for Winsted, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1965 and completed in June 1969. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in August 1969 and completed in June 1970. Local cooperation. Water supply contract was signed by Hartford Connecticut Metropolitan Water District. Repayment is being made in accordance with provisions of 1958 Water Supply Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance. Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 25E. CONANT BROOK DAM, MA Location. Site is in south central part of Massachusetts in town of Monson. Damsite, across Conant Brook, is about two miles southeast of community of Monson, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Monson, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam, highway relocations, and appurtenances was initiated in June 1964 and completed in December 1966. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 25F. KNIGHTVILLE DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Westfield River, 27.5 miles above its confluence with Connecticut River. It is four miles north of town of Huntington, MA, and about 12 miles west of city of Northampton, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Westhampton, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1939 and completed in December 1941. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 25G. LITTLEVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Middle Branch of Westfield River, one mile above its confluence with main stem of Westfield River and 25.2 miles above confluence of Westfield River with Connecticut River, in town ofChester, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Chester, MA.) 1-12 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated under a multicomponent contract in June 1962 and completed in September 1965. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, and Title III, Water Supply Act of 1958 applies and fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 25H. NORTH HARTLAND LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on Ottauquechee River, 1.5 miles above its junction with Connecticut River, and one mile northwest of North Hartland, VT. Reservoir extends upstream 5.5 miles. (See Geological Survey map for Hanover NH-VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in June 1958 and completed in June 1961. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to repave roads and parking areas at North Hartland Lake and Franklin Falls Dam was awarded August 24, 1998. Work had not bugn by FY end. 251. NORTH SPRINGFIELD LAKE, VT Location. Dam is in town of Springfield, VT, on Black River, 8.7 miles above its junction with Connecticut River, and three miles northwest of Springfield, VT. (See Geological Survey maps for Ludlow, VT, and Claremont, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in May 1958 and completed in November 1960. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 25J. OTTER BROOK LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Otter Brook, 2.4 miles upstream from its junction with The Branch, which flows 2.5 miles to Ashuelot River at Keene, NH. (See National Ocean Survey maps for Keene, NH-VT, and Monadnock, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in September 1956 and completed in August 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 25K. SURRY MOUNTAIN LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Ashuelot River, 34.6 miles above its junction with Connecticut River and five miles north of Keene, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Keene and Bellows Falls, NH-VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1939 and completed in June 1942. Initial phase of additional recreational facilities completed in September 1969, secondary phase in 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 25L. TOWNSHEND LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on West River, 19.1 miles above its junction with Connecticut River at Brattleboro, VT, and about two miles west of Townshend, VT. Reservoir extends upstream about four miles. (See Geological Survey maps for Saxtons River, VT, and Londonderry, VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizating legislation, see Annual Report for 1994. Reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated system for flood control in Connecticut River Basin. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1958 and completed in June 1961. Initial phase of additional recreational facilities completed in October 1969 and secondary phase completed in September 1971. Fish passage facility work began in June 1992 and was completed in February 1993. Project is complete. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract to repair a scour hole was awarded August 18, 1995. Work began in July 1996 and was completed in July 1997. Final contact amount was 1-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 $683,148. A contract to repair and paint the spillway bridge was awarded June 18, 1998. Work had not begun by FY end. 25M. TULLY LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on East Branch of Tully River, 3.9 miles above its junction with Millers River. It is one mile north of Fryville, MA, and 3.5 miles north of Athol, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Royalston, MA-NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was initiated in March 1947 and completed in September 1949. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development, in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreational Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 25N. UNION VILLAGE DAM, VT Location. Dam is on Ompompanoosuc River, four miles above its junction with Connecticut River. It is onefourth mile north of Union Village, VT, and 11 miles north of White River Junction, VT. (See Geological Survey maps for Strafford, VT and Mount Cube, NH-VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of the dam was initiated in March 1947 and completed in June 1950. Local Cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 26. FAULKNER ISLAND, CT Location. Faulkner Island is located in Long Island Sound about 3 miles south of Guilford, Connecticut. Faulkner Lighthouse is located about 35 feet from the cliff edge along the eastern side of the island. Existing project. Provides for the construction of shoreline protection measures along the east side of the island adjacent to Faulkner Lighthouse. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not been requested yet. The island is owned and operated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as a National Wildlife Refuge. Prior to construction, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service must agree to maintain the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Continued preparation of plans and specifications. 27. GALILEE SALT MARSH, RI Location. Galilee Salt Marsh is located in southern Rhode Island in the town of Narragansett about 30 miles south of Providence, between Point Judith Harbor of Refuge and Bluff Hill Cove. Existing project. Provides for installing two culverts beneath Escape Road and excavating channels to restore about 34 acres of formner salt marsh. This area was degraded by the disposal of dredged material from the Federal navigation project at Point Judith Harbor of Refuge. Project was completed in August 1997. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract to restore Galilee Salt Marsh was awarded August 13, 1996. Work began in October 1996 and was substantially completed in August 1997. Contractor earnings totalled $1,165,870, with final contract payment pending at FY end. 28. HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN, CT AND MA Seven flood control reservoirs on tributaries of the Naugatuck River, principal tributary of the Housatonic River, and three local protection projects have been specifically authorized as part of an overall plan for flood control in the Housatonic River Basin. The Naugatuck and Housatonic Rivers converge 12 miles above mouth of Housatonic River. A project for emergency snagging and clearing of the Blackberry River, a tributary of the Housatonic River, was authorized under authority contained in Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Emergency streambank protection projects at: Alford, Green River, MA; Sheffield, MA; Salisbury, CT; and Squantz Pond, Fairfield, CT were authorized under authority provided by Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. Projects for local flood protection for: West Branch, Torrington, CT; East Branch, Torrington, CT; Mad River, Waterbury (Woodtick Area), CT; Pittsfield, MA; and Waterbury-Watertown, CT, were authorized under authority provided by Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-Nl on dams, reservoirs, and local protection projects for Housatonic River Basin.) 28A. BLACK ROCK LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is on Branch Brook, about two miles upstream from its confluence with Naugatuck 1-14 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT River, in towns of Thomaston and Watertown, CT. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Road relocation completed in November 1967. Contract for construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated in July 1967 and completed in July 1971. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 28B. HANCOCK BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Hancock Brook, in town of Plymouth, CT, about 3.4 miles above its confluence with Naugatuck River. (See Geological Survey map for Waterbury, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in July 1963 and completed in August 1966. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 28C. HOP BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is on Hop Brook, in city of Waterbury and towns ofMiddlebury and Naugatuck, CT, about 1.4 miles upstream of confluence ofNaugatuck River and Hop Brook. (See Geological Survey map for Waterbury, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in December 1965 and completed in December 1968. Construction of a public use facility was completed in November 1973. Construction of an additional restroom was completed in 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 28D. MAD RIVER, WATERBURY (WOODTICK AREA), CT Location. The City of Waterbury is located in westcentral Connecticut, about 20 miles north of New Haven, Connecticut and about 25 miles southwest of Hartford, Connecticut. The Woodtick area of Waterbury is located along the Mad River between Sharon and Frost Road Bridges and consists primarily of residential development including several apartment and condominium complexes, some light manufacturing companies, and a large shopping mall. Existing project. Provides for widening and deepening the existing channel along two restricted areas of the Mad River, totaling 1,450 linear feet. This work was completed in August 1997. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Final project costs were apportioned between the Federal and non-Federal accounts. 28E. NORTHFIELD BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Northfield Brook, about 1.3 miles upstream from its confluence with Naugatuck River, in town ofThomaston, CT. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated in May 1963 and completed in October 1965. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in November 1966 and completed in August 1967. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 1-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 28F. THOMASTON DAM, CT Location. On Naugatuck River, about 30.4 miles above its junction with Housatonic River, and about 1.6 miles north of Thomaston, CT. Reservoir extends upstream about 6.4 miles. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1958 and completed in November 1960. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1944 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 29. MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, NH AND MA Works covered by comprehensive plan are on Merrimack River and its tributaries in New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Flood Control Act of 1936 authorized construction of a system of flood control reservoirs in Merrimack River Basin for reduction of flood heights in Merrimack Valley. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes as approved by Chief of Engineers pursuant to preliminary examinations and surveys authorized by Act of June 22, 1936, and modified project to provide in addition to construction of a system of flood control reservoirs, related flood control works which may be found justified by the Chief of Engineers. All operations pertaining to flood control in Merrimack River Basin are now carried on under and reported under projects for individual units of comprehensive plan referred to above. No further expenditures are contemplated under general project for flood control in Merrimack River Basin. For final cost and financial summary, see Annual Report for 1946. A comprehensive plan for development of water resources of the North Nashua River Basin, a principal tributary of the Merrimack River, was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act substantially in accordance with Senate Document 113, 89th Congress. Plan provides for construction of coordinated system of four reservoirs and three local protection projects for flood protection, water supply, recreation and allied purposes. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 deauthorized two of the reservoirs and one of the local protection projects. The 1966 Flood Control Act also authorized construction of Saxonville local protection project substantially in accordance with Senate Document 61, 89th Congress. Emergency streambank protection projects at Amesbury, MA and two in Leominster, MA were authorized under authority provided by Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-0 at end of chapter for reservoirs and related flood control works for Merrimack River Basin.) 29A. BLACKWATER DAM, NH Location. Dam is on Blackwater River, 8.2 miles above confluence with Contoocook River, and 118.8 miles above mouth of Merrimack River. It is in the town of Webster, NH, just above village of Swetts Mills, NH, 18 miles by highway northwest of Concord, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Penacook and Mount Kearsarge, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete except for construction of public facilities. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1940 and completed in November 1941. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 29B. EDWARD MACDOWELL LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Nubanusit Brook, a tributary of Contoocook River, one-half mile upstream from village of West Peterborough, NH, and 14 miles east ofKeene, NH. (See Geological Survey map for Peterboro and Monadnock, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in March 1948 and completed in March 1950. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 29C. FRANKLIN FALLS DAM, NH Location. Dam is onPemigewasset River, main tributary of Merrimack River, and about 2.5 miles upstream of Franklin, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Penacook and Holderness, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1939 and completed in October 1943. 1-16 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract to repave roads and parking areas at Franklin Falls Dam and North Hartland Lake was awarded August 24, 1998. Work had not begun by FY end. 29D. HOPKINTON-EVERETT LAKES, NH Location. Hopkinton Dam is on Contoocook River, 17.3 miles above its junction with Merrimack River and about one-half mile upstream from village of West Hopkinton, NH. Everett Dam is on Piscataquog River, 16 miles above its junction with Merrimack River, and about 1.3 miles southeast of village of East Weare, NH. Two interconnecting canals were provided to enable the two reservoir areas to function as one. (See Geological Survey map for Hillsboro, NH, and Concord, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of two dams and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1959 and completed in December 1962. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in November 1974 and completed in September 1975. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 30. NEW BEDFORD, FAIRHAVEN AND ACUSHNET, MA Location. Main harbor barrier is across New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbor in vicinity of Palmer Island. Supplemental dikes and walls are provided in Clark Cove area of New Bedford and Fairhaven. (See Geological survey maps for New Bedford North, New Bedford South, Marion, and Sconticut Neck, MA and National Ocean Service Coast Survey Charts 13230, 13070 and 13218.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of barrier and appurtenances was initiated in October 1962 and completed in January 1966. Construction ofthe pumping station was initiated in October 1962 and completed in June 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operations and maintenance activities were conducted. 31. QUONSET POINT, DAVISVILLE, RI Location. Quonset Point is located in east central Rhode Island along the west shore of Narragansett Bay in the village of Davisville and Town of North Kingstown, about 15 miles south of Providence, Rhode Island. Existing project.Provides for the construction of two elevated water storage towers and relocation of6,000 feet of sewer line. Construction of the water towers was completed in September 1998 and work on the sewer line was commpleted in July 1998. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed January 29, 1997 between the Corps and the Rhode Island Economic Development Corporation. The sponsor must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and suitable borrow and dredged or excavated material disposal areas, and shall perform or ensure performance of all relocations necessary for the construction, operation, and maintenance of the project. The sponsor must also provide 25 percent of construction costs and assume all costs in excess of the Federal limitations of $1,350,000 for construction of the two elevated water storage towers and $1,050,000 for sewer line relocation. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract to construct two elevated water storage towers was awarded May 7, 1997. Work began in August 1997 and was completed in Septemer 1998. Contractor earnings totalled $1,875,000 with final payment pending at FY end. A contract to relocate about 6,000 feet of sewer line was awarded May 7, 1997. Work began in September 1997 and was completed in July 1998. Contractor earnings totalled $787,629 with final payment pending at FY end. 32. ROUGHANS POINT, REVERE, MA Location. The city of Revere is a coastal community located in Suffolk County about five miles northeast of Boston, MA. Roughans Point is a low-lying, ocean front neighborhood of Revere. The area has 55 acres and about 300 structures, mostly residential homes. Existing project. Project consists of 3,125 feet of stone revetment to dissipate incoming waves, prevent overtopping and stabilize existing facilities along the shoreline. The revetment would extend from a point about 250 feet south of Eliot Circle southerly to a point 200 feet south of the intersection of Winthrop Parkway and Leverett Avenue. The project also calls for "backwater" protection by raising the ground elevation one foot at 1-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 the intersection of Bennington Street and State Road and installing a sluice gate on the 42-inch drain from the Roughans area to Sales Creek. Interior drainage improvements consist of a new intake structure at the existing pump station and a new gravity drain with a sluice gate. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed April 25, 1997 between the Corps and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management. The project sponsor must provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations necessary for construction of the structural elements of the project, including ponding areas, borrow areas, and disposal areas for excavated material; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction, operation, and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacements; pay an amount in cash to bring the total non-Federal share to 35 percent of project costs allocated to storm damage reduction. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract to construct the stone revetment project was awarded September 17, 1997. Work began in December 1997 and was about 40 percent complete at FY end with contractor earnings of $2,700,000. 33. SAINT JOHN RIVER BASIN, ME Location. The project is located in Aroostook county in northern Maine, and lies within the Saint John River Basin. Existing project. The project involves a research and demonstration program of cropland irrigation and soil conservation techniques for increasing potato yield and quality. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) for a two-year research and demonstration program was signed on April 22, 1991 between the Corps and the Maine Aroostook Water and Soil Management Board. The project sponsor must obtain all interests in real estate as determined by the Government and the project sponsor to be necessary for project implementation. The Government will reimburse the project sponsor 65 percent of project costs as work is accomplished, up to the Federal cost limit of $300,000. The LCA was amended on June 6, 1994 to include a third year of research and demonstration at an estimated Federal cost of $252,000. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Continued research at the University of Maine's farm in Presque Isle, Maine. 34. SEBAGO LAKE, STANDISH, ME Location. The town of Standish is located in southeastern Maine, about 15 miles northwest of Portland. Sebago Lake is Portland's primary water supply, and covers about 47 square miles with a total drainage area of 361 square miles. The erosion problem is located along the southerly end of the lake adjacent to Maine Highway Route 35. Existing project. Construction of stone slope protection along 1,000 linear feet of eroding shoreline. The project protects against continued erosion and possible collapse of Route 35. Work was completed in December 1996. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract for construction of emergency shoreline protection measures along Sebago Lake was awarded August 13, 1996. Work began in November 1996 and was completed the following month. Final contract amount was $662,315. 35. STAMFORD, CT Location. The Stamford Hurricane Barrier is located in Fairfield County on the north shore of Long Island Sound, about 30 miles east of New York City and 20 miles southwest of Bridgeport, CT. (See Geological Survey map for Stamford, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation, see Annual Report for 1974. Project was completed in 1969. Local interests still owe a substantial amount based on claims settlements, including interest payment under the Contract Disputes Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for $662,000 outstanding which is local share of final claims settlement including interest payment. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to replace the navigation gate hoist system was awarded April 11, 1995. The gate hoist system was delivered to the site in June 1996 and installation was completed in August 1997. Contractor earnings totalled $1,361,096 with final payment pending at FY end. 36. THAMES RIVER BASIN, CT, RI, AND MA Works covered by this plan are a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of Thames River in Massachusetts and Connecticut, within a radius of 45 miles from Norwich, CT, and a channel enlargement on Shetucket 1-18 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT River where it discharges into Thames River at Norwich. Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, approved plan for a system of reservoirs and channel improvements in Thames River Basin in accordance with House Document 885, 76th Congress, 3rd session, and authorized $6 million for initiation and partial accomplishment ofproject. Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944, authorized completion of approved plan. Flood Control Act of July 14, 1960, authorized project for West Thompson Reservoir, substantially as recommended in Senate Document 41, 86th Congress, 2nd session. Local flood protection project for West River, New Haven, CT was authorized under authority provided by Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-P on reservoirs and local protection projects, Thames River Basin, for projects comprising approved plan.) 36A. BUFFUMVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Little River, 1.3 miles above its junction with French River, and eight miles northeast of Southbridge, MA. Reservoir extends upstream about 1.7 miles northerly and 1.9 miles southerly. (See Geological Survey maps for Webster, MA and CT, and Leicester, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in September 1956 and completed in June 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 36B. EAST BRIMFIELD LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, 64.5 miles above its confluence with Shetucket River, and one mile southwest of village of Fiskdale, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Whales, MA and CT, Southbridge, MA and CT, East Brookfield, MA, and Warren, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1958 and completed in June 1960. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 36C. HODGES VILLAGE DAM, MA Location. Dam is on French River, 15 miles above its confluence with Quinebaug River, at Hodges Village in town of Oxford, MA, about five miles north of Webster, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Webster, MA, and CT, Leicester, MA, Worcester South, MA, and Oxford, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works, initiated in March 1958, was completed in December 1959. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Major rehabilitation: A contract to rehabilitate Hodges Village Dam was awarded August 5, 1997. Work began in October 1997 and was about 45 percent complete at FY end with contractor earnings of $7,186,874. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 36D. MANSFIELD HOLLOW LAKE, CT Location. Dam is at Mansfield Hollow, CT, on Natchaug River, 5.3 miles above its confluence with Willimantic River. It is four miles northeast of city of Willimantic, CT. (See Geological Survey maps for Spring Hill and Willimantic, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam, initiated in 1949, was completed in May 1952. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 36E. WEST THOMPSON LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, in town of Thompson, CT. Site is in village of West Thompson, two miles upstream from city of Putnam, CT. (See Geological Survey map, for Putnam, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam, road relocation, and appurtenances was initiated in August 1963 and completed in October 1965. Initial phase of recreation facilities was completed in May 1976. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. 1-19 REPORT OF THE SECRE'ARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 36F. WESTVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, 56.7 miles above its confluence with Shetucket River, in towns of Sturbridge and Southbridge, MA, and 1.3 miles west of center of Southbridge. (See Geological Survey maps for Southbridge, MA and RI, and East Brookfield, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in April 1960 and completed in August 1962. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 37. TOWN BROOK, QUINCY AND BRAINTREE, MA Location. The project is located in the city of Quincy and the town of Braintree on the south side of Massachusetts Bay, along the eastern shore of Massachusetts, seven miles south of Boston in Norfolk County. The watershed is approximately 4.5 square miles. Existing project. Project provides for the construction of a 12-foot diameter, 4,060-foot long, concrete lined tunnel in bedrock approximately 140 to 180 feet below ground, intake and outlet structures, and improvements to the Town River downstream of the outlet shaft. The tunnel and its appurtenances will be supplemented by reconstruction of the Old Quincy Reservoir Dam, located at the headwaters of Town Brook. Reconstruction work includes a new spillway and outlet structure. The estimated total project cost (October 1998) is $40,800,000, and includes $6,100,000 in approved credit for compatible work that has been accomplished by the project sponsor. Total project costs do not include dam safety measures at Old Quincy Dam, which are estimated at $9,000,000 and are a non-Federal responsibility. Construction of Town River improvements was initiated in December 1992 and completed in December 1994. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on July 7, 1992 between the Corps and the Metropolitan District Commission (MDC). The MDC is required to provide all lands, easements, and rights-ofway; pay all cost for dam safety measures at Old Quincy Dam to insure its structural integrity; pay a cash contribution for the costs allocated to flood control so that the total contribution of local interests is equal to 25 percent of costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacements. In addition, local interests must do the following: prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent encroachment on both the improvements and unimproved channels, and manage all project-related channels to preserve capacities for local drainage as well as for project functions. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract for construction ofthe tunnel was awarded September 15, 1993. Work on this contract began in January 1994 and was completed in January 1997. Contractor earnings totalled $21,210,108 with final payment pending at FY end. A contract for reconstruction of Old Quincy Dam was awarded Septemer 25, 1998. Work had not begun by FY end. 38. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS In accordance with provisions of the Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended, local flood protection works constructed with Federal funds are transferred to local interests to operate and maintain. To insure compliance with regulations prescribed for their operation and maintenance, regular inspections of the following projects were made during the fiscal year: CONNECTICUT: November 97 - Colchester/East Hampton; December 97 - Wethersfield; August 98 - Bridgeport, Danbury, Middletown, Milford, New London, North Canaan, North Fairfield, North Haven, Salisbury, Simsbury, Waterbury, Winstead, Woodbury; September 98 - Ansonia, Derby, East Branch Dam, East Hartford, Hall Meadow Dam, Hartford, Mad River Dam, Norwalk, Stamford, Sucker Brook Dam, Torrington, Waterbury. MAINE: September 98 - Beals, Belfast, Blaine, Campobello, Castine, Cherry field, Fort Kent, Gouldsboro, Harpswell, Hartland, Islesboro, Lubec, Machias, Machiasport, Millbridge, Ogunquit, Old Town, Pearly Brook, Perry, Whiting. MASSACHUSETTS: October 97 - Chicopee, Fitchburg, Gardner, Northampton, Springfield, West Springfield; November 97 - Blackstone, Charles River, Millbury; April 98 -Charles River, Chicopee, Fitchburg, Gardner, Three Rivers, West Springfield; May 98 - Lancaster; July 98 -West Warren; August 98 - Canton, Haywood Creek, Island Avenue, Point Shirley, Scituate, Town River Bay; September 98 - Amesbury, Haverhill, Lowell, Saxonville, Weymouth/Braintree, Worcester. NEW HAMPSHIRE: October 97 - Keene; Nashua. RHODE ISLAND: November 97 - Burrillville, Woonsocket. VERMONT: October 97 - Weston. 1-20 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT 39. FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS A coordinated system of flood control dams, all of which have flood control as primary storage available with recreation and/or water supply as secondary storages in most of the projects, has been established in five major flood producing basins in New England. During periods of flood flows, regulation of reservoirs is fully coordinated within each basin dependent upon its location in the watershed, its available storage capacity and origin of the flood. In addition to flood control releases, water supply, flow augmentation and hydropower releases were made from selected reservoirs. Winter pools are maintained at many projects to submerge the flood control gates and keep them from freezing. During FY 1998 there were three significant flood events. During March 1998 a storm system desposited 4 to 6 inches of rainfall over southern New England watersheds. River levels rose to just over flood stage within the Thames and Blackstone River basins. The second flood event occurred in April 1998 associated with a warm front bringing temperatures in the 70's to mid 80's causing rapid snowmelt within northern New England watersheds. Mainstem Connecticut and Merrimack, Rivers rose to just over flood stage. The third flood event occurred in June 1998 associated with a series of storms depositing 3 to 10 inches of rainfall over New England watersheds. Rivers within the Merrimack and Blackstone River basins rose above flood stage. Cumulative damages prevented, due to flood control operations at NAE reservoirs, totaled $73,749,000 during FY 1998. CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN Regulation for canoe or kayak activities occurred during FY 1998 at Otter Brook in March; Birch Hill, Tully, Littleville and Knightville in April; Ball Mountain and Townshend in April and September. Releases for hydropower from Colebrook Lake during non-flood periods of FY 1998 were controlled by the Hartford MDC. MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN Blackwater was regulated for canoe races in April 1998. THAMES RIVER BASIN Mansfield Hollow Lake was regulated for canoe races in June 1998, East Brimfield and Westville Lakes were regulated for a river race in April 1998. The latter two projects also supplied small releases for low flow augmentation to American Optical Co. during the summer months. 40. HURRICANE BARRIER OPERATIONS Five hurricane barriers are situated along the southern coast of New England, protecting coastal communities from tidal flooding associated with hurricanes and severe coastal storms. The Corps operates the navigational elements of the Stamford, CT and New Bedford- Fairhaven, MA barriers. The Fox Point, RI, the Pawcatuck and New London, CT barriers are operated by the local communities. A brief resume of operations for the fiscal year follows: STAMFORD BARRIER. The barrier gates were operated on 19 occasions for coastal storms during FY 1998. Total benefits associated with gate operations during FY 1998 totalled $1,012,000. NEW BEDFORD BARRIER. During FY 1998, the New Bedford Barrier was operated on 25 different occasions resulting in a total of $711,000 in benefits. FOX POINT HURRICANE BARRIER. The Fox Point Hurricane Barrier was not operated during FY 1998. PAWCATUCK HURRICANE BARRIER. The Pawcatuck Hurricane Barrier was not operated during FY 1998. NEW LONDON HURRICANE BARRIER.The New London Hurricane Barrier was not operated during FY 1998. 41. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205. Public Law 80-858, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 1-J) Snagging and clearing activities pursuant to Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. (None) Emergency Bank Protection activities pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act (preauthorization). (See Table 1-K) Project modifwcations for the improvement of the environmentpursuant to Section 1135, Public Law 99-662, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 1-L) Aquatic ecosystem restoration activities pursuant to Section 206, Public Law 99-662, as amended (p reauthorization). 1-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 FY costs were as follows: Coordination Account Preliminary Restoration Plans $ 3,891 13,383 Emergency flood control activities--repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Federal costs for FY were $78,771 for disaster preparedness and $263,859 for emergency operations. General Investigations 42. SURVEYS Costs for the FY for surveys from regular funds were $687,873 of which $259,105 was for two flood damage prevention studies; $242,098 for four special studies; and $186,670 for coordination studies. 43. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The District Engineer is the U.S. member on the Saint Croix River Board of Control. Annual inspections are made of conditions on the Saint Croix River and basic hydrologic information is compiled. A report of operations and development in the basin was prepared in cooperation with Canadian counterparts. Total costs for the FY were $5,315. Total costs to September 30,1998 are $365,319. Concerns about fluctuating water levels on Spednik and East Grand Lakes and its adverse effects on fisheries and recreation were raised at two public meetings held by the International Joint Commission (IJC) in August 1992. These lakes are currently operated in conjunction with downstream hydropower facilities. The IJC has requested that the Saint Croix River Board of Control reexamine the Orders of Approval for Spednik and East Grand Lakes. A range of lake levels and minimum flow releases will be studied to assist the IJC in developing new operational procedures for these lakes which increase recreational opportunities, enhance the environment and improve water level and flow regulation. Total costs for FY were $4,000. Total costs to September 30, 1998 are $105,219. The Gulf of Maine Council on the Marine Environment was established in 1989 under an agreement signed by the Governors ofMaine, New Hampshire and Massachusetts, and the Premiers of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. The Council was tasked under this agreement to develop consistent policies, initiatives and programs designed to protect and conserve the shared natural resources of the Gulf of Maine. In April 1993, the Council requested the New England District Engineer to participate in this international program as an "observer" to the Council. In this capacity, the District Engineer is expected to attend Council meetings and support their initiatives to the extent possible. In addition to the District Engineer's direct participation, a representative of the Corps is a member of the Working Group to the Council, which implements directives of the Council. The Corps representative on the Working Group is assisting the Habitat Sub-Group to establish policies, set priorities and identify lead agencies for implementing habitat restoration projects in the Gulf of Maine. This effort includes investigating potential habitat restoration sites eligible for Corps participation under Section 1135 and coordination of input from other Federal agencies. Total costs for the FY were $7,194. Total costs to September 30, 1998 are $89,246. Flood plain studies comprise compilation and dissemination, upon responsible local request, of information on floods and potential flood damages, including identification of areas subject to inundation by floods of various magnitudes and frequencies, and general criteria for guidance in use of flood plain area; and engineering advice to local interests for their use in planning to ameliorate flood hazard. Total costs for the FY were $318,649. Total costs to September 30, 1998 are $9,532,115. The April 1987 flood was one of the largest of recent times in New England, resulting in spillway discharge at six Corps flood control reservoirs. A comprehensive hydrologic analysis of this flood event is needed to develop abase of information for use in future planning and design studies, as well as reservoir operation. Fiscal year 1998 funds were used to conduct hydrologic analysis of the 1987 flood within the Merrimack River Basin. Total costs for the FY were $12,073. Total costs to September 30, 1998 are $94,761. 44. PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (None.) 45. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Preconstruction Engineering and Design costs were $22,219 for work on the Rochester, NH stormwater management project. 1-22 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 Sep. 30,1998 1. Andrews River, MA (Contributed Funds) Aunt Lydia's Cove Chatham, MA (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds - Other) 3. Boston Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds - Other) 4. Cape Cod Canal, MA (Contributed Funds) Chatham (Stage) Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 51,954 52,248 747,000 645,310 184,019 51,826 10,110 9,489 28,921 94,674 13,200 13,200 40,183 150,700 -88,000 103,006 -41,606 36,000 75,881 97,000 102,804 212,000 206,087 220,898 215,052 -1,000 85 1,377 7,951 58,500 58,297 219,042 219,042 850,223 850,020 187,500 187,500 - 1,048,798 9,000 1,033,189 43,800 43,000 850 57,000 57,000 184,019 92,010 62,700 62,250 553,000 5,135,000 31,044,974 3 155,021 2,490,178 28,002,173 3 167,564 16,090,100 27,063,291 4 137,468 5,215,744 16,158,773 4 - 1,260,00 - 254,60 90,000 2,055,00 34,917 212,51 5,958,000 7,324,656 6,540,254 7,322,857 0 1,260,000 3 254,603 0 2,145,000 0 247,427 - 21,798,322 1,2 - 21,798,322 1,2 9,833,620 7,137,492 160,388,882 9,637,583 7,463,679 160,328,658 115,432 115,432 390,677 390,677 180,796 182,188 6,768 6,768 19,200 19,200 - 26,609,000 - 26,609,000 - 266,705 1,2 - 266,705 1,2 252,500 4,345,963 251,873 4,345,285 43,500 43,500 1-23 5. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1998 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 Sep. 30, 1998 6. Cocheco River, NH 7. Cohasset Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds-Other) 8. Fivemile River, CT 9. Green Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) 10. Hyannis Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) (Contirbuted Funds-Other) New York Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. 7,288 7,288 52,686 52,685 601,920 74,215 23,343 23,234 45,667 117,421 45,667 117,316 Approp. 193,000 240,848 Cost 194,298 240,924 New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost 4,474 4,474 731 731 222,026 222,028 16,300 490,115 119,089 119,089 679,059 625,168 267,737 267,737 630,000 1,091,142 616,778 1,077,811 - 43,500 - 43,500 9,250 9,250 4,771 4,771 142,587 142,587 - 35,490 - 35,490 31,400 384,021 27,054 379,570 - 254,512 - 254,512 279,400 4,460,138 279,549 4,459,938 158,341 158,341 54,000 160,000 53,587 145,899 2,119 12,119 55,000 53,000 155,000 1,770,000 2,613,921 187,745 1,726,077 2,564,403 10,810 12,674 -8,835 29,965 231,200 1,233,863 227,621 1,230,148 732,500 161,218 127,000 330 367,900 3,025 New Work Contrib. Cost 129,757 129,757 1,103,828 532,546 127,000 330 367,900 3,025 1-24 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 Sep. 30, 1998 11. Kennebec River, ME 12. Patchogue River, CT (Contributed Funds) 13. Plymouth Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) 14. Portland Harbor, ME (Contributed Funds) 15. Providence River and Harbor, RI New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,599,940 1,599,940 32,426 32,426 10,500 10,394 26,143 138,422 26,143 137,942 36,361 35,696 1,000 1,356 170,376 212,467 170,376 146,916 - -90,000 -.- 58,165 57,802 124,518 59,935 5,530 5,429 176,556 242,054 -30,000 51,395 405,400 4,476,788 405,724 4,476,643 355,445 355,445 329,000 1,363,347 393,705 1,362,989 - 156,694 - 156,694 - 2,127,218 - 2,127,218 28,500 1,512,339 27,911 1,511,339 - 894,475 - 894,475 - 541,611 - 541,611 - 400 - 400 - 9,588,710 - 9,588,710 72,000 8,571,739 65,189 8,564,874 2,751 60,000 54,146 - 25,417,022 - 25,417,022 285,350 281,447 285,350 282,039 910,518 888,071 605,500 6,661,022 606,319 6,638,939 16. Salem Harbor, MA 17. Seekonk River, Providence, RI New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 18,260 18,260 27,637 5,036 5,036 7,355 20,980 19,795 650,000 45,161 87,800 83,067 9,901 1,693,202 1,693,202 745,627 739,709 900,000 130,804 1-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1998 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 Sep. 30, 1998 18. Sesuit Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) 19. Point Beach, Milford, CT (Contributed Funds) 20. Woodmont Beach, Milford, CT (Contributed Funds) 22. Allendale Dam, North Providence, RI 23A. West Hill Dam, MA 24. Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), MA 25A. Ball Mountain Lake, VT 25B. Barre Falls Dam, MA 25C. Birch Hill Dam, MA (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 226,306 226,306 23,452 132,000 25,075 132,587 209,703 205,229 -84,00 -57,673 -45,836 67,623 67,500 5,779 19,400 17,804 62,745 62,741 25,000 31,038 50,000 9,420 6,000 66,905 456,000 490,000 468,970 502,260 195,000 36,784 528,000 528,434 144,800 1,103,206 143,950 1.102,147 20,000 23,148 124,588 124,588 400,103 399,826 100,000 100,000 20,000 1,248,946 47,716 1,236,082 623,843 5 623,843 5 268,500 109,468 2,306,902 6 2,306,902 6 573,000 8,704,698 562,653 8,689,274 8,606,000 8,606,000 172,000 125,000 157,182 137,117 138,000 141,839 154,000 2,466,343 155,700 2,464,575 -453 1,478 11,107,842 7 11,107,842 7 1,241,000 1,117,000 1,061,677 1,289,755 780,000 692,811 651,000 12,749,723 775,410 12,739,300 1,967,819 1,967,819 608,000 366,000 602,755 381,741 534,000 377,657 363,000 8,798,060 485,082 8,763,705 - 4,815,679 8 - 4,815,679 8 477,621 359,000 414,558 421,872 588,000 534,619 428,000 9,419,050 463,246 9,381,851 - 32,000 9 - 32,000 9 1-26 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 Sep. 30, 1998 25D. Colebrook River Lake, CT 25E. Conant Brook Dam, MA 25F. Knightville Dam, MA 25G. Littleville Lake, MA 25H. 251. 25J. North Hartland Lake, VT North Springfield Lake, VT Otter Brook Lake, NH 25K. Surry Mountain Lake, NH 25L. Townshend Lake, VT 25M. Tully Lake, MA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost - 14,263,971 - 14,263,971 400,000 452,500 422,268 459,149 162,000 181,500 158,252 191,461 513,000 359,000 551,363 350,506 283,000 254,500 318,901 248,535 477,000 456,000 484,522 499,408 498,000 532,000 503,427 550,692 702,000 395,000 638,950 465,319 698,000 495,000 624,876 594,258 381,000 380,737 138,000 136,565 371,000 374,009 373,000 332,181 513,000 516,594 733,000 743,363 449,000 449,211 562,000 558,441 393,000 6,048,527 387,628 6,035,857 134,000 2,527,697 133,134 2,521,903 509,000 10,379,446 498,589 10,358,687 393,000 7,352,427 439,018 7,344,650 686,200 9,222,243 698,087 9,202,196 583,008 13,565,157 573,045 13,539,564 547,000 9,171,297 543,730 9,164,231 653,200 9,950,691 651,630 9,943,193 -7,547 24,638 1,226,000 709,000 725,796 933,559 624,000 899,401 610,000 11,826,418 653,801 11,818,531 - 1,666,752 16 - 1,666,752 16 1-27 2,950,530 2,950,530 3,415,640 10 3,415,640 10 7,013,412 7,013,412 7,312,225 11 7,312,225 11 6,831,526 12 6,831,526 12 4,360,448 13 4,360,448 13 2,833,610 14 2,833,610 14 8,540,545 15 8,540,545 15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1998 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 Sep. 30, 1998 Tully Lake, MA (continuedi) (Contributed Funds) 25N. Union Village Dam, VT 26. Faulkner Island, CT 27. Galilee Salt Marsh, RI (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds - Other) 28A. Black Rock Lake, CT 28B. Hancock Brook Lake, CT 28C. Hop Brook Lake, CT 28D. Mad River, Waterbury (Woodtick Area), CT (Contributed Funds) 28E. Northfield Brook Lake, CT Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 675,000 519,000 610,127 583,878 497,000 297,000 485,139 320,280 146,000 209,000 66,531 126,484 - 422,025 92,500 3,336 727,501 70,530 413,000 409,903 342,000 342,801 - 1,500,000 - 151,088 705,000 842,390 7,975 415,235 19,499 716,122 374,000 8,843,725 387,723 8,835,385 - 40,000 9 - 40,000 9 - 4,095,160 17 - 4,095,160 17 388,600 8,204,993 381,376 8,194,323 - 1,500,000 247,445 398,533 5,000 1,279,000 17,032 1,266,433 5,275 29,540 430,000 420,510 839,500 819,527 - 8,182,300 - 8,182,300 374,000 230,000 379,242 238,957 383,000 385,956 316,000 5,516,581 299,410 5,495,213 - 4,178,911 - 4,178,911 151,000 191,000 138,714 204,310 170,000 173,965 205,000 2,729,934 179,395 2,702,746 6,151,562 18 6,151,562 18 725,000 627,000 764,775 648,754 99,918 650,000 96,703 402,344 362,000 50,324 383,000 321,000 346,178 359,137 796,000 817,097 230,946 465,596 183,949 290,000 262,438 884,000 14,729,825 864,285 14,700,160 -40,084 1,385,780 -21,914 1,385,780 -91,817 35,910 270,183 270,183 - 2,850,512 19 - 2,850,512 19 334,000 5,219,708 346,340 5,198,424 1-28 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 Sep. 30, 1998 28F. Thomaston Dam, CT 29A. Blackwater Dam, NH 29B. Edward MacDowell Lake, NH 29C. Franklin Falls Dam, NH 29D. Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH 30. New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, MA (Contributed Funds) 31. Quonset Point, Davisville, RI (Contributed Funds) 32. Roughans Point, Revere, MA (Contributed Funds) 33. Saint John River Basin, ME New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 747,000 557,000 845,979 682,175 563,000 571,955 - 14,282,112 - 14,282,112 472,000 10,396,342 423,367 10,345,560 1,319,746 20 1,319,746 20 430,000 339,000 399,252 377,727 367,000 388,817 369,000 6,545,094 370,261 6,541,315 2,014,253 21 2,014,253 21 340,000 339,000 337,895 350,373 503,000 679,000 624,132 646,800 1,089,000 1,567,000 1,073,901 1,623,838 278,000 330,000 250,174 346,224 194,419 97,520 375,000 341,020 473,704 491,588 1,407,022 1,429,473 665,000 684,548 525,000 136,396 380,000 14,400 424,000 7,569,569 442,317 7,549,527 - 7,950,487 2 - 7,950,487 22 853,000 12,238,086 880,278 12,223,946 - 21,452,440 23 - 21,452,440 23 948,000 18,595,592 906,863 18,549,342 - 11,510,088 - 11,510,088 183,800 7,190,621 186,510 7,189,896 - 6,513,763 24 - 6,513,763 2 - 2,400,000 1,889,590 2,346,743 702,000 1,082,000 804,377 818,777 - 710,000 2,171,000 1,766,000 5,716,779 10,320 417,252 168,378 2,623,273 4,262,640 - - 1,400,000 - 1,400,000 - - - 777,689 777,689 42,487 149,976 2,874 857 517,000 447,381 1-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1998 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 Sep. 30, 1998 34. Sebago Lake, Standish, ME (Contributed Funds) 35. Stamford, CT (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds - Other) 36A. Buffumville Lake, MA 36B. East Brimfield Lake, MA 36C. Hodges Village Dam, MA 36D. Mansfield Hollow Lake, CT 36E. West Thompson Lake, CT 36F. Westville Lake, MA New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 75,000 67,868 120,000 37,283 40,000 300,000 392,082 118,917 159,171 875,000 406,000 1,281,000 391,055 756,979 1,323,441 191,000 500,000 500,000 349,917 342,755 9,911,300 9,900,640 382,000 7,433,191 471,079 7,397,194 3,367,970 25 3,367,453 25 210,000 209,969 2,998,603 26 2,998,603 26 515,000 326,500 486,733 355,781 358,000 366,233 408,000 7,386,016 410,116 7,381,476 7,057,043 27 7,057,043 27 394,000 357,000 389,489 367,695 320,000 316,086 322,000 6,519,439 323,170 6,514,250 4,461,268 28 4,461,268 28 926,000 660,000 896,772 694,181 454,000 456,138 364,000 10,723,947 361,427 10,715,243 - 2,000,000 7,419,000 9,419,000 - 342,810 8,855,338 9,198,148 - - - 6,447,164 29 - - - 6,447,164 29 656,000 377,000 669,408 353,463 341,000 377,318 318,000 7,780,599 337,823 7,771,927 7,001,220 30 7,001,220 30 529,000 474,000 523,223 507,517 466,000 440,891 451,000 8,774,997 477,714 8,765,278 5,684,683 31 5,684,683 31 470,000 285,000 457,249 373,552 357,000 317,706 373,000 7,471,559 409,175 7,465,465 1-30 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 Sep. 30, 1998 37. Town Brook, Quincy New Work and Braintree, MA Approp. 7,811,000 1,759,000 3,210,000 657,000 28,736,740 Cost 9,036,625 6,031,294 2,150,058 1,320,304 28,271,659 (Contributed New Work Funds) Contrib. - 500,000 - - 2,735,000 Cost 445,045 825,863 470,804 268,538 2,426,114 (Contributed New Work Funds - Other) Contrib. 1,535,000 - 1,175,000 1,000,000 5,910,000 Cost - 787,662 - 480 961,029 1Excludes $ 6,138,157 from Public Works Funds and $4,849,740 from Emergency Relief Funds. 2 Includes $389,929 Code 711 funds and $511,089 Code 713 funds. 3 Excludes $935,303 Emergency Relief Funds and $1,030,806 Public Works Funds. 4 Excludes $17,767 Contributed Funds. 5 Excludes $118,215 expended for work beyond scope of project. 6 Includes $18,310 Code 711 funds. 7 Includes $504,062 Code 711 funds and $67,066 for fish passage facility. 8 Includes $618,469 Code 711 funds and $32,000 Code 713 Funds. 9 Recreational cost sharing. 10 Includes $199,303 Code 711 funds. " Includes $229,436 Code 711 funds. 12 Includes $59,536 Code 711 funds. 13 Includes $364,688 Code 711 funds. 14 Includes $470,077 Code 711 funds. 15 Includes $245,168 Code 711 funds and $1,117,494 for fish passage facility. 16 Includes $3,695 Code 711 funds and $115,138 Code 713 funds. 17 Includes $88,931 Code 711 funds. 18 Includes $143,538 Code 711 funds. 19 Includes $20,000 Code 711 funds. 20 Includes $2,881 Code 711 funds. 21 Includes $6,432 Code 711 funds. 22 Includes $4,671 Code 711 funds. 23 Includes $179,727 Code 711 funds. 24 Excludes $146,020 expended to date for land condemnation. 25 Excludes $199,410 expended to date for land condemnations. 26 Includes $71,943 Code 711 funds. 27 Includes $207,700 Code 711 funds. 28 Includes $6,255 Code 711 funds and $40,353 Code 713 funds. 29 Includes $68,717 Code 711 funds. 30 Includes $315,420 Code 711 funds. 31 Includes $67,667 Code 711 funds. 1-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1998 TABLE 1-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 14, 1960 as amended in 1965 July 14, 1960 as amended March 2, 1825 June 14, 1880 August 5, 1886 September 19,1890 July 25, 1892 July 13, 1892 June 3, 1896 March 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 July 25, 1912 August 8, 1917 August 30, 1935 3 Do. August 26, 1937 October 17, 1940 September 7, 1940 July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 October 23, 1962 November 28, 1990 October 31, 1992 ANDREWS RIVER, MA (See Section 1 of Text.) Channel six feet deep, 75 feet wide from deep water in Nantucket Sound to public marina; two jetties; three-acre maneuvering and anchorage basin. AUNT LYDIA'S COVE, CHATHAM, MA (See Section 2 of Text) Entrance channel 100 feet wide by 900 feet long and 9.5 acre anchorage area, both 8 feet deep. BOSTON HARBOR, MA (See Section 3 of Text.) Preservation of islands and seawalls. Wier River (Nantucket Beach Channel) 9.5 ft. deep. 100 ft. wide to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket. Fort Point Channel.' Wier River (Nantucket Beach Channel) 9.5 ft. deep. 150 ft. wide to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket. Wier River (Nantucket Beach Channel) from mouth of Wier River to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket Beach 12 ft. deep, 150 ft. wide. Channel 15 feet deep from Long Island to Nixes Mate Shoal (Nixes Mate to Nubble Channel). Channel 27 feet from Nantasket Roads to President Roads. Dredge Chelsea River channel to 18 feet. For 30-foot channel from sea to President Roads through Broad Sound by less direct route than 35 and 40-foot channels. For 35-foot channel from sea to Boston Naval Shipyard. Chelsea and Charles River Bridges. Elimination from project of removal of Finns Ledge at outer entrance. Dredge Chelsea River channel 25 ft. Depth of 40 feet (45 feet in rock) in Broad Sound Channel. Present project dimensions of channel from President Roads to Commonwealth pier No. 1, East Boston and anchorage area north side of President Roads. Present project dimensions of that part of approach channel to U.S. Navy drydock No.3 at South Boston between Main Ship Channel and U.S. harbor line. Chelsea River, channel 30 feet deep. Reserved channel 30 feet deep. Abandons seaplane channel authorized in 1940 River and Harbor Act (H.Doc.262,76th Cong., 1st sess.) Extension of President Roads anchorage. Reserved channel 35 feet deep, 430 feet wide, extending one Chelsea River Channel and Maneuvering Basin 35 feet deep. Deepen Mystic River and Reserved Channels to 40 feet; Chelsea River Channel to 38 feet; widen and deepen Inner Confluence Area to 40 feet. Deauthorizes portion of the 35-foot channel in Boston Inner Harbor lying easterly of the Charlestown waterfront authorized in 1902 River and Harbor Act. P.L. 86-645, Section 107. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 2, 1966. P.L. 86-645, Section 107. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, August 31, 1994. Annual Report, 1881, p. 518 H. Ex.Doc. 206,48th Cong., 2nd sess., Annual Report, 1885, p. 543. Annual Report, 1890, p. 503 Annual Report, 1893, p. 769 Annual Report, 1887, p.517 Annual Report, 1893, p. 766 H. Ex. Doc. No. 162,53rd Cong., 3rd sess.,Annual Report, 1895, p. 648 H. Doc. 133, 55th Cong., 2nd sess. Annual Report, 1898, p. 886. H. Doc. 119, 56th Cong., 2nd sess. Annual Report, 1901, p. 1096 Authorized by Chief of Engineers. March 11, 1913. H. Doc. 272, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. 2 H. Doc. 931, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess. 2 H. Doc. 244, 72nd Cong., 1st sess.2 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 29, 74th Cong., 1st sess. 2 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 24, 75th Cong., 1st sess. 2 H. Doc. 225, 76th Cong., 1st sess.2 Public Law 420,78th Cong. H. Doc. 244, 80th Cog., 1st sess.2 H. Doc. 349, 84th Cong., 2nd sess.2 H. Doc. 350, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. 2 Section 101, Public Law 101-640. Section 116(2), P.L. 102-580 1-32 TABLE 1-B (continued) NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents January 21, 1927 (Section 2) Included in Public Works Administration program, September 6, 1933 June 26, 1934 (Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act) Included in Public Works Administration program, April 29, 1935 Included in Emergency Relief Program, May 28, 1935. August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 March 2, 1945 September 19, 1890 March 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 as amended August 11, 1888 March 2, 1827 July 11, 1871 August 5, 1886 March 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 as amended in 1965 CAPE COD CANAL, MA (See Section 4 of Text.) Purchase canal from Boston, Cape Cod & New York Canal Co., in accordance with contract dated July 29, 1921, executed by that company. Construct three bridges and widen canal to 250 feet. Operation and care of works of improvement provided for the funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Construct a mooring basin. Dredging and bank protection. Existing project for main canal adopted. 15-foot channel and turning basin in Onset Bay. Extend East Boat Basin for an area of about 4.3 acres to a depth of eight feet. CHATHAM (STAGE) HARBOR, MA (See Section 5 of Text.) Entrance channel ten feet deep, 150 feet wide from Chatham Roads into upper harbor. COCHECO RIVER, NH (See Section 6 of Text.) Provides for a 3 mile long tidewater channel 7 feet deep and 60 to 70 feet wide. COHASSET RIVER, NH (See Section 7 of Text.) Anchorage in inner harbor 7 feet deep, and channel 90 feet wide, 8 feet deep from anchorage to outer harbor. Construstion of anchorage areas 6 feet deep. FIVEMILE RIVER, CT (See Section 8 of Text.) Entrance channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide from the mouth of the Fivemile River extending 6,000 feet upstream. (Upper 700 feet of entrance channel, which was never constructed, was deauthorized in October 1978. HYANNIS HARBOR, MA (See Section 10 of Text.) Breakwater. Present dimensions of breakwater. Dredging behind breakwater. Channel, anchorage and jetty. Deeping channel and basin to 13 feet, realigning the entrance channel through the outer harbor to straighten the approach, and widening the channel to 240 feet from the outer harbor through most of Lewis Bay and to 220 feet from there to the entrance of the Inner Harbor. H. Doc. 139, 67th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 795, 71st. Cong., 3rd sess. Do. Do. Do. Rivers and Harbor Committee Doc. 15, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 431, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 168, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 425, 77th Cong. 1st sess. Annual Report 1942. H. Doc. 74, 51st Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 425, 76st Cong. 1st sess. Annual Report 1904, p. 60. Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, October 12, 1965. H. Doc. 1419, 63rd Cong., 3rd sess. S. Doc. 32, 18th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 63, 41st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Ex. Doc. 96, 48th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 98, 77th Cong., 1 st sess. P.L. 86-645, Section 107. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, August 19, 1997. 1-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1998 TABLE 1-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents March 3, 1899 March 4, 1913 September 22, 1922 October 23, 1962 July 9, 1965 August 26, 1937 October 18, 1965 March 3, 1873 September 19, 1890 March 3, 1905 July 3, 1930 March 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 November 17, 1986 December 18, 1991 Intermodal Surface Transportation Infrastructure Act of 1991. October 12, 1996 July 14, 1960 as amended October 23, 1962 September 3, 1954 October 23, 1962 PLYMOUTH HARBOR, MA (See Section 13 of Text.) Beach protection. Annual Report for 1899, p. 1089. Dredging 18-foot channel. H. Doc. 1194, 62nd Cong., 3rd sess. Dredging 15-foot extension, inluding turning basin. H. Doc. 996, 66th Cong., 3rd sess. Rubblestone breakwater. Anchorages are eight feet deep H. Doc. 124, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. inside breakwater. Elimination of authorized 18-foot anchorage from existing project. Recreational development. PROVIDENCE RIVER AND HARBOR, RI (See Section 15 of Text.) Channel 35 feet deep from deep water in Narragansett Bay to H. Doc. 173, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Fox Point. Deepen 35-foot channel to 40 feet, and provide a 30-foot channel S. Doc. 93, 88th Cong., 2nd sess. from the upper end of the existing project to India Point at the mouth of the Seekonk River. (The India Point channel was deauthorized in November 1986.) SALEM HARBOR, MA (See Section 16 of Text.) Channel 8 feet deep and 300 feet wide at entrance to South S. Ex. Doc. 25, 42th Cong.,3rd sess. River, and construct a seawall and breakwater for the protection of Long Point. Extends channel 6 to 8 feet deep and 50 to 150 feet wide up H. Ex. Doc. 28, 51st Cong., 1st sess. South River. Channel 10 feet deep and 200 to 300 feet wide at entrance to H. Doc. 303, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. South River. Main Ship Channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide, and removal H. Doc. 112, 70th Cong., 1st sess. of shoal near Abbot Rock Beacon. Main Ship Channel 30 feet deep. H. Doc. 701, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. Main Ship Channel 32 feet deep and 300 to 400 feet wide. H. Doc. 31, 85th Cong., 1st sess. SEEKONK RIVER, PROVIDENCE, RI (See Section 17 of Text.) Removal of abandoned India Point Railroad Bridge. Section 1166(c), P.L. 99-662. Extends project authorization. Section 1085, P.L. 102-240. Increases total project cost. Section 301 (a) (13), P.L. 104-303 SESUIT HARBOR, MA (See Section 18 of Text.) Channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide. Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, February 6, 1980. POINT BEACH, MILFORD, CT (See Section 19 of Text.) Project involves raising the first floor of 58 shorefront and Section 103, P.L. 87-874. back shore residential structures above the estimated Authorized by the Chief of 100 year flood elevation. Engineers, November 6, 1995. WOODMONT BEACH, MILFORD, CT (See Section 20 of Text.) Widening to 100-foot width by direct placement of sand, 500 H. Doc. 203, 83rd Cong., 1st sess. feet of shore west of Mervin Point; widening 3,500 feet of shore from Chapel Street; and construction of 5 impermeable groins. Placement of suitable sandfill along approximately 1,500 feet Section 103, P.L. 87-874. of beach and reconstruction of groins. Mitigation to replace Authorized by the Chief of rocky habitat for Blue Mussels. Engineers, March 20, 1992. 1-34 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents October 31, 1992 October 12, 1996 October 12, 1996 November 17, 1986 June 30, 1948, as amended October 31, 1992 November 17, 1986 November17, 1986 July 24,1946 as amended November 17, 1986 ALLENDALE DAM, NORTH PROVIDENCE, RI (See Section 22 of Text.) Reconstruct dam. Increases total project cost. FAULKNER'S ISLAND, CT (See Section 26 of Text.) Construct 2,000 linear feet of stone revetment running along the entire east side of the Island and wrapping around the north and south ends. GALILEE SALT MARSH, RI (See section 27 of Text.) Restoration of 34 acres of salt marsh by installing two culverts under Escape Road and excavating channels. MAD RIVER, WATERBURY (WOODTICK AREA), CT (See Section 28D of Text.) Widen and deepen channel along two restricted areas of the Mad River totaling 1,450 linear feet. QUONSET POINT, DAVISVILLE, RI (See Section 31 of Text.) Construction of two elevated water storage towers and extension, rehabilitation and relocation of 6,000 feet of sewer line. ROUGHANS POINT, REVERE, MA (See Section 32 of Text.) Stabilize existing facilities along the shore with a 4,080-foot long armor stone revetment. Construct earth berm one-foot high and 200 feet long on existing median strip between Bennington Street and State Road. SAINT JOHN RIVER BASIN, ME (See Section 33 of Text.) Ten-year research and demonstration program of cropland irrigation and soil conservation techniques for increasing potato yield and quality. SEBAGO LAKE, STANDISH, ME (See Section 34 of Text.) Construct 1,000 linear feet of stone slope protection along the shoreline of Sebago Lake adjacent to Maine Highway Route 35. TOWN BROOK, QUINCY & BRAINTREE, MA (See Section 37 of Text.) Construct 12-foot diameter, 4,060-foot long, concrete lined tunnel in bedrock approximately 140 to 180 feet below ground; channel improvements downstream of the tunnel outlet; and reconstruction of Old Quincy Reservoir Dam located at the headwaters of Town Brook. Section 358, P.L. 102-580. Section 347, P.L. 104-303. Section 527, P.L. 104-303 Section 1135, P.L. 99-662. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers, January 13, 1995. Section 205,P.L. 80-858. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, December 21,1992. Section 362, P.L. 102-580. Section 401, P.L. 99-662. Section 1108, P.L. 99-662. Section 14, P.L. 79-526. Authorized by Chief of Engineers April 4, 1995. H. Doc. 39, 99th Cong., 1st sess. 1 A portion has been abandoned pursuant to P.L. 624, December 31, 1970. 2 Contains latest published maps. See also Annual Report, 1911, p. 1178 (seawalls and Nixes Mate Channel) and Annual Report, 1903, p. 770 (Fort Point Channel.) 3Authorized in part by Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 1933. 1-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1998 TABLE 1-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1998 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) Apponaug Cove, RI Bagaduce River, ME3 ,4 Bar Harbor, ME Bass Harbor, ME 6 Bass Harbor Bar, ME Beals Harbor, ME Belfast Harbor, ME Bellamy River, NH3,4 Beverly Harbor, MA Black Rock Harbor, CT Boothbay Harbor, ME Branford Harbor, CT Bridgeport Harbor, CT Bristol Harbor, Bristol, RI2 Bucks Harbor, Machiasport, ME 6 Bucksport Harbor, ME Bullocks Point Cover, RI Bunker Harbor, ME 6 Buttermilk Bay Channel, MA6 Camden Harbor, ME Canapitsit Channel, MA4 Cape Porpoise Harbor, ME Carvers Harbor, Vinalhaven, ME Cathance River, ME 3 Clinton Harbor, CT Coasters Island Harbor, RI 4 Cobscook Bay, ME 3,4 Connecticut River below Hartford, CT Corea Harbor, Gouldsboro, ME 6 Criehaven Harbor, ME Cross Rip Shoals Nantucket Sound, MA Cuttyhunk Harbor, MA Damariscotta River, ME4 Deer Island Thoroughfare, ME4 Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, MA Duck Island Harbor, CT Duxbury Harbor, MA East Boothbay Harbor, ME Edgartown Harbor, MA Essex River, MA Exeter River, NH4 Fall River Harbor, MA 1 Falmouth Harbor, MA Frenchboro Harbor, ME Georges River, ME Gloucester Harbor and Annisquam River, MA Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI15 Greenwich Bay, RI Greenwich Harbor, CT Guilford Harbor, CT Hampton Harbor, NH Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI Harraseeket River, ME4 Hay (West Harbor), Fisher's Island, NY 1964 1912 1932 1965 1920 1959 1971 1897 1951 1988 1953 1990 1983 1987 1976 1907 1996 1969 1985 1960 1899 1977 1964 1884 1985 1911 1866 1996 1984 1997 1954 1997 1906 1916 1968 1953 1997 1953 1978 1948 1913 1984 1978 1978 1978 1997 1989 1893 1969 1995 1996 1996 1896 1931 156,874 28,000 406,591 188,859 4,076 184,880 61,561 34,643 246,048 18,000 9,537 4,491,119 316,288 277,420 18,421 170,902 95,372 163,855 102,400 9,113 175,037 190,438 21,000 191,406 5,500 4,173 1.,550,185 26 797,954 40,776 24,200 27,168 5,000 40,000 94,584 482,166 421,297 6,500 65,614 21,759 62,454 6,164,757 123,763 657,345 25,788 1,296,934 189,037 2,000 198,758 137,222 200,000 576,856 30,963 8,401 57,469 39 2,187 37,672 20,382 143,077 303,157 28,427 1,672,093 42,668 1,925,607 2,186,627 32,092 22,133 410,630 32,906 235,138 196,489 12,279 361,364 33,827 1,090,484 13,161 17,619,752 100,469 517,617 54,328 1,442,447 23 905 5,792 390,124 412,764 2,422,540 32 17,238 62,980 119,181 8 3,032 2,168,867 336,549 24,616 312,414 1,725,599 604,821 3,719 225,972 1,920,667 2,266,307 2,827,638 30,069 38,462 1-36 104,583 7 100,000 147,887 123,757 69,323 20,000 130,410 11,643 35,000 28 10,000 35,000 25,000 100,000 25,500 193,761 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1998 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) Hendrick's Harbor, ME Hingham Harbor, MA Housatonic River, CT Ipswich River, MA Island End River, Chelsea, MA 6 Isle Au Haut Thoroughfare, ME Isle of Shoals Harbor, ME and NH Jonesport Harbor, ME Josias River, ME5 Kennebunk River, ME Kingston Harbor (North Plymouth), MA Lagoon Pond, Martha's Vineyard, MA 6 Lamprey River, NH 4 Little Harbor, NH Little Harbor, Woods Hole, MA 4 Lubec Channel, ME Lynn Harbor, MA Machias River, ME Malden River, MA20 Matinicus Harbor, ME Medomak River, ME Menemsha Creek, MA Merrimack River, MA Mianus River, CT Milford Harbor, CT 5 Moosabec Bar, ME Mystic River, CT Mystic River, MA Nantucket (Harbor of Refuge), MA Narragansett Town Beach, RI22 Narraguagus River, ME New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA Newburyport Harbor, MA New Harbor, ME 5 New Haven Breakwater, CT New Haven Harbor, CT 1 New London Harbor, CT Newport Harbor, RI Niantic Bay and Harbor, CT 6 Northeast Harbor, ME Norwalk Harbor, CT Owl's Head Harbor, ME 3,5 Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay and Watch Hill Cove, RI and CT Pawtuxet Cove, RI Penobscot River, ME Pepperell Cove, ME Pig Island Gut, ME 6 Pleasant River, ME Point Judith Pond and Harbor of Refuge, RI Pollock Rip Shoals, Nantucket Sound, MA Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, ME and NH 1957 1954 1983 1969 1983 1980 1977 1992 1995 1996 1895 1976 1913 1996 1906 1956 1956 1972 1922 1962 1953 1981 1940 1985 1989 1930 1957 1986 1989 1969 1997 1997 1966 1950 1995 1986 1953 1972 1954 1983 1968 1997 1975 1985 1969 1966 1892 1996 1956 1996 28,204 28,316 859,691 5,618 311,850 137,653 80,691 7,489,073 621,186 261,417 8,940 99,098 19,980 133,227 18,000 380,322 755,576 32,000 104,853 14,000 11 17,000 56,926 369,891 132,435 90,506 11,400 197,582 3,222,777 502,661 13 27,398 821,144 1,857,618 565,224 29 118,620 1,242,246 4,773,246 638,774 733,524 66,464 138,942 531,129 124,158 318,787 295,356 501,020 171,351 191,753 3,500 2,714,510 27 1,083,504 18,360,800 1-37 6,325 176,720 2,551,828 67,834 10,918 195,886 651,644 7,728 444,702 1,464,000 37,386 65,723 399,846 19,673 33,289 263,134 260,067 45,097 8,989 92,359 750,759 739,100 715,212 1,380,902 25,227 203,785 2,021,778 759,000 171,779 784,947 6,306,330 42,891 40,273 17,096,332 1,952,500 146,478 154,703 57,247 3,918,827 34,124 1,480,460 238,446 1,085,175 53,156 86,456 217 8,107,334 846,590 2,395,998 222,010 192,336 10to 832,119 79,668 24 88,917 80,990 62,000 12,500 46,500 11,380 14,000 20,385 7,015 14 65,139 34,500 4,383 20,000 295,356 17,587 4,437,665 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1998 TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1998 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) Potowomut River, RI Provincetown Harbor, MA5 Richmond Harbor, ME 4 Richmond's Island Harbor, ME 4 Rockland Harbor, ME Rockport Harbor, MA Rockport Harbor, ME 3 Royal River, ME5 Rye Harbor,NH Saco River, ME 5 St. Croix River, ME Sakonnet Harbor, RI 5 Sakonnet River, RI Sandy Bay (Harbor of Refuge), Cape Ann, MA '8 Sasanoa River, ME 3,4 Scarboro River, ME Scituate Harbor, MA Searsport Harbor, ME Seekonk River,RI South Bristol Harbor, ME Southport Harbor, CT Southwest Harbor, ME Stamford Harbor, CT Stockton Harbor, ME 3,4 Stonington Harbor, CT Stonington Harbor, ME 6 Stony Creek, Branford, CT 6 Sullivan Falls Harbor, ME Taunton River, MA Tenants Harbor, ME Thames River, CT Union River, ME Vineyard Haven, MA Wareham Harbor, MA Warren River, RI Warwick Cove, RI 6 Wellfleet Harbor, MA Wells Harbor, ME Westcott Cove, CT Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT Weymouth Back River, MA Weymouth-Fore & Town River, MA 5 Wickford Harbor, RI 5 Wilson Point Harbor, CT 4 Winnipesaukee Lake, NH Winter Harbor, ME 6 Winthrop Harbor, MA Wood Island Harbor and the Pool at Biddeford, ME 5 Woods Hole Channel, MA York Harbor, ME 1882 1997 1883 1882 1976 1996 1989 1997 1991 1995 1950 1995 1909 1922 1915 1997 1997 1966 1954 1971 1962 1962 1980 1915 1959 1985 1995 1914 1948 1920 1967 1996 1943 1896 1890 1975 1995 1997 1978 1972 1944 1979 and 1983 1973 1895 1952 1976 1895 1995 1940 1997 5,000 3,889,577 20,000 119,844 1,948,462 1,808,745 32,000 336,704 130,342 1,064,983 179,550 764,651 38,427 1,925,553 35,000 392,635 379,851 572,568 672,214 89,593 59,213 19 180,042 892,824 33,000 377,328 898,500 112,487 19,871 442,895 18,750 1,471,919 146,855 27,186 95,997 5,000 155,430 157,634 360,973 55,960 19,308 48,740 30,194,613 233,410 54,177 7,500 162,937 8,992 733,272 230,000 239,654 50 1,053,966 1,808 537,778 295,378 274,666 1,777,1555 30 719,718 2,907,055 64,685 392,280 13,578 16,060 124 2,735,388 1,132,287 83,170 868,373 43,923 434,335 90,085 1,832,247 34,376 157,273 16,558 813,197 32,917 20,854 1,667,740 367,975 26,806 42,891 116,049 1,858,413 2,038,708 347,248 205,744 27,353 1,723,621 162,650 29,870 22,538 38,515 605,495 55,614 1,116,848 1-38 797,847 51,430 49,562 31 61,338 17 74,996 19,892 21,928 10,000 69,976 16 67,792 2,567 18,285 7,501 169,636 85,176 133,985 21 32,000 212,000 21,000 20,000 630,133 49,094 25 43,660 32,161 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Projects are completed unless otherwise noted. 1 Completed except for inactive portion. 2 Inactive. 3 Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Congress, 1st session. 4 No commerce reported. 5 Portion of project authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 86-645, Sec. 107). 6 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers (Public Law 86-645, Sec. 107). ' Construction of a public landing by local interests has not been completed. 8 Excludes $5,000 Contributed Funds expended. 9 Excludes $37,200 Contributed Funds, Other. 10 Excludes $582,188 Contributed Funds, Other. 11 Excludes $114,327 expended for rehabilitation; breakwater repaired in 1962. 12 Excludes 173,425 Contributed Funds, Other. 13 Excludes $211,649 expended for minor rehabilitation; jetty repaired in 1963. 14 Public landing at Back Cove has not been constructed. 15 Improvement adequate for commerce. 16 Costs to local interests for berth improvements are estimated to be $60,000. 17 Excludes $81,548 Contributed Funds, Other. is Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 411, 64th Congress, 1st session, and in River and Harbor Committee Doc. 3, 65th Congress, 1st session. 19 Excludes $37,714 Emergency Relief Funds. 20 Under State maintenance. 21 Excludes $10,000 Contributed funds, Other. 22 Lack of local sponsor. (Project authorized by Section 361 of WRDA 1992.) 23 Excludes $50,000 Contributed Funds. 24 Excludes $17,495 non-project cost for removal of mooring chains, of which the project sponsor still owes $12,198. 25 Excludes $10,000 Contributed Funds. 26 Excludes $60,000 expended for major rehabilitation. 27 Excludes $1,926,000 expended for rehabilitation. 28 Excludes $65,000 consisting of $13,000 for public wharf and $52,000 for additional construction. 29 Excludes $1,415,524 for major rehabilitation and $80,357 Contributed Funds expended. 30 Excludes $20,00 Contributed Funds, Others. 31 Excludes $18,000 Contributed Funds, Others. 32 Excludes $571,401 Contributed Funds expended. 1-39 REPORT OF THE SECREfTARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1998 TABLE 1-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to Amount See Annual Sep. 30, 1998 Expended by Project Report For Construction Local Interest Burial Hill Beach, Westport, CT 1958 $ 5,810 $ 11,612 Calf Pasture Beach Park, Norwalk, CT 1964 56,386 120,179 Clark Point Beach, New Bedford, MA 5 1982 228,081 228,080 Cliff Walk,Newport, RI1 1995 1,155,491 955,237 Compo Beach, Westport, CT 1962 84,544 169,089 Cove Island, Stamford, CT 1961 47,131 94,262 Cummings Park, Stamford, CT 1963 26,886 53,771 Guilford Point Beach (Jacobs Beach), Guilford, CT 1961 15,620 31,241 Gulf Beach, Milford, CT 1958 21,303 42,606 Hammonasset Beach, Madison, CT 1956 163,183 326,366 Hampton Beach, Hampton, NH 1966 260,868 385,641 Jennings Beach, Fairfield, CT 1956 14,401 28,802 Lighthouse Point Park (Area 9), CT 1961 3,930 7,859 Lynn-Nahant Beach, MA 4 1986 50,000 Middle Beach, CT 1958 8,810 17,620 Misquamicut Beach, Westerly, RI 2 1963 14,512 29,024 North Scituate Beach, Scituate, MA 1969 106,552 106,552 Oak Bluffs Town Beach, Martha's Vineyard, MA 5 1976 273,334 198,583 Oakland Beach, Warwick, RI 1982 559,200 181,175 Plum Island, MA 5 1977 118,882 104,875 Prospect Beach, West Haven, CT 6 1995 1,870,407 1,089,351 Quincy Shore Beach, Quincy, MA 1962 621,464 1,242,880 Revere Beach, MA 1994 3,889,016 2,197,312 Roosevelt Campobello International Park, Lubec, ME 1993 233,260 Sand Hill Cove Beach, RI 1959 40,143 82,000 Sandy Point Outfall, West Haven, CT5 1996 889,634 457,495 Sasco Hill Beach, Fairfield, CT 1961 23,759 47,518 Sea Bluff Beach, West Haven, CT 5 1995 677,170 237,628 Seaside Park, CT 1958 150,000 329,921 Sherwood Island State Park, Westport, CT 6 1983 1,186,830 889,330 Short Beach, CT 3 1956 Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, CT 1964 62,560 270,695 Southeast Lighthouse, Block Island, RI 1995 1,648,249 970,000 Southport Beach, CT 1960 17,631 35,263 Town Beach, Plymouth, MA 1964 5,490 10,981 Wallis Sands State Beach, Rye, NH 1966 65,131 435,942 Wessagusset Beach, Weymouth, MA 1971 180,944 200,208 Winthrop Beach, MA 1960 176,567 353,134 Projects are completed unless otherwise noted. 1 Complete except inactive portion. 2 Additional Federal participation will be required based on Public Law 87-874, Sec. 103. 3 Project completed at no cost to Federal Government by using fill from Federal navigation improvement at Housatonic River. (See page 88 of the 1956 Annual Report.) 4 Inactive. 5 Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 87-874, Sec. 103.) 6 Portion authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 87-874, Sec. 103.) 1-40 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1998 For Last Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Alford, Green River, MA 3 Alley Bay, Beals, ME3 Amesbury, Powwow River, MA 3 Ansonia - Derby, CT Bagaduce River, ME 3 Beaver Brook, Keene, NH 2 Blackstone River, Millbury, MA 3 Bluffs Community Center, Swansea, MA 3 Bound Brook, Scituate, MA4 Canton, MA 2 Charles River Dam, MA Charlestown, NH 3 Cherryfield, ME 2 Chicopee, MA Chicopee Falls, MA Clear River, Burrillville, RI 3 Cocheco River, Famington, NH 2 Connecticut River, Middletown, CT3 Connecticut River, North Stratford, NH 3 Connecticut River, W. Stewartstown, NH 3 Covered Bridge, Sheffield, MA3 Danbury, CT Derby, CT East Branch Dam, CT East Hartford, CT Farmington River, Simsbury, CT3 Fitchburg, MA (See No. Nashua River) Folly Brook, Wethersfield, CT 2 Fort Kent, ME 2 Fox Point Barrier, RI Gardner, MA 2 Gulf Street, Milford, CT 3 Hall Meadow Brook Dam, CT Hartford, CT Hartford, White River, VT 2 Haverhill, MA Hayward Creek, Braintree-Quincy, MA2 Holmes Bay, Whiting, ME 3 Holyoke, MA Housatonic River, Pittsfield, MA 2 Housatonic River, Salisbury, CT 3 Housatonic River, Sheffield, MA 3 Huntington, MA 3 Island Avenue, Quincy, MA 3 Islesboro (The Narrows), ME 3 Johnson Bay, Lubec, ME 3 Keene, NH 4 Lancaster, Israel River, NH2 Lee, Housatonic River, MA 3 Little River, Belfast,ME 3 Lowell, MA Lower Woonsocket, RI Machias River, Machias, ME 3 Machias Bay, Machiasport, ME 3 Mad River Lake, CT 1977 1979 1978 1977 1985 1989 1986 1995 1974 1964 1981 1976 1963 1954 1978 1987 1963 1996 1982 1976 1988 1978 1977 1973 1951 1996 1979 1979 1976 1970 1991 1970 1960 1973 1940 1979 1980 1953 1985 1982 1981 1960 1983 1985 1985 1955 1997 1976 1990 1945 1977 1987 1995 1973 41,419 190,500 132,113 18,266,040 129,500 2,591,000 249,999 189,131 47,300 156,568 41,170,921 113,330 191,095 1,433,600 2,183,912 168,000 183,100 262,046 180,000 54,703 250,000 13,143,000 7,582,642 1,959,836 2,135,447 500,000 220,284 1,997,820 11,112,801 495,691 365,000 2,572,357 6,929,100 332,236 1,743,485 2,325,470 207,390 3,418,000 739,003 102,800 202,608 3,900 172,000 165,500 163,082 44,100 595,878 37,852 166,682 1,284,974 6,600,681 152,000 133,473 4,773,020 4,576 54,447 92,981 5,554,088 9 385 411,292 10 69,121 23 180,000 11 - 12 7,637 257,720 22 3,616,290 13 15,000 21,000 2,781,100 120,000 24,447 43,000 1,266,638 14 32,733 15 1-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1998 TABLE 1-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1998 For Last Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Marginal Way, Ogunquit, ME 3 Merriconeag Sound, Harpswell, ME 3 Mill Brook, Brownsville, VT 3 Narraguagus River, Milbridge, ME 3 Nashua, NH New London Hurricane Barrier, CT Nonewaug River, Woodbury, CT 3 Northampton, MA North Canaan, Blackberry River, CT 4 North Nashua River, Fitchburg, MA North Nashua River, Lancaster, MA 3 North Nashua River, Leominster, MA3 North Nashua River, Leominster (Sewer Line), MA3 Norwalk, CT 2 Norwich, CT Park River, Hartford, CT Pawcatuck, CT Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI 2 Penobscot River, Old Town, ME 2 Perley Brook, Fort Kent, ME 3 Pleasant Point, Perry, ME 3 Point Shirley, Winthrop, MA 3 Port 5 Facility, Bridgeport, CT 3 Prestile Stream, Blaine, ME 3 Riverdale, West Springfield, MA5 Salmon River, Colchester, CT3 Sand Cove, Gouldsboro, ME 3 Saugus River & Tributaries, MA 1 Saxonville, MA Sebasticook River, Hartland, ME 2 Shelburne, Androscoggin River, NH 3 Smelt Brook, Weymouth-Braintree, MA 2 South River, Conway, MA 3 Springdale, MA Springfield, MA Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, CT 3 Stony Brook, Wilton, NH 4 Sucker Brook Dam, CT Three Rivers, MA Torrington, East Branch, CT 2 Torrington, West Branch, CT 2 Town River Bay, Quincy, MA 3 Village of Saxtons, VT 3 Ware, MA 2 Waterbury-Watertown, CT 2 Weston, VT 4 West Branch, Westfield River, Huntington, MA 3 West River, New Haven, CT2 West Springfield, MA 5 West Warren, MA2 Winsted, CT Woonsocket, RI Worcester Diversion, MA 1987 1980 1988 1995 1950 1992 1985 1950 1977 1981 1979 1997 1997 1952 1960 1986 1966 1986 1986 1994 1987 1995 1986 1980 1996 1983 1984 1997 1980 1985 1977 1978 1987 1952 1950 1983 1973 1976 1970 1963 1963 1993 1985 1963 1963 1957 1983 1996 1992 1964 1954 1962 1978 243,000 107,682 110,000 132,967 270,000 6 8,504,919 7 222,500 960,000 73,865 4,605,000 81,671 152,756 221,455 52,150 1,209,000 60,176,919 644,311 3,174,260 178,045 70,990 189,000 500,000 227,500 73,674 1,905,261 247,100 127,500 5,525,000 4,218,700 1,857,475 37,657 1,803,738 133,500 700,000 932,000 116,296 19,500 2,227,792 1,577,189 389,237 228,237 55,228 140,500 400,000 265,300 13,000 119,433 3,883,293 2,043,728 389,200 245,500 4,033,100 5,086,896 24,893 16 327 2,015,709 21 50,919 73,818 17 214,106 20,554 18 182,419 221,614 24 19 5,350 58,800 - 20 18,409 748,840 25 14,343 41,000 224,476 70,161 1-42 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Projects are complete unless otherwise noted. 1 Inactive. 2 Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 80-858, Sec. 205). 3 Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 79-526, Sec. 14) 4 Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 83-780, Sec. 208) 5 Portion Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 80-858, Sec. 205). 6 Excludes $147,366 Flood Control and Coastal Emergency funds expended. 7 Excludes $852,127 non project cost per 1976 WRDA. 8 Excludes $727,460 Contributed Funds, Other. 9 Excludes $1,674,567 Contributed Funds, Other. ~0 Excludes $12,000 expended for land condemnations and $25,184 Contributed Funds, Other for relocations. E$1x cludes $1,146,828 Contributed Funds, Other. 12 Excludes $406,653 Contributed Funds, Other. 13 Excludes $245,000 expended for land condemnations. 14 Excludes $488,920 Contributed Funds, Other. 15 Excludes $11,758 for lands. 16 Excludes $6,120 for lands. 17 Excludes $259,408 Contributed Funds, Other. 18 Excludes $3,109 for lands. 19 Excludes $8,503 Contributed Funds, Other. 20 Excludes $565,168 Contributed Funds, Other. 21 Excludes $1,629,256 for lands and $303,251 Contributed Funds, Other. 22 Excludes $10,195 lands. 23 Excludes $24,134 Contributed Funds, Other. 24 Excludes $109,140 for land and $46,929 Contributed Funds, Other. 25 Excludes $554,638 for lands and $71,650 Contributed Funds, Other. TABLE 1-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTI-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER Cost to September 30, 1998 For Last Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Passamaquoddy Tidal Power Project, ME ' 1935 $6,384,394 1 Work discontinued in 1937. Facilities transferred to War Assets Administration. 1-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1998 TABLE 1-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Funds Expended For Last Full Report See Annual Date Contributed Project Report for Deauthorized Federal Funds Alternative for Sugar Hill Reservoir Andover Lake, CT Bagaduce River, ME (uncompleted portion) - Baker Brook, MA 1972 Bar Harbor, ME (uncompleted portion of 1888 & 1890 Acts) 1932 Beards Brook Reservoir, NH 1949 Beaver Brook Lake, NH 1973 Bennington Reservoir, NH 1949 Big River Reservoir, RI (portion of 1986 Act) 1987 Black Rock Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion of 1958 Act) 1986 Boothbay Harbor, ME (Portion of 1912 Act) - Boston Harbor, MA (1945 Act) 1997 Boston Harbor, MA (portion of 1902 Act) 1997 Boston Harbor, MA (Chelsea River portion of 1962 Act) 1997 Brant Rock Beach, Marshfield, MA 1961 Branford Harbor, CT (portion of 1902 of Act) 1990 Bridgeport Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion of 1930 Act) 1980 Bridgeport Harbor, CT (portion of 1946 Act) 1980 Bridgeport Harbor, CT (portion of 1958 Act) 1980 Brockway Lake, VT 1946 Cambridgeport Lake, VT Chicopee, MA (uncompleted portion) 1954 Claremont Lake, NH 1968 Clyde, RI 1948 Cocheco River, NH (portion of 1890 Act) 1997 Cohasset Harbor, MA (portion of 1945 Act) 1996 Cohasset Harbor, MA (portion of Section 107 project) 1996 Connecticut River (above Hartford), CT 1932 Connecticut River below Hartford, CT (uncompleted portion) 1979 Connecticut River below Hartford, CT (portion of 1950 Act) 1979 Cotuit Harbor, MA 1962 Dickey - Lincoln School Lakes, ME (portion of 1965 Act) 1984 Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, MA (uncompleted portion) 1968 East Boothbay Harbor, ME (portion of 1910 Act) 1953 Eastport Harbor, ME 1984 Edgartown Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion of 1965 Act) 1978 Fall River Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion of 1930 Act) 1984 Falmouth, MA (portion of 1948 Act) 1978 Fivemile River Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1969 Gaysville Lake, VT 1970 Gorton's Pond, Warwick, RI Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI (uncompleted portion of 1945 Act) 1983 Greenwich Harbor, CT (portion of 1919 Act) - Greenwich Point Beach, CT 1959 Guilford Harbor, CT (portion of 1945 Act) 1995 Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI (uncompleted portion of 1912 Act) 1983 Housatonic River, CT (uncompleted portion of 1888 Act) 1979 Honey Hill Lake, NH 1949 Ipswich River, MA (uncompleted portion of 1968 Act) 1969 Kennebec River, ME (uncompleted portion of 1902 Act) 1997 Aug 1977 Aug 1977 Oct 1978 Nov 1979 Nov 1986 Aug 1977 Apr 1978 Aug 1977 Nov 1990 Nov 1986 Oct 1992 Jan 1990 Oct 1992 Oct 1996 Nov 1979 Oct 1990 Nov 1979 Oct 1996 Oct 1996 Aug 1977 Aug 1977 Aug 1977 Dec 1970 Apr 1951 Oct 1996 Oct 1996 Oct 1996 Jan 1990 Oct 1978 Nov 1986 Oct 1978 Nov 1986 Jan 1990 Oct 1996 Nov 1983 Nov 1986 Nov 1986 Oct 1996 Oct 1978 Oct 1976 Nov 1991 Nov 1986 Nov 1990 Oct 1978 Oct 1996 Nov 1986 Nov 1979 Aug 1977 Nov 1986 Nov 1986 94,000 78,000 378,300 205,000 242,700 8,800 132,146 8,541 26,285,298 638,675 141,530 206,600 - 92,000 1-44 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Funds Expended For Last Full Report See Annual Date Contributed Project Report for Deauthorized Federal Funds Kennebunk River, ME (portion of 1962 Act) 1996 Oct 1996 Ludlow Lake, VT - Aug 1977 Lynn Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion of 1954 & 1935 Acts) 1956 Nov 1986 Manchester Harbor, MA 1949 Nov 1979 23,986 Marblehead Harbor, MA 1968 Oct 1978 43,711 Mattapoisett Harbor, MA 1950 Oct 1978 Merrimack River, MA - Nov 1991 Mianus River, CT (portion of 1945 Act) 1985 Nov 1986 Milford Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion of 1902 & 1937 Acts) 1981 Nov 1986 Monoosnoc Brook, MA 1967 Nov 1986 Monoosnoc Lake, MA 1967 Nov 1986 Mountain Brook Dam, NH 1949 Aug 1977 57,000 Mystic, CT 1968 Aug 1972 67,700 Mystic River, CT (uncompleted portion of 1913 Act) 1986 Nov 1986 Mystic River, CT (portion of 1913 Act) 1986 Oct 1996 Mystic River, MA (portion of 1950 Act) 1986 Oct 1996 Nantasket Beach, MA 1971 Jan 1990 Nantucket (Harbor of Refuge, MA (uncompleted portion of 1945 Act) 1965 Nov 1986 Nantucket, Harbor of Refuge), MA (uncompleted portion of 1880 Act) 1989 Jan 1990 Napatree Beach, RI - Nov 1979 Narragansett Pier, RI 1966 Nov 1970 115,590 Neponset River, Milton Town Landing to Port Norfolk, MA - Nov 1991 New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA (uncompleted portion of 1912 Act) 1953 Nov 1986 Newburyport Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion of 1945 Act) 1997 Nov 1986 New Haven Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion of 1946 & 1910 Acts) 1986 Nov 1986 Newburyport, MA (portion of 1910 Act) - Oct 1992 Nookagee Lake, MA 1976 Nov 1986 563,677 North Andover and Lawrence, MA 1949 Aug 1977 20,000 North Hampton Beach, North Hampton, NH 1963 Nov 1981 Norwalk Harbor, CT (portion of 1919 Act) 1983 Oct 1996 Norwalk-Wilton, CT 1973 Nov 1979 Patchoque River, Westbrook, CT (portion of 1954 Act) 1997 Oct 1996 Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay, RI and CT (uncompleted portions of 1896 Act) 1978 Nov 1986 Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay, RI and CT 1979 Nov 1979 (1960 Act) 1949 Nov 1977 Pepperell Cove, ME (uncompleted portion) 1969 Nov 1981 Phillips Lake, MA 1982 May 1997 300,000 Pleasant Bay, MA 1971 Nov 1986 Point Judith, RI 1968 Nov 1977 198,477 Pontiac Diversion, RI 1948 Apr 1951 24,200 Providence River and Harbor, RI (uncompleted portion) 1997 Nov 1986 Provincetown Beach (Herring Cove), MA 1961 Oct 1978 Provincetown Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 1997 Oct 1978 Rockland Harbor, ME (uncompleted portion of 1956 Act) 1976 Nov 1986 Saco River, ME (uncompleted portion) 1979 Oct 1979 Sakonnet Harbor, RI (uncompleted portion) 1982 Jun 1982 176,000 Salem Harbor, MA (inactive portion of 1958 Act) 1997 Jul 1995 Salem Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion of 1997 Nov 1986 1945 Act) 1-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1998 TABLE 1-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Funds Expended For Last Full Report See Annual Date Contributed Project Report for Deauthorized Federal Funds Sandy Bay, Cape Ann, MA (uncompleted portion) 1922 Oct 1978 Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, CT (uncompleted portion of 1954 Act) 1964 Nov 1986 - - South Coventry Lake, CT 1951 Aug 1977 96,000 - Southport Harbor, CT (portion of 1935 Act) 1962 Oct 1996 - - South Tunbridge Lake, VT - Aug 1977 - - Stamford Harbor, CT (2 projects uncompleted portions) 1979 Oct 1978 - - Stamford Harbor, CT (inactive portion) 1979 Jan 1990 - - Stonington Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion of 1950 Act) 1959 Nov 1986 - - Stonington Harbor, ME (1960 Act) 1961 Nov 1979 2,543 - Stony Creek, CT (portion of 1960 Act) 1995 Oct 1996 - - Stratford, CT 1973 Mar 1977 934,500 - Sugar Hill Reservoir, NH 1946 Dec 1944 - - Taunton River, MA (inactive portion) 1948 Jan 1990 - - Thames River, CT (uncompleted portion of 1945 Act) 1967 Nov 1986 - - The Island Lake, VT - Aug 1977 - - Thumperton Beach, Eastham, MA 1961 Nov 1979 Town Beach, Plymouth, MA (inactive portion) 1964 Jan 1990 - - Town Neck Beach, Sandwich, MA (portion of 1960 Act) 1961 Nov 1986 - - Trumbull Lake, CT 1983 May 1997 1,498,800 - Victory Lake, VT 1967 Aug 1977 168,400 - Wareham Harbor, MA (inactive portion) 1896 Jan 1990 Wareham-Marion, MA 1965 Aug 1977 81,715 - West Brookfield Reservoir, MA 1948 Jul 1960 67,000 - West Canaan Lake, NH 1948 Aug 1977 92,000 - Westerly, RI 1966 Nov 1986 - - Westfield, MA 1967 Sep 1969 507,200 - Westport, CT 1965 Feb 1970 29,634 - Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT (uncompleted portion of 1892 & 1954 Acts) 1972 Nov 1979 - - Westport River, MA 1942 Jan 1990 - - Weymouth-Fore and Town Rivers, MA (portion of 1965 Act) 1979 & 1983 Oct 1996 - - Whitmanville Lake, MA 1979 Jul 1995 605,023 - TABLE 1-H NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Contributed Funds Study Identification Costs Expended Coordination 942 Salem Harbor, Salem, MA 32,824 Saugus and Pine Rivers, MA 82,736 1-46 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-I BEACH EROSION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 103, PUBLIC LAW 87-874 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Contributed Funds Study Identification Costs Expended Morris Cove, New Haven, CT $7,974 Nantasket Beach, Hull, MA 35 - North Nantasket Beach, Hull, MA 37,065 $19,053 TABLE 1-J FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205 PUBLIC LAW 80-858 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Contributed Funds Study Identification Costs Expended Aroostook River, Fort Fairfield, ME $186,569 Black Rocks Creek, Salisbury, MA 27,326 Coordination 8,805 Farm River, East Haven, CT 29,631 TABLE 1-K EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 14, PUBLIC LAW 79-526 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Contributed Funds Study Identification Costs Expended Coordination $5,652 North Nashua River, Lancaster, MA 73,836 TABLE 1-L ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 1135, PUBLIC LAW 99-662 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Contributed Funds Study Identification Costs Expended Boyd's Marsh (Town Pond), RI $57,287 Coordination Account 7,068 - Fish Habital Restoration, Torrington,CT 7,248 - Initial Appraisals 6,482 - Sagamore Marsh, Cape Cod Canal, MA 57,474 1-47 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1998 TABLE 1-M BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, MA AND RI (See Section 33 of Text) RESERVOIR Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Black- Reservoir Lands stone Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages' Total West Hill2 Worcester,MA 25.8 51 Earthfill 12,400 $1,366,922 $940,000 $2,306,902 1 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2 See individual report for details. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Black- Lands stone and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Worcester, MA 48 Diversion tunnel and channel $4,923,500 $1,179,000 2 $6,102,500 Woonsocket, RI 15 Channel improvement 3,733,100 1,069,000 3 4,802,100 Lower Woonsocket, Flood wall, conduits and RI 13 channel improvement 8,356,239 435,000 8,791,239 Blackstone River, Millbury, MA 32 Slope protection 256,619 - 256,619 5 Clear River, Burrillville, RI 23 Retaining wall 168,000 - 168,000 Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI - Land acquisition 4,125,000 - 4,125,000 4 'Includes relocation. 2 $158,000 Federal; $1,021,000 non-Federal. 3 $300,000 Federal; $769,000 non-Federal. 4 $3,300,000 Federal; $825,000 non-Federal. 5 $250,000 Federal; $6,619 non-Federal. 1-48 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-N CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, VT, NH, MA AND CT (See Section 35 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Connec- Reservoir Lands ticut Height Capacity Constr- and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) uction Damages' Total Vermont: Union Village 2 White River Jct. 228.4 170 Earthfill 38,000 $3,186,860 $ 908,300 $4,095,160 North Hartland 2 White River Jet. 211.7 185 Earthfill 71,400 6,349,225 963,000 7,312,225 North Springfield 2 Springfield 191.3 120 Earthfill 50,600 4,781,526 2,050,000 6,831,526 Ball Mountain 2 Brattleboro 178.2 265 Rockfill- 54,600 10,757,842 350,000 11,107,842 earth Townshend 2 Brattleboro 168.3 133 Earthfill 33,200 6,662,545 1,878,000 8,540,545 New Hampshire: Surry Mountain 2 Keene 174.4 86 Earthfill 32,500 2,448,610 385,000 2,833,610 Otter Brook 2 Keene 171.2 133 Earthfill 18,300 2,982,048 1,378,400 4,360,448 Massachusetts: Birch Hill 2 Gardner 153.3 56 Earthfill 49,900 1,740,679 3,075,000 4,815,679 Tully 2 Athol 148.7 62 Earthfill 22,000 1,298,752 368,000 1,666,752 Barre Falls 2 Worcester 130.2 62 Rockfill- 24,000 1,928,819 39,000 1,967,819 earth Knightville 2 Northampton 102.8 160 Earthfill 49,000 2,594,440 821,200 3,415,640 Littleville 2 Northampton 102.0 150 Earthfill 32,400 5,863,412 1,150,000 7,013,412 Conant Brook 2 Springfield 122.0 85 Rockfill- 3,740 1,935,530 1,015,000 2,950,530 earth Connecticut: Colebrook River 2 Winsted 116.0 223 Rockfill- 98,500 8,341,971 5,922,000 14,263,971 earth Mad River Winsted 120.0 178 Earthfill 9,700 4,773,020 2,210,000 4 6,983,020 Sucker Brook Winsted 118.5 68 Earthfill 1,480 2,227,792 180,0003 2,407,792 1 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 3 Non-Federal cost. 2 For details, see individual report. 4 Non-Federal $670,000; Federal $1,540,000. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Connec- Lands ticut and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Beaver Brook, Keene, NH 170.4 Charlestown, NH 181 Chicopee, MA 80 Chicopee Falls, MA 83 Connecticut River, Middletown, CT 31 East Hartford, CT 52 Farmington River, Simsbury, CT 60 Folly Brook, Wethersfield, CT 50 Gardner, MA 163 Channel improvement Riverbank protection Wall and levee Wall and levee Streambank protection Wall and levee Streambank protection Channel improvement Dam and levee $ 2,591,000 113,330 1,434,000 2,600,000 331,167 6 2,143,084 757,720 220,284 510,691 - $ 2,591,000 - 113,330 $ 250,000 1,684,000 70,000 2,670,000 - 331,167 271,000 2,414,084 10,195 767,915 - 220,284 35,000 545,691 1-49 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1998 TABLE 1-N (Continued) CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, VT, NH, MA AND CT (See Section 35 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Connec- Lands ticut and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages1 Total Gulf Street, Milford, CT - Slope protection 386,000 - 386,000 Hartford, CT 52 Wall and levee 9,710,200 4 1,150,000 10,860,200 Hartford, White River, VT 216 Channel improvement 332,236 - 332,236 Holyoke, MA 85 Wall and levee 3,442,447 150,000 3,592,447 Huntington, MA 100 Riverbank protection 3,900 - 3,900 Israel R., Lancaster, NH 314 Gabion overflow weir 551,606 - 551,606 Keene, NH 167 Channel improvement 44,146 - 44,146 Mill Brook, Brownsville, VT 200.3 Streambank stabilization 110,000 - 110,000 Northampton, MA 94 Wall and levee 960,000 5 150,000 1,110,000 North Stratford, NH 345 Slope protection 180,000 - 180,000 Park River, CT 51 Conduit 58,876,919 1,300,000 60,176,919 Riverdale, MA 80 Wall and levee 2,126,875 ' 109,140 2,236,015 Salmon R., Colchester, CT 38 Slope protection 247,100 - 247,100 South River, Conway, MA 107 Slope protection 133,500 - 133,500 Springdale, MA 84 Wall and levee 700,000 57,000 757,000 Springfield, MA 76 Wall and levee 937,350 2 272,000 1,209,350 Three Rivers, MA 98 Wall and levee 1,577,189 700,000 2,277,189 Ware, MA 110 Channel improvement 400,000 85,000 485,000 Weston, VT 195 Channel improvement 13,079 2,000 15,079 West Springfield, MA 76 Wall and levee 2,043,452 3 30,000 2,073,452 West Warren, MA 111 Wall and levee 430,176 64,000 494,176 Winsted, CT 115 Channel improvement 245,500 30,000 275,500 1 To be borne by local interests. Also includes local interests portion of relocation. 2 Includes $355,000 Public Works Administration funds. 3 Includes $245,000 Public Works Administration funds. 4 Includes $835,000 Public Works Administration funds. 5 Includes $280,000 Public Works Administration funds. 6 Excludes $24,134 Contributed Funds, Other. 7 Excludes $46,929 Contributed Funds, Other. 1-50 TABLE 1-0 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN, CT AND MA (See Section 38 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS 1 Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Nauga- Reservoir Lands tuck Height Capacity Constr- and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) uction Damages 2 Total Hall Meadow Torrington, CT 41.0 73 Rock and 8,620 $2,572,357 $1,290,0003 $3,862,357 earthfill East Branch Torrington, CT 43.7 92 Earthfill 4,350 1,959,836 1,290,0003 3,249,836 Thomaston Torrington, CT 30.5 142 Rock and 42,000 6,382,112 7,900,000 14,282,112 earthfill Northfield Brook Torrington, CT 30.6 118 Earthfill 2,432 1,875,512 975,000 2,850,512 Black Rock Waterbury, CT 29.0 154 Earthfill 8,700 5,223,700 2,958,600 8,182,300 Hancock Brook Waterbury, CT 25.0 57 Earthfill 4,030 1,593,911 2,585,000 4,178,911 Hop Brook Waterbury, CT 15.9 97 Earthfill 6,970 2,701,562 3,450,000 6,151,562 1 For details of projects, see individual reports. 2 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 3 Includes cost of lands borne by local interests. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS 1 Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Housa- Lands tonic and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages 2 Total Alford, Green River, MA Ansonia-Derby, CT Covered Bridge, Sheffield, MA Danbury, CT Derby, CT Mad River, Waterbury 2,100,000 (Woodtick Area), CT North Canaan, Blackberry River, CT Pittsfield, MA Salisbury, CT Sheffield, MA Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, CT Torrington, East Branch, CT 111.0 13.0 96.0 56.0 12.0 35.0 83.0 133.0 76.0 96.0 43.0 51.0 Earth dike and stone slope protection Wall, levee, channel improvement and pumping station Stone slope protection Walls, channel improvement and bridge replacememt Walls, levees and pumping station Channel improvements Snagging and clearing project Stone arch culvert Gabionade with slope protection Stone slope protection Timber Bulkhead Dike and channel improvement $41,419 $ 41,419 18,266,040 1,178,000 19,444,040 430,000 13,143,000 - 430,000 1,862,000 15,005,000 7,582,642 647,000 8,229,642 1,448,087 122,452 1,570,539 73,865 739,003 102,800 202,608 116,296 389,237 85,000 73,865 824,003 102,800 202,608 116,296 389,237 1-51 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1998 TABLE 1-0 (Continued) HOUSATIONIC RIVER BASIN, CT RI AND MA (See Section 38 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS 1 Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Housa- Lands tonic and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages 2 Total Torrington, West Branch, CT 52.0 Walls, dikes and channel 228,237 - 228,237 Waterbury- Watertown, CT 32.0 Wall, dike and channel 263,300 - 263,300 1 For details of projects, see individual reports. 2 To be borne by local interests. Includes relocations. TABLE 1-P MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, NH, AND MA (See Section 39 of Text) RESERVOIRS 1 Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Merri- Reservoir Lands mack Height Capacity Constr- and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) uction Damages 2 Total Franklin Falls Franklin, NH 118.2 140 Earthfill 154,000 $ 6,190,487 $ 1,760,000 $ 7,950,487 Blackwater Concord, NH 118.8 75 Earthfill 46,000 766,746 553,000 1,319,746 Hopkinton- Everett Concord, NH 87.3 115 Earthfill 157,300 12,715,440 8,737,000 21,452,440 Edward MacDowell Keene, NH 161.3 67 Earthfill 12,800 1,708,253 306,000 2,014,253 Phillips Fitchburg, MA 105.4 48 Earthfill 1,600 13,450,000 7,350,000 20,800,000 1 For details, see individual report. 2 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 1-52 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-P (Continued) MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, NH AND MA (See Section 39 of Text) RESERVOIRS1 LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS1 Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Merri- Lands mack and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages 2 Total Amesbury, Powwow and 3.0 Wall and revetment $ 132,113 $ - $ 132,113 Merrimack Rivers, MA Haverhill, MA 21.0 Floodwall, conduit and 1,863,485 - 1,863,485 pumping station Lowell, MA 39.0 Wall and levee 490,600 5 90,000 580,600 Nashua, NH 55.0 Wall and levee 270,000 3,000 273,000 4 North Nashua River, 94.0 Stone slope protection 203,675 - 203,675 Leominster, MA North Nashua River, 94.0 Stone slope protection 295,273 - 295,273 Leominster (Sewer Line), MA North Nashua River, MA 100.5 Channel improvement 3,235,000 3 - 3,235,000 Saxonville, MA 69.0 Wall, levee, channel 4,218,700 530,000 4,748,700 1 For details, see individual report. 2 To be borne by local interests. 3 Excludes $1,370,000 Public Works Administration Funds expended on Fitchburg, MA. 4 Excludes $15,000 expended from Contributed Funds. 5 Excludes $794,374 Public Works Administration Funds. TABLE 1-Q THAMES RIVER BASIN, CT, RI AND MA (See Section 47 of Text) RESERVOIRS1 Nearest City Miles Above Mouth of Thames Height River (feet) Reservoir Capacity Type (acre-feet) Lands Constr- and uction Damages 2 Hodges Village Webster, MA 74.5 55 Earthfill 13,000 $1,317,268 $3,144,000 $4,461,268 Buffumville Webster, MA 74.4 66 Earthfill 12,700 2,157,603 841,000 2,998,603 East Brimfield Southbridge, MA 82.8 55 Earthfill 30,000 1,337,043 5,720,000 7,057,043 Westville Southbridge, MA 75.2 80 Earthfill 11,000 2,284,683 3,400,000 5,684,683 West Thompson Putman, CT 59.3 70 Earthfill 25,600 5,036,220 1,965,000 7,001,220 Mansfield Hollow Willimantic, CT 40.0 70 Earthfill 52,000 4,107,164 2,340,000 6,447,164 1For details, see individual report. 2 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 1-53 Name Estimated Federal Cost Total REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1998 TABLE 1-Q (Continued) THAMES RIVER BASIN, CT, RI AND MA (See Section 47 of Text) RESERVOIRS1 LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Lands Thames and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages 1 Total Norwich, CT 15.0 Channel improvements $1,209,000 $72,000 $1,281,000 West River, New Haven, CT - Channel improvements 4,619,543 2 554,638 5,174,181 1 Borne by local interests. 2 Excludes $12,590 for revisions to flood insurance rate map and $71,650 Contributed funds not required. 1-54 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-R RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Date Survey Date Survey Project Conducted Project Conducted CONNECTICTUT Black Rock Harbor Bridgeport Harbor Conn. River Below Harford Fivemile River Greenwich Harbor Guilford Harbor Mianus River Milford Harbor Mystic River New Haven Harbor New London Harbor Niantic Harbor Pawcatuck River Stamford Harbor MAINE Biddeford Pool Bucksport Harbor Carvers Harbor Harraseeker River Isle Au Haut Jonesport Harbor Josias River Kennegec River Kennebunk River Northeast Harbor Owls Head Penobscot Harbor Royal River Saco River Scarboro River Union River Wells Harbor May 1998 Oct 1997 Nov/Dec 1997 Nov/Dec 1997 Jun/Jul 1998 Jun 1998 Oct 1997 Nov 1997 Apr 1997 Oct 1997 Apr/May/Jun/ Jul 1998 Mar/Apr 1998 Jun/Jul 1998 Jun 1998 Jun/Jul 1998 Jan/Feb/Mar 1998 Sep 1998 Aug 1998 Oct 1997 Oct 1997 Oct 1997 May 1998 May 1998 Nov 1997/May 1998 Jul 1998 Oct 1997 May 1998 Mar 1998 Jul 1998 May 1998 May 1998 Jun 1998 MASSACHUSETTS Andrews River Annisquam River Aunt Lydia's Cove Bass River Boston Harbor Cape Cod Canal Chatman (Stage) Harbor Dorchester Harbor Duxbury Harbor Fall River Falmouth Harbor Green Harbor Hyannis Harbor Island End River Menemsha Creek Nantucket Harbor New Bedford Harbor Newburyport Harbor Plymouth Harbor Salem Harbor Scituate Harbor Sesuit Harbor NEW HAMPSHIRE Cocheco River Hapton Harbor Portsmouth Harbor RHODE ISLAND Bullocks Pt. Cove Little Narragansett Bay & Watch Hill Cove Pawtuxet Cove Point Judith Pond Providence River & Harbor Warwick Cove Jan 1998 Dec 97/Jan-Mar 1998 Feb/Mar 1998 Jul 1998 Dec97/Mar 1998 Oct-De 97/Jan-Mar 98 Jan/Jul/Sep 1998 Nov 1998 Jul 1998 Jan/Mar/Apr/May 1998 Jul 1998 May/Sep 1998 Nov/Dec 97/ Mar/Aug/Sep 98 Jan 1998 Feb 1998 Feb 1998 Jul 1998 May/Sep 1998 Jun/Jul 1998 Oct 97/Mar 1998 Jun 1998 Jan/Jul/Aug 1998 Apr 1998 Jun/Sep 1998 Nov 1997/ Mar/Apr/May 1998 Aug/Sep 1998 Jun/Jul 1998 Sep 1998 Oct/Nov 1997 May 1998 May 1998 Nov/Dec 1997 Major activities under the Dredged Material Management Program under PCS for FY 1998 were (1) monitoring surverys at the Portland, Cape Arundel, New London, Massachusetts Bay, and Sheep Island disposal sites (2) maintenance, replacement, and repositioning of disposal site buoys. Additionally, 7 monitoring study or special study reports were completed and distributed to the public and regional resource agencies. Total cost of contracts was $655,000. Labor costs of $130,000 for program management, sampling and testing, and environmental analysis were incurred. 1-55 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT * NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT This district comprises western Vermont, small portions of western Massachusetts and Connecticut, eastern New York including Long Island, and northeastern New Jersey, embraced in the drainage basins tributary to Lake Champlain and St. Lawrence River system east thereof and to the Atlantic Ocean from New York-Connecticut State Line to, but not including Manasquan Inlet, N.J. In addition it ex- Navigation 1 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. Aquatic Plant Control.................................................2-3 Fire Island to Jones Inlet, NY ..................................... 2-3 H udson River, N Y .................................. .................... 2-3 Hudson River at Athens, NY ................................... 2-4 Jamaica Bay, NY .................... ....... 2-5 Jones Inlet, NY .................................... ....... 2-5 Kill Van Kull & Newark Bay, NJ & NY .................... 2-6 Moriches Inlet, NY .................... .... 2-6 Narrows and Lake Champlain, NY..............................2-7 Newark Bay, Hackensack and Passaic River, NJ........2-7 New York Harbor and Adjacent Channels, (Port Jersey), NJ .................................... ...... 2-8 New York Harbor-Collection and Removal of Drift ....2-8 New York Harbor-Entrance Channels and Anchorage Areas...............................................2-9 New York and New Jersey Channels,......................2-10 Rondout Harbor, NY ............................................... 2-10 Shinnecock Inlet, NY ............................................. 2-11 Shoal Harbor and Compton Creek, NJ ...................... 2-11 Supervisor of New York Harbor................................2-12 Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys .................... 2-12 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ...................... 2-12 Navigation work under special authorization ............ 2-12 Beach Erosion Control 22. Atlantic Coast of Long Island, Jones Inlet to East Rockaway Inlet; Long Beach Island, NY .......... 2-13 23. East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, NY ............................. ................ 2-13 24. Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, NY .................... 2-13 25. Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook, NJ ......................... 2-15 26. Rockaway Inlet to Norton Point (Coney Island) NY................ ................................... 2-16 27. Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet, NJ ........................... 2-16 28. Other Authorized Beach Erosion control projects ........................................ 2-17 29. Beach erosion control work under special authorization ....................................... 2-17 Flood Control 30. Hackensack Meadowlands, NJ ............................... 2-17 ercises jurisdiction over matters pertaining to improvement of Great Lakes to Hudson River waterway. Under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, the District Engineer, as Supervisor of New York Harbor, also exercises jurisdiction under the laws enacted for the preservation of the tidal waters of New York Harbor, its adjacent or tributary waters, and the waters of Long Island Sound. Flood Control (Cont.) Page 31. Joseph G. Minish Passaic River Waterfront and Historic Area, NJ .................................. 2-17 32. North Ellenville, NY ................. .................... 2-18 33. New York City Watershed, NY ............................. 2-18 34. Passaic River Basin, NJ & NY ........................... 2-19 35. Preservation of Natural Flood Storage, Passaic River, NJ..2-19 36. Ramapo at Oakland, NJ...................................2-20 37. Raritan River Basin, Greenbrook Sub-Basin, NJ ......2-20 38. Inspection of completed flood control projects..........2-21 39. Other authorized flood control projects .................... 2-22 40. Flood control work under special authorization ........2-22 41. 42. 43. General Investigations Surveys ................................................ 2-22 Collection and study of basic data ............................ 2-22 Deauthorized projects ................... ..................... 2-22 Tables Table 2-A Cost & Financial Statement.............................2-24 Table 2-B Authorizing legislation .................................... 2-27 Table 2-C Hudson River, NY Features of Lock and Dam Included in Existing Project ............................ 2-32 Table 2-E Supervisor of New York Harbor Statement of Activities .................................... 2-32 Table 2-F Reconnaissance & Condition Surveys ............ 2-33 Table 2-G Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............ 2-34 Table 2-H Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects .................................. 2-36 Table 2-I Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ...... 2-36 Table 2-J Surveys ..................................... ....... 2-37 Table 2-K Preconstruction Engineering and Design ........2-37 Table 2-L Cost for Flood Plain Management Services ....2-37 Table 2-M Deauthorized Projects ...................................... 2-38 Table 2-N Section 107 Study ....................................... 2-39 Table 2-0 Section 103 Studies ....................................... 2-39 Table 2-P Section 205 Studies ..................................... 2-39 Table 2-Q Section 14 Studies ....................................... 2-40 Table 2-R Section 206 Studies ..................................... 2-40 Table 2-3 Section 1135 Studies ...................................... 2-40 2-1 IMPROVEMENTS Page REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 2-2 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in New York District. Existing Project. Provides for control and progressive eradication of water chestnut. Eurasian water milfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from the navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests were required to provide 30 percent of the cost of the program except as modified by 1962 River and Harbor Act and agree to hold the United States free from damages. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 changed the local responsibility from 30% to 50%. In FY 87 the States involved in the program were permitted to keep the cost sharing at 30% by order of the Secretary of the Army. Starting FY 88, however, local sponsors contributed 50% of the costs. Operations and results during period. FY 1998 has been the seventeenth year of a control program started in FY 1982 for the removal of nuisance aquatic plants in the Lake Champlain Basin, Vermont. Recent work continued the removal of water chestnut and eurasian milfoil from portions of the basin. Condition as of September 30. Reconnaissance report covering the aquatic plant problems of the North Atlantic Division areas was completed in August 1967. The General Design Memorandum for this program was completed in March 1982 by the State of Vermont. The total Federal cost of this control program to date is $2,321,384. In FY 1998, the New York District did not cost-share a FY 1998 program with the State of Vermont, as Federal funds were not yet available. In October 1991, Waterways Experiment Station was directed to conduct a multi-year study which would identify and test potential biocontrol agents of water chestnuts. No successful biocontrol agents of water chestnut were identified. 2. FIRE ISLAND TO JONES INLET, NY Location. On south shore of Long Island, about 50 miles by water south and east of the Battery, New York City. Fire Island Inlet is the main entrance into Great South Bay from the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. A jetty at Fire Island Inlet extending generally southwest and south for 5,000 feet from high ground on Democrat Point at the west end of Fire Island and a channel 14 feet deep and 450 feet wide along the northern edge of the Inlet's shoaling area connecting the ocean to the deep water in the Inlet. Mean tidal ranges at the ocean and inlet ends of Democrat Point are 4.1 feet and 2.4 feet respectively. Irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 2.5 feet below mean low water up to 6.2 feet above mean high water on the ocean side. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Requires cost sharing and lands, easements and rights-of-way. Terminal facilities. Great South Bay has extensive public and private facilities for mooring and servicing recreational boats. Much of this traffic uses the inlet during the boating season, and some traffic (Coast Guard craft and party and head fishing boats) continues throughout the year. Operations and results during period. The fourth scheduled nourishment cycle commenced on 30 December 1996 and was completed on 16 April 1997. A total of 1,081,861 cubic yards of sand was dredged from Fire Island Inlet and placed at Gilgo Beach (718,923 cy) and Robert Moses State Park (362,938 cy, totally State financed). Total contract cost was $6,439,137.48 ($3,500,000 Construction General funds; $1,881,656 Operations and Maintenance funds; and $910,290 provided by the State of New York. In FY 1998 $88,000 in Construction General Funds were utilized to prepare plans and specifications for periodic nourishment cycle #5. Condition as of September 30. The jetty, completed in 1941, surpassed its capacity as a sand entrapping agent in a little over a decade. Since then extensive sand bars and shoals continued to form west of the jetty and in the inlet throat. Hydraulic dredging in the inlet was undertaken in 1959 and again in 1964 under a combined beach erosion control and navigation authorization (1958 Act). Since then 3 more hydraulic dredging operations were conducted starting in 1973 and completed in 1977 under provisions of the 1962 Act (see Table 2B). Maintenance dredging using small hopper dredges has also been done from time to time. Due to local concerns about inlet dredging and consequent erosion at Oak Beach, maintenance had been deferred since 1979 which allowed the complete shoaling of the authorized project channel. To facilitate navigation in this period the existing natural channel was dredged in FY 1985 and in FY 1987. In FY 1987 sand was deposited offshore of Gilgo Beach by hopper dredge using operations and maintenance funds. O&M funds were also used during FY 1987 and 1988 to make repairs to the inner portion of the jetty. In March 1988 the District recommended a plan to maintain a realigned channel in the vicinity of the natural channel to a depth of 14 feet (plus 2 feet of allowable overdepth) and a width of 450 feet. The plan also recommended placement of the dredged material along Gilgo Beach for shore protection purposes. The recommended plan was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works on 2 August 1988. Since FY 1990 the realigned channel was dredged to project depth each year with placement of material along Gilgo Beach for shore protection purpose. 3. HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. Location. Originates in Adirondack Mountains, about 250 2-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 miles in a direct line and 315 miles along its course from the Battery, New York City, and flows generally southerly into New York Bay- Section under improvement extends from New York City about 156 miles to Waterford. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12335, 12341, 12343, 12347, 12348, and 14786.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938, pages 164 and 226, respectively. Existing projects. A channel 600 feet wide from New York City to Kingston, and thence 400 feet wide to Albany. with widening at bends, a turning basin 700 feet wide and 1,200 feet long at Albany, and 2 anchorages, 1 near Hudson and 1 near Stuyvesant, each 400 feet wide and an average length of 2,400 feet; all with depths of 32 feet in soft material and 34 feet in rock to 2.200 feet south of the Mall Bridge; thence 27 feet deep and 400 feet wide to 900 feet south of Mall Bridge, thence 14 feet deep at lower low water and generally 400 feet wide to Federal lock at Troy; and thence of same depth and 200 feet wide to southern limit of State barge canal at Waterford; and removal of State dam at Troy and construction of a lock and dam about 2.5 miles below Waterford. Channel is to be formed by dredging and rock excavation, and maintained by dredging and constructing new, and raising and repairing old, longitudinal dikes, built partly under previous projects and partly by the State of NY. In the tidal section below the Federal dam at Troy, the assumed lowest low water plane downstream to Albany is 3 feet below mean sea level. Mean tidal range is about 5 feet below the dam and about 4.9 feet at Albany. The normal pool level above the dam from Troy to Waterford is 14.3 feet above mean sea level, with the mean range of pool level in seasons of moderate rains being 2.2 feet. (See Table 2-C for features of lock and dam included in existing project.) New work for completed project cost $39,050,019 exclusive of amounts of expended on previous projects. Widening to form harbors at Albany and Troy, N.Y., to 12 feet deep at a cost of $522,000 (1954) and completion of 27-foot channel at Albany at a cost of $642,000 (1957) was placed in deferred for restudy category, and has since been deauthorized. All three features of work are excluded from foregoing description of existing project and cost estimate. Construction of mooring facilities has been authorized. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests must furnish suitable soil disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 6 Operations and results during period. A continuing contract for maintenance dredging of approximately 200,000 cubic yards of sediment from the Hudson River federal project channel was awarded to Natco Limited Partnership of 4 February 1998. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $1,800,500 for the contract and $143,100 for engineering work and supervision and administration of the contract. Total FY98 funds were $1,943,600. Government plant and hired labor were employed through the fiscal year performing project condition surveys at a total cost including supervision and administration of $227,500 for maintenance during FY 1998. Government plant and hired labor were employed through the fiscal year in the removal of snags and other obstructions which constituted a potential hazard to navigation at a total cost including supervision and administration of $242,200. A contract for repairs to the Troy lock miter gates was to Ambatis Contracting Corp on 21 January 1998. Total operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $510,200 was expended during FY 1998 to complete the contract work. Government plant and hired labor were employed through the fiscal year performing operation and maintenance of the Troy Lock and Dam and associated buildings and grounds. Operation of the Troy Lock was suspended for the 1997 navigation season on November 30, 1997 and resumed for the 1998 navigation season on May 1, 1998. Total funds expended for operation and maintenance of the Troy Lock and Dam and associated buildings and grounds including performing instrumentation monitoring, supervision and administration was $853,200 during FY 1998. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began in July 1910 and was substantially completed in November 1965. New lock and dam at Troy, removal of dam at Troy and construction of 15,545 linear feet of dikes also are complete. In reconstruction of old dikes 39,676 linear feet were raised to adopted crest height. Channel from New York City to Albany is complete to a depth of 32 feet except for the 1,500 linear foot section at the northern end of the 32-foot project which has never been dredged to project depth. Channel from Albany to Waterford is complete to a depth of 14 feet. 4. HUDSON RIVER AT ATHENS, NY Location. In Athens, New York along the west bank of the Hudson River approximately 116 miles above the Battery, New York City and approximately 29 miles downstream of Albany, New York. (See Geological Survey, Hudson North, NY quadrangle). Existing project No constructed project in Athens. The main Hudson River navigation channel runs along the east bank of the Hudson River, Hudson New York opposite Middle Ground Flats. The proposed project for Athens consists of the design and construction of a 300-foot wide channel to a depth of 24 feet (mean low water) extending from the existing Federal in the vicinity of the Hudson City Light to the north dock at Union Street in Athens. The project was authorized in Section 110 of the September 1996 Energy and Water 2-4 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT Appropriations Act. Preliminary surveys, geologic, and sediment chemical tests have been carried out. A preliminary channel alignment has been prepared with accompanying dredge quantities. The preliminary cost is $20,400,000 with additional cost needed for improvements at the existing terminal docks. No additional work will be performed until a non-Federal sponsor is identified as noted below. Local cooperation. A non-Federal sponsor is needed before detailed design and environmental studies can be initiated. The non-Federal sponsor would cost share in the design of the project. If the project is found to be viable, then the same non-Federal sponsor or another sponsor would cost share in the construction. Operation and results during period, and condition as of Sept. 30. Preliminary studies have been completed and coordination is ongoing with potential non-Federal sponsors. 5. JAMAICA BAY, NY Location. Inside south shore of Long Island, the entrance being about 17 miles by water south and east of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 12350). Previous projects. For details see page 1770 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 185 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Provides for an interior channel extending from vicinity of Marine Parkway Bridge along west and north shores of the bay, 18 feet deep at mean low water and 300 feet wide to Mill Basin, with a swinging basin, 1,000 feet wide and 1,000 feet long at the point - thence 12 feet deep and 200 feet wide to Fresh Creek Basin; and interior channel extending from the same locality along south shore to Head of Bay, 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide, a channel in Mott Basin, 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide extending from the channel along the south shore, 3,000 feet to junction of the two branches, thence 2,200 feet in north branch (Inwood Creek) and 3,200 feet in south branch; and an entrance channel connecting the two interior channels with deep water in Atlantic Ocean, of suitable hydraulic dimensions to maintain present tidal prism in the bay, but not less than 18 feet deep and 500 feet wide from opposite Barren Island to Rockaway Point, thence enlarging to not less than 20 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide to the sea, protected by one riprap jetty. Length of section included in project is 19.7 miles. Mean tidal range, 4.9 feet at Barren Island, and 5.1 feet at Head of Bay; mean range of spring tides, 5.9 and 6.1 feet, respectively: irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 4 feet below mean low water to 4.9 feet above mean high water. Cost for new work for completed project is $4,466,421 (July 1961), excluding amounts expended on previous projects. Legal cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1945 provides that in lieu of conditions heretofore prescribed local interest furnish suitable areas for disposal of dredged materials for new work and subsequent maintenance, and hold the United States free from damages. City of New York was notified of conditions of local cooperation in letter dated January 25, 1946. In letter dated February 7, 1946, the Mayor of New York advised that disposal areas are available and necessary document "holding the United States free from claim for damages" would be executed. River and Harbor Act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands, easements, rights-of-way, and suitable areas for disposal of dredged material during construction and subsequent maintenance, hold the United States free from damages and perform all necessary alterations to existing terminals and bulkheads, and dredge adequate approaches thereto. These conditions have been fulfilled. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5. Operations and results during period. A continuing contract for the removal and disposal of material lying above the plane of 20 feet below mean low water in Jamaica Bay, NY was awarded on 15 August 1998 to Weeks Marine Inc. Dredging is expected to be completed during the first quarter of FY99. Total operations & maintenance funds expended on this project during FY '98 was $356,204.95 Conditions as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced in August 1912 and completed in June 1961. Westerly interior channel from Barren Island to Fresh Creek Basin and swinging basin at Mill Basin were completed in April 1929. Southerly interior channel and channel in Mott Basin, including its two branches were completed in June 1961. No new work dredging of entrance channel, was done, since depths provided under previous project were greater than those required under existing project. East jetty was restored to project dimensions in August 1963. 6. JONES INLET, NY Location. A small inlet on south shore of Long Island connecting Hempstead Bay with Atlantic Ocean, 37 miles by water southeast of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352). Existing Project. An entrance jetty and channel 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide, from that depth in the ocean through the inlet to Loop Causeway Bridge over Long Creek. Section included in project is about 2.1 miles long, mean tidal range from 4.2 feet at ocean entrance to 3.1 feet at Loop Causeway Bridge; mean range of spring tide varies from 5 to 3.7 feet, respectively; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 8.5 feet above mean high water.(See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation). Legal cooperation. Complied with except that local interests must furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for future maintenance as required, and must maintain a channel 12 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide from Loop Causeway Bridge over Long Creek to head of navigation in Freeport Creek at Mill Road. Terminal facilities. Within area tributary to Jones Inlet there 2-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 are a number of privately owned small wharves and numerous boat repair and storage yards. The latter are equipped for repair of pleasure craft and fishing vessels. In addition, there are public wharves open to the public free of charge, with a total dockage of 2,180 feet. Additional terminals would have to be constructed for receipt of commercial freight in any sizable quantity. Operations and results during period. A contract for rehabilitation of the jetty was awarded as a continuing contract FY '96/97/98 to Ribar Contracting, Inc. Rehabilitation of the jetty was completed as scheduled on 12 September 1998. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $395,100.80 was expended during FY 1998 bringing the overall total thus far to $2,666,519.90. Conditions as of September 30. Construction of the existing project was commenced August 1953 and completed June 1959. Studies made in attempt to minimize required maintenance: JONES INLET - JETTY REHABILITATION. The purpose of this study is to develop a feasible and cost effective design for rehabilitation of the Jones Inlet Jetty to insure structural stability and maximize the sand trapping efficiency of the structure. Inlet hydrographic and existing jetty condition surveys have been performed. Preliminary design and cost estimates for alternative schemes have been developed and the superior scheme recommended. JONES INLET - MAINTENANCE MODIFICATIONS. The purpose of this study is to develop feasible and cost efficient alternatives which would minimize channel maintenance requirements. Existing tidal/inlet hydraulics, inlet/bay stability, jetty impoundment rates, etc. have been evaluated. Several methods of shoaling analysis were reviewed and the most applicable used. Preliminary design layouts and cost estimates for a deposition basin and navigation channel have been developed and the superior scheme recommended. 7. KILL VAN KULL - NEWARK BAY CHANNEL, NJ & NY Location. The project includes Kill Van Kull connecting upper New York Bay with Newark Bay, and channels in lower Newark Bay serving Port Newark and Elizabeth Marine Terminal. These terminals are located on the west shore of Newark Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12333.) Existing project. Deepening the existing Kill Van Kull channel and channels in lower Newark Bay, including turning and maneuvering areas, as well as deepening the Elizabeth and Port Newark channels. The deepening to be done from the existing 35 foot depth incrementally to 40 feet and then 44 feet. The Federal cost of construction is estimated at $823,300,000 with an additional $863,000,000 to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, the local cooperating agency, has entered into a local cooperation agreement with the Government which was executed on 30 May 1986. A supplemental agreement was executed on 21 May 1987, for Phase I. A new project cooperating agreement will be entered into in 1998 for Phase II (40 feet to 45 feet). Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period, and condition as of Sept. 30. Stage 1, channel deepening to 40 feet in seven contracts was substantially completed. Contract No.1, awarded in June 1987, is completed. Contract No. 2 was awarded in July 1988 and is completed. Contract No. 3 was awarded in Sept. 1988 and is completed. Removal of rock and hard material in the Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay was divided in three contracts, 4A, 4B and 4C. Contract 4A was awarded in April 1991 and was completed in Sept. 1995. Contract No. 5 was awarded in May 1988 and is complete. Contract 4C was awarded in Sept. 1994 and was completed in July 1995. Stage 2, channel deepening to 45 feet has commenced with start of work on a Limited Re-evaluation Report, which was approved Oct., 1997. 8. MORICHES INLET, NY Location. On the south shore of Long Island, about 80 miles by water east of the Battery, New York City. It is an opening through the narrow sandy barrier beach on the south shore of Long Island which separates the Atlantic Ocean from a series of interconnected bays. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352). Existing Project. Provides for a channel, 10 feet deep at mean low water and 200 feet wide extending from that depth in the Atlantic Ocean to Moriches Bay, a distance of 0.7 miles; thence a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to the Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, a distance of 1.1 miles; rehabilitation of the existing jetties and revetments. Recent provisions include an outer channel deposition basin, a west jetty scour blanket, and habitat enhancement for shore birds. Estimate of cost of work is $13,050,000 (October 1988 P.L.) including $50,000 from Coast Guard and $4,550,000 to contributed by local interests. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. In accordance with the project authorization, local interests are required to furnish all easements, rights-of-way including relocations that are necessary for improvements at an overall 35% cost sharing basis. The annual Operations and Maintenance cost is estimated to be $1,860,000 of which the local share is 50% or $930,000 per year. An Agreement of Local Cooperation was executed on 30 June 1986. The New York State department of Environmental Conservation is the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. Several yacht clubs, boatyards, and public wharfs and landings, and numerous private landings are located in Moriches Bay. There are boat basins open to the public. The facilities existing in the bay are considered adequate for present and probable future needs under present conditions of Moriches Inlet. There is room for expansion should future activity warrant. Operations and results during period. A contract for main- 2-6 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT tenance dredging of Moriches Inlet was awarded as option #1 to the Shinnecock Inlet dredging Contract (Weeks Marine, Inc.) for the removal and disposal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 14 feet with 2 feet allowable overdepth below mean low water, in specified areas of the Entrance Channel and Deposition Basin at Moriches Inlet as shown on the contract drawings with placement of the dredged material as beach fill on the adjacent west beach. A total of 186,187 cubic yards of sand was placed. Operation and maintenance funds expended on this project during FY 1998 was $960,954.23 in addition to $290,958.00 in matching State funds bringing total cost to $1,251,912.23. Condition as of September 30. Pre-construction planning resumed in October 1977. Coordination continued with Federal, State and local agencies on current problems and need for all project purposes (i.e., navigation; beach erosion control; water quality improvement). A post authorization change was approved in September 1983 to allow construction of each project purpose separately which clarified authority to defer all purposes except navigation. In January 1980, a breach occurred adjacent to the eastern jetty. Emergency funds ($11.3 million) were authorized under the authority of PL84-99 to close the breach. About 1,185,000 yards of sand fill were used to effect closure of the breach by March 1981. 9. NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, NY &VT Location. This waterway. 37 miles long, comprises southern end of Lake Champlain and extends from Whitehall to Crown Point, N.Y. at southern extremity of lake, northerly to Benson Landing, VT. (See N.O.S. Chart 14784). Previous projects. For details, see Annual Reports for 1931, and 1963, pages 256 and 177, respectively. Existing project. A channel extending from Whitehall, N.Y. at head of Lake Champlain to Benson Landing, 12 feet deep at low lake level and generally 150 feet wide, and installation of fender booms at Putts Rock, Putts Leap, Narrows near Dresden, Pulpit Point and, Cedar Mountain. Reference plane of low take level is 93 feet above mean sea level. Section included in project is about 13.5 miles. Usual annual variation of lake level is 5.8 feet and extreme variation varies from 0.6 foot below up to 8.8 feet above low lake level. Widening channel throughout its entire length to project width of 200 feet is inactive and excluded from foregoing description of existing project and cost estimate. (See Table 2- B for Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during period. Government plant and hired labor were employed intermittently during the fiscal year 1998 in the removal of snags and obstructions that constituted a potential hazard to navigation at a cost of $23,600. Government plant and hired labor were employed in the repair replacement of deteriorated fender booms at a cost of $11,700 during the fiscal year. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $7,200 were expended in FY 1998 on project condition surveys and $50,600 were expended on preliminary engineering and design work associated with proposed maintenance dredging of the project channel. Condition as of September 30. Work under the existing project was commenced June 1919 and is about 77 percent complete. A channel 12 feet deep at low lake level and least width of 150 feet has been excavated throughout the length of the improvement, except at the Elbow, where the width is 110 feet. Fender booms have. been placed at the elbow. (Putts Leap and Putts Rock.) 10. NEWARK BAY, HACKENSACK AND PASSAIC RIVERS, NJ Location. Newark Bay is an estuary about 1.25 miles wide and 6 miles long extending southerly from confluence of Hackensack and Passaic Rivers to New York and New Jersey Channels. Hackensack River rises near Haverstraw, Rockland County, NY and flows about 45 miles into Newark Bay. Passaic River rises in highlands of northeastern New Jersey and flows about 80miles into Newark Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12333 and 12337). Previous projects. For details, see 1926 Annual Report, pages 265 and 266; and Annual Reports for 1929, 1938, 1954, and 1976, pages 301, 244, 124, and 2-11 respectively. Existing project. A main channel 700 feet wide to the branch channel to Port Newark, thence 500 feet wide to a turning basin 1,300 feet long and 900 feet wide at the junction of the Hackensack and Passaic River channels, length about 4.7 miles; a maneuvering area south of the removed Central Railroad of New Jersey Bridge 2,200 feet long and 300 feet wide with depths of 38 feet in the south half and 35 feet in the north half; a combined bend cutoff and maneuvering area at the south side of the junction with Elizabeth branch channel; and widening bends at the Kill Van Kull and Port Newark Channels. (Authorized depth 35 feet except as noted above). (adopted 1966); including a triangular area east of Shooters Island with a depth of 37 feet. At Port Newark - A branch channel 500 feet wide, leading to an inshore channel 400 feet wide 1.6 miles (adopted 1945). Authorized depth 37 feet in rock and 35 feet in soft material; a pierhead channel 200 feet wide along the east bulkhead between the Port Newark and Elizabeth branch channels, between 4,100 feet. Authorized depth 35 feet (adopted 1962). At Elizabeth Marine Terminal - A branch channel 500 feet wide, length about 1.4 miles; a pierhead channel along the east bulkhead 290 feet wide, length about 2,600 feet, a southern approach area just above former Central Railroad of New Jersey Bridge enlarged for turning and maneuvering, with a maximum length of about 2,700 feet and width (between the pierhead channel and Newark Bay channel) of about 800 feet. Authorized depth 35 feet (adopted 1962). 2-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Location cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1954 provides local interests, furnish lands, right-of-way, the suitable spoil-disposal areas for initial construction and future maintenance; provide depths commensurate with channel depth in approaches and berths at terminals of companies which would use improvement; and hold the United States free from damages. River and Harbor Act of 1962 provides that local interests must provide lands, easements and right-of-way for maintenance and construction, hold United States free from damages, provide and maintain adequate public terminal and transfer facilities, and accomplish without cost to the United States, removal or relocation of pipelines, cable and other utilities. Assurances were furnished by Port of New York Authority and accepted June 12, 1964. Local cooperation required by previous modifications is fully complied with. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. A continuing contract for the removal and disposal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 40 feet, with 2 feet allowable overdepth below mean low water, in specified areas of the Branch Channels of the Newark Bay Channel at Port Elizabeth, NJ. The contract was awarded to ECDC Environmental, LC on 25 August 1997, and completed on 30 April 1998 removing 205,034 cubic yards of material. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $5,763,435.50 was expended on this project during FY 1998, in addition to $4,254,455.00 in funds provided by the Port Authority. Total contract cost was $10,017,890.50 for dredging Newark Bay Channel. A contract for maintenance dredging of Elizabeth Channel was awarded on 18 April 1998 to Norfolk Dredging Co. for the removal of 415,895 cubic yards of material and was completed on 16 June 1998 at a cost of $5,678,375.80. Total operation and maintenance funds expended on Newark Bay, Hackensack and Passaic Rivers during FY 1998 was $11,925,238.42. Condition as of September 30. Work under the active portion of the original project began June 1976 and is 100 percent complete. Work remaining to complete existing original project consists of deepening the Hackensack River channel to depths of 32 feet and 15 feet. 11. NEW YORK HARBOR AND ADJACENT CHANNELS, (PORT JERSEY CHANNEL), NJ Location. The Port Jersey Channel is the navigation channel from its confluence with Anchorage Channel to its head of navigation in Bayonne, where Global Terminal provides berthing facilities for container commerce, located within Port of New York and New Jersey. Existing Project. Deepening the existing (non-Federal) Port Jersey Channel and a turning basin at the head of navigation. The authorized project provides for deepening the existing 35- foot deep channel to a depth of 41-feet deep below mean low and generally 450 feet wide with suitable bends and turning areas to extend from deep water in the Anchorage Channel, New York Harbor, westward approximately 12,000 feet along the southern boundary of the Port Jersey peninsula, to the head of navigation in Jersey City, New Jersey. The Federal cost of construction is estimated at $83,208 with an additional $28,514 to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. The State of New Jersey, the local cooperating agency, will enter into a Project Cooperating Agreement (PCA) with the Government once the project cost has been reauthorized. Operations and results during period, and conditions as of September 30. A Limited Reevaluation Report (LRR), which recommended the deepening of the channel to 41 ft., which was submitted to Corps of Engineering Headquarters in early March 1998. 12. NEW YORK HARBOR-COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Applies to Lower and Upper Bays, New York Harbor; East River, Harlem River, Hudson River Channel, N.Y., New York and New Jersey Channels, Newark Bay, N.J. and their tributaries. Existing project. Provides for collection, removal and disposal of drift, derelict vessels, deteriorated shore structures and debris along shores of New York Harbor and tributary waters, and for the repair of certain other piers, wharves and shore structures. Work authorized before Act of 1974 was restricted solely to removal of drift from waterway and was funded as maintenance activity. The current estimate of first cost is $292,000,000 (October 1997 P.L.) including $68,000,000 cash contribution from local interests plus $89,000,000 to be contributed for repair and disposal of deteriorated shore structures in use. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local cooperation conditions of the plans currently under review by the Chief of Engineers provide that local interests must furnish all lands, easements and rightsof- way required for the improvement; hold the United States free from damages; enact and enforce local legislation to prevent creation of sources of drift, contribute in cash one third of the first cost of the Federal work, and make necessary repairs to deteriorated structures in use so as to eliminate them as a source of drift. These conditions are subject to approval by the Secretary of the Army and the President, as stipulated in Section 113 of the authorizing law, Public Law 91-611. Operations and results (New work-cumulative to date). A total of five Liberty State Park contracts have been completed at a cost of $10,321,211. East River-Manhattan Waterfront contract was completed at a cost of $1,477,806. A contract for the removal of pier 17 and 18 on the East River was completed at a cost of $219,604. The City of Elizabeth contract was completed at a cost of $791,656. The Stapleton, Staten Island 2-8 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT contract was completed at a cost of $2,910,400. A contract for the city of Hoboken was completed at a cost of $2,123,404. Work along the Jersey City South waterfront was completed at the cost of $979,580. Contract Number One at Weehawken to Edgewater was completed at a cost of $1,697,487. The Brooklyn Reach One contract was completed at a cost of $5,057,920. Work was completed on the Weehawken to Edgewater contract No. 2 at a cost of $8,490,000, and Jersey City North Contract No. 2, at a cost of $1,800,000. The Bayonne One contract has been completed at a cost of $735,800. Hoboken Pier B was completed at a cost of $973,590, and Jersey City North 1 was completed at a cost of $2,358,000. Weehawken-Edgewater Contract 2A was completed at a cost of $4,550,000. Engineering and design is in progress for Brooklyn Reach 2B, the Shooters Island Reach, the Arthur Kill, NY & NJ Reaches, the Bayonne 2 Reach, and the Kill Van Kull Reach. The Brooklyn 2A Reach removal contract was initiated in Jan. 1999. The construction cost for removal is $4,878,022, which includes $500,000 for an option to the contract. Maintenance. U.S. Debris Boats Driftmaster, Gelberman and Hayward and auxiliary plant were assigned the task of removing and disposing of floating debris that is a hazard to navigation. Removal and disposal of 533,740 cubic feet (4,170 cords) of floating debris consisting mainly of driftwood, ranging in size from small blocks to large timbers, including pilings, pieces of wreckage, derelict vessels and sections of deteriorated pier structure was accomplished at a cost of $4,859,836.70. Conditions as of September 30. For work authorized by Water Resources Development Act, removal of drift sources has been completed in New Jersey at Liberty State Park, the City of Elizabeth, Hoboken, and parts of Jersey City, Bayonne, Weehawken and Edgewater. The New York City work has been completed along the Manhattan side of the East River, along part of the Brooklyn waterfront, and at Stapleton, Staten Island. 13. NEW YORK HARBOR-ENTRANCE CHANNELS AND ANCHORAGE AREAS Location. In Upper and Lower Bays, New York Harbor is 330 miles southwest by water of Boston Harbor. Mass., and 165 miles northeast of entrance to Delaware Bay, N.J. The Upper Bay extends about 5.5 miles southerly from junction of Hudson and East Rivers opposite the Battery, New York City to the Narrows. Lower Bay extends about 9 miles from the Narrows to the sea. (See National Ocean Survey charts 12334, 12335, and 12349.) Existing project. Ambrose Channel 45 feet deep and 2,000 feet wide. extending about 10.2 miles from sea to deep water in the Lower bay; Anchorage Channel, an extension of Ambrose Channel, with same depth and width, in the Upper bay opposite anchorage grounds, about 5.7 miles long; and southerly entrance channel. Sandy Hook Channel (East Section) 35 feet deep and generally 800 feet wide extending 3.4 miles from 35-foot ocean contour to Bayside Channel along an alignment generally west of the South Channel; and elimination from authorized project of that portion of Bayside-Gedney Channel east of junction with new southerly entrance channel; for Bayside Channel 35 feet deep and 800 feet wide, extending about 5.3 miles from Bayside Channel to deep water in Lower bay; a channel along New Jersey pierhead line connecting Kill Van Kull with deep water in anchorage Channel, south of Liberty Island anchorage. 20 feet deep for 500 feet wide with widening at bends to 800 feet and about 3 miles long; an anchorage in vicinity of Liberty (Bedloes) Island (about 160 acres in extent) 20 feet deep; and for removal of Craven Shoal to 30 feet deep; for a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 2.3 miles long, extending from bell buoy 23 to Hoffman and Swinburne Island; for an anchorage area in Red Hooks Flats to depths of 45,40 and 35 feet and an anchorage area in Gravesand Bay to 47 feet deep. Project depths refer to mean low water. Mean tidal range is 4.7 feet at Fort Hamilton; mean range of spring tides, 5.7 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 6.2 feet above mean high water. Location cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. A contract for the removal and disposal of all material except ledge rock lying above 47.0 feet mean low water, from Gravesend Bay with placement on the beach at Coney Island was awarded in 1998. Approximately 82.038 cubic yards of material was removed between May and June of 1998. Operation and maintenance funds in the amount of $891,744.80 was expended for maintenance dredging of Gravesend Bay Anchorage in 1998. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing projects began in 1885 and is 100 percent complete. Main Ship and Bayside-Gedney Channels were completed to 30 feet deep in February 1891. Deepening of Bayside-Gedney Channel to 35 feet for a width of 800 feet was completed in June 1939. Ambrose Channel was completed to 40 feet deep for a width of 2.000 feet in April 1914 and substantially completed to 45 feet for a width of 2,000 feet in 1951. Relocation of Anchorage Channel was completed to 40 feet deep in October 1932. Center 800 feet was dredged to 45 feet in June 1947 and westerly 600-foot strip in April 1948. Easterly 600-foot strip was substantially completed in June 1953. Channel between Staten Island and Hoffman and Swinburne Islands was completed in December 1920 up to within 300 feet of southerly limits of the project. Dredged channel meets all needs of navigation and no further work of improvement is contemplated for the present. Channel along New Jersey pierhead line from Kill Van Kull to Anchorage Channel was completed in March 1939. Widening at bends nearly southerly and northerly ends authorized in 1948 was completed to depths of 45, and 35 feet in October 1976. Anchorage Channel was relocated to the westward in 1982. Red Hook Flats Anchorage was accordingly increased in area. 2-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 No dredging was required. Liberty (Bedloes) Island anchorage was completed to 20 feet in October 1944. Sandy Hook Channel (east section was completed to a depth of 35 feet in June 1963. Gravesend Bay was completed to a 47- foot depth in November 1977. 14. NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS Location. Extends from deep water northwest of Sandy Hook, through Lower New York Bay and Raritan Bay, to Perth Amboy, and thence through Arthur Kill, Lower Newark Bay, and Kill Van Kull to deep water in Upper New York Bay. This route is approximately along boundary line between States of New York and New Jersey. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12333, 12331, and 12327.) Previous projects. For details see 1963 Annual Report pages 184 and 185. Existing project. A channel through Lower New York Bay, Raritan Bay, Arthur Kill, Lower Newark Bay, and Kill Van Kull to Upper New York Bay and Raritan Bay and in Arthur Kill to a point 1,000 feet north of Smith Creek, widened to 800 feet in vicinity of Seguine Point and Wards Point, respectively, thence 500 wide to a point 1,000 feet south of Piles Creek; thence 500 to 600 feet wide and passing, north of Shooters Island and protected by a dike o nits northern side to junction of channel into Newark Bay; thence 800 feet wide through Kill Van Kull to Constable Hook; thence 1,000 feet wide for a point near the intersection with the channel along New Jersey pierhead line: and thence 1,400 feet wide through Kill Van Kull to Upper New York Bay; with an anchorage 38 feet deep to accommodate five vessels south of Perth Amboy, all with suitable easing at bends and junctions. Section included in project is 30.8 miles long. In addition, construction of a dike north of Shooters Island and two secondary channels 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide, one south of Shooters Island and the other in Raritan Bay connecting with Raritan River, were completed under previous projects and maintained under existing project. A triangular area at the eastern end of the 30 foot channel south of Shooters Island was deepened to 35 feet in order to provide additional widening in the vicinity of Bergen Point and is included in the Newark Bay project. All depths refer to plane of mean low water. Mean range of tides varies between 4.7 and 5.1 feet; mean range of spring tides 5.7 to 6.3 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 6.9 feet above mean high water. Anchorage at Sandy Hook and cutoff at junction of Main Ship Channel are deferred for restudy and excluded from foregoing description and cost estimate. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for the middle section of Arthur Kill where local interest must furnish spoil disposal areas for maintenance. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1988, Vol. 2. Operation and results during period. A contract for the removal and disposal of all material except rock lying above the plane of 35.0 feet, with 1 foot allowable overdepth below mean low water in identified areas between the Gothals Bridge and the Outerbridge Crossing of the Arthur Kill Channel as shown on the contract drawings with Disposal of the dredged material at an approved/permitted Contractor-furnished non ocean disposal site was awarded on 6 November 1997 to ECDC Environmental, LC. Approximately 913,068 cubic yards of material was removed at a cost from New York & New Jersey Channel. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $44,469,574.00 was expended on this project during FY 1998. Condition as of September 30. Work under active portion of existing project began in October 1933. Work completed consists of providing authorized project depth and widths throughout entire channel form Lower New York Bay to Upper New York Bay and providing depths of 37 and 25 feet in Perth Amboy Anchorage. In addition to above mentioned work, construction of dike north of Shooters Island, two secondary channels 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide, one south of Shooters Island, the other in Raritan Bay connecting with Raritan River were completed under previous projects. Work remaining under existing project consists of dredging cutoff junction of Main Ship Channel to dimensions authorized by River and Harbor Acts of August 30, 1935, and May 17, 1950, dredging anchorage in vicinity of Sandy Hook. 15. RONDOUT HARBOR, NY Location. Comprises tidal mouth about 3.5 miles long, of Rondout Creek, whose source is about 18 miles west of Rondout. Creek empties into Hudson River from the west, about 89 miles north of the Battery, New York City, and 55 miles south of Albany. Existing project. A channel 100 feet wide, widening at bends, and 14 feet deep from deep water in Hudson River to highway bridge, 1.3 miles above mouth, thence 12 feet deep to 3.5 miles above mouth, two parallel dikes 350 feet apart to maintain channel, and a branch dike to extend upstream from outer end of north dike to protect that dike from running ice in the Hudson River. Mean tidal range, 3.7 feet; mean range of spring tides, 4.2 feet; extreme range, 8.2 feet; irregular fluctuations due to freshets vary from 2 feet below mean low water up to 2.5 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost $131,140. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation). Location cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1965 provides local interests, furnish lands, easements, and rights-ofway for construction and future maintenance of the Federal project as modified and for construction and maintenance of aids to navigation upon request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable spoil-disposal areas and necessary retaining works; hold the United States free from damages, and provide 2-10 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT and maintain depths in berthing areas serving terminals commensurate with depths provided in related project areas. Assurance of local compliance were furnished by the town of Ulster on June 9, by the city of Kingston on June 17, and by the town of Esopus on June 20, 1996. Terminal facilities. Seventeen timber wharves with available dockage of 12, 132 feet along waterway. Four terminals are equipped with transfer facilities; all are privately owned. Terminals adequate for present needs of commerce. (For latest full description see Port and Terminal Facilities at the Ports on Upper Hudson River, 1941, Corps of Engineers). Operations and results during period. A continuing contract was awarded on 8 August 1997 to Ribar Contracting, to install approximately 76,000 vertical linear feet of round treated timber piles 6,400 linear feet of treated wales, 16 tons of tie rods, and 10,500 tons of stone to repair the existing dike system to repair the breakwater at Rondout Harbor, Kingston, NY. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $1,945,200 was expended on this project during FY 1998. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced April 1873 and is about 87 percent complete. Part of diking originally proposed was not built because it was deemed of doubtful usefulness. Two parallel dikes of an aggregate length of about 5,000 feet, generally 350 feet apart, with a now obsolete spur from the old lighthouse south of south dike, were built across the bar at mouth of creek. A branch dike about 1,000 feet long, extending northerly from outer end of north dike, was also constructed. Work remaining consists of removal of shoals in the 12 and 14 foot projects and rehabilitation of deteriorated sections of the parallel and branch dikes. 16. SHINNECOCK INLET, NY Location. On the south shore of Long Island, about 95 miles east of the Battery, New York City. It is an opening through the sandy barrier beach, connecting Shinnecock Bay with the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 10 feet deep (mlw) and 200 feet wide with a deposition basin, thence extending through the inlet to Shinnecock Bay for a distance of about 0.7 mile thence a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to the Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, a distance of about 1 mile; rehabilitation of the existing jetties and revetments. Estimate of cost for work is $22,300.000 (October 91 P.L.) of which the Federal share is $16,900,000 and non-Federal share is $5,400,000. Local cooperation. The navigation improvement will accrue both recreational and commercial benefits which result in a first cost allocation of 69 percent Federal and 31 percent non- Federal. The authorizing document also requires that local authorities: provide without cost to the United States, all lands easements, rights-of-way, and suitable disposal areas for the initial work and for subsequent maintenance, when and as required; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and maintenance of the project; maintain and operate the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; provide and maintain suitable terminal facilities when and as required for the accommodation of vessels that would navigate the inlet and adjacent bays, open to all on equal terms; maintain, for the duration of the economic life of the project, continued public ownership of the publicly owned shores and their administration for public use, and continued availability for public use of the privately owned shores upon which a portion of the Federal share of the costs is based. A Local Cooperation Agreement for the dredging element of the project was executed with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation on 7 June 90. A Local Cooperation Agreement for the jetty reconstruction phase of work is pending. Terminal facilities. Shinnecock Bay, and adjacent ocean area, constitute an important marine fishery. The public fishing facility includes three docks, one of which, the Shinnecock Fishermens Cooperative, stores and market the catch for the fishermen. Operations and results during the period. A contract for the removal and disposal of all rock lying above the plane of 20 feet, with 2 feet allowable overdepth below mean low water, in specified areas of the Entrance Channel and Deposition Basin at Shinnecock Inlet, NY as shown on the contract drawings with placement of the dredged material as beach fill on the adjacent west beach was awarded on 20 Aug. 1998. Dredging commenced on 11 September 1998 and was completed on 27 September 1998. A total of 405,139 cubic yards of sand was dredged and placed on the beach west of the jetty. Operation and maintenance funds in the amount of $2,234,809.67 in addition to $485,851.48 in matching State funds was expended on this project during FY 1998 for a total project cost of $2,720,661.15. Condition as of September 30. The initial dredging and reconstruction of the east and west jetties have been completed. 17. SHOAL HARBOR AND COMPTON CREEK, NJ Location. Shoal Harbor is on the south shore of Sandy Hook Bay about 4 miles west of Sandy Hook. Compton Creek is a small stream rising on the west side of the Navesink Highlands and flowing north through meadows into Shoal Harbor. (See Coast chart 12327). Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1934, and 1938, pages 211 and 265, respectively. Existing project. A 1.8 mile channel to 12 feet deep at mean low water extending from deep water in Sandy Hook Bay to first bend in creek, thence 8 feet deep to the Main Street Bridge across Compton Creek with a width of 150 feet in the bay and 75 feet inside the mouth of the creek, with widening at 2-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 bends. Mean tidal range, 4.7 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.6 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.8 feet below mean low water up to 5.9 feet above mean high water. New work for the completed portion of the project cost $107,572 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects and exclusive of $77,247 expended from contributed funds. Dredging of channel in the creek to a depth of 8 feet to a point 1,000 feet upstream from Main Street Bridge is inactive and is excluded from foregoing description and cost estimate. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. The River and Harbor Act of September 3, 1954, provides local interests contribute in cash 50 percent of first cost of work, and agree to: (a) furnish, without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-ofway, and suitable spoil-disposal areas for initial work and for subsequent maintenance when and as required; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and maintenance of the project; and (c) deepen to 14 feet the berths at the terminals along the improved section of channel; and provided further that no work shall be undertaken until local interests have complied with the outstanding condition of local cooperation required under existing project which pertains to construction of a public wharf. Assurances of compliance by local interests with requirements under Act of September 3,1 954, dated July 30, 1956, were accepted September 25, 1956 by the District Engineer for the United States of America. Operations and results during period. A contract was awarded on 31 July 1998 to Wickberg Marine Contracting Inc. for the removal and disposal of all material in Section 1 lying above the plane of 12 feet below mean low water, plus 2 foot allowable overdepth; and in section 2 all material lying above the plane of 8 feet below mean low water in Shoal Harbor & Compton Creek with disposal of the material at the upland site as shown on contract drawings. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $849, 873.99 was expended in FY98. Condition as of September 30. Work under the entire existing project is about 78 percent complete. Work under active portion of the existing project was commenced in August 1936 and completed in November 1956. Work remaining to be done under the project consists of extending the 8-foot channel 1,000 feet upstream from the Main Street Bridge. 18. SUPERVISOR OF NEW YORK HARBOR (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTION AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS) The District Engineer, New York District, was designated Supervisor of New York Harbor under the provisions of the River and Harbor Act of June 29, 1888 (33 U.S.C. 441-451), as amended July 12, 1952. Under this Act, the Supervisor of New York Harbor is charged with the mission of preventing the deposit of obstructive and injurious materials in New York Harbor and its adjacent and tributary waters, including Long Island Sound. The River and Harbor Act of August 18, 1894 (33 U.S.C. 452) makes it unlawful for any person or persons to engage in fishing or dredging for shellfish in any of the channels leading to and from New York Harbor, or to interfere in any way with the safe navigation of deep draft traffic; the River and Harbor Act of March 3. 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403, 407, 409) prohibits obstructions to navigable waters such as unauthorized structures, unauthorized fill, deposit of refuse, and willful or negligent abandonment of vessels. Other laws relating to the supervision of New York Harbor and its tributary waters are the Clean Water Act, the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1969, the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, the Federal Power Act of 1920, the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Deepwater Port Act of 1972, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, and the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act. Direct supervision of the waters under the jurisdiction of the New York District is accomplished by means of a patrol vessel whose scope of duty includes surveillance of the water front for unauthorized construction or fill, surveillance of tows enroute to dumping grounds in the Atlantic Ocean to ensure that material is not illegally deposited in the waters of New York Harbor, and investigation of wrecks and abandoned vessels. In addition to the patrol vessels, whose range of patrol is limited to New York Harbor, inspectors utilizing government vehicles equipped with two-way radios patrol shorefront facilities and property. The inspectors operate out of the New York District Office. Their duties include inspection of authorized construction, fill or excavation in waterways, including wetland areas, to ensure that work is performed in accordance with the Corps permit, as well as investigating unauthorized construction activities. The inspectors also patrol all waterways in their respective areas and inform the public of the Corps' role and jurisdiction as well as provide assistance in the preparation of permit application. (See Table 2-E at end of chapter.) 19. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 2-F at end of chapter.) 20. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 2-G at end of chapter.) 21. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 645, 86th Congress as amended (Pre-authorization). (See Table 2-N at end of chapter.) 2-12 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT 22. ATLANTIC COAST OF LONG ISLAND JONES INLET TO EAST ROCKAWAY INLET LONG BEACH ISLAND, NY Location. Atlantic Coast of Long Island, in Nassau County, New York, between Jones Inlet and East Rockaway Inlet. Existing Project. The project feasibility study was conducted pursuant to a resolution by the Committee on Public Works and Transportation of the U.S. House of Representatives that was adopted October 1, 1986. Project construction was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. The authorized plan provides for storm damage protection for 7 miles of public shoreline against a 100-year storm event. Protection is provided by constructing a 110-foot wide protective beach berm at an elevation of 10 feet above sea level backed by a 25- foot wide dune system at an elevation 15 feet above sea level. The project also includes the rehabilitation of 16 existing groins and the construction of six new groins at the eastern end of the island. In addition, the project includes periodic nourishment of the restored beaches on a 5-year cycle for a period of 50 years following initial construction. Local Cooperation. The local sponsor is the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, who funded 50 percent of the cost of the feasibility study. The Project Cooperation Agreement has not yet been negotiated, but the customary provisions are that local interests will provide, without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rightsof- way, including borrow areas, necessary for construction of the project, fund 35% of the total project cost, assure continued conditions of public ownership and use of the shore, maintain public use facilities open and available to all on equal terms, and maintain all improvements after completion of construction in accordance with Federal regulations for the economic life of the project. Operations and results during the period and condition as of September 30. The Feasibility Report with Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was completed in February 1995. The Pre-construction, Engineering and Design (PED) phase was completed in September 1997. The final EIS was released for public comment in May 1998 and the record of decision was signed in December 1998. Since current administration policy does not support continued funding for shore protection projects such as Long Beach, construction funds were not budgeted in FY 1998 or FY 1999. Congress added $2 million in FY 1998 and $7.5 million in FY 1999 to continue the design of the project and initiate construction. However, the local sponsors have requested that the Corps of Engineers reanalyze the area between the proposed new groins and existing groin field in the City of Long Beach before starting construction. A study is underway which utilizes new modeling techniques that were unavailable during the feasibility study to finalize the groin field design. The study is scheduled to be complete in July 1999. BEACH EROSION CONTROL 23. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET TO ROCKAWAY INLET & JAMAICA BAY, NY Location. Atlantic Coast of New York City, between East Rockaway and Rockaway Inlets, and the lands within and surrounding Jamaica Bay. The coastal area (about 10 miles long) is a peninsula in Queens County separating the ocean and the bay. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12327, 12350, and 12326). Existing project. The projects consists of nourishing 100 foot wide beach at an elevation of 10 feet above mean low water from Beach 149th Street to 19th Street. Initial beach replenishment was completed in FY 1997. Periodic nourishment (5 contracts) previously took place between 1979 and 1988. Construction of a stone groin at Beach 149th St. was completed in September 1982. A Section 934 Report approved in February 1994, recommended continued nourishment over a nine year period. Federal participation includes first cost and periodic beach nourishment, the total estimated at $63,000,000 (Oct. 1996 P.L.) The Section 934 Report also recommended a reformulation study to evaluate alternative methods of providing drainage protection to the Rockaway area. Local cooperation. Local interests have agreed to provide lands and rights-of-way, including borrow areas; bear a portion of the total cost as a cash contribution; hold the United States free from damages; maintain, during economic life of a project, continued public ownership and use of non-Federal publiclyowned shores upon which Federal participation in beach protection is based; maintain and operate all works after completion, control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers. The project cooperation agreement for additional renourishment over the nine year period was executed on 25 May 1995. Operations and results during period and condition as of September 30. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council of Environmental Quality on April 16, 1971. Initial beach restoration was completed in FY 1977. Contract for first increment of periodic nourishment was completed in August, 1982. Contract for construction of a stone groin at Beach 149th Street was completed in September, 1982. Periodic nourishment contracts Nos. 3, 4, and 5 were completed between 1978 and 1988. Contract No. 6 was completed by NATCO Limited Partners in November 1996. The contract included beachfill placement of approximately 3 million cubic yards of sand from Beach 19th to Beach 149th St. 24. FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, NY Location. That portion of Atlantic Coast of Long Island in Suffolk County extending from Fire Island Inlet easterly to Montauk Point, N.Y. about 83 miles long. This frontage comprises about 70 percent of total ocean frontage of Long Island. 2-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Fire Island Inlet is about 50 miles by water east of the Battery, New York. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 13209, 12354 and 12353.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation in improvement to prevent beach erosion and hurricane damages by: widening beaches along developed areas between Kismet and Mecox Bay, to a minimum width 100 feet at elevation 14 feet above mean sea level; raising dunes to an elevation of 20 feet above mean sea level from Fire Island Inlet to Hither Hills State Park, at Montauk and opposite Lake Montauk Harbor; planting grass on dunes; constructing gated interior drainage structures at Mecox Bay, Sagaponack Lake, and Georgica Pond; constructing up to 50 groins, if needed; and Federal participation in cost of beach nourishment. Local Cooperation. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation is the local cooperating agency. The State agreed to provide necessary lands, rights of way and borrow areas, and furnish 30 percent of the project costs for the Interim Project along the Moriches Inlet to Shinnecock Inlet reach of the authorized project. The State has also agreed to be the local sponsor for interim projects immediately west of Shinnecock Inlet and along Fire Island. Project history. On July 30, 1963, the State reflecting the desires of Suffolk County, requested the inclusion of a minimum of 13 groins in initial construction of Moriches- Shinnecock reach. Chief of Engineers concurred in inclusion of up to 13 groins. Assurances were executed by Superintendent of Public Works, State of New York, on August 14, and accepted by the District Engineer August 20, 1963. On February 5, 1964, the State requested consideration of a plan, as proposed by Suffolk County, for initial construction of 13 groins of which 11 would be in the Moriches-Shinnecock reach, and 2 in the Southampton-Beach Hampton reach vicinity of Georgica Pond, and that sandfill and dune construction be withheld for the present except for 1 mile on each side of Shinnecock Inlet. On February 27, 1964, the chief of Engineers accepted the proposals, in part, and supplemental assurances were executed by State of New York on April 20, 1964, and accepted by District Engineer April 27, 1964, as follows: the State of New York now elects to proceed with authorized combined beach erosion control and hurricane protection project for South Shore of Long Island; that Superintendent of Public Works hereby reaffirms his assurance of August 14, 1963, relative to complete project; that State of New York, as cooperating agency, will now agree that artificial fills will be added when and to extent found necessary by the Chief of Engineers, but not earlier than 3 years after completion of groins unless both the State of New York and the Chief of Engineers mutually agree to an earlier placement; that the superintendent agrees for State of New York to contribute the full amount of any increase in Federal costs resulting from the separate construction of the groins and subsequent fill; and that the State agree that construction of the two groins in the Georgica Pond area will depend on a favorable finding, following a study by the Chief of Engineers. Study was completed July 31, 1964, recommending construction, and approved by the Chief of Engineers on September 22, 1964. By letter dated November 5, 1964, the New York State Department of Public Works confirmed that title to all properties and interests in properties necessary for constructing the 11 groins was fully vested in Suffolk County. By letter dated December 7, 1964, the Department stated that the county had obtained easements or fee title for the parcels necessary for constructing the two groins. New York State Department of Public Works Furnished $884,600 and $830,330 required contributed funds October 30, 1964, and September 7, 1965, respectively, for construction of 11 groins in Moriches-Shinnecock reach and $439,900 on January 22, 1965, for construction of 2 groins in Georgica Pond area of the Southampton-Beach Hampton reach, The completed 2 groins and 11 groins were accepted by the New York State Department of Public Works for maintenance on May 11, 1966 and April 10, 1967 respectively. On March 22, 1965, the State recommended that planning priority be in the order: Southampton-Beach Hampton (Drainage structures first): Shinnecock Inlet-Southampton; Beach Hampton-Montauk Point; and Fire Island-Moriches Inlet. Planning on the drainage structures was initiated but was suspended, based on: meeting of October 28, 1965 with Georgica Pond Association and the Preservation Society of East End wherein concern was indicated regarding the effects of the proposed drainage structure on ecology, salinity, pond level and aesthetic values; meeting with the Congressional representatives, State legislators, Federal agencies and local officials held on May 26, 1966: and resolution of the Suffolk County Board of Supervisors adopted June 13, 1966 requesting advancement of the planning of the Fire Island-Moriches Inlet reach (Fire Island National Seashore). On June 16, 1967, the New York State Department of Public Works requested the following works undertaken as immediate priority items: in Moriches- Shinnecock reach, beach and dune fill at 11 groin site, construction of four groins west of the completed 11 groins, beach and dune fill east of the 11 groins; in Southampton-Beach Hampton reach (at East Hampton), construction of two additional groins, and the outlet structure at Georgica Pond. On March 18, 1968 the Suffolk County Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution supporting construction of 4 groin in Reach 2 (Moriches-Shinnecock) and 2 groins in Reach 4 (Southampton-Beach Hampton). On April 22, 1968 the Board adopted a more inclusive resolution authorizing participation in beach erosion and hurricane protection for the Moriches- Shinnecock reach and in the Georgica Pond area of the Southampton-Beach Hampton reach. On December 24, 1968, the Commissioner of the New York State Conservation Department executed the second supplement to the assurances of local cooperation, which was accepted by the District Engineer on January 24, 1969. The reaffirmed previous assurances contained provisions for constructing four additional groins in an area extending 6,000 feet west from the most westerly groin in the existing eleven-groin field in the Moriches Inlet to Shinnecock Inlet Reach, and for placing 2-14 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT beach and dune fill in this area to the full design cross section as defined in the authorized project report. A General Design Memo completed in 1980 recommended placement of sand fill in the existing 11 groin field and along 9,500 feet of shore to the west. Condition as of September 30. Engineering and design began November 1962 and the project construction commenced in January 1965. Two groins in Reach 4: Southampton-Beach Hampton, Section 3, were initiated in March, and completed in September 1965, at a total cost of $720,950 of which $382,109 were incurred against required contributed funds. Eleven groins in Reach 2: Moriches-Shinnecock, Section 2, were initiated in January 1965, and completed in October 1966 at a total cost of $2,854,565 of which $1,370.191 were incurred against required contributed funds. Initial beach fill placement for 750,000 cubic yards in Reach 2. Section 1A was completed on May 23, 1969. On August 4, 1969 work started on 4 groins and sandfill in Reach 2, Section 1A and was completed November 14, 1970. 3,083 tons of stone and 1,111,000 cubic yards of sand was placed. Total cost for all Section 1A was $3,663,455 including $1,791,428 in required contributed funds. Funds in the amount of $70,000 were allotted on April 14, 1977 for initiation of the Phase 1 study in Reach 1, Fire Island Inlet to Moriches Inlet. The Final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with Environmental Protection Agency on January 28, 1978. On March 7, 1978, the Department of the Interior, supported by the other environmental resource agencies referred the Environmental Impact Statement to Council on Environmental Quality as unacceptable. On June 6 1978 the Council agreed and recommended project reformulation. Public meetings were held in October 1979 to delineate the scope and level of effort needed to reformulate the the project. A final scoping session was held January 17, 1980 and agreement was reached between the Federal agencies although New York State had strong objections. A plan of study was completed in July 1980. However, because of New York State's inability to financially participate in construction at Westhampton Beach, reformulation was postponed. Two breaches (new inlets) occurred in the vulnerable Westhampton area during periods of storm tides, one in Jan. 1980, just east of the Moriches inlet, and the most recent in Dec. 1992, at the eastern end of Moriches Bay. Both breaches were filled in by contract, the last one completed in Sept. 1993, at a cost of 7 million. In April 1993, the State provided a letter of intent to participate in an interim project for the Moriches Inlet to Shinnecock Inlet Reach. Based on this agreement in 1993 on a conceptual plan for the most critically eroded reach of the authorized project, the Westhampton Interim Project, the Reformulation Study was reinitiated. A construction contract for the Westhampton Interim Project was awarded in May 1996 to Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company in the amount of 16 million. The contract was substantially completed in December 1997 and included beach placement of 4 million cubic yards of sand, dune creation, fencing and grass planting, groin modifications and construction of public dune walkovers. In January 1996, a Breach Contingency Plan was approved, which provides a mechanism for rapid response to breaches along the barrier island, within the authorized project. The Reformulation Study, which has been consistently funded since 1993, is currently underway. Data has been collected including beach profile surveys and aerial topography maps of the entire 83 mile long shoreline. Initial scoping for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement has been conducted. The study is scheduled to be completed in June 2002. Based on requests from local, state and congressional interests, evaluations are underway for separable interim measures along Fire Island and immediately west of Shinnecock Inlet. 25. RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, NJ Location. Situated at the southern end of Lower New York Bay between the Raritan River and Sandy Hook, in Middlesex and Monmouth Counties, New Jersey. Shoreline area is typified by small developing communities built upon and near salt and freshwater marshes. The study area is largely located in low elevation regions with numerous small creeks providing drainage. Low-lying residential and commercial structures in the area are experiencing flooding caused by coastal storm inundation. Problem has progressively worsened due to loss of protective beaches and increased urbanization in the area with structures susceptible to flooding from rainfall and coastal storm surges, erosion and wave attack, combined with restrictions to channel flow in the tidal creeks. Existing Project. Existing Federal project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 12 October 1962 as a dual purpose Beach Erosion Control and Hurricane Protection Project in accordance with House Document No. 464, 86th Congress, Second session. This project provided for beach fill, groins, and levees for various sections of the study area. The constructed project consists of segmented sections of beach fill and levees surrounding the communities at Old Bridge Township and Keansburg and East Keansburg. A study was authorized by a resolution of the Committee on Public Works and Transportation, U.S. House of Representatives, adopted August 1, 1990. The study seeks to determine the advisability to the recommendations in the authorizing report for Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay. Local Cooperation. The non-Federal sponsor, NJDEP, is currently cost sharing a number of Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, NJ, feasibility studies with USACE: Port Monmouth, Union Beach, and Cliffwood Beach. The non-Federal sponsor would also be required to cost share in feasibility studies for the communities of Leonardo, Highlands and Keyport in order for them to proceed. (The non-Federal sponsor also operates and maintains the existing, constructed project). Operation and results during period, and condition as of Sept. 30. Construction of the authorized project for Old Bridge 2-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Township was initiated in 1965 and completed in 1966. Construction of the shoreline portion of the authorized project for Keansburg and East Keansburg was initiated in 1968 and completed in 1969. Construction of the closure portion (levees, closure gate and pumping station) of the authorized project for Keansburg and East Keansburg was initiated in 1970 and completed in 1973. Cliffwood Beach and Union Beach were the only portions of the authorized project that were not constructed. After construction of the closure work all of the completed works were formally turned over to the State of New Jersey in 1974. A reconnaissance study was completed in March 1993.. Subsequently, a feasibility study for Port Monmouth was initiated in February 1994, and for Union Beach and Cliffwood Beach in April 1997. In FY 1998 funds were utilized for the report preparation for Port Monmouth. In addition, FY 1998 funds were also used to continue feasibility study activities for Union Beach, and to complete planning and engineering prefeasibility activities for Leonardo. Pre-feasibility study activities for Highlands and Keyport also continued in FY 1998. Since Congress provided the funds, the feasibility study for Cliffwood Beach continued in FY 1998. Public involvement, and local coordination ongoing with the non-Federal sponsor and environmental resource agencies for the various active studies and investigations. 26. ROCKAWAY INLET TO NORTON POINT (CONEY ISLAND AREA), NY Location. Atlantic Coast of New York City, in Brooklyn (Kings County), approximately nine miles south of the Battery, N.Y. City. Authorized project. Authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The authorized plan provides for beach erosion control by restoring the Coney Island public beach up to 250 feet beyond its historic shoreline; the extension of the westerly terminal groin; construction of a terminal groin at the easterly end of the restored beach, and a fillet of beachfill from the terminal groin at W. 37th St. extending approximately 2300 ft. into the community of Sea Gate. The authorized plan also provides for restoration of the beach by periodic beach nourishment. The project was modified by the Intermodel Surface Transportation and Efficiency Act (ISTEA) of 1991 to include the relocation of existing comfort and lifeguard stations at full Federal expense. The total Federal cost of the project is $91,000,000 and non-Federal cost is $46,600,000. Local cooperation. The local sponsor is the N.Y. State Dept. of Environmental Conservation. In accordance with the provisions of the Project Cooperation Agreement, the sponsor will; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way including borrow areas necessary for construction of the project, hold and save the United States free from claims for damages which may result from the construction works and subsequent maintenance of the project; provide a cash contribution toward the total first cost; assure that water pollution that would affect the health of bathers will not be permitted; assure continued conditions of public ownership and use of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based, during the economic life of the project; maintain public use facilities open and available to all on equal terms and maintain all improvements after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army, including periodic nourishment during the economic life of the project as may be required to serve the intended purpose, subject to Federal participation in the cost of periodic nourishment for the economic project life. Operations and results during period, and condition as of September 30. Initial construction of the beach and 37th Street jetty was completed in January, 1995. The design of the comfort and lifeguard stations was completed in 1996. Adequate funding is not available to proceed with construction. Post-construction monitoring continued in FY 98. A study that evaluated the causes of the accelerated beach erosion downdrift of the W. 37th Street groin and identified alternatives for a solution. The report was completed in March 1998. The report recommends three alternative solutions. An environment assessment of the alternatives is underway. 27. SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, NJ Location. The northern portion of the Atlantic coast of New Jersey extending from Sandy Hook southerly to Barnegat Inlet - length about 48 miles. Erosion has seriously reduced the width of most beaches in the study area with consequent exposure of the shore to storm damage. Because of this erosion of the shore the area does not provide sufficient recreational beaches for the proper accommodation of the present and prospective tributary population. SECTION I - SEA BRIGHT TO OCEAN TOWNSHIP, NJ Location. That portion of the Atlantic coast of New Jersey in Monmouth County extending from Sea Bright southerly to Ocean Township - length about 12 miles. Sea Bright is about 30 miles by water south of the Battery, New York City. Authorized project. The Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (PL 100-670 authorized a plan substantially in accordance with the plan recommended in the General Design Memorandum for the project dated May, 1988. In general the plan provides for beach erosion control along approximately 12 miles of coastline, extending from Sea Bright southward to Ocean Township, New Jersey, by artificial placement of sand to widen the beach berm to 100 feet at an elevation of 10 feet above mean low water with an additional 2 foot high berm cap to provide an extra increment of protection from overtopping. The project also provides for the notching of 15 groins, and periodic nourishment throughout the 50 year economic life of the project. Total estimated Federal cost for Section 1 is 2-16 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT $597,600,000. Total estimated non-Federal cost for all requirements of local cooperation is $321,600,000. Local cooperation. Includes reconstruction of sea wall at Sea Bright and all lands easements, rights of way and drainage outfall extensions. Operations and results during period and condition as of September 30. The Local Cooperation Agreement for Section I was executed with the State of New Jersey on July 30, 1992. Work under Contract 1A was completed in Nov. 1995. Approximately 4.4 million cubic yards of sand was placed under Contract 1A at an estimated cost of $21 million. Work under Contract lB was completed in October 1996. Approximately 3.8 million cubic yards of sand was placed under Contract lB at an estimated cost of $15.8 million. Construction on Contract 2 (Long Branch) began in May 1997 and is continuing. SECTION II- ASBURY PARK TO MANASQUAN, NJ Location. That portion of the Atlantic coast of New Jersey in Monmouth County extending from Asbury Park southerly to Manasquan - length about 9 miles. Authorized project. Provides for Federal participation in the restoration and protection of the shore from Asbury Park to Manasquan by artificial placement of sand to widen the beach to a minimum width of 100 feet at an elevation of 10 feet above mean low water. The project provides for Federal participation in periodic nourishment costs for a period of 50 years from the year that the total quantity to fill placed has equalled that required to restore the beach to project dimensions. Total estimated Federal cost is $381,400,000. Total estimated Non- Federal costs for all requirements of local cooperation is $205,400,000. Operations and results during period and condition as of September 30. The local cooperation agreement for Section II was executed with the State of New Jersey on August 20, 1996. The contract for the Southern Reach (Belmar to Manasquan) was awarded in March 1997. Construction began in June 1997 and is continuing. The award of the Northern Reach (Asbury Park to Avon-by-the-Sea) contract is scheduled for May, 1999. 28. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 2-H at end of chapter). 29. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach Erosion Control activities pursuant to Section 103 Publ. Law 826, 84th congress as amended (See Table 2-0 at end of chapter). FLOOD CONTROL 30. THE HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS AREA, NJ Location. The project location is the Hackensack Meadowlands River Basin in Bergen and Hudson Counties, New Jersey. Existing Project. The program was authorized by Section 324 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 and amended by Section 550 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. The program was authorized for $5,000,000. The objective of the program is to provide design and construction assistance for the development of the Environmental Improvement Program within the Hackensack Meadowlands District of New Jersey. The intent of the program is to assist the Hackensack Meadowlands Development Commission in: tide gate improvements to control flooding in the Berry's Creek drainage basin, the mitigation, enhancement and acquisition of wetlands, the development and implementation of a system to provide for water quality monitoring and wetland control in the Hackensack Meadowlands River Basin. A hydraulic modeling study of the Hackensack River will be performed and it will also examine a proposed tide gate on Berry's Creek. The Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station will be performing the modeling study. Local Cooperation. The Non-Federal sponsor is the Hackensack Meadowlands Development Commission (HMDC). Operations and results during the period and condition as of September 30. The General management Plan, which outlines the management process for implementing the program, was completed in October 1998. A total of $2.5 million was appropriated for the program in FY 1996. Discussions with the HMDC and negotiation of the PCA for the hydraulic modeling study is expected to be completed in April 1999 and submission of the Project Cooperation Agreement to HQUSACE is expected in May 1999. The modeling study is expected to take one year to complete. 31. JOSEPH G. MINISH PASSAIC RIVER WATERFRONT AND HISTORIC AREA, NJ Location. The project area is located along the west bank of the Passaic River between Bridge and Brill Streets in the City of Newark, New Jersey. This reach of the Passaic River is eroded, deteriorated and environmentally degraded due to past heavy commercial and industrial use and flooding. The most recent flooding occurred in December 1992. In light of the renewal of the commercial downtown area of Newark near the Passaic river, the project area is viewed as an environmental resource to be restored. Authorized project. The project was authorized in the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1990 (Public Law 101-640) as an element of the Passaic River Flood Damage 2-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Reduction Project on November 28, 1999, modified in the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-580) by extending the project area, and further modified in the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-303). The project has three phases. The first phase will provide 6,000 feet of new bulkhead, 3,200 feet of restored riverbank and wetlands. The second phase adds a 9,200-foot waterfront walkway and the third phase adds park facilities, plazas and landscaping. Links to the Arts Center, Riverbank Park, and other sites will also be provided. The project will reduce the flooding and erosion and provide environmental restoration, recreation and economic development benefits. The cost of the first phase is $35,700,000, adding the second phase increases the cost to $57,800,000, and the third phase brings the total project cost to $76,200,000. The sponsor of the first phase is the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and cost sharing is set at 75% Federal and 25% non-Federal. The State may reduce its share through credit provisions in WRDA 1992. The credit consists of the value of lands in the basin that the State puts into wetlands bank. Local cooperation. Project will be operated and maintained by sponsor as each portion is completed. Operations and results during period and condition as of September 30. The draft Design Memorandum and Environmental Assessment were completed in August 1995. The final was completed in May 1996. Currently, preparation is underway for initiation of construction on the first phase. The plans and specifications have been prepared and permits issued. A ground breaking is being targeted in Summer 1999 pending execution of the Project Cooperation Agreement, and real estate acquisition. Available funds will be utilized to construct a section of the bulkhead. Additional appropriations will be required to complete the first phase. Interest is also being expressed by Newark to begin the second phase, the walkway. A sponsor would be required and funds appropriated before and action can be taken on the second phase. 32. NORTH ELLENVILLE, NY Location. In Ellenville, N.Y., on Beer Kill and Fantine Kill, at their confluence with Sandburg Creek, which discharges into Rondout Creek at Napanoch, N.Y., about 2 miles downstream from Ellenville. (See Geological Survey, Ellenville quadrangle). Existing project. Improvement includes construction of levees and floodwalls along Beer Kill and Fantine Kill-I capping retaining walls along Beer Kill; removing concrete dam, channel improvements and stream diversion on Fantine Kill; providing interior drainage including diversion ditches, drainage structures, ponding areas; alteration of 6 bridges: and relocating structures and utilities. The project was completed in 1975. Since that time severe storms in March 1980 and April 1987 caused erosion of the riprap bank protection and significant damage to the project floodwalls and levees, Subsequent repairs to damaged areas were undertaken in 1981-82, 1987-88 and in 1996-97 under PL-84-99 authority. A Design Deficiency Report was prepared recommending repair, reinforcement, and replacement of undermined floodwalls, placement of riprap protection along the Beer Kill Channel bottom and toes of banks; repair and replacement of riprap along the side slopes and toes of the levees, and possible removal of a rock outcrop to reduce erosive velocities. The current Federal cost estimate is $6,100,000 (Oct. 94-P.L.) Local cooperation. Assurances of Local Cooperation were received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in 1968 and 1970. An additional Local Cooperation Agreement was signed in November 1987 to cover the repairs accomplished through the PL-84-99 effort. In a letter dated 9 November 1990, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation indicated their willingness to participate and act as local sponsor under the terms of Section 414 of the 1990 Water Resources Development Act. The Project Cooperation Agency (PCA) was executed in Jan. 1995. Operation and results during period, and condition as of Sept. 30. Construction was completed in September 1996 and the project was turned over to the New York Department of Environmental Conservation in February 1997. 33. NEW YORK CITY WATERSHED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM, NY Location. The project location is the New York City Watershed, which is located within the following counties in New York State: Delaware, Greene, Schoharie, Ulster, Sullivan, Westchester, Putnam and Dutchess. Existing project. The program was authorized by Section 552 of the Water resources Development Act of 1996. The program was authorized for $22,500,000. The objective of the program is to provide design and construction assistance for waterrelated environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development projects in the New York City Watershed, including projects for water supply, storage, treatment and distribution facilities and surface water resource protection and development. Twenty-three projects have been certified by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) and recommended for implementation. The types of projects include stream restoration, installation of sanitary sewer lines, stormwater studies, pathogen monitoring, planning and implementation of agricultural non-point source pollution reduction and watershed protection training. Local cooperation. The Non-Federal sponsor is the NYDEC. The projects will be accomplished by the local sponsors, the New York City Department of Environmental Protection, municipalities and counties. Operations and results during the period and condition as of September 30. The General Management Plan, which outlines the management process for implementing the program, was completed in September 1998. A total of $7.0 million has 2-18 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT been appropriated for the program in FY 1997 through 1999. The request for proposals, under which the proposed projects were submitted, evaluated and certified for implementation, was completed in February 1999. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) for the first project, the Prattsville Stream Management Project, was submitted to Corps of Engineers Headquarters in March 1999. Discussions with the local sponsors and negotiations of the PCA's for the certified projects commenced in February 1999. 34. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN, NJ & NY Location. The Passaic Basin, comprising 787 square miles in northeastern New Jersey and 148 square miles in southern New York State, is located in the greater New York City Metropolitan area. The Passaic River Basin is roughly elliptical in shape 26 miles long and 56 miles wide - and contains portions or Bergen, Essex, Morris, Passaic, Hudson, Somerset, Sussex and Union Counties in New Jersey. The Basin also includes parts of Orange and Rockland Counties in New York. Previous projects. Three Federal flood control projects have been completed by the Corps of Engineers in the Passaic River Basin. A $67,400 de-snagging, debris removal, and channel restoration project was completed in 1951 along Beaver Brook and the Pequannock Township Ditch, tributaries of the Pompton River in Pequannock Township, NJ. Along the Pompton River, a channel clearing project including shoal removal and channel restoration was implemented in the two-mile reach from the Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Bridge to the Erie Railroad (Greenwood Lake Branch) Bridge. This work, in Pequannock Township, Wayne Township and Lincoln Park Borough, NJ, was completed in 1954 at a cost of $50,000. A $1.5 million basin-wide project to improve the Flood Warning and Preparedness System was completed in 1988. The project was implemented by the Corps of Engineers in conjunction with the National Weather Service and U.S. Geological Survey, the State of New Jersey is the non-Federal sponsor of the project. Project history. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers involvement in Passaic River planning was first authorized in the Flood Control Acts of 1936. Since then, reports recommending plans of action were issued in 1939, 1948, 1962, 1972, and 1973. None of these plans were implemented because they did not receive widespread public support. In 1976, Congress authorized a Phase I Advanced Engineering and Design Study in Section 101(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976. Congressional Guidance on the conduct of the study was provided in House Report 94-1702. Local protection plans were completed for tributary flood damage areas along the Ramapo and Mahwah Rivers at Mahwah, N.J., and Suffern, N.Y., Molly Ann's Brook at Haledon, Prospect Park and Paterson, N.J., the Ramapo River at Oakland, N.J., and the Lower Saddle River in Bergen County, N.J. These projects were authorized in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Construction began on the Molly Ann's Brook project in 1995. The Ramapo River at Oakland project received construction funds in Fiscal Year 1995 and was reauthorized in WRDA 1996. In April 1984, the Passaic Basin experienced flooding estimated to be the worst in 40 years. In June 1984, the State of New Jersey selected a dual inlet diversion tunnel plan as the preferred Basin-wide alternative for detailed plan formulation. The Phase I General Design Memorandum and draft Environmental Impact Statement, (EIS), recommending the Pompton River/Passaic Dual Inlet Tunnel Diversion Plan, were completed during FY 1988. The final EIS was filed with EPA in December 1988. Section 101 (a) 18 of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) 1990 (PL 101-640), as modified by section 102 (p) of WRDA '92 (PL 102-580) authorizes construction of the Passaic River Flood Protection Project for the Passaic River Basin which will address both environmental and engineering objectives of the Act. The Passaic River Flood Protection Project combines diversion tunnels, levees, flood walls, channel modification, and natural flood storage to provide flood protection to about 35 towns in the Passaic River Basin. Preconstruction Engineering and Design for the Passaic River Flood Protection Project was initiated in FY 1989 and is continuing with preparation of a General Design Memorandum and Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement with accompanying project cost estimate, and update of buy-out plans. A draft report was completed in Sept. 1995. The final report was completed in July 1996 with the State's decision to implement the natural flood storage areas at this time. Engineering and design for the Joseph G. Minish Passaic River Waterfront Park and Historic Area project element, Consisting of environmental and streambank restoration measures in the city of Newark was completed in May 1996. Condition as of September 30. Construction is continuing on Molly Ann's Brook and the Ramapo River at Oakland. Construction of the Joseph G. Minish Passaic River and Waterfront Park is scheduled for 1999. The purchases of the national flood storage areas is scheduled for 1999. The Saddle River and Mahwah River projects are on hold pending local support. 35. PRESERVATION OF NATURAL FLOOD STORAGE - PASSAIC RIVER FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION REPORT, NJ Location. Flooding has long been a problem in the Passaic River Basin. Since colonial times, floods have claimed lives and damaged property. The most severe flood, the "flood of record", occurred in 1903, and more recent floods in 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, two in 1975, 1984 and 1992 were sufficiently devastating to warrant Federal Disaster declarations. 2-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 The flood of 1984 resulted in the loss of three lives and caused $493 million in damages (October 1994 dollars). Authorized project. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has been working on plans to reduce flooding in the basin since 1936, but no plan has yet been implemented. Congress authorized a new study of the Passaic River Basin for the State of New Jersey in the Water Resources Department Act (WRDA) of 1976 (Public Law 94-587) which led to a plan authorized in WRDA 1990 and modified in WRDA 1992. The project includes several elements (see separate fact sheet on Passaic River). The element described herein is the Preservation of Natural Flood Storage Areas which the State has asked to Corps to implement. The Preservation element includes the acquisition of 5,350 acres of natural storage areas, 5,200 acres of which are wetlands and could conceivably be developed, worsening existing flood problems. The State of New Jersey has an agreement with the Corps to continue to protect 6,300 floodway acred, thus avoiding any secondary development. About 9,500 acres of the Central Basin are already protected as designated parkland, bringing the total of natural storage areas that would be permanently protected with the project to 21,000 acres. The Preservation element will prevent flood damages from becoming worse. It will not reduce flooding in the Passaic River Basin. The cost sharing is set at 75% Federal and 25% State. The State may reduce its share by applying credits included in the authorization. Local Cooperation. Project lands will be operated and maintained by non-Federal sponsors as each parcel is acquired. Operations and results during period and condition as of September 30. The General Design Memorandum for the element was completed in July 1996 and the State has requested that the Corps proceed with its implementation at a cost of $19.8 million dollars. Currently, the Corps has completed a Real Estate Design Memorandum for purchasing the preservation lands and is negotiating a Project Cooperation Agreement with the State as a non-Federal sponsor. Funds are available to begin purchases once the Agreement is signed. Purchases are scheduled to start Spring 1999. Total estimated Federal cost is $14,880,000. Total non-Federal costs for all requirements of local cooperation is $4,960,000. 36. RAMAPO RIVER AT OAKLAND, NJ Location. The project involves the construction of features for flood protection along the Ramapo River from Pompton Lake in Wayne Township and the Borough of Pompton Lakes, upstream through the Borough of Oakland to West Oakland Avenue, a distance of 3.3 miles. The principal problem along the Ramapo River is flooding caused by backwater effect produced by the Pompton Lake Dam, the hydraulic constrictions produced by bridges crossing the river, and insufficient channel capacity. Flooding has occurred frequently, with the most recent events in 1968, 1970, 1971, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1983, 1984, 1987, 1993, and as recently as January of last year. Authorized project. The Ramapo River was studied as part of the Passaic River Basin Phase I Advanced Engineering and Design Study which was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (Public Law 94-587, October 22, 1976). Congressional guidance for the conduct of the study is included in House of Representatives Report 94-1702. The study was authorized for construction under the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986 (Public Law 99-662) and reauthorized in WRDA 1996 (PL 104-303) The sponsor is the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. The authorized plan for flood damage reduction along the study area includes channel modification of 5,800 feet of the Ramapo River. The authorized plan also calls for the installation of flood control gates at the existing Pompton Lake Dam. Mitigation for the environmental impacts of the plan include the creation of a five-acre wetland in Potash Lake. The recommended plan would provide a consistent 40-year level of protection to the project area. The plan has an estimated cost of $12,600,000. The cost is shared by the Federal Government (75%) and the State (25%). The State share includes the cost for all lands, easements, and rights-of-way as well as a cash contribution. The State share may be reduced through the use of credits available for Passaic River Basin projects. Local cooperation. Non-Federal sponsor will operate and maintain project once construction is complete and project is turned-over to sponsor. Operations and results during period and condition as of September 30. Engineering and design commenced in October 1987. The final General Design Memorandum was completed in May 1994 and approved in July 1994. The Governor of New Jersey has indicated support for the project. Preparation of plans and specifications is nearly complete and a draft Project Cooperation Agreement has been negotiated with the State. Permits were issued in January 1999. Once the Project Cooperation Agreement is executed and real estate is acquired, construction can begin. Construction on the channel modification is scheduled for Fall 1999. Total estimated Federal cost is $9,475,000. Total estimated non-Federal costs for all requirements of local cooperation is $3,125,000. 37. RARITAN RIVER BASIN GREEN BROOK SUB-BASIN, NJ Location. The Green Brook Basin lies in central New Jersey within the counties of Somerset, Middlesex and Union and is one of the major tributaries in the Raritan River Basin. The Green Brook, which originates in the Watchung Mountains, has a 65-square mile watershed. The bell shaped basin widens markedly as Green Brook flows southwesterly to its mouth at the Raritan River. Project history. The Green Brook Flood Control Project is the result of efforts over the past three decades by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, other Federal agencies, state and local agencies, civic organizations and the general public. In 2-20 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT 1968, a reconnaissance investigation was conducted, under the Corps of Engineers Continuing Authority Program for small projects, for Ambrose, Bound and Bonygutt Brooks. The resulting report recommended further study at all three locations. Detailed project reports concluded that individual flood protection projects were not economically feasible at any of the locations. Subsequently, record floods occurred in 1971 and again in 1973, causing catastrophic damage throughout the basin. Following these floods, a study of the entire Green Brook Basin resulted in the Feasibility Report for Flood Control, Green Brook Sub-Basin, dated August 1980. The plan recommended in this report consisted of a system of levees and floodwalls to provide protection against a 150-year flood in the lower portion of the Green Brook Basin only. A more comprehensive, basin-wide solution would have also extended 150- year protection to the upper and Stony Brook portions of the basin. The Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors (BERH) reviewed the NAD report and issued its report on 16 March 1981, in which they endorsed all plan formulation decisions in the 1980 Feasibility Report. However, the BERH also stated that "the recommended 150-year level of protection is inadequate for this highly urbanized floodplain". to avoid catastrophic consequences of levee overtopping, the BERH recommended protection to 500-year level. The Chief of Engineers Report dated 4 September 1981. In February 1984, the Secretary of the Army expressed the administration's views in his letter transmitting the report to Congress in which he recommended that the August 1980 report should be authorized. The Water Resources Act of 1986 authorized construction of a project, providing protection in all three portions of the Green Brook Basin. Section 401a of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) 1986 authorizes construction of the Green Brook Flood Control Project for the Green Brook Subbasin, which will address both environmental and engineering objectives for the Act. The Green Brook Flood Control Project combines levees, floodwalls, channel modification, flood proofing, and natural flood storage to provide flood protection to about 13 municipalities in the Green Brook Sub-basin. On the basis of this authorization, funds were budgeted and appropriated for pre-construction engineering and design. Surveying, mapping and other studies necessary to provide the basis for actual construction commenced toward the end of 1986. Condition as of September 30. A General Reevaluation Report, dated May 1997 was signed by Assistant secretary of the Army (Civil Works) in October 1997. The report recommends flood protection for the Lower Basin and Stoney Brook Basin. Although economically justified, flood protection was deferred for the Upper basin at the request of the general sponsor, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Upper Basin Task Force, has been evaluating potential alternatives for providing flood protection in the Upper Basin. 38. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections of the following completed flood control works and beach erosion and hurricane protection projects were performed to determine the extent of compliance by local interests with operation and maintenance requirements. New England Adams, MA - Hoosic River Bennington, VT - Roaring Branch, Walloomsac River East Barre Dam, VT - Jail Branch Winooski River Montpelier Dam, VT - Winooski River North Adams, MA - Hoosic River Richford, VT - Missiquoi River Waterbury Dam, VT - Little River Wrightsville Dam, VT - North Branch, Winooski River Inspection Date Sept. 98 Sept. 98 Sept. 98 Sept. 98 Sept. 98 Sept. 98 Sept. 98 Sept. 98 NY - NJ Areas * E. Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet Elizabeth, NJ - Elizabeth River * Fire Is. Inlet to Montauk Pt., NY Herkimer, NY - Bellinger Brook & Mohawk River Holland Patent, NY - Thompson Creek Hoosic Falls, NY - Hoosic River Oct. 97 NI Oct. 97 Oct. 97 Oct. 97 Oct. 97 Kingston, NY - Esopus Creek Oct. 97 North Ellenville, NY - Beer & Fantine Kills & Sandburg Creek Oct. 97 Rahway, NJ - Rahway River, S. Branch Rahway River NI * Raritan Bay & Sandy Hook Bay, NJ Old Bridge, Keansburg & Middletown, NJ - NI Rosendale, NY - Roundout Creek Oct. 97 So. Amsterdam, NY - So. Chuctanunda Creek & Mohawk River Oct. 97 So. Orange NJ - E. Branch, Rahway River NI Yonkers, NY - Saw Mill River Nov. 97 Chappaqua, NY - Saw Mill River Nov. 97 Ardsley, NY - Saw Mill River Sandy Hook to Barnagat Inlet, N.J. Nov. 97 NI * Beach Erosion & Hurricane Protection Projects NI - Not Inspected FY 1997 2-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 39. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 2-1 at end of chapter.) 40. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong. as amended (Pre-authorization) (See Table 2-P at end of chapter). Natural Disaster and Emergency Flood Control Activities. Pursuant to Public Law 84-99 and antecedent legislation provides for disaster preparedness, emergency operation, rehabilitation, advance measures, emergency water, and drought assistance. Under disaster preparedness, the New York District initiated revisions to emergency response plans to include lessons learned from previous disasters, attended meetings and seminars dealing with emergency response planning and purchased supplies and equipment to maintain its' flood fight and response capability. Under disaster preparedness, the New York District initiated revisions to emergency response plans to include lessons learned from previous disasters, attended meetings and seminars dealing with emergency response planning and purchased supplies and equipment to maintain its' flood fight and response capability. Under emergency operations, the New York District conducted field investigations, provided technical assistance and sandbags to local and county government in response to flooding events. In response to Presidential disaster declarations under P.L. 93-288 the New York District received mission assignments from the Federal Emergency management Agency (FEMA) for generator repair and servicing during the Jan. 1998 NY ice storm and environmental technical assistance during the June 1998 flash flooding in NY. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 41. SURVEYS (See Table 2-J at end of chapter.) 42. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for the period of $165,571 for flood plain management services are set forth in Table 2-L at the end of chapter. 43. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Projects having all, or inactive or uncompleted portions deauthorized by Congressional Action pursuant to Water Resources Development Acts (See-Table 2-M at end of chapter.) 2-22 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT 2-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Projects Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY97 FY 98 September 30, 1998 1. Aauatic Plant New Work Control 2. Fire Island to Jones Inlet, NY 3. Hudson River, NY Approp Cost 4. Hudson River, NY New work (New York City to Approp. Waterford: Athens Channel) Cost 5. Jamaica Bay, NY New work Approp. Cost Maint. Appro. Cost 6. Jones Inlet, NY 7. Kill Van Kull-Newark Bay, NJ & NY 8. Moriches Inlet, NY 9. Narrows of Lake Champlain, NY 10. Newark Bay, Hackensack & Passaic River, NJ 11. New York Harbor and Adjacent Channels, Port Jersey Channel, NJ 220,000 14,822 131,523 86,771 145,377 7,810,000 -290,000 5,304,194 268,000 7,964,371 -291,724 5,270,950 158,315 17,000 254,000 2,142,000 335,000 22,229 250,173 2,130,088 -180,335 1,902,000 3,486,000 1,895,000 3,689,000 1,884,264 3,501,224 1,713,221 3,776,614 - - 300,000 8,700,000 - - 30,914 192,216 55,000 635,000 990,000 395,000 56,667 637,471 989,192 356,205 227,000 4,620,000 695,000 405,000 235,362 4,620,100 690,231 395,101 Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. 5,452,000 2,000,000 1,412,959 1,229,000 264,997,886 9,712,818 2,664,007 2,030,721 1,094,175 263,738,237 8 300,000 1,490,000 -46,000 77,509 1,536,336 383,395 30,483 - 1,115,000 -960,954 44,000 42,601 -47,000 345,117 45,000 46,334 46,000 28,837 96,275 93,226 366,000 419,500 11,911,000 365,262 387,356 11,925,238 34,000 322,000 563,000 140,258 252,578 463,110 9,801,000 9,768,324 1,124,422 970,376 681,811 681,811 1,656,365 1,576,012 29,014,500 29,014,500 38,467,867 38,449,223 1,372,000 1,201,064 2-24 TABLE 2-A 2,330,183 1 2,321,384 2 23,168,128 3 23,033,261 23,658.050 23,193,664 44,249,800 4, 5 44,249,865 60,949,450 6,7 60,736,133 9,000,000 223,130 4,545,750 4,545,750 12,339,750 12,277,058 1,822,530 1,822,530 23,995,500 23,980,000 New work Approp. Cost Maint. Appro. Cost New work Approp. Cost New work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Projects Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY97 FY 98 September 30, 1998 12. New York Harbor- Collection and Removal of Drift 13. New York Harbor- Entrance Channels & Anchorage Areas 14. New York and New Jersey Channels 15. Rondout Harbor NY 16. Shinnecock Inlet NY 17. Shoal Harbor/ Compton Creek, NJ 19. Supervisor of New York Harbor 22. Long Beach Island NY 23 East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, NY 24. Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, NY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 249,000 542,000 -105,000 2,038,476 1,860,052 741,285 456,393 4,450,000 4,978,000 4,623,000 4,810,000 4,512,698 4,986,697 4,570,944 4,859,837 6,525,000 6,475,000 9,545,000 8,544,000 6,676,873 6,471,462 9,515,720 8,442,420 42,000 45,521 50,000 49,746 44,000 3,453,000 44,394,000 42,601 3,353,643 44,469,574 440,000 1,957,000 426,184 1,945,141 - -100,000 100,000 927,947 799 35,680 68,000 68,763 42,370 -2,284,000 -2,234,810 45,541,000 42,407,937 103,761,250 10 104,019,773 45,009,710 45,009,710 Il 103,883,170 103,692,992 73,052,435 73,052,435 45,908,090 45,923,523 15,863,000 15,780,720 5,682,205 5,656,298 14,863,000 14,823,090 3,765,000 3,715,721 124,572 124,572 - - - 850,000 - - - 849,874 703,000 712,000 730,000 747,000 701,873 709,432 726,567 729,765 419,000 239,000 381,000 859,040 257,757 362,198 337,517 466,632 3,897,000 4,594,000 1,228,000 563,000 1,741,909 9,150,382 2,396,586 234,115 2,946,000 8,538,000 15,193,000 4,510,000 3,325,814 9,071,276 13,765,050 7,607,472 2,672,940 2,672,805 36,519,960 36,494,846 1,898,040 1,424,104 51,797,000 49,931,643 54,888,439 53,766,275 12 13 113,970 143,753 2-25 TABLE 2-A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 2-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Projects Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY97 FY 98 September 30, 1997 25. Raritan Bay and New Work Sandy Hook Bay, NJ 26. Rockaway Inlet to Norton Point (Coney Island), NY 27. Sandy Hook to Bamegat Inlet, NJ 30. Hackensack Meadowlands, NJ 31. Joseph G. Minish Waterfront Park, NJ 32. North Ellenville. NY 33. New York City Watershed, NY 34. Passaic Mainstem NJ 35. Preservation of Natural Storage Areas, NJ 36. Ramapo at Oakland NJ 37. Raritan River Basin Green Brook Sub-basin NJ Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work. Aprop. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 110,000 21,000 20,868 130 188,000 25,932 3,075,000 -700,000 300,000 1,639,000 6,220,317 1,206,038 607,193 715,734 1,016,000 12,958,000 35,929,573 22,696,000 11,600,136 17,700,877 27,166,129 28,394,251 2,500,000 1,711 20,253 187,737 21,252 900,000 3,000,000 331,157 594,915 -105,000 1,921,000 182,844 1,894,610 -172,000 24,228 - - 1,000,000 - - 51,656 - - -1,400,000 9,253,183 1,767,021 611,699 S- 500,000 - - 104,747 600,000 540,289 52,283 96,000 57,765 6,975 50,000 136,616 -26,000 237,000 467,000 22,599 113,710 288,073 -2,861,000 2,780,000 2,911,000 -4,031,169 3,090,080 2,157,946 954,000 787,335 19,640,765 17,181,027 14 119,001,573 111,412,795 15 2,500,000 230,953 3,900,000 926,072 3,240,000 3,219,946 1,096,000 109,421 63,459,669 62,938,938 550,000 241,360 2,693,000 2,362,335 26,909,610 26,031,084 1. Of which $12,500 is for North Atlantic Division Accounts. 2. Of which $12,127 is for North Atlantic Division Accounts. 3. Exludes $90,190 for new work expended from contributed funds. Additional NY State Funds were $200,000 in 1990, $581,000 in 1991, $611,574 in 1996, $2,093,194 in 1997 and 4. Includes $5,112,694 for new work for previous project. 5. Includes $238,350 for new work expended from public works funds and $311,461 emergency relief funds. Excludes $81,373 expended from contributed funds. 6. Excludes $454,273 expended between August 18, 1915 and June 30, 1935, for operation and care of lock and dam at Troy, N.Y., under permanent indefinite appropriation. Excludes $23,735 reimbursement for repairs to Troy Lock. 7. Includes $346,797 for maintenance for previous project. 8. Includes $65,317,927 from contributed funds. 9. Includes $115,000 for new work for previous projects. 10. Includes $2,491,206 expended to date for construction of a land-based overfire air pit incinerator ($1,493,393 in maintenance funds and $997,813 in 0 & M funds.) 11. Includes $116,530 applied to removing wrecks authorized by acts prior to adoption of existing projects. 12. Includes $22,777,035 from contributed funds. 13. Includes $8,700,000 contributed funds. 14. Includes $5,700,000 from contributed funds. 15. Includes $23,500,000 from contributed funds. 2-26 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized River and Harbor Act of 1959 Section 104 and Harbor Act of 1958 Section 302 River and Harbor act of 1965 August 26, 1937 May 17,1950 1958 River & Harbor Act 1962 River & Harbor Act March 1988 June 25, 1910 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 July 1, 1935 August 30, 1935 June 20, 1938 September 3, 1954 P.L. 89-72 September, 1996 Rivers and WRDA, 1997 June 25, 1910 March 2, 1945 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text) Control and progressive eradication of obnoxious Aquatic Plant growths Provided that all research and planning cost to be borne fully by the United States Modified project to include control of waterchestnut FIRE ISLAND TO JONES INLET, N.Y. (See Section 2 of Text) construction of jetty. Channel 10 feet deep. Three dredging operations with sand serving as nourishment to the beaches westerly of the inlet Extension of existing jetty, a littoral reservoir, a navigation channel and dikes, sand deposit on westerly beaches 14 foot channel with sand placed along Gilgo Beach HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep from Hudson to Waterford, remove State lock and dam at Troy and construct a new lock and dam. Channel 27 feet deep from Hudson to Albany, NY Channel 27 feet below Hudson. Operation and care of lock and dam at Troy were included in project. Relocation of 12 foot channel between Troy and Waterford. Deepen channel between Albany and Waterford to 14 feet with no change in depths for harbors in front of Albany & Troy. Deepen channel between New York City and Albany to 32 feet and construct a turning basin and 2 anchorages. Mooring facilities Note: The 12 and 27 foot classification have been deauthorized. HUDSON RIVER AT ATHENS, N.Y. (See Section 4 of Text) The District will coordinate the assessment report to address the need for additional formulation and economic analysis to determine economic viability. JAMAICA BAY, N.Y. (See Section 5 of Text) Construction of 1 jetty. Interior channel along west shore of bay, 18 and 12 feet deep; interior channel along south shore, 15 feet deep; entrance channel 20 and 18 feet deep; and 1 riprap jetty all in lieu of work heretofore authorized. Modified conditions of local cooperation. 2-27 H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., Ist sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 33, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 762, 80th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 411, 84th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 115, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 719, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 350, 68st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 210, 70th Cong., Ist sess. S. Doc. 155, 72th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 572, 75th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 228, 83rd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Act of 1910 modified by Section 110 of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1997 H. Doc. 1488, 72nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 700, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. TABLE 2-B Act Document REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 2-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act Work Authorized Document May 17, 1950 March 2, 1945 FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act. (PL99-98) July 14, 1960 August 8, 1917 March 2, 1907 February 27, 1911 July 25, 1912 January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 March 22, 1945 March 2, 1945 September 3, 1954 October 23, 1962 Channel 15 feet deep in Mott Basin including its 2 branches. JONES INLET, N.Y. (See Section 6 of Text) Construction of jetty and channel 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide. KILL VAN KULL-NEWARK BAY, N.J. & N.Y. (See Section 7 of Text) Deepening existing 35 foot channels in increments to 40 feet and then 45 feet. MORICHES INLET, N.Y. (See Section 8 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide in inlet and 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide in the Bay and 2 jetties. NARROWS OF, LAKE CHAMPLAIN, N.Y. AND VERMONT (See Section 9 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide. NEWARK BAY, HACKENSACK & PASSAIC RIVER, N.J. (See Section 10 of Text) 16-foot channel in Passaic River Widening 16-foot channel in Passaic River 20-foot channel in Passaic River. 10-foot channel in Passaic River. 30-foot channel in Passaic River. 35 and 37 feet in main channel of Newark Bay and branch channel to an inshore channel at Port Newark terminal and remove portion of rock area at Bergen Point to same depths. Modification of local cooperation for 10-foot channel in Passaic River. 34-32 foot channel in Hackensack River including approach channel in Newark Bay from branch channel at Port Newark Terminal and a 25-foot turning basin. 35-foot channels at Port Elizabeth H. Doc. 665,80th Cong. H. Doc 409, 77th Cong. PL 99-662 PL 91-611 H. Doc. 126, 86th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbor Committee H. Doc. 441, 59th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 441, 59th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 707, 62nd Cong., H. Doc- 284, 60th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 156, 71st Cong. 2nd sess. S. Doc. 250 79th Cong. 2nd sess. H. Doc. 430, 76th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 252, 82nd Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 289, 88th Cong. 2nd sess. November 7, 1966 WRDA 1986 Widening 35-foot channel in Newark Bay, provision of two maneuvering areas, widening entrance into Port Elizabeth and Port Newark branch channels, deepening and widening Newark Bay 32-foot channel and provision of a turning basin at junction of Hackensack and Passaic Rivers; and deepening 12-foot channel in Hackensack River to 15 fet. NEW YORK HARBOR AND ADJACENT CHANNELS (PORT JERSEY), NJ (See Section 11 of Text) Deepening existing 35 foot channel and turning basin. 2-28 H. Doc.494, 89th Cong. 2nd sess. PL 99-662 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT March 14, 1915 July 3, 1930 December 31, 1970 March 7, 1974 July 5, 1884 March 3, 1899 June 25, 1910 August 8, 1917 August 8. 1917 August 8, 1917 August 30, 1935 August 30, 1935 August 26, 1937 July 3, 1958 October 27, 1965 March 31, 1982 September 6, 1933 August 30, 1965 May 28, 1935 May 17, 1950 October 27, 1965 NEW YORK HARBOR COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT (See Section 12 of Text) Allotment from appropriations made for New York Harbor and its immediate tributaries may be used for collection and removal of drift in these waterways. Carrying on this work as a separate and distinct project. Increase scope of project to include removal and disposal of derelict vessels, some deteriorated shore structures and debris along shores; and the repair of other shore structures; all subject to approval by Secretary of the Army and the President. Removal and disposal of derelict vessels, some deteriorated shore Structures and debris along shores and the repair of other shore Structures. NEW YORK HARBOR, ENTRANCE CHANNELS AND ANCHORAGE AREAS (See Section 13 of Text) Main-Ship-Bayside-Gedney to 30 feet deep for width of 1,000 feet (Dimensions fixed by Secretary of War, December 27, 1886 by authority of Act of August 5, 1886). Ambrose Channel (East Channel). Maintenance of entrance channel under I head. Anchorage Channel, extension of Ambrose Channel into Upper Bay. Removal of Craven Shoal Channel between Staten Island and Hoffman and Swinburne Islands Dredging south end of Red Hook Flats, Liberty Island Anchorage, and channel along New Jersey pierhead line. Deepen Bayside-Gedney Channel to 35 feet for a width of 800 feet. P.L. 91-611, 91 st Cong., H.R. 1987 P.L. 93-251, 93rd Cong. Annual Reports 1887 p. 62 and 1888, p. 63 H. Doc- 159, 55th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc- 518, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 557, 64th Cong., I st sess. H. Doc. 625, 64th Cong 1st sess. H. Doc. 183, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 133, 74th Cong. 1st sess. Deepen Ambrose and Anchorage Channels to 45 feet for a width of 2,000 feet. Senate Commerce Doc. 75th Cong, 1st sess. Dredging South Channel, Elimination of portion of Bayside-Gedney Channel S. Doc. 45, 84th Cong. 1st sess. Deepen and expand Red Hook Flats Anchorage. Deepen Gravesend Bay Anchorage Further expansion of Red Hook Flats Anchorage and the relocation of Anchorage channel. NEW YORK AND JERSEY CHANNELS (See Section 14 of Text) Anchorage off Peth Amboy to 35 feet Channels 35 feet deep from lower bay to upper bay, except between vicinity of Smith Creek and vicinity of Piles Creek to 30 feet with anchorage 38 feet deep at Sandy Hook and Perth Amboy. Channel 35 feet deep from vicinity of Smith Creek to vicinity of Piles Creek. Widen entrance to Kill Van Kull to 1,400 feet narrowing to a minimum width of 1,000 feet. 2-29 S. Doc. 17, 89th Cong. 1st sess. OCE Letter 31 Mar. 1982. H. Doc. 1387, 62nd Cong., Doc. 17, 71st. Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 133, 74th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 233, 81st Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 108, 98th Cong. 1st sess. June 10, 1872 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 27, 1965 July 14, 1960 Aug. 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 RONDOUT HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 15 of Text) Parallel dikes, branch dike, and entrance channel, 14 feet deep. S. Ex. Doc. 35, 42nd Cong., 2nd sess. Annual Report 1872, p. 810 Extension of 14-foot channel and for 12-foot channel Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 17, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. Extend 12-foot channel from mile 1.8 to 3.5 H. Doc. 288, 89th Cong, 1st sess.. (contains latest published map) SHINNECOCK INLET, N.Y. (See Section 16 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide in Inlet, and 6 feet deep H. Doc. 126, 86th Cong., and 100 feet wide in the Bay, and 2 jetties. 1st sess. FY 83 Supplemental Appropriations Act SHOAL HARBOR AND COMPTON CREEK, N.J. (See Section 17 of Text) 8-foot channel from the first bend in the creek to Main St. Bridge. H. Doc. 58, 73rd Cong. 1st sess. Extension of 8-foot channel to 1,000 feet upstream from Main St. Bridge. H. Doc. 673, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 12-foot channel in bay to the first bend in the creek. H. Doc. 89, 82nd Cong., 1st sess. ATLANTIC COAST OF LONG ISLAND, JONES INLET TO EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, LONG BEACH ISLAND, N.Y. (See Section 22 of Text) Oct. 1, 1986 1974 & 1986 Water Resources Development Acts 1960 River & Harbor Act 1974 Water Resources Development Act Storm damage protection, rehabilitation of existing groins and construction of new groins. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET TO ROCKA WAY INLET AND JAMAICA BAY, N.Y. (See Section 23 of Text) Beach nourishment of 100 to 200 foot wide beach at elevation 10 feet MSL FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, N.Y (See Section 24 of Text) Raising dunes, widening beaches, interior drainage structures, groins beach replenishment, annual nourishment. Project modified to provide that non-Federal interst shall contribute 30 percent of first costs. Section 101 (a) 21 of WRDA 1996 H. Doc. 425 86th Cong., 2nd sess. P.L. 93-251, 93rd Cong., H.R. 10203 1986 and 1992 Water Resources Development Acts Oct. 12, 1962 RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK, N.J. (See Section 25 of Text) This project provides for beach fill, groins, and levees for various Flood Control Act of 1962 sections of the study area. H. Doc. 464, 86th Cong., 2nd sess. The study seeks to determine the advisability of changes to the recommendation. 1986 Water Resources Development Act Section 501 Section 506 of WRDA 1996 ROCKAWAY INLET TO NORTON POINT (CONEY ISLAND) N.Y. (See Section 26 of Text) Provide beach fill to public beach to furnish storm damage protection to the area. Extension of terminal groins at W. 37 St. and Brighton Beach Fillet of beach fill at Sea Gate. 2-30 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT July 3. 1958 1988 Water Resources Development Act February, 1996 November 28, 1990 1962 Flood Control Act 1990 Water Resources Development Act April, 1997 SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, N.J. (See Section 27 of Text) Restoration of beach to minimum width of 100 feet at height of H. Doc. .332, 85th Cong., 2nd sess., 10 feet above mlw, and construction of 23 new groins and modified by Appr. Act for Energy extension of 14 existing groins. & Water Dev.for FY '85 HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS, N.J. (See Section 30 of Text) Tide gate improvements to control flooding in the Berry's Creek damage WRDA of 1992, sect. 324 basin, the mitigation enhancement and acquisition of wetlands, the Amended by WRDA of 1996 development and implementation of a system to provide for water sect. 550 quality monitoring and wetland monitoring, storm water management and watershed clean-up. JOSEPH G. MINISH PASSAIC RIVER WATERFRONT PARK AND HISTORIC AREAS, NJ. (See Section 31 of Text) The first phase restores riverbanks and wetlands. The second phase WRDA 1990; PL 101-640 adds 9,200 foot waterfront walkway and third phase adds park WRDA 1992; PL 101-580 facilities, plazas and landscaping. WRDA 1996; PL 104-303 NORTH ELLENVILLE, N.Y. (See Section 32 of Text) Levees and floodwalls, removing concrete dam, stream diversion, S. Doc. 113, 87th Cong., interior drainage structures. Subsequent damage repairs. 2d sess. PL-84-99 NEW YORK CITY WATERSHED, N.Y. (See Section 33 of Text) Provide design and construction assistance for water-related environmental infrastructure and resource protection. WRDA 1996, sect. 552 CR52, HR. 36 1976, 1990 & 1992 Water Resource Dev. Acts October 22, 1976 October 22, 1976 March 16, 1981 February, 1984 PASSAIC RIVER BASIN, N.J. (See Section 34 of Text) Advanced engineering and design study, involving reformulation of plans for flood control and water resource management. PRESERVATION OF NATURAL FLOOD STORAGE PASSAIC RIVER, N.J. (See Section 35 of Text) The preservation element includes acquisitions 5,350 acres of natural storage area, 5,200 acres of which are wetlands and could conceivably be developed. RAMAPO AT OAKLAND, N.J. (See Section 36 of Text) Phase I Advanced Engineering and Design Study was authorized. Congressional guidance for the conduct of the study. The study was authorized for construction. RARITAN RIVER BASIN, GREENBROOK SUB-BASIN, N.J. (See Section 37 of Text) Recommended 150 year flood protection in lower portion. Recommended protection to 500 year level. Authorizes construction of Greenbrook Flood Control. Flood control combines levees, flood walls, channel modification, flood proofing, and natural flood storage to provide protection. H. Rpt. 94 -1702 WRDA of 1976; PL 94-587 WRDA of 1990 WRDA of 199 WRDA of 1976; PL 94-587 WRDA of 1986; PL 99-662 WRDA of 1996; PL 104-303 WRDA 1986, sect. 401(a) 2-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. FEATURES OF LOCK AND DAM INCLUDED IN EXISTING PROJECT (Section 6 of Text) Location: Below Waterford Above Battery, New York City Locks: Clear Width Greatest length available for full width Lift at lowest stages Depth on miter sills: Upper (at normal pool level) Lower (at lowest low water) Character of foundation: Rock Kind of dam: Fixed Crest Type of construction: Concrete Complete: 1917 Cost $1,463,014 SUPERVISOR OF NEW YORK HARBOR (Section 19 of Text) STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES-FY 1998 1. Number of Patrols a. Shore b. Vessel c. Air (helicopter) 2. Number of Inspections a. Shore Facilities b. Vessels 3. Disposition of Cases a. Voluntary Restoration b. After-the-fact Permit Applications Accepted c. Permit not required or already under permit d. Submitted for litigation to OCE or US Attorney e. Other misc. f. Cases pending as of October 1, 1997 2-32 TABLE 2-C 2.2 miles 152.6 miles 44.4 feet 492.5 feet 17.3 feet 16.3 feet 13.0 feet TABLE 2-E 94 181 0 275 140 124 264 36 11 46 0 64 135 292 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT TABLE 2-F RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS FY 1998 NAME OF PROJECT DATE SURVEY CONDUCTED NEW JERSEY H ackensack R iver ... ................ .. .................................................................. .......... ............. 12-13 Ma rch 98 H ackensack River .... .... ........... ..................................... ............................................. ........... 22-24 Sept. 98 Kill Van Kull ....... ........................ ...................................... ...................................... .. .........Dec. 97 - Feb. 98 Newark Bay Hackensack & Passaic River ....................................... 26 Feb - 1Mar. 98, Apr. 98, May 98, Oct. 98 Passaic River ...................................................................... Apr. 98, 24 Sept. 98 Raritan River ........................................... .7 Nov. - 13 Feb. 98 Sandy Hook @ Leonardo ............................................................... ............ Mar. 98 Sandy H ook B ay .................................................................................................................................. ........ M ar. 98 Shoal Harbor & Compton Creek........................................... ........................ Oct. 97 Shrew sbury R iver ........................................ ..................................................................... ........ O ct. 97 NEW YORK Arthur Kill .............................................................. ...19-25 Feb. 98 Browns Creek...... ................................................................................. Mar. 98 B ronx R iver.. .................... ............................................................ Feb. 98 Coney Island Channel ... ............................................. ......Apr. 98 East Chester................. ...... ...................................................................... Feb. 98 E ast R iver .... ...... ................................................................. .................................. .......................... .... Jan. 98 Fire Island Jetty ............ ......... ....................................... 20 Feb - 18 March 98 Flushing Bay & Creek .............................................................................. ..... Oct. 97 - Apr. 98 Glen Cove Creek ..................................................................................................................... Mar. 98 Great South Bay .............................................. ..................................................... M ar. 98 Hudson River Channel ............................................... Mar. 98 - Apr. 98 Huntington Harbor ................................................ .. ...................M ar. 98 Jamaica Bay ............... ....... .......................................................... .....O...ct. 97 Jones Inlet .................... ........................................................................................... M ar. 98, A pr. 98 L ake M ontauk ......................... ...................................................... .............................................. . .......... A pr. 98 Long Island Intracoastal W /W ............................. ............................................................................................. D ec. 97 Mamaroneck Harbor ............................................ 26 Aug. - 10 Sept. 98, Oct. 97 M ilton H arbor ................................................... ....... ..... ........................................ A pr. 98 New York Harbor ......................................... Oct. 96, Dec. 96, Jan. 97, Feb. 97, Jun. 98 New York & New Jersey .......................................................... ........ Dec. 97 Patchogue River ...................... .... ..................................... .. ....................................... 97 Peconic River ............. ........ ........................................................ .. Apr. 98 Red Hook Flats Anchorage ....................... ...................... 18 Sept. 96 - 8 Oct. 98 Sandy H ook C hannel ............... .............................................................................. 16 O ct. - 10 D ec. 98 Shark River ................ ..... ........................................................................ Apr. 98 Westchester Creek..................................................Feb. 98 Total cost of Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys in Fiscal Year 1998 was $2,333,621.33. 2-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Annual Projects Report For Bay Ridge-Red Hook Channels, NY Bronx River, NY Browns Creek, NY Burlington Harbor, VT Channel between North & South Hero Islands, VT Cheesequake Creek, NJ Coney Island Channel, NY Coney Island Creek, NY East River, NY East Rockaway Inlet, NY Echo Bay Harbor, NY Fire Island Inlet, NY Flushing Bay & Creek, NY Gordon's Landing, VT Gowanus Creek Channel, NY Great Chazy River, NY Great Kills Harbor, NY Great Lakes to Hudson River W/W, NY Greenport Harbor, NY Harlem River, NY Hempstead Harbor, NY Hudson River Channel, NY Huntington Harbor, NY Keyport Hatbor, NJ Lake Montauk, NY Larchmont Harbor, NY Little Neck Bay, NY Mamaroreck Harbor, NY Matawan Creek, NJ Mattituck Harbor, NY Milton Harbor, NY Newtown Creek, NY New Rochelle Harbor, NY New York State Barge Canal, NY Northport Harbor, NY Peconic River, NY Peekskill Harbor, NY Plattsburgh Harbor, NY Port Chester Harbor, NY Port Henry Harbor, NY Port Jefferson Harbor, NY Raritan River, NJ Raritan River to Arthur Kill Cut-Off Channel, NJ 1992 1991 1995 1966 1909 1953 1973 1952 1997 1997 1953 1973 1997 1982 1972 1980 1962 1976 1953 1969 1993 1997 1953 1990 1991 1970 1969 1990 1984 1990 1984 1986 1971 1988 1956 1953 1951 1986 1990 1931 1977 1991 1991 Cost to Sept 30, 1998 Operation & Construction Maintenance $5,523,297 1,149,946 33,976 12 706,414 9 31,000 40,000 111,371 69,489 32,723,662 13 83,969 64,584 594,355 2,102,905 34,750 346,831 18,000 137,301 ' 33,562,640 20 74,681 3,616,119 3,687,949 6,771,870 91,081 17 40,475 791,680 76,065 1,741,210 19 513,764 21,000 177,925 151,373 1,168,354 73,214 8 78,644 25,000 19,400 198,415 433,470 6 69,406 25 221,128 31 1,551,470 810,500 41,200,035 3,802,517 1,072,040 303,555 1,288 210,675 423,148 6,203 8,255,184 16,624,362 21,571 2,908,786 8,878,900 115 394,004 292,919 88,029 457 21,720 493,491 76,497 37,136,037 57,527 1,417,437 1,288,163 267,768 537 1,351,086 315,613 1,417,832 1,057,26 1,760,745 212,411 61,487 116,500 66,037 256,415 1,742,097 1,299 359,294 16,114,463 3,965,631 2-34 TABLE 2-G NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT TABLE 2-G OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sept 30, 1998 Projects Rondout Harbor NY Rouses Point, Lake Champlain, N.Y. Sag Harbor, NY Sandy Hook Bay, NJ Sandy Hook Bay @ Leonardo, NJ St. Albans Harbor, Lake Champlain, VT Saugerties Harbor, NY Shark River, NJ Sheepshead Bay. NY Shoal Harbor & Compton Creek, NJ Staten Island.Rapid Transit Railway Bridge, Arthur Kill, NY Sumpawanus (Babylon Creek) Inlet, NY Wallabout Channel, NY Wappinger Creek, NY Washington Canal and South River, NJ Woodbridge Creek, NJ 1. Excludes $104,800 for new work expended from contributed funds. 2. Includes $1,836,400 for new work for previous projects. Excludes $285,600 expended from contributed funds. 3. Includes $496,250 for new work for previous projects and $122,051 from public works funds. 4. Excludes $1,822,530 for new work expended from contributed funds. 6. Includes $16,369 for maintenance for previous projects. 7. Includes $17,000 for new work for previous projects. 8. Includes $43,175 for new work for previous projects. 9. Includes cost of maintenance prior to July 1, 1886. Excludes $1,415,133 for rehabilitation. 10. Includes $169,700 for maintenance for previous projects. 12. Includes $69,036 for new work and $26,921 for maintenance for previous projects. Excludes $10,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 13. Includes $6,187,690 for new work and $37,664 for maintenance for previous projects. 14. Excludes $104,805 for new work expended from contributed funds. For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1989 1895 1964 1985 1991 1917 1988 1987 1948 1990 1973 1895 1953 1950 1953 1953 Construction 142,437 98,468 121,805 26 508,936 56,479 3,125 81,905 18 150,000 33,828 124,572 7 7,730,476 7,000 18,174 13,000 206,116 30 48,823 Operation & Maintenance 3,185,437 249 11,710 4,002,330 679,916 385 429,180 1,254,813 64,078 1,822.938 10 36,312 44,691 212,827 178,398 15. Includes $111,419 for maintenance for previous projects and $64,560 expended from public works funds. 16. Includes $1,490,713 for maintenance for previous projects. 17. Excludes $19,546 for new work expended from contributed funds and $31,454 to be contributed. 19. Excludes $1,741,210 for new work expended from contributed funds. 20. Included $4,456,400 for new work expended from emergency relief funds. 23. Excludes $15,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 25. Excludes $1,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 26. Excludes $66,758 for rehabilitation. 28. Includes $15,000 for maintenance for previous projects. 30. Includes $84,934 for maintenance for previous projects. 31. Includes costs for new work $171,427 and maintenance $20,646 for previous projects. 2-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 2-H OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sept 30, 1998 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Projects Report For Construction Maintenance Atlantic.Coast of N.J., Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet 1 1959 Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, N.J. 1981 $11,061,256 262 Fire Island Inlet to Jones Inlet, N.Y. 2 1981 18,044,667 217,900 1. Reactivated as a modified project in 1985 (Sec. 21) 2. Listed since 1982 as a navigation and beach nourishment project (Sec. 4) TABLE 2-I OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sept 30, 1998 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Projects Report For Construction Maintenance Adams, Hossic River Basin, Mass. I Ardsley, NY Byram River at Pemberwick, Conn. 1,3 East Barre Dam, Winooski River, Vt. 1 Elizabeth, NJ Herkimer, NY Hoosic Falls, Hoosic River Basin. NY 1 Lamoille River, Vt.: Hardwich Dams 5, 6 Liberty State Park Levee and Seawall, NJ Missisquoi River at Richford, Vtl3 North Adams, Hoosic River Basin, Mass. Rahway. NJ Rahway. South Branch, NJ Rosendale, NY Sandburg, Creek. Spring Glen, NY Sawmill R. Elmsford & Greenburgh. NY South Amsterdam, Mohawk River. NY South Ellenville. NY South Orange, NJ Staten Island. NY Wappinger Creek at Pleasant Valley, NY 1-3 Waterbury Reservoir Winooski River Basin, Vt. Winooski River. Vt. Wrightsville Dam, Winooski River Basin, Vt. Yonkers, NY 1. Completed. 2. Excludes costs of $913,360 under other contributed funds. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong. as amended. 4. Inactive. 1964 1990 1959 1963 1985 1973 1956 1939 1990 1965 1968 1971 1979 1975 1976 1987 1967 1984 1981 1983 1959 1976 1940 1970 1984 6,282,307 2 5,447,281 363,515 2,898,334 54,374,070 1,249,530 9 1,064,626 17,888,670 238,169 15,572,988 7 973,142 8 15,863,723 3,684,966 109,702 62,917 1,564,976 289,702 6,857,484 644,998 142,075 1,438,845 5,897,427 1,549,929 113,754,475 10 8,200 5. Includes $213,507 emergency relief funds. 7. Excludes cost of $21,000 under other contributed funds. 8. 9. 10. Excludes cost of $51,500 under other contributed funds. Uncompleted portion has been deauthorized. Includes $622,817 contributed funds. 2-36 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT TABLE 2-J SURVEYS Study Class FY 98 Cost Navigation Studies $1,490,420 Flood Control Studies 910,921 Beach Erosion Studies 2,677,186 Special Studies 1 148,351 TOTAL 5,226,878 1. Includes watershed/ecosystems, special investigations, FERC licensing activities, Intra Army water resources, Nat'l Estuary studies, Marine Fisheries Service, Planning Ass't to States, Coord. studies of other agencies. TABLE 2-K PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Authorized Projects FY 98 Cost Navigation Arthur Kill Channel - Howland Hook Terminal, NY & NJ $827,369 Beach Erosion Long Beach Island, NY $62,568 Flood Control Green Brook Sub-Basin, NJ $148,517 Lower Saddle River, NJ 7,048 Passaic River Mainstem, NJ 6,976 Passaic River Mainstem 136,616 Preservation of Natural Flood Storage Areas, NJ Ramapo and Mahwah Rivers, NJ -5,640 Sawmill River at Elmsford, NY 570 TOTAL 1,184,024 TABLE 2-L COSTS FOR FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES Study Class FY 98 Cost Flood Plain Technical Services $41,048 Flood Plain Management Unit 35,366 Bixby, NY 160 Haysville, NY 2,812 Shawnee, VT 4,700 Quick Response 7,188 Bryant Park, VT 39,603 Searcy Park, NY 28,684 Taylor Loop Creeks, NY 7,500 TOTAL 167,061 2-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 2-M DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Annual Projects Report For Date And Authority Federal Funds Expended Construction Operation and Maintenance Bennington, VT (1936 & 41 Acts) Bronx River, N.Y. Brown's Creek, N.Y. Cheesequake Creek, N.J. 4 Coney Island Creek, N.Y. 4-6 East Chester Creek, N.Y. (1950 Act) East Rockaway (Debs) Inlet, N.Y. 4 East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Part 11) Elizabeth, N.J. Glen Cove Harbor, N.Y. Hempstead Harbor, NY (68-Act) 14 Hudson River, NYC to Albany (12 Ft, 27 Ft)18 Huntington Harbor, N.Y. Irvington Harbor, N.Y. Lamoille River, VT Lemon Creek, NY Manhasset Bay, NY Matawan Creek, NJ (1881 Act) N. Shore of Long Island, Suffolk County, NY Newark Bay, Hackensack and Passaic River, N.J. 16 N.Y. & N.J. Channels 4, 18 Orowoc Creek, NY. Otter Creek, VT Perth Amboy, N.J. Port Chester Harbor, N.Y. 2, 3 Port Jefferson Hbr. N.Y. (1890, 1930 & 68 Acts) Rahway River, N.J. 6, 7 Raritan River, N.J. 4, 6 Rome Mohawk River, N.Y. 6, 7 Rutland, Otter Creek, VT Sag Harbor, N.Y. (Channel) 1 Shooters Island, N.J. & N.Y. 9 Shrewsbury River, N.J. (1950 & 1965 Act) Swanton Harbor, VT 6 Ticonderoga River, N.Y. 1-6 Waterbury, VT (1941 Act) 7, 8 Waterford. N.Y. 6, 7 Waycake Creek, NJ Westchester Creek, N.Y. 4 12 8 670,000 1,159,946 33,976 40,000 69,489 100,000 1,185,365 1974 1981 1980 1953 1952 1992 1963 1976 1948 1966 1989 1982 1953 1947 1939 1937 1948 1984 1979 1982 1982 1949 1937 1966 1967 1977 1948 1981 1959 1963 1964 1992 1888 1895 1951 1939 1949 1981 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1977 Aug. 1982 Aug.1982 Jul 1992 Aug. 1977 1988 Aug.1977 Aug. 1977 Jan 1990 Aug. 1987 Aug. 1977 Aug. 1977 Aug. 1977 1988 1988 1988 Jan 1990 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1982 1988 Jan 1990 Jan 1990 Aug. 1977 Jan. 1990 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1982 1988 Oct. 1992 Jul 1992 Jan 1990 Aug. 1977 Nov. 1983 Nov. 1981 Aug. 1982 1988 Aug. 1982 1,149,946 33,976 40,000 69,489 3,503,969 13 60 ,481 165,882 49,035 49,837 433,470 1,551,470 7,000 167,760 9,253 175,933 307 10,113,903 1,947,853 505,369 30,675 1,622 59,391 2,455 76,497 51,566 1,621 4,636 257,237 60,481 165,882 4-11 39,468 68,581 4,5 49,837 6,621 21,000 433,470 4 4,951 441,656 4 15 37,000 1,617,470 7,000 211,015 70,500 16,500 9,253 2,781 175,933 235 1,260 2,921,311 2-38 i .. NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. Deepening 8 foot project to 10 feet. Includes $93,882 for Rehabilitation. Includes $10,000 expended from contributed funds. Includes $100,000 expended from contributed funds. No Commerce reported. Completed. A portion of this project is classified "inactive." Uncomplete portion deauthorized. Excludes $19,546 for new work expended contributed funds. Inactive. Entire project deauthorized. Excludes $71,423 for rehabilitation. Removal for navigation. TABLE 2-N SECTION 107 Project FY 98 Cost CONTINUE COORDINATING FEASIBILITY STUDY Belford Harbor, N.J. $4,468 Coordination Account 2,543 TABLE 2-0 SECTION 103 Project FY 98 Cost PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Shelter Island, NY $21,693 CONSTRUCTION FUNDING Asharoken Village, Northport, NY 2,468 Oakwood Beach, Staten Island, NY 65,012 Shelter Island, NY 100,000 Rikes Island, East River, NY 3,116 TABLE 2-P SECTION 205 Project FEASIBILITY STUDY Lamoille River, VT Missisquoi, VT Poplar Brook, Monmouth Cty., NJ Fulmer Creek, Village of Mohawk, Herkimer Cty., NY Moyer Creek, Village of Frankfort, Herlimer Cty., NY Steele Creek, Village of Ilion, Herkimer Cty., NY PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Sauquoit Creek, Whitesboro, NY Elizabeth River, Hillside, NJ Mill Brook, Highland Park, NJ Coordination Account 2-39 14. Deepening project to 13 feet. 15. Includes $66,000 expended from contributed funds. 16. 1912 authorization. 17. 1935 authorization. 18. 1910 construction dikes. FY 98 Cost $2,851 2,352 135,100 5,814 7,713 10,164 $314,487 62,203 13,197 11,407 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 2-Q SECTION 14 Project FY 98 Cost PLANNING AND DESIGN ANALYSIS Wallkill River, Rosendale, NY $20,143 Coordination Account 10,979 TABLE 2-R SECTION 206 Project FY 98 Cost COORDINATION ACCOUNT $1,667 PRELIMINARY RESTORATION PLANS $2,710 TABLE 2-S SECTION 1135 Project FY 98 Cost COORDINATION ACCOUNT INITIAL APPRAISALS, GENERAL $4,540 $23,849 2-40 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT * This district comprises a portion of southeastern New York, eastern Pennsylvania, western and southern New Jersey, northern and southern Delaware, and a small Part of northeaster Maryland embraced in the drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean from Manasquan River, NJ inclusive, to south boundary of Delaware. It also includes Chesapeake and Delaware Canal and approach channel thereto in Chesapeake Bay and Elk River, MD. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Barnegat Inlet, NJ ........................................ 3-2 2. Chesapeake and Delaware Canal St. Georges Bridge Replacement, DE.....................3-2 3. Cedar Creek, DE......................................3-3 4. Cold Spring Inlet, NJ.......................................3-3 5. Delaware River between Philadelphia, PA and Trenton, NJ.............................3-3 6. Delaware River, PA, NJ, and DE Philadelphia to the Sea...................... 3-4 7. Indian River Inlet and Bay, DE................................3-5 8. Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay DE, MD... ......................... 3-5 9. Inland Waterway Rehoboth to Delaware Bay, DE........................................ 3-6 10. Manasquan River, NJ......................................3-7 11. Mispillon River ............................................. 3-8 12. Murderkill River, DE........................................3-8 13. New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway.......................3-8 14. Salem River, NJ ............................................ 3-9 15. Schuylkill River, PA...................................... 3-10 16. Tuckerton Creek...............................3-11 17. Wilmington Harbor, DE.................................3-11 Beach Erosion Control Page 18. Cape May Inlet to Lower Twp., NJ................... ...... 3-12 19. Delaware Coast Protection, DE.................................3-12 20. Great Egg Harbor Inlet and Peck Beach, NJ........ ..................................... 3-13 Flood Control Local Protection Page 21. Beltzville Lake, PA................................. ..... 3-13 22. Blue Marsh Lake, PA................................. ... 3-14 23. Emergency Bank Protection..................................3-14 25. Francis E. Walter Dam,PA.............. ....... 3-15 26. General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, PA............................................3-15 27. Glen Foerd, PA............................................3-15 28. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects...........................................3-16 29. Inspection of Non-Federal Levees............................3-16 30. Molly Ann's Brook, NJ...........................................3-16 31. National Emergency Preparedness ...................... 3-17 32. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ..................................................... ....3-17 33. Prompton Lake, PA..................................................3-17 34. Reconnaissance and Conditions Surveys.................3-18 35. South Central, Pennsylvania Environmental Improvement, PA .................... 3-18 36. Southeastern Pennsylvania, PA ....................... 3-18 General Investigations Page 37. Collection and Study of Basic Data..........................3-19 38. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design.................3-19 39. Surveys.............................. ................ 3-19 Tables TABLE 3-A TABLE 3-B TABLE 3-C TABLE 3-D TABLE 3-E TABLE 3-F Page Cost and Financial Statement......................3-20 Authorizing Legislation........ ....... 3-26 Other Authorized Navigation Projects......................................3-35 Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects........... ...3-37 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects..................................3-37 Deauthorized Projects..........................3-38 24. Flood Control Work Under Special A uthorization .......................................................... 3-14 * All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 3-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 1. BARNEGAT INLET, NJ Location: On the east coast of New Jersey about 50 miles south of Sandy Hook, between Island Beach on the north and Long Beach on the south (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Chart Nos. 825 and 1216). This inlet is the main entrance to Barnegat Bay, largest of the bays on New Jersey coast which are separated from the ocean by narrow barrier beaches. Previous Project: None Existing project: The existing project, adopted as HD 73-19 in 1935 and modified as HD 74-85 in 1937 and HD 79-358 in 1946, provides for a channel eight feet deep through the inlet and ten feet deep through the outer bar, protected by two converging stone jetties and a channel of suitable hydraulic characteristics extending in a northwesterly direction from the gorge in the inlet to Oyster Creek channel and through the latter channel to deep water in the bay. The project was modified in 1946 to provide for the maintenance of a channel eight feet deep and 200 feet wide to connect Barnegat Light Harbor with the main inlet channel. The project length is about 4.5 miles. (For details see page 203, Annual Report 1964.) The Supplemental Appropriation Act of 1985 contained language stating that the existing project has not worked as projected and, in fact, has created a hazard to navigation. As a result, the following administratively approved modifications were constructed as design deficiency correction measures: a new south jetty 4,270 feet in length along an alignment generally parallel to the existing north jetty, extending from the the old groin located near the Barnegat Lighthouse to the tip of the existing south jetty; a navigation channel 300 feet wide to a depth of 10 feet below mean low water from the outer bar in the Atlantic Ocean to the north end of the existing sand dike in Barnegat Bay; remove the shoal located between the north jetty and the proposed navigation channel; jetty sport fishing facilities on the new jetty. All dredged material from initial construction was placed on the shores of Barnegat Light between the existing and new south jetties, and is being stabilized by vegetation and sand fence. Dredged material from maintenance operations are placed on the down draft beaches, the area between the existing and new south jetties, or in other locations as determined by a shoreline monitoring program. Estimated cost for new work (October 1990) Federal share is $31,200,000 and non-Federal is $14,230,000. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1998.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with. A local cooperation agreement for the approved modification was executed on 19 May 1986 and a modification to the local cooperation agreement was executed on 20 March 1987. Terminal facilities: There are four docks or terminals in inner harbor at Barnegat Light which furnish adequate facilities for present commerce of locality. Operation during fiscal year: Maintenance: Beach monitoring and condition surveys was accomplished. Dredging by the U.S. Government Dredge Currituck, removed a total of 387,000 cubic yards of material at a total of $1,552,000. 2. CHESAPEAKE AND DELAWARE CANAL, ST. GEORGES BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, DE Location: The new St. Georges Bridge carries the new Delaware State Route 1 over the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal in New Castle County, Delaware and is located approximately 2,200 feet west of the existing St. Georges Bridge. Previous project: None. Existing project: This project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1990. It states that the project for navigation, Inland Waterway from the Delaware River to the Chesapeake Bay, Delaware and Maryland, authorized by the first section of the Act of August 30, 1935 (45 Stat. (030) and modified by the Act entailed an Act authorizing construction of a highway bridge across the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal at Saint Georges, Delaware, approved August 7, 1939 (53 Stat. 1240-1241) is modified to direct the Secretary to replace the highway bridge on United States Route 13 in the vicinity of St. Georges, Delaware, to meet current and projected traffic needs, at a Federal cost of$115,000,000. The bridge was officially opened to traffic in December 1995. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1998.) Local cooperation: The state will carry out the bridge replacement and the Secretary will reimburse the State for cost incurred. 3-2 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT Terminal facilities: None. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Work included supervision and administration and reimbursement to the State of Delaware for construction costs of St. Georges Bridge Replacement. 3. CEDAR CREEK, NJ Location: In the northeastern corner of Sussex County, DE, approximately five miles east of the Town of Milford. The area is accessible via State Route 36. Existing project: Cedar creek, with headwaters in Sussex County, meanders northward through coastal salt marsh to its terminus at Mispillion River. The creek currently ranges in depth from 13 feet below mean low water at the Route 36 bridge to less than 5 feet at several locations. The channel width varies from approximately 75 feet to 50 feet. Tidal range in the lower reaches of the creek is approximtely 4 feet. Existing project was adopted by the Chief of Engineeers, 10 December 1979 under the smll navigation program, section 107, River and Harbor Act of 1960. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1998.) Local Cooperation: Fully complied with. Terminal facilities: Five marinas are located along the lower stretch of the creek, with residential areas being situated near the Delaware Bay shore. The area is sparsely populated, and there are no major metropolitan areas nearby. Operation during fiscal year: Maintenance: Continuing dredging contract awarded in September 1998. Actual dredging commenced in October 1998. 4. COLD SPRING INLET, NJ Location: In Cape May County, southern New Jersey, about 3 miles east of Cape May City and about 16 miles northeast of Delaware breakwater. Inlet connects Cape May Harbor and New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway with the Atlantic Ocean and is about 1 mile long. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 234, 827 and 1219). Existing project: An entrance channel 25 feet deep and 400 feet wide, protected by two parallel jetties, and extending from the 25-foot depth curve in the Atlantic Ocean to a line 500 feet harborward of a line joining the inner ends of the jetties, thence 20 feet deep and 300 feet wide to deep water in Cape May Harbor. The total length of the section included in the project is about 2.25 miles. Extreme tidal range, due to ocean storms, is about 1 1 feet. Project was completed in 1942. (For details see page 238, Annual Report for 1962. See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1998.) Local cooperation: Complied with Act of 1907, except work of deepening and enlarging inner harbor which is 80 percent complete. Terminal facilities: See page 238 Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Dredging by the U.S. Government Side Casting Dredge Schweizer removed a total of 65,000 cubic yards of material at a total cost of $373,300. 5. DELAWARE RIVER BETWEEN PHILADELPHIA, PA AND TRENTON, NJ Location: Rises in southeastern New York, flows generally southerly 367 miles, forming boundary line between New York and New Jersey on the east and Pennsylvania and Delaware on the west, and empties into Delaware Bay. (See U.S. COAST and Geodetic Survey Charts 1218, 280, 294, 295, and 296.) Previous project: For details see page 1778 of annual report for 1915, page 311 of Annual Report for 1924, page 220 of Annual Report for 1934, and page 296, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: A channel from Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, 23.5 miles to upstream end of Newbold Island 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with suitable widening of bends, including relocation of channel at Delair Railroad bridge, and reconstruction of bridge, thence 5.5 miles to upper end of Trenton Marine Terminal, 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide, with a turning basin 800 feet wide and 1,700 feet long at the terminal; and maintenance of a channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide from upper end of 34-foot channel to Penn Central railroad Bridge at Trenton, dredged under a previous project. Project also provides for an auxiliary channel 20 feet deep and 200 feet wide east of Burlington Island, extending easterly from main channel to upper end of U.S. Pipe and Foundry Co.'s property at East Burlington, 3-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 with a turning basin 450 feet wide at upper end; for initial excavation, only, of a cross channel 8 feet deep and 200 feet wide through artificial island opposite Delanco, NJ, and for construction of such bank protection works as may be necessary. Section included in project is about 30.5 miles long, excluding auxiliary channel east of Burlington Island, which is 1.4 miles long, and cross channel opposite Delanco. Lower end is about 55 miles above river mouth at Liston Point and about 105 miles above Harbor of Refuge at mouth of Delaware Bay. Freshets, which occur usually during February and March, attain a height of 9 to 20 feet above mean low water in the vicinity of Trenton. Navigation is occasionally suspended during a portion of winter months due to ice. Existing project is 90 percent complete. A 40-foot channel under the 1954 modification from Allegheny Avenue to upper end of Newbold Island was completed April 1964. Work remaining is dredging from upper end of Newbold Island to Trenton Marine Terminal and widening turning basin at terminal which is in deferred category. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1998.) Local cooperation: Modification authorized by 1954 River and Harbor Act provides local interests must provide suitable terminal facilities, furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance, and hold the United States free from damages. Local interest complied with requirements, except city of Trenton has not provided suitable terminal facilities. Terminal facilities: There are 21 piers, wharves, and docks from Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, PA to Trenton, NJ facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details see Port Series No. 8 (revised 1966-Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Work included channel examination surveys. Dredging contract removed 465,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $3,628,100. 6. DELAWARE RIVER, PA, NJ, AND DE, PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA Location: See U.S. COAST and Geodetic Survey Charts 1218, 394, 295, and 280. Previous project: For details see page 1779 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 299, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: Provides for a channel from deep water in Delaware Bay to a point in the bay, near Ship John Light, 40 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide; thence to Philadelphia Naval Base, 40 feet deep and 800 feet wide, with 1,200-foot width at Bulkhead Bar and 1,000-foot width at other bends; thence to Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 40 feet deep and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend and 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide through Philadelphia Harbor, along west side of channel; and for anchorages at Reedy Point, Deepwater Point, Marcus Hook, and Mantua Creek, each 40 feet deep and 2,300 feet wide with respective length of 8,000, 5,200, 12,650, and 11,500 feet; anchorage at Gloucester 30 feet deep and about 3,500 feet long. Project also provides for construction of dikes and training works for regulation and control of tidal flow; for maintenance of an area on north side of channel opposite Philadelphia Naval Base between Shipway 3 and Schuylkill River to 40 feet deep and width of 150 feet on Mifflin Range and 200 feet on West Horseshoe Range; and for maintenance of any areas dredged by local interests to 35 feet deep between channel and a line 100 feet channelward of pierhead line between Point House wharf and Philadelphia Naval Base, when in opinion of Chief of Engineers such areas are so located as to be of benefit to generate navigation. Section included in project is about 96.5 miles long. All depths refer to plane of mean low water. Under influence of heavy and long-continued winds extreme tidal range is about 14 feet. Normal maximum velocity of tidal currents in the dredged channel varies between 2 and 3.5 miles per hour. Storm tides may increase maximum to as much as 4.5 miles per hour. Estimated cost for new work is $71,630,000 (July 1972) exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Channel to 37 deep and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend and 37 feet deep and 60 feet wide through Philadelphia Harbor along east side of channel and Port Richmond anchorage to 37 feet deep, except for that portion of channel which forms a part of 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide channel portion is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (July 1960) of this portion of project is $2,951,000. Existing project, excluding work deferred for restudy, is about 66 percent complete. The 40-foot channel from Naval Base to the sea was completed in 1942. Dredging Naval Base to Allegheny Avenue to 40 feet deep was completed in 1962. Enlarging anchorage at Marcus Hook was completed in 1967. Work remaining is to construct new anchorages at Reedy Point and Deepwater Point, and enlarge Mantua Creek anchorage, channel dredging from 35 to 37 feet deep over a width of 500 feet through Horseshoe Bend and about 600 feet through Philadelphia Harbor, and deepening Port Richmond Anchorage to 37 feet, all of 3-4 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT which have been deferred for restudy. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1998.) Local cooperation: Requirements under 1938 River and Harbor Act for maintaining channel and anchorage in Philadelphia Harbor annually by cities of Philadelphia and Camden were removed (see 1962 Annual Report for details.) Terminal facilities: There are 217 piers, wharves, and docks between Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia and the sea, 135 on the waterfront of Philadelphia, Camden, and Gloucester, and 82 below Philadelphia. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series Nos. 7, revised 1967, and 8, revised 1966-Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Routine maintenance of Government owned disposal areas and channel examination surveys. Work included dredging by the U.S. Government Dredge McFarland removing 340,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $2,125,400. Maintenance dredging also was accomplished by Norfolk Dredging Co. removing 2,450,591 cubic yards of material at a cost of $3,180,650. Accomplished cleanup of Penns Grove disposal area by contract costing $460,000. 7. INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DE Location: Indian River rises in Sussex County, DE, and flows easterly 13 miles into Indian River Bay which is a shallow lagoon 6 miles long and 2 miles wide on the Delaware Coast about midway between Cape Henlopen and the Maryland State line. The inlet is an opening through the barrier beach separating Indian River Bay and the Atlantic Ocean (See U.S. COAST and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1219.) Previous project: Adopted by River and Harbor Act of August 2, 1882. For further details see page 744, Annual Report for 1888. Existing project: This provides for the fixation of the inlet by the construction of two parallel jetties of steel-sheet pile and stone design extending to approximately the 14-foot depth curve in the ocean, and for dredging an entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide, for a distance of 7,000 feet inshore from the jetties; thence a channel 9 feet deep, 100 feet wide in the bay, and 80 feet wide in the river, to and including a turning basin 9 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at Old Landing; thence a channel 4 feet deep and 60 feet wide to the highway bridge at Millsboro. The project also provides that the interior channel dimensions may, at the discretion of the Chief of Engineers, be modified as found desirable to increase the hydraulic efficiency of the channel, without increasing the cost. The total length of the section included in the project is about 13.75 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range at the highway bridge is about 6 feet. Existing project was completed in 1951. For details see Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1998.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with except that local interest are required to furnish suitable areas for disposal of dredged material during maintenance as and when needed, and provide terminal facilities. Terminal facilities: There is a privately owned basin with berthing facilities for small boats located .75 miles west of the highway bridge near the inlet and .25 miles north of the inlet channel, connected therewith by a channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide; a U.S. Coast Guard wharf on the north side of the inlet channel in the same locality; and two wharves at Oak Orchard in Indian River Bay. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Work included plans and specifications for repair of North Jetty. 8. INLAND WATERWAY FROM DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DE, AND MD Location: The Waterway begins at Reedy Point on Delaware River, about 41 miles below Philadelphia, PA, and passes through the sea level Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, a distance of 14 miles, to Back Creek, at Chesapeake City, MD. It then passes for 5 miles down Back Creek, thence 9 miles down Elk River to Chesapeake Bay and thence 18 miles down Chesapeake Bay to a point near Pooles Island. A branch channel connects Delaware River at Delaware City, DE, with main channel at a point about 1.5 miles west of Reedy Point. (See U.S. COAST and Geodetic Survey Charts 294, 1226, 570, and 572.) 3-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Previous project: For details see Annual Report for 1934, page 242, and Annual Report for 1938, page 312. Existing project: A channel 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide from Delaware River through Elk River and Chesapeake Bay to water of natural 35-foot depth in Chesapeake Bay including a cutoff at Penn Central Railroad crossing, and having a maximum radius of curvature of 7,000 feet at bends; a high-level, fixed railroad bridge with vertical clearance of 135 feet and horizontal clearance of 600 feet at the railroad crossing over the cutoff (economic study of railroad crossing requested by Office of Management and Budget resulted in construction of a single track vertical lift bridge in lieu of a high-level fixed railroad bridge); high-level fixed highway bridges over canal at Reedy Point, St. Georges, Summit, and Chesapeake City; a bascule drawbridge across Delaware City Branch Channel; extension of entrance jetties at Reedy Point; and anchorage in Elk River, 35 feet deep and 1,200 feet wide, with an average length of 3,700 feet; enlargement of anchorage and mooring basin in Back Creek to afford an area about 400 feet wide, 1000 feet long, and 12 feet deep; dredging Delaware City Branch Channel to 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, and deepening existing basin to same depth; revetment of banks of canal as required between Delaware and Elk Rivers, and on banks of Delaware City Branch Channel east of Fifth Street Bridge; and construction of bulkheads. Total of section included in project, excluding Delaware City Branch Channel, which is about 2 miles long, is about 46 miles. All depths refer to plane of low water in Delaware River. Extreme tidal range is from 6.3 feet above mean high water to 3 feet below mean low water. High-level fixed highway bridges were completed at St. Georges (4-lane) in 1942; at Chesapeake City (2-lane) in 1949; and at Summit (4-lane) in 1960. Relocation of Penn Central Railroad bridge was completed December 21, 1965. Enlargement to 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide St. Georges and Summit bridges and Summit and Goose Island was completed on June 20, 1972 and February 18, 1972, respectively. Removing the old Penn Central railroad bridge was completed on January 21, 1972. Deepening of the Delaware City Branch Channel from 6 to 8 feet from a point 400 feet east of Fifth Street Bridge to its junction with the canal has been deferred for study. Original cost of canal including purchase was $10,709,755; estimated cost of new work for modifications of 1935 and 1954 is federal cost $166,000,000 (October 1992). This portion is deauthorized. Major Rehabilitation of St. Georges and Summit Bridges was completed in fiscal year 1991 at an approximate federal cost of $20,868,000 (90 price level). Portion of project comprising completion of Delaware City Branch Channel from a point 400 feet east of Fifth Street Bridge to its junction with canal is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing estimate. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1998.) Local cooperation: River and Harbor Act of 1954 provided that local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way required for bridges. Assurances accepted and approved February 16, 1955. Requirements for Summit and Reedy Point Bridges have been met. Terminal facilities: Ample mooring facilities at eastern and western ends of canal and bulkheads at Delaware City and St. Georges were constructed by the United States. A small-boat harbor was provided and a wharf constructed at Chesapeake City. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Work included general maintenance of traffic control television, dispatch service, operation of traffic, administration building, bridges, roadways, grounds, museum, auxiliary works, and periodic bridge inspection. Also included in work was maintenance night lighting, lease of equipment, surveys, environmental monitoring, electrical maintenance, property management, plans and specifications, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. There was also work on the Disposal Material Management Plan, Geographical Information System, Environmental Review Guide for Operations assessment, mosquito control, monitoring data, monitoring stabilization banks, and miscellaneous repairs. Other work included aerial photos, Delaware Fish and Wildlife Administration, installation of signs for St. Georges Bridge closing and a new radio system, and replacing office roof. There was also maintenance dredging by Weeks Marine Incorporated from October 27, 1997 to March 31, 1998 removing a total of 1,444,682 cubic yards of material at a total cost of $5,244,196. 9. INLAND WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DE Location: A tidal canal in southeasterly part of Sussex County, DE It extends 12 miles northward from Rehoboth Bay through high land west of town of Rehoboth to Gordon Lake; thence down Lewes River to 3-6 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT its junction with Broadkill River near its mouth. An entrance to the waterway from Delaware Bay is about 4 miles above Cape Henlopen. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 379, 1218, and 1219.) Previous project: A canal along a slightly different route formed a part of projected waterway from Chincoteague Bay, Va. to Delaware Bay, begun in 1886 and abandoned in 1905. Existing project: This provides for an entrance channel near Lewes 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide protected by two parallel jetties 500 feet apart; thence a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide to South Street Bridge at Lewes, and a basin of the same depth 1,200 feet long and up to 375 feet in width at the latter point; thence a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide (40 feet wide through Deep Cut near Rehoboth Bay) to Rehoboth Bay; a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the entrance to Broadkill River; two parallel rubble jetties 725 feet long at the Rehoboth Bay entrance; and the construction of the one highway bridge and one railroad Bridge to Rehoboth. The total length of the section included in the project is about 12 miles. The extension of the jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance is considered to be inactive and is excluded from the foregoing cost. The cost of the portion was last revised in 1960 and was estimated to be $816,000. Existing project is about 70 percent complete. For details on completed work see page 241 of Annual Report for 1963. Work remaining, extension of existing jetties at Delaware Bay entrance, is considered inactive. The Sheet Pile Jetty at the Delaware Bay entrance was removed during FY 1987. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1998.) Local cooperation: Complied with except local interest must furnish suitable terminal facilities and necessary spoil-disposal areas. Terminal facilities: See page 228, Annual Report 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Work included real estate management. Awarded continuing maintenance dredging contract in September 1998. Work began in October 1998. 10. MANASQUAN RIVER, NJ Location: This small stream flows in eastern part of New Jersey, rises near Freehold, flows easterly and empties into the Atlantic Ocean, about 26 miles south of Sandy Hook. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 795). Previous projects: For details see Annual Report for 1909, page 186, and Annual Report for 1938, page 269. Existing project: A channel 14 feet deep and 250 feet wide, protected by jetties and other works, extending from the Atlantic Ocean to inner end of north jetty, thence 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide to within 700 feet of New York and Long Branch Railroad bridge, thence of same depth and narrowing to 100 feet wide to within 300 feet of bridge; for a widening on northerly side of channel of 200 feet for 3,150 feet deep on south side of channel and for a 27.5-acre anchorage to 12 feet deep about 0.5 miles west of Route 35 highway bridge. Section included in project is about 1.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 3.7 feet at inner end of inlet and 4 feet at ocean end; mean range of spring tides, 4.4 and 4.8 feet, respectively, irregular fluctuations due to wind and barometric pressure vary from 2.7 feet below to 7.5 feet above mean low water at inner end of inlet. Project, excluding 10-and 12-foot anchorages, cost $518,243. Estimated cost (1958) for 10 and 12-foot anchorages portion of project considered inactive is $504,000. Restoration of bulkheads completed 16 August 1965 at a cost of $117,807. Existing project was completed in June 1963. Dredging 19-acre anchorage south of channel and 27.5-acre anchorage west of highway bridge is in the inactive category. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1998.) Local cooperation: River and Harbor Act of 1945 provides that local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances to date have been complied with. Terminal facilities: Five landings with a total wharfage of 700 feet used by commercial fishermen, and 7 landings and boat basins for pleasure craft. Existing facilities are considered adequate for present requirements. 3-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Work included supervision and administration and engineering and design on north and south jetty repairs, acquisition of right of way, Waterways Experiment Station inspection of locks, mapping and photography. 11. MISPILLION RIVER, DE Location: Rises in Kent County and Sussex Counties, DE, flows northeasterly 15 miles along the boundary line between the two counties and empties into Delaware Bay about 16 miles above Cape Henlopen. (See Coast and geodetic Survey Chart 1218.) Previous project: For details see page 1786, Annual Report for 1915, page 448 of Annual Report for 1918, and page 327 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: Project is about 31 percent complete. Four cutoffs for 6-foot channel were completed in 1923; 6-foot channel from Delaware Bay to Milford in 1924; and jetties at the mouth in 1939. Work remaining is dredging channel to 9-foot depth, 80 feet wide in Delaware Bay to the mouth, thence 60 feet wide to Milford with the provision of three cutoffs to eliminate bends, and a turning basin at Milford. Controlling depths at mean low water, in October 1964 from Delaware Bay to mouth 7.1 feet, and thence to fixed highway bridge at Report 1957, (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1998.) Local cooperation: Assurances required by 1954 River and Harbor Act have not been furnished. For details see page 243, Annual Report for 1957. Prior requirements fully complied with. Terminal facilities: For details see page 244, Annual Report for 1957. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Investigated condition of stone revetment. Awarded continuing maintenance dredging contract in September 1998. Work began in October 1998. 12. MURDERKILL RIVER, DE Location: Rises in Kent County, DE, flows northeasterly 19 miles through county, and empties into Delaware Bay about 25 miles above Cape Henlopen. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart no. 1218.) Existing project: Provides for a channel 7 feet deep at mean low water, 150 feet wide in Delaware Bay to mouth, and thence 80 feet wide to Frederica, 7.5 miles above mouth. Total length of section included in project is about 8.5 miles. Extreme tidal range is from about I foot below mean low water to about 2 feet above mean high water. Estimated cost for new work revised in 1954 is $38,000. Portion comprising widening channel to project width throughout its length is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost of this portion last revised in 1954 was $86,000. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of July 13, 1892 (H. Ex. Doc. 21, 52d Cong., 1st Sess. See page 981 Annual Report for 1892). Latest published map is in House Document 1058, 62d Congress 3rd Session. Existing project about 30 percent complete, including revision to be restudied. Channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide was completed in 1911. Work remaining is widening the channel to project width. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1998.) Local cooperation: None required. Terminal facilities: There are a number of light timber wharves on both sides of river near mouth and two wharves at Frederica, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Awarded continuing maintenance dredging contract in September 1998. Work began in October 1998. 13. NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY Location: A sea level inland water route approximately parallel with New Jersey coast, extends from Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, about 26 miles south of Sandy Hook, NJ to Delaware Bay about 3 miles above Cape May point. Waterway extends through inlet and up Manasquan River about 2 miles; thence by Point Pleasant Canal through high ground for 2 miles to head of Barnegat Bay. It then passes through a series of bays, lagoons, and thoroughfares along New Jersey coast to Cape May Harbor; thence across Cape May County to Delaware Bay through a land cut by way of New England Creek basin.(See U.S. COAST and Geodetic 3-8 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT Survey Charts, 234, 795, 825, 826, 827, 1216, 1217, 1218, and 1219.) Existing project: This provides for a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and generally 100 feet wide, extending from the Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, NJ to Delaware Bay above Cape May, NJ, by the further improvement of Manasquan River and Inlet, NJ, and the present New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway, and by the construction of a canal of similar dimensions from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay via the New England Creek basin, with adequate jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance. The total length of the project is about 117 miles. Normal tide range in sections of the waterway remote from inlets is 0.5 foot. Estimated cost for new work is $71,549 (July 1969), exclusive of $1,824,940 Navy Department funds and $99,000 contributed by local interests. Portion of project extending from Manasquan River to Cape May Harbor is to be restudied and excluded from new work costs estimate. Estimated cost of this portion is $6,470,000 (July 1954). Existing project was adopted by 1945 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc 133, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.) Latest published map is in project document. River and Harbor Act of 1946 (Public Law 525, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess., as extended by Public Law 240, 82d Cong.), authorized use for a period not to exceed 6 years, of funds from appropriations heretofore or hereafter made for maintenance and improvement of rivers and harbors, for maintenance of canal from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay constructed as an emergency wartime project with Navy Department funds, including cost of maintaining temporary railroad and seashore highway bridges over canal. Existing project is about 25 percent complete. A canal 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay was completed in 1942 as well as two parallel stone jetties at Delaware Bay entrances and a temporary highway and a railroad bridge in 1944, all with Navy Department funds. Work remaining consists of dredging a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet to Cape May Harbor, has been deferred for restudy; however, the project between Ottens Harbor and Richardson Channel and from that point to Cape May are being maintained to 10 feet and 12 feet, respectively, since they were originally dredged to these depths by the State. Section 860 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized, for preconstruction engineering and design, a 15 foot depth in the Vicinity of Cape May Harbor, titled as Cold Spring Inlet. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1998.) Local cooperation: The project is subject to the conditions that the State of New Jersey cede to the United States all right, title, and interest that it has acquired to lands, easements, rights-of-way, and structures other than bridges for the Bayhead-Manasquan Canal; that the State of New Jersey furnish, free of cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and disposal areas required for construction of the Cape May Canal and for improvement of the proposed waterway and for their subsequent maintenance; that local interests provide, maintain, and operate suitable bridges over the waterway; that the State of New Jersey donate to the United States the navigation aids in use on the present New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway; and that the State of New Jersey hold and save the United States and its agents free from any claims for damages resulting from the work of improvement. Compliance with these conditions was completed January 15, 1954, except that local interests are required to furnish disposal areas for the construction and the subsequent maintenance of the proposed improvements. Terminal facilities: See Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Work included general maintenance, surveys, and inspection of Point Pleasant Canal bulkhead. Maintenance dredging by Barnegat Bay Dredging Company removed 250,000 cubic yards of material at a total cost of $1,340,000. 14. SALEM RIVER, NJ Location: This river rises in Salem County, NJ, flows through the county westerly 13 miles, thence southerly 7 miles to the City of Salem, and thence westerly 3 miles, emptying into Delaware River about 45 miles below Philadelphia, PA. It is joined at Salem by Little Salem River, or Fenwick Creek, from the east. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 294.) Previous project: The River and Harbor Act of July 11, 1870, provided for a survey and the original project was adopted by River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1871, and modified in 1878, and a subsequent project adopted by River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1907. This project was further modified as HD 68-110 in 1925, providing an entrance channel from the Delaware River to the fixed highway bridge in Salem with dimensions and limits as 3-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 shown, including a cut-off and by the WRDA of 1986. The letter provided for channel widening and deepening; a turning basin; and wetland restoration. For further details see the Report of the Secretary of the Army dated 20 October 1994. Existing project: Provides a channel depth to 16 feet below mean low water between the Route 49 highway bridge and the Delaware River, a distance of about 5 miles. The channel is 150-250 feet wide and a trapezoidal shaped turning basin has a width of 495 feet and average length of 1000 feet. The project also contains 15.6 acres of wetland restoration to replace the loss of wetlands and shallow water habitat. The portion of the project comprising the deepening of Little Salem River to 12 feet is to be restudied and is excluded from the foregoing estimate. The estimated cost of this portion revised in 1953 is $28,000 excluding an equal amount to be contributed by local interests. The dredging for the existing project is completed. The dredging of the channel from Penns Neck Bridge to project dimensions, including the cutoff, was completed in 1928. The channel from Penns Neck Bridge to the fixed highway bridge in Little Salem River was dredged to a depth of 9 feet under a previous project. The work remaining to be done is the deepening of the channel in Little Salem River from 9 feet to 12 feet. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1998.) The controlling depths at mean low water were as follows: In January 1961, Delaware River to Penns Neck Highway Bridge 12.0 feet; and thence in December 1956 to the fixed highway bridge at Salem, 0.9 feet. The existing project was adopted by the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1925 (H. DOC. 110, 68th Cong. Ist Sess.) The latest published map is in this document. Section 859 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized a project depth of 20 feet. Local cooperation: The local cooperation agreement was executed on March 31, 1995 and requires that the Non-Federal sponsor provides cash in the amount of $779,000 and "other" (disposal area and associated costs) costs of $1,556,000 provide real estate and perform associated dredging. These requirements have been satisfied. Terminal facilities: There are 9 wharves on the river all at Salem, NJ. Eight wharves are privately owned and one is owned by the City. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: New work: Work included engineering and design, supervision and administration, wetland restoration and condition surveys. 15. SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA Location: Rises in Schuylkill County, PA, flows generally southeasterly 150 miles, and empties into Delaware River at Philadelphia, PA (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 295 and 280.) Previous project: For details see page 325, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project: This provides for a channel 33 feet deep and 400 feet wide in Delaware River the mouth and within the river to 29th Street, .75 mile above the mouth; thence the same depth and 300 feet wide to Passyunk Avenue Bridge, 3.5 miles above the mouth; thence 26 feet deep and 300 feet wide to Gibson Point, 4.5 miles above the mouth; and thence 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide to University Avenue Bridge, 6 miles above the mouth, including widening at bends. The total length of the section included in the project is about 6.5 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range, due to freshets and prolonged heavy winds, is about 14 feet. The cost for new work for the completed existing project was $7,440,000. Existing project was completed in September 1962. For details see Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1998.) Local cooperation: The River and Harbor Act of July 24, 1946, imposed the condition that the City of Philadelphia agree to remove 60,000 cubic yards, place measurement, of material annually from that portion of those portions of the project which the District Engineer may designate until such time as adequate municipal sewage-treatment works are constructed and placed in effective operation. Compliance with this condition has 3-10 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT been met through the completion of sewage-treatment works by the City of Philadelphia. All other requirements have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities: There are 38 wharves, piers, and docks within limits of improvement. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series No. 7, Revised 1967, Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Work included channel examination surveys and contract administration. Dredging contract removed 150,000 cubic yards at a cost of $1,300,000. 16. TUCKERTON CREEK, NJ Location: This creek rises in Ocean County, NJ flows southerly 7 miles, and empties into Little Egg Harbor about 8 miles north of Little Egg Inlet. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 825 and 1216.) Previous project: This provides for a channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide from the head of Marchelder Channel in Little Tuckerton Bay to the mouth; thence 75 feet wide to Parkers Landing, 1 mile above the mouth; thence 60 feet wide to West Tuckerton Landing, 1.75 miles above the mouth; thence a channel 5 feet deep and 60 feet wide to just above Scow Landing, 2 miles above the mouth; and thence a channel 3 feet deep and 40 feet wide to the Mill Dam at Tuckerton 2.25 miles above the mouth. The total length of the section included in the project is about 3.5 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. Then mean tidal range is 2.5 feet. The extreme tidal range is from about 1 foot below mean low water to about 1 foot above mean high water. Existing project: Completed in 1925. Local cooperation: None required. Terminal facilities: There are a number of wharves and piers of pile-and timber-construction along the creek. There are also four boatyards with marine railways, and repair and storage facilities located at Tuckerton. One wharf at Tuckerton is publicly owned. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Opertions during fiscal year: Maintenance: Work included contract administration. Maintenance dredging contract removed 30,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $535,000. 17. WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE Location: Formed by Christina River, which rises in New Castle County, DE, flows northeasterly 16 miles, passing through the City of Wilmington, DE, and empties into Delaware River about 29 miles below Philadelphia, PA (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 294.) Previous project: For details see page 1785 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 308 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: This provides for a channel 38 feet deep and 400 feet wide from west edge of Delaware River ship channel to Lobdell Canal, a distance of about 1.2 miles; thence 21 feet deep and 250 feet wide for the distance of .8 mile to the mouth of Brandywine River; thence the same depth and 200 feet wide for a distance of about 2.2 miles to a point approximately 4.2 miles from the Delaware River ship channel; thence decreasing to a depth of 10 feet in a distance of 750 feet to Penn Central Railroad bridge No. 4; and thence 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide for a distance of about 5.6 miles to Newport, DE, approximately 9.9 miles above Delaware River ship channel, including a turning basin 38 feet deep opposite the Wilmington Marine terminal and extending upstream from the mouth to Lobdell Canal, 320 feet wide, 2,900 feet long on the north side of the channel and decreasing to a length of 2,000 feet on the north side of the basin. It also provides for the removal of about 1,200 feet of the outer end of a stone-filled, pile-and-timber crib jetty constructed 2,150 feet long on the north side of the entrance; for a steel sheet-pile jetty 2,300 feet long, with 120-foot inshore wing, on the south side of the entrance, and for a V-shaped stone-filled pile-and-timber jetty at the mouth of Brandywine River 430 feet along the north side of Brandywine and 260 feet long on the Christina. Depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range, due to prolonged heavy winds, is about 13 feet. Existing project was completed in 1962. (For details see page 222, Annual Report 1962). Authority from Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of July 1960 provide for channel and turning basin deepening from 35 to 38 feet and the turning basin widened from 200 to 320 feet. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1998.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with. Terminal facilities: There are 18 piers, wharves, and docks within limits of the improvement. Facilities 3-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series No.8, revised 1966-Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Routine maintenance of disposal area, channel examination surveys, and contract administration. Completed FY 97 continuing dredging contract. Removed 300,000 cubic yards for $553,800. Completed second contract, removing 767,000 cubic yards for $697,700. Performed emergency dike raising for $240,000. Beach Erosion Control: 18. CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TWP., NJ Location: The project is located in Cape May County and extends along the beach front from the northern side of Cape May Inlet to the boundary of Lower Township, and Cape May City. Existing project: The plan, as presented in HD 94-641, was authorized for the Phase I Design Memorandum Stage of Advance Engineering and Design by Section 101a of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976, proposes the following features: breakwater on the updrift side of Cape May Inlet; beachfill from Cape May Inlet to Cape May Point; provision of a dune with sand fence and grass from Cape May Inlet to Wilmington Avenue; construction of two groins in Cape May City and seven groins in Lower Township; inclusion of all groins comprising the existing project; and periodic nourishment of the beaches and maintenance of the dune and dikes. The Phase I GDM, completed in August 1980 and approved by the Chief of Engineers in December 1981, determined that only beach erosion control measures in Cape May City are warranted. The plan proposed in that document consists of modifying the existing navigation project for Cape May Inlet to provide; a weir-breakwater at Cape May Inlet with construction being deferred pending demonstration of need; two new groins at Trenton and Baltimore Avenues in Cape May City; placement of beachfill between Cape May Inlet and the terminal groin at Third Avenue in Cape May City; maintenance of two new groins and existing groins in Cape May; periodic beach maintenance with material obtained from deposition basin on the northeast side of Cape May Inlet; and institution of a beach monitoring program in Lower Township area. Work for the initial beachfill was accomplished as follows; USGS feeder beach fiscal year 1989, Cape May City groin fiscal year 1990, and Beachfill Cape May City fiscal year 1991. Project estimate cost (October 1998) is Federal, $87,700,000, which includes $49,400,000 of Coast Guard contributions. Non-Federal costs are $9,700,000. The existing authority is for Phase I studies as provided by Section 101(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 in accordance with the provision of House Document 94-641. Continuation of planning and engineering for this proposed project was initiated in October 1977. The Phase I GDM was completed in August 1980 and approved by the Chief of Engineers in December 1981. Phase II AE&D studies were completed in July 1983. The project was authorized for separable elements under Section 501(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1998.) Local cooperation: The State of New Jersey furnished a letter of intent on 6 May 1981 regarding their willingness to comply with the above items of local cooperation. In addition, a draft Section 221 local cooperation agreement has been coordinated with letter of intent on May 31, 1983 regarding compliance with the items of local cooperation. Operations during fiscal year: New Work: Work included plans and specifications of beachfill, supervision and administration, hydraulic studies, engineering and design, and survey of the beach and sediment sampling. 19. DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION, DE Location: The project is located in Sussex County, Delaware, on the Atlantic Ocean and starts immediately south of Delaware Bay extending in a southerly direction a distance of 24.5 miles to Fenwick Island on the Delaware-Maryland border. Previous Project: The previous project, adopted as HD 85-216 in 1958 and modified by P.L. 87-874 in 1962, provided for Federal participation in the cost of restoration and subsequent periodic nourishment, and the 3-12 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT initial periodic nourishment was completed in 1957 by local interests. The second increment of beach replenishment by local interest was completed in 1963. Existing project: Provides a sand bypass system and periodic nourishment until 2021. (For details, see S. Doc. 90, 90th Cong. 2nd Sess.) Estimated cost of project (October 1998) is $25,700,000 of which $11,800,000 are federal costs and $13,900,000 are required non-Federal costs. The construction of the feeder beach north of Indian River Inlet was completed in 1973 and nourished in 1978, and 1984. Section 869 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 deauthorized the unscheduled portion of the project. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1998.) Local cooperation: Assurances of local cooperation were provided by the State of Delaware, January 13, 1981. Operations during fiscal year: New work: Work included supervision and administration, engineering and design, monitoring, and sand bypassing. 20. GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET & PECK BEACH, NJ Location: The project is located in Cape May and Atlantic Counties, New Jersey. Great Egg Harbor Inlet, an unimproved inlet, is about 1.1 miles wide at its narrowest point and provides a tidal connection between the Atlantic Ocean, Great Egg Harbor Bay, the New Jersey Intercoastal Waterway, and Great Egg Harbor River. Peck Beach is occupied in its entirety by the City of Ocean City and extends from Great Egg Harbor Inlet southward to Corson Inlet. The ocean frontage is about eight miles in length. Existing project: The project consists of providing initial beachfill, with subsequent periodic nourishment, with a minimum berm width of 100 feet at an elevation of 8 feet above mean low water. The beachfill extends from Surf Road southwest to 34th Street with a 1000 foot taper south of 34th Street. This plan required the initial placement of 6,200,000 cubic yards of material and subsequent periodic nourishment of approximately 1,100,000 cubic yards every three years. The material for the initial construction, and periodic nourishment is being taken from the ebb shoal area located approximately 5,000 feet offshore of the Great Egg Harbor Inlet. Additionally, the construction of the project required the extension of 38 storm drain pipes. All work is programmed. Estimated cost for new work (October 1998) Federal share is $359,000,000 and non-Federal is $193,000,000. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1998.) Local Cooperation: Federal participation in the proposed project is recommended and contingent on the local sponsor signing the Local Cooperation Agreement which identifies the required items of cooperation. In a letter dated 28 September 1990, the State of New Jersey identified a funding source for their costs and indicated that they were prepared to proceed with the final negotiations to sign the Local Cooperation Agreement as required by Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-611, 42 U.S.C. 196d-5b) and by the Water Resource Development ACT of 1986 (Public Law 99-662).The Local Cooperation agreement was executed in September 1991. Operations during fiscal year: New work: Work included engineering and design, hydraulic studies, supervision and administration, surveys of the beach, aerial photography, monitoring, and periodic nourishment. Flood Control: 21. BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA Location: Damsite is on Pohopoco Creek about 4.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Lehigh River and 4 miles east of Lehighton, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Map for Lehighton, PA-1960.) Existing project: This is a multiple-purpose development project providing water supply, flood control, and recreation. Plan of improvement provides for an earth and rock fill dam 4,200 feet long rising 170 feet above creekbed; a spillway around the north end of dam; and gate control outlet works discharging through a conduit on rock along right abutment. The lake, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, has a reservoir capacity of 68,250 acre-feet at spillway crest level with 1,390 acre-feet of inactive storage, 39,830 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 27,030 acre-feet for flood control. The cost of project was $22,931,400 including $6,100,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs 3-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 allocated to water supply storage during life of project. The construction of the dam and appurtenances was completed in 1971. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1998.) Local cooperation: Project was approved subject to certain requirements of cooperation by local interests as defined in approved House Document. Resolution of Delaware River Basin Commission providing assurances of repayment of water supply and pollution control costs was accepted June 7, 1965. A contract for repayment of water supply costs was signed October 16,1966. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 22. BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA Location: Dam site is on Tulpehocken Creek about 1.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Plum Creek and about 6 miles northwest of Reading, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Bernville, PA) Existing project: This is a multiple-purpose development project providing water supply, flood control, and recreation. Construction started in 1974 and was completed in 1980. The dam is 1,775 feet long and rises 98 feet above creekbed, with spillway about 1,500 feet south of dam, and gate-controlled outlet works discharging through a conduit on rock along right abutment. The lake, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, has a capacity of 50,010 acre-feet at spillway crest level, with 3,000 acre-feet of inactive storage, 14,620 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 32,390 acre-feet for flood control. (For details see H.Doc 533 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.) Cost of project $63,163,791. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1998.) (H. Doc. 533, 87th Cong., 2d Sess., contains latest published maps.) Local cooperation: Project was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as prescribed in House Document cited above. Delaware River Basin Commission on December 29, 1964, adopted a preliminary resolution providing for repayment of water supply costs. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 23. EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION Emergency Bank Protection Section 14, Public Law 79-526. Name of Project Cost to 30 Sept. 1998 Plans and Specifications Fort Mifflin, Phila., PA Sawkill Creek Bridge Dingman Township Section 14 Coordination Stoney Creek East Norriton, PA $30,233 $ 7,167 $13,658 $ 8,633 24. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Public Law 838, 80th Congress, (Preauthorization). Name of Project Section 205, as amended Cost to 30 Sept. 1998 Plans and Specifications Little Mill Creek, New Castle City, DE $138,756 Feasibility Reports Bock & Brock Creeks, Yardley, PA Naylor's Run, Cobbs Creek, PA North Branch Newton Creek, Woodlynne, NJ Section 205 Coordination Upper Mill Creek, Middletown, PA $$$ 71,062 3,051 1,347 $ 12,001 $ 40,461 Construction Delaware River, Port Jervis Palmerton, PA $4,790 $1,894,308 Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). 3-14 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT Fiscal year costs were $427,520 for disaster Fiscal year costs were $427,520 for disaster preparedness. 25. FRANCIS E. WALTER DAM, PA Location: Reservoir is in northeastern Pennsylvania on Lehigh River between White Haven and Stoddartsville. Dam is about 0.4 mile below mouth of Bear Creek, about 60 miles above confluence of Lehigh River and Delaware River at Easton, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Stoddartsville, PA). Existing project: Plan of improvement authorized by 1946 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 587, 79th Cong., 2d Sess.) provided for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. Modification of project, authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc.522, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.), provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present single-purpose flood control project. Plan of improvement requires altering spillway, increasing height of dam, constructing a new intake tower, extending outlet tunnel by addition of a concrete conduit, and constructing new dikes and raising existing dikes. Modified dam will rise 264 feet above riverbed and be 3,500 feet long. Reservoir modification, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, will have a reservoir capacity of 181,000 acre-feet spillway crest level with 3,000 acre-feet of inactive storage, 70,000 acre-feet for water supply and recreation and 108,000 acre-feet for flood control. Total cost is $186,000,000, estimated Federal cost of new work (October 1993) is $30,000,000 including $156,000,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Project as authorized under the 1946 Flood Control Act was completed June 1961. Settlement for lands was completed October 1962. The advance engineering and design for the modified project is completed. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1998.) Local cooperation: None required under 1946 Flood Control Act. Under 1962 Flood Control Act, project was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as defined in House Document 522 cited above. The Delaware River Basin Commission expressed its support by a resolution dated 23 April 1980 and reiterated its sponsorship for the modified project in August 1985, October 1985, and July 1988. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 25. GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA Location: In Dyberry Creek valley in central part of Wayne County, PA, between borough of Honesdale and village of Tanners Falls. Dam is about 3 miles above confluence of Dyberry Creek and Lackawaxen River in Honesdale and 29 miles above confluence of Lackawaxen and Delaware Rivers. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Honesdale, PA.) Existing project: A single-purpose flood control reservoir with a capacity of 24,500 acre-feet formed by an earth embankment, about 1,225 feet long at crest and rising 109 feet above creek bed. It also has a tunnel with intake structure and a chute-type spillway with a stilling basin in left abutment. Reservoir controls runoff from a drainage area of 65 square miles which is 91 percent of watershed of Dyberry Creek and 39 percent of Lackawaxen River watershed above Honesdale, PA. Construction of project was authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act (H.Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.). Project completed in June 1960. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1998.) Local cooperation: Assurances of Compliance with requirements of local cooperation were accepted July 30, 1956. For details see page 251, Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 27. GLEN FOERD, PA Location: The Glen Foerd estate is a National Register Historic Property located on the Delaware River at the confluence with the Poquessing Creek in the City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Previous project: None. Existing project: Since the construction of the historic property in the 1850's, the forces of the Delaware River and Poquessing Creek have caused a significant 3-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 deterioration of the 1,350-foot river wall on the perimeter of the property, including undermining of the foundation, settlement, loose and dislodged stones and loss of capstones. Significant sections of the wall have already collapsed. Without rehabilitation and restoration, erosive forces will continue to undermine the structural integrity of the river wall, leading to further weakening and collapse of additional sections of the wall, exposing the embankment and endangering other portions of this historic property. Construction of the project was authorized by Section 106 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-640). The project will restore the river wall consistent with the historic nature of the property. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1998.) Local cooperation: Local interests required to provide items of local cooperation consistent with the requirements of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The local sponsor is the City of Philadelphia, Fairmount Park Commission. Operations during fiscal year: New work: Work included engineering and design, and advertisement of construction contract. 28. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To ascertain whether local interests were maintaining and operating completed projects as required, inspections were made as follows: PROJECT INSPECTION Chester River, PA Delaware River, East Branch Delaware River, Port Jervis Lehigh River, Allentown, PA Lehigh River, Bethlehem, PA Pennypack Creek Rancocas Creek DATES December 1997 October 1997 May 1998 November 1997 May 1998 October 1997 October 1997 Local interests are satisfactorily maintaining and operating projects in accordance with regulation. Costs during the period were $39,033. 29. INSPECTION OF NON-FEDERAL LEVEES Inspection of non-federal levees were conducted at the following sites: PROJECT INSPECTION DATES Adams Hollow Run, Bristol, PA April 1998 Broad Dyke, New Castle, DE April 1998 Delaware River, Morrisville, PA April 1998 Jordan Creek, Allentown, PA April 1998 Lehigh River, Weissport, PA April 1998 Maris, Lukens, and Crozers Runs, April 1998 Upland, PA Tookany Creek, Cheltenham, PA April 1998 30. MOLLY ANN'S BROOK, NJ Location: Approximately 12 miles northwest of New York City, is located in Haledon, Prospect Park and Paterson, New Jersey along Molly Ann's Brook from the mouth below Totowa Avenue in Paterson upstream to Church Street in Haledon. Previous project: None. Existing project: The recommended plan modified the channel a total length of 2.5 miles. The channel includes both trapezoidal channel sections and walled sections. Five bridges will be replaced and one building will be removed. Estimated cost of project (October 1998) is $ 38,800,000 of which $20,600,000 are Federal costs and $18,200,000 are required non-Federal costs. Cost are in accordance with Section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act (Public Law 99-662), dated November 17, 1986. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing Project to Sept. 30, 1998.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on December 16, 1993. The State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy, the non-federal sponsor, provided a portion of their support thru the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. 3-16 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT Terminal facilities: None. Operations during fiscal year: New work: Work included plans and specifications, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. It also included the demolition of a cheese factory, surveys, utilities, channel improvement from Passaic River to Union Avenue, Union Avenue to Ryerson Avenue, Ryerson Avenue to Belmont Avenue, and from Belmont Avenue to Church Street. 31. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS The total fiscal year cost for this category amounted to $70,781. 32. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645. Name of Project Cost to 30 Sept. 1998 Plans and Specifications Wills Hole Thoro, Pt. Pleasant, NJ $53,100 Feasibility Gardners Basin, NJ Section 107 Coordination Account Wilmington Harbor, DE 33. $ 649 $10,325 $12,817 PROMPTON LAKE, PA Location: In Lackawaxen River Valley in central part of Wayne County, PA, between borough of Prompton and village of Aldenville. Dam is within corporate limits of Prompton, 4 miles upstream from Honesdale, PA, and approximately 30 miles above confluence of Lackawaxen and Delaware River. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Honesdale, PA) Existing project: Plan of improvement authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 113, 80th Cong., Ist Sess.) provides for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. Modification of project authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. DOC 522, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.) provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present single-purpose flood control project. Plan of improvement requires construction of control tower with gates and service bridge, placing an impervious blanket on valley walls and floor upstream from dam, widening spillway, and clearing land and relocating roads in reservoir. Dam, completed under 1948 Flood Control Act which will not be modified, is 1,230 feet long and rises 140 feet above riverbed. Existing spillway, cut into rock of right abutment, will be modified and present uncontrolled outlet works discharging into a concrete conduit along right bank, and will be provided with gates and a control tower. Reservoir modification, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River basin has a capacity of 52,000 acre-feet: 3,500 acre-feet for inactive storage, 28,200 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 20,300 acre-feet for flood control. Estimated Federal cost of new work (October 1994) is $3,510,000 including $54,990,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Project as authorized under the 1948 Flood Control Act was completed in November 1960. (For details, see page 358, Annual Report for 1963.) Work accomplished under the 1962 Flood Control Act was preconstruction engineering and design. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1998.) Local cooperation: Project modification was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as defined in House Document 522 cited above. Assurances of compliance under Flood Control Act of 1948 have been met. Delaware River Basin Commission on March 18, 1966, gave their view that the need for water supply was not urgent at that time. However recent studies conducted by DRBC have determined that there is now a need for water supply. In August 1983, DRBC expressed their strong support for the project modification. Preconstruction engineering and design was initiated in 1966, suspended in 1968 and again suspended in and resumed in 1986. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance at the project continued. Continued design memo on spillway efficiency. Performed testing on cleaning of relief wells. 3-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 34. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Reconnaissance Surveys Mantua Creek, NJ Rancocas Creek, NJ Schuylkill River (above Fairmount Dam), PA Schuylkill River (above Fairmount Dam), PA Condition Surveys Oyster Creek, NJ Oyster Creek, NJ Salem River, NJ Salem River, NJ Survey Conducted August 1998 July 1998 June 1998 July 1998 Survey Conducted May 1998 July 1998 July 1998 August 1998 35. SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT, PA Location: The south central Pennsylvania area includes twenty-one counties defined by the authorizing legislation. The program area within the Philadelphia District consists of Pike, Monroe, and Lackawanna Counties. Existing project: Section 313 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992, as amended, established a pilot program for providing environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in south central Pennsylvania. Such assistance may be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-related environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development projects, including projects for wastewater treatment and related facilities, water supply, storage treatment, distribution facilities, and surface water resource protection and development. The Federal share may be provided in the form of grants or reimbursements to the sponsor. FY 98 was the first year of funding for three project names in the Energy and Water Appropriations documents. Total project funds earmarked were $4,650,000 for work within Philadelphia Disrict. The House Report (105-190) provides $10,000,000 in design and construction assistance under the Section 313 Program for projects in Lackawanna, Lycoming, Susquehanna, Wyoming, Pike and Monroe Counties in Pennsylvania. The Conference Report (105- 271) specifies the funds among eight specific projects. Appropriations for those projects in the Philadelphia District are: Westfall Municipal Sewage Authority, Pike County $2,850,000; Jefferson Township, Lackawanna County $1,000,000; Township of Tobyhanna Sewer Authority, Monroe County $800,000. Local cooperation: The non-Federal sponsors are required to provide 25% of project costs including lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, replacement, repair and rehabilitation of the project after construction. Operations during fiscal year: New work: Municipal Authority of the Westfall Township, PA developed a project scope and design (partial cost reimbursement) agreement was begun. Jefferson Township, Lackawanna County, PA developed a project scope and design (partial cost reimbursement) agreement was begun. Tobyhanna Township, Monroe County, PA is in construction. 36. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA, PA Location: The East Central Incinerator property is located on Municipal North Piers 31 through 35 at 601 North Columbus Boulevard (at the intersection of North Columbus Boulevard and Spring Garden Street), in Philadelphia, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania. The Delaware River bounds the property on the north and east. The property is bounded to the south by the Delaware River and a parking lot. North Columbus Boulevard bounds the property on the west. The East Central Incinerator property consists of approximately seven (7) acres of land which currently accommodates the Incinerator Building, a Service Building (built on piles in 1968 at the north side of the former Municipal pier 34), an electric switch building, a scale house, two (2) small parking attendant buildings and a parking lot. Previous project: Construction of the incinerator building started in 1963 and was constructed on piles at the south side of the former Municipal Pier 33. During construction, the area between five municipal piers was filled in so that a greater area would be attained. Prior to construction, the five municipal piers were separate. The piers have existed at the site since the late 1700's. The Incinerator Building operated as a municipal trash incinerator until July 1988. The building is currently owned by the City of Philadelphia and is utilized as fleet management for the city sanitation department, storage, and repair shop. 3-18 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT Existing project: Section 566 of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1996 authorized a pilot program to provide for environmental assistance (design and construction) to non-Federal interests for publicly owned facilities in the five (5) county area surrounding the city of Philadelphia. The intent is to review contaminated sites which are potential sources of contamination to the water resources regime of an area and, as part of a cooperative arrangement with a local sponsor, remediate that site and remove the threat of contamination to the water resources of the area. In response to the growing number of abandoned, idled and under utilized commercial and industrial properties across the country, the USEPA launched the "Brownfields" initiative to investigate to spur the revitalization of these properties and return them to productive use. This initiative was authorized under Section 104 (d)(1) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980. As an outgrowth of this initiative, other Federal, State, and local agencies as well as Congress have also initiated programs and legislation in this regard. One of those implemented legislative measures was Section 566 of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1996. The first pilot project was the East Central Incinerator in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Local cooperation: The non-Federal sponsors are required to provide 25% of the project costs to include lands, easements and rights of way and bear all costs of operation and maintenance of the project after construction. The non-Federal sponsors receive credit for any design work completed prior to the federal involvement. Terminal facilities: None. Operations during fiscal year: Coordination of design PCA with local sponsor and within the Corps of Engineers. General Investigations: 37. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Cost and expenditures during the period for flood plain information studies were $229,334. 38. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Cost and expenditures during the period totaled $2,420,340. 39. SURVEYS Cost for the period were $55,769 for navigation studies, $63 for flood control studies, $1,526,894 for shoreline protection studies, $197,347 for special studies: a total of $1,780,073. 3-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 3-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 SEPT. 30, 1998 1. Barnegat Inlet, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2. Chesapeake & Delaware Canal, St. George's Bridge Replacement 3. Cedar Creek, DE (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Cold Spring Inlet, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Delaware River between Philadelphia, PA and Trenton, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost -98,076 21,789 2,100 754,000 1,212,000 1,341,000 1,228,500 751,511 1,211,583 1,288,725 1,275,068 -30,698 14,000,000 13,997,231 2,789 -3,575 31,083,849 30,994,363 20,928,433 20,908,521 13,917,000 13,793,140 14,000,000 14,000,000 15,500,000 106,500,000 14,001,341 13,998,657 15,498,402 106,495,417 256,100 256,100 115,000 92,364 135,000 511,000 359,000 368,000 123,431 520,156 351,394 373,298 428,200 403,102 35,100 35,100 879,275 879,275 7,141,651 7,136,304 1,134,346 1,134,346 150,00010 150,00010 72,147,8003 72,147,8003 1,925,000 3,378,000 1,059,000 3,834,000 53,280,0374 1,922,127 3,363,169 1,071,328 3,794,627 53,229,2054 550,000 550,000 565,000 565,000 3-20 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 SEPT. 30, 1998 6. Delaware River, PA, NJ, and DE Philadelphia to the Sea (Regular Funds) 7. Indian River Inlet and Bay, DE (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 8. Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, DE, and MD (Regular Funds) 9. Inland Waterway, Rehoboth Bay to Delaware Bay, DE and MD (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 11,563,500 20,680,240 13,734,500 12,856,000 11,649,045 20,586,484 13,772,311 12,778,810 70,000 476,000 17,965 74,999 477,724 18,887 1,323,775 1,323,775 210,000 210,000 132,535,5918 132,532,5988 12,054,000 17,757,000 13,123,260 14,768,000 307,034,2259 12,101,644 17,690,726 13,006,114 14,641,638 306,514,1629 17,356,718 17,357,915 283,000 146,000 42,000 197,000 276,019 154,231 35,273 191,575 3-21 57,879,8725 57,879,872 s 493,847,30819 493,313,51119 508,324 508,324 511,21018 511,21018 50,000 37,048 4,804,939 4,791,985 561,514 561,514 5,001,228 4,995,034 60,000 60,000 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 3-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 SEPT. 30, 1998 10. Manasquan River, NJ (Regular Funds) 11. Mispillion River (Regular Funds) 12. Murderkill River, DE (Regular Funds) 13. New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 14. Salem River, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 15. Schuylkill River, PA (Regular Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 330,000 768,619 186,500 324,936 773,222 189,607 8,008,27826,27 8,008,27826,27 5,307,81920 5,315,59920 738,83924 738,83924 183,200 187,093 165,000 4,364,00725 156,317 4,361,50025 37,630 37,630 200,300 202,761 40,000 219,918 25,000 39,187 217,359 26,102 2,597,332 2,597,407 71,54911 71,549" 2,831,000 2,545,000 2,634,851 2,415,000 50,544,16712 2,829,579 2,507,436 2,655,033 2,369,179 50,466,63112 1,196,581 1,196,581 99,000 99,000 3,560,000 671,230 594,000 3,701,461 2,236,604 650,586 26,000 25,587 1,399,000 119,509 2,408 517,772 1,735 -2,487 - -1,399 76,145 36,787 6,732,8642 6,698,4262 2,870,6866 2,870,6866 1,450,825 802,038 3,334,00713 3,334,00713 3-22 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 SEPT. 30, 1998 16. Tuckerton Creek (Regular Funds) 17. Wilmington Harbor, DE (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 18. Cape May Inlet to Lower Twp., NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 19. Delaware Coast Protection (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 20. Great Egg Harbor Inlet & Peck Beach, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost NewWork Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 25,000 1,923,000 258,744 1,470,000 35,372,293 25,387 1,916,708 263,578 1,457,158 35,347,145 60,242 60,242 29,000 15,384 -7,000 5,829 650,000 614,966 1,310,917 1,275,039 1,954,72514,7 1,954,725'14,7 3,092,000 2,060,000 4,370,000 3,728,000 90,769,725 3,079,009 2,056,636 4,378,512 3,654,402 90,652,412 60,000"7 60,000"7 1,260,000 1,973,616 150,000 191,164 64,000 163,006 6,163,478 3,275,000 3,229,367 - 1,765,000 263,000 16,312,176 -52,461 2,027,041 146,607 15,792,721 250,000 162,000 20,693 2,824,758 2,956,006 -214,000 210,000 5,089,95323 158,179 235,073 248,133 4,663,59923 215,350 215,350 1,268,67121 1,259,00221 - 2,380,000 1,658,000 31,032,000 145,239 2,591,461 1,672,833 31,021,838 3,281 80,478 904,000 525,000 17,057,281 80,709 1,752,978 17,394,740 3-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 3-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 SEPT. 30, 1998 21. Beltzville Lake, PA (Regular Funds) 22. Blue Marsh Lake, PA (Regular Funds) 25. Francis E. Walter Dam, PA (Regular Funds) 26. General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, PA (Regular Funds) 27. Glen Foerd, PA (Regular Funds) 30. Molly Ann's Brook, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 32. Prompton Lake (Regular Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 22,931,831 22,931,831 740,500 935,000 1,120,000 747,000 13,799,589 738,073 918,872 1,092,620 725,359 13,698,238 63,180,300 63,180,299 2,155,000 2,517,000 2,349,000 1,986,000 28,293,294 2,252,557 2,494,211 2,246,589 2,028,329 28,116,141 38,872 45,698 12,449,682's 12,437,32315 973,000 1,081,000 1,248,000 663,000 14,447,949 995,803 1,047,367 1,237,457 613,735 14,347,637 196,000 287,000 205,000 211,000 194,570 286,156 189,697 204,667 200,000 800,000 15,381 9,130 14,284 1,557,000 -123,000 4,580,000 7,090,000 323,470 1,780,216 8,110,218 8,177,256 220,000 137,705 741,000 4,164,795 1,700,000 78,757 1,980,000 1,192,715 517,000 606,000 588,000 541,000 519,392 618,520 573,281 509,760 4,073,105 4,073,105 4,025,364 3,969,450 1,000,000 38,795 16,448,000 16,287,474 3,900,00022 2,798,51622 4,609,48316 4,609,48316 9,655,641 9,592,469 3-24 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 'FY98 SEPT. 30, 1998 35. South Central, PA New Work Environmental Approp. - - - 4,650,000 4,650,000 Restoration Cost - - - 132,107 132,107 (Regular Funds) 36. Southeastern New Work Pennsylvania Approp. - - - 939,000 939,000 (Regular Funds) Cost - - - 36,373 36,373 * Total adjusted to correct discrepancies in prior years. 1. Includes $1,950,906 for 30 and 37 foot projects. 2. Includes $55,809 for new work funds expended on previous project. 3. Includes $2,489,173 for new work for previous projects, $105,000 for preauthorization studies and minus $142,015 adjustment new work toDelaware River, Philadelphia to Sea project from this project under 1954 modification. 4. Includes $552,720 for maintenance for previous projects, and $685,000 Jobs Bill Funds. 5. Excludes $12,976,054 for new work for previous projects and $142,015 adjustment from Delaware River, Philadelphia to Trenton, NJ under 1954 modification. 6. Includes $1,285 for reconnaissance and condition surveys in FY 1957, $1,792 Operations and Maintenance cost incurred for preperation of environmental impact statement, and $48,000 expended for maintenance on previous projects. 7. Excludes $412,400 spent for Continuing Authority project. 8. Includes $10,709,755 for new work for previous projects. 9. Includes $6,903,748 for maintenance for previous projects, and $9,500 Job Bill Funds. 10. Includes $50,000 Navy Department Funds & $100,00 Contributed Funds. 11. Excludes $1,824,940 Navy Department Funds. 12. Excludes $286,953 Navy Department Funds expended for maintenance. 13. Includes $525,000 for previous projects. 14. Includes $402,121 for new work for previous project, and $206,177 emergency relief funds. 15. Includes $40,000 appropriated and $61,551 expended under Code 710 Recreation Facilities. 16. Includes $63,000 appropriated and $61,551 expended under Code 710 Recreation Facilities, excluded $23,600 preauthorization studies under 1948 modification. 17. Excludes $213,336 spent on Continuing Authority project. 18. Excluded $10,000 for previous projects. 19. Includes $1,025,409 for maintenance of previous projects, and $8,000 Jobs Bill funds. 20. Includes$2,054 for maintenance for previous projects. 21. Excludes $85,000 cash and $130,000 services furnished during preconstruction planning. 22. Includes $112,000 for work done for the State of New Jersey. 23. Includes $704,000 AE&D. 24. Includes $148,798 for new work on previous projects. 25. Includes $61,172 for maintenance on previouse projects. 26. Includes $39,000 for new work for previous projects. 27. Includes $555,809 for previous projects. 3-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACITIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 3-B Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 2, 1985 Oct. 27, 1990 Dec. 10, 1979 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 BARNEGAT INLET, NJ (See Section 1 of Text) An 8-foot depth through inlet to Oyster Creek Channel across inner bar, 10-foot depth through outer bar and for jetties. A channel of suitable hydraulic characteristics from gorge to Oyster Creek Channel, and thence to deep water in bay. Maintenance dredging of channel to connect main inlet channel with Barnegat City Harbor. Construction of a parallel, 4270 foot rubble mound south jetty and dredging a channel 10 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 11,300 feet long. CHESAPEAKE AND DELAWARE CANAL ST. GEORGES BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, DE (See Section 2 of Text) The replacement of the U.S. Route 13 bridge near St. Georges, DE, and the state may be reimbursed if it carries out the work CEDAR CREEK, NJ (See Section 3 of Text) Creek ranges in depth from 13 feet at the Route 36 bridges to less than 5 feet at sseveral locations. Channel width varies from 75 feet to 250 feet. COLD SPRING INLET, NJ (See Section 4 of Text) An inlet channel 25 feet deep and jetties. A 20-foot channel to deep water in harbor DELAWARE RIVER BETWEEN PHILADELPHIA, PA AND TRENTON, NJ (See Section 5 of Text) A channel 28 feet deep, 300 feet wide between Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA and Delair Bridge Channel 25 feet deep from Delair Bridge to Trenton, NJ, and maintenance of 12-foot channel from upper end of 25-foot project to Penn Central R.R. Bridge at Ferry St., Trenton. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.85, 74th Cong., 2nd sess.' H. Doc. 358, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 236, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. WRDA 1990 River and Harbor Act of 1960 H. Doc. 388, 59th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 262, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. 3-26 Documents PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 19352 Aug. 26,1937 Jul. 24, 1946 Sept. 3, 1954 Jun. 25, 1910 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19352 Jun. 20, 19383 Mar. 2, 19454 Mar. 2, 19454 Mar. 2, 19454 Auxiliary channel, 20 feet deep east of Burlington Island. A cross channel 8 feet deep, opposite Delanco, NJ Anchorage at mouth of Biles Creek A channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide between Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA, and upstream end of Newbold Island, thence 35 feet deep to Trenton Marine Terminal and turning basin to 800 feet wide. Relocate channel at railroad bridge at Delair and suitably reconstruct bridge. Construct necessary bank protection works; and eliminate authorized anchorage near mouth of Biles Creek, PA DELAWARE RIVER, PA, NJ, AND DE, PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA (See Section 6 of Text) Channel 35 feet deep from Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA to Delaware Bay. Anchorages 35 feet deep at Port Richmond and Mantua Creek, a 30 foot anchorage at Gloucester, NJ and extend 1,000 foot channel in Philadelphia Harbor to Horseshoe Bend. An anchorage 35 feet deep at Marcus Hook, PA A channel 37 feet deep from Philadelphia - Camden Bridge to Navy Yard, thence 40 feet deep to deep water in Delaware Bay. A 37-foot depth channel from Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA to Philadelphia-Camden Bridge A 37-foot depth in an enlargement of anchorage near Mantua Creek and Marcus Hook. Maintain enlarged channel opposite Philadelphia Navy Yard. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 66, 74th Cong., 1st sess' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 90, 74th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 679, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 358, 83d Cong., 2nd sess.' Doc. 733, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 304, 71st Cong., 2nd sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 159, 75th Cong. 3rd sess.' H. Doc. 580, 76th Cong. Ist sess.' H. Doc. 340, 77th Cong. 1st sess.' Specified in Act. H. Doc. 358, 83rd Cong. 2nd sess.' 3-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACITIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 3-B Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized A channel from Allegheny Ave., to Naval Base 40 feet deep, 400 feet wide along west side of channel through Philadelphia Harbor and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend. Anchorages at Reedy Point, Deepwater Point, Marcus Hook, and Mantua Creek 40 feet deep and 2,300 feet wide with mean lengths of 8,000, 5,200,13,650 and 11,500 feet respectively. INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DE (See Section 7 of Text) A 15-foot inlet channel, steel and stone jetties, 6 foot channel from end of inlet channel to deep water in the bay and authority to modify interior inlet channel. A 9-foot channel from inlet to Old Landing, including basin, and 4-foot channel to highway bridge at Millsboro. INLAND WATERWAY FROM DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DE & MD (See Section 8 of Text) A sea level channel 27 feet deep, 250 feet wide from Delaware River to Elk River and 400 feet wide down Elk River and Chesapeake Bay to deep water at or near Pooles Island; alter existing bridges over canal; enlarge Delaware City Branch Channel to 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, with a basin same depth and revetment of both banks east of Fifth Street; enlarge anchorage and mooring basin in Back Creek to 400 feet wide, 1,000 feet long and 12 feet deep; extend jetties at Reedy Point; and construct bulkheads. Construct a 4-lane high-level fixed highway bridge at or near St. Georges. A channel 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide from Delaware River through Elk River and Chesapeake Bay. For an 8-foot depth and width increased to 150 feet in Delaware Bay. H. Doc. 185, 85th Cong., 1st sess. 74th Cong., 1st sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 330, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 201, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Docs. 18 and 24, 736 Cong., 2nd sess.' Public Law 310, 76th Cong., Ist sess. S. Doc. 123, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess.' H. Doc. 275, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess.'. 3-28 Documents Sept. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 7, 1939 Sept. 3, 1954 Aug. 30, 1935 -- - PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-B Acts Jul. 25, 1912 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1912 Aug. 26, 1937 Sept. 3, 1954 Jul. 13, 1982 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized INLAND WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DE (See Section 9 of text) For a 6-foot depth canal to connect Rehoboth Bay and Delaware Bay. For a 6-foot depth entrance near Lewes, for jetties, for widening the canal from Broadkill River to Lewes and basin. For a 10-foot depth from Delaware Bay to Lewes and in basin, and for extending jetties. 5 MANASQUAN RIVER, NJ (See Section 10 of Text) Channel 8 feet deep and provision of works designed to secure channel. Widening channel on northerly side. Deepening channel to 12 and 14 feet, 10 and 12 foot anchorages.7 MISPILLION RIVER, DE (See Section 11 of Text) A 6-foot depth and extention of south. Extention of north jetty. A channel 9 feet deep, 80 feet wide from like depth in Delaware Bay to The landward end of the jetties and thence 60 feet wide to Milford, Including 3 cutoffs, with a turning basin at Milford. MURDERKILL RIVER, DE (See Section 12 of Text) A channel 7 feet deep at low water from Frederica to the 7 foot curve in Delaware Bay, 80 feet wide down to the mouth, and 150 feet wide at bottom and 250 feet wide at top from the mouth to the 7 foot curve in the bay. Embankment of dredged material on each side to a height of at least 2 feet above high spring tides. Documents H. Doc. 823, 60th Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 51, 61st Cong., 3rd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 56, 75th Cong., 2nd sess.' H. Doc. 344, 77th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 482, 70th Cong., 2nd sess. Senate Committee Doc., 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 356, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 678, 62 nd Cong., 2 nd sess.' Rivers and Harbor Comm., Doc. 83 S. Doc. 229, 81st Cong., 2nd sess.' H. Ex. Doc. 21, 52nd Cong., 1st Sess. (See page 981 in Annual Report of 1892.) 3-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACITIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 3-B Acts Jul. 1, 1945 Nov. 17, 1986 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 8, 1917 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 24, 1946 Jun. 13, 1902 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY (See Section 13 of Text) A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and generally 100 feet wide, extending from the Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, NJ to Delaware Bay above Cape May, NJ. Construction of a canal of similar dimensions from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay via the New England Creek basin, with adequate jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance. To increase the depth of the 2,000, foot reach of the Waterway in Cape May County to 15 feet. SALEM RIVER, NJ (See Section 14 of Text) A channel of 10-foot depth from Delaware River Masters Sand Plant Extention of project to Clements Bridge. A channel of 20-foot depth SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA (See Section 15 of Text) Depths of 35 feet from mouth to Girard Point thence 30 feet, 26, and 22 feet to University Avenue Bridge, Philadelphia. A depth of 30 feet instead of 35 feet between the mouth and the conditional restoration and maintenance of the channel belowPassyunk Ave., channel dimensions between Passyunk Ave., and' by the United States. A depth of 33 feet from the channel in Delaware River to Passyunk Ave., restoration of the project channel dimensions between Passyunk Ave., and University Ave., and full maintenance of the entire project. TUCKERTON CREEK, NJ (See Section 16 of Text) For depths of 6, 5, and 3 feet. Documents H. Doc. 133, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 525 79th Cong., 2nd sess. WRDA of 1986 H. Doc. 217, 70th Cong., 1st Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 15, 73rd Cong., Ist sess.' WRDA of 1986' H. Doc. 1270, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 40, 71st Cong., 2nd sess' H. Doc. 699, 79th Cong., 2nd sess' H. Doc. 274, 56 th Cong., Ist Sess. 3-30 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-B Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Substitution of channel as across Little Tuckerton Bay. Specified in Act. H. Doc. 1040, 6 4th Cong., 1"ss ess. Jun. 3,1896 Jul. 25,1912 Sept. 22, 1922 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935' ,Qct. 17, 1940 Jul. 14, 1960 WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE (See Section 17 of Text) Depths of 21, 10 and 7 feet and jetties. Purchase or construct a dredge and auxiliaries including a wharf and depot, and maintenance of project. Entrance channel and basin with 25-foot depth and construction by local interests of new south jetty. A 30-foot depth between Delaware River and Lobdell Canal and modification or removal of a portion of north jetty. Completion of new south jetty by the United States subject to provision that city of Wilmington reimburse the United States for cost, without interest, of any part of structure that may subsequently be occupied and utilized for city activities. Permit temporary occupancy by city of Wilmington of any part of south jetty for city activities under revocable license, provided occupied portion of jetty is properly maintained without expense to the United States. A 35-foot depth between Delaware River ship channel and Lobdell Canal including turning basin of same depth, opposite Wilmington Marine Terminal, 200 feet wide, 2,900 feet long on north side of channel, and 2,000 feet long on north side of basin. H. Doc. 66, 54 'h Cong., 1" sess. Annual Report, 1897 p. 12501 H. Doc. 359, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 114, 67th Cong., 1st sess. and S. Committee Print, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 32, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 658, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 88, 86th Cong., 2nd sess. 3-31 Mar. 3, 1905 Documents REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACITIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 3-B Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TOWNSHIP, NJ (See Section 18 of Text) Consists of beach fill; dune fill; new groins; main tenance of existing groins; rehabilitation of an existing seawall; and a breakwater with weir and deposition basin at Cape May Inlet. Rivers & Harbors Act of 1968 Nov. 17, 1986 Project may be constructed separately or in combination with any other feature of the project. WRDA of 1986 DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION (See Section 19 of Text) Provides for Federal participation in the cost of restoration and subsequent periodic nourishment, not to exceed 10 years, of the shore from Rehoboth Beach to Indian River Inlet. H. Doc. 90, 90th Cong., 2nd sess. Nov. 17, 1986 Project is modified to authorized the construction of sand bypass facilities and stone revetment erosion control measures at Indian River Inlet, DE.8 WRDA of 1986 Sec. 869 Nov. 17, 1986 GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET & PECK BEACH, NJ (See Section 20 of Text) Project may be constructed separately or in combination with any other feature of the project. River and Harbor Act of 1965. WRDA of 1986. Consists of providing initial beachfill, with subsequent periodic nourishment, with a minimum berm width of 100 feet at an elevation of 8 feet above mean low water. BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA (See Section 21 of Text) Provides for multiple-purpose development for water supply flood control and recreation BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA (See Section 22 of Text) Provides for multiple purpose development for water supply, flood, control, and recreation. Site is located on Tulpehocken Creek about 1 1/2 miles upstream from its confluence with Plum Creek and about six miles northwest of Reading, PA. FRANCIS E. WALTER DAM, PA (See Section 25 of Text) Provided for a single-purpose flood control reservoir H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 587, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. 3-32 Documents PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-B Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation. H. Doc 522, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA (See Section 26 of Text) A single-purpose flood control reservoir with a capacity of 24,500 acre-feet formed by an earth embankment. GLEN FOERD, PA (See Section 27 of Text) Provides for restoration of the 1,350-foot river wall on the perimeter of the historic property for shoreline protection. MOLLY ANN'S BROOK, NJ (See Section 30 of Text) Modify Channel with a total length of 2.5 miles miles. Channel will include both trapezoidal channel sections and walled sections. Five bridges will be replaced and one building will removed. PROMPTON LAKE, PA (See Section 33 of Text) Provides for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. Provides for multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present singlepurpose flood control project. SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT, PA (See Section 35 of Text) Pilot program providing environmental assistance to non-Federal Interests in South Central Pennsylvania. Provides $10 million in design and construction assistance under the Section 313 progam. Specifies the funds among eight specific projects. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA, PA (See Section 36 of Text) Pilot program providing for environmental assistance (design and construction) to non-Federal interests for publicly owned facilities in the five (5) county area surrounding the City of Philadelphia. H. Doc 113, 80th Cong., 1st sess. Section 106, WRDA of 1990 WRDA of 1986 H. Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. Section 313, WRDA of 1992 H. Report 105-190 Conference Report 105-271 Section 566, WRDA of 1996 3-33 Documents Nov. 17, 1986 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACITIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 3-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents "Brownfields" initiative to investigate to spur the revitalization of these Section 104 (d)(1) properties and return them to productive use. of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Also Public Works Administration September 6, 1933, and Emergency Relief Administration, May 28, 1935. 3. Channel 37 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Naval Base to Philadelphia-Camden Bridge, deferred for restudy. 4. Channel 37 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Philadelphia-Camden Bridge to Allegheny Ave. deferred for restudy. 5. Extension of jetties considered to be active. 6. The 10 and 12 foot anchorages are considered inactive. 7. Also May 28, 1935, under Emergency Relief Administration. 8. Deauthorized the remaining portion of the project. 3-34 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Full Report September 30, 1998 See Annual Operation and Active Projects Status Report For Construction Maintenance Absecon Creek, NJ Absecon Inlet, NJ Alloway Creek, NJ' Aquatic Plant Control Appoquinimink River,DE Big Timber Creek, NJ Broadkill River, DE Cohansey River, NJ Cooper River, NJ' Delaware Bay to Millville Millville fixed bridge to upper end of project Delaware River, Pennsville, NJ Delaware River Vicinity of Camden, NJ Dennis Creek, NJ' Double Creek, NJ' Harbor of Refuge Goshen Creek, NJ' Ice Harbor at Marcus Hook, PA" 5 Ice Harbor at New Castle, DE"' 5 Inland Waterway from Chincoteague Bay to Delaware Bay Leipsic River, DE' Little Egg Harbor, NJ"3 Little River, DE Mantua Creek, NJ Maurice River, NJ **Neshaminy State Park Harbor, PA Oldmans Creek, NJ **Pepper Creek, DE Raccoon Creek, NJ Schuylkill River above Fairmount Dam, PA' COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED INACTIVE COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED SEE TABLE 3-F COMPLETED ACTIVE INACTIVE COMPLETED COMPLETED INACTIVE INACTIVE INACTIVE COMPLETED INACTIVE INACTIVE COMPLETED COMPLETED ACTIVE COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED 1989 1990 1989 1975 1934 1989 1976 1995 1989 1997 1897 1912 1964 1905 1928 1898 1981 1931 6 1980 1966 1997 1968 1941 1989 1994 1955 11,935 534,20916 21,398 87,594 36,973 58,6652 68,228 146,75620 33,102 143,98421 256,624 5,045,17322 4,701 7,800 5,162,23018 15,359 208,964 224,704 168,41211 36,956 15,048 12,016 169,6877 110,000 128,20314 31,188 138,094's 83,66513 4,291,810 84,186* 5,985173"7 55,117 41,270 71,925' 243,641 3,749,983 396,528* 161,913 3,261,386 4 1,169,01419 870 14,336 98,36012 32,345 288,310 339,340' 1,577,194 54,601 32,125 38,988' 368,001 4 3-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1998 TABLE 3-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Full Report September 30, 1998 See Annual Operation and Active Projects Status Report For Construction Maintenance Smyrna River, DE 1949 - Delaware River to Wharf at Smyrna Landing9 COMPLETED - 198,844 197,327 Wharf at Smyrna Landing to fixed bridge. SEE TABLE 3-F - - Toms River, NJ ACTIVE 1996 10,050 262,485 Waterway from Indian River ACTIVE 1997 - 340,104 Inlet to Rehoboth Bay, DE Woodbury Creek, NJ' COMPLETED 1940 27,09310 56,474 For Last Cost to Full Report September 30, 1998 See Annual Operation and Deferred Projects Status Report For Construction Maintenance St. Jones River, DE 1961 - Delaware Bay to Lebanon"8 207,102 66,093 Jetties and new entrance at mouth DEFERRED - - 1. Completed. 2. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds expended for new work. 3. Abandonment recommended in House Doc. 467, 69th Congress,1lst Sess. 4. Maintenance assumed by local interests. 5. Harbor not now required by commerce. ,6: Last appropriation for project was in 1852. No information is at hand relative to work done. 7. Includes $3,000 for new work for previous projects. 8. Includes $54,590 new work and $28,935 maintenance funds expended on previous projects. 9. Includes $55,085 new work and $22,723 maintenance funds expended on previous projects. 10. Includes $2,950 new work funds expended on previous projects. 11. Entire amount expended on previous projects repealed in 1905. 12. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds and includes $25,330 for maintenance for previous project. 13. Encludes $757 new work funds expended on previous projects. 14. Excludes $327,957 contributed funds allotted expended for new work. 15. Excludes $38,988 non-Federal funds. 16. Includes $116,497 for new work on previous projects. 17. Includes $2,489,173 for maintenance for previous projects. 18. Includes $2,749,452 for new work for previous projects. 19. Excludes $1,089 for reconnaissance and condition surveys fiscal year 1963. 20. Includes $36,000 for new work for previous projects. 21. Includes $43,000 new work funds expended on previous projects. 22. Includes $1,950,906 for 30 and 37 foot projects. * Operation and maintenance figure includes cost incurred for preparation of environmental impact statements. ** Projects authorized by the Chief of Engineers. 3-36 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1998 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Brigantine Island INACTIVE* - - Corson Inlet and Ludlam Beach, NJ INACTIVE* 1978 314,400 - Long Beach Island INACTIVE* - - - Townsends Inlet and Seven Mile Beach, NJ INACTIVE* - - - * NO CURRENT YEAR FUNDS. OTHER AUTHORIZED TABLE 3-E FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1998 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Allentown, Lehigh River, PA COMPLETED 1961 1,615,581 ' Bethlehem, Lehigh River, PA COMPLETED 1966 4,520,995 1 Mt. Holly, NJ COMPLETED 1946 283,655 ' Pottstown, PA ACTIVE 1984 487,366 Hay Creek, Birdsboro, PA INACTIVE 1984 335,299 Tamaqua, PA ACTIVE 1990 628,4672 1. Maintenance assumed by local interest as required by authorizing project. 2. Transferred from Baltimore District in FY 1989. 3-37 REPORT OF THE SECRECTARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1998 TABLE 3-F DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Date Federal Contributed Report See Annual And Funds Funds Navigation Projects Report For Authority Expended Expended Appoquinimink River, DE' 1931 3 Oct 78 HD 95-351 $78,243 - Atlantic City, NJ 1972 HD 538 918 $2,083,289 - Barnegat Light, NJ 1964 HD 208 918 $70,908 - Cape May City, NJ 1961 3 Sep 54 HD 206 918 $22,957 - Delaware County, PA 1931 PL 99-662 52 Stat. 323 $7,139 - Long Beach Island, NJ 1964 14 Jul 60 HD 208 918 $40,665 - Ocean City, NJ 1969 HD 184 918 $395,8319 - Rehoboth Beach to Indian River 1965 HD 216 Inlet, DE 918 $326,116 - For Last Full Date Federal Contributed Report See Annual And Funds Funds Beach Erosion Projects Report For Authority Expended Expended Hereford Inlet 1978 Section 12 PL 93-251 $314,400 - Maurice River, NJ 1948 Section 12 PL 93-251 - - Millville fixed bridge to upper end of project 2 Oldmans Creek, NJ3 1941 2 Nov 79 Section 12 PL 93-251 $63,313 - Rancocas River, NJ4 1942 2 Nov 79 Section 12 PL 93-251 $57,590 - Smyrna River, DE5 1949 2 Nov 79 Wharf at Smyrna Landing to fixed HD 95-157 $396,169 - bridge. 3-38 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-F DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Date Federal Contributed Report See Annual And Funds Funds Flood Control Projects Report For Authority Expended Expended Aquashicola Reservoir, PA 1963 17 Nov 86 PL 99-662 46 Stat. 918 - - Chester River, 17 Nov 86 Delaware County, PA 1931 PL 99-662 52 Stat. 323 Delaware River, Mouth of 1917 5 Aug 77 Neversink HD 94-192 - - Lehigh River at Bethlehem, PA6 2 Nov 79 1966 Section 12 PL 93-251 $4,520,995 - Maiden Creek Reservoir, PA 1963 17 Nov 86 PL 99-662 46 Stat. 918 - - Tocks Island, PA, NJ, and NY8 1979 23 Oct 62 PL 87-874 65,106,26010 Tocks Island (Relocation of U.S. 1979 23 Oct 62 Route 209 only) PA8 PL 87-874 $195,223 - Trexler Lake, PA 1981 17 Nov 86 PL 99-662 76 Stat. 1180 - - 1. Includes $36,973 new work, and $41,270 for maintenance. 2. There is no need now for this portion of the project. 3. Includes $31,188 new work, and $32,125 for maintenance. 4. Includes $44,500 new work, and $13,090 for maintenance. 5. Includes $143,759 new work, $55,085 previous project, $174,602 for maintenance, and $22,723 maintenance, previous project. 6. Maintenance assumed by local interest. 7. Excludes $58,585 Accelerated Public Works funds expended for extention to two groins. 8. National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 terminated Corps authority to proceed with the project. Legislation would be required to proceed with the project. 9. Excludes cost of $1,146,325 to local interests and $272,766 Federal participation expended under Public Works Acceleration Program for extention of five existing groins completed 11 May 1964. 10. Includes $3,489,088 for AE&D. 3-39 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT * This district comprises the watershed of Susquehanna River and its tributaries from headwaters in south central New York State through central Pennsylvania to its mouth in Chesapeake Bay; watershed of the Potomac River and its tributaries from headwaters in Maryland, eastern West Virginia, and Northern Virginia to its mouth in Chesapeake Bay; District of Columbia; and southwestern portion of Delaware. It includes that portion of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries north of Smith Point, MD, on western shore of the bay, and includes that portion of Maryland between Chesapeake Bay and Atlantic Ocean. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Baltimore Harbor and Channels, M D and VA ....................... .............. 4-3 2. Baltimore Harbor, MD, Collection and Removal of Drift ............ 4-4 3. Chester River, MD ........ ......................... 4-4 4. Crisfield Harbor, MD ................................... 4-5 5. Fishing Bay, M D .................. ................... 4-5 6. Fishing Creek, M D ...................................... 4-5 7. Herring Bay & Rockhold Creek, MD ........... 4-6 8. Herring Creek, Tall Timbers, MD...............4-6 9. Honga River and Tar Bay, MD .................. 4-6 10. Lower Thorofare, Deal Island, MD ... ......4-7 11. Neabsco Creek, VA .................................... 4-7 12. Northeast River, MD ............................ 4-7 13. Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD ........... .... 4-7 14. Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, DC, ................. Collection and Removal of Drift ............. 4- 8 15. Potomac River - Aquatic Plant Control, MD, VA, and DC ............................... 4-8 16. Potomac River at Alexandria, VA..............4-8 17. Potomac River Below Washington, DC........4-9 18. Prevention of Obstructions and Injurious Deposits, MD .................... 4-9 19. Rock Hall Harbor, MD ............................... 4-9 20. Tedious Creek, M D ................................. 4-10 21. Twitch Cove and Big Thorofare, MD ........ 4-10 22. Washington Harbor, DC ............................ 4-10 23. Wicomico River, MD .................................. 4-11 24. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys......4-11 25. Navigation Work under Special Authorization ......................................... 4-11 Beach Erosion Control 26. Beach Erosion Control Work under Special Authorization .................... 4-12 27. Atlantic Coast of Maryland ....... ........... 4-12 Flood Control Page 28. Broad Top Region, PA ............................... 4-12 29. Cumberland MD, and Ridgeley, WV..........4-12 30. Jennings Randolph Lake, MD and WV ...... 4-13 31. Lackawanna River Basin, PA......................4-13 31A. Aylesworth Creek Lake, PA.......................4-13 32. Lock Haven, PA ................................. .4-13 33. M oorefield, W V ......................................... 4-14 34. Lackawanna River, Olyphant, PA ........... 4-14 35. Paxton Creek, Harrisburg, PA ................. 4-14 36. Petersburg, W V ....................................... 4-15 37. Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, Juniata River, PA .............. ........ 4-15 38. Lackawanna River, Scranton, PA.............4-15 39. South Central Pennsylvania Environmental Improvement Program ........................................ 4-16 40. Southern New York Flood Control Projects ...................................... 4-16 40A. Addison, NY.................................4-16 40B. Almond Lake, NY ................................... 4-16 40C. Arkport Dam, NY ......... ......................... 4-17 40D. Avoca, NY ......................... ........... 4-17 40E. Binghamton, NY ...................................... 4-17 40F. Canisteo, NY ........................................ ... 4-17 40G. Corning, NY ........................ .............. 4-18 40H. East Sidney, NY ......... .......................... 4-18 401. Elmira, NY ...................... 4-18 40J. Hornell, NY ...................... 4-19 40K. Lisle, NY ....... .................. ... ........ 4-19 40L. Oxford, NY ................................................. 4-19 40M. Whitney Point Lake, NY ............................ 4-20 40N. Whitney Point Village, NY ........................ 4-20 41. Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, PA ....4-20 42. Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects, NY and PA .............................. 4-20 42A. Cowanesque Lake, PA ................................ 4-20 4-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Flood Control (cont'd) Page 42B. Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA........................4-21 43. West Branch of Susquehanna River, PA ................................................. 4-21 43A. Alvin R. Bush Dam, PA ............................. 4-21 43B. Curwensville Lake, PA..........................4-22 43C. Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, PA...................4-22 44. Wyoming Valley, PA (Levee Raising)........4-22 45. York, Indian Rock Dam, PA.......................4-23 46. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects.......................................4-23 47. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ...................................... 4-23 48. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization...........................................4-23 Environmental Restoration 49. Anacostia River & Tributaries, MD & DC ..................................... 4-23 50. Chesapeake Bay Oyster Recovery, MD ..................................... 4-24 51. Poplar Island, MD .................................... 4-24 52. Rooster Island, Dorchester County, MD.....4-24 Regulatory Program 53. Regulatory Program .................................... 4-25 Water Supply Page 54. Washington Aqueduct ................................. 4-25 55. 56. 57. General Investigations Surveys ........ .......................... ........... 4-25 Collection and Study of Basic Data ............ 4-25 Preconstruction Engineering and Design............................... ....... 4-25 Tables Table 4-A Cost and Financial Statement...........4-27 Table 4-B Authorizing Legislation ................... 4-34 Table 4-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ....................... 4-42 Table 4-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects...........................4-44 Table 4-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........................... 4-44 Table 4-F Not Applicable Table 4-G Deauthorized Projects ......................... 4-46 Table 4-H Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys...........................4-48 Table 4-I Inspection of Completed Projects ......................... 4-49 4-2 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT NAVIGATION 1. BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS, MD AND VA Location. Baltimore Harbor is at the head of the navigable portion of Patapsco River about 12 miles from Chesapeake Bay. The Patapsco River rises near the town of Westminster in Carroll County, MD, and flows generally southeast for about 65 miles to enter Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12278.) Existing project. a. A uniform main channel depth of 50 feet between Cape Charles, VA, and Fort McHenry at Baltimore, MD, with dimensions as follows: (1) Cape Henry Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide from the 50-foot depth curve in the Atlantic Ocean to that depth in Chesapeake Bay, a distance of 3.0 miles; (2) York Spit Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide connecting the 50-foot depth curves in Chesapeake Bay near York Spit, a distance of 18.4 miles; (3) Rappahannock Shoal Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide connecting the 50-foot depth curves in the Chesapeake Bay opposite the Rappahannock River, a distance of 10.3 miles; and (4) Baltimore Harbor Approach Channels: 50 feet deep and generally 800 feet wide, widened at the approach and bends, from the 50-foot depth curve in Chesapeake Bay opposite the mouth of the Magothy River to Fort McHenry on the Patapsco River, a distance of 20.2 miles. b. Branch channels with dimensions as follows: (1) Connecting Channel to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal Approach Channel: 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 15.6 miles long from the Cutoff Angle in the main channel to the 35-foot depth curves in the natural channel on the east side of Chesapeake Bay which is part of the inland waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay. The channel includes the Brewerton Extension and Swan Point and Tolchester Channels; (2) Curtis Bay: 50 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 2.3 miles long from the main channel to and including a turning basin at the head of Curtis Bay; (3) Curtis Creek: (a) a channel, 35 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide, from the 50-foot channel in Curtis Bay to 750 feet downstream of the Pennington Avenue Bridge; (b) a channel, 22 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide, from the 35-foot channel to and along the marginal wharf of the Curtis Bay Ordnance Depot; (c) an irregular shaped 3-acre basin, with a depth of 18 feet, adjacent to the head of the 22-foot channel; (d) a basin, 15 feet deep and 450 feet wide, from the end of the 22-foot channel to the end of the marginal wharf; and (e) a channel, 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide, from the 22-foot channel south of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Bridge to the vicinity of Arundel Cove, a distance of 2,800 feet, thence 100 feet wide in Arundel Cove for a distance of 2,100 feet, with an anchorage basin, 700 feet square, adjacent to the channel and southwest of the wharf of the Coast Guard Depot at Curtis Bay; (4) Middle Branch; Ferry Bar East Section: a channel, 42 feet deep and 600 feet wide, from the main channel at Fort McHenry to Ferry Bar, a distance of 1.5 miles; and (5) Northwest Branch: Federal maintenance of 39-foot or 35-foot deep channels after either depth has been provided by local interests: (a) East Channel: a channel, 49 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 1.0 mile long with a turning basin at the head of the channel from that depth existing at the time of construction; and (b) West Channel: a channel, 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 1.3 miles long with a turning basin at the head of the channel from that depth existing at the time of construction. c. The following anchorages: (1) Riverview Anchorage No. 2: 30 feet deep, 2,400 feet long, and 1,200 feet wide; (2) Riverview Anchorage No. 1: 35 feet deep, 4,500 feet long, and 1,500 feet wide; and (3) Fort McHenry Anchorage: 35 feet deep, 3,500 feet long, and 400 feet wide. The mean range of tide is 2.8 feet at the Cape Henry Channel, 2.3 feet at the York Spit Channel, 1.4 feet at the Rappahannock Shoal Channel, 0.8 foot at the Craighill Entrance, 0.9 foot in the Cutoff Section, 1.1 feet at Fort McHenry, and 1.2 feet at Pooles Island in the upper Chesapeake Bay. Depths refer to mean low water. Estimated cost for new work is $361,581,000 which includes: $8,330,000 for completed work through the River and Harbor Act of 1945; $38,411,000 for work completed under the River and Harbor Act of 1958 of which $33,991,000 is Corps of Engineers, $60,000 is U.S. Coast Guard and $4,360,000 is non-Federal; and $314,840,000 (October 1989 prices) for work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970, of which $460,000 is U.S. Coast Guard and $314,380,000 is Corps of Engineers and non-Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 4-3 of Fiscal Year 1982 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. The Port of Baltimore has 45 miles of waterfront of which 25 miles are industrially developed. There are 94 covered and open overseas piers for the loading and discharging of 173 ships, providing 84 general cargo, 65 specialized cargo, and 24 public bulk cargo berths. The existing ground storage is equivalent to 53,700 railroad cars of cargo. There are 31 public general merchandise warehouses, with 4.9 million square feet of storage space and 4.7 million cubic feet of cold storage space. Eight ship-building, ship repair, and ship dismantling yards are available for handling up to 90 vessels. The two grain elevators in the port have a capacity of about 8 million bushels. Latest description of terminal facilities is in "Port Series No. 10 (revised 1991)" on Port of Baltimore, MD, (issued by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors). Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work, Baltimore District: Studies for completing the remaining new work under the River and Harbor Act of 1958, widening the western five miles of the Connecting Channel (Brewerton Channel Eastern Extension) from 450 to 600 feet wide, were completed during the fiscal 4-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 year 1997 at a total cost of $952,000 ($121,700 during FY 97). The final Baltimore Harbor & Channels, Maryland and Virginia, 42-Foot Project Brewerton Channel Eastern Extension, Maryland-Limited Reevaluation Report and Environmental Assessment, recommending widening of the channel to 600 feet was submitted to Headquarters USACE on August 21, 1997 for approval and approved by Headquarters USACE on October 15, 1997. New Work, Norfolk District: None. Maintenance, Baltimore District: Condition surveys of the project channels were made. Ongoing studies continued for preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement to determine the feasibility of using the proposed Site 104 open water placement area in the Chesapeake Bay, and preparation of a decision document and Environmental Assessment to determine the feasibility of cost-sharing the renovation of the CSX/Cox Creek dredged material containment facility. Maintenance dredging, by contract, of the Craighill Entrance, Craighill Angle, Ft. McHenry Channel, and the Brewerton Channel Eastern Extension commenced on November 22, 1997 and was completed on March 21, 1998. Approximately 2,633,938 cubic yards of material were dredged and deposited in the approved Hart-Miller Island containment facility in the Chesapeake Bay at a cost of $9,994,028. A contract in the amount of $14,622,000 was awarded on September 30, 1998 to dredge an estimated 2.8 million cubic yards of material from the Craighill Channel, Craighill Upper Range, Cutoff Angle, Brewerton Channel, Brewerton Angle, Northwest branch West Channel, Brewerton Channel Eastern Extension, and Tolchester Channel and to deposit the material in the approved Hart-Miller Island containment facility in the Chesapeake Bay. Dredging commenced in December 1998 and is to be completed in March 1999. Maintenance, Norfolk District: Condition surveys were made of the Rappahannock Shoal and Atlantic Ocean Channels. Maintenance dredging, by contract, of the Cape Henry and York Spit Channels commenced on January 5, 1998 and was completed on May 15, 1998 at a cost of $4,677,930. Approximately 1,169,637 cubic yards were dredged from the Cape Henry Channel and deposited in the approved Dam Neck Ocean Placement Area, and approximately 371,200 cubic yards were dredged from the York Spit Channel and depositied in the Wolf Trap Alternate open water placement area in the Chesapeake Bay. 2. BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD, COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Project applies to Baltimore Harbor, MD, and its tributaries. Existing project. Provides for collection and removal of drift from Baltimore Harbor and its tributary waters, and authorizes the Secretary of the Army to allot such amounts as may be necessary for work from appropriations for maintenance and improvement of existing river and harbor works or other available appropriations, and that this work shall be carried as a separate and distinct project. It is wholly a work of maintenance. Purpose of work is to afford relief from variable conditions of obstruction. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Section 1 of this text. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations, by hired labor, consisted of collection and disposal of 10,800 cubic feet of driftwood, ranging from small blocks up to timbers of large dimensions. 3. CHESTER RIVER, MD Location. Rises in Kent County, DE, and flows 50 miles generally southwesterly and empties into the Chesapeake Bay. Kent Island Narrows is a passage connecting Chester River and Eastern Bay. Wells Cove is an indentation on the easterly side of Kent Island Narrows about 0.4 mile south of the highway bridge crossing the Narrows. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 12266 and 12270.) Previous project. For details see page 262 of the 1960 Annual Report. Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Crumpton to Jones Landing, section included in project is about 5.5 miles long with the lower end of the section being about 37 miles above mouth of river; for a channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 75 feet wide from Chester River to Eastern Bay through Kent Island Narrows; and a channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 75 feet wide extending from 7-foot deep curve in Kent Island Narrows 800 feet into Wells Cove with a basin of same depth and 300 feet square at head of channel. Mean range of tide is 2.4 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $32,454, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Widening 7-foot deep channel from 75 to 100 feet from Chester River to Eastern Bay through Kent Island Narrows was deauthorized and is excluded from the foregoing estimate. Local cooperation. Fully met except local interests are to furnish disposal areas for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. There are two bulkhead wharves on Chester River section. Facilities on the Kent Island Narrows section of the existing project consist of about 10,000 linear feet of timber pile bulkheaded wharf. About 1,350 linear feet of the wharf is owned and operated by the Queen Anne's County; the remainder is privately owned. The privately owned bulkheaded wharf is operated mostly by the seven marinas located on the Narrows with the remainder being owned and operated 4-4 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT by the seafood packing houses in the area. In addition to the slips of the marinas, there are marine railways, launching ramps, and travel-lifts. All of these facilities are in good condition and are located adjacent to the proposed improvements. In Wells Cove there is a small wharf, a small marine railway, and a public landing. All facilities are privately owned except the public landing on Wells Cove. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Anticipated dredging was deferred due to minimal shoaling in the channel. 4. CRISFIELD HARBOR, MD Location. Along western limits of the town of Crisfield on east bank of Little Annemessex River, an estuary of Tangier Sound on east side of Chesapeake Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Previous project. For details see page 279 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water, 425 feet wide from the 12-foot depth curve in Tangier Sound to Somers Cove Light, thence 266 feet wide to the bend about 1,800 feet southwest of railroad pier, and thence of irregular width to a point opposite Consumers Ice Co.; a spur channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the ice plant to Hop Point; a channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide from the 7-foot depth curve in Little Annemessex River via Cedar Creek, a landcut, and Daugherty Creek Canal to Big Annemessex River; a mooring basin 7 feet deep, 160 feet wide and about 875 feet long roughly parallel to Brick Kiln Road, with a channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide leading therefrom to 7-foot project channel connecting Little Annemessex and Big Annemessex Rivers; and an anchorage basin in Somers Cove 10 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long, with an approach channel 10 feet deep and 60 feet wide from the 10-foot depth curve in Little Annemessex River through the present entrance to Somers Cove. Mean range of tide at Crisfield is about 1.9 feet. Local cooperation. Local interests furnished disposal areas for future maintenance dredging. Terminal facilities. Waterfront of Crisfield Harbor is built up principally with solid-bulkhead wharves and pile-and-timber piers. Most wharves are privately owned, but are open to the public for transaction of business with the owners. Few of the terminals have mechanical freight-handling devices, but most of the freight is transferred by hand. There are three boatrepair yards with marine railways having capacities up to 250 tons. Existing terminals are adequate for present and reasonably prospective commerce. Sufficient areas are available north of Hop Point and on Somers Cove for construction of additional terminals as needed. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished for future maintenance dredging. 5. FISHING BAY, MD Location. McCready's, Goose, and Farm Creeks are small tidal estuaries of Fishing Bay, a large estuary at head of Tangier Sound. Fishing Bay is connected by Hooper Strait with Chesapeake Bay to the west about 15 miles above mouth of Potomac River. Goose Creek enters the bay about 3.5 miles above the mouth. Farm Creek enters Fishing Bay about 6 miles above the mouth and approximately opposite mouth of McCready's Creek. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Existing project. Provides for channels 6 feet deep and generally 60 feet wide at mean low water, suitably widened where necessary to offer adequate sheltered anchorage space from deep water in Fishing Bay to vicinity of county or packing house wharves in McCready's, Farm, and Goose Creeks. Mean range of tide is about 2 feet. Terminal facilities. A public wharf built with aid of Federal funds is on McCready's Creek about 200 feet above the mouth. There is a privately owned pile-andtimber pier about 1,500 feet above the mouth of Goose Creek. There are two privately owned wharves on Farm Creek and a public wharf owned by Dorchester County. Private wharves on each of the waterways are open to the public for transaction of business with the owners. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging contract was completed on October 6, 1997. A total of 23,874 cubic yards were removed from McCready's Creek and a total of 30,692 cubic yards were removed from Farm Creek. Approximately 20,000 cubic yards of material from McCready's Creek was beneficially placed along an eroding shoreline adjoining Wharf Road. A total of three geotextile tubes measuring 100 feet each were filled with dredged material to serve as offshore breakwaters on the windward edge of the marsh creation. A 1/2 acre marsh was planted in 1998. 6. FISHING CREEK, MD Location. A narrow winding tidal stream which enters Chesapeake Bay from the west 56 miles south of Baltimore and about 26 miles south of Annapolis, MD. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12266.) Existing project. A channel 7 feet deep with widths of 100 and 60 feet from deep water in the Chesapeake Bay to an anchorage of same depth, 120 feet wide and 400 feet long, located in marsh 500 feet above mouth of creek, and twin stone jetties at entrance; north jetty is about 1,050 feet long, and south jetty about 1,100 feet long. The mean range of tide is about 1 foot. Cost of new work for the completed project was $111,242. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except that local interests are to furnish disposal areas as needed for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. Seven hundred feet of bulkhead wharf are available on the south side of the entrance 4-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 channel running west from bay shore, and the U.S. Navy Department constructed a pile-and-timber wharf on west side of basin. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The fiscal year 1997 contract was closed out. 7. HERRING BAY AND ROCKHOLD CREEK, MD Location. Herring Bay is a wide-mouthed indentation on the west side of Chesapeake Bay about 20 miles below Annapolis, MD. It is about 3 miles long from north to south and penetrates the shore for a depth of about 1 mile. Rockhold Creek, which is about 2.5 miles long, is an estuary which extends northward from the northerly end of Herring Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1225.) Existing project. Provides for channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide from 7-foot contour in Herring Bay to vicinity of county wharf on Rockhold Creek, with turning basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 150 feet long at head of channel, and a stone breakwater approximately 900 feet long east of entrance channel. Mean range of tide is about 1.5 feet and extreme tidal range about 4 feet. The Federal cost of new work for completed project was $50,591. Local cooperation. Fully met except local interests are to furnish disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. Consists of a public wharf on Rockhold Creek about 600 feet below the county bridge, open to all, together with a few private landing stages. No freight-handling devices are installed on any of the wharves which are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: None. 8. HERRING CREEK TALL TIMBERS, MD Location. Herring Creek in St. Mary's County, MD, is a small tidal stream 1 3/4 miles in length which flows in a westerly direction and enters the north bank of the Potomac River 16 miles upstream of its mouth at Chesapeake Bay and 92 miles downstream from Washington, DC (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 557.) Existing project. This provides for an entrance channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide, and approximately 1,630 feet long extending from deep water in the Potomac River to deep water within the creek, a turning basin of irregular shape 6 feet deep adjacent to the proposed public wharf, and riprap-stone jetties on the upstream and downstream sides of the entrance channel 770 and 650 feet long, respectively. The plane of reference is mean low water. The tidal ranges are: Mean, 1.6 feet; irregular, 1.9 feet; and extreme, approximately 7 feet. The project was modified in 1986 under Section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968. The modification consists of constructing 250 feet of beachfill, 2,187 linear feet of stone revetment and upgrading 350 linear feet of existing revetment along the Tall Timbers waterfront south of the project inlet to preclude shoreline erosion induced by the project jetties. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) includes the following provisions: 1. Compliance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisitions Policies Act of 1970. 2. Provide without cost to the United States, when and as required all lands, easements, rights-of-way and soildisposal areas necessary for the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project. 3. Hold and save the United States free from damages to other property resulting from the improvement. Terminal facilities. There are a number of small wharves and landings within the creek, all privately owned. The facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Report of study recommending modification to existing project through the placement of the beachfill section with a stone revetment was completed. 9. HONGA RIVER AND TAR BAY, MD Location. Honga River is a tidal estuary of Chesapeake Bay and penetrates Dorchester County on Eastern Shore of Maryland between Hooper Island and the mainland; Tar Bay lies between Barren Island and the mainland and Hooper Island. Fishing Creek connects Tar Bay and Honga River. Back Creek is a branch of Honga River extending into Hooper Island; the mouth is about 2 miles south of Fishing Creek. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep at mean low water from the 7-foot contour in Chesapeake Bay, through Tar Bay and Fishing Creek to the 7-foot contour in Honga River, 25,300 feet long, and a channel in Back Creek 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide from the 7-foot depth curve in Honga River to a point near the head of Back Creek with a turning basin of the same depth 150 feet long and 200 feet wide at the head of channel, about 5,500 feet long. Mean range of tide is about 1.4 feet. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $66,119. Local cooperation. Local interests furnished placement areas for future maintenance dredging. Terminal facilities. Numerous small private wharves are scattered along Fishing Creek and Back Creek. A public wharf is on Fishing Creek. A public wharf, four 4-6 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT oyster houses, and a marine railway are on Back Creek. Facilities are adequate for existing and reasonable prospective commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was awarded on September 11, 1998 to remove 111,000 cubic yards of material. Contractor defaulted and Bonding Company assumed takeover. 10. LOWER THOROFARE, DEAL ISLAND, MD Location. This is a tidal waterway, about 1.5 miles long and from one-eighth to one-half mile wide, branching off from Tangier Sound between Deal Island and Little Deal Island, MD. It is about 12 miles north of Crisfield Harbor, MD. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 78.) Previous project. The original project was dated March 3, 1881. For further details see page 1790 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from that depth in Tangier Sound to and including a mooring basin of the same depth, 100 feet wide and 300 feet long, in the marsh at the head of the cove at Wenona. The cost for new work for the completed project was $39,658, exclusive of amounts expended under previous projects. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests are required to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. There are three packing-house wharves and a small marine railway above the head of the project channel at Wenona. The facilities are privately owned but are open to the public for transaction of business with the owners. Present facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Sufficient areas are available for the construction of additional terminals when and as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished for future maintenance dredging. 11. NEABSCO CREEK, VA Location. A tidal estuary approximately three miles long, enters the west side of the Potomac River about 83 miles above its mouth and about 27 miles south of Washington, D.C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 560.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 5 feet deep and 50 feet wide from the Potomac River to the anchorage basin. The project was classified as inactive for many years. On September 2, 1966, Chief of Engineers reclassified the following portion from the inactive to the active category; a channel 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep, from the Potomac River to the Richmond, Fredericksburg, and Potomac Railroad Bridge over Neabsco Creek and a channel upstream from the railroad bridge 60 feet wide and 6 feet deep to an anchorage basin of the same depth 140 feet wide and 150 feet long. On January 3, 1978, the Chief of Engineers reclassified this portion of the project to inactive category as local cooperation was lacking. The 1986 Water Resource Development Act deauthorized the unconstructed 7 foot channel from the Potomac River to the Upper Landing. Local cooperation. The local interests must provide a suitable placement site for future maintenance dredging. Terminal Facilities. There are numerous privately owned piers along the waterway open to the public. Several repair facilities provide services to navigational interests. Operation and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A dredging contract was completed on February 13, 1998. A total of 28,642 cubic yards of material was removed at a cost of $520,565. 12. NORTHEAST RIVER, MD Location. A tidal waterway extending southwestward 5.5 miles from the junction of its branches in the town of North East to the head of Chesapeake Bay, 6 miles north of entrance to the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1226.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep at mean low water from that depth in river to foot of Church Street in the town of North East, enlarged at its upper end to form a basin 120 feet wide and 300 feet long. Mean range of tide is 2.25 feet. Local cooperation. Fully met except that local interests are to furnish disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Terminal facilities. There are a few lightly constructed landings for small boats scattered along the waterfront in the town of North East. There are two fish-packing plants, two marine railways, several bulkhead wharves, 11 marinas, and a number of small boathouses along the length of the waterway. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with the proposed maintenance dredging. 13. OCEAN CITY HARBOR AND INLET AND SINEPUXENT BAY, MD Location. Ocean City is on a barrier island between Sinepuxent Bay and Atlantic Ocean about 35 miles south of entrance to Delaware Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12211.) 4-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Existing project. This provides for an inlet channel 200 feet wide and 10 feet deep through the inlet to the channel in the Isle of Wight Bay, protected on the south side by a stone jetty with a top elevation of 8.8 feet above mean low water and a top width of 18 feet, and on the north side by a stone jetty with a top elevation of 9 feet above mean low water and a top width of generally 20 feet, thence generally 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep to the project harbor; a channel 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide in Sinepuxent Bay from the inlet to Green Point, and thence 100 feet wide in Chincoteague Bay; and for a channel 6 feet deep and 125 feet wide from the inlet channel to a point opposite North Eighth Street in Ocean City, thence 75 feet wide into the Isle of Wight Bay. The modification authorized by the 1954 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in December 1989. This work included 16- and 14-foot depth channels with widths from 300 to 100 feet from the Atlantic Ocean to the head of the harbor. Depths in the inlet channel and harbor refer to project datum. Depths in the bay channels refer to mean low water. The elevation of mean low water in the bays above mean low water in the ocean at Ocean City varies from about 0.8 foot in the vicinity of the inlet to 1.7 feet at their heads. The mean range of ocean tide is 3.4 feet. The extreme range is from 3 feet below mean low water to about 3.5 feet above mean high water, a total of 9.9 feet. In the bays the mean range of tide varies from approximately 2.5 feet at the inlet to 0.3 foot at their heads. Greater fluctuations are caused by prolonged high winds. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $1,190,530, exclusive of $500,000 contributed by local interests and exclusive of $3,700,000 for rehabilitating the south jetty. Local cooperation. Fully met except local interests must furnish disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. On bay side of Ocean City: two storage basins, for pleasure and small commercial craft, and numerous privately owned pile-and-timber piers and bulkhead wharves. At project harbor: a public landing about 1,000 feet long, several privately constructed bulkhead wharves open to the public for transaction of business with the owners, and a boat repair yard with a marine railway capable of handling boats up to about 150 tons. All piers and wharves are accessible by highway. Port facilities have been expanded to include all available space in the Fish Harbor. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design work was accomplished for future maintenance dredging. 14. POTOMAC AND ANACOSTIA RIVERS, DC, COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Project applies to the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, Washington, DC, and their tributaries. Existing project. Collection and removal of drift from the waters of the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tributaries in the Washington area from the head of tidewater to Mount Vernon, VA. Total length of project, considering both sides of the waterway, is about 50 miles. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Section 22 of this text. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations by hired labor consisted of collection and disposal of 397,800 cubic feet of driftwood, ranging from small blocks up to timbers of large dimensions. 15. POTOMAC RIVER AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, MD, VA, AND DC Location. The project is located in the Potomac River and its tributaries with the northern boundary at Chain Bridge in Washington, DC, extending southward to the U.S. Route 301 Bridge (see U.S. Coast and Geodetic Chart 12289). Existing project. On July 2, 1986 the Chief of Engineers under the authority of Section 302 of the 1965 River and Harbor Act, as amended, authorized the control of hydrilla and other nuisance plants using mechanical harvesting to clear a 60-foot wide, 6-foot deep connecting channel from open waters to eligible public use areas. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on June 6, 1986 between the Corps, MD, VA, DC, and Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments. The LCA, which must be reexecuted annually, initially expired on September 30, 1991 and included the following provisions: 1. Local sponsors share 50 percent of the program cost; 2. Local sponsors provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; and 3. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments is responsible for coordinating local interests and issuing work orders for the program. Terminal facilities. There are 75 marina activities between DC and the U.S. Route 50 Bridge providing approximately 3,400 commercial and recreational boat slips and 50 boat ramps. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Hydrilla was harvested in both Maryland and Virginia. Additional sites were added with the plant spreading farther down the river. Shoreline surveys and aerial photography continued to be performed, however funding has been exhausted. Congressional interests obtained funding for fiscal year 1998 work and adequate funds are available to accomplish harvesting in 1999. 16. POTOMAC RIVER AT ALEXANDRIA, VA Location. Alexandria is 3 miles below Washington, DC, on right bank of Potomac River, which flows 4-8 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT southeasterly into Chesapeake Bay 105 miles downstream. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12289. Existing project. Provides for depth of 24 feet in front of Alexandria between the through channel and a line drawn 20 feet outside of established pierhead line. Project area is about 6,700 feet long and averages 300 feet wide. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal ranges are: mean, 2.8 feet; irregular, 4.5 feet; and extreme, 10.6 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $95,215. Existing project was adopted by 1910 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 1253, 60th Cong., 2d sess.). Map is in the project document. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Alexandria has 3 regular shipping wharves or landings. Terminal and transfer facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. 17. POTOMAC RIVER BELOW WASHINGTON, DC Location. Potomac River is formed 21 miles below Cumberland, MD, and flows southeasterly about 285 miles and enters Chesapeake Bay, about 80 miles from Atlantic Ocean. Washington, DC is 108 miles upstream of mouth, and head of tidewater is at mile 117. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 12233, 12286, 12287, 12288, and 12289.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide between the mouth of the river and Giesboro Point at Washington, DC-a distance of 108 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal ranges are: mean, 1.3 feet at mouth, 2.9 feet at Washington; irregular, 2 feet at mouth, 4.5 feet at Washington; extreme, about 6 feet at mouth, 10.7 feet at Washington. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $153,836. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. In general, the improvement is a main river channel, and terminal facilities are only served where the channel runs close to either bank of river. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. 18. PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIONS AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS, MD Location. Project applies to tidal waters of the harbor of Baltimore and its adjacent and tributary waters and to all tidal waters of Chesapeake Bay and in Maryland. Existing project. Patrol and inspection throughout the project location to detect violations of sections 13 and 15 of the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 and to investigate obstructions to navigation pursuant to Federal regulations (33 CFR 209.109). Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations, by Supervisor of Harbor of Baltimore included inspections of approximately 60 Federal navigation channels within the project location to insure channels are not obstructed to general navigation by debris, sunken vessels/wrecks, and fishing appurtenances. There were 53 detailed investigations of obstructions or sunken vessels/wrecks. 19. ROCK HALL HARBOR, MD Location. Shallow, open cove on east side of Chesapeake Bay immediately to the south of Swan Point and. 23 miles southeast of Baltimore, MD. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 548 and 1226.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from 10-foot depth curve in Swan Creek Inlet to a channel of same dimensions, 700 feet long parallel to harbor terminals at Rock Hall; an anchorage basin of the same depth, 100 feet wide, 250 feet long in a northwesterly extension of the channel fronting the harbor terminals; an anchorage basin 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 350 feet long on an extension of the center line of the 10-foot basin; with an anchorage basin 8 feet deep, 200 feet wide and 600 feet long attached to and extending in a southwesterly direction from the west end of above mentioned 8-foot basin; with twin breakwaters at the harbor entrance. On May 29, 1980, the Chief of Engineers under authority provided by Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended, authorized construction of the following work: Raising the existing west and east breakwaters from four feet to seven feet above mean low water and extending the west breakwater 400 feet at an elevation of seven feet above mean low water; relocating the existing entrance channel at a depth of 8 feet and width of 100 feet; a new channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, from the new entrance channel to the existing anchorage basin; a new channel, 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, from the end of the existing channel near the County wharf to and including an anchorage basin, 250 feet square, in the eastern end of the harbor. The total cost for this work is $1,744,518, of which $1,071,718 is Federal cost and $672,800 is required local cash contribution. In addition, local interests contributed $106,600 for the retaining dike, bulkheads, and embankments. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work authorized under River and Harbor Acts of 1937 and 1948, except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. For work authorized by the Chief of Engineers May 29, 1980, local interests must, among other requirements, provide 4-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 without cost to the United States all necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and contribute, in cash 36.9 percent of the first cost and all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $2,000,000, to be paid in a lump sum prior to start of construction, or in installments prior to start of pertinent work items. For details see page 4-9 Annual Report for 1979. Terminal facilities. There are several private terminals: a marine railway, a public timber-pile wharf, and a public bulkhead wharf about 500 feet long. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A dredging contract was completed on March 31, 1998. Approximately 7,965 cubic yards of material was removed at a cost of $220,000. 20. TEDIOUS CREEK, MD Location. Tedious Creek is a small, funnel-shaped estuary located on the eastern shoreline of Maryland's Chesapeake Bay in southern Dorchester County, approximately 75 miles southeast of Baltimore, Maryland. Tedious Creek flows southwesterly (during ebb tide) into Fishing Bay at the head of Tangier Sound and is accessible to the Chesapeake Bay via Hooper Strait to the west. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 12261.) Existing project. The project consists of two shore attached breakwaters. The southern breakwater is 800 feet in length, and the northern breakwater is 680 feet in length. The structures have a central gap between them of 420 feet. The crest elevation of the structures is +6 feet mean lower low water. In addition, 50-foot gaps have been constructed along the midpoint of the structures to improve water circulation in the harbor. Two 50-foot sections of revetment have been constructed along the shoreline at the tie-in of the breakwaters to prevent flanking of the structures by erosion. Material excavated from the foundation of the breakwaters was used to create a marsh habitat adjacent to the Sandy Point shoreline using geotextile tubes. Submerged aquatic vegetation will also be planted in the lee of the north breakwater in Spring of 1998. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation agreement was signed on July 2, 1996, with Dorchester County, MD, which requires the local sponsor to provide all lands, easements, relocations, and rights-of-way necessary for construction of the project; hold and save the U.S. from potential damages; assure public ownership; and provide a 10 percent contribution toward the cost of construction. At the completion of construction, an additional 10 percent contribution must be provided by the local sponsor, however, any credits for lands, easements, relocations, and rights-of-way may be applied against this contribution. Terminal facilities. There are three county wharves on Tedious Creek. In all, there are mooring and offloading facilities for 62 commercial fishing vessels and approximately 25 recreational boats. The existing landings and stagings are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A contract for construction of the breakwaters was awarded September 25, 1996. The construction of the breakwaters is complete. Submerged aquatic vegetation was planted in Spring of 1998. Construction was completed in June 1998. 21. TWITCH COVE AND BIG THOROFARE, MD Location. A tidal waterway about 4 miles long traversing Smith Island, MD, southeasterly from Chesapeake Bay on the west to Tangier Sound on the east. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Existing project. A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 60-feet wide from Twitch Cove on Tangier Sound through Big Thorofare, thence through canal at Ewell, MD, thence through Levering Creek and Big Thorofare to vicinity of Swan Point, thence of same depth and 100 feet wide through offshore bar to deep water in Chesapeake Bay, with twin stone jetties at entrance, north jetty is about 2,080 feet long, and south jetty about 1,800 feet long; and anchorage basin 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 700 feet long connecting with west side of existing project channel at Ewell; extension of existing project channel in Levering Creek, 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long; and a channel 4 feet deep and 25 feet wide around point between Big Thorofare and Tylers River. Mean range of tide is 1.7 feet, and extreme tidal range is 3 feet. Federal cost of new work for completed project was $193,175. Local cooperation. Fully complied with, except that local interests are to furnish placement sites for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. Numerous privately owned pileand- timber wharves and bulkheads at Ewell are open to the public for business transactions with the owners. A county wharf is also at west end of town. Five crab houses are on Levering Creek, and one oyster house on project waterway west of Town of Ewell. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract was awarded on April 2, 1998 for the repair of the twin jetties. Both jetties will be reconnected to shore and the north jetty will be sandtightened. The south jetty will be repaired to restore the crest to a 3.5' MLLW elevation. Repair work will be completed in fiscal year 1999. 22. WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC Location. Within the District of Columbia at junction of the Anacostia River with the Potomac River which flows southeasterly 108 miles to the Chesapeake Bay. It 4-10 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT is southerly 202 miles by water from Baltimore, MD, and northerly 195 miles from Norfolk, VA. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12289.) Existing projects. The Washington Harbor project provides for a channel in the Potomac River from Giesboro Point to Key Bridge, a second channel from Giesboro Point to the end of Washington Channel, and a third channel from the mouth of the Anacostia River to the foot of 15th Street, SE, with turning basins opposite the Naval Weapons Plant (800 feet wide and 2,400 feet long) and at the head of the Anacostia Channel (400 feet square). Channel dimensions are 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide except upstream from Anacostia Bridge where the width is reduced to 200 feet and from Giesboro Point to a point 3,000 feet downstream of Arlington Memorial Bridge and above Easby Point where channel dimensions are 20 feet deep and 200 feet wide. Channel lengths including turning basins are: Virginia Channel, 5,000 feet; Washington Channel, 10,000 feet; and Anacostia River, 15,000 feet; and operation and maintenance of the inlet gates and lock and the outlet gates of the Tidal Basin constructed under a previous project to flush Washington Channel. Plane of reference is lowwater datum which is .35 foot below mean low tide as observed from 1932 to 1942. Tidal ranges are: mean, 2.9 feet; irregular, 4.5 feet; and extreme, 10.7 feet. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $162,006. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are four wharves generally of bulkhead type on Virginia Channel that are privately owned and not open to the public except by special arrangement. On Washington Channel there are four piers under jurisdiction of District of Columbia, two of which are open to the public and one open to the public by special arrangement. In Anacostia River there are four privately owned piers and eight governmental piers and slips. None of the piers is open to the public except by special arrangement. Terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The tidal basin gates were inspected and maintained by hired labor. 23. WICOMICO RIVER, MD Location. Wicomico River has its source in northern part of Wicomico County, MD, and flows generally southwardly emptying into Monie Bay, a tributary of Tangier Sound on the east side of Chesapeake Bay about 85 miles southeast of Baltimore. Webster Cove is the site of an improved small-boat harbor on southeast bank of Wicomico River about 3 miles above the mouth. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 567 and 1224.) Existing project. Channel 14 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Chesapeake Bay to Salisbury, about 37 miles long, including about 12 miles from the mouth of river to Chesapeake Bay; 14 feet deep in channels and turning basins in north and south prongs with channel widths of 100 feet, and a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide extending from 6-foot contour in Wicomico River to and including a basin in Webster Cove of the same depth, 100 feet wide and 400 feet long; and extension of basin 200 feet long and 100 feet wide on each side. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet, and extreme tidal range is 4.4 feet. Cost of new work for the completed project was $421,609, exclusive of amounts expended on the previous project. Local cooperation. Fully met, except that local interests are to furnish disposal areas for future maintenance as needed and hold the United States free from such damages as may occur to public or leased oyster beds. Terminal facilities. Present waterfront at Salisbury consists of pile-and-timber bulkheads with earthfills. Some wharves have warehouses and factories with mechanical freight-handling facilities and rail sidings. All terminals are privately owned. A shipyard, with two marine railways with capacities of 1,200 and 500 tons, respectively, is on right bank of river below prongs. Areas for development of new terminals on north prong are limited. Areas for considerable expansion of terminal facilities are available on main river. There is a pile-and-timber wharf about 4 miles above mouth of river at Mount Vernon. A wharf of similar construction is at White Haven. There is a county wharf at head of basin in Webster Cove, a pile-and-timber pier at oyster house on southwest side of basin, a T-shaped pile-andtimber pier at cafe on southwest side of basin and several small timber piers on walkways that local interests constructed around the basin. Fueling facilities are available at the T-shaped pier. Sufficient areas are available for construction of additional facilities when required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished for future maintenance dredging. 24. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 4-H at end of chapter.) 25. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Fiscal year costs were $71,736 for Neale Sound, MD; $105,068 for Coan River, VA; $80 for Deal Island Harbor, Somerset, MD; $10 for Kent Narrows, MD; $34,717 for Rockhold Creek, MD; $5,136 for Section 107 Coordination; and $69,110 for Shallow Creek Spur Channel, MD; $1,180 for Webster's Cove, Somerset County, MD. 4-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Non-Federal contributed costs for the fiscal year were $70,325 for Coan River, VA; $232,183 for Webster's Cove, Somerset County, MD. BEACH EROSION CONTROL 26. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach Erosion Control pursuant to Sec. 103 of Public Law 727, as amended (preauthorization). None. 27. ATLANTIC COAST OF MARYLAND Location. The project is located on Fenwick Island at Ocean City, MD, which is about 35 miles south of the entrance to Delaware Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1220.) Existing project. The 50-year project life. The current estimated total project cost is $500,000,000 (including a future inflation allowance through the project completion) which includes $44,881,000 for initial construction and $455,119,000 for periodic nourishment. Local cooperation. The State of Maryland is the project sponsor and the Local Cooperation Agreement was executed March 30, 1990. The sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges and other facilities; pay 35% of the first costs and 47% of periodic nourishment costs; and bear all costs of operation maintenance, replacement and major rehabilitation of storm damage reduction facilities. To date the sponsor has fully met these requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Work was completed on beach restoration and beach monitoring continued throughout the fiscal year. FLOOD CONTROL 28. BROAD TOP REGION, PA Location. The project is located in South Central Pennsylvania, and includes portions of Bedford, Fulton, and Huntingdon Counties. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets Saltillo, PA, and Saxton, PA.) Existing project. Section 304 of the water resources development Act of 1992, as amended provides for a pilot project to develop and carry out a watershed reclamation and protection, and wetlands creation and restoration project using innovative reclamation technologies for the purposes of restoring, maintaining and protecting surface and ground water, including municipal water supplies, from adverse impacts related to acid mine drainage and other runoff. A Master Plan, prepared at a cost of $400,000 identified many potential projects in the Broad Top Region. The Wood-Broad Top-Wells Water Supply and Environmental Restoration project was developed as the initial pilot project. The project consists of two components-replacement and upgrade of the Water Supply System for the villages of Wood and Robertsdale and the restoration of abandoned mine sites at Rocky Ridge South and Defiance North. The current estimated total project cost is $6,975,000, which includes a future inflation allowance through project completion. Federal funds allocated for the project are $5,000,000. Local cooperation. The Wood-Broad Top-Wells Joint Municipal Authority is the non-Federal sponsor for the project. The local sponsor is required to provide 25% of the cost of the project, including lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, replacement, repair and rehabilitation of the project after construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction was initiated for the water supply and Rocky Ridge South components of the project utilizing three separate contracts by the Corps, non- Federal sponsor, and PA Bureau of Abandoned Mine Reclamation. 29. CUMBERLAND, MD, AND RIDGELEY, WV Location. On the North Branch of the Potomac River, 21 miles upstream from its junction with the South Branch of the Potomac River and 197 miles upstream from Washington, DC. (See Geological Survey Quadrangles, Frostburg and Flintstone, MD, WV, and PA.) Existing project. Channel improvements on the North Branch of Potomac River from the Western Maryland Railway bridge in South Cumberland upstream to the mouth of Wills Creek, with levees and fill along the left bank and levees along the right bank from downstream corporate limits of Ridgeley, WV, to a point about 150 feet above Johnson Street Bridge; channel improvements along Wills Creek from its mouth upstream to a point in the Narrows about 500 feet upstream from the highway bridge on U.S. Highway 40; levee and flood wall in West Cumberland, MD, on the left bank of the North Branch of the Potomac River from the mouth of Wills Creek upstream to Kelly Boulevard; levee and flood wall in Ridgeley, WV, on the right bank of the North Branch of the Potomac River from Carpenter Avenue upstream to Patapsco Street near the upstream corporate limits of Ridgeley, WV; interior drainage facilities in Cumberland and West Cumberland, MD, and Ridgeley, WV; removal of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal dam and construction of a 4-12 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT new industrial dam on the North Branch of the Potomac River immediately above mouth of Wills Creek; and alteration and reconstruction of highway and railroad bridges. Federal cost of new work for the completed project is $15,633,970, which includes $49,998 emergency relief funds and is exclusive of $197,513 public works acceleration funds. Estimated cost to local interests is $2,900,000 of which $1,402,001 is contributed funds and $1,497,999 is for lands and damages. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 30. JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD AND WV Location. Project is located on the North Branch Potomac River on the state line between Garrett County, MD, and Mineral County, WV. The damsite is located approximately 7.9 miles upstream from the confluence with Savage River at Bloomington, MD. It is also about 5 air miles southwest of the tritowns of Luke and Westernport, MD, and Piedmont, WV. (See Geological Survey quadrangle sheets, Kitzmiller and Westernport, MD.) Existing project. The improvement consists of a rolled earth and rock fill dam with an impervious core and an 800-foot long dike on the left bank. Top of dam is 296 feet above streambed with a total length of 2,130 feet. When filled to spillway crest, the reservoir will extend about 6.6 miles upstream and inundate 965 acres. Flood control storage of 36,200 acre-feet is provided. Storage available for low flow augmentation for water supply and water quality improvement is 92,000 acre-feet. The reservoir controls a drainage area of 263 square miles. Recreation facilities are provided for picnicking, camping and boating. Final project cost is $176,325,300. Local cooperation. See page 4-15 of the 1977 Annual Report for requirements. A water supply contract between the Federal Government and the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission in concert with the Fairfax County Water Authority, VA, and the District of Columbia was executed for repayment of all water supply costs. The first of 50 annual payments began in July 1981. Federally approved water quality standards put into effect by Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia are considered satisfactory assurances of intent to control pollution. Satisfactory assurances have been received from Maryland, West Virginia, and Virginia that they will protect downstream channels from encroachment that would adversely affect operation of the project. Local interests operate a white water access area below the dam. The State of Maryland has constructed a recreation area on the Maryland side of the lake. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Damages caused by high water at Howell Run Boat Launch Recreation area was repaired by an 8A minority contractor. Repairs included replacement of drainage structure, streambank stabilization, and parking lot repair. The same contract was used to repair damage caused by a large road slide at the Maryland Overlook, and to provide potable water for the Howell Run Picnic area. 31. LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PA Flood Control Act of 1962 authorized construction of Aylesworth Creek Lake, Fall Brook Lake, and local protection works on Lackawanna River at Scranton, PA, substantially as recommended by the Chief of Engineers (S. Doc. 141, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.). The Basin includes an area of 346 square miles in northeastern Pennsylvania. 31A. AYLESWORTH CREEK LAKE, PA Location. Project is located in Lackawanna County on Aylesworth Creek about one mile above its confluence with the Lackawanna River, near the community of East Jermyn, PA. Existing project. Provides for an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 90 feet above streambed and a top length of 1,200 feet. The spillway located adjacent to the left abutment is an open cut channel 80 feet wide with a concrete sill. The outlet works consist of a 3-foot diameter uncontrolled conduit. Project controls a drainage area of 6.2 square miles and provides flood control storage of 1,700 acre-feet equivalent to 5.1 inches of runoff from the drainage areas. The lake will extend about 4,600 feet and inundate 87 acres when filled to spillway crest. Recreation facilities constructed by local interests include a bathing beach, bathhouse, and picnic area. Federal cost of new work was $2,268,200 of which $2,153,559 was for construction and $114,641 for lands and damages. In addition $52,200 Federal and $52,200 non-Federal funds were expended for construction of bathhouse facilities under the recreation facilities for completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. The Aylesworth Creek Reservoir Park Authority, representing the Boroughs of Archbald and Jermyn, operate and maintain limited day use facilities including a small beach. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 32. LOCK HAVEN, PA Location. On the West Branch Susquehanna River in the City of Lock Haven, PA, about 194 miles above the 4-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 mouth of the Susquehanna River in Clinton County, PA. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Lock Haven and Mile Hall, PA.) Existing project. Provides for 36,600 feet of levee and 1,000 feet of concrete floodwall along the West Branch and Bald Eagle Creek, five closure structures, five ponding areas, a sanitary pumping station, 35 gravity type drainage structures, necessary road and utility relocations, non-structural measures for Woodward and Allison Townships, and minor recreation facilities. The current estimated total project cost is $84,000,000. Local cooperation. The Lock Haven Area Flood Protection Authority, a municipal authority created by the City of Lock Haven and Woodward Township, is the sponsor for the project. The Local Cooperation Agreement was signed March 14, 1991. The local sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements, rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities, pay 5% of structural flood control costs during construction; pay 50% of separable recreation costs; and bear all operation maintenance and replacement costs for the project after construction. To date the sponsor has fully met these requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Work continued on construction of swim beach and on fiscal close-out of the project. 33. MOOREFIELD, WV Location. Moorefield, WV, is located at the junction of the South Fork (Moorefield River) of the South Branch of the Potomac River, 57 miles upstream from the mouth of the South Branch of the Potomac River, and 233 miles upstream from Washington, DC. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Moorefield, WV). Existing project. Provides for a flood warning system, 21,600 feet of earth levee, 1,360 linear feet of floodwall, highway bridge replacement of one span of a railroad bridge, environmental mitigation, and appurtenant project features such as ramps, closures, riprap, relocations, and ponding areas for local drainage. The current estimated total project cost is $26,200,000 which includes a future inflation allowance through project completion. Local cooperation. The Town of Moorefield is the sponsor for the project. The Project Cooperation Agreement was signed May 12, 1994. The local sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements, rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities; pay 5% of the cost allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities after construction. (The cash contribution is deemed satisfied in consideration of the transfer of Grandview State Park to the Federal Government.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The project was turned over to the town of Moorefield in February,1998 and a follow-on contract for miscellaneous items was awarded in July 1998, and is to be completed in November 1998. 34. LACKAWANNA RIVER, OLYPHANT, PA Location. The project is located along the Lackawanna River in the northeastern portion of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in Lackawanna County. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Olyphant, PA.) Existing project. Provides for 3,800 feet of earth levee, 1,400 feet of concrete floodwall, a closure structure, interior drainage facilities, 1,500 feet of gabion slope protection and associated cultural mitigation and environmental restoration. The current estimated total project cost is $15,400,000 which includes a future inflation allowance through project completion. Local cooperation. The Borough of Olyphant is the sponsor for the project. The local sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities; pay 5% of the costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities after construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The project cooperation agreement was signed on August 26, 1998. The Borough of Olyphant initiated title searches and surveying in preparation for upcoming real estate acquisitions. Engineering and design continued. The overall project is scheduled for completion in September 2001. 35. PAXTON CREEK, HARRISBURG, PA Location. Harrisburg is located in Dauphin County, PA, on the eastern bank of the Susquehanna River. Paxton Creek, a tributary of the Susquehanna River, flows southwesterly through the City. Existing project. On June 16, 1993 the Director of Civil Works under continuing authority of Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 as amended, authorized construction of an improved flood warning system for Paxton Creek in Harrisburg, PA. The project included the installation of a base station (comprised of antennae, receiver/decoder, personal computer, and appurtenant equipment) within Dauphin County, the utilization of a flood warning dissemination service, a flood forecast model, the installation of an additional rain gauge, and the installation of solar panels on two existing rain gauges and one existing stream gauge. The improved system provides the City of Harrisburg with 4-14 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT greater access to real time precipitation and stream data, a flood forecast capability, improved flood warning dissemination, and greater system reliability. Local cooperation. The July 19, 1993 Local Cooperation Agreement between Baltimore District and the City of Harrisburg, in brief, required the local sponsor to provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold and save the U.S. from damages; operate, maintain, repair, replace, and rehabilitate the completed project in accordance with regulations or directions prescribed by the Government; contribute 25% of the total project costs; participate in and comply with applicable Federal flood plain management and flood insurance programs; and develop and adopt a comprehensive, detailed plan for use in conjunction with the flood warning system. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A contract modification to continue providing a flood warning dissemination service continued. 36. PETERSBURG, WV Location. On the South Branch of the Potomac River in eastern Grant County, WV. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Petersburg, East, WV; Petersburg, West, WV; Maysville, WV; and Rig, WV.). Existing project. Provides for 18,460 feet of levee and 900 feet of concrete floodwall along the South Branch, raising of U.S. Route 220 highway bridge, 61,000 cubic yards of channel excavation, ramps, closures, slope protection, relocations, ponding areas for interior drainage, and flood warning system improvements. The current estimated total project cost is $26,600,000 which includes a future inflation allowance through project completion. Local cooperation. Grant County is the sponsor for the project. The Project Cooperation Agreement was signed July 13, 1993. The local sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities; pay 5% of the cost allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities after construction. (The cash contribution is deemed satisfied in consideration of the transfer of Grandview State Park to the Federal Government.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The levee construction contract was awarded November 6, 1995, and is complete. The project was turned over to Grant County in November 1997. A follow- on contract for miscellaneous items was awarded and is to be completed in November 1998. 37. RAYSTOWN LAKE, RAYSTOWN BRANCH, JUNIATA RIVER, PA Location. Dam site is on Raystown Branch, about 5.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Juniata River. Project is about 10 miles south of Huntingdon, PA. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Huntingdon, Mt. Union, Broad Top and Everett, PA.) Existing project. The rock and earthfill dam rises 225 feet above streambed with a gated concrete spillway and auxiliary spillway in the right abutment. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 762,000 acre-feet, of which 248,000 acre-feet are for flood control, 476,000 acre-feet for recreation and water quality control, and the balance for sediment reserve. At full flood control pool elevation, the reservoir would inundate 10,800 acres and extend 34 miles upstream. Recreation facilities are provided for boating, fishing, camping, swimming, hunting, hiking, and picnicking. Federal cost for new work was $77,408,700 of which $46,120,931 was for construction and $31,287,769 was for lands and damages including relocations. Construction of a private hydroelectric plant at Raystown Lake was completed May 1988. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Construction of a multi-purpose building in the Seven Points Recreation area began in August 1997 and is to be completed in December 1998. The fiscal year 1998 Appropriations Act included an additional $2,160,000 to continue to implement the updated water plan and for normal operation and maintenance of the project. The main improvement is to construct a campground near member 8. This is scheduled to be completed in May 1999. 38. LACKAWANNA RIVER, SCRANTON, PA Location. The project is located along the Lackawanna River in the northeastern portion of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in Lackawanna County. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Scranton, PA.) Existing project. Provides for 5,800 feet of earth levee, 1,700 feet of concrete floodwall, 3 closure structures, interior drainage facilities, 2,700 feet of gabion slope protection, an improved flood warning system, removal of a railroad bridge, access ramps, and associated cultural mitigation. The current estimated total project cost is $20,700,000 which includes a future inflation allowance through project completion. Local cooperation. The City of Scranton is the sponsor for the project. The local sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities; pay 5% of the cost allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities after construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design continued and a Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on May 22, 1998. 4-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 The overall project is scheduled for completion in September 2001. 39. SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Location. The south central Pennsylvania area includes twenty-one counties defined by the authorizing legislation. The program area within the Baltimore District consists of the Chesapeake Bay watershed portion of the program area including Bedford, Blair, Clearfield, Franklin, Fulton, Huntingdon, Juniata, Lackawanna, Lycoming, Mifflin, Susquehanna, Snyder, and Wyoming Counties. Existing project. Section 313 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992, as amended, established a pilot program for providing environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in south central Pennsylvania. Such assistance may be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-related environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development projects, including projects for waste water treatment and related facilities, water supply, storage treatment, distribution facilities, and surface water resource protection and development. The Federal share may be provided in the form of grants or reimbursements to the sponsor. Section 313 as amended authorizes Federal appropriations of $80 million to carry out the program, including $40 million within the Chesapeake Bay watershed area. From FY94 through FY98, Congress has added $29,100,000 to the Corps budget for a Master Plan and fifteen identified projects in the Baltimore District as follows: Master Plan $600,000, Mill Run water treatment plant $4,500,000, Broad Top/Coaldale wastewater management and Environmental Restoration $1,750,000, Chestnut Ridge wastewater management $5,250,000, Hyndman Flood Control $1,000,000, Guilford waste water management $330,000, Blair County Airport waste water management $320,000. Local cooperation. The non-Federal sponsors are required to provide 25% of project costs including lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, replacement, repair and rehabilitation of the project after construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Broad Top/Coaldale-sponsor construction of Kearney completed; Langdondale, on lots, and North Langdondale construction ongoing. Chestnut Ridge, Greenfield-Project Cooperation Agreement and sponsor financing for construction under development. Lycoming County (Armstrong Township)-Project Cooperation Agreement for design signed August 1998. Hollidaysburg and Northern Blair County-Project Cooperation Agreement and financing for design under development. Blair County Airport, Guilford, Hyndman, Old Lycoming Township, Olyphant Scott Township, Taylor Township and Thompson Boroughsponsors defining projects. 40. SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Authorized plan provides for construction of reservoirs and related flood control works for protection of towns in New York and Pennsylvania. The improvements are located in the upper watershed of the Susquehanna River to and including the Chemung River. 40A. ADDISON, NY Location. At confluence of Tuscarora Creek and Canisteo River in the City of Addison, NY. (See Geological Survey map for Addison, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of about 3,100 feet of earth levee and 700 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Canisteo River, extending from high ground on Steuben Street near the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad to the mouth of Tuscarora Creek; removal of existing dam, mill, and raceway from the channel; construction of about 2,200 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Tuscarora Creek, extending from Tuscarora Street to Canisteo River; construction of 4,600 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Tuscarora Creek, extending from high ground at the southwest edge of the village to high ground at the southeast edge of the village; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 40B. ALMOND LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located two miles upstream from Hornell, NY, on Canacadea Creek, a tributary of the Canisteo River. (See Geological Survey map for Homell, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 1,260 feet long rising 90 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and a gated outlet conduit in the left abutment. The outlet works consist of three 5-foot by 10-foot service gates and three emergency gates of the same size. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 14,640 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 56 square miles, 36 percent of the watershed of the Canisteo River upstream from Hornell, NY. Recreation facilities include a boat-launching ramp and dock, bathing beach, picnic area, and tent and trailer camping area. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests have developed recreational facilities at the lake in conjunction with the Federal Government. These facilities are operated and maintained by the Steuben County Board of Supervisors. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 4-16 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 40C. ARKPORT DAM, NY Location. Dam is located five miles upstream from Hornell, NY, on the Canisteo River, a tributary of the Chemung River which flows into the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Arkport, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 1,200 feet long, exclusive of spillway, rises 113 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and an ungated outlet in the right abutment. The outlet structure consists of an 8-foot diameter reinforced concrete lined conduit, 660 feet long. A cast iron nozzle is placed in the lower end of the conduit, reducing the outlet size to 4 feet 4 inches. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 7,950 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 31 square miles, 20 percent of the watershed of the Canisteo River upstream from Hornell. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 40D. AVOCA, NY Location. On the Cohocton River at the Village of Avoca, NY, about 30 miles Upstream from the confluence of the Cohocton and Chemung Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Avoca, NY.) Existing project. Provides for improvement and realignment of about 8,300 feet of Cohocton River channel, extending from above the Erie Railroad to below the junction of Main Street and U.S. Highway 15; construction of about 8,500 feet of earth levee on left bank of the Cohocton River, extending from high ground above Alexander Avenue to about 1,300 feet below the junction of Main Street and U.S. Highway 15; and 4,500 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Salmon Creek, extending from high ground above Alexander Avenue to the Erie Railroad; a new highway bridge for U.S. Highway 15 over Cohocton River, raising of the Erie Railroad bridge 4 feet; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 40E. BINGHAMTON, NY Location. At the confluence of the Chenango and Susquehanna Rivers in the City of Binghamton, NY. (See Geological Survey map for Binghamton, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of earth levees, concrete flood walls, and appurtenant drainage structures, consisting of about 850 feet of channel excavation and about 1,375 feet of earth levee along Phelps Creek, Town of Port Dickinson; new concrete wall on the right bank of the Chenango River, extending downstream from high ground near the city limits to an existing flood wall below DeForest Street, a distance of about 520 feet; about 150 feet of concrete wall just below Cutler Dam; about 180 feet of concrete wall at the pumphouse near McDonald Avenue; raising existing earth levees on the right bank of Chenango River, extending from Cutler Dam downstream for about 1,220 feet; about 2,915 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Chenango River north of the city limits in the Village of Port Dickinson, extending from Church Street to high ground just north of the city line; about 3,900 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Chenango River, extending from DeForest Street to Cutler Dam; new concrete flood walls and riverbank revetment for about 5,570 feet extending on the left bank of Chenango River from Cutler Dam to the junction with the Susquehanna River; about 540 feet of new concrete flood wall and raising about 1,085 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Susquehanna River, extending from the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad downstream to Tompkins Street Bridge; about 1,940 feet of earth levee; about 1,940 feet of concrete flood wall and capping about 125 feet of concrete flood wall, on the right bank of the Susquehanna River from Stuyvesent Street to mouth of Chenango River; about 8,380 feet of earth levee, about 2,180 feet of new concrete flood wall and raising about 125 feet of existing flood wall on the left bank of the Susquehanna River extending from Pierce Creek to high ground at State Highway 17, a debris dam and flume between Corbett and Hotchkiss Streets and a concrete pressure conduit, 1,060 feet long to carry flow of Park Creek from Vestal Avenue to the Susquehanna River; about 665 feet of levee extending from the Erie Railroad to high ground along the right bank of Chamberlain Creek near the mouth; closure structures at Erie Railroad and at Court Street; a weir, a drop structure, and about 1,800 feet of earth levee, about 2,235 feet of channel excavation, about 645 feet of channel paving and raising, about 470 feet of existing concrete flood wall, and about 200 feet of new concrete flood wall for improvement of Pierce Creek from its mouth to about 1,000 feet above Conklin Avenue; and appurtenant drainage structures. Improvement, supplemented by authorized flood control dams above the area, will provide protection for the City of Binghamton against a flood discharge about 20 percent greater than the maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935 on the Chenango River and in March 1936 on the Susquehanna River. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Repairs were made to the concrete lined channel at Park Creek. 40F. CANISTEO,NY Location. On Purdy and Bonnets Creeks in the Town of Canisteo, NY, situated along the south side of the 4-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Canisteo River, at the confluence of Bonnets Creek and the Canisteo River. (See Geological Survey map for Canisteo, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of about 8,000 feet of earth levees on the right bank of the Canisteo River, extending from high ground 1,570 feet west of State Highway Route 21 above the Town to a point at the intersection of Ordway Lane and East Main Street; about 7,400 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Purdy and Bennetts Creeks, extending from the Main Street Bridge to high ground above Greenwood Street 1,000 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Bennetts Creek extending upstream from the Main Street Bridge; a concrete check dam with wing levees from Greenwood Street; a new highway bridge at Greenwood Street; alterations to existing timber check dams in Bennetts Creek; channel excavation in Bennetts and Purdy Creeks; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 40G. CORNING, NY Location. On the Chemung River in the City of Coming, NY, about 44 miles upstream from the confluence of Chemung River and North Branch of Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Coming, NY.) Existing project. Plan of improvement provides for construction of a pumping station, earth levees, and concrete flood walls, consisting of: about 4,300 feet of earth levee, enlargement of about 8,610 feet of existing earth levee and about 3,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Chemung River, extending from the Erie Railroad Bridge to high ground at Park Avenue below the City; about 200 feet of concrete flood walls, about 2,500 feet of earth levees and enlargement of about 11,500 feet of existing earth levee on the left bank of the Chemung and Cohocton Rivers, extending from the Erie Railroad Bridge over Cohocton River to the mouth of Post Creek; about 2,500 feet of earth levee and enlargement of about 4,700 feet of existing earth levee on the right bank of Post Creek from its mouth to Watkins Street; realignment of about 3,000 feet of channel, about 8,800 feet of earth levee, about 3,000 feet of channel excavation, a pressure conduit about 400 feet long, a drop structure and a weir for improvement of Cutler Creek, extending from its mouth to high ground at Deckertown Road and Hornby Road; and appurtenant drainage structures. Flood protection on Monkey Run was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1950. Plan of improvement provides for construction of 2,010 feet of open flume, 2,320 feet of pressure conduit storm sewers, and appurtenant facilities between the existing improved channel above Sixth Street and the Chemung River at a point immediately east of Pine Street East. Modified improvement will provide protection for the City of Coming against a flood discharge in Chemung River approximately equal to the maximum flood of record, which occurred in May 1945, and on tributary streams against floods of greater magnitude than known to date. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 40H. EAST SIDNEY LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located near East Sidney, NY, on the Ouleout Creek, about five miles above the confluence of the creek with the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Franklin, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill and concrete structure, 2,010 feet long, including spillway, rises 130 feet above the streambed and consists of a concrete gravity-type section with a compacted earth-dike section at the right abutment. The outlet works consist of five rectangular conduits each 3.5 feet by 5.85 feet and 105 feet long. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 33,500 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 102 square miles which is 93 percent of the Ouleout Creek drainage area, and 5 percent of the watershed of the Susquehanna River upstream from Binghamton, NY, exclusive of the separately controlled Chenango River. Recreation facilities include a bathing beach, picnic and camping areas, and boat-launching and docking facilities. Local cooperation. None required. The Town of Sidney, NY, cooperated in the development of recreation facilities and operates and maintains all the facilities with the exception of the recreational pool, which is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 401. ELMIRA, NY Location. On the Chemung River in the City of Elmira, NY, about 27 miles upstream from the confluence of the Chemung River and North Branch of Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Elmira, NY.) Existing project. Provides for about 17,700 feet of earth levees, and about 4,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Chemung River, extending from South Hoffman Street to a point below the city near the upper end of Big Island; about 12,100 feet of earth levee and about 6,300 feet of concrete wall on the left bank of the Chemung River extending from Durland Avenue to the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad at the mouth of Newton Creek; about 10,000 feet of earth levee on right bank of Newton Creek, extending from about the intersection of Delaware, Lackawanna & 4-18 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT Western Railroad and East Church Street to high ground near intersection of Sullivan and Warren Streets; about 4,300 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Divan Creek; about 2,000 feet of concrete conduit enclosing Hoffman Brook from West Second Street to the Chemung River; clearing islands and riverbanks of trees and brush for about 3.5 miles in the Chemung River; about 14,300 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Seely Creek, extending from the Erie Railroad to high ground approximately 1,000 feet northwest of the intersection of South Broadway and Pennsylvania Avenue; a pumping plant for disposal of interior drainage; an interceptor sewer about 6,000 feet long varying in size from 48 to 96 inches in diameter; and appurtenant structures. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 40J. HORNELL, NY Location. On the Canisteo River in the City of Hornell, NY, about 42 miles upstream from the confluence of the Canisteo and Tioga Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Canisteo, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realignment and earth levees, concrete flood walls, and check dams consisting of: realignment of about 4,600 feet of the Canisteo River channel, and about 5,800 feet of earth levee on its right bank, extending from Seneca Street upstream to the junction of the Pittsburgh, Shawmut & Northern Railroad and the Erie Railroad; about 4,500 feet of earth levee, extending on both sides of Seneca Street from the Canisteo River to Wrightman Avenue and the junction of Cleveland Avenue and Bethesda Drive; about 7,200 feet of earth levee, about 2,500 feet of concrete flood wall, and raising about 1,500 feet of existing concrete flood wall, on the right bank of the Canisteo River, and about 12,000 feet of channel improvement, extending from Seneca Street to the Erie Railroad; about 2,500 feet of earth levee, about 2,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the left bank of the Canisteo River extending from a point opposite Walnut Street to the Erie Railroad; a ring-earth levee about 2,800 feet long around the sewage-disposal plant on the left bank of the Canisteo River; about 4,500 feet of realignment and improvement of the Canisteo River Channel with about 4,500 feet of earth levee on its right bank extending from Cedar Street downstream to about 1,400 feet above East Avenue; about 2,400 feet of channel paving, 1,400 feet of earth levee, raising about 1,900 feet of concrete flood wall, and construction of one check dam on Canacadea Creek; about 1,600 feet of channel paving and construction of three check dams on Chauncey Run with about 300 feet of new wall and about 300 feet of capping; a weir, a check dam, 3,030 feet of channel paving, 4,800 feet of flood walls and levees, and related work on existing walls, on Crosby Creek; removal of 6 bridges, erection of 4 bridges, miscellaneous bridge structures, and 3 drop structures; and appurtenant drainage structures and small stream control works. Improvement, supplemented by Arkport and Almond Reservoirs above the area, provides protection for the City of Hornell against a flood discharge approximately double the maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. The drainage pipes at the project were inspected by contract. The report will be completed in early fiscal year 1999. 40K. LISLE, NY Location. On the Tioughnioga River in the Village of Lisle, NY, about 12 miles upstream from the confluence of the Tioughnioga and Chenango Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Lisle, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realignment and construction of earth levees and concrete flood walls, consisting of: relocation of about 3,000 feet of Dudley Creek Channel, extending from 1,200 feet west of the intersection of Cortland and Main Streets to the confluence with Tioughnioga River, realignment of some 5,700 feet of Tioughnioga River Channel east of the Village; about 4,150 feet of earth levee and 970 feet of concrete wall on the right bank of Dudley Creek and Tioughnioga River; realignment of some 5,700 feet of Tioughnioga Street to the railroad crossing on River Street; raising about 1,860 feet of the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western single track railroad over the levee; relocation of about 1,600 feet of Cortland Street; a new bridge over relocated Dudley Creek; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 40L. OXFORD, NY Location. On the Chenango River in the Village of Oxford, NY, about 40 miles upstream from the confluence of the Chenango and Susquehanna Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Oxford, NY.) Existing project. Provides for earth levees and clearing of Chenango River Channel, consisting of about 2,100 feet of earth levees on the left bank of the Chenango River, extending from high ground near Cemetery Drive and running mostly along the railroad to high ground near Main Street; removal of dam and island below Main Street; raising the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad over the levee; and appurtenant closure and drainage structures. Improve- 4-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 ment provides protection for the Village of Oxford on the left bank against a flood discharge substantially larger than the maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 40M. WHITNEY POINT LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located near Whitney Point, NY, on the Otselic River about 0.7 mile upstream from its confluence with Tioughnioga River. (See Geological Survey map for Whitney Point and Willet, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 4,900 feet long, exclusive of a spillway, rises 95 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and gated outlet in the left abutment. The outlet works consist of three 5-foot by 10-foot gates and one emergency gate of the same size. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 86,440 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 255 square miles, the entire watershed of Otselic River, or 16 percent of the Chenango River watershed upstream from Binghamton, NY. Recreation facilities, constructed in cooperation with local interests, provide for swimming, picnicking, camping, boating, fishing, and hunting. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests operate and maintain all of the recreation facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 40N. WHITNEY POINT VILLAGE, NY Location. On the Tioughnioga River at the confluence of the Tioughnioga and Otselic Rivers, tributaries of the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Whitney Point, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realignment and earth levees, consisting of realignment of about 1,800 feet of Tioughnioga River Channel, above the confluence with Otselic River; about 7,100 feet of earth levee along the right bank of the Tioughnioga River, extending from high ground on Main Street above the Village to Collins Street just below the Village; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 41. STILLWATER LAKE, LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA Location. Dam is on the Lackawanna River, 39 miles from the mouth of the stream and about 4 miles upstream from Forest City, Susquehanna County, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheet, Honesdale, PA.) Existing project. Dam is earthfill type, rising 77 feet above the streambed, with a controlled outlet conduit and side channel spillway in the left abutment. Reservoir capacity is 12,000 acre-feet, of which 11,600 acrefeet is flood control storage and the remainder is used to maintain the existing water supply reservoir for Forest City, PA, at this site. Reservoir area is 422 acres, and the pool extends about 2.1 miles upstream. Reservoir controls 52 percent of the watershed above Carbondale, 26 percent above Olyphant, and 17 percent above Scranton. Federal cost of new work, completed in 1965, was $5,725,700 of which $4,500,500 was for construction and $1,225,200 was for lands and damages. Local cooperation. None required. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 42. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NY AND PA Plan of improvement authorized by the 1958 Flood Control Act provides for construction of Cowanesque Lake, PA, Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA, local protection works at Elkland, PA, and Nichols, NY, and channel improvements at Cortland, NY. This project plan supplemented the comprehensive flood control program for Southern New York and Northern Pennsylvania which included the Southern New York flood control project and Stillwater, Genegantslet, and South Plymouth Reservoirs. 42A. COWANESQUE LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on the Cowanesque River about 2.2 miles above its confluence with Tioga River at Lawrenceville, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Tioga, PA.) Existing project. The project provides for an earthfill dam 3,100 feet long and rising 151 feet above the streambed, an uncontrolled spillway in the right abutment, a gated conduit in the Valley floor, and flood control storage is 82,000 acre-feet. Relocation of the Town of Nelson to a new townsite was authorized by Section 121 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976. The Federal cost of this new work was $106,030,700 of which $61,743,600 was for construction and $44,287,100 was for lands and damages and relocations (which includes $5,755,000 for relocation of the Town of Nelson). Within the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers the project was modified in March 1983 in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and the Flood Control Act of 1944, as 4-20 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT amended. The modification provides for reallocating 25,600 acre-feet of present flood control storage for water supply storage by raising the permanent pool from elevation 1,045 to 1,080 mean sea level. Other features include modifying the existing intake tower and two access ramps, stabilizing the reservoir slope near the relocated Town of Nelson, replacing existing dayuse recreation facilities, and expanding both day-and overnight-use recreation facilities to accommodate an expected increase in annual visitation due to the larger pool. Estimated cost (October 1991) of the modification is $55,198,000 of which $1,257,000 is Federal (for expanded recreation facilities) and $53,941,000 is non- Federal (which includes $39,414,000 for reimbursement of the cost of existing flood control storage reallocated to water supply storage, $13,270,000 cash contribution for the water supply modification, and $1,257,000 cash contribution for expanded recreation facilities). Local cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976, which authorized relocation of the Town of Nelson, provides that before the Secretary of the Army acquires any real estate property for the new townsite, appropriate non-Federal interests shall furnish binding contractual commitments that all lots in the new townsite will be either occupied when available, replacements for open space and vacant lots in the existing town, or will be purchased by non-Federal interests at the fair market value. The required contractual agreement for local cooperation was executed with Nelson Township on August 25, 1977. The March 1983 project modification (discussed above) requires non-Federal interests repay 100 percent of the investment cost of project modifications allocated to water supply, to terrestrial wildlife habitat mitigation, and to in-kind replacement recreation, plus the allocated share of the project's original cost (escalated to current price levels). Additionally, they are required to pay annual costs of operation, maintenance, and major replacements allocated to water supply and to provide 50 percent of the cost of expanded recreation facilities, as well as, all operation, maintenance, and replacement costs for the expanded facilities. Water supply and recreation contracts were executed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) and the Susquehanna River Basin Commission on June 30, 1986. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. A contract to repair the quality control gates was awarded in September 1998. 42B. TIOGA-HAMMOND LAKES, PA Location. The dams are located in Tioga County, PA, upstream from the confluence of the Tioga River and Crooked Creek. Tioga Dam is located on the Tioga River and Hammond Dam on Crooked Creek, approximately opposite the Tioga damsite, about 3.3 miles above its mouth and less than one mile from the Village of Brooklyn. (See Geological Survey map for Tioga, PA.) Existing project. Tioga Dam is 2,600 feet long, rising 140 feet above the streambed, with a controlled outlet conduit. Hammond Dam is 5,900 feet long, and has a maximum height of 121.5 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway. Both dams are of earth and rockfill construction. The Tioga-Hammond Lakes project controls a total drainage area of 402 square miles, with Tioga Dam controlling 280 square miles of the Tioga River Basin and Hammond Dam controlling 122 square miles of the Crooked Creek Basin. Recreation facilities are provided for swimming, camping, picnicking, boating, and fishing. Federal cost of completed work was $185,620,000 of which $125,029,000 is for completed construction and $60,591,000 is for lands and damages and relocations. Estimated Federal cost (October 1988) of Mill Creek recreation facilities (inactive) is $7,500,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued, $380,000 was added to fiscal year 1998 Appropriations Act to reopen the Lamb's Creek Recreation area. Improvements included repairs to access roads, removing sediment from the boat launch, replacement of comfort stations and painting Lamb's Creek Bridge. The painting contract is under review by the Small Business Administration and award is pending. 43. WEST BRANCH OF SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PA A system of three flood control reservoirs, in the headwaters of the West Branch Susquehanna River, PA, are known as Curwensville, Alvin R. Bush (formerly known as Kettle Creek), and Foster Joseph Sayers (formerly known as Blanchard). In accordance with the terms of local cooperation, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania furnished assurances that it will coordinate operation of George B. Stevenson Reservoir (formerly known as First Fork Reservoir) with operation of Curwensville, Alvin R. Bush, and Foster Joseph Sayers Reservoirs to secure optimum flood control benefits from system operation. George B. Stevenson Reservoir on the First Fork Sinnemahoning Creek in Cameron and Potter Counties, PA, was constructed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania at a first cost of $12,240,000 and an estimated $30,000 annually for operation and maintenance. 43A. ALVIN R. BUSH DAM, PA Location. Alvin R. Bush Dam (formerly Kettle Creek Dam) is located on Kettle Creek about 8.4 miles above the mouth and 15 miles upstream from Renovo, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Keating, PA.) 4-21 REPORT OF THE SEORETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 1,350 feet long, rises 165 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled spillway located in rock adjacent to the right abutment, and has a horseshoe-shaped outlet tunnel with 3 service gates. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 75,000 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 226 square miles or about 92 percent of the Kettle Creek watershed. Recreation facilities are provided for camping, fishing, boating, picnicking, hiking, winter sports, hunting, and swimming by the State of Pennsylvania at Kettle Creek State Park. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 43B. CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on the West Branch of the Susquehanna River approximately 2.5 miles upstream from Curwensville, Clearfield County, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Curwensville, PA.) Existing project. Within the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers, the project was modified in September 1992, in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended. The modification provides for reallocating an estimated 5,360 acre-feet of storage from conservation to water supply. The reallocation project includes a year-round normal pool and modifications to the existing recreation area. Estimated cost of the modification is $1.7 million which is being funded entirely by the local sponsor, the Susquehanna River Basin Commission. In addition, the sponsor will reimburse the Federal Government about $4.5 million for part of the original project cost. Local cooperation. The 1992 project modification requires non-Federal interests to pay 100 percent of costs allocated to water supply plus the allocated share of the original project cost (escalated to current price levels). Additionally, they must pay annual costs of operation, maintenance, and major replacement allocated to water supply. A water supply contract was executed on September 30, 1994. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Plans and specifications for construction were finalized in June 1996 and a construction contract was awarded August 19, 1996. The overall project completion date was August 1997. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 43C. FOSTER JOSEPH SAYERS DAM, PA Location. Dam is located on Bald Eagle Creek in Centre County, PA, about one mile upstream from Blanchard and about 14 miles above the confluence of Bald Eagle Creek with the West Branch Susquehanna River at Lock Haven, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Howard, PA.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 6,835 feet long, rises 100 feet above the streambed, and has an open-cut concrete chute and uncontrolled concrete weir 600 feet wide located in rock in a saddle adjacent to the left abutment. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consist of a 15-foot diameter circular outlet conduit with two hydraulically-operated wheel gates 7 feet wide and 15 feet high. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 99,000 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 339 square miles or 88 percent of the drainage area above Beech Creek and 43 percent of the Bald Eagle Creek drainage area. Recreation facilities are provided for boating, camping, fishing, picnicking, hunting, swimming, hiking, and winter sports by the State of Pennsylvania at Bald Eagle State Park. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. A contract for rehabilitation of the service gate system in the control tower was completed in January 1998. The drainage pipes at the Howard levee were inspected by contract. The report will be completed in early fiscal year 1999. 44. WYOMING VALLEY, PA (LEVEE RAISING) Location. The Wyoming Valley flood control projects are located in Northeastern Pennsylvania on the Susquehanna River in Luzerne County and are the four contiguous existing Federal flood control projects at Plymouth, Kingston-Edwardsville, Swoyersville-Forty Fort, and Wilkes-Barre/Hanover Township, which together function as a flood control system within the Wyoming Valley. Existing project. The proposed modification provides for raising existing levees and floodwalls between 3 and 5 feet, structural, mechanical and electrical modifications to pump stations, modifying closure structures, relocating utilities and providing some new floodwalls and levees to maintain the integrity of the existing flood control system. The proposed project also includes a plan to reduce project-related adverse impacts. The current estimated total project is $145,000,000 which includes a future inflation allowance through project completion. The Luzerne County Flood Protection Authority is the sponsor for the project. The Local sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements and rightsof- way; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities; pay 50% of costs allocated to recreation; and bear all costs of operations, maintenance and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities after construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. With fiscal year funds of $12,596,000, the first construction 4-22 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT contract at Exeter was completed. Work was continued on two other construction contracts at Swoyersville- Forty Fort and modifications to the sanitary Pump Stations. A fourth construction contract at Kingston- Edwardsville was awarded and work started. Work continued to finalize the remaining plans and specifications. The levee raising construction is scheduled to be completed in September 2002. 45. YORK, INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA Location. On Codorus Creek 10 miles above its confluence with the Susquehanna River. Codorus Creek has tributary branches in York County in the south and central parts of Pennsylvania. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets for York and Hanover, PA.) Existing project. Indian Rock Dam is an earth and rockfill dam about 1,000 feet long at the top, rising 83 feet above the streambed, with a reservoir providing for control storage of 28,000 acre-feet. The dam is on the main branch of Codorus Creek about 3 miles above York. Outlet works are in the right abutment, and the uncontrolled spillway is on the right bank. The reservoir will control the entire drainage area of the main branch of Codorus Creek and 41 percent of the drainage area above York. Improvements in Codorus Creek in the vicinity of and through the City of York provide for 22,969 feet of channel extending from 300 feet above Richland Avenue to a point downstream from the Pennsylvania Railroad crossing known as Black Bridge. Improvements, which will increase channel capacity to 24,000 cubic feet per second, include widening and deepening the channel, bank protection, removal of York Roller Mill Dam, and a low water channel about 3,900 feet long in the vicinity of York Roller Mill Dam. Cost of new work for the completed project was $5,061,167, of which $4,566,446 (regular funds) and $11,588 (emergency relief funds) were for construction and $483,133 (regular funds) was for lands and damages. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. The drainage pipes at the Codorus Creek levee were inspected by contract. The report will be completed in early fiscal year 1999. 46. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Projects in New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, District of Columbia, and Virginia were inspected during the period by hired labor. See table 4-1. 47. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Operations and results during fiscal year. The operation of George B. Stevenson Dam, PA, was coordinated with the operation of Alvin R. Bush, Curwensville, and Foster Joseph Sayers Dams in the West Branch Susquehanna River Basin in order to secure optimum flood control benefits from the system operation. Supplemental instructions for the operation of Savage River Dam, MD, were provided, during periods of high water, to insure maximum protection for downstream localities. 48. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Cost for the period was $421,579 for the Disaster Preparedness Program. Cost for the period was $100,547 for Mobilization, Continuity of Government and Emergency Water Preparedness Programs. Cost for the period was $64,579 for Emergency Operations and $57,049 for Rehabilitations. Cost for the period for Advance Measures was $1,386,304 for the Assateague Island Breach Contingency. Federal year costs were $9,992 for Section 205 Coordination $12,551 for Anacostia Flood Warning System; $69,838 for Elkton, MD; $108,097 for Gwynns Falls, Baltimore, MD $76 for Hancock, MD, $3,329 Lycoming County Flood Warning System, PA, $2,959 for Marsh Run, Borough of Dushore, PA. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as amended (pre-authorization). Fiscal year costs were $322,531 for Hooper Island Causeway, MD and $15,671 for Section 14 Coordination. Non-Federal contributed costs were $14,577 for Hooper Island Causeway, MD. ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION 49. ANACOSTIA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, MD AND DC Location. The project area is the 170-square mile watershed of the Anacostia River. This watershed encompasses approximately 145 square miles in Montgomery and Prince George's Counties, Maryland, and 25 square miles in the District of Columbia. The entire area is within the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. Existing Project. The authorized plan provides for the construction of 80 acres of tidal and non-tidal freshwater wetlands, the restoration of 5 miles of piedmont streams, and the planting of 33 acres of bottomland hardwood forest within the highly urbanized Anacostia 4-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 River watershed. The construction is located at 13 sites within the project area. The 13 actions include 2 wetland restorations, development of 5 stormwater management wetlands areas, and restoration of 6 stream reaches. The current estimated total cost for the Anacostia environmental restoration project is $16 million. Local Cooperation. The non-Federal sponsors for the project are Montgomery County, Prince George's County, the District of Columbia, the Maryland- National Capital Park and Planning Commission, and the National Park Service. The last two sponsors are the current landowners of the project sites. The non-Federal sponsors are required to pay 25 percent of the cost allocated to fish and wildlife restoration and to bear all costs of operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation and replacement of the facilities after construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. In fiscal year 1998, plans and specifications for several restoration sites were completed, in preparation for fiscal year 1999 construction. Project construction is scheduled to begin in the third quarter of fiscal year 1999, and continue through to September 2001, with project monitoring planned through September 2004, subject to the provision of Federal funds. 50. CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RECOVERY, MD Location. The project is located in the Maryland portion of the Chesapeake Bay. Existing project. The authorized project contributes to multi-agency and private efforts to restore oyster populations in the Maryland portion of the Chesapeake Bay. Project elements include: construction and rehabilitation of oyster habitat; construction of seed bar facilities for production of oyster seed or "spat"; purchase of diseasefree spat from state-owned hatcheries, planting of disease-free spat in locations which best foster oyster production and health; and monitoring of project performance to increase oyster populations. The current estimated total project cost is $3,334,000. Local cooperation. The State of Maryland is the sponsor for the project. The local sponsor is required to pay 25% of the cost allocated to fish and wildlife restoration and to bear all costs of operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation and replacement of fish and wildlife facilities after construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Seed and new oyster bars were created with 236,800 bushels of shell at Kedges Strait, and in the Chester River. The State of Maryland placed 4 million spat on these bars. Project monitoring activities continued. The overall project is scheduled for completion in September 2000. 51. POPLAR ISLAND, MD Location. The group of islands known as Poplar Island is located in the upper middle Chesapeake Bay approximately 34 nautical miles southeast of the Port of Baltimore and 1 mile northwest of Tilghman Island, Talbot County, MD. Existing project. The authorized project provides for the use of approximately 38 million cubic yards of dredged material from the southern approach channels of the Baltimore Harbor and Channels navigation project to restore 1,110 acres of remote habitat. The restoration project will employ dikes to contain the dredged materials necessary for the wetlands vegetation and to protect the facility from the severe wave activity common in this region of the Chesapeake Bay. The placement site will restore Poplar Island to its approximate 1847 configuration and will consist of 555 acres of upland habitat at an elevation up to +20 feet MLLW and 555 acres of wetland habitat that would be further divided into approximately 444 acres of low marsh and 111 acres of high marsh. The current estimated total project cost is $427 million (including a future inflation allowance through the project completion). Local cooperation. The State of Maryland is the project sponsor and the Local Cooperation Agreement was executed April 4, 1997. The sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; pay 25% of the cost of the project; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, replacement and major rehabilitation of the ecosystem restoration project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Phase I construction contract was awarded on January 27, 1998 in the amount of $45,400,000. Phase I construction is scheduled to be completed in September 1999. 52. ROOSTER ISLAND, DORCHESTER COUNTY, MARYLAND Location. The project area is located in Cambridge, the county seat of Dorchester County, Maryland, on the south bank of the Choptank River, about 1 3/4 miles northwest of the Choptank River Bridge (U.S. Route 50) and about 70 miles southeast of Baltimore, Maryland. The project area includes two distinct sites: Rooster Island and a previously used upland dredged material placement site. Existing Project. Restoration of Rooster Island included using material previously dredged from Cambridge Harbor and placed in an upland site to construct 6 acres of wetlands protected by a 2,100-foot break-water. A groin field to stabilize the leeward side of the restoration project was constructed and approximately 28,000 cubic yards of fill has been placed and planted with wetland vegetation. The purpose of the project was to restore wetland habitat and to protect approximately 80 acres of shallow water habitat within Hambrooks Bay. 4-24 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT Local Cooperation. Dorchester County was the project sponsor, and they received financial assistance from the State of Maryland. The non-Federal sponsor was responsible for 25% of the total project cost. The non- Federal sponsor signed the Project Cooperation Agreement on 26 June 1998. The County is responsible for operation and maintenance of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. The construction contract was awarded on 28 July 1997 in the amount of $1,000,557. The construction work is to be completed in November 1998. REGULATORY PROGRAM 53. REGULATORY PROGRAM During fiscal year 1998, there 306 pending applications; received 2,746 new applications for permits to proceed with activities in navigable and other waters of the United States including wetlands within Maryland, Washington, DC, the Susquehanna River Basin in Pennsylvania, and military bases in Northern Virginia. Of the 2,625 final actions; 169 were withdrawn and one was denied. The enforcement program began the year with 166 active cases; initiated 501 new violation cases, resolved 117 cases. In addition, 765 jurisdictional verifications were requested and performed; 12 public hearings were held. Total costs during the fiscal year were $4,249,414. WATER SUPPLY 54. WASHINGTON AQUEDUCT Location. The diversion dam and raw water supply intakes at Great Falls, the two collecting conduits, part of Dalecarlia receiving reservoir, the booster pumping of Dalecarlia receiving reservoir, the booster pumping station and the Little Falls raw water pumping station are located in Maryland. All other structures of the water supply system including parts of the raw water collecting system, two purification plants, pumping stations, storage reservoirs, and transmission mains are in the District of Columbia. Federally owned water mains are maintained in Virginia and Maryland. Existing project. Control of the water supply system is vested in the Chief of Engineers (see Acts of March 3, 1859, and March 2, 1867, November 22, 1973 and Sec. 1800 of Revised Statutes). The project includes: administration; operation and maintenance of the collection, purification, pumping, and transmission facilities; protection of the water supply system; engineering; and construction of major water system additions and improvements. Authority to supply water to Arlington County, the City of Falls Church, and other jurisdictions in Virginia is contained in Public Law 119, 69th Congress, approved April 14, 1926; and Public Law 118, 80th Congress, June 26, 1947. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 4-19 of the Fiscal Year 1981 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Purified water was furnished to the District of Columbia; Arlington County, and Falls Church, VA; and to the Federal establishments in the District of Columbia, Arlington County, VA, and Montgomery County, MD. Total consumption for fiscal year 1998 was 66.5 billion gallons. The average amount furnished Arlington County and Falls Church, VA was 43.0 million gallons per day. The Corps of Engineers was reimbursed $33,559,714 of which $11,378,480 was from VA. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 55. SURVEYS Federal costs for the fiscal year were $4,621,957 which $195,944 was for navigation studies, $2,538,043 for flood damage prevention studies, $1,397,082 for special studies, $22,945 for review of completed projects, $280,517 for special investigations, $20,474 for interagency water resource development, $23,795 for environmental infrastructure, and $143,157 for coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests. Non-Federal contributed costs for the fiscal year were $1,152,453 of which $688,923 was for navigation studies, $458,232 for flood damage prevention studies, $1 for review of completed projects, and $5,298 for coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interest. 56. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for flood plain management activities and general planning guidance during the period was $186,781. Providing assistance and guidance to local interests on methods and procedures for preventing and reducing flood damages was in progress at end of fiscal year. 57. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Washington, DC & Vicinity-The authorized project would provide for raising the grade of a portion of P Street, filling an area near the Lincoln Memorial (along 23rd Street), regrading the area adjacent to 17th Street and constructing a removable closure structure across 17th Street. These measures were authorized to restore the design level of protection of the existing project and 4-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 to reduce the need for emergency closure in the event of a flood. Total costs during the fiscal year were $36,096. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $3,170,000. Mussers Dam, PA - The authorized project consists of reconstruction of Mussers Dam, a small dam owned by the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission which formerly impounded a 100-acre lake for fish, wildlife, and recreation purposes. In 1992 the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ordered the dam decommissioned and breached due to safety reasons. Estimated preconstruction planning cost was $850,000. Non-Federal interests agreed to terminate the project due to unanticipated additional upstream flowage easements required by PA Dam Safety Regulations. Baltimore Harbor & Anchorages, MD-The proposed project would: widen and deepen Federal anchorages, widen branch channels, dredge a new branch channel, dredge a turning basin and deauthorize an existing anchorage. Total costs during the fiscal year were $357,856. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $900,000. 4-26 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 Sept. 30, 1998 1. Baltimore Harbor New Work and Channels, MD and VA 2. Baltimore Harbor, MD, Collection & Removal of Drift 3. Chester River, MD 4. Crisfield Harbor, MD 5. Fishing Bay, MD 6. Fishing Creek, MD 7. Herring Bay & Rockhold Creek, MD 8. Herring Creek, Tall Timbers, MD Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost 200,000 231,000 503,107 317,480 (80,000) 144,972,7121 110,505 (192,418) 144,811,5771 12,736,000 11,823,000 10,888,000 16,288,000 190,713,6692 12,841,978 11,411,410 11,268,468 15,267,157 189,855,6122 13,712 - 108,000 527,674 67,669,614 - 124,837 497,983 66,802,351 400,000 378,100 320,000 348,000 7,269,699 410,686 378,109 319,082 344,122 7,274,193 (16,000) (153,356) 35,100 28,261 35,000 35,000 121,650 25,865 - - - 70,4953 - - - 70,4953 79,900 635,000 21,200 3,523,524 63,445 650,831 21,825 582,745 82,200 28,226 37,000 35,545 19,288 67,700 67,342 25,000 25,000 10,000 5,413 47,410 48,632 16,664 504,100 503,417 5.682 222 3,177 476,4544 416,7364 1,891,843 1,890,750 121,650 64,994 34,0745 34,0745 8,600 2,161,360 9,541 2,161,260 25,000 410,000 (26,800) 2,278,080 20,210 408,248 (20,258) 2,292,427 - 100,000 - 48,029 (6,000) (6,099) 20,000 18,669 0 100 48,000 35,730 12,826 - 150,591 34,717 133,337 - 1,105,148 - 1,105,148 - 1,506,259 - 1,504,297 711 216,329 216,265 10,306 10,306 4-27 TABLE 4-A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 9. Honga River & Tar Bay, MD 10. Lower Thorofare, Deal Island, MD 11. Neabsco Creek, VA 12. Northeast River, MD 13. Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD 14. Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, DC Collection & Removal of Drift 15. Potomac River Aquatic Plant Control MD, VA and DC 16. Potomac River at Alexandria, VA 17. Potomac River Below Washington, DC Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Total to FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 Sept. 30, 1998 673,300 782,200 675,377 715,475 58,800 57,841 100,000 84,286 20,000 17,525 41,312 42,272 40,000 35,854 37,000 27,740 - - 66,1196 - - 66,1196 66,000 354,000 6,112,135 141,289 352,828 6,144,336 - 62,000 1,849,1587 - 45,253 1,832,4117 - - 720,142 - - 743,142 - - 350,000 - - 350,000 - - 58,800 - - 57,841 37,000 710,000 1,944,517 41,914 724,045 1,947,744 - - 28,4898 - - 28,4898 50,000 25,000 1,150,344 57,977 23,645 1,115,231 - - - 362,1939 - - - 362,1939 594,100 124,500 634,100 49,000 11,916,800 595,716 125,282 634,012 46,713 11,914,258 730,000 864,000 759,000 831,000 14,283,375 734,580 858,594 766,753 828,458 14,278,017 20,000 165,355 10,000 52,124 - 94,100 2,395,165 21,416 88,449 2,386,769 125 - 60,000 - 36,589 - 100,000 - 90,822 126 41,000 174,100 41,798 141,704 301,866 292,116 95,214 95,214 933,258 878,248 - - 254,036 - - 244,858 62,000 176,000 2,519,294 59,450 145,553 2,986,297 4-28 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 Sept. 30, 1998 18. Prevention of Obstructions & Injurious Deposits, Baltimore Harbor, MD 19. Rock Hall Harbor, MD 20. Tedious Creek, MD 21. Twitch Cove & Big Thorofare, MD 22. Washington Harbor, DC 23. Wicomico River, MD 27. Atlantic Coast of Maryland 28. Broad Top Region, PA 29. Cumberland, MD and Ridgeley, WV 30. Jennings Randolph Lake, MD and WV Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost 510,000 500,000 577,000 551,000 9,720,045 507,555 503,242 578,054 544,192 9,712,389 - - 45,000 335,000 380,000 - - 44,647 334,400 452,477 80,000 24,700 63,125 41,346 - 241,000 11,884 502 1,982,500 1,910,740 232,183 177,500 2,365,300 216,933 2,330,013 - 336,680 5,424 344,952 - - - - 424,800 - - - - 424,800 - 144,100 1,242,000 844,100 5,679,111 -115,050 1,261,707 849,728 5,635,677 32,000 32,950 34,100 24,800 35,050 22,616 59,000 130,000 2,015,410 84,108 123,464 2,023,344 100,000 2,298,704 - 3,191,07710 - 3,191,07710 21,000 5,192,68311,12 19,518 5,188,91711,12 - 471,60913 - 471,60913 78,000 11,845,515 76,464 11,845,515 - - 7,301,000 34,611,000 92,716 136,115 3,760,164 31,041,297 1,419,907 121,260 68,910 5,018,670 21,691,052 1,861,518 175,820 58,752 4,234,108 20,789,932 100,000 69,963 75,000 71,774 - - - 100,000 1 514,718 2,747,659 3,332,341 83,000 97,000 86,698 92,776 - 15,634,070 - 15,634,070 352,000 1,818,513 57,148 1,519,437 - - - 150,000 - - - 11,648 1,555,000 1,806,000 2,122,650 2,301,000 1,578,993 1,778,273 2,165,781 2,286,156 - 6,350 - 6,350 176,475,300 176,345,381 23,955,572 23,929,471 6,350 6,350 4-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 Sept. 30, 1998 31A. Aylesworth Creek New Work 32. Lock Haven, PA 33. Moorefield, WV 34. Olyphant, Lackawanna River, PA 35. Paxton Creek, Harrisburg, PA 36. Petersburg, WV 37. Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, Juniata River, PA 38. Scranton, Lackawanna River, PA 39. South Central Environmental Restoration Infrastructure and Resource Protection Development Pilot, PA Lake, PA 147,000 147,000 147,984 147,600 - (370,000) 1,772,709 (356,552) - 274,893 694,191 510,640 Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost 8,374,100 7,806,602 1,073,757 849,288 1,100,000 170,000 588,996 637,460 (3,433) 3,435,000 3,206,453 1,875 625 -2,320,410 - - 2,320,410 201,000 199.000 2,796,523 204,245 199,220 2,796,457 80,000 301,301 124,196 121,453 55,235,000 55,254,508 18,246,064 6,771,585 1,580,000 19,788,100 2,245,941 18,084,346 473 1,205,602 14,013 1,193,606 - 1,847,000 - 1,473,214 42,117 100,000 8,633,000 6,953,624 13,256 212,189 577,000 246,758 1,778 1,484 84,900 47,051 37,500 14,917 19,440,000 18,248,503 80,000 80,000 - - 77,418,770 - - 77,418,770 6,000 4,750,800 58,123,415 7,190 5,674,106 57,920,448 7,500 3,050 10,500 - 650 650 5,425,000 1,368,973 12,200 15,350,000 1,550,027 (241,825) (29,884) 7,142,000 2,944,426 41,000 0 27,450,000 7,356,452 5,687,475 5,781,001 2,184 1,159 1,531,000 1,719,435 6,495,000 7,077,000 6,448,069 5,983,414 - 80,000 - 80,000 5,465,000 3,425,000 5,55 3,699,834 4,865,817 4,80 1,000,000 740,993 3,500,000 419,832 43,300 23,041 377,000 617,428 1,750,000 1,708,111 1,595,000 1,615,197 340,000 217,032 28,800 1,850,000 3,357,800 4,291,000 4,172,647 4-30 740,000 667,330 118,116 118,116 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 Sept. 30, 1998 40A. Addison, NY New Work Approp. -- - - 827,050 Cost - - - - 827,050 Maint. Approp. 8,000 8,000 13,000 5,010 319,065 Cost 7,748 8,863 12,345 5,740 319,066 40B. Almond Lake, NY New Work Approp. - - - - 5,760,211 Cost - - - - 5,760,211 Maint. Approp. 408,000 405,000 493,000 427,000 7,436,681 Cost 370,920 411,963 505,537 425,001 7,406,368 40C. Arkport Dam, NY New Work Approp. - - - - 1,910,00014 Cost - - - - 1,910,00014 Maint. Approp. 179,000 177,100 227,000 213,000 3,677,812 Cost 172,508 150,532 261,158 214,078 3,677,767 40D. Avoca, NY New Work Approp. - - - - 436,37415 Cost - - - - 015 Maint. Approp. 16,000 14,100 20,000 6,100 565,261 Cost 16,065 14,247 15,819 10,491 565,113 40E. Binghamton, NY New Work Approp. - - - - 3,460,00016 Cost - - - - 3,460,00016 Maint. Approp. 44,100 40,000 41,000 101,600 905,981 Cost 52,282 44,850 41,491 97,670 901,441 40F. Canisteo, NY New Work Approp. - - - - 1,183,11117 Cost - - - - 1,183,11117 Maint. Approp. 22,900 32,000 50,000 10,200 1,084,235 Cost 24,400 31,640 42,756 18,142 1,084,178 40G. Corning, NY New Work Approp. - - - - 3,322,00018 Cost - - - - 3,322,00018 Maint. Approp. 45,100 61,800 51,600 47,280 1,222,278 Cost 45,001 59,906 48,065 52,762 1,223,222 40H. East Sidney Lake, New Work NY Approp. - - - - 6,049,504 Cost - - - - 6,049,504 Maint. Approp. 447,000 436,000 460,000 479,000 9,367,771 Cost 423,181 468,308 467,499 464,032 9,420,680 401. Elmira, NY New Work Approp. - -- - 6,883,305 Cost - - - - 6,883,305 Maint. Approp. 5,000 12,000 18,500 1,760 424,809 Cost 11,270 13,025 12,810 7,446 424,805 4-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 Sept. 30, 1998 40J. Hornell, NY New Work 40K. Lisle, NY 40L. Oxford, NY 40M. Whitney Point Lake, NY 40N. Whitney Point Village, NY 41. Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, PA 42A. Cowanesque Lake, PA 42B. Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA 43A. Alvin R. Bush Dam, PA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 135,000 121,600 24,100 23,775 13,000 12,112 158,000 169,179 26,100 26,859 14,100 16,619 - - 4,558,69819 - - 4,558,69819 160,000 147,030 9,799,606 162,189 148,312 9,799,454 - - 661,19920 S - 661,19920 37,300 22,550 1,013,072 31,500 28,115 1,012,632 27,500 (2,230) 18,740 6,592 131,00021 131,00021 359,102 359,077 -- - - 5,421,540 - - - 5,421,540 1,410,000 2,461,000 587,900 596,800 13,882,996 917,201 2,945,401 603,349 547,990 13,993,893 - - - 424,196 - - - 424,196 19,000 18,903 313,000 304,415 (106,000) (106,542) 2,071,000 1,604,961 18,000 18,599 36,000 14,700 26,448 24,040 568,181 567,867 - - - 5,725,700 - - - 5,725,700 325,500 336,900 328,000 5,638,990 336,909 336,812 334,136 5,637,969 2,670 1,862,000 2,307,851 106,542 - - 107,470,700 - - 107,470,751 1,615,800 1,459,000 21,546,181 685,483 1,416,058 20,507,365 - - 13,495,276 - - 13,515,275 S- - - 186,244,800 - - - 186,244,800 2,070,000 2,477,900 2,280,000 2,615,200 31,213,143 2,040,404 2,416,505 2,419,061 2,355,484 30,931,967 - - - - 7,103,001 - - - - 7,103,001 569,000 519,000 579,000 493,000 11,487,076 549,091 537,348 598,440 492,083 11,494,936 4-32 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 Sept. 30, 1998 43B. Curwensville Lake, New Work PA Approp. - - - - 20,406,060 43C. Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, PA 44. Wyoming Valley, PA (Levee Raising) 45. York, Indian Rock Dam, PA 49. Anacostia River & Tributaries, MD & DC 50. Chesapeake Bay Oyster Recovery, MD 51. Poplar Island, MD 52. Rooster Island, Dorchester County, MD Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost 606,000 653,600 592,908 671,420 - 249,600 - 135,400 - - 20,406,060 636,000 625,265 35,000 53,285 669,000 685,483 990,410 1,169,309 13,913,176 13,900,260 1,275,010 1,357,994 -- - - 30,887,06322 -- - - 30,887,06322 689,000 742,900 1,152,200 701,000 14,397,308 654,352 773,682 1,150,160 721,185 3,950,313 2,000,000 2,021,000 10,307,000 8,596,000 1,833,599 2,090,356 4,790,496 11,543,597 20,258,048 20,258,048 - 300,000 500,000 1,000,000 1,800,000 - 182,435 852,321 1,034,756 - - - 5,601,16723 S- - 5,601,16723 596,000 1,413,000 2,129,000 505,410 16,365,79024 518,946 1,481,606 2,151,907 504,286 16,367,82924 - 2,401,000 - 750,516 421,000 149,180 2,401,000 750,516 11,000 495,000 509,000 1,436,000 211,428 500,809 450,813 1,312,230 - 757,000 - 743,614 - 50,000 70,000 57,823 13,542,000 8,512,844 2,975,000 1,406,474 63,000 700,000 59,506 694,185 - 378,000 (76,900) - 0 278,801 14,299,000 9,256,458 3,025,000 1,406,474 763,000 753,691 301,100 278,801 1. Includes $8,467,003 for previous projects. 2. Includes $409,802 for previous projects. 3. Includes $40,041 for previous projects. 4. Includes $87,741 for previous projects. 5. Includes $2,840 for previous projects. 6. Excludes $2,200 contributed funds and includes $27,668 emergency relief funds. 7. Includes $5,000 for previous projects. 8. Includes $20,641 for previous projects. 9. Includes $283,008 public works funds and $67,185 emergency relief funds; excludes $500,000 contributed funds. 10. Includes $3,029,001 for previous project. 11. Excludes $1,831,609 for previous project. 12. Excludes $4,000 for emergency dredging under provisions of Section 3, 1945 River and Harbor Act. 13. Includes $50,000 for previous project and excludes $14,000 contributed funds. 14. Includes $62,577 emergency relief funds. 15. Includes $109,944 emergency relief funds. 16. Excludes $163,096 contributed funds. 17. Includes $207,520 rehabilitation funds. 18. Excludes $34,729 contributed funds. 19. Includes $250,899 emergency relief funds and excludes $15,000 contributed funds. 20. Includes $71,557 emergency relief funds. 21. Includes $73,465 emergency relief funds. 22. Excludes $263,900 contributed funds in accordance with the Tri-party Agreement for construction of a sanitary system for public use. 23. Includes $11,588 emergency relief funds. 24. Includes $15,000 for deferred maintenance. 4-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 4-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS, MD and VA Aug. 8, Branch channel 35 feet deep to head of Curtis Bay, and one 35 feet deep and 1917 400 feet wide Fort McHenry to Port Covington entrance channel, thence 150 feet wide to Ferry Bar, and thence 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide to Hanover Street Bridge, widen approaches and bends, and enlarge anchorage basin near entrance. Inclusion of Patapsco River and tributaries into one project for Baltimore Harbor.1 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 H. Doc. 799, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. Change in location of anchorage near upper end of Fort McHenry Channel. Increased anchorage facilities. Jul. 3, For 37-foot depth in that portion of channel to Baltimore lying between 37-foot 1930 depth curve near Baltimore Light to Sparrows Point entrance channel; widen angle between Fort McHenry and Ferry Bar section; and for width of 400 feet in Curtis Bay section. Oct. 17, For 22-, 18-, and 15-foot channels in Curtis Creek from 22-foot depth below 1940 Pennington Avenue Bridge to upper end of marginal wharf of U.S. Ordinance Depot. Mar. 2, Uniform main channel 39 feet deep from the ocean through York Spit section 1945 and Craighill entrance to Fort McHenry, additional anchorage area, 2,400 feet long, 1,200 feet wide, and 30 feet deep; a connecting channel 400 feet wide and 27 feet deep from Cutoff Brewerton Angle in main channel to Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay; a channel in Curtis Creek 200 feet wide and 35 feet deep from head of existing 35-foot project channel in Curtis Bay to a point in the creek about 750 feet below Pennington Avenue Bridge. Mar. 2, A channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 22-foot depth curve south of 1945 Baltimore & Ohio R.R. bridge about 2,800 feet to vicinity of Arundel Cove, thence 100 feet wide in Arundel Cove for about 2,100 feet; with an anchorage basin about 700 feet square adjacent to channel southwesterly of Coast Guard wharf. Jul. 3, Main channel 42 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide in Cape Henry section at 1958 entrance to Chesapeake Bay and in York Spit section; 42 feet deep and 800 feet wide in Rappahannock Spit section and in approach channel to Baltimore Harbor from Craighill entrance to Fort McHenry, with widening at entrance and bends; channels 42 feet deep and 600 feet wide in Curtis Bay and Ferry Bar sections of harbor; a connecting channel 35 feet deep and 600 feet wide from main channel to approach channel to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal; and for three disjointed sections of channels of same depth and width in Chesapeake Bay leading to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal; and to provide Federal maintenance of 39-foot depth in Northwest Branch, in areas dredged to that depth by local interests. Dec. 31, Deepening of the Cape Henry Channel to 50 feet at the existing width of 1,000 1970 feet, with widening at bends; deepening of the Spit Channel to 50 feet at the existing width of 1,000 feet, with widening at bends; enlargement of the Rappahannock Shoal Channel to a depth of 50 feet and a width of 1,000 feet; deepening of the main ship channel from Chesapeake Bay to Fort McHenry to a depth of 50 feet at the existing width of 800 feet, with widening at bends and at the Craighill Entrance; deepening of the Curtis Bay Channel to a depth of 50 feet at the existing width of 600 feet, and deepening of the 950-foot wide and 980-foot long turning basin at the head of channel to the same depth; deepening of the Northwest Branch-East Channel to a depth of 49 feet from the depth existing at the time of construction at a width of 600 feet, and deepening of the 950-foot wide and 950-foot long turning basin at the head of the channel to the same depth; and deepening and extension of the Northwest Branch-West Channel to a depth of 40 feet from the depth existing at the Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. Adopted as a national defense project. (No printed report.) H. Doc. 741, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. In accordance with plans on file in the Office, Chief of Engineers H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 181, 94th Cong., 1st Sess. 4-34 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents time of construction, at a width of 600 feet, and with an irregularly shaped turning basin at the head of the channel 40 feet deep and about 2,000 feet long with a maximum width of 1,150 feet. Jun. 30, 1948 Mar. 3, 1873 Sep. 19, 1980 Jun. 30, 1948 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 26, 1937 BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD, COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Collection and removal of drift from Baltimore Harbor and its tributary waters. CHESTER RIVER, MD A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide from Chester River to Eastern Bay through Kent Island Narrows. A channel 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Crumpton to Jones Landing. A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 75 feet wide extending from the 7-foot depth in Kent Island Narrows 800 feet into Wells Cove with a basin of the same depth and 300 feet square at the head of the channel. CRISFIELD HARBOR, MD A 12-foot channel of varying widths to opposite Consumers Ice Co., thence 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from ice plant to Hop Point. 7-foot channel 100 feet wide from opposite Hop Point to an anchorage parallel to Brick Kiln Road. For the 7-foot x 60-foot channel in Little Annemessex River... Mar. 3, A mooring basin 7 feet deep, 160 feet wide, and about 875 feet long roughly 1945 parallel to Brick Kiln Rd., with a channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide leading from there to the 7-foot project channel connecting Little Annemessex and Big Annemessex Rivers. Sep. 3, An anchorage basin in Somers Cove 10 feet by 600 feet by 1,000 feet with an 1954 approach channel 10 feet by 100 feet from 10-foot depth in Little Annemessex River through a land cut in Jersey Island to south side of basin. Aug. 14, Change location and dimensions of approach channel to Somers Cove to 1958 plan No. 2 through the present entrance, at no increase in Federal cost of modification. FISHING BAY, MD Aug. 26, Provided for channels 6 feet deep and generally 60 feet wide at mean low 1937 water, suitably widened where necessary to offer adequate sheltered anchorage space from deep water and in Fishing Bay to vicinity of county or packing house wharves in McCready's, Farm, and Goose Creeks. FISHING CREEK, MD Aug. 26, A channel 7 feet deep with widths of 100 feet and 60 feet from deep water in 1937 Chesapeake Bay to an anchorage of the same depth, 120 feet wide and 400 feet long, located in the marsh 500 feet above the mouth of the creek and twin stone jetties at the entrance. HERRING BAY AND ROCKHOLD CREEK, MD Jul. 3, A channel 60 feet wide, 5 feet deep, from the 6-foot contour in Herring Bay to 1930 the 3-foot contour in Rockhold Creek. Jun. 20, For the present project channel dimensions, 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide, the 1938 turning basin 7 feet deep, and a stone breakwater 900 feet long. River and Harbor Act of 1948 H. Doc. 381, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 65, 51st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 380, 80th Cong., Ist Sess. 2 H. Doc. 355, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 72, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 457, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 435, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 435, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1286, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.2 H. Doc. 241, 75th Cong., 1st. Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 34, 71st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 595, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.2 4-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents HERRING CREEK, TALL TIMBERS, MD Jul. 3, Provides for an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide with a turning 1950 basin of irregular shape and 6 feet deep, and riprap stone jetties on the upstream and downstream sides of the entrance channel 770 and 650 feet long, respectively. The project length is 1,630 feet. Mar. 7, Constructing 250 feet of beachfill, 2,187 linear feet of stone revetment, and 1986 upgrading 350 feet of existing revetment along the Tall Timbers waterfront. Sec. Ill HONGA RIVER AND TAR BAY, MD Aug. 30, Channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from the 7-foot contour in Chesapeake Bay 1935 through Tar Bay and Fishing Creek to the 7-foot contour in Honga River. Jun. 30, Modification providing for a channel in Back Creek 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide 1948 from the 7-foot depth curve in Honga River to a point near the head of Back Creek, with a turning basin of the same depth, 150 feet long and 200 feet wide. 10. Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 7, 1986 Sec 107 LOWER THOROFARE, DEAL ISLAND, MD A channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, from Tangier Sound to the wharves at Wenona; widening the angles and the end to furnish anchorage basins. Modified to provide a channel 60 feet wide, 7 feet deep from Tangier Sound to and inlcuding a mooring basin 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, 300 feet long, in the marsh at the head of the cove at Wenona. Constructing a stone breakwater within Lower Thorofare, and a stone jetty on Deal Island to reduce channel maintenance. NEABSCO CREEK, VA Mar. 3, Channel 100 feet wide and 7 feet deep from that depth in the Potomac River to 1881 Atkinson's Upper Landing and Willis' Wharf. NORTHEAST RIVER, MD Aug. 26, Channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from that depth in the river to the foot of 1937 Church Street in the town of North East, enlarged at its upper end to form a basin 120 feet wide and 300 feet long. OCEAN CITY HARBOR AND INLET AND SINEPUXENT BAY, MD Aug. 30, Construction of an inlet between the Atlantic Ocean and Sinepuxent Bay, 10 feet 19353 deep and 200 feet wide, protected by jetties; a channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the inlet to Ocean City, 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide to Green Point, and 100 feet wide into Chincoteague Bay. Aug. 30, Modification providing a 10-foot by 100-foot channel from the inlet to the west 19354 side of the bay with two turning basins; a channel 6 feet deep and 125 feet wide from the inlet channel to opposite North 8th Street, Ocean City, and 75 feet wide into Isle of Wight Bay. Sep. 3, Modification providing for raising the north jetty to an elevation 9 feet above 19455 mean low water, and a channel 300 feet wide and 16 feet deep from the ocean through the inlet to the Isle of Wight Bay Channel, thence 200 feet to the project harbor, and a depth of 14 feet in the project harbor. Channel depths refer to project datum. POTOMAC & ANACOSTIA RIVERS, DC, COLLECTION & REMOVAL OF DRIFT Oct. 27, Collection and removal of drift from waters of the Potomac and Anacostia 1985 Rivers and their tributaries in the Washington, DC area from the head of the tidewater to Mount Vernon, VA. H. Doc. 159 84th Cong., 1st Sess. 2 Detailed Project Report July 18, 1985 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 35, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 580, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess.2 H. Doc. 76, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 238, 76th Cong., Ist Sess.1 Detailed Project Report Mar. 8, 1984 H. Ex. Doc. 41, 46th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 248, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 72nd Cong., 1st. Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 60, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 444, 82nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 286, 89th Cong., Ist Sess. 4-36 9. 11. 12. 13. 14. BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. POTOMAC RIVER AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, MD, VA, AND DC Jul. 2, Control of Hydrilla and other nuisance plants using mechanical harvesting to 1986 clear a 60 foot wide, 6 foot deep connecting channel from open waters to eligible public use areas. POTOMAC RIVER AT ALEXANDRIA, VA Jun. 25, A channel 6,700 feet long and averages 300 feet wide for depth of 24 feet in 1910 front of Alexandria between the through channel and a line drawn 20 feet outside of established pierhead line. POTOMAC RIVER BELOW WASHINGTON, DC Mar. 3, A channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide between mouth at Chesapeake Bay 1899 and Giesboro Point at Washington, DC, a distance of 108 miles. PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIONS AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS, BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD Aug. 30, Continuous patrol and inspection of Baltimore Harbor, Chesapeake Bay, and its 1935 tributaries to prevent and detect violations, and issue permits as required for transporting and depositing waste materials in navigable waters. (The project is limited to the tidal waters of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries that lie within the State of Maryland.) ROCK HALL HARBOR, MD Aug. 26, Channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from that depth in Swan Point Inlet to a 1937 channel of the same dimensions, 700 feet in length parallel to the harbor terminals at Rock Hall; an anchorage basin of the same depth 100 feet wide and about 800 feet long in northwesterly extention of the channel fronting the harbor terminals; and twin breakwaters at the harbor entrance. Jun. 30, Deepening the approach channel to 10 feet and widening to 100 feet from the 1948 10-foot contour in Swan Creek Inlet to the existing channel parellel to the harbor terminals; deepening to 10 feet and widening to 100 feet the existing channel parallel to the harbor terminals; deepening to 10 feet the eastern 250 feet of the present basin; deepening to 8 feet the western 350 feet of the present basin; and a new anchorage basin 600 feet long, 200 feet wide and 8 feet deep attached to and extending from the west end of the existing basin. May 29, Raising the existing west and east breakwaters from four feet to seven feet above 1980 mean low water and extending the west breakwater 400 feet at an elevation of Sec. 107 seven feet above mean low water; relocating the existing entrance channel at a Jul. 14, depth of 8 feet and width of 100 feet; a new channel, 8 feet deep and 100 feet 1960 wide, from the new entrance channel to the existing anchorage basin; a new channel, 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, from the end of the existing channel near the County wharf to and including an anchorage basin, 250 feet square, in the eastern end of the harbor. TEDIOUS CREEK, MD Jun. 25, Construction of two shore-attached breakwaters with a crest height of +6 feet in 1996 order to provide storm protection for commercial vessels in Tedious Creek. Sec. 107 TWITCH COVE AND BIG THOROFARE, MD A channel 4 feet deep and 25 feet wide from Tangier Sound into Big Thorofare River, and one of same dimensions around point between said river and Tyler River. 4-37 State Design Memorandum July 2, 1986 H. Doc. 1253, 60th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 33, 52nd Cong., 1st Sess. River and Harbor Act, June 28, 1888 as amended by Public Law 85-802, dated August 28, 1959 H. Doc. 204, 75 Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 273, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. l Detailed Project Report, December 1978 Detailed Project Report, March 1995 H. Doc. 285, 62nd Cong., 2nd Sess. 21. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC Aug. 30, Provides for: (a) Virginia Channel, from Giesboro Point to area for 25,000 1935 square feet; (b) Washington Channel, from Haines Point to head of Washington Channel, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide; (c) Anacostia River from Giesboro Point to Anacostia Bridge, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with turning basin 800 feet wide and about 2,400 feet long of same depth opposite Naval Weapons Plant, (d) Anacostia River from Anacostia Bridge 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide to turning basin 400 feet square of same depth at foot of 15th Street SE Channel lengths including turning basins are: Virginia Channel, 25,000 feet; Washington Channel, 10,000 feet; and Anacostia River, 15,000 feet; and (e) operation and maintenance of inlet gates and lock and outlet gates of Tidal Basin constructed under a previous project to flush Washington Channel. 23. Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 WICOMICO RIVER, MD Channel 9 feet deep from Main Street Bridge to about 2 miles below. Extend 9-foot depth into north prong from Main Street Bridge to the Salisbury Dam and turning basin. Extend 9-foot depth into south prong to head of navigation at Cathell Street, including a turning basin, and extend project down to mouth of river in Monie Bay. A 12-foot channel below the Main Street Bridge. A 14-foot channel, 150 feet wide; depths of 14 feet in the north and south prongs and a basin 6 feet deep at Webster Cove and approach channel thereto of the same depth. Sep. 3, Enlarge existing basin at Webster Cove, by dredging an extension 6 feet deep, 1954 100 feet wide, and 200 feet long on each side of existing basin to form a Tshaped harbor. ATLANTIC COAST OF MARYLAND Nov. 17, Consists of a dune beginning at 27th Street extending north to the Delaware line; 1986 a steel sheetpile bulkhead from 27th Street south to Fourth Street; and widened and raised beach from Third Street to just beyond the Delaware line. BROAD TOP REGION, PA Oct. 31, Pilot program to develop and carry out a watershed reclamation and protection, 1992 and wetlands creation and restoration project using innovative reclamation technologies for the purposes of restoring, maintaining and protecting surface and ground water, including municipal water supplies, from adverse impacts related to acid mine drainage and other runoff. Sec. 581 Provided for non-Federal sponsor credit for design and construction prior to of WRDA PCA execution; allowed for Federal share of project costs to be provided in the 1996 form of grants or reimbursement of project costs. CUMBERLAND, MD, AND RIDGELEY, WV Jun. 22, Levees, retaining walls, movable dam, and channel clearing for Cumberland, 1936 West Cumberland and South Cumberland, MD and Ridgeley, WV. Jul. 24, Levees, wall, channel improvement, remove Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Dam 1946 and construct new industrial dam. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 22, 74th Cong., I st Sess. 2 H. Doc. 20, 51st Cong., Ist Sess., and Annual Report 1890, p. 9 47 H. Doc. 569, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1509, 63rd Cong., 3rd Sess. Senate Committee Print, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. 2 H. Doc. 619, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess.2 Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Sept. 29, 1981 P.L. 102-580 P.L. 104-303 H. Doc. 101, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. Report on file in Office, Chief of Engineers 4-38 22. 27. 28. 29. BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD AND WV Construction of Bloomington Lake project. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. Jun. 4, 1993 PAXTON CREEK, PA Provides for an improved flood warning system. PETERSBURG, WV Nov. 28, Channel improvements, levee and floodwall, closures, relocations, and improve- 1990 ments to the flood warning system. 37. RAYSTOWN LAKE, RAYSTOWN BRANCH, JUNIATA RIVER, PA Oct. 23, Construction of dam and appurtenant facilities. 1962 SCRANTON, LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA Provides for 5,800 feet of earth levee, 1,700 feet of concrete floodwall, 3 closure Oct. 31, structures, interior drainage facilities, 2,700 feet of gabion slope protection, an 1992 improved flood warning system, removal of a railroad bridge, access ramp, and associated cultural mitigation. Directs Secretary to carry out the project for Plot and Green Ridge sections and Modified allows non-Federal interest to participate in the financing of the project in by Act of accordance with Section 903(c) of WRDA 86. Oct. 12, 1996 SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENT 39. IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Oct. 31, Pilot program for providing environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 1992 South Central Pennsylvania. Modified Expanded scope to include 15 counties; increased program authorization limits by Acts of to $50 million; provided for non-Federal sponsor credit for design and con- Nov. 13, struction prior to PCA execution; allowed for Federal share of project costs to 1995 be provided in the form of grants or reimbursement of project costs; and provided the non-Federal sponsors to receive credit for reasonable interest to provide non-Federal share of project's cost. LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PA Oct. 23, Construction of Aylesworth Creek Lake, Fall Brook Lake, and local protection 1962 works on Lackawanna River at Scranton, Pennsylvania. LOCK HAVEN, PA Consists of 36,600 feet of levee and 1,000 feet of concrete floodwall along the West Branch and Bald Eagle Creek, five closure structures, seven ponding areas, a sanitary pumping station, 35 gravity type drainage structures, necessary road and utility relocations, non-structural measures for Woodward and Allison Townships, and minor recreation facilities. MOOREFIELD, WV Nov. 28, Levee, floodwall, closures, relocations and improvements to the flood warning 1990 system. OLYPHANT, LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA Oct. 31, Provides for 3,800 feet of earth levee, 1,400 feet of concrete floodwall, a closure 1992 structure, interior drainage facilities, 1,500 feet of gabion slope protection and associated cultural mitigation and environmental restoration. P.L. 104-46 4-39 H. Doc. 469, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 141, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 187, 98th Cong. Report of the Chief of Engineers dated July 23, 1990 Report of the Chief of Engineers dated June 29, 1992 Detailed Project Report, March 1991 Report of the Chief of Engineers dated June 29, 1990 H. Doc. 565, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. Report of the Chief of Engineers dated June 29, 1992 P.L. 104-303 P.L. 102-580 35. 36. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 4-B (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized Oct. 12, Increased program authorization to $80 million and allowed for more non- P.L. 104-303 1996 Federal credits. Energy & water devlpmt. Approp. Act of 1998 Jun. 22, 1936 modified by Acts of Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941; Dec. 22, 1944; May 17, 1950; and Jul. 3, 1959 Added six counties to the program area. P.L. 105-62 SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Construction of detention reservoirs and related flood control works for protection of Binghamton, Hornell, Corning and other towns in New York and Pennsylvania. STILLWATER LAKE, LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA Aug. 18, Construction of a flood control reservoir. 1941 SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NY AND PA Jul. 3, Construction of Cowanesque and Tioga-Hammond reservoirs, local flood pro- 1958 tection works at Elkland, PA, and Nichols, NY and channel improvement at Cortland, NY. Oct. 22, Modification in connection with the construction of Cowanesque Lake to relo- 1976 cate the Town of Nelson, PA, to a new townsite. Mar. 1, Modification of Cowanesque Lake to include water supply as provided by Sec- 1983 tion 4 of the Flood Control Act of 1944 (PL 78-534) and Section 301 of Water Supply Act of 1958 (PL 85-500). Sep. 3, 1954 WEST BRANCH OF SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PA Construction of three flood control reservoirs. 44. WYOMING VALLEY, PA (LEVEE RAISING) Nov. 17, Modification provides for raising existing levees and floodwalls between 3 and 5 1986 feet, modifying closure structures, relocating utilities and providing some new floodwalls and levees to maintain the integrity of the existing flood control system. 45. YORK, INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA Jun. 22, Construction of Indian Rock Dam and channel improvements on Codorus Creek. 1936 49. ANACOSTIA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, MD AND DC Oct. 12, The project consists of two wetland restoration sites in the District of Columbia, 1996 one stream restoration site and one stormwater wetland site in Prince George's County, and nine stream restoration and stormwater wetland sites in Montgomery County. The project will restore a total of 80 acres of tidal and non-tidal freshwater wetlands, 5 miles of piedmont streams, and 33 acres of bottomland hardwood forest within the highly urbanized Anacostia River watershed. H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 394, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 29, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. Report of the Chief of Engineers dated October 19, 1983 H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated November 15, 1994 4-40 Documents 40. 41. 42. 43. BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 50. CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RECOVERY, MD Nov. 17, Contributes to multi-agency and private efforts to restore oyster populations in 1986 the Maryland portion of the Chesapeake Bay. 51. POPLAR ISLAND, MARYLAND Oct. 12, The project consists of reconstructing Poplar Island to its approximate size in Report of the 1996 1847 (1,110 acres), using an estimated 38 million cubic yards of uncontam- Secretary of the inated dredged material from maintenance dredging of the southern approach Army, dated channels of the Baltimore harbor and Channels navigation project. September 3, 1996 52. ROOSTER ISLAND, DORCHESTER COUNTY, MD WRDA The project consists of reconstructing Rooster Island, using approximately 1986 28,000 cubic yards of dredged material from Cambridge Harbor and placed on Sec. an upland site to construct 6 acres of wetlands protected by a 2,100-foot break- 1135 water. 1. Exclusive of portion considered inactive. Inactive portion is widening 35-foot depth channel from 150 to 400 feet from Port Covington to Ferry Bar, widening 27-foot depth channel from 150 to 250 feet to Hanover Street Bridge, and providing a channel 27 feet deep by 250 feet wide to Western Maryland Railway Bridge with an anchorage and turning basin at the upper end. 2. Contains latest published maps. 3. Included in Public Works Administration program September 16, 1993. The site chosen for the inlet under this authorization was opened just south of Ocean City by natural forces during a severe storm in August 1933. This eliminated the necessity for an 8-foot channel from the inlet to Ocean City. 4. Included in Emergency Relief Program 1935. 5. Raising of the north jetty to an elevation of 9 feet above mean low water was accomplished with maintenance funds in 1956. 4-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 4-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1998 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Accotink Creek, VA1 Completed 1878 $ 5,000 $ - Anacostia River and Flats2 Deferred 1953 3,910,582 Annapolis Harbor, MD Completed 1993 34,2503 51,366 Aquia Creek, VA Inactive 1928 52,4654 11,770 Back Creek, MD Completed 1946 23,061 41,378 Black Walnut Harbor, MD Completed 1982 32,631 431,478 Bonum Creek, VA Completed 1993 202,0005 465,038 Branson Cove, Lower Machodoc River, VA Completed 1950 15,755 35,684 Breton Bay, MD 6 Completed 1950 47,9246 47,593 Broad Creek River, DE Completed 1964 64,5107 163,482 Cambridge Harbor, MD Completed 1993 195,9748 958,912 Choptank River, MD9 Completed 1979 96,796 104,230 Claiborne Harbor, MDI Deferred 1987 42,974 709,096 Corsica River, MD Completed 1948 39,07110 134,770 Cypress Creek, MD Completed 1947 3,057 14,729 Duck Point Cove, MD Completed 1982 25,289 353,188 Elk and Little Elk Rivers, MD11 Completed 1932 90,12112 53,80813 Goose Creek, MD14 Completed 1973 75,900 22,062 Herring Creek, MD Completed 1989 1,506,259 170,936 Island Creek, MD Completed 1997 696,650 716,010 Knapps Narrows, MD Completed 1996 46,121 3,004,001 La Trappe, MD Completed 1980 8,06415 40,475 Little Creek, Kent Island, MD Completed 1958 23,000 7,327 Little Wicomico River, MD Completed 1996 81,88542 2,339,948 Lowes Wharf, MD Completed 1986 2,100 330,681 Lower Machodoc Creek, VA Completed 1904 9,916 30,432 Madison Bay, MD14 Completed 1977 125,550 33,353 Manokin River, MD1 7 Completed 1919 34,78818 43,534 Middle River and Dark Head Creek, MD Completed 1947 38,71519 61,383 Monroe Bay and Creek, VA Completed 1994 22,434 483,685 Muddy Hook/Tyler Coves, MD Completed 1996 64,001 687,568 Nan Cove, MD4 Completed 1965 34,86120 33,138 Nanticoke River, MD Completed 1995 73,242 619,526 Nanticoke River, DEL and MD Completed 1995 143,13421 1,156,399 Nanticoke River at Bivalve, MD Completed 1983 240,817 142,131 Neale Sound, MD Completed 1991 12,60022 944,099 Neavitt Harbor, MD14 Completed 1968 36,500 34,533 Nomini Bay and Creek, VA23 Completed 1946 78,446 42,063 Occoquan Creek, VA11 Completed 1971 66,25324 203,198 Parish Creek, MD Completed 1988 19,17025 533,808 Patuxent River, MD11 Completed 1905 14,00026 Pocomoke River, MD Completed 1995 191,72627 3,457,117 Potomac River at Mount Vernon, MD28 Completed 1993 17,000 343,465 Potomac River and Tributaries at and below Washington, DC, Elimination of Waterchestnut Completed 1977 - 184,394 Potomac River at Lower Cedar Point, MD Completed 1920 10,234 6,216 Potomac River North Side of Washington Channel, DCI Completed 1956 1,744,69229 27,46130 Queenstown Harbor, MD Completed 1985 72,85831 321,803 Rhodes Point to Tylerton, MD Completed 1995 304,000 2,403,361 Shad Landing State Park, MD Completed 1966 33,53133 19,198 Shallow Creek, MD14 Completed 1989 278,100 Slaughter Creek, MD Completed 1994 4,140 671,262 St. Catherine's Sound, MD Completed 1989 29,94734 659,369 St. George's Creek, MD Completed 1985 147,650 4-42 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1998 For Last Full Report See Annual "Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance St. Jerome's Creek, MD Completed 1991 44,35735 759,067 St. Michael's Harbor, MD14 Completed 1964 16,72336 30,691 St. Patrick's Creek, MD Completed 1987 15,752 151,849 St. Peter's Creek, MD 14 Completed 1963 46,74037 39,964 Smith Creek, MD Completed 1936 5,252 16,448 Susquehanna River above and below Havre De Grace, MD Completed 1985 293,57038 849,350 Susquehanna River at Williamsport, PA14 Completed 1974 57,03139 41,437 Tilghman Island Harbor, MD Completed 1996 424,800 464,788 Town Creek, MD Completed 1950 43,220 56,868 Tred Avon River, MD Completed 1994 523,310 915,239 Tuckahoe River, MD Completed 1980 9,727 23,489 Tyaskin Creek, MD Completed 1923 16,29740 54,302 Upper Machodoc Creek, VA Completed 1971 20,281 40,283 Upper Thorofare, MD Completed 1987 62,446 829,515 Warwick River, MD Completed 1984 22,04141 148,728 1. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized August 5, 1977. 2. Project deferred for restudy. 3. Includes $8,476 for previous projects. 4. Includes $31,065 for previous project. 5. Excludes $3,998 contributed funds. 6. Includes $37,500 for previous project. 7. Includes $50,000 for previous project. 8. Excludes $3,998 contributed funds and includes $61,321 for previous projects. 9. Authorization for the unconstructed portion of the project was withdrawn by the Chief of Engineers January 22, 1979. 10. Includes $30,000 for previous project. 11. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized November 2, 1979. 12. Includes $79,626 for previous project and excludes $8,414 contributed funds. 13. Includes $24,321 for previous project. 14. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 15. Excludes $1,100 contributed funds. 16. Abandonment recommended in 1926 (H. doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Sess.) 17. Includes $2,000 expended outside project limits. 18. Excludes $111,581 expended by Navy Department and $52,000 from contributed funds. 19. Excludes $565 contributed funds. 20. Includes $5,000 for previous project. 21. Excludes $1,000 contributed funds. 22. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized November 6, 1977. 23. Includes $25,000 for previous project. 24. Includes $19,170 Works Progress Administration funds. 25. Includes $10,617 for previous project. 26. Unconstructed portion of the project is inactive. Includes $20,500 for previous project. 27. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized November 2, 1979. 28. Excludes $389,000 contributed funds. 29. Excludes $101,162 Public Health Service funds expended for waterchestnut removal. 30. Includes $19,000 for previous project. 31. Includes $46,121 public works funds. 32. Excludes $24,125 contributed funds. 33. Excludes $600 contributed funds. 34. Includes $26,500 for previous project. 35. Excludes $600 contributed funds. 36. Excludes $6,984 contributed funds. 37. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized November 6, 1977. Includes $22,905 Works Progress funds and $97,390 for previous project. 38. Excludes $40,000 contributed funds. 39. Excludes $10,158 contributed funds. 40. Includes $6,000 for previous project. 41. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 4-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 4-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1998 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Colonial Beach, MD Complete 1995 $ 649,9571 Oxford, MD2 Complete 1978 $ 97,7503 Punch Island Road, MD Complete 1996 $ 199,105 Town of North Beach, MD Complete 1995 $ 450,6104 1. Excludes $414,977 contributed funds. 3. Excludes $80,648 contributed funds. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 4. Excludes $245,262 contributed funds. TABLE 4-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1998 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Anacostia River and Tributaries, Flood Protection and Navigation Improvements, DC and MD Anacostia River and Tributaries, Prince Georges Co., MD2 Bainbridge, NY3,4 Bath, NY 5 Bayard, WV4 Black Walnut Point, MD Bridgewater, VA4 Bull Run, PA Chesapeake Bay at Hoopersville Road, MD Conklin-Kirkwood, NY4 Cortland, NY8 Elkland, PA Endicott Johnson City and Vestal, NY Forest Heights, MD4 Fourmile Run, VA Hills Point Road, Dorchester Co., MD3 Greene, NY4 Kingston-Edwardsville, PA Kitzmiller, MD4 Isle of Wight Bay, Ocean City, MD4 Latta Brook Rd., NY McCready's Point Road, MD Middle Hooper Island, MD Nichols, NY Norwich, NY4 Painted Post, NY 5 Plymouth, PA Savage River Dam, MD Scranton, PA17 Spring Brook Creek, Pittston Township, PA Solomon Creek, Ashley Borough, Luzerne County, PA Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1995 $ 6,042,325 1977 1959 1970 1965 1985 1953 1984 1993 1955 1970 1971 1979 1964 1987 1989 1951 1979 1965 1992 1984 1993 1993 1974 1950 1970 1958 1954 1971 1993 1993 $ 1,000,0003 382,000 638,332 55,2186 200,500 136,500 2,742,000 156,4917 71,000 324,486 1,297,850 7,034,5349 430,00010 52,480,000 186,077 37,000 4,731,39411 501,50012 972,988 115,500 74,01913 327,16514 1,487,800 94,500 414,181 1,911,68915 2,271,93916 2,006,800 425,96018 70,44119 4-44 $3,735,9791 33,999 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1998 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Solomons Island, Calvert County, MD Completed 1993 126,04920 Sunbury, PA Completed 1953 6,063,00021 Swoyersville-Forty Fort, PA Completed 1968 2,728,113 Tunkhannock Creek, Tunkhannock, PA Completed 1991 174,49122 Tyrone, PA2 3 Deferred 1980 6,401,016 Unadilla, NY Completed 1970 1,000,00024 Upper Marlboro, MD4 Completed 1965 590,013 Verona Lake, VA2 5 Deferred 1978 992,000 Washington, DC and Vicinity Completed 1953 331,92726 Wilkes-Barre, Hanover Township, PA Completed 1958 3,853,45727 Williamsport, PA Completed 1979 12,964,89328 Wyoming Valley, PA Completed 1987 25,549,098 1. Includes $49,998 emergency relief funds. 2. Local interests will not accept operation and maintenance responsibility of the project until the severe erosion and sedimentation of the project caused by tropical storm Eloise is corrected and the project is restored to design condition. 3. Excludes $357,022 contributed funds. 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 5. Unit of Southern New York Flood Control Projects. 6. Excludes $182,672 Public Works Acceleration funds and $4,290 contributed funds. 7. Excludes $67,954 Contributed funds. 8. Unit of Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects. 9. Excludes $154,694 contributed funds. 10. Excludes $87,720 contributed funds. 11. Includes $1,162,548 emergency relief funds and excludes $225,877 emergency relief funds expended prior to adoption of project. 12. Excludes $6,616 contributed funds. 13. Excludes $42,081 contributed funds. 14. Excludes $137,900 contributed funds. 15. Includes $4,357 emergency relief funds. 16. Includes $200,000 expended from contributed funds. 17. Unit of Lackawanna River Basin Projects. 18. Excludes $126,225 contributed funds. 19. Excludes $25,014 contributed funds. 20. Excludes $51,666 contributed funds. 21. Excludes $140,504 contributed funds. 22. Excludes $53,383 contributed funds. 23. The unconstructed portion of the project was reclassified to the deferred category January 8, 1981. 24. Excludes $132,578 contributed funds. 25. Authorized for the design memorandum state of advanced engineering and design. 26. Cost of previous project. Includes $1 06,500 emergency relief funds. 27. Includes $872,715 emergency relief funds. Excludes $36,375 emergency relief funds expended for new work before adoption of project. 28. Includes $1,887 emergency relief funds and excludes $110,835 contributed funds. 4-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 4-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Almond Village, NY1 ,2 Baltimore Harbor & Channels, MD (Ferry Bar & Spring Garden Channel) Betterton Harbor, MD Breton Bay, MD (1902 River & Harbor Act) Broadwater Creek, MD Cadle Creek, MD2 Cambridge Harbor, MD (1948 River & Harbor Act) Channel Connecting Plain Dealing Creek and Oak Chester River, MD (1873 River & Harbor Act) Coan River, VA Copes Corner Lakes, NY 2 Cuckold Creek, MD4 Cunninghill Cove, MD4 1970 1920 1960 1950 1949 1949 1989 1940 1988 1937 1970 1978 1977 Curwensville Lake (WaterLine), PA5 Davenport Center Lake, NY2 1970 Endicott, Johnson City, and Vestal (Remedial), NY5 Fall Brook Lake, PA6 Genegantslet Lake, NY Governors Run, MD 1970 1954 1950 May 26, 1953 1941 Flood Control Act Nov. 17, 1986 1966 Water Reg. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1914 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Jan. 22, 1979 1960 River and Harbor Act Jan 22, 1979 1960 River and Harbor Act Nov. 18, 1991 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 18, 1991 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 4-46 $ 24,6223 787,710 3,482 10,424 212 112 25,419 106,7003 5,720 11,200 286,4003 46,100 214,5783 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Harpers Ferry, WV Hellens Creek, MD Lake Ogleton, MD Marsh Creek Bridge, Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, PA5 Mill Creek, MD Moorefield, WV Neabsco Creek, VA (1881 River & Harbor Act) Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD (1954 River & Harbor Act) Pocomoke River, MD (1945 River & Harbor Act) Pocomoke River, MD & VA (1954 River & Harbor Act) Saint Georges Creek, MD Sixes Bridge Lake, MD & PA7 South Plymouth Lake, NY Susquehanna River, Sunbury Closure Structure, PA7 Waterway from Little Choptank River to Choptank River, MD West Oneonta Lake, NY2 1. Local cooperation withdrawn, project authorization expired May 26, 1958. 2. Unit of Southern New York Flood Control Projects. 3. Cost for preliminary work only. 4. Project authorization was withdrawn by the Chief of Engineers. 5. Project deauthorized by Section 1001(A) of Public Law 99-662. 6. Unit of Lackawanna River Basin Projects. 7. Authorized for the design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design. 4-47 1937 1950 1950 1949 1941 1978 1989 1989 1989 1971 1974 1953 Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 18, 1991 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Oct. 3, 1978 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Sep. 23, 1986 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 29, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 18, 1991 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 7,9283 14,600 100,0363 305 189,1003 1939 1970 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 4-H RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Date Survey Project Completed MARYLAND Breton Bay Jun 1998 Chester River Apr 1998 Crisfield Harbor Jun 1998 Goose Creek Apr 1998 Honga River Sep 1998 Isle of Wight Bay Apr 1998 Island Creek, St. George Island Jul 1998 Knapps Narrows Aug 1998 Nanticoke River Nov 1997 Nanticoke River at Bivalve Nov 1997 Neabsco Creek Dec 1997 Rhodes Point to Tylerton Jul 1998 Sheep Pen Gut Jul 1998 Slaughter Creek Jan 1998 St. Catherine Sound Jun 1998 VIRGINIA Little Wicomico River May 1998 4-48 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT INSPECTION OF COMPLETED PROJECTS Project Date Inspected MARYLAND Anacostia River Basin Cumberland Forest Heights Kitzmiller Upper Marlboro NEW YORK Addison Avoca Bainbridge-Newton Creek Bath-Cohocton River Binghamton Canisteo Cincinnatus Conklin-Kirkwood Coming-Monkey Run Cortland Elmira Endicott-Johnson City & Vestal Greene Hornell Latta Brook Lisle Nichols Norwich Owego Painted Post Port Dickinson Sherburne Unadilla Whitney Point PENNSYLVANIA Ashley Elkland Hanover Kingston-Edwardsville Lock Haven Loyalsock Milton Pittston Plymouth Scranton South Williamsport Sunbury Swoyersville-Forty Fort Tunkhannock Tyrone Wilkes-Barre-Hanover Twp. Williamsport VIRGINIA Bridgewater Fourmile Run District of Columbia & MD Projects Anacostia River Washington, DC & Vicinity October 1997 September 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 4-49 TABLE 4-I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 4-I (Continued) INSPECTION OF COMPLETED PROJECTS Project Date Inspected WEST VIRGINIA Bayard Moorefield Petersburg Ridgeley October 1997 October 1997 October 1997 September 1997 4-50 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT * This district comprises the State of Virginia, except the Potomac, Roanoke, and Ohio River Basins; the entire area on the eastern shore of Virginia except for the project for Pocomoke River, Maryland and Virginia. On the west shore of Chesapeake Bay, all waterways south of Smith Point, VA, at the mouth of the Potomac River except the project for Little Wicomico River, VA. North Carolina, only the Chowan River Basin downstream to and including the mouth of the Meherin River, and the Dismal Swamp Canal Route. of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway to the Albemarle Sound. West Virginia, only the James River Basin. IMPROVEMENTS NAVIGATION 1. Appomattox River, VA 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Bridge at Great Bridge, VA 4. Back River, Poquoson, VA 5. Bennett's Creek, VA 6. Channel to Newport News, VA 7. Chincoteague Inlet, VA 8. Guilford Creek, VA 9. Hampton Roads, VA (Collection and Removal of Drift) 10. James River, VA 11. Jones Creek, VA 12. Lynnhaven Inlet, VA 13. Nandua Creek 14. Newport News Creek, VA 15. Norfolk Harbor and Channels, VA 16. Oyster Channel, VA 17. Parker Creek, VA 18. Rudee Inlet, VA 19. Supervisor of the Harbor of Hampton Roads (Prevention of Obstructive and Injurious Deposits) 20. Thimble Shoal Channel, VA 21. Waterway on the Coast of Virginia 22. York River, VA 23. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization Page BEACH EROSION CONTROL 5-2 5-2 5-3 5-3 5-3 5-3 5-4 5-4 5-4 5-5 5-5 5-6 5-6 5-6 5-6 5-8 5-8 5-8 5-8 5-9 5-9 5-9 5-10 24. Virginia Beach, VA (Hurricane Protection) 25. Virginia Beach, VA (Reimbursement) 26. James R. Olin Flood Control Project, VA 27. Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, VA 28. Richmond Filtration Plant, VA 29. Emergency Flood Control Activities GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 30. Surveys 31. Collection and Study of Basic Data TABLES TABLE 5-A Cost and Financial Statement TABLE 5-B Authorizing Legislation TABLE 5-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects TABLE 5-D Other Authorized Shore Protection Projects TABLE 5-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects TABLE 5-H Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys 5-1 Page 5-10 5-10 5-11 5-11 5-11 5-11 5-11 5-11 5-12 5-16 5-19 5-21 5-21 5-22 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1998 1. APPOMATTOX RIVER, VA Location. This river rises in Appomattox County, VA, flows northeasterly 137 miles, and empties into the James River at Hopewell, VA. The portion under improvement extends from its mouth to Petersburg, VA, a distance of 11 miles, which is the length of the tidal and navigable reach. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12251.) Previous projects. For details see page 469 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. This provides for a channel 80 feet wide and 10 feet deep from the mouth of the river to a point 400 feet above Lieutenant Run; thence 80 feet wide and of such depth, not exceeding 10 feet, as can be obtained without rock excavation to the head of navigation at Petersburg; including a basin at the mouth of Poes Run 200 feet long, 150 feet wide, and 20 feet deep; and a turning basin at the mouth of Lieutenant Run 500 feet long, 140 to 160 feet wide, and 12 feet deep in the upper 300 feet, the removal of rock to a depth of 18 feet in the north half of the lower 200 feet, and removal of soft material to rock in the south half of the lower 200 feet of this basin. All depths are referred to mean low water. The project also provides for a dam at Petersburg and the excavation for a width of from 200 to 300 feet of a diversion channel connecting the river above the dam with the river at a point 2.5 miles below; for about 1.7 miles of levees on the low grounds between the navigable and the diversion channels; for a highway bridge and a railway bridge across the diversion channel; and for other work incidental to the diversion channel. Under ordinary conditions the mean tidal range is 2.9 feet and the extremes 2.4 and 2.3 feet. There are no records available of the heights of stage due to ordinary floods.. These are estimated at 6 to 8 feet above mean low water at Petersburg, where the extremes are from 15.6 feet to 17.1 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 212 of Annual Report for 1969. Terminal facilities. There are about 2,500 feet of wooden bulkhead and a shore landing in Petersburg Harbor. These facilities are in an abandoned, dilapidated condition and have not been used by commercial traffic on the river since 1950. There are two large recreational facilities now in operation on the Appomattox River. One is located about 2 miles downstream from Petersburg, VA, and the other is at Hopewell, VA, near the confluence of the Appomattox and the James. Operations during fiscal year. Work consisted of coordination and technical assistance to the city of Petersburg in their efforts to secure a site for placing contaminated dredged material. 2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA, AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (NORFOLK DISTRICT) Location. Two inland water routes approximately paralleling Atlantic coast south of Norfolk, VA ,between a point in Southern Branch of Elizabeth River, VA, 2,500 feet upstream of Norfolk & Western Railway bridge and Virginia- North Carolina state line in North Landing River, a distance of 27.2 miles; and 64.6 miles between mouth of Deep Creek, VA, and mouth of Pasquotank River, NC. These routes are shown on National Ocean Service Chart 12206. Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 90 to 250 feet wide following southern Branch of Elizabeth River, 5.2 miles, Virginia Land Cut, 8.3 miles, and North Landing River, 13.7 miles; and construction of tidal guard lock at Great Bridge, VA. It also provides channels 10 feet deep at mean low water and 90 to 100 feet wide in Deep Creek, 3.1 miles, Turners Cut, 4.3 miles and Pasquotank River, 35.1 miles; maintaining Dismal Swamp Canal, 22.1 miles, to about 9 feet deep mean canal level over a width of 50 feet; protection of banks in Turners Cut with sheet piling, and cutting curtain sharp points in Pasquotank River to shorten its course. (See Table 5-C at end of chapter on Data Relative to Completed Locks included in Project.) Project includes operating and care of completed locks, dams and bridges. Southern Branch of Elizabeth River and Deep Creek sections of the two routes are tidal, mean range being about 3 feet with extremes of minus 3.5 and plus 9.6 feet. Remaining sections are non-tidal with fluctuations of 1 to 2 feet in level due to winds. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. See Annual Report for FY 1970. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work consisted of operation and ordinary maintenance of the project consisting of real estate management services, condition and operation studies. Operation and care of locks, bridges, spillways, wharves, canal equipment, grounds, roads, buildings, etc. performed by contract. For the A & C Canal, a contract was awarded to REHAB Federal Systems at North Landing Bridge and Great Bridge in FY 96 and is in progress in FY 97. For the Dismal Swamp Canal, a contract was 5-2 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT awarded in FY 96 and completed to replace valves at Deep Creek and South Mills Spillways. A second contract to paint bridges at Deep Creek and South Mills was completed in FY 96. A contract to replace bulkheads at Lake Drummond Spillway was also awarded and substantially completed in FY 96. A contract to Rehab Lake Drummond Office was awarded in FY 96 and under construction in FY 97. 3. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BRIDGE AT GREAT BRIDGE, VA Location. The project is located in the city of Chesapeake, in the southeastern portion of VA. The city is bordered by the city of Suffolk on the west, the cities of Norfolk and Portsmouth on the North, the city of Virginia Beach on the east, and North Carolina on the south. The federally owned Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway highway bridge crosses the Albermarle and Chesapeake Canal in the community of Great Bridge. Existing project. The plan of improvement includes replacement of the existing 55-year old, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2-lane swing bridge with a 5-lane, double-leaf, rolling-lift bascule bridge, 2000 LF of approach roadway, utility relocations, and removal of the existing bridge. Local cooperation. The local sponsor (city of Chesapeake) is required to assume OMRR&R responsibility on project completion in accordance with the provisions described in Section 339 of the National Highway System Designation Act of 1995. (P.L. 104-59) Operations during fiscal year. The feasibility report was approved in Jul 94. Pre-construction engineering and design was initiated during FY 95 and completed in FY 97. Project Cooperation Agreement signing is scheduled for April 1998. Federal acquisition of real estate and rights-of-way are in progress. Contract award scheduled 4th quarter FY 99. 4. BACK RIVER, POQUOSON, VA Continuing Feasibility Phase 5. BENNETT'S CREEK, VA Location. Bennetts Creek is a tidal estuary of the Nansemond River wholly within the city of Suffolk, VA. It is about 3 miles in length, flows in a northern direction, and empties into the Nansemond River at its juncture with the James River. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12248.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from the 6 foot contour in the Nansemond River to the 6 foot contour within the mouth of Bennetts Creek, and extending upstream to the city boat ramp at Bennetts Creek Park, a distance of approximately 2.4 miles. Mean tidal range is 2.8 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. City of Suffolk, VA is the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. A privately owned commercial dock and berthing facility on the east side of the creek at the U.S. Route 17 bridge, and a public boat ramp and parking area at the city park, are adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging was performed 2 through 12 December 1997 by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Special Purpose Dredge CURRITUCK, resulting in the removal on approximately 14,000 cubic yards from the channel at the mouth of Bennetts Creek. 6. CHANNEL TO NEWPORT NEWS, VA Location. West of north entrance to Norfolk Harbor Channel, connects deep water in James River with Hampton Roads. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12245.) Existing project. A channel 55 feet deep at mean low water and 800 feet wide from Norfolk Harbor Channel in Hampton Roads to Newport News, a distance of about 4.5 miles, and two deep-draft anchorage berths opposite Newport News 45 feet deep over a 1,200-foot swinging radius. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.7 feet and extremes 2.1 and 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuations due to combined wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for dredging the channel to an intermediate depth of 50 feet, which was completed December 2, 1988. The local sponsor (Virginia Port Authority) is required to furnish cost sharing in accordance with the provisions described in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended, for additional deepening. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 11, (Revised 1993) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by the Water Resources Support Center. Operations during fiscal year. A contract to maintenance dredge the Channel to Newport News was awarded in September 1998, with work continuing into FY 1999. Other work on the project consisted of condition surveys of the channel performed during April and May 1998. 7. CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA Location. Chincoteague Inlet at the southern end of Assateague Island provides access to the Atlantic Ocean from 5-3 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1998 the inland waterway near the town of Chincoteague, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart 12211.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar in the Atlantic Ocean and to the mouth of the inlet, a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the inlet through the canal, and then along Chincoteague Channel to a point approximately 2,000 feet north of the state highway bridge to Chincoteague, a distance of about 6.6 miles. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet. All depths are referred to mean low water. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see Annual Report for 1974. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities at Chincoteague are considered adequate for current and prospective traffic. Operations during fiscal year. A contract to dredge the outer channel was awarded in June 1997, and completed in October 1997, with a total of 122,889 cubic yards removed. A contract to dredge the inner channel was awarded in June 1998, and the work was completed in August 1998; a total of 17,352 cubic yards was removed from the inner channel. A contract to dredge the outer channel was awarded in July 1998, and the work was completed in August 1998; a total of 72,592 cubic yards was removed from the outer channel. Other work on the project included environmental monitoring of the overboard dredged material placement site for the inner channel and condition surveys. 8. GUILFORD CREEK, VA Location. Guilford Creek is located in Accomack County, VA, near the communities of Guilford and Parksley, VA, and is a tributary to the Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12225.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide over a length of about 1.0 mile, from Beasley Bay into Guilford Creek, and including a turning basin 6 feet deep and 100 feet square. The project also includes construction of a rock groin approximately 100 feet long at the dredged material placement site. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. County of Accomack, VA, is the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. Existing terminal facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Work consisted of monitoring the dredged material placement area and coordinating with the local sponsor to plant the placement area with wetland species for environmental enhancement. 9. HAMPTON ROADS, VA COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Hampton Roads is a natural harbor 300 miles south of New York and 180 miles south of Washington, DC. Its principal tributaries are the James River, affording a natural deep harbor at Newport News, VA; Elizabeth River, with its Southern, Eastern, and Western Branches providing harbors for Norfolk and Portsmouth, VA; and Hampton Creek, serving the harbor at Hampton, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12248,12245 and 12253.) Existing project. Collection and removal of drift in Hampton Roads and its tributary waters authorizes the Secretary of the Army to allot necessary amounts of work from appropriations for main-other available appropriations and that this work shall be carded on as a separate and distinct project. It is wholly a work of maintenance. The purpose of work is to afford relief from variable conditions of obstruction. No advance estimate of the amount of work is required. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Norfolk Harbor, VA, and Channel to Newport News, VA. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of the project resulted in collection and disposal of a variety of floating refuse. Operations were performed using government plant and hired labor. 10. JAMES RIVER, VA Location. The river is formed by the junction of the Cowpasture and Jackson Rivers in Botetourt County, VA, flows east 340 miles and empties into Hampton Roads at Newport News, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12248 and 12251.) Existing project. A channel 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the mouth to Richmond Deepwater Terminal, and a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide from the Deepwater terminal to Richmond Lock, a mooring basin 35 feet deep, 180 to 220 feet wide and 2,100 feet long alongside the channel opposite waterfront at Hopewell; enlargement of the turning basin at Richmond Deepwater Terminal to 825 feet wide, 2,770 feet long and 35 feet deep; a turning basin in Richmond Harbor 200 feet wide, 600 feet long and 18 feet deep; and construction of spur and training dikes. Depth of channels is referred to main low water. Total length of 5-4 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT channel included in the project is 91 miles, which is the navigable section. Mean tidal ranges under ordinary conditions for different parts of the river are: mouth, 2.6 feet; Jamestown, 2 feet; City Point, 2.6 feet; and Richmond, 3.2 feet. Spring tide ranges under ordinary conditions at the same localities are mouth, 3.1 feet; Jamestown, 2.4 feet; City Point, 3 feet; Richmond, 3.2 feet. Ordinary fluctuations of stage at Richmond, due to floods are 6 to 12 feet above mean low water. Extreme fluctuations are 16 to 32 feet. Flood heights below Richmond diminish rapidly. The extreme according to available information is about 11 feet lower at Dutch gap, 14 miles below and 17 to 18 feet lower, 20 miles below. For previous projects, see Annual Report for 1938. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for conditions imposed by River and Harbor Act of 1962. However, the local sponsor (Richmond Port Authority) is required to furnish cost sharing in accordance with the provisions described in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended. Deepening the project from 25 feet to 35 feet, and the widening, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1962 has not been started. Terminal facilities. There are city-owned wharves at Richmond Harbor and at Richmond Deepwater Terminal, and numerous private facilities elsewhere on the James River. The Deepwater Terminal is at the head of the 25-foot deep improved channel, and it serves oceangoing vessels and larger ships engaged in coast-wide trading. For detailed information on the terminal facilities on the James River, see Port Series No. 11, (Revised 1993) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by the Water Resources Support Center. Existing terminal facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging was performed under an Indefinite Quantities Contract to remove shoals on several areas of the James River. At Dancing Point - Swann Point Shoal Channel a total of 1,001,726 cubic yards was removed. At Goose Hill Channel a total of 363,714 cubic yards was removed. Between Richmond Deepwater Terminal and Hopewell a total of 124,597 cubic yards was removed. At Richmond Deepwater Terminal a total of 92,560 cubic yards was removed. At Richmond Harbor a total of 85,479 cubic yards was removed. Three upland, dredged material containment areas, at Turkey Island Cutoff, Jones Neck Cutoff and Richmond Deepwater Terminal, were repaired and maintained in preparation for future dredging. Related work performed during the year included condition surveys, environmental and archeological studies, and engineering investigations related to shoaling, river currents and realignments at Turkey Island Cutoff, Goose Hill Channel and Tribell Shoal Channel. 11. JONES CREEK, VA Location. Jones Creek is a tributary to the Pagan River, in Isle of Wight County on the southwest shore of the James River. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12248.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide over a length of about 5,000 feet, from the Pagan River into Jones Creek and as far upstream as the State Highway Route 704 Bridge at Rescue, VA. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. County of Isle of Wight, VA is the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. Existing terminal facilities at Rescue, VA are adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. None. New work dredging of the project was completed during FY 1997. Financial close-out of the new phase of the project was completed during FY 1998. 12. LYNNHAVEN INLET, VA Location. On the south shore of the Chesapeake Bay, 5 miles west of Cape Henry, and 10 miles east of Norfolk, VA, the inlet connects Lynnhaven Roads, a part of the Chesapeake Bay, with a network of inland waters in the northern half of the city of VA Beach. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12254.) Existing project. An entrance channel from Chesapeake Bay through Lynnhaven Inlet, 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide; a mooring and turning basin inside of Lynnhaven Inlet, 10 feet deep, 1,100 feet long, and 750 feet wide; a channel 9 feet deep and 90 feet wide to extend from the mooring and turning basin into Broad Bay via Long Creek-Broad Bay Canal, a side channel from the basin into Long Creek at a depth of 8 feet and width of 100 feet, and a channel through the Narrows connecting Broad and Linkhorn Bays, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide. Mean range of tide in Lynnhaven Inlet is about 2 feet with extreme fluctuations of 1.5 feet below and 9.5 feet above mean low water. Range in Lynnhaven Bay is a little more than 2 feet, in Broad and Linkhorn Bays, fluctuations in water level are caused by local winds. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. The city of Virginia Beach is the local project sponsor. For details see page 308 of Annual Report for 1965. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. For details see page 308 of Annual Report for 1970. Operations during fiscal year. A contract to maintenance dredge the entrance channel, basin, channel to Broad Bay and the Narrows channel was awarded in September 1997, and completed in December 1997; a total of 196,146 cubic yards was removed. The entrance channel was realigned as a result of this dredging contract. 5-5 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1998 13. NANDUA CREEK, VA Location. Nandua Creek is located within the county of Accomack, VA, about ten miles south of Watts Island light, and is a tributary to the Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12226.) Existing project. Provides for channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide across the bar at the mouth of the creek. Mean tide range is about 1.60 feet. Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. Terminal facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. A maintenance dredging contract was prepared and awarded in September 1998; dredging was scheduled to be performed during the following fiscal year. 14. NEWPORT NEWS CREEK, VA Location. On the southern end of the peninsula between the James and York Rivers and within the corporate limits of the city of Newport News. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12245.) Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep and with width varying from 150 to 90 feet, from deep water in Hampton Roads to the municipal boat harbor, and including a turning and anchorage basin at the upper end of the same depth, width varying from 188 to 214 feet, and 500 feet in length. Under a Section 107 modification, a portion of the entrance channel 125 feet wide is being deepened to 18 feet, to connect with the adjacent harbor protected with an Lshaped wave screen. Portions of this harbor are also being deepened to 18 feet under Section 107 authority. Mean range of tide is 2.6 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. The city of Newport News is the local project sponsor. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate, and the local sponsor is constructing a new pier to service commercial vessels. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract awarded in FY 1997 to deepen portions of the entrance channel and adjacent harbor within the L-shaped wave screen to a depth of 18 feet was awarded in August 1997; dredging continued on this contract into FY 1998, and was completed in March 1998. A total of 89,957 cubic yards was removed. 15. NORFOLK HARBOR AND CHANNELS, VA. Location. Norfolk, VA, is 187 miles south of Baltimore, MD, and 30 miles from entrance to Chesapeake Bay at Cape Charles and Cape Henry. Harbor extends 18.3 miles from 40-foot contour in Hampton Roads to a point 2,500 feet above Norfolk and Western Railway bridge over a Southern Branch of Elizabeth River. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12245 and 12253.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For details see Annual Report for 1993. HAMPTON ROADS AND ELIZABETH RIVER: A channel 55 feet deep and 1,500 feet wide from that depth in Hampton Roads to a point approximately 6.3 miles upstream from the Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel; thence 55 feet deep and 800 feet wide to Lamberts Point; thence 45 feet deep and 750 feet wide to the junction of Southern Branch and Eastern Branch. EASTERN BRANCH: A channel 25 feet deep and 500 feet wide from the junction of the branches to Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge, from the Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide to the Campostella Bridge, channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide to the Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge (formerly Virginian), including a turning basin 25 feet deep and approximately 5.5 acres in size located at the upstream end of the project. WESTERN BRANCH: A channel 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide to a point 0.78 mile from the 40-foot channel, thence 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide for a distance of 0.38 mile; thence 18 feet deep and 150 feet wide for 0.57 mile to a point 0.34 mile above the West Norfolk Bridge. SCOTTS CREEK: A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide from the 40-foot channel for a distance of 0.73 mile. ANCHORAGE, SEWELLS POINT: Three fixed mooring anchorage facilities with a depth of 55 feet, each capable of accommodating two large vessels simultaneously; two anchorages opposite Sewells Point, 45 feet deep over a swing radius of 2,300 feet; anchorage area on the west side of the 55-foot channel opposite Lamberts Point aggregating 173 acres consisting of open space 1,500 feet square and 38 feet deep, one space 1,500 feet square and 35 feet deep, and one 5-6 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT space 3,000 feet long, 1,000 feet wide and 20 feet deep; and 45-acre anchorage, 12 feet deep, near Pinners Point. SOUTHERN BRANCH: The southern branch of the Elizabeth River generally oriented and flows south to north, and in the vicinity of this project is bordered on the east bank by the city of Chesapeake. The Southern Branch 40 Foot Deepening element will deepen a 2.5 mile section of the Elizabeth River from its current depth of 35 feet to 40 feet between the Norfolk and Western Railroad Bridge at mile 15, upstream to the U.S. Routes 460 and 13 highway bridge (also known as Gilmerton Bridge) at mile 17.5. This reach of the channel ranges in width between 250 and 500 feet, with an average width of 300 feet. The channel will be widened at selected points to permit vessels to safely negotiate bends. At mile 17.5, in the vicinity of the Gilmerton Bridge, an 800 foot turning basin with a depth of 40 feet will be constructed. In addition, the possible need for modifying the Gilmerton Bridge will be explored as part of this project. Operations during fiscal year. Planning, engineering and design were temporarily postponed due to questions of local sponsorship. Coordination continued with the local sponsor and other agencies regarding scheduling of additional deepening. Anchorages: Three fixed mooring anchorage facilities with a depth of 55 feet, each capable of accommodating two large vessels simultaneously; two anchorages opposite Sewells Point, 45 feet deep over a swing radius of 2,300 feet; anchorage area on the west side of the 55-foot channel opposite Lamberts Point aggregating 173 acres consisting of open space 1,500 feet square and 38 feet deep, one space 1,500 feet square and 35 feet deep, and one space 3,000 feet long, 1,000 feet wide and 20 feet deep; and a 45- acre anchorage, 12 feet deep, near Pinners Point. Operations during fiscal year. The District developed and negotiated the Project Cooperation Agreement on the proposed 50-foot anchorage improvement with the nonfederal sponsor, the Virginia Port Authority. Disposal area: A disposal area of about 2,500 acres adjacent to and north of Craney Island, enclosed by stonefaced levee of sand; re-handling basin, approach and exit channels connecting re-handling basin and Norfolk Harbor 55- foot channel and hopper dredge unloading facility. Operations during fiscal year. Tom Frieberg updating. September 1997 and completed in December 1997. A total of 161,172 cubic yards of material was removed from the re-handling basin. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for dredging the channel to an intermediate depth of 50 feet, which was completed December 15, 1988. The local sponsor (Virginia Port Authority) is required to furnish cost sharing in accordance with the provisions described in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended for additional deepening. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 11 (revised 1993) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by the Water Resources Support Center. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract to dredge the Norfolk Harbor 45-Ft. and 50-Ft. Channels was awarded in September 1997, and completed in April 1998; a total of 746,233 cubic yards was removed. A contract to dredge the Norfolk Harbor 40 Ft. Channel from Lambert Bend to Paradise Creek in the Southern Branch of the Elizabeth River was awarded in September 1997, and completed in December 1997; a total of 100,577 cubic yards was removed. A contract to dredge the 45-Ft. and 50-Ft. Channels was awarded in September 1998, with work continuing into FY 1999. In addition to maintenance dredging, work on the project included condition surveys and environmental studies. 16. OYSTER CHANNEL, VA Location. Oyster Channel is located in Northampton County, Virginia, at the town of Oyster, VA, and is a tributary of Liscombes Channel and Ramshorn Channel on the Virginia Eastern Shore. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12224). Existing Project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 80 feet wide from deep water in Liscombes Channel to and including a turning basin 6 feet deep and 1,100 feet long at Oyster, VA. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. The county of Northampton, VA, is the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. Existing terminal facilities are adequate for the present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded in September 1998, and the work was completed in October 1998; a total of 45,059 cubic yards was removed. 17. PARKER CREEK, VA Location. Parker Creek empties into the western side of Metompkin Bay in Accomack County, Virginia. It is on the ocean side of Virginialis Eastern Shore, about 20 miles south of the Maryland-Virginia state line. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12210.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 5 feet deep and 40 feet wide, from the junction with the Waterway on the Coast of Virginia in Metompkin Bay, extending into Parker Creek as far upstream as the 5-ft. contour. Mean range of tide is approximately 3.5 feet. 5-7 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1998 Local cooperation. Fully complied with. county of Accomack is the local sponsor of the project. The Terminal facilities. Existing terminal facilities, including a public dock located on the creek, are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded in September 1997, as a combined contract with the dredging of the Ramshorn Channel on the Waterway on the Coast of Virginia. Work on this contract continued into FY 1998, and was completed in February 1998, with a total of 21,649 cubic yards removed from Parker Creek. 18. RUDEE INLET, VA Location. On the Atlantic Coast of VA, within the city of Virginia Beach approximately 5 miles south of Cape Henry. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12205.) Existing Project. An entrance channel 10-ft deep, 10 to 72-ft wide and 1605-ft long; an inner channel 7-ft deep, 72 to 53-ft wide and 2,495-ft long including a safety area 7-ft deep, and approximately 1.9 acres in size and a turning basin 7-ft deep, 175-ft wide and 1,570-ft long; a sand trap 18-ft deep and approximately 3.3 acres in size; and a weir and jetty system at the mouth of the inlet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. The city of Virginia Beach as local sponsor is required to financially participate in continued annual maintenance as described in the Local Cooperation Agreement, and has fully participated through the current fiscal year. Terminal facilities. Existing terminal facilities, are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. A contract to dredge the entrance channel and sand trap was advertised for bids in February 1998, and bids opened during March 1998. The contract was completed in May 1998; a total of 31,636 cubic yards was removed. In addition, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Special Purpose Dredge CURRITUCK was utilized to dredge the entrance channel during October and December, 1997, and March 1998. 19. SUPERVISOR OF NORFOLK HARBOR (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIVE AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS) The District Engineer, Norfolk District, was designated Supervisor of the harbor of Hampton Roads under the provisions of the River and Harbor Act of June 29, 1888 (33 U.S.C. 441-451), as amended July 12,1952. Under this Act, the Supervisor of the harbor of Hampton Roads is charged with the mission of preventing the deposit of obstructive and injurious materials in the tidal waters of the harbors of Norfolk, Portsmouth, Newport News, Hampton Roads, and their adjacent and tributary waters, so much of the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries as lies within the state of Virginia, and so much of the Atlantic Ocean and its tributaries as lies within the jurisdiction of the United States within or to the east of the State of Virginia. The River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403,407,409), as amended, prohibits obstructions to navigable waters such as unauthorized structures, unauthorized fill, deposit of refuse, and sinking of vessels. Other laws relating to the supervision of Norfolk Harbor and its tributary waters are the Clean Water Act, The Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1969, the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, the Federal Power Act of 1920, the National Historic Prevention Act of 1966, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Deepwater Port Act of 1972, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, and the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act. Direct supervision of the waters under the jurisdiction of the Norfolk District was accomplished by means of two patrol vessels performing inspections, removing debris and investigating navigational hazards and sunken abandoned vessels. A derrick boat and crane barge performed removal of sunken vessels and navigational hazards and supported federal dredging projects. In addition, surveillance of the harbor was performed regarding the Corps' regulatory program, using also two small outboard craft, motor vehicles from land and occasional chartered aerial reconnaissance. This regulatory surveillance involved compliance surveys of permitted activities and evaluation of navigational impacts of proposed piers and other structures. 20. THIMBLE SHOAL CHANNEL, VA Location. In lower portion of Chesapeake Bay between Hampton Roads and the ocean, 20 miles northeast of center of Norfolk Harbor, extending southeasterly 12 miles from a point 1.25 miles east of Thimble Shoal lighthouse toward entrance to Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12222.) Existing project. Provides for dredging a channel 12 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 55 feet deep at mean low water. To date the 650-ft. wide outbound lane has been deepened and maintained to a depth of 50 feet, and the remaining 350-ft. width is maintained at a 45-ft. depth under the previous project. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation, due to combined wind and tides referred to mean low water, and minus 3 feet and plus 7 feet. 5-8 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For the most recent improvements to the channel (50-ft. depth over 650-ft. wide outbound lane), the Virginia Port Authority was project sponsor and shared in the cost of the improvement. Terminal facilities. Project serves as an entrance channel to Hampton Roads. See Port Series No. 11 (revised 1993) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by the Water Resources Support Center. Operations During Fiscal Year. Work during the fiscal year consisted of condition surveys of the channel and monitoring of the Dam Neck Ocean Dredged Material Management Site as required by the EPA. 21. WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VA Location. Between barrier beach along Atlantic Ocean on the east and Virginia portion of mainland peninsula on the west. It extends for 83.7 miles from south end of Chincoteague Bay through a number of creeks, thoroughfares and bays to enter Chesapeake Bay in the vicinity of Fisherman Island, just south of Cape Charles on the southern tip of the peninsula. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12210, 12211, and 12221.) Existing projects. An island waterway 6 feet at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Chesapeake Bay to Chincoteague Bay, VA. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet. Greater fluctuations in water level are caused by high winds and storms. A modification of the project approved during 170 under Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 authorized relocation of portions of the waterway and widening of 100 feet. Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. Operations during fiscal year. A dredging contract was awarded in July 1997, and completed in February 1998, for the realignment of the Waterway through the Ramshorn Channel, combined with Parker Creek. A total of 128,210 cubic yards was removed from the Ramshorn Channel. A dredging contract was awarded in May 1998, and completed in September 1998, for North, Sloop, and Burton's Bay Channels. From North Channel, 80,930 cubic yards were removed; from Sloop Channel 40,671 cubic yards were removed; and from Burton's Bay 81,745 cubic yards were removed, for a total of 203,346 cubic yards removed under the contract. Other work on the project consisted of condition surveys and environmental studies. 22. YORK RIVER, VA Location. This river is formed at West Point, VA, by the confluence of the Mattaponi and Pamnukey Rivers, and flows southeasterly about 41 miles into the Chesapeake Bay, which it enters about 20 miles in a northerly direction from Norfolk, VA, and 20 miles in a northwesterly direction from the Atlantic Ocean at Cape Henry. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12238 and 12243.) Existing project. This provides for dredging a channel 22 feet deep at mean low water and 400 feet wide through the bars, and a basin of the same depth at the wharves at West Point, and the construction of a dike on the right bank at West Point to assist in maintaining the channel. Also provides for dredging a channel 37 feet deep at mean lower low water and 750 feet wide from the 38 foot contour in the Chesapeake Bay to a point adjacent to the piers at the Yorktown Naval Weapons Station, approximately 8 miles above the mouth of the river. Mean range of tide is 2.2 feet at the mouth and 2.9 feet at West Point. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Virginia Port Authority was project sponsor and shared in the cost of the improvement to the Entrance Channel. Terminal facilities. The facilities are considered adequate for the existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Plans and specifications for the new work dredging of the entrance channel, to dimensions of 37 feet deep and 750 feet wide over its approximately 12 mile length were completed. A dredging contract was awarded to Great Lakes Dredge and Dock Company in June 1998; dredging was initiated in August and is scheduled to be completed during Fiscal Year 1999. See Annual Report for FY 1958 for the last complete report on the York River project. 23. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION The district continues work on six Section 107 (navigation) studies: York River Entrance Channel, VA, continuing the Plans and Specs (P&S) phase); Newport News Creek, VA, continuing the construction phase; Guilford Creek, VA, currently in construction phase with completion scheduled for April 1998; Jones Creek, VA, has completed construction and the project close-out activities have been scheduled; Back River, VA, currently in the feasibility phase; Cape Charles, VA, study is currently in the feasibility phase. BEACH EROSION CONTROL 24. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) 5-9 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1998 Location. The city of Virginia Beach is located on the southeastern coast of Virginia bordered by the Atlantic Ocean on the east, Chesapeake Bay on the north, the cities of Norfolk and Chesapeake on the west, and North Carolina on the south (See National Ocean Service Chart 12207.) Existing project. The plan of improvement includes construction of a vertical steel sheet-pile wall with concrete cap extending from Rudee Inlet to 58th Street, enhancement of the existing dune system between 58th Street and 89th Street, construction and periodic re-nourishment of a widened and raised beach berm between Rudee Inlet and 89th Street, a new boardwalk integrated with the vertical wall which will be placed seaward of the existing boardwalk extending from Rudee Inlet to approximately 40th Street, a storm water runoff system consisting of the offshore discharge by pumped flow through submarine pipelines, appropriate beach access structures consisting of ramps and stairs and dune crossover facilities. Local cooperation. The local sponsor (city of Virginia Beach) is required to furnish cost sharing in accordance with the provisions described in The Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Operations during fiscal year. Pre-construction engineering and design were in progress. The General Reevaluation Report, which incorporates the locally preferred plan, was approved in Jul 94. 25. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA, (REIMBURSEMENT) Location. The city of Virginia Beach is located on the southeastern coast of Virginia bordered by the Atlantic Ocean on the east, Chesapeake Bay on the north, the cities of Norfolk and Chesapeake on the west, and North Carolina on the south. (See National Ocean Service Chart 12207.) Existing project. The periodic nourishment program is a modification of the original project adopted by the 1954 River and Harbor Act, which provided for beach restoration and the deferred construction of a system of drains. Comparative cost studies of groin construction versus periodic nourishment indicate that the later is the more suitable and economical method for maintaining share stability, protecting property, and insuring maximum recreation benefits from use of the publicly-owned shores. The current project includes periodic nourishment of approximately 3.3 miles of beach between Rudee Inlet and 49th Street with maintenance of the berm to a minimum width of approximately 100 feet of elevation 7 feet above mean low water. Local cooperation. The non-federal sponsor is the city of Virginia Beach. The original Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) expired 6 February 1987. Consistent with Section 934 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, a new PCA was required. Ten additional years of federal participation in periodic nourishment cost sharing were approved on 10 March 1988 by the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works. A PCA for the extension of periodic nourishment was executed on 9 August 1993. Article VII of the 9 August 1993 PCA states 'The Government shall not be obligated to budget for appropriations to reimburse the Local Sponsor for, and costs incurred by the Local Sponsor for periodic nourishment after February 6, 1987, and before execution of this agreement. The government shall reimburse the local sponsor for such costs only when specifically directed by Congress in legislation and when appropriations are made available for such purpose." Operations during fiscal year. The federal shares (65%) of the 1994 re-nourishment cost was reimbursed to the city of Virginia Beach. Total cost was $759,402. 26. JAMES R. OLIN FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, VA. Location. The city of Buena Vista is on the left bank of the Maury River, 40 miles below the rivers origin and about 11 miles upstream of its juncture with the main stem of the James River at the community of Glasgow. The Maury River Basin above Buena Vista contains a drainage area of about 840 square miles. Existing projects. The project will provide a system of floodwalls and levees on the left bank and channel modifications to provide flood protection against a flood equal to the August 1969, event which is the maximum flood of recent record. The programmed portion of the project (lower element) consists of a combination levee/floodwall with controlled channelized flow of interior drainage and channel refinement to the Maury River. The unprogrammed portion of the project (upper element) consists of a concrete ringwall around the Georgia Bonded Fibers plant. Local cooperation. The local sponsor (city of Buena Vista) is required to furnish cost sharing in accordance with the provisions described in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended, for project construction, and maintain and operate all works after completion. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) for the programmed portion of the project was executed on February 17, 1994. Operations during fiscal year. The programmed lower element was constructed in two phases; Phase I consists of channel refinements to the Maury River; Phase 11 5-10 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT consists of the levee, floodwall, closures and interior drainage canal. Construction for Phase I and Phase II is 100 percent complete. 27. GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA Location. Gathright Dam is on the Jackson River, a tributary of James River at mile 43.4 in Allegheny County. Gathright Dam site is in the reach of the Jackson River known as the Gorge, about 19 miles upstream from Covington, VA. At the elevation of the top of the conservation pool, the lake extends upstream about 9 miles. (See Falling Spring and Mountain Grove, Virginia-West Virginia quadrangles of geological survey.) Existing project. Gathright Dam consists of a 1,172-foot long, rolled-rock-fill dam with an impervious core, with the top at elevation 1,684.5; outlet works consisting of a concrete intake structure located in the right bank 500 feet upstream from the axis of the dam: a 1,075-foot long outlet tunnel through the right abutment and a stilling basin; and a 2,450-foot long fixed-crest emergency spillway excavated in a low saddle in the divide at Fortney Branch about 2.5 miles south of the dam. Discharges through the maximum conservation poot elevation 1,582 will be provided for water quality control. The reservoir area at elevation 1,582 will be 2,530 acres. A total of 302,000 acre-feet of storage between elevation 1,582 and the spillway crest (elevation 1,663.5) will be reserved for flood control. At the spillway crest the reservoir will have an area of 4,540 acres. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Care of service and recreational facilities, water control management, testing and monitoring, supervision and administration and engineering and design. A contract to paint Intake Tower Access Bridge was awarded in January 1996 and substantially completed in October 1996. 28. RICHMOND FILTRATION PLANT, VA Location: The Richmond Water Filtration Plant is located in the city of Richmond, VA, bordered on the north by Henrico County and on the south by Chesterfield County. Existing project: As a result of Tropical Storm Agnes in June 1972, the water filtration plant was flooded and the estimated 400,000 population served was without potable water supply for over five days and without fire protection for over three days. The project will provide flood protection of the municipal water supply treatment plant from a flood having a recurrence of 360 years. The project will provide flood protection by enclosing three sides of the water filtration plant with a floodwall and tying into high ground. The wall will have an average height of about nine feet with a top elevation of 117 feet MSL. The project will be built through one contract over two years. Local cooperation: The city of Richmond, VA is the local sponsor; a Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on October 21, 1994. Operation during the fiscal year: In FY 97, Congress added $3,500,000 for construction of the project. The Administration does not support funding for the project because the lack of flood protection at the filtration plant is considered a design deficiency and should be undertaken by local interests. A construction contract was awarded on July 31, 1995, and is 98 percent complete. 29. EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES During FY 98, $99,815 was spent on Flood Control Coastal Emergencies. 30. GENERAL INVESTIGATION SURVEYS Total cost of surveys during the fiscal year amounted to $726,119. The work consisted of a shoreline protection study of Poquoson $282,946; special studies $326,624, to include King George and Caroline Counties, and comprehensive Watershed Studies of the Elizabeth River Basin and Nansemond River Basin; special investigations $29,145; Interagency Water Resources Development $25,708; National Marine Fisheries Service $1,428; coordination with other agencies and cooperation with states $41,725; and review of the AIWW Bridge Replacement at Great Bridge, VA $18,543. 31. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the fiscal year, cost of collection and study of basic data was $201,635 consisting of flood plain management studies including Quick Responses, Management Service Unit, Technical Services and Environmental Data Studies and special studies. 5-11 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1998 TABLE 5-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Section Project Total Cost In Text Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 to 30 Sep 98 1. Appomattox River, VA (Regular Funds) 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, VA and the St. John's River, FL (Norfolk District) (Regular Funds) 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, Great Bridge 4. Back River, Poquoson, VA 5. Bennetts Creek, VA 6. Channel to Newport News, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 7. Chincoteague Inlet, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 8. Guilford Creek, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Major Rehab Approp Cost Recreation Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 254,240 253,492 42,627 54,807 - 1,645,024 - 1,642,085 3,439,227 1,465,663 3,423,908 1,469,683 5,898 5,503 37,801 37,801 870,341 870,341 956,667 968,452 - - 1,645,024 - - 1,642,085 2,104,601 2,323,087 11,689,969 2,216,598 2,325,557 11,789,339 - - - 479,947 - - - 479,947 - - - 59,871 - - - 59,871 - 307,000 1,433,000 2,479,708 - 320,343 279,736 1,316,085 126,300 42,526 Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 40,311 40,311 32,255 32,255 - 84,526 - 84,526 126,300 42,526 84,526 84,526 - - 4,097,117 - - 4,097,117 41,000 1,147,500 1,596,160 41,000 1,147,500 1,596,160 - - 4,918,544 - - 4,695,108 227,000 227,000 958,169 589,466 658,169 589,446 813,356 810,908 - 997,400 - 945,322 - 191,200 - 76,426 860,437 4,790,639 860,437 4,789,581 - 3,850 - 3,850 - 997,400 - 945,322 - 191,200 - 76,426 5-12 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT Table 5-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Section Project Total Cost In Text Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 to 30 Sep 98 9. Hampton Roads, VA (Collection and Removal of Drift) 10. James River, VA 11. Jones Creek, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 12. Lynnhaven Inlet, Virginia Beach, VA 13. Nandua Creek, VA 14. Newport News Creek, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 15. Norfolk Harbor and Channels (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 610,000 672,625 604,751 676,154 1,884,077 3,945,524 1,878,870 3,945,255 890,691 664,083 4,067,399 884,276 661,313 4,067,059 - - 7,639,904 - - 7,639,904 3,186,802 5,327,980 18,379,501 3,171,910 5,333,570 17,965,077 -- 241,665 - 176,104 - 57,900 - 18,429 53,036 1,236 21,253 21,514 294,701 177,340 79,153 39,943 -- - 445,354 - - - 445,354 - 824,832 211,224 5,392,426 - 783,503 244,749 1,370,457 Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost - 353,994 - 320,682 - 80,000 - 26,172 1100,000 625,800 6,027,725 6,064,496 425,000 632,230 1,829,748 1,829,748 1,192,000 619,354 4,723,876 4,683,354 139,152 139,058 386,310 346,172 226,124 23,553 139,152 139,058 740,304 666,854 306,124 49,725 296,000 8,866,632 494,079 9,212,248 4,788,762 119,603,964 4,846,674 119,619,843 - 1,805,451 - 1,762,697 16. Oyster Channel, VA 17. Parker Creek, VA 18. Rudee Inlet, VA (Regular Funds) Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost - 120,762 - 120,762 - 123,106 - 116,106 446,169 446,170 420,557 415,735 132,724 132,757 148,021 145,018 19,337 19,337 - 836,813 - 836,813 518,461 2,262,284 518,461 2,154,458 5-13 120,762 120,762 142,443 135,443 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1998 TABLE 5-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Section Project Total Cost In Text Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 to 30 Sep 98 18. Rudee Inlet (continued) (Contributed Funds) 19. Supervisor of the Harbor of Hampton Roads, VA (Prevention of Obstructive and Injurious Deposits) 20. Thimble Shoal Channel, VA 21. Waterway on the Coast of VA (Regular Funds) 22. York River, VA 23. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization 24. Virginia Beach, VA (Hurricane Protection) (Contributed Funds) 25. Virginia Beach, VA (Reimbursement) 26. James R. Olin Flood Control Project, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 27. Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, VA (Regular Funds) 28. Richmond Filtration Plant Flood Protection Richmond, VA (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 250,000 270,570 270,000 672,625 270,570 676,154 177,192 179,977 380,112 1,371,175 379,207 1,371,586 - 216,498 - 128,421 - 268,895 - 241,596 785,895 782,626 327,998 280,219 2,084,536 328,449 280,092 2,088,222 - 166,331 13,701,298 - 166,613 13,701,580 - - 177,192 - - 179,977 1,512,306 1,478,369 - 850,498 - 850,498 985,242 6,606,059 1,017,372 6,244,282 80,000 2,871,826 3,168,324 68,651 2,387,637 2.584.709 163,009 450,254 1,505,208 1,113,065 1,451,624 1,079,063 433,000 948,670 653,823 948,569 1,656,000 9,338,492 6,335,000 4,034,559 9,317,821 5,132,000 - - 975,000 - - 482,000 - 80,970,511 - 80,970,511 1,261,256 1,261,256 1,165,324 1,165,324 2,000,000 1,259,178 2,240,817 2,424,152 500,000 1,500,000 - 999,999 8,000,000 7,591,146 8,500,000 8,223,000 13,000,000 7,404,358 6,700,000 945,213 26,458,265 19,386,912 15,400,000 9,201,097 461,000 1,358,000 3,932,670 37,685 874,836 3,028,508 - 21,129,492 406,173 19,978,804 - 3,975,000 - 3,022,972 - - 80,970,511 - - 80,970,511 1,269,280 1,443,618 6,521,810 1,274,992 1,466,427 6,361,127 3,510,000 - 8,719,178 2,975,000 808,385 9,264,715 - 1,999,000 4,010,000 - 2,778,394 3,789,393 5-14 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT Table 5-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Section Project Total Cost In Text Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 to 30 Sep 98 29. Emergency Flood Control Activities 30. Special Investigation Surveys 31. Collection and Study of Basic Data Cost Cost Cost 439,929 205,110 690,359 198,437 786,773 131,143 90,000 726,119 201,635 99,815 1,316,006 854,718 177,085 3,995,705 1,092,652 5-15 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1998 TABLE 5-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents APPOMATTOX RIVER, VA (See Section 1 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep at mean high water and 60 feet wide. Diversion channel and work incidental thereto. Increasing channel to width of 80 feet and maintenance of diversion works. Channel 80 feet wide and 10 feet deep at mean low water Existing project dimensions ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA, AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (NORFOLK DISTRICT) (See Section 2 of Text) Existing project dimensions and original route, waterway from Norfolk, VA, to sounds of North Carolina Original route to Norfolk-Beaufort Inlet section Purchase of Albemarle& Chesapeake Co. Canal Purchase of Lake Drummond Canal (Dismal Swamp Canal) Construct a tidal lock at Great Bridge at a cost not to exceed $500,000 Operating and care of works of improvement provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Construct dikes for protection of canal property against Flood tides Nov 28, 1995 ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BRIDGE AT GREAT BRIDGE, VA (See Section 3 of Text) Replace existing 2-lane VA route 168 AIWW highway Bridge at Great Bridge with a 5-lane bascule bridge and Approach roadways. The city of Chesapeake, VA, shall Assume full ownership of the replacement bridge to be Constructed under the project, including all associated Operation, maintenance, repair, replacement, and Rehabilitation costs. CHANNEL TO NEWPORT NEWS, VA (See Section 6 of Text) Channel 35 feet deep, 400 feet wide Channel 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide Channel 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide Channel 40 feet deep, 800 feet wide, two deep draft anchorage Deepen existing 45 foot channel to 55 feet CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA (See Section 7 of Text) Existing Project HAMPTON ROADS AND HARBORS OF NORFOLK AND NEWPORT NEWS, VA, COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT (See Section 15 of Text) Collection and removal of floating debris in Hampton Roads and It's tributary waters Removal of Trigg cofferdam Turning basin at Richmond Harbor Maintaining turning basin at Richmond Deepwater Terminal Channel depth increased to 35 feet to Richmond Deepwater Terminal LYNNHAVEN INLET, VA (See Section 12 of Text) Existing Project Long Creek, Lynnhaven Inlet modification Annual Report 1874, pt. 11 p.54 H. Doc. 139, 56 Cong. 2" sess and Annual Report 1901, P 1467 H. Doc 952, 60th Cong. 1" sess H. Doc 215, 69th Cong. 1"t sess H. Doc 223, 76 th Cong. 1" sess H. Doc 317, 54"' Cong 1" sess AR 1896 H. Doc 391, 62nd Cong, 2"d sess H. Doc 589, 62"nd Cong, 2" sess Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc. 67"h Cong, 2 nd sess S. Doc 23, 61" Cong, 1" sess Not Available H. Doc 117, 76 th Cong, 1" sess H. Doc 440, 104'" Cong (Sec 339h). National Highway System Designation Act of 1995 - Public Law (104-59) H. Doc 550, 61" Cong, 2 " nd sess H. Doc 486, 67"' Cong, 4" sess H. Doc 143, 8 9 th Cong, 2"d sess Approved in 1972 Rivers & Harbors Comm, Doc 68, 7 4 ' h Cong, 1s' sess H. Doc 738, 77"h Cong, 1" sess H. Doc 191, 81"s Cong, 1st sess H. Doc 586, 87"h Cong, 2 nd sess H. Doc 580, 87"h Cong, 2 " nd sess Approved in 1982 5-16 Mar. 3, 1871 Jun 13, 1902 Mar 3, 1909 Jun 25, 1910 Jan 21, 1927 Mar 2, 1945 Mar 3, 1899 Jul 25, 1912 Mar 3, 1925 Jul 3, 1930 Jun 26, 1934 Mar 2, 1945 Jun 25, 1910 Aug 8, 1917 Jan 21, 1927 Oct 27, 1965 Oct 17, 1986 Jul 14, 1960 May 17, 1950 Aug 26, 1937 Mar 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Oct 23, 1962 Oct 23, 1962 Jul 14, 1960 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents NORFOLK HARBOR AND CHANNELS, VA (See Section 15 of Text) HAMPTON ROADS AND ELIZABETH RIVER Channel 30 feet deep to navy shipyard Depth of 35 feet to navy shipyard Depth of 40 feet and width of 750 feet to mouth of Southern Branch Widen 40 foot channel to 1,500 feet from 40 foot contour in Hampton Roads to a point just south of Norfolk International Terminal 45 feet deep Ft. Wool to Lambert Point, 800 feet wide Deepen existing 45 foot channel to 55 feet SOUTHERN BRANCH Channel with a depth of 22 to 25 feet Depth of 40 feet and width of 450 feet from mouth of Belt Line RR bridge Channel 30 feet deep and 375 feet wide to Virginia RR bridge, thence 25 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide to Norfolk & Western RR bridge SCOTTS CREEK Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide to a point 100 feet above the Atlantic Coast RR bridge ANCHORAGES 30 foot anchorage at Lambert Point 12 foot anchorage at Pinner Point An anchorage 38 feet deep and 1,500 feet square: anchorage 35 feet deep and 1,500 feet square; and an anchorage 20 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 3,000 feet long Two anchorages opposite Sewells Point 45 feet deep with 1,200 foot swinging radius Construct a 55 foot anchorage and increase the radius to 1,500 feet for an existing 45 foot anchorage H. Doc, 381, 59"th Cong, 1" sess H. Doc 551, 61st Cong, 2 " d sess H. Doc 140, 65t"h Cong, 15"s ess Doc 122, 83rd Cong, 2 " d sess H. Doc 187, 89th Cong, I sr sess H. Doc 101 3, 99" Cong, 2 "d sess H. Doc, 551, 61"s Cong, 2nd sess H. Doc 140, 65 th Cong, 1"Sse ss H. Doc 226, 68th Cong, 1" sess H. Doc 189, 70th Cong, 1" sess H. Doc 551, 61" Cong, 2 "d sess H. Doc 605, 63 rd Cong, 2nd sess H. Doc 122, 83rd Cong, 2nd sess H. Doc. 397, 60th Cong, 1" sess H. Doc. 1013, 99 h Cong, 2"d sess Mar 2, 1907 Jun 25, 1910 Aug 8, 1917 Sep 3, 1954 Oct 27, 1965 Oct 17, 1986 Jun 25, 1910 Aug 8, 1917 Mar 30, 1925 Jul 3, 1930 Jun 25, 1910 Aug 8, 1917 Sep 3, 1954 Oct 27, 1965 Oct 17, 1986 Jul 14, 1960 Aug 8, 1917 Sep 3, 1954 Oct 27, 1965 Jun 25, 1910 Mar 2, 1945 Sep 3, 1954 Oct 23, 1962 Mar 7, 1974 Oct 17, 1986 Nov 28, 1990 Oct 5, 1992 Oct 12, 1996 THIMBLE SHOAL CHANNEL, VA (See Section 20 of Text) A channel 40 feet deep and 750 feet wide Channel width increased to 1,000 feet with side channel on either side 32 feet deep and 450 feet wide Channel 45 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA (See Section 21 of Text) Existing project adopted Project modified VIRGINIA BEACH, VA, HURRICANE PROTECTION (See Section 24 of Text) Project authorized Project modified Project modification authorized for Phase I Advanced Engineering and Design Project modified Participation after Feb 6, 1987 Cost Sharing Adjustment of non-federal cost H. Doc. 140, 65"h Cong, 1" sess S. Doc 122, 83rd Cong, 2"d sess H. Doc. 187, 89"h Cong, 1"sSe ss H. Doc 957, 60 h Cong, 1" sess H. Doc 268, 76" Cong, 1Ss"e ss H. Doc 186, 83rd Cong, 1' sess H. Doc 382, 87th Cong, 2 " d sess H. Doc 365, 92 " d Cong, 2 "d sess H. Doc 216, 89"h Cong, 2"d sess S. Doc 640, 104 'h Cong 5-17 RUDEE INLET, VA (See Section 18 of Text) Project authorized (Sec 107) Existing project approved in 1986 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1998 TABLE 5-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents VIRGINIA BEACH, VA, REIMBURSEMENT (See Section 25 of Text) Project Authorized Extension of federal participation JAMES R. OLIN FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, VA (Formerly BUENA VISTA, VA) (See Section 26 of Text) Project authorized Name of project changed GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA (See Section 27 of Text) Project authorized S. Doc. 640, 104 t" Cong Chief of Engrs Report dated Jul 27, 1990 H. Doc. 325, 61" Cong, 2 "d sess 5-18 Oct 12, 1996 Nov 28, 1990 Oct 5, 1992 Jul 24, 1946 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1998 Additional Expenditure Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From Project For: Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds Aberdeen Creek, VA 2/ 1975 109,643 221,827 Appomattox River, VA 1/ 1992 870,341 4,794,436 Atlantic Ocean Channel, VA 1991 608,255 Bennett Creek, VA 1992 442,602 - 104,621 Bckwater River, VA Active portion 2/10/ 1975 342,118 185,577 19,300 Broad Creek, VA 2/ 1986 27,888 697,108 500 Cape Charles, VA 1989 622,644 2,511,748 Carters Creek, VA Active portion 2/ 3/ 1951 28,398 29,127 Channel to Newport News, VA 1992 4,097,117 7,145,456 4,965,108 Channel from Phoebus, VA to deepwater in Hampton Roads 2/ 1944 11,500 64,919 1,200 Channel connecting York River, VA Back Creek to Sleights Wharf 2/ 1950 14,855 38,634 2,500 Chesconessex Creek, VA 2/ 1968 25,516 43,775 Chincoteague Bay, VA 1984 25,126 513,005 Chincoteague Harbor of Refuge, VA 1985 49,396 242,237 Chowan River, NC 2/ 1975 107,220 14,416 5,700 Cockrelis Creek, VA 4/ 1949 Cranes Creek, VA 1992 6,274 685,124 Davis Creek, VA 2/ 1971 97,612 213,105 4,000 Deep Creek, Accomack Co., VA 1974 83,000 197,259 Deep Creek, Newport News, VA 21 1991 288,278 3,318,501 Dymers Creek, VA 2/ 1953 5,582 7,658 Finney Creek at Wachapreague, VA 1988 68,656 6,278 7,763 Greenvale Creek, VA 2/ 1991 20,003 775,614 Hampton Creek, \/A 1989 186,237 1,270,204 62,969 Hom Harbor, VA 2/ 1990 13,987 351,590 Hoskins Creek, VA 2/ 1990 44,100 1,881,736 500 Jackson Creek, VA 2/ 1971 8,500 50,844 Jarvis Creek, VA 4/ 1979 39,259 Kings Creek, VA 4/ 1957 5,593 Lafayette River, VA 2/ 1982 242,047 371,384 188,962 Little Machiponoo River, VA 1990 0 0 1,211 Little River (Creek), VA 2/ 12/ 1966 168,623 566,521 Locklies Creek, VA 2/ 1928 11,581 68,506 Lynnhaven Inlet, VA 1991 459,612 3,018,333 Mattaponi River, VA 1971 83,836 215,927 Meherrin River, VA 1987 47,734 54,764 Miliford Haven, VA 2/ 1950 24,568 33,688 Mill Creek, VA 2/ 1937 5,445 21,536 Mulberry Creek, 2/ 1950 2,393 2,458 Nandua Creek 2/ 1950 6,988 138,700 Nansemond River, VA 6/ 1978 167,477 508,401 Newport News Creek, VA 2/ 1992 261,697 449,516 Noftoway River, VA 2/ 1986 44,295 8,734 43,000 Occohannock Creek, VA Active portion 2/ 1951 13,859 92,044 Onancock River, VA 2/ 5/ 1963 187,914 525,952 Oyster Channel, VA 2/ 1991 119,117 788,122 Pagan River, VA 2/ 6/ 1950 51,425 825,104 Pamunkey River, VA Active portion 2/ 1964 31,376 161,183 Parker Creek, VA 1991 15,530 583,325 Parrotts Creek, VA 2/ 1957 37,045 69,132 Portsmouth Harbor, VA Channel to Nansemond Ordnance Depot 2/ 1947 165,566 66,162 Oueens Creek 2/ 1991 26,949 442,606 Quinby Creek, VA 1991 104,176 1,788,503 5-19 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1998 TABLE 5-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1998 Additional Expenditure Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From Project For: Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds Rappahannock River, VA 8/ 9/ 11/ 1983 414,633 1,969,242 Rappahannock River at Bowlers Wharf, VA 4/ 1950 Starlings Creek, VA 1991 66,242 1,143,236 Tangier Channels, VA 1992 146,138 3,506,001 Taskinas Creek, VA 1975 7,479 135 Thimble Shoal Channel, VA 13/ 1991 17,934,772 14,967,074 3,459,868 Totuskey Creek, VA 1970 167,869 451,293 2,000 Tylers Beach Harbor, VA 2/ 1982 311,201 804,713 Urbanna Creek, VA 2/ 7/ 1963 55,724 116,433 Whitings Creek, VA 1990 21,630 431,506 500 Winter Harbor 2/ 1981 171,334 340,837 2,973 Willoughby Channel, VA 2/ 1953 8,500 128,188 Wishart Point Channel, VA 2/ 1975 118,762 151,892 30,625 York River, VA Active portion 1986 265,694 361,616 1/ Includes $22,500 for previous projects. 2/ Completed. 3/ Inaddition, $700 for maintenance was expended from contributed funds. 4/ Inactive. 5/ Includes $33,549 for new work and $24,754 for maintenance for previous projects. 6/ Includes $20,671 for new work for previous projects. 7/ In addition, $61,087 was expended for rehabilitation. 8/ In addition, $168,091 was expended for rehabilitation. 9/ Includes $197,146 for previous new work projects. 10/ Includes $15,000 for new work for previous projects. 11/ Includes $113,500 for previous maintenance projects. 12/ Federal funds expended by the U.S. Navy for new work. 13/ In addition, $143,00o for maintenance was expended from contributed funds. 5-20 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5- D OTHER AUTHORIZED SHORE PROTECTION PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1998 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From For: Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds Anderson Park, Newport News, VA 1979 471,474 1,254 176,671 Hampton Institute, VA 1976 156,906 1,589 175,845 Rapidan River, Orange, VA 1984 45,000 - Saxis Island, VA 1987 273,600 - 3,145 Tangier Island Shore Protection, VA 1990 2,481,815 2,008 1,379,371 TABLE 5-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30,1998 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From For: Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds Newmarket Creek, VA Norfolk Floodwall, VA Scottsville, VA Virginia Beach Canal No. 2. VA 1970 1973 1989 1990 1,000,000 1,851,933 3,431,746 4,708,587 47,562 51,827 19,010 54,380 550,097 516,256 32,954 216,596 5-21 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1998 TABLE 5-H RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS PROJECT NAME MONTH/YEAR TYPE OF SURVEY Aberdeen Creek Atlantic Ocean Channel Atlantic Intercoastal Waterway: Dismal Swamp Canal Baltimore Harbor and Channels: Rappahannock Shoal Channel Blackwater River: Cherry Grove Cut-off Georges Bend Cut-off Bennetts Creek Broad Creek Carters Creek Channel to Newport News Chincoteague Inlet: Ocean Bar Channel Chowan River: Riddicksville Cut-off Cranes Creek Hoskins Creek Jackson Creek James River: Dancing Point to Swann Point Goose Hill Channel Jordan Point to Windmill Point Richmond Deepwater Terminal Richmond Deepwater Terminal To Hopewell Richmond Deepwater Terminal To Hopewell Richmond Harbor Rocklanding Shoal Channel May 98 Oct 97 Mar 98 Condition Reconnaissance Condition May-Jul 98 Sep 98 Sep 98 Aug 98 May 98 Jun 98 Apr-May 98 Apr 98 Sep 98 Aug 98 May 98 Sep 98 Jun 98 May 98 Jan 98 May 98 Jan-Feb 98 May-Jun 98 Feb 98 Jun 98 Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition and Reconnaissance Condition Condition Reconnaissance Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition 5-22 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-H (Continued). RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS PROJECT NAME MONTH/YEAR TYPE OF SURVEY James River (continued) Tribell Shoal Tribell Shoal Jones Creek Lafayette River: Entrance Channel East Haven Knitting Mill Creek Little Creek Lynnhaven Inlet Nansemond River: Vicinity Kings Highway Bridge Norfolk Harbor: Craney Island Rehandling Basin Eastern Branch Entrance Branch Norfolk Harbor Channel Southern Branch Western Branch Occohannock Creek Pagan River Parrotts Creek Queens Creek Quinby Creek Rappahannock River: Fredericksburg Bar Mangoright Bar Starlings Creek Thimble Shoal Channel Feb 98 Jun 98 Mar 98 Condition Reconnaissance Condition Apr 98 Apr 98 Apr 98 Mar-Apr 98 Apr 98 May 98 Jul 98 Jan 98 Oct 97 Oct 97 Jan-Mar 98 Jan 98 Sep 98 Mar 98 Jun 98 Jun 98 Jun 98 Sep 98 May 98 Apr 98 Oct 97 Oct 97-Jan 98 Reconnaissance Condition Condition Condition Reconnaissance Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Reconnaissance Condition Condition Reconnaissance Condition 5-23 Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1998 TABLE 5-H (Continued) RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS PROJECT NAME MONTH/YEAR TYPE OF SURVEY Waterway on the Coast of Virginia: Cedar Island Bay Gargathy Inlet Channel Metompkin Bay Channel Teagles Ditch Whitings Creek Winter Harbor York River to Back Creek Jul 98 Mar 98 Jun 98 Jul 98 Oct 97 Apr 98 Sep 98 Condition Condition Reconnaissance Condition Condition Condition Condition 5-24 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT * This district comprises central and eastern North Carolina and a portion of south-central Virginia, embraced in drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean from the southern boundary of Virginia to the Shallotte River, inclusive, with exception of the Meherrin River Basin above Murfreesboro, N. C., the Chowan River Basin above the confluence of the Nottaway and Blackwater Rivers, and the Pasquotank River and its tributaries for navigation only. Also included are those portions of the Yadkin-Pee-Dee and Catawba River basins within the state of N. C. as well as a portion of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway from the northern boundary of North Carolina to Little River, S. C., and a portion of the waterway from Norfolk, Va., to the Sounds of North Carolina, south of the north shore of Albemarle Sound. IMPROVEMENTS Page Navigation 1. Aquatic Plant Control ................................ ... 6-2 (R & H Act of 1965) 2. Atlantic Beach Channels, N.C ..................... 6-2 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, Va. and St. Johns River, Fla, (Wilmington District) .................. 6-2 4. Avon Harbor, N.C ....................................... 6-4 5. Beaufort Harbor, N.C........................................ 6-4 6. Belhaven Harbor, N.C....................................... 6-4 7. Cape Fear River, N.C. Above Wilmington ........ 6-5 8. Channel from Pamlico Sound to Rodanthe, N.C. ..................................... 6-5 9. Drum Inlet, N.C. .............................................. 6-5 10. Far Creek, N.C........................................... 6-6 11. Lockwoods Folly River, N.C ........................... 6-6 12. Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N.C ...................... 6-6 13. Morehead City Harbor, N.C ........................... 6-7 14. Neuse River, N.C ......................... .... 6-8 15. Ocracoke Inlet, N.C ............. ................... .. 6-8 16. Pamlico and Tar Rivers, N.C ......................... 6-8 17. Roanoke River, N.C ................ .................. 6-9 18. Rollinson Channel, N.C .................................... 6-9 19. Shallotte River, N.C ....................................... 6-9 20. Silver Lake Harbor, N.C ................................ 6-9 21. Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, N.C ............................ 6-10 22. Wilmington Harbor, N.C ............................. 6-10 Flood Control 23. Cape Fear River Basin, N.C ......................... 6-12 23-A. B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, N.C........... 6-12 24. Carolina Beach and Vicinity, N.C ................ 6-12 25. Clinton Wastewater Treatment Plant, Clinton, N.C. ................................................. 6-13 26. Danville (Southside Wastewater Treatment Plant), Va ................................ 6-13 27. Hamlet City Lake, N.C ................................ 6-14 28. King (Water Plant), N.C . .................. 6-14 29. Moravian Creek, Wilkesboro, N.C ............... 6-15 30. N.C. Aquarium, Dare County, N.C ............... 6-15 31. Neuse River Basin, N.C ................................. 6-15 31-A. Falls Lake, N.C. ........................................ 6-15 32. Roanoke River Upper Basin, Va.-Headwaters Area .................................. . 6-16 33. Wrightsville Beach, N.C. ............................... 6-16 34. Yadkin River Basin, N.C. and S.C ............... 6-17 Page 34-A. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, N.C. ............................... ........ 6-17 35. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............................... ... 6-17 36. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .................................. . 6-17 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 37. Roanoke River Basin, Va. and N.C ................ 6-18 37-A. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, Va. and N.C ................................................. 6-18 37-B. Philpott Lake, Va. ..................................... 6-18 38. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ..................................... 6-18 Miscellaneous 39. Project Modifications For Improvement of Environment-Cape Fear Lock & Dam No.1 Fish Ladder, N.C.................... 6-20 General Investigations 40. Surveys ..................................... 6-21 41. Collection and Study of Basic Data ................. 6-21 42. Preconstruction Engineering and Design .............................. ............... 6-21 Tables Table 6-A Cost and Financial Statement ............ 6-22 Table 6-B Authorizing Legislation ................... 6-28 Table 6-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........................... 6-31 Table 6-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ............................. ... 6-32 Table 6-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................................... 6-33 Table 6-F Not Applicable Table 6-G Deauthorized Projects ...................... 6-34 Table 6-H Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ............................ 6-35 Table 6-I Navigation Work Under Special Authorization....................... 6-35 Table 6-J Dams and Reservoirs ....................... 6-36 Table 6-K Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ....................... 6-37 6-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (RIVER AND HARBOR ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Wilmington District. Existing project. The existing project provides for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with the report of the Chief of Engineers, House Document 251,89th Congress, 1st session. The project was authorized by Section 302, 1965 River and Harbor Act (H.D. 25, 89th Congr., 1st sess.). The Act provides that research and planning costs shall be borne fully by the United States. Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project, and participate to the extent of 50 percent of the cost of the program. Recon studies are 100 percent Federal. Requirements are being met. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: New work: Operations for FY 98 included chemical control (rodeo herbicide) on 23 acres of alligator weed, with funds carried over from prior years. All treatment sites are under maintenance control. No new areas were added to the program in FY 98. Adjustment in accrued cost for prior year Aquatic Plant Control Program activities resulted in a decrease of $1,008. Condition at end of fiscal year. All alligatorweed treatment sites were under maintenance control in FY 98. Monitoring ofhydrilla control sites previously stocked with triploid grass carp indicates that overall our biological control efforts have been effective. Monitoring indicates that 4 sites no longer contain hydrilla. 2. ATLANTIC BEACH CHANNELS, N.C. Location. In Carteret County, on south side of Bogue Sound, 3 miles west of Beaufort Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Existing project. A channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway in Bogue Sound to the marina east of Money Island; and a channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from the intersection of Money Island and Causeway Channel in Bogue Sound to the southern end of Causeway Channel. The length of channels is 28 miles. Existing project was authorized November 23, 1965, under authority of Section 107, 1960. River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance, and aids to navigation, including suitable spoil-disposal areas, and necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor or the cost of such works; hold the United States free from damages; provide and maintain adequate public terminal and transfer facilities open to all equally in both Money Island Channel and Causeway Channel; provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local channels commensurate with the depths provided in the related project areas; and provide a cash contribution toward the first costs of the project, expressed as a percentage of the Federal construction costs, of 50 percent for Money Island Channel, and 41.5 percent for Causeway Channel. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Numerous wharves and piers exist along Causeway Channel, and a marina near Money Island has berthing facilities for about 100 boats. Existing facilities are not adequate, and additional facilities will be provided by local interests. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: No work was performed in FY 98 and remaining funds were reprogrammed from the project. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed April 1996. 3. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL. (WILMINGTON DISTRICT) Location. The project is located on the east coast of the United States, between Norfolk, Va., and St. Johns River, Florida. The section within Wilmington District begins at the Virginia-North Carolina State line and extends generally southerly and southwestwardly to Little River, S. C., a total of 308 statute miles. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 830 to 842, inclusive.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1926, 1932, and 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a waterway, 12 feet deep, with widths varying from 90 feet in land cuts to 300 feet in open waters; the construction, operation and maintenance of suitable bridges; saltwater intrusion preventive measures in the vicinity of Fairfield, N. C.; a channel in Peltier Creek, 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from the Intracoastal Waterway in Bogue Sound to and including a basin in Peltier Creek, 6 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and 600 feet long; a channel, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide between the Intracoastal Waterway and the gorge in Bogue Inlet, then 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar; a channel, 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide to a turning basin, 200 feet wide and 350 feet long, at Swansboro; a channel, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide in New River Inlet, and a connecting channel of the same dimensions to the Intracoastal Waterway near the mouth of New River; a channel, 10 feet deep, and 90 feet wide in New River, between the Intracoastal Waterway and the Seaboard Coastline Railroad bridge at Jacksonville, N. C.; a channel through New Topsail Inlet, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide and a channel from New Topsail Inlet to the Intracoastal Waterway by way of Old Topsail Creek, 7 feet deep and 80 feet wide; a 6-2 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT channel, 7 feet deep and 80 feet wide, in Banks Channel, from New Topsail Inlet, paralleling the barrier beach, to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; a channel, 14 feet deep and 400 feet wide, across the ocean bar at Masonboro Inlet, with suitable jetties at the entrance, thence 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide to the channel of the Intracoastal Waterway at Wrightsville Beach by way of Banks and Motte Channels; a turning basin, 15 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 700 feet long, on the east side of Banks Channel near Masonboro Inlet, with three 15-pile dolphins therein; a channel, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar at Carolina Beach Inlet to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; a channel, 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 8,000 feet long, to and including a turning basin of the same depth, 130 feet wide and 180 feet long, at Carolina Beach; a yacht basin, 230 feet wide, 450 feet long, and 12 feet deep, at the town of Southport, connected to the waterway by a suitable channel of the same depth; and maintenance of the general navigation features of the North Carolina State Ports Authority Small-Boat Harbor at Southport, consisting of an entrance channel, 150 feet wide and 400 feet long, an eastern harbor-access channel, 70 feet wide and 430 feet long, a western harbor-access channel, 60 feet wide and 185 feet long, to a turning basin, 180 feet wide and 550 feet long, all to a depth of 6 feet. A modification providing for the replacement of five Federally owned and operated highway bridges was authorized in December 1970. A modification providing for 100 percent Federal funding for Walter B. Jones (formerly Wilkerson Creek) and Joseph P. Knapp (formerly Coinjock) bridges was authorized in October 1976. A modification providing for 100 percent Federal funding at Core Creek, Hobucken, and Fairfield Bridges was authorized in November 1986. Estimated Federal cost is $75,630,000 (1997). The tidal lock at Snow's Cut was deauthorized September 23, 1986, under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. The 12-foot-deep channel in Peltier Creek was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The 12-foot deep channel modification to New River was deauthorized January 1, 1990, under Sec. 1002, PL 99-662. The jetties at Masonboro Inlet are complete except for the training wall. The training wall has an estimated Federal cost of $3,470,000 (1992). The wall was reclassified to the "inactive" category on August 14,1992. A Section 111 project to mitigate damages caused by the north jetty was authorized in October 1980 and was completed in April 1981. Length of channels and basins total 347.7 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. In the waterway north of Neuse River, variations in water surface due to winds seldom exceed 2 feet above or below mean stage. Between Beaufort and the Cape Fear River, normal tidal range varies from 3.5 feet at the inlets to 1 foot at points between. Average range of tide is 4 feet on the ocean side of Bogue Inlet and 2.5 feet just inside the inlet. At New River, tidal range varies from 3.5 feet at the inlet to 1 foot at the head of the marshes and zero at Tar Landing, 31 miles above. From Cape Fear River, N. C., to Little River, S. C., mean tidal range varies between 4.7 feet in Cape Fear River and 4 feet at the intermediate inlets, and 2 feet at points midway between the inlets. On October 15, 1954 (Hurricane Hazel), the tide at Holden Beach reached an elevation of 17.6 feet. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date except for the uncompleted modifications. The State of North Carolina has agreed to keep the bridges toll free and upon completion of each bridge, accept maintenance, replacement, and ownership responsibilities thereof. They have withdrawn their offer to contribute 25 percent of the first cost. The Water Resources Acts of 1976 and 1986 modified the terms of local cooperation to delete the non-Federal cost-sharing requirement for all five bridges. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Adjustment of relocations cost for Core Creek Bridge resulted in a decrease of $24,590. Construction of Fairfield Bridge was initiated at a cost of $4,269,212. Maintenance: Through Channel - During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boat Snell conducted clearing and snagging operations and maintained dredging ranges and mooring facilities at a cost of $473,750. Between December 15, 1997 and June 2, 1998, the contract dredges Blue Ridge, Marion dredged 293,273 cubic yards from shoals in the through channel and constructed dikes at a cost of $2,225,481. Between January 7 and April 14, 1998, the contract dredge Cherokee dredged 336,997 cubic yards from Bear Inlet to Brown Inlet at a cost of $1,606,683. Between January 17, 1998 and April 8, 1998, the contract dredge Richmond dredged 160,712 cubic yards from shoals at the inlet crossings at a cost of $825,748. Between March 2 and April 6, 1998, the contract dredge Illinois removed 21,358 cubic yards from shoals at the Carolina Beach Inlet crossing at a cost of $70,295. Cost in connection with prior year maintenance dredging of the through channel was $107,098. Costs for prior year dredging at inlet crossings were $3,440. Engineering and design for future years dredging for the through channel cost $41,755 and for the inlet crossings cost $73,236. Mosquito control in disposal areas costs $90,944. Real estate support for easements and audit cost $2,514. Long-term environmental dredging and monitoring study cost $28,477. Periodic inspections of Fairfield Bridge cost $11,580. One highway bridge was operated and maintained at a cost of $246,823. Condition and operations studies cost $436,806. Updating the Colonial Nesting Waterbirds inventory database cost $2,000. Sturgeon survey of major drainage areas cost $45,500. Encroachment and boundary surveys at Snows Cut cost $740. Dredged material management plan cost $72,968. Dredged material facility surveys and maintenance cost $147,134. Bogue Inlet - Between November 17 and December 14, 1997, the U.S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 53,630 cubic yards from shoals in Bogue Inlet at a cost of $199,000. During intermittent periods, the U.S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 51,765 cubic yards from shoals in Bogue Inlet at a cost of $216,000. Dredged material management plan for Bogue Inlet cost $1,451. Condition and operation studies cost $41,411. Carolina Beach Inlet - During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 159,058 cubic yards from shoals in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $658,050. During intermittent periods the U.S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 101,765 cubic yards from shoals in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $278,600. During intermittent periods 6-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 the sidecasting dredge Fry removed 60,090 cubic yards from shoals in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $96,000. Dredged material management plan for Carolina Beach Inlet cost $1,222. Condition and operation studies cost $38,294. Masonboro Inlet - Between March 5 and April 29,1998, the contract dredge R.S. Weeks bypassed 555,654 cubic yards of sand to Masonboro Island in connection with the Wrightsville Beach nourishment at a cost of $1,328,131 and placed 605,140 cubic yards of sand on Wrightsville Beach at a cost of $1,436,812. Condition and operation studies cost $2,925. New River Inlet - During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 348,060 cubic yards from shoals in New River Inlet at a cost of $624,000. During intermittent periods the sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 139,586 cubic yards from shoals in New River Inlet at a cost of $285,000. Cost in connection with prior year maintenance dredging of the Channel to Jacksonville was $2,187. Dredged material management plan for New River Inlet cost $1,486. Condition and operation studies and project operation management plan cost $20,410. New Topsail Inlet - Between January 19 and February 3, 1998, the contract dredge Blue Ridge removed 108,695 cubic yards from Topsail Creek crossing at a costs of $410,455. Dredged material management plan for New Topsail Inlet cost of $262,575. During intermittent periods the sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 24,458 cubic yards from shoals in New Topsail Inlet at a cost of $162,000. Between September 29 and 30, 1998, the U.S. debris boat Snell repaired mooring facilities at a cost of $14,000. Cost in connection with prior year dredging was $432. Condition and operation studies and project operation management plan cost $24,203. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in September 1997 except for three tie-up dolphins at Masonboro Inlet and the replacement of Fairfield Bridge. The construction contract was awarded December 22, 1997 with completion scheduled for December 2000. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1998, was $252,730,296, of which $75,353,321 was for new work including $86,851 in contributed funds and $177,376,975 was for maintenance, including $667,300 in contributed funds. 4. AVON HARBOR, N.C. Location. The project is located on the east coast of North Carolina, 9 miles north of Cape Hatteras. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a direct channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 3.5 miles long from the depth in Pamlico Sound southeast to a basin of the same depth, 100 feet wide and 300 feet long at Avon. Plane of reference is mean low water. Variations in the water surface of Pamlico Sound due to winds, seldom range as much as 2 feet above or below mean stage; however, severe windstorms will double or triple that variation. The original project was authorized bythe 1945 River and Harbor Act (H.D. 316, 76* Cong., 1st sess.) and modification for direct channel authorized May 5, 1965, under Section 107, River and Harbor Act of 1960. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are five wharves in the basin at Avon, with a total frontage of about 300 feet. These facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design for future years pipeline dredging cost $4,264. Project condition surveys costs $3,468. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed July 1965. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1962.) 5. BEAUFORT HARBOR, N.C. Location. The project is just inside Beaufort Inlet, adjacent to Morehead City Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for stopping erosion at Beaufort Inlet by jetties and sand fences at Fort Macon and Shackleford points and other shore protection; channels 15 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide in Bulkhead and Gallants Channels, except for a depth of 12 feet in the upper 5,000 feet of Gallants Channel; a harbor of refuge in Town Creek 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long connected to Gallants Channel by a channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 1,400 feet long; a basin 12 feet deep, 600 feet wide in front of the town of Beaufort except for a channel 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide through the basin; a stone bulkhead from Town Marsh across Bird Shoal to the west end of Carrot Island; a channel 14 feet deep, 70 feet wide, and 1,900 feet long from Bulkhead Channel to a turning basin 14 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 300 feet long near the upper end of Morgan Creek; and a channel in Taylors Creek 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide, extending about 2.6 miles easterly from about opposite Marsh Street in Beaufort to Lennoxville Point at North River, except for an 800-foot-long section at the east end which is 12 feet deep. Total length of channels is 7.3 miles. Average tidal range is 2.5 feet at Beaufort and 3.5 feet at the inlet. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully compiled with to date. Terminal facilities. There are fifty waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 2,000 feet. These facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project condition surveys cost $358. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in October 1965 except for the Morgan Creek modification which was completed November 12, 1983. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Costs under existing project to September 30, 1998, were $827,040 for new work, including $34,000 contributed funds and $4,353,375 for maintenance, including $326,225 contributed funds, a total of $5,180,415. 6. BELHAVEN HARBOR, N. C. Location. The town of Belhaven is at the junction of Pantego Creek and Pungo River, about 11 miles above the mouth of the latter. The harbor consists of the lower reaches 6-4 WILMINGTON, N. C. , DISTRICT of Pantego Creek and is about 6,000 feet long. Pungo River forms part of the Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk and the St. Johns River. Norfolk is 130 miles north of Belhaven and Beaufort 66 miles south. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 123.) Existing project. This provides for a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide, extending from deep water in Pungo River to a point about 800 feet east of the highway bridge, with a turning basin 800 feet long and 300 feet wide at the upper end; and for the construction of timber breakwaters at the mouth of Pantego Creek. Pungo River is a nontidal stream with little slope. Variations in the water surface, due to winds, seldom exceed 2 feet above or below mean stage. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of July 3,1930 and June 20,1938. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 12 wharves along the town waterfront, all of timber construction; one is owned by the town and is open to all without charge; four have rail connections. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Adjustment in prior year costs for north and south timber breakwater repair cost resulted in a decrease of $3,517. Preparation of the dredge material management plan preliminary assessment cost $1,183. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in September 1940. 7. CAPE FEAR RIVER, N. C. ABOVE WILMINGTON Location. The river is formed by confluence of the Deep and Haw Rivers at Moncure, Chatham County, N. C., and empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Cape Fear, near the southern extremity of the State. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 426.) Previous project. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing projects. The authorized project provides for a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Wilmington to a turning basin 400 feet wide and 550 feet long at Navassa (2.9 miles); a channel 12 feet deep and 140 feet wide from Navassa to mileboard 30 at Acme, with five channel cutoffs, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide to eliminate sharp bends; a channel 8 feet deep from mileboard 30 to Fayetteville by constructing three locks and dams and by dredging river shoals; and recreational facilities at the locks and dams. Total length of the project channels is 113.9 miles. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of June 25, 1910; June 26, 1934; August 30, 1935; August 26, 1937; October 27, 1965; and Section 4, Flood Control Act of 1944. For further details see Annual Reports for 1962 and 1970. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are twelve waterfront facilities on the river, with a total frontage of 1,190 feet. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During intermittent periods, the U.S. debris boat Snell conducted clearing and snagging operations at a cost of $116,000. Repair and rehabilitation of recreation facilities at the three locks and dams cost $31,802. Condition and operation studies cost $5,500. Operation and maintenance of three locks and dams cost $279,270. Engineering and design for paving of O&M and recreation roads cost $16,099. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in June 1970. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1998, was $26,052,103 of which $3,610,454 (including $1,226,385 public works) was for new work and $22,441,649 for maintenance. 8. CHANNEL FROM PAMLICO SOUND TO RODANTHE, N.C. Location. East coast of North Carolina, 25 miles north of Cape Hatteras. (See coast and Geodetic Survey chart 1232.) Existing project. A channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 1.25 miles long from Pamlicao Sound to a basin at the shore end near Rodanthe of same depth, 80 to 100 feet wide, and total length of about 1,200 feet. Project authorized by River and harbor Act of 1945. (H.D. 234, 7 6t Cong., 1st sess.) (For further details see Annual Report for 1950.) Local cooperation. Local interest must furnish suitable spoil disposal areas for new work and maintenance. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Four terminals with combined frontage of 130 feet, along with bulkheaded protion, are considered adequate. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project condition surveys cost $917. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed March 1965. 9. DRUM INLET, N.C. Location. Drum Inlet is an opening through the barrier beach which separates Core Sound from the Atlantic Ocean. It is about 1,100 feet wide and is about 35 miles northeast of Beaufort and opposite the village of Atlantic. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1233 and 419.) Existing project. The project provides for a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 200 feet wide from the gorge in the inlet to the federally improved channel in Core Sound, about 1 mile. The mean range tide is 3.8 feet in the ocean and 0.3 foot in Core Sound at Atlantic. The project also provides for a channel 150 feet wide and 9 feet deep from the gorge in the inlet to deep water in the Atlantic Ocean. The Core Sound portion of the project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of June 20, 1938. (H.D. 414, 75th Cong., 2nd sess.) The channel from the inlet to the Atlantic Ocean was authorized under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between December 19, 1997 and January 18, 1998, the U.S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 67,455 cubic yards from shoals in Drum Inlet at a cost of $210,045. Between November 17 and December 9, 1997, the U.S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 30,413 cubic yards from 6-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 shoals in Drum Inlet at a cost of $135,098. Costs in connection with prior year pipeline dredging were $4,818. Condition and operation studies cost $21,945. A navigation project management plan was prepared at a cost of $1,485. The environmental assessment for maintenance dredging by government plant was prepared at a cost $6,704. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in February 1972. The Limited Reevaluation Report was completed in September 1994. It determined that resumption of Federal maintenance is economically justified and is environmentally acceptable. Pipeline dredging was completed in March 1997. 10. FAR CREEK, N.C. Location. Flows easterly from Engelhard into Pamlico Sound, about 95 miles south of Norfolk, Va. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1232.) Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep and 80 to 100 feet wide from Pamlico Sound to highway bridge at Engelhard, with a turning basin 12 feet deep, 200 feet wide and 900 feet long at the head. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930, and May 17, 1950. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Project is served by 12 waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 2,300 feet, all privately owned. Existing facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project condition surveys cost $7,246. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed June 1957. 11. LOCKWOODS FOLLY RIVER, N. C. Location. The project is located on the south coast of North Carolina about 12 miles west of Cape Fear River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1236 and Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep at low water from the ocean to the bridge at Supply 12.5 miles above, to be obtained by dredging through oyster rocks and mudflats. The completed river portion of the project above the waterway was reclassified to the active category in 1971. Lunar tidal ranges in Lockwoods Folly River are 4.5 feet at the inlet and 2 feet at the head of navigation at Supply. The existing project was authorized by the 1890 River and Harbor Act. (See Annual Report for 1887, page 1099.) A modification to enlarge the channel from 6 to 12 feet deep and from 100 to 150 feet wide across the ocean bar for a distance of4,700 feet was approved by the Chief of Engineers on June 3, 1980, under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. During dredging operations it became apparent that establishment of the 12-foot project would not be possible with currently available equipment. Therefore, the Chief of Engineers, on December 20, 1983, approved the District's recommendation that further construction activity for the Lockwoods Folly Inlet project be suspended until suitable equipment becomes available and that the project be maintained at an 8-foot project depth in the interim. Local cooperation. For the new modification local interests must: (a) pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest, one-half of the first costs of construction allocated to recreational boating; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages resulting from changes in ground water levels, saltwater intrusion, or wave action due to the construction works, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractor; (c) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, and (d) provide depths in berthing areas commensurate with the project depths, and provide service facilities. Terminal facilities. Thirty-one piers and wharves on the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway at Holden Beach, about 1.25 miles west of Lockwoods Folly Inlet, with a total frontage of about 1,980 feet available. At Dixons Landing, about 2 miles upstream of the inlet, there are five wharves with a total frontage of 240 feet. Numerous natural landings are used for loading and unloading small boats. Berthing space in the vicinity of Lockwoods Folly Inlet totals about 2,220 feet. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between January 19 and February 2, 1998, the U.S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 39,125 cubic yards from shoals in Lockwoods Folly Inlet at a cost of $118,400. Between October 9 and October 19, 1997, the U.S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 37,760 cubic yards from shoals in Lockwoods Folly Inlet at a cost of $70,000. During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boat Snell repaired mooring facilities at a cost of $21,000. Condition and operation studies cost $20,927. Preparation of the dredge material management plan preliminary assessment cost $4,730. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the project was completed in June 1965 except for the latest modification. Work was initiated on the latest modification on September 23, 1982, with a depth of 8 feet being reached in October 1982. The project will be maintained at the 8- foot depth until suitable equipment for deepening to 12 feet becomes available. 12. MANTEO (SHALLOWBAG) BAY, N. C. Location. The project is located on the northeastern side of Roanoke Island, North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1229.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 14 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the Atlantic Ocean through Oregon Inlet with connecting 12-foot channels, 100 feet wide, to Pamlico Sound, Manteo, and Wanchese; and a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide connecting the Manteo-Oregon Inlet Channel with Albemarle Sound. Length of channels is 25.4 miles. A newly authorized modification provides for stabilization of Oregon Inlet with a dual rubble-mound jetty system, including means for sand transfer to the downdrift beach; a channel, 20 feet deep and 400 feet wide, through the ocean bar at Oregon Inlet; a channel, 14 feet deep and 120 6-6 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT feet wide, from the gorge in Oregon Inlet to and through Roanoke Sound to and including a 15-acre basin of the same depth at Wanchese; and a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 12-foot-deep channel in Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay through Roanoke and Albemarle Sounds to deep water near the northern end of Croatan Sound. The 12-foot Croatan Sound channel has been deferred due to lack of economic justification. The estimated Federal cost for the modification is $84,557,000 (1998). The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of June 25,1910; October 17, 1940; May 17, 1950; and December 31, 1970; and under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. For the new modification, local interests must: (a) provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, including suitable areas required for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and subsequent maintenance; (c) continue to provide and maintain adequate terminal and transfer facilities, open to all on equal terms, in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers; (d) provide and maintain necessary mooring and berthing facilities in any enlarged basin, open to all on equal terms, in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers; (e) provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with depths provided in the related project areas; (f) accomplish such alterations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage, electrical powerlines, telephone lines, or other utility facilities as well as their maintenance; (g) establish a competent and properly constituted public body empowered to regulate the use, growth, and free development of the harbor facilities, with the understanding that said facilities will be open to all on equal terms; (h) establish regulations prohibiting the discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other pollutants in the water of the harbor by the users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control; ((i) perform, or, cause to be performed, any investigation for hazardous substances as are determined necessary to identify the existence and extent of any hazardous substances regulated under CERCLA and assume complete financial responsibility, as between the Federal government and the non-Federal sponsor, for all necessary clean up and response costs; (j) pay 10 percent of the costs allocated to navigation during construction presently estimated at $9,324,000; (k) pay an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to navigation within a period of30 years following completion of construction offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations (except utility relocations), presently estimated at $9,315,000. Reasonable assurances have been received. The State ofN. C. has constructed the Wanchese Harbor portion and was reimbursed under Sec. 215, PL 90-483. Terminal facilities. The project is served by 33 waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 3,320 feet. Additional wharves and facilities will be provided with the enlarged basin at Wanchese. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Work continued on the economic update, GDM supplement and EIS supplement at a cost of $351,425. Work on the sand bypassing and fishery management plan continued at a cost of $45,794. Additional engineering and design is being accomplished under pre-construction engineering and design. Maintenance: Between October 1 and November 25, 1997, the contract dredge Richmond dredged 134,563 cubic yards from shoals in Old House Channel and Channel to Wanchese at a cost of $520,017. Between September 1 and September 30, 1997, the contract dredge M.V. Atchafalaya dredged 137,721 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar and vicinity of the bridge at a cost of $729,435. Cost in connection with prior year contract dredging of the ocean bar was $40,449.'Cost in connection with prior year contract of the ocean bar dredging by the contract hopper dredge Mermentau was $275,715. The U.S. sidecasting dredge Schweizer removed from Oregon Inlet 130,130 cubic yards between October 1 and December 15, 1997 and 208,587 cubic yards between June 1 and September 30, 1998 at a cost of $641,700. Between January 17 and February 25, 1998, the sidecasting dredge U.S. Merritt removed 59,148 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $360,000. Engineering and design for dredging Old House Channel and Channel to Wanchese cost $369. Cost in connection with future years dredging of Old House Channel and Channel to Wanchese was $16,945. Project monitoring cost $54,601. The environmental dredging study and associated monitoring costs $21,184. National Ocean Survey tidal datum determination cost $2,000. Preparation of the dredged material management plan cost $28,751. Construction of oyster reefs for mitigation was completed at a cost of $495. Island H disposal area surveys and monitoring cost $1,737. Condition and operation studies cost $120,302. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for the latest modification. (For further detail, see Annual Report of 1962.) 13. MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located on the northern shore of Bogue Sound, adjacent to Beaufort Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Previous project. For details see page 470 of Annual Report for 1935. Existing project. A channel 47 feet deep and 450 feet wide from deep water in the Atlantic Ocean through the ocean bar at Beaufort Inlet with three wideners; a cutoff channel 400 feet wide; and a depth of 45 feet in the east leg of the basin, including a 1,350 foot diameter turning area; a channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide from the turning basin to Sixth Street, Morehead City, then 12 feet deep, 200 to 400 feet wide to Tenth Street; then 6 feet deep, 75 feet wide, to Bogue Sound. Project also includes assumption of maintenance in the northwest leg and the east leg extension. Jetties at Beaufort Inlet were reclassified to the "active" category on March 8, 1972. The jetties were deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The project was authorized by the 1958 River and Harbor Act (S.D. 54, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.), the River and Harbor Act of December 31, 1970 and the Water Resources Development Act of 1992. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. 6-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Twenty-six waterfront facilities serve the port, with a total frontage of 1,250 feet. Marine terminals provide 5,300 feet of berthing space, with a depth alongside of 35 feet, and facilities for transfer of cargoes between rail and water carriers. Improvements to facilities were completed in 1969. For further details see Port Series No. 12, revised 1987, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between November 2, 1997 and February 16, 1998, the contract dredges Sugar Island, Northerly Island dredged 1,163,563 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar at a cost of $5,359,507. Between October 1 and 11, 1997, the contract dredge Hampton Roads removed 18,233 cubic yards from shoals in the inner harbor. Because of adjustments in prior year cost on this contract the FY 98 cost was a negative $155,984. Engineering and design for future years ocean bar dredging cost $81,577. Ocean dumping monitoring cost $7,398. Adjustment in cost for benthic sampling resulted in a decrease of $22,00. The sea turtle environmental study cost $5,749. The national ocean survey tidal datum determination cost $400. Condition and operation studies and project operation management cost $119,681. Surveys for the State Ports Authority were accomplished at a contributed funds cost of $47,998. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete with the latest modification being physically complete in April 1994. (For further details, see Annual Report of 1962.) Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1998, was $88,898,533 of which $15,892,219 was for new work, including $2,731,996 contributed funds (including $553,477 public works funds) and $73,006,314 for maintenance, including $1,798,329 contributed funds. 14.NEUSE RIVER, N. C. Location. Neuse River rises in the north central part of North Carolina near Raleigh, flows generally southeasterly to a point 30 miles below New Bern where it empties into Pamlico Sound. Total length about 350 miles. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 538 and 1231.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 300 feet wide and 12 feet deep at mean low water from a point 10 miles below, up to, and in front of New Bern; thence 120 feet wide and 10 feet deep, from the railroad bridge at New Bern to a point about 3 miles upstream; a channel 4 feet deep at dead low water to Kinston; and, during 9 months of the year, 3 feet deep at dead low water to Smithfield, to be obtained by dredging and snagging. The section included in the project is about 160 miles long. Estimated cost of new work is $488,200 (1964). The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of June 18, 1878; June 13, 1902; January 21, 1927; and two modifications, one providing for a channel 120 feet wide and 10 feet deep was authorized October 15, 1965 and the other providing for a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from the highway bridge across the mouth of Dawson Creek to deep water in the Neuse River was authorized August 4, 1969, both under authority of Section 107, River and Harbor Act of 1960. The 300-foot wide channel in front of New Bern was deauthorized August 5, 1977. Local cooperation. For the Section 107 modification, local interests musts provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable spoil disposal areas and necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction and maintenance of the project; continue to provide and maintain, without cost to the United States, necessary mooring facilities and utilities, including a public landing, with suitable supply facilities, open to all on equal terms; establish regulations prohibiting discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other pollutants in the waters of the creek by users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws and regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control. Terminal facilities. There are thirty wharves on this stream, of which two are below New Bern, sixteen at or near New Bern, three at Bridgeton, and nine above New Bern. Total frontage is 2,900 feet. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Preparation of the dredge material management plan preliminary assessment cost $5,765. Project condition surveys cost $583. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in October 1971. (For further details, see Annual report for 1950.) 15.ORACOKE INLET, N. C. Location. The inlet connects Pamlico Sound with the Atlantic Ocean, about 30 miles southwest of Cape Hatteras and 43 miles northeast of Cape Lookout. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel across the ocean bar 18 feet deep and 400 feet wide. Construction of a jetty extending from Ocracoke Island to the Atlantic Ocean was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of July 14, 1960. For further details, see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Preparation of the dredge material management plan preliminary assessment cost $1,451. Project condition surveys cost $522. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in August 1971. 16.PAMLICO AND TAR RIVERS, N. C. Location. The two names apply to the same river, known as the Tar above and as the Pamlico below Washington, N.C. This stream rises in Person County, flows southeasterly 180 miles to Washington, thence 38 miles to Pamlico Sound. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 537.) Previous project. For details see page 502 of Annual Report for 1938. 6-8 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 200 feet wide from 12-foot contour in the river below Washington to Atlantic Coastline Railroad bridge at Washington; thence 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide to a turning basin of same depth, 200 feet wide, 300 feet long in Hardee Creek, 1,500 feet above its mouth; thence 6 feet deep, 75 feet wide to Greenville; thence 20 inches deep, 60 feet wide to Tarboro; and thence to clear the natural channel to Little Falls. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of August 14, 1876; March 3, 1879; August 11, 1888; March 2, 1907; July 25, 1912; July 3, 1930; and August 26, 1937. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 54 wharves on the portion of this river under improvement, of which 34 are along the waterfront at Washington, 19 between Washington and the mouth, and only 1 in useable condition above Washington. They have a frontage of 3,570 feet. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Letter report to realign the channel in the vicinity of Washington, N.C. cost $5,369. Preparation of the dredge material management plan preliminary assessment cost $9,011. Project condition surveys cost $3,550. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. (For details see Annual Report for 1962.) 17.ROANOKE RIVER, N. C. Location. Rises in Blue Ridge Mountains, west of Roanoke, Va., flows southeasterly about 398 miles, and empties into westerly end of Albemarle Sound, N.C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1228 and Post Route Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Albemarle Sound to 1 mile above Plymouth, N.C. thence a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide to Hamilton; and thence a channel 8 feet deep and 80 feet wide to Palmyra Landing. Project authorized by River and Harbor Acts of March 3, 1871; July 3, 1930; and June 20, 1938. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Thirty-two waterfront facilities serve the waterway. Facilities appear adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Preparation of the dredge material management plan preliminary assessment cost $3,798. Condition and operation surveys cost $241. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. 18. ROLLINSON CHANNEL, N. C. Location. The project is located about 3.5 miles northeast of Hatteras Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 5.1 miles long from deep water in Pamlico Sound to and including a basin of the same depth, 80 to 150 feet wide, and 1,450 feet long at Hatteras; a rubble-mound breakwater on each side of the channel at the entrance to the basin; and a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from that depth in Hatteras Inlet gorge to Rollinson Channel, in the vicinity of the basin at Hatteras. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of August 30, 1935; March 2, 1945; September 3, 1954; and October 23, 1962. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Six waterfront facilities serve the channel, with a total frontage of 926 feet. Existing facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project condition surveys cost $4,109. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed August 22, 1966. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) 19.SHALLOTTE RIVER, N. C. Location. A small stream in Brunswick County, N.C., rising in the large swamp country between Cape Fear and Waccamaw Rivers, known as Green Swamp. Stream is about 30 miles long and flows southerly into Atlantic Ocean and 20 miles west of mouth of Cape Fear River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 835.) Previous project. For details see page 1806 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. A channel 4 feet deep at mean low water and 36 feet wide from the mouth to town of Shallotte. Section under improvement is 9 miles long. River is tidal, range varying from 5 feet at mouth to 3 feet at Shallotte. Hurricane Hazel in 1954 caused a tide about 16 feet above mean sea level in the river at Shallotte Point. Project authorized by River and Harbor Acts of March 4, 1913, and January 21, 1927. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. A marine railway and shop at Shallotte Point and another in town of Shallotte with facilities for building and repairing boats up to about 60 feet long. On Shallotte River, there are 17 docks varying from 16 to 321 feet of frontage, providing 1,334 feet of wharf and docking space. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Preparation of the dredge material management plan preliminary assessment cost $9,232. Condition and operation surveys cost $2,300. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed in 1929. 20. SILVER LAKE HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located at the southwest end of Ocracoke Island, a portion of the Outer Banks on the southeast coast of North Carolina, separating Pamlico Sound from the Atlantic Ocean. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for basin depths of 12 feet in Silver Lake Harbor; an entrance channel 12 feet deep and 60 feet wide, from the basin to Teaches Hole Channel; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 6-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 feet wide, from the entrance channel through Big Foot Slough Bar to the 12-foot contour in Pamlico Sound; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from the entrance channel through Teaches Hole Channel to the gorge in Ocracoke Inlet, a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, across Bluff Shoal; and for rubble-mound training walls on the north and south sides of the entrance channel, 300 feet and 400 feet long, respectively. Mean tidal ranges are 1.9 feet in the throat of Ocracoke Inlet and 1 foot at Ocracoke. Variations in the water surface of Pamlico Sound are generally due to winds and seldom exceed 1 or 2 feet above or below mean stage. Severe storms have raised the water surface as much as 7 feet above normal water level at Ocracoke. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Twelve waterfront facilities serve the harbor. These facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Repairs to the south jetty cost $178,736. Preparation of the dredge material management plan preliminary assessment cost $6,405. Project condition surveys cost $3,726. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed July 28, 1970. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) 21. WATERWAY CONNECTING PAMLICO SOUND AND BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located in Core Sound, west of the outer banks of eastern Nortsh Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 420 and 1233.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a through channel to Core Sound 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide from Pamlico Sound to Beaufort Harbor; an alternative route of the same dimensions through Back Sound by way of channels at the east and west ends of Harkers Island; a channel 7 feet deep and 70 feet wide from the through channel to the local harbor at Cedar Island, including the authorized passage and future maintenance of a channel through the existing private basin, and an access channel 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide and about 400 feet long to a basin the same depth, 60 feet by 100 feet; a channel 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide from the through channel to Atlantic; a channel 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide, with a basin 200 feet by 500 feet, the same depth, at Sealevel; a channel 5 feet deep and 75 feet wide, with basin 150 feet by 130 feet, the same depth, at Davis; a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide with a basin 100 feet by 600 feet, the same depth, at Marshallberg; an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide, from Back Sound to harbor of refuge 120 feet by 250 feet, the same depth in Brooks Creek at the west end of Harkers Island; and a channel 7 feet deep and 70 feet wide, from the existing side channel at Atlantic, N.C., to the mouth of Little Port Brook; thence 7 feet deep and 50 feet wide, along the Brook to a basin 600 feet long, 180 feet wide, and 7 feet deep, with a breakwater, beginning at a point between the mouth of Little Port Brook and White Point, running along the channel approximately 2,000 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. The length of the authorized channels is about 50.6 miles. (See Table 6-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully compiled with to date for completed portion. Terminal facilities. Sixteen small wharves serve the waterway. Additional facilities are needed along Core Sound. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $1,000. Project condition surveys cost $9,005. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in September 1972. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1961.) 22. WILMINGTON HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located on the Cape Fear River, on southeast coast of North Carolina, between the Atlantic Ocean and Wilmington, North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 426.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1804 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 533 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized and constructed project provides for a channel 40 feet deep and 500 feet wide from the Atlantic Ocean through the ocean bar and entrance channels to Southport, thence 38 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the upper end of the anchorage basin (foot of Castle Street) at Wilmington, thence 32 feet deep and 400 feet wide, to Hilton Bridge over Northeast Cape Fear River; a 38-foot deep anchorage basin at Wilmington; a 32-foot-deep turning basin opposite the principal terminals; a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide, about 3 miles long, in Cape Fear River; and a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Hilton Bridge over Northeast Cape Fear River to a point 1.66 miles above, including a turning basin of the same depth, 700 feet wide and 500 feet long, at a point 1.25 miles above the bridge. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930; March 2, 1945; May 17, 1950; October 23, 1962; and March 10, 1964; under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. Three modifications to the project were authorized by the Water Resources Development Acts of November 17, 1986 (PL 99-662) and October 12, 1996 (PL104-303). These three modifications were subquently combined into one project modification by the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act for FY 98. The plan of improvement consists of deepening the ocean bar and entrance channels from the authorized depth of 40 feet to 44 feet; deepening the authorized 38-foot project to 42 feet up to and including the anchorage basin immediately upriver from the State Ports Authority dock, and extending the anchorage basin northward by 300 feet; widening the existing 400-foot wide channel to 600 feet over a total length of 6.2 miles including Lower and Upper Midnight and Lower Lilliput reaches; widen five turns and bends by 100 to 200 feet providing a total average channel width of 500 to 675 feet; widening the Fourth East Jetty Channel to 500 feet over a total length of 1.5 miles; deepening the 32-foot channel between Castle Street and the Hilton Railroad Bridge, the 32-foot turning basin just above the mouth of the Northeast Cape Fear river on the west side, and the 25-foot channel from the Hilton Railroad Bridge to 750 feet upstream all to a depth of 38 feet; deepening the 25-foot channel from 750 6-10 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT feet upstream of the Hilton Railroad Bridge to the turning basin near the upstream limits of the project to 34 feet, along with widening of the channel from 200 to 250 feet; and widening the turning basin from 700 to 800 feet; mitigation to include acquiring, by fee title, 30 acres of upland and construction of an embayment and acquisition of about 500 acres of existing marsh and upland areas for preservation of habitat to offset losses of wetlands and primary nursery areas; and environmental improvements to include acquiring, by easements or fee title, about 2,800 acres of wetlands, river bluffs, and ecotones and provision for a minimum number of specially designed corridors across the wetlands for industrial access to the river for the purpose of environmental enhancement. The environmental enhancement portion of the project is unprogrammed. The estimated Federal cost is $213,564,000. (For further details of authorization, see 1962 Annual Report.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date except for latest modification. In accordance with the cost-sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the non-Federal sponsor must (1) provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal area lands presently estimated at $1,876,000, and bear all operation and maintenance costs presently estimated at $6,000 annually; (2) modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project, presently estimated at $19,451,000; (3) pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction presently estimated at $69,491,000 and reimburse an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction (which is partially offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations (except utility relocations), and dredged material disposal areas, presently estimated at $6,000,000; and (4) pay 25 percent of the first costs allocated too fish and wildlife enhancement presently estimated at $1,525,000, and pay 25 percent of the costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of fish and wildlife facilities presently estimated at $16,000 annually, and provide and maintain, at its own expense, the local service facilities necessary to realize the benefits of the general navigation features, presently estimated at $23,093,000. Terminal facilities. Forty-three principal wharves, piers, and docks at port of Wilmington, with a berthing space of about 20,000 linear feet serve the harbor. These facilities handle general cargo and petroleum products. (For further details, see Port Series No. 12, revised 1987, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Cost adjustment in connection with termination of the project to deepen the ocean bar resulted in a decrease in Federal cost of $59,359 and a decrease in contributed funds cost of $32,551. Engineering and design costs in connection with the harbor deepening project cost $3,968,235. The south cell dike on Eagle Island was raised in connection with the 38 foot project at a contributed funds cost of $3,622,404. These funds were accepted under an advanced funds agreement with the State. Maintenance: Between October 1 and December 9, 1997, the contract dredge Cherokee dredged 442,291 cubic yards from shoals in the anchorage basin and river channel at a Federal cost of $789,249 and 32,818 cubic yards from shoals at the State Port at a contributed funds cost of $250,200. Between August 16 and September 30, 1998, the contract dredge Cherokee dredged 292,221 cubic yards from shoals in the anchorage basin and river channel at a Federal cost of $452,948 and 69,729 cubic yards from shoals at the State Port with contributed funds costs to be accrued in FY 1999. Disposal area 14 was repaired at a contributed funds cost of $257,600. Ditching of the Eagle Island north cell was completed at a contributed funds cost of $624. Prior year dredging from Smith Island Channel deposited on the beach at Bald Head Island under Section 933 cost $183,718 in Federal funds and $74,923 in contributed funds. Between December 4, 1997 and January 31, 1998, the contract dredges Dodge Island, Manhattan Island and Sugar Island dredged 1,191,454 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar at a cost of $2,133,662. During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boat Snell conducted clearing and snagging operations and maintained dredging ranges and mooring facilities at a cost of $56,000. A cost adjustment for prior year dredging by the contract dredge R.S. Weeks of shoals in the ocean bar in connection with the deepening project resulted in a decrease of $2,592. Between August 20 and September 12, 1998, the U.S. hopper dredge McFarland dredged 196,519 cubic yards from shoals in the river channel at a cost of $1,330,028. Engineering and design for future years dredging of the ocean bar cost $11,240. Mosquito control in disposal areas cost $115,837. Miscellaneous real estate activities cost $1,212. Sea turtle research project cost $8,211. Archaeological investigation in connection with the wood debris investigation and removal cost $18,037. Ocean dumping monitoring cost $15,204. Long term project management plan cost $139,512. Condition and operation studies and project operation management plan cost $396,056. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the project was completed August 1997 except for latest modification. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1962.) Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1997, was $176,831,979 of which $50,682,585 was for new work, including $10,438,990 contributed funds and $126,149,394 was for maintenance, including $9,604,686 contributed funds. The remaining uncompleted portion of the work authorized under the River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945, was deauthorized in accordance with Section 1001(b) (1), PL 99-662. Design for the latest modification has been initiated under PED with a new construction start scheduled for FY 98. 6-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Flood Control 23. CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN, N. C. Location. Work covered by this project consists of a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of the Cape Fear River in North Carolina within a radius of 100 miles from Raleigh, North Carolina. (See Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. Public Law 88-253, approved December 30, 1963, authorized three principal dams and reservoirs and a series of smaller reservoirs on tributaries of the Cape Fear River in accordance with the comprehensive plans in House Document 508, 87th Congress, 2d session. The act also provides that the appropriate agencies of the Departments of the Army and Agriculture shall conduct joint investigations and surveys and prepare a report on the upper tributaries of the Cape Fear River in the interest of watershed protection and flood prevention, and the conservation, development, utilization, and disposal of water. The report was prepared in compliance with provisions of Public Law 87-639. The study was unfavorable and has been submitted to Congress. No further action will be taken. A list of the dams and reservoirs included in the comprehensive plan follows. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) Estimates of cost as given are based on 1960 price levels, except the ones for B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake and Randleman Lake, which were revised in 1990, and Howards Mill Lake in 1980. These three projects have been authorized for construction in accordance with the above authorization. Howards Mill Lake was deauthorized in July 1995 due to the current lack of economic justification. Randleman Lake was reclassified to the "deferred" category in April 1992 due to the current lack of economic justification. Local cooperation. Requirements are given in the individual project reports. 23A. B. EVERET JORDAN DAM AND LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is located on the Haw River, N. C., 4.3 miles above its mouth, and 2.5 miles north of Moncure, N. C. Existing project. The project provides for an earth dam 1,330 feet long with a maximum height of 112 feet above the streambed, an uncontrolled, unpaved chute spillway, and a controlled 19-foot diameter outlet structure. Some saddle dikes are required beyond the spillway. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 753,500 acre-feet, of which 538,400 acre-feet is for flood control and a conservation pool of 215,100 acre-feet for water-quality control, water supply, and sedimentation. The reservoir will be operated as a unit of a coordinated system for control of floods in the Cape Fear River Basin and for water supply, water-quality control, and other purposes. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $147,600,000 (1996), consisting of $89,186,000 for construction, and $58,414,000 for lands and damages, including highway, railroad, and utility relocations. The existing project was authorized by Public Law 88-253 approved December 30,1963 (H.D. 508, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests must protect downstream channels from encroachments and obstructions which would adversely affect operation of the project; reimburse the Federal Government for all costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, presently estimated at $3,700,000 and bear all annual costs for operation, maintenance, and major replacements allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, an amount presently estimated at $46,000 annually; and contribute toward the cost of the ranger security buildings, an amount presently estimated at $44,000. A contract between the State of N. C. and the United States for water supply storage space was executed by ASA (CW) on April 10, 1988. In addition, the State of N. C. has leased the project for public park, recreational, fish, wildlife, and other natural resource management purposes and the estimated cost to the State for O&M under this lease is $806,000 annually. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Final settlement of the Crosswinds Campground claim cost $212,212. Crosswinds Marina breakwater cost $681,795. Total Federal expenditures were $995,559, including above items. Maintenance: Paving at Poe's Ridge was completed at a cost of $410,331. Adjustments in the cost of sedimentation surveys resulted in a negative cost of $35. Hurricane Fran clean up and repairs cost $5,184. Engineering and design for correction of erosion problems at gate 11 cost $4,962. Engineering and design for the management center addition cost $75,306. The inventory of rare, threatened and endangered species cost $25,260. Cost in connection with moving the Savannah real estate office to B. Everett Jordan was $7,544. Periodic inspection cost $3,676. Normal operation and maintenance cost $1,101,784. Condition at end of fiscal year. All facilities are complete except for the Mason House restoration. Impoundment was completed in February 1982, with dedication on May 1, 1982. Project completion is scheduled for June 1999. 24. CAROLINA BEACH AND VICINITY, N. C. Location. The project is in New Hanover County, about 15 miles southeast of Wilmington, N. C., on the peninsula which separates lower Cape Fear River from the Atlantic Ocean. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Map 834.) Existing project. The authorized project consists of two separable elements, the Carolina Beach Portion and Area South of Carolina Beach and provides for construction of a dune with a crown width of 25 feet at elevation 13.5 feet National geodetic vertical datum (NGVD), a berm with a crown width of 50 feet at elevation 10.5 feet NGVD for Carolina Beach and 9 feet NGVD for the Area South, a rock revetment at elevation 10.5 feet NGVD along the northern 2,050 feet fronted by a 130-foot wide berm at elevation 6.5 feet NGVD, extending about 32,000 feet from the northern limits of Carolina Beach to the southern limits of Kure Beach and Federal participation in the cost of beach nourishment for a period not to exceed 50 years from year of initial placement. The area south of Carolina Beach was reclassified to the active category, June 1985. Approved estimated Federal cost for new work is $169,015,000 (1997). 6-12 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT The project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H.D. 418, 87th Cong. 2d sess.). The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized Federal participation in future nourishment for 50 years. Local cooperation. For the Carolina Beach portion, local interests must: (a) Provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction; (b) make required relocations and alterations of streets, utilities, or structures; (c) contribute 37.9 percent of the total first cost, with credit allowed for (a) and (b); (d) hold the United States free from damages; (e) maintain all works after completion; (f) maintain continued public ownership of the shore; (g) adopt and enforce appropriate ordinances to provide for preservation of improvement and its protective vegetation; (h) control water pollution to extent necessary to safeguard health of bathers; and (i) at least annually inform interests affected that project will not provide any substantial protection from ocean surges higher in elevation than that of Hurricane Hazel, October 15, 1954. Requirements have been fulfilled to date for the town of Carolina Beach portion of the project. For the Area South portion, local interests must: (a) provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, including borrow areas; (b) pay 35 percent of the first costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of hurricane and storm damage reduction facilities; (c) contribute, in cash, 35 percent of the total project cost; (d) inform affected interests of the limitation of the protection afforded by the project no less than once each year; (e) assure that water pollution which would endanger the health of bathers will not be permitted to the extent of its power; (f) assure the continued public ownership of the above shore and its administration for public use during the 50 year economic life of the project; (g) to the extent of its powers, prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent obstruction of or encroachment on the project that would reduce the level of protection it affords or that would hinder operation or maintenance; and (h) provide and maintain necessary access roads, parking areas and other public use facilities open and available to all on equal terms. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of the Area South portion of the project continued at a Federal cost of $4,232,695 and a contributed funds cost of $2,971,280. Re-nourishment of the Carolina Beach portion was accomplished at a Federal cost of $1,918,687 and a contributed funds cost of $1,142,703. Future borrow sources investigations cost $48,677. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project construction for the Carolina Beach portion was completed August 12, 1982, except for grassing which was completed in September 1983. The latest increment of re-nourishment for the Carolina Beach portion was completed in April 1998 with the next increment scheduled for FY 2001. The contract for the initial re-nourishment of the Area South portion was awarded August 1996 with dredging completed in January 1998. Final contract completion is scheduled for May 1999. 25. CLINTON WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT, CLINTON, N.C. Location. The project is located at the confluence of Dollar Branch and Williams Old Mill Branch near the City of Clinton, about 60 miles south of Raleigh, North Carolina. Existing Project. The project consists of construction of a dike approximately 2200 feet long around the Clinton Wastewater Treatment Plant, with sumps and pumps to provide interior drainage. Loss of 1.8 acres of wetlands due to construction will be mitigated by purchase of a 4 acre mitigation site and by the Sponsor placing a restrictive covenant to preserve 6 acres of land already owned. The project provides protection from a 100 year flood event. Approved estimated Federal cost for construction implementation is $591,000 (1998). The project was approved by the Division Commander on April 7, 1998, under Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and disposal areas necessary for construction and subsequent maintenance and inspection of the project; accomplish without cost to the United States all relocation and alterations of buildings, transportation facilities, storm drains, utilities and other structures and improvements made necessary by the construction; provide, during the period of construction, an amount equal to not less than 25 percent, no greater than 50 percent, of total project costs, estimated at $197,000, at least 5 percent of which will be cash; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and subsequent maintenance, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States; assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $5,000,000 and assume financial responsibility for cleanup of hazardous and toxic waste, as defined in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, which is necessitated by the project. Such costs will not be considered part of the total project costs, nor will the sponsor receive credit for such costs it incurs. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Completion design and coordination with Sponsor on real estate acquisition cost $21,990. Condition at end of fiscal year. Real estate acquisition by the Sponsor is continuing. 26. DANVILLE (SOUTHSIDE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT), VA. Location. The project area is located in the City of Danville in Pittsylvania County in south-central Virginia, approximately 50 miles northeast of Greensboro, N.C. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Ringgold, Va. - N.C.) Existing project. The project will consist of a dike system around approximately one quarter of the Southside Sewage Treatment Plant. The dike will be constructed at an elevation equivalent to 3 feet above the 100-year frequency flood. This project will protect the control buildings which house electrical motors and pumps for the Treatment Plant. The utility road located to the back of the control building and the existing dike will be raised to the designed elevation while a completely new dike section will be constructed connecting the existing dike and the entrance road at the 6-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 designated elevation. Approved estimated Federal cost for construction is $192,000 (1997). The project was approved on July 11, 1995, under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interest shall contribute a minimum of 25 percent, but not to exceed 50 percent, total project costs, estimated at $64,000; provide a cash contribution equal to 5 percent of total project costs; provide all lands, easements, rights-of way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas, as may be determined by the Government to be necessary for the construction, operation, and maintenance of the project; shall provide or pay to the Government the cost of providing all retaining dikes, wasteweirs, bulkheads, and embankments, including all monitoring features and stilling basins, that may be required at any dredged material disposal area necessary for the construction of the project; shall accomplish or arrange for accomplishment at no cost to the Government all relocations (excluding railroad bridges and approaches thereto) determined necessary for construction of the project; shall hold and save the Government free from all damages arising from the construction, operation, maintenance, repair, replacement, and rehabilitation of the project and any project-related betterments, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the Government and its contractors; and assume financial responsibility for cleanup of hazardous and toxic waste, as defined in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, which is necessitated by the project. Such costs will not be considered part of the project costs, nor will the sponsor receive credit for such costs it incurs. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Cost in connection with project completion and the operation and maintenance manual were $8,575 Federal and $13,396 in contributed funds cost. Condition at end of fiscal year. The construction contract was awarded November 20, 1996 and was substantially complete in June 1997. 27. HAMLET CITY LAKE, HAMLET, N. C. Location. The project is located on Marks Creek within the city limits of Hamlet, N. C. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Hamlet, N. C.) Existing project. A small earth dam constructed in the 1930's under the WPA Program impounds the shallow 50- acre lake. Much of the City's storm runoff empties into the lake and has contributed significantly to a sediment problem. Local interests desire removal of accumulated sediment and debris including construction of sediment traps and providing other devices or equipment to prevent and abate the further deposit of sediment. Results from the bottom sampling and testing program show that contaminants are much more widespread than originally estimated. Approved estimated Federal cost for new work is $2,725,000 (1997). The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Sec. 206, PL 99-662). Local cooperation. Local interests must pay 25 percent of the total cost of the project estimated at $925,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Project construction was initiated at a Federal cost of $1,487,329 and a contributed funds cost of $280,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. The construction contract was awarded November 21, 1997 with completion scheduled for May 1999. 28. KING (WATER PLANT), N.C. Location. The project is located along the Yadkin River, about 10 miles northwest of Winston-Salem, N.C. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, King, N.C.) Existing project. The project consists of approximately 300 linear feet of riprap protection beginning at the north side of the water plant intake and extending 300 feet upstream along the east river bank. The toe of the bank protection is keyed into the stream bed and the rip-rap extends to the top of the bank, approximately 18 feet. Federal cost for construction implementation was$179,980. The project was approved by the Division Commander on September 7, 1994, under Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and disposal areas necessary for construction and subsequent maintenance and inspection of the project; accomplish without cost to the United States all relocation and alterations of buildings, transportation facilities, storm drains, utilities and other structures and improvements made necessary by the construction; provide, during the period of construction, an amount equal to not less than 25 percent, but not to exceed 50 percent, of total project costs, equal to $59,993, at least 5 percent of which will be cash; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and subsequent maintenance, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States; assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $500,000 and assume financial responsibility for cleanup of hazardous and toxic waste, as defined in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, which is necessitated by the project. Such costs will not be considered part of the total project costs, nor will the sponsor receive credit for such costs it incurs. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Costs in connection with project completion and closeout were $7,979 Federal and a credit to the Sponsor of $9,746 for required lands, easements, relocations, rightsof- way, and disposal areas. A cost adjustment resulted in a decrease of$3,248 in contributed funds cost. Condition at end of fiscal year. The construction contract was awarded July 30, 1996 and was substantially complete in October 1996. The Sponsor accepted the project for operation and maintenance on November 19, 1997. 29. MORAVIAN CREEK, WILKESBORO, N.C. Location. The project is located along 440 meters of Moravian Creek in the Town ofWilkesboro, Wilkes County, in western North Carolina. Existing Project. The project consists of a concrete flood 6-14 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT barrier approximately 200 meters long and up to 6 feet high, bank protection, clearing and snagging of the stream, grading and grassing of banks, and planting of native trees and shrubs. The project provides protection from a 15-year flood event of commercial structures. During design a second concrete barrier approximately 95 meters long and 6 to 18 inches high was determined necessary to provide the 15-year protection. Approved estimated Federal cost for construction implementation is $576,000 (1998). The project was approved by the Division Commander on September 30, 1998, under Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interest must provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and disposal areas necessary for construction and subsequent maintenance and inspection of the project; accomplish without cost to the United States all relocation and alterations of buildings, transportation facilities, storm drains, utilities and other structures and improvements made necessary by the construction; provide, during the period of construction, and amount equal to not less than 25 percent, but not greater than 50 percent, of total project costs, estimated at $192,000, at least 5 percent of which will be cash; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and subsequent maintenance, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: completion of design cost $45,357. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was approved for construction September 30, 1998. After commitment of construction funds, the PCA will be executed and the Sponsor will initiate acquisition of real estate. 30. N.C. AQUARIUM, DARE COUNTY, N.C. Location. The project area is located on the west side of Roanoke Island in eastern North Carolina near Manteo. (See quadrangle sheet, Manteo, N.C.) Existing project. The project consists of replacing approximately 760 linear feet of dilapidated timber bulkhead. The existing bulkhead was demolished, the shoreline was graded to a 3.OH:1.OV slope and armor stone was placed on the slope. Federal cost for construction implementation was $500,000. The project was approved by the Division Commander on August 3, 1995, under Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interest shall contribute a minimum of 25 percent, but not to exceed 50 percent, of total project costs, equal to $208,000; provide a cash contribution equal to 5 percent of total project costs; provide all lands, easements, rights-of way, and suitable borrow and dredged or excavated material disposal areas that the Government determines for the construction, operation, and maintenance of the project; shall perform or ensure performance of all relocations that the Government determines to be necessary for the construction, operation and maintenance of the project; shall hold and save the Government free from all damages arising from the construction, operation, maintenance, repair, replacement, and rehabilitation of the project and any project-related betterments, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the Government and its contractors; assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $500,000; and assume financial responsibility for cleanup of hazardous and toxic waste, as defined in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, which is necessitated by the project. Such costs will not be considered part of the project costs, nor will the sponsor receive credit for such costs it incurs. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Costs in connection with project completion and closeout were $12,157 Federal and $2,233 in contributed funds cost. Condition at end of fiscal year. The construction contract was awarded November 7, 1996 and was substantially complete in March 1997. The Sponsor accepted the project for operation and maintenance on November 19, 1997. 31. NEUSE RIVER BASIN, N. C. Location. Works covered by this project consist of a series of dams and reservoirs in the Neuse River Basin in North Carolina within a radius of 50 miles from Raleigh, North Carolina. (See Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1965 authorized construction of the Falls project as the key project in the recommended general plan of development of the Neuse River Basin. The plan will serve as a guide for immediate and future development of the basin's water resources as set forth in House Document 175, 89th Congress, 1st Session. A list of projects included in the general plan of development follows. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) Estimated costs as given are based on 1963 price levels, except for Falls Lake which was revised in 1989. 31A. FALLS LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is on the Neuse River about 10 miles north of the city of Raleigh, North Carolina. Existing project. The authorized project provides for an earth dam 1,915 feet long with a maximum height of 95 feet above streambed. The dam has a 30-foot top width. An uncontrolled chute spillway, 100 feet wide, is located in the east abutment. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 374,450 acre-feet, of which 243,050 acre-feet is for flood control, 45,000 acre-feet for water supply for the city of Raleigh, 61,330 acre-feet for water quality control, and 25,070 acre-feet for sediment storage. The reservoir will be operated as the initial unit of a coordinated system for control of floods in the Neuse River Basin for water supply, water quality control, recreation, and other purposes. Estimated cost of new work is $183,000,000 (1996) consisting of $91,334,000 for construction and $91,666,000 for lands and damages, including highway, railroad, and utility relocations. The project was authorized by the 1965 Flood Control Act (H.D. 175, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) 6-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Local cooperation. Local interests must prevent encroachment on downstream channels that would interfere with the operation of the reservoir; pay the United States in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, the entire amount of construction cost allocated to water supply, presently estimated at $13,637,000 and entire amount of operation, maintenance, and replacement costs allocated to water supply, presently estimated at $116,000 annually, the final amounts to be determined after actual costs are known; administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees), with interest, one-half of the separable cost of the project allocated to recreation and one-fourth of the separable cost allocated to fish and wildlife enhancement, the amount involved currently being estimated at $21,595,000, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife lands and facilities, the amount involved currently being estimated at $1,544,000 on an average annual basis. Formal assurances have been received. The N. C. Department of Natural and Economic Resources has been authorized by an act of legislation to assure payment of all non-Federal costs allocable to water supply in all Federal projects as required bylaw. The State will require repayment of water supply costs, by the users. A contract between the city of Raleigh and the United States for watersupply storage space was approved by the Secretary of the Army on September 11, 1972. A contract agreement for cost sharing of recreational lands and facilities in accordance with PL 89-72 was approved by the Secretary of the Army on September 11, 1972. A contract agreement in accordance with Section 221 of PL 91-611 was executed on October 10, 1972. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Wildlife sub-impoundments were continued at a cost of $683,861. Total Federal expenditures were $1,287,256, including the above item. Maintenance: Periodic inspections were accomplished at a cost of $5,937. Debris removal and repairs in connection with Hurricane Fran cost $7,571. A cost adjustment for sedimentation surveys resulted in a decrease of $32. Costs in connection with moving the Savannah Real Estate Office to B. Everett Jordan was $7,786. Normal operation and maintenance cost $902,604. Condition at tend of fiscal year. Reservoir filling was completed on December 7, 1983. Dedication ceremonies were held on April 30, 1983. all facilities are basically complete except for minor modifications for recreational areas. Project completion is scheduled for September 1999. 32. ROANOKE RIVER UPPER BASIN, VIRGINIA, HEADWATERS AREA Location. The project is located on the Roanoke River in the City of Roanoke, Va. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Roanoke, Va.) Existing project. The authorized plan includes about 6.2 miles of channel widening along the 10-mile project reach through the City of Roanoke, Va. Channel widening will be accomplished with the construction of a benched channel above the elevation of the average streamflow. Other flood damage reduction features include floodproofing at two locations, training walls to prevent floodwater intrusion into low areas along the river (total length 6,120 feet), replacement of two low-level bridges which constrict streamflows and a flood warning system. Recreation facilities consist of a 2.9-mile recreation trail along the project reach and access and parking areas. Approved estimated Federal cost for new work is $28,800,000. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (H.R. 6, PL 99-662). Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way including spoil disposal areas presently estimated at $8,783,000; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads and other facilities except railroad bridges, where necessary for construction of the project presently estimated at $3,004,000; pay 25 percent of the cost of flood warning system (partially offset by a credit for lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations) presently estimated at $10,000; pay 5 percent of the total cost allocated to flood control in cash in addition to all lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations presently estimated at $1,972,500, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities presently estimated at $101,000, annually; pay one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation presently estimated at $963,500, (partially offset by a credit for land, easements, rights-of-way and relocations) and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation facilities presently estimated at $9,000, annually; and pay 25 percent of the cost of non-structural floodproofing (partially offset by a credit for lands, easements, rights-ofway and relocations) presently estimated at $367,000. Fully complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design continued at a cost of $459,852. Condition at end of fiscal year. The contract for the flood warning system was completed in January 1991. The contract for the sewage treatment plant floodproofing was awarded in August 1991 and completed in February 1993. Two hazardous material sites have been cleared by the owners. Sponsor will initiate land acquisition for channel improvement in FY99. Project completion is scheduled for July 2008. 33. WRIGHTSVILIE BEACH, N. C. Location. A small island 10 miles east of Wilmington, N. C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Map p.834) Existing project. Construct a dune with a base bordering at or near the building line, with a crown width of 25 feet at elevation 15 feet above mean low water, together with integral construction of a beach berm with a crown width of 50 feet at elevation 12, extending about 14,000 feet from Moores Inlet on the north to Masonboro Inlet on the south. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H.D. 511, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized Federal participation in future nourishment for the life of the project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Future borrow site investigations cost $40,815. 6-16 WILMINGTON, N. C. , DISTRICT Between March 5 and April 29, 1998 the contract dredge R.S. Weeks removed 511,433 cubic yards from shoals to renourish Wrightsville Beach at a Federal cost of $903,987 and a contributed funds cost of $549,457. Condition at end of fiscal year. All work under the initial authorization has been completed. Under WRDA 86 the third renourishment was completed in May 1998. The next renourishment is scheduled for 2002. 34. YADKIN RIVER BASIN, N. C. AND S. C. Location. The river rises on the eastern slope of the Blue Ridge Mountains in western North Carolina, flows generally easterly about 100 miles to the vicinity of Donnaha, North Carolina, thence southeasterly 104 miles to its confluence with Uwharrie River near Badin, North Carolina, where its name changes to Great Pee Dee River. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of July 24,1946, authorized construction of four flood control dams in the Upper Yadkin River Basin, two on the Yadkin River above Wilkesboro, North Carolina, and two on Reddies River, a tributary stream. Studies made subsequent to authorization established the economic advantage of providing needed flood-control storage in only two reservoirs, one on the Reddies and one on the Yadkin. Present planning considers only the two-reservoir plan, W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir constructed 1962 and Reddies River Lake. W. Kerr Scott was transferred to the Wilmington District from Charleston in fiscal year 1980. Any future work on Reddies River will also be done by the Wilmington District. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) 34A. W. KERR SCOTT DAM AND RESERVOIR, N. C. Location. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir is on Yadkin River, North Carolina, about 6 miles upstream from Wilkesboro. At full flood-control pool elevation (1,075 feet mean sea level), the reservoir extends 15.7 miles upstream to the Wilkes-Caldwell County line. Existing project. The project consists of a rolled earthfill dam 1,740 feet long, with top of dam at elevation 1,107.5 feet mean sea level or about 148 feet above streambed elevation; a spillway near the north abutment of the dam in a rock cut with crest elevation 1,075; and outlet works consisting of an intake structure, control tower, and a circular concrete conduit 12.25 feet in diameter through the base of the dam near the south abutment. The reservoir has a gross capacity of 153,000 acre-feet of which 112,000 acre-feet are reserved for flood control, 33,000 acre-feet will be used as required for water supply, and 8,000 acre-feet being contained in the minimum pool. Estimated cost is $9,110,000 (1983) for new work. The existing project was authorized by the 1946 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. For details, see page 413 of Annual Report for 1963. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A cost adjustment for the sewer line construction resulted in a decrease of $99,643. Sewage pumphouse construction cost $50,000 at Bandits Roost and $50,000 at Warriors Creek. Engineering and design for the management center exhibits cost $59,886. Periodic inspections cost $47,930. Normal opearation and maintenance cost $1,548,044. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was commenced in August 1960 and placed in operation for flood control and water storage purposes in August 1962. 35. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation, review and inspections were made for the following projects during fiscal year 1998: Ararat River, Surry County, N.C.; Broad Creek, Beaufort County, N.C.; Core Creek, Craven County, N.C.; Deep Creek, Edgecombe County, N.C.; Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, N.C.; Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N.C.; Filberts Creek, Chowan County, N.C.; Gardners Creek, Martin County, N.C.' Genoa Sewer Facility, Wayne County, N.C.; Goldsboro, Neuse River, Wayne County, N.C..; Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N.C.; New River, Onslow County, N.C.; Old Field Swamp, Robeson County, N.C.; Pantego and Cucklers Creek, Beaufort County, N.C.; Perquimans River, Perquimans County, N.C.; Pungo Creek, Edgecombe County, N.C.; Pungo River, Edgecombe County, N.C.; Simmons Bay Creek, Columbus County, N.C.; South Creek, Beaufort, N.C.; South Mayo River, Patrick County, Va.; Swift Creek, Pitt and Craven Counties, N.C.; and White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, N.C. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation on local flood protection works where appropriate. Cost for the period was $7,096. Total cost to September 30, 1998, was $538,338, charged to operations. 36. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 6-K.) Emergency flood control activities and hurricane flood and shore-protection activities at Federally authorized projects (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Catastrophic Disaster Preparedness Program cost $43,662. Disaster Preparedness Program cost $295,046. Non-reimbursable costs in connection with Hurricane Bertha were $755; Hurricane Fran $68,899; Hurricane Bonnie $86,711; Hurricane Gordon $310 and Hurricane George $7,403. Cost in connection with the February 1998 winter storm was $14,366. Cost in connection with the emergency water contracting initiative was $24,977. 6-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 37. ROANOKE RIVER BASIN, VA. AND N. C. Location. The project is on the Roanoke River and its tributaries in Virginia and North Carolina within a radius of 100 miles from Danville, Virginia. Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1944 approved a general plan for the comprehensive development of the Roanoke River Basin for flood control and other purposes, and authorized construction of John H. Kerr and Philpott Reservoirs. (See Table 6-J for a list of dams and reservoirs included in the comprehensive plan.) Local cooperation. None required. John H. Kerr and Philpott Reservoirs are the only projects in the comprehensive plan that have been authorized for construction. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) 37A. JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA. AND N. C. Location. The project is on Roanoke River, about 178.7 river miles above its mouth, in Mecklenburg County, Virginia, and 20.3 miles downstream from Clarksville, Virginia. The reservoir extends upstream on Roanoke River 56 miles and on Dan River 34 miles. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete gravity dam with wing and saddle dikes on the right and left banks, with a total length of about 22,285 feet. The reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated system of reservoirs in the Roanoke River Basin for control of floods, generation of hydroelectric power, regulation of low-water flow, and for other purposes. The power installation is 204,000 kilowatts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) The existing project was authorized by the 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Upgrading the SCADA system at the powerhouse cost $89,359. Sedimentation survey cost $6,046. Hurricane Fran repairs cost $107,692. Replacing the raw water valve at the powerhouse cost $71,079. Replacing the washhouse at North Bend park cost $227,101. Cemetery relocations cost $31,898. Upgrading the station service generator cost $107,761. Design of the Resource Management Office addition cost $50,854. Historic sites survey cost $40,219. Engineering and design for the Island Creek pumping plant rehabilitation and replacement cost $167,716. Preliminary assessment and delineation of DDT and Dioxin sites cost $7,774. Preparation and update of Water Control Plan and Reservoir Regulation Manual cost $48,747. Earth dike modifications were completed at a cost of $121,323. Rehabilitation study of 7 main units in the powerhouse cost $20,992. Highway 58 recreation mitigation cost $784 in Federal funds and $57,847 in contributed fiunds. Periodic inspections cost $97,846. Normal operation and maintenance cost $6,605,659. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for additional recreational facilities. Production of power and protection from floods are provided by project. 37B. PHILPOTT LAKE, VA. Location. The project is located on Smith River, Virginia, 44.3 miles above its junction with Dan River, and 35 miles upstream from Virginia-North Carolina State line in Franklin and Henry Counties. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete gravity dam 892 feet long and with a maximum height of 220 feet. Reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for flood control in the Roanoke River Basin, generation of hydroelectric power, regulation of low-water flow, and for other purposes. The powerhouse has a total installation of 14,000 kilowatts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.). Existing project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Upgrading the SCADA system at the powerhouse cost $1,852. Hurricane Fran repairs cost $5,079. Replacing the boathouse cost $7,649. Construction of a vault toilet at Philpott Park cost $24,900. Cost adjustments resulted in a decrease of $478 for investigation of unit 1, a decrease of $8,318 for the powerhouse rehabilitation report and a decrease of $3,578 for sedimentation surveys. Periodic inspections cost $46,817. Normal operation and maintenance cost $1,997,496. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for additional recreational facilities, and is providing power and flood protection. 38. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, located in the Cape Fear River Basin, North Carolina, began Fiscal Year 1998 at elevation 214.61 feet, m.s.l. or 1.39 feet below guide curve. The lake level remained near elevation 214.0 feet, m.s.l. through mid-November. Jordan Lake returned to the guide curve level of 216 feet, m.s.l. on 26 November and remained near guide curve until late December. From late December through March several rainfall events attributed to the 'El Nino' weather pattern caused several peaks at Jordan Lake. The highest crest occured on 22 March at elevation 230.35 feet, m.s.l. or 14.35 feet above guide curve. This was the maximum elevation for the fiscal year. The lake returned to near guide curve elevation in early April. During April and May, two minor rain events caused the lake to rise to elevation 220.15 and 218.80 feet, m.s.I., respectively, before returning to near guide curve in early June. Jordan Lake level gradually fell below guide curve on 4 July. The dry weather patterns attributed to 'La. Nina' caused Jordan Lake to continue dropping to the lowest level for the fiscal year on 30 September at 213.17 feet, m.s.l. or 2.83 feet below guide curve. Jordan Lake ended the fiscal year at 213.21 feet, m.s.l. or 2.79 feet below guide curve. Maximum flood pool storage utilized during the fiscal year was 50.0 percent and conservation pool storage remaining at the minimum elevation was 73.7 percent. Flood damages prevented during Fiscal Year 1998 were $29,139,000 making the cumulative total since inception of the project in 1981 $193,473,300. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $88,814. 6-18 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT Falls Lake, located in the Neuse River Basin, North Carolina, began Fiscal Year 1998 at elevation 248.99 feet, m.s.I., or 2.01 feet below a falling guide curve. Below average inflows through mid-November caused the lake elevation to fall to 248.05 feet, m.s.l. or 2.05 feet below guide curve on II November. This was the minimum lake elevation for the fiscal year. Falls Lake remained near elevation 249.0 feet, m.s.l. until the third week in December. For the next three months, 'El Nino' induced storms caused the lake level to rise to guide curve during the first week in January. Falls Lake continued to rise and fall with each rainfall event. During one of the events, the maximum elevation for the fiscal year of 263.72 feet, m.s.l. or 13.62 feet above guide curve was reached on 20 March. This was also the all time maximum level of Falls Lake since filling in 1983 and also was only 1. 1 feet below the spillway crest level. The level of Falls Lake receded and returned to the guide curve elevation by the end of April. The lake level then remained near the guide curve elevation of 251.0 feet, m.s.l. through the end of June. Due to 'La Nina' induced drought conditions, Falls Lake level continued to fall, ending the fiscal year at 248.40 feet, m.s.l. or 2.60 feet below guide curve. The maximum flood pool storage utilized during the year was 87 percent, and the minimum conservation pool storage remaining was 67 percent. Flood damages prevented during Fiscal Year 1998 were $70,656,100 making the cumulative total since inception of the project in 1983 $399,250,400. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $96,302. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, located in the Roanoke River Basin, Virginia and North Carolina, began Fiscal Year 1998 at elevation 297.25 feet, mean sea level (m.s.l.) or 2.25 feet below guide curve. This low starting elevation was a continuation of the low inflow from the previous fiscal year. Due to above normal rainfall in October, the reservoir level rose to slightly above a declining guide curve by the end of October and continued above guide curve through November. Below normal rainfall in November and December dropped the reservoir level to the minimum elevation of the fiscal year at 294.88 feet, m.s.l. or 0.62 feet below guide curve on 19 December. Rainfall during the latter part of December brought the reservoir level to slightly above the guide curve elevation. As predicted by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), heavy rains produced from the weather phenomena 'El Nino' began to appear in the southeastern United States the first week of January. This resulted in heavy rains during the first quarter of 1998 which kept the reservoir above guide curve until the end ofMay. Rainfall events began to occur in January and typically reoccurred weekly. The month of January recorded the heaviest rainfall average above Kerr Dam since records began in 189 1. Consequently, heavy inflows of 110 percent above normal gradually drove Kerr Reservoir level to 308.73 feet, m.s.l. or 13.23 feet above guide curve at the end of January. Total average rainfall during the month of February was the fifth heaviest amount to occur since 1891. Consequently, heavy inflows of 140 percent above normal caused Kerr Reservoir to rise to the maximum level of the fiscal year at 315.73 feet, m.s.1. or 20.23 feet above guide curve on 20 February. As a sidenote, Island Creek Pump Station, a subimpoundment of Kerr Reservoir peaked at 282.2 feet, m.s.l. or 24.2 feet above normal on 21 February. This was the highest level for Island Creek since inception of the project in the early 1950's. Island Creek is operated to maintain a normal level of 258.0 feet, m.s.l. Combined, the first two months of the year marked the wettest January and February on record for the upper Roanoke River Basin. The first part of March was relatively drier. As a result, the reservoir level dropped to near 307 feet, m.s.l. by mid-March. Another heavy rainfall event then occurred which quickly drove the reservoir level to 315.34 feet, m.s.l. or 15.58 feet above a rising guide curve on 24 March. These first three months of 1998 marked the wettest January, February and March on record for the upper Roanoke River Basin. In April, the heavy rainfall events began to subside. A relatively dry period during the beginning of April slowly dropped the reservoir level to near 305.5 feet, m.s.l. on 16 April. At this time, another heavy rainfall occurred to drive the reservoir level to 311.01 feet, m.s.l. or 9.01 feet above guide curve on 24 April. The reservoir level slowly descended to near 307.5 feet, m.s.l. on 7 May. Another rainfall event then pushed the level back to 309.77 feet, m.s.l. or 7.77 feet above guide curve on 11 May. Drier conditions induced by the 'La Nina' phenomena helped the reservoir level descend to guide curve on I June. From the beginning of June to the end of the fiscal year, the reservoir level was below guide curve. A strong 'La Nina' effect caused the upper Roanoke Basin to experience a mild drought for this period. John H. Kerr Reservoir ended the fiscal year at elevation 294.93 feet, m.s.l. or 4.57 feet below guide curve. Maximum flood pool storage utilized during the year was 73 percent. The contractual power pool storage remaining at the lowest elevation during the year was 78 percent. Gross generation for the fiscal year amounted to 645,934,900 kilowatt-hours or 51 percent above normal and net marketed power revenue was $7,840,344 making a cumulative total of $194,411,719 since inception of the project in 1952. Annual flood damages prevented during Fiscal Year 1998 were $4,702,600 making a cumulative total of $385,638,400 since 1952. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $338,836. Philpott Lake, located on the Smith River in the Dan River Basin, Virginia, began Fiscal Year 1998 at elevation 967.80 feet, m.s.l. or 3.70 feet below the guide curve. The level of Philpott Lake continued to drop into December due to well below average inflows, which resulted in the minimum elevation for Fiscal Year 1998 at 964.62 feet, m.s.l. on 19 December. Above normal rainfall which occurred during the months of December through June, was attributed to the 'EI Nino' weather pattern. The heaviest monthly total rainfall for the fiscal year of 10.95 inches in January produced above normal inflows. These flows pushed Philpott Lake 1.85 feet above guide curve to peak at 975.35 feet, m.s.l. on 20 April. This was the maximum elevation for the fiscal year. Philpott Lake fluctuated near guide curve through June. Once the lake level dropped below guide curve in July it continued a steady decline through the remainder of the fiscal year. Philpott Lake ended the fiscal year at elevation 967.71 feet, m.s.l. or 3.79 feet below guide curve. The maximum flood pool storage utilized during the fiscal year was 27 6-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 percent. The contractual power pool storage remaining at the lowest elevation during the year was 77 percent. Gross generation for the fiscal year amounted to 29,275,433 kilowatt hours or 12 percent above normal and net marketed power revenue was $656,475 making a cumulative total since inception of the project in 1953 of $27,394,653. Flood damages prevented during Fiscal Year 1998 were $6,773,700 making the cumulative total $346,205,000. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $118,112. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, located in the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin, North Carolina, began Fiscal Year 1998 at elevation 1030.17 feet, m.s.l., or 0. 17 feet above the guide curve elevation of 1030.00 feet, m.s.l. Drier conditions in early October resulted in an elevation drop to 1029.20 feet, m.s.l. or 0.80 feet below guide curve on 24 October. W. Kerr Scott Reservoir returned to guide curve on 27 October and remained at or near that level through early January. Above normal rainfall occurred from January through May. Several storm events caused significant rises in the reservoir level to elevation 1038.66, 1036.05, 1038.60, 1037.18, and 1035.75 feet, m.s.l. on 9 January, 28 January, 5 February, 18 February and 10 March, respectively. A storm in mid-April drove W. Kerr Scott Reservoir to its highest level for the fiscal year at elevation 1045.94 feet, m.s.l. or 15.94 feet above guide curve on 20 April. The reservoir level rose above guide curve again on 9 May to elevation 1032.79 feet, m.s.l. After recovering from this event, the reservoir level stayed within one foot of the guide curve elevation through August. With less than half of the normal precipitation for the months of August and September, W. Kerr Scott Reservoir fell below guide curve on 28 August and continued to fall. W. Kerr Scott ended the fiscal year at the lowest level for the year at 1028.58 feet, m.s.l. or 1.42 feet below guidecurve. Maximum flood pool storage utilized during the fiscal year was 15.3 percent, and the conservation pool storage remaining was 96.9 percent at the minimum elevation. Flood damages prevented during Fiscal Year 1998 were $9,488,500 raising the cumulative total since inception of the project in 1963 to $163,717,800. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $72,182. Miscellaneous 39. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT CAPE FEAR LOCK AND DAM NO. 1 FISH LADDER, N.C. Location. The project is located at Lock and Dam No. 1 on the Cape Fear River in Bladen County, North Carolina, 39 miles upstream (northwest) of Wilmington, N.C.) (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Kelly, N.C.) Existing project. The project includes the installation of a prefabricated fish ladder that would provide for passage of anadromous shad and river herring. The project will restore access by these species to 33 miles of high quality spawning habitat in the Cape Fear River above Lock and Dam No. 1. It is anticipated that this project will have a life of 10 to 15 years. This ladder is not expected to pass sturgeon or striped bass; therefore, future studies and projects are needed to provide a comprehensive fish passage solution that addresses all affected species. The fish ladder was attached to the existing lock and dam structure. Approved estimated Federal cost for construction implementation is $78,000 (1998). The project was approved by the Division Commander on April 24, 1996, under Section 1135, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended. Local Cooperation. The sponsor shall contribute 25 percent of total project modification costs which includes implementation of the authorized improvements as well as planning, engineering, design, supervision and administration, monitoring, and other activities associated with implementation, but does not include the implementation of betterments. The non-federal contribution will be credit for in-kind work, consisting of monitoring the operation and effectiveness of the fish ladder over two spawning seasons. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Continuing installatino of fish ladder and monitoring at a cost of $10,247. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in May 1996 with completion scheduled for May 1999. Monitoring is continuing. 6-20 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT General Investigations 40. SURVEYS Cost for the period was $749,005 of which $19,247 was for navigation studies, $5,783 was for flood control studies, $378,973 for shoreline protection studies, $68 for environmental service partnerships, $43,454 for watershed/ ecosystem studies, $15,702 for review of completed projects, $59,920 for Special Investigations, $1,571 for FERC licenses review, $18,309 for interagency water resources development, $2,980 for National Estuary studies, $2,220 for the North American Waterfowl Management Plan, $1,961 for cooperation with other Water Resource Agencies, and $198,817 for cooperation with states. Contributed funds in the amount of $19,247 were expended for navigation studies, $390,830 for shoreline protection studies and $109,403 for cooperation with states. 41. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain information studies, as authorized by Section 206, 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended, comprise compilation and dissemination, upon the request of a State or a political subdivision thereof, of information on floods and flood damages, including identification of areas subject to inundation by floods of various magnitudes and frequencies, and general criteria for guidance of Federal and non-Federal interests and agencies in the use of flood plain areas; and provide advice to other Federal agencies and local interests for their use in planning to ameliorate the flood hazard. Total costs for the period were $349,831. Total costs to September 30, 1998 were $7,379,056. 42. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Preconstruction engineering and design (PED) for Wilmington Harbor, Northeast Cape Fear River, N. C., was completed at a cost of $59,069. PED was continued on Brunswick County Beaches, N. C., at a cost of $785,332. PED was accomplished on Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N.C., at a cost of $6,752. PED was completed on Wilmington Harbor channel widening, N.C., at a cost of $62,663. PED was completed on Cape Fear-Northeast Cape Fear River, N.C. at a cost of $418,475. 6-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 6-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total cost to in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sept. 30, 1998 1. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2. Atlantic Beach Channels, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va. & St. John River, Fla. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Avon Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Beaufort Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 6. Belhaven Harbor, N.C. 7. Cape Fear River, N.C. above Wilmington New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 60,000 89,091 3,079,000 3,255,406 5,951,622 6,189,726 8,358 8,358 40,000 31,282 6,804,000 6,406,295 10,288 960,400 -1,008 955,254 - 31,809 - 31,8091 - 18,501 - 18,501 221,744 -9,874 433,289 211,870 433,289 - - 10,600 - - 10,6002 3,101,000 4,337,000 75,766,4733 3,494,326 4,244,622 75,552,0283 15,142,622 11,279,997 12,509,024 177,531,7144 13,591,014 12,751,096 12,579,027 177,481,6094 - - - 86,851 - - - 86,8515 - - - 667,300 - - - 667,300 - - - 74,096 - - - 74,096 - 22,710 7,138 407,984 - 22,116 7,732 407,984 - - - 74,986 - - - 74,986 - - - 818,0406 - - - 818,0406 239,071 211,280 -27,433 4,040,0047 358 4,040,0047 - 34,000 - 34,000 - 326,225 - 326,225 - 126,687 126,687 46,300 40,369 722,313 714,506 537,500 415,067 352,824 358,739 598,000 720,785 -2,350 773,175 -2,334 773,175 - 3,759,5738 - 3,759,5738 441,793 22,458,4439 448,671 22,449,8279 6-22 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total cost to in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sept. 30, 1998 8. Channel from Pamlico Sound to Rodanthe, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 9. Drum Inlet, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 10. Far Creek, N.C. 11. Lockwoods Folly River, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 12. Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 13. Morehead City Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 14. Neuse River, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 730 730 54,153 54,468 - 826,416 - 737,223 - 106,000 - 104,005 98,063 72,055 1,878,996 1,905,465 23,907 23,734 319,399 319,399 175,000 199,448 5,178,676 5,171,301 281,888 329,610 6,745,000 6,648,791 5,413,000 5,555,166 2,516,000 2,731,996 34,000 374,482 6,102 6,102 659,626 658,727 432,631 433,480 -88,27! 91' -1,99 - 42,029 - 42,029 67 744,555 744,555 5 104,005 - 104,005 - 152,619 - 152,619 390,871 3,719,862 380,095 3,709,036 - 13,500 - 13,500 - 164,642 - 164,642 7,074 1,805,197 7,246 1,305,197 - 241,27210 - 241,27211 235,007 10,875,456 235,057 10,875,456 - 92,650 - 92,65012 670,570 -200,000 330,000 9,657,51513 96,225 330,201 397,219 9,633,54513 3,351,600 3,392,000 3,120,646 90,369,738 3,309,608 3,382,956 2,813,750 89,932,065 - 79,000 -4,000 2,569,368 399 75,000 - 2,564,745 -176,346 - - 13,204,70714 - - - 13,204,70714 2,346,400 6,769,505 2,535,716 71,533,03015 2,313,104 3,918,162 5,396,328 71,492,54215 -155 - - 2,731,996 - - - 2,731,996 -57,518 2,740 2,740 5,900 2,519 1,141 1,141 52,100 1,807,812 47,998 1,798,329 - 465,223 - 465,223 6,348 336,438 6,348 336,438 - 12,00016 - 12,00016 6-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total cost to in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sept. 30,1998 15. Ocracoke Inlet, N.C. 16. Pamlico and Taf River, N.C. 17. Roanoke River, N.C. 18. Rollinson Channel, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 19. Shallotte River, N.C. 20. Silver Lake Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 21. Waterway connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 22. Wilmington Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost 132,345 132,345 - - 346,240 - - 346,240 555 1,973 948,638 555 1,973 948,638 - - 674,651 - - 674,651 - 17,930 1,219,480 - 17,930 1,219,480 4,039 4,039 26,827 26,827 153,524 153,748 23,649 23,430 7,333,000 4,288,343 7,291,556 7,347,825 1,050,000 1,579,539 249,225 291,061 2,684 2,684 49,964 49,964 14,492 12,711 416,82 352,67 716,70 701,70 565,25 566,25 17,00 14,80 404,584 404,584 708,048 708,048 589,105 589,105 1 -60,036 2,307,903 6 4,109 2,307,903 - - 41,142 - - 41,142 - - 18,181 - - 18,181 - 11,532 568,203 - 11,532 568,203 - - 184,284 - - 184,284 8 173,864 8,783,134 5 188,867 8,783,134 - - 75,000 - - 75,000 77 00 -240,000 5,400,000 5,580,951 5,896,574 7,485,260 8,225,500 7,545,033 8,197,479 3,000,000 2,400,000 1,928,385 2,557,591 749,000 1,238,885 459,589 1,261,682 6-24 9,005 10,005 -2,200 4,465,000 3,908,876 6,008,493 5,648,322 3,160,000 3,589,853 1,123,224 583,347 502,567 502,567 4,088,036 4,088,036 17,252 17,252 40,939,22617 40,243,59517 117,132,77618 116,544,70818 10,960,000 10,438,990 10,411,31919 9,604,68619 WILMINGTON, N. C. , DISTRICT TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total cost to in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sept. 30, 1998 23A. B. Everett Jordon New Work: Dam and Lake, N.C. Approp. (Regular Funds) Cost Maint: Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 24. Carolina Beach and New Work: Vicinity, N.C. Approp. (Regular Funds) Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 25. Clinton Wastewater New Work: Treatment Plant, Approp. Clinton, N.C. Cost 26. Danville (Southside Waste- New Work: water Treatment Plant), Va. Approp. (Regular Funds) Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 27. Hamlet City New Work: Lake, N.C. Approp. (Regular Funds) Cost Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 28. King (Waterplant), N.C. New Work: (Regular Funds) Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 29. Moravian Creek, New Work: Wilkesboro, N.C. Aprop. Cost 30. N.C. Aquarium, New Work: Dare County, N.C. Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 31A. Falls Lake, N.C. New Work: (Regular Funds) Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 32. Roanoke River Upper Basin New Work: Va. - Headwaters Area Approp. (Regular Funds) Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 75,346 720,000 933,105 696,590 1,067,000 1,082,000 1,100,006 1,098,274 1,251,300 1,282,395 1,318,000 1,249,813 615,000 995,559 1,569,000 1,634,012 149,297,287 149,049,364 17,417,64320 17,381,46621 1,764,735 1,764,735 2,760,000 2,200,009 1,239,973 1,239,973 75,000 70,987 19,000 17,806 137,982 43,200 42,439 57,800 5,000 13,311 40,000 25,637 270,000 378,329 968,000 61,000 27,117 17,000 14,706 139,162 105,780 8,184 20,000 11,272 21,000 24,723 191,000 1,205,000 850,000 2,244,996 1,213,742 1,015,000 1,069,700 1,057,765 986,137 251,268 115,321 -14,000 27,192 77,976 109,000 98,535 2,497,000 2,671,349 3,917,000 1,801,647 10,000 41,023 130,000 120,947 50,000 33,091 6,197,000 6,200,059 1,437,000 4,113,983 14,000 21,990 8,575 13,396 51,062 1,487,329 - 304,035 - 280,000 26,000 121,424 53,495 55,000 26,257 424,000 422,483 75,000 205,767 973,000 386,428 1,132,000 1,221,861 -1,081 258,000 176,148 7,979 -7,553 -3,248 15,000 45,357 12,157 -58,000 2,233 850,000 1,287,256 983,000 923,866 23,930,533 23,599,392 15,487,07022 15,080,70022 656,00023 642,35924 232,00025 227,99526 50,000 46,487 3,155,000 2,637,225 304,035 280,000 219,98027 219,98028 50,247 50,247 218,00029 210,47430 500,00031 500,00032 208,000 208,000 183,472,996 182,670,060 16,942,26120 16,862,26521 - 251,268 - 192,216 591,000 3,139,000 459,852 2,882,123 626,586 580,855 6-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total cost to in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sept. 30, 1998 33. Wrightsville Beach, New Work: N.C. Approp. -106,000 - 75,000 1,005,000 4,609,100 (Regular Funds) Cost 39,617 23,320 70,572 944,802 4,501,451 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. - - - 630,204 3,250,93333 Cost - - - 549,457 3,170,18633 34A. W. Kerr Scott Dam New Work: and Reservoir, N.C. Approp. - - - - 8,841,326 Cost - - - - 8,841,326 Maint: Approp. 2,011,000 4,111,000 2,481,000 1,581,000 35,445,90434 Cost 2,145,775 3,921,864 2,673,202 1,656,217 35,372,54635 37A. John H. Kerr Dam New Work: and Reservoir, Va. & N.C. Aprop. - - - - 94,402,927 (Regular Funds) Cost - - - - 94,402,927 Maint: Approp. 7,057,099 7,648,000 11,397,500 7,056,000 143,626,18836 Cost 7,296,963 7,582,398 10,863,691 7,802,850 143,121,57337 (Contributed Funds) Maint: Contrib. - - - 383,657 390,657 Cost - - - 57,847 64,847 37B. Philpott Lake, Va. New Work: Approp. - - - - 14,796,384 Cost - - - - 14,796,384 Maint: Approp. 1,977,000 2,014,100 2,855,000 2,089,000 43,094,5963s Cost 2,056,683 1,983,736 2,934,811 2,071,419 42,998,97239 39. Cape Fear Lock &, New Work: Dam No. 1 Fish Approp. - 63,000 7,000 - 70,00040 Ladder, N.C. Cost - 11,301 32,557 10,247 54,10541 1. Includes $2,369 refund to local interests in FY 82. 2. Includes $2,055 refund to local interests. 3. Includes $198,707 for previous projects. 4. Includes $107,634 for previous projects. 5. Includes $13,934 refund to local interests. 6. Includes $25,000 for previous projects. 7. Includes $12,854 for previous projects. 8. Includes $149,119 for previous projects. 9. Includes $8,178 for previous projects. 10. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 64, $3,000; FY 65, -$2,755; FY 71, $8,000; FY 72, $2,000; FY 74, $9,000; FY 75, $25,000; FY 76 & 76T, $20,000; FY 77, $2,500; FY 78, $8,800; FY 79, $3,000; FY 81, $1,680; and preconstruction planning finds: FY 80, $15,000 and FY 81, $19,320. 11. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 64, $219; FY 65, $26; FY 71, $8,000; FY 72, $1,448; FY 73, $552; FY 74, $9,000; FY 75, $11,925; FY 76 & 76T, $27,977; FY 77, $7,598; FY 78, $7,449; FY 79, $4,351; FY 81, $1,680; and preconstruction planning costs: FY 80, $5,686 and FY 81, $1,471. 12. Includes $69,145 refund to local interests. 13. Adjusted by $6,361 to reflect actual costs. 14. Includes $44,484 for previous projects. 15. Includes $284,557 for previous projects. 16. Includes $1,959 refund to local interests on Dawson Creek, NC. 17. Includes $4,625,614 for new work on previous projects. 18. Includes $602,614 for previous projects. 19. Includes refunds to local interests: FY 78, $92,374; FY 79, $8,000; FY 80, $14,007; FY 81, $1,847; Fy 82, $2,823; FY 85, $60,000. 6-26 WILMINGTON, N. C. , DISTRICT TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 20. Includes maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, $153,900. 21. Includes maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, $153,900. 22. Includes refunds to local interests: FY 83, $400,000; FY 84, $128,345; FY 85, $82,600. 23. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 82, $10,000; FY 83, $85,000; FY 84, $70,000; FY 85, $35,000; FY 86, $45,000; FY 87, $30,000; FY 88, $1,000; FY 89, $55,000; FY 90, $85,000; FY 92, $39,483 and preconstruction planning funds: FY92, $517; FY 94, $40,000; FY 95 $75,000; FY 96, $61,000; FY 97, $10,000 and FY 98, $14,000. 24. Includes preauthorzation study costs: FY 82, $4,828; FY 83, $76,218; FY 84, $61,709; FY 85, $41,994; FY 86, $36,550; FY 87, $49,888; FY 88, $3,562; FY 89, $30,816; FY 90, $32,657; FY91, $63,108; FY 92, $50,468; FY 93, $3,024; FY 94, $662 and preconstruction planning costs: FY 94, $25,758; FY 95 $70,987; FY 96, $27,117; FY 97, $41,023 and FY 98, $21,990. 25. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 91, $40,000; FY 93, $591; and preconstruction planning and construction funds: FY93, $24,409; FY 94, $1,000 and FY 95, $19,000. 26. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 91, $5,385; FY 92, $27,643; FY 93, $7,563; and preconstruction planning and construction costs: FY 93, $725; FY 94, $24,646 and FY 95, $17,806. 27. Includes funds for first $40,000 of combined planning and design analysis at all Federal cost as follows: FY 93, $25,000 and FY 94, $15,000 and preconstruction planning and design analysis funds: FY 94, $5,000. 28. Includes costs for first $40,000 of combined planning and design phase at all Federal cost as follows: FY 93, $20,077 and FY 94, $19,877. 29. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 91, $70,000; FY 92, $15,000; FY 93, $3,000; FY 94, $35,000; FY 95, $4,543 and preconstruction planning funds: FY 95, $457; FY 96, $20,000; FY 97, $55,000; and FY 98, $15,000. 30. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 91, $12,573; FY 92, $69,544; FY 93, $57; FY 94, $32,103; FY 95, $13,311; FY 96, -$45 and preconstruction planning costs: FY 96, $11,317; FY 97, $26,257; and FY 98, $45,357. 31. Includes funds for first $40,000 of combined planning and design analysis at all Federal cost as follows: FY 93, $10,000; FY 94, $5,000; FY95, $25,000 and preconstruction planning and design analysis funds: FY 95, $15,000. 32. Includes costs for first $40,000 of conbined planning and design analysis at all Federal cost as follows: FY 93, $5,601; FY 94, $9,399; FY95, $25,000 and preconstruction planning and design analysis costs: FY 95, $637. 33. Includes $61,585 refund to local interests. 34. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 74, $4,000; FY 75, $5,500; FY 76 & 76 T, $3,600; FY 77, $5,800; FY 78, $7,200; FY 79, $8,000; FY 80, $10,000; FY 81, $10,000; FY 82, $11,040; FY 83, $7,000; FY 84, $9,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,200; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, $153,900. 35. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 74, $4,000; FY 75, $4,400; FY 76 & 76T, $4,666; FY 77, $5,193; FY 78, $6,824; FY 79, $7,506; FY 80, $11,312; FY 81, $9,688; FY 82, $9,727; FY 83, $7,000; FY 84, $8,444; FY 85, $2,379; and maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,200; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, $153,900. 36. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 74, $35,000; FY 76 & 76T, $48,000; FY 77, $51,400; FY 78, $115,100; FY 79, $63,000; FY 80, $60,000; FY 81, $80,000; FY 82, $67,160; FY 83, $77,759; FY 84, $73,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 79, $167,646; FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, $153,900. 37. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 75, $35,000; FY 76 & 76T, $13,606; FY 77, $85,692; FY 78, $114,604; FY 79, $1,120; FY 80, $118,718; FY 81, $83,760; FY 82, $67,160; FY 83, $77,759; FY 84, $67,850; FY 85, $5,149; and maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 79, $167,350; FY 80, $296; FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, $153,900. 38. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 75, $47,000; FY 78, $40,400; FY 79, $22,000; FY 80, $25,000; FY 81, $20,000; FY 82, $20,240; FY 83, $21,000; FY 84, $19,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, $153,900. 39. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 75, $13,741; FY 76 & 76T, $31,666; FY 77, $1,593; FY 78, $39,771; FY 79, $22,629; FY 80, $24,619; FY 81, $20,381; FY 82, $20,240; FY 83, $21,000; FY 84, $19,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, $153,900. 40. Includes planning and design analysis funds: FY 96, $20,000; and construction implementation funds: FY 96, $43,000. 41. Includes planning and design analysis cost: FY 96, $9,296; and construction implementation cost: FY 96, $2,005. 6-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 6-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Project and Work Authorized Documents July 25, 1912 July 25, 1912 August 8, 1917 July 18, 1918 January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 March 4,19332 June 26, 19343 August 26, 1937 August 26, 1937 June 20, 1938 June 20, 1938 March 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 September 3, 1954 November 29, 1963, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 April 7, 1966, .Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., and ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (See Section 3 of text) Original route of the Norfolk-Beaufort Inlet section. Purchase of canal. Change in route; following changes approved by Secretary of War, April 14, 1919: Albemarle Sound-Pamlico Sound section: Changed from "Alligator River-Rose Bay route" to "Alligator River- Pungo River route." Pamlico Sound-Neuse River section: Changed from "Pamlico Sound-Brant Shoal Neuse River route" to "Goose Creek-Bay River route." Alligator River-Pungo route (proposed land cut connecting the rivers): Changed from a straight line to a bent line approaching nearer town of Fairfield, N. C. A 12-foot channel 90 feet wide from Beaufort to Cape Fear River, N. C., including highway bridge and tidal lock.4 An 8-foot channel 75 feet wide from Cape Fear River to Winyah Bay, S. C. Construct a suitable bridge near Fairfield, N. C. Operating and care of works of improvements provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Increasing dimensions of waterway to 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide. A 12-foot side channel 90 feet wide to Swansboro. A yacht basin near Southport, 12 feet deep, 230 feet wide, and 450 feet long, with connecting channel. A 6-foot channel 90 feet wide from New River Inlet to Inland Waterway. Six mooring basins. 5 A 12-foot channel in New River. 6, 11 Vicinity of Fairfield - drainage. Masonboro Inlet and connecting channels, including jetties at the inlet.7 A 12-foot channel and basin in Peltier Creek 8 A 6-foot channel 90 feet wide from Intracoastal Waterway to Bogue Inlet gorge. An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide through New Topsail Inlet, thence a 7-foot channel 80 feet wide to Intracoastal Waterway by way of Old Topsail Creek; and a 7-foot channel 80 feet wide in Banks Channel from New Topsail Inlet, paralleling barrier beach, to Intracoastal Waterway. H.D. 391, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H.D.589, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H.D. 1478,63d Cong., 3d sess. and H. D. 1136, 64th Cong., 1st sess.' Approved by Secretary of War, May 15, 1919. H.D. 450,69th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 41, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 6, 75th Cong., I1st sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 16, 75th Cong., 1st sess.' H.D. 549, 75th Cong., 3d sess. ' H.D. 691, 75th Cong., 3d sess.' H.D. 660, 76th Cong., 3d sess.' H.D. 421, 80th Cong., 1st sess.' H.D. 723, 80th Cong., 2d sess. 1 H.D. 341, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' H.D. 379, 81st Cong., 1st sess. 1 Detailed Project Report April 1963. Detailed Project Report July 1965 6-28 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Project and Work Authorized Documents November 7, 1966 November 7, 1966 December 31, 1970 October 22, 1976 August 13, 1968 February 18, 1982, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 September 7, 1983, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 November 17, 1986 March 3, 1881 March 2, 1907 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 May 21, 1965, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 August 12, 1983 Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 July 3, 1930 Maintenance of a channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 8,000 feet long, from the through channel of the waterway to and including a basin of the same depth, 130 feet wide and 180 feet long at Carolina Beach. Maintenance of general navigation features of N.C. State Ports Authority Small Boat Harbor at Southport. Replacement of Federally-owned and operated highway bridges at Coinjock, Fairfield, Wilkerson Creek, Hobucken and Core Creek. Modification of terms of local cooperation to allow for full Federal funding of Wilkerson Creek and Coinjock Bridges. Mitigation of damages caused by north jetty at Masonboro Inlet. An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide through Carolina Beach Inlet to the Intracoastal Waterway. An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide from the gorge in Bogue Inlet through the ocean bar. Modification of terms of local cooperation to allow for full Federal funding of Core Creek, Hobucken and Fairfield Bridges. BEAUFORT HARBOR, N.C. (See Section 5 of text) A 9-foot channel 200 feet wide through Bulkhead Channel to Beaufort; a 6-foot channel 100 feet wide to North River and Core Sound; and construct jetties on Shackleford Point. Repairs to Fort Macon jetties and additional jetties and shore protection. Bulkhead across Bird Shoal. Increase in depth to 12 feet in Bulkhead Channel, Gallants Channel, and in front of Beaufort. Increase in width and length of basin in front of Beaufort, all to 12 feet deep. Increase in depth to 12 feet and in width to 100 feet in Taylors Creek; transfer to Beaufort Harbor project. Channels 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide in Bulkhead, Gallants and Taylors Creek channels, and through turning basin in front of Beaufort; and harbor of refuge in Town Creek, 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide and 900 feet long connected to Gallants Channel by channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 1,400 feet long. A channel 14 feet deep, 70 feet wide, and 1,900 feet long, from Bulkhead Channel to a turning basin 14 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 300 feet long near the upper end of Morgan Creek. SILVER LAKE HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 20 of text) Entrance channel, 5 feet deep and 50 feet wide, from Pamlico Sound to the 3-foot contour in the lake, and training wall at entrance. H.D. 515, 89th Cong., 2d sess. 1 H.D. 514, 89th Cong., 2d sess.' H.D. 142, 92nd Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 597, 94th Cong., 2d sess. Approved by OCE Oct. 2, 1980 Detailed Project Report June 1980 Detailed Project Report May 1983 Annual Report, 1881, p.1013 Specified in act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 68th Cong., 2d sess.' H.D. 776, 69th Cong., 2nd sess.' H.D. 334, 76th Cong., 2nd sess.' H.D. 111, 81st Cong., 2nd sess.' Detailed Project Report April 1965 Detailed Project Report June 1983 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 70th Cong., 1st sess. 6-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 6-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Project and Work Authorized Documents October 17, 1940 February 7, 1967, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 August 30, 19359 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 July 11, 1963, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 September 22, 1967, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 February 17, 1969, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 April 3, 1975, Sec. 107 July 14, 196010 Channel, 10 feet deep, and anchorage basin of same depth, 100 feet wide across Big Foot Slough and 60 feet wide in entrance. Basin depth of 12 feet in Silver Lake harbor; channels 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide, in Teaches Hole and Big Foot Slough Channels and across Bluff Shoal; entrance channel, same depth, 60 feet wide; and training wall on south side of entrance channel. WATERWAY CONNECTING PAMLICO SOUND AND BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 21 of text) A 7-foot channel 75 feet wide from Pamlico Sound to Beaufort Harbor via Wainright Channel. A 7-foot channel 75 feet wide to Atlantic. Channels, 7 feet deep, 75 feet wide, at east and west ends of Harkers Island and side channel 5 feet deep, 75 feet wide, with basin 150 by 130 feet, same depth, at Davis. A 7-foot side channel 75 feet wide, with basin 200 feet by 500 feet, same depth, at Sealevel. A 6-foot side channel 60 feet wide, with basin 100 feet by about 600 feet, same depth, at Marshallberg. A side channel 7 feet deep, 70 feet wide to local harbor at Cedar Island and an access channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide and about 400 feet long to a basin same depth, 60 by 100 feet. An entrance channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide, from Back Sound to harbor of refuge 120 by 250 feet, same depth, at west end of Harkers Island in Brook Creek. A channel 7 feet deep, 70 feet wide, from existing side channel at Atlantic to a basin 600 by 180 feet, same depth, with a breakwater, between mouth of Little Port Brook and White Point. Deepening the existing 5-foot channel and basin at Davis to 7 feet. H.D. 325, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 1 Detailed Project Report July 9, 1965 H.D. 485, 72d Cong., 2d sess. 1 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 92, 74th Cong., 2d sess.' H.D. 99, 77th Cong., I1st sess. 1 S.D. 247, 77th Cong., 2d sess.1 H.D. 68, 81st Cong., 1st sess.1 Detailed Project Report Dec. 12, 1962 Detailed Project Report March 13, 1967 Detailed Project Report Dec. 21, 1967 Detailed Project Report Feb. 8, 1974 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Public Law No. 443, 72d Cong. 3. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 4. Tidal lock in land cut between Myrtle Sound and Cape Fear River, deauthorized September 23, 1986, under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 5. Deauthorized August 5, 1977, under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 6. A 12-foot by 90-foot channel in New River from Intracoastal Waterway to and including a basin at Jacksonville, N. C. 7. Jetties on each side of Masonboro Inlet. 8. A 6-foot by 50-foot channel provided under Section 3, River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945; 12-foot by 90-foot project deauthorized November 17, 1986, under authority of Sec. 1002, PL 99-662. 9. Included in the Public Works Administration Program, Jan. 3, 1934. 10. Deauthorized by the Chief of Engineers March 31, 1982. 11. Deauthorized January 1, 1990, under authority of Sec. 1001(b)(1), PL 99-662. 6-30 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1998 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report for Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Control' (R & H Act of 1958 and 1962) Bay River, N. C.' Black River, N. C. Cashie River, N. C. Channel Connecting Thoroughfare Bay with Cedar Bay, N. C.' Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, N.C.' Chowan River, N. C. Contentnea Creek, N. C.' Edenton Harbor, N. C.' Fishing Creek, N. C.' Knobb's Creek, N. C.' ,2 Mackay Creek, N. C.' Newbegun Creek, N. C. Northeast Cape Fear River, N. C.' Pembroke Creek, N. C. Perquimans River, N. C.' Scuppernong River, N. C.' Smith's Creek (Pamlico County), N. C.' Smiths Creek (Wilmington), N. C.' South River, N. C.' Stumpy Point Bay, N.C.' Swift Creek, N. C.' Trent River, N. C. 1,4 Wallace Channel, Pamlico Sound, N. C. Waterway connecting Swanquarter Bay with Deep Bay, N.C.' Waterway - Norfolk, Va. to Sounds of N. C. Wrights Creek, N. C.' 1. Completed. 2. Transferred from Norfolk District (FY 1970); Meherrin River, N. C., transferred to Norfolk District. 3. Report of Norfolk District. 4. 8-foot modification deauthorized August 5, 1977, under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 6-31 1969 1950 1969 1950 1975 1997 1950 1941 1960 1922 19613 19383 19283 1950 1976 19103 1950 1989 1950 1936 1997 1940 1968 1965 1997 1976 1984 70,664 44,382 12,358 40,403 69,610 88,328 64,395 73,750 22,715 80,500 13,375 4,802 10,688 60,000 13,750 81,164 113,273 8,507 12,452 268,381 1,600 115,199 132,834 751,099 751,196 68,325 49,627 124,846 15,905 25,615 3,280,185 32,247 47,642 8,633 48,969 6,273 247 61,139 414 87,282 52,945 18 23,686 1,440,650 5,422 143,579 85,299 193,880 2,893,812 166,602 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 6-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1998 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Fort Fisher and Vicinity, N.C. 1997 5,966,730 Fort Macon Park, N. C.1 1973 620,000 1. Uncompleted portion of project was deauthorized November 17, 1986, under authority of Sec. 1002, PL 99-662. 6-32 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Project Ararat River, Mount Airy, N. C. 1 Black River, Harnett County, N. C. 1 Blackberry Creek, Henry Country, Va.' Broad Creek, Beaufort County, N. C. 1 Brunswick County Beaches, N. C. (Cape Fear to North Carolina - South Carolina State Line) 1 ' Conetoe Creek, N. C.' Contentnea Creek, N. C.1 19: Core Creek, N. C.' Dan River, Madison Wastewater Treatment Plant, N. C. 1 Deep Creek, Edgecombe County, N. C.1 Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, N. C.1 Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N. C. 1 Filberts Creek, N. C. 1 Gapway Swamp, N. C. & S. C. 1 ' 9 Gardners Creek, N. C. 1 Genoa Sewer Facility, Wayne County, N. C.1 Goldsboro, Neuse River, N. C. Joyce Creek, Camden County, N. C. 1 Leesville, Va.1 Leith's Creek, Scotland County, N. C.", 1 Lick Run, Roanoke, Va.' Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N. C.' Little Sugar Creek, Charlotte, N. C.' 9 Lower Creek, Lenoir, N.C.' Neuse River, Oriental, N. C. New River, N. C.' New River, Onslow County, N. C.' Northeast Cape Fear River, N. C.' Old Field Swamp, N. C.",9 Oriental, South Avenue, N.C.' Pantego Creek and Cucklers Creek, N. C. Pasquotank River, N. C. Perquimans River, N. C. 1 Pungo Creek, N. C.' Pungo River, N. C. 1 Randleman Lake, N.C. Reddies River Lake, N. C.11 Roaring River Lake, N. C." Simmons Bay, N. C. 9 South Creek, N. C.' Stuart, Va.' Swift Creek, Pitt and Craven Counties, N. C. 1 Tar River, N. C. Tar River, N. C.' Tar River and tributaries, N. C.' Tar River, Princeville, N. C. Thomasville (Walnut Street), N.C.' Trent River, N. C.' Waccamaw River & Seven Creeks, N. C. & S. C. 9 White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, N.C.1' 1. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under continuing authority. 2. Includes $17,356 refund to local interests. 3. Adjusted to reflect actual cost. 4. Includes $116,508 refund to local interests. 5. Includes $1,519 refund to local interests. 6. Includes $387 refund to local interests. 0-5533 For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1987 1984 1994 1972 1976 1960 39-1943 & 1958 1965 1989 1984 1963 1971 1970 1969 1972 1985 1984 1984 1989 1982 1974 1978 1979 1997 1992 1950 & 1956 1972 1961 1969 1997 1963 1960 1961 1972 1971 1994 1980 1978 1963 1971 1989 1966 1964 1947 1943 1967 1996 1953 1961 1963 Cost to September 30, 1998 214,286 7. Includes $338 refund to local interests. 8. Adjusted $3,000 to include preauthorization cost prior to FY 1960. 9. Transferred from Charleston District, FY 1980. 10. Reclassified to inactive category February 3, 1976. 11. Transferred from Charleston District, FY 1984. 12. Includes $1,057 refund to local interests. Construction 4,901,854 475,574 22,870 283,846 572,1144 29,867 50,889 236,2238 175,315 394,055 223,413 138,1175 37,7773 374,005 54,5977 167,800 50,430 606,18912 367,755 430,951 1,280,317 113,657 763,022 638,500 370,446 51,896 580,977 95,873 86,600 542,800 517,948 80,931 6,366 582,270 296,6022,3 4,786,088 985,800 370,000 186,435 194,3676 2,220,440 611,096 81,266 18,624 22,660 390,249 59,919 64,769 67,821 Operation and Maintenance 623,687 61,473 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 6-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For See Project Adkin Branch, N. C. AIWW - Mooring Basins AIWW - New River Onslow County, N. C. AIWW - Peltier Creek, N. C. 12-foot project AIWW - Tidal Lock in Snows Cut Bodie Island, N. C. Cape Lookout, N. C. Conoho Creek, N. C. Contentnea Creek, N. C. Davis, N. C. Fort Macon State Park, N. C., Remaining Work Harbor of Refuge, Cape Lookout, N. C. Hominy Swamp, N. C. Howards Mill Lake, N.C. Hyde County Dike, N. C. MacKay Creek, N.C. Mann's Harbor, N. C. Mill Creek, N. C. Mocassin Swamp, N. C. Morehead City Harbor, N. C. Jetties at Beaufort Inlet Moyock Creek, N. C. Nahunta Swamp, N. C. Neuse River, N. C. Neuse River Barrier, N. C. Neuse River, 300 ft.-wide channel in front of New Bern, N. C. North River Dike, N. C. Ocracoke Inlet Jetty, N. C. Ocracoke Island, N. C. Roanoke River, 50 mile long Channel from Palmyra Landing to Weldon, N. C. Rockfish Creek, N. C. Scuppernong River, N. C. Six Runs Creek, N. C. Sweetwater Creek, N. C. Thoroughfare Swamp, N. C. Topsail Beach and Surf City, N. C. Tranters Creek, N. C. Trent River, Basins and Access Channels at New Bern, N. C. Wilmington Harbor Widening - and Deepening, N. C. Last Full Report Annual Report For 1982 None 1990 None None None None 1974 1972 1982 1973 1934 1973 1980 None 1976 1973 1973 1973 1986 1973 1973 None None None None 1986 1975 1983 1976 1987 1971 1973 1976 None 1974 None 1990 Date Deauthorized 8 Sept. 812 5 Aug. 77' 1 Jan. 906 17 Nov. 865 23 Sept. 861 5 Aug. 771 5 Aug. 771 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 783 31 Mar. 824 17 Nov. 865 1 Nov. 811 31 Mar. 782 9 Jul. 958 5 Aug. 771 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 784 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 17 Nov. 865 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 784 5 Aug. 771 5 Aug. 771 5 Aug. 771 17 Nov. 865 17 Nov. 865 17 Nov. 865 31 Mar. 782 20 Apr. 882 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 5 Aug. 771 11 Jan. 852 5 Aug. 771 1 Jan. 906 Federal Contributed Funds Funds Expended Expended 219,477 - 79,782 4,250 25,419 1,396,653 107,472 698,400 130,900 7,265 116,395 36,680 64,416 65,673 30,911 129,592 157,721 234, 032 64,977 64,584 132,767 139,339 1. Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 2. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority provided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 205 of the 1948 FC Act, as amended. 3. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority provided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. 4. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority provided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 107 of the R&H Act of 1960, as amended. 5. Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 1002, PL 99-662. 6. Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 1001(b)(1), PL 99- 662. 7. Cost-to-date included in remaining authorized portion of project (Engineering and Design only). 8. Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 1001(b)(2), PL 99-662. 6-34 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-H Project RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Date Survey Conducted Avon Harbor, N.C. Beaufort Harbor, N.C. Far Creek, N.C. Pamlico and Tar Rivers, N.C. Rollinson Channel, N.C. Silver Lake Harbor, N.C. Waterway connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, N.C. July 1998 September 1998 August 1998 October 1997 December 1997 April 1998 May 1998 NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization) TABLE 6-I Study Identification Fiscal Period Cost Crows Nest Channel, N.C. 21 Durant Channel, Dare County, N.C. 21,110 Harkers Island, Carteret County, N.C. 9,653 Morehead City Harbor, Pine Knoll Shores, N.C.1 26,570 Morehead City Harbor, West Turning Basin, N.C. 7,141 Newport River, Carteret County, N.C. 28,816 Walter Slough, Dare County, N.C. 90,861 1. Sec. 111 Project. 6-35 TABLE 6-J DAMS AND RESERVOIRS See Miles Height Reservoir Power Estimated Section Project Name Nearest City River Above of Type Capacity Development Construc- Cost Lands Total in Text Mouth Dam (Ft) (acre-feet) (kilowatts) tion and Damages 23. Cape Fear B. Everett Jordan 2 River Basin, Howards Mill 1 " N.C. Randleman" Small reservoirs 31. Neuse River Falls 2 Basin, N.C. Wilson Mills Beulahtown Bakers Mills Little Buffalo Buckhorn Wiggins Mill Stantonsburg Great Swamp Black Creek Aycock Swamp Hillsboro Orange 34. Yadkin River W. Kerr Scott, N.C. Basin, N.C.& S.C. 37. Roanoke River John H. Kerr, Va., and Basin, Va. and N.C.' N.C. Philpott, Va. 2 Gaston, Va. and N.C. Roanoke Rapids, N.C. 7 Smith Mountain, Va." Leesville, Va.9 Taber, Va. Melrose, Va. Randolph, Va. Stuart, Va. and N.C. Schoolfield, Va. and N.C. Moncure, N.C. Carthage, N.C. Randleman, N.C. Falls, N.C. Wilson Mills, N.C. Kenly, N.C. Princeton, N.C. Kenly, N.C. Wilson, N.C. Wilson, N.C. Stantonsburg, N.C. Fremont, N.C. Wilson, N.C. Fremont, N.C. Durham, N.C. Durham, N.C. Wilkesboro, N.C. Boydton, Va. Bassett, Va. Roanoke Rapids, N.C. Roanoke Rapids, N.C. Altavista, Va. Altavista, Va. Altavista, Va. Bookneal, Va. Chase City,Va. Spray, NC Danville, Va. Hlaw Deep Deep Various Neuse Neuse Little Little Little Buffalo Creek Contentnea Creek Contentnea Creek Tisnot Swamp Great Swamp Black Creek Aycock Swamp Eno Little Yadkin-Pee Dee Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke 4.3 55.0 85.0 404.0 178.7 336.2 144.9 137.0 314.2 293.7 275.0 262.9 227.8 297.2 265.9 1. Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2. For details, see individual report. 3. Includes $3,700,000 presently allocated to water supply to be reimbursed in the future by local interests and $44,000 cash contribution for construction of ranger security buildings. 4. Includes $13,637,000 presently allocated to water supply and $21,595,000 recreation and fish and wildlife to be reimbursed in the future by local interests. 5. Exclusive of transmission lines. 6. Construction completed in 1963 by Virginia Electric and Power Co. 7. Based on modified plan developed in fiscal year 1949. Construction completed June 1955 by Virginia Electric and Power Co. 112 E 753,500 - 89,186,000 58,414,000 147,600,000' 106 E 233,000 - 18,874,000 14,726,000 33,600,000" 110 E 108,000 - 62,300,000 61,700,000 124,000,000 ' 20 to 70 + E 923,000 - - - 38,454,000 92 E 335,620 - 91,334,000 91,666,000 183,000,000' 81 CG,E 201,000 - - - 13,000,000 50 E 81,000 - - - 9,300,000 53 E 36,000 - - - 6,600,000 51 E 13,000 - - - 1,100,000 63 E 119,000 - - - 17,300,000 42 E 35,000 - - - 6,700,000 36 E 48,000 - - - 5,100,000 39 E 18,000 - - - 1,800,000 33 E 17,000 - - - 1,500,000 37 E 7,000 - - - 550,000 136 E 123,000 - - - 8,100,000 107 E 57,000 - - - 3,500,000 148 E 153,000 - 5,749,343 3,360,657 9,110,000 144 CG,E 2,808,000 204,000 67,529,000 24,521,000 92,050,000 220 CG" 249,800 14,000 13,933,000 1,157,000 15,090,000 108 CG,E 432,000 54,000 27,000,000 3,500,000 30,500,000 75 CG 59,300 83,000 31,300,000 800,000 32,100,000 244 CG 825,000 41,000 28,000,000 3,800,000 31,800,000 95 CG,E 76,900 20,000 9,100,000 1,000,000 10,100,000 54 CG 34,000 12,000 8,000,000 1,700,000 9,700,000 110 CG,E 120,000 43,000 17,700,000 6,000,000 23,700,000" 147 CG,E 350,000 48,000 22,100,000 4,700,000 26,800,000 138 E 163,000 15,000 9,000,000 1,100,000 10,100,000 126 CG,E 248,000 80,000 27,800,000 6,400,000 36,000,000 8. Construction completed in February 1966 by Appalachian Power Co. 9. Construction completed in June 1963 by Appalachian Power Co. 10. Includes cost of earth dam on Whipping Creek. 11. Authorizing legislation provided for earth dam; concrete gravity dam constructed. 12. Includes $1,600,000 presently allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife. 13. Includes $74,058,000 presently allocated to water supply, $8,646,000 allocated to recreation and $8,296,000 to flood control to be paid by local intersts during construction. 14. Deauthorized July 1995. Key E ........................... E arth CG ......................... Concrete-Gravity 'l J 11 O 0 0H 0 0 0 60 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization) TABLE 6-K Study Identification Fiscal Period Cost Adkin Branch, Kinston, N. C. 37,471 Battery Island Bird Habitat Preservation, N.C.4 115,339 Big Foot Creek, Clarkton, N.C. 42,603 Dan River, Halifax County, N.C. 26,270 Hominy Swamp, Wilson, N. C. 9,761' White Marsh, Whiteville, N.C. 24,272 John H. Kerr, Wolftrap Waterfowl Impoundment, Va.2 12,015 Little Sugar Creek Habitat Restoration, N.C.2 16,807 Long Beach Restoration of Sea Turtle Habitat, N.C.' 167,663 Tar River, River Road, Greenville, N.C.3 41,487 Wanchese Marsh Creation and Protection, Dare County, N.C.4 103,281 1. Includes $4,662 contributed funds. 2. Sec. 1135 Project. 3. Sec. 14 Project. 4. Sec. 204 Project. 6-37 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT* This district comprises all of South Carolina (except local watersheds draining into the Savannah River). It embraces the drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean between Little River and Port Royal Sound, except watersheds of Mackey and Skull Creeks, and excluding Hilton Head Island. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Aquatic Plant Control, SC .................... 7-1 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL ........... 7-2 3. Charleston Harbor, SC ........................ 7-2 4. Charleston Harbor Rediversion (Fish Lift), SC ............................ 7-3 5. Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC ............ 7-3 6. FollyRiver, SC ............................ 7-4 7. Georgetown Harbor, SC ....................... 7-4 8. Little River Inlet, NC and SC ................... 7-4 9. MurrellsInlet, SC ............................ 7-4 10. Port Royal Harbor, SC ......................... 7-5 11. Shipyard River, SC ........................... 7-5 12. Town Creek, SC ............................. 7-6 13. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ........... 7-6 14. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............ 7-6 15. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ............................. 7-6 Shore Protection 16. Myrtle Beach, SC ............................ 7-6 17. Other Authorized Shore Protection Projects ....... 7-6 18. Shore Protection Work Under Special Authorization 7-7 Flood Control 19. Inspection of Completed Works ................. 7-7 20. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ......... 7-7 21. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .. 7-7 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, SC Location. The project includes all public waters in the State of South Carolina. Existing Project. The project provides for the control of noxious aquatic plant growths from public waters in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, and public health. Emergency Bank Protection 22. Streambank Erosion Under Special Authorization .. 7-7 23. Indian Bluff, SC .......................... 7-7 24. SC DOT Bridges, SC ......................... 7-7 Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 25. Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power ........ 7-8 Miscellaneous 26. Ecosystem Restoration and Protection ........... 7-8 27. Murphy Island, SC ......................... 7-8 28. Emergency Response Activities ................. 7-8 General Investigations 29. Active Investigations .......................... 7-8 Tables Table 7-A Cost and Financial Statement .............. 7-9 Table 7-B Authorizing Legislation ....... . ......... 7-12 Table 7-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ...... 7-18 Table 7-D Other Authorized Shore Protection Projects ......... ......... 7-18 Table 7-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .......................... . 7-19 Table 7-F Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power .. 7-19 Table 7-G Deauthorized Projects ............ ...... 7-20 Table 7-H Streambank Erosion Under Special Authorization .......................... 7-20 Table 7-I Active General Investigations ............. 7-21 Table 7-J Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ........................ 7-22 Table 7-K Inspection of Completed Works ........... 7-22 *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. Local Cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and contribute 50 percent of the total cost. The South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, Water Resources Division, is designated as the State's lead agency for aquatic plant management and meets local interest requirements. 7-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Operations and results during fiscal year. Aquatic plants now infest approximately 6,350 acres, with the worst infestations occurring in the Ashepoo River, Cooper River, Lakes Marion and Moultrie and the Santee Coastal Reserve. During FY 98, 1,862 acres of aquatic plants in 17 water bodies were treated with herbicides. The total cost of control operations (non-Federal and Federal) in FY 98 was $273,223. The total Federal share of work performed in FY 98 was $11,887. 2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (CHARLESTON DISTRICT) Location. The project starts near Little River at the North Carolina-South Carolina state line and extends generally south along the coast of South Carolina 62 miles to Winyah Bay; thence 63.5 miles to Charleston; thence 84.5 miles to and including Port Royal Sound; a total of 210 miles. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11513, 11521, 11531, 11534, and 11535.) Previous projects. For further details see page 613 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. The project provides for a waterway twelve feet deep and not less than 90 feet wide with a branch channel of the same dimensions to McClellanville and construction of three bridges crossing the waterway in Horry County, South Carolina. Existing project was completed in 1940; three bridges were completed in 1936. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are rail-water terminals at Georgetown, Charleston and Port Royal and numerous open-pile wharves mostly for shipping agricultural products, fish, oysters, pulpwood, wood products, and petroleum products. Marinas are located at convenient intervals along the waterway where limited supplies and repair facilities are available for both commercial vessels and pleasure craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and recreation requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed by Marinex using a pipeline dredge in the AIWW from Charleston to Port Royal during October 1997 - December 1997, removing 1,002,241 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $627,284 Costs of $15,736 were paid to Eastern Dredging for work performed in FY 94. Costs of $1,113,505 were incurred for contract dike maintenance. Condition and operation studies, natural resource management, project operations management, lands and damages, water control management, planning, engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $773,740. Federal costs for the project were $2,530,265. 3. CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina about 15 miles south of the midpoint of the coastline, 50 miles southwest of Winyah Bay, SC, and 80 miles northeast of the mouth of Savannah River. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 and 11524.) Previous projects. For further details see page 1808 of the Annual Report for 1915; page 579 of the Annual Report for 1926; page 562 of the Annual Report for 1938; page 425 of the Annual Report for 1962; and page 7-2 of the Annual Report for 1997. Existing project. The project as authorized by the 1996 Water Resources Development Act provides for deepening of the entrance channel from 42 ft deep to 47 ft deep and the inner channels from 40 ft deep to 45 ft deep. Other improvements include realignment/widening of various channels/reaches, construction of a new turning basin opposite the future Daniel Island terminal, construction of a new contraction dike, reconstruction of two existing dikes and removal of a third existing dike. Ultimate project cost after 10% reimbursement will be $85,433,000 (Federal) and $53,267,000 (non-Federal) for a total project cost of $138,700,000 (fully funded). (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and borrow and excavated or dredged material disposal areas, after reductions for such credit have been made in the required cash payments. Provide and maintain, at its own expense, the local service facilities. All berthing areas will be maintained at the project depth of 45 ft at all commercial terminals, piers, and docks. Pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to general navigation facilities during construction. Reimburse an additional 10 percent of the costs of general navigation features allocated to commercial navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction, as partially reduced by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights of way, and relocations, provided for commercial navigation. The non-Federal partner is the South Carolina State Ports Authority. The Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on June 5, 1998. Terminal facilities. The SC State Ports Authority owns and operates four public terminals and a grain elevator in Charleston Harbor. These terminals offer more than two miles of berthing space, room enough for seventeen vessels at one time. The Ports Authority operates fifteen custom-built container cranes and a variety of gantry and mobile cranes for breakbulk applications. On the land side, Charleston has extensive interstate and rail connections and is served by over 100 motor carriers. Modern facilities are also at wharves of seven major petroleum companies including storage tank farms. Modern facilities for marine repairs and servicing are available at Detyens Shipyard, located approximately ten miles northeast of Charleston on the Wando River. The Charleston Naval Complex Redevelopment Authority is currently marketing the former naval facilities to private industry 7-2 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT and businesses. For further details see Port Series No. 13, 1987, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The contract for removal of the contraction dike at Daniel Island was awarded in September 1998. The first major dredging contract is scheduled to be awarded in March 1999. Costs of $1,169,684 were incurred for engineering and design efforts. Federal costs were $869,684. Maintenance: Dredging was performed by Eastern Dredging Company using a pipeline dredge in the inside shoals including Wando River during December 1997 - September 1998, removing 2,055,700 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $3,047,069. Costs of $29,917 were paid to Eastern Dredging for work performed in FY 96. Costs of $451,583 were incurred for diking activities at Clouter Creek. Condition and operation studies, water control management, natural resource management, project operations management, lands and damages, planning, engineering and design, and supervision and administration costs were $839,143. Federal costs for maintenance were $4,367,712. 4. CHARLESTON HARBOR REDIVERSION (FISH LIFT), SC Location. Cooper River is located in Charleston and Berkeley Counties, SC, and empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Charleston, SC. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 and 11524.) All works of improvement are in Berkeley County about 45 miles from Charleston, SC. Existing Project. The completed Cooper River, Charleston Harbor project (See Section 5) resulted in significant reduction in the transfer ofblueback herring into the Santee Cooper Lakes. The landlocked striped bass fishery, a major tourist attraction, is dependent on these fish for forage. A model study, completed in March 1992 at CEWES, determined how the turbine discharge could be prevented from overwhelming the attractant flow through the fish lift and how best to improve fish passage. Phase I construction consisted of installation of new wing walls to keep turbulence from the turbines from interfering with the attractant flow to the fish lift entrance. Construction of Phase I was 100% complete in FY 95. Phase IIA work consisted of installing adjustable weirs and control equipment on the newly installed concrete wingwalls. Construction was completed in January 1998. Phase IIB work will consist of installation of three 42 inch siphon pipes, intake structure and outfall structure to increase flow to attract fish. Phase IIB is scheduled for completion in October 1999. Monitoring of the fish lift operation for two years after construction will be required to gather and analyze data to be used to refine the operation of the fish lift and to ensure its effectiveness. Total estimated cost of the project is $6,450,000, all Federal. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. The contract for Phase IIA was awarded to Brantley Construction Company, Inc. on March 15, 1996 (see above existing project write-up for description of phase). Construction payments in FY 98 for Phase IIA were $12,516. Model testing for Phase IIB work is underway at the Waterways Experiment Station. Costs for model testing, engineering and design, and supervision and administration were $391,134. Federal costs for the project were $403,650. 5. COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC Location. Cooper River is located in Charleston and Berkeley Counties, SC, and empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Charleston (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 and 11524.) Existing project. The major cause of the shoaling problem in Charleston Harbor was the diversion of fresh water from the Santee River through Pinopolis Dam into the salt water of Charleston Harbor, which caused density currents which trapped sediments resulting in a phenomenal rate of deposition. The most practical solution of the shoaling problem was to redivert most of the Santee River waters above Pinopolis Dam back into the lower Santee River through a canal beginning at Lake Moultrie and extending to the Santee River in the vicinity of St. Stephen, South Carolina. The project for Cooper River, as authorized by the 1968 River and Harbor Act, provided that the discharge through the existing Pinopolis Hydroplant be reduced to a flow which would not establish a density current in the harbor. This flow was estimated at 3,000 cubic feet per second (cfs) during the design phase of the project, but after operational tests, this flow is estimated at 4,500 cfs. The excess water impounded in Lake Moultrie is being directed through a new canal above St. Stephen, South Carolina, to enter the Santee River at a point well below the Lake Marion Spillway (Wilson Dam). A new hydroelectric facility was constructed on the new canal at the edge of the swamp adjacent to the Santee River. This plant replaces those features made less effective at Pinopolis through curtailment of flows. The average flow of 11,000 cfs at the new powerplant, plus the 4,500 cfs average release planned for Pinopolis, approximates the historical average flow at Pinopolis. The three generators at the new plant are rated at 28,000 kilowatts each, for a total of 84,000 kilowatts. In the interest of fish and wildlife resources of the area, the project includes a herring lift at the new powerhouse site and a fish hatchery. Construction as initiated March 1977. The power-on-line date was March 1985. The power plant, channels and canals, and attendant work was completed in FY 85. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Design efforts for the modification of the cooling towers are underway. The cooling towers were not able to deliver the required cooling capacity after the project came on-line in March 1985. The Corps bears all lost capacity costs until such time as the facility or 7-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 its operation can be modified at our expense to eliminate such losses. Capacity loss payment was $461,000. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $69,275. Federal costs for the project were $530,275. Maintenance: Funds of $3,625,660 were spent for maintenance of completed work. 6. FOLLY RIVER, SC Location. The project begins in Folly River and Folly Creek north of the Town of Folly Beach and follows a southwesterly course into the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11521.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel, eleven feet deep by 100 feet wide extending from the Stono River three milse through the ocean bar; a channel within Folly River nine feet deep and 80 feet wide, extending three miles downstream from U. S. Highway 171 to the confluence of Folly and Stono Rivers; and a channel within Folly Creek nine feet deep by 80 feet wide extending three miles downstream from Highway 171 to the confluence with the Folly River. The existing project was completed in FY 79. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed by the government-owned sidecaster dredge Fry during May 1998 at a cost of $161,100. Condition and operations studies, planning, engineering and design and supervision and administrative costs were $29,661. Federal costs for the project were $190,761. 7. GEORGETOWN HARBOR, SC Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina 50 miles northeast of Charleston Harbor and 90 miles southwest of the entrance to Cape Fear River, North Carolina. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11532) Previous projects. For further details see page 1806 of Annual Report for 1915; page 549 of Annual Report for 1938; and page 442 of Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorizations provide for a channel 27 feet deep with varying widths of 600 feet to 400 feet from the Atlantic Ocean to and including a turning basin at the U. S. Highway 17 bridge over Sampit River, with a side channel 2,400 feet long and not less than 200 feet wide leading to a turning basin at the upper end of the built-up portion of the city waterfront, a total of 17.9 miles. The project also provides for the continued maintenance to a depth of 18 feet and a width of 400 feet for the bypassed portion of Sampit River opposite the City of Georgetown. The existing project was completed in 1951. The jetties were completed in 1903 - 1904. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities at the Port of Georgetown, suitable for oceangoing vessels, consist of one 500 foot concrete pier with creosote-timber fenders and one 700 foot concrete and steel bulkhead, both of which are backed up by 25 acres of paved area. Since 1984 approximately $8.5 million has been spent on structures and improvements by the SC State Ports Authority and private interests. Other than the 700 foot bulkhead, recent improvements include a 43,000 foot warehouse, salt dome, cement dome, three lumber sheds, plus acquisition often additional acres of land. For further details, see Port Series No. 13, 1987, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed (a) by Marinex in the Sampit River and Upper Winyah Bay by pipeline dredge during February 1998 - September 1998, removing 1,052,868 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $1,609,754, and (b) by NATCO in the entrance channel by hopper dredge during January 1998 - March 1998, removing 611,920 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $1,513,295. Cost of $218,140 were incurred for dike maintenance. Water control management, natural resource management, condition and operation studies, project operations management, easement acquisition, planning, engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $543,788. Federal costs for the project were $3,884,977. 8. LITTLE RIVER INLET, NC AND SC Location. The project is located near the North Carolina-South Carolina state line. Little River enters the Atlantic Ocean at Little River Inlet at the state line and affords the only connection between the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway and the ocean along 68 miles of coastline from Shallotte, N. C. to Georgetown, S. C. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11535.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel twelve feet by 300 feet across the ocean bar; thence a ten by 90-foot inner channel to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. The entrance channel is stabilized by jetties extending seaward 3,284 feet and 3,830 feet long on the east and west sides of the inlet, respectively. The project was completed in FY 84. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully in compliance. Terminal facilities. There are eight marinas, numerous private docks, and several public boat ramps located in or near Little River. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies, 7-4 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT water control management, and supervision and administration costs were $8,353. 9. MURRELLS INLET, SC Location. The project is located on the coast of South Carolina, in Georgetown County, about 13 miles southwest of the City of Myrtle Beach. The inlet is the ocean entrance through a barrier beach to several tidal streams in the Murrells Inlet-Garden City estuarine area. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11535.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel twelve feet by 300 feet across the seaward bar; thence a ten by 90-foot inner channel to a turning basin at the old Army crashboat dock. The entrance channel is stabilized by ocean jetties extending seaward 3,445 feet and 3,319 feet on the north and south sides of the inlet, respectively. The recreational project includes a walkway on the south jetty with access road and parking area. The existing project was completed in 1981. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully in compliance. Terminal facilities. There are five marinas and numerous private docks located about the Murrells Inlet Harbor. There are several public boat ramps in the area. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Condition and operations studies, water control management costs, mapping, and supervision and administration costs were $15,020. 10. PORT ROYAL HARBOR, SC Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina 57 miles southwest of Charleston Harbor and 23 miles northeast of the mouth of the Savannah River. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11516.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel from the ocean through Port Royal Sound to Port Royal, South Carolina, 27 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar and in Port Royal Sound for approximately 12.8 miles, thence 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Beaufort River and Battery Creek for approximately 8.8 miles to and including a turning basin 27 feet deep and 600 feet wide opposite the wharf of the South Carolina State Ports Authority. The existing project was completed in 1959. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Facilities include one 565 foot concrete wharf and one 50 ton gantry crane. Since the late 1980's improvements to the port facilities consist of two large cargo tanks for storage of clay, a freezer for exports, additional warehouse space and the dock has been reinforced. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Dredging was performed by NATCO using a hopper dredge in the entrance channel during March 1998, removing 263,018 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $656,951. Condition and operation studies, water control management, project operations, natural resource management, planning, engineering and design, and supervision and administration costs were $163,119. Federal costs for the project were $820,070. 11. SHIPYARD RIVER, SC Location. This waterway is a tidal tributary of Charleston Harbor, South Carolina. It has its source about one-half mile below the U. S. Naval Base, whence it flows southerly about one and onehalf miles and empties into the Cooper River, about three-fourths miles above Drum Island. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11524.) Previous projects. For details, see page 610 of Annual Report for 1932, page 463 of Annual Report for 1944, and page 534 of the Annual Report for 1952. Existing project. The 1986 Water Resources Development Act authorized deepening to 38 feet and enlarging the lower turning basin to 1000 ft. as part of the Charleston Harbor, SC improvement. New work dredging was accomplished in 1989 and 1996 under the Charleston Harbor, SC improvement. The entrance channel and the lower turning basin have been deepened to 38 feet. Cost for that work is reflected in the cost for the Charleston Harbor improvement. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Located in the lower three-quarters of a mile of the channel are wharves operated by the Chevron USA Products Company and the Shipyard River Coal Terminal Company. These wharves accommodate deep-draft, oceangoing vessels for handling petroleum products, coal and miscellaneous dry bulk materials. Located mid-channel are Salmons Dredging Corporation, Detyens Shipyard, and Pre-Stress Concrete Company. For further details see Port Series No. 13, 1987, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Dredging was performed by Eastern using a pipeline dredge during August 1998 - September 1998, removing 428,997 cubic yds of material, at a cost of $703,507. Water control management, project operations management, planning, engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $51,651. Federal costs for the project were $755,158. 7-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 16. TOWN CREEK, SC Location. Town Creek Channel begins at the AIWW directly south of the Town of McClellanville in Charleston County, SC. The channel follows Five Fathom Creek in a southerly direction to the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11531.) Existing project. The project provides a channel ten feet deep by 80 feet wide from the AIWW to the mouth of Five Fathom Creek, a distance of 6.2 miles. The project includes an entrance channel twelve feet deep by 100 feet wide across the ocean bar, a distance of 4.0 miles. The existing project was completed in 1975. In 1989, Hurricane Hugo breached Sandy Point and created a new inlet to the ocean. This inlet continued to increase in size and was being used by local traffic to get to the Atlantic Ocean. In 1997, the district requested authority to maintain this new inlet in lieu of the existing authorized channel. Our request to abandon the existing Town Creek channel alignment and establish the Clark's Creek channel alignment was approved by headquarters. The proposed channel relocation, due to natural occurrences, is within the scope of the project authorization. The authorized project dimensions of 12 feet deep by 100 feet wide shall be maintained as appropriate. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed by the government-owned sidecaster dredge Fry during May 1998, at a cost of $262,800. Condition and operations studies, water control management, project operations, natural resource management, planning, engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $40,335. Federal costs for the project were $303,135. 13. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Costs of $30,018 were incurred for a survey of the Ashley River. 14. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 7-C.) 15. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (Preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were Calabash Creek, NC, $6,703 and Coordination Account activities, $4,727. Snagging and Clearing for Navigation (Section 3, Public Law 79-14.) No costs incurred. Shore Protection 16. MYRTLE BEACH, SC Location. Myrtle Beach is located along the northern coast of SC. The area is commonly referred to as the Grand Strand. The Grand Strand extends from Little River Inlet at the NC border, in a southerly direction, to Murrells Inlet, SC for a total distance of approximately 37 miles. This project includes the developed area along the coast of Horry County, SC and a portion of the coastal area of Georgetown County, SC. Major municipalities in the project area include the cities of Myrtle Beach and North Myrtle Beach, Garden City, and the Town of Surfside Beach. Existing project. The plan of improvement would place about 5.1 million cubic yards of sand over a total project reach of 25.4 miles of beach encompassing three separable reaches. This material will come from offshore borrow sites. Periodic nourishment will be required once every 8 to 10 years throughout the project life of 50 years. All work is programmed. Estimated cost (October 1995 price levels) of initial construction is $35,188,000 Federal and $18,947,000 non-Federal for a total of $54,135,000. Estimated cost of periodic nourishment is $105,347,000 Federal and $56,725,000 non-Federal for a total project cost of $216,207,000. Sand placement on the North Myrtle Beach reach was completed in May 1997 placing 2.5 million cubic yards of sand. Sand placement on the Myrtle Beach reach was completed in January 1998 placing 2.3 million cubic yards of sand: Sand placement on the Garden City/Surfside reach is 50% complete; completion is scheduled for November 1998. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 7-8 of the FY 1995 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Fencing and grassing costs for the North Myrtle Beach reach were $4,055 and $663,120, respectively. Sand placement was performed by Great Lakes Dredge and Dock along Myrtle Beach by hopper and pipeline dredge during October 1997 - January 1998, placing 1,375,600 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $7,287,976. Fencing costs for the Myrtle Beach reach were $193,100. The construction contract for the Garden City/Surfside reach was awarded on June 23, 1998 to NATCO. 418,000 cubic yards of sand were placed by hopper dredge during August 1998 - September 1998 at a cost of $2,834,612. Federal share of contract payments was $6,628,754. Review of local sponsor acquisitions, engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $971,252. Federal costs for the project were $7,600,006. 17. OTHER AUTHORIZED SHORE PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Table 7-D.) 7-6 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT 18. SHORE PROTECTION WORK 23. INDIAN BLUFF, SC UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Shore Protection Activities Pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization) consisted of Arcadian Shores, SC, $5. Flood Control 19. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to maintain and operate local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. Inspections were made to determine extent of compliance and responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation on local flood protection works when appropriate. Cost for the period was $24,440. For project inspection data see Table 7-K. 20. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 7-E.) 21. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended (Preauthorization). (See Table 7-J) Emergency Bank Protection 22. STREAMBANK EROSION UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection Activities Pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 79-526 as amended (Preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were Castle Pinckney, SC, $39,995; Mosquito Creek, Bennett's Point Field Station, SC, $10,554; Pitt Street, Mt. Pleasant, SC, $8,080; Shore Drive, Singleton Swash, $23,021; and Coordination Account, $4,344. (See Table 7-H for previous projects in this category.) Snagging and Clearing of Navigable Streams and Tributaries in Interest of Flood Control, Section 208, Public Law 83-780. No costs were incurred in FY 98. Location. Indian Bluff is located adjacent to Lake Marion approximately 9 miles northwest of Eutawville near SC Hwy 6. Existing project. Indian Bluff is a park maintained by Orangeburg County, SC under lease from the SC Public Service Authority. The 42 acre park consists of a restroom facility, picnic areas, small beachfront, 144 linear foot fishing pier, and elevated nature walk. One access road leads into the park. This is the only means of ingress and egress. Approximately 110 linear feet of this road was being threatened from wind generated waves from Lake Marion. The pier, constructed in 1990 at a cost of $80,000, was also in danger of being rendered inaccessible due to the erosion. The project consisted of placement of 2,152 tons of riprap and 663 tons of bedding over geotextile fabric along a distance of approximately 1,113 linear feet. Minor clearing and snagging and shaping of the bank was also accomplished. The existing project was completed in 1997. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 7-7 of the FY 1997 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Accruals in FY 98 were overstated which resulted in adjustments to Federal costs for the project of $-2,538. 24. SC DOT BRIDGES, SC Location. This project consists of five sites. The Big Dutchman Creek site is at SC Hwy S-46-962 in central western York County and abuts the northwestern city limits of Rock Hill, SC. The Calabash Branch site is at SC Hwy S-46-414 in north central York County approximately two miles south of Clover, SC. The Glenn Creek site is at SC Hwy S-44-93 on the eastern border of Spartanburg County approximately nine miles southeast of the city limits of Spartanburg, SC. The Blue Branch site is at SC Hwy S- 11-246 in south western Cherokee County approximately three miles southwest of the city limits of Gaffney, SC. The Branch of Turkey Creek site is at SC Hwy S-29-521 in central western Lancaster County, at the southern city limits of Lancaster, SC. Existing project. The concern at each of these locations is streambank erosion threatening the embankments at the bridge abutments that will result in failure of the bridge approaches, rendering the access route unusable. The project consisted of shaping existing embankments, placing a geotextile fabric, and overlaying with a double layer mat that was injected with mortar to form a 6" thick articulated blanket. The existing project was constructed in 1997; awaiting final results of concrete tests. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 7-8 of the FY 1997 Annual Report. 7-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Operations and results during fiscal year. An adjustment to the Federal cost of $-1,259 was made as a result of a cost transfer to the non-Federal sponsor to balance the project costsharing requirements. 25. MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER (See Table 7-F.) Miscellaneous 26. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION AND PROTECTION Project modifications accomplished under the authority of Section 206, Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration, Water Resources Development Act of 1996. Fiscal year costs were Coordination Account, $3,709; and Preliminary Restoration Plans, $24,578. Project modifications accomplished under the authority of Section 204, Beneficial Use of Dredged Material, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended. No costs incurred. Project modifications accomplished under the authority of Section 1135, Project Modifications For Improvement of the Environment, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended. Fiscal year costs were Cape Marsh Management Area, Santee Coastal Reserve, $33,156; Hamlin Creek Extension Habitat Restoration, $59,801; Miller Corner Phragmites Control Project, $38,626; Old Dominion Plantation, SC, $2,057; Initial Appraisal Reports, $8,782; and Coordination Account, $5,085. 27. MURPHY ISLAND, SC Location. Murphy Island, Santee Coastal Reserve, is located at the junction of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway and the South Santee River, Charleston County, 35 miles north of Charleston, SC. Existing project. Since construction of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway to its present dimensions in 1940, the salt marsh buffer separating the waterway and the impoundments dikes on Murphy Island has disappeared. Loss of the marsh buffer has allowed spring high tides, storm surge and boat wakes to attack and erode the impoundment dikes. The project consisted of construction of 5,400 feet of setback dike, raising 4,400 feet of the existing dike and installation of seven additional water control structures. The existing project was completed in 1997. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 7-8 of the FY 1997 Annual Report Operations and results during fiscal year. An adjustment to the Federal cost was made to balance the project costsharing requirements. Federal costs for FY 98 were $18,442. 28. EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACTIVITIES - FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES Disasters. The Emergency Operations Center was activated three times (Florida Fires, Hurricane Bonnie and Hurricane Georges) in FY 98. All activations were for work performed for FEMA. Operational Program Areas. Federal costs for FY 98 were $394,615 for the Disaster Preparedness Program and $87,895 for Emergency Operations. Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting and Rescue Work (Public Law 84-99, and Antecedent Legislation). Costs of $12,214 were incurred to prepare a project information report for the Indian Bluff Rehabilitation Project. Emergency dredging was performed at the Folly Beach Rehabilitation Project. The protective storm berm was rebuilt from station 79+95 to 102+65 within the limits of the Folly Beach County Park on the west end of the island. Dredging was performed by Cottrell Engineering Corporation by pipeline dredge during April 1998 - May 1998, removing 87,800 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $231,693. Planning, engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $73,613. Federal costs for the project were $305,306. Emergency Work In Support of Other Federal Agencies. Costs of $24,230 were incurred to support a Hurricane Bonnie preposition ice mission for FEMA. Total Federal costs incurred under the Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Program was $800,030. Cost of $48,954 were incurred for the Catastrophic Disaster Preparedness Program. General Investigations 29. ACTIVE INVESTIGATIONS See Table 7-I which covers: Surveys, Collections, and Study of Basic Data, and Research and Development Activities. 7-8 TABLE 7-A CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. in Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sept. 30, 1998 1 Aquatic Plant Control, SC (Contributed Funds) 2 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, Va. and the St. Johns River, FL 3 Charleston Harbor, SC (Contributed Funds) 4 Charleston Harbor Rediversion (Fish Lift), SC 5 Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC 6 Folly River, SC New Work: Approp. Cost Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 1,270,000 1,477,677 0 0 330,000 318,805 0 0 0 6,666 0 0 0 0 167,000 11,887 0 0 0 0 10,848,605 10,687,912 52,028 52,028 7,455,378 1 7,455,378 1 2,888,000 5,119,000 2,517,000 2,457,000 74,606,668 2 2,739,077 5,319,569 2,448,351 2,530,265 74,511,635 2 -360,000 150,000 -17,753 158,544 -56,321 2,000,000 49,713,108 3 -48,635 869,684 48,582,792 3 4,177,000 3,729,000 4,784,000 4,450,000 135,190,118 4,237,876 3,533,449 4,953,257 4,367,712 135,022,149 0 -5,956 0 3,013 -15,152 300,000 12,888,848 5 43,624 300,000 12,888,848 5 950,000 700,000 160,000 380,000 3,065,000 787,387 331,597 614,574 403,650 2,982,971 0 4,585,000 356,321 455,000 204,077,512 778 5,185,203 1,432,918 530,275 204,036,958 4,978,000 3,654,000 4,202,000 3,433,000 49,952,513 6 5,096,380 3,573,977 4,044,274 3,625,660 49,790,750 6 0 0 337,736 337,736 446,000 243,000 798,000 210,000 5,165,999 447,014 252,125 793,844 190,761 5,136,979 7 Georgetown Harbor, SC New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 0 0 7,061,755 7 7,061,755 7 2,828,000 2,533,000 2,690,000 4,068,000 76,653,638 8 2,848,620 2,423,171 2,822,460 3,884,977 76,418,846 8 7-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 7-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. in Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sept. 30, 1998 8 Little River Inlet, NC and SC (Contributed Funds) 9 Murrells Inlet, SC (Contributed Funds) 10 Port Royal Harbor, SC 11 Shipyard River, SC 12 Town Creek, SC (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 0 0 39,000 41,293 0 0 33,000 26,648 0 0 0 0 90,000 76,641 40,000 40,014 0 0 34,000 37,110 0 0 0 0 84,000 87,942 0 0 0 0 17,037,428 17,037,428 0 2,992,640 8,353 2,992,348 0 0 0 0 1,521,920 1,521,920 15,502,240 15,502,240 0 4,115,054 15,020 4,111,418 0 0 0 0 1,536,893 9 1,536,893 9 1,786,100 1,786,100 581,500 933,000 133,000 809,000 14,223,643 581,609 932,981 119,173 820,070 14,219,648 0 0 290,000 755,000 289,377 726,818 0 0 491,974 10 491,974 10 5,000 736,000 11,954,554 8,586 755,158 11,941,728 219,521 219,521 679,989 396,000 570,000 312,000 7,813,286 692,321 393,924 567,404 303,135 7,794,237 0 0 8,600 8,600 7-10 TABLE 7-A CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROINA DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. in Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sept. 30, 1998 16 Myrtle Beach, SC New Work: Approp. 625,000 1,273,000 15,676,000 10,070,000 30,310,000 11 Cost 487,931 1,139,124 14,794,419 7,600,006 26,687,480 11 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. 5,000 1,100,000 7,805,000 4,500,000 13,410,000 12 Cost 0 1,093,000 6,687,598 4,620,290 12,400,887 12 23 Indian Bluff, SC New Work: Approp. 9,524 117,300 0 0 126,824 Cost 0 30,857 94,776 -2,538 123,096 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. 0 41,350 0 -318 41,032 Cost 0 850 40,133 49 41,032 24 SC DOT Bridges, SC New Work: Approp. 8,000 37,923 120,100 0 166,023 Cost 0 27,782 136,878 -1,259 163,401 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. 0 55,344 0 -877 54,467 Cost 0 224 49,100 5,143 54,467 27 Murphy Island, SC New Work: Approp. 0 55,000 176,000 10,723 241,723 Cost 0 47,352 175,928 18,443 241,723 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. 0 35,000 11,500 -12,869 33,631 13 Cost 0 0 42,570 -8,939 33,631 13 1 Includes $109,490 for new work for previous projects. 2 Includes $69,422 for maintenance of previous projects. 3 Includes $47,395,108 for previous projects and $318,000 for Preconstruction, Engineering and Design on the current project. 4 Includes $401,989 for maintenance of previous projects and $600 for maintenance expended from contributed funds for the existing project. 5 Includes $12,409,848 for the 40 ft project, excludes $2,996,994 credit for LERRD's and $1,966,945 final project reimbursement for the 40 ft project. Includes $179,000 for Preconstructon, Engineering and Design on the current project. 6 Includes $765,000 appropriated and expended in FY 96 under appropriation 96X5125 Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 7 Includes $2,445,852 for new work for previous projects. 8 Includes $114,556 for maintenance of previous projects. 9 Includes $67,000 accomplished under authority of Section 3, P.L. 79-11 incurred through FY 73. 10 Includes $4,150 for new work on previous projects. 11 Includes $2,666,000 for Preconstruction, Engineering and Design. 12 Excludes $1,635,367 credit for LERRD's. 13 Excludes $100,277 for work-in-kind credit. 7-11 REPORT ON THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Sect. in Date of Project and Work Text Authorizing Act Authorized Documents AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, SC Oct. 27, 1965 Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1925 Mar. 3, 1925 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 1 Aug. 30, 1935 2 Aug. 30, 1935 2 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Provides for control and progressive eradication of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water-milfoil and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the U.S., in combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and state agencies. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA, AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL Channel from Minim Creek to Winyah Bay. Channel from Charleston to a point opposite McClellanville. Branch channel to McClellanville. Extending the channel to Minim Creek, thence through the Esterville-Minim Canal to Winyah Bay. Cut across the Santee Delta at Four Mile Creek. Widening and deepening the waterway from Charleston to Beaufort. A waterway eight feet deep and 75 feet wide from Cape Fear River to Winyah Bay. Construction of bridges across the waterway in Horry County, SC. Cutoff between Ashepoo and Coosaw Rivers. Enlarging the channel from Winyah Bay to Charleston including the branch channel to McClellanville, to depth of ten feet and bottom width of 90 feet. Increasing dimensions of waterway to twelve feet deep and 90 feet wide. Anchorage Basin 125 feet wide, 335 feet long, twelve feet deep, near Myrtle Beach, SC. (Deauthorized by 1986 WRDA) 4 H.D. 251, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 89-298 Annual Report, 1889, p. 1184. H.D. 84, 56th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report 1900, p.1 90 8 Annual Report 1903, p. 1133 H.D. 178, 63rd Cong., 1st. sess. H.D. 237, 68th Cong., 1st sess. S.D. 178, 68th Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 41, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 14, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 129, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc 6, 75th Cong., 1st sess. 3 H.D. 327, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 7-12 2. TABLE 7-B CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Sect. in Date of Project and Work Text Authorizing Act Authorized Documents CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC 3. Jun. 18, 1878 Aug. 8, 1917 Jul. 18, 1918 Jan. 21, 1927 Oct. 17, 1940 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 14, 1960 as amended Oct. 22, 1976 Nov. 17, 1986 2 jetties. s Increase in depth to 30 feet with width of 500 feet between the jetties and 1,000 feet seaward thereof. The 40-foot channel to the Naval Base. Act provided that the 40-foot channel should not be undertaken "until the proposed new drydocks at this navy yard, carrying a depth of 40 feet of water over the blocks, has been authorized." This dock was authorized in the Naval Appropriations Act approved July 1, 1918 (40 Stat. L. 725). A 30-foot channel from the sea to Goose Creek via Cooper River, together with a 30-foot channel through Town Creek for commercial purposes. The act also provided that the 40-foot channel be prosecuted only as found necessary for national defense. The 35-foot channel depth from the sea to the head of the project via Cooper River and Town Creek, also a channel in Shem Creek to Mount Pleasant, 110 feet wide and ten feet deep, including a turning basin at the upper end. An anchorage area 30 feet deep in the water area between Castle Pinckney and Fort Moultrie. 6 (Deauthorized by 1986 WRDA) Deepen the 30-foot channel north and east of Drum Island to 35 feet. Shem Creek Channel modified by extending 1,150 feet upstream and downstream from mouth to Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Project authorized for the Phase I design memorandum stage of Advanced Engineering and Design. Deepening 35 foot channel to 40 feet (42 feet in the ocean bar and entrance channel) from the 42 foot ocean contour to Goose Creek, a distance of 27.1 miles, construction of one turning basin, modification of existing turning basins, deepening and modification of the anchorage basin, deepening Shipyard River to 38 feet, maintain the Wando River Channel to 35 feet at Federal expense and the deepening of this channel to 40 feet if economically justified. 7-13 Annual Report 1878, pp. 553-572. H.D. 288, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 1946, 64th Cong., 2nd sess, pt.1, pp. 21-29, 57, 58, and 64-68. H.D. 249, 69th Cong. 1st sess. H.D. 259, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 156, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S.D. 136, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess.3 H.D. 35, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 94-436, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. 99th Cong. 2nd sess., P.L. 96-662 REPORT ON THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Sect in Date of Project and Work Text Authorizing Act Authorized Documents Oct 12, 1996 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 17, 1991 Aug. 13, 1968 Jul. 14, 1960 as amended Aug. 5, 1886 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 Deepening of the entrance channel from 42 ft. deep to 47 ft. deep and the inner channels from 40 ft. deep to 45 ft. deep. Other improvements include realignment/widening of various channels/reaches, construction of a new turning basin opposite the future Daniel Island terminal, construction of a new contraction dike, reconstruction of two existing dikes and removal of a third existing dike. CHARLESTON HARBOR REDIVERSION (FISH LIFT), SC See Cooper River, Charleston Harbor. Modify the fish lift at the Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC (Rediversion Project) and monitor operation of the fish lift for two years following such modifications. COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC (ST. STEPHEN PROJECT) Redivert most of the Santee River waters Pinopolis Dam into the lower Santee River through a canal beginning at Lake Moultrie and extending to the Santee River in the vicinity of St. Stephen, South Carolina. FOLLY RIVER, SC Consists of stable all-tide channel nine feet deep and 80 feet wide in Folly River and Folly Creek and an entrance channel at Stono Inlet 100 feet wide and eleven feet deep. GEORGETOWN HARBOR, SC Jetties and earthen dike to protect south jetty. Previous project channel dimensions and training wall. 27-foot channel from ocean, including a turning basin in Sampit River. Cutoff and side channel in Sampit River. 104 th Cong. P.L. 104-303 S.D. 88, 90th Cong.,P.L. 90-483 P.L. 102-104 S.D. 88, 90th Cong.,P.L. 90-483 Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Dec. 23, 1977. H. Ex. Doc. 258 48th Cong., 2nd sess., and Annual Report 1885, pp. 1154-1170, and H. Ex. Doc. 117, 50th Cong., 2nd sess., and Annual Report 1889, pp. 1110-1111. H.D. 398, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. and Annual Report 1904, pp. 1591-1605. H.D. 211, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 21, 81st Cong., 1st sess. 7-14 4. 5. 6. TABLE 7-B CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Sect. in Date of Project and Work Text Authorizing Act Authorized Documents LITTLE RIVER INLET, NC AND SC Mar 2. 1945 Auth. by Senate Public Works Comm. and the House Public Works Comm. on Oct. 12, 1972, under auth. of Sec. 201, P.L. 89-298, 1965 FC Act. Mar. 7, 1974 Provides for an entrance channel twelve feet by 300 feet across the ocean bar; thence ten feet by 90-foot inner channel to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Authorized emergency dredging operations as the Chief of Engineers determines necessary to maintain channel depths sufficient to permit free and safe movement of vessels until such time as the authorized project is constructed. Sec. 3, P.L. 79-14 H.D. 362, 92nd Cong. H.D. 10203, 93rd Cong., 2nd sess., P.L. 93-251 MURRELLS INLET, SC Mar. 2, 1945 Auth. by the House Comm. on Public Works on Nov. 10, 1971, and the Senate Comm. on Public Works on Nov 18, 1971, under auth. of Sec. 201, P.L. 89-298, 1965 FC Act. Mar. 7, 1974 Provides for an entrance channel twelve feet by 300 feet across the seaward bar, thence ten by 90-foot inner channel to a turning basin at the old Army crash boat dock. Authorized emergency dredging operations as the Chief of Engineers determines necessary to maintain channel depths sufficient to permit free and safe movement of vessels until such time as the authorized project is constructed. Sec. 3, P.L. 79-14 H.D. 137, 92nd Cong. H.D. 10203, 93rd Cong., 2nd sess., P.L. 93-251 7-15 8. 9. REPORT ON THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Sect. in Date of Project and Work Text Authorizing Act Authorized Documents PORT ROYAL HARBOR, SC A channel from the ocean through Port Royal Sound to Port Royal, SC.; 27 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar and in Port Royal Sound for approximately 12.8 miles thence 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Beaufort River and Battery Creek for approximately 8.8 miles to and including a turning basin 27 feet deep and 600 feet wide opposite wharf of the SC State Ports Authority. H.D. 469, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. SHIPYARD RIVER, SC Jul. 25, 1912 Mar. 3, 1925 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 2 Mar. 2, 1945 Nov. 17, 1986 Channel depth of 15 feet and width of 100 feet. Deepening of channel to 18 feet from deep water in Cooper River upstream 1-1/16 miles. Channel depths of twelve to twenty feet. 28-feet from Cooper River to Gulf Oil Corp's terminal, and the deepening of the channel above that point to twenty feet from the depth of twelve feet previously authorized without local cooperation. Enlargement of the channel to a depth of 30 feet and a width of 200 feet up to the Gulf Oil Corp's terminal, with a turning basin 30 feet deep at the latter point. Extension of the existing 30-foot channel to vicinity of the Pittsburgh Metallurgical Co. Plant, with a turning basin at the upper end. Deepening to 38 feet under the Charleston Harbor, SC authorization. S.D. 350, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 288, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 73th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 93, 79th Cong., 1st sess. 99th Cong. 2nd sess., P.L. 96-662 TOWN CREEK, SC An entrance channel trelve feet deep by 100 feet wide across the ocean bar a distance of 4.0 miles and a channel ten feet deep by 80 feet wide from the mouth of Five Fathom Creek to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway,a distance of 6.2 miles. Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 12, 1974. MYRTLE BEACH, SC Nov. 28, 1990 Storm damage reduction for period nourishment over the 50-year life of the project. 101st Cong. P.L. 101-640 7-16 10. Sep. 3, 1954 11. 12. Jul. 14, 1960 as amended 16. TABLE 7-B CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Sect. in Date of Project and Work Text Authorizing Act Authorized Documents INDIAN BLUFF, SC Abate erosion and protect Indian Bluff Park. Sec. 14, P.L. 526. Authorized 23. Jul. 24, 1946 by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 15, 1996. SC DOT BRIDGES, SC Abate erosion and protect five South Carolina Sec. 14, P.L. 526. Authorized 24. Jul. 24, 1946 Department of Transportation bridges. by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 14, 1996. MURPHY ISLAND, SC 27. Nov. 17, 1986 Construct 5,400 feet of setback dikes, raise portions of Sec. 1135(b), P.L. 96-662 the existing dike and install seven additional water 99th Cong., 2nd sess. control structures to enhance water level management. 1/ Included in Public Works Administration Program September 6, 1933. 2/ Included in Emergency Relief Administration Program May 28, 1935. 3/ Contains latest published maps. 4/ Inactive. 5/ Completed under previous projects. 6/ For national defense. 7-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 7-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 14 of Text) For Last Full Report See Cost to Sep. 30, 1998 Annual Report Operation & Project Status For Construction Maintenance Adams Creek, SC Completed 1978 $125,697 $29,143 Aquatic Plant Control, NC and SC 1 Completed 1968 379,680 -- Archers Creek, SC Completed 1914 20,646 -- Ashley River, SC Completed 1955 260,996 589,436 Brookgreen Gardens, SC Completed 1992 94,700 2 4,011 Edisto River, SC Completed 1938 33,103 2,887 Great Pee Dee River, SC Completed 1950 183,712 271,098 Jeremy Creek, SC Completed 1996 49,987 116,175 Lynches River and Clark Creek, SC Completed 1982 9,500 85,595 Mingo Creek, SC Completed 1950 29,050 8,575 Salkahatchie River, SC Completed 1896 15,841 1,936 Santee River, NC & SC Completed 1950 99,750 182,469 Village Creek, SC Completed 1985 26,500 111,314 Waccamaw River, NC and SC Completed 1978 262,814 284,347 Wateree River, SC Completed 1940 60,000 154,559 1 Pilot Program 2 Excludes $7,800 contributed funds OTHER AUTHORIZED SHORE TABLE 7-D PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 17 of the Text) For Last Full Report See Cost to Sep. 30, 1998 Annual Report Operation & Project Status For Construction Maintenance Battery Pringle, SC Completed 1996 $99,200 1 -- Folly Beach, SC Completed 1996 $10,652,307 2 -- Hunting Island Beach, SC Completed 1984 $2,872,717 3 -- 1 Excludes $53,379 contributed funds 2 Excludes $1,059,742 contributed funds and $819,693 credit for LERRD's 3 Excludes $1,249,336 contributed funds 7-18 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT TABLE 7-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 20 of Text) For Last Full Report Cost to Sep. 30, 1998 See Annual Operation & Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Buck Creek, NC & SC 1 Completed 1970 $298,167 -- Cow Castle Creek, SC 1 Completed 1985 250,000 -- Cowpen Swamp, SC 1 Completed 1960 18,679 -- Crabtree Swamp, SC 1 Completed 1969 97,000 -- Eagle Creek, SC 1 Completed 1986 1,245,063 -- Edisto River, SC 1 Discontinued 1947 6,379 -- Edisto River, North Fork, SC 1 Completed 1969 127,660 -- Edisto River, Vicinity Canadays Landing, SC 1 Completed 1958 3,160 -- Gapway Swamp, SC 1 Completed 1969 339,197 -- Kingstree Branch, Williamsburg County, SC 1 Completed 1978 247,242 -- Leith Creek, NC 1 3 Completed 1982 430,951 -- Little Sugar Creek, NC 1 2 Completed 1969 86,600 -- Old Field Swamp, NC 1 2 Completed 1979 763,022 -- Reddies River Lake, NC 3 Completed 1980 985,800 -- Reedy River, SC 1 Discontinued 1974 4,500 -- Roaring River, Wilkes County, NC 1 3 Phase I Only 1978 370,000 -- Saluda River, SC 1 Completed 1963 99,000 -- Sawmill Branch, SC 1 Completed 1971 248,605 -- Scotts Creek, SC 1 Completed 1988 545,000 -- Shot Pouch Creek, Sumter Co., SC 1 Completed 1971 77,400 -- Simmons Bay Creek, NC 2 Completed 1963 186,435 -- Simpson Creek, SC 1 Completed 1957 81,000 -- Socastee Creek, SC 1 Completed 1996 1,093,800 -- Todd Swamp, SC 1 Completed 1964 29,000 -- Turkey Creek, Sumter County, SC 1 Completed 1974 319,669 -- Waccamaw R. & Seven Creeks, NC & SC 1 2 Completed 1961 67,821 -- Wilson Branch, Chesterfield County, SC 1 Completed 1985 277,111 1 Authorized by Chief of Engineers 2 Transferred to Wilmington District in 1980 3 Transferred to Wilmington District in 1984 MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS TABLE 7-F INCLUDING POWER (See Section 25 of the Text) For Last Full Report Cost to Sep. 30, 1998 See Annual Operation & Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Cooper River Seismic Modification, SC Completed 1992 $29,400,000 1 -- 1 Excludes $770,000 for credits to Santee Cooper 7-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 7-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Date Federal Contributed Annual Report and Funds Funds Project for Authority Expended Expended Abbapoola Creek, SC Beresford Creek, SC Charleston Hbr (Anchorage Basin), SC 1954 Congaree River, SC Little Pee Dee River, SC Lumber River, SC & NC Myrtle Beach (Anchorage Basin), SC Reedy River, Greenville, SC Russell Creek, SC TABLE 7-H 1954 1971 5 Aug 77 Section 12, P.L. 93-251 5 Aug 77 Section 12, P.L. 93-251 17 Nov 86 Section 1002, P.L. 99-662 5 Aug 77 Section 12, P.L. 93-251 5 Aug 77 Section 12, P.L. 93-251 5 Aug 77 Section 12, P.L. 93-251 17 Nov 86 Section 1002, P.L. 99-662 17 Nov 86 Section 1002, P.L. 99-662 $1,330,000 4,500 -- 5 Aug 77 Section 12, P.L. 93-251 STREAMBANK EROSION UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 22 of the Text) For Last Full Report Cost to Sep. 30, 1998 See Annual Operation & Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Cooper River, Pompion Hill Chapel, SC Drayton Hall, SC Pinopolis Dam, SC Santee Dam, SC Completed Completed Completed Completed 1987 1994 1996 1996 $185,000 $187,800 $431,040 $418,237 7-20 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Section 29 of Text) ITEM NAVIGATION STUDIES (CATEGORY 110) Charleston Harbor (Deepening/Widening) Georgetown Harbor SHORELINE PROTECTION (CATEGORY 130) Pawleys Island SPECIAL STUDIES (CATEGORY 140) Charleston Estuary Yadkin-Pee Dee Rivers Watershed, SC COMPREHENSIVE STUDIES (CATEGORY 150) Santee, Cooper, & Congaree Rivers REVIEW OF AUTHORIZED PROJECT (CATEGORY 160) AIWW, SC MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITIES (CATEGORY 170) Special Investigations FERC Licensing Activities Interagency Water Resources Development North American Waterfowl COORDINATION STUDIES WITH OTHER AGENCIES (CATEGORY 180) Cooperation With Other Water Resource Agencies Planning Assistance to States PAS-SC-Greenville County Flood Mapping PAS-SC-North Charleston Storm Water Management PAS-SC-Santee Cooper Aquatic Plant PAS-SC-South Carolina DNR Aerial Photo PAS-SC-Jasper County FLOOD PLAIN MGMT SERVICES (CATEGORY 250) National Flood Proofing Committee Flood Plain Management Services Technical Services Quick Responses SAC HES Restudy Post Bertha/Fran HES Restudy HES-Program Management SS-Greenville County, SC HYDROLOGIC STUDIES (CATEGORY 260) Hydrologic Studies PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING & DESIGN (CATEGORY 400) Charleston Harbor (Deepening/Widening) FISCAL YEAR COSTS $ 396 935 $ 58,172 $ 52,414 255,282 $ 91,460 $ 185,571 $ 10,891 1,981 14,115 1,366 $ 860 15,450 61 5,601 20,600 7,000 30,864 TOTAL (CATEGORY 100) $ 753,019 $ 12,397 52,767 136,111 4,952 123,302 2,911 763 56,080 TOTAL (CATEGORY 200) 3,025 $ 392,308 37,705 TOTAL GENER AI TNVERTTGATIONS 7-21 TABLE 7-I S 1.183.032 iJ i >L iiau ir c li \ L iv il~\Y Iivv~v y REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 7-J FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Preauthorization Studies (See Section 21 of Text) Study Identification Section Fiscal Year Costs Black River, Bishopville, SC 205 $ 30,405 Brushy Creek, Greenville, SC 205 9,573 Camp Branch, Lake City, SC 205 51,468 Coordination Account 205 7,182 Rocky Branch, Greenville County, SC 205 2,875 Shadowmoss Creek, Charleston, SC 205 92,485 St. Andrews Canal, Charleston County, SC 205 6,144 Turkey Creek, Berkeley County, SC 205 2,181 Turkey Creek, Sumter County, SC 205 29,699 TABLE 7-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS (See Section 19 of Text) Project Date of Inspection Battery Pringle, SC Cow Castle Creek, SC Drayton Hall, SC Eagle Creek, SC Folly Beach, SC Kingstree Branch, SC Sawmill Branch, SC Scotts Creek, SC Socastee Creek, SC Turkey Creek, SC Wilson Branch, SC April 1998 April 1998 April 1998 April 1998 April 1998 April 1998 April 1998 April 1998 April 1998 April 1998 June 1998 7-22 - - SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT * The District comprises drainage basins that flow into the Atlantic Ocean between Port Royal Sound, SC, and Cumberland Sound, GA and FL, and includes the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between these points. This area covers the headwaters of the Savannah River in southwestern North Carolina, eastern Georgia, and a small portion of northeastern Florida. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Aquatic Plant Control ........ 8-2 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA, and St. Johns River, FL (Savannah District) ... 8-2 3. Brunswick Harbor, GA ....... 8-3 4. Savannah Harbor, GA ........ 8-3 5. Savannah River Below Augusta, GA .............. 8-5 6. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ........ 7. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................. 8. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ............... Beach Erosion Control 9. Beach Erosion Control Special Authorization . . 10. Tybee Island, GA ..... .. 8-6 8-6 8-6 Work Under ...... 8-6 .. . 8-6 Flood Control 11. Savannah River Basin at Oates Creek, GA ........... 8-7 12. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............ 8-7 13. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................. 8-7 14. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .............. 8-7 Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection 15. Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection Under Special Authorization .............. 8-8 Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment 16. Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment Under Special Authorization .............. 8-8 17. Lower Savannah River Basin Environmental Restoration Study. . 8-8 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 18. Savannah River Basin, GA and SC .................... 8-8 19. J. Storm Thurmond Dam and Lake, GA and SC (Formerly Clarks Hill Lake) ................... 8-8 20. Hartwell Dam and Lake, GA and SC ................. 8-9 21. Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, GA and SC (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake, GA and SC) ..... 8-10 General Investigations 22. Planning Assistance to States. . 8-11 23. Surveys ................. 8-11 24. Collection and Study of Basic Data .................... 8-11 25. Research and Development ... 8-11 Miscellaneous 26. Flood Control and Coastal Emergency .......... 27. National Emergency Preparedness ........ 28. Regulatory Functions .. . Tables Table 8-A Cost and Financial ..... 8-11 ..... 8-11 ..... 8-11 Statement ........... 8-12 Table 8-B Authorizing Legislation .. 8-14 Table 8-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............ 8-20 Table 8-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ....... 8-21 Table 8-E Savannah River Basin, GA and SC Dams and Lakes . 8-22 8-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Savannah District. Existing project. The project provides for control of water-hyacinth, lyngbya, alligator weed, Eurasian water milfoil, and other noxious aquatic plants from navigable waters, tributary steams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interests of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes. The project provides for continued research for developing the most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with report of Chief of Engineers, H. S. 251, 89th Cong., 1st sess. The authorizing act provides that research costs shall be borne fully by the United States. (See Table 8-B for Authorizing Legislation.) The Final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with EPA on August 6, 1979, and its notice of availability appeared in the Federal Register August 17, 1979. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and participate to the extent of 50 percent of the cost of the planning and actual control operations of the program. Requirements are being met. Operations and results during FY. The Georgia Game and Fish Division, Department of Natural Resources, who maintain surveillance of potential aquatic plant problem areas, reported nuisance aquatic plant infestation in Lakes Juliette, Oliver, Jackson, Blackshear, Worth, and in Ebenezer Creek. This infestation was also found in Little Ocmulgee and George L. Smith State Parks. A work plan was prepared and submitted but was not funded due to National shortfall of funding. 2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA, AND THE ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (SAVANNAH DISTRICT) Location. This 161-mile section of waterway connects Port Royal Sound, SC, with Cumberland Sound, GA and FL. (See NOAA charts 11489-11507, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 838-841, inclusive.) Previous project. (Between Savannah, GA, and Fernandina, FL) For details see pages 1814, 1821-1823 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 585 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a waterway 12 feet deep at mean low water and not less than 90 feet wide between Port Royal Sound, SC, and Savannah, GA; 12 feet deep at mean low water, with widths of 90 feet in land cuts and narrow streams and 150 feet in open waters between Savannah, GA, and Cumberland Sound, GA and FL; and a suitable anchorage basin at Isle of Hope, GA. Mean tidal range between Port Royal, SC, and Cumberland Sound, GA and FL is from 6 to 8 feet with fluctuations from 1.5 to 2.5 feet due to winds and lunar phases. (See Table 8-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Exclusive or adequate terminal facilities at port of entry, this improvement serves numerous wharves, some of which are open to the public on equal terms. Facilities are considered ample for existing commerce. Operations and results during FY. Maintenance. The District used Wright Dredging Company dredge "Hampton Roads" and Marinex Construction Company, Inc. dredge "Clarendon" to dredge the waterway during FY 98. The dredges removed 1,076,212 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,294,055. Condition at end of FY. The main channel of the existing project, completed in 1941, is maintained at 12 feet. The former main channel, now an alternate route through the westerly end of the south channel and northerly end of Wilmington River, will be maintained to a depth of 7 feet mean low water for traffic points north and south of Savannah Harbor. Relocation of the main channel from the Frederica to Mackay Rivers near St. Simons Island, GA, was accomplished under Section 107 of the Continuing Authorities Program after construction of a new bridge for the Torras Causeway. The notice on the final Environmental Impact Statement ap- 8-2 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT peared in the Federal Register October 29, 1976. Total expenditures for the FY amounted to $1,629,109 (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Section 1135 Study. Savannah District has prepared a feasibility report recommending an Environmental Restoration project in the Latham River in order to improve water quality. 3. BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA Location. The harbor entrance is 70 statute miles south of the entrance to Savannah Harbor, GA, and 25 statute miles north of the entrance to Fernandina Harbor, FL. (See NOAA Chart 11215, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 447.) Previous projects. For details see page 1818 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 591 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a stone jetty 4,350 feet long at the entrance to East River and the following channels: 32 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the bar; 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide through St. Simons Sound, Brunswick River, and East River to the foot of Second Avenue; 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Turtle River to the Allied Chemical Company wharf, formerly the Atlantic Refining Company; 30 feet deep and 400 feet in South Brunswick River; 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide in East River from Second Avenue to its confluence with Academy Creek; 24 feet deep and 150 feet wide from St. Simons Sound to the mouth of Mill Creek; and a channel in Terry Creek 20 feet deep and 150 feet wide from St. Simons Sound to the mouth of Mill Creek; and a channel in Terry Creek 10 feet deep and 80 feet wide from its mouth to a point immediately above the wharf of the former Glynn Canning Company. All depths refer to mean low water. Mean tidal range on the bar is 6.5 feet, at the City of Brunswick 7.3, and 7.6 feet at the upper end of the harbor. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Eighteen wharves and piers, almost all privately owned, have a berthing space of 7,530 linear feet. The Port of Brunswick and the State of Georgia have a transit shed and modem docks with 1,640 feet of berthing space (three general cargo berths) on East River. For further details see Port Series No. 14, Corps of Engineers (revised 1990). Operations and results during FY. Maintenance. The District used the M Operating Company, Inc. dredge "Stuart" to dredge the East River during the first quarter of FY 98. The dredge removed 258,725 cubic yards of material at a cost of $260,183. The District used Bean Horizan Corporation during the second quarter of the FY to dredge the Bar Channel using dredge "Eagle 1". The dredge removed 859,546 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,588,276. The District prepared plans and specifications for the FY 99 Brunswick and Savannah Entrance Channel contract. Operation and Maintenance costs for the FY amounted to $2,814,984. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at end of FY. The existing project was completed in December 1960. General condition of the harbor works is satisfactory, providing maintenance dredging continues. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register October 3, 1975. Authorized depths were maintained throughout the FY. Total cost for existing completed project to September 30, 1998, is $98,071,090. New Work costs for the FY amounted to $134,144. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Feasibility Study: Savannah District has prepared a Feasibility Report with the Georgia Ports Authority recommending deepening the harbor to 36 feet. 4. SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA Location. Harbor entrance is 75 statute miles south of Charleston, SC, and 70 miles north of Brunswick Harbor, GA. (See NOAA Chart 11512, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 440.) Previous projects. For details see page 1810 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 578 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a channel 44 feet deep and 600 feet wide across the ocean bar about 7.0 miles long; 42 feet deep and 500 feet wide to the vicinity of Gar- 8-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 den City (Georgia Ports Authority terminal) and 36 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the vicinity of the Savannah Sugar Refinery of Savannah Foods and Industries, Inc., about 22.6 miles; and 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide to a point 1,500 feet below the Atlantic Coastal Highway Bridge, about 1.5 miles, a total length of 31.1 miles; Fig Island and Marsh Island Turning Basins 34 feet deep by 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long in the vicinity of the Seaboard Coast Line terminal, and American Oil Company terminal; Kings island Turning Basin 42 feet deep by 1,500 feet wide by 1,600 feet long in the vicinity of the Garden City terminal of the Georgia Ports Authority; Argyle Island and Port Wentworth Turning Basins 30 feet deep by 600 feet long near Savannah Sugar Refinery terminal and at the extreme upper limit of the project near the Continental Can Company terminal; and a 1,200 foot long by 1,050 foot wide by 40 foot deep Oyster Bed Island Turning Basin in the vicinity of Georgia Ports Authority's LASH facility. The project also provides for sediment control works consisting of a tide gate structure across Back River; a sediment basin 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide; about 2 miles long, with an entrance channel 38 to 40 feet deep and 300 feet wide; a drainage canal across Argyle Island 15 feet deep and 300 feet wide; control works and canals for supplying fresh water to the Savannah National Wildlife Refuge; and facilities to mitigate damages to presently improved areas other than refuge lands. Mean range of tide is 7.9 feet at the upper end of the harbor and 6.9 feet at the lower end. Extreme ranges are about 11.1 and 10.7 feet, respectively. The tide gate structure across Back River was taken out of operation as of March 1991 to decrease salinity levels in the wildlife refuge. The drainage canal across Argyle Island, which was part of the original tide gate project, was closed as of April 1992 by the New Cut closure contract done by a Section 1135 program. The cost of this contract was $1,531,847. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide suitable disposal areas and retaining dikes for construction and future maintenance of the project. The Chatham County Board of Commissioners, as local assurers, have met all requirements to date. However, one of the upstream disposal areas will be filled to capacity in 1999. The local sponsor has been notified that a new disposal area may be needed to restore lost capacity. Terminal facilities. Sixty-one piers and wharves adequately serve existing waterborne commerce of the port. These facilities, with use of dolphins, have a combined berthing space of 46,930 linear feet at mean low water. Included in the berthing space are six container berths with 271 acres of handling area. All have railway and highway connections. LASH facilities are located at the entrance to the harbor and have depth ranging up to 38 feet mean low water. The berthing space of LASH facilities is included in the above combined berthing space. For further details, see Port Series No. 14, Corps of Engineers (revised 1982) and Annual Report for 1990. Savannah Harbor Widening. The Savannah Harbor Widening project was awarded on 28 September 1990 for $7,735,512. The scope of work included widening of 5.6 miles of channel from 400 to 500 feet with 1.8 million cubic yards of material dredged after demolition and removal of structures in the riverbank. Chatham County, the local assurer, completed real estate acquisition prior to award expending $3,688,000 in providing LERRD's, as required by the LCA. The total Federal Cost exclusive of contract claims and additional real estate costs was $8,270,000 and the Non-Federal cost was $6,441,000. Savannah Harbor Deepening. The Savannah Harbor Deepening project was authorized by WRDA 92 on October 31, 1992. The LCA was signed with the local sponsor, the Georgia Ports Authority, on March 2, 1993. Because Federal appropriations would be no earlier than FY 95, the LCA was written and negotiated to allow the local sponsor to up-front the construction funds upon project authorization and the signing of the LCA. The first phase contracts for the Savannah Harbor Deepening project was awarded in March 1993 for the outer bar channel from Station 0 +000 to -60 + 000 and the lower inner harbor channel from Station 0+000 to 70 + 000 for $7,298,876 and $8,748,883, respectively. The second phase, that requiring significant real estate acquisition, was awarded in July 1993 from Station 70+000 to 103+000, for $4,675,376. The total project scope entails the deepening of the harbor by 4 feet, from -38 ft mlw to -42 ft mlw in the inner harbor and from -40 ft mlw to -44 ft mlw in the bar channel, for 8-4 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT a total of 31 miles of harbor improvement. Construction was initiated with the Inner Harbor contract (0 + 000 to 70 + 000) on May 1, 1993, and was completed on April 21, 1994. The authorized cost for the Savannah Harbor Deepening project is $50,050,000. The current estimated cost for the project is $28,107,635. In the FY 95 appropriations bill, Congress provided $11,585,000 as reimbursement to the local sponsor for the Federal share of the NED plan. The appropriations bill also provided the $2,083,000 of those funds be provided for the cost shared Savannah Riverwalk Extension. The PCA for the Savannah Riverwalk Extension Project was executed on July 21, 1995. The final cost estimate for the project is $3,532,499, of which the Federal share is fixed at $2,083,000 and the City of Savannah's share is $1,449,499. Work was completed as scheduled on May 24,1996 and a dedication ceremony took place on June 10, 1996. In November 1996, the Georgia Ports Authority received $7,500,000 towards their reimbursement of the Federal share of the project. The balance of the Federal share will be forwarded to the local sponsor once all of the contracts have been closed out and final audits prepared. Maintenance. In the first three quarters, the District dredged from Station 50+000 to 112+500 using the M Operating Company, Inc. dredge "Stuart", the Wright Dredging Company dredges "Enterprises" and "Hampton Roads", and the Norfolk Dredging Company dredge "Pullen" to remove 2,566,035 cubic yards of material at a cost of $3,598,286. The District dredged the Sediment Basin and Station 0 +000 to 50 + 000 using the Wright Dredging Company dredge "Enterprises" to remove 1,732,153 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,945,814. The District used Bean Horizon Corporation during the second quarter of FY 98 to dredge the Bar Channel using the dredge "Eagle 1". The dredge removed 974,648 cubic yards of material at a cost of $3,243,808. The last quarter of FY 98, the District dredged from Station 50 + 000 to 112 + 500 and Station 0 + 000B to 14+1 0OB using the Norfolk Dredging Company dredge "Pullen" to remove 1,439,959 cubic yards of material at a cost of $4,261,488. The District prepared Plans and Specifications for the FY 99 Brunswick and Savannah Entrance Channel contract. Operation and Maintenance costs for the FY amounted to $14,448,990 which included such items as water quality monitoring, project condition surveying, and cultural resources monitoring. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at the end of the FY. Training walls, jetties, and other structures are in fair condition. Authorized channels are maintained by a planned dredging program with work at critical areas when necessary. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register June 25, 1976. Notices of availability on two Final Supplements to the Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register September 25, 1978, and January 8, 1980. 5. SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA Location. Savannah River is formed by the confluence of the Tugaloo and Seneca Rivers on the boundary line between South Carolina and Georgia. It flows southeast 314 miles, forming the boundary line between two states, and empties into the Atlantic Ocean 16.6 miles below Savannah, GA. (See NOAA Charts 11514 and 11515, formerly Geological Survey maps of South Carolina and Georgia.) Previous project. For details see page 1813 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 581 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 9 feet deep and 90 feet wide (at ordinary summer flow of 5,800 secondfeet at Augusta, GA) from the upper end of the Savannah Harbor to the head of navigation at Augusta, above the 13th Street Bridge (R.M. 202.6), a total distance of about 181 miles. A lock and dam is located approximately 15 miles below the upper limit of the project at New Savannah Bluff. Improvement is to be obtained by construction of contraction works, closure of cutoffs, bank protection, dredging, removal of snags, over hanging trees and wrecks, and open-river regulation. Mean tidal variation at the mouth of the river is 7 feet. Freshet variation above the normal pool level (elevation 114.5 mean sea level) of New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam at mile 187 is ordinarily about 13 feet with an extreme of 34 feet. Due to lack of commercial use, the river has not been dredged since FY 79. Local cooperation. Complied with to date. 8-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Terminal facilities. The only water terminals served by this improvement are at Augusta, Sylvania, and at or near Savannah. Augusta provided a municipal dock valued at $50,000 and Georgia Ports Authority constructed a state port at Augusta, GA, costing about $418,000. These facilities were expanded in 1965 at an additional cost of about $250,000. These are supplemented by natural landings along the river and extensive facilities at Savannah. Operations and results during FY. In general, open-channel works are in good condition. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register February 18, 1977. Operation and Maintenance costs for the FY amounted to $1,125,318. (See Table 8- A for Cost and Financial Statement.) There were no dredging projects during this FY. 6. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Survey Section performed condition surveys on the following active O&M navigation projects: AIWW Brunswick Harbor Savannah Harbor 7. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 8-C.) 8. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION None were conducted in FY 98. Beach Erosion Control 9. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 10. TYBEE ISLAND, GA Location. Tybee island is located directly south of the Savannah River entrance, about 17 miles east of the City of Savannah, GA. (See NOAA 11512, 11513, and 11509, formerly U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Numbers 440, 1240, and 1241, and on maps included in HD 92-105, 92nd Cong.) The only portion of the island that has developed is bounded on the north by the south channel of the Savannah River, on the east by the Atlantic Ocean, and on the south and west by Tybee Creek and other small tidal streams. This area, hereinafter referred to as "Tybee Island," is occupied by the City of Tybee Island. The ocean face of this area has a wide sandy beach. Tybee Island is about 3.5 miles long from its northerly tip to the mouth of Tybee Creek with an average width of about 0.5 miles. Behind the beach lies a line of sand dunes, a number of which have been removed during the years to make room for improvements and for various other reasons. Those that remain are from 10 to 20 feet high. The ground elevation west of the dunes is from 10 to 18 feet and slopes westward to the salt marsh. Existing project. The approved project plan of improvement provides for an 800-foot rock groin at the north end of the island, with a 225-foot tie-in to high ground. An additional 1,200-foot extension of this groin is deferred, as are two additional intermediate groins (480 feet long); these will be added at a later date, if needed. The plan also provides for the initial restoration of approximately 13,300 feet of beach, from the vicinity of 18th Street to the terminal groin located at the northern end of the island. Periodic nourishment will be provided as needed to maintain suitable beach dimensions. In 1981, the plan was modified to call for the addition of a groin at the south end and modification and rehabilitation of the north rock groin and renourishment. Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) contribute in cash the required percentage of the first cost (including costs for construction, engineering and design, and administration; and excluding the cost of lands, easements, rightsof- way and relocation) of all items of work to be provided by the Corps of Engineers. The local contribution is presently estimated at 38.0 percent to be paid in a lump sum prior to start of construction or in installments prior to the start of pertinent work items in accordance with construction schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers, the final apportionment of cost to be made after the actual costs have been determined; (b) provide maintenance and repair of the groins, and provide (after the first 10 years of project life) periodic nourishment of the restored beach as may be required to serve the intended purpose during the life of the project; (c) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements rights-of-way, and relocations required for construction and subsequent nourishment of the project; (e) control water pollution 8-6 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (f) provide without cost to the United States access and facilities necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based, and maintain continued public use of the beach and administer it for public use during the life of the project, and provide further the construction on the project shall not be started until local interests furnish lands for beach access and parking, satisfactory to the Chief of Engineers, for the reach from First Street to the terminal groin. To date, local cooperation is being provided as required. Condition at the end of the FY. In January 1987, the South Groin contract was completed at a cost of $607,392. In February 1987, the first periodic renourishment contract was awarded, calling for the placement of approximately 1 million cubic yards of sand on two reaches of the island; the south end from the mouth of Tybee Creek to 14th Street, and the north end from the North terminal groin to about 6th Street. The contract was completed in May 1987, at a contract cost of $1,988,843. A Beach Monitoring Program was performed for three years to monitor the performance of the design. The Local Sponsor has invested over $200,000 in additional funds for the implementation of a dune building program for the North and South ends of the island. New Work costs for the FY amounted to $513,911. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) A reevaluation study under Section 934 WRDA 86 was initiated in 1990 for the Tybee Island Beach Erosion Control Project. The purpose of the study was to determine if the authorized Tybee Island Beach Erosion Control Project should be extended to a project life of 50 years, and determine if the Federal Government should continue to participate in the project. The study used current Federal policy and economic guidelines to evaluate the economic and environmental feasibility of additional periodic beach nourishment. The study was completed in October 1994. Approval of the report authorized continued Federal participation in the project for the remainder of the project's 50-year life and was approved in June 1995. $2.500 million of FY 97 funds have been appropriated for a 1997 Tybee Island Beach Renourishment project. A study to determine if the South Tip of the island and the Back River area up to Horse Pen Creek should be added to the authorized project was completed in November 1997 and was approved by Headquarters in August 1998. FLOOD CONTROL 11. SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN AT OATES CREEK, GA Oates Creek is a major drainage outlet for flood water from an urban area of Augusta, GA. A flood control study of Oates Creek was authorized and completed as part of the Savannah River Basin study. The Oates Creek study area is located just south of Augusta, in Richmond County. The revised FEMA mapping has been prepared in order to reduce the flood insurance costs of the inhabitants of the Oates Creek Basin. The Operation and Maintenance manual was completed in December 1993 and the project was turned over to Richmond County for long term maintenance. For more details, see Annual Report for FY 1995. 12. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Expenditures for the FY amounted to $118,068. (See Table 8-A&D.) 13. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 8-D) 14. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION These Flood Damage Reduction activities are accomplished under the authority of Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948 (Public Law 858, 80th Congress) as amended. During FY 98 a total of $192,624 was spent on preauthorization flood damage reduction studies. Study efforts during the FY were as follows: Ocmulgee River Levee, Macon, GA: $6,418; and Harmon Canal: $187,206. Flood Damage Reduction studies are also conducted under the General Investigations Program. During FY 98, a total of $83,639 was spent on these studies. 8-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection 15. EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION During FY 98, a Section 14 study for Log Landing Road, a public road in Effingham County, was completed. No Federal interest was found. During FY 98, a total of $6,173 was spent on this study. Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment 16. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION These project modifications are accomplished under the authority of Section 1135, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662) as amended. Environmental modification study efforts during FY 98 were as follows: Latham River/Jekyll Island, GA: $30,902; Ebenezer Creek Swamp, GA: $36,394; and Back River Restoration, GA: $10,919. A Preliminary Restoration Plan (PRP) was approved for Ebenezer Creek and and preparation of an Environmental Restoration Report initiated. Project Modification Report being prepared for Latham River/Jekyll Creek to determine environmental benefits at a cost of $800,000. Additional PRP's were prepared for strip bass restoration of Back River Savannah Harbor and DO increases below J. Strom Thurmond Dam. 17. LOWER SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION STUDY The cost shared Feasibility Phase was initiated June 1993 and completed in March 1996. Recommended plan includes a large partial diversion structure at cut #3, a plug in bend #3 below the mouth of Bear Creek, a realignment and restoration of the mouths of Bear and Mill Creeks, which provides improved flows into both creeks. This is a self sustaining project which would not require O&M dredging. This plan has no impact on navigation. The feasibility phase included a takings analysis which concluded no takings. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design (PED) was initiated in April 1996 and was completed in September 1998. The total cost of PED phase is $547,000. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 18. SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN, GA AND SC Location. Works covered by this project consist of a series of 11 dams and lakes on the Savannah River and its tributaries in GA and SC. (See Geological Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1944 approved the general plan for comprehensive development of the Savannah River basin for flood control and other purposes (HD/657, 78th Cong., 2d sess.) and authorized construction of the J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir Project on the Savannah River in Georgia and South Carolina as the initial step of this development. The Flood Control Act of 1950 authorized construction of the Hartwell Lake under the general plan. Richard B. Russell (formerly Trotters Shoals) was authorized for construction by the Flood control Act of 1966 at an estimated cost of $84,900,000. J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, Hartwell Lake, and Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake are the only projects in the comprehensive plan that have been constructed. (See Table 8-E on Dams and Lakes.) Duke Power company has completed construction on the Keowee-Toxaway power complex on the Keowee River in the headwaters of Hartwell Lake and construction of the Jacassee pumpstorage power project in the headwaters of the Keowee-Toxaway project. The Keowee-Toxaway power complex is located on the Newry-Old Pickens site identified in the approved comprehensive plan. Individual reports on J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, Hartwell, and Richard B. Russell Lakes follow. A new authorization for a comprehensive water resources study of the Savannah River Basin was authorized in Section 414 of the WRDA 1996. A Reconnaissance Study was begun under this study in February 1998. Local cooperation. None required. 19. J. STROM THURMOND DAM AND LAKE, GA AND SC (Formerly Clarks Hill Lake) Location. J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Lake is located at mile 237.7 on the Savannah River about 22 miles upstream from Augusta, GA. (See Geological Survey maps of GA and SC.) 8-8 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, the final cost of which was $79,156,300. The dam has a concrete section 2,282 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet and a controlled spillway 1,096 feet long. The concrete section is flanked on the west side by a rolled-earth embankment of 2,069 feet and on the east side by a similar embankment of 1,329 feet. The total length of the dam is 5,680 feet. The lake covers 71,100 acres at maximum power pool elevation 330 msl. It provides a total storage capacity of 2,900,000 acre-feet allocated as follows: flood control 390,000 acrefeet; hydropower 1,045,000 acre-feet; dead storage 1,465,000 acre-feet. Seven 40,000- kilowatt generators have a combined generating capacity of 282,000 kilowatts with an average annual output of 700 million kilowatt-hours of electrical energy. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during FY. Net generations of electric energy for the period was 1,065,723 kilowatt-hours, most of which was delivered to the Southeastern Power Administration. Cumulative flood damage prevented through FY 98 was $29,372,744. Maintenance. Operation and Maintenance costs for the FY amounted to $8,692,823. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) The notice of availability on the Final Environmental Impact Statement on J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir Operation and Maintenance appeared in the December 18, 1981 Federal Register. In FY 98 6,631,950 persons visited the facility. Condition at the end of the FY. Construction is complete except for providing additional recreational development. Major Rehabilitation. The J. Strom Thurmond Powerplant has been identified as a project for the Major Rehabilitation Program. An Evaluation Report was approved in July 1994. FY 96 Appropriations were provided in the FY 96 Energy and Water Bill in November 1996. Current estimate is $69,700,000. Seven of the eight contracts have been awarded, including the Generator Rewind Contract ($10,271,000) and the Turbine Replacement Contract ($17,662,500). One remaining contract to be awarded in FY 99 will be for the Installation of the Transformers. Current project cost estimate remains at $69,700,000. Project completion date remains at April 2004. New Work costs for the FY amounted to $2,511,084. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 20. HARTWELL DAM AND LAKE, GA AND SC Location. Hartwell Dam and Lake is on the Savannah River 305 miles above its mouth and 89 miles upstream from Augusta, GA (See Geological Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The dam is a concrete gravitytype structure 1,900 feet long with a maximum height of 204 feet and a controlled spillway 480 feet in length. The concrete section is flanked on the east and west abutments by earth embankments totaling 13,360 feet in length and by a saddle dike 2,590 feet long also on the west side. Total length of the dam is 17,850 feet. At maximum conservation pool elevation of 660 feet the lake covers 55,950 acres. Total capacity of the lake is 2,843,000 acre-feet of storage allocated as follows: flood control - 293,000 acre-feet; hydropower - 1,416,000 acre-feet; dead storage - 1,134,000 acre-feet. Four 66,000 kilowatt generators having a generating capacity of 264,000 kilowatts were installed initially with provisions for a future unit. A fifth 80,000 kilowatt generating unit has been installed which increased the rated capacity to 344,000 kilowatts. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during the FY. Net generation of electrical energy for the period amounted to 650,202,500 kilowatt-hours, most of which was delivered to the Southeastern Power Administration. Cumulative flood damage prevented through FY 98 is $13,729,334. Maintenance. Operation and Maintenance costs for the FY amounted to $9,891,592. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement on the operation and maintenance of Hartwell Dam and Lake appeared in the Federal Register on August 21, 1978. Approximately 10,147,200 persons visited the lake in FY 98. During FY 96 funds were expended for the E&D phase of the major rehabilitation of the four original units at the Hartwell power facility. 8-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Major Rehabilitation. The Hartwell Powerplant Major Rehabilitation project was approved by HQUSACE, and was included in the FY 96 budget. The project scope includes the rewinding of the first four generators, the replacement of the transformers, the refurbishment of the turbine water passageways, and the replacement of key electrical/mechanical peripheral equipment. The fully funded cost for the recommended plan is $22,300,000. The main rewind and turbine refurbishment contract was awarded July 3, 1996. The Circuit breaker contract was awarded June 14, 1996. The first unit went off line in March 1997. Currently scheduled for completion March 2000. New Work costs for the FY amounted to $4,541,634. 21. RICHARD B. RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA ANn SC (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake, GA and SC) Location. Richard B. Russell Dam is located on the Savannah River 275.1 miles above its mouth, 29.9 miles below Hartwell Dam, and about 37.4 miles above J. Strom Thurmond Dam (formerly Clarks Hill Dam). (See NOAA Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake substantially in accordance with the recommendations. The latest approved (FY 98) cost estimate for the project is $620,000,000 of which $466,969,000 is for construction; $28,857,000 for lands and damages; $4,880,000 for cultural resources; and $124,174,000 for engineering/design, supervision/ administration, and all project studies including environmental. Approval was received in January 1977 to include minimum provisions for pumped storage. A Feasibility Report and Final Environmental Impact Statement to address the installation and operation of four 75 MW reversible pump-turbines were prepared in 1979 with the Record of Decision signed in August 1980. The Richard B. Russell Fish and Wildlife Mitigation Plan was completed in 1981, approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) in September 1982, and the provisions are being implemented. Since 1986, the District has conducted comprehensive fishery studies in the Russell tailrace and J. Strom Thurmond Lake (formerly Clarks Hill Lake) downstream. In addition, the District conducted water quality studies, hydraulic modeling, and an evaluation of various fish protection measures associated with hydroelectric projects. The results of these study efforts have been used to evaluate the need to develop fish protection at the Richard B. Russell Project associated with pumped storage operations. This evaluation is presented in a supplement to the final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on pumped storage. The Record-of- Decision (ROD) was signed September 1991. Installation of pumped storage is complete; final Phase III environmental testing was completed in October 1996. The Phase III Environmental Report and its Interagency Review was completed in August 1997. The District has completed the NEPA Documentation Phase and has also completed discussions with the resource agencies in attempting to resolve issues. SAS has reached an agreement with SCDNR on operational measures and general mitigation package. The Federal Court injunction is still in place prohibiting commercial operation of pumped storage. The only remaining issue is SC has insisted on a consent order for commercial operations. COE cannot accept this condition and is attempting to resolve this with a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) in addition to the NEPA Documentation. If the District cannot resolve this issue with SCDNR, then it will be litigated in Federal Court to lift the injunction. All cost shared recreation is complete except for work planned in the McCalla Peninsula with SC in FY 2000 and FY 2001. Local cooperation. Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Public Law 89-72; 79 stat. 213C (for Legislative history of Act see page 1864). Operations and results during FY. Net generations of electric energy for the period was 652,117 megawatt-hours. Maintenance. Operation and Maintenance costs for the FY amounted to $5,823,005. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) These funds were for management of lake and power activities. (See Table 8 for Cost and Financial Statement.) Approximately 1,056,288 persons visited the lake in FY 98. Condition at the end of FY. The project is 96 percent complete. 8-10 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT Total cost of project to September 30, 1998, is $687,711,045. New Work costs for the FY amounted to $3,622,062. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) General Investigation. 22. PLANNING ASSISTANCE TO STATES Planning Assistance to States activities are accomplished under the authority of Section 22, Water Resources Development Act of 1974, as amended. During FY 98, a total of $111,410 was expended. 23. SURVEYS During FY 98, costs of $460,532 were incurred as follows: Navigation Studies: $290,376; Flood Damage Prevention Studies: $83,639; Special Studies: $0; and Miscellaneous Activities: $86,517. 24. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During FY 98, under the Flood Plain Management Services Program, flood hazard related information and assistance were provided to state and local governments on a nonreimbursable basis and to other Federal agencies and private persons on a cost recovery basis. Expenditures were as follows: Flood Plain Management Services: $57,174; Technical Services: $65,983; Quick Responses: $4,972; for three Special Studies: $69,584; Georgia HES Restudy: $119,897; and Hydrologic Studies: $9,060. 25. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT No funds were expended for research and development during the fiscal year. Miscellaneous. 26. FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCY Emergency Work for Others: California Flood 1997 Tech Review/Debris Contracts Alabama Flood, March 1998 ESF 3 Tallahassee, FL Fires PRT Training Hurricane Bonnie Tropical Storm Charley/ Temp Housing PRT TOTAL FC&CE National Preparedness 28. REGULATORY FUNCTIONS Permit Evaluation Enforcement Studies Other Navigation Regulations EIS Total Regulatory Expenditure $ 12,000 4,000 6,000 13,500 3,500 19,200 60,000 $567,700 Disaster Preparedness Emergency Operations (Code 210) Advance Contracts Advance Temp Housing Planning March 1998 Georgia Flood Hurricane Bonnie 27. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS/ CATASTROPHIC DISASTER PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM $ 50,000 $2,155,021 614,657 1,450 19,858 2,209 $2,793,196 $ 358,000 5,500 32,000 46,000 8,000 8-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 8-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to In Text Project Funding FY-95 FY-96 FY-97 FY-98 Sep 30, 1998 1. Aquatic Plant Control (1965 R&H Act) 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA, and the St. Johns River, FL 3. Brunswick Harbor, GA (Contributed Funds) 4. Savannah Harbor, GA (Contributed Funds) 5. Savannah River below Augusta, GA 10. Tybee Island, GA (Contributed Funds) 11. Savannah River Basin at Oates Creek, GA (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 32,000 24,366 2,324,000 2.342.397 132,000 135,398 3,160,000 3,175,711 450,000 100,000 11,787,000 8,055,639 8,444,000 8,580,793 -7,390,400 -6,468,694 600,000 637,975 25,000 27,143 4,842 40,114 1,040,159 20,111 1,003,961 1,659,000 942,000 1,569,739 1,041,826 300,000 302,000 243,993 243,993 3,475,000 3,384,000 3,398,544 3,458,485 -- 302,000 227,404 355,081 566,000 2,264,033 14,333,000 14,092,569 -263,694 1,897,773 273,000 160,068 11,478,000 11,580,374 -65,951 5,988 2,392,000 2,574,000 1,677,663 2,599,254 -- 966,000 2,858 353,876 1,631,000 1,629,109 106,000 134,144 3,975,000 2,814,984 88,000 154,586 14,000 156,232 14,458,000 14,448,990 553,000 1,125,318 2,000,000 513,911 488 958,096(1) 958,096(1) 32,670,507(2) 32,663,226(2) 5,428,608(3) 5,684,952(3) 93,690,928(4) 92,386,138(4) 67,364,721(5) 66,628,234(5) 239,097,693(6) 239,191,057(6) 24,682,032 23,429,519 6,790,031(7) 6,790,031(7) 24,680,771 24,532,172 7,651,249(8) 5,552,589(8) 20,430 20,430 9,173,000 9,159,144 296,534 -- 30,706 296,534 8-12 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to In Text Project Funding FY-95 FY-96 FY-97 FY-98 Sep 30, 1998 12. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects 19. J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Lake, GA and SC (Formerly Clarks Hill Lake) 20. Hartwell Dam and Lake, GA and SC 21. Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, GA and SC (Formerly Trotters Shoals) (Contributed Funds) Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 39,000 30,000 119,000 48,747 28,581 83,590 139,000 118,068 -- -- -- -- 84,880,940(9) -- -- -- -- 84,876,004(9) 8,161,100 7,960,100 9,073,000 9,199,000 168,180,345(10) 8,231,618 7,901,320 9,087,385 8,692,823 167,260,695(10) -- 690,000 4,155,000 6,330,000 11,175,000 -- 635,847 3,241,306 2,511,084 6,388,237 ---- -- -- 115,874,985(11,12) ---- -- -- 115,876,925(11,12) 8,540,000 9,065,000 10,004,000 9,874,000 161,599,627(13) 8,803,009 8,769,746 9,597,029 9,891,592 161,554,481(13) -- 908,000 5,425,000 7,067,000 -- 782,684 4,528,120 4,541,634 18,545,000 11,103,000 5,395,000 3,757,000 19,398,075 12,257,080 5,425,293 3,622,062 5,820,100 6,916,000 6,448,000 6,304,000 5,852,098 6,344,213 6,763,933 5,823,005 1,109 4,109 1. Includes $194,497 for previous projects. 2. Includes $134,789 for previous projects. Does not include $35,000 appropriated but unexpended of contributed funds in FY's 86 and 87. 3. Includes $643,456 for previous projects and $97,521 expended from Public Works Funds for existing project. Does not include $10,000 contributed funds. 4. Includes $54,414 for previous projects, $4,995 expended from Public Works Funds for existing project, and $2,150,000 under 1983 Job Bill Act. Does not include contributed funds by Brunswick and Georgia Port Authority. 5. Includes $7,260,384 for previous projects. Does not include $46,847 for removal of sunken vessels or contributed funds. 6. Includes $298,894 for previous projects and $62,727 contributed funds. 7. Includes $93,480 for previous projects and $1,634,562 from Public Works Fund. 20,066,950 16,492,974 621,041,000 619,233,636 60,074,991 68,477,409 73,341 73,605 8. Does not include $61,856.45 contributed funds. 9. Does not include $395,634 accelerated Public Works Funds. Includes $4,558,613 appropriated under Code 710. Also includes $1,000,000 expended under the 1983 Job Bill Act. 10. Includes $576,665 under special recreation use fees and $736,000 under the 1983 Job Bill Act. 11. Includes $17,515,000 appropriated for construction of 5th Unit of which $17,469,002 has been expended. 12. Does not include $276,200 accelerated Public Works Funds. Includes $ 4,861,000 appropriated under Code 710 of which $4,851,306 has been expended and $545,000 expended under the 1983 Job Bill Act. 13. Includes $797,558 expended special recreation use fees. 8-13 728,064 671,040 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 Section 302 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1899 July 13, 1892 Mar. 3, 1905 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 26, 1937 June 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 15, 1981 1. 2. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (R&H ACT 1962) Provides for control and progressive eradication of noxious aquatic plant growths. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BEBETWEEN NORFOLK, VA, AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (SAVANNAH DISTRICT) Section from Beaufort, SC, to Savannah, GA Route No. 2 adopted. Route No. 1 adopted. Section from Savannah, GA, to Fernandina, FL. Original 7-foot channel. Provided for Skidaway Narrows. Incorporated alternative routes previously improved as separate projects and the auxiliary channels. Section from Cumberland Sound, GA and FL to St. Johns River, FL. Consolidation of the 3 sections shown above, into "Waterway between Beaufort SC, and St. Johns River, FL." Section from Beaufort, SC to Cumberland Sound GA and FL. Removing logs and snags from Generals Cut. Improving Back River to provide a channel 7 feet deep and 150 wide. Channel 75 feet wide between Beaufort, SC, and Savannah, GA. Channel from Baileys Cut to Dover Creek. A 7-foot protected channel around St. Andrews Sound. A 12-foot channel between Beaufort, SC, and Savannah, GA, via Beaufort River and Port Royal Sound. A 12-foot channel between Savannah, GA, and Fernandina, FL, various cutoffs; and anchorage basin at Thunderbolt, GA. An alternate route 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide in that part of Frederica River, GA, not now traversed by the main route, at no additional cost to the United States. Main channel relocated from Frederica River to Mackay River in the vicinity of Torras Causeway. Navigation Project. 8-14 HD251, 89th Cong., 1st sess. HD295, 53d Cong., 3d sess. HD295, 53d, Cong., 3d sess. HD41, 52d Cong., 1st sess. HD450, 58th Cong., 2d sess. HD1236, 60th, Cong., 2d sess. HD581, 63d Cong., 2d sess. HD1391, 62d Cong., 3d sess. SD178, 68th Cong., 2d sess. SD43, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Senate committee print, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc 6, 75th Cong.,3d sess. HD618, 75th Cong., 3d sess. HD114, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under the Small Navigation Project Authority, Sec. 107, PL 86-645 as amended. SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1879 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar 2, 1919 July 3, 1930 July 3, 1930 June 20, 1938 May 17, 1950 Oct. 22, 1976 July 14, 1981 July 13, 1983 Oct. 17, 1986 3. BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA Construction of East River jetty. Channels in the inner and outer harbors of 30-foot depth at mean high water, with widths varying from 150 feet in Academy Creek to 400 feet across the outer bar, extension of training wall in East River and construction of two spur dikes. Channels 27 feet deep at mean low water over the bar and at Brunswick point; and 24 feet deep at mean low water in the inner harbor and provides for a cut from Academy Creek to Turtle River, if deemed advisable. A channel in Back River 230 feet deep and 150 feet wide. Increased Channel dimensions of the bar, Brunswick Point, East River, and Turtle River, as given in the then existing project. A 10-foot channel in Terry Creek. Increased channel dimensions of the bar, St. Simons Sound, Brunswick River, East River, and Turtle River, as given in the existing project. Provides for Phase I AE&D studies for deepening portions of existing harbor (East River and Entrance Channel) and for provision of a navigation channel to Colonels Island. Enlargement of the maneuvering area of the entrance to East River and dredging Brunswick and Turtle Rivers to obtain depths authorized by the Rivers and Harbors Act of May 17, 1950. Enlargement of the East River Turning Basin to a length of 1,000 feet and a width of 750 feet. Incorporated Georgia Port Authority's 30 foot deep by 300 foot wide by 8000 foot channel in South Brunswick River serving Colonel's Island into Brunswick Harbor Navigation Project. 8-15 Annual Report, 1980, p.959. HD407, 59th Cong., 1st sess. HD393, 64th Cong., 1st sess. SD57, 71st Cong., 2d sess. SD132, 71st Cong., 2d sess. HD690, 75th Cong., 3d sess. HD110, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Report of Chief of Engineers dated Aug. 18, 1976. HD177, 97th Cong., 1st sess. PL 98-360 HR6, 99th Cong., 2d sess., Section 846 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Jan. 21, 1927 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Nov. 7, 1945 July 24, 1946 4. SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA Tentative provisions for a 26-foot channel from the Quarantine Station to the Seaboard Air Line Railway Bridge. Definite provision for the 26-foot channel. A 21-foot channel from the Seaboard Air Line Railway Bridge to the foot of Kings Island. A 30-foot depth from the sea to the Quarantine Station. A 21-foot channel above Kings Island. Channel 30 feet deep, with general width 50 feet, from the ocean to the Quarantine Station, thence 26 feet deep, general width 400 feet, to the Seaboard Air Line Rho. Bridge, thence 21 feet deep and 300 feet wide to Kings Island. Widening at West Broad and Barnard Streets; anchorage basin; mooring dolphins; regulating dam across South Channel; relocation of the Inland Waterway; dredging Drakes Cut to 13 feet; widening to 525 ft. at Kings Island; extension of training walls, revetments, and jetties. Consolidation of projects relating to Savannah Harbor. Channel 26 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the Seaboard Air Line Rho. Bridge to the foot of Kings Island. Authorized the 30-foot project and eliminated from the project (a) the relating dam across South Channel; (b) the relocation of the Inland waterway; and (c) the further extension of training walls, revetments, and jetties. Deepening the channel and turning basin above the Seaboard Air Line Rho. Bridge from 26 to 30 feet and widening the channel opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals to a maximum of 550 feet for a length of 5,000 feet. Deepening the channels to 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar; 34 feet deep and generally 400 feet wide increased to 550 feet opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals, with a turning basin 34 feet deep at the Mexican Petroleum Corp. Refinery; and with such modifications thereof as the Secretary of War and the Chief of Engineers may consider desirable. Extending channel 30 feet deep, 200 feet wide upstream from Atlantic Creosoting Terminal to a point 1,500 feet below the Atlantic Coastal Highway Bridge, with turning basin 30 feet deep at at upper end. 8-16 HD181, 59th Cong., 1st sess. HD563, 62d, Cong., 2d sess. HD1471, 64th Cong., 2d sess. HD261,69th Cong., 1st sess. HD262,69th Cong., 1st sess. SD39, 71st Cong., 1st sess. HD276, 73d Cong., 2d sess. HD283, 76th Cong., 1st sess. HD227, 79th Cong., 1st sess. HD678, 79th Cong., 2d sess. SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct 27, 1965 SPCW Resolution June 15, 1976 and HPWTC of June 9, 1976 under authority of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965 Deepening the channel to 34 feet and widening to 400 feet from the upper end of the presently authorized 34-foot channel in the vicinity of the American Oil Company Refinery wharf, to the Savannah Sugar Refinery Corp. with a turning basin at the upper end of the proposed improvement made by widening the channel to 600 feet for a length of 700 feet and providing approaches. Enlargement of turning basin near Kings Island to a width of 900 feet and a length of 1,000 feet, with suitable approaches, at a depth of 34 feet. Deepening the bar channel from 36 feet to 40 feet, the channel between the bar channel and Garden City Terminal from 34 feet to 38 feet, and the channel from the Garden City Terminal to the vicinity of the Savannah Sugar Refining Corp., from 30 feet to 36 feet; widening the bar channel from 500 feet to 600 feet, the channel between Fort Pulaski and the Atlantic Coast Line Terminal from 400 feet to 500 feet, and the channel between Garden City Terminal and the Savannah Sugar Refinery Corp., from 200 feet to 400 feet; providing necessary wideners of the bends; constructing a new turning basin 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long by 34 feet deep opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals; and enlargement of existing turning basin at the American Oil Company Terminal from 600 feet wide by 600 feet long to 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long. Providing sediment control works consisting of tide gate structure across Back River; sediment basin 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide about 2 miles long, with entrance channel 38 to 40 feet deep and 300 feet wide; control works and canals for supplying fresh water to Savannah National Wildlife Refuge; and facilities to mitigate damages to presently improved areas other than refuge lands. Provided for modification of the existing project to include (1) incorporation of the LASH Turning Basin as an element of the existing Federal navigation project for maintenance purposes, (2) enlargement of Kings Island Turning Basin to 1,500 feet by 38 feet. HD110, 83d Cong., 1st sess. SD115, 87th Cong., 1st sess. HD226, 89th Cong., 1st sess. HD223, 89th Cong., 1st sess. HD94-520, 94th Cong. dated June 8, 1976. 8-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents July 16,1984 Oct. 17, 1986 Oct. 31, 1992 5. Sep. 13, 1891 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 10. SPWC Resolution June 22, 1971, HPWC of June 23, 1972 under authority of Sec. 201 of FC Act of 1965 Oct. 17, 1986 PL-104-303 Water Resources Development Act of 1996, Oct 12, 1996 Construction of three new work curve wideners in the inner harbor channel. Curve Widener #1 is between mile 11.1 and 11.9. Curve widener #2 is between mile 13.2 and 13.8 and curve widener #3 is between mile 14.0 and 14.8. The Wideners are located on the north side of the channel. Savannah Harbor Widening as described in Report of Chief of Engineers date Dec. 19, 1978. Widen channel from 400 feet to 500 feet between Kings Island turning Basin and Fig Island Turning Basin. Allows planning, engineering and design to remove drift and debris as part of operations and maintenance. Savannah Harbor Deepening deepened harbor from -38 feet to -42 feet mlw in Inner Harbor and from - 40 feet to -44 feet mlw in the Bar Channel for a total of 31 miles of harbor improvements. SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA For a 5-foot channel Special improvement by bank protection work of 20 to 25 miles of the river immediately below Augusta. The present 6-foot channel project and Lock and Dam, GA. Provision made for locating the lock and dam at New Savannah Bluff. Conditions of local cooperation modified. Provides for a 9-foot channel. TYBEE ISLAND, GA Project will provide for beach erosion control, consisting of beach restoration, groin nourishment. Extends authority for renourishment with Federal participation from 15 to 50 years. Sect 301(b)(4) provided for inclusion of that portion of Tybee Island located south of the existing terminal groin, including the East Bank of Tybee Creek up to Horse Pen Creek. Sect 506(a)(4) extended periodic nourishment for a period of 50 years beginning on the date of initiation of construction. PL 98-360 HD6, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Dated Oct. 17, 1986, Section 201 Section 867 WRDA 1992 HD255, 51st Cong., 2d sess. HD962, 60th Cong., 1st sess. HD101, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Senate Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Corn., Doc. 39, 75th Cong., 1st sess. SD6, 81st Cong., 1st sess. HD105, 92d Cong. HR6, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Dated Oct. 17, 1986, Section 867 WRDA 1996 WRDA 1996 8-18 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 11. 17. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Oct. 17, 1986 PL-104-303 Water Resources Act 1996, Oct 12, 1996 19. Flood Control Act of Dec. 22, 1944 Oct. 17, 1986 Jan. 1988 20. Flood Control Act of May 17, 1950. Flood Control Act of July 3, 1958. Water Resources Development Act of 1976. 21. Flood Control Act of Nov. 7, 1966. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 OATES CREEK, GA Provided for construction of the Oates Creek Project. LOWER SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN, GA & SC Project for the environmental restoration of the Lower Savannah River Basin; modification to cut off Bend No. 3 and improve the mouths of Bear Creek and Mill Creek. J. STROM THURMOND DAM AND LAKE, GA&SC Approved the general plan for the comprehensive development of the Savannah River Basin and provided for construction of the Project. Recreation and fish and wildlife added as name changed. (Formerly Clarks Hill Lake.) HARTWELL LAKE, GA AND SC Provided for construction of Hartwell Project. Provided for the completion of the Hartwell Project. Provides for installation of 5th unit. RICHARD B. RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA & SC Provided for construction of the Trotters Shoals Project. Authorized mitigation plan. HR6, 99th Cong., 2d sess. dated Oct. 17, 1986, Section 401 HD105-173, 105th Congress, 2nd Session, Jan 27, 1998 HD657, 78th Cong., 2d sess. HR6, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Section 864, HJR 376 HD657, 78th Cong., 2d sess. PL516, 82st Cong., 2d sess. PL85-500, 87th Cong., 2d sess. PL94-587, Sec. 182b., 85th Cong. SD52, 89th Cong., 1st sess. HR6, 99th Cong., 2d sess. dated Oct. 17, 1986, Section 601 8-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 8-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 7 in text) Cost to September 30, 1997 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Bellville Point, GA Cedar Point, GA Darien Harbor, GA Fancy Bluff Creek, GA 1 St. Mary's River, GA and FL, and North River, GA Sapelo Harbor, GA 2, 3 Satilla River, GA 1, 5, 6 Savannah River above Augusta, GA 2, 3, 4 Savannah River at Augusta, GA 2, 3, 5 Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed See Notes See Notes 1986 1982 1975 1935 1951 1929 1951 1929 1929 599,379 656,233 199,723 8,000 15,688 17,906 9,452 69,600 200,556 185,433 7,200 69,936 19,594 57,172 85,944 17,444 1. Channel adequate for commerce. 2. Project recommended for abandonment in H.D. 467, 69th Cong., 1st session. 3. No commerce reported. 4. About 84 percent completed. Owing to construction of two power dams which submerged much of the work under the present and former projects, this improvement cannot be completed as originally planned. 5. Excludes $185,000 contributed funds ($172,151 for construction and $12,849 for operation and maintenance). 6. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized demonstration project on the Umbrella Creek - Dover Creek for the purpose of reducing shoaling. Monitor for 10 years, develop a hydrodynamic model. 8-20 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL (See Section 13 in text) PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1997 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Augusta, Savannah River, GA Curry Creek Dam and Lake, GA (1) Dunn Branch, Woodbine, Camden County, GA Macon, GA Oates Creek, GA (2) Peacock Creek, Liberty County, GA Completed See Note Completed Completed Completed Completed 1941 1974 1977 1955 1993 1976 $ 643,016 132,640 380,043 12,565,000 582,163 1. Feasibility report completed. Project not authorized for construction. 2. Authorized by HR 6, Water Resource Development Act of 1986 dated October 17, 1986. First Federal cost of $9,600,000 and non-federal cost of $4,100,000. 8-21 $38,242 5,219 38,243 5,219 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN, GA AND SC DAMS AND LAKES (See Section 19, 20, & 21 in text) Estimated Cost Name River Federal Non-Federal Total J. Strom Thurmond Dam & Lake, GA and SC Hartwell Dam & Lake, GA and SC Richard B. Russell Dam & Lake, GA and SC(4)(5) Savannah $79,156,000(3) Savannah Savannah 89,240,000 596,252,000 $79,156,000(1,3) 89,240,000(2) 596,252,000 Final Cost. (Excludes $127,000 for preauthorization study.) Approved August 1963. (Excludes $73,000 for preauthorization study.) Approved July 1954. Excludes Code 710 funds. Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake (formerly Trotters Shoals Lake) replaced Goat Island, GA and SC and Middleton Shoals, GA and SC. 8-22 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. TABLE 8-E JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT * JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT With the exception of a small area in the north-eastern section of Florida, this district comprises a portion of south-central Georgia and all of peninsular Florida, embracing the watersheds tributary to the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico from, and including the harbor at Fernandina, Florida, to and including the Aucilla River. It also includes Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) ............ 3 2. Arecibo Harbor, PR ................................... .. 3 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL ..................... 3 4. Bakers Haulover Inlet, FL ...................................... 4 5. Canaveral Harbor, FL ............................................. 4 6. Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass .............. 5 7. Charlotte Harbor, FL ............................................ 5 8. Cross Florida Barge Canal ................................... 6 9. Eau Gallie Harbor, FL ..................................... 6 10. Fernandina Harbor, FL .................................... 6 11. Fort Myers Beach, FL .................................... 7 12. Fort Pierce Harbor, FL .................................... 7 13. Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, FL ................................. 8 14. Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, FL ...................... ........ 9 15. Jacksonville Harbor, FL .................................... 9 16. Jacksonville Harbor (Mill Cove), FL ................ 10 17. John's Pass, FL ........................................ 11 18. Longboat Pass, FL .................................... 11 19. Manatee Harbor, FL ................... ..................... 12 20. Mayaguez Harbor, PR ..................................... 12 21. Melbourne Harbor, FL ..................................... 13 22. Miami Harbor.................................. 13 23. New Pass, Sarasota, FL .................................... 14 24. Okeechobee Waterway, FL .............................. 14 25. Oklawaha River, FL.............................................. 15 26. Palm Beach Harbor, FL .................................... 15 27. Palm Valley Bridge, FL..................................... 16 28. Ponce de Leon Inlet, FL .................................... 16 29. Ponce Harbor, PR .................................... 16 30. Port Everglades Harbor, FL .............................. 17 31. Removal of Aquatic Growth from Navigable Waters in the State of Florida .......................... 18 32. St. Augustine Harbor, FL ................................. 18 33. St. Johns River, Jacksonville to Lake Harney, FL ..................................... 19 34. St. Lucie Inlet, FL ............................................. 19 35. San Juan Harbor, PR ............................................ 20 36. Tampa Harbor, FL ..................................... 21 Navigation (cont) 37. Navigation Projects on which Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys only were Conducted during Period ....................................... ............. 22 38. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................ 22 39. Navigation Work under Special Authorization ........................................ ............ 22 Beach Erosion Control 40. Brevard County, FL .......................................... 22 41. Broward County, FL Beach Erosion Control and Hillsboro Inlet, FL Navigation Project .......... 23 42. Duval County, FL ...................................... 24 43. Ft. Pierce Beach, FL .......................................... 24 44. Indian River County, FL .................................. 24 45. Lee County, FL................................. ............ 25 46. Manatee County, FL ............................................. 26 47. Martin County, FL.................................... 26 48. Nassau County, FL ............................................... 27 49. Palm Beach County, FL .................................. 28 50. Palm Beach Island, FL ...................................... 28 51. Pinellas County, FL .................... .................... 29 52. St. Johns County, FL ......................................... 29 53. Sarasota County, FL ......................................... 30 54. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ....................................... .......... 31 55. Beach Erosion Control Activities under Special Authorization ........................................ 31 Flood Control 56. Central and Southern Florida ........................... 31 57. Dade County, FL ....................................... 32 58. Dade County, N. of Haulover Beach, FL ........... 33 59. Four River Basins, FL ...................................... 34 60. Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR .................... 34 61. Rio De La Plata, PR....................... .............. 35 62. Rio Puerto Nuevo, PR... ...................... 35 63. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ....................................... .......... 36 64. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........... 36 65. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization .......................... .............. ............ 36 9-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 General Investigations 66. Surveys .............................................................. 36 67. Collection and Study of Basic Data ..................... 36 68. Continuation of Planning and Engineering .......... 36 69. Advance Engineering and Design ..................... 37 General Regulatory 70. Permit Evaluation...................................... 37 71. Enforcem ent .......................... ................................ 37 72. Studies ................................... .......................... 37 Project Modifications 73. Kissimmee River Restoration ........................... 38 74. Everglades South Florida Ecosystem Restoration .......................................................... 38 75. Restoration Work under Special Authorization .......................................... 39 *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of the chapter. 9-2 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (R&H ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for control and progressive eradication of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water-milfoil, and other noxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economical control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with report of Chief of Engineers, H 251/89/1. The Water Resource Development Act of 1986 amended the River and Harbor Act of 1965 requiring the local sponsor to share 50 percent of planning costs and 50 percent of research costs that are local in nature. The cost of research that is regional or national in scope shall be borne fully by the United States. Local cooperation. Florida Department of Natural Resources holds the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and contributes 50 percent of cost of operations. Compliance with requirements of local cooperation is on schedule. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Costs incurred was $144,434. Condition at end of fiscal year. Operations by the Corps and the State of Florida are in progress; water hyacinths within Florida are under maintenance control. Hydrilla is continuing to spread throughout the state and is causing major problems in some areas. 2. ARECIBO HARBOR, PR Location. The harbor is located on the north shore of Puerto Rico about 40 miles west of San Juan Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25668.) Previous project. For details see page 504 of 1956 Annual Report. Existing project. The project provides for a channel 25 feet deep by 400 feet wide, with flare at entrance and widening at inner end to form a maneuvering area and a stone breakwater 1,200 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. A bulkhead wharf 688 by 220 feet providing deep water berthing space of approximately 500 feet and a 300 by 100-foot transit shed. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1944. Breakwater was repaired in 1952. Wave action has since caused damage. 3. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT) Location. That part of Intracoastal Waterway between southerly limit of Fernandina Harbor, FL, at junction of Lanceford Creek and Amelia River, and St. Johns River, FL. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11489.) Previous project. For details see page 605 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. Channel 12, 90 to 150 feet wide from Fernandina Harbor to St. Johns River, about 22 miles long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 6 feet at Fernandina and 3.8 feet at St. Johns River. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Existing project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of 1913 (H 898/62/2) and 1938 (H 618/75/3). Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There is a commercial marina located at Sisters Creek. No other facilities exist along this section of the waterway and none are currently required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Channel and canal cost was $100. Engineering and design cost was $17,700. 9-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1941. 4. BAKERS HAULOVER INLET, FL Location. The inlet connects the Intracoastal Waterway and the Atlantic Ocean and is located 2 miles north of Miami Beach in Dade County, Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 11 by 200 feet, thence 8 by 100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway and a marina basin 8 by 200 feet. The length of the project is 1.02 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in December 1964. 5. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL Location. The harbor is located on the east coast of Florida in Canaveral Bight, about 146 miles south of the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor and 69 miles north of the entrance to Fort Pierce Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11478 and 11484.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 37 foot deep entrance channel and maintenance of the 44 foot deep Navy channel in the 37 foot channel reach; and 35 foot depth turning basin; construction and operation of a sand transfer plant; relocation of the perimeter dike about 4,000 feet westward and extension of the harbor westward; south entrance jetty 1,100 feet long and the entrance jetty 1,150 feet long; a lock; a channel and turning basin 31 feet deep near the relocated dike; and a barge canal 12 by 125 feet from the turning basin to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Plane of reference is mean low water (Banana River) for barge canal. The project is about 11.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 3.5 feet at the entrance and practically non-tidal in Banana and Indian Rivers. (See Table 9-I for Data Relative to Lock.) Estimated cost (October 1997 price levels) for Canaveral Harbor Deepening project is $6,600,000 Federal and $3,100,000 non-Federal and project cost for Canaveral Harbor Sand Transfer System is $124,470,000 Federal and $4,930,000 non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must; provide all lands, rights-of-way, spoil-disposal areas, retaining dikes, and embankments; hold United States free from damages; provide and maintain four-lane bridge and roadway subject to Federal contribution of 65.3 percent of cost of constructing bridge and 51.2 percent of constructing roadway; provide public terminal and transfer facilities; and make alterations as required in berthing facilities. For further details see Senate Document 140, 87th Congress, 2nd session. Non-Federal contribution for new work is $2,567,441. Terminal facilities. Canaveral Harbor has 27 commercial waterfront facilities. The General Cargo Facilities consist of 1,900 feet of usable berthing space capacity of 168,000 square feet. The Oil Handling Facilities operate with 3,760 feet of usable berthing space and 1,413,000 barrels of tank storage. Available warehouse storage includes 28,000 square feet of dry storage and 2,500,000 cubic feet of cold storage. Open storage is 189 acres. Three-cruise ship berths totaling 1,400 feet long by 34- foot depth and three 8,800 square foot cruise terminals are also located on the south side. The western cruise ship berth is equipped with a roll on/off ramp and is adjacent to 20 acres of trailer storage area. Hoisting facilities consist of one 45-ton floating crane and crawler and mobile cranes, with capacities from 70 to 200 tons, available from local crane rental services. There are 2 waterfront marine repair facilities with the nearest dry-dock facilities located at Port Everglades and Jacksonville. Two tugs with ratings of 1,600 and 2,250 horsepower are also available. There is no rail service available at the port. The nearest rail service is the Florida East Coast Railway located 9 miles away. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (Sec Port Series No. 16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real estate cost was $8,996. Channel and canal cost was $15,677. Breakwater and seawall cost was $99,995. Navigation ports and harbor cost was $163,370. Beach replenishment cost was $4,581,920. Reconnaissance cost was $14,176. Feasibility cost was $2,649. Miscellaneous activities cost was $1,105. Engineering and design and construction management costs were $300,110 and $416,466 respectively. HTRW cost was $13,465. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation of lock and dam amounted to $484,900 for the fiscal year. Operation 9-4 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT of service utilities costs $11,300. Condition and operation studies cost $133,800. Water quality control costs were $27,500. Real estate management was $900. Project operations management cost was $22,000. Lands and damages cost $300. Lock maintenance cost $72,700. Maintenance of levees and floodwalls cost was $60,600. Maintenance of non-recreational buildings and grounds cost was $18,500. Channel and canal maintenance cost was $273,800. Engineering and design and construction management cost $2,780,100 and $140,600 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Remaining work for the deepening includes riprapping the north bank to stabilize slopes and prevent further erosion. Construction of widener at entrance channel was initiated. P&S for north bank erosion repair are being prepared. PAC required for widener. PCA needs amended for widener and erosion repair. Sand bypass was awarded and completed in May 98. North jetty sand tightening completed in March 98. South jetty repair is anticipated to be completed in mid FY 99. 6. CHANNEL FROM NAPLES TO BIG MARCO PASS, FL Location. Naples Bay is on the southwestern side of the Florida peninsula about 35 miles south of the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River and approximately 1-mile inland and parallel to the Gulf of Mexico coastline. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11430.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an interior channel 6 by 70 feet from Naples to Big Marco Pass; a channel 12 by 150 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to Gordon Pass, thence 10 by 100-70 feet to a 10 foot depth turning basin in the upper Naples Bay; and an 8 foot depth turning basin at the municipal yacht basin. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 2.1 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see Annual Report of 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Contributed funds for new work were $159,975. Terminal facilities. Four seafood-packing houses; 4 marine repair yards; a municipal pier and basin for use by recreational boats; and numerous private piers and slips for both commercial and recreational craft are available. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results duringfiscal year. None. Condition at end offiscal year. The project is complete. 7. CHARLOTTE HARBOR, FL Location. The Harbor is located on the west coast of Florida about 68 miles south of the entrance to Tampa Bay and 150 miles north of Key West. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11429.) Previous projects. For details, see page 457 of 1959 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 32 by 300 feet, increased to 700 feet at the bend, from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Boca Grande to and including a turning basin at 200 feet square at the municipal terminal at Punta Gorda. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 29.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is one foot at Port Boca Grande and 1.4 feet at Punta Gorda. Extreme range is about 3 feet at Port Boca Grande and 3.8 feet at Punta Gorda. Strong southwesterly winds raise water levels about 1.5 feet; strong northerly and easterly winds lower water levels about one foot. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local cooperation is fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities consist of a phosphate wharf at Port Boca Grande and a municipal earthfill pier about 850 feet long at Punta Gorda, both open to the public. Railway connections are available at Port Boca Grande, and highway and railway connections are available at Punta Gorda. There is a tank farm at Port Boca Grande for storage and rehandling of bunker fuel oil and numerous facilities are available in the area for docking and servicing small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations of locks and dams cost was $6,500. Operation of service facilities cost was $15,000. Condition, environmental and operation studies cost $62,300. Water quality control cost was $21,300. Lands and damages cost was $1,000. Channel and canal maintenance cost was $1,612,700. Engineering and design and construction management costs were $214,100 and $455,000 respectively. 9-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1959. (See Table 9-A for total project costs.) In addition, $15,563 was expended from contributed funds for new work in Boca Grande entrance channel. 8. CROSS FLORIDA BARGE CANAL Location. The proposed canal extends up the St. Johns River, past Palatka, thence up the valley of the Oklawaha River across the divide south of Ocala, and down the valley of the Withlacoochee River to the Gulf of Mexico, about 95 miles north of Tampa, Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a lock canal with project depth of 12 feet and a minimum bottom width of 150 feet, with five locks and two earth dams. Project including the section in the St. Johns River is 184 miles long. (See Table 9-J for Locks and Dams.) WRDA 92 authorizes and directs ASA(CW) to offer to enter into a contract to operate and maintain the project at a level necessary to ensure safe operating conditions and to prevent deterioration of the structures. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction of canal; hold the United States free from damages; and operate and maintain all highway bridges and roadways built in connection with project. Terminal facilities. None. Regulation. a. Lake Ocklawaha. During the period, the lake continued to be regulated at 18.0 feet, NGVD by discharging through the Rodman spillway. b. Lake Rousseau. During the period, the lake continued to be regulated at 27.5 feet, NGVD by discharging through the Inglis Main and Bypass Spillways. Operations and results duringfiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of locks and dams cost was $12,400. Operation of service facilities cost was $-3,400. Real estate management cost was $4,600. Maintenance of levees and floodwalls cost was $-34,500. Maintenance and purchase of non-recreational operating equipment cost was $- 2,200. Engineering and design cost was $26,500. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project commenced February 25, 1964, and is 36 percent completed. Inglis Lock, Dam, and Spillway; Rodman Dam and Spillway; Eureka Lock, Dam, and Spillway; Henry H. Buckman Lock; and canal from Palatka to Lake Ocklawaha and from Withlacoochee River to Gulf of Mexico, including Inglis Bypass Channel, are completed. Construction work on the project was terminated in FY 1971 by order of the President. A restudy report and environmental impact statement were completed in February 1977. Project was deauthorized in Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-640) and $5,000,000 of prior appropriations was withdrawn. 9. EAU GALLIE HARBOR, FL Location. The Harbor is located on Indian River about midway of the State of Florida, 176 miles south of Jacksonville Harbor and 174 miles north of Miami Harbor. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 8 by 100 feet from Indian River to and including a 300 by 600-foot turning basin in Eau Gallie. The project is about 2,700 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. The harbor is almost nontidal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. A privately owned boatyard in Eau Gallie Harbor provides more than 600 feet of docking space used chiefly by pleasure boats. There are also 2 marine railways and repair and storage facilities available. The facilities are considered adequate for the present needs of navigation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1939. In December 1982, the controlling depth of the channel was 5 feet. 10. FERNANDINA HARBOR, FL Location. Entrance to the harbor is located on the northeast coast of Florida about 95 miles south of the entrance to Savannah Harbor, Georgia, and 22 miles north of the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11503.) 9-6 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 32 foot depth channel (maximum channel in active status: 28 feet) generally 300-400 feet wide from deep water in the ocean to the junction of Lanceford Creek with Amelia River; an 800 foot wide turning basin at the first bend below Lanceford Creek; and 2 jetties, 19,150 and 11,200 feet long. The project is 7 miles long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 5.8 feet on the bar and 6 feet in the inner harbor. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $935,000. Terminal facilities. There are 2 large wharves operated by industrial plants; 12 wharves serving fishing boats, recreational craft, and other vessels; 3 oil handling wharves with pipelines; and a Municipal Marina and Sportsman's Wharf with public facilities for small craft. Total berthing space is approximately 4,065 feet. Most terminals are served by rail, and all have highway access. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16 (Part 2), 1964.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of locks, dams, and reservoirs cost was $4,900. Operation of service facilities $6,200. Operation of flood control structures $14,900. Condition, environmental and operation studies cost $98,200. Water quality control cost was $100. Real estate management cost was $2,200. Project operations management cost was $1,200. Lands and damages cost was $1,200. Channel and canal maintenance cost was $3,511,100. Engineering and design and construction management cost was $84,400 and $100,700 respectively. Credits totaled $3,200. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the existing project is complete. Jetties are in poor condition and are badly in need of repair. Remaining work is to deepen the inner harbor channel and turning basin to 32 feet when and if the presently inactive 1950 authorization is reactivated. The entrance channel has been deepened to 46 feet for the Kings Bay project. Authorized depths were restored as of March 1991. 11. FORT MYERS BEACH, FL Location. Fort Myers Beach is on Estero Island near the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River, about 20 miles below Fort Myers and 110 miles south of Tampa, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11427.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 by 150 feet from that depth in San Carlos Bay into Matanzas Pass, thence 11 by 125 feet in Matanzas Pass to and including a turning basin 2,000 feet upstream from the upper shrimp terminals. Plane of reference is mean low water. Project is 2.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 1.7 feet. Spring range is about 2.3 feet. Strong northerly winds lower the water surface 1 to 2 feet; strong southerly winds have an opposite effect. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are 3 shrimp-packing houses and several fish-packing houses, 2 marine railways, a fuel terminal and an ice manufacturing plant in the area. There are several commercial facilities for servicing shrimp boats. Recreational craft facilities include 9 marinas, a boat motor testing laboratory which is closed, and numerous privately owned piers and wharves. All terminals have highway access. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of locks and dams cost was $400. Operation of service facilities cost was $900. Condition and operation studies cost was $40,400. Water control cost was $5,400. Lands and damages cost was $4,200. Channel and canal maintenance cost was $402,300. Engineering and design cost was $52,100. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. 12. FORT PIERCE HARBOR, FL Location. On east coast of Florida, about 218 miles south of entrance to St. Johns River and about 124 miles north of entrance to Miami Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11475.) Existing project. A channel 350 feet wide at the 27 foot contour in the ocean, tapering to a width of 200 feet at Station 100+00, thence 200 feet wide to Sta. 30+00, and thence flaring to a turning basin 900 feet wide. Entrance channel is 27 feet deep to Sta. 130+00 and thence 25 feet deep to and including the turning basin. Project includes the maintenance of two jetties and shore revetments at the inlet. Length of project is about 3.5 miles. 9-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Plan of improvement consists of enlarging the existing entrance channel to 400 feet wide and 30 feet deep , the interior channel to 250 feet wide and 28 feet deep, the existing turning basin to 1,100 feet square and 28 feet deep, and providing an access channel 1,250 feet long, 250 feet wide and 28 feet deep north of the main turning basin. Mean tidal range is 2.6 feet at the entrance and 0.7 feet at terminals. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see 1961 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $2,503,387. A 25% contribution and an additional 10% reimbursement over 30 years from locals are required. Terminal facilities. Two earth-filled piers forming a slip 200 by 300 feet, with bulkhead wharf at inner end, affording berthing space of about 1,653 feet. The south pier and bulkhead wharf are municipally owned. Facilities also include a cooling plant, a warehouse and a fruit-packing house. Railway and both piers serve the north pier by highway connections. North of the turning basin local interests have provided deep-draft berthing and pier facilities. Also available is a bulkhead wharf with a depth of 25 feet with ample room for open storage and with tank storage for petroleum in the rear. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of locks, dams and reservoirs cost was $5,500. Condition and operation study cost was $114,400. Water control management $25,300. Real estate management cost was $1,500. Lands and damages cost was $400. Channel and canal maintenance cost was $561,600. Engineering and design cost was $69,500. Construction management cost was $33,600. Condition at end of fiscal year. Mitigation contract completed in May 1996. No further work is scheduled. 13. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER TO ANCLOTE RIVER, FL Location. The Waterway extends from the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River at Punta Rassa, Florida, to the mouth of Anclote River, Florida, following in general an almost continuous series of protected inside waterways along the gulf coast of Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11411, 11425 and 11427.) Previous projects. For details see page 767 of 1945 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 9 by 100 feet from Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River; deepening the existing channel at Casey's Pass to 9 feet; a channel 6 by 80 feet (Cats Point Channel) along the southeastern side of Boca Ciega Bay past Frenchman Creek and Gulfport; maintenance of bulkheads, revetments, and two jetties built at Casey's Pass under previous project; and improvement and maintenance of Sunshine Skyway Channel. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project includes about 160 miles of channels. Mean ranges of tide are 1.7 feet at Punta Rassa, 1 foot at Port Boca Grande, 1.4 feet in Tampa Bay at Anna Maria, and 2 feet at entrance to Anclote River. Extreme ranges are about 4.5 feet at Punta Rassa, about 3 to 4 feet between Port Boca Grande and Corey Causeway over Boca Ciega Bay, and about 5.5 feet at entrance to Anclote River. Southerly winds over the area generally raise water levels by 1 to 1.5 feet; northerly winds lower water levels by 1 to 2 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities include one municipal concrete pier, one railway pier, one freight wharf, one marginal wharf 500 feet long on terminal island, and 11 privately owned landings, all at Sarasota. Municipal pier and freight wharf are open to the public. All piers have highway connections. There are 6 wharves along Boca Ciega Bay and a number of small privately owned piers and wharves at various points along waterway for use by commercial fishing boats and recreational craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys cost $98,800. Water control management cost was $200. Real estate costs was $35,900. Lands and damages cost was $2,000. Engineering and design cost was $31,100. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. A contract to maintain the jetties at Casey's Pass was completed in 1983. 9-8 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 14. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FL Location. The Waterway extends from Jacksonville to Miami, Florida, following the St. Johns River to the mouth of Pablo Creek and thence following in general an almost continuous series of protected inside waterways along the Atlantic coast of Florida to Miami. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11489, 11485, 11472 and 11467.) Previous projects. For details, see pages 618-619 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 by 125 feet from Jacksonville to Miami, modified by Chief of Engineer's report of July 22, 1960; side channels at Sebastian and Daytona Beach and turning basins at Sebastian and Vero Beach, all to an 8 foot depth, and operation and maintenance of Palm Valley highway bridge. Project is 370 miles long, including 21 miles in Jacksonville Harbor. Mean range of tide is 3.8 feet at St. Johns River, 0.7 foot in Indian River at Fort Pierce, 1.8 feet in Lake Worth at Port of Palm Beach terminals, 2.3 feet at the Port Everglades terminals, and 2 feet in Biscayne Bay. The extreme range is about 7 feet at St. Johns River, 1.5 feet at Fort Pierce, and 3 feet in Biscayne Bay. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal effect is imperceptible at points along waterway distant from inlets. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are a number of privately owned piers, wharves, and landings at various points along waterway. Terminals with railway connections are available at Jacksonville, Fort Pierce, West Palm Beach, Port Everglades, and Miami. Municipal piers or wharves have been constructed at Titusville, Cocoa, Melbourne, and Vero Beach for handling general freight and at St. Augustine, Daytona Beach, New Smyrna Beach, Eau Gallie, West Palm Beach, Delray Beach, Fort Lauderdale, and Miami for use of recreational craft. Yacht basins, open to the public, have been provided at Jacksonville Beach, Daytona Beach, Titusville, Eau Gallie, Vero Beach, Fort Pierce, West Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale, Hollywood, and Miami. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details on facilities at Jacksonville, see Port Series No. 15, 1969, and at Palm Beach, Port Everglades, and Miami, see Port Series No. 16, Revised 1972.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of locks and dams cost was $81,400. Operation of service facilities was $186,800. Operation of power plants cost was $100. Natural resource management cost was $31,900. Recreational management cost was $100. Condition, environmental and operation studies cost $89,400. Water quality control cost was $77,600. Real estate management cost $205,900. Project operations cost was $31,000. Lands and damages cost was $7,900. Maintenance of recreational facilities cost was $400. Utilities, supplies and maintenance of non-recreational facilities cost was $200. Channel and canal maintenance cost was $1,365,900. Engineering and design and construction management cost $725,800 and $93,800 respectively. Credits were $1,700. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project as modified by the Chief of Engineers is complete. (Construction of the channel and turning basin at Sebastian, Florida, was deauthorized by WRDA of 1988, P.L. 100-676.) (See Table 9-A for total project costs.) In addition, $2,199,842 has been expended from public works funds for new work. 15. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL Location. The authorized project comprises the lower 24.9 miles of St. Johns River, which empties into the Atlantic Ocean near the northeasterly corner of the Florida peninsula. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11491.) Previous projects. For details, see page 607 of Annual Report, 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 38 feet deep by 400-1,200 feet wide from ocean to mile 20 via Dame Point-Fulton Cutoff, thence 34 feet to Commodore Point, and thence 30 feet deep to the FEC railway bridge at Jacksonville, including a 30 foot channel in Arlington cut in the old Dames Point-Fulton channel; maintenance of the existing 42 and 40 foot depth entrance channel; widening of channel by 100 feet near mile 5 and by 200 feet near mile 7; maintenance of jetties at channel entrance; construction of training walls and revetments; a navigation and floodway channel 26 by 200 feet along south side of Commodore Point; on approach and mooring basin 20 feet deep, 1,300 feet long at 20 foot depth contour and 600 feet long at pierhead line near Naval Reserve Armory in south Jacksonville; a depth of 24 feet between that depth contour and the pierhead line 9-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 from Hogan Creek to the foot of Laura Street; and a depth of 28 feet to within 60 feet of pierhead line between foot of Laura Street and St. Elmo W. Acosta (formerly Upper State) bridge. Length of project is about 26.8 miles. In addition the Navy has provided funds for a deeper Jacksonville Harbor entrance channel 42 feet deep and 800 feet long, intersecting with the Navy's Mayport entrance channel to the Mayport turning basin; also an extension of the existing project to provide 38 foot depth for the Navy fuel depot, at Drummond Creek. Mean tidal range is 5.3 feet on the bar, 4.9 feet at Mayport, 2.6 feet at Dame Point, and 1.1 feet at Jacksonville. The extreme range varies from about 9 feet on the bar to about 1.5 feet at Jacksonville. Strong northeasterly winds raise the water level about 2 feet at Mayport and Jacksonville. Strong southwesterly winds lower the water about 1.5 feet at Mayport and one foot at Jacksonville. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Estimated cost of new work (October 1996 price levels) $112,500,000 Federal and $37,500,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with requirements of local cooperation for work performed to date. For work authorized by the 1965 River and Harbor Act, local interests were required to contribute 2.6 percent of the contract price plus supervision and administration for work provided by the Corps; provide all lands and rights-of-way; save the United States free from damages; and provide and maintain public terminal and transfer facilities. Assurances of local cooperation for this work were accepted February 11, 1966. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $927,654. Terminal facilities. Jacksonville Harbor has 84 waterfront facilities. Available at the General Cargo Facilities are 11,140 feet of usable berthing space and 12 transit sheds with a total storage space of 1,009,800 square feet. The Oil Handling Facilities consist of 7,843 feet of usable berthing space and 179 storage tanks providing a total of 8,478,900 barrels of tank storage. Warehouse storage at the port includes 3,266,900 square feet of dry storage and 4,071,100 cubic feet of cold storage. Available open storage is 233 acres. Four fixed cranes with capacities from 40 to 100 tons are located at the port. Available locally are crawler and truck cranes with capacities up to 100 tons. Various phases of marine repair work are accomplished by 7 waterfront repair facilities and numerous other companies located offwater. Dry-dock facilities consist of 6 floating drydocks with capacities from 800 to 33,000 tons. Floating equipment includes 25 tugs with up to 3,300 horsepower and 16 tank barges with capacities up to 20,700 barrels. Three major railroads furnish rail service from port docks to all points outside of Jacksonville. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce (See Port Series No. 15, Rev. 1978.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of locks and dams cost was $26,600. Operation of service utilities cost was $21,300. Natural resource management cost was $1,800. Condition, environmental and operation studies cost $476,100. Water quality control cost was $108,000. Real estate management cost $39,000. Project operations cost was $1,600. Lands and damages cost was $400. Maintenance of breakwater, jetty, and seawalls was $2,700. Channel and canal maintenance cost was $2,973,800. Engineering and design and construction management cost $861,500 and $123,700 respectively. Credits total $-800. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the modification to the project, authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act, is completed. The north jetty is in fair condition and partially submerged at high tide. The south jetty was repaired in FY 1985 to prevent further damage to the Mayport Naval Station. Revetments and retaining walls were in poor condition. Authorized project depths were restored as of January 1991. Feasibility study to consider improvements of deepening 14 miles of channel to 42 feet has been delayed in an effort to quantify additional benefits and was to be completed in March 1998. PED initiation delayed by feasibility completion. (See Table 9-A for total project costs.) In addition, $290,013 has been expended from public works funds for new work. 16. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR (MILL COVE), FL Location. The authorized Mill Cove project comprises a 6 square mile body of shallow water on the St. Johns River approximately 10 miles from the Atlantic Ocean near the northeasterly corner of the Florida peninsula. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11491.) Previous project. None. 9-10 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Existing project. The authorized project provides improved flow and circulation through Mill Cove to eliminate further shoaling. This large shallow area averages about 2 to 4 feet deep, is about 5.5 miles long, and varies from 0.5 to 2.0 miles wide. It is situated along the St. Johns River near the Dame Point-Fulton Cutoff portion of the Jacksonville Harbor navigation project. The Mill Cove project includes dredging a 650 foot by 3,600 foot flow channel at the west end to -12 feet MSL; enlarging the weir opening at the eastern end to 1,300 feet wide and -12 feet MSL; and installing flow diversion features at the west and east ends of the cove. Mean tidal range is 4.9 feet at entrance, 4.5 feet at Mayport, 3.0 feet at Dame Point, and 1.2 feet at Jacksonville. Strong northeasterly winds raise the water level about 2 feet at Mayport and Jacksonville. Strong southwesterly winds lower the water about 1.5 feet at Mayport and 1 foot at Jacksonville (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. In conformance with Section 221, Public Law 91-611, and prior to commencement of construction, the Jacksonville Port Authority, as local sponsor, must provide written agreement to the following local cooperation requirements: provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages that result due to construction and maintenance other than damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; accomplish without cost to the United States such utility and other relocations or alterations as necessary for construction. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1990. 17. JOHNS PASS, FL Location. A natural inlet on the west coast of Florida connecting Boca Ciega Bay with Gulf of Mexico. The pass is located about 8 miles northwest of lower Tampa Bay directly across Boca Ciega Bay from St. Petersburg, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11411.) Existing project. Channel 10 by 150 feet in the Gulf, thence 8 by 100 feet inside pass, and 6 by 100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, and suitable protective measures over a frontage of approximately 1,000 linear feet of shore along the north end of Treasure Island. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 1.5 feet. Project is about 2.6 miles long. Project was authorized December 2, 1964 by the Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act and by Section 110 of the 1966 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Only small marinas and repair yards for recreational craft are in the general vicinity. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1968. Authorized project depths were restored as of June 1991. 18. LONGBOAT PASS, FL Location. Longboat Pass is located on the west coast of Florida about 11 miles northwest of Sarasota and 23 miles south of St. Petersburg. Located in Manatee County, it is one of several natural inlets connecting Sarasota Bay, a tidal estuary, with the Gulf of Mexico. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11425.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 12 by 150 feet from the Gulf to Longboat Pass Bridge, thence a channel 10 by 100 feet from Longboat Pass Bridge along a north to northeasterly alignment to the Intracoastal Waterway to Cortez Bridge. The mean tidal range is 2.2 feet and the maximum tidal range is about 5 feet. Currents are predominantly tidal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. See 1978 Annual Report for detailed local cooperation requirements. Contributed funds for new work were $172,324. Terminal facilities. From Sarasota north to Tampa Bay there are about 28 small craft facilities including marinas, boat repair yards, and boat basins along the Intracoastal Waterway. Nine of them are located within 2 miles of Longboat Pass. Numerous private mooring piers and wharves also exist in the area. The marina and repair facilities appear adequate for the general boating needs of the area. 9-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Channel and canal maintenance cost was $700. Engineering and design cost was $1,500. Construction management cost was $-100. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. Authorized project depths were restored as of June 1991. 19. MANATEE HARBOR, FL Location. The project is located in Manatee County on the east side of Tampa Bay 10 miles from the Gulf of Mexico. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11414.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for maintenance of the existing 40-foot deep draft navigation channel and turning basin, which extends from Tampa Bay Channel to berthing facilities at Port Manatee. Also provide initial construction for a widener at the northwest end of the Manatee Harbor Channel and initial construction to deepen approximately 6.6 acres adjacent to the southern berthing area to provide a larger turning basin. All material from the project will be placed on upland sites west and northeast of the port slip. Estimated cost of new work (October 1997'price levels) $19,900,000 Federal and $15,700,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. A 25 percent contribution and an additional 10 percent reimbursement over 30 years from locals are required. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $2,586,943. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities at Port Manatee consist of 675 acres of port operational lands, a ship basin 1,500 feet long by 788 feet wide; and an approximately 3 mile access channel, with a design width of 400 feet, which connects with the Federally authorized Tampa Bay Channel. The Manatee project was constructed between August 1968 and February 1970. The required design depth was 40 feet, and the dredging contractor was allowed a pay overdepth of 2 feet. Port Manatee also operates its own terminal railroad, which is licensed under the Interstate Commerce Commission, and publishes a switching tariff as a Class III railroad. It also maintains and operates 2 switch engines and about 30,000 feet of track, which connects with the CSX Railroad. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Lands and damages cost was $599. Navigation ports and harbor cost was $4,636. Reconnaissance cost was $181. Feasibility cost was $67. Engineering and design and construction management cost was $69,811 and $960 respectively. Maintenance: Operation of locks and dams cost was $3,800. Operation condition survey cost was $1,400. Water quality management cost was $100. Channel and canal cost was $652,600. Engineering and design cost was $102,500. Supervision and administration cost was $2,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. The dredging will be completed in two phases, with Phase I completed in December 1996. Phase II for wideners, turning basin, and mitigation currently scheduled for award in November 1998. 20. MAYAGUEZ HARBOR, PR Location. The Project is on the west coast of Puerto Rico, about 110 miles by water from San Juan Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25673.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 30 by 1,000-foot approach channel to the deep-water terminal, decreasing to a 500-foot width opposite the westerly end of terminal, thence the same width to the easterly end of terminal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. A modern deep water terminal is located in the northeast section of the harbor consisting of a bulkhead wharf about 1,270 feet long with a storage transit shed 800 by 60 feet immediately shoreward. The Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company, an agency of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, owns a bulkhead wharf of about 200 feet in line with the existing deep water terminal plant located within the industrial harbor area. In addition, Bumble Bee Packing Company, Inc., owns and operates a dock of about 200 feet for docking tuna fish boats. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1934. 9-12 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 21. MELBOURNE HARBOR, FL Location. The project is on Indian River about midway of the State of Florida, 179 miles south of Jacksonville Harbor and 171 miles north of Miami Harbor. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 8 by 100 feet from Indian River to a 400 by 800 foot turning basin in Crane Creek. Project is about 3,150 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. The harbor is almost non-tidal. Terminal facilities. The Municipal Marina on the north end of the turning basin has a 350 foot steel bulkhead with 11 finger piers, each about 40 feet long. There are also 2 privately owned storage and repair facilities and several privately owned boathouses and docks. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1938. As of September 1984 channel depths as authorized were available throughout the project. 22. MIAMI HARBOR, FL Location. Miami is near the northern end of Biscayne Bay, about 71 miles south of the entrance to Palm Beach Harbor. Miami River has its source in the Everglades and flows southeasterly to enter Biscayne Bay at Miami. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11468.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 38 by 500 foot channel from the ocean to the outer end of the north jetty, thence 36 by 400 feet through the entrance and across Biscayne Bay to and including a turning basin at the municipal terminals; a 36 foot depth turning basin at Fisher Island; 2 rubblestone jetties at the entrance; and a channel 15 feet deep in Miami River varying in width from 250 feet at mouth to 90 feet 5.5 miles inland. Plane of reference is mean low water, except for 15-foot channel in Miami River where depths are based on flood conditions. Total length of the project is about 13 miles. Mean tidal variation is 2.5 feet at entrance and 2 feet in the bay. Extreme variation is about 4.5 feet at entrance and 3 feet in Biscayne Bay. Strong easterly winds raise the water level about 1.5 feet at entrance and I foot in the bay. Strong westerly winds lower water level about 1 foot at entrance and about 0.5 foot in the bay. Estimated cost (October 1997 price levels) for Miami Harbor Channel is $47,300,000 Federal cost and $36,400,000 non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. See 1978 Annual Report for detailed local cooperation requirements. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $2,300,710. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1968 modification to the project were accepted December 18, 1968. Terminal facilities. There are 91 commercial waterfront facilities serving the port. The General Cargo Facilities include 21,373 feet of usable berthing space, 13 transit sheds with a total capacity of 474,300 square feet, and 9 freight stations with a total storage capacity of 270,400 square feet. Oil Handling Facilities consist of 2,714 feet of usable berthing space and 36 storage tanks with a total storage capacity of 744,475 barrels. Available sharehouse storage includes dry storage of 1,450,500 square feet and cold storage of 11,204,000 cubic feet. There are 117.1 acres of open storage at the port. Hoisting Facilities located at the port include two 40 ton cranes and cranes with capacities up to 200 tons available through local rental. Twelve waterfront repair yards and 2 offwater yards serve the port. Dry-dock facilities available include 7 marine railways and 4 boat lifts with haulout capacities ranging from 40 to 1,000 tons and lifting capacities ranging from 79 to 500 tons. Nine tugs, with ratings up to 3,000 horsepower, and 13 tank barges, with capacities up to 35,000 barrels, are also available. Rail Facilities at the port are served by the CSX and the Florida East Coast Railway. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Navigation ports and harbors cost was $204. Reconnaissance cost was $309. Engineering and design cost -$4,000. Construction management cost was $63,328. Maintenance: Condition, operation and environmental studies cost $243,000. Real estate management cost was $14,000. Engineering and design cost $26,800. Condition at end offiscal year. Project has been delayed due to contractor fmnancial problems and difficulties with rock dredging. Dredging is anticipated to be completed in FY 99. 23. NEW PASS, SARASOTA, FL 9-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Location. Sarasota Bay is a tidal lagoon along the west coast of Florida immediately south of Tampa Bay. New Pass is a gulf inlet across the bay from Sarasota, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11425.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide in the Gulf of Mexico diminishing to 8 by 100 feet through New Pass and extending across Sarasota Bay to the Intracoastal Waterway with side channels to, and turning basins at, Payne Terminal and city pier. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet in Sarasota Bay; mean spring range is 1.7 feet. Project is about 4 miles long. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Consist of Payne Terminal, a slip 200 by 650 feet, and city pier, 400 feet long with 2 finger piers equipped with adequate facilities at each location. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of locks and dams cost was $300. Condition survey cost was $6,200. Channel and canal maintenance cost was $-21,500. Engineering and design cost was $700. Construction management cost was $-500. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1964. Authorized project depths were restored as of April 1991. 24. OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FL Location. The waterway traverses the southern part of the Florida peninsula via the Caloosahatchee River, Lake Okeechobee, and St. Lucie Canal, connecting coastal waterways along the Gulf and Atlantic Shores. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11428.) Previous project. For details, see page 785 of 1949 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for replacing the old locks on the St. Lucie Canal by a single new lock; a channel 10 by 100 feet from Ft. Myers for about 5 miles upstream, thence 8 by 80-100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, near Stuart; a side channel at Ft. Myers; operation and care of St. Lucie Lock; and maintenance of features completed under previous projects as follows: a 12 by 200 foot channel from the Gulf of Mexico to Punta Rassa, thence 10 by 100 feet to Ft. Myers with a 10 foot depth basin at Fort Myers; a 6 by 80 foot channel along the south shore of Lake Okeechobee from Clewiston to St. Lucie Canal; a 6 by 60 foot channel in Taylor Creek from the town of Okeechobee to the Lake; and operation and care of Moore Haven and Ortona Locks. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Non-Federal contribution amounted to $503,700. Terminal facilities. There are 3 freight piers, one municipal recreation pier, 4 privately owned piers, and a municipal yacht basin on the Caloosahatchee River near Fort Myers. The Corps has provided a boat basin, launching ramp, and a 120 foot wharf on the Caloosahatchee River about one-quarter mile below Ortona Lock. There are tie-up dolphins above and below all 5 locks. Commercial yacht basins are provided on the south side of the Caloosahatchee River about halfway between Ortona and Moore Haven Locks and about 3 miles east of LaBelle. A commercial/municipal yacht basin is provided on the north side of the St. Lucie Canal at Indiantown. There are numerous small wooden-pile landings along the Caloosahatchee River, St. Lucie Canal, and on the St. Lucie River, including one railroad terminal pier, municipal pier, and a pier for handling petroleum products at Stuart. Also, 550 feet of wharves have been provided on the west side of Taylor Creek immediately landward of Hurricane Gate No. 6 and 150 feet on the east side of the creek. A yacht basin has been provided on the west side of the creek immediately landward of the hurricane gate. The installations on Taylor Creek are privately owned, but are open to the public. A breakwater protected harbor is available at Pahokee. There is a 440 foot marginal wharf on the Industrial Canal at Clewiston; a 125 foot wharf at LaBelle; a 150 foot wharf at Belle Glade; a 125 foot wharf at Moore Haven; a 50 foot wharf at Alva; and a 30 foot wharf on Taylor Creek at the town of Okeechobee. A docking facility for loading raw sugar was constructed in 1967 on Herbert Hoover Dike near Belle Glade. All have highway and/or railway connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results duringfiscal year. (See Table 9- L for work accomplished.) 9-14 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. (The 8 foot depth basin at Stuart was deauthorized by WRDA of 1988, P.L. 100-676.) 25. OKLAWAHA RIVER, FL Location. The river has its source in a system of large lakes in the central part of the Florida peninsula and flows generally northerly, then easterly, emptying into St. Johns River 22 miles upstream from Palatka. The extreme head of the system is considered to be Lake Apopka, 120 miles above the river's mouth. Previous projects. For details, see page 613 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for clearing a channel to Lake Griffin; maintaining dikes to obtain a navigable depth of about 4 feet to Leesburg and construction of a lock and dam at Moss Bluff. The project length is about 85.7 miles. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Several private and public landings and boat-launching ramps are located along the river. Public recreation craft basins and boat launching ramps are near Silver Springs and State Roads 40 and 316 bridges. There is a municipal wharf on Lake Griffin at Leesburg. A dam has created Lake Ocklawaha (13,000 acres) with egress to the St. Johns River through Buckman Lock. Along the lake are 4 launching ramps; Payne's Landing, Orange Springs, Kenwood Landing, and Rodman Recreation Area. Access below the dam is at the Ocklawaha Boat launch ramp and at State Road 19. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Channel maintenance cost $43,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. (A 6 foot depth channel from the mouth of the river to the head of Silver Springs Run was deauthorized.) The Moss Bluff lock and dam structure was replaced under the Four River Basins, Florida flood control project. 26. PALM BEACH HARBOR, FL Location. The authorized project is located on the east coast of Florida about 71 miles north of the entrance to Miami Harbor and about 264 miles southeasterly from the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11472.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 35 by 400 feet merging with an inner channel 33 by 300 feet to and including a turning basin; tank revetment; and restoring jetties. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 1.6 miles long. Mean range of tide in the ocean at the entrance is 2.8 feet and at the turning basin, 2.2 feet. Extreme range of tide is about 4.5 feet at the inlet and 3 feet at the terminals. Seven foot tidal ranges have occurred during storms. For details, see 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. For requirements, see 1961 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. The port has 13 commercial waterfront facilities. The General Cargo Facilities include 5,156 feet of usable berthing space and 6 transit sheds with a total of 118,030 square feet of storage capacity. The Oil Handling Facilities consist of 10 storage tanks with a total capacity of 2,029,600 barrels. Usable berthing space is not available at the Oil Handling Facilities. Dry storage is available at 150,500 square feet, cold storage at 19,200 cubic feet and open storage at 27.1 acres. Seven cranes with capacities from 15 to 230 tons are located at the port. There are no floating cranes, repair facilities or dry-dock facilities located at the port. A 100 ton vertical boat lift is located on the Intracoastal Waterway south of the port for heavy lifts. Two tugs with ratings of 900 and 1,000 horsepower are available. The Palm Beach Belt Line which connects with the Florida East Coast Railway serves the port. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No.16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation for locks and dams cost was $4,600. Natural resource management cost was $11,100. Condition, operation and environmental studies for the project totaled $344,500. Water quality control cost was $37,500. Real estate management cost was $3,100. Land and damages cost was $4,800. Channel maintenance cost $1,246,600. Engineering and design and construction management cost $248,200 and $84,800 respectively. 9-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1967. Jetties and revetment are in need of repair. The south jetty was completed in FY 1986. Maintenance dredging was completed May 1996. Future maintenance dredging will occur yearly as necessary depending on shoaling conditions. 27. PALM VALLEY BRIDGE, FL Location. Palm Valley Bridge is located over the Intracoastal Waterway on State Road 210 in St. John's County, Florida. Existing project. The project provides for the replacement of the existing Palm Valley Bridge with a new high level bridge that is fixed for navigation. Additional roadway construction will be required because of the new bridge alignment. The old bridge will be removed and the intracoastal waterway in the vicinity of the old bridge will be dredged to its authorized dimensions. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation). Estimated cost (October 1997 price levels) is $18,700,000 Federal. Local cooperation. Operations and maintenance at an estimated $75,000 per year. Terminal facilities. None in the immediate area. Operations and results during the fiscal year. New Work: Real estate cost was $4,249. Navigation cost was $56,639. Feasibility cost was $1,364. Engineering and design cost was $129,620. Supervision and administration cost was $114. Condition at end of fiscal year. Local sponsor is funding expansion from 2 to 4 lanes. PCA execution, real estate acquisition and revision of plans and specifications are underway. 28. PONCE DE LEON INLET, FL Location. Ponce de Leon Inlet is on the Atlantic coast of Florida about 65 miles south of St. Augustine Harbor and 57 miles north of Canaveral Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11485.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 15 by 200 feet across the ocean bar, thence 12 by 200 feet and 12 by 100 feet through the inlet; thence southward in Indian River North, 12 by 100 feet, and northward in Halifax River, 7 by 100 feet, each leg continuing to the Intracoastal Waterway; ocean jetties on the north and south of the inlet 4,200 and 2,700 feet long respectively, and weir in the north jetty with an impoundment basin inside the jetty. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 4.1 feet in the ocean and 2.3 feet inside the inlet. the project is about 5 miles long. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $2,415,600. Terminal facilities. None in the immediate area. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance Operation of locks and dams cost was $12,400. Operation and condition surveys cost was $111,200. Water quality control cost was $40,000. Project operations management cost was $600. Lands and damages cost was $13,600. Breakwater, seawall, and jetty maintenance cost was $1,108,000. Channel and canal maintenance cost was $100. Engineering and design cost $70,200. Construction management cost was $35,100. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. Maintenance is required on the North Jetty. Draft report under review is considering shoaling problems impacting navigation safety and Division Engineer's public notice is scheduled for November 1997. Will initiate preconstruction, engineering, and design in FY 98. 29. PONCE HARBOR, PR Location. Ponce Harbor is an open bay about midway on the south coast of Puerto Rico. From the center of the city of Ponce, the harbor is about 3 miles south. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25677.) Previous project. For details, see page 12 of Annual Report for 1975. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a seawall 362 feet long extending northwesterly across the rock reef from near the landward end of the municipal pier, 30 feet deep and containing about 18 acres; a breakwater 2,400 feet long extending southwesterly from Punta Carenero; a channel 36 feet deep by 600 feet wide extending from the Caribbean Sea approximately 2.8 miles up to the port, thence a channel 400 feet wide by 36 9-16 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT feet deep into the harbor, and a 36 foot deep, irregularly shaped turning basin with a diameter of 959 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 0.6 foot, extreme varies between about 1 foot below and 2 feet above mean low water. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Should provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide and maintain at local expense depths in berthing areas and local access channels; hold United States free from any damages resulting from construction and maintenance of the project; relocate without cost to the United States all cables, sewer mains, water supply, drainage and other utility installations as required; provide adequate public terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms. A letter has been received from mayor of Ponce, assuring compliance with local requirements and to cost share the project. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $717,304. A 25 percent contribution is required and an additional 10 percent reimbursement over 30 years from locals. Terminal facilities. The municipality of Ponce owns and operates the only deep-draft terminal facilities in Ponce Harbor, which consist of a municipal pier 515 feet long and 108 feet wide, and a bulkhead wharf 3,811 feet long. Both are equipped for transfer and storage of freight. A 40 ton container lift shore crane is available for the handling of loaded containers. The municipal pier has a steel transit shed 386 by 85 feet. The bulkhead wharf has 4 steel transit sheds totaling over 103,000 square feet. Three concrete and steel warehouses are available providing 800,000 square feet for general storage. Open storage areas for structural steel, lumber, and other bulk and package commodities are also provided. Bulk cement is handled and loaded into cement cargo ships by the use of a private pipeline loading facility. A tuna fish processing and canning factory is located on the premises, with direct access to the bulkhead wharf. Existing facilities are open to the public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. South and north jetties are in fair condition. 30. PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FL Location. The harbor is on the east coast of Florida about 23 miles north of Miami and about 48 miles south of Palm Beach Harbor, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11470.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an ocean entrance channel 45 by 500 feet through an ocean bar tapering to 42 by 450 feet between rubblestone entrance jetties, and continuing at that depth to an irregularly flared entrance and turning basin of same depth; enlarging Pier 7 channel to 36 by 400 feet for distance of about 1,600 feet; maintenance of the locally dredged channel opposite Berth 18 to 36 feet deep over a length of 700 feet with varying widths of 200 to 150 feet; construction of a south jetty fishing walkway; and, maintenance of the jetties. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 1.9 miles long. Mean range of tide is 2.5 feet at the entrance and 2.3 feet at the terminals; extreme range is about 4.5 feet with storm tides of about 6.5 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work completed to date. For work under H 144/93/1, local interests must: provide all lands, easements and rights-ofway; save United States free from damages; accomplish utility and other relocations or alterations; provide depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with depths provided in the related project areas; establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into waters of the channel by users thereof; prohibit erection of any structure within 100 feet of project channel as authorized at time of construction; provide and maintain public terminal and transfer facilities; contribute 50 percent of total first costs of recreational jetty fishing facility; and operate and maintain jetty fishing facility. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1974 authorization have been furnished by the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. There are 22 commercial waterfront facilities serving the port. The General Cargo Facilities include 13,807 feet of usable berthing space, 7 transit sheds with a total capacity of 393,870 square feet, and 6 container yards with space for 3,965 containers. Oil Handling Facilities consist of 232 storage tanks with a total storage capacity of 9,564,800 barrels. There is no usable berthing space located at the Oil Handling Facilities. Dry storage is available at 225,000 cubic feet and open storage at 100.3 acres. Hoisting facilities available from a local firm include 5 cranes with capacities from 20 to 155 tons. No floating 9-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 cranes or derricks for heavy lifts are available at the port. There are 2 marine repair yards. Dry-dock facilities include 2 dry-docks with capacities of 2,200 and 3,200 tons and a 4,270 ton vertical boat lift. Three tugs with ratings up to 4,290 horsepower serve the port. The Port Everglades Belt Line connects with the CSX railroad to serve the port. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance of locks and dams cost was $7,800. Condition survey cost was $164,600. Water quality control cost was $2,400. Project operations cost was $200. Engineering and design cost was $72,500. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work required to complete the project is construction authorized in H 144/93/1. 31. REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA. Location. Water hyacinth, hydrilla and water lettuce are found in freshwater streams and lakes in various parts of the district. Existing project. The authorized project provides for destruction or removal of aquatic growth in navigable waters of the State so far as they constitute an obstruction to navigation and commerce, using any mechanical, chemical or other means not injurious to cattle, and use of log booms to close sloughs and backwaters as an auxiliary means. No estimate of the final cost of work has been made. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details, see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations continued during the year. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation and Table 9-M for spraying operations.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is for maintenance of navigable waterways. During the year 24,556 acres of floating vegetation (water hyacinth and/or water lettuce), and 2,136 acres of hydrilla were controlled in approximately 2,200 miles of waterways. Hyacinth in Lake Okeechobee and in St. Johns River Watershed is under maintenance control. 32. ST. AUGUSTINE HARBOR, FL Location. The harbor is on the east coast of Florida, about 35 miles south of the entrance to St. Johns River and about 180 miles north of Fort Pierce Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11485.) Previous project. For details see page 412 of Annual Report for 1958. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 16 by 200 feet along the best natural new inlet bar, thence 12 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway; a sandtrap groin on the north side of the inlet extending seaward from the shore of Vilano Beach, and a sand-tight jetty on the south side of the channel extending seaward from the shore of Conch Island parallel to and coextensive with the groin; future landward extension of the groin and jetty; and a channel 10 by 100 feet in San Sebastian River from the Intracoastal Waterway to King Street Bridge, with a turning basin near the upper end. Length of the inlet channel is about 1.5 miles, and length of the San Sebastian River channel is about 2.6 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. The mean tidal range is 4.5 feet in the ocean at St. Augustine Inlet and 4.2 feet at the city waterfront. Strong northerly winds, mostly in the winter, lower the water surface about 1 foot. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are several timber docks on the Matanzas waterfront of St. Augustine. In this area of the harbor is a concrete dock which serves as a municipal yacht pier. It has fuel facilities, 19 slips and accommodates boats up to 60 feet in length. A large public boat ramp is also available. The principal terminals are the numerous shrimp docks in the San Sebastian River which flows southward through the city into the Matanzas River south of the bridge. These consist of timber wharves, with frame and corrugated iron warehouses thereon, and 9 marine railways for small boats. There is also a marine supply facility and several boat yards. The present terminals have highway connections and several of the shrimp docks have rail connections. They are considered adequate for existing commerce and recreational craft. 9-18 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of service utilities cost was $3,600. Condition and operation study cost was $7,900. Real estate cost was $300. Channel and canal maintenance cost was $- 117,100. Engineering and design cost was $13,700. Construction management cost was $-3,200. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for the North Jetty which is in a deferred status. The groin is in good condition except for the 300 feet which has subsided to about elevation 3.0 feet, mean low water. The jetty is in good condition, but is submerged at high tide. Maintenance dredging at the entrance channel was completed June 1996. 33. ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL, JACKSONVILLE TO LAKE HARNEY Location. Rises in marshes of Brevard County, Florida, near east coast, and flows northwesterly to Jacksonville, thence easterly into the Atlantic Ocean, 122 miles south of Savannah River. River is about 285 miles long, of which 161.5 miles are included in project. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11492.) Previous projects. Adopted by River and Harbor Acts of June 14, 1880 and July 5, 1884. For further details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. Channel is 13 by 200 feet from Florida East Coast Railway bridge at Jacksonville to Palatka, thence 12 by 100 feet to Sanford, and thence 5 by 100 feet to Lake Harney, with side channel to Enterprise and maintenance of two jetties. Existing project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of March 2, 1945 (H 445/78/2) and July 24, 1946 (SD 208/79/2). For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Terminal facilities. There are 36 piers and wharves along project, including municipal piers and wharves at Green Cove Springs and Palatka, 12 Navy piers at Green Cove Springs, a municipal recreational pier at Sanford, and 19 privately owned piers, 5 of which have nearby tank storage facilities for petroleum projects. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results duringfiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Active portion is complete. Condition of project as a whole is adequate for present needs of navigation. (For more detailed information refer to 1963 Annual Report.) 34. ST. LUCIE INLET, FL Location. The inlet is on the east coast of Florida about 19 miles south of the entrance to Fort Pierce Harbor, Florida, and 100 miles north of the entrance to Miami Harbor, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11472.) Previous project. For details see page 764 of Annual Report for 1949. Existing project. The authorized project provides for extending the north jetty about 500 feet and modifying existing jetty to provide a sand bypass weir section about 500 feet long; excavation of a sand impoundment basin adjacent to the bypass weir in the north jetty; construction of a south jetty consisting of a rubblemound structure about 2,400 feet long with a walkway for recreational fishing; channel between existing bar cut and the Intracoastal Waterway 10 by 500 feet through the bar cut, tapering to 150 feet through the inlet, and 7 by 100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway; and transfer of 380,000 cubic yards of material to the south beach during each two year maintenance period. Total project length is about 1.9 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 2.6 feet on the ocean side and about one foot on the land side of the inlet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Estimated cost of new work (October 1997 price levels) $18,600,000 Federal and $6,200,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Local interests must: contribute 19.9 percent of construction cost allocated to navigation in the combined project, 23.1 percent allocated to beach erosion, and 50 percent of construction cost of jetty fishing walkway; provide 39.8 percent of the annual maintenance cost allocated to navigation and 23.2 percent of the annual costs for maintenance dredging allocated to beach erosion control for periodic beach nourishment and 100 percent of the annual jetty maintenance costs allocated to beach erosion control; maintain jetty fishing walkway; agree that each 5 years the amount of local cost sharing for maintenance is to be adjusted; provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold United States free from damages; provide marina with mooring facilities and utilities; provide and maintain depths in berthing area and local access and feeder channels commensurate with the depths provided in the project; accomplish such alterations as required to sewer, water 9-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 supply, drainage, and other utility facilities, and take action to place in effect statutes and/or regulations which will protect water quality for the authorized uses of the project. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1974 modification were signed by the local sponsor on August 24, 1978. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $3,743,199. Terminal facilities. A municipal pier provides facilities for docking and servicing charter fishing and small recreational craft. At Stuart there is a dock for handling bulk petroleum products and several marinas which provide facilities for mooring, servicing and minor repair of small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Recreation management cost was $10,500. Condition and operations studies cost $85,700. Water quality control cost was $400. Channel and canal maintenance cost was $-122,500. Engineering and design cost was $17,600. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work required to complete the project is construction authorized in HD 294/93/1. Authorized project depths were restored as of July 1991. Maintenance dredging was completed June 1996. Improvements to the inlet were authorized in 1974. Due to limited funding during construction, the south jetty was completed 1,000 feet short of the authorized length, the impoundment basin was not constructed to design capacity as a shallow subsurface rock was encountered. Sufficient commercial benefits were identified in the economic update study to reclassify the inlet from a predominately recreational usage inlet to a commercial usage inlet. Preconstruction, engineering, and design is scheduled for completion in December 1999. A section 221 agreement was signed for the initial construction and the locals will use this as authority to initiate land acquisition. A supplemental agreement may be required. 35. SAN JUAN HARBOR, PR Location. San Juan Harbor is on the north coast of Puerto Rico and about 35 miles from the east end of the island and 1,100 miles southeast of Miami, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25670.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1916, and 1938. Existing project. Modification of the authorized project to provide the deepening of the Bar Channel to 48 feet and shifting its alignment 350 feet west; deepening Anegado and Army Terminal to 40 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel, the Cruise Ship Basin, Puerto Nuevo Channel, and San Antonio Channel to 36 feet; and deepening Anchorage Area E to 38 feet while reducing its size and constructing 6 mooring dolphins within its limits. A 1,500 foot long extension to San Antonio Channel would be added to the Federal project and Sabana approach deepened to 32 feet. Estimated cost of new work (October 1997 levels) $34,400,000 Federal and $13,600,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Should provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from any damages; provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access and feeder channels; provide alterations as required to sewer, water supply, and other utility facilities. It is further recommended that local interests be reimbursed for work performed by them on the project subsequent to project authorization. A 25 percent contribution and an additional 10 percent reimbursement over 30 years from locals are required. Terminal facilities. There are 28 piers and bulkhead wharves in the harbor capable of docking deep-draft vessels, which have an aggregate berthing length of about 23,700 feet. Eleven piers and bulkhead wharves are on the north shore, 2 piers and a three-level ramp facility for roll-on/roll-off operations at Front Graving Dock turning basin and channel, 9 at the eastern side and 3 at the western side of the Army Terminal basin and channel, and 3 on the south shore of San Antonio Channel. One pier and bulkhead wharf are privately owned, 7 are U.S. Government property, and 24 are owned by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Twenty piers and wharves are equipped with mechanical crane transfer facilities. Five wharves are equipped with a special crane for handling loaded containers. Twenty-four are open to the general public. Pier No. 6 was repaired and improved in 1985. There is an aggregate length of about 1,339 feet of berthing space at Catano Point used principally by small vessels within the 18 foot draft range. This space is also open to the public. In addition, there are 10 piers and bulkhead wharves with approximately 6,910 feet of berthing space owned and operated by different agencies of the Federal Government. This space is not open to the public. 9-20 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Lands and damages cost was $77,949. Reservoir cost was $80,931. Channels and canal cost was $3,447. Navigation ports and harbors cost was $762,724. Reconnaissance cost was $2,050. Feasibility cost was $3,328. Other studies cost was $32,717. Engineering and design cost was $268,572. Construction management cost was $43,597. HTRW cost was $43. Maintenance: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The PED phase was completed in September 1995. Revisions to the plans and specifications were accomplished in FY 97. Execution of PCA was completed June 1997. Authorized in WRDA 1996. Completed P&S for Contract 1. Existing project includes the entrance channel and turning basin to Army Terminal which cost $1,543,712 (this expenditure was made from military appropriations and is not included in Table 9-A costs). 36. TAMPA HARBOR, FL Location. Tampa Harbor is in a large natural indentation of the Gulf of Mexico about midway of the west coast of Florida. The entrance is about 220 miles north of Key West and about 330 miles southeast of Pensacola. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11413 and 11414.) Previous projects. For details see page 665 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Sutton and Tampa; 46 by 700 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to Mullet Key; 44 by 600 feet in Mullet Key Cut Channel; 44 by 500 feet in Tampa Bay from Mullet Key Cut to Hillsborough Bay and Port Tampa Channels; 44 by 500 feet in Hillsborough Bay from junction with Tampa Bay and Port Tampa Channels to the junction with Port Sutton entrance channel, thence 42 by 400 feet to the junction with Seddon and Garrison Channels; 44 by 400 feet in Port Sutton entrance channel; 42 by 400 feet in Sparkman Channel; 40 by 300 feet in Ybor Channel; 42 by 400 feet in Port Tampa Channel; 44 by 400-500 feet in East Bay entrance channel; 44 by 300 feet in East Bay approach channel; 30 by 300 feet in Seddon and Garrison Channels; 30 by 200 feet in Alafia River; 9 by 100 feet in Hillsborough River to a point 2,000 feet above Columbus River bridge; a breakwater; a 43 by 200 foot Port Sutton Terminal Channel 3,700 feet long; turning basins at Ybor Channel, Port Tampa, East Bay, mouth of Hillsborough River, and in Alafia River; and maintenance of a channel 12 by 200 feet in Hillsborough River, a 43 by 200 feet by 3,700 feet long in Port Sutton Terminal Channel, and 34 by 300 feet in East Bay Channel. (The 46 foot and 44 foot depth portions of the project include a 5 foot underkeel clearance. Special studies on the project concluded that 4 feet underkeel is sufficient. Therefore, a one foot overdepth has been placed in an inactive status, resulting in active project depths of 45 and 43 feet respectively.) Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 67 miles long, including 10 miles in Hillsborough River and 3.6 miles in Alafia River. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet at the lower end of the bay, 1.6 feet at Port Tampa, and 1.8 feet at Tampa. Extreme range is about 3.8 feet at the lower end of the bay and 4.8 feet at Tampa. Strong southwesterly winds raise the water level about 1.5 feet. Strong northerly winds, which usually occur in the winter, lower the water level about 2 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Estimated cost for Big Bend Channel (October 1997 price levels) $5,747,000 Federal and $5,601,000 non-Federal. For further details, see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Local cooperation has been fully complied with for work completed to date. See 1978 Annual Report for requirements for work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970, H 401/91/2 and H 150/91/1. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1970 authorization were approved by the Secretary of the Army on January 10, 1973. The LCA for branch channels was signed June 20, 1986. An amendment to the LCA reflecting cost sharing requirements of WRDA of 1986 for section 6 was signed August 31, 1987. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $1,853,161. A 25 percent contribution and an additional 10 percent reimbursement over 30 years is required from locals. Terminal facilities. There are 102 commercial waterfront facilities serving Tampa Harbor. The General Cargo Facilities consist of 7,226 feet of usable berthing space and 15 transit sheds with a total of 585,200 square feet of storage space. The Oil Handling Facilities include 16,440 feet of usable berthing space and 316 storage tanks for a total capacity of 11,610,350 barrels. Dry storage is available at 1,904,750 square feet, cold storage at 14,309,000 cubic feet, and open storage at 59.4 acres. There are 2 wharves available for coal storage at 750,000 tons total storage and grain elevators with a 3,400,000 9-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 bushel total capacity. One elevator on Ybor Channel has a 1,000,000 bushel capacity. Hoisting Facilities include 13 cranes, fixed and mobile, with capacities from 45 to 150 tons and other crawler and mobile cranes available locally. Marine repair yards include 9 waterfront repair facilities and numerous other offwater companies engaged in various phases of marine repair. There are 4 floating and 4 graving docks available at the port with capacities ranging from 548 to 5,400 long tons. Floating equipment includes 24 tugs with up to 3,350 horsepower and 4 companies with tank barges of capacities up to 14,000 barrels. The CSX Railroad serves the port. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 17, Rev. 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Big Bend: Engineering and design cost was $40,969. Port Sutton: Real estate cost was $27,710. Navigation ports and harbor cost was $994. Reconnaissance cost was $23,223. Feasibility cost was $11,403. Research and development cost was $179. General regulatory function cost was $193. Engineering and design cost was $126,345. Supervision and administration cost was $367. East Bay Channel: Lands and damages cost was $1,950. Channel and canal cost was $2,444. Reconnaissance cost was $23,725. Feasibility cost was $9,990. Engineering and design cost was $41,774. Supervision and administration cost was $10,403. Maintenance: Operations of locks and dams cost was $49,300. Condition and operation studies cost $342,100. Water quality control costs was $77,100. Real estate management cost was $9,800. National emergency operations cost was $100. Project operations management cost was $400. Lands and damages cost was $1,000. Channel and canal maintenance cost was $4,897,900. Engineering and design and construction management cost $218,400 and $223,000 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Alafia River portion of feasibility study is underway with economic, environmental, and ship simulator studies. A PED agreement unsigned by the local sponsor for Big Bend Channel. PCA scheduled for execution February 2000. 37. NAVIGATION PROJECTS ON WHICH RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS ONLY WERE CONDUCTED DURING PERIOD. Total cost was $529,546. 38. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 9-C.) 39. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) Fiscal year costs for Section 107 Coordination Account, $30; Island of Vieques, PR $137,182; Aguadilla Harbor, PR $15,812; Fernandina Harbor, FL $222,971; Port Everglades, FL $1,590; Salt Run, St. Augustine, FL, $4,094; Hernando Beach Channel, FL $41,228; Canaveral Harbor (West Turning Basin), FL $13,378. Snagging and clearing for navigation (Section 3 of 1945 River and Harbor Act, Public Law 14, 79th Congress.) No costs incurred. Mitigation of shore damages attributed to navigation projects (Sec 111). Stohl Road, Aguadilla Harbor, PR $72,198. Wetland/other aquatic habitat creation pursuant to Sec 204 Public Law 102-560. Cockroach Bay Habitat $32,796. Beach Erosion Control 40. BREVARD COUNTY, FL Location. The project is on the east coast of Florida at approximately the midpoint of the peninsula. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11484 and 11476.) Existing project. The authorization provides for a protective and recreational beach with a berm 50 feet wide at elevation 10 feet above mean low water and a natural seaward slope as would be shaped by wave action, along 14,600 feet of beach at the city of Cape Canaveral 9-22 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT and 10,600 feet of beach at Indiatlantic and Melbourne beach, and for periodic nourishment of the restored beach at Indiatlantic and Melbourne beach limited initially to a period of 10 years. Nourishment of the restored beach at the city of Cape Canaveral would be provided by the authorized sand-transfer plant for construction at Canaveral Harbor. The project also provides for improvement of the Federally owned shores for beach erosion control or hurricane protection to be accomplished by the Federal agencies involved, subject to their own determination of economic justification. The areas involved include 4.9 miles of shore at Kennedy Space Center, 4.0 miles at Cape Kennedy Air Force Station, and 2.3 miles at Patrick Air Force Base. Mean tidal range in the area is 3.5 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Estimated cost for new work (October 1997 price levels) $21,479,000 Federal and $19,141,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 50 percent of all first costs of the work and 50 percent of the nourishment cost at Indiatlantic and Melbourne beach for the first 10 years of the project life; provide lands and rights-of-way; provide, after the first 10 years of project life, periodic nourishment of the restored beach at Indiatlantic and Melbourne beach during project life; maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; control water pollution; and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances of local cooperation were approved by the Secretary of the Army on July 9, 1973. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $2,462,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $4,063. Beach renourishment cost was $1,977. Reconnaissance cost was $297,358. Feasibility cost was $93,030. Engineering and design cost was $240,796. Condition at end of fiscal year. Feasibility report was completed in September 1996, approved in December 1996, and authorized by Section 101(b) of WRDA 1996. PED agreement was executed September 1997 and PED is scheduled for completion September 1998. Administration does not support. 41. BROWARD COUNTY, FL BEACH EROSION CONTROL AND HILLSBORO INLET, FL NAVIGATION PROJECT Location. Broward County is on the lower east coast of Florida, 300 miles south of Jacksonville and about 30 miles north of Miami. Hillsboro Inlet is in the northern part of Broward County. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11466.) Existing project. The authorization provides for Federal participation toward cost of a shore restoration and protection project and a project to maintain a channel adequate for small craft navigation. Plan provides for restoration of a shoreline protection and recreational beach at 4 locations generally 100 feet wide with berm elevation of 10 feet above mean low water; a navigation channel 8 by 100 feet from the Intracoastal Waterway to a point 1,500 feet oceanward in Hillsboro Inlet, thence 10 by 150 feet in the ocean; jetties on north and south sides of ocean entrance; a permanently based floating dredge; and on a deferred basis, a trestle-mounted sand-transfer plant, if needed. Navigation portion of the project is in an inactive status. Mean range of tide in areas is 2.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Cost estimate for new work (October 1997 price levels) is $89,200,000 Federal and $78,000,000 non-Federal contribution. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 90.5 percent of the first cost beach restoration in the reach between north county line and Hillsboro Inlet, 90 percent of first cost allocated to beach restoration, and 50 percent of first cost allocated to navigation for reach between Hillsboro Inlet and Port Everglades and 72.4 percent of beach restoration in reach between Port Everglades and south county line; provide all lands and rights-of-way; obtain approval of Chief of Engineers of plans and specifications if local interests construct beach erosion features; and furnish assurances that they will hold the United States free from damages; provide and maintain adequate public landing or wharf at Hillsboro Inlet; establish a public body to cooperate financially and to provide and operate local facilities for navigation, control water pollution, maintain ownership of publicly owned shores, and maintain all project works except the jetties (maintenance of the channel to revert to the United States if sand-transfer plant is constructed). Assurances of local cooperation were accepted November 22, 1968. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $3,460,990. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Feasibility cost was $1,786. Engineering and design cost $6,164. 9-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was constructed by local interests and is complete. The LRR for Hillsboro Inlet has been approved. The Project Study Plan will be submitted for approval. LRR recommends plan larger than authorized. A GRR was initiated to fully evaluate the larger plan. PED is scheduled for completion January 2000. 42. DUVAL COUNTY, FL Location. On upper east coast of Florida, within 20 miles of Florida-Georgia line. Ocean shoreline is about 16 miles long. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11488.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation toward cost of construction with artificial fill, a beach 60 feet wide at elevation 11 feet above mean low water with a natural slope seaward, and for periodic nourishment for 10 years. Federal participation to be 100 percent of the first cost of construction applicable to the Federal shore and 50 percent applicable to the other publicly owned shore and 55.5 percent of periodic nourishment cost for first 10 years of project life. Mean tidal range at south jetty in St. Johns River is 4.9 feet. Estimated cost of new work (October 1997 price levels) $111,200,000 Federal and $72,900,000 non-Federal. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1965 (H 273/89/1). Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 50 percent of first cost of constructing non-Federal publicly owned shores; contribute 44.5 percent of periodic nourishment costs for first 10 years of project life; provide all lands, rights-of-way, and relocations; hold the United states free from damages; control water pollution; and furnish assurances that they will maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of federal participation is based during economic life of project. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted on November 29, 1973. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $16,895,567. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $510. Renourishunent cost was $1,803,371. Reconnaissance cost was $14,846. Feasibility cost was $3,995. Engineering and design and construction management cost $115,224 and $338 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Most recent renourishment was completed December 1995. Alternative borrow areas are proposed within the 3 mile limit to avoid Minerals Management Service lease requirements for more distant areas. Engineering and design is underway for next renourishment. 43. FORT PIERCE BEACH, FL Location. Fort Pierce Beach Erosion Control Project extends 1.3 miles south of Fort Pierce Inlet, on the east coast of Florida about 120 miles north of Miami. Existing project. The project fill was initially completed by local interests in 1971, using offshore borrow material. Prior to the nourishment, severe shorefront recession had destroyed a private residence and threatened other residences and a state road. Local interests were reimbursed the federal share of the initial project construction cost. Federal participation in renourishment was authorized for an initial 10-year period and subsequently extended five years under the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers until 1985. The project is also periodically nourished with suitable material obtained from operational maintenance of the nearby Fort Pierce Harbor federal navigation project. The project was renourished in the summer of 1980. A Section 111 project authorized in 1982 provides that 60 percent of the cost of material required to nourish 1.2 miles south of Fort Pierce Inlet should be reallocated to the navigation project. A reevaluation report is being conducted to determine whether extension of federal participation in cost sharing to 50 years is warranted. Estimated cost (October 1997 price levels) $13,000,000 Federal and $14,300,000 non-Federal. is Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $107,613. Renourishment cost was $63,467. Reconnaissance cost was $14,149. Feasibility cost was $2,966. Engineering and design cost was $195,467. Condition at end of fiscal year. The Section 934 report recommending extension of Federal participation was approved in June 1995 by ASA(CW). Renourishment for 1.3 miles was initially scheduled for winter 1997 but was delayed due to PCA execution and sea turtle window. PCA under review in ASA(CW). 44. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FL 9-24 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Location. Indian River County is on the east coast of Florida, midway between Jacksonville and Miami. The authorized project comprises 2.65 miles of beach along the ocean shore of Vero Beach and 1.7 miles along the Sebastian Inlet State Park. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11474 and 11476.) Existing project. The authorized project provides nourishment for 8,870 feet (1.68) miles) of the State Park, south of Sebastian inlet. The initial beach fill would consist of 202,000 cubic yards of nourishment material. An estimated 202,000 cubic yards of periodic nourishment at 5-year intervals would be required. The Federal share of the first cost was estimated to be 65 percent of this segment. The plan also provided for nourishment of 9,180 feet (1.74 miles) of Vero Beach. The initial beach fill consisted of 572,000 cubic yards of material, including advance nourishment. The restored beach would have a 20 foot wide level berm at an elevation of 15 feet above mean low water. The beach fill as designed would provide protection against a 10 year return interval storm. An estimated 120,000 cubic yards of periodic nourishment would be required at 5 year intervals. In addition to the beach fill a "Sabecon" reef breakwater was recommended. The structure would be placed 500 feet offshore of the new beach and would be 400 feet in length, with a zero mean low water crest elevation. The Federal share of the first cost was estimated to be 43.7 percent for this segment. The project was authorized on November 17, 1986 (Public Law 99-662) by the 1986 Water Resource Development Act. Local cooperation. The authorization of a beach erosion control project for Indian River County, Florida was made with the provision that the State and local interests will, in addition to the general requirements, agree to comply with the following requirements: provide all necessary lands, easements and rights-of way; including borrow areas and disposal areas for excavated material, and relocations; hold and save the United States free from claims for damages; assure continued conditions of public ownership and public use of the shore; assure maintenance and repair during the economic life of the project; provide and maintain as necessary access roads, parking areas and other public use facilities; provide a cash contribution for periodic nourishment's for the life of the project; provide an additional cash contribution for the Sebastian Inlet State Park Beach. The project, as authorized, provides that the work may be accomplished in separate units or features and that the written agreement with non-Federal interests be obtained. The Indian River County Board of Commissioners, by letters dated December 21, 1984 and January 15, 1987, affirmed their support for the project and their willingness and ability to share in project costs. Operations and results duringfiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. No work is currently scheduled. 45. LEE COUNTY, FL Location. Lee County is on the lower Gulf coast of Florida, about 90 miles south of the entrance to Tampa Bay and 130 miles north of Key West. Existing project. The project provides for the Federal participation in restoration and protection of Lee County, Florida, as follows: On Gasparilla Island, restore beach along 2.7 miles of shore and provide revetment along 2,400 feet of shore and a 500-foot terminal groin; on Captiva Island, restore beach along 4.7 miles of shore; and on Estero Island, restore beach along 4.6 and provide a 5-year advance supply of beach nourishment material and periodic nourishment of the restored beaches, as needed, with Federal aid for nourishment limited to the first 10 years of project life after completion of the initial fill placement on each island. Estimated cost (October 1997 price levels) is $8,900,000 Federal cost and $35,600,000 non-Federal cost. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local Cooperation. Local interest must: contribute in cash )including contract price, engineering and design, and supervision and administration) 65.8 percent of first cost at Gasparilla Island, 91.3 percent of first cost at Captiva Island, and 87.5 percent of first coast at Estero Island; contribute toward beach nourishment for the first 10 years of project life, 95.5 percent for Gasparilla Island; 91.3 percent for Captiva Island, and 96.9 percent for Estero Island; and contribute 50.9 percent of the annual maintenance costs of the terminal groin on Estero Island; provide after 10 years of project life periodic nourishment of the restored beaches; provide lands, easements, rightsof- way, and relocations; assure continued public ownership for public use of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; control water pollution; save the United States free from damages; and 9-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 provide an adequate width of beach with acceptable access and other facilities necessary for public use. Operations during the year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $6,935. Renourishment cost was $298,771. Reconnaissance cost was $23,569. Engineering and design cost was $44,296. Construction management cost was $8,650. Condition at end of fiscal year. Continued GRR for Estero and Gasparilla Islands. ASA(CW) approved sponsor's use of Section 206 authority. 46. MANATEE COUNTY, FL Location. Manatee County is on the west coast of Florida, just south of the entrance to Tampa Bay. The county's 14 mile gulf shoreline consists of 2 barrier islands, Anna Maria Key and the northern half of Longboat Key, separated from the mainland by Tampa and Sarasota Bays and from each other by Longboat Pass. Project consists of about 7.5 miles of gulf shoreline. Existing project. Provides for Federal participation in the shore protection project for Manatee County which includes the entire 7.5 mile gulf shoreline of Anna Maria Key. The project consists of restoration of 3.2 miles of gulf shore beach to an elevation 6 feet above mean low water with a level berm 50 feet wide and a natural slope seaward as would be shaped by wave action. The project also provides for periodic nourishment of the restored beach and such adjacent shoreline as may be and justified for the project life. Mean tidal range is 2.3 feet. Estimated cost (October 1997 price levels) is $43,600,000 Federal and $36,400,000 non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. The authorization of a shore protection project for Manatee County, Florida was made with the provision that Federal cost sharing would be in accordance with policy established by existing law, and the percentages based on conditions of shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction: Provided that, prior to construction, local interests furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: (a) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow areas, and relocations necessary for construction of the improvements; (b) Provide a cash contribution equal to 47 percent of the first cost of construction, subject to any credit for eligible construction costs incurred by local interests, and exclusive of costs for lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and alterations, and exclusive of the cost of fill placed behind the Corps construction line, the final percentage to be based on shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction; (c) Provide all costs of construction for nourishment landward of the Corps construction line; (d) Provide a cash contribution for periodic nourishment equal to 41 percent of the cost of each nourishment, such contribution to be made prior to each nourishment operation, and the final percentage to be based on shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction; (e) Hold and save the United States free from damage due to the construction works, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (f) Assure continued public ownership and administration of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; (g) Provide without cost to the United States appropriate access and facilities, including parking and sanitation, necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based; (h) Adopt appropriate ordinances, or provide other means, to insure the intended use of the beach fill areas; (i) Control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (j) Agree to pay 100 percent of the operation, maintenance, and replacement and rehabilitation's costs of the project, or functional element thereof. Non-Federal contribution for new work is $3,337,348. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $6,734. Renourishment cost was $31,789. Reconnaissance cost was $3,346. Engineering and design cost was $6,653. Condition at end of fiscal year. Need to identify alternative offshore borrow areas. The local sponsor desires to construct the project under Section 206. ASA(CW) concurs. PCA will require amending. 47. MARTIN COUNTY, FL Location. Martin County is located on the east coast of Florida about 300 miles south of Jacksonville and 70 miles north of Miami. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Existing project. The recommended plan of improvement for Martin County provides for restoration of a protective beach along 3.75 miles of shoreline. The plan includes restoration of the primary dune as needed and a 35 foot wide protective berm. The recommended plan was designed to reduce environmental impacts. Of primary 9-26 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT importance is the impact of project construction on sea turtle nesting. In order to avoid these impacts, project construction has to occur between November 1st and April 15th. Only one island segment is authorized for this project which is located on Hutchinson Island in Martin County. The project begins at the St. Lucie/Martin County line and proceeds south 4 miles. The actual project to be constructed is 3.75 miles. The project was shortened 0.25 miles to avoid impacting sensitive hardgrounds. The borrow area is approximately 3,000 feet offshore of the southern end of the project area. Estimated cost of new work (October 1997 price levels) is $25,600,000 Federal and $30,300,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Martin County Board of Commissioners is the local sponsor. Non-Federal funds will be requested from the sponsor following execution of the PCA. Non-Federal contributions for new work is $5,030,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Lands and damages cost was $521. Beach renourishment cost was $2,817. Reconnaissance cost was $119,823. Feasibility cost was $2,586. Engineering and design cost was $50,732. Engineering during construction cost $11,529. HTRW cost was $14,625. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial nourishment was completed April 1996. Monitoring required by FDEP permit and approved in GDM. Post-construction monitoring of the project performance, sea turtles, and adjacent hardgrounds is underway. 48. NASSAU COUNTY, FL Location. Nassau County is on the east coast of Florida, north of Jacksonville and adjoins the state of Georgia. The authorized project comprises 4.3 miles of beach along the ocean shore of northern Amelia Island, and tightening 1,500 feet of the shoreward end of the existing south jetty at the entrance to Fernandina Harbor. Existing project. The authorized project would provide initial restoration of 3.6 miles of eroded beach, starting at a point about .7 mile south of the Fernandina Harbor south jetty and extending south to Sadler Road; sand tightening about 1,500 feet of the shoreward end of the south jetty; and periodic nourishment of 4.3 miles of shore between the south jetty and Sadler Road. The restored beach would have a 20 foot wide level berm at an elevation of 13 feet above mean low water. The initial beach fill would consist of an estimated 1,100,000 cubic yards of nourishment material. An estimated 240,000 cubic yards of nourishment at 2-year intervals would be required. Sand tightening would require about 16,700 tons of stone. The Federal share of the first cost was estimated to be 77%. (Sand tightening, accomplished as part of the Navy's effort to deepen and widen the navigation channel, was deleted from the plan.) Estimated cost of new work (October 1997 price levels) $13,000,000 Federal and $3,500,000 non-Federal contributed funds. Local cooperation. The authorization of a shore protection project for Nassau County, Florida was made with the provision that the State and local interests will, in addition to the general requirements, agree to comply with the following requirements: provide without cost to the United States all necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow areas and disposal areas for excavated material and relocations required for construction of the project, including that required for periodic nourishment; hold and save the United States free from claims for damages which may result from construction and subsequent maintenance, operation and public use of the project, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; assure continued conditions of public ownership and public use of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based during the useful life of the project; assure maintenance and repair during the useful life of the project as required to serve the project's intended purpose; provide and maintain clearly marked beach access, nearby parking areas, and other public use facilities, open to all on equal terms, and as required to realize the benefits upon which Federal participation is based; provide a cash contribution for beach erosion control equal to the appropriate percentage of the final construction cost allocated to this function, exclusive of lands, easements, rights-of-way, alterations, and relocations, the percentage to be in accordance with existing law and based on shore ownership at the time of implementation; provide a cash contribution for periodic nourishment during the useful life of the project, such contribution to be made prior to each nourishment, with the actual amount to be based on existing law and conditions of ownership at the time of each nourishment; and at least annually inform affected interests of the limitations of the protection afforded by the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $45,317. Renourishment cost was $1,476. Reconnaissance cost was $2,929. 9-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Feasibility cost was $8,579. Collection of basic data cost was $3,884. Engineering and design cost $178,306. Condition at end offiscal year. Preparation of the GRR is underway. 49. PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL Location. Palm Beach County is on the east coast of Florida about 300 miles south of Jacksonville and 70 miles north of Miami. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11466.) Existing project. Project authorization, the River and Harbor Act of 1962, provides for Federal participation toward the cost of local shore project for restoration of beaches to a general width of 100 feet with a berm elevation of 10 feet above mean low water, and periodic nourishment for 10 years from the year of initial nourishment, as follows: 62.1 percent of the cost for Martin County line-Jupiter Inlet segment; 55.8 percent of cost for Jupiter Inlet-Lake Worth Inlet segment; and 50 percent for south Lake Worth Inlet-Delray Beach; and 53 percent of cost for Delray Beach-Boca Raton inlet segment. Mean range of tide is 2.8 feet in the Atlantic Ocean at Palm Beach and 2.3 feet at Boca Raton Inlet. Estimated cost (October 1997 price levels) for Palm Beach County is $78,000,000 Federal and $159,200,000 non-Federal cash contributions. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Federal participation is subject to the conditions that responsible local authorities will: (a) obtain approval by the Chief of Engineers, prior to commencement of work on the project, of detailed plans and specifications and arrangements for prosecution of the work on the project; (b) provide at their own expense all necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way; (c) furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: (1) assure maintenance of the protective measures during their economic life as may be required to serve their intended purpose, and periodic nourishment of the protective beach at suitable intervals; (2) control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (3) maintain continued public ownership of the publicly owned shores upon which a part of the recommended Federal participation is based and their administration for public use during the economic life of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $3,409. Navigation port and harbor cost was $233. Reimbursable contract cost $5,273,831. Reconnaissance cost was $3,098. Engineering and design was $51,459. Construction management cost was $3,363. Condition at end of fiscal year. The sponsor completed initial construction of the 1.1 mile initial beach fill at the Jupiter/Carlin portion of the project in May 1995. This project was authorized for construction by the sponsor with subsequent reimbursement of the Federal share of eligible costs. Audit complete for Jupiter/Carlin .and reimbursed Federal share. 50. PALM BEACH ISLAND, FL Location. Palm Beach Island is on the east coast of Florida about 300 miles south of Jacksonville and 70 miles north of Miami. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11466). Existing project. The River and Harbor Act of 1958 authorization provides for Federal participation in the costs of a plan for protection of the shore of the Palm Beach Island, comprising restoration of a protective beach with berm elevation of 10 feet above mean high water from Lake Worth Inlet to a point about 1,000 feet south of Southern Boulevard extended, thence with a general width of 100 feet to South Lake Worth Inlet, construction and operation of a sand-transfer plant at Lake Worth Inlet, and additional periodic nourishment from Lake Worth or other suitable source, substantially in accordance with the plan developed by the district engineer, with such modifications thereof as may be considered advisable by the Chief of Engineers. Federal assistance would entail contribution of funds in the amount of 4.7 percent of the initial construction cost of the beach restoration and appurtenant drainage work, and of the expenditures for periodic nourishment from Lake Worth for a period of 10 years from the year of the initial placement, plus 19.3 percent of the expenditures for construction, and for operation, maintenance, and current replacements of parts of the sand-transfer plant for the same period. Mean tidal range is 2.8 feet in the Atlantic Ocean at Palm Beach and 2.3 feet at Boca Raton Inlet. Estimated cost (October 1996 price levels) for Palm Beach Island is $13,400,000 Federal and $154,100,000 non-Federal cash contribution. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 9-28 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Local cooperation. Federal participation is subject to the conditions that responsible local authorities will: (a) obtain approval of the Chief of Engineers, prior to commencement of work on the project (except the sandtransfer plant already under contract), of detailed plans and specifications and arrangements for prosecution of the work on the project; (b) make appropriate modification of the location of the end of the discharge line of the sand-transfer plant to accomplish satisfactory dispersion of bypassed material; (c) provide at their own expense all necessary lands, easements, and rights-ofway; (d) furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: (1) assure maintenance of the protective measures during their economic as may be required to serve their intended purpose, and periodic nourishment of the protective beach at suitable intervals, including operation of the sand-transfer plant; (2) control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (3) maintain continued public ownership of the publicly owned shores upon which a part of the recommended Federal participation is based and their administration for public use during the economic life of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Other study cost was $60. Condition at end offiscal year. No work scheduled. 51. PINELLAS COUNTY, FL Location. Pinellas County is on the Gulf coast of Florida, about midway of the peninsula. It extends northerly about 39 miles from the main entrance to Tampa Bay to the vicinity of the mouth of Anclote River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11411.) Previous project. For details see page 429 of Annual Report for 1965. Existing project. The authorized project provides for Federal participation in preserving and protecting the shores of Pinellas County, Florida, by: restoration of 5,000 feet of beach at Clearwater Beach Island; restoration of 49,000 feet of beach at Sand Key; restoration of 9,200 feet of beach at Treasure Island; construction of 600 feet of revetment at Long Key; and advance nourishment of Long Key and periodic nourishment of each island. Estimated cost (October 1997 price levels) is $144,600,000 Federal and $98,100,000 non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must (a) contribute in cash the required percentages of the first costs of work provided by the Corps of Engineers, the percentages varying with the type of beach ownership; 94.1 to 50 percent of the beach restoration at Clearwater Beach; 98.1 to 50 percent of the improvement at Sand Key; 94.3 to 50 percent of the improvement at Treasure Island; and 50 percent of the first cost of the revetment at Long Key; (b) contribute in cash an amount computed in accordance with the cost sharing provision contained in P.L. 826, 84th Congress as amended by P.L. 87-874, for beach nourishment cost for the first 10 years of the project life; (c) provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; (d) assure maintenance and repair of the stone revetment of Long Key; (e) assure periodic nourishment of the restored beaches; (f) assure public ownership of beaches; (g) assure against water pollution; (h) hold the United States free from damages; and (i) provide beach for public use. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted March 22, 1967. Non-Federal contribution for new work is $25,160,345. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Beach renourishment cost was $11,928,000. Engineering and design and construction management cost $901,000 and $476,000 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Sand Key, Phase IV, contract awarded. Engineering and design on Long Key and Treasure Island is continuing. 52. ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FL Location. St. John's County is located about 100 miles south of the Florida/Georgia border. Existing project. The project consists of restoration of 2.5 miles of shoreline, beginning approximately 2.7 miles south of St. Augustine Inlet, and including the City of St. Augustine Beach. The authorized project provides for initial restoration of the beach to a width of 80 feet +12 feet elevation relative to mean low water. The initial fill would consist of placement of #,580,000 cubic yards of beach quality sand, includes six years of advanced nourishment. The project would replace sand lost due to frequent northeasters and provide storm protection to upland development. The borrow area is located at the ebb tidal shoal south of St. Augustine. The project was authorized with a 50 year project life from the start of construction. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 9-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Estimated cost is $161,800,000 Federal and $30,600,000 Non-Federal. Local cooperation. The sponsor of this project is the St. John's County Board of Commissioners. Cost sharing for this project is 76.4 percent Federal and 23.6 percent Non- Federal. The cost sharing reflects the higher Federal percentage required to mitigate for erosion caused by the Federal navigation project at St. Augustine Harbor. PCA will be executed following completion and approval of the General Reevaluation Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $42,948. Channel and canal cost was $5,807. Beach renourishment cost was $96,322. Feasibility cost was $4,762. Collection of basic data cost was $1,165. Miscellaneous cost was $1,083. Engineering and design cost was $45,678. Condition at end of fiscal year. The economic update to evaluate the economic justification for the project has been approved and recommendations were made for further design. The General Reevaluation Report is currently underway. 53. SARASOTA COUNTY, FL Location. Sarasota County is on the Gulf coast of Florida about 30 miles south of Tampa Bay. The northern most portion of the project adjoins the Manatee County Beach Erosion Control Project on Longboat Key. The total project consists of about 5.7 miles of gulf shoreline on Longboat Key and Venice Beach. Existing project. The authorized project provides for Federal participation in the construction of a protective beach 12,600 feet long at Longboat Key and a protective beach 29,400 feet long at Manasota Key at the City of Venice, Florida. Two borrow areas will be required. The first is located within 2 shoal areas located between 1 to 2 miles offshore of Manasota Key south of the project area. This borrow area will be supplemented by material located within the ebb tidal shoal of Big Sarasota Pass which is about 13 nautical miles north of the project beach at Venice. The project also provides periodic nourishment of the restored beach and such adjacent shoreline as may be needed and justified for life of the project. The mean tidal range is 2.1 feet. Estimated cost (October 1997 price levels) is $55,200,000 Federal and $26,300,000 non-Federal. The Federal share of each periodic nourishment is 72.55 percent for Venice, and 15.4 percent for Longboat, of applicable nourishment costs. Local cooperation. Federal participation is subject to the conditions that responsible local authorities will: (a) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow areas, and relocations necessary for construction of the improvements; (b)provide a cash contribution equal to 29.3 percent of the first cost of construction, subject to any credit for eligible construction costs incurred by local interests, and exclusive of costs for lands, easements, and rights-of-way, relocations, and alterations, and exclusive of the cost of fill placed behind the Erosion Control Line (ECL), the final percentage to be based on shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction; (c) provide all costs of construction for nourishment of private lands and share in the costs of construction for public lands landward of the Erosion Control Line (ECL); (d) provide a cash contribution for periodic nourishment equal to 29.3 percent of the cost of each nourishment, such contribution to be made prior to each nourishment operation, and the final percentage to be based on shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction; (e) hold and save the United States free from damage due to the construction works, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors;(f) assure continued public ownership and administration of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; (g) provide without cost to the United States appropriate access and facilities, including parking and sanitation, necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based; (h) adopt appropriate ordinances, or provide other means, to insure the intended use of the beach fill areas; (i) control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (j) agrees to pay 100 percent of the operation, maintenance, and replacement and rehabilitation costs of the project, or functional element thereof. Non-Federal contribution for new work is $4,994,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Channel and canal cost was -$4,675. Beach renourishment cost was $500,000. Reconnaissance cost was $14,368. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost was $61,994 and $576 respectively. Condition at end offiscal year. Initial construction of 3.2 miles of beach fill was broken into two contracts. The first contract was completed in January 1995. The second 9-30 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT contract was completed in June 1996. Construction of an artificial reef was completed by the local sponsor in the winter of 1997 as mitigation. Audit underway to reimburse locals for Federal share of reef. 54. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Key West, FL; Lido Key, FL; Mullet Key, FL; Virginia Key and Key Biscayne, FL were deauthorized January 1, 1990 by the WRDA of 1988, P.L. 100-676. (See Table 9- D.) 55. BEACH EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization) Reports incurring costs during the fiscal year were Little Talbot Island, FL $5,682; Hwy 187, Pinones, PR $5,426,828; Former USCG Seaplane Base, Miami, FL $7,877; Puerto Nuevo Beach, PR $4,999. Beach erosion control activities pursuant to section III, Public Law 90-433, Mitigation of Shore Damages Attributable to Navigation Projects. No costs were incurred under the above authorization. Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Shoreline Erosion Control Act of 1074, Public Law 93-251. No costs were incurred under the above authorization. Flood Control 56. CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA Location. The project is generally located within the southeastern 18 counties of Florida covering an area of about 15,200 square miles. It is comprised of the Upper St. Johns River basin in the northeastern section of project, Kissimmee River basin in central section north of the Lake Okeechobee-Everglades area in the central and southwestern section, and the east coast Everglades area in southeastern section. Previous projects. Completed works for control of Lake Okeechobee were included in and constructed under the navigation project for Okeechobee Waterway, FL (formerly Caloosahatchee River and Lake Okeechobee drainage area, FL) and under provisions of River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930 and August 30, 1935. For further information, see Annual Reports for 1948 and 1949. Existing project. The authorized project is for flood relief and water conservation and provides principally for: an east coast protective levee extending from the Homestead area north to the eastern shore of Lake Okeechobee near the St. Lucie Canal; three conservation areas for water impoundment in the Everglades area west of the east coast protective levee with control structures to effect transfer of water as necessary; local protective works along the lower east coast; encirclement of the Lake Okeechobee agricultural area by levees and canals; enlargement of portions of Miami, North New River, Hillsboro, and West Palm Beach Canals; enlargement of the existing Lake Okeechobee levees and construction of new levees on the northeast and northwest shores of the lake; increased outlet capacity for improved control of Lake Okeechobee; floodway channels in the Kissimmee River basin, with suitable control structures to prevent over-drainage; an interrelated system of canals, levees, pumping stations, and structures in southwest Dade County to control water levels; and facilities for regulating floods in Upper St. Johns River basin; a system of canals and control structures for gravity drainage of Martin County and distribution of available water supplies to portions of Martin and St. Lucie Counties; and works to improve the supply, distribution, and conservation of water resources in central and southern Florida, including the Lake Okeechobee agricultural area, Everglades National Park, and other related areas. The project will provide water control and protection from recurrence of the devastating floodwaters from the Everglades and local sources, for the highly developed urban area along the lower east coast of Florida and for the productive agricultural areas around Lake Okeechobee (including towns around the lake), in the Upper St. Johns and Kissimmee River basins, and in South Dade County. The project includes a total of 990 miles of levees, 978 miles of canals, 30 pumping plants, 212 floodway control and diversion structures, 56 railroad bridge relocations, and 2 highway bridge relocations. 9-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 The project also provides that upon completion, local interests assume operation and maintenance of all completed works except levees, channels, locks, and control works for regulation of Lake Okeechobee and the main control structures of conservation areas, which will be operated and maintained by the United States. The principal features of the hurricane gates, constructed under previous projects for Okeechobee Waterway and maintained under existing project since July 1, 1950, are set forth in Table 9-Q. Also, see Table 9-N for principal features of locks and dams. Estimated cost for new work (October 1997 price levels) is $1,444,100,000 Federal and $666,700,000 Non- Federal, exclusive of river and harbor funds expended on previous projects.(See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. (See Table 9-R for local cash contribution.) Local interests must also: provide lands, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas; hold the United States free from damages; bear the cost of maintenance and operation of all works except those having to do with regulation of Lake Okeechobee and the main control structures of conservation areas; construct and maintain lateral drainage facilities; prohibit encroachment on flood-carrying capacity of the improved channels; and assume cost of all new highway bridges, relocations of existing bridges and alterations to utilities incident to construction of the project. In addition, for small boat navigation channels, local interests must provide, maintain, and operate adequate public landings, sanitary and access facilities, and establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the locks and channels by users thereof. Assurances of local cooperation have been accepted by the District Engineer for all items of work authorized to date. Non-Federal contributions for new work is $63,176,394. Operations and results during fiscal year. (See Table 9-S for work accomplished.) Operations and care. a. Features completed under previous navigation project for Okeechobee Waterway and being maintained under this project are: a levee about 70 miles long following in general the south shore of Lake Okeechobee and a north shore levee 15.8 miles long; spillways at Ortona and St. Lucie Locks; 5 hurricane gates; and 16 spillways along St. Lucie Canal. b. Features completed under existing project that are to be maintained with operation and maintenance funds are: (1) Levees 47, 48, 49 and 50 -- total length 63 miles and enlargement of existing levees L-D1, L-D2, L-D3, L-D4, and L-D9, (2) spillway structures S-10, S-11, S-12, S- 18C, S-77, and S-78 (3) C-43, Section 4 (Caloosahatchee River), and (4) W.P. Franklin Lock and Dam. In addition to the actual facilities listed above it is necessary under operation and maintenance to continue meteorological studies, water level records, stream gauging stations, etc., for proper regulation of the level of Lake Okeechobee and storage of water in Conservation Areas 1, 2 and 3. Corps of Engineers - The Corps of Engineers operates and maintains the major outlets to Lake Okeechobee and Water Conservation Area Nos. 1, 2A and 3A in central and southern Florida. South Florida Water Management District - SFWMD is responsible for operation and maintenance of the project facilities, including major pumping stations, spillways, locks (except on Okeechobee Waterway), levees and culverts. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preparation of the Comprehensive Review Study including Water Preserve Areas is underway. Programmed work is 75 percent complete. Engineering and design is underway for South Dade County, Bolles and Cross Canal GRR, C-51 Project, Lake Istokpoga GRR, East Cape and Homestead Canal Plug Repairs, and C-7, 8, and 9 GRR, and Manatee Protection. Construction of the Upper St. Johns Project is underway. C-11 construction was in FY 96 with C-111 spoil mound removal and S-332D pump station construction contract awards. The Federal Interagency Task Force on South Florida Ecosystem Management is providing assistance in expediting Corps projects, including C-111 and the Restudy. Manatee Protection Report was prepared. Construction General funds are being used for Project Modification Report preparation. (For status of work under construction at the end of the fiscal year see Table 9-P.) 57. DADE COUNTY, FL Location. Dade County is on the southeast coast of Florida. Project area consists of that part of the Atlantic shoreline of the county from Government Cut north to Bakers Haulover Inlet and at Haulover Beach Park. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11466.) 9-32 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Existing project. Project provides for a protective and recreational beach having a dune at elevation 11.5 feet and a level berm 50 feet wide at elevation 9 feet, mean low water, for beach erosion control and hurricane protection between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet; a protective and recreational beach with a berm elevation of 9 feet for beach erosion control at Haulover Beach Park; and Federal participation in the initial construction and in periodic nourishment of both the above reaches for the first 10 years of project life. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide in the area is 2.5 feet. Estimated cost of the project (October 1997 price levels) is $163,300,000 Federal cost and $147,800,000 non- Federal cost. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1968 (H 335/90/2). Local cooperation. Local interests must (a) contribute for the first cost of the work: between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet amounts ranging from 60.2 percent of the cost of the fill within the project limit with existing shorefront ownership, and 100 percent of the cost of fill required landward of the project limit; and for the work at Haulover Beach Park, contribute 21.3 percent of the entire first cost excluding costs for lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and preproject work, but including credit for preproject work; (b) contribute in cash for the first 10 years of project life, amounts ranging from 88.9 percent of the nourishment cost for the beach, with existing ownership, to 60.7 percent with public ownership, and the entire maintenance cost for dune, all between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet; (c) provide all lands and rights-of-way; (d) hold United States free from damages; (e) assure continued public ownership and use of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; (f) assure maintenance of the groin, and after 10 years of project life, periodic nourishment of the protective beach and maintenance of the dune during the economic life of the project; (g) assure that water pollution will not be permitted; (h) prevent removal or relocation by man of fill from the beach berm and dune; (i) prevent the erection of barriers to the littoral movement of material that would interfere with the nourishment of the beach; (j) maintain at the parks qualifying for 70 percent Federal participation a zone that excludes permanent human habitation; (k) at least annually inform interests affected that the project will not provide complete protection from a hurricane tide level equal to or higher in elevation than that of the hurricane of September 1926; and (1) establish in public ownership for public use the beaches within project limits as a requirement for Federal participation in the allocated beach erosion control costs of improvement of shores presently in private ownership. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted January 16, 1973. A supplemental agreement for Bal Harbour portion was approved June 30, 1976. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $38,357,335. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $3,000. Renourishment cost was $277,000. Engineering and design and construction management cost $1,699,000 and $67,000 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Continuing design for Bal Harbour. An EIS is underway for the construction of Sunny Isles modification. Local interests desire extension of the renourishment to include Haulover Beach. Also, there is diminishing sand sources. 58. DADE COUNTY, NORTH OF HAULOVER BEACH, FL Location. On the southeast coast of Florida. Project area consists of that part of the Atlantic shoreline extending 2.5 miles north of Haulover Beach Park. (See NOAA Nautical chart No. 11466.) Existing project. The existing shore protection project for Dade County provides for Federal participation in the cost of construction of a beach fill for the purpose of erosion control and hurricane protection along 9.3 miles of shore between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet and for the construction of a beach fill for the purpose of erosion control along the 1.2 miles of shore fronting Haulover Beach Park and provides for protection and nourishment of 2.5 miles of beach shore north of Haulover Beach Park and for extension of the period of Federal participation from 10 years to the life of the project. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Consistent with the cost-sharing and financing concepts agreed to by the administration and Senate Majority Leadership, local interests will be required to: provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way and relocations; pay 50 percent of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; pay 35 percent of the cost allocated to storm damage prevention; hold the United States free from damages; control water pollution; and furnish assurances that they will maintain continued 9-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based during economic life of project. Assurances of local cooperation have been requested from local sponsors. Non-federal contribution for new work was $8,082,927. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. No new work scheduled. 59. FOUR RIVER BASINS, FL Location. The Four River Basins area covers about 6,000 square miles within 14 counties in central and southwest peninsular Florida. Project includes all or part of the four main stream basins -- the Hillsborough, Oklawaha, Withlacoochee, and Peace Rivers -- and all of three smaller coastal basins north of Tampa, Florida, drained by the Pithlachascotee and Anclote Rivers and Lake Tarpon. Existing project. The authorized project provided for improvements for control of floods and drainage, and for conservation through construction of necessary canals, levees, reservoirs, and control structures. More specifically, the project provided for: Green Swamp Area -- a conservation area and 3 storage reservoirs with necessary canals and control structures; Hillsborough River -- 4 flood-storage reservoirs, with necessary channels, control structures and levees; Oklawaha River - -a levee on the north shore of Lake Apopka, improvement of parts of the river channel and a west bank levee below Moss Bluff lock and dam, and replacement of the lock and dam; Withlacoochee River -- one flood-storage reservoir with outlet canals and control structures; Peace River -- Peace Creek canal and control structures and improvements to the existing water control and drainage features; Gulf Coastal Areas-Lake Tarpon; outlet canal and control structure; Pithlachascotee River: reservoir with outlet canals and control structures. (See Table 9-T on Moss Bluff Lock.) Estimated cost for new work (October 1997 price level) is $179,000,000 Federal and $157,000,000 non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish all lands, and rights-of-way; provide all alterations or replacements of public and private utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), etc.; hold the United States free from damages; operate and maintain all project works after completion; construct and maintain such associated works as are necessary to realize benefits made available by the project works; and contribute in cash 17 percent of the first cost of construction and 50 percent of recreation costs. Non-Federal contribution for new work is $13,909,201. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost was $38,092. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project commenced April 18, 1966 and the scheduled work is 98 percent complete. Awaiting fiscal closeout of Flatwoods Phase I, before initiating Phase II. 60. PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, PR (This project authorized as Lago de Cerrillos, Lago de Portugues, and Channel Improvement at Ponce.) Location. Portugues and Bucana Rivers originate on the southern slopes of Cordillera Central divide of Puerto Rico and flow from this central ridge of the island to the Caribbean Sea. Their drainage areas are 22.6 and 31.4 square miles, respectively. Ponce, the second largest city in Puerto Rico, is located in the lower coastal area along Portugues River and is the only urban community in the two basins. Existing project. The authorized project provides for 2 multiple-purpose reservoirs for flood control, water supply, general recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement -- one on Portugues River and the other on Cerrillos River, a tributary to the Bucana River; enlargement of about 5.7 miles of the Bucana River, with an additional 0.2 mile long tieback levee at the upstream terminus of the improvement; enlargement of 2.1 miles of the Portugues River, with an additional 0.5 mile of tieback levee at the upstream terminus of the improvement; and a 1.3 mile diversion channel connecting Portugues River to lower Bucana River. Estimated cost of the project (October 1997 price levels) is $422,617,000 Federal and $141,383,000 non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from damages; operate and maintain all project works after completion; repay construction cost allocated to water supply in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958; pay one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; prohibit 9-34 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT discharge of inadequately treated sewage and other pollutants into the reservoir; and prevent encroachment on downstream channels. Assurances of local cooperation have not been completed, except for Cerrillos Reservoir which was signed March 15, 1982. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $7,125,899. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction contract for dams cost was $5,380,000. Cost for channels and canals was $249,000. Cultural resource preservation cost was $14,000. Building, grounds, and utilities cost was $239,000. Engineering and design and construction management cost $5,405,000 and -$239,000 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Continued grouting and initiated Portugues Office Building. 61. RIO DE LA PLATA, PR Location. The Rio de La Plata basin is located about 11 miles west of the San Juan metropolitan area along the north coast of Puerto Rico. The Rio de la Plata basin drains an area of 240 square miles through several towns and villages into the Atlantic Ocean. Existing project. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1990. It would provide 100 year protection upstream of PR Highway 2 and SPF protection down stream and calls for construction of 7.6 miles of levees. The plan includes the replacement of 3 bridges, recreation facilities, and mitigation for the loss of environmental habitats. The benefit-cost ratio is 1.6. Estimated cost (October 1997 price levels) is $63,300,000 Federal and $33,400,000 Non-Federal. Local cooperation. The project cooperation agreement was executed on 7 June 1995. The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Department of Natural and Environmental Resources, is the body authorized to represent the local interest and is responsible for complying with the following requirements: (1) provide a cash contribution equal to five percent of total project costs; (2) provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and dredged material disposal areas; (3) provide an additional cash payment when the sum of both items (1) and (2) are less than 25 percent of total project costs; (4) operate and maintain the project after completion, including accomplishment of any needed repairs or rehabilitation's of any of its components; (5) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction or subsequent maintenance of the project, expect due to damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (6) prevent future encroachments which might interfere with proper functioning of the project; (7) participate in and comply with applicable Federal flood plain management and flood insurance programs; and (8) (a) provide guidance and leadership to prevent unwise future development in the flood plain; and (b) recreation local cooperation requirements: (1) provide one-half of the separable first cost of post authorization planning and construction of recreation facilities and provide all land required for recreation; and (2) all costs and full responsibility for the operation, maintenance, replacement, and management of recreation lands and facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Relocations cost was $500,000. Engineering and design cost was $385,000. Condition at end offiscal year. In the process of finishing P&S and continuing relocations and real estate acquisition. 62. RIO PUERTO NUEVO, PR Location. The Rio Puerto Nuevo drainage basin is located within the San Juan Metropolitan Area along the northern coast of Puerto Rico. The basin joins the southeast side of San Juan Harbor and extends south and up into the foothills of the central mountains of Puerto Rico. The basin is traversed by the Rio Piedras, Rio Puerto Nuevo, Quebrada Margarita, Quebrada Josefina, Quebrada Dona Ana, Quebrada Vista, and Quebrada Guaracanal. Existing project. The authorized project for flood control includes improvements to 11.2 miles of the existing channel of Rio Puerto Nuevo and Rio Piedras and five tributaries of the Rio Puerto Nuevo drainage basin. The 25 square mile drainage basin drains into San Juan Harbor. Estimated cost of the project (October 1997 price levels) is $322,100,000 Federal and $107,600,000 non- Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide cash contribution equal to five percent of the total project costs; provide LERRD (except railroad bridge alterations);provide an additional cash payment when the sum of cash and LERRD are less than 25 percent of the total project costs; operate and maintain project works after completion; hold and save the United States free 9-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 from damages; prevent future encroachments; participate and comply with Federal flood plain management and flood insurance programs; provide guidance and leadership to prevent unwise future development in the flood plain; provide one-half of the separable first cost of post authorization planning and construction of recreation facilities; and all costs and full responsibility for operations, maintenance, replacement, and management of the recreation lands and facilities. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $8,670,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $1,016,000. Relocations cost was $300,000. Roads, railroads, and bridges cost was $1,000,000. Channels and canals cost was $10,934,000. Engineering and design cost was $2,816,000. Construction management cost was $1,319,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Contract No.1 for bulkheaded channel was awarded for $36 million and construction is underway. Detailed design work for the high velocity Margarita channel and first segment of Rio Piedras continues. Plans and specifications for construction of the earth trapezoidal Margarita channel is ongoing. 63. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Features transferred to the Central and Southern Florida Flood Control District and Southwest Florida Water Management District were inspected quarterly during the fiscal year at a total cost of $100,008. 64. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 9-E.) 65. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 685, 84th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). (See Table 9-V.) Emergency flood control activities -- repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $508,852 for the Disaster Preparedness Program. Emergency Operations cost was $457,661. Rehabilitation cost was $44,246. National Emergency Preparedness Program cost was $254,918. Emergency streambank and shoreline protection activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress as amended (Preauthorization). Federal cost for the fiscal year was Coordination Account $8,067; Bradenton Beach, FL $3,140; and Juan Mendez Channel, PR $220,253. General Investigations 66. SURVEYS Hired labor costs during the fiscal year were: navigation studies $1,700,078; flood damage prevention studies $517,707; shoreline protection studies $8,664; special studies $146,192; review of authorized projects $67,237; miscellaneous activities $32,816; and coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests $113,897; for a total cost of $1,399,433. 67. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The requirement for preparation of regular flood plain information studies has been rescinded. FPI studies that deal with land use changes will continue to be prepared. Flood Plain Management Services $45,084; Technical Services $99,317; Quick Responses $7,074; SE Florida Evacuation Study $823; Hurricane Evacuation Study VI $200; SE Florida HES Reanalysis $537; HES National Behavior Study $29; Puerto Rico East Coast HES $131; Florida Statewide Evacuation $300; Cedar Keys Hurricane Evacuation $3; Hurricane Evacuation Study Northern Puerto Rico $7,966; Hurricane Evacuation Study Western Puerto Rico $21,637; Big Cypress Seminole Reservation $1,111; Harney Pond $5,901; Indian Praire $-575; Seminole Floodway $2,750; General Hydrologic Studies $206; for a total cost of $192,493. 68. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Navigation cost was Miami Harbor Channel $33; Palm Valley Bridge $1,781, Hillsboro Inlet $284,031, Lake Worth Inlet $22,855, and St. Lucie Inlet $189,865. Beach 9-36 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT erosion cost was Brevard County $546,621 and Monroe County, FL $32,866. Local protection cost was Arecibo River, PR $109,337, Rio Nigua de Salinas, PR $153,468, and Rio de la Plata, PR $256. Total cost for Continuation of Planning and Engineering was $1,241,932. 69. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Navigation cost was Tampa Harbor Big Bend, FL $40,969, and San Juan Harbor, PR $240. Beach erosion control cost was Nassau County, FL $240,489, and St. Johns County, FL $67. Flood control cost was Guanajibo River, PR $572,659, Arecibo River $448,305, and Cedar Hammock (Wares Creek), Fl $219,714. Total cost for Advance Engineering and Design was $1,463,922. General Regulatory 70. PERMIT EVALUATION (R&H ACT of 1899; CWA of 1977; MPRSA of 1972) Location. Navigable waters of the United States, including tributary systems, headwaters and isolated waters, and ocean waters to the limits of the territorial seas. Existing Program. The program evaluates permit applications for work in navigable waters (dredging, filling, and other structures) of the United States, and the transportation of dredged material to the oceans for ocean disposal. Geographic coverage includes Florida, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Decision making criteria consist of the public interest review, Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines, and ocean dumping criteria. Local Cooperation. Joint application agreement with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) and the regional Water Management Districts (WMD) have been signed. Have developed a Programmatic General Permit with the FDEP and are in the process of expanding it. We are working closely with the FDEP on watershed/ecosystem management areas for the state. Joint application booklet with the Virgin Island Department of Planning and Natural Resources (DPNR) is finished. We are developing a joint federal/state process for mitigation banks in Florida. All involved agencies (FWS, EPA, NMFS, FDEP, and the WMDs) have embraced the Mitigation Bank Review Team (MBRT) approach to permitting as laid out in the Federal guidelines. The Federal agencies are in agreement on the credit/debit method. Operations and results during fiscal year. Permit evaluation cost was $6,512,237. 71. ENFORCEMENT (R&H ACT of 1899; CWA of 1977; MPRSA of 1972) Existing program. The program takes appropriate enforcement action against both unauthorized work requiring a permit and noncompliance findings on issued permits. Operation of the program is continuing to make increased use of alternative dispute resolution processes to remediate violations. Close coordination with and cooperation of Department of Justice continues, with development of consent orders and fines as appropriate. Local cooperation: Developed MOA agreement on enforcement with EPA Region II to cover Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands.. The local operating agreement with FDEP and WMD contains provisions for cooperative enforcement, within the limits of state and federal law. Operations and results during fiscal year. Cost incurred this fiscal year for enforcement was $527,181. 72. STUDIES (R&H Act of 1899) Location. Navigable waters of the United States in Florida, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Existing program. This program conducts studies to determine geographic extent of navigable waters of the United States, and establishment of danger or restricted zones in these waters. Local cooperation. This program is carried out with informal cooperation with the State of Florida and cooperation of other Department of Defense agencies needing restricted zones in which to conduct their defense related missions. In addition we are cooperating with the Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND), the local sponsor of the AIWW and the IWW, to update our criteria's for setback requirements for structures in the IWW and the AIWW to ensure the safety of navigation. 9-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Operations and results during fiscal year. Navigation studies cost was $30,116. Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment 73. KISSIMMEE RIVER, FLORIDA Location. The Kissimmee River Basin comprises 3,013 square miles, and extends from Orlando southward to Lake Okeechobee, the second largest freshwater lake in the United States. The area is bounded on the north by the lakes of the Orlando area, on the west by the Peace River Basin, on the south by Lake Okeechobee, and in the east by the Upper St. John's and the Taylor Creek-Nuddin Slough Basins. The watershed is about 105 miles long and has a maximum width of 35 miles. Existing Project. The purpose of this study is to determine the extent of Federal participation in the Level II Backfilling Plan, as developed by the South Florida Water Management District, for restoration of the Kissimmee River and flood plain ecosystem. It is expected that restoration will restore the ecological integrity of the river system. Environmental improvements through modification of operations for Lake Kissimmee, Cypress, and Hatchineha. The project will include canal and/or structure improvements and real estate acquisition. The recommended plan consists of backfilling approximately 29 miles of C-38. This will result in the restoration of almost 29,000 acres in the floodplain. Three structures will be removed and two bridges and associated utilities will be relocated. Real estate interests will be acquired for effected portions of the floodplain. Estimated cost of the project (October 1997 price level) for Kissimmee River (Upper and Lower Basins) $247,400,000 Federal and $404,500,000 non- Federal. Local Cooperation. The South Florida Water Management District, an agency of the State of Florida, is the feasibility study cost sharing partner, and has expressed its intent to be the project sponsor. Local cost for the Headwater Revitalization is to be credited towards the total project cost. The authorization calls for the restoration to be cost-shared 50%-50% and that the lands be credited toward the total cost of the Kissimmee River Restoration. A draft Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) has been reviewed by the sponsor and a letter of intent has been provided for the Headwaters Revitalization. LCA for the River Restoration project is scheduled for execution in May 1994. Non-Federal contribution amounted to $1,100,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $148,000. Fish and wildlife cost was $409,000. Floodway control structure cost was $4,158,000. Engineering and Design cost was $2,814,000. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Engineering and design and monitoring plan for Upper Basin features are underway. In the lower basin, two feature design memorandums are underway for the restoration of the Kissimmee River. Awarded Contract 3, S-65; Contract 4C, levee removal; Contract 4, Pool A spoil removal; and Contract 2, C-35 & 36 canal enlargement. 74. EVERGLADES SOUTH FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, FL Location. The area consisting of the lands and waters within the boundary of the South Florida Water Management District, including the Everglades, the Florida Keys, and the contiguous near-shore coastal waters of South Florida. Existing Project. The authorized project shall develop a comprehensive plan for the purpose of restoring, preserving, and protecting the South Florida Ecosystem. The comprehensive plan shall provide for the protection of water quality in, and the reduction of the loss of fresh water from, the Everglades. The comprehensive plan shall include such features as are necessary to provide for the water-related needs of the region, including flood control, the enhancement of water supplies, and other objectives served by the Central and Southern Florida Project. The comprehensive plan shall be developed in cooperation with the non-Federal sponsor and in consultation with the Task Force. Projects identified for design and construction of any Central and Southern Florida Project that are authorized, may use funds that are available provided that they will accelerate the restoration, preservation, and protection of the South Florida ecosystem; will be generally consistent with the conceptual framework specified in the report entitled "Conceptual Plan for the Central and Southern Florida Project Restudy"; and be compatible with the overall authorized purposes of the Central and Southern Florida Project. If it is determined, in cooperation with the non-Federal sponsor and the Task Force, that a 9-38 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT restoration project for the South Florida ecosystem will produce independent, immediate, and substantial restoration, preservation, and protection benefits, and will be generally consistent with the conceptual framework, the project may proceed expeditiously with the implementation of the restoration. Estimated cost of the project (October 1997 price level) $75,000,000 Federal and $75,000,000 non-Federal. Local Cooperation. The comprehensive plan shall be developed in cooperation with the non-Federal sponsor and in consultation with the Task Force. The non- Federal cost share is 50 percent, except for water quality which is 100 percent with the exclusion of Everglades restoration which is 50 percent. The value of lands or interests in land acquired by non-Federal interests will be included in the total cost of the activity and credited against the non-Federal share of the cost of the activity. The operation and maintenance of projects will be a non- Federal responsibility. Non-Federal contributions amount to $4,009,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $121,000. Levees and waterways cost was $9,292. Reconnaissance cost was $96,885. Feasibility cost $541,710. Engineering and design 430,478. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Report preparation for 35 potential projects is underway. 75. RESTORATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Restoration Activities Pursuant to Section 1135, Public Law 99-662. Fiscal year costs were Coordination Account Funds $6,263; Initial Appraisals $24,097; Munyon Island $- 17,858; La Esperanza $76,439; Peanut Island $102,156; Manatee Protection, Canaveral Lock $18,582; Sarasota Bay $4,873. Restoration Activities Pursuant to Sec 206, Public Law 104-303. Coordination Account Funds $959; Preliminary Restoration Plans $22,219; Aquatic Ecosystem $23,178. 9-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 9-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 1.Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) 2.Arecibo Harbor, PR (Federal Funds) 3.Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, VA and St.Johns River, FL 4.Bakers Haulover Inlet, FL (Federal Funds) 5.Canaveral Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 6.Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 2,604,000 670,000 3,804,402 844,409 - 82,000 39,412,500 (55,622) 144,434 39,399,174 1,128,0751 1,128,0751 4,301,431 4,301,431 - - - 361,2252 -- - - 361,2252 301,301 75,000 3,048,000 -10,000 10,727,042 308,143 75,859 3,023,822 17,764 10,725,770 243,2353 243,2353 185,688 185,688 6,862,800 1,046,600 1,365,000 6,866,000 10,369,638 1,353,591 1,593,412 6,309,299 3,599,000 2,963,566 5,649,560 3,991,000 3,984,095 3,559,341 5,643,304 4,027,017 171,941 695,788 408 - -375,348 (163) 1,103 38,484,3104 37,906,148 78,742,366 78,713,350 2,567,441 2,190,133 305,290 305,290 2,243,372 2,243,372 - 159,975 - 159,975 9-40 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 7.Charlotte Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) 8.Cross-Florida Barge Canal (Federal Funds) 9.Eau Gallie Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) 10.Fernandina Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 11.Fort Myers Beach Channel, FL (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 533,1695 533,1695 165,000 99,000 2,499,000 1,944,000 166,614 94,474 2,456,676 1,978,085 20,000 30,000 20,000 (6) 22,715 45,488 20,000 16,974 (763) 2,334 20,145,644 20,131,495 63,567,473 63,567,473 - 32,529,6806 3,386 32,516,907 9,627 9,627 2,137 2,137 1,768,000 1,393,830 798,000 3,830,000 1,788,068 1,403,250 769,210 3,828,284 20,000 19,738 - 40,000 490,000 500 0 505,491 4,639,0407 4,639,0407 38,090,010 38,057,949 935,000 935,000 158,1408 158,1408 1,536,131 1,511,622 9-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 12.Fort Pierce Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 13.Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, FL (Federal Funds) 14.Intracoastal Waterway Jacksonville to Miami, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 15.Jacksonville Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 3,080,500 856,000 (150,000) 2,856,790 1,097,691 (50,461) 5,424,500 5,417,853 572,000 277,048 510,000 780,000 575,826 274,298 455,008 811,417 1,991,000 465,000 1,352,897 1,012,618 28,813 104,297 10,272 128,000 86,000 137,000 172,000 130,165 60,677 162,166 167,882 1,343,000 2,724,700 1,496,000 2,936,000 1,288,042 2,697,909 1,513,913 2,900,112 4,288,000 7,786,000 5,583,000 4,692,000 4,313,791 7,742,496 5,614,015 4,636,411 8,198,238 8,166,740 2,503.387 2.498,659 8,112,557 9 8,112,557 9 7,243,259 10 7,238,811 10 19,251,598 " 19,251,598 " 51,499,382 12 51,387,458 12 61,000 61,000 47,596,278 13 47,596,278 13 96,897,998 14 96,818,245 14 102,813 102,813 927,654 15 927,654 5 25,000 25,000 9-42 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 16.Jacksonville Hbr. (Mill Cove), FL (Federal Funds) 17.Johns Pass, FL (Federal Funds) 18.Long Boat Pass, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 19.Manatee Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 20.Mayaguez Harbor, PR (Federal Funds) 21.Melbourne Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost - 4,104,000 764 - 4,094,741 82,098 16 82,098 16 75,000 77,015 - 35,000 - 35,685 75,000 11,000 1,145,000 81,170 10,937 1,143,281 - 1,920,712 - 1,920,323 - 1,020,233 - 1,020,233 2,040 3,753,186 3,753,162 - 172,324 - 172,324 (920,000) 3,440,000 603,100 376,000 141,135 2,912,775 1,348,294 76,252 - - 100,000 1,055,000 - - 78,469 1,062,354 25,000 2,413,153 148,790 - 2,308,658 278,285 6,112,100 5,796,936 1,155,000 1,140,821 - 2,586,943 - 2,586,943 - 168,187 - 168,187 - 1,061,561 - 1,061,561 17,696 17,696 634,864 634,864 9-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 22.Miami Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 23.New Pass Sarasota, FL (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 1,017,000 400,636 3,440,000 248,000 49,495,625 17 1,850,835 399,261 3,458,812 59,840 49,298,976 17 112,000 154,300 320,000 280,000 52,881 188,109 313,577 283,694 6,236,817 6,207,942 - 2,300,710 18 - 2,274,595 18 45,811 19 45,811 19 125,000 100,000 1,790,000 -50,000 123,803 95,273 1,760,491 -14,738 24.Okeechobee Waterway, FL (Federal Funds) 25.Oklawaha River, FL (Federal Funds) 26.Palm Beach Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) 27. Palm Valley Bridge, FL (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost - 21,756,418 20 - 21,756,418 20 3,518,000 4,270,900 3,425,000 7,025,000 3,302,685 4,649,233 3,454,609 7,003,440 74,105,421 21 74,091,655 21 - 315,264 22 - 315,264 22 104,000 127,000 80,500 46,000 99,798 125,476 83,449 42,965 2,849,076 23 2,842,791 - - - 6,924,021 24 - - - 6,911,204 24 2,305,000 1,703,000 2,215,000 2,127,000 25,685,946 25 2,317,688 1,613,619 2,268,681 1,985,109 25,505,392 25 449,100 25,000 25,000 451,000 583,378 28,853 23,382 193,768 1,367.100 1,108,086 9-44 Maint: Approp. Cost 6,745,926 6,743,968 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 28.Ponce de Leon Inlet, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 29.Ponce Harbor, PR (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 30.Port Everglades Harbor, Fl (Federal Funds) 31.Removal of Aquatic Growth (Federal Funds) 32. St. Augustine Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost - - - - 1,953,276 - - - - 1,953,276 50,000 255,482 245,000 1,405,000 21,345,420 47,947 245,932 230,286 1,391,092 21,301,367 (32,000) - 2,415,600 - 2,415,600 - 1,379,000 - 1,112,663 - 2,227,260 26 - 2,227,260 26 - 1,779,270 - 1,779,270 (668) 717,304 717,304 10,031 (107) - 90,000 279 47,667 - 54,426,666 27 - 54,426,666 27 95,000 278,000 136,651 247,493 2,312,878 2,281,600 3,806,000 3,700,000 5,965,000 3,088,000 67,472,137 3,795,707 3,626,023 5,958,507 3,139,877 67,420,447 - - - - 1,476,434 28 - - - - 1,476,434 28 255,000 3,291,000 172,000 -100,000 9,281,107 246,065 3,192,124 273,090 -94,813 9,277,666 9-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 33. St. Johns River, FL Jacksonville to Lake Harney (Federal Funds) 34. St. Lucie Inlet, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 35.San Juan Harbor, PR (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 36.Tampa Harbor, FL (Main Channel) (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 36.Tampa Harbor, FL (East Bay - Branch Channels) (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 2,046,000 622,471 (25,000) 2,047,289 510,532 83,092 461,395 143,981 - 1,171,243 29 - 1,171,243 29 - 1,300,299 30 - 1,300,299 30 - 7,766,689 31 - 7,766,489 31 - 10,176,956 -8,290 10,162,530 - 3,743,199 - 3,389,087 - 800,000 5,036,000 19,580,968 32 - 481,609 1,168,107 15,394,684 860,000 33,694 885,666 44,275 57 - 21,535,829 33 - 21,535,772 33 - 300,000 - 107,250 - (50) 300,000 107,250 - 173,767,440 34 - 173,767,440 34 296,000 3,159,197 4,472,440 5,910,000 54,047,732 35 309,006 3,099,521 4,509,614 5,818,645 53,931,534 35 - - - - 1,038,711 -- - - 1,038,711 (10,000) (187) 25,000 300,000 623 - 90,286 2,014,813 1,780,099 - 814,450 - 718,674 9-46 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 36. Tampa Harbor, FL (Port Sutton) (Federal Funds) 36. Tampa Harbor, FL (Big Bend) (Federal Funds) 40. Brevard County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 41. Broward County, FL Beach Erosion Control & Hillsboro Inlet, FL Navigation Proj. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 42. Duval County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 43. Ft. Pierce Beach, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 44.Indian River County, FL (Federal Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost (15,000) 9,249 190,415 145,000 40,000 118,686 40,968 (7,000) (2,619) 446,000 154,000 8,911 746 36,851 396,110 148,670 51,330 - 150,511 15,000 62,036 33,000 3,273 555,000 404,246 185,000 159,655 2,936,873 2,769.834 29,001 29,001 2,462,000 2,407,592 - 94,000 19,487,100 7,785 7,950 19,374,802 26,884 26,884 3,460,990 36 3,460,990 36 3,226,000 955,000 3,412,853 1,474,284 3,964,500 1,610,385 1,553,093 - 261,000 20,021,900 71,332 98,886 19,818,982 - - 16,895,567 302,982 1,839,396 16,895,567 85,000 (29,345) 595,000 2,123,000 123,951 21,661 468,591 383,661 (15,000) 360 (319) 4,171,655 2,305,907 - 385,681 - 385,681 9-47 908,000 904,411 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 45.Lee County, FL (Federal Funds) 46.Manatee County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 47.Martin County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 48.Nassau County, FL (Federal Funds) 49.Palm Beach County, FL (Federal Funds) 50.Palm Beach Island, FL (Federal Funds) 51.Pinellas County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 52. St. Johns County, FL (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 491,000 557,000 1,111,000 337,000 449,017 320,947 1,206,851 382,220 920,000 (25,000) 339,000 193,000 1,082,325 7,220 313,043 48,522 (462,652) - - - 246,300 4,667,400 138,900 393,000 174,576 4,621,034 245,164 398,447 5,030,000 4,766,963 239,500 282,011 216,258 206,899 9,153 357,000 314,900 15,851 290,732 240,489 3,201,000 3,051,416 6,267,600 6,096,958 3,337,348 3,337,348 5,445,600 5,439,221 5,030,000 4,776,322 1,748,553 1,607,875 (49,400) 20,000 200,000 5,312,000 14,552,434 145,718 31,140 171,287 5,335,393 14,518,539 - - - - 13,621 - - - - 13,621 12,760 - - 1,793,000 - 60 1,793,000 630,000 3,331,000 1,560,000 11,670,000 925,754 3,540,112 1,646,353 8,841,616 - 1,230,971 - 5,000,000 - 4,463,467 327,500 193,786 334,000 455,000 338,701 218,273 359,162 197,764 37,413,693 34,432,910 5,625 5,625 25,160,345 24,610,168 1,690,286 1,416,519 9-48 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 53.Sarasota County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 56.Central and Southern Florida (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 57. Dade County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 58.Dade County, N. of Haulover Beach, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 59.Four River Basins, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 60. Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 3,999,799 6,361,000 377,000 470,000 14,263,799 4,316,776 6,495,796 1,020,099 572,262 14,248,489 1,671,274 1,510,000 - 26,605 5,020,605 1,515,707 2,546,140 62,896 - 4,814,802 8,624,000 6,615,915 8,503,319 16,266,966 12,423,000 10,263,000 12,219,827 10,183,965 16,813,000 20,209,000 17,837,677 16,552,693 10,245,000 8,724,000 10,563,383 8,840,884 456,451,313 37 451,320,027 37 142,474,940 142,437,987 199,560 352,190 1,917,000 2,896,395 63,176,394 55,561 554,271 1,682,687 1,834,724 61,772,728 100,000 724,988 4,606,000 3,607,000 50,789,552 38 2,455,294 787,857 4,593,948 2,045,748 49,071,982 38 - - 2,500,000 875,958 1,017,755 4,131,499 (139,000) 4,000,000 (389) 38,357,335 39 34,357,158 39 6,801,611 6,801,611 8,082,927 346,719 8,082,927 (887,000) 685,000 69,000 151,000 76,255,095 40 393,944 640,914 153,901 38,092 76,138,772 40 115,144 11,536,400 9,660,000 8,232,000 11,939,000 13,093,152 9,677,447 10,839,511 10,108,478 493,175 156,326 2,335,000 1,713,000 492,544 463,304 1,535,598 939,591 13,909,201 13,900,291 371,345,968 371,266,127 7,125,899 5,042,062 9-49 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 61.Rio De La Plata, New Work: PR Approp. 450,000 229,000 418,000 479,000 5,546,998 (Federal Funds) Cost 340,000 258,605 462,859 385,371 5,417,576 62.Rio Puerto Nuevo, New Work: PR Approp. 1,747,096 8,170,000 11,173,000 14,146,000 44,018,096 (Federal Funds) Cost 1,745,925 7,931,655 11,464,449 13,126,044 42,690,520 (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. 850,000 2,220,000 2,100,000 3,500,000 8,670,000 Cost - 1,870,994 1,997,157 3,335,479 7,185,961 70.General Regulatory New Work: (Federal Funds) Approp. 7,115,000 7,086,000 7,231,000 7,295,000 62,386,200 41 Cost 6,995,379 6,176,766 7,061,780 7,240,244 61,554,162 41 73.Kissimmee River, FL New Work: (Federal Funds) Approp. 4,000,000 - - 2,817,000 34,896,000 Cost 2,663,570 3,716,384 5,130,869 7,898,500 31,048,176 (Contrib Funds) New Work: Approp. - - - 1,100,000 1,100,000 Cost - - - - - 74. Everglades South New Work: Florida Ecosystem Approp. - - - 4,009,000 4,009,000 Restoration, FL Cost - - - 1,199,364 1,199,364 1 Excludes $288,000 for contributed funds for new work 2 Includes $97,566 for previous project. 3 Excludes $243,235 contributed funds for new work 4 Excludes $700,000 contributed by NASA in connection with constnrction of lock. 5 Includes $113,000 for new work on previous project; excludes $15,563 expended for new work on existing project in Boca Grande entrancec hannel from contributedfu nds. 6 Excludes$ 113,744 for maintenancea nd operationso f dams. 7 Includes $905,221 expended for recreation facilities. 8 Includes$ 10,128 cost for reconnaissancea nd detailed projectr eportp reparedu nder Section 107 modification to the project. Excludes $1,095 contributed funds for new work. 9 Includes $515,479 for new work for previous projects: $8,472 for new work on Sunshine Skyway Channel; and $9,707 for new work for Cats Point Channel. Excludes $14,473 contributed funds for new work for Sunshine Skyway and Boca Ciega Bay channels. 10 Includes $450,749 for maintenance for previous project 11 Includes $94,776 for work for previous projects. Excludes $2,199,842 expended from public works funds for new work. 12 Includes $213,222 for maintenanceo n previous projectsa nd $3,179 operating andc are under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation. 13 Includes $3,520,137 new work on previous project and $290,013 for new work expended from public works funds. 14 Includes $543,399 maintenance on previous projects. 15 Includesu nusedc ontributedf undsof $64,136 returnedt ol ocal interests. 16 Project authorizedD ecember 2, 1964, by Chiefof Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 R&H Act and by Section 110 of the 1966R &H Act Costo f new work excludes $53,732 contributed funds. 17 Includes $5,502,126 expended from public work funds for new work Includes costs of $6,777,906 for recreation facilities. 18 Includes$ 381,47w9o rk-in-kinda nd $172,314 in costs for north jettryec reation facility. 19 Excludes $45,811 contributed funds for new work 20 Includes$ 21,101,9f1o9rn ew worku nder previousp roject, $626,925 for recreationalf acilities (Code 710), and $27,574 for reconnaissancea nd detaileprdo ject reporptr epared under Section 107 modification to the project 21 Includes $7,581,150 for maintenance for previous projects. Excludes $1,100) for maintenance from contributedf undson previousp rojects, $67,558 which representss ervices renderedw ithout reimbursement, and $113,744 for maintenance and operations of dams. 22 Includ$e3s,9 12 for new work for previous projects. 23 Includes$ 1 1,414 for operatianngd c are underpr ovisions for permanenti ndefinite appropriation. 24 Includes5 80,0ne0w0 w orkf rom public worksf unds. Excludes $509,506 contributedf unds. 25 Includes$ 30.000 form aintenancef rom public worksf unds. 26 Includes$ 11,58e8xp ended for restudy,b ute xcludes $21,960 expended for new workf rom contributedf unds. 27 Excludes$ 1,033,069 contributedf unds. 28 Includes $71,303 for new work on previous project. Excludes $137,500 contributed funds. 9-50 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 29 Baresford cutoff and completion of cutoffs and easing of baends in Putnam Lake and Volusia Counties in inactive status were deauthorized by Public Law 93-251 section 12. Includes $29,566 for new work under previous project 30 Includes $25,838 underprevious project. 31 Includes $26,689 for new work under previous project 32 Includes $747,684 for new work under previous project Excludes$ 100,000 expendedf or new work from contributed funds. 33 lndudes $44,730 for maintenance from public works funds under previous projec t 34 Includes $853,050 for new work fiom public works funds under previous project & $1,463,000 from emergency relief funds Excludes $270,466 for new work for Hillsborough River and $13,939 for new work from contributed funds 35 Includes $17,107 for maintenance under previous project. 36 Excludes work-in-kind. 37 Excludes $15,543 for property received without reimbursemenat nd R&H Funds, epended on previous projects (see cost and financial statement for Okeechobee Waterway, FL, project for these costs). Excludes $100,000 advancedb y local interestst oward federal costs. Includes$ 175,000 appopriationa nd $175.(88)c ost for new work at C&SF St Johns Water Management District 38 Includes $2,294,134 for reimbursement costs to Bal Harbor. 39 Excludes unused contributed funds of $17,969 returned to local interests. 40 Includes costs of $89,691 for recreation facilities at Moss Bluff and $2,638,272 at Lake Tarpon 41 Funds appropriatedu nder GeneralR egulatory Functions9 6X3126. 9-51 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 9-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 NAVIGATION PROJECTS Aug. 26, 1937 WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 Mar. 4, 1913 Jun. 20, 1939 Jul. 14, 1960 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text) Control and progressive eradication of obnoxious aquatic plants, and continued research to develop best method of control. TAMPA, FL May enter into a cooperative agreement under section 229 with the Museum of Science and Industry, Tampa, Fl to provide technical, planning, and design assistance to demonstrate the water quality functions found in wetlands, at an estimated total Federal cost of $500,000. WEST DADE, FL Conduct a reconnaissance study to determine the Federal interest in using the West Dade, FL, reuse facility to improve water quality in, and increase the supply of surface water to, the Everglades in order to enhance fish and wildlife habitat. ARECIBO HARBOR, PR (See Section 2 of Text) Construction of breakwater 1,200 feet long and dredging channel 25 feet deep and 400 feet wide with flare at entrance and widening at inner end to form a maneuvering area. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FL Project for navigation. Operation, maintenance, repair, replacement and rehabilitation shall be a non-Federal responsibility, and the non-Federal interest shall assume ownership for the bridge. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND THE ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 7 x 100 feet. Channel 12 feet deep and 90-150 feet wide with cutoffs. BAKERS HAULOVER, FL (See Section 4 of Text) Channel 11 x 200 feet in ocean entrance, thence 8 x 100 feet to Intracoastal Waterway; Marina basin 8 x 200 feet; reconstruction of jetties and protection of inlet shores. H.Doc. 251, 89th Cong.,lst sess. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104th Cong. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12,1996 104th Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 43, Cong.,75th 1st sess. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104th Cong. H.Doc. 898, 62nd Cong.,2d sess. H.Doc. 618, 75th Cong.,3d sess. H.Doc. 189, 86th Cong., 1st sess. 9-52 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL (See Section 5 of Text) Entrance channel jetties, a turning basin enclosed by a dike, and a barge canal with a lock. Maintain improved channel, turning basin, enlarge barge channel and lock, relocate dike, provide channel and turning basin west of 35-foot turning basin, construct and operate sand-transfer plant. Report of the Mitigation of fish and wildlife losses at Port Canaveral West Chief of Engineers Turning Basin Project. Oct. 1985 Report of the Project for navigation, Canaveral Harbor, FL, Chief of Engineers as modified by the letter of the Secretary Jul. 24, 1991 WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 Jun. 20, 1938 Jul. 14, 1960 Jul. 25, 1912 Mar. 3, 1925 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 dated Oct. 10, 1991 Modification of navigation project to reclassify the removal and replacement of stone protection on both sides of the channel as general navigation features. CHANNEL FROM NAPLES TO BIG MARCO PASS, FL (See Section 6 of Text) Interior channel 6 x 70 feet. Channel 12 x 150 feet from the Gulf to Gordon Pass, thence 10 x 100 feet to a point 400 feet south of U.S. Highway 41 Bridge, thence 10 x 70 feet to bridge and two turning basins. CHARLOTTE HARBOR, FL (See Section 7 of Text) Channel 24 x 300 feet through Gulf through Boca Grande entrance. Depth of 27 feet at entrance and width of 500 feet at bend. Channel 10 x 100 feet to Punta Gorda and a turning basin. Depth of 30 feet at entrance and width of 700 feet at bend. Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 9-53 H.Doc. 367, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 140, 87th Cong.,2d sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 102-580, Oct. 13, 1992 102nd Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104 th Cong. H.Doc. 596, 75th Cong.,3d sess. H.Doc. 183, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 699, 62nd Cong.,2d sess. H.Doc. 113, 66th Cong.,lst sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 1, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.95, 74thCong.,2dsess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 P.O. 675/77 Jul. 23, 1942 WRDA Nov. 17, 1986 WRDA Nov. 28, 1990 WRDA Oct. 31, 1992 Jun. 20, 1938 Jun. 14, 1880 Jul. 13, 1892 Mar. 2, 1907 Depth of 32 feet in entrance channel. H.Doc. 186, 81st Cong., 1st sess. CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL, FL (See Section 8 of Text) Barge Canal 12 x 150 feet. Establishment of the Cross Florida National Conservation Area. Deauthorized project purposes in the Act of July 23, 1942, transferred lands and completed facilities to the state, and required state payments to Citrus, Clay, Duval, Levy, Marion. and Putnam counties During the period November 28, 1992 and September 30, 1993, authorized and directed to enter into a contract with the St. Johns River Water Management District and the Southwest Florida Water Management District of the State of Florida for the continued operation and maintenance of the project. The maintenance shall be performed at a level of service that is necessary to ensure safe operating conditions and to prevent deterioration of the structures. No major rehabilitations or renovations shall be performed in such portions of the project during such period. Funding for the continued operation and maintenance of the barge canal project, shall not exceed $300,000 federal and the State of Florida shall pay a nonfederal share of $600,000 to fund the continued maintenance. EAU GALLIE HARBOR, FL (See Section 9 of Text) Channel 8 x 100 feet and a turning basin. FERNANDINA HARBOR, FL (See Section 10 of Text) Entrance jetties. Raising and extending jetties to provide a 19-foot depth. Improvement of inner harbor to obtain 20 to 24-foot depth and 400 to 600-foot channel width. H.Doc. 109, 79th Cong.,lst sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 101-640, Nov. 28, 1990, 101st Cong., 2d sess P.L. 102-580, Oct. 31, 1992, 102nd Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 497, 75th Cong.,3d sess. Annual Report 1879 Annual Report 1891 & 1896 H.Doc. 388, 59th Cong.,lst sess. 9-54 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Combining improvement of Fernandina Harbor and Cumberland Sound under the general heading of Fernandina Harbor. Mar. 3, 1925 Jun. 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 WRDA Nov. 28, 1990 Jul. 14, 1960 Auth. by Chief of Engineers Dec. 6, 1968 under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act Def. Act of Mar. 4, 1931 War Dept. Approp. Act, Mar. 4, 1933 Provided for a 26-foot channel. Provided for the 28-foot channel and turning basin. Provided for reducing the maximum width of turning basin from 1,000 to 800 feet, for shifting channel line in this vicinity vicinity 50 feet northwesterly and for including in authorized project small area dredged by Rayonier, Inc. Provided for 32-foot channel and turning basin. Redesignated location of turning basin until Section 107 (R&H Act of 1960) study is completed and the resulting. project constructed FORT MYERS BEACH, FL (See Section 11 of Text) 12 x 150 foot channel in San Carlos Bay, thence 11 x 125 feet in Matanzas Pass to upper shrimp terminals. Extension of 11 x 125 foot channel easterly about 2,000 feet to and including a turning basin adjacent to natural deep water in Matanzas Pass. FORT PIERCE HARBOR, FL (See Section 12 of Text) Expenditure of $20,000 for dredging channel, maintenance by local interests. Expenditure of up to $30,000 for dredging channel. H.Doc. 227, 68th Cong., lst sess. H.Doc. 548, 75th Cong.,3d sess. H.Doc. 284, 87th Cong.,lst sess. H.Doc. 662, 80th Cong.,2d sess. P.L. 101-640, Nov. 28, 1990 101st Cong., ?? sess. H.Doc. 183, 86th Cong.,lst sess. Specified in Act Specified in Act 9-55 Jun. 25, 1910 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Report of the Chief of Engineers Dec. 14, 1987 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 May 10-16, 1957 Auth. Mar. 1, 1962 by Senate and House Public. Works Comm Auth. by Chief of Engineers, Mar.l, 1963,. under Sec 107 of 1960 R&H Act Jan. 21, 1927 Maintaining channels, jetties, and revetments, and enlarging channels and turning basin to existing project dimensions. Deepening and enlarging channels and turning basin. Total cost of $6,742,000. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER TO ANCLOTE RIVER, FL (See Section 13 of Text) 9 x 100 foot channel; deepening channel at Casey's Pass to 9 feet and construction of highway bridge at Venice. Original route may be modified at no excess cost to U.S. Any route in Venice-Lemon Bay area may be used. Use of alternate Route C-1 in Venice-Lemon Bay area. Local interests to bear costs of Venice Avenue highway bridge and any other necessary crossing over Route C-1. Sunshine Skyway Channel to be improved and maintained to. 9 x 100 feet 6 x 80 foot channel in Boca Ciega Bay. H.Doc. 252, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 74th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 100-676,, Nov. 17, 1988 100th Cong., 2d sess H.Doc. 371, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 109, 85th Cong.,lst sess. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FL (See Section 14 of Text) Channel 8 x 75 feet from Jacksonville to Miami. H.Doc. 586, 69th Cong.,2d sess. Channel width of 100 feet. S.Doc. 71, 71st Cong., 2d sess. 9-56 Jul. 3, 1930 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized PARA Jun. 26, Operation and care of Palm Valley Bridge. 1934 Aug. 26, 1937 Turning basin at Jacksonville Beach. Mar. 2, 1945 Channel 12 x 125 feet. Mar. 2, 1945 Side channel and turning basin at Sebastian (deauthorized). Mar.2, 1945 Turning basin at Vero Beach. Jul. 3, 1958 Maintenance of side channel at Daytona Beach. Chief of Engineers Channel 10 x 125 feet from Ft. Pierce to Miami. Report of Jul. 22,, 1960,Mod. 12-foot channel JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL (See Section 15 of Text) ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL OPPOSITE THE CITY OF JACKSONVILLE Mar. 2, 1907 The 24-foot area from Hogan Creek to Florida East Coast Railroad bridge. Nov. 17, 1986 Deauthorized the 24-foot area from Hogan Creek to Florida East Coast Railroad bridge. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR (MILL COVE), FL (See Section 16 of Text) Report of the Enlarge weir structure and west opening controlling flow into Mill Chief of Engineers Cove, to reduce shoaling and improve navigation as well as Feb. 12,. 1982 circulation. WRDA Modification to carry out a project for mitigation consisting Oct. 12, 1996 of measures for flow and circulation improvement within. Mill Cove. 9-57 Documents Specified in Act H.Doc. 180, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 740, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 336, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 261, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 222, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc 663, 59th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 99-662,, Nov. 28, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104th Cong. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Auth. by Chief of Engineers Dec. 2, 1964 under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act and Sec. 110 of 1966 R&H Act JOHN'S PASS, FL (See Section 17 of Text) Channel 10 x 100 feet in gulf, 8 x 100 feet inside pass, 6 x 100 feet to IWW, 2.6 miles long. WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 Auth. by Chief of Engineers, Apr. 20, 1976 under Sec. 107 of 1960 LAKE WORTH INLET, FL Project for navigation and shoreline protection subject to final report to be completed not later than December 31, 1996. LONGBOAT PASS, FL (See Section 18 of Text) 12 x 150 foot entrance channel from Gulf of Mexico to Longboat Bridge; 10 x 100 foot channel from Longboat Bridge northeasterly to IWW; channel from north channel to Cortez Bridge. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104th Cong. R&H Act, as amended MANATEE HARBOR, FL (See Section 19 of Text) Report of the Provide for maintenance of the existing 40-foot deep draft Chief of Engineers navigation channel and turning basin from Tampa Bay May 12, 1980 to Port Manatee. Initial construction of a widener at Manatee Harbor and deepen area adjacent to berthing area. WRDA Nov. 28, 1990 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Modified the project for navigation authorized by the WRDA of 1986 to construct substantially in accordance with the post authorization change report dated April 1990. MAYAGUEZ HARBOR, PR (See Section 20 of Text) Approach channel 30 feet deep to and along deep water terminal. MELBOURNE HARBOR, FL (See Section 21 of Text) Channel 8 x 100 feet and a turning basin. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L.101-640, Nov. 28, 1990, 101st Cong., ?? sess. H.Doc. 215, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. & River and Harbor Committee Doc. 1,73rd Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 390, 74th Cong., 2d sess. 9-58 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents MIAMI HARBOR, FL (See Section 22 of Text) MIAMI RIVER The 15-foot channel in Miami River, 150 feet wide at the mouth. Specified in Act PWA Program Sep. 6, 1933 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 3, 1925 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 The channel at Dinner Key Airport. An 18-foot channel in a land cut across the peninsula and construction of the north jetty. Construction of the south jetty and increase of channel width to 100 feet. Modification of local cooperation requirements imposed by the Act of July 25, 1912. A channel 25 feet deep with present widths from the ocean to Biscayne Bay, thence 200 feet wide across the bay to but not including the municipal turning basin, and extension of both jetties. A channel width of 300 feet across the bay and enlarging the municipal turning basin, with expenditures thereon limited. to $200,000 A depth of 30 feet from the ocean to and in the turning basin, with the existing authorized project widths, including the 300-foot width in the channel across the bay. Extending the turning basin 200 feet to the southward. The Virginia Key improvement. S.Doc. 95, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. and Specified in Act H.Doc. 622, 56th Cong., 1st sess. (Annual Report 1900, p. 1987) Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 516, 67th Cong.,4th sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 15, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Sen. Comm. Print. 73rd Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 86, 74th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 251, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 9-59 Jul. 3, 1930 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 For incorporation of the project for Miami River in that for Miami Harbor, the widening at the mouth of Miami River to existing project widths; the channels from the mouth of Miami River to the turning basin and to Government Cut; and the channel from Miami River to the harbor of refuge, provided that local interests contribute one-third of the cost. Jul. 14, 1960 Deletion of Virginia Key development and the Dinner Key, approach channel widening the existing ship channel by easing the ocean bend and increasing the width of the 300-foot wide section to 500 feet, enlarging the existing turning basin 300 feet along both the south and northeasterly sides, and dredging a turning basin along the north side of Fisher Island about 39 acres in extent and 30 feet in depth. Aug. 13, 1968 Enlarging existing entrance channel to 38 x 500 feet, deepening existing 400-foot wide channel across Biscayne Bay to 36 feet; deepening existing turning basins at Biscayne Boulevard terminal and Fisher Island to 36 feet. WRDA Deauthorized the widening at the mouth of Miami River to Nov. 17, 1986 existing project widths; and the channels from the mouth of Miami River to the turning basin, to Government Cut, and to a harbor of refuge in Palmer Lake. Report of the The project for navigation, Miami Harbor Channel. Chief of Engineers Sep. 25, 1989 WRDA The project for navigation, Miami Harbor Channel subject Oct. 12, 1996 to a final report to be completed no later than 31 December 1996. NEW PASS, SARASOTA, FL (See Section 23 of Text) Auth. by Chief 10 x 150 foot entrance channel; 8 x 100 foot inner channels; and of Engineers 8-foot deep turning basins at Payne Terminal and City Pier. Apr. 20, 1964 under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FL (See Section 24 of Text) PARA Jun. 26, Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds 1934 from R&H appropriations. H.Doc. 91, 79th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 71, 85th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 93, 90th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 101-640, Nov. 28, 1990, 101st Cong, ?? sess. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104th, Cong Specified in Act 9-60 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Aug. 26, 1937 New lock and weir structure in St. Lucie Canal. Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 WRDA Nov. 17, 1986 Auth. by Chief of Engineers Nov. 5, 1968, under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act Sep. 19, 1890 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 1910 Jul. 25, 1912 Jul. 27, 1916 PARA Jun. 26, 1934 WRDA Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 13, 1934 Deepening to 8 feet from Ft. Myers to Jacksonville-Miami waterway near Stuart via channel across lake from Clewiston. Channel to yacht basin at Ft. Myers and a basin at Stuart. Deauthorized basin at Stuart. Documents Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 696, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 736, 79th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662,, Nov. 17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. Enlarge existing 8 x 90 foot section of Okeechobee Waterway for about 5 miles upstream from Ft. Myers to 10 x 100 feet. OKLAWAHA RIVER, FL (See Section 25 of Text) Clearing obstructions for channel 4 feet deep from mouth to Leesburg. Channel 6 feet deep from mouth to head of Silver Springs Run. Maintenance of levels in the lakes at head of river. Acceptance of certain artificial waterways in lieu of portions of natural river bed. Operation and care of lock and dam provided for with funds from appropriations for rivers and harbors. Deauthorized channel 6 feet deep from mouth to head of Silver Springs Run PALM BEACH HARBOR, FL (See Section 26 of Text) Maintenance of improvement previously constructed by local interests. Annual Report 1889, p.1360 H.Doc. 782, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Acts Specified in Act Specified in Act P.L. 99-662,, Nov. 17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 185, 73rd Cong., 2d sess. 9-61 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Deepening the channels and turning basin, as constructed by local of interests, to 20 feet. Authorized the work previously approved by Public Works Administration, and widening the channels to existing project dimensions, enlarging the 700-foot square turning basin eastward removing the obstructive point on south side of the and inlet, revetting the banks of the inlet restoring existing jetties. Deepening the channels and turning basin to 25 feet. Extending the turning basin 550 feet southward over a 900-foot width, with a flare to the east; provided that local interests may be reimbursed not to exceed $305,000 for work done by them on this modification subsequent to July 1, 1949. An entrance channel 35 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 0.8 mile long merging with an inner channel 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 0.3 mile long, thence flaring into a turning basin, 1,400 feet north-south by a minimum of 1,200 feet east-west. Report of the Assume maintenance of locally expanded turning basin to Chief of Engineers a depth of 25 feet on north side of existing basin. Dec. 10, 1985 WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 Oct. 27, 1965 PALM VALLEY BRIDGE, FL (See Section 27 of Text) Replacement of a two lane bridge. PONCE DE LEON INLET, FL (See Section 28 of Text) Widening and deepening channels; jetties on north and south sides of inlet; a weir in the north jetty and an impoundment. basin inside the weir Dec. 10, 1934 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 P.L. 104-303 Oct. 12, 1996 104th Cong. H.Doc. 74, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 9-62 Recommended by Chief Engineers to Public Works Administration Oct. 17, 1934 H.Doc. 185, 73rd Cong., 2d sess. and Rivers and Harbors Comm. H. Doc. 42, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 530, 78th Cong., Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 704, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 283, 86th Cong., 1st sess. (contains latest published map) P.L. 99-662, Nov.17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 H.R. Sep. 23, 1976, S.R. Oct. 1, 1976 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 20, 1938 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 3, 1958 H.R. May 9, 1974; S.R. May 31, 1974 Report of the Chief of Engineers Sep. 23, 1991 PONCE HARBOR, PR (See Section 29 of Text) Dredging 3 continuous areas, aggregating 153 acres, to depths of 30, 18, and 9 feet, and construction of a seawall, costs to be shared by U.S. and local interests. Modified conditions of local cooperation to provide that U.S. undertake all dredging at Federal expense and return local funds previously contributed for dredging, all other portions of the improvement hereafter to be at the expense of local interests. Eliminate previously authorized 9-foot dredging area, and provided for dredging 30-foot depth area and 18 acres off the municipal pier and for construction of the breakwater off Punta Carenero. Eliminate previously authorized 18-foot and a portion of the 30-foot project outside the proposed 36-foot and a portion adjacent to the municipal bulkhead. Channel 36 x 600 feet from Caribbean Sea to harbor; channel 36 x 400 feet into harbor; and a 36-foot turning basin. PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FL (See Section 30 of Text) Maintenance of harbor constructed by local interests. Enlarge entrance channel and complete turning basin to 1,200 feet square. Widen turning basin 350 feet on north side. Widen turning basin 200 feet on north side, 500 feet on south side and enlarge flare at entrance channel. Deepen and widen entrance channel on a new alignment and increase turning basin in size and depth. Deepen and widen entrance channel, enlarge turning basin, widen Pier 7 channel, maintenance of Berth 18 channel, and planning for a south jetty fishing walkway with construction contingent upon need as developed by detailed post authorization studies. Project for navigation. H.Doc. 532, 67th Cong., 4th sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 18, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 745, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 532, 94th Cong., Cong., 2d sess. Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 25, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 545, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 768, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 346, 85th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 144, 93rd Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 102-580, Oct.,31 1992 102nd Cong., 2d sess. 9-63 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Jun. 20, 1938 May 17, 1950 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1919 Jun. 14, 1880 Jun. 25, 1910 Jul. 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA (See Section 31 of Text) Construction and operation of a suitable vessel and use of log booms for removal of water hyacinths in the navigable waters of the State. Extermination and removal of water hyacinths by any mechanical, chemical or other means. Prohibits use of any chemical process injurious to cattle. ST. AUGUSTINE HARBOR, FL (See Section 32 of Text) Channel 27 x 200 feet protected by a groin. Channel 16 x 200 feet across bar, and thence 12 feet deep to Intracoastal Waterway; jetty on south side of inlet; future landward extension of groin and jetty; and channel 10 x 100 feet in San Sebastian River. ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL, JACKSONVILLE TO LAKE HARNEY (See Section 33 of Text) A channel 13 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Jacksonville to Palatka. The improvement of Deep Creek. Two jetties at Volusia Bar (Maintenance only; new work completed under previous project). A channel 100 feet wide, 8 feet deep from Palatka to Sanford with a side channel to Enterprise, and thence 5 feet deep to Lake Harney. Cutoffs at Butcher Bend, Shake Creek, and Starks Landing, and easing bends at other points. A channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Palatka to Sanford, with a side channel to Enterprise and with cutoffs and easing of bends. (Cutoffs deauthorized) Annual Report 1899 Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 555, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 133, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 523, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1899 p. 1343 H.Doc. 699, 63rd Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report for 1879, pp. 795-798 H.Doc. 1111, 60th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 691, 69th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 603, 76th Cong., 3d sess. 9-64 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Mar. 2, 1945 Nov. 7, 1966 H.R. May 9, 1974 S.R. May 31, 1974 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 22, 1922 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Combining the two projects above into a single project for St. Johns River, FL, Jacksonville to Lake Harney, and for a cutoff 5 feet deep and 75 feet wide between Lake Monroe and the vicinity of Osteen Bridge (Woodruff Creek Cutoff). A channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Palatka to Sanford, and in the branch to Enterprise. ST. LUCIE INLET, FL (See Section 34 of Text) Channel 10 x 200 feet. Modification to maintain existing channel 6 x 100 feet. Extending north jetty and modifying existing jetty to provide a sand bypass weir section; excavation of sand impoundment basin; construction of south jetty with a walkway for recreational fishing; channel 10 x 500 feet through bar cut, tapering to 150 feet through the inlet, and 100 feet and 7 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway; and transfer of 380,000 cubic yards of material to the south beach during each two-year maintenance period. SAN JUAN HARBOR, PR (See Section 35 of Text) Anchorage (inner harbor) area of 206 acres and San Antonio Channel to 30-foot depth. Substitution of a 68-acre area 30 feet deep along southeasterly side of anchorage area, for one 25 acres in extent and of same depth extending easterly from eastern end of the San Antonio project channel. Modified condition of local cooperation. H.Doc. 445, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 208, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 391, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 508, 89th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 294, 93rd Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 865, 63rd Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act H.Doc. 45, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Entrance channel across outer bar 38 feet deep and 800 feet wide, and thence across bay to anchorage area (Anegado Reach Channel) 30 feet deep and 700 feet wide and increasing anchorage area to 239 acres to 30-foot depth. R&H Comm. Doc. 38, 74th Cong., 1st sess. 9-65 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 17, 1940 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 3, 1958 Aug. 4, 1976 Widening Anegado Reach Channel and increasing anchorage. area to 329 acres Removal to 8-foot depth of Anegado, Largo, and Capitanejo Shoals, and dredging to 30-foot depth the entrance channel and turning basin to the Graving Dock. Maintenance of the 30-foot depth entrance channel and turning basin to the Army Terminal. Deepening portions of entrance and approach channels and basins to Army Terminal and San Antonio Pier areas to 35-45 feet; new 32- foot depth Puerto Nuevo Channel; new 36-foot depth anchorage. A bar channel 48 x 800 feet, shifting the centerline 350 feet west; deepening Anegado Channel in steps from 46 to 40 feet while reducing width to 800 feet; deepening Army Terminal Channel and turning basin to 40 feet while widening the channel to 450 feet; deepening Puerto Nuevo Channel to 40 feet and widening it to 400 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel to 40 feet at existing 400-foot width; deepening San Antonio Channel to 38 feet at varying widths, minimum of 500 feet; deepening cruise ship basin at 30 x 250 feet; provide a 38-foot depth in Anchorage Area "E" with irregular width; six mooring dolphins for vessels using the area. R&H Comm. Doc. 42, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 364, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act H.Doc. 38, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 574, 94th Cong., 2d sess. Report of the Modification of the authorized project to provide the deepening Chief of Engineers of the Bar Channel to 48 feet and shifting its alignment 350 feet Dec. 23, 1982 to the west; deepening Anegado, and Army Terminal to 40 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel, and Cruise Ship Basin, Puerto Nuevo Channel, and San Antonio Channel to 36 feet; and deepening Anchorage Area "E" to 38 feet while reducing its size and constructing six mooring dolphins within its limits. A 1,500-foot long extension to San Antonio Channel would be added to the Federal project and Sabana approach deepened to 32 feet. WRDA Modification of the project to deepen the bar channel to depths Oct. 12, 1996 varying from 49 feet to 56 feet below mean low water with other modifications to authorized interior channels as described in the General Reevaluation Report and Environmental Assessment dated March 1994. P.L. 99-662 Nov. 17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 104-303, Oct.12, 1996 104th Cong. 9-66 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents TAMPA HARBOR, FL (See Section 36 of Text) TAMPA BAY For a channel 27 feet deep from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Tampa, 500 feet wide across the bar and 300 feet wide in the bay. For a channel depth of 26 feet with sufficient width from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Tampa. TAMPA AND HILLSBOROUGH BAYS For a depth of 24 feet in Hillsborough Bay. For a 27-foot depth from Gulf of Mexico up to and in the several channels of Hillsborough Bay, the widths to be 500 feet on the bar, 300 feet in Tampa Bay, Ybor, and Garrison Channels, and 200 feet in Hillsborough Bay, Sparkman, and Seddon Channels, with turning basins at the mouth of Hillsborough and at Ybor Estuary. HILLSBOROUGH RIVER Mar. 3, 1899 For a 12 x 200 foot channel to within 100 feet of the Lafayette St. highway bridge (maintenance only; new work completed under a previous project under title Improving Hillsborough Bay, FL). H.Doc. 52, 55th Cong., 3d sess. (Also printed in Annual Report 1899, p. 1640) Channel dimensions specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 634, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 634, 61st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 545, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1998, pp 1357- 1360 Sep. 22, 1922 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 TAMPA HARBOR, FL Consolidation of the above projects to form a single project for Tampa Harbor. Increasing the depth of Egmont Channel to 29 feet and the width of Sparkman Channel to 300 feet. For a depth of 32 feet and a width of 600 feet on Egmont Bar, a depth of 30 feet and a width of 400 feet in Mullet Key Cut, and a depth of 30 feet and a width of 300 feet in all other project channels in Tampa Harbor (except in Hillsborough River and in the channel leading to Alafia River); and for a turning basin 2,000 feet long and 500 feet in maximum width at the entrance to the Port Tampa terminals. Specified in Act H.Doc. 100, 70th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 22, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. 9-67 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 3, 1905 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 20, 1938 Jun. 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 For widening the bend between Sparkman Channel and Cut D of Hillsborough Bay Channel by 250 feet; widening Ybor Channel to 400 feet and extending the turning basin at the west end of Garrison Channel (mouth of Hillsborough River) easterly for 300 feet. For construction of a breakwater at Peter O. Knight Field, Davis Islands, its maintenance to be assumed by local interest. For widening Sparkman Channel to 400 feet and Ybor Channel to 500 feet; widening the bend between Sparkman and Garrison Channels an additional 250 feet to extend the turning basin westerly and widening the bend between Seddon and Garrison Channels by 150 feet (in lieu of 300 feet previously authorized) to extend the turning basin easterly. For a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide in the Hillsborough River for about 2.4 miles above the upper end of the existing 12-foot channel, and for the removal of obstructions thence to the Florida Avenue Bridge. For a channel 25 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Hillsborough Bay channel to and including a turning basin in the Alafia River. (Revoked by Act of May 17, 1950). For deepening Egmont Channel to 36 feet; enlarging Mullet Key Cut, Tampa Bay Channel, Hillsborough Bay Channel, Port Tampa Channel and Port Tampa turning basin to present project dimensions; deepening Sparkman Channel and Ybor turning basin to 34 feet; a channel 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Hillsborough Bay Channel to and including a turning basin in Alafia River, 700 feet wide and 1,200 feet long (in lieu of the improvement previously authorized); and substantial widening at entrance, bends, and turns. Extended removal of obstructions in Hillsborough River to City Water Works Dam. Maintenance of cleared channel to be assumed by local interests. Channel and turning basin at Port Sutton 30 feet deep, Ybor Channel 34 x 400 feet. S.Doc. 164, 75th Cong., 3d sess. Sen. Comm. Print. 76th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 183, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 119, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 16, 77th, Cong., Ist sess. H.Doc. 258, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 567, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 529, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 9-68 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Dec. 31, 1970 For federal maintenance of Port Sutton Channel, 280 feet wide and H.Doc. 150, 91st an irregularly shaped turning basin both to a depth of 34 feet. Cong., 1st sess. Do. Enlarge entrance channel across Egmont Bar to 46 x 700 feet from the H.Doc. 401, 91st Gulf to Mullet Key. Cong.,2d sess. Do. Enlarge Mullet Key Cut Channel to 44 x 600 feet. Do. Do. Enlarge Tampa Bay Channel to 44 x 500 feet from Mullet Key Cut Do. through Tampa Bay to the junction of Hillsborough Bay and Port Tampa Channels. Do. Enlarge Hillsborough Bay Channel to 44 x 500 feet from the junction Do. with Tampa Bay and Port Tampa Channels to the junction with Port Sutton entrance channel, and thence deepening to a depth of 42 feet at the existing width of 400 feet to the junction with Seddon and Sparkman Channels. Do. Enlarge Port Sutton entrance channel to 44 x 400 feet. Do. Do. Enlarge Port Sutton turning basin to a depth of 44 feet and a Do. turning diameter of 1,200 feet. Do. Deepening Sparkman Channel to 42 x 400 feet. Do. Do. Deepening Ybor Channel to 40 x 300 feet. Do. Do. Enlarge turning basin at the entrance to Ybor Channel to a depth of 42 Do. feet and an additional width of 200 feet on the southwest edge of the present basin. Do. Deepening Port Tampa Channel to 42 feet at its existing width from the Do. junction with Hillsborough and Tampa Bay Channels to the turning basin. Do. Deepening the Port Tampa turning basin to 42 feet over its existing Do. length of 2,000 feet and width of 900 feet. Do. An entrance channel in East Bay 44 x 400 feet and 500 feet north from Do. the Port Sutton turning basin for a distance of about 2,000 feet. Do. A turning basin in East Bay at a depth of 44 feet and with a turning Do. diameter of 1,200 feet. 9-69 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents An approach channel in East Bay 44 x 300 feet north from the East Bay turning basin for a distance of about 2,500 feet. Maintenance of Port Sutton Terminal channel to 44 x 200 feet for a distance of 4,000 feet. Maintenance of East Bay channel to 34 x 300 feet for a distance of 5,500 feet. Report of the Port Sutton Channel deepening to 43 feet for a distance of 3,700 Chief of Engineers feet and a width of 200 feet. Mar. 28, 1988 WRDA Nov. 28, 1990 Do. Do. H.Doc. 236, 99th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 100-676, Nov. 17,1988, 100th Cong., 2d sess. Maintenance of Alafia Channel to a depth of 34 feet, if a Non-Federal Sponsor agrees to reimburse the Secretary TAMPA HARBOR BRANCH CHANNELS, FL Report of the Enlarging Hillsborough Bay Cut D, Sparkman Channel, Port Chief of Engineers Tampa Channel and existing turning basins at the entrance to Jan. 25, 1979 Ybor Channel and at Port Tampa, all to a depth of 41 feet with varying lengths and widths and deepening Ybor Channel to a depth of 39 feet. This work will be associated with the Main Channel deepening. TAMPA HARBOR EAST BAY CHANNEL, FL WRDA Maintenance dredging at an average annual cost of $471,000. Nov.17, 1986 BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS BREVARD COUNTY, FL (See Section 40 of Text) Aug. 13, 1968 Federal participation in cost of shore protection project. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 99-662, Nov.17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 352, 90th Cong.,2d sess. WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 Shoreline protection project for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the project subject to completion of report no later than Dec. 13, 1996. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104th Cong. 9-70 Do. Do. Aug. 15, 1985 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 WRDA Nov. 17, 1986 WRDA Nov. 28, 1990 WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 BROWARD COUNTY, FL BEACH EROSION CONTROL AND HILLSBORO INLET, FL, NAVIGATION PROJECT (See Section 41 of Text) Improvement for beach erosion control in Broward County, FL and a combined beach erosion and navigation improvement to Hillsboro Inlet and the shore south thereof to Port Everglades. Deauthorized navigation improvement to Hillsboro Inlet. Continued authorization for Hillsboro Inlet dredging for 5 years. Periodic beach nourishment for a period of 50 years beginning on the date of initiation of construction of segments II and III. H.Doc. 91, 89th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 101-640, Nov. 28, 1990 101st Cong., 2d sess P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 CHARLOTTE COUNTY, FL Report of the Shoreline protection. P.L. 99-662, Chief of Engineers Nov. 12, 1986 2 Apr. 1982 99th Cong., 2d sess. DADE COUNTY, FL (See Section 57 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection and hurricaneflood control project. DADE COUNTY-NORTH OF HAULOVER BEACH, FL (See Section 57 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection and hurricaneflood control project. Report of the Extending of existing shore protection project for Dade County to Chief of Engineers provide for protective beach fill and subsequent nourishment Dec. 17, 1983 along 2.5 miles of shore north of Haulover Beach Park. H.Doc. 335, 90th Cong., Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 236, 99th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 99-662 Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess Oct. 27, 1965 River and Harbor Act of 1965 DUVAL COUNTY, FL (See Section 42 of Text) Federal participation in cost of local shore protection project. FORT PIERCE BEACH, FL (See Section 43 of Text) Project for beach erosion control. H.Doc. 273, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 9-71 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 15, 1985 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 WRDA Nov.17, 1986 Dec. 31, 1970 WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 S.R. May 31, 1974 and H.R. Nov. 20, 1975 WRDA Nov. 28, 1990 Periodic beach nourishment for a period of 50 years beginning on the date of initiation of construction. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FL (See Section 44 of Text) The plans provide for a 2.65 mile beach fill along the ocean shore of Vero Beach, a 1.7 mile beach fill along the ocean shore of Sebastian Inlet State Park and for periodic nourishment of the new beaches. LEE COUNTY, FL (See Section 45 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection project. Modification of the project for shoreline protection, Captiva Island, to reimburse the non-Federal interest for beach nourishment work carried out by such interest as if such work occurred after execution. of the agreement. Complete a review not later than 6 months after enactment of this Act to determine if periodic beach nourishment is necessary for Captiva Island for a period of 50 years beginning on the date of initiation of construction. MANATEE COUNTY, FL (See Section 46 of Text) The plan provides for a level berm 50 feet wide at an elevation 6 feet (MLW) along 3.2 miles of shore on Anna Maria Island and nourishment of entire Gulf shore of that island as needed throughout project life. MARTIN COUNTY, FL (See Section 47 of Text) Periodic nourishment over the 50 year life of the project. MONROE COUNTY, FL Report of the Modification of existing project from 6,200-foot long to 8,770-foot Chief of Engineers long beach fill stabilized with 2 groins and periodic nourishment. Apr. 22, 1984 Report of the Chief of Engineers May 19, 1986 NASSAU COUNTY, FL(See Section 48 of Text) Improvement for beach erosion control on Amelia Island P.L. 104-303, Oct.12, 1996 104th Cong. P.L. 99-662, Nov.17, 1986. 99th Cong., 2d sess H.Doc. 395, 91st Cong., 2nd sess. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104th Cong. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104th Cong. S.Doc. 37, 93rd Cong., 1st sess. P.L.101-640, Nov.28,1990 101st Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662,, Nov.17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 100-676, Nov.17, 1988,. 99th Cong., 2d sess 9-72 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, FROM MARTIN COUNTY LINE TO LAKE WORTH INLET AND FROM SOUTH LAKE WORTH INLET TO BROWARD COUNTY LINE (See Section 49 of Text) Oct. 23, 1962 Federal participation in cost of local shore protection project and sand-transfer plant. WRDA Complete a review not later than 6 months after enactment of this Act Oct. 12, 1996 to determine if periodic beach nourishment is necessary for a period of 50 years beginning on the date of initiation of construction for Jupiter/Carlin, Ocean Ridge, and Boca Raton North Beach segments. PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, FROM LAKE WORTH INLET TO SOUTH LAKE WORTH INLET, FL (See Section 50 of Text) May 17, 1950 Federal participation in cost of local shore protection project on Palm Beach Island. Jul. 3, 1958 Federal participation in cost of local sand-transfer plant at Lake Worth Inlet and shore protection project. PINELLAS COUNTY, FL (See Section 51 of Text) Nov. 7, 1966 Federal participation in cost of shore protection project. Report of the Restoration of 5,000 feet of beach at Clearwater Beach Island, Board of Engineers 49,000 feet of beach at Sand Key, 92,000 feet of beach at for Rivers and Treasure Island, and construction of 600 feet of revetment at Harbors Apr. 23, Long Key. Also, renourishment of each island. 1985 SARASOTA COUNTY, FL (See Section 53 of Text) Report of the Shoreline protection along 12,600 feet of shoreline on central Chief of Engineers Longboat and 21,100 feet on Manasota Key in the vicinity of Feb.28, 1986 Venice, Florida and periodic nourishment of these areas Report of the Chief of Engineers Feb. 26, 1980 ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FL (See Section 52 of Text) Shoreline protection along 2.5 miles of problem area in the St. Augustine Beach and Coquina Gables area and periodic nourishment. H.Doc. 164, 87th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12,1996 104th Cong H.Doc. 772, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 342, 85th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 519, 89th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov.17, 1986. 99th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 99-662 Nov.17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662 Nov.17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess 9-73 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents FLOOD CONTRO PROJECTS WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 Jun. 30, 1948 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Do. Do. Do. Do. Oct. 27, 1965 Do. Aug. 13, 1968 IL CEDAR HAMMOCK (WARES CREEK), FL Project for flood control. P. ( 1 CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA, FL (See Section 56 of Text) First phase of comprehensive plan for flood control and other H purposes. 2 1 Modification and expansion of authorization to include entire comprehensive plan of improvement. Canals, levees, and water-control and drainage structures in the Nicodemus Slough area, Glades County. Flood protection on Boggy Creek, near Orlando. Flood protection in the Cutler Drain area, near Miami. Flood control and drainage works for South Dade County. Project Shingle Creek between Clear Lake and Lake Tohopekaliga for flood control and major drainage, including development of. Reedy Creek Swamp Improvement of easterly section of West Palm Beach Canal for flood control and major drainage. Primary works for flood control and major drainage in southwest Dade County. Primary works for flood control and major drainage in Hendry County. Gravity drainage in Martin County and distribution of available water supplies to portions of Martin and St. Lucie Counties. L. 104-303, )ct.12, 1996 .04th Cong .Doc. 643, 80th Cong., zd sess. (Contains atest published map) H.Doc. 643, 80th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 53, 86th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc.125, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 123, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc 138, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 139, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 146, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 20, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 102, 88th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 101, 90th Cong., 2d sess. 9-74 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Improvement of supply, distribution and conservation of water resources in Central and Southern Florida, including Lake Okeechobee agricultural area, Everglades National Park and other related areas. Approved Navigation improvements suitable for recreational craft. Dec. 17, 1970 under the provisions of Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 WRDA Deauthorized flood protection on Boggy Creek, near Orlando; Nov. 17, 1986 primary works for flood control and major drainage in southwest Dade County; and navigation improvements suitable for recreational craft. WRDA Extended modified water delivery schedules to Everglades National Nov. 17, 1988 Park. Everglades National Construct modifications to the Central and Southern Park Protection and Florida Project to improve water deliveries into the park and Expansion Act shall, to the extent practicable take steps to restore the natural of 1989 hydrological conditions within the park. WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 WRDA Oct.12, 1996 Oct. 23, 1962 WRDA Nov. 17, 1986 Modification of project for flood protection of West Palm Beach (C-51) to provide for the construction of an enlarged stormwater detention area, Storm Water Treatment Area 1 East. Modification of the project to implement the recommended plan of improvement for South Dade County (C-111), including acquisition by non-Federal interests of such portions of the Frog Pond and Rocky Glades areas as are needed for the project. FOUR RIVER BASINS, FL (See Section 59 of Text) Control of floods and improvement of drainage, and for water conservation through construction of necessary canals, levees, reservoirs, and control structures. Deauthorized Anclote River control structure and channel improvement. H.Doc. 369, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 394, 91st Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov.17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 100-676, Nov. 17,1988, P.L.101-229, Dec.13, 1989 101st Cong., 2d sess P.L. 104-303, Oct.12, 1996 104th Cong. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12,1996 104th Cong. H.Doc. 585, 87th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. 9-75 Do. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, PR (See Section 60 of Text) LAGO de CERRILLOS, PR Multiple purpose dam and lake for flood control, water supply and recreation. LAGO de PORTUGUES, PR Multiple purpose dam and lake for flood control, water supply and recreation. PONCE, PR Diversion and enlargement of existing channels through Ponce for flood control. RIO GRANDE DE ARECIBO, PR Project for flood control. RIO GRANDE DE LOIZA, PR Project for flood control. RIO PUERTO NUEVO, PR (See Section 62 of Text) Report of the Project for flood control. Chief of Engineers 25 Apr. 1986 RIO DE LA PLATA, PR (See Section 61 of Text) Report of the Project for flood control. Chief Engineers Jan. 1989 SAVAN GUT, ST. THOMAS, VI Sec. 205 of the Project for flood control. Increased maximum allotment to Flood Control $100,000. Act of 1948 WRDA Set maximum amount allotted under Section 205 of the Flood Nov. 28, 1990 Control Act of 1948 at $10,000,000. TURPENTINE RUN, ST. THOMAS, VI WRDA Project for flood control. Oct. 31, 1992 H.Doc. 422, 91st Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104th Cong. P.L. 102-580, Oct. 31, 1992 102nd Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 858, Jun. 30, 1948, 80th Cong, 2d sess. P.L.101-640, Nov. 28, 1990, 101st Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 102-580, Oct. 31, 1992 102nd Cong., 2d sess. 9-76 Dec. 31, 1970 WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 Report of the Chief of Engineers Mar. 5, 1992 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents RESTORATION PROJECTS WRDA Nov. 28, 1990 Report of the Chief of Engineers Mar. 17, 1992 WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 KISSIMMEE RIVER RESTORATION, FL (See Section 73 of Text) Conduct a feasibility study for the purpose of determining P.L. 101-640, modifications of the flood control project for central and southern Nov.28,1990 Florida, authorized by section 203 of Flood Control Act of 1948 101st Cong., 2d sess (62 Stat. 1176), which are necessary to provide a comprehensive plan for the environmental restoration. Project for the ecosystem restoration, to construct the headwaters P.L. 102-580,, revitalization project, and any modifications for the environmental Oct.31, 1992 restoration of the Kissimmee River Basin, ensuring that 102nd Cong., 2d sess. implementation of the project to restore the Kissimmee River will maintain the same level of flood protection as is provided by the current flood control project. EVERGLADES AND SOUTH FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION (See Section 74 of Text) Project consists of a comprehensive plan for the purpose of P.L. 104-303, restoring, preserving, and protecting the South Florida ecosystem. Oct. 12, 1996 The comprehensive plan shall provide for the protection of water 10 4 Cong., quality in, and the reduction of the loss of fresh water from, the Everglades. The comprehensive plan shall include such features as are necessary to provide for the water-related needs of the region, including flood control, the enhancement of water supplies, and other objectives served by the Central and Southern Florida project. 9-77 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 9-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 38 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1998 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Anclote River, FL Aquatic Plant Control, FL (R&H Acts of 1958 & 1962) Atlantic Gulf Ship Canal, FL Bayport, FL3 Cedar Island, Keaton Beach, FL Cedar Keys Harbor, FL Christiansted Harbor, St. Croix, VI 6 Clearwater Pass, FL21 Courtnay Channel, FL' Crystal River, FL' Everglades Harbor, FL' Fajardo Harbor, PR3 Guayanes Harbor, PR3 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway St. Marks to Tampa Bay, FL3 Hillsboro Inlet, FL24 Homosassa River, FL' Horseshoe Cove, FL Hudson River, FL3 Intracoastal Waterway, Miami to Key West, FL3 Key West Harbor, FL1 Kissimmee River, FL' Lake Crescent and Dunns Creek, FL" Largo Sound Channel, FL ' 12 Little Manatee River, FL3 " Manatee River, FL'5 New River, FL' Orange River, FL' Ozona, FL, channel and turning basin' Palm Beach, FL, side channel and basin3 Pass-A-Grille Pass, FL"'6 Pithlachascotee River, FL Rice Creek, FL' St. Petersburg Harbor, FL St. Thomas Harbor, VI 3 Steinhatchee River, FL' Suwannee River, FL' 5 Withlacoochee River, FL' 5 1974 1968 1939 1972 1977 1964 1980 1940 1941 1964 1945 1945 1974 1965 1937 1977 1974 1963 1972 1931 1931 1966 1949 1970 1956 1962 1963 1946 1966 1973 1957 1983 1949 1940 1977 1969 $ 267,427 1,640,997 2 5,099,153 58,524 168,569 5 303,317 46,349 7 22,846 25,000 221,509 8 38,850 3,999 9 347,521 9,889 243,079 1,548,89210 23,479 10,276 117,44313 11,90314 123,350 36,518 2,000 105,527 41,29717 400,000's 85,20819 255,60820 1,989 135,053 76,41822 614,91223 9-78 $ 919,411 54,969 76,023 58,595 1,568,252 26,779 152,208 51,034 26,454 576,169 28,046 534,623 112,954 9,035 51,149 194,516 31,296 24,918 15,089 60,686 261,401 18,814 1,746,09021 63,343 256,995 620,510 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 'Complete. 2 Excludes $1,640,997 contributed funds. 3 Inactive. 4 Includes $41,222 for reconnaissance and detailed project reports under Section 107 of the R&H Act of 1960. S Includes $82,500 expended under previous project. Excludes $1,473 contributed funds. 6 Project as modified by Chief of Engineers in report of June 30, 1961, is complete. Previously authorized depth of 25 feet in inactive status. ' Excludes $42,783 contributed funds. a Excludes $36,000 contributed funds. 9 In addition, $1,000 expended from contributed funds. 10 Includes $27,500 for new work under previous project.Excludes $35,371 contributed funds. " Deauthorized by Public Law 93-251, Section 12. 12 Authorized April 20, 1964 by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 R&H Act. 13 Includes $25,008 for detailed project report but excludes $86,716 expended from contributed funds. 14 Expended on restudy. 15 Inactive portion of project deauthorized by Public Law 93- 251,Section 12. " Authorized November 19, 1964 by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of R&H Act of 1960. 1 Excludes $41,297 contributed funds. '" Excludes $215,728 contributed funds. 19 Excludes $93,000 contributed funds. 20 Includes $32,689 under previous project. 21 Includes $20,532 under previous project. 22 Includes $10,154 expended under previous project. 23 Includes $30,000 expended under previous project. 24 Authorized by Section 301, R&H Act of 1965 and Section 107 of P.L. 101-640. 9-79 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 9-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS (See Section 54 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1998 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Cape Florida State Park, FL 1969 $34,862 $ El Tuque Beach, Ponce, PR 1985 1,396,730 Lee County, FL 1971 - Punta Salinas, PR 1984 855,511 Palm Beach County, FL, from Lake Worth Inlet to South Lake Worth Inlet 1970 195,140 6,257 San Juan, PR 1965 TABLE 9-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 64 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1998 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Arch Creek, Dade County, FL 1960 $66,485 ' Biscayne Bay, FL, Hurricane Protection 2 1966 Hillsborough Bay, FL 2 1969 Phillippi Creek Basin, FL 2 1966 'Excludes $11,734 cost of preauthorization studies. Project was authorized February 20, 1959, by Chief of Engineers under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act as modified by P.L. 685, 84th Congress. 2 Deauthorized by Public Law 93-251, Section 12. 9-80 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-H NAVIGATION PROJECTS ON WHICH RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS ONLY WERE CONDUCTED DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 37 of Text) Date Survey Cost Incurred Project Conducted During Period Anclote River, FL 4-98 218,091 Horseshoe Cove, FL 4-98 809,388 St. Petersburg Harbor, FL 8-98 6,771 Steinhatchee River, FL 5-98 4,990 Suwannee River, FL 5-98 11,145 Withlacoochee River, FL 6-98 9,725 Total $ 1,060,110 9-81 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 9-I CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL PROJECT DATA RELATIVE TO LOCK (See Section 5 of Text) Distance to nearest town 9.9 miles via 12-foot barge canal and Intracoastal Waterway Name of nearest town Cocoa, FL Distance from Intracoastal Waterway 6.5 miles Lock dimensions 909 wide; 6009 long' Lift Varies with tide Depth of Sills (mlw, ocean) 14 feet Character of foundation Piles in sand Year completed and opened to navigation 1965 Contract cost $2,979,670 '56x400 feet authorized. At request of NASA lock was constructed 90 feet wide with NASA bearing additional cost ($700,000). Length increased to 600 feet to be compatible TABLE 9-J Henry H. Buckman Lock and Dam Eureka Lock with increased width. Operation and maintenance of lock is a Federal responsibility. Bert Dosh Lock RN. Dunellon Lock Inglis Lock and Dam Nearest town (miles) Miles from Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Lock dimensions (ft.)' Normal lift (ft.) Depth over sills at normal pool levels: Upper (ft.) Character of foundation Kind of dam Type construction Percent complete Estimated contract cost Palatka, 11.2 90.4 84 x 600 20 14 Piles in sand Movable Earth3 100 Sparr, 15.8 111.4 84 x 600 20 17 Piles in sand Movable Earth3 100 Ocala, 8.9 127.7 84 x 600 0-152 16-312 Piles in sand None 0 Dunnellon, 2.5 156.5 84 x 600 12-272 16-312 Rock None 0 Inglis, 3.2 168.6 84 x 600 28 18 Rock Movable Earth3 100 $6,094,000 $7,975,000 $7,430,000 $9,500,000 $7,800,000 'Clear width and greatest available length. 2 Pool level varies with natural ground water profile from minimum elevation of 40 feet to maximum elevation of 55 feet. 3 With concrete spillway and movable gates. 9-82 CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL PROJECT LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 8 of Text) JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-L OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 24 of Text) Work Performed Cost Operations and Maintenance: Operations: Operations of locks, dams, and reservoirs $ 1,337,400 Operation of service utilities 644,500 Operation of power plants 800 Natural resource management 90,500 Recreation management 157,900 Water Control Management 400 Condition and operation studies and activities 0 Real estate management 69,600 Construction Management 171,400 Sub-Total 2,472,500 Maintenance: Lands and damages 4,800 Maintenance of locks 3,250,400 Maintenance of non-recreational buildings and grounds 264,700 Maintenance of recreational facilities 11,300 Maintenance of permanent operating equipment non-recreational 227,200 Channel and canal maintenance 341,600 Engineering and Design 9,800 Construction Management 420,800 Clearing accounts 0 Income Credits 600 Sub-Total 4,531,200 Total $ 7,003,700 9-83 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 9-M REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA CONTROL OPERATIONS (See Section 31 of Text) Locality Cost Channel and canal maintenance Operation of locks, dams, and reservoirs Operation of power plants Operation of service facilities Natural resource management Water control management Project operations management Maintenance of recreational facilities Maintenance of non-recreational permanent operating equipment Maintenance of non-recreational buildings and grounds Engineering and Design Construction Management $ 3,084,800 14,300 1,700 0 4,200 2,200 1,400 -800 0 0 32,200 -400 Total $ 3,139,600 9-84 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-0 CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED DURING FISCAL YEAR 1998 (See Section 56 of Text) Date transferred to Flood Control District Construction for Operation and Feature Period Maintenance Levees: Upper St. Johns L-79 Flowway; S-253 June 1995 - October 1996 July 1997 Upper St. Johns L-77 Flowway; L-77 Levee March 1996 - November 1996 July 1997 Upper St. Johns L-74N (Part) September 1995 July 1997 Upper St. Johns Site F - Malabar Rd. (Rec) September 1995 July 1997 TABLE 9-P CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT STATUS OF WORK UNDER CONTRACT AT END OF FISCAL YEAR 1998 (See Section 56 of Text) Construction Approx. % Feature Started Complete Levees: Hwy. 512 and Fellsmere Access March 1997 60 Upper St. Johns S-252 Flowway; S-252D April 1997 99 SJWMA Improvements July 1997 99 9-85 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 9-Q CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF HURRICANE GATES (See Section 56 of Text) Depth Character Over of Year Gate' Nearest Town Distance Sills Founda- Com- Actual No. Name (miles) (feet) tion pleted Cost 2. Clewiston, FL 0.5 10 Pile 1935 $309,748 3. Lake Harbor, FL 0.5 10 Rock 1935 316,938 4. Belle Glade, FL 4.0 10 Rock 1935 350,025 5. Canal Point, FL 0.0 10 Rock 1935 262,465 6. Okeechobee, FL 0.5 7 Pile 1936 373,273 'All are 50 feet wide with available length unlimited. They are constructed of concrete with steel sector Gate gates and have no lift. No. 6 has an auxiliary culvert spillway with automatic control. Moore Haven Lock serves as Hurricane Gate Structure 1. TABLE 9-R CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT LOCAL COOPERATION (See Section 56 of Text) Flood Control Act Work Authorized Cash Contribution' Jun. 30, 1948 First phase of comprehensive plan 15.0 Sep. 3, 1954 Second phase of comprehensive plan 20.0 Jul. 14, 1960 Nicodemus Slough area 31.5 Oct. 23, 1962 West Palm Beach Canal 66.3 Boggy Creek Basin 29.7 Shingle Creek Basin 25.9 South Dade County area 19.2 Reedy Creek Swamp 50.0 Oct. 27, 1965 Southwest Dade County 46.0 Hendry County area 19.5 Aug. 13, 1968 Martin County Flood Control Features 34.0 Irrigation Features 49.0 Backflow Features 20.0 P.L. 89-72 Recreation Features 50.0 Water Resources - St. Lucie 20.0 Recreation Features 50.0 Approved Dec. 17, 1970 Navigation improvements suitable for under provisions of recreational craft 50.0 Section 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act (Deauthorized Jan. 1, 1990 by P.L. 99-662) P.L. 99-662 Upper St. Johns River Basin - non-structural flood protection 25.0 Computed on total contract cost and supervision and administration except for Reedy Creek Swamp and Recreation Features which are computed on all costs, including engineering and design and land. 9-86 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-S CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 56 of Text) Work Performed Cost New Work: Channels and canals Levees Pumping plants Recreation Floodway control and diversion structures Feasibility Engineering and Design Construction Management Total cost $ 1,403,205 2,109,341 965,019 352,678 154,980 2,903,861 8,821,179 743,146 $ 19,520,367 Operations: Operation of locks, dams, reservoirs and performance system Operation of service facilities Operation of flood control structures Operation of power plants Natural resource management Operation and maintenance of recreation facilities, service and maintenance of traffic counters, master planning Condition and operation studies, periodic inspections, dam safety studies Roads, railroads, and bridges Water control management National preparedness program Real estate management Project operations management Sub-Total 1,587,000 526,900 676,100 -4,600 127,400 290,000 250,900 10,900 1,518,400 300 15,700 739,900 $ 5,738,900 Maintenance: Lands and damages Maintenance of dams Maintenance of locks Pumping plant maintenance Maintenance of levees and floodwalls Maintenance of recreational facilities Maintenance and purchase of non-recreational permanent operating equipment Bank stabilization Utilities, supplies, and maintenance of non-recreational buildings and grounds Channel and canal maintenance 7,000 101,800 -38,100 17,800 3,220,900 136,600 66,500 54,600 271,800 64,900 9-87 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 9-S CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 56 of Text) Work Performed Cost Engineering and Design Construction Management Clearing accounts Sub-Total Total 412,900 425,600 81,500 $ 4,814,500 $10,563,300 9-88 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-T FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLORIDA PROJECT CONDITION AT END OF FISCAL YEAR 1998 (See Section 59 of Text) Date transferred to Construction Southwest Florida Feature Period For Operation and Maintenance Bridges: B-194 Alteration of Facilities B-195 B-594 Alteration of Facilities B-196 SCL RR Bridge, B-196 Channels and Canals: C-135 C-135, Sec. 1A C-135, Sec. 1B C-135, Sec. 1C & 2 C-135, Sec. 3A C-135, Sec. 3B C-135, Sec. 4A C-136 C-231, Phase I C-231, Phase II C-331 C-531 C-534 C-135 Structures: Levees: S-160 S-161 S-162 S-353 Moss Bluff Lock and Spillway S-551 L-212, Sec. 1 L-212, Sec. 2 L-112 L-112 & Floodway S-155 S-163 S-159 Middle & Lower S-159 Upper Recreation: Morris Bridge & Flint Creek Sites Dead River Sites Jul 1968 - Mar 1970 May 1971 - Jan 1973 Jan 1973 - Jan 1974 Oct 1972 - Jan 1975 Dec 1972 - Jul 1975 May 1967 - Dec 1968 Jul 1966 - Aug 1967 May 1968 - Sep 1972 Jan 1971 - Dec 1973 Dec 1972 - Apr 1975 Feb 1975 - Aug 1977 Apr 1976 - Jan 1979 Aug 1975 - May 1977 Jul 1973 - Apr 1975 Jul 1973 - Jan 1974 Jul 1967 - Sep 1968 Apr 1966- Jan 1969 Jun 1979 - Jul 1971 Mar 1977 - Oct 1980 May 1967 - Dec 1968 Aug 1975 - May 1977 Apr 1975 - Jun 1977 Jul 1967 - Sep 1968 Apr 1967 - Mar 1969 Jul 1970 - Feb 1972 Jun 1968 - Jul 1970 Jul 1970 - Sep 1971 Mar 1977 - Oct 1980 May 1978 - Jul 1981 May 1978 - Jul 1981 May 1978 - Jul 1981 Apr 1979 - Aug 1981 Jun 1979 - Sep 1981 Dec 1982 - Aug 1984 Mar 1985- Jul 1986 Not transferred Do. Do. Do. Jul 1975 Dec 1968 Oct 1967 Not transferred Not transferred Oct 1977 Not transferred Not transferred Nov 1977 Dec 1975 Dec 1975 Sep 1968 Apr 1969 Nov 1971 Dec 1968 Nov 1977 Apr 1977 Nov 1968 Dec 1975 Not transferred Dec 1975 Dec 1975 Oct 1980 Jan 1983 Jan 1983 Jan 1983 Oct 1981 Jan 1985 Dec 1986 9-89 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TH ARMY ON CIVIL ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 9-U FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLORIDA PROJECT MOSS BLUFF LOCK (See Section 59 of Text) Nearest town 20 miles Name of nearest town Ocala, FL Distance above mouth of river 65.5 miles Lock dimensions 30 x 125 feet Normal lift 18.0 feet Elevation of normal pool surface 58 feet Depth of sills 12 feet Character of foundation Piles in sand Kind of dam None Type of construction Reinforced concrete Percent complete 100 Estimated cost (including dam and spillway) $1,990,138 TABLE 9-V FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 685, (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Section 65 of Text) Study Identification Period Costs Detailed Project Report: Cedar Creek, Jax, FL 111,132 Cedar Hammock, Bradenton, FL 935 Christopher Creek, FL 969 Cyril E. King Road, St. Thomas, VI 0 Estate Mon Bijou, St. Croix, VI 1,384 Goodbys Creek, Jax, FL 0 Government Center - N. Miami Bch, FL 0 Hwy 187, El Terraplen 0 Itchapackasassa Creek, Polk Co., FL 2,340 LaGrange Gut,Frederiksted, St. Croix, VI 7,201 Ortega River, FL 0 Ponce Regional, PR 35 Pottsburg Creek, Jax, FL 0 Quebrada Blasinia, PR 0 Rio Anton Ruiz-Runta, Santiago, PR 34,660 Rio Cibuco, Vega Baja, PR 17,511 Rio Coamo, Parcelas Valezquez, PR 0 Rio Cidra, La Playita, PR 0 Rio Culebrinas, Aguada, PR 126,862 Rio Culebras, Aguada, PR 8,979 Rio Descalabrada, Santa Isabel, PR 254 Rio El Ojo De Agua, PR 61,574 9-90 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-V FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 685, (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Section 65 of Text) Study Identification Period Costs Rio Fajardo, PR 239,240 Rio Guamani, Guayama, PR 183,810 Rio Jacaguas at Juana Dizz, PR 0 Rio Loco, Guanica, PR 40,228 Rio Manati, Barceloneta, PR 106,509 Rio Nigua, Arroyo, PR 0 Rio Patillas, PR 0 Rio Yauco, Yauco, PR 0 Sabana Grande, PR 0 Savan Gut, St. Thomas, VI 53,991 Soto Town, St. Thomas, VI 0 Spanish Pond, FL 190 Streams in Jacksonville, FL 35,162 Turpentine Run, St. Thomas, VI 6,615 W. Maule Lake - N. Miami Bch, FL 0 Wahneta Canal, Polk Co., FL 0 West Palm Beach, M-Canal, FL 0 Whitaker Bayou, FL 101,032 Sec 205 Coordination Account 7,725 9-91 MOBILE, AL., DISTRICT * This district comprises a small portion of southeastern Tennessee, western Georgia, western Florida, all of Alabama south of Tennessee River Basin, eastern Mississippi, and a small portion of southeastern Louisiana embraced in drainage basins tributary to the Gulf of Mexico, west of Aucilla River Basin, to and including the Pascagoula River Basin. The Pearl River IMPROVI Navigation Basin, Mississippi was included as part of the Mobile District until October 1, 1981, when responsibilities were transferred to Vicksburg District, Lower Mississippi Valley Division. A section of the Gulf Intracoastal Water from St. Marks, Florida, to Lake Borgne Light No. 29, Louisiana is also within Mobile District. Page 1. Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL & GA...............10-3 1A. Claiborne Lock and Dam, AL ...................... 10-3 lB. Coosa River, Montgomery to Gadsden, AL ..................................... 10-4 2. Apalachicola Bay, FL.................................... 10-4 3. Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, AL, FL & GA ....................... 10-4 3A. George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, AL & GA ..................................... 10-5 4. Aquatic Plant Control (R & H Act of 1965) .................................. 10-6 5. Bayou Coden, AL ..................................... 10-6 6. Bayou La Batre, AL ................................... 10-7 7. Biloxi Harbor, MS ..................................... 10-7 8. Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, AL ..................................... 10-8 8A. Jackson Port, Vicinity of Jackson, AL ....... 10-9 8B. Oliver Lock and Dam (Replacement), AL .................................... 10-9 9. Bon Secour River, AL .................................. 10-9 10. Carrabelle Harbor, FL .............................. 10-10 11. Dauphin Island, AL .................................. 10-10 12. Dog and Fowl Rivers, AL ........................ 10-11 13. East Pass Channel From Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, FL ..................... 10-11 14. Fly Creek, Fairhope, AL .......................... 10-11 15. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and Mexican Border .... 10-12 16. Gulfport Harbor, MS ............................... 10-12 17. Mobile Harbor, AL .................................. 10-12 18. Panama City Harbor, FL .......................... 10-13 19. Pascagoula Harbor, MS .............................. 10-14 20. Pensacola Harbor, FL ................................. 10-14 21. Perdido Pass Channel, AL ....................... 10-15 Page 22. Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL & MS .................................. 10-15 22A. Tennessee-Tombigbee Wildlife Mitigation, AL & MS ................. 10-16 23. Other Authorized Navigation Projects .................................. 10-17 24. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Project ..................................... 10-17 25. Other Authorized Flood Control Project ..................................... 10-17 26. Deauthorized Projects .............................. 10-17 27. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ............................... 10-17 28. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization.................................. 10-17 29. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ............................... 10-17 30. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ...... 10-17 Flood Control 31. Bayview Court, Bay St. Louis, MS .................................... 10-17 32. Black Warrior River Northport Levee, AL ............................... 10-17 33. Cedar Point Seawall Bay St. Louis, MS .................................... 10-17 34. Choctawhatchee and Pea Rivers, AL and FL ..................................... 10-18 34A. Choctawhatchee and Pea Rivers, Elba and Geneva Levees, AL ................... 10-18 35. Hancock County Seawall, Hancock County, MS ............................... 10-18 10-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Flood Control Page 36. Kings Creek Tupelo, MS ..................................... 10-19 37. Saint Louis Bay, Bay St. Louis, MS .................................... 10-19 38. Okatibbee Lake, MS ................................... 10-19 39. Sowashee Creek, Meridian, MS ........................................... 10-19 40. Threemile Creek, Mobile, AL ..................................... 10-20 41. Tombigbee River (East Fork), MS & AL ................................ 10-20 42. Tombigbee River and Tributaries, MS & AL .............................. 10-20 43. Upper Gordon Creek, Hattiesburg, MS ....................................... 10-21 44. Village Creek, Birmingham, AL ......................................... 10-21 45. Waveland Seawall W aveland, M S ............................................. 10-21 46. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization....................... 10-21 47. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............................. 10-22 48. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............................. 10-22 Multiple Purpose Power Projects 49. Allatoona Dam Coosa River Basin, GA ............................ 10-22 50. Buford Dam, Lake Sidney Lanier, GA ........................... 10-23 51. Carters Dam and Reservoir, GA .............. 10-23 52. Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, FL & GA ..................................... 10-23 53. Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, AL................ 10-24 54. Robert F Henry Lock and Dam, AL........... 10-24 55. Walter F. George Lock and Dam, AL & GA ......................................... 10-25 56. West Point Lake, Chattahoochee River Basin, AL & GA.......10-25 Miscellaneous 57. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ................................. 10-26 Page 58. Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies (FC&CE) ............................ 10-26 59. National Emergency Preparedness Program (NEPP) .................................... 10-26 60. Regulatory Functions Program ................... 10-26 61. Project Modification to Improve Environment .............................. 10-26 General Investigations 62. 63. 64. 61. Surveys ..................................................... 10-26 Collection and Study of Basic Data ......... 10-26 Preconstruction Engineering and Design .... 10-26 Rivers and Harbors Contributed Funds ................................... 10-27 Tables Table 10-A Table 10-B Table 10-C Table 10-D Table 10-E Table 10-G Table 10-H Table 10-J Table 10-K Table 10-L Table 10-M Table 10-N Table 10-0 Table 10-P Cost & Financial Statement ........... 10-28 Authorizing Legislation .................. 10-34 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ...................... 10-44 Other Authorized Beach Control Erosion Control Project .................. 10-44 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........................... 10-45 Deauthorized Projects .................. 10-46 Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .................. 10-46 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .................. 10-47 Reconnaisssance and Condition Surveys ..................................... 10-48 Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL & GA Development Proposed Under Existing Project ........................... 10-48 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, AL, GA, & FL, Locks and Dams and Multiple-Purpose Development Included in Existing Projects ....... 10-49 Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, AL ...................................... 10-50 Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL & MS .................................... 10-51 Completed Flood Insurance Studies And Flood Hazard Information Reports For FY 1988 Thru FY 1998 ............ 10-52 10-2 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT Navigation 1. ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, AL AND GA Location. Alabama River is formed 18 miles above Montgomery, Alabama, by the junctions of the Coosa and Tallapoosa Rivers. It then flows southwesterly through Alabama 318 miles and unites with the Tombigbee River about 45 miles north of Mobile, in southwestern Alabama, to form the Mobile River. (See Geological Survey maps for central and southwest Alabama.) The Coosa River is formed at Rome, Georgia, in northwest Georgia, by the junction of the Oostanaula and Etowah Rivers, which have their sources in southeastern Tennessee and northern Georgia. From Rome the Coosa River flows southwesterly through Georgia and Alabama 286 miles and unites with the Tallapoosa River near Montgomery, Alabama, at about the center of the State, to form the Alabama River. (See Geological Survey maps for northeast Alabama, southeast Tennessee, and northwest Georgia.) Previous project. Projects for Alabama River: for details see page 1837, Annual Report for 1915; page 725, Annual Report for 1938; and page 592, Annual Report for 1944. Projects for Coosa River: for details see page 1837, Annual Report for 1915; page 728, Annual Report for 1938; and page 594, Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorized project provides for full development of the Alabama-Coosa Rivers and tributaries for navigation, flood control, power, recreation, and other purposes, in accordance with plans under preparation by Chief of Engineers, subject to modifications thereof which may be advisable for increasing development of hydroelectric power. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Public Law 436, 83rd Congress, suspended authorization of the comprehensive plan, insofar as it provides for development of hydroelectric power for Coosa River, to permit non-Federal interests to develop the Coosa River by construction of a series of dams in accordance with conditions of a license issued pursuant to Federal Power Act and in accordance with certain other provisions and requirements of the aforementioned public law. The plan was further modified by the WRDA of 1986 to authorize planning, engineering and design for the project generally in accordance with the plans contained in Design Memorandum No. 1, General Design, dated May 1982. The present phase of improvement includes the construction of Robert F. Henry and Millers Ferry multiple-purpose improvements, Claiborne Lock and Dam, and supplemental channel work providing for a nine-foot deep navigation channel from the mouth of the Alabama River to Montgomery, Alabama, and construction of Carters Dam, a multiple-purpose improvement on Coosawattee River, Georgia. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation will be determined as formulation of plans for development of projects progress. No action in the matter of local cooperation has been initiated. Terminal facilities. On the east bank of the river a natural landing connects with city streets at Montgomery. There are also various natural landings along the river. Facilities and natural landings on Alabama River are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract maintenance dredging of the river system at a cost of $2,714,441. General charges for water control management, condition surveys, engineering and design, supervision and administration amounted to $1,814,308. Claiborne Lock and Dam charges were $75,948. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated on Carters Dam in April 1962, on Millers Ferry Lock and Dam in April 1963, Claiborne Lock and Dam in May 1965, and Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam in June 1966. Carters Dam was completed in FY 1980. The authorized nine-foot navigation channel to Montgomery, Alabama was opened to traffic in January 1972. Overall construction is complete in Millers Ferry Lock and Dam. Construction of Robert E Henry Lock and Dam is complete. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1998 is $112,971,999, including $3,245,400 for new work and $109,726,599 for maintenance. (See Table 10-L.) 1A. CLAIBORNE LOCK AND DAM, AL Location. The site is in Monroe County at mile 72.5 on the Alabama River, 15 miles northwest of Monroeville and 5.7 miles upstream from the U.S. Highway 84 bridge. Existing project. The existing project consists of a short earth dike on the right bank, a combination of a fixed-crest and gated spillway extending across the river channel and into the left bank, a navigation lock and mound on the left bank, and an earth dike extending across the left overbank to high ground. Normal upper pool is elevation 35 and the minimum pool will be elevation 32 to provide storage for reregulation of Millers Ferry powerplant releases. The 60-mile long reservoir has an area of 5,850 acres and a volume of 96,360 acre-feet. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa projects. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the lock and dam totaled $75,948. 10-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1965 and was completed in FY 1976 at a total cost of $27,997,450. Recreation attendance during FY 1998 totaled 142,100 visits. 1B. COOSA RIVER, MONTGOMERY TO GADSDEN, AL Location. The Coosa River is one of the two major tributaries forming the Alabama River approximately 18 miles northeast of Montgomery, Alabama. From its source at the juncture of the Etowah and Ooostanaula Rivers in northwest Georgia, it flows southwesterly about 286 miles to join with the Tallapoosa River in forming the Alabama River. Existing project. The improvement of the Alabama-Coosa River for navigation to Rome, Georgia was authorized by Congress in the River and Harbor Act of 1945. A report in House Document 320, transmitted to Congress on January 27, 1960, recommended that the navigation project for the Coosa River from Montgomery to Gadsden be accomplished after the waterway to Montgomery was assured. The plan of improvement identified in House Document 320 provided for a waterway 9 feet deep with widths of 200 feet to Montgomery, Alabama, and 150 feet to Rome, Georgia. The waterway to Montgomery has essentially been completed. The plan for the Coosa River segment of the waterway between Montgomery and Gadsden was further modified by the WRDA of 1986 to authorize planning, engineering and design for the project generally in accordance with the plans contained in Design Memorandum No. 1, General Design, dated May 1982. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1998 is $14,986,400 for new work. 2. APALACHICOLA BAY, FL Location. The project is on the coast of northwest Florida 160 miles east of Pensacola Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11401.) Previous project. For details, see page 1833, Annual Report for 1915, and page 689, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 10-foot depth in Apalachicola Bay, across St. George Island, to within 300 feet of the gulf shore, thence increasing uniformly in width to 200 feet at the shore and continuing with that width to the 10- foot depth in the Gulf of Mexico, with twin jetties extending from the dune line to the outer end of the channel; (b) an inner bar channel, 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide, in Apalachicola Bay; (c) a boat basin 200 feet by 880 feet and 9 feet deep at Apalachicola, Florida, with a connecting channel 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide through Scipio Creek to Apalachicola River; (d) a channel known as Link Channel, 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, in Apalachicola Bay; (e) a channel generally parallel to the shore at Eastpoint, Florida, 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long, and a connecting channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to water at the same depth in St. George Sound, with twin breakwaters on either side parallel to the shore and having a total length of 5,300 feet; (f) a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide through Bulkhead Shoals, connecting Apalachicola Bay with St. George Sound; and (g) a 6-foot by 100-foot channel about one mile long, generally parallel to the shore at Two Mile, Florida, with a 6-foot by 100-foot connecting channel to water of the same depth in Apalachicola Bay. Mean range of tide throughout this harbor is 1.6 feet. Extreme range, except during storms, is about three feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of pile-and-timber wharves which are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys cost $11,145; dredging $8,432; supervision and administration and other miscellaneous costs amounted to $17,906. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, authorized by the 1954 River and Harbor Act, was completed in 1959, including reimbursement to local interests for approved work, as authorized by the 1958 River and Harbor Act. Improvements at Two Mile except for modifications authorized in 1975 were completed in September 1964. Construction of the breakwater and channel improvements authorized in 1975 at Two Mile was completed in September 1977. Construction of breakwaters at Eastpoint authorized in 1983 was completed in March 1984. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1998 is $2,033,461 for new work and $5,352,083 for maintenance, a total of $7,385,544. 3. APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, AL, GA, AND FL Location. The Apalachicola River is formed at the southwest corner of the State of Georgia by the junction of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers and flows south 108 miles emptying into Apalachicola Bay. The Florida River enters the Apalachicola from the east at mile 45.4 and the River Styx also enters from the east at mile 36.7 and Chipola River enters 10-4 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT from the west at mile 28.2. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11401.) The Chattahoochee River, 418 miles long, rises in northeast Georgia and flows southwesterly to West Point, and thence southerly to join the Flint River at the southwest corner of Georgia, forming the Apalachicola River. (See Geological Survey maps for northwest Georgia.) The Flint River, 330 miles long, rises in west central Georgia, flows generally southeasterly to Albany, and thence southwest to the southwest corner of the State, where it joins the Chattahoochee River to form the Apalachicola River. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia. Previous project. For details see page 484 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. The authorized project provides for development of the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers for navigation, flood control, hydropower, and recreation. Navigation features of the existing project consist of a continuous 9-foot by 100-foot channel in the Apalachicola River from the intersection of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to the confluence of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, 104 miles, thence to Columbus, Georgia, on the Chattahoochee River, 164 miles, and to Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, 29 miles, and a 3-foot by 100-foot channel on the Flint River from Bainbridge to Albany, Georgia, 74 miles, thence a channel suitable for light draft vessels at moderate stage to Montezuma, Georgia, 79 miles to be accomplished by dredging, contract works, and construction of three locks and dams (Jim Woodruff, George W. Andrews, and Walter F. George) along the 9-foot depth channel, two multipurpose dams (West Point and Buford) on the Chattahoochee River. Three multipurpose dams (Lower Auchumpkee Creek, Lazer Creek, and Spewrell Bluff) on the Flint River were deauthorized in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The project also provides for minor improvements of certain streams tributary to the Apalachicola River, including a 9-foot by 100-foot side channel, approximately 2,000 feet long, from Apalachicola River to Apalachicola River Industrial Park at Blountstown, Fla. Plane side of reference is mean low water. Hydropower and flood control storage are provided at Sidney Lanier, Walter F. George, and West Point, and hydropower is provided at Jim Woodruff. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. The project was originally authorized in section 2 of the River and Harbor Act of 1945, was further modified by the WRDA of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Mean range of tide at the mouth of Apalachicola River is 1.6 feet. At the point where the river is formed the variation between low and high water is about 37 feet. On the Chattahoochee River, variation between average low and high water is about 20 feet, and extreme fluctuation is 65.3 feet at Eufaula. On the Flint River the extreme fluctuation of stage due to flood is 40 feet, while average variation between low and high water is about 21.5 feet. A Comprehensive Basin Study is currently being conducted on the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, Flint (ACF), and Alabama-Coosa-Tallapoosa (ACT) River Systems. Local cooperation. The six Florida Counties that originally served as local sponsors for the Florida portion of the waterway have all informed the District in writing that they no longer wish to serve as local sponsors. The State of Florida has also declined assumption of responsibilities of local sponsorship. At this time no items of local cooperation are being complied with. No local sponsors are required for the Alabama and Georgia portions of the waterway. Terminal facilities. About 200 feet of public docks, in addition to private wharves, are available at Apalachicola, Florida. There are numerous constructed and natural landings along the entire system for launching small craft. For details of other terminal facilities, which are considered adequate for existing commerce, see individual project descriptions. See also Table 10-M on locks and dams and multiple-purpose development included in existing project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging on the river system cost $4,493,153. Operation and maintenance of George W. Andrews Lock and Dam cost $627,128. All other costs for the project amounted to $930,081. Condition at end of fiscal year. Improvement of Apalachicola River channel by dredging to provide project dimensions throughout is complete. All major construction on Lake Sidney Lanier Dam, George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, Walter F. George Lock and Dam and West Point are complete. Channel rectification in Apalachicola River was completed December 1970. More detailed information concerning condition at the end of fiscal year for individual locks and dams and multiple-purpose developments comprising the system is presented under their respective project titles elsewhere in this report. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1998 is $4,452,162 for new work and $125,035,309 for maintenance, a total of $129,487,471. (See Tables 10-A and 10-M for fiscal year costs and summaries of overall project.) 3A. GEORGE W. ANDREWS LOCK AND DAM, AL AND GA Location. The project is on the Chattahoochee River about 46.5 miles above its mouth and about one mile below the town 10-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 of Columbia, Alabama, near the head of Jim Woodruff Reservoir. (See Geological Survey maps for southeast Alabama). The pool extends up the navigation channel about 28 miles upstream to Walter F. George Lock and Dam. Existing project. This single-purpose project provides for a concrete fixed-crest spillway 340 feet long extending into the right bank with a crest at elevation 102 feet national geodetic datum, a concrete gate spillway adjacent to the lock 280 feet long with crest at elevation 82 feet national geodetic datum, a single-lift lock with usable chamber dimensions of 82 feet by 450 feet, and a maximum lift of 25 feet. Depths are 13 feet over the lower sill and 19 over the upper sill at normal pool elevation. The underlying foundation is limestone. The project provides for maintenance and care. The House Committee on Public Works, by resolution adopted May 19, 1953, approved the plan as proposed by the Chief of Engineers for a high dam at Walter F. George site and a low dam at the Fort Benning site and a high dam at the upper Columbia site, construction of which was authorized by the 1946 River and Harbor Act as the initiation and partial accomplishment of the plan for full development of the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint River system. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must operate all movable span bridges, provide suitable public terminals, and hold the United States free from damages. These conditions are being complied with. Terminal facilities. At Columbia, Alabama, there is a public wharf with concrete deck for handling general cargo and a bulk petroleum terminal with an unloading dock. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of lock and dam cost $627,128. Maintenance cost included under overall Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint project. Recreation attendance for FY98 totaled 380,609. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the lock and dam began in March 1959 and was completed in November 1963 at a total cost of $13,038,427. (See also Table 10-M). 4. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (RIVER AND HARBOR ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable water, tributary streams, connecting channels and other allied waters in Mobile District. Existing project. The existing project provides for management and control of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, hydrilla, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable water, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economical control measures to be administered by the Chief of Engineers, under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies. Research and planning cost prior to construction shall be borne fully by the United States. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. Local interests shall agree to hold and save the United States free from claims that may occur from control operations and to participate to the extent of 50 percent of such operations. Requirements are being met in the state of Alabama by the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contractual services cost $3,817 and environmental studies amounted to $4,979. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total Federal cost under the exiting project as of September 30, 1998 is $921,611. Contributed funds for maintenance amount to $21,225. 5. BAYOU CODEN, AL Location. The project is located in a small tidal stream on the southern coast of Mobile County, Alabama, emptying into Mississippi Sound about 7.6 miles northwest of Cedar Point, the southern tip of western mainland shore of Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1945, page 843. Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel 8 feet deep by 60 feet wide extending from La Belle Avenue bridge south for about 3,000 feet through the bayou to Portersville Bay, thence 8 feet deep by 100 feet wide extending about 2.3 miles westward across Portersville Bay to connect with the Bayou La Batre channel, and a turning basin 8 feet deep by 60 feet wide by 100 feet long on the west side of the bayou channel about 500 feet south of the La Belle Avenue bridge. Mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Small privately-owned timber dock piles used in connection with fishing industry in this locality are adequate for existing commerce. A small ship building facility is located near the upper limits of the channel. The marina which will accommodate about 12 small recreational craft, and a slip with facilities for loading oyster shells are located 10-6 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT near the mouth of the bayou, and are maintained by the Alabama Department of Conservation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous cost amounted to $4,805. Condition at end of fiscal year. That portion of the project authorized prior to the 1969 modification was completed in 1956. Construction authorized in 1969 was initiated March 31, 1975 and completed March 26, 1976. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1998 is $330,701 for new work and $1,687,769 for maintenance, a total of $2,344,366. Contributed funds expended for new work amount to $100,000 and $130,340 for maintenance. 6. BAYOU LA BATRE, AL Location. Bayou La Batre is a tidal stream about 10 miles long, emptying into Mississippi Sound on the southern coast of Mobile County, AL., about 10 miles northwest of Cedar Point, the southern tip of the western mainland shore of Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1945, page 844. Existing project. The existing project provides for a 18- foot by 120-foot channel from Pascagoula Ship channel, connecting with the GIWW, along the GIWW alignment, connecting with an extension of the previous 12-foot channel alignment, through Mississippi Sound to the mouth of the bayou, a total distance of approximately 20 miles; then provides for a 12-foot by 100-foot channel to a point about 2,800 feet south of the highway bridge, thence a channel 12 feet deep by 75 feet wide to the bridge, with the channel widened at a point 0.6 mile below the bridge to provide a turning basin 12 feet deep and about 2.6 acres in area. Authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1990, the plan of improvement is to deepen channel to 18-foot by 100-foot from the mouth through the turning basin, a distance of about 1.8 miles; deepen channel from turning basin to 0.29 miles above highway 188 bridge to 14-feet by 75-feet, a distance of about 0.89 miles; extend a 14-foot by 50-foot channel from turning basin into Snake Bayou for about 730 feet and a 12-foot by 50-foot channel within Snake Bayou about 790 feet. Mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.75 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Wooden wharves have been provided at seafood processing plants and public launching ramps are available. Several boatways for construction of small seagoing vessels are also available. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $54,123. Maintenance: Condition Surveys and miscellaneous cost $51,832. Dredging cost $319,588. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was modified December 30, 1966 under the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers to include a turning basin. The project was completed in March 1967. The contract for deepening the Sound Channel was completed in May 1994. The construction of the Bayou Channel was completed in September 1997. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1998 is $5,777,691 for new work and $6,211,332 for maintenance, a total of $11,989,023. Contributed funds from local interests for new work amount to $697,500. 7. BILOXI HARBOR, MS Location. The project is located on Mississippi Sound in southeastern Mississippi, 32 miles by water west of Pascagoula Harbor, Mississippi, and 14 miles east of Gulfport Harbor, Mississippi (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 584, Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The existing project provides for a continuous channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 23 miles long from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Mississippi Sound east of Deer Island, Biloxi Bay, Back Bay, Cranes Neck, and a land cut to Gulfport lake, including a 500-foot by 2,600- foot basin in the lake, thence a 12-foot deep by 100-foot wide channel for about two miles westward from the west end of the lake, terminating in a 300-foot by 500-foot basin; a 12- foot by 100-foot channel from the main channel in Big Lake to and up Bayou Bernard to the Air Force oil terminal at about mile 2.6; a 12-foot by 150-foot spur channel from the main channel in Biloxi Bay for about one mile, terminating in a 400-foot by 600-foot turning basin opposite Ott Bayou; continuation of maintenance of the 12-by 150-foot lateral channel westward about 2.2 miles to Biloxi's south waterfront; a 10-foot by 150-foot channel from Mississippi Sound, passing west of Deer Island to a point where it connects to the 12-foot by 150-foot lateral channel at Biloxi's south waterfront. Construction for the modifications lateral channel authorized by River and Harbor Act of November 7, 1966 was commenced in FY 1974 and completed in February 1975. Further modifications to the project were authorized by the Chief of Engineers on March 28, 1979, which provided for a channel 10 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 300 feet long extending northward from the Biloxi Lateral Channel, and into a 10-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 rectangular basin, approximately 300 by 370 feet, for use by commercial small craft, and an East Harrison County Canal project which provides for a 12-foot project depth, 130-feet wide and about 2,100 feet long, and a 300 by 300 foot turning basin also to a 12-foot project depth. This work was completed in April 1980. Cost of modification as authorized by the 1966 River and Harbor Act was $664,390. That portion of the project providing for an entrance channel 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide, and about 1,800 feet long into Old Fort Bayou, as authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act, is inactive. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion was $6,000. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A number of wooden piling-and-timber piers for small craft and fishing boats, a bulk gasoline terminal, several boat ways, and concrete products plant are available. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging cost $408,522 and condition surveys cost $18,745. Water quality studies, and miscellaneous costs totaled $136,442. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, prior to the modification authorized in 1966, was commenced in 1931 and completed in 1962. The 1966 modification was completed in FY 1975. The 1979 modification was completed in 1980. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1998 is $1,431,919 for new work and $14,853,630 for maintenance, a total of $16,285,549. Contributed funds for new work amount to $102,600. Contributed funds for maintenance amount to $238,640. 8. BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL Location. Black Warrior River rises in northern Alabama above Birmingham and flows generally southwesterly to unite with the Tombigbee River at Demopolis, Alabama. Thence the Tombigbee flows south, uniting with the Alabama River to form the Mobile River 45 miles above the head of Mobile Bay. Distance by water from Mobile to vicinity of Birmingham is about 430 miles. Previous project. For details see page 732, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide from the mouth of the Tombigbee River, 45 miles above Mobile, to the vicinity of Birmingham, via the Tombigbee and Black Warrior Rivers, to mile 430.4 on Sipsey Fork, mile 429.6 on Mulberry Fork and mile 407.8 on Locust Fork, and for maintenance by snagging of Mobile River above the mouth of Chickasaw Creek, a total waterway distance of about 408 miles. The total lift of 255 feet is accomplished by six locks and dams. The original construction program, consisting of 17 dams and 18 lifts, was completed in 1915. Replacement of the original structures with new 110- by 600-foot locks and dams, under the modernization program is as follows: William Bacon Oliver replaced locks 10, 11, and 12; Armistead I. Selden replaced locks 8 and 9; Demopolis replaced locks 4, 5, 6, and 7; Coffeeville (Jackson) replaced locks 1, 2, and 3; and Holt replaced locks 13, 14, 15, and 16. Thus, 16 of the original locks have been replaced by five new locks. Bankhead Lock and Dam (Lock 17) rehabilitation to replace the original double lift lock with a single lift lock was completed in 1980. The Coffeeville Lock and Dam wildlife refuge, authorized in 1960, includes 4,250 acres within the reservoir area and along its boundaries. A replacement lock for the old Oliver Lock located 2,300 feet downstream has been completed. The replacement lock has dimensions of 110 feet by 600 feet. A fixed crest spillway extends 800 feet across the river. Minimum provision was provided to allow construction of a hydropower plant. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Tidal influence extends upstream from Mobile 101.6 miles to Coffeeville Lock and Dam, where tidal effect is apparent only at low stages of the river. At Mobile the mean and extreme tidal ranges are 1.5 and 3.6 feet, respectively. These are at times slightly increased by the effect of winds. The greatest fluctuation of river stages is at Demopolis, Ala., the maximum being 59.7 feet. Maximum fluctuations at other points are 40 feet at old lock 1, which is 100.6 miles from Mobile; 57.8 feet at Tuscaloosa, 346.1 miles from Mobile; 13 feet at Birmingport, 404.9 miles from Mobile; and 27 feet at Cordova, 424.3 miles from Mobile. Ordinary fluctuations at these points are at old lock 1,20 feet; at Demopolis, 35 feet; at Tuscaloosa, 40 feet; at Birmingport, four feet; and at Cordova, seven feet. Works of improvement reduced the amount of fluctuations at different points by three to 10 feet. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Docks, storage facilities, and handling equipment have been provided as required at most loading and unloading points along the waterway. These include facilities for handling petroleum and petroleum products, coal, ores, sand and gravel, pulpwood, manufacturers, and various other commodities. While most terminal facilities are privately owned, many are available for use by the general public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Table 10-N for existing locks and dams.) 10-8 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging of the river system cost $6,857,457. Condition surveys cost $766,275. Engineering and design cost supervision, administration and other general charges for the overall river project totaled $12,979,327. Recreation attendance FY 1998 totaled 4,048,700 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work on the project, commenced in 1887, was essentially completed in 1915. Since then three of the original locks and dams (10, 11 and 12) were replaced by William Bacon Oliver (Tuscaloosa) Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1939; four original lock and dams (4, 5, 6 and 7) were replaced by Demopolis Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1954; two original locks and dams (8 and 9) were replaced by Warrior Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in October 1957; three original locks and dams (1,2 and 3) were replaced by Coffeeville Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1960; and four original locks and dams (13, 14, 15 and 16) were replaced by Holt Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in June 1966. Rehabilitation of the spillway at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam commenced in 1966, and physically completed February 6, 1970. Replacement of the double lift lock with a single lift lock at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam commenced in April 1970 and was completed in 1980. The power plant at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam and Holt Lock and Dam, was built and is operated by the Alabama Power Co. Construction of the new Oliver Lock and Dam is completed with the new lock open to traffic as of July 1991. Project construction began in November 1986 and is scheduled for completion in January 1996. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1998 is $88,461,935 for new work and $377,117,739 for maintenance, and $52,292,880 and major rehabilitation, a total of $517,872,554. 8A. JACKSON PORT, JACKSON, AL Location. The project is located on the Tombigbee River in Clarke County in southwest Alabama in the city of Jackson, Alabama, approximately 90 miles north of Mobile, Alabama. Existing project. None. The authorized Port would be located on the Black Warrior-Tombigbee River System, which is a federally authorized 9 by 300 feet navigation project connecting Birmingham, Alabama with the Port of Mobile. In conjunction with the realignment project on the existing navigation project, the district has been directed to construct a spur canal to serve as a port at Jackson. Local cooperation. Local Cooperation Agreement requirements have not been determined. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design $514,582. Condition at end of fiscal year. The Design Memorandum and Final Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) are scheduled for completion in February 1999. Design (P&S) is scheduled for completion in February 1999. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1998 is $1,909,089. 8B. OLIVER LOCK AND DAM (REPLACEMENT), AL Location. The project is located at mile 337.7 on the Black Warrior-Tombigbee River System at Tuscaloosa, Alabama. Existing project. The existing navigation facilities on the Black Warrior and Tombigbee include six (6) locks having a total lift of 255 feet. Each of the locks have chamber dimensions of 110 by 600 feet. Original work on the waterway was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1884. The 17 original locks have been replaced by the existing six (6) locks. Previously, Oliver Lock was the only lock in the system with chamber dimensions of 95 by 460 feet. Authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the plan of improvement was to replace Oliver Lock and Dam at a new location 2,300 feet downstream. The replacement lock with chamber dimensions by 110 by 600 feet was opened to traffic in July 1991. The fixed crest spillway, extends 800 feet across the river. Minimum provisions are being provided to allow construction of a hydropower plant. Land Acquisition is complete. Construction was initiated in November 1986 with the award of the Alabama Power Company relocation contract. The first stage cofferdam and river diversion contract was awarded in February 1987 and the lock and dam construction contract was awarded in March 1988. For other information see description of Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers project. Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement is not required. One-half of the total cost of construction of the navigation lock and dam will be paid by amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design $1,206. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete at an estimated cost of $125,000,000. Total Federal (Corps of Engineers) cost under existing project to September 30, 1998 is $61,386,051 for new work. Contributed funds (Inland Waterways Trust) expended total $62,451,012. 9. BON SECOUR RIVER, AL Location. Rises 2 miles south of Foley, Ala., and flows southerly about 8 miles, emptying into Bon Secour Bay, an arm of Mobile Bay in southwest Alabama. 10-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Existing project. A 10- by 80-foot channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Bon Secour Bay to mouth of Bon Secour River and extending up river to vicinity of Swifts Landing, thence 6 by 80 feet up river to a point about 600 feet above Oak Landing with two turning and maneuvering areas 150 feet wide and 1,100 to 1,200 feet long opposite Swifts Landing and ice loading dock. Also a 10 by 80 foot South Fork channel from the intersection with the Bon Secour channel, 1.14 miles to a 150 x 150 foot turning basin. Plane of reference is mean low water. Overall length of improvement is about 4.7 miles. Mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Existing project was authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 16, 1963, under authority in Section 107, River and Harbor Act of 1960. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A number of pile-and-timber marginal wharves used by the seafood industry and a marine ways are located along the existing project. These, together with numerous privately owned piers, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous cost $13,614. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was commenced in July and completed in October 1964. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1998 is $150,615 for new work and $1,493,707 for maintenance, a total of $1,644,322. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $9,700. 10. CARRABELLE HARBOR, FLORIDA Location. Carrabelle Bar and Harbor is located 50 miles south, southeast of Tallahassee, Florida, on St. George Sound and the Gulf of Mexico. Existing Project. The existing project provides for a 27- by 200-foot channel from the Gulf of Mexico for 3 miles to a point west of Dog Island, thence a 25- by 150-foot channel for 5 miles through St. George Sound and Carrabelle River to a turning basin 500 feet square and 25 feet deep at the town of Carrabelle, a 10- by 100-foot channel from turning basin for 0.6 mile to U.S. 98 bridge, thence a 10- by 80-foot channel for 3 miles to the confluence of New and Crooked Rivers. Plane of reference is mean low water. Channels above the turning basin were authorized May 17, 1965 by Chief of Engineers under authority in Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of July 14, 1960. Other features of existing project were authorized by River and Harbor Act of September 3, 1954. The mean tidal range is 2.2 feet, and extreme is 3.0 feet, exclusive of storms. Local Cooperation. Items of local cooperation have been furnished by the Board of County Commissioners, Franklin County, Florida. Terminal Facilities. Existing terminal facilities are adequate for the current needs of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contract maintenance dredging of the project above the Highway 98 Bridge was performed at a cost of $516,490. Condition surveys were performed at a cost of $26,514, and miscellaneous cost of $27,691. Condition at end of fiscal year. All new work for this project was completed in 1965. Total Federal cost of the existing project to September 30, 1998 is $481,627 for new work and $1,032,044 for maintenance, a total of $1,513,671. 11. DAUPHIN ISLAND BAY, AL Location. The project is located between Dauphin and Little Dauphin Island on the west side of the entrance to Mobile Bay, about 30 miles south of Mobile, Alabama and 55 miles west of Pensacola, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A channel 7 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay to an anchorage basin of the same depth, and about 7 acres in area, in the marsh just north of Fort Gaines on Dauphin Island; a channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide from the anchorage basin to Dauphin Island Bay; and a jetty and revetment to protect the entrance channel; and (b) an anchorage basin 7 feet deep and 500 feet square at Dauphin Island Village, with an entrance channel of like depth, 100 feet wide and about 8,300 feet long, extending to the 7-foot hydrographic contour in Mississippi Sound. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet, and extreme, except during storms is about 4 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Several privately-owned wharves for handling seafood, a public dock and mooring slip, and a pier for recreational craft are located on the village basin. A marina, public launching ramp, and a number of private piers are located on the bay. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous cost $4,335. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in July 1959. Total Federal cost under existing project as of 10-10 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT September 30, 1998 is $292,864 for new work and $2,784,932 for maintenance, a total of $3,077,796. 12. DOG AND FOWL RIVERS, AL Location. Dog and Fowl Rivers are primarily tidal streams emptying into the west side of Mobile Bay, 8.5 and 17 miles, respectively, south of central Mobile (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Existing project. The Dog River project provides for a 7 by 100-foot channel with a total length of 4.5 miles to provide access to the Mobile ship channel. The Fowl River project provides for a channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Mobile Bay into and up Fowl River to deep water about 6,700 feet above its mouth. Total length of the channel is about 2.6 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is about 1.5 feet in Dog River. Extreme range during storms is about 3.6 feet. This segment of the project was completed in November 1973. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities consist of a boatyard for fabricating steel vessel hulls, nine marinas, four marine ways, a yacht basin on Dog River; two marinas on Fowl River, and numerous timber piers and docks on both rivers. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Environmental studies and compliance cost $44,883, and miscellaneous cost $3,203. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing Fowl River portion of the project was commenced in August 1973 and completed in November 1973. Work on the Dog River channel realignment was initiated and completed during FY 1986. Total Federal cost on the existing project as of September 30, 1998 is $4,150,602; $391,354 for new work and $3,759,248 for maintenance. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $195,626. 13. EAST PASS CHANNEL FROM GULF OF MEXICO INTO CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY, FL Location. East Pass Channel is located in the entrance from the Gulf into Choctawhatchee Bay at eastern end of Santa Rosa Island, 48 miles east of the entrance into Pensacola Bay and 49 miles west of the new entrance to St. Andrews Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11388.) Previous project. For details see page 672 of Annual Report for 1937. Existing project. The existing project provides for a 12- foot by 180-foot channel from the Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, and a 6-foot by 10-foot channel from East Pass Channel into Old Pass Lagoon. The project consists also of two converging jetties spaced 1,000 feet apart at the seaward end. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet; extreme range, except during storms, is 2.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Responsibilities of local cooperation have been complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Small privately-owned pile-and-timber piers used in connection with the fishing industry in this locality are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Channel dredging cost $5,351; supervision and administration and miscellaneous costs totaled $4,352. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the 1965 modification was commenced October 1967 and completed January 1969. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1998 is $916,715 for new work and $13,066,899 for maintenance, a total of $13,983,614. Contributed funds for new work from local interests amount to $398,000. 14. FLY CREEK, AL Location. Fly Creek (Volanta Bayou) is a small stream about 4.5 miles long rising in Baldwin County, Alabama, 3 miles east of town of Fairhope, from whence it flows northerly, thence westerly and southerly, to form an estuary on eastern shore of Mobile Bay just north of Fairhope and about 13 miles southeast of Mobile, Alabama. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 11376.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long from 6-foot depth in Mobile Bay to a turning basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 350 feet long, in Fly Creek. Mean tidal range in vicinity of project is about 1.3 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Existing project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of May 17, 1950, (H. Doc. 194, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.). The project document contains the latest published map. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Fairhope Yacht Club has facilities for small recreational craft on the south bank near mouth of creek, consisting of a pile-and-timber service wharves, several sheet metal boat sheds, boat slips, and other mooring facilities. There is also a commercial marina on north bank of creek. Operation and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Channel dredging cost $21,538; supervision and administration and miscellaneous cost $10,060. 10-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was commenced in August and completed in October, 1957. Total project costs as of September 30, 1998 amounted to $882,042 of which $29,000 was for new work and $853,042 for maintenance. 15. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL AND MEXICAN BORDER (MOBILE DISTRICT) Location. The project extends westward from Apalachee Bay, Florida, along the Gulf coast to the Rigolets, Louisiana, via a series of coastal lakes, bays, sounds, and land custs. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Previous project. For details see page 906, Annual Report for 1930. Existing project. The existing project provides for a waterway 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide at mean low water from Apalachee Bay, Florida, to Mobile Bay, Alabama, and 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay, Alabama to Rigolets, Louisiana (Lake Borgne Light No. 29), and for a tributary channel (Gulf County Canal), 12 feet deep, 125 feet wide and about six miles long connecting Intracoastal Waterway at White City, Florida, with St. Joseph Bay. The waterway between the 12-foot depth contours in Apalachee Bay and Lake Borgne Light No. 29 at the Rigolets is 379 miles long. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None. Terminal facilities. Facilities are available for public use at Carrabelle, Apalachicola, Panama City, and Pensacola, Florida; Mobile and Bayou La Batre, Alabama; and Pascagoula, Biloxi, Gulfport, Pass Christian, and Bay St. Louis, Mississippi. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging navigation channel maintenance cost $5,025,789. Condition surveys, water quality studies, supervision and administration totaled $784,285. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is completed except for the portion between Apalachicola Bay and St. Marks, Florida, which has been deauthorized. Modification of the Gulf County Canal to provide a 12-foot by 125-foot channel was commenced July 1968 and completed June 1969. Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1998 is $93,456,832, of which $6,480,299 was for new work and $86,976,533 for maintenance. 16. GULFPORT HARBOR, MS Location. The project is located on Mississippi Sound in southeastern Mississippi, about 35 miles west of Pascagoula, Mississippi, and 60 miles east of New Orleans. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 747. Annual Report for 1938, and page 995, Annual Report for 1948. Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A channel 32 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and about eight miles long across Ship Island Bar, a channel 30 feet deep, 220 feet wide, and about 11 miles long through Mississippi Sound, and an anchorage basin at Gulfport 30 feet deep, 1,320 feet wide, and 2,640 feet long; and (b) maintenance of the existing commercial smallboat harbor about 26 acres in area, and a straight-approach channel, 100 feet wide and about 4,300 feet long, from deep water in Mississippi Sound to a smallboat basin, all at a depth of 8 feet. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.75 feet, and extreme range, except during storms, is about 3.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is authorized in the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) 1986, and further amended by WRDA 1988 to modify the existing ship channel to 36 by 300 feet in Mississippi Sound, and 38 by 400 feet across the bar, with changes in the channel alignment and the turning basin for safe and unrestricted navigation. The FY 91 construction appropriation provided for constructing an increment of the authorized project and provide a 36 by 220 feet channel in Mississippi Sound and 38 by 300 feet across the bar. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Conditions of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Existing modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $30,034. Maintenance: Contract dredging at a cost of $552,385. Condition surveys, supervision and administration and miscellaneous costs amounted to $191,674. Condition at end of fiscal year. The main harbor was commenced 1932 and completed April 1950. Maintenance for small boat harbor and approach channel, constructed by local interests in 1950, was authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act. Awarded thin-layer monitoring contract in June 1991 under the authority of WRDA 1986 and 1988. The channel contract was awarded in April 1992, thin-layer monitoring program is continuing. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1998 is $24,172,374 for new work and $53,450,553 for maintenance, a total of $77,622,927. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $8,976,028. 17. MOBILE HARBOR, AL Location. The project is located along the lower 5 miles of Mobile River, and channel extends thru Mobile Bay and into 10-12 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT Gulf of Mexico, in southwestern Alabama, 91 miles by water west of Pensacola Harbor, Florida, 90 miles east of Gulfport Harbor, Mississippi, and 144 miles by water northeast of mouth of Mississippi River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Previous project. For details see page 503, Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A 47-foot by 600-foot channel about 1.5 miles long across Mobile Bar; (b) a 45-foot by 400-foot channel in Mobile Bay to mouth of Mobile River; (c) a 40-foot channel in Mobile River to highway bridge, varying from 500 to 775 feet wide; (d) a 25- foot channel from highway bridge to and up Chickasaw Creek to a point 400 feet south of mouth of Shell Bayou, widths being 500 feet in Mobile River and 250 feet in Chickasaw Creek; (e) a turning basin 40 feet deep, 2,500 feet long, and 800 to 1,000 feet wide, opposite Alabama State Docks; (f) a turning basin 40 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and 1,600 feet long opposite Magazine Point; (g) a 27-foot by 150-foot channel from Mobile Bay Channel along Arlington pier to a turning basin 800 feet long and 600 feet wide opposite Brookley Complex ocean terminal, and continuing thence a turning basin 250 feet wide and 800 feet long in Garrows Bend, thence a 22-foot by 150-foot channel to the causeway linking McDuffie Island to the mainland; (h) a channel serving the Theodore Industrial Park 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the main ship channel in Mobile Bay and extending northwesterly for about 5.3 miles to the shore of Mobile Bay, including an anchorage basin near the shoreline, thence a land cut 40 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 1.9 miles long to and including a 42 acre trapezoid turning basin 40 feet deep, and a barge channel 12-by 100-feet, extending 6,500 feet and terminating in a 300- by 300-foot turning basin; and (i) maintenance of Three Mile Creek by snagging, from its intersection with Industrial Canal to Mobile River. The project provides also for an anchorage area 32 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 200 feet long opposite site formerly occupied by the U.S. Quarantine Station at McDuffie (Sand) Island. Prior to widening the Mobile Bay Channel as authorized in 1954, the Quarantine Station anchorage area was maintained to a project width of 200 feet. Construction by local interests of a solid-fill causeway across Garrows Bend Channel between McDuffie Island and the mainland is also provided for under existing project. Total length of the bay and river channel is about 41.7 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range at the lower end of the improvement is 1.2 feet and at the upper end 1.5 feet. Extreme tidal range is 3.4 feet at the lower end and 3.6 feet at the upper end. Further authorization provides for future development to deepen and widen entrance channel over the bar to 57 feet by 700 feet about 7.4 miles long, deepen and widen bay channel to 55 feet by 550 feet about 27.0 miles long, deepen and widen an additional 3.6 miles of bay channel to 55 feet by 650 feet and provide 55 foot deep anchorage area and turning basin in vicinity of Little Sand Island. All dredged material will be placed in an approved disposal area in the Gulf of Mexico. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement was signed by the local sponsor to construct the project for the first increment of work. Terminal facilities. Modem rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 18, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and Design $46,118. Maintenance: Contract dredging at a cost of $18,683,255. Condition surveys cost $182,757. Water quality studies, engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $1,211,178. Condition at end of fiscal year. Phase I of the project modification was completed in June 1990. Current estimated Federal cost is $218,548,000, and non-Federal cost is $178,452,000. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1998 is $96,363,300 for new work and $257,287,953 for maintenance, a total of $353,651,253. Contributed funds expended amounted to $18,663,642 for new work. 18. PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL Location. The project is located on the northwest coast of Florida, 102 miles east of entrance to Pensacola Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11389.) Previous project. For details see page 710, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel about 3.5 miles long, extending from deep water in St. Andrew bay through barrier peninsula, known as Lands End, to the Gulf of Mexico, 300 feet wide and 32 feet deep in the bay through Lands End; and 450 feet wide and 34 feet deep in the gulf, protected by east, west jetties, extending 2,075 feet and 2,896 feet respectively; a channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep in Grand Lagoon to a point about 2,400 feet east of State Highway 392 Bridge, with branches to serve terminal facilities; and the maintenance of a channel in Watson Bayou, an arm of St. Andrew Bay, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in bay to highway bridge. Authorized modifications includes branch channels 38 feet deep and 300 feet wide, leading from the inner end of the main 10-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 entrance channel westward to the Port Authority terminal at Dyers Point and eastward to the Bay Harbor terminal, about 3.4 and 3.6 miles in length, respectively; turning and maneuvering areas comprising about 55 acres opposite Dyers Point, and 42 acres opposite Bay Harbor, both at a depth of 38 feet; and an anchoring and loading basin for LASH type intermodal carriers, 40 feet deep and containing about 177 acres in St. Andrew Bay near the inner end of the main entrance channel. Mean tidal range is about normally 1.3 feet and 3.0 feet extreme. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Available terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous costs totaled $-11,439. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project (prior to modifications) was completed in November 1949. Repairs to jetties were commenced in June 1961 and completed October 1968. Modifications to the project at Grand Lagoon were completed in January 1972. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1998 is $1,638,045 for new work and $13,011,839 for maintenance, a total of $14,649,884. Contributed funds expended for new work amount to $80,000. 19. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS Location. The project is located along lower 6.8 miles of Pascagoula River, the lower six miles of Dog River, and in Bayou Casotte (about four miles east of the mouth of Pascagoula River), and through Mississippi Sound into the Gulf of Mexico, in southeastern Mississippi, about 38 miles west of Mobile, Alabama, and about 100 miles east of New Orleans, Louisiana. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 741, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for (a) An entrance channel 40 feet deep and 350 feet wide from the Gulf of Mexico through Horn Island Pass, including an impounding area for littoral drift, 40 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 1,500 feet long adjacent to the channel at the west end of Petit Bois Island; (b) a channel 38 feet deep and 350 feet wide in Mississippi Sound and Pascagoula River to the railroad bridge at Pascagoula, including a turning basin 2,000 feet long and 950 feet wide (including channel area) on the west side of the river below the railroad bridge; (c) a channel 38 feet deep and 225 feet wide from the ship channel in Mississippi Sound to the mouth of Bayou Casotte, thence 38 feet deep and 300 feet wide for about one mile to a turning basin 38 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and 1,750 feet long; (d) a 22-foot deep by 150-foot wide channel up Pascagoula River from the railroad bridge to the mouth of Escatawpa (or Dog) River, then up Escatawpa River to Highway 613 (formerly 63) bridge; (e) a 12-foot by 125-foot channel from the highway bridge; via Robertson and Bounds Lakes, to mile 6 on Escatawpa River; and (f) a 12- foot by 80-foot channel extending from deep water in the Pascagoula River (about one-half mile north of the railroad bridge) to a turning basin in Krebs Lake a distance of about 1,500 feet, then along the south bank of the lake a channel 10- foot by 60-foot and terminating at a second turning basin, a distance of 2,700 feet from the first. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme range is 3.75 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Further authorization provides for deepening and widening gulf entrance channel to 44 by 550 feet; widen Horn Island channel to 600 feet, relocating that channel about 500 feet westwardly; deepen Mississippi Sound portion to 42 feet; widen and deepen Bayou Casotte to 42 by 350 feet and construct turning basin. Disposal of all new work material in Gulf of Mexico. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and Design cost $136,363. Maintenance: Contract dredging at a cost of $2,799,814. Condition surveys cost $49,070. Water quality studies, supervision and administration, and miscellaneous costs totaled $445,702. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in August 1965 and the Krebs Lake project was completed in November 1983. The General Design Memorandum (GDM) was approved in June 1992 for deepening and widening channels. Preconstruction Engineering and Design is complete. The channel dredging contract was awarded in September 1994. Total Federal cost of existing project to September 30, 1998 is $14,722,227 for new work and $66,418,493 for maintenance, a total of $81,140,720. Contributed funds expended for maintenance amounted to $5,508,471. 20. PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL Location. The project is located in a landlocked bay on the coast of northwest Florida about 50 miles east of the entrance to Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 490 and 11382.) 10-14 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A 35-foot by 500-foot entrance channel about five miles long, from the Gulf of Mexico to lower Pensacola Bay; (b) a 33- foot by 300-foot bay channel; (c) two 33-foot by 300-foot parallel approach channels to opposite ends of the inner harbor channel; (d) an inner harbor channel 500 feet wide, 33 feet deep, and 3,950 feet long; (e) a 30-foot by 250-foot approach channel to the pierhead line south of Muscogee wharf; and (f) a 15-foot by 100-foot entrance channel into Bayou Chico, thence a channel 14 feet deep, 75 feet wide, and about 4,400 feet long to a turning basin 14 feet deep and 500 feet square. Mean range of tide throughout the harbor is about 1.1 feet near the entrance and about 1.6 feet at the head of bay. Extreme tidal range, except during storms, is about three feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Modification of the Bayou Chico project to provide for enlarging the entrance channel to 21 by 100 feet, the bayou channel to 20 feet by 100 feet, and deepening the turning basin to 20 feet has been deferred for restudy. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance:Environmental studies costs totaled $21,948. Condition at end of fiscal year. New work is completed except for features which are deferred for restudy. The modification authorized in 1962 was commenced in March and completed in May 1965. Total Federal cost of the existing project to September 30, 1998 is $1,469,693 for new work and $8,438,283 for maintenance, a total of $9,907,976. Contributed funds for maintenance amount to $297,587. 21. PERDIDO PASS CHANNEL, AL Location. The project is located about midway between Pensacola, Florida, and Mobile, Alabama. (See Coast and Geodetic Chart 11378.) Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide for about 1,300 feet from the Gulf of Mexico into the inlet, thence 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide for about 2,200 feet to the highway bridge, where the channel branches into two arms, each having dimensions of 9 by 100 feet, one of which extends about 3,400 feet into Terry Cove and the other about 3,200 feet into the southern arm of Perdido Bay. The project also provides for two jetties spaced 600 feet apart at the seaward end. The east jetty has a low weir section, 1000 feet long to permit passage of littoral drift into a dredged deposition basin 800 feet by 1,200 feet located between the east jetty and the navigation channel. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet and extreme is 2.8 feet. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Six marinas, numerous timber piers, docks, and several launching ramps are available. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous costs totaled $5,083. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was commenced in May 1968 and completed in May 1969. Total Federal cost of the existing project to September 30, 1998 is $629,860 for new work and $9,911,935 for maintenance, a total of $10,541,795. Contributions from local interest amount to $510,000 for new work and $10,325 for maintenance. 22. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL AND MS Location. The waterway extends from mile 215 in Pickwick pool on the Tennessee River, southerly through northeastern Mississippi and western Alabama, a total of 234 miles, to the confluence of the Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers at Demopolis, Alabama. Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1953. Existing project. The existing project provides for a waterway 234 miles long, connecting the Tennessee and Tombigbee Rivers via the East Fork of Tombigbee River and Mackeys and Yellow Creeks and consists of three sections as follows: (1) the river section, a 9-foot by 300-foot channel for 149 miles between Demopolis and Amory, Mississippi; (2) the canal section, 12 feet by 300 feet for 46 miles from Amory to Bay Springs; and (3) the divide section, a 12-foot by 300- foot channel (except in the 27 mile long divide cut in which the bottom width is 280 feet) for 39 miles from Bay Springs through the dividing ridge to the Tennessee River. The total life of 341 feet is accomplished by 10 locks (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests have made and are maintaining alterations in highways and highway bridges and in sewer, water-supply, and drainage facilities and provide and maintain suitable and adequate river and canal terminals. Officials of the State of Mississippi were notified of these requirements on December 13, 1949, and officials of the State of Alabama were notified on December 20, 1949. Legislation enabling boards of supervisors of the various counties 10-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 concerned to enter into agreements with theUnited States relative to navigation projects was adopted by the State of Mississippi in 1950. A compact between the States of Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky and Florida has been formed for the purpose of promoting the project. The name of this organization is the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway Development Authority. During its 1962 session the Mississippi Legislature authorized the formation of the Tombigbee River Valley Water Management District. The District was organized in accordance with the enabling legislation and is empowered to fulfill the requirements of local cooperation for the portion of the project in Mississippi. A satisfactory resolution has been furnished. During its 1967 session the Alabama Legislature authorized the formation of a public corporation to be named the Tombigbee Valley Development Authority for the purpose of further development of the Tombigbee River and tributary streams. The organization was formed in accordance with the enabling legislation and in a referendum held December 5, 1967 the voters of Alabama authorized a bond issue not to exceed $10,000,000 of finance participation in this project and the Tombigbee River and Tributaries project. A satisfactory resolution has been furnished. Terminal facilities. Docks, storage facilities and handling equipment are still being developed along this new waterway. As of September 30,1998, twelve such facilities were operational, while five were under construction, and five more are planned. The operational facilities are handling grain, wood chips, and logs. When all facilities are complete, about half will be publicly owned and operated. Additional ports and terminals must be completed before the waterway can achieve its full potential. (See Table 10-N for existing locks and dams.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Recreation facilities $90,435; real estate $6,288; engineering and design cost $20,161 and supervision and administration cost $10,698, a total of $127,582 for new work. Maintenance: Contract dredging on the river system cost $3,667,102. Total cost for operation and maintenance of the project for FY 98 amounted to $19,367,403, which included general charges of $9,035,435; Lock operations and maintenance cost $5,858,163. Recreation costs totaled $806,703. Recreation attendance for FY 1998 totaled 3,045,959 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total Federal cost under the existing project as of September 30, 1998 is $1,053,040,941 for new work, and $284,052,268 for maintenance for a total of $1,337,093,209. Construction formally began December 12, 1972 and overall project is essentially complete. There is currently one (1) recreational contract underway on the project. The waterway was opened for navigation in January 1985. 22A. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY WILDLIFE MITIGATION PROJECT, AL AND MS Location. This project is in Alabama and Mississippi at the following locations: (1) Existing Project Lands - Approximately 72,500 acres of Tennessee-Tombigbee Project Lands have been designated for mitigation purposes. An additional 20,100 acres have also been designated at Coffeeville Lake, Demopolis Lake, Claiborne Lake and Dannelly Lakes in Alabama and at Okatibbee Lake in Mississippi. (2) Separable Lands - Acquisition and management of 88,000 separable lands in the Mobile-Tensaw Delta, Alabama (not less than 20,000 acres); the Pascagoula, Pearl, and Mississippi Delta Basins in Mississippi (not less than 25,000 acres); and the balance at any location in the two states. Previous project. None. This project was a new construction start in Fiscal year 1990. It was authorized by Section 601 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Existing project. The authorized project calls for the acquisition of separable lands at the above named locations. The Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Mississippi Department of Wildlife Fisheries and Parks, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) assisted in the selection of separable lands. The selected lands are being purchased from willing sellers at fair market value. Emphasis is placed on forested wetlands, with a minimum of 34,000 acres of bottomland hardwoods being purchased. Management of Lands, the separable lands and the existing project lands designated for mitigation purposes will be managed for wildlife. The States will be primarily responsible for managing these lands in accordance with management plans jointly developed by the States, Corps and the FWS. However, due to operational constraints it will be necessary for the Corps to retain management responsibility for some of the existing project lands included in the mitigation program. Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement is not required since the cost of this project is a 100% Federal responsibility. Operation and results during fiscal year. Land acquisition cost $1,568,834. Equipment $96,823; and miscellaneous $406,485; Engineering and Design $639,721. Supervision and administration, $9,309. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial funding for the project was received in January 1990. At the end of September 10-16 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 1998, 21,182 acres had been acquired in the Mobile-Tensaw Delta; 13,433 acres in the Pascagoula Basin; 18,542 acres in the Mississippi Delta; 7,655 acres in the Pearl Basin; 14,378 acres in northeast Mississippi; and 12,292 acres in other areas of Alabama. A variety of activities also continued to intensively manage the 92,600 acres of existing project lands included in the Mitigation Program. Scheduled completion date is September 1999. The total project cost is estimated to be $94,042,000. Total Federal cost of the project as of September 30, 1998 is $89,359,878. 23. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 10-C.) 24. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT (See Table 10-D.) 25. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 10-E.) 26. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Table 10-G.) 27. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Table 10-H.) 28. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (Preauthorization). Studies conducted under this authority amounted to $32,190 in FY 1998. (See Table 10-H.) 29. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Table 10-J.) 30. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 10-K.) FLOOD CONTROL 31. BAYVIEW COURT, BAY ST. LOUIS, MS Location. Bayview Court is located in the City of Bay St. Louis, Mississippi. The project is on Mississippi Sound about 95 miles from Mobile, Alabama, on the east and about 50 miles from New Orleans, Louisiana, on the west. Existing project. This beach erosion project provides for construction of a 700 linear-foot concrete block revetment. The scarped project will be filled with clean sand, sloped, compacted, and covered with geotextile fabric. Interlocking concrete blocks form a block mat system, will then be placed over the prepared surface. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Office supplies $38. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in November 1995, and completed in May 1996. Total Federal cost to date is $247,400 for new work. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $111,337. 32. BLACK WARRIOR RIVER NORTHPORT LEVEE PROJECT, NORTHPORT, ALABAMA Location. The city of Northport is located along the Black Warrior River north and across the river from the city of Tuscaloosa, Alabama. The damage center of Northport is also about 60 miles west of the city of Birmingham, Alabama. Existing project. The project consists of a 3.2 mile levee construction to provide flood protection for the city of Northport, Alabama from over bank flows from the Black Warrior River. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction contract cost $2,412,799; supervision and administration cost $162,223 and other miscellaneous cost $8,053. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The project is scheduled for completion in March 1999. The total project construction costs is $5,979,000. Of this amount, the Federal share is $4,480,500 and the non-Federal share is $1,498,500. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1998 is $3,151,369 for new work. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $120,670. 33. CEDAR POINT SEAWALL BAY ST. LOUIS, MS Location. The project is located in the city of Bay St. Louis, Mississippi. It is on St. Louis Bay about 95 miles from Mobile, Alabama, on the east and about 50 miles from New Orleans, Louisiana, on the west. Existing project. The shoreline erosion project provides for construction of a 1,500 linear-foot concrete/sheetpile wall 10-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 constructed in front of an existing concrete seawall. Concrete will be placed between the new sheetpile walls and the bottom step of the existing concrete seawall. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction cost $1,224; and reconnasissance and feasbility studies $57,549. Conditions at end of fiscal year. Construction was authorized on September 9,1998, with contract award scheduled for November 27, 1998. Total Federal cost to date is $58,773 for new work. Contributed funds expended amounted to $0 for new work. 34. CHOCTAWHATCHEF/PEA RIVERS, ALABAMA AND FLORIDA Location. The Choctawhatchee and Pea River Basins are located in southeast, Alabama. The damage center of Elba is located approximately 68 miles southwest from the head water of the Pea River. The damage center of Geneva is located approximately 48 miles south from the head water of the Choctawhatchee River. Existing project. The project consists of the installation of 12 combination rain and stream gages and two raw gages within the Choctawhatchee and Pea River Basins. The base stations are located at Elba and Geneva, Alabama. The project is being upgraded to add one additional base station at New Brockton, Alabama. The flood warning system provides early warning time ranging between 18 to 36 hours. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Flood Control cost $27,790; engineering and design cost $3,794; and supervision and administration cost $3,026. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in September 1995. Total Federal cost to date is $265,549 for new work. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $98,815. 34A. CHOCTAWHATCHEE AND PEA RIVERS MINOR REHABILITATION PROJECTS ELBA AND GENEVA LEVEES, ALABAMA Location. The minor levee rehabilitation projects are located in the cities of Elba and Geneva, Alabama. The damage center of Elba is located approximately 68 miles southwest from the head waters along the Pea River. The damage center of Geneva is located at the confluence of the Pea River and the Choctawhatchee River, which is about 48 miles south from the headwaters of the Choctawhatchee River. Existing project. The Elba and Geneva projects consists of a 3.2 mile and a 2.7 mile long earthen levee system respectively, which were constructed by the Works Project Administration (WPA) in 1938. Project rehabilitation work consists of replacing or repairing culverts flap gates, installing sluice gates on the inside of the levee and clearing the underbrush along the levee side slopes. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: Real Estate analysis cost $5,287, engineering analysis cost $43,620, and supervision and administration $27,975. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The project is scheduled for completion in January 1999. The total project construction cost for the two projects is $1,195,800. Of this amount, the Federal share is $822,800 and the non-Federal share is $443,000. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1998 is $304,341 for new work. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $1,039. 35. HANCOCK COUNTY SEAWALL, HANCOCK COUNTY, MS Location. Hancock County is located on Mississippi Sound about 95 miles from Mobile, Alabama, on the east and about 50 miles from New Orleans, Louisiana, on the west. Existing project. The shoreline protection project for Hancock County consists of a 900-foot timber bulkhead, two feet in front of an existing concrete seawall. The project consists of 12-inch diameter timber face piling 5-foot on center. Attached to the piling is 4 x 8-inch timber walls which support 3 x 8-inch treated timber sheeting. The sheeting is backed by filter fabric, and earth fill is placed between the bulkhead and the seawall and sodded. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction contract cost $-1,000. Conditions at end of fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded April 1995, and was completed in August 1995. 10-18 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT Total Federal cost to date is $307,000 for new work. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $88,374. 36. KINGS CREEK AT GREEN STREET BRIDGE, TUPELO, MS Location. The project is located on Kings Creek, between Green Street and Spring Street in Tupelo, Mississippi. Existing project. The project provides riprap, sheet pile, and gabion slope and stream channel protection. A 9-foot high gabion wall begins 35 feet upstream of the bridge centerline and extends 37 feet downstream of the centerline along the right bank and 107 feet along the left bank. The channel bottom through the bridge is protected with 12 inch gabion baskets. Sheet piling supported by H-pile was constructed mid-bank at the terminus of the left bank gabion wall and extends 60 feet downstream. Riprap toe protection is placed along both banks between the project and the upstream end of the Spring Street Bridge, located approximately 300 feet downstream of Green Street. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and Design cost $5,756. Conditions at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated June 1996 and scheduled for completion in fiscal year 1999. Total Federal cost to date is $499,930 for new work. 37. SAINT LOUIS BAY, BAY ST. LOUIS, MS Location. The project is located in the city of Bay St. Louis, Mississippi. It is on St. Louis Bay about 95 miles from Mobile, Alabama, on the wast and about 50 miles from New Orleans, Louisiana, on the west. Existing project. The shoreline erosion project provides for construction of a 1,000 linear-foot concrete/sheetpile wall constructed in front of an existing concrete seawall. Concrete will be placed between the new sheetpile walls and the bottom step of the existing concrete seawall. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Bank stabilization cost $-2,000. Conditions at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in June 1997, and completed in December 1997. Total Federal cost to date is $237,400 for new work. Contributed funds expended amounted to $106,173 for new work. 38. OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS Location. The project is located on Okatibbee Creek 37.7 miles above its mouth, in Lauderdale County, Mississippi, seven miles northwest of Meridian. Existing project. The project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, fish and wildlife, and recreation. The dam consists of a compacted earth fill 6,540 feet long with the top elevation 369.8 feet above national geodetic datum, with top width of 18 feet. The spillway, which is located 1,500 feet east of the east end of the dam, is an unpaved free overflow type, 1,500 feet long with a fixed crest at elevation 359. A sluice intake structure near the center of the dam serves a 9.0-foot diameter concrete conduit. Storage allocated for water supply and water quality control varies seasonally from 21,400 acre-feet to 34,300 acre-feet between a minimum elevation of 328 and top-of-conservation-pool elevation varying from 339 to 343. Storage varying from 46,500 to 59,500 acre-feet between the top of the conservation pool and elevation 352 has been reserved exclusively for storage of flood waters. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Costs for the year for ordinary maintenance and recreational management amount to $1,517,668. Recreation attendance at the reservoir during FY 1998 totaled 904,181 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1965, and was completed in November 1968. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1998 is $9,739,528 for new work and $24,933,412 for maintenance, a total of $34,672,940. 39. SOWASHEE CREEK, MERIDIAN, MS Location. The project is located in East Central Mississippi, Lauderdale County, in the city of Meridian, which is approximately 90 miles east of Jackson, Mississippi. Existing project. In 1955, the Corps of Engineers completed channel improvement on the lower 10.5 miles of Sowashee Creek. This work was accomplished under the authority of Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. The plan of improvement consists of a combination of channel enlargement (3.9 miles), and clearing and snagging (6.6 miles) over a reach of 10.5 miles. One (1) railroad bridge and several highway roads and bridges and utilities will require modification for the channel improvement. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement with the Pat Harrison Waterway District was completed on September 23, 1987. The local sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. 10-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design $2,317. Condition at end of fiscal year. All contracts have been completed except for the recreation contract. Plans and specifications for the expanded recreation were initiated in FY 1993 and were completed in FY 1994. Construction contract award is unscheduled. An Operation and Maintenance Manual was provided to the city. Current estimated Federal cost is $19,718,000; and the non-Federal portion is $12,782,000. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1998 is $15,896,581 for new work. Contributed funds expended $1,218,036. 40. THREEMILE CREEK, MOBILE, AL Location. The project is located near the Gulf of Mexico in the southwest corner of the state of Alabama and in the city of Mobile, approximately 180 miles southwest of Montgomery, Alabama. Threemile Creek originates in the western part of Mobile and flows easterly about 14 miles to enter Mobile River near the Alabama State Docks. The drainage area of the basin consists of 39 square miles of urbanized area. Existing project. None. The authorized flood control project will consist of channel widening and deepening from about 2,000 feet downstream of Stone Street to a point about 6,300 feet upstream of Interstate 65 or a total distance of 5.6 miles. The plan also includes development of certain recreational facilities of the type associated with urban parks. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement with the city of Mobile, Alabama was completed on September 30, 1987. The local sponsor has agreed to make all payments concurrently with project construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Reimbursable funding $435,610. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete and has been turned over to the local sponsor. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1998 is $17,381,352 for new work. Contributed funds expended $1,216,000. 41. TOMBIGBEE RIVER (EAST FORK), MS AND AL Location. The project is located on the Tombigbee River and its tributaries between the junction of the Browns and Mackeys Creek in Itawamba County, Mississippi, for a distance of 53 miles along the East Fork of the Tombigbee River, from Walkers Bridge at the junction of Browns and Mackeys Creeks to the Monroe County line. Existing project. Provides for alleviation of floods from the Tombigbee River by clearing and snagging and excavation of 13 cut-off channels, and other related channel improvements. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with on work done under the 1963 Flood Control Act. Work to be done under authority of the 1941 Flood Control Act requires local interest to provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction of the project; and maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine maintenance of channels cost $226,477. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project for Itawamba County, as authorized in the 1936 Flood Control Act, was completed during fiscal year 1940. No work has been done on the extension of the project authorized in the 1941 Flood Control Act. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1998 is $134,801 for new work and $3,840,885 for maintenance, a total of $3,975,686. 42. TOMBIGBEE RIVER TRIBUTARIES, MS AND AL Location. The Tombigbee River rises in extreme northeast Mississippi and flows southerly through eastern Mississippi and western Alabama, emptying into the Mobile River about 45 miles above its mouth at Mobile, Alabama. Tributaries to be improved for flood control are all in northeast Mississippi and northwest Alabama. Luxapalila Creek project consists of 2.1 miles of completed channel modifications. The remaining effort consists of approximately 26 miles of various channel work. Approved estimate of cost for new work is $42,108,000; consisting of $37,743,000 Federal funds, and $4,365,000 non- Federal funds. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction; make all roads, highway bridge, and utility changes, alterations, additions, and relocations necessary for the project; hold the United States free from damages; prevent future encroachments along the improved channels; maintain all works after completion, with the exception of Twenty Mile Creek from mile 11.7 to mile 22.0. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $804,567. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in July 1965, and is proceeding stream by stream as funds are 10-20 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT made available. Total project is 98% complete. Luxapalila Creek is the only remaining work scheduled to be accomplished. The main construction contract was awarded in June 1994, and was completed in December 1997. The only remaining work involves a "clean-up" contract of the lower 2.1 mile segment that was completed in 1973 before litigation delayed the remaining work. Total Federal cost of existing project as of September 30, 1998 is $38,132,070 for new work. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $547,968. 43. UPPER GORDON CREEK, HATTIESBURG, MS Location. The proposed project on Gordons Creek is located in Hattiesburg, MS. Existing project. A Federal project on the lower 2.5 miles was constructed in 1979 under the Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948. The project consisted of clearing and snagging from the creek's confluence with the Leaf River upstream to Bay Street and channel widening to a 40-foot bottom width between Bay and Broad Streets. The work will consist of real estate acquisition of eight (8) residences and removal from floodplain; habitat mitigation and channel enlargement for 1.1 miles between Broad and Hardy Streets; and flood damages mitigation downstream of Broad Street. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Real Estate cost $8,347; engineering and design cost $2,001. Condition at end of fiscal year. The construction contract was awarded in April 1994, and construction was completed in April 1995. Necessary right-of-ways for channel improvement are available and necessary relocations performed by non-federal sponsors. Also, acquisition of twenty-one (21) residences for mitigation is underway. Total Federal cost to date is $3,829,147 for new work. Contributed funds expended $130,689. 44. VILLAGE CREEK, BIRMINGHAM, AL Location. The project is located in central Alabama, Jefferson County, in the city of Birmingham, Alabama. Existing project. None. The project is basically nonstructural and includes evacuating 642 structures, in six (6) separate neighborhoods, from the floodplain; enlarging 2 miles of the stream channel in the vicinity of the Municipal Airport which also involves modification of three (3) bridges, demolishing two (2) unused bridges, and relocating two (2) waterlines and other utilities, installing three (3) emergency floodwarning devices; and creating an area of 210 acres which can be utilized for future recreation development. Channel enlargements (2 miles) will reduce annual damages near Municipal Airport by 82 percent and evacuation of 642 structures will reduce annual damages in residential areas by 61 percent. The channel segment is not being constructed at the request of the sponsor. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement with the city of Birmingham, Alabama was executed on December 14, 1988. The local sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with the project construction. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Real Estate cost $3,069; engineering and design, $42,794. Condition at end of fiscal year. Real Estate design memorandum completed February 1988. Real Estate acquisition started January 1989. The project is complete with acquisition of 634 tracts. Current estimated Federal cost is $26,912,000; and the non-Federal portion is $10,388,000. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1998 is $22,860,239 for new work. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $7,203,102. 45. WAVELAND SEAWALL, WAVELAND, MS Location. The city of Waveland is in the southern portion of Hancock County, Mississippi. It is located on Mississippi Sound about 95 miles from Mobile, Alabama, on the east and about 50 miles from New Orleans, Louisiana, on the west. Existing project. The shoreline protection project for Waveland, Mississippi, consists of a 1,008 linear-foot concrete/ sheetpile wall segment, and a 500 linear-foot concrete/sheetpile wall segment constructed in front of an existing concrete seawall. Concrete was placed between the new sheetpile walls and the bottom step of the existing concrete seawalls. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract cost $-3,000. Conditions at end of fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded in April 1995, and completed in June 1995. Total Federal costs to date are $453,000, and contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $136,923. 46. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). 10-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Snagging and Clearing for flood control pursuant to Section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1954, as amended. Emergency streambank and shoreline protection pursuant to Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. (See Table 10-J) Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work under Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation, and disaster relief and assistance under Public law 288, 93d Congress. (See Table 10-J) 47. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Local flood protection works for which inspection is performed under this heading consist of levee projects at West Point, Georgia, on the Chattahoochee River; Beaver Creek at Montezuma, Georgia, in the Flint River Basin; Elba and Geneva, Alabama in the Choctawhatchee River Basin; Rome, Georgia, and Little Wills Creek at Collinsville, Alabama, in the Alabama-Coosa River Basin. Channel rectification projects include Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, Alabama and Black Creek, Gadsden, Alabama in the Alabama-Coosa River Basin; Big Brown Creek, Donivan Creek, Twenty Mile Creek and Mantachie Creek, near Fulton, Mississippi, Burketts Creek and Stanifer Creek near Amory, Mississippi, Houlka Creek and Sakatonchee Creek in Chickasaw and Clay Counties, Mississippi, James Creek in Monroe County, Mississippi, and Luxapalila Creek, Lowndes County, Mississippi, all in the Tombigbee River Basin; Sowashee Creek, Meridian, Mississippi in the Pascagoula River Basin; Burnt Corn and Murder Creeks, Brewton, Alabama in the Conecuh River Basin; Autauga Creek, Prattville, Alabama; Poley Bridge, Goose Pond and Walnut Creeks, Clanton, Alabama; Pinchgut Creek, and Cahaba River, Trussville, Alabama; Town Creek, Americus, Georgia; and Lake Douglas in Bainbridge, Georgia. Shore protection and erosion control projects include Harrison County, Mississippi; Chattahoochee River at La Grange, Troup County, Georgia; Pumpkinvine Creek, Emerson, Georgia; and Chickasawbogue Creek, US Highway 43 Bridge, Linden, Alabama. The project at Rome and Montezuma, Georgia and Collinsville, Alabama include pumping stations. Inspections were made during FY 91 to determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation of the project. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in the maintenance and operation of the local flood protection works under their jurisdiction where appropriate. Followup for compliance of the deficient projects continued during the year. Fiscal year costs were $18,170. Total cost to September 30, 1998 is $784,683 charged to maintenance. 48. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 10-E.) Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Multiple Purpose Power Projects 49. ALLATOONA DAM, COOSA RIVER BASIN, GA Location. The project is on Etowah River in Bartow County, Georgia, about 48 miles upstream from Rome, Georgia, about five miles due east of Cartersville, Georgia, and about 2,000 feet downstream from mouth of Allatoona Creek. The reservoir extends about 28 miles up the Etowah River at maximum power-pool elevation of 840 feet above mean sea level. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, regulation of streamflow for navigation, and development of hydroelectric power. Height above the river bottom of the concrete, gravity-type dam is about 190 feet, from elevation 690 feet to 880 feet national geodetic datum. The spillway, with crest at elevation 835, is controlled by nine tainter gates, 40 feet wide by twenty-six feet high, and two tainter gates, 20 feet wide by twenty-six feet high; having a combined discharge capacity of 321,000 cubic feet per second with the water surface at elevation 870.3. One 48-inch diameter sluicing conduit with a free discharge valve and four sluices, 5 feet-8 inches wide by 10 feet high, are included in dam. Installed generating capacity consists of two 36,000 kilowatt units and one 2,000 kilowatt unit, or a total of 74,000 kilowatts. The reservoir, covering 19,200 acres at elevation 860, has a storage capacity of 670,000 acre-feet. The initial construction cost was $31,424,738, excluding the addition of recreation facilities at the completed project. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. (Sec. 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies). Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the dam, reservoir, powerhouse, service and recreational activities, and administration totaled $5,549,977. Gross power generation amounted to 221,041,800 kilowatt hours during FY 1998 of which 217,718,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance at Allatoona Lake during FY 1998 totaled 6,003,600 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the existing project began in March 1944 and was completed in October 1955. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1998 is $35,709,085 for new work and $124,312,719 for maintenance, a total of $160,021,804. 10-22 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 50. BUFORD DAM, LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA Location. Buford Dam is on the Chattahoochee River about 348.9 miles above its mouth, 50 miles above Atlanta and five miles northwest of Buford, Georgia. The reservoir, Lake Sidney Lanier, extends about 47 miles upstream along the Chattahoochee River, and about 21 miles up the Chestatee River, which enters the Chattahoochee River 14.5 miles above the dam. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a rolled-earth dam 1,630 feet long with crest elevation 1,106 feet national geodetic datum, or about 192 feet above streambed elevation; three earth saddle dikes with a total length of 5,406 feet; a chute spillway with crest at elevation 1,085; a powerhouse in a deep cut with steel penstocks in tunnels, and concrete intake structure at the upstream end of the tunnels; and a flood control sluice tunnel paralleling the power tunnels. The Lake Sidney Lanier reservoir has a gross capacity of 2,554,000 acre-feet of which 637,000 acre-feet of storage is reserved for flood control storage. The power installations consist of one generating unit of 6,000 kilowatts and two units of 40,000 kilowatts each, or a total of 86,000 kilowatts. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost $6,506,257. Gross power generation amounted to 257,244,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1998, of which 251,979,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Lake Sidney Lanier during FY 1998 totaled 7,545,208 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in March 1950 and was completed in June 1960. The reservoir was in useful operation for flood control in February 1956. The first power generating unit was placed on the line June 19, 1957; the second on July 26, 1957; and the third on October 10, 1957. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1998 is $53,030,038 for new work, major rehabilitation cost $711,615 and $154,316,415 for maintenance, a total of $208,058,068. (See also Table 10- M.) 51. CARTERS DAM AND RESERVOIR, GA Location. The damsite is in Murray County, Georgia, on the Coosawattee River 26.8 miles above its junction with Conasauga River, one of the headwater tributaries of the Alabama-Coosa system. It is 60 miles north of Atlanta near the town of Oakman, Georgia. The reservoir is in both Murray and Gilmer Counties. Existing project. The existing project consists of a 1,950- foot long rockfill dam across the river, three saddle dikes on the left bank, a 258-foot long high-level, gated spillway on the left bank, a powerhouse on the right bank having two conventional units with a generating capacity of 125,000 kilowatts each and two pump-generating units of the same size, and a regulating dam 2,855 feet long with a gated spillway 208 feet long 1.5 miles downstream from the main dam. The lake has an area of 3,220 acres, at maximum pool power elevation 1,072, total capacity of 472,800 acre-feet, of which 134,900 acre-feet is usable for power and 95,700 acre-feet reserved for flood control and 242,200 acre-feet dead storage. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the dam, reservoir, powerhouse, service and recreational activities and administration totaled $4,544,616. Gross power generation amounted to 348,147,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1998, of which 158,249,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance during FY 1998 totaled 562,528 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction which commenced in April 1962 and completed in September 1980. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1998 is $190,142,076, including $111,140,340 for new work and $79,001,736 for maintenance. 52. JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, GA AND FL Location. The project is located on the Apalachicola River 107.6 miles above its mouth, about 1,000 feet below confluence of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, and 1.5 miles northwest of Chattahoochee, Florida. Reservoir extends about 46.5 miles upstream along the Chattahoochee River to the vicinity of Columbia, Alabama, and about 47 miles upstream along Flint River, or 17 miles above Bainbridge, Georgia. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Existing project. The existing project provides for a concrete open-crest spillway 1,634 feet long on the right bank, with a crest at elevation 79 feet national geodetic datum; a single-lift lock with usable chamber dimensions of 82 by 450 constituting a portion of the dam; an earth section 506 feet feet, a maximum lift of 33 feet, and depth over the sills of 14 feet; a gated spillway 766 feet long with the bridge at elevation 107 feet national geodetic datum, or about 67 feet above the streambed elevation; a powerhouse with an intake section 10-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 constituting a portion of the dam; an earth section 506 feet long to accommodate the switchyard and substation; and an overflow dike section 2,130 feet long on the left bank, with a crest at elevation 85. The underlying foundation is limestone. At the normal pool elevation of 77, the reservoir has a total capacity of 406,160 acre-feet. The power installation consists of three units of 10,000 kilowatts each, or a total of 30,000 kilowatts. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Required cooperation is being fulfilled. Easements for rights-of-way and spoil-disposal areas were provided as required along the Apalachicola River. Adequate public terminals were constructed by local interests at Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, and at Columbia, Alabama, on the Chattahoochee River. Facilities are being planned for other localities on the project. Terminal facilities. A public wharf with concrete deck for handling general cargo, a bulk storage terminal for petroleum, a grain elevator, and private riverside facilities at Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost $6,614,769. Gross power generation, Jim Woodruff Powerhouse, amounted to 181,934,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1998, of which 179,556,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Lake Seminole during FY 1998 totaled 1,020,094 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the lock was commenced in 1947, and completed in 1957. The pool was opened to navigation in May 1954, and the pool was raised to project level in January 1957. The first power-generating unit was placed on-the-line on February 1, the second on March 1, and the third April 26, 1957. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1998 is $47,978,858 for new work, major rehabilitation cost $3,484,439 and $111,037,108 for maintenance, a total of $162,500,405. (See also Table 10-M.) 53. MILLERS FERRY LOCK AND DAM, AL Location. The site is in Wilcox County at mile 142.2 on the Alabama River, 10 miles northwest of Camden, Alabama, and 30 miles southwest of Selma. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earth dike on the right bank, a concrete, gravity-gated spillway in the river channel, a lock and mound on the left bank, an earth dike extending downstream paralleling the lock, to the powerhouse intake structure; a powerhouse, and an earth dike extending to high ground on the left bank. Normal upper pool is at elevation 80. The powerplant contains two 25,000 kilowatt units and one 30,000 kilowatt unit. The 103-mile long reservoir has an area of 17,200 acres at normal pool level and a total capacity of 331,800 acre-feet. The lock chamber is 84 by 600 feet with a 13-foot depth over the miter sills. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of lock, dam, powerhouse, reservoir, and administration cost $6,182,153. Gross power generation amounted to 315,971,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1998, of which 308,813,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance at William "Bill" Dannelly Reservoir during FY 1998 totaled 1,725,000 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1963. The lock was placed in temporary operations in June 1968 and opened to full use in November 1969. The powerhouse units were placed on line during April and May 1970. The project was completed in 1980. Total Federal cost of the project as of September 30, 1998 is $63,125,300 for new work and $78,276,782 for maintenance, a total of $141,402,082. 54. ROBERT F. HENRY LOCK AND DAM, AL Location. The site is in Lowndes and Autauga Counties at mile 281.2 on the Alabama River, 26 miles west of Montgomery. Existing project. The existing project provides for a navigation lock, a gated spillway, and a power plant located at mile 281.2. The normal upper pool is at elevation 125.0 and the minimum lower pool due to the Millers Ferry Lock and Dam is at elevation 80.0. The structures consist of earth dikes and a power plant on the right bank, a gated spillway in the river channel, a lock and mound on the left bank, and an earth dike extending upstream parallel to the Western Railway of Alabama. The total length of the structures is about 14,962 feet with maximum height above the foundation at the power plant intake about 101 feet. The power plant contains four 20,500-kw. units. The 88-mile long reservoir has an area of 12,300 acres at normal pool level and a total capacity of 234,200 acre-feet. The lock has a chamber 84 feet wide and 600 feet long and provides a 12-foot depth over the lower miter sill. For other information see description of Alabama- Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance costs amounted to $4,270,283. Gross power generation amounted to 10-24 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 377,904,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1998, of which 374,313,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance during FY 1998 totaled 1,370,121 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in March 1966 and is complete. The first powerhouse unit was placed in operation in June 1975, with the last unit on line in November 1975. Total Federal cost of the project as of September 30, 1998 is $141,584,561, including $83,360,800 for new work and $58,223,761 for maintenance. 55. WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL AND GA Location. The project is on the Chattahoochee River about 75.2 miles above its mouth and about 1.5 miles above Fort Gaines, Georgia. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Existing project. The existing project provides for a concrete dam, gated spillway, and single-lift lock, with earth embankments at either side. The non-overflow section of the dam includes a powerhouse and an intake structure. The gated spillway is 708 feet long with a fixed crest at elevation 163 feet national geodetic datum. The two earth embankments, of almost equal lengths, have a total length of 12,128 feet, with a crest elevation at 215, and a maximum height of about 68 feet. The nonoverflow section of the concrete dam is 200 feet long, with the deck of the powerhouse section at elevation 208. The lock, with usable chamber dimensions of 82 feet by 450 feet, has a lift of 88 feet with the normal upper pool elevation at 190. Depths are 13 feet over the lower sill and 18 feet over the upper sill at normal pool elevation. The underlying foundation is limestone. Total reservoir capacity is 934,400 acre-feet, with 244,000 acre-feet reserved for power. The power installation consists of four units of 32,500 kilowatts each, or a total of 130,000 kilowatts. The project provides for maintenance, including operation and care. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must maintain and operate all utility and highway facilities which may be relocated or otherwise altered as part of the improvement, provide suitable public terminal facilities, and hold the United States free from damages. Local agencies and other organizations have indicated their willingness and ability to comply. Terminal facilities. Public wharves at Eufaula and Phenix City, Alabama, and Columbus, Georgia, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost for FY 1998 was $6,643,568. Gross power generation amounted to 621,598,000 kilowatt hours, of which 614,409,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance during FY 1998 totaled 6,213,639 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in 1963. The lock was opened to navigation in June 1963. The first power generating unit was placed on-the-line in March, the second in May, the third in September, and the fourth in November 1963. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1998 is $88,330,669 for new work, major rehabilitation cost $11,836,888 and $145,165,372 for maintenance, a total cost of $245,332,929. (See also Table 10-M.) 56. WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER BASIN, GA AND AL Location. The damsite is on the Chattahoochee River 2.8 miles upstream from West Point, Georgia, 201.4 miles above the mouth of the Chattahoochee River, and 309.2 miles above the mouth of the Apalachicola River. At the full power pool elevation of 635 feet above national geodetic datum, the reservoir would lie in Troup and Heard Counties, Georgia, and in Chambers and Randolph Counties, Alabama (See Geological Survey maps of Georgia and Alabama.) Existing project. The existing project provides for flood control, power, recreation, fish and wildlife development, and streamflow regulation for downstream navigation. The project provides for a gravity-type concrete dam 896 feet long with earth embankments at either end 1,111 feet long on the east end and 5,243 feet long on the west end. The total length of the dam and spillway is 7,250 feet. The main dam consists of a concrete non-overflow section, 185 feet long on the west side and an earth embankment retaining wall on the east side; a gravity concrete spillway 390 feet long, including piers and abutments, with six tainter gates, each 50 feet by 41 feet. A monolith intake-powerhouse section and erection bay 321 feet long is constructed directly west and adjacent to the spillway. At the full power-pool elevation of 635 the reservoir provides a total storage of 605,000 acre-feet of which 307,000 acrefeet is usable. During the critical flood season the reservoir is operated with maximum power pool elevation at 625 feet to provide flood storage between elevations 625 and 635. The initial power installation of 73,375 kilowatts consisting of units 1,2 and 3 were placed in operation in March and April, 1975. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. 10-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the project totaled $4,792,049. Gross power generation amounted to 292,896,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1998, of which 206,537,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance during FY 1998 totaled 2,195,100 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project, which was initiated in June 1966, and completed at the end of FY 1984. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1998 is $131,565,760 for new work and $93,412,446 for maintenance, a total of $224,978,206 (See also Table 10-M.) 57. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Mobile District monitors flood control operations of Alabama Power Company's Weiss, H. Neely Henry, and Logan Martin Dams on Coosa River, Alabama, and their Lewis Smith Dam on Sipsey Fork (headwaters of Black Warrior River, Alabama), for compliance with regulation plans prepared in accordance with Public Law 436, 83rd Congress, and Federal Power Commission licenses. Fiscal year cost for these activities on the Weiss, H. Neely Henry, and Logan Martin Dams are included under operation and maintenance costs for the Alabama-Coosa Rivers. Fiscal year cost for the Lewis Smith Dam is included under the overall operation and maintenance costs for the Black Warrior-Tombigbee Rivers System. 58. FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES (FC & CE) Disaster Preparedness Program .......................... $560,204 Emergency Operations .......................................... 484,468 Rehabilitation ................................................. 96,299 Miscellaneous Reimbursable .............................. 2,462,281 Total FC & CE $3,603,252 59. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM (NEPP) Mobilization Preparedness ...................................... $19,663 Government Preparedness ......................................... 86,942 Emergency Facilities ................................................. 3,750 Total NEPP $110,355 60. REGULATORY FUNCTIONS PROGRAM Perm it Evaluation ..................................... $1,843,805 Enforcem ent .......................................................... 552,305 Studies ....................................................................... 2,387 Other Navigational Regulations ................................ 6,014 Coastal M ississippi EIS ............................................ 3,608 Total Regulatory 61. $2,408,119 PROJECT MODIFICATION TO IMPROVE ENVIRONMENT (Sec. 1135) Coordination Account Funds ................................. $8,070 Initial Appraisals ..................................... 54,814 Lake Seminole Habitat ..................................... 32,715 Twentymile Creek Habitat, MS ........................... 469,460 Demopolis Lake Waterfowl ....................................... 816 Total Improvement (Sec. 1135, P.L. 99-662) $565,875 General Investigations 62. SURVEYS During FY 1998, costs of $581,464 were incurred as shown below: Flood Damage Preventive Studies........................ $31,912 Navigation Studies ..................................... 225,938 Special Studies ..................................... 163,136 Coordination with Other Agencies, and non-Federal Interests ....................................... 57,198 Miscellaneous Activities ......................................... 103,280 Total Surveys $581,464 63. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Collection and study of basic data continued during the fiscal year with the initiation of Flood Insurance studies, the cost of which was reimbursable by FEMA. In addition, Flood Plain Management Services were performed at a cost of $354,411 and $5,787 expended for Hydrologic Studies. (See Table 10- P for listings of studies completed during FY 1998.) 64. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Panama City Harbor. The authorized plan of improvements are the same as described in existing project (see Section 15 in 10-26 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT text). Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) is currently 100% complete. A General Reevaluation Report (GRR) was approved in August 1995. Plans and specifications were completed in September 1996. Fiscal year 1998 expenditures were $405. Wolf and Jordan Rivers, MS. The authorized plan provides for deepening the existing industrial channel from 7 by 100 feet to 8 by 100 feet for about 4 1/2 miles from the end of the 200 by 800 foot turning basin to the 8-foot depth contour in St. Louis Bay. Plans and specifications were initiated in January 1997 and are scheduled to be completed in April 1998. Estimate Preconstruction, Engineering and Design cost is $500,000. Fiscal year 1998 expenditures were $198,647. Total FY 1998 expenditures for Preconstruction, Engineering and Design (PED) were $199,052. 65. RIVERS AND HARBORS CONTRIBUTED FUNDS Contributed funds expended for authorized Federal studies included: Atlanta Sewer, GA .................................................. $5,190 Pascagoula Harbor, MS ............................................. 48,231 Planning Assistance to States .................................. 26,384 Total Contributed Funds $79,805 10-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 10-A see Section in Text Project Navigation 1. Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL and GA 1A. Claibome Lock and Dam, AL IB. Coosa River, Montgomery to Gadsden, AL 2. Apalachicola Bay, FL 3. Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, AL and GA 3A. George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, AL and GA 4. Aquatic Plant Control (Contributed Funds) 5. Bayou Coden, AL (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds) 6. Bayou La Batre, AL (Contributed Funds) 7. Biloxi Harbor, MS (Contributed Funds) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 Sept. 30, 1998 New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 3,245,400 3,245,400 5,258,000 5,293,066 534,000 551,789 5,121,000 5,074,840 30 30 50,000 4,114 54,000 51,620 50,000 74,606 31,000 27,163 71,000 1,053,000 1,411,896 4,357,300 4,588,337 90,000 93,327 5,433,000 5,554,039 30 30 30,000 28,038 16,000 12,313 84,357 297,000 227,956 43,000 39,721 74,235 278,600 284,012 10-28 5,514,980 5,519,831 228,000 185,911 4,311,283 4,298,317 30 30 38,891 511,100 444,755 80,340 1,763,000 1,612,688 1,805,000 1,723,601 100,000 162,034 1,109,000 1,074,719 4,661,000 4,604,697 -8,000 37,483 6,059,500 6,050,362 30 30 8,796 -68,000 4,805 25,000 54,123 317,500 371,420 537,000 563,709 109,875,16824 109,726,59924 27,997,450 27,997,450 14,986,40023 14,986,40023 2,033,461' 2,033,461' 5,356,0582 5,352,0832 4,452,16226 4,452,16226 125,139,04727 125,035,30927 13,038,42729 13,038,42729 30 30 969,187 921,611 21,225 21,225 330,7013 330,7013 1,687,858 1,687,769 100,000 100,000 134,357 130,340 5,971,095 5,777,691 6,246,246 6,211,332 697,5004 697,5004 1,431,9195 1,431,9195 14,871,7956 14,853,6306 102,600 102,600 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 Sept. 30, 1998 (Contributed Funds) Maint.: 8. Black Warrior & Tombigbee Rivers, AL 8A. Jackson Port Jackson, AL 8B. Oliver Lock & Dam (Replacement), AL (Contributed Funds) 9. Bon Secour River, AL (Contributed Funds) 10. Carrabelle Bar and Harbor, FL 11. Dauphin Island, Bay, AL (Contributed Funds) 12. Dog and Fowl Rivers, AL (Contributed Funds) 13. East Pass Channel From Gulf of Mexico into Choctwhatchee Bay, FL (Contributed Funds) 14. Fly Creek, AL Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 19,596,000 19,016,936 156,000 175,093 1,829,946 1,807,852 15,000 -12,917 15,000 12,298 10,000 7,607 -1,778 2,187 -26,000 9,724 16,531,000 16,664,516 129,000 81,955 719,120 619,310 10,000 35,480 253,000 250,154 675,000 676,095 18,916,779 19,583,480 318,000 233,483 58,395 20,379,990 20,603,059 563,000 514,582 1,206 74,658 70,000 80,168 47,000 9,670 75,000 64,398 66,000 76,070 14,000 13,614 533,000 570,695 -11,000 4,335 48,000 48,086 376 681,000 641,669 1,057,000 1,038,915 974,850 1,037,542 -9,000 9,703 238,640 238,640 88,461,9357 88,461,9357 377,444,8638 377,117,7398 52,292,880 52,292,880 2,116,000 1,909,089 61,409,000 61,386,051 62,500,000 62,451,012 150,615 150,615 1,495,258 1,493,707 9,700 9,700 481,627 481,627 1,034,385 1,032,044 292,864 292,864 2,785,626 2,784,932 41,422 41,422 391,354 391,354 3,759,686 3,759,248 197,450 195,626 916,715 916,715 13,067,961 13,066,899 398,000 398,000 29,000 29,000 10-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 Sept. 30, 1998 15. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and Mexican Border 16. Gulfport Harbor, MS (Contributed Funds) 17. Mobile Harbor, AL (Contributed Funds) 18. Panama City Harbor, FL (Contributed Funds) 19. Pascagoula Harbor, MS (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds) 20. Pensacola Harbor, FL (Contributed Funds) 21. Perdido Pass Channel, AL Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost -1,599 3,414,000 3,414,781 205,013 2,250,000 2,207,283 144,999 73,000 62,669 18,251,000 17,557,637 176,000 138,189 5,044,000 4,811,249 2,643,00 2,771,101 2,400,000 1,206,566 345,994 62,000 60,396 927,000 926,863 103,000 102,106 3,985,000 4,048,591 100,000 109,725 1,579,700 1,643,962 1 6,152 19,570,000 20,344,111 65,000 10,000 674,000 706,189 2,179,000 2,374,696 1,621,000 1,644,907 525,000 2,473,061 365,000 547,343 304 30,400 30,410 75,000 55,456 4,680,090 4,644,492 27,005 1,995,000 1,678,098 131,977 100,000 104,360 20,554,000 20,520,942 43,650 2,729,000 2,727,876 550,000 574,454 3,035,900 2,799,202 -412,717 375,000 386,293 60,000 41,273 1,231,000 1,110,701 8,500 31,598 5,810,000 5,810,074 30,034 443,000 744,059 300,000 46,118 20,199,000 20,077,190 150,000 157,492 -27,000 -11,439 751,000 136,363 3,097,000 3,294,586 400,000 317,086 3,000 21,948 -45,000 5,083 853,221 853,042 6,480,2999 6,480,2999 87,042,33610 86,976,53310 24,179,000" 24,172,374" 53,498,20212 53,450,55312 9,495,000 8,976,028 96,631,93513 96,363,30013 257,650,340 ' 4 257,287,95314 18,667,500 18,663,642 1,638,045'15 1,638,04515 13,014,01316 13,011,83916 80,000 80,000 15,385,985'7 14,722,227'7 66,460,49218 66,418,49318 3,765,000 3,347,533 5,596,884 5,508,471 1,469,693 9 1,469,69319 8,441,35820 8,438,28320 312,350 297,587 629,860 629,860 9,986,617 9,911,935 10-30 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-A (Continued) See Section in Text Project (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds) 22. Tennessee- Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS 22A. Tenn-Tom Wildlife Mitigation Flood Control 31. Bayview Court Bay St. Louis, MS (Contributed Funds) 32. Black Warrior River Northport Levee, AL (Contributed Funds) 33. Cedar Point Seawall Bay St. Louis, MS 34. Choctawhatchee and Pea Rivers, AL and FL (Contributed Funds) 34A. Choctawhatchee and Pea Rivers, Elba and Geneva Levees, AL (Contributed Funds) 35. Hancock Co. Seawall, Hancock County, MS (Contributed Funds) 36. Kings Creek Tupelo, MS (Contributed Funds) 37. Saint Louis Bay, Bay St. Louis, MS (Contributed Funds) 38. Okatibbee Dam, MS Funding New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 Sept. 30, 1998 980,000 3,168,823 21,351,000 20,920,787 11,081,000 15,598,516 264,400 85,704 120,800 105,000 99,523 239,800 27,980 97,300 70,000 51,404 213,000 221,019 88,000 85,083 440,000 87,694 244,000 76,092 110,079 -167,000 944,336 19,518,000 19,945,758 10,662,000 12,167,962 123,669 120,800 275,000 193,016 170,696 44,526 350,000 86,397 12,779 155,965 136,600 154,663 110,029 925,000 1,028,697 21,849,010 21,965,942 3,351,000 5,822,930 -2,000 37,989 -9,463 -9,463 3,198,000 129,018 299,000 4,711 7,500 36,560 2,487 46,723 -110,000 89,659 -12,000 -1,415 374 3,291 198,519 112,068 -5,000 6,645 -3,906 -3,856 127,582 19,338,290 19,367,403 4,040,000 2,721,172 -15,000 38 2,583,075 115,958 80,000 58,773 112,500 34,610 15,000 7,566 423,000 76,882 1,039 -1,000 5,756 7,601 -2,000 510,000 510,000 10,325 10,325 1,053,352,20021 1,053,040,9412 284,415,48522 284,052,26822 91,800,000 89,359,878 247,400 247,400 111,337 111,337 3,729,264 3,151,369 299,000 120,670 80,000 58,773 359,800 265,549 114,787 98,815 733,000 304,341 148,000 1,039 308,000 307,000 88,374 88,374 500,000 499,930 136,600 119,669 237,400 237,400 106,173 106,173 9,739,528 9,739,528 10-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 Sept. 30, 1998 Maint.: Approp. 1,605,000 1,524,000 1,736,875 1,518,000 24,964,710 Cost 1,569,897 1,537,858 1,794,079 1,517,668 24,933,412 39. Sowashee Creek, New Work: Meridian, MS Approp. - - - - 19,281,000 Cost 266,733 53,723 74,227 2,317 15,896,581 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. - - - - 1,599,000 Cost - - 65,582 5,961 1,218,036 40. Three Mile Creek, New Work: Mobile, AL Approp. - -40,000 - 340,000 17,385,000 Cost 98,207 54,909 6,039 392,126 17,381,352 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. - - - - 1,216,000 Cost 120,000 - 18,000 43,484 1,216,000 41. Tombigbee River New Work: (East Fork) Approp. - - - - 134,801 MS and AL Cost - - - - 134,801 Maint.: Appmp. 114,000 95,000 200,000 118,000 3,870,201 Cost 116,275 118,761 66,500 226,477 3,840,885 42. Tombigbee River New Work: Tributaries, Approp. 510,000 5,228,000 2,215,000 1,860,000 39,726,825 MS and AL Cost 4,281,847 4,950,043 1,982,458 804,567 38,132,070 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. - 255,000 183,000 - 872,700 Cost 29,215 274,980 96,756 82,765 547,968 43. Upper Gordon Creek New Work: Hattiesburg, MS Approp. 1,823,000 225,000 50,00 -50,000 3,865,000 Cost 1,817,149 247,722 14,166 10,348 3,829,147 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. - - - - 130,720 Cost -61 50 - - 130,689 44. Village Creek, New Work: Birmingham, AL Approp. - 295,000 372,000 20,000 22,894,000 Cost 423,611 258,930 140,690 45,863 22,860,239 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. - - 6,864 - 7,206,574 Cost 192,008 -9,849 5,996 - 7,203,102 45. Waveland Seawall New Work: Waveland, MS Approp. 336,000 - -4,000 -3,000 453,000 Cost 342,975 2,710 -1,693 - 453,000 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. 133,000 - 3,923 - 136,923 Cost 133,000 - 3,923 - 136,923 Multiple Purpose Power Projects 49. Allatoona Dam, New Work: Coosa River Basin, Approp. - - - - 35,709,08525 GA Cost - - - - 35,709,08525 Maint.: Approp. 6,173,000 5,441,857 5,458,465 5,357,500 124,504,346 Cost 5,895,074 5,703,727 5,312,654 5,549,977 124,312,719 50. Buford Dam, New Work: Lake Sidney Approp. - - - - 53,030,03828 Lanier, GA Cost - - - - 53,030,0382" Maint.: Approp. 8,783,000 7,154,858 6,942,415 6,297,000 154,563,295 Cost 8,545,555 7,437,967 6,687,110 6,506,257 154,316,415 Major Rehab. Approp. - - - 980,000 980,000 Cost - - - 711,615 711,615 51. Carters Dam and New Work: Reservoir, GA Apnr p. - - - - 111,140,340 Cos. - - - - 111,140,340 10-32 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 Sept. 30, 1998 Maint.: Approp. 4,585,000 5,250,857 4,451,100 4,532,790 79,124,731 Cost 4,614,226 5,305,994 4,446,504 4,544,616 79,001,736 52. Jim Woodruff Lock New Work: and Dam, GA and Approp. - - - - 47,978,8583 FL Cost - - - - 47,978,8583' Maint.: Approp. 6,001,000 4,595,000 6,570,414 7,075,000 111,755,711 Cost 5,627,012 4,832,076 6,661,034 6,614,769 111,037,108 Major Rehab. Approp. - 900,000 1,925,000 2,896,000 5,721,000 Cost - 846,798 1,633,345 1,004,297 3,484,439 53. Millers Ferry Lock New Work: and Dam, AL Approp. - - - - 63,125,300 Cost - - - - 63,125,300 Maint.: Approp. 3,172,000 4,126,857 7,901,440 6,184,350 78,381,858 Cost 3,101,776 4,176,137 7,958,569 6,182,153 78,276,782 54. Robert F. Henry New Work: Lock and Dam, AL Approp. - - - - 83,360,800 Cost - - - - 83,360,800 Maint.: Approp. 4,606,000 5,318,857 4,333,445 4,288,950 58,336,113 Cost 4,663,796 5,351,663 4,404,812 4,270,283 58,223,761 55. Walter F. George New Work: Lock and Dam, Approp. - - - - 88,330,66932 AL and GA Cost - - - - 88,330,66932 Maint.: Approp. 6,968,000 5,387,857 6,069,744 6,754,290 145,407,288 Cost 6,939,755 5,294,028 6,411,825 6,643,568 145,165,372 Major Rehab.: Approp. - - 473,000 1,880,000 12,971,000 Cost - - 314,884 904,004 11,836,888 56. West Point Lake, New Work: Chattahoochee River Approp. - - - - 131,565,76033 Basin, GA and AL Cost - - - - 131,565,76033 Maint.: Approp. 5,870,000 5,847,857 5,311,110 5,190,000 93,831,875 Cost 5,577,985 6,067,778 5,524,045 4,792,049 93,412,446 1. Includes $134,613 for previous projects and $28,500 for DPR on Two-Mile. 2. Includes $168,766 for previous projects. 3. Includes $5,650 for previous projects. 4. Cost for providing spoil dikes for work authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act. 5. Includes $44,382 for previous projects of which $5,000 was contributed funds. 6. Includes $96,509 for previous projects of which $10,200 was contributed funds. 7. Includes $606,931 for previous projects and $1,243,661 for recreational facilities on completed projects. 8. Includes $50,000 for previous projects. 9. Includes $45,605 for previous projects. 10. Includes $65,137 for previous projects. 11. Includes $269,017 for previous projects. 12. Includes $2,312,297 for previous projects and $442,836 Special O and M Funds. 13. Includes $6,683,104 for previous projects, $14,000 Public Work Funds, and $41,242 Emergency Relief funds. 14. Includes $4,096,681 for previous projects and $494,136 Special O and M funds. 15. Includes $203,560 for previous projects, $581,959 Public Works Funds, $457,467 rehabilitation of jetties under existing project and $48,001 for Grand Lagoon modification. 10-33 16. Includes $513,604 for previous projects. 17. Includes $904,442 for previous projects. 18. Includes $412,624 for previous projects, $124,565 Special O and M funds, and $829,472 Emergency Work Funds. 19. Includes $594,688 for previous projects. 20. Includes $126,649 for previous projects. 21. Includes $1,993,000 transferred to National Park Service; $210,249 GI funds expended during FY 1957 thru FY 1961. Previous project cost amounted to $197,651. 22. Includes $234,331 for previous projects. 23. Includes $3,692,483 for previous projects. 24. Includes $2,978,050 for previous projects. 25. Includes $3,347,489 for recreational facilities. 26. Includes $1,883,193 Federal funds, $1,924 contributed funds for previous projects; and $809,553 for Lazer Creek design and $301,310 for Rysco Channel. 27. Includes $2,246,233 for previous projects. 28. Includes $8,233,325 for recreational facilities. 29. Includes $84,014 for recreational facilities. 30. Included under maintenance for overall Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers projects. 31. Includes $1,515,822 for recreational facilities. 32. Includes $2,441,029 for recreational facilities. 33. Includes $35,045 for previous project costs. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 10-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1907 Jan. 21, 1927 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Nov. 21, 1963' Feb. 5, 1975' Aug. 11, 1983' Jul. 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 2, 1969' Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 28, 1990 Jul. 3, 1930 APALACHICOLA BAY, FL (See Section 2 of Text) Channel 18 feet deep through West Pass and Link Channels. Ten feet H. Doc. 422, 59th Cong., deep across the inner bar, and 9 feet deep through Bulkhead Shoals. Ist Sess. Modify project to provide for channel 10 feet deep from mouth of inner H. Doc. 106, 69th Cong., bar channel to Gulf via Link and West Pass Channels, and 10-foot Ist Sess. depth in Bulkhead Shoals Channel. At Eastpoint, Fl., a channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet H. Doc. 156, 82d Cong., long, parallel to shore, with connecting channel 6 feet deep, and 100 feet 1st Sess. wide to St. George Sound, and at Apalachicola, Fl., a small-boat basin 200 feet and 9 feet deep, with a connecting channel 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide through Scipio Creek to the Apalachicola River. Modify project to provide for a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from H. Doc. 557, 82d Cong., the 10-foot depth in Apalachicola Bay across St. George Island to within 2d Sess. 300 feet of the Gulf shore, thence increasing uniformly in width to 200 feet at shore and continuing at this width to the 10-foot depth in the Gulf, with two jetties extending from the dune line on St. George Island to the outer end of channel, and for abandonment of West Pass Channel upon completion of of channel through St. George Island. Modify improvement of Apalachicola Bay, Fl., authorized by River and Harbor Act of Sept. 3, 1954 to provide that the Secretary of the Army shall reimburse local interests for such approved work as they may have done based upon the reduction in the amount of material which will have to be removed to provide project dimensions at such time as Federal dredging of the channel is undertaken. A channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 1 mile long, parallel to DPR (Sec. 107) shore at Two Mile, Fl., with a 6-by 100-foot connecting channel to water of the same depth in Apalachicola Bay. A channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending from the eastern DPR (Sec. 107) end of the existing Two Mile channel and generally paralleling the shoreline for a distance of about 9,000 feet to intersect with the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway about 1,650 feet south of Gorrie Bridge at Apalachicola, and a breakwater built to elevation 4.0 feet above mean low water along the seaward side of the existing channel parallel to the shore at Two Mile. The total length of the breakwater of about 6,150 feet, includes two 860-foot legs paralleling the existing entrance channel. Modify Eastpoint project to include breakwaters with a DPR (Sec. 107) total length of 5,300 feet. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 4 of Text) Aquatic plant control for N.C., S.C., Ga., Fl., Al., Ms., H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., and La. 1st Sess. Research and planning costs to be borne by U.S. Public law 87-874 87th Cong. Provided for continued research. H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong., Ist Sess. Increased non-federal cost-sharing from 30% to 50%. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) BAYOU CODEN, AL (See Section 5 of Text) Channel 4 by 40 feet. H. Doc. 824, 77th Cong., Channel 8 by 60 feet to connect with Bayou La Batre 2d Sess. channel. DPR (Sec. 107) BAYOU LA BATRE, AL (See Section 6 of Text) A 12- by 100-foot channel from that depth in Mississippi Sound to a H. Doc. 327, 88th Cong., point about 2,800 feet south of the highway bridge, thence a channel 2d Sess. 12 by 75 feet to the bridge, an overall distance of about 33,500 feet. Deepen existing channel to 18 feet to the bridge; to 14 feet Water Resources above bridge, and into Snake Bayou at a depth of 12 feet. Development Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-640) BILOXI HARBOR, MS (See Section 7 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mississippi Sound H. Doc. 754, 69th Cong., west and north of Deer Island to deep water in Back Bay of Biloxi. 2d Sess. 10-34 TABLE 10-B (Continued) MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Jun. 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Nov. 7, 1966 Mar. 28, 1979' Aug. 15, 1985 Jul. 5, 1884 Mar. 3, 1899 Sep. 19, 1890 Sep. 19, 1890 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1909 Aug. 22, 1911 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 Work Authorized Relocation of channel. Entrance channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide into Old Fort Bayou. Entrance channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide through Cranes Neck into Bayou Bernard. Maintain channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide from Biloxi Harbor to Ott Bayou. Continuous channel 12 feet deep from Mississippi Sound the Air Force terminal on Bayou Bernard via Back Bay and Cranes Neck. A 23-mile-long through channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through: Mississippi Sound, Biloxi Bay (east of Deer Island), Back Bay, Big Lake, and via land cut to Gulfport Lake, including a 500 by 2,600-foot turning basin in the lake, thence, a channel 12 by 100 feet from the western end of Gulfport lake for about 2 miles to a 300- by 500- foot turning basin; adoption for maintenance of a 12- by 150-foot spur channel from the main channel in Biloxi Bay, westward about 1 mile to a 400- by 600-foot turning basin opposite Ott Bayou, and abandonment of the existing 6- by 40-foot channel into Ott Bayou; continuation of maintenance of the 12- by 150-foot lateral channel westward about 2.2 miles from the main channel in Biloxi Bay to a point opposite Oak Street; continuation of maintenance of the channel west of Deer Island. A channel 10 feet deep; 100 feet wide and 300 feet long extending northward from the Biloxi Lateral Channel and, into a rectangular basin approximately 300 feet by 370 feet. A channel 12-feet deep; 130-feet wide and 2,100-feet long, and a 300 by 300 foot turning basin also to a 12-foot depth. BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL (See Section 8 of Text) Original appropriation for improving Black Warrior River. Original project for slack-water improvement authorized by Secretary of War, Apr. 19, 1887 Construction of the first locks between Tuscaloosa and Demopolis. (Maintenance of the section of Tombigbee River below lock 1 to its mouth (66 miles) included in the existing project.) Construction of locks and dams, 1, 2, and 3. Merging of the individual project for the Black Warrior and Warrior Rivers and the Tombigbee River below Demopolis Construction of locks and dams 14, 15, 16, and 17. Provides for reconstruction of obsolete structures, modified in plan and location, to provide efficient and economical maintenance and operation. Lift of lock 17 changed to 63 feet, and construction of locks and dams 18 and 19 eliminated from the project. Extension of slack-water improvement on Sanders Ferry on Mulberry Fork and Nichols Shoal on Locust Fork. Raising of various dams 2 feet and raising the lock walls 2 feet at lock 1 to provide a minimum depth of 8 feet at low water, widening the channel to 150 feet where practicable. For snagging Mobile River from the mouth of Chickasaw Creek to the junction of the Alabama and Tombigbee Rivers. 10-35 Documents H. Doc. 639, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 258, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 326, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 256, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 271, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 513, 89th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) DPR (Sec. 107) Annual Report, 1887, pt. 2, p. 1302. H. Doc. 178, 56th Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1901, pt. 3, p. 1858 H. Doc. 165, 57th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report, 1902, p. 1293 Public Law 317 H. Doc. 72, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report, 1918, P. 876 H. Doc. 728, 71st Cong., 3d Sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Aug. 30, 1935 Increase channel dimensions to 9 by 200 feet; construct crest gates at lock and dam 17; add flashboards at all dams; Sunflower Bend Cutoff. Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 26, 1934 Dec. 22, 1944 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Dec. 21, 1982 Jul. 30, 1983 Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 18, 1986 Aug. 15, 1985 Nov. 17, 1986 May 16, 1963' Sep. 3, 1954 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Aug. 16, 1991 Construction of a lock and dam below Tuscaloosa to replace original locks and dams 10, 11, and 12. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers harbors. Recreation facilities. Construction of a lock and dam near Demopolis to replace existing dams 4, 5, 6, and 7. Provide increased spillway capacity at dam 1. Coffeeville Lock and Dam Wildlife Refuge. Provides for a wider navigation opening at the Franklin Ferry Bridge, Jefferson County, Al. Authorized to widen, as necessary for safe passage, the navigation opening of Franklin Ferry Bridge, Jefferson County, Al. Conduct a feasibility study of protection from erosion problems on the southern bank from river mile 253 to river mile 255. JACKSON PORT, AL (See Section 8A of Text) Construct a spur canal 9 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 1000 feet long in conjunction with the realignment project on the existing navigation proejct. (Jackson Port) OLIVER LOCK AND DAM (REPLACEMENT), AL (See Section 8B of Text) Construction and land acquisition for Oliver Lock Replacement Construction of a lock and dam to replace the William Bacon Oliver Lock and Dam. BON SECOUR RIVER, AL (See Section 9 of Text) A 10- by 100-foot channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Bon Secour Bay to mouth of Bon Secour River and extending up river to vicinity of Swift's Landing, thence 6 by 80 feet up river to a point 600 feet above Oak Landing, with two turning and maneuvering areas 150 feet wide and 1,100 and 1,200 feet long opposite Swift's Landing and ice loading dock. Overall length of improvement is about 4.7 miles. CARRABELLE HARBOR, FL (See Section 10 of Text) Entrance channel 27- by 200-foot, harbor channel 25- by 150-foot, turning basin 25- by 100-foot. DAUPHIN ISLAND BAY, AL (See Section 11 of Text) A channel 7 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay to an anchorage basin of same depth, about 7 acres in area, in marsh just north of Fort Gaines on Dauphin Island; a channel 4 feet deep and 40 feet wide from anchorage basin to Dauphin Island Bay; and a jetty and revetment to protect entrance channel; and (b) an anchorage basin 7 feet deep and 500 feet square at Dauphin Island Village, with an entrance channel of like depth, 100 feet wide and about 8,300 feet long, extending to 7-foot hydrographic contour in Mississippi Sound. Deepen existing 4-foot channel to 7-feet and 40-feet wide from anchorage basin to Dauphin Island Bay. Documents H. Doc. 56, 73d Cong., 1st Sess., and Rivers and Harbors and Committee Doc. 45 73d Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26. 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 276, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 382, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 50, 86th Cong., Ist Sess. Public Law 97, 377 Public Law 98-63 Water Resource Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1987 (P.L. 99-591) The Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1985 (P.L. 99-88) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 451, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 333, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 394, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) 10-36 TABLE 10-B (Continued) MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Provides 400 feet of stone protection along the shoreline near the pier and erosion protection for shoreline in the immediate vicinity of Fort Gaines. Jun. 23, 1993 DPR (Sec. 14) May 19, 1969' Jul. 3, 1930 Oct. 24, 1951 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 1, 1980 May 17, 1950 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 23, 1942 Jun. 17, 1943 MOBILE BAY, AL, TO NEW ORLEANS, LA A channel 300 feet wide and 10 feet from the 10 foot contour in Mobile Bay to the 10-foot contour in Mississippi Sound. A channel 100 feet wide and 9 feet deep from Lake Pontchartrain to Mississippi Sound. APALACHEE BAY, FL, TO NEW ORLEANS, LA A channel 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide at mean low water, except in the section between Mobile, Al., and New Orleans, La., where the width is to be 150 feet. Conditional acquisition of Gulf County Canal, Fl. and enlargement of the canal to 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 71st Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 341, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Public Law 675, 77th Cong., 2d Sess., and H. Doc. 96, 79th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 257, 76th Cong., 1st Sess., and Public Law 75, 78th Cong., 1st Sess. 10-37 DOG AND FOWL RIVERS, AL (See Section 12 of Text) To provide small craft navigation on west side of Mobile Bay. DPR (Sec. 107) EAST PASS CHANNEL FROM GULF OF MEXICO INTO CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY, FL (See Section 13 of Text) Maintenance of 6-foot channel by 100-foot channel from H. Doc. 209, 70th Congress Choctawhatchee Bay into Gulf. 1st Sess. Maintenance of 12-foot channel from Choctawhatchee Bay H. Doc. 470, 81st Cong., into Gulf, and maintenance of 6-foot channel into Old Pass Lagoon. 2d Sess. Construction of twin jetties. H. Doc. 194, 88th Cong., (Present project dimensions.) 2d Sess. Modifications to provide a channel length of approximately 3,800 Energy and Water Devfeet in lieu of 2,000 feet from the East Pass Channel into elopment Appropriation Old Pass Lagoon, with no changes in width and depth. FLY CREEK, FAIRHOPE, AL (See Section 14 of Text) A channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long H. Doc. 194, 81st Cong., from 6-foot depth in Mobile Bay to a turning basin of same 1st Sess. depth, 100 feet wide and 350 feet long, in Fly Creek. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL, AND MEXICAN BORDER (Mobile District) (See Section 15 of Text) APALACHICOLA RIVER TO ST. ANDREW BAY, FL A channel 5 feet deep at mean low water and 65 feet H. Doc. 670, 61st Cong., wide at the bottom. 2d Sess. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet Rivers and Harbors wide at the bottom. Committee Doc. 52. 72d Cong., 2d Sess. CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY TO WEST BAY, FL A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide H. Doc. 259, 72d Cong., at the bottom. 1st Sess. A channel 6 feet deep at mean low water, with no H. Doc. 565, 61st Cong., reference to width. 2d Sess. CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY TO PENSACOLA BAY, FL A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet Rivers and Harbors wide at the bottom. Committee Doc. 42, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. PENSACOLA BAY, FL, TO MOBILE BAY, AL A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet H. Doc. 42, 71st Cong., wide at the bottom. Ist Sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Nov. 7, 1966 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 23, 1930 Jun. 30, 1948 Jul. 3, 1958 Aug. 15, 1985 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 10-38 Construction of a movable span in the Georgia, Florida H. Doc. 442, 76th Cong., & Alabama R.R. bridge crossing the Ochlockonee River. 1st Sess. Abandonment and closure of original channel between Big Lagoon H. Doc. 325, 81st Cong., and Pensacola Bay and construction of a new channel to enter 1st Sess. the bay north of original entrance. Authorized enlargement of Gulf County Canal to 12 by Public Law 89-789, 89th 125 feet. Cong. 2d Sess. GULFPORT HARBOR, MS (See Section 16 of Text) A channel 19 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the anchorage basin at H. Doc. 120, 55th Cong., Ship Island to Gulfport, Ms., and an anchorage basin next to the 3d Sess. shore end 19 feet deep and not less than 2,640 feet by 1,320 feet in area. Combined Ship Island Pass with Gulfport Harbor project. Increased depth to 26 feet and width to 300 feet across Ship Island H. Doc. 2, 60th Cong., Bar and depth to 19 feet in channel from anchorage basin at 1st Sess. Ship Island to anchorage basin at Gulfport. Authorized relocation of channel across Ship Island Bar. Increased depth to 27 feet and width to 300 feet across Ship Island H. Doc. 692, 69th Cong., Bar, 26 feet deep and 220 feet wide through Ms. Sound and depth 2d Sess. of 26 feet in the anchorage basin at Gulfport. Increased depth of 32 feet and width to 30 feet across Ship Island H. Doc. 112, 81st Cong., Bar, 30 feet deep and 220 feet wide through Ms. Sound and a depth 1st Sess. of 30 feet in the anchorage basin at Gulfport. Maintenance of the existing commercial small-boat harbor and an S. Doc. 123, 84th Cong., approach channel 100 feet wide and 4,300 feet long, from deep 2d Sess. water in Ms. Sound to the small-boat basin, all at a depth of 8 feet. Modify the existing Ship Channel to 36 x 300 feet in Mississippi The Supplemental Sound, and 38 x 400 feet across the bar, with changes in the Appropriations channel alignment and the entrance to the anchorage basin for Act, 1985 (P.L. 99-88) safe and unrestricted navigation. Modification of FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act. Water Resources Dredged material from project shall be disposed of in open water Development Act in the Gulf of Mexico in accordance with all provisions of of 1986 Federal law. (P.L. 99-662) Modify of WRDA of 1986 and authorize Water Resources disposal of dredged material in open waters Development Act of the Gulf of Mexico; and by Thin-layer disposal of 1988 in Mississippi Sound under a demonstration program. (P.L. 100-676) MOBILE HARBOR, AL (See Section 17 of Text) For improvement of Threemile Creek by snagging from Rivers and Harbors Mobile River to the Industrial Canal. Committee Doc. 69, 74th Cong., Ist Sess. Adoption of existing channel through Garrows Bend from Choctaw H. Doc. 739, 79th Cong., Point in Arlington pier, 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide, with 2 2d Sess. turning basins. Adoption of the existing channel alongside Arlington pier from the of Garrows Bend Channel, 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide. A channel 25 feet deep and generally 500 feet wide in Mobile River from the highway bridge to the mouth of Chickasaw Creek, then 25 feet deep and 250 feet wide in Chickasaw Creek to a point about 400 feet below Shell Bayou. Enlarging Mobile Bay Channel to 42 by 600 feet. H. Doc. 74, 83d Congress, Enlarging Mobile Bay Channel to 40 by 400 feet. 1st Sess. Deepening Mobile River Channel below highway bridge to 40 feet over present widths, including existing turning basin and anchorage areas. Widening river channel opposite Mazagine Point to provide a 40- by 800- by 1,400-foot turning basin. The turning basin was further modified for maintenance by SAD letter of November 27, 1973 under authority contained in ER- 1130-2-307 to increase the turning basin's dimensions to 1000' by 1600'. TABLE 10-B (Continued) MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 26, 1970 (SR) Dec. 15, 1970 (HR) Aug. 15, 1985 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 Mar. 23, 1967' Jun. 14, 1972 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 4, 1915 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Closure of Garrows Bend Channel by construction and operation of an earth-filled causeway across said channel (work to be done by local interests). To provide a channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the main ship channel in Mobile Bay and extending northwesterly for about 5.3 miles to the shore of Mobile Bay including an anchorage and turning basin near the shoreline, thence a land-cut 40 feet deep, 300 feet wide and about 1.9 miles long to and including a trapezoidal turning basin 40 feet deep and approximately 42 acres, 40 feet deep; a barge channel 12- by 100-feet extending 6500-feet and terminating in a 300-foot by 300-foot terminal basin. Deepen and widen entrance channel over the bar to 57 by 700 feet, a distance of about 7.4 miles, deepen and widen Mobile Bay Channel from mouth of bay to south of Mobile River, 55 by 550 feet, a distance of about 27.0 miles, deepen and widen an additional 4.2 miles of Mobile Bay Channel to 55 by 650 feet, provide 55 foot deep anchorage area and turning basin in vicinity of Little Sand Island, and construct a 1710 acre disposal area adjacent to the Brookley Industrial Complex. Modification of FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act. Dredged material from project shall be disposed of in open water in the Gulf of Mexico in accordance with all provisions of Federal law. PANAMA CITY BEACHES, FL Shoreline protection to provide a ll0-foot wide beach with an artificial dune system and stabilization of vegetation. PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL (See Section 18 of Text) Channels 27 and 29 feet deep. Abandonment of project adopted by act of June 25, 1910. Maintenance of a channel in Watson Bayou 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in St. Andrew bay to the highway bridge. Channels 32 and 34 feet deep. A channel 8 by 100 feet in Grand Lagoon from St. Andrew Bay to a point about 2,400 feet east of State Highway 392. Bridge with branches to serve shore facilities which terminate at the bridge. Channels 38, 40, 42 feet deep. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS (See Section 19 of Text) Provides for through channel from the Gulf to mile 4 on Dog River 25 by 300 feet through Horn Island Pass, thence 22 by 225 feet across Mississippi Sound and up 150 feet in Pascagoula River above bridge, and up Dog River to mile 4, all subject to financial participation by local interests. Waived requirement for financial participation by local interests. Cutoff channel, 12 by 125 feet, from State Highway 63 bridge to mile 4 on Dog River, via Robertson and Bounds Lakes. Modification to provide for channel dimensions of 35 by 325 feet through Horn Island Pass, thence 30 by 275 feet across Mississippi Sound and up Pascagoula River to the railroad bridge, and a turning basin just below the bridge. Reimbursement of local interests for work done on Dog River cutoff ($44,000). H. Doc. 74, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. (Under provision of Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control) The Supplemental Appropriations Act. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) H. Doc. 33, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 555, 76th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 559, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 196, 92d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 682, 62d Cong., River and Harbor Committee Doc. 12, 63d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 188, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 98, 96th Cong., 10-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 14, 1960 H. Doc. 98, 86th Cong., Ist Sess. Jul. 14, 1967 Oct. 23, 1962 Jul. 11, 1983' Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 13, 1902 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 27, 1962 Modification to provide for maintenance of 12- by 125-foot channel to mile 6 on Dog River, and maintenance of 30-by 225-foot side channel from main ship channel in Mississippi Sound to the mouth of Bayou Casotte, thence 30 by 300 feet in Bayou Casotte to a turning basin of the same depth 1 mile above the mouth. Deepening the Horn Island Pass channel to 38 feet and deepening the main ship channel in Mississippi Sound, the river channel to the railroad bridge, and the turning basin all to 33 feet. Enlarging Horn Island Pass Channel to 40 by 350 feet provision of an impounding area adjacent to and east of channel 40 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 1,500 feet long, enlarging main channel in Mississippi Sound and river channel to railroad bridge to 38 by 350 feet, and deepening turning basin in river and Bayou Casotte channels and basin to 38 feet. Modification to provide for channel dimensions 12 by 80 feet extending abut 2,750 feet from deep waters in the Pascagoula River into Krebs Lake to a turning basin, thence, along the south bank of the lake a channel with dimensions of 10 x 60 feet terminating at a second turning basin, a distance of about 2,750 feet. The project was constructed by hydraulic dredging with the disposal placed in an upland diked area. Deepen and widen gulf entrance channel to 44 by 550 feet; widen Horn Island channel to 600 feet, relocating that channel about 500 feet westwardly; deepen Mississippi Sound portion to 42 feet; widen and deepen Bayou Casotte to 42 by 350 feet and construct turning basin. Disposal of all new work material in Gulf of Mexico. PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL (See Section 20 of Text) A channel 30 feet deep at mean low water and 500 feet wide from the Gulf of Mexico to the dock line at the east end of the city of Pensacola, and also provided that $150,000 may be used in constructing or purchasing a seagoing suction dredge. Modified the existing project for the present inner channels and the deepening of the entrance channel to 32 feet. Improvements of Bayou Chico. Maintenance of the entrance channel from the Gulf of Mexico to lower Pensacola Bay, a distance of about 5 miles to dimensions of 35 feet feet deep and 500 feet wide; maintenance of a channel along the south side of the aircraft carrier mooring basin, a distance of about 2.5 miles, to dimensions of 33 feet deep and 300 feet wide; a bay channel 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and about 2.1 miles long; parallel approach channels to opposite ends of the inner-harbor channel, about 1.3 and 1.4 miles in length, each 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and flared at the junctions with the inner-harbor channel; and deepening the existing 500-foot wide inner-harbor channel to a depth of 33 feet and lengthening it to 3,950 feet. PERDIDO PASS CHANNEL, AL (See Section 21 of Text) A 12- by 150-foot channel stabilized by twin rubblemount jetties, from the Gulf of Mexico into Perdido Pass, thence 9 by 100 feet into Perdido Bay with a spur channel of the same dimensions into Terry Cove. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL AND MS (See Section 22 of Text) A waterway connecting Tennessee and Tombigbee Rivers via East Fork of Tombigbee River, Mackeys and Yellow Creeks. Plan of improvement consists of three sections: river section, 9- by 300-foot channel for 149 miles between Demopolis and Amory, Ms; canal section, 12 by 300 feet for 10-40 Chief of Engineers Report dated Nov. 3, 1960. H. Doc. 560, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) H. Doc. 253, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 96, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 528, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 94, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 486, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 24, 1946 TABLE 10-B (Continued) MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents 46 miles from Amory to Bay Springs; divide section, 12 by 300 feet (except in the 27 mile-long divide cut in which bottom width be 280 feet) for 39 miles from Bay Springs through dividing ridge to Tennessee. Total lift of 341 feet to be accomplished by 10 locks. Total length of project is 234 miles. Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 8, 1995 Sep. 5, 1997 Sep. 9, 1998 Sep. 11, 1995 Jan. 15, 1998 Aug. 5, 1995 Jul. 14, 1995 Jun. 12, 1997 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Water Resource Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) DPR (Sec. 103) DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 205) TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WILDLIFE MITIGATION (See Section 22A of Text) Acquire from willing sellers in a timely manner at fair market value 88,000 acres of land for mitigation of wildlife losses resulting from construction and operation of the project for the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway. BAYVIEW COURT, BAY ST. LOUIS, MS (See Section 31 of Text) Provide a 700 linear-foot concrete block revetment for beach erosion protection. BLACK WARRIOR RIVER NORTHPORT LEVEE, AL (See Section 32 of Text) Provide flood protection for the city of Northport, Alabama from over bank flows from the Black Warrior River. CEDAR POINT SEAWALL, BAY ST. LOUIS, MS (See Section 33 of Text) Construction of a 1,500 foot concrete/sheetpile wall in front of existing concrete seawall. CHOCTAWHATCHEE/PEA RIVERS, AL (See Section 34 of Text) Install fourteen (14) combination rain and stream gages within Choctawhatchee and Pea River Basins. CHOCTAWHATCHEE AND PEA RIVERS ELBA AND GENEVA LEVEES, AL (See Section 34A of Text) Replacing or repairing culverts flap gates, installing sluice gates on inside of levee and clearing underbrush. HANCOCK COUNTY SEAWALL, HANCOCK CO, MS (See Section 35 of Text) Provide a 990-foot timber bulkhead, two (2) feet in front of an existing concrete seawall for shoreline protection. KING CREEK, TUPELO, MS (See Section 36 of Text) Provide riprap, sheet pile, and gabion slope and stream channel protection. SAINT LOUIS BAY, BAY ST. LOUIS, MS (See Section 37 of Text) Provide a 1,000 linear-foot concrete/sheetpile wall in front of an existing concrete seawall for beach erosion protection. OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS (See Section 38 of Text) Provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, and recreation. SOWASHEE CREEK, MERIDIAN, MS (See Section 39 of Text) Channel enlargement, and clearing and snagging over a reach of 10.5 miles. One railroad bridge and several highway roads and bridges and utilities will require modification for the channel improvement. Development of recreation facilities. THREEMILE CREEK, MOBILE, AL (See Section 40 of Text) Channel widening and deepening from about 2,000 feet downstream of Stone Street to a point about 6,300 feet upstream of Interstate 65 or a total distance of 5.6 miles. Development of recreational facilities. 10-41 DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 14) PDA (Sec. 14) H. Doc. 549, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 18, 1941 Jul. 23, 1958 Jul. 8, 1980 Oct. 13, 19882 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 28, 1990 Apr. 12, 1995 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 28, 1954 May 25, 1982 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 TOMBIGBEE RIVER (EAST FORK), MS AND AL (See Section 41 of Text) Provides for alleviation of floods from the Tombigbee River by clearing, snagging, and excavation of 13 cut-off channels, and other related channel improvements. TOMBIGBEE RIVER TRIBUTARIES, MS AND AL (See Section 42 of Text) Provides for improvement of 22 tributaries of Tombigbee River. Extends project limits on Twenty Mile Creek and eliminates local cooperation for this remedial work. UPPER GORDON CREEK, HATTIESBURG, MS (See Section 43 of Text) Real Estate acquisition of nine (9) residences; habitat mitigation and channel enlargement. VILLAGE CREEK, JEFFERSON COUNTY, BIRMINGHAM, AL (See Section 44 of Text) Basically nonstructural and includes evacuating 642 structures in six separate neighborhoods from floodplain; enlarge 2 miles of channel and relocate necessary facilities; Install flood warning devices. Authorized the Secretary to acquire private vacant lands within the definite project boundaries established in the Real Estate Design Memorandum as a nonstructural element of the project. WAVELAND SEAWALL, WAVELAND, MS (See Section 45 of Text) Provide a 1,008 linear-foot concrete/sheetpile wall segment, and a 500 linear-foot concrete/sheetpile wall in front of an existing concrete seawall. MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, AL AND GA (See Section 1 of Text) Provides for full development of Alabama-Coosa Rivers and tributaries for navigation, flood control, power, recreation, and other purposes. Authorized construction of Carters Lake, GA, Claiborne Lock and Dam, AL, Jones Bluff Lock and Dam, AL, and Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, AL. Suspended comprehensive plan to permit non-Federal interests to develop Coosa River by constructing series of dams. Designated change of name from Jones Bluff to Robert F Henry Lock and Dam. Modification to the plan for the Coosa River segment of the waterway between Montgomery and Gadsden, AL to carry out planning, engineering, and design in accordance with the Montgomery to Gadsden, Coosa River Channel, AL Design Memorandum No. 1, General Design, dated May 1982. ALLATOONA LAKE, COOSA RIVER BASIN, GA (See Section 49 of Text) Provides for dam and reservoir for flood control, regulation of stream flow for navigation, development of hydroelectric power and recreation. APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE AND FLINT RIVERS, AL, GA AND FL (See Section 3 of Text) Development of Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers for navigation, flood control, hydropower, and recreation. H. Doc. 342, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. 10-42 Special Report on Record in Oct. (P.L. 222) 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 167, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. Supplemental Appropriations and Recession Act DPR (Sec. 205) 1980 (P.L. 96-304) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-640) DPR (Sec. 14) H. Doc. 414, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 436, 83rd Cong. S.2034 97th Cong., 2d Sess. Water Resources Develoment Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Public Law 228, 77th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 674, 76 Cong., 3d Sess. Mar. 2, 1945 TABLE 10-B (Continued) MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 24, 1946 Modified general plan for full development of Apalachicola, H. Doc. 300, 80th Cong., Chattahoochee, and Flint River System and authorized 1st Sess. construction of Lake Sidney Lanier multipurpose reservoir. Dec. 22, 1944 Authorized recreation facilities. Jan. 27, 1981' Modified the existing project to provide for 9- foot deep by 100-foot wide DPR (Sec. 107) side channel into the Apalachicola River Industrial Park, Blountstown, Fl. APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT Nov. 17, 1986 Modified Rivers and Harbors Act of 1945 to restore and maintain access Water Resources to bendways and interconnecting waterways in the course of routinue Development Act maintenance dredging; and to acquire lands for and to construct, operate, of 1986 and maintain water-related public use and access facilities. (P.L. 99-662) LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA (See Section 50 of Text) Jul. 24, 1944 Provision of recreation facilities. GEORGE W. ANDREWS LOCK AND DAM, AL AND GA (See Section 3A of Text) Jul. 24, 1946 Construction of high dam at Walter F. George site H. Doc. 300, 80th Cong., and low dam at George W. Andrews site. 1st sess. Dec. 22, 1944 Provided recreation facilities. JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, GA AND FL (See Section 52 of Text) Dec. 22, 1944 Provided for recreation facilities. WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL AND GA (See Section 55 of Text) May 19, 1953 Authorized construction of high dam at Walter F. George H. Comm. on site and low dam at Columbia site. Public Works WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER BASIN, GA AND AL (See Section 56 of Text) Oct. 23, 1963 Authorized construction for flood control, power, recreation, fish H. Doc. 570, 87th Cong., and wildlife development, and streamflow regulation for 2d Sess. downstream navigation. 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 205 of Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1954, as amended. 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 14 of Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. 10-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 10-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1998 Full Report See Annual Operation Report For Construction Maintenance Blackwater River, FL 1981 $41,650 $330,433 Bluff Creek, MS' 1963 1,000 6,883 Cadet Bayou, MS 1984 87,921 1,461,915 Cahaba River, AL2 1894 45,000 Choctawhatchee River, FL and AL 1973 171,885 291,694 Escambia-Conecuh Rivers, AL and FL 1981 208,499 1,171,734 Holmes Creek, FL 1931 8,562 36,800 LaGrange Bayou, FL 1972 289,496 204,717 Leaf and Chickasawhay River, MS2 1919 23,090 42,676 Noxubee River, MS' 1902 47,528 14,472 Ochlockonee (Ochlockney) River, GA and FL' 2 1900 5,000 Old Town Creek' 2 1887 3,000 Oostanaula and Coosawattee River, GA' 2 1907 32,656 Panacea Harbor, FL 1979 122,383 106,446 Pascagoula River, MS 1956 15,000 179,535 Pass Christian Harbor, MS 1976 59,313 823,385 Port St. Joe Harbor, FL 1984 1,960,862 2,965,283 Removing Water Hyacinths 1984 - 1,100,471 St. Marks River, FL 1965 1,710,809 87,379 Tallapoosa River, AL2 1893 43,972 Tombigbee River at Columbus Port, MS 1988 500,500 Upper Chipola River, FL from Marianna to its' mouth' 2 1941 36,781 63,193 Wolf and Jordan Rivers, MS 1979 29,195 481,515 1. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong. 2. Uncompleted portion of project deauthorized by H. Doc. 96-157, 1st Session. TABLE 10-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT For Last Cost to September 30, 1998 Full Report See Annual Operation Report For Construction Maintenance 2 Harrison County, MS, shore protection' 1953 $1,133,000 Panama City Beaches, FL Underway 175,125 1. Completed. 2. Operation and maintenance is the responsibility of local interests. 10-44 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT Alabama River at Montgomery, AL' Armuchee Creek, GA Beaver Creek, Montezuma, GA Big Brown Creek, Prentiss Co., MS Biloxi River at Lorraine Road, Harrison County, MS Black Creek, Gadsden, AL Black Warrior River, U.S. Hwy. 11 Bridge, Fosters, AL Boggy Bayou, Valparaiso, FL Boligee Canal, Boligee, AL Burketts Creek, Amory, MS Chattahoochee River, Eufaula, AL Chickasaw Bogue Creek, U.S. Highway 43 Bridge, Linden, AL Clanton, AL Collinsville, AL County Line Road Bridge, Itawamba Co., MS County Road 55, Etowah Co., AL Cribbs Mill Creek, Tuscaloosa, AL Dauphin Island Shoreline, AL East End Dauphin Island, AL Eslava Creek, Mobile, AL Fort Toulouse, Wetumpka, AL Gadsden Water Treatment Plant, AL Goodfood Creek, Chickasaw Co., MS Gordons Creek, Hattiesburg, MS Gulf Breeze, Santa Rosa Co., FL Highway 39 Bridge, Gainesville, AL Hintonville Road Bridge, Perry Co., MS Houlka Creek, Chickasaw & Clay Counties, MS Houston School Rd. Bridge, Itawamba Co., MS Hurricane Creek, Prentiss Co., MS Interstate 59 Bridges, Fosters, AL Lake Douglas, Decatur County, GA Leaf and Bowie Rivers, Hattiesburg, MS Leaf River, County Road Bridge, Mahned, MS Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, AL Magby Creek, Columbus, MS Martin Creek, Prentiss County, MS Mill Creek, Dalton, GA Mill Creek, Sumrall, MS Mound State Park, Moundville, AL Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks, Brewton, AL Murder Creek, Brewton, AL Murder Creek, East Brewton, AL Noxubee River Relief Bridge, Shuqualak, MS Old Hwy. 82 Bridge, Columbus, MS Osborne Creek, Highway 362 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS Portersville Bay East, Mobile Co., AL Prattville, Autauga Creek, AL Proctor Creek, Atlanta, GA Pumpkinvine Creek, Emerson, GA Raccoon Creek, Baconton, GA Rome, Coosa River, GA Sewerline Protection, Valley, AL Silver Creek, Rome, GA Sope Creek, Marietta, GA Sowashee Creek, Meridian, MS Sun Creek, Okibbeha County, MS Tallabinella Creek, Chickasaw County, MS Tallahala Creek, Pascagoula River, MS Tallahalla Creek, Laurel, MS Tombigbee River Bridge #6, Monroe Co., MS Town Creek, Americus, GA Trim Cane Creek, Okibbeha County, MS Trussville, AL Twenty Mile Creek, Airport Road Bridge, Frankstown, MS West Point, Chattahoochee River, GA Whorton's Bend Road, Etowah Co., AL Wolf Creek, Highway 362 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS Wolf Creek, U.S. Highway 45 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS Yellow Jacket Creek, Hogansville, GA For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1965 1966 1958 1987 1985 1953 1986 1994 1987 1984 1988 1985 1964 1940 1992 1996 1994 1996 1996 1997 1994 1996 1988 1985 1991 1990 1991 1982 1988 1992 1987 1970 1990 1986 1991 1991 1988 1992 1994 1994 1980 1994 1986 1988 1987 1985 1996 1946 1994 1985 1994 1955 1989 1992 1990 1956 1984 1988 1988 1996 1996 1965 1984 1965 1986 1955 1991 1985 1986 1966 1. Engineering, design, supervision, and administration (no construction work has been done. Includes $17,000 for pre-authorization studies.) 2. Operation and maintenance is the responsibility of local interests. 10-45 TABLE 10-E. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1998 Operation Construction Maintenancez $144,194 115,547 149,815 137,500 132,174 125,389 181,500 147,200 178,600 1,366,454 206,600 121,718 274,024 71,119 116,800 242,348 1,848,327 352,479 318,580 4,732,721 368,000 360,000 91,500 802,026 147,432 71,000 268,691 238,219 59,300 52,803 155,200 164,998 1,585,000 231,618 144,047 156,508 78,500 474,065 157,340 789,000 190,974 1,215,000 903,474 119,500 143,936 250,000 490,750 649,280 870,000 85,029 385,300 384,550 180,937 604,719 1,538,555 142,637 55,569 81,000 3,945,757 641,058 331,323 340,409 145,519 141,334 215,860 599,637 448,956 114,753 154,641 330,734 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 10-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Project Bayou Galere, MS' Buttahatchee Creek, MS2 (Auth. P.L. 96-304) Coosa River Channel, Gadsden, AL to Rome, GA (Auth. 1945 Act) GIWW; Apalachicola Bay to St. Marks River, FL Lazer Creek Lake, GA Little Browns Creek, AL2 (Auth. P.L. 96-304) Lower Auchumpkee Creek, GA Noxubee River, MS 2 (Auth. P.L. 96-304) Pensacola Harbor Modification, FL Sipsey River, AL2 (Auth. P.L. 96-304) Tombigbee River, AL & MS2 (Auth. 1941 Act) Westfork, MS 2 (Auth. P.L. 96-304) Type Navigation Flood Control Navigation Navigation Hydroelectric power Flood Control Hydroelectric power Flood Control Navigation Flood Control Flood Control Flood Control Year of Last Date Year of Last Full Report 1946 1989 1955 1986 1986 1989 1986 1989 1986 1989 n/a 1989 1. H. Doc. 96-157 deauthorized uncompleted portions of certain projects as shown in Table 10-C. 2. Deauthorized tributaries of Tombigbee River improvements. TABLE 10-H NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Fiscal year Study Authority 1998 Costs Ocean Springs Harbor, MS 107 11,447 Ochlockonee Bay, Wakulla Co., FL 107 65 Old Pass Lagoon, Destin, FL 107 13,140 Section 107 Coordination Account 107 7,538 Total 32,190 10-46 Deauthorization Document H. Doc. 192, 94th Cong., 1st Sess., as amended. Public Law 99-662 99th Congress Public Law 99-662 99th Congress Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress Public Law 99-662 99th Congress Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress Public Law 99-662 99th Congress Public Law 99-662 99th Congress Public Law 99-662 99th Congress Public Law 99-662 99th Congress Public Law 99-662 99th Congress Date Deauthorized Aug. 5, 1977 Jul. 9, 1995 Aug. 18, 1996 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Jul. 9, 1995 Nov. 17, 1986 Jan. 1, 1990 Nov. 17, 1986 Jan. 1, 1990 Jan. 1, 1990 Jan. 1, 1990 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-J FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Study Big Escambia Creek, Escambia, AL Big Willis Creek, Ft. Payne, AL Elba Levee Major Rehab, AL Flint River, Albany, GA Greens Creek, Petal, MS Kinchafoone Creek, GA Laurel, MS Magbee Creek, Columbus, MS Mixons Creek, Lamar County, MS Sand Creek, Tupelo, MS Section 205 Coordination Account Calhoun Co. Highway 77, AL County Road 55, Etowah, AL Gulf of Mexico, Hwy 193, Mobile Co. Highway 59 Bridge, DeKalb Co. Leaf River Bridge, Green Co., MS Pensacola Bay, Shoreline Dr., Gulf Breeze, FL River Jourdan, Texas Flat Road River Road, Pascagoula River, MS Shades Creek Bridge, Homewood, AL Tombigbee River, Spring St. Section 14 Coordination Account Total 10-47 Authority 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 Fiscal year 1998 Costs 10,179 64,956 19,412 20,802 13,540 968 1,903 15,376 9,052 1,700 9,095 51,854 642 57,242 25,000 15,842 15,666 24,753 61,505 562 3,338 8,873 $432,260 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 10-K RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Project Shoals - Airborne Lidar Bathymetry Channel Condition Surveys on Florida projects Channel Condition Surveys on Alabama & Mississippi projects Project Condition Surveys, General Total TABLE 10-L Cost During Fiscal Year $2,400,000 163,040 129,808 12,402 $2,705,250 ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, AL AND GA DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED UNDER EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 1 of Text) Claiborne Millers Ferry Robert F. Henry Carters Allatoona Proposed Structures Lock and Dam Lock and Dam Lock and Dam Lake Dam3 Dam Miles above mouth of river 72.5' 133.0' 245.4' 26.82 47.84 Nearest town Claiborne, AL Camden, AL Benton, AL Carters, GA Cartersville, GA Distance (miles) 7 10 3 2 4 Greatest lock length available for full width (feet) 600 600 600 Width of lock chamber (feet) 84 84 84 Maximum lift (feet) 30 48 47 Elevation of normal pool surface (mean sea level) 35 80 125 1072 840 Depth over sills at low water (feet) 13 Upper 15 Upper 15 Lower 13 Lower 12 Character of foundation Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Kind of spillway Gated and Gated Gated Gated Gated Fixed Crest Height of dam (feet) 95.5 99.5 94 451 190 Type of construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Rock-fill Concrete Earth Core Total reservoir capacity (acre-feet) 96,360 331,800 234,200 472,800 670,050 Power development (kw) - 75,000 68,000 500,000 74,000 Percent complete 100 100 100 100 100 Cost to date:5 $27,997,450 $63,125,300 $83,360,800 $111,140,340 $35,709,085 I. Above mouth of Alabama River (river miles). 2. Above mouth of Coosawattee River (river miles). 3. Reregulation dam (Carters) 25.3 (river miles). 4. Above mouth of Etowah River (river miles). 5. Includes cost of added recreation facilities as shown in Table 1O0 A. 10-48 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-M APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, AL, GA, AND FL, LOCKS AND DAMS AND MULTIPLE-PURPOSE DEVELOPMENT INCLUDED IN EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 3 of Text) Existing Projects Jim George W. Walter F. Buford Dam Woodruff Andrews George Lake Lock Lock Lock West Point Sidney and Dam and Dam and Dam Lake Lanier Miles above mouth 107.6' 46.52 75.02 201.42 348.32 Nearest town Chattahoochee, FL Columbia, AL Ft. Gaines, GA West Point, GA Buford, GA Distance (miles) 1 1 2 2.8 5 Greatest lock length 450 450 450 - and available for full width (feet) Width of chamber (feet) 82 82 82 - Maximum lift (feet) 33 25 88 - Elevation of normal pool 77 102 190(Summer) 635(Summer) 1071(Summer) surface (msl) 185(Winter) 625(Winter) 1070(Winter) Depth over sills at low 14 13 13 - water (feet) Character of foundation Limestone Limestone Limestone Rock Rock Kind of spillway Fixed-gated Fixed-gated Gated Gated Fixed Height of dam (feet) 67 72 114 95 192 Type of construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Earth and Earth and Earth and Earth Total reservoir capacity 367,300 18,180 934,400 604,500 2,554,000 (acre-feet) Power-development 30,000 - 130,000 73,375 86,000 (kilowatts) Percent complete 100 100 100 100 100 100 Year opened to navigation 1954 1962 1963 - Cost to date:3 $50,459,0015 $13,038,427 $99,263,5534 $131,565,760 $53,030,038 1. Above mouth of Apalachicola River (river miles). 2. Above mouth of Chattahoochee River (river miles). 3. Includes cost of added recreational facilities as shown in Table 10-A. 4. Includes $333,198 cost of land for wildlife refuge and $10,932,884 for major rehabilitation. 5. Includes $2,480,143 for major rehabilitation. 10-49 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 10-N BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL (See Section 8 of Text) Armistead William John HoHis Coffeeville Demopolis Selden Bacon Oliver Holt Bankhead Lock Lock Lock Lock & Dam Lock Lock and Dam and Dam and Dam (Replacement) and Dam and Dam' Miles above Mobile2 116.7 213.2 261.1 337.7 347.0 365.5 Nearest town (Alabama) Coffeeville Demopolis Eutaw Tuscaloosa Tuscaloosa Tuscaloosa Distance (miles) 3 (within city) 6 15 (within city) 6 30 Lock: Grestest length available for full width (feet) 600 600 600 600 600 600 Width of chamber (feet) 110 110 110 110 110 110 Maximum lift (feet) 34 40 22 28 64 68 Depth over sills at low water (feet) 13.0 13.0 13.2 18.0 13.0 14.0 Character of foundation Rock Rock Sand, clay Hard shale Shale, Sandstone sandstone Kind of spillway Fixed-Gated Fixed Gated Fixed Gated Gated Type of construction Lock Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Dam Concrete Concrete Earth-Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Year completed 1965 1962 1962 1934 1969 1985 Year opened to navigation 1960 1954 1957 1991 1966 1975 Actual cost of lock and dam3 $21,597,264 $19,774,583 $13,295,553 $123,835,857 $28,100,000 $52,292,880 1. Single lift lock. 2. Navigation mileage from foot of Government Street, Mobile, Ala. 3. Excludes cost of adding recreation facilities. 4. Scheduled. 10-50 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-0 TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, ALABAMA AND MISSISSIPPI (See Section 21 of Text) Existing Projects Gainesville Aliceville Columbus Aberdeen Lock A Lock B Lock C Lock D Lock E Ba Lock Lock Lock Lock and and and and and Lo and Dam and Dam and Dam and Dam Spillway Spillway Spillway Spillway Spillway an Miles above mouth' 266 307 335 358 371 376 39 398 407 412 Nearest town Gainesville, AL Aliceville, AL Columbus, MS Aberdeen, MS Amory, MS Smithville, MS Fulton, MS Fulton, MS Belmont, MS Tup Greatest lock length 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 60( available for full width (feet) Width of Chamber (feet) 110 111100 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 Maximum lift (feet) 36 27 27 27 30 25 25 30 30 84 Elevation of normal 109 136 163 190 220 245 270 300 330 (Su pool surface (msl) (W Depth over sills at 15 15 15 15 15 18 18 18 18 18 low water (feet) Character of foundation Mooreville Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Gordo Form. Eutaw Form. Gordo Form. San Chalk Sand & Clay Sand & Clay Sand Lam. Sand Sand & Clay Clay Sand Clay and Kind of spillway Fixed & Fixed & Gated Gated Gated Gated Gated Gated Gated N/A Gated Gated Height of dam (feet) 56 57 57 57 46 48 53 52 44.5 103 Ty'pe of construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Con & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & E Total reservoir capacity 45,290 655 59,483 31,564 4,400 19,000 13,300 24,900 6,900 (Su (acre-feet) (Wi Percent complete 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Yearopenedto 1978 1979 1981 1984 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 198 navigation Estimated Cost $103,214,000 151,255,000 182,650,000 128,262,000 102,685,000 96,905,000 71,375,000 98,205,000 88,173,000 147 Cost to Date $100,010,600 143,190,800 174,620,500 112,620,200 92,190,500 93,106,700 62,197,000 89,610,800 76,917,700 130 1. Miles above Mobile, Alabama (Mile 0.00 is at Bankhead Tunnel on U.S. Highway 90). y Springs ck d Dam pelo, MS mmer) 414 inter) 409 dstone SShale 3 crete earth mmer) 180,000 nter) 143,000 5 ',000,000 ,398,000 10-51 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 10-P COMPLETED FLOOD INSURANCE STUDIES AND FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION REPORTS FOR FY 1988 THRU FY 19981 Date Federal Study Requesting Agency Completed Cost Flood Insurance Studies Greene County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Mar 88 18,550 Covington County, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 88 35,000 Pickens County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 88 50,000 Fulton County, GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May 88 180,000 Monroe County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jun 88 33,000 Colquitt County, GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Sep 88 48,000 Murray County, GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Sep 88 68,000 Coffee County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 89 48,500 Montgomery County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jul 89 175,000 Clayton County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Nov 89 250,000 Jefferson County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Sep 91 397,000 Calhoun County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 91 200,000 Fayette County, GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jan 93 264,000 Tupelo, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jun 94 157,965 Mobile, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Nov 94 254,531 Tuscaloosa, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jan 97 182,000 Dougherty Co., GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Feb 97 244,000 Meridian, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jan 96 119,000 Special Flood Hazard Information Dearmenville & Golden Springs, AL Anniston, AL Mar 88 9,000 Chickasawhay River, MS Quitman, MS Jun 89 19,000 Archusa Creek, MS Quitman, MS Jun 89 9,000 Leaf River, MS New Augusta, MS Sep 89 27,000 Shades Creek, AL Jefferson County, AL Sep 90 45,000 Turkey Creek, AL Jefferson County, AL Sep 91 7,000 Leaf River, MS Taylorsville, MS Sep 91 25,000 Oostanaula River, GA City of Rome, GA Jan 92 10,000 Coosa River, GA City of Rome, GA Jul 92 10,000 Big Wills Creek, AL Fort Payne, AL Aug 93 41,800 Dry Creek, AL Oneonta, AL Dec 93 25,000 Big Wills Creek, AL Valley Head, AL Nov 93 34,800 Coosa River, AL Wilsonville, AL May 95 35,000 Choctawhatchee River, FL Holmes County, FL Aug 95 3,000 Thompson Creek, MS Richton, MS Aug 96 44,000 Black Creek, MS Forrest Co., MS Aug 97 35,000 Leaf River, MS McLain, MS Sep 97 19,000 Tanyard Creek, AL Jasper, AL Oct 96 32,000 Cane Creek & Tribs, AL Oakman, AL May 97 45,000 Magby Creek, MS Lowndes Co., MS Apr 96 5,700 Coosa River Wetumpka, AL Sep98 24,000 Chickasawhay Shabuta, MS Sep98 62,000 1. For list of reports completed by Mobile District for FY 1965 thru FY 1974, see FY 1974 Annual Report, page 10-50; reports completed in FY 1975 see FY 1975 Annual Report, page 10-44; and for reports completed in FY 1976 and FY 1977, see FY 1977 Annual Report, page 10-46. See page 10-48 FY 1978 Annual Report for FY 1978 reports, and see page 10-43 FY 1984 Annual Report for FY 1979 through FY 1984 reports. 10-52 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT * District comprises a portion of Louisiana, embraced in drainage basins tributary to Mississippi River and Gulf of Mexico, except Mississippi River above mile 325.5 above Head of Passes (AHP), drainage area of Ouachita- Black River Basin, and small eastern and western portions of Louisiana tributary to Pearl River and Sabine River and Lake. The New Orleans District territory encompasses 30,000 square miles. It includes sections of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from Lake Borgne Light 29 at the mouth of Pearl River to Sabine River, and the Passes of the Mississippi River. It exercises jurisdiction over flood control work on Mississippi River from mile 325.5 AHP to Gulf of Mexico; Atchafalaya River; and in Atchafalaya Basin; and maintenance of project navigation channel of Mississippi River below mile 325.5 AHP, under supervision of President, Mississippi River Commission (MRC), and Division Engineer, Mississippi Valley Division. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page Flood Control (cont.) Page 1. Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock, LA ........................... 2. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, LA ..... 3. Mississippi River Ship Channel, Gulf to Baton Rouge, LA ............... 4. Port Fourchon, LA ................ 5. Navigation work under Special authorization .................... 6. Comite River, LA (Diversion) ........ 7. Grand Isle and vicinity, LA .......... 8. Lake Pontchartrain and vicinity, LA, (hurricane protection) .............. 9. Lake Pontchartrain Stormwater Discharge Project, LA .............. 10. Larose to Golden Meadow, LA (hurricane protection) .............. 11. Mermentau River, Grand Chenier, LA ... 12. New Orleans to Venice, LA (hurricane protection) .............. 13. Southeast Louisiana Urban Drainage Project ......................... 14. West Bank of the Mississippi River, Vicinity of New Orleans, LA ......... 11-2 11-2 11-3 11-3 11-4 11-4 11-5 11-5 11-6 11-6 11-7 11-7 11-8 11-8 15. Inspection of completed flood control projects ........................ 11-9 16. Flood control work under special authorization .................... 11-9 17. Protection of Navigation ............ 11-9 18. Catastrophic Disaster Preparedness Program ....................... 11-9 19. Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection, and Restoration Act ............... 11-9 Table 11-A Cost and Financial Statement ............... 11-13 Table 11-B Authorizing Legislation ...... 11-16 Table 11-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................. 11-21 Table 11-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects............ 11-24 Table 11-E Deauthorized Projects ....... 11-25 Table 11-F Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ....... 11-26 Table 11-G Environmental Work Under Special Authorization ....... 11-27 Table 11-H Active General Investigations ............ 11-28 11-1 Flood Control Tables REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 1. INNER HARBOR NAVIGATION CANAL LOCK, LA Location. The project is located within the city of New Orleans, Louisiana. It is a deep and shallow draft canal extending northward from the Mississippi River to Lake Pontchartrain. Existing project. The existing Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock, built in 1920 by the Port of New Orleans, has dimensions of 31.5 feet deep, 75 feet wide, and 640 feet long (usable length). It passes barge traffic between the Mississippi River and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and is a vital link in the nation's Inland Waterway System. Delays to the navigation traffic average about 11 hours, with 24-36 hour delays common. The average yearly tonnage through the lock is 24 million tons, 2/3 of which is coal, petroleum products, and crude petroleum. Other major commodities include metallic ores, industrial chemicals and non-metallic minerals. Two major vehiclur roadway bridges (Claiborne and St. Claude Avenues) and one railroad/roadway bridge (Florida Avenue) cross the canal in the vicinity of the existing lock. The Corps of Engineers bought the lock from the Port of New Orleans in 1985. Local cooperation. The cost sharing for the replacement lock is specified in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The costs of the new lock were apportioned between general cargo navigation and inland navigation. Costs assigned to inland navigation represent the NED Plan and are shared 50 percent from the Inland Waterway Trust Fund and 50 percent from regular Corps of Engineer's appropriations. Those costs assigned to general cargo navigation, which were determined not to be incrementally justified, will be the responsibility of the Port of New Orleans as they prefer a lock to accommodate deep draft traffic as well as shallow draft traffic. The NED Plan is a lock 22 feet deep by 110 feet wide by 900 feet long (usable length) and is estimated to cost $496,300,000. The Locally Preferred Plan is 36 feet deep by 110 feet wide by 1200 feet long (usable length) and is estimated to cost $568,000,000. Terminal facilities. Two container ship berths and one other ship wharf are located on the canal in the vicinity of the existing lock. Operations and results during the fiscal year. The final Evaluation Report for the Replacement Lock, including a Community Impact Mitigation Plan, was approved by HQUSACE in Feb. 1998. Detailed engineering and design for the replacement lock was initiated. Condition as of Sep 30. Initiation of construction was authorized in the FY 99 Appropriations Act. Three contracts, demolition of the Galvez St. wharf, a test pile program, and a short levee/I-wall segment are scheduled to be awarded in FY 99. Also an initial job training program will be started in FY 99 as part of the Community Impact Mitigation Plan. The Community Impact Mitigation Plan was specifically authorized to be a feature of this project in the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. 2. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET, LA Location. In State of Louisiana and the territorial waters of the United States and extends from existing Inner Harbor Navigation Canal at a point 7,500 feet north of existing IHNC lock and about 11,000 feet from Mississippi River, to a turning basin south of Michoud, LA, and then as a land and water cut from turning basin south of Michoud, LA, southeasterly to and along south shore of Lake Borgne and through marshes to and through Chandeleur Sound to 38-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico. (Refer to NOAA Coast Charts Nos. 11340, 11360, 11363, 11369, 11371, and 11373. Also see MRC 1989 (57th edition) folio of maps, Mississippi River-Cairo, IL, to Gulf of Mexico, LA.) Existing project. Provides for a seaway canal, 36 by 500 feet, extending 76 miles as a land and water cut from Michoud southeasterly to and along south shore of Lake Borgne, and across Chandeleur Sound to Chandeleur Island and increasing gradually to 38 by 600 feet in Gulf of Mexico, with protective jetties at entrance, a permanent retention dike through Chandeleur Sound, and a wing dike along islands as required. It also provides for an inner tidewater harbor consisting of 1,000- by 2,000-foot turning basin 36 feet deep at landward end of seaway canal, and a connecting channel 36 by 500 feet wide extending easterly along Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from turning basin, including construction of a suitable highway bridge with approaches to carry Louisiana State Highway 47 (formerly 61) over channel. Plan further provides for future construction of a channel and lock in the vicinity of the existing lock to furnish an additional connection between tidewater harbor and Mississippi River. (See "Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock, LA" for more details). 11-2 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 11-4 of FY 1986 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. A public facility on the waterway is the Public Bulk Terminal of New Orleans constructed by Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans, on left descending bank at Mile 63. Two container ship berths are in operation at the Industrial Canal end of the seaway. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor: The Final Evaluation Report was completed for the new lock and connecting channels feature. Two dredging contracts for removal of 3,500,000 cubic yards of material from the channel at a cost of $2,280,000 were completed in FY 1998. One contract to maintain south rock foreshore protection at a cost of $1,300,000, one contract to construct a northbank foreshore dike at a cost of $2,196,000, and one contract to begin repairs on the north jetty at a cost of $1,715,000 were completed in FY 98. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated March 1958. The channel unit is 90 percent complete and the shiplock unit is 0 percent complete. The total project is 75 percent complete. The channel was opened to navigation Jul. 25, 1963, and completed Jan. 20, 1968. Paris Road Bridge was opened to traffic Jul. 21, and completed Nov. 14, 1967. The foreshore protection, south bank, Chalmette Area, Station 367+00 to Station 1007+00 is complete. 3. MISSISSIPPI RIVER SHIP CHANNEL, GULF TO BATON ROUGE, LA Location. The project is located in the southeastern portion of Louisiana below Baton Rouge, and consists of the Mississippi River and its major outlet to the Gulf of Mexico, Southwest Pass. Existing project. Provides more efficient deep-draft navigation access to the New Orleans and Baton Rouge reaches of the Mississippi River via Southwest Pass by enlarging the existing channel to a project depth of 55 feet and enlarging the adjacent channel along the left descending bank in New Orleans Harbor to a 40-foot depth, a turning basin at Baton Rouge, and training works in the passes to reduce maintenance. Estimated cost of existing project (Oct. 1, 1998) is $171,000,000 Federal and $421,000,000 non-Federal. In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $1,200,000. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on pages 11-2 and 11-3 of the FY 92 Annual Report. A third supplement to the LCA addressing the Permanent Saltwater Intrusion Mitigation Plan was executed on May 28, 1993. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) between the Government and the State of Louisiana was executed on Sep. 3, 1993 which provides for the dredging of a 45-foot channel from Mile 181 AHP to Baton Rouge. Terminal facilities. See Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico, LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction is underway on the permanent mitigation plan. The permanent mitigation plan consists of the Government constructing an underwater sill, when needed, at Mile 64 AHP to prevent the intrusion of saltwater into water supplies of the metropolitan New Orleans area. The plan also provides for upgrading the Plaquemines Parish water distribution system to provide fresh water to water treatment plants impacted by increased saltwater intrusion caused by the deeper channel. The first five contracts for the improvement of Plaquemines Parish water distribution system have been completed and one is underway. A supplemental LCA for this work was executed on May 28, 1993. We have initiated work on the General Design Memorandum for the remaining authorized features of the project. This includes the deepening of the Mississippi River to 55 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to Baton Rouge. Condition as of Sep. 30. The 45-foot channel is completed from the Gulf to Baton Rouge. Construction of the permanent mitigation plan is underway. Work on the General Design Memorandum for the remaining authorized features is underway. 4. PORT FOURCHON, LA Location. Port Fourchon is located near the mouth of Bayou Lafourche in southern Louisiana. The port includes 3,600 acres and is located approximately three miles from the Gulf of Mexico. An authorized Federal 11-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 12 by 125-foot channel, which was completed in September 1960, is located along the same alignment as the Port Fourchon project. This channel was enlarged to 20 by 300 feet from the Gulf to the port by the Greater Lafourche Port Commission in 1968. In 1980, the Port Commission deepened the entrance channel to 30 feet and enlarged Pass Fourchon, a channel intersecting Bayou Lafourche at channel mile 2, to 20 by 300 feet. Existing project. The recommended plan provides for a channel 24 by 300 feet from the upstream end of the existing jetties to channel mile 3.4. A 26 by 300- foot channel will be constructed from the 26-foot contour in the Gulf of Mexico to the upstream end of the jetties. The channel will be dredged hydraulically. Material from the initial dredging of the interior reach and from the first maintenance will be placed in a pipeline canal, an oil well canal, and an open water impoundment area. Subsequent maintenance dredging material from this reach will be placed in the impoundment only. For both the initial dredging and future maintenance dredging from the jetty reach, material will be placed on the shoreline east and west of the jetties. All work is programmed. Local Cooperation. The local sponsor is the Greater Lafourche Port Commission. A Project Cooperation Agreement will be negotiated upon funding of the project. The local sponsor will enter into agreements with owners of facilities to accomplish the required relocations of utilities. The relocations can be accomplished under current State of the Louisiana permits at no cost to the local sponsor. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design continued and is estimated to be 35 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. Planning, engineering and design activities are scheduled to be completed in FY 99. Construction is scheduled to be initiated and completed in FY 00. 5. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). Preauthorization studies costs for FY 98 were East Fork Calcasieu Pass, LA $51,206, Taylor Point Cut for $9,589; Bayou Petit Caillou, LA for $73,059. Preconstruction Engineering and design work costs for the Bayou Dularge, LA, project were $21,766. Flood Control 6. COMITE RIVER (DIVERSION), LA Location. In East Baton Rouge Parish, LA, between the Comite River and the Profit Island Chute of the Mississippi River, north of the town of Baker, LA, and south of the town of Zachary, LA. Existing project. The project will provide protection for residents of the Comite River Basin by reducing stages in the river below the diversion point for events up to the 100-year flood event,and containing within banks events up to the 10-year flood event. The authorized project consists of construction of an eight-mile diversion channel from the Comite River to an outfall into Lilly Bayou, and then a four-mile diversion along Lilly and Cooper Bayous to the Profit Island Chute of the Mississippi River. The project also includes a diversion structure in the new channel near the diversion point, a stage control structure and an outfall structure near and at the outfall into Lilly Bayou, and four control structures at the intersections of Whites, Cypress and Baton Rouge Bayous, the fourth near McHugh Road. A levee will be constructed of disposed material on the lower south bank of the new channel to assure against induced flooding on the south side, and clearing and snagging of White, Cypress and Baton Rouge Bayous north of the diversion channel. Mitigation for the project includes the planting of trees on cleared land near the diversion point and on portions of the disposal area, the protection and management of existing forested lands near the diversion point. Upgrading two gauging stations and installing six new gauging stations to assist in flood prediction is also included in the project. The current approved cost of the project is $141,200,000, including $ 82,700,000 Federal cost and $58,500,000 non-Federal cost. Local Cooperation. The cost sharing provisions contained in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 require that local interests shall: (a) Provide to the Federal Government all lands, easements, rightsof- way, and dredged material disposal areas, and perform the necessary relocations required for construction, operation, and maintenance of the project (Current estimate is $51,425,000); and (b) Provide to the Federal Government a cash contribution equal to 5 percent of the total cost of the project, excluding cultural resources (Current estimate is $7,048,000). 11-4 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT The total cost of items (a) and (b) mentioned above is limited to 50 percent of the total cost of the project. Upon completion of the Feasibility Study, the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development signed a letter of intent to sponsor the project. Operations and results during the fiscal year. In FY 98 Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) efforts continued and a value engineering study of the overall project was initiated. Condition as of Sep. 30. The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 reauthorized the project. The Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1998 provided $1,000,000 for construction of the project. Work on the initial set of plans and specifications is proceeding, as well as the negotiations for a Project Cooperation Agreement. Flood Control 7. GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LA Location. In south Jefferson Parish, LA, along the Gulf of Mexico, about 50 miles south of New Orleans and 45 miles northwest of Southwest Pass (Mississippi River). Existing project. The project provides protection from waves driven by hurricanes that have a frequency of recurrence of up to once in every 50 years. The plan consists of a berm and vegetated dune extending the length of Grand Isle's gulf shore and a jetty to stabilize the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. The dune has a 10-foot-wide crown at an elevation of 11.5 feet NGVD, 1 on 5 side slopes, and protective vegetation. The sandfill berm slopes from an elevation of 8.5 feet NGVD at the toe of the dune 180 feet gulfward to an elevation of 3 feet NGVD and, from this point, assumes its natural slope to the offshore bottom. The jetty provided by the plan has a top width of 6 feet at an elevation of 4 feet mean sea level, 1 on 2 side slopes, and extends approximately 3,600 feet along the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. Estimated cost of project (October 1991) is $20,933,000 Federal and $12,567,000 non-Federal, including $7,157,484 contributed funds. The repair and restoration of Grand Isle were accomplished by two separate contracts. The jetty extensions and sand bar removal contract (partial fix), was completed in early 1988. The dune repair and structural reinforcement contract was physically completed Sep. 4, 1991. An O&M Manual has been approved. The project has been turned over to the State of Louisiana for operation and maintenance. The 1992 Dire Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act provided funds to repair damage to the wave berm and dune caused by Hurricane Andrew and to add offshore breakwaters to the project as an integral part of the repair. The original plan was to construct 27 breakwater segments; however, only 23 breakwater segments were constructed due to limited funds. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 11-4 of the FY 92 Annual Report. An additional $4,750,000 was deposited in escrow to complete restoration of the dune which was completed on Sep. 4, 1991. Condition as of Sep. 30. The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 authorized construction of $17 million of additional improvements to the project subject to approval of a report justifying the improvements. Work has begun on preparation of the report. The project is in a deteriorated condition as a result of storm damage and the lack of maintenance. 8. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN AND VICINITY, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. In southeastern Louisiana, vicinity of New Orleans, in St. Charles, Jefferson, Orleans, St. Bernard, and St. Tammany Parishes, comprising lower land and water area between the Mississippi River alluvial ridge and the Pleistocene escarpment to north and west. The dominant topographic feature is Lake Pontchartrain, a shallow tidal basin, about 640 square miles in area and averaging 12 feet deep, connecting with lesser Lake Maurepas to the west and through Lake Borgne and Mississippi Sound to the Gulf to the east. The lake drains about 4,700 square miles of tributary area. (Refer to Geological Survey quadrangles Yscloskey and Malheureaux Point, Drum Bay, Door Point, Lake Eugenie, Oak Mound Bayou, Mitchell Keys, Lake Eloi, and Morgan Harbor; Engineer quadrangles Slidell, Covington, Ponchatoula, Springfield, Denham Springs, Donaldsonville, Mt. Airy, Bonnet Carre', Spanish Fort, Chef Menteur, Rigolets, St. Bernard, New Orleans, and Hahnville; and Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1115 and 1116. Existing project. Provides protection to the greater New Orleans area and other communities bordering Lake Pontchartrain from the effects of 11-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 hurricane-generated floods. The project is comprised of two major features: The Chalmette Area Plan and the High Level Plan. The Chalmette Area Plan consists of a levee and floodwall system around the Chalmette area and along the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, with connections to the Mississippi River levees. The High Level Plan provides for heightening and strengthening the existing hurricane protection levee systems in Orleans Parish and the east bank of Jefferson Parish, repairing and rehabilitating the Mandeville Seawall in St. Tammany Parish; building a new mainline hurricane levee on the east bank of the St. Charles Parish just north of U.S. Highway 61 (Airline Highway); raising and strengthening the existing levee which extends along the Jefferson- St. Charles Parish boundary between Lake Pontchartrain and Airline Highway; and deferring construction of the proposed Seabrook lock until its feasibility as a feature of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet navigation project can be determined. Areas which will be enclosed by the levee and floodwall construction will be provided protection against tidal surge resulting from the Standard Project Hurricane (SPH). The estimated project cost for work (October 1998) is $520,000,000 Federal and $219,000,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 11-5 of the FY 92 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preparation of design memorandums and plans and specifications continued by hired labor, Architect-Engineer Contractors, and the local sponsors. A change from the original Barrier Plan to the current high level plan was approved in February 1985 by the Office, Chief of Engineers. A draft mitigation report with corresponding EIS was prepared and distributed for public review on Mar. 16, 1988, and subsequently approved. The Louisiana Department of Natural Resources agreed to fund the Local Sponsor's share of mitigation and a mitigation dike was constructed in FY 97. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction started May 1967 and is 86 percent complete. In FY 99, we will initiate award of ten construction contracts, continue eight ongoing construction contract, and complete five construction contracts. In FY 00, we will initiate award of five construction contracts, and complete twelve construction contracts. 9. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN STORMWATER DISCHARGE PROJECT Location. The project is located on the east bank of the Mississippi River in Jefferson Parish, near New Orleans, Louisiana. Project Description. The project encompasses the design, construction, construction management, and monitoring of improvements to demonstrate a process that will reduce the impacts of stormwater discharges from Jefferson Parish on the water quality of Lake Pontchartrain. Features include: a 20,000 gpm stormwater pump station, sewer force main from the stormwater pump station to the existing Parish wastewater treatment plant, and modifications to the treatment plant. Local Cooperation. The project requires that the local sponsor provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and disposal areas (LERRD's) needed for project construction. The total of the local share must be a minimum of twenty-five percent of the project total, but not exceed fifty percent. Design and construction of modifications or additions to the Sponsor's facilities will be conducted by the facility owner under technical oversight by the Corps of Engineers. Section 307(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 provides for reimbursement to the Local Sponsor for work compatible with project requirements. Condition as of Sep. 30. Local interests are continuing design efforts, construction activities, and initiating preconstruction water quality monitoring activities. In FY 98, the final two contracts for construction of project features were awarded, and project management, technical oversight and construction activities on the first two contracts continued. 10. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. In coastal section of Louisiana, along Bayou Lafourche, and includes lands on both banks of the bayou from Larose to 2 miles south of Golden Meadow. (Refer to Geological Survey quadrangles Cutoff, Lake Felicity, Bay Dosgris, Golden Meadow Farms, Bay Tambour, Mink Bayou, Caminada Pass, Leeville, Belle Pass, Pelican Pass, and Calumet Island; Engineer quadrangles New Orleans, Hahnville, Point a la Hache, Barataria, and Fort Livingston; and Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1115 and 1116.) 11-6 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT Existing project. Provides a loop levee about 40 miles long along both banks of Bayou Lafourche from Larose to South Golden Meadow; enlargement of 3 miles of existing levee at Golden Meadow; floodgates for navigation and hurricane protection in Bayou Lafourche at upper and lower bayou crossings; about 8 miles of low interior levees to regulate intercepted drainage. Estimated cost for new work (October 1997) is $80,000,000 Federal and $34,000,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 11-6 of the FY 92 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. One 3rd Lift contract was substantially completed in FY 98. Condition as of Sep. 30. In FY 99, one 2nd lift contract will be initiated. In FY 00, one contract will be completed and one contract awarded. Construction commenced in February 1972 and is 87 percent complete. 11. MERMENTAU RIVER, GRAND CHENIER, LA Location. Along the right descending bank of the Mermentau River near the town of Grand Chenier, Sections 3 and 4, Township 15 South, Range 6 West, Cameron Parish, Louisiana. Existing project. The authorized project consists of construction of approximately 2,000 feet of rock dike parallel to Parish Road 218 about 15 feet riverside of the road centerline. Fill material would be placed between the existing roadway tow and the newly constructed dike to replace the eroded shoreline. Both fill and stone material would be imported to the site. Local Cooperation. Local cooperation for this project is being supplied in accordance with the provisions of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. This act requires that the local interest shall: (a) Provide to the Government all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas, and perform the necessary relocations required for construction, operation and maintenance of the project (current estimate is $0); (b) Bear 25 percent of the first cost of the project (12.5 percent up front, 12.5 percent after completion, or repaid over 30 years). The Cameron Parish Police Jury has signed the Project Cooperation Agreement and is the local sponsor for this project. Operations and results during the fiscal year. In FY 96 construction was completed on this project. Condition as of Sep. 30. Final costs are $298,800 Federal and $89,000 non-Federal. 12. NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION Location. Includes land subject to inundation by hurricane tides extending along both banks of the Mississippi River below New Orleans from vicinity of Phoenix to Venice, LA. Existing project. Provides for improvements along Mississippi River below New Orleans, LA, for prevention of hurricane tidal flood damages by increasing heights of existing back levees and modifying existing drainage facilities where necessary in three separate reaches: Reach A, on the west bank from St. Jude to Tropical Bend, 18 miles, 4,340 acres protected; Reach B, on the west bank from Tropical Bend to Venice, 21 miles, 4,900 acres protected; and Reach C, on the east bank from Phoenix to Bohemia 16 miles, 5,470 acres protected, and raising the river levee on the west bank (MR&T levee) from St. Jude to Venice, to a grade high enough to prevent overtopping by tidal surges from the east, generally called the West Bank River Plan. Reach B was later divided into two units, Reach B-1 from Tropical Bend to Fort Jackson and Reach B-2 from Fort Jackson to Venice, LA, as a result of a request made by the local agency. Estimated cost of new work (October 1998) is $171,000,000 Federal and $73,000,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way including borrow areas and spoil disposal areas necessary for the construction of the project, at costs presently estimated at $9,342,000; accomplish all necessary alterations and relocations to roads, pipelines, cables, wharves, and other facilities required by the construction of the project at costs presently estimated at $6,191,000; bear 30 percent of the first cost, a sum presently estimated at $73,000,000, and cash contribution or equivalent work presently estimated at $57,467,000 to be paid either in a lump sum prior to initiation of construction or in installments prior to start of pertinent work items. The local sponsor has requested that an area extending from the upstream limits of Reach A at City 11-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Price to St. Jude, Louisiana be incorporated into the project. This work involves upgrading 3.3 miles of existing non-Federal levees to project standards. The local sponsor has elected to pay all of the costs of this reach of levee. While the sponsor will not receive credit for these costs, the increased protected area is eligible for Federally subsidized flood insurance. Savings to the project achieved by a portion of levee no longer being required at the upstream end of Reach A, is creditable to the local sponsor. A Post Authorization Change report was prepared for this reach and was approved by the Lower Mississippi Valley Division on Mar. 6, 1992. Supplemental assurances for the City Price to St. Jude reach were accepted on Feb. 18, 1993. Assuring Agency: Plaquemines Parish Government. Assurances for all reaches of the project have been furnished. Requirements are described in full on page 11-7 of the FY 92 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction during FY 98 was initiated on one contract, and completion of two others, and continuation of another contract. A second enlargement construction contract is scheduled for award in FY 99. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction began on the project in September 1968 and the total project is approximately 73 percent complete. 13. SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA URBAN DRAINAGE PROJECT (FLOOD CONTROL) Location. The authorized project is located in Orleans, Jefferson and St. Tammany Parishes. Features in Orleans Parish (city of New Orleans) are located on the east bank of the Mississippi River. Work in Jefferson Parish is located on the east and west banks of the Mississippi River in the vicinity of New Orleans, LA. St. Tammany Parish features are located in the southern portion of the parish, near Lake Pontchartrain, in and around the communities of Slidell, Mandeville, Madisonville, Abita Springs, and Lacomb, LA. Project Features. The work in Orleans Parish consists of enlargement of a major pumping station and work on two other stations; and improvements to about seven drainage canals and underground drainage lines. Jefferson Parish features include improvements to five pumping stations and almost thirty drainage canals. Work in St. Tammany includes: channel improvements, retention ponds, levees, and structure raising. Local Cooperation. The project requires that the local sponsor(s) provide all lands, easements, rights-ofway, relocations, and disposal areas (LERRDs) needed for project construction, as well as a minimum five percent cash contribution. The total (value) of the locals share must be a minimum of twenty-five percent of the project total, but not exceed fifty percent of the project total. Jefferson Parish and the Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans executed the Project Costsharing Agreements (PCAs) in January 1997. Operations and results during fiscal year. Local interests in Jefferson and Orleans parishes continued (and in some instances, completed) some of the design and construction of features authorized in the project, for which they will get credit. Architect-Engineer contractors, working for both the Corps and the parishes, are doing most of the design work. Federal construction began in March 1997. Three Post Authorization Change reports (two Orleans Parish, one Jefferson Parish) were initiated in FY 98 and one in Jefferson is scheduled to be initiated in FY 99. These reports are required to justify additional improvements to Orleans and Jefferson primary drainage systems. Condition as of Sep. 30. Nine Federal contracts were awarded in FY 98 with thirty-one scheduled for FY 99. 14. WEST BANK, OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER, VICINITY OF NEW ORLEANS, LA Location. The project is located in Jefferson, Orleans and Plaquemines parishes on the West Bank of the Mississippi River in the vicinity of New Orleans, Louisiana. The project area generally extends from the Jefferson-St. Charles Parish line to the community of Oakville in Plaquemines Parish and is bounded by the Mississippi River on the north and east and Lakes Cataouatche and Salvador and the GIWW on the south and west. The originial project was from Westwego to Harvey but has been expanded to include the area east of Harvey and also the Lake Cataouatche area. These two areas were authorized by WRDA 96. Existing project. The total project consists of about 55 miles of new and enlarged earthen levee, 6 miles of 11-8 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT floodwall, a navigable floodgate in the Harvey Canal below Lapalco Boulevard, a discharge channel and 1,000 cfs capacity increase at the Cousins Pump Station. The protection is designed to protect against tidal floodwaters resulting from the Standard Project Hurricane (SPH). The SPH has a frequency of recurrence of one in 500 years. The elevation of the SPH protection varies from 9 feet NGVD to 10.5 feet NGVD. The project plan includes mitigation which consists of the construction of a timber pile and tire breakwater on the west bank of Lake Cataoutache adjacent to the Salvador Wildlife Management Area and the acquisition of approximately 1,300 acres of forested wetlands which will be managed to improve habitat quality. The estimated project cost (October 1998) is $294,000,000. ($192,000,000 Federal and $102,100,000 non-Federal). Local Cooperation. Local cooperation is being supplied in accordance with the provisions of WRDA 86 and WRDA 96. Local interests are required to accomplish all necessary relocations to roads, railroads, pipelines, cables, wharves, and other facilities required by the construction of the project. For the Westwego area, locals must bear 35 percent of the first cost of construction. Funds provided by non-Federal interests for interim hurricane protection may be considered beneficial expenditures and may be credited as part of the non-Federal contribution of the project pursuant to the WRDA of 1986. For the area East of Harvey, local interests are required to bear 34.75 percent of the first cost of construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. The New Westwego to Orleans Village Levee (1st Lift) was completed in FY 98 and the Orleans Village Hwy 45 Levee (1st Lift) contract is continuing with completion scheduled for FY 99. Three new contracts are scheduled for FY 99. In addition, engineering and design is underway for the East of Harvey and for Lake Cataouatche areas. Construction contracts for the Segnette State Park Floodwall and the Hero Canal Levee are scheduled for award in FY 99. Conditions as of September 30. Project construction began in February 1991. The project is currently scheduled for completion in 2013. 15. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Various hurricane protection projects, as well as small flood control projects, were inspected during FY 1998. Also, periodic inspection and continuing evaluation of completed civil works structures was conducted in accordance with ER 1110-2-100, at various times during the year on an as needed basis. Fiscal year costs for the period were $295,116. Total costs to Sep. 30, 1998 were $5,247,870. 16. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Disaster preparedness, fiscal year costs for the period were $305,767. Emergency activities for Hurricanes in FY 98 were $36,975. Rehabilitation investigation costs through FY 98 were $4,334 for the Grand Isle Hurricane Protection project. See Table 11-F 17. PROTECTION OF NAVIGATION During FY 98, operation and maintenance costs were $40,186 on Project Condition Surveys and $3,685,076 for Waterborne Commerce Statistics. 18. CATASTROPHIC DISASTER PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM During FY 98, operation and maintenance costs were $22,071 on Local Preparedness; $126,559 on National Preparedness; and $18,295 on National Emergency Facilities. Total costs for FY 98 were $166,925. 19. COASTAL WETLANDS PLANNING, PROTECTION AND RESTORATION ACT (TITLE III OF PUBLIC LAW 101-646, DATED NOV. 29, 1990) Location. The coastal parishes of Louisiana. Authority. Activities were authorized by the Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection and Restoration Act (CWPPRA) (Title III of Public Law 101-646, dated Nov. 29, 1990), which established the Louisiana Coastal 11-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Wetlands Conservation and Restoration Task Force. The Task Force consists of the Secretary of the Army (chairman); the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency; the Governor of the State of Louisiana; the Secretary of the Interior; the Secretary of Agriculture; and the Secretary of Commerce. Local Cooperation. The conditions of local cooperation are established by this act. Condition of Sep. 30. The first Priority List (PPL) was approved by the Task Force on Oct. 31, 1991. Seventeen projects were named on the list; three of these were deauthorized due to unforeseen implementation problems. Funds in the amount of $38.6 million ($28.1 million Federal, $10.5 million State) were made available for construction of these projects. The Task Force has given final approval for construction for 13 of the 14 projects. Of the 14 projects, construction has been completed on 11: West Hackberry Vegetative Plantings Demo, March 94; Bayou Labranche Wetlands Restoration, April 94; Cameron Prairie Refuge Shoreline Protection, August 94; Sabine Wildlife Refuge Erosion Protection, March 95; Vermilion River Cutoff Bank Protection, February 96; Lake Salvador Shoreline Protection at Jean Lafitte, March 96; Bayou Sauvage #1, May 96; Timbalier Vegetative Plantings Demo, July 96; Falgout Canal Vegetative Plantings Demo, December 96; and Cameron-Creole Watershed Hydrologic Restoration, January 97; and Isles Dernieres (Phase 0), October 98. Two projects are under construction: GIWW to Clovelly Wetland Restoration and Barataria Bay Waterway Marsh Creation. Additionally, one of the deauthorized projects, Dewitt/Rollover Vegetative Plantings Demo was completed in August 94. The 2nd PPL was approved by the Task Force on Oct. 19, 1992. Fifteen projects were named on the list. Additional funds in the amount of $38.4 million ($28.2 million Federal, $10.2 million State) were made available for construction of these projects. Engineering and design on several of the projects has been completed, and the Task Force has given final approval for construction for 13 of the 15 remaining projects. Of the 15 remaining projects, construction has been completed on 10: Vermilion Bay/Boston Canal, November 95; Mud Lake, June 96; Clear Marais Bank Protection, March 97; Point Au Fer, May 97; Bayou Sauvage #2, May 97; Atchafalaya Sediment Delivery, Mar 98; West Belle Pass Headland Restoration, July 98; Freshwater Bayou, Aug 98; Big Island Mining, Oct 98; and Isles Dernieres (Phase 1), October 98. One project, Jonathan Davis, is under construction. The 3rd PPL was approved by the Task Force on Oct. 1, 1993. Nineteen projects were named; four of these were deauthorized due to unforeseen implementation problems; with two projects in a deferred status, to be constructed if prior projects were found to be implementable. Additional funds in the amount of $40.1 million ($29.9 million Federal, $10.2 million State) were made available for construction of these projects. Engineering and design of several of the projects has been completed, and the Task Force has given final approval for construction for 12 of the 13 remaining projects. Of the 13 remaining projects, construction has been completed on one project; Lake Salvador Shore Protection, Jun 98; Channel Armor Gap Crevasse, Nov 97; Cameron Creole Maintenance, Jul 98; Whiskey Island, Aug 98; and Cote Blanche, Dec 98. Two projects are under construction: Red Mud Demo, and Lake Chapeau. Additionally, one of the deauthorized projects, South West Shore White Lake Demo, was completed in July 1996. The 4th PPL was approved by the Task Force on Dec. 16, 1994. Seventeen projects were named on the list. Additional funds in the amount of $35.0 million (30.0 million Federal, $5.0 million State) were made available for construction of these projects. Due to the reduction in State's funding capability, only 10 projects were selected for cost-sharing; two of these were deauthorized. Engineering and design on several of the projects has been completed, and the Task Force has given final approval for construction for 5 of the 8 remaining projects. Construction has begun on one of the 4th PPL projects, Perry Ridge Bank Protection. The 5th PPL was approved by the Task Force on Feb. 28, 1996. Nine projects were named on the list. Additional funds in the amount of $38.4 million ($33.4 million Federal, $5.0 million State) were made available for construction of these projects. Due to the reduction in the State's funding capability, 3 of the projects were approved for phased construction, with the balance of their funding to come from future lists. Engineering and design on several of the projects has been completed, and the Task Force has given final approval for construction for 2 of the 9 projects. Two projects have been completed, Racoon Island Breakwaters Demo, July 97, and Freshwater Bayou Bank Stabilization, June 98. The 6th PPL was approved by the Task Force on April 24, 1997. Thirteen projects were named on the list; two of these were deauthorized. Additional funds in the amount of $49.1 million (39.1 million Federal, $10.0 million State) were made available for 11-10 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT construction of these projects and to fund 5th PPL phased projects. Four of the projects were approved for phased construction, with the balance of their funding to come from future lists. Engineering and design on several of the projects has been completed. One project, the Nutria Harvest for Wetland Restoration Demo is being implemented. The 7th PPL was approved by the Task Force on Jan. 16, 1998. Twelve projects were approved on the list; only four were approved with funding. Additional Federal funds in the amount of $42.5 million were made available for construction of these projects and to continue funding two phased projects, one on PPL 5 and one on PPL 6. Engineering and design on several of the projects has begun; however, construction has not yet begun on any of these projects. The 8th PPL was approved on Jan. 20, 1999. Seven projects were approved on the list. Additional Federal funds in the amount of $41.9 million were made available for construction of these projects and PPL's 5 and 6 phased projects. Preliminary construction schedules are presently being verified. In response to Section 303(b) of the CWPPRA, the Louisiana Coastal Wetlands Restoration Plan report was published in November 1993. Following public review of the final report, a Record of Decision was prepared, signed by the Task Force chairman, and submitted to HQUSACE for transmittal to the ASA(CW). The report proposed $1.3 billion worth of projects that could prevent 65 percent of the coastal wetland losses over the next 20 years. The State of Louisiana expressed its intention (by letter of Jan. 5, 1993) to develop a Conservation Plan in accordance with provisions of the CWPPRA. Once approved (by the Administrator of the EPA, the Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Secretary of the Army), the State's share in project construction will be reduced from 25 percent to 15 percent. The State submitted the plan to the approving agencies in May 1997. Approval was received on Nov. 21, 1997. Section 532 of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1996 amends the CWPPRA to provide for a further reduction in the State's share of CWPPRA projects. Upon approval of the Conservation Plan, the State's share of projects in 1996 and 1997 will be 10 percent. In a Sep. 3, 1996, speech in the House of Representatives, the Honorable Bud Shuster of Pennsylvania said that the intent of the legislation was to reduce the State's share of projects approved on the 5th and 6th Priority Project Lists. The amendment further provides that the Secretary of the Army must determine that a reduction in the non-Federal share is warranted. The Task Force approved a planning budget of $3,460,491 for program management and preparation of the 9th List. The Task Force is scheduled to complete the selection of the 9th Priority Project List in Dec 1999. In addition, $ 75,000 for the Mississippi River Sediment, Nutrient, and Freshwater Redistribution feasibility study and $200,000 for the Chenier Plain Study were approved. Recognizing that restoration of the state's coastal wetlands requires projects of a more complex nature and a larger scope that can be analyzed in the process of developing annual priority lists, the Task Force has authorized the initiation of two feasibility studies. Projects with costs of more than $40 million cannot be accommodated by the present funding stream of $35 million per year and would need authorization through a Water Resources Development Act or similar act for implementation. The Mississippi River Sediment, Nutrient, and Freshwater Redistribution study, which is being managed by the Corps of Engineers, is intended to develop a plan for optimizing the resources of the Mississippi River, giving consideration to the river's many uses (e.g., navigation and water supply, in addition to creation and nourishment of wetlands). The study is scheduled for completion in June 1999. The Louisiana Barrier Shoreline study which is being managed by the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, is intended to determine the feasibility of restoring the state's barrier islands and other shorelines to protect coastal wetlands and related resources. The first phase of this study is scheduled for completion in April 1999. In June 1997, the Task Force initiated a strategic planning effort called Coast 2050. The purpose of this program is to develop, within 18 months, a technically sound strategic plan to sustain coastal resources and provide an integrated multiple use approach to ecosystem management. The development of this strategy differs from the 1993 restoration plan in that regional strategies, rather than basin strategies, will be developed and prioritized. Also, the regional strategies will be integrated into other coastal uses, such as navigation, water supply, transportation, and flood protection. The effort involved soliciting public opinion 11-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 and recommendations on coastal planning and restoration efforts. The final draft of the Coast 2050 plan was completed in December 1998. 11-12 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 1998 2. Mississippi New Work River-Gulf Outlet, LA (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 3. Mississippi River Ship Channel-Gulf to Baton Rouge (Contrib. Funds) Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,000,000 1,861,000 1,370,000 2,323,000 107,250,200 993,639 1,927,198 1,371,613 1,922,193 106,740,010 8,911,000 17,005,000 21,173,000 16,028,000 235,971,476 9,025,191 17,004,481 20,342,160 15,570,763 234,607,940 -- 1,240,477' -- 1,196,477' 1,130,000 -1,840,000 1,485,000 2,185,000 23,850,000 2,480,533 1,267,380 1,424,837 2,245,266 23,599,828 535,000 1,120,479 4,772,000 20,256 4,757,224 4. Port Fourchon, LA 6. Comite River, LA (Diversion) 7. Grand Isle and Vicinity, LA (Contrib. Funds) Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 88,000 -104,000 12,498 2,569 225,000 105,000 56,835 83,210 1,190,000 159,000 296,000 367,000 1,078,838 341,114 279,840 313,000 -- 102,000 247,000 140,114 247,888 186,072 349,000 158,265 6,217,000 6,217,000 10,000 19,067,500 79,747 19,011,439 7,157,484 7,157,484 8. Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity, LA (Hurricane Protection) (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 9. Lake Pontchartrain Stormwater Discharge New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 13,300,000 13,348,000 17,025,000 22,920,000 369,422,000 20,694,000 17,094,000 18,367,390 12,695,193 358,326,000 2,200,000 3,522,000 2,073,018 814,000 3,038,000 1,056,430 1,292,290 16,374,000 12,288,000 673,000 550,000 2,650,000 9,000,000 14,596,000 333,000 320,000 3,286,913 10,462,748 14,514,661 11-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 11-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 1998 10. Larose to Golden Meadow, LA (Hurricane Protection) (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 2,200,000 1,101,000 489,000 938,000 70,731,000 2,577,891 1,167,000 398,829 827,614 70,521,443 910,000 273,000 987,000 -10,513 -- 4,528,000 330,054 4,528,000 11. Mermentau River, Grand Chenier, LA New Work (Fed) Approp. Cost New Work (Non-Fed) Approp. Cost 12. New Orleans to Venice, LA (Hurricane Protection) (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 13. Southeast Louisiana, Louisiana 14. Westbank Vicinity of New Orleans, LA (Hurricane Protection) 14a. Westwego to Harvey Canal, LA (Hurricane Protection) 14b. Westbank East of Harvey Canal New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 170 140 128,800 158,800 298,800 298,800 89,000 89,000 55 34,000 89,000 1,135,000 2,616,000 3,926,000 1,469,000 142,381,000 1,572,112 2,681,149 3,910,154 1,498,276 142,368,234 175,000 600,000 2,920,000 1,508,200 19,002,397 -- 804,026 1,632,249 1,813,000 17,846,761 -- 2,000,000 14,070,000 36,910,000 52,980,000 -- 1,693,390 7,613,261 41,841,635 51,148,286 3,693,000 3,618,000 6,999,000 4,123,000 34,857,000 4,013,899 7,438,028 6,534,898 4,143,471 34,224,377 -- 1,419,000 320,000 1,739,000 -- 836,297 813,707 1,650,004 11-14 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 1998 19. Coastal Wetlands New Work Planning, Protection Approp. 34,957,533 38,371,625 44,134,000 47,540,715 266,200,9832 and Restoration Cost 10,475,527 13,562,343 7,894,204 16,022,782 71,295,6992 (Contrib. Funds) Approp. -- -- 3,386,514 1,745,833 5,132,347 Cost -- -- 884,426 1,676,564 2,560,990 1. Contributed by Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans, for providing fill for future industrial sites adjacent to turning basin and for dredging cable and pipeline crossings. 2. All projects listed on the PPLs are fully funded up front including monitoring and O&M for the 20-year project life. 11-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 11-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 29, 1956 Oct. 22, 1976 Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Water Resources Development Act, 1996 LAKE CHARLES, LA The project for deepening of the project for navigation, Lake Charles, Louisiana, to a depth of 45 feet, at a total cost of $1,070,000. MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO GULF OF MEXICO, LA Combines projects of Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to New Orleans, Mississippi River, South Pass, and Southwest Pass, adding thereto project for Mississippi River from New Orleans to Head of Passes, to provide a single project, "Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico," with channel dimensions as follows: Baton Rouge to New Orleans, 35 by 500 feet; port limits of New Orleans, 35 by 1,500 feet; New Orleans to Head of Passes, 40 by 1,000 feet; Southwest Pass, 40 by 800 feet; Southwest Pass Bar Channel, 40 by 600 feet; South Pass, 30 by 450 feet; South Pass Bar Channel, 30 by 600 feet. Deepen existing channel from 35 to 40 feet by 500 feet wide from one-tenth mile below Louisiana Highway Commission bridge at Baton Rouge to upper limits of Port of New Orleans, and also 40 by 500 feet within presently authorized 35- by 1,500-foot channel in port limits of New Orleans. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET, LA (See Sec. 1 of Text) Construct a seaway canal 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide from Michoud to 38-foot contour in gulf and an inner tidewater harbor consisting of a 1,000- by 2,000-foot turning basin 36 feet deep and a connecting channel 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide to Inner Harbor Navigation Canal and provides, when economically justified, for construction of a lock to Mississippi River in the vicinity of Meraux, LA. Amends above Act making the construction of bridge relocations a Federal responsibility when required by the the construction of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet channel. The Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet feature is modified to provide that the replacement and expansion of the existing industrial canal lock and connecting channels or the construction of an additional lock and connecting channels shall be in the area of the existing lock or at the Violet site. Amends above Act of 1986 to include a Community Impact Mitigation Plan as an authorized feature of the project to replace the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 H. Doc. 215, 76th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 36, 87th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 245, 82d Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 186, Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (PL 94-587) 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 Public Law 104-303 Oct. 12, 1996 11-16 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Approp. Act of 1985, dated Jul. 2, 1986 (PL 99-88) Nov. 17, 1986 (PL 99-662) Water Resources Development Act, 1996 Aug. 30, 1985 Oct. 23, 1962 Water Resources Development Act, 1986 MISSISSIPPI RIVER SHIP CHANNEL, GULF TO BATON ROUGE, LA (See Sec. 3 of Text) Will provide more efficient deep-draft navigation access to the New Orleans and Baton Rouge reaches of the Mississippi River via Southwest Pass by enlarging the existing channel to a project depth of 55 feet and enlarging the adjacent channel along the left descending bank in New Orleans Harbor to a 40-foot depth, a turning basin at Baton Rouge, and training works in the passes to reduce maintenance. Formalizes the cost sharing provisions of the project, permits the State of Louisiana to enact user fees to defray their portion of the project costs, and implements harbor maintenance fees to help pay for the Federal cost of the project. It also provides an option to the local sponsor to defer their initial payment for one year following initiation of construction. In terms of channel depths up to 45 feet, the cost sharing requirements are 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal for construction and 100 percent Federal for maintenance. For channels deeper than 45 feet, the cost sharing requirements are 50 percent Federal and 50 percent non-Federal for both construction and maintenance. PORT FOURCHON, LA Provides a Federal navigation channel with a project depth of 24 feet MLLW in Bayou Lafourche, Belle Pass, and the Gulf of Mexico to improve navigation access to Port Fourchon at a total cost of $4,440,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $2,300,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $2,140,000. WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO BAYOU DULAC, LA (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, LA) Channel 5 by 40 feet from Intracoastal Waterway at Houma through Bayou LeCarpe, Bayou Pelton, and Bayou Grand Caillou to Bayou Dulac, about 16.3 miles. Channel 10 by 45 feet in Bayou LeCarpe from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to Houma navigation canal. BAYOU RIGOLETTE, LA A project to construct six additional floodgates at Bayou Rigolette, LA, adjacent to the existing drainage structure, at a total cost of $2,300,000. H. Doc. 2577, 99th Cong., 1st sess. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 104-303, 104th Congress (See Section 101) Oct. 12, 1996 H. Doc. 206, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 11-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 11-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Water Resources Development Act, 1992 COMITE RIVER, LA (Diversion) (See Sec. 6 of Text) Construct an eight-mile diversion channel from the Comite River to an outfall into Lilly Bayou, and then a four-mile diversion along Lilly and Cooper Bayous to the Profit Island Chute of the Mississippi River. Also included is a stage control structure in the Comite River at the diversion point, a diversion structure in the new channel near the diversion point, a stage control structure and an outfall structure near and at the outfall into Lilly Bayou, and three control structures at the intersections of Whites, Cypress and Baton Rouge Bayous. Public Law 102-580 Section 101 (11) Oct. 31, 1992 Water Resources Development Act, 1996 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, FY 1999 Adopted by Committee Resolutions Sep. 23, 1976, and Oct. 1, 19762 Oct. 27, 1965 Section 107, Rivers and Harbors Act of 1960, as amended Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 Provided funding authority in the amount of $930,000 to initiate construction. GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LA (See Sec. 7 of Text) To provide hurricane protection by placement of a berm and vegetated dune extending the length of Grand Isle's gulf shore and a jetty to stabilize the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN AND VICINITY, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) (See Sec. 8 of Text) Control of hurricane tides by construction of two independent units, the Lake Pontchartrain Barrier plan and the Chalmette Area plan. NORTH PASS - PASS MANCHAC, LA The Corps of Engineers may construct small river and harbor improvement projects not specifically authorized by Congress when they will result in substantial benefits to navigation. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, NORTH SHORE, LA The project for navigation, Lake Pontchartrain North Shore, LA: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated February 14, 1979, at a total cost of $1,310,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $655,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $655,000. Public Law 104-305 Section 301(b)(5) Oct. 12, 1996 Public Law 105-245 Oct. 7, 1998 H. Doc. 639, 94th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 231, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 86-645 Jul. 14, 1960 Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. 11-18 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Water Resources Development Act, 1992 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 27, 1965 Section 14, Flood Control Act of 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, FY 1996 Water Resources Development Act, 1996 LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN STORMWATER DISCHARGE, LA (See Section 9 of Text) Provides for design and construction of project to to address water quality problems associated with stormwater discharges. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) (See Sec. 10 of Text) A loop levee about 40 miles long along both banks of Bayou Lafourche from Golden Meadow to Larose; enlargement of 3 miles of existing levee at Golden Meadow; floodgates for navigation and hurricane protection in Bayou Lafourche at upper and lower bayou crossings; about 8 miles of low interior levees to regulate intercepted drainage; and seven multibarreled culverts controlled by flapgates. MORGAN CITY AND VICINITY, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION Construction of new levees along Lake Palourde and Bayou Ramos, levee to tie-in with Bayou Boeuf lock levee and three gravity drainage structures in Morgan City unit and enlargement of bank levee, construction of new levee, and construction of one floodgate and five gravity drainage. structures in Franklin and vicinity unit. The Franklin Area reparable element is currently under review for deauthorization in accordance with WRDA 1990. MERMENATU RIVER - GRAND CHENIER, LA (See Sec. 11 of Text) Construction of emergency bank-protection works to prevent flood damage to highways, bridge approaches and public works. NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION (See Sec. 12 of Text) Improvements along Mississippi River below New Orleans, LA, for prevention of hurricane tidal flood damages by increasing heights of existing back levees and modifying existing drainage facilities where necessary in five separate reaches. SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA, LA (See Section 13 of text) Provides for drainage canal and pump station improvements in Orleans and Jefferson Parishes, and drainage improvements, flood protection and structure raising in St. Tammany Parish. Public Law 102-580 H. Doc. 184, 89th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 167, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 526, 79th Cong, 2d sess. Jul. 24, 1946 H. Doc. 550, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 104-46 (Sec 108) Public Law 104-303 (Sec 533) 11-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 11-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Water Resources Development Act, 1996 WEST BANK HURRICANE PROTECTION LEVEE, JEFFERSON PARISH, LA, WESTWEGO TO HARVEY CANAL (See Sec. 14 of Text) Structural and nonstructural measures to prevent flood damage to those areas identified in the Feb. 1984 draft Environmental Impact Statement for the West Bank Hurricane Protection Levee, Jefferson Parish, LA, at a total cost of $61,500,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $40,000,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $21,500,000. Funds provided by non-Federal interest for interim hurricane protection may be considered beneficial expenditures and may be credited as part of the non- Federal contribution of the project pursuant to Section 104 of this Act. Section 101(a) (17) of WRDA 1996 states: The West Bank Hurricane Protection Levee, Jefferson Parish, Louisiana project, authorized by section 401(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662): 100 Stat. 4128) is modified to authorize the Secretary to extend protection to areas east of the Harvey Canal, including an area east of the Algiers Canal: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated May 1, 1995, at a total cost of $217,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $141,400,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $75,600,000. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 Public Law 104-303 WESTWEGO TO HARVEY CANAL, LOUISIANA (Section 101(b) (11)) If a favorable post authorization change report is issued not later than Dec. 31, 1996, the project for hurricane damage prevention and flood control. Westwego to Harvey Canal, Louisiana, authorized by section 401(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662; Stat. 4128), is modified to include the Lake Cataouatche area levee as part of the project at a total cost of $14,375,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $9,344,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,031,000. Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection and Restoration Act COASTAL WETLANDS PLANNING, PROTECTION AND RESTORATION ACT (See Section 19 of Text) Directed the Secretary of the Army to convene the Louisiana Coastal Wetlands Conservation and Restoration Task Force to initiate a process to identify and prepare a list of coastal wetlands restoration projects in Louisiana to provide for the long-term conservation of such wetlands and dependent fish and wildlife populations in order of priority in creating, Public Law 101-64 Nov. 24, 1990 Section 301-306 restoring, protecting, and enhancing coastal wetlands, taking into account the quality of such coastal wetlands, with due allowance for small-scale projects necessary to demonstrate the use of new techniques or materials for coastal wetlands restoration. 1. Contains latest published map. 2. Permanent Appropriation Repeal Act. 11-20 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1998 For Last Mo. and Yr. Full Report Operation Completed See Annual and Deauthorized Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance or Reclassified Alteration of Berwick Bay Bridge' Amite River and Bayou Manchac, LA Aquatic Plant Control Program, LA Atchafalaya River Bayous Chene Boeuf, and Black, LA Atchafalaya River, Morgan City to Gulf of Mexico, LA Barataria Bay Waterway, LA Bayou Bonfouca, LA Bayou Dorcheat, Loggy Bayou and Lake Bisteneau, LA2,34''5 Bayou Dupre, LA Bayou Lacombe, LA Bayou Lafourche and Lafourche Jump Waterway, LA Bayou La Lautre, St. Malo, and Yscolskey, LA Bayou Plaquemine Brule, LA Bayou Queue de Tortue, LA Bayou Segnette Waterway, LA Bayou Teche, LA Bayou Teche & Vermilion River, LA Bayou Terrebonne, LA3',7 Bayou Vermilion, LA3 Big Pigeon and Little Pigeon Bayous, LA Calcasieu River and Pass, LA Calcasieu River at Coon Island, LA8 Calcasieu River at Devil's Elbow, LA Cascasieu River Salt Water Barrier, LA9 Cane River, LA25 Chefuncte River and Bogue Falia, LA Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, TX, and Shreveport, LAt Freshwater Bayou, LA Grand Bayou Pass, LA Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL, & Mexican Border Houma Navigation Canal, LA Inland Waterway from Franklin to Mermentau River, LA"" Intracoastal Waterway from the Mississippi River to Bayou Teche, LA' 2 Lake Charles Deep Water Channel, LA'3 Leland Bowman Lock, LA Little Caillou Bayou, LA Mermentau River, Bayou Nezpique, and Bay Des Cannes, LA Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete 1967 1978 1984 1984 1981 1984 1974 1887 1968 1967 1984 1970 1950 1970 1958 1984 1983 1961 1947 1936 1984 1976 1981 1973 1910 1967 1971 1984 1950 1985 1984 1960 1956 1950 1987 1973 1977 28,234 17,098,851 69,087 30,356,691 132,289,155 501,963 1,572,685 30,997 5,000 38,915 4,716 1,624,424 96,916 33,410 33,355 238,828 754,330 2,891,822 120,089 34,900 -- 27,830,835 1,015,81410 5,856,200 4,197,262 2,500 58,342 202,817 7,116,224 7,676 31,199,728 320,758 104,187 119,191 2,208,439 223,616 36,780 28,315 701,578 9,083,745 2,689,002 251,691 200,169 37,169 170,076,972 -- 2,000 463,401 452,611 33,903,588 14,48010 63,284,470 535,543,548 -- 32,266,728 249,052 32,200,010 77,761 5,197,975 '4 552,780 11,699 241,896 751,485 114,519 11-21 1928 1914 Nov. 1963 1931 1939 1938 May 1956 1915 Mar. 1923 -- Mar. 1957 1916 1896 2 Oct. 1968 Apr. 1974 Sep. 1978 Jan. 1968 -- 1959 Dec. 1914 Aug. 1968 1939 2 Mar. 1985 1929 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 11-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (Continued) Cost to Sep. 1998 For Last Mo. and Yr. Full Report Operation Completed See Annual and Deauthorized Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance or Reclassified Mermentau River, LA Complete 1985 4,672,579 38,327,543 Jul. 1952 Mississippi River Baton Rouge to Gulf of Mexico, LA -- 1991 84,568,12816 1,010,334,68317 -- Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, -- 21 1996 88,535,00020 234,408,378 Jan. 196821 Michoud Canal, LA Complete 1976 2,499,555 1,271,252 Nov. 1974 Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, LA Complete 1986 10,014,012 31,528,020 Complete Navigation work under special authorization (Calcasieu Pass channel in Old River Bend at Cameron, LA)'5 -- 1957 -- 139,755 -- North Pass-Pass Manchac, LA Complete 1996 533,492 -- May 1995 Pass Manchac, LA Complete 1950 79,845 124,681 1912 Petite Anse, Tigre, and Carlin Bayous, LA Complete 1981 -- 1,453,172 Nov. 1980 Removal of Aquatic Growth, LA 1984 -- 43,623,657 Sulphur River, AR and TX2,5 -- 1919 45,989 -- -- Tangipahoa River, LA -- 1985 -- 1,974,229 -- Tickfaw, Natalbany, Ponchatoula, and Blood Rivers, LA3 Complete 1973 8,115 93,565 1921 Waterway from White Lake to Pecan Island, LA" -- 1948 10,904 742 -- Waterway from Empire, LA, to Gulf of Mexico Complete 1981 1,068,142 1,661,043 Jun. 1950 Waterway from Intracoastal Waterway to Bayou Dulac, LA Complete 1990 641,608 1,867,832 Aug. 1964 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. Transferred to Department of Transportation. Authorized under Truman-Hobbs Act. Completed. Date will be furnished when available. Includes previous project costs. No commerce reported. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. Completed except that portion above mile 10.3 providing for widening from 40 feet to 60 feet, which is inactive. By Public Law 88-404, that portion of Bayou Terrebonne between point where Barrow Street crosses said stream and a line determined by prolonging and extending eastern right-of-way line of New Orleans Boulevard southerly to south bank of said stream was declared nonnavigable. Includes $66,000 contributed funds. Operation and maintenance of the structure reported under project "Calcasieu River and Pass, LA." Excludes $50,000 contributed funds. Not completed; incorporated in navigation project "Mermentau River, LA." Not completed; superseded for most of it length by present 12- by 125-foot Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, which coincides with or parallels it. Maintenance project; no future work schedules. Includes $57,555 ($29,974 of which was from Public Works funds) for new work on previous project. Includes $114,519 for maintenance of previous project. Work is under continuing authority. Includes $1,729,989 for previous project. 11-22 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (Continued) 17. Does not include allotment of $40,000 (9613123). 18. Does not include expenditures of $63,370 (9613123). 19. Includes $169,055 for previous projects and $3,379,676 from permanent indefinite appropriation. 20. Includes $8,811,000 Non-Federal Costs. 21. Channel completed except for IHNC Lock replacement and foreshore protection. 11-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 11-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1998 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Constr iction Maintenance Completed Amite River and Tributaries, LA 1964 3,034,255' -- Feb. 1964 Bayou Choupique, LA2 1954 129,930 -- Mar. 1954 Bayou Rapides, LA2 1952 95,179 -- Dec. 1951 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA 1979 1,018,005 -- -- Morgan City and Vicinity, LA 1992 1,975,628 -- -- 1. In addition, the following was expended from contributed funds: Amite River and tributaries ................. $ 430 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA ....... 425,209 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended) 11-24 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-E DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Date Federal Contributed Report See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report for Authority Expended Expended Baton Rouge Harbor 1946 Nov. 2, 1979 Segment Between Section 12, Mi 2.5 and 5.0 Public Law 93-251 (WRDA 74) Bayou Grosse Tete, 1969 May 6, 1981 LA DAEN-CWP-A Letter Subj: Completed Action on 5th Deauthorization Rpt, dated Jun. 17, 1981 Lake Borgne and 1942 Nov 1979 Chef Menteur Bulkheads and Jetties Vinton Waterway, LA 1950 Nov. 2, 1979 Section 12, Public Law 93-251 (WRDA of 1974) 11-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 11-F FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, P.L. 858 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) FISCAL YEAR COST Project Federal Non-Federal Total Bayou Tete L'Ours, LA 44,414 44,414 Crown Point Basin, LA 96,970 96,970 Goose Bayou Basin, LA 97,923 97,923 Jean Lafitte, LA (Fisher School Basin) 88,255 77,995 166,250 Little Bayou Castine, LA 48,273 48,273 Lockport to La Rose, LA 63,327 63,327 Lower Lafitte Basin, LA 97,339 97,339 Pailet Basin, LA 99,841 99,841 Rosethorne Basin in Lafitte, LA 70,028 29,058 99,086 Section 205 Coordination 10,097 10,097 W14 Canal Basin, Slidell, LA 8 8 Total Section 205 716,475 107,053 823,528 Emergency StreamBank & Shoreline Protection (Section 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, P.L. 526) (Section 27 of the 1974 Water Resources Development Act) FISCAL YEAR COST Project Federal Non-Federal Total Fagan Drive Bridge, Arnolds Creek, LA 2,637 2,637 Highway 16, Tangipahoa 71 71 Scotlandville Bluff, LA 21,569 21,569 Section 14 Coordination 10,245 10,245 Stage Highway 1185, Site 1 45,060 45,060 State Highway 3066 Below Indian Village 62,828 62,828 St. Joseph's Catholic Church, Pierre Port, LA 199,262 107,495 306,757 Total Section 14 341,672 107,495 449,167 11-26 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-G ENVIRONMENTAL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Wetland/Other Aquatic Habitat Creation Section 204, Public Law 102-560 FISCAL YEAR COST Project Federal Non-Federal Total Barataria Bay Waterway, Grand Terre Island, Jefferson Parish, LA 13,054 13,054 Brown Lake, Cameron and Calcasieu Parishes, LA 5,881 5,881 Houma Navigation Canal 91 91 Mississippi River - Gulf Outlet, MI 943 943 Sabine National Wildlife 16 16 Sabine National Wildlife Refuge, LA 15,285 15,285 Total Sec. 204 35,270 35,270 Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Section 206, Public Law 104-303 FISCAL YEAR COST Project Federal Non-Federal Total Aquatic Plant Control 7,684 7,684 Coordination Account Funds 4,946 4,946 Preliminary Restoration Plans 11,209 11,209 Total Section 206 23,839 23,839 Project modifications to improve environment Section 1135, Public Law 99-662 FISCAL YEAR COST Project Federal Non-Federal Total Coordination Account Funds 8,005 8,005 Initial Appraisals 11,456 11,456 Gulf Intercoastal Waterway, Plaquemines Lock, LA 25,515 25,515 South Pass, Miss. River, Baton Rouge to Gulf of Mexico 655 655 Total Section 1135 45,631 45,631 11-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 11-H ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) Item and CWIS Number FFIISSCCAALL YYEEAARR CCOOSSTT Federal Non-Federal Total SURVEYS (Category 100) Navigation(110) Intracoastal Waterway Locks, LA-81289 Mississippi River Ship Channel Improvements, LA-10454 Morganza, LA to Gulf of Mexico-012875 Subtotal Flood Damage Prevention Studies(120) Amite River-Darlington Reservoir-81304 Amite River & Tributaries, LA-50100 Bayou Blanc, Crowley, LA-13325 Bayou Tigre, Erath, LA-13291 Black Bayou, Diversion, LA-13290 Jefferson Parish, LA-13236 Lafayette Parish, LA-13251 Orleans Parish, LA-13237 West Shore, Lake Pontchartrain-10455 Subtotal Special Studies(140) Environmental Services Partnerships-14190 Sabine Diversion Canal, LA-10493 Subtotal Miscellaneous Activities(170) Gulf of Mexico Program-17251 Interagency Water Resources Development-14713 National Estuary Program-53903 North American Waterfowl Management-53904 Special Investigations-17250 Subtotal Planning Assistance to States(186) Alexandria, LA Data Management-22041 Ascension Parish Hydrologic & Hydraulic Modeling-022040 Calcasieu Parish Data Management-022043 Chitimacha Indian Tribe Emergency Preparation-071502 Chitimacha Indian Tribe Emergency Response Phase 2-071505 Chitimacha Indian Tribe Hydrologic & Hydraulic Analysis-071504 Chitmacha Indian Tribe River Corridor-071503 City of Hammond, LA Data Management-022038 Comprehensive Performance Evaluations-022036 E. Baton Rouge Parish Data Management-022032 E. Baton Rouge Parish GIS Mapping-022028 Evangeline Parish Environment-022042 Flood Warning/Preparation Regional Plan-022021 Louisiana Flood Preparation-022031 Orleans Parish Data Management-022037 Plaquemines City Bank Stabilization-022033 Plaquemines Parish Data Management-022039 Plaquemines Parish GIS Mapping-022030 703,400 321,841 703,400 321,841 342,341 342,341 1,025,241 342,341 1,367,582 24,894 24,894 1,405 2,980 4,385 503 503 598 598 3,868 3,868 223,510 83,718 307,228 709,518 178,382 887,900 249,605 14,407 264,012 260,695 260,695 1,474,596 279,487 1,754,083 520 520 13,184 13,184 13,704 13,704 132,550 132,550 34,529 34,529 6,922 6,922 3,051 3,051 13,421 13,421 190,473 190,473 1,565 68,511 57,582 130,217 5,616 22,954 49,951 1 114,532 39,894 2,562 66,364 8 235,878 71,780 4,450 161,290 238 26 31,422 37,756 12,378 7,171 216 4,201 49,507 2,413 70,056 26 304,389 129,362 4,450 291,507 5,854 26 54,376 87,707 1 126,910 7,171 216 4,201 89,401 4,975 136,420 34 11-28 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-H ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (Continued) (96x3121) Item and CWIS Number FISCAL YEAR COST Federal Non-Federal Total St. Charles Parish Water Resources Data Management-022035 St. Gabriel, LA GIS Mapping-022026 W. Baton Rouge Parish Riverfront Development-022034 Subtotal TOTAL (Category 100) COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Floodplain Management Services(250) Flood Plain Management-82030 Quick Responses-82045 Technical Services-82040 Special Studies, Chickasha, OK/Swan Lake & Reservoir-83009 Special Studies, Kinder, LA-083013 Special Studies, Tickfaw, LA-083012 Special Studies- Town of Livingston-083171 Southwest, LA. Hurricane Study-083152 Subtotal TOTAL (Category 200) PROJECTS NOT AUTHORIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION (Category 400) Navigation Projects (421) Bayou Lafourche and Lafourche Jump, Waterway, LA-10009 Subtotal Flood Control Projects (450) East Baton Rouge Parish, LA-12909 West Bank, East of Harvey Canal, LA-59360 Subtotal TOTAL (Category 400) PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (Category 600) Flood Control Projects (650) Comite River, LA-77059 Subtotal TOTAL (Category 600) 3,879 600 1 011 565,247 3,003 6,882 600 14,563 15,574 706,374 1,271,621 $ 3,296,261 1,328,202 4,597,463 24,690 24,690 6,308 6,308 112,979 112,979 2,105 2,105 61,025 61,025 15,210 15,210 19,119 19,119 24,832 24,832 266,268 266,268 $ 266,268 266,268 $ 83,210 83,210 83,210 83,210 350,973 350,973 $ 377 377 351,350 351,350 $ 434,560 434,560 $ 389,467 389,467 389,467 389,467 $ 389,467 389,467 11-29 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $4,359,556 1,328,202 5,687,758 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT * This district comprises western and central Mississippi, southern Arkansas, northern Louisiana, and a very small portion of southwestern Tennessee, embraced in drainage basins of eastern tributaries of Mississippi River south of Horn Lake Creek to and including Buffalo River; Pearl River Basin in Mississippi; independent tributaries of the Gulf of Mexico south of the Buffalo River Basin to the Mississippi-Louisiana state line; western tributaries of Mississippi River between White and Atchafalaya Rivers including Arkansas River Basin below a point 3 miles upstream from Pine Bluff and Arkansas River below mile 36.1 near Pendleton, AR; Ouachita and Black Rivers in Arkansas and Louisiana; and Red River in Louisiana and Arkansas to the Texas-Arkansas state line. The Vicksburg District territory encompasses 68,000 square miles. Navigation 1. Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR .................... 2. Red River emergency bank protection... 3. Red River Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA ............ 4. Navigation work under special authorization .................... Flood Control 5. Aloha Rigolette, LA ............... 6. McKinney Bayou, AR ............. 7. Ouachita River Levees, LA .......... 8. Ouachita River and tributaries AR and LA ..................... 9. Pearl River Basin, MS and LA ....... 10. Pearl River, Slidell, St. Tammany Parish, LA ...................... 11. Red River below Denison Dam (Vicksburg Dist.) ................. 12. Red River below Denison Dam, levees and bank stabilization (Vicksburg District) ...................... 13. West Agurs, LA, Levee ............ 14. Inspection of completed Flood Control Projects ........................ 15. Flood control work under special authorization .................... IMPROVEMENTS Page Flood Control (cont.) 12-2 12-2 12-3 12-3 16. Ecosystem Restoration Work Under Special Authorization .............. 17. Catastrophic Disaster Preparedness Program ....................... 18. General Regulatory Program ......... Page 12-9 12-9 12-9 Tables Table 12-A Cost and Financial Statement .. 12-10 Table 12-B Authorizing Legislation ...... 12-12 12-4 Table 12-C Ouachita and Black Rivers, 12-4 AR and LA (9-Foot Project), 12-4 Locks and Dams ........... 12-16 Table 12-D Other Authorized Navigation 12-5 Project ................. 12-17 12-5 Table 12-E Ouachita River and Tributaries-Existing Project ... 12-19 12-7 Table 12-F Red River Below Denison Dam (Vicksburg District) 12-7 New Projects ............. 12-20 Table 12-G Red River Below Denison Dam (Vicksburg District) 12-7 Incorporated Projects ........ 12-21 12-8 Table 12-H Other Authorized Flood Control Projects............ 12-22 12-8 Table 12-I Deauthorized Projects ....... 12-24 Table 12-J Active General 12-8 Investigations ............. 12-25 12-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Navigation 1. OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS BELOW CAMDEN, AR Location. Ouachita River rises in Polk County, AR, and flows southeasterly and southerly about 600 miles. Below its confluence with the Tensas and Little Rivers at Jonesville, LA, it is called Black River, which enters Red River 35.5 miles from the Mississippi River. Previous projects. See page 683 of Annual Report for 1962 for details. Existing project. See page 684 of Annual Report for 1962 for details of the old 6.5-foot navigation project. Modified project and project for Red River below Fulton, AR, provide for a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide in Red River between Old River and mouth of Black River, and in Black and Ouachita Rivers from mouth of Black River to Camden, AR. Authorized features for the modified project include four new locks and dams, in-river construction dredging to achieve a 9-foot navigation channel depth, and channel realignment. All 4 locks and dams are complete and in operation and initial channel dredging is complete providing 9-foot navigation depth. Remaining work consists of realignment of 25 restricted bendway sites between river miles 195 at Sterlington, LA, and river mile 335 at Camden, AR, on the Ouachita River. With these improvements in place the river system will be navigable by a four-barge tow (two abreast) to Crossett, AR, river mile 237, and a two-barge tow (abreast) to Camden, AR. Mitigation features include the 65,000-acre Felsenthal National Wildlife Refuge in Arkansas, the 18,000-acre D'Arbonne National Wildlife Refuge in Louisiana, a series of recreation facilities along the waterway, and improvements to Catahoula Lake to preserve it for migratory waterfowl. Estimated total cost for the nine-foot navigation project is $281,009,000 which includes $263,000,000 Federal costs and $18,009,000 non-Federal costs. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to furnish the construction rights-of-way for the realignment work. Seven of the 25 sites are within the Felsenthal National Wildlife Refuge and are already owned by the Federal Government. However, there have been no indications that the land for the remaining 18 sites will be forthcoming because of strong opposition to the realignment work by local environmental groups. The six remaining recreation facilities are unscheduled at this time due to the lack of required cost sharing agreements. Terminal facilities. Public loading docks are at Columbia, LA, and Camden and Crossett, AR. Privately owned docks and loading and unloading facilities are at Columbia, Monroe, and Sterlington, LA, and El Dorado, Calion, and Camden, AR. Two grain-handling facilities and a petroleum-loading facility are in the vicinity of Jonesville, LA, a grain-handling facility is in the vicinity of Acme, LA, and a petroleum-loading facility is in the vicinity of Smackover, AR. Operations and results during fiscal year. In FY 98, maintenance dredging was performed from Camden, AR, to the mouth of the Black River by the contract Dredge North Carolina. 696,128 cubic yards of material were moved from the navigation channel. Condition as of Sep. 30. The project is 92 percent complete and provides limited navigation as far north as Camden, AR. All four locks and dams associated with the project are complete and in operation. Design and construction of the remaining features is on hold pending a consensus between the states of Arkansas and Louisiana concerning the type of development desired or the additional studies needed to reach a decision. 2. RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION Location. In northwest Louisiana, southwest Arkansas, and northeast Texas, along the Red and Old Rivers between the Mississippi River and the head of the levee system above Index, AR. Existing project. Provides for realigning the banks by means of cutoffs and training works and for stabilizing banks by means of revetments, dikes, and other methods as emergency conditions may require in advance of developing the design for the entire Red River Waterway project. Estimated cost for this work (October 1997) is $112,862,000 Federal and $2,182,000 non-Federal, including a cash contribution of $7,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see pages 11-19 to 11-20, Annual Report FY 80. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction was completed on Hurricane and Cat Island Revetments in ARK and LA, respectively. 12-2 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in October 1972 and is 99 percent complete. 3. RED RIVER WATERWAYPROJECT Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA Reach Location. From east central to northwest Louisiana along the Red and Old Rivers between the Mississippi River and Shreveport, LA. Existing project. Provides a navigation route from the Mississippi River at the junction with Old River via Old and Red River to Shreveport, LA, developing a channel approximately 236 miles long, 9 feet deep, and 200 feet wide. The development includes five locks and dams, realignment and contraction of the river as necessary to develop an efficient channel, and bank stabilization as necessary to hold the newly developed channel in position. Facilities to provide and acquisition of wildlife mitigation lands opportunities for recreation and for fish and wildlife development and acquisition of wildlife mitigation lands are an integral part of the project. Estimated cost for new work is $1,896,133,000 Federal and $88,833,000 non-Federal. The Federal cost includes $442,000 for aids to navigation by U.S. Coast Guard. Local cooperation. For details see page 11-21, Annual Report FY 80. The Red River Waterway Commission, governing body of the Red River Waterway District, executed an act of assurance for all project features in Louisiana on Feb. 26, 1969, supported by resolution dated Jan. 30, 1969. The assurances were accepted for and on behalf of the United States on Apr. 15, 1969. The Commission furnished amended assurances covering the provisions of Public Law 91-646 and Public Law 91-611 on May 23, 1973, for the portion of the project within Louisiana. These were accepted for and on behalf of the United States on Nov. 14, 1973. A Local Cooperation Agreement between the Department of the Army and the Red River Waterway Commission for the acquisition of mitigation lands in the vicinity of Loggy Bayou Wildlife Management Area was executed on Jun. 16, 1993, and a project cooperation agreement between the same agencies for the acquisition of mitigation lands in the vicinity of Bayou Bodcau was executed on July 17, 1996. Terminal facilities. Local interests are to provide adequate terminal facilities along the waterway. The Corps entered into an agreement with the City of Alexandria, LA, whereby material excavated from the Philip Bayou Realignment could be used as fill for port construction at mile 109. Construction of the realignment and port fill are complete. Construction of the Caddo--Bossier and Natchitoches Parish ports by local interests is underway. Operations and results during fiscal year. The following contracts were completed in FY 98: Eagle Bend Capout, PH. I; Socot Capout PH III; and Campti Capout and Hadden-Ft. Derussy Repairs. Engineering and design for additional channel work was continued. Ile Au Vaches Dikes and Ben Routh reinforcement work was initiated. In addition, acquisition of mitigation lands in the Bayou Bodcau area was initiated. Maintenance dredging was performed along the waterway by the Contract Dredge Butcher, Dredge Marion, and Dredge North Carolina during Fiscal Year 1998. 2,233,925 cubic yards of material were removed from the navigation channel. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in July 1973, and project is 88 percent complete. Feasibility phase studies were authorized by WRDA 96. Funds of $600,000 were provided by Congress in FY 98 to initiate studies to determine the feasibility of extending navigation on the Red River from the vicinity of Shreveport, LA, to the vicinity of Index, AR, or to any justifiable interim point. Feasibility phase studies were not recommended. 4. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 87-645, as amended. In FY 98, $133 was expended on Section 107 Coordination Account; $13,929 on Yazoo Diversion Canal, MS and $23,598 on Columbia Port, Ouachita Parish, LA. 12-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Flood Control 5. ALOHA-RIGOLETTE AREA, LA Location. The project is located in north-central Louisiana between the towns of Winnfield and Pineville on the left descending bank of the Red River. Authorized Project. The recommended plan consists of a three-barrel floodgate structure installed at the mouth of Bayou Darrow to reopen it to the Red River, 8.2 miles of clearing and snagging on Bayou Darrow from its mouth upstream to Bayou Rigolette, construction of a closure and low-flow structure on Bayou Rigolette just below its junction with Bayou Darrow, and realignment of Sam's Bayou and appropriate mitigation features. Local Cooperation. The City of Colfax, LA, has agreed to cost share this project. The Project Cooperation Agreement was signed on Sept. 19, 1994. Operations And Results During Fiscal Year. Construction underway on the Bayou Darrow Structure and Low Flow Structure Item 4. Row Acquisition for Item 3 is underway. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction underway on Items 1 and 2, Item 4 issued Sep 21, 1998. 6. MCKINNEY BAYOU, AR Location. The project area is located in southwestern Arkansas in the vicinity of Texarkana, AR and TX. The McKinney Bayou area is a crescent-shaped watershed located adjacent to the Red River containing approximately 340 square miles. Existing project. The authorized project consists of flow diversion to the Red River at the state line between Arkansas and Texas, flow diversion into the Red River at Buzzard Bluff, improvement of McKinney Bayou channel, and land acquisition for mitigation. The State Line Diversion, Buzzard Bluff Diversion, and channel improvement features have subsequently been reclassified to the inactive category due to a lack of local support or lack of economic justification. Alternative plans developed to reduce flooding consisted of various channel improvements on the lower 27.6 miles of McKinney Bayou. A clearing and snagging alternative with project first costs of $3.2 million and a plan combining clearing and snagging with channel improvement with project first costs of $4.9 million were found economically feasible. Shortly after initiation of reconnaissance studies, Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, in an effort to streamline the study process, approved proceeding directly from the reconnaissance phase to preconstruction engineering and design (PED), subject to reconnaissance study finding being substantially in accordance with the authorized McKinney Bayou project and with previous U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New Orleans Disrict, study findings. Under this arrangement, the cost-shared feasibility phase would be eliminated. Study findings substantiated this decision. As a result, it was recommended that the study effort progress into PED. The reconnaissance report was approved by the U.S. Army Corps, Mississippi Valley Division, on May 12, 1997. The plan recommended for implementation would be developed during PED. The local cost-sharing sponsors, the Miller County Improvement and Drainage District and the McKinney Bayou Drainage District have indicated by letters dated Sep. 24, and Sep. 30, 1997, respectively, that they do not have the financial resources to undertake project construction. Therefore, they do not wish to continue into the next project development phase, PED. The project is being held in abeyance pending further developments regarding the local sponsor's ability to cost-share. If this cost-sharing issue cannot be resolved, all activities associated with the project will be terminated and it will be classified as inactive. Condition as of Sep. 30. A new start reconnaissance study was initiated in January 1996. This restudy of the authorized project to address the feasibility of channel improvements on McKinney Bayou to reduce flooding of agricultural and other properties was completed in March 1997. Project is approved to proceed directly into preconstruction engineering and design pending execution of a PED cost sharing agreement. 7. OUACHITA RIVER LEVEES, LA Location. East bank of Ouachita River between Bastrop, LA, and Sandy Bayou. Loop levees on the west bank at West Monroe, Columbia, and Bawcomville. Existing project. There are 105.8 miles of levee on the east bank and 11.6 miles of levee in the three loops on the west bank. A Summary Report authorized gravel surfacing 117.4 miles of levee, and enlarging 36.6 miles of levee. Estimated Federal cost is $29,500,000. Estimated non-Federal cost is $5,404,000. 12-4 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT Local cooperation. Requirements and assurances of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-6 of FY 80 Annual Report. A supplemental agreement for the Bawcomville segment was executed in FY 90. The 1991 Water and Energy Appropriations Act gave the Federal government responsibility for the repair and/or replacement of the deteriorated drainage structures. The Assurances Agreement for Local Cooperation was supplemented to reflect this change in responsibility. The supplemental agreement covered work performed in Fiscal Years 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997. Condition as of Sep. 30. Item 1 of the Monroe to Sandy Bayou Levee enlargement project was completed Jul. 7, 1978. Additional work was deferred pending results of a comprehensive study of the entire Ouachita River Levee System. A summary report indicating that it is economically feasible to raise portions of the existing levee to authorized grade and that complete rehabilitation of the levee system was necessary was approved by LMVD on Oct. 1, 1986. The study results were disseminated to the project sponsor and interested parties in October 1986. The Project was reclassified as an active project on May 7, 1987. The final summary report was sent to the Office of the Chief of Engineers in July 1988 and design was initiated on the Bawcomville segment of the Ouachita River levees. A construction contract for the Bawcomville levee enlargement was awarded in FY 90, and is complete. In FY 97 four deteriorated culverts were lined, replaced one deteriorated culvert, and the gravel surfacing of the West Monroe and Columbia ring levees was completed. The final structures are currently under contract. In FY 98, the replacement and/or rehabilitation of the remaining deteriorated drainage structures were essentially completed. Item 1 of the Bastrop to Monroe Levee enlargement is scheduled to be advertised in FY 99. 8. OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA Location. Improvements comprising comprehensive projects are on main stem Ouachita River, AR and LA, on its tributaries, Caddo and Little Missouri Rivers, and in Pine Bluff, AR. Description of Ouachita River Basin is presented in greater detail on page 690 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The authorized general plan for flood control and other purposes in the Ouachita River Basin includes the projects listed in Table 12-E. The 1966 Flood Control Act modified the Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, AR and LA, project to include 10 water-retention lakes in the western tributaries of Bayou Bartholomew in Arkansas and 6 local levee units along the main stem of the bayou in Louisiana. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed features of comprehensive project. (See individual statements for further details.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations for Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, DeGray Lake, Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, and Ouachita River Levees are shown in individual reports in 1985. Condition as of Sep. 30. Pertinent data on those features which are complete or not started are in Table 12-E. Conditions of Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, DeGray Lake, and Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson are given in the individual reports in 1985 report. Reconnaissance studies of flooding problems in Ouachita Parish, LA, were initiated in January 1994. Study efforts are concentrating on the developing urban area around Monroe, LA. The reconnaissance report, completed in January 1995, recommended a feasibility study be conducted on flood reduction for the River Styx Bayou area under authority of Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. The study addressed alternative sized pumping stations. The final Detailed Project Report was completed in November 1995. Plans and specifications for the project are essentially complete and the contract will be advertised upon completion of the right-of-way acquisition by the Project Sponsor. Planning and design for the Youngs Bayou Project are still on hold due to the Sponsor's inability to participate in the project. 9. PEARL RIVER BASIN, MS AND LA Location. The basin comprises most of the South-central portion of Mississippi and a small part of southeast Louisiana. The Pearl River begins in Neshoba County, MS, and flows southwesterly 113 miles to the vicinity of Jackson, MS, then southeasterly 233 miles to the vicinity of Bogalusa, LA. At that point, the Pearl River splits into the East and West Pearl Rivers, and flows southerly 44 and 12-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 48 miles, respectively, before entering the Rigolets and Lake Borgne. Existing projects. The Jackson-East Jackson Flood Control Project provides for improvements of the Pearl River at Jackson, MS. This project includes two levee systems totaling 13.2 miles in length, with two pumping stations, four gated outlets, and 18.9 miles of channel rectification including three cutoffs with a total length of 2.2 miles in the Pearl River. This project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of Jul. 14, 1960. Construction began in July 1964 and work was completed in FY 68. Total Federal cost of the project was $7,190,200. The FY 83 Jobs Bill authorized extension of the Jackson-East Jackson West Bank levee system along the Fortification Street I-55 exit. This extension was initiated and completed in FY 84. Public Law 98-63, dated Jul. 29, 1983, authorized the vicinity of Jackson project. This authority provided for additional measures to prevent recurring flood damages along the Pearl River at Jackson and included 3.3 miles of floodway clearing and enlarging the opening at the Highway 25 Bridge. This work has been completed. Mitigation lands for the clearing were purchased by the local sponsor in May 1985 and the Corps has reimbursed the local sponsor to cover the cost of these lands. Total Federal cost of this project is $1,800,000. Authorized projects. Public Law 99-88, date-d Aug. 15, 1985, authorized planning, design, engineering, and construction of a levee system in Slidell, LA, to protect 3,265 residential and commercial structures from floods in the West Pearl. Public Law 99-662, dated Nov. 17, 1986, authorized construction of Shoccoe Dam and various flood control measures for Carthage-Leake County, MS. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 12-6 of the FY 92 report. Condition as of Sep. 30. An overall basin study is essentially complete, except for alternative studies to Shoccoe Dry Dam as discussed below. Flood control feasibility studies for Jackson, MS, recommending Shoccoe Dam, and for Slidell, LA, recommending a 15-mile levee system, have been completed. Detailed engineering and design studies were on hold for the Slidell levee system, due to the failure of a local funding referendum. As a result of upstream opposition, Shoccoe Dam is not implementable. In response to a request by the local sponsor, the Pearl River Basin Development District, reconnaissance studies to evaluate alternatives to Shoccoe for flood damage reduction in the Jackson Metropolitan Area have been completed and a potentially feasible levee plan identified. A Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement was signed with the Local Sponsor on Sep. 25, 1991. The feasibility studies focused on a comprehensive levee system and other flood control measures across the basin to reduce damages associated with flooding from the Pearl River. The Feasibility Study is scheduled for completion in June 1998. Studies of various flood control measures for Carthage-Leake County, Columbia and Picayune, MS; Bogalusa, LA, and the Bogue Chitto Subbasin have been completed. None were found economically feasible. We are currently coordinating with the NRCS to identify other feasible projects in the basin. Navigation studies have been conducted on the East and West Pearl Rivers. Results of these studies indicate that maintenance necessary to reopen the existing West Pearl River navigation project is economically justified. The final EIS was filed with EPA in March 1994. Studies indicate that the West Pearl River Navigation Project is economically justified, engineeringly feasible, and in the overall public interest. Maintenance dredging was to resume in the spring of 1995; however, the Corps was enjoined from dredging until a trial could be held in Federal court. At present, litigation has been stated and the court has retained jurisdiction until the Corps is prepared to initiate dredging and notified the court. This notification could take place when the record of decision is signed and the Corps is ready in all other aspects to initiate dredging. The NEPA process is not complete; therefore, dredging of the West Pearl River will not occur in 1999. Studies also indicate that the East Pearl River does not have sufficient existing flows to support a 7- to 9-foot-deep navigation channel. The navigation study for Port Bienville, MS, has been terminated due to withdrawal of the Hancock County Port and Harbor Commission as local sponsor. Reconnaissance studies of flow distribution between the West Pearl River and the East Pearl River (boundary between the States of Louisiana and Mississippi) in the Lower Basin have been completed. A water resources development plan for flow redistribution in the Lower Basin was found economically feasible. However, the primary benefit of the plan would accrue to recreation. Reconnaissance studies did not find any problem that would be solved by a Federal project, given the current policies and priorities of the Administration. Investigations of low flow conditions in the Walkiah Bluff area were initiated in FY 95 under authority of Section 307(d) of WRDA 90. A detailed project report was completed in May 1997 which recommended a 50-50 low-flow distrubution (50 percent down Wilson 12-6 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT Slough and 50 percent down the Pearl River). Preparation of plans and specifications for this project are underway. Reconnaissance studies of flood damage prevention and erosion control along Caney Creek in Jackson, MS, have been completed. These studies indicated that flood damages attributable to headwater flooding from Caney Creek are relatively insignificant and will not economically justify a water resource improvement plan under current conditions. Studies also found that most of the more serious streambank erosion problems along the creek have been corrected through actions undertaken by other public entities and agencies. 10. PEARL RIVER, SLIDELL, ST. TAMMANY PARISH, LA Location. The project is located in the southeastern portion of the State of Louisiana and consists of the area bounded by the West Pearl River on the east, Interstate 10 on the west, and Lake Pontchartrain on the south. Authorized project. The project is broken into two segments of levees. The segment north of I-10 will consist of 4.0 miles of levee, a pumping station, a floodgate structure, and minor drainage structures. This levee will protect the Slidell area north of I-10 from flooding associated with a 200-year hydrological event on the Pearl River. The segment south of I-10 will consist of 9.0 miles of levees, three pumping stations, floodgates, and minor drainage structures. This levee will protect the Slidell area south of I-10 from flooding associated with a 200-year hydrological event on the Pearl River and provides the same level of protection against hurricane surges. These two levee segments total 13 miles of levee and would protect some 3,029 homes. Estimated Federal cost is $28,437,000. Estimated non-Federal cost is $9,479,000. Local cooperation. The project sponsor, St. Tammany Levee Board, and the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works), in an agreement consistent with the Fiscal Year 1985 Supplemental Appropriation Act Public Law 99-88) and Senate Report 1567, signed the Local Cooperation Agreement Jun. 30, 1986. The 1997 Louisiana Regular Legislative Session abolished the St. Tammany Levee District. Operations and results during fiscal year. This project is on hold pending identification of a source of non-Federal funding. Condition as of Sep. 30. Completed resolution of comments on the General Design Memorandum for north levee only. Preparation of plans and specifications is on hold pending identification of a sponsor for the project. No construction has taken place. 11. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (VICKSBURG DISTRICT) Location. On Red River and its tributaries below Denison Dam, in Oklahoma, Arkansas, Texas, and Louisiana. (Refer to Geological Survey State maps and folio "Maps of Red River" - 1958 edition.) Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1946 approved general plan for flood control on Red River below Denison Dam, TX and OK, which provides for construction of six flood control reservoirs in combination with existing or authorized Federal and non-Federal levee improvements, modified as required, and channel stabilization at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. This act further authorized incorporation of several separate existing projects for flood damage prevention along Red River below Denison, above jurisdiction of the MRC, into this project. By Public Law 780, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess., as amended by Public Law 218, 84th Cong., 1st sess., and Public Law 645, 86th Cong., I1st sess., plan of improvement was amended to include additional projects as indicated in following lists of reservoirs and local protection works considered in general flood control plan for the Red River below Denison Dam, and existing flood control projects incorporated into project in Vicksburg District. (See Table 12-F for new projects and Table 12-G for incorporated projects.) Local cooperation. See individual reports herein. 12. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM, LEVEES AND BANK STABILIZATION (VICKSBURG DISTRICT) Location. Along the main stem of the Red River from the head of the levee system immediately above Index, AR, through the southwest corner of Arkansas to the vicinity of Boyce, LA, on the right bank, and Pineville, LA. on the left bank. Existing project. Raising and strengthening existing and authorized Red River levees to provide protection against flooding and bank protection works 12-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. The plan consists of raising and strengthening existing and authorized Red River levees to provide against a flood approximately 20 percent greater than the flood of 1945, the flood of record, as modified by authorized reservoirs. Bank protection works are to be constructed at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. Estimated cost for new work (October 1998) is $83,609,000 Federal and $5,391,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-10 of FY 1984 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor forces continued investigations, surveys, and preparation of plans and specifications. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in February 1948 and the levee and bank stabilization are complete with the exception of levee rehabilitation within the state of Arkansas. Construction was completed on the rehabiliation of levee Item 2 in Arkansas, and initiation on Item 3. Construction of the Twelve-Mile Bayou Revetment Capout was initiated. 13. WEST AGURS, LA, LEVEE Location. The West Agurs, LA, Levee is located in Caddo Parish in northwestern Louisiana, immediately adjacent to the northern corporate limits of Shreveport. Existing Project. The West Agurs levee was constructed by local interests in 1961 and incorporated into the Federal project Red River Below Denison Dam Project in 1983. The levee extends from U.S. Highway 71 at the north end of the area to the Texas and Pacific Railroad at the lower end, a distance of approximately 3 miles. In addition to the levee, appurtenant interior drainage works include a borrow pit channel at an approximate bottom elevation of 150.0 feet NGVD, a 55 CFS pumping station, and one 10- by 10-foot floodgate. The entire system was designed to protect the 700-acre West Agur area from Twelve Mile Bayou headwater and Red River backwater flooding. Total Federal cost is $0. Local Cooperation. The Caddo Levee District completed levee improvements consisting of a temporary ponding area required for the levees to be incorporated into the Federal project in 1983. The West Agur levee was incorporated into the Federal system in 1983. Operation and maintenance of the levee is the responsibility of the Caddo Levee District. Condition as of Sep 30. Studies of flooding problems in the West Agur area were initiated in March 1997 under the authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act as amended. Draft report completed in December 1998 recommends an additional 55 cfs pump to provide flood protection to commercial and industrial properties located within the leveed area. The study will be completed in FY 99. 14. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed work was accomplished at a cost of $290,860 for the fiscal year. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1998, is $4,899,970. 15. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) FY 98 costs for the period were $409,948 for disaster preparedness. Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in the interest of flood control (Sec. 208 of 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Cong.) No activity during the period. Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1956 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Cong.) Total FY costs for emergency bank protection work was $183,187. This included work on U.S. Highway 65, East Carroll Parish, LA, $24,291, non-Federal. Big Black River, U.S. Highway 51 Bridge, $141,172, federal and $63,733, non-Federal; Clear Creek, Warren County, MS, $36,368; and Coordination Account Funds $4,957. Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). Boeuf-Tensas Basin, $29,295; Ouachita Parish River Styx, LA, $32,701, Twelve Mile Bayou $54,098 Camden, AR $64,532; Coordination Account Funds 12-8 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT $6,732; $14,497 non-Federal on Ouachita Parish Police; and Red Chute Bayou, LA, $46,006. 16. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Project modifications for improvement of environment pursuant to Sec. 1135, Public Law 99-662, as amended (preauthorization). During the FY, $17,125 was expended on initial appraisals; $7,926 on Coordination Account Funds; $37,501 on Lake Whittington Weir, MS, $59,101 on Catahoula, Lake, LA; $219,661 on Lake George, MS; $85,638 on Little Tallahatchie River above Sardis Lake, MS; $3,407 on Sulphur River, AR; and $4,485 on Frasier Whitehead Oxbow, LA. Total costs for Section 1135 was $434,844. Project modifications for improvement of environmental pursuant to Section 307(d), Public Law 102-580. During the FY, $1,906,884 was expended on Pearl River, Walkiah Bluff, MS and LA. Aquatic Restoration pursuant to Section 206, P.L. 104-303. During FY 98, $3,483 was expended on Coordination Account Funds. 17. CATASTROPHIC DISASTER PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM During FY 98, $13,684 was expended on Local Preparation; $96,087 on National Preparedness, and $4,701 on National Emergency Facilities. Total costs for FY 98 was $114,472. 18. GENERAL REGULATORY PROGRAM During FY 98, $1,717,673 was expended on Permit Evaluation, and $512,246 on Enforcement. A total of $2,229,919 was expended in FY 98. 12-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 12-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 98 Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR (6.5-foot navigation project) New Work Approp.$ Cost -- $ 5,248,6191 -- 5,248,6191 1. Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR (9-foot navigation project) 2. Red River Emergency Bank Protection (Contrib. Funds) 3. Red River Waterway Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA (Contrib. Funds) 5. Aloha- Rigolette, LA 6. Contrib. Funds (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost -- 30,000 453,099 111,076 -- 230,609,2512 -- 230,110,2342 6,722,000 6,795,000 8,698,000 6,919,000 139,337,103 6,968,452 6,834,260 8,646,907 6,646,737 138,820,401 6,000,000 6,600,000 6,000,000 2,700,965 7,831,332 8,451,252 -- 65,008,000 2,222,056 64,163,140 6,825 6,825 24,219,000 18,990,200 8,904,000 15,487,000 1,306,331,200 60,679,112 19,445,126 4,921,367 11,354,810 1,297,924,828 7,096,000 7,222,000 9,167,000 12,033,000 80,605,791 7,267,016 7,265,615 9,051,268 12,049,231 79,456,743 1,265,077 674,929 5,067,552 587,352 4,879,967 168,000 271,800 1,814,000 1,418,000 5,752,800 265,775 319,174 1,518,306 1,195,331 5,229,404 400,000 427,277 32,553 12-10 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 98 7. Ouachita River Levees, LA 9. Pearl River Vicinity of Jackson, MS Pearl River Walkiah Bluff (Contrib. Funds) 10. Pearl River, Slidell, St. Tammany Parish, LA 11. Red River below Denison Dam Levees and Bank Stabilization (Vicksburg District) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 4,500,000 2,300,000 5,456,388 2,790,774 2,000,000 176,327 95,000 2,563,294 -- 24,463,758 1,306,715 22,265,734 -- 2,080,000 -- 2,079,999 -- -- 2,000,000 4,000,000 572,763 293,276 1,906,884 2,949,250 748,000 388,000 156,000 141,000 2,636,500 791,623 392,018 152,834 136,000 2,538,968 -- 1,292,554 -- 702,985 -- -20,000 14,356 1,089 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,206,193 756,231 3,586,000 3,682,404 -- 939,000 76,400,000 681,346 1,362,608 73,796,470 Natchez Bluff (Contrib. Funds) -- 4,500,000 4,000,000 8,500,000 -- 631,071 766,414 1,397,485 New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 600,000 99,750 12-11 1. Includes $674,068 for new work on previous projects. 2. Includes $3,312,000 PL 98-8 Jobs Bill. Excludes $47,854,000 previously allocated to New Orleans District. 3. Excludes New Orleans District allocation and cost. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 12-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Dec. 31, 1970 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 18, 1941 Oct. 27, 1965 OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS BELOW CAMDEN, AR (See Section 1 of Text) Modification of existing project to provide for 9-foot channel and deepening canal to Felsenthal, AR. Modification of 9-foot project to provide four new locks and dams and channel improvements. Migratory waterfowl refuges on Bayou D'Arbonne in connection with the pool of the Columbia Lock and Dam and in the pool of the Felsenthal Lock and Dam. RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION (See Section 2 of Text). Realining the banks by dredging cut-offs and training works and stabilizing banks by means of revetments and dikes. RED RIVER WATERWAY-MISSISSIPPI RIVER TO SHREVEPORT, LA (See Section 3 of Text) Develop a 9 by 200 feet, approximately 236 miles long from Mississippi River at junction of Old River via Old River and Red River to Shreveport, LA, consisting of realinement, bank stabilization, and construction five locks and dams. ALOHA-RIGOLETTE AREA, LA (See Section 5 of Text) Original author incorporated into RRBW Protection FCA 1946 project modified to provide Bayou Darrow outlet. BAYOU BODCAU AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA Extend Cypress Bayou-Red Chute Bayou levee, construct stream closure landside drainage channel and three culverts on Red Chute Bayou and clearing and snagging channel; extend Flat River-Loggy Bayou levee, close Flat River near junction with Cutoff Bayou, and construct control structures on Flat River near junction with Red Chute Bayou; and enlarge Flat River channel to 20 to 35 feet, a distance of 11.6 miles. CANAL 43, AR Channel enlargement Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended Authorized by Chief of Engineers, October 31, 1988. CANEY CREEK, MS Authorizes construction of such bank stabilization measures for Caney Creek in the vicinity of Jackson, MS, between McDowell Road and Raymond Road as the Secretary determines necessary for flood damage prevention and erosion control along approximately 3,000 feet of the creek. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. 12-12 S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 112, 86th Cong., 2d sess. Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Nov. 25, 1970, and H. Doc. 92-109, 92d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 101- 101 Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 203, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Jun. 30, 1948 Nov. 17,1986 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Water Resources Development Act of 1996 Jun. 30, 1948 as amended NATCHEZ BLUFFS, MS Authorizes bluff stabilization in accordance with the Natchez Bluff study at a total cost of $17,200,000, estimated federal cost of $12,900,000 and non federal cost of $4,300,000. CHAUVIN BAYOU, LA Construction of a 250-cfs pumping plant located adjacent to Chauvin Bayou at the Ouachita River levee and a water control structure in Canal L-11. Public Law 104-303 Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers Feb. 6, 1990. LEAD BAYOU, MS Channel enlargement. Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Jun. 10, 1980. MCKINNEY BAYOU, AR AND TX (See Section 6 of text) Authorizes a comprehensive study and recommendations for development and efficient utilization of water and related resources for the McKinney Bayou area, a tributary of Red Water. MONROE AND WEST MONROE, LA, AND OUACHITA PARISH, LA Authorizes such structural and nonstructural measures as the Secretary deems feasible to prevent flood damage to the cities of Monroe and West Monroe, LA, and Ouachita Parish, LA. OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA (See Section 8 of Text) Authorized DeGray Lake; Murfreesboro Lake; extension of floodwall at Monroe to partially close the existing gap; local protection at Bawcomville, LA (subsequently constructed under Sec. 6, Act of May 15, 1928, with local interests contributing one third of cost); Bayou Bartholomew channel improvement, including Deep Bayou and Overflow Creek; Pine Bluff local protection; local protection at Calion, AR; and incorporation, into the Ouachita River and Tributaries project, of all existing projects and portions thereof in the basin above the lower end of the levees on the east bank of the Ouachita River. In addition, the Chief of Engineers authorized on Nov. 14, 1966, additional work on the levees. Public Law 98-63 98th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. 12-13 Jun. 30, 1948, as amended Jul. 29, 1983 Nov. 17, 1986 May 17, 1950 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 12-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 14, 1960 Jun. 13, 1983 Jul. 29, 1983 Aug. 15, 1985 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 30, 1948, as amended Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 28, 1990 Water Resources Development Act of 1996 PEARL RIVER, MS AND LA (See Section 9 of Text) Construction of levee system and channel rectification, Pearl River, vicinity of Jackson, MS Accomplish the clearing and channel improvements at Hwy 25 bridge on the Pearl River in the vicinity of Jackson, MS. Design and construct protection to prevent flooding along the Pearl River in the vicinity of Jackson, MS Planning, design, engineering, and construction of a levee system for Slidell, LA, pending binding cost-sharing arrangements acceptable to the Secretary of the Army or under terms and conditions provided in subsequent legislation when enacted into law. Authorizes the Pearl River Basin, including Shoccoe, MS, for the construction of the Shoccoe Dam plus upstream flood control measures at east-central Leake County, south part of Carthage, MS, Highway 35 vicinity, upstream reservoirs on the Pearl River and upstream channels on the Pearl River and elsewhere in Leake County. PEARL RIVER, SLIDELL, ST. TAMMANY PARISH, LA (See Section 10 of Text) Authorizes flood control improvements for Pearl River Basin, St. Tammany, LA, subject to a favorable Chiefs report and approval by the Secretary of the Army for Civil Works. PORTER BAYOU, MS Selective snagging and clearing of Porter Bayou, MS, from mile 12.5 to mile 32.3 RED RIVER WATERWAY, LA (See Section 11 of Text) Water Resources Development of 1986 authorized for construction the project for mitigation of wildlife losses, Red River Waterway, LA, which may include all or such portion of any land adjacent to the Loggy Bayou Wildlife Management Area. Water Resources Development Act of 1990 modified the mitigation project to authorize the Secretary to acquire an additional 12,000 acres adjacent to or close to the Bayou Bodcau Wildlife Management Area. WRDA 96 modified the mitigation project to authorize the Secretary to acquire lands adjacent to Loggy Bayou Wildlife Management Area in Caddo and Red River Parishes and increasing the authorized cost to $10,500,000. H. Doc. 441, 86th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 153, 98th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 98-63, 98th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 99-88, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 99-662 99th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 18, 1982. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 101-640, 101st Cong., 2d sess. Section 301, Public Law 104-303 12-14 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Water Resources WRDA 96 modified the project to include dredging of the entrance Section 301, Public Development to the Oxbow Lakes designated for preservation in project Law 104-303 Act of 1996 documentation and stated that the cost sharing for this dredging should be the same as the general navigation features. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM LEVEES AND BANK STABILIZATION (VICKSBURG DIST.) (See Section 12 of Text) Jul. 24, 1946 Levee and bank stabilization. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Aug. 13, 1968 Deauthorization of Morringsport Dam and Reservoir on H. Doc. 304, Cypress Creek; realining and stabilizing the banks of the 90th Cong., 2d sess. Red River; and recreational facilities from the Mississippi River to Denison Dam, OK and TX. RED RIVER WATERWAY-SHREVEPORT, LA, TO INDEX, AR Aug. 13, 1968 Provides for realinement of the channels of the Red River H. Doc. 304, from Shreveport, LA, to Index, AR. 90th Cong., 2d sess. 12-15 TABLE 12-C OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS, AR AND LA (9-FOOT PROJECT), LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Min. Depth Greatest on Available Lower Miles Length Max. Elev. Miter Above Width for Full Lift Normal Still at Miles Mouth of Width at Pool Normal Per- Total from of Lock of Lock Low Surface Pool Character cent Estimated Nearest Black Chamber Chamber Water (feet Level or Kind of Type of Com- Project Location Town River (feet) (feet) (feet) msl) (feet) Foundation Dam Construction plete Cost Jonesville, LA , Columbia, LA Felsenthal, AR Calion, AR (H. K. Thatcher) 10 25 84 600 5 117 84 600 1 227 7 283 84 600 84 600 30 34 14 Piling Moving Tainter gated dam; bascule gated navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates 18 52 13 do do Tainter gated dam; fixed crest navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates 18 70' 13 Earth do Tainter gated dam; hinged crest gated navigation pass; steel mitering lock 12 77 13 do gates. do Tainter gated dam; hinged crest gated navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates. 1002 $ 43,585,000 952 882 882 46,235,000 102,161,000 71,019,000 Estimated Federal Cost Estimated Non-Federal Cost Total Estimated Cost 1. Fish and wildlife impoundment level. Navigation pool elevation 65. 2. The percent complete reflects all work within the pool. d O 0e aa t 0 0z O 70 0 oo $263,000,000 18,009,000 281,009,000 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1998 Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Bayou Bartholomew, LA and AR 1,2,3,4 Bayous D'Arbonne and Corney, LA' ,24' Big Black River, MS L,4'5 Big Sunflower River, MS4'6,'7 Boeuf River, LA1'3'4,7 ,8'9 Claiborne County Port, MS Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, TX, and Shreveport, LA'" Homochitto River, MS4 Lake Providence Harbor, LA Little Missouri River, AR"4',5 Little River, LAIl,4,5,' Little Tallahatchie River, MS"' 7 Madison Parish Port, LA Mouth of Yazoo River, MS"' 7 ' " Ouachita and Black Rivers, AR and LA, Felsenthal Canal Overton-Red River Waterway, LA Pearl River, MS Red River below Fulton, AR"'6 "7 '8 Red Rive, Waterway LA, AR, OK, and TX"'7." 8 Red River Waterway, Shreveport, LA to Daingerfield, TX' Removings snags and wrecks from Mississippi River below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers" Rosedale Harbor, MS Saline River, AR ',34'' 5 Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers, MS,4,5 Tensas River and Bayou Macon, LA "s8'"3 Yalobusha River, MS ',4,5,14 -- 1931 -- 1941 -- 1895 -- 1942 -- 1949 -- 1985 Complete 1971 -- 1910 -- 1985 -- 1873 -- 1890 -- 1913 -- 1985 -- 1953 -- 193712 -- 1985 -- 1985 -- 1978 -- 1969 -- 1976 -- 1948 -- 1985 -- 1931 -- 1939 -- 1949 -- 1937 12-17 $ 45,874 19,000 15,000 560,027 30,000 2,000,000 202,817 15,482 208,537 19,992 1,500 19,000 656,000 1,179,211 8,562,908 1,963,806 $ 42,857 37,804 -- 459,328 103,737 607,235 452,611 8,518 5,441,983 -- -- -- 960,369 948,342 4,387,192 3,498,242 2,147,890 Dec. 1983 Dec. 1914 Nov. 1963 Dec. 1980 ' 1956 ! 150,800 Sep. 1978 1 2,000,000 26,900 43,481 38,367 7,000 272,500 5,308,691 12,792 173,066 85,352 15,936 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 12-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (Continued) For Last Cost to Sep. 1998 Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Yazoo River, MS -- 1987 9,341,826 1,209,895 1 Yellow Bend Port, AR Complete 1991 3,793,069 623,188 Aug. 1991 1. Status and Date unavailable. 2. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 1962, 64th Cong., 2d sess., and H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 3. Channels adequate for existing commerce. 4. Inactive project. No commerce. 5. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 6. Project curtailment recommended by elimination of work between Pentecost and mouth of Hushpuckena River. (Abandonment of entire project erroneously recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.) 7. See report of Mississippi River Commission for operations in connection with Yazoo Basin. 8. Report of New Orleans District, pp. 919-920 for Fiscal Year 1949. 9. Project curtailment recommended by elimination of work above Girard, LA. (Abandonment of entire project recommended erroneously in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.) 10. Due to decline of traffic, local interests not sufficiently interested to provide rights-of-way and dumping privileges. 11. No additional funds available under this project. Work is being carried on under appropriation flood control, Mississippi River and tributaries. 12. Year authorized. 13. Inactive. Channel adequate for commerce. 14. See report of Mississippi River Commission for operations in connection with Yazoo Basin flood control project including channel clearing and rectification and Grenada Lake on Yalobusha River. 15. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds. 16. Includes $1,553,878 for previous projects. 17. Incorporated in the project "Red River Waterway-Mississippi River Shreveport, LA" Sept. 30, 1976. 18. Emergency bank protection on this project is reported separately as "Red River Emergency Bank Protection." Two reaches, "Red River Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA" and "Red River Waterway-Shreveport, LA, Daingerfield, TX," are also reported separately. 19. Includes $674,068 for new work on previous projects. 12-18 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-E OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES: EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 10 of Text) For Last Estimated Full Report Federal See Annual New Work Project Report for: Cost Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, AR 1985 $ 44,100,000 DeGray Lake, AR 1985 72,034,0002 Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, AR 1985 20,900,000 Calion, AR 1960 970,9963 Columbia, LA 1941 204,7403 Existing levees and extensions thereto from Bastrop, LA, to mouth of Boeuf River and at West Monroe, LA 1961 3,025,1813 Little Missouri River below Murfreesboro, AR 1957 354,8023 Ozan Creek, AR 1957 57,7423 Terre Noire Creek, AR 1948 123,7003 Pine Bluff, AR, local protection 1954 172,5823 Monroe, LA, floodwall extension (Plan B) 1984 2,561,0003 Ouachita River Levees (additional work) (1) 9,400,000 Total $153,904,7434 1. 2. 3. 4. See individual reports herein. Includes $5,800,000 for water supply to be reimbursed by local interests. Actual cost of completed project. Excludes the authorized Murfreesboro Lake, AR, project, which is inactive. The latest estimated cost (1954) was $4,190,000. 12-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 12-F RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (VICKSBURG DISTRICT): NEW PROJECTS (See Sec. 13 of Text) Drainage Conserva- Flood Area tion Control Estimated (square Storage (acre- Federal Project Stream miles) (acre-feet) feet) Cost Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, AR2 and LA -- 1,158 -- -- $25,100,0003 Bayou Nicholas-Coushatta, LA -- -- -- -- 70,7174 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA5 -- -- -- -- 243,3363 Caddo Lake, LA' Caddo Lake -- -- -- 3,586,000 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA Red River -- -- -- 1,950,0003 Garland City, AR"6 -- -- -- -- 1,450,0003 Maniece Bayou, AR -- -- -- -- 970,0323 McKinney Bayou, AR7'8 -- -- -- -- 5,610,0003 Posten Bayou, AR and LA2'6 '9 -- -- -- -- 560,000 Red River below Denison Dam levees and bank stabilization, TX, AR, and LA 3' -- -- -- -- 66,775,0003 Total 99,191,885 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Details presented in individual report herein. Construction on this project not started. In addition, non-Federal funds are: Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, AR and LA .................... Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA (cash contribution) ....... Caddo Lake, LA ...................................... Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA ................ East Point ........... ...................... Garland City, AR ....................................... Maniece Bayou, AR (cash contribution) ....................... McKinney Bayou, AR (cash contribution) ...................... $5,300,000 89,047 28,000 480,000 67,000 6,000 18,000 508,000 Red River below Denison Dam, levees and bank stabilization, TX, AR, and LA .................... 1,560, For last full report, see Annual Report for 1964. For last full report, see Annual Report for 1951. Inactive. Includes $4,330,200, Code 711, and $399,739 accelerated Public Work funds. Joint-use pool (sediment). Deauthorized by resolution Dec. 17, 1970, which also authorized new project "Posten Bayou, AR," under provision of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965. 000 12-20 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-G RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (VICKSBURG DISTRICT): INCORPORATED PROJECTS (See Sec. 13 of Text) For Last Flood Estimated Full Report Control Federal See Annual Project Type of Work Act Cost Report For: Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, LA Levee and appurtenances 1941 $ 1,653,237' 1956 Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA2 Flood-control reservoir 1938 5,120,740' 4 Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, LA Channel improvement 1941 319,200' 1948 Bayou Pierre, LA Channel enlargement 1936 255,529' Black Bayou Lake, LA5 '6 Flood-control reservoir 1936 714,000 1945 Colfax, Grant Parish, LA Cutoff 1938 70,348' 7 1938 Grant Parish, below Colfax, LA Levees 1938 38,809' 1941 Hempstead County levee district No.1, AR Levee enlargement 1938 88,006' 1941 Natchitoches Parish, LA Levee and appurtenances 1936 1,529,92718 1956 Pineville, Red River, LA Levee and appurtenances 1941 232,426' 1953 Red River in vicinity of Shreveport, LA Bank protection 1944 3,908,000' 1953 Red River Parish, LA Levee enlargement 1936 149,435' 1939 Saline Point, LA Cutoff 1936 124,1111 1945 Wallace Lake, LA Flood-control reservoir 1936 1,219,371'3 4 West Agurs, LA Levee and appurtenauces 1976 0 Total $15,467,134 1. Actual cost. 2. Project transferred to Vicksburg District, August 1982. 3. Includes amounts indicated for recreational facilities under Code 711, Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA, $1,027,000; Wallace Lake, LA, $17,164. 4. Included in this report. 5. Work not started. 6. Inactive. 7. Completed under provisions of Sec. 7 of Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended by Sec. 9 of Flood Control Act of 1936, and included in 1939 Annual Report of President, Mississippi River Commission, p. 2214. 8. In addition, $25,000 was expended from contributed funds. 12-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 12-H OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1998 Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, LA' 1956 $ 1,896,826 $ -- Apr. 1955 Bayou Bodceau and Tributaries AR and LA 1995 1,037,952 1,600,919 -- Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, LA' 1948 319,200 353,298 Jan. 1948 Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA 1985 -- 5,677,514 Apr. 1961 Bayou Pierre, LA 1985 -- 292,749 FY 1939 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA"2 1951 243,3362 -- Jun. 1939 Big Black River, MS3 1956 910,185 670,750 Big Choctaw Bayou, LA3' 1966 248,823 -- Black Bayou Reservoir, LA"5 '6 1945 -- -- -- Blakely Mt. Dam - Lake Ouachita, Ouachita River, AR 1985 34,023,108 95,361,634 Oct. 1955 Caddo Lake Dam, LA 1986 -- 1,807,781 -- Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA 1978 1,655,700 -- Jul. 1978 Canal 43, AR 1997 898,061 -- Aug. 1990 Chauvin Bayou, LA 1995 4,245,863 -- -- Colfax, Grant Parish, LA '7 1938 70,348 -- -- DeGray Lake Caddo River, AR 1985 72,033,992 67,330,153 Dec. 1971 East Point, LA 1969 286,069 3,051,536 Aug. 1968 Garland City, AR 1976 1,335,841 -- Jul. 1974 Grant Parish below Colfax, LA"3' 1941 38,809 -- Hempstead County Levee District No. 1, AR'3 1941 88,006 -- Homochitto River, MS3 1956 205,000 144,650 Maniece Bayou, AR"2 1970 970,9322 -- Aug. 1969 Monroe Floodwall, LA 1984 2,560,000 -- -- Murfreesboro Dam and Lake4 1951 -- -- -- Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Little Missouri River, AR 1985 16,516,689 66,632,468 May 1950 Natchez Port Area, MS3'4 1969 538,000 -- Natchitoches Parish, LA"2 1956 1,529,478 -- Aug. 1955 12-22 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-H OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD (Continued) CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1998 Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Pearl River, Jackson-East Jackson, MS 1986 2,790,127 -- 1987 Pineville, Red River, LA3'4 1953 232,426 -- Dec. 1951 Lead Bayou, MS 1991 1,961,089 -- Nov. 1988 Porter Bayou 1995 1,049,278 -- Sep. 1993 Posten Bayou, AR8 1973 -- -- -- Poverty Point, LA 1986 250,000 -- Oct. 1985 Red River Parish, LA"3 1939 149,435 -- Red River in vicinity of Shreveport, LA' 1953 3,908,000 -- Mar. 1953 Red River Waterway, 1994 855,497 -- -- Shreveport, LA to Index, LA9 Saline Point, LA' 3 1945 124,111 -- -- Twelvemile Bayou, LA4 1966 335,433 -- May 1965 Wallace Lake, LA 1985 -- 2,019,300 Dec. 1946 1. Authorized under project "Red River Below Denison Dam." 2. In addition, the following was expended from contributed funds: Amite River and tributaries .......................................................... $ 430 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA ............................................... 89,047 Choctaw Bayou and Tributaries, LA ................................................... 170,799 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA ............................................... 425,209 M aniece Bayou, AR ................................................... ......... 39,293 Natchitoches Parish, LA ............................................................ 250,000 3. Completion Date Unavailable. 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Sec. 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 5. Construction not initiated. 6. Inactive. 7. Completed under provisions of Sec. 7 Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended by Sec. 9, Flood Control Act 1936, and included in 1939 Annual Report of President, Mississippi River Commission, p. 2214. 8. Posten Bayou Project, authorized by Senate and House Resolutions, Dec. 17 and 15, 1970, deleted the plan authorized by the Flood Control Act dated Aug. 3, 1955. 9. Excludes New Orleans District allocation and cost. 12-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 12-I DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contrib See Annual And Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Extended Exp Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, AR and LA 1990 May 17, 1950 974,000 -- S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Buffalo River, MS' 1940 Nov 1986 -- -- McKinney Bayou, Finn 19632 Aug 1977 -- -- Bayou Segment, AR 1. Deauthorized by Sec. 1002, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. 2. Date Authorized. 12-24 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-J ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3121) FY 98 COSTS Item and CWIS Number Federal Non-Federal Total SURVEYS (Category 100) Navigation Studies (110) Red River Navigation Study, S.W. Ark. - 010436 Subtotal Flood Damage Prevention (120) McKinney Bayou, AR and TX -75353 Wallace Lake, Lake - 010571 Subtotal Miscellaneous Activities (170) Interagency Water Resources (173) -14713 Special Investigations (171) -17250 North American Waterfowl Management Plan (175) -53904 Review of FERC Licenses (172) - 053857 Subtotal COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES AND NON FEDERAL INTERAGENCIES (180) Cooperation with other Water Resource Agencies-53907 Jackson Pearl RV Res Release - 028001 PAS - MS-Ross Barnett Operation Model - 28002 Subtotal TOTAL (Category 100) COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) Bartonville, TX/SS Las Cruces, NM - 83005 Flood Plain Management Services - 82030 Jemez Springs, NM/Waggoner County - 83006 Quick Response - 82045 Technical Services - 82040 Subtotal Hydrologic Studies (260) Hydrologic Studies (260) -53820 Subtotal TOTAL (Category 200) GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 97,660 97,660 97,660 97,660 650 650 58,395 58,395 59,045 59,045 24,922 24,922 14,981 14,981 4,239 4,239 594 594 44,736 44,736 1,934 1,934 992 992 1,984 15,402 17,397 32,799 18,328 18,389 36,717 219,769 18,389 238,158 5,865 5,865 14,958 14,958 43,354 43,354 5,922 5,922 45,263 45,263 115,362 115,362 9,896 9,896 9,896 9,896 125,258 125,258 $ 345,027 18,389 363,416 12-25 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT * This district comprises a portion of southeastern Missouri and southern Illinois, western portions of Kentucky and Tennessee, a small portion of northern Mississippi, and the northeastern portion of Arkansas; includes area embraced in drainage basins of eastern tributaries of the Mississippi River south of Ohio River Basin to Nonconnah and Horn Lake Creeks, inclusive, and those of western tributaries south of Little River diversion channel and Commerce, MO, including St. Francis River Basin and White River and tributaries below Peach Orchard Bluff, AR, on the right bank and below Augusta, AR, on the left bank; also includes left bank Mississippi River levee from vicinity of Memphis south to about mile 620, and right bank levees from Cape Girardeau, MO, to about mile 605. IMPROVEMENTS Page Flood Control (Cont.) 1. Navigation work under special authorization ..................... 13-1 Flood Control 2. Mayfield Creek, KY ............... 3. Inspection of completed flood control projects ........................ 4. Flood control work under special authorization ..................... 5. Ecosystem Restoration work under special authorization ............... 6. General Regulatory Program .......... Page 13-1 13-2 13-2 13-2 13-2 7. Catastrophic Disaster Preparedness Program ........................ 13-3 Tables Page Table 13-A Cost & Financial Statement ... 13-4 Table 13-B Authorizing Legislation ...... 13-4 Table 13-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................. 13-5 Table 13-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................. 13-6 Table 13-E Deauthorized Projects ....... 13-7 Table 13-F Active General Investigations .. 13-8 1. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 87-645, as amended. During this period, $25,646 was expended on Pemiscot County Harbor; $46,479 was expended on New Madrid County Harbor, MO; $51,161 was expended on Blytheville Harbor, AR; $49,159 on Northwest Tennessee Regional Harbor, TN; and $7,062 was expended on Northwest Tennessee Regional Harbor, TN. 2. MAYFIELD CREEK, KENTUCKY Location. Mayfield Creek is located in West Kentucky in Ballard, Carlisle and McCracken Counties. Project limits extend from the confluence of Mayfield Creek with the Mississippi River upstream 25 miles to near the Graves-McCracken County line. Existing project. The project was approved for construction on Sept. 26, 1991, under the authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. The project consists of selective clearing and snagging of debris and excavation of sediment deposits 13-1 Navigation Page REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 according to provisions contained in the Stream Obstruction Removal Guidelines. The project would provide a level of protection less than 1 year. However, positive drainage would be established and reduction in flood duration is accomplished. The estimated construction cost for the project is $4,090,000. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed with the Sponsor Chairman for The Mayfield Creek Coalition on Sept. 27, 1991. The sponsor is required to provide the lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations required for project construction and cash contribution sufficient to bring the non-Federal share to 25 percent of the total project cost. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction is completed on 20 miles of channel. Remaining work is scheduled for completion December 1996. 3. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspected completed projects at a cost of $189,515 in the period. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1998, was $2,919,298. This included in-depth inspection of projects. 4. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). During this period $10,802 was expended on Section 205 Coordination Account; $15,885 was expended on Main Ditch #8, Pemiscot Co. MO; on Little River Diversion, Dutchtown, MO; expenditures were $78,713 Federal and $1,283 non-Federal; $29,560 was expended on Scott City, MO. Emergency bank stabilization activities pursuant to Sec. 14, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., as amended. During FY 1998, $3,935 was expended on Section 14 Coordination Account; $20,336 was expended on Town Creek, Somerville, TN; $66,206 Federal and $28,866 non-Federal on Gray's Creek, Shelby County, TN; $103,581 Federal and $53,337 non-Federal on Loosahatchie Interceptor Sewer Shelby; $34,412 on Coon Creek, Lenox, TN; $9,430 on Cooper Creek, Cherry Valley Sewage Lago. Emergency flood control activities, Public Law 99, 84th Cong. Federal cost was $319,097 for disaster preparedness, and $4,296 for Rehabilitation in FY 98. Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in the interest of flood control (Sec. 208 of 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress). Costs incurred in FY 98 were: Hatchie River Alcorn/Tippah Counties Cypress Creek, McNairy City, TN Cross County Ditch, II-1, AR Cross County Ditch 11-2, AR Total Federal NonFederal $28,734 43,304 10,883 4,527 $48,45307 $48,451 5. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Project Modifications for improvement of environment pursuant to Sec. 1135, Public Law 99-662, as amended (preauthorization). During this period $210,786 was expended on Simmons Field Control Structure, Mississippi County, AR; $3,661 on Initial Appraisals; and $5,606 on Coordination Account Funds. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration, Public Law 104- 303, Sec. 206 During FY 98, $4,238 was expended on Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration. 6. GENERAL REGULATORY PROGAM Permit Evaluations Enforcement Total $ 837,818 245,308 $1,083,126 7. CATASTROPHIC DISASTER PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM Local Preparedness National Preparedness National Emergency Facilities Total $ 21,115 130,398 10,903 $162,415 13-2 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 13-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 1998 2. Mayfield Creek, New Work TN Approp. 971,400 150,000 272,000 -- 3,188,400 Cost 944,601 185,912 295,168 45,626 3,136,038 TABLE 13-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 24, 1946 Mayfield Creek, KY (See Sec. 2 of Text) Approved Sept. 26, 1991' as amended 1. Authorized under authority of Sec. 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. 13-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 13-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1998 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Caruthersville Harbor, MO 1984 $768,992 $ 4,167,742 Dec. 1980 Helena Harbor, AR 1984 90,847 7,549,610 Sep. 1963 Elvis Stahr Harbor, KY 1984 149,827 8,074,001 Jan. 1963 New Madrid Harbor, MO6 1984 196,373 1,848,273 Oct. 1970 Obion River, TN' 3 1911 28,716 -- -- Osceola Harbor, AR 1984 269,115 10,679,259 Nov. 1974 Removing snags and wrecks from Mississippi River below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers 4 1948 -- 318,833 4 White River, AR (below Newport) 1984 169,994 39,913,777 -- Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), TN 1984 586,500 13,676,506 1959 1. No commerce. 2. Existing project is for maintenance only. 3. Recommended for abandonment in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 4. Completion date not available. 5. No funds available under this project. Work being carried on under "Appropriation, Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries." 6. WRDA 92 (Section 102) modified authorization by directing the Secretary to assume responsibility for maintenance of New Madrid County Harbor constructed by non-Federal interest. 13-4 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 13-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1998 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Big Creek Canal, Millington, TN Bradford, TN Cottonwood Slough pumping plant, IL' Drinkwater Sewer, MO Dyersburg, TN' Dyersburg, TN (SW) Fletcher Creek at Memphis, TN Grays Creek Canal Shelby Co., TN Hatchie River, Alcorn Co., MS Humboldt, TN Memphis, Wolf River, and Nonconnah Creek, TN Millington, TN Mounds and Mound City, Ohio River Basin, IL3 Nixon Creek, TN' Nonconnah Blvd. Nonconnah Creek, TN Nonconnah Creek, Interceptor Sewer, Memphis, TN Nonconnah Creek at Perkins Street, Memphis, TN N. Second St., Memphis, TN (Wolf River Bridge) N. Second St. at Wolf River, Memphis, TN Plainview Road Bridge, Chester County, TN Quince Road Bridge, Memphis, TN Sandy Creek Jackson, TN St. Francis River Highway No. 90, AR Treasure Island, MO Turner Creek, Corinth, MS US Hwy 51, Nonconnah Creek, TN W. Hickman, Area, Hickman, KY 1977 1984 1964 1984 1962 1981 1993 1985 1987 1989 1960 1996 1955 1952 1983 1987 1993 1983 1991 1991 1993 1985 1985 1981 1987 1984 1983 $ 70,363 95,061 147,000 1,494,828 229,6492 1,820,869 421,898 155,280 85,200 1,141,407 11,141,199 830,898 1,132,704 62,821 249,999 259,000 830,781 249,999 367,012 124,954 156,565 238,000 161,000 861,528 100,600 369,200 1,674,180 -- Dec. 1983 -- Feb. 1964 -- Jun. 1980 -- Jun. 1962 -- Oct. 1976 -- Sept. 1991 -- Aug. 1985 -- Feb. 1986 -- Apr. 1988 -- May 1959 -- Dec. 1995 -- Oct. 19594 -- Dec. 1951 -- Nov. 1981 -- Dec. 1986 -- Feb. 1992 -- Sep. 1980 -- Jan. 1990 -- Sep. 1990 -- Jul. 1991 -- Dec. 1984 -- Sep. 1985 -- Mar. 1978 -- Mar. 1987 -- Mar. 1983 -- Oct. 1976 13-5 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Sec. 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 2. Includes $21,863 contributed funds. 3. Work being completed under Mississippi River and Tributaries project. 4. Exclusive of Cache River Pumping Station. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 13-E DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For: Deauthorized Expended Expended Big Creek and L'Anguille River, White River Basin, AR 1977 May 6, 81 -- -- Clarendon to Laconia Circle White River Basin, AR 1937 May 6, 81 -- -- Huntingdon, TN 1983 Sep 80 2,900,281 -- Long Lake Area, Helena, AR 1983 Jul 83 61,281 -- Memphis Harbor, Memphis, TN -- Nov 29, 95 -- -- 13-6 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 13-F ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 98 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations (171) -17250 $10,709 Intra Agency Water Resources Development-14713 32,643 North American Waterfowl Mgmt (176) - 53904 3950 47,302 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Dept. of Agriculture (181) - 77067 $1,302 $1,302 TOTAL (Category (100) $48,604 COLLECTIONS AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Mgmt Services - 082030 $13,676 Technical Services - 082040 58,900 Quick Responses - 082045 2,196 SS Marion, AR - 083125 194 SS Aubrey, AR - 083126 $8,031 TOTAL (Category 200) $82,997 Preconstruction Engineering and Design (Category 600) White River to Newport, AR - 060740 424,265 TOTAL (Category 600) 424,265 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $555,866 13-7 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT * This district comprises those portions of southwestern Illinois and eastern Missouri which lie in the drainage basin of Mississippi River and its western tributaries, exclusive of the Missouri River, from the mouth of the Ohio River to mile 300, and of its eastern tributaries to Hamburg Bay at mile 261 on the left bank, exclusive of tributary basin of Illinois Waterway upstream of new La Grange Lock and Dam at mile 80.15 above confluence of the Illinois and Mississippi Rivers. The St. Louis District territory encompasses Navigation 1. Illinois Waterway, IL (St. Louis Dist.) ... 2. Mississippi River between Missouri and Minneapolis, MN (St. Louis Dist.) (Includes Melvin Price Locks & Dam) ... 3. Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers, MO and IL .......... 4. St. Louis Harbor, MO and IL ......... 5. Navigation work under special authorization ..................... Flood Control 6. Alton to Gale Organized Levee Districts, IL & MO ................. 7. Cape Girardeau-Jackson, MO ......... 8. East St. Louis and vicinity, IL......... 9. Meramec River Basin (Valley Park), M O ........................... 10. Nutwood Drainage and Levee District, IL ...................... 11. Ste. Genevieve, MO ................ 12. Inspection of completed flood control projects ................... 13. Flood control work under special authorization ..................... Miscellaneous 14. Ecosystem restoration work under special authorization ............... 27,000 square miles. The District also includes a drainage basin in Missouri tributary to the Little River diversion channel. The Mississippi River between the Missouri River and mile 300 is included in a separate report on the Mississippi River between the Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN. The portion of the Illinois River downstream of new La Grange Lock and Dam is included in the report of the Chicago District on the Illinois Waterway, Illinois and Indiana. IMPROVEMENTS Page Miscellaneous (Cont.) 14-2 15. General Regulatory Functions ......... 16. Catastrophic Disaster Preparedness Program ........................ 14-2 17. Other Programs and Activities ......... 14-2 14-3 Page 14-6 14-6 14-6 Multiple-Purpose Project Including Power 18. Upper Mississippi River Environmental 14-3 Management Program .............. 19. Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) ................ 14-6 14-7 Tables 14-3 14-4 Table 14-A Cost and Financial 14-4 Statement ............... 14-8 Table 14-B Authorizing Legislation ...... 14-10 14-5 Table 14-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................. 14-15 14-5 Table 14-D Other Authorized Flood 14-5 Control Projects............ 14-16 Table 14-E Deauthorized Projects ....... 14-18 14-6 Table 14-F Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ............. 14-20 14-6 Table 14-G Active General Investigations (96X3121) .... 14-21 14-6 14-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Navigation 1. ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL (ST. LOUIS DISTRICT) See report on Illinois Waterway, IL and IN, under Rock Island District. 2. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN (ST. LOUIS DISTRICT) See separate section entitled "Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN," printed in the Annual Report of the Chief of Engineers. This section includes Lock & Dam 24 Major Rehabilitation, Lock & Dam 25 Major Rehabilitation, and Melvin Price Locks & Dam. 3. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS, MO AND IL Location. The Mississippi River rises in Lake Itasca, MN, and from that lake flows southerly about 2,340 miles and empties into the Gulf of Mexico. Portion included in this report embraces the 195-mile section known as "Middle Mississippi", between tributary Ohio and Missouri Rivers about 974 to 1,169 miles from the gulf. (See folder by Corps of Engineers of Navigation Charts, Middle and Upper Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Minneapolis, MN.) Previous projects. For details see page 1879 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1014 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for obtaining and maintaining a minimum channel depth of not less than 9 feet, a minimum width of not less than 300 feet at low water, with additional widths in bends from mouth of Ohio River (about 974 miles from gulf) to northern boundary of city of St. Louis, mile 191, thence 200 feet wide, with additional width in bends to mouth of Missouri River, mile 195; to be obtained: (1) by regulating works, for closing secondary channels, contracting river by building new banks where river width is excessive and protecting new and old banks from erosion where necessary to secure permanency at an estimated total Federal cost (Oct 1998 price level) of $274,000,000; (2)by dredging to maintain project channels; (3) by construction of works authorized for Chain of Rocks reach in 1945 River and Harbor Act, which approved a comprehensive plan for development of the river at Chain of Rocks to provide for construction of a lateral canal at a cost of $59,720,600; and (4) by construction of a fixed-crest rock-fill dam about 900 feet below Chain of Rocks Bridge, authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act, at a cost of $4,353,000, excluding $7,000 costs to Coast Guard for aids to navigation. A small boat harbor opposite Chester, IL, was deauthorized and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. See H. Doc. 669 (76th Cong., 3rd sess.) for report of Chief of Engineers dated Feb. 27, 1940, containing a general plan for improvement of Mississippi River between Coon Rapids Dam and mouth of Ohio River for purposes of navigation, power development, flood control, and needs of irrigation. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regulating Works: contracts continue on stone dike and revetment construction; as well as engineering bendway weir design, supervision and administration. Construction on existing project began in 1881 and project has been in beneficial use practically from its inception. Projects on Dam 27 and Chain of Rocks are complete. Work on the project is about 68 percent complete. Channel as a whole has been greatly improved by the work completed to date. Dredging is required at low stages to remove temporary shoals and maintain required channel depths. River is generally above 10-foot stage, St. Louis gage, from latter part of February to the latter part of August, during which time project channel depths generally prevail without dredging. Following the great Mississippi River Flood of 1993, it became apparent that the Chain of Rocks, East Canal Levee was not performing as intended. Sand boils were developing along a sizeable reach at flood elevations considerably below design height. Emergency repairs were completed in FY 97. In FY 96, repairs and rehabilitation of the relief well system were completed. In FY 97, work was completed on the relocation of a drainage ditch at the toe of the levee. The cost of the emergency repairs totals nearly $12,000,000. In Jan 1998, Headquarters approved the design deficiency report, recommending additional berms, relief wells, and a pump station. Funds to initiate deficiency corrections were budgeted for FY 1999. 14-2 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT Maintenance. Work consists of approximately 2,000 feet of dike repair and 5,000 feet of revetment repair yearly. U.S. plant and hired labor plus contract dredging perform channel dredging removing 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 cubic yards of material (average year) from main channel. Condition and operation studies, recreation planning, engineering and design, and operation and maintenance of Lock and Dam 27 continued. 4. ST. LOUIS HARBOR, MO AND IL Location. The project area includes both sides of the Mississippi River from miles 138.8 to 208.8 above the Ohio River (generally, the limits of the Port of Metropolitan St. Louis). Existing project. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The authorized project includes improvements in two areas: the North Riverfront area in Missouri (which is served by the St. Louis Municipal Docks) and the Tri-City Port area along the east bank of the Chain of Rocks Canal in Illinois. The principal project at the St. Louis Municipal Docks is an L-dike sediment control structure in the river to provide reliable water access to the dock when the river is low. The principal project at the Tri-City Port area is a 210 ft. wide harbor along 6,900 ft. of the Chain of Rocks Canal. The North Riverfront project and half the Tri-City harbor (3.450 ft.) would be constructed in Phase 1, and the second half of the Tri-City harbor in Phase 2 approximately 10 years later. Estimated cost of the project (1998) is $15,074,000 Federal and $29,734,000 Non-Federal. A March 1986 Reevaluation Report described model tests which showed that the L-dike sediment control structure recommended for the St. Louis Municipal Docks would not be effective but that appropriate configuration of a new outer wall for the docks, referred to as the Prototype River Access Improvement Structure (PRAIS), would divert currents so as to control scour and sedimentation and maintain sufficient water depths for the needs of the harbor. Local cooperation. The District coordinated with the two local sponsors and found that (1) the city of St. Louis Port Authority supports the PRAIS project and (2) the Tri-City Regional Port Authority wants the Corps to consider the possibility of reducing the length of their Phase I harbor to 1,800 ft. and shifting its location so that it is a northern extension of the existing Tri-City harbor (the authorized project length of 6,900 ft. would be maintained by increasing the length of the Phase 2 harbor to 5,100 ft.). Operations and results during the fiscal year. In January 1992 District completed a letter report that documented a preliminary analysis of the costs and benefits of the PRAIS and the Tri-City harbor projects. Headquarters reviewed the letter report and directed that new economic studies and other work be accomplished and documented in a General Reevaluation Report (GRR) with a Project Study Plan (PSP). Preparation of the GRR began in FY 97 and continued in FY 98. 5. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION No activity for FY 98. 6. ALTON TO GALE ORGANIZED LEVEE DISTRICTS, IL & MO Location. The levee system is located adjacent to the Mississippi River between Alton and Gale, Illinois. Existing Project. The project is authorized by the Flood Control Acts of 1936, 1938 and 1946. Construction of the Alton to Gale levee system was completed in 1977. Some reaches of this levee system have, for many years, been experiencing a significant number of slides associated with design deficiencies increasing the probability of levee failure during flood events. The recommended plan will correct these slides by a lime stabilization procedure. Estimated cost (1997) is $109,018,000 Federal and $4,374,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. The cost sharing applicable for the Alton to Gale Levee Slide repairs is in accordance with policies established for the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662. The local sponsor is required to operate and maintain all works after completion. Supplemental assurances have been executed for the portion of the remedial work that is 100% federally funded. Operations and results during fiscal year. PL 84-99, 1995 Flood Repair completed (see paragraph 19). Resumption of project initiated. New slides were discovered during the 1997 spring levee inspections. The contract to repair the Blue Waters Levee in the Metro East Drainage and Levee District was completed Oct. 1997. 14-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 7. CAPE GIRARDEAU-JACKSON, MO Location. Missouri, along the right bank of the Mississippi River between River Miles 50 and 55 above the Ohio River. Existing Project. The project includes a 157 acre dry detention reservoir; approximately one mile of channel improvements on Cape La Croix Creek and two miles of channel improvements on Walker Branch, eight bridge replacements; recreational/environmental features and non structural features which are not going to be implemented at this time. The project is authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662). The estimated Federal project cost (1998) is $36,293,000. Non-Federal cost is $13,044,000. Local Cooperation. The city of Cape Girardeau, MO, local sponsor, is strongly supportive of the project. The Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was executed on May 25, 1990 with a modification to the LCA executed on Oct. 27, 1992. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described in the FY 1991 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Design continued on the Detention Reservoir. Awarded the contract for Walker Branch #3 in Dec 1997. 8. EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, IL Location. Project is in St. Clair and Madison Counties, IL, on the left bank of the Mississippi River between river miles 175 and 195 above the Ohio River. Project includes all bottom lands between bluffs on the east and Mississippi River and Chain of Rocks Canal on the west, and extends from Cahokia diversion channel on the north to Prairie du Pont Creek on the south. (See Corps of Engineers Navigation Charts, Middle and Upper Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Minneapolis, MN.) Existing project. The 1936 Flood Control Act authorized raising and enlarging existing levee systems by construction or reconstruction of 19.8 miles of levee, including 3.1 miles of floodwall, together with necessary appurtenant works consisting of gravity drainage structures, highway and railroad closure structures, alterations and reconstruction of existing pumping plants, alterations to railroad bridges and approaches at levee crossings, service roads on levee crown, and seepage control measures. Work under this authorization provides the area protection against a flood flow of 1,300,000 cfs which was originally considered a 200-year frequency flood; however, with the completion of retention reservoirs upstream this protection is currently considered a 500-year level of protection. The completed 10 miles of levee along Chain of Rocks Canal and Lock 27 provide flood protection on the landward side integral with and to the same degree as the East St. Louis levee. Final cost of work under this authorization is $22,550,100. The Flood Control Act of 1965 modified existing project to provide for channel improvements, diversion ditches, flood plain detention areas, a reservoir on Little Canteen Creek, and a pumping plant to considerably reduce damages resulting from interior flooding. This act also authorized reconstruction of a channel stabilization dam in Cahokia Creek diversion channel to provide protection to adjacent levees and bridges from scour and eventual loss. Post authorization studies in the early 1980's have indicated that flood plain detention areas, the reservoir on Little Canteen Creek and other related flood control measures in the Cahokia-Harding Ditch Area are not economically feasible. Severe flooding which has resulted in National Disaster Declarations each of the last four years for the Harding Ditch and Cahokia Canal areas resulted in a new Congressional appropriation in FY 98 to restart a general reevaluation of the interior area. Congress added funds in FY 1998 to continue this effort. Also, further studies of the channel stabilization dam in Cahokia Creek diversion channel have been deferred due to lack of support from the local sponsor of the project. Estimated total Federal project cost of work under this authorization is $33,600,000 (1985), $22,020,000 for Cahokia-Harding Ditch Area, and $11,580,000 for Blue Waters Ditch. Non-Federal cost is $20,770,000. The 1988 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act authorized repair and rehabilitation of pump stations and appurtenant works, channels and bridge structures. The estimated total cost of this work (1997) is $29,460,000 Federal and $12,844,000 Non-Federal. Local cooperation. For work under the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1988, PL 100-202, local interests have entered into three Local Cooperation Agreements (LCA) which cover all of the work in the Flood Protection Rehabilitation project. Construction work under the first two LCAs complete, and construction work under the third LCA is underway. A fourth LCA is planned for work on Canteen Creek. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction was completed for repairs to the 14-4 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT East St. Louis Pump Station North Sewer, permanently closing small gravity drains, and Horseshoe Lake Gravity drains. The local sponsor continued ditch rehabilitation. 9. MERAMEC RIVER BASIN (VALLEY PARK), MISSOURI Location. The project is located in St. Louis County, Missouri, adjacent to the left bank of the Meramec River between miles 20.7 and 22.1 above the confluence with the Mississippi River. Existing project. The project was authorized for construction by Section 2(h), Public Law 97-128, Dec. 29, 1981, and Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and would afford partial flood protection to the area. The project provides for construction of 3.2 miles of earthen levee with six gravity drains, three closure structures, interior ponding areas and 33 relief wells required for under-seepage control. Recreational features include standard play equipment, multi-user courts, play field areas, picnic tables, comfort stations, parking areas and hiking/biking trails. Estimated total project cost (1997) $23,839,000; $17,826,000 Federal, and $5,913,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. The Board of Aldermen for the City of Valley Park, Missouri, authorized the mayor to issue a Letter of Intent to sponsor the project. The letter dated Feb. 18, 1987, acknowledged that city officials were aware of cost sharing requirements and of the items of local cooperation and favored construction of the project. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on August 12, 1992. Operations and results during fiscal year. The first two construction contract are complete. Levee Item IIIA was awarded in July 1998. 10. NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. The levee district is in Green and Jersey Counties, IL, on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 15.2 and 23.7 above the Mississippi River. (See Quincy, IL-MO, sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing Project. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Project provides for raising and enlarging 11.4 miles of levee, construction of 1.0 miles of new levee, altering a pumping station and construction of seepage control measures. This project would provide protection to 10,360 acres of land, 9,365 of which are highly productive agricultural lands. A General Design Memorandum (GDM), completed in 1986, indicated that the plan was not economically justified at the interest rate used at the time. The project was declared inactive on Jun. 3, 1987. As a result of the Great Flood of 1993 and the inundation of Illinois State Highway 16/100 within the project area, the 1995 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Bill included funding to perform a flood damage reduction study. Local Cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are described on page 14-11 of FY 1980 Annual Report except that cost sharing policies established by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL-99-662, will also apply. The Nutwood Drainage and Levee District is the local sponsor. The cost sharing agreement for preconstruction engineering and design (PED) was executed in July 1997. Operations and results during fiscal year. PED continued in FY 98. The present total Federal project cost (1998) is $11,050,000; non-Federal cost is $3,350,000. 11. STE. GENEVIEVE, MO Location. The City of Ste. Genevieve is located in Ste. Genevieve County at the edge of the Mississippi River floodplain about 54 miles south of St. Louis, MO. Existing project. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662). The authorizing language states "Congress finds that, in view of the historic preservation benefits resulting from the project," the overall project consists of four parts. Part 1 is a major levee and associated features that will protect the town from the Urban Design Flood on the Mississippi River. Parts 2 and 3 are channel improvements on tributary streams that flow through the town, North and South Gabouri Creek, respectively. Part 4 is recreation features on flood control lands. The Corps of Engineers and the project sponsor are concentrating on designing and constructing Part 1, and Parts 2, and 3 and 4 have been placed in a deferred category. Local cooperation. The project sponsor is the Ste. Genevieve Joint Levee Commission. The City of Ste. Genevieve, Ste. Genevieve County Levee District Number 2, and Ste. Genevieve County Levee District Number 3 hold membership on the Commission. 14-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Operations and results during fiscal year. Progress was made on design and land acquisition for Part 1 of the project. A contract for the North Closure was awarded in FY 97 and will continue in FY 98. 12. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed work was accomplished at a cost of $442,809 for the Fiscal Year 1998. Total cost as of end of fiscal year is $10,517,194. 13. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). See Table 14-F Emergency bank stabilization activities pursuant to Sec. 14, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., as amended. See Table 14-F Emergency flood control activities - repair flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $317,287 for Disaster Preparedness, $3,457 for Emergency Operations, and $118,783 for Rehabilitation. Miscellaneous 14. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Project Modifications for improvement of environment pursuant to Sec. 1135, Public Law 99-662, as amended (preauthorization). During this period $7,344 was expended on Coordination Account; $15,622 on Initial Appraisals; $7,379 on Carlyle Lake Wildlife Management; $71,491 on Rend City Wetlands Restoration; and $176,984 on Pool 25 Water Control. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Public Law 104- 303, Sec. 206. In FY 98, $4,963 was expended on Coordination Account funds and $2,242 on Preliminary Restoration Plans. Multiple-Purpose Project Including Power 15. GENERAL REGULATORY FUNCTIONS Permit Evaluations Enforcement Total Regulatory $ 877,809 248,383 $1,126,192 16. CATASTROPHIC DISASTER PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM Local Preparedness National Preparedness National Emergency Facilities Total $ 19,937 91,569 17,715 $129,221 17. OTHER PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES In FY 98, $1,481,062 was expended on Native American Grave Protection for operation and maintenance. 18. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Location. The portion of the Upper Mississippi River within the boundaries of the St. Louis District extends from the mouth of the Ohio River (river mile 0) to river mile 300, downstream of Lock and Dam 22. Existing project. The project is composed of five elements: Habitat Rehabilitation and Enhancement Projects, Long-term Resource Monitoring, Recreation Projects, Studies of Recreation Impacts and Navigation Traffic Monitoring. (The St. Louis District's involvement has been limited to Habitat Rehabilitation and Enhancement Projects and Long Term Resource Monitoring.) The overall program, involving five states and three engineer districts, is administered by the Mississippi Valley Division. In the St. Louis District, three habitat rehabilitation projects have been constructed. These are Clarksville Management Area, Missouri, Dresser Island, Missouri, and Pharrs Island, Missouri. All projects are being operated and 14-6 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT maintained by the state of Missouri. Through FY 1998, funds allocated to the St. Louis District have amounted to $23,045,000 for design and construction of Habitat Rehabilitation and Enhancement Projects (HREP), $1,198,000 for Long Term Resource Monitoring (LTRM), $1,480,000 for Program Management; and $39,400 for Habitat Needs Assessment. The authorization limit for the overall program projected over a 10-year period is $191,415,000. During FY 98, $24,363 was expended on Baseline Monitoring LTRM; $62,190 on Batchtown; $5,951 on Biological Response Monitoring; $453,911 on Cuivre Island; $121,830 on Program Management, UMREMP; $9,470 on Project Coordination LTRM: $26,081 on Project Evaluation LTRM; $317,004 on Stag Island, MO; $403,997 on Stump Lake; $1,486,790 on Swan Lake; and $18,454 on Habitat Needs Assessment. Local cooperation. The terms of local cooperation, as established by Public Law 99-662, will vary according to the nature of the project, land ownership and pre-existing management responsibilities. The local sponsor for Habitat Rehabilitation and Enhancement projects is usually the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in coordination with the state of Missouri or the state of Illinois. A PCA agreement with the state of Missouri was completed in FY 97 for the Cuivre Island project. Operations and results during the fiscal year. During FY 1998, Habitat Needs Assessment and plans and specifications for Batchtown Phase I were initiated. Construction continued at Cuivre Island, Stump Lake, and Swan Lake. Construction was completed at Stag Island. The final Definite Project Report for Calhoun Point is awaiting approval. Habitat and biological response monitoring activities continued at the Dresser Island, Missouri, Clarksville Refuge, Missouri, and Pharrs Island, Missouri, projects. 19. FORMERLY UTILIZED SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM (FUSRAP) On Oct. 13, 1997, Congress transferred the management of the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) to the Corps of Engineers, via the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1998. The St. Louis District was chosen to carry out remediation at the five St. Louis area sites-- Madison, Illinois, and Latty Avenue, St. Louis Airport (SLAPS), St. Louis Airport and Vicinity Properties (SLAPS VPs), and St. Louis Downtown (SLDS), Missouri. Cleanup will follow the provisions of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. Major accomplishments in FY 98 include the removal of 25,000 cubic yards of material (23,000 from SLAPS; 1,000 from SLAPS VPs; and 1,000 from SLDS); completed engineering evaluation/cost analysis documents for both Latty and SLAPS and the Record of Decision for SLDS. Characterization of the Madison site moved forward, one year ahead of schedule. Rail spurs were constructed, which will enable the Corps to quadruple rail shipping capacity and expedite remediation efforts. 14-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 14-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 1998 3. Mississippi River Between Ohio and Missouri Rivers (Includes Chain of Rocks) 6. Alton to Gale Organized Levee Districts, IL & MO (Contrib. Funds) 7. Cape Girardeau Jackson, MO (Contrib. Funds) 8. East St. Louis and Vicinity, IL (Contrib. Funds) 9. Meramec R. Basin, Valley Park, MO (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 7,087,000 4,560,000 3,617,000 2,768,000 $251,142,600' 9,262,508 4,832,000 3,954,760 2,661,040 250,936,962' 13,089,626 19,725,000 17,858,442 11,479,900 389,245,3212 13,060,229 19,772,318 17,112,937 12,376,769 389,136,0042 -294,000 115,154 20,000 14,000 133,000 48,572 60,250 10,000 13,000 8,854,000 98,259 8,847,965 60,250 23,219 33,219 1,400,000 750,000 446,000 2,790,000 24,998,000 4,376,843 1,694,594 514,368 2,783,256 24,971,409 233,860 -414,597 213,401 -317,820 423,700 21,128 99,980 2,074,780 322,755 1,892,582 2,451,000 3,393,000 2,162,000 1,904,000 43,189,3263 5,914,756 3,537,119 2,086,086 1,914,246 42,977,5134 1,382,000 1,410,000 350,000 150,000 7,557,600 1,473,320 1,540,600 183,210 415,635 7,426,580 -257,000 2,320,000 459,000 1,004,000 8,875,000 1,898,392 2,920,661 513,357 917,231 8,752,068 115,000 340,000 21,285 405,325 30,000 108,400 -1,868 108,206 840,500 532,948 14-8 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 1998 11. Ste. Genevieve, MO (Contrib. Funds) 19. FUSRAP (Total) Madison Latty Avenue St. Louis Airport St. Louis Airport & Vic. Properties St. Louis Downtown Oakridge Transition New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 3,000,000 1,000,000 13,781 -92 -- -- 4,000,000 311,493 1,369,216 1,649,398 -- 1,314,638 1,413,000 -- 434,392 1,220,072 2,727,638 1,654,464 -- 124,999,000 25,494,000 150,493,000 -- 124,999,000 22,481,215 147,480,215 6,000 144,000 6,000 141,046 150,000 147,046 -- 28,737,000 3,730,000 32,467,000 -- 28,737,000 3,488,582 32,225,582 -- 30,717,000 15,396,000 46,113,000 -- 30,717,000 13,319,210 44,036,210 -- 26,509,000 2,037,000 28,546,000 -- 26,509,000 1,720,014 28,229,014 -- 39,030,000 3,987,000 43,017,000 -- 39,030,000 3,621,690 42,651,690 -- 200,000 -- 190,673 200,000 190,673 1. Excludes previous project cost of $1,416,620. 2. In addition $1,139,000 was expended for rehabilitation. 3. Includes $8,072,326 for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. 4. Includes $7,921,939 for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. 14-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 14-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 12, 1996 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907' Mar. 3, 1905' Jun. 25, 1910 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 19542 Jul. 3, 19583 Oct. 21, 1978 Dec. 29, 1981 Aug. 15, 1985 and Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 28, 1990 Oct. 31, 1992 KASKASKIA RIVER, IL Construct canal, lock, and dam to provide a 9-foot navigation channel from mouth to Fayetteville, IL. "... is modified to add fish and wildlife and habitat restoration as project purpose." MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS (See Section 3 of Text) Project for regulating works in 1881. (To obtain a minimum depth of 8 feet.) Dredging introduced as part of the project. These acts practically abrogated that part of project for middle Mississippi which proposed regulating works. Regulating works restored to project and appropriations begun with a view to completion of improvement between Ohio and Missouri Rivers within 12 years at an estimated cost of $21 million, exclusive of amounts previously expended. For 9 feet deep and 300 feet wide from Ohio River to northern Rivers and Harbors boundary of city of St. Louis. Project between northern boundary of St. Louis and Grafton (mouth of Illinois River) modified to provide a channel 9 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide with additional width around bends. Modified to provide construction of a lateral canal with lock at Chain of Rocks. Modified to provide construction of a small-boat harbor opposite Chester, IL. Modified to provide construction of a fixed crest rockfill dam 900 feet below Chain of Rocks Bridge. MELVIN PRICE LOCKS & DAM (FORMERLY LOCK AND DAM NO. 26 (REPLACEMENT)) Construct new dam and a 1,200-foot lock approximately 2 miles downstream of the existing structure. Change name from "Lock and Dam No. 26" to "Melvin Price Lock and Dam" upon termination of service in U.S. Congress. Construct a second lock, 600 feet long at the Lock and Dam No. 26. (Replacement) Project. Modified to provide construction of cost-shared recreation facilities within the state of Illinois Modified to allow cost-shared recreation with other non-Federal interests and authorized a 24,000 square foot visitor center. S. Doc. 44, 87th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 104-303 Annual Report, 1881, p. 1536. Committee Doc. 9, 69th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 12, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 231, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 230, 83d Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 95-502, 95th Cong. Public Law 97-118, 97th Cong. Public Law 99-88 and Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong. Public Law 101-640, 101st Cong. Public Law 102-580, 102nd Cong. 14-10 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 12, 1996 1960 River and Harbor Act as amended. Section 107 Nov. 26, 1986 Oct. 12, 1996 Jun. 22, 1936 Jun. 28, 1938 1946 Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 12, 1996 Nov. 28, 1990 Amended project for recreation to include other contiguous nonproject lands, including those referred to as the Alton Commons. SOUTHEAST MISSOURI PORT, MO Construct harbor channel with adjacent landfill. ST. LOUIS HARBOR, MO & IL (See Section 4 of Text) As outlined in the Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated Apr. 30, 1984, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorizes navigation improvements. The Secretary shall complete a limited reevaluation of the authorized St. Louis Harbor Project in the vicinity of the Chain of Rocks Canal, Illinois, consistent with the authorized purposes of that project, to include evacuation of waters collecting on the land side of the Chain of Rocks Canal East Levee ALTON TO GALE ORGANIZED LEVEE DISTRICTS, IL & MO (See Section 6 of Text) Authorized construction of levees to protect area from flooding from the Mississippi River. CAPE GIRARDEAU, JACKSON METROPOLITAN AREA, MO (See Section 7 of Text) As outlined in the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Dec. 8, 1984, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorizes flood control and related recreational improvements in the Cape La Croix Creek Watershed. As outlined in the Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated July 18, 1994, the Water Resources and Development Act of 1996 authorizes construction, including nonstructural measures, at a total cost of $45,414,000 ($33,030,000 Federal; $12,384,000 non-Federal) COLDWATER CREEK, MO As outlined in the report of the Chief of Engineers dated Aug 9, 1988, the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 authorizes flood control. Public Law 104-303 Public Law 99-662 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 104-303 Special report on record in OCE Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 104-303, 104th Congress Public Law 101-640 101st Cong. 14-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 14-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 22, 1936 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 22, 1976 Dec. 22, 1987 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 17, 1986 Jul. 14, 1984 Jun. 28, 1938 Nov. 7, 1966 EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, IL (See Section 8 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee. Construct pumping plant and other modifications to reduce interior flooding. Construct Blue Waters Ditch as independent section. Repair and rehabilitate pump stations and appurtenant works, channels, and bridges. ELDRED AND SPANKEY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. HARTWELL DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. HILLVIEW DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. KASKASKIA ISLAND DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee. MALINE CREEK, MO As outlined in the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Nov. 2, 1982, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorizes flood control, recreation, and environmental improvements. MAUVAISE TERRE DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, MO (See Section 9 of Text) Construct reservoirs and local protection project. Construct Pine Ford, Irondale, and I-38 dams and 19 Angler-use sites. (See Section 14 of Text) Special report on record in OCE. H. Doc 329, 88th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 94-587, 94th Cong. Public Law 100-202, 100th Cong. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 519, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Energy and Water Development Approp. Act of 1985, 98th Cong., 2nd sess. Flood Control Committee, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 525, 89th Cong., 2d sess. 14-12 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Dec. 29, 1981 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 28, 1990 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 28, 1938 Oct. 23, 1962 Undertake structural and nonstructural flood control measures. MCGEE CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Reconstruct existing levee and construct pumping plant to reduce flooding. MEREDOSIA LAKE AND WILLOW CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 10 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. REND LAKE, BIG MUDDY RIVER, IL Construct dam at Benton, IL, and subimpoundment dams on upper arms of reservoir. RIVER DES PERES, MO As outlined in the report of the Chief Engineers dated May 23, 1989, the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 authorizes flood control. STE. GENEVIEVE, MO (See Section 11 of Text) As outlined in the Report of the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors dated Apr. 16, 1985, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorizes construction of a levee and a pumping plant to protect the city from Mississippi River and Gabouri Creek floods. WOOD RIVER DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Construct reservoirs and local protection projects. CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND RESERVOIR, SALT RIVER, MO Modified act of Jun. 28, 1938 by deleting the reservoir therefrom and reauthorizing it as a separate multiplepurpose project. Public Law 97-128, 97th Cong. Amended Section 1128, Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc 541, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 101-640 101st Cong. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 507, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 14-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 14-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 Changes name of project from Joanna Dam to present Public Law 89-298, designation. 89th Cong. Oct. 13, 1997 Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) Energy and Water (See Sec. 19 of text.) Development Approp. Carry out remediation at five St. Louis Area sites - Act of 1998 Madison, Illinois, Latty Avenue, St. Louis Airport, St. Louis Airport and Vicinity Properties, and St. Louis Downtown, MO. 1. Also joint resolution, Jun. 29, 1906. 2. Inactive. 3. All work completed. 14-14 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1998 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Cuivre River, MO' 1883 $ 12,000 $ -- -- Moccasin Springs, MO 1969 76,4362 -- -- Southeast Missouri Port, MO 1993 3,466,522 1,616,839 Apr. 89 Wabash Railroad Bridges, Illinois River, Meredosia, and Valley City, IL 1961 2,653,194 1961 -- 1. Inactive. River declared nonnavigable by act of Mar. 23, 1900. 2. Excludes $56,605 contributed funds. 14-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 14-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1998 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Clarence Cannon Dam and Reservoir, Salt River, MO 1996 313,180,128 75,660,417 -- Cache River Diversion, IL 1953 2,837,114 -- 1953 Cape Girardeau, MO, No. 2 1965 5,157,805 -- 1964 Carlyle Lake, IL 1981 42,819,400 85,529,987 Oct. 1976 Chouteau, Nameoki, and Venice Drainage and Levee District, IL 1955 185,700 -- 1955 Columbia Drainage and Levee District No. 3, IL 1981 2,818,000 -- Aug. 1981 Degognia and Fountain Bluff Levee and Drainage District, IL 1959 5,889,500 -- 1959 Dively Drainage & Levee District, IL 1976 1,720,000 -- 1976 Emergency bank protection for certain highway and railroad facilities at Price Landing, MO (see Flood Control Act of 1944)' 1950 55,415 -- Oct. 1949 Emergency repairs to levees on Mississippi, Illinois, and Kaskaskia Rivers and flood fighting and rescue work (Sec. 5, Flood Control Act of 1941, as amended)' 1953 -- -- 1951 Emergency protection for certain highway and railroad facilities at Chester, IL, bridge (Sec. 12, Flood Control Act of 1944) 1952 50,000 -- Jan. 1952 Emergency protection for Illinois approach, Chain of Rocks Bridge (Sec. 12, Flood Control Act of 1944) 1946 25,000 -- Aug. 1945 Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5, IL 1970 1,154,800 -- 1958 Grand Tower Drainage and Levee District, IL 1959 4,677,900 -- 1959 Harrisonville Levee and Drainage District, IL 1981 6,829,069 -- Mar. 1981 Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District, IL 1959 297,460 -- 1949 Kaskaskia River, IL2 1989 147,387,000 25,088,098 1988 Lake Shelbyville, IL 1981 44,000,000 90,991,348 Sep. 1978 Mauvaise Terre Drainage and Levee District, IL 1989 589,000 -- 1988 McGee Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1989 25,043,300 -- 1989 Meredosia Lake and Willow Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1944 249,738 -- 1944 Miller Pond Drainage District, IL 1955 164,183 -- 1955 14-16 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD (Continued) CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1998 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Mississippi River Agricultural Area 8, MO 1987 2,137,000 -- -- Mississippi River at St. Louis, MO 1980 79,265,166 -- Jan. 1980 Mississippi River, Alton to Gale, IL, underseepage measures -- 85,422 -- Oct. 1962 North Alexander Drainage and Levee District, IL 1957 939,569 -- 1957 Nutwood Drainage and Levee District, IL 1989 670,000 -- 1984 Perry County Drainage and Levee3 District Nos. 1, 2, and 3, MO 1987 7,968,700 -- 1986 Pine Ford Lake, MO 1996 3,644,000 -- Prairie du Pont Levee and Sanitary District, IL4 1970 6,005,127 -- 1970 Prairie du Rocher and vicinity, IL 1959 3,882,600 -- 1959 Preston Drainage and Levee District, IL 1959 1,866,910 -- 1959 Rend Lake, Big Muddy River, IL5'6 1989 43,700,900 67,385,471 1988 Strington, Ft. Chartres, and Ivy Landing, IL 1957 2,123,700 -- Aug. 1956 Urban areas at Alton, IL 1960 192,000 -- -- Village of New Athens, IL 1981 1,983,000 -- Sep. 1981 Valley City Drainage & Levee District, IL' 1967 91,952 -- 1967 Wood River Drainage and Levee District, IL8 1989 17,163,821 -- 1988 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Work complete, now performed under Public Law 99. Excludes $10,461 expended on previous project. Excludes $6,800,700 for previous project. Includes $5,235,927 for previous project. Excludes $550,000 Area Development Administration Funds allotted to the State of Illinois for increased construction costs of Interstate Highway 57 to meet project requirements, and excludes $449,093 Area Redevelopment Administration Funds allotted to the Corps. Includes $6,103,711 credit to State of Illinois for work in kind. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended). Funds are for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938. 14-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 14-E DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contrib See Annual And Funds Funds Project Angler-use sites, Meramec Basin, MO Big Swan D&L District Illinois River, IL Cape Girardeau, MO Reaches Nos 1, 3, and 4 Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL East Cape Girardeau and Clear Creek D&L District, IL Eldred, IL Fort Chartres & Ivy Landing D&L District No. 5 and Stringtown Drainage and Levee District No. 4, IL Grafton Small Boat Harbor, IL I-38 Lake, MO Indian Creek Area Illinois River, IL Irondale Lake, MO Keach Drainage and Levee District, IL Levee Districts between Carlyle and New Athens, IL, Nos. 2, 5, 6 and 7 Levee Districts between Carlyle and New Athens, IL Nos. 3, 4, 8, 10 and 13 Levee Districts between Cowden and Vandalia, IL Meramec Park Lake, MO Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 10, MO Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 12, MO Mississippi River at Alton, IL Small Boat Harbor Preston Drainage and Levee District, IL Richland Creek, IL Riverland Levee District, MO Scott County D&L District Illinois River, IL Small Boat Harbor opposite Chester, IL Small Boat Harbor opposite Hamburg, IL Ste. Genevieve County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, MO Report For Authority Expended Exp 1967 WRDA 1986 -- -- 1959 1964 1963 1962 1971 1962' 1979 1979 1978 1967 1967 1958' 1959 1969 1936 1954' 1950' 1936 Oct 86 WRDA 1986 Oct 86 Oct 78 PL 100-676 Jan 90 PL 100-676 Jan 90 Nov 79 WRDA 1986 Oct 86 Nov 77 PL 100-676 1 Jan 1990 Nov 81 PL 100-676 1 Jan 1990 WRDA 1986 Oct 86 Nov 79 Nov 79 Oct 78 Dec 81 Nov 79 WRDA 1986 Oct 86 Nov 77 PL 100-676 1 Jan 1990 PL 100-676 10 Aug 89 Aug 77 WRDA 1986 Oct 86 Nov 77 Nov 77 Nov 77 $ 22,000 4,984,500 1,920,600 -- -- -- -- 496,000 37,682,514 -- -- -- 1,866,910 401,000 'Year authorized. 14-18 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-E DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (Continued) For Last Full Report Date Federal Contrib See Annual And Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Exp St. Louis County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, MO 1936 Nov 77 -- -- Union Lake, MO 1979 PL 100-676 4,931,154 -- Jan 90 Wiedmer Chemical Drainage and Levee District, MO 1936 Nov 77 -- -- 14-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 14-F FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Project FISCAL YEAR COST Federal Cost Non-Federal Total Flood Control (Section 205, P. L. 858, preauthorization) Bois Brule L&D District, MO $ 111,355 58,651 170,006 Grafton, IL 21,937 21,937 Grand Tower D&LD Levee 68 68 Hillview D&LD, IL 29,944 29,944 Modoc Levee & Drainage District, Prairie, IL 89,292 22,005 111,297 Section 205 Coordination Account 11,484 11,484 St. Peters, MO 4,094,009 376,000 4,470,009 4,358,089 456,656 4,814,745 Emergency StreamBank & Shoreline Protection (Section 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, P.L. 526) Caulks Creek, Metro St. Louis Sewer, MO $ 26,352 26,352 Fayette County, Highway 23 8,278 8,278 Lincoln City Road 729 -23,583 -23,583 Lincoln County Road 3,983 3,983 McKelvey School 60 60 Missouri Bottoms Levee, MO 5,372 5,372 Section 14 Coordination Account 9,398 9,398 St. Louis Water Lines, MO 51,066 51,066 Wildwood, MO Site 1 10,460 10,460 Total Section 14 91,386 91,386 14-20 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-G ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) Project FISCAL YEAR COST Federal Non-Federal Total SURVEYS (Category 100) Navigation Studies (110) Miss. River, Vicinity St. Louis-10400 Subtotal Flood Damage Prevention Studies(120) Alexander and Pulaski Counties,IL-12217 Ballwin, MO-10463 Chesterfield, MO-10457 Coldwater Creek, MO-55040 Festus and Crystal City, MO-10458 Kimmswick, MO-10459 Lower River des Peres, MO-10460 Wood River Levee, IL-10524 Subtotal Review of Authorized Projects (160) St. Louis Flood Protection, MO-17360 Wood River D&LD, IL-20180 Subtotal Miscellaneous Activities(170) Interagency Water Resources Development-14713 Review of FERC Licenses-53857 Special Investigations-17250 Waterfowl Management Plan-53904 Subtotal Coordination Studies with Other Agencies(180) PAS - St. Louis Combined Sewer Outflow-29005 PAS - Jefferson Flood Hazard Study-29007 Subtotal TOTAL (Category 100) COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIN DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) Automated Information System Support (294)Cage-53914 Automated Information System Support (294)GCase-53916 Flood Plain Management Services (250)-82030, 82040, 82045, 83015, 83017, 83019, 83153, 83154 Hydrology Studies (260)-10463 TOTAL (Category 200) 110,939 73,587 169,383 52 148,863 953 80,327 61,408 83,028 193,967 73,587 171,662 341,045 52 187,097 335,960 953 11,766 92,093 61,408 645,512 453,553 1,099,065 46,030 46,030 63,515 63,515 109,545 109,545 22,672 22,672 458 458 18,590 18,590 5,490 5,490 47,210 47,210 9,885 9,845 19,730 3,299 3,299 13,184 9,845 23,029 $815,477 463,398 1,278,875 334 334 3,455 3,455 146,178 146,178 16,988 16,988 166,955 166,955 14-21 $ 26 26 $26 26 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 14-G ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (Continued) (96x3121) Project FISCAL YEAR COST Federal Non-Federal Total ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (Category 600) Nutwood D&LD, IL-00623 $528,419 33,224 561,643 St. Louis Harbor, MO & IL-10184 454,224 454,224 Ste. Genevieve, MO-75453 9,721 9,721 Wood River D&LD, IL-20180 885 885 TOTAL (Category 600) $993,249 33,224 1,026,473 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 1,975,681 496,622 2,472,303 14-22 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT * This district comprises most of the northern half of Illinois, portions of southern Wisconsin, southern and southwestern Minnesota, eastern and central Iowa, and northeastern Missouri, embraced in drainage basin of Mississippi River and its eastern and western tributaries between mile 300 (above mouth of Ohio River) and 614, and of its eastern tributaries only, between Hamburg Bay, at mile 261 and 300. This district also includes the Illinois Waterway above mile 80 with its tributaries and drainage basins. The section of the Mississippi River between river miles 300 and 614 is included in the report on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN. IMPROVEMENTS Page Navigation 1. Illinois and Mississippi Canal, IL ...... 15-2 2. Illinois Waterway, IL and IN ......... 15-2 3. Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN .............. 15-4 4. Upper Mississippi River - Illinois Navigation Study .................. 15-4 5. Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program (UMRS-EMP), IL, IA, MN, MO, WI ............... 15-4 6. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ... 15-4 Flood Control 7. Coralville Lake, IA ................ 15-5 8. Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, IA .................... 15-5 9. Loves Park, IL ................... 15-5 10. Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, IA . 15-6 11. Saylorville Lake, IA ............... 15-6 12. West Des Moines, IA .............. 15-7 13. Muscatine Island, IA ............... 15-7 14. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .................. 15-7 15. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects . 15-7 16. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .................... 15-7 Miscellaneous 17. General Regulatory Functions ......... 15-8 18. Catastrophic Disaster Preparedness Program ........................ 15-8 19. Ecosystem Restoration Work under Special Authorization .................... 15-8 General Investigations 20. Surveys ........................ 15-8 21. Collection and Study of Basic Data ..... 15-8 22. Preconstruction Engineering and Design . 15-8 Tables Table 15-A Cost & Financial Statement ... 15-9 Table 15-B Authorizing Legislation ..... 15-11 Table 15-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................ 15-15 Table 15-D Not Applicable Table 15-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .......... 15-16 Table 15-F Not Applicable Table 15-G Deauthorized Projects ...... 15-18 Table 15-H Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects........... 15-19 Table 15-I Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ...... 15-21 Table 15-J Illinois Waterway: Existing Locks and Dams ......... 15-22 Table 15-K Illinois Waterway: Lock and Dam Construction, Foundations, Cost .................. 15-23 Table 15-L Illinois Waterway: Additional Features Entering into Cost .. 15-24 Table 15-M Illinois Waterway: Existing Project ................ 15-25 Table 15-N Illinois Waterway: Total Cost of Existing Project .......... 15-25 Table 15-0 Active General Investigations ............ 15-26 15-1 Navigation Page REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Navigation 1. ILLINOIS AND MISSISSIPPI CANAL, IL Location. This canal extends for 75 miles from the Illinois River near LaSalle, IL, to the Mississippi River at Rock Island, IL. A feeder canal, 29 miles in length, extends from the summit level of the canal to the Rock River at Rock Falls, IL. Existing project. See pages 1306-1308 of Annual Report for 1962 for details regarding project. The canal was constructed in the period 1892-1918. The canal has not been operated for navigation since June 1951 in accordance with Corps policy to discontinue operation of waterways affording little or no benefit to navigation. The River and Harbor Act of 1958 authorized the appropriation of $2,000,000 for the purpose of placing the canal in proper condition for public recreational use and to convey and transfer the canal to the State of Illinois as part of the State park system. The repair and modification program was initated in 1961, and a number of canal features have been repaired or modified. In connection with this program, fee title of 1,062 acres and recreational flowage easements over 309 acres of land in Rock River at Rock Falls, formerly under navigation flowage easement, have been acquired. The State of Illinois accepted title to the canal as of August 1, 1970. The River and Harbor Act of 1970 authorized the additional appropriation of $6,528,000 to be expended for the repair, modification, and maintenance of bridges, title transfer, modification or rehabilitation of hydraulic structures, fencing, clearing auxiliary ditches, and for the repair and modification of other canal property appurtenances. The repair and modification work was underway until a suit was filed by three Illinois counties and their Commissioners of Highway against the Federal Government and the State in 1974 over maintenance of highway bridges crossing the canal. After the lawsuit was filed, further rehabilitation work by the Federal Government on the canal was suspended. On November 4, 1981, the Corps of Engineers deposited $3,722,572 with the Clerk of the U.S. District Court in Chicago in full satisfaction of the Court's judgment. These funds were used by the counties to complete rehabilitation work as directed in the court order. Rehabilitation work by the Federal Government in coordination with the state was resumed in 1984 with the remaining authorization expended in 1987. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized an additional appropriation of $8,472,000 to accomplish the work described in the 1970 River and Harbor Act. The State of Illinois field an additional lawsuit against the United States on July 6, 1987 in the U.S. Claims Court in the amount of $8,472,572. In a preliminary decision on September 22, 1988, the court dismissed the claim for $3,722,572. A settlement agreement between the State of Illinois and the United States was signed on November 14, 1991. The agreement provided that Illinois release all claims against the United States as stipulated in the claims court and that the United States provide $4,750,000 to Illinois as reimbursement for previous repair work performed upon the canal bridges by Illinois. On Decemer 16, 1991, the U.S. Claims Court entered a judgment for $4,750,000 in favor of the State of Illinois. This judgment was paid in FY92. Once funds are received, principal work features to restore the canal to acceptable conditions consist of the repair or reconstruction of retaining walls, embankments, portions of the lock and dam structures, culverts, drainage ditches, and other related work features which the United States has maintained or has been obligated to maintain under previous agreements. These features are consistent with a Master Management Plan prepared by the Illinois Department of Conservation. NEPA documentation to assess remaining work items must be completed prior to initiation of construction. Local cooperation. A revised Supplemental Agreement with all work items remaining was executed between the state of Illinois and the Federal Government in April 1996. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and Construction work was performed for a total cost of $722,770. 2. ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN Location. Illinois River (entirely within State of Illinois), formed by confluence of Kankakee and Des Plaines River, flows southwesterly and enters Mississippi at Grafton, IL, about 38 miles above St. Louis. Illinois Waterway comprises Illinois River 15-2 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT from its mouth to confluence of Kankakee and Des Plaines Rivers (273 miles), Des Plaines River to Lockport (18.1 miles) and Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal and South Branch of Chicago River to Lake Street, Chicago (34.5 miles). Also from a point 12.4 miles above Lockport, II, waterway comprises Calumet-Sag Channel and Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers to turning basin 5, near entrance to Lake Calumet (23.8 miles); and Grand Calumet River from junction to 141st Street, deep (lake) draft navigation (9 miles) and to Clark Street, Gary, IN (4.2 miles). Previous projects. For details, see page 1945 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1172 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. See Table 23-K and page 1255 of Annual Report for 1963. Cost of new work was $124,041,436 and includes $445,000 for Recreatin Facilities under Code 711. Calumet-Sag Modification, Part III, placed in the deferred-for-restudy category in March 1972, cost of $33,000,000 (July 1971) Federal and $20,700,000 (July 1971) non Federal; is excluded from present cost estimate. Land acquired for the project consisted 817.5 acres in fee and 1,186.5 acres in flowage easement. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. (See Table 15-J through 15-N on existing locks and dams; lock and dam construction, foundations, cost; additional features entering into cost of project; existing project and total cost of existing project.) Local cooperation. Complied with for completed modifications and Part I of Calumet-Sag Modification. All pools above Alton Pool: Maintenance: Channel dredging by contract cutterhead pipeline dredge was performed in LaGrange, Peoria, and Starved Rock, Marseiles, and Dresden at varous locations at a cost of $754,100 with a total of 155,660 cubic yards of material being removed. Dredging inspection and reports were completed at a cost of $121,100. Dredged material disposal activities and other environmental concerns in connection with dredging cost $196,300. Strike removal and snagging and clearing was accomplished in various locations by hired labor at a cost of $518,400. Structural repairs to locks and dams were performed by hired labor at a cost of $2,429,100. Started Rock Headgate repairs were initiated at a cost of $90,000. Mackinaw DMMP site construction was initiated at a cost of $611,500. Real Estate support of maintenance activities cost $338,200. Buildings, grounds, and utility maintenance at the locks and dams and Illinois Waterway Project Office at Peoria totaled $206,800. Environmental compliance work continued at a cost of $19,900. Permanent operating equipment costs were $133,700. Engineering and design work cost $1,330,100 and supervision, administration, and inspection for the maintenance features totaled $284,400. Total maintenance costs were $7,569,800. Net credits to the project were $178,000. Operation and Care: Operation of the locks and dams and routine maintenance and minor repairs thereto were made at a cost of $9,106,500. Operation of Illinois Waterway Project Office, shops, warehouse, grounds, and utilities at a cost of $176,700. Real Estate management services wee provided at a cost of $44,000. Visitor's Center at Starved Rock Lock and Dam was operated at a cost of $193,900. Surveys, studies, and other inspections were performed at a cost of $957,400; natural and cultural resource costs were $205,200; water control management costs were $874,300. Supervision and administration for the operation features totaled $995,600. Total operation costs were $12,553,600. Total operation and maintenance costs $20,123,400 for all pools above Alton pool. were Rehabilitation: Major Rehabilitation was physically completed on the Illinois Waterway, Four Locks. FY 98 expenditures were $237,014. Alton Pool Operation: Costs for the year were $28,862 for lock operation; $79,328 for project condition surveys; and $91,938 for water control management. Total cost were $200,128. Alton Pool Maintenance: Costs for the year were $1,533,844 for dredging; $11,452 for maintenance of natural resources, facilities; and $96,885 for supervisions and administration. Total maintenance costs were $1,642,181. Total operation and maintenance costs for all pools above Alton Pool were $20,123,400. Rehabilitation costs were $237,014. Alton Pool operation and maintenance costs were $1,842,309. Total costs incurred were $22,202,723. 15-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 3. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN For report on this improvement, see chapter on "Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN." 4. UPPER MISSISSIPPI - ILLINOIS NAVIGATION STUDY Location. The study includes both the Upper Mississippi River and the Illinois Waterway. The study area covers over 850 miles of navigable waterways and 29 locks and dams of the Upper Mississippi River from the headwaters at St. Anthony Falls near Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota; downstream to the mouth of the Ohio River at Cairo; and the Illinois Waterway (eight locks and dams) from Lake Michigan in Chicago, Illinois, southwest to where the waterway joins with the Mississippi River at Grafton, Illinois, 348 miles long. The Upper Mississippi River system meanders through the states of Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois, and Missiouri, and over 40 counties. The Illinois Waterway is located entirely within the State of Illinois. Existing project. The project consists of addressing the need for navigation improvement on the river system. Undertaken by three Corps Districts (St. Paul, Rock Island, and St. Louis), the purpose of the study is to examine information related to the existing condition of the structures and investigate system congestion (lockage delays, inadequate capacity, and recreation/commercial locking conflicts). The review of this completed project is authorized by Section 216, Flood Control Act of 1970, PL 91-611. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. The Feasibility Phase was continued during FY 1998 at a cost of $6,475,247. 5. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (USMRS-EMP), IL IA, MN, MO, WI Location. The project is authorized for those river reaches having commercial navigation channels on the Upper Mississippi River, Illinois River, Minnesota River, St. Croix River, and Kaskaskia River in the states of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin. Existing project. The purpose of the UMRSEMP as stated in the authorizing legislation is to ensure the coordinated development and enhancement of the Upper Mississippi River system, recognizing its several purposes. The program includes habitat rehabilitation and enhancement projects to counteract the effects of backwater sedimentation. Long Term Resource Monitoring will provide the means for more informed managment of the UMRS. Also authorized was a study of the economic impacts of completed recreation, completed navigation traffic monitoring, and recreation projects (currently unfunded). The program was initiated in 1986 utilizing funds provided by PL 99-88, FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriation Act. PL 99-662, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, further defined the program and provided for a 10 year implementation period. The implementation period was extended to 15 years by PL 101-640, Water Resources Development Act of 1990. Local Cooperation: Local cooperation agreements are obtained for habitat projects for such projects not located on lands managed as a national wildlife refuge, within the meaning of Section 906(e) of the 1986 WRDA. Operations During Fiscal Year. Expenditures during the year totaled $18,525,000. The majority of funds was expended on two primary program elements: habitat projects and long term resource monitoring. This fiscal year general design continued on 14 projects; construction was initiated on one project; continued on 16 projects; and completed on three projects. Construction has essentially been completed on a total of 27 projects since the program was initiated. Data collection, analysis of data and production of technical and special reports was continued by contract with the Environmental Management Technical Center in Lake Onalaska, WI. The report to Congress detailing the programs activities since the programs inception was completed and is being prepared for submittal to Congress. A Habitat Needs Assessment was initiated. This assessment will address the ecosystem needs along the Environmental Management Programs' reaches of the Upper Mississippi River. 6. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 15-C 15-4 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT Flood Control 7. CORALVILLE LAKE, IA Location. Coralville Lake is formed by the Coralville Dam on the Iowa River, several miles upstream from Iowa City, Johnson County, IA, about 83 miles above the confluence of the Iowa River with the Mississippi River. Existing project. See page 28-4, Annual Report for 1981, for project details. Construction began in July 1949 and the project has been in operation since February 1958. About 24,961 acres of land were acquired in fee and flowage easements obtained for 3,673 acres. The project was modified to provide for construction of a highway bridge crossing the lake at the Mehaffey site, which was begun in June 1964 and completed in October 1966. See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation. Operations during fiscal year. No new work was performed during FY 98. Operation and Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities continued at a cost of $3,227,946. 8. DES MOINES RECREATIONAL RIVER RIVER AND GREENBELT, IA Location. The greenbelt area is located along both banks of the Des Moines River in central IA and extends from a point at which relocated U.S. Highway 92 crosses the Des Moines River near Harvey, upstream approximately 169 river miles to U.S. Highway 20, and includes portions of Fort Dodge, IA. It also includes the Corps' operated Lake Red Rock and Saylorville Lake projects. Existing project. The project will include, but not be limited to: (1) the construction, operation, and maintenance of recreational facilities and streambank stabilization structures; (2) maintenance of all structures constructed before the date of authorization of this project (other than any such structure operated and maintained by any person under a permit or agreement with the Secretary); (3) such tree plantings, trails, vegetation, and wildlife protection and development for recreational purposes; and (4) the prohibition or limitation by the Secretary of the killing, wounding, or capturing at any time of any wild bird or animal in such areas as may be directed by the Secretary. In carrying out the project the Secretary may acquire by purchase, donation, exchange, or otherwise, land and interests therein, as the Secretary determines are necessary to complete the project. The authorization requires that an Advisory Committee be established for consultation with the Department of the Army consisting of 47 members; three Corps of Engineers appointees, one person from the city of Des Moines, and one from each other incorporated municipality within the greenbelt, two from each of the nine counties in the greenbelt, and five from the State of Iowa. See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Letters of assurance have been received for 15 seperable elements. Local cooperation Agreements have been executed for five separable elements. Operations during fiscal year. Coordination was maintained with the Advisory Committee in accordance with Public Law 99-88. Construction was completed on the Red Rock Trails Segment IVA. Due to lack of funding, work remained deferred on eleven projects: Red Rock Trails Segment IVA; Botanical Center Park; Johnston Trail and Canoe Access; Raccoon River Trail; Raccoon River Regional Park; Polk City - Big Creek Trail; Webster City - Briggs Wood Trail; Dayton - Stratford Trail; Knoxville; Riverview Park; and Saylorville Barrier Dam Trail. Twelve projects in total have been completed to date. Costs incurred in FY 1998 were $301,192. 9. LOVES PARK, IL Location. The Loves Park project is located in Winnebago County, IL on the northeast boundary of the city of Rockford, IL. Loves Park is 17 miles south of the Illinois-Wisconsin state line. Existing project. The project provides 100-year level of protection against flooding along Loves Park Creek. Protection measures consist of 17,900 feet of channel improvements, a 16,300 GPM pump plant, and ponding. The estimated project cost is $32,500,000 including $10,000,000 non-federal costs. See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation: The local cooperation agreement was executed on March 26, 1991. Operation during fiscal year. Planning, Engineering, and Design was continued to develop Plans and Specifications relative to Stage I. The city 15-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 continued to work on the acquisition of rights-of-way for Stage I. Construction was completed on the revegetation contract for Stages IIA-2 and IIB. Total costs incurred during FY 98 were $254,769. 10. RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IA Location. The site of this project is on the Des Moines River, chiefly in Marion County, but extending into Jasper, Warren, and Polk Counties. The dam is 142.9 miles above the mouth of the Des Moines River, which empties into the Mississippi River at mile 361.4 above the mouth of the Ohio River. The city of Des Moines lies northwesterly from the site, about 60 miles upstream. Existing project. See page 28-6, Annual Report for 1981 for description of the project. Construction began in May 1960, and the dam was placed in beneficial use for storage of flood water in January 1969. Land acquired for the project consisted of 49,567.96 acres in fee and 26,823.795 acres in flowage easement. Landowner complaints, that lake operation have flooded their lands more frequently than what they were told to expect when flowage easements were initially acquired, led Congress to modify the project authorization. Language in PL 99- 190 authorizes acquisition from willing sellers fee simple title in real property, which is subject to periodic flooding in connection with the operation of the project. Potentially there are approximately 1,000 tracts consisting of about 30,000 acres. Estimated Federal cost is $43,500,000. See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Additional Land Acquisition efforts were deferred due to lack of funding. Land acquisition costs incurred were $53,269. Operation and Maintenance activities were continued at a cost of $4,053,859. 11. SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA Location. The project site is chiefly in Polk County, IA, but portions extend into Dallas and Boone Counties. The dam is about 213.7 miles above the mouth of the Des Moines River and about 5 miles upstream from the city of Des Moines, IA. Existing project. The dam is an earth embankment 6,750 feet long at crest with a height of 120 feet. Outlet works are a single circular concrete conduit, 22 feet in diameter, located at the toe of the west bluff. Control structure is at upstream end of conduit and uses three gates. A stilling basin is provided to dissipate energy of discharge from outlet conduit. Spillway is in the west bluff, weir 430 feet long. Water flowing over the spillway weir discharges into a paved chute and thence into an excavated earth channel to the Des Moines River. Top of spillway is about 31 feet below top of earth embankment secton, and flow over weir is uncontrolled when water in reservoir reaches its crest. Watershed area above dam site is 5,823 square miles. With pool at spillway crest elevation, lake area is 16,700 acres and contains about 676,000 acre-feet of water at that height (602,000 for flood control and 74,000 for a conservation pool to maintain minimum flows at downstream points). Lake supplements capacity of downstream Lake Red Rock at river mile 142.9. The two lakes provide a high degree of flood protection to the lower Des Moines River Valley. Reach along the Mississippi River downstream from the mouth of the Des Moines River are also benefitted. A project modification plan to minimize the adverse environmental effects at Ledges State Park, located upstream from the dam, was authorized in 1976. The project modification included relocation of affected park facilities, acquisition of additional park land, and the development of a floodway corridor, with recreational facilities, from the dam downstream to Sixth Avenue in Des Moines. Improvements to Highway 415, the main access road to existing facilities on the east side of the reservoir, were added to the project by Congress in 1984. Segments A and B of Highway 415 have been completed. Segment C of Highway 415 was completed in 1994. Construction began in June 1965, and the dam was placed in operation for the storage of flood water in April 1977. Remedial work in Big Creek Valley, consisting of diversion dam and channel and a barrier dam, for the protection of the town of Polk City was completed in December 1974. The land acquisition program involved 25,545 acres in fee and flowage easements for 1,471 acres. The estimated project cost is $116,470,000 including $2,820,000 in non-Federal costs from the State of Iowa and the City of 15-6 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT Des Moines, for recreational development. Table 15-B for authorizing legislation. See Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Project right-of-way has been transferred to the Iowa Department of Transportation, the project sponsor. Planning, Engineering, and Design efforts for the 86th street improvements project were turned over to Polk County. Costs incurred were $16,627. Operation and maintenance activities were continued at a cost of $4,861,334. The project is about 97 percent completed, excluding deferred work. 12. WEST DES MOINES, IA Location. The city is located in Polk County in central Iowa. Existing project. The project provides flood protection from the Raccoon River and Walnut Creek. The project consists of four stages: Stage I, 3,100 feet of levees and floodwalls along Walnut Creek north of Ashworth Road; Stage II, 9,000 feet of levees along the Raccoon River from Jordan Creek to 63rd Street, with pump station; Stage IIIA, 4,500 feet of levees along the lower end of Walnut Creek; and Stage IIIB, 5,800 feet of levees and flood walls tieing Stages I and IIIA along Walnut Creek with pump station and tieing Stages II with IIIA along the Raccoon River. The project provides 100-year protection and will prevent 4.387 million dollars in average annual damages. See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of the project is complete. Total costs incurred during FY 98 were $178,360. 13. MUSCATINE ISLAND, IA Location. Muscatine Island lies on the west bank of the Mississippi River in Muscatine and Louisa Counties, Iowa, adjacent and in the city of Muscatine, IA. The flood protection area of 30,800 acres is pro tected by 15.6 miles of existing sand and clay levees. The protected area consists of residential, commercial, industrial and agricultural areas and also includes U.S. Highway 61 and the Muscatine Municipal Airport. Existing Project. The existing levee will be raised to increase the level of protection from less than a 100-year flood and associated closure and utility improvements. The 200-year protection level is achieved by improving and raising approximately 6.6 miles of the existing levee system. Also included in the project is construction of an upstream railroad closure structure, improving drainage facilities, concrete I-wall sections and relocating existing utilities. See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. The city of Muscatine and Muscatine Island Levee District are co-sponsors for the project. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed on 21 September 1995. Operations during fiscal year. Stage I (Railroad Closure) was completed in December 1996. Stage II (Levee Raise) was awarded in September 1997 and essentially completed in September 1998. Stage IIA (Industrial Levee Raise) and Stage II (Agricultural Levee Raise) are to be combined into one contract and the construction contract is scheduled to be awarded in March 1999. The entire project is scheduled to be completed in September 2000. Total costs incurred during FY 98 were $1,396,499. 14. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Federal flood control regulations (part 208 of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations) provide that the structures and facilities constructed by the United States for local flood protection shall be continuously maintained in such a manner and operated at such times and for such periods as may be necessary to obtain the maximum benefits. Costs during the period for inspections of projects turned over to local interests to ascertain compliance with Federal requirements were $292,140. (See Table 15-H for list of completed flood control projects inspected.) 15. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 15-E. 16. FLOOD CONTROL WORK SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION UNDER See Table 15-I. 15-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 17. GENERAL REGULATORY FUNCTIONS Permit Evaluations Enforcement Total Regulatory 18. CATASTROPHIC DISASTER PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM Continuity of Operations National Preparedness Emergency Operations Center Support Total $1,391,018 303,844 $1,694,862 20,147 35,714 17,980 73,841 19. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Project Modifications for improvement of environment pursuant to Sec. 1135, Public Law 99- 662, as amended (preauthorization). During FY 98, $8,574 was expended on Coordination Account Funds; $5,608 on Initial Appraisals; $32,836 on Mississippi River Mast Tree Planting; $8,485 on Buck Run Mod, MO; $518 on Green Island Headwall; and $31,595 on Oquawka Refuge Habitat. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Pursuant to See. 206, P. L. 104-303. In FY 98, $8,203 was expended on Section 206 Coordination Account and $1,895 on Preliminary Restoration Plans. General Investigations 20. SURVEYS There were two flood prevention studies in progress during FY 98 at a cost of $101,860.16. There were three Reviews of Completed Projects at a cost of $6,478,270. Special Investigations, FERC, Interagency Water Resource Development, North American Waterfow Management, Coordination Studies with Other Agencies, and Planning Assistance to States efforts totaled $81,393. Total cost of surveys was $8,639,645. See Table 15-0. 21. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management services cost were $165,477 for FY 98. Hydrologic Studies were continued during FY 98 at a cost of $1,460. Total cost for collection and study of basic data in FY 98 was $166,937. 22. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN There were no PED's in progress during FY 98. 15-8 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 1998 1. Illinois and Mississippi Canal IL 2. Illinois Waterway IL and IN 4. Upper Mississippi -Illinois Navigation Study 5. Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program, IL, IA, MN, MO, WI 7. Coralville Lake, IA 8. Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, IA 9. Loves Park, IL New Work Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab: 67,000 70,000 950,000 458,000 173,433 58,860 693,069 722,770 7,605,143' 7,605,143' 22,855,2482 22,830,2842 -- -- -- -- 126,707,751' -- -- -- -- 126,706,419' 17,983,000 20,862,000 19,045,000 20,609,000 424,354,2374 19,692,026 21,065,271 18,278,706 19,945,545 419,958,2784 Approp. 10,289,507 Cost 11,141,732 Contributed Funds: Approp. 1,240,000 Cost 257,136 New Work: Approp. 7,890,600 Cost 9,547,350 New Work: Approp. 15,498,000 Cost 20,608,000 2,044,000 2,137,938 10,296,000 11,141,732 435,000 620,098 435,000 1,048,220 60,000 161,206,939 92,884 161,062,636 60,000 144,130 7,069,000 9,321,000 6,283,000 6,634,876 8,298,606 6,475,247 13,953,319 12,978,338 45,343,600 25,702,168 17,842,000 17,906,000 164,110,000 328,930,000 21,106,000 18,796,000 18,525,000 162,032,000 Contributed Funds: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 365,000 43,125 348,821 84,996 Maint: Approp. 2,953,100 Cost 2,867,986 New Work: Approp. 3,050,000 Cost 1,528,222 Contributed Funds: Approp. 8,046 Cost -- New Work: Approp. 3,232,000 Cost 2,347,835 Contributed Funds: Approp. Cost 14,000 35,173 26,738 2,910,500 3,353,000 3,017,800 3,059,707 3,385,267 3,227,926 4,000,000 2,446,151 1,065,037 709,118 1,791,000 3,451,391 2,192,805 24,348 301,192 1,254,000 290,000 1,424,638 254,769 1,490,000 1,490,000 250,000 292,049 1,166,344 463,558 50,000 85,657 1,444,000 1,388,631 -- 55,855,074 53,648,270 13,646,000 13,393,279 1,457,849 1,444,555 10,165,176 10,045,236 2,359,000 2,279,375 15-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 15-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 1998 10. Red Rock Dam and New Work: Lake Red Rock, IA Approp. -- 237,000 0 30,000 13,676,000 Cost 900,952 457,085 69,372 53,269 11,021,923 Maint: Approp. 4,223,500 4,907,000 5,618,186 3,628,000 64,083,673 Cost 4,671,960 5,048,062 5,242,535 4,053,859 61,602,052 Contributed Funds: Approp. -- -- (979) -- 19,850 Cost -- -- -- -- 18,422 11. Saylorville Lake New Work: IA Approp. 450,000 20,000 100,000 (80,000) 128,067,887 Cost 470,909 686,151 35,596 16,627 127,868,022 Maint: Approp. 3,375,082 3,927,000 6,436,000 4,338,000 66,070,241 Cost 3,569,385 4,097,403 5,942,532 4,861,335 63,266,218 Contributed Funds: Approp. -- (3,411) -- 139,955 3,534,641 Cost 33,821 -- -- 91,890 3,030,467 12. West Des Moines, IA New Work: Approp. 3,318,000 3,675,000 1,648,000 75,000 12,279,000 Cost 4,147,502 3,731,279 1,520,161 178,360 12,193,644 Contributed Funds: Approp. 945,000 900,000 342,000 -- 2,021,000 Cost 877,607 624,536 473, 61 6,738 1,672,978 13. Muscatine Island, IA New Work: Approp. 200,000 310,000 473,000 1,518,000 2,501,000 Cost 143,196 334,179 491,445 1,396,499 2,365,319 Contributed Funds: Approp. -- 100,000 215,000 88,162 403,414 Cost -- 65,911 222,503 -- 288,414 1. Includes $25,000 Emergency Relief Funds. 2. Includes $4,143,282 for Operating and Care under the "Permanent Indefinite Appropriation." 3. Includes $2,569,102 for previous projects. 4. Includes $1,028,468 for previous projects. 5. Includes cost of Mehaffey Bridge, $1,365,074 (excluding $100,000 contributed funds). 6. Excludes $161,813 contributed funds. 7. Excludes $950,000 non-Federal cost. 15-10 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 June 26, 19341 August 30, 1935 August 30, 19353 June 14, 1937 June 20, 1938 October 23, 1943 March 2, 1945 ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN Channel 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide from mouth of Illinois River to Utica, 231 miles, modification of 2 U.S. locks and dams, removal of 2 State dams. (Act authorized appropriation of not to exceed $3,500,000 for carrying on work.) Channel 9 feet deep from Utica, IL, to heads of present Federal projects on Chicago and Calumet Rivers 94.6 miles to Lake Street, and 96.3 miles to turning basin 5, respectively, to be secured by means of completed dams, locks, lateral canals, and dredging begun by State of Illinois in general accordance with present plans of State for that work. Act adopting project authorized appropriation of not to exceed $7,500,000 for carrying on work. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriation for rivers and harbors. Construct modern locks and dams at LaGrange and Peoria and a channel 9 feet deep and 300 feet wide below Lockport, exact location and details of design of all structures to be left to discretion of Chief of Engineers, and for time being, that no change be made in water authorized for navigation of Illinois River by act of July 3, 1930. Also provides for 3 passing places along Sag Channel and authorized channel in Calumet-Sag route to turning basin 5, and dredging at entrance of Lake Calumet. Realign portion of Calumet River and abandonment of bypassed section of Calumet River. Modifies local cooperation requirements in 1935 act. Pay damages to levee and drainage districts due to seepage and other factors, not to exceed $503,500. Enlarge Calumet-Sag Channel to 160 feet wide and a usable depth of 9 feet. Dredge a barge channel 160 feet wide with a usable depth of 9 feet in Grand Calumet and Little Calumet River Branch of Indiana Habor Canal to deep (lake) draft through 141st St., East Chicago, IN. Construct in Little Calumet River a lock of suitable dimensions for large navigation. Rebuild or otherwise alter at Federal expense all obstructive railroad bridges across Calumet-Sag Channel, Little Calumet River, Calumet River, Grand Calumet River, and Indiana Harbor Canal, so as to provide suitable clearance, except that no Federal funds shall be expended for removal or alteration Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 69th Cong., 1st sess., and S. Doc. 130, 69th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 126, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 184, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. 2 H. Doc. 180, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 711, 77th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 145, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 15-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents March 2, 1947 (Continued) July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 17, 1953 July 3, 1958 August 18, 1968 of Illinois Central RR bridge at mile 11.20 of Little Calumet River. Substitute following work for that authorized by act of March 2, 1945; replace emergency dam in Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal; enlargement of that canal thence to Sag Junction and of Calumet-Sag Channel to afford channels 225 feet wide and usable depth of 9 feet; construct along general route depth of 9 feet to 225 feet wide between Little Calumet River and junction with Indiana Harbor Canal and 160 feet wide thence to Clark St., Gary, IN, with a turning basin at Clark St., enlarge Indiana Harbor Canal to 225 feet wide and usable depth of 9 feet between Grand Calumet River and vicinity of 141st St., inclusive; remove Blue Island lock and construct a lock and control works in Calumet River near its head, and similar structures in proposed Grand Calumet Channel west of Indiana Harbor Canal; alter or eliminate railroad bridges across three channels lakeward of Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, or construct new railroad bridges to provide suitable clearance. A small-boat harbor in vicinity of Peoria, IL, by construction of a basin 510 by 250 feet, dredged to 7 feet deep. $48,933 to reimburse Nutwood Drainage and Levee District for additional pumping operation; supplementing $58,750 authorized in October 1943 act. Federal participation in alteration of highway bridges, Calumet-Sag Modification, Part I, which constitute unreasonable obstructions to navigation, in accordance with Public Law 647, 76th Cong., as amended. Federal participation in alteration of highway bridges, Calumet-Sag Modification, Part II, which constitute unreasonable obstructions to navigation, in accordance with the Public Law 647, 76th Cong., as amended. Illinois River at Peoria, IL modification of navition project to include an adjacent downstream water area. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, IL, IA, MN, MO, WI 15-12 H. Doc. 677, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 698, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 144, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 45, 85th Cong., 1st sess.4 Specified in Act. Also H. Doc. 45, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 857, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. November 17, 1986 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 6. August 15, 1985 Provide for a 10-year environmental program to H. Doc. 2577, 99th Cong., (P.L. 99-88) Novemer 17, 1986 7. June 28, 1938 July 14, 1960 8. August 15, 1985 (P.L. 99-88) include habitat rehabilitation and enhancement; longterm resource monitoring with computerized inventory and analysis; recreational development; assessment of economic benefits from recreational activities; and navigation system traffic monitoring. Approves 1982 Upper Mississippi River Master Plan, authorizes interstate agreements between Upper Mississippi River states, directs Secretary to imple- GREAT II recommendations for disposal of dredged material and facilitate the productive use of dredge material, directs and interagency agreement with the Department of Interior for its participation in the plan, authorizes second lock at Lock and Dam No. 6. CORALVILLE LAKE, IA Reservoir for flood control and recreation. Highway bridge across Coralville Lake at or near the Mehaffey site. DES MOINES RECREATIONAL RIVER AND GREENBELT, IA Recreational development; environmental enhancement; and related streambank stabilization. November 17, 1986 Defines area of work. 9. 1944 Flood Control Act FARM CREK, IL Two flood detention dams and channel improvements. LOVES PARK, IL 10. November 17, 1986 Improved channel, pumping plant and pond storage. 11. June 28, 1938 RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IA Reservoir for flood control and recreation. December 19, 1985 Land Acquisition 12. July 3, 1958 October 22, 1976 SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA Reservoir for flood control and recreation. Modification to minimize adverse project impact on Ledges State Park. 1st sess. Sec. 1103, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 2577, 99th Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 604, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. H. Doc. 802, 78th Cong., 2nd sess. Sec. 401, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. PL 99-190 S. Doc. 9, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 487, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. 15-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents WEST DES MOINES, IA 13. November 17, 1986 Construct levees and floodwall. Sec. 401, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 MUSCATINE ISLAND LEVEE DISTRICT AND MUSCATINE-LOUISA COUNTY DRAINAGE DISTRICT, NO. 13, IA 19. November 17, 1986 Raise existing levees Sec. 401, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. 1. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 2. Contains latest published map of Illinois and Des Plaines Rivers. 3. Included, in part, in Public Works Administrative Program October 31, 1934, and February 28, 1935. 4. Contains latest published maps of Calumet - Sy portion. 15-14 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 6 of Text) Cost To September 30, 1998 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Hannibal SBH, MO Completed 1958 $ 108,700' $152,262 Squaw Chute at Quincy, IL Completed 1967 70,979' 9,345 Muscooten Bay, Illinois River, IL Completed 1985 265,4993 171,000 Quincy, IL, Harbor Acces Channel Completed 1970 35,4772 37,700 Muscatine Harbor, IA Completed 1964 353,000 356,061 1. Excludes $25,851 contributed funds. 2. Excludes $35,350 contributed funds. 15-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 15-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 15 of Text) Cost To September 30, 1998 For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Completed Projects Banner Special Drainage and Levee Districts, IL 1943 $ 247,822 -- -- Bear Creek Dam (City of Hannibal, MO) 1962 1,679,056 -- -- Bettendorf, IA 1987 14,930,085 -- $ 228,073 Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL 1943 144,910 -- -- Canton, MO' 1964 1,496,555 -- -- Clinton, IA 1991 26,237,690 -- 839,615 Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1954 1,923,145 -- -- Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 68,898 -- -- Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, MO 1969 1,492,016 -- -- Des Moines, IA 1972 4,993,224 -- 23,323 Drury Drainage District, IL 1964 1,144,875 -- -- Dubuque, IA 1974 10,861,170 -- 145,415 East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 207,826 -- -- East Moline, IL 1984 9,692,097 -- -- East Peoria Drainage and Levee District, IL 1946 279,963 -- -- Elkport, IA 1951 34,200 -- -- Evansdale, IA 1983 4,409,088 -- -- Fabius River Drainage District, MO 1941 60,500 -- -- Fabius River Drainage District, MO 1963 1,621,841 -- -- Farm Creek, IL 1997 9,859,020 4,904,088 -- Farmers Levee and Drainage District, IL 1942 155,562 -- -- Fulton, IL 1984 18,017,200 -- -- Galena, IL 1952 844,100 -- 118,000 Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA 1949 299,000 -- -- Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA 1967 1,727,711 -- -- Gregory Drainage District, MO 1940 77,100 -- -- Gregory Drainage District, MO 1972 1,538,963 -- 20,626 Hannibal, MO 1993 6,059,334 -- 600,000 Henderson County Drainage District No. 1, IL 1968 1,453,217 -- -- Henderson County Drainage District No. 2, IL 1968 1,043,902 -- -- Henderson County Drainage District No. 3, IL 1949 42,700 -- -- Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, IL 1940 109,593 -- -- Hunt Drainage District and Lima Lake Drainage District, IL 1972 4,772,498 -- -- Indian Grave Drainage District, IL 1972 3,551,961 -- -- Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, IA 1972 6,044,693 -- -- Kishwaukee River at DeKalb, IL' 1957 123,300 -- -- Lacey Langellier, West Mantanzas and Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL 1954 1,290,000 -- -- Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL 1943 117,731 -- -- Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1938 152,000 -- -- Marengo, IA' 1981 2,447,001 -- -- Marion County Drainage District, MO 1967 873,748 -- -- Marshalltown, IA 1978 8,437,511 -- 252,136 Mason and Menard Drainage District, IL 1940 93,808 -- -- Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, IL' 1977 1,995,322 -- 269,739 Milan, IL 1988 13,437,663 -- 213,554 15-16 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) (See Section 15 of Text) Cost To September 30, 1998 For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Muscatine, Mad Creek, IA' 1983 1,129,800 -- -- Muscatine Island Levee District and Muscatine- Louisa County Drainage District No. 13, IA 1970 3,293,276 -- 220,000 Near Springfield on Sangamon River, IL 1941 -- -- -- Oakford Special Drainage District, IL 1940 38,417 -- -- Okabena Creek at Worthington, MN' 1957 72,432 -- -- Ottumwa, IA 1977 233,145 -- -- Pekin and La Marsh Drainage and Levee District, IL 1955 158,383 -- -- Penny Slough, Rock River, IL 1940 85,800 -- -- Rock Island, IL 1979 7,582,373 -- -- Rockford, IL 1989 10,032,496 -- 514,188 Rocky Ford Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 108,797 -- -- Sabula, IA 1958 411,915 -- -- Sangamon River (Mouth), IL 1980 1,048,990 272,848 15,122 Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, IL 1945 32,281 -- -- Sid Simpson Project, IL 1968 5,789,800 -- -- Sny Basin, IL 1972 14,003,560 -- -- Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL 1942 61,400 -- -- Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL 1968 4,956,749 -- -- South Beardstown and Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL 1942 220,729 -- -- South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, IL 1942 171,839 -- -- South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL 1940 61,200 -- -- South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL 1968 1,231,243 -- -- South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL 1991 7,066,437 -- 2,355,479 South River Drainage District, MO 1941 55,300 -- -- South River Drainage District, MO 1966 1,106,056 -- -- Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 185,980 -- -- Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage Union No. 1 and Bay Island Drainage and Levee District No. 1, IL 1967 3,306,695 -- -- Union Township Drainage District, MO 1947 116,576 -- -- Van Meter, IA' 1965 113,842 -- -- Waterloo, IA 1987 48,620,099 -- 83,300 Waterloo Bridges, IA 1991 1,125,000 -- 1,108,787 Authorized Projects Not Constructed Ames Dam and Reservoir, Skunk River, IA 1987 1,400,800 -- -- Davenport, IA 1987 -- -- -- Moline, IL2 1987 -- -- -- Peoria, IL 1973 534,580 -- -- Rock River Agricultural Levees, IL 1984 858,000 -- -- 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act). 2. FY 89 funds of $5,639 were expended to close out project. 15-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 15-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Cal.-Sag Channel, Part II Illinois Waterway, IL and IN 1986 1986 -- -- Campbells Island Mississippi River, IL 1969 1979 $76,664 -- Carroll County Levee and Drainage District, IL 1938 1977 -- -- Central City Lake, Wapsipinicon River, IA 1970 1977 55,664 -- Farmers Drainage and Levee District (Sangamon River), IL 1942 1986 -- -- Green Island Levee and Drainage District, IA 1938 1977 -- -- Henderson River, IL 1964 1977 102,310 -- Illinois Waterway, IL and IN Duplicate Locks 1982 1981 -- -- Illinois Waterway Navigation Project (Pekin, IL) 1986 1986 -- -- Janesville and Indian Ford Dams, WI 1938 1977 -- -- Keithsburg Drainage District, IL 1938 1977 -- -- Pecatonica River at Darlington, WI -- 1977 -- -- Rochester Lake, Cedar River, IA -- 1977 -- -- South Beloit, IL 1979 1986 270,000 -- William L. Springer Lake Decatur, IL 1979 1986 -- -- Illinois Waterway, Marseilles Canal, IL 1989 1990 -- -- Peoria Levees, IL -- 1990 -- -- 15-18 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 14 of Text) Date Project Inspected Alpine Dam and Page Park Dam, Rockford, IL Banner Special Drainage and Levee District, IL Bear Creek Reservoir, Hannibal, MO Bay Island Drainage and Levee District, IL Bettendorf, IA Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL Burlington, IA Canton, MO Clinton, IA Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL DeKalb, IL Des Moines, IA Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, MO Des Moines County DD7, IA Des Moines County DD8, IA Drury Drainage District, IL Dubuque, IA East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL East Moline, IL East Peoria Drainage and Levee District, IL East Peoria Sanitary District, IL Elkport, IA Evansdale, IA Fabius River Drainage District, MO Farmers Drainage and Levee District, IL Fulton, IL Galena, IL Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA Gregory Drainage District, MO Hannibal, MO Henderson County Drainage District No. 1, IL Henderson County Drainage District No. 2, IL Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, IL Herget Drainage and Levee District, IL Hunt Drainage District & Lima Lake Drainage District, IL Indian Grave Drainage District, IL Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, IA Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL Lacey Drainage and Levee District, IL Langellier Drainage and Levee District, IL Levings Lake Dam, IL Lima DD, IL Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL Mad Creek, Muscatine, IA Marengo, IA Marion County Drainage District, MO Marshalltown, IA Mason and Menard Drainage District, IL October 1996 October 1997 December 1996 November 1996 October 1996 January 1997 October 1996 December 1996 November 1996 January 1997 March 1997 October 1996 October 1996 December 1996 November 1996 November 1996 November 1996 October 1996 February 1997 October 1996 February 1997 April 1997 October 1996 December 1996 December 1996 January 1997 November 1996 October 1996 December 1996 December 1996 February 1996 November 1996 November 1996 April 1997 April 1997 December 1996 December 1996 November 1996 January 1997 January 1997 January 1997 October 1996 December 1996 January 1997 November 1997 October 1996 October 1996 December 1996 October 1996 February 1997 15-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 15-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) (See Section 14 of Text) Date Project Inspected Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, IL November 1996 Milan, IL November 1996 Muscatine Island, L&DD, & Louisa DD No. 13, IA November 1996 Oakford Special Drainage and Levee District, IL March 1997 Page Park Dam, IL October 1996 Pekin-LaMarsh Drainage and Levee District, IL January 1997 Penny Slough Drainage and Levee District, IL November 1996 Rock Island, IL October 1996 Rock Island Arsenal, IL December 1995 Sabula, IA December 1996 Sanitary District of Beardstown, IL January 1997 Savanna Ordinance Depot, IL December 1996 Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, IL November 1997 Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL December 1996 South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, IL November 1997 South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL December 1996 South River Drainage District, MO December 1996 Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL April 1997 Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage District Union No. 1 and Bay Island Levee and Drainage District No. 1, IL November 1996 Tama, IA October 1996 The Sny Basin, IL March 1996 Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL April 1997 Van Meter, IA October 1996 Volga, IA October 1996 Waterloo, IA October 1996 West Matanzas Drainage and Levee District, IL January 1997 Worthington, MN September 1996 15-20 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-I FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Project FISCAL YEAR COSTS Federal Cost Non-Federal Total Flood Control (Section 205, P. L. 858) Cedar River, Cedar River City, IA Cedar River, Plainfield, IA East Peoria, IL Liverpool, IL Mud Creek, Muscatine Oelwein, Fayette County, IA Ottawa, IL Raccoon River, Des Moines, IA Section 205 Coordination $ 753,000 10,699 2,470 878,000 10,171 -13,362 378,278 3,162 9.860 Snagging and Clearing (Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, P.L. 780) DeKalb, IL Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, P.L. 526) Mahaska County Road, G71 Middle Fabius River Lewis County Road 582, MO Section 14 Coordination Account South River, Marion County Road 402, MO West Fork, Des Moines River, MN Emergency Flood Control Activities (P.L. 99) Disaster Preparedness Program Emergency Operations Rehabilitation O&M Emergency Supplement 44,052 797,052 10,699 1,808 4,278 85,384 963,384 10,171 13,362 -- 378,278 3,162 9.860 2,032,278 144,606 2,166,185 29,744 29,744 23,439 23,439 6,218 6,218 8,505 8,505 86,406 38,717 125,123 24,598 24,598 149,166 38,717 187,883 318,030 318,030 1,322,217 1,322,217 773,280 773,280 717,751 717,751 3,131,278 3,131,278 15-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 15-J ILLINOIS WATERWAY: EXISTING LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 2 of Text) Depth on Dimensions Miter Sills Available Lift at at Low Water Miles Width of Length for Low Above Chamber Full Width Water' Lower Upper Lock Mouth Miles to Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) LaGrange Lock 80.2 7.8 below Beardstown, IL 110 600 10.0 13.0 15.5 Peoria Lock 157.7 4.1 below Peoria, IL 110 600 11.0 12.0 15.5 Starved Rock Lock 231.0 Utica, IL 110 600 18.5 14.0 16.8 Marseilles Lock 244.6 Marseilles, IL 110 600 24.45 14.0 18.6 Dresden Island Lock 271.5 8 above Morris, IL 110 600 21.75 12.25 16.85 Brandon Road Lock 286.0 Joliet, IL 110 600 34.0 13.8 17.85 Lockport Lock 291.1 Lockport, IL 110 600 30.5-39.52 15.0 11.0-20.22 T.J. O'Brien Lock 326.5 Chicago, IL 110 1,000 -- 14.0 14.0 1. Lifts and depth on miter sills are those obtained with flat pools. 2. Variation in lift and depth on upper miter sill at Lockport is due to fluctuation of water surface in the sanitary district canal. 15-22 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-K ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN LOCK AND DAM CONSTRUCTION, FOUNDATIONS, COST (See Section 2 of Text) Estimated Lock Dam Federal Cost Under Type of Character of Type of Character of Year Existing Name Construction Foundation Kind Construction Foundation Complete Project Illinois River, mouth to Utica; channel improvement by dredging in Illinois River below Starved Rock modification of two U.S. locks and dams, and removal of two State dams. LaGrange Peoria -- $2,733,4991 Concrete Concrete Starved Rock Concrete Marseilles Dresden Island Brandon Road Lockport Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Piles in sand Movable (wicket with Aframe- crest) Piles in sand Movable (wicket type) Rock Movable (tainter gates) Rock Rock Rock Rock Movable (tainter gates) Movable (tainter gates) Movable (tainter gates) Movable (Bear trap) (Bear trap) Concrete and timber Concrete and timber Concrete and structural steel Concrete and structural steel Concrete and structural steel Concrete and structural steel Concrete and structural steel Piles in sand 1939 $ 2,744,592' Piles in sand 1939 Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock 1933 1933 1933 1933 1933 3,381,030' 885,315' 1,853,725' 2,503,376' 2,031,683' 133,608' T.J. O'Brien Concrete and sheet piling Piles in clay Fixed Concrete and sheet piling Piles in clay 1960 15-23 6,954,700' REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 15-K (Continued) ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN LOCK AND DAM CONSTRUCTION, FOUNDATIONS, COST (See Section 2 of Text) Estimated Lock Dam Federal Cost Under Type of Character of Type of Character of Year Existing Name Construction Foundation Kind Construction Foundation Complete Project Lock and dam -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,250,304' equipment Total locks -- -- -- -- -- -- $ 24,471,832 and dams 1. Actual cost. TABLE 15-L ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO COST (See Section 2 of Text) Dredging: Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers $ 2,135,358' Calumet-Sag, 3 passing places 813,318' Starved Rock to Lockport 6,007,335 Starved Rock to Grafton 2,917,607 Calumet-Sag Channel 19,238,200 Peoria small boat harbor 24,937' Protection piers at all locks 77,613' Calumet-Sag modification engineering and design 5,141,474 Calumet-Sag modification, supervision and administration 5,466,804 Rebuild highway bridges 19,327,850 Rebuild railway bridges: Calumet-Sag Channel 20,828,435' Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers 18,362,041' Recreation Facilities, Code 711 445,000 Removal of Blue Island lock 288,600' Grand Calumet River controlling works 2 St. Louis District 1,081,600' Total additional features $100,442,142 Total existing project $124,913,974 1. Actual cost. 2. Placed in inactive status November 19, 1974. 15-24 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-M EXISTING PROJECT See Section in Text Project Item Length (feet) Width (feet) Depth (feet) 2. Illinois Waterway, Nine locks and six dams -- -- -- IL and IN Grafton to Lockport, IL 291.1 miles 300 9 Lockport to controlling works 2.0 miles 200-300 9 Controlling works to junction with 10.0 miles 225 9 Calumet-Sag Channel Calumet-Sag Channel to lock in Blue 16.0 miles 225 9 Island Calumet and Little Calumet Channel, 7.7 miles 300 9 from Blue Island to turning basin 5 Grand Calumet River Channel from 9.0 miles 9 -- junction with Little Calumet River to and in Indiana Harbor Canal to 141st, East Chicago, IN Also, Grand Calumet River Channel 4.2 miles 160 9 from junction of Indiana Harbor Canal and Grand Calumet River to Clark St. in Gary, IN, with a turning basin at Clark St. A channel in Chicago Sanitary and 22.1 miles 175-300 9 Ship Canal and South Branch Chicago River from Sag-Junction to Lake St. in Chicago, IL TABLE 15-N ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (See Section 2 of Text) New Work Maintenance Rehabilitation Total Regular Funds $120,886,748 $408,386,088 $150,318,920 $679,591,756 Public Works Funds 3,960,735 -- -- 3,960,735 Emergency Relief Funds 1,858,936 -- -- 1,858,936 Total $126,706,419 $408,386,088 $150,318,920 $685,411,426' 1. Includes $1,735,890 expended between 1927 and 1936 on the operation and care of the works of improvement under the provisions of the permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 15-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 15-0 ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) Item and CWIS Number FISCAL YEAR COSTS Federal Cost Non-Federal Total SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention (120) Mississippi River, Quincy, IL - 010464 DesMoines & Racoon River, IA - 013490 Subtotal Special Studies (140) Peoria Riverfront Development, IL - 013410 Upper Miss. River FLD Profile Study - 013414 Illinois River Ecosystem Restoration - 014293 Subtotal Review of Authorized Projects (160) Fabius River Drainage Dist. - 013334 Coralville Lake, IA - 013335 Mississippi River Navigation Study - 010315 Subtotal Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations - 017250 Review of FERC Licenses - 053857 Interagency Water Resources Dev. - 014713 North American Waterfowl Mgmt Plan - 053904 Subtotal Coordination Studies with other Agencies (180) Cooperation w/other Water Agencies - 053907 PAS IA Water Demand & Availability - 019002 PAS-WI-Fox Lake Restoration - 055011 PAS - SAC Fox FLood Plain Map - 072001 Subtotal 74,926 26.935 74,926 26.935 101,860 101,860 70,504 70,504 1,904,206 1,904,206 3,413 3,413 1,978,123 1,978,123 1,989 1,033 6,475,247 6,478,270 1,989 1,033 6,475,247 6,478,270 14,413 3,312 19,274 4.926 14,413 3,312 19,274 4.926 41,925 41,925 3,571 3,551 790 790 1,054 1,054 2,108 34,053 48,618 82,671 39,468 49,672 89,140 TOTAL (Category 100) 8,639,645 49,672 8,689,317 15-26 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-0 ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (Continued) (96x3121) Item and CWIS Number FISCAL YEAR COSTS Federal Cost Non-Federal Total COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) FLoodplain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Mgmt Services - 082030 Technical Services - 082040 Quick Responses - 082045 Regulated Frequency Curve - 083157 17 X - 083236 Subtotal Hydrologic Studies (260) General Hydrologic Studies - 053820 Subtotal TOTAL (Category 200) 58,928 23,886 11,877 70,674 58,928 23,886 11,877 70,674 114 114 165,478 165,478 1,459 1,459 1,459 1,459 166,937 1,666,937 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (NON REIMBURSABLE) 8,806,582 49,672 8,856,254 15-27 ST. PAUL, MN DISTRICT * District comprises western Wisconsin, major portion of Minnesota, northern and eastern North Dakota, and small portions of northeastern South Dakota and northern and northeastern Iowa embracing drainage basins of Mississippi River and tributaries from its source to mile 614 above mouth of Ohio River; Red River of the North and tributaries; those streams north of Missouri River Basin in North Dakota; and U.S. waters of Lake of the Woods and its tributaries. That section of Mississippi River above mile 614 is included in report on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minnesota. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page Miscellaneous 1. Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN ......... 16-3 2. Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, MN ............ 16-3 3. Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program (UMRS-EMP) ................... 16-3 Flood Control 4. Bassett Creek, MN ................ 16-4 5. Big Fork River, MN ............... 16-4 6. Chaska, MN ..................... 16-5 7. Hennepin County, CSAH 116, MN .... 16-5 8. Homme Lake and Dam, ND ......... 16-6 9. Houston, MN .................... 16-6 10. LaFarge Lake and Channel Improvement, WI ................. 16-7 11. Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. Sheyenne River, ND ............... 16-7 Mankato Township, MN ............ 16-8 Marshall, MN ................... 16-8 Melrose, WI .................... 16-8 Portage, WI ..................... 16-9 Rochester, MN ................... 16-9 Sanders Creek, Boscobel, WI ........ 16-9 Sheyenne River, ND .............. 16-10 Souris River Basin, ND ........... 16-10 St. Croix River, Stillwater, MN ...... 16-11 St. Paul, MN ................... 16-11 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............ 16-12 23. Other Work Under Special Authority .. 24. Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies (FC & CE) ........... 25. National Emergency Preparedness Program (NEPP) ....... 26. Regulatory Functions Program ....... Page 16-12 16-12 16-12 16-12 General Investigations 27. 28. 29. Surveys ....................... Collection and Study of Basic Data .. . Advance Engineering and Design ..... 16-12 16-12 16-12 Tables Table 16-A Cost and Financial Statement 16-13 Table 16-B Authorizing Legislation .... 16-17 Table 16-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................ 16-20 Table 16-D Not Applicable Table 16-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .......... 16-21 Table 16-F Not Applicable Table 16-G Deauthorized Projects ...... 16-25 Table 16-H Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River ......... 16-26 Table 16-I Red River of the North Drainage Basin: Active Units in Comprehensive Basin Plan .............. 16-27 Table 16-J Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ..... 16-28 16-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Page Tables (cont.) Table 16-K Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ...... 16-30 Table 16-L Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment ............ 16-31 Page Table 16-M Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration ............. 16-31 Table 16-N General Investigations ..... .16-31 16-2 Tables (cont.) ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT Navigation 1. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN For report on this improvement see chapter on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minnesota. 2. RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN Location. Reservoirs are on the Mississippi River and several of its tributaries in Itasca, Beltrami, Hubbard, Aitkin, Cass and Crow Wing Counties, MN. (See Table 16-H on reservoirs.) Previous projects. For details see page 1888 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1098 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for reconstruction from timber to concrete at Winnibigoshish, Leech Lake, Pokegama, Sandy Lake and Pine River Dams, and construction of a concrete dam at Gull Lake. Pokegama was built on bedrock and the others on pile foundations. A portion of Leech Lake Dam from piers 26 to 39 was replaced with an earth fill. Constructed three dikes at Winnibigoshish, four at Pokegama, two at Sandy Lake, and 16 at Pine River. Sandy Lake Dam includes a lock 160 feet long, 30 feet wide, with a maximum lift of 9.5 feet and a depth of 2.5 feet on lower sill at low water which was converted to use as a spillway. (See Table 16-B for authorizing legislation.) The Pine River Dam main embankment consists of a timber diaphragm core and earth fill. The Pine River Dam control structure is made of reinforced concrete with a wooden sheet pile cutoff and is supported on a timber substructure. The recommended plan for improvements to the Pine River Dam for dam safety assurance includes: rehabilitation of the existing structure to include 13 new gates, concrete replacement and a sheetpile and concrete wall along the current main dam embankment. Estimated cost (1998) to the United States for new Dam Safety Assurance work at the Pine River Dam is $9,440,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None. Operation and results during fiscal year. Reservoirs were operated as required, recreation facilities and equipment maintained, and surveys, repairs, reports and data collection cost $2,971,844. Dam Safety: Erigineering and design for dam safety modifications at Pine River Dam cost $612,495. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1937. Flowage rights were acquired on all lands affected by construction, maintenance, and operation of reservoirs. A total of 1,672.26 acres in fee are owned by the United States. The United States has easements, flowage rights, and other rights of use on another 296,334.44 acres. Structures are in fair condition. Recreation facilities for public use are being constructed intermittently at all reservoir areas. (See Table 16-H for capacities and costs by reservoir.) Pine River Dam has been classified as a high hazard dam under the National Dam Safety Program due to inadequate spillway capacity which could lead to dam failure during a flood event. Engineering and design of dam safety modifications is currently underway. 3. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (UMRS-EMP) Location. The program is authorized for the commercially navigable portions of the Upper Mississippi River System. In the St. Paul District, this includes the Mississippi, Minnesota, Black, and St. Croix Rivers in the states of Minnesota, Wisconsin and Iowa. Existing project. The purpose of the UMRS-EMP as stated in the authorizing legislation is to ensure the coordinated development and enhancement of the Upper Mississippi River System, recognizing its several purposes. It is intended to protect and/or enhance the river resources and guide future river management. The primary emphasis of the program is on habitat rehabilitation and enhancement projects. Long term resource monitoring will provide the means for more informed management of the UMRS. Also authorized, was a study of the economic impacts of recreation (completed), navigation traffic monitoring (continuing under other authority), and recreation projects (unfunded). The program was initiated in FY 1986 and is authorized to continue through FY 2002. The execution of the program is being closely coordinated with the Upper Mississippi River Basin Association, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the three affected states in the St. Paul District. 16-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 See Rock Island District Tables 15-A and 15-B for total program costs and authorizing legislation. In the St. Paul District, eighteen habitat projects have been completed or substantially completed. These are the Guttenberg Waterfowl Ponds (IA), Island 42 (MN), Lake Onalaska (WI), Blackhawk Park (WI), Pool 8 Islands Phases I and II (WI), Indian Slough (WI), Finger Lakes (MN), Lansing Big Lake (IA), Cold Springs (WI), Pool 9 Island (WI), Spring Lake Peninsula (WI), Bussey Lake (IA), Peterson Lake (MN), Polander Lake Stage I (MN), East Channel (WI/MN) Rice Lake (MN), and Small Scale Drawdown (WI). The projects are being operated and maintained by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, except for Blackhawk Park which is maintained by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR). Through FY 1998, funds expended by the St. Paul District have amounted to $31,748,000 for planning, design, construction and monitoring of habitat rehabilitation and enhancement projects; $866,000 for long term resource monitoring; $768,000 for economic impacts of recreation study; and $1,905,000 for program management. The allocations for the overall program projected over a 15-year period for the St. Paul District are almost $50 million. Local cooperation. Local cooperation agreements are obtained for habitat projects of features not located on lands managed as a national wildlife refuge, as specified in Section 906(e) of the 1986 WRDA. Operations and results during fiscal year. In the St. Paul District, costs during the year totaled $3,856,559 Federal. The majority of funds were expended on the planning, design, construction and monitoring of habitat projects. Design was continued on six projects. Construction was initiated on two projects and continued on four. Construction was completed on two projects and contract award was made for construction of one project. Flood Control 4. BASSETT CREEK, MN Location. In Hennepin County and Minneapolis, Minnesota, on Bassett Creek, a tributary of the Mississippi River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The project consists of nonstructural and structural flood control measures. Nonstructural measures include continuation of existing floodplain regulations, flood insurance and forecasting, and flood warning. Principal structural measures consist of six small control structures in the upper watershed to temporarily impound flood waters and a new tunnel (part of which was constructed on a cooperative basis with the Minnesota Department of Transportation) in a highly urbanized area of Minneapolis to replace the existing tunnel outletting Bassett Creek to the Mississippi River. Also included in the project are a limited reach of channel widening, bridge removals, culvert replacements, a weir structure, a flood storage area, and a railroad bridge replacement. Project was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1977 for requirements. Under current cost sharing policies, when the costs of lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations and disposal areas (LERRD) are less than 20 percent of total project costs, local interests are required to furnish the standard local cooperation requirements plus a cash contribution, the total of the two to amount to a minimum of 25 percent of the total project costs. On June 27, 1986, the City of Minneapolis entered into a local cooperation agreement with the Department of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. Project financial closeout work was initiated. New Work: Construction on the final stage of work was completed. Total Federal costs were $10,426 and non-Federal, $0. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction has been completed on all components. The project financial closeout work is currently underway. 5. BIG FORK RIVER, MN Location. Along the left bank of the Big Fork River, Koochiching County, about 300 miles north of Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota. Existing project. The emergency streambank protection project on the Big Fork River involves approximately 500 feet of riverbank and consists of rockfill toe protection laid on geotextile and associated earthwork. The project was approved by the Engineering and Planning Directorate of the North Central Division for construction on May 18, 1995, under the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1995 for requirements. A Project Cooperation Agreement 16-4 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT was executed between the Federal Government and Koochiching County on June 23, 1995. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction was completed in FY 1997. Total FY 98 Federal costs were $404 non-Federal, $5,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. The emergency streambank protection project on the Big Fork River in Koochiching County, Minnesota is complete. 6. CHASKA, MN Location. In Carver County in south-central Minnesota on the Minnesota River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of a levee and interior drainage works along the Minnesota River, flood diversion channels on Chaska Creek and East Creek, and appropriate floodplain regulation measures. Principal project features include: approximately 1.1 miles of upgraded levee, 1.5 miles of new levee, and one pumping station on the Minnesota River; 1.1 miles of diversion channel on Chaska Creek; and 1.0 mile of diversion channel on East Creek. Approximately 2.9 miles of paved recreation trails on top of the levee and around Courthouse Lake are also included in the proposed plan. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $30,397,000 and $12,558,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. (H. Doc. 644, 94th Congress, 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1977 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was executed on Sep. 12, 1988. The agreement included cost sharing provisions in accordance with the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. Operations and results during fiscal year. Stage 3 construction is substantially complete. Stage 3A construction (final stage) is complete. Total Federal costs were $470,146 and non-Federal, $187,997. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is complete. A project dedication was held on July 28, 1998. 7. HENNEPIN COUNTY, CSAH 116, MN Location. Along the east bank of the Crow River, Hennepin County, Hassan Township, about 30 miles northwest of Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota. Existing project. The emergency streambank protection project on the Crow River involves approximately 600 feet of riverbank and consists of rockfill toe protection laid on the existing bank. The project was approved by the Engineering and Planning Directorate of the North Central Division for construction on 23 Aug. 1996 under the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1996 for requirements. A local assurance agreement was adopted by Hennepin County, the local sponsor, on Jan. 7, 1997. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction was completed in March 1997. During FY 1998 there was a credit of $-30,982, all federal. Condition at end of fiscal year. The emergency streambank protection project on the Crow River in Hennepin County, Minnesota is complete. 8. HOMME LAKE AND DAM, ND Location. Dam is on South Branch of Park River about 4 miles upstream from Park River, ND, and 62.1 miles above mouth of Park River. South, Middle, and North Branches, headwater streams of Park River, rise in Cavalier County in northeastern North Dakota and flow easterly to an almost common confluence near Grafton, ND, forming main stream which flows easterly 35 miles to join Red River of the North about 35 miles south of the international boundary. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. See Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized as Park River Reservoir by 1944 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 194, 78th Cong., 2d sess.), and redesignated Homme Reservoir and Dam by Public Law 435, 80th Congress, 2d session. Project restoration of wetland habitat conditions is taking place under the authority contained in Section 1135 of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act, as amended. Latest published maps is in project 16-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 document. A reconnaissance report was completed in 1994 under the Dam Safety Assurance Program. The report recommended adding a new spillway to increase the dam's discharge capacity to the Probable Maximum flood level. Estimated cost (1998) to the United States for new Dam Safety Assurance work is $14,600,000 and $100,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Total costs for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of project authorization, including required non- Federal contributions, were $62,800. In addition, local interests contributed $16,220 for construction of a water supply outlet through dam and incurred other costs of $19,600. The North Dakota Game and Fish Department has agreed to serve as the non-Federal sponsor for the environmental improvement to the project. According to current Dam Safety cost sharing guidance, the local sponsors are required to fund 15 percent of the dam safety improvement costs in the same proportion as the original construction was cost shared. The local sponsors would therefore pay for 4.5 percent of 15 percent or 0.68 percent of the dam safety costs. The North Dakota Office of the State Engineer has supported the proposed modifications identified in the Reconnaissance Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Structure was operated, maintained, inspected and evaluations were performed at a cost of $121,234. Dam Safety: Engineering and design cost $115,573, all Federal. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed in June 1956 except for additional recreational facilities which have been done intermittently since that time. Construction began in April 1948 and major structures completed in May 1951. Structures are in good condition. Government has acquired 395 acres of land in fee and easements over 7.8 acres of land for project. An additional 6.3 acres of land have been donated for recreational development and 3.75 acres have been acquired due to bank erosion bordering the project. Construction of a habitat improvement project (under Section 1135 authority) was completed and the project was turned over to the local sponsor, the North Dakota Fish and Game Department. Homme Dam has been classified as a high hazard dam under the National Dam Safety Program due to inadequate spillway capacity which could lead to dam failure during a flood event. Engineering and design of dam safety modifications is underway. 9. HOUSTON, MN Location. The project is located in the city of Houston, in Houston County, in southeastern Minnesota. The city of Houston is adjacent to the Root River, which is a tributary to the Mississippi River. The city is bounded by floodplain agricultural land to the west and east, and by steep bluffs to the south and by the Root River to the north. Existing project. The flood control project is designed to provide protection to the city of Houston against the 100-year flood on the Root River. There are currently two levee systems in the vicinity of Houston; neither of which provides adequate protection against the 100-year flood. Proposed measures to provide 100-year flood protection to the city of Houston include: A levee system, two fullheight road raises; and a sandbag closure. To ease the constriction at the Hwy 76 bridge, an existing portion of the MnDOT levee will be removed, and a highflow channel will be constructed on the north bank of the Root River. The project also includes construction of two ponding areas to supplement existing interior ponding, three interior gravity outlets, one exterior gravity outlet and a ditch constructed between the levee and the Root River to carry gravity flow from outlet A-1. The project was approved for construction under Section 401 of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act (PL 99-662), as amended; and is also authorized under Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended; and Section 4 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1995 for requirements. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed between the Federal Government and the city of Houston on Feb. 15, 1995. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Completed work includes the construction of a high-flow channel in the Root River; substantial completion of the levee upstream of the Hwy 76 bridge, including the US Hwy 16 and CSAH 13 road raises; partial completion of ponding area A-i, and substantial completion of the interior drainage outlet ditch to the Root River. Federal costs were $1,099,180 and non-Federal $343,341. 16-6 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. Stage 2A (ponding area) construction is complete. Stage 1 (channel work) construction is complete. Stage 2B (levees) construction contract has been awarded and is substantially complete. 10. LA FARGE LAKE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, WI Location. On the Kickapoo River which rises in Monroe County in southwestern Wisconsin and flows south and southwest through Vernon, Richland, and Crawford Counties emptying into Wisconsin River about 16 miles above junction of latter stream with Mississippi River. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) Existing project. See Annual Report for 1996 for flood control dam and impoundment project authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (WRDA 96) authorized a modification to the original project to include transfer of approximately 8,569 acres of project lands to the State of Wisconsin and the Secretary of the Interior to be held in trust for the Ho- Chunk Nation. The Ho-Chunk Nation is to receive up to 1,200 acres of lands that are of cultural and religious significance. The modification also includes deauthorizing the construction of the reservoir and dam, while completing other features of the original project. Estimated Federal cost for work authorized by WRDA 96 is $17,000,000. Local cooperation. None required for construction of La Farge Lake. See Annual Report for 1967 for requirements for local protection works. A Project Cooperation Agreement is not required for the land transfer. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated and maintained at a cost of $95,493. New Work: Work associated with WRDA 96 project was accomplished at a cost of $241,024. Condition at end of fiscal year. See Annual Report for 1996 for status of work authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Activities are underway in support ofdeauthorization of the La Farge project and the transfer of project lands out of Federal ownership. 11. LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALDHILL DAM, SHEYENNE RIVER, ND Location. Baldhill Dam is on the Sheyenne River, 16 miles upstream from Valley City, ND, and about 271 miles above mouth. Sheyenne River rises in central North Dakota and flows 500 miles generally southeast to enter Red River of the North about 10 miles north of Fargo, ND. (For general location see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. See Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1944 (S. Doc. 193, 78th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Estimated cost (1998) to the United States for Major Rehabilitation is $7,650,000. Estimated cost (1998) to the United States for new Dam Safety Assurance work is $14,700,000 and $260,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Reservoir above Baldhill Dam was designated as Lake Ashtabula by Public Law 772, 81st Congress, 2d session. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1962. Complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Major Rehabilitation: Engineering and design on Stage 4 replacement of permanent operation equipment was completed. Total Federal costs were $524,708. Dam Safety: Stage 2 construction contract was closed out. Total Federal costs were $291,562 and non-Federal costs, $20,000. Maintenance: Project was operated, maintained, inspected, investigated, monitored and evaluations were performed at a cost of $1,122,258. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed in March 1956 except construction of recreational facilities which is being accomplished intermittently. United States owns 7,816.5 acres of land in fee and easements on 666.2 acres. Construction initiated in July 1947 and major features completed in November 1950. Dam was placed in permanent operation in spring of 1951. Structures are in good condition. Baldhill Dam has been classified as a large, high hazard dam under the National Program for the inspection of dams. A risk assessment report prepared in June 1986 indicated a serious spillway discharge capacity deficiency. Construction of dam safety and major rehabilitation 16-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 modifications is currently underway. This work is being accomplished in five stages. In July 1994, the first stage of construction of the dam safety and major rehabilitation modifications was started. Stage 1 was completed in June 1995. Stage 2 was completed in September 1997. Stage 3 was completed in June 1997. 12. MANKATO TOWNSHIP, MN Location. Along the right bank of the Le Sueur River, Mankato Township, about 70 miles southwest of Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota. Existing project. The emergency streambank protection project on the Le Sueur River involves approximately 300 feet of riverbank and consists of rockfill toe protection placed on the slope from the channel bottom up to the roadway. The project was approved by the Engineering and Planning Directorate of the North Central Division for construction on Apr. 26, 1995 under the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed between the Federal Government and Mankato Township on Nov. 16, 1995. See Annual Report for 1996 for requirements. A local assurance agreement was adopted by Mankato Township, the local sponsor, on Nov. 16, 1995. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Project is complete. Federal costs were $-6,040, non-Federal $6,071. Condition at end of fiscal year. The emergency streambank protection project on the Le Sueur River in Mankato Township, Minnesota was turned over to the local sponsor on Aug. 15, 1997. 13. MARSHALL, MN Location. In Lyon County in southwestern Minnesota along the Redwood River about 68 miles above its confluence with the Minnesota River at the city of Marshall, Minnesota. (For general location see Geological Survey map for Minnesota.) Existing project. See page 1059 of Annual Report for 1964 for completed channel improvement project authorized by 1960 Flood Control Act. Federal costs amounted to $1,802,866. The existing flood control project was completed in 1963. In response to a need for additional flood control, a feasibility study was completed in 1979. The project recommended in the feasibility report was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99- 662, Section 401(a) and reauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1988, Public Law 100- 676. Improvements include 4.7 miles of additional levees, 3.8 miles of bank protection, 0.3 mile of new high-flow diversion channel, an interbasin overflow structure, modifications to the existing diversion and drop structures, and a recreation plan. The project would provide protection against a flood having an occurrence interval of about once in 115 years. Estimated Federal cost (1998) for new work is $7,570,000 and $2,730,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Project was transferred to local interests on Dec. 23, 1963. For new work, see Annual Report for 1985 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was executed on Sep. 9, 1996. The agreement included cost sharing provisions in accordance with the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Stage 1 construction contract was completed. Engineering and design for Stage 2 (final stage) is complete. Federal costs were $408,816, Non-Federal $243,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of completed work was initiated August 1962 and completed December 1963. The first stage of construction for new work is complete. Plans and specifications for the final stage of work are complete. 14. MELROSE, WI Location. Along the west side of the Black River, Jackson County, about 120 miles northwest of Madison, Wisconsin. Existing project. The emergency streambank protection project on the Black River involves placing approximately 500 feet of rockfill toe protection on the river bank. The project was approved by the Engineering and Planning Directorate of the North Central Division for construction on Aug. 23, 1996, under the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. 16-8 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1996 for requirements. A local assurance agreement was adopted by Jackson County, the local sponsor, on Jan. 16, 1997. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction was completed in 1997. FY 98 costs were $-12,622 Federal and $19,856 Non-Federal. Condition at end of fiscal year. The emergency streambank protection project on the Black River near Melrose, Wisconsin is complete. 15. PORTAGE, WI Location. In Columbia County in central Wisconsin along the Wisconsin River about 35 miles north of Madison, Wisconsin. (For general location see Geological Survey map for Wisconsin.) Existing project. The recommended plan provides for improvement to the existing levee system along the left bank of the Wisconsin River at Portage. The plan includes 1.2 miles of existing levee improvement; 1.6 miles of new levee; one highway and one railroad closure; cultural mitigation; and recreation features. The project would protect against a flood having an occurrence interval of about once in 100 years. Estimated Federal cost (1998) for new work is $7,130,000 and $2,590,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99- 662). Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1989 for requirements. A Project Cooperation Agreement between the city of Portage and the Federal Government was executed in October 1996. The agreement included cost sharing provisions in accordance with the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract which was awarded in July 1997 continued. Federal costs were $3,867,502, Non-Federal $582,386. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction to improve the existing levee system is underway. 16. ROCHESTER, MN Location. In Olmsted County in southeastern Minnesota on the South Fork of the Zumbro River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for stream channel modifications and levees functioning in combination with a system of seven headwaters reservoirs. Principal features, in addition to the reservoirs, include 5.7 miles of riprapped or gabion-lined channels, 0.7 mile of architecturally-treated concrete channels, 0.5 mile of dredged channel, three drop structures, 1.3 miles of levee, and 6.5 miles of hiking and biking trails and non-structural features. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and reauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (H. Doc. 156, 93rd Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1974 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was signed Aug. 27, 1987 by the city of Rochester. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Work continued on project closeout activities. Total Federal costs were $34,034 and non-Federal costs were $0. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is complete. Project has been transferred to the local sponsor. 17. SANDERS CREEK, BOSCOBEL, WI Location. Boscobel is located in north central Grant County in southwestern Wisconsin, approximately 70 miles west of Madison, Wisconsin. This project addresses flooding problems from Sanders Creek, which flows through the center of Boscobel and enters the Wisconsin River about one mile west of the city. Existing project. The project is designed to increase flow capacity to protect against a one percent flood event on Sanders Creek. Major features of the project include regrading about 1/2 mile of the existing overflow channel, replacement of the Kansas Street bridge, demolition of the Bluff Street bridge, with a drop structure constructed at the old Bluff Street bridge site, and replacement of the railroad bridge timber piers with concrete monoliths. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction in October 1991 under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. In addition, at 100 percent non-Federal expense, a new bridge deck and 16-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 approaches were added to the Bluff Street drop structure design. Local cooperation. See Annual Report of 1993 for requirements. The city of Boscobel agreed to serve as the non-Federal sponsor for this project. A Local Cooperation Agreement between the Department of the Army and city of Boscobel was fully executed on Dec. 19, 1991. Operations and results during the fiscal year. New Work: Construction is complete. Federal cost was $4,035. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. The project was turned over to the local sponsor in May 1997. 18. SHEYENNE RIVER, ND Location. The Sheyenne River Basin is included in 16 counties in the southeastern portion of North Dakota and drains an area of 7,140 square miles into the Red River of the North near Fargo, North Dakota. The principal area of flood damages in the basin is located at the lower end within Cass County and the city of West Fargo. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. The project as authorized by the 1986 Water Resources Development Act consists of three major components for Federal implementation: 1) 11.9 miles of levee and a 6.7 mile flood diversion channel at West Fargo; 2) 7.5 miles of flood diversion channel from Horace to West Fargo; and 3) a fivefoot raise of the Baldhill Dam flood control pool. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 stipulated that the project shall also include a dam and reservoir of approximately 35,000 acre-feet of storage for the purpose of flood protection on the Maple River. There are several items of local cooperation required to implement the plan, and several components identified for non-Federal implementation which would supplement the recommended plan. Estimated cost (1998) to the United States for new work is $29,240,000 and $12,310,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. Project consists of three separable components each requiring a local cooperation agreement. The Southeast Cass Water Resource District is the local sponsor for the West Fargo Unit and the Horace to West Fargo Unit. The local cooperation agreement for the West Fargo Unit was executed on July 25, 1988, and for the Horace to West Fargo unit on Mar. 6, 1990. The Sheyenne River Joint Water Resource District has been formed to serve as the sponsor for the Baldhill Dam flood control pool raise unit. The Maple River Reservoir Unit has been deleted from the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design continued on Baldhill Dam flood control pool raise component. Flood damage repair continued on the West Fargo and Horace components. Total Federal costs were $666,630. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of both the West Fargo and Horace to West Fargo Units are essentially complete. Both of these units were operated during the spring and summer floods of 1993 and the spring floods in 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997 and performed very well although some erosion damage was sustained on both projects. Evaluation of real estate needs, design of the structural modifications and coordination with the Sheyenne River Joint Water Resource District for the raise of the flood pool at Baldhill Dam, is ongoing. The Maple River Reservoir unit has been deleted from the project due to lack of economic justification. 19. SOURIS RIVER BASIN, ND Location. On the Souris River in Ward, Renville, McHenry, and Bottineau Counties in northwestern North Dakota. The existing Lake Darling Dam is located about 20 miles northwest of Minot, North Dakota. The project also includes features at the communities of Sawyer and Velva and at various locations along the 358-mile U.S. portion of the Souris River. (For general location see Geolgical Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. The plan of improvement authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 is the one-time purchase of 377,800 acre-feet of flood storage in Rafferty and Alameda Dams in Saskatchewan, Canada and the operation of these dams with the existing Boundary Dam and Lake Darling Dam to provide 100-year flood protection at Minot, North Dakota. The Act also authorizes those flood control measures upstream and downstream of the dam which are necessary for effective operation of the project. The 4-foot raise of the Lake Darling design pool (authorized by Section III of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1982, 16-10 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT PL 97-88) and the construction of Burlington Dam (authorized by PL 91-611) was deauthorized Mar. 10, 1995, with the completion of the structures in Canada. An International Agreement between Canada and the United States was signed in October 1989. The work under the current plan authorized by PL 99-662, consists of two reservoirs in Saskatchewan, Canada (known as the Rafferty and Alameda projects); a modified outflow structure at Lake Darling Dam; a flood warning system for Minot; levee and channel improvements at Sawyer and six subdivisions from Burlington to Minot; levee and diversion channel at Renville County Park; flood proofing of about 90 rural homes in the basin and the purchase of flowage easements; modifications to dams 87 and 96 in the Upper Souris National Wildlife Refuge; and modifications to dams 320, 326, 332, 341, and 357 in the J. Clark Salyer National Wildlife Refuge. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $109,260,000 and $8,180,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1983 for requirements. Representatives of the water resource districts from Ward, Renville, McHenry, and Bottineau Counties area agreed to become members of a Souris River Joint Board for flood control, which would serve as local sponsor for the project. A local cooperation agreement for construction at Velva was signed in November 1984. A local cooperation agreement for the remainder of the project as authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 was signed in October 1989. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction was completed on the final stage of work at Lake Darling Dam. Total costs, all Federal, were $772,630. Maintenance: Total cost was $251,636. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the channel and levee improvement work at Velva, Sawyer, Renville County Park and Burlington to Minot Stages 1, 2, and 3 is complete. Construction at Rafferty Dam and Alameda Dam is complete. Construction on rural improvements Stage I and Stage 2, road raises and acquisitions, is complete. Construction on improvements to Fish and Wildlife Service refuge dams is complete. Lake Darling Dam construction is complete. The project dedication ceremony was held on May 27, 1998. 20. ST. CROIX RIVER, STILLWATER, MN Location. In Washington County in eastern Minnesota along the St. Croix River about 18 miles northeast of St. Paul, Minnesota. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota). Existing project. The proposed plan provides for repair of the existing 1000-foot retaining wall system, construction of a 1300-foot extension to the wall and expansion of the wall system to include a new secondary landward seepage wall to aid in flood protection for the downtown area. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $8,700,000 and $2,900,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-580) as amended by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-303). Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1996 for requirements. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed between the Federal Government and the city of Stillwater, Minnesota on Apr. 22, 1996 which covered Stage I of the project. An amendment to the Project Cooperation Agreement to encompass Stage II was executed on September 29, 1998. An amendment to encompass Stage III will be negotiated and executed if warranted. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Stage I construction work was completed. Engineering and design of Stage II continued. Total costs were $54,673 Federal, and $177,646 non- Federal. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction to repair the existing retaining wall system, Stage I, is complete. Preparation of plans and specifications of the extension of the retaining wall to the north, Stage II, is in progress. The first construction contract for Stage II was scheduled for award in Oct. 98. A study of the economic feasibility of Stage III has been initiated. 21. ST. PAUL, MN Location. In Ramsey County at St. Paul, Minnesota, on the Mississippi River. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) 16-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Previous project. For details see page 27-20 of Annual Report for 1974. Existing project. Since completion of the St. Paul and South St. Paul flood control project in 1964, the protected area has experienced two floods greater than the previous flood of record. The plan of protection provides for a nominal 4-foot barrier raise along the existing project alignment. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662) and reauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-640). Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. The local cooperation agreement was executed on Aug. 22, 1991. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Completion of the Operation and Maintenance manuals and other project close out activities. Total Federal costs were $8,368. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. 22. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood control projects turned over to local interests were inspected to determine that project channels are kept clean and unobstructed, dikes and revetments are in good condition, and structures are in good repair and operable. Deficiencies, if any, were minor unless noted. (See Table 16-J on inspection of completed flood control projects.) Cost for the period was $133,174. Total cost to Sep. 30, 1998 is $1,977,833. Miscellaneous 23. OTHER WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITY In the Aquatic Plant Control program (Section 302, Public Law 298, 89th Congress) there were costs of $176 in the program management. 24. FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES (FC & CE) Disaster Preparedness Emergency Operations Rehabilitation and Inspection Program Advanced Measures Total FC & CE $ 322,028 785,982 283,752 18,593,738 $19,985,500 25. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM (NEPP) Local Mobilization Preparedness National Mobilization Emergency Operations Center Support Total NEPP $22,932 20,805 17,890 $61,627 26. REGULATORY FUNCTIONS PROGRAM Permit Evaluation Enforcement Environmental Impact Statements Total Regulatory $2,836,569 901,444 519,349 $4,257,362 General Investigations 27. SURVEYS Fiscal year cost was $604,638 which included one flood damage prevention study, two special studies, miscellaneous activities, and coordination with both Federal and non-Federal agencies. Table 16-N provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 28. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year cost was $399,338 which included the items concerning international water studies, flood plain Management services and hydrologic studies. Table 16-N provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 29. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Fiscal year cost was $4,185,190 which included two local protection projects. Table 16-N provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 16-12 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 16-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 1998 2. Reservoirs at Headquarters of Mississippi River, MN 4. Bassett Creek, MN (Contributed Funds) 5. Big Fork River, MN (Contributed Funds) 6. Chaska, MN (Contributed Funds) 7. Hennepin County, CSAH 116, MN 8. Homme Lake and Dam, ND New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maj. Rehab: Approp. Cost Dam Safety: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost -- -- -- -- 4,398,628 -- -- -- -- 4,398,628' 3,071,000 3,089,500 2,635,416 3,011,447 55,593,023 3,403,215 3,095,096 2,658,766 2,971,844 55,475,3202 -- -- -- -- 425,000 -- -- -- -- 425,000 300,000 340,000 833,000 540,000 12,901 625,346 754,546 612,495 617,000 767,958 150,000 96,072 248,428 25,000 50,000 63,000 156,000 46,903 146,062 64,200 --. 49,305 80,000 64,795 20,000 44,400 84,800 108,758 -22,819 2,013,000 2,005,288 -- 29,419,000 10,426 29,413,5843 2,141,000 2,129,674 325,800 404 318,585 5,000 64,200 31,486 2,104,000 3,537,000 3,066,000 475,000 31,139,000 5,261,425 4,043,260 2,916,251 470,146 30,975,0284 400,000 400,000 185,000 15,000 4,295,000 819,173 355,261 208,116 187,997 4,279,621 12,000 14,320 -10,000 642 30,000 134,300 -66,600 19,289 109,707 -30,982 134,700 134,614 -- 1,419,097 -- 1,419,0975 190,000 338,500 177,000 118,000 4,082,056 206,995 336,860 176,325 121,234 4,080,827 16-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 16-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Cost Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 1998 (Contributed Funds) 1135 authority 9. Houston, MN (Contributed Funds) 10. La Farge Lake and Channel Imp., WI 11. Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, ND (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds) 12. Mankato Township, MN (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost Dam Safety Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost Dam Safety Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost -1,697 --. 7,453 7,453 300,000 500,000 371,000 290,665 508,798 259,984 40,000 1,211,000 115,573 1,175,020 264,768 586,400 2,229,600 153,200 5,033,968 256,366 545,566 1,323,627 1,099,180 5,003,7516 155,000 109,024 86,000 420,000 88,946 343,341 661,000 541,311 94,000 670,000 19,406,000 91,637 241,024 18,974,661 36,000 40,106 41,000 122,000 41,188 122,095 96,000 95,493 862,457 860,968 -- -- -- 3,325,638 -- -- -- 3,325,638 1,126,000 1,158,000 936,000 1,110,000 24,790,531 1,144,802 1,141,641 928,263 1,122,258 24,774,021 -- -- -- -- 208,000 -- -- --.-- 208,000 2,429,000 1,243,000 331,000 643,000 5,335,000 2,038,691 1,711,516 334,098 524,708 5,198,322 6,692,000 376,000 2,837,000 270,000 14,201,000 3,806,561 3,836,569 2,798,322 291,562 14,172,355 50,000 50,000 44,000 36,772 85,000 81,000 154,000 62,009 87,000 5,620 18,000 20,000 22,000 20,000 99,375 4,218 79,527 -7,800 -6,040 6,071 243,000 242,000 215,200 242,000 91,218 91,218 16-14 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 16-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Cost Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 1998 13. Marshall, MN New Work: Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 14. Melrose, WI New Work: Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 15. Portage, WI New Work: Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost -- 850,000 379,000 470,000 4,893 190,035 1,035,577 408,816 -- -- 510,000 175,000 -- -- 300,000 243,000 14,000 17,561 41,000 201,000 -51,400 18,880 184,519 -12,622 -- 84,000 -24,145 -- 39,999 19,856 -9,000 174,000 889,000 3,909,000 13,683 159,141 896,555 3,867,502 400,000 350,000 101,690 585,386 16. Rochester, MN New Work: Approp. Cost -3,115,451 -877,000 4,455,595 680,130 40,000 20,000 68,247,549 40,266 34,034 68,229,3128 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 17. Sanders Creek, Boscobel, MN New Work: Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 18. Sheyenne River, ND New Work: Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Horace to W. Fargo Contrib. Cost 1,578,141 36,103 -2,179 -581 14,656 8,500 1,810 2,357 5,877 0 48,610 21,500 24,189 6,669,202 6,641,174 -- 1,441,500 4,035 1,441,5009 -- 175,357 95 175,357 546,000 860,000 493,000 720,000 623,164 932,440 483,941 666,630 23,372,000 23,306,79010 430,000 5,000 424,318 16-15 2,674,000 2,607,6407 685,000 543,000 219,600 219,566 59,855 59,855 6,891,000 6,839,140 750,000 684,076 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 16-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Cost Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 1998 (Contributed Funds) New Work: W. Fargo Contrib. -- -- -- 10,000 1,060,000 Cost 14 -- -- 15,000 1,017,872 19. Souris River New Work: Basin, ND Approp. 846,000 -2,245,000 1,953,000 650,000 102,145,000 Cost 5,653,524 4,940,269 1,692,829 772,630 101,980,460" Maint. Approp. 113,000 112,000 337,000 280,000 1,075,000 Cost 113,375 110,884 329,379 251,636 1,036,940 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. -- -- -- -- 5,698,858 Cost -- -- -- -- 5,679,113 20. St. Croix River New Work: Stillwater, MN Approp. -- -- 473,000 779,000 3,652,000 Cost 489,875 1,157,838 853,188 54,673 2,840,726 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. -- 200,000 500,000 -- 700,000 Cost -- -- 358,025 177,646 535,671 21. St. Paul, MN New Work: Arpprop. 400,000 -- 210,000 10,000 13,254,000 Cost 1,161,832 92,868 208,096 8,368 13,249,52212 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. -- 125,000 -- -- 4,024,000 Cost 1,190,980 139,479 -- -- 4,023,829 1. Includes $681,805 for new work for previous project. 2. Includes $100,857 for maintenance for previous projects. 3. Excludes $1,004,498 in other contributed funds that have been expended for betterments. 4. $744,114 in other contributed funds have been expended for betterments. 5. Excludes $56,220 contributed funds. Includes $23,000 expended during FY91-FY95 under Section 1135, Public Law 99-662 authority. 6. Excludes $249,964 for relocations accomplished under a government contract but which are a non-Federal responsibility. 7. Excludes $1,802,866 for previous project. Includes $372,000 CP&E funds obligated prior to 1 Oct 85 which remains excluded from the project cost estimate. 8. Includes cost of the Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit $11,239, which is classed as "deferred" and the units on which authorization has expired: Maple River, $1,241; Moorhead, $27,700; Sheyenne, $37,956. In addition, $203,874 special desposit funds and $146,160 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under government contract paid for by local interests. Includes $184,352 expended on Orwell Lake between FY91 - FY96 under Section 1135, Public Law 99-662 authority. 9. $787,042 in other contributed funds have been expended for betterments and $4,198,445 for relocations accomplished under a government contract but which are a non-Federal responsibility. 10. $52,643 in other contributed funds have been expended for betterments. 11. Excludes $1,150,000 sunk costs for deauthorized Kindred Lake unit (see Table 16-G). Excludes $475,000 for costs associated with inactive Maple River unit. 12. Excludes $4,919,000 sunk costs for deferred Lake Darling Dam unit (see Table 16-E). 16-16 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 16-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Sec. Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. March 3, 1899 March 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 27, 1916 June 26, 19342 October 22, 1976 RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN Reconstruct 4 of the 5 original dams and surveys to determine extent of lands overflowed by reservoirs. Reconstruct Sandy Lake Dam and construct Gull Lake Reservoir. Construct an equalizing canal between Winnibigoshish and Leech Lake Reservoirs (no work was done and this part of the project abandoned in Act of Mar. 4, 1915). Abandonment of ditches connecting Long Lake, Round Lake, and Gull Lake. Operation and maintenance provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. H. Doc. 363, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 413, 64th Cong., 1 sess.' BASSETT CREEK, MN 1976 WRDA Public Law 94-587 FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act -- Public Law 99-98 July 24, 1946 May 18, 1995 6. October 22, 1976 November 17, 1986 7. July 24, 1946 August 23, 1996 8. December 22, 1944 November 17, 1986 9. November 17, 1986 BIG FORK RIVER, MN CHASKA, MN Cost Sharing provisions HENNEPIN COUNTY, CSAH 116, MN HOMME LAKE AND DAM, ND Authorized as Park River Reservoir Redesignated Homme Reservoir and Dam Project restoration of wetland habitat conditions HOUSTON, MN June 30, 1948 November 17, 1988 Sec 14 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act -- Public Law 99-98 1976 WRDA-- Public Law 94-587 1986 WRDA-- Public Law 99-662 Sec 14 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended 1944 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 194, 78th Cong., 2d sess.) Public Law 435 (80th Cong. 2d sess.) Sec 401 1986 WRDA-- Public Law 99-662 Sec 401 1986 WRDA-- Public Law 99-662, as amended Sec 205 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended Sec 4 WRDA 1988, as amended 16-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 16-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date of Sec. Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 10. October 23, 1962 October 12, 1996 11. December 22, 1944 12. July 24, 1946 April 26, 1995 13. November 17, 1986 LA FARGE LAKE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, WI Flood control dam and impoundment project Modification to original project to include transfer of approximately 8,569 acres of project lands to the State of Wisconsin and the Secretary of the Interior to be held in trust for the Ho-Chunk Nation. Modification also includes deauthorizing the construction of the reservoir and dam, while completing other features of the original project. LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALDHILL DAM MANKATO TOWNSHIP, MN MARSHALL, MN November 17, 1988 14. July 24, 1946 August 23, 1996 15. November 17, 1986 16. November 17, 1986 MELROSE, WI PORTAGE, WI ROCHESTER, MN October 31, 1992 17. June 30, 1948 October, 1991 18. November 17, 1986 19. November 17, 1986 SANDERS CREEK, BOSCOBEL, WI SHEYENNE RIVER, ND Project shall include a dam and reservoir of approximately 35,000 acre-feet of storage for the purpose of flood protection Maple River. SOURIS RIVER BASIN, ND Consists of two reservoirs in Saskatchewan, Canada (known as Rafferty and Alameda projects); a flood warning system for Minot; Levee and channel improvements at Sawyer and six subdivisions from Burlington to Minot; levee and diversion channel at Renville County Park; flood proofing in the basin and Purchase of flowage easements; modifications to dams 87 and 96 in the Upper Souris National Wildlife Refuge; and modificantions to Dams 320, 326, 332, 341 and 357 in the J. Clark Salyer National Wildlife Refuge. 1962 Flood Control Act WRDA 1996 Flood Control Act 1944 Sec 14 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended WRDA 1986- Public Law 99-662, Sec 401 (a) WRDA 1988- Public Law 100-676 Sec 14 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended WRDA 1986- Public Law 99-662 WRDA 1986- Public Law 99-662 WRDA 1992- Sec 102, Public Law 102-580 Sec 205 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended WRDA 1986- Public Law 99-662 WRDA 1986-Public Law 99-662 16-18 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 16-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date of Sec. Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 20. October 12, 1996 ST. CROIX RIVER, STILLWATER, MN WRDA 1996 (Public Law 104-303) Sec 363, WRDA 1992 21. November 17, 1986 ST. PAUL, MN WRDA 1986- Public Law 99-662 WRDA 1990- Public Law 101-640 1. Contains latest published map. 2. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 16-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 16-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 30, 1998 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Baudette Harbor, MN Completed 1961 $36,415 $57,768 Black River, WI ' 1950 67,585 -- Lake Traverse, MN and SD 3,4 1921 92 -- Minnesota River, MN Completed 1996 2,057,7228 96,948 Mississippi and Leech Rivers, MN Completed3 1929 277,615 40,251 Mississippi River between Brainerd s 1925 47,794 3,891 and Grand Rapids, MN Pine Creek, Angle Inlet, MN Completed 1978 38,700 102,196 Red Lake and Red Lake River, MN Completed3 1923 9,070 -- Red River of the North, MN and ND 3,6 1921 293,344 76,209 St. Croix River, MN and WI Completed 1991 150,410 1,185,011 Warroad Harbor and River, MN Completed 1996 86,105 2,118,891 Wisconsin River, WI 2.3 1888 -- -- Zippel Bay Harbor, MN Inactive 1928 27,941 11,139 Zippel Bay, Lake of the Woods County, MN Completed 1996 515,000 63,941 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Existing channel adequate for commerce (see Table 16-G for deauthorized portion of project.) Originally included in project 'Fox and Wisconsin River, WI'. Abandonment of improvement of Wisconsin River by channel contraction works recommended in 1886 and 1887 (H. Doc. 65, 49th Cong., 2nd sess.) Expenditures included under 'Fox and Wisconsin Rivers, WI'. No breakdown available. No commerce reported. Abandonment recommended in 1915 (H. Doc. 439, 64th Cong., 1st sess.) and June 24, 1926 (H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.) Abandonment recommended June 24, 1926 (H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.) Abandonment recommended in 1915 (H. Doc. 1666, 63d Cong., 3d sess.) Abandonment recommended June 24, 1926 (H. Doc., 69th Cong., 1st sess.) Includes $117,542 for new work for previous project. 16-20 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 16-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 30, 1998 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, Completed 1996 $12,174,600' $4,687,948 MN and SD Black Bear & Miller Lakes, Completed 1988 471,000 -- Crow Wing City, MN3 Black River at North Bend, WI2 Completed -- 74,500 -- Bonnes Coulee, Velva, ND2 Completed 1985 58,500 -- Cannon River at Faribault, MN2 Completed 1991 62,5856 -- Cochrane Drainage Ditch, WI Completed -- 37,182 -- Devils Lake, ND3 Completed 1992 2,732,000 -- Dry Run, IA Completed 1966 1,790,7597 -- Eau Galle River, WI Completed 1996 9,039,250 11,672,288 Elk River, MN Completed 1970 259,7008 -- Emerson Manitoba-Noyes, MN3 Completed 1992 343,0009 -- Enderlin, Maple River, ND3 Completed 1990 4,000,00010 -- Gilmore Creek, Winona, MN3 Completed 1997 2,351,553" -- Grafton Pumping Station, ND2 Completed 1990 92,86512 -- Grand Mound, State Historic Site, MN2 Completed 1992 242,000'13-- Guttenberg, IA Completed 1974 2,361,915 -- Hanover, Hennepin County, MN2 Completed 1988 259,500 -- Irving Township, Jackson County, WI2 Completed 1984 189,600 -- Irving Township at Nicols Road, Completed 1986 158,500 -- Jackson County, WI2 Kickapoo River, Gays Mills, WI2 Completed 1987 33,000 -- Lac qui Parle Lakes, MN Completed 1996 964,873 11,497,462 Lake Andrusia, Mississippi River, MN2 Completed 1989 61,32614 -- Lake Darling Dam, ND Deferred 1987 4,919,000's -- Lake Pulaski, Wright County, MN3 Completed 1991 1,353,47816 -- Lake Traverse and Bois de Completed 1996 1,339,727 8,652,558 Sioux River, SD and MN Lost River, MN Completed 1967 517,519" -- Lower Branch Rush River, ND3 Completed 1974 1,000,00018 -- Mahnomen, Wild Rice River, MN2 Completed -- 85,400 -- Mankato and North Mankato, MN Completed 1997 96,982,76319 -- Middle River at Argyle, MN3 Completed 1993 2,360,000 -- Minnesota River, Belgrade Township, MN2 Completed 1995 261,00020 -- Minnesota River at Henderson, MN3 Completed 1997 1,969,8002' Minnesota River at LeSueur,MN2 Completed 1986 250,00022 -- Minneota, MN3 Completed 1963 161,545 -- Minot, ND Completed 1983 21,479,50023 -- Mississippi River near Aitkin, MN Completed 1957 1,675,835 -- Pembina River, ND Active5 1983 -- -- Pettibone Park, La Crosse, WI2 Completed 1989 62,762" -- Plum Creek, New Haven Township, MN4 Completed -- 31,100 -- Prairie du Chien, WI Completed 1991 3,529,000 -- Red Lake River at Gentilly, MN Completed 1991 311,00025 -- Red Lake River at Huot, MN2 Completed 1984 64,500 -- Red Lake River at Red Lake Falls, MN2 Completed 1984 131,000 -- 16-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 16-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD (Continued) CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 30, 1998 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Red Lake River, MN including Clearwater River, MN Red Lake River, Polk County, Crookston, MN2 Red Lake River, State Hwy 32, MN2 Red River of the North at Argusville, ND3 Red River of the North at Breckenridge, MN2 Red River of the North at Breckenridge, MN2 Red River of the North Drainage Basin, MN SD, & ND Red River of the North at Fargo, ND-Moorhead, MN4 Red River of the North at Halstad, MN3 Red River of the North at Oslo, MN3 Red River of the North at Pembina, ND3 Redwood River below Marshall, MN 3 Root River at Hokah, MN2 Roseau River, MN Rushford, MN Shepard Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN2 Sheyenne River, Valley City, ND2 Snake River, Alarado, MN3 Sogn, MN Souris River, Velva, ND 2 State Road and Ebner Coulees, WI Sterling Center, MN2 St. Hilaire, MN St. Paul and South St. Paul, MN Twin Valley Lake, MN Upper Iowa River, IA Velva, ND3 Vermillion River, Hastings, MN3 Veteran's Memorial Levee, Mississippi River, Hastings, MN 2 Wabasha County, County Hwy 11, MN2 Wabasha, Mississippi River, MN 2 Warner Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN2 Warner Road, Sibley Street, Mississippi River, St. Paul MN Wild Rice River, Hendrum/Lee, MN3 Wild Rice River, Mahnomen County, MN 2 Wild Rice River, Mahnomen, MN4 Wild Rice River, South Branch and Felton Ditch, MN Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1996 1997 1993 1990 1990 1997 1992 1986 1984 1979 1960 1992 1996 1980 1985 1988 1997 1996 1988 1996 1997 1996 1974 1988 1964 1970 1980 1985 1995 1993 1987 1992 1997 1986 1989 1989 3,120,07926 166,40027 151,665" 1,534,000 85,66525 27,500 8,322,11230 226,50031 2,012,000 1,960,200 2,000,000 202,400 239,62732 2,341,00033 3,192,333 25,-00034 111,000 1,761,00035 47,40036 137,500 21,617,0003" 160,90038 141,10039 8,476,01240 2,115,700 888,445 334,628 999,900 182,000 273,00041 113,70042 250,000 500,00043 383,30044 58,500 86,568 5,620,700 16-22 2,929,823 11,545,052 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 16-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD (Continued) CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 30, 1998 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance Winona, MN Completed 1989 32,741,13145 -- Zumbro River at Genoa, MN2 Completed 1992 34,50046 -- Zumbro River, MN Completed 1975 1,284,100 -- Zumbro River at Jarrett and Millville, MN 2 Completed 1990 141,44047 -- 1. Excludes $152,492 contributed funds. In addition, $487,491 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under Government contract paid for by the Ottertail Power Company. 2. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Section 14, Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. 3. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 4. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Section 208, Flood Control Act of 1954, as amended. 5. Preconstruction planning has not started. Phase I completed under General Investigations. 6. Excludes $18,362 contributed funds. 7. Excludes $42,766 contributed funds. 8. In addition $87,878 was expended from Public Law 99 funds in the spring of 1969 for emergency protection and incorporation into the permanent project. 9. Excludes $201,544 contributed funds. 10. Excludes $150,191 contributed funds. 11. Excludes $12,749 contributed funds. 12. Excludes $27,583 contributed funds. 13. Excludes $77,290 contributed funds. 14. Excludes $20,441 contributed funds. 15. Advance engineering and design costs only. Project deferred with authorization of Souris River Basin Project (see Section 25 and Table 16-A for costs for active project. 16. Excludes $74,225 contributed funds. 17. Excludes $46,034 for the Ruffy Brook unit for which authorization expired in April 1966 (see Table 16-G). Excludes $246,911 contributed funds. 18. Excludes $35,000 contributed funds. 19. Excludes $79,749 contributed funds. 20. Excludes $68,421 contributed funds. 21. Excludes $307,239 contributed funds. 22. Excludes $130,300 contributed funds. 23. Excludes $4,167 contributed funds. 24. Excludes $20,920 contributed funds. 25. Excludes $92,402 contributed funds. 26. Excludes $30,020 contributed funds. 27. Excludes $33,000 contributed funds. 28. Excludes $35,430 contributed funds. 29. Excludes $26,055 contributed funds. 30. Includes cost of the Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit $11,239, which is classed as "deferred" and the units on which authorization has expired: Maple River, $1,241; Moorehead, $27,700; which Sheyenne, $37,956. In addition, $203,874 special deposit funds and $146,160 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under government contract paid for by local interests. Includes $184,352 expended on Orewll Lake between FY91 - FY96 under Section 1135, Public Law 99-662 authority. Excludes $64,775 contributed funds under Section 1135, PL 99-662 authority. 31. Excludes $61,895 contributed funds. 16-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 16-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD (Continued) CONTROL PROJECTS 32. Excludes $67,014 contributed funds. 33. Excludes $65,902 contributed funds. 34. Excludes $62,620 contributed funds. 35. Excludes $100,000 contributed funds. 36. Excludes $5,253 contributed funds. 37. Excludes $225,000 sunk costs for inactive Ebner Coulee unit (see Table 16-E) and $4,175,632 contributed funds. 38. Excludes $39,815 contributed funds. 39. Excludes $31,064 contributed funds. 40. Excludes $545,637 contributed funds for new work and $38,000 expended by South St. Paul for work in lieu of required cash contribution. Excludes an additional $206,629 expended for work done at request of local interests. 41. Excludes $73,619 contributed funds. 42. Excludes $37,631 contributed funds. 43. Excludes $184,709 contributed funds. 44. Excludes $97,800 contributed funds. 45. Excludes $589,316 contributed funds. In addition, $717,809 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under Government contract paid for by local interests. 46. Excludes $11,066 contributed funds. 47. Excludes $38,173 contributed funds. 16-24 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 16-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended Black River, WI' 1950 Aug. 5, 1977 -- -- Black River Lake, WI 1950 Aug. 5, 1977 -- -- Burlington Dam, Souris River, ND 1983 Mar. 10, 1995 $5,568,6002 -- Grafton, ND 1983 Nov. 18, 1991 -- -- Hudson Harbor, WI3 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 -- -- Kindred Lake, ND4 1987 Nov. 17, 1986 1,150,000 -- La Crosse, WI5 1983 Nov. 17, 1986 -- -- Lake Darling Dam, ND 1987 Sep. 13, 1994 4,919,0006 -- Maple River, ND 7 1981 Oct. 6, 1961 1,241 -- Moorhead, MN7 1981 Oct. 30, 1961 27,700 -- Pembina River Lake, ND 1950 Jan. 1, 1990 50,000 -- Ruffy Brook, MN 1967 Apr. 1966 46,034 -- Sheyenne River, ND7 1981 Dec. 31, 1970 37,956 -- State Road and Ebner Coulees 1981 Jul. 9, 1995 225,000 -- (Ebner Coulee Unit) Tongue River Lake, ND 1950 Jan. 1, 1990 23,695 -- Warroad River and Bulldog Creek, MN 1974 Nov. 17, 1986 182,000 -- Warroad Harbor and River, MN8 1981 Aug. 5, 1977 -- -- 1. Portion of project for removal of obstructions at various points outside the dredged area to clear channel to full project width (see Table 16-C for costs for completed portion of the project). 2. Advance engineering and design costs only. The Senate Report 97-256 states that the Corps is to take no further action to construct Burlington Dam until directed to do so by Congress. 3. Part of the St. Croix River, Minnesota and Wisconsin project. 4. Previously part of Sheyenne River, ND project (see Section 23 and Table 16-A for costs for active project). 5. Authorized for further study by a House Committee on Public Works Resolution dated March 15, 1988. 6. Advance engineering and design costs only. (See Section 25 and Table 16-A for costs for active project). 7. Part of Red River of the North Drainage Basin (see Section 20 in text and Table 16-I for costs for active units of .project). 8. Portion of dredging of entrance channel and turning basin to complete project width and depth (see Table 16-C for costs for completed portion of project). 16-25 TABLE 16-H RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER (See Section 2 of Text) Outlet Watershed Area (Square miles) Capacity Previous Projects Existing Projects at Minimum Above Watershed Maximum Stages St. Paul (Square Original Stage Total Reservoir (feet)' River (miles) miles) Lake Reservoir (acre-feet) Completed Cost Completed Cost Cost Winnibigoshish 6 Mississippi 408 1442 117 179.4 967,930 1884 $214,000 1900 $173,470 $387,470 Leech Lake 0 Leech 410 1163 173 205.9 743,320 1884 171,805 1902 84,830 256,185 Pokegama 6 Mississippi 344 6602 24 35.0 120,750 1884 85,000 1904 126,030 211,030 Sandy Lake 7 Sandy 267 421 8 16.6 72,500 1895 114,000 1909 117,020 231,020 Pine River 9 Pine 199 562 18 23.7 177,520 1886 97,000 1907 133,320 230,320 Gulf Lake 5 Gull 168 287 20 20.5 70,820 -- -- 1913 86,826 86,826 Surveys and flowage rights -- -- -- -- 160,939 160,939 Recreational facilities -- -- -- -- 2,834,838 2,834,838 Total new work -- -- 681,805 -- 3,716,823 4,398,628 Total operating and care -- -- 100,857 -- 54,407,266 54,508,123 Permanent indefinite -- -- -- -- 967,197 967,197 appropriation for operation and care, Feb. 1, 1895 to end of fiscal year 1936 Rehabilitation -- -- -- -- 425,000 425,000 Total 2,152,840 -- $782,662 -- $57,810,481 $60,298,948 1. Lower operating limits by regulations approved February 4, 1936, as modified December 29, 1944. 2. Exclusive of area controlled by Winnibigoshish and Leech Lake Dams. 0 0 'ol z 0 0 t-a t o ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 16-I RED RIVER OF THE NORTH DRAINAGE BASIN: ACTIVE UNITS IN COMPREHENSIVE BASIN PLAN (See Section 20 of Text) Cost to Total Sep. 30, Estimated State Type 1998 Federal Cost Orwell River (Otter Tail River) Minnesota Reservoir $1,916,753 $1,916,700' Wild Rice and Marsh Rivers Minnesota Channel improvement 405,056 405,100 Rush River North Dakota Channel improvement 287,686 287,700 Sand Hill River Minnesota Channel improvement 548,778 548,800 Mustinka River Minnesota Channel improvement 440,788 440,800 Otter Tail River Minnesota Channel improvement 174,768 174,800 Red River at Grand Forks North Dakota Levees and flooodwall 948,895 948,900 Red River at East Grand Forks Minnesota Levees, floodwall, 1,698,2002 17,500,0003 pumping plants Red River at Fargo North Dakota Channel improvement 1,639,924 1,639,9004 Total Cost to Date $8,060,8485 Total Estimate Cost $23,862,7006 1. Includes $181,713 for lands and $25,045 for recreation facilities. 2. Excludes cost for current planning, engineering and design work. See Table 16-M for current year costs associated with this work. 3. The East Grand Forks unit was reclassified from active to inactive on August 19, 1988; the project was reactivated in June 1997. The cost of this unit was last revised in 1987. A new flood control plan and cost estimate for a combined Grand Forks-East Grand Forks project are being developed. 4. Includes $67,900 for lands. 5. Costs of $11,239 for the Wahpeton-Breckenridge deferred unit not included. Authorization of the Sheyenne River, Moorhead, and Maple River units has expired. Cost of these units also not included total $66,897. 6. The Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit of the project is classed as 'deferred' and is excluded from the estimate. The cost of this unit, last revised in 1955, was estimated to be $666,000. The Flood Control Act approved December 31, 1970 (H. Doc. 330-91-2) provided for deletion of the Sheyenne River unit, and authorization of the Maple River and Moorhead units expired at the end of the 5-year period within which local interests were required to furnish assurances of local cooperation. Authorization of these units, not included, expired on the dates indicated in Table 16-G. In FY 89, the Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit was included as part of the General Investigation program under Restudy of Deferred projects. 16-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 16-J INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 22 of Text) Project Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, MN and Black Bear & Miller Lake, Crow Wing Co... Black River - Irving Township - Jackson Count Black River at North Bend, WI ........... Bonnes Coulee at Velva, ND ............ Cannon River at Faribault, MN ........... Cochrane Drainage Ditch, WI ............ Devils Lake, ND ..................... Dry Run, Decorah, IA ................. Eau Galle River, Spring Valley, WI ........ Elk River, MN ...................... Emerson, Manitoba- Noyes, MN ......... Enderlin, Maple River, ND.............. Grafton, ND ........................ Grand Mound State Historic Site, MN ...... Guttenberg, IA ...................... Hanover, Hennepin County, MN .......... Hennepin County, CSAH 116, MN ........ Irving Township at Nicols Road, Jackson Count Kickapoo River, Gays Mills, WI .......... Lake Andrusia, Mississippi River, MN ...... Mahnomen, Wild Rice River, MN ......... Mankato - North Mankato, MN ........... Melrose, WI ........................ Middle River at Argyle, MN............. M inneota, MN ....................... Minnesota River at Henderson, MN ........ Minnesota River at LeSueur, MN ......... Minnesota River at North Mankato, MN ..... Minnesota River, Belgrade Township, MN ... Minot, ND ...................... Mississippi River near Aitkin, MN ........ Pettibone Park, LaCrosse, WI ............ Plume Creek, New Haven Township, MN ... Prairie du Chein, WI .................. SD ....... .... .. .............................. June 1998 ............................................... July 1998 y, WI ........................................ August 1998 ............................................. August 1998 .... ......................... ..... ........... M ay 1998 ............... ................... ............. M ay 1998 ...... ................... ..... ........... A ugust 1998 ... ................... ............ ............ M ay 1998 ............................... .............. O ctober 1998 ................... ......... ......... ...... August 1998 ............................ .... ..... ...... July 1998 .................................. ............. July 1998 ............................... ............ . July 1998 ................................. ............ . July 1998 . ................... .................. . September 1998 ............................. ........... . August 1998 .............................. ................. July 1998 ........................... ...... ........... . July 1998 y, W I ........................................ August 1998 ..... .................. .................... . August 1998 ........... ............ ............... . September 1998 ............................................... July 1998 ........................ ................. . August 1998 .......................... ................. August 1998 .................... ............ ... .... ...... July 1998 .................................... ........... July 1998 .................... ................... ........ July 1998 Red Lake River at Gentilly, MN .................. Red Lake River at Huot, MN .................... Red Lake River at Red Lake, Falls, MN ............. Red Lake River, Polk County, Crookston, MN ........ Red Lake River, State Highway 32, MN ............ Red River of the North at Argusville, ND ........... Red River of the North at Breckenridge, MN ......... Red River of the North at Fargo, ND-Moorhead, MN ... Red River of the North at Halstad, ND .............. Red River of the North at Oslo, MN ............... Red River of the North at Pembina, ND ............. Redwood River below Marshall, MN .............. Root River at Hokah, MN ....................... Roseau River, MN ........................... Rushford, MN .............................. Shepard Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN ........ Sheyenne River, Valley City, ND ................. .......... May 1998 .. . August 1998 . August 1998 .......... May 1998 . July 1998 .......... May 1998 .......... May 1998 . August 1998 . July 1998 .......... July 1998 . July 1998 . July 1998 . July 1998 . July 1998 . July 1998 . July 1998 . July 1998 ...... July 1998 ....... July 1998 ....... July 1998 ....... July 1998 ... September 1998 ....... May 1998 ... December 1997 ....... July 1998 16-28 Date Inspected . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,. . ,. .. .. .......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 16-J INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) (See Section 22 of Text) Project Date Inspected Snake River at Alvarado, MN ........................................................... July 1998 Souris River Basin, ND .......... ......................... .......................... May 1998 Souris River - Burlington to Minot ....................................................... May 1998 Souris River - Renville, County Park ...................................................... May 1998 Souris River - Rural Improvements ....................................................... May 1998 Souris River - Sawyer ................................................................ May 1998 Souris River, Velva, ND ............................................................... May 1998 South Bend Township - Lehillier, MN ...................................... ............. August 1998 St. Hillaire, M N .............................................. ........... ............ July 1998 State Road & Ebner Coulee, WI ....................................................... August 1998 Sterling Center, Maple River, MN ...................................................... August 1998 Trempealeau River - Arcadia ......................................................... August 1998 Upper Iowa River, IA .............................................................. August 1998 Vermillion River, Hastings, MN ......................................................... May 1998 Veterans Memorial Levee, Mississippi River, MN ............................................. May 1998 Warner Road at Sibley Street, St. Paul, MN ............................................. November 1997 Warner Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN ........................................... December 1997 Wild Rice River, Mahnomen County, MN .................................................. July 1998 Zumbro River, MN .................................................................. May 1998 Zumbro River at Geno, MN ............................................................ May 1998 Zumbro River at Jarrett and Millville, MN .................................................. May 1998 Zumbro River at Wabasha County - Hammond ............................................... May 1998 16-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 16-K FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Chippewa River at Montevideo, MN .................................................... $60,767 City of Houston ................................................................. 14,632 Cottonwood River, Springfield, MN ............. ........................................ 29,298 Granite Falls, MN ............................................. .............. 62,316 Lac Qui Parle River, Dawson, MN .................................................. 54,360 Minnewaukan, ND ............................................................... 33,449 Morais River, ND ........... .................................................... .. 112 Ottertail River, Breckenridge, MN ..................................................... 56,995 Pembina River, Neche, ND .......................................................... 54,278 Red River of the North ............................................................ 17,854 Section 205 Coordination .......................................................... 119,451 Wahpeton, ND .................................................................. 24,584 Wild Rice, and Marsh Rivers, Ada, MN .................................................... 3,056 Wild Rice, Marsh Rivers, MN ........................................................ 7,994 Zumbro River, Pine Island, MN ...................................................... 18,029 Emergency bank protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Aitkin County State Aid, Hwy 10, MN ................................................. $10,040 Fargo Public Facilities, ND .................. ................... ................. 62,268 Granite Falls, MN ..................................... ...................... 3,124 Lake* Minnewaska, CSAH 17, Glenwood, MN ............................................... 176 Lake St. Croix Beach Public Facilities, MN .............................................. 39,387 LeSueur River CSAH 28, Blue Earth County, MN ......................................... 45,395 Minnesota Highway 169, Mankato, MN .................................................. 57,044 Paxton Township Road, Lower Sioux Indian, MN ............................................. -317 Section 14 Coordination ........................................................... 10,510 16-30 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 16-L PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT Modifications of projects for the purpose of improving the quality of the environment in the public interest (Section 1135, Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress, as amended) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Coordination account funds ............................. ............................ $ 4,414 Initial appraisals, general ........................................................... 6,284 Lac Qui Parle Clay Banks, MN ...................................................... 28,423 TABLE 16-M AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION Restorations of Aquatic Ecosystems pursuant to Section 206, Public Law 104-303 Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Coordination account funds ........................................................ $ 2,930 Preliminary restoration plans ......................................... ............... 11,387 TABLE 16-N GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Sections 27, 28, and 29 of Text) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs SURVEYS Flood Damage Prevention Studies Grand Forks, ND ...................................... ........... .... $ -147' Special Studies Devils Lake, ND ................................................ ...... . 385,3412 Midtown Dam, ND ........................................................ 150 Miscellaneous Activities Special Investigations .......................................... . ............ 74,050 FERC Licensing Activities ........................................... ......... 3,846 Inter Agency Water Resources Development ....................................... 64,382 North American Waterfowl Management Plan ....................................... 2,272 Coordination with Other Agencies Cooperation with Other Water Resource Agencies ...................................... 886 Planning Assistance to States3 : Minnesota ........................................................... 24,265 North Dakota .................. . . . ............. ............. 25 Wisconsin ............................................... ............. 49,567 16-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 16-N GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (Continued) (See Sections 35, 36, and 37 of Text) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs TOTAL SURVEYS .............................................................. $ 604,638 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA International W ater Studies .......... ............................................ $181,9734 Flood Plain Management Services Unit ................................................ 45,317 Technical Services, General ...................................................... 48,845 Quick Responses .............................................................. 3,082 Special Studies ............................................................. 107,435 Hydrologic Studies Stream Flow Data .................................... ......................... 12,686 TOTAL COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA .................................... $399,338 ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Crookston, M N ............................................. East Grand Forks, M N ........................................ TOTAL ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN .................... .................... $258,902 ................... 3,926,288 .................. $4,185,190 Excludes $256 contributed funds. Excludes $410,370 contributed funds. Excludes $119,172 contributed funds. Excludes $68,140 for International Water Studies under O & M Appropriation. 16-32 1. 2. 3. 4. 4 i MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN Section of river covered in this report is divided into three reaches, under supervision and direction of District Engineers at St. Louis, Rock Island, and St. Paul. Section in St. Louis District extends 105 miles from Mouth of Missouri River to Upper Location. Mississippi River rises in northern Minnesota, flows about 2,360 miles southerly and empties into Gulf of Mexico. Portion included in this report extends about 663 miles from mouth of Missouri River to Soo Line Railroad bridge, Minneapolis. The latest map and profile showing this section of river are in House Document 669, 76th Congress, 3d session. A map showing Lake Pepin is in House Document 511, 79th Congress, 2d session. A map of section Minneapolis to Dubuque is in House Document 515, 79th Congress, 2d session. A map showing location of drainage districts (Bellevue, Iowa, to Missouri River) is in River and Harbors Committee Document 34, 75th Congress, 1st session. Previous projects. See page 1199 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. Provides a channel of 9-foot depth and adequate width between mouth of Missouri River (1,179 miles from the gulf) and Soo Line Railroad at Minneapolis, by construction of a system of locks and dams, supplemented by dredging. Project also provides for further improvements at St. Paul to provide a 2.7 mile basin extending downstream from Robert Street Bridge, and at Minneapolis to provide adequate terminal facilities, and for other harbor improvements and miscellaneous work. Pertinent data on locks and dams, harbor improvements, additional features entering into cost of project, and authorizing legislation are given in Tables 17-C, 17-D, 17-E, and 17-G. All dams are concrete. Three dams (Upper St. Anthony Falls, 1 and 19) are fixed, remainder are movable. See House Document 669, 76th Congress, 3d session, for a report of Chief of Engineers dated February 27, 1940, containing a general plan for improvement of Mississippi River between Coon Rapids Dam and mouth of Ohio River Mississippi River mile 300 above Ohio River; Rock Island District extends about 314 miles from mile 300 to 614; and St. Paul District extends about 244 miles from mile 614 to Soo Line Railroad bridge, Minneapolis (mile 857.6). for purposes of navigation, power development, flood control, and irrigation needs. Location cooperation. Small-boat harbors authorized in the River and Harbor Act of 1962 are subject to conditions that local interests make a cash contribution toward cost of construction (except in case of Quincy Harbor which involves maintenance only of an existing harbor); furnish lands and rightsof- way for construction and future maintenance; hold the United States free from damages; provide and maintain mooring facilities and utilities; reserve accommodations for transient small boats; accomplish all necessary relocations and alterations; and establish public bodies empowered to regulate use, growth and development of the harbors. Rectification of seepage damages to privately owned lands in the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL, was contingent upon the conditions that local interests acquire all lands, easements, and rightsof- way necessary for construction and maintenance of the project; comply with applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970; accept, operate, and maintain the project upon its completion; and hold and save the United States free from damages arising from the construction and operation of the completed project; provided further that the local public entity shall be reimbursed by the Government in the amounts actually expended by it in the acquisition of real estate and for payments required under Public Law 91-646 if said amounts have been previously submitted to and approved by the Government. Local cooperation requirements have been complied with for improvement of commercial harbor at Dubuque, IA; for improvement of Beaver Slough at 17-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Clinton, IA, for navigation; and for general navigation facilities at small-boat harbors at Rock Island, IL; Hannibal, MO; Fort Madison, IA; Davenport (Lindsay Park), IA; Muscatine, IA (including freight terminal approach channel); Andalusia, IL; Warsaw, IL; Moline, IL; Clinton, IA; and Savanna, IL. Licenses. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission collects from non-Federal licensees annually to recompensate the United States for use of government dams for generation of hydroelectric power. Amounts collected are returned to U.S. Treasury. (See Table 17-F for license fees collected through the end of the fiscal year.) St. Paul District. New Work: None. Maintenance: During the 1998 navigation season, the Government pipeline dredge WILLIAM A. THOMPSON removed 489,133 cubic yards of material at nine sites. Government derrick barge HAUSER/WADE removed 12,156 cubic yards of material at two sites. Government pipeline dredge DUBUQUE removed 62,533 cubic yards of material at two sites. Mechanical dredging contractors removed 570,872 cubic yards of material at 30 sites and contracted hydraulic dredging removed 197,427 cubic yards for four sites. Major maintenance projects included completion of structural rehabilitation at Dam 5, lock dewatering at L/D 5A, structural rehabilitation at Dam 7, the central control building at Lock 5, and the dredge material placement site excavation in the Lower pool. Projects started in FY 98 included central control building at Lock 6, the dredge material placement site excavation at Grand Encampment, and closure of the auxiliary lock at Lock 2. The crane carrier supply contract remained ongoing. Operating and Care: Locks and Dams were operated as required and necessary repairs were made to those and appurtenant structures. Other studies, reports, and miscellaneous engineering work were also accomplished. Total Maintenance and operating and care costs were $41,425,970. Rehabilitation: Major rehabilitation projects at Locks and Dam 3 and 5A through 9 included the completion of the electrical rehabilitation at Dam 9 and the initiation of this work at Dam 7. A supply contract for tainter gate chain for Lock and Dam 5a was started as well as installation at Dams 5A and 8. Building and control (Stage 2) construction was started at Lock and Dam 6. Lock and Dam 5A building and control engineering work was started for Lock and Dam 7. The supply of crane carriers and bulkhead hoists is ongoing. The major rehabilitation project at Lock and Dam 3 was reevaluated because of increased cost for the recommended plan. A new plan has been formulated and surveys have been taken. Construction on the first stage at Dike A was started. The remaining construction is scheduled to start during the fourth quarter of FY 99 and be completed by September 2001. Costs to St. Paul were $41,425,970 for operation and maintenance and $4,096,946 for rehabilitation; for a total cost of $45,522,916. Rock Island District. New Work: None. Maintenance: Channel dredging by Government cutterhead pipeline dredge WILLIAM A. THOMPSON was performed at various locations in Pools 11, 18, 21, and 24 at a cost of $3,879,800 with 245,787 cubic yards of material being removed. Rock Island District assistance to Dredge Thompson cost $172,200. Dredging inspection and reports were completed at a cost of $139,700. Dredge material disposal activities and other environmental concerns inconnection with dredging cost $141,900. Snagging, clearing and excavation was performed by hired labor at various locations at a cost of $41,200. Repair of channel regulating works structures was performed at a cost of $1,601,600. Structural repairs were performed at a cost of $5,578,300. Sandblast, paint and repairs to Lock and Dam 14 continued at a cost of $1,418,500. Lock and Dam 17 chain replacement was initiated at a cost of $1,756,100. Mississippi miter gate motor replacement cost $299,400. Repair upper guidewall at Lock and Dam 15 continued at a cost of $3,400. Rehab of Lock and Dam 16 control station was initiated at a cost of $5,000. LeClaire Base redevelopment, utility corridor stage 1, continued at a cost of $229,000. Lock and Dam 22 maintenance building roof repair cost $50,000. Lock 19 parking and utilities was initiated at a cost of $143,600. Thompson Causeway road repair was initiated at a cost of $325,600. Maintenance of roads and bridges, and of buildings, grounds, and utilities cost $49,600. Maintenance of public use areas was performed at a cost of $464,900, and maintenance and purchase of permanent operating equipment cost $489,200. 17-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN * Environmental compliance continued at a cost of $40,100. Real Estate support of maintenance activities cost $434,900. Engineering and design work was performed at a cost of $2,028,500 and asbuilt drawings continued at a cost of $300. Supervision, administration, and inspection for the maintenance costs were $19,620,800. Net credits to the project were $577,900, primarily as a result of collection from towboat companies for damages to lock and dam structures. Operating and care: Operation of the locks and dams and routine maintenance and minor repairs thereto were performed at a cost of $12,510,000. Real Estate management services were performed at a cost of $213,200. Natural and cultural resource activities were performed at a cost of $624,000. Public use areas and Mississippi River Visitors' Center were operated at a cost of $1,979,100. Surveys, various condition and operation studies and structural inspections cost $2,777,000. Water control management costs were $918,500 and the amount of $7,000 was expended on the Master Plans. Total operation costs were $19,028,800. Total Operation and maintenance costs were $38,649,600. Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation was continued at Locks and Dams 13, 14, and 15 for a total cost of $2,171, $4,513,453, and $4,244, respectively. Total rehabilitation costs were $4,519,868. Costs to the Rock Island District were $38,649,000 for operations and maintenance and $4,519,868 for major rehabilitation for a total cost of $43,169,468. St. Louis District. New Work: Costs incurred for Melvin Price Locks and Dam, formerly Lock and Dam 26 Replacement, were $49,363 for real estate acquisition; $541,200 for the dam, $73,745 for the locks, $99,075 for channels, $2,001,170 for buildings, grounds and utilities, $70,000 for permanent operating equipment, $368,967 for engineering, $278,985 for supervision and administration, and -$4,375 for miscellaneous. Cost for Melvin Price totaled $3,478,403. Costs incurred for the second lock were $26,500 for the lock, and $94,576 for engineering; for a total of $121,076. Total cost of new work was $3,599,479. Rehabilitation: Major rehabilitation continued in FY 1998 at Lock and Dam 25 with construction contracts and the preparation of contract documents at a cost of $7,808 for real estate, $300,000 for the dam, $6,619,278 for the lock, $492,172 for engineering, and $237,858 for supervision and administration. Costs for Lock and Dam 25 totaled $7,657,116. Major rehabilitation also continued at Lock and Dam 24 at a cost of $4,970 for real estate; $2,459,849 for the dam, $2,421,586 for the lock; $46,255 for channels; $639,431 for engineering; and $208,015 for supervision and administration. Costs for Lock and Dam 24 totaled $5,780,106. Total rehabilitation cost $13,437,764. Operating and care: The locks and dams were operated as required and necessary repairs were made thereto. Other work accomplished was management of natural resources, operation of recreation areas, condition and operation studies, water control management, and other studies and reports for a total cost of $5,037,957. Maintenance: $10,413,692. Total maintenance cost Costs to the St. Louis District were $3,599,479 for new work on the Melvin Price Locks and Dam and Second Lock; $13,437,764 for major rehabilitation, $15,451,649 for operations and maintenance for a total cost of $32,488,892. Total Federal costs of existing project to the end of fiscal year for the three Districts were $3,599,479 for new work; $94,949,282 regular funds for operation and maintenance; and $22,054,036 regular funds for rehabilitation. Total costs for FY 98 were $120,602,797. Condition of the channel at end of fiscal year: The controlling depths of nine feet at low water and minimum widths suitable for long-haul common carrier service were maintained in all pools. St. Paul District. Work completed: Locks and Dams at St. Anthony Falls and 1 to 10, inclusive, except for relatively minor appurtenant work; major improvements of channels and harbors at St. Paul and Minneapolis; small boat harbors and commercial harbors at Lake City, Red Wing, and Winona, MN; and Prairie du Chien, WI; small-boat harbors at St. Paul, Hastings, Red Wing, Wabasha, Lake City and Winona, MN; Lansing, IA; and Bay City, Pepin, Alma, and Prairie du Chien, WI; a remedial drainage ditch at Cochrane, WI; miscellaneous channel dredging and realignment; channel markers; pool clearing; and construction of various facilities for 17-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 recreation use. Seepage damages totaling $90,027 were paid to 210 claimants. Status of land and flowage acquisition: Approximately 51,546.46 acres of land in fee, including 47,305 acres used by the Department of the Interior in accordance with a cooperative agreement and general plans, and easements of 15,549.63 acres of land are owned or controlled in pools 1 to 10, inclusive, at end of fiscal year. In addition, fee title to 12.46 acres and perpetual easements on 2.98 acres of land for St. Anthony Falls and perpetual easements over 244.39 acres of land for harbors have been obtained and Department of the Army holds special rights over 62,954.74 acres owned by the Department of the Interior in pool Nos. 3 to 10, inclusive. Land acquisition is complete. Work remaining to complete portion of project in St. Paul District: None. Condition of channel at end of fiscal year: The controlling depths of 9 feet at low water and minimum for long-haul common carrier service were maintained in all pools. Rock Island District. Work completed: Major construction items including all locks and dams, are completed and in operation. The following related work has also been completed: construction of smallboat harbors at Rock Island, IL; Moline, IL; Andalusia, IL; Warsaw, IL; Fort Madison, IA; Davenport (Lindsay Park), IA; Muscatine, IA; Clinton, IA; and Hannibal, MO; improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, IA, for navigation; improvement of commercial harbor at Dubuque, IA; rehabilitation of old auxiliary lock at Lock and Dam 14; permanent closure of old Lock 19 and drydock; rock and conglomerate excavation in Pools 15 and 16; rectification of seepage damage in the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL; recreational facilities; and construction of visitor center at Lock and Dam 15. Status of land and flowage acquisition: Acquisition of land in Pools 11 to 22, inclusive consisting of 91,705.394 acres in fee and 11,591.151 acres in flowage easement, has been completed. Condition of the channel at end of fiscal year: The controlling depths of nine feet at low water and minimum widths suitable for long-haul common carrier service were maintained in all pools. Work remaining to complete portion of project in Rock Island District: None. St. Louis District. Work completed: Major construction items, including all locks and dams, are completed and in operation, with the exception of the remaining work at Melvin Price. Status of land and flowage acquisition: Acquisitions of land in Pools 24, 25, and 26, involving 4,448 acres of land in fee and flowage easements over 6,600 acres, is complete. A total of 4,201 acres has been acquired for the Melvin Price Locks and Dam project. Condition of channel at end of fiscal year: The controlling depth of nine feet at low water and generally suitable widths for long-haul common carrier services were maintained in all pools and between Melvin Price Locks and Dam and Missouri River. Work remaining to complete portion of project in St. Louis District: Work remaining at the Melvin Price Locks and Dam project includes a visitor center, esplanade, and access road. 17-4 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN TABLE 17-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 September 1998 Mississippi River New Work' between Missouri River Approp.2 $ 7,433,000 $ 3,831,000 $ 3,462,000 3,194,000 $1,187,452,629 and Minneapolis, Cost3 15,031,229 5,212,518 3,163,733 3,599,479 1,146,288,023 Minnesota (Federal Maint.4 Funds) Approp. 91,103,358 88,898,905 98,145,565 94,949,282 1,677,452,800 Cost 93,362,913 89,613,822 95,938,787 59,803,497 1,625,632,993 Rehab. Approp. 19,037,308 8,319,000 6,637,000 15,321,104 212,609,725 Cost 18,593,748 7,782,163 9,244,165 22,054,036 218,955,188 (Contributed Funds) New Work:5 Approp. 9,457,785 1,693,000 4,289,000 11,409,660 39,375,445 Cost 6,517,000 5,453,084 3,588,035 11,488,087 38,581,892 1. Includes $15,476,259 for new work on previous projects. 2. Includes Melvin Price Locks and Dam funds $936,655,900. 3. Includes Melvin Price Locks and Dam funds $936,375,314. 4. Includes $1,949,301 for maintenance on previous project. 5. Funding from Inland Waterways Trust Fund. TABLE 17-B TOTAL COSTS OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 Regular Public Work Emergency District Cost Funds Funds Relief Funds Total St. Paul New Work' $108,940,7902 24,210,071 $9,071,214 $ 142,222,075 Maintenance3 714,627,628 -- -- 714,627,628 Rehabilitation 83,092,855 -- -- 83,092,855 Total 906,661,273 24,210,071 9,071,214 939,942,558 Rock Island New Work4 71,307,9455 17,403,322 11,338,865 100,050,132 Maintenance6 112,291,349 -- -- 112,291,349 Rehabilitation 106,383,933 -- -- 106,383,933 Total 289,983,227 17,403,322 11,338,865 318,725,414 St. Louis New Work8 965,480,1317 10,282,566 2,440,266 978,202,963 Maintenance 305,460,527 -- -- 305,460,527 Rehabilitation 24,479,609 -- -- 24,479,609 Total 1,295,420,267 10,282,566 2,440,266 1,308,143,099 1. Excludes $2,041,140 contributed funds. Includes $7,673 expended in poo No. 11. 2. Includes $159,359 transferred from Rock Island District covering pro rata hare of cost of derrick boat Hercules. 3. Includes $762,196 expended between 1930 and 1936 on operating and car& of works of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. Excludes $797,670 tontributed funds. 4. Excludes $58,999 contributed funds. 5. $687,709 was transferred to St. Louis District in fiscal year 1958. Excludes $201,167 transferred to St. Paul and St. Louis Districts covering their pro rata share of cost of derrick boat HerCules. 6. Cost subsequent to FY 1953 included with operating and care. Includes the sum of $395,442, expended between 1930 and 1934 on the operating and care of the works of improvement under thk provisions of the permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 7. Includes $47,800 transferred from Rock Island District covering pro rata cost of derrick boat Hercules and $687,709 transferred from Rock Island District. 8. Includes $936,875,314 for Melvin Price Locks and Dam. 17-5 TABLE 17-C LOCKS AND DAMS Lock Dimensions Greatest Depth on Character of Foundation Percent Width Length Upper Miter Sill Complete Miles of Available Normal Locks, Year Estimated Cost of Above Cham- for Full Pool Dams, and Opened Each Lock and Ohio Miles from ber Width Lift Eleva- Upper Lower Work in to Navi- Dam Including Lock and Dam River Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) tion (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Pool gation Work in Pool St. Anthony Falls, upper Lock 853.9 St. Anthony 853.3 Falls, lower Lock and dam Lock and dam 1 847.6 Lock and dam 2 815.2 Lock and dam 3 796.9 Lock and dam 4 752.8 Lock and dam 5 738.1 Lock and dam 5A 728.5 Lock and dam 6 714.3 Lock and dam 7 702.5 Lock and dam 8 679.2 Lock and dam 9 647.9 Lock and dam 10 615.1 Lock and dam 11 583.0 In city of Minneapolis, MN In city of Minneapolis, MN Minneapolis- St. Paul, MN 1.3 above Hastings, MN 6.1 above Red Wing, MN Alma, WI 56 400 49.2 56 400 26.94 56 400 35.94 56 400 35.9 110 500 12.2 1108 6008 12.2 110 600 8.0 110 600 7.0 Minneiska, MN 110 600 9.0 3 above Winona, MN Trempealeau, WI 110 600 5.5 110 600 6.5 Dresbach, MN 110 600 8.0 Genoa, WI 3.3 below Lynxville, WI Guttenberg, IA 3.7 above Dubuque, IA Lock and dam 12 556.7 Bellevue, IA 110 600 11.0 110 600 9.0 110 600 8.0 110 600 11.0 110 600 9.0 799.2 15.7 13.7 Some lime- Limestone. 1002 stone, mainly sandstone. No piles. 750.0 13.7 10.3 Sandstone. No Sandstone. 100 piles 725.1 13.54 10.1 Rock and piles Piles in gravel. 100 -- 12.57 7.6 in gravel. -- 16.0 15.1 Piles in sand, Piles in sand, 100 687.2 22.2 13.0 silt and clay. silt and clay. 100 675.0 17.0 14.0 Piles in sand, Piles in sand. 100 silt and clay. 667,0 17.0 13.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand 100 and gravel, and gravel. 660.0 18.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand. 100 and gravel. 651,0 18.0 12.5 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 100 645.5 17.0 12.5 Piles in sand, Piles in sand 100 gravel and and clay. silt. 639.0 18.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand. 100 and gravel. 631.0 22.0 14.0 Piles in sand, Piles in sand 100 gravel and and gravel. broken rock. 620.0 16.0 13.0 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 100 611.0 15.0 12.0 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 100 603.0 18.5 12.5 Piles in sand, Piles in sand. 99 gravel and silt. 592.0 17.0 13.0 Piles in sand and gravel. Piles in sand 99 and gravel. -- $ 18,203,0003 1959 12,382,000 1917 1930 1948 1938 1935 1935 1936 1936 1937 1937 1938 1936 1937 1938 2,358,0006 6,492,0009 5,596,000 4,865,000 5,081,000 4,549,000 4,874,000 5,574,000 6,061,000 6,539,000 4,750,000 7,428,000 5,580,000 0 I 0 0 0 O A a 0 0 a 0n LOCKS AND DAMS Lock Dimensions Greatest Depth on Character of Foundation Percent Width Length Upper Miter Sill Complete Miles of Available Normal Locks, Year Estimated Cost of Above Cham- for Full Pool Dams, and Opened Each Lock and Ohio Miles from ber Width Lift Eeva- Upper Lower Work in to Navi- Dam Including Lock and Dam River Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) tion (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Pool gation Work in Pool Lock and dam 13 522.5 Lock and dam 14 493.3 Le Claire Lock 493.1 (Canal) Lock and dam 15 482.9 Lock and dam 16 457.2 -J Lock and dam 17 437.1 Lock and dam 18 410.5 Lock and dam 19 364.2 Lock and dam 20 343.2 Lock and dam 21 324.9 Lock and dam 22 301.2 Lock and dam 24 273.4 Lock and dam 25 241.4 Lock and dam 26 202.9 (Henry T. Rainey Dam) s 4.3 above 110 Clinton, IA 3.7 below 110 Le Claire, IA 3.9 below 80 Le Claire, IA Foot of Arsenal 110 Island, Rock 110 Island, IL 1.8 above 110 Muscatine, IA 4.2 above New 110 Boston, IL 6.5 above 110 Burlington, IA Keokuk, IA 110 110 0.9 above 110 Canton, MO 2.1 below 110 Quincy, IL 1.5 below 110 Saverton, MO Clarksville, MO 110 Cap Au Gris, MO 110 Alton, IL 110 110 600 11.0 600 11.0 320 11.0 600 16.0 360 16.0 600 9.0 600 8.0 600 9.8 358 38.2 1,200 600 10.0 600 10.5 600 10.2 600 15.0 600 15.0 600 24.0 360 24.0 583.0 19.0 13.0 Piles in sand, clay and gravel. 527.0 20.5 13.5 Rock. -- 17.6 10.9 Rock. 561.0 24.0" 11.0 Rock. -- 17.0" 11.0 545.0 17.0 12.0 Piles in sand and gravel. 536.0 16.0 13.0 Piles in sand and gravel. 528.0 16.5 13.7 Piles in sand. 518.2 4.5 9.2 Rock. 5.0 13.0 480.0 15.0 12.0 Rock. 470.0 459.5 449.0 434.0 419.0 16.5 18.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 16.0 12.0 Piles in sand and gravel. 13.8 Rock. 12.0 Rock and piles. 12.0 Piles in sand and gravel. 10.0 Piles in sand. 10.0 Piles in sand 100 and gravel. Rock. 92 Rock. 100 Rock. 100 Piles in sand 98 and gravel. Piles in sand. 99 Piles in sand. 90 Rock. 100 99 Rock and 97 piles in sand and gravel. Piles in sand 95 and gravel. Rock. 99 Piles in sand. 9914 Piles in sand 9914 and gravel. Piles and sand. 100 1938 7,502,000 1939 1922 1934 1937 1939 1937 1913 1957 1936 1938 1938 1940 1939 1938 6,284,000 1to 14,201,000 9,788,000 5,843,000 10,308,000 14,813,00012 6,281,000 8,065,000 5,275,000 10,337,000 13,694,000 12,824,000 TABLE 17-C (Continued) bd x 0 0 r �/3 P �t3 TABLE 17-C (Continued) LOCKS AND DAMS Lock Dimensions Greatest Depth on Character of Foundation Percent Width Length Upper Miter Sill Complete Miles of Available Normal Locks, Year Estimated Cost of Above Cham- for Full Pool Dams, and Opened Each Lock and Ohio Miles from ber Width Lift Eleva- Upper Lower Work in to Navi- Dam Including Lock and Dam River Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) tion' (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Pool gation Work in Pool Melvin Price 200.8 Alton, IL 110 1,200 24.0 419.0 23.0 18.0 Piles to bedrock. Piles to 97 1990 745,009,000 Locks and Dam bedrock. Melvin Price 200.8 Alton, IL 110 600 24.0 419.0 42.0 18.0 Piles to bedrock. Piles to 93 1994 226,000,000 Locks and Dam bedrock. (2nd Lock) Total, Locks and dams $1,196,556,000 Elevation of pools 1 to 22 and at St. Anthony Falls are mean sea level 1912 adjustment: pools 24, 26 are mean sea level 1929 adjustment. Includes existing dam, owned by Northern States Power Co. Includes dredging above upper lock. (Federal cost only.) Based on pool elevation 723.1 in pool 1 which is crest of dam. Pool is normally maintained at elevation 725.1 by flashboards. Includes lower approach dredging and dredging between upper and lower rock. (Federal cost only.) In addition $1,948,000 expended from previous projects and $1,349,600 from O & M appropriation for first of twin locks. Excludes lock and dam rehabilitation program. Old upper guard sill. Landward lock. In addition, $1,965,300 expended from previous projects. Existing Le Claire Canal lock is used as auxiliary to lock 14; previous project cost $540,000. Depth over upper poiree sill. Depth over upper miter sill is 27 feet, at lock 15. $640,868 for first lock was reported by Mississippi River Power Company, transferred to Government free in lieu of improvements destroyed. (Annual Report, 1928, pp. 1118-1119.) Present estimate includes $13,132,600 for main lock and appurtenant work. Includes cash contribution of $4,900,000. Complete except for guidewall extensions. Lock and Dam 26 has been replaced by the Melvin Price Locks and Dam at which full pool was raised 1 February 1990. Lock and Dam 26 has been removed. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 'vO y0 0 z 0 0c O z C C O nn H O 7 00 TABLE 17-D HARBOR IMPROVEMENTS Project Approximate size (feet) Actual or Miles above depth Percent Estimated Name Ohio River Location Type (feet) Width Length Complete Cost St. Paul Harbor, MN Hastings Harbor, MN Red Wing Harbor, MN Red Wing Harbor, MN Bay City Harbor, WI Lake City Harbor, MN Pepin Harbor, WI Wabasha Harbor, MN Alma Harbor, WI Winona Harbors, MN Lansing Harbor, IA Prairie du Chien Harbor, WI Dubuque Harbor, IA Savanna Harbor, IL Clinton Harbor, IA Moline Harbor, IL Davenport Harbor, IA (Lindsay Park) Rock Island Harbor, IL Andalusia Harbor, IL Muscatine Harbor, IA Fort Madison Harbor, IA 836.5-839.2 839.7 813.2 791.4 791.1 785.9 773.0 767.1 760.0 751.3 726.0 726.2 663.3 635.5 635.0 579.4 537.3 519.0 488.0 484.2 479.8 473.0 455.5 455.6 383.7 In city of St. Paul, MN Channel improvement, Small-boat harbor and channel enlargement. Lower end of city of Hastings, MN In city of Red Wing, MN In city of Red Wing, MN Upper end of Bay City, WI In city of Lake City, MN In city of Pepin, WI Upper end of city of Wabasha, MN Upper end of Alma, WI In city of Winona, MN Latsch Island Crooked Slough Upper end of city of Lansing, IA Upper end of city of Prairie du Chien, WI In Marais de St. Friol East Channel below Hwy bridges. At Dubuque, IA At Savanna, IL At Clinton, IA At Moline, IL At Lindsay Park At Rock Island, IL Andalusia Slough At Muscatine, IA At Fort Madison, IA Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Commercial3 Small-boat3 Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Entrance channel small-boat harbor Small-boat Small-boat Freight terminal approach channel Small-boat 9 400-1,000 5 300 5 9 5 5 5 9 9 55 5 5 9 5 5 9 12 5 5 5 5 200 300 450 50-100 400 500 500 50 175-400 300 200 200 170 400 340 280 400 230 200 100 40 150 200 250 900 100 184,200 2.7(mile) 400 500 1,200 800 5,990 600 1,000 850 600 800 500 1,000 6,000 500 800 1,000 frontage 1,500 910 1,400 660 1,150 1,100 435 950 1,890 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 0 78 100 100 100 100 100 $ 217,100 230,200 74,300 146,800' 8,700 39,4002 93,500 1,077,0004 205,500s 41,700 56,300 89,800 84,700 95,300 85,500 93,100 55,200 310,000 101,912 110,328 262,100 31,000 21,000 353,000 j, 0 0 0 ., a rd TABLE 17-D (Continued) HARBOR IMPROVEMENTS Project Approximate size (feet) Actual or Miles above depth Percent Estimated Name Ohio River Location Type (feet) Width Length Complete Cost Warsaw Harbor, IL 359.1 At Warsaw, IL Small-boat 5 100 600 100 73,000 Quincy Harbor, IL 327.3 In Quincy Bay, IL Small-boat 5 200-300 9,000 0 -- Hannibal Harbor, MO 308.8 At Hannibal, MO Small-boat 5 180-260 600 100 129,000 Total $4,269,640 1. In addition, local interests contributed $3,455. 2. In addition, local interests contributed $9,533. 3. Commercial harbor converted to small-boat harbor under authority of Section 107 of 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Primary use is small-boat, although some commercial activity exists. 4. In addition, local interests contributed $812,599. 5. In addition, local interests contributed $32,344. 6. Maintenance only, estimated at $5,000 annually. 0 ro 0 H Cif 0 0Y O 0 O 2 n O 7d 00 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN TABLE 17-E ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO COST OF PROJECT Facilities for public use, convenience and safety $ 22,710,000 Rectification of damages caused by seepage and backwater 9,114,0001 Regulating works between Melvin Price Locks and Dam and Missouri River 545,000 Improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, Iowa, for navigation 193,600 Miscellaneous 11,716,9002 Total additional features 18,705,9003 Total existing project (new work) $ 516,183,512 1. Includes a lump-sum payment of $2,146,800 (O&M appropriation) paid to the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL, for rectification of seepage damages. Also includes $140,000 Construction General funds for project studies, evaluation, and report preparation. 2. Includes $686,500 for repairs to Stone Arch Bridge, Minneapolis, MN. (FY 1969) 3. Excludes $227,000 (1965) for inactive remedial measures at Sandy Slough, MO. TABLE 17-F LICENSE FEES COLLECTED THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1998 Annual Collections to Dam Licensee Charge Sept. 30, 1998 St. Anthony Falls Lower Northern States Power $ 3,300 $ 119,677 Lock and Dam Co. (No. 2056) Lock and Dam No. 1 Ford Motor Co. 95,400 6,966,240 Lock and Dam No. 2 City of Hastings, MN. 24,163 253,351 TOTAL $ 7,339,268 17-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 17-G AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Sep. 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 as amended by P.R. No. 10, Feb. 24, 1932 June 26, 1934 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Dec. 22, 1944 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 None Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Work Authorized MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN Dredging channels to landing places. Project adopted from Illinois River to Minneapolis; Chief of Engineers granted discretionary authority to make such modification in plan as may be deemed advisable.4 Operation of snag boats and operation and care of locks and dams to be provided for with funds from Department of the Army appropriations for rivers and harbors. Missouri River established as lower limit of project. Extension of 9-foot channel above St. Anthony Falls, MN, including adequate terminal facilities for Minneapolis, MN St. Paul, MN harbor. Determine damages to drainage and levee districts caused by seepage and backwater, and cost of making rectification thereof. Public park and recreational facilities. Red Wing, MN harbor. Remedial works to correct damages caused by seepage and backwater at Cochrane, WI Such changes or additions to payments, remedial works, or land acquisitions authorized by River and Harbor Act of Aug. 26, 1937 (River and Harbor Committee Doc. 34, 75th Cong., 1st sess.), as Chief of Engineers deems advisable. St. Paul, MN channel enlargements, small boat harbor, and roadway. Vertical bridge clearance at Minneapolis to 26 feet above estimated stage for discharge of 40,000 c.f.s Winona, MN basin. Future modification of lock and dam No. 2 for power development. Provides for cash contribution by local interests in lieu of alteration of privately owned bridges and utilities for St. Anthony Falls project. Lake City, MN harbor. Wabasha, MN harbor. Payment of damages caused by backwater and seepage, pools 3 to 11. Hastings, MN harbor. Lansing, IA harbor. Fort Madison, IA harbor. Payment of damages caused by pool No. 14 at Clinton, IA. Davenport, IA harbor. Muscatine, IA harbor. Alma, WI harbor. Hannibal, MO harbor. Prairie du Chien, WI harbors. Opposite Hamburg, IL harbor.' Documents None H. Doc. 290, 71st Cong., 2d sess. None H. Doc. 137, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 137, 72nd Cong. 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 44, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 34, 75th Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 103, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 137, 76th Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 547, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. S. Doc. 54, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 263, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 432, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 449, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 511, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 514, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 515, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 559, 79th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 192, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 661, 80th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 197, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 642, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 733, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 66, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 67, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 71, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 254, 81st Cong., 1st sess. 17-12 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN TABLE 17-G AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 Permits such change in location of Winona, MN small boat basin None authorized by River and Harbor Act of Mar. 2, 1945 (H. Doc. 263, 77th Cong., 1st sess.), as Chief of Engineers deems advisable. Sep. 3, 1954 Construction of Crooked Slough Harbor at Winona, MN, in lieu H. Doc. 347, 83rd Cong., 2d sess. of previously authorized commercial harbor. Sep. 3, 1954 Payment of damages caused by pool No. 24 at Louisiana, MO. H. Doc. 251, 82nd Cong., 1st sess. July 3, 1958 Permits modification of vertical bridge clearances and authorizes H. Doc. 33, 85th Cong., 1st sess. completion of St. Anthony Falls project. July 3, 1958 Small boat and commercial harbors at Alton, IL.2 H. Doc. 136, 84th Cong., 1st sess. July 3, 1958 Payment of lump sum amounts for damages to drainage and levee H. Doc. 135, 84th Cong., 1st sess. districts caused by operation of navigation pools. July 3, 1958 Improvement and maintenance of Beaver Slough at Clinton, IA. H. Doc. 345, 84th Cong., 2d sess. Mar. 3, 1959 Reconstruction of structures as may be necessary to provide None adequate facilities for existing navigation. July 14, 1960 Construction of Industrial Harbor at Red Wing, MN. H. Doc. 32, 86th Cong., 1st sess. Oct. 23, 1962 Construction of small-boat harbors at Savanna2, Moline, H. Doc. 513, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Andalusia, New Bostons, Warsaw, Quincy, and Grafton, IL; Bellevue', Clinton, Davenport, and Keokuk3, IA; St. Paul (Harriet Island), MNS; and Bay City, Pepin, and Cassville s, WI. Oct. 23, 1962 Payment of damages caused by pool 24 at Clarksville, MO. H. Doc. 552, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Oct. 23, 1962 Remedial works at Sandy Slough, MO. H. Doc. 419, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Nov. 7, 1966 Repair of Stone Arch Bridge at Minneapolis, MN. None Oct. 21, 1978 Replacement of Lock and Dam 26 Public Law 95-502 Dec. 29, 1981 Change name of Lock and Dam 26 to Melvin Price Locks and Dam Public Law 97-118 effective on the date of Melvin Price's death. (Apr. 22, 1988 - date of death) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Deauthorized FY 75. Inactive. Deauthorized FY 87 (WRDA of 1986). Guidewalls at Locks 3, 4, 5, 5A, 7, 8, 9, and 10 deauthorized FY 87 (WRDA of 1986). Deauthorized FY 90 (WRDA of 1986). Guidewall extensions at Locks 16, 18, and 21; construction of mooring facilities at Locks and Dams 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18; upper approach improvement at Lock 19 and Lock and Dam 20; and rock and/or conglomerate excavation in Pools 14, 18, and 21 deauthorized FY 90 (WRDA of 1986). 17-13 PITTSBURGH, PA DISTRICT * This District comprises part of eastern Ohio, western Pennsylvania, southwestern New York, northern West Virginia, and northwestern Maryland embraced in drainage basin of Ohio River and Tributaries above mile 127 (below Pittsburgh), immediately upstream from New Martinsville, W. Va. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation - Locks and Dams ......... Page 1. Allegheny River, PA.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18-2 2. Construction of locks and dams,Ohio River... . 18-2 3. Monongahela River, PA and WV.... . . . . . . 18-2 4. Open-channel work, Ohio River... .... .... 18-3 5. Tygart Lake, WV.................. 18-3 6. Other authorized navigation projects. . . . . . 18-4 Flood Control - Local Protection 7. Chartiers Creek, PA.... ............. 8. Elkins, WV..................... 9. Johnstown, PA... ................ 10. Punxsutawney, Ohio River Basin, PA... .... 11. Saw Mill Run, Pittsburgh, PA ......... 12. South Central, PA Environment Improvement Program .................... .. 13. Turtle Creek, PA ................ 14. West Virginia and Pennsylvania Flood Control 18-4 18-4 18-5 18-5 18-5 18-5 18-6 18-6 Flood Control - Reservoirs 15. Berlin Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH... ..... 18-7 16. Conemaugh River Lake,Ohio River Basin, PA. 18-7 17. Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA.. . 18-8 18. East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA.. .... . . . . . . . . . 18-8 19. Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, PA and NY . . . . . . . . . 18-8 20. Lower Girard Dam, OH. .... . . . . . . . . 18-8 21. Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA.... .. 18-9 22. Mahoning Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA ............... 18-9 23. Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, OH. ............ . 18-9 24. Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH 18-10 25. Ohio River Basin (Pittsburgh District) . ... 18-10 26. Shenango River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA and OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18-10 27. Stonewall Jackson Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV.... . . . . . . . . . . . 18-11 28. Tionesta Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA. .... 18-11 29. Union City Dam, Ohio River Basin, PA. . . . 18-12 30. Woodcock Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA. 18-12 31. Youghiogheny River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA and MD. .............. . . . . . . 18-13 32. Inspection of completed flood control projects. 18-13 33. Other authorized flood control projects . ... 18-13 34. Flood control work under special authorization. . . . . . . . .. . . . . 18-13 General Investigations 35. Surveys.... .................. 36. Collection and study of basic data........ 37. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design... 38. Research and development... ........ 39. Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment. ............... 40. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration ....... Tables 18-13 18-13 18-13 18-14 . 18-14 . 18-14 Table 18-A Cost & Financial Statement. .... 18-15 Table 18-B Authorizing Legislation. ........ 18-19 Table 18-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects . . . . . . . . . ... . .18-23 Table 18-D Not Applicable. Table 18-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects... ............... 18-24 Table 18-F Not Applicable. Table 18-G Deauthorized Projects. . .. . . . . 18-26 Table 18-H Allegheny River Statistics. ..... 18-27 Table 18-I Monongahela River Statistics. ..... 18-28 Table 18-J Monongahela River Total Costs.... 18-30 Table 18-K Ohio River Basin Reservoirs. .... 18-30 Table 18-L Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects. ........... . 18-31 Table 18-M Flood Control Work Under Special Special Authorization........... 18-32 18-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1998 Navigation - Locks and Dams 1. ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA Location. The Allegheny River is 321 miles long. It rises in northern Pennsylvania, flows northwestward into New York, thence generally southwestward to Pittsburgh, PA, where it joins with Monongahela River to form the Ohio. (See Geological Survey Charts for western Pennsylvania and southwestern New York.) Existing project. The project consists of eight locks and dams to afford slack-water navigation for a length of 72 miles from Pittsburgh, PA to above East Brady, PA. Controlling depth through canalized portion is 9 feet at normal pool level. Channel width varies from a minimum of 200 feet to full width of river at mouth. Existing project is complete, the last lock, No. 9, was placed in service in 1938. All locks and dams are in fair condition. Navigation channel has been widened at certain points and, in general, maintained to project depth, thus affording adequate depth for passage of commercial tows. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. City of Pittsburgh constructed a modern wharf for river freight. There are numerous privately maintained terminals and docks, consisting of tipples, various types of hoists, chutes, and pipelines for use in loading and unloading coal, stone, sand, gravel, petroleum products, steel products, and other commodities. Transshipment of freight between river and railroads is handled at privately owned river-to-rail terminals. Existing private terminals are adequate for shipments and receipt in Pittsburgh District of type of commerce now in existence. Operations & Maintenance, General: During FY 98 there were no major maintenance and repair contracts on the Allegheny River. Major work accomplished by Government hired labor on the Allegheny River included renovating filling and emptying valves at Lock 4 at a cost of $175,000, renovating downstream lock gate anchorages at Lock 5 at a cost of $251,000 and replacing land wall emptying valve and operating machinery at Lock 2 at a cost of $220,000. 2. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER See this heading under Ohio River portion. 3. MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV Location. Formed by junction of Tygart and West Fork Rivers about 1 mile south of Fairmont, WV, and flows northerly for 128.7 miles to its junction with Allegheny River, forming Ohio River at Pittsburgh, PA (See Geological Survey Charts for southwestern Pennsylvania and northern West Virginia.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1963, page 1070. Existing project. Provides for improvement of river by 9 locks and dams to afford slack-water navigation for its entire length from Pittsburgh to above Fairmont, WV. Original locks and dams 7, 8 and 9 were replaced by new locks and dams 7 and 8 in 1925. Increased traffic necessitated enlargement and improvement of locks and dams 1 to 6 between Pittsburgh and Rices Landing, PA, by building two parallel chambers and fixed concrete dams during 1905 and 1932. Locks and dam 1 were eliminated in 1938 by raising Emsworth Dam, Ohio River. Reconstruction of lock 2 was completed in 1953 to provide two modern navigation chambers. The existing locks and dam 2 were originally completed in 1907; major modifications were made in 1923 and 1924, and in 1926 the upper guard and guide walls were extended. Construction of Maxwell locks and dam and the reconstruction of dam 4 have allowed for removal of obsolete locks and dams 5 and 6. Small and antiquated original locks and dams 10 to 15, inclusive, have been replaced by three modern structures. Morgantown lock and dam, initial step in replacement program, was completed in 1950 replacing locks and dams 10 and 11. Hildebrand lock and dam, next upstream, was completed in 1959 replacing locks and dams 12 and 13. Raising crest of dam 8 was also completed in 1959 as part of upper river improvement and eliminates restricted depth in upper reach of pool. Opekiska lock and dam was completed in 1967 replacing locks and dams 14 and 15. Completion of this link in upper river replacement program provides for entire river length of minimum channel depth of 9 feet, varying in width from a minimum of 250 feet to practically full width at mouth. Locks and dam 3 showed advanced stages of deterioration and, because of its strategic location and its importance to industry throughout the Greater Pittsburgh area and the nation, emergency remedial work had to be done in 1977. Major rehabilitation of locks and dam 3 was completed on Oct. 27, 1980. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the replacement of Lock and Dam 7 with Grays Landing Lock and Dam and the construction of a new lock landward of the existing lock at Lock and Dam 8 (renamed Point Marion Lock and Dam). In accordance with the provisions of this act, 50% of the total cost of construction for the Grays Landing and Point Marion projects was derived from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. Construction of a new lock at Point Marion was competed and put into service in December 1993. Construction of a new lock at Grays Landing was completed and put into service in May 1993. Construction of the dam at Grays Landing was completed in December 1995. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. City of Pittsburgh constructed a modern wharf for freight. Boat landings are maintained by some municipalities along the river. A large number of tipples at mines and various types of hoists at manufacturing plants and sand and gravel supply companies are maintained for private use in loading and unloading coal, coke, billets, steel products, sand, gravel, and other commodities. These terminals and docks are not available for general commerce. A number of docks and pipelines are also privately maintained for petroleum and acid products. Marine ways are maintained by some of the larger industries. These are also several terminals for rail-toriver and river-to-rail transfer. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. 18-2 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of the new Grays Landing dam was completed in December 1995 at an approximate cost of $25,000,000. Construction of the lock was completed in May, 1993 at a contract cost of approximately $80,000,000. Removal of the old fixed crest dam and river lock wall at Lock and Dam 7 was completed in FY 96 at a cost of $2,800,000. Work continues on cultural resources and the acquisition of real estate for the remainder of the project. The present project consists of 84 acres of fee land and 403.3 acres of easement. The estimated total cost of the project, which is scheduled to be complete in September 2000, is $181,000,000. Construction of the new lock for the Point Marion Project was completed in December, 1993 at a cost of $78,800,000. Land acquired for the project consists of 58 acres of fee land and 77.4 acres of easement. The estimated total cost of the Point Marion project is $111,700,000. Approximately $300,000 of closeout work remains to be completed and two outstanding contractor claims must be resolved. The Water Resources Development Act of 1992 authorized the District to proceed with navigation improvements on the Lower Monongahela River. The project includes replacement of the fixed crest dam at Locks and Dam 2 with a gated dam; raising the existing pool 2 by 5 feet, construction of twin 84' x 720' locks at Locks and Dam 4, and the elimination of Locks and Dam 3; lowering the existing pool 3 by 3.2 feet. The changes in pool elevations will adversely affect numerous municipally-owned facilities, which the Corps will adjust at project cost. The FY 1996 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Bill includes $15 million for the project. In February 1996, a $606K contract was awarded for the procurement of 750 tons of PS31 sheet pile for the renovation and extension of the Locks 2 upper guardwall. In April 1996, a $3.4 million contract was awarded for this upper guardwall work. The Fiscal Year 1997 appropriation of $16.2 million was used to continue design and construction activities and the upper guardwall work which was completed in December 1997. Approximately $5.5 million of FY 97 funds were surplus for use in Fiscal Year 1998. The Fiscal Year 1998 Appropriation Act contains $12.7 million for the project, which will allow the first two construction contracts for the new gated Dam 2 to begin in the spring of 1998. Operations and Maintenance, General: During FY 98 there were no major maintenance and repair contracts on the Monongahela River. Major work accomplished by Government hired labor on the Monongahela River included renovating middle wall filling valve tainter valve and operating machinery at Maxwell at a cost of $625,000, dewatering 84' x 720' lock chamber and renovating miter gates at Opekiska at a cost of $873,000, dewatering 58' x 360' river chamber and renovating lock gates, miter sills and cylindrical valves at Lock 3 at a cost of $1,570,000, and repairing wall armor at a Lock 4 at a cost of $202,000. 4. OPEN-CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER See this heading under Ohio River portion. 5. TYGART LAKE, WV Location. Tygart Lake is located on the Tygart River in Taylor and Barbour Counties, northcentral WV. The lake is approximately 26 road miles due east of Clarksburg, WV and 30 road miles south of Morgantown. The dam is situated 22.7 river miles above the mouth of the Tygart River at Fairmont, or 2.25 miles upstream from Grafton, WV, and about 78 miles south of Pittsburgh, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Fairmont, Thornton, and Belington, WV.) Existing project. A reservoir for low water regulation and flood control. Dam is concrete gravity type with an uncontrolled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides. Project was authorized by Public Works Administration January 11, 1934, and adopted by 1935 River and Harbor Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for low water control in Monongahela River and for purpose of flood protection in Monongahela and Ohio Valleys. Construction of dam was started in 1935 and placed in operation in 1938. Present project lands consist of 2,662.9 acres in fee, flowage easements over 1,216.9 acres and 1,731.9 acres of other easements. Local cooperation. The State of West Virginia has assumed responsibility for the development and operation of hunting and fishing areas as well as the Tygart Lake State Park. Controlled releases for downstream navigation and recreation are also coordinated with others to the extent feasible. No local cooperation is required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. A cost-sharing agreement was executed with the West Virginia Department of Recreation in May 1981. Licenses. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission granted a license to the City of Grafton for construction of a non-Federal hydropower facility at this project (FERC license 7307). Details of the design and other issues are still being finalized. The deadline for the start of project construction expired on April 15, 1995; however, the developer has requested an extension. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance, General: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low water regulation, as required, and project structures were operated and maintained in a serviceable condition throughout the year. Contract for Low Flow Valve Replacement, in the amount of $823,324, was started in FY 98 and will be completed in FY 98. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for FY 98 were $26,400,000; total benefits through September 30, 1997, revised to reflect damages prevented in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District, were $1,018,772,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. This work was limited in 18-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1998 scope as the State of West Virginia has jurisdiction over most of the recreation in the reservoir area. Tygart Dam is a candidate for the Dam Safety Program. An Evaluation Report was initiated in March 1994 to address spillway capacity and structural stability in relation to the probable maximum flood event. The report was approved in March 1996. Findings of the report concluded that under present conditions, the probable maximum flood would overtop the dam and cause failure. The report recommends protecting the dam from failure to include downstream erosion protection and stilling basin modifications. The Design Memorandum was completed in September 1998. The project features include construction of a new road to provide access to the left bank abutement of the dam, new concrete channels consisting of a concrete wall (end sill) and concrete slope paving on the downstream side of the dam, new concrete lagging retaining walls on the left and right banks of the dam, modification of the existing parapet wall, and minor repairs to the roadway decking. 6. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 18-C on other authorized navigation projects. Flood Control - Local Protection 7. CHARTIERS CREEK, PA Location. Within Washington and Allegheny Counties, southwestern Pennsylvania, a tributary of Ohio River. (See Geological Survey Chart for Carnegie, PA) Existing project. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965 and provides for channel widening, deepening and realignment, construction of a major channel cutoff, and relocations in two separate and independent reaches. James G. Fulton project in Allegheny County would be about 13.4 miles long and Canonsburg- Houston reach in Washington County about 4.7 miles long. Completed improvements would contain within banks, all floods up to the 1912 maximum of record, but with some residual damage, and would greatly reduce flood stages and damages resulting from higher floods. James G. Fulton Flood Control Project-Construction of Unit 1 was started in July 1968, completed in September 1970, and turned over to local interests for operation and maintenance on June 25, 1971. Construction of Unit 2 was started in April 1970, completed in April 1973, and turned over to local interests on November 22, 1974. Construction of Unit 3 was started in July 1971 and was completed in December 1974. Construction of Unit 5 was started in June 1972 and was completed in December 1973. Construction of Unit 4 channel improvement was started in July 1978, completed in June 1981 and turned over to local interests on 18 November 1981. A contract for Environmental Improvement, Unit 4, James G. Fulton, was awarded in Sep 1981 and completed in Dec 1981. Canonsburg-Houston Reach-Construction of Unit 1 was started in December of 1968, completed in March 1970, and turned over to local interests for operation and maintenance on August 10, 1970. Construction of Unit 2A was started January 17, 1976, completed December 16, 1976, and turned over to local interests on June 9, 1977. Construction plans and specifications for Unit 2B, the remaining unit of the reach, were 99% complete. Remaining work on the original project was not completed due to the inability of local cooperating agency to provide the necessary rights-of-way. Major flooding in Houston, PA in September, 1990 has generated renewed interest in completion of the project. Estimated cost for new work (1985) is $41,850,000 of which $32,750,000 is Federal cost and $9,100,000 non- Federal cost. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperating agency (Washington County) has been unable to provide the necessary rights-of-way for the remaining Unit 2B. Direct non-Federal contributions have been made in the amount of $4,225,188. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The district re-evaluated the previously designed Unit 2B channel improvement project and determined that the project, as originally designed, was no longer economically feasible. After consideration of alternative plans, the district determined that the erection of floodwalls around the areas most susceptible to damages was an economically feasible option. A draft GRR was presented to the local sponsor , Washington County and Houston Borough. Neither the County nor the Borough approved of the recommended alternative and the Unit 2B project has been terminated. Regular inspections were made at completed units. Cumulative flood control benefits achieved through FY 98 were estimated to be $51,773,000. 8. ELKINS, WV Location. On Tygart River in north-central Randolph County, WV, about 155 miles south of Pittsburgh, PA. It is at downstream end of a long, broad reach of upper Tygart Valley, about 75 miles above mouth of river. (See Geological Survey Chart for Elkins, WV). Existing project. Provides flood protection by diverting flood discharges from upstream arm of loop of natural river channel into an artificial cutoff channel, thereby bypassing City of Elkins. Improvement is designed to accommodate discharges equivalent to maximum flood of reasonable expectancy. Project construction was started in May 1946 and completed in May 1949. Completed works, except that portion of.channel maintained by Federal Government, has been operated and maintained by City of Elkins since March 31, 1949. Present project lands consist of 32.04 acres in fee and 526.01 acres in easements. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1222. Federal cost of completed project was $1,772,627; estimated non-Federal cost for lands, easements, and rights-of-way was $40,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Routine investigations and inspections were made. Project was last inspected in October 1997. Flood damages prevented through FY 98 were estimated to be $19,669,000. 18-4 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT 9. JOHNSTOWN, PA Location. Project is located in southwestern Cambria County, PA, about 58 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. It is in a deep and comparatively narrow valley at junction of Stoney Creek and Little Conemaugh River, which unite to form Conemaugh River. (See Geological Survey Chart for Johnstown, PA.) Existing project. Provides for increased channel capacity by enlarging and realigning channels and protecting banks with concrete pavement. Improvement designed to accommodate discharges equivalent to those of March 1936 flood, maximum natural flow of record, minimum of overbank flow and to practically eliminate damages therefrom. Project construction began in August 1938 and was completed in November 1943. Footer protection for Unit 4 was completed in November 1949. Present project lands consist of easements over 199 acres. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1937. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1215. Local cooperation. The rules of local cooperation for the rehabilitation of the existing project are governed by the FY 91 Energy and Water Resources Appropriations Act. Pursuant to this Act, the City of Johnstown will have a limited role in securing the needed rights of access to non-federal structures included in the line of protection and will hold and save the United States from damages due to construction or operation and maintenance of the work on the non-federal structures, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: The FY 1991 Energy and Water Resources Development Appropriations Act authorized and directed the Corps to undertake a major rehabilitation of the existing project. The Project Design Memorandum was approved in June 1995. The major rehabilitation work is to be accomplished under the Construction, General appropriation at an estimate cost of $32.5 million. Contract plans and specifications were initiated in July 1995. The first of four construction contracts was awarded in August 1997. The second of four construction contracts will be awarded in February 1999. The project is scheduled to be physically complete in September 2002. The work consists of the repair of 54 exisiting wall sections, slope paving and replacement of balustrade (safety) wall. Also included in the major rehabilitation during FY 97 is the acquisition of approximately 1.30 acres of land for permanent channel improvement, subsurface anchor easements and temporary work easements within Units 3, 5 and 6. Twenty-eight tracts of land were affected by the acquisition of these easements. Additional easements were acquired prior to awarding the first construction contract in June 1997. Flood damages prevented by the project through September 30, 1997 were estimated to be $800,971,000. 10. PUNXSUTAWNEY, PA Location. Borough of Punxsutawney is on Mahoning Creek in Jefferson County, PA, about 85 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. It is on a comparatively wide, alluvial flood plain about 52 miles above mouth of stream and 30 miles above Mahoning Creek flood control dam. (See Geological Survey Charts for Punxsutawney and Smicksburg, PA.) Existing project. Provides flood protection by channel enlargement, dikes, and walls. Improvement is designed to accommodate discharges 20% greater than that of maximum flood of record. Construction was accomplished by construction of four units. Construction started in May 1946 and was completed in June 1950. Present project lands consist of perpetual easements over 72.6 acres. Completed works, except that portion of channel maintained by the Federal Government have been operated and maintained by Borough of Punxsutawney since July 31, 1950. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1209. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general. Operation Activities continued and routine investigations and inspections were made. Total flood damages prevented through FY 98 were estimated to be $71,517,000. 11. SAW MILL RUN, PITTSBURGH, PA Location: The project is located within the City of Pittsburgh, Allegheny County, at Ohio River Mile 0.7 and traverses upstream from the mouth of Saw Mill Run approximately 4,700 L.F. Existing Project: The proposed project was authorized in WRDA of 1986 in accordance with the Chief of Engineers report dated 30 January 1978. The WRDA 1996 increased the project estimate to $12,780,000, the current project estimate in 1994 dollars. In FY 97 this project was included in the FY 97 appropriations as a new construction start. Local Cooperation: The City of Pittsburgh is the local sponsor for this project and is responsible for real estate acquisition and relocation design and construction. The project will be cost shared 75% Federal and 25% non-federal in accordance with the requirements of WRDA 86. Operations during fiscal year: During FY 98, the District continued with the preparation of plans and specifications for the project. In October 1997, a Project Cooperation Agreement was executed with the City of Pittsburgh. In June 1998, the District executed a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) for the purpose of allowing the District to acquire the real estate and complete relocation work on behalf of the city. With the MOA executed and the funds for this effort transferred to the District in July 1998, real estate mapping was initiated. 12. SOUTH CENTRAL, PA ENVIRONMENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Location. Projects under this program in the Pittsburgh District are located in the South Central, PA counties of Armstrong, Cambria, Clearfield, Fayette, Indiana, Somerset and Westmoreland. Projects currently identi- 18-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1998 fled consists of the Forest Hills Municipal Authority Wastewater Treatment project, located at the confluence of the Little Conemaugh and South Fork Rivers and the Burrell Township Sanitary Authority Sanitary Sewer project, located on the Conemaugh River, 14 miles upstream from Saltsburg where the Conemaugh River and Loyalhanna Creek join to form the Kiskiminetas River. Existing Project. The proposed project was authorized under Section 313 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992. Section 313 authorizes the Secretary of the Army to establish a pilot program to provide design and construction assistance to non-Federal interests in south central Pennsylvania. The Forest Hills Municipal Authority (FHMA) was identified by Congress as a non- Federal interest to receive high priority under the program. The Forest Hills project consists of the fast track planning, design and construction of a wastewater treatment plan, pump stations, interceptor lines and collection systems. The treatment system will provide service to four boroughs and five townships that currently are not serviced. Total project cost is estimated at $40,000,000 ($8,150,000 Federal cost; $31,850,000 non- Federal cost). The second project identified for participation under this program is the Burrell Township Sanitary Authority project consisting of the installation of gravity sanitary sewers and pump stations. Total project costs are estimated to be $4,700,000 ($1,750,000 Federal cost; $2,950,000 non-Federal cost). Other projects identified for participation under this program are Blacklick Valley Municipal Authority, potable water transmission and distribution lines; Redstone Township Sewer Authority, design of a wastewater treatment plant and conveyence system; Westmoreland Distribution Center, waterline and sanitary sewer extensions; and White Township, Wastewater Treatment Plant and Interceptor Sewer. Additional projects identified for FY 98 funding included East Huntingdon Township; Ironbridge Sanitary Sewer Project; Somerset County, Infrastructure Upgrade Project; and Westmoreland Business and Research Park. Local Cooperation. Legislation requires the project to be cost shared at 75% Federal funds and 25% non- Federal funds. Project Cooperation Agreements between the Corps of Engineers and the Non-Federal Sponsors. Sanitary Authority are required prior to design and construction efforts. Operation and maintenance of the project will be at 100% non-Federal cost. Operations during fiscal year. The District completed NEPA compliance and submitted the construction PCA to Headquarters for the Forest Hills Municipal Authority Project. A construction PCA was also submitted to Headquarters for the Burrell Township Sanitary Authority Project. Design PCA's for the following projects were executed: White Township, East Huntingdon, Somerset County, and Westmoreland Business and Research Park. Designs for the efforts are all underway and are between 25% and 75% complete. Construction PCA's for the following projects will be submitted in FY 99: Westmoreland Distribution Center, Blacklick Valley, East Huntingdon Township, Somerset County, and Westmoreland Business and Research Park. 13. TURTLE CREEK, PA Location. In Allegheny and Westmoreland Counties, adjacent to Pittsburgh, PA, along lower reaches of Turtle Creek and Thompson Run, a tributary of Turtle Creek. (See Geological Survey Chart for Pittsburgh, PA). Existing project. The existing channel improvement project was constructed during the period 1962-1967 and provided for flood protection by widening, deepening, and streamlining channel of lower Turtle Creek for about 6.3 miles and channel of Thompson Run for about 1 mile above its mouth. Appurtenant work consists of channel streambed and side slope protection where required, retaining walls, drop structures, floodgates, alteration, removal or reconstruction of restrictive structures and adjustments of affected utilities. Project was designed to accommodate a design flood corresponding to an estimated 100 year frequency. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. Federal cost for completed project was $15,350,000; non-Federal cost was $1,840,000. The Fiscal Year 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act specified that the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, is authorized and directed to repair and restore the Turtle Creek, Pennsylvania, local protection project. Estimated Federal cost for repair and restoration work is $7,185,000; non-federal cost is $2,415,000. Local Cooperation. The Turtle Creek Flood Control Authority was the local sponsor for the existing project. However, they were not financially able to sponsor the project restoration, nor to subsequently perform any required project maintenance. Allegheny County is the local sponsor for the project rehabilitation and all other requirements for local cooperation for the future maintenance of the project. A local cooperation agreement was executed with the county on August 4, 1992. Operations during fiscal year. New work. The project consists of debris and sediment removal from the Turtle Creek and Thompson Run channels and debris basin; clearing trees and brush from channel side slopes, restoration of channel side slopes, repairs to concrete retaining walls, debris dams, trashracks, spalled concrete joints and drainage appurtenances; and removal of vegetative growth from weepholes. In December 1996 the repair and rehabilitation of the project was completed. The completed project was then turned over to Allegheny County for operation and maintenance in January 1997. Total estimated flood damages prevented by the project through FY 98 were $84,364,000. 14. WEST VIRGINIA AND PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD CONTROL Location. Project under this program in the Pittsburgh District are located in the Tygart River Basin in West Virginia and the lower Allegheny River in Pennsylvania. The priority (named in the legislation) communities located in West Virginia are Phillipi and Belington. The priority communities in Pennsylvania are New Bethlehem, Clymer, Benson, Hooversville, Meyersdale, Connellsville and Dubois. Section 581 of the Water Re- 18-6 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT sources Development Act of 1996 authorizes the Secretary of the Army to design and construct flood control measures for these priority communities at a level of protection sufficient to prevent future losses from flooding equivalent to that which occurred in January 1996, but at least no less than a 100 year level of protection. Project development will consist of developing a least cost plan including structural and/or non-structural elements, to provide the authorized level of protection without guard to a benefit/cost ratio. Local Cooperation. The reconnaisance phase is 100% Federally funded. The Detailed Project Report, Plans and Specifications and Construction phases are cost shared at 65% Federal funds and 35% non-Federal funds. A Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement (FCSA) is required to design efforts and a Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) is required prior to project construction. In September 1998, Director of Civil Works, HQUSACE, approved the District's request for a waiver of the up front cost sharing for the design portion of the West Virginia projects. The basis for the approval of the waiver was that the priority communities in West Virginia qualified for a reduced cost share (5%) based on the ability to pay provisions of Section 103(m) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Operation during fiscal year. In Pennsylvania, a General Management Plan (GMP) is being prepared to describe the scope of the overall program, the proposed procedures for developing detailed decision and project designs. A reconnaisance level least cost plan will be developed for each of the communities in Pennsylvania. The GMP will be completed in January 1999. A justification document for the request for the waiver of the up front cost sharing for the communities in West Virginia was prepared and submitted to HQUSACE in January 1998. Project Study Plans (PSPs) for each of the two communities in West Virginia were completed in September 1998. Flood Control - Reservoirs 15. BERLIN LAKE, OH Location. Dam is on Mahoning River about 73 miles above its confluence with Shenango River. It is about 10 miles above existing Milton Reservoir Dam and 35 miles upstream from Warren, Ohio. Reservoir is in Portage, Mahoning and Stark Counties, OH. (See Geological Survey charts for Warren, Ravenna, and Alliance, OH.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and water supply. Dam consists of a partially controlled, concrete gravity, center spillway flanked by rolled-earthfill abutment sections joining valley sides. Authorized project is complete and in operation for flood control and low water regulation purposes in industrialized Mahoning Valley below. Construction of dam was started in January 1942 and completed in June 1943. Present project lands consists of 6,885.3 acres in fee and 1,098.7 acres in easements. For further project description, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1233. Local cooperation. None required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated as required and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. A contract for Service Bridge Concrete Repairs in the amount of $210,000 was accomplished in FY 97. A contract for Construction of New Bridge Service in the amount of $2,985,994 was started in FY 98 and will continue into FY 99.Estimated flood control benefits achieved in FY 98 were $37,652,000; total benefits through September 1998, revised to reflect damages prevented in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District, were $466,993,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 16. CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on Conemaugh River in Indiana and Westmoreland Counties, PA, 7.5 miles above junction of Conemaugh River and Loyalhanna Creek, which form the head of the Kiskiminetas River. It is about 2 miles northeast of Tunnelton, PA, and about 42 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Westmoreland and Indiana Counties, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Latrobe, New Florence, and Elders Ridge, PA.) Existing Project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides and an earth embankment ending in right abutment. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir system is designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Present project lands consist of 7608.7 acres in fee and 522.8 acres in easements. Project authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1217. Local cooperation. None required by law. Licenses. A non-Federal hydropower project utilizing Conemaugh Lake was constructed downstream of the dam under FERC Licenses 3207. The 15-megawatt project began commercial operation on February 6, 1989. It is owned by National Renewable Resources, Inc. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. A contract for Retention Dike-Bow Ridge Disposal Site in the amount of $791,075 was accomplished in FY 97. A contract for Dredging in the amount of $1,395,900 was accomplished in FY 98. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for FY 98 were $29,886,000; total flood control benefits through September 1998, revised to reflect damages prevented in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District, were $1,507,641,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public use facilities were continued. 18-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1998 17. CROOKED CREEK LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on Crooked Creek 6.7 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River near Ford City, PA, and about 32 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Freeport and Elders Ridge, PA.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earth-fill type with separate uncontrolled saddle spillway and tunnel outlet works. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in March 1938 and completed in October 1940. Present project lands consist of 2,561.7 acres in fee and 100.22 acres in easements. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1213. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for FY 98 were $5,163,000; total benefits achieved through September 1998, revised to reflect damages prevented in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District, were estimated at $277,956,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 18. EAST BRANCH, CLARION RIVER LAKE, PA Location. Dam is in Elk County, PA on East Branch of Clarion River above Middle Fork, 7.3 miles above junction of East and West branches of Clarion River at Johnsonburg, PA, and about 105 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Elk County, PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Mount Jewett, PA.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and low-water regulation. Dam is rolled-earthfill type with gate-controlled concrete tunnel under right abutment and a paved uncontrolled spillway on left abutment slope. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for low-water regulation purposes in Clarion River Valley below and for flood control as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for protection of Pittsburgh and upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in June 1947 and completed in July 1952. Present project lands consist of 287.2 acres in fee and 1,296.7 acres in easements. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in Flood Control Acts of 1938 and 1944. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1206. Local Cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for flood control and low-water regulation, as required; and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir through September 30, 1998 revised to include damages prevented in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District were $71,408,000. Some reservoir management activity was performed throughout the year comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation of public-use facilities. Work was limited in scope as bulk of reservoir lands are owned by Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 19. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, PA AND NY Location. Dam site is on Allegheny River 9 miles above Warren, PA, and 198 miles above mouth of river at Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Warren and McKean Counties, PA., and Cattaraugus County, NY. (See Geological Survey Charts for Warren and Kinzua, PA-NY, and Randolph and Salamanca, NY.) Existing project. Reservoir provides flood control, low water regulation, and recreation. Dam consists of a combination concrete gravity structure and rolled earth embankment with gate-controlled spillway and discharge conduits controlled by slide-gates in gravity section. Construction of project, initiated in February 1960, is complete. Construction of dam was started in September 1960 and completed in December 1965. Development of recreation area at Onoville under a cost-sharing agreement with Cattaragus County was completed in June 1978. Present project lands consist of 2,646 acres in fee and easements over 22,420.0 acres. For further details see Annual Report for 1962, page 1202. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936, 1938 and 1941. Local cooperation. None required by law. Licenses. The Federal Power Commission granted a license to Pennsylvania Electric Company and Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company on December 28, 1965, for the joint construction, operation and maintenance of a 325-megawatt pumped-storage installation (FPC Project No. 2280). The project is complete. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low water regulation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. A contract for Boat Launching Improvement in the amount of $171,014 was accomplished in FY 97.Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir through September 30, 1998, revised to include damages prevented in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District, were $906,659,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 20. LOWER GIRARD DAM, OH Location. Lower Girard Lake(formerly called Liberty Lake)is located in the northeast section of Ohio in Trumbull County in the City of Girard which lies just northwest of the City of Youngstown, Ohio. Lower Girard Lake Dam is located on Squaw Creek approximately 5,000 feet downstream of Girard Lake and approximately 2 miles upstream from Squaw Creek's confluence with the Mahoning River. 18-8 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT Existing Project. Lower Girard Lake together with Girard Lake, located immediately upstream, is a system of water supply reservoirs that was constructed in 1917 and operated by the Ohio Water Service Company to provide process water to local steel mills and industry. The Lower and Upper Girard Dams were purchased by the City of Girard from the Consumer Ohio Water Company in 1995. The dam is an Ambersen type buttress dam. It has been determined that the dam requires rehabilitation to meet modern dam safety standards. Local Cooperation. The City of Girard, Ohio is the non-Federal sponsor for this project. The City owns the dam and the lake impounded by it. Cost-sharing for this project will be 75% Federal and 25% by the City. Operations during the fiscal year. In WRDA 1998 Congressman Trafficant added $2.1 million for the Corps to investigate the safety of, and rehabilitate the Lower Girard Dam. In July 1998 a Design Agreement was executed between the Corps and the City. Currently a special report is being completed which will recommend a rehabilitation plan to bring the dam up to present safety standards. The report is expected to be completed in August 1999. 21. LOYALHANNA LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on Loyalhanna Creek, 4.5 miles above junction of creek with Conemaugh River at Saltsburg, PA, and about 29 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Westmoreland County PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Latrobe, PA). Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides, and an earth embankment section ending in left abutment. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in October 1939 and completed in June 1942. Present project lands consist of 3,330.8 acres in fee and easements over 86.7 acres. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1219. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for FY 98 were $4,987,000; total benefits through September 1998, revised to reflect damages prevented in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District, were $315,554,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 22. MAHONING CREEK LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on Mahoning Creek in Armstrong County, PA, 22.9 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River. It is about 6.50 miles southeast of New Bethlehem, PA, and about 51 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Armstrong, Indiana, and Jefferson Counties, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Rural Valley and Smicksburg, PA). Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam started in February 1939 and was completed in June 1941. Present project lands consist of 2,519.36 acres in fee and easements over 83.5 acres. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1210. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Contracts for Concrete Repairs on Dam, in the amount of $1,222,531, and Rehab Electrical System, Hydro Pumps, Low Flow Valves, in the amount of $1,400,311, were accomplished in FY 97/98. Estimated flood damages prevented by this project for FY 98 were $7,710,000; total benefits through September 30, 1998, revised to reflect damages prevented in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District, were $414,767,000. Activities under reservoir management and maintenance for public-use facilities continued. 23. MICHAEL J. KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH Location. Dam site is on West Branch of Mahoning River which joins Mahoning River at Newton Falls, OH. It is 11 miles above mouth of branch and about 15 miles upstream from Warren, OH. Reservoir is in Portage County, OH. (See Geological Survey Charts for Ravenna, Garrettsville, Chagrin Falls, and Kent, OH.) Existing project. Reservoir provides flood control, low-water regulation and recreation. Dam consists of a rolled-earth embankment structure with gate-controlled outlet works and an uncontrolled side-hill spillway through left abutment. Authorized project is completed and in operation for flood control and low water regulation purposes. Present project lands consist of 6,298.9 acres fee and easements over 27.9 acres. For further description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1231 (West Branch Reservoir, Mahoning River, Ohio). Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 191, 85th Cong. 1st sess.), with local contribution requirements modified by Flood Control Act of 1960. Federal costs of completed project is $17,370,000. Local interests contributed $3,230,000 during period of construction bringing initial project cost to $20,600,000. The State of Ohio has a lease from the Secretary of the Army for development and operation of recreation facilities in the reservoir area. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute $5,200,000 for water pollution abatement and for municipal and industrial water supply purposes, of which 18-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1998 $3,230,000 was paid in cash during construction. Unpaid balance at time project is placed in operation, $1,970,000, will be paid in cash at that time or on an annual basis. Of the unpaid balance of contributed funds due and payable, payment in full of Trumbull County's share in the amount of $663,040 has been received. Mahoning County elected to pay their share ($1,306,960) in 50 annual installments of $50,323.32, including interest. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. A contract for the Pavement of Rehab Dam Area Roads in the amount of $106,065 was accomplished in FY 98. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this project for this FY 98 were $10,322,000. Total benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1998 were $165,315,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. This work was limited in scope as state of Ohio has jurisdiction over most of the recreation in reservoir area. 24. MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OH Location. Dam is on Mosquito Creek, 12.6 miles above junction of creek with Mahoning River at Niles, OH, and about 18 miles northwest of Youngstown, OH. (See Geological Survey Charts for Bristolville and Kinsman, OH, and Pennsylvania.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control, lowwater regulation and water supply storage. Dam is rolled-earthfill type with outlet facilities through dam, and an uncontrolled natural wasteway to discharge overflow from reservoir. Authorized project is complete and in operation for flood control and low-water regulation purposes in industrialized Mahoning and Beaver Valleys below. Construction of dam was started in July 1943 and was ready for beneficial use in January 1944. Present project lands consist of 11,180.4 acres in fees and easements over 276.0 acres. State of Ohio has a license from Secretary of the Army for development and operation of recreation facilities in reservoir area. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1228. Local cooperation. None required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow regulation as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this project for this fiscal year were $8,372,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1998 were $115,751,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of certain public-use facilities continued. This work was limited in scope as State of Ohio has jurisdiction over most of the recreation in reservoir area. 25. OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT) Location. A series of dikes, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs/lakes in Ohio River Basin within Pittsburgh District. Existing project. Individual projects considered in comprehensive plan within Pittsburgh District. (See Tables 18-B, 18-E and 18-K on Acts authorizing existing projects, local protection projects and reservoirs.) Operations during fiscal year. New work: None by the United States except as stated in individual projects. Completed local protection projects operated and maintained by local interests, including those projects for which individual reports have been included. 26. SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, PA AND OH Location. Dam is on Shenango River about 0.8 mile above Sharpsville, PA, and about 33 miles above junction of river with Mahoning River, which unite near New Castle, PA, to form Beaver River. Reservoir is in Mercer County, PA and Trumbull County, Ohio. (See Geological Survey Chart for Kinsman, Ohio, and Shenango, PA.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control, lowflow augmentation and recreation. Dam consists of a concrete gravity structure with gate-controlled outlet works and an uncontrolled center spillway section. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for lowwater regulation purposes in Shenango River valley below and for flood control as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for protection of Shenango River valley and the Beaver and upper Ohio River Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in March 1963 and completed in May 1965. Present project lands consists of 14,485.94 acres in fee and easements over 198 acres. Approximately 65.94 acres in abandoned railroad right-ofway were acquired for project use. Future work consists of completion of project lands of any additional recreation facilities as required to serve the public needs. For further project description, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1230. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Contracts were completed for Construction of Additional Parking/Pull-off areas in the amount of $101,884 and Bank Protection, Recreation Area in the amount of $226,590. Estimated flood control benefits achieved through September 30, 1998, revised to reflect damages prevented in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District, were $97,710,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance continued. 18-10 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT 27. STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV Location. In Lewis County, North Central West Virginia, on the West Fork River, which joins the Tygart River at Fairmont, West Virginia to form the Monongahela River. Damsite is located at Brownsville, West Virginia, about 4 miles south of Weston and 72 miles above mouth of West Fork River at Fairmont, WV. (See Geological Survey Charts for Weston and Crawford, WV.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, area redevelopment and recreation. Dam is concrete gravity type, 95 feet high and 620 feet long. Outlet works consist of five multi-level sluices, spillway is uncontrolled. Storage capacity is 74,650 acre-feet controlling an area of 102 square miles.A station hydropower plant completed in 1995 supplies power to the dam and administration building, with excess power being sold to an electric utility company. Project was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act. Estimated initial Federal cost for new work (1991) is $231,000,000 (includes an estimated $24,900,000 reimbursement by non-Federal interests.) Present project lands consist of 20,451 acres in fee and easements over 398 acres. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to make arrangements for repayment, under the provisions of the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, of that part of the construction cost and annual operation, maintenance and replacement costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, an amount presently estimated at $4,350,000 for construction; and $15,000 annually for operations, maintenance and replacements. Also, in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act, local interests are required to administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement, pay, contribute in kind or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first costs of the reservoir project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement, an amount presently estimated at $24,810,000, bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife land and facilities, the amount involved being currently estimated on an average annual basis to be $457,000, exercise to the full extent of their legal capability, control against removal of streamflow made available for water quality control; and contribute to the control of pollution of streams subject to low-flow augmentation by adequate treatment or other methods of controlling wastes at their source. The requirements of Section 221 were amended in 1971 to exempt assurances for future demands for water supply pursuant to the Water Supply Act of 1958 from the contractual requirements of the Act. Accordingly, the city of Weston, West Virginia, has provided assurances that it will enter into a water supply contract with the Department of the Army within a period of time which will permit paying out the costs allocated to the water supply storage within the life of the project. A recreation cost-sharing contract, in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act, P.L. 89-72, was executed by the State of West Virginia on March 27, 1977. Local cooperation assurances for recreation cost-sharing were executed by the Governor and Attorney General of West Virginia on May 29, 1973. In this connection, Section 8 of P.L. 92-222 deleted the requirement that the State of West Virginia "hold and save the United States free from damages resulting from water rights claims due to construction and operation of the project." Legislation relieving Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV, project of the requirements of Section 221, P.L. 96-611 was contained in Water Resources Development Act of 1974 signed by the President on March 7, 1974. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The Corps is working with the State of WV to revise the Master Plan to incorporate higher revenue producing recreation facilities, including a lodge, golf course, cabins and camping. The revised Master Plan was approved by the Corps in June 1992, but with the stipulation that a costsharing contract amendment must be executed prior to the award of a construction contract for the granting of any cost-sharing credits. The FY 1992 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act allows the State costsharing credits for all of these facilities except the golf course. In March, 1994, the State and the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works ASA(CW) executed an amendment to the 1977 Stonewall Jackson Lake Recreation Cost-Sharing Contract to reflect these credits. The State of West Virginia now must design and build the approved remaining recreation facilities within ten years of the executed amendment, or March 2004, in accordance with the timeframes and conditions set forth in the amended contract. The WV State Supreme Court has ruled that the sale of $6 million in revenue bonds for the design and construction of the lodge, additional camping and golf course may not proceed. In 1996, the State issued a solicitation for interest and qualifications to create a public/private joint venture for the purpose of developing recreational facilities at Stonewall Jackson Lake Park. In October 1997, the State selected a private firm to design and build the remaining recreational facilities. Section 508 of the FY 1998 Energy and Water Appropriations Act provides for cost sharing credits for this public/private development against the current $21.5 million owed to the government by the State of WV. Estimated flood control benefits achieved for this project for FY 98 were $1,667,000; total flood control benefits through September 30, 1998, revised to include downstream districts, were $87,191,000. 28. TIONESTA LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on Tionesta Creek, 1.25 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River at Tionesta, PA, and about 78 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is entirely in Forest County, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Tionesta, Tidioute and Sheffield, PA.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earthfill type with separate uncontrolled saddle spillway and tunnel outlet works. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in May 1938 and completed in January 1941. Present project lands consists of 2,794.77 acres in fee and easement over 13.1 acres. Ap- 18-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1998 proximately 2.53 acres of fee were disposed at the project. Future work consists of provision on project lands of additional recreational facilities as required to serve public needs. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1203. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Contracts were completed for Paint Service Bridge and Install Fuel Line in the amount of $225,350 and Maintenance of Bulkhead System in the amount of $176,063. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this project through September 30, 1998, revised to include downstream districts, were $399,975,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 29. UNION CITY DAM, PA Location. In Erie County, northwestern Pennsylvania, on French Creek, a tributary of Allegheny River. Damsite is 24 miles upstream from Cambridge Springs, PA, and 41 miles upstream from Meadville, PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Union City, PA - NY.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earth embankment non-gated type with uncontrolled side-channel spillway. Outlet works consist of a lower outlet located in valley floor constructed of reinforced concrete conduit 8 feet by 4.5 feet and an upper outlet consisting of an uncontrolled slot 9.5 feet wide through the north end of the ogee weir in the spillway. Dam is 1,420 feet long at top rising 88 feet above streambed and provides gross capacity of 47,640 acre-feet from a drainage area of 222 square miles. Project authorization was modified to provide for a conservation pool and addition of recreation facilities. On November 5, 1974, a referendum proposal was defeated by the constituents of Erie County in regard to the cost-sharing for construction of recreation facilities. In view of the foregoing, all action toward implementation of the authorized project modification was discontinued. Reservoir is operated as one of a two-reservoir system for reduction of flood stages in French Creek Basin between damsite and mouth, Allegheny River from Franklin, PA, to Pittsburgh, PA, inclusive, and upper Ohio River Valley. Initial highway relocations were completed in October 1968 and remaining highway relocations were completed in May 1972. Construction of the dam was started in July 1968 and completed in September 1971. Present project lands consist of 161.4 acres in fee and easements over 2,410.29 acres. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to inform affected interests in French Creek Basin at least annually, that the system of reservoirs of which Union City Dam is a part, will not provide protection against maximum floods. On November 10, 1964 the Department of Forests and Waters of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania furnished formal assurances of local cooperation in respect to notifying local interests at least annually that the system of reservoirs will not provide protection against maximum floods. A referendum on the ballot during the November 1974 election regarding the approval to cost-share the maintenance of a summer pool was defeated by the local voters. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Maintenance of the structure and appurtenances was performed as required. This dam acted as an uncontrolled detention type dam during the fiscal year. Estimated flood control benefits achieved for this project for FY 98 were $6,995,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1998, revised to include downstream districts, were $44,326,000. 30. WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA Location. In Crawford County, northwestern Pennsylvania, on Woodcock Creek, a tributary of French Creek. Damsite is about 4.1 miles above mouth of Woodcock Creek and about 5 miles northeast of Meadville, PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Meadville, PA.) Existing project. A flood-control reservoir dam of rolled-earth embankment type, gate-controlled outlet works with a 6 foot-wide by 7.75 foot-high conduit and uncontrolled saddle spillway on the left abutment. Dam is 4,650 feet long at top rising 90 feet above streambed and provides for gross capacity of 20,000 acre-feet from a drainage area of 46 square miles. Reservoir is operated as one of a two-reservoir system for reduction of flood stages in French Creek Basin between damsite and mouth. Allegheny River from Franklin, PA, to Pittsburgh, PA, inclusive, and upper Ohio River Valley. Authorized project is complete. Construction of dam was started in July 1970 and completed in July 1973. Land acquired for project consists of 1,731.5 acres in fee and easements over .56 acres. Project was authorized for flood control and recreation by 1962 Flood Control Act. Storage for water quality control was added to the project during the preconstruction planning stage. Local cooperation. Local interests must inform affected interests in French Creek Basin at least annually, in a manner satisfactory to District Engineer, that a system of reservoirs of which Woodcock Creek is a part, will not provide protection against maximum floods. Pennsylvania Department of Forests and Waters assumed responsibility of local cooperation for project. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Maintenance of the structure and appurtenances was performed as required. A contract for Sanitary Sewer Line Renovation in the amount of $269,809 was completed in FY 97. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this project for FY 98 were $2,623,000. Total flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir through September 30, 1998, revised to include downstream districts, were $24,666,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public use facilities continued. 18-12 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT 31. YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, PA AND MD Location. Dam is on Youghiogheny River about 74.2 miles above its junction with Monongahela River at McKeesport, PA. It is 1.2 miles upstream from Confluence, PA, and about 57 miles southeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Fayette and Somerset Counties, PA, and Garrett County, MD. (See Geological Survey Charts for Confluence, PA, Accident, MD, West Virginia and Pennsylvania.) Existing project. Reservoir for flood control, lowflow augmentation, and pollution abatement purposes. Dam is rolled-earthfill type with separate uncontrolled side channel spillway and tunnel outlet works. Authorized project is complete. For flood control, reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in June 1940 and completed in May 1944. Present project lands consist of 3,914.9 acres in fee and easements over 0.62 acre. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1223. Local cooperation. None required. Licenses. A non-Federal hydropower project utilizing releases from Youghiogheny River Lake was constructed in accordance with FERC License 3623. D/R Hydro Company is the authorized representative of the Licensee, Youghiogheny Hydroelectric Authority, and is responsible for operation of the plant. It has a 10- megawatt capacity. The plant began commercial operation on December 7, 1989. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Contracts for Construct Campground and Bicycle Trail, in the amount of $181,142, will be accomplished in FY 99. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for FY 98 were $11,761,000. Total flood control benefits achieved by this project through September 30, 1998 revised to include damages prevented in downstream districts, were $396,762,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public use facilities continued. 32. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within boundaries of their respective districts. Inspecmaintain these projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. (See Table 18-L for dates of inspections.) Costs for this fiscal year, $107,264. Total cost to September 30, 1998 was $1,987,762. 33. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 18-E on other authorized flood control projects. 34. FLOOD CONTROL WORKS UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION For flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) See Table 18-M. For emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) See Table 18-M. Flood control and coastal emergencies (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Corps Statutory Authorities Activities in Support of Others Facilities Inspections Emergency Operations Rehabilitation Total Cost for Fiscal Year General Investigations 35. SURVEYS Navigation Studies Flood Damage Prevention Studies Special Studies Special Investigations FERC Licensing Activities Interagency Water Resources Development Coordination Studies with Other Agencies Review of Completed Project Total Cost for Fiscal Year $ 189,904 101,425 44,575 568 141,386 516,853 $994,711 $1,860,658 18,042 504,123 60,681 30,342 34,154 8,403 35,037 $2,551,440 36. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs this fiscal year were $134,073 for flood plain management services and $7,427 for related hydrologic studies. 37. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Beaver River, PA Chartiers Creek, PA Saw Mill Run, Pittsburgh, PA Mon River, WV (4 sites) Total Cost for Fiscal Year $19,235 8,200 4,979 194,106 $226,520 tions were made of completed units transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation and local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to 18-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1998 38. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 40. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM None. RESTORATION 39. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR Coordination Acct Funds $4,231 Preliminary Restoration Plans 15,70 IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT Total Cost for Fiscal Year $19,301 Pleasant Crk, Wetland, Tygart River Lake $7,649 Coordination Acct Funds 2,945 Initial Appraisals, General 1,262 Total Cost for Fiscal Year $11,856 18-14 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 18-A COS See Section In Text Project Navigation - Locks and Dams 1. Allegheny River PA 3. Monongahela River, PA and WV 5. Tygart Lake, WV Flood Control - Local Protection 7. Chartiers Creek, PA 8. Elkins, WV 9. Johnstown, PA 10. Punxsutawney, Ohio River Basin, PA 11. Saw Mill Run, PA 12. South Central, PA Environment Improvement Program 13. Turtle Creek, PA 14. WV & PA Flood Control, WV & PA Flood Control - Reservoirs 15. Berlin Lake Ohio River Basin, OH T AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Sept. 30, Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 1998 1998 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. New Work Approp. Cost 13,119,000 13,643,805 19,107,000 27,833,368 12,502,000 2,855,234 12,616,400 12,646,949 13,569,300 16,734,875 14,791,600 14,015,073 - 462,000 - 218,374 918,000 1,468,000 1,303,153 1,548,947 1,146 27 7,239,820 6,921,132 16,525,000 13,881,611 12,680,000 13,086,392 775,000 946,251 953,090 837,734 283 7,000 (10,000) 31,971 2,298 477,000 438,477 1,070,000 994,725 200,000 67,494 3,585,000 442,182 2,331,000 622,426 548,000 424,136 1,110,000 1,239,223 1 46 11,000 1,579 7,000 183,589 1,857,000 1,770,774 72,000 14,000 156,946 75,019 - 500,000 - 69,322 ,950,000 3,500,000 783,406 1,183,075 ,501,000 265,000 ,882,554 472,866 - 18,157,8601 - 18,157,860 6,448,000 161,968,7432 6,536,467 161,666,862 13,202,000 450,528,8354 16,327,949 451,726,598 14,044,000 299,986,8575 14,273,266 299,564,406 6 - 15,857,000 - 15,857,000 614,000 20,928,9327 550,474 20,793,0317 1,315,000 20,426,5418 1,072,824 20,056,221 89,000 88,999 2] 2( 5,9k 5,4: 2! 10,0( 1,3E (5 2,1( 2 - 30,818,15341 - 30,818,153 - 1,772,627 - 1,772,627 1,000 371,192 8,582 367,999 - 8,865,3889 - 8,865,388 12,000 7,132,190 08,015 7,128,258 82,000 13,801,00043 25,479 13,130,376 - 3,586,10710 - 3,586,107 13,000 1,665,59711 6,801 1,658,763 20,000 520,000 93,645 362,967 00,000 24,035,00042 67,763 4,024,623 42 4,553) 26,680,79938 2,569 26,680,799 00,000 2,100,000 32,832 232,832 - 8,739,98712 - 8,739,987 18-15 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Cost to Section Sept. 30, In Text Project 16. Conemaugh River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 17. Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 18. East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 19. Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, PA and NY 20. Lower Girard Dam, OH 21.. Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 22. Mahoning Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 23. Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, OH 24. Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH 25. Ohio River Basin Pittsburgh, PA District Consolidated Funding Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost FY95 FY96 FY97 1998 1998 1,834,000 1,942,000 2,539,790 3,372,000 37,176,70513 1,641,919 1,993,851 1,936,936 4,053,379 37,074,113 - - - - 46,012,41114 - - - - 46,012,4111 1,155,000 1,454,000 3,522,910 1,633,000 23,012,88639 1,154,657 1,433,107 2,924,592 2,136,743 22,874,936 - - - - 4,482,93315 - - - - 4,482,933 1,783,000 1,441,000 1,454,300 1,542,759 31,428,61716 1,362,632 1,465,523 1,325,143 1,605,591 31,341,750 - - - 9,539,58617 - - - - 9,539,586 908,000 1,201,000 1,081,740 897,943 1,041,798 1,225,242 898,000 18,471,72418 922,310 18,440,544 - - - - 109,305,07619 - - - - 109,305,07619 1,531,000 1,354,000 1,267,860 1,334,954 30,305,75739 1,407,143 1,504,653 1,240,737 1,336,783 30,249,43439 - - - - 2,921,000 - - - - 2,921,000 - - - 309,000 309,000 - - - 80,552 80,552 - - - - 5,727,53120 - - - - 5,727,531 1,039,900 1,465,000 1,195,260 1,099,000 23,032,55321 1,078,660 1,032,286 1,618,063 1,102,203 22,990,836 - - - - 7,144,97322 - - - - 7,144,973 833,000 1,189,000 1,929,100 2,802,000 20,340,06240 9850,031 1,106,784 1,146,859 3,413,337 20,067,43040 - - - - 47,033 - - - - 47,033 - - - - 17,376,09724 - - - - 17,376,097 803,000 868,000 770,280 887,000 16,284,51425 932,871 908,438 732,529 869,061 16,212,093 - - - 4,253,02926 - - - - 4,253,029 785,000 1,016,000 848,330 1,031,000 17,497,90145 778,965 942,077 884,890 1,003,425 17,395,17445 - - - - 985,19727 - - - - 985,197 2 7 18-16 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 18-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Cost to Section Sept. 30, In Text Project Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 1998 1998 26. Shenango River New Work Lake, Ohio River Approp. - - - - 40,217,20128 Basin, PA Cost - - - - 40,217,20128 Maint. Approp. 2,191,000 2,494,000 2,329,210 2,078,000 42,122,55729 Cost 2,194,229 2,391,386 2,523,289 1,987,107 41,966,96029 27. Stonewall Jackson New Work Lake, Ohio Approp. 122,800 250,000 0 61,307 211,374,741 River Basin, WV Cost 185,468 847,092 69,348 94,530 211,339,623 Maint. Approp. 877,000 962,000 994,230 921,000 9,347,043 Cost 883,849 932,752 870,392 1,048,722 9,310,214 26. Tionesta Lake, New Work Ohio River Approp. - - - - 7,792,37830 Basin, PA Cost - - - - 7,792,37831 Maint. Approp. 1,708,000 1,701,000 1,392,470 1,615,000 27,276,49832 Cost 1,776,999 1,693,847 1,402,835 1,530,343 27,150,91732 27. Union City New Work Dam, Ohio Approp. - - - - 14,559,800 River Basin, PA Cost - - - - 14,559,800 Maint. Approp. 382,000 226,000 222,030 272,000 6,342,698 Cost 354,424 283,192 219,336 6,053,324 277,942 6,331,266 28. Woodcock Creek New Work Lake, Ohio. Approp. - - - - 20,545,06533 River Basin, PA Cost - - - - 20,545,06534 Maint. Approp. 911,000 977,000 978,810 842,000 14,674,96735 Cost 826,851 976,013 1,062,680 841,392 14,642,69435 29. Youghiogheny New Work River Lake Approp. - - - - 12,521,16736 Ohio River Cost - - - - 12,521,16736 Basin, PA and Maint. MD Approp. 1,691,000 2,041,300 1,699,770 2,043,937 37,741,17037 Cost 1,690,894 1,873,903 1,840,191 1,813,962 37,439,47837 1. Includes $2,453,737 from emergency relief funds and $1,250,049 from public works funds. 2. Includes $64,365 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963) and $191,400 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes $995,000 appropriated and expended for major maintenance at L/D's 2, 3 and 4. 3. Includes amounts appropriated to date for; Point Marion, L&D 8, PA - $56,264,400 for CG, $56,550,000 for IWTF, $3,322,057 for raising crest of dam in 1958-9, $2,086,438 for original reconstruction years 1923-26 and $618,758 for AE&D (Total $118,841,653). Grays Landing, L&D 7, PA - $86,607,200 for CG, $83,584,000 for IWTF, and $803,000 AE&D (Total $170,994,000). L&D 2, 3 & 4 - $14,354,700 for CG and $27,077,000 for IWTF (Total $41,431,700). 4. Includes amounts expended to date on; Point Marion, L&D 8, PA - $56,119,588 for CG, $56,389,478 for IWTF, $3,322,057 for raising crest of dam in 1958-9, $2,086,438 for original construction years 1923-26 and $618,758 for AE&D (Total $118,536,319). Grays Landing, L&D 7, PA - $86,332,561 for CG, $87,102,965 for IWTF, and $803,000 AE&D (Total $174,238,520). L&D 2, 3 & 4 - $23,825,019 for CG, $25,865,456 for IWTF (Total $255,690,470). 5. Includes $22,549 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963), $742 for maintenance for previous project and $582,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 6. Includes $22,549 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963), $742 for maintenance for previous project and $464,508 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 7. Includes $1,999,995 emergency relief funds, $10,000,000 public work funds, $234,000 Code 711 funds and $412,088 Code 713 funds, $462,000 appropriated to and $218,374 expended on the Dam Safety Assurance Program - CG; excludes $409,622 contributed by local interest. 8. Includes $89,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations, Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes $425,000 appropriated to and $424,493 expended on the Dam Safety Assurance Program O&M. 9. Includes $33,423 from emergency relief funds. 10. Excludes $180,485 for new work expended from contributed funds. 11. Includes $283,988 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 12. Includes $1,542,500 Code 711 funds, $809,700 Code 712 funds and $99,111 Code 713 funds; excludes $100,000 contributed by local interest. 13. Includes $40,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Includes $703,407 expended to date on M&O of dams. 14. Includes $5,351 from emergency relief funds and $328,000 Code 711 funds. 18-17 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) 15. Includes $63,788 from emergency relief funds. Also includes $278,044 Code 711 funds. 16. Includes $45,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Includes $697,646 expended to date on M&O of dams. 17. Includes $156,812 Code 711 funds. 18. Includes $322,000 provided from the Protective Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes $6,795 appropriated to and expended to date on M&O of dams. 19. Includes $2,791 from emergency relief funds, $14,622 Code 711 funds and $568,265 Code 713 funds; excludes $389,370 contributed by local interest. 20. Includes $7,339 from emergency relief funds and $274,669 Code 711 funds. 21. Includes $256,000 provided from the Protective Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes $103,733 expended to date on M&O of dams. 22. Includes $25,671 emergency relief funds, $162,381 Code 711 funds and $561,247 Code 713 funds; excludes $500,086 contributed by local interests. 23. Includes $25,671 emergency relief funds, $162,381 Code 711 funds and $561,247 Code 713 funds; excludes $456,611 contributed by local interests. 24. Includes $74,900 Code 711 funds; excludes $4,585,627.29 for new work contributed by local interest. 25.Includes $315,500 provided from the Protective Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes $1,857 appropriated to and expended to date on M&O of dams. 26. Includes $122,729 Code 711 funds and $94,900 Code 713 funds. 27. Includes $8,914 from emergency relief funds. 28. Includes $1,730,100 Code 711 funds and $1,618,300 Code 713 funds. 29. Includes $152,000 provided from the Protective Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes $5,948 appropriated to and expended to date on M&O of dams. 30. Includes $2,303,076 Code 711 funds ($256,760 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act PL 98-8, 1983 funds), $275,900 Code 712 funds, and $24,201 emergency relief funds. 31. Includes $2,303,077 Code 711 funds, ($256,531 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act PL 98-8, 1983 funds), $275,900 Code 712 funds, and $24,201 emergency relief funds. 32. Includes $203,000 provided from the Protective Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes $4,681 appropriated to and expended to date on M&O of dams. 33. Includes $1,671,366 Code 711 funds. 34. Includes $1,671,366 Code 711 funds. 35. Includes $85,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds). 36. Includes $2,846,263 Code 711 funds ($293,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act. (PL 98-8) 1983 funds). 37. Includes $591,000 provided from the Protective Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Includes $11,120 appropriated to and expended to date on M&O of dams. 38. Includes $1,840,000 (non-Federal) original construction cost and an additional $4,205,000 (non-Federal) contributed and $4,180,720 (non-Federal) expended to date. 39. Includes $698,616 expended to date on M&O of dams. 40. Includes $103,757 expended to date on M&O of dams. 41. Includes $4,225,188 (non-Federal funds) contributed and expended to date. 42. Includes $285,000 (non-Federal) contributed funds and $252,971 (non-Federal) expended to date. 43. Includes $4,894,000 appropriated to date for Rehab. Operations and Maintenance and $8,907,000 appropriated to date for Rehab. Construction, General. 44. Includes $4,880,202 expended to date for Rehab. Operations and Maintenance and $8,250,174 expended to date for Rehab. Construction, General. 45. Includes $3,828 appropriated to and expended to date on M&O of dams. 18-18 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZATION LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug 5, 1886 June 3, 1896 July 25, 1912 July 3, 1930 Aug 30, 19351 Aug 30, 19351 June 26, 19342 Mar 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar 3, 1905 Mar 3, 1905 Mar 2, 1907 Mar 4, 1913 Sep 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 Jan 31, 19313 June 26, 19342 1. ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA. (See Section 1 of Text) For lock and dam 1. (Fixed dam contemplated. Sep 29, 1891 Secretary of War authorized change to a moveable dam.) For locks and dams 2 and 3. For locks and dams 4 to 8 inclusive. For a depth of 9 feet in the lower 61 miles. Replace lock and dam 1 by a dredged channel, 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide up to lock 2, and construct new locks and dams 2 and 3, to replace existing locks and dams 2 and 3. Construct lock and dam 9, raising crest of dam 8, and dredging a navigable channel to head of pool 8. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriation for rivers and harbors. MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV Enlarge and improve lock and dam 6; additional works at lock 3; new repair steamer and new dredge boat with equipment; all at an estimated cost of $185,556. Rebuild lock and dam 2 at estimated cost of $655,961. (Estimate increased in 1910 to $698,961.) Acquisition of land and additional improvements at 5 and 6 at a cost of $7,850. Rebuild lock and dam 3 at estimated cost of $589,196. Reconstruct lock and dam 5 at estimated cost of $756,042. Reconstruct lock and dam 6 at estimated cost of $356,400. (Estimate increased in 1916 to $418,860.) Additional improvements at estimated cost as follows: Guide walls and guard walls, 1 to 6, $1,255,130; Lengthen land chamber of lock 3 to 720 feet, $787,722; New chamber (360 feet long), lock 4, $699,786; Lock and dam 7, $1,161,241; Lock and dam 8, $1,165,758; Lock and dam 7 (second chamber), $419,126; Lock and dam 8 (second chamber), $504,465; Reconstruction dam 4, $397,211; Marine ways, repair plant, office and warehouse, $250,000, for a total of $6,640,439. Construct new locks and dam 2.5 miles below existing structure, at estimated cost of $2,175,000 in lieu of work authorized at old lock and dam 4. Chief of Engineers authorized to locate new locks and dam 4 above existing structure and on such site as they may deem most desirable. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. 18-19 Annual Report 1886, p. 1545, Annual Report 1891, p. 2366 H. Doc. 204, 54th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report 1896, p. 2212 H. Doc. 540, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 356, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 16, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 721, 71st Cong., 3d Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 27,73d Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1897, p. 2423 Annual Report 1909, p. 1756 Annual Report 1904, p. 460 H. Doc. 209, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 209, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1217, 62d Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 288, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 22, 70th Cong., 2d Sess. 3. PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZATION LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 Nov 17, 1986 Oct 31, 1992 ELKINS, WV For construction of local flood protection projects. JOHNSTOWN, PA For construction of local flood protection projects. PUNXSUTAWNEY, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA For construction of local flood protection projects. Modification of existing project as follows: Provide 2 new locks and dams similar to Morgantown lock and dam to replace existing locks and dams 12 to 15 inclusive. Provide a movable crest on existing dam 8 to raise existing pool-full elevation 4 feet. Provide a navigation channel of 300-foot minimum bottom width and a 9-foot project depth above lock and dam 8. Provide an extension of navigable channel of upper Monongahela River, into lower Tygart River for 2.1 miles at a maximum bottom width of 200 feet and a 9-foot project depth. Construct new lock and dam 7 (Grays Landing Lock and Dam) as follows: The Grays Landing Lock and Dam will be located 3.0 miles downriver from existing Lock and Dam 7. It will consist of a single lock chamber, 84 feet wide by 720 feet long, with a fixed crest dam 576 feet in length. The existing Maxwell Pool at elevation 763.0 will be shortened three miles and the existing Pool 7 at elevation 778.0 will be extended downriver to the new dam. There will be no change in pool elevation above existing Dam 7. Upon completion of the new replacement lock and dam, existing Lock and Dam 7 will be removed. Total authorized cost is $181,000,000. Replace existing 56'x360' lock chamber at Point Marion Lock and Dam (Lock and Dam 8) with new 84'x720' chamber. Existing movable crest dam to remain; no change in pool elevations. Total authorized cost is $53,600,000. Navigation improvements as follows: The project replaces the fixed crest dam at Locks and Dam 2 with a gated dam; raises the existing pool 2 by 5', constructs twin 84'x720' locks at Locks and Dam 4, and eliminates Locks and Dam 3; lowering the existing pool 3 by 3.2 feet. Authorized cost is $705,000,000. Cost of construction is to be paid equally from the general fund of the Treasury and the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. TYGART RIVER LAKE, WV Construction of a dam and reservoir for low water regulation and flood control 18-20 S. Doc. 100, 81st Cong., lst Sess. 3. Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1985 for Engineering and Design and Land Acquisition and Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 Sec. 301(a). Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1985 for Engineering and Design and Land Acquisition and Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 Sec. 301(a). Water Resources Development Act of 1992; PL 102-580 Sec 101 H. Doc. 1792, 64th Cong. 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 106, 76th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. 5. Jan 11, 1934 Aug 30, 1935 Jun 28, 1938 8. 9. 10. Jun 28, 1938 Jun 28, 1938 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 18-B See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Project and Work Authorized 15. 14. Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 modified by Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended 18-21 BERLIN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. CROOKED CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. EAST BRANCH CLARION RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND NY Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation and recreation. Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, pollution abatement, low water regulation and recreation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. LOYALHANNA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. MAHONING CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. Documents H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 300, 76th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Y PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Date Authorizing Act Act rojct ad Wrk Athoize 22. 21. Jul 3, 1958 Jul 14, 1960 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Aug 28, 1937 Jun 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Jul 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Dec 30, 1963 Jun 18, 1965 May 12, 1967 Aug 13, 1968 Jun 19, 1970 Mar 7, 1974 Oct 22, 1976 18-22 See Section in Text MICHAEL J. KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, low water regulation and recreation. To define cost-sharing arrangement for municipal & industrial water supply & water for pollution abatement purposes. MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low water regulation and water supply storage. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. OHIO RIVER BASIN - Pittsburgh District Construct levees, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin. Projects to be selected by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction. Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable in discretion of Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50,300,000 for local flood protection works. Additional $45 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin, including additional projects in tributary basins. Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan including additional projects in tributary basins. Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin. Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $38 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Authorized phase I design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design of the project for abatement of acid mine drainage in the Clarion River Basin, Pa. Documents H. Doc. 191, 85th Cong. 1st Sess. Pub. Law 86-645 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 Flood Control Committee, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Committee, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 300, 76th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 762, 77th Cong. 2d Sess. H. Doc. 506, 78th Cong. 1st Sess. S. Doc. 20, 81st Cong. 1st Sess. Public Law 88-253, 88th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 6755, 89th Cong., 90th Cong. 1st Sess. Public Law 90-17. 90th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 90-483, 90th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 15166, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 10203, 93rd Cong. River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974. Water Resources Development Act of 1976; Public Law 94-587, Sec. 101(a). 23. Project and Work Authorized REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Date Authorizing Act Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Nov 7, 1966 Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Oct 23, 1962 Oct 23, 1962 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended See Section in Text 24. Project and Work Authorized Documents SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low water regulation and recreation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, area redevelopment and recreation. TIONESTA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. UNION CITY DAM, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, recreation and storage for water quality control. YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND MD Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low-flow augmentation, and pollution abatement, purposes. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. Included in the Emergency Relief program April 8, 1935. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. Public Res. 117, 71st. Cong., 3d Sess. TABLE 18-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 6 of Text) Project Allegheny River, PA, open-channel work Buckhannon River, WV 12 Cheat River, WV 12 Pittsburgh Harbor, PA Status Completed Completed Completed Completed For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1934 1893 1895 1922 Cost to September 30, 1998 Operations and Construction Maintenance 197,000 5,500 12,997 110,663 133,940 81,613 1. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. 2. No Commerce reported. 18-23 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 S. Doc. 109, 89th Cong. 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 S. Doc. 95, 87th Cong. 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 95, 87th Cong. 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 26. 27. 28. 29. 1. 2. 3. PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (All Projects Not Specifically Identified in Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1998 Full Report See Annual Construction Non-Federal Operation and Project and Status Report For (Federal Cost) Cost Maintenance Flood Protection Specifically Authorized Projects Completed: Bradford, PA Brookville, PA Buckhannon, WV Butler, PA DuBois, PA Johnsonburg, PA Kittanning, PA, Part I Latrobe, PA Latrobe, PA Olean, NY Portage, PA Portville, NY Reynoldsville, PA Ridgeway, PA (Elk Creek) Salamanca, NY Washington, PA Wellsville, OH, Section I Wellsville, OH, Section II Youngstown, OH Deferred: Benwood, WV Authorized by Chief of Engineers Completed: Amsterdam, OH Big Run, PA Burgettstown, PA Friendsville, MD Girty's Run, Millvale, PA Granville, PA Leetonia, OH Oil City, PA Oil City Ice Control Structures Root Creek, Bolivar, NY Slovan, PA Sykesville, PA Tarentum, PA Tenmile Creek at Marianna, PA West Little Pine Creek, Etna, PA Wilmore, PA 7,601,763 964,976 1,568,661 1,556,181 4,464,607 674,664 130,317 207,659 2,556,652 3,217,531 150,386 2,070,484 385,494 628,888 2,880,535 789,093 483,910 157,633 3,621,134 1,895,000 289,000 75,000 534,000 910,000 130,000 2,000 44,400 698,000 597,000 14,900 353,000 26,000 72,000 465,000 323,000 113,000 152,200 1962 1963 1972 1970 1979 1958 1949 1951 1970 1954 1965 1954 1959 1964 1972 1964 1956 1956 1976 1954 1964 1965 1986 1987 1986 1964 1981 81,028 183,072 364,208 83,129 41,529 2,655,934 75,908 89,299 43,595 3,927,792 1,591,436 57,811 184,246 136,591 1,554,428 2,021,852 96,853 22,500 35,900 2,200 701,722 3,000 17,200 25,000 9,000 24,600 86,200 1,300 18-24 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 18-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) For Last Cost to September 30, 1998 Full Report See Annual Construction Non-Federal Operation and Project and Status Report For (Federal Cost) Cost Maintenance Active: Ridgeway & Vicinity (on Clarion River)2 1979 132,464 - - Inactive: Black Fork at Hendricks, WV 1972 6,800 - - Oakdale, PA - 14,127 - - Rouseville, PA - 1,642 - Wallace, WV' -11,035 - Weston Mills, Olean, NY - 50,100 - - Weston Mills, Portville, NY - 52,100 - - Reservoirs Other: Rowlesburg Lake, WV 1977 2,873,799 - - 1. Lacks local support. 2. No longer economically justified. 18-25 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Annual Project Report For Adena, OH (Short Creek) Allegany, NY Unit I (Allegheny River)1 Allegany, NY Unit II (Five Mile Creek Area)' Bellaire, OH Brackenridge, Tarentum and Natrona, PA' Brilliant, OH Brockway, PA (Allegheny River Basin) Clarington, OH Coraopolis, PA Dillonvale, OH (Short Creek) Eagle Creek Reservoir, OH Empire-Stratton, OH Follansbee, WV Freeport, PA (Allegheny River) Industry, PA Kittanning, PA, part II (Allegheny River) Lake Chautauqua and Chadakoin River, NY2 Lake Erie-Ohio Canal, OH and PA - 1935 Act Leetsdale, PA , Martins Ferry, OH1 McKees Rocks, PA Mingo Junction, QH Moundsville, WV 1 Muddy Creek Dan, PA1 Neville Island, PA New Cumberland, WV New Kensington and Parnassus, PA1 Pittsburgh, PA (Golden Triangle) Pittsburgh, PA (North Side) Pittsburgh, PA (The (trip) Powhaten Point, OH Proctor, WV Redbank Creep Lake, PA Rochester, PA St. Marys, PA (Allegheny River Basin) Smith Ferry, PA Uniontown, P Warwood, WV Wellsburg, WV West Bridgewater, PA Wheeling, WV Wheeling, WV (North Wheeling) 1 Wheeling, VV (Wheeling Island)' Wilcox, PA� Woodlands, WV' Youghiogheny River, PA and MD (Canalization)' 4 1. Deauthorized under Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL99-662). 2. Local Interests failed to meet requirements of cooperation, authority for project expired Mar. 2, 1970. 1975 1965 1972 1941 1977 1956 1954 1971 Date Deauthorized Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 May 6, 1981 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Jan 1, 1990 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 6, 1977 Mar 2, 1970 May 6, 1981 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Oct 3, 1978 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17,1986 Oct 3, 1978 Oct 3, 1978 Oct 3, 1978 Nov 17 ,1986 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Jan 1, 1990 Nov 17 ,1986 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Mar 5, 1955 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Federal Funds Expended 13,452 4,100 64,851 76,487 194 16,884 100,000 33,031 190,722 1,342,000 25,164 402,459 156,377 13,529 6,387 189,067 21,700 16,761 232,863 Contributed Funds Expended 3. Local interests failed to meet requirements of cooperation, authority for project expired Mar. 5, 1955. 4. Includes $47,195 construction costs expended under previous project and $1,700 O&M costs expended under previous project. 18-26 TABLE 18-H ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA.: LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Dimensions Upper Avail- Normal Depth on Character Width able Lift at Pool Miter Sills at of Type of Year of Length Normal Elevation Normal Pool Foundation Construction Per Opened Miles Cham- to Full Pool (feet, Level' cent to Above ber Width Level mean sea Lower Upper Kind Com- Naviga- No Mouth Nearest Town (Feet) (Feet) (Feet) level) (Feet) (Feet) Lock Dam of Dam Lock Dam plete tion Actual Cost 2 6.7 Aspinwall, PA 56 360 11.0 721.0 12.0 10.9 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19342 $1,763,485 3 14.5 Cheswick, PA 56 360 13.8 734.8 10.8 11.8 Rock Pile-Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19342 1,875,665 4 24.2 Natrona, PA 56 360 10.6 745.4 10.0 8.5 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1927 1,707,690 5 30.4 Freeport, PA 56 360 11.6 757.0 10.5 10.3 Piling Crib-Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1927 1,940,537 6 36.3 Clinton, PA 56 360 12.4 769.4 10.6 10.8 Rock Crib-Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1928 1,523,959 7 45.7 Kittanning, PA 56 360 13.0 782.4 9.8 10.9 Piling Steel Sheet Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1930 1,460,008 Piling 8 52.6 Templeton, PA 56 360 17.8 800.2 10.4 13.8 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1931 2,848,920 9 62.2 Rimer, PA 56 360 22.0 822.2 10.5 11.3 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1938 2,510,373 Total $ 15,630,637 Abandoned lock and daml 591,187 Abandoned lock and dam 2 544,929 Abandoned lock and dam 3 310,103 Demolishing old dam 1 26,001 Dredging channel 1,055,003 Total $ 18,157,860 1. All depths as shown are on guard sills and are controlling depth. 2. Dates shown represent replacement structures. 0 r y O r/ 0 rn 0 0 7d O n r O O y o TABLE 18-I MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA. AND W.V.: LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 3 of Text) Dimensions Upper Depth on Avail- Normal Miter Sills at Character Width able Lift at Pool Normal Pool of Type of Year of Length Normal Elevation Level' Foundation Construction Per Opened Miles Cham- to Full Pool (feet, cent to Above ber Width Level mean sea Lower Upper Kind Com- Naviga- No Mouth Nearest Town (Feet) (Feet) (Feet) level) (Feet) (Feet) Lock Dam of Dam Lock Dam plete tion Actual Cos l 1 11 _TO' �' 0 "t 1 11."C" cc ,AA - -Q . 1o2 " t, I I11.L 3 23.8 4 41.5 BraoocK, YA Elizabeth, PA Charleroi, PA -- 61.2 Maxwell locks 843 and dam, Maxwell, PA -- 82.2 Grays Landing 84 lock and dam, Grays Landing, PA -- 90.8 Point Marion 84 lock and dam, Point Marion, PA -- 102.0 Morgantown lock 84 and dam, Morgantown, WV -- 108.0 Hildebrand lock 84 and dam, 6 miles above Morgantown, WV -- 115.4 Opekiska lock 842 and dam, 13.4 miles above Morgantown, WV 50 30U 110 720 563 360 720 563 360 720 720 8. / 1o.7 10. 1J.9YJ OCK LA ri Ple 8.2 726.9 11.6 11.9 Rock Crib Pile 16.6 743.5 10.7 20.0 Piles Piles 19.5 763.0 15.0 20.5 Rock Rock 720 15.0 778.0 18.0 26.0 Rock Rock 720 19.0 797.0 16.2 16.2 Rock Rock 600 17.0 814.0 14.5 17.8 Rock Rock 600 21.0 835.0 15.0 14.0 Rock Rock 600 22.0 857.0 14.0 17.75 Rock Rock rFixeU .oncreLt IILoncrete 1i u 1i 3 Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19532 Gated Concrete Concrete 100 19322 Gated Concrete Concrete 100 19642 Fixed Concrete Concrete 83 1994 Gated Concrete Concrete 10 19932 Gated Concrete Concrete 100 19502 Gated Concrete Concrete 100 19592 Gated Concrete Concrete 100 19642 t 57 21,551,183 58 23,656,498 56 30,110,889 5 174,238,527 9 118,536,319 45s 8,778,000 5 12,506,829 5 25,179,622 s Marine ways, etc Abandoned lock and dam 1 Abandoned lock and dam 4 Abandoned lock and dam 5 Abandoned lock and dam 6 Abandoned lock and dam 7 Abandoned lock and dam 8 Abandoned lock and dam 9 Abandoned lock and dam 10 Abandoned lock and dam 11 Abandoned lock and dam 12 Abandoned lock and dam 13 Abandoned lock and dam 14 Abandoned lock and dam 15 Dredging channel Total 250,000 1,019,907 780,816 1,074,812 770,449 2,853,580 245,900 191,000 210,445 227,668 200,550 190,691 210,127 175,829 587,899 $467,583,598 TABLE 18-I MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA. AND W.VA.: LOCKS AND DAMS (see Section 3 of Text) 1. All depths as shown are on guard sills and are controlling depth. 2.. Dates shown for locks and dams number 2 to 8 inclusive, represent reconstruction. 3. 2 Chambers. 4. Includes $3,322,057 for raising crest of dam, (1958-9), $2,086,438 for original reconstruction (1923-1926), $618,758 AE&D costs for replacement of lock, and $112,509,066 for replacement of lock ($56,119,588 CG funds; $56,389,478 from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund). 5. Actual cost: may include estimated costs which have been footnoted as necessary. 6. Includes $2,173,767 for original reconstruction (1931-2), and $15,080,304 for reconstruction of dam (1963-1967). 7. Includes $16,967,114 for reconstruction of locks. 8. Includes $15,857,000 for major rehabilitation. 9. Includes AE&D costs for proposed lock ($803,000) and $87,102,966 expended from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. 10.Includes $213,776 original project and $2,639,804 for reconstruction (1925). b C 0 O H r 0 H C, 0 H C J O r to tG v3 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-J MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV: TOTAL COSTS OF EXISTING PROJECT TO END OF FISCAL YEAR (See Section 3 of Text) Operation and Maintenance, Funds New Work General Total Regular $467,583,598 3 $299,089,2342 $766,672,832 2 3 Maintenance and operation 452,623 452,623 Public Works acceleration, executive (1963) - 22,549 22,549 Total $467,583,59813 $299,564,4062 $767,148,00412 3 1. Includes $5,420,541 for new work for previous proj- 3. Includes $15,857,000 for major rehabilitation ofL /D 3; ects. $166,026,462 for replacement of L/D 7 ($83,271,383 provided 2. Includes $20,446,587 expended between July 7, 1897 by Inland Waterways Trust Fund); and $109,552,616 for reand June 30, 1937, on operation and care of works of improve- placement of the lock at Point Marion Lock and Dam ment under provisions of permanent appropriation for such ($54,845,083 provided by Inland Waterways Trust Fund). purposes and excludes $742 for maintenance of previous projects. TABLE 18-K OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT): RESERVOIRS (See Section 22 of Text) Total Tributary Basin and Reservoir Stream Cost Allegheny: Conemaugh River, PA Conemaugh River $46,012,411 Crooked Creek, PA Crooked Creek 4,482,933 East Branch Clarion River, PA Clarion River 9,539,586 Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, PA and NY Allegheny River 112,226,0761 Loyalhanna, PA Loyalhanna Creek 5,727,531 Mahoning Creek, PA Mahoning Creek 7,144,973 Tionesta, PA Tionesta Creek 7,792,378 Union City, PA French Creek 14,559,800 Woodcock Creek, PA Woodcock Creek 20,545,065 Beaver: Berlin, OH Mahoning River 8,739,987 Michael J. Kirwan, OH Mahoning River 17,376,097 Mosquito Creek, OH Mosquito Creek 4,253,029 Shenango River, PA and OH Shenango River 40,217,201 Monongahela: Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV West Fork River $211,339,623 2 Youghiogheny River, PA and MD Youghiogheny River 12,521,167 1. Includes $2,921,000 for dam rehabilitation. 2. Actual cost. Latest cost estimate (1991) is $231,000,000. 18-30 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 18-L INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 29 of Text) Project Amsterdam, OH Big Run, PA Bolivar, NY Bradford, PA Brookville, PA Buckhannon, WV Burgettstown-Slovan, PA Butler, PA Chartiers Creek, PA Cannonsburg-Houston Reach James G. Fulton Reach Colliers, WV DuBois, PA Eldred, PA Etna, PA Friendsville, MD Granville, PA Johnsonburg, PA Kittaning, PA Latrobe, PA Leetonia, OH Dates of Inspection Apr 1998 Oct 1997 May 1998 Apr 1998 Jun 1997 Oct 1997 Jan 1997 Apr 1998 Mar 1998 Nov 1997 Sep 1994 Oct 1997 Apr 1987 Mar 1998 Feb 1998 Mar 1998 Apr 1998 Apr 1997 Sep 1998 May 1998 Project Marianna, PA Millvale, PA Oil City Ice Control Structure, Allegheny River, PA Oil City LPP-(Dike), PA Olean, NY Portage, PA Portville, NY Reynoldsville, PA Ridgway, PA Salamanca, NY Stonewood-Nutter Fort, WV Sykesville, PA Tarentum, PA Turtle Creek, PA Washington, PA Wellsville, OH Weston, WV Wilmore, PA Youngstown, OH Dates of Inspection Jun 1998 Mar 1998 Apr 1998 Apr 1998 May 1998 May 1998 May 1998 Apr 1998 Apr 1998 May 1998 Jun 1992 Aug 1995 Sep 1997 Mar 1998 Mar 1998 Sep 1998 Oct 1996 Nov 1996 May 1998 18-31 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-M FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 33 of Text) Flood Control Activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) Project/Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Cheat River Basin FWS, WV 208,472 Connellsville, PA (initial appraisal) 41,244 Connoquenessing Cr, Marion Twp. 2,298 Connoquenessing Cr, North Sewickley Twp. 82,602 Coordination Account (Sec 205) 14,643 Jackson Twp., Butler Co., PA 67,923 Mahoning River, Struthers, OH 16,775 Pigeon Creek, Monongahela, PA 6,172 Seitz Run, Allegheny Co., PA 8.003 Total Cost for Current Fiscal Year: $448,132 Emergency Streambank Protection - Section 14 of the 1846 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress Project/Study Identification Brush Creek, Jeannette, PA (planning & design analysis) Buffalo Creek, Freeport, PA (planning & design analysis) Chubb Run, Franklin, PA (completed) Conneaut Lake, PA (awaiting construction approval) Coordination Account (Sec 14) French Creek, Wattsburg, PA (construction) Mahoning River, Warren, OH (completed) Mon River, Water St., Pt. Marion Moundsville, Ohio River, WV (planning & design analysis) Nickleplate Rd., French Creek, Fairfield, PA Ohio River, Chester, WV (planning & design analysis) Sewage Treatment Plant, Point Marion, PA (planning & design analysis) Fiscal Year Costs 10,129 4,858 31 30,242 10,979 34,710 11,378 12,271 661,819 6,218 204,667 30.121 Total Cost for Current Fiscal Year: $1,017,423 18-32 OHIO RIVER For actual construction of locks and dams, and operation and care of completed structures, river is divided into three sections under immediate supervision and direction of District Engineers at Pittsburgh, Huntington, and Louisville. Pittsburgh section extends 127 miles from head of river at Pittsburgh, PA, to a point immediately upstream from New Martinsville, WV, and includes Emsworth, Dashields, Montgomery, New Cumberland, Pike Island, and Hannibal Locks and Dams. Huntington section extends 311 miles from mile 127 to 438 immediately upstream from Foster, KY, and includes Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Robert C. Byrd, Greenup, and Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dams. Louisville section extends 543 miles from mile 438 to mouth of river, and includes Markland and McAlpine Locks and Dams (with Louisville and Portland Canal), Cannelton, Newburgh, John T. Myers, and Smithland Locks and Dams, and Locks and Dams 52 and 53. Improvements Navigation 1. Construction of locks and dams on Ohio River .................................... ...... 19-1 2. Open channel work, Ohio River ............... 19-3 Tables Table 19-A Table 19-B Table 19-C Table 19-D Table 19-E Cost and Financial Statement...... 19-4 Authorizing Legislation ................ 19-5 Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Navigation 1. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS ON OHIO RIVER Location. Ohio River is formed by junction of Allegheny and Monongahela Rivers at Pittsburgh, PA, and flows generally southwesterly for 981 miles to join Mississippi River near Cairo, IL. For description of river see page 1227, 1932 Annual Report. Previous Projects. For details see page 1907 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for improvement of entire river by construction of locks and dams to provide channel depth of 9 feet and for widening Louisville and Portland Canal at Louisville, KY. Project provides for a lock with usable dimensions of 110 by 600 feet at each of the dams and, in addition, an auxiliary lock 56 by 360 feet is available at Emsworth, Dashields, Montgomery, and McAlpine Locks and Dams with an auxiliary lock at Robert C. Byrd being 110 by 1,200 feet. Dashields and McAlpine are fixed dams, while Emsworth, Montgomery, and Robert C. Byrd are fixed dams with movable crests. Remaining dams are movable type, with navigable pass varying in width from 600 to 1,248 feet. In addition to navigable pass, movable-type dams are also provided with one or more regulating weirs. At McAlpine Locks and Dam, a canal (Louisville and Portland) extends along left bank for 2 miles, with locks at lower end. Modifica- Table 19-F Not Applicable Table 19-G Not Applicable Table 19-H Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River, Total Cost of Existing Project ........................................ 19-6 Table 19-I Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Licenses of Locks and Dams, Ohio River ............... 19-6 Table 19-J Ohio River Locks and Dams Statistics ...................................... 19-7 tions to existing project under purview of Section 6, March 3, 1909 Act, provide for fixed dams with movable crests with two locks (110 by 1,200 feet and 110 by 600 feet) at New Cumberland, Pike Island, Hannibal, Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Greenup, Captain Anthony Meldahl, Markland, Cannelton, Newburgh, and John T. Myers; two locks 110 by 1,200 feet at Smithland; 110- by 1,200-foot temporary locks in addition to the existing locks at Locks and Dams 52 and 53, and reconstruction to provide a 110- by 1,200-foot lock in addition to existing locks and a fixed dam with two sections of movable crest at McAlpine Locks and Dam; widening Louisville and Portland Canal to 500 feet. Auxiliary lock 56 by 360 feet at McAlpine Locks and Dam has been inoperative since failure of downstream lock gates in December 1972. Rehabilitation of existing Locks and Dams 52 and 53 was started in September 1979 under the purview of Section 6, March 1909 Act. Mound City was also considered authorized under purview of 1909 Act, and preconstruction planning was performed in the period 1965 to 1972. The ruling of the U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, on September 6, 1974, with reference to Lock and Dam 26, Mississippi River, would also apply to this project. Consequently, it is no longer considered authorized. Operation and care of locks and dams were included in project July 1, 1935, under provisions of Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act ofJune 26,1934. Estimated Federal cost of new work, is $3,051,030,299; non-Federal cost is $465,914. Foregoing estimate does not include expendi- 19-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 tures on previous projects. Various items previously included in this project are considered inactive or unnecessary and are excluded from foregoing cost estimate. See page 693, Annual Report, 1968, for items and estimated cost. Under authority of 1910 River and Harbor Act, Louisville and Portland Canal was widened to 200 feet; Locks and Dams 40 and 42 eliminated; Locks and Dams 1 and 2 replaced by Emsworth Locks and Dam; Lock and Dam 3 replaced by Dashields Locks and Dam; and Locks and Dams 4, 5, and 6 replaced by Montgomery Locks and Dam. Locks and Dams 24, 25, and 26 were replaced by Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam authorized by August 30, 1935, Act, and constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River. Locks and Dams 7, 8, and 9 were replaced by New Cumberland Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 10 and 11 were replaced by Pike Island Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 12, 13, and 14 were replaced by Hannibal Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 15, 16, and 17 were replaced by Willow Island Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 18, 19, and 20 were replaced by Belleville Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 21, 22, and 23 were replaced by Racine Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 27, 28, 29, and 30 were replaced by Greenup Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 31, 32, 33, and 34 were replaced by Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 35, 36, 37, 38, and 39 were replaced by Markland Locks and Dam; the Louisville and Portland Canal at McAlpine Locks and Dam was widened to 500 feet. Locks and Dams 43, 44, and 45 were replaced by Cannelton Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 46 and 47 were replaced by Newburgh Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 48 and 49 were replaced by John T. Myers Locks and Dam, and Locks and Dams 50 and 51 were replaced by Smithland Locks and Dam, as modifications to existingproject under purview ofSection 6, March 3,1909 Act, reducing total number of structures to 20. The Water Resources Development Act of 1974 combined the Newburgh Bank Protection Works project with the Newburgh Locks and Dam project. A December 1981 Act established the Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area near McAlpine Locks and Dam to protect and preserve existing fossilized coral and a diversity of wildlife. A November 17, 1988 Act authorized a replacement structure for Locks & Dams 52 & 53 at Olmsted, IL. A November 28, 1990 Act authorized an interpretive center at the Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area near McAlpine Locks & Dam and a replacement of the existing 110 foot x 600 foot lock at McAlpine Locks & Dam, IN & KY. Table 19-J contains data relative to various features of locks and dams included in existing project. For list of principal towns and cities along Ohio River with their mileage below Pittsburgh, PA, see page 1060, 1962 Annual Report. See Table 19-I for licenses. Navigation system of 20 locks and dams is in operation and 9-foot navigation throughout length of river is generally available at all times. At certain unstable bars project depth is maintained by dredging, supplemented by contraction works. (See "Open Channel Work, Ohio River.") Table 19-J shows cost and year completion of locks and dams now in operation. Existing project does not provide adequate facilities for present day navigation due to obsolescence of structures. Since repair and modernization of these facilities would be extremely costly, replacement and reconstruction is being accomplished as rapidly as funds are made available for the purpose. Construction of lock and dam replacement program was initiated in Fiscal Year 1955. New Cumberland, Pike Island, Hannibal, Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Greenup, Captain Anthony Meldahl, Markland, McAlpine, Cannelton, Newburgh, John T. Myers, and Smithland replacement locks and dams are in operation, replacing 39 old low-lift locks and dams. For total cost of existing project, see Table 19-H. Terminal facilities. Modern public terminals, with warehouses, equipped with operating machinery for transferring materials, have been constructed by private interests at some of the larger cities and towns. A list of terminals on Ohio River is revised annually and can be obtained from Division Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer Division, Ohio River, Cincinnati, Ohio. Operations during fiscal year. New work by contract and hired labor: Willow Island Locks and Dam: Construction was initiated in January 1967. All work is complete. Belleville Locks and Dam: Construction was initiated in May 1962. All work is complete. Racine Locks and Dam: Construction initiated in June 1964 is complete. Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam: The existing project, constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River, was placed in operation in August 1937. The dimensions of the existing locks chambers and poor approach conditions, particularly to downstream traffic, have created a higher than normal accident rate to the structure with corresponding hazards and delays to traffic. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976 authorized Phase I studies for 1,200-foot locks in a bypass canal. These studies are complete. Initial Construction, General funds for the continuation of Engineering activities were received in September 1985. Real estate acquisition is complete. The contract for the Locks was awarded in October 1987 and is complete. The contract for the Dam Rehabilitation was awarded in June 1993 and is 94 percent complete. The total estimated cost of the project is $373 million, which is 50 percent federal cost and 50 percent Inland Waterways Trust Fund cost. Greenup Locks and Dam: Construction was initiated in October 1954. All work is complete. Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam: Construction work complete. Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conversation Area Was authorized by 97-137 on December 29,1981 and modified by Public Law 101-640 on November 28,1990 to design and construct an interpretive center. The Conservation Area will protect 1,000 acres which consists of birdlife and other wildlife. Planning consisted of efforts to define facilities to be cost shared with local interests. All Real Estate tracts have been acquired and one tract remains in a condemnation trial. A construction contract to construct the cost-shared recreation facilities was 19-2 OHIO RIVER awarded on 30 September 1993, and completed in February 1995. McAlpine Locks and Dam: Project is complete except for alteration of lift section of railroad bridge that spans the upper end of the Louisville and Portland Canal which work is presently deferred. Areplacement of the existing 110 foot x 600 foot lock with a new 100 foot x 1,200 foot lock was authorized by WRDA of 1990 in Public Law 101- 640. Construction has been initiated and has advanced to 7 percent completion through FY 1998. $19,564,000 has been expended for the lock replacement and ancillary efforts. Olmsted Locks & Dam: A replacement structure for Locks and Dams 52 & 53 was authorized by the WRDA of 1988 in Public Law 100-676 on 17 November 1988. Planning Engineering and Design continued. The dam prototype construction contract was awarded 18 March 1994 and is complete. A contract to construct the lock was awarded 6 December 1995 and has advanced to 65 percent completion. A contract to construct the Water Management Facilities at the Ballard Wildlife Management Area was awarded on 6 May 1996 and has been completed. In FY 98, $76,173,128 was expended on the Olmsted project. Operation and maintenance, general. Locks and dams operated as required and necessary repairs and improvements made thereto and to operator's quarters, grounds and esplanades. Costs were $14,384,824 for Huntington District, $20,206,148 for Louisville District and $14,971,141 for Pittsburgh District. 2. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER Location. Under jurisdiction of district engineer in whose district work is located. Portion of river included in project extends 974.7 miles from head of river at Pittsburgh, PA, to mouth of Cache River (Mound City, IL). Open channel improvement from mouth of Cache River to mouth of Ohio River is under jurisdiction of Mississippi River Commission. Existing Projects. Before completion of canalization project, no project depth had been fixed by Congress under project for open channel work; but, in order to properly aid packet and barge navigation, it was necessary to secure a low-water channel with a minimum depth of4 to 6 feet, and a width, depending upon difficulty of running channel, of 400-600 feet; also, to permit movement of large coal tows, which movement occurred at stages of water exceeding 10 feet, it was necessary to remove points of projecting bars which formed at various locations along river. Accomplishment of this purpose involved concentration of current by closing back channels at islands with low dams, contraction and straightening wide open channels by low dikes, dredging bars and shoals, and removal of snags and wrecks. Incidental to direct improvement of Ohio River is construction and maintenance of ice piers as required for protection of river craft. Stage of extreme high water on Ohio River varies from 46 feet at Pittsburgh, PA, to 80 feet at Cincinnati, OH, with 57.2 feet at Louisville, KY (head of falls, 53.8 feet at Evansville, IN, and 59.5 feet at Cairo, IL (mouth of river). Estimated cost of new work is $16.16 million, exclusive of following items which are considered inactive: Ice piers authorized by 1927 River and Harbor Act; reforestation of sloughs of Kentucky Peninsula near Evansville, IN, authorized by 1930 River and Harbor Act; dredging to widen channel at certain points; and placing revetment at various points. Estimated cost of these items is $6,565,000. Operation of snag boats on Ohio River below Pennsylvania State line was included in project July 1, 1935, under provisions of Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act ofJune 26,1934. See Table 19- B for authorizing legislation. New work under this project is substantially complete, since it is not anticipated that work on inactive portion of project will be accomplished. In addition to dredging, local stabilization of channel has been effected atvarious points by construction of dikes and revetment. Work which remains consists of dredging to widen channels at certain points to project depth. Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act ofJanuary 21,1927, authorizing construction of ice piers for general open channel work, imposes condition that before work is begun on any pier, local interests convey to the United States free of cost such riparian rights as may be deemed necessary in connection with the improvements at locality (H. Doc. 187, 67th Congr., 2nd Sess.). Existing ice piers are adequate for present purposes and local cooperation is not needed since no additional construction is under consideration. River and Harbor Act of July 3, 1930, provides for reforestation of sloughs of Kentucky Peninsula and bank protection and that no expense shall be incurred by the United States for acquiring lands required for purpose of this improvement (H. Doc. 409, 69th Congr., 1st Sess.). However, since no serious overbank erosion has occurred since bank revetment in 1933-34, reforestation is not considered justifiable at this time and no local cooperation is required. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Dredging was done where required to provide an adequate and dependable channel of project depth at minimum pool conditions. Dikes and revetments were maintained and routine work of maintaining navigation aids, removing snags, making channel studies, hydrographic surveys and mapping was performed as required. Channel soundings, hydrographic surveys, steam gaging operations, channel inspections and aids to navigation, and miscellaneous inspections and reports cost $1,563,035. In FY 98 dredging by hired labor on the Ohio River totaled 2,486 cubic yards at $34,205. Dredging by contract: Huntington District 504,147 cubic yards at $1,797,022. Louisville District 1,565,380 cubic yards at $3,454,798. 19-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Table 19-A Cost and Financial Statement See Section Total Cost To in text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep 30, 1998 1. Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River 2. Open Channel Work, Ohio River New Work Approp. $: Cost Maint Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Rehab. (O&M) Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 21,884,436 $47,746,000 64,796,592 65,860,939 $82,267,653 82,495,874 90,840,000 $2,065,547,761 1 3 5 10 17 21 90,492,313 2,062,897,733 1 3 611 12 16 18 22 54,116,000 53,311,000 56,903,026 49,786,050 1,113,207,689 2 4 19 53,869,472 53,785,905 58,600,008 49,562,113 1,111,094,830 2 13 14 192o 82,972,138 82,972,138 33,914,252 33,914,252 15,962,260 8 15,962,260 8 5,656,100 5,125,000 5,636,283 6,250,100 168,356,364 7 9 5,832,476 5,969,560 5,549,421 5,737,473 167,649,617 7 9 0 0 944,649 944,649 1 Includes $17,003,761 for previous 6-foot canalization project. 2 Includes $36,943,217 expended from 1885 to 1937 on operation and care of work of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriations for such purposes. a Includes $215,812 public works acceleration, executive 1963. 4 Includes $38,766 public works acceleration, executive 1963. 5 Excludes $251,769 contributed funds for new work. 6 Excludes $250,102 contributed funds for new work. 7 Excludes $1,621,349 expended in operation of snag boats under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes, and $267 transferred to project without reimbursement. 8 Includes $1,040,236 Public Works funds. 9 Includes $1,000 for removal of obstructions in Licking River under authority of Section 3, R&H Act of 1930. 1 Includes $100,000 placed in Fiscal Year 1971 Budget Reserve. u Excludes $3,899 transferred from project without reimbursement. * Surplus property valued at $3,553 transferred to project without reimbursement. Excludes $2,140 transferred to project without reimbursement. '4 Excludes surplus property valued at $73,832 transferred to project without reimbursement. ' Includes $87,724,158 prior construction cost. '4 Excludes surplus property valued at $297,385 transferred to project without reimbursement. 17 Includes $549,392 Code 710 Funds, $572,162 Code 711 Funds, $532,677 Code 712 Funds, and $1,759,812 Code 713 funds. '4 Includes $549,392 Code 710 Funds, $342,162 Code 711 Funds, $532,677 Code 712 Funds, and $1,989,812 Code 713 Funds. '4 Includes $2,158,073 Funds provided from The Productive Employment Appropriations Act of 1983 (PL 98-8). * Includes $920,945 cost for operations and care of previous projects. a Includes $342,259,000 Inland Waterways Trust Funds. '4 Includes $340,970,982 Inland Waterways Trust Funds. ' Excludes $9,525,437 settlement from the U.S. Treasury Dept Judgement Fund. 19-4 OHIO RIVER Table 19-B Authorizing Legislation See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. March 3, 1827 January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 July 3, 1958 Open Channel Work, Ohio River Project adopted by this act originally cov ered entire length of Ohio River from its mouth near Cairo to Pittsburgh, a distance of 981 miles. It provided for removal of all obstructions which tend to endanger steamboat navigation. Construct ice piers as a part of allotted from appropriations for general open channel work. Reforestation of sloughs on Kentucky Peninsula near Evansville, IN, and a 200-foot strip along bank and for bank protection, at an estimated cost of $200,000. Act of March 3, 1827, modified to include maintenance of existing Licking River Channel within lower 3-mile limit of river slack water, at an estimated increase of $1,000 in cost of average annual maintenance. H. Doc. 187, 67th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 409, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 434, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. Locks and Dams, Ohio River Act of December 29, 1981, established the 1,000-acre Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area, at a cost not to exceed $300,000. Act of November 17, 1988 authorized a replacement structure for Locks and Dams 52 and 53 at Olmsted, Illinois. Act of November 28, 1990, modified PL 97-137 by authorizing an interpretive center at Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area, at a estimated total cost of $3,200,000. Act of November 28, 1990 authorized a modernization of the existing 110 foot x 600 foot lock at McAlpine Locks and Dam, Indiana and Kentucky at a total cost of $219,600,000 with one-half appropriated from the Treasury and one-half from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. Act of October 31, 1992 renamed the Gallipolis Locks and Dam to the Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam. H.R. 2241, PL97-137, Title II, 95 Stat. 1710 PL 100-676, 100th Cong., 2nd Sess. PL 101-640, 101st Cong., 2nd Sess. PL 101-640, 101st Cong., 2nd Sess. PL 102-580, 102nd Cong., 2nd Sess. 19-5 December 29, 1981 November 17, 1988 November 28, 1990 November 28, 1990 October 31, 1992 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMYON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 19-H Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River Total Cost of Existing Project to September 30, 1997 (See Section 1 of Text) Operations and Maintenance Funds New Work General Rehabilitation Total Regular $1,970,500,558 $1,070,133,113 $116,886,390 $3,157,520,061 Public Works 3,258,368 0 0 3,258,368 Emergency Relief 1,198,837 19,000 0 1,217,837 Maintenance & Operation 0 3,039,789 0 3,039,789 Public Works Acceleration 215,812 38,766 0 254,578 Executive 1963 0 0 0 0 0 Total $1,975,173,575 $1,073,230,668 $116,886,390 $3,165,290,633 'Excludes $36,943,217 expended from 1885 to 1937 under perma- 3 Excludes $87,724,158 prior construction cost. nent indefinite appropriation. 4 Includes $33,914,252 cost for O & M Rehabilitation. 2Excludes $920,945 cost for operation and care of previous projects. Note: All other cost variations are listed in the Footnotes of Table 19- A. Table 19-I Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Licenses At Locks and Dams, Ohio River Markland Dam McAlpine Dam Racine Dam Greenup Dam Hannibal Dam F.E.R.C License 2,211 289:1,000 2,570 2,614 3,206 License Public Service Co. of Indiana Annual Charge $ 45,950.00 Louisville Gas and Electric Co. $ 95,000.00 Collections to end of Fiscal Year 1998 $1,468,511.64 $9,195,353.84 Ohio Power Co. $ 64,232.00 $1,018,075.00 City of Vanceburg, Kentucky $ 261,103.00 $3,890,368.00 City of New Martinsville, WV -0- $197,589.03 19-6 Table 19-J Ohio River Locks and Dams (See Section 1 of Text) Upper Normal Greatest Pool Length Elevation Depth on Width Available (feet, Miter Sills Actual Cost Lock Miles of For Full mean Character of Year to Date and Below Distance From Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Foundation Percent Opened to Each Lo Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and Da 1 - Replaced 6.2 Emsworth Locks and Dam, Emsworth, PA 2 - Replaced 3 - Replaced 13.3 Dashields Locks and Dam 1.6 miles below Sewickley, PA 4 - Replaced 5 - Replaced 6 - Replaced 31.7 Montgomery Locks and Dam, 1.4 miles above Industry, PA 7 - Replaced 8 - Replaced 54.4 New Cumberland Locks and Dam, Stratton, OH - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 84.3 Pike Island Locks and Dam, 2 miles upstream from Warwood, WV - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 126.4 Hannibal Locks and Dam, 1.6 miles upstream from New Martinsville, WV 15 - Replaced 16 - Replaced 161.7 Willow Island Locks and Dam, 2.7 miles above Waverly, WV 110 56 110 56 110 56 600 360 600 360 600 360 110 1,200 110 600 18.0 710.0 17.0 14 12.9 3 Rock Rock 15.5 1 5 12.9 3 10.0 692.0 17.5 682.0 20.5 664.5 13.41 16.01 and Piles 17.53 Rock Rock 14.63 Rock Rock and and Piles Piles 7.01 14.83 Rock Rock -- $ 870,034 100 1921 $ 43,347,635 214 - - 976,767 - - 1,144,588 100 1929 37,447,328 15 100 1936 37,754,307 16 - - 1,075,000 - - 1,167,456 100 1959 39,099,688 - 1,177,100 - 1,138,000 - 1,162,165 110 110 110 110 110 110 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 21.0 644.0 21.0 623.0 20.0 602.0 17.01 38.0 35.0 18.0' Rock 17.0 Rock 15.0 Rock and Piles Rock Rock Rock 100 1968 56,623,946 - - 1,166,104 - - 1,222,389 - - 1,133,371 99 1972 87,902,000 - - 1,180,478 - - 1,275,532 100 1972 78,173,881 of ck mn 9 10 11 12 13 14 1,071,472 1,080,132 1,123,442 0 0 Table 19.4 Ohio River Locks and Dams (See Section 1 of Text) Upper Normal Greatest Pool Length Elevation Depth on Width Available (feet, Miter Sills Actual Cost Lock Miles of For Full mean Character of Year to Date and Below Distance From Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Foundation Percent Opened to Each Lo Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and Da - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 103.9 Belleville Locks and Dam, 0.3 mile below Reedsville, OH - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 237.5 Racine Locks and Dam, 1.5 miles below Letart Falls, OH - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 279.2 Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam, 0.7 mile below 6 Hogsett, WV Robert C. Byrd Modernization 110 110 110 110 1,200 600 1,200 600 22.0 582.0 37.0 15.03 Rock and Piles Rock of ck m 1,362,591 927,091 1,213,848 936,696 100 1968 62,591,255 - 1,484,562 - 1,218,798 - 1,851,488 22.0 560.0 18.0 15.0 Rock and Piles Rock 100 1971 64,922,680 1,187,542 1,925,205 1,307,241 110 1,200 3,452,066 27 Rehab Dam and New Lock 27 - Replaced 28 - Replaced 29 - Replaced 30 - Replaced 341.0 Greenup Locks and Dam, 4.9 miles below Greenup, KY - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 436.2 CaptainAnthony Meldahl Locks and Dam, 2.2 miles above Foster, KY 110 110 110 110 1,200 600 1,200 600 23.0 538.0 18.0 15.0 Rock Rock 100 1992 334,840,373 17 1,063,133 1,088,802 1,579,618 30.0 515.0 18.01 13.0 Rock Rock 100 1959 57,464,191 1,359,231 2,951,216 1,937,166 3,437,057 110 1,200 110 600 30.0 485.0 18.01 15.0 Rock Rock 100 1962 74,188,216 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 0Im A O A m O 00 31 32 33 34 Table 19-J Ohio River Locks and Dams (See Section 1 of Text) Upper Normal Greatest Pool Length Elevation Depth on Width Available (feet, Miter Aio Actual Cost Lock Miles of For Full mean Character of Year to Date and Below Distance From Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Foundation Percent Opened to Each Lo Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and Dm of ck m 35 36 - Replaced - Replaced 37 - Replaced 38 - Replaced 531.5 Markland Locks and Dam, 1 mile above Markland, IN 39 - Replaced 40 - Eliminated 41 - - Falls of the Ohio, 1 mile above McAlpine 604.0 McAlpine Locks and Dam (Reconstruction of Locks and Dam 41) 42 - Eliminated 43 - Replaced 44 - Replaced 45 - Replaced 720.7 Cannelton Locks and Dam, 3 miles above Cannelton, IN 46 - Replaced 776.1 Newburgh Locks and Dam, 16 miles above Evansville, IN 47 - Replaced 48 - Replaced 49 - Replaced 846.0 John T. Myers Locks and Dam, 3.5 miles below Uniontown, KY 50 - Replaced 51 - Replaced 110 1,200 110 600 35.0 455.0 50.0 15.0 Rock Piles - - 1,894,942 - - 3,704,535 - - 1,297,924 - - 2,857,040 100 1963 63,019,403 2,222,448 N/A 110 110 56 110 110 N/A 1,200 600 360 1,200 600 N/A N/A 37.0 25.0 49.0 420.0 383.0 12.0 19.0 19.0 11.0 Rock 11.0 38.0 13.0 Rock Rock Rock - - 7,658,134 7 0 N/A 2,364,774 100 1961 65,290,290 ' - - 2,592,242 - - 2,819,930 - - 3,202,890 100 1972 99,032,866 10 3,129,028 110 1,200 110 600 110 1,200 110 600 16.0 358.0 32.0 16.0 Rock Pile 99 1975 104,496,840 4,415,526 3,062,710 3,325,964 22.0 342.0 34.0 12.0 Rock Rock 99 1975 100,326,373 3,571,762 4,370,566 Table 19-J Ohio River Locks and Dams (See Section 1 of Text) Upper Normal Greatest Pool Length Elevation Depth on Width Available (feet, Miter iiiC Actual Cost Lock Miles of For Full mean Character of Year to Date and Below Distance From Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Foundation Percent Opened to Each Lo Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and Da 918.5 Smithland Locks 110 1,200 and Dam, 2 110 1,200 22.0 324.0 34.0 12.0 Rock Rock 99 1980 273,725,47: miles above Smithland, KY 52 938.9 1.4 miles below 110 600 12.0 302.0 15.4 11.0 Pile Pile 100 1928 13,337,74 Brookport, IL 938.9 1.4 miles below 110 1,200 12.0 302.0 15.4 11.0 Pile Pile 100 1969 10,197,51( Brookport, IL (New lock) 964.4 Olmsted Locks & 110 1,200 21.0 300.0 18.0 18.0 Pile Pile 12 2007 317,956.28' Dam at Olmsted, IL 53 962.6 10.8 miles 110 600 13.4 290.0 15.4 9.69 Pile Pile 100 1929 10,004,24( above Mound City, IL 962.6 10.8 miles 110 1,200 13.4 290.0 15.4 9.6 Pile - 100 1982 38,570,92 above Mound City, IL (New lock) 974.2 Mound City - - - - - - - - 1,539,47 Lock and Dam, 1 mile below Mound City, IL TOTAL $2,172,770,71 of ck m 1 7 11 6 7 18 0 12 0 0 18 820 1Depths are on emergency dam foundation and recontrolling depths. 2 Change from fixed dam to lift-gate dam completed in 1938. 8 Depths are on poiree dam foundation and are controlling depths. 4Land chamber. 5River chamber. 6 Roller-gate dam. Cost not included in total. Constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River. 7 Lock and Dam 41 completed with 110- by 600-foot lock in 1921. Completed with new dam and raised canal and lock wall in 1928. Auxiliary 56- by 360-foot lock constructed in 1929-30. Reconstruction and modernization began 1956, renamed McAlpine Locks and Dam in 1960. Operation of auxiliary lock suspendedin 1971. s Existing structures are complete except for deferred alteration of railroad bridge. Construction of the new 110 foot x 1,200 foot lock has not yet begun. 9 Dam below not yet constructed. Depth on lower miter sill at lower water. 10 Excludes $2,219,975 payment for settlement of damage to dam caused by barge accident in April 1978. " Major rehabilitation ($8,876,000) initiated in FY 79 is complete. 12 Major rehabilitation ($4,593,572) initiated in FY 79 is complete. 13 For preconstruction planning 1965 to 1972. No longer considered authorized. (See Section 1 of Text.) 4 Includes $37,485,870 for major rehabilitation completed in FY 84 15 Includes $33,914,252 for major rehabilitation completed in FY 90 (O&M funds). '1 Includes $33,016,696 for major rehabilitation completed in FY 89. 17 Includes $172,237,647 Inland Waterways Trust Funds. 8 Includes $159,001,291 Inland Waterways Trust Funds. '9 Includes $9,732,044 Inland Waterways Trust Funds. 20 Exclusive of $7,013,405 details below. Additonal Festures Entering into Cost of Project Louisville and Portland Canal and Indiana chute (under previous project). Examinations, survey contingencies, plants, and miscellaneous Waterfront Development at Huntington, WV (Greenup Pool) Recreation facilities, pool area, Gallipolis Locks and Dam. $5,359,203 966,232 19,170 668,800 Total 7,013,405 Grand Total $2,179,784,123 O C 0I A 0 I 0IA C, 0 A y H O d ea oc BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT * The district comprises OH, northwestern PA and western and northern NY, embracing U.S. waters of Lake Erie exclusive of a small portion of western end, Lake Ontario, and St. Lawrence River, with their tributary drainage basins from boundary between the states of OH and MI to international boundary line east of Frontier, NY. IMPROVEMENTS NAVIGATION FLOOD CONTROL Ashtabula Harbor, OH Black Rock Chnl & Tonawanda Hbr, NY Buffalo Harbor, NY Buffalo Hbr Environmental Dredging Cattaraugus Harbor, NY Cleveland Harbor, OH Conneaut Harbor, OH Dunkirk Harbor, NY Erie Harbor, PA Fairport Harbor, OH Great Sodus Bay Harbor, NY Huron Harbor, OH Irondequoit Bay, NY Little Sodus Bay Harbor, NY Lorain Harbor, OH NYS Canal System Oak Orchard Harbor, NY Olcott Harbor, NY Oswego Harbor, NY Port Clinton, OH Rochester Harbor, NY Rocky River, OH Sandusky Harbor, OH Toledo Harbor, OH Vermilion Harbor, OH West Harbor, OH Wilson Harbor, NY Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys Other Authorized Navigation Projects Navigation Work Under Special Auth 20-2 20-2 20-3 20-3 20-3 20-4 20-5 20-5 20-5 20-6 20-6 20-6 20-7 20-7 20-7 20-8 20-8 20-8 20-9 20-9 20-9 20-10 20-10 20-10 20-11 20-11 20-11 20-11 20-12 20-12 SHORE PROTECTION 31. Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, PA 32. Other Authorized Shore Protection Proj 33. Shore Protection Proj Under Special Auth 20-12 20-13 20-13 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 20-1 34. Mt. Morris Lake, NY Genesee River 35. Inspection of Completed Flood Ctrl Projects 36. National Emergency Preparedness 37. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 38. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization URBAN STORM WATER MGMT 39. Onondaga Storm Water Discharge MISCELLANEOUS 40. Proj Modifications for Improvement of Environment 41. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration FUSRAP 42. Formerly Used Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 43. Deauthorized Projects GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 44. Surveys 45. Collection and Study of Basic Data 46. Preconstruction Engineering and Design (Not Fully Authorized) 47. Advance Engineering and Design (Fully Authorized) 20-13 20-13 20-13 20-13 20-13 20-14 20-14 20-15 20-15 20-15 20-15 20-15 20-15 20-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY98 NAVIGATION 1. ASHTABULA HARBOR, OH Location. On the south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Ashtabula River, 59 miles easterly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14836.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1963 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1593 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description see pgs. 1297-99 of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost of completed project is $12,240,147. Non-Federal costs of $5,743,000, including contribution of $47,000, were for construction of access roads, docks, storage and handling facilities and dockside dredging. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $47,000 for work authorized by 1936 and 1970 acts. Terminal Facilities. There are sixteen piers and wharves. One facility is owned by Coast Guard. Ten facilities are along banks of Ashtabula River and six are on south side of outer harbor. Eleven terminals have railroad connections and six have mechanical handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $20,206. Environmental activities cost $86,030. Real estate activities cost $14,814. $18,385 was expended on costs related to the repair of 20 1.f. of the west breakwater. $7,315 was expended on costs related to structure repairs. Supervision and administration of contracts cost $10,335. $191,721 was expended on the Ashtabula River Partnership effort. The partnership is comprised of local, private and government agencies to address remediation of contaminated sediments in the Harbor and Ashtabula River system. Effort continues for a Comprehensive Management Plan/ Environmental Impact Statement (CMP/EIS) regarding dredging and construction of a new Upland Disposal Facility for toxic and non-toxic sediments. 2. BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, NY Location. Improvement is essentially that of upper 13.5 miles of Niagara River from its head at Lake Erie, Buffalo, NY, to and including Tonawanda Harbor, NY. It comprises improvements formerly designated by three titles; viz, Lake Erie entrance to Black Rock Harbor and Erie Basin, NY, Black Rock Harbor and Channel, NY and Tonawanda Harbor and Niagara River, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14832.) Previous Projects. For details see items 5 and 7, pg. 1970 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1612 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description of existing project and Federally owned Black Rock ship lock, see pg. 1548 of Annual Report for 1962. Improvement of guide pier at Black Rock Lock, as authorized by 1935 act was deauthorized by Congress in Aug 1977. Cost for completed portion of new work is $10,457,093. Enlarging of existing 21-foot turning basin and deepening lower 1,500 feet of Tonawanda Inner Harbor from 16 to 21 feet, authorized by the 1954 act, was deauthorized by Congress in May 1981, and is excluded from foregoing cost. Non-Federal costs are estimated at $1,540,000 for costs incurred by NY State for construction of Erie Basin and protecting breakwater, and construction and extension of Bird Island Pier, and by other local interest for relocation of utilities. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for existing project. Contract for cost-shared recreation development at completed projects (Code 713 program) was executed by the NY State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY on Apr 16, 1985, and was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army and Chief of Engineers on May 3, 1985. Terminal Facilities. Two facilities are along the upstream end of the channel. Below Black Rock Lock and at Tonawanda Harbor there are 13 privately owned terminals. There are two State-owned barge canal terminals at Tonawanda, NY, and several marine service and supply docks for recreational and other small craft. The Corps owns a wharf adjacent to Black Rock Lock which is private. Ten terminals have railroad connections and six mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (Port Series No. 41, revised 1971, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Operation and care (Black Rock Lock): Lock was in operation 248 days and closed for annual winter maintenance from January 4, 1998 through May 1, 1998. Ordinary maintenance and repair of structures and grounds was accomplished throughout the year by the U.S. Derrickboat McCauley. Total costs of $4,274,097 were distributed as follows: Operation and care of lock, ordinary maintenance and repair and environmental compliance cost $647,185. Real estate activities, project condition sediment surveys, and 20-2 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT support of Water Control Center cost $124,624. Costs related to master plans were $61,723. $223,263 was expended for supervision and administration of contracts. $3,127,878 was expended for maintenance of the lock. Maintenance included rehabilitation of the upper east guide wall, the control houses, and the wharf wall. Gate painting costs were $42,983. $16,225 was expended on engineering and design work for the gate painting. Miscellaneous costs related to the operations of the lock were $30,216. 3. BUFFALO HARBOR, NY Location. At eastern end of Lake Erie, at head of Niagara River, 176 miles easterly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14820 and 14833.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1967 of Annual Report for 1915 and pg. 1606 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description see pg. 1368 of Annual Report for 1963. In addition, on Dec 15, 1980, OCE authorized the removal of bridge abutments of South Michigan Avenue Bridge. New work for completed project cost $18,837,601. Estimated non-Federal costs were $9,188,000 for deepening, widening, and improving Buffalo River and ship canal, constructing piers, retaining walls, and dikes and performing dock-side dredging. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are 27 piers, wharves, and docks of which five are on the Outer Harbor, nine are on the Lackawanna, Union, and Buffalo Ship Canals, and thirteen are located along the deep-draft section of the Buffalo River. Gateway Metroport, Division of Gateway Trade Center, Inc., owns and operates, for the former Bethlehem Steel Corp., wharves at Lackawanna for the receipt and shipment of general cargo and bulk commodities. Buildings of the former steel plant are utilized for transit and long-term storage of cargo as required. The Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority owns Terminals A and B in the Outer Harbor used for handling general cargo. Twenty terminals have railroad connections. The city of Buffalo owns a slip on the right bank of Buffalo River just north of Michigan Avenue Bridge for mooring the city fireboat. Coast Guard facilities are at the mouth of Buffalo River along the left bank. (See Port Series No. 41, revised 1991, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, condition sediment surveys, water control management and real estate activities cost $299,388. Environmental activities by contract and hired labor, cost $47,915. Costs for structure repairs were $60,983. $975,858 was expended to finalize the FY97 dredging contract. $46,895 was expended for supervision and administration of contracts. $13,823 was expended for the upgrading of the O&M manual. Miscellaneous costs related to dredging were $3,306. 4. BUFFALO HARBOR ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING Location: The eastern end of Lake Erie at the head of the Niagara River, 176 miles easterly from Cleveland, OH. Previous Projects: None Existing Project: An outer harbor, about 4-1/2 miles long and 1,600 feet wide, formed by a breakwater system, approximately parallel to the lake shore, 22,718 feet in length, with entrances near north and south ends and one confined disposal facility. A west breakwater 1,800 feet long located in Lake Erie protecting the north entrance. The inner harbor consists of a south pier at the mouth of the Buffalo River, about 5.8 miles of Federal Channel in the Buffalo River, and a 2-mile channel in the Buffalo Ship Canal. Local Cooperation: Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities: Operations and Results During FY: Maintenance: Miscellaneous project management $28,373. Buffalo District is preparing a decision document to address the use of Sect. 312 environmental dredging authority. 5. CATTARAUGUS HARBOR, NY Location. At mouth of Cattaraugus Creek on south shore of Lake Erie about 12 miles northeasterly from Dunkirk Harbor, NY and 24 miles southwesterly from Buffalo Harbor, NY (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14823.) Existing project. For details of the existing project, see page 32-4 of Annual Report for 1983. Construction was completed in January 1983. Total Federal cost of new work was $4,804,060. Total non-Federal cost for new work was $2,566,529, excluding $20,000 for lands. Existing project was authorized by 1968 R&H Act (H.Doc. 97, 90" Cong., 1st sess.) Local cooperation. See page 32-5 of Annual Report for 1976 for details of requirements of local cooperation. The cash contribution paid was $2,566,529. The State of New York executed local cooperation agreement in July 1981. 20-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY98 Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during FY. Maintenance: Environmental activities cost $19,772. 6. CLEVELAND HARBOR, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Cuyahoga River, 176 miles westerly from Buffalo, NY (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14839). Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1962, Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1585, Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description of existing project, as authorized through the 1966 modification, see pg. 1269 of Annual Report for 1967. Further improvements in the interest of commercial navigation and recreational navigation were authorized in the 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (PL 99-88). For details of the commercial navigation portion of the project, see pg. 20-4 of the Annual Report for 1995. For details of the recreational navigation portion of the project, see pg. 20-3 of Annual Report for 1994. The recreational navigation project was also authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) and the FY88 Energy and Water Appropriations Act (PL 100-202). These acts also authorized additional undefined improvements to Cleveland Harbor. A portion of the project was deauthorized by the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. Estimated total Federal cost of the existing project is $33,852,100 (Oct 1991) exclusive of undefined, inactive and deferred portions of the project. The amount of $29,315,100 is for completed work and the balance of $4,537,000 is for new work. Estimated non-Federal cost is $13,740,000 (Oct 1991) of which $9,203,000 is actual cost for completed work and the balance of $4,537,000 is required for work authorized by PL 99-88, PL 99-662, and PL 100-202. Remaining work authorized by 1946 River and Harbor Act, consisting of widening and deepening the right bank of Cuyahoga River at the downstream end of Cut 4, is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated Federal cost (1966) of this portion is $85,600 and non-Federal cost (1966) $5,000,000. Remaining work authorized by 1958 R&H Act, consisting of planning and replacement of bridges number 19 (E.L.R.R.) and 32 (B. & O.R.R.) and widening Cuyahoga and Old River channels, and remaining work authorized by the 1960 R&H Act, consisting of deepening the remainder of the Cuyahoga River from bridge number 1 to and including the Old River to a depth of 27 feet, has been classified as deferred and is also excluded from foregoing estimate. Estimated Federal cost (Oct 1976) of this portion is $18,033,300 and estimated non-Federal cost (Oct 1976) is $21,251,000. The 1989 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act (PL 101-101) authorized the Corps to begin a Reconnaissance study of the Cuyahoga River, to address the concerns of boat traffic congestion and related risks, accidents and safety of the public. Preliminary plans were studied to alleviate the commercial navigation problem and inadequate width and depth, in the Old and Cuyahoga Rivers. The cost of this Reconnaissance study was $250,000. The Reconnaissance Report recommended a feasibility study for one plan which has three structural features and the potential for yielding commercial (priority) outputs. The non-Federal sponsor did not commit to provide its total share of the cost of the feasibility phase of the study. Therefore, the study was reclassified as "inactive". See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. A confined disposal facility (CDF) (Dike 10B) was constructed adjacent to the Burke Lakefront Airport for containment of dredged material from Cleveland Harbor. The rubble mound structure was designed to hold material unsuitable for open-lake disposal. The sixty-eight (68) acre site should provide sufficient CDF capacity for approximately twenty years. The project was constructed with Federal O&M funds at a cost of $17,500,000 and was completed in 1998. Terminal Facilities. Fifty-one piers, wharves, and docks are situated in the Port of Cleveland. Eleven are located in the east and west basins of the outer harbor; 7 along the banks of the Old River and 17 and 16 along the right and left banks of the Cuyahoga River, respectively. Twenty-two terminals have both railroad connections and mechanical-handling facilities. The Corps owns a wharf at the foot of East 9th Street. The city of Cleveland owns and operates a wharf for mooring the city fireboat. U.S. Coast Guard vessels are moored east of the foot of 9th Street in the east basin. (See Port Series No. 43, revised 1989, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, condition sediment surveys, environmental activities, and real estate activities cost $354,903. $681,072 was expended to repair 357 l.f. of east breakwater, and east arrowhead. Approximately 334,818 cubic yards of shoaled material were removed from the Cuyahoga River, by contract, cost $2,988,691. Costs associated with Dike 14 were $37,549. $72,616 was expended to initiate 20-4 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT construction of Dock 20. Costs for the CDF Site 10B were $4,155,566. Additional CDF costs were $252,261. Supervision and administration of contracts cost $365,910. Engineering and design cost was $153,149. 7. CONNEAUT HARBOR, OH Location. On the south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Conneaut River, 73 miles easterly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14824.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1964, Annual Report for 1915. Existing Project. For description see pg. 1274 of Annual Report for 1967. Actual costs for new work for completed portion of the project were $7,541,369. For completed work, non-Federal costs were $200,000 for dockside dredging and removal of existing dolphins. The most southerly 300 feet of the 1,670 foot long shore arm, authorized by the R&H Act of 1910, was deauthorized Oct. 96. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Terminal Facilities. There are seven piers and wharves. Six are privately owned and operated and located in inner harbor. Remaining facility is city owned on the south side of outer harbor. Six terminals have railroad connections and four mechanical - handling facilities. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: $10,221 was expended for harbor surveys. $20,784 was expended on costs associated with dredging. Miscellaneous environmental activities and real estate activities cost $9,145. 8. DUNKIRK HARBOR, NY Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, 37 miles southwesterly from Buffalo, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14823.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1966 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1604 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description of completed portion of existing project see pg. 32-8 of Annual Report for 1976. For description of small boat harbor project as authorized under Section 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965, see pg. 32-8 of Annual Report for 1978. Actual costs for completed work are $3,010,024. Actual non-Federal costs are $1,961,000. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $46,542. $252,786 was expended to dredge 21,785 cubic yards of shoaled material. Environmental testing in support of dredging cost $28,662. Real estate activities cost $6,000. $11,643 was expended for supervision and administration of contracts. Miscellaneous costs related to breakwater maintenance was $1,500. $17,537 was expended on labor and management compliance associated with harbor activities. 9. ERIE HARBOR, PA Location. On southerly side of bay formed by Presque Isle Peninsula, on south shore of Lake Erie, 78 miles westerly from Buffalo, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14835.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1965 of Annual Report for 1915 and pg. 1600 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Projects. For description see pgs. 1363-64 of Annual Report for 1963. The FY93 Appropriations Act (PL102-377) authorized the planning, design and dredging of an access channel and berthing area. Entire project modification authorized by 1945 River and Harbor Act, providing for deepening channel and basin, both 23 feet deep, to Penn Central Company coal docks at westerly end of harbor, was deauthorized by Congress in Aug 1977. Actual costs for new work for completed portion of project were $2,860,906. Extension of north pier portion, authorized by 1899 Act was deauthorized in Nov 1981. A portion of work authorized by 1960 Act, deepening strips adjacent to north and south piers, was deauthorized in Aug 1982. Non- Federal costs for completed work were $51,000 for providing ore dock and dredging slip adjacent thereto. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Sixteen piers and wharves, of which twelve are privately owned and operated. Erie International Marine Terminal No. 1 owned by Port Commission, city of Erie, is along main waterfront on south side of Presque Isle Bay and Coast Guard facilities are on north side. Two offshore oil docks are on Lake Erie. Eight terminals have railroad connections and six mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) 20-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY98 Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $29,459. Environmental activities cost $14,692. Supervision and administration of contracts cost $21,168. Real estate activity cost $11,586. Engineering and design and preliminary assessments related to dredging cost $36,540. Removal of 111,939 cubic yards of shoaled material cost $422,366. $53,568 was expended on work being performed on the east canal basin. O&M manual revisions cost $9,772. $14,689 was expended on labor and miscellaneous management costs associated with harbor activities. 10. FAIRPORT HARBOR, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Grand River, 33 miles easterly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14837.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1963 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1590 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description of existing project, see pg. 1526 of Annual Report for 1962. Total Federal cost of $2,591,000 is actual cost for completed portion of project. Total non-Federal cost is $101,000 for bulkheads and dockside dredging for completed portion of project. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. See pg. 32-11 of 1976 Annual Report regarding assurances of local cooperation for work authorized by R&H Act of 1927. Terminal Facilities. Sixteen piers and wharves, all along banks of Grand River. One facility is owned by Coast Guard. Nine terminals have railroad connections and ten mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $30,396. Environmental studies in support of dredging cost $26,859. Finalization of the FY97 dredging contract cost $146,374. After dredge soundings cost $10,765. Supervision and administration of contracts cost $11,818. Real estate cost $7,428. Approximately 125 l.f. of the west breakwater was repaired by the U.S. Derrickboat McCauley at a cost of $253,916. $24,921 was expended on harbor borings. Labor and miscellaneous management costs were $14,207. 11. GREAT SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY Location. On Sodus Bay, which is a nearly landlocked indentation on south shore of Lake Ontario, 29 miles westerly from Oswego, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14814.) Previous Project. For details, see pg. 1972 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1526 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description, see pg. 1380 of Annual Report for 1963. Improvements authorized by 1962 act, consisting of deepening lake approach channel, entrance channel and inner approach channel were deauthorized by Congress in Aug 1977. Actual costs of new work for completed portion of project were $249,187. Costs incurred by local interests are not available. See Table 20-B for authorization legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Real estate cost $2,000. $7 was expended on operations supervision and administration. 12. HURON HARBOR, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Huron River, 47 miles westerly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14843.) Previous Project. For details, see pg. 1961 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1576 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description, see pg. 1347 of Annual Report for 1963 and pg. 32-12 of Annual Report for 1978. Cost of completed portion of existing project was $4,834,006. Construction of detached breakwater as authorized by 1962 R&H Act was deauthorized Jan 1, 1990. Non-Federal costs of $163,000 were incurred by local interests in 1963 for dockside dredging of areas between Federal improvement and terminal facilities. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Six privately owned wharves and docks, one along left bank of Huron River and remainder along right bank. Four terminals have railroad connections and four mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are regarded as adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $55,815. Environmental assessments, real estate activity, and economic studies 20-6 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT cost $83,250. Operations supervision and administration cost $19,576. Cost associated with the FY97 repair of the east outer end of the breakwater was $2,663. Approximately 146,207 cubic yards of shoaled material were dredged at a cost of $443,178. Supervision and administration of contracts cost $5,900. $15,942 was expended on the updating of the O&M manual. Coastal mapping costs were $9,764. Misc. costs associated with inspections, safety and labor were $14,692. 13. IRONDEQUOIT BAY, NY Location. On south shore of lake Ontario, 4 miles east of Rochester, NY at mouth of Irondequoit Creek, Monroe County, NY (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14804 and 14815). Existing Project. For details of existing project, see pg. 32-7 of Annual Report for FY87. Total estimated project cost is $15,363,000 (Oct 1994) including $3,582,000 Federal (which includes the COE $3,536,000 and the USCG $46,000) and $11,781,000 non-Federal, including a cash contribution of $2,661,000, lands and damages $290,000 and the cost of a movable highway bridge $8,830,000. Existing project was authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 332, 84th Cong., 2nd sess.). Local Cooperation. The Buffalo District has a Local Cooperation Agreement with New York State, executed April 20, 1983. Terminal Facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and Results During FY. Miscellaneous costs associated with harbor management were $341. 14. LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY Location. Little Sodus Bay, on south shore of Lake Ontario, 15 miles west of Oswego, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14803.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1973 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1628 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description see pg. 1378 of Annual Report for 1958. New work included a $1,287,528 contract for the rehabilitation of Little Sodus Bay East Breakwater. Approximately 1, 600 lineal feet of parallel steel sheet pile encasement was placed around the deteriorated existing concrete and wooden crib breakwater. The breakwater was capped off with a concrete walkway. Supervision and administration costs amounted to approximately $105,000. All costs incurred were Federal. Local Cooperation. Not required. Terminal Facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $8,969. Real estate expenses were $187. Finalization of FY97 east breakwater repairs were $189,363. 15. LORAIN HARBOR, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Black River, 25 miles westerly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14841.) Previous Projects. For details, see pg. 1961 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1580 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description see pgs. 1319-22 of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost of new work is $20,475,000. Deepening and widening remainder of Black River Channel at Cut 1 and construction of bank stabilization, authorized by 1960 Act and modified by 1965 Act was deauthorized Jan 1, 1990. A portion of work authorized by 1960 act, dredging of 15-to-25 foot wide strips adjacent to the U.S. East and West piers were also deauthorized Jan 1, 1990. Total non-Federal cost is $3,000 contributed by local interests towards construction of west shore arm. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. The Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986 (PL 99-662) authorized construction of commercial navigation improvements consisting of two bend cuts on the Black River to widen and straighten the channel between the Norfolk and Western Railroad Bridge and the 21st Street Bridge. These cuts are to be excavated to the existing channel depth of 27 feet. The authorized plan also includes widening the Upper Turning Basin at the existing depth of 21 feet. Estimated costs for this work are $2,290,000 Federal and $1,510,000 non-Federal (Oct 1989). This portion of the project has been classified deferred. On Mar 12, 1986, the Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbors Act, as amended, authorized construction of a small boat harbor which was completed in Jul 1987. The project consists of a 225-foot detached rubble mound breakwater and an 800-foot long rubble mound breakwater attached to the east breakwater shorearm in the east basin of the outer harbor. Construction costs for this project, including 20-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY98 supervision and administration, were $775,025 Federal and $775,025 non-Federal. Local Cooperation. For completed work, local interests contributed $3,000. Work authorized by 1960 Act (and modified by 1965 Act) is deauthorized. All other conditions fully complied with. On Mar 25, 1986, the city of Lorain, OH signed the Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA), for the Section 107 project. For details see pg. 32-7 of Annual Report for 1986. For details of LCA for deferred project authorized by the 1986 WRDA, see pgs. 32-9 of Annual Report for FY87. Terminal Facilities. There are 23 piers and wharves, of which three are on the outer harbor and the remainder are along banks of Black River. Two are owned by the city. Eight terminals have railroad connections and 15 mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $95,021. Environmental activities cost $91,891. Real estate activity cost $9,257. Repaired approximately 113 l.f. of the east and west breakwaters using the U.S. Derrickboat Simonsen at a cost of $487,376. Operations supervision and administration cost $15,870. Approximately 165,000 cubic yards of shoaled material were removed at a cost of $620,415. Miscellaneous costs related to repairs to the Lorain Lighthouse were $1,060. $18,218 was spent on coastal mapping. Required analysis, management compliance and labor associated with harbor activities cost $17,620. 16. NEW YORK STATE CANAL SYSTEM Location: The New York State Canal System runs primarily east-west through New York State. It consists of 4 components: Erie Canal; Oswego Canal; Cayuga/Seneca Canal; and Champlain Canal. Existing Project: Reimburse the State of New York 50% of non-Federal operation, maintenance and rehabilitation costs as well as make capital improvements. Existing project was authorized by Sec. 1105, WRDA 1986 and Sec. 553, WRDA 1996. Local Cooperation: Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities: Numerous piers, wharves and locks used for recreational craft. Operations and Results During FY: New work $44,413 was expended for Reconnaissance Report/Decision Document. 17. OAK ORCHARD, NY Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth of Oak Orchard Creek, 33 miles westerly of Rochester, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14805.) Previous Project. For details see pg. 628 of Annual Report for 1905. Existing Project. For description of completed existing project see pg. 32-14 of 1975 Annual Report. Actual Federal cost for completed project was $1,613,500. Estimated non-Federal cost is $270,000 (Jul 1971) including cash contribution of $170,700 and $54,002 for recreational facilities and remainder for lands and construction of wharf. Existing project was authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2nd sess.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $224,702. Terminal Facilities. There is no commercial navigation at Oak Orchard Harbor. Terminal facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft. Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Miscellaneous dredging costs were $1,787. Operations supervision and administration cost $704. 18. OLCOTT HARBOR, NY Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth of Eighteen Mile Creek, about 18 miles east of mouth of Niagara River and 63 miles by water west of Rochester, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14806.) Previous Project. For details see pg. 1971 of Annual Report for 1915 and pg. 1621 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description, see pg. 1555 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of new work for completed project was $1,500 exclusive of amount expended on previous projects, all of which was contributed by local interests. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. The authorized modification to the existing project consists of breakwaters to provide optimum harbor protection, a stone jetty and recreational fishing facilities including a foot bridge, walkways and guardrail, access facilities, sanitary facilities and parking areas. The estimated cost of the authorized modification is $17,300,000 (Oct 1991) of which $8,860,000 is Federal and $8,440,000 is non-Federal. Modification of the existing project was authorized by the 1986 Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) (PL 99-662). 20-8 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed project. Local interests contributed $1,500. Modifications authorized by the 1986 WRDA will require local interests to pay 50% of project cost including lands, easements, rights-of-way and dredge disposal areas. They are also responsible for construction of necessary docks and berthing spaces, construction of launching ramp, parking areas, sanitary facilities, and necessary access roads. After construction, non-Federal responsibilities would include fishing facility maintenance, except for the aids to navigation. Terminal Facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Environmental compliance assessments and related activities cost $2,451. Real estate costs were $5,000. Miscellaneous costs related to dredging totaled $1,336. 19. OSWEGO HARBOR, NY Locations. On South shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth of Oswego River, 59 miles easterly from Rochester, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14813.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1973 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1630 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description see pgs. 1383-84 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed portion of project cost $7,242,039 and non-Federal costs for completed work were $4,440,000 for lands, dockside dredging, construction of terminal wharves, and cargo handling facilities. Deepening a 200-foot wide strip along harbor line east of mouth of Oswego River, remaining feature of work authorized by the 1930 Act, was deauthorized Jan 1, 1990. Deepening to 22 feet a 150-foot wide strip along harbor line in west outer harbor, remaining feature of work authorized by 1940 Act, was deauthorized in May 1981. The portion of the Federal Channel from the southernmost alignment of the Route 68 bridge upstream to the northernmost alignment of Lake Street bridge authorized by the 1910 R&H Act as amended by the 1935 R&H Act, was deauthorized Oct 96. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are seven piers and wharves in the harbor and along the river channel. The Port of Oswego owns and operates a general cargo terminal at the mouth of the Oswego River. The Port Authority also operates a grain elevator west of the mouth of the river. The U.S. Coast Guard moors patrol and environmental research vessels west of the mouth of the river. Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $34,142. Environmental activities cost $8,661. $29,835 was expended on the finalization of the FY97 dredging contract. Supervision and administration of contracts cost $7,774. Miscellaneous harbor costs were $209. 20. PORT CLINTON HARBOR, OH Location: Comprises lower half-mile of Portage River. River empties into Lake Erie 72 miles westerly from Cleveland, OH (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14820). Existing Project. Provides for parallel jetties at river mouth and a channel in Lake Erie and Portage River with a project depth of 10 feet. For additional details, see pg. 1899 of Annual Report for 1951. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Terminal Facilities. There is one public fish dock, one private sand dock, one private fuel, lumber, and coal dock and five additional private docks. A dock at the foot of Madison Avenue is owned by the village of Port Clinton and open to the public. A shipyard builds small boats. Terminal facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $4,743. Real estate cost $6,000. Environmental activities cost $7,595. $20,676 was expended on coastal mapping. 21. ROCHESTER HARBOR, NY Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth of Genesee River, 59 miles westerly from Oswego, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14815.) Previous Project. For details see pg. 1471 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1623 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description see pg. 1556 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual cost for new work for completed project is $2,191,514. Non-Federal costs are estimated at $2,260,000, all for 1960 Act, for lands, relocation of submarine cable crossing, relocations of small docks and boathouses, dockside dredging, structure modifications, and replacement of Baltimore & OH coal loader. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Complied with except 20-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY98 provision for replacement of coal loading facility as required by River and Harbor Act of Jul 14, 1960. Terminal Facilities. There are 3 docks at Rochester Harbor. The city of Rochester owns an 830-foot long wharf at the entrance to the Genesee River. Three storage buildings at the terminal, formerly used as transit sheds, have approximately 100,000 square feet of storage space. Approximately 3 acres of open storage area is located at the upper end of the facility. The facility has not been used for handling cargo for over 10 years. The U.S. Coast Guard moors search and rescue vessels at the mouth of the Genesee River. Another private facility is located 1.6 miles above the Stutson Street Bridge. Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $9,969. Environmental testing, by contract cost $2,620. Real estate costs were $7,984. Supervision and administration of contracts cost $802. $11,060 was expended on misc. costs associated with dredging. 22. ROCKY RIVER HARBOR, OH Location. At mouth of Rocky River which empties into Lake Erie 7 miles westerly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14826.) Existing Project. For description see pg. 1329 of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost for completed project was $343.494 and non-Federal cost was a cash contribution of $249,346. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $249,346 for new work. Terminal Facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately-owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Real estate cost $3,000. Coastal mapping costs were $20,815. 23. SANDUSKY HARBOR, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, in southeastern portion of Sandusky Bay, 50 miles westerly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14845.) Previous Project. For description see pgs. 1511-12 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual costs for new work for completed project were $6,250,121, excluding $325,000 contributed by local interests. Non-Federal costs for completed project are estimated at $675,000, including $325,000 cash contribution and the remaining $350,000 is for dockside dredging adjacent to deepening channels authorized by 1960 Act. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $325,000 for new work. Terminal Facilities. Fourteen piers and wharves, three at west end of harbor and remainder along dock channel. One is a base for State-owned fish research and patrol boats. One publicly owned and six privately owned used for mooring fishing boats and recreational craft and for ferry service. Five terminals have railroad connections and five mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $65,387. Environmental activities cost $3,114. Real estate cost $4,035. Supervision and administration of contracts cost $50,515. 188,855 cubic yards of shoaled material were dredged at a cost of $616,044. Coastal mapping cost $17,380. Initial appraisals, investigation studies and labor associated with harbor activities cost $31,688. 24. TOLEDO HARBOR, OH Location. Comprises lower 7 miles of Maumee River and channel through Maumee Bay to Lake Erie. Maumee River has its source in northern Indiana and empties into Lake Erie. Harbor is at the westerly end of Lake Erie, 99 miles westerly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14847.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1959 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1565 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description of existing project see pgs. 32-18 and -19 of Annual Report for 1978. Cost of completed existing project was $15,567,147. See table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Thirty-five piers, wharves and docks are located in the Port of Toledo. Seven are located on Maumee River; and 28 are equally divided along the right and left banks of the lower 7 miles of the Maumee River. The Toledo-Lucas County Port Authority Facility No. 1 Wharf handles conventional and containerized general cargo as well as an increasing amount of miscellaneous bulk materials. Fifteen of the terminals have railroad connections and mechanical handling facilities. (See Port Series No. 44, revised 1989, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Harbor surveys and inspections cost $244,911. $43,446 was expended for environmental and 20-10 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT economic studies. Real estate cost $8,596. Costs to continue the Long-Term Management Strategy were $445,401. Removal of 1,160,529 cubic yards of shoaled material from the Maumee Bay Channel cost $2,447,390. Supervision and administration of contracts cost $107,848. Engineering and design cost $850. $9,141 was expended on the O&M manual updates. Labor associated with harbor activities cost $20,729. 25. VERMILION HARBOR, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Vermilion River, 37 miles westerly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14826.) Existing Project. For description of existing project see pgs. 32-17 and 32-18 of Annual Report for 1975. Actual Federal cost for the completed existing project was $1,156,118. Estimated non-Federal cost for new work is $754,679 including cash contribution of $740,679 and remainder for relocation of submarine cable and construction of public wharf. See Table 20- B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $740,679. Terminal Facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. A reconnaissance study to alleviate the ice-jam and free-flow flooding of the river was completed in 1986 at a cost of $180,000. The proposed project was an ice-retention structure. The non-Federal sponsor did not commit to provide its total share of the cost of the feasibility study; the project was therefore reclassified as "inactive". Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $548. Real estate $3,000. Coastal maps costs were $20,691. Inspections and misc. harbor activities cost $843. 26. WEST HARBOR, OH Location. On southwest shore of Lake Erie, 13 miles northwest of Port Clinton, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14847.) Existing Project. For description of existing project, see page 32-10 of Annual Report for 1983. Total Federal cost for new work was $3,303,898. Total non-Federal cost for new work was $3,922,000 including cash contribution of $3,795,000. Existing project was authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 245, 88th Cong., 2nd sess.) Local Cooperation. See pg. 32-20 of 1978 Annual Report for requirements of local cooperation. By letter dated Jan 31, 1978, State of OH stated its intent to furnish assurances of local cooperation, and executed LCA was received on Mar 9, 1981. Terminal Facilities. Commerce at the harbor presently consists of recreational boating and affiliated activities. Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $13,402. Supervision and administration of FY97 the contract cost $177,512. Real estate activity cost $3,000. Coastal mapping cost $20,551. 27. WILSON HARBOR, NY Location. At mouth of east branch of Twelve Mile Creek, which enters Lake Ontario 12 miles easterly of mouth of Niagara River, and 67 miles westerly of Rochester Harbor, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14806.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 2395 of Annual Report for 1889, and pg. 628 of Annual Report for 1905. Existing Project. For description of existing project see pg. 32-18 of Annual Report for 1975. Actual Federal cost for completed existing project was $477,904. Estimated non-Federal costs are $774,000 which includes cost of $16,000 for previously completed work. Remainder of non-Federal costs are for work required for 1968 R&H Act including cash contribution of $166,988. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $671. Real estate cost $3,000. Supervision and administration of contracts cost $905. Miscellaneous costs associated with dredging were $6,597. 28. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Condition surveys were performed by the Buffalo District at a cost of $169,847. Miscellaneous costs and real estate costs were $9,251. Remaining costs for reconnaissance and condition surveys are reported in individual project writeups. 20-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY98 Project Date of Survey Barcelona, NY Sep 1998 Cattaraugus, NY Jul 1998 Great Sodus, NY Sep 1998 Little Sodus, NY Sep 1998 Niagara River, NY Dec 1997 Ogdensburg, NY Sep 1998 Olcott, NY Sep 1998 Oswego, NY Sep 1998 Port Clinton, OH May 1998 Port Ontario, NY Sep 1998 29. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 20-C. 30. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION ROCHESTER WAVE SURGE Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario at mouth of Genesee River, 59 miles westerly from Oswego, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14815). Existing Project. Project was approved for construction by the Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbors Act, as amended, as authorized by the 1990 Water Resources Development Act. The recommended plan of improvement consists of a partial segmented rubble mound lining of the interior walls of the existing piers. Total estimated Federal cost of the project is $3,850,000. Total estimated non-Federal cost is $3,850,000. Local Cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement was executed with the local sponsor, the City of Rochester, on Feb 27, 1996. Operations and Results During FY. New Work: FY98 Federal costs were $6,224 for real estate activities, $10,000 for construction contract, $18,589 for contract supervision and administration and $16,804 for in-house engineering effort. Non-Federal costs were $29,116 for contract supervision and administration, $14,826 for engineering & design and $65 for operating manual. Navigation work pursuant to Section 107. Public Law 86-645. Lake Erie, Cooley Canal, Lucas Co., OH - Federal costs of $109,833 and non-Federal costs of $138,187 were incurred for preauthorization studies. Section 107 Coordination Account - Federal costs of $5,218 were incurred for preauthorization studies. Buffalo Inner Harbor, Buffalo, NY - Federal costs of $1,304 were incurred for preauthorization studies. SHORE PROTECTION 31. PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA, ERIE, PA Location. At Erie, PA., on south shore of Lake Erie, 78 miles southwest of Buffalo, NY and 102 miles eastnortheast of Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14824 and 14835.) Existing Project. For description of completed portion of existing project see pg. 1393 of Annual Report for 1963. For details of project authorized by the 1974 Water Resources Development Act (WRDA), 1976 WRDA and 1986 WRDA, see pg. 32-14 of Annual Report for FY87. Actual Federal cost for the authorized beach nourishment project modifications through FY92 is $16,879,000 which includes $5,646,000 for completed work authorized by the 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and 1974 WRDA Act and $11,233,000 for completed work authorized by the 1976 WRDA Act. Actual non-Federal cost for the authorized project and modifications through FY92 is $8,798,000 which includes $3,983,000 for completed work authorized by 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and 1974 WRDA Act and $4,815,000 for completed work authorized by the 1976 WRDA Act. Beach nourishment as authorized by the 1976 WRDA was completed in FY91. The estimated Federal cost (Oct 1998) for the 55 breakwater project is $58,085,000. This estimate includes $13,435,000 for the initial construction and $44,650,000 for 50 years of postconstruction beach nourishment. The estimated non- Federal cost (Oct 1998) for the breakwater project is also $58,085,000. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed project as authorized by 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and 1974 WRDA Act. An agreement between the United States of America and the Commonwealth of PA, acting through the Department of Environmental Resources was entered into on Feb 21, 1979 for the annual nourishment which was extended by the 1976 WRDA Act. A Local Cooperation Agreement between the United States of America and the local sponsor for construction of the 58 breakwater project was executed by the Secretary of the Army on Jun 22, 1989. See pg. 20-10 of Annual Report for FY89 for details of local cooperation. 20-12 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT Operations and Results During FY. New Work: Annual nourishment for a fifty-year period, beginning in FY93, continued in FY98 for the seventh year of this fifty-year period. Federal expenditures were $445,287 for the nourishment contract, $12,388 for contract supervision and administration and $51,711 for inhouse engineering and design and $65 for real estate. Non-Federal costs were $450,300 for the nourishment contract, $19,582 for contract supervision and administration, and $47,571 for in-house engineering and design. 32. OTHER AUTHORIZED SHORE PROTECTION PROJECTS See Table 20-D. 33. SHORE PROTECTION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Shore Protection Work Pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874. County Route 127, Hamburg, NY - Federal costs of $4,022 were incurred for preauthorization studies. Lake Erie at Painesville, OH - Federal costs of $23,712 were incurred for preauthorization studies. Lake Erie, Athol Springs, Hamburg, NY - Federal costs of $14,665 were incurred for preauthorization studies. FLOOD CONTROL 34. MT. MORRIS LAKE, GENESEE RIVER, NY Location. Dam is on Genesee River 66.9 miles above river mouth and about 32 miles southwesterly of Rochester, NY. Reservoir is in Livingston and Wyoming Counties, NY. (See ecological Survey maps of Nunda and Portage, NY). Existing Project. For description of existing project, as authorized by 1944 Flood control Act, see pg. 1575 of Annual Report for 1962. New work for completed project cost $23,365,559. In addition, $5,000 contributed funds were expended for new work. Local Cooperation. None required. Local interests contributed $5,000 for new work. Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Operation of the dam, reservoir and service facilities, condition and operation studies, real estate activities and miscellaneous reports, were accomplished by hired labor at a cost of $312,241. Operation of the Water Control Center cost $257,868. $1,149,251 was expended to continue converting an existing building to a Visitor Center (completed interior construction and exhibits). Maintenance costs for the dam were $295,760. Repairs included debris removal, bank stabilization and removal of debris, and stair replacement within the dam. E&D to stabilize the access road embankment. 35. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed flood control works for compliance with Federal requirements were made during the period at a cost of $209,563. This includes updating the hydraulics and hydrology of various local flood control projects. Total cost to Sep 30, 1997 is $2,797,212. 36. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FY97 costs were $100,211. 37. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 20-E. 38. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies (Public Law 89, 84th Congress, as amended by Sec. 206 of Flood Control Act of 1962). FY98 costs for the Disaster Preparedness Program were $271,199. Costs to support Emergency Operations totaled $103,168 for activities related to Winter and Spring flood fighting in Central and Northern NY and Northern OH. These activities included flood reconnaissance, liaison activities and providing technical advice to local response agencies in flood flight operations. Program activities included inhouse program administration, project inspection activities and the purchase and transportation of flood protection materials. FY98 costs for the Emergency Rehabilitation Program totaled $1,236,838 and 20-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 98 included rehabilitation of Federal flood control projects at Cayuga Inlet, Ithaca, NY, and Genesee River and Dyke Creek, NY. Costs for Advance Measures assistance were $1,137,282. SWAN CREEK, TOLEDO, OH Location. Swan Creek is located at Toledo, OH, at the westerly end of Lake Erie, 99 miles westerly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14847). Existing Project. Project was approved for construction by the Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended, on May 15, 1991. The project provides for construction of approximately 3,100 feet of a combination levee and flood wall system along the left bank of Swan Creek, extending from the Detroit Avenue Bridge, downstream to the South Avenue Bridge. In addition, a 540-foot long section of the Creek will be relocated about 75 feet. Total estimated Federal cost of the project is $1,950,000. Total estimated non-Federal cost is $650,000. Local Cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement was executed with the local sponsor, the City of Toledo, on Aug 30, 1991 and requires the local sponsor to provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas and relocations and make contributions up to 25% of the total project cost. Operations and Results During FY. New Work: FY98 Federal costs were $830 for in-house engineering and design effort. Cazenovia Creek, NY - A cost of $120,145 was incurred for preauthorization studies. Chagrin River, Eastlake, OH - A cost of $12,470 was incurred for preauthorization studies. Cross Lake, NY - A cost of $17,395 Federal and $21,921 non-Federal was incurred for preauthorization studies. Irondequoit Creek, Penfield, NY - A cost of $6,721 was incurred for preauthorization studies. Oneida Creek, Oneida, NY - A cost of $674 was incurred for preauthorization studies. Section 205 Coordination Account - A cost of $20,439 was incurred for preauthorization studies. Vermilion River, OH - A cost of $12,980 was incurred for preauthorization studies. West Branch Limestone Creek, Manlius, NY - A cost of $699 was incurred for preauthorization studies. URBAN STORM WATER MGMT 39. ONONDAGA STORM WATER DISCHARGE, NY Location. Onondaga Lake is located in Central NY State, northwest of the city of Syracuse, within the Oswego River Basin, which is tributary to Lake Ontario. It is also part of the NY State Barge Canal System. (See Geological Survey map of Syracuse, NY.) Existing Project. Existing project is authorized under Section 307 of the Waters Resources Development Act of 1992 (P.L. 102-580) and will demonstrate the effectiveness of using swirl concentrator system technology for combined Sewer Overflow abatement at Hiawatha Boulevard to improve water quality in Onondaga Lake. The project has three separate components: interceptor sewers; a treatment and storage facility; and outfall pipe and force main which will be designed and constructed by others. Federal cost will $3,645. Non-Federal cost is estimated to be $3,715. Local Cooperation. The project will be cost-shared 75% Federal, 25% non-Federal up to the maximum Federal contribution ($4,000,000). Operations and Results During FY. New Work: Federal costs for FY 98 were $23,470 for real estate activities, a credit of $13,149 for in-house engineering effort, $435,000 for contract activities, $4,580 for reconnaissance effort and $136,132 for supervision and administration of the contract. Non-Federal costs were $145,117 for in-house engineering effort and $9,316 for supervision and administration of the contract. MISCELLANEOUS 40. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT Project Modification work pursuant to Section 1135, Public Law 99-62. Coordination Account Funds - Funds in the amount of $5,158 were spent on preauthorization investigations. Initial Appraisals - Funds in the amount of $14,355 were incurred for preauthorization studies. 20-14 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT 41. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION Ecosystem Restoration pursuant to Section 206, P.L 104-303. Coordination Account Funds - Funds in the amount of $2,362 were spent on preauthorization investigations. Preliminary Restoration Plans - Funds in the amount of $1,999 were spent on preauthorization investigations. FUSRAP 42. FORMERLY USED SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM (FUSRAP) Programmatic funds were expended on projects as follows: Niagara Falls Storage Site, Lewiston, NY - $865,980 Ashland 1, Tonawanda, NY $395,998 Ashland 2. Tonawanda, NY $10,691,877 Praxair (Linde Air Products), Tonawanda, NY - $8,991,288 Seaway Industrial Park, NY - $329,284 Bliss and Laughlin Steel, Buffalo, NY - $191,512 Luckey, OH - $3,286,967 Painesville, OH - $1,263,611 Oakridge Transition, Oakridge, TN - $98,090 DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 43. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS See Table 20-I. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 44. SURVEYS During FY98, $383,845 was expended for surveys. These costs are shown below: Navigation Studies Flood Damage Prevention Studies Shoreline Protection Studies Special Studies Miscellaneous Investigations Coordination Studies 41,341 27,7751 'Does not include $15,350 contributed funds. 45. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the period, costs of $118,760 were incurred in connection with International Water Studies under the General Investigations appropriation and $793,229 incurred under the Operations and Maintenance appropriation for a total cost of $911,989. Flood plain management services were performed during the year at a Federal cost of $141,667. During the year, flood hazard elevation studies were performed for Tannery Brook, NY, Big Sister Creek, NY, Skaneateles Creek, NY, Croghan Dam and Willoughby Hills, OH. The results of these studies will enable local officials to encourage and enforce prudent use of the identified flood plains. Also, hundreds of technical assistance requests regarding flood plain matters were completed during the year responding to individuals, corporations, real estate companies, insurance agents, engineering firms and local agencies. Costs for General Hydrologic Studies were $4,949. 46. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (NOT FULLY AUTHORIZED) FY98 Federal costs were $58,518 for PED effort on the Onondaga Lake, NY demonstration projects. These demonstration projects will be constructed by others. 47. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (FULLY AUTHORIZED) Costs during the period were $80,428 for Advance Engineering and Design projects. For details of project, see section 17 in text. $187,377 30,079 0 97,272 20-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 98 TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Project Text 1. Ashtabula Harbor, OH 2. Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib.Funds) 3. Buffalo Harbor, NY 4. Buffalo Harbor, NY Environmental Dredging 5. Cattaraugus Harbor, NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 6. Cleveland Harbor, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 7. Conneaut Harbor, OH 8. Dunkirk Harbor, NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib.Funds) Funding New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost Rehab. Approp. Rehab. Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost New Work Contrib. New Work Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost Rehab. Approp. Rehab. Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost Rehab. Approp. Rehab. Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost Rehab. Approp. Rehab. Cost New Work Contrib. New Work Cost Maint. Contrib. Maint. Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost Rehab. Approp. Rehab. Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost New Work Contrib. New Work Cost FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 340,000 544,925 1,805,000 1,791,596 510,000 571,662 2,300 1,714 3,351,000 3,217,508 150,000 119,360 1,005,000 1,000,123 364,000 359,055 390,600 393,325 3,591,548 3,546,506 611,850 613,471 17,411 18,008 5,390,500 5,440,472 1,127,000 158,089 661,150 649,436 349,800 262,101 420,500 428,465 - 3,491,845 3,507,832 1,198,891 1,151,193 240 14,615,585 14,427,160 26,314 72,904 176,752 240,818 Total Cost to FY 98 Sept 30, 1998 359,370 348,806 4,246,500 4,274,097 1,388,869 1,448,168 123,000 28,373 19,772 19,772 9,695,600 9,061,717 47,200 40,150 367,900 364,669 12,805,339' 12,805,339' 17,270,645 17,591,007 6,077,000 6,077,000 11,135,1202 11,135,1202 60,541,2813 60,443,3633 620,000 620,000 23,115,1874 23,115,1874 64,838,3035 63,405,0645 295,457 295,457 123,000 28,373 4,804,060 4,804,060 317,720 317,711 2,566,529 2,566,529 36,550,2996 36,550,2996 205,212,2687 204,303,3797 16,404,903 16,404,903 1,083,178 1,083,178 1,277,000 277,449 8,346,6418 8,346,6418 14,246,5219 14,239,4739 651,850 651,850 3,010,02410 3,010,02410 4,715,841 4,683,653 1,950,000" 1,950,000" 20-16 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 20-A COST Ar See Section in Project Text Funding ND FINANCIAL STATEMENT FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Total Cost to FY 98 Sept. 30,1998 9. Erie Harbor, PA 10. Fairport Harbor, NY New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost Rehab. Approp. Rehab. Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost 878,000 5,449,736 -689,605 519,631 899,173 3,999,053 340,40 613,84 1,15 1,15 - - -5 51,440 461,800 2,187,663 324,30 51,286 329,964 2,022,725 526,68 - 3,597,87312 - 3,597,87312 0 23,646,801'3 2 23,622,60813 4 1,154 4 1,154 - 2,959,61114 - 2,959,611', 0 20,555,082 5 20,460,014 20-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY98 TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 11. Great Sodus Bay Harbor, NY 12. Huron Harbor, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 13. Irondequoit Bay, NY (Contrib. Funds) 14. Little Sodus Bay Harbor, NY 15. Lorain Harbor, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 16. NYS Canal System 17. Oak Orchard Harbor, NY 18. Olcott Harbor, NY 19. Oswego Harbor. NY Funding New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost Rehab. Approp. Rehab. Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost Rehab. Approp. Rehab. Cost New Work Contrib. New Work Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost New Work Contrib. New Work Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost Rehab. Approp. Rehab. Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost New Work Contrib. New Work Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab.Approp. Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost Rehab.Approp. Rehab. Cost FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 211,000 223,101 2,642 2,790 196,000 361,960 600 4,444 1,682,400 1,684,221 318,599 297,619 1,226,875 1,229,989 230,567 219,860 456 2,334.900 2,089,375 -15,165 5,841 789,311 815,841 23,356 23,104 1,283,713 1,280,153 869,026 1,164,182 2,000 2,007 681,900 650,780 341 186,200 198,520 610,959" 610,959" 2,906,107 2,906,107 713,544 713,544 5,103,79516 5,103,79516 22,169,490 22,138,305 247,030 247,030 63,079 63,079 3,535,651 3,535,651 651,162 651,145 2,718,077 2,718,077 301,39417 301,394" 5,590,707 5,587,991 742,822 742,822 - 22,240,67018 - 22,240,67018 1,590,930 37,964,149 1,356,728 37,728,064 845,551 845,551 - - 378,000 - - 44,413 - - -. 563 161,063 -22,600 573 135,949 2,491 11,000 9,141 47,000 8,981 3,223 3,005 4,735 439,901 413,563 531,926 573,323 8,051 16,239 57,700 80,622 378,000 44,413 1,586,99619 1,586,99619 580,920 580,897 2,025,21020 1,753,98720 686,71721 694,77321 14,47722 14,47722 8,430,01623 8,430,01623 8,893,94624 8,893,85824 307,590 307,590 20-18 Total Cost to FY 98 Sept 30, 1998 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project Funding Total Cost to FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sept 30, 1998 20. Port Clinton Harbor, OH 21. Rochester Harbor, NY New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost 999,000 33,030 998,734 38,057 20-19 19,997 17,979 878,023 863,718 39,014 39,014 17,804 32,435 71,950 71,950 1,073,980 1,071,954 2,439,30825 2,439,30825 23,957,521 23,957,452 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 98 TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 22. Rocky River Harbor, OH 23. Sandusky Harbor, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 24. Toledo Harbor, OH 25. Vermilion Harbor, OH 26. West Harbor, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 27. Wilson Harbor, NY 28. Lake Erie, Sturgeon Pt., NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 29. Rochester Hbr., NY (Wave Surge) (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 30. Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, PA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 31. Mt. Morris Lake, NY Genesee River Funding New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost Rehab. Approp. Rehab. Cost Maint. Contrib. Maint. Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost Rehab. Approp. Rehab. Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost New Work Contrib. New Work Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost New Work Contrib. New Work Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost New Work Contrib. New Work Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost New Work Contrib. New Work Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 385,000 344,925 1,643,000 1,842,703 5,142,000 4,505,181 200,000 181,417 29,168 69,245 109,100 109,756 2,257,000 2,973,534 152,423 159,235 12,188 12,188 706,616 708,753 2,395,459 2,400,139 44,835 56,864 290,548 128,018 - - 5,932 223,977 5,960 221,701 56,000 53,955 10,360 10,273 -57,850 -53,955 520,000 634,872 313,451 428,295 420,583 426,458 2,014,628 2,055,536 20-20 -24,200 6,552 6,640 3,190,000 714,748 750,000 461,518 450,036 452,010 450,000 441,364 1,772,300 1,786,848 -560 533,572 3,254,292 787,918 659,000 641,682 685,000 637,389 2,562,880 2,464,985 Total Cost to FY 98 Sept 30, 1998 23,815 23,815 834,000 788,162 343,494 343,494 3,111,614 3,111,614 6,727,27027 6,727,27027 22,636,533 22,589,914 675,606 675,606 15,445 15,445 - 17,191,84228 - 17,191,84228 4,192,300 119,739,652 3,328,312 118,856,543 25,044 25,081 58,351 214,465 9,671 11,843 13,000 12,849 51,617 -1,000,000 44,008 500,000 509,500 474,000 517,453 2,036,000 2,015,118 1,156,11830 1,156,11830 2,860,916 2,860,909 139,775 139,775 3,303,898 3,303,898 1,992,296 1,985,877 3,795,000 3,795,000 535,2463' 535,24631 962,216 962,092 1,718,70033 1,718,14033 70,416 70,264 1,299,008 1,299,008 4,000,000 2,092,929 3,004,292 1,293,444 33,087,049 33,068,162 4,978 4,978 23,889,867 23,863,894 23,365,5593 23,365,559" 29,198,051 28,930,105 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Total Cost to FY 98 Sept 30, 1998 32. Swan Creek Toledo, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 33. Onondaga Storm Water Discharge, NY (Federal Funds) New Work Approp. New Work Cost New Work Contrib. New Work Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost New work contrib. Cost 1,176,600 14,000 1,378,414 251,500 447,269 1,683,000 60,292 17,145 338,305 31,000 19,035 - 1,994,615 830 1,978,608 - 513,500 - 513,500 567,284 586,033 - 3,691,500 - 154,433 3,406,000 1,563,376 3,691,500 154,433 1. Includes $565,192 for previous projs. Excludes $47,000 contributed funds. 2. Includes $58,027 for previous projs. 3. Includes $4,922 emergency relief authority administrative costs transferred for new work to maintenance upon conversion to programming & budgeting system Jul 1, 1953, by direction of Office, Chief of Engineers. Also includes appropriations & costs under appropriation titles 96X3123 Operations and Maintenance & 96X5125 Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 4. Includes $4,277,586 for previous projs. Excludes expenditures of $239,305 for work authorized by Sec. 107. 5. Includes $1,883,647 for previous projs. Excludes $446,805 contributed funds. 6. Includes $1,564,154 for previous proj. & appropriations & costs of $16,596 for modification authorized for construction under authority of Sec. 107, 1960 R&H Act. 7. Includes appropriations & costs under appropriation titles 96x3123 Operations and Maintenance & 96x5125 Maintenance and Operations of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. Excludes $201,960 contributed funds. 8. Includes $805,272 for previous projs. 9. Includes $39,784 for previous projs. 10. Includes $811,250 for previous projs. Excludes $11,000 contributed funds. 11. Includes $176,520 for previous projs. 12. Includes $736,967 for previous projs. 13. Includes $104,900 for previous projs. Excludes $154,500 contributed funds. 14. Includes $368,940 for previous projs. 15. Includes $361,722 for previous projs. 16. Includes $269,789 for previous projs. 17. Includes $232,328 for previous projs. 18. Includes $292,203 for new work for previous projs. Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. Also excludes appropriation and cost of $29,570 under authority of Sec. 107, 1960 R&H Act. 18. Excludes $224,702 contributed funds. 19. Excludes $224,702 contributed funds. 20. Includes $140,210 for previous projs. Excludes $1,500 contributed funds. 21. Includes $38,959 for previous projs. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 22. Excludes $186,000 Public Works Acceleration Act. 23. Includes $1,187,977 for previous projs. 24. Includes $945,684 for previous projs. 25. Includes $247,794 for previous projs. 26. Includes $617,529 for previous projs & $478 emergency relief authority administration costs transferred from new work to maintenance upon conversion to programming and budgeting system, Jul 1, 1953, by direction of Office, Chief of Engineers. 27. Includes $477,149 for previous projs. Excludes $325,000 contributed funds. 28. Includes $1,624,695 for previous projs. 29. Includes $16,914 for previous projs. 30. Excludes $740,679 contributed funds. 31. Includes $57,342 for previous projs. Excludes $166,998 contributed funds. 32. Includes $16,914 for previous projects. 33. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 34. Includes study costs of $117,000 under authority Sect. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act. Excludes $17,493 in contributed costs. 20-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 98 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Jun 3, 1896 Work Authorized ASHTABULA HARBOR, OH Construction of breakwater. Mar 3, 1905 Enlarge outer harbor by extending west breakwater and Jun 25, 1910 constructing new east breakwater pierheads on lakeward ends of breakwaters; remove part of old east breakwater. Mar 2, 1919 Extend west breakwater to shore; dredge outer harbor to a depth of 20 feet. Aug 30, 1935 Remove portion of east breakwater to, extend breakwaters to present dimensions and dredging restrictions in portion of west basin. Aug 26, 1937 Dredge channel through outer harbor, channel of approach to Penn Central Co. slip, channel Ashtabula River, to and in turning basin all to present project dimensions; remove portion of old east inner breakwater and maintenance to 24-foot depth of portion of outer harbor. Mar 2, 1945 Extend river channel to present project limit. Sep 3, 1954 Dredging approach channel and turning basin in east outer harbor 25-foot depth. Jul 14, 1960 A depth of 29 feet in soft and 30 feet in hard material in entrance channel to just inside outer ends of breakwaters, thence 28 feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in a channel to inner breakwater, thence 27 feet in soft and 28 feet in hard materials in a channel extending to Penn Central Co. slip and extending 2000 feet up Ashtabula River, 22 feet in hard material in turning area; and 28 feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in areas adjacent to 250-foot section of inner breakwater when that section is removed as now authorized. Oct 27, 1965 Dredging approach, channel and turning basin in east outer harbor to 28 feet in soft material and 29 feet in hard material. BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, NY Aug 11, 1888 Dredging channel through horseshoe reef at outlet of Lake Erie Jun 3, 1896 and Tonawanda Inner Harbor to 16 feet. Jun 13, 1902 Deepening Tonawanda Creek to 16 feet. Jun 13, 1902 Dredging channel from Buffalo outer harbor to foot of Maryland Aug 8, 1917 St., Buffalo, to 21 feet. Mar 3, 1905 Dredging channel from foot of Maryland St., Buffalo, to natural deep water pool upstream from Tonawanda Harbor to 21 feet; construction of ship lock and bridge; and repair of Bird Island pier towpath wall. TABLE 20-B See Section 20-22 Documents Annual Report, 1895, p. 2132 H. Doc. 654. 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 997, 64th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 43, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 78, 74th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 321, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 486, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 148, 86th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 269, 89th cong., Ist sess. 4 H. Ex. Doc. 83, 50th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1888, p.2066, and Annual Report, 1897, pp. 3116-3120. H. Doc. 143, 56th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report, 1900 p.4152. H. Doc. 125, 56th Cong., 2nd sess., and Annual Report 1901, p.3343. H. Doc. 428, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Jul 27, 1916 Mar 2, 1919 Mar 2, 1945 Sep 22, 1922 Mar 3, 1925 Work Authorized Dredging channel along Tonawanda Island, with turning basin at its downstream end at the foot of the Island, to 21 feet. Dredging triangular area at junction with Buffalo north entrance channel. Widening channel at foot of Maryland St., Buffalo. Widening canal south of International Bridge and removal of westerly end of Rattlesnake Island shoal. Jun 26, 1934 s Operation and care of improvements provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Aug 30, 19356 Removal of rock shoals in Lake Erie entrance to canal, and in canal south of Ferry Street Bridge, to 22 feet; enlargement of North Tonawanda turning basin; extension of Bird Island Pier Improvement of guide pier at the lock; and elimination of upper 150 feet of Tonawanda Creek channel from the project.7 Mar 2, 1945 Widening Lake Erie entrance to canal. Sep 3, 1954 Deepen lower 1,500 feet of Tonawanda inner harbor and enlarge turning basin. May 20, 1826 Jun 23, 1866 Jun 23, 1874 Jun 3, 1896 Mar 3, 1899 Mar 3, 1909 Jun 6, 1900 Jun 13, 1902 Mar 2, 1907 BUFFALO HARBOR, NY Construction of south pier (extended in 1868)9. Construction of old breakwater.9 Extension of old breakwater.9 Stony Point and south breakwater.9 TABLE 20-B See Section 2 North breakwater.9 Deepening entrance channel to inner harbor and removing rock shoal therein. Dredging at entrance to canals at South Buffalo in outer harbor.' Mar 2, 190710 South entrance breakwater. 9 Jun 25, 1910 Extension of Federal project to Commercial St. and removal of Watson elevator site.9 Jul 25, 1912 Deepening areas A, B, D, in outer harbor to 21 feet, C in north entrance to 23 feet. Mar 2, 1919 Deepening areas F and G in outer harbor to 21 feet. Specified in acts. Specified in act. H. Doc. 240, 59th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 298, Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 550, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 1139, 64th Cong. 1st sess. 20-23 Documents H. Doc. 658, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 1004, 65th Cong., 2"d sess. and H. Doc. 92, 79th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 981, 66th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 289, 68th Cong.,lst sess. H. Doc. 28, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 92, 79th Cong., 1st sess.4 H. Doc. 423, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. 4'8 Annual Report, 1868, pp. 222 and 232. Annual Report, 1868, pp. 232 and 236. Annual Report, 1876, pt. 2, pp. 569 and 573. Annual Report, 1895, p. 3153. H. Doc. 72, 55th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1897, p. 3245. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY98 TABLE 20-B See Section AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized 3 Jan 21, 1927 Removal of shoal between entrance channel to Buffalo River and H.Doc. 481, 68th Cong., 2nd sess. Erie Basin to 21 feet. Jul 3, 1930 Deepening areas H, I, and K in outer harbor 21 feet. Aug 30, 1935" Extension of south entrance and south breakwaters, deepening outer harbor to present project dimensions, and removal of shoals on approach to south entrance. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 71st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 46, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. Aug 30, 1935 Maintenance of channels in Buffalo River and Buffalo ship canal Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 54, Mar 2, 1945" to 21 feet in cooperation with city of Buffalo. 74th Cong., 1st sess. Deepening North and Buffalo River entrance channels, and deepening and maintaining Buffalo River and Buffalo ship canal Jul 14, 1960 to present project dimensions. Deepening approach to south entrance channels, and deepen to 30 feet in outer area and 29 feet in inner area of Oct 23, 1962 southerly part of outer harbor. Deepening portion of outer harbor to 27 feet over a width of 500 feet for 2,500 feet northward from 28-foot project area, widening within 1,700 feet to limits within 150 feet of breakwater axis and 75 feet from harbor line and continuing within these limits for 7,000 feet. Elimination of 25-foot wide strip between presently authorized and proposed easterly dredging limits. Elimination of easterly 50-foot wide undredged strip in existing 23-foot depth project area, extending northerly from 27-foot depth to Buffalo River entrance channel. Previously authorized but uncompleted portions of work authorized by 1935 act, combined within this act as a single improvement. Jul 14, 1960 As amended Removal of abandoned abutments of South Michigan bridge. 4 BUFFALO HARBOR, NY ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING Nov. 28, 1990 The Secretary may remove, as part of operation and maintenance of a navigation project, contaminated sediments outside the boundaries of and adjacent to the navigation channel. The Secretary may remove contaminated sediments from the waters of the United States, in general, for the purpose of environmental enhancement and water quality improvement if such removal is requested by a non-Federal sponsor and the sponsor agrees to pay 50% of the cost of the removal. Oct. 12, 1996 Amended P.L. 101-640 to include Buffalo Harbor, NY as priority work. 5 Aug 13, 1968 CATTARAUGUS HARBOR, NY (See Section 4 of Text). Construction of arrowhead breakwaters at mouth of Creek entrance channel 200 feet wide at lakeward end, 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep from that depth in lake to point 1,575 feet upstream; channel 100 feet wide, 6 feet deep an additional 3,425 feet upstream; and recreational fishing facilities at mouth. H. Doc. 352, 78th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 151, 86" Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 451, 87' Cong., 2nd sess. Sec. 107, PL 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Dec 15, 1980. P.L. 101-640 P.L. 104-303 H. Doc. 97, 90"h Cong., 1"' sess. 20-24 Documents BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 20-B See Section AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized CLEVELAND HARBOR, OH Mar 3, 1875 West breakwater. Aug 5, 1886 Part of east breakwater.9 Aug 11, 1888 Extension of east breakwater. Jun 3, 1896 Reconstruction of piers.' Mar 3, 1899 Dredging channel between piers and outer harbor to depth of 19 feet; dredging to depth of 23 feet in any portion of harbor is discretion of Secretary of War. Jun 13, 1902 Arrowhead breakwater and extension of east breakwater. Annual Report, 1876, p.558. H. Ex. Doc. 116, 48th Cong., 2nd sess, and Annual Report, 1886, p. 1865.H. Ex. Doc. 189, 50th Cong., 2nd sess., and Annual Report, 1888, p. 2005. H. Doc. 326, 54th Cong., Ist sess., and Annual Report, 1896, p. 2949. H. Doc. 156, 55th Cong., 2nd sess., and Annual Report, 1899, pp. 3075 and 3078. H. Doc 118, 56th Cong, 2nd sess. 20-25 Documents REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY98 TABLE 20-B See Section AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Mar 2, 1907 Removal of deflecting arm of old east breakwater and closure of Jun 25, 1910 gap between old and new east breakwaters. Jul 27, 1916 Pierhead at easterly end of east breakwater. Aug 8, 1917 Maintenance and improvement of channels in Cuyahoga and Old Aug 29, 1937 Rivers to a depth of 21 feet to a point 2,000 feet upstream from Clark Ave. viaduct and 18-foot turning basin. Aug 30, 193512 Deepening outer harbor and channel between piers to present project dimensions, construction of 400-foot spur breakwater at gap in shore arm of west breakwater, removal of easterly 150 feet of west breakwater, elimination from project of a 298-foot southerly extension on west pier, and abandonment of inner 932 feet of shore arm of west breakwater. Aug 30, 1935" Maintenance dredging in Cuyahoga and Old Rivers for 1 year as an emergency measure. Mar 2, 194514 Maintenance of extension of Cuyahoga River channel. Extension, maintenance, and improvement to a depth of 21 feet of Cuyahoga River channel to present project limit.'5 ' Jul 24, 1946 Improvement of Cuyahoga and Old Rivers to a depth of 23 feet and replacement or pier construction of 7 railroad bridges.2 Jul 3, 1958 Deepening channel 25 feet through east basin of outer harbor; replacement of Erie-Lackawanna Railroad bridge over Cuyahoga River at mile 4.1 and widening of channel at that point, with elimination of reconstruction of east pier of bridge as previously authorized; and replacement of Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Bridge over Old River near its mouth and Willow Avenue Highway Bridge about 800 feet above mouth and widening channel at four locations along lower, 2,000 feet of river.3 Jul 14, 1960 Depth of 29 feet in lake approach to main entrance; 28 feet in entrance channel to lakeward ends of piers at mouth of Cuyahoga River; 27 feet in river to a point just above its junction with Old River, and in Old River to upstream limit of present 23-foot project; 28 feet in west basin within existing project limits as modified to eliminate a triangular area at west end and to extend limits to a line parallel to and 75 feet from harbor line; and 28 feet in westerly 800 feet of east basin.24 Oct 23, 1962 An area in east basin 27 feet deep extending 3,800 feet easterly of 28-foot area with project limits 380 feet from east breakwater and on landward side generally by a line 75 feet lakeward of and parallel to harbor line. A dock channel to Nicholson Cleveland Terminal Co. pier, at easterly end of east basin, from 25-foot contour to a limit 75 feet north of pierhead line, 400 feet wide at shoreward end and flared toward the lake. Jul 14, 1960 as amended Deepening upper end of Old River channel from 21 to 27 feet. No printed report. H. Doc 891, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 707, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 84, 74th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 477, 72nd Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 39, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 95, 79th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 629, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 107, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 152, 86th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 527, 87th Cong., 2nd sess.4 Sec. 107, PL 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Dec 6, 1966. 20-26 Documents BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 20-B See Section AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized 6 Oct 22, 1976 Preparation of Phase I design memorandum for improvements consisting of removal of portions of entrance breakwater; construction of breakwater; construction of breakwater extension of east entrance; deepening approach and entrance channels; construction of diked disposal area; and installation of recreational fishing facilities on west breakwater. Aug 15, 1985 Deepening and widening east entrance and approach channels, deepening the east basin channel and disposing of dredge material in an existing disposal site, as described in the Report to the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors Jan 22, 1985, including bulkheading and other necessary repairs at Pier 34 and approach channels and necessary protective structures for mooring basins for transient vessels in the area south of Pier 34 and including such modifications as may be recommended by the Chief of Engineers at a cost not to exceed $36,000,000. Nov 17, 1986 Bulkheading and other necessary repairs at Pier 34 and approach channels and necessary protective structures for mooring basins for transient wells in the area south of Pier 34. Dec 21, 1987 Appropriates and directs the Secretary of the Army to use the sum of $11,000,000 which is to remain available until expended to carry out the provisions for the harbor modifications contained in PL 99- 662. CONNEAUT HARBOR, OH Jun 25, 1910 Extension of east breakwater, construction of new west breakwater, removal of portion of old west breakwater, and dredging of outer harbor to 19 feet. Aug 8, 1917'~ Realignment of west breakwater, removal of remainder of old west breakwater, and deepening outer harbor to 20 feet. Removal of Bessemer & Lake Erie R.R. Co. of inner 635 feet of west pier." Aug 30, 1935" Removal of portion of west breakwater, extension of breakwaters to present project dimensions, construction of pierheads on outer ends of breakwaters, deepening outer harbor to present project dimensions; removal of portions of river pier, and elimination from project of a 255-foot shoreward extension of west breakwater. Oct 23, 1962 Deepening easterly part of outer harbor to 28 feet in soft material and 29 feet in hard material; deepening remaining triangular area of outer harbor to 22 feet in soft material and 23 feet in hard material; deepening inner harbor for 2,450 feet upstream of outer end of west pier to 27 feet in soft material and 28 feet in hard material; removal of east pier, extension of east breakwater to shore; and an access channel 8 feet deep in outer harbor to city dock. Previously authorized, but uncompleted portion of work authorized by 1917 and 1935 acts combined with this act for accomplishment as a single improvement. Oct 12, 1996 Deauthorized the most southerly 300 feet of the 1,670 foot long shore arm, authorized by the R&H Act of 1910. Sec. 175, PL 94-587 PL 99-88 Sec. 202, PL 99-662. PL 100-202. Doc. 653, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 983, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 48, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 415, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. P.L. 104-303 20-27 Documents REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY98 TABLE 20-B See Section AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized DUNKIRK HARBOR, NY Mar 2, 1827 Construction of west pier.9" Mar 2, 1867 Breakwater and evacuation of entrance channel to 13 feet.9 Jun 3, 1896 Deepening of entrance channel and harbor basin to a depth of suitable for vessels of 16-foot draft. Jun 25, 1910 Removal of rock reef bordering the inner entrance channel. Jun 30, 1948 Deepening outer entrance channel to present project depths; removal of rock shoal on the west side of the entrance channel to a depth of 17 feet, and changed limits of the inner entrance channel and basin to present project dimensions. Dec 15, 1970 (House Public Works Committee) Jun 22, 1971 (Senate Public Works Committee) Sec. 201 of F.C. Act of 1965 Construction of small-boat harbor. ERIE HARBOR, PA May 26, 1824 Breakwaters and piers; dredging entrance channel; and brushwood protection of beach of Presque Isle peninsula.' Mar 3, 1899 Deepening channel and harbor basin too 18 feet; repair and extension of piers; and plant growth and emergency protection of work on peninsula. Jun 15, 1910 Nov 28, 192020 Deepening channel and part of harbor to 20 feet. S. Ex. Doc.42, 35th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report 1866 pt. IV, p.155 Annual Report, 1871, p. 214 H. Doc. 63, 54th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 720, 61st Cong. 2nd sess. 4 H. Doc. 632, 80th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 91-423, 91st Cong., 2nd sess. Annual Report, 1915, p. 1965. H.Doc.70, 55th Cong.,lst sess. And Annual Report, 1896, p.3237.19 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. Reconveyed Presque Isle Peninsula to the State of Pennsylvania for park purposes. Aug 30, 1935 Deepening, widening, and straightening entrance channel, dredging channel at easterly end of harbor basin, all to present project dimensions; elimination of north breakwater from project; and limitation of south breakwater to a length of 1,200 feet. Mar 2, 1945 Protection of the peninsula south of the waterworks settling basin. Sep 3, 1954 Widen 25-foot deep approach channel to ore dock. H. Doc. 52, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 345, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. 20-28 Documents BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 20-B See Section AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized 9 Jul 14, 1960 Depth of 29 feet in the entrance channel to a point opposite the inner end of the north pier, thence 28 feet in soft material and 29 feet in hard material in the remainder of the entrance channel, within the general limits of the 25-foot basin and inner channel opposite the ore dock except as modified to eliminate from the project a triangular area along the easterly side; and a depth of 28 feet over 300-foot westward extension of the 25-foot basin.26 Depth of 27 feet in soft material and 28 feet in hard material in Oct 23, 1962 approach area to Duquesne Marine Terminal. Previously authorized but uncompleted portion of work authorized by 1935 act is combined with this act as a single improvement. 10 FAIRPORT HARBOR, OH Mar 3, 182521 Construction of piers. Jun 3, 1896 Mar 3, 1905 Breakwaters and dredging outer harbor to a depth of 18 feet. Mar 2, 1919 1,400-foot extension of east breakwater, present project dimension of east pier, and deepening of to 19 feet. Jan 21, 1927 4,000-foot extension of east breakwater at limit of cost to the Jul 3, 1930 United States of $715,000. Aug 30, 193522 Deepening of outer harbor and entrance channel to present dimensions; extending the west breakwater to present project dimensions with pierhead at its outer end; removal of west pier, and construction of bulkhead on west side of river channel. Aug 26, 1937 Dredging of 21- and 24-foot river channels and turning basin in Grand River to present project dimensions. Jul 24, 1946 Dredging of 8-foot river channel. GREAT SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY Mar 2, 1829 Construction of piers and breakwater.9 Aug 2, 1882 Extension of piers to 15-foot contour in the lake. Mar 3, 1925 Deepening and widening of channel to 18-foot depth and 150- foot width. Jul 3, 1930 Widening channel lakeward of piers to 250 feet. Aug 30, 1935 Dredging channel to present project dimensions. H. Doc. 199, 86th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 340, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. 4 Annual Report, 1889, pp. 2147-2153. H .Doc. 347, 54th Cong.,lst sess. And Annual Reports, 1896, p.2956; 1903, p. 2084; 1905, p. 2349. H. Doc. 206, 63rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 592, 69th Cong., 2nd sess., Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 472, 72nd Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 79, 74th Cong., 2nd sess.4 H. Doc. 706, 79th Cong., 2nd sess.4 Annual Report, 1876 pt. II p. 589. Annual Report, 1881, p. 2442. H. Doc. 192, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 17, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 23, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. 20-29 Documents 11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY98 TABLE 20-B See Section AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized HURON HARBOR, OH Mar 2, 1905 Extension of west pier, construction of east breakwater, removal of part of old east pier; deepening of channel to 19 feet; and dredging of sheltered area. Mar 2, 1919 Widening river to 200 feet; removal of remainder of old east pier, construction of new spur pier, enlargement of sheltered area; and closure of beach at shore end of west pier. Aug 30, 193522 Extension of west pierhead at its outer end; removal of outer end of east breakwater and construction pierhead on new outer end; widening and deepening channel to present project dimensions; enlargement of turning basin at head of channel; shore protection west of west pier, and elimination from project construction of spur pier and dredging sheltered area outside channel limits. Depths of 29 feet in approach channel, 28 feet in entrance Oct 23, 1962 channel, 27 feet in river channel, 21 feet in turning basin and abandonment of lakeward end of existing approach channel. Jul 3, 1958 IRONDEQUOIT BAY, NY Construction entrance channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide, extending from 9-foot depth in Lake Ontario to junction with inner bay channels, a distance of about 1,300 feet; inner channel, 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, from entrance channel to deep water in bay, a distance of about 3,035 feet, access channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 500 feet in length from the inner bay channel to the west; two stone rubblemound structures 1,350 feet and 750 in length at the natural entrance; and recreational facilities. LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY Aug 30, 1852 West entrance pier.' Jun 23, 1866 Extension of west pier and construction of west breakwater, and dredging channel to 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide. 9 Mar 3, 1871 Mar 3, 1881 East pier and east breakwater.9 Extension of piers lakeward to 15.5-foot contour, and dredging channel to 15.5 feet. Jun 13, 1902 Extension of east pier 300 feet lakeward. LORAIN HARBOR, OH Mar 3, 1899 Breakwaters and extension of piers to present dimensions. Mar 2, 1907 Extend 18-foot channel from inner end of piers to Erie Avenue Bridge. Jun 25, 1910 Extend breakwaters and dredge to depth of 19 feet in outer harbor. H. Doc. 122, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 5, 63rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 478, 72nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 165, 87th Cong., 1st sess. 4 H. Doc. 332, 84th Cong., 2nd sess Annual Report, 1874, p.256 Annual Report, 1874, p.2 5 6 Annual Report, 1871, p.2 3 4 Annual Report, 1881, pp. 2444 and 2446. Annual Report, 1901, p. 3364. H. Doc. 131, 55th Cong., 2nd sess., and Annual Report 1898, p. 2718. H. Doc. 560, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 644, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. 20-30 Documents 12 13 14 15 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 20-B See Section AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized 15 Aug 8, 1917 Extend breakwaters to present dimensions. Aug 8, 1917 Deepen outer harbor and river channel of Erie Avenue Bridge to 20 feet. Jul 3, 1930 H. Doc. 980, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 985, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Extend 20-foot channel to American Shipbuilding Co. drydock. H. Doc. 587, 69th Cong., 2nd sess. Aug 30, 1935 Widen 2 bends in river and enlarge turning basin opposite National Tube Co. dock."2 Aug 30, 1935 Approach channel to municipal pier. Aug 30, 1935 Deepen outer harbor and river channel to American Shipbuilding Co. drydock 2 present project dimensions and extension of river channel to upper end of National Tube Co. dock with turning basin opposite that dock. Maintenance dredging in Black River from American Shipbuilding Co. Drydock 2. Upper end of National Tube Co. dock was authorized Apr 7, 1934, by Public Works Administration. Enlarging turning basin opposite National Tube Co. dock to present project dimensions. Mar 2, 1945 Turning basin in bend of Black River immediately upstream from Baltimore & Ohio RR coal dock. Jul 14, 1960 Replace Norfolk and Western Railway swing bridge with a vertical lift bridge; construct two detached arrowhead breakwaters lakeward of existing breakwaters; construct extension of east breakwater, to shore; remove 300 feet of lakeward end of west breakwater; remove outer 1,100 feet east pier; deepen lake approach to 29 feet, 800-foot wide outer harbor channel to 27 feet; widen river channel at bends; and construct a new turning basin 21 feet deep near upstream limit of existing project. 27 Jul 14, 1960 as Construction of a 225 foot detached rubble mound breakwater amended and an 800 foot long rubble mound breakwater attached to the east breakwater shore arm in the east basin of the outer harbor. Nov 17, 1986 Two bed cuts on Black River between the Norfolk and Western Railroad Bridge and 21st Street Bridge, excavated to existing channel depth of 27 feet. Widening Upper Turning Basin at existing authorized depth of 21 feet. 8 NEW YORK STATE BARGE CANAL Nov 17, 1986 Authorizes the Secretary to reimburse the State of New York for 50% of the cost of operating, maintaining and rehabilitating the New York State Barge Canal. The Federal contribution shall be limited in any fiscal year to $5,000,000, or 50% of the expenditures in that fiscal year, whichever is the lesser. Oct 12, 1996 The Secretary may make capital improvements to the New York State Canal System for the purposes of rehabilitation, renovation, preservation, and maintenance of the New York State Canal System and its related facilities. The Federal share of the cost of capital improvements shall be 50%, up to a limit of $8,000,000. 20-31 H. Doc. 469, 72nd Cong., 2nd sess. Senate Committee print, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 51, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 161, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 166, 86th Cong., 1st. sess. Sec. 107, PL 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Mar 12, 1986 H. Doc. 124, 99th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 99-662 P.L. 104-303 Documents 16 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY98 TABLE 20-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Acts Work Authorized Documents OAK ORCHARD, NY Harbor of refuge. Deauthorized a part of the Section 107 Small Boat Basin authorized by R&H Act of 1960, as amended. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2nd sess. P.L 104-303 20-32 17 Mar 2, 1945 Oct 12, 1996 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Mar 2, 1867 Mar 4, 1913 Work Authorized OLCOTT HARBOR, NY Dredging a channel 11 feet deep between parallel piers.' Deepening channel to 12 feet and maintenance of west pier. Nov 17, 1986 Construct the project for Navigation, Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Jun 11, 1980. OSWEGO HARBOR, NY Jul 11, 1870 Construction of outer west breakwater.9 Mar 2, 1907 Jul 3, 1930 20 Repair of outer west breakwater under Plan (A).' Construction of arrowhead breakwaters; deepening outer harbor between arrowhead breakwaters; west outer harbor east of Erie- Lackawanna coal dock, and Oswego River north of Seneca St., to 21 feet; and deepening west outer harbor, west of Erie- Lackawanna coal dock, to 16 feet. 29 Aug 30, 1935 Widening channel to harbor line in Oswego River north of Seneca Street. Oct 17, 1940 Closing gap in west breakwater; deepening west outer harbor, west of east line of Erie-Lackawanna coal dock, to project depth.3" Jun 30, 1948 Construction of east outer breakwater; removal of the inner end of east arrowhead breakwater; and dredging channel and basin in east outer harbor." Sep 3, 1954 Construction of detached breakwater at harbor entrance and removal of shoals in approach to harbor entrance to 25 feet deep. Depth of 27 feet in lake approach channel; 25 feet deep in outer Oct 23, 1962 harbor channel 800 feet wide from entrance gap to a turning basin 25 feet deep about 750 by 1,100 feet, at mouth of Oswego River; depth of 24 feet in earth and 25 feet in hard material in river channel from turning basin to upstream end of Port of Oswego Authority's east side terminal, a distance of about 1,600 feet; relocation of Federal project limits in Oswego River upstream of 24-foot channel to Federal project limit at north line of West Seneca St., on lines parallel to 50 feet channel ward of established harbor lines; elimination of maintenance of inner west breakwater and elimination of modification authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1948. Oct 12, 1996 Deauthorized the portion of the Federal Channel authorized by the R&H Act of 1910 as amended by the R&H Act of 1935, from the southernmost alignment of the Route 68 Bridge upstream to the northernmost alignment of the Lake St. Bridge. PORT CLINTON HARBOR, OH Jun 10, 1872 Parallel stone and pile jetties at mouth of river, east jetty 2,200 feet long and west jetty 1,980 feet long extending to 10-foot contour in lake channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide for outer 4,200 foot length and 200 feet wide for inner 800 foot length to Highway Bridge. TABLE 20-B See Section 18 P.L. 104-303 Annual Report, 1875, p. 295 20-33 Documents Annual Report, 1866, pt. 1I, p. 15 pt. IV, p. 158. H. Doc. 780, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess.4 Sec. 601, PL 99-662 Annual Report, 1870, pp. 54, 220 and 221. H. Doc. 55, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 24, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 7, 74* Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 96, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 722, 80th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 487, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 471, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. 19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY98 TABLE 20-B See Section AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized ROCHESTER, HARBOR, NY Mar 2, 1829 Construction of piers.' Aug 2, 1882 Extension of piers to 15 foot contour in the lake. Concrete superstructure on piers.' Jun 25, 1910 Deepening channel to 20 feet. Aug 30, 19356 Dredging of the entrance channel and turning basin, and the elimination of the inner ends of the east and west piers, all to present project dimensions. Mar 2, 1945 Maintenance of existing channel upstream of the Penn Central Co. Bridge. Jul 14, 1960 Depth of 24 feet in the channel from the lake to the west Pier, a depth of 23 feet between the piers and in the lower river to the Penn Central Co. Bridge, including the existiig turning basin; a depth of 21 feet from the bridge to the upstream project limit, with suitable widening at the bends; and, stream turning basin 21 feet deep and 650 feed wide adjacent to the improved channel, with two mooring dolphins. Nov 28, 1990 A navigation project for the mouth of the Genesee River in Rochester, New York, by development and implementation of wave surge control measures. Project to be carried out under Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577). ROCKY RIVER HARBOR, OH Jun 10, 1872 East pier and dredging of channel. Aug 26, 1937 Extension of east pier and deepening channel to present project dimensions. Oct 27, 1965 Realign and extend channel and construct an anchorage basin. SANDUSKY HARBOR, OH Mar 3, 1899 Construction of channel protection works. Jun 13, 1902 Widening of Straight and Dock channels and deepening to 19 feet. Mar 2, 1919 Extension of east jetty to total length of 6,000 feet, with pierhead on outer end; deepening of the outer, straight, and easterly portion of Dock channel to 20 feet. Jan 21, 1927 Deepening of Dock Channel to 22 feet Aug 30, 1935 Enlargement of turning basin and construction rock dike. Oct 2, 1945 Maintenance of Bay Channel to 22 feet; and elimination from project of portion of turning basin and rock dike. Annual Report, 1874, p. 247 Annual Report, 1881, p. 2437; Annual Report, 1905, p. 2383. H. Doc. 342, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H.Doc. 484, 72nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 139, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 409, 86th Cong., 2nd sess.4 P.L. 101-640 Annual Report 1871, p. 211 H. Doc. 70, 75h Cong., 1" sess. H. Doc. 352, 88" Cong., 2" sess.' H. Doc. 362, 55th Cong., 2nd sess. and Annual Report 1898, p. 2708. H. Doc. 120, 56th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 982, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 584, 69th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 328, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 20-34 21 &29 Documents 22 23 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 20-B See Section AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized 23 Jul 14, 1960 Extending Moseley Channel and deepening that channel and the outer end of Straight channel to 26 feet, from deep water in the lake to the vicinity of Cedar Point dock; widening the bend at the junction of the Moseley and Straight channels to 25 feet from the vicinity of Cedar Point dock to Junction Bay channel; deepening the Bay channel from the junction with the Straight channel to the outer end of the Pennsylvania Coal dock no. 3 to 24 feet, thence from outer end of the coal dock to the turning basin to 24 feet in soft material and 25 in hard, with no Federal dredging within 50 feet of the dock; and enlarging the turning basin, including removal of approximately 300 feet of the rock dike, and deepening to 24 feet in soft material and 25 feet in hard. TOLEDO HARBOR, OH Mar 3, 1899 A channel 400 feet wide and 21 feet deep from 25-foot contour in Maumee Bay to fassett Street Bridge, 200 feet wide and 19 feet deep above that point and a 500-foot turning basin at Upper End. A stone revetted earth dike in Maumee Bay Channel. Act 1899 modified to insure a navigable channel to 21 feet from Jun 25, 1910 fassett Street Bridge to Lake. Channel 25 feet deep and 500 feet wide from 25-foot contour to Aug 30, 1935 mouth of Maumee River (300 feet wide onneach side of center dike in Bay Channel), thence 400 feet wide to fassett Street Bridge, 200 feet wide above that point and a turning basin at Upper end 18 feet deep. May 17, 1950 Widening at bend of mouth of River opposite Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Dock. Sept 3, 1954 Removal of center dike in Maumee Bay Channel. Jul 3, 1958 Jul 14, 1960 Jul 4, 1836 Enlarge widening at bend opposite Chesapeake and Ohio dock and turning basin opposite American Shipbuilding Co. dock. Deepening Bay Channel including widening to 28 feet, deepen River channels to NY Central Railroad Bridge to 27 feet and construct new turning basin below Anthony Wayne Bridge.28 VERMILION HARBOR, OH Parallel piers and dredging channel to 8 feet deep. Mar 3, 1875 Deepening of channel to 12 feet. Mar 3, 1905 Jul 3, 1958 Reconstruction of piers. New entrance formed by two overlapping arrowhead breakwaters and extension of existing river channel upstream to Liberty St. Bridge. WEST HARBOR, OH Oct 27, 1965 Construction of arrowhead breakwaters, entrance channel and access channel. H. Doc. 198, 55th Cong., 2nd sess. & Annual Report 1898, p. 2693. H. Doc. 865, 60th Cong., Ist sess. River and Harbors Committee Doc 21, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 189, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 620, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 436, 84th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 153, 86th Cong., 1st sess.4 Annual Report, 1880. Annual Report, 1874, p.2 1 9 H. Doc. 252, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 231, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 245, 88th Cong., 2nd sess. 20-35 Documents 24 25 26 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY98 TABLE 20-B See Section AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Mar 2, 1945 WILSON HARBOR, NY Entrance channel 80 feet wide and 8 feet deep; and restore east and west piers. Aug 3, 1968 Extend existing channel 300 feet; and construct new channel 3,800 feet long through Tuscarora Bay. STURGEON POINT, EVANS, NY Jul 14, 1960 Rehabilitate existing breakwater, construct rubble mound west breakwater extension, construct rubble mound east breakwater, a shore revetment and dredging. Sep 3, 1954 PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA, ERIE, PA Construction of groin system, seawall, bulkhead, placement of beach material at waterworks reservation and along remainder of peninsula; removal of portions of existing structures. Jul 14, 1960 Periodic nourishment of shores for a 10-year period. Mar 7, 1974 Periodic nourishment of shore for a 5-year period. Oct 22, 1976 Preparation of Phase I design memorandum for improvements consisting of construction of five sections of spaced offshore breakwaters and replenishment of beach area with sand fill. Nov 17, 1986 Construct offshore breakwaters and restore beaches. MT. MORRIS LAKE, GENESEE RIVER, NY Dec 22, 1944 Construction of a concrete gravity dam and reservoir. Construct a visitor center at Mt. Morris Dam to be known as the "William B. Hoyt II Visitor Center". SWAN CREEK, TOLEDO, OH Jun 30, 1948 Construction of levee and flood wall system. Relocate 540 foot section of creek. ONONDAGA LAKE, NY Nov 16, 1990 The Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Governor of the State of New York, acting jointly, shall convene a management conference for the restoration and management of Onondaga Lake. The purpose of the conference shall include the development, in the 2-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this fact, for a comprehensive restoration, conservation, and management plan for Onondaga Lake that recommends priority corrective actions and compliance scheduled for the cleanup of the Lake and the coordination of the implementation of the plan by the State of New York, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the H. Doc. 679, 76th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 112, 90th Cong., 1st sess. Sec.107, PL86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Oct 21, 1987 H. Doc. 231, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 397, 86th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 796, 93rd Cong., 2nd sess. Sec. 101, PL 94-587 Sec. 501, PL 99-662. H. Doc 615, 78th Cong., 2nd sess. Sec. 103, PL 102-580 Sec 205, PL 80-858 Authorized by Chief of Engineers May 15, 1991 PL 101-596 20-36 Documents 27 28 30 31 32 33 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 20-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Acts Work Authorized Documents 33 Environmental Protection Agency and all local agencies, governments and other groups participating in the management conference. Not later than 120 days after the completion of the plan, and after providing for public review and comment, the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works and the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall approve the plan if it meets the requirements of this section and if the Governor of the State of New York concurs in such approval. Upon approval of the plan, the plan shall be implemented. The Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works and the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency are authorized to make grants to the State of New York to perform activities authorized under this section or to contract for such performance, provided that such grants shall not exceed 70% of the costs of such activities and that the non-Federal share of such costs are provided from non-Federal sources. The Governor of the State of New York may, using funds provided above, make grants for research, surveys, administrative services and studies approved by the management conference, and gathering data and retaining expert consultants in support of litigation undertaken by the State of New York to compel cleanup or obtain cleanup and damage costs from parties responsible for the pollution of Onondaga Lake, including adminstrative services. Nov 28, 1990 Reaffirmation of PL 101-596. PL 101-640 Oct 31, 1992 The Secretary is authorized to design and construct projects to PL102-580 address water quality problems associated with storm water discharges from large storm events for... the watershed areas of Onondaga County and Syracuse, New York, from which waters discharge into Onondaga Lake, New York. The design of Projects shall ensure the deelopment of effective Federal and non-Federal actions which will contribute toward compliance with the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. Total project cost shall be shared at 75% Federal and 25% non-Federal. Operation and maintenance cost shall be 100% non-Federal. 1. Authorized by Public Works Administration, Sep 6, 1933. 2. Widening Cuyahoga River downstream at end of Cut 4 classified inactive. 3. Replacement of bridges 19 and 32, widening Cuyahoga and Old River Channels, classified deferred. 4. Contains latest published map. 5. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 6. Authorized May 28, 1935 by Emergency Relief Administration Act of 1935. 7. Improvement of guide pier at Black Rock Lock was deauthorized by Congress in Aug 1977. 8. Classified deferred. 9. Completed under previous projects. 10. Also Sundry Civil Act of Mar 3, 1905. I I. Authorized in part by Public Works Administration, Sep 6, 1933. 12. Authorized by Public Works Administration, Sep 6, 1933. 13. Previously authorized by Public Works Administration. 14. First Deficiency Appropriations Act approved Apr 1, 1944. 20-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY98 TABLE 20-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Acts Work Authorized Documents 15. Authorized by Defense Plant Corp., May 19, 1942. 16. Deepening left half of channel extension was eliminated from project by 1962 R&H Act. 17. Permit of Secretary of War, Aug 5, 1927. 18. Modified 1828 and 1852. 19. Extension of north pier portion of this modification was deauthorized Nov 1981. 20. Public Law 366. 21. Modified 1830, 1881, and 1890. New work completed under previous projects. 22. Partly included in Public Works Administration program, Nov 15, 1933. 23. First Supplemental National Defense Appropriation Act, 1944 approved Dec 23, 1943. 24. Deepening remainder of Cuyahoga River from bridge I to and including Old River, classified deferred. 25. Included in Public Works Administration program, Nov 15, 1933. 26. Deepening strips adjacent to north and south piers was deauthorized Aug 1982. 27. Deepening and widening remainder of Black River channel at Cut I has been deauthorized. 28. The 27-foot project extended 2,800 feet an turning basin relocated under authority of Chief of Engineers. 29. Deepening a 200-foot strip along harbor line east of mouth of Oswego River is deauthorized. 30. Deepening to 22 feet a 150-foot wide strip in west outer harbor deauthorized in May 1981. 31. Modification eliminated by River and Harbor Act of Oct 26, 1962. 32. Modification classified inactive. 20-38 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 20-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to Sep 30, 1998 See Section of See Annual Operations & Text Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance 29 Barcelona Harbor, NY Completed 1989 $1,185,85316 $1,958,238 Big (Cunningham) Creek, OH Completed - 19,7633 Black River Harbor, NY - -2 42,401 Buffalo Small Boat Harbor, NY Completed 1994 602,01618 Cape Vincent Harbor, NY Completed 1962 275,082 1,769,056 Cattaraugus Creek, NY - 2 57,410 Cattaraugus Harbor, NY Completed 1996 4,804,06019 345,623 Geneva-on-the-Lake, OH Completed 1990 3,145,176" 9,627 Grasse River (Massena),NY - 1891 9,0003 Kelleys Island, OH Active 197412 129,874 Little River at Cayuga Island, NY Completed 1969 46,804' 6,580 Morristown Harbor, NY Completed 1949 6,221 13,218 Niagara Remedial Works, NY' Completed 1966 6,069,395 510,819 Niagara River, NY'3 Completed 1964 559,4579 290,845 Ogdensburg Harbor, NY Completed 1987 1,720,466s4 1,423,038"5 Port Clinton Harbor, NY Completed 1997 71,950 1,067,211 Port Ontario Harbor, NY Completed 1995 2,369,62120 40,961 Pultneyville Harbor, NY" - 1934 68,219 20,087 Put in Bay, OH Completed 195112 51,609 14,357 Rocky River, OH Completed 1997 343,494 3,111,614 Sackets Harbor, OH Completed 1982 25,010 28,617 Sandusky River, OH4 - 1894 58,0003 557 1. No commerce reported. 2. Only information available is in index to reports of Chief of Engineers. 3. Amount includes maintenance; not separable. 4. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., Ist sess. 5. Abandonment recommended in Ex. Doc. 16, 35th Cong., I1sste ss. 6. Channel improved by local interests. 7. Includes local interests contribution of $25,742. 8. Costs of operation and maintenance of this project will be settled directly by concerned power agencies. No further appropriations will be made to this project. 9. Includes local interest contribution of $27,563. 10. Includes local interests contribution of $5,000. 11. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 375, 64th Cong., I1st sess. 12. Annual Report for Detroit District. 13. Construction of compensating works as authorized by 1930 R&H Act was authorized by Congress in Aug 1977. 14. Includes $271,380 for previous projects. Excludes $57,000 contributed funds. 15. Includes $130,512 for previous projects. 16. Includes $56,616 for previous projects. Excludes $181,500 contributed funds. 17. Excludes $3,261,375 contributed funds. 18. Excludes $593,216 contributed funds. 19. Excluded $2,566,529 contributed funds. 20. Includes $50,000 for previous projects. Excludes $1,299,008 contributed funds. 20-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY98 TABLE 20-D OTHER AUTHORIZED SHORE PROTECTION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to Sep 30, 1998 See Section of See Annual Operations & Text Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance 29 Hamlin Beach State Park, NY Completed 1976 $1,769,600 Lakeview Park, Lorain, OH Completed 1987 1,741,1252 Maumee Bay State Park, OH Completed 1995 2,780,9753 Selkirk Shore State Park, Lake Completed 1963 58,978 $307 Ontario, NY' 1. Federal participation was limited to one-third of first cost when project was authorized by 1954 River and harbor Act. Federal participation was changed from one-third to 70 percent of remaining work under Public Law 87-874. 2. Does not include $739,700 contributed funds. 3. Does not include $199,845 contributed funds. 20-40 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 20-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Cost to Sep 30, 1998 See Section Annual Operations & of Text Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance 37 Auburn, NY, Owasco Outlet Completed 1962 $371,9853 - Batavia and vicinity, Tonawanda Completed 1957 335,385 - Creek, NY Camp Perry, OH Completed 1967' 275,000 - Cayuga Creek, Cheektowaga, NY2 Completed 1984 1,404,500 - Cuyahoga River Basin, OH Active 1985 1, l 17,000 - Dansville and vicinity, Canaseraga Active 1985 490,300 - Creek, NY Fremont, OH, Sandusky River Completed 1976 8,589,8246 - Ithaca, Cayuga Inlet, NY Completed 1978 3,929,3009 - Lackawanna, NY, Smokes Creek Completed 1971 3,542,0684 - Lancaster, Cayuga Creek, NY Completed 1954 797,300 - Marsh Creek, Geneva, NY Completed - 226,429 - Montour Falls, Oswego River Completed 1954 1,681,785 - Basin, NY Onondaga Creek, Nedrow, NY 2 Completed 1964 330,231 Ottawa, OH Deferred 1989 374,000 - Owasco Inlet and Outlet, Montville Inactive and Dry Creek, State Ditch and Deferred 1950 281,559 Crane Brook, NY' Point Place, Toledo, OH Completed 1990 9,885,733" - Reno Beach-Howard Farms, OH Completed 1997 5,483,1922 - Scajaquada Creek, NY Completed 1985 4,944,852 Syracuse, Oswego River Basin, NY Completed 1954 3,349,248 Warsaw, NY, Oatka Creek2 Completed 1969 558,3175 - Wellsville, NY, Genesee River Completed 1978 3,145,30310 1. In-active portion of work for State Ditch has been done by local interest and work on Crane Brook has been deferred at the request of local interests. 2. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers. 3. Excludes costs of $188,732 under Public Law 88-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, Jun 1972. 4. Includes local interests contribution of $50,000. 5. Excludes costs of $26,807 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, Jun 1972. 6. Includes local interests contribution of $6,944. Excludes cost of $383,786 under Public Law 84-99. Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, for emergency restoration of levees damaged during 1973. 7. Includes local interest contribution of $125,000. 8. Annual Report for Detroit District. 9. Includes local interests contribution of $99,000. Excludes costs of $104,005 under Public Law 84-99. Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, Jun 1972. 10. Includes local interests contribution of $50,000. Excludes costs of $374,042 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storms. 11. Excludes $1,871,631 in contributed funds. 12. Excludes $475,994 in contributed funds. 20-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY98 TABLE 20- DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS G See Section Project of Text 43 Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY 1935 R&H Act' Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY 1954 R&H Act Buffalo Harbor Drift Removal, NY Buffalo Ship Canal, Buffalo, NY Caledonia, Genessee River, NY 1950 FC Act Cape Vincent Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act Chittenango Creek and Tributaries, NY 1944 FC Act Conneaut H r, OH &H Act, 1910 (souther 300 feet of shorearm) Conneaut Harbor, OH 1966 R&H Act, 1990 WRDA Crane Creek State Park, OH 1962 R&1 Act Dunkirk Harbor, NY WRDA 1986 Eastlake, Chagrin River, OH 1965 FC Act Edgewater Park, OH 1954 R&H Act Elk Creek Harbor, PA 1966 R&H Act Erie Harbor, PA 1899 R&H Act Erie Harbor, PA 1945 R&H Act Erie Harbor, PA 1960 R&H Act Fairhaven Beach State Park, NY 1958 R&H Act Fairport Harbor, OH 1960 R&H Act For Last Date De- Full Report Authoriz See Annual ed Report For 1962 Aug 1977 1962 1950 1962 1948 1997 1995 19683 1976 1978 1963 1963 1963 1995 May 1981 Dec 1992 Dec 1992 Jan 1990 Nov 1986 Jan 1990 Oct 1996 Nov 1995 Nov 1979 Dec 1992 Jan 1990 Jan 1990 Dec 1992 Nov 1981 Aug 1977 Aug 1982 Jan 1990 Nov 1995 Federal Funds Expended Contributed Funds Expended $12,464 506,344 101,500 67,000 20-42 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 20- DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS G Project Fairport Harbor, OH 43 Sec. 201 1965 FC Act Fort Niagara State Park, NY Sec. 201 1965 FC Act Grandview Bay Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act Great Sodus Bay Harbor, NY 1941 R&H Act Hamlin Beach Harbor, NY 1968 R&H Act Hammondsport, Oswego River Basin, NY 1941 FC Act Huron Harbor, NY 1962 R&H Act6 Ithaca, NY - Cascadilla Creek 1941 FC Act Ithaca, NY - Fall Creek 1941 FC Act Lorain Harbor, OH - Sec. 107, R&H Act 1960 (Portion of small boat basin) Lorain Harbor, OH 1960 R&H Act, modified by 1965 R&H Act4 Maumee River, above Toledo, OH 1872 Act N isaown H r NY M R&H Act (Potion north of northern boundary of Morris St. Extended. Niagara River, Compensating Works, 1930 R&H Act Ogdensburg Harbor, NY 1935 R&H Act Ogdensburg Harbor, NY R&H Acts 1910, 1935 (Portion from southernmost alignment of Rte 68 Bridge upstream to northern alignment of Lake St. Bridge) Oswego Harbor, NY 1930 R&H Act Oswego Harbor, NY 1940 R&H Act 4 For Last Full Report See Annual Date De- Federal Contributed Report For Authoriz Funds Funds ed Expended Expended 1995 Nov 1995 - - Jan 1990 1948 1963 1973 1951 1963 1950 1950 1998 1966 19713 1949 1964 1986 1987 Aug 1977 Aug 1977 Jan 1990 Nov 1983 Jan 1990 Aug 1977 Aug 1977 Oct 1996 Jan 1990 Nov 1977 Oct 1996 Aug 1977 Nov 1986 Oct 1996 1963 1963 1,524 72,052 29,000 8,159 12,300 12,000 Jan 1990 May 1981 20-43 See Section of Text REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY98 TABLE 20- DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS G See Section of Text For Last Full Report See Annual Project Report For Date De- Authoriz ed Federal Funds Expended Contributed Funds Expended Port Bay, NY 1950 R&H Act Red Creek, NY 1966 FC Act Sackets Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act Selkirk Shores State Park, OHG 1954 R&H Act5 1975 1948 1963 Jan 1990 Nov 1986 May 1981 Jan 1990 361,241 19,010 20-44 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 20- DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS G For Last Full Report See Annual Project Report For 43 Sheffield Lake Community Park, Oh 1962 R&H Act Watkins Glenn, NY 1941 FC Act White City Park, OH 1954 R&H Act 1958 Date De- Authoriz ed Aug 1977 Federal Funds Expended Aug 1977 Jan 1990 Contributed Funds Expended 43,182 1. Extension of guide pier only; other improvements completed. 2. Deepening of west outer harbor, other improvements completed. 3. Annual Report for Detroit District. 4. Uncompleted portion. 5. Breakwater. 20-45 See Section of Text REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY98 TABLE 20-H FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Bank Protection (Sec. 14 of 1986 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) See Section of Text Study Identification FY Cost $ 35 Cayuga Creek, Depew, NY 39,922 Coordination Account Funds 9,789 Lake Ontario, Albion, NY 4,251 Lake Ontario, Sodus Point, Wayne County, NY 12,933 Tonawanda Creek, Niagara Co., NY 20,144 20-46 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT * The District is composed of the upper and lower peninsulas of Michigan and portions of Indiana, Wisconsin and Minnesota, which border the lakes. It includes U.S. waters of Lakes Superior, Michigan, Huron, St. Clair and western Lake Erie. Unless otherwise indicated, all depths stated in this report are referred to low water datum as follows: Lake Superior, 601.1 feet; Lake Michigan-Huron, 577.5 feet; Lake Erie, 569.2 feet; and Lake St. Clair, 572.3 feet. These elevations are in feet above the mean water level at Great Lakes Datum, 1985 (IGLD 1985). The IGLD 1985 is a datum or reference system used to define water levels within the Great Lakes - St. Lawrence River system. This datum was implemented in January 1992, officially replacing IGLD 1955. At the time IGLD 1955 was established, it was recognized that this datum would have to be periodically revised due to isostatic rebound. Isostatic rebound is the gradual rising or bouncing back of the earth's crust from the weight of the glaciers that covered the Great Lakes region during the last ice age. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Alpena Harbor, MI ................... 21-2 2. Arcadia Harbor, MI .................. 21-3 3. Ashland Harbor, WI .................. 21-3 4. AuSable Harbor, MI .................. 21-4 5. Black River Harbor (Port Huron), MI ..... 21-4 6. Black River Harbor (U.P.), MI .......... 21-5 7. Cedar River Harbor, MI ............... 21-5 8. Charlevoix Harbor, MI ................ 21-5 9. Cheboygan Harbor, MI................ 21-6 10. Clinton River, MI .................... 21-7 11. Cornucopia Harbor, WI................ 21-7 12. Detroit River, MI .................... 21-8 13. Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN and WI ..... 21-8 14. FoxRiver, WI ...................... 21-10 15. FrankfortHarbor, MI ................ 21-11 16. Grand Haven Harbor, MI ............. 21-11 17. Grand Marais Harbor, MI ............. 21-13 18. Green Bay Harbor, WI ............... 21-13 19. Greilickville Harbor, MI .............. 21-14 20. Hammond Bay Harbor, MI ............ 21-14 21. Harbor Beach Harbor, MI ............. 21-15 22. Harrisville Harbor, MI ................ 21-15 23. Holland Harbor, MI ................. 21-15 24. InlandRoute, MI ................... 21-16 25. Kenosha Harbor, WI ................. 21-17 26. Kewaunee Harbor, WI................ 21-17 27. Keweenaw Waterway, MI ............. 21-18 28. Knife River Harbor, MN ............. 21-19 29. Lac Labelle Harbor, MI .............. 21-19 30. Lake St. Clair, MI, Channels ........... 21-20 31. Leland Harbor, MI ................. 21-20 32Lexington Harbor, MI................. 21-20 Navigation (Continued) Page 33. Little Lake Harbor, MI ................. 21-21 34. Ludington Harbor, MI .................. 21-21 35. Manistee Harbor, MI ................... 21-22 36. Manistique Harbor, MI................. 21-23 37. Manitowoc Harbor, MI ................. 21-23 38. Marquette Harbor, MI .................. 21-24 39. Menominee Harbor & River, MI & WI .... 21-24 40. Milwaukee Harbor, WI ................. 21-25 41. Monroe Harbor, MI ................... 21-26 42. Muskegon Harbor, MI ................. 21-27 43. New Buffalo Harbor, MI ................ 21-28 44. Oconto Harbor, WI .................... 21-28 45. Ontonagon Harbor, MI ................. 21-28 46. Pentwater Harbor, MI .................. 21-29 47. Petoskey Harbor, MI ................... 21-30 48. Point Lookout Harbor, MI ............... 21-30 49. Port Austin Harbor, MI ................. 21-30 50. Port Sanilac Harbor, MI ............... 21-31 51. Port Washington Harbor, WI ............. 21-31 52. Port Wing Harbor, WI .................. 21-31 53. Portage Lake Harbor, MI .............. 21-32 54. Presque Isle Harbor, MI ................ 21-32 55. RougeRiver, MI ...................... 21-33 56. Saginaw River, MI .................... 21-33 57. St. ClairRiver, MI ..................... 21-34 58. St. Joseph Harbor, MI .................. 21-35 59. Saugatuck Harbor and Kalamazoo River, MI................. 21-36 60. Saxon Harbor, WI ..................... 21-36 61. Sebewaing River, MI .................. 21-37 62. Sheboygan Harbor, WI................. 21-37 63. Silver Bay Harbor, MN................. 21-37 21-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Navigation (Continued) Page 64. South Haven Harbor, MI.............. 21-38 65. Sturgeon Bay and Lake MI Ship Canal, WI ............. 21-38 66. Two Harbors, Harbor, MN ............. 21-39 67. Two Rivers Harbor, WI ............... 21-39 68. White Lake Harbor, MI .............. 21-40 69. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ... 21-40 70. Other Authorized Navigation Projects .... 21-40 71. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ...................... 21-40 Shore Protection 72. Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects 21-41 73. Emergency Shore Protection ........... 21-41 74. Beach Erosion Work Under Special Authorization ..................... 21-42 75. Mitigation of Shore Damage ........... 21-42 76. Project Modification for Improving the Quality of the Environment ............ 21-42 Flood Control 77. Clinton River Spillway, MI ............ 21-43 78. Fort Wayne Metro Area, IN ............ 21-43 79. Kawkawlin River, MI ................. 21-45 80. Saginaw River, MI .................. 21-45 81. Sebewaing River, MI ................. 21-47 82. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .................... 21-47 83. Other Authorized Flood NAVIGATION 1. ALPENA HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Thunder Bay River which empties into Thunder Bay, Lake Huron. Harbor is 100 miles southeast of Cheboygan Harbor, MI. River has its source in Montmorency and Alpena Counties, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14864.) Previous Project. For details see page 1957 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1548 of Annual Report for 1938. Flood Control (Continued) Page Control Projects .................... 21-47 84. Flood Control Under Special Authorization ...................... 21-47 85. Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters and International Water Studies ......... 21-48 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 86. St. Marys River, MI ................... General Investigations 87. Surveys ............................ 88. Preconstruction Engineering and Design ... 89. Collection and Study of Basic Data ....... 21-50 21-53 21-53 21-54 Tables Table 21-A Cost & Financial Statement ...... 21-55 Table 21-B Authorizing Legislation ......... 21-78 Table 21-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ...................... 21-94 Table 21-D Not Applicable Table 21-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ...................... 21-95 Table 21-F Multiple Purpose Projects, Including Power, St. Marys River, MI: Existing Project ............... 21-95 Table 21-G Deauthorized Projects ........... 21-96 Table 21-H Features of Existing Project ...... 21-99 Table 21-I Fox River, WI: Locks & Dams ... 21-100 Table 21-J Reconnaissance & Condition Surv..21-101 Existing Project. Provides for a bay channel 200 feet wide and 25 feet deep from deep water in Thunder Bay to a point 300 feet lakeward of the Alpena Light; thence an entrance channel 24 feet deep, narrowing to a width of 100 feet at a point 700 feet upstream from the light; a river channel 100 feet wide, 23 feet deep to Second Avenue Bridge; thence 18.5 feet deep and 75 feet wide for 1,600 feet to upper limit of Federal project; a turning basin at upstream end of project, basin at river mouth 19 feet deep, trapezoidal in shape, with a maximum width of 700 feet including the channel width and a maximum length of 900 feet along the channel line, including removal of existing rubble breakwater; and a breakwater 21-2 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT about 550 feet long paralleling lakeward side of new turning basin. Work authorized by the 1965 River and Harbor Act, which consists of the proposed turning basin and breakwater reconfiguration, was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) OF 1986; Public Law (PL) 99-662, November 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Several commercial docks along Thunder Bay River used primarily for receipt of coal and petroleum products. Also a municipal marina basin about 0.25 mile southwest of river mouth. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $10,498. Engineering and design for repair of the Rubblemound Breakwater was initiated at a cost of $41,740. Existing project was completed in 1939. The modification of existing project at Alpena Harbor, as authorized by the 1965 River and Harbor Act, was reclassified into an inactive status May 22, 1969 based on an unfavorable benefit-cost ratio. In 1975 the modification was recommended and reviewed for deauthorization, which was withdrawn by Congressional Resolution the same year. Subsequently, the work authorized by the 1965 Act was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986. Project features are in fair condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $1,461,156, of which $337,394 was for new work and $1,123,762 for maintenance. 2. ARCADIA HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 193 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 15 miles northerly from Manistee, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907). Existing Project. Provided for maintenance dredging of the existing harbor built by private interests, for a period of five years. The five years covered by this project were the calendar years 1905 to 1909, inclusive. Funds were also appropriated and maintenance was performed in calendar years 1911, 1912, 1913 and 1915, inclusive. There is at present no approved project for the improvement of this harbor. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. Dock facilities are considered adequate for existing recreational traffic. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $26,554. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $2,709. Repairs to the North and South Revetment were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $144,210. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for maintenance dredging, removing 5,500 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $32,900. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $44,823. Existing project was completed in 1909. Varying depths of 5-12 feet exist in the channel at present. Maintenance of the harbor is based on providing a 9-foot depth. Piers and revetments are in fair condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $5,124,883. 3. ASHLAND HARBOR, WI Location. At head of Chequamegon Bay, on south shore of Lake Superior, about 65 miles east of Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14974.) Existing Project. A west channel 20 and 21 feet deep and an east basin 25 and 27 feet deep, both all protected by an 8,000-foot breakwater. For additional details see page 1008 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. City of Ashland owns 4,150 feet 21-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 of waterfront for future public needs. Wharves for handling coal, ore, limestone, logs and pulpwood are served by railroads. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Handling of ore and logs has been discontinued for the present. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $1,269. Work authorized prior to 1960 Act was completed in 1950. Work authorized by 1960 Act was completed in November 1962. Navigation structures are in fair condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $5,885,792, of which $1,695,645 was for new work and $4,190,147 was for maintenance. 4. AUSABLE HARBOR AT AUSABLE RIVER (OSCODA), MI Location. The AuSable River and village of Oscoda, MI are on the west shore of Lake Huron, 8 miles north of AuSable Point, northeast limit of Saginaw Bay. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Previous Project. For details see pages 336 and 2453 of Annual Report for 1892. Existing Project. Riprapping outer 200 feet of north pier at mouth of AuSable River, dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep and dredging between piers and upstream to State highway bridge 10 feet deep. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, safety repairs, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $9,459. Existing project was completed in 1962. Piers and revetments are in fair condition, it is anticipated repairs will be required in the next several years. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $3,090,531, of which $209,776 was for new work (includes $16,400 contributed funds) and $2,880,755 for maintenance. 5. BLACK RIVER (PORT HURON), MI Location. This river has its source in the northern part of Sanilac County, MI, is about 60 miles long, and flows in a southeasterly direction into the St. Clair River. (See NOAA Nautical chart 14852.) Previous Project. For details see page 1441 of Annual Report for 1916, and page 1554 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Provides for a channel 20 feet deep from deep water in St. Clair River to the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Bridge, 160 feet wide at the mouth, decreasing to 100 feet, about 800 feet from the mouth, thence 100 feet wide for 2,600 feet, decreasing to 75 feet for a distance of 4,800 feet; widening two bends to 100 feet, one at the foot of 12th Street, and the other below the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Bridge; for a settling basin 75 feet wide and 20 feet deep, beginning at the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Bridge in Port Huron and extending upstream a distance of about 2,300 feet; and then for a distance of 2.6 miles as a 100-foot wide river channel, 8 feet deep to the I-94 bridge where it decreases to 6 feet deep and continues to the vicinity of the Black River Drainage Canal with suitable widening where required at bends in the channel. The project modification authorized by the Act of Aug. 30, 1935, is considered to be inactive and is excluded from the foregoing cost for new work. The cost of this modification was last revised in 1954 and was estimated to be $194,000 exclusive of $194,000 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are docks on both sides of Black River near its mouth, and between these docks and the upper limit of improvement there are 5 other docks varying in length from 100 to 500 feet. All docks are privately owned and are restricted to the use of the owners. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Public recreational boating facilities constructed by the State and local agencies are available, as are privately owned and operated marinas. 21-4 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $5,012. All work, except that authorized by Act of August 30, 1935, and the latest modification, has been completed. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $2,313,307, of which $830,165 was for new work (includes $349,921 contributed funds) and $1,483,142 for maintenance. 6. BLACK RIVER HARBOR (UPPER PENINSULA), MI Location. At mouth of Black River on south shore of Lake Superior 39 miles westerly from Ontonagon, MI, and 47 miles easterly from Ashland, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Existing Project. Two converging breakwaters, an entrance channel between breakwaters, an inner channel, and an irregular harbor basin. For additional details see page 1092 of Annual Report for 1966. Project depths are 12 feet in the approach channel and 8 feet in the river channel and basin. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests furnished easements on 0.85 acre of land. Terminal Facilities. Wharves constructed on both sides of river. Wharf on east bank has frontage of 400 feet; on west bank, a frontage of 750 feet. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $1,627. Project was completed in June 1958. Navigation structures range from fair to good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $1,390,551, of which $383,350 was for new work and $1,007,201 was for maintenance. The new work cost does not include $30,000 contributed funds. 7. CEDAR RIVER HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Cedar River on west shore of Green Bay, an arm of Northern Lake Michigan, about 68 miles north of City of Green Bay. Nearest harbors are Menominee, MI, 27 miles southwest and at Escanaba, MI, 20 miles northeast. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14909.) Existing Project. Two parallel entrance piers, a west pier 230 feet long and a rubblemound east pier 875 feet long with a sport fishing walkway; an entrance channel 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in Green Bay to mouth of Cedar River about 900 feet long; and inner channel in Cedar River 1,400 feet long, 80 feet wide, and 8 feet deep upstream to about 150 below State Route 35 bridge; and a turning basin 150 feet wide near upstream end of inner bridge channel. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. No local sponsor has been identified. The State of Michigan is awaiting completion of the limited Re-evaluation Report. Terminal Facilities. There are no permanent docking, mooring or handling facilities. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Engineering and design for repair of the East Pier was completed at a cost of $74,626. A contract was awarded for this work in the amount of $1,256,500. The contract was 20% complete at the end of the FY at a cost of $247,195. Engineering and design during construction cost $3,872. Supervision and administration of the contract cost $43,831. Engineering and design for repair of the West Pier was initiated at a cost of $5,245. Total cost to end of FY was $905,342 of which $408,000 was for new work and $497,342 for maintenance. 8. CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 276 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 75 miles northerly from Frankfort, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14942.) 21-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Existing Project. A channel 24 feet deep in Lake Michigan and a river channel 23 feet deep in the lower and upper channels connecting Lake Michigan with Lake Charlevoix via Round Lake. The channels are protected where needed by piers and revetments. For additional details see page 1476 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Section 25 of the WRDA of 1988 provides authorization pertaining to the South Pier to Charlevoix Harbor. It states, "The Secretary shall take such action as may be necessary to restore recreational uses established prior to May 1, 1988, or provide comparable recreation uses at the South Pier to Charlevoix Harbor project, Charlevoix, Michigan in order to mitigate any adverse impact on recreational uses resulting from reconstruction of the South Pier..." Local Cooperation. None required except the latest project modification is subject to the following: Provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-ways required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the modified project upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of excavated materials and any necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments, therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the constructing and maintenance of the modified project, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; provide and maintain without cost to the United States depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminal commensurate with the depths provided in the related project areas; accomplish, without cost to the United States, such alterations of submarine utility crossing as are required by the modified project; establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the harbor by users thereof which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control; if acquiring lands, easements and rights-of-ways for construction of the project, local interests will comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1971; PL 91- 646, approved January 2, 1971; contribute all costs in excess of $1,000,000 should the total cost of construction of the general navigation facilities exceed that amount, in accordance with provisions of Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. The total first cost of construction (1975) is estimated at $625,000. Terminal Facilities. Several small landing places in Round Lake at Charlevoix for handling fish and miscellaneous commodities, a wharf for petroleum products at west end of Lake Charlevoix, and coal wharves at Advance and Boyne City. Charlevoix, Boyne City, and East Jordan provide public docks for small craft. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $39,363. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $4,989. Obstruction removal was performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $70,188. Engineering and design for repair of North Pier, Sections A1-A2 & B, North Revetment, Sections C&D, were completed at a cost of $29,013. A contract for this work was awarded and completed this FY in the amount of $190,353. Engineering and design during construction cost $6,087. Real estate, and supervision and administration of the contract cost $35,126. Existing project was completed in 1939 except for the latest modification. Navigation structures are in fair condition with miscellaneous repairs scheduled in future years. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $11,662,224, of which $180,623 was for new work, $10,352,225 for maintenance (Bank Stabilization $46,352), and $1,129,396 for rehabilitation 9. CHEBOYGAN HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Cheboygan River which empties into Western Lake Huron about 16 miles southeast of the Straits of Mackinac Bridge. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14881 and 14886.) Previous Project. For details see page 1956 of 21-6 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT AnnualReport for 1915, and page 1546 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. A channel 21 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 21-foot contour in Lake Huron to outer end of west pier; thence, between lines parallel to and 25 feet from the docks, 21 feet deep from this point to East First Street and thence 18.5 feet deep and 60 feet wide from this bridge to the lock Cheboygan River; a turning basin 21 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 420 to 770 feet long on east side of existing project channel just below East First Street; and rubblemound breakwater about 775 feet long on the site of existing west pier at mouth of river. Project is 12,000 feet long, of which about 6,000 feet are in Straits of Mackinac. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Several privately owned wharves used for receiving coal, stone and petroleum products. Public recreational boating facilities constructed by the Sate and local agencies are available. These facilities satisfy existing commerce and vessel traffic. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $1,859. Navigation structures are in good condition. Total costs to end of FY were $1,531,596 of which $504,236 was for new work and $1,027,360 for maintenance. 10. CLINTON RIVER, MI Location. Has its sources in Oakland County, MI, flows easterly about 60 miles and empties into Anchor Bay in northwestern part of Lake St. Clair. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14850.) Previous Project. For details see page 1958 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1556 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. An entrance channel in Anchor Bay 8 feet deep, 300 feet wide at 8-foot depth contour in the bay, gradually decreasing to 50 feet wide at about 1,000 feet upstream from mouth of Clinton River, a length of about 4,600 feet; a channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide in the river about 38,700 feet long from entrance channel upstream to Mt. Clemens at Cass Avenue; closing old channel and making a cutoff at Shoemakers Bend; closing Catfish Channel; construction of revetments as needed in the river; and a harbor basin, 5 feet deep and 11 acres in area at entrance along bay channel, protected by breakwaters on north and south sides. (See Table 21- B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. River is used exclusively by recreational craft. There are numerous public and private wharves along the river below the city. They are considered adequate. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $22,775. Maintenance of the disposal area performed by hired labor cost $3,609. Existing project was completed in 1966. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $7,990,143, of which $549,798 was for new work (includes $289,752 contributed funds), $3,644,165 for maintenance and $3,796,180 for diked disposal. 11. CORNUCOPIA HARBOR, WI Location. At mouth of Siskiwit River on south shore of Lake Superior, 49 miles east from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14973.) Existing Project. Provides for an entrance channel between piers; an irregular-shaped turning basin; two inner channels, and reconstruction and Federal maintenance of deflection dike and entrance piers constructed by local interests. Project depths are 10 feet between piers and 8 feet in turning basin and inner channels. For additional details see page 1010 of Annual 21-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Report for 1965. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. About 1,000 linear feet of privately owned docking space is available. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $1,559. Work authorized by earlier Act was completed in 1939. Work authorized in 1954 was completed in 1963. Navigation structures are in fair condition, repairs will be scheduled in future years. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $1,642,868, of which $462,653 was for new work and $1,180,215 for maintenance. 12. DETROIT RIVER, MI Location. One of the Great Lakes connecting channels, 31 miles long, flows south from Lake St. Clair to Lake Erie. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14848.) Previous Project. For details see page 1958 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1541 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Improving Detroit River main channels to provide 25.5-foot draft navigation; improving certain auxiliary and side channels; and construction of various water level and crosscurrent control structures. Details are in accompanying Table 21-H. Project depths are referred to local low water datum planes which correspond to low water datums for Lakes St. Clair and Erie, 572.3 and 569.2 feet above mean water level at Rimouski, Quebec, IGLD 1985. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. No local cooperation is required for modifications authorized by Acts of July 1946 and March 1956. The uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1946 and the 1956 R & H Acts, construction of the Compensating Works, with the uncompleted portion of the Trenton Channel modification approved Aug. 13, 1968, were deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). Terminal Facilities. Numerous commercial installations used for handling coal, iron ore, limestone, steel products, petroleum products, and other items such as overseas general cargo. Detail on actual port and harbor facilities is in Port Series No. 45 (revised 1984) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, support of water control center, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $1,075,728. Location and removal of obstructions was performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MICHIGAN and the U.S. Cranebarge VELER at a cost of $1,097,226. Maintenance of disposal area was performed by hired labor and contract at a cost of $89,806. A contract for maintenance dredging Pointe Mouillee was awarded and completed this FY, removing approximately 52,500 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $191,299. Engineering, design, surveys, real estate, and supervision and administration cost $134,169. Latest modification of connecting channels project in the Detroit River is complete except for compensating works. Pertinent data concerning channels covered by project at end of FY are set forth in Table 21-H. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $241,171,505, of which $76,877,357 was for new work ($75,346,669 regular funds and $1,530,688 Public Works Funds), $121,823,563 (includes $361,235 Section 150 contributed funds) for maintenance and $42,470,585 for diked disposal. 13. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN AND WI Location. At extreme western end of Lake Superior. Cities of Duluth, MN, and Superior, WI, are on north and south sides, respectively. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14975.) 21-8 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT Previous Projects. See page 1246 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for rebuilding canal piers at Duluth entry, replacement or construction of piers and breakwater at Superior entry and dredging approaches and channels within harbor, St. Louis Bay, and St. Louis River. Channels vary in depth from 32 to 28 feet in entrances, are 27 feet deep in iron-ore route channels, and are from 20 to 23 feet deep in inner channels. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) For details of authorized channel dimensions and dimensions of structures, see pages 1246 and 1247 of Annual Report for 1962 and page 1011 of Annual Report for 1965. Portion of project for deepening Twenty-first Avenue West channel was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). The WRDA of 1986 authorized modifications to the project to deepen the western portions of North and South Channels, the entire Upper Channel and the Minnesota Channel to 27 feet LWD; widen the Cross Channel to provide a minimum turning basin of 1,500 feet; widen the bend at the Arrowhead Bascule Bridge to 600 feet; and construct an upland confined disposal facility. The current recommended plan involves only the mechanical dredging of the Cross Channel Turning Basin with disposal at the Erie Pier CDF. The remainder of the project is now unscheduled. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662), are as described in House Document 150, 86th Congress, 1st Session and also includes, as a result of PL 99-662, construction cost sharing. Terminal Facilities. There are 113 docks or terminals including some 54 major ones; all but one privately owned. Facilities for handling iron ore, coal, limestone, petroleum, steel and scrap iron, cement, general cargo, and grain are believed adequate for most existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the museum was performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $338,365. Operation and maintenance of service facilities and park pier performed by hired labor cost $188,924. Condition surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, support of water control center, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $327,149. Development of dredged material management plans continued at a cost of $195,670. Duluth and Superior Entry Breakwater repairs were performed using the U.S. Derrickbarge SCHWARTZ at a cost of $685,842. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor and contract cost $123,000. Maintenance of the disposal area performed by hired labor cost $1,763. Engineering and design for repair the South Pier, Sections R1-R4, was completed at a cost of $192,738. A contract for this work was awarded in the amount of $2,399,370. The contract was 48% complete at the end of the FY at a cost of $1,149,999. Engineering and design during construction cost $4,432. An adjustment of $188,990 was made in contract cost and 1,099 in cubic yards for the FY97 maintenance dredging contract completed last FY. A contract for dredging the outer harbor was awarded and completed this FY, removing 112,520 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $498,499. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $258,172. Funds in the amount of $4,843 were expended to begin a study for initial coordination and initial Appraisal Report under Section 204 Authority of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) 1992, as amended. Work authorized prior to 1960 Act was completed in June 1956. Under the 1960 Act, work on the outer harbor, included in House Document 150, was completed in June 1965. Work in the inner harbor, included in House Document 196, started in May 1963, was completed in November 1968 except for 21st Avenue West channel portion which was deauthorized December 31, 1989. Of the work authorized in WRDA 1986, only the Cross Channel dredging has been completed (September 1994). All other authorized improvements are unscheduled. The United States owns 34.90 acres of land in fee in Minnesota and Wisconsin of which 2.15 acres are used for a vessel yard. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $103,265,911, of which $17,226,343 was for 21-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 new work (includes $331,685 contributed funds), $72,927,909 for maintenance, $1,556,249 for diked disposal and $11,555,410 for rehabilitation. 14. FOX RIVER, WI Location. Rises in Columbia County, WI, and flows about 176 miles northerly into Green Bay. Wolf River, physically a main river but by designation a tributary of Fox River, rises in central part of Fort County, WI and flows southerly. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14916 for Lake Winnebago and lower Fox River.) Previous Projects. See page 1368 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Deepening and widening channel of Fox River from DePere 7 miles above mouth to confluence of Wolf River, a total length of 59 miles, to 6 feet, with 9.6 feet in rock cut below DePere lock and 7 feet in other rock cuts on lower river below Menasha lock; construction and reconstruction of 19 locks and 9 dams; a concrete retaining wall at Kaukauna; construction and maintenance of harbors having depths of 6 feet on Lake Winnebago; widening Neenah Channel to 100 feet, with a 6-foot depth for about 1 mile; and dredging, snagging, and otherwise improving Wolf River 47 miles from its mouth to New London, depth to be 4 feet. Cost of completed portion of project is $513, 424 for the lower river exclusive of previous projects. The uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1925, was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). Section 332 of the WRDA of 1992 authorized the transfer of the navigation system to the State of WI subject to agreement; however, water regulation and dam operation will be continued by the Federal government. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. Wharf and landing facilities are, in general, adequate for existing needs. (See Table 21-I on locks and dams, Fox River, WI.) Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental activities, safety training, miscellaneous inspections and reports, and plans for flood emergencies were performed at a cost of $414,239. Water control studies, monitoring and regulation of water levels were performed at a cost of $268,392. Real Estate activities were performed at a cost of $71,397. Federal canal banks at various locations were repaired at a cost of $77,216. The operation and maintenance of nine (9) dams and ten (10) overflow weirs and caretaker status maintenance of seventeen (17) locks and two (2) guard locks totaled $670,203. Supervision and administration costs were $49,149. Correction of design deficiencies identified by periodic inspections at Cedars, DePere, Kaukauna, and Little Chute Dams, and Little Kaukauna Lock cost $49,316. Preparation of plans and specifications for repair of the right abutment at Upper Appleton Dam continued this FY at a cost of $66,923. (This work began last FY at a cost of $3,687). The contract awarded last FY for repairs to the Upper Appleton Dam was completed this FY at a cost of $135,219. Engineering and design during construction cost $5,420. The contract awarded last FY to renovate Cedar Lock and Dam and Little Chute Locks and Dam continued at a cost of $802,997. The contract was 48% complete at the end of the FY. Engineering and design during construction for new gate hoist and electrical rehabilitation at nine (9) dams cost $17,836. Engineering and design for Canal Bank repairs cost $35,878. A contract for this work was awarded this FY in the amount of $178,621. The contract was 94% complete at the end of FY at a cost of $168,621. Supervision and administration of these contracts cost $135,568. Existing project is complete except for the inactive portion. Nineteen original locks and nine original dams have been rebuilt. (See Table 21-I for year of completion of each). Structures and dredging in pools have increased original depths generally about 2 feet. Work remaining to complete project consists of dredging in upper portion of Wolf River, and rock removal and deepening of Neenah Channel on lower Fox River, which are no longer considered necessary. The dams tainter gates are scheduled to receive new hoist mechanisms. Existing dams are generally fair to good; but many of the locks are in extremely poor condition. Only the most critical lock repairs are being made to maintain the pool 21-10 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT for industry and hydropower users. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $62,562,597, of which $3,753,334 was for new work and $58,809,263 for operation and maintenance. Funds in the amount of $3,706,187 were expended between July 5, 1884, and June 30, 1935, on operation and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 15. FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 204 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 28 miles northerly from Manistee, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907.) Existing Project. Provides for constructing an exterior basin in Lake Michigan formed by two breakwaters, 450 feet apart at the outer ends, diverging at an angle of about 90 degrees, the main arm and shore connection on north breakwater are 972 and 1,000 feet long, respectively, and the main arm and shore connection of south breakwater 1,188 and 1,400 feet long, respectively; for removing 801 feet of north pier and 1,172 feet of south pier; dredging basin 20 feet deep and 800 feet wide at entrance, decreasing toward new pier heads to 600 feet wide, dredging approach and entrance channel through outer basin to a depth of 24 feet from deep water in Lake Michigan to a point 500 feet landward of opening between breakwaters, over the entire width outside the breakwaters; thence to maximum width of 500 feet inside the breakwaters and to 23 feet deep through inner portion of outer basin to outer end of north pier, over widths decreasing from 500 to 160 feet; and thence to 22 feet deep between the piers to the inner basin in Lake Betsie; dredging an 18- foot deep interior basin in Lake Betsie from within 50 feet of existing structures on the west and extending eastward about 1,550 feet to easterly boundary and from within 50 feet of existing structures on the north and extending southward 800 feet to the southerly boundary; dredging a recreational craft anchorage area 10 feet deep and 300 feet wide, extending 600 feet eastward of the east limit of the interior basin, with its north side in line with the north limit of the basin. Breakwaters and shore connections are built of concrete caissons and piling capped with concrete. Inner piers and revetments are built of stonefilled timber cribs and piling, all capped with concrete, except for 476 feet of south revetment which consists of steel sheet piling. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Two car ferry slips on south shore and several docks along north shore of Lake Betsie. The City and State provide a recreational docking facility on north side of Lake Betsie which is open to all on equal terms. There is also a marine railway capable of handling small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $37,919. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $2,680. Repairs to the North Breakwater, Sections C&D, were performed using the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $188,614. Real estate and supervision and administration cost $12,329. Existing project was completed in 1939, with exception of the latest modification which was completed in 1969. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1474 of Annual Report for 1962. Navigation structures are in fair condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $13,561,212, of which $1,955,159 (includes $31,709 contributed funds) was for new work, $10,126,777 for maintenance, $1,204,500 for diked disposal and $274,776 for rehabilitation. 16. GRAND HAVEN HARBOR AND GRAND RIVER, MI Location. Harbor is on east shore of Lake Michigan, 108 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 23 miles northerly from Holland, MI. River rises in Jackson County, MI, and flows 260 miles westerly into Lake Michigan. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14933, and Geological Survey Grand Rapids quadrangle.) Previous Project. For details see page 1949 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1481 of Annual Report for 1938. 21-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Existing Project. An entrance channel protected by parallel piers and revetments at mouth of Grand River, a deep draft channel in river extending to Spring Lake, a turning basin, and a shallow draft channel in river extending 14.5 miles upstream to Bass River. Project depths are 23 feet in entrance channel, 21 feet in river to turning basin, 18 feet in turning basin and channel to Spring Lake, and 8 feet in upper Grand River channel. For additional details see page 1461 of Annual Report for 1962. Dredging on northerly side of inner channel is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $38,600. The WRDA of 1986 authorized modifications to deepen the harbor entrance and river channels to 29 and 27 feet, respectively; and provides for a new and larger turning basin. Estimated cost (Oct 90) is $20,400,000, which includes $11,754,000 Federal and $8,646,000 non-Federal. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portions of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662), are as described in House Document 661, 76th Congress, 3d Session, and also includes, as a result of PL 99-662, construction cost sharing requirements as follows: a. Contribute in cash 25 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, exclusive of aids to navigation, a contribution presently estimated at $4,246,000. The estimated cash contribution of $4,246,000 to be paid in lump sum, prior to initiation of construction, or in annual installments during the construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed or scheduled expenditure of Federal funds as required by the Chief of Engineers, or under another arrangement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; and b. Repay, with interest, over a period of up to 30 years following project completion, 10 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, an amount presently estimated at $2,040,000. The Secretary of the Army may count against all or part of the 10 percent repayment, the amount of the local contribution of lands, easements, rights-of-ways, dredged/demolition material disposal sites and relocations. In no case are these costs to count against the cash payment during construction, and in no case would the amount waived exceed 10 percent of project cost. Terminal Facilities. Several wharves exist for handling coal, limestone, sand and gravel, petroleum products, fish, and miscellaneous commodities. There is also a car ferry slip which is inactive. The State and local agencies provide recreational boating facilities which are open to all on equal terms. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, confined disposal facility monitoring, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $232,472. Development of dredged material management plans continued at a cost of $127,613. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $12,461. Repair of the North Pier and Revetment, Section A, and East & South Pier, Section I, were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $205,649. Maintenance of the confined disposal facility by hired labor cost $74,286. A contract for maintenance dredging the inner harbor was awarded and completed this FY at a cost of $342,999, removing 39,733 cubic yards of shoal material. Option year 2 of FY96 contract for maintenance dredging the outer harbor was canceled this FY due to lack of shoaling. Contractor mobilization and demobilization cost $17,650. This contract was also for Section 111 beach nourishment. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, supervision and administration cost $212,682. Monitoring in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 was performed at a cost of $49,947. Beach nourishment in conjunction with above maintenance dredging outer harbor contract was also canceled. Contractor mobilization and demobilization cost $4,413. Supervision and administration under Section 111 cost $6,435. Existing project was substantially completed in 1949. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1463 of Annual Report for 1982. Structures are in a general state of deteriorating condition and are scheduled for repairs. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $37,247,860, of which $1,458,469 was 21-12 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT for new work, $34,195,378 for maintenance (includes $15,585 contributed funds), $780,400 diked disposal and $813,613 for rehabilitation 17. GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MI Location. On the south shore of Lake Superior, 93 miles west of Sault Ste. Marie, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14962.) Existing Project. Provides for a channel protected by parallel piers and for closing natural entrance channel with a pile dike. Project depths are 18 feet between piers and 20 feet in lake approach. For additional details see page 1449 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. Several small piers, a Coast Guard Station, and a small boat pier and launching ramp built by the State of Michigan provide facilities adequate for present traffic. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $9,412. Existing project is complete except for widening a portion of channel from 250 to 300 feet. Project now being maintained to 19 and 15 feet below I.G.L.D., in lieu of 20 and 18 feet, which is adequate for current usage. The Pile Dike Breakwater is severely deteriorated and no longer maintained, major repair is required to make the Breakwater functional. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $3,688,078, of which $1,055,871 was for new work and $2,632,619 for maintenance. 18. GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI Location. At mouth of Fox River, at head of Green Bay, about 180 miles from Milwaukee, WI, via Sturgeon Bay Canal, and about 49 miles southwest of Menominee Harbor, MI and WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14918.) Previous Projects. See page 1366 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. See Chicago District 1979 Annual Report, Table 30-C, page 30-30. For more detailed description of project see page 1216 of Annual Report for 1963. Cost of completed portion of project is $9,335,000 Federal, and non-Federal cost is $490,000 including $100,000 contributed funds. Local interests requested that the inactive portion of the 1962 River and Harbor Act, consisting of dredging the reach from 150 feet downstream of the Chicago & Northwestern Railway Bridge to 1,700 feet upstream of this bridge, be reactivated and the authorization modified to include deepening the adjacent turning basin and modifying the Chicago & Northwestern Railway Bridge to provide increased horizontal clearance. Estimated cost of this portion (1990) is $6,130,000; $4,030,000 Federal and $2,100,000 non-Federal which includes $1,970,000 local contribution. Section 601c of the WRDA of 1986 authorized deepening the Fox River Channel, Green Bay, WI, to 27 feet. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for existing project. Terminal Facilities. There are 16 wharves for handling coal, petroleum products, cement, limestone, general overseas cargo and miscellaneous commodities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $521,829. Development of dredged material management plans was initiated at a cost of $191,640. Maintenance of the disposal area cost $1,662. The contract awarded last FY for maintenance dredging the outer harbor was completed this FY at a cost of $723,370, removing approximately 117,262 cubic yards of shoal material. A contract was awarded this FY for maintenance dredging the outer harbor in the amount of $1,513,900. The contract was 38% complete at the 21-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 end of FY, removing approximately 76,000 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $578,998. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, supervision and administration cost $165,778. Engineering and design for construction of a confined disposal facility continued at a cost of $96. Existing project is complete. The 1962 modification was started in November 1966 and completed in September 1973, except for dredging the reach from 150 feet downstream of the Chicago & Northwestern Railway Bridge to 1,700 feet upstream of this bridge. Dredging of the turning basin above C & N.W. Railway Bridge was commenced in August 1938. The turning basin was enlarged under authority of Section 5 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of March 4, 1915, in order to provide sufficient area for the large ships that use it. The work was performed as part of a maintenance dredging contract in September and October 1973. East revetment at Grassy Island was entirely removed in July 1935. Dredging Fox River and entrance channel to Tail Point Light was completed in September 1967. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $57,131,901 ($56,191,101 regular funds and $940,800 Public Works Funds), $9,946,395 for new work, $39,281,195 for maintenance and $7,904,311 for diked disposal. The new work cost does not include $100,000 contributed funds. 19. GREILICKVILLE HARBOR, MI (Formerly Traverse City Harbor, MI) Location. On Lake Michigan at the south end of the West Arm of Grand Traverse Bay, about 45 miles southwesterly from Charlevoix and 29 miles northeasterly from Frankfort. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14913.) Existing Project. Provides for dredging a basin 600 feet wide and about 850 feet long with a depth of 14 feet in outer 350 feet of the area and a 10-foot depth in remainder, protected by a steel sheet pile breakwater about 1,300 feet long with a 300-foot long rubblemound extension along a line bearing south 60 degrees west from outer end of steel structure and a detached rubblemound breakwater 420 feet long along south side of the basin. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. An existing public wharf (built in connection with the 1948 authorization), a boat launching ramp, and a small privately operated yacht harbor located beyond the limits of the existing project. The existing public wharf deteriorated from lack of maintenance and must be rebuilt. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $8,040. Existing project was completed in August 1951. The last modification was completed during FY 1967. Controlling depths are 14 feet in the outer basin and 10 feet in the inner basin. Navigation structures are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $675,567, of which $369,557 was for new work and $306,010 for maintenance. The new work does not include $121,000 contributed funds. 20. HAMMOND BAY HARBOR, MI Location. On northwest shore of Lake Huron, 35 miles southeast of Straits of Mackinac. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14881.) Existing Project. Provides for a harbor of refuge, protected by breakwater structures, extending to 12-foot depth contour in the lake; for dredging a harbor basin 10 feet deep; and for dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Public facilities being planned by State and local agencies. Plans and specifications are complete, but construction has not started. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: 21-14 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT Condition surveys were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $4,212. The existing project was completed in 1965. Navigation structures are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $2,156,254, of which $1,092,366 was for new work, and $1,063,888 for maintenance. 21. HARBOR BEACH HARBOR, MI Location. On west shore of Lake Huron about 60 miles north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing Project. Harbor of refuge protected by three breakwaters; a main entrance 23 feet deep; and an anchorage area 21 feet deep. For additional details see page 1485 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21- B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. Coal and limestone are received at a private wharf. In addition, there is a public recreational craft pier, a Coast Guard pier, and several small installations engaged in docking and servicing light-draft commercial and recreational vessels. These facilities satisfy current commerce and traffic requirements. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $49,583. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY, removing approximately 58,730 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $413,642. Engineering, design, and supervision and administration cost $64,999. Existing project was completed in 1928. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1485 of Annual Report for 1962. Navigation structures are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $16,986,159, of which $1,200,598 was for new work, $15,347,957 for maintenance, $243,100 for diked disposal and $194,504 for rehabilitation. 22. HARRISVILLE HARBOR, MI Location. On the west shore of Lake Huron, 20 miles north of Oscoda and 30 miles south of Alpena. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14864.) Existing Project. A harbor of refuge protected by breakwater structures, and dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep and a harbor basin 10 feet deep. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Dockage facilities built by State and local agencies for recreational craft; considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $4,515. Navigation structures are in fair condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $4,049,839, of which $2,639,392 was for new work (includes $287,454 contributed funds) and $1,410,447 for maintenance. 23. HOLLAND HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan 95 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 23 miles southerly from Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14932.) Previous Project. For details see page 1948 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1478 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. An outer breakwater protected approach channel in Lake Michigan, an entrance channel to Lake Macatawa protected by piers and revetments, a channel through Lake Macatawa into Black River, and a turning basin. Project depths are 23 feet in outer portion of approach channel decreasing to 21 feet at outer end of 21-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 inner piers, 21 feet to upper end of project, and 18 feet in turning basin. For additional details see page 1458 of Annual Report for 1962. The uncompleted portion of the project, widening bend of entrance channel into Lake Macatawa, was deauthorized Dec, 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portions of project. Terminal Facilities. Wharves are at inner end of Lake Macatawa and used for handling coal, building materials, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. Two shipbuilding yards are on south shore of the lake. Holland provides a public wharf for small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $152,500. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $5,196. Obstruction removal was performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $13,614. Option year 2 of FY96 contract was awarded and completed this FY for maintenance dredging the outer harbor, removing 23,623 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $94,871. This contract was also for beach nourishment. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $36,760. Monitoring in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 was performed at a cost of $39,599. Beach nourishment in conjunction with the above maintenance dredging outer harbor contract cost $19,431. Supervision and administration under Section 111 cost $2,999. Existing project, with exception of widening bend in revetted entrance channel authorized by Act of September 3, 1954, was completed in 1957. For additional details on completion of existing project, see page 1460 of Annual Report for 1962. Navigation structures are in fair condition with repairs anticipated within the next 5 years. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $30,745,189, of which $1,392,827 was for new work ($1,180,502 regular funds, $176,620 for previous project and $35,705 contributed funds), $27,186,610 for maintenance, $1,663,300 for diked disposal and $502,452 for rehabilitation. 24. THE INLAND ROUTE, MI Location. A series of interconnected lakes and streams stretching across northern tip of Lower Peninsula of Michigan, and extends from Conway near Lake Michigan to Cheboygan on Lake Huron; a distance of 35 miles. Crooked and Indian Rivers are connecting channels in the waterway. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14886.) Existing Project. Provides for a channel 30 feet wide and 5 feet deep, with necessary widening at bends, through Crooked and Indian Rivers, and Crooked, Burt, and Mullett Lakes, and from Conway (west end of Crooked Lake) to navigation lock at Cheboygan; in Pickerel Channel from Pickerel Lake to Crooked Lake. It also provides for suitable jetties at head of Indian River. The addition of a lock and dam was approved by the Chief of Engineers on Sep. 2, 1964, to correct a design deficiency. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. None exist for commercial cargohandling along the Crooked and Indian Rivers. Numerous small privately owned timber piers and wharves, some equipped with covered boat wells for serving and storing recreational craft, have been constructed. Landings maintained by hotel and resort operators are open to the public for transfer of passengers. Public docks are at Conway and Oden on Crooked Lake; the village of Indian River, Topinabee, and Mullett Lake Village on Mullett Lake; and at Cheboygan. About 30 highways dead end at water's edge, permitting public access for various marine activities. Dock facilities are considered adequate for existing traffic. 21-16 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: The navigation lock was operated and maintained by the State of Michigan at no cost to the Government. In FY 98, the lock was operated from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. April 25-26, May 2, 3, 9, 10, 16 &17, September 14- 27. The lock was operated 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. May 23-25, June 1-30, and 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. September 1-13. The lock was operated from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. July 1 - August 31. In October, the lock was open on weekends only from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. The lock closed for the season on October 11. Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $23,918. The existing project was completed in 1958. The lock and dam was completed in FY 1968. For additional details see page 1382 of Annual Report for 1960. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $4,125,955, of which $918,222 was for new work (includes $148,000 contributed funds), $2,803,433 for maintenance, and $404,300 for diked disposal 25. KENOSHA HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 35 miles south of Milwaukee and about 54 miles north of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14904.) Previous Project. See page 1390 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. For detailed description see page 1237, Annual Report for 1963. Estimated (1986) Federal cost is $455,000 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects, and $195,000 non- Federal which includes $155,000 local contribution. (See Table 21-B for authorization legislation.) The uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act, dredging of 25-foot wide strips adjacent to the north and south piers, was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Three wharves used for miscellaneous foreign overseas commodities and autos, and also several fish wharves. While these facilities are considered generally adequate for existing commerce, more efficient use of existing terminals and utilization of available frontage for development of additional terminals should be made. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $25,525. Materials purchased and stockpiled for future repairs cost $36,051. Existing project is complete except for dredging 25-foot strips adjacent to the north and south piers which was deauthorized December 31, 1989. The north and south piers were completed in 1900 and the breakwater in 1909. Navigation structures range from fair to good condition, Detached North Breakwater needs repair. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $13,511,498 ($13,483,840 were regular funds and $27,658 Emergency Relief Funds), of which $988,969 was for new work, $6,873,654 for maintenance, $4,378,600 for diked disposal and $1,270,275 for rehabilitation. The new work cost does not include $3,000 contributed funds. 26. KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan, about 105 miles north of Milwaukee, WI, and about 78 miles from Green Bay, via Sturgeon Bay Canal. Harbor is at mouth of Kewaunee River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14908.) Previous Projects. See page 1375 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. See Chicago District 1979 Annual Report, Table 30-C, page 30-31. Costs of completed project are $603,021 Federal, and $9,000 non-Federal, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. Uncompleted portion (estimated $200,000, July 1965) of 1935 River and Harbor Act is considered inactive, and excluded from present cost estimate. The portion authorized by the 1960 River and 21-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Harbor Act was deauthorized in 1977. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Two car-ferry slips, a petroleum tank farm, a Corps of Engineers project office, and several fish wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $84,886. Repairs to the South Pier, Sections B, D &D 1, were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $133,195. Maintenance of the diked disposal facility was performed by hired labor at a cost of $1,097. Supervision and administration cost $1,606. Active portion of existing project is complete. The north pier was completed in 1897 and the remaining portion is in generally good condition. Rehabilitation of the south pier was completed in June 1967. Construction of north breakwater and shore connection, except for a gap of 150 feet about 830 feet from shoreward end, and removal of outer 706.5 linear feet of north pier was commenced in September 1935 and completed in June 1937. Removed 500 linear feet of north pier in April/May 1963 and widened and deepened the adjacent channel in 1965. Outer end of the north pier was struck and severely damaged by car ferry vessel in October 1973 and a 24-foot section at outlet end was subsequently removed, thus reducing the structure to a length of 626 feet. Dredging entrance channel in interior basin to existing project depth was commenced in April and completed in October 1938. Kewaunee River is navigable to about 6.5 miles above mouth for craft drawing not more than 4 feet. Navigation structures range from fair to good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $11,830,177, of which $758,333 was for new work ($338,333 regular and $420,000 Emergency Relief Funds) $7,493,083 for maintenance, $2,961,461 for diked disposal and $617,300 for rehabilitation. 27. KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI Location. In Lake Superior across Keweenaw Peninsula in upper peninsula of Michigan. The west entrance is 169 miles east of Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14972.) Existing Project. A navigable channel, minimum width 300 feet, 25 miles long, partially natural and partially artificial, across Keweenaw Peninsula via Portage Lake. For details see page 1121 of Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) The uncompleted portion of the project for navigation at Keweenaw Waterway, Houghton County, MI, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of Aug. 30, 1935, PL 409, 73rd Congress, which consists of extending the lower entrance breakwater by 2,000 feet, including the necessary alteration or replacement of structures due to channel deepening, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986; PL 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. Six coal docks, a petroleum dock, and several general merchandise and miscellaneous wharves, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Also present is a government constructed recreational area with facilities to include a picnic area and small boat landing range. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $115,635. Upper Entry Breakwater repairs were performed using the U.S. Derrickbarge SCHWARTZ at a cost of $352,952. Real estate and supervision and administration cost $15,046. Active portion of the project is complete. Lower entry piers are in fair condition, it is anticipated repairs will be required within the next ten years. Upper entry breakwaters are in good condition, but require annual stone maintenance due to severity of the wave climate. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $34,586,759, of which $5,974,141 was for new work, 21-18 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT $27,089,118 for maintenance and $1,523,500 for diked disposal. 28. KNIFE RIVER HARBOR, MN Location. Near mouth of Knife River on north shore of Lake Superior, 19 miles northeasterly from Duluth, MN, and 7 miles southwest of Two Harbors, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14966.) Existing Project. Provides for an entrance channel with a system of overlapping breakwaters, using the existing breakwater and a new breakwater constructed of 731 feet of rock rubblemound. The entrance channel is 9 feet deep and an inner straight channel is 8 feet deep, 50 feet wide, and 600 feet long with a public marina and side channel at its inner end. For additional details see page 1110 of Annual Report for 1963. A modification to correct a design deficiency was authorized in 1974. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Local interests are to furnish easements on 15.08 acres of land. Terminal Facilities. Local interests have installed pile-and-timber docks on both sides of straight channel. Lake County has completed construction by contract of a marina along the east wing of the inner harbor. Operations During Fiscal Year. New Work: The design deficiency plans developed in response to the 1974 authorization were reviewed and a Design Review Report was prepared at a cost of $97,518. The report recommended a rubblemound breakwater at a total cost of $5,000,000. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $628. Project was completed in June 1958. Breakwater is in fair condition. The existing breakwater does not effectively prevent waves caused by northeasterly winds from entering the entrance channel. This results in unsatisfactory and unsafe harbor entrance conditions during storms. Mooring conditions in the main channel and Y-branches of the inner harbor are also adversely affected. Plans and specifications for the construction of a breakwater to correct a design deficiency to reduce wave damage and improve navigation conditions were completed and approved by NCD in 1982. Total project costs to end of FY were $821,346, of which $510,463 was for new work and $310,883 for maintenance. 29. LAC LA BELLE HARBOR, MI Location. On the south shore of Lake Superior on the eastern shore of Keweenaw Peninsula, 41 miles northeasterly from Portage entry to Keweenaw Waterway. Lac La Belle, Bete Grise Bay, and Mendota Ship Canal combine to form the harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14964.) Existing Project. Provides forconstruction of two parallel piers at the entrance having lengths of 484 and 682 feet for north and south piers, respectively; for an entrance channel between the piers to feet wide and 12 feet deep, about 820 feet long with a flared approach; and for an inner canal 50 feet wide and 10 feet deep, about 730 feet long. For additional details see page 1039, Annual Report for 1964. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Several small, privately owned wharves are available in the harbor for use of small craft engaged in fishing and recreational activities. A State owned dock for small craft is located at the northwest corner of Lac La Belle Bay. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $1,323. The South Breakwater was stabilized using the U.S. Derrickbarge SCHWARTZ at a cost of $20,102. The existing project was completed in 1960. Controlling depths are about 11 feet in the approach channel and 10 feet in the inner channel. Navigation structures range from fair to good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $1,012,141, of which $269,270 was for new work and $742,871 for maintenance. The new work does not include $38,190 contributed funds. 21-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 30. LAKE ST. CLAIR, MI, CHANNELS IN Location. Lake St. Clair, a section of Great Lakes connecting channels, is an expansive shallow basin having a vessel track length of about 15 miles from mouth of St. Clair River to head of Detroit River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14850.) Previous Project. For details see page 2882, Annual Report for 1896; pages 1957-58, Annual Report for 1915; and page 1539, Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. An improved channel through Lake St. Clair 800 feet wide, 27.5 feet deep, and about 14.5 miles long; extending from mouth of Southeast Bend cutoff channel at lower end of St. Clair River to head of Detroit River Channel. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. None. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, support of the water control center, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $40,629. Maintenance of the confined disposal facility by hired labor cost $1,005. Real estate cost $1,005. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $21,567,144, of which $7,675,357 was for new work ($6,666,762 regular funds and $1,008,595 Public Works Funds), $8,771,987 for maintenance, and $5,119,800 for diked disposal. 31. LELAND HARBOR, MI Location. A light-draft harbor on eastern shore of Lake Michigan at mouth of Carp River, about 40 miles north of Frankfort, MI, and 40 miles southwest of Charlevoix, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14912.) Existing Project. Provides for a harbor of refuge consisting of a breakwater about 1,200 feet long, a protected anchorage and maneuver area about 3 acres in extent and 10 feet deep, a 12-foot deep flared approach channel decreasing in width to 90 feet, an existing south pier 440 feet long, a 35-foot long cellular extension to south pier, an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide extending to mouth of Carp River, and for elimination of existing north pier. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Privately owned wharves on each side of river below the dam which is 400 feet above the river mouth. These wharves serve the local fishing interests and recreational craft. Public facilities are operated by the State and local agencies. All available dockage space is utilized. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $22,545. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $2,722. Repairs to the South Pier, Section C, were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $126,464. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging, removing 12,939 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $54,817. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $50,636. The existing project was completed in 1932 except for the 1962 authorization which was completed in 1967. Navigation structures are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $4,552,141, of which $1,027,089 was for new work (includes $354,139 contributed funds), $3,454,374 for maintenance and $70,678 for rehabilitation. 32. LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI Location. On southwest shore of Lake Huron, 20 miles north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) 21-20 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT Existing Project. Provides for two offshore breakwaters opening to the southeast and totaling about 2,400 feet long with provisions for recreational fishing on the main breakwater; an anchorage and maneuver area of about 5 acres, 8 feet deep; and a flared approach channel 10 feet deep, decreasing to 160 feet in width through the breakwaters. Project also provides for recreational fishing facilities. Estimated (1979) Federal cost of new work is $1,647,306 excluding $1,088,888 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation were furnished by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources to the Secretary of the Army. The cash contribution was $1,088,888. Terminal Facilities. An existing public fishing pier of open pile construction is not adequate for existing and prospective commerce. Complete boating facilities are planned by State and local agencies in connection with the harbor construction. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Environmental studies performed by contract cost $34. Safety repairs performed by hired labor cost $179. Monitoring in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90- 483 was performed by government forces at a cost of $19,051. The existing project was completed during FY 1977. Navigation structures are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $5,911,448, of which $3,107,192 (includes $1,088,888 contributed funds) was for new work and $2,804,256 for maintenance. 33. LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior 21 miles west of Whitefish Point and 30 miles east of Grand Marais, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14962.) Existing Project. Provides for a small-craft harbor of refuge by dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep from Lake Superior into Little Lake, suitably protected by breakwaters and revetments. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Only terminal facility at project consists of a public dock built by the State of Michigan for light-draft craft. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $13,406. A multi-year contract was awarded this FY for maintenance dredging. The FY98 basic requirement was terminated for the government's convenience. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $47,016. This project is considered complete; however, because of shifting sand, the harbor entrance shoals rapidly with the result that full project depth is not usually available. Navigation structures are in fair condition. West Breakwater has deteriorated with stone migrating into navigation channel. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $5,087,680, of which $600,478 was for new work (includes $57,670 contributed funds) and $4,487,202 for maintenance. 34. LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 156 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 67 miles northerly from Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14937.) Previous Project. For details see page 1951 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1491 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 1307 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing Project. Provides for an exterior basin in Lake Michigan protected by north and south breakwaters, north breakwater is 1,800 feet long and south breakwater 1,700 feet long, 550 feet apart at outer ends, diverging at an angle of 90 degrees, with shore connections, 1,103 and 2,004 feet long, respectively; for dredging exterior basin to 18 feet deep with a maximum width of 1,500 21-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 feet; for a channel with a depth of 29 feet from deep water in Lake Michigan decreasing to 27 feet at the west end of the north pier, over a maximum width of 600 feet; thence a channel with a depth of 27 feet, over a minimum width of 230 feet with necessary widening at Pere Marquette Lake; and for inner piers and revetments, 1,649 feet long on north and sufficiently long on the south for turn at Pere Marquette Lake. The estimated (1977) Federal cost for new work is $8,250,000. Estimated total cost for local interests is $147,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. In addition to main terminal of Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company consisting of three car ferry slips, a wharf, and warehouses, there are several wharves which handle coal, limestone, and miscellaneous commodities. Facilities adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $109,822. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $4,031. Engineering and design for repair of the North Breakwater, Section B, continued at a cost of $86,524. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY, removing approximately 74,496 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost $493,261. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $63,035. Monitoring in connection with Section III of P.L. 90-483 was performed at a cost of $29,920. Existing project was completed in 1918. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1469 of Annual Report for 1962. The North Breakwater ranges from fair to good condition and is scheduled for repair. Overall structures are in fair condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $27,618,168, of which $8,532,202 was for new work, $18,728,053 for maintenance, and $357,913 for rehabilitation. The maintenance cost does not include $136,286 contributed funds. 35. MANISTEE HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 179 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 26 miles northerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14938.) Previous Project. For details see page 1952 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1493 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. An entrance channel in Lake Michigan protected by a breakwater, piers, and revetment; a channel in Manistee River to Manistee Lake; and Federal participation in cost of replacing Maple Street Bridge. Project depths are 25 feet in entrance channel and 23 feet in river channel. For additional details see page 1470 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Installations are on both sides of river and on Manistee Lake. Commerce handled includes coal, sand, salt, and general cargo. In addition, there is a Government wharf and a State and City owned recreational craft pier which is open to the public. These facilities satisfy current commerce requirements. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $75,895. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $10,517. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY, removing approximately 69,485 cubic yards of shoaled material at a cost of $330,107. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $55,287. Existing project was completed in August 1967. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1470 of Annual Report for 1962. Navigation structures range from generally fair to good condition. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $15,818,588, of which $2,696,522 was for new work, $11,747,902 for maintenance, and $1,374,164 for rehabilitation. 21-22 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT 36. MANISTIQUE HARBOR, MI Location. On the north shore of Lake Michigan, 135 miles northeasterly from Green Bay Harbor, WI, and 220 miles northerly from Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14908.) Previous Projects. For details see page 1933 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1422 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. A breakwater protected entrance channel in Lake Michigan, a channel in Manistique River, and a pier at river mouth. Project depths are 19 feet in outer portion of entrance channel, 18 feet in inner portion of entrance channel, and 18 feet in river channel. For additional details see page 1452 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. A car ferry slip, two coal and building material wharves, two fishing wharves, and numerous lumberyard slips. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $6,211. Engineering and design for repair of the East and West Breakwater, Sections F,E,C & D, continued at a cost of $107,235. Navigation structures are in generally poor condition and are scheduled for major repair. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $4,109,856, of which $1,299,355 was for new work, $2,494,168 for maintenance and $316,333 for rehabilitation. 37. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 79 miles north of Milwaukee, WI, and about 106 miles from Green Bay Canal. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14922.) Previous Projects. See page 1379 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. The total estimated (Oct. 1981) project cost is $3,080,000; the Federal cost is $1,085,000 and non-Federal cost is $1,995,000, which is a cash contribution. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C. For detailed description see page 1228 of Annual Report for 1963. Estimated costs (1970) of new work for 1968 modification are $81,000 Federal and $30,000 non- Federal which includes a cash contribution of $18,000. Work on the 1968 modification was postponed until 1982. The portion authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Construction of a small boat harbor within the existing harbor was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, June 26, 1979, and 720-foot channel extension affirmed in July 1982, under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed modifications. For 1968 modification local interests must make an annual cash contribution equivalent to 50% of the annual costs associated with construction and maintenance of the channel extension until such time that a second user utilizes the channel extension. Such a contribution is presently estimated at $9,206; additional assurances require that the sponsor provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of dredged materials, and the necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads and embankments therefor or the costs of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and subsequent use, operation, and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; provide and maintain without cost to the United States adequate berthing areas at the docks adjacent to the improvement; accomplish at no cost to the United States all relocations 21-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 and alterations of utilities necessary for the project; assume full responsibility for all project first costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $2,000,000; and comply with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970. Terminal Facilities. Three car-ferry slips, a grain elevator, one shipbuilding yard, and three other wharves used for handling coal, building materials, cement, and miscellaneous commodities. While these facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce, it is believed the city should provide a suitable wharf with warehouse and railway connection open to the general public. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $104,386. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $4,208. Minor confined disposal facility repairs cost $689. Repairs to the South Breakwater, Sections B, E & F, were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $90,722. Supervision and administration cost $10,520. Existing project is complete except for the 1962 and 1968 modifications. The 1962 modification was deauthorized December 31, 1990. Work on the 1968 modification was essentially completed in FY 83. The Federal modification, adopted July 15, 1985, included the expansion of the new entrance channel to the Section 107 project and extension of the rubblemound breakwater. Dredging a channel through the outer basin to existing project depth and removal of a portion of old north stub pier at the river entrance were completed in December 1937. Dredging river channel was completed in July 1942. South Breakwater, Section E, is in fair condition and is programmed for repair. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $15,847,518, of which $3,960,044 was for new work (includes $1,911,130 contributed funds), $8,805,718 for maintenance (includes $47,860 contributed funds), and $3,081,756 for diked disposal. 38. MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI Location. In Marquette Bay on south shore of Lake Superior, 160 miles west of Sault Ste. Marie, MI, and 265 miles east from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14970.) Existing Project. Provides for a breakwater, and a harbor basin 26.5 feet deep, giving a protected area of 350 acres. Project was modified in 1960 to provide a 27- foot depth in harbor area. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required for earlier authorizations. Fully complied with for the 1960 Act. Terminal Facilities. One ore dock, unused at present; two coal docks; one petroleum dock; and three other unused docks. There are also several small fish wharves without railroad connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $8,627. Repairs to the Breakwater, Section H, were performed using the U.S. Derrickbarge SCHWARTZ at a cost of $221,645. Real estate and supervision and administration cost $7,868. Navigation structures are in fair condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $4,890,538, of which $1,282,893 was for new work, $3,141,888 for maintenance and $465,757 for rehabilitation. 39. MENOMINEE HARBOR AND RIVER, MI AND WI Location. On Lake Michigan at the mouth of Menominee River on the western shore of Green Bay, 16 miles northwest of the mouth of Sturgeon Bay, and 49 miles northeast of Green Bay Harbor, about 155 miles from Milwaukee via Sturgeon Bay Canal. The river forms the boundary between the commercial harbors at Marinette, WI, and Menominee, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14917.) Previous Projects. See page 1361 of Annual Report for 1962. 21-24 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT Existing Project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-26. For detailed description see page 1214, Annual Report for 1963. The portion authorized by 1960 River and Harbor Act is inactive and estimated (1964) at $442,000 Federal, and $105,000 non-Federal. Costs of completed new work, exclusive of inactive work and amount expended on previous projects, are $221,053 Federal and $40,762 non-Federal, which includes a cash contribution of $36,762. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal Facilities. There are 9 wharves for handling coal, limestone, pulp and miscellaneous commodities. City of Marinette, WI, provided a public wharf. Facilities are considered fairly adequate for existing commerce, except that there is need for a public wharf owned by city of Menominee, with warehouse and railway connection. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $40,696. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $4,068. The project in effect prior to the modification of March 2, 1945, was completed in 1938. No additional work was necessary under the modification of March 2, 1945, to provide a depth of 12 feet in the extension of the channel to the vicinity of the Marinette Yacht Club, as project depth or more was available. The entrance piers were completed in 1884, were rehabilitated (1954-1964) and are in excellent condition. Dredging of the channel below the Marinette municipal wharf, together with enlarging the turning basin to existing project depth, was commenced in May 1938. Modification of the project authorized by the 1960 River and Harbor Act is inactive. Construction for the 1967 modifications was started August 17, 1968, and completed in October 1968. Navigation structures are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $5,475,969, of which $570,238 was for new work (includes $36,762 contributed funds), $2,960,219 for maintenance, $593,660 for diked disposal and $1,351,852 for rehabilitation. 40. MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 85 miles north of Chicago, IL, and about 83 miles west of Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14924.) Previous Projects. See page 1385 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-26. For detailed description see page 1232 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed new work costs are $6,934,804 Federal and $478,000 non-Federal, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. The uncompleted portion authorized by the 1935 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). Uncompleted portion of 1945 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in 1977. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Complied with for Acts of March 2, 1945, October 23, 1962, and July 14, 1960, except deauthorized portion of 1945 Act. Act of Aug. 30, 1935, provided that original dredging of outer harbor area be done by city of Milwaukee and city of Milwaukee be reimbursed at actual cost but not to exceed 10 cents per cubic yard, place measurement, for original dredging done subsequent to authorization of work by Congress. Agreement covering dredging was executed by Secretary of War, Feb. 23, 1934, after this work was originally authorized as part of public works program. City was reimbursed for 10 percent of dredging. Terminal Facilities. There are 4 car-ferry slips, and 57 other wharves, private and municipal, used for handling coal, grain, building materials, cement, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. As facilities in inner harbor were inadequate for existing commerce, Milwaukee Harbor Commission has constructed nine docks in the outer harbor for handling general cargo. 21-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $284,491. Development of dredged material management plans continued at a cost of $222,360. The contract awarded last FY for repair of the South Breakwater, Section E, Riprap, was completed this FY at a cost of $394,390. Engineering and design during construction cost $8,706. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $1,200. Repairs to the North Detached Breakwater, Section B3, were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $339,432. Real estate, and supervision and administration cost $103,754. Existing project is complete except for inactive portions. The 1962 modification was completed in July 1967. North breakwater and shore connection, 9,954 feet long, was completed in August 1925. North pier was completed in 1905 and construction of south pier was completed in November 1910. Construction of south breakwater and shore connection was completed in October 1929. Before modification of August 30, 1935, City of Milwaukee also dredged most of the area in the outer harbor south of inner entrance piers and lakeward of pierhead line to more than 21 feet below datum without cost to the United States. City of Milwaukee also dredged a portion of the area of the outer harbor north of inner entrance piers to provide an approach channel to the passenger and auto pier opposite East Claybourn Street. Work on the 1945 modification was completed in August 1957, except for the uncompleted portion which consists of dredging the Milwaukee River from Buffalo Street to upper limit of the project at Humboldt Avenue. The uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1945 Rivers and Harbors Act was deauthorized in 1977. Navigation structures range from fair to good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $73,030,379, of which $8,231,024 was for new work, $45,702,870 for maintenance (includes $322,471 contributed funds), $6,380,925 for diked disposal and $12,715,560 for rehabilitation. 41. MONROE HARBOR, MI Location. On lower reach of River Raisin, which empties into Lake Erie and is 36 miles south of Detroit, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14830.) Existing Project. Provides for a channel in Lake Erie and River Raisin to city of Monroe, for a turning basin, and for riprapping protecting dikes at river mouth. Project depths are 21 feet to turning basin, 18 feet in turning basin, and 9 feet to upstream end of project. For additional details see page 1490 of Annual Report for 1962. Project feature for riprapping protecting dikes is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this feature (1954) is $90,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) The WRDA of 1986 authorized modifications to deepen the River Raisin portion of the existing 200-foot navigation channel from 21 to 27 feet between existing turning basin and the river's mouth; deepen the lake channel from 21 to 28 feet, and widen the channel from 200 to 500 feet, for a distance of approximately 47,000 feet from the river's mouth to the Maumee Bay Entrance Channel; dredge a new turning basin 24 feet deep, with a diameter of at least 1,600 feet, at the river's mouth; and construct a 190 acre confined disposal area in Plum Creek Bay behind which would enable the creation of a 700 acre marsh. Estimated total cost (Oct. 88) is $150,200,000; $59,000,000 Federal and $91,200,000 non-Federal, which includes a cash contribution of $19,650,000. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662), are as described in the Rivers and Harbors Committee Document 22, 71st Congress, 1st Session; R & H Comm. Doc. 12, 72d Congress, 1st Session, and 45, 75th Congress, 1st Session, and also includes, as a result of PL 99-662, construction cost sharing as follows: a. Contribute in cash 25 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, exclusive of aids to navigation, a contribution presently estimated at $19,650,000. The estimated cash contribution of $19,650,000 to be paid in lump sum prior to initiation of construction, or in annual installments during the construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed or scheduled expenditure of Federal funds as required by the Chief of Engineers, or under another 21-26 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT arrangement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; b. Repay, with interest, over a period of up to 30 years following project completion, 10 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, an amount presently estimated at $7,860,000. The Secretary of the Army may count against all or part of the 10 percent repayment, the amount of the local contribution for lands, easements, rights-of-way, dredged/demolition material disposal sites and relocations. In no case are these costs to count against the cash payment during construction, and in no case would the amount waived exceed 10 percent of project cost; and c. The confined dike area construction is a non- Federal responsibility and is estimated to cost $70,156,000. Terminal Facilities. Several privately owned docks and a municipal terminal. Port of Monroe Authority built a steel and concrete wharf on southeast side of turning basin for commercial use. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, Hi-Fix surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $46,334. Maintenance of the confined disposal facility performed by hired labor cost $6,010. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded in the amount of $482,150. The contract was 9% complete at the end of the FY, removing approximately 13,514 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $42,570. Engineering, design, surveys, real estate, and supervision and administration cost $101,164. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $60,228,885, of which $987,340 was for new work (includes $300,000 contributed by the Port Commission of Monroe), $20,551,963 for maintenance (includes $166,667 contributed funds: $125,000 by Consolidated Paper Company and $41,667 by River Raisin Company) and $38,689,582 for diked disposal (includes $83,182 contributed funds). 42. MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 114 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 80 miles easterly from Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical chart 19434.) Previous Project. For details see page 1950 of Annual Report for 1915; page 1399, Annual Report for 1924; and page 1484, Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. A breakwater protected outer basin in Lake Michigan and an entrance channel from Lake Michigan to Muskegon Lake protected by piers and revetments. Project depths vary from 29 feet in the lakeward portion of the outer basin to 27 feet in the channel between the inner piers to Muskegon Lake. For additional details see page 1303 of Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Several privately owned wharves primarily for commercial use. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series, No. 48 (revised 1981) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $157,868. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $9,141. Repair of the North Breakwater and North Revetment was performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $130,544. Supervision and administration cost $1,382. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging contract to be awarded next FY was initiated at a cost of $5,637. Under Section 111 of P.L. 90-483, a contract for beach nourishment (trucking) was awarded and completed this FY at a cost of $155,599. Supervision and administration of the contract cost $1,808. Existing project, including latest project modification, was completed in 1965. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1465 of Annual 21-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Report for 1962. Navigation structures are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $30,274,264, of which $3,017,110 was for new work, $13,432,854 for maintenance, and $13,824,300 for rehabilitation. 43. NEW BUFFALO HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Galien River on southeast shore of Lake Michigan in Berrien County, about 45 miles easterly from Chicago, IL. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14905.) Existing Project. Provides for an entrance channel 10 feet deep by 80 feet wide and 850 feet long, to mouth of Galien River; new north and south breakwaters 1,305 and 740 feet long, respectively, and deepening inner channel to Galien River to 8 feet and 80 feet wide and 1,250 feet long. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. One village owned boat ramp and three privately operated marinas, and a private boat club facility. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $9,674. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $9,566. Existing project is complete. The South Breakwater is in fair condition, it is anticipated repairs will be required within the next five years. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $7,706,197, of which $2,472,184 was for new work (includes $1,186,467 contributed funds), $5,052,513 for maintenance, and $181,500 for diked disposal. 44. OCONTO HARBOR, WI Location. On the west shore of Green Bay, about 31 miles northeasterly from Green Bay Harbor, WI, and about 25 miles southwesterly from Menominee Harbor, MI and WI, at mouth of Oconto River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14910.) Previous Project. For details see page 1187 of Annual Report for 1958. Existing Project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. For detailed description see page 1187, Annual Report for 1958. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Two municipally owned wharves of 400 and 100 feet frontage, respectively, for miscellaneous freight, open to general public use. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $7,878. Navigation structures are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $2,393,586, of which $130,754 was for new work and $2,262,832 for maintenance. 45. ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI Location. About 140 miles east of Duluth, MN, on south shore of Lake Superior, at mouth of Ontonagon River; provides the only refuge for small craft between the Keweenaw Waterway upper entrance and Black River Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Previous Project. For details see page 1931 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1406 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Provides for approach channel 16 feet deep, a channel between piers with 17- and 15-foot depths, an inner basin 12 feet deep, and maintenance of channels, basin, and entrance piers. Completed project cost $19,619. See page 1100 of Annual Report for 1966 for details. A modification authorized by 1962 River and 21-28 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT Harbor Act provides for increasing depths of channels, construction of an inner basin and a sedimentation basin. (See Table 21-B for authorized legislation.) The turning basin feature of the project for navigation at Ontonagon Harbor, Ontonagon County, MI, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1962, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986; PL 99-662 (Section 1002) Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. The channel modification project authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. There are no publicly owned wharves. There are three coal wharves, an oil receiving facility, and a few small fish wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $42,608. An adjustment of -$16,092 was made in cost for materials used to repair the East Breakwater, Extension of Section A, performed last FY. Engineering and design for repair of the East Pier, Section B, and Wave Attenuator, was completed at a cost of $59,127. A contract for this work was awarded and completed this FY at a cost of $241,999. Option year 2 of FY96 maintenance dredging contract was awarded and completed this FY, removing approximately 10,217 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $228,965. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $53,158. All work authorized under previous Acts was completed in 1938. Navigation structures range from fair to good condition, East Breakwater repairs are scheduled. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $22,959,286, of which $953,903 was for new work, $21,984,383 for maintenance and $21,000 for diked disposal. 46. PENTWATER HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 146 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 14 miles southerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907.) Existing Project. Provides for widening old entrance channel to 150 feet between parallel piers and revetments, channel to extend from Lake Michigan to Pentwater Lake, with a depth of 16 feet. Piers and revetments are built of stone filled timber cribs and piling and capped with concrete. The 200-foot extension to south pier portion of project is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion is $65,100. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. Several small privately owned wharves on west end of Pentwater Lake. The City and Michigan Waterways Commission jointly constructed a dock on northwest side of Pentwater Lake for public use. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $41,720. Engineering and design for repair of the North Pier and Revetment, Sections A-D, F, Fl, (Phase II) continued at a cost of $95,290. The contract awarded last FY for repair of the South Pier and South Revetment, Sections B, F-H, J, (Phase I) continued at a cost of $1,099,999. Engineering and design during construction for this work cost $23,388. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $1,089. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed, removing 16,453 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $59,359. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $236,150. Existing project was completed in 1959 except for a 200-foot extension to the south pier which is not considered necessary under present conditions. For additional details see page 1468 of Annual Report for 1962. North Pier and Revetment are in poor condition and scheduled for major repair. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $9,796,668, of which $179,899 was for new work, and $9,616,769 for maintenance. 21-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 47. PETOSKEY HARBOR, MI Location. This harbor is on the east shore of Lake Michigan about 50 miles south of the Straits of Mackinac. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14913.) Previous Project. For details see page 1954 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1547 of Annual Report for 1931, and page 2024 of Annual Report for 1949. Existing Project. Provides for a breakwater extending from shore 1,345 feet long of stone-filled timber crib, concrete capped, and rubblestone construction which protects the municipal pier. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. There is a municipal pier which is about 635 feet long plus several recreational craft piers. These installations satisfy current commerce and traffic requirements. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $313. Repair of the Breakwater, Sections A, B & C, were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $111,133. Supervision and administration cost $2,627. The existing project was complete in 1938. Breakwater is in fair overall condition with repairs scheduled. Total cost of the existing project to the end of FY was $849,246 of which $123,839 was for new work and $725,407 for maintenance. 48. POINT LOOKOUT HARBOR (AU GRES RIVER), MI Location. At Au Gres River on westerly shore of Lake Huron at entrance to Saginaw Bay, about 17 miles northeast of mouth of Saginaw River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing Project. Provides for construction of a small boat harbor having a 12-foot deep, 100-foot wide, 2,800-foot long outer entrance channel; a 5,600- foot long, 100-foot wide inner entrance channel having a 10-foot depth;, an 8,270-foot long, 6-foot deep river channel ending just downstream from U.S. 23 highway bridge and having a width of 60 feet; a 4,000-foot long north breakwater and a 3,800-foot long south breakwater. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Small boat marina facilities are under construction by the State of Michigan. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $11,871. Existing project was completed in 1974. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $6,719,249 of which $2,642,584 was for new work, $3,955,065 for maintenance (includes $9,257 contributed funds) and $121,600 for diked disposal. 49. PORT AUSTIN HARBOR, MI Location. On west shore of Lake Huron at extreme southeastern limit of Saginaw Bay, and 29 miles south of AuSable River (Oscoda). (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing Project. A harbor of refuge at the mouth of Bird Creek, consisting of a harbor basin dredged to a depth of 10 feet protected by a breakwater structure, and for dredging an entrance channel to the harbor basin to a depth of 12 feet. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys performed by Government forces cost $1,040. Navigation structures are in good condition. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $5,424,316, of which $3,363,334 was for new work (includes $172,100 21-30 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT contributed funds), $1,901,982 for maintenance and $159,000 for diked disposal. 50. PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI Location. On southwest shore of Lake Huron, 30 miles north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing Project. Provides for a harbor of refuge protected by breakwater structures extending to 12-foot depth contour in lake; for dredging a harbor basin 10 feet deep; for dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep; a 70-foot extension of the south breakwater; a 300-foot arm added to the north breakwater; and riprap placed at the lakeward side of the breakwater addition. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There is one privately owned dock used principally as a fishing terminal by owner and a municipally owned Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Safety repairs performed by hired labor cost $1,857. The project was completed in 1951 except for latest modification which was completed in FY 76. The breakwaters are in good condition, with miscellaneous repairs programmed in the next 5 years. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $5,325,861, of which $1,733,071 was for new work (includes $487,108 contributed funds), $3,583,632 for maintenance (includes $115,000 contributed funds) and $9,158 for diked disposal. 51. PORT WASHINGTON HARBOR, WI Location. On the west shore of Lake Michigan, about 53 miles south of Manitowoc and about 29 miles north of Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14904.) Previous Project. For details, see page 1938 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1459 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 30-14 of Chicago District Annual Report for 1975. Existing Project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. Construction of a small boat harbor within the existing harbor was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, June 12, 1975, under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There is one coal wharf, a petroleum tank farm and several fishing wharves. City provided a wharf which is open to public use. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $40,223. Repair of the South Breakwater, Sections A-J, were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $124,685. Supervision and administration cost $827. The existing project was completed in 1936. The 1958 modification was deauthorized in 1977. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $7,475,828, of which $4,206,204 was for new work (includes $1,624,000 contributed funds), $3,259,003 for maintenance and $10,621 for diked disposal. 52. PORT WING HARBOR, WI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior, 34 miles easterly from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14966.) Existing Project. Provides for two parallel piers at entrance, 835 and 1,017 feet long, respectively, 200 feet apart; an entrance channel between piers 150 feet wide with 15-foot depth; an irregular-shaped turning basin 15 feet deep at inner end of piers from which two inner channels with 8-foot depth extend. One of these is 60 feet wide extending southerly for 340 feet and one 70 feet wide extending easterly 1,170 feet. 21-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Portion of dredging entrance channel to complete project width and depth is considered unnecessary to meet present navigation requirements. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are four privately owned fishing wharves which are considered adequate for existing conditions. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $6,770. Repairs to the East Pier and Revetment were performed using the U.S. Derrickbarge SCHWARTZ at a cost of $83,005. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY, removing approximately 18,543 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $109,761. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $53,316. Existing project is complete, except channel between piers, and has been dredged to only a 100-foot width. Widening the channel an additional 50 feet was considered unnecessary to meet present navigation requirements. That work was classified inactive and deauthorized on August 5, 1977, under Section 12 of Public Law 93-251. Land owned by the United States totals 7.80 acres. Navigation structures are in fair condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $1,506,004, of which $63,393 was for new work and $1,442,611 for maintenance. 53. PORTAGE LAKE HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan about 186 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and about 37 miles northerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14939.) Existing Project. Provides for a harbor of refuge with an entrance channel from Lake Michigan to Portage Lake protected by piers and revetments. Project depth is 18 feet. For additional details see page 1297 of Annual Report for 1958. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. There are landing places and marinas at inner end of Portage Lake. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $36,411. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $2,028. Engineering and design for repair of the North and South Piers, Sections A&B, continued at a cost of $45,854. Supervision and administration to closeout maintenance dredging contract completed last FY cost $6,355. Existing project was substantially completed in 1912. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1298 of Annual Report for 1958. Navigation structures are in generally poor condition and are scheduled for major repair. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $3,130,900 of which $256,129 was for new work and $2,874,771 for maintenance. 54. PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior at Marquette, MI. It is an indentation about 1.5 miles long and one-half mile wide in shore behind Presque Isle Point. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14970.) Existing Project. A breakwater off Presque Isle Point and dredging harbor to depth of 28 feet at inner portion with 30 feet at entrance. For details see page 1021 of 1965 Annual Report. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. One merchandise and petroleum receiving wharf and one ore dock. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. 21-32 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and environmental studies were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $19,534. Navigation structures are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $3,182,595, of which $1,252,192 was for new work, $1,837,403 for maintenance, $16,500 for diked disposal and $76,500 for rehabilitation. 55. ROUGE RIVER, MI Location. Rises in Oakland and Washtenaw Counties, MI, 30 miles long, flows southeasterly through Wayne County, and joins Detroit River at westerly limit of city of Detroit. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14854.) Previous Project. For details see page 1530 of Annual Report for 1932, and page 1558 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Provides for: (a) Main channel from Detroit River through Short Cut Canal extending to upstream limit of the project, a distance of 3.5 miles. Project depths are 25 and 21 feet in navigation channel, 21 feet in turning basin, and 13 feet in upper reach of project. (b) Old Channel from Detroit River extending to junction of Old Channel with Short Cut Canal. Project depths are 25, 18, 17, and 21 feet. For additional details see page 1324 of Annual Report for 1963. In 1973, work authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act was reclassified from the active to inactive category. Estimated cost (1972) of this work is $880,000. Except for dredging 25-foot channel 1,150 feet upstream from mouth of Old Channel, work authorized in Act of Aug. 30, 1935, is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1958) of inactive portion is $255,000. Work authorized by Act of July 3, 1958, is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1960) of this work is $210,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Act of Oct. 23, 1962, requires local interests to provide lands and rights-of-way for construction upon request of the Chief of Engineers; hold the United States free from damages; provide terminal facilities to accommodate prospective commerce considered in report of District Engineer; dredge and maintain areas between the Federal improvement and terminal facilities to depths commensurate with improved Federal channel; make alterations in docks, bulkheads and other structures, and take such other measures as may be necessary to assure stability of banks adjacent to channel; and provide bridge protection. The assurances of local cooperation for the River and Harbor Act of 1962 were furnished by the Michigan State Waterways Commission and accepted on Jan. 7, 1965. Fulfillment of all items of local cooperation has not been accomplished. Terminal Facilities. Numerous large commercial docks for handling various type cargo. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are contained in the Port Series No. 45 (revised 1984) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $110,676. The maintenance dredging contract awarded last FY was completed this FY, removing approximately 43,489 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $310,973. Surveys and supervision and administration cost $36,664. Work authorized before 1962 modification is complete or deauthorized. For additional details on completion of existing project see Annual Report for 1962. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $38,162,329, of which $675,251 was for new work ($29,563 was expended from Emergency Relief Act Funds), $22,579,760 for maintenance and $14,907,318 for diked disposal. 56. SAGINAW RIVER, MI Location. Formed by union of Tittabawassee and Shiawassee Rivers, 22 miles long, and flows northerly into extreme inner end of Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron. Cities of Saginaw and Bay City are on the river. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14867.) 21-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Previous Project. For details, see page 1957 of Annual Report for 1915; and page 1550 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Provides for an entrance channel 27 feet deep and 350 feet wide from 27-foot contour in Saginaw Bay to river mouth; thence a channel 26 feet deep and 200 feet wide to New York Central Railroad Bridge at Bay City; thence 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide to C&O Railroad Bridge in Saginaw; thence 16.5 feet deep and 200 feet wide to upstream limit at Green Point. Project also provides for five turning basins; one 25 feet deep at Essexville, 600 feet wide with a maximum length of 1,850 feet; one 22 feet deep on east side of channel about 1 mile upstream from Cass Avenue in Bay City, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; one 20 feet deep at Carrollton, 100 to 300 feet wide and 900 feet long; one 20 feet deep downstream from C&O Bridge in Saginaw, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; and one 15 feet deep between Bristol Street Bridge and New York Central Railroad Bridge in Saginaw. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Numerous large commercial docks for handling a great variety of cargo. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series No. 45 (revised 1984) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, support of water control center and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $495,066. Development of dredged material management plans continued at a cost of $59,927. Minor confined disposal facility repairs performed by hired labor cost $1,453. An adjustment of 15,949 was made in cubic yards to complete the maintenance dredging contract awarded last FY. A contract for maintenance dredging of the Bay and River was awarded this FY in the amount of $1,450,150. The contract was 30% complete at the end of FY, removing approximately 38,938 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $430,999. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $125,472. Construction of a diked disposal area for Upper Saginaw was dropped from the diked disposal program in FY97 due to the decline in PCB levels. Project no longer requires confinement. Existing project is complete except for small part of the work authorized by the Act of October 23, 1962. Section D (Sixth Street Turning Basin) of the 1962 Act is complete except for the channel portion, which is pending modification. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $92,592,397, of which $14,930,727 was for new work (includes $13,600 for contributed funds), $56,709,782 for maintenance, and $20,951,888 for diked disposal. 57. ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI Location. A 40 mile long section of Great Lakes connecting channels which flows southerly from Lake Huron and discharges into Lake St. Clair. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14852.) Existing Project. Provides for channels through St. Clair River, which, at low water datum, are suitable for vessels drawing 25.5 feet. Project also provides for improvement of North Channeloutlet, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep, for recreational craft. Project depths are referred to low water datums for Lakes Huron and St. Clair; 577.5 and 572.3 feet above mean water level at Rimouski, Quebec, IGLD 1985. (See Tables 21-B and 21-H for authorizing legislation and features of existing project.) Act of July 24, 1946, provides for widening and deepening of southeast bend and improvement of outlet of north channel at an estimated cost (1986) of $870,000; $435,000 Federal and $435,000 non-Federal. On June 16, 1969, the Director of Civil Works approved substitution of the middle channel of the St. Clair River for the authorized north channel. Subsequently, however, the work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of July 24, 1946, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986; PL 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. This improvement serves through commerce, between the upper and lower Great Lakes, 21-34 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT and has not materially influenced terminal facilities along its route. A number of privately owned piers and wharves are at Port Huron, Marysville, St. Clair, and Marine City, MI, which handle coal, limestone, petroleum products, wood-pulp, salt and general cargo. These installations satisfy present commerce requirements. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, support of water control center and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $130,849. Location and removal of obstructions was performed using the U.S. Cranebarge VELER at a cost of $655,718. Real estate and supervision and administration cost $26,380. Existing project is complete. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $45,821,739, of which $19,213,246 was for new work and $26,608,493 for maintenance. 58. ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 60 miles easterly from Chicago, IL, and 24 miles southerly from South Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14930.) Previous Project. For details see page 1945 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1470 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Provides for protecting mouth of St. Joseph River by two piers, 250 to 325 feet apart at their inner and outer ends, respectively, having lengths of 2,758 feet on north side and 2,603 feet on south side; for a channel 21 feet deep from Lake Michigan to mouth of Benton Harbor Canal, a length of about 6,900 feet with widths of 265 feet at outer end of piers, 190 feet at inner end of piers and revetments, thence generally 215 feet to lower end of turning basin, increasing to 250 feet above the turning basin to mouth of Paw Paw River, thence generally 110 feet in Paw Paw River to mouth of Benton Harbor Canal; for dredging channel in Benton Harbor Canal up to west line of Riverview Drive extended northerly, to 18 feet deep and 80 feet wide; and a turning basin 18 feet deep on north side of channel above mouth of Morrison Channel and a'turning basin 18 feet deep near mouth of Paw Paw River. Public Law 88-88 declared a portion of Benton Harbor Canal a non-navigable stream. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Several commercial wharves for handling coal, building materials, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. A package freight terminal and a public docking facility is also available. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $119,965. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $12,943. Obstruction removal was performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $10,666. An adjustment of -$4,043 was made in contract cost for FY97 maintenance dredging of the inner harbor completed last FY. A contract for maintenance dredging the outer channel was awarded and completed this FY, removing 24,285 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $117,723. This contract was also for beach nourishment. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $78,818. Environmental activities for a disposal area and polluted dredged material continued at a cost of $260,384. Monitoring in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 cost $55,188. Beach nourishment in conjunction with the above maintenance dredging of the outer channel contract awarded and completed this FY cost $29,431. A contract for beach nourishment (trucking) was awarded this FY in the amount of $251,200. The contract was 75% complete at the end of the FY at a cost of $189,999. Engineering, design, surveys and supervision and administration under Section 111 cost $26,502. Existing project was completed in 1956. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1454 of Annual Report for 1962. The structures are in generally good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $30,875,053, of which $1,804,485 was for new work, $27,470,276 for 21-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 maintenance, $638,076 for diked disposal and $962,216 for rehabilitation. 59. SAUGATUCK HARBOR AND KALAMAZOO RIVER, MI Location. Harbor is on east shore of Lake Michigan, 90 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 22 miles northerly from South Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14906.) Previous Project. For details see page 1947 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1475 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Entrance channel protected by parallel piers at mouth of Kalamazoo River and a river channel to village of Saugatuck, MI. Project depths: 16 feet in entrance channel, 14 feet in river channel. Additional details on page 1456 of 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. At city of Saugatuck, MI, there are several landing places for recreational craft and one for small commercial vessels. At village of Douglas, MI, there is a landing pier. Facilities are considered adequate for present traffic. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $75,662. Safety repairs performed by hired labor cost $2,676. Engineering and design for repair of the North and South Pier, Sections A-G, continued at a cost of $24,175. Close-out of maintenance dredging contract completed last FY cost $5,995. Existing project was completed in 1903. Navigation structures are in generally poor condition and are scheduled for major repair. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $4,826,764, of which $364,527 was for new work and $4,462,237 for maintenance. 60. SAXON HARBOR, WI Location. On the south shore of Lake Superior in Wisconsin at the mouth of Oronto Creek, 27 miles southeast of the harbor at Bayfield, WI, and 21 miles westerly of the harbor at Black River, MI; 99 miles east of Duluth-Superior Harbor and 60 miles west of Ontonagon Harbor, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Previous Project. For details see page 1254 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for east and west breakwaters, an outer channel 10 feet deep, an inner basin and side channel 8 feet deep, and diversion of Oronto Creek to Parkers Creek by three short reaches of channel excavation and a levee. For detailed dimensions of features see pate 1025 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. One wharf 300 feet long on the east side of present harbor basin constructed by local interests. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, confined disposal facility monitoring, and inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $18,146. Concrete repairs to the East and West Breakwater were performed using the U.S. Derrickbarge SCHWARTZ at a cost of $89,318. Real estate and supervision and administration cost $5,871. The project was completed in March 1968. A reconnaissance report was completed in August 1971 concerning erosion of the shoreline west of the harbor. Navigation structures are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $1,673,327, of which $711,777 was for new work and $961,550 for maintenance. The new work cost does not include $50,193 contributed funds. 21-36 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT 61. SEBEWAING RIVER, MI Location. At mouth of Sebewaing River on south shore of Saginaw Bay about 10 miles south of Bay Port, MI. (NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Previous Project. For details see page 1007 of Annual Report for 1912. Existing Project. Provides for an entrance channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 15,000 feet long in Saginaw Bay. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Terminal Facilities. A number of small wharves used by fishing vessels and other light-draft craft are along the river. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $1,483. Existing project was completed in 1903. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $4,031,866, of which $35,573 was for new work and $3,996,293 for maintenance. 62. SHEBOYGAN HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 26 miles south of Manitowoc and about 55 miles north of Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14922.) Previous Project. See page 1381 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. For detailed description see page 1230 of Annual Report for 1963. New work for project as completed cost $648,271, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Three wharves for handling coal, petroleum products and miscellaneous commodities. City provided a public wharf. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $105,830. Repairs to the South Pier, Sections J, K & L, were performed using the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $83,877. Real estate and supervision and administration cost $4,517. Existing project was completed in 1904. Construction of north breakwater was commenced in October 1913 and completed in October 1915. Dredging entrance channel to existing project depth was commenced in June and completed in July 1938. Work on 1954 modification was completed in December 1956. Inner 260 feet of south pier was replaced with a revetment by private interests under permit granted July 16, 1931, by the Secretary of War. Piers, therefore, are maintained only for a length of about 2,490 feet. Sheboygan River is navigable about 2.4 miles above its mouth for craft drawing not more than 2 feet. Navigation structures range from fair to good condition. It is anticipated repairs will be required in the next 5 to 7 years. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $10,926,288, of which $1,136,088 was for new work, $9,181,172 for maintenance, $907,792 for diked disposal and $609,028 for rehabilitation. 63. SILVER BAY HARBOR, MN Location. The city of Silver Bay, MN, is situated on the north shore of Lake Superior about 50 miles northeast of Duluth, MN. The proposed harbor of refuge is located between the Northshore Mining taconite processing facility and the city's water intake plant. The project site includes approximately 21.5 acres and includes over 2,000 feet of shoreline. Existing Project. The project was authorized under the River & Harbor Act 1945, House Document 446-78- 2. The project is a Harbor of Refuge for small boats navigating the north shore of Lake Superior. This harbor will be part of a system of small craft harbors of refuge at 30 to 40 mile intervals between Duluth and Grand 21-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Marais, Minnesota. The 1994 Appropriations Act for Energy and Water Development provided $2.6 Million Federal funds for the project. The State of Minnesota will provide the funds for the non-Federal share. The project will repair/improve an existing breakwater and construct an additional adjacent breakwater. Local Cooperation. The State of Minnesota is the non-Federal sponsor, acting through the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MDNR). The state provided all the required documentation and plans and specifications to the Detroit District for review, and the district awarded and is managing the construction. Operations During Fiscal Year. A total of $1,185,089 was expended this FY to complete the construction of the project. Of the funds expended $688,628 was contributed by MDNR. Total cost to end of FY was $3,819,979. 64. SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 77 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 24 miles northerly from St. Joseph, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14906.) Previous Project. For details see page 1947 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1473 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. An entrance channel protected by parallel piers and revetments at mouth of Black River, a river channel and a turning basin. Project depths are 21 feet in entrance channel and 19 feet in river channel and turning basin. For additional details see page 1455 of Annual Report for 1962. The turning basin feature was subsequently deauthorized by Section 116 of the WRDA of 1992 (PL 102-580). (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Several wharves for handling coal, building materials, wood-pulp, fish, and miscellaneous commodities; two have warehouses. Facilities satisfy current commerce requirements. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $12,012. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $9,421. Engineering and design for repair of the North Pier, Sections A-C (Concrete Caps), was initiated at a cost of $32,260. Under Section 111 of P.L. 90-483, a contract for beach nourishment (trucking) was awarded in the amount of $289,200. The contract was 66% complete at the end of the FY at a cost of $189,999. Existing project was completed in 1960. Project now being maintained to 14-foot and 12-foot depths, respectively (in lieu of the 21 feet and 19 feet authorized), which is adequate for current usage. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1456 of Annual Report for 1962. Navigation structures range from fair to good condition and are scheduled for repair. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $10,571,214, of which $984,426 was for new work, $7,912,331 for maintenance, $42,381 for diked disposal and $1,632,076 for rehabilitation. 65. STURGEON BAY AND LAKE MICHIGAN SHIP CANAL, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 52 miles northeast of Green Bay and about 128 miles north of Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14919.) Previous Project. See page 1373 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 31-C, page 30-27. For detailed description, see page 1223, Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. As the canal and connecting channel is a through waterway, only terminal facilities are in city of Sturgeon Bay, 4 miles from west end of revetted portion of canal. These facilities consist of two wharves for handling coal, petroleum products and miscellaneous commodities, and four shipbuilding yards. 21-38 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT City of Sturgeon Bay provided a public wharf about 5 miles northwesterly from city of Sturgeon Bay. Two major shipyards are located in Sturgeon Bay where repair facilities are available including dry docks, marine railways and hoists. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $57,508. Minor structure repairs and safety maintenance were performed at a cost of $16,232. Supervision and administration cost $5,400. Navigation structures are in fair condition, the South Revetment, Section N, is in poor condition and is programmed for major repair. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $12,610,596, of which $1,059,722 was for new work, $10,354,856 for maintenance, $311,119 for diked disposal and $884,899 for rehabilitation. In addition, $235,940 was expended between April 25, 1893, and June 30, 1917, on operating and care of works of improvements under provision of permanent indefinite appropriations for such purposes. 66. TWO HARBORS, MN Location. Harbor is on north shore of Lake Superior, 27 miles northeasterly from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14966.) Existing Project. Narrowing natural entrance by construction of two breakwaters, 1,628 and 900 feet long, from eastern and western points of bay, respectively; and dredging a maneuvering area on north side of harbor to 28 and 30 feet deep. A walkway on east breakwater is provided for public recreational use. For details see page 1026 of Annual Report for 1965. Dredging to deepen areas along easterly and northerly edges of channel was completed in 1980. This portion of project was reclassified from the "inactive" to "active" category in 1973. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. A section 221 Local Cooperation Agreement was entered into with the city of Two Harbors on Aug. 14, 1978. Terminal Facilities. No publicly owned wharves. Three ore docks, tug wharf, an unused coal dock, and merchandise wharf are privately owned. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $1,755. The existing project is complete. Navigation structures are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $9,417,600, of which $4,170,710 was for new work and $5,246,890 for maintenance. 67. TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 82 miles north of Milwaukee and about 101 miles from Green Bay, WI, via Sturgeon Bay Canal. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14903.) Previous Project. See page 1377, Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-28. For detailed description see page 1226 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed project cost $147,463, exclusive of the amount expended on previous projects. The 1935 River and Harbor Act portion of project is essentially complete, except for dredging a 10-foot width along each side of the entrance channel between the piers. The uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1935 R & H Act was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. A coal wharf and several fishing wharves. City provided a wharf for receipt of petroleum products and public use. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, and environmental studies were performed by Government forces and 21-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 contract at a cost of $54,271. Safety repairs performed by hired labor cost $313. An adjustment of $100 was made in contract cost for maintenance dredging completed last FY. Supervision and administration cost $9,262. Existing project is complete except for portion deauthorized in December 1989. Present width of channel is considered adequate for present and reasonably prospective commerce. North Pier was completed in 1908. North Revetment, completed in 1917, was rebuilt in May to August 1962. Dredging entrance channel and inner basin to existing project depth was commenced in March and substantially completed in May 1937. Navigation structures are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $9,409,156, of which $360,320 was for new work, $7,803,307 for maintenance, $1,187,472 for diked disposal and $58,057 for minor rehabilitation. 68. WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI Location. On the east shore of Lake Michigan 120 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 45 miles southerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14935.) Existing Project. Parallel piers, revetments, and a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, 1,950 feet long, extending from Lake Michigan to White Lake. For additional details see page 1465 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. A privately owned chemical shipping dock on the north side of the lake about 3 miles from the inner end of revetted entrance channel. Across the lake, at village of Whitehall, there are several installations serving light draft vessels. These terminals satisfy present recreational and commercial traffic requirements. Operations During Fiscal Year. Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were perform by Government forces at a cost of $14,095. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $1,073. The contract awarded last FY for repair of the North & South Piers, Sections A-D (Phase I), was completed at a cost of $2,501,998. Engineering and design during construction for this work cost $11,584. Engineering and design was completed for repair of the North & South Pier and Revetment, Sections C-H & J (Phase II), at a cost of $25,070. A contract for this work was awarded and modified this FY in the amount of $3,101,407. The contract was 79% complete at the end of the FY at a cost of $2,470,998. Engineering and design during construction cost $11,994. Real estate and supervision and administration cost $240,571. Existing project was completed in 1908. Stone was placed on the north and south revetments in FY 1972. Navigation structures are in excellent condition. Project now being maintained to 14-foot depth authorized, which is adequate for current usage. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $11,772,229, of which $457,562 was for new work and $11,314,667 for maintenance. 69. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS See Table 21-J. 70. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 21-C. 71. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to section 107. Public Law 86-645 (pre-authorization.) Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Duluth (McQuade Road) Harbor, MN - The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 authorized the 21-40 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT Corps of Engineers to undertake investigations to determine the feasibility of a navigation project at Duluth, MN. Funds were provided by Congressional Add in FY98 to conduct a feasibility study for a harbor of refuge at Duluth (McQuade Road) Harbor. By letter dated January 8, 1998, the State of Minnesota made a formal request under Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Work on the feasibility study was initiated in FY98, including review of design and coordination work already completed by the State of Minnesota. Funds in the amount of $22,633 were expended in FY98. Huron River, Wayne and Monroe Counties, MI - By letter dated 12 December 1996, the Charter Township of Brownstown Township made a formal request under Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Funds were provided by Congressional Add in FY97 to complete an initial assessment to determine Federal interest. Results indicated no Federal interest and the study was terminated 7 November 1997. Funds in the amount of $4,564 were expended in FY98 for closeout of project activities. Taconite Harbor, MN - The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 authorized the Corps of Engineers to undertake investigations to determine the feasibility of a navigation project at Taconite Harbor, MN. Funds were provided by Congressional Add in FY98 to construct the harbor of refuge at Taconite Harbors. By letter dated January 8, 1998, the State of Minnesota made a formal request under Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Work on the project design was initiated in FY98, including review of design work performed by the State of Minnesota, which included the detailed design, preliminary plans and specifications and the draft Environmental Assessment. Funds in the amount of $21,555 were expended in FY98. Two Harbors, MN - The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 authorized the Corps of Engineers to undertake investigations to determine the feasibility of a navigation project at Two Harbors, MN. Funds were provided by Congressional Add in FY98 to construct the harbor of refuge at Two Harbors. By letter dated January 8, 1998, the State of Minnesota made a formal request under Section 107 of the River Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Work on the project design was initiated in FY98, including review of design work already completed by the State of Minnesota, as well as conducting surveys and geotechnical investigations. Funds in the amount of $26,366 were expended in FY98. BEACH EROSION CONTROL 72. AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS River and Harbor Act of 1962, as amended, Beach Erosion Control. None. 73. EMERGENCY SHORE PROTECTION Authority for emergency streambank and shoreline protection of public works and non-profit services (Section 14 Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended). Berrien County, Lake Charter Township, MI - By letter dated March 4, 1997, Lake Charter Township requested the Corps of Engineers to plan and design for approximately 240 feet of a shoreline erosion problem threatening a water pumping station located in Charter Township of Lake Charter, Berrien County, MI. Planning and design analysis activities were initiated in FY97 and plans and specifications were completed this FY. The project was approved for construction on June 26, 1998, and Federal construction funds were committed on July 14, 1998. Funds in the amount of $25,049 were expended in FY98. City of Escanaba, Delta County, MI - By letter dated November 3, 1997, the City of Escanaba requested the Corps of Engineers to plan and design for approximately 1,400 feet of a shoreline erosion problem threatening the 21-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 City of Escanaba's water treatment plant, in Delta County, MI. Funds in the amount of $18,572 were expended in FY98 for planning and design analysis activities. Oconto River, McDonald Street, Oconto, WI - By letter dated November 20, 1997, the city of Oconto requested the Corps of Engineers to plan and design for approximately 640 feet of a streambank erosion problem threatening McDonald Street in the city of Oconto, WI. Planning and design analysis activities were initiated in FY97 and plans and specifications were completed this FY. The project was approved for construction on March 5, 1998. Funds in the amount of $15,429 were expended in FY98. River Raisin, Monroe County, Ellis Library, MI - Funds in the amount of $27,638 were expended in FY98 for completion of constructing approximately 400 feet of streambank erosion along the River Raisin, adjacent to Monroe County's library system (Ellis). The completed facilities were turned over to the project sponsor on October 7, 1998. St. Joseph River, South Bend, Indiana - The project involves bank stabilization along the north and south banks of the St. Joseph River adjacent to the Indiana University South Bend campus, development of athletic facilities on the south side of the river, development of a multi-use trail on the north side of the river and construction of a pedestrian bridge to link the main campus with the south side expansion. The work was 'authorized under Section 14 by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996, and a Congressional Add to the 1998 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act provided $1,000,000 toward the project. No letter of support was provided by a local sponsor for the project, so no funds were expended in FY98. 74. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion activities pursuant to Section 103 of the 1962 River and Harbor Act. None. 75. MITIGATION OF SHORE DAMAGES Mitigation of Shore Damages pursuant to Section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968. Minnesota Point, Duluth Ship Canal, MN - Accelerated shoreline erosion along Minnesota Point is occurring, as a result of the interruption of along shore littoral transport processes by the Federally maintained navigation structures at Duluth Entry and Superior Entry. A study was initiated in FY97 in response to a request from the City of Duluth. The study addresses structural and non-structural measures to reduce erosion-type damage by shoreline stabilization. In FY98, a feasibility report was initiated to investigate potential alternatives to resolve the shoreline erosion problem. The feasibility report is expected to be completed by September 1999. Funds in the amount of $23,511 were expended in FY98. 76. PROJECT MODIFICATION FOR IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF THE ENVIRONMENT Ecosystem Restoration - Section 204 beneficial use of dredged material in connection with dredging. Projects in connection with dredging use of dredged material activities pursuant to Section 204 of Water Resources Development Act of 1992, as amended. Cat Island Chain, Brown County, WI - Funds in the amount of $65,776 were expended in FY98 to continue feasibility phase activities for designing restoration techniques to restore the Cat Island entrance to Green Bay Harbor, with its easterly boundary about 150 feet west of the deep-draft navigation channel extending into Green Bay. These techniques are being closely coordinated with State and local entities. Historically, the Cat Island Chain had an average width of about 500 feet and extended northwest for approximately 1-1/2 miles. It has dissipated over the years, such that, it only has an area with a diameter of 400 feet above normal water levels. A feasibility report is expected to be completed by September 30, 1999. 21-42 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT Project modification activities pursuant to Section 1135(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended. Paw Paw River, MI - Funds in the amount of $30,687 were expended in FY98 to complete a feasibility study of Paw Paw River, Michigan. The feasibility study addressed potential solutions to control sea lamprey in the Paw Paw River by use of either fixed-crest or variable crested dam alternatives. A feasibility report is expected to be completed by May 31, 1999. Princeton Dam, Green Lake County, WI - The Princeton Dam was constructed by the Corps of Engineers in 1897 to aid in providing commercial navigation between the Wisconsin River and Green Bay. A request for the Section 1135 study was made on November 14, 1996. A feasibility study was initiated to address modifying the Princeton Dam facility to allow flexibility in controlling water levels that would provide a means of enhancing fishery and aquatic habitat upstream of the Fox River system, in Lake Puckaway. Funds in the amount of $66,978 were expended in FY98. A feasibility report is expected to be completed by September 30, 1999. Sea Lamprey Trap at Unit 10, Sault Ste. Marie, MI - Construction of 6 permanent sea lamprey traps at the hydroelectric plant, Unit 10 Complex, Sault Ste. Marie, MI was completed September 12, 1997. An adjustment of -$8,052 was made in financial closeout costs of the project. FLOOD CONTROL 77. CLINTON RIVER SPILLWAY, MI Location. Clinton River Basin including its tributaries drains an area of 760 square miles in southeastern Michigan and empties into Lake St. Clair. Existing Project. The project consists of a two-mile long spillway channel connecting the Clinton River with Lake St. Clair and a weir at the upstream end of the project, about 9 miles upstream of the river's mouth, in Mount Clemens, MI. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Clinton River Spillway Inter- County Drainage Board operates and maintains the project. Operations During Fiscal Year. The Corps completed construction of an inflatable dam in FY97 to correct a Congressionally determined design deficiency at the weir. The purpose of this project modification is to improve the overall environment and associated beneficial uses of the lower Clinton River. Construction fund expenditures during FY 98 totaled $13,816 to install warning signs and enforce warranty provisions of the construction contract. Total cost to end of FY was $3,275,415. 78. FORT WAYNE METRO AREA, IN Location. Fort Wayne, which is located in northeastern Indiana in Allen County, is in the Maumee River drainage basin. In all, the Maumee basin covers an area of 6,586 square miles. Of this area, 4,856 square miles are in northwest Ohio, 1,260 are in northeast Indiana and 470 are in southeast Michigan. This basin is one of the largest and most important tributaries in the Great Lakes- St. Lawrence River system. There are four main tributary streams to the Maumee River: the Auglaize, Tiffin, St. Joseph and St. Marys Rivers. The St. Joseph and Tiffin Rivers originate in the hills of southern Michigan and flow southerly to the Maumee. The St. Marys and Auglaize originate in Ohio and flow northward. In the City of Fort Wayne, the St. Joseph and St. Marys Rivers join to form the headwaters of the Maumee River. From this point, the Maumee flows northeasterly and empties into Lake Erie at Toledo, Ohio. The central business district is located on the south side of the Maumee and the St. Marys Rivers. The St. Joseph River bisects primarily residential areas on the north side of the central business district. While some portions of the central business district are prone to flooding in the immediate vicinity of the St. Marys River, the majority of the business district is sufficiently elevated to avoid flood damages. The residential areas, however, are generally low lying and are prone to frequent flooding. Existing Project. The Fort Wayne and Vicinity, Indiana, Flood Control Study was authorized by 21-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 resolution of the Committee on Public Works, House of Representatives on October 12, 1972. The authorization requested that the Corps determine the advisability of providing improvements for flood control and allied purposes at and in the vicinity of Fort Wayne, Indiana. The study authorization resulted in completion of a Final Feasibility Report entitled "Fort Wayne and Vicinity, Indiana Flood Control Study," dated September 1987, and revised in April 1988, which identified and evaluated a number of different alternatives to flood control in the Fort Wayne area. The Final Feasibility Report also contained the "Final Environmental Impact Statement" for this project. Preparation of the General Design Memorandum began in August 1989 and was approved in December 1993. Construction was authorized in Section 101 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (Title 1 Public Law 101-640). This project was a Congressionally added new construction start in FY 1994. The Project Cooperative Agreement (PCA) was executed in August 1994 and construction was initiated in September 1995. The project will provide a 100- year level of flood protection to a large part of the central area of the City of Fort Wayne, Indiana which has experienced numerous flooding events in the past. The project is located along the north side of the St. Marys River, the east and west banks of the St. Joseph River, and the north bank of the Maumee River. Junk Ditch and Spy Run Creek which are tributary to the St. Marys River will also have protection installed or improved along their north and east banks respectively. The project area has been broken into four (4) segments which provide flood protection to various areas within the project limits. The West Segment is located along the St. Marys River and the Junk Ditch Tributary. The Central Segment is located along the Spy Run Tributary to the St. Marys River, a short section of the St. Marys River itself (at the confluence with the St. Joseph River), and along the west bank of the St. Joseph River. The East-North Segment is located along the east bank of the St. Joseph River and the East-South Segment is located along the north bank of the Maumee River. The total project length is approximately 54,000 feet. The project consists of several types of flood protection improvements. The most common type of flood protection improvements proposed are earth levees. The levees proposed are to have turf or rock protected slopes depending on the available space for their construction. Levees account for approximately 63 percent of the total project length. Concrete floodwalls are proposed in those areas where insufficient space exists to construct levees due to site constraints. Concrete flood walls account for 20 percent of the project length. An additional eight percent of the project length consists of a combination of a '/2 Reduced levee and concrete L-Wall. The remaining length is composed of various types of road closures (stoplogs, clay dikes and high curbs), and 3,000 feet in several areas which do not require improvements due to adequate existing surface grades. The fully funded total project cost estimate is $49,737,000. The Federal cost is $37,060,000 and the non-Federal cost is $12,677,000. Local Cooperation. The non-Federal sponsors for the project are the City of Fort Wayne and Allen County. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed with the Mayor of Fort Wayne and the Allen County Board of Commissioners on 22 August 1994. Under the terms of the PCA, the non-federal sponsors shall contribute a minimum of 25 percent, but not to exceed 50 percent, of the total project costs attributed to flood control purposes. This shall consist of all required lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations for the project; and a cash contribution equal to a minimum of five percent of the total project flood control cost. The Assistant Secretary of the Army (CW) has approved a credit in the amount of $1,123,500 under Section 104 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. This will be applied to the non-Federal share of the project flood control cost. In addition to the above, the nonfederal sponsor shall provide 50 percent of the total project recreation costs, 100 percent of all betterment costs, and shall operate and maintain all works after completion. Cash contributions totaling $5,000,000 have been provided through the end of FY 98. Real estate requirements for the East-South Segment were completed on July 27, 1995, East-North Segment on July 19, 1996 and the Central Segment on November 11, 1997. Operations During Fiscal Year. Expenditures of $13,157,896 were made to continue construction for the East-South Segment; complete the Design Memorandum and plans and specifications; award a construction contract for the East-North Segment and for the Central Segment and continue preparation of plans and specifications for the West Segment. Of the funds 21-44 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT expended, $2,502,554 was contributed by the City of Fort Wayne and Allen County. Total cost to end of FY was $30,907,802. 79. KAWKAWLIN RIVER, MI Location. River drains an irregularly shaped area of about 220 square miles in Bay, Gladwin, Midland, and Saginaw Counties in east-central Michigan and discharges into Saginaw Bay 2 miles northwest of Saginaw River. (See Geological Survey Bay City quadrangle and NOAA Nautical Charts 14867 and 14863.) Existing Project. Provides for deepening about 1.8 miles of river channel between the river mouth and Euclid Street Bridge; altering Detroit and Mackinac Railway Bridge by addition of two 45.9 foot spans; protecting by riprapping the channel bottom through Euclid Street Bridge, existing piers at Henry Street Bridge and Detroit and Mackinac Railway Bridge; and a number of utility relocations. The Water Resources Development Act (W.R.D.A.) of 1986, dated Nov. 17, 1986, Section 837, modified the flood control project on the Kawkawlin River, MI, that was authorized by Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, to provide that the Federal share of the cost of operation and maintenance of the project shall be 50 percent. (See Table 21-b) for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY, removing approximately 27,398 of shoal material at a cost of $176,300. Engineering, design, surveys and supervision and administration cost $11,052. Of the funds expended, $107,151 were contributed by the Bay County Board of Commissioners. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $1,915,243 of which $1,204,559 was for new work (includes $204,559 contributed funds) and $710,684 for maintenance (includes $221,114 contributed funds). 80. SAGINAW RIVER, MI Location. Saginaw River Basin including its tributaries, Tittabawassee, Shiawassee, Flint and Cass Rivers, drains an area of 6,260 square miles in the east central part of Michigan and empties into Saginaw Bay, an arm of Lake Huron. Bay City, near mouth of river, and Saginaw, 22 miles upstream from mouth, are on Federally improved deep-draft Saginaw River navigation channel (See Saginaw and Flint Geological quadrangles and NOAA Nautical Chart 14867). Existing Project. Provides for improvements in Saginaw River Basin for flood control and other purposes: (a) at Sanilac Flats, MI, Middle Branch and South Branch, Cass River, to provide for major drainage improvements by channel improvements on Middle and South Branches, including a short reach of East Branch. This feature of the project for flood control, Saginaw River, MI, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986; PL 99-662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X; (b) at Vassar on Cass River, to provide for flood protection of areas on north and south sides of river by channel improvement, levee construction floodwalls, modifications of Moore Drain, and related work at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct. 1984) of $8,620,000 and non- Federal cost of $579,000 for construction; (c) at Frankenmuth on Cass River, to provide for flood protection of areas on north side of river by channel improvement, levee construction, and related work, at an estimated U.S. cost (July 1974) of $410,900 for construction; (d) at Flint on Flint River, to provide for flood protection of areas on both sides of main stem of Flint River and its tributaries, Swartz and Thread Creeks by channel improvement, bridge alterations, floodwall and levee construction, and related work, at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct. 1984) of $18,251,600 and non-Federal cost of $2,580,000 for construction; provided local interests contribute in cash 1 percent of first cost of project, exclusive of cost of rights-of-ways; (e) at Corunna on Shiawassee River, to provide for flood protection by channel improvement, levee construction, and related work. This feature of the project for flood control, Saginaw River, MI, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986; PL 99-662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title 21-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 X; (f) at Owosso on Shiawassee River, to provide for flood protection by channel improvement. This feature of the project for flood control, Saginaw River, MI, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986, PL 99-662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X; (g) at Midland on Tittabawassee River, to provide for flood protection through non-structural (permanent evacuation) measures at an estimated U.S. cost (Apr. 1982) of $5,125,000 and non-Federal cost of $1,611,500 for implementation; however, project was reclassified to the "inactive" category on Dec.15, 1982; (h) at Shiawassee Flats along lower reaches of the four principal tributaries of Saginaw River, to provide for flood protection, including fish and wildlife areas; by channel improvement, levees, lateral reservoirs with control structures and related work at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct. 1984) of $23,417,500 Federal and non- Federal cost of $2,705,000 which includes a cash contribution of $1,237,000; provided local interests contribute in cash 5 percent of cost of rights-of-way for flood control and other work required as local cooperation, and furnish one-half of land required for fish and wildlife areas; provided that the Federal allocation for conservation does not exceed amount obtained by taking 28 percent of project cost for Shiawassee Flats unit and subtracting therefrom onehalf cost of lands for conservation; and provided further that before starting work for flood control to Shiawassee Flats, Chief of Engineers and Director, Fish and Wildlife Service, prepare a plan mutually acceptable to Secretary of the Army and Secretary of the Interior for operation of fish and wildlife areas to required degree of controlled storage of flood waters while preserving the maximum fish and wildlife benefits. Total estimated cost for new work, for active portion (1984) is $50,700,000 Federal and $1,421,000 to be contributed by local interests. Total estimated cost (1984) to local interests is $5,870,000. Local Cooperation. Responsible local interests must make cash contributions as called for above; furnish lands, and rights-of-way, including removal of buildings, for construction; hold the United States free from damage; maintain and operate all works after completion; establish and enforce regulations designed to prevent encroachments in improved channels; and bear expense of constructing highway relocations and highway bridges, alter bridge approaches and existing highway bridge approaches and existing highway bridges (except underpinning and bridge raising), and alter utilities. Required assurances for Flint River at Flint were furnished by city of Flint and accepted by the United States on Nov. 23, 1962. Estimated required cash contribution for Flint ($56,000) was furnished Feb. 20, 1963. An additional $117,000 was furnished by the City to cover increased construction costs. Required assurances for Cass River at Frankenmuth were accepted on Sep. 8, 1964. All necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way have been provided. The Midland City Council adopted a resolution on Jun. 7, 1982, declaring its intent not to sponsor the Flood Control project on the Tittabawassee River at Midland. The Vassar City Council, in a letter dated Jan. 26, 1982, indicated a willingness and capability to provide the assurances of local cooperation for the Vassar Flood Control Project. Saginaw County, in a resolution dated Aug. 11, 1982, indicated a willingness and capability to provide the assurances of local cooperation for the Shiawassee Flats Flood Control Project. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Funds in the amount of $75,175 were expended in FY98 to initiate preparation of the design analysis, and plans and specifications for the replacement of the inflatable dam. The total estimated cost for the project is $875,000 for design, contract award and construction. A Letter Report and draft PCA Supplement were submitted to Headquarters for approval. After the Letter Report and PCA Supplement are approved by Headquarters and the Supplement is executed, a construction contract will be awarded. Construction is expected to be complete in FY 2000. The operation and maintenance responsibility will then be transferred to the City of Flint. The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-303), Section 329 "Saginaw River, Michigan" modified Section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1958 (PL 85-500) to include as part of the Project the design and construction of an inflatable dam. The Energy and Water Development Act of 1998 (Public Law 105-62) provided $875,000 under the Operation & Maintenance, General appropriation for the preservation, operation, maintenance and care of the Project, to replace the inflatable dam. 21-46 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT Total cost of the existing project to the end of FY was $30,491,481, of which $24,928,359 was for new work (includes $173,000 contributed funds) and $5,563,122 for maintenance. 81. SEBEWAING RIVER, MI Location. Sebewaing River drains an area of 105 square miles in Huron and Tuscola Counties on the westerly side of Thumb area of Lower Peninsula of Michigan and discharges into Saginaw Bay, an arm of Lake Huron, 20 miles northeast from mouth of Saginaw River. Village of Sebewaing is near mouth of River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing Project. Enlarging present channel of Sebewaing River through village of Sebewaing, MI, to a capacity of 7,500 cubic feet per second from junction of Columbia and State drains to a point 4,500 feet lakeward from railroad bridge near mouth; altering railroad bridge and three highway bridges to permit free passage of ice; and removal of present dike on south side of channel lakeward from railroad bridge. Project is designed to provide protection for village of Sebewaing from floods with a frequency of once in 15 years and with a magnitude greater than the maximum flood of record. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Complied with except for furnishing easements and rights-of-way for removal of remaining portion of dike on south side of channel lakeward from railroad bridge. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: No funds were expended in FY98 for maintenance activities. Total costs to the end of FY were $812,261. 82. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS NAME OF PROJECT Red Run, Clinton River, MI Paw Paw Lake & River, MI DATE OF INSPECTION May 1998 Sep 1998 Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $200,935. Total cost to the end of FY was $2,969,538. 83. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 21-E. 84. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Flood Control Activities, Flood Fighting (Public Law 84-99 and PL 93-288 and Antecedent Legislation). Project and Location Disaster Preparedness Emergency Operations Rehabilitation Advance Measures FY Costs for Sep. 30. 1998 $ 272,196 10,243 58,327 $1,305,726 Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. None. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Snagging and clearing activities pursuant to Section 208 of the Flood Control Act of 1954, as amended. Galien River, Berrien County, MI - Funds in the amount of $35,154 were expended in FY98 to continue investigating the feasibility of undertaking a Section 208 study in Galien River, Berrien County, MI. The initial evaluation was to determine the magnitude of log and debris jams in the river and the extent of flood damages caused by these problems. It was determined during the investigation that the project was not economically feasible, and the study was subsequently terminated. Aquatic plant control activities pursuant to Section 302 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (PL 89-298). None. 21-47 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 85. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS AND INTERNATIONAL WATER STUDIES Field Operations. As a continuing and ongoing mission, the Detroit District conducts hydraulic flow measurement surveys throughout the Great Lakes Connecting Channels and St. Lawrence River system. These capabilities are unique within the Corps Districts (and other U.S. federal agencies) on the Great Lakes. During FY98, the Detroit District conducted current velocity and discharge measurements on the St. Marys, St. Clair, Detroit and Niagara Rivers. During FY98 the District continued gathering hydraulic data using the ADCP (Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler) instrumentation at several sections on the upper and lower Detroit River and the Niagara River. These hydraulic data sets are currently being used to develop one- and two-dimensional flow models of the river system, and to help refine the flow retardation estimates for weed conditions through the growing season. As an ongoing mission, during the winter months the District monitors the extent of ice in the St. Marys, St. Clair, and Detroit Rivers. Water levels are monitored continuously at key gages in these rivers to detect possible ice jams and potential flooding. This information can be used to provide advance warning to area residents and to trigger emergency actions by the Corps and other governmental agencies, including the National Weather Service and the Coast Guard. Currently, data are obtained through phone line interrogation of these gages or from a satellite downlink station using portable lap-top personal computers. These systems provide water level information to the District office within minutes of data collection. International Activities. The Detroit District has successfully supported the International Joint Commission (IJC) for many years. This has included numerous engineering and scientific assignments supporting the Commission's boards of control, working committees, and study boards. The following activities were conducted by the Detroit District, specifically for the IJC Boards and Committees: a. Members of the Detroit District staff attended the semi-annual meetings of the three Great Lakes Boards of Control. They also attended the spring appearances of the Boards before the IJC, in Washington, D.C. in April 1998, and the fall appearances, in Ottawa, Ontario in October 1998. b. International Lake Superior Board of Control. The Detroit District Engineer is the United States Regulation Representative of this Board. In support of the U.S. section of the Board, the District provided monthly Lake Superior outflow recommendations based upon a review of the hydrologic factors which influence the future regulation of Lake Superior. These recommendations were based upon the use of probability forecasts of water supplies routed through the lakes using the approved operating rule, Plan 1977-A. Plan 1977-A has been in operational use since June 1990. Further proposed modifications of the regulation plan were explored by the Detroit District under the IJC Levels Reference Study. In response to recommendations from this study, the IJC requested that the Superior Board formally review the Orders of Approval and the regulation plan. A review of areas to be addressed has been initiated. In FY98, the District completed a program to perform repairs on the U.S. portion of the Compensating Works in the St. Marys River. The repairs include repainting of the gates, concrete repairs to the piers, and replacement of gate sills and seals. The District's continuing program to evaluate the hydraulic rating of the Compensating Works in the St. Marys River will be reinitiated in FY99. During FY98 flow measurements were conducted in the power canals at Sault Ste. Marie, MI and Ontario as part of an ongoing program to collect and verify data. c. International Niagara Board of Control and International Niagara Working Committee. The District provides direct technical support and consulting engineering services to this Board and Committee. The Chief of the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch is a member of the Committee. Under the auspices of the Committee, the Detroit District, with Canada, computes, coordinates, and publishes the monthly flows in the Niagara River. During FY98, the Detroit District and the Water Survey of Canada conducted a series of discharge measurements 21-48 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT in the upper Niagara River at the International Railway Bridge Section for verification of Lake Erie outflow equations. Information to date indicates that the existing equations are adequate during average flow ranges, but still require verification at the very high and very low extremes. Future measurements are scheduled for this section in FY98, in accordance with the Board's recommendation to continue making them every three years. Based upon the results of the FY98 measurements, the equations may be reevaluated. Due to the dynamic nature of the Niagara River at the Falls, the District is involved with periodic verification of the rating curves for the Ashland Avenue and American Falls gages. The Ashland Avenue relationship measures the total flow over the American and Canadian Falls to ensure that the Board operates within the terms of the Niagara Treaty. Discharge measurements for the Ashland Avenue rating curve are scheduled every three years. Measurements were made in FY98, and the next series is scheduled for FY01. Based upon the analysis of these data, the 1981 relationship still adequately represents actual flow data. d. Lake Michigan Potential Damages Study. In response to one of the recommendations from the IJC's 1993 Levels Reference Study, in FY98 the Detroit District continued a potential damage study of the Lake Michigan shoreline. The ultimate goal of this study is to develop an economic assessment method for determining the local risks for various alternate hydrologic scenarios. This study will serve as a framework for similar efforts to be conducted basinwide. Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data. In FY98, the Chief of the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch was the U.S. Secretary to this Committee. Other Branch personnel also held membership on the three subcommittees: The Vertical Control-Water Levels, Hydraulics, and Hydrology. The District continued its support of Committee operations pertaining to the coordination of basic hydraulic and hydrologic data with Canada. District efforts have also continued to closely coordinate the formats of the U.S. and Canadian water level bulletins in order to avoid confusion and to better inform the public. In addition, the District continued working with NOAA's Great Lakes Environmental Research Lab (GLERL) with regard to improving the computational procedures currently employed in the Great Lakes 6- month water level forecast. In FY94, District personnel finalized a Coordinating Committee report which documents all U.S. and Canadian discharge measurements made on the Great Lakes Connecting Channels and St. Lawrence River during the period 1860 to 1993. Appendix B, "Chronologic Summaries of Construction and Dredging," to the report was completed in FY98. LRD Master Plan for the Water Control Data System. In FY98, the Water Control Data System consisted of a network of Unix workstations and Windows-based PC's. Presently, a PC collects water level data from the District's own Data Collection Platforms (DCP's) and from NOS/NOAA and Canadian MEDS computer systems. In FY98, the Detroit District continued to provide an extensive variety of water control products, based on the water level gage network, on its Internet home page. Weather information and meteorological data are received and processed within the District using a 586 PC and Windows software. The District is also in the process of building a database of the NEXRAD data it collects from the Automated Family of Services (AFOS) line. The District plans to incorporate this data in its water level forecasting missions as well as the development or improvement of other District publications. Once guidance is developed by HEC, Oracle database linkages will be developed during FY98 to provide relational database management capabilities. The District has 31 active DCPs and plans to upgrade and possibly expand the network, based upon an on-going reviews of its water level gaging program. Great Lakes Information Management. The District has continued the development of a Geographic Information System (GIS) for the U.S. portion of the Great Lakes. The GIS contains multiple information layers on the physiographic, economic, sociologic, environmental, and hydrologic characteristics of the Great Lakes region. The GIS is designed to create a "corporate data base" to support various District 21-49 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 operations and studies. The District has completed a comprehensive GIS containing current U.S. shoreline land uses, under the IJC Levels Reference Study. Historical recession rate data, shore-type classification, shore protection and sub-aqueous material profiles support shoreline damage estimates and erosion modeling. In support of the USEPA/USACE Interagency Agreement for the Southeast Michigan Initiative (SEMI), the District has developed a desktop GIS to provide a multi-agency decision support system for environmental planning and restoration. To date the SEMI GIS covers eight major watersheds, and contains all contaminated sediment data sets collected by all U.S. and Canadian agencies for the last 20 years. Great Lakes Hydrology. Water supply forecasts are used routinely by the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch in forecasting water levels and regulating the outflows from Lakes Superior and Ontario. Studies to improve the existing Great Lakes water level forecasting system, including investigations into the factors affecting the Great Lakes water balance relationship (i.e., runoff, over-water precipitation, evaporation, ice retardation, etc.) and use of real-time hydrologic data were continued by the staff of the Branch. Great Lakes Water Levels. The Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch continued to make routine short-term (15 days to one month) and long-term (six months) Great Lakes still water level forecasts. These forecasts are distributed in the form of weekly, bimonthly and monthly news releases and bulletins. The Monthly Bulletin of Lake Levels for the Great Lakes, containing a six month projection of Great Lakes water levels, has a circulation of about 10,000 copies per month. Included with the monthly bulletin on a quarterly basis is an informational enclosure entitled "Great Lakes Update," which consists of various topics of interest pertaining to the Great Lakes, such as frequently asked questions, information on water regulation plans, and incidental information on Great Lakes hydraulics and hydrology. With water levels on the Great Lakes approaching continuing to be high during FY98, Branch personnel provided extensive technical information and expertise regarding recorded lake levels and still water lake level forecasts to many interested parties, such as members of Congress, State and local officials, news media, navigation and power interests, concerned property owners, and recreational boaters. Upon request, water level information was supplied to the public in the form of the District's web page, telephonic and written responses to inquiries, presentations to various interest groups, and interviews with the news media. Daily reports on present water levels, precipitation and significant events on the Great Lakes basin, are currently available on the District's Internet home page. Forecasted and historical water level data are'also available on this system. Interested agencies and individuals can retrieve this information at any time via an Internet service provider. The total costs for FY98 under the Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters was $2,552,260, and under the International Water Studies, $291,950. MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER 86. ST. MARYS RIVER, MI Location. A Great Lakes connecting channel about 63 miles long, flows southeasterly between State of Michigan and Providence of Ontario, Canada, from eastern end of Lake Superior into northern end of Lake Huron. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14882, 14883, and 14884.) At Sault Ste. Marie, MI, about 14 miles downstream from Lake Superior, there are four parallel locks and a hydroelectric powerplant. Previous Project. For details see page 1955, Annual Report for 1915; and page 1529, Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Channels permitting 25.5-foot draft navigation in St. Marys River and Lake Superior and Lake Huron approaches thereto; constructing and operating four locks and two canals; constructing an electric plant of 14,000 kilowatt capacity (45,000 kilowatt ultimate capacity) constructing anchorage areas in river above and below locks; and constructing various other works in conjunction with project. Subsequently, in 1932, the Unit 10 powerhouse was installed raising the 21-50 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT capacity to 18,400 kilowatts (45,000 ultimate capacity). Original State Locks were operated and maintained under permanent indefinite appropriation from Jun. 9, 1881, to Nov. 2, 1886, after which they were destroyed by excavation for the Poe Lock in 1896. Weitzel Lock, destroyed in 1942 by excavation for the MacArthur Lock, was operated and maintained under the same appropriation from Sep. 1, 1881, to Jun. 30, 1935. Poe Lock was operated and maintained under the same appropriation from Aug. 3, 1896, Davis Lock from Oct. 21, 1914, and Sabin Lock from Sep. 18, 1919, to end of FY 1935. The 1,200-foot by 110-foot new Poe Lock was authorized in 1962 and put into operation in 1968. Details of existing project are set forth in Table 21-F. Project depths are referred to low water datum corresponding to sloping surface of river as follows: Above locks: When water surface of Lake Superior is at elevation 601.1 feet and at upstream side of locks is 600.6 feet above mean water level at Rimouski, Quebec, IGLD 1985. Below locks: When water surface at downstream side of locks is at elevation 578.4 feet and Lake Huron is 577.5 feet above mean water level at Rimouski, Quebec, IGLD 1985. Estimated (1974) cost for new work is $163,087,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) The WRDA of 1986 authorized construction of a second lock 1,294 feet in length, 115 feet in width, and 32 feet in depth, adjacent to the existing lock. The replacement lock is to be located in the North Canal of the St. Marys Falls Canal at Sault Ste. Marie, MI, on the site of the existing Davis and Sabin Locks. Material removed during construction of the replacement lock will be placed on the Northwest Pier to serve as a windbreak for downbound vessels approaching the lock. Estimated cost (Oct. 90) is $174,200,000 Federal and $93,800,000 non-Federal. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662), are as follows: (a) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for implementation and later maintenance of the proposed project, and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and later disposal of dredged/demolition material and including necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the costs of such retaining works; (b) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the implementation and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (c) Accomplish without cost to the United States such alterations and relocations of pipelines, powerlines, cables, sewer, water supply, drainage, and other utilities, structures, and improvements made necessary by the project. (Any such costs of the items on Federal property at the locks, would be part of the total construction cost and not separable local sponsor cost.); (d) Contribute in cash 25 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, exclusive of aids to navigation, a contribution presently estimated at $67,000,000. The estimated cash contribution of $67,000,000 to be paid in lump sum prior to initiation of construction, or in annual installments during the construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed or scheduled expenditure of Federal funds as required by the Chief of Engineers, or under another arrangement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; (e) Repay, with interest, over a period of up to 30 years following project completion, 10 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, an amount presently estimated at $26,800,000. The Secretary of the Army may count against all or part of the 10 percent repayment, the amount of the local contribution for lands, easements, rights-of-way, dredged/demolition material disposal sites and relocations. In no case are these costs to count against the cash payment during construction, and in no case would the amount waived exceed 10 percent of project cost; and (f) Any construction needed to prevent/mitigate for erosion or shoaling attributed to the lock would be cost 21-51 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 shared in the same proportion as the project. Terminal Facilities. This improvement serves through commerce between Lake Superior and lower lakes and has not materially influenced terminal facilities at localities along its route. Three piers at Sault Ste. Marie receive coal and petroleum products. Limestone is shipped from a pier at Drummond Island. Vessel refueling stations are at Lime Island and village of DeTour; they receive coal and petroleum products. Present terminals satisfy current traffic requirements. Operations During Fiscal Year. Operations, maintenance, and care of locks: Two canals and three locks were operated (the fourth lock, Sabin, was in caretaker status) as required. Necessary repairs and improvements were made thereto and to appurtenant structures and equipment. Canals were open to navigation 297 days during the period 1 October 1997 through 30 September 1998. A total of 10,073 vessels, aggregating 88,914,144 short tons of freight and 169,364 passengers passed through the MacArthur and Poe Locks. (The Davis Lock was not used in FY98.) Total cost for operation, maintenance, and care of the locks during the FY was $7,998,364, which includes; $105,646 for MacArthur Lock stoplog welding repairs, of which $59,401 was performed by contract with $23,878 for supervision and administration of the contract; $136,786 to continue preparation of plans and specifications for major repairs to the MacArthur Lock; $106,100 for repairs to the Poe Lock monolith joint and stoplog recess. A contract was awarded for this work this FY in the amount of $3,616,600. Work will begin next FY; $59,612 for renovation of the Davis Lock pump well sluice gate; and $1,770 to initiate plans and specifications for repairs to the Davis and Sabin Locks valves and piping. Powerhouse and equipment: A total of 156,682,528 kilowatt-hours of power was generated this FY. Income from the sale of power, sent to the U.S. Treasury, amounted to $1,804,866. Total cost of operation and maintenance for two hydroelectric powerhouses during the FY was $2,132,115. Total cost also includes assistance from the Hydroelectric Design Center for continued benchmark testing of the generators and turbines, a powerhouse rehabilitation report, preparation of plans and specifications for 3A runner, unit #10 shaft runner, installation of automated governor, excitation & fire suppression system, and footbridge repairs all at a cost of $281,845; supervision and administration for FY93 generator rewind of Units 1 thru 3 contract cost $12,149; An adjustment of $8,931 was made in contract cost for FY94 rehabilitation of hydroelectric Unit 3A contract with $16,639 for supervision and administration of the contract; An adjustment of $1 was made in contract cost for repair of unit #10 shaft runner with $1,993 for supervision and administration of the contract; and rehabilitation of governor, excitation, and fire suppression system contracts cost $841,171 with $32,006 for supervision and administration of the contracts. Other operation and care items: Buildings and grounds were operated and maintained, condition surveys, operations studies, environmental activities, real estate, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $2,106,291, which includes a custodial, snow removal and grounds upkeep contract for $357,054 and a service contract for security measures for $415,863. Supervision and administration to close-out FY95 contract for elevator upgrade in the Administration building cost $1,842. Engineering and design for rehabilitation of the Administration and Davis buildings continued at a cost of $101,926. Plans and specifications for various other repair contracts to be awarded in the future cost $75,669. Winter and extended navigation season studies, ice measurements, and weather monitoring cost $102,359. Channels and canals: St. Marys River channels and canal approach depths were surveyed by sweeping. Removal of shoals in the St. Marys River channels and canal approaches was performed by hired labor using the U.S. Derrickbarge NICOLET and the U.S. Cranebarge HARVEY at a cost of $2,200,109. Work performed by hired labor on the Compensating Gates cost $13,534. Supervision and administration cost $28,601. Other miscellaneous items: The contract awarded last FY for switch gear assembly "B&F" replacement was actually completed this FY (not last FY as previously reported) in the amount of $548,099. Engineering and design during construction, and supervision and administration for this contract cost $80,014. Repair of armor old disposal sites was performed by hired labor at 21-52 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT a cost of $490,007. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for repair of Pier 17 compensating works at a cost of $291,230. Supervision and administration of the contract cost $33,865. Engineering and design for major repair of the Rock Cut, East Guide Wall, continued at a cost of $23,471. Review of plans and specifications, and supervision and administration in support of Edison Soo construction contract for repair of compensating works cost $13,534. Recreational facilities: Information center, visitors center, comfort stations, park fountain, and observation and overlook platforms were operated and maintained at a cost of $137,053 which includes a custodial contract for the Information Center at a cost of $30,502. Visitors entering the Soo Locks Visitors Center numbered 474,912. Visitors to the observation platforms overlooking the locks numbered 485,098. Total visitors to the Soo Locks park numbered 642,349. A grand total of 799,161 people (includes tour boat visitors of 156,812) visited the Soo Locks. Total project costs in FY 98 amounted to $16,703,685. Project in effect prior to modification of March 21, 1956, is complete and work authorized by 1956 modification to provide a safe draft of 25.5 feet for both upbound and downbound traffic is also complete. Public Works Acceleration Funds used for maintenance were $118,000. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $509,198,528, of which $160,657,071 was for new work and $348,528,357 for maintenance (includes $340,400 contributed funds). GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 87. SURVEYS FY98 funds in the amount of $227,028 were expended to continue the Section 216 restudy of Federal interest for Fox River, WI. Coordination Studies with other Agencies include: Special Investigations, $40,228 which includes engineering and technical assistance given to local citizens because of fluctuating lake levels of the Great Lakes; FERC, $2,562; and Interagency Water Resources Development, $10,271; North American Water Fowl Management Planning, $3,026; National Estuary Studies, $5,549; and Cooperation with other Water Resource agencies, $5,049. Great Lakes Remedial Action, $70,902; and Section 22, Planning Assistance to States and Tribes: Federal amount shown, studies cost shared equally with partner include: Oneida Tribe, GIS, WI - $0; Oneida Tribe, Watershed, WI - $36,173; Menominee Tribe, WI - $63,783; Douglas County GPS, WI - $78; Lake St. Clair Aquatic Vegetation Study, MI - $134; Big Muskego Lake, WI - $72,447; Lake Huron Shoreline, MI - $44; McLain State Park, MI - $30; Isabella Co. Structures, MI - $49,234; Dearborn Heights Structures, MI $$23,943; Elk Rapids Breakwater, MI - $7,819;and State Flood Plain Mapping, MI - $51,527. 88. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN GREAT LAKES CONNECTING CHANNELS AND HARBORS, REPLACEMENT LOCK Funds in the amount of $158,448 were expended in FY98 on preconstruction engineering and design work activities. The project, as authorized in the WRDA of 1986 and the WRDA of 1990, calls for constructing a second lock able to accommodate the largest vessels engaged in Great Lakes commerce. The authorized dimensions are 1,294 feet in length, 115 feet in width, and 32 feet in depth. The authorized cost (1985) is $227,428,000. The new lock would replace two existing locks that are only 80 feet in width and 23 feet in depth. The project had not been funded earlier due to lack of a local sponsor. The WRDA of 1996 eased the cost-sharing requirements for a non-Federal sponsor. Given the delay in initiating preconstruction engineering and design, the initial work effort is preparing a limited re-evaluation report to assure that the project remains economically justified. 21-53 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 89. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood Plain Management Services. FY98 costs in the amount of $264,021 were associated with the following tasks under the Flood Plain Management Services Program; Unit - $69,555, Technical Services - $42,170, National Flood Proofing Committee - $8,846, Quick Responses - $4,961, Guides, Pamphlets & Supt Studies - $19,915; Specials Studies for; Menominee Tribe, WI, Flood Plain Study - $529, Menominee Tribe, WI, Ice Boom Study - $426, Little Rice Lake Wisconsin Dam Break Analysis - $106, Germania Dam Wisconsin DamBreak Analysis - $19,831, HEC-RAS Workshop in Indiana - $19,495, HEC-HMS Workshop in Michigan - $19,498, HEC II Basic Workshop for Native Americans at Oneida Tribe, WI - $40; Hermantown Minnesota Flood Plain Study - $36, St. Louis Co. Flood Plain Study, MN - $24,565,HEC WEAP Workshop, MI - $8,951, and the completion of the Flood Plain Geographical Information System Data Base for Michigan - $25,097. Flood Insurance Studies. No Flood Insurance Studies were completed in FY98 for the Detroit Districts. One new Flood Insurance Study for Kent County, MI was initiated with no costs in FY98. FY98 ongoing coordination costs for other studies at Oakland, Macomb and Wayne Counties, Michigan were $0, $69,497 and $81,446 respectively. Costs in FY98 in support of the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Community Assistance Program for Handy Township, MI, amounted to $81. In FY98, Hydrologic Studies cost $2,692, and International Water Studies, $29,934. 21-54 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 1. Alpena Harbor, MI 2. Arcadia Harbor, MI 3. Ashland Harbor, WI 4. Ausable Harbor, MI Contributed Funds 5. Black River Harbor, MI (P.H.) New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 33,255 33,255 0 0 9,073 9,073 0 0 2,174 2,174 76,000 125,000 144,000 77,320 124,331 139,272 100,431 95,460 1,075 39,000 5,623 29,890 0 0 0 0 267 267 0 0 0 0 0 0 44,012 41,437 0 0 52,238 52,238 244,900 251,196 337,394' 337,394' 1,123,762 1,123,762 5,124,929 5,124,883 1,695,645 1,695,645 (8,213) 4,190,198 1,269 4,190,147 193,3762 193,3762 16,400 16,400 6,884 2,880,755 9,459 2,880,755 480,2443 480,2443 349,921 349,921 21-55 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 5. Black River Harbor, MI (P.H.) (Continued) 6. Black River Harbor, MI (U.P.) 7. Cedar River Harbor, MI 8. Charlevoix Harbor, MI 9. Cheboygan Harbor, MI Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major( or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 85,000 86,291 (4,000) 29,284 3,528 29,947 4,765 1,483,1424 5,012 1,483,1424 383,3505 383,3505 134,012 136,723 178,000 172,339 912 2,147 15,000 19,928 0 0 8,878 8,878 1,357 1,007,201 1,627 1,007,201 0 733 123,000 122,573 684,000 374,769 408,000 408,000 807,000 497,342 180,623 180,623 247,051 222,018 244,000 245,822 223,271 243,814 372,700 10,352,337 375,119 10,352,225 1,129,396 1,129,396 65,047 57,112 0 0 9,704 17,454 0 0 20,000 19,754 504,236 504,236 1,427 1,027,360 1,859 1,027,360 21-56 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 10. Clinton River, MI Contributed Funds 11. Cornucopia Harbor, WI 12. Detroit River, MI Contributed Funds 13. Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN & WI New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 0 0 0 0 40,000 42,443 1,696 124,000 3,647 108,163 260,0466 260,0466 289,7527 289,752' 10,089 7,440,345 26,384 7,440,345 0 0 58,000 50,368 10,586 112,006 17,571 102,828 3,999,000 4,976,000 3,907,000 4,022,825 4,980,579 3,869,796 (8,266) 1,559 462,653 462,653 1,180,215 1,180,215 76,877,357' 76,877,3578 2,527,500 163,933,9859 2,588,228 163,932,9139 361,235 361,235 83,400 85,425 34,000 218,357 0 0 (315) 0 2,794,500 3,298,000 2,901,586 3,264,326 0 0 0 0 3,499 000 3,523,702 0 16,894,65810 0 16,894,65810 331,685 331,685 4,157,000 74,537,691" 4,158,386 74,484,158" 21-57 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 13. Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN&WI (Continued) 14. Fox River, WI 15. Frankfort Harbor, MI Contributed Funds 16. Grand Haven Harbor, MI Section 111 Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 11,555,410 11,555,410 3,753,33412 3,753,33412 2,240,000 2,185,000 2,384,000 2,271,569 2,117,297 2,197,791 2,740,802 58,910,52713 2,968,374 58,809,26313 1,923,450 1,923,450 31,709 31,709 791,000 838,728 25,707 44,122 26,778 43,343 240,724 11,331,88414 241,542 11,331,27714 274,776 274,776 1,283,469'5 1,283,46915 175,000 175,000 835,000 1,244,000 1,305,000 892,197 1,262,814 1,310,152 1,230,200 32,387,51016 1,225,812 32,377,93116 21-58 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 16. Grand Haven Harbor, MI (Continued) Section ill 17. Grand Marais Harbor, MI 18. Green Bay Harbor, WI 19. Greilickville Harbor, MI 20. Hammond Bay Harbor, MI Maintenance Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 64,000 66,623 68,000 105,000 64,204 104,008 12,274 26,505 12,274 21,463 1,097,000 1,647,000 1,928,663 1,114,053 1,659,951 1,935,240 17,901 17,607 New Work Approp. Cost 0 0 15,480 19,146 0 0 0 0 5,261 5,261 0 0 21-59 O0 0 56,000 60,795 4,370 9,412 2,182,900 2,183,373 8,120 8,040 15,585 15,585 2,583,861 2,582,262 813,613 813,613 1,055,871 1,055,871 2,632,619 2,632,619 9,946,39517'18 9,946,39517'18 47,190,00119 47,185,506" 369,55720 369,55720 306,090 306,010 1,015,366 1,015,366 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 20. Hammond Bay Harbor, MI (Continued) Section 111 Section 111 21. Harbor Beach Harbor, MI 22. Harrisville Harbor, MI Contributed Funds Section 111 New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 77,000 77,000 12,507 18,657 0 0 0 0 37,073 35,679 00 0 0 0 0 00 29,225 33,029 6,027 41,000 6,167 35,282 00 0 0 6,645 97,090 9,681 83,776 2,895 56,001 2,856 35,749 (1,652) 1,013,888 4,212 1,013,888 0 0 50,000 50,000 1,200,598 1,200,598 519,800 15,596,94621 528,224 15,591,05721 194,504 194,504 1,849,938 1,849,938 287,454 287,454 502,000 502,000 (15,992) 1,322,525 4,515 1,322,447 21-60 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 22. Harrisville Harbor, MI (Continued) 23. Holland Harbor, MI Contributed Funds Section 111 Section 111 24. Inland Route, MI Contributed Funds Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 465,000 516,000 1,567,000 452,240 530,203 1,570,839 58,000 59,569 54,000 74,000 56,002 71,800 88,000 88,000 736,12222 736,12222 35,705 35,705 621,000 621,000 302,100 26,655,50323 302,941 26,652,76723 59,000 2,199,915 62,029 2,197,143 0 0 0 0 0 0 102,000 129,075 502,452 502,452 770,222 770,222 148,000 148,000 39,000 27,000 38,179 14,634 10,400 3,207,81624 23,918 3,207,73324 25. Kenosha Harbor, WI 0 988,96925,26 0 988,96925.26 New Work Approp. Cost 21-61 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 25. Kenosha Harbor, WI (Continued) 26. Kewaunee Harbor, WI 27. Keweenaw Waterway, MI 28. Knife River Harbor, MN 29. Lac La Belle Harbor, MI Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 143,587 48,000 193,000 142,035 47,903 186,927 54,922 11,253,32127 61,576 11,252,25427 0 0 0 0 1,270,275 1,270,275 758,33328 758,33328 206,000 242,000 200,000 201,626 240,319 205,791 0 0 644,000 651,567 00 3,147 3,147 00 219,800 10,456,43029 220,784 10,454,54429 617,300 617,300 5,974,141 5,974,141 485,000 282,000 481,965 285,777 00 944 944 00 0 0 1,035 1,035 477,014 28,624,72930 483,633 28,612,61830 141,000 97,518 628 628 0 0 533,945 510,463 310,883 310,883 269,27031 269,27031 21-62 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 29. Lac La Belle Harbor, MI (Continued) 30. Lake St. Clair, MI, Channels 31. Leland Harbor, MI Contributed Funds 32. Lexington Harbor, MI Contributed Funds Section 111 Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 42,955 43,973 6,307 15,000 6,307 14,680 193,000 110,000 102,000 177,119 127,387 77,272 233,974 289,000 146,126 236,051 288,797 119,883 20,535 21,425 742,871 742,871 7,675,35732 7,675,35732 25,200 13,891,87033 51,571 13,891,78733 231,800 257,184 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22,900 190,430 44,000 20,273 178,746 33,100 672,950 672,950 354,139 354,139 3,457,422 3,454,374 70,678 70,678 1,646,304 1,646,304 1,088,888 1,088,888 0 372,000 0 372,000 (23,121) 213 810,520 808,643 21-63 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 32. Lexington Harbor, MI (Continued) Section 111 33. Little Lake Harbor, MI Contributed Funds 34. Ludington Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 35. Manistee Harbor, MI Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 67,000 69,039 123,000 121,518 99,000 40,000 97,004 37,624 63,000 135,000 69,239 129,245 1,499,000 349,000 210,000 1,499,488 349,771 139,849 10,000 9,927 11,000 19,051 1,996,987 1,995,613 542,808 542,808 57,670 57,670 53,500 4,487,472 60,422 4,487,202 7,912,20234 7,912,20234 0 620,000 0 620,000 699,200 17,986,9473s 756,673 17,970,8663s 30,000 29,920 757,340 757,187 357,913 357,913 2,696,52236 2,696,52236 1,593,000 277,000 73,961 1,590,316 277,029 66,394 458,262 11,747,91437 471,806 11,747,90237 21-64 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 35. Manistee Harbor, MI (Continued) 36. Manistique Harbor, MI 37. Manitowoc Harbor, WI Contributed Funds Contributed Funds 38. Marquette Harbor, MI New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 186,000 123,739 0 1,299,35538 0 1,299,35538 51,600 2,494,583 113,446 2,494,168 316,333 316,333 0 0 0 0 0 0 800,000 149,000 129,000 793,371 120,781 161,987 3,700 25,888 0 400 7,399 0 2,048,914 39 2,048,914 39 1,911,130 1,911,130 208,100 11,841,52040 210,525 11,839,61440 9,206 0 64,699 47,860 0 1,282,89341' 0 1,282,89341 278,141 (4,232) 270,495 3,415 3,441 3,441 238,411 3,142,15942 238,410 3,141,88842 21-65 Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost 1,374,164 1,374,164 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 38. Marquette Harbor, MI (Continued) 39. Menominee Harbor & River, MI & WI 40. Milwaukee Harbor, WI Contributed Funds 41. Monroe Harbor, MI Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Contrib. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost 0 0 0 0 0 0 39,459 39,951 0 0 2,985,000 2,965,150 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28,042 153,000 26,451 147,871 465,757 465,757 533,47643 533,47643 36,762 36,762 38,000 3,553,879" 44,764 3,553,879" 1,351,852 1,351,852 0 8,231,02445 0 8,231,0244s 4,212,000 3,003,000 4,247,207 2,977,783 0 0 New Work Approp. Cost 0 0 1,319,500 51,774,73746 1,354,333 51,761,32446 322,471 322,471 12,715,560 12,715,560 687,340 687,340 21-66 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 41. Monroe Harbor, MI New Work (Continued) Contributed Funds Contributed Funds 42. Muskegon Harbor, MI Section 111 43. New Buffalo Harbor, MI Contributed Funds Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 0 0 68,000 149,000 672,000 88,211 155,351 673,383 300,000 300,000 195,200 58,991,75147 196,078 58,991,69647 249,84948 249,84948 2,912,11049 2,912,1104 9 105,000 105,000 540,000 660,000 93,000 518,168 681,616 88,875 324,000 168,000 332,267 168,780 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 303,200 10,177,64150 304,572 10,170,32250 160,000 3,266,700 157,407 3,262,532 0 0 0 0 0 0 130,000 331,000 38,000 95,412 359,887 36,084 13,824,300 13,824,300 1,285,716 1,285,716 1,186,467 1,186,467 8,655 5,234,05051 19,240 5,234,014s' 21-67 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 44. Oconto Harbor, WI 45. Ontonagon Harbor, MI 46. Pentwater Harbor. MI 47. Petoskey Harbor, MI 48. Point Lookout Harbor, MI New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 130,75452 130,75452 32,326 33,536 17,434 59,059 18,176 50,529 (1,168) 2,262,832 s3 7,878 2,262,832 s3 0 0 1,922,000 724,000 1,475,000 2,125,775 769,352 1,487,371 953,90354 953,90354 599,000 22,006,885 ss 609,765 22,005,383 ss 179,899 179,899 212,000 424,000 2,835,000 214,181 421,189 2,810,345 1,523,900 9,617,167 1,556,995 9,616,769 0 0 1,977 1,977 0 0 10,984 13,121 50,000 41,646 106,075 114,073 123,839 123,839 725,763 725,407 2,642,584 2,642,584 9,304 87,000 10,681 74,551 (1,224) 4,067,40856 11,871 4,067,40856 21-68 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 48. Point Lookout Harbor, MI (Continued) Contributed Funds 49. Port Austin Harbor, MI Contributed Funds 50. Port Sanilac Harbor, MI Contributed Funds Section 111 Contributed Funds Section 111 51. Port Washington Harbor, WI Maintenance Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 0 0 0 0 0 0 37,792 33,190 0 0 36,811 31,147 9,257 9,257 3,191,234 3,191,234 0 0 1,574 4,699 87,089 88,531 0 0 0 0 135,780 0 140,277 (5,459) 72,000 61,258 0 172,100 0 172,100 1,005 1,040 2,060,98257 2,060,982 s7 909,963 909,963 487,108 487,108 336,000 336,000 (4,688) 2,331,74158 1,857 2,331,66058 0 0 6,000 10,621 0 115,000 0 115,000 1,152,250 1,146,130 2,582,204x9 2,582,204"9 0 0 21-69 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 51. Port Washington Harbor, WI (Continued) Contributed Funds 52. Port Wing Harbor, WI 53. Portage Lake Harbor, MI 54. Presque Isle Harbor, MI Section 111 New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost 1,624,000 1,624,000 111,000 122,067 5,718 33,265 7,072 30,469 164,500 3,271,20760 165,735 3,269,62460 0 0 27,775 31,495 6,109 24,898 7,143 24,898 29,903 130,079 406,829 27,416 131,414 402,505 63,393 63,393 258,932 1,448,691 252,852 1,442,612 0 256,129 0 256,129 84,300 2,875,049 90,648 2,874,771 1,190,492 1,190,492 0 0 25,000 28,658 0 0 61,700 61,700 502 74,000 3,347 60,278 4,904 1,853,90361 19,534 1,853,90361 0 0 76,500 76,500 21-70 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 55. Rouge River, MI 56. Saginaw River, MI (Federal Funds) Contributed Funds 57. St. Clair River, MI 58. St. Joseph Harbor, MI Section 111 New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 675,25162 675,25162 418,000 436,535 99,000 352,000 102,572 357,367 457,900 37,487,15963 458,313 37,487,07863 14,917,1276 14,917,127 13,600 13,600 2,227,000 1,861,000 1,902,000 2,214,730 1,839,729 1,843,746 1,020,400 77,677,65165 1,112,917 77,661,67065 19,213,246 19,213,246 593,000 829,000 442,000 618,607 812,184 453,256 826,800 26,643,908 812,947 26,608,493 0 0 0 0 540,000 825,000 1,009,000 531,891 801,974 1,036,485 1,024,000 712,000 448,000 1,020,925 719,034 447,407 976,48566 976,48566 0 828,000 0 828,000 596,400 20,030,21367 596,456 20,022,65667 296,000 301,120 8,091,451 8,085,696 21-71 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 58. St. Joseph Harbor, MI (Continued) 59. Saugatuck Harbor & Kalamazoo River, MI 60. Saxon Harbor, WI Section 111 61. Sebewaing River, MI 62. Sheboygan Harbor, WI Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 149,000 223,000 272,000 143,120 220,807 260,414 88,700 108,508 0 0 0 0 19,730 21,238 (862) 19,110 2,238 3,738 0 0 0 0 33,654 476,968 33,654 471,879 0 0 393,000 397,399 20,000 14,804 83,000 106,000 87,167 105,775 962,216 962,216 364,52768 364,52768 4,465,87869 4,462,23769 507,50770 507,50770 0 204,270 0 204,270 97,872 113,335 961,550 961,550 35,573 35,573 (8,717) 3,996,378"7 1,483 3,996,2937' 193,300 194,224 1,136,08872 1,136,08872 9,182,97073 9,181,17273 21-72 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 62. Sheboygan Harbor, WI (Continued) 63. Silver Bay Harbor, MN Contributed Funds 64. South Haven Harbor, MI Section 111 Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 0 532,000 0 532,000 Section 111 65. Sturgeon Bay, WI, and Lake Michigan Ship Canal, WI Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 536,000 538,563 273,000 277,111 0 0 38,933 99,003 40,632 85,430 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 80,227 53,693 190,000 189,999 0 0 793,000 114,000 305,000 823,504 117,970 302,690 6,189,76975 6,149,66275 1,806,933 1,805,050 1,632,076 1,632,076 1,059,72276 1,059,72276 75,900 10,666,47177 79,140 10,665,975" 21-73 0 76,530 0 60,054 0 1,923,174 1,775,000 531,352 0 496,461 (537,000) 688,628 609,028 609,028 2,600,000 2,599,999 1,238,000 1,219,980 452,42674 452,42674 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 65. Sturgeon Bay, WI, and Lake Michigan Ship Canal, WI (Continued) 66. Two Harbors, MN 67. Two Rivers Harbor, WI 68. White Lake Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 884,899 884,899 4,170,71078 4,170,71078 71,787 68,319 792 4,059 New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 16,496 6,396 0 0 221,000 1,119,000 294,000 218,220 1,103,450 305,405 (8,545) 5,246,890 1,755 5,246,890 59,360 63,946 0 0 360,32079 360,32079 8,994,58780 8,990,77980 58,057 58,057 207,862 207,862 0 249,700 0 249,700 84,333 122,703 1,929,037 122,683 108,482 1,933,426 57,000 190,000 33,314 210,090 5,266,000 10,146,594 5,277,383 10,144,648 1,173,615 1,170,019 21-74 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 77. Clinton River Spillway, MI 78. Fort Wayne Metro Area, IN Contributed Funds 79. Kawkawlin River, MI Contributed Funds Contributed Funds 80. Saginaw River-1958 Act Flint, MI New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 0 155,684 0 150,000 1,139,347 600,581 1,138,000 4,600,000 6,474,000 1,168,633 4,568,246 6,352,932 271,000 780,000 1,150,000 52,419 650,630 1,252,707 0 3,286,008 13,816 3,275,415 10,615,000 26,574,000 10,655,342 26,449,492 2,800,000 5,001,000 2,502,554 4,458,310 0 0 0 0 0 157,000 0 53,669 2,606,000 1,000,000 1,634,967 1,874,167 0 0 0 0 0 126,842 3,000 80,201 157,000 107,151 1,000,000 1,000,000 204,559 204,559 515,700 489,570 270,963 221,114 24,755,359 24,755,359 173,000 173,000 875,000 6,375,000 75,174 5,563,122 21-75 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 81. Sebewaing River, MI 85. Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters 86. St. Marys River, MI Contributed Funds New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Contrib. Cost 0 0 4,000 1,238 10,000 4,441 10,000 3,582 2,662,500 1,945,000 3,030,316 2,707,075 1,916,808 3,067,335 (14,300) 0 365,642 365,642 447,155 446,619 0 0 2,965,000 65,036,65181 2,544,210 64,842,23181 160,657,07182 160,657,07182 19,287,800 17,362,700 16,075,300 19,381,994 17,630,563 15,638,123 0 169,999 0 170,400 16,535,691 348,556,01283 16,704,004 348,201,37783 0 (319) 340,400 340,080 21-76 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 'Includes $18,889 for previous projects. 'Includes $114,786 for previous projects. 3Includes $85,849 for previous projects. 4Includes $12,008 for maintenance of previous projects. 5Excludes $30,000 contributed funds. 6Includes $25,500 for previous projects. 7lncludes $3,796 for previous projects. BIncludes $2,097,254 for previous projects. "Includes $42,470,585 fo diked disposal. '"Includes $1,547,195 for previous projects. "Includes $1,556,249 for diked disposal. '=Includes $3,239,910 for previous projects. '3Includes $89,309 for previous projects. 14Includes $1,204,500 for diked disposal. 'SIncludes $311,329 for previous projects. '"Includes $13,437 for previous project and $780,400 for diked disposal. 7lIncludes $506,437 for previous projects. 'Excludes $100,000 contributed funds. "Includes $8,918 for previous projects and $7,642,642 for diked disposal. "Excludes $127,000 contributed funds. 2'lncludes $243,100 for diked disposal. 'Includes $176,620 for previous projects. 23lncludes $127,598 for previous projects and $1,663,300 for diked disposal. 24Includes $404,300 for diked disposal. 'SIncludes $453,839 for previous projects. 26Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. 27Includes $21,818 for previous projects and $4,378,600 for diked disposal. 28Includes $149,312 for previous projects. 29Includes $88,364 for previous projects and $2,961,461 for diked disposal. 3"Includes $402,242 for previous projects and $1,523,500 for diked disposal. 31Excludes $38,190 contributed funds. 32Includes $656,000 for previous projects. 33Includes $235,346 for previous projects and $5,119,800 for diked disposal. 34Includes $491,416 for previous projects. 35Excludes $136,286 contributed funds. 3"Includes $354,999 for previous projects. "Includes $150,910 for previous projects. 38Includes $3,955 for previous projects. 39Includes $400,126 for previous projects. 4"Includes $54,288 for previous projects and $3,081,756 for diked disposal. 4 1Includes $312,423 for previous projects. 42Includes $36,194 for previous projects. 43Includes $312,423 for previous projects. "Includes $36,194 for previous projects and $593,660 for diked disposal. 45Includes $1,293,220 for previous projects. "Includes $459,305 for previous projects and $6,380,925 for diked disposal. 47Includes $38,606,400 for diked disposal. 4"Includes $83,182 contributed funds - diked disposal. 4"Includes $613,408 for previous projects. 5"Includes $446,183 for previous projects. 5"Includes $181,500 for diked disposal. "2Includes $84,569 for previous projects. 53Includes $8,181 for previous projects. 54Includes $284,802 for previous projects. 55Includes $113,326 for previous projects and $21,000 for diked disposal. "Includes $121,600 for diked disposal. 57Includes $159,000 for diked disposal. S"Includes $9,158 for diked disposal. "9Includes $188,495 for previous projects. "'Includes $15,123 for previous projects and $10,621 for diked disposal. 6'Includes $16,500 for diked disposal. "'Includes $50,084 for previous projects. "'Includes $56,608 for previous projects and $14,907,318 for diked disposal. "Includes $962,556 for previous projects. "'Includes $20,951,888 for diked disposal ($1,671,660 public works fund and $49,419 emergency relief funds) "Includes $503,113 for previous projects. "7Includes $638,076 for diked disposal. ""Includes $90,232 for previous projects. ''Includes $117,554 for previous projects. 7"Excludes $50,193 contributed funds. 71Includes $15,000 for previous projects. 72Includes $487,817 for previous projects. 73 Includes $87,131 for previous projects and $907,792 for diked disposal. 74 Includes $187,233 for previous projects. 75 Includes $131,299 for previous projects and $42,381 for diked disposal. 76 Includes $323,419 for previous projects. 77 Includes $219,730 for previous projects and $311,119 for diked disposal. 78 Includes $48,404 National Recovery Act for new work funds. 7 Includes $212,857 for previous projects. " Includes $33,113 for previous projects and $1,187,472 for diked disposal. 'Includes $3,973,897 for previous projects. 'Includes $2,904,807 for previous projects. "3Includes $13,100 for diked disposal. 21-77 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 21-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Acts Project and Work Authorized Documents Sep. 19, 1890 Mar. 2, 1919 Sep. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 ALPENA HARBOR, MI (See Section 1 of Text) Channel depth of 16 '/2 feet. Rubblemound breakwater for protecting channel on south side and widening entrance channel. 21 and 18 '/2 foot channel depths and turning basin. Present project dimensions. New turning basin. Removal of old breakwater and construction of new breakwater. Deauthorization of the feature authorized by the 1965 River and Harbor Act. ARCADIA HARBOR, MI (See Section 2 of Text) Maintenance of existing 12-foot channel. ASHLAND HARBOR, MI (See Section 3 ot Text) Breakwater 7,900 feet long and dredging to remove a shoal. Appropriation of $60,000 for 'Continuing improvements on enlarged project' (On completion of Poe Lock in 1896, with available depth of 20 feet, dredging at Ashland Harbor was carried to a similar depth.) Detached breakwater extending 4,700 feet out from shore at a point 2,600 feet east of main breakwater (prolonged) and parallel thereto. Project modified by omitting detached breakwater and defining depth and extend of channel to be dredged. Widening part of present channel for entrance channel and for basin in eastern part of harbor. Deepening east basin to 25 feet and west channel, as far as 8th Ave. West, extended to 21 feet. Widening west channel to 750 feet at its westerly end Deepening portions of east basin and west channel to 27 and 21 feet, respectively. AU SABLE HARBOR AT AU SABLE RIVER (OSCODA), MI (See Section 4 of Text) Dredging channels 12 and 10 feet deep and riprapping North Pier. BLACK RIVER (PORT HURON), MI (See Section 5 of Text) Channel from mouth of Grand Trunk R.R. Bridge. Channel from Grand Trunk R.R. Bridge to Washington Ave. Consolidation of projects for Black River at Port Huron and Mouth of Black River. Settling Basin. Deepening channel and settling basin to 20 feet, and widening to 100 feet 2 bends; 1 at the foot of 12th St., the other below the Grand Trunk R.R. Bridge. Extension of existing channel. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report, 1889, p. 2291. No Printed Report. H. Doc. 436, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 162, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 54, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. Section 107, 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act. 21-78 Annual Report, 1889, p. 2288. H. Doc. 830, 65th Cong., 2d Sess., and Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc. 1, 67th Cong., I1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 42, 72d Cong., 1st. Sess. H. Doc. 151, 88th Cong., 1st. Sess.' H. R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). H. Doc. 194, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 89, 48th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Reports, 1886, p. 1674; and 1887, p. 1966. H. Ex. Doc. 89, 48th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Reports, 1886, p. 1674; and 1887, p. 1966. H. Doc. 1698, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 133, 71st Cong., 2d Sess Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 46, 82d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 337, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 165, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.' Mar. 3, 1905 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 11, 1888 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 6, 1990 Aug. 8, 1917 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 19, 1890 Jul. 13, 1892 Sep. 22, 1922 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Apr. 23, 1970 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Acts Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 2, 1882 Oct. 28, 1965 H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' S. Ex. Doc. 12, 47th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 248, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. BLACK RIVER HARBOR, MI (UPPER PENINSULA) (See Section 6 of Text) Two converging breakwaters, an entrance channel between breakwaters, an inner channel, and an irregular harbor basin. Project depths 12 feet in approach channel and 8 feet in the river channel and basin. CEDAR RIVER HARBOR, MI (See Section 7 of Text) Dredge an entrance channel (datum at 580.69 feet above mean tide at New York) and construct two parallel piers extending lakeward from mouth of Cedar River. Modification of project to provide for two parallel entrance piers including a new rubblemound east pier with a sport fishing walkway; an entrance channel from Green Bay to mouth of Cedar River, and a turning basin. CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI (See Section 8 of Text) Channel from Lake Michigan to Round Lake protected where needed by piers and revetments. Channel from Round Lake to Lake Charlevoix. Project depth increased to 15 feet. Project depth increased to 18 feet. Restore recreational uses or provide comparable recreational uses at the South Pier. Project depth increased to 24 and 23 feet, and construction of revetment upstream of Highway Bridge. CHEBOYGAN HARBOR, MI (See Section 9 of Text) 18 1/2 foot channel. 8 1/2 foot channel. Turning Basin. 21-foot channel to East 1st St., Enlarge Turning Basin deepen to 21 feet. Breakwater. CLINTON RIVER, MI (See Section 10 of Text) Channel in River and Lake St. Clair, Pile Dike, Closing channels and making Cutoff, and revetments as needed. Widening entrance channel and constructing protected harbor basin. CORNUCOPIA HARBOR, WI (See Section 11 of Text) Entrance channel 50 feet wide and 10 feet deep between existing piers from bay to a turning basin 200 feet long, 8 feet deep, with maximum width of 180 feet, with 150- and 300-foot inner channels each 50 feet wide and 8 feet deep. Reconstruction and Federal maintenance of ease and west entrance piers, a 25-foot extension of west pier and a 300-foot extension of existing westerly inner channel at a depth of 8 feet and a width of 50 feet. S. Committee, 75th Cong., I1st Sess. H. Doc. 434, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess.' 21-79 S. Ex. Doc. 16, 44th Cong., 1st Oess. and Annual Report 1876, p. 523. No Prior Survey of Estimates. No Prior Survey of Estimates. S. Doc. 163, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.' H. Doc. 1098, 100th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 25 of the WRDA of 1988. Section 107, 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act. Annual Report, 1895, p. 2823 H. Doc. 357, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 134, 75th Cong., I1st Sess. H. Doc. 269, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. S. Doc. 199, 46th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1880, p. 2062, and H. Doc. 210, 44th Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1886, p. 219. Section 107, 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act. Aug. 14, 1876 Aug. 2, 1882 Jun 13, 1902 Jun. 20, 1938 Nov. 17, 1988 Mar. 29, 1977 Jun. 2, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 Oct. 21, 1964 Aug. 5, 1886 Jul. 19, 1963 Aug. 26, 1937 Sep. 3, 1954 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 21-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Acts Project and Work Authorized Documents Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 3 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 22 May 17, 1950 4 Mar. 21, 1956 22 Jul. 14, 1960 Aug. 13, 1968 22 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 May 28, 1908 s Jul. 27, 1916 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 30, 1930 Aug. 30, 1930 3 DETROIT RIVER, MI (See Section 12 of Text) Amherstburg Channel and removal of Grosse Ile Shoal. Fighting Island Channel. Livingstone Channel. Channel Depths of 26 and 25 feet. Channel to Wyandotte 21 feet deep and 300 feet wide through Middle Ground opposite Head of Fighting Island. Trenton Channel and Turning Basin (West of Grosse Ile). American Channel North of Belle Isle between Windmill Point and Fairway Slip, Detroit. Deepen Westerly 300 feet of Amherstburg Channel and Ballards Reef Channel below Livingstone Channel to 27 feet to provide depths adequate for 24-foot draft navigation when governing Lakes are at Datum, with necessary widening at approaches and bends and construction of necessary compensating works, Detroit River. Extend Turning Basin in Trenton Channel 600 feet. Dredge through East Draw of lower Grosse Ile Bridge and extend 300-foot width of Channel North of lower Grosse Ile Bridge. Channel Depth of 28.5 feet throughout downbound and Two-Way Channels, except in upper (27.7-foot depth) and lower (29-foot depth), Livingstone Channel, and in upbound Channel; 27-foot depth in Ballards Reef Channel below junction with Livingstone Channel, 27.5-foot depth in westerly 300-foot width of Limekiln Crossing and Amherstburg Reaches, and 28.5-foot depth in westerly 300-foot width of Hackett Beach, with necessary compensation works. Also 28.5-foot depth in Lake Erie from Detroit River to Pelee Passage Shoal, inclusive. Trenton Channel: Deepen to 25 feet, where necessary, Wyandotte Reach from Detroit River to Upper Grosse Ile Bridge, about 5.5 miles, deepen to 28 feet and widen to 300 feet below Upper Grosse Ile Bridge to and including a Turning Basin 28 feet deep and 15 feet across in area outside project limits. Trenton Channel: Deepen to 28 feet and widen to 300 feet from Upper Turning Basin at Trenton to Gibraltar, about 20,500 feet from downstream: Construct a Turning Basin at Gibraltar at a depth of 28 feet, width of 830 feet, and length of 1,500 feet: Build compensating works to maintain water levels. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN AND WI (See Section 13 of Text) Dredging. Rebuilding piers at Superior Entry. Enlarge plan for Superior Entry and additional dredging near draw span of Burlington Northern railway bridge. Dredging additional area of basin inside Duluth entrance to 22-foot depth. Enlarging Superior Harbor Basin. Removal of shoal point at southerly end of East Gate Basin. Howards Bay Channel, 20 feet deep. Deepening and widening channels and basins. H. Doc. 712, 56th Cong., 1st. Sess. and 40, 58th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 17, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 266, 59th Cong., 1st Sess.; 676, 61st Cong., 2d Sess.; and 322, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st. Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 205, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 734, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 30, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 319, 86th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 338, 90th Cong., 2d Sess.' H.Ex. Doc. 59, 53d Cong., 3rd Sess. and Annual Report, 1895, p. 2538. H. Doc. 82, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 221, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 651, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 1018, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 145, 69th Cong., 1st Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 32, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 482, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. 21-80 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Acts Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 16, 1952 4,6 Jul. 14, 1960 7.22 Oct. 4, 1961 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 5, 1886 Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1925 8,22 Jun. 26, 1934 9 Jul. 3, 1958 'o Oct. 31, 1992 Jun. 23, 1866 " Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 27, 1965 Jun. 23, 1866 Jun. 14, 1880 Sep. 19, 1890 Jul. 13, 1892 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Nov. 17, 1986 Deepen Superior Front Channel and a portion of East Gate Basin to 25 feet. Present project dimensions of channels and basin. Abandons northerly portion of 21st Avenue West Channel. Deepen portions of the North and South Channels, the entire Upper Channel and Minnesota Channel to 27 feet; widen the Cross Channel turning basin to 1,500 feet; widen the bend at the Arrowhead Bascule Bridge to 600 feet, and construct an upland CDF. FOX RIVER, WI (See Section 14 of Text) Improvement of Fox River. Dredging Fond du Lac Harbor on Lake Winnebago. Improvement of Wolf River. Improvement of Stockbridge, of Calumet and Miller Bay, and of Brothertown Harbor, on Lake Winnebago. Increased depth in rock cuts on lower river, widen Neenah Channel, and a concrete retaining wall at Kaukauna. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Sec. 108, that Federal project structure, appurtenances, and real property of Upper Fox River, WI, be disposed of to State of Wisconsin. Sec. 332 authorized transfer of navigation system to Wisconsin subject to agreement, Federal government to continue water regulation/dam operation. FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI (See Section 15 of Text) A New Outlet 12 feet deep protected by Piers and Revetments. Exterior Breakwaters, removal of portions of Piers, Project Dimensions of Outer Basin. Dredge the area in Lake Betsie. Deepen approach and entrance channels. Extend Inner Basin and Dredge recreational anchorage area. GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MI (See Section 16 of Text) Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Present Project dimensions of Harbor channel to Grand Trunk Car Ferry Slip and River Channel. Eliminating all of that portion of Grand River above Bass River, Consolidation of Projects for Harbor and River. Channel to Spring Lake. Present Project Dimensions of Harbor Channel from Car Ferry Slip to Grand Trunk Railway Bridge and Turning Basin. Deepen the harbor entrance channel and harbor river channel to 29 and 27 feet, respectively; provide a new and larger turning basin, trapezoidal in shape, 1,200 feet long at the channel, 300 feet long at the shore, 800 feet at a right angle to the channel, and 18 feet deep. H. Doc. 374, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 150, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.; H. Doc. 196, 86th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 204, 99th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 202a of WRDA of 1986. Annual Report, 1885, pp. 2041-2045 (plan of a board approach Dec. 10, 1884, as modified by Corps of Engineers, May 14, 1886). H. Ex. Doc. 24, 51st Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report, 1890, p. 2390. No prior survey or estimates. No prior survey or estimates. No prior survey or estimates. H. Doc. 294, 68th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Bill 3910, 85th Cong., 2d Sess. Public Law 102-580 (WRDA of 1992). H. Doc. 482, 5th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 208, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 511, 74th Cong., 2d Sess., S. Doc 16, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Ex. Doc 42, 35th Cong., 1st. Sess. S. Ex. Doc 42, 35th Cong., 1st. Sess. S. Ex. Doc 42, 35th Cong., 1st. Sess. S. Ex. Doc 42, 35th Cong., 1st. Sess. S. Doc. 88, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.' H. Doe. 661, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess.' H. Doc. 227, 98th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 202a of WRDA of 1986. 21-81 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 21-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Acts Project and Work Authorized Documents Jun. 14, 1880 Jun. 14, 1880 May 17, 1950 Jun. 23, 1866 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 26, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 2 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 17, 1986 1948 June 26, 1964 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 3, 1871 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 16, 1984 Mar. 2, 1945 GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MI (See Section 17 of Text) Existing project, except for pile dike. For pile dike. 800-foot extension of West Pier. GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI (See Section 18 of Text) Outer Channel and revetment at Grassy Island. 12 Inner channel.13 Turning basin at DePere. Maintenance of turning basin at DePere. Increasing depth of inner channel and turning basin to 18 feet. Deepen outer channel to 22 feet with widening and straightening inside of Tail Point Bend, widen channel in Fox River through city of Green Bay to 22 feet. Turning basin above Chicago & North Western R.R. Bridge. Turning basin at mouth of East River. Deepen and widen 9 miles of entrance channel to 26 by 500 feet; 3.6 miles of entrance channel to 24 by 300 feet; and 3.2 miles of existing Fox River to 24 feet deep. Deepen the Fox River channel at Green Bay, WI, to 27 feet. GREILICKVILLE HARBOR, MI (See Section 19 of Text) Basin 600-foot wide, 850-foot long with a depth of 14 feet in outer 350 feet of the area and a 10-foot depth in remainder. Breakwater 1,300 feet long. Attached Rubblemound Breakwater and Breakwater extension. HAMMOND BAY HARBOR, MI (See Section 20 of Text) Harbor of Refuge, breakwaters, 10-foot depth in harbor basin, 12-foot depth in entrance channel. HARBOR BEACH, LAKE HURON, MI (See Section 21 of Text) Adopted Site and made provision for harbor. Closing North Entrance and dredging Main Entrance and Anchorage Area. Removal of portion of Breakwater in interest of sanitation. Deepen the waterway within the Marina facility. HARRISVILLE HARBOR, MI (See Section 22 of Text) Harbor of Refuge, Breakwaters; 12-foot depth entrance channel 10-foot depth in harbor basin. Extend north end of south breakwater 100 feet; extend southeast end of north breakwater 145 feet; install two navigation light structures. Specified in Act, Annual Report 1881, p. 2050 Annual Report, 1895, p. 351 H. Doc. 751, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. Annual Report, 1867, p. 70. Unpublished report approved Aug. 3, 1892. H. Doc. 222, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1017, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 294, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 40, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 73, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 95, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 470, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' H.R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986, Sec. 601c). River and Harbor Act. H. Doc. 546, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. River and Harbor Act. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1873, p. 282; H. Doc. 1700, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. H.R. 5653, 98th Cong., 2d Sess.; P.L. 98-360 (98 Stat. 405) Sec. 105. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. 21-82 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Acts Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1852 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 3, 1905 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Sep. 3, 1954 22 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 2, 1964 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 1935 2 May 17, 1950 Oct. 23, 1962 22 Mar. 3, 1881 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 2,14 Jul. 14, 1960 Sep. 19, 1890 HOLLAND HARBOR, MI (See Section 23 of Text) Artificial channel between Lakes Macatawa and Michigan.' 2 Piers and Revetments.' 2 Extending Inner Piers. Converging Breakwater. Channel to Holland and Turning Basin at Holland. Present Project Dimensions of Channels at Turning Basin. Widen Bend in Revetted Entrance Channel into Lake Macatawa, Dredge Channel in Black River, and Widen and Extend Turning Basin. THE INLAND ROUTE, MI (See Section 24 of Text) Channel 30 feet wide and 5 feet deep through Lakes and Rivers with suitable jetties. Lock and Dam. KENOSHA HARBOR, WI (See Section 25 of Text) Parallel piers and 600 feet of breakwater.' 2 Extending Breakwater 200 feet. Present project dimensions of entrance channel and basin. Channel northwesterly from basin. Deepen lake approach channel to 27 feet and 800 feet wide; deepen approach channel to 26 feet, entrance channel and inner basin to 25 feet. KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI (See Section 26 of Text) Entrance piers. Turning basin. North breakwater, remove old north pier, widen and deepen entrance channel and turning basin to 20 feet and remove outer south shoal. Enlarge existing turning basin, extend existing project into north basin, and increase depth of north basin to 20 feet at a maximum width of 500 feet and eliminate removal of outer shoal. KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI (See Section 27 of Text) Acquision of waterway; for a 16-foot channel of 70-foot bottom width, renew canal revetments, reconstruct and extend piers at upper entrance to 30-foot depth of water, and at proper time for increase of channel depth to 20 feet with bottom width of not less than 120 feet (increase in width and depth of channel approved May 15, 1898). S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report, 1866, p. 106. H. Doc. 272, 51st Cong., 2d Sess.; and Annual Report 1887, p. 2950. Annual Report, 1905, p. 2176; .H. Doc. 588, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 48, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 282, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 142, 82d Cong., 1st Sess.' Chief of Engineers. H. Doc. 328, 54th Cong., 2d Sess.; Annual Report, 1897, p. 2772; H. Doc. 164, 55th Cong., 3rd Sess.; Annual Report, 1899, p. 1817. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 5th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 750, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 496, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report, 1881, p. 2082. H. Doc. 324, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 19, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Ex. Doc. 105, 49th Cong., 2d Sess.; and Annual Report, 1887, p. 1977. 21-83 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 21-B Date of Authorizing Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 15 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 5, 1886 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1933 3 Mar. 21, 1956 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Anchorage basin just within lower entrance about one-half mile long, 800 feet wide; a mooring pier on its westerly side 2,000 feet in length, and for purchase of necessary land. Princess Point Cutoff channel. General deepening, widening and straightening of channels and basins to provide 25-foot depth with additional overdepth at entrances, extend lower entrance breakwater, and necessary alteration or replacement of structures due to deepening channels. Deauthorization of the uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1935 Rivers and Harbors Act. KNIFE RIVER HARBOR, MN (See Section 28 of Text) Dredging. Breakwater and modified channels. Construction of measures to correct the design deficiencies which results in unsatisfactory entrance and mooring conditions. LAC LA BELLE HARBOR, MI (See Section 29 of Text) Two parallel piers at the entrance, 584 and 682 feet; an entrance channel between the piers 50 feet wide and 12 feet deep, 820 feet long with a flared approach and inner canal 50 feet wide, 10 feet deep, and 730 feet long. LAKE ST. CLAIR, MI, CHANNELS (See Section 30 of Text) Two Dikes. Deepening Canal and dredging Channel at Grosse Pointe. Second Canal for downbound vessels. 21-foot depth in Grosse Pointe Channel for about 5.25 miles. 25-foot depth through Canals and Channel through Lake St. Clair. Removal of Center Dike and widening Channel to 700 feet. Deepening Channel to 27.5 feet and abandonment of Channel above mouth of Southeast bend cutoff Channel. LELAND HARBOR, MI (See Section 31 of Text) Entrance Channel protected by Piers. Outer Breakwater, Anchorage Area, Approach Channel and removal of North Pier. LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI (See Section 32 of Text) Approach Channel and Maneuver Area Protected by Breakwaters.' H. Doc. 325, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 835, 63rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 55, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess.' H.R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). H. Doc. 686, 77th Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual report for 1949. H. Doc. 463, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.0 Annual Report, 1961, p. 1039. Annual Report, 1885, p. 2150. H. Doc. 297, 51st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 234, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 188, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 23, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 413, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 301, 88th Cong., 2d Sess.' LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI (See Section 33 of Text) 12-foot deep Channel from Lake Superior into Little Lake Breakwaters and Revetments. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' 21-84 Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Y _..__ _.. -. -_ _._ ___. ._ __ DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Acts Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 2, 1867 Sep. 19, 1890 Jul. 25, 1912 Jul. 3, 1920 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 1935 "7 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 23, 1962 29 Dec. 31, 1968 (Sec. 107 of 1960 R & H) Jun. 26, 1979 Mar. 2, 1867 Aug. 11, 1888 LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI (See Section 34 of Text) Entrance Piers. Pier Extension, Reconstruction and repairs to existing structures and present project dimensions of Channel. Breakwaters, Shore Connections, and Removal of outer ends of the two inner piers. Deepen Channels and widen opening between breakwaters. MANISTEE HARBOR, MI (See Section 35 of Text) Entrance Piers. Extending Channel 8,000 feet to connect with Manistee Lake, and further Pier extension. Depth of 20 feet in Outer Harbor 570 feet wide to Outer end of South Pier 18 feet deep in river, South Breakwater with shore connection, and extend North Pier if required. 23-foot depths in entrance channel and 21-foot depths in River Channel. Remove old South Revetment, Construct new South Pier and Revetment, and widen river entrance Channel. Present project dimensions of Channel through Outer Basin and River, and Federal participation in cost of replacing Maple Street Bridge. MANISTIQUE HARBOR, MI (See Section 36 of Text) Breakwaters and Outer Harbor. Present location of West Breakwater and Pier at River Mouth. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WI (See Section 37 of Text) Breakwaters. Present project dimensions of channel through outer basin, removal of old north stub pier, and approach channel to a proposed city terminal south of shore end of south breakwater. Channel in river. Deepen Lake approach to 25 feet by 800 feet wide, deepen outer harbor to 25 feet, river channel to 23 feet to 8th Street, and Upper River Channel to 22 feet to Soo Line R.R. Dredge River Channel to 12 feet from Soo Line R.R. 720 feet upstream. Construct 765-foot long stone Breakwater, and rubblemound bulkhead; construct 360-foot long entrance Breakwater; dredge 16,500 cubic yards for entrance channel. MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI (See Section 38 of Text) Breakwaters, 2,000 feet long. Extending the breakwater 1,000 feet. Annual Report, 1867, p. 114.16 H. Doc. 273, 54th Cong., 2d Sess.; and Annual Report, 1897, p. 2951. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess.; and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess.'6 H. Doc. 342, 91st Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report, 1867, p. 115. Annual Report, 1891, P. 2678. H. Doc. 599, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 131, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 380, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 358, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 429, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1908, p. 648, and Unpublished Report of Mar. 13, 1908; Approved by Secretary of War, Apr. 3, 1908. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess., as modified by Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 39, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 80, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 479, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Jun. 1967 Detailed Project Report Apr. 1982 Supplement.' Sec. 107, 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act. H. Ex. Doc. 56, 39th Cong., 2d Sess., pts. 1 and 2; and Annual Report, 1866, pp. 8 and 77. Annual Report, 1889, pp. 272 and 2021. 21-85 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 21-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Acts Project and Work Authorized Documents Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 Jul. 11, 1960 Mar. 3, 1871 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 4, 1913 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Jun. 27, 1967 (Sec. 107) Aug. 30, 1852 Mar. 3, 1883 Mar. 2, 1907 Sep. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 1935 22 Mar. 2, 1945 18 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Feb. 24, 1835 19 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 14, 1932 21 Nov. 17, 1986 Additional 1,500-foot extension to breakwater and removing a shoal in northerly part of harbor. Deepening harbor to 25 feet. Deepening harbor to 27 feet. MENOMINEE HARBOR AND RIVER, MI AND WI (See Section 39 of Text) Entrance piers. Consolidation of project for harbor and river, and a channel 18 feet deep. Partial restoration of work above bridge which had been eliminated by Act of May 3, 1905. 20-foot depth in channel and 18-foot depth in turning basin. 21-foot depth in channel and turning basin and enlarge turning basin. Extend channel 12 feet deep to vicinity of Marinette Yacht Club. Deepen existing approach channel to 26 feet, entrance and river channels to 24 feet and enlarge turning basin. Deepen 1,100 feet of river channel generally north of Marinette Corp. facilities to 19 feet. MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI (See Section 40 of Text) North Pier.12 Inner 7,600 feet of breakwater.' 2 South pier. Extending north breakwater 1,000 feet. Extend north breakwater; a south breakwater; present project dimensions of inner entrance channel. Dredging a portion of outer harbor to 21-foot depth. Dredging river channels to 21-foot depth. Deepen South Menominee and Burnham Canals to 21 feet. Deepen an approach channel to 30 feet by 800 feet wide and 300 feet wide through breakwater; deepen entrance channel 28 feet through piers, outer harbor to 28 feet south of entrance channel, and a channel to 27 feet in Milwaukee River to Buffalo Street, and in Kinnickinnic River to Chicago & North Western R.R. bridges. MONROE HARBOR, MI (See Section 41 of Text) 9-foot channel, protecting Revetments and Piers. 21-foot channel, dikes and turning basin. 20 Modified Conditions of Local Cooperation imposed by Act of Jul. 3, 1930. Deepen portion of existing navigation channel to 27 feet; deepen lake channel to 28 feet; widen the channel from 200 to 500 feet; dredge a new turning basin 24 feet deep, 1,600 feet wide at river's mouth; and construct a 190 acre CDF in Plum Creek Bay to enable creation of a 700 acre marsh behind the CDF. H. Doc. 573, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 154, 86th Cong., I1st Sess.' Annual Report, 1867, p. 132. H. Doc. 419, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 171, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 228, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 113, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Detailed Project Report, Dec. 1966.' S. Doc. 175, 25th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1881, p. 2122. Annual Report, 1906, p. 1752 (No prior survey or estimate affecting breakwater extensions). H. Doc. 804, 66th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 289, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 29, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 285, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 134, 87th Cong., 1st Sess.' Annual Report, 1872, p. 237. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 22, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 12, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.; 45, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). 21-86 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Acts Project and Work Authorized Documents Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Aug. 2, 1882 Jun. 25, 1910 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 23, 1962 29 Nov. 17, 1986 Jan. 3, 1996 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1873 Jul. 5, 1881 Jul. 13, 1892 Mar. 25, 1907 Aug. 18, 1894 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1945 MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI (See Section 42 of Text) Piers and Revetments. Breakwaters. Repairing Revetments around Car Ferry Slip. Channel deepening and present project dimensions of channel. Piers and Revetments. NEW BUFFALO HARBOR, MI (See Section 43 of Text) Entrance channel 10 feet deep by 80 to 180 feet wide and 850 feet long to mouth of Galien River, new north and south breakwaters 1,305 and 740 feet, respectively, deepening inner channel to Galien River to 8 feet and 80 feet wide and 1,250 feet long. OCONTO HARBOR, WI (See Section 44 of Text) Piers, except for inner 300 feet of south pier and 250 feet north pier built by city.2 Present project dimensions of channel and turning basin. ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI (See Section 45 of Text) Channel 17 feet deep and 150 feet wide through bar and 15 feet deep and 100 feet wide between piers, and pier maintenance. Modified project widths and provide inner basin. Enlarging and deepening the existing harbor basin. Deauthorization of the turning basin feature of the project authorized by the 1962 Rivers and Harbors Act. Reauthorization of the turning basin feature which was deauthorized (Sec. 1002) in WRDA 86. PENTWATER HARBOR, MI (See Section 46 of Text) Piers and revetments, dredging. Piers and revetments, dredging. Piers and revetments, dredging. Piers and revetments, dredging. Present project depth of channel. PETOSKEY HARBOR, MI (See Section 47 of Text) Breakwaters according to larger of two projects. Removal of north breakwater and extension of west breakwater if cost did not exceed $170,000. POINT LOOKOUT HARBOR, (AU GRES RIVER), MI (See Section 48 of Text) Breakwater, Anchorage Area, Channel Dredging. H. Doc. 104, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 494, 67th Cong., 4th Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doec. 64, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 474, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 474, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1881, p. 2066. H. Doc. 538, 61st Cong., 2d Sess., Plan C.' H. Doc. 602, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. S. Committee print, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 287, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). Sec. 363 (e) of WRDA 1996 H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 181, 39th Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report 1890, p. 2673 Annual Report 1895, p. 2819 Annual Report 1896, p. 2722 H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. 21-87 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 21-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Acts Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 16, 1984 Jul. 11, 1987 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 11, 1870 Aug. 14, 1876 Aug. 30, 1935 27 Jul. 3, 1958 28 Jan. 3, 1996 Jun. 13, 1902 Jun. 30, 1948 Aug. 5, 1977 Mar. 3, 1879 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Aug. 30, 1935 Jul. 14, 1960 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug.30, 19352.24,25 Jul. 3, 1958 2 Oct. 23, 1962 2 PORT AUSTIN HARBOR, MI (See Section 49 of Text) Breakwater, Anchorage Basin, Channel Dredging. Construct a breakwater access for recreation purposes. Breakwater. PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI (See Section 50 of Text) Entrance Channel 12 feet deep, Anchorage Basin, Breakwater. PORT WASHINGTON HARBOR, WI (See Section 51 of Text) North pier and south basin.' 2 North basin. North breakwater, removal of 650 feet of north pier, outer turning basin, present project dimensions of channel and basin and extension of south breakwater. Extending and raising of north breakwater and placing rubble along sides; removing 456 feet of south breakwater and dredging in outer basin. Deauthorization of portion of the navigation project. PORT WING HARBOR, WI (See Section 52 of Text) Construction of parallel piers and dredging. Dredging inner channels and abandonment of certain revetments and channels. Deauthorization of 50 feet of entrance channel widening. PORTAGE LAKE HARBOR, MI (See Section 53 of Text) Entrance channel 18 feet deep protected by piers and revetments. PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, MI (See Section 54 of Text) Breakwater, 1,000 feet long. Shore extension, 216 feet long. For dredging and rubblemound extension to breakwater 1,600 feet long; Changed designation of project. Deepening harbor from 26 and 28 feet to 28 and 30 feet, respectively. ROUGE RIVER, MI (See Section 55 of Text) 21-foot channel via the Shortcut Canal 25-foot channel at mouth of Old Channel, 1,425 feet long and adjacent to latter; 21-foot channel extending from junction of Old Channel and Shortcut Canal into Old Channel to Detroit, Toledo & Ironton R.R. Bridge. Old Channel; 100 feet wide from Peerless Cement Corp. to Junction with Shortcut Canal widened to 150 feet at 2 bends. 25-foot channel over modified limits from Detroit River to Jefferson Avenue (via Shortcut Canal). H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H. R. 5653, 98th Cong., 2d Sess. P. L. 98-360 (98 Stat. 405) Sec. 106 P. L. 100-71. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 28, 41st Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report, 1879, p. 119. Annual Report, 1876, pt. 2, p. 379. H. Doc. 168, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 74th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 446, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess.' Sec. 501(17) of WRDA of 1996. H. Doc. 114, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 668, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1879, p. 1634 30 H. Doc. 318, 54th Cong., 1st. Sess.; Annual Report, 1903, pp. 474, 1823 H. Doc. 473, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 145, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 1063, 64th Cong., 2d Sess.23 H. Doc. 125, 85th Cong., 1st. Sess. H. Doc. 509, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' 21-88 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Acts Project and Work Authorized Documents Jun. 25, 1910 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 13, 1892 Jul. 8, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 22 Mar. 21, 1956 22 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 3, 1875 Jun. 14, 1880 Mar. 3, 1899 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 2, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 3, 1958 Jun. 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 1910 SAGINAW RIVER, MI (See Section 56 of Text) Channel 200 feet wide, with depth of 18.5 feet in Bay and 16.5 feet in River. Project Depth of 18.5 feet extended up River to Saginaw. Turning Basin. Present project channel dimensions from Bay to Sixth Street Bridge in Saginaw. New Channel in Bay, 350 feet wide and 24 feet deep from 24-foot contour to River Mouth, Project Depth of 24 feet in River Channel up to Detroit & Mackinac Railway Bridge, Project Depth of 22 feet in River Channel up to Sixth Street Bridge, Turning Basins at Essexville and Carrollton, and elimination of present Channel in Bay. Deepen Bay Channel, Deepen River Channel to Detroit & Mackinac Bridge, Extend 22-foot project above Sixth Street Bridge, Deepen Essexville Turning Basin, and Construct 2 new Turning Basins.3 Deepen River Channel to 25 feet, from Detroit & Mackinac Bridge to New York Central Railroad Bridge. ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI (See Section 57 of Text) 20-foot Channel in the River. Deepen Channel to 25 and 26 feet, and Compensating Works. Widening Channel at Southeast Bend to 700 feet. Widen and deepen Southeast Bend and improve Outlet of North Channel, St. Clair River. Deepen and further improve Channels in St. Clair River between limits of 27.1 to 30 feet to provide safe navigation by vessels with drafts of 25.5 feet. A cutoff Channel in Canada at Southeast Bend and abandon old Southeast Bend Channels. Deauthorization of the work authorized by the Rivers and Harbors Act of Jul. 24, 1946. ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MI (See Section 58 of Text) Interior Revetments.2 6 Benton Harbor Canal.26 Present project dimensions of piers and a turning basin. Present project dimensions of the channel and turning basin near mouth of Paw Paw River. Abandon easterly 1,000 feet of canal above west line of 9th Street. Turning basin above mouth of Morrison Channel and eliminate turning basin near mouth of Paw Paw River. Maintenance of turning basin near mouth of Paw Paw River. SAUGATUCK HARBOR AND KALAMAZOO RIVER, MI (See Section 59 of Text) Entrance Channel, Piers and Revetments. Deepening entrance to 16 feet. Deepening Channel in River to 14 feet. H. Doc. 740, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 30, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 576, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 500, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 554, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 240, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 207, 51st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 309, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. H. R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). H. Ex. Doc. 160, 43rd Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1875, pt. 1, p. 162. Annual Report, 1880, pp. 2030, 2031, 2049, and 2055. H. Doc. 307, 55th Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1898, p. 2496. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 52, 74th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 129, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 95, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 912, 54th Cong., Ist Sess.; Annual Report, 1896, Vol. 2, Pt. 5, p. 2739. Annual Report, 1907, p. 6416. H. Doc. 635, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. 21-89 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 21-B Date of Authorizing Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Proiect and Work Authorized Jul. 3, 1958 Jun. 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Sep. 3, 1954 River and Harbors Act, H. Doc. 169, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.,' Annual Report for 1965, p. 1025. H. Doc 71, 54th Cong., I1st Sess. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 475, 68th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 47, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 554, 82d Cong., 2d Sess.' SAXON HARBOR, WI (See Section 60 of Text) Provides for east and west breakwaters, an outer channel 10 feet deep, an inner basin and side channel 8 feet deep, and diversion of Oronto Creek to Parkers Creek by 3 short reaches of channel excavation and a levee. SEBEWAING RIVER, MI (See Section 61 of Text) Entrance Channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 15,000 feet long in Saginaw Bay. SHEBOYGAN HARBOR, WI (See Section 62 of Text) North breakwater. Preserving south pier as part of project, providing turning basin, and elimination of proposed south breakwaters. Present project dimensions of channel. Widen and deepen outer harbor entrance channel to 450 feet, widen and deepen river channel from present project limit to north side of Jefferson Avenue. SILVER BAY HARBOR, MN (See Section 63 Text) Provides for a Harbor of Refuge for small craft. SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI (See Section 64 of Text) Channel from Inner End of Piers to Highway Bridge.12 Present dimensions of Piers and for a Turning Basin. Present project dimensions of Channel and Turning Basin. Turning Basin deauthorized. STURGEON BAY AND LAKE MICHIGAN SHIP CANAL, WI (See Section 65 of Text) Breakwaters. 12 Acquision of the canal. Canal revetments and consolidation of canal and harbor works. Present project dimensions of channels and elimination of turning basin immediately west of revetted canal. Turning basin between city and Bushman wharves. TWO HARBORS, MN (See Section 66 of Text) Breakwater and dredging. Construction of two breakwater piers. Shore connection to east breakwater and dredging maneuvering area. Construct new east breakwater and enlargement of maneuvering basin. Deepen harbor project depths from 26 and 28 feet to 28 and 30 feet, respectively. No Prior Survey or Estimate. H. Doc. 119, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess.' and Unpublished review Report of Chief of Engineers, dated Dec. 21, 1934. Public Law 102-580 (Section 116 of WRDA of 1992). H. Ex. Doc. 34, 42d Cong., 2d Sess.; Annual Report, 1872, p. 171. H. Ex. Doc. 106, 49th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 117, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 421, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 94, 48th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1887, p. 1952. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 17, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 805, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 146, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.' 21-90 Documents Sec. 104 (7), P.L. 102-580 (WRDA 1992) Oct. 31, 1992 Aug. 11, 1888 Mar. 3, 1905 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 31, 1992 Mar. 3, 1873 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 13, 1902 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 30, 1935 Nov. 7, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 ----- DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Acts Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1871 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 1935 22 Jul. 3, 1958 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1873 Jul. 5, 1884 Jul. 13, 1892 Mar. 2, 1907 Jul. 24, 1946 Nov. 5, 1990 Oct. 30, 1990 Apr. 7, 1966 Nov. 17, 1986 TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WI (See Section 67 of Text) South pier, 750 feet of north pier, and about 44 feet of north revetment.' 2 Remainder of north pier and stilling basin. Deepening entrance channel and inner basin to 18 feet. Extend existing project in West Twin River to 18 feet deep and in East Twin River to 10 feet deep to 22nd Street Bridge. WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI (See Section 68 of Text) New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. Present project depth of Channel. CLINTON RIVER SPILLWAY, MI (See Section 77 of Text) Construction of a cutoff canal with control weirs. Completed project review due to significantly changed physical conditions. FORT WAYNE METRO AREA, IN (See Section 78 of Text) Provides 100-year level of flood protection to part of central area of city of Fort Wayne, IN. KAWKAWLIN RIVER, MI (See Section 79 of Text) Deepening River Channel, altering Railway Bridge. Riprapping portions of Channel bottom, and utility relocations. Provides that the Federal share of the cost of operation and maintenance of the project shall be 50 percent. Annual Report, 1871, p. 123 (as modified by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 27, 1897). H. Doc. 730, 59th Cong., 1st Sess., Modification of Plan A. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 25, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 362, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.' Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. No Prior Survey or Estimate.3' H. Doc. 694, 79th Cong., 2d Sess.' Section 216 Reconnaissance Report, September 1991. Public Law 101-640 (Section 101 of WRDA of 1990) Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act. H.R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (Sec. 837 of W.R.D.A. of 1986) SAGINAW RIVER, MI, FLOOD CONTROL (See Section 80 of Text) Flood control improvements to Saginaw River and its tributaries including Tittabawassee, Shiawassee, Flint, and Cass Rivers. One-time O&M repairs at Flint Unit to restore project to original dimensions. Provides funding for continuing O&M repairs at Flint Unit. Project is modified to include as part of the project the design and construction of an inflatable dam. SEBEWAING RIVER, MI (See Section 81 of Text) Enlarging present Channel of Sebewaing River, altering Railroad and Highway Bridges, removal of Dike. H. Doc. 346, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.' Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1992, (P.L. 102-104). Energy and Water Resources Appropriation Act of 1993, H.R. 5373, (P.L. 102-377). H. Doc. 286, 76th Cong. 1st Sess.' 21-91 Jul. 3, 1958 Aug. 17, 1991 Oct. 8, 1992 Jan. 3, 1996 Aug. 18, 1941 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 21-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Acts Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 11, 1870 Aug. 5, 1886 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 13, 1902 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1905 Mar. 3, 1907 Mar. 3, 1909 Jul. 25, 1912 Mar. 4, 1915 Sep. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Jun. 26, 1934 9 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 7, 1942 Jun. 15, 1943 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Mar. 21, 1956 Jul. 9, 1956 Nov. 17, 1986 ST. MARYS RIVER, MI (See Section 86 of Text) Weitzel Lock (Replaced in 1943 by MacArthur Lock), widen and deepen existing State Channel.26 Poe Lock.' Dredging through shoals above falls and shoals below falls between lower end of Canal and upper entrance Channel into Lake Nicolet (formerly Hay Lake). Enlarging the Old Channel. Lake Nicolet and Neebish Channels work in that section of River below Locks. Davis Lock Second Canal, and Emergency Dam. Lease of Waterpower at Falls, Lease entered into with Michigan Northern Power Company provided for construction of remedial and compensating works. Fourth Lock (Renamed 'Sabin' Lock in 1943). Deepen Tailrace of Power Plant. Widen upper approach to Canals through Vidal Shoals, extend anchorage and maneuver area below locks. Remove Round Island, middle ground extension of Northwest Canal Pier, and widen Channels Middle Neebish Route. Deepen Channels throughout downbound Route. Operation and Care of Canal and Locks provided from War Department Appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Widen Brush Point Turn and Channel from Brush Point to Point Louise. Construct new (MacArthur) Lock on site of former Weitzel Lock, deepen approach Channels to 27 feet, and reconstruct approach Piers. Name 'MacArthur' Lock and changed name of 'Fourth' Lock to 'Sabin' Lock. Remove Bridge Island and construct new Hydroelectric Power Plant. Replace Poe Lock at St. Marys Falls Canal with a new structure 800 feet long, 100 feet wide and 32 feet deep with necessary construction of Nose and Center Piers, and widen and deepen Channel across Point Iroquois Shoals and in Lake Nicolet to provide wider anchorage and maneuver areas in St. Marys River. Deepen to provide a Project Safe Draft of 25.5 feet over full width to downbound and 2-way Channels (including anchorage areas) and over Westerly 300-foot width of upbound Middle Neebish Channel, when levels of Lakes Superior and Huron are at their respective LWD's. Repeal Authorization of Bridge as a part of Project, authorize alteration with cost to be apportioned by Sec. 6, Truman Hobbs Act, Jun. 21, 1940. Construct a second large lock 1,294 feet in length, 115 feet in width, and 32 feet in depth, adjacent to the existing lock. The replacement lock is to be located in the North Canal of the St. Marys Falls Canal at Sault Ste. Marie, MI, on the site of the existing Davis and Sabin Locks. Report by Maj. O.M. Poe, Corps of Engineers, not published. H. Ex. Doc. 72, 49th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 207, 51st Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1891, p. 2810. H. Doc. 138, 56th Cong., 2d Sess., and 215, 58th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 128, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 215, 56th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 333, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. (Plan 3). H. Doc. 65, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. District Engineer Report, Oct. 29, 1920. H. Doc. 270, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 53, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 218, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 679, 78th Cong., 2d Sess., and 339, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' None. H. R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). 21-92 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-B (Contin Date of Authorizing Acts ued) AUleTd HOR~I ZIANUTGHR IZLLNGGI ESLTGIT ISLATION Project and Work Authorized 'Contains latest published map. 2Including Emergency Relief Administration Work authorized May 28, 1935. 3Included in Public Works Administration Program September 6, 1933. 4This modification deauthorized August 5, 1977, under Section 12, Public Law 93-251. SAdministrative Act, Section 4. 6Public Law 568, 82d Congress. 7Public Law 388, 87th Congress. 8This portion inactive. 9Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. '0Transfer completed June 1962. "Amended 1868, 1879, 1892. '2Completed under previous project. !3Included in Public Works Administration Program January 3, 1934. '4Inactive portion; removal of 200 linear feet of north pier, widening inner 200 feet of channel through outer basin, and closing gap in north shore connection of breakwater. '5Latest published map is in Annual Report, 1914, p. 2974. '6Latest published map in Annual Report, 1914, p. 2914. "'Superseded by Act of October 23, 1962. '8Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (dredging Milwaukee River from Buffalo Street Bridge to North Humboldt Avenue Bridge). '9Modified by Act of June 10, 1872. 20Riprapping of protecting dikes portion of project is inactive. 2'War Department Appropriations Act. 22Uncompleted portion deauthorized December 31, 1989, under Section 1001, P.L. 99-662. 23Contains latest published maps. See also map with Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. 24Except for dredging 25-foot channel to 1,150 feet upstream of mouth of old channel, work authorized in this Act is considered inactive. 25This modification deauthorized August 5, 1977, under Section 12, Public Law 93-251. 26Completed under previous projects. Public Law 130, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. 27Work recommended in H. Doc. 588, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. 28Deauthorized in 1977. 29 'his modification deauthorized December 31, 1989, under Section 1001, P.L. 99-662. 30Latest published map is in H. Doc. 588, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. 3'Latest published map is in H. Doc. 2053, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. 21-93 Documents -r .. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 21-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 30, 1998 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual & Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Algoma Harbor, WI Completed 1996 292,010' 1,617,159 Alternative Technology Project, Duluth Active ---- 0 83,381 Bayfield Harbor, WI Completed 1979 183,855 162,603 Bayport Harbor, MI Completed 1996 93,597 586,137 Bell River, MI Completed 1980 24,301 130,611 Beaver Bay, MN Active 1982 293,000 2,818 Big Bay Harbor, MI Completed 1996 396,9432 1,505,579 Big Suamico River, WI Completed 1996 20,243 1,218,094 Black River (lcona Co), MI Inactive 1907 0 878 Bolles Harbor, MI Completed 1996 472,916 3,635,355 Caseville Harbor, MI Completed 1996 587,314 1,716,276 Channels in Straits of Mackinac, MI Completed 1991 2,832,629 237,351 Chippewa Harbor, Isle Royale, MI Completed 1959 125,629 17,555 Cross Village, MI Active 1983 364,000 0 DeTour Harbor, MI Completed 1989 2,559,346 165,068 Eagle Harbor, MI Completed 1996 205,1643 129,253 Grand Marais Harbor, MN Completed 1996 450,972 2,384,694 Grand Traverse Bay Harbor, MI Completed 1996 329,565 2,042,110 Grays Reef Passage, MI Completed 1970 190,521 826,443 La Pointe Harbor, WI Completed 1994 139,874 168,905 Les Cheneaux Island Channels, MI Completed 1980 399,478 349,691 Little Bay De Noc, Gladstone Harbor, MI Completed 1966 332,832 105,634 Lutsen Harbor, MN Active 1982 357,000 0 Mackinac Island Harbor, MI Completed 1989 334,089 1,816,577 Mackinaw City Harbor, MI Completed 1986 136,2864 116,804 Northport Harbor, WI Inactive ---- 0 0 Pensaukee Harbor, WI Completed 1996 34,035 678,757 Pine River, MI Completed 1980 13,649 95,527 St. James, Beaver Island, MI Completed 1957 49,1715 572,456 St. Joseph River, MI Completed 1975 54,555 19,185 Tawas Bay Harbor, MI Completed 1996 2,110,745 95,042 Washington Island, WI Completed 1950 62,838 106,278 Whitefish Point Harbor, MI Completed 1991 771,639 439,930 'Includes $92,774 for previous projects. 2Includes $56,500 Contributed Funds. 3Excludes $27,800 for previous projects. 4Excludes $210,500 Contributed Funds. 5Excludes $7,500 Contributed Funds. 21-94 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 30, 1998 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Kalamazoo River (Battle Creek) MI' 2 Deferred 1975 4,471,235 ---- Paw Paw Lake, MI Completed 1989 3,589,000 ---- Upper River Rouge, MI3 Inactive 1968 7,935 ---- River Rouge, MI Completed 1981 31,960,332 ---- 'Includes $108,335 Contributed Funds. 2Uncompleted portion deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with 3Planning indefinitely suspended due to lack of Section 1001 of the W.R.D.A. of 1986 (PL 99-662). local cooperation. TABLE 21-F MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER ST. MARYS RIVER, MI: EXISTING PROJECT (SEE SECTION 59 OF TEXT) Lock Davis Sabin MacArthur New Poe Miles Above Mouth 47 47 47 47 Clear Width of Chamber Feet 80 80 80 110 Length Between Gate Quoins Feet 1,350 1,350 800 1,200 Lifts Feet 21.7 21.7 21.7 21.7 Depth Over Upper Breast Walls' Feet 24.3 24.3 31 32 Depth Over Lower Breast Walls' Feet 23.1 23.1 31 32 Foundation Rock Rock Rock Rock Type of Construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Estimated Cost $6,200,0002 $3,275,0003 $12,909,440 $39,000,000 Actual Cost $2,200,0005 $1,750,0006 $12,718,8064'7 $34,813,066 Completed (Open to Commerce) Oct. 21, 1914 Sep. 18, 1919 Jul. 11, 1943 Jun. 26, 1969 Emergency Dam for South Canal North Canal Miles Above Mouth 47 47 Estimated Cost -' $300,000 Type Steel Stoplogs Recessed Steel Stoplogs Recessed Into Lock Masonry Into Lock Masonry Cost Completed -9 $169,224s Year Completed 1943 1922 (Modified 1963) 'At low water datum 600.6 above and 578.4 below. 'Includes cost of North Canal. 3Includes cost of canal excavations to provide necessary approaches to lock, canal walls, piers, and emergency dam, $662,919. 4Excludes cost of deepening and enlarging South Canal, $1,653,378. 5Excludes cost of North Canal, $2,572,611. Note: Limiting draft to locks is determined by depth over breast walls. "Excludes cost of canal excavation to provide necessary approaches to lock, canal walls, piers, and emergency dam, $662,919. 7Excluding cost of lower guard gates which were never installed. I8ncluding engineering office, and inspection. 9Not separate from cost of locks. 21-95 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 21-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Project Beaver Bay, MN 1982 Jul 1995 295,818 0 (Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act) Berrien County, MI 1963 Nov 1986 0 0 (St.Joseph Shore) beach erosion control (1958 Flood Control Act) Black River Harbor, Alcona County, MI 1971 Dec 1989 0 0 (Authorized Dec.17, 1979, under Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act) Black River Harbor, MI 1976 Nov 1977 0 0 (Aug. 30, 1935 R&H Act) Detroit River, Trenton Chnl., MI 1976 Aug 1977 0 0 (May 17, 1950 R&H Act) Detroit River, Trenton Chnl., MI 1976 Dec 1989 159,300,000 0 (Uncompleted portion) (Aug. 13, 1968 R&H Act) Duluth-Superior Inner Harbor, 1990 Dec 1989 14,562,100 0 MN and WI (Jul. 14, 1960 R&H Act) Forestville Harbor, MI 1969 Nov 1986 0 0 (1968 R&H Act) Grand Haven Harbor, MI 1976 Nov 1977 0 0 (Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act) Grand River at Grandville, MI 1966 Nov 1977 0 0 (Oct. 27, 1965 Flood Control Act) Great Lakes Connecting Channels, MI' 1990 Dec 1989 93,993,349 0 (Uncompleted portion) (R&H Acts of 1946 and 1956) Harbors of Washington Island, WI 1950 Dec 1989 62,838 0 (R&H Act of 1937) Holland Harbor Entrance Channel, MI 1962 Dec 1989 0 0 (Uncompleted portion) (Sep. 3, 1954 R&H Act) Kalamazoo River, Battle Creek, MI 1975 Dec 1989 6,656,668 108,332 (Uncompleted portion) (1954 Flood Control Act) Kalamazoo River, Kalamazoo, MI 1975 Dec 1989 416,822 0 (Jul. 3, 1958 Flood Control Act) Kenosha Harbor, WI 1990 Dec 1989 552,000 43,000 (Uncompleted portion) (Oct. 23, 1962 R&H Act) Kewaunee River, WI 1976 Aug 1977 0 0 (1960 R&H Act) 21-96 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Project Lansing (Grand River), MI 1971 Jun 1981 7,000 0 (Jul. 3, 1958 Flood Control Act) Lower Fox River, WI 1990 Dec 1989 3,753,334 0 (Uncompleted portion) (Mar. 3, 1925 R&H Act) Lutsen Harbor, MN 1990 Jul 1995 357,000 0 (Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act) Manitowoc Harbor, WI 1990 Dec 1989 0 0 (Oct. 23, 1962 R&H Act) Milwaukee Outer Harbor, WI 1990 Dec 1989 6,937,804 478,000 (Uncompleted portion) (R&H Act of 1935) Northport Harbor, WI -- Dec 1989 132,000 0 (Authorized in 1972 under Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act) Ontonagon Harbor, MI 1990 Dec 1989 27,482 0 (R&H Act of 1962) Pentwater Harbor, MI 1976 Nov 1977 0 0 (Jul. 13, 1892 R&H Act) Racine Harbor, WI 1963 May 1986 9,441,554 0 (Mar. 2, 1907; Aug. 26, 1937; and Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Acts, and Section 107 of the 1960 R&H Act) Red Run Drain, Lower Clinton River, MI 1983 Nov 1986 3,823,000 0 (1970 Flood Control Act) Rogers City Harbor, MI 1926 Aug 1977 5,892 0 (Jun. 25, 1910 R&H Act) Rouge River, MI 1976 Aug 1977 22,000 0 (Oct 23, 1962 R&H Act) Rouge River, MI 1976 Aug 1977 12,000 0 (Jul. 3, 1958 R&H Act) Rouge River, MI 1976 Aug 1977 0 0 (Aug. 30, 1935 R&H Act) Saginaw River, MI 1983 May 1997 5,125,000 1,611,500 (Midland on Tittabawassee River) St. Clair River Compensating Works, MI 1976 Aug 1977 0 0 (Jul. 3, 1930 R&H Act) South Milwaukee Harbor, WI 1906 Aug 1977 0 0 (1836 Flood Control Act) 21-97 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 21-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Project St. Marys River (MacArthur Lock Guard Gates), MI (Mar. 7, 1942 R&H Act) Two Rivers Harbor, WI (Uncompleted portion) (Aug. 30, 1935 R&H Act) 'Includes Detroit and St. Clair Rivers. 1977 1990 Oct 1978 Dec 1989 147,463 21-98 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-H FEATURES OF EXISTING PROJECT Length Miles Upbound Project Name of Channel of from or Down- Project Project Datum Year Channel River bound Width Depth Planes Corn- (Feet) Mouth Vessels (Feet) (Feet) IGLD 1985 plete (Feet) DETROIT RIVER, MI (SEE SECTION 12 OF TEXT) 2 38,800 44,500 Channel north of Belle Isle' Channel at head of Detroit River Misc. shoals and obstructions Belle Isle to Fighting Island Channel Fighting Island Channel Ballards Reef Channel north of junction with Livingstone Channel Livingstone Channel Upper Livingstone Channel Lower: CS 260+00 to 368+87 CS 368+87 to 492+00 East Outer Channel Misc. shoals and obstructions, Detroit River to Pelee Passage Pelee Passage Shoal Amherstberg Channel: Upper Section, Ballards Reef Channel Middle Section Lower Section, Hackett Range West Outer Channel Trenton Channel: Wyandotte Reach Trenton Channel (Upper) Trenton Reach (Lower) Grosse Ile Shoal 30 32 25 Both 200 Both 800 Both --- 24,800 17 Both 800 12,200 12 Both 600 26,000 10 Down 450 10,887 12,313 42,000 5 --- --- 21.0 28.5 28.5 28.5 28.5 27.7 571.9 572.1-571.5 571.5-570.9 570.4 570.4 570.4-569.2 1964 Down 450-800 29.0 569.2 Both 800-1,200 29.0 569.2 Both 1,200 28.5 569.2 Both --- 28.5-29.53 569.2 --- --- Both --- 6,500 12,000 24,000 21,000 31,500 5,100 600 600 10 17 14 Up 600 Up 600 Up 600 Down 800 Local 300 Local 300 Local 250-300 Local --- 29.5 27.5 21-27.54 21-28.55 22.0 27.0 28.0 28.0 20.0 569.2 570.4-570.1 570.1-569.5 569.5-569.2 569.2 570.3-570.2 570.2-569.4 570.4 ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI (SEE SECTION 57 OF TEXT) Channel at foot of Lake Huron Channel north of Blue Water Bridge Port Huron to Stag Island: Widening at Upper and Lower Ends of Stag Island St. Clair to Russell Island Russell Island to Southeast Bend Southeast Bend: CS 324+00 to 250+00 Cutoff Channel North Channel Outlet 26,500 44 4,100 39 38,000 38 37,600 31 77,000 24 20,600 11 7,400 5 30,300 --- 8,000 --- Both 800 Both 800 30.0 30.0 Both 1,000- 27.4 Both 1,400 27.3 Both 900-1,000 27.3 Both 1,000 27.2 700-1,000 Both 27.1 Both 700 27.1 Small 700 10.0 Craft 100 577.5-577.1 1961 577.1-576.5 1962 577.1-575.3 575.3-574.3 574.3-572.6 572.6-572.3 572.3-572.2 572.2 572.2 1961 1962 1962 1962 1962 1962 --- 'This is a side channel. 2Extends from deep water near Windmill Point to a point opposite Fairview Slip, about 3,000 feet. 'Project depth 29.5 feet over Rock Shoals and 28.5 feet over other than Rock Shoals. 4Project depth 21 feet in easterly 300-foot width of channel and 27.5 feet in westerly 300-foot width. SProject depth 21 feet in easterly 300-foot width of channel and 28.5 feet in westerly 300-foot width. 6Project complete except for work authorized by Rivers and Harbors Act of 1950. 21-99 1964 1964 1964 1962 1964 1961 1961 1964 1964 1960 1960 1960 1929 19646 1964 1941 1904 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 21-I FOX RIVER, WI: LOCKS AND DAMS (SEE SECTION 14 OF TEXT) Depth at Normal Pool Miles Avail- Lower from Dis- Clear able Breast Miter Year Green Nearest tance Width Length Lift Wall' Sill Character of Kind of Type of Com- Actual Name of Lock and Dam Bay Town (miles) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Foundation Dam Construction plete DePere lock2 7.1 DePere --- 36.0 146.0 8.9 10.3 12.0 Rock --- Concrete 1936 $229 DePere dam' 7.2 DePere --- --- --- --- --- --- Rock Fixed3 Concrete 1929 209, Little Kaukauna lock 13.0 DePere 6 36.0 146.0 7.2 8.0 9.5 Clay -- Concrete 1938 362, Little Kaukauna dam2 13.1 DePere 6 --- --- --- --- --- Clay and gravel Fixed3'4 Piers and concrete 1926 179, Rapide Croche lock2 19.2 Wrightstown 2 36.0 146.0 8.3 8.8 9.3 Rock -- Concrete 1934 228, Rapide Croche dam- 19.3 Wrightstown 2 --- --- --- --- --- Rock Fixed 4 Concrete 1930 118, Kaukauna fifth lock= 22.8 Kaukauna --- 35.6 144.0 9.1 6.7 9.3 Rock --- Composite 1898 13,3 Kaukauna fourth lock2 23.1 Kaukauna --- 36.6 144.1 10.2 6.9 6.0 Rock --- Stone masonry 1879 37, Kaukauna third lock2 23.3 Kaukauna --- 30.6 144.0 10.2 6.9 6.3 Rock --- Stone masonry 1879 39, Kaukauna second lock2 23.4 Kaukauna --- 35.0 144.0 9.6 6.0 6.0 Rock --- Stone masonry 1903 24, Kaukauna first lock' 23.6 Kaukauna --- 35.1 144.4 11.0 6.9 6.0 Rock --- Stone masonry 1883 38, Kaukauna dam' 24.0 Kaukauna --- --- --- --- --- --- Rock Fixed3 4 Concrete 1931 123, Kaukauna guard lock 24.0 Kaukauna --- 40.0 --- --- 9.4 --- Rock -- Stone masonry 1891 12, Little Chute combined lock: Lower Upper Little Chute second lock' Luttle Chute first (guard) lock' Little Chute dam' Cedars lock' Cedars dam3 Appleton fourth lock' Appleton lower dam' Appleton third lock' Appleton second lock'- Appelton first lock' Appleton upper dam Menasha lock 2 Menasha dam, 24.4 Little Chute 1 35.4 146.5 10.9 6.0 8.6 Rock 25.4 Little Chute 1 36.3 144.1 10.6 7.6 6.0 Hardpan 26.4 Little Chute --- 35.0 144.2 13.8 8.0 6.1 Rock 26.5 Little Chute --- 35.4 --- --- 6.6 --- Rock 26.6 Little Chute --- --- --- --- --- --- Rock 27.3 Little Chute 1 35.0 144.0 9.8 6.8 7.3 Rock 27.4 Little Chute 1 -- --- --- --- --- Rock 30.7 Appelton 1 35.0 144.0 7.6 8.1 7.9 Rock 30.9 Appleton I --- --- --- --- --- Rock 31.3 Appleton --- 35.0 144.0 8.7 6.0 8.6 Rock 31.6 Appleton --- 35.1 144.6 9.6 6.9 6.0 Clay 31.9 Appleton --- 35.0 144.7 10.0 6.6 6.0 Rock 32.2 Appleton --- -- -- --- --- --- Rock 37.0 Menasha --- 35.4 144.0 8.5 7.2 8.0 Clay 37.8 Menasha --- -- --- --- --- --- Hardpan --- Stonemasonry 1879 --- Stonemasonry 1879 --- Stone masonry 1881 --- Stone masonry 1904 Fixed3 4 Concrete 1932 --- Stonemasonry 1888 Fixed3 4 Concrete 1933 --- Stone masonry 1907 Fixed3 4 Concrete 1934 --- Stone masonry 1900 --- Stone masonry 1901 --- Stone masonry 1884 Fixed3' Concrete 1940 --- Composite 1899 Fixed3 Concrete 1937 Cost 308 536 427 398 738 975 3105 536 948 313 704 763 630 102,304 48,555 7,817 s 82,554 34,972 84,973 40,893 73,903 32,238 22,940 36,004 151,558 19,326 s 84.686 'Depth shown is on breast wall, which is controlling depth for upper pool. Original structure built prior to assumption of control by United States on Sep. 18, 1872. 3Provided with sluices. 4Flash boards used. SPartially rebuilt. 21-100 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-J Name of Project RECONNAISSANCE & CONDITION SURVEYS Date Survey Conducted ALGOMA HARBOR, WI BAYFIELD HARBOR, WI BIG BAY HARBOR, MI BIG SUAMICO RIVER, WI DETOUR HARBOR, MI EAGLE HARBOR, MI GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MN LA POINTE HARBOR, WI MACKINAW CITY HARBOR, MI PENSAUKEE HARBOR, WI TAWAS BAY HARBOR, MI WASHINGTON ISLAND, WI WHITEFISH POINT HARBOR, MI SEPTEMBER 1998 AUGUST 1998 AUGUST 1998 JULY 1998 AUGUST 1998 JUNE 1998 MAY 1998 AUGUST 1998 JULY 1998 AUGUST 1998 SEPTEMBER 1998 SEPTEMBER 1998 AUGUST 1998 21-101 . _ CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT () CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT The district comprises Cook, McHenry, Lake, Kane, DuPage, and Will Counties in Illinois, and Lake and Porter Counties in Indiana, and a portion of La Porte County along Lake Michigan in Indiana. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Burns Waterway Harbor, IN 2. Burns Waterway SBH, IN 3. Burns Waterway Harbor (Major Rehab), IN 4. Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN 5. Chicago Harbor, IL 6. Chicago River, IL 7. Indiana Harbor, IN 8. Lake Michigan Diversion 9. Michigan City Harbor, IN 10. Waukegan Harbor, IL 11. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys 12. National Emergency Preparedness Alterations of Bridges 13. Other Authorized Bridge Alterations Beach Erosion Control 14. Casino Beach, IL 15. Chicago Shoreline, IL 16. Illinois Beach State Park, IL 17. Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore Bank Protection, Beverly Shores, IN 18. Indiana Shoreline Erosion, IN 19. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects 20. Beach Erosion Control Under Special Authorization Flood Control 21. Chicago River, IL (North Branch) 22. Lake George, Hobart, IN 23. Little Calumet River, IN 24. Little Calumet River Basin, Cady Marsh Ditch, IN 25. McCook and Thornton Reservoirs, IL 26. North Branch, Chicago River, IL 27. O'Hare Reservoir, IL 28. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 29. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization Page 22-3 22-3 22-4 22-4 22-4 22-5 22-6 22-6 22-7 22-7 22-8 22-8 22-8 22-8 22-8 22-9 22-9 22-10 22-10 22-10 22-10 22-11 22-11 22-12 22-12 22-12 22-13 22-14 22-14 General Investigations 30. Surveys 31. Collection and Study of Basic Data 22-1 Page 22-14 22-14 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLES Table Title Number Cost and Financial Statement Authorization Legislation Existing Projects Other Authorized Bridge Alterations Other Authorized Beach Erosion Projects Other Authorized Flood Control Projects Deauthorized Projects 22-A 22-B 22-C 22-D 22-E 22-F 22-G Pages 22-15 thru-18 22-19 thru 23 22-24 thru 25 22-26 22-26 22-26 22-27 22-2 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT Navigation 1. BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana on the southern shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, 28 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14905 and 14926.) Previous Projects. None. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a rubblemound north breakwater 4,630 feet long and a rubblemound breakwater west arm 1,200 feet long, for a total breakwater length of 5,830 feet; (b) an approach channel 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide; (c) an outer harbor 28 feet deep; (d) an east harbor arm 27 feet deep and 620 feet wide; and (e) a west harbor arm 27 feet deep and 620 feet wide. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of October 27, 1965 (Public Law 89-298; House Document Number 160, 88th Congress, 1st Session). The authorizing act also provided the Secretary of the Army with the authority to reimburse the State of Indiana for expenditure of funds used to construct such portions of the project as approved by the Chief of Engineers and constructed under the supervision of the Chief of Engineers (See tables 22-B,C). Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Eleven berths are available at the facilities owned and administered by the Indiana Port Commission. One berth, committed to grain, is located on the outer harbor. Four berths on the East Harbor Arm are dedicated to handling dry and liquid bulk commodities. The East Harbor Arm also includes a small-boat harbor designed to accommodate working tugs for vessel assistance and barge movement. On the West Arm there are six berths. Although one berth is available for dry bulk cargoes, these berths are primarily used for the shipment and receipt of general cargo. Additionally, the Indiana Port Commission, through a lease, administers the west side of the West Harbor Arm for barge fleeting. The remaining available harbor berthing on the east side of the East Harbor Arm is privately owned. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Sediment surveys and studies were performed at a cost of $24,151, including costs of monitoring beach nourishment dredging disposal site. Breakwater maintenance costs were $46,183 for hired labor, $221,176 by other Corps of Engineers, and $40,785 by contract. Engineering and design costs were $4,585. Channel maintenance dredging was completed at a cost of $13,974 by contract. Project administration and real estate costs were $49,914 and $2,596, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing project is complete. Total costs to September 30, 1998 were $25,055,340 of which $13,599,900 was for new work ($13,584,000 federal and $15,900 nonfederal) and $11,455,440 ($11,347,078 federal and $108,362 non-federal) for was maintenance. 2. BURNS WATERWAY SBH, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana on the southeast shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, at the mouth of the Burns Waterway, approximately 27 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14905 and 14926.) Previous Projects. None Existing Project. Provides for (a) a rubblemound west breakwater 1,043 feet long; (b) a rubblemound north breakwater 678 feet long; and (c) channel improvements of 5,200 linear feet with 145,000 cubic yards of dredged material used for beach nourishment (See table 22-C). Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are several marinas located along Burns Waterway and Burns Ditch. The principal marina, which is owned and operated jointly by the City of Portage and the Little Calumet River Basin Commission, was built in 1996 to comply with the local cooperation agreement. The commodities handled at this harbor are fresh fish caught as a result of charter boat fishing. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Project management costs were $7,176. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1998 were $5,047,493 of which $3,770,558 was for new work ($2,000,000 federal and $1,770,558 non-federal), and $1,276,935 for maintenance (federal). 22-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 3. BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR (MAJOR REHAB), IN Location. The project is located in northwestern Indiana on the southern shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County. Existing Project. The rehabilitation project consists of constructing a segmented reef breakwater system, 75 feet lakeward of the northern section of the existing rubblemound breakwater. The project provides for seven reef segments, one 1,575 feet long and six 375 feet long with 25 feet spacing between segments Local Cooperation. None required. Operations and Results During the Period. New Work: Construction was completed at a cost of $3,835,044. Engineering and design costs were $12,171. The construction management costs were $101,712. Condition at the End of Fiscal Year. Work on the construction contract was completed. The total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1998 was $13,376,736. 4. CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL and IN Location. Northeastern Illinois, on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Cook County, 15 miles south of Chicago Harbor, within the corporate limits of the City of Chicago, except for breakwaters, and approach channel and an anchorage area which are in Indiana. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926 and 14929.) Previous Projects. For details see page 1400 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a stone-filled timber crib breakwater 6,714 feet long; (b) a stonefilled double-row steel sheet pile detached breakwater 5,007 feet long; (c) an approach channel 29 feet deep and 3,200 feet wide; (d) an outer harbor anchorage area 28 feet deep and 3,000 feet wide; (e) an entrance channel 27 feet deep and 230 to 290 feet wide; (f) a channel in the Calumet River 27 feet deep and at least 200 feet wide to the north side of 130th Street; (g) three turning basins designated as numbers, 1, 3, and 5; and (h) a channel extending into Lake Calumet at a width of about 1,000 feet. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of March 3, 1899, June 13, 1902, August 30, 1935, July 14, 1960, October 23, 1962, and October 27, 1965 (See tables 22-B,C). Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Thirty six docks, wharves, and terminals are available. The Illinois International Port District owns four wharves, two grain elevators, one dock, and one terminal. The United States Government owns one stone dock. The most important cargoes handled are general cargo, grain, iron ore and concentrates, coal, and cement. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Repair of the garage was continued at a cost of $18,166 by hired labor and $2,557 by contract. Sediment surveys and studies were performed by hired labor at a cost of $11,856. Environmental dredging studies and environmental compliance inspections were conducted at costs of $12,505 by contract and $2,263 by hired labor respectively. Confined Disposal Facility (CDF) water quality monitoring was continued at a cost of $101,573. CDF maintenance costs were $10,657 for hired labor and $331,361 by other Corps of Engineers. Costs for routine operation of the CDF were $9,166 for hired labor and $5,175 by other Corps of Engineers. Costs for breakwater maintenance were $22,193 for hired labor, $18,795 by contract, and $4,683 for engineering and design. Dredging costs were $224,555 by contract and supervision and administration costs were $11,141. Project management and real estate costs were $77,681 and $3,322, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing project is 100 percent complete. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1998, were $62,359,944 of which $22,578,567 was for new work ($19,541,964 federal funds and $3,036,603 public works funds), $34,353,376 for maintenance ($33,516,709 federal and $836,667 non-federal funds) and $5,428,001 federal funds for rehabilitation. 5. CHICAGO HARBOR, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Cook County, within the corporate limits of the City of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926, 14927, and 14928.) Previous Projects. See page 1396 of Annual Report for 1962. 22-4 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT Existing Project. Provides for (a) a stone-filled timber crib shore and extension breakwater 2,250 feet long; (b) a stone-filled timber crib exterior breakwater 5,421 feet long; (c) a rubblemound and stone-filled concrete caisson southerly extension to the exterior breakwater 4,944 feet long, exclusive of a 582-foot entrance gap enclosing an outer basin of about 970 acres; (d) a stone-filled timber crib north pier 960 feet long; (e) a stone-filled timber crib north inner breakwater 4,034 feet long with a 304-foot shore return and a 754-foot gap; (f) a stone-filled timber crib south inner breakwater 2,544 feet long, enclosing an inner basin of approximately 224 acres; (g) a lake approach channel 29 feet deep and 800 feet wide; (h) a channel and maneuver area inside the exterior breakwater and southerly extension breakwater 28 feet deep with a maximum width of 1,300 feet; (i) an entrance channel 21 feet deep and (j) the Chicago Harbor Lock. The Chicago Lock was constructed in 1938 by the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago. The deepdraft lock is 600 feet long, 80 feet wide, and 23 feet deep over the sill and is of steel cellular design. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of July 11, 1870, June 14, 1880, March 3, 1899, July 25, 1912, March 2, 1919 and October 23, 1962 (See table 22-B). Operation and maintenance responsibilities in the interest of navigation were transferred to the Federal Government pursuant to Public Law 98-63 approved July 30, 1983; Section 107 of the Public 97-88; and the Memorandum of Agreement between the Department of Army and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are five docks with 18 berths for passenger excursion boats and 10 berths for visiting large vessels. The most important cargoes handled through the lock are petroleum products, in addition to sugar and non-metallic minerals. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Formal periodic inspections of the lock were conducted at a cost of $163,381 for hired labor and other in-house resources. Project condition surveys were performed by hired labor for $24,254 and by contract for $20,484. The lock was operated by contract at a cost of $788,899. Other costs associated with the lock operation were $217,634. Operation of the lock property costs were $45,853 by hired labor, $6,551 by contract and $37,029 by other Corps of Engineers. Lock maintenance costs include gate parts fabrication, track milling, hinge and seal replacement and lifting beam replacement were $167,250 for hired labor and in-house resources, $389,141 by contract, $622,599 by other government agencies and $831,139 by other Corps of Engineers. Engineering and design costs for the above were $19,873 by hired labor and $374,391 by other Corps of Engineers. Supervision and administration costs were $48,441. Breakwater maintenance costs were $10,252 for hired labor, $108,870 by other Corps of Engineers and $130,270 by contract. Continuing data evaluation of the wave gage was performed at $10,266 hired labor and $88,422 by other Corps of Engineers. Work on the lock major rehabilitation report was performed at $246,992 by hired labor and $74,123 by other Corps of Engineers. Project management and real estate costs were $76,745 and $9,221, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing project is complete. Total costs to September 30, 1998 were $46,327,329 of which $4,788,827 was for new work, $40,051,902 was for maintenance, $1,326,600 for rehabilitation and $160,000 Harbor and Dams funds. 6. CHICAGO RIVER, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois, in Cook County within the corporate limits of the City of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926, 14927 and 14928.) Previous Projects. See page 1394 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a channel 21 feet deep in the main river from its mouth at Rush Street to the junction of the North and South Branches (0.7 miles); (b) a channel 21 feet deep in the North Branch from the junction to North Avenue (2.22 miles); (c) a channel 21 feet deep on the North Branch Canal (1.04 miles); (d) a 21-foot deep North Branch Turning Basin just south of North Avenue; and (e) a channel 9 feet deep in the North Branch from North Avenue to Addison Street (authorized but not constructed). The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of March 3, 1899, June 13, 1902, March 2, 1907, and July 24, 1946 (See tables 22-B, C). The portion of the project authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1946 is presently being restudied to confirm economic feasibility. 22-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed modifications. The River and Harbor Act of July 24, 1946, which provided for the improvement of the channel, is subject to the condition that local interests furnish assurances that they will hold the United States government free from damages which may result from construction and maintenance of the improvement. Requirement has not been complied with. Terminal Facilities. Six docks are available. The most important cargoes handled are sand, gravel and crushed rock, non-metallic minerals and scrap iron. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Sediment surveys and other studies were performed by hired labor at a cost of $15,798. Water control activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of $123,253, by other Corps of Engineers at a cost $746 and by other federal agency at a cost of $158,113. Program management cost was $622. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The project is complete except for dredging the channel between North Avenue and Addison Street as authorized by the 1946 River Harbor Act. Channel maintenance for the reach from Clark Street to head of navigation has been deferred pending location and approval of suitable dredged material disposal site. Head of navigation for deep-draft vessels is North Avenue, 5.97 miles from the Michigan Avenue bridge. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1998 were $17,289,395 of which $1,500,565 was for new work and $15,788,830 was for maintenance. 7. INDIANA HARBOR, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Lake County, 19 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926 and 14929.) Previous Projects. For details see page 1943 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1520 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a northerly rubblemound breakwater 1,120 feet long; (b) an easterly concrete capped caisson breakwater 201 feet long with a rubblemound extension 2,324 feet long; (c) a lake approach channel 29 feet deep and 800 feet wide; (d) an anchorage and maneuver basin 28 feet deep; (e) a main canal entrance channel 27 feet deep and 280 feet wide; (f) a main canal 22 feet deep; (g) a turning basin 22 feet deep; (h) the Forks Turning Basin 22 feet deep; (i) the Lake George Branch 22 feet deep; and (j) the Calumet River Branch 22 feet deep. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of March 4, 1913, March 2, 1919, March 20, 1922, July 3, 1930, August 30, 1935, August 28, 1937, and July 14, 1960 (See tables 22-B, C). Local Cooperation. Substantially complied with. See FY 1986 Annual Report for full requirements. Terminal Facilities. Fifteen docks and wharves are available. Six docks handle iron ore and limestone. Six docks are for handling petroleum products and three docks for handling gypsum, scrap metal and steel, and bulk products. However, not all docks are presently being used for the shipment or receipt of waterborne commodities. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Environmental studies were performed by hired labor at a cost of $3,124, and by other federal agency for $2,501, and sediment surveys costs were $183,462. Engineering and design costs of Confined Disposal Facility were $224,275 for hired labor, $27,513 by other Corps of Engineers, $906 by other federal agency, and $305,863 by contract. Program management and real estate costs were $14,136 and $531, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal year. The existing project is complete. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1998 were $18,465,889 of which $4,909,648 ($4,897,148 federal and $12,500 nonfederal contributed funds) was for new work and $13,556,241 was for maintenance. Channel maintenance has been deferred pending location and construction of suitable Confined Disposal Facility. 8. LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSION Location. Northeastern Illinois on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Cook County, within the corporate limits of the City of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926, 14927, and 14928.) Previous Projects. See page 22-3 of Annual Report for 1988. Operations and Results During Period. Operations: Water accounting studies and preparation of reports were performed at costs of $350,549 by hired labor, $154,874 by other federal agency, and $195,376 by AE contract. 22-6 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1998 was $3,784,541. 9. MICHIGAN CITY HARBOR, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southeast shore of Lake Michigan in La Porte County, 38 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14905 and 14926.) Previous Projects. See page 1407 of Annual Report for 1992. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a stone-filled timber crib detached breakwater 1,304 feet long; (b) a pile and steel sheeting west pier 835 feet long; (c) a stone-filled timber crib, pile and steel sheeting east pier 2,276 feet long; (d) a stone-filled timber crib east breakwater 1,000 feet long; (e) an entrance channel 18 feet deep and 425 feet wide; (f) a turning basin No. 1, 18 feet deep; (g) a channel in Trail Creek 18 feet deep; (h) an outer basin 12 feet deep in the northerly portion and 8 feet deep in the southerly portion; and (i) a channel in Trail Creek 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from turning basin No. 2 to the E Street bridge. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of March 3, 1899, March 3, 1905, January 21, 1927, August 30, 1935, and Section 107 of July 14, 1960, River and Harbor Acts, September 30, 1966 (See tables 22-B, C). Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are several marinas in the lower mile of Trail Creek. The commodity handled at this harbor is fresh fish. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Sediment surveys and studies were continued by hired labor at a cost of $914. Breakwater maintenance was performed at a cost of $101,191, engineering and design costs were $11,375. Confined Disposal Facility maintenance costs were $15,877. Program management and real estate costs were $6,975 and $397, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total costs of existing project to September 30 1998 were $15,140,340, of which $1,574,158 was for new work ($1,543,646 federal and $30,512 non-federal funds), $11,947,512 for maintenance ($11,892,512 federal and $55,000 non-federal) and $1,618,670 for rehabilitation (federal funds). 10. WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois on the west shore of Lake Michigan in Lake County, 38 miles north of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14904 and 14905.) Previous Projects. See page 1392 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a northerly stone-filled timber crib breakwater 588 feet long; (b) a stone-filled reinforced concrete caisson shore connection 270 feet long; (c) a stone-filled doublerow steel sheeting shore connection 640 feet long; (d) a single-row steel sheeting shore connection 398 feet long; (e) a stone-filled timber crib north pier 998 feet long; (f) a single-row steel sheet piling north pier 444 feet long; (g) a steel piling revetment 632 feet long; (h) a stone-filled timber crib pier 1,399 feet long; (i) a stone-filled double-row pile and sheeting south pier 1,712 feet long; (j) an entrance channel 22 feet deep and 390 feet wide; (k) a channel between the piers 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide; (1) an inner basin 18 feet deep; and (m) an anchorage area in the southwest corner of the inner basin 8 feet deep. An authorized, but as yet unconstructed project modification provides for (a) an entrance channel 27 feet deep, (b) a channel between the piers 23 feet deep and (c) an inner basin and channel extension 23 feet deep. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of June 3, 1902, July 13, 1930, and March 2, 1945, and on December 17,1970 by delegated authority under Section 201 of the Rivers and Harbor Act of October 27, 1965. (See tables 22-B, C). The portion of the project authorized by the 1970 modification is being restudied to confirm economic feasiblity. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portions. The Dec. 17, 1970 modification, which provides for modifications to the channel, is subject to the conditions that local interests furnish assurances that they will hold the United States government free from damages from construction and maintenance of the improvement and that certain lands, easements and rights-of-way be provided. Terminal Facilities. Four docks are available. The commodities handled at this harbor are gypsum and building cement. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Sediment surveys and environmental studies were performed at costs of $351,520 and 22-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 $44,636 respectively. Plans and specifications for dredging the outer harbor were performed by hired labor at a cost of $90,278. Dredging was performed at a contract cost of $137,662 and supervision and administration costs were $30,296. Breakwater maintenance costs were $753. Project management and real estate costs were $50,683 and $1,945, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing project is complete except for the 1970 modification, which is,being restudied. Maintenance of the channel between the pier to the head of navigation has been deferred pending location, approval and probable construction of a suitable dredged material disposal site. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1998 were $15,381,327 of which $823,026 was for new work and $14,558,301 was for maintenance. 11. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Condition surveys were performed at a cost of $106,765. 12. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Fiscal Year 1998 costs for management and mobilization planning were $35,354. Alteration of Bridges 13. OTHER AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATIONS See table 22-D. Beach Erosion Control 14. CASINO BEACH, IL Location. Casino Beach is located along the Lake Michigan shoreline at Jackson Park in Chicago, Illinois. Existing Project. The Casino Beach project was authorized by Section 501 (a) of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. The project consists of rehabilitating 1,800 feet of the Casino jetty by encasing the existing timber pile and stone structure in steel sheet piling and a concrete cap. Local Cooperation. The local project sponsor is the Chicago Park District. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights-ofway; complete all necessary relocations; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction or operation of the project; operate and maintain the completed project; and make cash contribution toward the cost of construction. Operations and Results During Period. New Work: Construction activities were completed for the remaining 800 feet of the breakwater by the local sponsor. Construction costs were -$27,510 (- $166,208 federal and $138,698 non-federal). Real estate management costs were $5,758 (federal). Engineering and design was performed by hired labor at a cost of $18,226 ($5,343 federal and $12,883 non-federal). Construction management costs were $67,878 ($10,379 federal and $57,499 non-federal). An ADR ruling resulted in a payment of $656,487 ($323,092 federal and $333,395 non-federal) to the contractor. The federal portion of the payment was financed by the Department of Justice Judgement Fund and therefore is shown as unfunded costs on the Corps' books. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction was completed. The total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1998 was $4,631,504 of which is $2,465,517 federal and $2,165,987 non-federal. 15. CHICAGO SHORELINE, IL Location. The project area includes 24 miles of publicly owned shoreline along Lake Michigan in Chicago, Illinois. Existing Project. The Chicago Shoreline project is not authorized. The Federally supportable plan consists of constructing rubblemound revetments along 16,500 and 21,500 feet of the shoreline in the Lincoln Park and Burnham Park areas, respectively. Other project features include: revetments near the Adler Planetarium and at Meigs Field; a low concrete floodwall with detachable flashboards along Lake Shore Drive in the Oak Street Beach area; a breakwater to protect the South Filtration Plant near 78th Street; and nourishment of a short reach of shoreline near Fullerton Avenue and 31st Street. The estimated fully funded project cost for this plan (1998) is $292,100,000. The local sponsor prefers to substitute steel sheet pile step stone revetments for the rubblemound revetments in the Lincoln and Burnham Park areas. They have agreed to pay the increased cost above the federally supportable plan. 22-8 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT Local Cooperation. By letters dated February 2, 1993 and March 1, 1993, the Chicago Park District and the City of Chicago, respectively indicated their willingness to be the local project sponsors. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; complete all necessary relocations; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction or operation of the project; operate and maintain the completed project; and make cash contribution toward the cost of construction. The Project Cooperation Agreement for Reach 5, South Water Purification Plant, was executed in August 1998. Operations and Results During Period. New Work: Construction on Reach 5, South Water Purification Plant breakwater, was continued and Solidarity Drive construction was completed by the local sponsor. Construction was initiated by the local sponsor under Section 215 in Reaches 2 and 4. Reach 4 construction was initiated by the Corps in August 1998 from 31s t to 3 3 rd Streets. A total of $4,700,046 was spent for construction; $143,281 was expended for construction management. Engineering and design costs of $2,428,322 were expended on Reaches 2 and 4, including $479,806 for A-E contracts and $15,172 for work by other Corps of Engineers and $1,933,344 by hired labor; and real estate costs were $13,638. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction was initiated initiated in Reaches 2 and 4, continued in Reach 5 and completed in Reach 3 and engineering and design was continued in Reaches 2 and 4. The total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1998 was $12,838,980. 16. ILLINOIS BEACH STATE PARK, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois on the west shore of Lake Michigan along the 9-mile reach of shoreline immediately south of the Illinois-Wisconsin State line. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14901 and 14904.) Previous Projects. None. Existing Project. Provides for (a) construction of 46 rubblemound, offshore breakwaters approximately 150 feet long and spaced about 300 feet apart; (b) initial beach nourishment consisting of placement of 100,000 cubic yards of coarse graded beach material; and (c) periodic renourishment of 100,000 cubic yards approximately every five years. The project was conditionally authorized in Section 501 (b) of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act subject to a report by the Corps of Engineers and approval by the Secretary of the Army. A Feasibility Review Conference was held in April 1991. As a result, the District Engineer was directed to terminate work on this project and to submit a letter report to the Congress summarizing the feasibility study and the results of the Washington level review. Work on the feasibility report was resumed in FY 1994 as directed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works in response to a letter from Congressman John Porter, 10th Congressional District of Illinois. Local Cooperation. The local project sponsor would be required to provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; accomplish all required relocations; hold and save the United State free from damages; and provide a cash contribution. Operations and Results During Period. No work effort was accomplished on this project due to lack of funding. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1998 was $11,908. 17. INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE BANK PROTECTION, BEVERLY SHORES, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southeast shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, about 35 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14095 and 14926.) Existing Project. Provides for placement of 13,000 feet of stone revetment and periodic repair of riprap to maintain the full length of Lake Front Drive in Beverly Shores, Indiana. The current project was authorized by Public Laws 97-88 and 98-63. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Project lands are held by the National Park Service. Operations and Results During Period. Revetment maintenance was performed at a cost of $100,000 by contract and $51,904 hired labor. Engineering and design costs were $204,622; supervision and administration costs were $35,395. Project management and real estate costs were $32,938 and $10,376 respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1998 were 22-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 $1,691,235 of which $660,000 was for new work and $1,031,235 was for maintenance. 18. INDIANA SHORELINE EROSION, IN Location. On the south end of Lake Michigan along a two-mile reach of shore west of Michigan City Harbor, Indiana. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14095 and 14926.) Existing Project. The project consists of beach nourishment along approximately two miles of beach between Michigan City Harbor and Beverly Shores, Indiana, requiring an initial placement of 264,500 cubic yards of sand. Periodic replenishment of about 264,500 cubic yards of sand at five year intervals would be required throughout the life of the project. The project was authorized for construction by Section 501 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Estimated federal cost (1997) for new work is $184,000,000, including future beach. nourishment. Local Cooperation. None required. Operations and Results During Period. New Work: The first construction contract for the initial placement was completed. The construction cost was $1,513,027 in FY 97. The second construction contract placed 50,000 cubic yards at a construction cost of $2,93 1,300. Engineering and design was performed by hired labor at a cost of $155,841 and by other Corps of Engineers at a cost of $3,500. Construction management costs were $89,080. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction was initiated. The total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1998 is $5,807,324. 19. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS See table 22-E. 20. BEACH EROSION CONTROL UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section r)3 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1962, as amended. None. Flood Control 21. CHICAGO RIVER, IL (NORTH BRANCH) Location. Northern Illinois, in Cook and Lake Counties. Existing Project. Provides for clearing the channel of the North Branch of the Chicago River of fallen trees, roots, and other debris and objects which contribute to the flooding, unsightliness, and pollution of the river. The project extends from Wolf Point in Chicago, Illinois, to its source just south of Rockland Road east of Libertyville, Illinois. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of December 31, 1970 (Section 116) and amended by the River and Harbor Act of March 7, 1974 and the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local Cooperation. The 1970 Act provided that local interests furnish without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and disposal areas necessary for construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction; maintain and operate all works after completion without cost to the United States; and agree to bear all costs in excess of $200,000 for completing construction. The 1974 Act provided that the United States will maintain the channel free of trees, roots, debris and objects at a cost not to exceed $150,000 per year with non-federal interests paying 25 percent of the cost of maintenance. The 1986 Water Resources Development Act changed the cost sharing to require that non-federal interests pay 50 percent of the cost of maintenance plus the cost of disposal. The requirements are fully complied with. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Sediment surveys were performed by hired labor at a cost of $4,060. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1998 was $4,444,644 of which $231,884 was for new work ($191,884 federal funds and $40,000 contributed funds), and $4,212,760 was for maintenance ($2,611,329 federal funds and $1,601,431 nonfederal contributed funds). 22-10 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT 22. LAKE GEORGE, HOBART, IN Location. Lake George in Hobart, Indiana and Deep River watershed upstream of the lake through Lake Station, Indiana. Existing Project. The project consists of the removal of silt, aquatic growth and other material and the construction of silt traps or other devices to prevent and abate the deposition of sediment. Project was authorized by Section 602 of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986. Local Cooperation. Section 602(b), Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. By letter dated March 9, 1987 the City of Hobart, Indiana indicated that it was a potential local project sponsor and applied for credit for previous work applicable to the project under the provisions of Section 104 (d) of the 1986 WRDA. Operations and Results During Period. New Work: Preconstruction engineering and design was continued by hired labor at a cost of $229,530 and by A-E at a cost of $25,173. Construction funds in the amount of $3,500,000 were appropriated but the President invoked the line item veto for this project in the Appropriations bill.. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Preconstruction engineering and design is in progress. Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1998 is $1,249,565. 23. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IN Location. The Little Calumet River project is located in northwest Indiana between the Illinois- Indiana State line and the Conrail Railroad in east Gary, Indiana. Existing Project. The project consists of replacing 9.5 miles of existing spoil bank levees with 12.2 miles of new levees, floodwalls, closure and appurtenant structures between the Illinois-Indiana State line and Cline Avenue; construction of 9.7 miles of set-back levees in Gary; a diversion structure at Hart Ditch; permanent evacuation of 29 structures in the Black Oak area of Gary; flood proofing 38 residential structures in Gary; modifying 7 miles of channel and 3 accompanying bridge culvert modifications; modifying one highway bridge; construction of 16.8 miles of hiking trails and accompanying recreation support facilities; and preservation of 788 acres of wetlands with wildlife mitigation measures. Estimated federal cost (1998) for new work is $179,000,000; $131,000,000 federal and $48,000,000 is to be contributed by local interests. The project was authorized by Section 401 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The construction contract for Stages II-3A, III and V-1 levee segment and the Stage I-4 demolition contract were completed in FY 1995. Local Cooperation. The local sponsor is the Little Calumet River Basin Development Commission. The local cooperation agreement was signed on August 16, 1990. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights-of-ways; provide all required relocations; and hold and save the United States from any damages due to construction or operation of the project. In addition, the local sponsor is required to pay a five percent cash contribution for structural flood control measures, fifty percent for recreation features and twenty-five percent for fish and wildlife enhancements. A memorandum of agreement with the local sponsor to design non-federal improvements was signed on May 20, 1992. Operations and Results During Period. Continuing construction of Stages II-4 Broadway to King, IV-2A Burr to Clark Streets, IV-2B between Clark and Chase, II-3c(2) between Grant and Harrison, and Rec. I Design Memorandum completed for West Reach (Cline Ave. to the IL/IN state line) in February 1994. Complete FDM work on Burr Street betterment levee and continued design for pump station contract No. 1. Real estate management costs were $169,455 (federal). Engineering and design costs were $1,105,167 ($1,078,790 federal and $26,377 nonfederal) which included $923,852 for hired labor ($904,136 federal and $19,716 non-federal); -$4,375 performed by other Corps of Engineers (federal); and $185,690 by A-E contract ($179,029 federal and $6,661 non-federal). Construction contract costs were $7,394,881 ($6,392,777 federal and $1,002,104 non-federal). Construction management costs were $643,312 (federal). Operations and maintenance costs during construction were $51,782 (federal). Total federal and non-federal costs were $8,336,116 and $1,028,481 respectively. The work for the nonfederal improvements was continued at a cost of $424,831 which included $124,346 for engineering and design, $6,582 for real estate, $125,205 for construction and $168,698 for construction management. 22-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction is in progress. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1998 was $62,874,973 for new work. Federal costs total $57,267,921; required non-federal costs total $4,580,016; and non-federal improvements costs total $1,027,036. 24. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER BASIN, CADY MARSH DITCH, IN Location. Cady Marsh is located in Lake County, Indiana. The Ditch is a tributary of the Little Calumet River system in northwest Indiana and flows through the Towns of Griffith and Highland, Indiana. Existing Project. The Cady Marsh Ditch flood control project was authorized by Section 401 (a) of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. The project provides for diverting flood flows from Cady Marsh Ditch to the Little Calumet River through a diversion system under Arbogast Avenue in Griffith. Specifically, the project consists of improving 1,290 feet of Cady Marsh Ditch between Colfax and Arbogast Avenues in Griffith, constructing approximately 5,000 feet of large conduct pipes under Arbogast Avenue, excavating an open channel approximately 2,850 feet long from the north end of Arbogast Avenue to the Little Calumet River, and constructing interior drainage improvements. Local Cooperation. The local project sponsor is the Town of Griffith, IN. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights-ofway; complete all required utility relocations; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction or operation of the project; provide the required interior drainage improvements; operate and maintain the completed project; and make a cash contribution toward the cost of construction. Operations and Results During the Period. New Work: Preconstruction engineering and design was continued at a cost of $64,346. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Preconstruction engineering and design is in progress. The total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1998 was $1,102,159. 25. McCOOK AND THORNTON RESERVOIRS, IL Location. The McCook Reservoir will be located within the communities of McCook and Hodgkins, Illinois at the existing McCook Quarry. The Thornton Reservoir will be located in the community of Thornton, Illinois at the existing Thornton Quarry. Existing Project. The project consists of converting two quarries into flood storage reservoirs. The McCook Reservoir will have a storage volume of 32,100 acre-feet (10.5 billion gallons); the Thornton Reservoir will have a volume of 14,600 acre-feet (4.8 billion gallons). The reservoirs will store floodwater from tunnels constructed or under construction by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago as part of the Tunnel and Reservoir Project (TARP). Estimated project cost (1998) is $653,000,000, including a federal cost for new work of $490,000,000, and $163,000,000 to be contributed by non-federal interests. The project was authorized by Section 3 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988. Local Cooperation. The Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago will be the local sponsor and provide the required local cooperation. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide all required relocations; and hold and save the United States government free from any damages due to construction or operation of the project. In addition, local sponsors are required to pay a cash contribution to bring the total non-federal share of the flood control improvements to twenty-five percent of the total project cost.. Operations and Results During Period. New Work: Engineering and design was continued at a cost of $3,046,984, with $2,197,982 in hired labor; $820,616 for A-E contracts; $28,386 performed by other Corps of Engineers. Real estate costs were $37,414. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Engineering and design was continued. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1998 were $20,837,615. 26. NORTH BRANCH, CHICAGO RIVER, IL Location. The North Branch Chicago River Basin is located north of the City of Chicago in suburban Cook and Lake Counties. Existing Project. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and consists of constructing two excavated floodwater storage reservoirs on the West Fork and one excavated reservoir on the Middle Fork. Section 401 22-12 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT of the 1986 Act also included authorization to reimburse non-federal interests 50 percent of the costs of planning and construction for three existing reservoirs on the West Fork, known as Techny Reservoirs, and the existing Mid Fork Reservoir on the Middle Fork. In July 1990, the federal government reimbursed the non-federal interests $4,467,298 for the Techny and Mid Fork Reservoirs. The total federal cost was $4,537,435 for these reservoirs. Reservoir 27 in the Village of Bannockburn, is located on the West Fork, 12.7 miles above its confluence with the North Branch Chicago River. It has a floodwater storage capacity of 525 acre-feet. The reservoir construction was completed in June 1990. Reservoir 29A is located 9.6 miles above the mouth of the West Fork and 3.1 miles south of Reservoir 27. The floodwater storage capacity is 575 acre-feet. Two project features, channel relocation and construction of two bridges, are a nonfederal responsibility. Reservoir 29A was substantially completed in September 1994. Reservoir 15 is located near the City of Green Oaks on the Middle Fork, 22.1 miles above its confluence with the North Branch Chicago River. The floodwater storage capacity is 500 acre-feet. The reservoir is approximately 42 feet deep except in the sedimentation pool area which is about 15 feet deeper. Construction of Reservoir 15 was completed in May 1992. The local sponsor has contributed $550,100 for the non-federal improvements for Reservoir 29A. The non-federal clean-up of soils contaminated with lead shot pellets at Reservoir 29A will cost between $6.0 and $8.0 million. Local Cooperation. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide all required relocations; and hold and save the United States government free from any damages due to construction or operation of the project. In addition, local sponsors are required to pay a cash contribution to bring the total non-federal share of the flood control improvements to twenty-five percent of the total project cost. Operations and Results During Period. New Work: Completed spillway modifications at Reservoir Nos. 27 and 29A; pump replacement at Reservoir 29A and trash rack installation at Reservoir 27. The total FY 1998 cost was $346,271 ($346,271 federal and $0 non-federal) which included $237,272 for the construction contract, $51,099 for construction management, and $57,900 for engineering and design. Non-federal funds in the amount of $1,448 were spent for Reservoir 27 to analyze storage capabilities for additional run-off from the Illinois Tollway project. Reservoir 29A lead shot clean-up costs were $48,090 for construction management. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing project is 99 percent complete. Construction of Reservoirs 27 and 29A is complete, except for some limited reservoir side slope stabilization and miscellaneous remaining construction items which will be completed once additional funding is obtained. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1998 were $22,953,169, of which $20,655,917 was federal and $2,297,252 was nonfederal, excluding the $4,493,298 non-federal cost for the Techny and Mid Fork Reservoirs. A total $549,022 in non-federal funds has been expended on bridge and channel betterments at Reservoir 29A. A total of $6,320,134 in non-federal funds has been expended on investigations in connection with the clean-up of soils contaminated with lead shot pellets at Reservoir 29A. Non-federal betterment funds in the amount of $38,500 were expended for work on an impact assessment. A total of $11,166 was spent at Reservoir 27 for the Illinois Tollway project. 27. O'HARE RESERVOIR, IL Location. The reservoir will be located in an unincorporated portion of Elk Grove Township in Northwestern Cook County, Illinois about 1 mile northwest of Chicago O'Hare International Airport. Existing Project. The project consists of a 1,050 acre-foot capacity reservoir, excavated to a depth of 80 feet. The reservoir would be constructed at the terminus of the existing system of 6.6 miles of deep tunnels, constructed under the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago Tunnel and Reservoir Project (TARP). The project was authorized by Section 401 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local Cooperation. The local sponsor is the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago. The local cooperation agreement for the first construction contract, creek relocation, was signed on July 31, 1990. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights-ofway; provide all required relocations; and hold and save the United States government free from any damages due to construction or operation of the project. In addition, the local sponsor is required to pay a cash contribution of five percent of the total project costs. The local cooperation agreement for 22-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 the remainder of the project, reservoir excavation and lining, was signed July 29, 1991. Operations and Results During Period. The reservoir construction was physically completed in July 1998. Construction was continued at a cost of $3,922,608 ($3,573,400 federal and $349,208 nonfederal). Real estate management costs were $13,807 (federal). Engineering and design costs were $177,773 ($172,404 federal and $5,369 non-federal) which included $1,163 ($1,163 federal) performed by other Corps of Engineers and $5,414 ($45 federal and $5,369 non-federal) by A-E contract, and $171,196 ($171,196 federal) by hired labor. Construction management costs were $227,769 (federal). Total federal and non-federal costs were $3,987,380 and $354,577, respectively. Non-federal improvement costs were $1,400,233. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Preconstruction planning and engineering is completed. Construction is substantially completed. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1998 were $36,584,443 for new work. Federal costs total $30,312,247; non-federal costs total $4,344,902; non-federal improvement costs total $1,927,294. 28. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See table 22-F. 29. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities, repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congressional antecedent legislation). Fiscal Year Costs Program to September 30, 1998 Disaster Preparedness Disaster Assistance (FEMA) $ 136,115 267,985 $9,805 federal. The feasibility phase was continued for Kankakee River, Lake and Newton Counties, IN (Sumava Resort) at a cost of $57,400 federal and $17,161 non-federal; Deer Creek, IL at a cost of $83,486 and $21,195 non-federal; Stony Creek, IL, at a cost of $57,764 federal and $17,550 non-federal; Tinley Creek, IL at a cost of $2,311 federal; and Natalie Creek in Oak Forest; IL at a cost of $8,692 federal. Levee construction was completed for North Libertyville Estates, IL at a cost of $1,164,076 federal and $295,444 non-federal. The feasibility phase was completed for Valley View, IL at a cost of $104. The design phase was initiated for Fox River, McHenry County, IL at a cost of $216,348 federal. General Investigations 30. SURVEYS Fiscal Year 1998 costs were $582,224 federal and $463,735 non-federal itemized as follows: Federal Non-federal Flood Damage $ 168,980 $ 121,477 Prevention Studies Shoreline Protection Special Studies Review Authorized Projects Miscellaneous Activities Coordination Studies (RAP/PAS) 2,256 0 61,391 63,504 286,093 0 0 0 0 342,258 31. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal Year 1998 costs were $67,562 federal and $0 non-federal itemized as follows: Federal Non-federal Flood Plain Management $ 62,562 $ 0 Services Hydrologic Studies 5,000 0 Emergency bank protection activities pursuant to Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946, Public Law 526, 79th Congress: A total of $1,050 was spent on the Section 14 coordination account. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 of Flood Control Act of 1965, as amended: Fiscal year 1998 costs were $1,600,910 federal and $351,350 non-federal for flood control activities. A total of $924 was spent on the Section 205 coordination account. The Squaw Creek, Lake County, IL feasibility phase was initiated at a cost of 22-14 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT TABLE 22-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section To in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sept. 30, 1998 1. Burns Waterway Harbor, IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2. Burns Waterway Small Boat Harbor, IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Bumns Waterway Harbor (Major Rehab), (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Chicago Harbor, IL (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: IN Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,628,000 766,000 1,020,000 1,507,047 890,810 1,009,088 0 0 0 0 0 0 385,000 403,364 0 0 0 0 125,900 (17,538) 108,362 0 0 0 0 0 80,000 141,000 5,000 81,794 137,500 2,134 O 0 0 0 0 0 2,747,000 3,518,000 3,675,000 3,557,000 1,992,823 3,934,348 3,500,638 3,948,927 0 0 13,584,000 13,584,000 11,375,104 11,347,078 15,900 15,900 108,362 108,362 2,000,000 2,000,000 0 1,276,935 7,176 1,276,935 1,770,558 1,770,558 13,497,000 13,376,736 22,578,567 1/ 22,578,567 1/ 0 0 0 0 1,400,000 565,000 672,000 912,000 33,574,799 2/ 1,424,681 571,699 674,340 867,649 33,516,709 2/ 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,428,001 3/ 5,428,001 3/ 836,667 836,667 4,788,827 4/ 4,788,827 4/ 22-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 22-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section To in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sept. 30, 1998 (Harbor and Dam Funds) 6. Chicago River, IL (Federal Funds) 7. Indiana Harbor, IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 8. Lake Michigan Diversion, IL (Federal Funds) 9. Michigan City Harbor, IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 10. Waukegan Harbor, IL (Federal Funds) Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 1,815,000 5,505,000 5,409,000 4,562,000 1,783,944 5,405,143 5,376,330 4,512,080 0 0 160,000 152,464 0 0 0 0 0 7,536 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40,337,546 40,051,902 1,326,600 1,326,600 160,000 160,000 1,500,565 5/ 1,500,565 5/ 365,000 395,000 284,000 306,000 15,808,394 6/ 366,910 370,087 302,328 298,532 15,788,830 6/ 0 0 0 0 4,897,148 7/ 4,897,148 7/ 402,000 525,000 642,000 770,000 13,675,988 8/ 377,951 486,192 610,516 762,311 13,556,241 8/ 0 0 0 0 12,500 12,500 469,000 397,000 488,000 782,000 3,871,000 451,026 406,306 500,397 700,799 3,784,541 0 0 0 0 1,543,646 9/ 1,543,646 9/ 226,000 617,000 61,000 126,000 11,902,054 246,715 613,881 45,948 136,729 11,892,512 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 502,000 670,000 743,000 831,000 661,789 644,950 674,928 707,773 1,618,670 1,618,670 30,512 30,512 55,000 55,000 823,026 10/ 823,026 10/ 14,788,768 11/ 14,558,301 11/ 22-16 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT TABLE 22-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section To in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sept. 30, 1998 14. Casino Beach, IL (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 15. Chicago Shoreline, IL (Federal Funds) 16. Illinois Beach State Park, IL (Federal Funds) 17. Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Beverly Shores, IN (Federal Funds) 18. Indiana Shoreline Erosion, IN (Federal Funds) 21. Chicago River North Branch, IL (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 22. Lake George, Hobart, IN (Federal Funds) 23. Little Calumet River, IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds Required) (Non-Federal Improvements) 24. Little Calumet River, Cady Marsh Ditch, IN (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 1,000,000 1,089,216 1,970,000 1,140,650 0 152,000 (12,000) 204,972 579,125 (144,728) 80,000 350,000 139,484 676,773 0 209,080 612,000 300,000 8,000,000 7,392,000 953,778 339,837 3,600,693 7,285,287 (12,800) (9,000) 812 0 0 0 51,000 35,000 58,324 37,447 0 1,700,000 0 435,235 12,800 1,500,000 2,200,000 3,000,000 56,672 358,037 1,846,052 3,179,721 0 0 92,000 86,896 0 5,000 10,964 3,550 O 0 0 0 165,362 0 185,038 72,396 200,000 179,312 2,665,000 2,465,517 2,400,000 2,165,987 17,345,000 12,838,980 13,200 11,908 660,000 660,000 2,296,000 1,031,235 7,131,800 12/ 5,807,324 12/ 191,884 191,884 0 2,612,350 4,060 2,611,329 0 0 0 4,315 0 100,000 3,500,000 242,835 98,460 254,703 1,569,600 3,848,000 9,639,000 8,378,000 5,868,097 7,509,912 9,656,693 8,336,116 420,000 685,000 800,000 962,600 354,383 605,611 799,848 1,028,481 40,000 40,000 1,737,441 1,601,431 4,804,000 1,249,565 57,517,300 13/ 57,267,921 13/ 4,805,600 4,580,016 50,000 328,000 57,500 402,000 1,027,500 51,355 401,424 54,224 424,831 1,027,036 150,000 207,811 0 200,000 468,230 17,815 122,000 64,346 1,342,000 1,102,159 22-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 22-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section To in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sept. 30, 1998 25. McCook and Thornton Reservoirs, IL (Federal Funds) 26. North Branch Chicago River, IL (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds Required) (Non-Federal Improvements) (Non-Federal Lead Shot Clean-up) (Non-Federal Impact Assessment) (Non-Federal Res. 27 IL Tollway) 27. O'Hare Reservoir, IL (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds Required) (Non-Federal Improvements) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 0 0 0 0 1,336,903 2,086,810 2,018,847 3,084,398 0 53,228 0 5,516 0 8,196 200,000 234,569 0 0 0 0 0 5,311,401 150,000 (605,688) 600,000 0 22,374,000 20,837,615 0 300,000 518,000 21,070,500 14/ 8,974 108,255 346,271 20,655,917 14/ 0 (4) 0 0 0 330,653 38,500 9,934 0 28 0 0 0 8,119 0 28,566 20,000 9,718 3,503,000 4,615,000 5,171,047 4,073,508 0 870,000 158,972 553,708 2,297,254 2,297,252 550,100 549,022 0 6,335,170 48,090 6,320,134 0 1,448 38,500 38,500 20,000 11,166 3,447,000 30,447,000 3,987,380 30,312,247 0 354,577 0 580,000 750,000 14,872 512,189 1,400,233 5,061,200 4,344,902 1,930,000 1,927,294 1 Includes $855,973 for previous projects. 2 Excludes contributed funds in settlement pursuant to decree (NO. 54-c-1608) regarding removal of flue dust and includes $45,230 for previous projects. 3 Includes $689,001 in steelement pursuant to decree regarding removal of flue dust. 4 Includes $446,005 for previous projects. 5 Includes $955,886 for previous projects. 6 Includes $109,463 for previous projects. 7 Includes $60,668 for previous projects. 8 Includes $2,509 for previous projects. 9 Includes $287,389 for previous projects. 10 Includes $218,233 for previous projects. 11 Includes $15,711 for previous projects. 12 Includes $107,000 of CP&E funds obligated prior to 1 Oct 1985 which are excluded from total project costs IAW EC 1105-2-159, 25 Sep 1985. 13 Includes $670,529 of CP&E funds obligated prior to 1 Oct 1985 which are excluded from total project costs IAW EC 1105-2-159, 25 Sep 1985. 14 Includes $670,529 of CP&E funds obligated prior to 1 Oct 1985 which are excluded from total project costs IAW EC 1105-2-159, 25 Sep 1985. 22-18 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT TABLE 22-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 14, 1960 Sec. 107 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Jun. 25, 1910 Sep. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 19351.2 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 19453 Jul. 14, 196013 Oct. 23, 196213 Oct 27, 196513 BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN (See Section 1 and 3 of Text) Provides for breakwater and channel to present dimensions and depths, a north breakwater, west bulkhead, approach channel and outer harbor, east and west harbor arms. BURNS WATERWAY SBH, IN (See Section 2 of Text) Provides for a 700-foot north breakwater, a 950-foot west breakwater an entrance channel 11-feet deep, a harbor-of-refuge area 10 feet deep and a channel in Burns Waterway 6 feet deep. CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL AND IN (See Section 4 of Text) Outer harbor protected by breakwaters. Five turning basins. Provided for shape and dimensions of turning basins. Consolidated the two projects for Calumet Harbor and Calumet River. Detached breakwater, dredging outer harbor to existing project depth and dimensions; deepen river entrance channel and river to existing project depths; widen and straighten river channel; five turning basins to same depth as adjacent channel. Dredging area A and B in south end of Lake Calumet and an entrance channel 300 feet wide and 21 feet deep. An approach channel to harbor 3,200 feet wide and 28 feet deep through shoals outside breakwater and closing existing gap between breakwaters. Depth of 29 feet in lake approach to 28 feet in outer harbor, and 27 feet in river entrance up to E.J. & E. Ry. Bridge. Deepen, widen and straighten channel in Calumet River from E.J. and E. Ry. Bridge, to and including turning basins 1, 3 and 5 to 27 feet; enlarge turning basins 3 and 5; channel into Lake Calumet to 27 feet deep for 3,000 feet and a width of 1,000 feet; and eliminate turning basins 2 and 4 from project. Modification of Act of Oct 23, 1962. Protection for Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway Bridge over the Calumet River, to permit dredging to full width of the south draw to depth of 27 feet, and temporary Public Law, 89-298, H. Doc. 160. 88th Cong., 1st Sess. Detailed Project Report detailed February 1983. Annual Report, 1896, pp. 2584 et Seq. and H. Doc. 277, 54th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 172, 54 th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 346, 60th Cong., 1 st Sess. H. Doc. 494, 72 nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 180, 7 3rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 233, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 149, 86th Cong., 1St Sess.8 H. Doc. 87 th Cong., 2nd Sess.5 H.R. 973, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. protection for center pier and south abutment of the New York, Chicago and St. Louis Railroad Bridge (Nickel Plate) to permit dredging of full width of south bridge draw to depth of 27 feet prior to its replacement. 22-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 22-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 11, 1870 Jun. 14, 1880 Mar. 3, 1899 Jul. 25, 1912 Mar. 2, 1919 CHICAGO HARBOR, IL (See Section 5 of Text) Inner breakwaters and inner basin. H. Ex. Doc. 114, 41st Cong. 2 nd Sess. and Annual Report 1870, pp. 1562-1567 Annual Report 1870, pp. 1562-1567 Exterior breakwater. Present project depth in basin and entrance to Chicago River. Shore-arm and southerly extension of exterior breakwater Modification of area to be dredged in inner basin. Mar 3, 1931 Shore-arm extension of exterior breakwater transferred to Lincoln Park Commissioners. Mar. 2, 1945 Resumption of jurisdiction over shore-arm extension breakwater and over certain navigable waters in Lake Michigan which lie in northwestern part of outer harbor. Oct. 23, 1962 Deepen a lake approach channel to 29 by 800 feet wide for 6,600 feet; deepen channel and maneuver area inside harbor entrance to 28 by 1,300 feet wide. Dec. 4, 1981 Provides for lock operations and maintenance responsibilities in the Jul. 30, 1983 interests of navigation. Annual Report 1897, pp. 2790-2791 H.Doc 710, Cong, 2d Sess H.Doc 1303, 64th Cong, 1St Sess. Public Law 797, 71st Cong Public Law 14, 79th Cong. H.Doc. 485, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.4 Sec. 107 of P.L. 97-88 P.L. 98-63 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 24, 1946 Jun 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar 2, 1919 CHICAGO RIVER, IL (See Section 6 of Text) For project depth of 21 feet in lieu of that fixed by act of Jun 3, 1896. Turning basins Interpreted by Chief of Engineers, April 11, 1908, as adopting new work of the then existing project for 21-foot depth. Eliminated all work except maintenance of main river. Dredging channel 9 feet deep to within 30 feet of existing bulkheads and river banks from North Ave. to Belmont Ave., thence 9 feet deep and 50 feet wide to Addison St. INDIANA HARBOR, IN (See Section 7 of Text) Maintenance of outer harbor. Maintenance of inner harbor channel when deeded free of cost to and accepted by the United States. Breakwaters. Lighthouse crib, present length and alignment easterly and northerly breakwaters. Specified in act. Specified in act. H. Doc. 95, 56" Cong. 1st Sess. (Annual Report, 1900, p. 3863 and Annual Report 1909, p. 709) H. Doc. 1294, 64th Cong. 1St Sess. H. Doc 767, 7 8th Cong., 2nd Sess.6 ,7 H. Doc. 1113, 60th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 690, 6 2 nd Cong., 2 nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6, 65 th Cong., 2 nd Sess. 22-20 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT TABLE 22-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 20, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 Mar. 2, 1929 July 3, 193010 Jul. 30, 1932 Aug. 30, 1935" Aug. 28, 1937 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 196512 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar, 3, 1889 Reduce channel length to be maintained in extension to Lake George Authorized Secretary of War to modify project so far as relates to length and alignment of breakwaters and to sell Youngstown Steel and Tube Co. about 1,180 linear feet of shoreward end of existing north breakwater. Accept 2.3 acres of land for construction of the Forks Turning Basin. Existing project channel width and depth in Lake George Branch and turning basin at the Forks Authorized Secretary of War to sell to Inland Steel Co., about 1,903 linear feet of southerly end of existing east breakwater. Extended easterly breakwater, dredge entrance channel and outer harbor, deepen channel between bulkhead fills, widen main stem of canal and portion of Calumet River Branch to 141st St. Modified conditions of local cooperation required before enlargement of Indiana Harbor Canal is undertaken by United States. Increase authorized depths of 29 feet in outer harbor entrance channel, 28 feet in outer harbor and 27 feet in canal entrance channel to first E. J. and E. Ry. Bridge. Deepen main canal from landward end of canal entrance channel to a point lakeward of Dickey Place Bridge over a modified channel width of 190 feet, except through bridge openings. LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSION (See Section 8 of Text) Responsible for monitoring of Lake Michigan Diversion. MICHIGAN CITY HARBOR, IN (See Section 9 of Text) East breakwater and old east pier enclosing the outer basin. Extension of east pier. Extend east pier and construct detached breakwater. Mar 3, 1905 Lower turning basin. Rebuild west pier as at present location. Present project dimensions of entrance channel. Jun. 21, 1927 Existing project depth in channel, and in lower and middle turning basins, eliminated improvement of Trail Creek above middle turning basin and uncompleted portion of detached breakwater, abandonment of old east breakwater and old east pier enclosing outer basin. Public Law 176, 67 th Cong Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 7 1 st Cong., 2 nd Sess. Public Law 219, 7 2 nd Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 29, 7 2 nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 75"th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 195, 86th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 227, 89th Cong. 1st Sess. Section 1142, WRDA of 1986 Recommendations of a Board of Engineers, Annual Report 1870, p. 123. Reports of Boards of Engineers, Annual Rpt 1851, pp. 2187-2189; Annual Report 1882, p. 2264-2266. Annual Report 1897, pp. 2903-2904. Joint Resolution of Cong. approved May 13, 1908. Public Law 23. H. Doc. 279, 69" Cong., 1 st Sess. 22-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 22-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Restore and repair westerly 1,000 feet of east breakwater, dredging outer basin and enlarging entrance to basin through east pier. Jul. 14, 1960 Dredge river channel 50 feet wide and 6 feet deep from upper turning. Sec. 107 basin to E. Street Bridge. WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL (See Section 10 of Text) Jun. 14, 1880 Parallel piers and basins. Aug. 3, 1882 Modified location of harbor entrance. Jun. 13, 1902 Detached breakwater, extend piers, increase width of harbor at inner end of north pier and dredge channel and basin to depth of 20 feet. Jul. 3, 1930 Extension of breakwater to shore, dredging near outer end of north piers and enlarging inner basin. Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 17, 1970 Sec. 201 Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Dec. 4, 1981 Jul. 30, 1983 Dredge an entrance channel to existing project dimensions from outer end of north pier to project depth in lake and dredge an anchorage area in southwest corner of inner basin to existing project depth. Abandonment of dredging triangular area in southwest corner of inner basin to 18 feet deep. Provides for deepening the existing entrance channel in the outer harbor to 25 feet and extending to the depth in Lake Michigan, at widths varying from 380 feet to 500 feet; deepening the channel River and Harbors Committee Doc 34, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Detailed Project Report dated June 19658. Annual Rpt 1880, p. 142 Annual Report 1882, pp. 277, 2162. H. Doc. 343, 56th Cong., 1 st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc 27, 71st Cong., 2 nd Sess. H. Doc. 116, 77 th Cong., 1 st Sess. H. Doc. 368, 90" Cong., 2nd Sess. between piers to a depth of 23 feet at a width of 180 feet and deepening the inner basin to 23 feet and extending its limits approximately 275 feet northward. CASINO BEACH, IL (See Section 14 of Text) Provides for encasing approximately 1,800 feet of the existing Casino Feasibility Report Beach jetty in steel sheet piling and a concrete cap and replacing dated Feb. 1983. beach fill. ILLINOIS BEACH STATE PARK, IL (See Section 16 of Text) Provides for 46 offshore breakwaters approximately 150 feet long, initial beach nourishment of 100,000 cubic yards and periodic nourishment of 100,000 cubic yards at 5-year intervals. INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE, BEVERLY SHORES, IN (See Section 17 of Text) Provides for emergency shore protection repairs to stone revetment initially constructed in 1973. Feasibility Report dated June 1982. Public Law 97-88 Provides for operations and maintenance of shore protection measures. Public Law 98-63 22-22 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT TABLE 22-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 Nov. 17, 1986 Dec. 31, 1970 Nov. 17, 1986 Work Authorized INDIANA SHORELINE EROSION, IN (See Section 18 of Text) Beach nourishment of 2-mile reach of shore west of Michigan City Harbor, Indiana LAKE GEORGE, HOBART, IN (See Section 22 of Text) Removal of silt, aquatic growth and construction of silt traps. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IN (See Section 23 of Text) Provides for levee construction, a diversion control structure at the mouth of Hart Ditch. Permanent evacuation of a portion of the Black Oak area of Gary and non-structural flood proofing measures in Gary. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER BASIN, CADY MARSH DITCH, IN (See Section 24 of Text) Widening and deepening 1,250 feet of Cady Marsh Ditch, installing 4,880 feet of pipe and excavating 2,850 feet of open channel. McCOOK AND THORNTON RESERVOIRS, IL (See Section 25 of Text) Provides for construction of two floodwater storage reservoirs in the quarries of the same name. NORTH BRANCH CHICAGO RIVER, IL (See Sections 21 and 26 of Text) Construction of three reservoirs and reimbursement to locals for 50% of the costs of Techny and Mid-Fork Reservoirs Clearing fallen trees, roots and other debris and objects which contribute to flooding. O'HARE RESERVOIR, IL (See Section 27 of Text) Provides for a 1,050 acre-foot excavated reservoir. Documents Sec. 501, WRDA 1986 Sec. 602, WRDA1986. Sec. 401, WRDA 1986 Feasibility Report dated April 1984 Sec. 3, WRDA 1988 H. Doc. 100-72, 100 th Cong., 1st Sess., Sec. 401, WRDA 1986. River and Harbor Act (Sec. 116) Sec. 401, WRDA 1986 1. Included in Public Works Administrative Program Sep. 6, 1943 and Dec. 16, 1933. 2. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (dredging in front of U.S. Steel Corp.) 3. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (breakwater closure). 4. Contains latest map of harbor. Uncompleted portion is inactive. 5. Contains latest map of river. 6. Latest published map is in Annual Report for 1914, opposite p. 2928. 7. Contains latest published map of North Branch above North Ave. 8. Contains latest published map. 9. Completed under previous project. 10. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (widen and deepen Lake George Branch). 11. Include in Public Works Administration Program Sep. 6, 1933 and Jul. 25, 1934. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (widen and deepen main canal and Calumet River Branch). 12. Project deauthorized in 1977. 13. Project deauthorized in 1989. 22-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 22-C EXISTING NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Section Length Width Depth In Text Project Item (feet) (feet) (feet) 1. Burns Waterway North Breakwater 4,630 Harbor, IN 2. Burns Waterway SBH, IN 4. Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN 5. Chicago Harbor, IL 6. Chicago River, IL West Breakwater Approach Channel Outer Harbor East Harbor Arm West Harbor Arm North Breakwater West Breakwater Approach Channel Burns Waterway Northerly Crib Breakwater Southerly Steel Breakwater North Pier Chicago Confined Disposal Facility Approach Channel Outer Harbor River Entrance Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Bridge to turning basin No. 3 Turning Basin No. 3 to Turning Basin No.5 Approach into Lake Calumet Extension in Lake Calumet Turning Basins 1, 3 and 5 Shore Arm Extension Exterior Breakwater Exterior Breakwater Southerly Extension North Inner Breakwater South Inner Breakwater North Pier Approach Channel Channel and maneuver Lock Inner Basin Entrance Channel Main Branch of Chicago River North Branch of Chicago River North Branch Canal North Branch Turning Basin 22-24 1,200 2,200 3,700 2,100 3,800 678 1,043 1,200 5,593 6,714 5,007 2,450 2,979 9,700 10,500 3,000 21,000 8,000 4,000 3,000 2,250 5,421 4,944 4,034 2,544 960 6,600 2,200 600 1,270 7,300 3,800 11,100 5,500 400 Varies 620 620 200 100 3,200 3,000 290 200 and variable Variable 400 1,000 800 1,300 80 740 190-470 190-390 91-390 56-210 30 28 27 27 11 9 29 28 27 27 earth 28 rock 27 27 27 27 29 28 23 21 21 21 21 21 21 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT TABLE 22-C EXISTING NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Section Length Width Depth In Text Project Item (feet) (feet) (feet) 7. Indiana Harbor, IN Northerly Breakwater 1,120 Easterly Breakwater 2,525 Approach Channel 7,200 800 29 Outer Harbor 7,200 Varies 28 Entrance Channel 3,600 65-280 27 Main Channel 7,400 61-210 22 Turning Basin 22 Lake George Branch 3,700 64-160 22 Calumet River Branch 2,500 160-260 22 9. Michigan City Harbor Detached Breakwater 1,304 22 IN West Pier 835 East Pier 2,276 East Breakwater 1,000 Entrance Channel 1,900 150-425 18 Main Channel 2,400 120-150 18 Outer Basin 900 900 8-12 Trail Creek 3,000 50-100 8 Trail Creek 2,300 50 6 10. Waukegan Harbor, IL North Breakwater and Shore Connection 1,896 North Pier into North Revetment 2,074 South Pier 3,111 Entrance Channel 3,250 390 22 Channel to Inner Basin 1,700 200 18 Inner Basin 1,650 375-500 18 Anchorage Area ' 1 8 'Area of about 6 acres. 22-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 22-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATION Cost to September 30, 1998 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Calumet River Bridges' 1967 $1,625,068 'Transferred to Department of Transportation in accordance with Section 6(g) of the Act of October 16,1966. P.L. 89-670 TABLE 22-E OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1998 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Mt. Baldy, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, IN 1984 $1,500,000 Hollywood-Ardmore Beach, Chicago, IL 1982 237,271 Evanston, IL 1979 766,052 Lake Michigan-Lake Bluff, IL 1976 244,889 Lake Michigan-Lake Forest, IL' 1975 65,611 Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Kenilworth, IL2 1975 5,200 'Authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1954. 2Uncompleted portion deauthorized in 1977. TABLE 22-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1998 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Lake Michigan, Edgewater/Rogers Park Communities, Chicago, IL 1989 $2,062,347 Little Calumet River, IL 1984 583,000 Kankakee River Ice Management 1993 44,791 22-26 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT TABLE 22-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Winnetka, IL 1975 1977 Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Chicago, IL 1975 1977 Kankakee River, IL and IN Levee between Shelby Bridge and Baum's Bridge in IN 1938 Nov 17, 1986 Little Calumet River, IL and IN Little Calumet River and Tributaries, IL and IN 1968 Nov 17, 1986 53,136 Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN Widening and straightening the Calumet River in the vicinity of 106t h Street and closing the gap between breakwaters, and dredging minor shoals in the outer harbor. 1990 Jan 1, 1990 Wilmington Ice Control Demonstration ---- Nov 18, 1991 22-27 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT * This district comprises portions of southern Kentucky, southwestern Virginia, western North Carolina, northern Georgia and Alabama, northeastern Mississippi and practically all of Tennessee except western portion, and embraces drainage basins of Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers and their tributaries. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Cumberland River, TN and KY.............................23-2 2. Kentucky Lock.............................. ....... 23-3 3. Tennessee River, TN, AL and KY ......................... 23-3 4. Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS ................................................................... 23-4 5. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ....... .......... ... ....23-4 Alteration of Bridges 6. Authorized Alteration of Bridges.........................23-4 Flood Control 7. Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, KY and TN ................................ 23-4 8. Martins Fork Lake, KY ..................................... 23-5 9. Middlesboro, Cumberland River Basin, KY .........23-5 10. Tug and Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, W VA, VA and KY.........................................23-5 11. Ohio River Basin (Nashville Dist.) ....................... 23-6 12. Inspection of completed flood control projects ............................................................ 23-6 13. Flood control work under special authorization............................................ ........... 23-6 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 14. Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN...............23-6 15. Dale Hollow Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN and KY........ .................................. 23-7 16. J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN .................................................. 23-7 17. Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY ............. 23-7 18. Wolf Creek Dam - Lake Cumberland, Ohio River Basin, KY .................................................... 23-8 General Investigations 19. Surveys................................................................ 23-8 20. Collection and study of basic data ....................... 23-8 21. Preconstruction Engineering and Design .... 23-8 Tables Page Table 23-A Cost & Financial Statement ..................... 23-9 Table 23-B Authorizing Legislation ......................... 23-11 Table 23-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects............................. ...... 23-13 Table 23-D Not Applicable ................................. Table 23-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects..................................................23-13 Table 23-F Other Authorized Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power .................... 23-14 Table 23-G Deauthorized Projects ........................... 23-14 Table 23-H Cumberland River, TN & KY, Principal Features..................................23-15 Table 23-I Tennessee River Lock Dimensions.......23-16 Table 23-J Tennessee River Total Cost of Existing Project......................................23-17 Table 23-K Ohio River Basin (Nashville District) Local Protection ...................... 23-17 Table 23-L Reservoirs ..................................... 23-17 Table 23-M Table 23-N Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ..................................... 23-18 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization.........................................23-18 23-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACIVITIES, FY 1998 Navigation 1. CUMBERLAND RIVER, TN AND KY Location. Formed by junction of Poor and Clover Forks in Harlan County, KY, about 694.2 miles above its mouth, and flows west to Burnside, KY, from whence it makes a loop southwestward into Tennessee, passes Nashville, and returns northwestward to Kentucky, emptying into Ohio River near Smithland, KY (See Geological Survey base maps of Tennessee and Kentucky.) Previous projects. For details see pages 1898 and 1901 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1208 of Annual Report for 1938, and pages 1069 and 1070 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Below Nashville: Improvement of Cumberland River between mouth and Nashville was authorized for 9-foot navigation; increased project depth to be obtained by construction of three moderate height dams with lockage facilities, designated as Kuttawa (Eureka), Dover, and Cheatham, to replace existing locks A to F inclusive below Nashville and lock 1 above Nashville. (See table 23-B for authorizing legislation.) Subsequent authorities provide for construction of hydroelectric powergenerating facilities at Cheatham Dam, rivermile 148.7, and modification of project for navigation on Cumberland River, TN and KY, to provide, in lieu of previously authorized works at Kuttawa, mile 32.2, and Dover, mile 100.1, for construction of a multiple-purpose improvement consisting of a dam, lock, and powerplant near mile 30.6 on lower Cumberland River and a canal for navigation and other purposes connecting this reservoir with reservoir formed by Kentucky Dam on the Tennessee River. The project is known as Barkley Dam and Lake Barkley. Provision of interconnecting canal, involving excavation of a channel through narrow watershed divide about 2.5 miles upstream from damsite, permits alternatives routes available for navigation between either Cumberland or Tennessee Rivers and Ohio River, and affords integrated operation of Barkley and Kentucky Reservoirs through diversion of flows in interests of flood control and power production. Cost of modified project for 9-foot navigation and multiple-purpose development is $178,181,406 Federal funds and $102,966 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. (See table 23- H for listing of principal features.) Under flood conditions as regulated by upstream reservoirs, extreme fluctuation in stage of river below Nashville, TN, varies at different localities from about 16 to 55 feet above minimum pool levels. Ordinary fluctuations vary with power flows from as much as the allowable 3-foot drawdown below normal pool elevation 385 at Cheatham Lock and Dam to a range of about 7 feet at Nashville. Seasonal variation in normal headwater levels at Lake Barkley is 5 feet, which in combination with power flows produces fluctuations up to 10 feet below Cheatham Lock and Dam. Above Nashville: See pages 1693 thru 1696 of Annual Report for 1950 for information including statistical data on locks and dams 1 to 17 and 21. Completion information is shown on pages 1454 of the report for 1951. See Table 23-B for Authorizing Legislation. Construction of Old Hickory, Carthage, and Celina Dams above Nashville was also authorized for navigation and power. The dam and reservoir authorized for construction on Cumberland River near Carthage, TN, has been redesignated as Cordell Hull Dam and Reservoir. Cost of Old Hickory and Cordell Hull projects, including locks, is $132,140,904. (See table 23-H at end of chapter for listing of principal features.) Celina Dam was deauthorized in 1995. Under flood conditions as presently regulated, including effect of surcharge operation of Old Hickory project, extreme fluctuations of stage in this section of river vary from a range of 35 feet at Nashville (mile 191) to a maximum of 46 feet immediately below Old Hickory Dam (mile 216.2), and from an 8-foot variation in headwater at dam to 36 feet in vicinity of Carthage, TN, (mile 313.5), present head of navigation; with variations up to 35 feet at Celina, TN (mile 380.8) and 29 feet in tail water at Wolf Creek Dam (mile 460.9). Maximum fluctuations under ordinary conditions from power flows vary from about 7 feet at Nashville to 14 and 3 feet, respectively, in tailwater and headwater of Old Hickory Dam, and at other key points as follows: 13 feet at Carthage; 18 feet at Celina; and 19 feet at Wolf Creek Dam. Further details on project authorization for river sections below and above Nashville as shown on Table 23-B. Local cooperation. Under modified project for 9-foot navigation and multiple-purpose development, recreation features of reservoir components are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Terminal facilities. There are 42 terminals on the Cumberland River (5 Municipally owned and open for public use; 5 government owned facilities and 32 privately owned facilities). A total of 18 terminals have railroad connections. Principal commodities handled are petroleum products, stone, sands, gravel, coal, coke, iron, steel, chemicals and grain. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. For further information see page 695 of Annual Report for 1969. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance improvements included completion of replacement of the alarm system at Cheatham, Cordell Hull, and Old Hickory Power Plants. A construction contract was completed to repair concrete cracks at the lock gates on Barkley Lock. The spillway bulkheads at Cheatham Power Plant were repaired. Maintenance incluced dewatering and repairs to Cheatham Lock. The miter gates at Cheatham Lock were inspected and repaired as per current regulations for hydraulic steel structures. New culvert intake screens were installed at Old Hickory Lock. The upper wicket dam, which had been repaired and painted, was reinstalled at Cheatham Lock. Work continued on the inspection and repair of all lock dewatering structures. Construction was completed on comfort stations at Bumpus Mills on Barkley and at Laguardo on Old Hickory Lake. Channel mainte- 23-2 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT nance dredging of approximately 12,000 cubic yeards of material was removed from one site by hired labor. An estimated 24 million tons of commodities wer locked through the Cumberland River Locks. Commercial lockages were approximately 5,700 and 5,600 recreational craft were also locked through. Total sales energy generated at Barkley Dam (781,156,000kw-hr) was made available through Southeastern Power Assoiciation to the Tennessee Valley Authority. Southern Illinois power Cooperative, Big Rivers Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation, and Indianan a Statewide Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc, Hosier energy Division. Total sales energy generated at Cheatham Dam (199,722,000kw-hr), Cordell Hull (425,155,000 kw-hr), and Old Hickory (546,338,000 kw-hr) was made available for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program comprising malaria control, shoreline sanitation, land management and disposal, and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 2. KENTUCKY LOCK ADDITION, KY Location. Kentucky Lock and Dam is located in western Kentucky at Mile 22.4 of the Tennessee River between Livingston and Marshall Counties. Existing Project. Kentucky L&D was completed in 1945 by the Tennessee Valley Authority(TVA). TVA continues to operate the dam and powerhouse while operation of the 110'x600' navigation lock is the reponsibility of the Nashville District. Products from 20 states pass through the system of Kentucky and Barkley Locks, the lower-most locks on the Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers, respectively. Over 80% of the commercial tows hauling these products pass through KY Lock instead of Barkley Lock because of difficult and costly navigation on the Cumberland River below Barkley. Since most of the tows are greater than 600' in length, they must perform a time-consuming "double-cut" to transit through the existing 600' long KY Lock. This results in average delays of approximately six hours per tow under existing traffic levels. Since the traffic levels are expected to grow in the near future, these delays will also increase. The last traffic forecast developed in 1995 estimated that 43M tons of products would be transported through the Kentucky- Barkley system in the year 2000. Actual tonage for the system in 1997 was 43.5 M tons. It costs a tow about $400/hour to wait in line at the lock. Construction of a new 1200' lock would eliminate the delay time in the near term and drastically shorten it for forecasted traffic levels past the year 2020. Project Description. The 1992 Kentucky Lock Feasiblity report recommended a new 110 x 1200' lock adjacent and landward of the existing lock. The project was authorized for construction in WRDA 96. Average annual benefits attirubted to a new lock are $55.1M. Most of these benefits are associated with improving the performance of the lock by reducing traffic delays and disruptive lock outages for maintenance and major rehabilitation work. Based on an estimated construction cost of $395M (Oct '97), the new lock has a Benefit/Cost ratio of 2.5. Other project features in addition to the new lock itself are three major relocation efforts: 1) four large TVA transmission towers, 2) about 2 miles of the Paducah and Louisville Railway, including a major river bridge, and 3) about 2 miles of US Highway 62, also including a new major river bridge. Operations during fiscal year. FY 1998 funding of $4M was used to advance the design of the project and to initiate construction of the relocation of the transmission towers. Significant activities include: 1)revisions to the Lock Model and initiation of the General Model at the Waterways Experiment Station; 2) continued design of the lock including advancements in the upstream and downstream approach walls, culvert valves, lock stability, site development and electrical/mechancial interfaces; 3) initiation of the P&L Railroad relocation Design Memorandum 4) continued geotechnical land and overwater exploration for the RR relocation, approach walls, and cofferdams, and 5) revised quantity development for the current project design. The project's construction start consisted of the construction of a $120K access road on the powerhouse island necessary for the exploration and construction of the foundations for the tower pull-off structures. 3. TENNESSEE RIVER, TN, AL AND KY Location. Formed by junction of French Broad and Holston Rivers in eastern Tennessee, 4.4 miles above Gay Street Bridge at Knoxville, flows southwest into northern Alabama, thence in a generally westerly course across north Alabama, to northeast boundary of Mississippi, thence nearly due north across Tennessee and Kentucky, entering Ohio River at Paducah, 652.1 miles from junction of French Broad and Holston Rivers. (See Geological survey base map of Tennessee River Basin.) Previous projects. For details see pages 1902-1906, Annual Report for 1915; pages 1190-1194, 1196-1216, and 1220-1222, Annual Report for 1929; and page 1216, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Originally provided for permanent improvement of river for a navigable depth of 9 feet at low water from mouth about 650 miles to Knoxville, TN. Only work performed by the Corps was construction of lock at General Joe Wheeler Dam and miscellaneous appurtenant improvements at a new work cost of $2,244,236. Tennessee Valley Authority program provided for obtaining authorized 9-foot project by construction of high dams and locks and utilization of certain locks and dams previously constructed under jurisdiction of the Corps. (See Table 23-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Subsequent construction by the TVA of Melton Hill Dam extends navigable channel of Tennessee River system up the Clinch River about 38 miles above damsite (mile 23.1) to vicinity of Clinton, TN. (See table 23-1 on Tennessee River.) In accordance with general navigation laws placing control and supervision over navigable waters under direction of Secretary of the Army, the Corps of Engineers operates and maintains all locks, and maintains navigation channels and safety harbors by performing all necessary mainte- 23-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1998 and safety harbors by performing all necessary maintenance dredging and snagging operations. For information concerning other functions of the Corps under division of responsibilities for Tennessee River since adoption of Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933, see page 1084 of Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Authorization requires no local cooperation in construction of alternate system of low dams. It does, however, provide that if high dams are built before the United States builds projected locks and low dams which are to be replaced, the United States shall contribute to cost of substituted structures an amount equal to estimated cost of works of navigation for which substitution is made. Terminal facilities. There are 150 terminals on the Tennessee River (13 municipally owned, 15 government owned facilities and 122 privately owned facilities). A total of 79 terminals have railroad connections. Principal commodities handled are petroleum products, stone, sand, gravel, coal, coke, grain, chemicals, iron, and steel. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. A list of terminals is revised annually and can be obtained from Division Engineer, Ohio River Division, Corps of Engineers, Cincinnati, Ohio. For further information see page 698 of Annual Report for 1969. Operations during fiscal year. Channel work by government plant and hired labor consisted of dredging and snagging at various locations, and maintenance of mooring facilities and safety harbors. Cost of channel maintenance was $166,821. Maintenance: All locks were operated and lock appurtenances and standby plant maintained as required. Major maintenance included dewatering and repairs to Nickajack Auxiliary. The floating caisson used for dewatering several locks was repaired and painted. An additional floating mooring bitt and recess was installed at Kentucky Lock. New miter gate anchor bars were installed at Ft. Loudoun and Watts Bar Locks. The upgrade of electric service feeders for Wilson Locks and Florence Repair Station were completed. Damaged timbers on floating boom walls were replaced at Kentucky and Wilson Main Locks. New floating caisson recess slot fillers were installed at Nickajack Auxiliary Lock. Fabrication of new truss dewatering declosure for Ft. Loudoun was started. Work continued on inspection and repair of all dewatering closures. Channel maintenance dredging of approximately 94,000 cubic yards of material was removed from three sites by hired labor. An estimated 50 million tons of commodities were locked through the Tennessee River Locks. Commercial locakges were approximately 23,700 and 25,200 recreational craft were also locked through. 4. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL AND MS Location. West Central Alabama and Northeastern Mississippi; in Marengo, Sumter, Greene and Pickens Counties, Alabama, and Noxubee, Lowndes, Clay, Monroe, Itawamba, Prentiss and Tishomingo Counties, Mississippi. Existing project. Provides for a waterway 234 miles in length, connecting the Tombigbee and Tennessee Rivers by way of the East Fork of Tombigbee River, Mackeys and Yellow Creeks, affording a channel not less than 9 feet deep and 280 feet in bottom width, with 10 locks each having clear chamber dimensions of 110 x 600 feet. Construction for the divide section, including Bay Springs lock and dam, is assigned to the Nashville District; whereas, the prosecution of work on the river and canal sections is under the jurisdiction of the Mobile District. Only activities of the Nashville District are reported herein. Local cooperation. Authorization requires local interests to construct, maintain and operate all highway bridges, construct and maintain all highway relocations or alterations, make and maintain alterations as required to sewer, water supply and drainage facilities, assume cost of operation and maintenance of utility crossings, provide and maintain as required suitable and adequate river and canal terminals in accordance with plans approved by the Secretary of the Army and the Chief of Engineers. Operations during fiscal year. The Mobile District is responsible for operation and maintenance of the entire Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway. The project is 100% complete. 5. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthortzatton). During the period no money was expended for Section 107 Projects. Alteration of Bridges 6. AUTHORIZED ALTERATION OF BRIDGES Work on Woodland Street bridge, under Truman-Hobbs Act, was initiated in 1965 and completed in 1966. Costs were $987,632. For details see page 922 of Annual Report for 1967. Flood Control 7. BIG SOUTH FORK NATIONAL RIVER AND RECREATIONAL AREA, KY AND TN Location. The project is located in Northeastern Tennessee and Southeastern Kentucky along the Big South Fork River and its tributaries in Pickett, Scott, Fentress, and Morgan Counties, Tennessee, and McCreary County, Kentucky. Existing project. A National Recreation Area was established in accordance with the concept included in the interagency report prepared pursuant to section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1968. Total acreage was not to exceed 125,000 acres. The act specifically established the National Area for the purpose of preserving and interpreting the scenic, biological, archeological and historical 23-4 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT resources of the river gorge area and developing the natural recreational potential of the area. The project was authorized by the Water Resource Development Act of 1974, 1976 and Water Resources Development Act of 1986. (See table 232B for authorizing legislation). The authorized cost (ceiling) for the project was $156,122,000. $112,588,920 was appropriated to The Corp of Engineers for design and construction of park facilities. The first construction contract was awarded in June 1981. 72% of the authorized project is complete. By Memorandum of Agreement dated 1 October 1990 jurisdiction of the area was transferred to The Department of Interior. Local cooperation. None required. Operation during fiscal year. The Memorandum of Agreement between the Department of Army and the Department of Interior, transferring jurisdiction of the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, itemized activities to be completed by the Army. In accordance with this agreement, miscellaneous minor construction items were completed. 8. MARTINS FORK LAKE, KY Location. Dam located at mile 15.6 on Martins Fork of Clover Fork, Cumberland River, about 10 miles southeast of city of Harlan, with reservoir extending about 6 miles upstream within Harlan County, southeastern Kentucky. Existing project. Multiple-purpose improvement combining flood control with water quality control and recreation development adopted by 1965 Flood Control Act (H. Doc.244, 89th Cong.), in general accordance with recommendations. Dam is concrete type, 504 feet long and rising 97 feet above streambed. Outlet works provide for release of water from reservoir at varying levels. Drainage area above damsite is 55.7 square miles. At full pool level, spillway crest at elevation 1341 above mean sea level, reservoir will cover 578 acres and contain 21,120 acre-feet of storage capacity. Provision is made for 17,450 acre-feet of reservoir capacity between elevations 1341 and 1300 for control of floods in winter and spring season, and 14,360 acre-feet (El. 1341-1310) during summer and fall, in conjunction with which storage of 3,090 acre-feet would be available on a seasonal basis to meet streamflow requirements for water quality control and fish life below the dam. A minimum permanent pool of 3,670 acre-feet, 274 acres in extent, is available during the potential flood seasons; and during late spring and summer when flood storage can be reduced, the lake is operated generally at a higher level (El. 1310) to maintain a larger surface area of 340 acres for recreation and provide the required seasonal storage for releases of water during critical low-flow periods. Project prevents a major portion of average annual flood losses at Harlan and results in significant stage reductions with related benefits along rural reaches and to other urban areas downstream. Actual cost of project including $95,000 code 710 funds is $20,479,911. First construction contract awarded in December 1972. Project completed for beneficial use in September 1978. Local cooperation. Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 (P.L. 89-72) applies in regard to non-Federal participation in recreation development, in addition to which local interests are to provide certain safeguards to ensure functioning of reservoir as intended. In May 1981 a final recreation cost-sharing contract with Harlan County was approved and certain recreation facilities have been jointly developed by the Corps and the County. These facilities, consisting of a swimming beach and a picnic area are now operated and maintained by Harlan County. Recreation investment to date (Corps and Local) is about $100,000. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures operated as required. 9. MIDDLESBORO, CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN, KY Location. At Middlesboro, Ky., on Yellow Creek, a tributary entering Cumberland River about 660 miles above its mouth. Existing project. A system of canals and levees around one side of town, arranged so as to divert most headwaters of Yellow Creek away form present channel through heart of city. Protection is thus afforded in large measure to life and property within business district and a large part of residential section. For project details, see page 1088 of Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work on levees, canals, and appurtenances was accomplished by hired labor. 10. TUG AND LEVISA FORKS OF THE BIG SANDY RIVER AND UPPER CUMBERLAND, WV, VA AND KY Location. The project is located in the State of West Virginia and the Commonwealths of Kentucky and Virginia. The Cumberland portion consists of the Upper Cumberland River Basin, above Cumberland Falls, KY. The basin is approximately 100 miles in length, averaging 30 miles in width at the lower portion and 10 miles in width upstream at Harlan KY. The Big Sandy Basin is within the Huntington District and the Cumberland within the Nashville District. Existing project. Provides for flood control measures for communities in the Tug and Levisa Forks and Upper Cumberland River Basins. The Cumberland portion has been assigned to the Nashville District. Only activities of the Nashville District are reported herein. Estimated Federal cost of new work under jurisdiction of the Nashville District is $394,000,000. The project was authorized by the Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1981, Section 202 of PL 96-367. Local cooperation. Authorizing legislation requires that non-Federal interests shall hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction works and maintain 23-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACIIVITIES, FY 1998 and operate all such works after their completion in accordance with regulations by the Secretary of the Army. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering continued. Various relocation contracts associated with the flood protection project continued. A contract for a diversion of the Cumberland River and levee at Loyall/Rio Vista continued, and a contract for a floodwall and closure structures continued. A contract continued for a levee at Williamsburg, KY. Nonstructural evacuations and floodproofings continued at Harlan Barbourville, Williamsburg and Middlesborough, KY 11. OHIO RIVER BASIN (NASHVILLE DISTRICT) Location. A series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs in Ohio River Basin within Nashville District. Existing project. The general comprehensive plans approved for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin is set forth in legislation listed in Table 23-B. Individual projects, local protection projects and lakes, considered in comprehensive plan within Nashville District are listed in Table 23-K. 12.INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts, requires local interests furnish assurances they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within their respective districts. Maintenance inspections were made during fiscal year of completed protective works in localities transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation. Local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. Fiscal year cost was $11,670. Total cost to September 30, 1998 was $473,466. For project inspection data see table 23-M. 13.FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control and coastal emergencies (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Actual Federal cost for the fiscal year was $247,364 for disaster preparedness. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 14. CENTER HILL LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TN Location. Dam is on Caney Fork River, 26.6 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 309.2) at Carthage, TN. It is in DeKalb County, TN., about 55 miles east of Nashville, and 14 miles southeast of Carthage, TN. Reservoir extends about 64 miles up main stream and about 10 miles up Falling Water River and lies within DeKalb, Putnam, White, and Warren Counties, TN. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production, with a permanent pool for public use and conservation purposes. In addition to main dam structure, provision was made for a rolled-earth dike to close a saddle in reservoir rim near damsite. For further details, see page 1099 of 1962 Annual Report. Actual cost of project including $8,940,642 code 710 funds is $53,412,022. Local cooperation. None required on completed project. Recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structure and its appurtenance maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Total sales energy generated (471,553,000 kwhr) was made available through the Southeastern Power Association to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management involved land management, public relations, and maintenance of public use facilities. Work was completed on replacement of the power plant alarm system. Construction was completed on a comfort station at Long Branch Recreation Area. Dam Safety: $45,442 was expended in FY 98 to pursue RE condemnation activities on two remaining tracts and to document work completed last year. The project stablizes the main dam and increases spillway capacity by addition of an erodible fuse plug embankment just upstream of the primary structure. This allows normal operation of the project up to a 75 percent probable maximum flood (PMF) and erosion of the fuse plug above this level to prevent failure as a result of catastrophic flooding. Remaining RE activities include condemenation at one tract downstream of the fuse plug. The project is fully operational. 15. DALE HOLLOW LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TN AND KY Location. Dam is on Obey River, 7.3 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 380.9) at Celina, TN. It is in Clay County, TN, and about 80 miles northeast of Nashville, TN 28 miles north of Cookeville, TN, and 3 miles east of Celina, TN. Reservoir extends about 51 miles up main stream, 10 miles up East Fork, and 6 miles up West Fork of Obey River, and lies within Cumberland and Clinton Counties, KY, and Clay, Pickett, Overton, and Fentress Counties, TN. Existing project. A concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production with a permanent pool for public use an conservation purposes. See page 23-6 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT 1096 of 1962 Annual Report for project details. Cost of project including $2,195,600 code 710 funds and $150,000 non-Federal funds recreation facilities under the completed projects program is $28,317,746. Local cooperation. None required on completed project; future recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Total sales energy generated (127,810,000 kwhr) was made available through the Southeastern Power Association to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved public relations, and management and maintenance of public-use facilities. Work was completed on replacement of the power plant alarm system. 16.J. PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR, OHIO, RIVER BASIN, TN Location. Damsite is on Stones River, 6.8 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 205.9); in Davidson County, TN.; and about 7 miles east of Nashville, TN. Reservoir extends southeasterly from dam about 32 miles along main stream, 10 miles up East Fork, 6.5 miles up West Fork, and for shorter distances up other tributaries of Stones River; and lies within Davidson, Rutherford, and Wilson Counties, TN. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control, power production and recreation. For further details see page 703 of 1969 Annual Report. Cost of project including $3,260,400 under code 710 funds and $46,000 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program is $56,914,039. Local cooperation. Recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Total sales energy generated (78,202,000 kw-hr) was made available through Southeastern Power Association to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved public relations, fish and wildlife management,and maintenance of public-use facilities. Work continued on the rewind of the power plant generator. 17. LAUREL RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Location. Damsite is at mile 2.3 on Laurel River, a tributary of Cumberland River, in southcentral Kentucky. The two streams meet about 9 miles below Cumberland Falls, a prominent physiographic feature at head of Lake Cumberland which is formed by Wolf Creek Dam. Reservoir extends 19.2 miles upstream to site of Corbin, KY water-supply dam and lies within Laurel and Whitley Counties. Existing project. Project approved in general accordance with recommendations of House Document 413, 86th Congress, by 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended by Public Law 88-253, was designed for purposes of flood control, power, and recreation as an integral unit of a coordinated plan for development of water resources of Cumberland River Basin. With the view of net gain in power potential on a system basis, the plan of improvement incorporated appropriate flood control storage in the proposed project and corresponding adjustment in operations of Wolf Creek Dam - Lake Cumberland for flood control and power, which in effect constituted a transfer of reservoir capacity without entailing a change in flood control benefits. Further detailed study giving full consideration to power capabilities and marketing arrangements indicated the advantage of maintaining present storage allocation at Wolf Creek and use of all available storage capacity of Laurel River Lake for power. The power plant is complete. Recreation was completed in FY 1986. Total cost is $56,741,232. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Total sales energy generated (75,817,000 kw-hr) was made available through Southeastern Power Association for distribution. Construction was completed on a restroom and fishing access at the dam site. 18. WOLF CREEK DAM - LAKE CUMBERLAND, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Location. Wolf Creek Dam is on Cumberland River at mile 460.0 (above mouth) in Russell County, KY, about 10 miles southwest of Jamestown and 12 miles north of Albany, KY. Lake Cumberland extends 101 miles up main stream, 48 miles up South Fork of Cumberland River, in Russell, Clinton, Wayne, Pulaski, McCreary, Laurel, and Whitley Counties, KY. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production, with a permanent pool for public-use and conservation purposes. See page 1094 of 1962 Annual Report for project details. Cost of project is $188,267,195. This cost includes $3,259,372 code 710 funds, $880,000 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed program, and $104,999,237 for major rehabilitation. WRDA 96 authorized a Uprate Project of the hydroelectric powerplant. 23-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1998 Local cooperation. None required on completed pro- and $262,569 for Flood Control Projects (Metro Center ject; future recreation development subject to certain con- Levee and East Ridge). ditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Activity involving the integrity of the structure began in 1968 when a leak or seepage developed in the embankment. The major rehab embankment contract was physically completed in September 1982. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Total sales energy generated (901,458,000 kw-hr) was made available through Southeastern Power Association to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved land management activities, public relations, and maintenance of public-use facilities. Work was completed on replacement of the power plant alarm system, replacement of the power plant generator leads, and replacement of ceiling tiles and lighting in the power plant. General Investigations 19. SURVEYS Costs for this period were $716,224 for which $168,185 was for Navigation Studies, $55,281 for Flood Damage Prevention Studies, $3,790 for Shoreline Protection Studies, $328,390 for Special Studies, $71,533 for Miscellaneous Activities and $89,045 for Coordination With Other Agencies and Non-Federal Interests. 20.COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for this period were $139,177 for which $99,187 was for floodplain management services and $39,990 for General Hydrologic Studies. 21. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Costs for this period were $389,878 for which $111,659 was for Watershed/Ecosystem Projects (Black Fox/Oakland Springs), $15,650 for Navigation Projects (Kentucky Lock) 23-8 NASHVIILE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 23-A See Section in Text Project 1. Cumberland River TN and KY 2. Kentucky Lock TN and KY 3. Tennessee River, TN, AL, and KY 4. Tenn.-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS 7. Big South Fork National River and Rec. Area, KY and TN 8. Martins Fork Lake, KY 9. Middlesboro, Cumberland River Basin, KY 10. Tug & Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy & Cumberland River, WV, VA and KY 14. Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN 15. Dale Hollow Lake Ohio River Basin, TN and KY 16. J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN 17. Laurel RiverLake, Ohio River Basin, KY COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT FNew Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - - 53,412,02214 - - - 53,412,02215 4,812,000 5,039,000 4,770,000 4,163,000 93,941,876 16 4,815,135 5,016,033 4,851,338 4,005,131 93,677,773 17 S- - - 28,317,74618 -- - - 28,317,74619 3,943,000 3,895,000 4,206,000 3,669,000 83,041,027 20 3,949,667 3,940,177 4,180,726 3,734,697 82,997,022 21 - - - 56,914,03922 - - - 56,914,03923 3,739,000 3,392,000 4,160,000 3,300.000 64,347,651 24 3,977,040 3,392,833 3,805,105 3,771,642 64,310,446 25 - - - 56,741,232 - - - 56,741,232 1,649,000 1,501,000 1,283,000 1,166,000 20,774,943 26 1,620,747 1,244,690 1,574,973 1,167,224 20,725,985 26 23-9 Total to FY 95 FY 96 FY97 FY98 Sep 30, 1998 320,252,2401,2,3 - - - - 320,252,2401,2,3 23,203,955 24,045,808 23,354,000 21,372,000 444,200,9264 23,412,171 23,823,240 23,798,538 21,241,148 422,182,6105 2,000,006 2,000,000 2,726,000 3,957,000 13,183,000 1,843,065 2,253,535 2,784,980 3,856,189 13,065,50 - - - - 16,251,428 6 - - - - 16,251,428 6 12,840,000 14,185,000 13,053,000 13,023,000 277,397,048 7 12,983,789 14,059,643 12,996,888 13,187,838 277,075,732 8 - - - - 400,000 - - - - 400,000 -100,00 0 0 0 749,013,050 61,759 17,704 0 0 749,013,050 -200,000 -75,000 0 0 112,588,920 9 6,912 55,402 81,775 -41,469 112,502,512 10 -- - - 20,479,911 -- - - 20,479,911 714,000 762,000 785,000 562,000 10,808,340 601,498 883,715 767,093 581,314 10,778,978 - - - 817,830 11 - - - 817,830 11 30,000 60,000 38,000 48,000 2,355,166 53,525 56,803 42,402 35,430 2,342,471 25,158,000 18,462,026 25,523,000 27,986,000 316,244,526 12 26,818,757 26,051,806 23,048,466 20,452,349 300,063,244 13 i . � � _ o REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1998 TABLE 23-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY98 Sep 30, 1998 18. Wolf Creek Dam and New Work Lake Cumberland, Approp. - - - - 83,267,95827 Ohio River Basin, KY Cost 83,267,95827 Maint. Approp. 4,944,000 5,036,000 7,676,000 8,974,346 120,186,07928 Cost 4,965,926 5,104,269 7,374,806 7,831,643 118,624,28529 Rehab. Approp - - - - 104,999,237 1. Includes $9,707,354 for abandoned and/or replaced works under the old Cumberland River system. (Amount includes $826,253 for new work and $3,266,706 for maintenance on previous project.) 2. Includes $61,733 public works acceleration funds, and $102,966 contriubted by the State of Kentucky and $6,750 contributed by metropolitan Nashville, TN. 3. Includes $298,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 4. Includes $955,889 for special recreation use fees, and $2,628,257 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $1,892,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 5. Includes $955,889 for special recreation use fees, and $2,628,257 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $1,892,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 6. Includes $14,007,193 for new work and excludes $4,005,175 for maintenance on previous projects. 7. Includes $495,763 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $764,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 8. Includes $495,763 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $764,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 9. Includes $300,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 10. Includes $300,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 11. Includes $33,876 Emergency Relief Funds. 12. Includes $20,566,026 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 13. Includes $19,795,105 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 14. Includes $35,896 public works acceleration funds, and $148,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 15. Includes $35,896 public works acceleration funds, and $148,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 16. Includes $292,280 funds for special recreation use fees, and $1,083,678 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $91,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 17. Includes $292,280 funds for special recreation use fees, and $1,083,678 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $91,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 18. Includes $51,789 public works funds and $150,000 contributed by the State of Tennessee, and $341,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 19. Includes $51,789 public works funds and $150,000 contributed by the State of Tennessee, and $341,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 20. Includes $339,480 funds for special recreation use fees, and $1,083,678 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $482,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 21. Includes $1,083,678 funds for special recreation use fees, and $884,178 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $482,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 22. Includes $46,000 contributed by the Metropolitan Government, Nashville, TN. 23. Includes $46,000 contributed by the Metropolitan Government, Nashville, TN. 24. Includes $260,680 for special recreation use fees, and $1,226,978 for maintenance and operations of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $40,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 25. Includes $260,680 for special recreation use fees, and $1,226,978 for maintenance and operations of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $40,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 26. Includes $66,678 for maintenance and operations of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 27. Includes $96,920 public works acceleration funds, and $880,000 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 28. Includes $82,048 public works acceleration funds, and $198,578 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $278,780 funds for special recreation use fees, and $293,000 fund provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 29. Includes $82,048 public works acceleration funds, and $198,578 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $278,780 funds for special recreation use fees, and $293,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 30. Includes $203,757 for claim paid on initial construction of switchyard. 23-10 TABLE 23 See Section In Text 1. 1. 3. -B Date of Authodaed Act Jul 13, 1892 Jun 25, 1910 Aug 30, 1935 Jul 24, 1946 Jun 19, 1952 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul 14, 1960 Oct 12, 1996 Aug. 5, 1886 Mar 2, 1907 Mar 2, 1919 Jun 5, 1920 Jul 3, 1930 Jun 26, 19342 Jul 24, 1946 Oct 1, 1980 Oct 17, 1996 Oct 12, 1996 Jul 3, 1930 May 18, 1933 Oct 12, 1996 Authorized flood damage reduction by nonstructure methods in Hamilton County, TN. 23-11 NASHVILE, TN, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized CUMBERIAND RIVER BEIOW NASHVIILE Provision made for lock A Provision made for locks B to F, and for dredging below lock F. Repairing dams A to F, inclusive, and surmounting same with movable crests Provision of 9-foot channel by the construction of 3 moderate height dams below Nashville, via, Kuttawa (Eureka), Dover, and Cheatham. Provision for hydroelectric power production as a function of Cheatham Dam. Construction of Barkley (Lower Cumberland) dam and reservoir project for navigation, flood control, hydroelectric power, and related purposes in lieu of Kuttawa and Dover navigation-only structures. Authorized change in alignment of Illinois Central Railroad. Authorized construction of Kentucky Lock for navigation only. CUMBERIAND RIVER ABOVE NASHVIILE Provision made for locks and dams; the Secretary of War to determine the final plan of improvement. Dimensions of the locks fixed in accordance with reports of Mar. 30, 1887, and Nov. 25, 1890. Adoption of the report of the Board of Engineers, dated Feb. 26, 1906, limiting the lock and dam construction to locks and dams 1 to 7, and 21. Provision made for locks and dams 8 to 17. Authorizes work to proceed in Tennessee without waiting for action of local interests in Kentucky. Raising dam 1, 3 feet. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Construction of Old Hickory, Cordell Hull (Carthage), and Celina Dams above Nashville for navigation and the development of power resources. Design and construct flood control measures for communities in the Upper Cumberland River basins. Authorized ecosystem restoration at three wetlands and historic sites in Murfresboro, TN. Authorized hydropower update at Wolf Creek Dam TENNESSEE RIVER Authorized navigable depth of 9 feet from mouth about 650 miles to Knoxville, Tennessee to be obtained by construction of low dams. Authorized TVA to construct such dams in the Tennessee River as will provide a 9 foot channel. Documents Annual Report, 1890, p. 2151 H. Docs. 758, 60th Cong., 1st sess.; and 1481, 60th Cong., 2d sess. 1 H. Doc. 38, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 761, 79th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc 81, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 56, 86th Cong., 2d sess. WRDA 96 Annual Report 1884, p. 1663 Annual Report 1888, p. 1622, and Annual Report 1892, p. 1933. H. Doc. 699, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 63d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26, 70th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 761, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 202, PL 96-367 WRDA 96 WRDA 96 H. Doc. 328, 71st Cong., 2d sess. WRDA 96 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1998 TABLE 23-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Authorized Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 11. WRDA 96 WRDA 96 Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 761, 75th Cong., 3d sess. Oct 12, 1996 Oct 12, 1996 Aug 28, 1937 Jun 28, 1938 Authorized a study for a bank stabilzation project on the Tennessee River in Hamilton County, TN. Authorized assistance to non-Federal interests for enviromental activities in Jackson County, AL. OHIO RIVER BASIN, NASHVILLE DISTRICT Construct levees, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin. Project to be selected by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction. Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable at discretion of Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers and for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75million for reservoirs and $50,300,000 for local flood protection works. Additional $45 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin. Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Authorized Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, KY and TN. Total area not to exceed 125,000 acres. Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY Construction of waterway to connect above rivers and provide a 9 foot channel and minimum bottom width of 170 feet in river and canal sections and 150 feet in the divide cut, with locks 110 by 600 feet clear inside dimensions. Subsequent studies determined most practical plan consists of channel with bottom width of 300 feet (280 feet in divide cut), fewer locks with higher lifts resulted in reducing number of lifts from 18 to 10 and reduced length from 260 to 253 miles. 1. Contains latest published maps. Included in Public Works Administration program Sept. 6, 1933. 2. Permanent Appropriation Repeal Act. 23-12 H. Doc. 762, 77th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 506, 78th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 6755, 89th Cong., 1st sess. S. 3710, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. R. 15166 91st Cong., 2d sess. H. R. 10203 93rd Cong. Water Resources Develop. Act of 1974 Amended by PL 94-587, 94th Cong. H. R. 10203 93rd Cong. River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974. H. Doc. 486, 79th Cong. 2d sess. Page 1343, Part I, FY 1968 House Hearings Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Jul 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Dec 30, 1963 Jun 18, 1965 Aug 13, 1968 Jun 19, 1970 Mar 7, 1974 Mar 7, 1974 4. Jul 24, 1946 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 23-C Proect Caney Fork River, TN Clinch River, TN and VA Duck River, TN Elk River, AL and TN French Broad and Little Pigeon Rivers, TN Holston River, TN Little Tennessee River, TN Obey River, TN Red River, TN South Fork of Cumberland River, KY OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (All Projects not Specifically Identified in Text) For last Pull Report see Status Annual Report Constru abandoned 1895 $ 27,t abandoned 1923 53,! abandoned 1887 13,( abandoned 1904 4,( abandoned abandoned abandoned abandoned abandoned abandoned 1931 1911 1888 1887 1884 1892 Cost to Sept, 1998 ction Maintenance 828 949 $ 7,873 000 000 249,605 5,714 5,510 11,500 5,000 11,967 33,554 TABLE 23-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECIS (All Projects not Specifically Identified in Text) For last Full C Report see nstto Project Status Annual Report Construction Maintenance Barbourville, KY completed 1963 $2,088,147 Coal Creek and Tributaries (Lake City), TN completed 1962 460,134 Corbin (Lynn Camp Creek), KY completed 1969 567,703 Middlesboro (Yellow Creek), KY completed 1949 26,309 Paint Rock River, AL completed 1967 544,173 Pineville, KY completed 1963 1,679,126 1. Includes $9,950 contributed funds. 23-13 St,1998 OpuafiijioP REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1998 Project Status Barkley Dam and Lake beneficial use Barkley, KY and TN Celina Dam, KY inactive Cheatham Lock and Dam, TN beneficial use Cordell Hull Lock and Dam, TN beneficial use Old Hickory Lock and Dam, TN beneficial use Annual Reoort Constru $154,048,52 OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS (Including Power) For last Full Co Report see 222,575 31,682,762 101,276,689 2 79,874,492 69,207,444 2 52,266,412 114,687,473 2 1. Includes $7,549,878 cost for Cross Creek. 2. Details given under "Cumberland River, TN and KY" See Table 23-H TABLE 23-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For last Full Federal Contributed Report see Funds Funds Project Annual Report Date and Authority Expended Expended Three Islands Reservoir, 1970 Authorized: FC Act 1938, PL 761, $111,855 Ohio River Basin, TN 75 Cong., 3rd sess.; FC Act 1946, PL 525, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Deauthorized: 5 Aug 1977. Middlesboro, Yellow Creek - Authorized: FC Act, Dec 22, Bell County, KY 1944, PL 534, 78th Congress. Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Cumberland River above Authorized: River & Harbor Act, Nashville, TN Aug 5, 1886. Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Hiwassee River, Polk and 1923 Authorized: River & Harbor Act 123,065 Bradley Counties, TN Aug 14, 1876. Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Rossview Lake, Tennessee - Authorized: FC Act, Jan 28, 1938, 6,779 and Kentucky PL 76175th Congress. Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Celina Lake, Kentucky Authorized: Rivers and harbors and Tennessee Act of 1946. PL 79-522. Deauthorized: July 9, 1995, Section 1001 (B) (2) of PL 99-662. 23-14 TABLE 23-F st to Sept. 1998 Operation and tion Maintenance !2 1 $44,200,841 2 - NASHVILLE, TN, DISIRICT TABLE 23-H CUMBERLAND RIVER, TN AND KY: PRINCIPAL FEATURES (See Section 1 of Text) Dam and Reservoir Barkley Cheatam Old Hickory Cordell Hull Nearest town Miles above mouth of ver Lock dimensions (feet)' Lift at normal pool levels (feet) Depths on guard-sills at minimum pool levels (feet) Character of foundation Darn: Type Height Length, exclusive of lock section (feet) Spillway: Gross length (feet) Net length opening (feet) Crest gates: Type Number Size (feet) Operating levels at dam (feet, mean sea level): Maximum regulated Normal operation: Full pool Minimum pool Minimum pool in advance of floods Reservoir area (acres) Reservoir capacity (acre-feet): Flood control Power drawdown Dead storage Total Canel: Length (mile) Bottom width (feet) Depth a minimum pool level (feet) Power development: Number of units Generator rating (kilowatts) Total installation (kilowatts) Percent of project completion Year opened to navigation Cost9 Kuttawa, KY 11 miles. 30.6 110 by 800 57 11, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 157 9,959 804 660 Tainter 12 55 by 60 375 359 354 346 93,430 1,213,0003,4 259,000 610,000 2,082,00 1.75 400 11 4 32,500 130,000 8 1964 $154,048,522 10 1. Clear width and length available for full width. 2. Exclusive of lock section. 3. Surcharge. 4. Normal operation (elev. 375-359) during nonflood season; flood control allowance to be increased to 1,472,000 acre-feet (elev. 375-354) during season of major floodflows. 5. Surcharge storage 6. During flood season (elev. 508-501); minimum 51,800 acrefeet (elev. 508-504) with normal operation during non-flood season. 7. Daily pondage allowance; run-of-river project. 8. Completed for full beneficial use. 9. Includes recreation facility costs. 10. Includes $7,549,878 cost for Cross Creek. 23-15 Ashland City, TN, 9 miles 148.7 110 by 800 26 14, upper; 17, lower Rock Concrete gravity 75 800 480 420 Tainter 7 60 by 27 Old Hickory TN, 3 miles 216.2 84 by 400 60 14, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete gravand 98 3,6052 325 270 Tainter 6 45 by 41 4503 Carthage, TN 5 miles 313.5 84 by 400 59 14, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete riand 93 1,1382 291 225 Tainter 5 45 by 41 5083 508 501 499 13,920 85,6005,6 20,500 204,800 310,900 385 382 7,450 19,8007 84,200 104,000 442 27,450 125,0005 63,000 357,000 545,000 3 12,000 36,000 1952 $31,682,762 4 25,000 100,000 8 1952 $52,266,412 3 33,333 100,000 8 1973 $79,874,492 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY OF CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1998 TABLE 23-I TENNESSEE RIVER (SEE SECTION 2 OF TEXT) IJck Dimensto Inagth Minim Depth Width Avail- ift on Guard Sils of able for Chann- FUll Noy- Maxber Wkidth mail n ower Upper Character of (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Foundalon Year Naviatin Cost of Kind Type of Each Iock of Dan Constnucton and Damn Kentucky Pickwick Landing: Auxiliary lock Main lock Wilson: Auxiliary lock Main lock General Joe Wheeler: Auxiliary lock Main lock Guntersville: Auxiliary lock Main lock Nickajack: Auxiliary lock Main lock Chickamauga Watts Bar Fort Loudon Melton Hill (cinch R.) 22.4 0.5 above Gilbertsville, KY 206.7 4.4 above Hamburg, TN 206.7 4.4 above Hamburg, TN 259.4 2.9 above Florence, AL 259.4 2.9 above Florence, AL 274.9 18.4 above Florence, AL 274.9 18.4 above Florence, AL 349.0 9.1 below Guntersville, AL 349.0 9.1 below Guntersville, AL 424.7 39.4 below Chattanooga, TN 424.7 39.4 below Chattanooga, TN 471.0 6.9 above Chattanooga, TN 529.9 6.8 above Breedenton, TN 602.3 1.3 above Lenoir City, TN 23.1 22.1 above Kingston, TN 110 600 56 73.3 12.7 11.0 Limestone 110 600 55 63.0 12.8 10.0 Limestone 110 1000 55 63.0 12.8 10.0 Limestone 60 292 94 100.0 11.04 11.2 Limestone 300 110 600 94 100.0 13.0 13.0 Limestone 60 400 48 51.5 13.2 14.7 Limestone 110 600 48 51.5 13.0 13.0 Limestone 60 360 39 45.0 11.8 13.0 Limestone 110 600 39 45.0 12.7 13.0 Limestone 110 600 39 41.0 13.0 13.0 Limestone 110 800 39 41.0 13.0 13.0 Limestone 60 360 49 53.0 13.0 10.0 Limestone 60 360 58 70.0 11.8 12.0 Shale 60 360 72 80.0 11.8 12.0 Limestone 75 400 54 60.0 13.0 13.0 Limestone 1942 Fixed Concrete and earthfill 1937 Fixed Concrete and earthfill 1984 Fixed Concrete and earthfill 1927 1959 2 Fixed Concrete and $46,973,5405 earthfill 7 1934 Fixed Concrete and 1,796,2956 earthfill 1963 Fixed Concrete and 7 earthfill 1937 Fixed 1965 Fixed 1967 Fixed Fixed 1939 Fixed 1941 Fixed Concrete and earthfill Concrete Concrete Concrete and earthfill 1943 Fixed Concrete and earthfill 1963 Fixed Concrete 3&7 7 77 3&7 3 4th Cong., 1st sess). 23-16 Miles Ps~cd Month 1 Miles frm Neasest Town 1. H. Doc. 328, 71 Cong., 2d sess, contains table, pp. 98 and 99, givg pertinent information concerning low darns contemplated under 5. Constructed by the Corps under authority of sec. 124, Natioal Defense Act of June 3, 1916, (H. Doc. 1262, 64 1930 pro.ect Annual Report for 1938, pp. 1218 and 1219, contains siniar information pertain g to low dams in addition to existing locks Actual cost of lock and clam. and dams, including those constructed or under construction by Tennessee Valley Authority. 6. Actual cost of lock only as constructed by the Corps; dams constructed by Tennessee Valey Authority. 2. Lock and dam constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. 7. Constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. 3. Lock and dam constructed by Tennessee Valley Authorty. Design for lock prepared with Corps forces and funds. 4. Tailwater in canal; flight of 2 locks. _ NASHVIILE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 23-J TENNESSEE RIVER, TN, AL, AND KY TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEP 30, 1998 (See Section 3 of Text) Channel Operation & Punds New Work Maintenaoce Maintenance Total Regular $2,244,2361,2 $15,065,331 $261,998,731 $279,308,298 Maintenance - 11,665 11,665 Increase of compen- - 5 5 sation, rivers and harbors, 1919 (certified claims) Total $2,244,2361,2 $15,065,336 $262,010,396 $279,319,968 1. In addition, surplus property valued at $54,336 was trans- and care of works of improvement under provisions of appropriaferred from the project without reimbursement. Excludes tion for such purposes. $4,005,175 expended betweenl890 and June 30, 1935, on operation 2. Excludes $14,007,192 previous construction cost. TABLE 23-K OHIO RIVER BASIN (NASHVILLE DISTRICT) LOCAL PROTECION PROJECIS Type of Estimated Cost Location Protection Federal Non-Federal Total Cumberland, KY Channel Improvement 520,000 240,000 760,000 1 TABLE 23-L RESERVOIRS Total Federal Tributary Basin and Reservoir Steam Cost Center Hill Lake Caney Fork 53,412,0221 Dale Hollow Lake, TN and KY Obey River 28,167,7461 J. Percy Priest Dam & Reservoir, TN Stones River 56,868,0391,2 Laurel River Lake, KY Laurel River 56,741,232 3 Martins Fork Lake, KY Martins Fork 20,479,911 1. Details of this project are in individual report. 2. Formerly Stewarts Ferry Reservoir. 3. See "Other authorized multiple-purpose projects." 23-17 TABLE 23-M INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 10 of Text) Project Date of Inspection Barbourville, KY Oct 1997 - Apr 1998 Corbin, KY Oct 1997 - Apr 1998 Lake City, TN Oct 1997 - Apr 1998 Middlesboro, KY (Yellow Creek) Oct 1997 - Apr 1998 Middlesboro, KY (Diversion Canal) Oct 1997 - Apr 1998 Pineville, KY Oct 1997 - Apr 1998 Spring City, TN Nov 1997 - Apr 1998 Sunbright, TN (Whiteoak Creek) Oct 1997- Apr 1998 TABLE 23-N FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Fbod Control activities pursuant to Section 205 P.L 858, 80th Congress, as amended Project FY 98 Cost Section 205 Coordination Account $12,593 Clark Spring Branch, Decatur, AL 103,506 Muscle Shoals, AL 424,940 Sinking Creek,Murfreesboro, TN 26,019 First Creek, Knoxville, TN 13,553 Dallas Branch, Huntsville, AL 32,940 Huntsville Spring Branch, AL 217,401 Emily Ave / Tim. St, TN 38,800 Rchland Creek, Morgantown, TN 57,662 Doe River, Carter Co, TN 31,354 Lick Creek, Clinch Riv, Russel, Co, VA 24,173 Beason Creek, Adamsville, TN 4,188 Mud Creek, Hendersonville, NC 15,250 Bya nk Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 SControl Act, PL. 526, 79th Congress) Project FY 98 Cost Section 14 Coordination Account South Holston River, Kingsport, TN Sequoyah Park, Knoxville, TN Clinch River, RT 58, Kingston, TN Ditto Landing, Huntsville, AL Tennessee River, Mile 645-647.3 Cumberland River, Mile 193.0-197.5 Clifton, Wayne Co., TN Ross's Landing, Chattanooga, TN Tennessee River, UT Experiment Station, Knoxville, TN Clarksville Fairground Erin Water Treatment Plant Chattanooga Interceptor Sewerline Tennessee Riverpark - Frye Fish Center Beaver Creek, Bristol, TN Mousetail Landing State Park, TN Loudon County Municipal Facilities, TN French Broad River, Water Treatment Plant N. Chickamausa Creek, Dayton Pike Bridge $11,727 58,491 -5,032 365 146,768 8,379 56,843 12,097 338,791 -10,254 421,430 15,245 326,190 407,752 58,430 49,059 7,900 45,124 489 $1,938,067 23-18 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT * This district encompasses southwestern Ohio, all of Central Kentucky and portions of western and eastern Kentucky, the southern 3/4 of Indiana, and southeastern Illinois, all included in the drainage basin of the Ohio River and its tributaries (exclusive of Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers) from mile 438 (below Pittsburgh) immediately upstream from Foster, KY., to the mouth of the Ohio. All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation - Channels and Habors Page 1. Open Channel Work, Licking River, KY ...... 24-2 Navigation - Locks and Dams 2. Construction of Locks and Dams, Ohio River ............................. .................................. 24-2 3. Green and Barren Rivers, KY .................... 24-2 4. Kentucky River, KY ................................... 24-2 5. Open Channel Work, Ohio River ............... 24-3 6. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ......... 24-3 7. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization...... .......... ............ ......... .......... 24-3 Flood Control - Local Protection 8. Duck Creek, OH ......................................... 24-3 9. Frankfort, South Frankfort, KY ................. 24-3 10. Holes Creek, OH ......................................... 24-4 11. Mill Creek, OH ..................................... 24-4 12. Ohio River Flood Protection ....................... 24-4 13. Pond Creek, KY ..................................... 24-5 14. Salyersville, KY ..................................... 24-5 15. Southwestern Jefferson County, KY ............ 24-5 16. Southern & Eastern, KY ............................ 24-6 17. Wabash River, New Harmony, IN ................ 24-6 18. White River, Indianapolis Central Waterfront, IN .............................. 24-6 Flood Control - Reservoirs 19. Barren River Lake, KY .............................. 24-7 20. Brookville Lake, KY ...................................... 24-7 21. Buckhorn Lake, KY .................................... 24-7 22. Caesar Creek Lake, OH ............................. 24-7 23. Cagles Mill Lake, IN .................................. 24-8 24. Carr Creek Lake, KY ................................. 24-8 25. Cave Run Lake, KY .................................... 24-8 26. Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN .......................... 24-9 27. Clarence J. Brown Dam & Reservoir, OH .... 24-9 28. Green River Lake, KY ................................ 24-9 29. J. Edward Roush Lake, IN....................... 24-10 30. Mississinewa Lake, IN ............................. 24-10 31. Monroe Lake, IN ...................................... 24-10 32. Nolin Lake, KY ......................................... 24-11 33. Ohio River Basin (Louisville District) ........ 24-11 Page 34. Patoka Lake, IN ....................................... 24-11 35. Rough River Lake and Channel Improvement, KY ..................................... 24-12 36. Salamonie Lake, IN ............................... 24-12 37. Taylorsville Lake, KY .................................. 24-13 38. Wabash River Basin ................................. 24-13 39. West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH ............. 24-13 40. William H. Harsha Lake, OH .................. 24-14 41. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .............................. 24-14 42. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects... 24-14 43. Flood Control Works Under Special Authorization........................................ 24-14 General Investigations 44. Surveys ..................................... 24-15 45. Precontruction Engineering and Design .... 24-15 46. Coordinattion with other Agencies ............. 24-15 47. Collection and Study of Basic Data ............. 24-15 Tables Table 24-A Cost and Financial Statement .... 24-16 Table 24-B Authorizing Legislation .............. 24-21 Table 24-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............... ................... 24-24 Table 24-D Not applicable Table 24-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........................................ 24-25 Table 24-F Not applicable Table 24-G Deauthorized Projects .............. 24-27 Table 24-H Principal Features of Green and Barren Rivers and Kentucky River Navigation Systems ........ 24-29 Table 24-I Ohio River Basin - Total Cost of Basin Plan ............................ 24-30 Table 24-J Wabash River Basin - Total Cost of Basin Plan .................... 24-34 Table 24-K Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ........................ 24-34 Table 24-L Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ........................ 24-37 Table 24-M General Investigations ................ 24-39 24-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Navigation - Channels and Harbors 1. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, LICKING RIVER, KY Location. The Licking River originates in southeast ern Kentucky and flows generally northwesterly to its confluence with the Ohio River at Covington, KY, mile 470.2 below Pittsburgh, PA. The Licking River Basin includes the drainage area of the Licking River, and all other left bank tributaries of the Ohio River from Markland Locks and Dam (Ohio River Mile 531.5) upstream to Meldahl Locks and Dam (Ohio River Mile 436.2). Existing project. There are no locks and dams on the Licking River. However, a navigable depth of 9 feet is maintained up to mile 7.0 on the Licking River. Local cooperation. None. Terminal facilities. Facilities for bulk commodities, oil products, and coal are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Dredging was done where required to provide an adequate and dependable channel. Navigation - Locks and Dams 2. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER For report on this improvement, see the heading under Ohio River. 3. GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY Location. Green River rises in Casey County, KY, flows northwesterly 370 miles, and empties into the Ohio River about 8 miles above Evansville, IN. Barren River rises in Monroe County, KY, flows northwesterly 130 miles, and empties into Green River 1/2 mile above Lock 4 and 149.5 miles above the mouth of Green River. Existing project. Six locks and dams on Green River and one on Barren River to provide, were constructed in pools of dams, a navigable depth of 9 feet and width of 200 feet from the Ohio River to mile 103 Green River, 3.2 miles upstream from Paradise, KY and a navigable depth of 5.5 feet from mile 103 Green River to Mammoth Cave, KY, mile 197.8 Green River, and from mouth of Barren River mile 149.5 Green River, to Bowling Green, KY, mile 30.1, Barren River. Of these facilities, only Green River L&D 1 and 2 are still operational. Green River L&D 3, 4, 5, 6 and Barren River L&D 1 are maintained by the Corps in a caretaker status. Fluctuations in stage vary considerably at different locks. At Lock 3, Green River, ordinary high stages are from 12 to 15 feet above pool level, and at Lock 1, Barren River, from 7 to 10 feet above pool. Maximum stages of record are 34 feet above normal pool stage at Lock 3, Green River, and 29 feet at Lock 1, Barren River, obtained during floods of 1937 and 1913, respectively. (See Table 24-B for authorizing legislation and Table 24-H for principal features of the locks and dams.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Coal handling facilities located on the Green River between miles 81.5 and 108.1 near South Carrollton, Rockport, Paradise and Rochester, Kentucky, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Consisted of operation and maintenance of Locks and Dams 1 and 2 and Green River. Maintenance of fencing at the properties of Green River L&D 3, 4, 5, and 6 and Barren River L&D 1. A mooring facility at Green River L&D 3 is also maintained. Condition at end of fiscal year. Locks and Dams 1 and 2, Green River, are in good condition. Dam 3 on the Green and Dam 1 on the Barren are in fair condition and the locks at those locations are in poor condition. Lock 4, Green River, is in poor condition. Dam 4, Green River, failed May 24, 1965, when 120 feet washed out. Breach later widened, and repairs have been permanently deferred. Pool of Dam 1, Barren River, is maintained for local small boat use, but navigation through lock is suspended because of loss of lower pool. Operation activity was discontinued at Lock 4 Green River and Lock and Dam 1 Barren River in January 1974 and at Lock 3, Green River in September 1981. The residences and associated buildings and certain real estate at Lock 4 Green River and Lock and Dam 1 Barren River were disposed of in January 1975. Operation of Locks 5 and 6, Green River, was discontinued August 1951, as they were no longer used by river traffic. Controlling project depth in lower 103 miles of Green Riveris 9feet; controlling depth from mile 103 to Bowling Green, KY, is 5.5 feet. Channel of Green River above Lock 3 is no longer maintained. 4. KENTUCKY RIVER, KY Location. Formed by confluence of its North and Middle Forks about 4 miles east of Beattyville in east central Kentucky, (South Fork joins the main stream at that location), flows northwesterly and empties into Ohio River at Carrollton, KY, mile 545.8 below Pittsburgh, PA. Existing project. Provides for 14 locks and fixed dams to give, in connection with improvement of Ohio River, slack water navigation of 6 feet minimum depth from Ohio River to places on the three forks that are short distances above Beattyville, KY. Length of 6-footdepth project on main stem of Kentucky River is 258.6 miles to confluence of Middle and North Forks. Cost of completed new work is $4,176,749. River frequently rises to 35 feet or higher. Extreme height at Lock 1 due to flood backwater from Ohio River is 60.3 feet, while extreme floods reach height of 47.6 feet at Lock 4, and 35.5 feet at Lock 14. At some intermediate locks extreme height of floods exceeds 40 feet. All flood heights refer to upper pool gages. Existing project was adopted by 1879 River and Harbor Act (H. Ex. Doc. 47, 45* Cong., 3d Sess., and Annual Report, 1879, p. 1398). Operation and care of locks and dams were included in project July 1, 1935, under provision of Permanent Appropriations 24-2 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. (See Table 24-H for principal features of the locks and dams.) On December 19, 1976, the lock operation schedules for commercial traffic and recreational craft on the Kentucky River System were reduced from continuous 24-hour year-round operation to two-shift year-round operation of Locks 1 through 4, intermittent daily operation of Locks 5 through 10, and intermittent operation five days weekly of Locks 11 through 14. Since that time the hours for operation of Locks 5 through 14 have been reduced in several increments. On October 1, 1981, Locks 5 through 14 were closed to traffic and placed.in caretaker status. Locks 5, 6, 8, 9, and 10 were in operation for 15 weekends during fiscal year 1982 and closed at the end of this period. Locks 5 through 14 were leased to the Commonwealth of Kentucky on May 21, 1985. The Commonwealth of Kentucky operated these locks on weekends during the summer boating seasons through the Fiscal Year. The lease expired on October 15, 1989, and Locks 5 through 14 were closed to traffic and placed in caretaker status. The Commonwealth of Kentucky continued operation again under a lease agreement signed in 1990 with several extensions that allow the Commonwealth to operate the Locks until 2019. The Corps continues to operate Locks 1 through 4 on a twoshift, year-round operation. In Fiscal Year 1993 the Corps began repairs to dams 5 through 14 in preparation for transfer to the Commonwealth. Dam repairs were physically completed in fiscal Year 1998. In December 1996 the Assistant Secretary of the Army (CW) signed the quitclaim transfer deed for Lock and Dam 10 for direct transfer from the Corps to the Commonwealth. The Corps continues efforts to transfer Locks and Dam 5-9 and 11-14 to the Commonwealth. Licenses. Federal Regulatory Commission License No. 539, to Kentucky Utilities Co., at Dam 7, Kentucky River, Annual charge, $4,400; total collections through September 30, 1998, $332,805. Terminal facilities. Facilities for bulk commodities are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Consisted of operation and maintenance of Locks and Dams 1 through 4 and removal of shoals, snags, and slides as required to maintain an adequate channel for existing traffic between mouth of river and Dam 5 at mile 82.2 Kentucky River. Maintenance on Dam 4 stabilization was started. Projected to be complete in FY 99. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1917. Work accomplished was rehabilitation of the five old State locks and dams and construction of new Locks and Dams 6 to 14 inclusive. Repairs have been made to deteriorated locks and dams as required to keep locks in operation and maintain pool levels above dams except in extreme dry weather, when some pools fall below normal levels, details in Annual Reports for 1963, 1964, and 1965. Channel work was performed as required to provide for existing river traffic. Controlling navigable depth in length of river covered by existing project was 6 feet at end of fiscal year. 5. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER For report on this improvement, see this heading under Ohio River. 6. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 24-C. 7. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION None. Flood Control - Local Protection 8. DUCK CREEK, OH Location. The project area is located in the City of Cincinnati and the Village of Fairfax in Hamilton County, Ohio. The project encompasses 3.2 miles of the stream and begins approximately 2 miles upstream of the confluence of Duck Creek with the Little Miami River. Existing project. The project consists of approximately 7,100 feet of concrete flood wall, 3,300 feet of earth levee, 8,500 feet of riprapped stream bank, 1,200 feet of channel relocation, 1,100 feet of culvert, demolition of an abandoned highway bridge, widening of a railroad bridge, a pump station, and automatic road closure, and an emergency access road. Estimated cost of new work (1998) is $17,208,000 of which $12,906,000 is Federal and $4,302,000 is non-Federal. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. Local cooperation. The non-Federal sponsors are the City of Cincinnati and the Village of Fairfax. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed in December 1997. Operations during fiscal year. Work this year includes real estate acquisition and completion of plans and specification on two phases. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is about 15 percent complete overall with design approximately 50 percent complete. 9. FRANKFORT, SOUTH FRANKFORT, KY Location. The project area of South Frankfort lies along the south bank of the Kentucky River in Frankfort, KY, Franklin County in the Bluegrass Region of central Kentucky. Existing Project. The project consists of approximately 3,811 feet of concrete floodwall and earthen levee, interior pumping facilities, and bank protection; and, will provide protection to 390 properties in South Frankfort. The Kentucky River drains an area of about 6,966 square miles in the central part of Kentucky and empties into the Ohio River at mile 545.8. Cost of new 24-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 work (1998) is $11,164,720, of which $8,373,540 is Federal, and $2,791,180 is non-Federal. The project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1938, as modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1990. Local Cooperation. The non-Federal cost sharing partner is the City of Frankfort, Kentucky. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed in July 1993 and the City has completed all necessary real estate acquisition. They have provided all necessary financial contribution pending final audit. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Work on the second construction contract for 1,250 feet of floodwall and the 150 cfs pump station was completed in FY 96 .Work on the final contract for the remaining 2561 feet of protection was completed in FY 98. The Project is complete. Maintenance: During the 1998 flood season, no benefits were realized. 10. HOLES CREEK, OH Location. Project area is located on Holes Creek in West Carrollton, Montgomery County, Ohio. West Carrollton is situated in the southwestern portion of Ohio and is a suburb of Dayton. Holes Creek drains 28.2 square miles and empties into the Great Miami River at river mile 72.6. Existing project. Project consists of approximately 4,300 feet of channel widening (80 foot bottom width) with associated bank protection. The existing box culvert type Conrail bridge will be replaced with a 70 foot clear span structure. Project will provide protection to 428 structures in West Carrollton and Moraine. Estimated total cost of new work is $5,420,000 Federal and $2,042,000 non-Federal. Location eooperation. The non-Federal cost sharing partner is the Miami Conservancy District (MCD). MCD formed the Holes Creek/Owl Creek Conservancy Subdistrict to act as formal sponsor for this project. The Conservancy Court of Montgomery County approved the Subdistrict in December, 1994. An official plan and an appraisal record prepared by the Subdistrict were approved in November, 1995, enabling the Subdistrict to enter into the Project Cooperation Agreement with the Government in September 1996. Funds will be provided to the Subdistrict by Montgomery County, the City of West Carrollton, the City of Moriane, and Miami Township. Operations during fiscal year. Work this fiscal year includes completion of the Phase I construction contract, completion of the Phase II plans and specifications and completion of real estate acquisition. Conditions at end offiscal year. Project is about 25 percent complete overall. Design is complete. 11. MILL CREEK, OH Location. Project is located along the 18-mile length of Mill Creek and three-fourths mile length of East Forke. Existing project. Eighteen miles of channel improvement, 2 miles of levees, two pumping plants, modification of 29 bridges, and the addition of two pumping units at the present Mill Creek Barrier Dam, located near the Ohio River, are included in the project. Acquisition and development with appropriate landscaping of 620 acres along the creek will be provided for highdensity urban oriented recreational use. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 as amended, applies. In addition, local interests must provide without cost to the United States all modifications and relocations ofbuildings, utilities, street and foot bridges, sewers, and related and special facilities as necessary for construction of project; prevent encroachment on improved channels and on ponding areas which would impair capacities; at least annually inform interests affected as to degree of protection afforded by project, and provide guidance and leadership in preventing unwise and uneconomical development of flood plain areas by encouraging prudent use of floodproofing, land regulation planning, or other flood plain management techniques to reduce flood losses. Further, with respect to the recreational aspects of the project, local interests are required to furnish assurances that they will, if necessary, pay or contribute in kind, a portion of the cost of recreational facilities which, when added to the cost of recreation land, would amount to at least 50 percent of the total first cost of the recreation land and recreational facilities, and assure access to the recreation facilities to all on equal terms. An assurance agreement covering local cooperation requirements for the project consistent with Section 221 of the 1970 Flood Control Act and the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 was executed by the Millcreek Valley Conservancy District February 6, 1975, and for the Secretary of the Army March 28, 1975. A recreation cost sharing contract was executed by the Conservancy District February 25, 1975, and approved by the Secretary of the Army May 28, 1975. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has initiated a Geneeral Reevaluation Report that will provide a new course of action for completing the project. In addition, an agreement was executed wherein the Corps can complete repairs to previously constructed sections of the project and turn them over to the local sponsor for assumption of full maintenance on those portions of the total project. All further design and construction activities are unprogrammed. Maintenance: During the 1998 flood season estimated damages of $400,000 were prevented. Condition at end of fiscal year. DM #1, Hydrology & Hydraulics; DM #2, Phase 1, Plan Formulation; DM #3, Phase II, General Project; DM #4, Construction Materials; DM #5, Railroad Relocations, and DM #6, Barrier Dam Pumps are complete. DM#7, Public Use was completed in FY 1992. Construction channel and levee-Sections 2,3,4A, and 7A, Phase 1, are complete. Project is about 52 percent complete overall. 12. OHIO RIVER FLOOD PROTECTION (INDIANA SHORELINE), IN Location. The six existing local flood protection projects are located along the Indiana shore from Ohio 24-4 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT River mile 492 in Lawenceburg downstream to mile 792 in Evansville. They are in the communities of Evansville, Tell City, Cannelton, New Albany, Jeffersonville- Clarksville, and Lawrenceburg. Existing project. Each of the six local flood projects were constructed by the Corps and have been locally operated and maintained. All six projects were constructed to protect against the 1937 flood plus three feet of freeboard. Rehabilitation measures are necessary at each of the six sites in order to maintain their integrity and to insure that they continue to provide the benefits for which they were designed. Rehabilitation would consist of sliplining (or where necessary replacement) of all pipes and culverts which are part of the flood protection facilities, replacing aging pump station equipment, restoring expansion joints and closures, and repairing, as needed, floodwalls and other structures. Estimated cost of new work 1998 is $4,175,000 Federal and $1,391,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Each of the six communities have continued to express their desire to participate in the project during negotiations of the Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) Packages. Operations during the fiscal year. Work this year includes preparation and negotiation of PCA's and initiation of the plans and specification on all communities. Conditions at the end of fiscal year. Project is about 20 percent overall with design approximately 50 percent complete. 13. POND CREEK, LOUISVILLE, KY Location. The project is located in the central and eastern portions of the 126 square mile Pond Creek watershed in southern Jefferson County, Kentucky. Existing project. The project consists of constructing a 1500 acre-feet detention basin storage facility along Northern Ditch. An existing abandoned rock quarry adjacent to Fishpool Creek will be converted to a detention basin. Approximately 2.4 miles of the Pond Creek channel will be enlarged as well as 1.5 miles of Northern Ditch. A multi-purpose maintenance road/ recreation trail will be constructed along the length of the Pond Creek channel improvement. In addition, three inactive settling basins owned by the local sponsor will be converted into an environmental restoration site. Estimated cost of new work (1998) is $17,325.000 of which $12,083,000 is Federal and $5,242,000 is non- Federal. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. Local cooperation. The non-Federal cost sharing partner is the Louisville and Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer District (MSD). MSD has included all funds necessary for their cost share of the project in their capital budget plan. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed in March 1998. Operations during fiscal year. Work this year includes finalizing the plans and specifications for three construction contracts and awarding the quarry detention basin contract. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The project is about 25 percent complete. Design is 80 percent complete . The first phase of the construction project has been initiated. 14. SALYERSVILLE, KY Location. Project is located along the banks of the Licking River from approximately mile 266 and 271 in Magoffin County, Kentucky along the Mountain Parkway about 75 miles southeast of Lexington, Kentucky. Existing project. The most cost-effective and feasible plan to provide the authorized level of protection (1978 flood protection) is called the "Cut-Thru Plan" and includes two channel cut-thrus, a barrier dam at the upstream cut-thru, and an 0.8 mile reach of channel improvement connecting the two cut-thrus. Estimated total cost of new work is $8,541,000 of which $7,730,000 is Federal and $811,000 is non-Federal. Local cooperation. The local sponsor qualifies for an "ability to pay" reduction pursuant to Section 103(m) of the 1986 Water Resource Development Act. Based on current costs and economics, the local sponsor share would be 9.5 percent of the total project cost. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed in August 1995. The construction contract was awarded in September 1996 and completed in July 1998. Operations during the fiscal year. Construction was completed. Conditions at the end of fiscal year. Project is complete. 15. SOUTHWESTERN JEFFERSON COUNTY, KY Location. In Jefferson County, KY, on left bank of Ohio River from mile 616 to 628.6. Existing project. Construction of 68,500 feet of levee, 1,550 feet of concrete wall, four pumping plants, and other necessary appurtenances. Project provides protection for 24,100 acres against Ohio River floods equal to 1937 flood of record with 3-foot freeboard. Cost of new work is $70,049,083, of which $60,207,030 is Federal, and $9,842,053 is non-Federal. Project was authorized under Flood Control Act of August 1968. Recreation as a project purpose has been deferred. Local cooperation. Section 3 Flood Control Act of 1936 as amended applies. In addition, local interests agree to administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and to pay, contribute in kind or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost of the project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of lands and facilities for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. Jefferson County Fiscal Court expressed intent to fulfill requirements by resolution dated April 4, 1967. Formal assurances of local cooperation for the flood protection portion of the project was executed by resolution of Jefferson County Fiscal Court, adopted September 17, 1971, and assurances for the recreation portion of the project were 24-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 executed by similar resolution, adopted September 14, 1971. Authorization-of-entry for levee and floodwall sections 1,2,3,4,4A,5 and Pond Creek Pump Plant have been furnished. Project was transferred to local interest on September 8, 1989. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Expenses to collect a judgement from a contractor who installed pumps and motors at the Pond Creek Pumping Station continued. Project is 100 percent complete except for the collection of the judgement from the pump contractor. During the 1998 flood season, no benefits were realized. 16. SOUTHERN AND EASTERN KENTUCKY Location: The project location comprises a 27 county region in southern eastern Kentucky, which includes portions of the Louisville, Huntington, and Nashville Districts. The program is for the design and construction assistance of environmental infrastructure projects in that region. Existing Project. This is a new program and no facilities have been constructed. Three (3) potential projects are under consideration in the Louisville District: a sewer line extension in Menifee County, near the community of Means; a sewer line and wetland treatment system along Caney Creek in Breathitt County; and a water line extension along Bill Hall Branch in Floyd County. Work is authorized under Section 531 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (P.L. 104-303). Local Cooperation. The non-Federal cost sharing partners are Menifee County, Breathitt County, and the Beaver Elkhorn Water District respectively. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) has been negotiated with Menifee County, and is scheduled to be executed in March 1999. PCA negotiations ons are under way with Breathitt County and Beaver Elkhorn Water district. Operations during fiscal year. work this year includes award and construction of the Menifee County project, preparation of plans & specifications for the Breathitt County project, and award of the Beaver Elkhorn Water district construction contract. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the Menifee County project will be essentially complete. Construction of the Beaver Elkhorn Water District Project will be under way. Design of the Breathitt County project will be complete. 17. WABASH RIVER, NEW HARMONY, IN Location. The project is located in Posey County in Southwestern Indiana along the left bankof the Wabash River. The town is about 120 miles southwest of Louisville, Kentucky, and seven miles south of 1-64. Existing Project. The project consists of providing erosion control along the left bank of the Wabash River at New Harmony, Indiana. This will be accomplished by placing stone beginning at a point 950 meters (3117 feet) upstream of the State Highway 66 bridge and continuing upstream for a distance of 1470 meters (4823). To comply with environmental commitments, wildlife supporting hardwood seedlings will be planted along the project right -of-way. Estimated cost of the new work is $2,828,000 of which $2,121,000 is Federal and $707,000 is non-Federal. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. Local Cooperation. The non-Federal cost sharing partners are the Town of New Harmony, Indiana and the Department of Natural Resources (IDNR). Both cost sharing partners have included all funding necessary for their cost share of the project in their FY 99 budgets. The cost sharing partners are working on an agreement describing contributions to the project by the Town of New Harmony and IDNR. A Project Cooperative Agreement (PCA) package has been prepared and will be forwarded to ASA (CW) for review and approval once the agreement between the Town of New Hamony and INDR is received. Operations during the fiscal year. Work this year includes completion and execution of the PCA, acquisition of required real estate by the local sponsors and possible award of the construction project. Conditions at the end of fiscal year. The project is about 25 percent complete. Design of the project is complete and construction has been authorized and funding provided. 18. WHITE RIVER, INDIANAPOLIS CENTRAL WATERFRONT, IN Location. Project is located along the White River in the City of Indianapolis, IN. Existing project. Project consists of infrastructure improvements such as public access parking, walkways, pedestrian bridges, landscaping, lighting, and water features. The project also includes continuous public access along both sides of the White River waterfront through the construction of walkways, bike paths, landscaped promenades, and the rebuilding and reconfiguring of the existing concrete slopewalls. Estimated cost of new work is $39,975,000 Federal and $47,838,000 non- Federal. Local cooperation. The non-Federal sponsors are the White River State Park (State of Indiana) and the City of Indianapolis. All lands for the project have been acquired by the sponsors. By the end of 1998 approximately $31,000,000 of construction funded by the sponsors will have been completed. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed in December 1997. Operation during fiscal year. Work this year includes award of two construction contracts and continuation of the remainder of plans and specifications. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is about 55 percent complete overall with design approximately 80 percent complete and construction about 50 percent complete. 24-6 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT Flood Control - Reservoirs 19. BARREN RIVER LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Barren River, 79.5 miles above its confluence with Green River and 10 miles northeast ofScottsville, KY. At flood control pool reservoir extends upstream about 40 miles in Barren and Allen Counties, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Lucas, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earth and rockfill, 146 feet high and 3,970 feet long, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open-cut spillway. Total storage capacity is 815,200 acre-feet (768,000 for flood control and 46,600 for water supply storage). For further details, see page 1125 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of the completed project is $27,479,717 including $2,335,055 Federal funds and $108,418 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Under provision of Water Supply Act of 1958, contract with City of Glasgow for water supply storage was approved by Secretary of Army on October 4, 1965. Terms require City to pay $23,433, which is project cost allocated to water storage plus capitalized prepayment of proportionate share of operation, maintenance, and major replacement costs. A contract, with the Common wealth of Kentucky for development of additional campsites, shoreline protection and breakwater extension at Barren River Lake State Park under the cost-sharing category of the completed projects program was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 4, 1977. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. During the 1998 flood season estimated damages of $14,491,000 were prevented. Recreational benefits were $47,431,327. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in March 1960 and all major construction and relocation items were completed in October 1964. Project was placed in operation in March 1964. Land acquisition is complete. 20. BROOKVILLE LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is on East Fork of Whitewater River, 2.4 miles above confluence with West Fork, and about 1-1/2 miles north of Brookville, Indiana. The reservoir lies in Franklin and Union Counties, Indiana. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Brookville, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earthfill, 182 feet high and 3,004 feet long, with gate-controlled outlet works, and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 359,600 acre-feet (214,700 for flood control, 89,300 for water supply, and 35,500 for conservation). Aminimum pool of 20,100 acre-feet is maintained. Cost of completed new work is $45,402,565 of which $37,905,073 is Federal cost and $7,497,492 is non-Federal contribution for water supply storage. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Contract with State of Indiana for water supply storage under provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958 was approved by Secretary of Army, August 5, 1965. Under terms of contract, State paid initial costs allocated to water supply feature of project plus capitalized prepayment of proportionate share of operation and maintenance costs. Operation during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: During 1998 flood season estimated damages of $936,000 were prevented. Routine maintenance was performed. Recreational benefits were $28,598,155. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in November 1965 and project was placed in operation January 1974. Construction and land acquisition are complete. 21. BUCKHORN LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Middle Fork of Kentucky River, 43.4 miles above mouth, and 0.5 mile upstream from Buckhorn, Perry County, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 34 miles and lies in Leslie and Perry Counties, Kentucky. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Buckhorn, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam is earth and rockfill type, with gate controlled outlet works. Total storage capacity is 168,000 acre-feet, of which 157,600 is for flood control. For further details, see page 1120 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of completed new work is $11,766,206 including $386,707 for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Department of Parks of the Commonwealth of Kentucky has undertaken management of lands and recreational facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on June 29, 1962. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during 1998 flood season prevented damages of $2,264,000. Recreational benefits were $7,938,964. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in September 1956 and project was placed in operation in August 1960. All construction and land acquisition is complete. 22. CAESAR CREEK LAKE, OH Location. Damsite is on Caesar Creek, about 3.0 miles above its confluence with Little Miami River, in Warren County, OH, about 3.5 miles southeast of Waynesville, OH, and 10.5 miles northeast of Lebanon, OH. Reservoir lies in Warren, Clinton, and Green Counties, OH. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Oregonia, OH.) 24-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earth and rockfill dam, four saddle dams, outlet works and an uncontrolled saddle spillway. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 242,200 acre-feet, of which 148,500 acre-feet is reserved for flood control storage. Cost of new work is $62,881,010 and Federal $5,037,000 non-Federal reimbursement for water supply storage. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1983 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. However, the State of Ohio requested inclusion in the project of storage for future municipal and industrial water supply uses. Contract with State of Ohio for water supply storage under provisions ofWater Supply Act of 1958, as amended, was approved by Secretary of the Army, May 20, 1970. Under terms of contract, State will reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of this storage is initiated plus estimated annual amount for cost of operation, maintenance and major capital replacements required for the water supply facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Flood damages estimated at $17,241,000 were prevented during the 1998 flood season. Recreational benefits were $36,217,418. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in January 1968 and the project was placed in operation January 1978. Land acquisition is complete. All relocation and construction features are complete. 23. CAGLES MILL LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Mill Creek, 2.8 miles above its confluence with Eel River, in Putnam County, IN, and about 25 miles east of Terre Haute, IN. Reservoir extends upstream about 11 miles and is in Putnam and Owen Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Poland, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam is earth and rockfill embankment. Total storage capacity is 228,100 acre-feet, of which 201,000 acre-feet are for flood control. For details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1136. Cost of new work is $4,369,997, which includes $4,256,903 Federal funds, and $113,094 contributed funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. State of Indiana has undertaken development and management ofrecreation facilities for use of the public in reservoir area in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on January 17, 1952. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources for expanding the boat ramp and parking area at Site 3, Lieber State Park, under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program was signed by the State of Indiana on August 26, 1981 and approved by the Deputy Chief of Engineers on March 26, 1982. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1998 flood season prevented damages of $8,518,000. Recreational benefits were $10,765,879. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in July 1948 and completed in June 1953. Recreation facilities constructed under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program are complete. 24. CARR CREEK LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is 8.8 miles above mouth of Carr Fork, a tributary of North Fork of Kentucky River, 16 miles upstream from Hazard, KY. The reservoir lies entirely within Knott County. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Carrie and Vicco, KY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rock and earth fill with impervious core, 720 feet long and 130 feet high, with uncontrolled open cut spillway through left abutment. Outlet works has two control gates and 8- foot diameter conduit to stilling basin. Total storage capacity is 47,700 acre-feet (31,600 for flood control and 4,300 for water quality control). A higher level seasonal pool for recreation is provided. Cost of completed work is $50,854,826 including $76,724 for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for reservoir project. Division of Flood Control and Water Usage of Commonwealth of Kentucky gave assurance that encroachments on downstream channel capacity will be prevented. Under the terms of a new lease, the State of Kentucky will assume operation of the Irishman Creek Beach and Campground in 1996. This establishes a State Park at this lake also providing the impetus for additional resort development. The Kentucky Department of Parks completed the first year of operation of the campground and beach area. The transition to a state park was successful. Project name was changed from Carr Fork Lake, KY to Carr Creek Lake, KY effective 16 February 1997 by Public law 104-303, 12 October 1996. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1998 flood season prevented damages of $6,969,000. Recreational benefits were $10,765,700. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was placed in operation January 1976. Construction started in January 1966 is complete. 25. CAVE RUN LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is on Licking River, about 4 miles upstream from U.S. Highway 60 near Farmers, KY, and 7 miles southwest ofMorehead, KY. Reservoir will be in Rowan, Bath, Morgan, and Menifee Counties, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Salt Lick and Morehead, KY.) 24-8 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT Existing project. Plan provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earthfill, with gate controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 614,700 acre-feet (438,500 for flood control and 28,300 for water quality control). Cost of new work is $81,159,541 of which $6,900,000 is U.S. Forest Service cost. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of June 22, 1936 and June 28, 1938. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1998 flood season prevented damages of $3,904,000. Recreation benefits were $12,242,100. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project has been in operation since February 1974. Construction was started in June 1965 and is complete. Land acquisition is complete. All relocation and construction features are complete. 26. CECIL M. HARDEN LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Raccoon Creek, 32.4 miles above its confluence with Wabash River, and 25 miles northeast of Terre Haute, IN. At flood control pool, reservoir extends upstream about 15 miles in Parke and Putnam Counties, Indiana. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map of Mansfield, IN.) Existing project. A rolled earth dam and reservoir, for flood control and allied purposes. Total storage capacity is 132,800 acre-feet of which 116,600 acre-feet area for flood control. For details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1132. Cost of completed new work is $6,987,807 made up of $6,260,134 for the initial project and $373,678 Federal cost and $353,995 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Project name was changed from Mansfield Lake to Cecil M. Harden Lake by Public Law 93-521, December 14, 1974. Local cooperation. State of Indiana has undertaken management of lands and recreational facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on April 19, 1961. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operation during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Flood damages of $8,356,000 were prevented during the 1998 flood season. Recreational benefits were $36,935,432. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in October 1956 and all major items of work were completed December 1961. Land acquisition is complete. Project has been in operation since August 1960. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are completed. 27. CLARENCE J. BROWN DAM & RESERVOIR, OH Location. Damsite is just east of Springfield, Clark County, OH, at mile 7.3 of Buck Creek, a tributary of Mad River. (See U. S. Geological Survey maps of New Moorefield and Springfield, OH.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam, 6,620 feet long and 72 feet high, with gated outlet works and open cut spillway with concrete chute through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 63,700 acrefeet (32,900 for flood control and 20,800 for water quality control). Federal cost of completed project is $22,083,660. Project was authorized by 1962 Flood ControlAct. Project name was changed from Buck Creek Dam and Reservoir to Clarence J. Brown Dam and Reservoir by Public Law 90-46, July 4, 1967. Local cooperation. Assurances from City of Springfield, Springfield Conservancy District, and Clark County, Ohio, covering protection against detrimental channel encroachment below dam to mouth of Buck Creek, were accepted March 5, 1964. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Flood damages of $160,000 were prevented during the 1998 flood season. Recreation benefits were $28,157,976. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in September 1966. Land acquisition and all major project features were completed in November 1973. The project was placed in operation in January 1974. 28. GREEN RIVER LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is 305.7 miles above mouth of Green River in Taylor County, KY, about 8 miles south of Campbellsville. Reservoir lies in Taylor and Adair Counties. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Cane Valley, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth and rockfill, 141 feet high and 2,350 feet long. Outlet works is slide gate-controlled and spillway open and uncontrolled. Total storage capacity is 723,200 acre-feet (560,600 for flood control and 64,500 for low-flow augmentation). Cost of completed new work is $33,462,330, consisting of $33,105,184 initial project funds, $40,001 for water supply, and $317,145 Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was authorized under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Taylor County, by lease approved by Secretary of Army February 15, 1968, undertook operation and maintenance of Smith Ridge public access area. In May 1980, the lease was amended to turn back responsibility for maintenance and operation of 99 percent of the site to the 24-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Corps, with the County retaining responsibility for the marina area. Under provision of Water Supply Act of 1958, contract with City of Campbellsville for water supply storage was approved by Secretary of Army April 23, 1969. Terms require city to repay, with interest and annual charges for operation, maintenance and major replacement, the investment cost of $85,765 allocated to its water supply storage space. Total payments received through fiscal year 1984 was $21,504. The Department of Parks of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, by lease approved by Secretary of Army, October 4, 1971, has undertaken the management of the Lone Valley public access area. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages estimated at $6,326,000 during 1998 flood season. Recreational benefits were $28,338,078. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in August 1965 and all major construction and relocation items were completed in 1972. Project has been in operation since February 1969. Project including all land acquisition complete in 1973. Construction of sanitary dump station for boats at Dam Site in conformance with EPA and State standards and rehabilitation of sewage treatment facilities, washhouses and restrooms at Smith Ridge site is complete. 29. J. EDWARD ROUSH LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is on Wabash River, about 2 miles from Huntington, IN, and 411.4 miles above mouth. Reservoir is in Huntington and Wells Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Majenica and Mt. Etna, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam consists of a rolled earth embankment 4,700 feet long and 89 feet high, a concrete spillway and outlet section 155 feet long, and a concrete gravity section 310 feet long. Spillway is controlled by three gates, and outlet works by six sluices. Project also provides local flood protection for Markle, IN. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 153,100 acre-feet, of which 149,000 acre-feet is reserved for flood control storage. Cost for new work is $19,621,777 made up of $19,428,355 Federal cost for the initial project and $193,422 non-Federal contributed funds for low flow augmentation storage, and $155,354 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. Project name was changed from Huntington Lake, IN to J. Edward Roush Lake, IN effective 16 February 1997 by Public law 104-303, 12 October 1996. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to one percent of project first cost. State of Indiana has met this obligation. Contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army May 17, 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreational facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost shared category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages estimated at $13,196,000 during 1998 flood control season. Recreation benefits were$9,779,291. Condition at end of fiscal year. Land acquisition and all major construction complete. Project was placed in operation January 9, 1969. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 30. MISSISSINEWA LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is 7.1 miles above mouth of Mississinewa River, which flows into Wabash River about 2 miles upstream from Peru, IN. At flood control pool level, reservoir extends upstream about 28 miles, in Wabash, Grant, and Miami Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Peoria, IN.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam 137 feet high and 8,100 feet long, gate-controlled outlet works, and an uncontrolled open spillway through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 368,400 acre-feet, of which 345,100 acre-feet are reserved for flood control storage. Cost for completed new work is $24,379,800 made up of $23,791,816 Federal cost for the initial project, $239,200 non-Federal contributed funds for low flow augmentation storage. $174,392 Federal cost and $174,392 non- Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to 1 percent of project first cost. State of Indiana assumed this obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages of $26,840,000 during 1998 flood season. Recreation benefits were $21,647,246. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction and land acquisition is complete. Project was placed in operation in May 1968. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 31. MONROE LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Salt Creek, a tributary of White River, 25.9 miles above mouth, and 2 miles each of Harrodsburg, Monroe County, IN. At flood control pool level, reservoir will extend upstream 44 miles in Mon- 24-10 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT roe, Brown, and Jackson Counties. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Clear Creek, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth core and rock shell, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 441,000 acre-feet (258,800 for flood control and 159,900 for low flow augmentation.) Cost of completed new work is $16,570,774 consisting of $7,032,484 Federal funds, $7,797,604 non-Federal contributed funds for low-flow regulation storage and $870,343 Federal cost and $870,343 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act, modifying comprehensive plait for Ohio River Basin. Local cooperation. Section 3, 1944 Flood Control Act applies. Local interests must contribute 54.1 percent of project cost, this being the proportion allocated to low-flow regulation feature, plus a capitalized amount representing that part of average annual maintenance and operation cost allocated to low-flow regulation. State of Indiana assumed this cost sharing obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work. None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages of $7,247,000 during 1998 flood season. Recreation benefits were $37,158,459. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete and was placed in operation in February 1965. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 32. NOLIN LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Nolin River 7.8 miles above its confluence with Green River, about 70 air miles southwest of Louisville, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 57 miles and is in Edmonson, Grayson, Hart, and Hardin Counties, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Nolin Reservoir and Dickeys Mill, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rockfill-earth core type with gate-controlled outlet works, and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 609,400 acre-feet, of which 545,600 acre-feet is for flood control. For further details of project, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1124. Cost of new work is $17,193,278 including $2,594,274 for construction of recreation facilities. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for authorized project. State of Kentucky contributed $18,195 for increased width of dam for public road. Kentucky has assumed responsibility of the Brier Creek site to establish a State Park in 1996. The Brier Creek campground was successfully operated by Kentucky for the first year as state park. Improvements are planned by Kentucky. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. During the 1998 flood season estimated damages of $1,635,000 were prevented. Recreation benefits were $48,282,975. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in January 1959. Project was completed and placed in operation in March 1963. 33. OHIO RIVER BASIN (Louisville District) Location. Works covered by this project are a series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs in Ohio River Basin within Louisville District. Existing project. Individual projects considered in comprehensive plan within the Louisville District. (See Table 24-B for authorizing legislation and Table 24-I for cost and listing of projects in the basin plan.) Operations during fiscal year. No costs were incurred except for these projects for which individual reports are given. 34. PATOKA LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is in Dubois County, IN, 118.3 miles above mouth of Patoka River, and 50 miles westnorthwest of New Albany, IN. Reservoir extends into Dubois, Orange, and Crawford Counties. (See Geological Survey map of Cuzco, IN.) Existing project. Reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth and rock fill, 1,550 feet long and 85 feet high, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 301,600 acre-feet(121,000 for flood control and 167,500 for water supply and water quality control). Cost of new work is $73,316,892 of which $53,050,294 is Federal cost for other construction, and $20,266,598 is non-Federal contribution for water supply storage and recreation facilities. Project was authorized by 1965 Flood Control Act, and emergency measures and snagging and clearing the Patoka River downstream of Patoka Lake to ensure effective operation of the project for flood control was directed by 1981 Appropriation Act for Energy and Water Development. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage is initiated, presently estimated at 29.316 percent of thejoint-use facilities cost, exclusive of interests, plus $287,000 for the cost of operating and maintaining water supply storage for a period of 50 years, plus $42,000 for the cost of major capital replacements required for water supply storage space for a period of 50 years. Local interests are also required to pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost of the project allocated to recreation. Present laws of the State of Indiana require that agency to make cash contributions during construction of the project. Local 24-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 interests must also agree to prevent encroachments on channel of Patoka River from dam to mouth, and to pay allocated initial and annual maintenance and operation costs for water supply storage. Formal assurances of local cooperation, executed by the Indiana Natural Resources Commission, were accepted August 27,1970. Contracts with State of Indiana for water supply and recreation were approved by the Secretary of the Army November 2, 1970. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Sinkholes in the spillway area that are connected to porous limestone layers continue to be an operational concern. A study was completed and recommended as $7.2 million major rehabilitation of the dam. Operation for flood control during the 1998 flood season prevented damage estimated at $6,580,000. Recreational benefits were $32,833,005. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in July 1972. Engineering studies are complete. Real Estate relocation work is complete. All major features are complete. Permanent impoundment was started in February 1978 and the project was placed in operation about August 1980. 35. ROUGH RIVER LAKE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, KY Location. Dam is on Rough River, 89.3 miles above its confluence with Green River, 160.3 miles above Ohio River, and about 60 miles southwest of Louisville, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 30 miles and is in Breckinridge, Hardin, and Grayson Counties, KY. Channel improvement work is on Rough River, Barnett Creek, and West Fork of Barnett Creek. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of McDaniels and Falls of Rough, KY.) Existing project. Reservoir is for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earthfill type, with gatecontrolled outlet works. Storage capacity is 334,380 acre-feet, of which 314,210 acre-feet is for flood control. Project also includes channel clearing of lower Rough River, and channel improvement on Barnett Creek, a tributary of Rough River. For further details, see page 1126 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of completed new work is $10,643,001 including $890,008 Federal funds and $22,612 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Modification of previously approved plan to include channel improvement items was authorized by the 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for construction of reservoir unit. Provisions of Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936, are applicable to channel improvements. Assurances were obtained from Ohio County for channel improvement. Department of Parks, Commonwealth of Kentucky, has undertaken management of certain lands and recreation facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on August 18, 1961. A contract with the Commonwealth of Kentucky to improve and pave road at the Below Dam Area - State Park under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 4, 1977. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1998 flood season prevented damages estimated at $2,491,000. Recreational benefits were $49,069,413. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in November 1955 and reservoir was placed in operation in June 1959. Land acquisition and all major items of construction and relocation are complete. 36. SALAMONIE LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is 3.1 miles above mouth of Salamonie River which enters Wabash River about 6 miles upstream from Wabash, IN. Reservoir extends upstream about 27 miles at flood control pool and lies in Wabash and Huntington Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Lagro and Majenica, IN.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 133 feet and length of 6,100 feet, gate-controlled outlet works with a 16-foot-diameter conduit and an uncontrolled open spillway through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 263,600 acre-feet, of which 250,500 acre-feet is for flood control storage. Costfornewworkis $17,039,321 made up of$16,244,356 Federal cost for the initial project and $163,867 non- Federal contributed funds for low-flow augmentation storage and $315,549 Federal cost and $315,549 non- Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to one percent of project first cost. State of Indiana assumed this obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe, and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. During the 1998 flood season, operation for flood control prevented damages of $20,074,000. Recreation benefits were $17,504,079. Condition at end of fiscal year. Land acquisition and all major construction and relocation contracts are complete. Reservoir was placed in operation in spring 1967. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 37. TAYLORSVILLE LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is in Spencer County, KY, 60.0 miles above the confluence of Salt River and Ohio 24-12 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT River, 4 river miles above Taylorsville and 36.9 river miles above Shepherdsville, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Taylorsville, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is an earth and rock fill structure, 164 feet high and 1,280 feet long. Outlet works are slide gate controlled and spillway is uncontrolled open cut. Total storage capacity will be 291,670 acre-feet (211,230 for flood control, winter months), and 52,245 for water quality and fish and wildlife. Estimated cost of new work (1998) is $122,090,000 made up of $92,980,000 Federal cost for the initial project and $17,020,000 non-Federal contributed funds for initial recreation facilities and $6,045,000 Federal cost and $6,045,000 non-Federal contributed funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to administer project land and water areas for recreation; pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest one-half of the separable first costs of the project allocated to recreation; bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation lands and facilities. Local interests must also agree to prevent encroachments on flow-carrying capacities of stream channels below the reservoir to the extent needed to provide reasonably effective reservoir operation. Commonwealth of Kentucky has indicated intent to fulfill requirements for recreation cost sharing and has assumed responsibility for channel encroachments and pollution control. The Commonwealth furnished assurance agreements covering prevention of encroachment on capacity of stream channels in April and May 1973 and executed the recreation cost sharing contract in April 1973. On April 2, 1980, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky ruled that the 1973 recreation cost sharing contract between the Commonwealth and the United States that provided for repayment after completion was invalid under the Kentucky Constitution which prohibits one General Assembly from obligating future appropriations that would be binding on a subsequent legislature. In response to the Court's ruling, the Commonwealth and the United States entered into a new contract providing for cash contributions. Contract was approved by the Secretary of the Army June 11, 1980. The contract was found to be valid and enforceable by the Court July 14, 1980. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract to remove debris from Taylorsville Lake was completed. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. During the 1998 flood season operation for flood control prevented damages of $854,000. Recreation benefits were $20,831,350. Condition at end of fiscal year. Engineering and design studies are complete except for design of a comfort station. Land acquisition is 100 percent complete. Construction was started in June 1974. All major construction items are complete except recreation facilities. The dam gates were closed in January 1983 for permanent impoundment. Dedication ceremony was May 28, 1983. Two sections of county road were washed out by heavy rainfall. Both sections were originally upgraded for project operation prior to washout. The repairs were completed by the Corps in 1996-97 at a cost of $700,000. 38. WABASH RIVER BASIN Location. Works covered by this project are located in the Wabash River Basin, a drainage area of 33,100 square miles, covering parts of Indiana, Illinois, and Ohio. Existing project. One local protection project and five reservoir projects were authorized for this basin plan. (See Table 24-B for authorizing legislation and Table 24-J for project list and total cost of basin plan.) 39. WEST FORK OF MILL CREEK LAKE, OH Location. Dam is on West Fork of Mill Creek 6.5 miles above its junction with Mill Creek and 2 miles northeast of Mount Health, OH, and 10 miles north of downtown Cincinnati. Reservoir extends upstream about 3 miles and is in Hamilton County, OH. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Glendale, OH.) Existing project. An earth embankment dam and a reservoir for flood control, recreation, and reduction of pumping requirements at Mill Creek barrier dam in Cincinnati. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 11,300 acre-feet, of which 9,850 acre-feet is for flood control. For further details, see page 1119 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of completed new work is $4,722,463 made up of $3,092,941 Federal cost for the initial project, $520,800 non-Federal cost for sewer relocation and dam, $50,000 non-Federal contributed funds in fulfillment of project authorization and $529,361 Federal cost and $529,361 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project selected for construction under additional authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1946 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests were to release necessary land under their control and give assurance that future channel encroachment below damsite would be prevented. For enlargement of reservoir to include a conservation pool, local interests would contribute onehalf additional cost of such pool, including one-half cost of relocation of sanitary sewer, and agree to hold the United States free from damages resulting from its provision. Board of County Commissioners of Hamilton County, Ohio, adopted a resolution October 8, 1947, signifying willingness to fulfill requirements including provision of conservation pool. Assurances were executed on same date. A contract with the United States for relocation of sanitary sewer outside reservoir area in order to include conservation pool in project was accepted by Hamilton County, in which the United States paid one-half cost of such relocation work. Hamilton County Commissioners furnished $50,000, required as a local contribution toward additional cost of providing conservation pool. Hamilton County Park District has undertaken development and management of recreation facilities in reservoir area for use of the public in accordance with the license granted by Secretary of the 24-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Army on October 31, 1951. Contract for cost shared recreation development under the completed works program was executed by the Board of Park Commissioners, Hamilton County Park District, Ohio, in September 1975 and approved by the Chief of Engineers in December 1975. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Operation for flood control during 1998 flood season prevented damages estimated at $14,505,000. Recreation benefits were $34,167,420. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in March 1949 and reservoir was placed in operation in December 1952. Project is complete. Cost shared recreation development under the completed projects program is complete. 40. WILLIAM H. HARSHA LAKE, OH Location. Damsite is on East Fork of Little Miami River between Batavia and Williamsburg, OH, about 6.0 miles above Batavia and 32.6 miles above mouth of the Little Miami River. Entire project lies in Clermont County, OH. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Batavia,OH.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam, outlet works, an uncontrolled saddle spillway, and a dike to close a saddle north of spillway. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 294,800 acre-feet, of which 210,600 acrefeet is reserved for flood control storage. Cost of complete new work is $52,023,157 and a estimated $3,485,840 non-Federal reimbursement for water supply storage. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Project name was changed from East Fork Lake to William H. Harsha Lake effective January 4, 1981, by Public Law 96-383, October 6, 1980. Local cooperation. None required. However, the State of Ohio requested inclusion in the project of storage for future municipal and industrial water supply uses. Contract with State of Ohio for water supply storage under provisions ofWater Supply Act of 1958, as amended, was approved by Secretary of the Army, May 20, 1970. Under terms of contract, State will reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of this storage is initiated plus estimated annual amount for cost of operation, maintenance, and major capital replacements required for the water supply facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: A new water intake structure was completed in 1995 to support a regional public water supply system. Operation for flood control during 1998 flood season prevented damages estimated at $12,854,000. Recreation benefits were $28,667,796. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in May 1970. Project is complete and reservoir was placed in operation in February' 1978. 41. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to maintain and operate local protection projects in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. Inspections were made to determine extent of compliance and to advise interests as necessary to measures required to correct deficiencies. (See Table 24-K for the latest dates of inspection performed on the local protection projects, channel improvements, and bank revetments). Fiscal year costs were $262,425. Total costs to September 30, 1998, were $4,943,908. 42. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 24-E. 43. FLOOD CONTROL WORKS UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities pursuant to Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation. Costs for fiscal year were $619,590 for disaster preparedness, $45,124 for emergency operations, and $41 for field investigations. Environmental restoration activities pursuant to Section 1135, 1986 water Resources Development Act, as amended. Costs for fiscal year were $4,856 for one feasibility report: $80,498 for plans & specifications on three projects; $2,328 for one project completing construction; $6,655 for preliminary restoration plan on one project; and $3,168 for coordination activities. See table 24-L. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, Public law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. Costs for fiscal year were $201,203 for eleven feasibility reports; $127,600 for plans and specifications on two projects; $1,235,155 for five projects under construction; $5,737 for two projects completing construction; $63,467 for ix studies that were terminated; and $14,721 for coordination activities. Reflects Federal cost only, for full costs see Table 24- L. Emergency bank protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Costs for fiscal year were $162,020 for planning and design analysis on seven projects; $46,265 for three projects completing construction; and $9,946 for coordination activities. Reflects Federal cost only, for full costs see Table 24- L. Aquatic Ecosystems Restoration (Section 206). Costs for fiscal year were $12,530 for preliminary restoration plan for one project and $4,041 for coordination activities. See Table 24-L. 24-14 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT General Investigations 44. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs was $2,876,181 for one Navigation Study; $729,263 for fifteen Flood Damage Prevention Studies; $45,917 for two Special Studies; $239,875 for one Review of Authorized Projects; and $76,105 for four Miscellaneous Activities. Reflects Federal cost only, for full cost see Table 24-M. 45. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Fiscal year costs were $52,496 for one Navigation projects; $487,401 for seven Flood Control Projects. Reflects Federal cost only, for full cost see Table 24-M. 46. COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES Fiscal year total cost was $5,553 for Coordination With Other Agencies; and $26,018 for Planning Assistance to States. Reflects Federal cost only, for full cost see Table 24-M. 47. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year total cost was $199,834 for eight Flood Plain Management Services; and $11,167 for Hydologic Studies. Reflects Federal cost only, for full cost see Table 24-M. 24-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 24-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Fundng 1995 1996 1997 1998 Sep 30,1998 Navigation - Channels and Harbors Open Channel Work, New Work Licking River Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Navigation - Locks and Dams 3 Green and Barren New Work Rivers, KY Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost $$ $$ $$ 0* 0* 7,700 10,000 35,974 16,500 189,185 6,991 10,665 36,018 16,423 189,108 13,808,222 1 13,808,222 1 1,957,800 1,302,000 1,737,411 1,922,000 45,400,461 2,3 2,128,204 1,381,129 1,735,685 1,920,778 45,377,026 4 Kentucky River, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. . Cost 00 556,956 556,956 4,188,950 2,769,000 2,612,233 2,452,000 76,574,524 "45 4,307,266 3,148,755 3,230,687 2,451,441 76,502,894 4'5 00 4,176,749 4,176,749 Flood Control, Local Protection 8 Duck Creek New Work Approp. Cost 9 Frankfort, South Frankfort, KY 10 Holes Creek, OH 11 Mill Creek, OH 12 Ohio River Flood Protection (Indiana Shoreline), IN 13 Pond Creek, KY 14 Salyersville, KY New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost 466,000 868,000 1,334,000 259,476 428,979 688,455 3,224,579 998,000 891,000 (217,561) 7,926,018 7 2,419,779 2,265,617 1,302,259 (787) 7,926,018 8 0 0 190,500 179,245 2,396,439 2,766,184 31 125,894 216,331 627,953 970,178 32 (25,000) (320,000) 566,000 1,955,000 99,301,742 382,865 306,379 663,830 604,847 97,898,182 00 00 10,000 1,000,000 1,300,000 2,310,000 10,000 151,651 272,167 433,818 00 1,500,000 189,635 143,000 1,643,000 53 243,753 433,388 54 0 702,519 4,242,000 2,155,500 9,180,019 10 459,544 663,277 4,687,385 1,374,736 8,132,753 11 24-16 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-A CONTINUED COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Fundng 1995 1996 1997 1998 Sep 30,1998 15 Southwestern Jefferson County, KY New Work Approp. Cost 88,900 134,807 0 24,000 8,781 46,468 20,137 60,225,220 7,164 60,207,030 16 Southern & Eastern, KY New Work Approp Cost 17 Wabah River New Work New Harmony, IN Approp Cost 18 White River, Indpls New Work Central Waterfront, IN Approp. Cost Flood Control - Reservoirs 19 Barren River Lake, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 20 Brookville Lake, IN 21 Buckhorn Lake, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 22 Caesar Creek Lake, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 00 00 880,00 92,448 470,000 4,058 880,000 92,448 470,000 4,058 2,000,000 7,000,000 5,000,000 14,000,000 175,318 298,960 4,520,218 4,994,496 00 27,479,717 12 27,479,717 12 1,713,600 1,814,000 1,734,020 1,766,658 30,008,299 1, 14, 15 1,846,773 1,774,385 1,751,562 1,774,487 31,943,587 1.,14i15 00 45,402,565 16 45,402,565 16 641,500 711,000 685,239 782,000 11,133,963 47 669,835 725,573 689,164 788,799 11,128,213 47 00 11,766,206 17 11,766,206 17 1,210,700 1,137,000 1, 072,107 1,211,100 20,214,130 18 1,309,564 1,150,973 1,106,692 1,265,461 20,191,204 18 0 0 62,881,010 62,881,010 101,1,100 1,416,000 1,338,199 1,305,608 15,299,815 a 1,100,820 1,408,709 1,322,433 1,376,329 15,296,792 a 23 Cagles Mill Lake, IN 4,369,997 19 4,369,997 20 568,850 565,000 661,977 717,079 10,970,723 608,793 552,757 670,768 723,230 10,962,712 New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 00 24-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 24-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT CONTINUED See Section Total to in Text Project Fundng 1995 1996 1997 1998 Sep 30,1998 24 Carr Creek Lake, KY New Work Approp. 0 0 0 0 $50,854,826 18 Cost 0 0 0 0 $50,854,826 18 Maint. Approp. 1,228,300 1,493,000 1,316,804 1,400,000 19,537,589 19 Cost 1,251,995 1,523,428 1,308,457 1,417,835 19,519,265 19 25 Cave Run Lake, KY New Work Approp. 0 0 0 0 81,159,541 23 Cost 0 0 0 0 81,159,541 23 Maint. Approp. 793,900 989,000 843,428 760,945 12,409,594 49 Cost 848,873 812,394 1,047,916 772,972 12,407,445 49 26 Cecil M. Hardin Lake, New Work IN Approp. 0 0 0 0 6,987,807 24 Cost 0 0 0 0 6,987,807 24 Maint. Approp. 656,300 763,000 795,221 847,000 13,933,861 Cost 672,147 778,320 765,159 896,053 13,928,677 27 Clarence J. Brown New Work Dam & Reservoir, Approp 0 0 0 0 22,083,660 OH Cost 0 0 0 0 22,083,660 Maint. Approp. 745,700 920,000 801,407 809,114 10,821,866 Cost 748,984 952,792 777,946 825,859 10,807,402 28 Green River Lake, KY New Work Approp. 0 0 0 0 33,462,330 25 Cost 0 0 0 0 33,462,330 25 Maint. Approp. 11,571,600 1,614,000 1,551,285 1,791,200 27,253,879 26 Cost 1,722,253 1,620,662 1,625,123 1,793,459 27,242,206 26 29 T. Edward Roush New Work Lake, IN Approp 0 0 (481) 0 19,621,777 27 Cost 0 0 0 0 19,621,777 28 Maint. Approp. 621,400 588,000 700,482 1,018,000 12,059,770 Cost 619,904 600,828 687,442 1,023,067 12,046,558 30 Mississinewa Lake, IN New Work Approp. 0 0 0 0 24,379,800 29 Cost 0 0 0 0 24,379,800 29 Maint. Approp. 596,250 704,000 723,000 764,000 11,791,343 Cost 569,460 726,627 736,129 782,897 11,779,326 31 Monroe Lake, IN New Work Approp. 0 0 0 0 16,570,774 so Cost 0 0 0 0 16,570,774 3o Maint. Approp. 639,900 887,000 747,636 736,879 13,240,833 31 Cost. 654,247 881,820 763,458 740,676 13,235,527 31 24-18 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-A CONTINUED COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Fundng 1995 1996 1997 1998 Sep 30,1998 32 Nolin Lake, KY 33 Ohio River Basin Louisville District 34 Patoka Lake, IN 35 Rough River Lake & Channel Improvment, KY 36 Salamonie Lake, IN 37 Taylorsville Lake, KY 39 West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH 40 William H. Harsha Lake, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost $$ $$ 00 0 $ 17,193,278 32 0 $ 17,193,278 "3 1,962,000 1,571,000 1,848,000 1,598,000 35,576,974 34 1,982,479 1,557,497 1,947,062 1,611,785 35,551,862 34 00 00 1,526,142 1,526,142 73,702,816 35 73,316,892 36 476,600 1,050,000 791,240 1,096,526 9,352,244 499,318 1,032,937 792,304 1,128,601 9,347,457 00 10,643,001 37 10,643,001 37 1,758,450 1,715,000 1,714,947 1,873,863 33,385,227 38 1,435,547 1,861,285 1,690,318 1,873,863 33,325,205 38 00 (6,830) 0 17,039,321 39 17,039,321 40 548,400 602,000 659,483 617,988 10,841,191 550,204 628,418 646,972 635,393 10,826,725 292,000 30,000 (104,159) 76,381 338,572 37,949 (13,979) 87,004,456 41 877 87,025,657 42 1,507,550 985,000 921,905 914,000 11,771,579 1,475,546 919,276 1,283,284 940,942 11,758,210 00 00 4,722,463 4s 4,722,463 4 469,500 456,000 445,935 397,882 8,325,220 477,211 464,920 456,745 410,380 8,321,605 00 52,023,157 " 52,023,157 " 734,850 1,152,000 887,510 1,001,145 11,236,292 50 704,208 1,162,244 906,896 1,035,774 11,219,857 50 24-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 1 Includes $85,000 public works funds. 2 Includes $2,000 emergency relief funds, $204,444 "maintenance and operation of dams and improvements of navigable waters" and $3,842,667 expended from 1888 to 30 June 1936, for operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation. 3 Includes $725,715 from Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 4 Includes $316,871 under "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters", and $6,405,372 expended between July 5, 1885 and June 30, 1937 on operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation. 6 Includes $149,700 from Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 7 Includes $1,180,579 in contributed non-Federal funds. 8 Includes $1,004,481 in contributed non-Federal funds. 9 No longer applicable. 10 Includes $550,019 contributed funds. 1 Includes $541,992 contributed funds. 12 Includes $2,224,948 Code 711 funds, $110,107 Code 713 Federal funds and $108,418 Code 713 non-Federal funds. 18 Includes $100,000 Supplemental funds. 14 Includes $326,900 Special Recreation Use Fees. 16 Includes $668,025 "maintenance & operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water". 16 Includes $7,497,492 contributed funds and $100,706 Code 711 funds. 17 Includes $61,451 public work acceleration executive 1963 funds, $143,088 Code 711 funds, and $243,619 Code 712 funds. 18 Includes $52,240 Special Recreation Use Fees. 19 Includes $35,814 Code 711 funds, $113,321 Code 713 funds, and $113,094 contributed funds. 20 Includes $35,814 Code 711 funds, $113,321 Code 713 funds, and $113,094 contributed funds. 21 Includes $76,724 Code 711 funds. 22 Includes $51,854 Special Recreation Use Fees. 23 Includes $6,900,000 of U.S. Forest Service Funds. 24 Includes $19,683 Code 711 funds, $353,995 Code 713 funds, & $353,995 non-Federal contributions in kind for recreation facilities. 25 Includes $133,413 Code 711 funds, $183,732 Code 713 funds, and $40,001 contributed funds. 26 Includes $114,280 Special Recreation Use Fees and $664,025 under "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water". 27 Includes $155,354 Code 713 funds and $193,422 contributed funds. 28 Includes $155,354 Code 713 funds and $193,422 contributed funds. 29 Includes $215,000 Code 711 funds, $174,392 Code 713 funds, $239,200 contributed funds and $174,392 non- Federal contribution in kind for recreational facilities. 30 Includes $1,185 Code 711 funds, $869,158 Code 713 funds, $7,797,604 contributed funds and $870,343 non- Federal contribution in kind for recreational facilities. 31 Includes $54,460 from Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 32 Includes $221,897 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds and $2,594,274 Code 711 funds. 33 Includes $21,897 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds and $2,594,274 Code 711 funds. 34 Includes $204,920 Special Recreation Use Fees and $52,000 Supplement Funds, $527,225 "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water". 36 Includes $20,568,369 contributed funds. 36 Includes $20,266,598 contributed funds. 37 Includes $196,306 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds and $867,396 Code 711 funds, $22,612 Code 713 funds, and $22,612 contributed funds. 38 Includes $236,640 Special Recreation Use Fees and $668,025 under "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water". 39 Includes $315,549 Code 713 funds, $163,867 contributed funds, and $315,549 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities. 40 Includes $315,549 Code 713 funds, $163,867 contributed funds, and $315,549 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities. 41 Includes $4,013,094 contributed funds. 42 Includes $4,022,718 contributed funds. 43 Includes $529,361 Code 713 funds, $50,000 contributed funds, $529,361 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities, and $520,000 non-Federal cost for sewer relocation and dam. 44 Includes $58,571 for preconstruction planning, engineering and design completed before FY 1953. 4' Includes $2,210 "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water." 48 Includes $2,738 "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water." 49 Includes $4,063 "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water." 50 Includes $4,367 "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water." 24-20 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug 11, 1888 GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY (See Section 3 of Text) Purchase of original improvement Mar 3, 1893 1 Construction of Lock 2, Green River Jul 13, 1892 Construction of Lock 5, Green River Jul 13, 1902 Construction of Lock 6, Green River Mar 3, 19052 Appropriated $5,000 for continuing improvements of Green River above mouth of Big Barren River, with provision "That the Secretary of War may, in his discretion, expend such portion of said amount as may be necessary for removal of snags in Nolin River." Mar 3, 1909 Construct new Lock 1 and new Lock and Dam 2, Green River Jul 3, 19302 Construct new locks at Dam 5, Green River and Dam 1, Barren River; modification of Dam 5, Green River, widens bends in Bear Creek, KY Jun 26, 1934 3 Aug 30, 1935 2 Sep 3, 1954 Operation and care of locks and dams with War Department Appropriations for rivers and harbors Improvement of Nolin River Channel enlargement of lower 103 miles of Green River revocation of authorities for improvement of Bear Creek and Nolin River H. Doc 111, 49th Cong., 2d Sess., Ann. Rept. 1887, p.1903 Annual Report, 1891, p. 2439 Annual Report, 1891, p. 2478 S. Doc. 82, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 71st Cong., 1st Sess., and H. Doc. 685, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. H.D. 480, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. S.D. 82, 83d Congress, 2d Sess. Aug 28, 1937 Jun 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Jul 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Jul 3, 1958 OHIO RIVER BASIN (Louisville Dist.) (See Section 27 of Text) Construct levee, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection Flood Control Committee of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin, projects to be selected Document 1, 75th Congress, by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War, at a cost 1st Session not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes Flood Control Committee in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable in discretion of Secretary Document 1, 75th Congress, of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial 1st Session accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50.3 million for local protection works, individual projects to be selected and approved by Chief of Engineers, subject to provision that authorization shall include diversion of Cache River above Cairo, Illinois, and protection of area north of Cairo drainage district by levees at an estimated cost of $2 million Additional $45 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan H. Doc. 504, 78th Congress, for Ohio River Basin, including plan of improvement for flood control 2d Session and other purposes in Kentucky River Basin Flood protection works at Taylorsville, KY at an estimated cost of $129,350 S.D. 105, 78th Cong., 1st Sess. Channel improvement of lower Rough River and Barnett Creek at an H.D. 535, 78th Congress estimated cost of $360,000 2d Session Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan, H.D. 197, 80th Congress including plan of improvement for flood control in Wabash River 1st Session Basin, Illinois, and Indiana, at an estimated cost of $9,629,000 Also, West Fork of Mill Creek at an estimated cost of $1,527,000. H.D. 198, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin, including necessary bank stabilization measures at New Harmony Bridge, Indiana, at an estimated cost of $500,000. Flood control Act of 1958 modified comprehensive plan to provide for H.D. 192, 85th Congress, Monroe Reservoir on Salt Creek, White River Basin, Indiana, at an 1st Session estimated cost to the United States of $4,350,000; cost to local interests, $5,141,000. 24-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 24-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION CONTINUED Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct 23, 1962 Dec 30, 1963 Jun 18, 1965 May 12, 1967 Aug 13, 1968 Jun 19, 1970 Mar 7, 1974 Mar 7, 1974 Aug 13, 1968 Dec 29, 1981 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1988 Nov 28, 1990 Nov 17, 1986 Flood Control Act of 1962 deleted Jessamine Creek Reservoir on Kentucky River, Kentucky, from comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Additional $38 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Fifty-four local protection projects and one reservoir project in comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin were deauthorized August 5, 1977, under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 Two additional local protection projects in comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin were deauthorized November 6, 1977, under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 Directed use of $1,000,000 of funds appropriated in PL 104-46 for construction of the Ohio River Flood Protection, Indiana Project. WABASH RIVER BASIN (See Section 32 of Text) Construction of five multipurpose reservoirs and one local protection project in Wabash River Basin, IL & IN, with provision that construction of Big Walnut Lake, IN, project must be approved by the President. Authorization of $50 million for initiation of partial accomplishment of project Two multiple purpose reservoirs in Wabash River were deauthorized. MIAMI RIVER BASIN, PLEASANT RUN, VICINITY FAIRFIELD, OH Three dry bed reservoirs and a channel improvement were authorized in Section 401 of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986. HAZARD, KENTUCKY Approximately 6 miles of channel improvement were authorized in Section 3 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988. Flood control measures to prevent a January 1957 flood reoccurrance in the vicinity of Hazard, Kentucky at a total cost of $30,000,000 was authorized for design and construction in Section 108 of the Water Resource Development Act of 1990. HOLES CREEK, OHIO The project for flood control, Miami River, Little Miami River, Interim Report No2, West Carrollton - Holes Creek, Ohio: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 23, 1981, at a total cost of $8,910,000, with an estimated first Federal Cost of $6,230,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $2,680,000. H.D. 423, 87th Congress, 2d Session Pub. Law 88-253, 88th Cong., 1st Session Public Law 89-42, 89th Cong., 1st Session Public Law 90-17, 90th Cong., 1st Session Public Law 90-483, 90th Cong., 2nd Session Public Law 91-282, 91st Cong., 2nd Session Public Law 93-251, 93rd Congress, 2nd Session H.D. 3816, 104th Congress, 2nd Session S.D. 96, 90th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 97-128, 97th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 100-676, 100th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 101-640, 101st 2nd Session Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress, 2nd Session 24-22 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-B CONTINUED AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents SALYERSVILLE, KENTUCKY Nov 17, 1986 Flood control measures to prevent a December 1978 flood reoccurrence in the vicinity of Salyersville, Kentucky at a total project cost of $7,000,000 wasauthorized for design and construction in section 401(e)(1) of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986. With respect to the project, Congress has determined that the benefits exceed the cost of such flood control measures. Nov 5, 1990 Provided $400,000 to construct the Salyersville, Kentucky cut-through as authorized by PL 99-662 401(eX 1) in accordance with the Special Project Report for Salyersville, Kentucky, concurred in by the Ohio River Division Engineer on or about July 26, 1989. Aug 17, 1991 Provided $600,000 to continue construction of the Salyersville, Kentucky cut-through as authorized by PL 99-662 section 401(e)(1) in accordance with the Special Project Report for Salyersville, Kentucky, concurred in by the Ohio River Division Engineer on or about July 26, 1989. Sep 12, 1996 Additional $3,000,000 to continue construction of the Salyorsville, Kentucky cut-through. Nov 28, 1990 Sep 25, 1996 Sep 25, 1996 Sep 25, 1996 Sep 12, 1996 FRANKFORT, SOUTH FRANKFORT, KENTUCKY Flood protection in accordance with Plan R-1 of the Louisville District Commander's Re-evaluation Report, dated June 1990 and a executed LCA no later than October 1991 was authorized in Section 102 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990. POND CREEK, JEFFERSON COUNTY, KENTUCKY Provide $10,993,000 to construct the Pond Creek, Jefferson County, Kentucky project for flood control in accordance with the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated June 28, 1994. The major components of the Recommended Plan include detention basin storage and channel enlargement, in addition to wetland restoration and recreation. DUCK CREEK, CINCINNATI, OHIO Provide $11,960,000 to construct the Duck Creek, Cincinnati, Ohio flood damage reduction project in accordance with the Chief of Engineers Report dated June 24, 1994. The project consists of floodwalls/ levees and channel relocation. NEW HARMONY, INDIANA Provide $2,100,000 for streambank erosion protection along the Wabash River at the town of New Harmony, Indiana. WHITE RIVER, INDIANAPOLIS CENTRAL WATERFRONT, INDIANA Provide $7,000,000 for construction of recreation facilities and rehabilititation of existing flood protection features in downtown Indianapolis along the White River. Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 101-514, 101st Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 102-104, 102nd Congress, 1st Session H.D. 3816, 104th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 101-640, 101st Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 104-303, 104th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 104-303, 104th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 104-303, 104th Congress, 2nd Session H.D. 3816, 104th Congress, 2nd Session 'Deficiency act. 2Authorization for Nolin River and Bear Creek revoked by 3Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. Act of Sep. 3, 1954 24-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 24-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 6) For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1998 Full Report See Annual Operation and Name of Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Licking River Rough River, KY Tradewater River, KY White River, IN Completed Completed Completed Completed 1901 1951 1858 1909 $ 13,045 105,500 18,568 119,312 $ 139,108 101,196 33,331 0 24-24 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1998 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project and Status 1 Report Construction Maintenance Local Protection: Completed: Boone County, KY (Ohio River, Rabbit Hash) Brevoort Levee, IN (Wabash River) Brookport, IL Cannelton, IN Canoe Creek, Henderson, KY2 Chaplin River, Perryville, KY2 Cincinnati, OH Covington, KY Dayton, KY Delphi, IN (Wabash River) England Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River) English, IN (Little Blue River)2 Evansville, IN Frankfort, KY (North Frankfort) (Kentucky River) 3 8 Gill Township Levee, IN (Wabash River) Golconda, IL Grassy Creek, Jackson County, IN (Muscatatuck River) 2 Harrisburg, IL Hawesville, KY Indianapolis, IN (Fall Creek Section) (White River) Indian Creek, Corydon, IN 2 Jackson, KY (Kentucky River) Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN Lawrenceburg, IN Lebanon Junction, KY (Salt River) 2 Levee Unit No. 5, Wabash River, IN Levee Unit No. 8, White River, IN Louisville, KY 4 Lyford Levee Unit, IN (Wabash River) Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN (Wabash River)5 Mill Creek, Jefferson County, KY2 Mount Carmel, IL (Wabash River) Muncie, IN (White River) Neon-Fleming, KY (Kentucky River) New Albany, IN New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN (Wabash River) 2 7 Newburgh, IN (Ohio River) 6 Newport, KY Paducah, KY Panther Creek, KY (Green River) 2 Portland, IN (Salamonie River) 2 Reevesville, IL (Cache River) Rochester & McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL (Wabash River) Rosiclaire, IL Saline River & Tributaries, IL Shawneetown, IL 7 Sturgis, KY Taylorsville, KY (Salt River) Tell City, IN Terre Haute (Conover Levee), IN (Wabash River) 7 Town Creek, Harrodsburg, KY 2 Triplett Creek, Morehead, KY (Licking River) 2 Uniontown, KY Vincennes, IN (Wabash River) 7 West Terre Haute, IN (Wabash River) 1977 1954 1958 1959 1957 1965 1987 1953 1972 1965 1997 1979 1948 1960 1953 1959 1955 1953 1964 1957 1959 & 1996 1953 1967 1987 1952 1975 1944 1987 1973 1972 1956 1963 1957 1959 1974 1959 1959 1970 1962 1954 1972 1954 1981 1972 1952 1956 1965 1967 1972 1956 1964 1977 $ 392,443 1,240,299 597,493 2,068,391 1,206,852 832,700 10,150,935 7,862,937 13,177,345 144,563 734,498 372,353 43,906,502 2,960,970 561,200 565,333 70,304 870,015 969,318 1,788,840 300,143 130,952 4,836,361 2,473,414 130,417 7,517,464 700,534 26,721,438 267,391 4,337,617 292,710 1,980,675 887,835 86,532 5,375,471 297,624 52,061 7,512,987 4,761,551 254,031 237,657 600,300 1,079,236 622,544 7,826,219 91,000 1,826,778 378,050 932,229 14,913 56,505 893,094 1,070,926 3,308,941 1,095,704 24-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 24-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS CONTINUED For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1998 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project and Status' Report Construction Maintenance Local Protection: Completed: Vincennes, IN (Wabash River) ' West Terre Haute, IN (Wabash River) Whitewater River, Hagerstown, IN 2 Active: Greenfield Bayou, IN (Wabash River) Indianapolis, IN (Warfleigh Section) (White River) Louisville, KY 9 Miami River Basin, Pleasant Run, Vicinity Fairfield, OH 9 (Great Miami River) West Fork Mill Creek, OH (Winton Road) 9 Inactive: Blue River, Salem, IN Cache River, Upper Basin, Ill Columbus, IN Island Levee, IN (Wabash River) Kentucky River National Recreation Area Licking River, KY Mount Vernon, IN Southwest Ohio Urban Waterfront Development Vincennes, IL (Wabash River) Wabash River, York Township, Clark County, IL West Fork Drakes Creek, TN & KY West Point, KY Whitewater River & Tributaries, IN & OH Deferred: Grayville, IL Reservoirs: Active: Camp Ground Lake, KY (Salt River) Inactive: Big Pine Lake, IN (Wabash River) Big Walnut Lake, IN (Wabash River) Booneville Lake, KY (Kentucky River) Eagle Creek Lake, KY Falmouth Lake, KY (Licking River) Lafayette Lake, IN (Wabash River) Louisville Lake, IL (Wabash River) Mining City Lake, KY (Green River) Red River Lake, KY (Kentucky River) 1All projects are on Ohio River unless otherwise noted. 2 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers under Section 205, 1984 Flood Control Act, as amended. 3 Cost includes $161,098 cash contribution consisting of $105,118 from the City of Frankfort, KY and $55,980 from the Commonwealth of Kentucky. 4 Cost includes $1,716,301 cash contributions from the City of Louisville, KY. b Cost shown are for levee and pump plants. ' The Water Resources Development Act of 1974 modified the Newburgh Locks & Dam project to include the bank protection works at Newburgh Locks & Dam project to include the bank protection works at Newburgh, IN. 7 Partially completed to form a useful unit. Remaining portions of project inactive. 8 Partially completed to form a useful unit. Remaining portions of project are active and inactive. 9 Advance Engineering and Design funded with General Investigations Appropriation. 'oP rimarily recreation project with rehabilitation of existing flood control features. 1"R ehabilitation of existing facilities at six communities along the Indiana shoreline of the Ohio River. 12A uthorized by the Chief of Engineers under Section 14, Streambank Erosion, Flood Control Act, as amended. 24-26 1964 1977 1976 1964 1983 1977 1980 1976 1975 1981 1977 1983 1976 $ 3,308,941 1,095,704 641,398 157,935 153,410 415,000 514,964 477,649 15,000 44,000 283,000 355,963 30,000 58,000 4,490 112,000 235,615 1,270,590 1,009,188 1,038,595 702,471 944,386 1,200,920 2,355,395 350,474 1,794,308 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Flood Control - Local Protection: Adams Levee, IN (Wabash River) - 1978 $ - Alton, IN - 1977 - - Anderson, IN (White River) 1940 1986 5,724 Aurora, IN - 1977 35,420 Bellevue, KY - 1977 19,023 Bonpas Creek, IL (Wabash River) - 1981 - - Bromley, KY - 1977 - - California (Cincinnati), OH - 1977 16,465 Carrollton, KY - 1977 9,713 Caseyville, KY - 1986 - - Cave-in-Rock, IL - 1977 - - Cincinnati, OH (Unit 2) - 1977 - - Cincinnati, OH (Unit 4) - 1977 - - Cleves, OH - 1977 6,343 Clinton, IN - 1977 6,848 Cloverport, KY - 1986 - - Concordia, KY - 1986 - - Deer Creek, Prairie Levee, IN - 1977 - - Derby, IN - 1977 - - Elizabethtown, IL - 1977 - - Evansville, Howell II - 1992 Fletcher & Sunshine Gardens Levee, IN - 1977 3,361 Frankfort, KY (Benson Creek) (Kentucky River) 1979 1992 - - Grandview, IN - 1977 8,497 Honey Creek Levee, IN - 1977 - - Leavenworth, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 1, Eel River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 2, Eel River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 2, East Fork White River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 3, East Fork White River, IN 1938 1977 275 - Levee Unit 1, IL (Wabash River) 1973 1986 60,000 Levee Unit 1, Little Wabash River, IL - 1977 - - Levee Unit 2, Little Wabash River, IL - 1977 - - Levee Unit 2, Wabash River, IL - 1977 - - Levee Units 3 and 4, Wabash River, IL 1938 1977 216 - Levee Unit 6, Wabash River, IL - 1977 9,922 Levee Unit 17, Wabash River Basin, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 1, White River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 7, White River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 9, White River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 10, White River, IN - 1977 - - Lewisport, KY - 1990 - - Louisville, KY (Partial) - 1986 - - Ludlow, KY - 1977 14,503 Madison, IN - 1977 - - Mauckport, IN - 1977 - - Marion, IN (Wabash River) 1979 1986 209,975 McGinnis Levee, IN 1950 1977 71,049 Metropolis, IL - 1986 10,575 Milton, KY - 1977 - - Moscow, OH - 1977 - - New Amsterdam, IN - 1977 - - New Harmony, IN - 1977 - - 24-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 24-G CONTINUED DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Flood Control - Local Protection (Cont'd.) New Richmond, OH - 1977 7,104 Newport-Wilder, KY - 1990 - - Orleans, IN 1972 1977 13,158 Owensboro, KY - 1990 - - Patriot, IN - 1977 - - Prestonville, KY - 1977 - - Raccoon Creek Levee, IN - 1977 - - Rising Sun, IN - 1977 - - Rockport, IN - 1977 - - Rome, IN - 1977 - - Russell and Allison, IL - 1992 52,088 Shawneetown, IL - 1986 25,367 Shoals, IN (East Fork White River) 1938 1977 - - Shufflebarger Levee, IN 1950 1977 64,487 Smithland, KY - 1992 - - Sugar Creek Levee, IN 1961 1977 28,061 Terre Haute, IN - 1977 - - Tolu, KY - 1986 - - Tri Pond Levee, IL 1972 1977 65,510 Troy, IN - 1977 - - Utica, IN - 1978 - - Vevay, IN - 1977 - - Vincennes, IN (Partial) 1964 1986 - - Westport, KY - 1977 - - Wilders, KY - 1990 - - Flood Control - Reservoirs Big Blue Lake, IN 1980 1981 1,079,867 Clifty Creek Lake, IN 1979 1981 1,016,358 Downeyville Lake, IN (Wabash River) - 1992 - - Helm Lake, IL 1976 1981 41,616 Lincoln Lake, IL 1979 1981 1,331,844 Metomora Lake, IN - 1977 - - 24-28 TABLE 24-H NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS PRINCIPAL FEATURES - GREEN & BARREN RIVERS AND KENTUCKY RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEMS Lock Dimensions Miles Greatest Length Lock above Available Upper Depth of Year and Mouth of Distance from Width of For Full Normal Pool Miter Sills Character of Percent Opened to Cost Dam River Nearest Town Chamber Width Lift Elevation Upper Lower Foundation Complete Navigation Lock (feet) (feet) (feet msl) (feet) (feet) CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER - For report on this improvement see this heading under Ohio River. GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY (See Section 3 of Text) Green River New 1 9.1 Spottsville, KY 84.0 600.0 11.8 349.1 12.1 11.3 Shale and Coal 100 1956 2 $5,101,9 New 2 63.1 0.3 miles below Calhoun, KY 84.0 600.0 14.3 363.4 15.0 11.7 Shale 100 1956 ' 4,799,2' 3 108.5 0.3 miles below Rochester, KY 35.8 137.5 17.0 380.4 7.3 5.6 Rock 100 1836 6 121,3 4 149.0 Woodbury, KY 35.8 138.0 16.4 396.8 7.1 6.5 Rock 100 1839 ' 125,7 5 168.1 0.3 miles below Glenmore, KY 56.0 360.0 15.2 412.0 8 12.0 9.3 Piles and Rock 100 1934 * 1,020,8 6 181.7 2.8 miles above Brownsville, KY 36.0 145.0 9.2 421.1 8.0 8.8 Gravel 100 1905 * 168,4 Barren River 1 15.0 11 0.3 miles above Greencastle, KY 56.0 360.0 15.2 412.0 12.0 9.3 Gravel 100 1841 12 871,5 KENTUCKY RIVER, KY (See Section 4 of Text) Kentucky River 1 4.0 3.8 miles above Carrolton, KY 38.0 145.0 8.2 14 430.0 8.2 4.8 Rock and Clay 100 1839 1" 2 31.0 Lockport, KY 38.0 145.0 13.9 443.9 7.6 6.1 Rock 100 1839 19 3 42.0 Gest, KY 38.0 145.0 13.2 457.1 8.6 6.5 Rock 100 1844 16 1,350,3 4 65.0 1.0 mile below Frankfort, KY 38.0 145.0 13.2 470.3 6.4 6.3 Rock 100 1844 - 5 82.2 2.8 miles below Tyrone, KY 38.0 145.0 15.0 485.3 10.0 6.4 Rock 100 1844 '6 7 6 96.2 21.6 miles below High Bridge, KY 52.0 147.0 14.0 499.3 9.4 6.4 Rock and Piles 100 1894 17 314,8 7 117.0 0.8 mile below High Bridge, KY 52.0 147.0 15.3 514.6 9.1 6.8 Rock 100 1897 17 290,7 8 139.9 4.7 miles above Camp Nelson, KY 52.0 146.0 18.7 533.6 10.6 6.0 Rock 100 1900 17 275,4 9 157.5 Valley View, KY 52.0 148.0 17.3 550.6 10.0 6.6 Rock 100 1907 '7 237,64 10 176.4 1.0 mile below Ford, KY 52.0 148.0 17.0 567.6 9.0 6.0 Rock 100 1907 17 221,5( 11 201.0 17.2 miles below Irvine, KY 52.0 148.0 18.0 585.6 10.0 6.0 Rock 100 1906 17 296,59 12 220.0 Ravenna, KY 52.0 148.0 17.0 602.6 9.6 6.0 Rock 100 1910 " 425,6! 13 239.9 2.2 miles below Willow, KY 52.0 148.0 18.0 620.6 9.6 6.0 Rock 100 1915 17 461,4 14 249.0 Heidelberg, KY 52.0 148.0 17.0 637.6 8.6 6.0 Rock 100 1971 17 392,9( 1At normal pool Dam 48, Ohio River, Elev. 337.3, Green River datum (Elev. 338.0 Ohio River datum) 2 New Lock 1 placed in operation May 25, 1956, old Dam 1, completed 1835-40, replaced with new cellular concrete masonry dam constructed 1970-71 with O&M funds at cost of $822,000. 8Does not include $179,110 cost of old Lock and Dam 1. New Lock and Dam 2, placed in operation June 18, 1956. 5 Does not include $295,696 cost of old Lock and Dam 2. 6 Operation discontinued September 30, 1981. 7Breaching of dam on May 24, 1965, stopped through traffic to Bowling Green, KY. s With moveable A-frame crest 3 feet high. 9 Operation discontinued August 1, 1951. to Does not include $179,434 cost of old Lock and Dam 5. 1 1 Distance from mouth of Green River is 164.5 miles. Lock closed to navigation as the result of loss of pool at Green River Lock and Dam 4 on May 24, 1965. 12 Piles in old gravel dam completed in 1934. 1 Includes $729,269 for new large lock completed in 1934. of and Dam 78 s 71 6 77 18 68 10 15 65 is 85 16 47 88 63 46 00 93 93 76 02 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 24-I OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (See Section 33 of Text) LOCAL PROTECTION Estimated Cost Type of Project and Status 1 Construction Federal Non-Federal Total Completed: Barnett Creek, KY (Rough River)3 4 Boone County, KY Brookport, IL 5 6 Cannelton, IN5 7 Cincinnati, OH 5 8 Covington, KY 5 9 Dayton, KY Delphi, IN (Wabash River) 5 10 England Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River) 11 Evansville, IN 4 Frankfort, KY,North Frankfort (Kentucky River) 5 Golconda, IL 6 12 Harrisburg, IL 5 10 Hawesville, KY 6 13 Jackson, KY (Kentucky River) 5 8 Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN 7 Lawrenceburg, IN 6 Louisville, KY 5 14 Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN (Wabash River) 4 5 New Albany, IN 5 8 New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN (Wabash River) 5 ' Newport, KY 5 7 Paducah, KY 5 7 Perryville, KY, Chapin River Reevesville, IL (Cache River) 5 '1 Rochester and McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL (Wabash River) 11 Rough River, KY 3 4 Southwest Jefferson County Sturgis, KY (Tradewater River) 11 Taylorsville, KY (Salt River) 5 16 Tell City, IN 5 14 Uniontown, KY Vincennes, IN 5 17 (Wabash River)(completed portion) 6 West Terre Haute, IN (Wabash River) Active: Frankfort, KY (Kentucky River) South Frankfort 6 Salyersville, KY Inactive: Hazard, KY Channel improvement Bank Protection Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and barrier dam Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Cutoff channel Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee and pump plants Wall and levee Bank Protection Wall and levee Wall and levee Channel Improvement Levee Levee Channel improvement Wall and Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Wall Channel Improvement Channel Improvement $ 144,000 392,443 597,493 2,068,391 10,150,935 7,862,937 13,117,345 144,563 734,498 43,906,502 2,960,970 565,333 870,015 969,318 130,952 4,226,361 2,473,689 25,005,137 4,337,617 5,375,471 297,624 7,512,987 4,761,551 823,700 600,300 1,079,236 654,000 60,077,183 1,826,778 378,050 932,229 1,070,926 3,308,941 1,095,704 8,630,000 9,348,600 $ 18,000 83,000 8,500 29,105 1,309,146 1,051,102 2,013,000 17,164 107,000 5,500,000 272,100 10,900 20,000 42,593 3,000 590,888 284,725 1,716,301 $ 162,000 475,443 605,993 2,097,496 11,460,081 8,914,039 15,130,345 161,727 841,498 49,406,502 3,233,070 576,233 890,015 1,011,911 133,952 4,817,249 2,758,414 26,721,438 109,200 4,446,817 740,000 6,115,471 298,506 232,000 11,000 40,000 100,000 5,000 9,917,000 93,000 63,309 32,707 72,153 285,000 150,000 297,624 7,811,493 4,993,551 834,700 640,300 1,179,236 659,000 69,994,183 1,919,778 441,359 964,936 1,143,079 3,593,941 1,245,704 2,880,000 11,510,000 36 981,400 10,330,000 24-30 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-I CONTINUED OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (See Section 33 of Text) LOCAL PROTECTION Estimated Cost Type of Project and Status ' Construction Federal Non-Federal 2 Total Deauthorized: Adams Levee, IN (Wabash River) 32 Alton, IN 30 Aurora, IN 31 Bellevue, KY 30 Bonpas Creek, IL (Wabash River) 5 33 Bromley, KY 30 California (Cincinnati), OH 3 Carrollton, KY 30 Caseyville, KY 5 34 Cave-in-Rock, IL 30 Cincinnati, OH (Unit 2) 30 Cincinnati, OH (Unit 4) so Cleves, OH 30 Clinton, IN (Wabash River) 30 Cloverport, KY 5 34 Concordia, KY 5 34 Deer Creek Prairie Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Derby, IN 30 Elizabethtown, IL 30 Fletcher and Sunshine Gardens Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Frankfort, KY (Kentucky River) Benson Creek 5 Grandview, IN 30 Greenfield Bayou Levee, IN (Wabash River) 5 35 Honey Creek Levee, IN 30 Island Levee, IN (Wabash River) 5 35 Leavenworth, IN 30 Levee Unit 1, Eel River, IN 30 Levee Unit 1, Little Wabash River,IL 30 Levee Unit 1, White River, IN 30 Levee Unit 17, IN 30 Levee Unit 2, Eel River, IN 30 Levee Unit 2, Little Wabash River, IL 30 Levee Unit 2, White River, IN 30 Levee Unit 6, Wabash River, IL 30 Levee Unit 7, White River, IN 30 Lewisport, KY 5 35 Ludlow, KY 30 Madison, IN 30 Mauckport, IN 30 McGinnis Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Metropolis, IL 5 34 Milton, KY so Moscow, OH 30 New Amsterdam, IN 30 New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN (Wabash River) 57 New Harmony, IN (Wabash River) 30 Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Channel Improvement Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall Levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall Levee Levee Bank Protection Levee $ 292,000 255,000 4,300,000 1,570,000 1,080,000 1,250,000 1,750,000 2,220,000 396,000 661,000 16,800,000 14,900,000 1,240,000 77,000 728,000 590,000 213,000 553,000 559,000 548,000 3,340,000 580,000 4,600,000 653,000 4,630,000 1,470,000 204,000 2,850,000 2,180,000 1,580,000 2,090,000 3,410,000 724,000 1,160,000 1,490,000 610,000 2,540,000 3,820,000 506,000 1,820,000 3,070,000 2,480,000 1,170,000 476,000 664,376 616,000 $ 14,000 40,000 1,190,000 400,000 630,000 925,000 720,000 97,000 35,000 125,000 2,900,000 621,000 67,000 9,000 193,000 55,000 10,000 67,000 153,000 26,000 1,150,000 133,000 1,087,000 32,000 528,000 266,000 40,000 164,000 116,000 118,000 715,000 136,000 73,000 56,000 88,000 243,000 745,000 360,000 105,000 104,000 431,000 41,000 372,000 13,000 99,000 25,000 $ 306,000 27 295,000 5,490,000 1,970,000 1,710,000 28 2,175,000 2,470,000 2,317,000 431,000 786,000 19,700,000 15,521,000 1,307,000 86,000 921,000 645,000 223,000 24 620,000 712,000 574,000 24 4,490,000 22 713,000 5,687,000 23 685,000 5,158,000 23 1,736,000 244,000 3,014,000 27 2,296,000 27 1,698,000 28 2,805,000 3,546,000 28 797,000 27 1,216,000 1,578,000 27 853,000 24 3,285,000 4,180,000 611,000 1,924,000 3,501,000 2,521,000 1,542,000 489,000 763,376 25 641,000 24-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 24-I CONTINUED OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (See Section 33 of Text) LOCAL PROTECTION Estimated Cost Type of Project and Status ' Construction Federal Non-Federal 2 Total New Richmond, OH 30 Wall and levee $ 3,200,000 $ 720,000 $ 3,920,000 Owensboro, KY 5 35 Wall and levee 886,000 195,000 1,081,000 Patriot, IN 30 Levee 753,000 372,000 1,125,000 Prestonville, KY 30 Wall and levee 1,710,000 55,000 1,765,000 Raccoon Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Levee 426,000 37,000 463,000 24 Rising Sun, IN 30 Wall and levee 896,000 280,000 1,176,000 Rockport, IN 30 Wall and levee 466,000 133,000 599,000 Rome, IN 30 Levee 359,000 67,000 426,000 Russell and Allison Levee, IN (Wabash River) 9-37 Shawneetown, IL 6 34 Wall and levee 1,810,000 361,000 2,171,000 Shufflebarger Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Levee 2,380,000 90,000 2,470,000 Smithland, KY 5 35 Wall and levee 864,000 414,000 1,278,000 Sugar Creek Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Levee 418,000 29,000 447,000 24 Tolu, KY 5 34 Levee 303,000 35,000 338,000 Tri-Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River) 30 Levee 2,050,000 191,000 2,241,000 25 Troy, IN 30 Wall and levee 502,000 133,000 635,000 Utica, IN 5 32 Levee 1,570,000 120,000 1,690,000 Vevay, IN 30 Levee 1,170,000 146,000 1,316,000 Vincennes, IN (Wabash River) (Uncompleted Portion) 5 34 Wall and levee 3,340,000 3,340,000 28 West Point, KY 6 34 Wall and levee 3,283,000 400,000 3,683,000 24 Westport, KY 30 Wall 1,610,000 41,000 1,651,00 Wilder, KY 36 Wall and levee 10,800,000 959,000 11,759,000 26 'All projects are on an Ohio River unless otherwise noted. 2 Latest cost estimate revision 1954 unless otherwise noted. 3 Part of Rough River Reservoir and Channel Improvement Project, KY. 4 Details of this project are in individual report. 5 Also see "Other authorized flood control projects." 6 See Annual Report for 1958 for details. 7 See Annual Report for 1959 for details. 8 See Annual Report for 1957 for details. 9 See Annual Report for 1965 for details. 10 See Annual Report for 1953 for details. 11 See Annual Report for 1972 for details. 12 See Annual Report for 1960 for details. s See Annual Report for 1955 for details. 14 See Annual Report for 1962 for details. 16 Substitute project for Belknap, Karnak, and Ullin, IL, complete. See Annual Report for 1954 for details. 16 See Annual Report for 1952 for details. 1' See Annual Report for 1956 for details. 18 Latest cost estimate revision 1988. 19 Latest cost estimate revision 1986. 20 Latest cost estimate revision 1984. 21 Latest cost estimate revision 1983. 22 Latest cost estimate revision 1976. 23 Latest cost estimate revision 1978. 24 Latest cost estimate revision 1960. 25 Latest cost estimate revision 1971. 26 Latest cost estimate revision 1977. 27 Latest cost estimate revision 1961. 28 Latest cost estimate revision 1973. 29 Latest cost estimate revision 1989. 30o Deauthorized Aug 05, 1977 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1971 (P.L. 93-251). 31 Deauthorized Nov 06, 1977 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-251). 32 Deauthorized Oct 03, 1978 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-251). ss Deauthorized May 06, 1981 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-251). s4 Deauthorized Nov 17, 1986 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-251). 35 Deauthorized Jan 01, 1990 under Section 1001 (b)(1), Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). 3' Deauthorized Jul 19, 1992. 1Latest cost estimate revision 1989 unless otherwise noted. 24-32 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-I CONTINUED OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (See Section 33 of Text) RESERVOIRS Estimated Cost Tributary Basin Reservoirs Status Stream Federal Non-Federal Total Great Miami River: Brookville Lake, IN 2 Metamora Lake, IN Green River: Barren River Lake, KY 2 Green River Lake, KY 2 Mining City Lake, KY Nolin Lake, KY 2 Rough River Kentucky 2 Kentucky River: Booneville Lake, KY Buckhorn Lake, KY 2 Carr Fork Lake, KY 2 Eagle Creek Lake, KY Red River Lake, KY Licking River: Cave Run Lake, KY 2 Falmouth Lake, KY Little Miami River: Caesar Creek Lake, OH 2 William H. Harsha Lake, OH 2 Mill Creek: West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH 2 Wabash River: Cagles Mill Lake, IN 2 Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN 2 Monroe Lake, IN 2 Patoka Lake, IN 2 Complete Deauthorized Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Inactive Inactive Complete Inactive Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete East Fork of Whitewater River West Fork of Whitewater River Barren River Green River Green River Nolin River Rough River South Fork of Kentucky River Middle Fork of Kentucky River North Fork of Kentucky River Eagle Creek Red River Licking River Licking River Caesar Creek East Fork of Little Miami River West Fork of Mill Creek Mill Creek Raccoon Creek Salt Creek Patoka River $ 37,905,073 35,300,000 27,371,299 33,238,597 69,100,000 17,193,278 10,620,389 60,700,000 11,766,206 50,854,826 27,800,000 38,551,692 81,162,282 125,000,000 $ 7,497,492 3 $ 45,402,565 35,300,000 4 108,418 5 27,479,717 223,733 13 33,462,330 69,100,000 4 17,193,278 22,612 10,643,001 60,700,000 8 11,766,206 50,854,826 - 27,800,000 14 1,794,308 40,346,000 81,162,282 7 125,000,000 8 62,893,882 5,037,000 9 67,930,882 52,023,157 3,485,840 9 55,508,997 3,622,302 1,100,161 10 4,722,463 4,256,903 6,633,812 7,902,827 53,095,790 113,094 353,995 8,667,947 20,568,369 5 5 11 4,369,997 6,987,807 16,570,774 73,664,159 1Latest cost estimate revision 1989 unless otherwise noted. 2Details of this project given in individual report. 3Cash contributions for water supply storage. 4Latest cost estimate revision 1954. 5For Code 713 recreaton development. 6Latest cost estimate revision 1975. 7Includes $6,900,000 United States Forest Service cost. 8Latest cost estimate revision 1979. 9Reimbursement for water supply storage. 10 Includes $520,800 for non-Federal cost for sewer relocation and dam, $50,000 for contributed funds in fulfillment of project authorization, and $529,361 for Code 713 recreation development. " Includes $7,797,604 cash contribution for storage for low-flow regulation and $870,343 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreational facilities. 12 Includes $14,180,677 cash contribution for water supply storage, and $6,387,692 for initial recreation development. 1s For $183,732 Code 713 recreation development and $40,001 contributed funds. 14 Latest cost estimate 1974 24-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 24-J WABASH RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (FLOOD CONTROL) (See Section 38 of Text) Type of Estimated Cost Construction Project or Stream Status Federal Non-Federal Total LOCAL PROTECTION Marion, IN Wall and Levee Inactive $ 3,900,000 $ 854,000 $ 4,754,000 2 RESERVOIRS Big Blue Lake, IN Big Blue River Deauthorized 87,200,000 53,836,000 3 141,036,000 * Big Walnut Lake, IN Big Walnut Creek Inactive 81,800,000 45,069,000 5 126,869,000 * Downeyville Lake, IN Flatrock and Little Flatrock Rivers Inactive 74,200,000 64,448,000 6 138,648,000 1 Helm Lake, IN Skillet Fork Deauthorized 25,171,000 14,829,000 ' 40,000,000 8 Louisville Lake, IL Little Wabash River Inactive 113,000,000 14,435,000 9 127,435,000 to10 1Latest cost revision 1984 unless otherwise noted. interests for water supply, $8,749,000 reimbursable for 2Latest cost estimate revision 1977. initial recreation facilities. 3Includes $38,190,000 reimbursable by non-Federal 7Includes $12,696,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $15,656,000 reimbursable for interests for water supply and $2,133,000 reimbursable for initial recreation facilities, initial recreation facilities. 4Latest cost estimate revision 1979. 8Latest cost estimate revision 1975. 5Includes $26,663,000 reimbursable by non-Federal 9Includes $8,402,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $18,406,000 reimbursable for interests for water supply and $6,033,000 reimbursable for initial recreation facilities. initial recreation facilities. 6Includes $53,084,000 reimbursable by non-Federal 10 Latest cost estimate revision 1982. TABLE 24-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 41 of Text) Date of Projects Inspection Local Protection Projects Brevoort Levee, IN Brookport, IL Cache River Levee, IL Cannelton, IN Cincinnati, OH Covington, KY Dayton, KY Delphi, IN England Pond Levee, IL Evansville, IN Frankfort, KY, North Frankfort Gill Township Levee, IN Golconda, IL Harrisburg, IL Hagerstown, IN Hawesville, KY Indianapolis, IN Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN Lawrenceburg, IN Lebanon Junction, KY Jul 1998 Aug 1998 Aug 1998 May 1998 Jun 1998 Jun 1998 Jun 1998 Aug 1998 Jul 1998 May 1998 Jul 1998 Jul 1998 Jun 1998 Jun 1998 Jul 1998 Sep 1998 Jun 1998 Jul 1998 Jun 1998 Jul 1998 24-34 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED CONTINUED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 41 of Text) Date of Projects Inspection Levee Unit No. 5, Wabash River, IN Aug 1998 Levee Unit No. 8, Wabash River, IN Jul 1998 Louisville, KY Aug 1998 Lyford Levee, IN Sep 1998 Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN Jul 1998 Mount Carmel, IL Jun 1998 Muncie, IN Sep 1998 New Albany, IN Jul 1998 Newport, KY Jun 1998 Paducah, KY Aug 1998 Perryville, KY Sep 1998 Reevesville, IL Aug 1998 Rochester-McClearys Bluff Levee, IL Jul 1998 Rosiclare, IL Jun 1998 Shawneetown, IL Jun 1998 Southwestern Jefferson County, KY Aug 1998 Sturgis, KY Aug 1998 Taylorsville, KY Jun 1998 Tell City, IN May 1998 Terre Haute (Conover Levee), IN Sep 1998 Uniontown, KY May 1998 Vincennes, IN Jul 1998 West Terre Haute, IN Sep 1998 Channel Improvements Canoe Creek, Henderson, KY Aug 1998 Cypress Creek, McLean County, KY Sep 1998 Eel River, Brazil Waterworks, IN Jul 1996 English, IN (Little Blue River) Jun 1994 Grassy Creek, Jackson County, IN Sep 1995 Harrodsburg, KY (Town Creek) Sep 1998 Indian Creek, Corydon, IN Aug 1998 Jackson, KY (North Fork Kentucky River) Sep 1998 Lick Creek, Hartford City (Blackford County), IN Mar 1995 Mill Creek, Jefferson County, KY Jul 1988 Muscatatuck River, Crothersville, IN Jul 1990 Neon-Fleming, KY (North Fork Kentucky River) Sep 1998 Nicholasville (Town Fork) Vicinity, KY Sep 1995 Panther Creek, Curdsville, KY Sep 1998 Plum Creek, Spencer County, KY Mar 1993 Portland, IN (Salamonie River) Mar 1995 Rough River, Hartford, Ohio County, KY Sep 1995 Salamonie River, Wells County, IN Mar 1995 Saline River and Tributaries, IL Jun 1998 Tripplett Creek, Morehead, KY Sep 1998 Troublesome Creek, Hindman, KY Sep 1998 Wabash River, Adams County, IN Mar 1995 Whitesburg, KY (North Fork Kentucky River) Aug 1998 Bank Revetments Crooked Creek, City Garage, Madison, IN Aug 1995 Crooked Creek, John Paul Park, Madison, IN Aug 1995 East Fork White River, Brownstown, (Jackson County), IN Jun 1993 Eighteen Mile Island, Oldham County, KY Jun 1993 24-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 24-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED CONTINUED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 41 of Text) Date of Projects Inspection Great Miami River, Ice Jam Flooding, Port Jefferson, OH Aug 1995 Great Miami River, Sidney, OH Aug 1995 Green River, Calhoun, KY (River Mile 63.6) Sep 1995 Green River, Calhoun, KY (River Mile 63.4) Sep 1998 Indian Creek, Burton Lane, Morgan County, IN Apr 1995 Licking River, Butler, KY Aug 1995 Lusk Creek, Golconda, IL Jun 1998 Little Miami River, Indian Hill, OH Apr 1995 Little Miami River, Milford, OH Apr 1995 Nameless Creek, Warren County, IN Jun 1995 Ohio River, Brandenburg, KY Jun 1993 Ohio River, Cloverport, KY Sep 1998 Ohio River, Daviess County, KY Sep 1998 Ohio River, Fort Massac State Park, IL Aug 1998 Ohio River, Hawesville, KY Sep 1998 Ohio River, Lewisport, KY Sep 1998 Ohio River, Madison, IN Aug 1995 Ohio River, Moscow, OH Aug 1995 Ohio River, Mount Vernon, IN May 1995 Ohio River, Newburgh, IN Aug 1998 Ohio River, Ohio Street, Evansville, IN Jul 1994 Ohio River, Otter Creek Park, KY Jun 1993 Ohio River, Owensboro, KY Sep 1998 Ohio River, Owensboro Riverport Authority, KY Feb 1995 Ohio River, Rabbit Hash, Boone County, KY Apr 1995 Ohio River, Rockport/Rockport Landing, IN Aug 1998 Ohio River, Sellersburg, IN Sep 1986 Ohio River, SR 66, Cannelton, IN Dec 1993 Ohio River, Troy, IN May 1995 Ohio River, Upper River Road, Jefferson County, KY Jul 1991 Ohio River, Vanderburg County, IN Aug 1998 Patoka River, Jasper, IN Oct 1993 Patoka River, Winslow, IN Jul 1995 South Fork of Wildcat Creek, County Road 7 East, Tippecanoe County, IN Apr 1995 Stoner Creek, North Middletown, KY Jul 1994 Wabash River, near Merom, IN Jun 1995 Wabash River, New Harmony, IN Aug 1998 Wabash River, Terre Haute STP Outfall Sep 1998 Wabash River, Vigo County, County Road 83 West Jun 1995 Wabash River, Vigo County, Little Road Jun 1995 White River, Morgan County, Blue Bluff Road, IN Apr 1995 White River, Petersburg (Pike County), IN Jul 1995 Whitewater River, Levee Road, near Brookville, IN Apr 1995 Wastewater Treatment Plant, Great Miami River, Ross, OH Apr 1995 24-36 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-L FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 43 of Text) Fiscal Year Cost Federal Non-Fed Total Environmental Restoration (Section 1135) Coordination Accounting Fund Falls of Ohio, Wetlands & Fishery3 Hovey Lake, IN 2 Howell Park, Evansville, IN 3 Initial Appraisals ' Little Pitcher Lake, IN 5 Monroe Lake Wetland & Fish Spawning Areas 3 Flood Control (Section 205) Amberley Creek, Cincinnati, OH 2 Asaph's Creek, Standford, KY 6 Beech Fork, Bardstown, KY 4 Bellepoint, Kentucky River, Frankfort 6 Brushy Creek, Lawrence Co. 6 City Dam, Brevoort Levee, IN 4 Coordination Account Deshee River, Brevoort Levee, IN 4 Embarras River, Villa Grove, IL 2 Feather Creek, Clinton, IN 3 Flatrock River, Rushville, IN 4 Hanging Fork Creek, Hustonville 6 Hinkston Creek, Hustonville 6 Indian Creek, Lawrence Co. 6 KY River Lawrenceburg, KY 2 Muddy Creek, Lawrence Co. 6 N. Fork, KY River, Jackson, KY 4 N. Fork Elkhorn Creek, Georgetown, KY 2 Ohio & Cumberland Rivers, Smithland, KY 2 Ohio River, Silver Grove, KY 2 Penitentiary Jones Run, KY 5 Pipe Creek, Alexandria, IN 2 Pogues Run, Indianapolis, IN 2 Rolling Fork River, Lebanon Junction, KY 3 Salt River, Burgin, KY 2 Sugar Creek, Bellbrook, OH 5 White River, Anderson, IN 2 Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14) Big Vermillion River, Eugene Coverd Br. 1 Coordination Account Eagle Creek, Indianapolis, IN 5 Mill Creek, Rd 550W, Park Co. North Fork, Kentucky River, River Road, Whitesburg, KY 1' North Fork, Kentucky River, State Hwy 15N, Whitesburg, KY Ohio River, Carollton, KY ' Ohio River, Daviess Co. Middle Schoool, Owen 1 Ohio River, New Richmond, OH 5 Ohio River, Perry County, IN 1 Whitewater River, Memorial Road, Fayette 1 3,168 34,875 4,856 20,783 6,655 2,328 24,840 22,112 41,096 44,669 2,447 19,239 68,685 14,721 61,565 2,090 48,749 131,300 177 21,000 162 23,112 346 928,936 13,487 19,684 9,671 (-3,879) 3,858 884 78,855 18,414 9,616 66,891 25,836 9,946 4,110 13,602 2,408 3,646 43,813 24,908 (1,658 79,041 12,579 3,168 34,875 4,856 20,783 6,655 2,328 24,840 - 22,112 - 41,096 45,462 90,131 - 2,447 - 19,239 13,305 81,990 - 14,721 9,710 71,274 - 2,090 - 48,749 18,102 149,402 - 177 - 21,000 - 162 - 23,112 - 346 273,328 1,202,264 - 13,487 - 19,684 - 9,671 6,921 3,042 - 3,858 - 884 - 78,855 - 18,414 2,812 12,427 4,722 71,613 (1,641) 24,195 3,682 25,836 9,946 2,469 13,602 2,408 3,646 68,007 24,908 2,024 79,041 12,579 24-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 24-L CONTINUED FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 43 of Text) Fiscal Year Cost Federal Non-Fed Total Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration (Section 206) Coordination Account Fund 4,041 - 4,041 Preliminary Restoration Funds 7 12,530 - 12,530 1 Planning and Design Analysis (PDA). 2 Feasibility Report. 3 Plans and Specification. 4 Construction Funds Received or Construction Underway. 5 Construction Completed. 6 Study Terminated. 7 Preliminary Restoration Plan. 24-38 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-M GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Sections 43, 44, 45, & 46 of Text) Fiscal Year 1998 Cost Projects Federal Non-Fed Total SURVEYS Navigation Studies Ohio River Mainstem, Uniontown, KY, IL, IN $ 2,876,181 - 2,876,181 Flood Damage Prevention Studies Frankfort, Ky 87,477 - 87,477 Licking River Watershed, Butler, KY 94,271 - 94,271 Licking River Watershed, Cynthiana, KY 83,337 - 83,337 Licking River Watershed, Falmouth, KY 93,575 - 93,575 Licking River Watershed, North Fork, KY 79,755 - 79,755 Licking River Watershed, South Fork, KY 78,869 - 78,869 Metro Indianapolis, IN, Indpls. No. Feas Study (8,660) 8,660 0 Metro Lexington 28,246 - 28,246 Metropolitan Louisville, Beargrass Creek, KY 18,240 23,987 42,226 Metropolitan Louisville, Mill Creek, KY 5,464 - 5,464 Ohio River & Trib Recon St. (Metro Louisville S.W.) 91,653 - 91,653 Ohio River, Southeastern, IL 12,201 - 12,201 Panther Creek, KY 7,113 - 7,113 Upper Kentucky River Basin 5,118 - 5,118 Wabash River Basin Comprehensive, IN, IL 52,604 92,992 145,596 Special Studies Great Miami River, Oxbow Area, OH 39,908 - 39,908 Tippecanoe River, Sedlm, IN 6,009 - 6,009 Review of Authorized Projects Green River L&D #6 239,875 - 239,875 Miscellaneous Activities Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 6,152 - 6,152 Intra-Agency Water Resources Development 23,032 - 23,032 North American Waterfowl Management Plan 2,005 - 2,005 Special Investigation, KY 44,916 - 44,916 PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Navigation Project - Lock and Dams Ohio River Greenway, In 52,496 - 52,496 Flood Control Projects - Local Protection Metro Indianapolis, Indianapolis North, IN 197,146 - 197,146 Metropolitan Louisville, Beargrass Creek, KY 210,405 33,746 244,151 Metro Louisville, Pond Creek, KY 1,048 1,048 Metro Region, Duck Creek, OH 92 - 92 South Frankfort, KY 3 - 3 Wabash River, New Harmony, IN 77,615 24,305 101,919 White River Central Waterfront, IN 1,092 - 1,092 24-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 24-M CONTINUED GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Sections 44, 45, 46, & 47 of Text) Fiscal Year 1998 Cost Projects Federal Non-Fed Total COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES Coordination with other Agencies and Non-Federal Interest Coop w/other Water Agencies 5,553 - 5,553 Planning Assistance to States Dam Safety Plan, Hardy Lake, IN 324 - 324 PAS-KY-Jefferson County 25,262 15,805 41,068 PAS Negotiation Funds 432 - 432 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood Plain Management Services Flood Plain Management Services 14,764 - 14,764 Quick Responses 4,012 - 4,012 Rio San Jose 14,713 - 14,713 SS-Gunpowder Creek, KY 24,461 - 24,461 SS-Monterey, KY 24,505 - 24,505 SS-Scott County, IN 18,483 - 18,483 SS-Winchester, KY 48,796 - 48,796 Technical Service, General 50,100 - 50,100 Hydrologic Studies Hydrologic Studies 11,167 - 11,167 24-40 Huntington, WV, District * All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in the text and also appear at the end of this chapter. The Huntington District includes central and southeastern Ohio, all of West Virginia except the northern panhandle and northeastern portion, the eastern portion of Kentucky, a portion of midwestern Virginia, a very small portion of northwestern North Carolina, embraced in the drainage basin of the Ohio River and its tributaries from approximate river mile 127 (below Pittsburgh, PA) to approximate river mile 438, immediately upstream from Foster, KY. The drainage area of the Huntington District is approximately 44,914 square miles. Improvements Page Navigation 1. Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River ..... .................................... 25-2 2. Kanawha River, WV . ................................. 25-2 3. Open Channel Work, Ohio River ................ 25-2 4. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............. 25-2 Flood Control 5. Alum Creek Lake, OH ................................. 25-2 6. Beech Fork Lake, WVVV .................................... 25-3 7. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV .......... 25-3 8. Bumsville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV .........25-3 9. Deer Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH ........... 25-3 10. Delaware Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH .......... 25-4 11. Dewey Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY ................. 25-4 12. Dillon Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH ................. 25-4 13. East Lynn Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ........ 25-5 14. Fishtrap Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY..............25-5 15. Grayson Lake, KY ................... ..................... 25-5 16. John W. Flannagan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, VA .......................... 25-5 17. Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy and Cumberland Rivers, KY, WV and VA .............. 25-6 18. M assillon, OH ................................................ 25-6 19. Muskingum River Lakes, OH ............................ 25-7 20. Newark, OH ................................................... 25-7 21. North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, OH .......... 25-7 22. North Fork of Pound River Lake, VA ............. 25-8 23. Ohio River Basin (Huntington District) ........... 25-8 24. Paint Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH ............ 25-8 25. Paintsville Lake, KY ................................... ..... 25-8 26. R.D. Bailey Lake, W V .................................... 25-9 27. Roseville, OH .......... ............. 25-9 28. Summersville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV......25-9 29. Sutton Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ................ 25-9 30. Tom Jenkins Dam, Ohio River Basin, OH ........ 25-10 31. West Columbus, OH ...................................... 25-10 32. Yatesville Lake, KY ................................ ........ 25-10 33. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................................... 25-11 34. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ........................................ 25-11 General Investigations 35. Surveys ..................... ................................. 25-11 36. Collection and Study of Basic Data ............... 25-11 Tables Table 25-A Cost & Financial Statement .............. 25-12 Table 25-B Authorization Legislation ................... 25-17 Table 25-C OtherAuthorized Navigation Projects..........................25-20 Table 25-D Not Applicable Table 25-E OtherAuthorized Flood Control Projects .................................. 25-21 Table 25-F Not Applicable Table 25-G Deauthorized Projects ...................... 25-22 Table 25-H Inspection of Flood Control Projects.....25-24 25-1 Page Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1998 1. Construction of Locks and Dams on the Ohio River See this heading under Chapter 19 - Ohio River. 2. Kanawha River, WV Location. The Kanawha River is approximately 97 miles in length and is formed by the junction of the New and Gauley Rivers, a short distance above Kanawha Falls, WV, and flows generally northwesterly to the confluence with the Ohio River at Point Pleasant, WV. Previous projects. For details of previous projects see the Annual Reports for 1875, 1915 and 1938. Existing project. The existing project consists of three navigation structures on the Kanawha River. London Locks and Dam are located approximately 83 miles above the mouth of the Kanawha River and approximately two miles downstream from Montgomery, WV. Marmet Locks and Dam are located approximately 68 miles above the mouth of the Kanawha River at Marmet, WV. Winfield Locks and Dam are located approximately 31 miles above the mouth of the Kanawha River at Winfield, WV. Each structure has twin locks with usable dimensions of 56 feetby 360 feet. Another structure, Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam, is located on the Ohio River at approximate river mile 279 and approximately nine miles below Gallipolis, OH. This structure has two parallel locks, the main lock is 110 feet by 1,200 feet. The existing projectwas completed ata cost of $27,853,699. Construction was initiated in 1931 and completed in 1937. This system of locks and dams provides a navigable depth of nine feet from the mouth of the Kanawha River to apoint approximately 91 miles upstream. For further cost details see Table 17-B, see also, Appendix C. Public Law 99-88 authorized the initiation of Engineering and Design and Real Estate Acquisition for Winfield Locks and Dam Replacement. Feasibility studies for modernization have been completed. The plan includes construction of an additional lock chamber (800'x 110') adjacent to the existing locks and continued use of the riverward lock chamber and the navigation dam. The contract for Lock Replacement - Phase I was awarded in April 1990 and is complete. The contract for Construction of Additional Lock and Gate Bay, Phase IIA, was awarded in May 1993 and is complete. The contract for lock replacement, Phase IIB, was awarded in January 1994 and is 99% complete. The full funding estimate for new work is $227,400,000, which is 50 percent Federal cost and 50 percent Inland Water Ways Trust Fund cost. Public Law 104-303 authorized construction of a new lock chamber at Marmet Locks and Dam. The plan includes construction of a new lock chamber (800'x 110') on the right descending bank landward of the existing locks and the continued use of the current twin 360'x56' chambers and the navigation dam. Feasibility studies for modernization have been completed. Pre-construction engineering and design work was completed in September 1997 andrealestate acquisition activities were begun in FY 1998. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are 100 terminals along the Kanawha River located from the mouth of the river to 30 miles east of Charleston, WV. These terminals are constructed principally of steel and wood mooring piles and steel pile mooring cells. Eighteen of these terminals have railroad connections. Five terminals are paved wharves and one is owned by the City of Charleston, WV. The remaining terminals are privately owned. The principal commodities handled are coal, chemicals, acids, cement, gasoline and oil, and sand and gravel. For further details see the 1962 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. The Locks and Dams were operated as required and necessary repairs and improvements were made to the locks and dams as well as to the appurtenant structures and grounds. Channel inspections were conducted periodically. There was no dredging by hired labor on the Kanawha River in FY 97. Dredging by contract on the Kanawha River was 34,271 cubic yards at $237,638. 3. Open Channel Work, Ohio River See this heading under Chapter 19- Ohio River. 4. Other Authorized Navigation Projects See Table 17-C. 5. Alum Creek Lake, OH Location. The damsite is located in Delaware County, OH, on Alum Creek, a tributary of Big Walnut Creek, approximately 26 miles above the mouth of Alum Creek and 15 miles north of Columbus, OH, and approximately 157 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earthfill dam 93 feet in height and 10,000 feet in length with a gate controlled spillway located in the right abutment. The reservoir provides a total storage of 134,800 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 123 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1970 and completed in July 1974. The 405 tracts of land required 25-2 N,Z^' -::s :i:v>r r:,, r. 1:.v;! d!::s .;...r: .,A ;:"i- , < .. s;>.,,.,,;:>;.. Huntington, WV, District for the project have been acquired. The Federal cost of the project was $56,267,422. The Sponsor will reimburse the Governmentan estimated $27,880,000, exclusive ofinterest, for cost allocated to water supply. Local cooperation. For details of required local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations and Maintenance. The entire project is complete. The project was operated for the benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs werp made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated tobe $420,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $75,107,000 in flood damages. 6. Beech Fork Lake, WV Location. The damsite is located in Wayne County, WV, on Beech Fork Creek, a tributary ofTwelvepole Creek, approximately four miles above the mouth of Beech Fork Creek and 20 miles above the confluence of Twelvepole Creek and the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam 86 feet in height and 1,080 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway landward of the left abutment of the dam with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides a total storage of 37,540 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 78 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in December 1972 and completed in February 1977. See also Appendix A. A total of 485 tracts of land were acquired for the project. The total cost of the project was $41,987,500. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and maintenance. The entire project is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $55,000. To date the project has prevented an estimated $17,541,000 in flood damages. 7. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV Location. The damsite is located on the New River in Summers County, WV, approximately three miles above Hinton, WV, and one mile from the confluence ofthe New and Greenbrier Rivers. The reservoir is located in Summers County, WV, and Giles County, VA. Existing project. The existing project consists of a concrete gravity dam 180 feet in height and 2,048 feet in length. Appurtenant structures consist of a gated spillway 790 feetin length located in the channel section of the dam. The stilling pool is formed by a 23-foot-high weir located 364 feet downstream of 16 gated sluices through the spillway section and discharging into the stilling pool. Penstocks were installed at the time of construction to permit the future installation ofhydropower. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 631,000 acre-feet. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam was initiated in January 1942 and completed in April 1952. A total of 338 tracts of land was acquired for the project. The Federal cost of the project was $29,458,652, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. For further details see the 1939 and 1962 Annual Reports. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. The entire project is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $14,151,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $1,593,922,000 in flood damages. 8. Burnsville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV Location. The damsite is located in Braxton County, WV, on the Little Kanawha River, approximately two miles above Burnsville, WV, and 124 miles above the confluence of the Little Kanawha River and the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earth embankment dam 80 feet in height and 1,000 feet in length with a gated spillway in the left abutment. The outlet works is an integral part of the spillway, consisting of five sluice gates and one low flow sluice. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 65,400 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 165 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in June 1973 and completed in February 1976. See also Appendix A. The 357 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. The Federal cost of the project to date has been $57,166,839. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. The project is completed. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated tobe $546,000. To date, the projecthasprevented an estimated $77,924,000 in flood damage. 9. Deer Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH Location. The damsite is located inPickaway County, approximately sevenmiles southofMount Sterling, OH, onDeer 25-3 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1998 Creek, a tributary of the Scioto River, approximately 21 miles above the mouth of Deer Creek and approximately 106 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-filled dam 93 feet in height and 3,880 feet in length, a 741-foot concrete gravity channel section controlled by three tainter gates, an outlet works consisting of five gated sluices through a concrete spillway section discharging into a stilling basin and an earth dike 15 feet by 4,600 feet in a saddle located approximately four miles southwest of the damsite. The reservoir provides a total storage of 102,540 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 278 square miles. Construction of the dam was completed in May 1968. The 138 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. For further project details see the 1965 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost of the project is $20,406,545, including expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. For details of required local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $2,151,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $31,153,000 in flood damages. 10. Delaware Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH Location. The damsite is located on the Olentangy River, approximately six miles above and north of Delaware, OH, and approximately 32 miles above the confluence of the Olentangy and Scioto Rivers at Columbus, OH. The reservoir is located in Delaware, Marion and Morrow Counties, OH. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam with a gate controlled ogee type spillway and five outlet conduits in the channel. The dam is 18,600 feet in length and 92 feet in height. The project provides for storage of 132,800 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 381 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated inApril 1946 and completed in July 1948. For further details see the 1962AnnualReport. See alsoAppendixA. Totalreal estate requirements of 7,703 acres of fee acquisition and 2,428 acres of flowage easements have been completed. The Federal cost for the project was $7,631,821. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for the benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $1,139,000 inflood damages duringthe fiscalyear. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $88,286,000 in flood damages. 11. Dewey Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY Location. The damsite is located on Johns Creek, approximately seven miles southeast of Paintsville, KY, and approximately six miles above the confluence of Johns Creek and the Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earthfill dam 118 feet in height and 913 feet in length, a controlled outlet works discharging through a channel excavated in the left abutment, and a rolled earth-fill dike blocking a low divide to Brandykeg Creek and the Levisa Fork. The reservoir provides a total storage of 93,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 207 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in March 1946 and completed in July 1949. For further project detail see the 1965 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. Total real estate requirements for the project were 12,458 acres in fee and 1,170 acres in flowage easements. The Federal cost of the project was $7,845,547, including expenditures for recreation under the completed project program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction activities are complete. The reservoir was operated for the benefit of flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $1,203,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $61,762,000 in flood damages. 12. Dillon Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH Location. The damsite is located on the Licking River, approximately six miles above the confluence of the Licking and Muskingum Rivers at Zanesville, Ohio. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam 118 feet in height and 1,400 feet in length, a controlled outlet works discharging through a 20- foot conduit in the right abutment, and an ungated 280-foot spillway adjacent to the left abutment of the dam, and two rolled earthfill dikes. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 261,110 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 25-4 Huntington, WV, District approximately 748 square miles. Construction of the dam was completed in July 1959. For further project details see the 1962 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. Total real estate required for the project consists of 8,232 acres in fee and 5,380 acres offlowage easements. See alsoAppendixA. Federal cost of the project was $30,218,135. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated as required for flood control, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $10,283,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $284,014,000 in flood damages. 13. East Lynn Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV Location. The damsite is located in Wayne County, WV, approximately six miles southeast of Wayne, WV, 10 miles above the mouth of East Fork and 42 miles above the confluence of Twelvepole Creek and the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earth-fill dam 113 feet in height and 638 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway near the left abutment of the dam, and a 13-foot reinforced concrete tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 82,500 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 133 square miles. The required 552 tracts of land have been acquired. See also Appendix A. The Federal costs of the project was $85,872,963. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $212,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $63,249,000 in flood damages. 14. Fishtrap Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY Location. The damsite is located in Pike County, KY, on the Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River, approximately 15 miles upstream from Pikeville, KY, approximatelythree miles above the confluence ofLevisa and Russell Forks and 103 miles above the mouth of the Levisa Fork. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rock-fill dam 195 feet in height and 1,100 feet in length, a controlled spillway containing four tainter gates located in the valley wall adjacent to the left abutment of the dam, the outlet works consists of an intake structure with three conduits controlled by slide gates and discharging into a horseshoe shaped tunnel. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 164,360 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 395 square miles. The dam was completed in February 1969. The 1,301 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. The Federal costs for the project was $54,754,126, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $3,700,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $290,764,000 in flood damages. 15. Grayson Lake, KY Location. The damsite is located in Carter County, KY, on the Little Sandy River approximately 49 miles above the confluence with the Ohio River, and 11 miles upstream from Grayson, KY. Existing project. The existing project consists of a random earthfill dam 120 feet in height and 1,460 feet in length, a controlled outlet works discharging though a 14-foot spillway beyond the left abutment. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 119,000 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 196 square miles. The dam was completed in January 1968. The 484 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. Federal costs for the project was $19,162,741, which includes expenditures for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscalyear the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $1,022,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $77,329,000 in flood damages. 16. John W. Flannagan Dam and Rerservoir, Ohio River Basin, VA Location. The damsite is located in Dickenson County, VA, approximately four miles northwest ofHaysi, VA, on the 25-5 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1998 Pound River approximately two miles above the confluence of the Pound River and Russell Fork and approximately 150 miles above the mouth of the Big Sandy River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rock-fill dam 252 feet in height and 970 feet in length, an outlet tunnel located near the left abutment of the dam with a control structure at the upstream end, a spillway controlled by six tainter gates located in a saddle just upstream from the damsite. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 145,700 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 222 square miles. The project was modified to include water quality control by adding control gates to the previously uncontrolled spillway, which increased the total storage capacity by 39,000 acre-feet. The dam was completed in December 1963. The 382 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also AppendixA. The Federalcostforthe projectwas $20,444,383, which includes expenditures for recreation under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and apputenances. Duringthe fiscalyear the projectprevented flood damages estimated to be $2,646,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $155,570,000 in flood damages. 17. Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy and Cumberland Rivers, WV, VA, and KY Location. The Levisa and Tug Forks form the Big Sandy River at Louisa, KY. The Cumberland portion is the Upper Cumberland River Basin above Cumberland Falls, KY. The basin is approximately 100 miles in length and averages approximately 30 miles in width in the lower portion and approximately 10 miles in width above Harlan, KY. The Big Sandy Basin is within the Huntington District, and the Cumberland Basinis within the Nashville District. This report covers that portion of the project located in the Huntington District. Existing project. The authorization language directs the Corps of Engineers to design and construct, at full Federal expense, such flood control measures as are determined to be necesssary and advisable for the communities in the Tug and Levisa Forks and Upper Cumberland River basins. The authorization further states that such flood control measures would be located at or in the vicinity of Pikeville, KY, and Grundy, VA, on the Levisa Fork; Pineville, KY, on the Cumberland River; and Williamson and Matewan on the Tug Fork, in order to afford the named communities and other flood damaged locations and their immediate environs a level of protection against flooding at least sufficient to prevent any future losses from the likelihood of flooding such as occurred in April 1977. The full funding estimate for the project is $1,961,861,000, which includes $114,804,000 non-Federal contributions. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Additional engineering studies are now underway to determine what is necessary and advisable to address the flooding problems in both the Levisa Fork Basin and in the Tug Fork tributary stream areas. The contract for construction of the Pump Station at West Williamson, WV, was awarded inApril 1983 and is complete. The contract for construction of the floodwall at West Williamson, WV, was awarded in July 1986 and is complete. The contract for the Williamson Area Snagging and Clearing was awarded in September 1987 and is complete. The contract for the Williamson Housing Development, Valley View Site, was awarded in September 1987 and is complete. The contract for the Floodwall and Pump Stations for the Williamson Central Business District was awarded in June 1988 and is complete. The contract for South Williamson Housing Development, Pond Creek Site, was awarded in September 1990 and is complete. The contract for Replacement Cafeteria, South Williamson, was awarded in June 1991 and is complete. The contract for Construction of Local Protection Project, South Williamson, Kentucky, was awarded in December 1991 and is complete. The contract for Construction of Local Protection Project, Matewan, West Virginia, was awarded in August 1992 and is complete. The contract for construction of Magnolia High School Ring Wall Levee was awarded in March 1996 and is complete. 18. Massillon, OH Location. The project is located in Stark County, on the Tuscarawas River, approximately 200 miles above the mouth of the Muskingum River. Existing project. The existing project consists of channel improvement to the Tuscarawas River, combined with the construction of drainage facilities, levees and pump stations. For further details see the 1962 Annual Report. Construction was initiated in July 1940 and completed in October 1951. Local cooperation. None required. See the 1962 Annual Report for details of local contribution of work beyond the scope of the project. To date, the system has prevented an estimated $5,711,000 in flood damages. 25-6 Huntington, WV, District Operations during thefiscal year. Routine inspections were conducted to determine that the improved channel was maintained in satisfactory condition. 19. Muskingum River Lakes, OH Location. The Muskingum River lies in Southeast Ohio and including tributaries, drains approximately 8,000 square miles. The headwaters rise abdut 2.5 miles south of Lake Erie and flow into the Ohio River at Marietta, OH, 172 miles below Pittsburgh, PA. Existing project. The existing project consists of the construction and operations and maintenance of 14 reservoirs and appurtenant works in the Muskingum River Basin. The existing project originally authorized by the Public Works Administration in February 1934. Construction of the system was initiated in January 1935 and completed in November 1938. The system was initially operated and maintained by the Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District of Ohio, the sponsoring agency, from July 1938 to August 1939 when operation and maintenance became the responsibility of the Corps of Engineers in accordance with the provisions of the 1939 Flood Control Act. For further project details, see the 1962 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. The cost of the project was $41,247,815, which includes expenditures for recreation facilities under the completed project program. A significant Major Rehabilitation program was approved in December 1977 in order to assure the integrity of the existing 14 structures under the originally designed maximum pool conditions. Underseepage and abutment seepage problems are being corrected through the installation of downstream blankets, toe drains and/or relief wells and grouting. A related but separate program entitled Dam Safety Assurance has been initiated. Under current hydrologic design standards, deficiencies exist in the spillways at the 14 projects in the system. Corrective measures include widening present spillways, constructing new spillways and installing parapet walls on top of the dams have been completed at 7 projects. Seven remaining projects with deficiencies need corrective measures. New seismic criteria will require all dams to be evaluated for seismic deficiencies. If deficiencies are found, corrective measures will be required. Local cooperation. All requirements for local cooperation have been met. For further details see the 1942 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: The Dam Safety Assurance program was initiated during FY 1982. Thus far ten contracts have been awarded and the Dam Safety Assurance program is 50% complete. Operations and Maintenance. The reservoirs were operated for flood control as required, and the necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. The system prevented an estimated $153,775,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the system has prevented an estimated $2,068,781 in flood damages. 20. Newark, OH Location. The project is located in Licking County at the junction of the North and South Forks of the Licking River, approximately 29 miles above the confluence with the Muskingum River at Zanesville, OH. Existing project. For details of the existingproject see the 1981 Annual Report. Construction of the existing project was initiated inJuly 1940 and completedin November 1941. As a result of the 1968 Flood ControlAct the existing project was modified to include improvement of the interior drainage facilities, construction of Log Pond Run diversion channel and modification of the North Fork Channel. Construction of the Log Pond Run diversion channel was awarded in September 1980 and completed in December 1981. The total cost of the project to date is $11,151,232. Local cooperation. For details of required and completed local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: North Fork Channel-As a result of withdrawal of State support for the Utica Lake project (now inactive) and the interdependency of the operation of Utica with the North Fork Channel, the North Fork Channel portion of the project required re-formulation. A reanalysis is complete. Engineering studies continued. The contractfor construction of North Fork Channel (Phase I) was awarded in September 1986 and is complete. The contract for construction of the remaining portion of North Fork Channel was awarded in February 1988 is complete. The contract for Remedial Treatment for Erosion was awarded in September 1991 and is complete. Operations and Maintenance: Routine inspections were conducted to determine that the improved channel was maintained in satisfactory condition. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $3,299,000 in flood damages. 21. North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, OH Location. The damsite is located in Knox County, OH, on the North Branch of Kokosing River, approximately nine miles above the confluence of the Kokosing and North Branch Rivers, and two miles northwest of Fredericktown, OH. 25-7 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1998 Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled-earth dam, 70 feet in height and 1,400 feet in length with an uncontrolled spillway adjacent to the right abutment, and an uncontrolled, reinforced concrete outlet work located in the right abutment of the dam. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 14,885 acrefeet and controls a drainage area of approximately 45 square miles. The 56 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. Construction of the dam was completed in May 1972. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost for the project was $6,665,985, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and the necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. 22. North Fork of Pound River Lake, VA Location. The damsite is located in Wise County, VA, on the North Fork of Pound River, approximately one mile upstream from the confluence of the North and South Forks which form the Pound River and approximately three miles upstream from Pound, VA. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam, 130 feet in height and 600 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway in a saddle upstream from the dam, and an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides a total storage of 11,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 17 square miles. The 127 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. Construction of the dam was completed in January 1966. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost for the project was $6,186,901, which includes expenditures for recreation under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction is complete. The project was operated as required for flood control and the necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $133,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $5,491,000 in flood damages. 23. Ohio River Basin (Huntington District) Location. The work covered by this project consists of a series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements and dams and lakes in the Ohio River Basin within the Huntington District. Existing project. The existing project consists of the individual projects considered in the Ohio River Basin comprehensive plan within the Huntington District. Operations during the fiscal year. The completed local protection projects, which are operated and maintained by local interests, except for those local protection projects for which individual reports have been included. The project prevented an estimated $15,190,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date the project has prevented flood damages of an estimated cumulative total of $903,703,000. 24. Paint Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH Location. The damsite is located in Ross County, OH, on Paint Creek, a tributary of the Scioto River, approximately 37 miles above the mouth of Paint Creek and 100 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River and approximately four miles east of New Parkersburg, OH. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rock and random earth fill dam, 118 feet in height and 700 feet in length, a gate controlled spillway located near the right abutment, an outlet tunnel located in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end, and a random rockfll dike located at the right abutment of the spillway. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 145,000 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 576 square miles. Construction of the dam was completed in July 1973. The 257 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. Federal cost for the project was $26,969,962, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. For details of required local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and the necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. Duringthefiscalyeartheprojectprevented an estimated $1,727,000 in flood damages. To date, the project has prevented flood damages estimated to be $77,164,000. 25. Paintsville Lake, KY Location. The damsite is located in Johnson County, KY, on Paint Creek, a tributary of the Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River, approximately eight miles above the mouth of Paint Creek, and four miles west of Paintsville, KY. 25-8 Huntington, WV, District Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam 153 feet in height and 1,560 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway located southwest ofthe right abutment of the dam, and an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 76,642 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 93 square miles. The 635 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. Construction ofthe dam was initiated in September 1976 and was completed in September 1980. See alsoAppendixA. The total cost ofthe project to date has been $60,194,986. The local sponsor has reimbursed the Government $377,000 for the cost sharing portion of recreation development. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: Construction of the project is complete. Operations and Maintenance. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $108,000. To date, the project has prevented flood damages estimated to be $7,350,000. 26. R. D. Bailey Lake, WV Existing project. The damsite is located in Wyoming County, WV, on the Guyandotte River approximately 108 miles above the confluence with the Ohio River and one mile east of Justice, WV. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled rockfill dam with a concrete face, 305 feet in height and 1,330 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway located in a saddle in the right abutment of the dam, and an outlet tunnelin the left abutment with a control structure located at the upstream end. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 203,700 acrefeet and controls a drainage area of approximately 540 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in November 1973 and completed in December 1979. See alsoAppendixA. A total of 2,109 tracts of land were acquired for the project. The total cost of the project to date has been $261,251,678. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and Maintenance. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscalyear theprojectpreventedflooddamagesestimatedto be $550,000. To date, the project has prevented flood damages estimated tobe $121,232,000. 27. Roseville, OH Location. The project is located in Muskingum and Perry Counties, on Moxahala Creek, approximately six miles the confluence with Jonathan Creek, a tributary of the Muskingum River. Existing project. The existing project consists of 7,291 feet of channel improvement; 6,400 feet of levee and railroad embankment enlargements; and the necessary appurtenances for interior drainage. Total Federal cost of the project was $910,785. Construction was initiated in August 1959 and completed in October 1960. Local cooperation. All requirements for local cooperation have been completed. See also the 1962 Annual Report. Total costs of local requirements were $62,000. Operations during thefiscal year. Routine inspections of the improved portion of the project were conducted to determine that the project was maintained in satisfactory condition. During the fiscal year the projectprevented flood damages estimated to be $15,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $1,212,000 inflood damages. 28. Summersville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV Location. The damsite is located at Ruckers Bend in Nicholas County on the Gauley River approximately 35 miles above the confluence of the Gauley and New River at Gauley Bridge, WV. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam having a height of 357 feet and a length of 2,280 feet, an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure located at the upstream end, an uncontrolled spillway located west of the right abutment and two earthfill dikes. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 413,800 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 803 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam was initiated in March 1960 and completed in March 1966. A total of 9,346 acres of land were acquired for the project. The Federal costs of the project was $48,375,884, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necesssary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the projectpreventedflood damages estimated tobe $1,916,000. Todate, theprojecthaspreventedanestimated $399,235,000 in flood damages. 29. Sutton Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV Location. The damsite is located on the Elk River in Braxton County approximately one mile above Sutton, WV, and 101 miles above the mouth of the Elk River. 25-9 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1998 Existing project. The existing project consists of a concrete gravity dam having a height of 220 feet and a length of 1,178 feet, a gated spillway in the channel section of the dam, comprised of six tainter gates supported by piers, an outlet works comprised of five gate sluices through the spillway section. The reservoir provides for a storage of 265,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 537 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam was initiated in 1949 and completed in June 1960. The total cost of the project was $37,029,585. Local cooperation. None required. See the 1981 Annual Report for contributed funds. Operations during the fiscal year. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $1,486,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $259,449,000 in flood damages. 30. Tom Jenkins Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, OH Location. The damsite is located inAthens County, on the East Branch of Sunday Creek, a tributary of the Hocking River, approximately three miles north of Glouster, OH, and 57 miles above the mouth of the Hocking River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled-earth dam, 84 feet in height and 944 feet in length, acontrolled works discharging through a tunnel in the left abutment, and an uncontrolled spillway in the ridge running south from the damsite. The reservoir, known as Burr Oak Lake, provides for a total storage of 26,900 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 33 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the project was initiated in March 1948 and completed in February 1950. A total of 100 acres of land were acquired for the project. The Federal costs of the project were $2,086,503, which includes expenditure for recreation at completed project. Local cooperation. All requirements of local cooperation have been met. See also the 1962 Annual Report. Contributed funds in the amount of $575,000 have been received from the State of Ohio. Operations during the fiscal year. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control asrequiredandnecessaryrepairswere made tothe structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $1,040,000. To date, the projecthas prevented an estimated $22,098,000 in flood damages. 31. West Columbus, OH Location. The project is located in Columbus, OH, along the Scioto River, adjacent to the downtown area in Franklin County, OH. Existing project The project under construction consists of a 5.2-mile system including levee, floodwall and high ground: Fourteen gate closures, interior drainage facilities and construction of two new pump stations and reworking two existing pump stations. The protected area contains about 1,200 acres and is completely urban with a mix of residential, industrial and commercial development. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; to verify or relocate buildings; utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities where necessary. Pay a cash contribution of at least 5%, as required by the Water Resources DevelopmentAct of 1986, ofthe costs allocated to flood control, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Operations during the fiscal year. Funds to initiate preconstruction engineering and design were appropriated in Fiscal Year 1989 and funds to initiate construction were appropriated in Fiscal Year 1993. The total estimated cost of the project is $127,300,000 of which $28,242,000 is non-Federal. The contract for construction of Dry Run Levee (Phase IA) was awarded in September 1993 and is complete. The contract for construction of Dry Run Levee (Phase IB) was awarded in April 1995 and is complete. The contract for construction of Phase IIA was awarded in March 1996 and is complete. The contract for construction of Dodge Park Pump Station (Phase IIB) was awarded in May 1996 and is 99% complete. The contract for construction of Phase IIC was awarded in August 1997 and is 92% complete. The contract for construction of Phase IID was awarded in July 1998 and is 1% complete. 32. Yatesville Lake, KY Location. The damsite is located in Lawrence County, on Blaine Creek, a tributary of the Big Sandy River, approximately five miles west of Louisa, KY, and 18 miles above the mouth of Blaine Creek. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earth and rockfill dam, 104 feet in height and 760 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway located one-half mile southeast of the right abutment of the dam. The outlet works consists of a 13-foot diameter tunnel through the left dam abutment. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 86,951 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 208 square miles. The 778 tracts of land 25-10 Huntington, WV, District required for the project have been acquired. Construction was completed in May 1995. See also AppendixA. The total cost of the project to date has been $99,453,537. Operations during the fiscal year. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $17, 500,000 in flood damages. 33. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects The Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interest to furnish assurances that they will operate and maintain certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for the administration of these regulations within their respective districts. Maintenance inspections were made during the fiscal year of those completed units transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain the projects in accordance with the standards prescribed by regulations. Total costs for fiscal year 1998 were $126,680. Total cost to September 30, 1998, were $2,369,740. The flood control works inspected and the dates of inspection are tabulated in Table H. 34. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization Emergency bank protection activities pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress are tabulated as follows: Location FY 1998 Cost Kanawha R, US Rt 60, So Charleston, WV $ 4,658 Ohio River, Russell, KY 7,860 Twelvepole Ck, Wayne Co, WV 2,149 Ohio R, Sewer Main, Huntington, WV 24,694 Kanawha R, So Charleston Sewer Main, WV 24,474 US Rt 60, Kanawha R, Spring Hill, WV 1,973 Kanawha R, Kanawha Ave, So Charleston, WV 3,479 Section 14 Coordination Account 13,606 Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 of the 1948 Flood ControlAct, Public Law 853, 80th Congress are tabulated as follows: Location Spring Creek, Spencer, WV Muskingum River, Mansfield, OH Wolf Creek, Barberton/Norton, OH Hargus Creek, Circleville, OH Greenbrier R, Flood Warning System, WV Section 205 Coordination Account FY 1998 Cost $ -646 -36 -8,411 -1,497 276,090 10,835 There were no snagging and clearing activities pursuant to Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress during FY 1998. Work performed under special legislation pursuant to Water Resources Development Act of 1986 as follows: Location Southern WV Environmental Restoration Southern and Eastern Kentucky Kanawha River, St Albans, WV FY 1998 Cost $ 293,602 88,265 1,682 The costs for miscellaneous activities during FY 1998 were $142,323. Flood control and coastal emergency activities pursuant to Public Law 99, 84th Congress were conducted as required during FY 1998 at a cost of $371,442. National emergency management activities were accomplished by the district as required. The costs for these activities during FY 1998 were $56,657. 35. Surveys Fiscal year 1998 costs were $4,665,475 itemized as follows: Location Navigation Studies Flood Damage Prevention Studies Special Studies Comprehensive Basin Studies Review of Authorized Projects Miscellaneous Activities Coordination With Other Agencies Preconstruction Engineering and Design 36. Collection and Study of Basic Data Fiscal year costs were $91,871. FY 1997 Cost $2,971,915 294,224 140,631 91,105 68,646 74,308 77,309 947,337 25-11 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1998 Table 25-A Cost and Financial Statement See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 Sep. 30, 1998 2. Kanawha River, WV (Existing Project) 2. Winfield L&D 2. Marmet L&D 5. Alum Creek Lake, OH 6. Beech Fork Lake, WV 7. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV 8. Burnsville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV 9. Deer Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 8,185,000 9,167,000 7,580,284 7,101,300 8,542,729 9,298,635 7,451,425 7,008,331 27,853,699 1 27,853,699 1 163,978,052 2 163,391,982 2 130,984 3 130,984 3 19,352,000 15,754,000 32,040,000 11,782,000 42,407,008 53,233,788 31,551,852 12,049,325 2,129,000 1,742,629 663,000 724,000 864,165 679,000 678,260 707,886 884,012 681,951 1,092,000 1,029,000 1,061,333 977,150 1,074,138 1,040,178 1,050,172 1,002,919 3,495,000 2,772,100 1,889,601 2,029,450 2,607,353 3,622,657 1,907,565 1,962,929 1,402,000 1,603,000 1,749,019 1,702,535 1,416,959 1,576,218 1,727,904 1,512,084 1,075,000 903,800 681,562 688,949 950,335 1,024,314 664,818 713,089 216,148,000 4 215,590,589 5 2,129,000 6 1,742,629 7 56,267,422 56,267,422 11,847,138 8 11,823,207 8 41,987,500 41,987,500 15,222,032 15,206,768 29,458,652 9 29,458,652 9 31,367,867 0to 31,136,652 0to 57,166,839 57,166,839 22,224,501 "1 21,951,913 11 20,406,545 12 20,406,545 12 12,970,493 13 12,958,684 13 25-12 Huntington, WV, District Table 25-A (cont'd) Cost and Financial Statement See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 Sep. 30, 1998 10. Delaware Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH 11. Dewey Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY 12. Dillon Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH 13. East Lynn Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV 14. Fishtrap Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY 15. Grayson Lake, KY 16. John W. Flannagan Dam & Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, VA 17. Levisa & Tug Forks of the Big Sandy & Cumberland Rivers, KY, WV, & VA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Dam Safety Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 7,631,821 7,631,821 699,000 901,800 689,237 652,300 795,834 939,974 649,172 714,700 1,563,000 1,501,082 335,000 307,026 1,428,000 1,447,981 532,000 655,608 1,434,454 1,386,026 800,000 727,532 1,229,070 1,293,057 782,000 782,016 636,500 1,547,000 866,890 1,038,975 583,538 1,444,813 953,056 1,085,452 1,523,000 1,493,000 2,102,837 1,400,300 1,565,442 1,499,173 2,075,019 1,477,694 1,604,000 1,457,500 1,515,767 1,552,475 1,565,705 1,487,401 1,467,710 1,587,817 1,021,500 926,000 793,867 1,120,800 1,003,257 921,212 769,099 1,139,640 1,595,000 1,488,600 1,381,273 1,076,025 1,596,951 1,551,480 1,274,821 1,171,950 24,490,000 4,629,000 17,338,232 30,050,555 28,892,121 28,930,431 22,473,326 20,377,601 17,667,495 14 17,648,193 14 7,845,547 '1 7,845,547 '5 27,222,747 16 27,196,122 16 2,554,000 2,473,367 30,218,135 17 30,218,135 17 12,257,520 is 12,232,287 18 85,872,963 85,872,963 24,475,688 19 25,462,855 19 54,754,126 20 54,754,126 20 21,759,002 21 21,684,438 21 19,162,741 22 19,162,741 22 17,869,309 17,829,508 20,444,383 23 20,444,283 23 23,963,730 24 23,923,078 24 368,890,787 25 353,316,280 25 25-13 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1998 Table 25-A (cont'd) Cost and Financial Statement See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 Sep. 30, 1998 18. Massillon, OH 19. Muskingum River Dams & Lakes, OH 20. Newark, OH (Previous Project) (Existing Project) 21. North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, OH 22. North Fork of Pound River Lake, Ohio River Basin, VA 23. Ohio River Basin 24. Paint Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. (Rehab.) Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Dam Safety Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. 8,139,406 26 8,139,406 26 -2,000 532 2,000 1,231 -1,056 811 800 777 7,484,000 7,169,400 6,179,000 6,182,225 6,239,207 8,225,879 6,348,250 6,356,653 26,000 205,000 241,000 94,000 229,890 155,548 155,255 234,000 8,641 244,586 37,000 10,720 49,537 11,103 164,000 203,000 219,487 317,000 162,153 199,896 221,997 315,069 395,000 383,300 413,193 308,125 364,950 405,561 394,676 321,317 350,992 350,969 41,247,815 27 41,247,815 27 121,102,328 28 120,879,280 28 982,300 982,300 22,172,945 29 22,172,945 29 27,770,000 27,744,693 845,916 845,916 758,673 758,673 11,151,232 30 11,151,232 30 6,665,985 31 6,665,985 31 3,904,529 3,890,937 6,186,901 32 6,186,901 32 8,586,664 33 8,569,445 33 355,861 34 355,861 34 26,969,962 3s 26,969,962 35 25-14 Huntington, WV, District Table 25-A (cont'd) Cost and Financial Statement See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 Sep. 30, 1998 Approp. Cost 25. Paintsville Lake, KY 26. R. D. Bailey Lake, WV 27. Roseville, OH 28. Summersville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV 29. Sutton Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV 30. Tom Jenkins Dam, OH 31. West Columbus, OH 32. Yatesville Lake, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 675,000 802,900 1,044,601 653,900 675,240 794,418 1,050,060 668,615 -55,000 -1,162 1,092,000 996,000 1,094,643 921,175 1,068,291 1,021,816 1,024,466 998,998 -40,000 -108,085 1,566,000 1,406,000 1,520,494 1,536,372 1,414,289 1,490,472 4,000 1,342 1,265 -927 542 -25,555 42,530 1,404,470 1,474,197 2,700 2,667 1,613,000 1,736,000 1,469,498 1,786,150 1,578,347 1,792,752 1,444,416 1,784,633 1,784,000 1,667,500 1,643,421 1,758,790 1,796,001 1,658,618 1,604,404 1,775,213 378,000 249,900 313,568 248,000 358,797 275,347 274,161 264,812 6,734,000 979,000 7,562,000 14,226,280 4,013,541 10,251,533 8,304,497 9,190,907 716,000 520,806 1,177,000 1,150,118 -488,000 139,948 967,000 1,002,464 -7,000 22,526 1,255,122 1,240,913 6,000 4,473 944,360 997,216 12,336,385 36 12,291,255 36 60,194,986 60,194,986 12,493,450 12,474,697 261,251,678 37 261,251,678 37 24,902,271 38 24,868,995 38 910,785 910,785 245,350 245,317 48,375,884 39 48,375,884 39 31,612,814 40 31,546,175 40 37,029,585 41 37,029,585 41 36,421,856 42 36,339,776 42 2,086,503 43 2,086,503 43 6,941,807 6,907,335 42,841,280 44 37,487,794 44 99,456,500 99,453,537 8,027,932 8,004,428 See page 25-16 for footnotes. 25-15 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1998 'Includes $4,294,612 for new work for previous projects, $4,498,636 Emergency Relief funds, $9,004,800 Public Works funds and $686,317 Code 713 funds. 2Includes $3,883,513 for maintenance of previous projects and $546,090 Maintenance and Operation funds. 3Public Works Acceleration funds. 4Includes $94,054,000 Inland Waterways Trust funds. 5Includes $92,120,545 Inland Waterways Trust Fund. 6Includes $2,129,000 Inland Waterways Trust funds. 'Includes $1,742,629 Inland Waterways Trust funds. 8Includes $1,063 Maintenance and Operation funds. 9Includes $543,960 Emergency Relief funds, $9,698 Public Works Acceleration funds, $211,850 Code 711 funds and $75,000 Code 713 funds. '0Includes $2,795 Maintenance and Operation funds. "Includes $748,281 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 12Excludes $225,090 contributed funds. Includes $590,000 Code 711 funds. '3Includes $130,000 provided by the Productive Employment Act of 1983. "4Includes $240,000 provided by the Productive Employment Act of 1983. '5Includes $23,087 Public Works Acceleration funds, $1,089,940 Code 711 funds and $231,105 Code 713 funds. 16Includes $82,900 Special Recreation Use Fee Funds and $747,028 Maintenance and Operations Funds. "'Includes $100,000 provided from the Productive Employment Act of 1983. '8Includes $1,924 Maintenance and Operations funds. "Includes $209,918 Special Recreation Use Fee Funds and $747,028 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 20Includes $362,649 Code 711 funds and $10,000 Code 712 funds. 21Includes $38,000 Special Recreation Use Fee Funds and $748,714 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 22Includes $406,919 Code 711 funds and $2,317 Code 713 funds. 23Includes $422,983 Code 711 funds. 24Includes $88,710 special recreation use fees. 25Includes Cost from Ohio River Division of $696,000. 26Includes $477,813 contributed funds. 27Includes $27,190,000 National Industrial Recovery funds and $528,288 Code 711 funds. 28Includes $206,815 Maintenance and Operations funds. 29Includes $61,945 Public Works Acceleration funds. 30Excludes $160,082 contributed funds. 31Includes $45,177 Code 711 funds. 32Includes $64,233 Code 711 funds. 33Includes $68,200 special recreation use fees. 34Includes $10,920 Emergency Relief funds. 35Includes $14,153 Code 711 funds. 3Includes $31,496 special recreation use fee funds. 37lncludes $5,534 Consolidated Army funds. 38Includes $60,000 provided from the Productive Employment Act of 1983, and $85,233 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 39Includes $300,062 Code 711 funds. 40Includes $214,112 special recreation use fee funds, $300,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act of 1983, and $82,875 Maintenance and Operation Funds. 41Includes $1,837,337 Code 711 funds and $287,843 Accelerated Public Works funds. Excludes $62,800 contributed funds. 42Includes $267,634 special recreation use fee funds, $215,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act of 1983, and $144,562 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 43Inchdes $8,064 Code 711 funds and $30,000 Public Works Acceleration funds. Excludes $575,000 contributed funds. 44Excludes $3,749,324 contributed funds. 25-16 Huntington, WV, District Table 25-B Authorizing Legislation See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 15, 1985 Oct. 12, 1996 Oct. 23, 1962 6. Oct. 23, 1962 7. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 8. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 9. Jun. 28, 1938 10. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 11. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 12. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 KANAWHA RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, WV Construction of three locks and dams on the Kanawha River and one on the Ohio River. Engineering and Design and Land Acquisition for Winfield Locks and Dam. Construction of 110' x 800' replacement lock to replace 56' x 360' twin lock chambers at Marmet Locks and Dam. ALUM CREEK LAKE, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. BEECH FORK LAKE, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. BLUESTONE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation Deleted Power BURNSVILLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation DEER CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. DELAWARE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation DEWEY LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation DILLON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation H. Doc. 31, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 88, 99th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 303, 104th Cong. (WRDA '96) H. Doc. 587, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 520, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 91, 74th Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. 25-17 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1998 Table 25-B (cont'd) Authorizing Legislation See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 13. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 14. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 Jul. 14, 1960 16. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 Oct. 1, 1980 18. Jun. 28, 1938 19. Feb. 20, 1934 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 11, 1939 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 13, 1968 21. Oct. 23, 1962 EAST LYNN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation. FISHTRAP LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation. GRAYSON LAKE, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. JOHN W. FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, VA Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation. LEVISA AND TUG FORKS OF THE BIG SANDY RIVER, AND CUMBERLAND RIVER, KY, WV Construction of such Flood Control Measures as deemed Necessary and Advisable. MASSILLON, OHIO Construction of Channel Improvement Project. MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OH Construction of 14 Flood Control Reservoirs. Reimbursement to the Muskingum Conservancy District a sum not to exceed actual expenditures for project construction. Operations and Maintenance assigned to the Corps of Engineers. NEWARK, OHIO Construction of Channel Improvement Project. Modification to Existing Project and Additional Channel Improvement and Drainage Facilities. NORTH BRANCH OF KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 440, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sect. 202, P.L. 367, 96th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Works Admin. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 396, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 337, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 220, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. 25-18 15. 17. 20. Huntington, WV, District Table 25-B (cont'd) Authorizing Legislation See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 22. Jul. 14, 1960 24. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 25. Oct. 27, 1965 26. Oct. 23, 1962 27. Jun. 28, 1938 28. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 29. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 30. Dec. 22, 1944 31. Nov. 17, 1986 32. Oct. 27, 1965 33. Jun. 22, 1936 NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VA Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. PAINT CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. R. D. BAILEY LAKE, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. ROSEVILLE, OH Construction of Channel Improvement Project. SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flqod Control Reservoir. Added Recreation SUTTON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation TOM JENKINS DAM, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. WEST COLUMBUS, OH Construction of Local Protection Project. YATESVILLE LAKE, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. INSPECTIONS OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of Local Maintenance of Federally Constructed Local Protection Projects. H. Doc. 645, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 246, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 569, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 762, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 662, 99th Congr. H. Doc. 246, 89th Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 738, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 25-19 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1998 Table 25-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Big Sandy River WV and KY including Levisa and Tug Forks2 1952 1,586,236 1,569,811' 131,473 Elk River, WV3 1903 30,259 Gauley River, WV4 1903 14,761 Guyandotte River, WV6 1915 27,500 Little Kanawha River, WV6 1960 470,536 1,023,854 Muskingum River, OH7 1955 301,912 6,171,897 6,041 New River, WA and VA5 1899 109,691 Scioto River at Portsmouth, OH8 1953 10,951 16,593 'In addition, $140,068 expended from funds transferred from Department of Commerce, under accelerated public works program, for repairs of eroded bank at lock 3 on Big Sandy River, at Louisa, KY. 2Operation and Maintenance suspended June 30, 1952. 3Work closed September 1902. Property transferred to Kanawha River improvements. 4Work closed September 1902. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Congress. 6Work suspended. 6Operation and maintenance suspended June 30, 1951. 7Collections from license non-Federal hydroelectric utilities for use of dams on Muskingum River for fiscal years 1923-1953 were $79,154. 8Private Law 954, August 31, 1954, authorized Secretary of Treasury to pay Portsmouth Sand and Gravel Co. $75,000 in full settlement of claims against Government for damages resulting from change in Scioto River Channel. 25-20 Huntington, WV, District Table 25-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Completed Local Protection Projects Ashland, KY 1954 3,718,839 --- --- Athens, OH 1979 5,313,700 --- --- Cattletsburg, KY 1963 3,854,361 ---- Ceredo-Kenova, WV 1955 2,753,551 ------ Chillicothe, OH 1986 20,373,314 -- --- East Rainelle, WV 1962 614,598 --- --- Galax, VA 1953 480,536 --- --- Huntington, WV 1956 7,172,840 --- --- Ironton, OH 1952 2,604,646 --- --- Maysville, KY 1959 6,493,747 ------ Parkersburg, WV 1955 6,652,827 --- --- Pt. Pleasant, WV 1955 2,919,578 --- --- Portsmouth-New Boston, OH 1956 9,806,424 --- --- Princeton, WV 1962 808,750 ----- Russell, KY 1953 552,493 --- --- Williamson, WV 1964 1,056,166 --- --- Inactive Local Protection Projects Augusta, KY --- 11,577 --- --- Coal River, WV 1979 472,229 --- --- Vanceburg, KY --- --- --- --- Deferred Local Protection Projects Newark, OH (Interior Drainage) 1983 --- --- --- Oceana, WV 1981 611,000 --- Inactive Reservoirs and Lakes Haysi, VA --- 2,656 Deferred Reservoir and Lakes Kehoe Lake, KY 1981 1,272,740 --- Active Authorized Projects with no current year expenditures. Martin, KY 1983 212,048 --- 25-21 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1998 Table 25-G Deauthorized Projects All projects listed in this table have been deauthorized in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974, P.L. 251, 93rd Congress. For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Local Protection Projects Report For Date Expended Expended Aberdeen, OH --- May 1981 1,334 --- Athalia, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Belpre, OH --- Nov 1977 --- --- Brooklyn, WV --- Nov 1979 --- --- Buena Vista, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Chambersburg, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Chesapeake, OH --- Nov 1986 --- --- Cheshire, OH --- Nov 1977 --- --- Chilo, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Clifton, WV --- Aug 1977 11,237 --- Coal Grove, OH --- Jan 1990 3,389 --- Columbus, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Dover, KY --- Jan 1990 --- --- Friendly, WV --- Aug 1977 --- --- Fullerton, KY --- Jan 1990 --- --- Gallipolis, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Greenup, KY --- Jan 1990 4,962 --- Hanging Rock, OH --- Aug 1977 ----- Hartford, WV --- Aug 1977 ------ Henderson, WV --- Aug 1977 --- --- Higginsport, OH --- Oct 1978 --- --- Hockingport, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Letart, WV --- Aug 1977 --- --- Letart Falls, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Lower Guyandotte River Basin, WV --- Nov 1986 17,721 --- Manchester, OH --- May 1981 --- --- Mapleshade, OH --- Oct 1978 --- --- Marietta, OH --- Nov 1981 --- --- Mason, WV --- Aug 1977 --- --- Middleport, OH --- May 1981 9,783 --- Miller, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Millwood, WV --- Aug 1977 -- New Martinsville, WV --- Nov 1979 --- --- New Matamoras, OH --- Aug 1977 -- Newport, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Normal, KY --- Jan 1990 --- --- Pomeroy, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Portland, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Proctorville, OH --- Nov 1986 --- --- Racine, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Ripley, OH --- Oct 1978 7,523 --- Riverview, WV --- Aug 1977 --- -- St. Mary's, WV --- Aug 1977 ------ Sardis, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Sciotoville, OH --- Aug 1977 Sistersville, OH --- Aug 1977 -- South Point, OH --- Nov 1986 -- South Portsmouth, KY --- Jan 1990 -- Syracuse, OH --- Aug 1977 -- Waverley, WV --- Aug 1977 -- Williamstown, WV --- Nov 1979 -- Zanesville, OH --- May 1981 -- 25-22 Huntington, WV, District Table 25-G (cont'd) Deauthorized Projects All projects listed in this table have been deauthorized in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974, P.L. 251, 93rd Congress. For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Local Protection Projects Report For Date Expended Expended Reservoirs and Lakes Big Bend, WV --- Aug 1977 --- --- Big Darby, OH 1969 Nov 1979 3,349,568 --- Birch, WV --- Nov 1986 --- --- Frazeysburg, OH --- May 1981 5,000 --- Leading Creek, WV 1974 Jan 1990 272,880 --- Logan, OH --- Oct 1985 --- --- Millersburg, OH --- May 1981 ------ Mill Creek, OH 1981 Nov 1981 1,602,702 --- Moores Ferry, VA --- Nov 1986 22,879 --- Mud River, WV --- Nov 1979 --- --- Panther Creek, WV 1976 Nov 1986 --- -- Poca, WV --- May 1981 --- "-- Rocy Fork, OH 1950 Aug 1977 91,321 --- Salt Creek, OH 1975 Nov 1986 1,089,943 --- Utica, OH 1975 Jan 1990 757,550 --- West Fork, WV 1974 Jan 1990 663,192 --- White Oak Creek, OH --- Nov 1981 ------ 25-23 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1998 Table 25-H Inspection of Flood Control Projects (See Section 33 of Text) Flood Control Works Inspected Dates of Inspection Ashland, KY Athens, OH Berwind, WV Bramwell, WV Cairo, WV Canton (Nimishillen), OH Catlettsburg, KY Ceredo-Kenova, WV Chillicothe, OH East Rainelle, WV Fishing Creek, Pine Grove, WV Fourpole Creek, Huntington, WV Galax, VA Grahn, KY Griffithsville-Yawkey, WV Hargus Creek, Circleville, OH Hitchins, KY Huntington, WV Inez, KY Ironton, OH Jacksonburg, Fishing Creek, WV Massillon, OH Matewan, WV Maysville, KY Montcalm, WV Mount Vernon, OH Newark, OH Olive Hill, KY Paint Creek at Chillicothe, OH Paint Creek at Washington Court House, OH Parkersburg, WV Pax, WV Point Pleasant, WV Portsmouth-New Boston, OH Prestonsburg, KY Princeton, WV Richwood and Fenwick, WV Right and Left Forks of Beaver Creek, KY Ripley, WV Roseville, OH Russell, KY Smithfield, WV South Williamson, KY South Williamson (Hospital), KY Spencer, WV Utica, OH West Columbus, OH West Union, Middle Island, WV West Williamson, WV Williamson, WV May 98 Aug 98 Jun 98 Dec 98 Oct 98 Sep 98 Dec 98 Jun 98 Aug 98 May 98 Oct 98 Jun 98 Nov 98 Sep 98 Sep 98 Nov 98 Sep 98 Nov 98 NOT INSPECTED Jun 98 NOT INSPECTED Jul 98 Nov 98 Nov 98 Jul 98 Nov 98 Sep 98 Jul 98 Dec 98 May 98 Nov 98 Sep 98 Sep 98 Dec 98 Jul 98 Dec 98 Nov 98 Oct 98 Oct 98 Jun 98 Oct 98 Sep 98 May 98 Sep 98 Apr 98 Aug 98 Mar 98 Nov 98 Sep 98 Oct 98 NOT INSPECTED Oct 98 Nov 98 May 98 Sep 98 Sep 99 May 98 Nov 98 May 98 Nov 98 Sep 98 Nov 98 Apr 98 Aug 98 Sep 98 May 98 Nov 98 May 98 Nov 98 25-24 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT * This district comprises portions of Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Colorado, Nebraska, Iowa, and Missouri, all embraced in the drainage basin of the Missouri River along the main stem and tributaries to Rulo, NE. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE 2. Missouri River Fish & Wildlife Mitigation, IA, NE, KS, & ND 3. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization Page 26-3 26-3 26-3 Flood Control 4. Aberdeen and Vicinity, SD 5. Bear Creek Lake, CO 6. Bowman-Haley Lake, ND 7. Buford Trenton Irrigation District, ND 8. Chatfield Lake, CO 9. Cherry Creek Lake, CO 10. Fall River Basin, SD 11. Logan Creek, Pender, NE 12. Milk River, Malta, MT 13. Missouri National Recreational River, NE and SD 14. Missouri River, Kenslers Bend, NE to Sioux City, IA 15. Nishnabotna River, Hamburg, IA 16. Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lakes, NE 17. Pebble Creek, Scribner, NE 18. Perry Creek, IA 19. Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program (Omaha District) 20. Pipestem Lake, ND 21 Salt Creek & Tributaries, NE 22. South Platte River Basin, CO 23. Thurman to Hamburg, IA 24. Van Bibber Creek, CO 25. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Works 26. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 27. Flood Control Activities Under Special Authorization 26-3 26-4 26-4 26-4 26-4 26-5 26-5 26-5 26-6 26-6 26-6 26-6 26-7 26-7 26-7 26-8 26-8 26-8 26-8 26-9 26-9 26-9 26-9 26-9 Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment 28. Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment Under Special Authorization 29. Boyer Chute, NE 30. California Bend, NE 31. Deroin Bend, MO 32. Hidden Lake/Great Marsh, NE 33. Lower Decatur, NE 34. Wehrspann Lake Aquatic Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration 35. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 36. Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, Missouri River Basin, SD 37. Fort Peck Lake, MT 38. Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, Missouri River Basin, SD 39. Garrision Dam Major Rehabilitation, Lake Sakakawea, ND 40. Garrison Dam-Lake Sakakawea, Missouri River Basin, ND 41. Gavins Point Dam-Lewis and Clark Lake, Missouri River Basin, NE and SD 42. Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, Missouri River Basin, SD and ND 43. Missouri River Between Ft. Peck Dam, MT and Gavins Point Dam, SD & NE 26-1 Page 26-10 26-10 26-11 26-11 26-11 26-12 26-12 26-12 26-13 26-13 26-13 26-14 26-13 26-14 26-14 26-15 Miscellaneous 44. Missouri River Master Water Control Manual Review and Update 26-15 45. National Emergency Preparedness (NEPP) 26-16 46. Flood Control and Coastal Emergency (FC&CE) 26-16 47. General Regulatory Functions 26-16 48. General Investigations (See Table 26-K) 26-16 Tables 26-A Cost and Financial Statement 26-17 26-B Authorizing Legislation 26-24 26-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects 26-29 26-D Not Applicable 26-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 26-30 26-F Other Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 26-32 26-G Deauthorized Projects 26-33 26-H Missouri River Levee System, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE 26-35 26-I Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program 26-36 26-J Inspection of Completed Local Protection Projects 26-37 26-K Active General Investigations 26-41 26-L Flood Control Activities Under Special Authorization 26-43 26-M Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment 26-44 26-2 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT Navigation 1. MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA TO MOUTH (SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE) Location. Channel of the Missouri River extending from Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE. Previous Projects. For details see page 1893, Annual Report for 1915, and page 1175, Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. A navigation channel of 9-foot depth and width not less than 300 feet, obtained by revetment of banks, rock dikes to contract and stabilize waterway, cutoffs to eliminate long bends, closing minor channels, and removal of snags and dredging as required. Construction was initiated on this section of the project (Sioux City to Rulo) in FY 1928, the bank stabilization work was completed in April 1979, and the navigation feature was completed in September 1980. A reliable channel suitable for navigation is available through this section. Controlling depth at ordinary stages of the river is 9 feet, with additional depths available during high stages. Commercial navigation was inaugurated on this section in May 1939, and common carrier transportation service was inaugurated in October 1946. Seven riverside recreation sites are complete and in operation. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) Local Cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-2 of FY 1988 Annual Report. Terminal Facilities. Terminal facilities for loading and unloading grain, liquids and dry bulk products are maintained by private interests at various locations on this section of the river. A complete list of terminal facilities is included in the Missouri River navigation maps and can be obtained from the Omaha District for a small fee. Operations During FY. District personnel accomplished channel reconnaissance, surveys and mapping, engineering and design, surveys and layouts of construction, and supervision and administration. Local interests operate and maintain the recreation sites. Government Hired Labor Forces completed maintenance, which consisted of placing stone on damaged structures and placing structure markers to aid navigation. 2. MISSOURI RIVER FISH & WILDLIFE MITIGATION, IA, NE, KS, & MO Location. The project extends along the Missouri River from Sioux City, IA, to the mouth near St. Louis, Mo. Existing Project. To mitigate a portion of the fish and wildlife habitat losses resulting from the construction and operation of the Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation project. Estimated total cost of the project is $81,400,000 federal funds. Local Cooperation. This project has no cost-sharing sponsor. The entire project is being borne by the Federal government with no cost to either local governments or the affected states. Therefore, no Project Cooperation Agreement is required. Although the four affected states are not participating financially in the project, the states are very actively involved in the planning and design of the project. The states also are participating in the project by furnishing perpetual easements for construction and operation on existing state-owned lands. The states of Missouri and Iowa are the primary donors of such easements. Operations During FY. Efforts continued on acquiring land rights on 29,900 acres of land and agreements with the states for development on 18,200 acres of stateowned land. 3. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Small Navigation Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended, Public Law 645, 86th Congress). No work during the period. Flood Control 4. ABERDEEN, SD Location. This project is in the Moccasin Creek subbasin in the city of Aberdeen, Brown County, South Dakota. Aberdeen is located in the James River Valley in the northeast quarter of South Dakota. 26-3 PUPADT (1F Tl CRiTADV (W TUi ARMV (1N CiVil WArPVQ ACTIvITWQ AD lv 144 Existing Project. The selected alternative is a 100- year event levee 2.9 miles long on the northeast side of Aberdeen that will prevent 49 percent of the average annual flood damages to structures and contents in that area. The proposed levee will essentially block existing drainage to Moccasin Creek, and a combination of culverts with gates and detention ponds were incorporated into the design to mitigate this interior drainage problem. A two foot road raise at Fairgrounds Road is also included. Local Cooperation. Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended applies. The city of Aberdeen and Brown county will be paying the local share of the project. Operations During FY. Preparation of the plans and specifications were completed. 5. BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO Location. The dam site is on Bear Creek in Jefferson County, CO, about 8 miles above the confluence of Bear Creek with the South Platte River at Denver. Existing Project. Earthfill dam 180 feet high, with a crest length of about 5,300 feet; and a supplementary earthfill dike with a height of 65 feet and a crest length of 2,100 feet, to the south of the main dam, and an uncontrolled earth and rock-cut emergency spillway. The lake provides storage capacity of 28,831 acre-feet for flood control and 1,979 acre-feet for sediment and recreation. Construction of the project was initiated in October 1973 and was completed in September 1982, exclusive of recreation facilities. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) Local Cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 21-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Operations During FY. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. 6. BOWMAN-HALEY LAKE, ND Location. The dam site is on North Fork of Grand River in southwestern North Dakota, about 6 miles above Haley, ND. Existing Project. An earth-fill dam 79 feet high, with a crest length of 5,730 feet, and a reservoir with a flood storage capacity of about 72,700 acre-feet, plus 19,780 acre-feet for sediment storage, fish and wildlife conservation, recreation, and future water supply for communities of Bowman, Reeder, Scranton, and Gascoyne, ND. Construction was initiated in July 1964, and the project was completed in 1970. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) Local Cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-2 of FY 1988 Annual Report. Operations During FY. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. 7. BUFORD TRENTON IRRIGATION DISTRICT, ND (LAND ACQUISITION) Location. The Buford Trenton Irrigation District (BTID) is located in the flood plain along the left (north) bank of the Missouri River near its confluence with the Yellowstone River, in Williams County near Williston, ND. Existing Project. The project consists of the acquisition of permanent flowage and saturation easements within and surrounding the BTID for land that has been affected by rising ground water and the risk of surface flooding. There are approximately 70 affected landowners and 90 tracts. Approximately 10,000 acres are irrigable and 1,750 non-irrigable. Acquisition of easements and relocation assistance under P. L. 91-646 began in FY 1998. Estimated project cost is $40,000,000. Location Cooperation. The project is authorized under Section 336 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996, P. L. 104-303. Local cooperation is not applicable. Operations During FY. This FY, five easements were purchased totaling $1,838,300. Appraisal of existing tracts will continue into FY 1999 along with the purchase of additional easements.. 8. CHATFIELD LAKE, CO Location. A dam site on the South Platte River, just below the mouth of Plum Creek, about eight miles upstream from Denver, CO. 26-4 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT Existing Project. Consists of rolled earth-fill dam with a maximum height of 148 feet and a crest length of 12,500 feet; a reservoir with flood control capacity of 204,737 acre-feet and sediment capacity of 26,692 acre-feet, which will be used for recreation; and an enlarged channel from the dam downstream to Denver to accommodate reservoir flood releases. The Corps participated with local interests in acquisition of lands and development of recreation facilities immediately downstream of the Chatfield Dam in lieu of a portion of the channel improvement. Construction of the project was initiated in August 1967 and was physically completed in 1992. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) Local Cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-3 of FY 1993 Annual Report. Operations During FY. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. 9. CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO Location. A dam site on Cherry Creek in Arapahoe County, CO, approximately 6 miles southeast of Denver, CO, just outside of city limits. Cherry Creek joins South Platte River within city limits of Denver, Existing Project. A rolled earth-fill dam with maximum height of 141 feet above streambed and a crest length of 14,300 feet. Project includes a reinforced concrete outlet works and an uncontrolled side channel spillway canal discharging into adjacent Toll Gate Creek. Cherry Creek project provides reservoir storage capacity of 93,920 acre-feet below spillway canal invert and, in addition, a surcharge storage of 134,470 acre-feet. Plan of operation in ultimate development for multiplepurpose uses includes 13,960 acre-feet for sediment storage and 79,960 acre-feet for conservation purposes. Construction began in FY 1946 and was completed in June 1961, exclusive of recreation facilities. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) Local Cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations During FY. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. 10. FALL RIVER BASIN, SD Location. In Custer and Fall River Counties, in and near the town of Hot Springs, SD. Hot Springs unit is in the town of Hot Springs, immediately south of the junction of Cold Brook and Hot Brook which combine to form the Fall River. Cold Brook Lake unit is approximately 1.25 miles north of the town of Hot Springs on Cold Brook, and Cottonwood Springs Lake unit is approximately 4.5 miles west of the town of Hot Springs on Cottonwood Springs Creek, one-half mile upstream from its confluence with Hot Brook. Existing Project. The general plan of improvement provides flood protection for Hot Springs, SD. The Hot Springs channel improvement unit consisted of widening, deepening and straightening 6,000 feet of channel of Fall River. The Cold Brook Lake unit, an earth-fill dam with appurtenant structures, controls an area of 70.5 square miles. The Cottonwood Springs Lake unit consists of an earth-fill dam with appurtenant structures and controls an area of 26 square miles. Construction of Hot Springs unit was completed during FY 1951. Construction of Cold Brook unit dam and appurtenances was completed in FY 1953 with the exception of a road and parking area, which were completed in FY 1955. Construction of the Cottonwood Springs Dam was completed in FY 1970, with the exception of the recreation facilities, which were completed in FY 1972. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) Local Cooperation. Local cooperation requirements have been fully complied with. Operations During FY. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance activities were continued on the Cottonwood Springs and Cold Brook Dams and structures. 11. LOGAN CREEK, PENDER, NE Location. This project is located in northeastern NE, approximately 75 miles north-northwest of Omaha, NE. Pender is located along the right bank of Logan Creek, about midpoint in the Logan Creek basin. Existing Project. The selected plan is a combination levee and floodwall with a detention storage feature. It provides flood protection from Logan Creek as well as 26-5 RVPfT (U THlCElC RTAdV A(U Till? AMV AN CVIl WARI(C ACTIVITlC 1AR lV 14411 incidental benefit from Stage Creek flooding to the Village's residential and industrial area as well as its central business district. The levee extends approximately 15,000 feet in length along the north, east, and south edge of the community, averaging 10 feet in height. Local Cooperation. Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended; Flood Damage Reduction applies. The Village of Pender will be participating in the project's costsharing requirements including real estate interests valued at approximately $1,227,000 and cash of approximately $265,000. Operations During FY. Completion of plans and specifications with award of construction contract in May of FY 1998. 12. MILK RIVER, MALTA, MT Location. This project is located in Phillips County in North Central MT. The city of Malta is located approximately 170 miles northeast of Great Falls, MT. Existing Project. The selected plan is a levee/flood- wall constructed along the right bank of the Milk River to provide protection for the area immediately upstream from the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad (BNSF) bridge. The project consists of an earthen levee that is 1,800 ft in length, combined with a floodwall that extends 1,040 ft. The height of the levee ranges from 4 to 10 ft above natural ground along its entire length. The levee/floodwall requires a tie-off with the existing BNSF grade on the downstream end. Local Cooperation. Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended; Flood Damage Reduction applies. The city of Malta participated in the project's costsharing requirements utilizing a $176,500 grant from the State of MT combined with real estate interests of approximately $282,000. Operations During FY. Construction phase is essentially complete with remaining requirements directed toward project management, coordination with local sponsors and project closeout. 13. MISSOURI NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER, NE AND SD Location. On the Missouri River between Gavins Point Dam and Ponca State Park, NE. This includes Cedar and Dixon Counties in Nebraska, and Yankton, Clay, and Union Counties in South Dakota. Existing Project. The designation as a National Recreational River will preserve outstanding and important scenic values and will provide additional opportunities for river access and recreation use. The project provides erosion control, consisting of bank stabilization and river management techniques designed to preserve the existing environment, and at the same time preserves high bank flood plain lands. Estimated total cost of construction is $21,640,000 (1996) of which $21,000,000 is the Federal cost of construction and $640,000 is the non-Federal contributed funds. Local Cooperation. All recreational construction on this project will be done in accordance with the costsharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. A cost-sharing contract with the state of South Dakota for the Myron Grove access site was signed on June 24, 1986; and the Yankton-Riverside Park Section 215 Agreement was signed on April 24, 1989. Construction was completed in June 1987 and June 1991, respectively. Operations During FY. Efforts to protect Federally listed threatened and endangered species and the drafting of a new General Management Plan (GMP) for this area continued. The GMP, and an accompanying EIS, is scheduled for public release by the National Park Service (NPS) in a draft form in late spring 1999. The Corps and NPS are co-leads for the EIS; the NPS is writing the GMP with assistance from the Corps and other agencies on the Planning Team. 14. MISSOURI RIVER, KENSLERS BEND, NE, TO SIOUX CITY, IA Location. Project is along Missouri River between Ponca Bend, NE, and combination bridge at Sioux City, IA. Existing Project. Construction of dikes, revetments and channel improvement along Missouri River from Miners Bend and vicinity, SD and NE, to Sioux City, IA. Project was started in June 1946 and completed in June 1961. (See Table 26-A for total costs.) Operations During FY. Routine operation and 26-6 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT maintenance activities continued. 15. NISHNABOTNA RIVER, HAMBURG, IA Location. This project, the Nishnabotna River and Main Ditch 6 at Hamburg, IA is located in Fremont County, 40 miles south-southeast of Omaha, NE. Existing Project. The selected plan determined in the feasibility investigations is the construction of a levee approximately 8,300 ft in length along the left bank of Main Ditch No. 6. A range of economically feasible plans were identified from which the city of Hamburg selected and is supported by the Corps. A levee will be constructed along Main Ditch 6 with a levee top, referenced as the 911.0 m.s.l. plan having an accedence equivalent to a 300-year event and a 46 percent reliability passing 500-year event. Selection of a levee height was constrained by the elevation of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad mainline tracks. The BNSF has raised its mainline track approximately 1.5 ft to accommodate the new levee. Local Cooperation. Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended; Flood Damage Reduction applies. The city of Hamburg is participating in the project's cost- sharing requirements utilizing a Community Development Block Grant to help fund real estate interests of approximately $160,000 and cash contributions of $104,000. Operations During FY. Completion of plans and specifications with award of construction contract in July of FY 1998. 16. PAPILLION CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES LAKES, NE Location. The Papillion Creek basin is located in Washington, Douglas, and Sarpy Counties, NE. Big Papillion Creek rises west of Blair and flows southeasterly through metropolitan Omaha. It is joined by the Little Papillion Creek just above Offutt AFB, forming Papillion Creek. The combined creeks flow along the side of Offutt AFB to its confluence with the Missouri River. Existing Project. The active project consists of a series of four dams and reservoirs, channel improvements, an effluent storage facility, and a flood warning system on tributaries of Papillion Creek. Construction was initiated in FY 1972. Completed projects include Standing Bear Lake, Glenn Cunningham Lake, and Wehrspann Lake. Estimated total costs for the project is $68,659,000 consisting of $64,334,000 in Federal funds ($1,367,000 to be reimbursed by the non-Federal sponsor) and $2,958,000 non-Federal other costs and cash contributions. Local Cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 21-6 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Operations During FY. Construction was completed on recreation facilities at Ed Zorinsky Lake, and on the Big Papillion Creek Channel flood control project. The recreational facilities at Zorinsky Lake have been transferred to the City of Omaha for operations and maintenance. The Big Papillion Creek channel flood control project has been transferred to the Papio Natural Resource District for operation and maintenance. 17. PEBBLE CREEK, SCRIBNER, NE Location. Scribner, NE, is located in Dodge County about 47 miles northwest of Omaha. Pebble Creek is a right-bank tributary to the Elkhorn River. Existing Project. The project includes a 3.6 milelong levee along the Elkhorn River with a maximum height of 5 ft (a modification to the original Pebble Creek project), one closure structure at U.S. HWY 275 at the northern edge of Scribner, and several ramps over the two levees. An automated flood warning system was installed that will allow adequate time to operate the closure structure. Both levees are completed which essentially is one ring levee that provides protection for the entire city of Scribner. Local Cooperation. The city of Scribner strongly supported the entire Pebble Creek levee project, including the Elkhorn River levee and its modification. The City obtained cost-sharing assistance from the Nebraska Natural Resources Commission and the Lower Elkhorn Natural Resources District. Operations During FY. Construction of the Elkhorn River levee was initiated in March 1994 with the original contract being completed in December 1995. A modification to the Elkhorn River levee was completed in July 1996. The total cost of the project was $3,232,000. The 26-7 R1P DT (1F TUF CIiW'U1TARV (I Tl ADVU I [N rnII W(1PI(C AA l E FmfEu uEI FV 1 uu non-Federal portion of this totaled was $807,000 which includes $363,000 for lands, easements, and rights-ofway. Final audit and project closeout will occur in FY 1999. 18. PERRY CREEK, IA Location. The Perry Creek basin is located in Woodbury and Plymouth Counties in northwestern Iowa. The downstream five miles of the basin lie within the corporate limits of Sioux City, IA, and drain the central portion of the city. Existing Project. The project consists of 14,800 linear feet of grass and rock lined channel, 1,500 linear feet of new conduit, modification of 710 linear feet of existing conduit, and a concrete stilling basin, to provide capacity for the 100-year event. Also included are 4.25 miles of hiking/biking trail and a basin-wide flood warning system. Estimated project cost is $67,188,000, of which $42,580,000 is Federal cost and $24,608,000 is non-Federal cost. Local Cooperation. The project is authorized under the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. The city of Sioux City, IA, is the local sponsor. Operations During FY. The Phase III construction contract is 50 percent complete and is scheduled to be 100 percent complete by September 2000. The Phase II construction contract will be awarded in April 1999. Plans and specs for Phase IV will be completed by December 1999. 19. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (OMAHA DISTRICT) Location. Flood control improvements in this project are along the Missouri River and several of its principal tributaries and in states comprising the Missouri River Basin. Existing Project. A general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin provides for levees along Missouri River between Sioux City, IA, and mouth and reservoirs on the Missouri River main stem and tributaries. See individual reports and Table 26-I for projects in the Omaha District included in the program. 20. PIPESTEM LAKE, ND Location. On Pipestem Creek in Stutsman County, ND, three miles upstream from where Pipestem Creek joins the James River at Jamestown, ND. Existing Project. The project consists of a rolled earthfill dam approximately 108 feet high with a crest length of 4,000 feet and outlet works of a gated reinforced concrete conduit. The reservoir provides 146,880 acre-feet of storage. The multipurpose pool provides space for silt storage and 885 acres of water surface for fish, wildlife and recreation needs. Construction of the project was initiated in FY 1970 and completed in FY 1977. (See Table 26-A for total construction costs.) Local Cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-6 of FY 1988 Annual Report. Operations During FY. Routine operation and maintenance activities continued. 21. SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE Location. Salt Creek Basin comprises an area of about 1,627 square miles in and around Lincoln in southeastern Nebraska. Existing Project. The authorized project consists of a system of 10 dams and reservoirs, channel clearing, enlarging and realignment, levees and necessary bridge alternations. Pursuant to Senate Resolution adopted August 7, 1964, which authorized a review of the Salt Creek survey report, additional units were placed in "inactive" classification. Construction of the project began in the spring of 1962. All work under the active portion of the project, consisting of the 10 dams and reservoirs and the channel improvements and levees through Lincoln, was completed in 1969. Funds were transferred to the project in FY 1980 with concurrence of Congressional Committees. These funds were used to determine an effective method of correction for the dispersive clay problem in the completed downstream levees through Lincoln. (See Table 26-A for total construction costs.) Local Cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-6 of FY 1988 Annual Report. Operations During FY. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance activities continued. 22. SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, CO 26-8 ,,, f 4i11qI TiI A'lt Itif Ill AAA OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT Location. Flood control improvements in this project are along the South Platte River and its tributaries in Colorado. Existing Project. General plan for flood control and other purposes to provide for construction of Chatfield Lake on the South Platte River, Bear Creek Lake on Bear Creek, and levee and channel improvements on the South Platte River. (See individual reports and Table 26-B for authorizing legislation). 23. THURMAN TO HAMBURG, IA Location. The project area is approximately 110 square miles. It extends from Thurman, IA, on the north to the mouth of the Nishnabotna River on the south and from the Missouri River on the west to the bluffs on the east. Existing Project. The flood problem is caused by flood waters backing up behind the existing levees when drainage structures are closed during high flows on these rivers. Two pump stations have been built to alleviate this flooding in the southern half of the study area. The cost through construction was $1,040,760 Federal and $346,920 non-Federal. Local Cooperation. Fremont County, IA and five drainage districts were the cost-sharing sponsors. Operations During FY. The project was completed in April 1997. Final audit and project closeout will occur in FY 99. 24. VAN BIBBER CREEK, CO Location. Van Bibber Creek is a right bank tributary of Ralston Creek with the confluence in Arvada, CO. The potential project area includes approximately one mile of the downstream portion of the creek located partially in Arvada and partially in Jefferson County. Existing Project. The proposed project would include channel improvements including an underground conduit to convey Van Bibber Creek flood waters to Ralston Creek. Local Cooperation. Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended, applies. Operations During FY. Preparation of plans and specifications continued this FY. 25. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL WORKS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion, in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within the boundaries of their respective districts. Inspections of completed local protection projects which have been turned over to local interests for maintenance and operation during the FY are set forth in Table 26-J, Inspections of Completed Local Protection Projects. FY 1998 costs were $231,759. 26. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Under Sections 7 and 9, Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944, the Corps of Engineers is responsible for detailed scheduling of operations involving storage capacity reserved for or assigned to flood control in reservoirs constructed by the Bureau of Reclamation as well as those constructed by the Corps of Engineers. Costs for FY 1998 were $328,652; and total through September 30, 1998 were $9,038,897. 27. FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Response Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting and Rescue Work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Disasters. On May 28, 1998, the Omaha District responded to the Governor of South Dakota's request for assistance regarding a potentially dangerous long term flooding situation for the community of Waubay, SD. Waubay is located in a closed basin region and rising lake levels were threatening portions of the City. The Corps initially provided technical assistance to the City. On June 12, 1998, a flood fight plan was provided to the City for the protection of their sanitary lift stations. An Advance Measures project was completed on July 31, 1998. The project consisted of an earthen levee, which protects 26-9 WiPAITT (U TI-TV CVCRVTARV (W TI-TV ARMV AN (CIVIL WAlkC A TTVITIVC FVAR VV 1002 about 20 homes from the rising lake levels. On June 14, 1998, the District was involved in Emergency Operations along the Nishnabotna River system located in southwestern IA. On June 15, 1998, the District Emergency Operations Center (EOC) was activated. The District provided flood fight assistance to the cities of Red Oak and Hamburg, IA. The District provided 151,400 sandbags, eight pumps and one sandbag filling machine to aid local authorities in their efforts. The District coordinated State, local and Federal efforts at the Hamburg, IA EOC. The flood threat at Hamburg ended on June 18, 1998. On July 15, 1998, the State of Iowa requested an interagency task force to be convened to coordinate all Federal and State processes. The District participated in a lead role, coordinating the Federal response to eligible applicants. The Corps received 10 requests for rehabilitation assistance under the provisions of P. L. 84-99 from Federal and non- Federal sponsors. Five requests were determined to be eligible for Federal assistance. Operational Program Areas. FY costs as follows: Preparedness: All Hazards Planning Activities................ $ 187,643 All Hazards Training & Exercise............ 65,965 Facilities................................................... 68,059 National Centers of Expertise................ 28,262 Emergency Operations: Response Operations.............................. 185,867 After Action Report.................................. 140,900 Post Flood Response................................ 0 Acquisition of Supplies & Equipment......... 33,208 Support From Others................................. 0 Rehabilitation of Flood Control Works: Rehab. Federal Flood Control Works....... 437,139 Rehab. Non-Federal Flood Control Works. 39,055 Shore Protection........................................ 0 Field Investigations................................ 179,633 Inspections............................. ............... 13,933 Interagency Levee Activities............... 4,026 Advance Measures: Advance Measure Assistance.................... 4,441,681 Field Investigations...................... 40,665 Hazard Mitigation (By State): Hazard Mitigation Team Activities........... 9,207 Emergency Work in Support of Other Federal Agencies. In anticipation of Hurricane Bonnie one individual was deployed to North Atlantic Division on September 15, 1998, as a Missions Officer. The situation did not develop and the standdown order was issued. The employee returned to his duty station on September 18, 1998. The District provided support to Jacksonville District, South Atlantic Division and FEMA National response to Hurricane Georges. On September 26, 1998, the District activated the Temporary Housing Action Officer, and the ESF#3 Forward coordinator. As a result of this hurricane, 24 district personnel were deployed to San Juan, Puerto for missions including, temporary roofing, debris removal and other support activities. Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act as amended, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., June 30, 1948 as amended.) Federal costs for FY 1998 were $110,607 for feasibility studies, $3,046,427 for plans and specifications and construction measures. See Table 26-L for detailed breakdown by project. Emergency Bank Protection (Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., July 24, 1946 as amended.) Operations under this heading were as follows: Federal costs for FY 1998 were $52,276 for projects in the Planning and Design Analysis Phase and $138,625 for projects in the construction phase. See Table 26-L for detailed breakdown by project. Project Modifications For Improvement of Environment 28. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT These project modifications are accomplished under the authority of Section 1135, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662) as amended. Environmental modification efforts during FY 1998 were as follows: California Bend, NE, project cost (Feasibility Phase) $136,570; Hidden Lake, NE, project cost (completion of construction) $62,043; Lower Decatur, NE project cost (Feasibility Phase) $351,728; Boyer Chute, NE, project cost (Post-Construction Monitoring) $9,806; Deroin Bend, MO project cost (Plans and Specs) $166,357; Wehrspann Lake, NE project cost (Plans and 26-10 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT Specs Phase) $158,912. 29. BOYER CHUTE, NE Location. The side channel connecting river mile 633.5 to 637.7 on the Missouri River in Washington County, NE, about 7 miles north of Omaha, NE. Existing Project. The project was constructed from October 1992 to April 1993. Its purpose is to restore flows from the Missouri River into an old river channel, Boyer Chute. This has restored fish breeding, brood rearing, resting and feeding habitat, and will benefit the riverine ecosystem as a whole. The part of the old channel that was previously filled with sediment and grown up in young trees was cleared of vegetation, and a pilot channel for new inflows was excavated through it. Soil excavated from the pilot channel was placed along the channel to be washed away by restored chute flows over time. A 180-foot wide notch in the upstream river bank was constructed for new inflows, and the chute's old outlet at the downstream end was widened. The culvert crossing of a road across the chute was replaced by a bridge, which passes adequate flows to prevent backwater effects and sedimentation. The total cost of about $2,800,000 was 25 percent costshared by a non-Federal sponsor. Local Cooperation. Section 1135 of 1986 WRDA applies. The Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources District provided all needed cost-sharing, including real estate interests valued at approximately $1,000,000 and cash of about $56,000. Operations During FY. A final project inspection was performed on May 3, 1995; and the project was turned over to the local sponsor. FY 1998 efforts included summarizing physical changes, in preparation for project closeout in FY 1999. At such time, an adjustment to the sponsor cash contribution may be required. 30. CALIFORNIA BEND, NE Location. The remnant river channel and floodplain land along river miles 648.5 - 650.0 along the Missouri River, in Washington County, about one mile east of Blair, NE. Existing Project. The project to be modified is the Missouri River Navigation and Bank Stabilization Project. The California Bend modification would restore river flows through the historic river channel adjacent to the navigation channel, to restore fish breeding, brood rearing, resting and feeding habitat, and to benefit the riverine ecosystem as a whole. The downstream end of a 1.5-mile long backwater would be enlarged to provide a permanent connection to the navigation channel, and about 1 mile of excavation would connect its upstream end to the river. This would create permanent flows through about 2.5 miles of channels. Some of the surrounding farmland would be restored to floodplain forest. Also several of the spur dikes along the navigation channel would be lowered to enable navigation flows to create shallow margins along the river. Local Cooperation. Section 1135 of 1986 WRDA applies. The Papio-Missouri Natural Resources District would provide all needed cost-sharing, including real estate interests valued at approximately $255,000, and cash of about $240,000. Operations During FY. Feasibility Studies were continued and will be completed in FY 1999. 31. DEROIN BEND, MO Location. The floodplain land and watered areas riverward of Levee L-536, river mile 516.5 to 521.0 along the Missouri River, in Holt and Atchison Counties, about 2.5 miles west of Corning, MO. Existing Project. The project to be modified is the Missouri River Navigation and Bank Stabilization Project. The Deroin Bend modification would restore a diversity of river flows along this reach of the Missouri River floodplain, to restore fish breeding, brood rearing, resting and feeding habitat, and to benefit the riverine ecosystem as a whole. A flow-through chute would be excavated through the site along remnant channel alignments. This would create permanent flows through about 4 miles of channels. An existing 1 mile long scour lake would be connected to this chute, enabling river fish to access both the restored chute and the lake year-round. The surrounding lands would be restored to floodplain forest. Local Cooperation. Section 1135 of 1986 WRDA applies. The Missouri Department of Conservation would provide all needed cost-sharing, comprised entirely of real estate interests valued at approximately $750,000. The 26-11 RIPflERT A(F THI E L 'RlTAPV AT THIl ARMV AN ('IV! WAI( SA(TWIvTIVl'1 AR 'Iv lon sponsor has already purchased all of the necessary tracts. Operations During FY. Plans and specs were completed this FY. Construction awaits successful execution of a Project Cooperation Agreement between the sponsor and the Corps. 32. HIDDEN LAKE/GREAT MARSH, NE Location. A historic backwater adjacent to Missouri River miles 602.5-603.5, and a nearby marsh, in Sarpy County, about 1 mile south of Omaha and adjacent to Bellevue, NE. Existing Project. The project being modified is the Missouri River Navigation and Bank Stabilization Project. The Hidden Lake modification is restoring a historic backwater of the river to restore fish breeding, brood rearing, resting and feeding habitat, and to benefit the riverine ecosystem as a whole. A one mile long backwater lake which was filled with sediment in a rare flood event has been excavated and reconnected at its downstream end to the river. The Great marsh modification has removed sediment and encroaching plants to deepen and expand a marshy wetland, extending its life and benefiting the aquatic community. About 40 acres of wetland were excavated at an average of two feet deeper, increasing the marsh also in size. Total project costs are $3,020,000, with a Federal share of $2,266,000. Local Cooperation. Section 1135 of 1986 WRDA applies. Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources District provided all needed cost sharing including real estate interests. Operations During FY. Construction was essentially complete and post-construction monitoring continued. 33. LOWER DECATUR, NE Location. The Missouri River's right (west) overbank including side channels, from river mile 684.5 to 689 on the Missouri River in Burt County, NE, about 2 miles southeast of Decatur, NE. Existing Project. Modification of the Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation Project (MRBSN), constructed from 1935 to 1982. Lower Decatur Bend is one of many bend cutoffs (straightenings) created by the Corps during channelization of the Missouri River for navigation and bank stabilization. The proposed project modification includes 3 main offstream aquatic components: side-channel restoration, lowering of the riverward extent of closure spur dikes, and revetment lowering over an extended length to allow river flows to erode the river bank behind the revetment, thereby increasing the top width of the channel over an extended area. An opportunity exists at Lower Decatur Bend to restore the physical habitat to configurations more similar to those that existed prior to the channelization of this reach of the river. Total Project costs are estimated at $6,500,000, with a Federal share of $4,875,000. Local Cooperation. Section 1135 of 1986 WRDA applies. The Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources District would provide all needed costsharing, including real estate interests valued at approximately $568,000 and cash of about $1,057,000. Operation During FY. Feasibility studies were ongoing. 34. WEHRSPANN LAKE AQUATIC Location. The existing Papio Dam #20 and its Wehrspann Lake are located on a tributary to the South Branch Papillion Creek, West Branch Papillion Creek Basin, Sarpy County, NE, about 4 miles southwest of Omaha. The proposed subimpoundment would be located in the headwaters of Wehrspann Lake, within the lake's flood control pool, and within the existing project's boundaries. Existing Project. Wehrspann Lake Aquatic Improvement Project - Modification of Wehrspann Lake, completed in 1984 as Papio Dam #20 for flood control and recreation; Congressional District: NE-2. Wehrspann Lake site is located within Omaha, NE metropolitan area, and as such it is highly visible, heavily utilized and important ecological, recreational, and educational resource. The proposed modification, a subimpoundment in the lake's flood control pool, would play an essential role in maintaining water quality and fish habitat within Wehrspann Lake, by decreasing the amounts of influent nutrients and especially sediment. Total project costs are currently estimated at $2,179,000 with a Federal share of $1,634,000. Local Cooperation. Section 1135 of 1986 WRDA 26-12 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT applies. Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources District would provide all needed cost sharing including real estate interests. Operations During FY. Project design (plans and specs) were initiated. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration 35. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION Project restoration are accomplished under the authority of Section 206, Water Resource Development Act of 1996, (P. L. 104-303) as amended. Restoration efforts during FY 1998 consisted of one project, the first Section 206 project authorized for study nationwide; Nathan's Lake in NE. Federal cost for FY 1998 to initiate the Planning and Design Analysis Phase was $71,192. Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 36. BIG BEND DAM-LAKE SHARPE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD Location. On the Missouri River, 987.4 miles above the mouth, near Fort Thompson, SD, and approximately 20 miles upstream from Chamberlain, SD. Dam is located in the upstream reach of Fort Randall reservoir (Lake Francis Case). Big Bend reservoir (Lake Sharpe) extends upstream to Pierre, SD. Existing Project. A rolled earth-fill dam 95 feet high, with a crest length of 10,570 feet, a hydroelectric generating plant consisting of five 58,500 kilowatt units, three 67,276 kilowatt units, and a chute-type gated spillway. Reservoir provides gross storage of 1,859,000 acre-feet. Federal cost of the project was $107,498,000. Construction began in September 1959 and was completed in September 1977, except for Code 710 recreation facilities. Local Cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operation During FY. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, power production and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the FY. During the period, 1,243,738,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity were produced. 37. FORT PECK DAM AND LAKE, MT Location. The reservoir is in the Missouri River Valley in McCone, Valley, Garfield, Phillips, Petroleum, and Fergus Counties, MT. Dam is approximately 1,771.6 miles above the mouth of the Missouri River. Nearest towns are Glasgow, 17 miles northwest; and Nashua, nine miles north. Existing Project. A hydraulic earthfill dam with a maximum height of 251 feet, with a crest length of 21,026 feet, and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 18,688,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. Work started on the original project in October 1933 and on the second power plant in August 1956. The project was completed in 1965. The power installations at the project were uprated in FY 1979. The five generators have a total output of 185,250 KW: two generators at 40,000 KW each, two generators at 43,500 KW each and one generator at 18,250 KW. See page 818 of 1965 Annual Report and page 905 of 1958 Annual Report for project details. Federal cost of the project was $158,428,000, Local Cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations During FY. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with the other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the FY. Generating facilities produced 1,148,980,000 net kilowatt hours of electricity. 38. FORT RANDALL DAM-LAKE FRANCIS CASE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD Location. Located on the Missouri River in Charles Mix and Gregory Counties, SD, about 82 miles above Yankton, SD. Site is 880 miles above the mouth of the Missouri River and 148 miles above Sioux City, IA. Existing Project. A rolled earth-fill dam with a 26-13 RVP lDT (Ui THi cirR1f'TARV (I TUil ARMV AN CViWl. Wl H QACTTVITWQiT R 1'V 14O1 maximum height of 165 feet; a crest length of 10,700 feet; and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 5,494,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. The power installation consists of eight units rated at 40,000 kilowatts each. Construction began in May 1946 and was completed in 1969, except for Code 710 recreation facilities. Federal cost of the project was $199,066,000. Non-Federal contribution for constructing approaches to the Platte-Winner Bridge was $720,000. Local Cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing and bridge approaches. Operations During FY. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the FY. Generating facilities produced 2,006,459,000 net kilowatt hours of electricity. 39. GARRISON DAM MAJOR REHABILITATION, LAKE SAKAKAWEA, ND Location. Located on the Missouri River in McLean and Mercer Counties, ND, about 11 miles south of Garrison, ND, and 9 miles west of Coleharbor, ND, 1,389.9 miles about the mouth and 75 miles above Bismarck. Existing Project. Garrison Dam is a multi-purpose project consisting of a rolled earth-filled dam with a sheet pile cutoff, a hydroelectric power plant, and a reservoir with storage capacity of 23,821,000 acre feet for flood control, navigation, power, recreation, irrigation, and municipal water supply. This major rehabilitation project will replace the turbine runners on all five existing units with new runners designed to improve reliability and maximize efficiency over a broad range of operating conditions for a total project cost of $37,100,000. Local Cooperation. None required. Operations During FY. Continued design and initiated construction resulting in five new contract awards for turbine runner replacement (with options to rewind two generators), recondition governors, provide new set bulkheads and recondition cranes. 40. GARRISON DAM-LAKE SAKAKAWEA, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, ND Location. Located on the Missouri River in McLean and Mercer Counties, ND, about 11 miles south of Garrison, ND, and 9 miles west of Coleharbor, ND. 1,389.9 miles above the mouth and 75 miles above Bismarck, ND. Existing Project. A rolled earth-fill dam 11,300 feet long with a maximum height of 210 feet, and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 23,821,000 acre-feet. It provides five power units (three units rated at 109,250 kilowatts each and two units rated at 95,000 kilowatts each), three flood control tunnels, and a gated spillway. Federal cost of the project was $299,938,000, including $4,208,000 for major rehabilitation. Non-Federal contribution in connection with widening Snake Creek Embankment was $687,000. Construction of the project was initiated in April 1946 and completed in 1966, except for recreational development using Code 710 funds. Local Cooperation. None required except costsharing with the state of North Dakota for widening the Snake Creek Embankment and recreation cost-sharing. Operations During FY. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the FY. Generating facilities produced 2,655,838,000 net kilowatt hours of electricity. 41. GAVINS POINT DAM-LEWIS AND CLARK LAKE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, NE AND SD Location. On the Missouri River in Yankton County, SD, and Knox County, NE, about four miles upstream from Yankton, SD, and 811.1 miles above the mouth. Existing Project. A concrete and rolled earth-fill dam with a maximum height of 74 feet, and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 492,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. The power installation consists of three units rated at 44,099 kilowatts each. Federal cost of the project was $49,617,000. Construction of the original project was initiated in March 1952 and 26-14 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT completed in 1964. Local Cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations During FY. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the FY. Generating facilities produced 830,784,000 net kilowatt hours of electricity during FY. 42. OAHE DAM-LAKE OAHE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD AND ND Location. Dam is on the Missouri River in Hughes and Stanley Counties, SD, about six miles northwest of Pierre, SD, and 1,072.3 miles above the mouth. Existing Project. A rolled earth-fill dam with maximum height of 245 feet; a crest length of 9,300 feet; and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 23,137,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. It contains seven power units rated at 112,290 kilowatts each. Federal cost of the project was $346,521,000. Construction was initiated in August 1948 and the project was placed in operation in June 1963. Local Cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations During FY. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the FY. Generating facilities produced 3,396,995,000 net kilowatt hours of electricity. 43. MISSOURI RIVER, BETWEEN FT. PECK DAM, MT AND GAVINS POINT DAM, SD, NE Location. The project is located along the Missouri River between Fort Peck Dam, MT, and a point 58 miles downstream of Gavins Point Dam, SD and NE. Existing Project. Consists of undertaking measures, including maintenance and rehabilitation of existing structures, to alleviate bank erosion and related problems associated with releases from the six Missouri River main stem dams that the Secretary determines will be needed. In lieu of structural measures, lands may be acquired in affected areas from willing sellers. The costs of the measures shall be apportioned among project purposes as a joint-use operation and maintenance expense. Estimated Federal cost of the project is between $112 million for construction or $12 million for the land requisition alternative. Cost is limited to no more than $3 million per FY. Local Cooperation. Non-federal funds are not required for this project. One reach, the Missouri National Recreational River downstream from Gavins Point Dam, requires, under its separate authorization, that the landowners make available appropriate land interests to maintain the recreational and scenic qualities of the river and adjacent lands. In the other river reaches, lands can be acquired on a willing-seller basis if land acquisition is the recommended measure for erosion control at a given river site. Operations During FY. Continued coordination for sloughing easements in pursuit of real estate acquisitions in response to requests from landowners. Monitored previously constructed Section 33 projects. Completed con- struction for the Conventional Erosion Control at Buford Trenton Irrigation District, ND. Miscellaneous 44. MISSOURI RIVER MASTER WATER CONTROL MANUAL REVIEW AND UPDATE Location. The area being studied is the Missouri River basin, to include the Missouri River main stem system. States included in the study area include Nebraska, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa, Kansas, and Missouri. Existing Project. During 1987 through 1992, the Missouri River basin experienced a moderate to severe drought, impacting upon the Missouri River main stem projects for the first time since filled in 1967. The drought has had severe impacts on people and industries who use the Missouri River and the main stem reservoirs for navigation, hydropower, water supply, and recreation. Some of the people impacted by the drought have stated 26-15 RiPfRT (W TH IWRFTA RV (1F THEl ARMV AN C'IV!! WRKC ACTVITIFC FAR PV 1002 that the current Master Water Control Manual for the Missouri River main stem system of reservoirs does not adequately take into consideration the contemporary needs of the basin. The purpose of the Missouri River Master Water Control Manual Review and Update study is to determine the water control plan that best meets the needs of the Missouri River basin. Local Cooperation. None required. Operations/Activities During FY. A Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) was released for public review in September 1994. A public comment period was initiated with the release of the DEIS and completed March 1, 1995. During the public comment period, 24 public hearings were held throughout the Missouri and Mississippi River Basins. In order to respond to the numerous comments received on the DEIS, additional or revised technical analyses were necessary in the following areas; interior drainage and groundwater impacts landward of levees, cumulative impacts of bank stabilization, daily flow model, flood control, regional economics, Missouri and Mississippi River navigation, and Missouri River native river fish. During FY 1998, the results of these additional or revised analyses were documented and alternative reevaluation completed. A Preliminary Revised DEIS (PRDEIS), published in August 1998, identified eight alternatives representing the full range of Basin interests. A tribal and public coordination period, which extended until January 30, 1999 followed. A Revised Draft EIS (RDEIS) is scheduled to be published in October 1999. The PRDEIS will present a preferred alternative and will be the subject of full public review and comment, as required by the National Environmental Policy Act. A Final EIS (FEIS) is scheduled for completion in December 2000. Following release of the FEIS, a Washington level review will be conducted and a Record of Decision (ROD) signed. No substantial change in the operation of the main stem reservoir system will be implemented until the ROD is signed and the Master Manual is revised. 45. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM (NEPP) AND SUPPORT FOR FEMA P. L. 93-288 (and Antecedent Legislation) Local Preparedness (510) Continuity of Government Preparedness (520) Emergency Water Preparedness (530) Total NEPP (119,576 $ 119,576 46. FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES (FC&CE) Flood control work under Authorization Emergency Flood Control Activities, Flood Fighting. P. L. 84-99. Disaster Preparedness Emergency Operations Rehabilitation and Inspection Program Advance Measures Hazard Mitigation Reimbursable Activities Total FC&CE $ 349,929 359,975 673,786 4,482,346 9,207 96.883 $ 5,972,126 47. GENERAL REGULATORY FUNCTIONS Permit Evaluation Enforcement Studies Environmental Impact Statement Reimbursable Activities Total Regulatory $ 3,408,296 316,942 10,027 142,434 0 $ 3,877,699 48. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS FY 1998 costs totaled $1,072,799 for all General Investigation activities. See Table 26-K which covers Surveys, Collection and Study of Basic Data, Research and Development, Preconstruction Engineering and Design (projects not fully authorized), Planning and Engineering under Proposed Program Legislation, and Preconstruction Engineering and Design (fully authorized projects). $ 21,458 81,422 26-16 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30, in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 1998 1. Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Mouth (Sioux City, IA to Rulo NE) 2. Missouri River Fish & Wildlife Mitigation, IA, NE, KS, MO 4. Aberdeen & Vicinity, SD Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 5. Bear Creek Lake, CO 6. Bowman-Haley Lake, ND 7. Buford Trenton Irrigation District, ND (Land Acquisition) New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. 1,571,000 1,671,000 1,745,893 1,685,956 3,510,000 4,807,055 110,000 32,957 110,000 32,957 320,000 342,890 160,000 171,298 2,779,000 3,905,783 130,957 200,988 130,957 200,988 394,000 334,567 205,000 201,345 1,802,000 1,803,264 1,584,000 1,208,461 187,000 128,231 187,000 128,231 345,700 352,123 164,000 161,906 2,143,000 2,114,434 1,374,000 1,603,873 54,000 101,637 54,000 101,637 360,000 364,699 155,000 159,626 2,300,000 2,071,907 189,225,991 j/ 189,225,991 1/ 125,548,450 125,500,177 18,213,000 17,959,021 482,067 463,813 482,067 463,813 62,018,608 62,018,608 5,298,309 5,295,946 4,372,174 4,372,174 3,884,270 3,882,165 2,300,000 2,071,907 1/ Includes $18,325,581 National Industrial Recovery Act funds, $8,625,718 Emergency Relief Funds, and $1,181,125 for previous project. 26-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 26-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30, in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 1998 8. Chatfield Lake, CO (Required Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 9. Cherry Creek Lake, CO 10. Fall River Basin, SD (Cottonwood & Coldbrook) 11. Logan Creek Pender, NE Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 12. Milk River, Malta, MT Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. 988,000 1,058,269 984,000 485,003 392,000 434,549 50,100 46,931 44,300 117,644 94,400 164,575 170,800 147,491 170,800 147,491 95,444,010 95,444,010 1,315,328 1,315,328 96,759,338 96,759,338 13,197,230 13,185,052 15,220,364 15,220,364 13,591,474 13,553,340 5,538,432 5,538,432 7,173,625 7,613,835 3,065,013 3,014,948 394,090 193,193 3,459,103 3,208,141 1,483,618 1,463,691 222,720 205,937 1,706,338 1,669,628 929,000 1,019,185 525,000 504,082 424,000 402,063 142,713 144,220 11,654 142,713 155,874 574,500 571,354 85,900 53,502 660,400 624,856 773,000 791,429 771,000 781,224 324,000 344,833 229,200 222,084 229,200 222,084 604,268 555,205 61,700 76,486 665,965 631,691 955,000 954,737 1,237,000 1,212,239 490,000 474,854 2,422,000 2,392,477 264,790 63,895 2,686,790 2,456,372 -39,200 17,495 938 -39,200 18,433 26-18 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30, in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 1998 13. Missouri National Recreational River NE& SD 14. Missouri River Kenslers Bend, NE, to Sioux City, IA 15. Nishnabotna River, Hamburg, IA Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 16. Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lakes, NE Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 17. Pebble Creek Scribner, NE Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. 84,000 106,653 346,000 36,312 1,000 10,621 69,000 59,448 66,675 69,000 126,123 2,507,519 120,000 221,611 120,000 2,729,180 556,000 583,738 273,000 135,041 126,400 81,221 399,400 216,262 38,459 45,887 192,000 406,340 59,000 57,772 83,000 19,117 33,450 23,130 116,450 42,247 325,073 37,614 362,687 571,000 586,413 -65,000 116,079 39,277 -65,000 155,356 105,000 110,890 196,000 174,245 88,000 88,349 151,900 188,774 4,600 17,413 156,500 206,187 18,070 5,857 23,927 615,000 605,775 150,000 117,322 196,000 229,911 59,000 57,132 587,500 281,129 55,890 11,733 643,390 292,862 1,091 1,091 593,000 581,127 3,221 444 3,665 2,249,259 2,208,188 2,629,000 2,520,766 11,294,414 11,294,414 4,983,419 4,980,137 1,052,100 705,211 188,940 142,625 1,241,040 847,836 66,612,215 a/ 66,597,113 2/ 955,000 884,680 67,567,215 67,481,793 9,134,444 9,111,565 2,725,728 2,716,149 435,656 419,880 3,161,384 3,136,029 2/ Does not include $1,854,338 cost of inactive sites. 26-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 26-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30, in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 1998 18. Perry Creek, IA (Required Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 20. Pipestem Lake, ND 21. Salt Creek and Tributaries, NE 23. Thurman to Hamburg, IA Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 24. Van Bibber Creek, CO Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. 4,398,700 388,253 1,354,000 5,524,584 4,398,700 1,354,000 388,253 5,524,584 494,000 535,194 664,000 706,138 40,357 16,088 16,267 16,088 56,624 13,700 3,679 2,200 1,248 15,900 4,927 494,000 491,921 674,000 679,123 449,612 137,471 0 137,741 449,612 213,889 217,319 213,889 217,319 3 Includes $123,000 of government cost applicable to that portion of the project which is currently being carried in a deferred status. 26-20 4,650,000 4,850,900 4,650,000 4,850,900 619,000 617,114 778,000 772,287 360,000 399,998 157,000 294,218 517,000 694,216 355,000 261,285 355,000 261,285 3,424,000 2,516,925 400,000 86,625 3,824,000 2,603,550 561,000 539,598 757,000 750,354 6,000 26,028 26,028 6,000 216,000 252,741 1,030 216,000 253,771 15,296,248 14,300,389 400,000 86,625 15,696,248 14,387,014 9,277,545 9,277,545 7,659,404 7,630,341 12,197,621 L 12,197,621 15,211,276 15,196,340 1,071,000 1,067,044 397,587 371,306 1,468,587 1,438,350 1,023,589 960,000 125,200 125,200 1,148,789 1,085,200 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30, in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 1998 25. Inspections of Completed Local Protection Projects 26. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 29. Boyer Chute, NE Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 30. California Bend, NE Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 31. Deroin Bend, MO Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary Funds 32. Hidden Lake/ Great Marsh, NE Required Contributed Consolidated Summary Maint. Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. 364,000 364,757 365,000 382,945 85,000 64,388 9,377 85,000 73,765 90,000 89,229 90,000 89,229 77,000 70,856 77,000 70,856 188,000 188,151 377,000 375,283 10,000 35,495 2,453 10,000 37,948 165,000 156,120 165,000 156,120 115,000 110,419 115,000 110,419 118,000 1,550,000 98,267 1,550,425 548,000 427,837 118,000 2,098,000 98,267 1,978,262 26-21 253,000 251,864 470,000 473,101 2,898 6 2,904 16,000 24,499 16,000 24,499 140,000 107,215 140,000 107,215 359,000 377,295 102,000 137,075 461,000 514,370 238,000 231,759 334,000 328,652 20,000 9,806 20,000 9,806 137,000 136,570 137,000 136,570 135,000 166,357 135,000 166,357 200 61,843 62,043 5,233,476 5,224,242 9,044,684 9,038,897 1,759,500 1,747,853 82,000 81,993 1,841,500 1,829,846 410,500 408,674 410,500 408,674 469,500 457,340 469,500 457,340 2,206,000 2,205,139 650,000 626,755 2,856,000 2,831,894 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 26-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30, in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 1998 33. Lower Decatur, NE Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary Funds 34. Wehrspann Lake Aquatic Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary Funds 36. Big Bend Dam- Lake Sharpe, Missouri River Basin, SD 37. Fort Peck Lake, MT 38. Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, Missouri River Basin, SD New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. 274 274 2,500 1,311 2,500 1,311 65,000 44,784 65,000 44,784 263,000 166,005 268,000 166,005 110,000 123,269 110,000 123,269 307,000 351,728 307,000 351,728 171,000 158,912 575,000 521,506 575,000 521,506 346,000 326,965 171,000 158,912 346,000 326,965 107,497,597 107,497,597 5,752,000 6,641,604 3,897,000 3,931,300 7,354,000 8,218,957 5,527,000 5,504,991 4,481,000 3,859,970 9,122,000 8,951,889 5,692,300 5,595,713 3,459,000 3,469,804 8,943,500 9,149,872 7,121,000 109,600,573 4/ 6,623,326 108,957,540 4 4,141,000 4,891,338 158,428,080 158,428,080 96,278,834 / 96,109,113 4 199,065,883 199,065,883 9,118,000 171,227,134 / 8,887,964 170,912,953 4/ 41 Includes Special Recreation Use Fees. 26-22 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30, in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 1998 Garrison Dam Lake Sakakawea, Missouri River Basin, ND Federal Funds Required Contributed Funds 41. Gavins Point Dam-Lewis & Clark Lake, Missouri River Basin, NE and SD 42. Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, Missouri River Basin, SD & ND 43. Missouri River Between Ft. Peck Dam MT & Gavins Point Dam, SD and NE 44. Missouri River Master Water Control Manual Review and Update 40. 295,729,613 295,729,613 9,115,000 9,606,252 New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint Approp. Cost. Major Rehab: Approp. Cost. Major Rehab: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. 9,010,000 9,587,527 2,079,000 484,314 8,141,000 8,111,952 6,244,000 6,170,067 8,723,000 8,737,237 366,000 1,568,739 Maint: Approp. 3,219,000 3,094,000 Cost. 3,242,717 3,351,586 8,491,000 8,113,054 374,000 356,271 5,933,500 5,931,717 9,148,000 9,246,349 735,000 242,223 2,549,000 2,566,603 7,540,000 184,279,673 4/ 7,942,739 184,160,1934/ 1,035,000 555,288 5,617,310 5,119,869 686,961 686,961 49,617,239 49,617,239 6,227,000 124,891,4124/ 5,965,884 124,503,845 4/ 346,520,603 346,520,603 11,669,200 187,950,700 4/ 10,292,662 186,511,107 4/ 737,000 1,528,412 1,800,000 1,810,941 4,472,000 4,210,962 21,447,000 21,447,000 4/ Includes Special Recreation Use Fees. 26-23 8,560,000 9,124,583 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 26-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA TO MOUTH (SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE) Appropriation of $12 million authorized for securing a 6 foot depth from Quindaro Bend (Kansas City, MO to Sioux City, IA). Appropriation of $15 million additional allotments totaling $29,153,108 made by Public Works Administration under provisions of National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933, and $9,669,791 allotted under provisions of Emergency Relief Appropriations Act of 1935. For completion of project from mouth to Sioux City, IA. For a channel of 9-foot depth and 300-foot width. H. Doc. 1120, 60th Cong. PL 71-520 PL 73-67 H. Doc 238, 73rd Cong. PL 74-409 H. Doc. 214, 76th Cong. PL 79-14 Water Resources Development Act Of 1986 Flood Control Act of 1948 Aug 13, 1968 Flood Control Act of 1962 Section 336(a) Water Resources Development Act of 1996 Flood control Act of 1950 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 MISSOURI RIVER FISH & WILDLIFE MITIGATION, IA, NE, KS, MO Mitigate fish and wildlife losses resulting from the construction and operation of the Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation project. ABERDEEN & VICINITY, SD Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 as amended; flood damage reduction BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO A flood control reservoir for protection of metropolitan Denver, CO. BOWMAN-HALEY LAKE, ND Flood Control reservoir and water supply. BUFORD TRENTON IRRIGATION DISTRICT, ND (LAND AQUISTION) CHATFIELD LAKE, CO Flood control reservoir and channel improvements to provide downstream protection for Denver, CO. Modified 1950 Flood Control Act to operate dam and other Federal improvements to achieve authorized level of protection, beginning at dam and ending 82 miles downstream. Reassigns a portion of the storage space in the lake project to joint flood control-conservation purposes. Modified 1974 WRDA to exempt prohibition of encroachment for Mineral Ave/ Ken Caryl Rd. ext & transmission line. Section 601, PL 99-662 S. Doc. 87, 90th Cong. PL 90-483 H. Doc. 574, 87th Cong. PL 87-874 P.L. 104-303 H. Doc. 669, 80th Cong. PL 81-516 H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong. PL 99-662 26-24 1. Jan 12, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Mar 2, 1945 2. 5. 8. OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Dec 22, 1944 Aug 18, 1941 Flood Control Act of 1948 Flood Control Act of 1948 National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 Aug 18, 1941 June 30, 1948 Flood Control Act of 1948 Flood Control Act of 1968 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 June 30, 1948 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO Initiation and partial accomplishment of project. Completion of plan approved in Act of Aug 18, 1941. General comprehensive plan, Missouri River Basin. FALL RIVER BASIN, SD Provide flood control to the town of Hot Springs, SD. LOGAN CREEK, PENDER, NE Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 as amended; flood damage reduction MILK RIVER, MALTA, MT Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 as amended; flood damage reduction MISSOURI NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER, NE AND SD Preservation and enhancement of the Missouri River between the reaches from Gavins Point Dam, NE & SD to Ponca State Park, NE. MISSOURI RIVER, KENSLERS BEND, NE , TO SIOUX CITY, IA Construction of dike, revetments. H. Doc. 426, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 H. Doc. 426, 76th Cong. PL 78-534 H. Doc. 475, and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 H. Doc. 655, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 PL 95-625 H. Doc. 821, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 PL 80-858 NISHNABOTNA RIVER, HAMBURG, IA Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 as amended; flood damage reduction PAPILLION CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES LAKES, NE Series of flood control reservoirs, providing protection for the metropolitan areas of Omaha, NE. Authorized additional $4.8 million for channel improvement on Big Papillon Creek, and to Union Pacific RR bridge, rec trail and flood warning system. PEBBLE CREEK, SCRIBNER, NE Levee and channel improvement for local protection - Section 205. PERRY CREEK, IA Provide flood protection for Perry Creek, Iowa. H. Doc. 349, 90th Cong. PL 90-485 H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong. PL 99-662 858, 80th Cong. Section 401, PL 99-662 26-25 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 26-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents June 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sep 3, 1954 Sep 3, 1954 May 2, 1956 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Dec 30, 1963 June 18, 1965 Aug 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 Dec 24, 1970 Dec 31, 1970 Dec 23, 1971 Mar 7, 1974 July 8, 1976 Nov 16, 1977 Flood Control Act of 27 Oct 1965 19. PIPESTEM LAKE, ND Provide flood control for Jamestown, ND and downstream areas. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (OMAHA DIST.) Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE and authorized additional $7 million. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized additional $200 million. Authorized additional $150 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $250 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized additional $217,710,000. Authorized $5,384,014 to compensate Sioux Indians for reservation lands required for Oahe, South Dakota project. Modified general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin by deletion of construction of Red Willow Dam and Reservoir, NE, and addition of construction of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, KS. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized additional $200 million. Authorized additional $207 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $80 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and modified the plan to include work protection and rectification works below Garrison Dam. Authorized additional $116 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $38 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $109 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Changed comprehensive plan name to Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Oahe Dam and Reservoir, ND. Authorized additional $101 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $72 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $85 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $59 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. 26-26 Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong. PL 75-761 H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 H. Doc. 475, and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 PL 79-526 PL 81-516 H. Docs. 549 and 642, 81st Cong. PL 83-780 PL 83-776 PL 84-505 H. Doc. 409, 84th Cong. P. L. 85-500 P. L 86-645 P. L. 88-253 P. L. 89-042 P. L. 90-483 H. Doc. 91-748 and S. Doc. 91-895 P.L. 91-282 S. Doc. 91-1100, 91st Cong. P.L. 91-576 H. Doc. 91-23 and P. L. 91-611 P. L. 92-222 P. L. 93-251 P. L. 94-347 P. L. 95-189 H. Doc. 266, 89th Cong. P. L. 89-298 20. OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents July 3, 1958 May 17, 1950 May 12, 1967 Aug 13, 1968 Jun 19, 1970 Dec 23, 1971 Mar 7, 1974 Jul 8, 1976 Nov 16, 1977 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 Flood Control Act of 1948 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Dec. 22, 1944 21. 22. H. Doc. 396, 84th Cong. P. L. 85-500 H. Doc. 669, 80th Cong. P. L. 81-516 P. L. 90-17 P. L. 90-843 P. L. 91-282 P. L . 92-222 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 94-347 P.L. 95-189 Section 1152 P. L.. 99-662 SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE Series of dams and channel improvements for flood control around Lincoln, NE. SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, CO Adopted plan of improvement for South Platte River Basin and authorized $26.3 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Authorized additional $2 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $12 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $21 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $37 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $15 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $22 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $3 million for prosecution of plan. THURMAN TO HAMBURG, IA Install pumping facilities to prevent flooding in the Thurman to Hamburg area of the Missouri River in western Fremont County, IA. VAN BIBBER CREEK, CO Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 as amended; flood damage reduction BOYER CHUTE, NE Section 1135 (b) of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986, as amended; environmental improvement CALIFORNIA BEND, NE Section 1135 (b) of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986, as amended; environmental improvement DEROIN BEND, MO Section 1135 (b) of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986, as amended; environmental improvement HIDDEN LAKE/GREAT MARSH Section 1135 (b) of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986, as amended; environmental improvement LOWER DECATUR, NE Section 1135(b) of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986 as amended; environmental improvement WEHRSPANN LAKE AQUATIC, NE Section 1135(b) of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986 as amended; environmental improvement BIG BEND DAM - LAKE SHARPE, SD Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. H. Doc. 475 and S. Doc. 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 26-27 P.L. 99-662 P. L. 99-662 P. L. 99-662 P. L. 99-662 P. L. 99-662 P. L. 99-662 23. 24. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 36. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 26-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents 37. June 16, 1933 Aug 30, 1935 May 18, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 38. 40. Dec. 22, 1944 PWA 1968 Dec. 22, 1944 41. 42. Dec. 22, 1944 43. Water Resources Development Act of 1988 44. Dec 22, 1944 FORT PECK LAKE, MT Construction of earth dam, as recommended by Chief of Engineers Sep 30, 1933, was approved by Executive Order by the President and included in Public Works Administration program, Oct 14, 1933 as authorized by the National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933 and adopted by the River and Harbor Act of 1935 (PL 74-409). Completion, maintenance, and operation of a hydroelectric power plant, subject to certain provisions in act respecting transmission and sale of electric energy. Also authorizes installation of additional power-generating facilities by Secretary of War when deemed necessary in judgment of Bureau of Reclamation. FORT RANDALL DAM - LAKE FRANCIS CASE, SD Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. GARRISON DAM - LAKE SAKAKAWEA, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, ND Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. GAVINS POINT DAM - LEWIS AND CLARK LAKE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, NE AND SD Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. OAHE DAM - LAKE OAHE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD & ND Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. MISSOURI RIVER BETWEEN FT. PECK DAM ,MT & GAVINS POINT DAM, SD & NE Undertake measures to alleviate bank erosion and related problems associated with releases along the Missouri River from the six main stem dams. MISSOURI RIVER MASTER WATER CONTROL MANUAL REVIEW AND UPDATE Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. H. Doc. 238, 73rd Cong. P .L. 74-409 P. L. 75-529 H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. P .L. 78-534 H. Doc. 475 and S. Doc. 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 H. Doc. 475 and S. Doc. 247, 78th Cong. P. L. 78-534 H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. Section 33, PL 100-676 H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. P. L. 78-534 26-28 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost Cost to September 30, 1998 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Fort Benton, MT Complete 1948 3,123,141 644,863 Small Navigation Project at Sioux City, IA Complete 1970 43,582 88,716 26-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 26-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost Cost to September 30, 1998 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Belle Fourche, Cheyenne River, SD 1/ Complete 1940 37,410 Big Sioux River at Sioux City, IA Complete 1982 7,458,934 Blackbird Creek Near Macy, NE 2/ Complete 1970 262,479 Buffalo Creek, Meadow Grove, NE 2/ Complete 1974 293,016 Buffalo Creek, Scranton, ND 2/ Complete 1960 102,980 Cedar Canyon Dam, Rapid City, SD Complete 1960 120,482 City of Aurora, Westerly Creek, CO Complete 1955 150,000 Clarkson, NE, Maple Creek Complete 1967 191,282 Council Bluffs, IA (Act of 1936) Complete 1939 - Council Bluffs, IA (Act of 1944) Complete 1954 2,557,680 Deadman's Gulch, Sturgis, SD 2/ Complete 1981 3,000,000 Dry Creek, Hawarden, IA Complete 1964 400,000 East Nishnabotna River at Red Oak, IA 2/ Complete 1986 2,154,016 Floyd River, Sioux City, IA Complete 1970 11,556,667 Forsyth, MT Complete 1950 255,177 Frazer-Wolf Point, MT Complete 1982 435,000 Gering Valley, NE Complete 1971 5,989,663 Glasgow, MT Complete 1939 16,832 Great Falls, MT Complete 1991 11,905,000 Greybull, WY Complete 1960 248,507 Havre, MT Complete 1958 1,825,881 Herreid, Spring Creek, SD Complete 1954 50,216 Hooper, NE 2/ Complete 1968 326,667 Ida Grove, IA 2/ Complete 1972 522,344 Indian Creek at Emerson, IA 2/ Complete 1986 333,000 Jamestown Reservoir, ND Complete 1950 Linton, ND 2/ Inactive 1973 Little Papillion Creek, NE Complete 1976 3,643,111 Little Sioux River, IA Complete 1992 20,630,000 Loup River, Columbus, NE 2/ Complete 1973 1,000,000 Lower Heart River, ND Complete 1964 1,961,173 Lower Heart River, Mandan, ND 2/ Complete 1991 1,153,430 Madison, NE, Union and Taylor Creeks 2/ Complete 1967 234,839 Mandan, Heart River, ND Complete 1960 676,916 Marmarth, ND Complete 1960 169,498 McCook Lake, SD Complete 1958 147,627 Miles City, MT Inactive 1956 Missouri River, Aten, NE Complete 1951 578,791 1/ Completed as a Public Works Administration project. 2/ Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 26-30 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1998 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS and MO Complete 1993 37,964,177 Missouri River, Niobrara, NE Complete 1945 99,370 Mott, ND Deferred - - - Mud Creek, Broken Bow, NE 2/ Complete 1976 1,000,000 Nishnabotna River at Hamburg, IA Complete 1948 236,000 Norfolk, NE Complete 1971 3,400,504 Omaha, NE Complete 1954 5,903,640 Pierce, NE Complete 1967 296,597 Platte River Near Schuyler, NE 2/ Complete 1948 74,940 Platte River and Lost Creek, Schuyler, NE Complete 1971 257,398 Platte River and Tributaries, NE Inactive - 1,538,269 - Rapid Creek, Rapid City, SD Complete 1980 1,004,000 Saco, MT Complete 1958 67,793 Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton, SD Complete 1978 184,380 Sheridan, WY 3/ Complete 1976 2,618,809 Shields River, Near Clyde Park, MT 2/ Complete 1951 25,747 Sioux Falls, SD Complete 1966 5,288,707 Vaughn, MT, Sun River 2/ Complete 1971 457,582 Waterloo, NE Complete 1970 237,883 West Point, NE Complete 1966 149,596 - Yellowstone River, W. Glendive, MT Complete 1960 230,294 a/ Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 3/ Includes inactive segment. 26-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 26-F OTHER MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to September 30, 1998 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Gavins Point Dam - Lewis and Clark Lake, Relocation of Niobrara, NE Complete 1980 13,516,459 - Williston, ND Water Intake Complete 1981 988,583 - 26-32 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Deauthorization Funds Funds Project Report For Document Expended Expended Billings, MT (Western Unit) Boulder, CO Buffalo, Johnson County Diversion Channel, WY Castlewood Lake, Douglas County, CO Davids Creek Lake, IA Dayton, WY Giles Creek, Elkhorn, NE Indian Creek Lake, IA Lake Herman (Dredging), SD Little Nemaha River, Nemaha County, NE Milk River, Havre, MT Miles City, MT Morrison, Bear Creek, CO Oahe Dam - Lake Oahe (Wildlife Restoration), ND Redwater River and Hay Creek, Bell Fourche, SD 1976 1976 1961 1943 1972 1956 1952 1969 N/A 1973 N/A 1982 1950 N/A 1966 Sec. 201, FC Act 1950 23 Mar 81 FC Act 1950 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 FC Act 1950 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 PL 77-228 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Sec. 203, PL 90-483 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 5 Aug 77 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 6 Nov 77 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 4 Jan 74 Sec. 1001(a), PL 89-298 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Sec. 204, PL 89-298 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Sec. 1001(a), PL 89-298 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 FC Act of 1950 Section 1001(b) WRDA 1986 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 5 Aug 77 FC Act of 1970 Section 1001(b) WRDA 1986 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 4 Jan 74 26-33 75,000 142,666 135,000 282,200 30,000 0 1,000 The following investigations for flood control called for by Flood Control Acts and committee resolutions were deauthorized by WRDA of 1986, 17 Oct 86; Aowa & South Creek, NE; Bow Creek, NE; Cannonball River, ND; James River, ND & SD;,Judith River Basin, MT; Niobrara River Basin, NE, SD & WY; Omaha Creek, NE; South Dakota Lakes, SD; Weeping Water Creek, NE; Windpower at Ft. Peck Lake, MT; Yellowstone River below Billings, MT; South Platte River, Denver-Ft. Lupton-Ft. Morgan, CO; Lower Big Sioux River IA & SD; Eagle Bay Highway Bridge, Missouri River Basin, ND; Sheridan, WY (Stage III); Missouri River Levee System Units: R531, R540, R553, R555, R577, R589, R603, R610, R623, R644, R645, R652, R661, R669, R676, R682, R686, R703, R717, R719, R725, R728, R742, R750. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 26-G (continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Deauthorization Funds Funds Project Report For Document Expended Expended Shell Creek, NE 1962 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 71,000 - WRDA of 1974 3 Oct 78 Upper Missouri River, SD N/A Sec. 1001(a), PL 89-298 - - Streambank Erosion Control Project WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Vermillion River and Tribs, SD 1968 Sec. 12 PL 93-251 208,000 - WRDA of 1974 4 Jan 74 The following investigations for flood control called for by Flood Control Acts and committee resolutions were deauthorized by WRDA of 1986, 17 Oct 86; Aowa & South Creek, NE; Bow Creek, NE; Cannonball River, ND; James River, ND & SD;,Judith River Basin, MT; Niobrara River Basin, NE, SD & WY; Omaha Croeek, NE; South Dakota Lakes, SD; Weeping Water Creek, NE; Windpower at Ft. Peck Lake, MT; Yellowstone River below Billings, MT; South Platte River, Denver-Ft. Lupton-Ft. Morgan, CO; Lower Big Sioux River IA & SD; Eagle Bay Highway Bridge, Missouri River Basin, ND; Sheridan, WY (Stage III); Missouri River Levee System Units: R531, RS540, R553, R555, RS577, R589, R603, R610, R623, R644, R645, R652, R661, R669, R676, R682, R686, R703, R717, R719, R725, R728, R742, R750. 26-34 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE TABLE 26-H Miles of Unit Levee Status L627-624 L601 L594 R580 L575 R573 RS562 L561-550 R548 L536 R520 R613 R616 L611-614 L627, L624, L561-550 Comprehensive Mosquito Creek Levee Watkins-Waubonsie Ditch Levees Pleasant Valley Levee Nebraska City Levee Thurman-Hamburg Levee Otto County Drainage District No. 2 Peru Dike Atchison County Levee District No. 1 Brownville-Nemaha Levee Mill Creek Levee Richardson County Drainage District No. 8 Papillion Creek-Platte River Levee Bellevue-Papillion Creek Levees Mosquito-Keg Creek Levees Remedial Studies on Completed Units Restudy of Levee System 14.2 15.0 11.4 0.2 45.8 5.9 7.6 41.3 19.5 13.6 6.3 14.0 4.5 22.0 Complete 1950 Complete 1966 Complete 1964 Complete 1950 Complete 1950 Complete 1950 Complete 1950 Complete 1952 Complete 1952 Complete 1952 Complete 1960 Complete 1971 Complete 1987 Complete 1988 Studies Complete Studies Complete 26-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM TABLE 26-I (See Section 18 of Text) Estimated Estimated Project Federal Cost Non-Federal Cost Fort Peck Lake, MT 1/, 158,428,000 1,103,000 Garrison Dam, Lake Sakakawea, ND 1/, / 299,938,000 1,516,000 Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS and MO (Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE) 1/, I 37,931,000 4,618,000 Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, SD and ND 1/, 2/ 346,521,000 2,320,000 Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, SD 1, 107,498,000 302,000 Fort Randall Dam, Lake Francis Case, SD 1, 1 199,066,000 1,609,000 Gavins Point Dam, Lewis & Clark Lake, SD & NE 1/, / 49,617,000 137,000 Gavins Point Dam, Lewis & Clark Lake, SD & NE-Relocation of Niobrara, NE 1/ 13,516,000 - Omaha, NE 2/ 5,904,000 362,000 Council Bluffs, IA / 2,558,000 146,000 Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe, ND l/ 9,413,000 270,000 Cherry Creek Lake, CO 1, / 15,220,000 285,000 1/ Details presented on individual report. a/ Completed. /I Active portion of project. 26-36 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT INSPFCTON OF1 COMPIETD IOCAL, PROTECTION PRO WCTS TABLE 26-J (See Section 24 of Text) Location Month Inspected Montana Beaver Creek, Saco Sep 98 * Clyde Park, Shields River Aug 92 Glasgow, Milk River Sep 97 Havre, Milk River Sep 98 Havre, Scott Coulee-Bull Hook Dam Sep 98 Three Forks, Lower Madison River Sep 92 Forsythe, Yellowstone River Sep 97 West Glendive, Yellowstone River Sep 97 Sun River,Vaughn Sep 98 * Yellowstone River, Water Plant, Livingston Oct 96 Sun River, Great Falls Sep 98 * Milk River, Malta (Sewer Line) May 96 * Yellowstone River, Livingston (N.E. Livingston Bridge) Sep 97 * Milk River, Chinook (Finley Bridge) Oct 96 * Battle Creek, Chinook (Uhruh Bridge) May 96 * East Gallatin, Near Bozeman (Intst Bridge) May 96 * Yellowstone River, Near Livingston (Hwy 89- 7 Miles East of Livingston) Sep 97 * Shields River, Near Livingston (Hwy 89) Sep 97 * Teton River, Near Choteau (Hwy 89) Sep 98 * Madison River, Quake Lake May 96 * Milk River, Malta May 94 Missouri River, Bank Stabilization Project, Frazer Sep 94 * Dearborn River - Hwy 287, Wolf Creek Sep 98 * Muddy Creek - Int Hwy 15 - Frontage Road, Vaughn Sep 98 * Badger Creek - Hwy 89, Browning Sep 98 Wyoming * Baldwin Creek, Lander (Sewage Lagoons) Sep 96 Greybull, Big Horn River Sep 97 Sheridan, Big and Little Goose Creeks Sep 97 * Shoshone River, Bank Protection, Lovell Aug 92 * Shoshone River, Byron Aug 92 * Powder River, Arvada Oct 96 * Medicine Bow River, Elk Mountain Jan 97 North Dakota Mandan, Lower Heart River Oct 96 Marmarth, Little Missouri River May 98 Scranton, Buffalo May 98 * Cannonball River Oct 97 * Denotes Section 14 Projects ** Denotes PL-84-99 Projects 26-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 INSPCTIlN(il COIMPI,iTET 1~,0CAl. PRTECTI'TTON PRfI.Jl CTS TABLE 26-J (Continued) (See Section 24 of Text) Location Month Inspected South Dakota Big Sioux River, Union County Aug 98 Big Sioux River, North Sioux City Aug 98 Sioux Falls, Big Sioux River Aug 98 Belle Fourche, Belle Fourche River May 95 Rapid City, Cedar Canyon Dam Sep 98 Hot Springs, Fall River Channel Sep 98 Herreid, Spring Creek Sep 95 * Missouri River, Bank Protection, Greenwood Sep 93 * Bad River, Bank Protection, Fort Pierre * Big Sioux River, Schofield Bridge, Near Flandreau Aug 98 * Rapid Creek, Rapid City Sep 98 * Missouri River, Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton Aug 97 * Vermillion River, Vermillion Aug 98 * Big Sioux River, Harrisburgh Aug 98 * Big Sioux River, Jefferson Aug 98 Deadman Gulch, Sturgis Aug 98 * Marne Creek, Yankton Aug 98 * White River, Winner Oct 96 * James River, Yankton Aug 98 * Missouri River, White Swan & Sunshine Bottoms Aug 98 * Big Sioux River, Plymouth County Aug 98 Colorado Aurora, Westerly Creek-Kelley Road Dam May 98 * South Platte River, Kersey Sep 96 * South Platte River, Merino Sep 96 * South Platte River, Iliff Sep 96 * South Platte River, Platteville Sep 96 * Big Thompson River, Johnstown Aug 95 * Cache La Poudre River, Ft. Collins (Water Treatment Plant) Sep 94 * South Platte River, Fort Lupton Hwy 85 Sep 96 * South Platte River, Logan County (Bridges 175A & 173) Sep 96 * Downstream Chatfield, Denver Oct 97 Nebraska * Blackbird Creek, Burt County May 97 Omaha, Missouri River Sep 97 Waterloo, Elkhorn River May 98 West Point, Elkhorn River May 98 Pierce, Elkhorn River May 98 Clarkson, Middle Fork, Maple Creek May 97 Hooper, Elkhorn River Jul 98 Norfolk, North Fork, Elkhorn River May 98 Madison, Union & Taylor Creeks Sep 96 Schuyler, Lost Creek & Platte River Aug 97 Little Papillion, Little Papillion Creek Aug 96 * Denotes Section 14 Projects ** Denotes PL-84-99 Projects 26-38 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TINPECTTfN OF CAMPL ET1ID TOAC AT. PRAOTWECTION PROIJECT TABLE 264 (Continued) (See Section 24 of Text) Location Month Inspected Nebraska (continued) Macy, Blackbird Creek Apr 98 Lincoln, Salt Creek & Tributaries Jun 98 Meadow Grove, Buffalo Creek May 98 Columbus, Loup River Aug 98 Broken Bow, Mud Creek Aug 98 * Platte River, Brady Feb 95 * Elm Creek, Decatur Apr 95 * Nebraska City South Table Creek Aug 95 * Wigle Creek, Homer Jul 95 * South Elkhorn River, near Ewing, NE Apr 95 * Elk Creek, Jackson Jul 95 * Elk Creek, Willis Jul 95 Flood Control Project, Lost Creek, Columbus Aug 98 * Middle Pebble Creek, Snyder Jun 95 * Elm Creek, Burt County Apr 95 * Platte River, Camp Ashland Sep 95 * West Branch Papillion Creek, Omaha, NE May 95 * Logan Creek, Near Bancroft Jul 95 * Platte River, Near North Bend Aug 96 * Elkhorn River, Near Beemer Jul 95 * East Bow Creek, Wynot Aug 98 * Cedar River, Spalding Nov 95 ** Ames Diking District near Ames Jul 96 ** North Bend Diking District Jul 96 ** Cottrelle Diking District Jul 96 ** Fremont County Bd of Sup Winslow Levee Jul 96 ** Fremont County Bd of Sup Bowman, Zach, Roth Jul 96 ** Fremont County Bd of Sup Peterson Jul 96 ** Clear Creek Diking District Aug 96 ** SID #1 Lake Waconda Jul 96 ** SID #97 Hawaiian Village Jul 96 ** SID #101 Hansen Lake Jun 96 ** PMRNRD Western Feb 95 ** PMRNRD Cape-L Str May 94 ** LPSNRD Omaha Fish Jan 94 ** PMRNRD Union Dike Jun 93 ** PMRNRD No Name Nov 93 ** Corning Levee Dist #2 Mill Creek D.D. Jul 94 ** Fremont Co. Bd. of Sup. Whitehead Levee Oct 94 * Lodgepole Creek, Sydney Oct 97 Gering Drain, Gering Sep 97 * Denotes Section 14 Projects ** Denotes PL-84-99 Projects 26-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TINPFCTTON niF COMPlTEn l T A. s A PROT'.ET TITON PRO FCTS TABLE 26-J (Continued) (See Section 24 of Text) Location Month Inspected Iowa Council Bluffs, Missouri River Oct 96 Ida Grove, Maple River-Odebolt Creek Aug 98 Sioux City, Floyd River Aug 98 Hawarden, Dry Creek Aug 98 Hamburg L575, Nishnabotna River May 98 Intercounty D.D., Little Sioux River Sep 98 Nagel D.D., Little Sioux River Sep 98 Bennett-McDonald-Smithland D.D., Little Sioux River Jul 96 * West Nishnabotna River, Mills County Bridge, Near Malvern Jun 95 * East Nisbnabotna River, Page County Bridge, Near Essex May 94 East Nishnabotna River, Red Oak Aug 98 * Mucky Creek, Mapleton, IA Sep 95 Emerson, Indian Creek, Mills County Aug 98 Monona-Harrison Ditch Control, Monona County Sep 95 * Little Sioux River, Anthon Jul 95 * Keg Creek, Minden Feb 92 * Soldier River, Near Ute Sep 95 Missouri River Levees L624 & L627, Mosquito Creek & Sieck Levees Oct 96 L601, Watkins Levee District Aug 98 L601, Miller-Sturgeon Levee District Aug 98 L601, Missouri River Levee District #1 Aug 98 L594, Waubansie Drainage District Aug 98 L594, Pleasant Valley Levee District Aug 98 L575, Benton-Washington Levee District May 98 L575, Northwest Atchison Levee District May 98 L575, McKissock Island Levee District May 98 L575, Bucbannan Levee District May 98 L561, L550, L536, Atchison County Levee District Sep 97 L611-614, M & P Missouri River Levee District Sep 98 R613, Papio Natural Resources District Aug 96 R548, Little Nemaha Levee District May 98 R520, Richardson Co. Levee Dist. #8 May 98 R573, Otoe County Drainage Dist. #2 Jun 98 R616, Sarpy County Papio Natural Resources District Aug 96 R562, Peru Levee District Sep 98 R548, Brownville-Nemaha Levee District May 98 * Denotes Section 14 Projects ** Denotes PL-84-99 Projects 26-40 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS TABLE 26-K (See Section 46 of Text) Federal Cost Totals By Item Fiscal Year 98 Subtotal and Category SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Control Studies (120) Antelope Creek, Lincoln, NE 68,026 Lower Platte River and Tribs., NE 244,771 Subtotal 312,797 Special Studies (140) None in FY 98 Review of Authorized Projects (160) Review of Completed Projects: Recon. Study (163) 79,102 Subtotal 79,102 Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations (171) 127,446 FERC Licensing Activities (172) 4,928 Interagency Water Resources Development(173) 21,900 North American Waterfowl Management Plan(176) 2,978 Subtotal 157,252 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Cooperation With Other Water Resources Agencies (181) 10,923 Cooperation with States (186) 189,937 Subtotal 200,860 TOTAL (Category 100) 750,011 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) 7,490 Flood Plain Management, Omaha, NE 45,561 National Flood Proofing Cmet (NFPC) 4,448 Quick Responses (250) 6,067 SS -Hay Creek, Bismarck, ND 8,503 SS -Big Sioux River, Esteline, SD 9,582 SS - N. Fork, Elkhorn River, CO 20,167 SS - Cache LaPoudre Riv., Greeley, CO 4,015 SS - Montgomery County, IA 6,815 SS - Butler County, NE 10,021 SS - Polk, NE 8,739 SS - Johnson County, KS 30 SS - South Platte River, CO 12,845 SS- North Sioux City, SD 29,998 SS- Sterling, CO 11,976 SS - Parkston, SD 6,618 SS - Roundup, MT 6,834 SS- Blackbird, Macy, NE 5,869 SS - Little Sioux River, Anthon, IA 8,107 Technical Services, General (250) 49,013 Hydrologic Studies (260) General Hydrologic Studies (262) 23,770 TOTAL (Category 200) 286,468 26-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS TABLE 26-K (Continued) (See Section 46 of Text) Federal Cost Totals By Item Fiscal Year 98 Subtotal and Categories PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN - PROJECTS NOT FULLY AUTHORIZED (Category 400) Wood River, Grand Island, NE (451) Big Sioux River, Sioux Falls, SD (451) Watertown and Vicinity, SD (451) TOTAL (Category 400) GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 4,164 32,156 36,320 1,072,799 26-42 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION TABLE 26-L (See Section 24 of Text) Fiscal Year 98 Project Name Stage Cost Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Disaster Preparedness (100) - 349,929 Emergency Operations (200) - 359,975 Rehabilitation & Inspection Program (300) - 673,786 Emergency Water Supplies & Drought Assistance (400) - 0 Advance Measures (500) - 4,482,346 Hazard Mitigation (600) - 9,207 Total (FCCE) 5,875,243 Section 205: Logan Creek, Pender, NE P/C 2,392,477 Aberdeen & Vicinity, SD P 101,637 Maple Creek East Fork, Howells, NE C 948 Milk River, Malta, MT C 17,495 Nishnabotna River, Hamburg, IA P/C 281,129 Pebble Creek, Scribner, NE C 0 Salt Creek, Levees, Lincoln, NE F 577 Van Bibber Creek, Arvada, CO P 252,741 Box Elder Creek, SD F 18,076 James River, Jamestown, ND F 58,956 Iowa & South Creeks, Ponca, NE F 32,998 Total (Section 205's) 3,157,034 Section 14: MO River, Richland County Road 152, MT C 138,625 White River, Jones County, SD PDA 8,161 Little Missouri River, E. River Rd., Medora, ND PDA 25,223 James River Rd. (CR 213), SD PDA 18,892 Total (Section 14's) 190,901 Total Flood Control Activities $9,223,178 L = Litigation R = Recon P = Plans & Specs C = Construction F = Feasibility - = Does Not Apply PDA = Planning & Design Analysis (Section 14 only) 26-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 26-M PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT Modification of projects for the purpose of improving the quality of the environment in the public interest. (Section 1135, Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress, as amended.) Fiscal Year 98 Fiscal Year 98 Study/Project and Location Federal Funds Expended Contributed Funds Expended California Bend, NE 136,570 - Hidden Lake Restoration, NE 200 61,843 Lower Decatur Bend, NE 351,728 Boyer Chute, NE 9,806 Missouri River Levee Unit L536 Deroin Bend, MO 166,357 Wehrspann, Lake Aquatic, NE 158,912 Coordination Account Funds 8,617 Initial Appraisals, General, NE 24,314 26-44 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT * The district comprises a portion of southwestern Iowa; northwestern, central and western Missouri; northern Kansas; southern Nebraska; and a portion of northeastern Colorado embraced in drainage basin of the Missouri River and tributaries from Rulo, Nebraska, to the mouth. Report on navigation project for section of Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, to Rulo, Nebraska, is in report of Omaha District. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page Work Under Special Authorities 1. Missouri River, Sioux City,IA to Mouth (Rulo, NE, to Mouth) 2. Missouri River Fish and Wildlife Mitigation,IA,NE,KS, and MO Flood Control 3. Blue River Basin, Kansas City, MO 4. Blue River Channel, Kansas City, MO 5. Brush Creek, Kansas City, MO 6. Clinton Lake, Wakarusa River, KS 7. Harlan County Lake, Republican River, NE 8. Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, KS 9. Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS 10. Little Blue River Lakes, MO 11. Long Branch Lake, Little Chariton River, MO 12. Melvern Lake, Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River, KS 13. Milford Lake, Republican River, KS 14. Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS, and MO (Rulo, NE, to Mouth) 15. Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS 16. Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (Kansas City District) 17. Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, MO 18. Pomona Lake, One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, KS 19. Rathbun Lake, Chariton River, IA 20. Smithville lake, Little Platte River, MO 21. Tuttle Creek Lake, Big Blue River, KS 22. Wilson Lake, Saline River, KS 23. Scheduling of Flood Control Reservoir Operations 24. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 25. Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO 26. Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO v 27-8 27-8 27-2 27-2 27-2 27-3 27-3 27-3 27-3 27-4 27-4 27-4 27-5 27-5 27-5 27-6 27-6 27-6 27-6 27-7 27-7 27-7 27-7 27-8 27-8 2277--88 27- 1 27-9 27-9 27-10 27. Continuing Authorities Program Project Modifications for Improvement Of Environment 28. Emergency Response Activities General Investigations 29. General Investigations Other Activities 30. Mississippi River Main Stem Model Development 31. National Emergency Preparedness 32. Missouri River Basin Collaborative Effort 33. Regulatory Program Tables Table 27-A Cost & Financial Statement Table 27-B Authorizing Legislation Table 27-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects Table 27-D Not Applicable Table 27-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects Table 27-F Not Applicable Table 27-G Deauthorized Projects Table 27-H Missouri River Levee System Table 27-I Kansas City District Projects Included in Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program Table 27-J Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects Table 27-K Work Under Special Authorities Continuing Authorities Program Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment Emergency Response Activities Table 27-L Active General Investigations Table 27-M Regulatory Program 27-10 27-10 27-10 27-10 27-11 27-15 27-20 27-21 27-23 27-27 27-28 27-29 27-30 27-31 27-31 27-33 27-35 RFPORT OF THE S CRFTARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL. WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 199R Navigation 1. MISSOURI RIVER,SIOUX CITY, IA,TO MOUTH (RULO,NE,TO MOUTH) Location. Jefferson, Madison, and Gallatin Rivers conjoin at Three Forks, Montana, to form the Missouri River, which flows southeasterly 2,315 miles (1960 mileage) across or along seven states to the Mississippi River, 17 miles above St. Louis. For description see page 1149, Annual Report for 1932. The river is commercially navigable from Sioux City, Iowa, to the mouth, a distance of 732 miles. The portion of project in Kansas City District extends from Rulo, Nebraska, to the mouth, a distance of 498 miles. Previous Projects. For details see page 1891 of Annual Report for 1915, and pages 1153 and 1175 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. A channel of 9-foot depth and width not less than 300 feet, obtained by revetment of banks, construction of permeable dikes to contract and stabilize the waterways, cutoffs to eliminate long bends, closing minor channels, removal of snags, and dredging as required. The improved reach within the Kansas City District extends from the mouth to Rulo, Nebraska, a distance of 498.4 miles. The Bank Stabilization and Navigation features of the project were completed in September 1980. For the reach from Rulo, Nebraska, to the mouth, the total construction cost was $237,943,190 including $8,665,594 for previous project. River access sites have been completed at 11 locations. Ordinary and extreme stage fluctuations are 16 and 38 feet, respectively. Local cooperation. Cooperation from benefited localities may be required where any improvement may confer special benefit. The receipt of contributions from private parties are to be expended along with Government funds upon authorized work where such work would be in the interest of navigation, as authorized by 1915 Rivers and Harbors Act. Secretary of the Army approved general principle of cooperative construction on Missouri River below Kansas City on basis that 25 percent of cost of any special installation shall be paid by the United States and 75 percent by local interests. Total contributed by local interests in cooperation with the United States from 1918 to June 30, 1964, was $675,663, of which $8,647 was returned to contributors. Local interests must share in cost of recreation facilities in accordance with provisions of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Local interests have contributed $171,816 for cost sharing on construction of recreation in addition to constructing portions of the facility. Terminal facilities. A listing of terminal facilities are included in Missouri River Navigation Charts and can be obtained from Kansas City District Engineer for a small fee. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance of dikes and revetments along the lower river was accomplished by contract. Field hired labor accomplished emergency repair of dikes and revetments on the upper reach of the river within the district. District personnel also accomplished other work items: Channel reconnaissance, stream gauging condition studies, surveys and mapping, engineering and design, surveys and layouts of construction, and supervision and administration. Project tonnage on the river for CY 1998 is estimated at 6.6 million tons, excluding waterway improvement materials. District estimates the recreation use on the Missouri River (MRK) at 1.2 million recreation days annually. 2. MISSOURI RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE MITIGATION, IA, NE, KS, and MO Location. This project extends along the Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, to the Mouth near St. Louis, a river distance of 732 miles. This location is coincident with the Bank Stabilization and Navigation Project on the river. Existing project. The project is to mitigate losses of fish and wildlife habitat resulting from construction and operation of the Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation Project. The four major components of the plan are restoration of aquatic habitat on public and non-public lands (2,500 acres), preservation of aquatic habitat on public and non-public lands subject to the effects of riverbed degradation (700 acres), acquisition and development of existing undeveloped habitat on private lands (28,000 acres), and development of terrestrial wildlife habitat on existing undeveloped public lands (16,900 acres). Estimated fully funded cost of the project (1997) is $79,100,000, all Federal. Both the Kansas city and Omaha Districts are involved in the implementation of the project, with Kansas City District involvement directed mainly to sites in Kansas and Missouri. Local cooperation.There is no non-Federal sponsor for the project. The states of Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas, and Missouri are voluntarily serving on a coordinating team which is actively involved in ongoing project activities. Operations during fiscal year. Funding was continued for land acquisition and construction of mitigation features. Land was purchased at the following sites: Blackbird- Tieville-Decatur, Iowa and Nebraska; and Nottleman Island, Iowa; and construction activities took place at Bryans Island, Berger Bend, and Nishnabotna. Design activities were also carried out at Blackbird-Tieville-Decatur, Iowa and Nebraska; Overton Bottoms, and Lower Hamburg, Missouri. Flood Control 3. BLUE RIVER BASIN, KANSAS CITY, MO Location. Along the left bank of the Blue River from U.S. Highway 71 upstream for a distance of about 1-1/4 miles in Jackson County, Missouri, to the Bannister Federal Complex levee. Existing project. The recommended project includes construction of approximately 1-1/4 miles of levee to provide flood protection to 280 acres in the Dodson 27- 2 KANSAS CITY MO DISTRICT Industrial Area and surrounding area in Kansas City. Estimated Federal cost through construction of the project (2003) is $12,000,000, and estimated non-Federal cost of lands damages and relocations is $$5,100,000. Local Cooperation. The city of Kansas City provided a letter of assurance, dated November 17, 1995, officially stating its intent to cost share the project. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction engineering and design continues with preparation of the design memorandum and plans and specifications. 4. BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO Location. Along the Blue River and tributaries in Jackson County, Missouri. Existing Project. Preliminary plans consist of 12.5 miles of improved channel along the Blue River within Kansas City, Missouri. Estimated Federal cost through construction of the project (1998) is $211,000,000, and estimated non- Federal cost of lands, damages and relocations is $32,500,000. Local Cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. The City of Kansas City, Missouri, passed a resolution of intent on December 9, 1975 to provide the required assurances of local cooperation when requested. The Section 221 agreement was signed by the Kansas City District Engineer on September 8, 1983. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is complete and final designs are underway. All work on stages 1 and 2 has been completed. This included construction of the First and Second contracts, Pile Stabilization, Contaminated Sediments and the Paved Reach contracts. In addition, eight railroad bridges required alterations. The Stage 3 reach of the project consists of four construction contracts. Plans and specifications are completed and the construction contracts have been awarded for the 12h to 19 h Street and the 19t h Street to Stadium Drive reaches. Plans and Specifications for the Stadium Drive to Brush Creek and Brush Creek to 63rd Street contracts have been initiated. The railroad relocation contracts with the Kansas City Southern, Missouri Pacific and the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroads have been awarded. Construction of the Kansas City Southern Railroad Bridge is complete. Construction of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Bridges has commenced. Plans for the Missouri Pacific Railroad Bridges have been initiated. Construction of one of the Missouri Pacific Bridges has been completed. 5. BRUSH CREEK, KANSAS CITY, MO Location. A major tributary of the Blue River in Kansas City, Missouri, and Johnson County, Kansas, draining a highly urbanized 29-square-mile area in the two states. Existing project. The authorized project consists of improving about 7,500 feet of the channel from near Roanoke Parkway downstream to near Troost Avenue in Kansas City. At the request of the sponsor, Kansas City, Missouri, a modified project was built which provides identical flood protection, but which also accommodates park and recreation development in the authorized reach. Estimated fully funded Federal cost of the modified project (1996) is $14,464,000; and estimated non-Federal cost of lands, damages, and cash is $19,526,000. Local cooperation. The City of Kansas City and the Corps of Engineers entered into a Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) on the project in March 1991. Operations during fiscal year. The dedication of the project was in June 1995. The project was turned over to the local sponsor in January 1997. 6. CLINTON LAKE, WAKARUSA RIVER, KS Location. Damsite is on Wakarusa River about 4 miles southwest of Lawrence, in Douglas County, Kansas. The lake extends into Shawnee and Osage Counties, Kansas. Existing project.An earthfill dam about 9,250 feet long constructed to a height of about 114 feet with an uncontrolled spillway in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity 397,200 acre-feet (258,300 for flood control, 28,500 for sediment reserve, and 110,400 of multipurpose storage for municipal and industrial wast supply and recreation). Cost of constructing the completed project was $57,415,433. Construction was initiated in January 1972, and the project was placed in operation in November 1977. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Reimbursement in the estimated amount of $6,768,000 is required for water supply storage in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958. A contract was signed by the State on September 6, 1978 and was approved by the Secretary of the Army on October 30, 1978. Utilization of storage was initiated in December 1979. Repayment also began at that time. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1998 was 6,593,264 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 7. HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, NE Location. Dam is on main stem of Republican River about 235 miles above confluence of stream with Smoky Hill River. Site is in Harlan County, 1-1/2 miles south of Republican City and 13 miles west of Franklin, Nebraska. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 107 feet above streambed with a total length of 11,827 feet, including a gate-controlled, concrete, gravity-type spillway section near the center of dam. Reservoir provides storage capacity of 850,000 acre-feet (500,000 for flood control and 350,000 for irrigation and sedimentation allowance). Initial cost of constructing the project was $45,279,532. Total Federal cost 27- 3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TI-IF ARMY ON CTVII. WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 199R of project, including $1,017,623 for major rehabilitation work and $1,832,394 supplemental recreation development (Code 710), is $48,129,549. Construction of the project was initiated in August 1946. The project was placed in operation in December 1952. Major rehabilitation work was completed in FY 1968. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1998 was 7,547,200 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. Study of future operation. The Study of Future Operation at Harlan County Lake was delayed in FY 1996, FY 1997, and FY 1998 pending receipt of revised hydrology analyses from the Bureau of Reclamation (BOR). The purpose of the study is to develop an operating plan to serve the best public interest for Harlan County Lake under depleted inflow conditions. The study remains on hold; however, coordination with the BOR continues and we continue to provide input into BOR's Republican River Basin EIS. We also respond to requests from Department of Justice (DOJ) on the Kansas and Nebraska lawsuit on the Republican River Compact. 8. HILLSDALE LAKE, BIG BULL CREEK, KS Location. The project is located approximately 12 miles above the mouth of Big Bull Creek, a tributary of the Marais des Cygnes River and about 2'/ miles west of Hillsdale, in Miami County, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill embankment about 11,600 feet long (including approximately 3,300 feet of dike section) about 75 feet above rising valley flood plain. The spillway is gravity type uncontrolled and the outlet works are controlled. The total reservoir storage capacity is 160,000 acre-feet (81,000 for flood control, 11,000 for sediment reserve, and 68,000 for multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Construction was initiated in December 1974, and the project was placed in operation in October 1981. Federal cost of construction was $64,161,400. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act 1938, applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $21,145,338 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. The Kansas Water Resources Board signed a contract in January 1974, approved by the Secretary of the Army in April 1974, for the entire 53,000 acre-feet of water supply storage. The Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks has s 50-year lease on 12,880 acres for management of land and water areas for public park, recreational, and fish and wildlife purposes. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1998 was 1,253,357 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 9. KANOPOLIS LAKE, SMOKY HILL RIVER, KS Location. The dam is on the Smoky Hill River about 184 river miles above the mouth of the stream, and about 11 miles northwest of Marquette, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 131 feet above streambed, having a total length of 15,360 feet, including 4,070 feet of dike section on the left abutment and 2,550 feet of dike section on right abutment. The reservoir provides storage capacity of 450,000 acre-feet, (400,000 for flood control and 50,000 for recreation and streamflow regulation). Outlet works and spillway are in right abutment. Initial cost of constructing the project was $12,327,735. Total Federal cost of project, including $249,492, supplemental recreational development (Code 710), was $12,577,227. Construction was initiated in June 1940, and project was placed in operation in May 1948. Local Cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1998 was 1,713,300 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 10. LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO Location. This project consists of two lakes in Jackson County, Missouri, located in Kansas City, Missouri, and suburban communities. The Blue Springs Lake site is on the East Fork of the Little Blue River about V2 mile south of U,S. Highway 40, and the Longview Lake site is on the main stem at approximately 109t Street. Existing Project. The Blue Springs dam is an earthfill embankment about 2,500 feet long and rising about 78 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled service spillway and uncontrolled outlet conduit. The total reservoir storage capacity is 26,600 acre-feet (15,700 for flood control, 10,600 for multipurpose storage for water quality and recreation, and 300 for sedimentation). The Longview dam is an earthfill embankment about 1,900 feet long and rising about 120 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled service spillway and an uncontrolled outlet conduit. The total reservoir storage capacity is 46,900 acrefeet (24,300 for flood control and 20,600 for multipurpose storage for water quality and recreation, and 2,000 for sedimentation). Federal cost (1992) for both lakes through construction of the project was $140,809,200. Construction was initiated in September 1977, and the project became operational in September 1988 Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of June 28,1938 applies. Local interest must share in separable costs allocated to recreation in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. The Jackson County Legislature approved a recreation cost-sharing contract on July 5, 1974 which was approved by the Secretary of the Army on June 24, 1976. A supplemental agreement, signed by Jackson County officials on June 5, 1978, and approved by the Secretary of the Army January 10, 1979, revised the 27- 4 KANSAS CITY_ MO ISTRICT existing contract to include additional costs involved in raising the multipurpose pool elevation at the Blue Springs Lake. Reimbursement for recreation was $15,047,000 of which $450,000 was accomplished during construction by local interests. Operations during fiscal year. Project is complete. Land acquisition is complete. Visitation for FY 1998 was 4,168,467 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 11. LONG BRANCH LAKE, LITTLE CHARITON RIVER, MO Location. The damsite is on the East Fork Little Chariton River in north-central Missouri about 2 miles west of Macon in Macon County. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 3,800 feet long and about 71 feet high with an uncontrolled outlet conduit and an uncontrolled service spillway in the right abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 65,000 acre-feet (29,000 for flood control, 4,000 for sediment reserve, and 32,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, fish and wildlife, and recreation). Estimated Federal cost (1997) is $20,288,000, and estimated non-Federal cost is $3,605,000. Construction was initiated in March 1973. The project was placed in useful operation for flood control on September 1, 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $5,567,000 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958 and share in separable cost of $3,589,000 allocated to recreation in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. On September 15, 1972 the Secretary of the Army approved a contract signed by the City of Macon, Missouri, for water supply and recreation development. Missouri state agencies indicated their intent to sponsor future water supply and signed a contract on June 17, 1977 to sponsor recreational development in lieu of the City of Macon. After review by the Office of the Secretary of the Army, the state signed the contract in December 1979, and it was approved by the Secretary of the Army on April 18, 1980. Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to this contract was approved December 28, 1993 to provide for additional recreational facilities. Additional facilities have been designed Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1998 was 1,210,100 visitor hours. Project is 100 percent complete on scheduled work. The remaining unscheduled work is construction of recreation facilities. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 12. MELVERN LAKE, MARAIS DES CYGNES (OSAGE) RIVER, KS Location. Damsite is on Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River in Osage County, Kansas, about 4 miles west of Melvern, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 9,700 feet long and about 98 feet high with an uncontrolled chute-type spillway in the left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 363,000 acre-feet (200,000 for flood control, 26,000 for sediment reserve, and 137,000 for multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Cost of constructing the completed project was $37,436,530. Construction was initiated in July 1967, and the project was placed in operation in August 1972. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Project storage was reallocated in 1989 to include municipal and industrial water supply in accordance with provisions of the Water Supply Act of 1958. In accordance with the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding between the State of Kansas and the Department of the Army dated 1985, payment in full of $7,131,834 for 50,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was made in March 1995. Utilization of storage for water supply was initiated in September 1993 under an interim contract and continues under the current contract signed in January 1995. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1998 was 5,824,300 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance and connection to Rural Water District at Turkey Point Park. 13. MILFORD LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, KS Location. The damsite is on the Republican River near the village of Alida about 10 miles above confluence of Republican and Smoky Hill Rivers which form Kansas River; and about 4 miles northwest of Junction City, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 6,300 feet long and 126 feet high with an uncontrolled service-chute spillway in a saddle on right abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 1,160,000 acre-feet (700,000 for flood control, 160,000 for sediment reserve and 300,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Water supply storage is included in the project at the request of the Governor of Kansas under provisions of the Federal Water Supply Act of 1958. Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $48,268,843. Total Federal cost of project, including $1,297,649 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), was $49,566,492. Construction was initiated in July 1961. The project was placed in operation in June 1965. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $12,162,134 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. Utilization of storage for water supply was initiated in October 1984. Reimbursement was initiated, at the option of the State, in September 1976. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1998 was 5,587,600 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities included 27 - 5 REPORT OF THF SRCRFTARY OF THF ARMY ON CIVI. WORKS ACTIVITTS FOR FY 199R ordinary operation and maintenance and tornado damage repair in the Rolling Hills Park. 14. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM IA, NE, KS AND MO (RULO, NE, TO MOUTH) Location. On both banks of the Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, about 760 miles to the mouth near St. Louis, Missouri. The portion of the project in Kansas City District extends from Rulo, Nebraska, 498 miles to mouth. Existing project. A series of levee units and appurtenant works along both sides of Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, to the mouth, for protection of agricultural lands and small communities against floods. Estimated fully funded (1998) for the active portion of the project from Rulo, Nebraska, to mouth is $131,748,000, including $95,832,000 Federal and $22,193,000 non-Federal contributions, and costs of $13,723,000 for lands and damages are to be borne by local interests. Remaining portion of project consists of units on which planning and construction are being delayed pending restudy to assure that additional levee construction is economically justified. Current cost estimate for deferred, inactive, and deauthorized portion of project Rulo, Nebraska, to mouth is $168,865,000 (1964, 1986, and 1987 price levels), of which $153,233,000 is Federal cost for construction and $15,632,000 for lands and damages to be borne by local interests. Construction of the project was initiated in June 1948. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 applies. Fully complied with for all completed units and units under construction. Local sponsors provide all operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Status of individual units of active portion at end of fiscal year is shown in Table 27-H on Missouri River Levee System. Unit L385 was approved for construction in FY 1994. Planning on Unit L142 continued. The Project Cooperation Agreement on Unit L385 was executed September 23,1997. 15. PERRY LAKE, DELAWARE RIVER, KS Location. The damsite is on the Delaware River about 5 miles above the mouth in Jefferson County, and about 3 miles northwest of Perry, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 7,750 feet long constructed to an elevation about 95 feet above valley floor with gated-outlet works and an uncontrolled spillway in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 770,000 acrefeet (480,000 for flood control, including 140,000 for sediment reserve and 150,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Water supply storage is included in the project plan at the request of the State of Kansas under provisions of the Federal Water Supply Act of 1958. Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $48,371,706. Total Federal cost of project, including $724,212 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $49,095,918. Construction was initiated in March 1964, and the project was placed in operation in January 1969. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $8,551,805 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. Utilization of storage for water supply was initiated in October 1991. Reimbursement was initiated at the option of the State in September 1978. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1998 was 6,064,800 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities included ordinary operation and maintenance. 16. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (KANSAS CITY DIST.) Location. Flood control improvements included in this project are on and along the Missouri River and several of its principle tributaries, in states comprising the Missouri River Basin. Existing project. The Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin provides for levees along Missouri River between Sioux City, Iowa, and the mouth, flood-protection works at certain municipalities, and reservoirs on main stem of Missouri River and on tributaries for control of flooding. (See Table 27-B for authorizing legislation and Table 27-I on Kansas City District projects included in Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program.) See individual project reports. 17. POMME DE TERRE LAKE POMME DE TERRE RIVER, MO Location. The dam is on the main stem Pomme de Terre River, about 44 miles above the mouth in Hickory County, Missouri. The lake extends upstream into Polk County, Missouri. The site is about 4 miles south of Hermitage, Missouri, and 20 miles north of Bolivar, Missouri. Existing project. An earth and rockfill dam about 4,630 feet long constructed to about 155 feet above riverbed and a dike section on left abutment about 2,790 feet long, providing storage capacity of 650,000 acre-feet (407,000 for flood control and 243,000 for sedimentation and nultipurpose). Initial cost of constructing the complete project was $14,946,784. Total Federal cost of project, including $329,140 area redevelopment and $2,089,529 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $17,365,453. Construction was initiated in January 1957, and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1961. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1998 was 13,708,113 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 18. POMONA LAKE, ONE HUNDRED TEN MILE CREEK, KS 27- 6 KANSAS CITY MO flISTRICT Location. The dam is on One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, a tributary of Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River, 7 miles above mouth of stream in Osage County, Kansas, about 8 miles northwest of Pomona, Kansas, and 34 miles upstream from Ottawa, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam 7,750 feet long constructed to an average height of about 85 feet above streambed, with gated-outlet works and an ungated chutetype spillway near left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 230,000 acre-feet (160,000 for flood control, 14,000 for sediment reserve, and 56,000 of multipurpose storage for water quality control, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $13,272,108. Total Federal cost of project, including $731,130 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), was $14,003,238. Construction began in July 1959, and the project was placed in operation in October 1963. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Pomona has water supply reimbursement under Water Supply Act of 1958 totaling $862,923. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1998 was 3,530,790 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 19. RATHBUN LAKE, CHARITON RIVER, IA Location. The damsite is on the Chariton River about 7 miles north of Centerville and 1 mile north of Rathbun, Appanoose County, Iowa. Existing project. An earthfill dam 10,600 feet long constructed to an elevation about 86 feet above valley floor, with gated-outlet works and an uncontrolled service chute with paved sill spillway about a mile upstream from left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 552,000 acrefeet (339,000 for flood control, 24,000 for sediment reserve and 189,000 of multipurpose storage for navigation, water quality control, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the project was $27,033,210. Total Federal cost of project, including $588,948 supplemental recreation development (Code 710), was $27,622,158. Construction of the project was initiated in September 1964 and completed in November 1969. The operating plan for this project was revised to reduce flood control releases during critical times of the year to allow local farmers better access during planting and harvesting and to facilitate field drainage and drying out. The revised plan has resulted in more frequent high pool elevations than anticipated, which has inundated roads and recreation facilities. A shoreline erosion study was accomplished; and a supplement to the master plan was approved, which resulted in relocation of recreation facilities and bank stabilization work to compensate for the higher lake levels. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1998 was 6,052,700 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities included ordinary operation and maintenance. 20. SMITHVILLE LAKE, LITTLE PLATTE RIVER, MO Location. The damsite is on the Little Platte River about 1 mile northeast of Smithville and about 5 miles north of Kansas City, in Clay and Clinton Counties, Missouri. Existing project. Earthfill dam about 4,200 feet long and 95 feet high with an uncontrolled service spillway. A dike about 2,400 feet long crosses a saddle in the left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 246,500 acre-feet (92,000 for flood control, 52,300 for sediment reserve, and 102,200 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Cost of constructing the project was $87,685,314. Construction was initiated in November 1973, and the project was placed in operation in March 1982. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Reimbursement of $24,000,000 will be required for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958, and reimbursement of $7,500,000 will be required for recreation development in accordance with Federal Water Recreation Act of 1965. Additional non- Federal contribution for recreation amounts to $737,000. All contracts for local cooperation were approved by the Secretary of the Army on November 27, 1972. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1998 was 6,720,700 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 21. TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, BIG BLUE RIVER, KS Location. The dam is on the main stem of the Big Blue River, about 12 miles above the stream mouth in Riley and Pottawatomie Counties, Kansas. Site is about 5 miles north of Manhattan, Kansas. Existing project. An earth and rock dam 7,500 feet long and 157 feet high. Total reservoir storage capacity is 2,346,000 acre-feet (1,933,000 for flood control, 228,000 for sediment reserve and 185,000 for multipurpose storage, for low-flow regulation, navigation, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $80,051,031. Total Federal cost of project, including $533,048 supplemental recreational development (ode 710), was $80,584,079. Construction began in October 1952. Project was placed in Operation in July 1962. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1998 was 2,437,400 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities included ordinary operation and maintenance, replacement of emergency gate guides, and relief well rejuvenation. 27- 7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIl. WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 199R 22. WILSON LAKE, SALINE RIVER, KS Location.The dam is on the Saline River about 130 miles above its mouth, near the eastern edge of Russell County, Kansas, about 50 miles west of Salina, 10 miles north of Wilson, and 20 miles east of Russell, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 5,600 feet long and 160 feet high with a gated-outlet works, chute spillway, storage capacity is 776,000 acre-feet (511,000 for flood control, 40,000 for sediment reserve and 225,000 multipurpose storage for irrigation, navigation, and low-flow regulation). Initial cost of constructing the project was $20,015,023. Total Federal cost of project, including $448,344 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), was $20,463,367. Construction began in April 1961, and the project was placed in operation in December 1964. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1998 was 1,764,700 Visitor hours. Maintenance: Activity included ordinary operation and maintenance. 23. SCHEDULING OF FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Under sections 7 and 9, 1944 Flood Control Act, the Corps is responsible for detailed scheduling of operations concerning storage capacity reserved for or assigned to flood control in reservoirs constructed by Bureau of Reclamation as well as those constructed by the Corps. Fiscal Year costs were $323,000. 24. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, P.L. 738, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within boundaries of their respective district. Fiscal Year costs were $ 586,365. (See Table 27-J on inspection of completed flood control projects.) Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 25. HARRY S. TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OSAGE RIVER, MO Location. The damsite is on the main stem of the Osage River about 1.5 miles northwest of Warsaw, Benton County, Missouri. Reservoir extends into Bates, Henry, Hickory, St. Clair, and Vernon Counties, Missouri. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 5,000 feet long constructed to an average height of about 96 feet above streambed, including a gate-controlled overfall spillway and a power installation consisting of six inclined pumpgenerating units with a combined generating capability of 160,000 kilowatts. Total reservoir storage capacity is 5,202,000 acre-feet (3,918,000 for flood control, 244,000 for sediment reserve, and 1,040,000 multipurpose storage for power, low-flow regulation, and recreation). The operating purposes of the project are flood control, hydroelectric power, water supply, recreation, and fish and wildlife. Public Law 91-267, approved May 26, 1970, authorized a change in project name from Kaysinger Bluff Dam and Reservoir, Osage River Basin, Missouri, to the Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir. Estimated cost (1997) through construction of the project is $550,909,900. Construction of relocated Missouri Highway M-13 was initiated September 1964 and completed May 1966. Construction of the dam and reservoir was initiated in October 1964. The project was operational for flood control in October 1979, and multipurpose pool was reached in November 1979. The first power unit was placed on line on December 22, 1979. Subsequent problems with the turbine bearings required remedial design on the bearings. Restricted commercial power production began in April 1982. Through September 1998, power generation totaled 4,823,193,000 kilowatt hours. Of the gross income from the sale of power by Southwestern Power Administration, $110,532,349 was allocated to the Corps of Engineers for project power operating costs, interest, and investment recovery. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operation during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1998 was 13,933,300 visitor hours. Project is complete. During FY 1998, 317,067,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power were generated. Maintenance activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance, continuation of turbine repair and final payment to City of Clinton for relocation of sewer facilities. 26. STOCKTON LAKE,SAC RIVER, MO Location. The damsite is on the Sac River about 49.5 miles above its confluence with the Osage River, and about 1 mile east of Stockton, Cedar County, Missouri. The lake extends into Dade and Polk Counties. Existing project. A rock-shell dam with impervious core about 5,100 feet long constructed to an average height of about 128 feet, with a gated overfall spillway and a 45,200- kilowatt power installation. Total reservoir storage capacity is 1,674,000 acre-feet (774,000 for flood control, 25,000 for sediment reserve and 875,000 multipurpose storage for power and recreation). The authorized project purposes are flood control, hydroelectric power, water quality, water supply, recreation, and fish and wildlife. Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $75,715,300. Cost of the project, including $3,758,000 for downstream channel work and $502,057 for supplemental recreational 27- 8 KANSAS ITY MO ISTRICT development (Code 710), was $79,975,357. Construction was initiated in October 1963, and the project was placed in operation in December 1969. Power operation problems were encountered with the initial operation in March 1973 because the downstream channel did not have the capacity which earlier observations and computations indicated. As a result, it has been necessary to restrict the power operation to about the 30,000 kilowatt level. Right-of-way for construction of a channel cutoff and bridge at Horseshoe Bend were acquired, and construction completed. Sloughing easements downstream to Caplinger Mills were acquired. Completion assured downstream channel capacity to Caplinger Mills of 8,000 c.f.s. for powerplant operation. Discharge in this range will accommodate power operations at a 39,500-kilowatt level. Through September 1998, power generation totaled 1,598,478,000 kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from the sale of power by Southwestern Power Administration, $31,624,986 was allocated to the Corps of Engineers for project operating costs, interest, and investment recovery. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1998 was 7,740,400 visitor hours. The project is complete and in operational status. During FY 1998, 44,820,000 kilowatthours of electrical power were generated. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance and replacement of generator exciter. Work Under Special Authories 27. CONTINUING AUTHORITIES Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80 th Cong., June 30, 1948, as amended). Each project selected must be complete in itself, economically and environmentally justified, and limited to a Federal cost of not more than $5 million. The local sponsoring agency must agree to provide without cost to the Department of the Army, all lands, easements, and rights-ofway, including highway bridge, and utility relocations and alterations; hold and save the Department of the Army free from damages; maintain and operate the project after completion; assume all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limit; and prevent future encroachments on improved channels. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 requires the non-Federal sponsors of Section 205 projects to pay 50 percent of all feasibility study costs over $100,000. For structural flood control projects, the sponsor must pay in cash during the construction at least 5 percent of the construction cost. The sponsor's cash and other contributions must equal 35 percent of the total construction cost, but will not be required to exceed 50 percent. There were no Section 205 projects under construction in Fiscal Year 1998. See Table K for expenditures under Section 205 during Fiscal Year 1998. Emergency Streambank Protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., July 24, 1946) as amended. Each project selected must be complete in itself, engineering feasible, economically justifiable environmentally acceptable, and limited to a Federal statutory cost of not more than $1,000,000. The local sponsoring entity must agree to provide without cost to the Department of the Army, all lands, easements, and rights-ofway, including highway, highway bridge, and utility relocations and alterations required for project construction; provide over the period of construction, an amount equal to not less than 35 percent or more than 50 percent of total project cost, at least 5 percent of which will be cash; operate, maintain, repair, replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion; hold and save the Department of the Army free from damages arising from the construction, operation, and maintenance of the completed project; and assume all project costs in excess of the Federal statutory cost limit. Construction was completed on one project in FY 1998 that will be financially completed in FY 1999, as follows: Marmaton River, Vernon County Road, MO-Project was completed and turned over to the sponsor in February 1998. See Table 27-K for Emergency Streambank Protection expenditures during FY 1998. Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment (Section 1135, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 662, 9 9 th Cong., November 17, 1986). Section 1135 authorizes review of the operation of completed water resources projects to determine need for modifications for the purpose of improving environmental quality. No projects were completed in FY 1998. See Table 27-K for Section 1135 studies status and expenditures for FY 1998. 28. EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACTIVITIES A. Disaster Preparedness Program. The Disaster Preparedness Program (DPP) involves planning, training, inspection, supplies and equipment, and personnel. Planning activities involve development of District response and recovery plans in support of natural disasters. Current plans within the District include the District' Response Plan, Emergency Operations Center Plan, Emergency Alert and Dismissal Plan, Emergency Operations and Disaster Assistance-Deployment Plan, as well as the District Corrective Action Plan. 27- 9 REPORT OF TH SRCRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVI. WORKS ACTIVITTIS FOR FY 199 Training activities to support disaster preparedness this year included both internal District employee training on maintaining flood fighting expertise and the Corps' role under the Federal Response Plan as well as training and conferences with State and local officials. During this FY in-house District training in preparation for potential flood fighting efforts was conducted during the Spring 1998. This training proved to be worthwhile, since the District responded to two flood events during April 1997. This flood event resulted in 14 levee units requesting rehabilitation assistance due to damages sustained during these flood events. Disaster preparedness includes maintaining the necessary supplies and equipment to support disaster response. To support flood fighting efforts and technical assistance to the state and local officials, an inventory is maintained of over 1.5 million sandbags and over 40 pumps for flood fighting. B. Public Law 84-99. Rehabilitation of Flood Control Works. The bulk of the District's efforts during this FY have continued to focus on the fiscal close-out of levee rehabilitation projects following flood events over the past four years. C. Catastrophic Disaster Response Planning. New Madrid Seismic Zone Earthquake Planning. In accordance with The Federal Response Plan and USACE response planning guidance, the Kansas City District has responsibility for overall coordination for Corps of Engineers support to the state of Missouri. The Kansas City District has actively participated in the development of a Corps of Engineers catastrophic disaster response plan for the New Madrid Seismic Zone (NMSZ). The NMSZ is an earthquake zone that could potentially cause a disaster of catastrophic proportions with national security implications. The deliberate planning process is being used to integrate the response and recovery phases of a NMSZ event for all impacted Corps districts and divisions within the NMSZ. General Investigations 29. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS Fiscal year 1998 costs totaled $1,815,990.23 for all General Investigations activities. See Table 27-L which covers Surveys, Collection and Study of Basic Data and Preconstruction Engineering and Design expenditures in FY 1998. Other Activities 30. MISSISSIPPI RIVER MAIN STEM. 31. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM FY 1998 expenditures of $104,435 provided for activities required for local and national preparedness. 32. MISSOURI RIVER BASIN COLLABORATIVE WATER RESOURCES, PLANNING/ PARTNERING PROCESS Missouri River Basin Association and the Corps will manage and facilitate the process of collaboration for some limited studies. The collaborative effort allows input from the states, tribes, and Federal agencies economic and environmental interest groups and the general public on both the operation issues, i.e. Master Manual, and nonoperational issues. In addition, the collaborative process could address recreation industry development, ecosystem management, streambank erosion, project mitigation, structural changes for endangered species, environmental monitoring tribal water rights, and support to navigation and agriculture. Fiscal Year costs were $99,602. 33. REGULATORY PROGRAM Statutes. The Corps of Engineers is charged with protecting the public interest in all waters of the United States, including wetlands. This is accomplished through a Department of the Army permit program pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Operations during Fiscal Year 1998. Kansas City District completed 2,780 permit actions during the year. Of the 94 violations reported and evaluated this year, 88 were resolved by permits or voluntary restoration or administrative action. Special projects or emphases during the year included reviewing dredging data for all commercial dredgers on the Kansas River (18 sites); continued monitoring of impacts to endangered species from 7 permits issued for gravel excavation on the Neosho River; evaluated the permit for a major proposal for a NASCAR speedway involving consultation with three Native American Tribes; continued coordination on controversial highway projects in Lawrence, KS, and St. Louis Co., MO; completion of a general permit for dead tree removal at Harry S. Truman Lake; development of a programmatic permit at Lake of the Ozarks and for strip mining reclamation activities in Southeast KS. Fiscal Year costs totaled $2,505,057 for all regulatory activities. See Table M which shows expenditures for Permit Evaluation and Enforcement. No activities this fiscal year. 27 - 10 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 27-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep 30,1998 1. Missouri River, New Work: Sioux City, IA to Mouth (Rulo, NE, to Mouth) (Federal Funds) Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 2. Missouri River Fish & Wildlife Mitigation, IA, NE,KS & MO 3. Blue River Basin Kansas City, MO 4. Blue River Channel Kansas City, MO (Federal Funds) Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 5. Brush Creek, Kansas City, MO (Federal Funds) Contributed Funds Authorized Project Expanded Project, Consolidated Summary Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp- Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 5,491,000 .5,185,248 5,418,000 4,370,000 1/ 5,394,000 5,460,049 5,006,345 5,499,400 237,942,190 1/ 237,942,190 1/ 332,460,774 2/ 331,994,129 3/ 816,190 816,190 22,642 22,642 5,491,000 5,185,248 4,991,000 3,082,885 5,418,000 4,370,000 5,394,000 5,460,049 5,006,345 5,499,400 2,648,000 1,734,000 2,950,000 4,503,381 1,860,790 2,917,728 7,000 6,914 2,807,000 1,772,387 330,891 32,887 312,000 309,974 558,000 537,624 9,517,000 7,623,000 23,224,000 13,672,495 7,598,503 23,229,700 7,035,000 1,611,274 1,597,981 -1,000,000 1,909,237 3,137,891 16,552,000 7,623,000 22,224,000 1,805,274 15,283,769 9,196,484 25,138,937 1,711,000 2,150,100 5,655 704,522 1,711,000 2,860,277 -50,000 -78,417 60,000 -233,000 96,569 -283,000 78,152 176,000 196,529 10,455 -35,482 176,000 171,502 15,880 -116,233 -703,765 117,582 238,758,380 1/ 238,758,380 1/ 332,483,416 2/ 332,016,770 3/ 18,636,000 18,556,356 877,000 854,512 114,986,171 114,964,117 6,738,041 5,420,950 51 121,724,212 120,385,067 5/ 14,390,000 14,369,435 1,225,767 1,225,767 5,725,235 6,051,500 6/ 21,341,002 21,646,702 6/ 27-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 27-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep 30, 1998 6. Clinton Lake, New Work: Wakarusa River, KS 7. Harlan County Lake, Republican River, NE 8. Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, KS 9. Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS 10. Little Blue River Lakes, Little Blue River, MO 11. Long Branch Lake Little Chariton River, MO Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 12. Melvern Lake Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,409,000 1,397,900 1,534,000 1,563,550 730,000 730,000 1,189,700 1,214,524 755,000 749,555 778,000 910,044 31,380 41,905 31,380 41,905 1,782,000 1,799,057 27-12 1,421,000 1,374,000 1,498,000 1,414,590 1,391,356 1,493,154 1,529,000 1,477,000 1,538,711 1,449,128 1,333,000 1,128,655 774,000 978,231 1,748,000 1,524,000 1,615,900 1,644,406 898,000 874,775 722,000 724,290 44,707 44,707 715,000 741,235 736,000 697,100 1,348 1,348 1,598,000 1,623,000 1,596,101 1,606,853 1,502,000 1,528,992 773,000 773,114 1,266,000 1,292,359 787,000 789,435 834,000 877,245 1,611,000 1,631,492 57,415,433 57,415,433 2/ 24,171,000 24,166,000 47,111,926 47,111,926 / 34,084,984 34,077,983 1,017,623 1,017,623 64,161,400 64,161,400 12,366,870 12,366,870 12,577,227 12,577,227 9/ 33,118,312 33,115,812 140,809,200 140,809,200 10 8,990,784 8,990,784 18,216,177 18,216,177 11,149,112 11,149,112 1,139,455 1,139,332 II 19,355,632 19,355,509 37,436,530 37,436,530 29,620,154 29,620,154 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 27-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY98 Sep 30,1998 13. Milford Lake, New Work: Republican River, Approp. -- -- -- -- 49,566,492 KS Cost -- -- -- -- 49,566,492 Maint. Approp. 1,983,000 2,091,500 4,594,000 3/ 1,622,000 40,101,940 Cost 2,318,324 2,193,483 4,413,833 4/ 1,812,038 40,101,940 14. Missouri River New Work: Levee System Approp. 421,000 115,000 298,000 907,000 66,285,851 IA, NE, KS Cost 308,814 316,089 249,182 859,101 66,172,850 and MO 15. Perry Lake, New Work: Delaware River, KS Approp. -- -- -- -- 49,095,918 Cost -- -- -- -- 49,095,918 Maint. Approp. 1,792,000 1,629,000 1,757,000 1,768,000 37,817,343 Cost 1,823,555 1,627,100 1,758,054 1,771,291 37,817,343 17. Pomme de Terre New Work: Lake, Pomme de Approp. -- -- -- -- 17,365,452 Terre River, MO Cost -- -- -- -- 17,365,452 Maint. Approp. 2,227,000 1,823,000 1,849,000 1,721,000 35,982,461 Cost 2,273,500 1,805,557 1,850,621 1,736,822 35,982,461 18. Pomona Lake, One New Work: Hundred Ten Mile Approp. -- -- -- -- 14,003,238 Creek, KS Cost -- -- -- -- 14,003,238 Maint. Approp. 2,127,500 2,173,000 1,704,000 1,564,000 32,286,070 Cost 2,153,924 2,171,733 1,698,224 1,572,043 32,286,070 19. Rathbun Lake, New Work: Chariton River, Approp. -- -- -- -- 27,622,159 IA Cost -- -- -- -- 27,622,159 Maint. Approp. 2,369,000 2,062,500 1,928,000 1,928,000 41,712,211 Cost 2,825,988 2,126,882 1,948,639 1,918,090 41,694,778 20. Smithville Lake, New Work: Little Platte Approp. -- -- -- -- 87,685,314 River, MO Cost -- -- -- -- 87,685,314 Maint. Approp. 1,171,400 1,013,000 969,000 1,012,000 17,100,848 Cost 1,204,270 920,636 1,051,859 989,947 17,069,211 21. Tuttle Creek Lake New Work: Big Blue Approp. -- -- -- -- 80,584,079 River, KS Cost -- -- -- -- 80,584,079 Maint. Approp. 1,813,800 3,196,000 3,306,000 1,956,000 41,576,232 Cost 1,912,339 3,033,190 3,448,551 4/ 2,094,153 41,576,232 27-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 27-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep 30, 1998 22. Wilson Lake, New Work: Saline River, KS 25. Harry S. Truman Dam & Reservoir Osage River, MO 26. Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,507,600 1,518,460 2,900,000 2,350,806 8,027,000 8,039,973 3,545,000 4,063,067 1,385,000 1,382,000 1,301,000 1,380,235 1,341,516 1,346,829 713,442 -935 8,200,000 7,833,000 8,954,000 8,235,466 7,650,016 9,162,409 3,413,000 3,467,000 3,042,000 3,281,209 3,096,906 3,516,862 20,463,367 20,463,367 29,414,604 29,414,604 550,909,000 550,908,965 117,350,162 117,306,450 79,975,357 79,975,357 58,571,159 58,523,136 30. Mississippi River Main Stem Model Development Maint. Approp. Cost 1. Includes $8,665,595 cost of new work for previous project. 2. Includes $738,109 for maintenance of previous project. 3. Includes funds appropriated under FY 1993 Emergency Flood Supplemental Appropriation, 96 3/7 3123: Missouri River, Rulo, NE to Mouth, $40,000; and Milford Lake, KS, $40,000 4. Includes funds expended under FY 1993 Emergency Flood Supplemental Appropriation, 96 3/7 3123: Missouri River, Rulo, NE to Mouth, $1,119,854; Milford Lake, KS $45,526; and Tuttle Creek Lake, KS $53,087. 5. Excludes $35,296 non-Federal contribution not required for authorized Blue River Channel project (Blue River Channel Mobay Chemical 1984-1987). 6. Corps is building Brush Creek Expanded Project requested by sponsor, City of Kansas City. MO, with all costs of betterments and enhancements not required by Authorized Project 40,000 40,000 50,000 49,659 90,000 341 90,000 funded by sponsor. Excludes sponsor's contributions of $2,548,121 for Kansas City, MO, PED (FWKCM) 1987 through 1997; $2,159,888 for Park Features Design; $1,071,274 for Water Pollution Control during construction; and $1,729,155 for Public Works Department. 7. Excludes $118,805 non-Federal contribution not required for authorized Clinton Lake project (1973-1979). 8. Excludes cost of materials furnished Harlan County project without charge in the amount of $24,198. 9. Excludes cost of materials furnished Kanopolis Lake project without charge in the amount of $7,885. 10. Excludes $2,732,554 thru FY 1990 non-Federal contributions not required for authorized Little Blue Lakes project. 11. Corrected total. Excludes $42,149 interest during construction at Long Branch Lake project, and $500,000 work-in-kind. 27-14 KANSAS CITY, MO. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION in Text Mar 2, 1945 2. Nov 17, 1986 3. Oct 12,1996 Securing a navigable channel of 9-foot depth and a minimum width of 300 feet. MISSOURI RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE MITIGATION, MO, KS, IA & NE Project for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses Missouri River Bank Stabalization and Navigation Project, MO, KS, IA & //nE: April 24, 1984, Report of Chief of Engineers, authorized at estimated cost of $51,900,000. BLUE RIVER BASIN, KANSAS CITY, MO Project for flood control along the left bank of the Blue River from U.S. Highway 71 upstream for a distance of about 1 1/4 miles in Jackson County, MO, to the Bannister Federal Complex levee: Report of the Chiefof Engineers, dated Sep 5, 1996, at a total cost of $17,082,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $12,043,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,039,000. Act Project and Work Authorized Documents MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA, TO MOUTH (RULO, NE, TO MOUTH) Jul 25, 1912 Project adopted for securing a permanent navigable channel of 6-foot depth from Kansas City, MO to mouth. Aug 8, 1917 Fixed upstream limit of improvement at upper end of Quindaro Bend (274.8 miles from mouth) and provided for dredging. Mar 3, 1925 For a minimum width of 200 feet and depth of 6 feet, with a reasonable additional width around bends, mouth to upper end of Quindaro Bend, Kansas City, MO. Jan 12,1927 Appropriation of $12 million authorized for securing a 6-foot channel depth between Kansas City, MO, Quindaro Bend, and Sioux City, IA. Jul 3, 1930 Appropriation of $15 million additional authorized; additional allotments totaling $29,153,108 were made by Public Works Administration under provisions of National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933, and $9,669,791 allotted under provisions of Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935. Aug 30, 1935 Completion of improvement from mouth to Sioux City, IA. 27 - 15 TABLE 27-B See Section Date of 1. H. Doc. 1287, 61st Cong., (contains latest published map). P.L. 241-62 H. Doc. 463, 64th Cong., (contains latest published map). P.L. 585-68 H. Doc.1120, 60th Cong., P.L. 560-70 P.L. 67-73 H.R. 11781 P.L. 520-71 H. Doc. 238, 73d Cong., (contains latest published map). P.L. 409-73 H. Doc. 214, 76th Cong., (contains latest published map). P.L. 14-79 Title VI, Section 601(a), Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662. Title I, Section 101(a), Water Resources Development Act of 1996, P.L. 104-303 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 27-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act Project and Work Authorized BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO 4. Dec 31, 1970 Adopted plan for Blue River Basin and authorized $40,000,000 for initiation and partial accomplishment. BRUSH CREEK, KANSAS CITY, MO 5. Nov 17, 1986 Project for flood control on Brush Creek, a tributary of the Blue River, Kansas City, MO, authorized at estimated estimated total cost of $16,100,000. Nov 28, 1990 Modified to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct the project substantially in accordance with the Post Authorization Change Report, dated April 1989 (revised January 1990), at a total cost of $26,200,000. CLINTON LAKE, WAKARUSA RIVER, KS 6. Oct 23, 1962 The project for the Kansas River, KS,NE and CO is authorized at an estimated cost of $88,070,000. HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, REPUBLICAN, NE 7. Jun 28, 1938 Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Aug 18, 1941 Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure Dec 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. HILLSDALE LAKE, BIG BULL CREEK, KS 8. Sep 3, 1954 The comprehensive plan for the Missouri River Basin, approved by the Act of June 28, 1938, and as amended and supplemented is further modified to include the project for flood protection on the Kansas River and tributaries. It is further modified to include the project for flood protection on the Osage River and tributaries. KANOPOLIS LAKE, SMOKY HILL RIVER, KS 9. June 28, 1938 Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Aug 18, 1941 Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Documents H. Doc. 91-332, 91st Cong. Sec. 401(a), Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662 Water Resources Development Act of 1990, P.L. 101-640. 1962 Flood Control Act, H. Doc 578, 87th Cong. P.L. 87-874. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., P.L. 761. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; P.L. 77-228 H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 534. P.L. 780, 83rd Cong., H. Doc. 549, 81st Cong. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 7th Cong., P.L. 761. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; P.L. 77-228 27 - 16 KANSAS CITY. MO. DISTRICT TABLE 27-B See Section Date of AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Dec 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. and 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 534. LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO 10. Aug 13, 1968 Additional $38 million for prosecution of general compre- P.L. 90-483, H. Doc. 169, hensive plan for Missouri River Basin 90th Cong. LONG BRANCH LAKE, LITTLE CHARITON RIVER, MO 11. Oct 27, 1965 The project for flood protection on the Chariton and Little 1965 Flood Control Act Chariton Rivers and tributaries, IA and MO, is authorized P.L. 89-298, H. Doc. 238, at an estimated cost of $9,167,000. 89th Cong MELVERN LAKE, MARAIS DES CYGNES (OSAGE) RIVER, KS 12. Sep 3, 1954 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River H. Does. 642, 549 1/ Basin and authorized $217,710,000 for additional and 561, 81st Cong.; expenditure. 83rd Cong., P.L. 780 MILFORD LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, KS 13. Sep 3, 1954 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River H. Doc. 549 1/, 81st Cong.; Basin and authorized $217,710,000 for additional P.L. 780 expenditure. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IA, NE, KS AND MO 14. Aug 18,1941 Levees along both sides of river from Sioux City to H. Doc 821, 76th Cong. Kansas City. P.L. 77-228 Dec 22, 1944 Extended project from Kansas City to the mouth and H. Doc 475 and S. Docs. provided for increased protection. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. PERRY LAKE, DELAWARE RIVER, KS 15. Sep 3, 1954 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River H. Does. 642, 549 1/, and 561, Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. 81st Cong.; 83rd Cong., P.L. 780 16. Jun 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22,1944 Jul 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (KANSAS CITY DISTRICT) Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Additional expenditure of $150 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional expenditure of $250 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; P.L. 77-228 H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. 27 - 17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 27-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Sep 3, 1954 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River H. Docs. 642 and 549 1/ Basin and authorized $217,710,000 for additional 81st Cong.; 83rd Cong., expenditure. P.L. 780 May 2, 1956 Modified general comprehensive plan for Missouri River River Basin by deletion of construction of Red Willow Dam and Reservoir, NE, and addition of construction of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, KS. Jul 3, 1958 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River H. Doc. 409, 84th Cong. Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Jul 14, 1960 Additional expenditure of $207 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Dec 30, 1963 Additional expenditure of $80 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and modified plan to include bank protection or rectification works below Garrison Dam. Jun 18, 1965 Additional $116 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. May 12, 1967 Additional $20 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Aug 13, 1968 Additional $38 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Dec 24, 1970 Change comprehensive plan name to Pick-Sloan S. Doc. 91-1100, 91st Cong. Missouri River Basin Program. Dec 23, 1971 Additional $1G1,O00,00 for prosecution of general S. Doc. 92-222, 92nd Cong. comprehensive plan for Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program. Mar 7, 1974 Additional $72,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program. POMME DE TERRE LAKE, POMME DE TERRE RIVER, MO 17. Jun 28, 1938 Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial 75th Cong., P.L. 761. accomplishment. Dec 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. and 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 534. Sep 3, 1954 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River H. Doc. 642, 549 1/, and 561, Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. 81st Cong.; 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. POMONA LAKE, ONE HUNDRED TEN MILE CREEK, KS 18. Sep 3, 1954 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River H. Doc. 549 .1, 561, 81st Cong.; Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. 83rd Cong., P.L. 780 27 - 18 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION in Dec 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. WILSON LAKE, SALINE RIVER, KS 22. Dec 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Jul 14, 1960 2/ Additional expenditure of $207 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin HARRY S. TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OSAGE RIVER, MO 25. Sep 3, 1954 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. Oct 23, 1962 The Kaysinger Bluff Reservoir is hereby mosified in accordance with recommendations of the Chief of Engineers in H. Doc. 578, 87th Cong., at an estimated additional cost of $43,245,000; provided, that nothing in this Act shall be construed as authorizing the acquisition of additional lands for the establishment of a national wildlife refuge at the reservoir. STOCKTON LAKE, SAC RIVER, MO 26. Sep 3, 1954 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents RATHBUN LAKE, CHARITON RIVER, IA 19. Sep 3, 1954 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. SMITHVILLE LAKE, LITTLE PLATTE RIVER, MO 20. Oct 27, 1965 The project for flood protection on the Platte River and tributaries, MO and IA, is authorized at an estimated cost of $26,889,000. TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, BIG BLUE RIVER, KS 21. Jun 28, 1938 Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Aug 18, 1941 Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. 1/ Contains latest published of Missouri River 2/ Report of Chief of Engineers on justification of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, submitted in compliance with Public Law 505, 84th Congress, published as Senate Document 96, 86th Congress, was approved July 14, 1960 (Public Law 645). 27 - 19 TABLE 27-B See Section Date of I H. Doc. 561, 81st Cong., 83rd Cong., P.L. 780 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298 (H. Doc. 262, 89th Cong.) Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., P.L. 761. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; P.L. 77-228 H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 & 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 645 H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 & 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 534 S. Doc. 96, 86th Cong., P.L. 645 H. Doc. 549 1/, 81st Cong.; 83rd Cong., P.L. 780 1962 Flood Control Act, H. Doc. 578, 87th Cong., P.L. 87-874 H. Doc. 549 1/, 81st Cong.; 83rd Cong., P.L. 780 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 27-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1998 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Fort Leavenworth Bridge removal Complete 1965 270,393 -- Gasconade River, MO 1/2/ Complete 1931 139,003 85,077 1/ Improvement, adequate for existing needs. Project for maintenance only. Curtailment of project in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong. 2/ Inactive portion of project deauthorized Jan 1, 1990 in accordance with Section 1001(b)(l) of Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). 27 - 20 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 27-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Abilene, KS Atchison, KS Barnard, KS 1/ Bartley, NE Bedford, East Fork, 102 River, IA 1/ Big Blue River, Seward, NE 1/ Big Stranger Creek, KS 1/ Blue River Basin, Overland Park, KS Indian Creek Channel Modification 1/ Braymer Lake, Shoal Creek, MO 31 Brookfield Lake, Yellow Creek, MO 31 Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, MO (1965 Act) /41 Chariton River, MO (1944 Act) East Muddy Creek, MO 31 Elk Creek, Clyde, KS 1/ Fairbury, Little Blue River, NE Fort Scott Lake, Marmaton River, KS Frankfort, Black Vermillion River, KS Gypsum, Gypsum Creek, KS if Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, MO (Downstream Fish and Wildlife Mitigation) Indianola, NE Kansas City, Kansas River, KS (62 Mod) Kansas Citys on MO and KS Rivers, MO and KS Lawrence, Kansas River, KS Little Blue River Channel Improvement, Little Blue River, MO Lower Grand River, MO 3/ Manhattan, Kansas River, KS Mercer Lake, Weldon River, MO 3/ Missouri River at New Haven, MO (Sec 212, 1950 Act) Osawatomie, Pottawatomie Creek, KS Ottawa, Osage, (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, MO 312/ Perry Lake Area (Road Improvements), KS Platte River, MO, Channel Improvement Rathbun Lake Fish Hatchery Salina, Smoky Hill River, KS Seward, NE 1/ Smithville Channel, Little Platte River, MO Stonehouse Creek, Jefferson Co., KS 1/ Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Inactive Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed 1961 1973 1953 1974 1994 1966 1976 1977 1973 1966 1984 1973 1976 1966 1984 1950 1984 1980 1985 1989 1966 1967 1976 1973 1966 1976 1982 1973 1975 1967 1973 1972 1,099,350 4,099,590 127,860 118,269 652,414 126,887 337,131 269,288 2/ 451,400 692,706 4/ 8,052,990 -- 989,015 726,966 757,500 1,271,025 2,782,793 .1 --. 67,275 25,010,500 / 42,434,197 21 8,773,488 $/ 25,530,083 2,488,585 432,245 139,883 2,036,624 4,462,661 5,315,168 222,193 700,000 3,878,668 126,887 6,896 246,995 27-21 ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 27-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Topeka, Kansas River, KS Completed 1974 21,174,593 -- Trenton Lake, Thompson River, MO 3/ Inactive 1966 -- -- Trimble Wildlife Area, Smithville Lake, MO Completed 1990 1,570,000 -- Upper Grand River, MO 31 Inactive 1966 -- -- 1/ Authorized by the Chief of Engineers under Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. 2/ Required non-Federal contributions $129,680. 3/ Grand River Basin reconnaissance study (authorized by resolution of the Committee on Public Works and Transportation, U.S. House of Representatives on July 3, 1987) reviewed and updated costs for these projects authorized in the Flood Control Act of 1965, and found no economically feasible plan. 5/ Includes $130,841 non-Federal contributions. 6/ Inactive units Kansas Avenue Bridge and Approach, and Lower Argentine Units were deauthorized Jult 9, 1995 in accordance with Section 1001(b)(2) of WRDA of 1986, P.L. 99- 662. Construction cost above includes $67,500 for deauthorized Bridge and Approach Unit; does not include $1,181,000 non- Federal Contributions. / Includes $619,787 non-Federal contributions for work desired by local interests, but not required under the project. The project as a whole is complete except for Turkey Creek facilities in Central Industrial District Unit. 4/ Inactive units Little Chariton River (East and Mid $/ Includes $153,377 non-Federal contributions. Fork) and Mussell Fork were deauthorized Jan 1,199 2/ Patonsburg Lake Highway Relocation and town relocation by Section 1001(b)(1) of the Water Resources portions of the project were deauthorized Jan 1,1990 in Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662. Constructio accordance with Section 1001 (b)(1) of the Water Resources cost includes $481,106 cost of completed Shoal Cree Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662. Unit and $211,600 cost of deauthorized Little Chariton River and Mussell Fork units. 27- 22 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 27-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Date Project Report For Date and Authority Expended Expended Deauthorized Arlington Lake, MO 1948 Beatrice, Big Blue River, NE 1965 Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, MO (1965 Act)-- 1977 Inactive Units Little Chariton River (East and Middle Fork) and Mussell Fork Units only 1/ Dry Fork and East Fork 1974 Lakes, Fishing River, MO Garnett Lake, Pottawatomie 1973 Creek, KS Gasconade River Navigation, 1931 MO Grove Lake, Soldier Creek, K 1977 Hackleman Corners Lake, -- Cedar Creek, MO Hays, Big Creek, KS ./ 1974 Indian Lake, Blue River, KS 1976 Kansas City, Kansas River, 1984 KS (62) Mod)--Inactive Units Kansas Avenue Bridge Approach, and Lower Argentine Units Only Kansas River Navigation 1980 Flood Control Act approved June 28, 1938, as modified by Flood Control Act approved August 18, 1941, and expanded by Flood Control Act approved December 22, 1944 Flood Control Act appr September 3, 1954 1965 Flood Control Act P.L. 89-298 (H. Doc. 238, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) 1965 Flood Control Act P.L. 89-298 (H. Doc. 281, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) Flood Control Act approved September 3, 1954 Curtailment of project in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong. 1928 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 122, 87th Cong. 2d sess.) Authorized by Flood Control Act approved September 3, 1954 Flood Control Act of 1965 approved October 27, 1965 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 332 91st Cong., 2d sess.) 1962 Flood Control Act, S. Doc. 122, 87th Cong., P.L. 87-874 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298, Sec. 201 $8,651 -- Aug 5, 1977 16,317 -- May 6, 1981 211,600 -- Jan 1, 1990 51,989 -- Jan 1, 1990 71,466 -- Nov 17, 1986 2/ -- Jan 1, 1990 1,754,019 -- Nov 17, 1986 -- -- Aug 5, 1977 499,200 -- Jan 18, 1978 127,297 -- Nov 17, 1986 67,500 4/ -- Jul 9, 1995 259,900 -- Nov 17, 1986 27 - 23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 27-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Date Project Report For Date and Authority Expended Expended Deauthorized Marysville, KS Melvern Lake and Pomona Lake (Road Improvements) KS (1974 Act) Merriam, Turkey Creek, KS 15 Mill Lake, Blue River, MO 1l Missouri River Levee System, IA, KS, MO, and NE Deauthorized by Sec. 1002 Water Resources Development Act of 1968, P.L. 99-662, Section 1002: Units R402; R393-395; and R414 Deauthorized in accordance with WRDA Section 1001(b)(1 Units L36; R42; L51; R55-59-6 L68-92; R70; L78; R87;L94; L99; L103; R104; R107; R112; L117; L121; L124; L129; L134 L137-139; L145; R150; L154; L157; R161; L164; R169; L175 R179-184; L191-196; L205; L217; R226; R240; R251; L256 R259; L263-270 5/; R272; R284; R302; R336; L353; L357 R361; L362; L392; L419-426; L435; R512-513, Section III Flood Control Act of September 3, 1954 Water Resources Development Act of 1974, Section 17 Flood Control Act approved September 3, 1954 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 332, 91st Cong., 2d sess.) -- Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, P.L. 228, 77th Cong. -- Flood Control Act of August 18, ): 1941, P.L. 228, 77th Cong. 133,682 39,708 57,500 1,631,700 -- Jan 1967 -- Jan 1, 1990 -- Nov 27, 1973 -- Nov 17, 1986 -- Nov 17, 1986 -- Jan 1, 1990 27- 24 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 27-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Date Project Report For Date and Authority Expended Expended Deauthorized Onaga Lake, Vermillion Creek, KS Osage River Navigation, MO, 1952 lock and dam Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, MO 2/ 1-35 Highway Relocation Town Relocation Pioneer Lake, KS Pomme de Terre Lake (Power Addition), MO Richland Lake, MO 1976 1976 1952 1954 1974 1948 Flood Control Act of 1962, October 23, 1962 (P.L. 87-874) Original lock and dam authorized Mar 3, 1899; improvement authorized in 1928; placed in standby status Jul 1952 and operation & maintenance discontinued. 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298 (H. Doc. 241, 89th Cong., 1st sess) Flood Control Act approved June 28, 1938, as modified by Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, and expanded by Flood Control Act approved December 22, 1944 Flood Control Act of 1954 (H. Doc. 549, 81st Cong., 2d sess.) Flood Control Act approved June 28, 1938, as modified by Flood Control Act approved August 18, 1941, and expanded by Flood Control Act approved December 2, 1944 2,178,261 658,076 6/ 393,623 91,929 95,692 8,548 -- Nov 17, 1986 -- Jan 1, 1990 -- Jan 1, 1990 -- Jan 1, 1990 -- Aug 5, 1977 -- Nov 17, 1986 -- Aug 5, 1977 27 - 25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 27-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Date Project Report For Date and Authority Expended Expended Deauthorized Tomahawk Lake, 1976 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 332, 77,189 -- Nov 17, 1986 Blue River, KS 91st Cong., 2d sess.) Tuttle Creek Lake, KS (Road 1977 Sec. 18 of Water Resources 3,000 -- Nov 17, 1986 Improvement--1974 Mod.) Development Act of 1974 Tuttle Creek Lake, KS -- Water Resources Development Act of -- -- Jan 1, 1990 Road and Bridge (1976 1976, Section 189, P.L. 94-587 Act) Wolf-Coffee Lake, Blue River 1976 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 332, 1,095,020 -- Nov 17, 1986 KS 91st Cong., 2d sess.) 1/ For completed Shoal Creek unit of Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, MO, see Table 27-E. 2/ For completed project see Table 27-C. Deauthorized under Sec. 1001(b)(1) WRDA of 1986, P.L. 99-662. 3/ Hays, Lincoln Draw, KS, Section 205 feasibility study terminated in March 1991 due to lack of identifiable project that would meet dam safety concerns. 4/ For completed Argentine, Amourdale, and Central Industrial Units of project, see Table 27-E. 5/ Incorrectly shown as R263-270 in the deauthorization act. 6/ Operation and maintenance costs $850,495. Deauthorized under Sec. 1001(b)(1) of WRDA, P.L. 99-662. 2 Pattonsburg Lake portion of project is inactive. See Table 27-E. 27 -26 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 27-H MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM (See Section 14 of Text) Miles of Unit Levee Status R512-513 Richardson Co. D.D. No. 7 R500 Iowa Point D. D. No. 4 Kimsey Holly Creek L497 Forest City L. D. L488 Holt Co. D. D. No. 7 R482 Burr Oak D. D. No. 3 L476 Amazonia L. D. R460-471 Elwood-Gladden L. D. L455 S. St. Joseph L. D. L443-448 Halls L. D. R440 Atchison & Doniphan Co. D. D. L408 Farley-Beverly D. D. L400 Waldron L. D. L385 Riverside-Quindaro D. D. R351 Atherton L. D. L330-345 Orrick L. D. L319-325 Henrietta-Crooked River D. D. L246 Brunswick-Dalton D. D. L142 L15 North County L. D. Remaining units 19.1 4.1 4.4 16.0 11.5 8.2 10.8 13.8 15.6 17.3 10.7 12.2 7.6 6.5 15.9 43.4 35.0 20.0 6.0 40.0 Complete--1958 Complete-- 1954 Complete-- 1970 Complete-- 1962 Complete--1955 Complete-- 1954 Complete-- 1956 Complete-- 1968 Complete-- 1967 Complete-- 1957 Complete--1959 Complete (Levee raise modification)--1972 Complete-- 1957 Planning underway Complete-- 1966 Inactive Inactive Complete-- 1983 Active Active Detailed planning not initiated 27 -27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 27-I KANSAS CITY DISTRICT PROJECTS INCLUDED IN PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (See Section 16 of Text) Federal Non-Federal Non-Federal Project Status Cost Cost Reimbursable Abilene, Smoky Hill River, KS Bartley, Republican River, NE Fort Scott Lake, Marmaton River, KS Garnett Lake, Pottawatomie Creek, KS Harlan County Lake, Republican River, NE Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, KS Indianola, Republican River, NE Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS Lawrence, Kansas River, KS Manhattan, Kansas River, KS Melvern Lake, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS Melvern Lake and Pomona Lake (Road Improvement), KS (1974 Authorization) Milford Lake, Republican River, KS Missouri River Levee System, Rulo to the Mouth $/ Osawatomie, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS Ottawa, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, MO Pomona Lake, Osage River Basin, KS Salina, Smoky Hill River, KS Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO Topeka, Kansas River, KS Tuttle Creek Lake, Big Blue River, KS Tuttle Creek Lake, KS--Road and Bridge (1976 Act) Tuttle Creek Lake (Road Improvement), KS (1974 Modification) Wilson Lake, Saline River, KS C C I D C C C C C C C C D C A C C C C C C C C C D D C $1,099,350 118,269 71,186,000 71,466 48,129,549 550,908,965 64,161,400 67,275 12,577,227 8,620,111 2,488,585 37,436,530 49,566,492 93,553,000 2,036,624 4,462,661 49,095,918 17,365,453 14,003,238 3,878,668 79,975,357 21,174,593 80,584,079 3,000 20,463,367 $287,000 9,500 19,314,000 -- 7,592 2,130,000 265,000 35,265,000 348,300 876,000 1,960,000 10,383,492 $44,800,000 , 138,385,000 / 21,145,338 5/ 7,131,834 2/ 12,162,134 5./ 8,551,805 5. 862,923 5.! 24,206,593 2. 2,333,916 ./ 1/ Status: A = Active; C = Completed; D = Deauthoriz I = Inactive. 2/ Actual appropriations for completed and deauthorize projects; estimated appropriation requirements for active and inactive projects. 3/ Estimated cost during construction. 4/ Future reimbursement of initial Federal cost. 5./ Estimated reimbursement costs allocated to water supply. ./ Estimated reimbursement costs allocated to power. 27 In accordance with the Memorandum of Understandin between the State of Kansas and the Dept. of the Army dated 1985, payment in full of $7,131,834 for 50,000 acrefeet of water supply was made in March 1995. 3/ Active portion of project. Currently estimated cost (1997): Deferred portion of project--$46,753,000 Federal and $4,336,000 non-Federal; Inactive portion of project-- $104,791,000 Federal and $11,296,000 non-Federal. Actual cost of deauthorized units (1990) is $1,689,200 Federal. 2/ Includes $22,116,864 estimated reimbursement costs allocated to power, and $2,089,729 estimated reimbursement costs allocated to water supply. 27 - 28 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 27-J INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 24 of text) Project Month Inspected Missouri River Main Stem R482, R500, R440 and Atchison, KS Apr-98 Birmingham (KCMO) and Fairfax Jersey Creek (KCK), L408, L400, R471-460 May-98 R351 I, R351 II North Kansas City (Lower Section), GSA Complex (KCMO), L448-443 Jun-98 KCMO Units--CID (MO), East Bottoms, NKC-Airport, Blue River Channel, Brush Creek L455 Jul-98 L246, Lower Chariton River Unit, New Haven Aug-98 L476, L488 Sep-98 Kimsey Holley Creek, R512-513 Oct-98 Kansas River North Topeka, Soldier Creek, Auburndale, South Topeka, Waterworks Unit, Oaklan Apr-98 Manhattan, KS May-98 Ft Riley Jun-98 Lawrence, KS Sep-98 Kaw Valley--Argentine, Armourdale, Lower Fairfax, CID (KS) Oct-98 Osage River (MO) Marais des Cvgnes (KS) Ottawa, KS Jun-98 Osawatomie, KS Jun-98 Smokey Hill. Saline. Solomon Rivers & Tributaries (KS) Abilene, KS, Barnard, KS Jun-98 Salina, KS Sep-98 Gypsum, KS Oct-98 Republican River Clyde, KS Apr-98 Indianola, NE Nov-98 Big and Little Blue Rivers (KS & NE) Frankfort, KS Apr-98 Fairbury, NE, Seward, NE Sep-98 Little Blue River (MO) Little Blue River Channel, Jackson County, MO Aug-98 Lake City AAP, MO Aug-98 Miscellaneous Stonehouse Creek--Williamstown, KS, Bedford Project--Bedford, IA Jul-98 Shoal Creek--Livonid, MO, Macon-Adair Creek--Kirksville, MO Aug-98 27 - 29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 27-K WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITIES (See Section 27 of Text) Study Status 1/ FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES Continuing Authorities Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, June 30, 1948, as Amended Section 205 Coordination Account Mitchell and Pearson Creeks, Waynesville, MO F TOTAL FOR COORDINATION AND ONE ACTIVE PROJECT: TOTAL ALL SECTION 205 ACTIVITIES Emergency Streambank Protection--Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act Public Law 526, 79th Congress, July 24, 1946, as Amended Section 14 Coordination Account Delaware River Water Intake, Kickapoo Reservation, KS East Fork Big Creek, Bethany, MO GrandvRiver, Route A Bridge, MO Grand River, Chariton County, MO, Salt Creek Bridge Hinkson Creek, Columbia Sewermain, MO Kansas River, Eudora Bend Bridge, KS Marmaton River, Vernon County, MO Muddy Creek, Grundy County, MO One hundred Two River, Nodaway County, MO, Hopkins Bridge One hundred Two River,Pickering, MO, Nodaway County Bridge Osage River, City of Lake Ozark, MO, Sewermain West Creek, Topeka, KS West Fork, Grand River, Route H Bridge, Gentry County, MO West Fork, Grand River, Route W Roadway C D C O D O O O D D TOTAL FOR COORDINATION AND 14 ACTIVE PROJECTS TOTAL ALL SECTION 14 PROJECTS 27- 30 Fiscal Year Cost $11,353 9,545 $20,898 $20,898 $12,615 8,262 21,712 12,584 111,682 15,176 4,284 149,703 23,999 83 36 -1,818 46,975 47,497 12,015 $464,805 $464,805 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment Section 1135, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 662, 99th Congress, November 17, 1986 Coordination Account Funds Initial Appraisals, General Blue Springs Lake Habitat, MO Milford Lake Habitat Restoration, KS Rathbun Lake Habitat Restoration, IA TOTAL ACTIVE SECTION 1135 TOTAL ALL SECTION 1135 ACTIVITIES I D F P $9,063 19,717 57,434 59,977 73,706 $219,897 $219,897 Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Section 206, Public Law 104-303 Coordination Account Funds Preliminary Restoration Funds TOTAL SECTION 206 ACTIVITIES $4,656 19,689 $24,345 1/ Status: I = Initial; D = Planning and Design Analysis; F = Feasibility; P = P&S; C = Construction; O =Operational Emergency Response Activities (See Section 28 of Text) Emergency Flood Control Activities--Repair, Flood Fighting, and Rescue Work-- Public Law 99, 84th Congress and Antecedent Legislation Approp 96X3125 FY 98 Exnenditure Emergency Supplemental Approp 96 3/7 3125 FY9 8 Expnenditure FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES Disaster Prepardness Program--100 Corps Statutory Activities Activities in Support of Others Facilities Inspections Total Disaster Preparedness Program 27 - 31 $225,423 38,863 75,809 62,007 $402,102 . . . . . .. _-- ... . .. . . . . . . V. .. _-- ... . .. . l .. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Emergency Operations--200 Flood Fight and Rescue Operations--210 Acquision of Supplies & Equip Total Emergency Operations Rehabilitation--300 Federal Flood Control Works Non-Federal Flood Control Works Field Investigation Inspections Total Rehabilitation FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES TOTAL FEDERAL NON-REIMBURSEABLE ACTIVITIES SPONSOR'S CONTRIBUTED FUNDS Maintenance--300 Non-Federal Flood Control Works--320 $3,016,597 $38,503 Rivers and Harbors Contributed Funds Approp 96X8862 Expenditures $0 TOTAL ALL EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACTIVITIES EXPENDITURES $3,055,100 27- 32 $278,856 4,947 $283,803 $1,633,942 624,164 19,396 53,190 $38,503 $2,330,692 $38,503 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 27-L ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Section 29 of Text) Federal Cost Total By Item and PWI Number FY 98 Category SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention Studies (120) Turkey Creek Basin, KS & MO--012381 Swope Park Industrial Area, Kansas City, MO--012821 Subtotal Review of Authorized Projects (160) MRLS, Units L455 and R460-471 (013267) Topeka, KS--013200 Kansas City, MO & KS--013268 Subtotal Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations--017250 Interagency Water Resources Development--014713 North American Waterfowl Mgmt--053904 Subtotal Coordination with Other Agencies and Non-Federal Interests (180) Coop with Other Water Resources Agencies (181)--053907 Planning Assistance to States (186) Subtotal TOTAL SURVEYS (Category 100) COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Management Service Unit--082030 Technical Services--082040 Quick Responses--082045 Flood Plains Management Study--082500 Special Studies Mo River Flood Plain Eval, MO--083608 Eudora, KS--083613 Missouri SEM MRCS--083614 Liberty, MO--083070 Subtotal 27- 33 $400 170,771 $171,171 $51,357 230,721 398,251 $680,329 $70,000 18,951 2,996 $91,947 $15,000 100,000 $115,000 $1,058,447 $30,000 39,765 3,300 494 68,143 10,500 18,000 5,253 $175,455 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Hydrologic Studies (260) General Hydrology Studies--053820 $20,137 TOTAL COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA $195,592 (Category 200) PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Flood Control Projects (Project Not Fully Authorized) (Category 450) Turkey Creek Basin, KS & MO--012381 $24,328 Flood Control Projects (Fully Authorized Project) (Category 600) Blue River Basin, Kansas City, MO--012563 537,624 TOTAL PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN $561,952 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $1,815,991 27 - 34 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT REGULATORY PROGRAM (See Section 33 of Text) TABLE 27-M Item and PWI Number PERMIT EVALUATION (100) REG--Permit Evaluation--008204 ENFORCEMENT (200) REG--Enforcement--008205 GRAND TOTAL REGULATORY PROGRAM 27-35 Federal cost FY 98 $1,881,768 623,289 $2,505,057 PORTLAND, OR DISTRICT * The territorial limits of the Portland District include the Pacific coastal drainage area of the State of Oregon, the portions of the States of Oregon and Washington which lie within the Columbia River watershed downstream of the Umatilla Bridge below McNary Dam, and south central Oregon west of the Malheur River and the Steens Mountains, but not including that part which drains into the Klamath Lake and River. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Bonneville Navigation Lock, Bonneville Dam, OR and WA ..................................... 28-2 2. Chetco River, OR ..................................... 28-2 3. Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR ...................... 28-2 4. Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA .................... 28-3 5. Columbia River between Chinook, WA and Head of Sand Island ....................................... 28-4 6. Columbia River at the Mouth, OR and WA ........... 28-4 7. Columbia River between Vancouver, WA and The Dalles, OR .................................... 28-4 8. Columbia River, Seafarers Memorial Hammond, OR ..................................... 28-5 9. Coos Bay, OR ..................................... 28-5 10. Coquille River, OR ............................................ 28-6 11. Depoe Bay, OR ..................................... 28-6 12. Port Orford, OR ..................................... 28-7 13. Project Condition Surveys ................................. 28-7 14. Rogue River Harbor at Gold Beach, OR ............. 28-7 15. Siuslaw River, OR .................................... 28-7 16. Skipanon Channel, OR ...................................... 28-8 17. Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR .............................. 28-8 18. Umpqua River, OR .................................... 28-9 19. Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR ............. 28-9 20. Yaquina Bay and Harbor, OR ............................ 28-9 21. Yaquina River, OR .......................................... 28-10 Flood Control 22. Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR ......... 28-10 23. Blue River Lake, OR ....................................... 28-11 24. Cottage Grove Lake, OR ................................. 28-11 25. Dorena Lake, OR ..................................... 28-11 26. Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR ............ 28-12 27. Fall Creek Lake, OR ....................................... 28-12 28. Fern Ridge Lake, OR ..................................... 28-13 29. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects. 28-13 30. Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection, OR and WA. ..................................... 28-13 31. Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, WA ............ 28-14 32. Scappoose Drainage District, OR .................... 28-14 33. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations . 28-14 34. Willamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR ..... 28-15 35. Willow Creek Lake, Heppner, OR ................... 28-15 Page Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 36. Bonneville Lock and Dam Lake Bonneville, OR and WA ......................... 28-15 37. Columbia River Fish Mitigation, OR and W A ....................................................... 28-16 38. Columbia River Treaty Fishing Sites, O R and W A ........................................................ 28-17 39. Cougar Lake, OR ..................................... 28-17 40. Detroit Lake - Big Cliff, OR ......................... 28-18 41. Green Peter-Foster Lakes, OR ......................... 28-18 42. Hills Creek Lake, OR ...................................... 28-19 43. John Day Lock and Dam- Lake Umatilla, OR and WA ............................. 28-19 44. Lookout Point-Dexter Lakes, OR .................... 28-19 45. Lost Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR........... 28-20 46. The Dalles Lock and Dam Lake Celilo, WA and OR ................................. 28-21 Work Under Special Authorities 47. Projects Not Specifically Authorized ............... 28-21 48. Emergency Response Activities ....................... 28-23 General Investigations 49. Surveys ..................................... 28-23 50. Collection and Study of Basic Data ................. 28-24 51. Preconstruction Engineering and Design ........... 28-24 Tables Table 28-A Cost & Financial Statement ................ 28-25 Table 28-B Authorizing Legislation ...................... 28-32 Table 28-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..................................... 28-38 Table 28-D Not Applicable Table 28-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................................... 28-39 Table 28-F Other Authorized Multiple Purpose Projects, Including Power ................... 28-41 Table 28-G Deauthorized Projects ........................ 28-41 Table 28-H Columbia and Lower Willamette River Below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR ...................................... 28-42 Table 28-I Project Condition Surveys .................. 28-42 28-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Page Table 28-J Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR, Principal Features of Existing Canal and Locks .......................................... 28-42 Table 28-K Flood Control Reservoir Operations ...... 28-43 Table 28-L Work Under Special Authorities, Projects Not Specifically Authorized ............... 28-44 Page Table 28-M Work Under Special Authorities, Emergency Response Activities .......... 28-45 Table 28-N Principal Data Concerning Navigation Lock, Spillway Dam, and Powerplant.... 28-46 Navigation 1. BONNEVILLE NAVIGATION LOCK, BONNEVILLE DAM, ORAND WA Location. On Columbia River 40 miles east of Portland, OR about 146 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. The existing lock chamber is 76 feet wide and 500 feet long with 24.2 feet depth of water over the sill. Construction of a new navigation lock just south of the existing lock was authorized in the FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act, Public Law 99-88, August 15, 1985. Inland Waterways Trust Fund will fund 50 percent of the project cost in accordance with the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986. The new lock chamber is 86 feet wide and 675 feet long with 19 feet depth of water over the sill. Estimated cost for construction of the new navigation lock is $348,100,000. Construction of the lock is completed. The lock opened to shipping on March 26, 1993. Restoration of the grounds and historic buildings is complete. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Continued real estate activities to obtain title to project lands. 2. CHETCO RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Siskiyou Mountains of Coast Range at an elevation of 4,000 feet, flows for about 51 miles in a circuitous route, and empties into Pacific Ocean at Brookings, OR, 300 miles south of entrance to Columbia River and 345 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Charts 18600 and 18203.) Existing project. Provides for two jetties at the mouth of the river. Modification of 1965 authorized an entrance channel 120 feet wide by 14 feet deep; a barge turning basin about 250 feet wide, 650 feet long, and 14 feet deep; and a small boat access channel 100 feet wide by 12 feet deep. Also authorized was a 450-foot extension of north jetty with an increase in elevation of existing portion and a protective dike about 1,800 feet long with atop elevation of 18 feet. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 6.9 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. Construction ofjetties was completed December 1957. Removal of rock pinnacles and an abandoned bridge structure was accomplished in June 1959. Under authorized modification of October 1965, two contracts were completed. Construction of entrance channel and extension of north jetty was completed in July 1969. Construction of a protective dike, turning basin and small boat access channel was completed in March 1970. The authorization was modified by WRDA 92 to "direct the Secretary of the Army to assume maintenance of the approximately 200-foot long access channel to the south commercial boat basin consistent with authorized project depths". This channel will be maintained in lieu of the small boat access channel. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Port of Brookings has developed two large boat basins, one for commercial fishing boats and the other for sport boats, and a public boat launching ramp. There are four fish receiving docks and a sea-going barge dock for lumber loading and storage. There is also a privately owned marina and a Coast Guard Station. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 38,548 cubic yards of material was removed by the US hopper dredge Yaquina. The sand bypasser Sandwick worked six days. 3. COLUMBIAAND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVERS BELOW VANCOUVER, WA, AND PORTLAND, OR Location. The Columbia River rises in British Columbia, through which it flows for 425 miles. It enters the United States in northeastern Washington, and empties into the Pacific Ocean 645 miles north of San Francisco Bay and 160 miles south of Strait of Juan DeFuca. Total length of river is 1,210 miles. (See NOAA Charts 18520, 18521, 18522, 18523, 18524, 18526, and 18531; also Geological Survey Map of Washington.) Willamette River rises in Cascade Range in western Oregon, flows northerly, and empties into Columbia River about 100 miles from the sea. Its length from source of Middle Fork is about 294 miles. Project embraces 103.5 miles of Columbia River below Vancouver, WA, and 14.6 miles of Willamette River below Portland, OR. (See NOAA Chart 18526 and Geological Survey Map, State of Oregon.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide from River Mile 106.5 to 105.5, the distance between existing highway and railroad bridges; a channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Vancouver, WA, River Mile 105.5 to mouth of Columbia River, River Mile 3; a turning basin at Vancouver, WA, 40 feet deep, 800 feet wide, and about 5,000 feet long; a turning basin at Longview, WA, 40 feet deep, average width of 1,200 feet, and about 6,000 feet long; and a channel 40 feet deep in the Willamette River with varying widths of 600 to 1,900 feet from the mouth (River Mile 0) to Broadway Bridge (River Mile 11.6) which encompasses Portland Harbor area, subject to provisions that channel from mouth ofWillamette River to turning basin at Vancouver, WA, be limited to 500 feet in width until need for additional width 28-2 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT is demonstrated by developed traffic. Existing project also provides for auxiliary channels 10 feet deep and 300 feet wide near Cathlamet, WA; 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide in St. Helens, (Oregon); and 30 feet deep and 500 feet wide connecting upper end of St. Helens Channel with main ship channel of Columbia; 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide along frontage of town of Rainier, OR, extended to its upper and lower ends to deep water in Columbia River, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide from this depth in Columbia River through old mouth of Cowlitz River to a point about 3,000 feet upstream from present terminus of harbor line; a channel from Longview Port dock downstream along pierhead line and past Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. plant at Longview to a connection with main ship channel below Mount Coffin, the downstream 2,400 feet of this channel to be 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide and remainder to be 28 feet deep and 250 feet wide; construction of a small boat mooring basin at Astoria, OR, to include a sheet pile, sand-filled breakwater about 2,400 feet long with a 30- foot roadway along its full length, and steel pile shore wings totaling about 1,460 feet long and for stone-and-pile dikes and revetments. Plane of reference in estuary from mouth of Harrington Point is mean lower low water; thence to Portland and Vancouver, adopted low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth of Columbia is about 8 feet, and at Portland and Vancouver, about 3 feet at low stage of rivers. Extreme tidal ranges are about 13 and 3 feet, respectively. Annual freshets have little effect on stage of tide at mouth of Columbia; at Portland and Vancouver, they average about 12 feet, while highest know reached a stage of 33 feet above water at Portland. Work on the 40-foot channel in Columbia River from Portland, OR, and Vancouver, WA, to the sea was completed in 1976. Auxiliary channel in vicinity of Longview was completed in 1949, and improvement of mouth of Cowlitz River and small boat mooring basin at Astoria were completed in 1950. Project depths are maintained all year except for the period immediately following the annual freshet in May-June when shoaling occurs at several locations. Timing of vessel movement with tidal fluctuations permit maximum draft conditions. In Columbia and Willamette Rivers between mouth and Broadway Bridge at Portland a depth of 40 feet at low tide and 42 feet at high tide is practicable all year. In Columbia River between mouth of Willamette river and Vancouver, WA, depths of 40 and 42 feet at low and high tide, respectively, are practicable all year. (For details relating to previous project, see pages 1995 and 1998 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1746 of Annual Report for 1938.) A feasibility study for deepening the Columbia and Lower Willamette navigation channel is being conducted in cooperation with the Association of Lower Columbia River Ports. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At Portland, OR, there are six Port of Portland terminals consisting of 43 berths equipped to handle general cargo, bulk cargo, lumber, automobiles, lift-on-lift-off and roll-on-roll-off containers, and breakbulk vessels. The Port of Portland owns and operates a major ship repair yard, which includes the west coast's largest, and the world's third largest, floating dry dock. Also available in the harbor area are privately operated facilities for receiving, storing and outloading petroleum, wood chips, grain, logs, sand and gravel, cement, and steel products. AtAstoria, OR, there is a terminal with facilities for receiving and handling all types of general cargo. At Vancouver, WA, there are municipal facilities capable of berthing five ships simultaneously. Each berth is completely outfitted with mechanical and lift facilities for receiving and handling all types of cargo. The port has a low dock to handle roll-on-roll-off and side-port discharging vessels. The grain terminal has a storage capacity of 4,500,000 bushels. Port of Longview has a public terminal on Columbia River and a privately owned grain elevator with a capacity of 6,900,000 bushels. This port also has a heavy lift facility, with a capacity of 600 tons. Port of Kalama has two berthing areas, one port owned and one private. At otner locations on Columbia River between Portland and Columbia River entrance there are sufficient private facilities to accommodate river vessels and fishing craft. These facilities, with planned extensions, are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details, see Port Series Nos. 33 and 34, Corps of Engineers, published in 1974 and 1975 respectively.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 6.6 million cubic yards of material was removed. The U.S. hopper dredge Essayons removed 2.4 million cubic yards, the U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 6,700 cubic yards, the pipeline dredge Oregon removed about 4 million cubic yards, and the contract hopper dredge Newport removed 155,000 cubic yards. The sand bypasser Sandwick worked 20 days in the Cowlitz Old Mouth and Wahkiakum Ferry Channels. A supply contract for sheetpile was issued in September 1998 to begin repair of the East Astoria Boat Basin breakwater. 4. COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA Location. Baker Bay is a shallow body of water about 15 square miles in extent on the north side of Columbia River near its mouth. The bay is separated from the river by Sand Island, a low-lying sand bar only a few feet above high tide level. (See NOAA Chart 18521.) Existing project. A mooring basin 10 and 12 feet deep, about 20 acres in extent with protecting breakwaters; and a west channel 16 feet deep and 200 feet wide for the first 2,000 feet, then 16 feet deep and 150 feet wide to the boat basin; a channel east of Sand Island to Port of Ilwaco, a distance of about 4 miles. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, and extreme about 13 feet. Channel extending through easterly passage of Sand Island was completed in 1934. This portion of authorized project is not passable and is not maintained at the present time. Dredging west channel to 8 feet was accomplished September 1948. Deepening west channel to 10 feet, and boat basin and breakwater construction at lwaco, WA, was finished December 28-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 1957, and again, deepening of the west channel to 16 feet completed in August 1985 under Section 107, finished the project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Wharves, floats, ramps, and berths, for fishing craft, barges and tow-boats. Small-boat basin and protecting breakwater provides moorings for numerous fishing and recreational craft all year. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Performed condition surveys. 5. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK, WA, AND HEAD OF SAND ISLAND Location. At easterly end of Baker Bay, lying on north side of Columbia River near mouth. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 6151.) Existing Project. Channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, extending from head of Sand Island to Chinook; a turning and mooring basin at upper end of channel, 10 feet deep, 660 feet long, and ranging from 275 to 500 feet wide; reconstruction of easterly 393 feet of existing breakwater; and extension of existing breakwater easterly and thence northerly to connect with shore in vicinity of Portland Street, Chinook, WA. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet aid extreme about 13 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1940. The 10-foot channel depth modification was accomplished September 1958. Rehabilitation of existing breakwater was completed September 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Chinook Packing Company owns a wharf for receiving fresh fish, and one additional fish buying company is located at Chinook. Aportion of wharf is also used as a public landing. At upper end of channel there is a turning and mooring basin with facilities for mooring 350 fishing and recreational craft. Adequate terminal and mooring facilities include a public launching ramp, hoist with 10-ton capacity and suitable supply facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Performed condition surveys. 6. COLUMBIA RIVERAT THE MOUTH, ORAND WA Location. The Columbia River entrance is 645 miles north of San Francisco Bay. Project is about 120 miles downstream of Portland, OR and Vancouver, WA. For description of Columbia River see Section 3. Existing project. Provides for a one-half-mile-wide channel across a bar 55 feet deep (mean lower low water) for the northernmost 2,000 feet, and 48 feet deep (mean lower low water) along the southern 640 feet, to be secured by two rubblemound jetties, spur jetty "A" on the north shore and by dredging. The north jetty is about 2.5 miles long and the south jetty about 6.6 miles long, spur jetty "A" is about 0.3 miles long. Tidal range on bar between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, and extreme about 13 feet. The originally authorized project depth of 40 feet was completed in 1918; south jetty completed in 1914 and north jetty in 1917. A spur jetty (jetty "A') was completed in 1939 (repaired in 1961) for the purpose of channel stabilization. Spur jetty "B" currently is classified "inactive." Dredging of the 48-foot bar channel started April 1956 was completed in September 1957. South jetty rehabilitation started June 1962 was completed September 1964. North jetty rehabilitation started January 1965 was completed April 1965. Additional rehabilitation of the south jetty was initiated in May 1982 and completed in September 1982. Deepening bar channel to 55 feet completed September 1984. In FY 95 a 500 foot section of the south jetty was removed to allow unimpeded access by fisheries resources to 603 acres of intertidal habitat under Section 1135 authority. Project dimensions were available at end of fiscal year. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1999, Annual Report for 1915 and page 1740 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $500,000 toward construction of the north jetty which was completed in 1917. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 4.3 million cubic yards of material was removed. The U.S. hopper dredge Essayons removed 2.8 million cubic yards of material, and the contract hopper dredge Newport removed 1.5 million cubic yards. 7. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA, AND THE DALLES, OR Location. On Columbia River, between Interstate Bridge at Vancouver, WA, 106.5 miles above mouth and The Dalles, OR, mile 191, a distance of 84.5 miles. For description of Columbia River, See Section 3, "Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers Below Vancouver, WA, and Portland, OR." Existing project. Channel 27 feet deep at low water and 300 feet wide between Vancouver, WA, and The Dalles, OR, 84.5 miles; a channel 10 feet deep at low water and 200 feet wide at upstream entrance to Oregon Slough, OR a suitable turning basin adjacent to site of port development in vicinity of Camas and Washougal, WA; a boat basin at Hood River, OR, 500 by 1,300 feet and 10 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, with a connecting channel of same depth to deepwater, and a protecting breakwater on easterly side; a barge channel to waterfront at Bingen, WA, 10 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, 200 feet wide and about 1 mile long, and an access channel 7 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, 100 feet wide and about 1,000 feet long, to a natural mooring basin for small boats near east end of channel; and construction of The Dalles small boat basin, to provide a breakwater and shear boom protected basin about 400 by 800 feet in size with depth of 8 feet below a pool elevation of 72.5 feet at mean sea level. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at Vancouver is about 3 feet and at Bonneville about 0.2 foot at low stages of the river. Extreme tidal ranges are about 4 feet and 0.4 foot, respectively. 28-4 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Existing project is complete. Construction of The Dalles small boat basin, was completed in 1949. Channel dredging at upper end of Oregon Slough was accomplished in 1957. Project depth of 27 feet between Bonneville and The Dalles, OR, was achieved April 1959. The 27-foot channel depth between Vancouver, WA, and Bonneville, OR, was completed May 1938. Improvement of lower entrance of Bonneville Dam lock was completed in May 1961. At the present time, the channel is maintained to a depth of 17 feet, which is adequate for user traffic. Construction of a boat basin at Hood River, OR, and of Camas-Washougal, WA, turning basin was accomplished February 1962. Construction of a barge channel in Columbia River near Bingen, WA, was completed September 1963. Small boat recreation channel 100 feet wide 6 feet deep at South Channel Government Island completed 1985 under section 107. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. At Vancouver, WA, upstream of Interstate Highway bridge at River Mile 108.1 on site of former shipyard are numerous ship-building facilities equipped with railway and river moorage facilities. Also in this area are a paper-storage warehouse with barge slip, two boat building businesses, and a storage dock with gantry crane. Sites are available for development to suit lessee. At Camas, WA, about 13.5 miles upstream from Vancouver, there is a private wharf used for transfer of paper-mill supplies and paper to and from barges, and facilities for discharging bulk oils from barges. At Port of The Dalles (mile 44 above Bonneville) there is a municipal wharf 125 by 1,100 feet for use by tugs and barges. There is a one-story timber and corrugated iron warehouse, 94 by 461 feet, on this wharf. Aprivate elevator with a capacity of 40,000 bushels and a public elevator of 1,113,800-bushel capacity for handling bulk grain to barges are also at The Dalles. Public elevator has rail, truck, and water connections. There is a port owned rail connection about three-fourths mile below municipal wharf where certain types of cargo may be handled between railroad cars and barges. At numerous locations along the entire waterway there are facilities for transfer of logs to water from trucks and public and private boat basins. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition survey was performed. U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 236,000 cubic yards. 8. COLUMBIA RIVER, SEAFARERS MEMORIAL, HAMMOND, OR Location. The memorial will be located at PointAdams, in the City ofWarrenton, OR, at River Mile 8.5 on the Columbia River approximately 50 yards off shore and adjacent to an existing Corps of Engineers pile dike. Existing project. None. Local cooperation. ALocal CooperationAgreement (LCA) with the local sponsor, City of Warrenton, OR, is being developed. This LCA will require the sponsor to pay for all costs above the authorized $150,000 for engineering, design, acquisition and construction of a support structure to serve as the foundation for the Seafarers Memorial. In addition, the sponsor is providing the statue for which the foundation structure is being built. Operations during fiscal year. All work has been suspended until the LCA has been approved by all parties and the local sponsor has raised sufficient funds for purchase of the statue and any costs above the $150,000 limit for the support structure. 9. COOS BAY, OR Location. On Oregon coast 200 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 445 miles north of San Francisco Bay. It is about 13 miles long and 1 mile wide, with an area at high tide of about 15 square miles. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18587.) Existing project. Two rubblemound, high-tide jetties at entrance; a channel across the outer bar 45 feet deep and 700 feet wide, reducing gradually to 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide near River Mile 1 and continuing to about mile 9; thence a channel 35 feet deep and generally 400 feet wide to mile 15; an anchorage area 35 feet deep, 800 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long at Empire (River Mile 5.5); turning basins at North Bend (River Mile 12.5) and Coalbank (River Mile 14.7) 35 feet deep, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; a channel 22 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Smith's Mill (River Mile 15) to Millington (River Mile 17); a small boat basin, about 500 by 900 feet at Charleston, with a connecting channel, 16 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 6,200 feet long, to deep water in Coos Bay, and construction of a protecting breakwater and bulkhead. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 7 feet and extreme is about 11 feet at both the entrance and at Coos Bay. South jetty was completed in 1928, north jetty in.1929, and 24-foot channel in 1937. The south jetty was restored in 1941 and 1942 by construction of a concrete cap for full length of the jetty. Excavation of channel to 30 feet deep and generally 300 feet wide from entrance of Isthmus Slough was completed in 1951. Dredging outer bar channel to a depth of 40 feet, decreasing to 30 feet at Guano Rock was completed in 1952. Construction of the Charleston Channel and small-boat basin was completed in September 1956. Rehabilitation of south jetty was started in June 1962 and completed December 1963. Repair of north jetty was completed in August 1989. Construction of the deeper and wider channel to mile 15 was completed in 1979. Deepening of Charleston channel and turning basin completed in 1985 under Section 107. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1987 to Annual Report for 1915 and page 1728 of Annual Report for 1938.) A modification to the existing project was authorized in the FY 1996 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, Public Law 104-46, November 13, 1995. This authorization provided for deepening the channel by 2 feet to 47 feet below mean lower low water (MLLW) from the entrance to Guano Rock (river mile 1) and to 37 feet below MLLW from river mile 1 to 15. Public Law 104-46 also provided for deepening 28-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 by two feet and expanding the turning basin at river mile 12 by 100 feet from 800 by 1000 feet to 900 by 1000 feet. The excavation material for the channel deepening was transported to the ocean for disposal. The cost for preparation of the plans and specifications and the construction of the project was $11,616,000, of which $8,116,000 was federal and $3,500,000 was non-federal. In addition, the sponsor paid 100 percent of the estimated cost for dredging the berth areas. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-5 of FY 1981 Annual Report. The sponsor, International Port of Coos Bay, signed a Project Cooperation Agreement on May 8, 1996 for the project modification to deepen the channel as authorized in Public Law 104-46. In accordance with cost sharing requirements of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the Federal Government provided 75 percent of the costs associated with the general navigation features of the project. The non-federal sponsor was required to provide 25 percent of the total construction cost of the general navigation features up front. The sponsor was also required to provide an additional 10 percent of the cost of the general navigation features of the project in cash over a period not to exceed 30 years. Terminal facilities. At North Bend there is a municipal dock 649 feet long fronting on channel, about 2,380 feet of privately owned mill docks, and three oil receiving terminals in vicinity. At Coos Bay there is a privately owned dock with a frontage of 1,345 feet, open to the public on equal terms; several small landings for fishing and harbor craft; and three lumber docks with 1,300-foot, 576-foot and 500-foot frontages, respectively. In the North Spit industrial area, there is one woodchip loading facility having a frontage of 1200 feet and a smaller Tdock operated by the Port of Coos Bay. At Eastside, on Isthmus Slough, there is a 200-foot dock. At Empire there is a privately owned lumber dock with frontage of 510 feet, and an oil terminal, owned by Port of Coos Bay, for receipt of petroleum products by barge. A barge slip also owned by the Port was completed in 1986. At Charleston there are wharves, for receipt of fresh fish and shellfish and a large seafood receiving and processing plant. There are also two municipally owned small-boat basins, open to all on equal terms, capable of mooring 250 fishing and recreation craft. Servicing facilities for small craft are available at all facilities, and public launching ramps have been constructed in Charleston area by private interests. A privately owned floating moorage on Joe Ney Slough has facilities for mooring about 50 fishing vessels. At Jordan Cove area there is a dock, 248 feet long, for wood chip ships. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract to deepen the channel was awarded on May 23, 1996 and was completed in March 1997. A second contract was awarded in June 1997. The project construction was completed in first quarter of fiscal year 1998, except for post construction monitoring which is scheduled to continue through fiscal year 2000. Maintenance: A total of 1,047,000 cubic yards of material was removed. US hopper dredge Essayons removed 771,000 cubic yards; the US hopper dredge Yaquina removed 154,000 cubic yards; and the contract dredge Seattle removed 122,000 cubic yards. The sand-bypasser Sandwick worked 35 days in Charleston entrance channel. 10. COQUILLE RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Coast Range, flows generally westerly for about 100 miles, and empties into Pacific Ocean at Bandon, OR, 225 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 420 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18186.) Existing project. Two rubblemound high-tide jetties at river mouth, south jetty 2,700 feet long and the north, 3,450 feet long; and a channel 13 feet deep at mean lower low water and of suitable width from the sea to a point 1 mile above old Coquille River Lighthouse, and snagging to State highway bridge at city of Coquille. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth is 7 feet and extreme about 10 feet. Jetties were completed in 1908 and entrance channel in 1933. North jetty was reconstructed in 1942 and a 750-foot extension to easterly end was constructed in 1951. South jetty was repaired in 1954 and north jetty in 1956. Coquille Lighthouse rehabilitation was completed June 21, 1976. Port of Bandon constructed boat basin facility in conjunction with protective breakwater and entrance channel construction in 1985, under Section 107. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1986 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1727 of Annual Report for 1938.) A plan to deepen the entrance channel of the Coquille River from 13 feet to 18 feet was approved in May 1988. The economics were reevaluated in FY1993 and the project was not economically feasible at that time. Local cooperation. Restoration of lighthouse using Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects funding, required 50 percent cost sharing with non-Federal sponsor (Oregon State Parks). Terminal facilities. At Bandon: A publicly owned wharf, and a small-boat basin open to all on equal terms. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: US hopper dredge Yaquina removed 5,924 cubic yards of material from the entrance channel. 11. DEPOE BAY, OR Location. Harbor on Oregon coast 100 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5902.) Existing project. Two breakwaters north of entrance; an entrance channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide; an inner basin 750 feet long, 390 feet wide and 8 feet deep with retaining 28-6 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT wall along easterly side; and a stone spending beach. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1939 and project modifications, enlarging the basin and deepening to 8 feet, were accomplished in June 1952 and August 1966. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities, in inner basin, consist of landings and floats to accommodate operators of excursion and commercial fishing boats. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. A project condition survey and miscellaneous inspections were performed. 12. PORT ORFORD, OR Location. On Oregon coast 250 miles south of Columbia River entrance and 390 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (NOAA Chart 18203 and Geological Survey Quadrangle, Port Orford, OR) Existing project. Improvement of harbor by 55-foot extension of existing locally constructed breakwater and dredging of a turning basin, 340 feet long, 100 feet wide and 16 feet deep. Breakwater was completed October, 1968. Turning basin was completed September 1971. The authorization was modified by WRDA 92 to allow the Corps to maintain the authorized navigation channel within 50 feet of the port facility. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A dock which is a timber piling structure about 210 by 70 feet, equipped with hydraulic crane for lifting boats from the water to dock for repairs and/or storage and removing fish catches from boats. Expansion of the dock structure to 210 x 220 feet is complete. The installation of the second hydraulic crane was completed in FY 1986. About 150 fishing and private boats use this dock each year. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: During the summer months the sand-bypasser Sandwick worked 40 days. A contractor dragline dredged 3,000 cubic yards. 13. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Surveys were conducted during the fiscal year at a cost of $84,168; (See Table 28-1). 14. ROGUE RIVER HARBOR AT GOLD BEACH, OR Location. Rises in Cascade Range in southwestern Oregon; flows westerly through Coast Range, and empties into Pacific Ocean 264 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 381 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Chart 18202.) Existing project. Two jetties at entrance, and a channel 13 feet deep and 300 feet wide from ocean to a point immediately below State highway bridge, about 1 mile, including widening channel at a point about 0.25 mile below bridge to form a turning basin 13 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 650 feet long. At request of local interests, turning basin was located in south portion of estuary downstream from a point 0.25 mile below bridge. This change was effected to permit adequate terminal facilities to be constructed adjacent to turning basin. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Range of tide between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 7 feet, and extreme about 14 feet. Project as authorized has been completed. Construction of two jetties at entrance was completed September 1960. Dredging river channel by contract and entrance bar by government plant was completed October 1961. North jetty rehabilitation along channel side was completed October 1966. Breakwater construction and dredging, under contract awarded in September 1964, was 17 percent accomplished when flood of December 1964 destroyed all completed works. Contract was terminated as further construction at that location was considered unfeasible. Bank protection work at Wedderburn location was completed in October 1972. A breakwater, constructed by Port of Gold Beach, was completed during 1973. In 1985, three pile dikes, located on the south side of channel oceanward of the boat basin entrance, were completed. At the direction of Congress, the boat basin entrance channel was relocated approximately 1,000 feet upstream to a new opening in the breakwater provided by the Port of Gold Beach. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are various landings for fishing and recreational craft. At Wedderburn, across river from Gold Beach, is a facility to accommodate excursion passengers and small freight items destined for various private landings between Wedderbum and Agness, OR. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The US hopper dredge Yaquina removed 58,546 cubic yards from the ocean entrance. A contract pipeline removed 22,639 cubic yards from the relocated boat basin access channel. 15. SIUSLAW RIVER, OR Location. Rises in coast range, flows about 110 miles westerly and empties into Pacific Ocean about 160 miles south of entrance of Columbia River and 485 miles north of San Francisco Bay, CA. (See NOAA Charts 19583 and 18580.) Existing project. Provides for 2 high-tide, rubblemound jetties 750 feet apart at the outer end, the north jetty 8,390 feet long (600 feet unconstructed) and the south jetty 4,200 feet long; an entrance channel 18 feet deep and 300 feet wide from deep water in ocean to a point 1,500 feet inside the outer end of existing north jetty; thence a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide with additional widening at bends, and about 5 miles long, to a turning basin, 16 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 600 feet long, opposite Siuslaw dock at Florence; a channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide from Florence to mile 16.5; and at River Mile 15.5 a turning basin 12 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 500 feet long. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth of river is 7 feet and extreme about 11 feet. During low stages of river, tidal effect extends to Mapleton, 20.5 miles 28-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 above mouth. (For details relating to previous project, see page 1988 of Annual Report for 1915.) A modification to the existing project was authorized by Public Law 96-367, October 1, 1980. North and south jetty modifications were completed in FY 86. Modifications provide for extending the north and south jetties by 1,900 and 2,300 feet respectively. The jetty extensions terminate at approximately the minus 25-foot contour. Spur jetties were constructed on each jetty extension to reduce longshore currents from transporting material around the heads of the jetties. Each spur jetty is 400 feet long and originates approximately 900 feet shoreward of the jetty head. The north jetty spur is oriented 45 degrees to the north of the existing jetty alignment and the south jetty spur 45 degrees to the south of the jetty alignment. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Port dock at Florence, 150 feet wide and 350 feet long, is about 5.3 miles above river entrance and accommodates a fish-receiving station at east end of wharf which maintains a 2-ton capacity winch and supplies gasoline, oil and ice to fishermen. Other facilities at Florence consist of various floatways which provide docking facilities for fishing vessels and other small craft and a floating dock with accommodations for 75 commercial fishing vessels. Adjacent to commercial basin is mooring basin with accommodations for 200 sport boats of all sizes. Modem docks for loading ocean-going barges with packaged lumber is maintained at Mapleton and owned by the Davison Lumber Company. There are also a number of private landings and log booms between Cushman and Mapleton tocommodativer traffic. These facilities are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 317,185 cubic yards of material. 16. SKIPANON CHANNEL, OR Location. In tidal waterway extending south 2.7 miles from deep water in Columbia River. Channel enters Columbia about 10 miles above mouth and 4 miles below Astoria, OR. (See NOAA Chart 18523.) Existing project. Channel 30 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide extending from deep water in Columbia River to railroad bridge at Warrenton, OR, distance of 1.8 miles, turning basin of same depth, mooring basin 12 feet deep at mean lower low water at Warrenton, OR, and channel 7 feet deep, generally 40 feet wide, with increased widths at log dumps and terminals, for 4,500 feet via cutoff channel above railroad bridge. Channel is maintained to 16 feet which is adequate for user traffic. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, extreme is about 13 feet. Project as authorized is complete. Dredging river channel and turning basin was completed in 1939. Construction of small-boat mooring basin at Warrenton, OR, was completed October 1957, and fill stabilization work was accomplished in August 1958. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. City of Warrenton owns wharf with a 300-foot frontage open to pubic on equal terms. One privately owned cannery wharf with a 300-foot frontage is used for unloading fish and handling fish nets. One privately owned boatyard has floats and moorage facilities for use by a maximum of 80 small boats. Small-boat basin has facilities for numerous fishing and recreation craft, and a privately owned lumber mill has a barge loading facility for chips and lumber. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 13,927 cubic yards of material from the outer channel. 17. TILLAMOOK BAYAND BAR, OR Location. Bay is on Oregon coast about 50 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See NOAA Charts 18520 and 18558.) Existing project. Provides for a jetty about 5,700 feet long on north side of entrance and a jetty 8,000 feet long on south side; a channel through bar 18 feet deep and of such width as can be practically and economically obtained; for a channel 200 feet wide and 18 feet deep from deep water in bay to Miami Cove; and for initial dredging to 12 feet deep of a small-boat basin and approach thereto at Garibaldi, OR. Project also provides for improvement of Bayocean Peninsula, OR, by construction of sand and rockfill dike 1.4 miles long, on alignment extending between Pitcher Point and town of Bayocean. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet, extreme is about 14 feet. Hobsonville Channel portion of project is inactive. Except for construction of Hobsonville Channel portion, classified inactive, channels were completed in 1927, north jetty in 1933, improvement of Bayocean Peninsula in 1956 and small-boat basin in 1958. The north jetty was rehabilitated in 1965 and again in 1991. South jetty construction was initiated in 1969, extended in 1974, and completed to the authorized 8,000 feet in 1978. 18 foot channel to Miami Cove is inactive due to mill closure. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1989 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1474 of Annual Report for 1936.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-9 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At Garibaldi: A facility owned by the Port of Bay City, for shipping lumber and receiving logs, a public landing suitable for mooring fishing vessels, towboats, and other craft. Small-boat basin has adequate facilities for mooring fishing and recreational craft. Aprivately owned boat ramp and moorage is available for recreational craft. At Bay City: Aprivately owned wharf used exclusively for receipt of fresh fish and shellfish. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project condition surveys were performed. 28-8 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 18. UMPQUA RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Cascade Range, flows westerly about 120 miles, and empties into Pacific Ocean 180 miles south of Columbia River and 465 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18584.) Existing project. A jetty on north side of entrance about 8,000 feet long, a south jetty 4,200 feet long extending to a point 1,800 feet south of outer end of north jetty; dredging to provide a usable entrance channel 26 feet deep, and a river channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide, from mouth to Reedsport, a distance of about 12 miles with a turning basin at Reedsport 1,000 feet long, 600 feet wide, and 22 feet deep; deepening of channel at Winchester Bay to 16 feet deep by 100 feet wide for 3,100 feet, then adding 16 feet deep by 100 feet wide for 500 feet, and 12 feet deep by 75 feet wide for 950 feet beyond boat basin making up the East Boat Channel. A new West Boat Channel was added 16 feet deep by 100 feet wide for 4,300 feet and completed in 1984. Project was modified in 1951 to provide a channel in Scholfield River, but this portion of the project is currently inactive. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at river mouth is 7 feet; and extreme range is about 11 feet. North jetty was completed in 1930. Extension to original south jetty was completed in 1938. Dredging a 22-foot channel from mouth of river to Reedsport was completed in 1941. Gardiner Channel and turning basin was completed in 1949 and Winchester Bay Channel and mooring basin in 1956. Rehabilitation of south jetty was completed August, 1963. Extension of training jetty was completed October 9, 1980. Deepening Winchester Bay East Channel and new West Channel completed 1984 under Section 107. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 2967 of Annual Report for 1898 and page 1732 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At Gardiner there is about 650 feet of wharf frontage. Also there is an oil unloading facility owned by International Paper Co. for exclusive use of tanker barges. Port of Umpqua owns one wharf with 456 feet of water frontage, of which 228 feet is usable for vessels and another with about 75 feet of water frontage which has not been used generally for commercial shipping. On Bolon Island across the river from Reedsport a wharf was constructed which has about 5 acres of open storage for lumber and available to all on equal terms. At Winchester Bay, 2 miles from river entrance there is a major sports and commercial fishing harbor. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 317,185 cubic yards of material, and the sand-bypasser Sandwick worked 11 days at Winchester Bay. 19. WILLAMETTE RIVERAT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR Location. Locks and dam covered by this project are at Willamette Falls, a rocky reef in Willamette River at Oregon City, OR, about 26 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. Canal and locks were originally constructed by private interest in 1873 and were purchased by the United States in April 1915 for $375,000. Final report on purchase and rehabilitation of canal and locks is in the Annual Report for 1923, when project was reported 98 percent complete. The project includes four locks a canal basin and an extra guard lock used to prevent flooding when river levels are high. The system acts as a fluid staircase between the upper and lower reaches of the Willamette River. Total length of existing canals and locks is about 3,500 feet. Principal features of existing canal and locks at Willamette Falls are set forth in Table 28-J. Ordinary fluctuation of stage of water above locks is 12 feet and extreme, due to flood conditions, 20 feet. Below locks, ordinary fluctuation is 15 feet and extreme 50 feet. Until the 1940's, the gates were opened manually. Now, the gates are operated by hydraulic pumps controlled by switches in two control stations with the aid of closed-circuit television and radio communication. All the gates have been replaced under minor rehabilitation funds. Existing locks and grounds are in good condition and in continuous operation. New service building was completed in 1988 costing $523,000. The project was placed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1974, and was established as an Oregon Civil Engineering Landmark in 1991. As a result of the mill closure in 1996, one of two shifts was eliminated and hours of operation reduced. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Simpson Paper closed the mill in 1996 after over 100 years of operations. The mill was sold to West Linn Paper. West Linn Paper has a timber wharf about 850 feet long, extending to and supported by a concrete division wall built in lock canal by the United States. The use of the wharf for operations purposes by the mill may be changed due to shipping changes by the new owner. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. 20. YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR Location. Yaquina Bay is on Oregon coast, 113 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18581.) Existing project. Two high tide rubblemound jetties at entrance, north jetty 7,000 feet, and south jetty 8,600 feet long; a spur jetty on channel side of south jetty 4,700 feet from its sea end, 800 feet long; five groins channelward from south jetty; channel 40 feet deep for a general width of 400 feet across bar and at outer end of entrance channel; a channel 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide to a turning basin of same depth, 900 to 1,200 feet wide and 1,400 feet long, and a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 30-foot channel at about mile 2.4, thence upstream to abandoned rail;oad terminus atYaquina, a distance 28-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 of about 4.5 miles. Project also provides for two small boat mooring basins at Newport, OR. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. At mile 1.2 a 1,300 foot long breakwater protecting the Port of Newport South Beach Marina together with an entrance channel 8 feet long by 100 feet wide for a distance of 2,035 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in May 1952. Restoration of jetties was completed in 1934 and extension of north jetty 1,000 feet seaward was completed in 1940. Construction of mooring basin at Newport and dredging of channel and turning basin to project dimensions were completed during fiscal year 1949. Restoration of north jetty was again accomplished in 1956. Under modification of July 3, 1958, extension of north jetty was completed in September 1966, dredging of 40-foot bar channel and 30-foot river channel was completed in October 1968, and extension of south jetty was completed in June 1972. The north jetty was rehabilitated in 1978 and again in 1988. (For details relating to previous projects see Annual Report for 1893, part 4, page 3314, and Annual Report for 1938, page 1736.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At McLean Point, on north side of bay, about 2 miles from entrance, Port of Newport has two berths capable of serving ocean-going vessels, one 435 feet long, the second 520 feet long. At the time the second berth was dredged, a retaining wall and fill of 6 acres were constructed adjacent to deep water. There now is 40 acres of filled land adjacent to deep water, and of this total, 7 acres were constructed in 1956- 57. This facility has necessary carriers and lift trucks for handling lumber cargoes, warehouse for covered cargo storage, and is open to all on equal terms. Port of Newport also has a public wharf with 300 feet of frontage for servicing fishing boats. In addition, Port of Newport maintains 510 berths for mooring commercial and sport fishing vessels. There are several seafood companies on the bay which have their own facilities for handling fresh fish and crab. Supplies and petroleum products are readily available for small vessels. On south side of bay about 1.2 miles above entrance, Port of Newport has constructed South Beach Marina which can handle approximately 600 pleasure craft and shallow draft fishing boats. Public facilities include public automobile and boat trailer parking, boat launching ramp, fuel dock, fishing pier, and picnic area. A dry boat moorage of 120 boats, is completed. A swing hoist with 3-ton capacity is currently available and one with 60-ton capacity is planned. About 1.5 miles above entrance, Oregon Aqua Foods, subsidiary of Weyerhaeuser Company, maintains a commercial fish farm facility. About 2.0 miles above entrance, Oregon State University, in conjunction with the Marine Science Center on 52 acres, maintains a 220-foot pier for docking large and small research vessels and a 100-foot float for docking small boats. Docking facilities are restricted to research vessels and State of Oregon small boats. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 202,310 cubic yards. Contract hopper dredge Newport removed 150,000 cubic yards. Sand was removed from approximately 1,000 feet of the south jetty, the jetty sealed with rock and filter fabric, and the sand replaced to protect public safety and prevent sand migration through the structure. 21. YAQUINA RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Coast Range, flows about 50 miles in a westerly direction, and empties into Yaquina Bay, on Oregon coast. (See US Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 5802 and 6058.) Existing project. Provides for two controlling half-tide dikes of piling, brush, and stone, each about 1,100 feet long (constructed by local interests), and for a channel 10 feet deep and generally 150 feet wide on Yaquina River and 200 feet wide in Depot Slough, extending from town of Yaquina near RM 4.0 to Toledo at RM 14.4. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet and extreme about 12 feet. Freshet heights are about 12 feet at mouth of Depot Slough. Channel work authorized March 1913 was completed in 1914. Additional work authorized in 1960 was completed in 1969. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Near town of Yaquina at river mouth, which is also head of Yaquina Bay, there is a moorage for small vessels and a small-craft shipyard. The Port of Toledo has public-terminal facilities for accommodation of local craft. There are also privately owned facilities for loading lumber barges, receipt of bunker fuel, and log rollways for receipt of logs. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed. Flood Control 22. APPLEGATE LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. In Jackson County, OR, on Upper Applegate River, a tributary of Rogue River, at River Mile 46, about 23 airline miles southwest of Medford, OR. Existing project. A gravel-fill embankment dam, 242 feet high from streambed to crest with an overall length of 1,300 feet. A gate-controlled concrete chute-type spillway on the left abutment, and a regulating outlet conduit, and intake tower with multilevel intakes on the left side of valley floor. Lake, 5 miles long, provides 75,000 acre-feet ofusable storage for flood control and water conservation utilization. Project controls runoff from a drainage area of 223 square miles. In addition to flood control, reservoir is operated to provide irrigation, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control, and recreation benefits. Recreation facilities were provided by the Corps of Engineers with operation and maintenance by the USFS under a memorandum of agreement. Project is complete and operating. 28-10 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Local cooperation. Authorizing act requires that State of Oregon insure maintenance of stream flow released for fishery. In addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in a manner and to an extent consistent with reclamation laws and policies. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife made filing May 31, 1962 with State Engineer for water rights for use of stored water and natural flows for fish habitat improvement in amounts and at times specified in project authorization. The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation has made a feasibility study of Applegate Irrigation Division. The results of the study indicate that at present there does not appear to be a feasible Federal irrigation project for the Applegate River valley. Local interests have furnished all local cooperation specified by the 1970 Flood Control Act. The assurances were approved by the Secretary of the Army on May 8, 1975. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance was performed. Freshets regulated by Applegate Lake on Applegate River and Rogue River are shown in Table 28-K. 23. BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR Location. On Blue River, a major tributary of McKenzie River, 1.8 miles above confluence of the two streams at the confluence of Quartz Creek and Blue River and about 42 miles easterly of Eugene, OR. Existing project. A gravel-fill embankment dam 1,329 feet long at crest including spillway and 319 feet above the lowest point of the general foundation. A concrete gravity chute-type spillway with two gates is located on left abutment. Outlet works are in left abutment. On left shore of reservoir an earth-andgravel fill embankment, about 1,535 feet long and 70 feet high, closes a low saddle between Blue River and McKenzie River. Project controls runoff from drainage area of 88 square miles. Reservoir provides 85,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service under a Memorandum of Agreement. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1963 and operation for flood control was effective in October 1968. Settlement of claims was completed in May 1974. Eugene Water and Electric Board (EWEB) was granted a FERC license in November 1989 to install two small hydropower units at Blue River Lake project. EWEB has delayed their plans for hydropower units pending the conclusion of a Corps proposal to add water temperature control to the regulating outlet tower. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Blue River Lake project on Blue River, a major tributary of McKenzie River, are shown in Table 28-K. 24. COTIAGE GROVE LAKE, OR Location. On Coast Fork ofWillamette River, 29 miles from mouth. Coast Fork rises in Douglas County, OR, on western slope of Cascade Range and northern slope of Calapooia Range, flows north for 49 miles, and unites with Middle Fork to form main Willamette River. Existing project. An earthfill dam, 1,750 feet long at crest, 114 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation, a concrete gravity free overflow spillway 264 feet long near the right abutment, and a concrete gravity non-overflow section 96 feet long forming the right abutment. Total length of dam is 2,110 feet. Outlet works, consisting of three gate-controlled conduits, pass through spillway section. Reservoir provides 30,060 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of drainage area of 104 square miles. Project is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflow for navigation and for other purposes. Recreational development consists of day use and overnight facilities at five sites operated by the Corps of Engineers. Construction of project initiated August 1940 was completed April 1952. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since September 1942. Local cooperation. Development of additional recreation facilities will require a local sponsor willing to cost share and assume all operation and maintenance of park facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance work continued. Freshets regulated by Cottage Grove Lake on Coast Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 28-K. 25. DORENA LAKE, OR Location. On Row River, OR, 7 miles from mouth. Row River rises in Lane County on western slope of Cascade Range, flows northwest for 19 miles, and enters Coast Fork of Willamette River 19.5 miles above mouth. Existing project. An earthfill embankment dam, 3,352 feet long at crest and 145 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation. Concrete gravity free-overflow spillway, 200 feet long, forms right abutment. Outlet works on five slide-gatecontrolled conduits pass through spillway section. Reservoir provides 70,500 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of 265 square miles. The Project is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigational and other purposes. Construction of project initiated June 1941 was completed October 1952 except for construction of additional recreation facilities that were funded under the Code 710 program. Future recreation facility construction will be accomplished in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane County, OR Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since November 1949. Local cooperation. A multiple project cost sharing agreement has been in force with Lane County since Sept. 1976. It includes 4 projects and 14 parks. At Dorena Lake, 6 parks included in the agreement are managed by Lane County under a lease agreement. Future recreation development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Cooperated with Bureau of Land Management on establishing rails-to-trails route along the north shore of the lake. Freshets regulated by Dorena Lake 28-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 project on Row and Coast Fork Willamette Rivers are shown in Table 28-K. 26. ELK CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. In Jackson County, OR at River Mile 1.7 on Elk Creek, a tributary of Rogue River, about 26.5 miles northerly from Medford, OR. Existing project. Construction work for the 249-foot high roller compacted concrete gravity dam, 2,600 feet long at the crest, with a gate controlled concrete chute spillway, regulating outlet conduits, power penstock and multiple use intake tower attached to the upstream face of the dam has been stopped due to a court injunction. The project would control runoff from a drainage area of 135 square miles, and provide future municipal and industrial water supply, irrigation, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control, and recreation benefits. Construction of the project was initiated in February 1971. Work completed to date includes construction of roads and the main dam structure and outlet works to elevation 1563 (approximately 1/3 proposed height). All lands for the project have been acquired with the exception of the clearing of water rights for a seemingly abandoned irrigation canal which originates within the project boundaries. Environmental statements were filed with Council of Environmental Quality June 15, 1972 and Supplement No. 1 addressing water quality and social/demogralihic information was filed with EPA on December 24, 1980. Estimated federal cost of project is $174,000,000. In October 1985, the Corps was advised by Oregon Natural Resources Council (ONRC), an environmental group, they intended to file suit against the government to halt construction of Elk Creek, on specific environmental issues. A hearing on the motion for a preliminary injunction was scheduled before Oregon Federal District Court December 16, 1986. On that date, the Court refused to grant the injunction to halt construction and bids were opened and the contract subsequently awarded to Ohbayashi Corp. An appeal was filed by ONRC in March, 1986 and heard by the 9th Circuit Court in July, 1986. On June 23, 1987, the Circuit Court reversed the decision of the District Court and returned the case to the District Court for appropriate injunctive relief. The resulting District court order issued in August and September 1987 allowed construction of the dam to El. 1563 ft. (approximately 1/3 the height of the dam), backfilling of the foundation key trench, aggregate processing, quarry restoration, and other miscellaneous work. The construction of the main dam to elevation 1563 was reached in mid-January 1988. The Department of Justice petitioned the 9th Circuit Court for a rehearing. On December 10, 1987 the 9th Circuit Court rejected the petition for a rehearing, requiring the termination of the existing main dam and reservoir clearing contracts. The Department of Justice petitioned with the U.S. Supreme Court for a review of the decisions made by the 9th Circuit Court. The hearing before the U.S. Supreme Court was held May 1, 1989. The U.S. Supreme Court remanded the case back for injunctive relief. In September 1989, the District Court was requested by the Corps to remand the case back to the Corps for preparation of a supplemental EIS. To lift the injunction against the dam a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (EISS) has been prepared to address cumulative effects. Additional studies have been conducted in water temperature and turbidity, and fish and wildlife. The EISS identified a preferred interim operating alternative of operating the project without a conservation pool. The reservoir would only temporarily store water during flood control operations. On July 22, 1992, the Department of Justice filed a motion with the court to remove the injunction. A hearing was held on May 20, 1993. The ONRC and Department of Justice filed appeals with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals over the issues of the legal sufficiency of the EISS and on the authority of the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management to issue a determination of impacts under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. The Ninth Circuit Court ofAppeals ruled on the two cases on April 21, 1995. In a unanimous decision, the Court ruled that the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management do not have a veto authority over purely Federal projects under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act where Congress makes the decision to authorize and fund their development. In a 2-1 decision, the Court also reversed the District Court decision that EISS #2 met the requirements of the earlier Ninth Circuit opinion and awarded attorney fees to the plaintiffs. The case was remanded with instructions to prepare a third supplement adequately addressing all issues raised under the NEPAprocess. In FY 1993, Congress added $2,500,000 for design necessary to complete the project pending removal of the injunction. In FY97 Congress made the remainder of these funds available to plan and implement long term management measures. Due to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision, the Corps will not perform the environmental studies under NEPA necessary to remove the Federal court injunction. The Corps notified Congress of its intention to begin studies of options for long tenn management of the project in its uncompleted state. Local cooperation. Authorizing act requires that State of Oregon take action prior to construction to insure maintenance in stream of flow to be released for fishery. In addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in a manner and to an extent consistent with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation laws and policies. On February 24, 1966, State of Oregon Water Resources Board filed for withdrawal rights of 25 cubic feet per second to maintain a minimum flow for fish. Development of recreation facilities require a local sponsor willing to cost share in recreation development and assume operations and maintenance of park facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Plans and specifications for passive fish passage were initiated in FY97 and completed in FY98. 27. FALL CREEK LAKE, OR Location. On Fall Creek, a tributary of Middle Fork Willamette River, about 7 miles above confluence of the streams and about 19 miles southeasterly of Eugene, OR. 28-12 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Existing project. An earth-and-gravel fill embankment about 5,100 feet long at crest and 193 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation. A gated concrete gravity spillway is in left abutment. Outlet is in right abutment. Reservoir provides 115,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. Construction of project began May 1962 and was essentially complete November 1965. Reservoir storage for flood control was effective October 1965. Sky Camp Lodge was completed October 1978. Future recreation facilities will be provided in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Bethel School District. Bethel School District has a sub-agreement with the Springfield Kiwanis Club for management of this facility. The Corps manages one park at the project. Local cooperation. Fall Creek Lake is included in the Lane County multiple project cost sharing agreement. Two parks are managed by Lane County under lease agreement. Future development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Freshets regulated by Fall Creek Lake project on Fall Creek, a tributary of the Middle Fork, Willamette River are shown in Table 28-K. 28. FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR Location. On Long Tom River, 23.6 miles from the mouth. Long Tom River rises in Lane county, OR, on eastern slope of Coast Range, flows north for 50 miles, and enters Willamette River 147 miles above its mouth. Existing project. A main dam 6,624 feet long at crest and 49 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation and two auxiliary dikes, 915 and 3,929 feet long, along northeasterly boundary of lake. Main dam consists of an earthfill embankment dam 6,330 feet long, a concrete gravity spillway near left abutment with a non-overflow structure 46 feet long, containing outlet works, and an overflow structure, 248 feet long, controlled by six automatic gates. Project includes rectification of channel of Long Tom River downstream of dam. Reservoir provides 110,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 275 square miles. Reservoir protects Long Tom River Valley and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley generally and to increase low water-flows for navigation and other purposes. Dam was originally constructed in 1941 to height of 47 feet. Provision of additional storage for flood control was obtained in 1965 by raising embankments 2 feet to 49 feet above lowest point of the general foundation. Construction of project initiated April 1940 was completed August 1951, except for provision of additional storage for flood control authorized in 1962 and completed April 1965, and construction of additional recreation facilities funded through the Code 710 program. Construction of three waterfowl impoundments was completed in 1994 under Section 1135 authority. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since December 1941. Development of future recreation facilities will be in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane county, and requires a 50 percent contribution by the county. Development is subject to availability of funds by the Government and the county. Local cooperation. Fern Ridge Lake is included in the Lane County multiple project cost sharing agreement. Three parks are managed by Lane County under lease agreements. Future development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife manages 5,000 acres of land and water for migratory waterfowl under a lease agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Completed embankment repair and initiated regulating outlet discharge and stilling basin repairs. Estimated completion FY99. Freshets regulated by Fern Ridge Lake project on Long Tom River are shown in Table 28- K. 29. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Funds appropriated for inspection of completed local flood protection works are used to determine maintenance condition of completed works and to ascertain whether those works are being properly maintained by local interests. Numerous leveed areas and 213 bank protection works were inspected at various locations along both banks of Lower Columbia River below Bonneville Dam, along Oregon Coast, in eastern Oregon, in southern Oregon and in Willamette River Basin. Aerial inspection of revetments in Willamette River Basin are supplemented by an onsite inspection at locations requiring maintenance. A representative of sponsoring districts accompanied the Portland District representatives performing the levee inspections. Deficiencies in maintenance and need for repairs were discussed with sponsoring districts' representatives and a report was made to each sponsor with recommendations for improving maintenance. The program to improve maintenance of completed Federal projects initiated by House Appropriations Committee on Civil Functions was continued. Fiscal year costs were $197,604. 30. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, ORAND WA Location. On Columbia River and tributaries between Sandy River, OR, and mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. Provides for construction of 224,000 linear feet of bank protection works at 96 locations along Lower Columbia River below River Mile 125 and along principal tributaries in this reach, to protect existing improvements such as levees and developed industrial lands from further erosion. Existing project is a unit of general comprehensive plan for flood control, navigation, and other purposes in Columbia River Basin. Construction of project began in July 1961 and is 88 percent complete. A total of 191,000 linear feet of bank protection work at 84 locations has been completed. Estimated Federal cost is $28,000,000. Local cooperation. Flood Control Act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way; make necessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alterations; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate completed works. Under Section 103 of the Water Resources Development 1-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Act of 1986, Local Interests will also be required to make a cash contribution for construction of each site. Estimated costs for all requirements of local cooperation are $2,000,000. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Coordination with sponsors and evaluation of local erosion problems continued. 31. MOUNT ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA Location. On the North Fork Toutle River, 2 miles upstream from its confluence with the Green River, in Cowlitz County, southwest Washington. The river systems impacted by the project include Toutle, Cowlitz and Columbia Rivers. Most of the population affected by the problems reside in the communities ofLongview, Kelso, Lexington, and Castle Rock, Washington. Existing project. The project was authorized by the Supplement Appropriations Act, 1985 (Public Law 88, 99th Congress, August 15, 1985). The Act includes authorization "... to construct, operate and maintain a sediment retention structure near the confluence of the Toutle and Green River, Washington, with such design features and associated downstream actions as are necessary, in accordance with the Feasibility Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 1984." The project will provide a permanent solution to potential flooding on the Cowlitz River from sedimentation problems created by the eruption of Mt. St. Helens. The Decision document recommended construction of a single sediment retention structure (SRS) with a 125-foot high spillway at the Green River site on the North Fork Toutle River, improvements to the levee system at Kelso, Washington, and dredging downstream from the SRS. Local cooperation. Local interests were responsible for provision of all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for the sediment retention structure, dredging disposal areas, and levee improvements. Local interests were also responsible for all alterations and relocations ofbuildings, roads, bridges and other structures or utilities made necessary by implementation of the project. In addition, operation and maintenance of fish facilities, the levee system at Kelso and dredged material disposal sites are the responsibility of local interests. Cowlitz County offers visitor services in their viewpoint area. Nonfederal cash contribution is $3,600,000 and the estimated nonfederal land, easements, right-of-ways, and relocations costs are $21,000,000. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Coordination with Federal and local agencies continued. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance performed. 32. SCAPPOOSE DRAINAGE DISTRICT, OR Location. Scappoose Drainage District is located in Columbia County, Oregon, along the left bank of Multnomah Channel opposite Columbia River Miles 90.3 to 97.0. reconstruction of the existing levee system. Additional improvements, as provided for in the Flood Control Act of May 17, 1950, consisted of raising and strengthening 52,000 feet of levee, construction of toe drains, and additional pumping capacity. The project as originally authorized was completed in 1941. The additional improvements were completed in September 1980. The main pumping plant was constructed by the Corps of Engineers as part of a comprehensive plan for upgrading the flood protection works to provide protection against the Standard Project Flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second as measured at The Dalles, Oregon. This equates to a flood level of 27.8 feet and 26.2 at the upstream and downstream ends, respectively, of the drainage district. The four pumps at the main pumping plant did not operate properly during the February 1996 flood. The problem began when the Columbia River exceeded the ordinary high water level of 14 feet. At that point, the pumps started to overheat and shut down. When the river stage reaches approximately 22.5 feet, the motor overload protection trips out. Emergency measures were taken by rotating the operation of the pumps. All pump motors overheated and only one pump at a time in rotation could be operated. The reduced pumping capability induced interior flooding that caused extensive damage to a large plant nursery, flooded residential properties, and cut off access to interior drainage channel pump stations. The pumps were designed to operate with river stages from +1.0 to 26.6 feet. The river crested at 26.6 feet during the flood. During the February 1996 flood the pumps were tested under major flooding conditions for the first time. Corrective action was to replace the existing pump impellers having a 17 degree pitch with impellers having 14.5 degree pitch. The cost for this corrective action was $119,000, which was 100% Federal. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Replaced pump impellers. 33. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Corps of Engineers monitored flood control operations at four Bureau of Reclamation projects (Prineville, Ochoco, Emigrant, and Scoggins), one local project operated by Douglas County (Galesville), and one municipal power project operated by Tacoma City Light (Mossyrock). The projects were partially constructed with flood control funds, thereby subjecting project operation to monitoring by the Corps of Engineers under Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944. The four Bureau of Reclamation projects, Douglas County project and Mossyrock project were operated during the fiscal year within the flood control regulations specified for each project. Total cost of monitoring the six projects during the fiscal year was $61,703. Project Description. The project, as originally authorized by the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, provided for 28-14 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 34. WILLAMETI'E RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR Location. On Willamette River and tributaries, between Cascade Range and Coast Range, from a point south of Eugene to Portland, OR. Existing project. Provides for clearing, sloping, and reveting riverbanks; construction of pile and timber bulkheads and drift barriers; minor channel improvements; and maintenance of existing works for control of floods and prevention of erosion at various locations along Willamette River and its tributaries. The current scope of the project is a total of 510,000 linear feet of bank protection at 236 locations. Estimated Federal cost is $30,700,000. Construction of project began in 1938 and is 96 percent complete. A total of 489,795 linear feet of bank protection work at 230 locations consisting of revetment of riverbanks, pile and timber bulldheads, drift barriers, and channel improvements, have been completed on Willamette River and tributaries. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 and Section 103, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Estimated costs for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of project authorization were $2,300,000. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Coordination with potential sponsors and evaluation of local erosion problems continued. Maintenance: Continued coordination and evaluation of local erosion problems. 35. WILLOW CREEK LAKE, HEPPNER, OR Location. On Willow Creek immediately upstream from Heppner and just downstream from junction of Balm Fork and Willow Creek in Section 35, Township 2 South, Range 26 East, Willamette Meridian. Existing project. Project provides flood protection to the city of Heppner and downstream area by controlling runoff from a drainage area of 96 square miles. The dam is a roller compacted concrete structure 160 feet high at crest elevation 2,130. Ancillary features include a center uncontrolled spillway with a maximum flood capacity of 93,300 cfs (cubic feet per second), an outlet works with a capacity of 500 cfs, a minor flow works and diversion works. Gross storage capacity of the project is 13,250 acre-feet, consisting of 7,750 acre-feet for exclusive flood control, 1,750 acre-feet for joint flood control and irrigation, 1,750 acre-feet exclusive irrigation, and 2,000 acre-feet dead storage for fish, wildlife, recreation, sediment accumulation, and aesthetics. Limited recreation facilities are being provided. Willow Creek Parks and Recreation District has leased recreation facilities at Willow Creek Lake. A courtesy handling dock was constructed by the Recreation District utilizing Oregon State Marine Board funds. A playfield area below the dam has been leased to the City of Heppner. The final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Environmental Protection Agency on December 20, 1979. The provisions of the Clear Water Act were met by a Section 404(b)(1) Evaluation and a public notice issued January 12, 1980, and a section 401 certification from the State of Oregon on February 15, 1980. Land acquisition is about 99 percent complete. Local cooperation. Development of additional recreation facilities will require a local sponsor willing to cost share and assume all operation and maintenance of facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance performed. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 36. BONNEVILLE LOCKAND DAM - LAKE BONNEVILLE, ORAND WA Location. Project is on Columbia River, 40 miles east of Portland, OR, about 146 miles above mouth of river. For description of Columbia River, see Section 3. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, and lock for power and navigation. Spillway dam extends across main channel from Cascade island shore to Bradford Island. Overflow crest at 24 feet above mean sea level is surmounted by 18 verticallift steel gates, 10 with remote control hoists placed between piers which extend to elevation 99 feet where a service roadway provides access, and two 350-ton gantry cranes for regulating gates. Powerhouse No. 1 extending across Bradford Slough to the Oregon shore has an installation of 10 units, consisting of one unit of 48,000 kilowatts, one unit of 59,500 kilowatts, and eight units of 60,000 kilowatts each, totaling 587,500 kilowatts. Ordinary and extreme fluctuations of river at lower lock gate are about 21 and 47 feet respectively. Project includes fish ladders to serve both main channel, Bradford Slough Channel, and Powerhouse II channel. Navigation lock and powerhouses are founded on andesite, and main dam rests on solidified sedimentary rock of volcanic origin. The pool created by dam provides a navigable channel 27 feet deep between Bonneville and The Dalles Dams, a distance of 47 river miles. Principal data concerning navigation lock, spillway dam, and powerplant are set forth in Table 28-N. Dam, navigation lock, 10-unit power generating installation, fishways, and attendant buildings and grounds cost $83,239,395, of which $6,072,480 is for navigation facilities, $39,350,824 for power facilities and $37,816,091 for joint facilities, consisting of dam, fisbways, buildings and grounds, and headwall section of power units 0 to 6, cost of which $2,106,000 is allocated to dam and lake facilities. In response to flow regulations and peakings from upstream plants operating under conditions of Canadian storage and Pacific Northwest-Southwest Intertie, two modifications were undertaken at the Bonneville project. The modification for peaking project was undertaken to minimize adverse environmental effects under rapidly changing flow conditions from upstream dams. The project was completed in 1978 at a cost of $27,195,000. The second modification provided for increased power installation by building a second powerhouse located on the Washington shore adjacent to the end of the existing spillway. The new powerhouse contains eight units of 66,500 kilowatts each and two fish attraction turbine generator units of 13,100 kilowatts each for a combined capacity of 28-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 558,200 kilowatts, bringing the entire Bonneville capacity to 1,145.7 megawatts. Additional fish facilities consist of the powerhouse collection system, second fish ladder on the Washington shore, transportation channel connecting the Cascade Island fish ladder with new exit control section, and fingerling bypass facilities which include fish screens in both the powerhouses. To provide for the anticipated increased visitor use, onsite visitor facilities are included. Under authority of the Bonneville Project Act (August 20, 1937), a letter from Bonneville Power Administration to North Pacific Division dated January 21, 1965, requested construction of a second powerhouse. Construction ofproject started October 1933, was completed February 1943. Modification of powerhouse control equipment started March 1957, was completed September 1958. First two power units were placed in operation during fiscal year 1938. Powerhouse with complete installation of 10 units, was in operation December 1943. Construction of modification for peaking work commenced in September 1970 and was completed in September 1978. Construction of second powerhouse complete. Final environmental impact statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality inApril 1972. In response to increasing visitation which now exceeds 800,000 a year at the dam site itself and 2,700,000 project wide, a visitor center with windows into the fish ladders, a 60-seat theatre, exhibits and displays was completed in 1975. Units 11 through 18 were on-line by October, 1982. The visitor facility for the new powerhouse (which does not require cost-sharing) is an integral part of that structure. The total cost for construction of the second powerhouse is $678,945,000. In June 1993 work began on the rehabilitation of the First Powerhouse. In the first phase the existing circuit breakers and ten transformers were replaced and the switchyard was rehabilitated. Circuit breaker work was completed in 1995. The remaining work was completed in 1997. Phase I cost was $24,120,000. The second phase consists of replacing the windings of five generators and replacing ten turbines. Second phase work was contracted in 1994 and is scheduled to be completed in 2005. Phase II will cost an estimated $104,600,000. The first powerhouse, spillway, navigation lock and associated facilities have been designated as a National Historic District. Development of recreation facilities at Home Valley was completed in FY 1989. Through September 1998, power generation totaled 250.5 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $658.9 million was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required, except for non-federal cost-sharing for development of recreational facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Real estate actions regarding highway, railroad, and City of North Bonneville relocations were completed. The remaining deeds were officially turned over to the City of North Bonneville. Maintenance: Increased activities to protect and enhance the anadromous fisheries in the Northwest were performed. Repair of Unit 15 stator winding and rewedge repairs were initiated September 16, 1998. Initiated navigation lock gate retensioning. Routine operation and maintenance was performed with enhanced maintenance on the turbines. During the fiscal year 5,463,398,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated, of which 5,434,595,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Major Rehabilitation: A contract to rehabilitate the generators and turbines in the first powerhouse is in progress. 37. COLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION, OR AND WA Location. At Bonneville, The Dalles, and John Day Dams on the Columbia River in the states of Oregon and Washington. This project encompasses work at five other locations within Walla Walla District. Existing project. The eight Corps hydroelectric projects on the lower Columbia and Snake Rivers have been identified as a major contributing factor in causing mortality to migrating salmon and steelhead. Without adequate bypass facilities to guide juvenile fish away from the power turbines at the dams, mortalities incurred through project passage severely impact the commercial, recreational, and Indian fisheries. The Corps has recognized the need to reduce juvenile mortality and has undertaken bypass measures that include mechanized fish bypass systems with barge and truck transportation. Spill as an additional bypass route over the spillways has been used to divert fish from entering turbine units, but it is a signi ficant adverse economic factor due to lost power revenues. Congress passed and the President signed the FY 1989 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act (PL 100-371) which mandated the expenditure of funds for the design, testing, and construction of new or improved fish bypass facilities for the Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation projects. Completion of the bypass and transportation facilities will significantly increase the survival of migrating downstream juvenile fish. The mitigation study will determine the overall scope of the juvenile and adult fish bypass facilities for these Columbia and Snake River dams. The plan of improvement within Portland District includes the following: (a) Bonneville - new juvenile fish monitoring facilities, and outfall relocation; (b) The Dalles - submerged extended fish screens and bypass system, new gantry crane and maintenance facility; (c) John Day - new juvenile fish monitoring facility, and planning and design for potential drawdown of the reservoir to minimum operating pool; (d) a mitigation study that analyzes long-term alternatives including surface bypass technology, gas abatement and improved turbine passage to improve fish passage and survival through Corps dams on the Columbia and Snake Rivers. 28-16 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT The current fully funded total estimated Federal project cost is $1,386,000,000 which includes $778,400,000 for improvements in Walla Walla District, $597,817,000 in Portland District and $9,783,000 provided by the Bonneville Power Administration for design of the Bonneville juvenile fish monitoring facility. For information on the planned improvements in the upper Columbia and Snake Rivers, see Walla Walla District's Annual Report. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: General: Continued to collect biological and hydraulic data at all projects, and develop alternatives to improve existing anadromous fish bypass methodology and systems, to reduce excess dissolved gas entrainment associated with use of the spillways and to improve turbine passage survival. Bonneville Dam: Continued construction of new juvenile bypass outfall for the second powerhouse. Also awarded a contract for construction of bypass improvements inside the powerhouse, a transportation flume to the new outfall and juvenile fish monitoring facility. Performed biological analysis of a surface collection prototype system and extended length screens at the first powerhouse. The Dalles Dam: Continued sluiceway and spillway juvenile survival studies in conjunction with development of future bypass system alternatives. Developed alternatives for relocating sluiceway outfall and for provision of emergency auxiliary water for adult fishways. John Day Dam: completed of construction of a new juvenile fish monitoring facility. Completed construction of spillway flow deflectors in bays 2- 19. Continued testing of extended length (40 ft.) bypass screens for potential replacement of existing 20 ft. screens associated with the existing juvenile bypass system. 38. COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY FISHING ACCESS SITES, OR & WA Location. This project provides for construction of 31 sites along the Columbia River on Bonneville pool, John Day pool, and The Dalles pool. Existing project. Congress has provided authority through public law to implement a wide range of land management, transfer, acquisition and development actions to provide fishing access for Indian tribes who exercise treaty fishing rights on the Columbia River. The law designates certain federal sites on Bonneville, John Day, and The Dalles pools for fishing access. The improvements required at the access sites are specified in the authorizing legislation. They will include all weather access roads, camping facilities, boat ramps, docks, sanitation, and fish cleaning facilities. Construction of these facilities will greatly improve access by the four tribes which have fishing rights along this reach of the Columbia River. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Land acquisition and work on plans and specifications for Phase II sites continued. Construction of the second phase sites continued. 39. COUGAR LAKE, OR Location. At mile 4.4 on South Fork McKenzie River which joins McKenzie River about 56.5 miles above its confluence with Willamette River. Project is about 42 miles east of Eugene, OR. Existing project. A rockfill dam with an impervious earth core, about 1,738 feet long at crest and 445 feet high above the streambed. Reservoir is 6 miles long with storage capacity at full pool of 219,000 acre-feet and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 210 square miles. Spillway is on right abutment and outlet and power tunnels in left abutment. Outlet tunnel is provided with a chute and stilling basin. Powerplant consists of two 12,500 kilowatt units with minimum provisions for installing a third unit of 35,000 kilowatts for future peaking capacity. Improvement functions as a unit in coordinated system of reservoirs for multiple-purpose development of water resources in Willamette River Basin. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service. Also authorized (but unconstructed) is a reregulating dam, Strube Lake, below Cougar Lake, which would permit Cougar to operate as a peaking powerplant. The Strube dam would contain two units totalling 4,600 kilowatts. Estimated Federal cost of Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Units is $114,000,000. Construction of project initiated June 1956 is complete, excluding Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit for which planning is essentially complete. Also, plans and specifications for the first construction contract (relocations) have been completed. Generating units 1 and 2 were placed in commercial operation March 23 and February 4, 1964, respectively. Physical in-service date for flood control was November 29, 1963. Through September 1998 power generation totaled 4.6 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville PowerAdministration, $26.3 million was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. The addition of water temperature control to the intake tower is authorized. Water temperature control will enhance fish passage and incubation in the McKenzie River. Work on the PreEngineering and Design Phase continued. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Preparation of plans and specifications for the intake tower modifications continue. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year, 146,313,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project, of which 145,525,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Cougar Lake on South Fork McKenzie River are shown on Table 28-K. 28-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 40. DETROIT LAKE - BIG CLIFF, OR Location. On North Santiam River with dam 50 miles from mouth 40 miles southeast of Salem, OR. North Santiam River flows north and west for 85 miles, and unites with South Santiam River to form Santiam River, which 10 miles downstream enters Willamette River 108 miles above its mouth. Existing project. Main dam and a reregulating dam, both with power-generating facilities. Detroit Dam is a concrete gravity structure about 1,522 feet long and 454 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to roadway deck. Spillway is a gate-controlled overflow section, and outlet works are gate-controlled conduits through dam. Powerhouse with two units having a capacity of 50,000 kilowatts each is in right abutment immediately below dam. Reservoir has a storage capacity at full pool of 454,900 acre-feet and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 438 square miles. It is being operated as a unit in coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette Valley from floods, to increase low water flows in interest of navigation and irrigation, to generate power, and for other purposes. Reregulating dam 3 miles downstream at Big Cliff site is concrete gravity type, about 191 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to roadway deck. Power installation consists of one unit with a capacity of 18,000 kilowatts. Reservoir has a storage capacity of 5,930 acre-feet at full pool. Project is a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Willamette Basin. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service, Oregon State Park System and the town of Detroit. Construction of project begun in May 1947 was completed December 1960. The two powerhouse generating units were placed in commercial operation June and October 1953. At Big Cliff powerhouse, single generating unit was placed online June 1954. Use of Big Cliff Dam for reregulating fluctuating flow from Detroit units was effected October 1953. Through September 1998 power generation totaled 22.0 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $78.8 million was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Completed contracts to reroofBig Cliff and Detroit Powerhouses. During fiscal year 489,569,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project of which 486,726,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by the Detroit Lake project on North Santiam River are shown in Table 28-K. 41. GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OR Location. At approximate mile 5.5 on Middle Santiam River which joins South Santiam River about 56.8 miles above its confluence with Willamette River. Darn is about 30 miles southeast of Albany in Linn County, OR. Existing project. Main dam and a reregulating dam, both with power-generating facilities. Green Peter Dam is a concrete gravity structure, 1,400 feet long and 385 feet high above the lowest point of the general foundation with a gate-controlled spillway. Outlet works consist of two conduits through spillway, discharging into a stilling basin. Powerplant, on right bank adjacent to spillway stilling basin, consists of two units with an installed capacity of 80,000 kilowatts. Reservoir provides storage capacity at full pool of 430,000 acre-feet, extending 6.5 miles up Quartzville Creek and some 7.5 miles up Middle Santiam River above creek junction, forming a Y-shaped pool. Reservoir controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 277 square miles. Foster Dam, 7 miles downstream from Green Peter Dam is located on South Santiam River about 38 miles above its confluence with Santiam River and 1.5 miles below its confluence with Middle Santiam River. Foster Dam consists of an earth, gravel, and rock-filled embankment, 146 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation and a concrete gravity gate controlled spillway and stilling basin for a total length of 4,800 feet. Power installation consists of two units with capacity of 20,000 kilowatts. Foster Lake has a storage capacity, at full pool, of 61,000 acre-feet. Project functions as a unit in coordinated system of reservoirs for multiple-purpose development of water resources in Willamette River Basin. All construction on Green Peter-Foster Lakes project initiated June 1961 is completed. Green Peter Lake was placed in operation for useful flood control June 1967 as a unit of coordinated reservoir system for protection of the Willamette River Basin. First power-generation unit was placed on the line June 9, 1967 and second, June 28, 1967. Use of Foster Lake for reregulating fluctuating flows from Green Peter units was effective December 1967. First power generation unit was placed on-line August 22, 1968 and second, September 6, 1968. Through September 1998 power generation totaled 10.7 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this powerby Bonneville PowerAdministration, $66.2 million was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. Future recreation development at Foster or Green Peter will require cost sharing. Recreation facilities at Foster Lake includes 4 parks and 2 parks at Green Peter Lake. Five of these parks were developed by the Corps and are operated by Linn county under lease agreement. One park is operated by the Corps. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Rewind Unit 1 initiated September 16, 1998. Estimated completion September 1999. During the fiscal year 354,716,000 kilowatt-hours ofelectrical energy were generated at project of which 293,397,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Green Peter Lake project on Middle Santiam River are shown in Table 28-K. 28-18 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 42. HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR Location. On the Middle Fork, Willamette River, 47.8 miles from mouth and 26.5 miles upstream from Lookout Point Dam. Middle Fork, Willamette River rises on west slope of Cascade Range and flows northwesterly to its junction with Coast Fork, Willamette River. Dam is about 45 miles southeast from Eugene, OR. Existing project. An earth-and-gravel-fill dam about 2,150 feet long at the crest and 338 feet above lowest point of the general foundation. A gate-controlled concrete gravity chutetype spillway is in right abutment. Diversion tunnel, outlet tunnel and power tunnel are in same abutment. Powerhouse with two 15,000 kilowatt units is located next to spillway. Hills Creek Lake is about 8.5 miles long and provides storage capacity at full pool of 356,000 acre-feet. Project controls runoff of drainage area of 389 square miles and is an integral unit of comprehensive plan for development of water resources of Willamette River Basin. Hills Creek Lake and Lookout Point Lake are operated as a unit for control of floods and generation of power on Middle Fork Willamette River. These projects, in conjunction with Dexter reregulating dam and Fall Creek Lake flood control system, will effectively control floods on Middle Fork and provide maximum efficient generation of hydroelectric power. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service. Hills Creek power units are remote controlled from Lookout Point. Construction of project, initiated May 1956, was completed June 1963. The project was placed in service for useful flood control in November 1961. On May 2, 1962, the two power units were placed on-line. Through September 1998, power generation totaled 5.7 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $24.3 million was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year, 170,903,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project, of which 170,282,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Hills Creek Lake on Middle Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 28-K. 43. JOHN DAY LOCKAND DAM - LAKE UMATILLA, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River about 3 miles downstream from mouth of John Day River and about 215 miles above mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladders, and appurtenant facilities with a slack-water lake about 75 miles long extending to McNary Lock and Dam. Included is relocation ofrailroads, highways, utilities, and communities affected by the impoundment. The project as originally authorized would have provided 2,000,000 acre-feet of flood control storage. As modified, the projectprovides 500,000 acrefeet of flood control storage between elevations 257 and 268. The structure is 5,900 feet in length and stands about 161 feet above streambed. Powerhouse has space for 20 generating units of 135,000 kilowatts each; 16 units have been installed for a present capacity of 2,160,000 kilowatts. Principal project data are set forth in Table 28-N. A detailed description of project as authorized and modified is on pages 1992 and 1993 of Annual Report for 1962 under the Walla Walla District. Construction began July 1958 and the project was opened to navigation April 1968. The main dam contract is complete. Lock rehabilitation work begun in FY 1980 was completed in FY 1986. Through September 1998 power generation totaled 314.8 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $455.3 million was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. Recreation facilities at 5 parks are operated and maintained by local agencies under lease agreement with the Corps. Six developed recreation areas are operated and maintained by the Corps of Engineers. Any future recreation development will require cost sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Increased activities to protect and enhance the anadromous fisheries in the Northwest were performed. Construction and implementation of the synchronous condensing units were completed under the 2406 program. Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 10,435,827,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power were generated by the 16 generating units of which 10,415,769,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Rehabilitation: Final major contract for rewinding of 5 generators continued and is scheduled for FY 2000 completion. 44. LOOKOUT POINT - DEXTER LAKES, OR Location. On Middle Fork, Willamette River at Meridian site, 21.3 miles from mouth. Middle Fork, Willamette River, rises in Lane County on western slope of Cascade Range and flows northwesterly to its junction with Coast Fork, which is head of mainstem Willamette River. Dam is about 22 miles southeast from Eugene, OR. Existing project. A main dam at Meridian site and a reregulating dam 3 miles downstream at Dexter site. Both dams are earth-and-gravel-fills with concrete spillways and have power generating facilities. Main dam is 258 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to deck and is 3,381 feet long at crest forming a reservoir 14.2 miles long providing storage of 456,000 acre-feet at full-pool level. Reservoir controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 991 square miles. Spillway, 274 feet long, is a gate-controlled overflow type, forming right abutment. Outlet works consisting of slide-gatecontrolled conduits pass through spillway section. Powerhouse has three main generating units with a capacity of 120,000 kilowatts. Dexter reregulating dam has a maximum height of 28-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 107 feet above lowest point of the general foundation and is 2,765 feet long at crest, forming a full pool of 27,500 acre-feet extending upstream to main dam and providing pondage to regulate Lookout Point powerhouse water releases to a uniform discharge. Spillway consists of a gate-controlled overflow section 509 feet long forming right abutment. Flow regulation is accomplished by use of spillway gates and releases through powerhouse, which contains one 15,000- kilowatt unit. Lookout Point and Dexter Lakes are operated as a single unit of a coordinated system of reservoirs to protect Willamette River Valley against floods, to provide needed hydroelectric power, and to increase low water flows for navigation, irrigation, and other purposes. Existing project authorized as a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Willamette River Basin. Construction of project initiated May 1947 was completed June 1961, except for construction of additional recreation facilities funded through the Code 710 program. Future recreation facilities will be provided in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane County and will require a 50 percent contribution by Lane County and is subject to funding availability by the Government and the County. At Lookout Point powerhouse, generating units 1,2, and 3 were placed in commercial operation December 1954, February 1955, and April 1955, respectively. At Dexter powerhouse the single unit was placed on-line May 1955. Dexter was placed in operation for reregulation in December 1954. Through September 1998 power generation totaled 17.5 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville PowerAdministration, $88.2 million was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. A multiple project cost sharing agreement has been in force with Lane County since September 1976. It includes 4 projects and 13 parks. All these parks are managed by Lane County under lease agreement. Recreation opportunities are provided at 2 parks on Dexter Lake which are operated by Lane County via the multi-project cost-sharing agreement and lease instruments. The north shore of Lookout Point Lake is also leased to Lane County for recreation purposes; there is essentially no development. Future development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract work to supply new generator windings for Lookout Point and Dexter due to complete in FY99. Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 348,559,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated at project of which 346,514,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Lookout Point Lake project on Middle Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 28-K. 45. LOST CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Existing project. A rock and gravel-fill embankment dam about 327 feet high from streambed to crest, with an overall length of 3,750 feet with an impervious earth core and a gatecontrolled concrete spillway. Powerhouse is on right abutment and houses two Francis-type turbines with installed capacity of 24,500 kilowatts each. Regulating outlet facility was provisions for temperature regulation for releases in interest of fishery enhancement is also on right bank. Reservoir 10 miles long provides 315,000 acre-feet of usable storage. Project provides control of runoff of drainage area of 674 square miles. In addition to hydroelectric power generation, project provides flood control, irrigation, future municipal and industrial (M&I) water supply, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control and recreation benefits. Construction of project initiated July 1967 is complete. Generating units 1 and 2 were placed in commercial operation July 6 and July 13, 1977, respectively. Physical in-service date for flood control was February 18, 1977. Final environmental statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in June 1972. Recreation opportunities are provided by 4 parks at the project. The State of Oregon operates 2 parks, including a 200 unit campground, part of Stewart State Park. Through September 1998, power generation totaled 6.1 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $34.9 million was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. Authorizing act required that local agencies furnish assurances prior to construction that demands will be made for future use of water supply storage within a period that will permit repayment of costs, including interest, allocated to water supply within life of the project; that State of Oregon take action, prior to construction to insure maintenance in stream of flows to be released for fishery; in addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in manner and to an extent consistent with reclamation laws and policies; and costs allocated to power will be repaid on a system basis by revenue from sales of power in Pacific Northwest Federal system by Bonneville PowerAdministration. A survey in September, 1980 of M&I water supply needs showed nine communities with water supply needs. A contract for M&I supply has been completed with one of the communities. Assurances for municipal and industrial water supply were obtained from six communities in Rogue River Valley. On February 26, 1966 Oregon State Department of Fish and Wildlife agreed to operate Cole M. Rivers Fish Hatchery for mitigation and enhancement of fish. The Corps provides full funding for the operation and maintenance of the hatchery. The hatchery became operational in 1972. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 339,134,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated by the project of which 335,403,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Lost Creek Lake on Rogue River are shown in Table 28-K. Location. On Upper Rogue River at mile 153.6 about 30 miles northeasterly from Medford, OR. 28-20 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 46. THE DALLES LOCKAND DAM - LAKE CELILO, WAAND OR Location. On Columbia River at head of pool behind Bonneville Dam, about 192 miles above mouth of river and 88 miles east of Portland, OR. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, navigation lock, and appurtenant facilities. Improvement provides for navigation and hydroelectric power generation. Dam is designed for a normal pool at elevation 160 feet at mean sea level. Normal pool forms a reservoir extending upstream about 23 miles providing slackwater to John Day Dam site. The Dalles Dam is 8,700 feet long and consists of a rock, gravel, and sand river closure section from Oregon shore connecting to a nonoverflow section which in turn joins powerhouse, then concrete nonoverflow sections connecting spillway with powerhouse and spillway with navigation lock at right abutment on Washington shore. Fish-passing facilities including two ladders and a fish lock are provided. Powerhouse was constructed for 14 units initially with substructure for eight additional units, an ultimate total of 22 units. Initial installation, excluding two 13,500 kilowatt fish-water units, is 1,092,000 kilowatts. With eight units installed for a capacity of 687,800 kilowatts. The total generating capacity is 1,806,800 kilowatts. Structures are founded on Columbia River basalt. Principal data concerning lock, spillway, and powerhouse are set forth in Table 28-N. Major construction of project initiated February 1952, was completed October 1960 when unit No. 14 was placed in commercial operation. Initial contract for additional units 15- 22 was awarded in September 1967. Additional 8-unit phase was completed when unit 22 was placed in commercial operation in November 1973. Basic recreation facilities were developed with construction funds at 4 parks on Lake Celilo. These parks were further expanded with code 710 funds in the late 60's and early 70's. Two parks are operated by Washington State Park Commission under a lease agreement. Studies for adding power generation facilities to the North Shore Fish LadderAuxiliary Water supply System were initiated in October 1979 and completed in December 1980. These facilities would provide baseload generation (3.5 megawatts) and would not impact the present operation of the North Fish Ladder. However, it was determined that it was not within the Chief of Engineer's authority to add these power facilities. A local interest, North Wasco County Public Utility District pursued the construction of these power facilities through the FERC license processes and awarded a construction contract in September 1989. Seufert Visitor Center was completed in September 1980. In October 1996 work began on major rehabilitation of powerhouse units 1-14. Work includes rewind of nine generators, replacement of blades on twelve turbine units, refurbishment of blades on two turbine units, and refurbishment of two bridge cranes. The total cost for major rehabilitation is estimated at $94,000,000 with completion in September 2007. Through September 1998, power generation totaled 291.7 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $417.3 million was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. Further recreation development will require cost sharing and assumption of operation and maintenance by local, non-federal sponsor. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Construction and implementation of synchronous condensing units were completed under the 2406 program. Increased activities to protect and enhance the anadromous fisheries in the Northwest were performed. Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 7,366,367,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated at project of which 7,349,409,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Major Rehabilitation: Initiated rewind of Unit 2. Completed rewind of Unit 11. Initiated work on the bridge cranes. Continued preparation of plans and specifications for the main unit contract. Exercised option for two excitors. Work Under Special Authorities 47. PROJECTS NOT SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED A. Continuing Authorities Program (CAP): General Requirements: Individual projects have specific requirements pursuant to the statutes which provide their authorization. In general, however, each project selected must be complete in itself, technically feasible, economically justified, environmentally acceptable, and limited to a federal statutory cost. The local sponsor must agree to provide without cost to the Department of Army, all lands, easements, and rights-ofway, including highway, highway bridge, and utility relocations and alterations required for project construction; provide a cash contribution; operate, maintain, repair, replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion; hold and save the Department of the Army free from damages arising from the construction, operation, and maintenance of the completed project; and assume all project costs in excess of the federal statutory cost limit. Specific requirements by statute for the authorization of each type of CAP project are discussed in detail.below. See Table 28-L for expenditures under CAP during the fiscal year. Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107 of the 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act, Public Law 645, 86th Congress, as Amended: In addition to the above general requirements, each project selected is limited to a federal statutory cost of not more than $4,000,000. The local sponsor must agree to provide an amount, in cash, not less than 10 percent or more than 50 percent of total project cost for navigation depending upon the planned depth of channel or basin; pay an additional 10 percent of the construction costs in cash over a period not to exceed 30 years after project completion. The non-federal sponsor must also agree to provide, maintain, and operate an adequate public parking, landing or wharf, service facilities, berthing areas, floats, pier, slips and similar marina and mooring facilities. The remaining portion of the project, such as the access channel or breakwater structure, is maintained by the Corps of Engineers at Federal expense within a limited amount. Federal 28-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 expenditures for operation and maintenance under the Section 107 authority are administratively limited to the greater of $4,500,000, or 2.25 times the Federal costs of the project including costs for the feasibility through the construction phases. One project is under construction as follows: Newport, OR: Location. The project is located at Newport in Lincoln County, Oregon, parallel to the north shore of Yaquina Bay. Yaquina Bay is located on the Oregon Coast, 113 miles south of the Columbia River mouth and 87 miles north of Coos Bay. Project Description. The existing timber breakwater was constructed in 1946 to provide wave and surge protection for moorage facilities in the North Marina. Although severe storms have cause some damaged to the breakwater, it still provides protection to boats in the marina. However, waves enter the North Marina through the western end and cause damage to vessels and dock facilities. Existing docks and commercial fishing boats need additional protection against wave and tidal surge entering from the west entrance. This project consists of constructing a 180-foot rubblemound extension to the existing Federal Breakwater. The crest elevation is 15 feet, mean lower low water (MLLW) with side slopes of 2-vertical to 3-horizontal. The foundation depth of the structure will vary from -12 to -20 MLLW. The alignment of the new structure will extend from the existing breakwater to the northwest and provide a 125-foot entrance into the marina. Waves will be reduced from 2.8 feet to 1.3 feet at the westernmost dock (#3) for a one percent probability of exceedence. Waves at Dock (#5) will also be reduced. The estimated cost for preparation of plans and specifications and construction of the project is $1,421,740, of which $1,299,500 is federal and $122,240 cash non-federal. Local cooperation. The Port of Newport, Oregon, the nonfederal sponsor, executed a Project Cooperation Agreement with the Corps of Engineers on April 23, 1997. Operations during fiscal year. A contract for construction of the project was awarded on July 29, 1997 and was completed in fiscal year 1998. Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as Amended: In addition to the above general requirements, each project selected is limited to a federal statutory cost of not more than $5,000,000. The local sponsor must agree to provide an amount not less than 25 percent or more than 50 percent of total project cost, at least 5 percent of which will be cash; and operate, maintain, repair, replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion. One project was under construction as follows: Peninsula Drainage District No.1, OR: Location. Peninsula Drainage District is located in Portland, Oregon along the Columbia River near river mile 106. Project Description. The Peninsula Drainage District is surrounded by 6.8 miles of levees, flood walls, and railroad and highway embankments. The weak links in the flood protect works are the railroad embankment and the outlet pipe of the pumping plant located on the Columbia Slough levee. The project consists of reinforcing the flood protective system in order to protect against the 100-year reoccurrence frequency flood event. This will be accomplished by reinforcing 2,000 linear feet of the landward side of the railroad embankment at the southwest corner of the drainage district and raising the outlet pipes of the pumping station to above-design flood level of 28.7 feet Portland Datum. The railroad embankment will be reinforced by constructing a sand embankment structure against the landward slope of the railroad embankment having a 12-foot wide crown and 1 vertical to 5 horizontal side slopes. The catch point along a portion of this fill is in a golf course water hazard and the embankment will cover existing golf course tees. As a consequence, a 200 linear foot gabion retaining wall will confine the fill and allow construction of a flat bench so the tees can be re- established. The height of the retaining wall will vary from 2 to 9 feet. The estimated cost for preparation of plans and specifications and construction of the project is $1,484,000, of which $1,113,000 is federal and 371,000 is non-federal. Local cooperation. The Peninsula Drainage District Number 1, Oregon, the non-federal sponsor, signed a Project Cooperation Agreement on July 3, 1997. Operationsduring fiscal year. A contract for construction of the project was awarded on September 29, 1997 and was physically completed in September 1998. Emergency Streambank Protection Activities Pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as Amended: In addition to the general requirements, each project selected is limited to a federal statutory expenditure of not more than $500,000 in any one year. The local sponsor must agree to provide an amount not less than 25 percent or more than 50 percent of total project cost, at least 5 percent of which will be cash; and operate, maintain, repair, replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion. B. Modifications to Structures and Operations of Constructed Corps Projects to Improve the Quality of the Environment, Pursuant to Section 1135 of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act, Public Law 662, 99th Congress, as Amended. The Section 1135 program provides the authority for the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers to modify existing civil works projects to restore the environment. A non-federal entity is required to sponsor the project. The project must accomplish restoration by modifying a Corps project or operation of a Corps project, or be located on Corps project lands. The project must be feasible and consistent with the authorized purpose. The 28-22 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT non-federal sponsor generally must assume responsibility of the operation and maintenance associated with the project. Planning studies, detailed design, and construction costs are shared by the Corps 75 percent and non-federal sponsor 25 percent. Total project costs cannot exceed $5 million with the federal share limited to $3,750,000 without specific congressional authorization. See Table 28-L for expenditures under Section 1135 during the fiscal year. Two projects are under construction as follows: Coos Bay Western Snowy Plover Habitat Restoration, OR: Location: The project modification is located on the North Spit of Coos Bay, adjacent to river mile 2 of the Coos River. The Coos River Entrance is located on the southern Oregon coast, approximately 200 miles south of the Columbia River. Project Description. The coastal population of the western snowy plover in California, Oregon, and Washington, listed as federally threatened in 1993, has declined primarily because of loss of open beach habitats caused by the spread of European beachgrass. The Coos Bay North Spit has provided the most important remnant breeding habitat for western snowy plovers on the Oregon coast. European beachgrass was introduced for sand stabilization in the early 1900's and is the dominant vegetation on much of the Oregon coast including the Coos Bay North Spit. The project restores western snowy plover habitat and reintroduces pink sandverbena, a native plant species. European beachgrass will be eradicated by irrigation with salt water, cultivation, application of herbicide, and prescribed fire on approximately 71 acres on Coos Bay North spit. A fence will be constructed to limit predation and restrict human and vehicular access to the project area. The estimated total project cost, including planning and design, is $224,000, of which $168,000 is federal and $56,000 is non-federal. Local cooperation. The sponsor, the Oregon International Port of Coos Bay, signed a Project Cooperation Agreement on April 11, 1996. Operations during fiscal year. Construction of the project was initiated on May 16, 1996 and is schedule to be completed in the third quarter of fiscal year 1998. Trestle Bay Restoration, OR: Location. The modification is located at river mile 7 on the Columbia River. Project Description. The project consists of lowering (removal) of a 500 foot section of the Columbia River South Jetty to -5.6 mean sea level. The lowered section allows for unimpeded access by fisheries resources to 603 acres of intertidal habitat and increases nutrient availability for the support populations of estuarine, marine, and anadromous fish stocks. Construction was completed on September 25, 1995, except for post construction monitoring which is scheduled to continue through fiscal year 1998. The modifications will not increase the operation, maintenance, repair, replacement and rehabilitation cost for the Columbia River at the Mouth navigation project. The total cost for this modification, including all design and construction is estimated at $237,650, of which $178,240 is federal and $59,410 is non-federal. Excluded is the costs for the feasibility report which was prepared under the authority of Section 216 of the Rivers and Harbors Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611, and for which funding was provided in the Energy and Water Appropriations Act of 1994, Public Law 103-126. Local Cooperation. The non-federal sponsor, the State of Oregon Parks and Recreation Department signed a Project Cooperation Agreement on May 24, 1995. Operations during fiscal year. Fiscal closeout. 48. EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACTIVITIES PROGRAM Disaster Preparedness Program. This program encompasses all the activities associated with preparedness (including publication of plans and policy documents), exercises, training, coordination with outside agencies and governments, maintaining supplies and equipment, and the like. Significant activities included a briefing to all employees on district's Earthquake Response Plan, and an emergency communications exercise for branch chiefs. This exercise included hands-on radio training, and an exercise conducted at assembly areas, which required the setup and operation of HF/ SSB radios. Public law 84-99. FY 1998 was a relatively quiet flood year, with no significant flood response activities. The district accomplished one post-flood activity on the Millicoma River in Coos County, to remove a logjam that threatened a highway bridge. Continuing Eligibility Inspections. The district completed all scheduled annual inspections of flood control works. As part of these inspections, sector engineers discussed and gave advice to local sponsors regarding their local flood plans and application of Public Law 84-99 as it pertains to them. Catastrophic Disaster Response Planning. This initiative was begun in FY98. It requires that a comprehensive set of Operations Plans be developed to cope with a subduction earthquake off the Oregon/Washington coast in the Richter range of 8 to 8.5. The district has begun planning for this event in coordination with several other Corps commands. See Table 28-M for expenditures during the fiscal year. General Investigations 49. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $1,943,811 of which $863,270 was for navigation studies, $70,125 for flood damage prevention studies, $70,668 for Environmental Services Partnerships, 28-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 $366,110 for comprehensive studies, $362,461 for miscellaneous activities, and $211,177 for coordination with other agencies. Contributed funds in the amount of $875,540 were expended of which $494,874 was contributed by the Association of Lower Columbia River Ports for the Columbia River Channel Deepening Study, $190,144 was contributed by the State of Oregon for the Willamette River Basin Review study, and $190,522 was contributed for the PlanningAssistance to States Program. 50. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management services. Flood Plain Management Services Program comes under Section 206 of the 1960 Flood Control Act, PL 86-645, as amended. Through technical services and planning guidance, the program encourages comprehensive flood plain management planning at all levels to reduce the potential for losses to life and property from floods. Federal and non-Federal agencies and the private sector are assisted with planning and development information for flood hazard areas. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain regulations, Federal Insurance Program requirements, and Executive Order 11988 guidelines. Such assistance may include factual flood information (available or determined) and interpretation on flood frequencies, extent of flooding, floodwater velocity, duration of flooding and floodway limits. Fiscal year costs totaling $141,449 were associated with the following tasks under the Flood Plain Management Services Program: FPMS Unit $31,117; Technical Services $19,948; Quick Responses $4,369; National Flood Proof Committee $2,964; and special studies $83,051. Contributed funds in the amount of$1,658 were expended for Flood Plain Management Services. 51. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Willamette River Temperature Control, OR The project plan consists of improving downstream water temperatures by modifying the existing intake towers at Cougar and Blue River projects. Restoring pre-project temperatures will improve survival rates and increase populations of three important native fish species: the wild stock of Willamette spring chinook salmon, the bull trout, and the rainbow trout. These fisheries once provided important recreational and commercial benefits to the region. Preconstruction engineering and design is estimated to cost $3,870,000 and be completed by September 1999. The construction phase is estimated to cost approximately $70.6 million. Continued design and geotechnical explorations work in support of the intake tower modifications. Fiscal year expenditures were $573,554. 28-24 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 to In Text Sep.30, 1998 1. Bonneville Navigation Lock, Bonneville Dam, OR and WA (Federal Funds) (Inland Waterway Trust Fund) 2. Chetco River, OR 3. Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers Below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA 5. Columbia River Between Chinook, WA, and Head of Sand Island 6. Columbia River at The Mouth, OR and WA 7. Columbia River Between Vancouver,WA and The Dalles, OR 8. Columbia River, Seafarers Memorial, Hammond, OR New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 1,605,000 275,000 250,000 1,945,123 265,846 459,423 1,605,000 275,000 250,000 1,945,123 265,846 353,704 17,500 34,063 17,500 30,558 385,000 350,000 400,000 426,000 833,173 463,980 393,612 432,929 10,691,000 17,039,000 22,278,000 14,280,550 11,475,425 17,041,834 20,387,161 14,105,152 -27,000 -13,912 6,000 1,599 774,000 882,000 638,715 1,037,172 14,000 17,973 13,000 12,526 4,000 4,646 4,000 7,733 4,760,000 6,651,000 2,880,000 6,325,000 4,852,373 6,661,664 3,006,465 6,307,009 207,000 247,000 636,000 657,000 236,752 249,834 635,048 657,103 175,446,807 50 175,430,385 50 175,446,500 175,426,574 2,043,713 1 2,043,713 1 9,797,673 9,796,356 28,349,304 2 28,349,304 2 390,402,846 3 388,305,845 3 665,954 4 665,954 4 941,252 941,252 4,660,087 4,659,957 220,283 5 220,283 5 7,624,877 7,624,132 24,913,661 6 24,913,661 6 159,840,853 7 159,820,639 7 7,322,878 7,322,878 5,989,509 8 5,989,509 8 14,905,359 9 14,903,395 ' 150,000 52,024 9. Coos Bay, OR (Federal Funds) New Work Approp. Cost 2,860,000 4,407,000 849,000 2,810,065 4,413,093 24,288 28-25 37,866,092 10 36,997,538 10 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 28-A (CONTINUED) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 to In Text Sep.30, 1998 (Contributed Funds) 10. Coquille River, OR 11. Depoe Bay, OR 12. Port Orford, OR 14. Rogue River Harbor At Gold Beach, OR 15. Siuslaw River, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 16. Skipanon Channel, OR Maint Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Contrib Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost524 4,426,000 2,545,000 3,006,000 3,181,000 4,403,212 2,635,306 3,018,236 3,182,478 1,133,000 1,730,000 637,000 1,131,911 1,724,174 47,439 223,000 154,000 329,000 127,000 230,600 160,933 325,948 130,912 -12,000 43,000 6,611 39,365 3,000 10,925 32,000 30,512 342,000 495,000 411,000 509,000 450,372 465,941 439,767 511,626 1,032,000 1,007,000 898,000 1,072,000 1,031,808 998,183 909,712 993,486 427,000 420,000 198,000 283,000 468,581 394,964 230,940 279,350 117,000 41,000 132,000 189,000 116,756 15,893 158,565 189,237 108,910,718 " 108,906,097 " 2,335,966 2,335,966 3,986,680 3,390,204 693,366 12 693,366 12 8,730,987 13 8,730,691 13 367,364 367,364 1,747,717 1,744,500 758,692 14 758,692 14 6,414,217 6,409,716 4,156,252 15 4,156,252 '5 19,199,394 16 19,112,707 16 635,783 635,783 29,502,212 17 29,502,212 17 17,000,384 18 16,994,605 '8 879,285 879,285 493,611 493,611 280,854 280,854 3,984,064 3,983,222 28-26 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-A (CONTINUED) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 to In Text Sep.30, 1998 17. Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR 18. Umpqua River, OR 19. Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR 20. Yaquina Bay and Harbor, OR 21. Yaquina River, OR 22. Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin OR 23. Blue River Lake, OR New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Costl Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost6 8,000 13,000 6,716 7,209 3,000 4,981 5,000 8,807 1,110,000 714,000 436,000 1,392,000 1,190,934 707,807 443,911 1,393,683 760,000 1,303,000 786,000 690,000 745,193 1,242,935 696,184 865,491 1,634,000 1,688,000 2,487,000 2,268,000 1,652,656 1,725,476 2,499,188 2,259,405 548,000 481,000 -278,000 -67,000 545,822 328,104 -118,579 -65,116 613,000 583,000 837,000 769,000 605,587 601,219 835,902 755,008 200,000 240,000 230,000 251,000 201,904 224,466 250,095 246,491 28-27 22,434,827 19 22,434,827 19 6,785,082 20 6,783,658 20 2,839,799 2,839,799 17,718,877 21 17,718,877 21 33,673,093 33,672,689 2,500,677 2,500,677 520,005 22 520,005 22 23,852,818 23 23,836,995 23 234,794 234,794 19,242,046 " 19,242,046 2a 44,171,758 25 44,160,171 25 12,005 12,005 28,800 28,800 1,463,694 51 1,462,781 51 91,642,489 91,642,489 9,524,115 48 9,503,431 48 32,038,225 26 32,038,225 26 4,463,299 53 4,447,705 53 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 28-A (CONTINUED) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 to In Text Sep.30, 1998 24. Cottage Grove Lake, OR 25. Dorena Lake, OR 26. Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR 27. Fall Creek Lake, OR 28. Fern Ridge Lake, OR (Federal Funds)* (Contributed Funds) 30. Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection, OR & WA (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 31. Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, WA (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 32. Scappoose Drainage District, OR 34. Willamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp Cost 718,000 691,000 931,000 696,000 723,951 667,752 954,616 680,606 433,000 425,000 458,000 935,000 432,081 416,996 482,749 893,215 421,000 700,000 473,000 769,155 987,398 1,203,214 74,000 887,209 467,000 507,000 583,000 1,175,000 499,144 496,088 601,053 1,131,573 946,000 1,024,000 1,324,000 1,210,000 937,460 1,012,831 1,343,905 1,165,721 -35,000 50,000 130,000 8,370 32,203 111,318 -50,000 3,820 -310 25,000 10,160 -10,000 28,260 10,200 0 34,000 57,549 343,000 515,000 1,364,000 308,000 355,445 478,952 1,390,176 311,026 12,000 9,041 86,000 80,337 161,000 2,517 30,000 18,600 0 116,030 -10,000 7,227 45,000 257,000 805,000 181,000 45,355 176,742 881,075 198,469 4,013,123 27 4,013,123 27 16,260,288 28 16,229,795 28 14,568,262 29 14,568,262 29 10,806,460 10,747,221 109,097,579 108,773,884 22,118,264 30 22,118,264 30 10,541,671 10,493,045 8,685,635 31 8,685,635 31 22,684,198 32 22,625,680 32 52,666 52,666 21,202,745 21,188,594 10,200 0 111,728,000 111,726,859 3,703,112 3,703,112 3,992,000 3,967,660 4,152,558 4,110,105 24,971,816 33 24,968,535 33 5,343,709 5,343,543 28-28 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-A (CONTINUED) See Section Project In Text COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 35. Willow Creek Lake, OR 36. Bonneville Lock and Dam - Lake Bonneville OR and WA 37. Columbia River Fish Mitigation, OR and WA 38. Columbia River Treaty Fishing Access Sites, OR & WA 39. Cougar Lake, OR 40. Detroit Lake - Big Cliff, OR 41. Green Peter-Foster Lakes, OR 42. Hills Creek Lake, OR New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost7 37,260,114 37,260,114 462,000 563,000 528,000 530,000 490,266 552,081 536,019 512,150 3,459,000 25,000 718,000 70,000 3,487,431 400,129 676,103 96,720 17,480,000 18,889,000 15,894,000 16,114,000 17,469,742 19,131,888 15,966,594 15,637,786 14,487,000 7,299,000 7,140,000 10,960,000 17,369,493 8,125,408 6,944,705 11,092,955 20,003,000 21,536,000 47,391,000 57,719,000 20,986,593 22,663,087 44,279,324 58,545,415 -593,000 2,970,000 2,729,000 7,460,079 686,392 4,664,175 2,538,734 6,520,182 1,255,000 1,142,000 1,443,000 1,272,000 1,267,831 1,134,127 1,456,129 1,217,890 1,873,000 2,293,000 2,107,000 2,537,000 1,900,949 1,989,106 2,410,295 2,406,655 2,414,000 2,398,000 2,828,000 2,683,000 2,595,529 2,405,634 2,823,012 2,643,533 657,000 678,000 668,000 743,000 698,043 676,849 672,351 728,183 6,854,051 6,821,437 789,804,604 3 789,776,894 3 299,351,663 35 298,612,533 35 47,051,000 46,882,783 165,696,000 52 163,005,582 52 15,926,079 14,431,091 58,636,393 36 58,636,393 36 22,407,196 49 22,325,440 49 62,729,698 62,729,698 45,810,607 47 45,644,200 47 363,086 363,086 84,005,788 37 84,005,788 37 46,833,703 38 46,720,251 38 45,700,619 45,700,619 14,846,375 39 14,827,937 39 28-29 FY98 Total Cost to Sep.30, 1998 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 28-A (CONTINUED) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 to In Text Sep.30, 1999 43. John Day Lock and New Work Dam - Lake Umatilla, Approp. 512,400,246 40 OR and WA Cost3 159 512,400,246 40 Maint. Approp. 13,087,000 11,881,000 11,850,000 12,427,000 219,897,727 4' Cost 13,007,116 12,202,888 12,122,437 12,196,731 219,580,069 4' Major Rehab. Approp. 2,840,000 2,534,000 1,591,000 0 44,005,128 54 Cost 3,417,551 2,551,108 720,230 889,761 44,000,665 54 44. Lookout Point - Dexter New Work Lakes, OR Approp. 88,238,395 42 Cost 88,238,395 42 Maint. Approp. 4,062,000 6,274,000 6,109,000 4,663,000 82,909,532 43 Cost 6,457,631 5,881,268 5,593,477 5,257,357 82,498,367 43 45. Lost Creek Lake, New Work Rogue River Approp. 136,408,150 Basin, OR Cost 136,408,150 Maint Approp. 3,730,000 3,876,000 3,831,000 3,988,000 56,315,618 4 Cost 3,831,988 3,865,540 3,864,327 3,820,931 55,855,434 " 46. The Dalles Lock and New Work Dam - Lake Celilo, Approp. 303,260,288 a4 WA and OR Cost 303,260,288 45 Maint. Approp. 11,769,000 12,865,000 11,820,000 11,728,000 201,328,670 46 Cost 11,824,943 12,243,654 12,609,899 11,614,994 201,058,944 4 Major Rehab. Approp. 1,893,000 4,637,000 6,530,000 Cost 1,741,337 4,297,713 6,039,050 1. Excludes $17,742 contributed funds for new work. 2. Includes $1,529,413 for previous project. 3. Includes $150,955 allotted from deferred maintenance funds, Code 700, $62,296 for public works accelerated program repair, and $1,214,865 for previous project.Excludes $24,320 expended from contributed funds prior to 1964. 4. Excludes $31,636 contributed by city of Astoria and Bumble Bee Sea Foods, Astoria, OR (not part of regular project). Includes $223,026 expended from contributed funds prior to 1964 and $428,136 contributed by Port of Portland and $14,792 by Port of Vancouver. 5. Includes $84,930 rehabilitation funds. 6. Includes $1,986,253 for previous project and $608,111 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. Excludes $500,000 contributed funds. 7. Includes $2,186,000 for previous project and $1,188,625 under deferred maintenance, Code 700. 8. Includes funds under Code 721 (small authorized projects) $30,393. Entrance to Oregon slough; $161,897, Camas-Washougal Turning Basinm; $227,908, Hood River Small Boat Basin; $157,470, Bingen, WA, Barge Channel; and $140,619, The Dalles Small Boat Basin. 9. Includes $2,033,408 under code 700 (Deferred Maintenance). 10. Includes $802,096 for previous project, Excludes contributed funds. 11.Includes $178,801 for previous project and $1,444,640 under Code 700, Deferred Maintenance. Excludes $8,387 contributed funds. 12. Includes $340,726 for previous project. Excludes $72,891 contributed funds. includes $36,000 under Code 711. 13. Includes $41,467 for previous project and $78,500 under Code 700, Deferred Maintenance. 14. Excludes $9,900 contributed funds. 15. Excludes $13,779 (other funds) contributed for additional landfill and extension of drainage lines. 16. Includes $21,000, Wedderburn Study Funds. 17. Includes $1,159,357 for previous project. 18. Includes $10,611 for previous project and $188,000 under code 700, Deferred Maintenance. 19. Includes $77,209 for previous project and $57,767 under Code 720 (Small Authorized Projects) Garibaldi Boat Basin. Excludes $592,622 contributed funds and $300,000 channel dredging by local interest. 20. Includes $71,498 for previous project. Excludes $6,450 expended from contributed funds. 21. Includes $39,242 for previous project. Excludes $6,450 expended from contributed funds. 22. Excludes $300,000 contributed funds. 23. Includes $452,110 on operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation and $150,000 under maintenance and operation of dams and other imprcvements of navigable waters. 24. Includes $707,313 for previous project and $170,000 appropriated from public works acceleration program for north jetty rehabilitation. 28-30 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 25. Includes $6,026 for previous project. 26. Includes $96,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. 27. Includes $1,639,828 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 28. Includes $167,878 special recreation use fees. Includes $79,818 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements to navigable waters. 29. Includes $1,038,790 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 30. Includes $1,026,264 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 31. Includes $3,894,673 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project and $136,482 allotted under 721 (small authorized project) reservoir modification. Excludes $2,100 (other funds contributed). 32. Includes $9,750 allotted under Code 700, deferred maintenance. Includes $66,678 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements to navigable waters. 33. Excludes $93,733 contributed funds. 34. Includes $12,200,000 Public Works Administration funds, $20,240,700 National Recover Act Funds, $27,195,400 modification for peaking funds, $136,457 Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project funds and $627,593,352 allotted and $642,322,501 expended second powerhouse funds, $6,000 allotted, $6,000 expended power units funds. 35. Includes $540,000 deferred maintenance funds, Code 700 and $1,692,148 maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes $928,393 allotted and $607,500 expended Bonneville Power Administration funds. 36. Includes $96,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. Includes $1,789,988 allotted and $1,789,954 expended for Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit. 37. Includes $113,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. 38. Includes $983,934 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes $577,410 allotted and $97,151 expended Bonneville Power Administration funds. 39. Includes $82,408 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes $158,205 allotted and $15,007 expended Bonneville Power Administration funds. 40. Includes $25,984 allotted and expended under 710, recreation facilities at completed projects. 41. Includes $1,361,900 for O&M and fish evaluation of Spring Creek Hatchery (funds revoked and paid to USFWS at OCE level, but a cost to project); includes $423,800 special recreation use fees. Includes $933,438 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes $1,203,128 allotted and $653,606 expended Bonneville Power Administration funds. 42. Includes $457,611 allotted and expended under 710, recreation facilities at completed projects. 43. Includes $991,562 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes $759,624 allotted and $110,695 expended Bonneville Power Administration funds. 44. Includes $978,478 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes $12,205 allotted and $2,323 expended Bonneville Power Administration funds. 45. Includes $1,140,747 allotted and expended under 710, recreation facilities at completed projects, and $52,997,220 allotted and expended additional units 15 - 22 funds. 46. Includes $721,490 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes $8,102,546 allotted and $6,588,466 expended Bonneville Power Administration funds. 47. Includes $936,376 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes $549,784 allotted and $156,321 expended Bonneville Power Administration funds. 48. Includes $66,678 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 49. Includes $861,852 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes $157,205 allotted and $16,513 expended Bonneville Power Administration funds. 50. Includes $24,307 under code 422 General Investigation. 51. Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. 52. Excludes $6,000,000 allotted and expended Bonneville Power Administration funds. 53. Includes $5,694 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 54. Excludes $1,163,000 allotted and $157,294 expended Bonneville Power Administration funds. 28-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 28-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents BONNEVILLE NAVIGATION LOCK, BONNEVILLE DAM, OR AND WA Construction of a new navigation lock just south P.L. 99-88 of existing lock. Construction to be funded 50% from fuel taxes paid P.L. 99-662 into Inland Waterways Trust Fund. 2. H. Doc. 817, 77th Cong., 2d Sess S. Doc. 21, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 10, 96th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 102-580, 102nd Cong. Aug 15, 1985 Nov 17, 1986 Mar 02 , 1945 Oct 27, 1965 Dec 04, 1981 Oct 31, 1992 28-32 1. CHETCO RIVER, OR To provide for the stabilization of the channel, by constructing jetties and dredging. Modification of channel entrance and channel improvements. Deepen channel 2 feet to 16 feet, extend the existing jetty system 750 feet for the North, and 1,250 feet for the South jetty. Assume responsibility for O&M of the approximately 200-foot-long access channel to the south commercial boat basin consistent with authorized project depths. COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVERS BELOW VANCOUVER, WA AND PORTLAND, OR 2 pipeline dredges and accessories. Increasing main channel to 30 feet. Consolidating improvement below Portland, OR and between Vancouver, WA and mouth of Willamette. For the Cathlamet channel. Construct an additional dredge (dredge was not built) and accessories for better maintenance, and construct contraction works. Channel from deep water in Willamette Slough to deep water in Columbia River. Depth of 25 feet and width of 300 feet from mouth of Willamette River to Vancouver, WA. Closing east channel at Swan Island in Willamette River on condition that main channel to be opened to project dimensions on west side of island by Port of Portland. For a 35-foot channel 500 feet wide from Portland to the sea. A channel 28 feet deep and 300 feet wide from mouth of Willamette River to Vancouver, with 2 turning basins, each generally 28 feet deep by 800 feet wide by 2,000 feet long. A channel in Columbia River from mouth of Willamette to interstate highway bridge at Vancouver, WA, 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide, with 2 turning basins at Vancouver. Maintenance of not to exceed 35 foot depth at low water in Portland Harbor and Willamette River between its mouth and Broadway Bridge at Portland. Auxiliary channels, 30 feet deep, 300 feet and 500 feet at St. Helens. Extension of lower turning basin at Vancouver, WA, 1,000 feet downstream. An auxiliary channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide along waterfront at Rainier, OR. Improvement of old mouth of Cowlitz River. An auxiliary channel in vicinity of Longview, WA. A small-boat mooring basin at Astoria, OR. A channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide from mouth of Willamette River to interstate highway bridge at Vancouver, WA, with 2turning basins of same depth. A channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Vancouver, WA, to mouth of Columbia River; a turning basin at Vancouver, WA, a turning basin at Longview, WA, and a channel 40 feet deep in Willamette River from mouth to Broadway Bridge which encompasses Portland Harbor area. H. Doc. 1278, 61st Cong., 3d Sess.' H. Doc. 1278, 61st Cong., 3d Sess.' No Prior Report H. Doc. 120, 63d Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 1009, 66th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 156, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc 126, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10 69th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 195, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 71st Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 249, 72d Cong., 2d Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6, 73d Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 235, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 81, 74th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 203, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 341, 77th Cong., 1st. Sess.' H. Doc. 630. 77th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 692, 79th Cong.,2d Sess.' H. Doc. 203, 87th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 452, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' Feb 27, 1911 Jul 25, 1912 Jul 27, 1916 Aug 08, 1917 Sep 22, 1922 Mar 04, 192W2 Mar 03, 1925 Mar 03, 1927 Jul 03, 1930 Sep 06, 19333 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 26, 1937 Aug 26, 1937 Mar 02, 1945 Mar 02, 1945 Jul 24, 1946 Oct 23, 1962 Oct 23, 1962 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA East Channel Main channel West channel 8 feet deep. West channel 10 feet deep and mooring basin with protecting breakwaters. Public Works Administration H. Doc. 44, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 443, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 95, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK, WA AND HEAD OF SAND ISLAND Channel 8 feet deep. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 50,75th Cong., 2d Sess. Channel 10 feet deep and mooring basin. S. Doc. 8, 83d Cong.,lst Sess.1 Dec 11, 1933 Aug 30, 1935 Mar 02, 1945 May 17, 1950 Jun 20, 1938 Sep 03, 1954 Mar 03, 1905 Dec 22, 1944 Sep 03, 1954 Jul 30, 1983 May 24, 1995 Aug 26, 1937 Mar 02, 1945 Jul 24, 1946 Jul 24, 1946 Jul 24, 1946 Jul 24, 1946 Nov 5, 1990 H. Doc. 94, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 as amended H. Doc. 249, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.' P.L. 98-63 Sec. 1135, P.L. 99-662, as amended COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA, AND THE DALLES, OR Construct a channel 27 feet deep by 300 feet from H. Committee Doc. 94, Vancouver, WA, to Bonneville, OR. 74th Cong., 2d Sess.' Construct Camas-Washougal turning basin. H. Doc. 218, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. Construct a channel 27 feet deep by 300 feet wide H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. from Bonneville, OR, to The Dalles, OR. Construct a boat basin at Hood River, OR, 10 feet deep, H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. 500 feet wide, by 1,300 feet long. Construct a barge channel at Bingen, WA, 10 feet deep, H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. 200 feet wide, by 1 mile long, and an access channel 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, by 1,000 feet long to natural mooring basin. Construct The Dalles Harbor 8 feet deep, 400 feet wide S. Doc. 89, 79th Cong., 1st Sess.' by 800 feet long. COLUMBIA RIVER, SEAFARERS MEMORIAL, HAMMOND, OR Engineering, design, acquisition and construction of a P. L. 101-514; H. R. 101-889, 101st support structure to serve as the foundation for the Cong, 2d Sess. Seafarer's Memorial in the Columbia River, in cooperation with the City of Hammond, Oregon. COOS BAY, OR Dredging the Ocean Bar Channel. A channel 22 feet deep to Smith's Mill. Restore North Jetty 9,600 feet long, construct a South Jetty about 3,900 feet long, extend 22-foot bay channel from Smith's Mill to Millington. Extend jetties to such lengths as may be practicable within estimate of total cost of jetties, $3,250,000 given in H. Doc. 150, 67th Cong. A channel 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide, through Pigeon Point Reef, following a location along westerly side of bay. For 24-foot channel from Pigeon Point Reef to Smith's Mill and a turning basin above Marshfield. Increased dimensions of channel across bar and to Isthmus Slough and turning basin opposite Coalbank Slough and at city of North Bend; anchorage basins at mile 3.5 and near mile 7. A mooring basin and connecting channel at Charleston. Increase dimensions to provide for bar channel 45 feet deep, inner channel 35 feet deep to mile 15, and deepening and widening existing turning basins and anchorage area. Deepening the authorized channel by 2 feet and expanding one turningbasin. The entrance would be 47 feet deep to River Mile (RM) 1 and the inner channel 37 feet between RM 1 and 15. H. Doc. 958, 60th Cong.,lst Sess. H. Doc. 325, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 150, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 320, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 110, 70th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d Sess.' S. Doc. 253, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc 646, 80th Cong.,2nd Sess. H. Doc. 151, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 104-46 28-33 TABLE 28-B (CONTINUED) See Section in Text Date Authorizing Act 4. Documents 6. COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR AND WA Extend South Jetty and construct North Jetty and dredging. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Bar channel of 48-foot depth and spur jetty on north shore.9 Deepening the northernmost 2,000 feet of the channel cross section to 55 feet. Lower a 500' section of south jetty at river mile 7. 7. 8. 9. Jun 25, 1910 Mar 02, 1919 Sep 22, 1922 Jan 21, 1927 Jul 03, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Jul 24, 1946 Jun 30, 1948 Dec 31, 1970 Nov 13, 1995 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 10. COOUILLE RIVER, OR 11. 12. 14. 15. 16. 17. Jun 25, 1910 Mar 02, 1919 Jul 03, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Dec 22, 1944 Mar 02, 1945 Aug 26, 1937 Mar 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 Oct 27, 1965 Dec 31, 1970 Oct 31, 1992 Sep 03, 1954 Sep 19, 1890 Jun 25, 1910 Mar 03, 1925 Jul 03, 1958 Oct 22, 1976 Oct 01, 1980 Jul 03, 1930 Aug 26, 1937 Jun 30, 1948 Jul 26, 1912 Mar 04, 1913 Mar 02, 1919 Mar 03, 1925 Mar 02, 1945 Dredging shoals between mouth and Riverton, and removing obstruction between mouth of North Fork and Bandon. For a 13-foot channel from ocean to Bandon. Deepen channel to 16 feet between sea and eastern end of North Jetty. Present project depth between sea and eastern end of North Jetty. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. For 13-foot depth from sea to a point 1 mile above Coquille River Lighthouse and snagging to State Highway Bridge. DEPOE BAY, OR Construction of an inner basin 375 feet long, 125 feet wide and 5 feet deep, with an entrance channel of same depth and 30 feet wide. Construction of an inner basin 750 feet long, 390 feet wide and 8 feet deep, with entrance channel at same depth and 30 feet wide. Construction of entrance channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, concrete breakwater and stone spending beach. PORT ORFORD, OR Extension of existing breakwater by 550 feet. Dredging of turning basin 340 feet long, 100 feet wide, 16 feet deep. Maintain the authorized navigation channel including those portions of the channel within 50 feet of the port facility. ROGUE RIVER HARBOR AT GOLD BEACH, OR Two jetties at entrance and improvement of channel. SIUSLAW RIVER, OR Build two high-tide stone jetties. Extends North Jetty 3,700 feet from old work constructed under previous project and provides for 4,200 foot south jetty. 12-foot deep channel. 18-foot bar channel and 16-foot river channel and a 600-foot extension of north Jetty. (600-foot extension classified deferred.) Phase I advance engineering and design for north and south jetty extensions. Extending north and south jetties about 2,000 and 2,500 feet, respectively. SKIPANON CHANNEL, OR Channel from deep water in Columbia River to railroad bridge, 30 feet deep. Channel extending upstream from railroad bridge a distance of 4,500 feet. Mooring basin 12 feet deep at Warrenton. TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR Construct North Jetty 5,700 feet long and dredging channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, to Bay City. Abandon that portion of project above Bay City. Abandon Bay City Channel and present project dimension of channels and turning basins with regulating works as needed. Repair damage and check erosion on Bayocean Peninsula caused by storm Jan. 1939. H. Doc. 673, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 207, 65th Cong.,lst Sess.' H. Doc. 186, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Committee Print, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Food Control Act of 1944 as amended H. Doc. 672, 76th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 202, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 350, 77th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 107 of R&H Act 1960, approved Feb. 1965. S. Doc. 62, 88th Cong.,2d Sess H. Doc 151, 91st Cong.,2d Sess. P.L. 102-580, 102nd Cong. S. Doc. 83, 83d Cong. 2d Sess. H. Doc. 71, 51st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 648, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. S. Committee Print, Serial, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 204, 85th Cong.,lst Sess.' Final Report of Chief of Engineers P.L. 96-367 H. Doc. 278, 70th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 201, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 93, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. 1 H. Doc. 349, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 760, 65th Cong., 2d Sess H. Doc. 562, 68th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 35, 79th Cong., 1st Sess.4 28-34 TABLE 28-B (CONTINUED) PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (CONTINUED) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jun 30, 1948 Sep 03, 1954 Oct 27, 1965 18. Sep 22, 1922 Jan 21, 1927 Jul 03, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Jun 20, 1938 Mar 02, 1945 Mar 02, 1945 Jun 30, 1948 Sep 03, 1954 Jun 25, 1910 Aug 08, 1917 Jun 26, 19346 Mar 02, 19458 Mar 02, 1919 Aug 26, 1937 Mar 02, 1945 Jul 24, 1946 Jul 03, 1958 Jul 14, 1960 Mar 4, 1913 Oct 23, 1962 Mar 07, 1974 May 17, 1950 Nov 17, 1986 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 28-35 Dredging small-boat basin and approach at Garibaldi, OR, to depth of 12 feet. Closure of breach in Bayocean Peninsula. Construct South Jetty, 8,000 feet long. UMPQUA RIVER, OR North Jetty, 7,500 feet long Present project dimensions of North Jetty and dredging ocean bar. A short south jetty A full length south jetty and maintenance dredging to a 26-foot depth. Channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from mouth to Reedsport. Channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from river channel to Gardiner, and turning basin 22 feet deep, 500 feet wide and 800 feet long. Channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from river channel to dock in Winchester Bay with mooring and turning basin 10 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at inner end. Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from river channel to dock in Winchester Bay with mooring and turning basin 12 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at inner end. Channel 12 feet deep, Scholfield River.s WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR For purchase and rehabilitation of system and construction of concrete division wall. Deepening of locks. Operation and care of canal and locks provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Construction of New Willamette Falls Locks. YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR Restoration and extension of jetties constructed under previous projects, rock removal at entrance, and dredging in bay up to railroad terminus at Yaquina. Extension of north jetty seaward 1,000 feet. 26-foot channel of suitable width across entrance bar, as far as rock bottom will allow, a 20-foot channel 300 feet wide along south side of bay to and including a turning basin 22 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 1,200 feet long. Construct a small-boat mooring basin at Newport, OR. 40-foot bar channel and 30-foot river channel extension of jetties at entrance. A small boat basin, south shore. YAQUINA RIVER, OR Construction of channel 10 feet deep and generally 150 feet wide on Yaquina River and 200 feet wide in Depot Creek. APPLEGATE LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Authorizes a rockfill embankment dam. Authorizes construction of project but no operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR Authorizes gravel-filled embankment dam. Authorizes Construction of hydroelectric power facilities COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR Earthfill dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. S. Doc. 246, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 8, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.' Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Mar. 4, 1977 Doc. 579, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 93-251 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 99-662 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended 19. 20. H. Doc. 650, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 128, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.' S. Doc. 43, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 913, 65th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 320, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 317, 70th Cong., 1st Sess' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9,72d Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 158, 75th Cong.,3d Sess.' S. Doc. 86,76th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 191, 77th Cong., 2d Sess.' S. Doc. 154, 80th Cong., 2d Sess.' S. Doc. 133, 81st Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 202, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. and Annual Report, 1900, P. 4374 H. Doc. 1060, 62d Cong., 3d Sess.' H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong.,3d Sess. H. Doc. 109, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Committee Print, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 119, 77th Cong., 1st Sess.' 21. 22. 23. 24. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized Documents DORENA LAKE, OR Earthfill dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. ELK CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Roller compacted concrete dam. Authorized constructibn but not operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. FALL CREEK LAKE, OR Earth and gravel fill embankment dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR Earthfill embankment dam Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Raise height of dam to obtain additional storage. Construction of waterfowl impoundments. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong.,2d Sess. P.L. 91-439 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong. 3d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended H. Doc 403, 87th Cong. 2d Sess. Sec 1135, P.L.99-662 as amended Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 Oct 23, 1962 Oct 07, 1970 May 17, 1950 Dec 22, 1944 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 Oct 23, 1962 Jun 4, 1993 May 17, 1950 Aug 15, 1985 Jun 22, 1936 May 17, 1950 Jun 22, 1936 Jun 28, 1938 May 17, 1950 Oct 27, 1965 MT. ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA Authorized construction of sediment and retention structures. SCAPPOOSE DRAINAGE DISTRICT, OR Construction of levee system. Raising and strengthening levee. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR Bank protection works, with channel clearing. Provide additional protection against flooding. Addition of 77 locations to scope of projects. WILLOW CREEK LAKE, HEPPNER, OR Storage project for flood control, recreation, and fish and wildlife. P.L. 99-88 F.C. Act 1936 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong.,2d Sess. F.C. Act 1936 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong.,2d Sess. H. Doc. 233, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM -- LAKE BONNEVILLE, OR AND WA Existing project was originally authorized Sep. 30, 1933, by Federal Emergengy Administration of Public Works. Existing project authorized by Congress. S. Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d Sess., (Report of Chief of Engineers dated Aug 21, 1933) Completion, maintenance, and operation of Bonneville project under direction of Secretary of War and supervision of Chief of Engineers, subject to certain provisions herein relating to powers and duties of Bonneville Power Administrator. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, facilities, as amended Authorizes relocation of town of North Bonneville P.L. 93-251 to new town site. Acquisition of Steigerwald Lake wetland area. P.L. 98-396 Authorizes transfer of lands to town of North Bonneville. P.L. 102-396, Sec. 9147 COLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION, OR and WA Design, test, and construct fish bypass facilities. P. L. 100-371 COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY FISHING ACCESS SITES, OR & WA Authorizes project for mitigation of lost treaty fishing Title IV of P.L. 100-581 access resulting from construction of Bonneville Dam. Boundary adjustments. P.L. 104-303, Sec. 512 28-36 TABLE 28-B (CONTINUED) See Section in Text 25. 26. 27. 28. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR AND WA Provides bank protection on Columbia River below H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. river mile 125 and along principal tributaries. 30. 31. 32. 34. 35. 36. Aug 30, 1935 Aug 20, 1937 Dec 22, 1944 Mar 07, 1974 Aug 22, 1984 Oct 1992 Jul 19, 1988 Nov 1, 1988 Oct 12, 1996 37. 38. PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents COUGAR LAKE, OR Rockfill dam. Addition of power Strube Lake reregulating dam. DETROIT LAKE - BIG CLIFF, OR Authorizes concrete gravity structure. Addition of power and regulating Big Cliff Dam with power. GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OR Authorized Green Peter Dam in lieu of originally authorized Sweet Home Lake (1938). Addition of power at Green Peter and White Bridge Reregulating Dam. Changes location of reregulating dam from White Bridge location to Foster. HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR Earth and gravel fill dam. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 83-780. P.L. 87-874 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong.,3d Sess. P.L. 858, 80th Cong.2d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 83-780, F. C. Act 1954 S. Doc. 104, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950 Sep 03, 1954 Oct 23, 1962 June 28, 1938 Jun 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Sep 03, 1954 Jul 14, 1960 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Dec 22, 1944 Mar 24, 1965 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 May 17, 1950 Sep 21, 1962 Oct 15, 1966 May 17, 1950 Dec 22, 1944 Oct 12, 1996 LOOKOUT POINT - DEXTER LAKES, OR Earth-and-gravel filled dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Addition of power and authorization of Dexter Lake as reregulating dam. LOST CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Rock and gravel fill embankment dam, including power. Authorizes construction of project but not operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 89-689, Public Works Approp. Act, 1967 THE DALLES LOCK AND DAM -- LAKE CELILO, WA AND OR Multiple-purpose dam, flood control, navigation and power. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, facilities. as amended WILLAMETE RIVER TEMPERATURE CONTROL, OR Authorized modifications to intake towers to benefit fish habitat. P.L. 104-303 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Public Resolution 105, 67th Cong. 3. Public Works Administration 4. Includes following work, classified inactive. A channel to Hobsonville 200 feet wide and 16 feet deep, with a turning basin 500 feet wide at Hobsonville, and regulating works as needed. 5. Inactive. 6. Permanent appropriations Repeal Act. 7. Flood Control Act 8. Classified Deferred. 9. Spur Jetty "B" classified inactive. 28-37 TABLE 28-B (CONTINUED) 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM -- LAKE UMATILLA, OR AND WA Multiple-purpose dam, flood control, navigation and power. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, facilities, as amended John Day waterfowl management area. S. Doc. 28, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. 44. 45. 46. 51. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 28-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30. 1998 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Alsea River, OR AstoriaTurning Basin, OR' Bandon Small Boat Basin, Coquille, OR' Bridges, Columbia River, Cascade Locks and Hood River, OR (Alteration) Cathlamet, WA' Charleston Channel, Coos Bay, OR' Clatskanie River, OR2 Columbia River, Illwaco, WA' Coos & Millicoma Rivers, OR Cowlitz River, WA Cushman-Mapleton Channels (Siuslaw River), OR' Deep River, WA2 Depoe Bay, OR' Elochoman Slough, WA2 Grays River, WA2 Hammond Small Boat Basin, OR' Interstate Bridge, Columbia River, Portland, OR to Vancouver WA (Alteration) Interstate Highway Bridge(Barge Channel), OR' Kalama Turning Basin, Kalama, WA' Lake River, WA Lewis River, WA Long Tom River, OR Mooring for Battleship Oregon, OR Multnomah Channel, OR2 Nehalem Bay, OR Nestucca River, OR Oregon Slough, (North Portland Harbor), OR2 Salmon River, OR2 Smith River, OR2 Skamokawa Creek, WA South Channel, Government Island, OR' South Slough (Charleston), OR' The Cascades Canal, Columbia River, OR' 2 The Dalles-Celilo Canal, OR and WA' 3 Tongue Point, OR' Umatilla Harbor, OR'4 Westport Slough, OR2 Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, OR Winchester Bay, Umpqua River, OR Yaquina Bay and Harbor Small Boat Basin, OR' Yaquina River, OR' Youngs and Claskanie River, OR Youngs Bay and Youngs River, OR2 7.5 MCY Standby Time 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (sec. 107). 2. Channel adequate for present commerce. 3. Includes $15,537 for previous project 4. Includes $23,489 for previous project. 5. Excludes $42,000 contributed funds. 6. Includes $239,529 for Sec. 107 project. 7. Excludes $75,000 contributed funds. 8. Non-Federal funds, $1,204,100. 9. Includes $419,557 for Sec. 107 project. 10. Excludes $304,826 contributed funds. 11. Excludes $102,000 contributed funds. 12. Project abondoned due to flooding by Bonneville Dam pool. 13. Project abandoned due to flooding by The Dalles Dam pool. 14. Project transferred to Portland District from Walla Walla District FY 1974 and abandoned due to flooding by the John Day Dam pool. 15. Excludes $969,342 contributed funds. 16. Excludes $50,565 contributed funds 17. Excludes $86,586 contributed funds. 18. Excludes $80,000 contributed funds; includes $8,000 for previous project. 19. Excludes $1,776,008 contributed funds. 28-38 Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Abandoned Abandoned Completed Abandoned Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1977 1985 1944 1971 1985 1969 1986 1991 1985 1975 1963 1971 1990 1941 1977 1961 1963 1986 1983 1985 1982 1987 1963 1949 1974 1991 1985 1970 1939 1957 1992 1952 1966 1985 1985 1979 1971 1979 1996 2,000 870,139 1,173,524 1,081,806 171,467 1,197,300 19,240 1,589,231 350,238 18 277,436 6 329,423 15,384 145,588 5 18,641 '7 2,500 519,090 7 1,154,162 8 15,281 302,000 2,700 58,132 437,669 ' 302,006 to 16,881 2,145 143,120 2,400 119,800" 26,821 3,903,780 4,716,205 2,807,876 '19 16,276 862,918 1,616,369 891,695 '5 195,313 16 2,000 9,348 26,237 16,648 194,896 4 2,152,914 1,474,036 32,768 196,864 35,670 58,127 685,677 4,000 25,000 55,195 6,000 90,514 205,130 436,185 559,858 2,833,888 171,909 17,900,293 34,449 4,314,000 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30. 1998 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN Blind Slough Diking District, Clatsop County, OR Consolidated Diking and Improvement District 1, Cowlitz County, WA Deep River Area, Wahkiakum County, WA Deer Island Area, Columbia County, OR Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR Diking District 5, Clatsop County, OR Diking and Improvement District 5, Cowlitz County, WA Diking District 1 and 3 (Puget Island) and Little Island, Wahkiakum County, WA Diking Improvement District 1, Pacific County WA Diking and Improvement District 4, Wahkiakum County, OR Drainage District 1, Clatsop County, OR John Day River Area, Clatsop County, OR Karlson Island, Clatsop County, OR Knappa Area, Clatsop County, OR Lewis and Clark River Area, Clatsop County, OR Lower Cowlitz River Area, Clatsop County, OR Magruder Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Marshland Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Midland Drainage District Columbia County, OR Multnomah Drainage District 1, OR Peninsula Drainage District 1, Multnomah County, OR Port of Kalama, WA' Rainier Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Sauvie Island Areas A and B, Multnomah County, OR Skamokawa Creek Area, Wahkiakum County, WA Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District No. 1, WA Tenasillahe Island, Clatsop County, OR Upper Grays River Area, WA State Hwy 101 & 401, Columbia River, WA' Walluski River, Clatsop County, OR Warrenton Diking District, 1, Clatsop County, OR Warrenton Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR Webb District Improvement Co.,Columbia County, OR Westland District Improvement Co., Columbia County, OR Westport District Columbia and Clatsop Counties, OR Woodson Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Youngs River Dikes, Clatsop County, OR LEWIS RIVER BASIN Diking and Improvement District 11, Cowlitz County, WA COWLITZ RIVER BASIN Cowlitz County Drainage Improvement District 1, WA Diking Improvement District 13, Cowlitz County, WA Huntington Avenue, Castle Rock, WA' Mt. St. Helens and Vicinity, WA LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN Beaver Drainage District, OR Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District No. 2, WA Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 2, WA Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 13, WA Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 15, WA Cowlitz River, Hopkins Creek, WA' Hayden Island, OR Midland Drainage District, OR Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed 28-39 1939 1941 1942 1943 1940 1940 1940 1941 1941 1951 1939 1942 1941 1942 X942 1961 1940 1940 1939 1951 1942 1942 1951 1946 1985 1939 1947 1985 1942 1940 1940 1940 1940 1943 1940 1942 1943 1939 1939 1985 1995 1984 1977 1967 1967 1967 1971 163,397 163,291 69,724 574,123 25,609 25,609 161,381 258,795 26,810 169,542 240,939 33,080 25,773 18,789 158,419 91,652 61,186 39,475 77,774 3 593,034 4 241,148 99,844 47,662 1,623,505 178,885 5,289,833 133,778 61,263 504,642" 66,932 69,503 74,596 84,592 205,531 40,658 22,797 248,802 172,521 42,978 28,592 250,000 42,036,000 3,131,944 1,661,367 363,000 65,345 304,794 236,860 304,511 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 28-E (CONTINUED) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30. 1998 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Multnomah County Drainage District 1, OR Peninsula Drainage District 2, OR Rainier Drainage District, OR Sandy Drainage District, OR Sauvie Island Drainage District, OR Vancouver Lake Area, WA Wahkiakum Co. Diking District 4, WA Washougal Area Levees, Clark County, OR Woodson Drainage District, OR WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN Amazon Creek, OR Mill Creek, Salem, OR Sandy River and Sleepy Hollow, OR' Whelton Ditch, OR ALL OTHER FLOOD CONTROL Arlington, Alkali Canyon, OR7 Bear Creek, Medford, OR' Beaver Creek Near Tillamook, OR2 Castle Rock, Cowlitz River, WA Catching Inlet Drainage District Coos River, OR2 Chewaucan River, Paisley, OR' Clackamas River at Dixon Farm Location, OR Days Creek Lake, OR (Phase I) Depoe Bay, Lincoln County, OR' Deschutes River, Bend, OR2 John Day River (West), OR' Johnson Creek, OR McDonald Dike Road, Nehalem River, OR' McKenzie River Near Walterville, OR2 Miami River, OR' Mill Four Drainage District, Yaquina River, OR Molalla River at Milk Creek Location, OR2 Molalla River at Ressel Location, OR2 Nestucca River, Condor Road, OR' Nestucca River, Vicinity Pacific City, OR' Pendleton Levees, Umatilla River, OR9 (a) Riverside Area Units (b) State Hospital and City Areas (Zone 1) (c) State Hospital and City Areas (Zone 2)2 Pendleton, Umatilla River, OR9 Reedsport Levees, Umpqua River, OR2 Rogue River, OR' Salmon Creek at Oakridge, OR2 Salmon Creek Near Vancouver, WA' Sandy River, City of Troutdale, OR' Siuslaw River, Lane County, OR' Stillwell Drainage District, Tillamook Bay, OR2 Sumner Parker Airport, OR' Trask River, Tillamook County, OR' Tualatin, OR Umatilla River, Stanfield, OR' Umatilla River, Thorn Hollow, OR' Umpqua River and Tributaries, OR Vicinity of Nehalem, Nehalem River, OR West Makinster Rd., Wilson River, OR' Wilson River, Vicinity Highway 101, OR' 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 14). 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205). 3. Includes $26,241, Emergency Relief Act Funds 4. Excludes $25,000 contributed funds 5. Previous completed project, $138,956; $15,056 engineering costs project constructed by local interests. 6. Excludes $154,751 contributed funds. 7. Project transferred from Walla Walla District FY 1974 and abandoned due to flooding by the John Day Dam pool. Includes $3,328 FY 1960 preauthorization costs, Sec. 205, P.L. 80-85. See FY 1960 Annual Report, page 1887 8. Excludes $2,520 contributed funds 9. Reported by Walla Walla District prior to 1974 10. Excludes $230,070 contributed funds for new work and $31,284 Government furnished sheet steel pile. 11. Includes $254,642 contributed funds. 12. Includes $185,000 contributed funds. 13. Excludes $5,822 contributed funds. 14. Excludes $31,031 contributed funds. 15. Excludes $98,313 contributed funds. 28-40 Completed Active Completed Completed Completed Deferred Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Abandoned Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Active Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1964 1961 1967 1954 1966 1981 1971 1973 1964 1960 1993 1967 1950 1967 1957 1959 1952 1982 1988 1986 1981 1985 1966 1948 1955 1952 1960 1959 1960 1939 1971 1960 1985 1994 1961 1984 1985 1985 1952 1952 1986 1,499,186 35,265 593,945 154,012 674,137 889,391 48,619 1,803,488 162,500 1,214,300 6 175,800 '14 276,700 39,624 23,439 23,050 106,198 104,921 182,655 42,761 70,845 8 1,307,216 22,963 106,250 '3 127,800 170,245 29,500 148,358 15,321 118,433 55,007 55,189 11,690 16,000 9,100 267,748 161,540 143,263 968,716 't 86,230 288,447 435,000 12 365,000 ' 5 215,939 176,351 92,500 121,273 1,803,094 33,835 154,600 428,881 45,677 176,000 30,000 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to Sep. 30. 1998 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Restoration of Indian Fishing Grounds Completed 1969 185,000 Bonneville, OR Columbia and Snake Rivers Ports Inactive 1994 5,799,926 Dredging, OR & WA TABLE 28-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended Area East of Albany, OR Bachelor Island, WA Bear Creek, Long Tom River, OR 1 Calapooya River, OR 1 Cascadia Lake, OR Chetco River, OR Clatskanie River Area, Columbia County, OR 1 Clatskanie Drainage Dist. 1, OR 1 Clatsop County Drainage District 1, OR 1 Clatsop County Diking District 3, OR 1 Clatsop County Diking District 4, OR Clatsop County Diking District 6, OR 1 Columbia Drainage District No. 1, OR Columbia Slough, OR 1 Coquille River, OR 1 Cowlitz County Consolidate Diking Improvement District 1, OR Cowlitz River at Randle, WA 1 Coyote and Spencer Creek, Long Tom River, OR 1 Deer Island Drainage District, OR East Muddy and Lake Creek, OR 1 Ferguson Creek Long Tom River, Or Flat Creek, Long Tom River, OR Floodwall and Levees at Portland, OR Gate Creek Lake, OR Holley Lake, OR 1 John Drainage District, OR 1 John Day River, OR 1 Kalama River (South Area) Levee, Cowlitz County, WA 1 Lake River Delta Area, WA Lewis River Area, WA Magruder Drainage District, OR 1 Mud and Basket Slough Rickreall Creek, OR Pendleton Levees, Riverside Area, OR Peninsula Drainage District 1, OR 1 Pilot Rock, Birch Creek, OR 1 Prescott Area, Columbia County, OR 1 Prineville Area, Crooked River and Ochoco Creek, OR 1 Pudding River, OR Shelton Ditch, Marion County, Or 1 Skamokawa (Steamboat Slough), WA 1 Soap Creek, WA Turner Prairie, Mill Creek, OR Umatilla River (Echo), OR 1 Umpqua River-Scholfield River, OR Waldo Lake Tunnel, OR West Muddy Creek and Mary's River, OR 1 Westport Slough, OR (Modification for 32-foot channel) 1 Wiley Creek Lake, OR Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, OR (uncompleted portions) Willamette Falls Fishladder, OR Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR 1. Excludes Pro-rata share of $112,000 for Sweet Home Reservoir. 2. Excludes Pro-rata share of $95,000 for Quartz Creek Reservoir 966 959 960 964 960 938 961 953 948 962 960 959 963 961 974 1969 1940 1942 .963 .941 1962 1950 .967 .939 1960 1962 1966 1948 1977 1977 1971 1965 1987 1997 1965 1978 1974 1961 1978 1978 1987 1978 1953 1977 1977 1970 1987 1970 1978 1977 1977 1987 1987 1979 1974 1978 1977 1978 1974 1977 1987 1977 1968 1978 1977 1979 1987 1979 1977 1978 1964 1987 1958 1970 1977 1960 1987 1961 1987 4,559 11,595 954,114 ' 235,353 268 18,543 4,472 258 8,824 21,352 908 11,095 6,819 6,465 745,001 2 241,992 3 23,754 210,220 55,594 774 9,000 43,292 4,558 125 11,318 5,000 39,624 24,145 4,000 4,056 112,000 142,883 3. Excludes $100,000 preauthorization study costs. 28-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 28-H COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVER BELOW VANCOUVER, WA, AND PORTLAND, OR TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEP. 30, 1998 (SEE SECTION 3 OF TEXT) Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular 28,349,304 388,305,845 416,655,149 Public Works 446,296 14,414 460,710 Emergency Relief Administration 138,449 98,668 237,117 Total U.S. 28,934,049 388,418,927 417,352,976 Contributed Prior to 1964 223,026 24,320 247,346 Contributed (1975) 35 to 40-foot Channel 442,928 442,928 Total Contributed 665,954 24,320 690,274 Total All Funds 29,600,003 388,443,247 418,043,250 TABLE 28-I PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS (SEE SECTION 13 OF TEXT) Project Date Survey Conducted Baker Bay, WA Oct 1998 Clatskanie, OR Nov 1998 Depoe Bay, OR Apr 1998 Depoe Slough, OR Jul 1998 Hammond, OR Sep 1998 Skipanon, OR Nov 1998 Tillamook, OR Aug 1998 Yaquina River, OR Jul 1998 TABLE 28-J WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF EXISTING CANAL AND LOCKS (SEE SECTION 19 OF TEXT) Usable Lock Dimensions Series of 4 locks, each 175 feet by 37 feet' Lift of each lock Lock 1 (Lower), 22,5 feet; Lock 2, 8.7 feet; Lock 3, 10.9 feet and Lock 4 (Upper), 8.1 feet2 Depth of Miter Sills at Lower Water Lower Lock, 8.4 feet; Upper Lock, 6 feet Character of foundation Rock Kind of Dam Fixed 3 Type of Construction Concrete Year of Completion 1873; Purchased by United States Apr. 26, 1915 Cost Unknown; purchase price $375,000 1. A guard lock 210 by 40 feet, which is used only at higher states of water, is at upper end of canal basin. 2. A concrete division wall, 1,227 feet long, extending from Lock 4 to Guard Lock, separates upper basin of canal from head race, which formerly led directly from basin and supplied water for powerplants operated by Crown Zellerbach Corp., and Portland Ry., Light & Power Co., which is now being operated by Portland General Electric Co. 3. The dam is owned by private parties. 28-42 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-K FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS See Section Date of Peak Inflow Storage Used in Text Project Peak Inflow Cu. FtJSec. Acre/feet 22. Applegate Lake, OR January 16, 1998 8,487 3,467 23. Blue River Lake, OR January 11, 1998 6,326 15,410 24. Cottage Grove Lake, OR January 13, 1998 1,301 2,090 39. Cougar Lake, OR January 17, 1998 5,977 32,550 40. Detroit Lake, OR January 15, 1998 13,608 66,730 25. Dorena Lake, OR January 17, 1998 5,773 8,770 27. Fall Creek Lake, OR January 11, 1998 5,801 12,310 28. Fern Ridge Lake, OR January 13, 1998 4,229 6,740 41. Foster Lake, OR January 19, 1998 11,975 6,080 41. Green Peter Lake, OR January 14, 1998 18,573 69,490 42. Hills Creek Lake, OR January 17, 1998 10,061 46,160 44. Lookout Point Lake, OR January 17, 1998 13,461 85,930 45. Lost Creek Lake, OR January 17, 1998 12,250 27,820 28-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 28-L WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITIES PROJECTS NOT SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED (SEE SECTION 47 OF TEXT) Fiscal Year Costs Project Status' Federal Non-Federal Total Beach Erosion Control Projects Pursuant to Section 103 of the 1962 Rivers and Harbors Act, Public Law 874, 87th Congress, As Amended US 101, Beverly Beach, OR F 11,272 11,272 Total Section 103 11,272 - 11,272 Mitigation of Shore Damages Attributable to Navigation Projects Pursuant to Section 111 of the 1968 Rivers and Harbors Act, Public Law 483, 90th Congress, As Amended Siuslaw River, Florence, OR F 13,885 - 13,885 Total Section 111 13,885 - 13,885 Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107 of the 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act, Public Law 645, 86th Congress, as Amended Newport, OR P/C 777,667 - 777,667 Port of Brookings (Chetco), OR F 10,709 - 10,709 Port of Morrow, OR F 36,261 - 36,261 Coordination 5,018 - 5,018 Total Section 107 829,655 829,655 Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as Amended Keizer, OR F 117,710 19,546 137,256 Lewis River, Woodland, WA F 27,930 -- Mill Creek, The Dalles, OR F 35,258 - - Peninsula Drainage Dist #1, OR P/C 913,608 262,328 1,175,936 Salem, OR F 65,440 - 65,440 Coordination 12,327 - 12,327 Total Section 205 1,172,273 281,874 1,454,147 Emergency Streambank Protection Activities Pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as Amended Albany, OR -271 271 - Wilson River, McKinster Rd, Tillamook, OR 68 - 68 Coordination 14,987 - 14,987 Total Section 14 14,784 271 15,055 Project Modifications for Improvement of the Environment Pursuant to Section 1135 of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act, Public Law 662, 99th Congress, as Amended Amazon Creek Wetlands, OR F 113,205 - 113,205 Coos Bay Western Snowy Plover, OR C 12,616 17,014 29,630 Dairy Creek, Sturgeon Lake, OR P 4,991 4,991 Fox Creek, OR D 10,928 - 10,928 Larson Slough D 5,800 - 5,800 Lower Columbia Slough, OR F 219,347 219,347 Port of Brookings, OR D 8,181 - 8,181 Richardson Park, OR D 9.981 - 9,981 Trestle Bay, OR C 16,300 5,500 21,800 Initial Appraisals 21,374 - 21,374 Coordination 8,158 8,158 Total Section 1135 430,881 22,514 453,395 1/ Status: C = Construction; D = Planning and Design Analysis; F = Feasibility; P = Plans and Specifications 28-44 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-M FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITIES EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACTIVITIES (SEE SECTION 48 OF TEXT) Appropriation Contributed 96X3125 Funds Disaster Preparedness Program (Category 100) Corps Statutory Activities 153,354 Activities in Support of Others 30,277 Facilities 27,521 - Inspections 27,415 Total Disaster Preparedness Program 238,567 Emergency Operations (Category 200) Flood Fight and Rescue Operations -- After Action Reports -- Field Investigations - - Post Flood Response -- Total Emergency Operations Rehabilitation (Category 300) Federal Flood Control Works 821,064 178,754 Non-Federal Flood Control Works 137,893 11,458 Field Investigations 21,444 Inspections 7,531 - Total Rehabilitation 987,932 196,233 Advance Measures Cowlitz/Toutle Operations Total Advance Measures Reimbursement Activity Other Agencies 18,488 Other Corps Offices 79,722 Total Reimbursement Activity 98,209 28-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 28-N PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, AND POWERPLANT Project Bonneville Lock and Dam OR and WA -- Lake Bonneville (See Section 36 of Text) John Day Lock and Dam, OR and WA -- Lake Umatilla (See Section 43 of Text) NAVIGATION LOCK (NEW) Dimensions: Clear Width of Chamber Greatest Length Available for Full Width Lift (Vertical): At Extreme Low Water and Normal Pool Level At Normal River Stage At Extreme High Water Depth Over Miter Sills at Adopted Low Water Character of Foundation Open to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Capacity Elevation of Gate Sills on Crest of Spillway Height above Lowest Foundation Length of Dam Proper Length of Dam Overall Width at Base Gate Openings Crest Overflow (Above Mean Sea Level) Elevation(Normal)(Above Mean Sea Level) POWERPLANT Length (First Powerhouse) Length (Second Powerhouse) Width (First Powerhouse) Width (Second Powerhouse) Height (Roof to Bedrock) (First Powerhouse) Height (Roof to Bedrock)(Second Powerhouse) Generator (Station Unit) Generators (First Powerhouse) Generators (Second Powerhouse) Fishwater Supply Units (Second Powerhouse) Total Rated Capacity Speed NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Space for Additional Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity Total Potential Capacity 86 Feet 675 Feet 66 Feet 59 Feet About 30 Feet 19 Feet Andesite March 1993 Concrete Gravity 1938 1,600,000 CFS 23.3 Feet About 170 Feet 1,090 Feet 1,230 Feet 200 Feet 18 24 Feet Pool 72 Feet 1,027 Feet 953 Feet 190 Feet 235 Feet 190 Feet 200 Feet 1 @ 5,000 kw 1 @ 48,000 kw 1 @ 59,500 kw 8 @ 60,00 kw each 8 @ 66,500 kw each 2 @ 13,100 kw each 1,145,700 kw 75 Revolutions per Minute 86 Feet 669 feet 97 Feet 105 Feet 113 Feet 15 Feet April 1968 Concrete Gravity March 1968 2,250,000 cfs 210 Feet Tainter 50 ft. by 58.5 Ft. 20 1,975 Feet 243 Feet 16 4 135,000 kw 2,160,000 kw 2,700,000 kw 28-46 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-N (Continued) PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, AND POWERPLANT Project Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line The Dalles Lock and Dam, OR and WA -- Lake Celilo (See Section 46 of Text) IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Flood Control Storage Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area At Elevation 268 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Type Lift Normal Net Clear Length Net clear Width Normal Depth Over Upper Sill Minimum Depth Over Lower Sill Opened To Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type Elevation of Crest Top of Crest Gates Number of Gates Size of Gates Height (Foundation to Crest) Design Flood POWERPLANT Powerhouse Dimensions Generators Main Units 268-257 Feet 276 Feet 500,000 Ac.-ft. 76.4 Miles 55,000 Acres 15 Ft. by 250 Ft. 200 miles Single Lift 87.5 Feet 675 Feet 86 Feet 20 Feet 15 Feet March 17, 1957 Controlled 121 Ft. msl 162 Ft. msl 23 50 by 43 Feet 120 Feet 2,290,000 cfs 240 by 2,150 feet 14 @ 78,000 kw each 8 @ 86,000 kw each 2 @ 13,500 kw each 1,807,000 kw 2 @ 3,000 kw each Fishwater Supply Units Total Rated Capacity Station Service Units 28-47 235 Feet July 1968 SEATTLE, WA, DISTRICT * This District comprises Washington State except south- Pacific Ocean south of international boundary to Cape ern and southeastern portions, northern Idaho, and north- Disappointment, and to the Columbia River above Yakima western Montana, embraced in drainage basins tributary to River, inclusively. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Miscellaneous 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. Anacortes Harbor, WA ............................................ 29-2 Ediz Hook, WA ........................................ 29-2 Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA............. 29-2 Friday Harbor, WA............................................... 29-3 Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA ................... 29-3 Grays Harbor, Point Chehalis, WA................... 29-4 Kenmore Navigation Channel, WA ......................... 29-4 Lake Crockett, WA ..................................... 29-4 Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA .......................... 29-5 Neah Bay, WA................................... 29-5 Olympia Harbor, WA .............................................. 29-6 Project Condition Surveys ................................... 29-6 Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, WA............. 29-6 Quillayute River, WA .............................................. 29-6 Seattle Harbor, WA ............................................... 29-7 Swinomish Channel, WA...................................... 29-7 Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, WA .................................. 29-8 Beach Erosion Control 18. Lummi Shore Road, WA ......................................... 29-8 Flood Control 19. Cedar River, Renton, WA ........................................ 29-9 20. Chehalis River at South Aberdeen and Cosmopolis, WA.................................. 29-9 21. Flathead River, MT............................ .......... 29-9 22. Howard A. Hanson Dam, WA................................. 29-9 23. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects.................................................................... 29-10 24. Mud Mountain Dam, WA........................................ 29-10 25. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations.......... ................. 29-10 26. Stillaguamish, River, WA...................................... 29-11 27. Tacoma, Puyallup River, WA.................................. 29-11 Multiple Purpose Power 28. Albeni Falls Dam, ID............................................... 29-11 29. Chief Joseph Dam - Rufus Woods Lake, WA ......... 29-12 30. Libby Dam - Lake Koocanusa, MT ...................... 29-12 31. Miscellaneous Work under Special Authorization...29-13 32. Sammamish River Weir Restoration, WA................29-13 33. Thornton Creek, WA.................................... 29-13 34. National Emergency Preparedness Program (NEPP)................. ................... 29-14 35. General Regulatory Functions Program....................29-14 General Investigations 36. 37. 38. Surveys.............................................. ...... 29-14 Collection and Study of Basic Data..........................29-14 Preconstruction Engineering and Design..................29-14 Tables Table 29-A Cost & Financial Statement.......................29-16 Table 29-B Authorizing Legislation....................... 29-22 Table 29-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .... ......................... 29-27 Table 29-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects..................................................... 29-28 Table 29-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects.......................................................29-28 Table 29-F Other Authorized Multiple Purpose Power Projects ........................................ 29-31 Table 29-G Other Authorized Miscellaneous Activities .................................... 29-31 Table 29-H Other Preconstruction Engineering and Design Projects ..................................... 29-32 Table 29-I Deauthorized Projects ................................ 29-32 Table 29-J Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA, Principal Features of Double Lock and Dam.............29-33 Table 29-K Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858 ........... 29-33 Table 29-L Miscellaneous Activities Pursuant to Section 1135, Public Law 99-662 .............. 29-33 -29-1- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1998 Navigation 1. ANACORTES HARBOR, WA Location. On northern point of Fidalgo Island in Puget Sound, 17 miles south of Bellingham, WA, and 64 miles north of Seattle. The main harbor is on Guemes Channel. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18427.) Existing project. Channel in Capsante Waterway, 12 feet deep and 150 to 250 feet wide, between east side of Q Avenue and deep water in Fidalgo Bay, a distance of 2,850 feet; a mooring basin 12 feet deep, 570 feet wide, and 960 feet long adjacent to north side of Capsante Waterway, protected by two pile breakwaters, each 470 feet long, east and southeast of basin; and a navigation channel 18 feet deep, 150 feet wide, extending 5,180 feet from deep water in Guemes Channel to the west shore of Fidalgo Bay (construction under authority of Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Construction cost for this feature is recorded in Table 29-C). Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.2 feet. Extreme range is about 15.5 feet. Project was completed in January 1977. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1977). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 24 piers and wharves in the Port of Anacortes, 15 on Guemes Channel, 3 on Capsante Waterway, and 7 on Fidalgo Bay. Three wharves on Guemes Channel are open for public use; of these, one is publicly owned and operated and used for handling general cargo in foreign and domestic trade. In addition, two wharves are used for ferries plying to the San Juan Islands and to Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Both are publicly owned and operated. Two of the wharves on Capsante Waterway and basin are publicly owned and operated and used for receiving petroleum products, and as a moorage for fishing and pleasure craft. All other wharves are used for general industrial purposes. In addition, there are two oil-refinery wharves located to the south of Capsante Waterway which are privately owned and operated and used for handling petroleum products in foreign and domestic trade. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Post Series No. 37 - Ports of Port Angeles, Port Townsend, Everett, Anacortes, and Bellingham, WA, revised 1987.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor. Routine coordination with Port of Anacortes, city of Anacortes, and navigation users. 2. EDIZ HOOK, WA Location. Ediz Hook and city of Port Angeles are on the Strait of Juan de Fuca in Clallam County, WA, about 100 miles northwest of Seattle. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18468.) Existing project. Provides for about 16,400 linear feet of rock revetment, together with initial beach replenishment and periodic nourishment. Project was completed in October 1978. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1979.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Of the 27 waterfront facilities at Port Angeles Harbor, 3 are located along the inner side of Ediz Hook. Functional uses of the piers include placing logs into the water from trucks for shipment by rafting; mooring harbor pilot boats, U.S. Coast Guard vessels, Naval Reserve vessels, and occasionally, oceanographic research vessels; and fueling government vessels. (See Port Series No. 37 - Ports of Port Angeles, Port Townsend, Everett, Anacortes, and Bellingham, WA, revised 1987.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Inspection and coordination with local sponsor. Maintenance, contract: None. 3. EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA Location. On Port Gardner Bay, at northern end of Possession Sound, an arm of Puget Sound at Everett, in northwestern Washington; and Snohomish River for 6.3 miles above mouth. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18444.) Existing project. Training dike extending from a point opposite 23rd Street northward 12,550 feet to outlet of Snohomish River, with spur dike extending 400 feet to pierhead line from north end of main dike; spur dike extending 1,410 feet westward from Preston Point; removal of a section of training dike north of Snohomish River outlet; channel 150 to 425 feet wide and 15 feet deep from deep water in Port Gardner Bay to 14th Street dock; thence a settling basin 700 feet wide, 1,200 feet long, and 20 feet deep, thence a channel 150 feet wide and 8 feet deep upriver to head of Steamboat Slough, a total distance of about 6.3 miles; settling basin within upper channel reach about 1 mile long with a capacity of 1 million cubic yards and maintaining East Waterway to 30 feet deep. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.1 feet. Extreme tidal range is about 19 feet. Project was completed in April 1963. (For further details, see page 1683 of Annual Report for 1963. For details relating to previous projects, see page 704 of Annual Report for 1905, page 2005 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1883 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. There are 42 piers and wharves in the Port of Everett, 17 in Port Gardner and 25 on the Snohomish River. These include: 19 publicly owned terminals with 4 -29-2- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT berths handling ocean-going vessels and 1 publicly owned terminal and small-boat basin handling fishing and pleasure craft. A portion of the East Waterway has been deepened and modified by the U.S. Navy for a Homeport. (See Port Series No. 37 - Ports of Port Angeles, Port Townsend, Everett, Anacortes, and Bellingham, WA, revised 1987.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted throughout the year. Aerial survey of the Jetty Island habitat development site was performed. Prepared plans and specifications for maintenance dredging and awarded contract. Monitored maintenance dredging contract. Maintenance, contract: A continuing contract fot pipeline maintenance dredging, awarded in FY 1997, was completed in March. Dredging of the upstream and downstream settling basins resulted in 439,235 cy of shoal material being removed at a cost of $1,378,445. Dredged material was beneficially used to nourish an eroding berm on Jetty Island which protects an intertidal habitat for juvenile salmon. 200,184 cy of material were rehandled from the city disposal site to the EPA Superfund cleanup site located on the Tulalip Indian Reservation. A continuing contract for pipeline maintenance dredging was awarded in September. 4. FRIDAY HARBOR, WA Location. Friday Harbor is located on the eastern shore of San Juan Island on the inland waters of northwestern Washington, about 28 nautical miles east of Victoria, British Columbia, and 60 nautical miles north of Seattle, WA. San Juan Island is one of over 170 islands in the San Juan Archipelago. Friday Harbor is the San Juan Island county seat and a United States Customs Port of Entry. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18425.) Existing project. Concrete floating breakwater (1,600 feet) to protect the existing port facilities and to allow the Port of Friday Harbor to provide 294 additional permanent moorage spaces and 44 additional transient spaces. Construction was completed in March 1984. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-4 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Routine coordination with the Port of Friday Harbor, U.S. Coast Guard, and navigation users. Further coordinated with the Port relative to the scheduled breakwater maintenance in FY 2000. 5. GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA Location. Harbor lies at mouth of Chehalis River, in southwestern part of Washington, 45 miles north of entrance to Columbia River. Chehalis River rises in southwestern part of Washington about 40 miles east of Pacific Ocean, flows generally northwesterly and empties into eastern part of Grays Harbor. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18502.) Existing project (including navigation improvements to date). Provides for an entrance channel across the bar and through entrance 600 to 1000 feet wide and 38 to 46 feet deep, to be secured by a south jetty 13,734 feet long and a north jetty 17,200 feet long, and by dredging; maintenance of channel 36 feet deep and 350 feet wide from deep water in Grays Harbor 14 miles to Cow Point; thence 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide, suitably widened at bends, to a point 13,700 feet upstream from Union Pacific Railroad bridge at Aberdeen, a distance of 4.125 miles; a turning basin 30 feet deep, 550 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long at upstream end of 30-foot channel near Cosmopolis; three breakwaters at, and maintenance of entrance channel to Westhaven Cove; protection of Point Chehalis for an exposed length of about 7,500 feet; and removal of 350- foot southwestern extension of the breakwater, replacing it with an 865-foot northeastern extension, and adding a 200-foot spur breakwater along the southerly entrance, constructed under authority of Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Construction cost for this feature is recorded in Table 29-C. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.9 feet at Point Chehalis, 10.1 feet at Aberdeen, and 8.1 feet at Montesano. Extreme range is 17.5 feet at Point Chehalis, 17.8 feet at Aberdeen, and 23.8 feet at Montesano (river flood of 1935). ( For details relating to previous projects, see pages 2002-03 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1863 of Annual Report for 1938.) Improved project. Authorized by Section 202 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Project construction was started in April 1990. Completed project features are: deepen and widen 20 miles of existing 30-foot channel across ocean bar (46 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide), through the harbor entrance (46-38 feet deep and 1,000-600 feet wide), through South to Cow Point Reaches (36 feet deep and 350 feet wide); expand and deepen Cow Point turning basin; deepen two downstream local berths; and construct fish and initial crab mitigation. Modification of Union Pacific Railroad bridge was deleted from project scope in 1995. Remaining project features are: deepen remaining upstream channel and construct final crab mitigation to be completed in FY 1999 and FY 2000, respectively. Completion of project is currently scheduled for early 2001. Estimated project cost is $28,500,000 ($18,507,000 Federal; $9,993,000 non-Federal). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local Cooperation Agreement with Port of Grays Harbor, local sponsor for improvement project, was executed on February 16, 1990. The Port is contributing 35 per cent of improved project cost. In complying with terms of local cooperation, the Port is required to furnish lands and diked disposal areas and assure relocation of utility lines. Terminal facilities. There are 20 waterfront facilities (piers, wharves, and docks), exclusive of those available to -29-3- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1998 recreational craft, at Grays Harbor, of which 5 are publicly owned. In foreign and domestic trade, they serve various purposes which include the receipt and/or shipment of: logs and lumber, woodchips, conventional and containerized general cargo, seafood and fishing supplies, sand and gravel, and construction materials. Other uses include: mooring and icing fishing boats, mooring small vessels for outfitting and repair, and mooring company owned tugs. Those piers operated by the U.S. Coast Guard moor government owned vessels. (See Port Series No. 35 - Ports of Tacoma, Olympia, and Grays Harbor, WA, revised 1993.) Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Coordinated with Port of Grays Harbor (local sponsor), resource agencies, and Grays Harbor pilots. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted throughout the year. The Corps hopper dredge Yaquina dredged in the Entrance Channel and in Cow Point in May, with 265,363 cy dredged at a cost of $900,000. Sandy material from the Entrance Channel was deposited at Half Moon Bay as offshore nourishment to reduce erosion adjacent to the South Jetty and at Westport. The Corps hopper dredge Essayons dredged 103,249 cy in the Bar Channel at a cost of $432,000. Sand from Bar Channel (63,337 cy) was placed offshore of South Beach to reduce erosion adjacent to the South Jetty. A study, directed by the ASA for Civil Works, for long-term erosion control at the South Jetty was continued under O&M with designs prepared to extend the Westport revetment approximately 1,900 feet. Maintenance, contracte Maintenance dredging of the inner harbor by clamshell dredge was completed at a cost of $2,994,572 with 1,490,027 cy of material being removed, and included removal of 40,464 cy of material from the Westport marina. Maintenance dredging of the outer harbor by hopper dredge was completed at a cost of $817,400 with 472,223 cy of material being removed, of which 156,105 cy was deposited in Half Moon Bay to combat erosion. Crab mitigation for the incremental increase in crab entrainment due to the higher post-improvement channel maintenance dredging volume was completed in April. This was accomplished by spreading 500 cy of oyster shell over 1.25 acres to create enhanced crab habitat at a cost of $16,250. 6. GRAYS HARBOR, POINT CHEHALIS, WA Location. Point Chehalis is located on the south side of the mouth of Grays Harbor, adjacent to the federally authorized navigation project. Point Chehalis is about 30 miles from the city of Aberdeen, in the community of Westport, WA. Existing project. Shoreline erosion had been occurring along the Point Chehalis shoreline for a number of years. The Point Chehalis erosion protection project was authorized in 1948 and constructed in 1954. Current erosion had threatened Westport's sewage treatment plant and outfall line. Plan of improvement consisted of beach nourishment with periodic renourishment over a 10-year period. Approximately 300,000 cy of maintenance dredging have been placed on the beach to control erosion. Initial project was completed in December 1995. Mitigation contract was completed in FY 1998, with final fiscal requirements remaining. Local cooperation. The local sponsor (city of Westport) is responsible for operation and maintenance of the project after the 10th year. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on September 1, 1995. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Supervised mitigation contract. New work, contract: Completed mitigation contract. 7. KENMORE NAVIGATION CHANNEL, WA Location. The Kenmore Navigation Channel lies at the northern end of Lake Washington adjacent to the Sammamish River. Kenmore, an unincorporated industrial and business center in King County just north of Seattle, WA, encompasses the lands to the north of the channel. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18447.) Existing project. The construction of a navigation channel to serve the Kenmore industrial area involved a 15-foot-deep channel which consists of a 100-foot-wide inner channel 900 feet long, an 800-foot-long transition channel with a 24 degree 30-foot bend and a maximum width of 190 feet, and a 120- foot-wide outer channel, 1,200 feet long. The project also consists of the installation of a goose nesting area on property adjacent to the new channel as mitigation for the removal of goose nests during construction. Project was completed in March 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Monitored dredging contract. Conducted channel condition surveys in January. Maintenance, contract: Maintenance dredging of 49,126 cy with open water disposal at the Elliot Bay PSDDA site was completed in January at a total cost of $302,824. The channel maintenance has reduced light loading, resulting in a significant commercial tonnage increase. 8. LAKE CROCKETT, WA Location. The harbor is on the west side of Whidbey Island, about 35 nautical miles north of Seattle, WA. The lake lies parallel to Admiralty Bay and is separated from it by a narrow strip of gravel beach. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18441.) Existing project. Provides for a basin in Lake Crockett with an area of about 6 acres and 25 feet deep at mean lower low -29-4- EATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT water, connected with Admiralty Bay by a channel of the same depth and 200 feet wide, protected by a breakwater; and navigation improvement by dredging, constructed under authority of Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Construction cost for this feature is recorded in Table 29-C (Keystone Harbor, Admiralty Inlet). The diurnal tidal range in Admiralty Bay is 8.4 feet and the extreme range is about 16.5 feet. Project was completed in March 1993. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1993.) Recreational facilities at project under costsharing agreement with Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission include the following construction and improvements: construct a 35-unit camping loop and restroom, new boat ramp handling facility, breakwater, a restroom in the day-use area and porto-potti dumps for boats; and expand dayuse facility and add riprap at the construction site. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. One publicly owned passenger and automobile ferry landing within the dredged basin is open for public use, and is adequate for existing commercial traffic. The basin contains two publicly owned boat ramps open for public use. The ramps are adequate for recreational craft. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted during the year. Plans and specifications for maintenance dredging were prepared and advertised for bids. Maintenance, contract: None. 9. LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA Location. Entirely within city of Seattle and extends from Puget Sound through Shilshole Bay, Salmon Bay, Lake Union, Portage Bay, and Union Bay to deep water in Lake Washington. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18447.) Existing project. Provides for a double lock and fixed dam from gated spillway and necessary accessory works, including fishladder, at the Narrows at entrance to Salmon Bay, about 1.25 miles from deep water in Puget Sound; for a channel 34 feet deep and 300 feet wide from Puget Sound to Burlington Northern Railway bridge, about 5,500 feet, with a passing basin 34 feet deep and log basin 8 feet deep at turn below railway bridge; then 34 feet deep and 150 feet to 200 feet wide to locks, about 900 feet; and a guide pier 600 feet long; for revetment of canal banks between locks and Lake Union and between Lakes Union and Washington; and for a channel 30 feet deep with a width of 100 feet from locks to Lake Union, 200 feet thence to Portage Cut, 100 feet through Portage Cut, and thence 200 feet wide through Union Bay to Lake Washington. Section included in project is about 10 miles long. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Extreme tidal range is 19.3 feet. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.3 feet, and between mean lower low water and extreme low water is 4.6 feet. Ordinary fluctuation in upper pool is 24 inches; extreme fluctuation has been 3.6 feet. Principal features of double lock and dam are set forth in Table 29-J. Project was completed in 1934. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1935. For details relating to previous projects, see page 2003 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1880 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The 18 waterfront facilities at Lake Washington Ship Canal are used for fuel oil, seafood, marine repair, drydocking, outfitting, mooring fishing vessels and repairs to the locks' equipment. Project is a part of Seattle Harbor's inner harbor. (See Port Series No. 36, revised 1993.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Locks were operated and maintained all year, conducting 17,346 lockings, passing 10,172 commercial vessels, 52,276 pleasure vessels, and 1,932,206 tons of commerce. The fishladder passed more than 160,000 fish and there were 1,393,337 project visitors. Maintenance, contract: Contract for exterior concrete repair was completed. Contract for large lock machinery upgrade continued. Contract for pier rehabilitation was awarded. 10. NEAH BAY, WA Location. On south side of the Strait of Juan de Fuca, about 6 miles east of Cape Flattery, at the entrance to the Strait from the Pacific Ocean, and about 60 miles west of Port Angeles, WA. (See NOAA Survey Charts 18480, 18484 and 18485.) Existing project. Provides for a rubblestone breakwater about 8,000 feet long between Waada Island and the westerly shore of the bay, reinforcement of existing rock revetment extending approximately 2,200 feet west from Baada Point, and about an 800-foot extension of the revetment westward. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.2 feet. Project was completed in July 1956. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1957.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are six wharves at Neah Bay, including two owned by the United States which are used by the Coast Guard, and four privately owned wharves, three of which are open to general public use to accommodate small commercial fishing vessels. In addition to the wharves, there is a facility for dumping and rafting logs. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Inspection of ocean breakwater for needed repair. Monitored equipment rental contract work. Maintenance, contract: Repaired low areas on the rubble mound breakwater by equipment rental. Approximately 4,000 tons of armor rock was placed. -29-5- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1998 11. OLYMPIA HARBOR, WA Location. Near southern end of Puget Sound at head of Budd Inlet, about 45 miles southwest of Tacoma. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18456.) Existing project. Provides for a channel between deep water in Budd Inlet and port terminal, 30 feet deep at mean lower low water and 500 feet wide, with suitable additional width at bend; a turning basin adjacent to port terminal 30 feet deep, 3,350 feet long, and 500 to 960 feet wide; and construction of a 656-foot concrete floating breakwater and dredging of the entrance and access channels and turning basin, constructed under authority of Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Construction cost for this feature is recorded in Table 29-C (East Bay Small Boat Basin). Extreme tidal range is 22.5 feet. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 14.4 feet. Existing project was completed in 1985. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1369 of Annual Report for 1934 and page 1873 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Five port facilities are located in Olympia at Budd Inlet, exclusive of the numerous waterfront facilities in the ports used by recreational craft. The industrial docks are used for conventional general cargo, logs, timber products and miscellaneous mooring. (See Port Series No. 35 - Ports of Tacoma, Olympia, and Grays Harbor, WA, revised 1993.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Maintained project coordination. Conducted channel condition surveys in December 1997 and May 1998. Performed water quality monitoring at East Bay Marina during the seasonal periods of poor water quality. A surface inspection of the floating concrete breakwater was performed and confirmed the breakwater and anchor pile system to be in good condition. Further coordinated with the Port of Olympia on proposed channel maintenance and minor widening requested by users. 12. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Hydrographic surveys and inspections to determine navigation conditions at boat basins, small navigation projects, and channels not funded on a project basis for the current fiscal year. Soundings and visual inspections in subject areas are conducted in order to evaluate shoaling conditions. Hydrographic charts are prepared and distributed. Fiscal year costs were $229,860. Total costs to date are $3,923,706. SURVEYS CONDUCTED Tacoma Harbor, WA Waterway Connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay, WA February, March 1998 May 1998 13. PUGET SOUND AND ITS TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA Location. Puget Sound is in the western part of Washington. Cities of Seattle, Tacoma, Olympia, Everett, Bellingham, and many small towns are on its bays and inlets. (See NOAA Survey Charts 18440, 18441, and 18448.) Existing project. Maintenance of Puget Sound and its tributary waters by snagging and dredging; and removal, in cooperation with the U.S. Coast Guard and city of Seattle, of floating debris from the Seattle Harbor area. Work consists of collecting large pieces of drift, waterlogged pilings, logs and other debris considered hazardous to navigation from Puget Sound and federally authorized channels. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 2003 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1869 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. None required. Cities of Seattle, Tacoma, Olympia, Everett and Bellingham and the State of Washington are cooperating in a program for control of floating debris in their harbors and setting up collection sites for our debris vessel. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities at numerous localities on Puget Sound and its tributary waters are, in general, considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: The debris vessel Puget operated continuously throughout Puget Sound and its tributary waters and removed approximately 3,500 tons of floating debris and hazards to navigation. Debris was disposed of locally or loaded aboard barges and disposed of by contract. Snagging operations were accomplished at Blaine Harbor, Bellingham Harbor, Swinomish Channel, Skagit River, Everett Harbor, Snohomish River (upstream to town of Snohomish), Lake Washington Ship Canal, Lake Washington, Tacoma Harbor, Olympia Harbor, Duwamish River, and Elliott Bay. Maintenance, contract: One thousand tons of harbor debris were disposed of at a cost of $92,000. Contractor continues to recycle much of the debris, reducing the cost of disposal by contract. Remainder of debris is placed in a demolition landfill or recycled through other government agencies. 14. QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA Location. River is formed by junction of Soleduck and Bogachiel Rivers, in northwestern Washington, and flows westerly 5 miles to Pacific Ocean at La Push, about 30 miles south of Cape Flattery. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18480.) Existing project. Provides for: jetty 15 feet high on easterly side of river mouth and a dike on westerly side, with a view of stabilizing entrance; channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending 2,000 feet upstream from deep water; basin 10 feet deep, 300 to 425 feet wide, and 2,400 feet long upstream of -29-6- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT channel; and, maintenance of an ocean spit. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at La Push is 8.3 feet. Extreme range is about 15 feet. The spit is nourished with dredged material in conjunction with channel dredging. The spit was rehabilitated with quarry rock in 1974, in 1979-80, and in 1982; in addition, a 500-foot breakwater section paralleling the channel and extending the spit was constructed. In 1995, the revetment on the downstream end of the ocean spit was extended 200 feet. In 1996, after the river breached the natural spit, the revetment on the ocean spit was extended approximately 1,700 feet to the north and the boat basin training wall was raised from elevation +9.0 to elevation +16.0 - all under O&M authority. Project was completed in February 1997. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There is one Quileute Tribe-owned dock at La Push, near the mouth of the Quillayute River. There is also a protected boat basin owned by the Quileute Tribe Port Authority which is used by fishing boats, pleasure craft, and the Coast Guard, which has a separate pier. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys were made of the river channel. Prepared plans and specifications for contract work. Advertised and awarded a dredging contract. Maintenance, contract: A maintenance dredging contract was completed. The entrance channel and boat basin were dredged (53,461 cy) at a cost of $435,164. A steel debris catcher for salmon protection was constructed at a cost of $25,116. A continuing contract for maintenance dredging of the entrance channel and boat basin and to construct a 70,000 cy settling basin was awarded. 15. SEATTLE HARBOR, WA Location. Harbor at Seattle, WA, includes all waterways within city limits. Chief anchorage basin is Elliott Bay, an arm of Puget Sound. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18450.) Existing project. Maintenance of East and West Waterways, 34 feet deep and 750 feet wide for 6,500 and 5,200 feet, respectively, from pierhead line in Elliott Bay; the 30-foot by 200-foot wide channel from West Waterway to 1st Avenue South Bridge, and the 20-foot by 150-foot-wide channel from 1st Avenue South Bridge to 8th Avenue; dredging Duwamish Waterway 150 feet by 15 feet from 8th Avenue to a point about 1.4 miles above 14th Avenue South Bridge, and turning basin 500 by 250 feet and 15 feet deep at the upper end of the waterway; maintenance of East Waterway between upper end of 750-foot section and Spokane Street, 34 feet deep, 700 feet long and 400 feet wide, and a turning basin, including head of East Waterway at junction of waterways south of Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad bridge, to 30 feet deep, after these sections of waterway are dredged by local interests to full project dimensions. Total length of all waterways included in project is about 7.5 miles. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.3 feet. Extreme tidal range is 19.3 feet. Project was completed in 1931, excluding maintenance of East Waterway above the 750-foot section. Turning basin, constructed under authority of R&H Act of Mar. 3, 1925, in 20-foot deep waterway was deauthorized by P.L. 99-662 dated Nov. 17, 1986. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1932.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local sponsor has no maintenance responsibility. Terminal facilities. There are 203 piers, wharves, and docks located on the inner and outer harbors at Seattle, WA. Salmon Bay, Lake Union, Portage Bay and Lake Washington form the inner harbor; Elliott Bay and East, West and Duwamish Waterways form the outer harbor. (Lake Washington Ship Canal, a part of the inner harbor, is a separate project in this report.) These terminals serve a variety of purposes which include cargo handling, bunkering vessels, ferry service (vehicular, passenger and rail car), marine repair/ outfitting/ drydocking/ conversion, shipbuilding, handling supplies and equipment, and mooring company owned equipment, excursion vessels, fire boats, fishing vessels, government equipment, harbor craft/tugs, and oceanographic research vessels. The numerous waterfront facilities in the port used exclusively by recreational craft are not included. (See Port Series No. 36, revised 1993.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys were made of channels. A Congressionaldirected study continued to deepen the East Waterway up to elevation -51.0 under O&M authority, if feasible. Sediment sampling/testing was conducted in preparation for upstream maintenance dredging. Maintenance, contract: None. 16. SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA Location. An inland passage, 11 miles long, between Saratoga Passage and Padilla Bay, in northwestern part of Washington, about 60 miles north of Seattle. (See NOAA Survey Charts 18400, 18427 and 18421.) Existing project. A channel 100 feet wide and 12 feet deep for 11 miles from deep water in Saratoga Passage to deep water in Padilla Bay, by dredging and dike construction where necessary; and removal of protecting rocky points of McGlinn and Fidalgo Islands obstructing navigation at "Hole-in-the- Wall". Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.5 feet at south end of channel, 8.4 feet at north end, and 10 feet at La Conner. Extreme tidal range is about 19.5 feet at -29-7- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1998 south end of channel and about 16 feet at north end. Project was completed in March 1965. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1965.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 18 wharves, docks, and piers on Swinomish Channel, all but 3 of which are privately owned. Of these, one is used for handling general cargo; five are used exclusively for moorage, unloading and servicing of fishing vessels; two are used for handling petroleum products; three facilities are used for log dumps; and two for handling nonmetallic minerals. Three publicly owned facilities for launching, mooring, and servicing small craft are within the city limits of La Conner. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Maintained project coordination with Port of Skagit County, Port of Anacortes, U.S. Coast Guard, and navigation users. Channel condition surveys were conducted. Monitored dredging contract. Maintenance, contract: Maintenance dredging of 46,789 cy with open water disposal was completed in August at a total cost of $256,550. 17. WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR AND NASELLE RIVER, WA Location. Willapa Harbor consists of lower reaches of Willapa River and Bay, an inlet of Pacific Ocean about 30 miles north of mouth of Columbia River in Washington. Willapa River rises about 30 miles east of harbor, flows generally westerly, and empties into the bay. Naselle River enters the bay near its southerly end. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18504.) Existing project. Provides for: channel over bar at mouth of Willapa Bay, 26 feet deep and at least 500 feet wide; channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide from deep water in Willapa Bay to foot of Ferry Street at South Bend, thence 300 feet wide to westerly end of narrows, thence 250 feet wide to forks of river at Raymond, including a cutoff channel 3,100 feet long at narrows and a closing dike at Mailboat Slough; channel 24 feet deep and 150 feet wide up south fork to deep basin above Cram Lumber Mill, and up north fork to 12th Street, with a turning basin 250 feet wide, 350 feet long, and 24 feet deep at latter point; channel 10 feet deep and 40 feet wide from deep water in Palix River to Bay Center dock, with widening at shoreward end to provide a small mooring basin; mooring basin 15 feet deep, 340 feet wide, and 540 feet long adjacent to port wharf at Tokeland; entrance channel at Nahcotta 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide, and mooring basin 10 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 1,150 feet long, protected by a rubblemound breakwater about 1,500 feet long; and removal of snags, piles, and other obstructions in navigable channel of Naselle River between Naselle and mouth. Project includes about 26 miles of channel from entrance through Willapa River forks, 2,800 feet of Palix River-Bay Center channel, and 9 miles of Naselle River upstream of U.S. Highway 101 Bridge. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.9 feet at Toke Point, 9.9 feet at Raymond, 8.9 feet at Bay Center, and 10.8 feet near Naselle. Extreme range is 18 feet at Toke Point, 19.3 feet at Raymond, 16 feet at Bay Center, and 18 feet near Naselle. Project was completed in November 1958. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1959. For details relating to previous projects, see page 968 of Annual Report for 1910, page 2001 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1861 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 24 wharves on Willapa River and Harbor, including 5 in Willapa Bay, 4 in Bay Center, 12 in Raymond and South Bend, and 1 in Tokeland. Two of the wharves at Raymond and South Bend are suitable for use by ocean-going vessels. One of these is publicly owned and operated as a general cargo terminal, and one is located at a sawmill. The other wharves, including three which are publicly owned and operated, are used by shallow-draft vessels. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Frequent condition surveys on the Willapa bar channel were performed at the request of the U.S. Coast Guard. The alignment of the Willapa bar thalweg continues to be a problem for safe navigation. Completed plans and specifications for Toke Point maintenance dredging. A partnership agreement with the Port of Willapa Harbor was executed April 3, 1998. The agreement allowed the Corps to initiate a $2,000,000 technical study at Willapa Bay to determine if a safe, reliable bar navigation channel is feasible. Final study recommendations are scheduled in July 1999. Maintenance, contract: A Toke Point entrance channel clamshell maintenance dredging contract was awarded in September. Beach Erosion Control 18. LUMMI SHORE ROAD, WA Location. Project is located just west of the city of Bellingham on the Lummi Indian Reservation in Whatcom County, Washington. Existing project. Provides for construction of about 9,400 linear feet of rock revetment along Lummi Shore Road. Lummi Shore Road is in an area of extremely high shoreline erosion, and the erosion has caused a partial collapse of the road and threatens utilities located within the road right-ofway. Estimated total project cost is $3,258,000 ($1,777,000 Federal and $1,481,000 non-Federal). Estimated completion date is December 1998. -29-8- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT Local cooperation.Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (Lummi Indian Nation) will pay about 35% of project costs. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed February 19, 1998. Concurrent with subject project, the Lummi Indian Nation (with help from the Federal Highway Administration and Bureau of Indian Affairs) is planning to repair and improve about 4.7 miles of Lummi Shore Road and Lummi View Drive, bringing the roads up to current highway standards. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Completed plans and specifications, executed PCA, and supervised construction contract work. New work, contract Construction work under way by equipment rental contracs. Flood Control 19. CEDAR RIVER, RENTON, WA Location. Project is located along the lower 1 1/4 miles of the Cedar River in the city of Renton, King County, WA, immediately southeast of the city of Seattle. Existing project. Dredging of the lower river channel approximately four feet from the mouth upstream to Logan Avenue bridge (opie mile), gradually decreasing the slope upstream another 1/ mile to meet the existing grade. Levees and floodwalls to be raised along both banks from the mouth to Williams Avenue 1 1/4 miles to contain the 100 year flood just prior to redredging. The interval for maintenance dredging will be approximately 3 years on average. Estimated total project cost is $9,442,000 ($5,000,000 Federal and $4,442,000 non-Federal) with completion in September 1999. Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (city of Renton) will .pay 47% of project implementation costs. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed May 9, 1998. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Completed plans and specificaitons, executed PCA, and supervised construction contract work. New work, contract: Construction work under way by equipment rental contracts. 20. CHEHALIS RIVER AT SOUTH ABERDEEN AND COSMOPOLIS, WA Location. The Chehalis River, about 125 miles in length, rises in the Willapa Hills in west central Washington, flows east, then north and finally west to Grays Harbor on the coast. The cities of Aberdeen and Cosmopolis are located at the mouth of the Chehalis River in Grays Harbor County. The project is located on the left river bank (south side) in Aberdeen and Cosmopolis. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet, Aberdeen, WA, 1:24,000.) Existing project. The project, authorized in P.L. 99-662, as refined in the plans and specifications, provided standard project flood protection for most of the left bank flood plain (1,176 acres) at the mouth of the Chehalis River in the cities of Aberdeen and Cosmopolis. The improvement included segments of earthen embankment levee (2.0 miles) and steel sheet pile floodwall (1.1 miles), joining areas of high ground (1.2 miles). The project roughly follows the left bank of the Chehalis River from Devonshire Slough to Cosmopolis. Tide gates were provided where existing drainage channels cross the project alignment. Closure gates were provided to maintain road and rail access through the levee system. All work was completed in FY 1998. Final fiscal requirements remain. Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (city of Aberdeen assisted by the city of Cosmopolis) assumed 25 per cent of project costs. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed March 1, 1994. The local sponsor will provide operation and maintenance of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Prepared the operation and maintenance manual. New work, contract: None. 21. FLATHEAD RIVER, MT Location. Project is located on the north fork of the Flathead River in Montana, about one quarter of a mile south of the Canadian border. Existing project. Reconstruct at a new site /4 mile downstream a water monitoring station which was destroyed by the June 1995 flood. Restoring the station will continue its use as a long-record stream gaging site and monitor the quality of the water entering the United States from Canada. Seattle District has requested assistance from U.S. Geological Survey agency to perform the work. Estimated total project cost is $90,000. Estimated completion date is September 1999. Local cooperation. None required Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Prepared the necessary documents to engage services of U.S. Geological Survey agency. 22. HOWARD A. HANSON DAM, WA Location. Green River, in northwestern Washington, flows westerly for 40 miles to Auburn, thence northerly 32 miles to its mouth in Elliott Bay at Seattle. Dam is at river mile 64, 6 miles southeast of Kanaskat, and 1 mile downstream from -29-9- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1998 mouth of north fork. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet, "Cedar Lake Quadrangle, WA".) Existing project. Rockfill dam about 235 feet high, with gated spillway having a concrete weir at elevation 1,176 feet above mean sea level and top of gates at elevation 1,206, creating a reservoir with capacity of 106,000 acre-feet. Dam along crest is about 675 feet long. Project is designed to control flooding in Green River Valley to alleviate agricultural and urban flood damage, and make possible further expansion of Seattle industrial area. It also supplements Tacoma water supply which was included as a betterment. Project was completed in June 1963. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1963.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Operation continued all year. Routine maintenance was accomplished on roads, gages, debris booms, ditches, powerline, and other project features. Stilling basin inspection was accomplished. Work continued on water quality and sediment surveys. Maintenance, contract: None. Dam Safety Assurance. The reservoir outlet control tower and bridge were strengthened to withstand the maximum credible earthquake. Project was completed in FY 1998. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Monitored construction contract. New work, contract: Completed construction. 23. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections are made of federally constructed local flood protection projects which are maintained by local interests, and agencies responsible for their operation and maintenance are advised of any needed repairs. During the fiscal year inspections were made on Chehalis River at Aberdeen, Green River at Tukwila and Kent, Okanogan River at Omak and Oroville, Sammamish River at Redmond, Shelton Creek at Shelton, Skykomish and Wallace Rivers at Startup, and Yakima River at Yakima in Washington State; and Lightning Creek at Clark Fork and St. Joe River at St.Maries in Idaho. Fiscal year costs were $201,071. Total costs to date have been $1,733,584. 24. MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA Location. On White River, principal tributary of Puyallup River, near Mud Mountain, 28 miles above its confluence with Puyallup River, and 38 miles above mouth of Puyallup River. Dam is 6 miles upstream and southeast of Enumclaw, in northwestern Washington, and 38 miles east of Tacoma. (See Geological survey topographic sheet "Cedar Lake Quadrangle, Washington".) Existing project (including dam safety assurance improvements to date). Rockfill dam, 700 feet long at crest elevation, rises 432 feet above bedrock. Reservoir has storage capacity of about 106,000 acre-feet. Flood control outlet works are in right abutment and permit an authorized, controlled discharge of 17,600 cubic feet per second through two concrete-lined tunnels, with a maximum capacity discharge of 21,500 cfs. Uncontrolled discharge over the spillway is maximum capacity for 245,000 cubic feet per second. Project affords flood protection to White and Puyallup River Valleys and protects Tacoma industrial district in conjunction with Puyallup River project at Tacoma against floods about 50 percent greater than maximum discharge of record. Original project was completed in June 1953. To date, the Corps has constructed two vista areas, a picnic area, a wading pool, and playground adjacent to the project office, a reservoir access point for hunters and fishermen, and a 1,760- foot trail leading to the lower vista area. Installation of an approximately 400-foot-deep concrete cutoff wall in the core of the dam was completed in November 1990 under the major rehabilitation program. Under dam safety assurance, spillway walls were raised, the dam crest was heightened, river diversion facilities required for excavation for the new tower were completed, the 9-foot diameter and the 23-foot diameter tunnels were refurbished, and a new reservoir outlet tower was constructed. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Project features were operated all year. Maintenance was accomplished on dam facilities, intake structure, gages, debris booms, power lines, roads, ditches, hiking trails, vista observation deck, recreation area, and fish facilities. Approximately 4,747 fish were transported from the fish collection facility to the upstream release point. Project staff is partially renovating the 40-year-old administration building. Maintenance, contract: Hydraulic gates, lifting cylinders and controls are beingrefurbished under contract. Dam Safety Assurance. New work, hired labor: Study is ongoing to identify problem areas with the new dam safety features. New work, contract: Install steel armor on the floor of the mixing chamber (9-foot tunnel). 25. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS -29-10- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT Flood control storage space was available in Hungry Horse Reservoir, MT, Flathead Lake, MT (controlled by Kerr Dam), Grand Coulee project, WA, Wynoochee Dam, WA, Upper Baker and Ross Reservoirs, WA. Issues relating to project operations were addressed. Regulation instructions were provided for flood control operations. Guidance forecasts were made during the flood control season, as required. No Lost Valley storage replacement was requested at Rocky Reach, Priest Rapids, and Wells Dams. Daily and/or hourly data were collected and tabulated as required to check compliance with operating criteria. Coordination necessary in preparation or revision of reservoir regulation manuals was carried on during the year with agencies responsible for the operation of these projects. Fiscal year costs were $435,401. Total costs to date have been $5,159,455. 26. STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA Location. Formed by confluence of its north and south forks at Arlington, in northwestern Washington, Stillaguamish River flows westerly 22 miles to Puget Sound, entering Port Susan through Hat Slough and South Pass, and Skagit Bay through West Pass. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18441, and Geological Survey Quadrangles Stanwood, Marysville, and Stillaguamish, WA.) Existing project. Works to reduce bank erosion and channel changes on Stillaguamish River 15 miles between Arlington and head of Hat Slough, and on Cook Slough, 3 miles long, as follows: revetment at 26 places on river and Cook Slough; concrete weir (including a fishway) 275 feet long between steel sheet pile piers at head of Cook Slough to limit flow through Slough; and two cutoff channels, each about 900 feet long, to eliminate sharp bends in Cook Slough. Tidal influence extends about 3 miles into improved section. Flood stages of 16 feet above low water at Cook Slough weir have been observed. Project was completed in July 1939. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1940.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Utilized in-house labor to supervise removal of brush from the entire project along slopes of levee and construct rip rap repair. Maintenance, contract Awarded equipment rental contracts to achieve removal of brush and repair erosion damage with rip rap. 27. TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA. Location. Puyallup River has its source in glaciers on western slopes of Mount Rainier, flows northwesterly 50 miles, and empties into Commencement Bay, an arm of Puget Sound, at Tacoma, WA. Work covered by this project is on Puyallup River, within city limits of Tacoma. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18453.) Existing project. A channel with a capacity of 50,000 cubic feet per second between East 11th Street Bridge and lower end of inter-county improvement, a distance of about 2.2 miles, by straightening channel, building levees, revetting channel and levees, and making necessary bridge changes. The 11th Street Bridge at lower end of project is 0.75 mile above mouth of Puyallup River. Diurnal tidal range at mouth of river is 11.8 feet and extreme range is 20 feet. Project was planned in conjunction with Mud Mountain Dam and affords protection against floods about 50 percent greater than maximum discharge of record. A real estate design memorandum, approved by Office of the Chief of Engineers on October 2, 1985, changed the project boundary to allow the Port of Tacoma to create a wetland adjacent to the project. This action resulted in the Corps acquiring approximately 2,450 linear feet of setback levee in fee simple. Maintenance funds to cover the increased length of the project have been provided by the Port of Tacoma for the project life. Project was completed in May 1950. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1950.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor Utilized in-house labor to supervise removal of brush and noxious weeds from the entire project along slopes of levee. Coordinated annual clean-up with Citizens for a Healthy Bay, a tax-exempt, nonprofit organization.. Maintenance, contract: Awarded equipment rental contracts to achieve removal of brush and noxious weeds and to replace a drainage culvert. Multiple Purpose Power Projects 28. ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID Location. On Pend Oreille River about 25 miles west of Sandpoint, in northern Idaho, and 50 miles northeast of Spokane, WA. Dam is 838 and 90 miles upstream from mouths of Columbia and Pend Oreille Rivers, respectively. (See Geological Survey topographic sheets, Sandpoint, ID, and Newport, WA.) Existing project. Provides flood control, hydroelectric power, and related water uses on Pend Oreille River as a part of the multiple purpose plan for development of Columbia River Basin, including recreation development. At the dam, the river channel was formerly divided by an island and a low waterfall of about 7 feet. Dam is a gated, gravity-structure spillway in left channel and a powerhouse having an installation of 42,600 kilowatts in right channel, creating a reservoir with a usable storage capacity of 1,153,000 acre-feet. Project was completed in June 1957. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1957.) Recreational facilities for public use have been provided at Albeni Cove, Priest River, Riley Creek, Johnson Creek, Trestle Creek, Strongs Island, and Springy -29-11- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1998 Point. (Strongs Island was closed in FY 1982 to reduce O&M costs.) (Refer to Albeni Falls Master Plan dated June 1981 for further planned development.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Reservoir was operated through its annual cycle of storage and release. Routine structural, mechanical, and electrical maintenance was performed on spillways, dam, powerhouse, and equipment. Prescribed testing for power system reliability improvements continued with funds provided by Bonneville Power Administration (Section 2406). Maintenance, contract: Contracts for 13.8 KVA cable replacement, and paving of the transformer area, vista parking, and resource yard were completed. Contracts were awarded and completed in the FY for installation and testing of protective relays for units 1, 2, and 3, replacement of station drainage pump, fencing and surface gravel at island, re-routing and installation of new oil piping within powerhouse, and replacing 15KV cables from unit breakers to transformers for units, 1, 2, and 3. A continuing contract was awarded for project beautification. Contracts for spillway gate corrosion control and repairs to the Clark Fork debris area and bank protection continued. 29. CHIEF JOSEPH DAM - RUFUS WOODS LAKE, WA Location. On Columbia River in north central Washington, at River Mile 545, just upstream from mouth of Foster Creek, 1.5 miles upstream from town of Bridgeport. (Geological Survey topographic sheet, Okanogan, WA, shows general locality.) Existing project. A concrete gravity structure which consists of a 19-gate spillway and a 27-unit powerhouse. The powerhouse has sixteen 88,274 kilowatt and eleven 95,000 kilowatt generators with nameplate capacity of 2,457,384 kilowatts. Of the current construction project, work has been completed (in FY 1992) to bring turbine efficiency for units 17-27 up to design standards and the data acquisition and control system has been upgraded to Bonneville Power requirements. Estimated cost of current construction project is $395,855,000, with completion scheduled for FY 1999. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Supervised study work. New work, contract: Study of trunnion beam anchorages design criteria was completed and submitted for approval. Maintenance, hired labor: Project was operated all year, and routine maintenance work was performed. Prescribed testing for power system improvements continued with funds provided by Bonneville Power Administration (Section 2406). Maintenance, contract: Contracts for replacement of the turbine lubricating oil and right abutment seepage drain installation were completed. Contracts for crane modernization and pre-engineered metal building were awarded. 30. LIBBY DAM - LAKE KOOCANUSA, MT Location. On Kootenai River in Lincoln County, MT, about 17 miles upstream from Libby, and 219 miles upstream from confluence of Kootenai and Columbia Rivers. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet, Thompson Lakes, MT.) Existing project. Provides storage for local flood control protection in Montana and Idaho, and main stem flood control in Lower Columbia River, hydroelectric power generation atsite and at downstream plants through storage release. Project is operated as a unit of a comprehensive system for improvement of Columbia River basin for flood control, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes. Lake Koocanusa is 90 miles long, backing water 42 miles into Canada and has a usable storage capacity of 4,965,000 acrefeet at 50 percent drawdown. Construction of dam was in accordance with a treaty between United States and Canada relating to international cooperation in water resource development of the Columbia River basin. Dam is a straight concrete gravity overflow type, 420 feet high, 3,055 feet long, with normal full pool at elevation 2,459 feet above mean sea level. Powerhouse has an initial installed capacity of 420,000 kilowatts from four hydroelectric generating units. A fifth generating unit (Libby Additional Units Project) was completed in 1984 with an additional capacity of 105,000 kilowatts. Fabrication of generators for units 6 through 8 is completed and parts have been stored at the site. Project is completed with units 1 through 5 operational. Units 6 through 8 have been reclassified inactive. The Libby Reregulating Dam Project provides for construction of a reregulating dam about 10 miles downstream of Libby Dam. Funds were allocated for a construction start in 1977; however, courts have found that Congress did not authorize construction of the dam. In FY 1982, all work was terminated due to court direction. The Libby Reregulating Dam Power Units Project provides for installation of three hydroelectric generating units at the reregulating dam with 78,900 kilowatt installed capacity. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1995). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Reservoir was operated through its annual cycle of storage and release. Routine structural, mechanical, and electrical maintenance was performed on spillway dam, powerhouse and -29-12- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT equipment. Prescribed testing for power system reliability improvements continued with funds provided by Bonneville Power Administration (Section 2406). Maintenance, contract: Contracts for enclosure of the visitor center and construction of a project administration building were completed. Contracts were awarded for selective withdrawal gate refurbishment, 13 KV power cable run from powerhouse to maintenance building, and upper and lower wicket gate seals. Miscellaneous 31. MISCELLANEOUS WORK UNDER. SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were: Nahcotta, WA, $6,770; Oak Harbor, WA, $2,932; Port of Edmonds, WA, $3,026; Port of Port Townsend, WA, $6,289; Section 107 Coordination, $4,389; and Tulalip Bay, WA, $6,706, a total of $30,112. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). See Table 29-K Flood control activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were: Coeur d' Alene River (South Fork), ID, $35,812 (terminated); Murden Cove, WA, $0 (terminated); Section 14 Coordination, $14,360; and Upper Hoh Road, Forks, WA, $4,071; a total of $54,243. Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation.) Fiscal year costs were $2,792,637. This amount excludes $4,879 contributed funds expended. Project modifications for improvement of environment (Section 1135, Public Law 99-662, as amended). See Table 29-L. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration (Section 206, Public Law 104-303). Fiscal year costs were: Coordination account, $4,375; Goldsborough Creek, WA, $12,205; and Preliminary Restoration Plans, $7,862; a total of $24,442. 32. SAMMAMISH RIVER WEIR RESTORATION, WA Location. Project is located near upstream end of the Sammamish River in Redmond, WA, 22 miles northeast of Seattle, in Marymoor Park. The Sammamish River (length 13.7 miles) flows downstream from Lake Sammamish into Lake Washington. Existing project. Sammamish River Channel Improvements were constructed in 1965. Project provided major drainage improvement and flood protection for floods after March 1. The river channel was deepened an average of 5 feet and widened an average of 20 feet. Mouths of major tributaries were also deepened and widened. A previous Section 1135 project was completed in FY 1995 at three locations downstream of Redmond, WA. Features included regrading of banks, placement of low flow habitat enhancement elements, and planting of riparian trees and shrubs. Current project provides for modification of the grade control sill (weir) and the right bank of the river adjacent to the sill and upstream for 1,200 feet. Work provides fish passage improvements at the sill and a connected fish and wildlife habitat corridor from Lake Sammamish to the sill. Bank improvements additionally reduce severe bank erosion and water quality problems by channeling public access to designated areas. Estimated total project cost is $224,000 ($168,000 Federal and $56,000 non- Federal). Construction work was physically complete in August, with monitoring to continue for 3 years. Local cooperation. The local sponsor (King County) provided 25% of the project costs and is responsible for all operation and maintenance activities. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed on May 21, 1998. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Completed plans and specifications, assisted local sponsor in obtaining permits, provided routine coordination with local sponsor and resource agencies, executed PCA, supervised construction work and volunteer planting event. New work, contract Construction work was completed by equipment rental contract. 33. THORNTON CREEK, WA Location. Project is located in King County, at Lake Washington, in northeast Seattle, WA. Existing project. The project area consists of the portion of Matthews Beach Park which is south of Thornton Creek and which is frequently saturated. Restoration features include: 1) restoration of native riparian vegetation along lower 300 feet of the creek, 2) creation of a fish rearing pond adjacent to the creek with outflow to the creek, 3) diversion of water from a small creek at south end of the park in surface channel to supply pond, 4) planting of native vegetation around pond and along diversion (inflow) channel, 5) "softening" over a -29-13- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1998 lakeshore bulkhead with fill, root wads and rocks, and 6) human access and viewing areas. Estimated total project cost is $488,000 ($366,000 Federal and $122,000 non-Federal). Estimated completion date is September 30, 1999. Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (city of Seattle, Parks and Recreation Department) will pay 25% of project costs. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed September 4, 1998. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Completed plans and specifications, executed PCA, and initiated construction. New work, contract: Work under way by equipment rental contract. 34. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM (NEPP) Fiscal year costs were $113,755, provided for activities required for local and national preparedness. 35. GENERAL REGULATORY FUNCTIONS PROGRAM Permit Evaluation Enforcement Other Navigation Regulations Environmental Impact Statements TOTAL $2,552,652 592,289 3,979 1,565 $3,150,485 General Investigations 36. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $607,443 for navigation studies, $376,275 for flood damage prevention studies, $344,316 for special studies, $382,781 for review of authorized projects, $169,635 for miscellaneous activities, and $86,166 for coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests, a total of $1,966,616. In addition, contributed funds were expended for the following: $272,998 for navigation studies, $77,438 for flood damage prevention studies, $35,515 for special studies, $92,008 for review of authorized projects, and $63,564 for coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests, a total of $541,523. 37. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The work programmed for collection and study of basic data covers international water studies, flood plain management services, and hydrologic studies. Work on international water studies included checking Kootenay Lake storage computations to determine compliance of West Kootenay Power & Light Co. with orders of International Joint Commission, and coordination with International Kootenay Lake and Osoyoos Lake Boards of Control in enforcement of International Joint Commission orders. Technical assistance was provided other Federal and non-Federal agencies and Indian tribes in flood hazard evaluation, flood reduction methods, and related services as requested. Fiscal year costs were $37,091 for international water studies, $194,939 for flood plain management services, and $4,949 for hydrologic studies, a total of $236,979. In addition, $1,992 contributed funds were expended for flood plain management services. 38. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN See Table 29-H. Centralia, WA The city of Centralia lies in west central Washington at the confluence of the Chehalis and Skookumchuck Rivers, about midway along the Chehalis River from its source in the Willapa Hills to its mouth at Aberdeen at Grays Harbor. Floods of record on Skookumchuck, Newaukum, and Chehalis Rivers occurred in February 1996. The plan of improvement authorized in P.L. 99-662 would substantially reduce flooding in the Skookumchuck River valley for the 22 miles between Skookumchuck Dam and the river mouth and provide minor reductions along the Chehalis River downstream from Centralia for about 20 miles to Oakville. The improvement, as recommended in the feasibility report, consisted of structural modifications (flood control outlet tunnel and spillway gate) which would enable the existing, private water supply dam to provide flood control storage during winter months. The approximate 100-year flood on the Skookumchuck River at Centralia would be reduced from 13,300 cubic feet per second to 6,700 cubic feet per second (about a current 4-year flow). The 100-year flood level would be reduced by between 2 and 5 feet. Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) was started in FY 1988 to refine the project design recommended in the feasibility report. In FY 1990, refinement of project design to less costly gated spillway sluice and reevaluation of hydrology, existing local levees and embankments, estimated flood damages, and potential flood reduction benefits were completed. Studies determined that the Skookumchuck Dam modification no longer appeared economically justifiable and further work was suspended. In FY 1992 a wrap-up report -29-14- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT presenting results of the technical analyses to date was completed. Following the severe flooding in the Centralia-Chehalis area in 1996 there was a renewed local interest in flood damage reduction. Using state and local funding sources, Lewis County reviewed past study efforts and developed a revised flood damage reduction plan that would include the authorized dam modification combined with overbank excavation and flow bypass measures. The revised project appeared economically justified. In July 1998 Lewis County requested resumption of PED for the project with a view toward preparing a General Reevaluation Report and Environmental Impact Statement Supplement for an expanded project. Work resumed soon thereafter. Accomplishments during the fiscal year included completion of activities to resume PED. Fiscal year costs were $17,193. Total costs to date have been $1,560,193. Howard Hanson Dam, WA Howard Hanson Dam is an existing earthfill and rockfill structure located at river mile 64.5 on the Green River, King County, WA, 35 miles southeast of Seattle and 35 miles northeast of Tacoma. Work under Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) commenced in FY 1998 to refine the project design recommended in the feasibility report. Accomplishments during the FY include coordination with the local sponsor (city of Tacoma Water Division) and initiating work on PED cost share agreement. Fiscal year costs were $10,620. -29-15- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1998 TABLE 29-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total To In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 1. Anacortes Harbor, WA New Work (Federal Funds) Approp . 222,345 (Contrib. Funds) 2. Ediz Hook, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 3. Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 4. Friday Harbor, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 5. Grays Harbor and Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work 20,000 _ _ 22,383 - 5,000 569,000 _ 5,315 561,741 87,549 25,988 173,000 1,052,000 815,117 185,613 912,490 933,473 _ 75,000 1,443 70,823 6,000 2,624 11,000 8,866 10,000 12,160 44,124 1,559,000 1,562,712 2,581 222,345 1,207,499 1,205,365 59,524 59,524 5,000 5,000 5,878,740 5,878,740 2,085,860 2,080,646 385,850 385,850 251,314 229,501 1,723,745 1,723,745 16,400,924 16,382,306 116,618 116,618 548,090 584,090 1,575,500 1,575,500 160,952 155,151 1,267,881 1,267,881 -29-16- TABLE 29-A SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total To In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 Chehalis River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 6. Grays Harbor, Point Chehalis, WA 7. Kenmore Navigation Channel, WA 8. Lake Crockett, WA 9. Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 10. Neah Bay, WA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work -1,393,000 29,000 150,878 71,525 1,822 2,060 76,000 45,369 5,750,682 7,385,000 5,731,000 6,030,289 7,560,155 5,802,808 14,856 17,270 49,225 38,064 9,173,000 6,127,575 22,353,186 5 22,303,414 6 147,061,023 144,002,765 7 9,592 9,592 28,000 25,000 47,403 25,841 29,000 14,073 12,766 4,606,145 4,606,145 6,096,000 6,078,439 55,889 55,889 440,000 835,000 426,099 845,780 _ 100,000 251,000 95,530 249,289 5,408,000 6,552,000 7,349,000 5,739,774 6,419,843 7,427,043 40,000 96,000 73,109 130,000 134,424 216,000 204,294 6,345,750 6,364,615 39,964 1,431,000 1,404,988 946,000 946,000 925,344 923,572 377,990 377,990 1,179,610 1,167,904 4,611,436 4,611,436 130,056,845 129,898,291 7,465,230 7,465,230 250,000 250,000 10 11 12 40,000 39,964 -29-17- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1998 TABLE 29-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total To In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 11. Olympia Harbor, WA 13. Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, WA 14. Quillayute River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 15. Seattle Harbor, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 16. Swinomish Channel, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 17. Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, WA (Federal Funds) Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost _ 20,000 11,273 4,000 4,396 16,000 16,223 4,000 2,479 878,000 771,000 1,000,000 928,152 756,492 954,534 824,000 4,426,000 6,663,584 821,057 4,373,188 6,641,436 152,000 608,000 529,000 132,759 622,598 543,729 - -2,120 415,000 487,395 238,000 728 234,383 379,248 379,248 -29-18- 209,000 215,328 35,000 33,177 2,057,266 2,057,266 2,083,058 2,080,659 337,709 337,709 823,177 819,382 13 14 43,337 43,337 898,000 962,993 25,686,750 25,680,796 15 16 521,850 521,850 1,206,000 1,245,470 24,708,892 24,664,299 20,000 20,000 170,335 170,335 1,230,000 1,180,241 238,000 239,049 12,460,373 12,402,872 69,333 69,333 94,475 94,475 808,332 808,332 8,535,972 8,532,319 32,000 32,000 379,248 379,248 1,386,955 1,386,955 17 18 SEATTLE. WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 29-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total To In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 (Contrib. Funds) 18. Lummi Shore Road, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 19. Cedar River, Renton, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 20. Chehalis River at South Aberdeen and Cosmopolis, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 21. Flathead River, MT 22. Howard A. Hanson Dam, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 24. Mud Mountain Dam, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 26. Stillaguamish River, WA (Federal Funds) Mant. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. 457,624 127,000 546,383 449,853 137,329 553,263 2,490,000 1,487,978 18,073,743 17,066,526 78,372 78,372 134,000 86,677 54,238 27,011 43,000 89,449 36,200 47,483 211,500 135,000 179,844 149,242 174,300 121,800 79,179 111,316 102,000 52,978 271 16,215 77,500 88,897 31,900 137,287 2,559,000 2,000,000 202,000 2,505,057 2,918,976 253,896 1,183,907 320,000 851,504 642,562 50,000 58,193 1,677,000 513,059 972;600 154,966 2,480,011 1,315,128 1,617,000 833,290 18,000 29,966 360 50,000 15,000 300,000 260,299 900,000 50,399 936,177 969,000 1,133,000 1,100,000 963,819 1,099,914 1,123,583 13,700 - 13,700 7,609,000 -695,000 271,000 7,212,186 729,832 181,214 1,763,318 1,908,000 1,909,000 1,846,166 1,891,311 1,857,312 3,773 4,474 924,426 972,991 -3,958 -3,958 842,227 867,658 1,774,823 1,790,974 2,002,000 785,961 1,064,347 246,713 2,964,011 1,793,043 1,945,000 1,161,072 8,283,000 8,277,007 1,553,907 1,552,619 50,000 15,000 38,311,834 38,311,834 20 22 20,513,755 20,468,416 23 2,009,742 2,009,742 81,988,075 24 81,858,255 25 35,841,139 35,731,958 26 285,908 285,908 30,437,500 30,437,500 3,928 - 3,928 134,595 -29-19- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1998 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total To In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 Cost 134,595 (Contrib. Funds) 27. Tacoma, Puyallup River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 28. Albeni Falls Dam, ID 29. Chief Joseph Dam- Rufus Woods Lake, WA 30. Libby Dam - Lake Koocanusa, MT (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 32. Sammamish River Weir Restoration, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 33. Thornton Creek, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 156,000 132,000 145,000 181,145 130,130 146,279 59,000 79,000 106,000 59,947 77,377 105,642 425 5,595,000 4,567,000 5,366,568 5,767,752 4,330,034 5,277,760 -278,000 182,000 246,000 711,438 774,334 173,193 10,361,000 11,953,000 12,592,890 10,533,162 11,718,716 12,285,641 183,000 184,132 71,000 71,934 24,055 5,011,487 4,587,411 -176,000 -108,174 12,716,493 12,647,268 27 3,481,523 3,480,665 21,000 21,000 3,947,853 3,947,853 1,127,367 1,126,257 54,405 31,816 31,741,561 31,741,561 29 79,697,525 30 78,807,533 31 540,346,235 32 540,320,691 33 196,571,921 34 195,766,208 35 297,630 297,630 S 543,726,140 - 543,726,140 5,755,000 6,195,000 8,623,021 8,426,342 6,329,562 8,562,756 _ 6,000 68,000 _ 2,216 64,299 10,000 77,000 49,000 2,077 84,402 39,472 6,926,169 6,943,323 112,000 77,479 38,250 25,764 162,500 30,768 106,700 36 90,309,892 37 90,119,745 38 1,458,252 1,458,252 186,000 143,994 38,250 25,764 298,500 156,719 106,700 -29-20- TABLE 29-A SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT 1. Excludes $2,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 2. Includes $418,209 appropriated and expended for previous project. Excludes $43,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 3. Includes $5,869 for previous project and $120,000 for Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters, appropriated and expended. 4. Includes $1,180,500 expended under Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L.98-8). 5. Includes $22,115,107 appropriated for all projects (current project is $17,233,225 including $3,530,000 PED), $124,945 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710), and $113,134 for previous project. Excludes $161,909 Navy funds and $6,000 Coast Guard funds. 6. Includes $22,065,335 expended for all projects (current project is $17,183,453 including $3,530,000 PED), $124,945 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710), and $113,134 for previous project. Excludes $161,909 Navy funds and $6,000 Coast Guard funds. 7. Includes $37,415 appropriated and expended for previous project. Excludes $409,660 Emergency Relief funds and $57,000 Public Works Administration funds expended. 8. Excludes $111,000 Public Works Acceleration Act funds expended. 9. Excludes $3,418,000 contributed by Port of Grays Harbor in fulfilling requirements of local cooperation. 10. Includes $117,750 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 11. Includes $779,655 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710) and $485,002 for previous project, appropriated and expended. Excludes $246,567 expended by State of Washington and $742,071 expended by King County. Excludes $192,516 Public Works Administration funds expended. 12. Includes $1,631,195 (1916 to 1936) and $338,163 subsequently appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 13. Includes $183,257 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $105,467 Public Works Administration funds expended. 14. Includes $14,418 appropriated and expended for previous projects. 15. Includes $64,996 appropriated and expended for previous project. 16. Excludes Navy funds expended on dredging river channel in 1944 and Coast Guard funds expended for channel dredging in 1948 and 1949. 17. Excludes $1,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 18. Includes $228,084 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $40,000 Coast Guard funds and $192,314 Emergency Relief funds expended. 19. Includes $309,177 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $78,532 Public Works Administration funds expended. 20. Includes $6,597 expended for previous projects. 21. Includes $2,212,000 for Preconstruction Engineering and Design, appropriated and expended. 22. Includes $37,048,061 appropriated and expended for original project and $1,263,773 appropriated and expended for Dam Safety Assurance. 23. Includes $66,678 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Darns and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 24. Includes $13,182,063 appropriated for original project, $$7,785 appropriated for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710) and $68,718,227 appropriated for Dam Safety Assurance. Excludes $26,000 Emergency Relief funds. 25. Includes $13,182,063 expended for original project, $87,785 expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710) and $68,588,407 expended for Dam Safety Assurance. Excludes $26,000 Emergency Relief funds expended. 26. Includes $198,578 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 27. Excludes $281,000 Works Progress Administration funds and $85,999 Emergency Relief funds expended. 28. Includes $5,035 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 29. Includes $30,769,614 for original project and $971,947 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710), appropriated and expended. Excludes $136,736 Public Works Acceleration Act funds expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 30. Includes funds appropriated for project O&M ($76,924,748), Special Recreation Use Fees ($174,776), Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters ($1,875,446), and BPA direct funding ($722,555). 31. Includes funds expended for project O&M ($76,730,446), Special Recreation Use Fees ($174,776), Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters ($1,875,446), and BPA direct funding ($26,865). 32. Includes $144,338,252 appropriated for original project, $395,860,000 for additional units, and $147,983 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). Excludes $58,000 Public Works Acceleration Act funds for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 33. Includes $144,338,252 expended for original project, $395,834,455 for additional units, and $147,983 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). Excludes $58,000 Public Works Acceleration Act funds for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 34. Includes funds appropriated for project O&M ($195,301,977), Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters ($774,561), and BPA direct funding ($495,383). 35. Includes funds expended for project O&M ($194,755,293), Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters ($774,561), and BPA direct funding ($236,354). 36. Includes $484,753,143 appropriated and expended for original project, $42,221,634 for additional units, $16,276,363 for reregulating dam, and $475,000 for power planning. 37. Includes funds appropriated for project O&M ($87,637,500), Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters ($2,592,702), and BPA direct funding ($79,690). 38. Includes funds expended for project O&M ($87,506,003), Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters ($2,592,702), and BPA direct funding ($21,040). 39. Excludes $161,849 expended by Federal Aviation Agency, $32,000 expended by Lincoln County- City of Libby Joint Airport Board, $8,000 expended by Bonneville Power Administration, and $379,555 expended by U.S. Forest Service. -29-21- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1998 TABLE 29-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. ANACORTES HARBOR, WA Channel in Capsante Waterway. Mooring Basin. Navigation Channel. 2. H. Doc 1117, 64t Cong., 1" sess. S. Doc. 102, 83"' Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 107, P.L.86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Dec. 31, 1974 H. Doc. 101, 93d Cong., 1st Sess., P.L. 93-251 Mar. 2, 1919 Sep 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 as amended Mar. 7, 1974 -29-22- 3. EDIZ HOOK, WA Construction of 10,000 linear feet of rock revetment, together with initial beach replenishment and annual nourishment. Emergency interim measures necessary to prevent breaching of Ediz Hook prior to construction of authorized project. EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA Training dike 10,500 feet long extending across bar at outlet of old river channel. Raise 6,000 feet of training dike, extend spur dike, widen gap in dike as required, maintain East Waterway and channel to gap. Abandon project for Snohomish River and redesignate as Everett Harbor and Snohomish River. Provide settling basin near 14th Street. Construct spur dike at Preston Point, remove training dike north of river outlet, enlarge channel to 14th Street, and deepen settling basin. Widen channel from settling basin to gap; extend channel to head of Steamboat Slough; and a settling basin within upper channel reach. FRIDAY HARBOR, WA Construction of 1,600 feet of concrete floating breakwater. GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA South jetty. A north jetty 9,000 feet long. The 18-foot channel. Extend north jetty 7,000 feet; length of south jetty fixed at 13,734 feet. A. 6-foot channel above Cosmopolis. Dredging in bar channel. Dredging in bar channel. Reconstruct north and south jetties to an elevation of 16 feet above mean lower low water. Maintain 26-foot channel below Aberdeen (as authorized by Public Works Administration Dec. 11, 1933) and combining projects for Grays Harbor and bar entrance and Grays Harbor, inner portion, and Chehalis River under a modified project for Grays Harbor and Chehalis River. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Maintain 30-foot depth in channel from deep water in Grays Harbor to Port of Grays Harbor Commission terminal which was deepened from 26 to 30 feet with Navy funds. 14-foot channel to Bay City; breakwater at Westhaven; and maintenance of Westhaven entrance channel. Dredging and maintenance of a 30-foot channel and turning basin from Aberdeen to Cosmopolis. Additional breakwater, 1,400 feet long, at Westhaven Cove. Westhaven Cove small boat basin. 4. 5. H. Doc. 1108, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 377, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 546, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 569, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 348, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers July 9, 1981. Annual Report, 1895, pp. 3517-3533. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 507, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 29, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1125, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1729, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 582, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 53, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 78-534 Report in Office, Chief of Engineers H. Doc. 635, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 412, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 30, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 7, 1979 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 June 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 July 14, 1960 as amended June 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 as amended SEATTLE WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 29-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Cntinuedrl See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Nov. 17, 1986 Improve project features with accompanying fish mitigation. P.L. 99-662 Aug. 13, 1968 July 14, 1960 as amended Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended July 14,1960 as amended June 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 22, 1922 June 26, 1934 1 Aug. 30, 1935 2 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended July 24, 1956 June 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 GRAYS HARBOR, POINT CIIEHAUS, WA Periodic beach nourishment to protect the infrastructure of the community of Westport. KENMORE NAVIGATION CHANNEL, WA Construction of navigation channel 15 feet deep consisting of a 100-foot-wide inner channel 900 feet long, an 800-foot-long transition channel with 24 degree 30-foot bend and maximum width of 190 feet, and a 120-foot-wide outer channel 1,200 feet long. LAKE CROCKETT, WA Small-boat basin. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Change authorized channel depth from -18 mean lower low water to -25 mean lower low water by dredging. LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA Provides for a double lock and fixed dam with gated spillway and necessary accessory works at entrance to Salmon Bay, dredging a channel from locks to deep water in Puget Sound, and excavation by local interests of a channel from locks into Lake Washington. Dredging below locks and revetting canal banks. Increased dimensions of channel between Puget Sound and locks and a 600-foot extension of lower guide pier. Operating and care of locks and dam provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Enlarge channel between locks and Lake Washington. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Government Locks to be known as Hiram M. Chittenden Locks. NEAH BAY, WA Rubblestone breakwater. Reinforcement of existing revetment. OLYMPIA HARBOR, WA Channel 22 feet deep and 150 feet wide. Increase channel to 26-foot depth on east side of harbor. Elimination from project of 12-foot channel on east and west sides of harbor, and for a channel 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide between Budd Inlet and port terminal, Sec. 111, P.L. 90-483 Authorized by Chief of Engineers Sep. 7, 1995. Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers Oct. 7, 1980. H. Doc. 303, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 78-534 Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Nov. 7, 1988. H. Doc. 953, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 800, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 324, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 140, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 78-534 P.L 84-779 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 51, 75th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 404, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 244, 69th Cong. 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 71st Cong., lst Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doec. 21, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. -29-23- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1998 TABLE 29-B (Continued) See Date Section Authe in Text Act AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION orizing Aug. 26, 1937 July 14, 1960 as amended July 13, 1892 13. 14. July 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 15. 16. 17. July 13, 1892 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 July 27, 1916 Aug. 30, 1935 2 Aug. 30, 1935 4 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Project and Work Authorized with turning basin of same depth. Widen outer portion of channel to 500 feet, and widen entrance to turning basin. 656-foot concrete floating breakwater and dredging of entrance and access channels and turning basin. PUGET SOUND AND ITS TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA Maintenance of the rivers tributary to Puget Sound by snagging and dredging, and removal of floating debris from Seattle Harbor. QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA Jetty (5 feet high) on easterly side of mouth, and a dike on westerly side, to stabilize entrance. Maintenance dredging to provide a channel 6 feet deep and of suitable width from ocean to within river mouth. Raising jetty to 15 feet; channel 10 by 100 feet, 2,000 feet long; moorage basin. 3 SEATTLE HARBOR, WA Maintenance of East and West Waterways 750 feet wide and 34 feet deep, and of Duwamish Waterway 20 feet deep and 150 feet wide as far south as Eighth Avenue South Bridge. Enlargement of Duwamish Waterway. Maintenance of East Waterway between 750-foot section and Spokane Street, and turning basin at junction of East and Duwamish Waterways. SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA Channel 4 feet deep and 100 feet wide, and dike construction. Enlargement of channel to present project dimensions. Removal of navigation hazards at "Hole-in-the-Wall". WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR AND NASELLE RIVER, WA Channel 24 feet deep, 200 feet wide, in Willapa River, and 150 feet wide in the forks. Maintenance of channel over bar to a depth of 26 feet and minimum width of 500 feet. For cutoff channel at Narrows. Channel from deep water in Palix River to Bay Center dock. Widen Willapa River channel to 360 and 250 feet between South Bend and the forks; Tokeland and Nahcotta basins; and Naselle River clearance. Willapa River and Harbor redesignated as Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River. Documents Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 75, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers May 13, 1981. Annual Report for 1893, page 3425 H. Doc. 125, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 218, 78th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 579, 81st Cong., 2d Sess S. Doc. 313, 65th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 108, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 126, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 211, 72d Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 31, 52d Cong., 1st Sess. and Annual Report for 1892, p. 2752 S. Committee Print, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 499, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 706, 63d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 37, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 481, 76th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 425, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. -29-24. SEATTLE. WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 29-B (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act 18. Oct. 23, 1962 as amended 19. June 30,1948 as amended 20. 21. 22. 24. 26. Nov. 17, 1986 Oct 12, 1996 May 17, 1950 Aug. 6, 1958 June 22, 1936 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended June 22, 1936 June 28, 1938 June 22, 1936 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended May 17, 1950 Dec 22, 1944 as amended July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 July 9, 1952 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended 27. 29. AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized LUMMI SHORE ROAD, WA Construction of 9,400 linear feet of rock revetment along Lummi Shore Road. CEDAR RIVER, RENTON, WA Dredging of lower river channel and raising of levees and floodwalls along both river banks: CHEHALIS RIVER AT SOUTH ABERDEEN AND COSMOPOLIS, WA Constriction of storm damage and high tide reduction/ interior drainage dike, a 4.2-mile levee and tide gate system. FLATHEAD RIVER, MT Complete the reestablishment of an operational monitoring station on the north fork of the Flathead River. HOWARD A. HANSON DAM, WA Eagle Gorge flood control dam on Green River. Redesignation of project as Howard A. Hanson Dam. MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA Flood control dam on White River. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA Improvement of flood channel by clearing and bank revetment at 26 sites; concrete weir at head of Cook Slough; and 2 cutoff channels in Cook Slough. Maintenance of improvements. TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA Channel improvement to protect people and industrial section of city of Tacoma. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID Multi-purpose dam with powerhouse. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. CHIEF JOSEPH DAM - RUFUS WOODS LAKE, WA Multi purpose dam and powerhouse on Columbia River at Foster Creek. Redesignation of the project as Chief Joseph Dam. Designation of reservoir as Rufus Woods Lake. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Documents Sec. 103, P.L. 87-874. Authorized by Chief of Engineers June 22, 1998 Sec. 205, P.L. 80-858 Authorized by Chief of Engineers June 1, 1998 P.L. 99-662. P.L. 104-303 H. Doc. 271, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 85-592 S. Committee Print, Puyallup River, WA, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 78-534. H. Doc. 657, 71st Cong., 3d Sess. P.L. 75-761 S. Committee Print, Puyallup River, WA, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 78-534. S. Doc. 9, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 78-534. H. Doc. 693, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 858, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 469, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 78-534. -29-25- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1998 TABLE 29-B (Continued) See Date Section Autha in Text Act Oct. 2 as am! May 4 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION orizing 2, 1976 ended 4, 1977 Project and Work Authorized School facilities for education of dependents of construction personnel. May 17, 1950 Nov. 7, 1966 Jan. 2, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 Dec. 31, 1970 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Oct. 22, 1976 Nov. 17, 1988 Nov. 17, 1986 30. LIBBY DAM - LAKE KOOCANUSA, MT Multi-purpose dam and powerhouse, and reregulating facilities. School facilities for education of dependents of construction personnel, Libby project. Airport facility at Kelley Flats, MT. Design standards for relocation of Montana State Highway 37 to be those adopted by State of Montana pursuant to provisions of Highway Safety Act of 1966. Participation with State of Montana in construction, operation and maintenance of fish hatchery facilities. Designation of lake formed by the waters impounded by Libby Dam as Lake Koocanusa. Design and construction of sewage collection and sewage treatment facility as part of relocation of municipal facilities of Rexford, MT; and compensation for railroad employees suffering long-term economic injury through reduction of income as result of the relocation of rail transportation facilities due to the construction of Libby Dam. Phase I design memorandum stage for installation of power generating facilities at Libby Reregulating Dam. Construction of fish production measures to compensate for fish losses attributed to the project, and for acquisition of necessary real estate, construction of access roads and utilities (amends P.L. 91-282 by increasing limitation from $750,000 to $4,000,000). Acquisition of land (not to exceed $2,000,000) for prevention of wildlife grazing losses caused by the project. Reimbursement (not to exceed $350,000) to Boundary County, ID, for reconstruction of Deep Creek Bridge made necessary by duration of high flows during drawdown operations at Libby Dam. Compensation (not to exceed $1,500,000) to Drainage Districts and owners of leveed and unleveed lands in Kootenai Plats, Boundary County, ID, for damages caused by duration of higher flows during drawdown operations at Libby Dam. Amends P.L. 93-251 by increasing limitation from $350,000 to $380,000 for reimbursement to Boundary County, ID, for reconstruction of Deep Creek Bridge. Alleviate low water impact on existing facilities and protect Indian archeological sites exposed during course of operations, at an estimated cost of $750,000. SAMMAMISH RIVER WEIR RESTORATION, WA Modification of the grade control sill (weir) and the right bank of the river adjacent to the sill and upstream for 1,200 feet. -29-26- H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 89-789 P.L. 90-239 5 P.L. 90-483 6 P.L. 91-282 7 P.L. 91-625 P.L. 91-611 S.Doc. 29, 93d Cong., 1st Sess., P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 94-587 H. Doc. 1098, 100th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 100-676 Sec. 1135, P.L. 99-662 Authorized by Chief of Engineers Documents P.L. 94-587 P.L. 95-26 32. SEATTLE. WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 29-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents June 1, 1998 33. THORNTON CREEK, WA Nov. 17, 1986 Restoration features include planting vegetation, Sec. 1135, P.L. 99-662 creating a fish pond, water diversion, "softening" Authorized by Chief of Engineers over a bulkhead, and provide human access and viewing areas. Sep. 21, 1998 1. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 5. Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1968, 2. Included in Public Works Administration program. Section 502. 3. Maintenance of these items, as well as sandspit north of 6. Flood Control Act of 1968, Section 212. James Island, is included in this modification. 7. River Basin Monetary Authorization and Miscellaneous Civil 4. Included in Emergency Relief program, May 28, 1935. Works Amendments Act of 1970, Section 7. TABLE 29-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep,. 30.1998 Full Report Operation See Annual And Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance .. f . . . /. . . . . . . .. . .. . . .. n w. . w. . w. . Anacortes Navigation Channel, WA 1 Bellingham Harbor, WA Bellingham Harbor, WA (I&J Street Waterway)1 Blaine Harbor, WA Columbia River, Wenatchee to Kettle Falls, WA East Bay Small Boat Basin, Olympia, WAl Edmonds Harbor, WA2 Flathead River, MT Hammersley Inlet, WA Hoquiam River, WA Keystone Harbor, Admiralty Inlet, WAI Kingston Harbor, WA Kootenai River, ID and MT Mats Mats Bay, WA1 Neah Bay, WAl Okanogan and Pend Oreille Rivers, WA Polson Bay, Flathead Lake, MT Port Angeles Harbor, WA3 Port Gamble Harbor, WA Port Orchard Bay, WA4 Port Townsend, WA Prototype Breakwater Test Program, WA1 Shilshole Bay, Seattle, WA Skagit River, WA Squalicum Small Boat Harbor, Bellingham, WA1 Tacoma Harbor, WA Waterway Connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay, WA Westhaven Cove Small Boat Basin, WAl Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Abandoned Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1977 1996 1966 1958 1923 1985 1987 1901 1950 1950 1993 1967 1933 1970 1997 1913 1918 1960 1953 1928 1987 1985 1962 1950 1981 1992 1987 1981 825,263 1,566,839 125,634 346,650 274,391 1,619,956 9,811 9,000 18,921 264,000 262,570 9,255 137,679 3,874,920 63,879 4,491 470,873 11,911 42,804 480,899 1,461,590 2,575,091 102,330 1,744,025 2,383,891 73,322 2,000,000 5 68 9 10 11 12 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 3,090,256 - 7,693 224,756 - 10,683 5,316 5,000 5,643 7,634 259 13,337 78,787 - 36,258 1,537,150 378,753 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 107, Public Law 86-645. 2. Constructed by local interests at a cost of $415,000. Excludes $1,000 Coast Guard funds expended for new work. Corps of Engineers is responsible for maintenance. 3. Maintenance by Port of Port Angeles. 4. No maintenance required. 5. Excludes $457,200 contributed funds expended. 6. Includes $56,582 appropriated and expended for previous project. Excludes $13,000 Coast Guard funds and $29,421 contributed funds expended. 7. Includes $1,092 appropriated and expended for previous project. Excludes $9,103 contributed funds expended. 8. Excludes $2,500 Coast Guard funds expended. 9. Includes $8,005 appropriated and expended for previous project. 10. Excludes $2,184,766 contributed funds expended. 11. Excludes $32,373 Emergency Relief funds expended. 12. Excludes $114,272 contributed funds expended. -29-27- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1998 13. Excludes $390,753 contributed funds and $3,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 14. Mitigation of shore damages study. 15. Excludes $28,288 contributed funds and $9,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 16. Excludes $528,188 contributed funds expended. 17. Excludes $21,260 contributed funds expended. 18. Excludes $92,423 contributed funds expended. 19. Excludes $15,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 20. Includes $2,500 appropriated and expended for previous project. 21. Excludes $1,570,886 contributed funds expended. 22. Includes $159,585 appropriated and expended for previous project. Excludes $51,609 Public Works Administration funds expended and $1,147,208 contributed funds expended. 23. Includes $5,347 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $222,500 contributed funds expended. 24. Excludes $1,230,035 contributed funds expended. TABLE 29-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30. 1998 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Lincoln Park Beach, Seattle, WAl Completed 1997 $925,500 2 1. Authorized by Section 103, Public Law 87-874. 2. Excludes $391,126 contributed funds expended. TABLE 29-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to SeD. 30. 1998 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Status Report For Construction Funds American Lake, Vicinity of Fort Lewis, WA1 Bear Creek, Flathead CountyBridge, near Essex, MT2 Bitterroot River, Florence, MT2 Blackfoot River, Matt Little Road, MT2 Bogachiel River, Highway 101, near Forks, WA2 Bogachiel River, Undie Road, Forks, WA2 Cedar River, King County, WA3 Cedar River, Renton, WA2 Chehalis River, City of Chehalis Raw Water Pumphouse, WA2 Chehalis River, Independence Road, Thurston County, WA2 Chehalis River, Montesano, WA2 Clallam Bay, Sekiu, WA2 Clallam Bay at Sekiu, Clallam County, WA2 Clallam River, Highway 112, WA2 Clark Fork River, near Garrison, MT2 Clark Fork River, Drummond, MT2 Clark Fork River, Missoula, MT2 Clark Fork River, Superior, MT2 Clark Fork River, Vicinity of Plains, MT2 Clearwater River, Jefferson County Road, WA2 Clearwater River, Queets River Bridge, WA2 Coeur d'Alene, Spokane River, ID Coeur d'Alene River, Springston, ID2 Coffee Creek, WA3 Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1957 1971 1990 1964 1981 1981 1953 1949 1966 1965 1977 1977 1994 1981 1993 1978 1978 1971 1950 1968 1950 1941 1950 1966 59,582 1,424 180,950 17,836 156,000 57,000 3,229 32,264 35,454 47,916 140,080 48,698 178,800 43,500 80,611 18,660 31,548 28,357 27,947 50,000 49,165 152,872 25,452 15,000 10,000 49,759 39,818 16,973 24,728 -472 -29-28- OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS "tounnueTQ For Last Full Report See Annual Project Lete, Reoynvndr t iFvod'n r vv1938834 ,862aup ID, MT, and WA: Clark Fork River, Missoula, MT Lightning Creek, Clark Fork, ID Deschutes River, Gleason Road Bridge near Tumwater, WA2 Deschutes River, Rich Road Bridge, near East Olympia, WA2 Dungeness River, Area 5, WA2 Dungeness River, Area 8, WA2 Dungeness River, Clallam County, WAl Dungeness River, Sequim, WA2 Dungeness River, Clallam County, WA2 Dungeness River, Taylor Cut-off Road, WA2 Elwha Klallam Reservation, Elwha River, WA1 Elwha River, Clallam County, WA2 Entiat River, WA3 Entiat River, Chelan County, WA2 Flathead River, MT2 Flathead River, Bradley Channel Area, MT2 Flathead River, near Kalispell, MT1 Flathead River, near Kalispell, MIT2 Flathead River, Old Steel Bridge, near Kalispell, M'T2 Flower and Parmenter Creeks, MT 3 Foster Creek, West Fork, WA 2 Foster Creek Road, Douglas County, WA2 Green River between Kent and Auburn, WA and Allentown, WA2 Green River, State Highway 181, WA2 Henderson Bay, Purdy, WA2 Hoh River, County Road 216, WA2 Hoh River, U.S. Highway 101, WA2 Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1360)2 Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1361)2 Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1362)2 Hoh River, near Forks, WA2 Hoko River, Sekiu, WA2 Hood Canal, Hoodsport, WA2 Hoquiam River, WA2 Horseshoe Bend, WA1 Jackman Creek, Skagit River, WA 3 Kootenai River, Bonners Ferry, ID2 Kootenai River, Kootenai Flats Area, District #1, ID2 La Conner, Swinomish Channel, WA2 Lower Green River, King County, WA1 Lummi Shore Road, Whatcom County, WA2 Methow River, WA (MET 1-74)2 Methow River, WA (MET 2-74)2 Methow River, WA (MET 3-74)2 Methow River, Barclay Canal, WA2 Methow River, State Highway No. 16 Bridge, Twisp, WA2 Methow River, Twisp-Carlton Highway, Vicinity of Twisp, WA2 Methow River, Vicinity of Pateros, WA2 Mineral Creek, Lewis County, WA2 Missoula, MT (Sewage Treatment Plant)2 Moclips River, Moclips, WA2 Naches River, Naches, WA2 Neah Bay, Clallam County, WA2 Newaukum River, Lewis County, Hamilton, WA2 Nisqually River, near Elbe, WA2 Nisqually River, Thurston County, WA2 Nisqually River, Vicinity of Elbe, WA2 Nooksack River, WA3 Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Conntructinn 1983 1959 1965 1967 1950 1950 1964 1981 1986 1961 1991 1951 1971 1978 1972 1955 1995 1948 1964 1950 1958 1962 1972 1976 1977 1980 1980 1956 1961 1964 1983 1977 1977 1977 1997 1962 1950 1965 1979 1993 1995 1974 1974 1974 1976 1949 1951 1951 1972 1965 1977 1982 1991 1972 1948 1960 1952 1948 384,862 42,726 26,292 22,956 2,155 2,895 52,040 99,000 47,500 14,093 1,455,023 17,303 49,300 38,000 20,940 26,265 81,500 33,347 13,438 2,320 19,513 50,000 24,605 27,001 37,359 143,000 194,000 22,082 11,916 41,622 173,000 21,083 59,812 52,600 204,989 24,000 42,325 14,885 40,525 912,000 482,000 15,700 11,200 13,450 19,810 31,783 33,300 11,726 11,836 50,000 17,608 59,000 253,995 24,792 37,636 26,790 19,345 24,006 -29-29- Contributed Funds 5 6 7 SEATTLE.. WASHINGTON DISTRICT 13,500 - 2,155 2,895 3,314 119,449 13,467 21,807 9,146 120,518 134,772 6,786 11,726 78,433 -= - TABLE "29-E cost t Qep. ov. 1 Y7 .Stahs REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1998 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Project Nooksack River, Acme, WA2 Nooksack River, Guide Bridge Location, WA2 Nooksack River, Middle Fork, Deming, WA2 Nooksack River, above Highway 12 Bridge, WA2 Okanogan River, WA2 Okanogan River at Outlet of Osoyoos Lake, WA3 Okanogan River, Tonasket Creek and Osoyoos Lake, WA3 Okanogan River, Omak, WA1 Okanogan River, Oroville, WA1 Pilchuck River, WA3 Pilchuck River, WA2 Pilchuck River, WA2 Pilchuck River, Everett, WA2 Pilchuck River, State Highway 92, Granite Falls, WA2 Placer Creek, ID Powell County High School, Deer Lodge, MT2 Puyallup River, WA Pysht River, Sekiu, WA2 Queets River, Jefferson County Sewage Lagoon, WA2 Quillayute River, Quileute Tribal Float and Bridge, WA2 Quinalt River, Grays Harbor, WA2 Quinalt River Road, Jefferson County, WA2 Rock Creek, Granite County, MT2 Rock Creek, Missoula County, MT2 Rock Creek Road, MT2 Rye Creek, MT2 St. Maries, St. Joe River, ID St. Regis River, MT3 St. Regis River at St. Regis, MT3 Sammamish River, WA Sauk River, WA2 Sauk River, Skagit County, WA2 Shelton Creek, WAl Skagit River at Burlington Bend, WA2 Skagit River, Cape Horn Road, WA2 Skagit River, Deadman's Slough, WA2 Skagit River, Pressentin Creek, WA2 Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA2 Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA (Job 66-1)2 Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA (Job 67-1)' Skykomish River, North Fork, Index, WA2 Snohomish River, Lowell-Snohomish River Road, WA2 Snohomish River, Snohomish, WA2 Snoqualnie River, West Snoqualmie, WA2 Soleduck River Bridge, WA2 Soleduck River, near Mora Road Bridge, WA2 Spokane River, Spokane, WA 2 Startup, Skykomish and Wallace Rivers, WAI Stillaguamish River, South Fork, Mountain Loop Highway, near Robe, WA2 Stillwater River, MT2 Stillwater and Whitefish Rivers, MT2 Strong Creek, Hope, ID2 Tahola, WA2 Upper Puyallup River, WA4 Wynoochee Lake, WA Wynoochee River, County Road 141, WA2 Wynoochee River, near Montesano, WA2 Wynoochee River, near Montesano, WA (WR-1-72)2 Yakima, Yakima River, WA Yakima River, Cle Elum, WA2 Yakima River, below mouth of Teanaway River near Cle Elum, WA2 Cost to Sep. 30. 1998 Status Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1985 1950 1986 1960 1974 1949 1953 1981 1982 1948 1985 1971 1980 1971 1986 1964 1937 1977 1981 1972 1981 1961 1974 1973 1980 1973 1942 1942 1951 1967 1974 1989 1979 1949 1966 1980 1980 1963 1966 1967 1981 1969 1970 1977 1961 1963 1989 1970 1964 1973 1977 1970 1979 1938 1994 1976 1969 1972 1948 1949 1947 -29-30- TABLE 29-E (ntiniie Contributed Funds 6,075 Construction 77,300 6,075 79,000 10,807 10,100 52,100 7,987 2,231,030 1,787,630 25,401 81,000 10,713 54,000 30,973 5,865,000 11,291 50,000 86,160 125,000 39,300 208,000 15,928 49,657 31,565 50,000 22,819 357,698 7,234 2,983 2,582,536 20,860 119,600 872,021 50,000 46,489 93,000 137,000 40,753 17,719 50,000 222,500 44,227 60,900 15,565 16,437 11,433 122,138 271,713 50,000 17,457 34,513 8,442 223,893 71,495 23,494,445 111,072 50,000 50,000 381,961 8,047 48,272 1.,VIIuIIIUcu 8 9 10 11 12 13 - 4,943 696,923 32,778 - 24,488 14,307 1,960 79,311 46,182 13,704 21,311 SEATTLE. WASHINGTON DISTRICT Yakima River, West Richland, WA2 Yakima River, Yakima WA2 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as amended. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 2, Public Law 406, 75th Congress, as amended 3. Authorized by Works Progress Administration Project No. OP 65-93-917. 4. Includes $7,850 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 5. Excludes $340,066 Public Works Acceleration Act funds expended. 6. Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L 98- 8). Excludes $189,000 Federal Highway Administration funds expended.. 7. Emergency Relief funds, Works Progress Administration. 8. Excludes amount expended by Works Progress Administration which is not available. 9. Excludes $1,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 10. Emergency Relief funds, Works Progress Administration. 11. Includes $102,200 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). Excludes $17,070,670 for project maintenance and $66,678 for Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters, appropriated and expended. 12. Excludes $17,988 Office of Emergency Planning funds expended. 13. Includes $118,000 expended under Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L. 98-8). TABLE 29-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE PURPOSE POWER PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30. 1998 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Priest Rapids Dam, Columbia River, WA 1954 350,000 1 1. For partnership planning. Excludes funds expended for acquisition of lands under partnership arrangement for Priest Rapids and Wanapum Dams, in accordance with Public Law 544, 83d Congress. Project constructed by Grant County Public Utility District. TABLE 29-G OTHER AUTHORIZED MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sen. 30. 1998 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Status Report For Construction Funds Aquatic Plant Control 1 Completed 1997 6,023,906 La Conner, WA 2 Completed 1996 955,000 3 246,889 Sammamish River Restoration, WA 4 Completed 1995 326,900 64,333 1. Authorized by Section 302, Public Law 89-298. 3. Includes $183,000 for Preconstruction Engineering and 2. Authorized by Public Law 99-662. Design, appropriated and expended. 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 1135, Public Law 662, 99th Congress. -29-31- Completed Completed 1977 1993 36,768 125,500 14 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1998 TABLE 29-H OTHER PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal See Annual Funds Project Status Report For Expended Blair and Sitcum Waterways, Tacoma Harbor, WA Inactive 1989 1,310,000 1. Chehalis River at South Aberdeen and Cosmopolis, WA Under 1993 2,706,000 2 Construction East, West and Duwamish Waterways, Seattle Harbor, WA Deferred 1988 663,000 Grays Harbor, Chehalis and Hoquiam Rivers, WA Under 1989 5,670,000 3 Construction Yakima River at Union Gap, WA Deferred 1988 502,000 1. Includes $300,000 appropriated and expended under Section 3. $3,530,000 of which is included in construction costs. 101(c). 2. $2,212,000 of which is included in construction costs. TABLE 29-I DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Calispell Creek, WA1 1968 1968 25,000 14 Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, ID, MT, and WA Crab and Wilson Creeks, WA2 1958 1964 9,000 14 - Entiat River, WA3 1958 1986 - - Methow River, WA3 1958 1986 - - Okanogan River, WA3 1958 1986 1,100 14 - St. Regis River, MT4 1958 1978 1,400 14 - Wenatchee River, WA4 1958 1978 - - Yakima River at Ellensburg, WA3 1980 1986 44,300 14, 15 - Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA (RH 68) 6 1973 1990 52,000 14 - Flathead River at Kalispell, MT7 1981 1995 300,000 14 - Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA (RH 48) (Unconstructed Portion) 6,8 1962 1990 - - Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA (RH 30) 6,9 1933 1990 35,834 35,834 Hammersley Inlet, WA (RH 30) (Unconstructed Portion)4,10 1950 1978 - - Hoquiam,Aberdeen, and Cosmopolis, Chehalis River, WAS 1948 1952 83,631 14 - Olympia Harbor, WA (RH 45) 6 1973 1990 21,606 14, 16 - Port Angeles Harbor, WA (RH 45)4 1960 1977 - - Port Gamble Harbor, WA) (RH 35)4 1953 1977 - - Quillayute River, WA(RH 30) (Unconstructed Portion)3,11 1986 1986 - - Seattle Harbor, WA (RH 30) (Unconstructed Portion) 3,12 1986 1986 - - Skagit River, WA (RH 10) (Unconstructed Portion) 4,13 1950 1978 - - Skagit River, WA (RH19) 4 1950 1978 - - Skagit River, WA (Avon Pass) 6 1968 1990 54,468 14 Skagit River, WA (Levee and Channel Improvements)7 1982 1995 1,934,792 Spokane River, Spokane, WA3 1939 1986 2,944 14 - Stillaguamish River, WA (RH 45)3 1946 1986 4,234 17 - Wenatchee, Canyons 1 and 2, WA 6 1978 1990 544,331 14 - Willapa River at Raymond, WA7 1982 1995 508,130 14, 18 - 1. Authority for project expired October 27, 1968. 7. Deauthorized under authority of Section 1001 (b (2). P.L. 2. Authority for project expired July 1964. 3. Deauthorized under authority of Section 1002, P.L. 99-662 dated November 17, 1986. 4. Deauthorized under authority of Section 12, P.L. 93-251 dated March 7, 1974. 5. Authority for project expired in October 1952. 6. Deauthorized under authority of Section 1001 (b) (1), P.L 99-662 dated November 17, 1986. 99-662 dated November 17, 1986. 8. 2200 linear feet of revetment at Point Chehalis. 9. 16-foot channel from Cosmopolis to Montesano. 10. Deepening shoal area near Cannery Point from 10 to 13 feet. 11. Groin feature of the project. 12. Settling basin at upper end of existing Duwamish Waterway, about 1.4 miles above 14th Avenue South Bridge. 13. 5500-foot extension of training dike. -29-32- SEATTLE. WASHINGTON DISTRICT 14. Preconstruction planning only. 15. Includes $14,300 expended for restudy, FY 1970. 16. Includes $18,700 expended for restudy, FY 1968-1973. 17. Economic restudy only. 18. Includes $8,888 expended for restudy, FY 1967-1972. TABLE 29-J LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF DOUBLE LOCK AND DAM (SEE SECTION 9) Section Large Lock Small Lock Miles above mouth Clear width of chamber Maximum available length Lift Depth on upper miter sill Depth on intermediate miter sill Depth on lower miter sill Character of foundation Kind of dam Type of construction Year completed Cost Feet Feet Feet Feet Feet Feet 1 22 1y4 80 760 26 33 V2 29 29 Clay Fixed dam with gated spillway Concrete 1916 3 1 L 28 123 26 16 16 Clay Fixed dam with gated spillway Concrete 1916 3 I. Low water in upper pool. 3. Cost of double lock and dam was $2,382,200 and the 2. Mean lower low water in Puget Sound. emergency gates, completed in 1923, $262,300. TABLE 29-K FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 858, 80TH CONGRESS, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs (1998) Lincoln County, MT 14,275 Long Road, F.C. District, Chehalis River, WA 15,460 Milo Creek, Kellogg, ID 2,324 Nooksack River, WA 14,989 Section 205 Coordination 12,026 Snoqualmie River, WA 131,853 2 TOTAL 190,927 1. Terminated. 2. Excludes $57,204 contributed funds expended TABLE 29-L MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 1135, PUBLIC LAW 662, 99TH CONGRESS (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs (1998) Bear Creek Restoration, WA 40,463 Deepwater Slough, WA 120,738 Hanson Anadromous Fish and Wildlife, WA 12,551 Initial Appraisals, General 32,979 Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA 171,310 Puget Creek Estuary Restoration, 8,509 Section 1135 Coordination 7,367 Turning Basin #3 Restoration (Duwamish R), WA 67,664 Wynoochee Anadromous Fish, WA 4,021 TOTAL 465,602 -29-33- WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT * This District consists of all Columbia River Richland, Washington. The primary tributary drainage and tributaries thereto between the head of drainage area is the Snake River which includes more the McNary pool (river mile 345.4) and Umatilla than 107,000 square miles in six states: Washington, Bridge (river mile 290.5) below McNary Lock and Oregon, Idaho, Wyoming, and small portions of Dam, except the Yakima River Basin above the Van Nevada and Utah. Giesen Street Bridge (river mile 8.4) near IMPROVEMENTS 16. Miscellaneous Work Under Flood Control Special Authorization ..................................... 30-11 General Investigations 1. Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Protection Projects ........................................... 30-2 17. Surveys ........................................ ...... 30-12 2. Inspection of Completed 18. Collection and Study of Basic Data....................30-12 Flood Control Projects .................. 30-2 19. Preconstruction, Engineering, 3. Jackson Hole, W Y .................................... ....... 30-2 and Design ....................................................... 30-12 4. Lucky Peak Lake, ID .................................... 30-2 Tables 5. Mill Creek, Bennington Lake, WA.....................30-3 Table 30-A Cost and Financial Statement.................30-13 6. Scheduling Flood Control Table 30-B Authorizing Legislation..........................30-15 Reservoir Operations .................................... 30-4 Table 30-C Other Authorized Navigation Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 7. Columbia River Juvenile Fish a Mitigation Program (Walla Walla Projects), OR, WA, and ID ........... ...................... 30-4 8. Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, ID......................30-5 9. Ice Harbor Lock and Dam, Lake Sacajawea, W A ......................................... 30-6 10. Little Goose Lock and Dam, Lake Bryan, W A ................................................. 30-7 11. Lower Granite Lock and Dam, Lower Granite Lake, WA ................................... 30-8 12. Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, Lake Herbert G. West, WA.................................30-9 13. Lower Snake River Fish and Wildlife Compensation Plan, WA, OR, and ID ...................................... ..... 30-9 14. McNary Lock and Dam, Lake Wallula, OR and WA ....................................... 30-10 15. Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, OR, WA, and ID....................................... 30-11 Projects ..................................... ... 30-19 Table 30-D Not Applicable Table 30-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects......................................30-20 Table 30-F Other Authorized Multiple- Purpose Projects, Including Pow er.....................................................30-2 1 Table 30-G Deauthorized Projects ............................ 30-21 Table 30-H Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Control Projects ........................... 30-22 Table 30-I Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ........................ 30-22 Table 30-J Principal Data Concerning Navigation Lock, Spillway Dam, Powerplant and Impoundment ............... 30-23 Table 30-K Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, OR, WA, and ID .................................... 30-28 30-1 WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT Flood Control 1. COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS Location. Improvements included in this project are along the Columbia River and its tributaries. Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1950 approved a general comprehensive plan for the Columbia River Basin for flood control and other purposes based on plans in H. Doc. 531, 81st Congress, 2nd Session, and authorized $75 million to be appropriated for partial accomplishment of certain projects. From that authorization, an amount (not to exceed $15 million) was allotted for construction of local flood protection works throughout the Columbia River Basin, subject to conditions that all work undertaken pursuant to authorization would be economically justified prior to construction, and local cooperation specified in the Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended, should be required (see Tables 39- B and H, for projects in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Walla Walla District). Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations during the fiscal year. No projects were deauthorized. 2. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Federal law requires local interests to maintain and operate completed local protection projects in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Inspections were made to determine the extent of compliance and to advise local interests, as necessary, of measures required to correct deficiencies (see Table 39-I for inspections made during the fiscal year). Fiscal year costs were $50,437. Total costs to September 30, 1998, were $2,901,792. 3. JACKSON HOLE, WY Location. On the banks of the Snake River, Teton County, west of Jackson, WY. Existing project. On the Snake River, approximately 23.5 miles of Federally constructed levees consisting of the following: (1) On the right bank: a series of levees, off-set levees, and bank protection structures, all with full riprap protection from 10 miles upstream of the Jackson-Wilson Bridge to 3.5 miles below the bridge for a total of 13.5 miles; (2) The left bank: a series of Federally constructed levees and bank protection structures, all with full riprap protection, extending from 10 miles upstream of the Jackson-Wilson Bridge to 5 miles upstream and extending 1.5 miles immediately upstream of the same bridge to 3.5 miles below the bridge for a total of 10 miles. In addition, a series of Federal and non-Federal constructed levees, with a total length of approximately 5 miles, most having some or full riprap protection, are interspersed along both banks of the Snake River from Highway 26 Bridge to 4 miles downstream of the Jackson-Wilson Bridge. On the Gros Ventre River, approximately 2 miles of riprap protected levees on the left bank from 1.5 miles west of Cattlemen's Bridge and extending to 0.5 miles east of the same bridge. On the right bank, a series of levees extending from 0.5 miles west of Cattlemen's Bridge to approximately 0.3 miles east of the same bridge. Project authorized by Public Law (PL) 81-516, Flood Control Act of 1950, for flood control protection by channel improvements consisting of channel rectification, levees, and revetments along the Snake River in the vicinity of Wilson, WY. The PL 104-303 modified the original PL 81-516 to ensure the operation, maintenance, modifications, and additions to the project become Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. Non-Federal sponsors shall pay the initial $35,000 in cash or materials of any such costs expended in any one year, plus inflation as of the date of enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Since 1978, $51,136,000 (adjusted to October 1998 price index) in potential flood damage has been prevented by the levees. Operations during fiscal year. Teton County, under their Local Cooperative Agreement, worked with the Corps performing levee maintenance. Fiscal year costs were $864,762. 4. LUCKY PEAK LAKE, ID 30-2 WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT Location. On the Boise River in southwestern Idaho about 10 miles southeast of the city of Boise, ID. Existing project. The project includes a rolled-earthfill dam about 250 feet above the streambed and 1,700 feet long at the crest, with a lake providing a total storage at upper operating lake level of 306,000 acre-feet. The project provides for flood control, irrigation, and recreation (for details, see page 2,000 of the 1962 Annual Report). Construction of the existing project was initiated in November 1949 and completed in June 1961. Since 1961, $432,210,000 (adjusted to October 1998 price index) in potential flood damages have been prevented by the project. During a detailed study of outlet capacity and potential for adding hydropower to the existing project, a need for an auxiliary outlet became apparent. Construction of an auxiliary outlet was authorized in the Water Resource Development Act of 1976. In fiscal year 1978, an Interim Feasibility Report on Modification of Lucky Peak Dam and Lake (power facilities) was submitted to the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors and approved. States, agencies, and the Chief of Engineers have commented on the report to the Secretary of the Army. The report was forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget in February 1982. A license to construct and operate power facilities at the project was issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Project #2832) to the Boise Project Board of Control on June 10, 1980, and modified on October 9, 1980, and in 1982. Construction of the auxiliary outlet facility began in May 1984 and was completed in August 1986. Construction of modifications to the existing outlet tunnel and powerhouse excavation began in August 1986 and was completed January 1987. Powerhouse general contract construction began in April 1986. The project was completed and dedicated on October 7, 1988. Power on-line for all units was August 18, 1988. Federally authorized 2nd outlet was deauthorized in FY 90. Recreation facilities at Lucky Peak Lake consist of 20 picnic/day-use areas, 4 boat launch ramps, and 3 swimming areas. Fiscal year visitation to Lucky Peak Lake was 791,800. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance, which included the dam structures and recreation areas continued. Fiscal year costs were $907,880. 5. MILL CREEK, BENNINGTON LAKE, WA Location. In and upstream from Walla Walla, WA, on Mill Creek, a tributary of the Walla Walla River. Existing project. The project includes an offstream earthfill storage dam, about 125 feet above the streambed and 3,200 feet long at the crest, two concrete-lined outlet channels, an earthfill diversion dam, and diversion structures. Project provides for flood control and recreation. Authorizing legislation to provide a channel through the city of Walla Walla was added to the project in 1941. Recreation was added to the project purposes through the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was completed in 1942. Paving of the channel through the city of Walla Walla was completed in 1966 (for details, see page 2,005 of the 1962 Annual Report). Since 1942, $45,717,000 (adjusted to October 1998 price index) in potential flood damage has been prevented by the combined storage and channel operation. Rehabilitation of the existing project was initiated in FY 78 and completed in FY 79. The plan of rehabilitation included action to correct the seepage and internal erosion which has occurred during each subsequent filling of the reservoir. A cutoff wall was constructed, but did not alleviate the seepage problem, thus requiring limited flood control use of the project. The seepage and internal erosion create a high vulnerability for dam failure. Mill Creek/Bennington Lake offers visitors three day-use/picnic areas and one boat launch ramp. Visitation to Mill Creek/Bennington Lake for the fiscal year was 172,400. Local cooperation. Fully complied with (for details, see page 2,006 of the 1962 Annual Report). Operations during fiscal year. Operation and Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued, which included regulation of water control structures and care of recreation areas. Completed 30-3 WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT relief wells contract. Fiscal year costs were $862,777. 6. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Functional regulation of non-Corps projects was accomplished under several authorities. Regulation of Palisades, Little Wood, and Anderson Ranch Reservoirs in Idaho, and Bully Creek, Warm Springs, Agency Valley, and Mason Reservoirs in Oregon, was accomplished as authorized under Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, and coordinated with the Bureau of Reclamation. Flood control operations at Jackson Lake, WY, Arrowrock Reservoir, and Lake Lowell, ID were in accordance with formal agreements with the Bureau of Reclamation. Regulation of Owyhee Reservoir, OR, and American Falls, Magic, Mackay, Cascade, and Deadwood Reservoirs, ID, for flood control were accomplished under informal agreements. Brownlee, Oxbow, and Hells Canyon Reservoirs provided flood control regulation in accordance with provisions of the Federal Power Commission license to Idaho Power Company. Fiscal year costs were $313,000. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 7. COLUMBIA RIVER JUVENILE FISH MITIGATION PROGRAM (WALLA WALLA PROJECTS), OR, WA, AND ID Location. At Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite Dams on the Snake River in the State of Washington and McNary Lock and Dam on the Columbia River in the States of Oregon and Washington. Existing project. The eight Corps hydroelectric projects on the Columbia and Snake Rivers have been identified as a major contributing factor in causing mortality to downstream migrating juvenile salmon and steelhead. Without adequate bypass facilities to guide these juvenile fish away from the power turbines at the dams, mortalities incurred through project passage severely impact the commercial, recreational, and Indian fisheries. The Corps has recognized the need to reduce juvenile mortality and has undertaken bypass measures that include mechanized fish bypass systems with barge and truck transportation. Spill as an additional bypass route over the spillways has been used to divert fish from entering turbine units, but it is a significant adverse economic factor due to lost power revenues. Congress passed and the President signed the FY 89 Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act (PL 100-371), which mandated the expenditure of funds for the design, testing, and construction of new or improved fish bypass facilities for the Columbia River Fish Mitigation projects. Completion of bypass and transportation facilities will significantly increase the survival of migrating downstream juvenile fish. The mitigation study will determine the overall scope of the fish mitigation facilities for these Columbia and Snake River dams. The mitigation study project was added to the President's FY 91 budget. The plan of improvement includes the following facilities: (1) Ice Harbor Lock and Dam: screens, new gantry crane, collection by-pass facility, intake gate raise, spillway deflectors, surface bypass, and fish ladder temperature control; (2) Little Goose Lock and Dam: screens, gantry crane modification, collection bypass facility, outfall pipe, fish ladder temperature control, fallout fences, gate raise, deck screen modifications, and surface bypass; (3) Lower Granite Lock and Dam: juvenile fish facility, gantry crane, gate raise, outfall pipe, fish barges, screens, additional moorage facility, fish slot closures, juvenile facility improvements, barge exit modifications, deck screen modifications fish ladder temperature control, surface bypass, and fallout fences; (4) Lower Monumental Lock and Dam: hold/load and collection bypass facility, screens, pit tag facility, barge load facility modifications, barges, gate raise modifications, gantry crane, fish ladder temperature control, and surface bypass; (5) McNary Lock and Dam: gantry crane, screens, hold/load facility, gate raise modifications, tilted weirs fish ladder, maintenance facility, fish ladder exits, hold/load facility, and gantry crane modifications; (6) In response to the 1995 Biological Opinion issued by the National Marine Fisheries Service, the Walla Walla District is conducting a feasibility study (Lower Snake River Juvenile Salmon Migration) to evaluate salmon migration problems on the Lower Snake River. The objective of the study is to improve salmon migration conditions through the four Corps operated dams and reservoirs on the Lower Snake River. The study focuses on how these dams can be changed to improve survival and recovery prospects for Snake River salmon stocks under the Endangered Species Act. The total estimated cost of the study is $20 million. Expenditures to date are $16 million. And (7) The Walla Walla District is currently managing a surface 30-4 WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT bypass and collection technology development effort that focuses on improving juvenile fish passage for endangered and threatened salmon migration past all corps hydroelectric projects on the Lower Snake and Columbia Rivers. It is an aggressive, non-traditional approach to prototype development that involves fast-track design, construction, testing, and evaluation. The fully-funded Federal project cost is estimated at $778,400,000 for Walla Walla projects. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. At Ice Harbor Lock and Dam, work on Phase I of the spillway deflectors was completed, and a contract awarded for Phase II; work continued on the completion contract. The technical analysis continued for the Lower Snake River Juvenile Salmon Migration Feasibility study, in the areas of engineering, economics, and environmental work. The public involvement aspects of the study were significantly expanded to meet the intense regional interest. This involvement included a number of public information meetings, focus meetings, workshops, newsletters, newspaper inserts, development of a web site, traveling displays, and pamphlets. Coordination efforts continued with a number of established regional recovery groups, as did tribal consultation efforts. Work continued in many other areas, which include cultural resources, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Coordination Act Report (CAR), and wildlife and water quality. The 1996 Lower Granite Lock and Dam surface bypass and collection prototype was modified and successfully retested in 1998. The construction cost was approximately $12,000,000 and the cost for associated testing and evaluation was approximately $6,000,000. Plans for follow-up testing in 1999 are proceeding on schedule. Fiscal year costs were $39,581,675. Total project costs are $279,763,824. 8. DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID Location. The dam is on North Fork Clearwater River, 1.9 miles above its junction with Clearwater River, near Orofino, ID, and about 35 miles east of Lewiston, ID. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, and appurtenant facilities. Project provides for flood control, navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and area redevelopment. The reservoir has a normal operating range between the elevations of 1,600 and 1,445 mean sea level (msl). The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 3,468,000 acre-feet (2 million acre-feet of which are effective for both local and regional flood control and for at-site and downstream power generation). In addition, the reservoir, extending 53 miles into rugged and relatively inaccessible timberland, provides important transportation savings in connection with movements of marketable logs. The reservoir is habitat for elk, deer, and other wildlife. The dam structure is about 3,287 feet long and about 717 feet above the streambed. Fish passage is not feasible due to the height of the dam. A hatchery has been built below the dam to assure continuance of anadromous fish runs. The powerhouse has two 90,000 kilowatts (kW) and one 220,000 kW generating units in operation for a capacity of 400,000 kW. Provisions had been made for three additional 220,000 kW generating units for an ultimate installed capacity of 1,060,000 kW and a reconnaissance report justifying the feasibility and cost benefits for the addition of a 200,000 kW fourth generating unit was completed in FY 78. However, environmental and economic studies on additional generating units have been curtailed due to public opposition. Unit 4 is undeveloped. Units 5 and 6 were deauthorized FY 90, Unit 4 was deauthorized in FY 95. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction of the project started in July 1966, was placed in operation in 1972, and was completed in 1986. Since the project became operational in June 1972, it has prevented about $2,836,000 (adjusted to October 1998 price index) in potential flood damages. Power generation through September 1998 was 42.55 billion kW hours. At Dworshak Reservoir recreation facilities consist of 12 day-use/picnic areas, 6 camp areas, 6 boats launches and 2 swim areas. Total visitation to Dworshak Reservoir for the fiscal year was $138,800. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and Maintenance: Management of wildlife habitat browse continued on project lands to provide winter 30-5 WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT browse for elk and deer. Continued work on foundation grouting. Completed work for National Fish Hatchery (NFH) on temperature control and underground storage tank removal and replacement. During the fiscal year, 1.42 billion kW hours of electrical power were generated by the three generating units. Fiscal year costs were $11,076,208. Brood Year 1997 Steelhead Approximately 2.15 million brood year (BY) 1997 steelhead smolts released from Dworshak National Fish Hatchery (DNFH) in April 1998. These fish averaged 197 millimeters (mm) in total length, slightly under the 200 mm target size. Reduced size was due to cold water releases from Dworshak Dam in the summer. Smolt losses due to Hematopoietic Necrosis Virus (IHNV) were low and occurred only in two burrows ponds. A total of 353,000 pounds of steelhead was released in 1998 compared with 398,461 pounds in 1997 and 392,845 pounds in 1996. Brood Year 1998 Steelhead A total of 3,601 adult steelhead returned to DNFH in the fall of 1997 and spring of 1998 compared with 2,980 the previous BY. A total of 2.7 million eyed eggs went into the DNFH production program. The DNFH provided 710,000 eyed eggs for Clearwater Hatchery, and 1.97 million green eggs were air-shipped for rearing at Magic Valley Hatchery. No problems with IHNV were reported; the seventh year since 6,400 gallons per minute (gpm) water supply from Dworshak Reservoir was installed. The steelhead in this brood year also made the transition from inside rearing tanks to outside rearing ponds from water from the North Fork of the Clearwater River. Brood Year 1996 Spring Chinook Salmon The DNFH released 973,400 BY 96 spring chinook salmon weighing 46,645 pounds on March 25 and 26, 1998. This is a large increase compared with the 53,078 BY 95 spring chinook salmon weighing 4,187 pounds that were released in FY 97. The low numbers of BY 95 spring chinook salmon were due to a low number of returning adults and low egg survival (62 percent green-egg to smolt). Brood Year 1997 Spring Chinook Salmon There were 4,807 adult spring chinook that returned to the combined stations (DNFH and Kooskia NFH). These adults produced approximately 2.3 million eyed eggs. At the end of FY 98, there were 1.1 million BY 97 spring chinook fingerlings at DNFH. Brood Year 1998 Spring Chinook Salmon There were 1,323 adult spring chinook that returned to the combined stations (DNFH and Kooskia NFH). After culling for Bacterial Kidney Disease, 1.8 million eyed eggs were held at the two hatcheries for release in the spring of 1999. Brood Year 1996 Coho Salmon In a cooperative agreement with Nez Perce Tribe (NPT), DNFH reared 218,501 BY 96 coho. On March 17 through 20, these coho were shipped from DNFH to Kooskia for final rearing and release. Brood Year 1997 Coho Salmon In a cooperative agreement with NPT, DNFH is rearing approximately 251,129 BY 97 coho salmon. The NPT is developing a Production Plan for the reintroduction of coho into the Clearwater Basin. Brood Year 1997, 1998 Rainbow Trout Approximately 6,882 BY 97 and 4,814 BY 98 rainbow trout are being reared at DNFH for Open House, 1999. Due to concerns about disease (IHNV), the United States Fish and Wildlife Service plans to rear 90,000 5-inch rainbow trout at Hagerman NFH to be stocked into L. Camas Reservoir in May, 20,000 9-inch trout to be stocked into Oxbow Reservoir in October, and 20,000 9-inch trout to be stocked into Hells Canyon Reservoir in May. In exchange, Idaho Department of Fish and Game will rear 30,000 10- to 12-inch trout at Nampa FH to be stocked into Dworshak Reservoir in May. 9. ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM, LAKE SACAJAWEA, WA Location. On the Snake River, 9.7 miles above river mouth at head of Lake Wallula (McNary Reservoir) and 12 miles east of Pasco, WA. 30-6 WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, two fish ladders, and appurtenant facilities. The project provides navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between elevations 440 and 435 msl. Lake Sacajawea extends upstream about 31.9 miles and provides slack water to Lower Monumental Lock and Dam. The dam structure is about 2,822 feet long and about 130 feet above the streambed. The fish passage facilities include two fish ladders. Powerhouse has three 90,000 kW units and three 111,000 kW generating units in operation for a capacity of 603,000 kW. The spillway dam is 590 feet long and overflow crest at elevation 391 msl is surmounted by 10 tainter gates, 50 feet wide and 52.9 feet high, which provide the capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second (cfs). The deck is at elevation 453 msl and provides a service road and track for a gantry crane. The navigation lock is a single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and a 16-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide, 14 feet deep, and 41.6 miles long is provided from the mouth of the Snake River to the dam and from the dam to Lower Monumental Lock and Dam. Principal data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction of the original project started in December 1955, was placed in operation in 1961, and completed in 1971. Construction of the additional generating units was started in 1971 and completed in 1981. Power generation through September 1998 was 78.71 billion kW hours. Recreation areas on Lake Sacajawea include 11 picnic/day-use sites, 4 camping areas, 7 areas with boat launching, and 4 swimming areas. Total visitation on Lake Sacajawea for the fiscal year was 437,600. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Continued repair contracts for navigation lock gate. Completed repair of Unit 5. Operation and Maintenance: During the fiscal year 2.0 billion kW hours of electrical power were generated by the six generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock, consisted of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo and amounted to 4,206,988 tons during calendar year 1997. Fiscal year costs were $7,064,312. 10. LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAM, LAKE BRYAN, WA Location. The dam is 70.3 miles above the mouth of the Snake River and at the head of Lake Herbert G. West (Lower Monumental Reservoir), about 40 miles northerly of Walla Walla, WA, and 50 miles westerly of Lewiston, ID. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladder, and appurtenant facilities. The project provides for navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between elevations 638 and 633 msl. Lake Bryan extends upstream about 37.2 miles and provides slack water to Lower Granite Lock and Dam. The dam structure is 2,655 feet long and about 165 feet above the streambed. Fish passage facilities include one ladder with entrances on both shores with a fish channel through the spillway, which connects to the powerhouse fish collection system and south shore ladder. The powerhouse has six 135,000 kW generating units in operation for a capacity of 810,000 kW. Spillway dam is 512 feet long and the overflow crest at elevation 581 msl is surmounted by eight tainter gates, 50 feet wide and 60 feet high, which provide the capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cfs. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 668 feet, and a 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide, 14 feet deep, and 37.2 miles long is provided from the dam to Lower Granite Lock and Dam. Relocations along the lake included 32 miles of Camas Prairie Railroad, 6.8 miles of county roads, 2.2 miles of state highways, and Central Ferry Bridge. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction of the original project started in 1963, was placed in operation in 1970, and completed in 1976. Construction of additional generating units started in 1974 and was completed in 1984. Power generation through September 1998 was 69.98 billion kW hours. Lake Bryan provides seven day-use sites, five campgrounds, five boat launching areas, and two swimming areas. Total fiscal year visitation was 222,700 for Lake Bryan. Location cooperation. None required. 30-7 WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. Operation and Maintenance: During the fiscal year, 2.8 billion kW hours of electrical power were generated by the six generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock consisted of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo and amounted to 3,178,289 tons during calendar year 1997. Fiscal year costs were $4,190,318. 11. LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, LOWER GRANITE LACK, WA Location. At river mile 107.5 on the Snake River at the head of Lake Bryan (Little Goose Reservoir) and about 33 miles downstream from Lewiston, ID. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladder, appurtenant facilities, and required about 8 miles of slack water levees along the Snake and Clearwater Rivers at Lewiston, ID. The project provides for slack water navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between elevations 738 and 733 msl in Lewiston, ID, and Clarkston, WA. Lower Granite fIool extends upstream about 38 miles and provides slack water to the confluence of the Snake and Clearwater Rivers. The dam structure is about 3,200 feet long and about 146 feet above the streambed. Fish passage facilities include one ladder with entrances on both shores with a fish channel through the spillway that connects to the powerhouse fish collection system and south shore ladder. The powerhouse has six 135,000 kW generating units in operation for a capacity of 810,000 kW. The spillway dam is 512 feet long and the overflow crest at elevation 681 msl is surmounted by eight tainter gates, 50 feet wide and 60 feet high, which provide the capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cfs. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 674 feet and 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide, 14 feet deep, and 39.3 miles long is provided from the dam to the confluence of the Snake and Clearwater Rivers. Principal data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction of the original project started in July 1965, was placed in operation in 1975, and completed in 1984. Construction of additional generating units was started in 1974 and completed in 1979. Power generation through September 1998 was 61.29 billion kW hours. Approximately $16,746,000 (adjusted to October 1998 price index) in potential flood damage has been prevented since the levees became functional. Lower Granite Lake offers visitors 16 dayuse/ picnic sites, 6 sites with camping, 12 boat launch ramps, and 4 swimming areas. Total recreation visitation to Lower Granite Lake for the fiscal year was 1,144,800. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract initiated and completed for dredging the confluence area and the entrance to the navigation lock. Operation and Maintenance: During the fiscal year, 2.9 billion kW hours of electrical power were generated by the six generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock consisted of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo and amounted to 5,227,713 tons during calendar year 1997. Fiscal year costs were $9,219,308. Juvenile Fish Transportation Program. As the first collector dam on the Snake River, Lower Granite Lock and Dam is a primary component of the Juvenile Fish Transportation Program. Transport began in the late 1960's as a research program on how to bypass juvenile salmon and steelhead around dams and reservoirs of the Corps' Snake and Columbia River dams. Transport became an operational program in 1981 with collection and transport from Lower Granite, Little Goose, and McNary Locks and Dams. Transport was expanded in 1993 to include Lower Monumental Lock and Dam. Development and improvement of collection and bypass systems continues with a new collection system completed at McNary Lock and Dam in 1994, a new bypass system completed at Ice Harbor Lock and Dam in 1996, and extended-length submersible bar screens installed at Lower Granite, Little Goose, and McNary Locks and Dams in 1996 and 1997. The 1998 juvenile fish transport season was marked by near average flows after two very high flow years. Juvenile fish collection at Lower Granite was 6,977,250 compared with 4,700,325 in 1997 and 5,227,672 in 1996. Collection in 1998 was up even with voluntary spill for juvenile fish passage and the operation of the prototype surface bypass collector. A total of 236,414 fish were bypassed back to the 30-8 WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT river in 1998 and 6,729,743 were transported. At Little Goose Lock and Dam, 2,527,245 juvenile salmon and steelhead were collected compared to 2,184,859 in 1997. A total of 64 fish were bypassed back to the river compared to 1,567,009 in 1997. The lower number of fish bypassed in 1998 was due to National Marine Fisheries Services' requirements to transport all fish collected at Little Goose and Lower Monumental Locks and Dams with fish remaining in river to migrate being passed via spill. A total of 2,508,221 juvenile fish were transported from Little Goose Lock and Dam in 1998. At Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, 1,487,417 juvenile salmon and steelhead were collected compared to 1,929,045 in 1997. A total of 19,798 fish were bypassed from Lower Monumental Lock and Dam in 1998 compared to 1,196,882 in 1997. At McNary Lock and Dam, all fish collected were bypassed until the beginning of June in keeping with fishery agency requirements. A total of 8,031,328 juvenile salmon and steelhead were collected in 1998 compared to 6,721,969 in 1997. Approximately 2,343,169 of the fish collected were bypassed back to the river to meet fishery agency requirements. A grand total of 21,316,125 juvenile salmon and steelhead were collected in 1998 compared to 15,536,197 in 1997. A total of 18,756,709 fish were transported in 1998, 88 percent of those collected. Of the fish transported, 18,120,746 were transported by barge (97 percent) and 635,963 were trucked (3 percent). 12. LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAM, LAKE HERBERT G. WEST, WA Location. On the Snake River at the head of Lake Sacajawea (Ice Harbor Reservoir), about 45 miles northeast of Pasco, WA, and 41.6 miles above river mouth. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, two fish ladders, and appurtenant facilities. The project provides for navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between elevations 540 and 537 msl. Lake Herbert G. West extends upstream about 28.7 miles and provides slack water to Little Goose Lock and Dam. The dam structure is about 3,791 feet long and about 135 feet above the streambed. The fish passage facilities include two fish ladders, one at each end of the dam. The powerhouse has six 135,000 kW generating units in operation for a capacity of 810,000 kW. The spillway dam is 572 feet long and the overflow crest at elevation 483 msl is surmounted by eight tainter gates, 50 feet wide and 60 feet high, which provide capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cfs. Deck is at elevation 553 msl and provides a service road and track for a gantry crane. The navigation lock is a single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 666 feet and a 15-foot minimum depth of the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide, 14 feet deep, and 28.1 miles long is provided from the dam to Little Goose Lock and Dam. Relocations along the lake included railroads and highways. Principal data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction of the original project started in June 1961, placed in operation in 1969 and completed in 1976. Construction of the additional generating units started in 1975 and was completed in 1981. Power generation through September 1998 was 83.60 billion kW hours. Lake West offers seven day-use areas, five areas offering camping, five boat launch areas, and one designated swimming beach. Total visitation on Lake West for the fiscal year was 157,700. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and Maintenance: During the fiscal year 3.0 billion kW hours of electrical power were generated by the six generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock consisted of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo and amounted to 3,675,044 tons during calendar year 1997. Fiscal year costs were $5,039,295. 13. LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE COMPENSATION PLAN, WA, OR, AND ID Location. At various locations within the Columbia and Snake River drainages in the States of ID, OR, and WA. Existing project. The project consists of a series of fish hatcheries, wildlife development areas, and purchase of off-site project lands for fishing, and hunting access. The project will compensate for loss of wildlife habitat and anadromous and resident fishery inundated as a result of construction of four multiple purposes dams and reservoirs on the Lower 30-9 WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT Snake River (Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite Locks and Dams). The real estate design memorandum and feature design memorandums on all hatcheries and satellites, the off-project wildlife lands, and the site selection report have all been approved. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on November 2, 1977. The DNFH Expansion: Irrigon, Hagerman, Lyons Ferry, Lookingglass, McCall, Sawtooth, Magic Valley, Tucannon, Wallowa, and Clearwater hatcheries (including their respective satellite facilities) are all in operation. Transfer actions have been completed except for Irrigon, Clearwater, and Captain John Rapids acclimation facility. Transfer for these remaining facilities is scheduled to be complete by the end of FY 99. Fencing is nearly complete at all wildlife development areas. Offproject land acquisition is 100 percent complete. Habitat development continues at many of these sites. Development of fall chinook acclimation facilities and Lookingglass Hatchery water treatment in accordance with Senate Conference Report (103-672, page 7) has progressed. The compensation plan is scheduled for completion in FY 02. Estimated Federal cost for the project is $232,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Wildlife habitat development continued at the Windmill, Revere, Shumaker, Pintler Creek, Hartsock, Fisher Gulch, and Campbell off-project land sites. Development of on-project sites occurred at Wallula, John Henley, and Kelly Bar. Fisherman access land development occurred at Donald Road, McDonald Complex, Ferry Road, Swegle Complex, Sulphur Creek, Whitstran, Naches Road, and Benton City. Construction of Captain John Rapids was completed this FY. Different alternatives for water treatment at Lookingglass Hatchery have been coordinated with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Oregon Fish and Wildlife, and Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation. An amendment to the design memorandum will be completed based on the recommended alternative. 14. McNARY LOCK AND DAM, LAKE WALLULA, OR AND WA Location. On the Columbia River, 292 miles above mouth, near Umatilla, OR, and 3 miles above the mouth of the Umatilla River. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, two fish ladders, appurtenant facilities, and a system of levees and pumping plants. The project provides for slack water navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between elevations 340 and 335 msl. Lake Wallula extends upstream about 64 miles and provides slack water to Ice Harbor Lock and Dam. The dam structure is 7,365 feet long and about 183 feet above the streambed. Fish passage facilities include two fish ladders. The powerhouse has fourteen 70,000 kW generating units in operation for a capacity of 980,000 kW. The spillway dam is 1,310 feet long and the overflow crest is at elevation 291 msl and is surmounted by 22 vertical lift gates, 50 feet wide and 51 feet high, which provide the capacity to pass a design flood of 2.2 million cfs. The navigation lock is a single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 683 feet and a 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel (250 feet wide, 14 feet deep, and 32 miles long) is provided from the dam to the mouth of the Snake River. Relocations along the lake included railroad bridges over the Columbia and Snake Rivers in order to eliminate hazards to navigation. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction started May 1947, was placed in operation in 1953, and was completed in 1982. Power generation through September 1998 was 266.59 billion kW hours. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance: Completed dredging of entrance to Ice Harbor navigation lock. During the fiscal year 6.7 billion kW hours of electrical power were generated by the 14 generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock consisted of grains, petroleum projects, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo and amounted to 8,294,395 tons during calendar year 1997. Fiscal year costs were $11,696,358. Recreation areas on Lake Wallula include 19 sites offering day-use or picnicking, 5 campgrounds, 14 boat launching ramps, and 9 swimming areas. The Pacific Salmon Visitor Information Center at McNary Lock and Dam, staffed by park rangers, 30-10 WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT provides a regional overview of Corps efforts in salmon recovery issues. Total visitation on Lake Wallula for the fiscal year was 4,047,100. 15. SNAKE RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM JOHNSON BAR LANDING, OR, WA, AND ID Location. On the Snake River, downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, river mile 230. The Snake River, which is the largest tributary of the Columbia River, rises in Yellowstone National Park in western WY, flows generally westerly for about 1,000 miles, and empties into the Columbia River, near Pasco, WA, 324 miles from the Pacific Ocean. Existing project. The River and Harbor Act of 1945 authorized construction of dams, as necessary, for power, incidental irrigation, and open channel improvements for purposes of providing slack water navigation and irrigation between the mouth of the Snake River and Lewiston, ID. That authorization modified previous authorizations only for the portion of improvement below Lewiston, ID. Acts of June 13, 1902, and August 30, 1935, as they pertain to open river improvement from Lewiston, ID, to Johnson Bar Landing, remain part of the existing project. Improvements included in existing projects are Ice Harbor Lock and Dam, Lake Sacajawea; Little Goose Lock and Dam, Lake Bryan; Lower Granite Lock and Dam; Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, Lake Herbert G. West; and open-river improvement, Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing. Each of the four locks and dams is described in an individual report, and cost and financial data for the entire project are shown on Table 39-A and 39-K. Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite Locks and Dams are in full operation (see individual reports for details). For further details, see the following Annual Reports: page 2,246 for 1903; page 1,986 for 1906; page 1,991 for 1915; and page 1,981 for 1962. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. On the Snake River from the mouth to Johnson Bar Landing, there are 18 privately-owned barge terminals in use for shipping grain, petroleum products, fertilizers, wood products, cement, and other general cargo. There are also 5 marinas and 28 small-boat launching ramps, all open to the public. The facilities serve slack water navigation to river mile 140, the site of Lewiston, ID. That slack water reaches the Lewiston, ID, and Clarkston, WA, area since the lake behind Lower Granite Dam Lock and Dam was filled in February 1975. Operations during fiscal year. See individual report for Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite Locks and Dams. On Snake River from Lewiston, ID, to Johnson Bar Landing, reconnaissance and condition surveys were conducted and survey markers were maintained. No costs were incurred this fiscal year. 16. MISCELLANEOUS WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, PL 858, 80th Congress, as amended: Fiscal year costs were $88,286 with four continuing flood control activities: (1) Section 205 coordination ($11,772); (2) Jarbidge River, NV ($591); (3) Palouse River, WA ($-1,244); and (4) South Fork, Palouse River, WA ($28,075). Two new flood control activities: Goose Creek, Oakley, ID ($33,384) and Negro Creek, Sprague, WA ($15,708). Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (PL 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation): There were no Federal costs this fiscal year. Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14, Flood Control Act of 1946, PL 526, 79th Congress): Fiscal year costs were $65,188 for continuation of two feasibility studies: (1) Section 14 Coordination ($8,701) and (2) South Fork, Palouse River, Pullman, WA ($2,942). Three new feasibility studies: Big Wood River, Deer Creek, Bridge, ID ($24,327); Little Wood River, Gooding School, ID ($24,963); and Payette River, Payette, ID ($4,256). Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (Section 208, Flood Control Act of 1954, PL 780, 83rd Congress): Fiscal year costs were $95,827 with one project at Snake River, Blackfoot, ID. In addition, $29,224 contributed funds were expended on this project. 30-11 WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT Project modification for the Improvement of the Environment pursuant to Section 1135(b), PL 99-362, as amended: Fiscal year costs were $175,095 for continuation of five studies and initial appraisal and coordination funds including: (1) Initial Appraisals, General ($16,890); (2) Coordination Account ($5,763); (3) Soldier Creek, ID ($6,399); (4) Walla Walla River, OR and WA ($56,165); and (5) Grande Rhonde River, OR ($89,878). General Investigations 17. SURVEYS Jackson Hole River and Wetland Restoration and Flood Control, ID. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the Corps to operate and maintain a system of Federal and non- Federal levees along the Snake River in the vicinity of Jackson Hole, WY. A draft reconnaissance study of the potential for improving the system with levee raises, extensions, or relocations was completed in FY 90. The final reconnaissance study was combined with the Jackson Hole Restoration study. The Jackson Hole River and Wetland Restoration and Flood Control Reconnaissance Study was initiated to restore fish and wildlife habitat in the 500-year floodplain of the leveed reach of the Snake and Gros Ventre Rivers at Jackson, WY. The study evaluated losses resulting from levee construction over the past 30 years and determined restoration measures for these losses. The report was approved in FY 94. A 4-year feasibility study was initiated in FY 96. The feasibility study is in its final year. The report will identify preferred alternative restoration actions for four reaches of the Snake River. Lower Boise River and Tributaries, ID. A reconnaissance study was initiated for the Lower Boise River and Tributaries in June 1994. An interim reconnaissance report was completed in May 1995. Although the report included economically feasible alternatives for flood control and environmental restoration, the Sponsor (Idaho Department of Water Resources) opted to pursue non-Federal actions. Until an appropriate sponsor is identified, the study has been reclassified to "inactive" status, as of September 6, 1995. Walla Walla River Watershed Study, OR, and WA. A reconnaissance study was initiated on August 29, 1996. The study objectives are riparian and wetland restoration, fish and wildlife restoration and enhancement, flood damage reduction, water quality improvements, water supply, erosion control, low flow augmentation, and recreation. Total cost of surveys was $422,838 for FY 98, including Special Studies (Jackson Hole Restoration, and Walla Walla River Watershed, $252,945); Miscellaneous Activities, (Special Investigations, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Licensing Activities, North American Waterfowl Management Plan, Interagency Water Resource Development, $116,230); Coordination with other Federal Agencies ($9,201); and Planning Assistance to States ($44,462). In addition, $111,841 contributed funds were expanded for Jackson Hole Restoration. Floodplain management service ($117,104). 18. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the fiscal year, flood hazard data for a number of locations in the District were collected and analyzed. Flood information was provided to several Federal agencies; to the States of ID, OR, and WA; to various cities and counties in those states and to some private organizations. Total cost of collection and study of basic data during fiscal year was $117,104, which included: Flood Plain Management Services ($19,044), Technical Services ($37,187), Quick Responses ($4,250), and Special Studies ($56,623). 19. PRECONSTRUCTION, ENGINEERING, AND DESIGN No preconstruction, engineering, and design studies were conducted during the fiscal year. 30-12 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 98 TABLE 30-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total to Section Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep 30, 1998 In Text 3. Jackson Hole, WY (Contributed funds) 4. Lucky Peak Lake, ID 5. Mill Creek, WA 7. Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program, OR, WA, and ID 8. Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, ID 9. Ice Harbor Lock and Dam, WA 10. Little Goose Lock and Dam, WA 11. Lower Granite Lock and Dam, WA 12. Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, WA 13. Lower Snake Fish and Wildlife Compensation, ID, OR, and WA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost $26,600 19,204 462,000 585,860 44,598 44,168 969,000 987,954 634,000 611,523 $-5,800 1,620 741,000 732,877 29,200 15,925 998,000 974,531 1,047,000 851,718 47,822 806,417 846,762 907,000 1,140,500 805,150 818,871 - $2,525,070 - 2,525,069 671,761 5,695,261' 864,762 6,375,542' 48,182 329,892 48,182 364,003 - 19,652,0812 - 19,648,9812 943,300 22,432,5813 907,880 22,384,8263 - 2,258,4954 - 2,258,4954 852,890 15,513,330 1,281,659 15,485,982 - - - - 17,714,102 - - - - 17,714,102 35,289,000 52,490,000 42,149,000 37,281,000 280,617,00019 43,396,226 53,665,872 39,338,812 39,581,675 279,763,82419 - - - - 327,482,1965 - - - - 327,482,197s 8,309,000 8,509,425 9,369,000 13,877,500 9,108,391 11,009,351 8,036,175 140,977,7056 11,076,208 140,745,5876 - 168,028,7577 - 168,029,756' 10,691,000 13,255,000 7,844,600 11,061,492 12,918,690 8,233,742 5,601,000 7,188,670 7,674,000 8,332,600 4,062,000 7,697,929 6,450,000 8,565,913 30-13 7,045,100 142 ,990,105 7,064,312 142,856,0608 - - - 233,361,0219 - - - 233,361,0109 4,740,000 4,275,800 4,232,800 99,086,15810 4,534,634 4,468,078 4,190,318 98,895,61410 - - - 374,836,315" - - - 374,836,315" 8,723,000 8,960,400 9,365,300 137,498,16812 8,602,507 8,990,729 9,219,308 137,141,22612 - - - 20,000 - - - 20,000 - - - 238,612,732"3 - - - 237,222,73313 6,956,000 6,546,960 5,917,000 6,524,909 4,791,900 5,165,048 4,238,000 4,162,680 5,048,600 5,039,295 2,907,000 2,653,234 101,035,509" 100,957,25114 227,425,241 226,715,834 WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT TABLE 30-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep 30, 1998 (Contributed Funds) 14. McNary Lock and Dam, Lake Wallula, OR, and WA (Contributed Funds) 15. Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, OR, WA, and ID New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost From the county, $39,000 of the cost-sharing funds were received in FY 90, but were not expended until FY 91. 2 Includes $570,831 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. 3 Includes $66,700 allotted and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 4 Excludes $80,000 contributed funds, but includes $96,340 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Includes $2,046,100 regular project construction funds appropriated for and expended by Department of Interior in FYs 69 through 72 for hatchery operations. Includes $655,000 appropriated and expended for additional unit. 6 Includes $20,137,847 regular project operation and maintenance funds expended by Department of Interior starting FY 72 for hatchery operations. FYs 72 through 78, funds of $6,097,000 were charged to project as a cost, but not as an expenditure for accounting purposes. Includes $48,182 appropriated and expended under Special Recreation Use Fees. After FY 92, special recreation use fees included with O&M. Includes $1,310,750 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 7 Excludes $82,500 contributed for artificial spawning channel. Includes $36,748,021 appropriated and expended for additional Units 4 through 6. Includes $914,256 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Includes $789,000 appropriated and $788,999 expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. $ Includes $48,919 appropriated and expended under Special Recreation Use Fees. After FY 92, special recreation fees included with O&M. Includes $641,063 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. Excludes $178,000 appropriated and expended - Bonneville Power Administration funds. 9 Includes $60,941,807 appropriated and expended for additional Units 4 through 6. Includes $12,006,000 appropriated and $12,006,000 expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. 10 Includes $621,063 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. Excludes $31,000 appropriated and expended - Bonneville Power Administration funds. " Includes $46,212,534 appropriated and expended for additional Units 4 through 6. Excludes $405,819 contributed funds on lock and dam project. Includes $63,800 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Includes $10,645,966 - - - - 223,965 - - - - 223,965 - - - - 326,293,7051s - - - - 360,103,408's 11,903,000 12,353,935 11,958,900 12,627,724 256,256,62816 12,009,399 12,398,730 11,990,155 11,696,358 255,077,39316 - - - - 43,707 - - - - 43,707 19,676,000 18,645,000 11,266,000 20,270,019 17,672,647 12,057,266 5,932,000 1,120,417,5891' 6,373,000 1,120,371,587' 28,028,000 33,706,066 25,872,702 25,691,800 481,202,44318 34,280,690 32,606,119 26,857,597 25,513,233 480,438,56918 appropriated and $7,056,001 expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. 12 Includes $338,163 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. Excludes $32,000 appropriated and expended - Bonneville Power Administration funds. '3 Includes $51,661,371 appropriated and expended for additional Units 4 through 6. Includes $2,239,000 appropriated and $2,239,000 expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. 14 Includes $372,376 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. Excludes $36,000 appropriated and expended - Bonneville Power Administration funds. 15 Includes $1,976,586 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Includes $3,778,000 appropriated and $3,778,000 expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. 16 Includes $28,851 appropriated and expended under special recreation use fees and $1,035,860 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. After FY 92, Special Recreation Use Fees included with O&M. Excludes $505,500 appropriated and $301,258 expended - Bonneville Power Administration funds. 17 Includes $400,150 for new work on previous projects (Pasco to Lewiston), and $34,613 for new work appropriation used for maintenance prior to 1953. Excludes $167,500 contributed funds for new work consisting of $85,000 for new work on existing projects (Pasco to Riparia), plus $82,500 for new work on existing artificial spawning channel. 18 Includes $186,570 appropriated and expended for maintenance of previous projects (Pasco to Lewiston) and $401,019 appropriated and $390,527 expended open river Pasco to Lewiston and Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing. 19 This does not include the appropriations and cost from the mitigation analysis under the Columbia River Fish Program, which will be allocated at the conclusion of the analysis. 30-14 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 98 TABLE 30-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS 17 May 50 Blackfoot Area, Snake River, Idaho. Levee left bank. Blackfoot River, Idaho. Levees, channel improvement, and rectification works. Boise Valley, Boise River, Idaho. Channel improvement and enlargement, levees, and revetments in Ada County. Canyon County unit was deauthorized April 18, 1967. Ada County Unit was deauthorized in 1986. Camas Creek, Idaho. Channel deepening and rectification of a 20-mile reach of Camas Creek. Deauthorized in 1965. Gooding Area, Little Wood River, Idaho. Channel improvement. Grande Ronde Valley, Oregon. Levees and channel clearing, straightening and realignment; would complement stream regulation by upstream storage projects. Deauthorized in 1986. Heise-Roberts Extension, Snake River, Idaho. Channel clearing and rectification, levees, and bank protection. Henrys Fork Unit deauthorized in 1986. Jackson Hole, Snake River, Wyoming. Flood protection. Kendrick, Potlatch River, Idaho. Revetted levee. Little Wood River, Idaho. Flood protection in immediate area. Deauthorized in 1965. Malheur River, Oregon. Channel rectification, levees, and bank protection at Vale. Willow Creek unit was deauthorized on October 14, 1969. Mud Lake, Idaho, Idaho Falls Area. Flood protection. Deauthorized in 1990. Palouse River, Washington. Flood protection for urban and rural areas at Garfield and near Malden. Deauthorized in 1986. Payette Valley, Idaho. Channel rectification, levees, and bank protection along 38 miles of Payette River below Black Canyon Dam. Payette Valley was deauthorized on October 3, 1978. Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, Idaho. Concrete-lined channel through Pocatello. Inkom-Marsh Creek unit was deauthorized on October 14, 1969. Shelley Area, Snake River, Idaho. Bank protection. South Fork Clearwater River, Idaho. Emergency construction of levees and revetments. Deauthorized in 1986. Teton River, Idaho. Flood protection. Deauthorized in 1986. Tomanovich-Salmon City, Salmon, Idaho. Channel improvement. Weiser River, Weiser Area, Idaho. Intermittent channel realignment and improvement, levees, and bank protection, lower river area. Project deauthorized in 1990. Whitebird Creek, Idaho. Flood protection. Deauthorized in 1986. H. Doc 531, 81st Congress, 2nd Session 30-15 WALLA WALLA, WA DISTRICT TABLE 30-B (Cont.) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section In Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Table 30-G CATHERINE CREEK LAKE, OREGON 27 Oct 95 Flood control and multipurpose dam on Catherine Creek near Union, Oregon. Project deauthorized in 1990 Table 30-E CATHERINE CREEK, OREGON 24 Sep 54 Organic debris removal along Catherine Creek. Table 30-E CLEAR AND BURNT RIVER, OREGON 24 Jul 46 Construction of riprap bank protection at city of Huntington Waste Water Lagoon. Table 30-E COLFAX, PALOUSE RIVER, WASHINGTON 22 Dec 44 Provides for flood control works in vicinity of and through Colfax, Washington, by channel enlargement and modification, levees, floodwalls, revetments, and modification of railroad bridges. 4. LUCKY PEAK LAKE, IDAHO 24 Jul 46 Dam for flood control, irrigation, and recreation. . 22 Oct 76 Second outlet for streamflow maintenance. Deauthorized in 1990 22 Dec 44 Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation as amended Facilities. 5. 28 Jul 38 as amended 18 Aug 41 Table 30-E Table 309-E 7. MILL CREEK LAKE, WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON Off-stream storage project upstream from Walla Walla. Channel improvement through Walla Walla; concrete-lined Channel. 31 Oct 92 Redesignation of reservoir to the Virgil B. Bennington Lake OWYHEE RIVER, OREGON 24 Sep 54 Gravel, brush and small tree removal from 12 miles of as amended Owyhee River. ZINTEL CANYON DAM, WASHINGTON 27 Oct 65 Local protection reservoir to provide flood protection to Portions of the City of Kennewick, Washington COLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION PROGRAM 19 Jul 88 Design, test and construction of fish bypass facilities at Lower Monumental, Ice Harbor, Little Goose, Lower Granite, and McNary Dams. H. Doc. 280, 89th Cong., 1st Session. 27 Oct 65 Sec 208, PL 83-780, Authorized by Chief Engineers. 3 Sep 85 Sec 14, PL 79-526, Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 10 Jul 85 Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 888, 77th Cong., 2nd Session PL 79-526, Chief of Engineers Report, dated 13 May 46. PL 94-587 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 578, 75th Cong., 3rd Session H. Doc. 719, 76th Cong. Sec 377, PL 77-228, Cong. 3rd Session Sec. 118 PL 102-580 102nd Cong. Sec. 208, PL 83-780 Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 11 Feb 85 PL 89-298, Sec. 201 PL 100-371 30-16 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 98 TABLE 39-B (Cont.) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section In Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 22 Oct 76 as amended 17 Nov 86 LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE COMPENSATION PLAN, WASHINGTON, OREGON, AND IDAHO Fish hatcheries and replacement of wildlife habitat. Changes to land acquisition authority. McNARY LOCK AND DAM, LAKE WALLULA, OREGON AND WASHINGTON 2 Mar 45 Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and Irrigation 22 Dec 44 Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation as amended facilities. 17 Nov 86 Construction, operation, and maintenance of a second powerhouse. McNary Second Powerhouse automatically deauthorized on 16 Nov 91 (BRUCES EDDY) DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, IDAHO 3 Jul 58 Preparation of detailed plans. 23 Oct 62 Bruces Eddy Dam and reservoir for flood control, navigation, Power, recreation, and area redevelopment. 15 Aug 63 Redesignation of project as Dworshak Dam and Reservoir 23 Oct 62 Dworshak Added Units 4, 5, and 6, Idaho. Units 5 and 6 Were deauthorized in Fiscal Year 1990. Unit 4 was deauthorized in Fiscal Year 1995. ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM, LAKE SACAJAWEA, WASHINGTON 2 Mar 45 Unit 1 of 4, Lower Snake River Project. Lock and dam for Navigation, power, recreation, and incidental irrigation. 22 Dec 44 Construction, Operation, and maintenance of recreation as amended facilities. LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAM, LAKE BRYAN, WASHINGTON 2 Mar 45 Unit 3 of 4, Lower Snake River Project. Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and incidental irrigation. 31 Dec 70 Designation of reservoir as Lake Bryan. LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, WASHINGTON 2 Mar 45 Unit 4 of 4, Lower Snake River Project. Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and incidental irrigation. LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAM, LAKE HERBERT G. WEST, WASHINGTON 2 Mar 45 Unit 2 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and incidental irrigation. 25 May 78 Designation of reservoir as Lake Herbert G. West PL 94-587 H.R. 6 PL 99-662 H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3rd Session Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H.R. 6, PL 99-662 Sec. 1001, PL 99-362 30-17 S. Doc. 51, 84th Cong., 1st Session H. Doc. 403, 87th, PL 87- 874 Cong., 2nd Session PL 88-96 PL 87-874 H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3rd Session Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3rd Session PL 91-638 H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3rd Session H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3rd Session PL 95-285 14. WALLA WALLA, WA DISTRICT TABLE 39-B (Cont.) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section In Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents LEWISTON-CLARKSTON BRIDGE, IDAHO AND WASHINGTON Four-lane highway bridge and approaches. Increase of authorized amount to $23,200,000. Approach roadway from bridge to Sixteenth Avenue in Clarkston, Washington. Increase of authorized amount to $24,000,000 15. SNAKE RIVER MOUTH TO JOHNSON BAR, OREGON, WASHINGTON, AND IDAHO 13 Jun 02 Open-river navigation Riparia to Pittsburg Landing. 25 Jun 10 Mouth to Riparia. 30 Aug 35 Pittsburg Landing to Johnson Bar 2 Mar 45 Supersedes previous legislation mouth to Lewiston, Idaho only. See Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite Locks and Dams. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Table E 18 Aug 41 Dayton, Touchet River, Washington. Flood protection Milton-Freewater, Walla Walla River, Oregon flood protection. 17 Nov 86 Malheur Lake, Oregon, Flood Damage Table E 22 Dec 44 Heise-Roberts Area, Snake River, Idaho. Channel improvement. Malheur Improvement District, Snake River, Oregon. Flood Protection Table E 11 Jul 56 Esquatzel Coulee, Connell, Washington. Levees and protective work Lower Dry Creek, Lowden, Washington. Channel improvement. Mission and Lapwai Creeks, Idaho Construction of levee. Table E 23 Oct 62 Bear Creek, Kendrick, Idaho. Channel improvement. Lapwai Creek Culdesac, Idaho. Construct left bank levee Lyman Creek near Rexburg, Idaho. Channelization Tucannon River, Camp Wooten, Washington. Levee and channel work. 23 Oct 62 Ririe Lake, Willow Creek, Idaho. Storage for flood control. 3. and 17 May 50 Jackson Hole, Wyoming. Flood control protection by Table E channel improvement consisting of channel rectification, levees, and revetment along Snake River in vicinity of Wilson, 17 Nov 86 Wyoming. Also operation, maintenance, modifications, and additions are Federal responsibility. 17 Nov 86 Little Wood River, Idaho. Flood protection. H. Doc. 127, 56th Cong, 2nd Session H. Doc. 411, 55th Cong, 2nd Session Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 25, 72nd Cong, 1st Session H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 2nd Session H. Doc. 662, 76th Cong., 3rd Session H. Doc. 719, 76th Cong., 3rd Session PL 99-662 H. Doc. 452, 77th Cong., 1st Session PL 87-685 PL 87-874 PL 87-874 PL 81-188 PL 99-662 PL 99-662 30-18 Table F 22 Oct 76 29 Dec 81 30 Jul 83 PL 94-587 PL 97-140 PL 98-63 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 98 TABLE 30-B (Cont.) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section In Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Table G 23 Oct 62 Blackfoot Reservoir, Blackfoot River, Idaho. Modification to PL 87-874 increase spillway capacity. Authorized in Oct 1962 and 27 Oct 65 deauthorized in 1986. PL 89-298 17 Nov 86 Grande Ronde Lake, Oregon. Flood control, irrigation, PL 99-662 and water. 23 Oct 62 Supply, anadromous fish, downstream and resident trout PL 89-298 fishery, recreation, and downstream power. Deauthorized in 1986. Table G 17 Nov 86 Cottonwood Creek Dam, Idaho. Protection to highly- PL 99-662 Developed urban and suburban areas against flash floods. Authorized Oct 1962, PL 89-298. Deauthorized in 1986. Table G 22 Dec 44 Pullman, Palouse River, Washington. Flood protection. H.D. 452, 77th Cong., 1st Authorized Dec 1944. Deauthorized in 1986. Session Table G 7 Nov 66 Stuart Gulch Dam, Idaho. Protection to highly-developed PL 89-789, Section 201 urban and suburban areas against flash floods. Authorized 7 Nov 1966. Deauthorized in 1979. OTHER AUTHORIZED TABLE 30-C NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sep 30, 1998 Report See Operation and Project Status Annual Report Construction Maintenance For: Columbia River and Tributaries above Celilo Falls to Kennewick, Washington 1. Obviated by The Dalles, John Day, and McNary Projects. Completed 1968 $1,851,195 30-19 WALLA WALLA, WA DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED TABLE 30-E FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep 30, 1998 For Last Full Report Operation and Project Status See Annual Report Construction Maintenance For: Asotin Creek, Asotin, ID' Completed 1951 $12,019 Bear Creek, Kendrick, ID' Completed 1970 133,518 Big Wood River, ID' Completed 1985 784,930 Boise River, ID' Completed 1985 236,500 Catherine Creek, OR Completed 1990 28,800 Clear and Burnt River, OR Completed 1990 99,500 Colfax, Palouse River, WA Completed 1990 5,810,240 Connell, WA' Completed 1967 60,000 Cottonwood Creek Community Church, Completed 1984 23,400 Culdesak, ID2 Dayton, Touchet River, WA Completed 1966 380,617 Dry Creek, WA' Completed 1961 384,426 Esquatzel Coulee, Connell, WA' Completed 1967 293,092 Esquatzel Coulee, Mesa, WA' Completed 1969 38,631 Gooding Area, ID' Completed 1954 86,126 Graves Creek, ID' Completed 1953 75,469 Heise-Roberts Area, Snake River, ID Completed 1955 1,586,439 Jackson Hole, Snake River, WY Completed 1978 2,504,245 Lapwai Creek, Culdesac, ID' Completed 1972 176,833 Lava Hot Springs, Portneuf River, ID' Completed 1973 113,296 Little Wood River, ID6 Active 1993 353,534 Lower Dry Creek Lowden, WA' Completed 1972 17,600 Lyman Creek, ID' Completed 1971 230,315 Malheur Lake Project, OR7 Completed 1990 4,729,348 Malheur Improvement District, Snake Completed 1957 138,608 River, OR Milton-Freewater, Walla Walla River, OR3 Completed 1968 2,327,578 Mission and Lapwai Creeks, ID' Completed 1965 54,538 Orofino Creek and Clearwater River, Inactive 1949 23,050 Orofino, ID2 Owyhee River, OR Completed 1990 69,316 Rapid Creek, ID' Completed 1985 19,500 Pataha Creek, Pomeroy, WA2 Completed 1977 110,815 Pataha Creek at Pomeroy, WA 2 Completed 1993 308,511 Payette River, Emmett Sewage Lagoon, ID2 Completed 1967 39,172 Riverside Area, Pasco, WA' Completed 1972 28,839 Ririe Lake, ID Completed 1983 39,677,448 Sewage Lagoon, Vale, OR2 Completed 1985 75,000 Shobe Canyon, Heppner, OR' Completed 1970 5,000 Snake River, Blackfoot, ID' Completed 1980 131,700 Snake River, Heise Bridge Location, ID2 Completed 1952 8,501 Snake River, Stevens, Blackfoot, ID' Completed 1968 32,425 South Fork, Boise River, ID' Completed 1985 44,400 South Fork Clearwater River, Completed 1973 61,055 Kooskia-Sites, ID Tomanovich-Salmon City, ID' Completed 1955 128,635 Touchet River, Waitsburg, WA' Completed 1973 72,140 Tucannon River, Wooten, WA' Completed 1971 74,305 Umatilla River, OR' Completed 1961 161,540 Wallowa River, Weaver Bridge, OR 2 Completed 1960 16,118 Weiser River, ID3 Completed 1985 293,739 30-20 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 98 OTHER AUTHORIZED TABLE 30-E FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (continued) Cost to Sep 30. 1998 For Last Full Report Operation and Project Status See Annual Report Construction Maintenance For: Willow Creek, ID' Completed 1963 976 - Willow Creek Lake, OR Completed 1985 37,231,33 - Yakima River, West Richland, WA"4 Completed 1964 229,89 - Zintel Canyon Dam, WA" Completed 1995 6,801,78 - 1 Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 205, PL 80-858. 2 Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 14, PL 79-526. 3 Exclusive of $6,300 contributed funds. 4 Exclusive of $9,000 contributed funds. S Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 208, PL 83-780. 6 Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to PL 99-662. No funds authorized until Fiscal Year 1990. 7 Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to PL 89-298. Construction began in 1992. OTHER AUTHORIZED TABLE 30-F MULTI-PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER For Last Full Report See Annual Cost to Sep 30, 1998 Project Report For: Operation and Construction Maintenance Lewiston-Clarkston Bridge, ID 1990 23,409,832 - TABLE 30-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Project Report See Annual Federal Funds Contributed Report For: Date Expended Funds Deauthorized Expended Asotin Dam, Snake River, ID and WA Blackfoot Reservoir, ID Boise Valley, ID Ada County Unit Canyon County Unit Camas Creek, ID Catherine Creek Lake, OR Cottonwood Creek Dam, Boise, ID Dworshak Unit 4 Dworshak Units 5 and 6, ID Grande Ronde Lake, OR Grande Ronde Valley, OR Heise-Roberts Extension, ID Henrys Fork Unit Little Wood River, ID Lower Walla Walla River, WA Lucky Peak 2nd Outlet, ID Malheur River, OR Willow Creek Unit McNary Second Powerhouse, OR and WA Mill Creek, WA 1964 1980 1963 1963 1960 1978 1972 1993 1990 1966 1958 1968 1960 1953 1988 1961 1991 1958 1975 1986 1986 1967 1965 1990 1986 1995 1990 1986 1986 1986 1965 1986 1990 1969 1991 1977 267,626 46,084 10,600 9,080 1,552,000 195,686 655,000 169,195 21,334 4,000 13,000 5,671,000 3,537 30-21 WALLA WALLA, WA DISTRICT TABLE 30-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (continued) For Last Full Project Report See Annual Federal Funds Contributed Report For: Date Expended Funds Deauthorized Expended Mud Lake Area, ID 1957 1990 5,994 - Palouse River, WA 1958 1986 2,000 - Payette Valley, ID 1960 1978 23,178 - Portneuf River, Inkom-Marsh Creek, ID 1969 1969 - - Pullman, Palouse River, WA 1964 1986 289,109 - S. Fork Clearwater River, ID 1973 1986 3,899 - Stuart Gulch Dam, Boise, ID 1974 1979 234,100 - Teton River, ID 1955 1986 10,387 - Touchet River, WA 1957 1977 11,198 - Weiser River, Weiser Area, ID 1960 1990 112,757 - Whitebird Creek, ID 1957 1986 1,896 - COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION TABLE 30-H PROJECTS (SEE SECTION 1 OF TEXT) Estimated Federal Cost to Project Status Cost Sep 30, 1998 Blackfoot Area, Snake River, ID Completed - $209,403 Blackfoot River, ID Completed - 391,143 Heise-Roberts Extension, ID Snake River Unit Completed - 3,402,958 Kendrick, Potlatch River, ID Completed - 85,873 Malheur River, OR Vale Unit Completed - 333,581 Mud Lake, ID Inactive 1,187,000 5,996 Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, ID Pocatello Unit Completed - 6,456,032' Shelley Area, Snake River, ID Completed - 32,348 TOTAL 10,917,334 Exclusive of $36,800 contributed funds. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL TABLE 30-I PROJECTS (SEE SECTION 3 OF TEXT) Inspection Project Complete Big Wood River, ID Blackfoot River, ID Boise River, ID Clearwater River, ID Columbia River, WA Little Wood River, ID Lyman Creek, ID Palouse River, WA Payette River, ID Portneuf River, ID Potlatch River, ID Salmon River, ID Snake River, ID Touchet River, WA Tucannon River, WA Walla Walla River, OR Walla Walla River, WA Yakima River, WA August 1997 July 1998 September 1998 September 1998 July 1998 September 1998 July 1998 July 1998 July 1998 July 1998 September 1998 July 1998 July 1998 March 1998 July 1998 July 1998 September 1998 July 1998 30-22 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 98 TABLE 30-J PRINCIPLE DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, ID (see Section 8 of text) SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Space for Additional Rating, Each Total Potential Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Flood Control Storage Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 1,600 Length of Shoreline Ice Harbor Lock and Dam, WA (see Section 9 of Text) Concrete Gravity September 1974 150,500 cfs 1,545 feet Tainter 50 ft by 56.4 ft 2 428 feet 3 2 @ 90,000 kw 1 @ 220,000 kw 400,000 kw 3 3 @ 220,000 kw 1,060,000 kw 717 feet March 1973 1,600 - 1,445 feet 1,605 feet 2,000,000 ac-ft 53.6 miles 17,090 acres 175 miles NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Open to Navigation 86 feet 675 feet 97 feet 100 feet 105 feet 16 feet May 1962 SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number Concrete Gravity January 1962 850,000 cfs 391 feet Tainter 50 ft by 52.9 ft 10 30-23 WALLA WALLA, WA DISTRICT TABLE 30-J (Cont.) Project PRINCIPLE DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT POWERPLANT Length Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line Little Goose Lock and Dam, WA (see Section 10 of text) IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 440 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number 671 feet 6 3 @ 90,000 kw 3 @ 111,000 kw 603,000 kw 226 feet December 1961 440-437 feet 446 feet 31.9 miles 8,375 acres 14 ft by 250 ft 80 miles 86 feet 668 feet 93 feet 98 feet 101 feet 15 feet May 1970 Concrete Gravity January 1970 850,000 cfs 581 feet Tainter 50 ft by 60 ft 8 POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line 30-24 656 feet 243 feet 6 135,000 kw 810,000 kw 226 feet March 1970 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 98 TABLE 30-J (Cont.) Project PRINCIPLE DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Lower Granite Lock and Dam, WA (see Section 11 of text) IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 738 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operation Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 738 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline 638-633 feet 646.5 feet 37.2 miles 10,025 acres 14 ft by 250 ft 92 miles 86 feet 674 feet 95 feet 100 feet 105 feet 15 feet May 1975 Concrete Gravity February 1975 850,000 cfs 681 feet Tainter 50 ft by 60 ft 8 656 feet 243 feet 6 135,000 kw 810,000 kw 228 feet April 1975 738-733 feet 746.5 feet 39.3 miles 8,900 acres 14 ft by 250 ft 91 miles 30-25 _. WALLA WALLA, WA DISTRICT PRI TABLE 304 (Cont.) SPI] Project Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, WA (see Section 12 of text) McNary Lock and Dam, OR and WA (see Section 14 of text) NCIPLE DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, LLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 540 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Open to Navigation 86 feet 666 feet 97 feet 98 feet 103 feet 15 feet April 1969 Concrete Gravity March 1969 850,000 cfs 483 feet Tainter 50 ft by 60 ft 8 656 feet 243 feet 6 135,000 kw 810,000 kw 242 feet May 1969 540-537 feet 548 feet 28.7 miles 6,590 acres 14 ft by 250 ft 78 miles 86 feet 683 feet 67 feet 75 feet 83 feet 15 feet November 1953 30-26 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 98 TABLE 30-J (Cont.) PRINCIPLE DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line Concrete Gravity October 1953 2,200,000 cfs 291 feet Vertical Lift 50 ft by 51 ft 22 1,348 feet 14 70,000 kw 980,000 kw 220 feet November 1953 IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 340 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline 30-27 340-335 feet 356.5 feet 64 miles 38,800 acres 14 ft by 250 ft 242 miles REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 98 SNAKE RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM JOHNSON BAR LANDING OREGON, WASHINGTON, AND IDAHO TABLE 30-K (SEE SECTION 15 OF TEXT) Estimated Cost (Corps New Work Maintenance to of Engineers to September 30, 1998 September 30, 1998 Percent Constr. Project Funds Only) Approp. Cost Approp. Cost Completed Started Ice Harbor Lock & Dam Initial Project $129,578,480 $129,578,4804 $129,578,4804 $142,990,105 $142,856,060 100 FY 56 Code 710 Rec Facilities 914,256 914,256 914,256 0 0 100 FY 57 Power Units 4-6 36,748,021 36,748,021 36,748,021 0 0 100 FY 71 Fish Bypass Program 109,032,0003 34,499,000 34,496,000 0 0 31 FY 91 Totals 276,272,757 201,739,7574 201,736,7574 142,990,105 142,856,060 81 Little Goose Lock & Dam Initial Project 160,413,215 160,413,2155 160,413,215 99,086,158 98,895,614 100 FY 63 Power Units 4-6 60,941,807 60,941,807 60,941,807 0 0 100 FY 74 Fish Bypass Program 123,287,00 3 32,037,000 32,031,000 0 0 25 FY 89 Totals 344,642,022 253,392,022' 253,386,022' 99,086,158 98,895,614 75 Lower Granite Lock & Dam Initial Project 321,503,981 321,503,9816 321,503,9796 137,498,168 137,141,226 100 FY 65 Code 710 Rec Facilities 63,800 63,800 63,800 0 0 100 FY 84 Power Units 4-6 46,212,534 46,212,534 46,212,534 0 0 100 FY 74 Fish Bypass Program 140,905,0003 29,418,000 29,381,000 0 0 20 FY 88 Totals 508,685,315 397,198,3156 397,161,3136 137,498,168 137,141,226 80 Lower Mon Lock & Dam Initial Project 184,712,361 184,712,3617 184,712,3617 101,035,509 100,957,251 100 FY 61 Power Units 4-6 51,661,371 51,661,371 51,661,371 0 0 100 FY 75 Fish Bypass Program 132,376,000 31,279,0009 31,279,0007 0 0 23 FY 90 Totals 368,749,7323 267,652,732 267,652,732 101,035,509 100,957,251 56 Open River Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing 34,613 34,613' 34,613 401,5832 397,498 Open River Pasco to Lewiston 0 0 0 4,350 4,350 Totals Existing Project 1,498,384,439 1,120,017,439 1,119,971,437 481,015,873 480,251,999 74 Previous Projects Pasco to Lewiston 400,150 400,150 400,150 186,570 186,570 Totals Authorized Project 1,498,784,589 1,120,417,589' 1,120,371,5873 481,202,443 480,438,569 I New work appropriations used for maintenance prior to 1953. 2 Includes $2,064 appropriated and $3,180 expended in FY 96 for project condition survey cost. 3 Does not include mitigation analysis. 4 Includes $203,000 appropriated and $201,931 expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. ' Includes $370,000 appropriated and $358,589 expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. 6 Includes $1,628,000 appropriated and $1,626,084 expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. 7 Includes $11,132,000 appropriated and $10,949,493 expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. 8 Includes $13,333,000 appropriated and $13,136,097 expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. 30-28 HONOLULU ENGINEER DISTRICT The civil works responsibilities of the Honolulu District encompasses the State of Hawaii, the Territory of Guam, the Territory of American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. The division is unique in that its area of responsibility is totally comprised of islands dispersed over an ocean environment exceeding 6 million square miles. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Kawaihae Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii...................................... ... 31-2 2. Maalaea Harbor, Maui, Hawaii ................... 31-2 3. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys...... 31-2 4. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ....................... ................. 31-2 Erosion Control 5. Beach Erosion Work Under Special Authorization ....................................... 31-2 Flood Control 6. Kahawainui Stream, Oahu, Hawaii ........... 31-2 7. Kawainui Marsh, Oahu, Hawaii ............... 31-3 8. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ....................................... 31-3 General Investigations 9. Surveys........................................................ 31-3 10. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........... 31-3 General Investigations (Contd.) Page 11. Preconstruction Engineering and Design .... 31-4 Tables Table 31-A Cost and Financial Statem ent..................................... 31-5 Table 31-B Authorizing Legislation .............. 31-6 Table 31-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .................................... 31-7 Table 31-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ............. 31-8 Table 31-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ......................... 31-9 Table 31-F Other Authorized Multiple Purpose Projects, Including Power ........... 31-9 Table 31-G Deauthorized Projects ........... 31-10 Table 31-H Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection Activities Pursuant to Section 14 ................................ 31-11 Table 31-I Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205 ....................... ... 31-12 31-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Navigation 1. KAWAIHAE SMALL BOAT HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII Location. Kawaihae Harbor is located on the west coast of the island of Hawaii, approximately 85 nautical miles northeast of Hilo, County of Hawaii. (See NOAA Chart 19320) Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-2 of the FY89 Annual Report. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation) Local cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed on August 17, 1995. Requirements are described in full on page 36-1 of the FY95 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. There is an 850-foot long breakwater constructed in 1970. Operations during fiscal year. The construction contract was awarded in November 1995 and physically completed in April 1998. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year were $827,905. 2. MAALAEA HARBOR, MAUI, HAWAII Location. Maalaea Bay is situated on the southwest coast of Maui, approximately 7 miles south of Wailuku, the county seat of Maui. (See NOAA Chart 19350) Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-3 of the FY89 Annual Report. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation) Local cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) is delayed due to resolution of environmental concerns as a result of the Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. The PCA is being coordinated with the local sponsor for execution prior to construction. Terminal facilities. There is an existing 1,000-foot long south breakwater, a 870-foot long east breakwater, 300-foot long wharf, 90-foot wide entrance channel, and a single lane launch ramp, all constructed by the State of Hawaii. Operations during fiscal year. Work during the Fiscal Year included continuing coordination with the local sponsor and various agencies on controversial environmental issues and the continuing development of acceptable mitigation features for impacts to environmental resources. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year were $575,013. The plans and specifications phase was approximately 75% complete as of September 30, 1998. 3. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Condition surveys were conducted by contract at Kahului Harbor, Maui; Kalaupapa Harbor, Molokai; Kaunakakai Harbor, Molokai: and Waianae Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, between April and July 1998. Additional surveys were conducted by contract at Honokohau Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii; Kawaihae Deep Draft Harbor, Hawaii; Kawaihae Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii; and Laupahoehoe Harbor, Hawaii in September 1998. Total cost to conduct these surveys was $95,516. 4. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization). Fiscal Year costs were $23,718 for Kahului Small Boat Harbor, Maui; $18,903 for Keehi Lagoon, Oahu; $12,577 for Hilo Light Draft, Hawaii; $17,770 foi Rota East Harbor, CNMI; and $5,245 in coordination costs. Mitigation of shoreline erosion damage caused by Federal navigation projects pursuant to Section 111, Public Law 90-483 (Preauthorization). Fiscal Year costs were $15,388 for Lahilahi Beach, Oahu. Beach Erosion Control 5. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency streambank and shoreline protection activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 79-526 (Preauthorization). See Table 31-H. Beach Erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization). Fiscal Year costs were $28,078 for Commercial Port Road, Guam; $5,110 for Makaha Coast, Oahu; and $688 for Micro Beach, CNMI. Flood Control 6. KAHAWAINUI STREAM, OAHU, HAWAII Location. The Kahawainui Stream watershed is located on the northeastern coast of the island of Oahu. Laie is the principal urban center in the Kahawainui 31-2 HONOLULU DISTRICT watershed. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4110) Existing project. The project consists of 550 linear feet of trapezoidal-shaped concrete channel; 450 linear feet of graded earth channel; 500 linear feet of concrete floodwalls; and 1,500 linear feet of levees. The existing project is authorized under Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Local cooperation. The local sponsor, the City and County of Honolulu, shall: (1) Provide during the period of construction, a cash contribution of 5 percent of total project costs; (2) Provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged or excavated material disposal areas, and perform all relocations determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the project; (3) Provide during the period of construction, an additional cash contribution in the amount necessary to make its total contribution equal to 25 percent of total project costs; (4) Be responsible for all costs in excess of the Government's statutory limitation of $5,000,000; and (5) Participate in and comply with applicable Federal flood plain management and flood insurance programs. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. Work during the Fiscal Year included initiation of project modifications to the existing project due to damages sustained near the floodwall. Construction was physically completed in July 1998. 8. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858. (Preauthorization). See Table 31-I. Project Modifications for Improvements of Environment pursuant to Section 1135, Public Law 99-662, as amended. (Preauthorization) Fiscal Year costs were $3,702 for Kaunakakai Stream, Molokai; $15,100 for Kawainui Marsh, Oahu; $3,406 to conduct initial appraisal reports; and $11,320 for coordination with local agencies. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration pursuant to Section 206, Public Law 104-303. (Preauthorization) Fiscal Year costs included $5,961 to initiate preliminary restoration plans and $4,688 for coordination with local agencies. Emergency flood control activities pursuant to Public Law 84-99. Federal cost during the fiscal year for Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies appropriation was $304,042 of which $222,497 was for disaster preparedness; and $81545 for emergency operations. General Investigations 9. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $543,167 of which $325,697 was for navigation studies; $147,676 was for flood damage prevention studies; $39,786 for miscellaneous activities; and $30,008 for coordination with other agencies. In addition, $1,594 in non-Federal funds for coordination with other agencies; $60,572 for cost-shared flood damage prevention studies; and $82,461 for cost-shared navigation studies. 10. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management services. The Flood Plain Management Services Program is authorized and implemented under Section 206, PL 86-645, 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended. Through technical services and planning guidance, the program provides information on floods and flood related information to improve planning for the careful use of the nation's flood plains, thereby reducing the potential for losses to life and property from floods and wave actions. Non- Federal agencies are assisted with flood hazard evaluation and planning information for flood and coastal hazard areas without charge. As of November 1991, Federal agencies and private entities were also offered these services on a cost recovery basis. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain regulations, National Flood Insurance requirements, and Executive Order 11988 requirements for federal agencies. Such assistance may include flood information and timing, floodwater velocity, extent of flooding, duration of flooding, flood frequency and regulatory floodway limits. Services accomplished during fiscal year. Requests and responses for technical services and planning assistance totaled 2,428, which included services to Federal agencies, state and local government agencies, individuals, realtors, corporations, lending institutions, engineers, architects and other private parties. Costs for providing these services during the fiscal year were $264,147. 31-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Hydrologic Studies. Storm studies cost was $5,000. Total costs for collection and study of basic data during the fiscal year were $269,147. 11. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Kaumalapau Harbor, Lanai, HI - As directed by the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1998, preconstruction engineering and design studies were continued in Fiscal Year 1998. Work during the Fiscal Year consisted of continued coordination with local sponsors and other interested parties; initiation and preparation of environmental documentation and construction plan and specifications. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year were $288,077. Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, HI - The project was authorized by Section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (PL 90-483). A General Reevaluation Report and environmental assessment was completed in June 1998 and submitted to HQUSACE for approval. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year were $183,846. 31-4 HONOLULU DISTRICT TABLE 31-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 Sept. 30, 1998 1. Kawaihae Small New Work: Boat Harbor, Approp. -578,000 -174,000 2,005,000 0 5,771,200 Hawaii, HI Cost 209,677 1,187,958 2,257,921 827,905 5,621,571 (Federal Funds) (Contributed Contrib. 0 200,000 50,000 317,910 567,910 Funds) Cost 0 200,000 32,085 193,984 425,397 2. Maalaea Harbor New Work: Maui, HI Approp. -2,812,000 35,000 359,700 649,000 2,893,700 (Federal Funds) Cost 236,822 262,036 412,454 575,013 2,774,584 7. Kahawainui Stream, New Work: Oahu, HI Approp. 0 0 327,500 259,500 587,000 (Federal Funds) Cost 0 0 13,739 525,564 539,503 (Contributed Contrib. 0 0 0 0 185,000 Funds) Cost 0 0 5,204 153,048 158,252 31-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents KAWAIHAE SMALL BOAT HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII. An 850-foot long, 120-foot wide, and 12-foot deep entrance channel; a 1.2 acre and 12-foot deep existing turning basin; a 640-foot long, 80-foot wide, and 8-foot deep access channel; a 1,225-foot long west protective revetment structure; a 1,050-foot long east protective revetted structure a 400-foot long wave absorber; and a 2.5 acre, 650-foot long revetted offshore island. MAALAEA HARBOR, MAUI, HAWAII A 620-foot long extension of the south breakwater, a new 610-foot length, 150 to 180-foot width, 12 to 15-foot depth entrance channel, a 1.7 acre and 12-foot depth turning basin and a 720-foot length, 80-foot width and an 8-foot deep access channel. Sec 301, PL 89-298 Cong., 1st sess. Sec 101, PL 90-438 Cong., 2nd sess. 31-6 Oct. 27, 1965 Aug. 3, 1968 HONOLULU DISTRICT TABLE 31-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 1998 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance Agana Small Boat Harbor, Guam Completed 1978 $ 937,798 ' $ 52,555 Agat Harbor, Guam Completed 1989 2,000,000 2 Auasi Harbor, American Samoa Completed 1982 1,033,015 3 141,785 Aunuu Harbor, American Samoa Completed 1982 1,783,129 4 1,412,771 Barbers Point Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1990 53,519,193 5 913,647 Haleiwa Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1978 527,047 6 260,210 Hilo Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1991 5,512,440 4,105,472 Honokohau Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1971 781,036 7 63,693 Honolulu Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1985 16,044,095 8 3,429,879 Kahului Beach Road, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1976 751,867 9 Kahului Harbor, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1984 7,203,221 10 7,310,448 Kalaupapa Harbor, Molokai, Hawaii Completed 1968 157,997 9 3,127 Kaulana Bay Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Inactive 1990 171,400 --- Kawaihae Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1981 5,983,501 1 61,800 Keehi Lagoon, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1956 3,348,000 12 41,857 Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Active 1981 193,000 --- Laupahoehoe Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1990 3,623,450 13 Manele Bay Small Boat Harbor, Lanai, Hawaii Completed 1986 372,000 14 495,256 Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1987 2,127,724 15 10,116,779 Nawiliwili Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1976 584,513 16 30,707 Ofu Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa Completed 1976 980,018 17 5,054,930 Pohoiki Bay, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1979 432,523 9 --- Port Allen Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1984 752,645 18 2,794,411 Rota Harbor, CNMI Completed 1985 2,000,000 19 436,200 Saipan Small Boat Harbor, CNMI Deferred 1982 194,000 --- Tau Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa Completed 1985 1,991,569 20 546,600 Waianae Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1979 1,940,011 21 121,849 Welles Harbor, Midway Island Completed 1950 2,448,056 22 2,111 'Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $282,474 for Construction. 2In addition, Contributed Funds of $1,239,364 for Construction. 3Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $86,563 for Construction. 4Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $231,437 for Construction. 5In addition, Contributed Funds of $2,402,909 for Construction. 6Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $410,077 for Construction and $84,388 for Operation and Maintenance. 7In addition, Contributed Funds of $630,568 for Construction. 8In addition, Contributed Funds of $201,282 for Construction. 9Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. loIn addition, Contributed Funds of $30,200 for Construction. "In addition, Contributed Funds of $62,102 for Construction. '2Abandonment authorized by R & H Act of 1965 (HD 98, 89th Congress, 1st Session). 13Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $364,757 for Construction. 14In addition, Contributed Funds of $370,845 for Construction. 15In addition, Contributed Funds of $223,261 for Construction. 16 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in November 1974. In addition, Contributed Funds of $405,471 for Construction. 17Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $61,953 for Construction. '8In addition, Contributed Funds of $200,000 for Construction. 19Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $774,373 for Construction. 20Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $54,034 for Construction. 21In addition, Contributed Funds of $1,791,068 for Construction. 22Completed in 1941 and Maintenance transferred to Department of Navy. 31-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 31-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 1998 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance Afono Area and Aoa Area, American Samoa Completed 1978 $ 254,015 ' $ --- Asquiroga Bay, Guam Completed 1986 227,181 2 Haleiwa Beach, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1967 240,148 3--- Kaaawa Beach, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1976 176,488 4 Kapaa Town, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1977 158,916 5 Kekaha Beach, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1981 999,996 6 --- Kihei Beach, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1972 154,313 7 Kualoa Regional Park, Oahu, Hawaii Terminated 1982 355,472 S --- Lepua Area, American Samoa Completed 1992 1,706,225 9 --- Masefau Bay, American Samoa Completed 1992 500,000 2 Matafao Shoreline, American Samoa Completed 1984 225,000 2 Ofu Airstrip, American Samoa Completed 1987 189,500 --- Pago Pago Airport, American Samoa Completed 1984 174,941 2 Pago Pago to Nuuuli, American Samoa Deferred 1978 394,187 0o Poloa Area, American Samoa Completed 1978 136,040 11 Saipan Beach Road, CNMI Completed 1992 176,000 2 Sand Island, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1981 301,879 12 Sand Island Shore Protection, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1992 1,313,400 13 Vatia Area, American Samoa Completed 1978 154,309 14 Waikiki Beach. Oahu, Hawaii Deferred 1979 729,087 15 183,000 'Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $209,549 in Contributed Funds. 2Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. 31n addition, $160,098 in Contributed Funds. 4Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $97,075 in Contributed Funds. 5Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $56,916 in Contributed Funds. 6Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $1,672,524 in Contributed funds. 7Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $1,672,524 in Contributed Funds. 8Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and terminated in April 1980 as a Circuit Court ruled sand mining to be illegal. In addition, $177,300 in Contributed Funds. 9Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $485,371 in Contributed Funds= 'oAuthorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $312,480 in Contributed Funds. "Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $101,547 in Contributed Funds. 12Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $255,728 in Contributed Funds. 13 Authorized for construction by Public Law 100D71. In addition, $1,226,486 in Contributed Funds. 14 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $132,075 in Contributed Funds 15In addition $82,000 in Advanced Funds and $17,640 in Contributed Funds. 31-8 HONOLULU DISTRICT TABLE 31-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 1998 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance Agana River, Guam Inactive 1989 $ 250,000 $ Alenaio Stream, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1997 11,228,798 7' Asan Village, Guam Completed 1986 1,275,500 --- Hanapepe River, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1967 784,867 '--- Iao Stream, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1985 12,621,108 356,523 Kahawainui Stream, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1990 3,923,821 2 Kahoma Stream, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1990 10,988,750 3 Kaneohe-Kailua Area, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1985 25,552,400 4 Kaunakakai Stream, Molokai, Hawaii Completed 1950 73,478 5 Kawainui Marsh, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1987 4,345,899 8 --- Kawainui Swamp, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1967 1,265,567 --- Kuliouou Stream, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1971 1,000,000 6 Namo River, Guam Completed 1982 2,416,314 5 --- Paauau Stream, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1985 1,978,514 --- Wailoa Stream and Tributaries, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1966 1,044,888 --- ' adodInit ion, $11,953 in Contributed Funds. 5Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. 2Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $464,205 6Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $540,335 in Contributed Funds. in Contributed Funds. 31Ina ddition, $645,992 in Contributed Funds. 7In addition, $785,103 in Contributed Funds. 4Includes Non-Federal reimbursement of recreation 6Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, construction cost of $5,668,300. In addition, $8,175 in $1,234,147 in Contributed Funds. Contributed Funds. TABLE 31-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to September 1997 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance Nanpil River Hydropower, Pohnpei, Completed 1994 $ 8,000,000 $ --- Federated States of Micronesia 31-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 31-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report for: Authority Expended Expended Ala Wai Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1976 November 1986 $ 40,117 $ --- PL 99-662 Hana Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii 1967 November 1977 HD #94-413 Hanalei Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii 1967 November 1981 HD #97-59 Hanapepe Bay, Kauai, Hawaii 1965 November 1986 PL 99-662 Heeia-Kea Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1972 January 1990 1,481 PL 99-662 Kailua Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1967 January 1990 PL 99-662 Kaimu Black Sand Beach, Hawaii, Hawaii 1975 July 1981 86,235 Kapaakea Homestead Flood Control, Molokai, Hawaii Kaunakakai Deep Draft Harbor, Molokai, Hawaii Kaunakakai Small Draft Harbor, Molokai, Hawaii Kewalo Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Lahaina Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii Maunalua Bay Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Nawiliwili Deep Draft Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Rainmaker Hotel, American Samoa Reeds Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii 1979 1966 1976 1977 1972 1967 Director of Civil Works July 1981 Director of Civil Works January 1990 PL 99-662 January 1990 PL 99-662 September 1975 Director of Civil Works January 1990 PL 99-662 January 1990 PL 99-662 January 1990 PL 99-662 November 1991 PL 99-662 January 1990 PL 99-662 221,500 133,188 292,441 98,800 186,937 30,378 31-10 HONOLULU DISTRICT TABLE 31-G (Contd.) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report for: Authority Expended Expended Saipan Harbor, Northern Marianas --- November 1991 PL 99-662 Talofofo Bay Shore Protection, Guam --- August 1981 80,764 Director of Civil Works Waimea Beach, Kauai, Hawaii --- November 1986 PL 99-662 Wake Island Harbor, Wake Island 1950 November 1986 PL 99-662 TABLE 31-H EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 14, PUBLIC LAW 79-526, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Fiscal year Costs Alii Drive, Hawaii, Hawaii Garapan Beach Road, CNMI Kaaawa Highway, Oahu, Hawaii Launiupoko, Maui, Hawaii Power Plant Road, Guam Punaluu Highway, Oahu, Hawaii Coordination Account TOTAL $ 33,262 16,771 44 6,457 254 18 19,423 $76,229 31-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 31-I FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 80-858, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Fiscal year Costs Haleiwa-Wailua Area, Oahu, Hawaii Palai Stream, Hawaii, Hawaii Waianae District, Oahu, Hawaii Wailele Stream, Oahu, Hawaii Coordination Account TOTAL 31-12 $ 60,559 12,294 36,648 20,716 15,699 $145,916 ALASKA DISTRICT * This District consists of the State of Alaska. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Anchorage Harbor, AK ................................. 2. Bethel Small Boat Harbor, AK ............................ 3. Cook Inlet, AK......................... 4. Chignik Harbor, AK............................................ 5. Dillingham Harbor, AK .................................... 6. Douglas Harbor, AK............................................ 7. Homer Harbor, AK ...................... ................. 8. Kake Harbor , AK.............................. ................. 9. Metlakatla Harbor, AK ..................... 10. Ninilchik Harbor, AK ... ................... 11. Nome Harbor, AK .......................................... 12. Sitka Harbor, AK ................................... 13. St. George, AK .............................................. 14. St. Paul Island Harbor, AK.................................. 15. Wrangell Harbor, AK .................................. 32-2 32-2 32-2 32-2 32-3 32-3 32-3 32-4 32-4 32-4 32-4 32-5 32-5 32-6 32-6 Flood Control 16. Bethel Bank Stabilization, AK .............................. 17. Chena River Lakes, AK ........................................ 18. Dillingham Emergency Bank Stabilization ............ 19. Homer Spit Erosion, AK ... ................. 20. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ... ................... 32-6 32-6 32-6 32-7 32-7 21. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Project .................................................. 32-7 General Investigations 22. Surveys ..................... ....................... ...........3.2..-. 7 23. Collection and Study of Basic Data .... ........ 32-7 24. Preconstruction Engineering and Design ................. 32-8 Tables Table 32-A Cost & Financial Statement .................... 32-9 Table 32-B Authorizing Legislation ........................... 32-13 Table 32-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........ 32-16 Table 32-D Not Applicable Table 32-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .................................... 32-17 Table 32-F Not Applicable Table 32-G Deauthorized Projects .............. ............3. 2-17 Table 32-H Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ... .................. 32-18 Table 32-I Project Condition Surveys ........ .............. 32-18 Table 32-J Stream Bank Erosion Work Under Special Authorization.................................... 32-19 Table 32-K Environmental Activities ......... .............. 32-19 32-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1998 Navigation 1. ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK Location. Anchorage is in south-central Alaska on the southeast shore of Knik Arm, north of Turnagain Arm near its junction with Cook Inlet. (See NOAA Charts 16660 and 16664.) Existing project. Provides for dredging along 3,300 foot baseline adjacent to the port of Anchorage dock to a depth of 36 feet below mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 29 feet and the extreme range is 42 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Port of Anchorage facility consists of two POL terminals at the southern end and three general cargo terminals northward. The northernmost terminal, completed during 1976 and 1977, was outside the Federal project limits. Extension of the limits from 2,070 feet northward to 3,000 feet was authorized by Public Law 94-587 and funded in FY 1978. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging was conducted in two phases: Phase I removed 168,000 cubic yards from May through mid-August, and Phase II conducted from October to mid -November increased the cumulative volume to 399,000 cubic yards. A continuing contract is in place, year two of the five year contract was successfully carried out by J.E. McAmis of Chico, California. 2. BETHEL SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AK Location. Bethel is located in southwestern Alaska on the north bank of the Kuskokwim River 65 miles upstream from the river mouth and approximately 400 air miles from Anchorage. (See USGS Quadrangle Map, Bethel D8.) Existing Project. The federal navigation project, at 4 feet below mean lower low water, consists of an entrance channel 31 feet wide by 1270 feet long, a maneuvering and turning channel 94 feet wide by 418 feet long, and a portion of the boat basin 160 feet wide by 519 feet long. The average tide range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 4.0 feet; the extreme tide range is 10.0 feet. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. The protected boat basin is accessed by two concrete ramps and served by 5 removable finger floats. The numerous small craft are often beached around the basin perimeter. Road access and parking are available. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging was conducted throughout the federal project in April with landbased equipment while the water was solidly frozen. Faulkner Walsh Constructors carried out the operation; the entrance channel was widened to 51 feet and the project dredged to at least 2 feet over project depth. Inadequate pre- and postdredge surveys prevented an accurate assessment of the volume of material actually removed. The contractor was paid a lump sum for the work as specified in the contract, but close out is still pending because of the contractor's claim for additional quantity. 3. COOK INLET NAVIGATION, AK Location. Southern flank of Knik Arm Shoal about 6 miles southwest of Anchorage, AK. Existing project. Navigation channel 310-meters (1,017) feet wide, 11.5 meters (38-feet) deep, about 2,000-meters (6,500-feet) long. Limiting natural depths along the navigation range line are about 9.0 meters for a width of 1,000 meters, an additional 60-meters width for advance maintenance is authorized (currently a contract option). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. This project would reduce delays for the container ships that supply cargo for 80 percent of the Alaskan people. Ships have to wait for high tide to safely cross the Knik Arm Shoal and would rarely have to wait once the authorized channel is complete. Operations during fiscal year. The PCA was executed on 9 Jan 98. Construction contract was awarded on 2 Dec 98 for $7,230,000 and is scheduled to be completed in October 2000. 4. CHIGNIK HARBOR, AK Location. The city of Chignik is located on the south side of the Alaska peninsula about 450 miles southwest of Anchorage. Existing project. The city of Chignik is situated on the south shore of Alaska Peninsula in Southwestern Alaska. It is an active and growing island port whose economy is heavily dependent on commercial fishing. The local fleet presently anchors in the ice free, but inadequately protected harbor or ties up at the exposed city dock. At present boats are subject to overcrowding and hazardous mooring conditions between fishing periods. The anchorage is exposed to all storms from the southeast clockwise to the northwest. The violent southeast and northwest storms often damage and sometimes destroy boats by forcing them ashore or on the exposed rock reefs at low tides. 32-2 ALASKA DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The proposed project would provide a protected harbor, which would produce benefits in the form of reduced boat damage, increased fish harvest, and a harbor of refuge. The average annual navigation benefits attributable to the project are currently estimated at $1,695,400. Operations during fiscal year. Construction funds were added by Congress in the FY 98 Appropriation bill. The PCA is being negotiated and a finance plan prepared. 5. DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK Location. Dillingham Harbor is located at the head of Nushagak Bay, an arm of Bristol Bay, on the right bank of Nushagak River, just below its confluence with Wood River; about 470 miles northeast of Dutch Harbor and 300 miles southwest of Anchorage. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16660.) Existing project. A small-boat basin 230,000 square feet in area with a depth of 0.0 feet mean lower low water along Scandinavian Creek with an entrance channel 250 feet long and 40 feet wide in Scandinavian Creek and a rock sill across its outlet. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 19.8 feet. Extreme range is 30 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are four docks at the city of Dillingham; three privately owned, one owned by the city. Four publicly owned small boat floats located in the Harbor basin were installed in June 1982. They are removed before fall freezeup and replaced each spring. Facilities are inadequate for the number of boats using the harbor. Operations during fiscal year. Annual maintenance dredging was carried out by Swalling Construction in May with the removal of 91,593 cubic yards. This was year 2 of a 2 year continuing contract. 6. DOUGLAS HARBOR, AK Location. The City of Douglas is located about 2 miles southeast of Juneau along the Gastineau Channel on Douglas Island in southeast Alaska. (See NOAA charts 17315, 17300, and 16016.) Existing Project. Provides for a 5.2 acre small boat basin with an entrance channel both to a depth of 12 feet below MLLW. A rock jetty 105 feet in length protects the project from wave damage. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The small boat basin has three main floats with power, lighting, and water; a launch ramp is available for public use. The city dock is located at the harbor entrance. Fuel, repair facilities, and lodging are available in Juneau. Operations during fiscal year. The first maintenance dredging since project inception was accomplished by J.E. McAmis in August-September. The entrance channel was widened, straightened, and dredged to 2 feet over project depth; 24,242 cubic yards were removed from the project. 7. HOMER HARBOR, AK Location. In Kachemak Bay, on Kenai Peninsula, 152 miles by water, southwest of Anchorage. The harbor site is near the extremity of Homer Spit, which varies to one-quarter mile in width and extends 4.5 miles southeasterly from the mainland. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16645.) Existing project. Provides for a sheltered small-boat harbor, relocated and based within Homer Spit, about 50 acres in area. Project depth varies from 10 feet mean lower low water in the west end of the harbor to 20 feet below mean lower low water in the entrance channel and the east end. The entrance channel is protected by a main rock breakwater 1,018 feet long and secondary rock breakwater 238 feet long. Tidal range between mean lower low and mean higher high water is 18.1 feet, with an extreme range of 30.4 feet. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1593 of Annual Report for 1964.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The facilities consist of one publicly owned and operated wharf capable of handling oceangoing vessels for passengers and general cargo. Small boat facilities in the basin include publicly owned mooring floats, a publicly owned wharf, and an industrial wharf. Construction has tripled the size of the harbor. The city of Homer has tripled the size of its fish dock located at the southern end of the harbor. Operation during fiscal year. Maintenance: Annual maintenance dredging was conducted by Swalling Construction of Anchorage, Alaska during September. Removed from the project entrance were 6,122 cubic yards of material, and 2,051 cubic yards were dredged from the Coast Guard berth. 32-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1998 8. KAKE HARBOR, AK Location. Kake a community of 700, is located in Southeastern Alaska about 40 miles west of Petersburg and 800 miles northwest of Seattle. Existing project. Commercial fishing and logging are the primary industries in the area. A feasibility report was completed in 1968, and the recommended project was authorized for construction. The authorized project, adjacent to the city, was estimated to cost $13.2 million in 1986 dollars. The project includes construction of two rubblemound breakwaters and dredging of an entrance channel and mooring basin with a design depth of 18 feet. The average annual benefits amount to $785 thousand, all for commercial navigation. The benefit to cost ratio is 1.5, based on the authorized interest rate. Expansion of an existing harbor at the Portage Cove site, located about 3 miles southeast of town, would have a benefit to cost ratio of 1.2 at the current interest rate. The city of Kake is the local sponsor, with financial support from the State. Detailed designs for the authorized harbor adjacent to Kake were completed in 1982, but the high cost of the required breakwaters could not be economically justified at the current interest rate used to evaluate Federal projects. Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed on 26 Nov 1997. Operation during fiscal year. Construction contract was awarded on 29 April 1998 to Kake Tribal Logging & Timber Corporation for $14,554,257. Fiscal year expenditures were $2,735,073. Contract is scheduled to be completed in June 2001. 9. METLAKATLA HARBOR, AK Location. Metlakatla is located in the southern portion of Port Chester, a small bay on the northwest coast of Annette Island in southeastern Alaska, 18 miles south of Ketchikan. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 8074, 8075, and 8102.) Existing project. Consists of two small boat basins. The existing basin is 2.18 acres in extent with a depth of 10 feet below mean lower low water, protected by a rubblemound breakwater 900 feet long. The new basin consists of two rubblemound breakwaters, 1,255 and 1,150 feet long, and an entrance channel and maneuvering area, 1,100 feet long, 100 feet wide, dredged to a depth of 15 feet below mean lower low water and a basin area of 6.25 acres dredged to a depth of 15 feet below mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 14.7 feet, with an extreme range of 24 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Publicly owned facilities consist of one general cargo dock, one barge ramp, and a small boat float system in existing basin. Privately owned facilities are one oil pier and one industrial wharf. Facilities are not adequate for mooring the commercial fishing vessels operating from Metlakatla. The existing protected harbor area is fully utilized. Operations during fiscal year. The project is physically complete; contractor claims are pending. 10. NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK Location. Ninilchik Harbor is located at the mouth of Ninilchik River in Cook Inlet, at the village of Ninilchik. The community of Ninilchik, AK, is about 40 miles upcoast from Homer and 112 miles southwest of Anchorage. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16640.) Existing project. A small-boat basin 400 feet long by 150 feet wide is dredged to an elevation of 2 feet above mean lower low water, with an approach channel 400 feet long and 50 feet wide dredged to an elevation of 9 feet above mean lower low water; protected by two rock jetties. Modifications for, river channel diversion, the 2 armor rock jetties, and beach protection were accomplished in 1967 and 1969. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 19.1 feet, with an extreme range of 29.3 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities, which are limited to shallowdraft vessels and accessible from Cook Inlet only at half-tide or higher, are a cannery dock along Ninilchik River available for offloading fish, and small boat floats in the project basin, provided by the state of Alaska. Other supplies are landed on beach or brought by road from deep draft ports in the vicinity. Facilities are extremely inadequate for the number of boats presently using the harbor. Expansion of facilities would require construction of additional protected harbor area. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging of the harbor and entrance channel was accomplished during May 1996 by Swalling Construction of Anchorage, Alaska. During that time 8,319 cubic yards of material was removed. 11. NOME HARBOR, AK Location. Nome Harbor is located at the mouth of the Snake River at the city of Nome, AK, on the northerly shore of Norton Sound, an arm of the Bering Sea. It is a shallow open roadstead, 581 nautical miles north of Dutch Harbor and 545 air miles northwest of Anchorage. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16206.) 32-4 ALASKA DISTRICT Existing project. The federal navigation project, at 8 feet below mean lower low water, consists of a dogleg entrance channel 75 feet wide by 1550 feet long running form Norton Sound to a turning basin 250 feet wide by 600 feet long, located at the confluence of the Snake River with Dry and Bourbon Creeks. The entrance is flanked to seaward by a 400 foot eastern jetty and a 240 foot western jetty and is further protected through its length by a steel sheet pile revetment on both sides. The eastern waterfront is protected by a 3350 foot long seawall that extends from the eastern jetty. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 1.6 feet and extreme tidal range is 7.5 feet, but water levels are influenced more by wind than tide. Levels of 5 feet below mean lower low water have been observed during offshore winds, and a level of 14 feet above mean lower low water has been observed during a southerly storm. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Cargoes and passengers from ocean vessels are lightered to and from shore, a distance of about 2 miles. Traffic enters the dredged channel and is handled over revetment, where a lighterage company has transfer facilities which are open to the public. Facilities are considered inadequate for existing commerce. In July 1984, the city of Nome received Department of Army authorization (permit) to construct a 3,600-foot gravel filled causeway. Construction of the causeway began in July 1985. Due to lack of complete funding, the length of the causeway was shortened to 2,700 feet. Construction was completed in May 1987. Use of this causeway for off-loading petroleum products was delayed until the September 1987 arrival of a required berthing barge. Operations during fiscal year. A feasibility report was completed that developed a harbor complex that includes a new breakwater that protects the existing causeway docks. Provides for a new entrance to a small boat harbor and a sediment management scheme to keep the harbor open year round. Annual maintenance dredging was carried out in the northsouth portion of the entrance channel in June with the removal of 6,102 cubic yards. The work was accomplished by Dennis Josephson of Vancouver, Washington. 12. SITKA HARBOR, AK Location. The city of Sitka is located in southeastern Alaska, about 95 miles south-southwest of Juneau. It is situated on the western coast of 1,600 square mile Baranof Island. Sitka is about 20 miles from the open Pacific Ocean on the east side of Sitka Sound. Existing project. The recommended plan, also known as the Channel Rock plan, consists of three rubblemound breakwaters constructed across the northern end of the western anchorage, and an inner harbor facility placed adjacent to Thomsen Harbor. This project created a large protected harbor in which moorage basins could be developed using minimal or no wave protection structures. The three breakwaters are 480 feet, 1,200 feet, and 320 feet long. Navigation openings in the breakwater, 325 feet and 190 feet wide at the design depth, are located at natural channels where water depths are 50 to 55 feet at mean lower low water. Two gaps allow for vessel traffic separation, which may be particularly important when log rafts or barges are being towed through the western anchorage. The two breakwaters forming the southern opening overlap to minimize ocean swell in Thomsen Harbor. The breakwaters are placed directly on the submerged rock reefs forming the northern boundary of western Anchorage. Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on 7 December 1993. Operations during fiscal year. The Channel Rock Breakwaters were physically completed in 1995. During construction 192,318 cubic yards of core rock, 65,330 cubic yards of secondary rock, and 52,867 cubic yards of armor stone were placed. Construction was completed in June 1996. A study on the breakwater effect on the herring population was completed in 1998 and showed no ill effects on the fish population. 13. ST. GEORGE, AK Location. The city of St. George is located on St. George Island, the southernmost island of the Pribilof Islands, near the edge of the southwest Bering Sea shelf. Existing project. The project was authorized in the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1993, P.L. 102- 377. The work consists of excavating the St. George Harbor entrance channel to 20 feet below mean lower low water in accordance with cost-sharing provisions in P.L. 99-662. Local cooperation. The portion of the project was done by the Local Sponsor under Section 215, P.L. 90-483 with reimbursement to the Local Sponsor by the Government for its share on completion. Operations during the fiscal year. The Local Sponsor completed the portion of the project under the Section 215 agreement. Work on the remainder of the project is scheduled to be initiated in FY 2000. 32-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1998 14. ST. PAUL ISLAND HARBOR, AK Location. St. Paul Island Harbor is located on the shore of Village Cove, the southern side of St. Paul Island, the largest and most populated island of the Pribilof group in the central southeast Bering Sea. Local cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement was submitted for approval. Operations during the fiscal year. Congress authorized improvements to the breakwater, the entrance channel, and the maneuvering area in WRDA of 1996. Model testing and design work on these improvements continued during 1998. Design was completed for harbor improvements with construction to start in FY 99. 15. WRANGELL HARBOR, AK Location. Wrangell Harbor is located on the northwest side of Wrangell Island, 824 miles from Seattle and 160 miles from Juneau. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 8164, 8161, and 8201.) Existing project. The project consists of a rubblemound breakwater 300 feet long to protect the southern portion of the outer harbor; a mooring basin 600 feet long, 400 feet wide, and 10 feet deep below mean lower low water within the protected area; an inner basin in the tide flat area east of Shakes Island, 325 feet wide and 550 feet long; a connecting channel 120 feet wide and approximately 530 feet long; a connecting channel 120 feet wide and approximately 530 feet long from the outer mooring basin all at a depth of 10 feet at mean lower low water; and construction of a rock mound breakwater 320 feet long on the reef north of Shakes Island. The range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 15.7 feet. The extreme tidal range is 26 feet. Heavy swells, dangerous to small fishing boats, are caused by the wind, which causes an additional rise of about one foot. Construction of the breakwater north of Shakes Island was placed on inactive status as material to be used from the inner basin was unsuitable and the breakwater considered unnecessary for safe moorage of vessels. The cost of this portion was last revised in 1956 and estimated to be $6,500. (See table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are eight wharves and floats in Wrangell Harbor. Two privately owned wharves serving general cargo and passenger terminals, one of which includes a cold storage facility, are open for public use. The remaining wharves serve various industrial purposes. One of the floats is publicly owned and is open for public use for mooring and servicing of small craft, and two privately owned floats serve oil handling facilities. Operations during fiscal year. A feasibility study for a new harbor was initiated in FY 97 and is scheduled to be completed in FY 99. Flood Control 16. BETHEL BANK STABILIZATION, AK Location. Bethel, AK is located in southwestern Alaska on the north bank of the Kuskokwim River 400 miles west of Anchorage. Existing project. The project consists of rock riprap toe protection to be installed on the unprotected river bank and at locations where existing city construction bulkheads are threatened by erosion. This includes 4,000 feet of unprotected riverbank and 4,200 feet of previously installed bulkheads. The construction contract was awarded on 26 May 1995. Emergency erosion protection for the Bethel Cargo Dock and the Mission Road Bulkhead began in July 1995 and continued through FY 1995 due to accelerated erosion that accumulated after spring runoff. Location cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed on 3 March 1994. Terminal facilities. The POL tank farm is situated at the downstream end of the project and the city's general cargo dock is at the upstream end of the project. Operations during fiscal year. The project was physically complete in September 1997, except for seeding the stopped riverbanks. The total project cost was $24,000,000 of which Bethel contributed $6,000,000. Credit for land and rights of way is pending. Contractor claims are pending. 17. CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK Location. Chena River Lakes is located in the vicinity of Fairbanks, AK, and encompassing the Tanana River, Chena River, Little Chena River, and their tributaries. (See USGS map Fairbanks, C1, DI, D2, and Big Delta D6.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Existing project. Moose Creek is located 17 miles east of Fairbanks with control works on the Chena River. The dam itself extends from a bluff one mile north of the Chena River and south past the control works for approximately six miles to the Tanana River. The dam connects with a completed 22 mile levee system along the north boundary of the Tanana river to a 32-6 ALASKA DISTRICT point south and west of Fairbanks. Estimated Federal cost is $210,000,000 for Little Chena Dam, which was submitted for deauthorization in September 1990. Operations during fiscal year. A contract was awarded for replacement of underground storage tanks by December 1998. Engineering and Design was accomplished for maintenance dredging of the lower reaches of the Chena River in early 1999. 18. DILLINGHAM EMERGENCY BANK STABILIZATION, AK Location. Dillingham is located 350 miles southwest of Anchorage, Alaska. The project is located along the southeastern edge of Dillingham adjacent to the Nushagak River. Erosion of the toe of the bluff in this area is endangering critical utilities and numerous buildings and homes. Existing project. The authorized project consists of a 1,600-foot long steel sheetpile bulkhead along the toe of the bluff from the Dillingham City Cargo dock to Snag Point. The sheetpile wall will be constructed to an elevation of 28 feet MLLW. Mitigation measures including emergency access ladders and eyebolts for anchoring setnets used for by subsistence fishermen are included in the project. Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed in January 1998. Terminal Facilities. Dillingham has a general cargo dock adjacent to the authorized project. Operations during fiscal year. The plans and specifications were completed and a construction contract was awarded in September 1998 in the amount of 1,798,850. 19. HOMER SPIT, AK Location. The project is located near the town of Homer, Alaska, 120 miles southwest of Anchorage. Part of the city is located on a 4.5 mile long finger of land that varies in width from 30 to 500 yards wide extending into Kachemak Bay. Existing Project. The authorized project, which was constructed in 1994, consists of 1,400 feet of rock revetment. The revetment was extended an additional 3,700 feet along the road by the Fiscal Year 1996 Appropriation Bill. Local Cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed detailing cost sharing of the project. Operations during fiscal year. The contract for the additional 3700 feet of revetment was completed and closed out in June 1998. Surveys are scheduled to be done annually and the beach replenished in 2004. 20. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities--repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $257,025 for disaster preparedness, and field investigations. 21. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections were made of the following flood control works: Tanana River Levee at Fairbanks, Talkeetna River at Talkeetna; Lowell Creek at Seward; Klutina River at Copper Center; Skagway River at Skagway; Gold Creek at Juneau; and Yukon River at Galena. An inspection was made of the shore protection works at Nome. General Investigation 22. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $1,955,020 of which $1,454,150 was for navigation studies, $42,254 for flood damage prevention studies, $241,231 for special studies, $91,103 for miscellaneous studies, and $126,282 for coordination studies with other agencies. In addition contributed funds in the amount of $564,417 were expended: $183,766 from the local share for Seward Harbor navigation studies, $187,331 for Nome Harbor navigation studies, $26,596 for Wrangell Harbor navigation studies, $29,808 for preconstruction engineering and design works under Sand Point, and $129,177 for coordination studies with other agencies. 23. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Technical assistance, information, flood plain manage-ment guidance, and other flood plain management services have been provided to military and nonmilitary Federal agencies, local communities, state agencies, Architectural Engineering firms, lending institutions, and private individuals at a fiscal year cost of $144,997. Fiscal year costs for Hydrologic Studies were $13,717. 32-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY'OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1998 24. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN SAND POINT, AK Location. Sand Point is a commercial fishing community on the Pacific coast off the southwestern Alaska Peninsula. Sand Point is about 570 air miles southwest of Anchorage and about midway between Kodiak and Dutch Harbor. The harbor provides close access to one of the State's most productive fishing areas. For the past few years the population has been stable at around 1,000. The economy is based almost wholly on commercial fishing. This study is in partial response to the Rivers and harbors in Alaska study resolution, adopted by the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Public Works on 2 December 1970. The study was requested by the Aleutians East Borough to investigate navigation improvements at Sand Point, Alaska. The harbor currently provides no permanent protected moorage for vessels larger than 80 feet. In recent years, the fleet operating in the Bering Sea/Aleutian Island area, made up primarily of vessels ranging from 80 to 160 feet, has grown significantly. Skippers fishing in the Sand Point area currently travel long distances to secure protected moorage. Existing Project. The proposed harbor improvements at Sand Point consist of construction of a 570-foot and a 730-foot breakwater from shore to form the basin and entrance channel of the new harbor. The crest height of the rubblemound breakwaters would be +16 ft MLLW. The breakwaters would be designed to withstand the forces of a 6.6 foot wave. The entrance channel would be dredged to -18 ft MLLW, it would be 120 feet wide to allow one-way traffic of vessels 150 feet in length with a 34-foot beam and 10.5 foot draft. The mooring basin would be dredged to a depth of -17 ft MLLW and would provide room for 37 vessels. Local Cooperation. A Preconstruction Engineering and Design Agreement was signed on 10 July 1998. Operations during fiscal year. The feasibility report was approved by Pacific Ocean Division on 14 May 1998. Plans and specifications were initiated and are scheduled to be completed in May. 32-8 ALASKA DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 30 Sep 98 Anchorage Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) Bethel Small Boat Harbor, AK Cook Inlet Navigation, AK (Contrib. Funds) Chignik Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) Dillingham Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost. 533,235 533,235 1,150,500 1,493,955 1,171,503 1,494,192 986,000 1,849,400 32,958,562 967,277 967,277 32,937,714 638,080 638,080 476,800 468,498 84,000 115,000 159,230 71,969 88,584 33,447 149,022 36,970 84,000 100,199 86,301 46,618 41,959 82,696 19,763 27,808 104,000 4,488,928 162,013 338,426 1,681 14,500 14,772 86 533,235 533,235 496,563 496,306 5,041,928 891,047 344,031 343,974 356,699 298,665 701 8,562 319,000 356,200 338,244 362,066 92,660 91,258 364,500 383,000 10,409,982 357,989 386,332 10,421,346 1,700 1,700 32-9 TABLE 32-A 3. 4. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1998 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 30 Sep 98 Douglas Harbor, AK Homer Harbor, AK Kake Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) Metlakatla Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) Ninilchik Harbor, AK 11. Nome Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 6. 100,000 35,461 46,000 44,456 670,411 44,456 44,456 657,850 160,000 186,000 158,000 164,633 186,663 161,980 -10,556 2,004 100,000 35,461 1,101,855 724,226 3,512,350 3,512,350 149,800 5,797,913 147,221 5,492,720 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost S 294,658 3,381,000 3,675,658 S 250,469 2,735,073 2,985,542 580,000 - 53,856 -2,029 100,000 43,116 68,500 76,666 580,000 53,856 15,000 5,258,941 25,905 5,221,061 148,520 148,520 890,144 724,651 428,720 428,720 160,000 165,400 152,000 160,800 5,316,239 153,598 171,619 150,531 159,906 5,312,751 144,000 237,230 400,000 2,129,470 133,668 195,920 402,428 2,080,256 776,906 522,800 333,000 290,000 11,929,206 795,544 523,399 327,227 292,042 12,006,648 2,500 2,500 276,961 21,419 2,500 21,419 286,961 21,419 32-10 TABLE 32-A (Continued) 67,974 67,974 7. 8. 9. 10. ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 32-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 30 Sep 98 12. Sitka Harbor, AK (Contributed Funds) 13. St. George, AK (Contrib. Funds) 14. St. Paul Island Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 15. Wrangell Harbor, AK (Contributed Funds) 16. Bethel Bank Stabilization, AK (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 1,083,000 2,540,487 -11,600 254,256 53,241 -109,000 100,000 163,324 104,333 380,088 182,888 3,252 -23,765 29,176 -23,278 6,639,144 2061 6,569,280 1,238,400 17,663 1,234,895 7,000,000 58 5,017,807 3,004,000 554 2,777,682 339,000 19,974,200 229,584 19,823,529 227,000 225,977 -1,523 -500 226,386 218,632 6,728 0 06,728 6,728 82,500 178,219 269,000 81,368 173,840 123,758 -2,017 225,477 225,477 226,386 225,360 260,719 255,208 1,239,380 6,646,173 S 247,290 S 26,596 8,185,000 137,381 247,290 26,596 5,898,000 2,384,000 18,548,854 4,300,238 9,523,085 2,406,578 18,287,966 1,500,000 3,190,000 1,097,556 3,177,444 4,690,000 4,275,000 32-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1998 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 30 Sep 98 17............ Cnena Kiver LaKes, AK (Contrib. Funds) 18. Dillingham Emergency Bank Stabilization 19. Homer Spit Erosion, AK (Contrib. Funds) New WorK Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 214,063,928 6,572 214,054,134 1,880,400 1,243,213 2,229,725 1,825,500 13,658,582 2,279,275 1,262,375 2,150,698 1,246,709 13,136,071 2,182,300 2,145,929 221,000 89,000 2,130,946 -84,000 2,362,515 80,974 206,968 259,967 125,079 678,424 -270,000 3,800,000 92,028 308,798 -344,478 -94,478 100,000 7,540,000 713,382 4,053,257 1,605,522 24,870 1,274,934 2,781,128 32-12 TABLE 32-A ALASKA DISTRICT Table 32-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. Jul. 3, 1958 Oct. 22, 1976 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 12, 1996 Oct. 12, 1996 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK Deep winter harbor, adjacent to docks, dredge to 35 feet below mean lower low water, protected by two jetties.1 Extension of project limits. BETHEL SMALL BOAT HARBOR , AK Protected harbor in the Kuskokwim River Delta area that provides beach moorage for about 1,200 small boats with the possibility of a future medium-draft mooring basin. COOK INLET NAVIGATION, AK Deepen the entrance channel to -30 feet. Enlarge and deepen the maneuvering basin to -29.0 feet with an area of 415 by 830 feet. Wave spending beach to +4 feet. Three offshore reefs each, 1,300 feet long, constructed to a depth of -12 feet. Wave energy channel 100 feet wide with bottom elevation of +2 feet. CHIGNIK HARBOR, AK Deepen the entrance channel to -30 feet. Enlarge and deepen the maneuvering basin to -29.0 feet with an area of 415 by 830 feet. Wave spending beach to +4 feet. Three offshore reefs each, 1,300 feet long, constructed to a depth of -12 feet. Wave energy channel 100 feet wide with bottom elevation of +2 feet. DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK Basin 230,000 square feet in area with depth of 2 feet above MLLW along Scandinavian Creek, with entrance channel 1,100 feet long and 40 feet wide. DOUGLAS HARBOR, AK Basin 5.2 acres with entrance channel both to a depth of -12 feet MLLW and protected by a rock jetty about 90 feet long off the northerly shore of Juneau Isle adjacent to the basin entrance. HOMER HARBOR, AK Basin 2.7 acres in area with depth of 12 feet below mean lower low water, and rock breakwater 1,260 feet long. Relocation and rehabilitation of project destroyed by March 27, 1964 earthquake, by construction of basin 10 acres in area with 12-foot depth over 2.75 acres and 15-foot depth over 7.25 acres protected by rock breakwaters, 1,018 feet and 238 feet long. Increased width and depth of entrance channel and an enlarged staging area. Basin enlarged from 16.5 to 50 acres. KAKE HARBOR, AK Provides for a 1,580 foot long west breakwater and a 900 foot long south breakwater enclosing a 7 acre berthing area at -15 feet MLLW. 32-13 H.Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. 2 P.L. 94-587 Section 107 (P.L. 86-645) as Authorized by the Chief of Engineers, Jun. 29, 1978 Section 101(b)(3), P.L. 104-303 Water Resources Development Act of 1996. Section 101(b)(3), P.L. 104-303 Water Resources Development Act of 1996. H. Doc. 390, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.2 H. Doc. 286, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.2 H.Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.2 P.L. 88-451 Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Nov. 13, 1981 S. Doc. 249, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. 4. Jul. 2, 1958 Aug. 19, 1964 Jul. 14, 1960 8. Aug. 13, 1968 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1998 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents METLAKATLA HARBOR, AK Dredging small boat basin 2.18 acre in extent to a depth of 10 feet below plane of mean lower low water; construction of rubblemound breakwater 900 feet long. Entrance channel and two rubblemound breakwaters enclosing a 7.0 acre basin. NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK Basin 320 feet long by 150 feet wide with depth of 2 feet above mean lower low water, approach channel 400 feet long and 50 feet wide with depth of 9 feet above mean lower low water, protected by 410 foot jetty. NOME HARBOR, AK Two jetties, easterly 335 feet and westerly 460 feet long revetment, channel and basin 200 feet wide and 250 feet long. Extension of the jetties and enlarging basin to 250 feet wide and 600 feet long.3 Seawall SITKA HARBOR, AK Boat harbor consisting of 3 rubblemound breakwaters. ST. GEORGE, AK Dredging the maneuvering area from an average depth of 3 feet above mean lower low water to 18 feet below mean lower low water and dredging the entrance channel from an average depth of 14 feet below mean lower low water to 20 feet below mean lower low water. ST. PAUL ISLAND, AK Add 1,050 feet of breakwater at existing crest height, 37 below feet mean lower low water and 1,000 feet long with a crest height of 18 above mean lower low water. Deepen the entrance channel to -30 feet. Enlarge and deepen the maneuvering basin to -29.0 feet with an area of 415 by 830 feet. Wave spending beach to +4 feet. Three offshore reefs each, 1,300 feet long, constructed to a depth of -12 feet. Wave energy channel 100 feet wide with bottom elevation of +2 feet. Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 32-14 Table 32-B (Continued) 9. H.Doc. 138, 76th Cong., 91st Sess. Section 201, P.L. 89-298 S. Doc. 92-64, 92d Cong., 2d Sess. 2 Authorized Oct. 12, 1972 H.Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.2 H.Doc. 1932, 64th Cong., 1st Sess.2 H.Doc. 404, 71st Cong., 2d Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. Reports of Chief of Engineers dated March 8, 1948 Water Resource Development Act of 1992, H.Doc. 103-37, 103rd Cong., 1st Sess. Section 107 of The Rivers and Harbors Act of 1960, Public Law 86-645, as amended. Section 202, P.L. 99-662 Section 101(b)(3), P.L. 104-303 Water Resources Development Act of 1996. 10. Jul. 3, 1958 11. Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 16, 1948 Oct. 31, 1992 12. 13. Nov. 17, 1986 14. Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 12, 1996 ALASKA DISTRICT Table 32-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 15. WRANGELL HARBOR, AK Sep. 22, 1922 Breakwater 300 feet long to protect southern portion of harbor. H.Doc. 161, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. Mooring basin 600 feet long, 400 feet wide, and 10 feet deep. Aug. 30, 1935 Inner basin and connecting channel from the existing mooring H.Doc. 202, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Mar. 2, 1945 basin, both 10 feet deep at mean lower low water, and breakwater H.Doc. 284, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. 320 feet long on the reef north of Snakes Island. 16. BETHEL BANK STABILIZATION, AK Nov. 17, 1986 Streambank protection by placing riprap along 8,500 feet of river- Section 202, P.L. 99-662 bank. 17. CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK Aug. 13, 1968 Provides for construction of a dam and floodway for the Chena H. Doc. 148, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. River (17 miles east of Fairbanks) for a dam and reservoir on the P.L. 90-483 Little Chena River, and for a 27 mile long levee system with interior drainage works on the north side of the Tanana River. 18. Dec. 19, 1985 DILLINGHAM EMERGENCY BANK STABILIZATION, Sec. 114 P.L. 99-190 AK Install 1,600 feet of steel sheetpile bulkhead along the toe of the bluff from the Dillingham city cargo dock to Snag Point. 19. HOMER SPIT, AK Nov. 28, 1990 Extension of an existing rubblemound revetment along an existing Sec. 101, Water Resource Development sheetpile wall to provide protection and nourishment along a 1400 Act of 1990, Nov. 13,1995 foot portion of State highway. P.L. 101-640, 101st Cong. P.L. 104-65, Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1996 1. Purchase of dredge and deepwater jetties deauthorized November 6, 1977 under section 12, Public Law 93-251. 2. Contains latest published map. 3. Extension of jetties classified "inactive". 4. Little Chena Dam deauthorized in 1991. 32-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1998 Project Apoon Mouth of Yukon River, AK' Bar Point Harbor, AK2 Bethel Small Boat Harbor, AK Cook Inlet Shoals, AK Cordova Harbor, AK2 Cordova, AK Craig Harbor, AK Douglas Harbor, AK Dry Pass, AK Egegik River, AK Elfin Cove, AK Gastineau Channel, AK Haines Harbor, AK2 Homer Harbor, AK2 Hoonah Harbor, AK Humboldt Harbor, AK Iliuliuk Harbor, AK Juneau Harbor, AK Kake Harbor, AK Kasilof Harbor, AK2 Ketchikan Harbor, AK Kodiak Harbor, AK Mekorykuk, AK Myers Chuck Harbor, AK Naknek River, AK Neva and Olga Straits, AK Old Harbor, Kodiak Island, AK 2 Pelican Harbor, AK Petersburg Harbor, AK Port Alexander, AK Port Lions, AK2 Rocky Pass, AK St. Michael Canal, AK Seldovia Harbor, AK Sergius Whitestone, AK Seward Harbor, AK Sitka Harbor, AK Skagway Harbor, AK Stikine River, AK Valdez Harbor, AK Wrangell Narrows, AK 1. Abandonment recommended in H.Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 107). 3. In addition, $272,779 of State funds. 4. Includes $656,240 for Sec. 107 project. 5. In addition, $925,500 of State funds. 6. In addition, $973,875 of State funds. 32-16 TABLE 32-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS - - Status Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Active Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed For Last Cost to Sep Full Report ( See Annual Report for Construction Mai 1920 128,896 1983 2,000,0003 1985 1,520,272 1977 1,220,000 1978 843,534 1986 9,642,000 1983 1,033,5004 1963 282,019 1983 943,351 1972 4,441 1959 154,191 1964 789,461 1977 1,000,0005 1987 2,000,000 1983 4,255,0006 1977 3,679,6837 1941 66,037 1974 1,381,150 1991 870,700 1975 109,848 1979 1,602,417 1973 1,891,2128 1986 1,372,139 1970 9,700 1961 20,789 1960 155,009 1972 370,415 1964 369,683 1972 252,932 1949 17,000 1986 1,825,311 1960 337,668 1916 377,062 1974 1,051,8839 1973 1,798,010 1973 712,36910 1973 1,611,009 1972 133,180 1987 1968 649,740" 1979 3,562,343 7. In addition, $857,000 of State funds. 8. Includes $594,163 for rehabilitation. 9. Includes $400,000 for rehabilitation. 10. Includes $90,026 for rehabilitation and $2,528 Code 710. Recreation facilities at Completed projects. 11. Includes $73,000 for rehabilitation and $2,713 Code 710. Recreation facilities at Completed projects. . 30, 1994 )peration and intenance 2,154 5,000 488,156 72,500 23,466 3,107 102,701 260,991 331,256 37,946 132,946 18,973 26,800 560 5,518 1,934 219,789 15,400 32,665 8,804 221,498 309,260 ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 32-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1994 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Bethel Bank, Kuskokwim River' Completed 1985 553,970 Fairbanks, Tanana River & Chena Slough, AK Completed 1943 557,000 Gold Creek, AK Completed 1975 876,0062 4,301 Klutina River, Copper Center, AK3 Completed 1973 260,681 Lowell Creek, AK4 Completed 1945 416,3825 30,771 Salmon River, AK Completed 1963 37,7706 7 162,9258 Talkeetna River, AK Completed 1981 516,694 1. Section 14. 5. In addition $25,000 expended from contributed funds. 2. In addition, $25,000 expended from contributed funds. 6. Includes $34,197 of PWA funds. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205). 7. In addition, $7,000 expended from contributed funds. 4. During FY88, $551,690 was expended from FC and CE. 8. In addition, $27,400 expended from contributed funds. TABLE 32-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended Allison Lake, AK (Valdez Hydropower) 1992 Anchorage Harbor, AK (Uncompleted Portion) 1967 1977 Bradley Lake, AK 1983 1983 1982 46,701,000 Ketchikan Harbor, AK (West Breakwater) 1979 1979 Port Alexander, AK (Inner Harbor) 1949 1977 Tolovana River, AK (Snagging) 1931 1977 Little Chena River Dam 1983 1990 Long Lake Dam 1975 1990 Myers Chuck Harbor, AK 1970 1991 9,700 Scammon Bay, AK 1992 Skagway River, AK 1966 1991 26,385 32-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1998 TABLE 32-H NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs King Cove, AK Larsen Bay, AK Metlakatla, AK Ouzinkie, AK Tatitlek, AK Ketchikan, AK Whittier, AK Haines, AK Unalaska, AK 152,067 722,176 25,905 1,981,639 28,698 25,867 7,429 31,668 27,051 3,002,500 TOTAL TABLE 32-I PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Name of Project Date Date Survey Conducted Bethel Harbor June 1998 Gastineau Channel April 1998 Hoonah April 1998 Humboldt Harbor July 1998 Illiuliuk Channel (Dutch Harbor) July 1998 Ketchikan Bar Point Harbor March 1998 Ketchikan Thomas Basin Harbor March 1998 King Cove Harbor July 1998 Mountain Point Breakwater March 1998 Old Harbor July 1998 Port Lions Harbor July 1998 Wrangell Harbor April 1998 Wrangell Narrows (Mi. 9.5 and 12.2-18.4) November 1998 32-18 v ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 32-J STREAM BANK EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION EROSION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 14, PUBLIC LAW 79-526, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Deering, AK 89,279 Emmonak, AK 539,367 Homer, AK 25,150 Glacier Street, Whittier, AK 15,466 Bering Sea, Shishmaref, AK 14,539 Noatak, AK 5,369 TOTAL 689,170 TABLE 32-K ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 1135, PUBLIC LAW 99-662 Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Valdez Harbor, AK Talkeetna, AK TOTAL 5,677 57,476 63,153 32-19 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT * This district (total area about 230,000 square miles) comprises those drainage basins tributary to the Pacific Ocean that are in California between the Mexican boundary and Cape San Martin (about 265 miles north of the entrance to the Los Angeles Harbor). The lower Colorado River drainage basin (below Lee Ferry, AZ.) which is southeastern California, southeastern Nevada, southwestern Utah, and all of Arizona, except the northeastern corner; that part of the Great Basin that is in southern Nevada and southeastern California; and the southern Arizona that drain southward into Mexico. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Channel Islands Harbor, CA 2. LA-LB Harbor (LA Harbor), CA 3. Marina Del Rey, CA 4. Morro Bay Harbor, CA 5. Newport Bay Harbor, CA 6. Oceanside Harbor, CA 7. Oceanside Harbor Sand By-Pass, CA 8. Port Hueneme, CA 9. Port of Long Beach (Deepening), CA 10. Redondo Beach Harbor (King Harbor), CA 11. San Diego Harbor, CA 12. San Diego River and Mission Bay, CA 13. Santa Barbara Harbor, CA 14. Santa Monica Breakwater, CA 15. Surfside, Sunset and Newport Beach, CA 16. Ventura Harbor, CA Flood Control 17. Alamo Dam, AZ 18. Clifton, AZ 19. Hansen Dam, LACDA, CA (Recreation Development) 20. Lake Elsinore, CA 21. Los Angeles County Drainage Area, CA 22. Los Angeles River, Sepulveda To Arroyo Seco, CA (Recreation Development) 23. Mojave River Dam, Mojave River Basin, CA 24. Nogales Wash, AZ 25. Norco Bluffs, CA 26. Painted Rock Dam (Gila River), AZ 27. Pine and Mathews Canyons Dam, Colorado RB, NV 28. Rillito River, AZ 29. Santa Ana River Mainstem, CA 30. Santa Ana River Basin and Orange County, CA 31. Santa Paula Creek, CA 32. San Luis Rey River, CA 33. Sepulveda Dam, CA (Recreation Development) 34. Sweetwater River, CA Page 33-02 33-02 33-02 33-03 33-03 33-03 33-03 33-04 33-04 33-04 33-04 33-05 33-05 33-05 33-05 33-05 33-06 33-06 33-06 33-06 33-06 33-07 33-07 33-07 33-07 33-08 33-08 33-08 33-08 33-09 33-09 33-09 33-09 33-09 35. Tropicana and Flamingo Washes, NV 36. Tucson Diversion Channel, AZ (Recreation Development) 37. Whitlow Ranch Dam, Queen Creek, AZ 38. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects 39. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 40. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization (Projects Not Specifically Authorized) 41. Emergency Response Activities Program General Investigations 42. Surveys 43. Collection and Study of Basic Data 44. Preconstruction Engineering and Design 44A Rio Salado, Phoenix Reach, AZ 44B. Rio Salado, Tempe Reach, AZ 44C. Tucson Drainage Area, AZ Tables Table 33-A Cost and Financial Statement Table 33-B Authorizing Legislation Table 33-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects Table 33-D Other Authorized Shore Protection (formerly Beach Erosion Control) Projects Table 33-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects Table 33-G Deauthorized Projects Table-33-H Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys Table-33-I Inspection of Completed Beach Erosion Control Projects/Flood Control Projects Table 33-J Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858, as Amended (Preauthorization) 33-1 33-10 33-10 33-10 33-10 33-10 33-11 33-11 33-11 33-11 33-11 33-12 33-12 33-12 33-13 33-17 33-27 33-28 33-29 33-31 33-32 33-33 33-34 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 NAVIGATION 1. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA Location. On the coast of southern California about a mile northwest of Port Hueneme, 65 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor, and 345 miles south of San Francisco. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 5007 and 5202). Existing project. For details see page 33-2 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. For details see page 33-2 of Annual Report for 1989. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging was performed placing about 500,000 cyds on Silver Strand Beach and about 1,200,000 cyds on Hueneme Beach. Project condition is good. 2. LOS ANGELES-LONG BEACH HARBORS, CA Location. On the coast of southern California in San Pedro bay about 25 miles south of the city of Los Angeles, about 96 miles northwest of San Diego Harbor, and about 410 miles southeast of San Francisco Harbor. Existing project. The project consists of four increments of dredging to be constructed in two stages - deepening the existing entrance channel for the Port of Los Angeles and providing new channels to existing and new port facilities. The dredge material will be used for fill to create Pier 400. Estimated cost (October 1998) for existing project is $401,000,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $116,500,000 is Federal ($116,200,000 Corps and $300,000 U.S. Coast Guard) and $284,500,000 is non- Federal. Local cooperation. All items of local cooperation required under the terms of the previous authorizing acts have been fully complied with. See page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1981 for requirements under the terms of the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. The revised recommended project was changed due to the withdrawal of the Port of Long Beach on October 1, 1991. The Port of Los Angeles, the local sponsor, will receive credit, for advance work (Stage 1) performed per WRDA 1988. Project Cooperation Agreement was executed March 18, 1997. Terminal Facilities. In Los Angeles Harbor, 82,553 feet of wharves, of which 75,729 feet are owned by the city and 6,824 feet are owned by private interest. The final report presented and recommended four project increments. Increment No. 2 would deepen the existing Los Angeles Harbor approach and entrance channels to Pier 300 to provide better access to dry bulk facilities. Increment No. 3 would further deepen the Los Angeles approach and entrance channel to Pier 300 and part of Pier 400, and deepen a south channel to provide access to the eastern side of Pier 400 and liquid bulk facilities. Increments No. 4 and 5 would extend Increment No. 3 of Los Angeles to provide access to container terminals that would be located on part of Pier 300 and Pier 400. The material obtained from the dredging will be used to create new landfill within the port and shallow water habitat for the least tern. Operations during fiscal year. Initiated engineering and design for maintenance dredging of the LA River Estuary and continued the Dredged Materials Study. A Comprehensive Condition Survey of San Pedro Breakwater (west) indicated that the structures elevation is below project design. It is expected that the current elevation for the Middle Breakwater (detached) and Long Beach Breakwater (east-detached) will also be lower than the original elevation. Project condition is fair. The Corps prepared plans and specifications, and awarded construction of Stage 2 in May 1997 with completion planned in FY 2000. 3. MARINA DEL REY, CA Location. Marina Del Rey is located on Santa Monica Bay, 15 miles west of downtown Los Angeles, 29 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor and 390 miles southeast of San Francisco Bay. Existing project. For details see page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1981. Existing Federal navigation project consists of two jetties a breakwater and navigation channels. A severe shoaling problem in the harbor is complicated by contaminated materials, causing costly maintenance and a potential threat to navigation. Local cooperation. County of Los Angeles Department of Beaches and Harbors requested a new study, and expressed local support by letter dated August 5, 1992. Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement signed February 21, 1997. Terminal facilities. Marina del Rey is homeport to about 15 commercial fishing boats and 50 other transit boats with an annual fish catch valued at approximately $10 million. There are about ten charter boat and five tour boat operations used by over 100,000 people each year and over 6,000 berths servicing recreational craft within the harbor. Eight yacht clubs call the 33-2 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT marina homeport. The marina offers sailing instruction, boat rental, repair and storage, harbor tours, sport fishing, retail facilities, coffee shops, snack bars and fine restaurants. The U.S. Coast Guard has a cutter permanently assigned to the harbor. Operations during fiscal year. There are elevated levels of contaminants contained within the Marina's sediments. Portions of the Marina's sediments unsuitable for unrestricted open disposal. Efforts were underway to identify suitable disposal areas for these sediments and investigate potential source of contaminants and establish necessary control measures. Maintenance dredging to open the North Entrance Channel was accomplished. Project condition is fair. 4. MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA Location. On coast of southern California 110 miles south of Monterey Bay, 120 miles northwest of Santa Barbara Harbor, and nearly midway between San Francisco and Los Angeles. (see Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5387). Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1980. Local cooperation. Project Cooperation Agreement executed on April 7, 1995. Terminal facilities. Facilities which are adequate for existing commerce, comprise 640 feet of existing piers and 150 feet of floating docks constructed by San Luis Obispo County; 263 feet of floating docks constructed by California Department on Parks and Recreation; 1,396 feet of floating docks constructed by the city of Morro Bay; 1,398 feet of privately owned piers; and 5,435 feet of privately owned floating docks. Operations during the fiscal year. Maintenance dredging of entrance channel was performed. Project condition is good. 5. NEWPORT BAY HARBOR, CA. Location. Forty miles southeast of Los Angeles. Existing project. Provides rubble mound entrance jetties, 920- foot deep and 500 foot wide entrance channel and main channel, inner channels, a turning basin, and anchorage areas. Upper Newport is a shallow 800 acre Marine Estuary. Navigation project maintained by Corps of Engineers. Pursuant to Section 841 and subject to Section 903 (b) of WRDA, 1986 the project for navigation for the Harbor is modified to dredge and maintain a 250-foot wide channel in Upper Newport Bay to boundary of Upper Newport Bay State Ecological Preserve to a depth of 15- feet. Local cooperation. In a resolution dated August 20, 1996, Orange County Board of Supervisors indicated strong support of feasibility study and understanding of cost sharing requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging contract initiated for the Upper Channel in Newport Bay Harbor. Project condition is good. 6. OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA Location. On the coast of southern California at Oceanside, about 30 miles north of City of San Diego and 80 miles south of Los Angeles. Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Oceanside Small Harbor Craft District sent letter of support dated April 1985 and Letter of intent in March 1989. Project Cooperation Agreement, executed in January 1993. Terminal Facilities. Berthing for 957 boats, single-tie slips, 38 double-tie slips and 136 side-ties, of which 54 are visitors' slips; 12 dry storage spaces at Oceanside Marine Center; a fuel dock; a boat hoist; a launching ramp, which can accommodate 4 launchings at the same time; parking for 1,732 cars; with temporary parking for about 141 boat trailers; a boat-repair facility; a pump-out facility; a Coast Guard cutter; restaurants; retail stores; yacht brokers; a hotel/motel; condominiums; and a sport-fishing facility. Navigation improvements includes new dredging and biannual dredging of expanded entrance channel area. Operations during the fiscal year. Routine annual maintenance dredging was performed including associated hydrographic survey. Project condition is good. 7. OCEANSIDE HARBOR SAND BYPASS, CA Location. On the coast of southern California along Oceanside Beach near jetty, about 30 miles north of city of San Diego and 80 miles south of Los Angeles. Existing project. Underwater experimental pumping system with the pumps, fluidizers, and submerged pipeline to remove sand from harbor entrance and deposit it to down coast beaches, on a continual basis. Phase I and Phase II have both been completed and successfully tested. The experiment is complete and we have determined the bypass technology can be installed with a successful operation but, not at Oceanside. Local cooperation. City of Oceanside officials are in full support of the closure of the experimental bypass project. 33-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Operation during fiscal year. A contract to dismantle the System was awarded. Dismantling and demobilization have been completed. Project closeout is being completed. 8. PORT HUENEME, CA Location. On the coast of southern California about 65 miles northwest of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, about one mile southeast of Channel Islands Harbor, immediately west of the City of Port Hueneme, four miles southwest of the City of Oxnard, and 10 miles southeast of the City of Ventura. Existing Project. Authorized in 1970 for restudy of completed project. The harbor serves both military and commercial uses with port facilities consisting of terminals, wharves, and warehouses serving a wide variety of products. The existing Federal project consists of an approach channel, entrance channel, central basin, and two rubblemound jetties. The Navy has plans to utilize the harbor more extensively for vessel berthing and repair; effectively reducing maneuverability in the harbor. Harbor District would like to use deeper draft wood pulp carrier vessels and possibly tankers. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1976. The Oxnard Harbor District reviewed and agreed to sign the Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement on January 3, 1996. Operation during the fiscal year. Hydrographic survey performed July 1997. Project condition is fair 9. PORT OF LONG BEACH (DEEPENING), CA Location. On the coast of southern California along the Pacific Coast in San Pedro Bay about 20 miles south of downtown Los Angeles. Existing Project. The recommended plan consists of deepening the approach channel to -76 MLLW, from breakwater seaward, a distance of about 2 miles to accommodate deep draft crude tankers. WRDA 1996 authorized project in accordance with the July 1996 Chief of Engineers Report. The estimated cost of the project (October 98) is $43,350,000. Local cooperation. The Port of Long Beach is the local sponsor. The Project Cooperation Agreement was executed in July 1998. Operation during the fiscal year. The base contract was awarded August 1998 to dredge -69 feet MLLW. 10. REDONDO BEACH HARBOR (KING HARBOR), CA Location. On the coast of southern California on the southern portion of Santa Monica Bay, about 17 miles southwest of Los Angeles. Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1981. WRDA of 1986 (H.R. 6) Conference Bill, Title VIII - Project Modification, Section 809 - King Harbor, Redondo Beach, CA modifies the King Harbor project in order to carry out maintenance dredging and for breakwater construction, and authorized the Secretary to restore the breakwater to a height of 22 feet and maintain breakwater at such height to provide greater protection from heavy wave action. Local cooperation. City of Redondo Beach officials are in full support of the study and have indicated desire to construct improvements to reduce continued storm related damages. Operations during fiscal year. Repairs to North Breakwater completed in December 1998. A condition survey of the North Breakwater has indicated structural support failure to the armor stone in areas along the landward side (inner harbor) and a sloughed area on the seaward side in the middle of the breakwater. Neither condition jeopardizes the structure and both will be monitored closely. Project condition is good. 11. SAN DIEGO HARBOR, CA Location. On the coast of southern California just north of the Mexican border, about 109 miles southeast of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5107). Existing project. For details, see pages 33 and 34 of Annual Report for 1980. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on pages 33 to 35 of Annual Report for 1980. Terminal facilities. Consist of 45,070 feet of wharves, exclusive of Government-owned and 24,000 feet are privately owned. Government-owned wharves at North Island are restricted to military use only. Operations during fiscal year. Performed hydrographic survey. Project condition is good. 33-4 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT 12. SAN DIEGO RIVER AND MISSION BAY, CA Location. The project is located at the mouth of the San Diego River about six miles northwest of the San Diego business district, San Diego County, California. Existing project. For details, see page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1991. Authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1944, the existing project consists of a levee channel, entrance channel, main channel, altered railroad bridge, anchorage basins (West Anchorage and Quivira) and three jetties. Construction of a 1,200-foot long weir restored design conveyance capacity at the mouth of the San Diego River. A sand plug in mouth of river reduced flood carrying capability from 115,000 cfs to 35,000 cfs, equal to a 100-year flood. The temporary timber pile breakwater at Quivira Basin was replaced with a permanent rubble mound breakwater. Local cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed July 1996 with the city of San Diego. Operations during the fiscal year. Hydro survey performed. Project condition is good. 13. SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA Location. On the coast of southern California, 90 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor. Existing project. For details on original, see page 33-4 Annual Report for 1983. For reevaluation details see WRDA, 1986. The recommended plan includes acquiring a permanent dredge for the city and they will assume the operation and maintenance of the channel. Local cooperation. See page 1015 of Annual Report for 1969, for items of local cooperation under 1962 authorized modification of existing project. The city reaffirmed its support on February 8, 1994. Operations during fiscal year. Routine annual maintenance dredging was performed including associated hydro surveys. Project condition is good. 14. SANTA MONICA BREAKWATER, CA Location. Santa Monica Breakwater is located seaward of the Santa Monica Pier, approximately 15 miles west of downtown Los Angeles. Existing breakwater is 2,000 feet long and lies 1,300 feet from the shoreline. Existing project. The project plan comprises reconstruction of 900 feet of the southern end of the existing breakwater to an elevation of +10 feet MLLW for storm damage prevention and constructing an offshore boulder-field for fish habitat. The local sponsor will provide 12 moorings and other boating support facilities to reestablish commercial boating opportunities. WRDA 1996 authorized the project. The estimated cost of the project is $7,200,000 (Federal cost is $4,700,000 which includes $40,000 US Coast Guard; Non-Federal cost is $2,500,000). Local cooperation. City of Santa Monica, the local sponsor, indicated its support for the recommended plan and its willingness and intent to execute the Project Cooperation Agreement, scheduled to be signed June 1999. Operations during fiscal year. Negotiate Project Cooperation Agreement and prepare draft Project Cooperation Agreement package. 15. SURFSIDE, SUNSET AND NEWPORT BEACH, CA Location. Project extends along Orange County Coast, 17 miles, from San Gabriel River mouth down coast to Newport Bay Harbor entrance. Existing project. Authorization Section 101 of Rivers and Harbors Act 1962. Project is a periodic continuing construction project. Local cooperation. State of California, Orange County, Cities of Newport and Huntington Beach, and Surfside Colony. Letter of Intent dated August 11, 1995 from the State of California Department of Boating and Waterways, coordinating sponsor. Funding agreement with the State of California was executed on April 30, 1996. Operations during the fiscal year. None. 16. VENTURA HARBOR, CA Location. Located 65 miles northwest of Los Angeles and six miles northwest of Channel Island Harbor. Existing project. For details, see page 33-5 of the Annual Report for 1981. Reevaluation under WRDA 1990 consists of modification to the exiting harbor by constructing a separate South Beach groin, extending the offshore breakwater, adding a spur groin to the north jetty and detached breakwater, and deepening and extending the entrance channel and sand trap. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Routine annual maintenance dredging was performed including associated hydro surveys. A 33-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 contract was awarded for the repair of the south jetty and work completed in November 1998. Hydro survey performed December 1998. Project condition is good except for the damage on the Detached Breakwater which occurred during the El Nino storms. FLOOD CONTROL 17. ALAMO DAM, AZ Location. About 70 miles southeast of Kingman,Arizona on the Bill Williams River, Arizona a tributary of the Colorado River. Existing project. For details, see page 33-7 of Annual Report 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. The downstream gage damaged by flood flows in 1993 and 1994 was repaired. Routine operations and maintenance activities were performed and a periodic inspection of the project was completed. The Alamo Risk Assessment Study initiated in FY98 scheduled for completion in FY99 will provide information useful to the Alternate Spillway Study. Project condition is good. 18. CLIFTON, AZ Location. Located on San Francisco River approximately 170 miles northeast of Tucson in Greenlee County, AZ. Existing project. The project consists of both structural and nonstructural elements, including an earthfill levee about 3,000 feet long, with floodgates and flood walls. Implementation will involve flood proofing of 11 businesses, flood plain evacuation plans, and recreation development. Estimated cost (October 1998) for existing project is $24,100,000 (includes $2,600,000 cash contribution and $5,400,000 other costs). Local cooperation. The State of Arizona, Division of Emergency Services, is the local sponsor. Project Cooperation Agreement executed on July 30, 1993. Operations during fiscal year. Construction of the levee and flood wall was completed August 1995 and turned over to sponsor December 1996. Continue non-structural relocation. 19. HANSEN DAM LACDA, CA (RECREATION DEVELOPMENT) Location. In the San Fernando Valley area of the city of Los Angeles about 20 miles northwest of downtown Los Angeles. Recreation lake and facilities lie within flood control basin boundaries. Existing project. Original project authorized under Flood Control Act 1936, and modified by WRDA 1986, Section 847 Energy and Water Development Act 1992 (PL 102-104). Project consists of two phases. Phase 1 is the escavation of the lake, and rough grading of the roadways and building pad locations. Phase 2 is the construction of a 10.5-acre recreation lake, picnic facilities, access roads, parking lots, and landscaping. Local cooperation. Project is 50/50 cost shared with the City of Los Angeles. Operations during fiscal year Phase 1 was completed in December 1997. Phase 2 initiated February 1998 and is scheduled for completion in July 1999. 20. LAKE ELSINORE, CA Location. In Riverside County, about 70 miles southeast of downtown Los Angeles, and 30 miles southeast of the city of Corona. Existing project. The project consists of an earthen-trapezoid outlet channel about 2.5 miles long, with a 30-foot to 80-foot base and IV on H. side slopes. The outlet channel will relieve flooding at the 100-year-flood level around the perimeter of the lake. The project included building six bridges and protecting an endangered species habitat. The project was completed in September 1993. Construction contract closed out September 1997. Amendment to Local Cooperation Agreement executed August 27, 1998. Confirmation of real estate credit initiated August 1998. Local cooperation. Riverside County Flood Control Water Conservation District signed a Local Cooperation Agreement March 27, 1992. Operations during fiscal year. Revised project cooperation agreement to reflect Federal expenditures for the flood control project at $7,500,000. Initiated Sec 205 study report addressing advisability of modifying the project for flood control. 21. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA Location. Along Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers, Rio Hondo, and Compton Creek, CA. 33-6 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT Existing project. Project consists of channel improvement to lower Los Angeles, Rio Hondo Rivers, Compton Creek, and modification/replacement of as many as 27 bridges necessitated by the channel improvements. A map of the rehabilitation plan is in "General Design Memorandum, Los Angeles River Rehabilitation under the Major Rehabilitation Program," dated January 1984 and revised in March 1984. Estimated cost (October 1998) for existing project is $200,000,000 of which $150,000,000 is Federal and $50,000,000 is non-Federal (includes $41,400,000 cash contribution and $8,600,000 other costs). Local cooperation. In February 1992, the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, the local sponsor, affirmed its support and willingness to financially participate in the construction of the project at a level consistent with the current cost-sharing policy for construction. The Project Cooperation Agreement was executed 7 August 1995. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance were conducted. The soft-bottom Clean out of Compton Creek Channel was completed. Seismic Study of Whittier Narrows Dam was conducted. Massive channel Clean out efforts were being conducted in anticipation of El Nino storms. The fencing repair contract for Compton Creek Channel was completed. An A/E contract to provide for the ERGO Cycle 2 requirements was awarded and work began late in FY98. A contract to excavate Haines Canyon Debris Basin was also awarded. Project condition of dams and channels is good. Pier nose extension pkg #1, which consists of 3 bridges crossing the Los Angeles River at Willow Street, DeLano Boulevard and a Metro Transit Authority light rail bridge, was awarded in August 1996 and completed Nov 1997. Pier nose #2, which consists of 2 bridges crossing the Los Angeles River at Atlantic and Artesia Avenues, was awarded May 1998 and scheduled to complete January 1999. 22. LOS ANGELES RIVER, SEPULVEDA TO ARROYO SECO, CA (RECREATION DEVELOPMENT) Location. Upper Los Angeles River from Sepulveda Flood Control Basin (located 25 miles northwest of the city of Los Angeles) to the confluence of the Arroyo Seco channel, a distance of 20 miles. Existing project. The Upper Los Angeles River consists primarily of a rectangular channel from the Sepulveda Basin to a point approximately four miles above the Arroyo Seco as a trapezoidal channel of the Arroyo Seco. Local cooperation. Project is 50/50 cost shared with City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation. Operations during fiscal year. Funds in the amount of $400,000 were provided in Fiscal Year 1998 to initiate and complete a master plan. Final Master Plan and NEPA completed March 1998. 23. MOJAVE RIVER DAM, MOJAVE RIVER BASIN, CA (MOHAVE RESERVOIR) RIVER Location. On Mojave River at the Forks site, just downstream from the mouth of Deep Creek and about 14 miles upstream from Victorville, in Mojave River Basin, CA. Existing project. For details, see page 33-8 of Annual Report for 1983. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. A periodic inspection was conducted and routine O&M activities were performed. Project condition is good. U.S. Forest Service has informed the District of a lawsuit filed pursuant to the Endangered Species Act by the Southwest Center for Biological Diversity on behalf of the endangered Arroyo Toad. The lawsuit alleges the USFS is allowing "taking" of the endangered species. As a property owner the Corps may be implicated as well. Local agencies have indicated interest in operating and maintaining recreational development immediately upstream and downstream of the dam. This will help in control access. 24. NOGALES WASH, AZ Location. At the Mexican Border, in extreme southern Arizona in central and northern portions of the city of Nogales, about 60 miles south of Tucson. Existing project. Current plan includes a flood warning system in Mexico and United States. Estimated cost (October 1998) for existing project is $654,000, $523,000 of which is Federal and $131,000 is non-Federal. Local cooperation. Project Cooperation Agreement scheduled for execution in the last quarter of FY1999. Negotiating agreement with Mexico through U.S. International Boundary and Water Commission. Operation during fiscal year. Limited Reevaluation Report prepared to satisfy the requirements of Section 303 and Section 404, WRDA 1996. 25. NORCO BLUFFS, SANTA ANA RIVER, CA Location. Located approximately 40 miles southeast of Los 33-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Angeles, in the city of Norco, along a 3.75 mile stretch of the south bank of the Santa Ana River. Existing Project. The project consists of a structural solution of revetted buttress fill using existing and imported fill material one reach, a distance of 1 mile. The bluff stabilization protects a 65- foot high bluff from further retreat into a residential neighborhood which results when flood flows occur in the Santa Ana River. Estimated cost (October 1998) is $7,374,000 of which $5,580,000 is Federal and $1,794,000 is non-Federal. Local cooperation. Local sponsor, Riverside County Flood Control District, expressed support to sign the Project Cooperation Agreement in February 1999. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction engineering design agreement executed February 17, 1998. 26. PAINTED ROCK DAM (GILA RIVER), AZ Location. About 20 miles northwest of Gila Bend, and 120 miles southwest of Phoenix, AZ. Existing project. For details, see page 33-9 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on 33-9 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance were performed. The (native American) cemetery dike was repaired. Engineering and design for the final repair of the damage caused by spillway flow in 1993 was completed. A Periodic Inspection was initiated. Project condition is fair. 27. PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS DAMS, COLORADO RIVER BASIN, NV Location. In Lincoln County, NV, about 100 miles north of Hoover Dam and about 17 and 20 miles, respectively, east of Caliente, NV. Existing project. For details, see page 33-13 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance were performed. Project condition is good. 28. RILLITO RIVER, AZ Location. The project is located in Tucson metropolitan area of Pima County, AZ. Existing project. Plan of improvement includes: 1) an upstream equestrian staging area; 2) an upstream rest area; 3) a downstream rest area; 4) esthetic treatment planting; 5) construction of 16 pedestrian bridges; and 6) continue work on the Limited Reevaluation Report for Tanque Verde. Estimated cost (October 1998) for existing project is $40,000,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $28,600,000 is Federal and $11,400,000 is non-Federal. Flood control portion is $34,215,468 and recreation is $5,784,532. Local cooperation. Pima County Transportation and Flood Control District submitted letters of assurance on February 24, 1986 and May 6, 1987. Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed in June 1994. Amendment to PCA for third increment was executed on September 16, 1998. Operation during fiscal year. Phase III construction contract was awarded September 1998 and is scheduled for completion in February 2000. 29. SANTA ANA MAINSTEM, CA Location. Along a 75-mile reach of the Santa Ana River in San Bernardino, Riverside, and Orange Counties, emptying into the Pacific Ocean between the cities of Newport Beach and Huntington Harbor, 50 miles south of Los Angeles, and 90 miles north of San Diego. Existing project. For details, see page 33-9 of the Annual Report for 1987. Plan of improvement: Seven Oaks Dam, management of overflow area - Seven Oaks to Prado; raise Mill Creek Levee; additional storage at Prado; improvements along: Oak Street Drain/Riverside Co., Santiago Creek/Orange Co., San Timoteo Creek/San Bernardino Co., and Lower Santa Ana River; recreation development: mitigation and preservation. Estimated cost (October 1998) for existing project is for $1,346,000,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $896,000,000 is Federal and $450,000,000 is non-Federal ($64,240,000 cash contribution and $385,760,000 other cost). Local cooperation. Counties of San Bernardino, Riverside, and Orange. Project Cooperation Agreement was signed on December 14, 1989. Operations during fiscal year. Continue engineering and design on the Lower Santa Ana river, Santiago Creek, Prado Dam and San Timoteo Reach 3B. Continue construction of 33-8 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT Seven Oaks Dam and San Timoteo Reach 2 and 3A. Completed construction on Lower Santa Ana River, Reach 7. 30. SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN AND ORANGE COUNTY, CA. Location. On the Santa Ana River and tributaries and on other streams in Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, CA. Existing project. For details on units, see Annual Report for 1968. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Orange County Water District advocated an increase in water conservation at Prado Dam up to elevation 505'. Prado Basin includes significant riparian wetlands, including nesting areas of the endangered least Bell's vireo. The Basin is currently under review as proposed critical habitat for the vireo. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance were performed and a Hydraulic Fracturing Study was conducted at San Antonio Dam. Project condition of dams and channels is good. 31. SANTA PAULA CREEK, CA Location. Santa Paula Creek is a tributary of the Santa Clara River in the vicinity of the city of Santa Paula, Ventura County, about 16 miles from the ocean and approximately 60 miles northwest of downtown Los Angeles. Existing project. Authorized by Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611 (HD 443/80/1) and for details see Annual Report FY91, page 33-10. Estimated cost (October 1998) for existing project is $37,600,000, of which $36,000,000 is Federal and $1,600,000 is non-Federal (includes $0 cash contribution and $1,600,000 other costs). Local cooperation. Ventura County Flood Control District. No authorization is required; therefore, the existing Sec 221 Agreement is still binding and was amended in September 1996. Operations during fiscal year. Debris due to storms of 1991- 1992 and 1992-1993 caused damage to existing phase one channel. First channel repair completed in May 1993, second repair contract initiated in January 1994. Conference held in May 1993 identified some justifiable alternatives for the reevaluation study regarding deteriorating reach of original project. Injunction for failing to comply with NEPA was lifted in April 1998. Design work completed for Phase II upstream channel. 32. SAN LUIS REY RIVER, CA Location. Along the lower 7.2 miles of the San Luis Rey River, in and around the city of Oceanside, San Diego County, about 86 miles south of Los Angeles. Existing project. A double levee, 5.4 miles long; stone protected channel with a soft bottom; 1,330 feet of parapet walls at the ocean on the north and south levees; six interior drainage ponds; and a five-mile bike trail. The Water Resource Development Act of 1996 reauthorized the project. Estimated cost (October 1998) $81,600,000 of which $61,100,000 is Federal and $20,500,000 is non-Federal (including $4,100,000 cash contribution). Local cooperation. Final Local Cooperation Agreement signed by city of Oceanside and Secretary of Army 13 May 1988. Operations during fiscal year. Continue design work for relief well construction in Fiscal Year 1999. 33. SEPULVEDA DAM, CA (RECREATION DEVELOPMENT) Location. The project is located between the communities of Encino and Van Nuys, 15 miles northwest of Los Angeles. Existing project. Flood Control Act 1936 and Public Law 77- 387 1941, and 1989-1972. Primary project purpose is flood control. Subsequent Act of Congress authorized a secondary project purpose for park and recreation. Local cooperation. The recreation project is 50/50 cost shared with the City of Los Angeles. Federal funds will complete Lake Balboa and park with comfort station, trails, fencing, irrigation, children's play area and revegetation and develop an additional wildlife area. The city will continue reclaimed water distribution and develop several park areas. Operations during fiscal year. Continued recreation development. 34. SWEETWATER RIVER, CA Location. The project empties into San Diego Bay in the city of Chula Vista and National City and unincorporated San Diego County, four miles south of the city of San Diego, and eight miles north of the Mexican Border. Existing project. Construction of 3.2 miles of channel improvements along the Sweetwater River from Interstate 805 to San Diego Bay, in combination with State Route 54 and Interstate 5 construction; and construction of two railroad bridges and 188 acres of preservation and mitigation land. Local cooperation. San Diego County signed 221 Agreement 33-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 in December 1984. Operations during fiscal year. The required environmental monitoring is being performed and expected to continue for the next year. 35. TROPICANA AND FLAMINGO WASHES, NV Location. The project area is located west of and through urbanized Las Vegas community along both Tropicana and Flamingo Washes in southern Nevada. Existing project. The recommended plan will provide urban flood reduction, erosion control and wildlife enhancement for portions of Las Vegas and the surrounding areas to the west and southwest, including the rapidly developing alluvial fan immediately west of Las Vegas. The plan recommends construction of four debris basins, two detention basins, modifications to two existing detention basins, 28 miles of channels connecting these project elements, 43 miles of lateral collectors, environmental mitigation, and recreation facilities. The estimated cost (October 1998) for the existing project is $284,000,000 (includes $42,400,000 cash contribution and $33,100,000 other costs). Local cooperation. The Clark County Regional Flood Control District and the Department of Public Works are the local sponsors for flood control. The Clark County Recreation Department is the potential local sponsor for the recreation feature. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed on February 7, 1995. Operations during fiscal year. Completed construction of Tropicana Dam; awarded construction of Blue Diamond Beltway Channel (Segment 7A), Lower Blue Diamond Channel, and Tropicana Outlet Channel; completed design work for Flamingo Diversion Channel, Upper Red Rock Channel, and Blue Diamond Detention Basin; and continued design of debris basins and channels. 36. TUCSON DIVERSION CHANNEL (RECREATION DEVELOPMENT), AZ Location. The Tucson Detention Basin and Diversion Channel is in southeast Arizona. The project area initiates within the basin and proceeds approximately five miles downstream, until it meets Interstate 19. Existing project. The recreational development consists of a bicycle and hiking trail; four rest areas at the basin's inlet and outlet areas, near the intersection of Park Ave. and Ajo Way, across the street from Wakefield Middle School and near Interstate 19, where the project ends; four channel under crossing areas at Ajo Way (near the basin's outlet), Interstate 10; Kino Parkway; and Benson Highway; a restroom facility and five to seven car parking area located near the end of the project area; lighting at rest areas; benches; pedestrian bridges; and landscaping. The flood control channel maintains a 30-40 foot width, with a average 30 foot right-of-way on each side of the channel. The trail system is primarily located along the north bank of the channel. Local cooperation. Pima County is the local sponsor. Operations during fiscal year. Construction contract was completed on September 25, 1998 of above mentioned features. 37. WHITLOW RANCH DAM, QUEEN CREEK, AZ Location. Fifty miles southeast of Phoenix, AZ in Pinal County, on Queen Creek, Arizona a tributary of Gila River, about 10 miles west of Superior, Arizona. Existing project. For details see page 33-10 of Annual Report 1981. Project element earthfill Dam, circular conduit outlet works and reservoir. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. A Periodic Inspection was conducted. Routine operations and maintenance were performed. Project condition is good. 38. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of 24 completed local flood control projects consisting of the following: 375 miles of channels, six dams, and appurtenances, and 23 debris basins. Inspections costs for Fiscal Year 1998 were $460,573. 39. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with Section VII, Flood Control Act of 1944, studies of reservoir operations for flood control were conducted; and preparation of regulations for the use of storage allocated for flood control was continued. The flood control structures were Hoover, Twitchell, and Tat Momolikot Dams. Scheduling costs for Fiscal Year 1998 were $120,000. 33-10 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization 40. PROJECTS NOT SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107 of the 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act, Public Law 645, 86th Congress, as Amended: Federal cost for Section 107, Coordination Account was $1,740. Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as Amended: Federal cost for Section 205 was $179,775 of which $169,167 was used for studies and $10,608 for Coordination Account. See Table 33-J for list of projects. Emergency Streambank Protection Activities Pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as Amended Federal cost for Section 14 was $290,578. Snagging and Clearing Navigable Streams and Tributaries in interest of Flood Control, Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83d Congress. No snagging and clearing activities for 1998. Modifications to Structures and Operations of Constructed Corps Projects to Improve the Quality of the Environment, Pursuant to Section 1135 of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act, Public Law 662, 99th Congress, as Amended. Federal cost for Section 1135, was $690,046. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Pursuant to Section 206 of Water Resources Development Act of 1986 Federal cost for Section 206 was $28,951 of which $4,391 was Coordination Account and $24,560 was Preliminary Restoration Plans. 41. EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACTIVITIES - FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES Emergency Flood Control Activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). A. Disaster: The Los Angeles District Emergency Operations Center (EOC) deployed 16 personnel to San Juan, Puerto Rico for hurricane disaster relief following hurricane George and hurricane Mitch in 1998. Support was provided during a 4 month period from October through January , of which approximately 3 months was assisting the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) with their roofing mission. B. Operational Program Areas: Fiscal Year cost for disaster preparedness was $684,623; emergency operations cost was $3,332,055; post flood response operations cost was $334,943; repair and restoration of damaged Federal flood control works cost was $1,100,000 and $1,800,000 for non-Federal flood control works; inspection of non-Federal flood control works cost was $300,000. C. Emergency Work in Support of Other Federal Agencies. Support work was performed for Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) following hurricanes George and Mitch at a cost of $1,756,141. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 42. SURVEYS Total fiscal year costs were $8,055,604 of which $1,067,093 was for navigation studies; $2,496,701 was for flood damage prevention studies; $4,161,799 was for special studies; $106,225 for review of completed projects; $66,946 was for Miscellaneous Activities (includes $47,709 for special investigations; $1,437 for FERC licensing activities; $13,380 for Interagency Water Resources Development; $1,669 for National Estuary Studies; $2,749 for North American Waterfowl Management Plan); and $156,840 for Coordination Studies with other Agencies and Non-Federal Interests, ($153,941 was for Planning Assistance to States - $643 for Arizona, and $153,298 for California). 43. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs totaling $310,864 were associated with the following tasks under the Flood Plain Management Services Program, FPMS Unit $37,148; Technical Services $81,917; Quick Responses $9,947; and Special Studies $176,523 and $5,329 for hydrologic studies. 44. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 33-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Fiscal year expenditures were $419,125 of which $410,504 was for projects not yet authorized for construction and $8,621 was for projects fully authorized. 44A RIO SALADO, PHOENIX REACH, AZ Location. The project area is located in the city of Phoenix, Arizona, along 7 miles of the Salt River. Existing project. Two sites have been identified with a Federal interest in environmental restoration involving riparian habitat restoration, water quality improvement and recreation that is incidental or complimentary to the primary project purpose. The first site is 1.5 miles on Indian Bend Wash, from McKellips Road downstream to the confluence with the Salt River in Tempe; the second site is located along 7 miles of the Salt River, from the Interstate Highway 10 Bridge to 19th Avenue in Phoenix. Local cooperation. The city of Phoenix and the Corps of Engineers executed the Preconstruction Engineering Design Agreement on July 31, 1998. Operations during fiscal year. The preconstruction engineering and design phase was initiated in August 1998. 44B RIO SALADO, TEMPE REACH, AZ Location. The project area is located along 1.5 miles on Indian Bend Wash, from McKellips Road downstream to confluence with Salt River in Tempe, Arizona. Existing project. There is a Federal interest in environmental restoration involving riparian habitat restoration, water quality improvement and recreation that is incidental or complimentary to the primary project purpose. Local cooperation. The local sponsor, the city of Tempe supports the project. Operations during fiscal year. Initiated Design Agreement negotiations with the city of Tempe. 44C. TUCSON DRAINAGE AREA, AZ Location. Located along Tucson Arroyo/Arroyo Chico Watershed, within the Tucson city limits in Arizona. Existing project. Both the reconnaissance report and the feasibility study identified the Tucson Arroyo/Arroyo Chico watershed area (approx. 11.4 sq. Miles) as the major drainage channel within downtown Tucson. The recommended plan has two main features consisting of: two detention basin complexes - one on Arroyo Chico in the headwaters of the drainage area (referred to as Randolph Golf Course Detention Basin Complex), and one on Tucson Arroyo/Arroyo Chico in the approximate center of the watershed (referred to as Park Avenue Detention Basin Complex). The Randolph Golf Course Detention Basin Complex was completed by the local sponsor in May of 1996 using Section 104 credit consideration. Local cooperation. Local sponsor, Pima County Department of Transportation and Flood Control District, expressed support for environmental restoration component in letter dated May 1996. Operations during fiscal year. Final feasibility report completed January 1998. Design agreement approved by Head Quarters and received by sponsor August 1998. 33-12 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 30 Sep 98 1. Channel Island, CA 2. Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbor, CA Model Study: 3. Marina del Rey, CA 4. Morro Bay Harbor, CA 5. Newport Bay Harbor, CA 6. Oceanside. Harbor, CA 7. Oceanside Harbor Sand By- Pass, CA 8. Port Hueneme, CA 9. Port of Long Beach, CA 10. Redondo Beach (King Harbor) 11. San Diego Harbor, CA Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. 1,902,000 1,912,234 364,000 730,806 2,391,000 2,166,477 156, 000 106,602 4,406,858 4,431,939 1,300,000 100,995 794,000 827,115 12,000 12,014 0 261,162 595,000 599,077 4,730,000 1,361,946 155,000 148,337 129 122,000 TABLE 33-A 1,921,00 1,875,350 350,000 314,735 637,000 1,001,053 154,000 205,602 1,174,000 1,177,225 124,000 1,300,305 1,671,000 1,672,065 141,000 140,676 (238,000) (122,393) 325,000 317,659 721,000 655,221 70,000 68,032 506,000 452,584 0 0 646,000 33-13 1,699,00 1,650,614 15,000,000 14,858,465 1,569,000 1,104,714 162,000 136,734 -30,000 -44,286 0 9,052 970,000 973,031 1,654,000 1,654,991 -62 -62 531,000 400,307 0 766,469 0 0 244,000 245,149 0 0 142,000 2,836,000 2,705,897 34,975,000 34,621,306 1,664,000 1,690,138 162,000 177,125 1,081,000 1,065,448 0 25,539 3,437,000 3,361,325 605,000 332,009 00 1,014,000 1,138,823 -1,400,000 1,343,660 0 0 4,135,000 583,169 200,000 101,201 37,000 42,810,120 42,585,908 54,415,000" 53,627,729 13,709,842 13,147,957 9,401,887 9,391,094 11,350,774 11,307,033 1,524,000 1,474,261 21,604,471 21,516,379 2,969,700 2,696,245 3,734,9382/ 284,938 12,892,787 12,877,487 23,356,900 23,059,200 1,481,165 1,472,534 4,885,000 1' 1,280,902 5,435,343 5,336,496 5,507,191 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 98 TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 30 Sep 98 12. San Diego River and Mission Bay, CA 13. Santa Barbara Harbor, CA 14. Santa Monica Breakwater, CA 15. Surfside, Sunset and Newport Beach, CA 16. Ventura Harbor (Ventura Marina), CA 17. Alamo Dam, AZ 18. Clifton, AZ 19. Hansen Dam, LACDA, CA (Recreation) 20. Lake Elsinore, CA 21. Los Angeles County Drainage Area, CA Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost New Work: Approp Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 116,966 0 177,491 0 4,488 2,102,000 2,136,128 (26,000) 143,488 70,000 6,243 1,000,000 369,830 0 190,370 1,283,000 1,277,364 916,000 824,529 4,141,000 5,413,097 0 12,557 183,000 337,421 2,896,000 2,394,814 650,458 1,542,000 401,124 0 1,558,000 1,543,576 40,000 61,678 155,000 213,235 (508,000) 187,378 (10,000) 1,807 2,050,000 1,968,562 887,000 968,906 2,463,000 2,616,117 0 3,488 16,437 4,741,000 4,949,317 139,732 -400,000 913,897 19,000 16,820 1,318,000 1,239,512 10,000 19,316 0 5,521 5,804,000 5,505,594 0 -6,633 2,095,000 1,973,632 1,328,000 857,414 604,000 651,722 0 0 (500,000) 0 14,424,800 14,392,147 30,482 0 14,014 0 0 1,235,000 1,160,838 00 1,409,000 19,503 0 184,886 7,000 0 6,391,000 5,729,589 974,000 1,389,276 2,160,000 824,611 982,000 330,598 68,000 59,026 16.941,000 16,246,471 5,491,761 7,884,345 7,863,209 3,580,689 3,577,546 21,972,774 21,797,855 941,000 105,829 1,634,0002/ 244,502 21,409,100 21,264,304 5,287,000 5,273,367 39,092,332 38,220,163 16,711,859 16,573,455 14,060,000 4' 12,719,356 2,234,000 1,582,598 5,068,000 5,059,026 46,556,000 5/ 45,400,856 33-14 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 30 Sep 98 Maint: Approp. 2,645,400 4,186,000 5,612,000 7,219,500 92,277,202 Cost 2,747,049 3,823,778 4,791,637 6,817,931 90, 354,289 22. Los Angeles Maint. River, Sepulveda Approp. 165,000 0 0 0 400,000 to Arroyo Seco, CA Cost 149,439 64,438 0 28,835 365,430 (Recreation) 23. Mojave River Maint: Dam, Mojave Approp. 254,000 109,000 181,000 191,000 5,803,536 River Basin, CA Cost 250,243 99,670 189,578 187,992 5,783,705 24. Nogales Wash, New Work: AZ Approp. 205,000 68,000 -66,800 214,000 592,200w- Cost 107,420 57,072 42,509 72,279 449,095 25. Norco Bluffs, New Work: CA Approp. 0 0 180,000 1,000,000 1,180,000"' Cost 0 0 78,176 101,739 179,915 26. Painted Rock, Maint: AZ (Gila Rvr) Approp. 950,000 4,272,000 1,494,000 2,063,000 26,140,183 Cost 1,146,834 4,293,862 913,109 1,547,326 24,931,973 27. Pine & Mathews Maint: Canyons Dam, Approp. 254,000 187,000 106,000 92,000 2,511,329 Colo River Cost 253,642 180,857 111,531 91,424 2,505,135 28. Rillito River, New Work: AZ Approp. 8,081,000 6,088,000 6000 757,000 22,957,0007/ Cost 6,318,272 10,055,413 1,004,659 587,266 22,655,849 29. Santa Ana River New Work: Mainstem, CA Approp. 60,978,000 67,439,000 65,346,000 70,916,000 590,360,000W Cost 78,209,809 71,093,106 64,794,411 66,607,143 569,826,038 30. Santa Ana River Maint: Basin OC, CA Approp. 1,938,400 2,272,000 2,461,000 3,067,000 47,148,494 Cost 1,961,607 2,303,725 2,287,217 2,802,171 46,616,783 31. Santa Paula New Work: Creek, CA Approp. 800,000 1,209,000 1,923,000 4,457,000 16,086,020 Cost 839,848 776,660 1,802,238 4,379,650 15,444,927 32. San Luis Rey New Work: River, CA Approp. 6,270,000 1,000,000 -1,000,000 2,371,000 57,071,000 Cost 6,376,513 334,752 354,927 2,348,438 54,115,632 33. Sepulveda Dam, Maint: CA, (Recreation) Approp. 60,558 - 1,961,000 0 17,460,940 Cost 122,456 1,975,587 1,319,802 840,786 15,081,787 34. Sweetwater New Work: River Basin, CA Approp. (18,000) 2,400,000 -100,000 0 36,363,503 Cost 139,346 2,517,011 -73,499 22,330 36,362,563 35. Tropicana/ New Work: 33-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 98 TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 30 Sep 98 Flamingo, NV Approp 5,892,000 3,668,000 9,709,061 17,783,000 46,811,000 Cost 3,410,635 8,816,175 9,531,822 14,578,276 43,294,784 36. Tucson Diver- Maint: sion Channel, AZ Approp. 2,850,000 0 0 0 3,050,000 (Recreation) Cost 343,088 321,128 396,738 1,745,123 2,945,359 37. Whitlow Ranch Maint: Dam, Queen Approp. 107,000 93,000 65,000 135,000 1,820,850 Creek, AZ Cost 107,622 92,188 63,606 120,083 1,801,768 PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 44A Rio Salado, Phoenix New Work: Reach, AZ Approp. 0 0 0 330,000 330,000 Cost 0 0 0 221,962 221,962 44B Rio Salado, Tempe New Work: Reach, AZ Approp. 0 0 0 49,000 49,000 Cost 0 0 0 28,221 28,221 44C Tucson Drainage New Work: Area, AZ Approp. 0 0 30,000 20,000 50,000 Cost 0 0 0 30,264 30,264 FOOTNOTES: 1/ Excludes non-Federal funds and costs; includes PED appropriation of $4,090,000 and cost of $3,833,223. 2/ Excludes non-Federal sponsors funds $1,913,000 and cost of $1,685,758; includes PED Work Allowance of $647,000 and cost of $647,000. 3/ Excludes non-Federal funds and costs; includes PED appropriation of $750,000 and costs of $739,000.0. 4/ Excludes non-Federal funds $376,000 and cost of $367,712; includes PED appropriation $1,600,000 and cost of $1,600,000. 5/ Includes PED Work Allowance of $9,650,000 and cost of $9,648,146. Excludes non-Federal Work Allowance of $6,191,000 and cost of $4,299,586. 6/ Excludes non-Federal funds and costs. Excludes PED appropriation and cost due to portions of the project reclassified to "Deferred" and "inactive" categories. 7/ Excludes non-Federal funds and cost; includes PED appropriation $3,825,000 and cost of $3,825,000 8/ Excludes non-Federal funds and costs; includes PED appropriation $25,643,000 and costs of $25,643,000. 9/ Excludes non-Federal funds and costs; includes PED appropriation $225,000 and costs of $224,756. 10/Excludes non-Federal funds and costs; includes PED appropriation $180,000 and costs of $78,176. 33-16 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY98 TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. Sep. 3,1954 CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA Harbor for light-draft vessels and shore protection works. June 3, 1988 LOS ANGELES AND LONG BEACH HARBORS, CA A breakwater 8,500 feet long, east of Point Fermin. June 25,1896 Extend said breakwater to shore, making a total length of 11,152 feet from Point Fermin. July 25, 1912 Dredge Los Angeles outer harbor west of entrance channel. Aug. 8, 1917 For silt-diversion works. Sep. 22, 1922 Triangular area approach to Los Angeles inner harbor entrance channel. Mar. 3, 1925 Dredge Los Angeles Harbor main channel and entrance 35 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide; dredge inner harbor turning basin 35 feet deep; and reclamation of Reservation Point. July 3, 1930 A detached breakwater 12,500 feet long in prolongation of existing breakwater (authorized by act of 1896). Widen fairway on east side of entrance to Los Angeles inner harbor; dredge a channel 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide in Cerritos channel from U.S. station 406 to Long Beach turning basin; entrance channel to Long Beach Harbor 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide; and maintenance of the Long Beach breakwater south of outer end pier A. This act provides that in no case shall dredging be done within 50 feet of established pierhead lines of existing piers and wharves. Aug. 30, 1935 Dredge 1,000-foot wide entrance channel to Los Angeles outer harbor to 40-foot depth and a turning basin 3,500 feet long and 1,500 feet wide to same depth; and enlarge entrance to inner harbor by dredging to 35-foot depth a triangular area at its junction with turning basin. 33-17 H.Doc.362,83d Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc.18, 55th Cong., Ist sess. H.Doc. 969, 60th Cong., Ist sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.8, 62d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.9, 64th Cong.,2d sess. H.Doc. 1013, 66th Cong.,3d sess. H. Doc.349, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.33, 71st Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc.130, 71st Con.,2d sess. S.Committee print, 74th Cong., 1st sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY98 TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 17, 1940 Dredge to a depth of 40 feet area A and B adjacent to 40-footdepth entrance channel; construct and maintain a rubble mound breakwater of composite type 21,000 feet long in eastward therefrom to Belmont pier; maintenance dredging of A and B, and at mouth of Los Angeles River diversion channel; all subject to such modifications as in discretion of the Chief of Engineers may be advisable to meet requirements of the Navy. Sep. 3, 1954 Dredge to a depth of 35 feet in West Basin as a modification of existing project. This act provides that the Secretary of the Army is authorized to reimburse local interests for work they have done upon this project prior to July 1, 1953, at actual cost to local interests so far as same shall be approved by Chief of Engineers and found to have been done in accordance with the project hereby adopted and that such reimbursement shall be subject to appropriations applicable thereto or funds available therefore and shall not take precedence over other pending projects of higher priority for harbor improvements; and that such payments shall not exceed $500,000. July 14, 1960 Dredge to a depth of 35 feet in West Basin as a modification of existing project. Oct. 22, 1976 Dredge Los Angeles Harbor entrance channel 45 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and about 5,500 feet long; Los Angeles channel 45 feet deep, 750 feet wide, and about 12,500 feet long; inner harbor turning basin 45 feet deep, 1,350 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long; East Basin channel 45 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long; West Basin 45 feet deep, from 350 to 1,350 feet wide, and about 3,800 feet long; and East Basin 45 feet deep, from 400 to 950 feet wide, and about 2,000 feet long. This act provides that no dredging shall be done within 125 feet of established pierhead lines, wharves, or other structures. Oct. 17, 1986 Deepen the entry channel to the Los Angeles Harbor and Long Beach Harbor to 70 feet and 76 feet respectively, including the creation of 800 acres of land from the project. Nov. 17, 1988 If non-Federal interest carry out any work associated with such project which is later recommended by the Chief of Engineers and approved by the Secretary, the Secretary may credit such non-Federal interest an amount equal to the Federal share of the cost of such work, without interest. H.Doc.843, 76th Cong., 3d sess H. Doc. 161, 83d Cong., 1st Sess H.Doc.401,86th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.401,86th Cong., 2d sess. WRDA 86, Sec 201. WRDA 88, Sec 4 33-18 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY98 TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Nov. 28, 1990 Section 4(d) of WRDA 1988 (102 Stat. 4015) is amended by WRDA 90, Sec 102 inserting after "approved by the Secretary" in the first sentence the following: "or which is carried out after approval of the final report by the Secretary and which is determined by the Secretary to be compatible with the project". Sep. 25, 1996 The sewer outfall relocated by the Port of Los Angeles at a cost WRDA 96 Sec 307 of approximately $12,000,000 shall be considered to be a relocation. The cost of such relocation shall be credited as a payment provided by the non-Federal interest. Sep. 3, 1954 MARINA DEL REY, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CA H.Doc.389, 83d Cong., 2d sess. Harbor for light-draft vessels. Sep. 28, 1994 Determine advisable modifications in interest of navigation, Sec 216, Flood Control Act of 1970, supp. hurricane and storm damage reduction, environmental restoration by House Resolution Sep. 28, 1994. and disposal of contaminated sediments from the entrance channel at Marina Del Rey Harbor Mar. 2, 1945 MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA Adoption and improvement of existing entrance channel to bay, a H.Doc.283, 77th Cong., 1st sess. breakwater extending south by west from Morro Rock, and bay channels and basins at locations and of dimensions substantially as shown on the Navy Department map on file in the Office of the Chief of Engineers. May 22, 1991 NEWPORT BAY HARBOR (& REVIEW), CA Maintenance and improvement of main and inner channels. Doc.PL99-662 (WRDA 1986, Sec 841). R&H Acts 1937 & 1945 S. Doc. 138 78th Cong. Initiate feasibility phase studies re-environmental preservation benefits associated with modification of existing Federal project WRDA 1986, Sec.. 841 (PL-9962) to extend channels into the Upper Newport Bay. Oct. 27, 1965 OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA Maintenance of general navigation features of Del Mar Boat H.Doc.76, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Basin and of Oceanside Harbor. Oct 27, 1990 Navigation and storm damage reductin, repair, operate, and PL 101-640 (WRDA 1990) WRDA 1992. maintain the extension of south jetty. PL 102-580 May 22, 1991 OCEANSIDE HARBOR SAND BY-PASS SYSTEM, CA EWDA Act 1992 Maintenance of general navigation features of Del Mar boat Basin and of Oceanside Harbor. Aug.13, 1968 PORT HUENEME, CA Adoption and maintenance of existing harbor for deep-draft 2d sess. vessells; dredged central basin to 35 feet deep, and extend southernmost interior channel. PORT OF LONG BEACH, CA Sep 25, 1996 Navigation project. WRDA 1996, Sec 101(d)4. The project for navigation, Port of Long Beach (Deepening), CA; Report of the chief of Engineers, dated July 26, 1996, at a total cost of $37,288,000 with an estimated Federal cost of $14,318,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $22,970,000. 33-19 3. 5. 6. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY98 TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 10. 11. Mar 21, 1950 REDONDO BEACH HARBOR (KING HARBOR), CA Maintain harbor dredging and breakwaters. Oct 17, 1986 Construct and maintain breakwater to height of 22 feet. Oct 1988 Mar 3, 1875 SAN DIEGO HARBOR, CA Diversion dike. Sep 19, 1890 Jetty on Zuniga Shoal. Jun 25, 1910 Dredge channel through outer bar 30 feet deep and 600 feet wide, and a channel through middle ground to 30 feet deep. Mar 4, 1913 Dredge channel through outer bar 570 feet wide and 35 feet deep, and a channel through middle ground 32 feet deep. Jul 27, 1916 Widen approach (area B) to San Diego municipal pier by dredging area C (north of area B). Aug 8, 1917 Dredging area A (south of area B). Aug 8, 1917 Dredge 35-foot channel through middle ground. Sep 22, 1922 Dredging areas D and E. Mar. 3, 1925 Widen approach (area C) to San Diego municipal pier 1 by dredging an portion of area F (north of area C). 33-20 R&H Act 1950 (H.Doc 303 81st Cong.) PL99-662 (WRDA 86, Sec 809), Amended in WRDA 1988. Authorized by Chief of Engineer. Annual Report. 1873; p. 1-142 H.Ex.Doc.177, 50th Cong., Ist sess. (Annual Report, 1888; p.2114). H.Doc.961, 60th Cong., 1st session. H.Doc.1309, 62d Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc.648, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.8, 64th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.1000, 66th Cong., 3d sess. River and Harbors Committee Doc.2, 68th Cong., 1st sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY98 TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul 3, 1930 Deepen to 40 feet channel through outer bar; along south and north banks, main channel; dredge turning basin, widen area H, and dredge a channel to National City and Chula Vista. Aug 30, 1935 Widen bay channel to 2,200 feet with depth of 35 feet from the vicinity of Whalers Bight in lower bay to Naval Air Station opposite turning basin. Aug 26, 1937 Dredging areas Q.Q-1, M, N, and O. Oct 17, 1940 Dredge a seaplane basin (area S.) of about 3,000 acres, 10 feet deep, and fill an area of about 110 acres adjacent to southern end of basin. Mar 2, 1945 Dredge triangular approaches to 26-and 35-foot anchorages, area M. Aug, 13, 1968 Deepen and extend existing navigation channels, delete uncompleted parts, and extend maintenance. Jul 24, 1946 SAN DIEGO RIVER AND MISSION BAY, CA Modification of existing flood control project for San Diego River, CA, to include a multiple-purpose project for flood control on San Diego River and small-boat navigation on Mission Bay. Aug 30, 1935 SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA Maintenance dredging present depths into harbor formed by breakwater constructed by local interests. Mar 2, 1945 Permits maintenance by means of a fixed sand-intercepting plant to be provided and operated by and at expense of local interests. United States to contribute to operating expense an amount not to exceed $30,000 annually, whenever funds are allotted therefore; funds thus contributed to be reduced by actual cost of harbor maintenance if and when intercepting plant has been installed. S.Doc.81, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.223, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.89, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.844, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc.390, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.365, 90th Cong., 2d sess. 1 H.Doc.760, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 1 S.Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.348, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Project for navigation; report of the Chief of Engineers, dated April 26, 1994 Oct. 23, 1962 Modification of existing project. H.Doc.518, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 1 33-21 12. 13. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY98 TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Dec 31, 1970 Dredging and maintenance by United States. Sep 25, 1996 Complete plans and specs. Sep 25, 1996 SANTA MONICA BREAKWATER, CA Hurricane and storm damage reduction act. The project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, Santa Monica Breakwater, Santa Monica, CA; Report of the chief of Engineers, dated June 7, 1996, at a total cost of $6,440,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $4,220,000 and an estimated non- Federal cost of $2,220,000. Oct 23, 1962 SURFSIDE, SUNSET & NEWPORT BEACH, CA Beach erosion. Protective measures that comprise a protective and feeder beach at Surfside, and on offshore breakwater at Newport Beach to provide and impounding area from which sand would be dredged and returned periodically to the feeder beach, all substantially in accordance with the plan of the DE. Aug 13, 1968 VENTURA HARBOR (VENTURA MARINA), CA Adoption and maintenance of existing general navigation features of harbor, excluding interior basins; construction of an offshore breakwater; dredging a sand trap in lieu of breakwater; repairing existing north and middle jetties; and construction of recreational fishing facilities on jetty crests. Nov 17, 1988 The Harbor commonly known as Ventura Marina, located in Ventura County, CA, and adopted and authorized by section 101 of Public Law 90-483, shall hereafter be known and designated as "Ventura Harbor". Dec 22, 1944 ALAMO LAKE, BILL WILLIAMS RIVER, AZ Multiple-purpose dam and reservoir. Jan 23, 1990 CLIFTON, AZ Reauthorized the flood control project at a total cost of $21,100,000. Sep. 25, 1996 Flood control. Oct, 2, 1992 HANSEN DAM, CA Develop water conservation on existing spreading grounds. None. Sec 101., H Doc 1160, Water Resources Project Authorization WRDA 1996, Sec 101(d)7. Sec 101 of R&H Act 1992. H.Doc.356, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 100-676. H.Doc.625, 78th Cong., 2d sess. WRDA 1996 Sec 301. WRDA 1990, Sec 3a modified WRDA 1986. PL 102-377 Energy & Water Appropriation Act, 1993. 33-22 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY98 TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 20. Feb 24, 1948 LAKE ELSINORE, CA Sec 205, 1948 Flood Flood Control in downtown area as well as around perimeter of Control Act (1). lake. 21. Jun 22, 1936 LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA None. Reservoirs and flood channels for flood control and related purposes at an estimated construction cost not to exceed $70 million. May 15, 1992 Added flood channels on Ballona Creek and tributaries to project. None. Jun 28, 1936 Provision of lands, easements, and rights-of-way and relocations H. Doc. 838, 76th Cong., 3d Sess. by Federal Government instead of by local interests. (Resultant Additional cost to the United States, $12,541,000). Aug 18, 1937 Project extended to include additional flood None. control reservoirs, flood control channels, and debris basins for flood control and related purposes. Also authorized to be appropriated $25 million for further accomplishment of plan. Dec 22, 1944 Authorized to be appropriated an additional $25 million for None. prosecution of comprehensive plan approved in Flood Control Act of Aug. 18, 1941. Jul 24, 1946 Authorized to be appropriated an additional $25 million for None. further prosecution of comprehensive plan. May 17, 1950 Rio Hondo channel improvement, Whittier Narrows Reservoir to None. Los Angeles River (in lieu of enlarging channel and bridges on San Gabriel River Downstream from reservoir). Also authorized to be appropriated an additional $40 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Sep 3, 1954 Authorized to be appropriated an additional $12,500,000 for None. further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Jul 3, 1958 Authorized to be appropriated an additional $44 million for None further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Jul. 14, 1960 Authorized to be appropriated an additional $32 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Oct. 23, 1962 Authorized to be appropriated an additional None 33-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY98 TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents $3,700,000 for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Dec.30, 1963 Authorized to be appropriated an additional $30 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Nov 17, 1986 Authorized modifications of Hansen Dam by removing and selling dredged material to facilitate flood control, recreation, and water conservation. Nov 17, 1988 The Secretary may convey to the city of South El Monte, CA, approximately 7.778 acres of real property, together with improvements thereon, located within the Whittier Narrows Flood Control Basin. Oct 30, 1990 The project for flood control, Los Angeles County Drainage Area, California, at a total cost of $327,000,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $163,500,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $163,500,000, is authorized to be prosecuted by the Secretary in accordance with a final report of the Chief of Engineers and with such modifications as are recommended by the Secretary. No construction on the project may be initiated until such a report of the Chief of Engineers is issued and approved by the Secretary. Nov. 28, 1990 Authorized project for flood control. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Report. Jul 14, 1960 LOS ANGELES RIVER (SEPULVEDA DAM TO ARROYO SECO), CA Recreation development for bicycle/hiking trails along the upper Los Angeles River May 17, 1950 MOJAVE RIVER DAM, MOJAVE RIVER BASIN, CA Dam and reservoir, and an earthfill dike. Evaluate opportunities for water conservation, environmental restoration, and enhanced flood control, along the Mojave River and Tributaries downstream of the dam. Jun 20, 1989 NOGALES WASH, AZ Flood Control Protection and Flood Warning System. Oct. 27, 1990 Flood warning gauges in Mexico Sep 25, 1996 NORCO BLUFFS, CA The project for bluff stabilization, Norco Bluffs, Riverside county, California, at a total cost of $8,600,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $6,450,000 and an estimated non- Federal cost of $2,150,000. July 6, 1949 PAINTED ROCK DAM (GILA RIVER), GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ Dam and flood control basin. None. None None. None WRDA 1990, Sec 101(b)(PL 101-640), Project Subject to Favorable Report of the chief of Engineers. PL 101-640, WRDA 1990 Flood Control Act 1936, PL 77387 1941, PL 103-126 H.Doc.164, 86th Cong., 1st sess. HR 2479, Mar. 7, 1996 Energy and Water Development Appropriatin bill 1990., H.Doc2696, 101st Cong, 1st session WRDA 1990, Sec 101 (4) WRDA 96, Sec 101(b) H.Doc.331, 81st Cong., 1st sess. 33-24 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY98 TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct 27, 1965 PHOENIX, AZ., AND VICINITY (INCLUDING NEW RIVER), GILA RIVER BASIN Detention basins, diversion channels, and channel improvements. Cover Arizona canal Diversion channel, east of Central Avenue of Phoenix, property line of Arizona Biltmore on Phoenix, and east of 32d Street to the Cudia city Wash spillway in Paradise 28. H.Doc.216, 89th Cong., 1st sess Energy and Water Development appropriation Act 1990 WRDA 1986, PL99-662, Sec 601(a). Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1988 WRDA 1986, PL 99-662, Energy and Water Appropriation Act 1988, and WRDA. H.Doc 94-594,94th Cong.,2d sess. H. Doc. 688, 75th cong., 3d sess. H.Doc.688, 75th Cong., 3d sess None H. Doc. 534, 78th Cong., 2d sess.1 June 20, 1989 RILLITO RIVER, AZ Flood damage protection. Oct. 17, 1986 Bank erosions control and flood protection. Sep 26, 1997 Section 114 of Public Law 101-101, the Energy & Water Development Appropriations Act, 1990, is amended by striking "total cost of $19,000,000" and inserting in lieu thereof, "total cost of $40,000,000." May 20, 1991 SANTA ANA RIVER MAINSTEM, CA Flood control along 75 miles reach of Santa Ana River, recreation development, and mitigation and preservation. Nov 28, 1990 The project for flood control, Santa Ana Mainstem, including Santiago Creek, CA, is modified to authorize the Secretary to develop recreational trails and facilities on lands between Seven Oaks Dam and PradoDam, including flood plain management areas. Jun 22, 1936 SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN( AND ORANGE COUNTY), CA Reservoirs and flood channels for flood control and related pruposes for protection of metropolitan area of Orange County, at an estimated construction cost not to exceed $13 million. Jun 28, 1938 San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel portion of improvement. Authorized to be appropriated $6,500,000 for initiation and partial accomplishment of plans for those creeks. 1936, providing that local interests pay for relocations, lands, easements, and rights-of-way. (Estimated resultant additional cost to United States. $3,500,000). Aug 18, 1941 Authorized to be appropriated an additional $2,500,000 for prosecution of projects approved in above flood control acts. Dec 22, 1944 Authorized to be appropriated an additional $10 million for prosecution of projects adopted in above-mentioned flood control acts, including projects on Lytle and Cajon Creeks for local flood protection at San Bernardino and Colton, CA. Jul 3, 1958 Authorized to be appropriated an additional $8 million for prosecution of projects approved in abovementioned flood control acts. 33-25 27. None. 29. 30. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY98 TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 31. 32. Oct 22, 1976 SANTA PAULA CREEK, CA Flood control improvements and prevention. Authorize for flood control. Dec 17, 1970 SAN LUIS REY RIVER, SAN LUIS REY RIVER BASIN, CA Channel and levee, and beautification features. Sep. 25, 1996 The project for flood control of the San Luis Rey river, CA, authorized pursuant to section 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5; 79 stat 1073-1074) is modified to authorize the secretary to construct the project substantially in accordance with the report of the corps of Engineers dated may 23, 1996 at a total cost of $81,600,000 (Fed $61,100,000, non-Fed $20,500,000) Oct 22, 1976 SEPULVEDA DAM, CA RECREATION FACILITIES Jun 11, 1964 SWEETWATER RIVER BASIN, CA Channel improvement, as part of a combined flood control and highway project. Oct 31, 1992 TROPICANA AND FLAMINGO WASHES, NV Flood reduction, erosion control, and wildlife enhancement. Sep. 25, 1996 Authorizes project to demonstrate the potential advantages and effectiveness of non-Federal implementation of flood control projects, and provides that the Secretary shall enter into an agreement, pursuant to Section 211 of WRDA 96, with the non- Federal interests for development of that project. Proposed agreement would allow the non-Federal sponsor to construct any discrete segment of the authorized project as approved by the Army corps of Engineers. Oct 22, 1976 TUCSON DIVERSION CHANNEL (RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT), AZ The project for recreational development along the Tucson Diversion channel. Jul 24, 1946 WHITLOW RANCH DAM, QUEEN CREEK, GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ Dam and flood control basins. 33-26 1948 Flood Control Act, H.Doc.443,80th Cong., 1st sess S.Doc.91-106,91st Cong., 2d sess Title III Project Related Provisions Sec 301 Project Modifications FC ACT 1936, (Amended 1937, 1941, 1950) and Fed Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 FC ACT 1965.,H.Doc. 240 and 309., 88th Cong., 2d sess WRDA 1992, Sec 101 (13) WRDA 1996, Sec 211 (f)(5), Public Law 104-303 Flood Control Act 1936 (amended 1937) 1941, 1950 and Fed Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. H.Doc.220, 80th Cong., 1st sess. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 1. 2. 3. Contains latest published map. Date approved by Chief of Engineers under provisions of section 205. Public Law 80-858, as amended. Final date of approval by House of Senate Public Works Committees resolution under provisions of Section 201, Public Law 89-298. LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to 30 Sep 1998 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance Dana Point, Harbor, CA Completed 1984 $ 4,737,550' 555,147' Harbor office at Morro Bay, CA3 Los Angeles and Long Beach Active 53,627,729 13,147,957 Harbors, San Pedro Bay, CA3 Newport Bay Harbor, CA3 Inactive and 1982 796,8974 2,696,2455 Active (mod) Port San Luis, CA Completed and 1984 1,426,0506 1,042,3527 Active (mod) Redondo Beach Harbor Completed and 1984 4,766,8989 5,237,31310 (King Harbor), CA8 Active (mod) Sunset Harbor (Bolsa Chica Bay), CA3 1. Excludes $4,777,000 required contributed funds and Coast Guard costs. 2. Includes $45,147 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. 3. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986, subject to favorable report. 4. Public Works Administration funds. Excludes $796,897 required contributed funds and $1,100 preauthorization costs. 5. Includes $137,622 for reconnaissance and condition survey costs since FY1958. Excludes $7,000 other contributed funds. 6. Includes $568,417 for new work prior to modification by 1965 River and Harbor Act. Excludes Coast Guard costs. Includes $104,031 expended in FY1987. 7. Includes $54,715 for maintenance for project prior to modification by 1965, River and Harbor Act, and $18,958 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. Includes $90,130 expended in FY87. 8. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986. 9. Excludes Coast Guard costs. 10. Includes $20,517 for reconnaissance and condition survey costs since FY58. Includes $293,167 expended in FY87. 33-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY98 TABLE 33-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to 30 Sep 1998 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Anaheim Bay Harbor Orange Completed 1967 $ 89,119 County, CA' Bird Rock area, La Jolla Completed 1967 25,8813 San Diego County, CA2 Coast of California, Point Mugu, Completed 1972 1,253,5944 to San Pedro breakwater, CA Doheny Beach State Park (Doheny Completed 1968 578,7175 State Beach), CA Imperial Beach, CA Active 1986 2,631,4726 Las Tunas Beach, San Diego County, CA Active 1976 107,484 Ocean Beach, San Diego County, CA7 Completed 1960 7,912 Oceanside, San Diego County, CA Completed 1982 4,367,442s San Diego (Sunset Cliffs), CA Active 1979 365,0009 San Gabriel River to Newport Bay Active 1985 9,722,10010 (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Orange County, CA Surfside-Sunset-Newport, CA Active 1997 Ventura-Pierpont area, CA Completed (part) 1969 715,819" and Deferred (part) 1. The project authorized by the Act of Congress of October 23, 1962, H.Doc.602, 87th Cong., 2d sess., in lieu of part of the original Anaheim Bay Harbor project is covered under San Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Orange County, CA 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 103, Public Law 87-874. 3. Excludes 475,614 required contributed funds. 4. Excludes $1,238,418 required contributed funds. 5. Excludes $431,260 required contributed funds. 6. Excludes $919,437 required contributed funds; $66,124 other contributed funds; and Coast Guard costs. 7. Plant in service. 8. Excludes $604,817 other contributed funds. 9. Excludes $180,438 required contributed funds. 10. Excludes $4,626,638 for required contributed funds. Includes $10,772 expended in FY87. 11. Excludes $1117,406 other contributed funds for beach-nourishment betterments and $618,949 required contributed funds. 33-28 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 98 TABLE 33-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to 30 Sep 1998 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Allenville, AZ' City Creek levee, San Bernardino County, CA' Clifton, San Francisco River, AZ Coyote and Berryessa Creeks CA Gila River Basin, AZ: Camelsback Dam (Gila River) Gila and Salt Rivers levee and channel improvements Indian Bend Wash Lower Gila River levee and channel improvements (Gila River and tributaries downstream from Painted Rock Dam) Middle Gila River channel improvements, upper end of Safford Valley to Buttes damsite (Camelsback damsite to Salt River) Pinal Creek channel improvements (Globe) Santa Rosa Wash (Tat Momolikot Dam and Lake St. Clair) Tucson diversion channel Goleta, CA, and vicinity Hansen Dam, Los Angeles County ' drainage area, CA (mod) Holbrook levee Little Colorado River, Colorado River Basin, AZ Little Colorado River at Holbrook ' Needles, San Bernardino Co. Nogales Wash and Tributaries, AZ Oceanside Harbor, CA Oro Grande Wash channel improvements, Mojave River Basin, CA' Phoenix, AZ and Vicinity (Gila River) Quail Wash levee, Joshua Tree, San Bernardino Co. CA Ridgecrest, Kern County, CA' Rose Creek channel improvements, San Diego, CA' San Diego River (Mission Valley), San Diego River Basin, CA Santa Ana River Basin, CA: Devil, East Twin, and Warm Creeks channel improvements and Lytle Creek levee Mill Creek levees Riverside levees San Jacinto River levee and Bautista Creek channel Santa Clara River levee improvement, Santa Clara River Basin, CA Completed Completed Active Active Deferred Active (part) and Deferred (part) Completed Inactive Active Deferred Completed Completed Active Completed Completed Active Active Completed Completed Completed Terminated Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 33-29 1984 1988 1989 1963 1966 1985 1975 1970 1968 1982 1986 1982 1950 1973 1989 1989 1970 $ 3,000,0002 400,0002 12,510,000 56,300,000 73,2014 31,809,294 s 2,413,051 402,867 121,5094 10,218,900 6,922,6336 500,000 335,000 1,000,0008 11,100,000 5,100,000 1,000,0009 212,745 1973 1972 1978 1962 1961 1959 1985 1961 195,194 982,43210 1,708,437 7,753,93711 617,89012 2,104,478 9,258,20713 2,126,672 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 98 TABLE 33-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to 30 Sep 1998 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Santa Maria Valley levees, Santa Completed 1984 10,079,92714 Maria River Basin, CA Santa Paula Creek channel and Active 1983 4,790,17315 debris basins (including Mud Creek), Santa Clara River Basin, CA Sespe Creek at Fillmore, Ventura Completed 1984 4,000,00016 County, CA' South Fork of the Santa Clara Active 1985 632,158 River, Santa Clarita Valley, CA' Telegraph Canyon Creek, Chula Active 1985 844,732"7 Vista, CA' Tijuana River Basin, CA Completed 1979 1,703,03118 Ventura Harbor, CA Active 1990 6,455,000 Ventura River Basin, CA: Stewart Canyon debris basin and Completed 1964 939,908' 9 channel Ventura River levee Completed 1950 1,349,63820 Whitewater River, CA: Banning levee-San Gorgonio Completed 1966 97,868 River, Riverside County' Chino Canyon improvements, Palm Completed 1973 819,87821 Springs' Tahchevah Creek detention basin Completed 1967 1,420,55222 and channel improvements Tahquitz Creek Inactive 1974 1,063,600 Winslow (tributaries of Little Completed (part) 1973 1,831,300 Colorado River), Little Colorado and Deferred (part) River Basin, AZ 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended. 2. Excludes $187,965 required contributed funds. 3. Excludes $371,058 other contributed funds. 4. Advance planning only. 5. Excludes $304,720 required contributed funds and $3,130,762 other contributed funds. Includes $31,071 expanded 6. Includes $1,158,006 Code 710 funds since FY77. Excludes $749,058 required contributed funds and $394,364 funds. 7. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986. 8. Excludes $619,912 required contributed funds and $91,160 other contributed funds. 9. Excludes $514,806 required contributed funds and $176,295 other contributed funds. 10. Excludes $251,000 required contributed funds and $154,733 other contributed funds. 11. Excludes $200,000 required contributed funds and $1,641,668 other contributed funds. 12. Excludes $35,830 other contributed funds. 13. Excludes $712,000 other contributed funds. 14. Excludes $106,364 other contributed funds. Includes $74 expended in FY87. 15. Excludes non-Federal costs of $295,000 for local cooperation items for required and $49,458 16. Excludes $559,525 required contributed other funds. 17. Includes $3,846 expended in FY87. Excludes $104,941 other contributed funds. 18. International Boundary & Water Commission funds funds. 19. Excludes $179,148 other contributed funds. 20. Includes $6,000 Code 710 funds since FY77. Excludes $17,006 other contributed funds. 21. Excludes $8,718 required contributed funds $53,470 other contributed funds. 22. Excludes $74,718 required contributed funds. 33-30 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Hodges Dam, San Dieguito River Basin, CA Las Vegas Wash tributaries, Colorado River Basin, NV Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), CA: Aliso Creek Dam San Juan Dam Trabuco Dam Villa Park Dam Sierra Madre Wash channel, Los Angeles County drainage area, CA Lower Mission Creek Santa Barbara, CA University Wash and Spring Brook, Riverside, CA San diego River, Mission Valley, CA Harbor Office, Morro Bay, CA Sunset Harbor, CA 1958 1964 1950 1978 Sec. 12, Public Law 93-251 1977 Sec. 12, Public Law 93,251 1986 Sec. 1002 Public Law 99-662 1986 Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 1986 Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 1978 Sec. 12, Public Law 93-251 1986 Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 1988 Sec. 1001(A), Public Law 99-662 1986 Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 1978 Sec 001 (B)(2), Public Law 99-662 1991 Sec. 1001(A), Public Law 99-662 1991 Sec. 1001(A), Public Law 99-662 1986 1988 1975 1978 33-31 295,191 67,361 1,641,144 213,313 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-H RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Project Date Channel Islands Harbor Dec. 1996 Dana Point Harbor Jun. 1997 Marina Del Rey, CA Aug. 1997 Oceanside Harbor Mar. 1997 Port Hueneme, CA Jul. 1997 San Diego Harbor, CA Sep. 1997 San Diego River-Mission Bay, CA Oct. 1996 Santa Barbara Harbor, CA Jan. 1997 Ventura Harbor, CA Dec. 1996 33-32 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-I INSPECTION OF COMPLETED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS/FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Project Date Rose Creek Channel Improvements, San Diego, CA San Diego River Channel and Levees, San Diego River Basin, CA 33-33 July 1987 July 1987 TABLE 33-J FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 80-858, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Section 40 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Stage Cost (Federal) Mission Zanja Redlands, CA Feasibility* $ 9,950 Lake Elsinore Riverside County, CA Completed 59,027 Mohave County flood Warning, AZ Plans and sspecifications 899 Arizona State flood Warning, AZ Feasibility** 30,039 Bolsa Chica Creek, Garden Grove, CA Feasibility 9,653 City of Laguna Beach, CA Feasibility 58,175 San Jose Creek Near Hollister, CA Feasibility 712 Little Tijuana River, San Diego County, CA Feasibility 712 Section 205 Coordination Account 10.608 $179,775 *No further Federal interest **Negative status 33-34 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT * This district comprises the Klamath River Basin in southern Oregon and portions of northern and western California consisting of drainage basins tributary to the Pacific Ocean from the Oregon- California State line on the north to Cape San Martin, CA, on the south except for basins tributary to the San Francisco Bay system which lie east of the Benecia-Martinez Bridge. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Crescent City Harbor, CA............... 34-1 2. Humboldt Harbor, CA..................34-2 3. Oakland Harbor, CA.................. .34-3 4. Richmond Harbor (Deepening), CA.......34-4 5. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) ....................... 34-5 6. Sonoma Baylands Wetlands Demonstration Project, CA ............. 34-6 7. San Francisco Bay and Delta Model, CA..34-6 8. San Francisco Bay Long Term Management Strategy (LTMS), CA ...... 34-7 9. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ............................. 34-8 10. Navigation Work under Special Authorization ................... ..... 34-8 11. Beach Erosion Control Work under Special Authorization........................34-8 Flood Control 12. Corte Madera Creek, CA............... .34-8 13. Klamath River, Klamath Glen Levee, CA. 34-9 14. Petaluma River, Petaluma, CA..........34-10 15. Russian River Basin, including Dry Creek (Warm Springs Lake) and Lake Mendocino (Coyote Valley Dam), CA ..... 34-10 16. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .................... 34-11 17. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization ....................... 34-12 Navigation 1. CRESCENT CITY HARBOR, CA Location. The project is located in Crescent City, Del Norte County approximately 350 miles north of San Francisco and 17 miles south of the Oregon border. Existing project. There are two existing Federally maintained navigation channels at Crescent City Harbor. The Entrance Channel begins at the outer breakwater and is -15 feet Page 18. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations................ 34-12 19. Miscellaneous Work under Special Authorization .................... . 34-12 General Investigations 20. Surveys........................ 34-12 21. Collection and Study of Basic Data ..... 34-12 22. Preconstruction Engineering andDesign......................... 34-12 Tables Table 34-A Table 34-B Table 34-C Table 34-D Table 34-E Table 34-F Table 34-G Table 34-H Table 34-I Table 34-J Cost and Financial Statement ................. 34-15 Authorizing Legislation ................ 34-20 Other Authorized Navigation Projects......... 34-24 Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects....... 34-24 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects........... 34-25 Russian River Basin, CA: Estimated Cost for New Work .34-26 Russian River Basin, CA: Project Features and Estimated Costs.............34-26 MLLW (Mean Lower Low Water), 2,600 feet long, and 320 to 200 feet wide. The Entrance Channel connects to the Inner Harbor Channel, which is 1,500 feet long and extends from the Entrance Channel along the lee side of the inner breakwater. The Inner Harbor Channel is authorized at -20 feet MLLW and since 1993 maintained at -15 feet MLLW due to economic justification. The proposed project would extend the 1965 authorized project approximately 350 feet from the Inner Harbor Channel to reach the entrance of the Small Boat Basin, which was constructed in 1974. 34-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 The new channel would vary in width from 140 feet to 210 feet, extend 1,200 feet in length with a channel depth of -14 feet MLLW plus one foot of advanced maintenance. An estimated 38,000 cubic yards of dredged material would be disposed at an upland site. Present estimated total cost for the project is $1,680,000 of which $1,344,000 is Federal cost and $336,000 is non-Federal cost. Local cooperation. The local sponsor is the Crescent City Harbor District. The Project Cooperation Agreement is scheduled to be signed in July 1999 and would satisfy the requirements of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended, PL 99-662. The agreement includes the following requirements: 1) provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; 2) pay 10 percent of the costs of construction; and 3) pay an additional 10 percent plus interest of the project costs allocated to general navigation features within a period of 30 years following completion of construction. Terminal facilities. The Harbor contains a commercial small boat basin with 240 permanent berths and temporary moorings for approximately 20 vessels, a 527 slip recreational mooring facility, two fish processing plants with docks, a main dock, a marine repair facility, a U.S. Coast Guard dock, and other auxiliary commercial and recreational facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction is scheduled to begin in October 1999. Maintenance: Operations and maintenance includes engineering and design for fall dredging on a 5 year dredging cycle. FY 98 maintenance dredging was conducted by a contract hydraulic pipeline dredge with disposal of 33,000 cubic yards on Whaler Island at a cost of $181,000. Approximately 18,000 cubic years was not dredged due to a lack of a suitable disposal site. 2. HUMBOLDT HARBOR, CA Location. The project is located in Humboldt Bay, about 280 miles north of San Francisco. Existing project. Adopted by Acts of March 3, 1881, July 5, 1884, August 5, 1886, July 3, 1892, March 3, 1889, June 25, 1910, July 3, 1930, August 30, 1935, August 26, 1937, July 16, 1952, and August 1968. The project consists of: 1) a Bar and Entrance Channel 40 feet deep, taped from a width of 1,600 feet at seaward mile 0.9 to 500 feet at seaward mile 0.2 and then 500 feet wide to mile 0.8; 2) a North Bay Channel 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide between mile 0.75 and mile 4.29; 3) an Outer Eureka Channel 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide between mile 4.29 and mile 5.0; 4) an Inner Eureka Channel between mile 5.0 and mile 6.30 which is 26 feet deep and 400 feet wide; 5) a Samoa Channel 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide between mile 4.29 and mile 5.84; 6) a Turning Basin beyond mile 5.84 at the upper end of the Samoa Channel which is 35 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide by 1,000 feet long; 7) an Anchorage Area 35 feet and 1,200 feet wide by 1,200 feet long in the North Bay between the Entrance Channel and Gunther Island (the anchorage area is not maintained); 8) a Fields Landing Channel 26 feet deep and 300 feet wide and a turning basin at mile 3.16 which is 600 feet wide and 800 feet long; and 9) Arcata Channel located in the extreme North Bay (18 feet deep and 150 feet wide) is no longer used for commercial navigation and has not been maintained since 1931. The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 authorized deepening the Bar and Entrance Channel to a depth of -48 MLLW; deepening the North Bay Channel, Samoa Channel, and Samoa Turning Basin to a depth of -38 feet MLLW; widening the north side of the Entrance Channel an additional 200 to 275 feet; moving the southern edge of the Entrance Channel away from the South Jetty and to the north by 100 feet; and widening and realigning the entrance to the Samoa Turning Basin. Present estimated total cost for the project is $16,800,000 of which $10,820,000 is Federal cost (includes $200,000 Coast Guard cost) and $5,980,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $1,680,000 non-Federal reimbursements). Local cooperation. The local sponsor is the Humboldt Bay Harbor, Recreation and Conservation District. The Project Cooperation Agreement is scheduled to be signed in March 1999 and would satisfy the requirements of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended, PL 99-662. The agreement includes the following requirements: 1) provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; 2) pay 25 percent of the costs of construction; and 3) pay an additional 10 percent plus interest of the project costs allocated to deep draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction. 34-2 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT Terminal facilities. The harbor serves six deep water breakbulk terminals with storage space for 120,000,000 FBM of logs/lumber and 100,000 MT of woodchips and warehouse space for 1,000,000 FBM of lumber and 51,000 MT of woodpulp and particle board. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction is scheduled to begin in May 1999. Maintenance: Normal O&M dredging was superseded by emergency dredging. Emergency: On March 4, 1998, an "Emergency Declaration" was issued by the District Engineer to remove an extremely hazardous shoal deposited at the Harbor entrance by the effects of El Nino. The Corps' hopper dredges Yaquina and Essayons mobilized from their homeport of Portland, Oregon and immediately commenced emergency dredging operations upon arrival. Due to adverse weather and severe sea conditions, dredging productivity was limited because work could only be accomplished during the flood tide cycle...ebb tides were unworkable and too dangerous. A combined total of 681,896 cubic yards were removed at a cost of $2,062,890. This emergency action re-opened the channel to safe navigation and minimized regional economic and local commerce impacts. This outstanding mission achievement exceeded all expectations and the sponsor, maritime community, and congressional representative were very appreciative and grateful. All dredged material was deposited in the permanently designated, Government-furnished, Humboldt Open Ocean Disposal Site (HOODS). 3. OAKLAND HARBOR, CA Location. Oakland Harbor is located in the City of Oakland, California, on the eastern shore of central San Francisco Bay immediately south of San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge. Existing project. Adopted by Acts of June 23, 1874, June 25, 1910, September 22, 1922, January 21, 1927, April 28, 1928, July 3, 1930, March 2, 1945 and October 23, 1962. The project was completed February 1975, except for deepening the tidal canal to 35 feet from Fortman Basin to Park Street, and to 25 feet above Park Street which was deauthorized November 1977. Reconstruction of the Fruitvale Avenue Highway Bridge was completed in December 1973 and turned over to local interests for operation and maintenance. Project consists of entrance channel to Oakland Outer Harbor, 35 feet deep from deep water in San Francisco Bay and 800 feet wide across the shoal southeast of Yerba Buena Island, narrowing to 600 feet at Oakland Mole; thence, a channel and turning basin 35 feet deep and from 600 to 950 feet wide in outer harbor to the Army Base. Project also provides entrance channel to Oakland Inner Harbor, 38 feet deep and 600 feet wide to Howard Terminal and 35 feet deep to west end of Government Island, with additional widening to within 75 feet of the pierhead line in front of Grove and Market Street (formerly municipal) piers and along the south side of the channel from Harrison Street eastward to harbor line point 119 in Brooklyn Basin; a channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide through Brooklyn Basin; for a triangular area 35 feet deep about 2,700 feet long and maximum width of 300 feet at western end of Brooklyn Basin; a channel along north side of Brooklyn Basin which is 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide for 1,300 feet, thence 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide for 3,700 feet to a turning basin at east end of Brooklyn Basin which is 35 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 1,200 feet long; a channel in the tidal canal 35 feet deep and 275 feet wide from Brooklyn Basin to Park Street, thence 18 feet deep to San Leandro Bay; a total channel length of 8-1/2 miles from San Francisco Bay to San Leandro Bay. Project also includes parallel rubblemound jetties at entrance to inner harbor, north jetty 9,500 feet long and south jetty 12,000 feet long; three highway bridges across the tidal canal, two of which (at Park Street and High Street) have been replaced by local interests and the Fruitvale Avenue Bridge constructed by Federal Government has been transferred to Alameda County. The railroad bridge has been transferred to the County for operation and maintenance. The Federal Government will reimburse the County for the cost of operating and maintaining the railroad bridge. Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986 authorized deepening the 4 mile Inner and 3.4 mile Outer Harbors channels to 42 feet deep and widening the entrance channel to 1,000 feet; relocation of the Outer Harbor turning basin 3,000 feet westward; and widening the turning basin to 1,800 feet and constructing a 1,200 foot turning basin in the Inner Harbor, 42 feet deep, at mile 3.7. Section 301 of WRDA 1996 combined the Oakland Outer Harbor and Inner Harbor into one project and designated as the Oakland Harbor, California project. Present estimated total cost for the authorized improvements is $119,116,000 of which 34-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 $83,586,000 is Federal cost (includes $125,000 Coast Guard cost) and $35,530,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $12,000,000 non-Federal reimbursements). Under WRDA 1986, the Bar Channel and Inner Harbor were deepened in 1992 to 38 feet deep up to Howard Terminal as a separable element of the authorized 42-foot deep project. Local cooperation. The Port of Oakland signed a Project Cooperation Agreement on December 9, 1994 satisfying the requirements of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662. The agreement includes the following requirements: (1) provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; (2) pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction; and (3) pay additional 10 percent plus interests of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction. Deepening to 42' MLLW was completed in July 1998. The Port of Oakland completed a feasibility study to deepen Oakland Harbor to -50' MLLW at 100% Port cost under the authority of Section 203 of WRDA 86. The estimated project cost is $254 million with an average annual navigation benefit of $178 million. Port is seeking project authorization in WRDA 99. Terminal facilities. The port occupies 19 miles on the mainland shore of San Francisco Bay. There are 550 acres of marine terminal facilities, 28 deepwater berths and 25 container cranes, including 5 of the post Panamax type. On-dock covered storage space exceeds 600,000 square feet. Three major railroads, Santa Fe, Southern Pacific and Union Pacific serve the port. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of the 42' MLLW was awarded in December 1994. Deepening at the Inner and Outer Harbors to 42' MLLW started in May 1995. 1,713,000 cubic yards of dredged material was placed at Sonoma Baylands to restore 348 acres of wetlands; 3,570,000 cubic yards were dredged from the Outer & Inner Harbor and disposed of into the Ocean Disposal site, SF-DODS; 1,030,000 cubic yards were dredged and placed for the construction of the Galbraith Golf course site. Maintenance: Operations and maintenance of Fruitvale Avenue R.R. Bridge including engineering and design by hired labor, cost $206,000; operations and maintenance of Miller-Sweeney Highway Bridge, cost $95,900; and operations and maintenance of Oakland Inner 107,000 cubic yards removed at a cost of $566,356 and the Outer Harbor 305,000 cubic yards removed at a cost of $1,330,000. 4. RICHMOND HARBOR, CA Location. Richmond Harbor is located in central San Francisco Bay, in Contra Costa County in the City of Richmond. Existing project. The existing navigation channel extends from deep water in San Francisco Bay into the Port of Richmond. The Southampton Shoal Channel and Long Wharf Maneuvering Area, at the entrance to the harbor channels are maintained to -45 feet MLLW. The Entrance Channel, Potrero Reach Channel, Potrero Sharp Turn, Inner Harbor and about half of the Santa Fe Channel, to -38 feet and the remainder of the Santa Fe Channel from the Lauritzen Channel confluence to -30 feet. The width of the navigation channel is 600 feet for most of its length to Point Richmond with one maneuvering area: in front of the Long Wharf. At Potrero Reach, the 500 foot width flares to about 600 feet at Point Potrero with a turn at the point, 1,200 feet wide and 38 feet deep. Thence, the channel continues into the inner harbor at a width of 850 feet in a northerly direction to the entrance of the Santa Fe Channel. The Santa Fe Channel extends northwesterly at a width of 200 feet into the upper basin terminus. A turning basin is provided at Point Richmond, and a rubble-mound training wall extending 10,000 feet westerly from Brooks Island is also provided in the Potrero Reach. For details, see page 1977 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1646 of Annual Report for 1938. Improvements consisting of a construction plan involving four and one-half miles of channel between Richmond Long Wharf and the Santa Fe Channel. The project deepened the existing 35-foot channels to 38 feet, and provided a turning basin of 1,200 feet near Point Potrero. Approximately 2,200,000 cubic yards of sediment were dredged and transported to aquatic and upland disposal sites. Construction was completed in August 1998. The estimated cost $40,000,000 of which $28,300,000 is Federal cost (includes $130,000 Coast Guard costs) and $11,700,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $1,310,000 non-Federal reimbursements). 34-4 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT The existing project was authorized on October 27, 1965. Previous projects were authorized by Acts adopted in 1917, 1930, 1935, 1938, 1945 and 1954. The proposed improvements are authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662. Local cooperation. In accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the local sponsor must comply with the following requirements: (1) pay 10 percent of the costs to 20 feet below mean lower low water and 25 percent of costs between 20 and 45 feet below mean lower low water and (2) reimburse an additional 10 percent with interest of the costs allocated to general navigation facility of the project within a period of 30 years following completion of construction; and (3) provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocation and dredged material disposal areas necessary for the projects. The value of lands, easements, rights-of-way and dredge disposal areas can be credited toward the payment required under item (2) above. Terminal activities. The Port of Richmond encompasses nine privately-owned terminals and seven terminals owned by the Port. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction project completed in May 1998. Maintenance: Operations and maintenance of Richmond Outer Harbor including engineering and design and U.S. Hopper dredge Essayons. Essayons removed 265,800 cubic yards of shoal material from the Outer Harbor, cost $1,241,000. 5. SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CA (JOHN F. BALDWIN AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNELS) Location. The location is the John F. Baldwin Ship Channel. Navigation channels extending from entrance to San Francisco Bay to Suisun Bay near Martinez through San Francisco, Marin, Contra Costa, and Solano Counties. (See National Ocean Service Charts 18649, 18654 and 18656 for respective areas.) Existing project. Project provides for modification of the existing San Francisco Harbor, Richmond Harbor, San Pablo Bay and Suisun Bay Channels to the vicinity of Pt.. Avon to provide depths of 55 feet for San Francisco Bar Channel, 45 feet (currently 35 feet) for main internal bay channels upstream to the vicinity of Pt.. Avon; enlargement and deepening to 45 feet (currently 35 feet) of maneuvering areas adjacent to major petroleum refinery terminals along the channel route. San Francisco Harbor Main Channel was completed in February 1974. The South Hampton Shoal Channel and the Richmond Long Wharf maneuvering area were completed in December 1986. For the approved cost estimate (1996) of Federal cost (Corps), see Sacramento District Annual Report. Existing project was adopted by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 208, 89th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Estimated volume of dredged material is 9 million cubic yards. A new alternative initially proposed by the sponsor would create a pipeline terminal north of the Richmond/San Rafael Bridge. Dredging of less than 50k CY and a greatly shortened navigation channel 2 miles long by 600 feet wide by 45-foot deep would eliminate or minimize the serious issues facing project construction including salinity intrusion, disposal site selection, air quality, and endangered species preservation. In February 1999, this sponsor withdrew support for a pipeline terminal. Local cooperation. See Sacramento District Annual Report. The local sponsor, Contra Costa County, supports the project. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 30, revised 1991, No. 31, revised 1991, and No. 32, revised 1986, titled respectively: "The Ports of San Francisco, Redwood City, and Humboldt Bay, Calif."; "The Ports of Oakland, Alameda, Richmond, and the Ports on Carquinez Strait, Calif."; and "The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg, and Antioch, Calif." Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and will be adequate for future commerce upon completion of new terminal facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Continued planning engineering and design activities. 34-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 6. SONOMA BAYLANDS WETLANDS DEMONSTRATION PROJECT, CA Location. The Sonoma Baylands site is located in Sonoma County, CA, approximately 25 miles north of San Francisco near the mouth of the Petaluma River, on the northern shoreline of San Pablo Bay. Existing project. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1992. The project includes restoration of tidal wetlands on 348 acres of diked lands, including construction of 11,645 feet of replacement levee around the landward periphery of the site, fifteen internal peninsulas for wave protection, three weirs for the discharge of dredged material supernatant, and modification of three existing high voltage electrical towers. Project included placement of 207,000 cubic yards of maintenance-dredged material from the Petaluma River navigation channel in a pilot project area and placement of 1.7 million cubic yards of suitable dredged material from the Oakland Harbor deepening projects on the remainder of the site. Placement of material was completed on November 6, 1995. The project cost is $8,900,000, of which $6,675,000 is Federal cost and $2,225,000 is non-Federal cost. Oakland deepening to -42' MLLW was completed in July 1998. Local cooperation. The California State Coastal Conservancy signed a Project Cooperation Agreement on May 6, 1994 satisfying the requirements of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992, PL 102-580 and signed an amendment on December 9, 1994 to include the placement of Oakland Harbor dredged material. The local sponsor must comply with the following requirements: (1) provide lands, easement, and right of ways; (2) modify or relocate utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges) and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project; (pay 25 percent of the total project cost in accordance with Section 106 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992. The local sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Terminal facilities. N/A Operations during fiscal year. The project was restored to tidal action on October 25, 1996. Monitoring of the project is continuing. Project was turned over to California Coastal Conservancy in August 1998 for operation, maintenance, repair, replacement, and rehabilitation of the functional portion of the project. 7. SAN FRANCISCO BAY-DELTA MODEL STRUCTURE, CA Location. The model, including a Class A regional visitor center, is located in Sausalito, CA, adjacent to San Francisco Bay about two miles north of the Golden Gate Bridge. Existing project. The San Francisco Bay/Delta Model, which covers 17 miles of the Pacific Ocean beyond the Golden Gate, all of San Francisco Bay proper, San Pablo Bay, Suisun Bay, and all of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta east of Suisun Bay to the cities of Sacramento on the northeast and Stockton and Tracy on the south, was constructed in a rehabilitated warehouse at Sausalito, CA, as a part of the San Francisco Bay and Tributaries, CA, Study authorized by the River and Harbor Act of May 17, 1950 (PL 81- 516, Section 110). The model was authorized as an operation and maintenance project in the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (PL 93-251, Section 8). The model successfully reproduces to the proper scale the rise and fall of the tide, flow and currents of water, salinity intrusion, and trends in disposition of sediments. It is a useful tool to examine forces existing in the bay and estuarine system and to predict results of proposed changes. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations and maintenance of the model continues. Historical summary. Original model construction was initiated 1956 and completed 1957. The addition of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta to the original model was initiated 1966 and completed 1969. Annual visitation to the model averages between 100,000 to 150,000 people. The central exhibits were completed in December 1981. Extensive exhibit upgrade for the Visitor Center and development of Cooperative Association completed September 30, 1989. The Cooperative 34-6 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT Association provides financial and educational support to visitor center programming. An active volunteer program exists at the Visitor Center providing approximately 80 man-days of effort monthly. Continued testing of proposals affecting the environmental quality of the region including, but not limited to: salinity intrusion, dispersion of pollutants, water quality, improvements for navigation, dredging, bay fill, physical structures, and other shoreline changes. Total cost of regional visitor exhibits and model as of September 30, 1998, was $32,699,124 of which $13,165,290 was for the regional visitor center, $1,383,324 for exhibits, and $18,150,508 for maintenance. 8. SAN FRANCISCO BAY LONG TERM MANAGEMENT STRATEGY (LTMS), CA Location. The San Francisco Bay Long-Term Management Strategy (LTMS) for dredged material disposal covers deep and shallow draft navigation channels of the San Francisco Bay region including Central San Francisco Bay, South Bay, San Pablo Bay and Suisun Bay environs. Existing project. The San Francisco Bay region has an annual disposal requirement of approximately 6 million cubic yards (mcy) to maintain navigation channels. The Bay also has a one-time new civil works requirement of approximately 16 mcy for the Oakland Harbor, Richmond Harbor, and John F. Baldwin Phase III ship channel. In January 1990, the Army Corps of Engineers, the Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, the San Francisco Bay Water Quality Control Board and the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission convened with approximately thirty interested agencies and organizations with concerns regarding dredged material disposal in San Francisco Bay. These four agencies have the responsibility for regulation of the waters of the US and California for disposal of dredged material. The four agencies and the concerned navigation interests formed the LTMS to develop technically feasible, economically prudent, and environmentally acceptable long range solutions to the dredging and disposal needs for the San Francisco Bay region over the next fifty years. In determining acceptable dredged material disposal locations, the LTMS is evaluating a broad array of potential ocean, in-Bay and non-aquatic beneficial uses disposal alternatives. Local cooperation. Pursuant to their regulatory responsibilities, the Division Commander of the South Pacific Division, Corps of Engineers; the Regional Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX; the Chair of the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Board and the Chair of the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission agreed to jointly undertake the development and implementation of a Long Term Management Strategy (LTMS) for dredging and disposal of dredged materials from the region. Based on the outputs from the LTMS, the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the Bay Conservation and Development Commission will consider modifications to the dredging elements of their respective Basin and Bay Plans for San Francisco Bay. Regulatory Streamlining: Besides identifying implementable disposal options, the LTMS will: (1) develop coordinated regional disposal policies between federal and state agencies; (2) provide a local decision-making framework for dredging and disposal projects; (3) streamline existing permit and testing procedures; and (4) provide a long term site monitoring apparatus and feedback mechanism. Operations during fiscal year. In 1994, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designated a deep ocean disposal site. In 1996, the Corps, EPA, and the State of California implemented a joint agency Dredged Material Management Office (DMMO) for dredging permit processing. The Final LTMS EIS is scheduled to be released in October 1998. The EIS will identify Alternative 3 as the preferred alternative that would limit future disposal to 20% in the San Francisco Bay, 40% in the ocean, and 40% for upland beneficial reuse. Final comments and response to comments as well as a Draft Record of Decision (ROD) will be submitted to Corps Headquarters for review in March 1999. The Division Commander and EPA's Regional Administrator will sign the Final ROD in May 1999. The signing of the ROD will initiate implementation for Federal agencies, followed by the State in FY 00 after amending the San Francisco Bay and Basin Plans. 34-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 The implementation efforts will be finalized through the development of a management plan detailing the policies and procedures for implementing the selected alternative. Adoption of the management plan will require amending the Bay and Basin Plans. In general, the programmatic EIS requires future project-by-project analysis for "practicability" in terms of fiscal and environmental impacts that would then be assembled as a regional composite EIS. 9. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Reconnaissance and condition surveys of channels to be dredged in years other than Fiscal Year 1998 and jetty structures were conducted on the following projects: Bodega Bay; Crescent City Harbor; Islais Creek; Monterey Harbor; Moss Landing Harbor; Oakland Harbor; Pillar Point; Pinole Shoal; Redwood City; Richmond Harbor; San Leandro Marina; San Rafael; Santa Cruz; and Sausalito Canal; all in California. Fiscal year costs were $607,381. 10. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $3,171 for Section 107 Coordination Account. Mitigation of shore damages activities pursuant to Section 111, Public Law 90-483 (preauthorization). None. 11. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $60,586 for East Cliff Drive, Santa Cruz, CA. Flood Control 12. CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA Location. Creek and tributaries drain an area of 28 squire miles in Marin County, CA, and flow into west side of San Francisco Bay about 9 miles north of Golden Gate. Existing Project. Provided for about 11 miles of channel improvements, including realignment, enlargement, levees, riprap, rectangular concrete sections, interior drainage facilities, bridge relocations, and debris removal on Corte Madera Creek and lower reaches of its tributaries, and a continuous channel rights-of-way to deep water in San Francisco Bay reserved to assure channel outlet in the event of future tideland reclamation. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 modified existing project to direct construction of Unit 4 from Lagunitas Road Bridge to Sir Francis Drake Boulevard, and to include construction of flood proofing measures as necessary to individual properties and other necessary structural measures in vicinity of Lagunitas Road Bridge to insure proper functioning of completed portions of authorized project. Portion of project upstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard previously classified inactive was modified on November 17, 1986 to eliminate any channel modification. Current project has 3 miles of channel enlargement and levees, about 1.8 miles of rectangular concrete channel improvements, and 450,000 cubic yards of redredging on lower Corte Madera Creek. Present estimated total cost for new work in Unit 4 and previously constructed features is $37,100,000 of which $21,900,000 is Federal cost and $15,200,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $1,740,000 to be contributed by local interests). Local Cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way, including suitable areas for disposal of waste material, modify or relocate all bridges and utilities necessary for construction and maintenance; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate the project after completion in accordance with the regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army, and prevent encroachment on flood channels that would result in decreasing the effectiveness of project for flood control; adjust all claims regarding water rights that might be affected by the project; 34-8 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT and contribute in cash 1.5 percent of Federal construction cost of Ross Valley units 1-4 and tidal areas. Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District previously furnished resolution of local assurances dated March 29, 1966, March 28, 1967, August 15, 1967, and July 8, 1969, and Marin County Board of Supervisors reaffirmed by letter dated September 28, 1978. Project was authorized by the State of California by 1965 Statute, Chapter 1388. Board of Supervisors of Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District furnished assurances of willingness and ability to meet requirements for portion of project below Sir Francis Drake Boulevard. On December 13, 1983, Marin County Board of Supervisors reconfirmed assurances of local cooperation because a Superior Court judgment ordered that county to take all steps required by law to complete channel downstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard (Unit 4) and maintain entire project as agreed. A Local Cooperation Agreement for redredging the lower reach of Corte Madera Creek was executed on June 29, 1985. Marin County also provided support for Ross Valley Unit 4 by resolution on March 24, 1987 and by the resolution on September 13, 1988. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The flood control project has been built in separate units. The current project focuses on the design and construction of unit 4 with indirect benefits to units 2 and 3. Unit 4 includes a natural flood control channel and a sedimentation basin located at the town of Ross. The project study is scheduled for approval on February 17, 1999. The General Reevaluation Report (GRR) and Supplemental EIS/EIR will be initated. As long as the originally authorized project remains the recommended project, the 1966 authorized cost sharing and financing requirements will be applicable. A community-based Design Advisory Committee has been created with representatives from Ross, Kentfield, Corte Madera, and Larkspur to provide community input on the conceptual plan. The conceptual plan is based on the Marin County Board of Supervisors' Design Guidelines for a consensus plan which was approved in 1996. The GRR will be developed in two phases. Phase I will refine the conceptual plan and determine if the project benefits exceed the costs. Phase II will complete the GRR and environmental documentation. Phase I is scheduled for completion in May 1999, and Phase II in September 2000. Construction of Unit 4 and attendant feature in the downstream units is being determined. Historical summary. Project responsibility was transferred to Sacramento District on April 1, 1982 and back to the San Francisco District on October 1, 1996. Resolution 96-26 was passed on February 1, 1996 by the Marin County Board of Supervisors in support of a 40-year project. Project is about 77 percent complete considering the portion being held in abeyance upstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard. Work remaining: Design construction of the remaining 3,000 feet of channel downstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard and Ross Creek. The portion of Corte Madera Creek upstream of intersection of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard and Corte Madera Creek in Ross, near the city of San Anselmo, was classified as "inactive" on July 11, 1984, due to lack of local support. A Local Cooperation Agreement for redredging lower reach of Corte Madera Creek was executed June 29, 1985. Construction on Lower Corte Madera Creek Channel was completed and transferred to Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation Disrict by letter of May 28, 1987, San Francisco District monitors maintenance and operation of the project. The project was transferred from Sacramento District in October 1996. Design process began in the San Francisco District to complete Unit 4. 13. KLAMATH RIVER, KLAMATH GLEN LEVEE, CA Location. The Klamath Glen Levee, part of the Klamath River Federal Flood Control Project, is located in the community of Klamath Glen, California, at the confluence of Terwer Creek and the Klamath River. Existing project. The levee system consists of about 8,900 feet of riveted levee (15-40 feet in height) and interior drainage facilities. Terwer Creek portion of the levee is immediately adjacent to the town of Klamath Glen and protects about 170 homes and a pumping structure. 34-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Local cooperation. The local sponsor (Del Norte County, California), desires cost sharing in accordance with the original agreement when the project was constructed in 1972 (100% Federal), citing the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (Section 414, 104 Stat. 4651) for precedence in reference to design deficiencies in accord with the project's original cost sharing agreement. Operations during fiscal year. The District completed repairs to the Terwer Creek portion of the level with 100% Federal funding per the earlier design deficiency study. Total project cost was $1,350,000. The project replaced 500 feet of eroded levee with 27-inch graded riprap to be placed on the entire slope and extended 6 to 10 feet below the existing channel bottom. 14. PETALUMA RIVER, PETALUMA, CA Location. The Petaluma River Basin is situated in Sonoma and Marin Counties, California, on the northwestern shore of San Pablo Bay. Existing project. The project is authorized by Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948. The project currently under construction consists of a Ushaped channel and an earthen trapezoidal channel from Lynch Creek to Lakeville Street Bridge, replacing two road bridges and two railroad bridges. Present estimated total cost for the project $18,181,000 of which $3,985,000 is Federal cost and $14,196,000 in non-Federal cost. Local cooperation. City of Petaluma signed a Project Cooperation Agreement in July 1996, satisfying the requirements of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contract #1 for the U-shaped channel portion of construction was completed in December 1998. Contract #2 for the trapezoidal section of the channel will be advertised by April 1999. The Lakeville Street Bridge was raised by the local sponsor. Maintenance: Operations and maintenance of Petaluma River Channel including engineering and design. Contract dredge removed 192,277 cubic yards, cost $980,108. 15. RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA Location. Russian River rises in Coast Range in northwestern California, flows southerly for 87 miles, and then turns westerly to flow for 23 miles to Pacific Ocean at Jenner, 60 miles northwest of San Francisco, CA. (For general location see Geological Survey map for California.) Existing project. Active authorized project provides for construction of a dam on East Fork of Russian River at Coyote Valley to a height of 160 feet; a dam on Dry Creek at Warm Springs to a height of 319 feet; and channel stabilization works on Russian River between mouth and mile 98, on lower reaches of several tributaries, and on Dry Creek downstream from dam. Project also provides for expansion of fish hatchery capacity at Dry Creek, Warm Springs, to compensate for fish losses on Russian River attributed to operation of Coyote Dam component of project. Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino), completed in 1959, is operated and maintained by the United States. (See tables 34-I and 34-J for latest approved estimated costs.). Local cooperation. Fully complied with for Coyote Valley Dam and channel improvements accomplished to date. For the Dry Creek portion, local interests are required by the authorizing act to comply with the usual a., b., c. requirements for channel improvements and, in addition, prevent any encroachment in the channel of Dry Creek which would interfere with proper functioning of the channel improvement works; adjust all claims concerning water rights arising from the construction and operation of the improvements, including acquisition of water rights needed for preservation of fish and wildlife resources affected by the project; and reimburse the United States in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, for that part of the joint-use construction cost, (30.2 percent currently estimated at $103,760,000) and an ultimate 32.5 percent of the annual operation, maintenance, and replacement joint-use costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply. The estimated annual cost to local interests for maintenance of channel improvement works is $80,000. Sonoma County Water Agency (formerly Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District) provided assurances of willingness and ability to meet requirements by Resolutions No. DR 00793-1, September 25, 1961, No. DR 4770-1, December 17, 1962 and No. DR 45759, August 5, 1974, for Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel. By letter dated March 34-10 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT 7, 1967, Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District further indicated their interest in optimization of the Dry Creek (Warm Springs) damsite to provide additional water supply storage. Reimbursement to the United States for Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel costs allocated to 212,000 acre-feet of water supply storage is specified in a water supply contract with the local sponsor approved in October 1982. Local interests have expended approximately $1,000,000 to provide partial flood protection in project area and have constructed facilities at an approximate cost of $20,000,000 to distribute water from the completed Coyote Valley reservoir. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Coyote Valley Dam: None. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel: Engineering activities continued. The Gualala Redwoods claim that their access to Kelly Road was cut off by Corps project (Warm Springs) went to trial in October 1992. Judgement resulting was a cost of $3,162,000 to the Federal Government. Major items of contract work included: Completion of Liberty Glen wastewater system at fiscal year cost $353,795 and initiation and completion of contaminated soil remediation, $83,000. Maintenance: Coyote Valley Dam: Operation and maintenance continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $35,944. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of East Fork Russian River at Coyote Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 110,305 acre-feet occurred on February 8, 1998. Maximum hourly inflow to reservoir was 8,803 cubic feet per second on February 19, 1998. Maximum release of 5,302 cubic feet per second occurred on February 13, 1998. During the year, 258,000 acre-feet was released for flood control, and 122,500 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel: Operation and maintenance continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Dry Creek at Warm Springs Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 343,289 acre-feet occurred February 9, 1998. Maximum hourly inflow to reservoir was 14,969 cubic feet per second on February 6, 1998. Maximum release of 5,572 cubic feet per second occurred February 11 1998. During the year, 47,300 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Releases for flood control amounted to 278,200 acre-feet. Historical summary. Entire project, exclusive of recreation facilities at completed project (Lake Mendocino), is about 99 percent complete. Coyote Valley Dam, initiated November 1958, was completed April 1959 (cost $17,550,000, of which $11,952,000 was Federal; and $5,598,000 contributed). Work, including removal of slides resulting from storms in 1958, was completed April 1959. Bank stabilization work on Russian River near Geyserville was completed in 1957 and channel improvements in remaining reaches on Russian River and East Fork of Russian River were completed in 1974 (cost $2,483,900). In April 1982, responsibility was transferred to the Sacramento District. Responsibility for civil works operations & maintenance functions for the two projects was transferred back to San Francisco District October 1, 1996. Warm Spring construction completion include fish hatchery in December 1980, project overlook in May 1981, reservoir clearing in July 1981, downstream stabilization sills in October 1981, dam closure in October 1982, spillway repair at Warm Springs Dam in September 1985, boat launching facilities, Phase I, in September 1985, Rockpile Road Upgrade, Yorty Creek Beach, and remedial work at Liberty Glen camping area in September 1990, fish hatchery expansion in September 1992, final control tower grouting, dam access road repair, spillway stabilization, fish hatchery emergency water supply in September 1993, and Liberty Glen wastewater system and contaminated soil remediation. Initial filing of Warm Springs reservoir was commenced on November 1, 1984. Responsibility for construction was transferred to Sacramento District in August 1983. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated at Coyote Valley Dam in fiscal year 1984. Responsibility for civil works operations and maintenance functions for the two projects was transferred back to San Francisco District October 1, 1996. 16. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, as amended and supplemented, included a requirement that local interests maintain and operate completed flood control works in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of War. Inspections made throughout the year to determine effectiveness of operation and maintenance by local interests of completed local protection projects and 34-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 works constructed under emergency and special authorities of Sections 205 and 208 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, and Public Law 99, 84th Congress. In addition, encroachments to Federal Projects such as new bridges, etc. must be reviewed and approved prior to construction by the local sponsor, as well as in compliance with the Clean Water Act permit and endangered species concerns regarding their operations and maintenance activities. Fiscal year cost was $212,802. Total cost to September 30, 1998 was $2,823,853. See Table 34-H for inspections made this fiscal year. 17. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $1,073,379 for preauthorization studies of which $1,012,936 were for Petaluma River, Sonoma County, CA; $47,189 for San Pedro Creek, Pacifica, CA; $98 for White Slough, Solano County, CA; and $13,156 for Section 205 Coordination Account. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year cost incurred for emergency flood control activities were $10,667,923 of which $1,339,777 were for Disaster Preparedness; $7,347,433 for Emergency Operations and $1,980,713 for Rehabilitation. Emergency bank protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Fiscal year total costs were $51,141 of which $41,805 was for Salinas River, Atascadero, CA; and $9,336 for Section 14 Coordination Account. 18. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with sec. 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, summaries of monthly reservoir operations at Del Valle, CA were prepared. No water control manual revisions were completed due to environmental issues. Corps personnel provided advice as requested during flood control operations at the reservoir. Fiscal year cost was $29,502. 19. MISCELLANEOUS WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Project Modification for Improvement of Environment (Section 1135, PL 99-662). Fiscal year total costs were $14,009 of which $5,579 were for Coordination Account funds; and $8,430 for Initial Appraisals, General.. General Investigations 20. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs for surveys were $1,317,497 of which $93,127 were for navigation studies; $316,107 for flood damage prevention; $859,853 for special studies; $46,069 for miscellaneous activities; and $2,341 for coordination studies with other agencies. 21. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year total costs of $96,967 were incurred, of which $92,219 was for Flood Plain Management Service Program and, $4,748 for Hydrologic Studies. 22. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN NOYO RIVER AND HARBOR, CA Noyo River rises in the Coast Range, flows westerly, and empties into Noyo Harbor. Noyo Harbor is a cove on the California Coast about 87 miles south of Humboldt Bay and 135 miles northwest of San Francisco. The 1962 Rivers and Harbors Act, modified by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act, authorized up to two breakwaters as necessary to provide protection. The 1976 Water Resources Development Act, as modified by the 34-12 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT Water Resources Development Act of 1986, authorized construction of additional channel improvements. Recommended plans of improvement for the breakwater and channel improvement were previously considered as a single project. Due to significant differences in the time required for planning and construction, each part is now reported separately. The plan of improvement for Noyo River and Harbor (Breakwater), CA provides for one detached offshore 400-foot breakwater aligned in a north-south direction along the southern portion of Noyo Cove, west of the entrance channel in Noyo Harbor. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $3,642,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $194,561 with General Investigation funds. Planning is about 71 percent complete. A Project Management Plan has been prepared to outline the work remaining on this project. The breakwater has an estimated cost of $23,312,000 of which $18,712,000 is Federal cost and $4,600,000 is non- Federal cost. Due to sponsor's inability to fulfill its cost-sharing requirements, preparation of a final GDM was terminated. However, Conference Report on H.R. 1905, Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1996 directs the Corps to investigate the viability of a pre-fabricated steel structure in lieu of a rubble mound breakwater, including modeling. A special report, which documented this evaluation, was completed in January 1997. A meeting with the Local Sponsor, PG&E and the City of Fort Bragg was held 5 February 1997 to discuss Corps findings. Integrating wave power generation to the breakwater does not decrease the Sponsor's annualized cost because the Sponsor is required to pay all costs associated with power generation. Corps completed a Special Report at the end of December 1996 detailing the findings following a protection project of Noyo Cove investigation of wave plants into the shore/navigation. Two letters from the Noyo Harbor District, dated 26 February 1997, requested the Corps to finalize the GDM and discontinue study of integrating wave power generation into the breakwater. The plan of improvement for Noyo River and Harbor (Channel Extension), CA provides for a 60-foot wide channel, 7 feet deep, for a distance of about 3,000 feet upstream from the end of the existing Federal project to the Dolphin Isle Marina. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $580,000. This project has been put in an inactive category at the request of the sponsor. PAJARO RIVER AT WATSONVILLE, CA The Pajaro River is the dividing line between Santa Cruz and Monterey County located approximately 100 miles south of San Francisco on Monterey Bay. Flooding in the city of Watsonville, the town of Pajaro, and surrounding agricultural lands prompted a re-examination of flood damage prevention in the Pajaro basin. The project provides for modification of the existing levee system built by the Corps in 1949 and includes 2.5 miles of flood control levees and/or floodwalls on Salsipuedes Creek and Corralitos Creek, tributaries of the Pajaro River, as well as pump systems located outside of existing levees on the Pajaro River. The tributaries are located 6 miles from the river mouth. Since the only alternative with Federal interest was within the existing 1966 Rivers and Harbor Act construction authority, on completion of the reconnaissance study, PED was initiated in March 1995. The General Re-evaluation Report is scheduled for completion in September 1999, and construction plans and specifications will be completed in September 2000. Total costs during the Fiscal Year were $380,036 with General Investigations funds. Project total cost is estimated at $20,600,000 of which $10,300,000 is Federal cost and $10,300,000 is non-Federal cost. The local sponsors are Santa Cruz and Monterey Counties. SAN RAFAEL CANAL, CA San Rafael Canal is located on the northwestern shoreline of San Francisco Bay in the city of San Rafael, about 17 miles north of the city of San Francisco. The Canal is surrounded by San Rafael's central business district and dense residential areas. The Study was authorized by a resolution adopted by the Committee on Public Works and Transportation of the United States House of Representatives on August 8, 1984, Section 142 of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1976 (Public Law 94-587), as subsequently amended in Section 705 of WRDA of 1986 (Public Law 99-662). The project was 34-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 authorized for construction in Section 101 of WRDA of 1996. The Feasibility Study recommended the South Floodwall Plan. This plan consists of approximately 9,500 linear feet of floodwall constructed along the south bank of the canal and 1,600 feet of sheet-pile floodwall along the crest of the Bayfront levee on the east side of the canalways tract. The South Floodwall Plan has a benefit-to-cost ratio of 2.0 to 1. Total costs during the fiscal year were $42,351 with General Investigations funds. The estimated project cost is $32,200,000 of which $20,930,000 is Federal cost and $11,270,000 is non-Federal cost. Preconstruction Engineering and Design was initiated in October 1992. The Corps is proposing a continuous floodwall design which is estimated to save between $11.6 to $14.1 million compared to the South Floodwall Plan, as recommended in the Feasibility Study. A letter was sent to the City of San Rafael in December 1996 requested Sponsor's agreement with the Corps proposal to finalize the project design based on the continuous flood wall concept. A District Engineer letter to the Mayor, City of San Rafael, dated 25 September 1997, informed the City that the project has been placed in a suspended status. 34-14 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Project Funding Total Cost to FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 Bodega Bay, CA 12. Corte Madera Creek, CA Federal Funds) Required Contrib.. unds) (Contrib.. Funds, Other) 1. Crescent City Harbor, CA Fisherman's Wharf Areas, San Francisco 2. Humboldt Harbor and Bay, CA 13. Klamath River, Klamath Glen Levee, CA Moss Landing Harbor, CA Napa River, CA Noyo River and Harbor, CA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib.. Cost New Work. Contrib.. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost 55,505 47,132 39,421 55,505 47,132 39,421 - $1,226,765 1240 - 1,226,765 1340 5,423 2,640,272 440 5,423 2,640,272 440 - - - - 397,779 5 - - - - 397,779 5 - - 89,000 304,000 12,851,725 62 2,325 7,276 56,750 232,311 12,735,831 62 - - - - 190,355 63 - - - 190,213 63 - - - - 804,761 64 - - - - 804,761 64 - - 337,000 - - 326,886 41,425 121,063 79,707 41,427 121,063 79,707 125,000 119,652 2,499,000 2,528,563 410,000 381,119 2,515,000 2,600,453 690,000 95,959 1,170 1,170 2,525,000 352,308 2,655,000 2,285,181 (109,000) 483,298 785,000 1,061,475 778,984 955,370 10,000 11,310 307,000 359,898 485,700 478,652 511,000 144,972 833,791 644,254 40,000 381,280 2,398,890 2,676,508 10,302,972 640 9,926,830 640 25,711,795 7 40 25,522,258 740 525,000 8 525,000 8 9,199,000 41 48 50 9,199,000 4149 50 388,488 51 388,488 51 12,947,299 940 11,081,658 940 84,952,597 1040 84,550,098 10 40 - 581,000 (21,439) 557,818 - 338,215 1140 - 338,215 1140 624,030 8,340,135 1240 491,269 8,095,253 1240 - 1,021,274 1340 - 1,021,274 1340 94,090 975,000 476,000 133,314 829,180 280,615 364,000 103,000 (24,000) 249,939 194,562 8,564 58,155 370,997 41,385 324,323 6,424,763 131440 6,077,798 131440 4,121,000 151640 4,120,596 151740 - 9,341,236 181940 69,423 9,340,167 181940 - 222,810 2040 - 222,810 2040 34-15 See Section in Text REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 3. Oakland Harbor, New Work CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Pajaro River at Watsonville, CA 14. Petaluma River, CA (Contributed Funds) Pillar Point Harbor, CA Redwood City Harbor, CA Removal of Sunken Vessels 4. Richmond Harbor, CA (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 15. Russian River Basin, CA, Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino) and Channel Improvements (Fed Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 15,854,000 15,118,783 1,385,056 1,406,861 6,807,295 (120,495) 389,100 346,274 495,000 445,131 1,763,825 1,851,037 9,509,000 9,744,000 26,131,000 9,127,184 10,207,445 26,025,231 750,860 3,041,973 3,877,727 733,078 3,020,151 3,458,835 6,929,971 2,447,239 6,995,637 8,933,227 5,039,611 8,891,780 580,000 595,886 425,833 342,860 429,792 398,391 1,571 111,251 1,571 111,251 93,402,684 21 92,444,913 21 53,463,295 22 52,950,904 22 24,190,142 23,594,913 568,000 408,000 1,945,100 561,854 380,036 1,884,050 978,000 800,000 405,274 1,012,935 406,102 1,852,000 458,020 756,114 4,188;585 23 40 3,502,210 23 40 16,975,538 2440 15,879,652 2440 - 759,000 759,000 - 1,178,338 1,178,338 - - 6,697,396 4344 - - 6,697,396 4344 2,744 38,626 2,348,385 4445 2,744 38,626 2,348,385 4445 - - - - 1,672,722 2540 - - - - 1,672,722 2540 73,632 4,700,000 (312,476) 638,075 18,985,348 26 40 73,632 4,699,998 (362,474) 243,519 18,228,318 2640 - - - - 283,068 - - - - 283,068 1,174,500 1,159,989 3,081,642 3,042,026 803,400 943,132 2,260,954 2,295,397 1,235,000 17,809,000 948,950 16,156,205 4,336,736 6,515,445 4,315,263 6,491,813 - 3,437,000 4,487,200 - 1,033,730 6,681,933 31,187,427 27 28 29,143,430 27 28 47,685,900 29 40 47,629,862 29 40 164,689 164,689 7,924,200 7,715,663 - - - - 14,435,869 54 - - - - 14,435,869 54 2,516,000 2,692,600 2,834,378 2,869,000 50,732,902 55 2,407,709 2,877,136 2,572,324 2,766,987 50,357,065 55 - - - - 589,911 56 - - - - 570,774 57 741,000 55,000 889,811 124,582 333,108,645 58 333,081,773 58 34-16 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 Improvements, CA Maint. (Federal Funds) Approp. Cost (Contrib. Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost San Clemente Maint. Creek, CA Approp. Cost 5. San Francisco Bay New Work to Stockton, CA Approp. (John F. Baldwin Cost and Stockton Ship New Work Channels) Approp. (Contributed Funds) Cost 7. San Francisco Bay New Work and Delta Model, Approp. CA Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 8. San Francisco Bay Maint. Long Term Approp. Management Cost Strategy (LTMS), CA 3,284,000 3,338,900 4,295,991 5,508,000 2,236,709 3,409,978 3,661,869 5,069,869 42,998,934 59 40,836,682 59 - - - - 230,574 60 62 - - - - 228,732 6163 - - 198,000 (198,000) - 1,175,000 1,450,000 623,000 320,000 38,837,200 42 876,848 1,379,150 1,091,643 310,637 38,691,592 42 88,316 1,301,000 1,433,339 320,000 783,067 1,823,000 1,599,752 610,000 711,411 1,990,000 1,805,000 1,970,461 1,896,577 88,316 32,936,917 32,699,123 550,000 40,000 11,951,000 367,759 29,048 11,736,234 San Francisco Harbor, CA San Francisco Harbor and Bay, CA (Removal of Drift) San Leandro Marina, CA San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, CA San Rafael Canal, CA San Rafael Creek, CA Santa Cruz Harbor, CA (Federal Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 889,272 2,064,202 1,384,000 1,109,542 922,149 2,080,354 1,389,663 1,090,286 1,907,000 1,836,000 1,960,000 2,067,000 1,682,577 2,066,074 2,023,648 1,616,890 21,099 87,102 1,137,200 1,132,458 594,000 749,534 2,689,356 28 30 40 2,689,356 28 30 40 40,568,199 3140 40,542,908 3140 41,930,580 40 41,399,602 40 917,600 78,000 4,659,439 32 837,178 136,106 4,637,123 32 - 51,037 1,420,40928 33 40 - 51,037 1,420,409283340 303,000 299,908 458,000 404,344 1,027,000 1,034,130 (37,000) 42,351 388,341 44,635,850 34 40 387,584 44,621,565 34 40 (1,000) 2,182,000 - 2,179,197 - - - - 32,359 40 47 - - - - 32,359 40 47 (52,369) 66,089 1,222,602 476,413 6,736,264 4046 (52,369) 16,744 1,149,852 535,858 6,673,614 4046 - - - - 4,126,808 52 - - - - 4,126,808 52 34-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. - - - - 160,000 35 Cost - - - - 160,000 3 Maint. Aprop. - 18,771 4,690 33,205 9,766,654 40 53 Cost 538 18,771 4,690 33,205 9,766,654 40 53 6. Sonoma Baylands New Work Wetlands Demo Approp. 1,657,500 (932,400) 500,000 720,000 6,320,100 Project, CA Cost 1,756,545 1,026,189 872,566 707,798 6,242,188 New Work (Contrib.. Funds) Approp 410,000 319,000 - 75,000 804,000 Cost 396,222 90,198 231,090 8,567 726,072 Suisun Bay New Work Channel, CA Approp. - - - - 200,928 36 Cost - - - - 200,928 36 Maint. Approp. 598,500 1,101,104 178,400 3,299,252 12,365,996 Cost 1,048,062 960,823 320,469 3,142,611 12,184,471 Suisun Channel, CA New Work Approp. - - - - 217,677 38 Cost - - - - 217,677 38 Maint. Approp. - 98,481 75,505 - 2,891,014 39 Cost - 98,481 75,505 - 2,891,014 39 1. Includes $641,800 for jetties, bulkheads, main Bodega Bay Channel and turning basin completed in 1943. 2. Includes $585,000 for Preconstruction Planning ($456,000 Construction, General funds and $129,000 General Investigation funds). 3. Includes $585,000 Preconstruction Planning costs ($456,000 Construction General costs and $129,000 General Investigation costs). 4. Includes $750,722 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1998. Excludes contributed funds of $385,134. 5. Excludes contribution funds of $2,000. 6. Excludes contributed funds of $271,116 and $2,138 surplus material from Corps military activities. 7. Excludes contributed funds of $44,340. Includes $607,495 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1998. 8. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds in lieu of royalty-free rock. 9. Includes $2,261,371 for previous project. Excludes $95,000 contributed funds for existing project. 10. Includes $98,206 for previous project and $26,457 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1998. 11. Excludes $5,337 previous project costs. 12. Excludes $8,539 surplus material from Corps' military activities. Includes $274,266 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1998. Excludes contributed funds of $180,200. 13. Excludes previous project costs. 14. Includes $943,187 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1998. Excludes $492,788 contributed funds. 15. Includes $11,985 for previous project. Excludes $7,180 contributed funds for previous project. 16. Includes $4,145,000 for Preconstruction Planning ($3,565,000 for Breakwater of which $500,000 allocated under Construction, General and $3,065,000 under General Investigations); ($580,000 for Channel Extension of which $165,000 allocated under Construction, General and $415,000 under General Investigations). 17. Includes $4,112,031 Preconstruction cost ($3,532 031 for Breakwater of which $500,000 was under Construction, General and $3,032,031 under General Investigations); ($580,000 for Channel Extension of which $165,000 was under Construction, General and $415,000 under General Investigations). 18. Includes $32,097 for previous project and $123,380 for reconnaissance and condition surveys FY 1956-1998. Excludes contributed funds of $820 for previous project. 19. Excludes contributed funds of $4,000 in lieu of providing dike disposal areas on existing project. 20. Excludes contributed funds of $1,700. 21. Includes $2,899,232 for previous projects. Excludes $397,266 contributed funds on previous projects. 22. Includes $684,028 for previous projects and $114,155 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1998. 34-18 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT 23. Includes $212,083 for previous project. Excludes contributed funds of $15,559 for previous project. 24. Includes $314,692 for previous project and $366,024 for reconnaissance and condition surveys FY 1956-1998. Excludes contributed funds of $192,424. 25. Includes previous project costs $31,443. Excludes $119,572 contributed funds for existing project. 26. Includes $659,358 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1998. 27. Excludes contributed funds of $524,778. Includes $105,000 Public Works Administration funds. 28. Excludes modification authorized October 27, 1965, under project "San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)." 29. Excludes $115,536 contributed funds. Includes $156,257 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1998. 30. Includes $1,030,399 for previous projects. Excludes $134,591 contributed funds for existing project. Includes $193,000 Public Works Administration funds. 31. Includes $475,321 for previous projects and $813,611 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1997. 32. Authorized by FC Act of 1965 (Sec. 201); Maintenance R&H Act of 1970 (Sec. 103). Includes $321,488 for reconnaissance and condition surveys FY 1979-1997. See FY 1977 Annual Report for last full report. Excludes contributed funds of $879,454. 33. Includes $1,086,703 for previous projects. 34. Includes $1,359,380 for previous projects and $32,832 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1997. 35. Excludes $810,046 contributed funds on previous project. 36. See Sacramento District FY 1974 Annual Report for detail. 37. Project maintenance responsibility to Point Edith was transferred to San Francisco District January 1, 1974. Excludes Sacramento District's portion. Includes $48,735 for reconnaissance and project condition surveys, FY 1976-1997. 38. Project maintenance assigned to San Francisco District from Sacramento District January 1, 1974. See Sacramento District 1972 Annual Report for full report. 39. Includes $635,189 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1978-1998. Includes $727,510 for previous project. Excludes $121,386 contributed funds. 40. See FY 1981 Annual Report for last full report. 41. Excludes Contributed Funds of $709,624. 42. See Sacramento District FY 1985 Annual Report for full report. 43. Excludes $100,000 contributed funds and $105,000 contributed in lieu of royalty-free rock. 44. See FY 1979 Annual Report for last full report. 45. Includes $194,585 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1970-1998. 46. Includes $301,443 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1970-1997. Excludes $93,500 contributed funds. 47. Excludes $41,094 contributed funds. 48. Includes $9,199,000 funds of which $8,499,000 was under Construction, General and $700,000 under General Investigations. 49. Includes $9,199 000 costs of which $8,499,000 was under Construction, General and $700,000 under General Investigations. 50. See FY 1987 Annual Report for last full report. 51. Includes $65,458 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1989-1998. 52. See FY 1988 Annual Report for last full report. 53. Includes $84,312 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1993-1997. 54. Excludes $5,598,000 contributed funds: $400,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects funded under Public Works Acceleration Program; and $1,628,411 for recreation facilities at completed projects funded under Code 711 at Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino. 55. Includes $94,459 special recreation use fees and costs (FY 1982-1983), but excludes prior special recreation fees and cost for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino. 56. Includes $251,911 contributed funds, other from City of Ukiah for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino, hydropower studies; and $338,000 from California Department of Boating and Waterways for launching facility at Lake Mendocino. 57. Includes $250,117 contributed funds, other, costs for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino, hydropower studies; and $320,657 for California Department of Boating and Waterways for launching facility at Lake Mendocino. 58. Includes $253,421,793 previous San Francisco construction funds and costs through August 1983 for Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 59. Includes $964,114 previous San Francisco maintenance funds and costs through April 1982 for Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 60. Includes $208,074 contributed funds, other, from Sonoma County for Dry Creek, Warm Springs, hydropower studies; and $22,500 from City of Ukiah for hatchery pump design at Lake Mendocino. 61. Includes $208,074 contributed funds, other, costs for Dry Creek, Warm Springs hydropower studies; and $20,658 costs for hatchery pump design. 62. Includes $7,303,725 San Francisco District construction funds and costs for Corte Madera Creek. 63. $8,695 contributed funds transferred to Sacramento District in FY 1983. Includes $97,400 San Francisco District required contributed funds and costs. 64. Contributed funds, other, and costs, from Marin County including $536,921 for miscellaneous bridge and road relocations and $267,840 for additional expenses for disposal sites at Corte Madera Creek. 34-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 34-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. CRESCENT CITY HARBOR, CA Jul. 18, 1918 A breakwater bearing S. 26-1/4 E. from Battery Point to Fauntleroy Rock and breakwater from the shore to Whaler Island. Sep. 22, 1922 Modified condition of local cooperation which required that local interests construct a railroad from Grants Pass, Oregon to Crescent City so that a State Highway to Grants Pass would be an acceptable alternate. Jan. 21, 1927 Extension of the breakwater to a length of 3,000 feet and a reduced cash contribution required of local interests. Aug. 30, 1935 Maintaining by dredging of an outer harbor basin, 1,800 feet long, 1,400 feet wide and 20 feet deep, except in rock. Aug. 26, 1937 Construction of a sand barrier from Whaler Island to the mainland and for maintenance dredging in the vicinity of the seaward end of the sand barrier. Mar. 2, 1945 Extension of existing breakwater 2,700 feet to Round Rock (modified by Chief of Engineers, 1952). Mar. 2, 1945 Construction of inner breakwater and removal of pinnacle rock and other material from the harbor to a depth of 12 feet and a harbor basin with a project depth of 10 feet. Oct. 27, 1965 Extension of inner breakwater and dredging of T-shaped harbor basin to depth of 20 feet. HUMBOLDT HARBOR, CA Mar. 3, 1881 Channel 10 feet deep by 350 feet wide to be dredged along Eureka waterfront, thence 8 feet deep by 200 feet wide west to natural channel; dredging Mad River Shoal to 8 feet deep. Jul. 5, 1884 Construct South Jetty and continue channel improvements. Aug. 5, 1886 $75,000 continued improvement of Harbor with provision for title to 12 acres of land to be conveyed to the U.S. Jul. 3, 1892 Map and cost estimates for continuing Harbor improvements with provision for two parallel jetties. Mar. 3, 1899 Continuing Harbor improvements with provision for two parallel jetties. Jun. 25, 1910 Rebuilding the jetties and channel improvements to Arcata and Hookton. Jul. 3, 1930 Eureka Channel 20 feet deep and 300 feet wide; Samoa Channel 20 feet deep and 250 feet wide; Arcata Channel 18 feet deep and 150 feet wide; Fields Landing Channel 20 feet deep and 250 feet wide. Aug. 30, 1935 Entrance Channel 30 feet deep and 500 feet wide. Aug. 26, 1937 Eureka Channel 26 feet deep and 400 feet wide; Samoa Channel 26 feet deep and 300 feet wide; Fields Landing Channel 26 feet deep and 300 feet wide; 34-20 H. Doc. 434, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 67th Congress, 2nd sess. H. Doc. 595, 69th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 40, 74th Cong. Senate Committee Print, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 688, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. Report on file in office, Chief of Engineers. H. Doc. 264, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 59 Cong., 3rd sess. River & Harbor Approp Act of 1884 River & Harbor Approp Act of 1886 Chief of Engrs Annual Report (p.3120) Annual River & Harbor, Approp Acts 1892- 1899 H. Doc. 528, 55th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 950, 60th Cong., 1st sess., H. Doc. 204, 61st, Cong., 2nd sess., H. Doc. 326, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 755, 69th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 14 74th Cong.,lst sess Rivers & Harbors Committee, Doc. 11, 75th Cong., 1st 2. SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Turning Basin (off Fields Landing wharf) channel 26 feet deep, 600 feet wide and 800 feet long. Jul. 16, 1952 Bar & Entrance Channel 40 feet deep, tapered from 1,600 feet to 500 feet wide; North Bay Channel 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide; Eureka Channel 30 feet deep to mile 5.0; Samoa Channel 30 feet deep. August 1968 North Bay Channel 35 feet deep; Samoa Channel 35 feet deep; widen turns at mile 0.75 and 2.6; provide a 1,200 by 1,200 foot anchorage in North Bay. Oct. 12, 1996 Bar and Entrance Channel 48 feet deep; North Bay Channel, Samoa Channel and Samoa Turning Basin 38 feet deep; widen the north side of the Entrance Channel an additional 200 to 275 feet; relocate the southern edge of the Entrance Channel away from the South Jetty and to the north by 100 feet; and widen and realign the entrance to the Samoa Turning Basin. OAKLAND HARBOR, CA June 23, 1874 Jetties. June 25, 1910 North channel in Brooklyn Basin, 25 feet deep, and tidal canal to 18 feet. Sep. 22, 1922 Channel across shoal southeast of Yerba Buena Island and thence to Webster St.; South channel in Brooklyn Basin; Turning Basin at east end of Brooklyn Basin; and channel in Tidal Canal from Brooklyn Basin to Park St., 30 feet deep. Jan. 21, 1927 2 Channel from Webster St. to Brooklyn Basin, maintain area to within 75 feet of pierhead line south of channel from Harrison St. to Harbor Line Point 119 in Brooklyn Basin; dredge a triangular strip about 2,700 feet long and maximum width of 300 feet at western end of Brooklyn Basin, 30 feet deep. Apr. 28, 1928 Local cooperation requirements modified to provide alteration or replacement of bridges by local interests shall apply only to that feature of project covering deepening tidal canal to 25 feet. Drawbridges across Tidal Canal were required by 1882 Decree of Court in condemnation proceedings whereby title was obtained to rightof- way for tidal canal. July 3, 1930 Entrance channel to outer harbor, 800 to 600 feet wide. Mar. 2, 1945 Eliminated requirement that local interests contribute 10 cents per cubic yard toward deepening tidal canal. Mar. 2, 1945 Maintenance of 35-foot depth in channel to outer harbor and in outer harbor channel and turning basin. Oct. 23, 1962 3 Deepen inner harbor 35-foot channels and lower 1,300 feet of north channel in Brooklyn Basin to 35 feet. Nov. 17, 1986 Deepen Inner and Outer Harbor channels to 42 feet. Widen entrance channel to 1,000 feet; sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 143, 82nd dong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 330, 90th Cong., 2nd sess. 1996 WRDA, Public Law 104-303, Section 101 Annual Report, Part II, 1874, p. 378. H. Doc. 647, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 144, 67th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 407, 69th Cong., 1st sess. Public Res. 28, 70th Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 466, 77d Cong., 1st sess. Report on File in Office, Chief of Engineers H. Doc. 353, 87th Cong., 2d sess.I 1986 WRDA, Public Law 99-662 34-21 3. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 34-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents relocate Outer Harbor turning basin 3,000 feet westward and widen turning basin to 1800 feet. Construct 1,200 foot turning basin in Inner Harbor. Aug. 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 193 June 20, 193 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 17, 1981 6. Oct. 5, 1992 12. Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 7, 1966 RICHMOND HARBOR, CA Channel 24 feet deep and 600 feet wide from San Francisco Bay to Ellis Slough (Santa Fe Channel); a turning basin at Point Potrero; a training wall. A 30-foot channel with lessened widths; a turning basin at head of navigation. 5 4 Increase project widths in inner harbor, maintenance of Santa Fe channel to 30 feet; approach areas in outer harbor to 32 feet. 8 Widen channel at Point Potrero and north thereof; enlarge and maintain to 30-foot depth turning basin at Terminal No. 1. Channel 20 feet deep, 150 feet wide, in San Pablo Bay north of Point San Pablo. Channel 35 feet deep and 600 feet wide adjacent to Southampton Shoal; enlarge and deepen to 35 feet approach area to Richmond Long Wharf; widen and deepen inner harbor and entrance channels; deepen turning basin at Point Richmond and southerly 2,000 feet of Santa Fe Channel. Eliminate restriction that widening north of Point Potrero will not be undertaken until local interests furnish assurances industries will avail themselves of improved navigation facilities. and reclamation of Reservation Point. West Richmond channel 45 feet deep, 600 feet wide; enlarge and deepen to 45 feet maneuvering area at Richmond Long Wharf (Sacramento Dist. "San Francisco Bay to Stockton, Calif. (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)"). 6 Deepen channel to 38 feet between Richmond Long Wharf and Santa Fe Channel. Construct 1,200 feet turning basin. SONOMA BAYLANDS WETLANDS DEMONSTRATION PROJECT, CA Restoration of tidal wetland on a 348-acre site using dredged material and construction of a replacement levee around the landward periphery of the site. CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA Levees and channel improvements, lower 11 miles of Corte Madera Creek and tributaries, as modified by Chief of Engineers. Local cooperation requirements modified to provide 1.5 percent cash contribution toward cost of Ross Valley unit. 4. 34-22 H. Doc. 515, 63rd Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 16, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 7, 73rd Cong., 1st sess., and 10, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc 598, 75th Cong., 3rd. sess. H. Doc. 715, 76th Cong., 3rd. sess. H. Doc. 395, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess.1 H. Doc. 208, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 1 1986 WRDA, Public Law 99-662 Section 106, 1992 WRDA, Public Law 102-580 H. Doc. 545, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. Sec. 204, 1966 Flood Control Act SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Nov. 17, 1986 Modify existing project to direct construction of Unit Sec. 823, 1986 4 from Lagunitas Road Bridge to Sir Francis Drake WRDA Boulevard, and to include construction of floodproofing measures in vicinity of Lagunitas Road Bridge to insure proper functioning of completed portions of authorized project. Further modify project to eliminate any channel modifications upstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard. 13. KLAMATH RIVER, KLAMATH GLEN LEVEE, CA Nov. 7, 1966 Repair the Klamath Levee which consists of about 8,900 Flood Control Act feet of riveted levee (15-40 feet in height) and interior of 1966, Public drainage facilities. Law 89-789, 89th Cong., 2nd sess. 14. PETALUMA RIVER, PETALUMA, CA Jun. 30, 1948 Floodwalls and channel improvements along 3,600 feet Flood Control Act of the Petaluma River and tributaries, of 1948, Public Law 80-858, 80th Cong., 2nd sess. 15. RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA May 17, 1950 Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino): Channel H. Doc. 585, 81st improvements on lower 98 miles of Russian River Cong., 2d sess. and lower reaches of tributaries. Feb. 10, 1956 Increased appropriation authorization for initial PL 404, 84th Cong., stage of project development. 2d sess. Oct. 23, 1962 Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake; Channel H. Doc. 547, 87th Improvements on Dry Creek below dam. Cong., 2d sess. Mar. 7, 1974 Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and channel; Sec. 95, 1974 compensate for fish losses on the Russian River WRDA which may be attributed to the operation of the Coyote Dam component of the project through measures such as possible expansion of the capacity of the fish hatchery at the Warm Springs Dam component of the project. 1. Contains latest published map. 2. Included deepening of tidal canal above Park Street Bridge to 25 feet, which was deauthorized November 6, 1977. 3. Reconstruction of Fruitvale Avenue Highway Bridge (S. Doc. 75, 87th Cong., 2d sess.) which was deauthorized November 6, 1977. 4. Included in part in Public Works Administration Program, September 6, 1933. 34-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 34-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30 1998 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Berkeley Harbor, CA ' Completed 1966 $ 155,550 2 $58,118 9 Berkeley Marina, CA 1 Completed 1979 505,201 3 Monterey Harbor, CA Completed 1971 1,108,182 4 1,826,930 5 San Francisco Harbor (Islais Creek), CA 1 Completed 1976 848,227 7 117,852 11 San Francisco Marina (Gas House Cove), CA Completed 1974 180,472 6 88,174 10 San Leandro Marina (Breakwater), CA 1 Completed 1976 210,390 8 71,061 2 Sausalito Canal, Richardson Bay, CA Inactive 1963 103,095 131,409 13 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 7. Includes $94,550 preauthorization costs. 107, Public Law 86-645). 8. Includes $72,000 preauthorization costs 2. Excludes $155,551 contributed funds. and excludes contributed funds $138,189. 3. Excludes $378,989 contributed funds. 9. Includes $58,118 for jetty condition 4. Includes $207,800 Public Works surveys for FY 1987-1998. Administration funds and breakwater 10. Includes $88,174 for reconnaissance and modifications (1960 Act) placed inactive 1974. condition survey for FY 1990-1998. The barrier groin and sandtrap feature of the 11. Includes $117,852 for reconnaissance and project was deauthorized November 17, 1986, by condition survey for FY 1994-1998. WRDA of 1986. 12. Includes $71,061 for reconnaissance and 5. Includes $372,696 for reconnaissance and condition survey through FY 1998. condition survey for FY 1956-1998. 13. Includes $61,244 for reconnaissance and 6. Includes preauthorization costs $26,855 condition survey through FY 1998. and excludes contributed funds $153,618. TABLE 34-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Humboldt Bay (Buhne Point), CA Lower San Francisco Bay, CA Knights Valley Lake, R.R. Basin, CA Oakland Harbor, CA (Deepen Tidal Canal) Oakland Harbor, CA (Fruitvale Avenue Bridge) San Lorenzo Creek, CA (Upper Portion) San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, CA (Approaches to Vallejo and South Vallejo) Santa Cruz County, CA 1958 1935 1974 1981 1981 1962 1982 1966 Jan. 1, 1990 Jan. 1, 1990 Aug. 5, 1977 Nov. 6, 1977 Nov. 6, 1977 Nov. 6, 1977 Nov. 6, 1977 Jan. 1, 1990 34-24 $ 2,000 245,639 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 10 of Text) Location Dates of Inspection Alameda Creek Apr 1998 Corte Madera Creek Apr 1998 Coyote Creek Apr 1998 Dry Creek Jun 1998 East Weaver Creek Jun 1998 Eel River at Sandy Prairie Jun 1998 Guadalupe River Jul 1998 Klamath River Jun 1998 Mad River at Blue Lake Jun 1998 Pajaro River, Monterey County Mar 1998 Pajaro River, Santa Cruz County Mar 1998 Pinole Creek Apr 1998 Redwood Creek Jun 1998 Rheem Creek Apr 1998 Rodeo Creek Apr 1998 Russian River, Mendocino County Jun 1998 Russian River, Sonoma County Jun 1998 San Leandro Apr 1998 San Lorenzo Creek Apr 1998 San Lorenzo River Jul 1998 San Pablo Creek Apr 1998 Uvas Creek Apr 1998 Wildcat Creek Aug 1998 34-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 34-I RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA: ESTIMATED COST FOR NEW WORK (See Section 15 of Text) Estimated Cost Non-Federal Project Feature Federal Contribution Total Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino): Channel Improvements below Dam on lower 98 miles of Russian River $ 14,436,000 $ 5,598,000 $ 20,034,000' Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Improvements below Dam 259,240,000 103,777,000 2 363,017,000 Total $273,676,000 109,375,000 $ 383,051,000 1. Exclusive of $1,628,000 for recreation supply storage to be paid over a period not to facilities at completed projects. exceed 50 years after use of storage is initiated 2. Reimbursements by local interests to and inclusive of lands and damages. Federal Government for costs allocated to water TABLE 34-J RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA: PROJECT FEATURES AND ESTIMATED COST (See Section 15 of Text) Height of Nearest City Distance Dam and Capacity Estimated Name (California) Above Mouth Type (Acre-Ft) Cost Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mile 0.8 East Fork 160 Feet- Mendocino) Ukiah of Russian River Earthfill 122,500 $ 17,550,000 ' Channel Improvements (East Mile 0 to 0.8 East Fork) Ukiah Fork - - 2,484,000 below Coyote Valley Dam and lower 98 miles of Mile 0 to 98, Russian Russian River Guerneville River - 319 Feet- Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Healdsburg Mile 14.4 Dry Creek Earthfill 181,000 363,017,000 Channel Improvements (Dry Creek) below Dry Creek Mile 1 to 14.4 Dry (Warm Springs Dam) Healdsburg Creek - - 2,864,000 1. Exclusive of $1,628,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects. 34-26 SACRAMENTO CA, DISTRICT * This district comprises basins of Suisun Bay and San Joaquin and Sacramento Rivers in California; Goose Lake in Oregon; basins of the Great Salt Lake and Sevier Lake in Utah; an intervening portion of Great Basin in northern Nevada, northern California, and southeastern Idaho; and the upper Colorado River basin, which is in southwestern Wyoming, eastern Utah, northeastern Arizona and western Colorado, west of the Continental Divide. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Sacramento River, CA................ 35-2 2. Sacramento River, Deep Water Ship Channel, CA ................. 35-3 3. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) ..................... 35-4 4. San Joaquin River, CA ................ 35-4 Flood Control 5. American River Watershed, CA (Common Elements) ................ 35-5 6. Buchanan Dam-H.V. Eastman Lake, Chowchilla River, CA ................ 35-5 7. Cache Creek Settling Basin, CA ......... 35-6 8. Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek and Tributaries, including New Hogan Lake And Farmington Dam, CA ............. 35-7 9. Colorado River at Grand Junction, CO .... 35-8 10.Corte Madera Creek, CA .............. 35-9 11. Coyote and Berryessa Creeks, CA ....... 35-9 12. Fairfield Vicinity Streams, CA ........ 35-10 13. Guadalupe River, CA ............... 35-10 14. Hidden Dam-Hensley Lake, Fresno River, CA ................... ...... 35-11 15. Isabella Lake, Kern River, CA ......... 35-11 16. Kaweah and Tule Rivers, including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, CA ... 35-13 17. Little Dell Lake, UT ................ 35-14 18. Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek NV and CA ....................... 35-15 19. Merced County Streams .............. 35-16 20. Merced County Stream Group, CA ..... 35-17 21. Pajaro River, CA ................... 35-17 22. Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, CA .... 35-17 23. Redbank and Fancher Creeks, CA ...... 35-19 24. Russian River Basin, including Dry Creek (Warm Springs Lake) and Lake Mendocino (Coyote Valley Dam), CA ... 35-20 25. Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA from Collinsville to Shasta Dam ........ 35-21 26.San Lorenzo, CA .................. 35-23 Flood Control (Cont'd) Page 27. Upper Jordan, UT ................. 35-24 28. Walnut Creek, CA .................. 35-25 29. West Sacramento, CA .............. 35-26 30. Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA ..... 35-26 31. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................... 35-27 32. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization ...................... 35-28 33. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ................ 35-28 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 34. New Melones Lake, CA .............. 35-28 General Investigation 35. Surveys .......................... 35-30 36. Collection and Study of Basic Data ..... 35-30 37. Research and Development ........... 35-30 38. Preconstruction Engineering & Design .. 35-30 39. Other Work under Special Authority .... 35-31 Tables Page Table 35-A Cost and Financial Statement ............. 35-33 Table 35-B Authorizing Legislation ............. 35-44 Table 35-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ...... 35-47 Table 35-D Not Applicable Table 35-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ......... 35-48 Table 35-F Not Applicable Table 35-G Deauthorized Projects ..... 35-51 Table 35-H Sacramento River, CA: Tidal and Flood Conditions Prevailing ............. 35-52 Table 35-I San Joaquin River, CA: Total Cost of New Work For Projects ............ 35-52 Table 35-J San Joaquin River, CA: Project Units (1950 Modification) Reclassified and Excluded from Project Cost ............ 35-53 35-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 IMPROVEMENTS (Cont'd) Table 35-K Merced County Stream Group, CA, Maximum Inflow, Storage, And Outflow for Projects .. 35-53 Table 35-L Russian River Basin, CA: Estimated Cost for New Work ...... 35-54 Table 35-M Russian River Basin, CA: Project Features and Estimated Costs ......... 35-54 Table 35-N Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA, Collinsville To Shasta Dam: Project Units Units Reclassified and Excluded From Cost Estimate ...... 35-55 Table 35-0 Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA, from Collinsville To Shasta Dam: Construction Accomplished and Contract Costs ................. 35-55 Table 35-P Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization Flood Control Activities Pursuant To Section 205, Public Law 80-858, as Amended (Preauthorization) ....... 35-56 Table 35-Q Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Under Special Authorization Pursuant to Section 206, Public Law 104-303 ........... 35-56 Table 35-R Snagging and Clearing Under Special Authorizatin Pursuant to Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act Public Law 83-790 ... 35-57 Table 35-S Surveys ............... 35-57 Navigation 1. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Location. Rises in Trinity Mountains in north-central California, flows generally southerly about 374 miles and empties into Suisun Bay, an arm of San Francisco Bay, at Collinsville, CA. (See Geological Survey topographic map of Sacramento Valley, CA.) Previous projects. For details see page 1985 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1708 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel, see Annual Report for 1969. Total first cost for completed portion was $43,932,558 ($39,560,558 Federal (Corps), $300,000 (Coast Guard), and $4,072,000 non-Federal for lands and damages, including relocations) and excludes local interests cost $10,741,000 (June 1963) for 30-foot deep water ship channel and 13-foot deep connecting canal basic terminal facilities required under terms of project authorization. Project also provided for a shallow-draft channel 10 feet deep at mean lower low water 150 to 200 feet bottom width, from Suisun Bay to Sacramento, CA, 60 miles; a depth of 6 feet at low water between Sacramento and Colusa, 85 miles; a depth of 5 feet at low water between Colusa and Chico Landing, 50 miles; and such depths as practicable between Chico Landing and Red Bluff, 53 miles, a total distance of 248 miles. However, shallow-draft channel feature Colusa to Red Bluff (including Colusa to Chico Landing, 50 miles and Chico Landing to Red Bluff, 53 miles) was deauthorized by 1986 Water Resources Development Act on November 17, 1986 (Public Law 99-662). (See table 35-H on tidal and flood conditions prevailing.) 35-2 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fully complied with for deep water ship channel project. None required on shallow-draft feature. Terminal facilities. Piers, wharves, and docks at Port of Sacramento for shallow-draft navigation are open-pile structures with timber decks, some of which are designed to meet extreme high waters of flood stages. All main wharves at Sacramento have rail connections. Three of above facilities are owned by city of Sacramento and remainder by private interests; all are privately operated. For full description see "Port and Terminal Facilities at the Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif., 1986." Deep water terminal facilities comprise wharves and piers, administration and storage buildings, and belt railroad facilities. Majority of these facilities are owned and operated by Sacramento-Yolo Port District; remainder are privately owned and operated. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New work, Deep Water Ship Channel: None. Maintenance: Shallow Draft Channel: Maintenance and operation activities continued in Sacramento River, Sacramento upstream to Colusa. Deep Water Ship Channel: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Historical summary. Construction of 7-foot shallow-draft channel below Sacramento was initiated in September 1899 and completed in 1904. Modified 10-foot shallow-draft channel up to Sacramento was initiated in FY 1928 and completed in 1931. Shallow-draft channel above Sacramento was begun in April 1946 but new work was discontinued when about 48 percent complete. In February 1974, remaining work for shallow-draft portion of project, provision of a 5-foot depth between Colusa and Chico Landing (50 miles), was reclassified as "deferred." Channel is navigable all year; however, there is no regular navigation above Colusa, 145 miles above river mouth. On November 17, 1986, remaining shallow-draft feature, Colusa to Red Bluff (including Colusa to Chico Landing, 50 miles and Chico Landing to Red Bluff, 53 miles) was deauthorized by 1986 Water Resources Development Act (Public Law 99-662). Construction of 30-foot deep water ship channel was initiated in July 1949; improvement dredging by continuing contracts resulted in provision of an operational facility for oceangoing vessels during June 1963. Basculebridge was completed in April 1960, barge lock in August 1961, barge canal in November 1961, and entire deep water ship channel in June 1970. 2. SACRAMENTO RIVER DEEP WATER SHIP CHANNEL, CA Location. On the Sacramento River between Collinsville and the Port of Sacramento, a distance of about 43 miles, in the counties of Sacramento, Contra Costa, Solano, and Yolo, CA. Existing project. Project provides for deepening to 35 feet the Suisun Bay and Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channels from New York Slough to the Port of Sacramento, and the Avon to New York Slough reach to 35 feet which will be accomplished under the San Francisco Bay to Stockton (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) project, and widening the channel as necessary. Current selected plan also provides for a water quality monitoring program, and establishment of wetland habitat and upland habitat to mitigate for losses of such habitat. Project estimate (October 1996 price level) is $49,500,000 comprising Federal cost (Corps) of $24,600,000; Federal cost (Coast Guard) for navigation aids $300,000; and non-Federal cost of $24,600,000 for lands and damages, relocations, and spoil retention dikes, including the cash contribution ($8,210,000) that local interests must pay. Existing project was adopted by Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1985, August 15, 1985 (Public Law 99-88), 99th Cong., 1st sess. and modified by 1986 Water Resources Development Act, November 17, 1986 (Public Law 99-662) 99th Cong., 2d sess. Local cooperation. Local interests, through a public body legally authorized and financially capable, must give assurances they will furnish lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, and other facilities where necessary in the construction of the project; and provide retention dikes for dredged material disposal area; and pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction, presently estimated at $8,210,000. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) (Sec. 221) was executed June 27, 35-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 1986. An LCA modification necessitated by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 was executed December 6, 1988. Construction has been postponed indefinitely until local interests develop a financial plan to obtain non-Federal cash contribution. Terminal facilities. All main wharves at Sacramento have rail connections. Three of above facilities are owned by city of Sacramento and remainder by private interests; all are privately operated. For full description see "Port and Terminal Facilities at the Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif., 1986." Deep water terminal facilities comprise wharves and piers, administration and storage buildings, and belt railroad facilities. Majority of these facilities are owned and operated by Sacramento-Yolo Port District; remainder are privately owned and operated. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Project coordination was continued. Historical summary. General Design Memorandum was approved and Record of Decision was signed in May 1987. Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) modification was approved and was signed by Port of Sacramento on August 19, 1987. LCA modification was executed December 6, 1988. First construction contract was awarded February 2, 1989 and completed in July 1990; second contract was awarded September 12, 1990 and completed in August 1991. 3. AND FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CA (JOHN F. BALDWIN AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNELS) Reported on by the San Francisco District. Refer to Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1995. 4. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA Location. Rises in east central California and flows westerly and northwesterly about 340 miles to its confluence with Sacramento River at head of Suisun Bay, 48 miles northeast of San Francisco. Deep water channel in San Joaquin River extends 41 miles from its mouth in Suisun Bay at Pittsburg to city of Stockton. Waterborne access to city provided by Stockton Channel, an artificial cut extending from river about 2 miles into city. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Sheet 5527.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement, modifications, and authorizing acts, see Annual Report for 1967. (See table 35-I for total cost of new work for project completed in May 1960.) Projects units (1950 modification) reclassified and excluded from project cost are set forth in table 35-J. Modification of existing project is included as one unit of San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA, (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) project, authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 209, 89th Cong., 1st sess.); this modification is reported in detail under Sacramento District, improvement No. 3 and San Francisco District, Improvement No. 3. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project; for details of required cash contributions on completed, inactive and deferred portions of project, see Existing project paragraph, Annual Report for 1967. Terminal facilities. For description of harbor facilities at Port of Stockton, CA, see Port Series 32, "The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif.," revised 1986. Downstream from Stockton, traffic is accommodated by bank landings and sheds except at Antioch and near Pittsburg, where there are wharves for shallow- and deep-draft vessels. Terminal transfer facilities at public ocean terminal of Port of Stockton are adequate for present and immediate future. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition studies and miscellaneous inspections and reports were accomplished by hired labor. Dredging was initiated and completed at contract cost of $2,870,625. (Repair or restoration of wavewash protection is required by legislation authorized by Improvement No. 3.) Historical Summary. Active portion of existing project was completed in May 1960. Construction of project was initiated in December 1877. 35-4 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT Flood Control 5. AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED, (Common Elements) Location. The project is located in Placer, El Dorado, and Sacramento Counties on the North, Middle and South Forks of the American River and along the lower American River and Sacramento Rivers. Existing Project. Recent evaluations indicate that the level of flood protection along much of the American River and in the Natomas area is less than the 100-year level. The project consists of levee improvements including a slurry wall along 24 miles of the lower American River and levee and berm raising along 12 miles of the Sacramento River, telemetered gages above Folsom Dam, and improving the flood warning system for the lower American River. Cost estimate (October 1997) is $63,300,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $47,600,000 is Federal cost and $15,700,000 is non-Federal cost (which includes $9,800,000 cash contribution). Local cooperation. In accordance with cost sharing requirements specified in Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986, local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and borrow and excavated or dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, and pay 16 percent of the costs allocated to flood control to bring the total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 percent, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation and replacement of flood control facilities. The non-Federal sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Project cooperation agreement (PCA) was signed July 13, 1998. Operations and results during fiscal year. First construction contract (Howe Avenue to Watt Avenue reach) in the amount of $7,058,316 was awarded July 17, 1998; continued engineering and design for remaining contracts. Historical summary. The Defense Appropriations Act for FY 1993 authorized construction of the Natomas feature of the project, which includes levee improvements around the perimeter of the Natomas basin, a 300-acre detention area in North Natomas, and recreation trails. The local sponsor has already constructed much of the project. Federal Construction General funds were appropriated in FY 1998 to initiate reimbursement to the sponsor for the Federal share of the project. The Defense Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 1993 also directed the Corps to reevaluate other features recommended in the Feasibility Report and a Supplemental Information Report (SIR) was completed in March 1996. The Chief of Engineer's Report recommended implementation of elements common to the final candidate plans presented in the SIR. These "common elements," were authorized for construction in WRDA 96 and Federal Construction General funds were appropriated in FY 1998 for initiation of construction. 6. BUCHANAN DAM-H.V. EASTMAN LAKE, CHOWCHILLA RIVER, CA Location. On Chowchilla River about 36 miles above its mouth and about 16 miles northeast of city of Chowchilla, CA. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a 205-foot high rockfill dam to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 150,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, recreation, and fish and wildlife. In conjunction with dam, project plan provides for about 12 miles of downstream levee and channel construction on Ash Slough to accommodate a project design flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second within slough and 7 miles of levee and channel improvement on Berenda Slough. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Total first cost for existing project is $28,919,597, of which $27,369,597 is Federal cost, including $4,580,000 for basic recreation facilities, and $1,550,000 non-Federal costs for lands and damages, including relocations for downstream levee and channel improvements. Local interests have contracted with the Bureau of Reclamation for irrigation service. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. 35-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Local interests have also, over a period of years, expended about $500,000 for construction of low levees and clearing downstream channels to provide some local flood protection in project area. This work is inadequate during major floods. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 98, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Lake formed by Buchanan Dam on Chowchilla River was designated "H.V. Eastman Lake" by Public Law 93-217. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities were continued. Runoff of Chowchilla River above Buchanan Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 140,413 acre-feet occurred June 13, 1998. Maximum hourly inflow to reservoir was 9,515 cubic feet per second on January 15, 1998. Maximum release of 2,496 cubic feet per second on February 10, 1998, was above maximum permissible flood release. During the year, a total of 83,041 acre-feet of water was released for irrigation and other purposes. Releases for flood control purposes totaled 112,000 acre-feet. Historical summary. Construction began in July 1971 and was completed in May 1979. Construction of Buchanan and Hidden dam and appurtenances was combined under one contract. Project was completed in September 1983, except for installation of piezometers (now deferred indefinitely). Dam closure was in March 1975; dam was completed in January 1976. Reservoir clearing and boundary marking were completed May 1975. Bifurcation structure was completed in February 1976. Channel improvement, Ash and Berenda Sloughs, was completed in March 1976. Recreation areas: Phase I was completed in January 1976; Phase II was completed in February 1978. Residences, administration building, and visitors center contract was completed in May 1978. Landscaping was completed in May 1979 and erosion control was completed in April 1979. A resources interpretive display and road relocation were completed in FY 1982. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1981. Solar heating was installed at Chowchilla recreation area in FY 1984. An hydrilla eradication (spraying) program was initiated in FY 1989. Final land audit was approved on December 3, 1985. 7. CACHE CREEK BASIN, CA (CACHE CREEK SETTLING BASIN) LOCATION. At the mouth of Cache Creek in Yolo County where it enters the Yolo Bypass about 2 miles east of city of Woodland and about 15 miles northwest of city of Sacramento, CA. Existing project. Provides for raising the perimeter levees of the existing settling basin an average of 12 feet, extending the levees upstream to County Road 102 to provide 50-year sediment storage capacity, enlarging and reconstructing the cobble weir, and degrading existing training levees and rebuilding them adjacent to western perimeter levee to provide 50 years of sediment storage capacity (340 acre-feet annually.). Estimated cost (October 1993) for existing project is $20,130,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $11,710,000 is Federal and $8,420,000 is non-Federal (which includes $1,010,000 cash contribution). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986 (HD 98-134, 98th Cong., 1st sess., contains published map.) Project as authorized included development of a national wildlife refuge within the settling basin; however, the Department of the Army determined that such refuge would be more appropriately funded and developed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Refuge feature was reclassified to deferred category on April 11, 1988. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges) and other facilities where necessary in construction of the project; pay 5 percent of cost allocated to flood control to bring total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 percent of which $1,010,000 is cash contribution, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction.Local Cooperation Agreement was executed March 12, 1990. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering activities were continued. Levee repair contract was awarded in August 1996. Cache Creek 35-6 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT Settling Basin work was transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance in December 1993. Historical summary. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed March 12, 1990. Cache Creek Settling Basin enlargement (multicomponent) construction contract was awarded August 5, 1991, completed in September 1993, and work was transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance on December 2, 1993. 8. CALAVERAS RIVER AND LITTLEJOHN CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, INCLUDING NEW HOGAN LAKE AND FARMINGTON DAM, CA Location. Streams comprising Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek groups rise in Sierra Nevada and its foothills; flow easterly across flatlands of San Joaquin Valley and empty into San Joaquin River directly, or through various sloughs, in vicinity of Stockton, CA. Littlejohn Creek is in Calaveras, Stanislaus, and San Joaquin Counties. The three principal stream systems of the group are, from south to north, Lone Tree Creek, Littlejohn Creek, and Duck Creek. Calaveras River group is in Calaveras and San Joaquin Counties. The two principal streams of the groups are, from south to north, Calaveras River and Bear Creek. (See Geological Survey Valley Springs quadrangle for New Hogan reservoir area and Trigo and Bachelor Valley quadrangles for Farmington reservoir area.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements consisting of Farmington Dam, New Hogan Lake, and Bear Creek levee and channel improvement, and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1967. (a) Farmington: Total first cost (July 1955) for project was $3,995,684, of which $3,676,384 was Federal and $319,300 non-Federal for lands and damages including relocations. (b) New Hogan: Federal cost for project is $15,906,150, including $543,514 for basic recreation facilities. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost for recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $897,742. (c) Bear Creek: Project cost is $6,485,734, of which $3,242,867 is Federal, including reimbursement ($488,096) to local interests of one-half of excess local interest cost of lands, rights-of-way, and relocations over estimated Federal construction cost in accordance with section 3, Public Law 738, 74th Congress. Non-Federal cost included in above amount is $3,242,867 for relocations and lands and damages, exclusive of above Federal reimbursement. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. New Hogan: Local interests must pay portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to conservation functions of project. These costs are estimated at 36.2 percent of first cost and 38 percent of annual costs. In addition, local interests contributed land, the (July 1964) market value of which was $556,000. For years 1961 through 1970, an interim contract between the Bureau of Reclamation and local water users provided for storage and payment of irrigation water; a long-term contract between that agency and local water users was executed August 25, 1970. Local interests paid $4,514,003 through December 31, 1996. A concessionaire at New Hogan Marina provided public use facilities in accordance with lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost to date of $234,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: New Hogan Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Bear Creek, San Joaquin County: None. Maintenance: Farmington Dam Maintenance and operation activities continued; structures were maintained in serviceable condition. During rainflood season, maximum flow of Duck Creek Diversion was 2,122 cubic feet per second on February 3, 1998. Maximum flow of Littlejohn Creek at Farmington was 2,388 cubic feet per second on February 3, 1998. Maximum flow of Duck Creek near Farmington was 556 cubic feet per second on February 3, 1998. Maximum storage in reservoir was 53,512 acre-feet on February 9, 1998, and maximum estimated inflow to reservoir was 24,830 cubic feet per second on February 3, 1998. Maximum release of 24,830 cubic feet per second on February 6, 1998, was above maximum permissible flood release. During the year, 180,600 acre-feet was released for flood control. New Hogan Lake Maintenance and operation activities continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $2,339. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Calaveras River above New Hogan was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 243,336 acre-feet occurred May 28, 1998. Maximum hourly inflow to reservoir was 33,055 cubic feet per second on February 3, 1998. Maximum release of 8,003 cubic feet per second on February 8, 1998, was 35-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 above maximum permissible flood release. During the year, 127,408 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Release for flood control purposes amounted to 207,500 acre-feet. Historical summary. FarmingtonDam: Construction of Farmington project was initiated in July 1949 and completed for beneficial flood control operation in 1952. Duck Creek channel improvement was completed in November 1951; and channel improvement on south Littlejohn Creek was completed in May 1955. There are no recreation facilities or public-use areas. All work completed. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1982. New Hogan Lake: Construction was initiated May 1960, main dam closure November 1963, project completed for operational use in June 1964, and all work completed October 1973. Recreation facilities have been provided from Code 710 appropriations. Seepage measurement weir constructed in June 1980. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1980. Bear Creek, San Joaquin County: Construction began in June 1963 and was completed in June 1967. Final cash contribution was made to local interests December 23, 1970. Solar heating was installed at recreation facilities in FY 1984. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. 9. COLORADO RIVER AT GRAND JUNCTION, CO Location. On north bank of Colorado River from 9th Street west to the Denver Rio Grande Western Railroad Bridge at city of Grand Junction, CO, in Mesa County. Existing project. Provides for construction of a 3,200 foot levee located on north side of Colorado River, one road ramp over levee for accessing Watson Island, 3 detention basins, a relief well system and a 550-foot-long impermeable blanket to prevent seepage though railroad embankment. Estimated cost (September 1994) is $1,651,200, of which $1,086,700 is Federal cost and $564,500 is non-Federal cost for lands and damages and includes a cash contribution of $63,000. Existing project was approved by Chief of Engineers on February 28, 1994, under provisions of section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local sponsor shall furnish to the Government all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas, as determined by the Government to be necessary for construction, operation, and maintenance of the project, and shall furnish to the Government evidence supporting local sponsor's legal authority to grant rights-of-entry to such lands. Necessary lands, easements, arid rights-of-way may be provided incrementally, but all lands, easements, and rights-of-way determined by the Government to be necessary for work to be performed under a construction contract must be furnished prior to advertisement of the construction contract. Local sponsor shall provide or pay to the Government the cost of providing all retaining dikes, wasteweirs, bulkheads, and embankments, including all monitoring features and stilling basins that may be required at any dredged material disposal areas necessary for project construction. Upon notification from the Government, local sponsor shall accomplish or arrange for accomplishment at no cost to the Government all relocations (excluding railroad bridges and approaches thereto) determined by the Government to be necessary for project construction. Local sponsor shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, as amended by Title IV of the Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1987 (Public Law 100-17), and the Uniform Regulations contained in 49 CFR Part 24, in acquiring lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent operation and maintenance of the project, and inform all affected persons of applicable benefits, policies, and procedures in connection with said Act. Local sponsor shall provide such documentation as contracting officer requires to demonstrate compliance. The Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) between the Department of the Army and the City of Grand Junction, CO, was signed April 8, 1994. Operations and results during fiscal year. O&M Manual and As-Built drawings were finalized. Project audit, close-out activities and fiscal completion continued. 35-8 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT Historical summary. Plans and specifications were completed in August 1994. Non-Federal cash contribution of $63,000 for construction was received September 27, 1994. First construction contract in amount of $575,830 was awarded September 30, 1994. 10. CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA Reported on by San Francisco District. Refer to Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1996. 11. COYOTE CREEK, CA (KNOWN AS COYOTE AND BERRYESSA CREEKS) Location. Project is located in the cities of San Jose and Milpitas immediately south of San Francisco Bay in Santa Clara County, CA. Existing project. Plan of improvement on Coyote Creek consists of overflow channels and offset levees. Improvement on Berryessa Creek includes two sedimentation basins at the upstream end of the concrete lined trapezoidal channel and offset levees. Combined plan would provide flood protection from Coyote and Berryessa Creeks to cities of San Jose and Milpitas, which include large industrial complexes and some residential development. Estimated cost (October 1998) for the Coyote Creek element of the existing project is $61,750,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $30,890,000 is Federal and $30,860,000 is non-Federal (which includes $3,100,000 cash contribution). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Estimated cost (October 1998) for the Berryessa Creek element of the existing project is $16,525,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $12,425,000 is Federal and $4,100,000 is non-Federal (which includes $1,830,000 cash contribution). Existing project was authorized under Section 101(a)(5) of WRDA 1990, Public Law 101-640 (HD 101-126, 101st Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. (Coyote Creek) Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and borrow and excavated or dredged material disposal areas, which may be reduced for credit allowed based on prior work (Sec. 104 of WRDA 86 ($8,633,000), Sec. 26 of WRDA 88 (not to exceed $3,000,000) and Sec. 215 of the Flood Control Act of 1968 (not to exceed $3,000,000) after reductions for such credit have been made in the required cash payments; modify or relocate utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, and perform prior work under Sec. 104 of WRDA 86, Sec. 26 of WRDA 88, and Sec. 215 of the Flood Control Act of 1968, where necessary for the construction of the project; and pay 5 percent of the costs allocated to flood control, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation and replacement of flood control facilities. Local interests will receive an estimated Federal reimbursement of $8,280,000 for one-half of non-Federal costs allocated to flood control in excess of Federal costs (Sec. 103 of WRDA 86). (Berryessa Creek) Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and borrow and excavated or dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project; and pay 11 percent of the costs allocated to flood control to bring the total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 percent, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation and replacement of flood control facilities. The non-Federal sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Coyote Creek mitigation contract continued at a fiscal year cost of $162,711. Historical summary. Separate General Design Memorandums were prepared for Coyote and Berryessa Creeks. General Design Memorandum for Coyote was submitted in May 1993. Local interests have completed construction of Reach 1 (Sec 104, Water Resources Development Act (WRDA), Reach 2 (Sec 26, WRDA) and Reach 3A (Sec 215, WRDA). National Defense Authorization Act for FY 1994 directed the Secretary of the Army to construct project notwithstanding sec 902, WRDA. Project Cooperation Agreement was executed in September 1994. Coyote Creek Reach 3B construction contract was completed at a final cost of $5,308,925. Preconstruction engineering and design cost is $4,410,000. Total reimbursement of $7,400,000 for costs in excess of 50% maximum requirement and credit payments of $14,633,000 for prior integral work, have been made to the local sponsor as of September 30, 1997. 35-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 12. FAIRFIELD VICINITY STREAMS, CA Location. On five streams in vicinity of cities of Fairfield and Suisun, Solano County, CA. Existing project. See Annual Report for 1996, p.35- 8. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. In accordance with FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (Public Law 99-88) and sec. 117 of the Further Continuing Appropriations Act for FY 1986 (Public Law 99-190), a Local Cooperation Agreement for flood control and recreation (Sec. 221) was executed June 3, 1986. Operations and results during fiscal year. Project close-out activities were on-going. Historical summary. Construction was initiated in October 1986. Enlargement of McCoy Creek and construction of Laurel Creek Diversion Channel, Phase I, was transferred to local interests in July 1987; Laurel Creek Diversion Channel, Phase II, was transferred to local interests in November 1988; Laurel Creek Diversion Channel, Phase III, was transferred to local interests in April 1990; and Laurel Creek Diversion , Phase IIA, was transferred to local interests in December 1990 for maintenance. Channel improvement contract for Ledgewood Creek Channel, Phase IV, was completed and transferred to local interests in December 1991 for maintenance. Mitigation planting on Ledgewood Creek was completed in April 1993; maintenance inspection has been completed. Construction of Laurel Creek pedestrian bridge overcrossing was completed and transferred to local interests on July 8, 1993. 13. GUADALUPE RIVER, CA Location. On Guadalupe River in downtown area of city of San Jose, Santa Clara County, CA. Existing project. Authorized plan provides for widening and deepening one or more sides of Guadalupe River for 2.5 miles from Interstate Highway 280 to Interstate Highway 880 in downtown San Jose, CA, and channel modifications with provisions for fish and wildlife mitigation, as necessary. Non-Federal sponsor must pay 100 percent of incremental construction cost of locally preferred plan. Project is an integral component of a much larger regional park plan being undertaken by the San Jose Redevelopment Agency. Estimated cost (October 1997) is $182,800,000 (which includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) of which $78,500,000 is Federal and $104,300,000 is non-Federal including reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1990 which directed the Secretary of the Army to construct the project notwithstanding Sec. 902 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 regarding project cost limitations, and Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1992 which directed the Secretary of the Army to modify and construct the project in accordance with the January 1991 GDM; it is consistent with the Guadalupe River Park plan requested by the local sponsor and with cost sharing policy. Local cooperation. Local interests, through a public body legally authorized and financially capable, must give assurances they will furnish lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas, which are partially offset by a credit ($5,701,000) allowed for prior work (Sec. 104, Water Resources Development Act of 1986); credit was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project; pay 5 percent of the costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Federal reimbursement will be made to non-Federal sponsor for one-half of non-Federal costs allocated to flood control in excess of Federal costs. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. On June 2, 1989, the local sponsor, the Santa Clara Valley Water District, expressed intent to provide all needed cost sharing funds. On September 21, 1990, the San Jose Redevelopment Agency requested modification of project to include recreation facilities and confirmed that they intend to participate as local sponsor for recreation. Local Cooperation Agreements for both flood control and recreation were executed March 30, 1992. 35-10 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction contract No. 2 (Hedding Street to Coleman Avenue), was completed with fiscal year cost of $257,000 (Interstate 880 to Hedding Street). Fiscal year mitigation costs included Early Plant collection for Contract 2 (Hedding Street to Coleman Avenue) of $15,000 and River Street Historic Salvage and Demolition $560,000.. Historical summary. Final General Design Memorandum (GDM) reflecting locally preferred plan, was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army on March 26, 1992, with comments. Revision of GDM to address comments was completed in July 1993. Local Cooperation Agreements for both flood control and recreation were executed March 30, 1992. Construction contract No. 1 for channel improvement (Highway 880 to Hedding Street) was awarded August 10, 1992; and was essentially completed and transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation on August 11, 1994. Construction contract No. 2 (Hedding Street to Coleman Avenue) was awarded July 8, 1994, and was essentially completed and transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation on October 25, 1996. 14. HIDDEN DAM-HENSLEY LAKE, FRESNO RIVER, CA Location. On Fresno River about 50 miles above its mouth and about 15 miles northeast of Madera, CA (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a 163-foot high earthfill dam to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 90,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, recreation and other purposes. In conjunction with the dam, the project provides for about 13 miles of downstream levee and channel improvements on Fresno River immediately upstream of Chowchilla Canal crossing to accommodate project design flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Total first cost for existing project is $31,785,426, of which $30,555,426 is Federal cost, including $3,564,168 for basic recreation facilities, and estimated $1,230,000 non-Federal cost for lands and damages including relocations for downstream levee and channel improvements. Local interests have contracted with the Bureau of Reclamation for irrigation service. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Local interests have also, over a period of years, expended about $300,000 for construction of low levees and clearing downstream channels to provide some local flood protection in the project area. This work is inadequate during major floods. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 37, 87th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Lake created by Hidden Reservoir project on Fresno River was designated "Hensley Lake" by Public Law 93-603. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work. None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities were continued. Runoff of Fresno River below Hidden Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 87,600 acre-feet occurred June 8, 1998. Maximum hourly inflow to the reservoir was 6,918 cubic feet per second on February 3, 1998. Maximum release of 2,595 cubic feet per second on February 5, 1998, was above maximum permissible flood release. During the year, 59,355 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes and 95,600 acre-feet was released for flood control. Historical summary. Construction began in July 1971 and was completed in January 1979. Dam closure was in March 1975; dam was completed November 1975. Instrumentation was completed in January 1976. Downstream channel improvement, Fresno River, was completed April 1976. Recreation areas: Phase I was completed in March 1976; Phase II was completed in June 1978. Residences, administration building, grounds, and utilities contract was completed in February 1978. Landscaping was completed in December 1978 and erosion control was completed in January 1979. Project was completed in September 1980. Final land audit was approved February 5, 1980. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1980. Piezometer installation was completed in September 1982. Solar heating was installed at recreation areas in FY 1984. 15. ISABELLA LAKE, KERN RIVER, CA Location. About 35 miles northeast of city of Bakersfield, CA, near confluence of north and south forks of Kern River; auxiliary dam is about one-half mile east of main dam. (See Geological Survey 35-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 quadrangles of area.) In 1991, Isabella Lake and 16,000 acres of surrounding land was transferred to the Forest Service in exchange for about 2,500 acres of Forest Service land near Pine Flat Lake. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1967. Federal cost for new work is $22,027,452. For future non-Federal reimbursement see Local cooperation and Licenses paragraphs. Federal cost funded from Code 710 appropriations is $2,199,085. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. California officially adopted project by chapter 1514 of statutes of 1945, State of California. Local interests, represented by North Kern, Buena Vista, and Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage Districts and La Hacienda Water District, were required to reimburse the Federal Government the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation functions of project. These costs, based on a cost allocation study completed in December 1955, are $4,573,000 of first cost and 21.7 percent of annual operation and maintenance cost. For the years 1956 through 1964, an interim contract between the Bureau of Reclamation and local water users provided for storage and payment of irrigation water. Under provisions of this interim contract, local interests paid $1,936,229 through December 31, 1964. A long-term contract between the Bureau and local water users was executed October 23, 1964. Balance due on allocated first cost of $4,573,000 was paid by the water users on March 31, 1965. Kern County assumed administration of recreation and development and maintenance of public use areas at project in accordance with a 25-year license February 15, 1955. The agreement with Kern County provided for joint operation and development by the Corps and Kern County including permits granted to concessionaires by the county to provide certain services. As of September 30, 1971, Kern County relinquished all administration of recreation and development and maintenance of public use areas at the project. A State law permitting the Department of Boating and Waterways (known as the Department of Navigation and Ocean Development prior to January 1979) to participate in inland water development with Federal agencies was signed by the Governor on August 11, 1972. Isabella Lake and surrounding land, 16,000 acres around the lake currently being used for park and recreation purposes, was turned over to the Forest Service by the Corps on May 15, 1991, in exchange for approximately 2,500 acres of Forest Service recreation land near Pine Flat Lake. This was accomplished by using a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of Agriculture (Forest Service). The MOU requires an exchange of land between departments. Three Corps maintenance employees, under supervision of the Success Lake park manager, will stay at Isabella to operate the dam for flood control and water conservation purposes. Authority for new concessionaire operating permits to be issued, as well as those previously granted by the Corps, will be transferred to the Forest Service. Total cost to date of present recreation facilities developed by the county and the marina concessionaires is about $965,000; $235,000 of this was a grant from the California Wildlife Conservation Board and about $534,000 is investment by marina concessionaires. Licenses. In accordance with Federal Power Commission Docket No. E-6578, issued April 1, 1963, payment of $377,426 was made to the Federal Government by Pacific Gas and Electric Co. ($108,352) and Southern California Edison Co. ($269,074) for headwater benefits to downstream existing plants from Isabella Dam to cover benefits from April 15, 1954, to December 31, 1962. Between 1962 and 1982, the power companies have in the aggregate made annual payments of $44,650 for headwater benefits. That amount was to be paid each year until changes in operation, development, or costs indicated some modification to be advisable. Federal Power Commission Docket No. E-6578 was revised by Docket No. HB07-75-4-000 (order issued July 11, 1983 under 24 FERC, paragraph 62052) which modified cumulative use charges after 1974, effective retroactively. Such charges will now vary each year. An adjustment (years 1974 through 1984) was included in 1984 payment of $244,790. The 1985 payment was $52,747; 1986 payment was $51,905. No payment was received in 1987. The 1988 payment was $58,187. No payment was received in 1989. Two payments ($60,894 and $55,443) were received in 1990; $60,983 was received in 1991; $65,975 in October 1991 (FY 1992) $77,577 in October 1992 (FY 1993), and $62,231 in October 1993 (FY 1994). Cumulative use charges collected by the Federal Power Commission (known as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission since January 9, 1978) and returned to the U. S. 35-12 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT Treasury through period ending September 30, 1995, amounted to $2,150,458. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation continued. Structures were maintained in good condition. Runoff of Kern River above Isabella Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 562,474 acre-feet occurred July 23, 1998. Maximum hourly inflow to the reservoir was 10,019 cubic feet per second on June 30, 1998, and maximum outflow of 4,642 cubic feet per second occurred June 29, 1998. During the year, 1,228,983 acre-feet was released for irrigation and 160,000 acre-feet was released for flood control. Historical summary. Construction began in March 1948 and was completed in June 1968. Main dam, Borel Canal outlet works and appurtenances, and auxiliary dam were completed in April 1953. Storage impoundment began December 1952. Piezometer was installed in August 1982. Project is operating to provide flood protection and irrigation benefits for which it was designed. Recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1979. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. On May 15, 1991, Isabella Lake and surrounding land, 16,000 acres around the lake currently being used for park and recreational purposes, was turned over to the Forest Service by the Corps in exchange for approximately 2,500 acres of Forest Service recreation land near Pine Flat Lake. A memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of Agriculture (Forest Service) was used. The MOU requires an exchange of land between departments. Three Corps maintenance employees, under supervision of the Success Lake park manager, will stay at Isabella to operate the dam for flood control and water conservation purposes. 16. KAWEAH AND TULE RIVERS, INCLUDING TERMINUS DAM AND SUCCESS LAKE, CA Location. Terminus Dam is on Kaweah River about 20 miles east of Visalia, CA. Success Lake is on Tule River about 5 miles east of Porterville, CA. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) Existing project. Terminus Dam: For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost of new work is $19,302,957, including $242,605 for basic recreation facilities and excluding spreading works constructed by local interests at an estimated (July 1957) cost of about $750,000. Spreading works portion of project has been deauthorized. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, Public Law 93-251, as amended, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of that portion of project. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $700,004. Success Lake: For description of completion improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost of new work for Success Lake is $14,247,221, including $253,697 for basic recreation facilities. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $747,048. For future non-Federal reimbursements, see Local cooperation paragraph. Operation and maintenance of reservoirs is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. California officially adopted projects by chapter 1514 of statutes of 1945, State of California. Local interests for Terminus Dam are represented by Kaweah Delta Water Conservation District. Local interests for Success Lake are considered to be represented by the Vandalia, Porterville, and Lower Tule River Irrigation Districts, the Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District, and Pioneer Water Co., which represent over 90 percent of irrigated land and water-right holders along Tule River below damsite. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation functions of projects. These costs are estimated at 14.1 percent of first and annual costs for Terminus and 9.5 percent of first and annual costs for Success. Local interests for Terminus stated they will continue to operate and maintain spreading works and downstream channel systems to provide required capacity for disposal of floodwaters. Local interests for Success stated they will continue to maintain downstream channel systems to provide required capacity for disposal of floodwaters. Repayment contracts between the Bureau of Reclamation and local water users for irrigation supply from Terminus and Success reservoirs were executed January 11, 1965, and April 30, 1965, respectively. Reservoirs are being operated for irrigation storage as well as flood control and incidental recreation use. Tulare County acquired water for recreation pools at 35-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 the projects. Local interests paid the following total amounts for irrigation services from the reservoirs through December 31, 1995: Terminus, $2,307,209 and Success, $1,110,572. Tulare County was granted a 25-year license for planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Success, July 10, 1960, and at Terminus, June 5, 1961. Basic public-use facilities constructed by Corps at the Success reservoir were transferred to jurisdiction of Tulare County on January 18, 1962; facilities at Terminus were transferred June 20, 1962. In March 1967, an amendment to the license agreements was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army. Under these amended licenses, Tulare County retained administration of only specified land areas and operation and maintenance of recreation facilities in these areas. In addition, they continued their program of water safety, boat inspection, and law enforcement at both reservoirs. The Corps took over the administratior, of the remainder of the project land areas and the operation and maintenance of recreation facilities in these areas. Calif. Department of Fish and Game expended funds to improve fishery resources of the Terminus reservoir. As of April 1, 1972, Tulare County relinquished all planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Terminus Dam. Tulare County by expenditure of county funds and by a lease to a marina concessionaire has aided in the development of recreation facilities at an estimated cost of $199,000. Calif. Department of Fish and Game expended funds in conjunction with Tulare Sportsman's Council and developed a habitat for upland game birds at Success Lake. As of April 1, 1972, Tulare County relinquished all planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Success Lake, except for the Bartlett Park recreation area. Tulare County has aided in development of recreation facilities. Total cost to date of present recreation facilities developed by the county ($360,000) and the marina concessionaires ($373,000) is about $733,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Terminus Dam, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None Success Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Terminus Dam: Maintenance and operation continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $107,154. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Kaweah River above Terminus Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 150,450 acre-feet occurred on July 10, 1998. Maximum hourly inflow to the reservoir on February 23, 1998, was about 9,612 cubic feet per second. Maximum outflow of 4,532 cubic feet per second occurred July 3, 1998. Irrigation and spreading releases totaled 726,425 acre-feet. Releases for flood control totaled 180,000 acre-feet. Success Lake: Maintenance and operation continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $94,226. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Tule River above Success Dam was above normal during the year. Maximum storage of 92,823 acre-feet occurred on July 3, 1998. Maximum hourly inflow to the reservoir was 12,424 cubic feet per second on February 23, 1998, and maximum outflow of 1,848 feet per second occurred on April 19, 1998. Irrigation and spreading releases amounted to 269,126 acre-feet. Releases for flood control amounted to 170,000 acre-feet. Historical summary. Terminus Dam: Construction of project began in July 1957 and was completed in June 1968. Final land audit was approved on April 20, 1987. Construction of main dam and appurtenances, initiated in February 1959, was completed in June 1962. Dam has been operating since November 1961 to provide flood protection for which it was designed; conservation impoundment was commenced May 1962. Appurtenances are in good condition. Recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1979 and completed in FY 1989. Piezometer installation and a cultural resources survey were completed in FY 1984. Success Lake: Construction of project began in November 1956, was completed in June 1968, and final audit of historical land record was approved December 17, 1979. Construction of main dam and appurtenances, initiated in October 1958, was completed in May 1961. Dam has been operating since October 1960 to provide flood protection for which it was designed; conservation impoundment was commenced March 1962. Recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1979. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. 17. LITTLE DELL LAKE, UT Location. On Dell Creek, a tributary of Parleys Creek, about 8 miles east of Salt Lake City upstream of Mountain Dell Reservoir in Salt Lake County, UT. 35-14 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT Existing Project. Project providing for construction of a dam about 253 feet high to create a reservoir with a gross capacity of 30,000 acre-feet for flood control, municipal and industrial water supply, recreation and fish and. wildlife was authorized by the 1968 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 53, 90th Cong., 1st sess., contains published map) as modified by sec. 170, Water Resources Development Act of 1976, Public Law 94-587, October 22, 1976. Facility would be operated in conjunction with existing downstream 3,200 acre-foot Mountain Dell Reservoir on Parleys Creek for flood control and water supply. Authorized project has been reexamined and scaled down to reflect local interests' ability to pay. Current plan of improvement includes only flood control and water supply purposes. Recreation was deferred as of May 30, 1986, and Emigration Creek Diversion was deleted and placed in an inactive status. Recreation was reactivated in 1995 and the Recreation DM approved in 1996. The project includes an earthfill dam 224 feet high, a 20,500 acre-foot reservoir, and 10,035 feet of pipeline to divert water from Parleys Creek. Estimated project cost (September 1997) is $65,300,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) of which $41,215,000 is Federal and $24,085,000 is non-Federal for lands and damages and includes a cash contribution of$19,955,000. Project is included in FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (Public Law 99-88) August 15, 1985. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities where necessary in the construction of the project; pay all costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply; pay 13 percent of costs allocated to flood control to bring total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 percent, bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities; and pay a cash contribution presently estimated at $19,995,000. By letters of January 22, 1986, and January 24, 1986, the Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County indicated their support and willingness to proceed with a reduced scale project based on their "ability to pay." A Local Cooperation Agreement (Sec. 221) was executed on June 10, 1986. Water Revenue Bonds were issued August 27, 1986, and proceeds from the sale in the amount of $14,300,000 have been deposited in the Little Dell Construction Fund Account. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering activities continued. Historical summary. A Local Cooperation Agreement (Sec. 221) was executed June 10, 1986. Construction was initiated in April 1988. Construction of core trench and test fill was completed in February 1989. Main dam and appurtenances contract was awarded May 12, 1989 and completed in September 1993. Project was transferred to the local sponsor for maintenance and operation on March 26, 1993. Dam was dedicated on August 5, 1993. 18. MARTIS CREEK LAKE, MARTIS CREEK, NV AND CA Location. Reservoir is on Martis Creek a tributary of Truckee River, near Truckee, CA; intermittent channel improvements are on Truckee River in Reno, NV. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for areas.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost for project was $8,503,789 including $289,506 for basic recreation facilities. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations was $1,200. Construction of recreation facilities under Code 710 was determined to be infeasible. Operation and maintenance of reservoir is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation of project, including recreation facilities, was continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff above Martis Creek Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 3,631 acre-feet occurred on March 28, 1998. Maximum inflow to the reservoir was 970 cubic feet per second on March 24, 1998, and maximum outflow of 349 cubic feet per second occurred April 1, 1998. During the year, 2,073 acre-feet was released for irrigation purposes. Releases for flood control amounted to 27,000 acre-feet. Historical summary. Project construction began in August 1967; dam closure was in October 1971; dam 35-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 completed in August 1972; basic recreation facilities were completed in December 1972; and project was completed in June 1974. Recreation facilities under Code 710 funding were considered infeasible. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1981. 19. MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CA Location. In vicinity of city of Merced, CA, on streams draining from Mariposa County foothills of the Sierra Nevada into Merced County. Streams lie easterly of and drain into the San Joaquin River between Chowchilla River on the south and Merced River on the north. Drainage area represents about 1,000 square miles; nearly 700 square miles of foothills and mountains in Mariposa County and about 300 square miles of flood plain in Merced County. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Project is a modification of Merced County Stream Group, Calif., Improvement No. 18, authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 473, 78th Cong., 2d sess.) and completed in FY 1957. Existing project provides for construction of three new reservoirs Castle, Haystack Mountain, and Marguerite on Canal, Black Rascal, and Deadman-Dutchman Creeks, respectively, and enlargement of four existing reservoirs Burns, Bear, Owens, and Mariposa, providing a total capacity of 126,700 acre-feet for multipurpose storage; and about 52 miles of levee and channel improvements in lower reaches of Bear, Black Rascal, Mariposa, and Deadman Creeks, thereby tying the existing project channels into Eastside Bypass of San Joaquin River flood control system. Haystack Mountain, Bear, and Owens projects would provide flood control only; Castle and Burns projects, flood control and recreation; Marguerite project, flood control and irrigation; and Mariposa project, all three purposes. Existing project was adopted by 1970 Flood Control Act. Current plan of improvement would defer enlargement of existing Burns reservoir, Mariposa reservoir, construction of Marguerite Dam, and the irrigation function associated with the latter two facilities, enlargement of existing Owens reservoir and about 32 miles of levee and channel improvement on Owens, Mariposa, and Deadman-Dutchman Creeks. Estimated total project cost (October 1996) is $132,700,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $91,800,000 is Federal and $40,900,000 is non-Federal (which includes a $6,855,000 cash contribution). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project; pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated at $282,000, of which $240,000 is a cash contribution and $42,000 is for lands; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Total non-Federal share of Castle Dam first cost is $5,230,000 and includes cash contribution of $595,000. The California Reclamation Board and the City of Merced are the local sponsors of the authorized project. The Reclamation Board will serve as sole sponsor for the Castle Dam Unit. Merced County Board of Supervisors reaffirmed their support for the project by letter of April 4, 1986. City of Merced by letter of March 13, 1986, reaffirmed its support for and intent to furnish assurances for recreation aspects of the project. California Reclamation Board reaffirmed its support for total project by letter of April 9, 1986. A Local Cooperation Agreement (Sec. 221) was executed for Castle Dam Unit on June 27, 1986. State of California legislation (AB3369) was enacted on September 14, 1986 which enabled the Reclamation Board to financially participate in the project. A new Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army November 30, 1988, in accordance with the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The California Reclamation Board, the Merced County Board of Supervisors and the city of Merced have indicated support for balance of the project by letters of intent dated August 29, 1991 and August 20, 1991, respectively. This support was again reaffirmed in letters of support as provided by the California Reclamation Board on January 9, 1996. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering activities continued for Bear Creek Dam Unit. Engineering activities continued at Castle Dam to prepare plans and specifications for one final contract (advertised for construction on August 26, 1997) to enable Edendale Turnout to provide the flow capacity as identified in the Check Structure Hydrology Report Criteria. Castle was transferred to sponsor for maintenance and operation in April 1995. 35-16 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT Historical summary. Castle Dam multicomponent construction contract was awarded February 26, 1991, and construction was completed in March 1993. Castle Dam check structure contract was initiated in April 1993 and completed in January 1994. Castle Dam was transferred to the sponsor on April 12, 1995. 20. MERCED COUNTY STREAM GROUP, CA Location. Reservoirs and channel improvements are on Bear, Burns, Mariposa, and Owens Creeks, in foothills of Sierra Nevada about 15 to 20 miles east of city of Merced, CA. (See Geological Survey Haystack Mountain quadrangle for Burns and Indian Gulch quadrangle for Bear, Owens, and Mariposa areas.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1962. Improvements consist of reservoirs at Mariposa, Owens, Burns and Bear Creeks and diversions from Black Rascal Creek to Bear Creek and from Creek to Mariposa Creek. Total first cost for project was $3,899,259, of which $2,751,259 was Federal and $1,148,000 non-Federal for lands including relocations and channel improvement. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary maintenance and operation of the four completed reservoirs continued. Structures were maintained in a serviceable condition. Runoff from drainage areas below Merced County stream group reservoirs was above normal for the year. See Table 35-K for maximum inflow storage and outflow for the projects. Outflows were less than channel capacity rates in the project streams. Historical summary. Construction was initiated March 1948, with construction of Mariposa project, which was completed in November 1948. Construction of Owens project, initiated in March, was completed in October 1949; Burns project, initiated in July 1949, was completed in January 1950; and Bear project initiated in April, was completed in December 1954. Black Rascal and Owens Creek diversion channels and stream-gaging stations were completed in April 1956. Local interests completed channel enlargement and restoration of channel capacities of Miles, Burns, Owens, and Mariposa Creeks in 1956 at their expense. Improvement of Bear Creek and Black Rascal Slough, below their confluence, was deferred pending possible improvements downstream, outside limits of project. 21. PAJARO RIVER, CA Location. In the Uvas-Carnadero and Llagas Creeks watersheds of the upper Pajaro River Basin in south Santa Clara County in vicinity of the city of Gilroy about 75 miles south of San Francisco, CA. Existing project. See Annual Report for 1996, pg. 35-15. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) for flood control was executed with the Santa Clara Valley Water District on June 25, 1987, and LCA for recreation was executed with the City of Gilroy on July 27, 1987. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project is fiscally completed. Historical summary. Responsibility for remaining portions of advance engineering and design, plans and specifications, and construction was transferred to Sacramento District in April 1982. Construction began in October 1987. Construction for the first contract (levee work and bike path upstream of Thomas Road Bridge), second contract (levee work and hiking trails), and third and final contract (landscaping) has been transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Total reimbursement of $5,583,369 has been made to the local sponsor. 22. PINE FLAT LAKE AND KINGS RIVER, CA Location. Reservoir is on Kings River, about 25 miles east of Fresno, CA, and channel improvements are on Kings River downstream from Lemoore weir, about 25 miles south of Fresno. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) Project also includes 2,500 acres of Forest Service recreation land near Pine Flat Lake. Existing project. Improvement is a unit in comprehensive plan for flood control and other related purposes for Sacramento-San Joaquin Basins. Project consists of a 429-foot high concrete gravity dam, including a gated overflow section with a maximum 35-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 discharge capacity of 391,000 cubic feet per second, creating a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 1 million acre-feet, for flood control, irrigation, and related purposes. Outlet provisions for future power development are included in dam, but Federal construction of power-generating facilities is not authorized. Improvement also includes levee and channel work on Kings River and its tributaries on valley floor about 25 miles south of Fresno. Channel improvement work will enlarge channel capacities and regulate flows in lower branches of the Kings River. There are nine public-use and recreation areas: One maintained by the Corps, four by the Forest Service, three jointly by the Corps and concession, and one by Fresno County. Also, five boat access-only areas are maintained by the Corps on the south side of the reservoir. Project cost is $42,072,330, of which $41,502,330 is Federal (including $13,700 for basic recreation facilities) and $570,000 non-Federal for rights-of-way for downstream channel improvements. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost of recreation facilities for Pine Flat Lake, funded from Code 710 appropriations is $1,595,100 exclusive of recreation facilities previously provided at a cost of $13,700. In addition, Federal cost of recreation facilities for Pine Flat Lake, funded from Public Works Acceleration Executive Act of 1962 appropriations, was $239,235 (July 1963). Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is Federal responsibility. Existing project was adopted by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 630, 76th Cong., 3d sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for first costs allocated to irrigation functions of reservoir portion of project in accordance with reclamation law. Under provision of War Department Civil Appropriations Act of 1947, the Secretary of War, with concurrence of the Secretary of the Interior, determined allocation of cost to irrigation should be set at an amount not to exceed $14,250,000. In addition, local interests must pay 37.4 percent of annual maintenance, operation, and replacement costs of dam and reservoir allocated to irrigation function. Repayment contracts between the Bureau of Reclamation and the local water users for the irrigation use of the reservoir were executed December 23, 1963. The Bureau is administering the contracts in accordance with reclamation law as amended by the Reclamation Reform Act of October 12, 1982. That act generally exempts the limitations under the early reclamation laws as being applicable to projects constructed by the Corps with two exceptions; however, all existing contracts to share construction and maintenance costs remain in effect. Prior to execution of the final contracts, the Bureau provided conservation water to local interests under an interim contract. Irrigation interests paid $140,872 for irrigation services through December 31, 1996. With respect to the downstream channel improvements, sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. King River Conservation District represents local interests; assurances were accepted November 20, 1959. Local interests have furnished all requirements for construction rights-of-way for construction of channel improvements required to date. Three concessionaires each at Lakeridge Marina (Deer Creek), Pine Flat Marina and Trimmer Marina provided public-use facilities in accordance with lease agreements with the Secretary of the Army. Estimated cost to date of facilities installed by these concessionaires is $1,727,000. Fresno County developed public-use facilities on an 85-acre tract immediately downstream from dam for picnicking, camping, swimming, and playground activities, at an estimated cost of $476,000 under provisions of a license agreement. The U.S. Forest Service developed and operates a picnic area at the upper end of reservoir. Cost of site development is about $37,500. Installation of a hydroelectric powerplant, located at the downstream toe of the Corps Pine Flat Dam, was completed in January 1984 by Kings River Conservation District. Project consists of an outdoor-type powerhouse containing three generating units with capacities of 55 megawatts each for a total of 165 megawatts. Conservation District would make use of the three existing 13.5-foot diameter penstocks that were installed in Pine Flat Dam when constructed in 1954. Licenses. License No. 1988, effective April 1, 1955, was issued by Federal Power Commission to Pacific Gas and Electric Co. for hydroelectric power development of North Fork Kings River by the company upstream from the Pine Flat reservoir. Under interim Contract No. DA-04-167-eng-1182 with the Department of the Army, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. paid for storage of power water in the Pine Flat reservoir May 15, 1954, through March 31, 1955. Current Contract No. DA-04-167-eng-1328 with the Department of the Army provides for storage of power water at the rate of 0.1375 per acre-foot; the contract covers April 1, 1955, through March 31, 2005. By an 35-18 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT agreement of January 1972, supplementing the December 1954 contract, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. transferred ownership of most of its Kings River system water to the Kings River Water Association. Accordingly, no further significant storage service to Pacific Gas and Electric Co. by the reservoir at Pine Flat is anticipated. Total payment under these contracts through June 30, 1972, (last year of payment), amounts to $2,478,798; these funds were paid to Sacramento District and deposited for return to the Treasury. License No. 2741, effective September 25, 1979, was issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to the Kings River Conservation District for hydropower development at the downstream toe of the Corps Pine Flat Dam. Payment to the Department of the Army for construction and installation of the penstocks in the amount of $1,044,685 was made to Sacramento District and deposited for return to the Treasury in November 1985. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $18,235. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Kings River above Pine Flat Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 993,626 acre-feet occurred on July 25, 1998. Maximum hourly inflow to the reservoir was 19,128 cubic feet per second on June 17, 1998, and maximum outflow of 11,825 cubic feet per second occurred on July 12, 1998. During the year, 1,624,942 acre-feet was released for irrigation and spreading. Releases for flood control amounted to 1,000,000 acre-feet. Historical summary. Construction began in April 1947 and project, including channel improvement, was completed in September 1977. Main dam was initiated in January 1950, completed in June 1954, and has been operating since February 1954 to provide flood protection for which it was designed. Total of 35.2 miles of new and reconstructed levees and 13.2 miles of channel clearing have been transferred to the Kings River Conservation District for maintenance. Recreation facilities for various recreation areas under Code 710 appropriation are complete. Completed preliminary design and cost estimates for Pine Flat fish barrier were reviewed by the State, but the State was unable to provide necessary assurances of local cooperation. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1982. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. On May 15, 1991, Pine Flat Lake acquired additional acreage as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Secretary of the Army and Secretary of Agriculture (Forest Service). The Corps exchanged Isabella Lake and the 16,000 acres around that lake currently being used for park and recreational purposes for approximately 2,500 acres of Forest Service recreation land near Pine Flat Lake. 23. REDBANK AND FANCHER CREEKS, CA Location. Northeast and adjacent to the Fresno- Clovis Metropolitan Area in Fresno County about 170 miles southeast of Sacramento, CA. Existing project. Provides for flood control detention basins on Redbank Creek, Pup Creek, and Alluvial Drain; construction of a dam 45.5 feet high to create a reservoir with gross capacity of 10,300 acre-feet for flood control on Fancher Creek; and enlargement of Big Dry Creek project to provide increased flood protection and recreational development. Since the local sponsor does not support recreational development at this time, the recreation feature of the project is considered to be inactive. The Authorization Act states "measures determined appropriate by the Secretary of the Army to minimize benefits to groundwater recharge" shall be included in the project. Estimated cost (October 1997) for existing project is $73,710,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $47,460,000 is Federal and $26,250,000 is non-Federal (which includes $3,670,000 cash contribution). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by Sec. 401, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986. (HD 98-147, 98th Cong., 2d sess., contains published map.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges) and other facilities where necessary in construction of the project; pay 5 percent of cost allocated to flood control to bring total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 35-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 25 percent, of which $3.680,000 is cash contribution, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering activities, real estate crediting, and project auditing were continued. Historical summary. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on August 1, 1987. Project construction was begun in September 1987 with initiation of archaeological work on Cultural Resources Preservation. Construction contract for Dry Creek Crossing was completed and transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance on January 10, 1989. Construction at Redbank Creek Detention Basin was completed and transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance on August 23, 1990. Construction contract for Fancher Creek Dam awarded May 23, 1990, was completed and transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance on March 13, 1992. Construction contract for Big Dry Dam, Pup and Alluvial detention basins was awarded March 18, 1992. Big Dry Creek Dam and Pup Creek Detention Basin were transferred to local interests on June 22, 1994. Last piece of completed work, Alluvial Drain Detention Basin, was transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation on July 18, 1994. 24. RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA Location. Russian River rises in Coast Range in northwestern California, flows southerly for 87 miles, and then turns westerly to flow for 23 miles to Pacific Ocean at Jenner, 60 miles northwest of San Francisco, CA. (For general location see Geological Survey map for California.) Existing project. Active authorized project provides for construction of a dam on East Fork of Russian River at Coyote Valley to a height of 160 feet; a dam on Dry Creek at Warm Springs to a height of 319 feet; and channel stabilization works on Russian River between mouth and mile 98, on lower reaches of several tributaries, and on Dry Creek downstream from dam. Project also provides for expansion of fish hatchery capacity at Dry Creek, Warm Springs, to compensate for fish losses on Russian River attributed to operation of Coyote Dam component of project. Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino), completed in 1959, is operated and maintained by the United States. (See tables 35-L and 35-M for latest approved estimated costs.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for Coyote Valley Dam and channel improvements accomplished to date. For the Dry Creek portion, local interests are required by the authorizing act to comply with the usual a., b., c. requirements for channel improvements and, in addition, prevent any encroachment in the channel of Dry Creek which would interfere with proper functioning of the channel improvement works; adjust all claims concerning water rights arising from the construction and operation of the improvements, including acquisition of water rights needed for preservation of fish and wildlife resources affected by the project; and reimburse the United States in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, for that part of the joint-use construction cost, (30.2 percent currently estimated at $103,760,000) and an ultimate 32.5 percent of the annual operation, maintenance, and replacement joint-use costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply. The estimated annual cost to local interests for maintenance of channel improvement works is $80,000. Sonoma County Water Agency (formerly Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District) provided assurances of willingness and ability to meet requirements by Resolutions No. DR 00793-1, September 25, 1961, No. DR 4770-1, December 17, 1962, and No. DR 45759, August 5, 1974, for Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel. By letter dated March 7, 1967, Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District further indicated their interest in optimization of the Dry Creek (Warm Springs) damsite to provide additional water supply storage. Reimbursement to the United States for Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel costs allocated to 212,000 acre-feet of water supply storage is specified in a water supply contract with the local sponsor approved in October 1982. Local interests have expended approximately $1,000,000 to provide partial flood protection in project area and have constructed facilities at an approximate cost of $20,000,000 to distribute water from the completed Coyote Valley reservoir. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Coyote Valley Dam: None. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel: Engineering activities continued. The Gualala Redwoods claim that their 35-20 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT access to Kelly Road was cut off by Corps project (Warm Springs) went to trial in October 1992. Judgement resulting was a cost of $3,162,000 to the Federal Government. Major items of contract work included: Completion of Liberty Glen wastewater system at fiscal year cost of $353,795 and initiation and completion of contaminated soil remediation, $83,000. Maintenance: Coyote Valley Dam: Operation and maintenance continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $14,327. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of East Fork Russian River at Coyote Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 110,305 acre-feet occurred on February 8, 1998. Maximum hourly inflow to reservoir was 8,803 cubic feet per second on February 3, 1998. Maximum release of 5,302 cubic feet per second occurred on February 13, 1998. During the year, 258,000 acre-feet was released for flood control, and 122,522 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel: Operation and maintenance continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Dry Creek at Warm Springs Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 343,289 acre-feet occurred February 9, 1998. Maximum hourly inflow to reservoir was 14,969 cubic feet per second on February 6, 1998. Maximum release of 5,572 cubic feet per second occurred February 11, 1998. During the year, 47,253 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Releases for flood control amounted to 278,200 acre-feet. Historical summary. Entire project, exclusive of recreation facilities at completed project (Lake Mendocino), is about 99 percent complete. Coyote Valley Dam, initiated November 1958, was completed April 1959 (cost $17,550,000, of which $11,952,000 was Federal; and $5,598,000 contributed). Work, including removal of slides resulting from storms in 1958, was completed April 1959. Bank stabilization work on Russian River near Geyserville was completed in 1957 and channel improvements in remaining reaches on Russian River and East Fork of Russian River were completed in 1974 (cost $2,483,900). In April 1982, responsibility was transferred to the Sacramento District. Warm Springs construction completions include fish hatchery in December 1980, project overlook in May 1981, reservoir clearing in July 1981, downstream stabilization sills in October 1981, dam closure in October 1982, spillway repair at Warm Springs Dam in September 1985, boat launching facilities, Phase I, in September 1985, Rockpile Road Upgrade, Yorty Creek Beach, and remedial work at Liberty Glen camping area in September 1990, fish hatchery expansion in September 1992, final control tower grouting, dam access road repair, spillway stabilization, fish hatchery emergency water supply in September 1993, and Liberty Glen wastewater system and contaminated soil remediation. Initial filling of Warm Springs reservoir was commenced on November 1, 1984. Responsibility for construction was transferred to Sacramento District in August 1983. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated at Coyote Valley Dam in fiscal year 1984. 25. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM Location. Rises in Trinity Mountains in north-central California, flows generally southerly about 374 miles and empties into Suisun Bay, an arm of San Francisco Bay at Collinsville, CA. Works covered by this improvement are on Sacramento River and tributaries from Collinsville to Shasta Dam, about mile 312. Drainage area above Rio Vista is 26,500 square miles (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area for Sacramento River and Upper Butte Basin; Flournoy and Fruto quadrangles for Black Butte Lake; and Tuscan Buttes, Tehama, Redding, and Hooker quadrangles for Table Mountain Lake.) Existing project. Improvement of Sacramento River and tributaries, from Collinsville to Shasta Dam was authorized as a unit of a comprehensive plan for flood control and other related purposes in Sacramento River Basin. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries, for flood control purposes: Enlargement of existing levees on Sacramento River between vicinity of Moulton weir and Ord Bend; construction of new levees from present levee terminus to vicinity of Chico Landing; construction of a weir near Chico Landing, extension of Moulton weir, and construction of a bypass through Upper Butte Basin; construction of new levees in Lower Butte Basin; enlargement of existing levees in Sutter, Tisdale, Sacramento, and Yolo Bypasses; and levee construction and/or channel enlargement on following minor tributaries of Sacramento River: Antelope Creek; Chico and Mud Creeks and Sandy Gulch; Butte and Little Chico Creeks; Cherokee Canal; Elder Creek; Deer Creek (Tehama County); Thomes 35-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Creek; and Willow Creek. Improvement provides for about 155 miles of channel improvement and about 294 miles of levees with an average height of 12 feet and a freeboard of 3 feet. Improvement also provides for revetment as required for protection of bypass levee slopes against erosion. Total first cost for project is $18,300,000 (October 1988), of which $11,900,000 is Federal, and $6,400,000 non-Federal for lands and damages, including relocations. (See table 35-N on project units classified and excluded from cost estimate.) (b) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff, CA: An extension of the existing Sacramento River Flood Control project which provides for construction of bank protection works and minor channel improvements as required on Sacramento River between Chico Landing and Red Bluff for flood control purposes. Estimated first cost (October 1987) for project work in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties is $31,000,000, of which $25,700,000 is Federal cost and $5,300,000 non-Federal cost for lands and damages including relocations and cash contribution of $3,435,000. (c) Sacramento River, CA, Bank Protection Project: Includes initial phase covering 430,000 lineal feet of bank protection and a second phase covering 405,000 lineal feet of bank protection under a long range program of bank protection, erosion control works, and setback levees at critical locations within limits of authorized or existing levees included in the Sacramento River Flood Control project to protect integrity of levee system for flood control purposes. Total estimated (October 1997) first cost for project is $249,400,000, (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) of which $179,900,000 is Federal and $69,500,000 non-Federal comprised of lands and damages including relocations $26,671,000 and required cash contribution $42,829,000 toward first cost. Total estimated cost for recreation facilities, $2,874,000 (includes both Federal and non-Federal). Construction in (a), (b), and (c) above supplements program of levee improvements as accomplished pursuant to 1917 Flood Control Act, as amended by subsequent acts, including 1941 Flood Control Act, and which are reported on page 35-3A under Sacramento River, CA, flood control. (d) Authorization also provided for Black Butte Lake. For description of completed project see Annual Report for 1975. Federal first cost for project is $14,508,820, including $475,507 for basic recreation facilities. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost for recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $1,000,162. A concessionaire at Black Butte Marina provided public use facilities in accordance with lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost to date of $87,000. (e) Authorization also provided for construction of Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) project, an earthfill dam on Sacramento River about 3 miles north of Red Bluff, CA. This project unit was deauthorized August 5, 1977. For details, see Annual Report for 1978. Local cooperation. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Fully complied with for all work completed or under contract, and local interests indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work as scheduled. Levee construction (107 miles) total requirement for the "active" project has been completed, transferred to, and accepted by the State. (b) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies; local interests must also assume responsibility for flood plain zoning. Fully complied with for portions completed in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties; completed work, bank protection at 36 sites, was transferred to and accepted by the State. (c) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests must also contribute an amount in cash that, when added to costs of lands, easements, rights-of-way and utility modifications, equals one-third of cost of each unit of remedial work; this contribution is estimated (October 1997) at $27,740,000. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Local interests must also contribute an amount in cash, that when added to the cost of lands easement, rights-of-way and utility modifications, equal one-quarter of each unit of remedial work; this contribution is estimated (October 1997) at $40,970,000, First phase mitigation equals thirty-seven percent for acquisition of land and establishment and maintenance of fish and wildlife habitat, this contribution is estimated (October 1997) at $790,000. Local interests fully complied with requirements for all work completed or under contract, and indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work as scheduled. In addition, for reaches where local interests request bank stabilization in lieu of more feasible levee setbacks, local interests will contribute costs over and above costs of setbacks, and provide local contribution. Completed units transferred to and accepted by the State. (d) Black Butte Lake: None required for construction. Local interests 35-22 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT must pay the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to the conservation functions of the project; these costs are estimated at 39.9 percent of first cost and 40.2 percent of annual costs. From March 2, 1960, to October 22, 1970, contract between the Bureau of Reclamation and the State of California provided for repayment of irrigation storage costs; Bureau administered contract in accordance with reclamation law. Local interests paid a total of $77,205 for irrigation services during this period. Public Law 502, 91st Cong., 2d sess., October 23, 1970, provided that Black Butte project be financially integrated with the Central Valley project, coordinated operationally with other Central Valley project storage units by the Bureau under the Secretary of the Interior, and that dam and reservoir at Black Butte be physically operated and maintained by the Corps in a manner compatible with recreational use of the reservoir. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries None. (b) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project Complete construction of Contract 40A, with a fiscal year cost of $675,000. Complete the first Lower American River construction contract 1A-2 with a fiscal year cost of $733,000. Lower American River construction contract was 1B awarded July 10, 1998 with a fiscal year cost of $563,772. Engineering and design activities continued. (See table 35-0 for construction accomplished and contract costs.) (c) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff. None. (d) Black Butte Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff above Black Butte Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 140,106 acre-feet occurred April 25, 1998. Maximum hourly inflow to Black Butte reservoir was 51,319 cubic feet per second on February 3, 1998, and maximum outflow of 15,618 cubic feet per second occurred on February 12, 1998. During the year, 904,000 acre-feet was released for flood control and 313,826 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. (e) Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) Lake: None. Historical summary. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries (active portions): Construction was initiated in May 1949 on Deer Creek and Butte Creek units; Cherokee Canal, Elder Creek, Chico and Mud Creeks, and Sandy Gulch units have been completed. Active portion of this improvement is about 99 percent complete. Work remaining is bypass levee revetment as required, which will accomplished under Sacramento River Bank Protection project. (b) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project: Construction of first unit was initiated in June 1963; initial phase of project was completed in November 1974. Phase II is underway, and overall project is about 91 percent complete. (c) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff: Active portion of project, bank protection in Tehama County, was initiated in June 1963 and completed in March 1964. Project was reopened in June 1968 to place additional necessary bank protection. Work at 36 sites was completed in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties as of September 1985 and transferred to State for maintenance. Bank protection on Sacramento River, Tehama Countyone site, mile 215, (Unit 5), was completed November 1982, two sites, mile 209.5 and mile 217.5, (Unit 6), were completed in November 1983, and four sites, 241.0, 237.9, 237.7, and 237.5 (Unit 7) were completed in February 1985. (d) Black Butte Lake: Construction began in March 1960 and project is complete. Final land acquisition was completed in December 1966. Construction of main dam was initiated in June 1960 and completed in December 1963. Dam has been operating since November 1962 to provide the flood protection for which it was designed. Final cost allocation approved May 3, 1977. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1980 and completed in FY 1986. Piezometer installation and slope for protection at dam were completed in FY 1983. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. (e) Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) Lake: Project unit deauthorized as of August 5, 1977. 26. SAN LORENZO, CA Location. Project is located within the city limits of Santa Cruz, CA, in Santa Cruz County, about 70 miles south of city of San Francisco and includes the lower 2.5 miles of San Lorenzo River which terminates at the Pacific Ocean. Existing Project. Flood control features of the authorized project consist of construction of 13,000 l.f. of levee embankment raise or floodwalls on top of various portions of the existing project levees on both sides of San Lorenzo River from the Southern Pacific Railroad bridge to Highway 1. Habitat restoration measures include revegetating the land-side slopes of the levees. The maximum flood of record occurred in 35-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 1955 which inundated 410 acres and caused damages of approximately $7.6 million. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 for flood control and habitat restoration purposes. Cost estimate (October 1998) is $17,600,00 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $13,230,000 is Federal cost and $4,370,000 is non-Federal cost. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities where necessary in construction of project; pay 10 percent of cost allocated to flood control to bring the total non-Federal share of costs to 25 percent, as determined under Section 103(m) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 to reflect the non- Federal sponsor's ability to pay as reduced for credit allowed based on prior work ($450,000 authorized under Section 215 of the Flood Control Act of 1968); pay 25 percent of costs allocated to nonstructural flood control; pay 25 percent of costs allocated to fish and wildlife habitat; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, and replacement. Local sponsor, City of Santa Cruz, expressed their continued support for project by letter dated October 8, 1997. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed October 15, 1998. Operations and results during fiscal year. Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1997 provided initial construction funds of $200,000. Engineering and design continued, including revisions of plans and specifications to incorporate habitat restoration features into project. Construction General funds were used for fiscal year costs of $820,000. Historical summary. A flood control project, consisting of levee and channel improvements, was completed in 1959 by the Corps of Engineers. The project was to provide a standard project flood level of protection (about a 200-year event). Since that time, excessive sediment deposition in the streambed has reduced the flood carrying capacity of the existing project. Sediment accumulation and the resultant peak flows during a flood event in January 1982 caused the river to flow near design capacity, even though the storm had a recurrence level of only approximately 25- years. As a result of the flood threat, the City of Santa Cruz and the Corps of Engineers initiated a feasibility study of the San Lorenzo River with the signing of a final Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement (FCSA) on August 18, 1989. Chief's Report was signed June 30, 1994. Preconstruction engineering and design phase was initiated in March 1994 and completed at a cost of $934,000. 27. UPPER JORDAN RIVER, UT Location. Project is located in Salt Lake County, Utah just south of Salt Lake City corporate limit. Existing Project. The project includes construction of a flood control diversion and sediment control structure on Mill Creek, a 1.4 mile underground conduit from the diversion structure to a detention basin, and construction of a 100 acre foot Hillview Detention Basin. The project will divert flood flows from Mill Creek to the detention basin and ultimately into Big Cottonwood Creek. The project will provide 100 year flood protection on Mill Creek above State Street. Local Cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights of way, and borrow and excavated or dredged material disposal areas. Modify or relocate utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities where necessary in the construction of the project. Pay 6 percent of the costs allocated to flood control and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation and replacement offlood control facilities. The non-Federal sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Salt Lake County will act as the local sponsor for the project. A Project Cooperation Agreement is pending completion of a limited reevaluation report (LRR) and required funding. Operations and results during fiscal year. PED was completed at a cost of $1,576,000. At the request of Salt Lake County, the design is being reevaluated to address potential downsizing of the diversion structure and other project features. Results of the reevaluation will be presented in the LRR. Historical Summary. A feasibility report was completed in 1987 and PED was completed in 35-24 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT December 1994. Funds were added in FY 1997 to initiate construction. There has been a long history of flooding which is most commonly associated with snowmelt. The most recent flooding occurred in 1982, 1983, and 1984. A General Design Memorandum (GDM) was approved in December 1994. A project Authorization Change (PAC) report was submitted in January 1996 to obtain Congressional reauthorization on a Section 902 (WRDA 86) new cost limit. The project was reauthorized in WRDA 96. 28. WALNUT CREEK, CA Location. Project is on Walnut Creek and lower reaches of its principal tributaries, Pacheco, Grayson, San Ramon, Las Trampas, Galindo, and Pine Creeks in Contra Costa County, CA. Improvement will extend from Suisun Bay to head of project about 1 mile above southern limits of city of Walnut Creek. City of Walnut Creek is about 10 miles south of Suisun Bay. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Comprises extension of existing levees, construction of new levees and concrete channels, channel rectification and enlargement, and utilization of improvements constructed or planned by local interests. Plan provides for about 21.8 miles of channel improvement, two reinforced-concrete drop structures, two stilling basins, and 13.8 miles of levees. Cost estimate (October 1996) is $97,100,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $71,900,000 is Federal cost and $25,200,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $19,360,000 for lands and damages and relocations except railroad facilities, and $5,840,000 required cash contribution for land enhancement benefits provided by the project). Local interests have expended about $3 million for flood control in the project area during the period 1955-1965, including the concrete conduits constructed through the city of Walnut Creek at an estimated cost of $1,000,000 considered a preproject condition to be incorporated in the Corps project. In addition, local developers have made channel improvements for Upper Pine Creek valued at $5,050,000. The cost thereof is not included in above costs of local cooperation. Improvement adopted by 1960 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 76, 86th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies, except that relocation of railroad facilities is a Federal responsibility. In addition, local interests must make a cash contribution to the United States, in amount of 7.4 percent of cost of construction for land enhancement benefits provided by project. Cash contribution is estimated (October 1992) at $5,840,000. Local interests are represented by Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District; formal assurances, including evidence of financial and legal ability to fulfill requirement for the cash contribution, were accepted by the Sacramento District Engineer on November 15, 1963. The Flood Control District furnished all rights-of-way required to date and indicated that it will furnish all requirements as needed for future construction. The Flood Control District arrange d for highway bridge modifications and utility relocations before start of work by the Corps contractor. Payment of required contributed funds will be made in installments in amounts equal to 7.4 percent ofthe estimated construction expenditure for each fiscal year. Flood Control District and city of Walnut Creek requested that recreation be added as a project purpose and will share costs in accordance with Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Post Authorization Change for recreation was approved July 27, 1987. In 1995, the city of Walnut Creek, decided not to proceed with the recreation project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Historical summary. Construction was initiated June 1964; project is about 98 percent complete. Total of 17.7 miles of channel improvement, 9.2 miles of levee construction, part of channel improvement landscaping, Drop Structures No. 1 and 2 and construction under San Ramon Bypass Contract No. 1, Contract No. 2 and Contract No. 3 and Upper Pine Creek Channel contact have been transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Due to difficulties with Contract No. 1 part of the contract work was completed under Contract No. 1A with a different contractor. A contract for remedial work on San Ramon Bypass Contract No. 2 channel cover was completed in August 1993. The 9-acre mitigation contract was completed in June 1993. Work remaining consists of completion of erosion control mitigation (8-acre). 35-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Construction responsibility was transferred from San Francisco District on April 1, 1982. 29. WEST SACRAMENTO, CA Location. Project is located in West Sacramento, Yolo County, in north-central California. Existing Project. Project consists of raising 4.9 miles of levees up to 5.0 feet along the Sacramento and Yolo Bypasses; constructing 0.9 miles of slurry cut-off wall approximately 50 feet deep at the waterside toe along the east levee of the Yolo Bypass extending into the south levee of the Sacramento Bypass; constructing concrete wing walls with stop logs at the Union Pacific Railroad; constructing a concrete wing wall and flow cut-off wall on each side of Interstate 80; and developing approximately 40 acres of mitigation lands for riparian and upland habitat loss. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1992. Project was reauthorized by the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1999 (P.L. 105-245) at a total cost of $32,900,000 with an estimated first Federal cost of $24,700,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $8,200,000 (October 1998 price level). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities where necessary in construction of project; pay 16 percent of cost allocated to flood control to bring the total non-Federal share of costs to 25 percent, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, and replacement of flood control facilities. The non-Federal sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) with the local sponsor, the California State Reclamation Board, was executed in May 1996. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design continued, including revisions of plans and specifications. First construction contract in the amount of $5,217,225 was awarded June 19, 1998. Fiscal year costs were $2,931,338 (Federal) and $158,190 (non-Federal contributed funds). Historical summary. Funds were appropriated in FY 1992 to initiate preconstruction engineering and design (PED) for the combined American River Watershed and Sacramento Metropolitan studies. The two projects were separated when WRDA 92 authorized the West Sacramento Project (Sacramento Metropolitan) independently of the American River Watershed Project. Funds to initiate construction for the West Sacramento Project were appropriated in FY 1995. Design Memorandum was approved in March 1996. PED was completed at a cost of $1,847,000. 30. WILDCAT AND SAN PABLO CREEKS, CA Location. Project is located in vicinity of San Pablo and Richmond, Contra Costa County, CA, about 20 miles northeast of San Francisco, CA. Existing project. Current plan of improvement reflects only Reach 1, which is from San Pablo Bay to AT&SF Railroad tracks on both Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks; Reach 1 consists of 9,900 lineal feet of channel improvements on Wildcat Creek and 10,000 lineal feet of channel improvements on San Pablo Creek. Improvements include channel deepening, levees, stilling basins, and flow control weirs. Additionally, about 20 acres will be planted for mitigation of fish and wildlife. Reach 2, which is upstream of AT&SF Railroad tracks and consists of 9,400 lineal feet of channel and levee work on Wildcat Creek, 1,800 lineal feet of channel and levee work on San Pablo Creek, and mitigation for fish and wildlife on 8 acres, was determined to be economically infeasible, excluded from total project cost, and reclassified as inactive. Project also includes recreation features on Wildcat Creek. Approved estimated cost of new work (1996) is $35,200,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $20,200,000 is Federal cost, and $15,000,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $1,593,000 cash contribution). Improvements adopted by House and Senate Public Works Committee Resolutions June 9 and 15, 1976, respectively, under provisions of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965 (H. Doc. 511, 94th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map).For details on units, see Annual Report for 1968. 35-26 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT Local cooperation. In accordance with cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights of way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of project; pay one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation facilities; pay 5 percent of the costs allocated to flood control and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County by Resolution 73-466, June 25, 1973, agreed to assume obligations of local cooperation. On November 9, 1976, the Board reaffirmed sponsorship by Resolution 76-960. Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Board of Supervisors formed an Assessment District, August 3, 1982, which assures availability of funds for local share of non-Federal portion of flood control project costs for a modified plan of improvement. A flood control Local Cooperation Agreement satisfying all requirements of Sec. 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-661) and consistent with the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662), was executed on June 20, 1986 between the Department of the Army and the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. By Resolution No. 1985-1235 1, adopted December 17, 1985, the East Bay Regional Park and Recreation District stated support for development of trail and recreational improvements for the project and indicated its intent to share in 50 percent of the cost of such improvements and perform operation and maintenance responsibility. A recreation Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army on April 15, 1992. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and construction continued. Historical summary. Contact 3C completed. Local interests withdrew support of project in 1979. Project responsibility was transferred from San Francisco District on April 1, 1982. After 1982-1983 floods, local interests again indicated support of the project, and in October 1983, project work was resumed by Sacramento District. A revised final environmental impact statement was filed March 28, 1986, and a General Design Memorandum was approved May 29, 1986. Flood Control Local Cooperation Agreement was executed June 20, 1986. Recreation Design Memorandum was approved on February 19, 1992, and the recreation LCA was signed on April 15, 1992. Construction work under Contract No. 1 and Contract No. 2 for Reach No. 1 of Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks has been transferred to local sponsor for operation and maintenance. In March 1990, Reach 2 was declared infeasible and is now inactive. All costs have been deleted from project cost estimate. Flood control construction of the project is about 100 percent complete. Final accounting of project is underway. Recreation features are 50 percent complete. 31. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Approved regulations for operation and maintenance of flood control works, part 208, title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, provide for inspection of completed projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance to determine status of project and insure compliance with regulations. During fiscal year, inspections were made of: Completed units of Fairfield Vicinity Streams; completed units of Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries; completed units of Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff; completed units of Sacramento River flood control project, Kings River Channel Improvement (Pine Flat Lake project), and Walnut Creek project; American River levees; Merced County Stream group; Middle Creek (Lake County); Chester, North Fork Feather River; levee and channel improvements on Chowchilla River (Buchanan project) and Fresno River (Hidden project); Duck Creek diversion, Green Valley Creek, Littlejohn Creek, Mormon Slough, Bear Creek, Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, and North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, all in California; Truckee River, CA and NV; completed units of lower San Joaquin River and tributaries, CA; completed units of Red Bank and Fancher Creeks including Big Dry Creek Dam and diversion, and Fancher Dam and Redbank, Alluvial Drain and Pup Creek detention basins, CA; Reese River, Battle Mountain, NV; Sevier River, Redmond and vicinity, Jordan River, Big Wash near Milford, and Kays Creek, all in Utah; various 35-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 emergency flood control works under authority of Sec. 208, Flood Control Act of June 30, 1948, and September 3, 1954; Public Law 99, June 28, 1955, and antecedent legislation; and Sec. 14 of Flood Control Act of July 24, 1946. Maintenance inspections conducted indicate that existing agreements and regulations are being complied with on completed flood control works. Continuing effort is required to improve maintenance practices and active steps are being taken by responsible State and local agencies to achieve desired results. Local agencies were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain these projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. Total cost of inspection for fiscal year of $574,003 included continuation of dam safety assurance program for Folsom Lake, CA for $269,274. 32. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). Costs for preauthorization studies for fiscal year were $1,100,932. See Table 35-P for list of studies. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration activities pursuant to sec 206, Public Law 3 0 3 ,1 0 4 th Congress. Cost for studies for fiscal year were $439,899. See Table Q for list of studies. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal cost for fiscal year was $63,531,972, $357,295 was for disaster preparedness and $63,174,677 for emergency flood repairs. Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.). Federal cost for fiscal year was $8,800,680, $8,770,836 was for emergency operations and $29,844 for emergency streambank and shoreline protection. Snagging and clearing navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (Sec. 208,1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83d Cong.). Federal cost for fiscal year was $109,106 all of which was used for snagging and clearing activities. See Table R for list of studies. Flood insurance activities (Sec. 1301-1377, 1968 Housing and Urban Development Act, Public Law 90-448 as amended). In coordination with flood control activities, four flood insurance studies were continued. Inter-Agency Agreements EMW-96-1A-0294, EMW-96-1A-0195- FEMA, EMW-96-IA-0195, and EMW-97-IA-0140, at a fiscal year cost of $289,340 under Federal Emergency Management Agency reimbursable order. 33. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with sec. 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, summaries of monthly reservoir operations at Big Dry Creek, Boca, Camanche, Del Valle, Folsom, Friant (Millerton Lake), Indian Valley, Los Banos Detention, New Bullards Bar, New Don Pedro, New Exchequer (Lake McClure), New Melones, Oroville, Prosser, Shasta, and Stampede, CA; East Canyon, Echo, Jordanelle, Little Dell, Lost Creek, Pineview, Red Fleet, Starvation, and Wanship, UT; and Blue Mesa, Lemon, Paonia, Ridgway, and Vallecito, CO, were prepared. No water control manual revisions were completed due to environmental issues. Corps personnel provided advice Sec. 7 as requested during flood control operations at all c. 7 reservoirs. Fiscal year cost was $1,376,497. Total cost to September 30, 1998, was $11,232,085. Multiple-Purpose Projects including Power 34. NEW MELONES LAKE, CA Location. On Stanislaus River about three-quarters mile downstream from existing Melones Dam and about 35 miles northeast of city of Modesto. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of the area.). Existing project. Provides for construction of (a) an 35-28 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT earth and rockfill dam about 625 feet high to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of about 2,400,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, power, general recreation, fish and wildlife, and other purposes, and (b) a powerplant below the dam with an installed capacity of 300,000 kilowatts. Upon completion of construction of dam and powerplant by the Corps, the project became an integral part of Central Valley project and is being operated and maintained by the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to Federal reclamation laws, except that the flood control operation of the project shall be in accordance with rules and regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Maintenance of Stanislaus River channel from Goodwin Dam to San Joaquin River to a capacity of at least 8,000 cubic feet per second will also be Corps responsibility. Estimated (October 1996 price level) Federal cost is $402,000,000. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. In addition, local interests expended $300,000 for levees along lower reaches of Stanislaus River. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 453, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). This act modified original authorization adopted by 1944 Flood Control Act. (H. Flood Control Committee Doc. 2, 78th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) The 1944 Flood Control act established $8 million monetary limitation for partial accomplishment ofproject. Further monetary authorizations of $2.5 million, $5 million, $13 million, $2 million, $17 million, $18 million, $44 million, $83 million, $46 million, $6 million, and $61 million were provided for this project by Public Laws 235 and 780, 83d Cong., and 85-500, 90-17, 90-483, 91-282, 92-222, 93-251, 94-397, 95-104, and 95-189, making a total monetary authorization of $305,500,000 available for the basin plan comprising Lower San Joaquin River and tributaries, including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, CA. Since FY 1979, appropriations have not been subject to the river basin monetary limitation. Local cooperation. Based on approved preliminary cost allocation studies (July 1965) local interests will be required to pay 35.2 percent of first cost and 12.7 percent of annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation. In addition, 31.1 percent of first cost and 62.5 percent of annual cost would be allocated to power. Local interests must also maintain existing private levees along Stanislaus River from Goodwin Dam to San Joaquin River and prevent encroachment on channel and floodway between levees to preserve safe carrying capacity throughout the reach of at least 8,000 cubic feet per second. Recovery of costs allocated to irrigation and power will be the responsibility of the Bureau of Reclamation. Reimbursement of costs will be in accordance with Bureau policies and procedures for the Central Valley project. State of California officially adopted project by chapter 918 of statutes of 1963, and by chapter 1438 of those statutes authorized State Reclamation Board to furnish required assurances. The Board, by letter dated December 13, 1963, stated it would furnish required assurances when formally requested to do so. Assurances were requested by letter of December 30, 1977. On October 2, 1979, the Board reaffirmed its intent to furnish the required assurances. On January 6, 1983, the Board provided formal assurances of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Project close-out and flowage easement acquisition along the Lower Stanislaus River were continued. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued on Lower Stanislaus River. Historical summary. Construction was initiated in August 1966. Main dam contract which was awarded in March 1974 has been completed; dam dedication ceremonies were held July 14, 1979. Cultural resources preservation, water intake facilities, flood control and irrigation tailrace modification, reservoir area clearing, Tuttletown Phase I recreation area, Oakdale recreation, Glory Hole Phase I and Phase II recreation area, and operations access road contracts have all been completed. Glory Hole minimal recreation facilities contract has been completed. Boundary fencing, Lower Stanislaus Phase I and Phase II minimal recreation facilities, Lower Stanislaus Corporation Yard, and Lower Stanislaus Administration Building contracts have been completed. Tuttletown minimal recreation facilities, McHenry recreation area, Tuttletown wastewater treatment, Knights Ferry recreation area, Knights Ferry Covered Bridge, Glory Hole recreation area sanitary system, Two-Mile Bar recreation, administration building, and Glory Hole recreation area force main contracts have been completed. Parrotts Ferry Bridge modification (Nov 93), Widening Highway 49 Intersection (Aug 94); Tuttletown Recreation Campgrounds, and Tuttletown and Glory 35-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Hole Improvement (Jan 94) have been completed. Remaining recreation facilities were unscheduled pending development of cost sharing agreements and/or specific Congressional appropriation of funds. A Memorandum of Understanding between the Department of the Interior and the Department of the Army transferring the New Melones dam and reservoir from the Corps of Engineers to the Bureau of Reclamation was executed on November 20, 1979. Agreement provides that the Corps complete land acquisition actions and retain budgeting, design, and construction responsibility for reservoir clearing and recreation development; completion of cultural resources mitigation in project area was vested in the Department of the Interior. The California State Water Resources Control Board's Decision 1422 of April 1973 established conditions which impacted on the planned filling and operation of the project by the Department of the Interior. As a result, the Department of Interior brought suit against the State of California claiming State limitations on project operation were contrary to Congressional intent and authority. The case was heard before the U.S. District Court in Fresno, CA, and in early March 1981, a Federal judge ruled that the Federal Government could fill the New Melones reservoir for purpose of generating electrical power, but not for agricultural or other purposes. Both the Government and the California State Resources Control Board appealed this decision to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, CA. On December 20, 1982, the Court upheld all 25 requirements placed on the Federal Government by the State Water Resources Control Board. The decision reversed the lower court's decision to permit filling of the reservoir for generating electrical power. The Bureau of Reclamation subsequently filed for a permit from the State Water Resources Control Board to fill the reservoir. Permit was approved. The Bureau had originally started generating power on a limited basis on July 1, 1979; however, after the filling of the reservoir in spring of 1983, full power generating benefits have been attained. Project is about 99.9 percent complete. General Investigations 35. SURVEYS 36. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Technical assistance was performed for other Federal agencies as well as non-Federal agencies in connection with Flood Plain Management Services Program at fiscal year costs of $273,639. No Flood Plain Information Studies were prepared after FY 1980. Fiscal year costs for hydrologic studies were $31,507. 37. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT The Hydrologic Engineering Center was designated as a separate Field Operating Agency as of January 1, 1979, in accordance with OCE permanent'orders 1-1, January 10, 1979, but Sacramento District is continuing to provide advisory and administrative support services to HEC as specified in local support agreement DACW05-79-A-0038 of March 1979. Fiscal year costs were $1,290,182, of which $75,424 was for collection and study of basic data (including flood plain management service), $1,214,758 was for research and development, and $1,239,535 was for operation and maintenance activities. 38. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED, CA (COMPREHENSIVE PLAN) The project is located in Placer, El Dorado, and Sacramento Counties on the North, Middle and South Forks of the American River and along the lower American River and Sacramento Rivers. Recent evaluations indicate that the level of flood protection along much of the American River and in the Natomas area is less than the 100-year level. The Supplemental Information Report (SIR) was completed in March 1996 as directed by the Defense Appropriations act for FY 1993. The Chief of Engineer's Report recommended implementation of elements common to the final candidate plans See Table 35-S. 35-30 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT presented in the SIR. These "common elements", were authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1996. Other alternatives addressed in the SIR include: Folsom outlet modifications, Folsom Dam raising, downstream levee raising along the American and Sacramento Rivers, and upstream storage. Efforts are being continued to define plans for alternatives leading to higher levels of flood protection for the Sacramento area and vicinity. The Feasibility Report for the American River Watershed Investigation was completed in December 1991 and the Division Engineer's Report was issued in February 1992. Funds were appropriated in FY 1992 to initiate preconstruction engineering and design (PED) for the combined American River Watershed and Sacramento Metropolitan studies. The two projects were separated when WRDA 92 authorized the American River Watershed Project independently of the West Sacramento Project (Sacramento Metropolitan). Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $30,000,000. TRUCKEE MEADOWS, NV Project is located in metropolitan area of Reno and Sparks in Washoe County, NV. Current plan of improvement consists of about 7 miles of levees, 5 miles of floodwalls, 3 bridge replacements along Truckee River and includes limited channel excavation, a detention dam on Steamboat Creek at Huffaker Narrows, and backwater levees along Steamboat Creek, Boynton Slough, and the North Truckee Drain just north of the Interstate Highway 80 crossing. Plan also includes recreation facilities with bicycle and pedestrian paths, river overlooks, and picnic sites; mitigation measures (31 acres of riparian plantings to replace vegetation losses); and fish and wildlife features. Project will provide flood protection from Truckee River to cities of Reno and Sparks and Truckee Meadows urban areas. Project was deferred and preconstruction planning had been terminated as project is economically infeasible. Coordination with local agencies and sponsors was continued. Flooding remains an issue and locals requested a review of the project. A reconnaissance study is reassessing the flood control needs. NAPA RIVER, CA Project is located in city and county of Napa, CA. Current plan of improvement consists of geomorphic channel design setback, floodwalls and levees, training dike, a dry bypass channel, and related environmental mitigation measures. The improvements on Napa River would extend about 7 miles, from Trancas Street to Highway 29. Approximately one mile of Napa Creek, from the confluence of Jefferson, would be improved to increase flood protection. The project will provide 100-year level of flood protection from Napa River and Napa Creek to city of Napa. A hazardous, toxic and radioactive waste preliminary evaluation was conducted. The Final Supplemental General Design Memorandum and Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report were completed in October 1998. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $15,000,000. 39. OTHER WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITY VIC FAZIO WILDLIFE AREA, CA (the project previously known as) YOLO BASIN WETLANDS, SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA (Section 1135) Project Modification for Improvement of Environment Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act. 1999, Sec 508 changed the project name from "Yolo Basin Wetlands" to "Vic Fazio Yolo Wildlife Area" The Yolo Basin Wetlands area is primarily located within the boundaries of the Yolo Bypass, an operative feature of the Sacramento River Flood Control Project. Yolo Bypass extends 43 miles from Fremont Weir on the Sacramento River, south to the town of Rio Vista where it rejoins the river. 35-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Project includes restoration of wetlands and contributes to a larger program now in the planning stage, proposed by an interagency group of state and local governments and organizations. Yolo Basin Wetlands work includes physical improvements to help create a mixture of native marsh, permanent and seasonal wetlands, and riparian forest through modification of existing drainage canals or construction of small dikes and weirs to redirect available water sources to proposed wetland areas. Also to be included is preparation of a flood plain hydraulic management model to assess hydraulic impacts of wetland projects proposed in the Yolo Bypass and construction of an administrative and maintenance facility. Estimated project cost is $17,194,000. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986, Public Law 99-662, Sec. 1135(b), as amended by Sec. 304 of WRDA 1990. The California State Department of Fish and Game is the project sponsor for 3,480 acres located within the Yolo Bypass. A Project Modification Report and an Environmental Assessment/Initial Study were completed in April 1992. Three existing sites have been identified for wetlands restoration: Putah Creek Sink (3,000 acres), Yolo Causeway (182 acres) and Willow Slough Bypass (345 acres). Willow Slough Bypass site was later withdrawn due to difficulty in acquiring lands. A flood plain hydraulic management model was continued. Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) for Putah Creek Sink site was executed on December 23, 1993. Fiscal year costs were $502,112. YOLO WETLANDS BASIN, DAVIS SITE, SACRAMENTO, CA (Section 1135) Project Modification for Improvement of Environment Project is located contiguous to boundaries of Yolo Bypass and Willow Slough Bypass, which is a leveed tributary of Sacramento River on west side of Yolo Bypass. Yolo Bypass and Willow Slough Bypass are operative features of the Sacramento River Flood Control Project. Project will include a 396-acre site that consists of 212 acres of permanent wetland, 64 acres of riparian woodland, 64 acres of grassland/upland, and 56 acres of seasonal wetland, dikes, roads, gates, ponds and islands. Water for wetlands site is available from City of Davis waste water treatment plant and from its storm drain system. Estimated project cost is $6,000,000. A previous Davis site was included under Yolo Basin Wetlands, Sacramento River project, but was with drawn for consideration by local sponsor due to difficulty in obtaining lands. Current project is proceeding under authority of Sec. 1135(b) of Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986. Fiscal year costs were $1,330,490. 35-32 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT TABLE 35-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep 30 1998 1. Sacramento River CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds. Other) 2. Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, CA (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 3. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels 4. San Joaquin River, CA New Work Approp. - Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - - - 40,331,192 1 - - - - 40,331,192 1 558,000 1,454,000 2,167,000 5,139,100 56,267,678 2 520,153 1,535,679 2,145,480 3,652,774 54,747,935 3 85,000 4 - 92,000 -50,000 32,785 23,158 18,947 -170,000 22,270 - 30,000 14,196 6,316 - 7,759,474 s 1,912 7,737,668 - 2,610,000 310 2,582,699 15,000 14,578 1,300,000 1,019,962 100,000 62,622 22,000 64,671,000 6 18,236 64,170,519 7 - - - - 5,833,117 8 - - - - 5,833,117 9 1,162,000 762,000 5,293,000 4,260,000 26,744,382 1,216,824 822,849 5,252,863 3,002,393 26,205,727 5. American River New Work Watershed Approp (Common Elements) Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 5,828,000 5,828,000 4,104,812 4,104,812 1,325,000 1,325,000 167,572 167,572 35-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 6. Buchanan Dam- H.V. Eastman Lake Chowchilla River, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds. Other) 7. Cache Creek Settling Basin, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 8. Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek and Tributaries including New Hogan Lake & Farnington Dam. CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 9. Colorado River at New Work Great Junction, CO Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost New Work (Required Contrib. Contrib. Funds) Cost - - - - 27,369,597 - - - - 27,369,597 1,525,000 1,413,000 1,314,000 1,463,000 22,249,393 1,464,048 1,527,612 1,310,283 1,276,810 22,,043,837 - - - - 111,187 to0 - - - - 111,187 10 -235,000 3,550,000 -150,000 -245,384 566,356 2,921,834 - 180,000 - 6,389 3,500 161,564 - 13,611,000 3,500 13,608,917 120,000 1,279,000 32,400 1,140,700 - - - - 724,000 11 - - - - 676,755 12 - - - - 23,723,144 13 - - - - 23,723,144 13 1,766,000 1,882,500 1,834,000 4,453,000 36,556,611 14 1,781,777 1,561,355 1,830,517 3,951,498 35,612,515 14 101,700 1,499,951 15 16 39,046 1,437,297 15 17 456,700 446,400 373,358 253,407 203,594 - -23,566 - 9,910 38,802 55,856 908,100 869,161 79,484 65,766 10. Corte Madera Creek, CA (Federal Funds) New Work Approp. Cost 2,325 7,276 12,458,725 is 5,113 12,451,883 18 35-34 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep 30 1998 (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 12. Fairfield Vicinity Streams, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 13. Guadalupe River, CA (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 14. Hidden Dam - Hensley Lake, Fresno River, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds. Other) 15. Isabella Lake, Kern River, CA (Federal Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. 190,355 19 190,213 19 804,761 20 804,761 20 -35,000 -40,088 59,012 59,016 -4,979 16,894 5,036 - 14,744,000 1,255 14,716,289 592,382 592,381 3,779,000 21 3,770,497 22 6,073,000 7,428,000 -403,000 1,844,000 39,119,000 2,499,041 4,719,421 2,781,245 2,767,767 32,718,629 -291,080 2,299,000 690,000 2,004,712 2,519,808 670,259 3,147,640 142,000 170,000 2,310,761 907,965 284,000 - 5,986,920 124,797 5,406,132 - 4,089,640 23 104,222 3,952,100 24 - - - - 30,555,426 - - - - 30,555,426 1,624,000 1,600,300 1,593,000 2,716,000 24,754,818 1,534,064 1,727,862 1,,541,262 2,426,012 24,408,684 - - - - 165,112 25 - - - - 165,112 25 - - - - 24,450,537 26 - - - - 24,450,537 26 673,000 1,047,200 1,372,455 5,167,000 45,919,717 27 28 35-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 Contrib. Funds, Other) Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 16. Kaweah and Tule New Work Rivers including Approp. Terminus Dam and Cost Success Lake, CA Maint. (Federal Funds) Approp. (Contrib. Funds, Other) Cost New Work 633,458 952,773 1,087,352 5,443,327 45,763,914 2728 -2,122 753,000 29 269 747,718 30 - - - - 34,997,230 31 - - - - 34,997,230 31 4,253,000 4,270,700 3,727,000 3,530,000 56,700,574 32 3,487,774 4,695,841 3,761,806 3,198,416 56,211,958 32 Contrib. Cost 353 633,420 33 34 632,695 33 35 17. Little Dell Lake, UT (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 18. Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek, NV, and CA 19. Merced County Streams, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds Other) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 500,000 1,010,000 3,213,000 1,014,000 41,336,900 723,860 1,391,999 2,513,831 1,883,994 41,149,164 480,000 474,500 356,950 769,610 - - 19,954,500 36,172 108,704 19,749,052 - - - - 4,300,147 36 - - - - 4,300,147 37 - - - - 8,504,989 38 - - - - 8,504,989 38 629,000 443,000 506,000 471,000 8,273,383 648,017 459,909 493,233 365,486 8,151,543 599,000 422,000 497,000 1,734,000 19,921,000 463,374 608,354 451,434 1,573,751 19,668,828 - - 104,505 285,272 40,000 109,545 65,590 39,909 250,636 84,712 614,505 594,712 -64,000 4,719,938 39 40 12,150 4,643,629 3940 35-36 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep 30 1998 20. Merced County Stream Group, CA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 2,751,259 41 2,751,259 41 146,000 100,500 230,000 237,000 3,175,340 176,222 130,403 205,951 118,890 3,032,558 21. Pajaro River Basin New Work CA (Federal Funds) Approp. (Required Contrib. Fund 22. Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, CA (Federal Fund) (Contrib. Funds, Other) Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost - 480,000 1,930 480,317 8,686,968 42 179 8,686,967 42 37,250 43 37,250 44 - - - - 43,356,265 45 - - - - 43,356,265 45 4,125,764 2,997,000 2,999,000 2,361,000 45,008,046 46 3,996,316 3,065,477 3,104,571 2,247,942 44,846,021 46 - - - - 110,000 47 - - - - 110,000 47 23. Redbank and New Work Fancher Creeks, CA Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost (Required Contrib. New Work Funds) Contrib Cost (Contrib. Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 450,000 550,000 -90,000 549,457 433,457 62,466 3,920 100,000 -5,190 43,474 -3,900 - 3,312 -4,020 - 47,516,065 48 7,677 47,507,148 48 - 3,354,920 15,271 3,328,631 - 759,580 49 - 701,546 24. Russian River Basin, CA, Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino) and Channel Improvements (Federal Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost 14,435,869 50 14,435,869 50 44,777,546 5152 44,777,546 5152 2,516,000 2,692,600 -251,978 2,407,709 2,877,136 -240,208 35-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep 30 1998 (Contrib. Funds, Other) Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Improvements, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrb. Funds, Other) 25. Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA from Collinsville to Shasta Dam (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 26. San Lorenzo, CA (Federal Funds) 27. Upper Jordan UT 28. Walnut Creek, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 589,911 53 570,774 54 741,000 85,000 90,000 889,811 124,582 37,063 3,284,000 3,338,900 -279,391 2,236,709 3,409,978 -268,282 - 333,198,645 ss 67,617 333,186,453 ss - 32,915,552 56 - 31,836,635 57 - 230,574 58 - 228,732 59 3,900,000 3,251,000 4,870,000 4,315,000 140,960,000 6061 3,434,929 2,901,135 5,478,886 3,216,875 139,281,549 60 1,649,000 1,738,000 1,600,000 1,448,000 30,607,128 62 1,623,025 1,782,894 1,600,525 1,355,079 30,499,646 62 190,000 1,225,950 1,350,000 442,500 27,366,854 707,149 774,787 1,214,896 768,924 26,832,759 5,500 5,533 6,000 2,024 2,927,796 6364 1,337 2,925,131 636465 200,000 1,194,000 1,394,000 123,699 820,003 943,702 500,000 103,000 149,865 109,046 - - 100,000 -67,615 70,899 47,659 - 70,791 -16,800 7,904 70,791 212,900 66,058 603,000 258,911 - 71,492,430 66 45,505 71,484,010 67 - 5,683,472 68 8,304 5,677,766 69 14,783,553 70 14,783,553 70 29. West Sacramento New Work 35-38 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep 30 1998 CA Approp. 500,000 499,000 209,000 6,944,000 8,152,000 (Federal Funds) Cost 473,664 422,983 308,824 2,931,333 4,136,809 (Required Contrib New Work Funds) Approp - - 1,020,000 300,000 1,320,000 Cost - - 147,589 158,191 467,015 30. Wildcat and San New Work Pablo Creeks, CA Approp. 4,057,000 637,000 -100,000 - 20,373,000 (Federal Funds) Cost 2,978,994 1,476,552 179,737 11,245 20,372,073 (Required Contrib. New Work Funds) Contrib. 485,000 235,338 - - 1,620,000 Cost 399,235 270,875 15,102 11,496 1,585,022 (Contrib. Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. 170,000 141,000 - - 1,937,000 71 Cost 65,000 257,042 2,518 - 1,906,943 72 34. Lower San New Work Joaquin River Approp. 150,000 - - - 372,790,379 73 74 and Tributaries, Cost 706,876 81,618 - - 371,059,615 74 CA including Maint Tuolumne and Approp. 1,079,000 980,400 1,182,000 3,001,000 14,850,716 Stanislaus Rivers, Cost 1,087,982 1,025,681 1,163,364 1,366,453 13,181,882 CA, New Melones Lake, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. - - - - 80,000 75 Cost - - - - 80,000 75 1. Includes the following amounts for new work: Regular Funds: Previous project, $185,198; existing project, $585,436 for shallow-draft and $39,650,558 for deep-draft. 2. Includes the following funds for maintenance: Regular Funds: Previous project, $553,720; existing project, $17,026,432 for shallow-draft and $38,617,526 for deep-draft; and deferred maintenance funds, $70,000 for shallow -draft. 3. Includes the following costs for maintenance: Regular Funds: Previous project, $553,720; existing project, $17,005,354 for shallow-draft and $37,118,861 for deep-draft; and deferred maintenance funds, $70,000 for shallow draft. 4. Includes $85,000 contributed funds, other, from Sacramento-Yolo Port District for clearing and grubbing on dredged material deposit areas to be used on ship channel maintenance dredging work. 5. Includes unobligated carryover for continuation of planing and engineering (CP&E) funds as of September 30, 1985 ($33,474) for Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel to be included in project cost (for cost sharing) per TWX of September 9, 1985. 6. Includes $28,326,800 funds for Sacramento District. 7. Includes $28,298,863 costs for Sacramento District. 8. Includes $1,158,348 public work funds, of which $207,198 was for work done along 30-foot channel in Suisun Bay Channel; excludes $19,000 expended for engineering for inactive portion of 1950 modification. In addition, $1,342,500 was expended from required contributed funds. 9. In addition, $1,250 was expended from required 35-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT contributed funds for maintenance. 10. Contributed funds, other, from State of California for design and construction of downstream channel improvements on Ash and Berenda Sloughs below Buchanan Dam. 11. Includes $724,000 contributed funds, other, from State of California for relocation activities including demolition or salvage of various pipes and facilities, constriction of ramps, turnouts, pipe gates and bank protection at Cache Creek Settling Basin. 12. Includes $676,755 contributed funds, other, costs for relocation activities for State of California. 13. Includes code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities at New Hogan lake: total to date $897,742. 14. Includes $99,000 special recreation use fees and costs at New Hogan Lake, and $826,600 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs (96X5125) at New Hogan Lake beginning in FY 1988. 15. For miscellaneous construction under local cooperation requirements, primarily for Bear Creek, San Joaquin County; includes $108,056 as related to Duck and Littlejohn Creeks channel improvements as part of Farmington Dam project unit. 16. Includes $393,195 contributed funds, other from California Department of Boating and Waterways for design and construction of boat launching and related facilities, and $30,000 for design and construction of a boarding float at North Shore recreation area at New Hogan Lake. 17. Includes $104,000 contributed funds, other, and costs from Calaveras County Water District for New Hogan hydropower studies. 18. Includes $6,999,725 San Francisco District construction funds and costs for Corte Madera Creek. 19. $8,695 contributed funds transferred to Sacramento District in FY 1983. Includes $97,400 San Francisco District required contributed funds and costs. 20. Contributed funds, other, and costs, from Marin County including $536,921 for miscellaneous bridge and road relocations and $267,840 for additional expenses for disposal sites at Corte Madera Creek. 21. Includes $3,643,000 contributed funds, other, from the State of California for relocation (automotive type bridge) at Laurel Creek Diversion near Fairfield, $113,000 from City of Fairfield for Phase III contract for channel development on Laurel Creek, and $23,000 from City of Suisun for Phase IIA contract for widening of Railroad Avenue 22. Includes $3,638,022 contributed funds, other costs for relocations at Laurel Creek Diversion, $19,537 contributed funds, other costs for Phase III contract, and $112,939 for Phase IIA contract. 23. Includes contributed funds, other: $2,278,000 for recreation betterment, $1,589,640 for NED relocation and $70,000 for incremental relocations at Guadalupe River. 24. Includes contributed funds, other costs: $2,227,251 for recreation betterment, $1,496,809 for NED relocations and $0 for incremental relocations at Guadalupe River, and $232,039 for flood control betterments. 25. Contributed funds, other from the State of California for miscellaneous design and construction at Hidden Dam. 26. Includes $2,199,085 code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities at Isabella lake and $224,000 Code 713 funds and costs for improvement at Tillie Creek and Live Oak campgrounds. 27. Includes $407,640 special recreation use fees and costs at Isabella Lake. 28. Includes $131,900 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs (96X5125) at Isabella Lake beginning in FY 1985. 29. Includes $438,000 contributed funds, other, from California Department of Boating and Waterways for design and construction of boat launching and related facilities at Old Isabella Road and Isabella Peninsula and $337,500 for Isabella Dam hydropower studies. 30. Includes $438,000 contributed funds, other, costs for boat launching and related facilities at Old Isabella Road and Isabella Peninsula, and $309,808 costs for Isabella Dam hydropower studies. 31. Includes code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities: Success Lake: Total to date $747,048. Terminus Dam: Total to date: $704,000. 32. Includes $165,000 special recreation use fees and costs at Success Lake. 33. Includes contributed funds, other, from State of California Department of Boating and Waterways and costs for acquisition of a boarding float at Success Lake, $30,000 and at Terminus Dam, $12,420. 34. Includes contributed funds, other, from Kaweah River Power Authority, Visalia, California for Terminus Dam hydropower studies, $423,000; and from DITT, Inc., Paris, France, for Success Lake hydropower studies, $168,000. 35. Includes contributed funds, other, costs for Terminus Dam hydropower studies, $422,697, and for Success Lake hydropower studies, $167,579. 36. Includes $4,300,147 contributed funds, other from the Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake City 35-40 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT for relocation of State Highway 65 at Little Dell Lake. 37. Includes $4,300,147 contributed funds, other, costs for relocation of State Highway 65 at Little Dell Lake. 38. Includes $1,200 initiation of plans for specifications for Code 710 recreation facilities, for FY 1978. Construction of recreation facilities at Martis Creek Lake under Code 720 was determined to be infeasible. 39. Includes contributed funds, other $4,454,938, for lands, easements and rights-of-way for Castle Dam from State of California and contributed funds, other costs for lands, easements and rights-of-way for Castle Dam. 40. Includes $274,000 contributed funds, other, relocation and $227,968 costs. 41. In addition, $66,532 expended for new work from contributed funds, other, miscellaneous construction under local cooperation requirements as related to acquisition of right-of-way and utility alterations for Merced County Stream Group. 42. Includes $1,949,968 San Francisco construction funds and costs and $260,000 Sacramento general investigation funds and costs for Pajaro River. 43. Includes $37,250 contributed funds, other, from Santa Clara Valley Water District for bridge relocation at Pajaro River. 44. Includes $37,250 contributed funds, other, costs for bridge relocation at Pajaro River. 45. Includes code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities at Pine Flat Lake: Total to date: $1,595,100. Includes Public Work Acceleration, Executive (PL 87-68) (Transfer to Corps of Engineers, Civil) 1963 funds and costs ($239,235) for recreation facilities and $19,600 Code 713 funds and costs for Pine Flat fish barrier. 46. Includes $158,300 special recreation fees and costs at Pine Flat Lake and $699,785 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs at Pine Flat Dam. 47. Miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services (non-project) accomplished at expense of State of California under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rightsof- way and utility alterations at Pine Flat Lake. 48. Includes unobligated carryover for continuation of planning and engineering (CP&E) funds as of September 30, 1985 ($29,065) and FY 1986 allocation for Redbank and Fancher Creeks to be included in project cost (for cost sharing) per TWX of September 9, 1985. 49. Includes contributed funds, $759,580 other, from Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District for road relocation and betterment's (Nees Avenue) at Fancher Dam and includes $701,546 contributed funds, other costs for road relocation (Nees Avenue) and betterments at Fancher Dam. 50. Excludes $5,598,000 contributed funds: $400,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects funded under Public Works Acceleration Program; and $1,628,411 for recreation facilities at completed projects funded under Code 711 at Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino. 51. Includes $94,459 special recreation use fees and costs (FY 1982-1983), but excludes prior special recreation fees and cost for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino. 52. Includes $1,625,280 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs at Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino for FY 1985 through FY 1996. 53. Includes $251,911 contributed funds, other from City of Ukiah for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino, hydropower studies; and $338,000 from California department of Boating and Waterways for launching facility at Lake Mendocino. 54. Includes $250,117 contributed funds, other, costs for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino, hydropower studies; and $320,657 for California Department of Boating and Waterways for launching facility at Lake Mendocino. 55. Includes $253,421,793 San Francisco construction funds and costs through August 1983 for Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 56. Includes $964,114 San Francisco maintenance funds and costs through April 1982 for Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 57. Includes $75,400 maintenance and operations of dam funds and costs at Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 58. Includes $208,074 contributed funds, other, from Sonoma county for Dry Creek, Warm Springs, hydropower studies; and $22,500 from City of Ukiah for hatchery pump design at Lake Mendocino. 59. Includes $208,074 contributed funds, other, costs for Dry Creek, Warm Springs hydropower studies; 35-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT and $20,658 costs for hatchery pump design. 60. Excludes $614,608 for Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) project, deauthorized August 5, 1977, and $531,000 for Sacramento River and Major and Minor Tributaries portions which are considered inactive and deferred. 61. Includes Code 710 funds and cost for recreation facilities at Black Butte lake: Total to date $1,000,162. 62. Includes $104,100 special recreation use fees and costs at Black Butte Lake. 63. Miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services (non-project) accomplished at expense of State of California under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rightsof- way and utility alterations (primarily for Sacramento River and Major and Minor Tributaries project) Includes State Highway Commission payment, $789,008, for use of excess excavation from Chico and Mud Creeks and Sandy Gulch (Sacramento River and Major and Minor Tributaries) for freeway embankment through the city of Chico. 64. Includes $41,984 contributed funds, other, from State of California for required modification of existing private facilities and salmon rearing habitat, Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff; $15,977 contributed funds, other, from State of California Department of Boating and Waterways for replacing a boarding float at Orland Buttes boat launching ramp at Black Butte Lake; $392,000 contributed funds, other, from the City of Santa Clara for hydropower studies at Black Butte Lake; and $59,334 contributed funds, other from State of California for relocation. 65. Includes $389,335 contributed funds, other, costs for Black Butte hydropower studies; and $59,334 costs for relocations. 66. Includes $8,849,825 San Francisco construction funds for Walnut Creek. 67. Includes $9,049,609 San Francisco construction costs for Walnut Creek. 68.Includes $450,268 San Francisco required funds for Walnut Creek. 69. Includes $525,846 San Francisco required costs for Walnut Creek. 70. Includes $400,348 San Francisco contributed funds, other, and contributed funds costs for Walnut Creek. 71. Includes $1,937,000 contributed funds, other, from Contra Costa Flood Control and Water Conservation District for replacement of sewerline in Richmond for Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks project. 72. Includes $1,906,943 contributed funds, other, costs for replacement of sewerline in Richmond for Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks project. 73. Excludes funds applicable to other units of this basin authorization (Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, and Tuolomne River Basin, California). (See Table 35-E). 74. Includes $110,000 utilized for preparation of 1957 Economic Feasibility Report and of Revised Feasibility Report (FY 1960, 1961, and 1962) applicable to 1962 reauthorization of project. 75. Includes $80,000 contributed funds, other, and costs, from the Bureau of Reclamation for visitors center at Mark Twain area, New Melones Lake. 35-42 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT TABLE 35-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep 30 1998 12 American River Watershed CA, Caliente Creek CA Coyote and Berryessa Creeks, CA Napa River, CA Kaweah River Yuba River, CA South Sacramento San Lorenzo River, CA Truckee Meadows NV Upper Jordan River, CA West Sacramento CA New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 3,780,000 2,223,000 2,127,000 1,182,930 18,304,930 3,500,283 2,495,692 2,004,798 970,790 17,935,926 - - - - 60,000 - - - - 60,000 - -41,000 - -41,111 4,368,900 12 4,368,900 1,600,000 1,017,000 1,125,000 1,161,000 11,776,000 3 1,432,375 1,010,877 1,263,905 1,138,074 11,709,622 3 - 8,000 527,000 1,182,930 1,717,930 - 5,938 508,419 970,790 1,485,147 11,000 3,338 161,000 63,108 479,000 164,000 454,285 106,030 292,000 134,000 258,987 169,404 252,000 284,343 358 9,265 15 11,000 3,338 161,000 63,108 813,000 27 730,243 662,800 4,168,282 380,752 4,168,282 - 1,576,000 50 1,576,000 - 1,817,000 - 1,817,000 1. Beginning in FY 1982, Advance Engineering and Design (Preconstruction, Engineering and Design) programs are funded under General Investigations Appropriations. 2. Includes FY 1985 unobligated carryover and FY 1986 allocation for CP&E funds and all AE&D funds to be included in project September 9, 1985. cost (for cost sharing) per TWX of 3. Excludes $2,639,955 funds and costs for a previous flood control project on Napa River. (See Table 35-E). 35-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 35-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Mar 3, 1899 July 25,1912 Jan 21, 1927 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 Nov 17, 1987 A depth of 7 feet below Sacramento works. For work above Sacramento. The 10-foot channel up to Sacramento A depth of 6 feet between Sacramento and Colusa and 5 feet between Colusa and Chico Landing at a cost of $390,000 provided flow of rivers is increased to minimum flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second after Shasta Reservoir is built. Authority for a special direct participation of Federal Government of $12 million in cost of Shasta Reservoir. Transfer of authority for expenditure of above $12 million from Secretary of War to Secretary of the Interior. Modified existing navigation project for Sacramento River, CA, to provide for construction of a ship channel 30 feet deep and 200 to 300 feet wide from deep water in Suisun Bay to Washington Lake, including such works as may be necessary to compensate for or alleviate any detrimental salinity conditions resulting from ship channel; a triangular basin of equal depth, 2,400 by 2,000 by 3,400 feet at Washington Lake; and connecting channel 13 feet deep and 120 feet wide, with lock and drawbridge, thence to Sacramento River. Deauthorization of shallow-draft channel, Colusa to Red Bluff, feature of project for navigation, Sacramento River, California. H. Doc. 186, 55th Cong., 2d sess., and 48 55th Cong., 3d sess. (Annual Report 1898, p. 2844 and 1899, p. 3171). H. Doc. 76, 62d Cong., 1st sess. 1 H. Doc. 123, 69th cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 35, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc 35, 73d Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 142, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 1002, 1986 WRDA 35-44 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT TABLE 35-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 10. Oct 23, 1962 Nov 7, 1966 Nov 17, 1986 CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA Levees and channel improvements, lower 11 miles of Corte Madera Creek and tributaries, as modified bu Chief of Engineers. Local cooperation requirements modified to provide 1.5 percent cash contribution toward cost of Ross Valley unit. Modify existing project to direct construction of Unit 4 from Lagunitas Road Bridge to Sir Francis Drake Boulevard, and to include construction of floodproofing measures in vicinity of Lagunitas Road Bridge to insure proper functioning of completed portions of authorized project. Further modify project to eliminate any channel modifications upstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard. H. Doc. 545, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 204, 1966 Flood Control Act. Sec 823, 1986 WRDA RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA May 17, 1950 Feb 10, 1956 Oct 23, 1962 Mar 7, 1974 24. Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino): Channel improvements on lower 98 miles of Russian River and lower reaches of tributaries. Increased appropriation authorization for initial stage of project development. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake: Channel Improvements on Dry Creek below dam. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and channel; compensate for fish losses on the Russian River which may be attributed to the operation of the Coyote Dam component of the project through measures such as possible expansion of the capacity of the fish hatchery at the Warm Springs Dam component of the project. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM H. Doc. 585, 81st Cong., 2d sess. PL 404, 84th cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 547, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 95, 1974 WRDA 35-45 23. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 35-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Dec 22, 1944 Modify Sacramento River Flood Control Project to provide for extensions in levees and other structures along Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries; construct Black Butte Dam and Reservoir; construct low-level Table Mountain Dam and Reservoir with power facilities; and provision of monetary authorization of $15 million for initiation of modification. May 17, 1950 Improvements for protection of Upper Butte Basin (included full monetary authorization). Jul 3, 1958 Extend existing Sacramento River Flood Control Project to Keswick Dam for purposes of zoning area below dam and modification of project by construction of bank protection and incidental channel improvements between Chico Landing and Red Bluff (included full monetary authorization). Jul 3, 1958 Additional authorization of $17 million for comprehensive plan approved in act of December 22, 1944. Jul 14, 1960 Further modification of Sacramento River Flood Control Project by construction of initial 10- year phase of bank erosion control works and setback levees on Sacramento River and authorization of $14,240,000 for prosecution of modification. May 12, 1967 Additional authorization of $7 million for bank protection approved in act of July 14, 1960. Mar 7, 1974 Initiation of construction of second phase of bank erosion control works and setback levees on Sacramento River as approved in act of July 14, 1960, and additional authorization of $16 million for such purpose. 3 Jun 19, 1975 Deauthorization of Table Mountain Dam and Reservoir. 4 H. Doc. 649, 78th Cong., 2d sess. 2 H. Doc. 3667, 81st cong., 1st sess. 2 H. Doc. 272, 84th Cong., 2d sess. 2 S. Doc. 103, 80th Cong., PL 90-17 PL 93-251 H. Doc. 94-192, 94th Cong., 1st sess. 1. Contains latest published map of section above Sacramento. For map of section below Sacramento, see H. Doc. 1123, 60t h Cong., 2d sess. And S. Doc. 142, 79th cong., 2d sess. 2. Contains latest published map. 3. Total monetary authorization available, exclusive of preauthorization studies from general investigations appropriations, amounts to $72,740,000. 4. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, PL 93-251, as amended by sec. 157, PL 94-587, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of project unit. 35-46 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT TABLE 35-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1998 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Feather River, CA 1951 - $5,752 12 Middle River and Connecting Channels, CA Completed 1974 $8,354 3 93,494 4 Mokelumne River, CA Completed 1974 8,500 189,152 Navajo Reservoir, NM Completed - 2,132 5 6 Old River, CA Completed 1970 23,185 7 9631,128 Stockton and Mormon 253,151 8 Channels, CA Completed 1970 200,928 9 10 11 218,854 Suisun Bay Channel, CA Completed 1974 217,677 3,316,622 12 13 Suisun Channel, CA Completed 1973 191,728 s is 733,489 Suisun Point Channel, CA Completed 1965 1. Maintenance project, channels adequate for commerce. 2. Includes $10 for maintenance for previous project. Excludes $6,160 for previous project and $3,840 for existing project for maintenance expended from contributed funds. 3. Includes $1,600 for previous project. 4. Includes $790 for previous project. 5. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended. 6. All costs transferred from Los Angeles District in FY 1968. 7. Estimated cost to local interests was $3,6000 for lands, damages and public landings. Remaining portion of project, consisting of side channel at Orwood and completion of project channels from mouth of Old River to Lammers Ferry rod and from Crocker Cut to Holly Sugar Factory was deauthorized November 17, 1986, by WRDA of 1986. 8. Upon completion of Mormon Slough, Calaveral River, CA in February 1970, local interests accepted maintenance responsibility for Mormon Slough as well as for Stockton and Mormon Channels CA, and Federal maintenance was discontinued. No Federal maintenance costs have been incurred since FY 1969. 9. Includes $58, 901 for previous project. 10. Excludes $59,551 expended from required contributed funds for previous project. 11. Excludes work accomplished under existing project at a cost of $207,198 from Public Works Administration funds allotted to San Joaquin River, CA. 12. Includes $59,817 for previous projects. Excludes $5,449 expended from required contributed funds for previous project. 13. Maintenance responsibility transferred to San Francisco District, January 1, 1974. 14. Includes reconnaissance and condition surveys of $5,496 and $483 for fiscal year 1963 and 1964, respectively. 15. Estimated cost (July 1964) to local interests was $12,000 for lands, damages, and spoil retention dikes. 35-47 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 35-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1998 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Alameda Creek, CA American River, CA Aquatic Plant Control, CA Big Dry Creek Dam and diversion, CA Big Wash, Milford, Beaver County, UT Burch Creek, Weber County, Cache Creek Basin, CA (Outlet Channel) Chester, CA Cottonwood Creek, CA Coyote Creek, CA Duck Creek, San Joaquin County, CA East Weaver Creek, CA Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed UT Active/no FY 95 Expenditures Active/no FY 95 Expenditures Active/no FY 95 Expenditures Completed Completed Completed Folsom Lake, American River, CA Completed Green Valley Creek, Solano County, CA Completed Kays Creek, UT Completed Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, CA Completed Klamath River, CA Completed Lake Camanche, CA Completed Lake Oroville, CA Completed Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, CA Completed Marysville Lake, CA Active/no FY 9 Merced River, CA Middle Creek, CA Mormon Slough, CA Napa River Basin, CA Expenditures Completed Completed Completed Active/no FY 95 Expenditures New Bullards Bar, CA Completed North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, CA Completed Pinole Creek, CA Completed Redwood Creek, Humboldt County, CA Completed Reese River, Battle Mountain, NV Completed 1978 1959 1967 1955 1961 1964 1993 1981 1991 1968 1967 1965 1957 1963 1973 1977 1972 1976 1981 1976 1980 1976 1967 1976 1979 1972 1972 1968 1970 1969 $26,995,350 2,125,818 3 1,000 1,369,931 4 217,879 56 26,049 5 - 7 3,570,000 8 15,765,000 705,622 15 664,825 59 220,636 1510o 63,014,810 i1 136,026 512 407,989 513 1,503,073 4,838,000 10,252,950 70,425,470 5 14 5 15 16 27,835,263 17 - 18 10,918,796 2,643,499 2,965,402 2,639,955 19 20 21 1 22 12,890,625 23 904,278 52425 885,750 is 4,620,070 126 133,339 527 35-48 $54,778 1 2 5 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT TABLE 35-E (Cont'd) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1998 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Rheem Creek, CA Completed 1962 400,000 1528- Rodeo Creek, CA Completed 1966 974,100 15 Salinas River, CA Inactive 1952 94,213 129 Salt Lake City, Jordan River, UT Completed 1961 1,227,570 30 San Leandro Creek, CA Completed 1973 1,000,000 131 San Lorenzo Creek, CA Completed 1962 5,130,821 132 San Lorenzo River, CA Completed 1966 4,314,406 133 Sevier River near Redmond, UT Completed 1952 919,000 134 Sonoma Creek, CA Inactive 1973 781,500 1 3s Truckee River and Tributaries, Active/no FY 95 1968 1,038,960 CA and NV Expenditures 1. Project responsibility transferred from San Francisco District to Sacramento District April 1, 1982. 2. Scheduling of reservoir operations costs. 3. Excludes $54,919 other contributed funds for miscellaneous construction for local interests pursuant to requirements of local cooperation were $951,000 (1959) for lands and relocations. 4. Excludes $44,008 other contributed funds for construction in connection with bridge construction pursuant to requirements of local cooperation. Total cost to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation was $370,000 (9159) for lands and relocations. 5. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of sec. 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended. 6. Excludes $22,000 for preauthorization studies. 7. Project not economically feasible; preconstruction planning was terminated in FY 1993. 8. Excludes $69,262 other contributed funds from State of California for two low water crossings and appurtenances at Chester. A fish ladder modification project was continued under sec. 1135 in FY 1995 at fiscal year cost of $172,565. 9. Excludes $50,000 for preauthorization studies. Estimated costs to local interests were $665,000 for lands and damages including relocations. 10. Includes $174,938 Public Works Acceleration Program Funds. 11. Transferred to Bureau of Reclamation in May 1956 for operation and maintenance by that agency in conjunction with other units of Central Valley project. 12. Excludes $20,000 for preauthorization studies. 13. Includes $30,000 for preauthorization studies. Estimated costs (FY 1973) to local interest for all requirements of local cooperation were $150,117 for lands and damages including relocation. 14. Includes $73,000 for preauthorization studies. Non-Federal (Kern County Water Agency) cost for road relocation was $18,260 (required contributed funds). 15. Constructed by East Bay Municipal Utility District. Final Federal contribution of $51,202 made July 18, 1978 (total $10,111,684). Non-Federal costs $34,988,536. 16. Constructed by State of California. Final Federal contribution of $64,186 was made on February 9, 1981 (total $69,994,105) for flood control reservation. 17. Cherry Valley and New don Pedro Reservoirs constructed by local interests. Federal contribution of $9,000,000 and $5,464,000, respectively, for flood control reservation. Final Federal contribution of $308,898 was made on January 18, 1972, for New don Pedro. Excludes $3,004,946, contributed funds, other, for miscellaneous engineering and construction (nonproject) at local interest expense under local cooperation requirements for acquisition of rights-ofway for levee and channel improvement on Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries. Unconstructed portion of snagging and clearing project modification of Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries) was classified as "deferred" on April 9, 1993. For full report see Annual Report for FY 1993. 35-49 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 18. Planning and any future development is uncertain awaiting State of California's position on support of Marysville project. 19. Constructed by Merced Irrigation District, Final Federal contribution of $839 was made December 2, 1975 (total $10,818,638) for flood control reservation. 20. Estimated costs (FY 1967) to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation were $1,340,000 for lands and damages including relocation. 21. Non-Federal cost $2,965m402 (FY1976) for lands and relocations. Federal contribution of $599,336 made to State Reclamation Board. 22. This project was. reclassified as "active" on August 3, 1987. 23. Constructed by Yuba County Water Agency. Final Federal contribution of $33,470 was made in FY 1972 (total $12,759,127) for flood control reservation. 24. Includes $41,800 for preauthorization studies. 25. Excludes $146,000 other contributed funds for miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-of-way, relocation and utility alterations. 26. Includes $107,000 costs for remedial work to drainage system completed in FY 1977. 27. Includes $52,549 contributed funds. 29. Cost includes engineering and design prior to June 30, 1952 and costs of $4,288 (FY 1962-1963) to determine if project classification to an active category was justified. 30. Estimated cost to local interest for all requirements of local cooperation were $463,000 (July 1962) for lands and damages including relocations. Project prevented $4,544,000 in damages from the April-May 1994 snowmelt runoff. 31. Excludes $285,329 contributed funds. 32. Excludes $200,000 estimated value of work performed in lieu of cash contribution. 33. Excludes $421,182 contributed funds. 34. Excludes $48,000 required contributed funds toward first cost. Costs to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation, including required contributions, were $118,000 (1951). Project prevented $9,000 in damages from the April-May 1994 snowmelt runoff. 35. Place inactive 1974. 35-50 TABLE 35-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT TABLE 35-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Alhambra Creek, CA 1981 1986 $300,000 Bear River, CA 1980 1986 Cottonwood Creek 1991 1998 15,765,000 Eel River, CA 1971 1986 1,272,816 Gleason Creek, NV 1977 1986 215,826 Humbolt River and and Tributaries, NV 1982 1986 1,532,932 Lakeport Lake, CA 1 1976 1993 2,353,000 Little Valley Wash, Magna, UT 1951 1977 Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, CA 1993 1998 27,835,263 Mad River Basin, CA 1973 1986 4,243,750 Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff, CA 1997 1998 Sacramento River Major and Minor Tributaries 1997 1998 Spanish Fork River, UT 1955 1977 20,000 Weber River and Tributaries, UT 1974 1972 75,120 (Morgan County) Wildcat and San Pablo Creek Reach 2, CA 1997 1998 1. Lakeport Lake was deauthorized on November 17, 1988; and deauthorized November 18, 1993. 35-51 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 35-H SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA: TIDAL AND FLOOD CONDITIONS PREVAILING (See Section 1 of Text) Range in Feet Miles from Mean Extreme Ordinary Extreme Mouth of Tidal 1 Tidal 2 Flood 3 Flood 4 Place River Collinsville 0 4.3 7 8 10 Sacramento 59 2.0 2 3 20 28 Verona (Mouth of Feather River) 80 - Trace 22 30 Colusa 144 - - 26 32 Chico Landing 193 - - 20 25 Red Bluff 248 - - 24 30 1. Mean lower low water to mean higher high water. 2. Tide at low water season only. 3. Mean lower low water to flood stage. 4. Extreme low water to indicated flood condition. TABLE 35-I SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA: TOTAL COST OF NEW WORK FOR PROJECT 2 (See Section 4 of Text) Federal Non-Federal 2 Corps of Coast Required Lands and Engineers Guard Cash Damages (includ- Total Total Modification (Construction) (Construction) Contribution ing Relocations) Project Prior to 1950 Modification $4,009,938 $80,000 $1,307,500 $1,042,000 $2,349,500 $6,439,438 1950 Modification 1,823,179 - 35,000 135,00 170,000 1,993,170 Total 5,833,117 80,000 1,342,500 1,177,000 2,519,500 8,432,617 1. Completed in May 1960. 2. Excludes $5,865,000 (Feb 1954) local interests costs for Stockton Deep Water Channel terminal facilities required under terms of project authorization. 35-52 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT TABLE 35-J SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA: PROJECT UNITS (1950 MODIFICATION) RECLASSIFIED AND EXCLUDED FROM PROJECT COST1 (See Section 4 of Text) Non-Federal Federal Required Lands and Corps of Cash Damages (includ- Total Unit Engineers Contributions ing Relocations) Total Project Settling Basin above head of Burns Cutoff 1 $1,073,000 $30,000 $200,000 $230,000 $1,303,000 Burns Cutoff improvement; new turning basin; dredging Mormon Channel 25 7,882,000 3 431,000 1,455,000 1,886,000 9,768,000 Upper Stockton Channel enlargement 45 535,000 34,000 15,000 49,000 584,000 1. July 1959 price index. Deauthorized August 5, of San Francisco Bay to Stockton Channel, Sacramento 1977. District, Improvement No. 3. 2. Deferred; July 1960 price index. 5. Deauthorized November 17, 1986. 3. For lands and construction. 4. Deleted by 1965 River and Harbor Act authorization TABLE 35-K MERCED COUNTY STREAM GROUP, CA MAXIMUM INFLOW, STORAGE, AND OUTFLOW FOR PROJECTS (See Section 19 of Text) Maximum Inflow Maximum Maximum (c.f.s.) Storage Outflow Stream (hourly) (acre-feet) (c.f.s.) Burns Bear Owens Mariposa 11,079 7,192 10,044 8,286 6,159 3,878 1,594 7,758 2,050 1,679 154 959 35-53 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 35-L RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA: ESTIMATED COST FOR NEW WORK (See Section 23 of Text) Estimated Cost Non-Federal Project Feature Federal Contribution Total Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino): Channel Improvements below Dam on lower 98 miles of Russian River $14,436,000 $5,598,000 $20,034,000 Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Improvements below Dam 259,240,000 103,777,000 2 363,017,000 Total $273,676,000 $109,375,000 $383,051,000 1. Exclusive of $1,628,000 for recreation facilities at to be paid over a period not to exceed 50 years after use completed projects. of storage is initiated and inclusive of lands and 2. Reimbursement by local interests to Federal damages. Government for costs allocated to water supply storage TABLE 35-M RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA: ESTIMATED FEATURES AND ESTIMATED COSTS (See Section 23 of Text) Height of Reservoir Nearest City Distance Dam and Capacity Estimated Name (California) Above Mouth Type (Acre-Ff) Cost Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Ukiah Mile 0.8-East Fork 160 Feet- 122,500 $17,550,000 1 Mendocino) of Russian River Earthfill Channel Improvements (East Ukiah Mile 0 to 0.8 East - - 2,484,000 Fork) Fork below Coyote Valley Dam Guerneville Mile 0 to 98,Russia - - and lower 98 miles of River Russian River) Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Healdsburg Mile 14.4 Dry Creek 319 Feet- 381,000 $363,017,000 Earthfill Channel Improvements (Dry Healdsburg Mile 1 to 14.4 Dry - - 2,864,000 Creek) below Dry Creek Creek (Warm Springs Dam) 1. Exclusive of $1,628,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects. 35-54 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT TABLE 35-N SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM: PROJECT UNITS RECLASSIFIED AND EXCLUDED FROM COST ESTIMATE (See Section 24 of Text) Current Estimated Cost Unit Classification Federal Non-Federal 1 Total 1944 Modification: Antelope Creek 2 Inactive $1,400,000 $340,000 $1,740,000 Lower Butte Basin 3 Deferred 7,286,000 2,285,000 9,571,000 Thomas Creek 2 Deferred 1,140,000 140,000 1,280,000 Willow Creek 2 Inactive 1,290,000 120,000 1,410,000 Bypass Levees 4 Deferred 7,100,000 940,000 8,040,000 Bypass Levees 4 Inactive 3,010,000 - 3,010,000 1950 Modification: Upper Butte Basin 2 Deferred 3,530,000 1,787,000 5,317,000 1. For lands and damages, including relocation. weir (July 1954 price level). 2. July 1960 price level. 4. July 1961 price level. 3. Excludes work applicable to extension of Moulton TABLE 35-0 SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM: CONSTRUCTION ACCOMPLISHED AND CONTRACT COSTS (See Section 24 of Text) Required Contract Federal Contributed Total Contract 42A continuation (Bank protection, miles 88.8-143.3, Sacramento River, Sacramento, Colusa, Sutter and Yolo Counties) Lower American River - River Park initiation (Bank Protection, Sacramento County). $803,695 500,000 $152,641 $956,336 0 500,000 35-55 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 35-P FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 80-858 AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Section 32 of Text) Fiscal Year Cost Study Stage (Federal) Colorado River at Grand Junction, CO ' Construction $ 38,802 Magpie and Don Julio Creeks, CA Plans and Specifications 397,090 Battle Mountain, NV Plans and Specification 231,260 Fallon, NV Reconnaissance/Feasibility 40,410 Hamilton City, CA Reconnaissance 1,236 Reno Flood Warning System Reconnaissance/Feasibility 204,829 Rock Creek and Keefer Slough Reconnaissance 5,834 Tehama, CA Reconnaissance 47,045 Winters, CA Plans and Specification $134,426 $1,100,932 2 1. See Improvement No. 8 for construction. 2. Excludes Coordination Account. TABLE 35-Q AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION (SECTION 206, PUBLIC LAW 104-303) (See Section 32 of Text) Fiscal Year Cost Study Stage (Federal) Upper Jordan River Ecosystem Restoration Penn Mine Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration 1 Excludes Coordination Acts Reconnaissance/Feasibility Reconnaissance/Feasibility 35-56 $ 90,534 $439,8991 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT TABLE 35-R SNAGGING AND CLEARING UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION PURSUANT TO (SECTION 208, 1954 FLOOD CONTROL ACT PUBLIC LAW 83-780) Fiscal Year Cost Study Stage (Federal) Blackwood Creek Reconnaissance/Feasibility $ 7,039 San Joaquin River Firebaugh 13,918 Walker River, NV Feasibility 81,218 Ward Creek 6,931 $109,106 TABLE 35-S SURVEYS (See Section 34 of Text) Fiscal year costs were as follows: Flood Damage Prevention Studies Required Cost Contributions Non-Federal Contributions (not required) Special Studies Special Investigations Review of FERC Licenses Interagency Water Resources Development National Estuary Program American Waterfowl Management Plan Coordination with Other Water Resource Agencies Planning Assistance to States (Colorado - $0 Alluviual Fan Study -$23,085) (California - $1,528) National Marine Fisheries Service $1,865,720 1,671,567 0 4,592,736 22,384 22,426 86,588 1,461 1,989 793,125 24,613 $528 35-57 PROJECTS SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED UNDER THE FORMER CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION The California Debris Commission, consisting of three Corps officers appointed by the President with the consent of the Senate, created by act of March 1, 1893 (27 Stat. L., p. 507), was organized in San Francisco, CA, on June 8, 1893, and has jurisdiction and duties extending over drainage area of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, comprising great central valley of California and extending from crest of the Sierra Nevada on the east to that of the Coast Range on the west, and from Mount Shasta and Pit River Basin on the north to Tehachapi Mountains on the south. These rivers empty into head of Suisun Bay ultimately discharging into the Pacific Ocean through connecting bays and straits and the Golden Gate. Duties of the Commission comprise regulation of hydraulic mining in drainage area of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, CA, so that debris will not be carried into navigable waters or otherwise cause damage; jurisdiction over construction and control of water storage facilities for domestic, irrigation, and power development purposes; and direction of improvements for control of floods on Sacramento River. On November 19, 1986, the Commission was abolished by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) and all authorities, powers, functions, and duties were transferred to the Secretary of the Army. All acquired lands and other interests presently under jurisdiction of the Commission were authorized to be retained and administered under direction of the Secretary. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Regulation of hydraulic mining and preparation of plans ................ 35-1A 2. Sacramento River and tributaries, CA (debris control) ................... 35-2A 3. Treatment of Yuba River debris situation-restraining barriers, CA ...... 35-3A Flood Control 4. Sacramento River, CA ............... 35-4A Tables Table 35-AA Table 35-BB Table 35-CC Page Cost and Financial Statement ............... 35-7A Authorizing Legislation .............. 35-10A Sacramento River, CA: Total Cost of Existing Project ... .35-12A Navigation 1. REGULATION OF HYDRAULIC MINING AND PREPARATION OF PLANS Location. Operations largely limited to territory between Mount Lassen on the north and Yosemite Valley on the south, on western watershed of Sierra Nevada. (See Geological Survey sheets for the area, 25 in number.) Existing project. Provided for regulating hydraulic mining operations, planning improvement of conditions upon Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers and their tributaries affected by such operations, and preparation of plans to enable hydraulic mining to be resumed in their drainage areas. In addition, the Secretary of the Army is authorized to enter into contracts to supply storage for water and use of outlet facilities from debris-storage reservoirs for domestic and irrigation purposes and power development upon such conditions of delivery, use, and payment as he may approve. Applications of prospective miners were fully investigated by the former California Debris Commission and permits to operate were issued to those who provide satisfactory debris-restraining basins by construction of suitable dams where necessary or agree to make payment for storage in 35-1A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Government-constructed debris-restraining reservoirs constructed under act of June 19, 1934, as set forth below. For location and description of Government- constructed, debris-restraining reservoirs for general hydraulic mining, see Improvement 2. Local cooperation. Mineowners bore all expenses incurred in complying with orders of the former Commission for regulation of mining and restraint of debris. Operations and results during fiscal year. Minor administrative duties were accomplished. Administrative work overlaps that of improvements 2, 3, and 4, hereunder, and that of Sacramento District. Historical summary. The former Commission received 1,292 applications for hydraulic mining licenses; 1 mine is licensed, but does not use storage behind Government debris dams. Work remaining is, in general, continuation of above or similar operations. 2. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA (DEBRIS CONTROL) Location. Project reservoirs are to be constructed in watersheds of Yuba, Bear, and American Rivers, CA (See Geological Survey sheets for basin areas, seven in number.) Existing project. For description of completed North Fork and Harry L. Englebright projects and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Initial recreation facilities were provided in FY 1959. Recreation areas at Harry L.Englebright Dam are maintained by the Corps. Recreation areas at North Fork Dam are no longer maintained and operated by Auburn Recreation Park and Parkway District, but have been turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation (known as the Water and Power Resources Service between November 6, 1979, and May 18, 1981) on a permit basis. Total Federal cost of new work for construction of these reservoirs was $4,646,872, including $40,000 and $25,000, respectively, for basic recreation facilities at Englebright Dam and North Fork Dam. Reservoir project sites on Middle Fork of American River and on Bear River have been deauthorized and excluded from foregoing cost. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by Sec. 12, Public Law 93-251, as amended, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of that portion of the project. Estimated cost of that portion is $1,820,000 (1935). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Improvements made to facilities at North Fork Dam by Auburn Recreation Park and Parkway District under a lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army and Auburn Boat Clubs (concessionaire) at an estimated cost of $46,000 since September 1953. On March 1, 1979, lands and waters at North Fork Dam were turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation on a 5-year renewable basis. Permit No. DACWO05-4-79-527 was renewed for 5 years on March 1, 1984, March 1, 1989, and on March 1, 1994. Bureau will operate and maintain such use until Auburn project is completed, then a fee transfer will be made. Actual operation and maintenance of the recreation resource is being done by State of California by contract with the Bureau. Licenses. Under provisions of Contract No. W-1105-eng-2998 with Pacific Gas and Electric Co., (PG&E) (a 1941 contract which expired July 31, 1991) payment was made to Federal Government of $18,000 per year for first 30 years and $48,000 per year for the next 20 years in return for use of head at Englebright Dam and generation of hydroelectric power. Total payment through September 30, 1998, amounts to $1,719,109; these funds are now paid to the Secretary of the Army and deposited for return to the Treasury. Payment for FY 1998 has not been received. PG&E has obtained a new license, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission License No. 1403-004, issued February 11, 1993, for continued operation of Narrows No. 1 Hydroelectric Project and has entered into a new storage agreement and an operation agreement with the Federal Government (Corps). Total payment of $66,070 was received in FY 1994, but only $48,000 was reallocated to the District. In FY 1995, $18,070 was reallocated to the District. Payments under new agreement are effective as of Fiscal Year 1993 and will be 8.2 percent of previous fiscal year's total costs for operation and maintenance. License No. 2246, effective April 9, 1970 (date New Narrows powerplant was put in operation) was issued by Federal Power Commission (known as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission since January 9, 1978) to Yuba County Water Agency for hydroelectric power development of Yuba River by the company upstream from Englebright Dam. Under provisions of Contract No. DA-04-167-CIV-ENG-66-95 with Yuba County Water Agency, payment is to be made to the Federal 35-2A SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT Government of $100,000 per year for no more than 50 years. First payment (partial) of $73,151 was made April 1, 1971; total payment through September 30, 1997, amounts to $2,509,066. These funds are paid to Sacramento District and deposited for return to the Treasury. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued at Harry L. Englebright Dam at a cost of $3,538,005, including recreation facilities. Dam safety assurance studies at Englebright Dam have been completed. Historical summary. Construction of dams was initiated in 1937; North Fork project was completed and in use at end of FY 1939, and Harry L. Englebright project was completed in January 1941. The two debris-control structures are in good condition. Public use of these reservoir recreation areas greatly overtaxes present capacities. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated at Englebright Dam in FY 1981 and were completed in FY 1987. 3. TREATMENT OF YUBA RIVER DEBRIS SITUATION-RESTRAINING BARRIERS, CA Location. Works are on Yuba River between Marysville and where the river emerges from the foothills, near Hammonton, some 10 miles easterly from Marysville, or about 9 miles below the Narrows. (See Geological Survey Topographic map of Sacramento Valley, CA) Existing project. For description of completed project and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Total cost of new work was $723,259, of which $361,482 was U.S. funds and $361,777 required contributed funds by State of California. (For details of project in its original form, see Annual Report, 1917, p. 1810.) In February 1963, center section of dam failed and major rehabilitation of structure was completed in December 1964. Total cost for required rehabilitation was $1,660,000, of which $830,000 was Federal cost and $830,000 required contribution by State of California toward rehabilitation cost. During the December 24, 1964, floodflows on the Yuba River, the rehabilitated Daguerre Point Dam sustained considerable damage. (See 1965 Annual Report, p. 1647 "Operations and results during fiscal year.") The reconstructed portion of the dam completed earlier in December 1964 was undamaged by the flood. Permanent repair of Daguerre Point Dam abutment and fish facilities was completed in October 1965 at a cost of $447,808 with Federal and required State contributed funds on a matching basis. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for new work and major rehabilitation work. Total first cost to local interests for new work was $361,777 (required contribution by State of California). In addition, training walls were built on each bank below Daguerre Point for 11,250 feet and just above Daguerre Point, on the south bank, for 11,000 linear feet by two gold-dredging companies in connection with their dredging operations. To build these training walls would have cost the United States $450,000 (1902 estimate). Flood channels were also built by gold-dredging companies within confines of project works. Cost to the United States of equally effective works to restrain debris movement would have been more than $776,000 (1926 estimate). Total costs to local interests for initial and permanent major rehabilitation works were $830,000 and $223,904, respectively, (required contribution by State of California). State of California must contribute annually an amount equal to the Federal allotment for maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations consisted of condition and operation studies by hired labor on Yuba River. Historical summary. Construction of project works was initiated in November 1902. Construction of Daguerre Point Dam was completed in May 1906; diversion of river over dam was completed in 1910; training walls and dikes were completed in 1935. About 149 million cubic yards of debris are held in lower 7 miles of Yuba River between Marysville and downstream end of training walls. About 20 million cubic feet, are confined in river channel by Daguerre Point Dam. Additional millions of yards of loose material are in mine tailing fields adjacent to project training walls in upper 7-mile reach of project. Initial rehabilitation of Daguerre Point Dam begun in July 1963 was completed in December 1964. Contract for permanent rehabilitation of structure was initiated in July and completed in October 1965. Flood Control 35-3A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 4. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Location. Works covered by this improvement are on Sacramento River and tributaries in north-central California from Collinsville to Ordbend, a distance of 184 miles. Previous project. For details see page 1815 of Annual Report for 1917, page 1995 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 2262 of Annual Report for 1907. Existing project. Sacramento River flood control project is a comprehensive plan of flood control for Sacramento River and lower reaches of its principal tributaries. Improvement extends along Sacramento River from Ordbend in Glenn County, CA, 184 miles downstream to its mouth at Collinsville at upper end of Suisun Bay, and comprises a system of levees, overflow weirs, drainage pumping plants, and flood bypass channels or floodways designed to carry surplus floodwaters without inundation of valley lands. About 980 miles of levee construction, with an average height of 15 feet and 98 miles of bank protection are involved in project. For further details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 2115. (See table 35-BB for authorizing legislation.) Estimated (October 1987) cost for original project (exclusive of supplemental levee improvements), including new work and maintenance, is $163,925,000 of which $68,925,000 is Federal cost and $95 million non-Federal ($90,050,562 for lands and damages and relocations and $4,949,438 required contributed funds for levee construction, bank protection works, and levee setbacks). Of this amount, $4,939,752 was for new work and $9,686 for maintenance. Estimated October 1996 total project cost is $171,950,000, of which $76,322,000 is Federal and $95,628,000 is non-Federal. Total estimate now includes remedial levee work for Yolo Bypass and Cache Slough (Unit 109) and land acquisition for Little Holland Tract as hydraulic and environmental mitigation in potential projects impacting stages of the Sacramento River, but excludes Sacramento Urban Area; Marysville/Yuba City Area; Mid-Valley Area; Lower Sacramento Area; and Upper Sacramento Area Levee Reconstruction Projects. Colusa Basin Drain and Knights Landing (West Levee) are not incrementally economically feasible, but these sites have been transferred to Upper Sacramento Area. Knights Landing (East Levee) has been included with Mid-Valley Area. In addition to project requirements, local interests constructed several pumping plants for drainage of agricultural and urban land protected by project levees. Some channel clearing work was accomplished by State of California and other local interests to supplement project levee construction. Dredging below Cache Slough and reconstruction of Cache Creek settling basin weir are considered deferred and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (July 1962) of these project units is $2,560,000 and $520,000, respectively, a total of $3,080,000 plus U.S. costs, for construction. Operation and maintenance of completed project will be responsibility of local interests; as units of project are completed, they are transferred to agencies of State of California for operation and maintenance. Existing project was adopted by 1917 Flood Control Act (H. Doc 81, 62d Cong., 1st sess., as modified by Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 63d Cong., 1st sess.), 1928 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 23, 69th Cong., 1st sess.), River and Harbor Act of 1937 (S. Committee print 75th Cong., 1st sess.), and 1941 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 205, 77th Cong., 1st sess.). Phase I - Sacramento River Flood Control System Evaluation recommended reconstruction of 32 miles of Sacramento area levees. Report was approved and in March 1989, Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction project was established under authority of Sacramento River Flood Control Project. New project is located within boundaries of Sacramento River Flood Control System in highly urbanized area around city of Sacramento, near confluence of Sacramento and American Rivers. It includes Natomas area levees from Natomas Cross Canal Bypass through Reclamation District 900 and portions of the Yolo Bypass east levee in West Sacramento; and, in South Sacramento, the east bank of Sacramento River from Miller Park to town of Freeport. Estimated (October 1995) cost for Sacramento Urban project is $42,900,000 of which $28,215,000 is Federal and $14,685,000 is non-Federal (including a cash contribution of $2,135,000). Sacramento River Flood Control Project (Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District) (G.C.I.D.) is part of the fishery/irrigation enhancement project being developed by G.C.I.D. Project is located at River Mile 206 on Sacramento River near the Glenn-Tehama county line. The Corps riffle restoration project includes multiple sheet piles coupled with stone to 35-4A SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT replicate natural riffle and bank protection to restore river hydraulic gradient to pre-1970 conditions. This will stabilize river hydraulics. Estimated (October 1995) project cost is $14,200,000, of which $10,650,000 is Federal and $3,550,000 is non-Federal. Project was established under authority of the 1917 Sacramento River Flood Control Project (see Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1990 and Water Resources Development Act of 1996). Phase II - Marysville/Yuba City Area Levee Reconstruction. Project is located within boundaries of the Sacramento River Flood Control System in Butte, Sutter and Yuba counties in north-central California. Area includes Feather and Yuba Rivers and their tributaries, Sutter Bypass, cities of Marysville and Yuba City and communities of Linda and Olivehurst. An evaluation of about 134 miles of Sacramento River Flood Control Project levees in Marysville/Yuba City area identified about 22 miles of levees as being structurally unstable. Project consists of reconstructing those levees by installing about 17 miles of toe drains, installing about 4 miles of slurry cut-off walls and backfilling about 1 mile of a drainage ditch to rectify structural stability; also consists of raising about 10 miles of levees to restore design freeboard and developing about 76 acres for fish and wildlife mitigation. Estimated (October 1998) project cost is $42,970,000, of which $32,260,000 is Federal and $10,710,000 is non-Federal (including a cash contribution of $5,190,000). Project was established under authority of Sacramento River Flood Control Project. Phase III -Mid-Valley Area Levee Reconstruction. Project is located within the boundaries of the Sacramento River Flood Control System in Placer, Solano, Sutter, Yolo and Yuba Counties in north-central California. Area includes the Sacramento and Feather Rivers, Knights Landing Ridge Cut, Sutter and Yolo Bypasses and portions of the Bear River including Yankee Slough, Dry, Cache, Putah Creeks and the Natomas Cross Canal. Communities in the area include Knights Landing, Robbins, Davis and Woodland. An evaluation of about 240 miles of the Sacramento River Flood Control Project levees in the Mid-Valley area identified about 18 miles of levees that are structurally deficient. Project consists of reconstructing about 18 miles of levees by installing about 6.9 miles of landside berms with toe drains, relocation of ditches, about 11.2 miles of embankment modifications, about .2 miles of slurry cut-off walls, the restoration of levee height, and developing land for about 52 acres of fish and wildlife mitigation. Estimated (October 1998) project cost is $19,900,000, of which $14,900,000 is Federal and $5,000,000 is non-Federal (including a cash contribution of $2,454,000). Project was established under authority of the Sacramento River Flood Control Project. Phase IV - Lower Sacramento Area Levee Reconstruction. Project is located within the boundaries of the Sacramento River Flood Control System in Sacramento County in north-central California. Area includes the lower Sacramento River and its distributary sloughs and the city of Clarksburg. An evaluation of about 295 miles of the Sacramento River Flood Control Project levees in the Lower Sacramento area identified about 47 miles of levees that are structurally deficient. Project consists of reconstructing about 2.6 miles of levees by installing landside berms with toe drains, backfilling of existing drainage collector systems, slurry cut-off walls, the restoration of levee height, and developing land for about 2 acres of fish and wildlife mitigation. Estimated (October 1998) project cost is $6,200,000, of which $4,660,000 is Federal and $1,540,000 is non-Federal (including a cash contribution of $1,090,000). Project was established under authority of Sacramento River Flood Control Project. Phase V - Upper Sacramento Area Levee Reconstruction. Project is located within the boundaries of the Sacramento River Flood System in Colusa County in north-central California. Area includes the upper Sacramento River and its tributaries and the city of Colusa. An evaluation of about 315 miles of the Sacramento River Flood Control Project levees in the Upper Sacramento area identified about 12 miles of levees that are structurally deficient. Project consists of reconstruction of about 3.7 miles of levees by installing landside berms with toe drains, slurry cut-off walls, the restoration of levee height, and developing land for about 1.3 acres of fish and wildlife mitigation. Estimated October 1998 project cost is $7,500,000, of which $5,640,000 is Federal and $1,860,000 is non-Federal (including a cash contribution of $856,000). Project was established under authority of Sacramento River Flood Control Project. 35-5A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with requirements for all work completed and indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: (a) Sacramento Urban Area Levee Recontruction: Construction is complete, however, final payment and contract close-out activities remain. (b) Sacramento River Flood Control Project (Glenn Colusa Irrigation District (G.C.I.D.)): Engineering was continued on riffle restoration on Sacramento River including building of multiple sheet piles coupled with stone to replicate natural riffle and bank protection to restore river hydraulic gradient to approximate pre-1970 conditions. (c) Marysville/Yuba City Area Levee Reconstruction: Completed contract 2a awarded July 1995 and continued the mitigation contract awarded August 1995. (d) Mid-Valley Area Levee Reconstruction: Completed Contract 1A awarded in September 1996 and continued contract lB awarded in July 1997. Engineering continued for the second Project Cooperation Agreement for Areas 2, 3 and 4. (e) Lower Sacramento Area Levee Reconstruction: Engineering continued. (f) Upper Sacramento Area Levee Reconstruction: Engineering continued. In accordance with Section 215 agreement signed September 22, 1997, local sponsor constructed 1,000 lineal feet of seepage/stability berm along the Sacramento River (Site E). Completed contract 3a awarded September 1997, continued contract 2b awarded August 1997, continued contract 3 awarded July 1988, and continued maintenance period for mitigation contract awarded August 1995. Historical summary. Construction of existing project began in FY 1918 and is about 99 percent complete. Channel improvement to date has produced a channel with a capacity of 579,000 cubic feet per second in Sacramento River below Cache Slough. In addition, discharges up to 21,000 cubic feet per second can be diverted from Sacramento River through Georgiana Slough. Completed major project items include about 977 miles of levees; five weirs with a combined discharge capacity of 602,000 cubic feet per second; two cutoff channels; two sets of outfall gates; channel improvement and clearing in Sacramento River, Butte Creek, Putah Creek, and Sutter and Tisdale Bypasses; construction of two main bypasses or floodways and secondary bypasses at Tisdale and Sacramento weirs and at Wadsworth Canal; construction of Knights Landing ridge cut and of Cache Creek settling basin; installation of gaging stations; and enlargement of Sacramento River below Cache Slough. Cutoffs at Collins Eddy and between Wild Irishman and Kinneys Bends were made in 1918 and 1919, respectively. Sacramento weir was completed in 1917, Fremont weir in 1924, Tisdale and Moulton weirs in 1932, and Colusa weir in 1933. Outfall gates at Knights Landing were constructed in 1930 and at mouth of Butte Slough in 1936. Pumping plants on Sutter Bypass were completed in 1944. Work items with reference to clearing, snagging, rectification of channels, and bank protection on Sacramento River and tributaries in Tehama County and from Red Bluff southerly, provided for by 1941 Flood Control Act were accomplished in fiscal years 1947, 1948, 1949, and 1951. Yolo Bypass and Cache Slouth (Unit 109) was completed in 1990. Work remaining comprises completion of levee stage construction Marysville/Yuba City Area levees; Mid-Valley Area; Lower Sacramento Area; and Upper Sacramento Area Levees. (See Table 35-CC for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1996.) 35-6A SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT TABLE 35-AA COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 1. Regulation of Hydraulic Mining and Preparation of Plans 2. Sacramento River and Tributaries. CA (Debris Control) (Contributed Funds Other) 3. Treatment of Yuba River Debris Situation Restraining Barries, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds, Other) 4. Sacramento River, CA including Sacramento River Flood Control Project (Federal Funds) (Contributed Maint. Approp. Cost New York Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New York Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New York Contrib. Cost New York Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work 821,325 821,325 952,741 782,352 1,287,915 1,215,220 877,077 1,277.023 1,277,023 925,127 29,000 22,524 4,500 307,000 530,000 14,287 179,182 322,815 56,000 70,008 3,700,000 235,326 61,310 1,329,635 218,084 245,765 92,000 55,419 5,093,999 12 5,093,999 12 17,221,962 3 16,918,015 4 323,420 5 315,777 6 361,482 361,482 2,689,531 7 2,354,432 7 1,053,904 1,053,904 361,777 361,777 1,897,338 1,865,183 1,053,904 1,053,904 36,000 s 34,000 80,739,471 9 78,562,784 9 1,979,104 1,979,104 35-7A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 35-AA (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 Fundsc Cnntrih - - - - 10 724 S in Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction (Federal Funds) (Required Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds, Other) Sacramento River Flood Control (G.C.I.D), CA (Federal Funds) Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost 10,724,085 o, 10,724,085 10 9,686 11 9,686 11 3,663,000 700,000 72,000 3,760,711 143,950 803,419 247,327 129,714 115,402 -101,735 200,000 147,387 -38,548 437,408 11,352 11,066 16,725 400,000 300,000 820,000 763,000 241,207 660,133 692,144 817,877 28,075,000 28,071,933 2,157,613 2,062,149 5,867,175 12 5,867,175 12 4,476,000 13 4,299,218 13 Sacramento N River Flood Control ( (Marysville/Yuba City Area levees). CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contributed ew Work Approp. Cost Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost (Contributed Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost Sacramento New Work River Flood Approp. Control Cost (Mid-Valley Area New Work Levee Reconstruction) Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost Sacramento 1,479,000 2,445,000 7,174,000 18,994,794 525,117 2,826,445 4,930,067 15,711,402 1,350,000 3,872,015 180,098 2,319,549 736,210 521,200 87,518 2,230,045 - 820,310 1,938,690 2,859,000 - 626,781 1,960,224 2,472,155 - 350,000 335,000 327,500 - - 357,952 502,623 New Work 35-8A 31,319,794 25,185,617 5,742,015 2,967,939 2,969,410 2,353,677 5,618,000 5,059,160 1,012,500 860,575 i ua.- ,J SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-AA (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 River Flood Approp. - 604,365 273,000 378,000 1,255,365 Control Cost - 485,276 352,102 389,522 1,226,900 (Lower Sacramento Area Levee Reconstruction) (Federal Funds) BE377 Sacramento New Work River Flood Approp. - - 354,000 572,226 926,206 Control Cost - - 319,791 490,759 810,000 (Upper Sacramento Area Levee Reconstruction) (Federal Funds) 1. Exclusive of $644,503 appropriation and cost on inactive portion of project. 2. Includes $477,127 for recreational facilities at North Fork ($32,473) and Harry L. Englebright ($414,654), Code 710 appropriations and costs. 3. Includes $15,414,051 from regular funds and $1,808,911 from Hydraulic Mining in California funds. 4. Includes $15,180,476 from regular costs and $1,737,540 from Hydraulic Mining in California costs. 5. Includes $12,420 contributed funds, other, from State of California Department of Navigation and Ocean Development for acquisition of a boarding float; and $311,000 funds from State of California Department of Boating and Waterways for refurbishing restrooms and launching facilities at Englebright Dam. 6. Includes $12,420 costs for acquisition of boarding float and $280,317 costs for refurbishing restrooms and launching facilities at Englebright Dam. 7. Includes deferred maintenance funds in amount of $207,500. 8. Miscellaneous engineering and construction accomplished at expense of local interests in connection with rehabilitation of Daguerre Point Dam necessitated by December 1964 floodflows. Includes $2,000 from Yuba County Water Agency in May 1994. 9. Includes appropriation and cost of $680,000 for new work for previous project and $1,486,469 public works funds for new work for existing project. 10. Includes $680,000 required contribution for previous project;$4,939,752 required contributed funds for existing project; and $310,801 voluntary contribution for bank protection for existing project. 11. Includes $9,686 required contributed funds for existing project. 12. Includes contributed funds, other, from the State of California for relocation of utilities, irrigation ditch, access ramps, and miscellaneous small structures in the Natomas, Greenhaven Pocket and West Sacramento areas. (Sacramento Urban Area). 13. G.C.I.D. construction funds received in FY 1991, but no costs were incurred. Includes $493,000 total funds and costs under General Investigations for Preconstruction Engineering and Design. 14. Not reflected in actual annual accounting records for Marysville/Yuba City are $1,710,000 costs for FY 91 and FY 92 incurred under Sacramento River Flood Control Project for design effort. These costs are considered part of Marysville/Yuba City cost-shared project. 35-9A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 35-BB AUTHORIZATION LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorization in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 1, 1983 Feb 27, 1907 Ex. Doc. 267, 51st Cong., 2d sess., Ex. Doc. 98, 47th Cong., 1S sess. i (Amendment of sec. 13, Act of Mar. 1, 1893.) i REGULATION OF HYDRAULIC MINING AND PREPARATION OF PLANS Created California Debris Commission and authorized: (a) Hydraulic mining under its regulation in drainage areas of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, if possible without injury to navigability of these river systems or to lands adjacent thereto; and (b) preparation of plans by Commission for improvement of navigability of these river systems, and flood and debris-control therein. Authorized California Debris Commission to permit hydraulic mining without construction of impounding works, provided there is no injury to navigability of above river systems or lands adjacent thereto. Amended act of Mar. 1, 1893, which provides for construction of debris dams or other restraining works by California Debris Commission and collection of a 3-percent tax on gross proceeds of each mine using such facilities, so as to eliminate this tax and substitute an annual tax per cubic yard mined, obtained by dividing total capital cost of each dam, reservoir, and rights-of-way, by total capacity of reservoir for restraint of debris; and authorized revocation of Commission orders permitting such mining, for failure to pay this annual tax within 30 days after its due date; and also authorized receipt of money advances, from mineowners to aid such construction, to be refunded later from annual payments of yardage taxes on material mined. Added at end of sec. 23 of above act, a provision that the Secretary of the Army is authorized to enter into contracts to supply storage for water and use of outlet facilities from debris-storage reservoirs for domestic and irrigation purposes and power development, upon such conditions of delivery, use, and payment as he may approve, these payments are to be deposited to credit of such reservoir project, reducing its capital cost to be repaid by tax on mining operations. Abolished the California Debris Commission and transferred all authorities, powers, functions, and duties to the Secretary of the Army. Authorized all 35-10A Sec. 1001, 1986 WRDA June 19, 1934 June 25, 1938 Nov. 17, 1986 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT TABLE 35-BB (Cont'd) AUTHORIZATION LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorization in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents acquired land and other interests presently under jurisdiction of the Commission to be retained and administered under direction of the Secretary. 4. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA H. Doc. 649, 78th Dec. 22, 1944 Additional levee construction and reconstruction, Cong., 2d sess., and And May 17, 1950 including levee protection of Upper Butte Basin, and 367, 81st Cong., multipurpose reservoirs. 2 1st sess. H. Doc. 272, 84th July 3, 1958 Bank protection and incidental channel improvements, Cong., 2d sess. Sacramento River from Chico Landing to Red Bluff, and local interests flood plain zoning above Chico Landing. 2 S. Doc. 103, 86th July 14, 1960 Bank protection works at critical locations, Cong., 2d sess. Sacramento River. 2 H. Doc. 533, 108th May 24, 1994 Acquiring and permanently restoring Little Holland Cong., 2d sess. Tract to tidal lands with seasonal and emergent marshlands would not only have substantial environmental benefits, but measurable flood control benefits as well. 1. For latest published map, see Annual Report for 1913, p. 3170, and Rivers and Harbors Committee Document 50, 74 th Cong., 1St sess. 2. This supplemental work is reported in detail under Sacramento District, Improvement No. 23. 35-11A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 35- CC SACRAMENTO RIVER CA: TOTAL COST EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 (See Section 4 of Text) Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular $74,143,882 $1,979,104 $76,122,986 Public Works 1,486,469 - 1,486,469 Total U.S. 75,630,351 1,979,104 77,609,455 Contributed Project Work 4,939,752 9,686 4,949,438 Contributed, Other 5,104,333 - 5,104,333 Total All Funds $85,674,436 1,988,790 $87,663,226 1. Includes $429,671 representing book value of plan purchased with previous project funds and transferred to existing project without reimbursement. 2. Excludes financial information for Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction, Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District (G.C.I.D.), Marysville/Yuba city Area Levee Reconstruction and Mid-Valley Area Levee Reconstruction, Lower Sacramento Area Levee Reconstruction and the Upper Sacramento Area Levee Reconstruction Projects, all authorized under the Sacramento River Flood control Project (See Table 35-AA). 35-12A ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT* The district comprises the watershed of the Canadian River and its tributaries in New Mexico; the watershed of Arkansas River and its tributaries in Colorado; the watershed of Rio Grande and its tributaries including the Pecos River and its tributaries upstream of Amistad Lake; and the San Juan River Basin in New Mexico; and the watersheds of the Gila, San Francisco and Mimbres Rivers and its tributaries in New Mexico. Note: The district watershed boundaries were revised in June 1986 to include the portion of New Mexico west of the Continental Divide. IMPROVEMENTS Flood Control 1. Acequias Irrigation System, NM ...... 2. Alamogordo, NM ................. 3. Alamosa, CO .................... 4. Conchas Lake, NM ................. 5. El Paso, TX .................... 6. John Martin Reservoir, CO .......... 7. Las Cruces, NM ................... 8. Rio Grande Basin, NM .............. 8A. Abiquiu Dam, NM ................ 8B. Cochiti Lake, NM .................. 8C. Galisteo Dam, NM ................. 8D. Jemez Canyon Dam, NM ............ 8E. Middle Rio Grande Flood Protection, Bernalillo to Belen, NM ............. 8F. Rio Grande Floodway, NM ........... 8G. San Acacia to Bosque del Apache Unit, NM ................... Page 36-1 36-2 36-2 36-2 36-3 36-4 36-4 36-4 36-5 36-6 36-6 36-7 36-7 36-7 36-8 Flood Control (Continued) 9. Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, NM ........ 10. Trinidad Lake, CO ................ 11. TwoRiversDam, NM............... 12. Inspection of completed flood control projects .................... 13. Scheduling flood control reservoir operations ................. 14. Other authorized flood control projects .................... 15. Flood control work under special authorizations ............... General Investigations 16. Surveys ......................... 17. Collection and study of basic data ...... 18. Environmental Data Studies .......... 19. Preconstruction Engineering and Design . Flood Control 1. Acequias Irrigation System, NM Location. There are about one thousand acequias throughout the state of New Mexico, most of which are located in north-central New Mexico. Proposed project. Authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Section 1113, the project 11 costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 36-1 Page 36-8 36-9 36-10 36-11 36-11 36-12 36-12 36-12 36-12 36-12 36-12 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 consists of about one thousand acequias throughout the state of New Mexico. These community ditch systems provide irrigation water to about 160,000 acres on an estimated 12,000 farms. Acequias have been in existence since the early Spanish Colonization period of the 17th and 18th Centuries and represent one of the oldest forms of cooperative institutions in the United States. They are an integral part of the culture and heritage of New Mexico. Diversion structures, many of which are constructed of available materials such as rock and brush, are frequently destroyed by flows greater than normal resulting from spring runoff or summer thunderstorms. Disruption of the ditches usually occurs during peak irrigation season and severely impacts crop production. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 directs the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to undertake measures, without regard to economic analysis, as are necessary to protect and restore the river diversion structures and associated canals. Local Cooperation. The local sponsor, the State of New Mexico, has a law whereby the State of New Mexico provides 17.5% of the project costs, and low interest loans to the local Acequias for the remaining 7.5%. The State of New Mexico has appropriated, and will appropriate on an annual basis, the funds necessary to meet the requirements of local sponsorship. Operation and results during fiscal year. Funds to initiate construction were received in Fiscal Year 1988. Construction contracts have been awarded in every year since FY 1988. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated and completed on one project in FY 1998: Los Trigos project in San Miguel County, N.M. was awarded in September 1997, and completed in May 1998. Design was completed on the Acequia de Chamita project in September 1998. 2. Alamogordo, NM Location. The project is located in south central New Mexico in Otero County, in and near Alamogordo, NM. The city is situated at the foot of the Sacramento Mountains near the eastern edge of the Tularosa Basin. Proposed Project. The authorized project consists of a concrete and rip-rap lined diversion channel with 100 year flow capacity, which will intercept flows from the Sacramento Mountains east of the City. For a description of the complete improvement and authorizing legislation see page 694 of Annual Report for 1966. Local Cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Operation and Results during fiscal year. The GRR, is to be approved by April 1999 with the PCA executed by July 1999. A design memorandum for all Railroad Relocation will begin in April 1999 and be completed by December 1999. Plans & Specifications for the South Diversion Channel Phase I will begin in April 1999. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. The District will be completing the Railroad DM & Phase I South Diversion Channel. The Local Sponsor will be acquiring easements for construction. 3. Alamosa, CO Location. The project lies in south central Colorado along the Rio Grande, in the community of Alamosa, CO. Project. The project consists of a levee system which replaced and augmented the existing spoil bank levees. (See Table 36-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1992 applies. Operation and results during fiscal year. Construction activities were completed, September 1998. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Construction complete. 4. Conchas Lake, NM Location. The dam is located in San Miguel County, NM, on the Canadian River, just below the confluence of the Canadian and Conchas Rivers. (See Geological Survey State map of New Mexico, scale 1:500,000, and Geological Survey topographic map, Tucumcari quadrangle, scale 1:250,000.) 36-2 Existing project. This dam consists of a concrete gravity main section 1,250 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet above streambed located in the Canadian River Canyon together with earth dikes on each side having an overall length of about 3.7 miles. The main section contains conduits in its base for the release of water from the reservoir, and an overflow, ungated spillway 300 feet long. The earth dikes vary in height up to 100 feet and the north dike contains a concrete ogee-type emergency spillway 3,000 feet long. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 513,900 acre-feet (198,170 for flood control, 254,200 for water conservation and irrigation, and 61,530 dead storage). The dam controls 7,409 square miles of drainage area. (See page 17-16 of Annual Report of 1973 for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None Required. Operations and results during fiscal year. The reservoir was operated for storage of floodwater and releases for irrigation purposes. Sediment damages of $125,100 were prevented during FY 1998. There were no flood damages prevented in FY 1998. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project through FY 1998 were $4,278,900. Estimated irrigation benefits for FY 1998 were $236,500. Estimated total accumulated irrigation benefits through FY 1998 were $10,947,000. The pool elevation at the start of FY 1998 was 4,198.57 feet with corresponding storage of 293,047 acre-feet. Total releases for this reporting period were 114,325 acrefeet. Releases of 111,836 acre-feet were made to Arch Hurley Conservancy District and 2,490 acre-feet to Bell Ranch and 0 acre feet to the Canadian River Channel. The pool elevation on September 30, 1998 was 4,191.52 feet with corresponding storage of 234,562 acre-feet. Sediment deposition during the fiscal year was 1,117 acre-feet. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was essentially complete in 1939. Irrigation of some lands downstream from the project began in November 1945. A cost sharing agreement between the Government and the State of New Mexico for additional Recreation Development at Conchas Lake was completed in August 1977. Costs of the facilities are 50 percent State of New Mexico and 50 percent Federal. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in FY 1978 and completed in FY 1983. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 5. El Paso, TX Location. The project is located at El Paso, El Paso County, TX, which is on the left bank of the Rio Grande in the reach that forms part of the international boundary between the United States and the Republic of Mexico. (Geological Survey map for El Paso, TX; New Mexico quadrangle, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. This project consists of a singlepurpose flood control system of detention dams, diversion dikes, conduits and channels to collect, regulate and discharge arroyo runoff into the Rio Grande. Runoff from the tributary arroyos on the eastern, southern, and western slopes of the adjacent Franklin Mountains often inundates sections of the city and its outlying suburban developments. The project is divided into three independent elements: Northwest area, Central area, and Southeast area. The project plan satisfies the 1933 U.S. and Mexico agreement on limited tributary discharge into the Rio Grande in El Paso, Texas. (See Table 36-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applied for the Northwest and Central areas. The Local Cooperation Agreement for the Southeast area reflects the cost sharing requirements contained in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Operations and results during fiscal year. Flood control dams in operation during FY 1998 and dates of completion of construction are as follows: Northgate and Range Dams (February 1973); Sunrise and Mountain Park Dams (October 1974); and Pershing Dam (March 1977); Fort Bliss Diversion Channel (November 1978); Oxidation Pond and Buena Vista Diversion and Oxidation Pond Outlet Conduit (November 1980); Mulberry and Thorn Drive Dams (June 1982); Mesa Dam (September 1982); McKelligon Canyon Dam (October 1982); Keystone Dam (September 1983); Keystone Outlet Conduit (March 1984); Highway Diversion Channel *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 36-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 (May 1985); Dam Safety Assurance Program to the existing Range and Northgate Dams (May 1986); Borderland Diversion Channel (September 1986); and Phelps Dodge Basin (January 1990), Americas Basin (Mar 93), and Bluff Channel Diversion (1998). During FY 1998 flood flows and flood control storage were minimal, however, damages which would have resulted from these flows were prevented. Condition at end of fiscal year. At the end of 1998, all work in Central and Northwest areas were complete. Construction was completed in January 1990 on the Phelps Dodge Basin, in June 1992 on Phelps Dodge Channel, in March 1993 on Americas Basin, in October 1998 on Bluff Channel. Construction is underway for the Lomaland System. 6. John Martin Reservoir, CO Location. The project is located on the Arkansas River, in Bent County, 1,159 miles upstream from its mouth, 300 miles downstream from its source, about 18 miles upstream from the city of Lamar, CO. (See Geological Survey maps for Lamar and Las Animas, CO quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. The project consists of a concrete and earthfill structure about 2.6 miles long with a maximum height of 106 feet above streambed and an overflow, gated spillway 1,174 feet long. Total capacity of the reservoir at the top of flood control is 605,115 acre-feet (259,417 for flood control and 345,698 for conservation and recreation storage). This reservoir controls a contributing drainage area of 18,130 square miles and is operated as a unit of the coordinated reservoir system for flood control in the Arkansas River Basin. Public Law 89-298 modified the act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1570) to authorize 10,000 acre-feet of reservoir flood control storage space for fish and wildlife and recreation purposes. For details of the completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 17-16 of Annual Report for FY 1973. Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. Regulation of conservation storage continued under rules and regulations of the Arkansas River Compact. Sediment damages of $329,400 were prevented during FY 1998. Estimated total flood and sediment damages prevented by this project through FY 1998 were $94,643,100. Estimated irrigation benefits for FY 1998 were $495,000. Estimated total accumulative irrigation benefits were $27,823,000. Maximum pool elevation of 3,852.02 feet with corresponding storage of 347,439 acre-feet occurred on April 19, 1998. Total releases for FY 1998 were 370,038 acre-feet. Releases attributed to irrigation benefits amounted to 125,958 acre-feet. Sediment deposition was 2,941 acre-feet in FY 1998. Condition at end of fiscal year. Storage and operation of the reservoir for irrigation began in March 1943. The project structures are in good condition and operational. 7. Las Cruces, NM Location. The project is located in Las Cruces, NM, 40 miles north of El Paso, TX. Proposed Project. The project is authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. The project consists of enlargement and modifications of two existing detention basins and a irrigation ditch in order to provide increased flood protection to the downtown commercial and residential district of Las Cruces. The proposed project will be constructed at an estimated cost of $8,800,000 ($6,600,000 Federal and $2,200,000 nonfederal) 1 Oct 96 price levels. Local Cooperation. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. The City of Las Cruces is the non- Federal Local sponsor. Operations and results during the fiscal year. Plans and specifications for the project were completed in March 1998. The construction contract for the project is scheduled to be awarded in August 1999. 8. Rio Grande Basin, NM Location. Improvements are located on the Rio Grande and tributaries in New Mexico. More definite locations and descriptions of individual projects are in following paragraphs and individual reports by projects. 36-4 Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1948 authorized the flood control phase of the comprehensive plan of development of water resources of the Rio Grande Basin in New Mexico (H. Doc 243, 81st Cong., 1st sess.) with the exception of Chiflo Dam and Reservoir and spillway gate structure at Chamita Dam. Although recommended, Chiflo Dam and Reservoir was deleted from the authorized plan. It was excluded without prejudice from future consideration by Congress. It was requested at that time, by the States of Colorado and Texas, that the project be deferred for restudy regarding required storage and methods of operation. By the same act, Congress also authorized for the construction irrigation phase of the comprehensive plan as recommended by the Bureau of Reclamation (H. Doc. 653, 81st Cong., 2nd sess.). The act also stipulated that work should be prosecuted in accordance with a joint agreement approved by the Secretary of the Army and Acting Secretary of the Interior on November 21, 1957. In addition, under that agreement the Bureau of Reclamation was given responsibility for construction, operation, and maintenance of channel rectification, and drainage rehabilitation and extension phases of the unified plan of improvement. Authority for the Chamita Dam and Reservoir was abrogated when Cochiti Dam and Reservoir was authorized. (See Table 36-B for authorizing legislation and Table 36-C for existing projects.) All operations and costs for projects contained in the authorized plan are reflected in individual reports on the following pages. 8A. Abiquiu Dam, NM Location. The project is one unit of the flood control plan for the Rio Grande and tributaries, New Mexico. Abiquiu Dam is located on the Rio Chama near the town of Abiquiu, NM, about 32 miles upstream from the confluence of Rio Chama and Rio Grande. (See Geological Survey Map for plan and profile of Rio Chama, NM, from mouth to mile 103, sheet 1, and Army Map Service, Aztec, NM; Colorado NJ 13-1, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam 1,540 feet long, 325 feet high, with a 12-foot diameter controlled outlet, and an uncontrolled spillway in a natural saddle about one mile north of the left abutment. The reservoir provides 568,000 acre-feet of flood control and sediment storage. Total capacity at the spillway crest is 1,198,500 acre-feet. For a detailed description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see Annual Report of 1973. A major rehabilitation project was completed in September 1980 and the recreation facilities were completed in FY 1981. A non-Federal hydropower plant was completed in 1990 by the County of Los Alamos. The capacity of this plant is 13.2 MW. Drainage adits were completed in 1990 to alleviate seepage problems in the north and south abutments. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. Storage and flows were regulated in accordance with Section 203, Flood Control Act of 1960. On October 1, 1997, the pool elevation was 6,215.61 feet. The maximum pool (6,219.11 feet) and storage (185,670 acre-feet) occurred on May 24, 1998. On September 30, 1998, the pool elevation was 6,211.00 feet with a corresponding storage of 154,053 acre-feet. There was 1,239 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1998. There were $0 in flood damages prevented during FY 1998. Sediment damages prevented were $138,723. Accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project since completion were $390,900,400 through FY 1998. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation in February 1963. The project structures are in good condition and operational. Abiquiu Dam is not equipped with Emergency Gates, however, provisions on initial construction were made for later installation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized construction of a set of emergency gates to increase safety and enhance flood and sediment 11 costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 36-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 control. Funds were appropriated under Construction General and in May 1997, construction of the gates commenced. Installation of the gates is in progress with scheduled completion in June 1999. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 8B. Cochiti Lake, NM Location. The dam is located at river mile 340 on the Rio Grande (river mile 0 being at the intersection of the New Mexico-Texas State line with international boundary at El Paso, TX), near Pueblo de Cochiti, which is about 50 miles upstream from Albuquerque, NM. (See Geological Survey Maps, Cochiti Dam, NM, quadrangle and Santo Domingo Pueblo, NM, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam about 5.4 miles long with a maximum height of 251 feet above streambed. The project extends generally in an east-west line across the Rio Grande to a point about 2 miles east of the Rio Grande and then southward across the Santa Fe River. An uncontrolled spillway with a 460-foot-long ogee-weir and a 160-foot notch 10.5 feet deep in the center is part of the embankment on the south side of the Santa Fe River. Operational releases for flood control and irrigation are made through a 3-barrel gated conduit in the left abutment on the Rio Grande. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 589,159 acre-feet at the spillway crest, of which 86,514 acre-feet is dedicated for recreation and sediment control. The project controls flood waters from a 11,695 square mile drainage area. For more improvement details see page 17-7 of Annual Report for 1980. See page 17-14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. The project was completed in June 1975. On October 1, 1997, the pool elevation was 5,340.28 feet with a corresponding storage of 56,642 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 5,343.86 feet with a storage of 61,775 acre-feet on May 25, 1998. On September 30, 1998 the pool elevation was 5,341.81 feet with a corresponding storage of 58,791 acre-feet. There was 1,012 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1998. There were $0 flood damages prevented during FY 1998. Sediment damages prevented were $113,300. Accumulated total damages prevented are $435,066,400. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The dam and appurtenances were placed in operation in 1975. The Cochiti Recreation area was completed in 1976, with the Visitors Center completed in 1977. The Tetilla Peak recreation area was completed in 1981. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 8C. Galisteo Dam, NM Location. The dam is located at river mile 12 on Galisteo Creek, a tributary of the Rio Grande. The reservoir will extend upstream from the dam for about 4 miles, near the village of Waldo, NM. (See Geological Survey Map,. San Pedro 1, NM quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam 2,820 feet long with a maximum height of 158 feet above the streambed. The outlet works consist of a 10- foot diameter uncontrolled outlet with maximum discharge capacity of 4,980 cubic feet per second with a pool at the spillway crest elevation. The dam was raised 7 feet and the spillway was widened 575 feet to provide adequate discharge capacity to accommodate the revised probable maximum flood. The dam safety modification contract was awarded in February 1998 and is scheduled to be complete in October 1999. The project has 79,600 acre-feet of flood control storage and 9,868 acre-feet of sediment space. For more details of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see page 17-17 of Annual Report for 1973. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. Operation of the project began on October 11, 1970. The reservoir was empty on October 1, 1997. No storage occurred during FY 1998. Peak instantaneous inflow was 1,440 c.f.s. and maximum outflow was 1,440 c.f.s. There was 7 acre-feet of sediment deposition during the year and the reservoir was empty on September 30, 1998. Sediment damages prevented during the FY were $800 totaling $160,200 through FY 1998. 36-6 Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation in October 1970. The project structures are in good condition and in operation. 8D. Jemez Canyon Dam, NM Location. The project is located in Sandoval County, NM, on the Jemez River about 2 miles upstream from the confluence of the Jemez River and the Rio Grande, about 5 miles northwest of Bernalillo, NM. (See Geological Survey map for Bernalillo quadrangle, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam 780 feet long with maximum height of 146.6 feet above streambed, and off-channel uncontrolled saddle spillway 400 feet wide, and a 13-foot diameter gated outlet in the left abutment with discharge capacity of 8,340 cubic feet per second with a pool at spillway crest elevation. The dam was raised 14.1 feet and the spillway widened 28 feet in 1986 and 1987 to provide adequate discharge capability to accommodate the revised probable maximum flood. The reservoir has a capacity of 100,485 acre-feet at spillway crest (73,000 acre-feet for flood control and 37,485 acre-feet for sediment control). For more detailed description of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see page 17-17 of Annual Report for 1973. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. On October 1, 1997, the pool elevation was 5,193.31 feet with a corresponding storage of 22,929 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 5,197.33 feet with a storage of 28,328 acre-feet on April 27, 1998. On September 30, 1998 the pool elevation was 5,194.08 feet with a corresponding storage of 23,923 acre-feet. The reservoir was regulated for sediment control during FY 1998. Sediment deposition during FY 1998 was 570 acre-feet. There were $0 flood damages prevented during FY 1998. Sediment benefits during FY 1998 were $63,800. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project through FY 1998 were $25,080,300. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation in October 1953. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 8E. Middle Rio Grande Flood Protection, Bernalillo To Belen, NM Location. The project is composed of 45 square miles of floodplain lying along the Rio Grande from the vicinity of Corrales to Belen, New Mexico. Proposed project. The project is authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The project consists of raising and rehabilitating 51.5 miles of levees to provide the 270-year level of protection, and the creation of 75 acres of wetlands from borrow areas within the bosque, and acquisition of 200 acres to satisfy fish and wildlife mitigation requirements. The proposed project will be constructed at an estimated total cost of $62,400,000 ($46,800,000 Federal and $15,600,000 non- Federal) 1 Oct 97 price levels. (See Table 36-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. The Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District is the local sponsor. Operations and results during fiscal year. The Project Cooperation Agreement for the Corrales Unit of the project was executed in July 1995. Construction of The Corrales Unit began in September 1996, and was completed in July 1997. A Limited Reevaluation report is underway for the Belen Unit and is scheduled to be completed in 1999. 8F. Rio Grande Floodway, NM Location. This project is one unit of the flood control phase of the comprehensive plan of improvement for the Rio Grande Basin in New Mexico. It is located on the Rio Grande and covers a section of the river commencing near Truth or Consequences (formerly Hot Springs) at about river mile 123 and extends upstream to Espaflola, NM, about river mile 394. (See Table 36-D on Rio Grande Floodway.) *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 36-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Existing project. This project consists of flood protection and major drainage improvements by channel rectification, levee enlargement and construction, and bank stabilization work where needed to protect the levees. Construction of the project is a joint undertaking by the Bureau of Reclamation and the Corps. Portions to be done by the Corps will consist of levee enlargement, construction, of bank protection work, with channel-rectification and drainagerehabilitation work being the responsibility of Bureau of Reclamation. Levees constructed by local interests exist throughout the reach of the river involved, but are not uniform as to grade, section, or standard of construction, and in many places are threatened by the meandering river. (See Table 36-D on existing project and Table 36-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. In addition to the usual requirements, local interests are responsible for all highway, bridge, and public utility relocations or replacements required in construction of the project. Local interests will also be required to comply with requirements of Section 221, 1970 Flood Control Act, Section 401, 1986 Water Resource Development Act, and PL 91-646 Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1970. Total costs for all requirements for the completed Albuquerque unit under terms of project authorization were $75,000. There were no non-Federal costs in connection with the construction of the Cochiti to Rio Puerco unit of floodway. The Espaflola Valley unit was in the deferred category. However, by letter dated 11 November 1998 the City has requested a feasibility study be completed to address river and tributary flooding in Espailola. Negotiations are underway to identify a non-Federal source of funds to cost share in the study. It is anticipated the study can begin in October 1999 and be completed in 2001. For more details see page 17-8 of Annual Report for 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. There were no flood damages prevented by the completed floodway project during FY 1998. Estimated total accumulated flood damages prevented by the floodway project through FY 1998 amounted to $48,471,700. The peak flow of the Rio Grande through the middle valley was 4,891 c.f.s. at Albuquerque on May 26, 1998. The peak at San Acacia was 5,702 c.f.s. on July 28, 1998. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the Albuquerque unit of the Rio Grande Floodway project is complete. The General Design Memorandum for the Bernalillo to Belen unit was completed in June 1986. The General Design Memorandum for the San Acacia to Bosque del Apache unit was approved in August 1990. Construction was completed on the Truth or Consequences Unit in fiscal year 1991. 8G. San Acacia to Bosque Del Apache Unit, NM Location. The project is located along the Rio Grande, extending from the upper end of the Rio Grande low-flow conveyance channel at the San Acacia diversion works to the head of Elephant Butte Reservoir. Proposed project. The project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1948. The project consists of the reconstruction of 42 miles of existing spoil bank levee which separates the Rio Grande low-flow conveyance channel from the cleared floodway. The proposed project will be constructed at an estimated total cost of $65,850,200 ($57,107,730 Federal and $8,231,275 non- Federal) 1 Oct 98 price levels. (See Table 36-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 apply. The Water Resources Development Act of 1992 modified the Local Sponsor's required contribution. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction has been postponed while preparation of a supplemental EIS is completed. The Supplemental EIS was required when two species, found within the project area, were submitted and listed as endangered species. The proposed plan remains the same with features added to address alternatives recommended by USFWS under the Endangered Species consultation. The supplemental EIS is scheduled for completion in October 1999. 9. Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, NM Location. The project is located on a lake in Guadalupe County, on Pecos River, at river mile 766.4 approximately 7 miles north of Santa Rosa, NM. (See U.S. 36-8 Geological Survey map, Corazon, NM, sheet, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. Operation of the project began in November 1979. It consists of an earth and rock fill dam 1,950 feet long and 212 feet maximum height above the streambed. The purposes of the project are flood control, irrigation and sediment retention. An unlined, open rock cut about 1,000 feet back from the left abutment serves as an uncontrolled spillway. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consists of a control tower, intake structure with gates, and a 10-foot diameter concrete lined tunnel with a terminal flip bucket energy dissipator. Storage capacity at the spillway crest is 439,860 acre-feet which includes 72,860 acre-feet sediment reserve, 200,000 acre-feet irrigation and 167,000 acre-feet flood control storage. The surface area of the reservoir at the spillway crest is 10,594 acres. The contributing drainage area at the dam site is 2,434 square miles. For a more detailed report of the authorized project including the modification to existing Sumner Lake see page 17-8 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. For authorizing legislation see page 17-14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperation. In addition to first costs, operation and maintenance of both reservoirs is the responsibility of the Federal Government; however, the Carlsbad Irrigation District is required to contribute to operation and maintenance costs an equal amount to what they now pay toward Sumner Lake. The Carlsbad Irrigation District also agreed to use Sumner Lake for flood control. Because they realize equivalent benefits from storage capacity in Santa Rosa Lake, they will continue to fulfill their repayment obligation. The New Mexico Division of Parks manages the recreation facilities. Activities include camping, picnicking, boating and hiking. For more requirements and details on final approval in 1974 for transfer of irrigation storage from Sumner Lake to Santa Rosa Dam and Lake (formerly Los Esteros Lake) see page 17-5 of Annual Report for 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. Pool elevation at the start of the fiscal year was 4,743.39 feet with storage of 91,306 acre-feet. Total releases for the fiscal year were 139,556 acre-feet. Pool elevation on September 30, 1998 was 4,717.07 acre-feet with a storage of 26,982 acre-feet. The maximum elevation was 4,744.97 feet with a storage of 96,963 acre-feet on January 28, 1998. There was 475 acre-feet of sediment deposition during the fiscal year. There were $0 flood damages prevented in FY 1998. Sediment damages prevented during the fiscal year were $53,200. Releases attributed to irrigation benefits were 111,867 acre-feet. Irrigation benefits for the fiscal year were $391,500 with an accumulative total of $3,373,100 through FY 1998. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in late 1979 and reservoir operation for irrigation was started in March 1980. Construction of the recreation area was completed in October 1980. Design studies for spillway modification were initiated in FY 1979 and construction was completed in FY 1982. The project structures are in good condition and in operation. 10. Trinidad Lake, CO Location. This project is located on the Purgatorie River about 161 miles above its junction with the Arkansas River. The project is about 4 miles upstream from the city of Trinidad, CO. (See Geological Survey map, Trinidad, CO, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The project consists of an earthfill dam 6,610 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet above the streambed, an uncontrolled spillway 1,000 feet wide in the left abutment, and a 10-foot diameter, gatecontrolled conduit in the right abutment with discharge capacity of 5,800 c.f.s. with a water surface at top of the flood control pool. In 1985, a 3-foot high parapet wall on top of the upstream face of the dam and a supplemental 700-foot wide rock cut emergency spillway located on the right abutment were constructed to provide adequate discharge capability and freeboard allowance to accommodate the revised probable maximum flood. In 1989 the recreation pool was increased from 4,500 to 15,967 acrefeet, utilizing some originally unallocated space in the *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 36-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 project. The reservoir provides for storage of 51,000 acre-feet for flood control, 36,284 acre-feet for sediment, 20,000 acre-feet for irrigation, and 15,967 acre-feet for recreation, a total of 124,463 acre-feet. The reservoir controls a drainage area of 671 square miles and is operated for flood and sediment control, irrigation, and recreation purposes. For authorizing legislation see page 17-14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation received from City of Trinidad and Purgatorie River Water Conservancy District were formally accepted May 11, 1967, after execution of irrigation repayment contract. For complete details of requirements and costs pertaining to the execution of the irrigation repayment contract and the addition of permanent storage for recreation facilities see page 17-9 of fiscal year 1980 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. On October 1, 1997 the pool elevation was 6,170.41 feet with a corresponding storage of 15,166 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 6,194.72 feet with a corresponding storage of 32,304 acre-feet on May 14, 1998. On September 30, 1998 the pool elevation was 6,167.33 feet with a corresponding storage of 13,520 acre-feet. Sediment deposition during FY 1998 was 127 acre-feet. Sediment damages prevented during FY 1998 was $47,500. Accrued sediment benefits are $2,549,400. Irrigation benefits for FY 1998 were $87,100. Accrued irrigation benefits through FY 1998 were $2,014,400. Irrigation benefit releases for the year were 22,173 acre-feet. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation in 1977. The recreation facilities were completed in 1980. The Dam Safety Assurance Contract was completed in May 1983. The project structures are in good condition and in operation. 11. Two Rivers Dam, NM Location. The project is located about 14 miles southwest of Roswell, NM on the Rio Hondo and the Rocky Arroyo. The Rio Hondo is formed at the confluence of the Rio Ruidoso and the Rio Bonito, near the village of Hondo, NM, in the foothills region east of Sierra Blanca in the southeastern part of Lincoln County, NM, and flows generally easterly to its confluence with the Pecos River near Roswell, NM. (See Geological Survey map, Hondo Reservoir quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The Two Rivers project consists of two dams: Diamond "A" and Rocky. The Diamond "A" Dam is an earthfill structure, 4,885 feet long and 98 feet high, with a gated outlet. The Rocky Dam is an earthfill structure 2,940 feet long and 118 feet high with an uncontrolled outlet. No provision is made for water storage, except for flood control. Flood releases will be controlled so that flows through Roswell will not exceed the Rio Hondo channel capacity which is about 600 c.f.s. A Dam Safety Reconnaissance Report, approved in June 1995, identified need to increase the size of the spillway on the left abutment of the Rocky Dam by 1,170 feet in order to accommodate the revised Probable Maximum Flood flows for the Dam. The spillway was widened 1,170 feet in 1998 to provide adequate discharge capability to accommodate the revised probable maximum flood. The capacity of the Two Rivers Reservoir at its spillway crest is 163,775 acre-feet, of which 13,775 acre-feet are provided for sediment reserve. Together these dams regulate runoff from 1,027 square miles of drainage area. For details of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 17-18 of Annual Report for 1973. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies and compliance is satisfactory. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. The reservoir was empty on October 1, 1997. There were $0 of flood damages prevented during 1998. Sediment damages prevented were $900. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented through FY 1998 were $190,604,600. There were 8 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1998. The accrued sediment benefits through FY 1998 are $1,107,400. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation July 1963. The project structures are in good condition and in operation. 36-10 12. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects Included under this heading is inspection of completed flood control projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Projects in Texas, Colorado, and New Mexico were inspected. Federal costs for fiscal year 1998 were $151,408. 13. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations Pursuant to Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, five projects are operated by others for flood control. These projects are Platoro, Pueblo, Sumner, Navajo, and Brantley Dams. Platoro Dam on the Conejos River above the town of Platoro, Conejos County, CO controls runoff from 40 square miles of high mountain area. The authorized purposes are irrigation storage and flood control. Platoro is operated by the Conejos Water Conservancy District. Total storage is 59,571 acre-feet with the top 6,000 acre-feet solely for flood control. The 53,571 acre-feet is joint use storage with flood control on a forecast basis during spring runoff. Platoro Dam was authorized by the Interior Appropriation Act of 1941. (See H Doc 693, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess.) Construction of this project was completed by the Bureau of Reclamation in 1952. On October 1, 1997 storage in Platoro Reservoir was 32,211 acre-feet at elevation 10,001.70 feet. Maximum storage of 37,513 acre-feet at elevation 10,008.77 feet occurred on June 23, 1998. On September 30, 1998, storage was 21,849 acre-feet at elevation 9,986.09 feet. There were $0 flood damages prevented by the project during FY 1998. Total flood damages prevented to date are at $6,094,200. Total cost for activity, by the Corps of Engineers, during FY 1998 was $20,995. Pueblo Dam is part of the Fryingpan-Arkansas project which was authorized under Public Law 87-590, 87th Congress, HR 2206 on August 16, 1962. The project was completed in August 1975. Pueblo is operated by the Bureau of Reclamation and is located at river mile 1,293.7 on the Arkansas River in Pueblo County, Colorado. Pueblo Reservoir has a total capacity of 349,940 acre-feet at top of the flood pool with 27,000 acre-feet exclusive flood space and 66,000 acre-feet joint use space. Operation of Pueblo Reservoir began on February 10, 1974. Storage on October 1, 1997 was 199,826 acre-feet, elevation 4,866.88 feet. Maximum storage during the year was 257,872 acre-feet at elevation 4,880.69 feet on March 27, 1998. Storage on September 30, 1998 was 147,853 acre-feet at elevation 4,852.06 feet. There were $0 in flood damages prevented in FY 1998. Total flood damages prevented to date are $6,538,200. Total cost for FY 1998 activity, by the Corps of Engineers, was $23,179. Sumner Dam is located on the Pecos River at river mile 710.8 in DeBaca County, New Mexico. Sumner Dam was authorized as Alamogordo Dam by the Secretary of the Interior under a Finding of Feasibility approved by the President of the USA on 6 November 1935, under the Federal Reclamation laws. The original project was completed in 1937. Modification work of raising the dam 16 feet, adding a spillway and limiting the service spillway floor to 56,000 c.f.s. was completed in 1957. A twenty-four inch bypass line was installed in 1977 to pass flows less than 100 c.f.s. Sumner is operated by the Carlsbad Irrigation District. Storage on October 1, 1997 was 37,070 acre-feet at elevation 4,258.50 feet. Maximum storage for FY 1998 was 42,039 acre-feet at elevation 4,260.38 feet on February 28, 1998. Storage on September 30, 1998 was 8,892 acre-feet at elevation 4,241.65 feet. Total cost for FY 1998 activity, by the Corps of Engineers, was $20,990. Navajo Dam and Reservoir is located on the San Juan River at river mile 298.6 in San Juan County, New Mexico. Navajo Dam was authorized as part of a Colorado River Storage Project by an act of 84th Congress, 11 April 1956 (PL 485). The Bureau of Reclamation constructed and is responsible for operation of the project. Construction was initiated in June 1958 and the project was completed and placed in operation in March 1963. Total capacity at spillway crest is 1,708,600 acre-feet. The project controls a drainage area of 3,230 *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 36-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 square miles. Storage on October 1, 1997 was 1,543,600 acre-feet, elevation 6,074.47 feet. Maximum storage for FY 1998 was 1,583,800 acre-feet, elevation 6,077.24 feet on November 15, 1997. Storage on September 30, 1998 was 1,380,000 acre-feet, elevation 6,062.51 feet. Total Corps of Engineers cost for FY 1998 activity was $21,212. Brantley Dam on the Pecos River above the town of Carlsbad in Eddy County, NM controls runoff from 13,208 square miles of uncontrolled area. The authorized purposes are irrigation, flood control, fish and wildlife and recreation and for the elimination of the hazards of failure of the McMillan and the Avalon Dams. The total storage is 348,544 acre-feet with 189,700 acre-feet for flood control. The Brantley Dam was authorized for construction on 20 October 1972 by Public Law 92-514 with the cost ceiling raised for the project in October 1980 by Public Law 96-375. On September 6, 1988 the conduits were closed and Brantley Dam started its initial filling. On September 30, 1997, the storage was 35,647 acre-feet at elevation 3,251.45 feet. Total Corps of Engineers cost for FY 1998 activity was $22,083. 14. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects See Table 36-D. 15. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Costs during FY 1998 were: Little Puerco River, Gallup, NM, $130,557; Zuni River at Zuni, NM, $11,827; Raton Creek, Raton, NM $2,062.. Emergency flood control activities; repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) There were no Federal costs in FY 1998 for advance preparation, none for flood emergency operations, and there were no repair and restoration costs. Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) State Road 44, Rio Puerco, NM, $1,232, Section 14 Coordination Account $8,219, and Big House Ruin, Manuelito Canyon, $29,130; Hwy75 Embudo CK Rio Arriba, NM $(12,635); Isidro ED Santa Fe River, NM $39,531; Pump Station Riofern De Taso $293; Mora Sewage Lagoons, NM $55; Rio Puerco River, I-40 Bride, Gallup, NM $66,569; Unnamed Arroyo, Hwy 371 near Crown Point $56,866; Cibola County Road 7, Cubero, NM $13,560; Paseo del Norte, Albuquerque, NM $4,620. Snagging and Clearing for Flood Control (Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act, 83rd Cong.) Gallinas River Las Vegas, NM $67. General Investigations 16. Surveys Costs for the fiscal year were $(12,540) for flood damage prevention studies, $228,532 for special studies (coordination studies with other agencies). 17. Collection and Study Of Basic Data Fiscal year costs were $396,541 for flood plain management and technical services. Hydrologic studies involving collection and study of basic data, such as stream flow data, collection of suspended sediment samples, recording rain gage data, special study for Pikes Peak flood warning systems, hydrometeorological studies, sedimentation studies, and environmental data studies continued. Costs during the fiscal year were $7,924. 18. Environmental Data Studies There were no Environmental Data Study costs for FY 1998. 19. Preconstruction Engineering and Design Continuation of Engineering and Design costs in FY 1998 were $75,177. 36-12 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sent. 30. 1998 1. Acequias Irrigation System, NM 2. Alamogordo, NM 3. Alamosa, CO 4. Albuquerque Diversion Channels Project, NM (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) (Other Contributed Funds) 5. Conchas Lake, NM 6. El Paso, TX 7. John Martin Reservoir 8. Las Cruces, NM New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 2,104,000 1,458,000 397,000 361,948 1,023,000 319,160 100,000 36,758 1,245,000 1,331,911 3,788,000 4,470,823 1,961,900 2,140,246 113,000 76,000 1,234,832 322,000 375,725 550,000 537,939 15,499 1,500,705 1,481,417 946,000 480,301 695,000 454,350 95,000 672,906 94,000 506,128 456,000 633,840 2,998,000 2,725,875 1,189,295 1,194,201 1,084,458 1,317,562 (1,424,653) 4,878,422 2,038,809 6,507,234 1,480,200 1,448,594 82,050 158,833 1,398,000 1,382,201 405,000 355,964 6,997,000 5,702,520 1,718,135 1,703,666 550,000 420,796 11,479,000' 10,849,353' 4,676,000 4,625,965 5,700,0002 5,062,6802 17,975,450 17,762,795 518,356 518,356 854,664 854,664 13,821,499' 13,821,499' 25,027,720 24,990,254 99,924,000' 98,425,713' 15,555,358' 15,555,358' 33,947,153 33,869,151 1,050,0506 935,5936 *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 36-13 TABLE 36-A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 36-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sept. 30. 1998 8. Rio Grande Basin, NM 8A. Abiquiu Dam, NM 8B. Cochiti Lake, NM 8C. Galisteo Dam, NM 8D. Jemez Canyon Dam, NM 8E. Middle Rio Grande Flood Protection, Bernalillo to Belen, NM 8F. Rio Grande Floodway 8G. Rio Grande Floodway, San Acacia to Bosque del Apache, NM New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 249 1,232,400 1,529,197 1,619,200 1,708,016 166,400 170,343 402,600 421,531 3,199,000 670,703 (4,858,000) 369,005 400,000 281,719 1,322,000 1,253,097 1,725,000 1,577,321 265,000 143,405 202,100 185,311 326,000 294,323 890,737 (200,000) 454,646 646,000 304,181 1,420,600 1,227,406 1,837,400 1,743,874 292,000 309,791 250,300 258,210 504,000 380,767 1,231,000 3.842,369 545,000 570,839 2,840,000 2,816,446 1,322,320 1,576,201 1,876,600 2,123,835 2,975,000 2,810,773 245,335 253,895 477,000 635,640 562,000 544,144 293,000 309,015 30,901,028 26,417,623 36,758,524 36,725,678 96,956,559 96,956,559 28,526,167 28,495,498 17,807,053 17,539,022 3,772,059 3,764,796 6,293,972 6,293,972 10,813,732 10,806,628 8,667,0007 8,503,528' 4,794,868' 4,794,868' 4,213,0009 4,144,4329 36-14 (Continued) See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sept. 30. 1998 9. Santa Rosa Dam New Work & Lake, NM Approp. - - - - 41,039,741 Cost - - - 41,039,056 Maint. Approp. 739,000 933,999 926,501 728,388 12,165,024 Cost 798,238 836,303 853,186 875,497 12,124,156 10. Trinidad Lake, CO New Work Approp. - - - - 55,774,758 Cost - - - 55,774,758 Maint. Approp. 525,000 435,700 601,000 493,800 9,626,029 Cost 584,930 376,182 568,476 584,626 9,617,558 11. Two Rivers Dam, New Work NM Approp. - 220,000 237,000 1,475,000 6,779,244 Cost - 192,550 179,237 1,483,615 6,702,646 Maint. Approp. 177,000 350,000 304,000 304,000 5,157,033 Cost 184.559 325,.855 155.317 317.039 5,146.923 'Reflects PED funding appropriations beginning in FY 1986. 'Excludes $59,977 emergency relief funds for new work. Includes $30,000 for include non-Federal contributions of $2,412,000. 710. zPED activities were initiated in FY 1991. 3Includes $3,492,696 maintenance and improvement costs and $869,978 for emergency relief excludes $2,279,326, cost of initiating project under the authority of Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935 and $222,669, the cost for work performed with funds transferred to the Corps under Public Works acceleration Act of 1962. 4Does not include non-Federal contributions of $2,657,653. 6Includes $514,741 PED funds. 'Includes $1,177,000 PED funds. 'Includes funds for preconstruction planning of Espanola Valley unit. Ex $1,000,011 appropriated funds transferred to Bureau of Reclamation memorandum of agreement between that agency and the Corps. 9Includes $1,658,000 PED funds. *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 36-15 TABLE 36-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 36-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing InText Act 1. Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 12, 1996 Oct. 31, 1992 6. Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 12,1996 Jun. 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Nov. 17, 1986 Sep. 30, 1997 Project and Work Authorized D ACEQUIAS IRRIGATION SYSTEM An Irrigation System dating back to the eighteenth century with significant engineering works in the settlement and development of the western portion of the United States. Restoration and preservation ofthis system has cultural and historic values to the region. Measures are necessary to restore and protect the river division structures and associated canals. Except that the Federal share of reconnaissance studies carried out by the Secretary under this section shall be 100 percent. ALAMOSA, COLORADO Authorized a flood control project for Alamosa, Colorado. EL PASO, TX A single-purpose flood control system of detention dams, diversion dikes and channels to collect, regulate and discharge arroyo runoff in the Rio Grande. Consists of four independent units (NW Area, Central Area, and two units, Copper System and Bluff Channel of the SE Area.) LAS CRUCES, NM The project for flood control, Las Cruces, New Mexico: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 24, 1996, at total of $8,278,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $5,494,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $2,784,000. RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM Authorized to be appropriated $3,500,000 to be expended by the Dept. of the Army for partial accomplishment of approved general comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin in NM and Colorado. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $39,000,000 for Department of the Army for prosecution of comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin. Authorized Cochiti Dam on Rio Grande and Galisteo Dam on Galisteo Creek as additions to authorized comprehensive plan for Rio Grande Basin (Cochiti Dam was authorized in lieu of Low Chamita Dam of Chamita Reservoir Project on Rio Chama under "substitute plan"). Also authorized to be appropriated an additional $58,300,000 for Dept. of the Army for this addition to comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin. Authorized installation of the Abiquiu Dam Emergency Gates by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) The emergency gate construction project for Abiquiu Dam, New Mexico, authorized by section 1112 ofthe Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662, 100 Stat. 4232) is modified to authorize the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, to construct the project at an estimated total cost of $7,000,000. The non-Federal share of the project shall be 25 percent of those costs of the project attributable to an increase in flood protection as a result of the installation of such gates. )ocuments Public Law 662, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. (Sec. 1113) Public Law 104-30 104th Cong., (Sec. 334) Public Law 102-580 102d Congress (Sec. 101) H. Doc. 207, 89th Cong., lsess. 1 Public Law 104-303 104 Congress (Sec. 101) H. Doc. 243, 81st Cong.,lst sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2" sess. S. Doc. 94, 86th Cong. Public Law 662 99th Cong., 2nd sess. Public Law 104-206 (Se 112) 36-16 TABLE 36-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Proiect and Work Authorized Documents 9E. Nov. 17, 1986 MIDDLE RIO GRANDE FLOOD PROTECTION, BERNALILLO TO BELEN, NM Authorized project for flood control, Middle Rio Grande Flood Protection, Bernalillo to Belen, NM. Authorized increase of flood protection through the dredging of the bed of the Rio Grande in the vicinity ofAlbuquerque, NM to an elevation lower than existed on the date of enactment of this Act The project shall include the establishment of 75 acres of wetlands for fish and wildlife habitat and the acquisition of 200 acres of land for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses. RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, NM Channel rectification, levee enlargement and construction, and bank stabilization on Rio Grande between river mile 123 and 394 (San Acacia to Bosque Del Apache Unit.) RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, SAN ACACIA TO BOSQUE DEL APACHE UNIT, NM Modified the cost sharing to more equitably reflect the non-Federal contribution for the project by that percentage ofbenefits which is attributable to the Federal properties; except that, for purposes of this subsection, Federal property benefits may not exceed 50 percent of the total project benefits. Public Law 662, 99th Con&, 2nd sess. Cong., 1st sess.' an Public Law 516, 81 Cong., 2nd sess. Public Law 102-580 102d Congress (Sec. 102(e)) *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 36-17 9F. 9G. Jun. 30, 1948 and May 17, 1950 Oct. 31, 1992 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 36-C RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM: EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 8 of Text) Miles Drainage Total Above Nearest Area (square Estimated Project River Mouth Town mile) Description Cost Abiquiu Dam Rio Chama 32 Espaflola, 2,147 Earthfill 325 feet high, 30,901,0283 NM 1,212,000 acre feet capacity Jemez Canyon Jemez Dam 2 Bernalillo 1,034 Earthfill 136 feet high, 106,100 6,293,972 NM acre-feet capacity Rio Grande Rio Grande 123 - - Channel rectification, levee 25,744,0002 Floodway to 394' enlargement and construction Cochiti Lake Rio Grande 340' Cochiti, NM 11,695 Earthfill 251 feet high, 596,300 96,956,559 acre-feet capacity Galisteo Dam Galisteo Creek 8 Waldo, NM 596 Earthfill 164 feet high, 89,000 17,807,053 acre-feet capacity 'River mile 0 is at intersection of New Mexico-Texas State Line with international boundary at El Paso, Texas. 2Does not include non-Federal costs. 3Includes $5,383,000 major rehabilitation, $138,900 for recreation facilities and $3,600,000 for emergency gates. TABLE 36-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30. 1998 Full Report See Annual Operation & Project Report For Construction Maintenance Alamogordo Diversion Channel, Tularosa (closed) Basin, New Mexico 1966 189,356 - Alpine, Texas3 1977 130,488 - Cibolo Creek, Texas' 1983 829,500 - Cochiti Wetfields, New Mexico 1994 13,921,290 - Colorado Springs, Fountain que Bouille River, Colorado (Templeton Gap Floodway)' 1959 881,262 - Creede, Willow Creek, Colorado (floodway)' 1952 219,789 - Fountain Creek, Pueblo, Colorado' 1993 6,564,399 - Highway 12, Colorado' 1985 120,500 - Holly, Colorado' 1985 2,021,400 - Las Animas, Colorado2 1980 4,956,000 - Las Cruces, New Mexico2 1980 4,815,236 - Pecos, Texas3 1977 480,273 - Pinon Canyon Dam, Trinidad, Colorado (Sec.212)' - 130,678 - Pueblo, Arkansas River, Colorado (floodway levee extension)' 1954 201,958 - Puerco River, Gallup, New Mexico' 1993 4,678,239 - Rio Grande Floodway, T or C Unit, New Mexico' 1994 12,955,052 - Santa Fe River and Arroyo Mascaras, New Mexico3 1983 1,123,900 - Smith Creek, Colorado' 1985 219,000 - Socorro Diversion Channel. Tributaries of Rio Grande. New Mexico' 1965 2,259.328 . 'Completed. 2Responsibility of local interests. 3lnactive. 4Deferred. 36-18 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT * LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS The civil works portion of this District covers an area of approximately 36,414 square miles in northern, western, and southwestern Arkansas and a portion of Missouri. This area is within the Arkansas River, Little River, and White River basins. In the Arkansas River Basin, the District is responsible for planning, design, construction, operation and maintenance of the navigation portion of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation (MKARNS ). The District is also responsible for the areas included in the Arkansas River drainage basin from above Pine Bluff, AR, to below the mouth of the Poteau River, near Fort Smith, AR. In Littie River Basin, the District is responsible for the portion of the Little River and its tributaries that are in the state of Arkansas above its mouth near Fulton, AR. In the White River Basin, the District is responsible for those portions in southern Missouri and northern and eastern Arkansas in the White River drainage basin and its tributaries above Peach Orchard Bluff, AR. The Memphis District is responsible for navigation maintenance on the White River below Newport, AR, to the mouth of Wild Goose Bayou, in Arkansas County, AR. The White River downstream from the mouth of Wild Goose Bayou is part of MKARNS. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 2 1. Arkansas River Basin, Ar, Ok, And Ks ............... 2 2. Arthur V. Ormond Lock & Dam (No.9), Ar......... 3 3. Mcclellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, Bank Stabilization & Channel Rectification, Ar .............................................. 3 4. David D. Terry Lock And Dam (No. 6), Ar......... 3 5. Emmett Sanders Lock And Dam, Ar ............... 3 6. James W. Trimble Lock And Dam (No. 13), Ar .. 3 7. Lock No. 2 And Wilbur D. Mills (No. 2), Ar.......4 8. Joe Hardin Lock And Dam (No. 3), Ar.............4 9. Lock And Dam No. 5, Ar ................................. 4 10. Murray Lock And Dam (No. 7), Ar ..................... 4 11. Norrell Lock And Dam (No. 1) And Entrance Channel, Ar ..................................... .... 4 12. Toad Suck Ferry Lock And Dam (No. 8), Ar ....... 5 13. Maintenance And Repair Fleet And Marine Term inals, A r ................................................. 5 14. Other Authorized Navigation Projects .............. 5 15. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization.... 5 Flood Control 5 16. Black River, Poplar Bluff, Mo ......................... 5 17. Blue M ountain Lake, Ar ..................................... 5 18. Cato Springs Branch And Town Branch, Fayetteville, Ar .................... .... .................. 6 19. Clearwater Lake, M o ................................ .... 6 20. Dequeen Lake, Ar....................... 6 21. Dierks Lake, Ar ..................................... 7 22. Dry Jordan Creek, Harrison, Ar ....................... 7 23. Fourche Bayou Basin, Little Rock, Ar ................. 7 24. Gillham Lake, Ar ............................................. 7 25. Little River Basin, Ar ......................................... 8 26. Mill Creek, Fort Smith, Ar .............................. 8 27. M illwood Lake, Ar .................... ..................... 8 28. Nimrod Lake, Ar .......................................... 8 29. White River Basin (Little Rock District), Ar & M o ....................... ..... ...... . ......... 9 30. White River, Batesville, Ar... ................ 9 31. White River, Jacksonport, Ar ........................... 10 32. Inspection Of Completed Flood Control Projects ........ ........... ........... 10 33. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects........... 10 34. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ..................................... 10 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 10 35. Beaver Lake, Ar .................... ................ 10 36. Bull Shoals Lake, Ar ..................................... 11 37. Dardanelle Lock And Dam (No. 10), Ar......... 12 38. Greers Ferry Lake, Ar.................... ................. 12 39. Norfork Lake, Ar ........................................... 13 40. Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock And Dam (No. 12), A r ........................ ... ............................ 13 41. Table Rock Lake, M o ....................................... 13 General Investigations 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 14 Surveys............................... 14 Preconstruction Engineering & Design (Ped). ... 14 Collection And Study Of Basic Data ............... 14 Nimrod Waterfowl Levee.................................. 15 Nimrod Fisheries Restoration ........................ 15 Morgan Point Bendway Closure Structure, Desha County, A r ....................................................... 15 Arkansas River, Little Rock Port, Ar.............. 16 Frog Bayou, Crawford County, Ar.................. 16 Cornstalk Branch, Judsonia, Ar.................... 16 Hester, Heartsill And Adamson Creeks, Greenwood, Ar............................. .......... 16 Table 37-A Cost and Financial Statement .......................... 17 Table 37-B Authorizing Legislation....................... .. 21 Table 37-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............. 23 Table 37-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects.........24 Table 37-G Deauthorized Projects.....................................25 Table 37-H Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: N avigation................... ............................. 26 Table 37-I Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Lakes ........... ....................... ...... 29 Table 37-J Little River Basin, AR: Lakes .......................... 30 Table 37-K White River Basin; AR and MO: Lakes...........30 37-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Navigation 1. ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, AR, OK, AND KS Location. The headwaters for the Arkansas River are in the Rocky Mountains near Leadville, CO. The river flows southeastward 1,396 miles through Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Arkansas to join the Mississippi River 599 miles above Head of Passes, LA. Previous projects. For details see page 1066, Annual Report for 1932, and pages 744, 864, and 881, Annual Report for 1943. Existing project. The MKARNS provides navigation, hydroelectric power, flood control, water supply, sediment control, recreation, and fish and wildlife propagation improvements in the Arkansas River Basin. The MKARNS provides a navigation channel 9 feet deep and 444.8 miles long. The channel begins at the mouth of the White River, which enters the Mississippi River 599 miles above Head of Passes, LA, thence 9.8 miles upstream to the mouth of Wild Goose Bayou; thence 9.2 miles by a land cut, designated as Arkansas Post Canal to mile 42 (1943 survey) on the Arkansas River; thence 376.0 miles to the mouth of the Verdigris River at navigation mile 395.0; thence 49.8 miles up the Verdigris River to the head of navigation at Catoosa, OK. The waterway is canalized throughout its length by 17 locks and dams with a total lift of 420 feet. Dardanelle, Ozark-Jeta Taylor, Robert S. Kerr, and Webbers Falls are multiple purpose projects that include hydropower. Lock chambers are 110 by 600 feet. A minimum channel width of 150 feet is provided for the Verdigris River, 225 feet for San Bois Creek, 250 feet for the Arkansas River, and 300 feet for Arkansas Post Canal and White River Entrance Channel. Other coordinated developments consist of 15 lakes, of which 13 are in Tulsa District, in the states of Kansas and Oklahoma, and two are in the Little Rock District. Pertinent data and estimated Federal cost are summarized in Tables 37-H and 37-I, Navigation: Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS. Local cooperation. For MKARNS, local interests must provide adequate terminal and transfer facilities and bear the increased costs of maintenance and operation of all altered rail and highway routes, including bridges and appurtenances, utilities, and other existing improvements, other than federally owned. For lakes see requirements for each individual lake. Terminal facilities. Public port facilities are in operation at Pine Bluff (Jefferson County), Little Rock, and Fort Smith, AR, and Muskogee and Catoosa (Tulsa- Rogers County), OK. Port authorities have been organized to develop public facilities at North Little Rock, Dardanelle-Russellville, Morrilton, Clarksville, Ozark, and Van Buren, AR, and Sallisaw, OK. Terminal facilities are in operation or being built at 35 locations in Arkansas aid at 25 locations in Oklahoma along the improved waterways. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. (See Tables 37-H and 37-1 for navigation and lake listings.) For additional details of MKARNS and for the lakes in Oklahoma and Kansas, see the Tulsa District report. Flood damages prevented by Little Rock District projects in the Arkansas River Basin during FY 98 are estimated at $37,763,000; flood losses prevented through FY 98 are estimated at $747,998,600. Approximately 12.7 million tons of commerce were moved on the Arkansas portion of the MKARNS during calendar year 1998. Details of the MKARNS and lakes in Arkansas are shown on the following pages. Withdrawals for water supply purposes were the city of Plainview, AR, 226 acre-feet from Nimrod Lake. Condition at end of fiscal year. (See Tables 37-H and 37-1, Navigation: Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS, for status for individual items, navigation projects, lakes, and basin plan.) Work continues on the Arkansas River project in this District including construction of the Montgomery Point Lock & Dam, a meander cutoff levee between the Arkansas and White Rivers, and land acquisition studies. Installation of tow haulage equipment was completed at David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No. 6), Lock and Dam No. 5, Emmett Sanders Lock and Dam (No. 4), and Joe Hardin Lock and Dam (No. 3) in 1994, at Norrell Lock (Lock 1) and Lock No. 2 in 1997, and Murray Lock (No. 7) in 1998. Montgomery Point Lock and Dam: Montgomery Point Lock and Dam (MPLD) is being constructed one half mile upstream from the Mississippi River, on the White River Entrance Channel, the first reach in the MKARNS. Declining water surface elevations on the Mississippi River have been observed on the Mississippi river for a number of years, resulting in navigation restrictions on the White River. Construction of the MPLD would allow control of the water level in the entrance channel, which would maintain the reliability of the navigation system. 37-2 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT A construction contract for MPLD was awarded to the joint venture of J. A. Jones and Guy F. Atkinson Construction Companies on 21 July 1997 for $186M. A notice-to-proceed was issued on 26 August 1997 and the contractor began mobilization on 23 September 1997. The contractor suspended work operations on 13 January 1998 due to exhaustion of funds. Additional funds totaling $30M were reprogrammed in April and May 1998 to continue with construction activities. Cofferdam sheet pile driving operations were started on 23 June 1998 and should be completed about June 1999. Clearing and grubbing operations, diversion channel, and Phase 1 of the cofferdam are complete An electric utility service contract completed construction in January 1999 of a powerline to the project. The Corps has submitted an emergency rate request to the Arkansas Public Service Commission to set the utility rates. 2. ARTHUR V. ORMOND LOCK & DAM (NO.9), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Rockefeller Lake (pool 9) has four developed parks that in FY 98 experienced public visitation exceeding 1.1 million visitorhours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1965 and the lock and dam was placed in operation in July 1969. Construction of Holla Bend closure structure (fish and wildlife mitigation) began in July 1986 and was completed in September 1987. Construction of a non-Federal hydropower project, under the authority provided by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, was completed and placed into operation in August 1993 Construction of a widened downstream entrance was completed in 1998. 3. MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, BANK STABILIZATION & CHANNEL RECTIFICATION, AR Location. Several bank stabilization and channel rectification projects are laid out in various reaches extending from fixed point to fixed point on the Arkansas River from 33.7 to 362 miles above mouth and across the Arkansas-White cutoff, a 4- to 5-mile natural channel joining the Arkansas and White rivers about 18 and 12 miles above their respective mouths. Existing project. Bank stabilization and channel rectification is a part of the MKARNS. For a complete description of reach and location of each bank stabilization and channel rectification project, see the FY 81 Annual Report. Total Federal cost to date is $119,300,184 for the existing project in the Little Rock District. 4. DAVID D. TERRY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 6), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in January 1965 and the lock and dam project was placed in operation in August 1968. Tow haulage equipment was added in June 1993. Currently, the project has two developed parks which in FY 98 experienced public visitation exceeding 2.4 million visitorhours. 5. EMMETT SANDERS LOCK AND DAM, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Pool 4 has two developed parks, which in FY 98 experienced public visitation exceeding 1.2 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1964 and the lock and dam project was placed in operation in December 1968. Construction of a 40-foot wide, 9,600-foot long highway bridge crossing the lock and dam was completed in July 1995. The Corps of Engineers, as the Federal agency, has jurisdiction and custody of the dam (23 U.S.C. 320 [Public Law 2810]). The project was 100 percent funded by the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. Tow haulage equipment was placed into operation in June 1993. 6. JAMES W. TRIMBLE LOCK AND DAM (NO. 13), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. In FY 98, the project's three developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 1 million visitor-hours. 37-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in October 1965 and the lock and dam were placed in operation in April 1969. The bridge across the dam was completed in July 1968. Construction of a non- Federal hydropower facility at the project was completed in November 1988 under the authority provided by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 7. LOCK NO. 2 AND WILBUR D. MILLS (NO. 2), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Wilbur D. Mills has five developed parks, which in FY 98 experienced public visitation exceeding 4.1 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1963. The lock was placed in operation in March 1968. Emergency repairs to the scour protection features and tainter gates at the dam that resulted from a barge accident in December 1982 were completed in FY 85. The barges that clogged the dam gates during the December 1982 flood showed that, with a certain set of circumstances (higher than normal head combined with the clogged gates resulted in high current velocity that caused both upstream and downstream scouring), the structure could fail. This condition exists primarily because the structure was constructed on piling and designed for all of the gates to operate in unison. A model study by the Waterways Experiment Station determined the most feasible solution to this problem is to extend the stilling basin downstream. A contract to extend the stilling basin was awarded in June 1990 and completed in FY 1994. Project costs are estimated at $21.6 million. A contract was awarded in September 1995 to add tow haulage equipment at Lock No. 2. Construction of a non-Federal hydropower project, under the authority provided by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is on-going and scheduled to be placed into operation in August 1999. 8. JOE HARDIN LOCK AND DAM (NO. 3), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Pool 3 has three developed parks which in FY 98 experienced public visitation exceeding 0.4 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1963 and the lock and dam were placed in operation in December 1968. Tow haulage equipment was installed and operational in 1993. 9. LOCK AND DAM NO. 5, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operation and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Pool 5 has two developed parks which in FY 98 experienced public visitation exceeding 0.8 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in November 1964 and the lock and dam were placed in operation in December 1968. Tow haulage equipment was installed in June 1993. 10. MURRAY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 7), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Murray has five developed parks, which in FY 98 experienced public visitation exceeding 3.8 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in November 1964 and the lock and dam was placed in operation in October 1969. Construction of a non-Federal hydropower facility at the project was completed in May 1988 under the authority provided by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 11. NORRELL LOCK AND DAM (NO. 1) AND ENTRANCE CHANNEL, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Recommended modification. The White River Entrance Channel is the first reach in the MKARNS project. This is the only reach in the navigation system where the minimum stage is controlled by the stages of the Mississippi River and not by a downstream dam. Water surface elevations on the Mississippi River have been declining for years due to changed hydraulic conditions and riverbed elevations, resulting in inadequate navigation depths in the White River Entrance Channel. Construction of the Montgomery Point Lock and Dam would eliminate the navigation restrictions. The new lock and dam will include "bottom" operated gates 37-4 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT and a lock chamber of 600 feet by 110 feet with miter gates. The navigation pass over the dam (gates down) will be approximately 77 percent of the time for present conditions and 64 percent of the time for future conditions. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. The project currently has one developed park which in FY 98 experienced public visitation exceeding 0.80 million visitor- hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1963, and the lock and dam were placed in operation in June 1967. A contract to add tow haulage equipment to the lock was completed in 1997. 12. TOAD SUCK FERRY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 8), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. In FY 98, the project's five developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 1.4 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in July 1965 and the lock and dam was placed in operation in November 1969. The Conway water supply project was completed and transferred to the city for operation and maintenance in July 1983. 13. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR FLEET AND MARINE TERMINALS, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of Pine Bluff Marine Terminal began March 1968 and was placed in operation in April 1969. Construction of the Dardanelle Marine Terminal began June 1968 and it was placed in operation in November 1969. 14. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 37-C for other authorized navigation projects.) 15. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Preauthorization studies under the small project continuing authorities program, navigation activities, Section 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended. Expenditures for Sec. 107 activities in FY 98 totaled $32,218.62. Coordination account, $3,076.19; Russellville Slack Water Harbor, Arkansas River, Russellville, Arkansas; $29,142.43 Flood Control 16. BLACK RIVER, POPLAR BLUFF, MO Location. The project is located along the Black River, in Poplar Bluff, MO, about 160 miles south of St. Louis, MO. Existing project. A Detailed Project Report and Environmental Assessment, dated November 1995, recommended a 1,300-foot long, 3-foot high, reinforced concrete floodwall and a stoplog structure. The estimated cost is $544,400. Construction is authorized under the Continuing Authorities Program, Section 205, Flood control Act of 1948, as amended. Local cooperation. The project cooperation agreement was signed December 2, 1996. Operations and results during fiscal year. The construction contract was awarded on November 7, 1997, and construction was completed on July 6, 1998. Will be turned over to the sponsor in FY 99. Condition at end of fiscal year. In the process of issuing a purchase order to repair a bank slide near the floodwall. 17. BLUE MOUNTAIN LAKE, AR Location. (See Table 37-1: Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, and KS: Lakes.) Existing project. Construction cost was approximately $5.1 million. For further information see pages 906 and 907 of the 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. Flood damages prevented during FY 98 are estimated at $714,900; cumulative benefits through September 30, 1998, are estimated at $26,728,600. The project's five 37-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding $11,467,910. Construction was complete in September 1.3 million visitor-hours. 1989. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for additional recreational sanitary facilities. Construction of the project began in May 1940 and it was placed in operation in March 1947. 18. CATO SPRINGS BRANCH AND TOWN BRANCH, FAYETTEVILLE, AR Location. This project is located on the south side of Fayetteville, in Washington County (Northwestern Arkansas). Existing project. Plans consist of clearing and grubbing along Cato Springs Branch and Town Branch and removing a horseshoe shaped bend along Cato Springs Branch by excavating 300 feet of new channel. Construction is authorized under the Continuing Authorities Program, Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Local cooperation. The city of Fayetteville signed a local cooperation agreement on Aug.9, 1994. The total project cost is $267,100 with the Federal share amounting to $145,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project was physically completed in July 1996 and turned over to the local sponsor. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was closed out on December 5, 1996. 19. CLEARWATER LAKE, MO Location. (See Table 37-K: White River Basin, AR & MO: Lakes.) Existing project. Construction cost, including the cost of modifying the project, is estimated at $22.4 million. For further information see pages 897 and 898 of 1962 Annual Report. Major rehabilitation. Construction began in November 1987 on a seepage berm on the upstream face of the dam, a grout curtain on the right abutment, and a parapet wall along the dam. An additional 9 acres of land was acquired to widen the spillway from 190 feet to 370 feet. The widened spillway will pass about 90 percent of the probable maximum flood with water surface at the top of existing dam and parapet wall, preventing waves from overtopping the dam. The cost of the modification was Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Flood damages prevented during FY 98 are estimated at $22,451,200; cumulative benefits through September 1998 are estimated at $170,181,500. Project currently has 6 developed parks, which in FY 98 experienced public visitation exceeding 5 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for improvements to the sanitary facilities in the recreation areas. Construction of the project began in June 1940 and was ready for beneficial use in March 1948. A new water control plan is being considered that better meets the needs of the interests in the basin. Current schedules call for the proposed plan to be adopted in December 1999, after completion of an environmental assessment and public meetings. 20. DEQUEEN LAKE, AR Location. On Rolling Fork River, RM 22.8, a tributary of the Little River, in Sevier County, about 4 miles northwest of DeQueen, AR. Existing project. An earth-fill dam, 2,360 feet long, constructed to 160 feet above streambed. An uncontrolled spillway, 200 feet wide, is about 1,400 feet east of main embankment. Outlet works consist of a gated conduit, 12 feet in diameter. The lake controls 169 square miles of drainage area and provides a total storage of 136,100 acre-feet (101,200 acre-feet for flood control storage, 25,500 acre-feet for conservation storage, and 9,400 acre-feet for sedimentation reserve). Federal cost of the project is estimated at $19,623,752. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Section 301, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Flood damages prevented during FY 98 are estimated at $174,800; cumulative benefits through September, 1998, are estimated at $7,982,100. In FY 98, the project's six developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 1.1 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began April 1966. Project was placed in useful operation in August 1977. 37-6 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT 21. DIERKS LAKE, AR Location. On Saline River, RM 56.6, a tributary of the Little River, about 5 miles northwest of Dierks, Howard County, AR. Existing project. An earth-fill dam, 2,760 feet long, and about 153 feet above the streambed. An uncontrolled spillway 800 feet wide is in a saddle at the west end of the dam. Outlet works consisting of a gated 6- by 9-foot oblong conduit, one 24 -inch low-flow pipe, and one 30-inch water supply pipe are provided. The lake controls a drainage area of 114 square miles and provides for storage of 67,100 acre-feet for flood control and 29,700 acre-feet for water supply, conservation, and sedimentation reserve, a total of 96,800 acre-feet. The Federal cost of the project was $16,002,903. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 98 are estimated at $37,800; cumulative benefits through September 1998, are estimated at $5,123,100. Currently have three developed parks, which in FY 98 experienced 1 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1968. In May 1975, the embankment closure was completed and the project was placed in useful operation. 22. DRY JORDAN CREEK, HARRISON, AR Location. Dry Jordan Creek is within the city limits of Harrison, Boone County, AR. Existing project. The Definite Project Report (DPR) recommended clearing and grubbing with some bank stabilization on 2.5 miles of Dry Jordan Creek, under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. The estimated cost is $1.3 million and the Federal share is $845,000. Local cooperation. The city of Harrison, the local co-sponsor and the Federal government cost-shared the feasibility study. The city has signed a letter of intent to cost share construction of the project, according to Section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act, 1986 (P.L. 99-662). Operations and results during the fiscal year. This project was terminated in December 1998 due to lack of sponsor participation. 23. FOURCHE BAYOU BASIN, LITTLE ROCK, AR Location. On Fourche, Rock and Grassy Flat Creeks in the vicinity of Little Rock, Pulaski County, AR. Existing project. The project, authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL99-662), consists of widening, clearing and snagging with alteration of highway and railroad bridges. This work was physically completed February 1996. Authorization also included the acquisition of 1,750 acres of bottomlands and nature appreciation areas. The ASA(CW) declined to include the bottomland acquisition when the project was authorized. In 1996, that decision was reversed. A General Reevaluation Report (GRR) will have to be prepared to authorize a modification to the Local Cooperation Agreement to include the bottomland acquisition. The estimated project cost is $34 million: Federal, $22.3 million; non-Federal, $11.7mitlion. Local cooperation. The city of Little Rock, the project sponsor, signed the local cooperation agreement in August 1987. Operations and results during the fiscal year. The operation and maintenance manual was completed in Feburary 98. An environmental baseline study was completed in FY 98 to delineate between potential HTRW sites and clean areas within the bottomlands prior to any acquisitions. A GRR was not initiated pending the city of Little Rock 's decision to proceed with the acquisition of the 1,750 acres of Fourche bottomlands and nature appreciation areas. 24. GILLHAM LAKE, AR Location. Damsite is on the Cossatot River, RM 49.0, in Howard County, about 5 miles northeast of Gillham in Sevier County, AR. Existing project. Federal cost of the project was $17,827,111. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Section 301, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Tri-Lakes Water District furnished a resolution of intent to repay costs allocated to water supply storage. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 98 are estimated at $205,300; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $10,964,900. In FY 98, the project's four developed 37-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 parks experienced public visitation exceeding 0.8 million visitor-hours that resulted in $57,775 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1968. The embankment closure was completed in May 1975, and the project was placed in useful operation. 25. LITTLE RIVER BASIN, AR Location. Improvements are on the Little River and tributaries in Arkansas. More definite location of individual items is shown in Table 37-J. Existing project. A six-lake system for flood control and other purposes in the Little River Basin. The system consists of four lakes in Arkansas: Millwood on the main stem, Dierks on the Saline River, DeQueen on the Rolling Fork River, and Gillham on the Cossatot River; and two lakes in Oklahoma: Broken Bow on the Mountain Fork River and Pine Creek on the Little River. Under a District boundary change, effective in October 1980, the four projects in this system in Arkansas were reassigned from the Tulsa District to the Little Rock District. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Section 301, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Tri-Lakes Water District (DeQueen, Gillham, and Dierks) furnished a resolution of intent to repay costs allocated to water supply storage. The Southwest Arkansas Water District is currently repaying costs allocated to water supply storage at Millwood Lake. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of projects continued. See individual projects for details. Flood damages prevented by the Little River Basin reservoirs during FY 98 are estimated at $561,800; cumulative benefits through September, 1998, are estimated at $36,192,200. Withdrawals for water supply purposes were: The; Tri-Lakes Water District, AR, 1,319 acre-feet from Gillham Lake; Tri-Lakes Water District, AR, 352 acrefeet from Dierks Lake, and Southwest Arkansas Water District, AR, 72,027 acre-feet from Millwood Lake. Condition at end of fiscal year. Millwood, De- Queen, Gillham, and Dierks Lakes are complete and in operation. 26. MILL CREEK, FORT SMITH, AR Location. In southwest Fort Smith, Sebastian County, AR. Existing project. The project was constructed under Section 205 of the Continuing Authority Program. The project included improvements on 3.9 miles of the Mill Creek channel and modifications on three bridges. Project construction was completed in November 1992. The estimated project cost is $8,959,300: $4,843,000, Federal and $4,116,300, non-Federal. Local cooperation. The city of Fort Smith, the local sponsor, signed the local cooperation agreement in November 1988.The city assumed project operation and maintenance on 17 June 1993. Conditions at end of fiscal year. A refund of $281,390.96 was made to the city of Fort Smith in FY98. Financial completion is pending, as it requires a correction in the financial management system. 27. MILLWOOD LAKE, AR Location. On the Little River, RM 16.0, approximately 7 miles east of Ashdown, Little River County, AR, and about 2 miles northeast of Millwood, Little River County, AR. Existing project. The Federal cost of the project was $46,087,382. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Flood damages prevented during FY 98 are estimated at $143,900; cumulative benefits through September, 1998, are estimated at $12,122,100. Millwood Lake has 12 developed parks which in FY 98 experienced public visitation exceeding 3.6 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in September 1961 and the project was placed in full flood control operation in August 1966. 28. NIMROD LAKE, AR Location. Existing project. Estimated cost is $4,092,825. For further information see pages 908 and 909 of 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the 1938 Flood Control Act applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. Addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities continued. In FY 98, seven parks experienced pub- 37-8 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT lic visitation exceeding 1.6 million visitor-hours. During FY 98, flood damages prevented are estimated at $483,100; cumulative benefits through September, 1998, are estimated at $18,457,500. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. 29. WHITE RIVER BASIN (LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT), AR & MO Location. Improvements are on the White River and tributaries, Arkansas and Missouri. More definite location of individual items is shown in Table 37-K: White River Basin. Existing project. A general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the White River Basin. The plan includes seven lakes; two are flood control only projects and five are multiple-purpose projects. Beaver, Table Rock, Bull Shoals, Norfork, Clearwater, Greers Ferry and Bell Foley lakes were selected and approved for construction by the Chief of Engineers, and individual reports on six of these seven lakes are presented on subsequent pages. The Bell Foley project, the remaining unbuilt authorized project, was reevaluated in FY 89; the project continues to have a favorable benefit-to-cost ratio since its formulation in 1968. The lakes in the plan are listed in Table 37-K: White River Basin. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, applies to Beaver, Greers Ferry, and Norfork projects. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of projects continued. Flood damages prevented by the White River Basin lakes during FY 98 are estimated at $31,640,600; cumulative benefits through September, 1998, are estimated at $522,093,000. Flood damages prevented by the White River Basin levees during FY98 are estimated at $2,407,400; cumulative benefits through September 1998, are estimated at $84,229,100. Electric energy delivered to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing during FY 98 totaled 2.6 billion kilowatt-hours. Water releases for fish hatcheries were: 28,960 acrefeet from Norfork Lake for Fish and Wildlife Service trout hatchery; 14,480 acre-feet from Table Rock Lake for Missouri Conservation Commission trout hatchery; and, 14,480 acre-feet from Greers Ferry Lake for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service trout hatchery. Withdrawals for water supply purposes were: Beaver Water District, AR, 41,782 acre-feet, and Carroll-Boone Water District, AR, 7,882 acre-feet, from Beaver Lake; Madison County Water District, AR, 2,585 acre-feet, and Benton-Washington Counties Water District, AR, 50 ac-ft, from Beaver Lake; Kings River Country Club, 34 ac-ft, from Table Rock Lake; Marion County Regional Water District, AR, 914 acre-feet from Bull Shoals Lake; Water and Sewer Improvement District No.3 of Mountain Home, AR, 3,859 acre-feet from Norfork Lake; and the city of Clinton, AR, 2,103 acrefeet; Community Water System, Inc., AR, 4,272 acrefeet; Red Apple Inn, AR, 72 ac-ft; and, Thunderbird Country Club, AR, 23 ac-ft, from Greers Ferry Lake. Condition at end of fiscal year. Beaver, Table Rock, Bull Shoals, Norfork, Clearwater, and Greers Ferry lakes are complete and in operation. Progress on these lakes is shown in individual reports. Bell Foley lake project is in a deferred status. Water Valley and Lone Rock lakes have been deauthorized. A new water control plan was approved and implemented in December 1997. This plan was developed in close coordination with the basins various interests and was recommended as their preferred plan of operation. 30. WHITE RIVER, BATESVILLE, AR Location. On the White River, within the city of Batesville, Independence County, AR. Existing project. The Definite Project Report (DPR), recommending construction of a levee and floodwall to protect the industrial area, under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, was approved in June 1988. The project includes 4,855 feet of levee/floodwall, 9 stoplog structures, 6 drainage structures, a stoplog storage area, 3 sewerline control gates, and a two-gage automated warning system. Estimated cost is $3.4 million. The federal share is $2.55million. The levee/ floodwall construction contract was awarded in July 1995 and completed in Dec 1996.The levee/floodwall was transferred to the city of Batesville for operation and maintenance March 14, 1997. Local cooperation. The city of Batesville signed a local cooperation agreement in January 1994 with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The city's share is estimated to be $850,000. Operations and results during the fiscal year. The stoplog storage area contract was completed in December 1997and plans and specifications were prepared for the sewerline control gates. The levee contractor filed an appeal to the Engineer Board of Appeals for claims totaling $147,140.84. 37-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 31. WHITE RIVER, JACKSONPORT, AR Location. On the left bank, of the White River at RM 256 between Newport and Jacksonport, Jackson County, AR. Existing project. 300 feet of revetment was added to the existing revetment which protected the Massey- Alexander Levee (formerly known as Jackson County Levee District No. 2) under authority of Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. The project cost was estimated at $123.600 with a Federal share of $92.700. The construction started August 1996 and was completed December 1996. Local cooperation. The Massey-Alexander Levee District signed a Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) in September 1995. An additional 535 feet of revetment was added, as a betterment, to protect a natural gas pipeline at the local sponsor's expense of $206,000. The sponsor assumed operation of the project in November 1997. Operations and results during the fiscal year. The financial closeout was completed February 1998. 32. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Approved regulations for operation and maintenance of flood control works, Part 208 of Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, provide for periodic inspection of completed projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Inspections of local flood protection projects were made to determine extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation of these projects. Responsible officials of improvement districts concerned were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation of local flood protection works under their jurisdiction where appropriate. Costs for FY 98 were $103,163.25. Total accumulative cost through September, 1998, was $2,018,697.25. 33. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Fourche Bayou Basin, Little Rock, AR, FY 1998 costs, $101,933.87; Arkansas River, Tucker Creek, AR, FY 1998 costs, $1,185.18. (See Table 37-E: Other Authorized Flood Control Projects.) 34. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (1) Emergency bank protection, Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act. FY 1998 costs, $94,393.42: Section 14, Coordination Account, $2,234.63; Batesville Water Tower, AR, $45,746.00 ; and Little Rock Port, Section 14, $63.47; Beaver Creek at Slough Hollow, MO, $28,279.07; Arkansas River at Riverfront Park, North Little Rock, AR, $630,851.45 of which $10,305.56 was for Planning and Design Analysis, $421,468.16 for the Federal share of construction cost, and $199,077.73 for the non-Federal share of construction; and Frog Bayou; Crawford County, AR $7,764.69. (2) Snagging and clearing, Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act. Fiscal year costs: None. (3) Flood control activities, Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act. FY 1998 costs, $746,622.50: Section 205 Coordination Account, $2,640.59; Black River, Poplar Bluff, Mo., $305,248.32; Cato Springs Branch, Fayetteville, AR, $201.46; Cornstalk Branch, Judsonia, AR, $62,207.72; Dry Jordan Creek, AR, $9.70; Grassy Flat Creek, Little Rock, AR, ,$14,266.22; Hester, Heartsill, and Adamson Creeks, AR, $32,375.90; Mill Creek, AR, $287,836.09; White River, Batesville, AR, $33,231.99; White River, Jacksonport, AR, $1,317.63; Recon Report, Harrison, AR, $77.64; Flat Creek, Cassville, MO, $7,127.79; and Brodie Creek, Little Rock, AR, $81.45. Emergency Response Activities (1) Public Law 84-99 (Flood Control and Coastal Emergency): None Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 35. BEAVER LAKE, AR Location. (See Table 37-K: White River Basin.) Existing project. Estimated cost is $50,797,000. For further information see 788 and 789 of 1966 Annual Report. (For authorization see Table 37-B.) Major rehabilitation. Since the dam was constructed there has been a seepage problem below Dike No. 1. Based on detailed investigation, it was determined that the limestone foundation under Dike 1 and 200 feet of the north end of the main dam embankment is the main problem. The plan of improvement was a concrete seepage cutoff in Dike 1 and the north end of the main dam. A $16.9-million contract to construct a concrete cutoff wall was awarded in June 1989; the no- 37-10 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT tice to proceed was issued in October 1989. The contract period was estimated to be 760 days. However, the contractor ceased productive work due to inability to excavate rock and was been placed in default. An $18.8 reprocurement contract was awarded in April 1992. Work began in May 1992 and all work was completed in Nov 1995. Project cost is estimated at $26,588,000 million. The Beaver Dam Safety Assurance study was completed with FY 97 expenditures of $1,359.61. Water Quality Enhancement. Congress directed the Corps to implement best management practices (BMP's) in the Beaver Lake watershed and monitor the effects of these practices on water quality. A study was completed and a project report was approved in July 1989. The BMP's and water quality monitoring were concurrently implemented over a 5-year period which began in May 1991 with a project completion date of July 1997. The BMP's were implemented under the terms of a memorandum of agreement between the Corps and the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), formerly the Soil Conservation Service, with the assistance of the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service. The water quality monitoring was implemented under terms of a local cost-sharing agreement with the Arkansas Soil and Water Conservation Commission. Water quality monitoring was performed in consultation with the Environmental Protection Agency by a Corps administered contract. The water qualitymonitoring contract was awarded on January 29, 1992. Water quality sampling began in May 1992 and was completed on July 1, 1996. BMP implementation was completed August 31,1995. Cost in FY 98 was $67,897.93 Federal, and $1,434.58 non-Federal. Total project cost was $6,878,775.15 Environmental Infrastructure Assistance. The Water Resources Development Act of 1992 authorized the Corps of Engineers to provide design and construction assistance to appropriate non-Federal interests for a water transmission line from the northern part of Beaver Lake, Arkansas, into Benton and Washington Counties. This project is part of a $40 million project, which includes a water intake, treatment and storage facilities, and transmission lines. The project sponsor is the Benton/Washington County Water Association, and the primary source of funding is the Rural Economic and Community Development Service (formerly the Farmers Home Administration, U.S. Department of Agriculture). The Little Rock District and the project sponsor executed a Memorandum of Agreement in June 1997. The Little Rock District then transferred $3 million to the sponsor for construction of a segment of the water transmission line. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the 1938 Flood Control Act, and the 1958 Water Supply Act, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 98 are estimated at $1,360,300; cumulative benefits are estimated at $37,143,100. During the year, 158,894,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. The project has eleven developed parks, which in FY 98 experienced public visitation exceeding 19.8 million visitor-hours that resulted in $630,887 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Alterations to existing parks to enhance fee collections, improve efficiency, and reduce the maintenance effort or rehabilitate the 26-year old park operation through operation and maintenance and SRUF funds, as appropriate. Construction of the project began in October 1959 and was placed in operation for flood control in December 1963, hydroelectric power generation with both units in May 1965, and water supply in January 1966. Work on a dam seepage problem is complete. 36. BULL SHOALS LAKE, AR Location. (See table 37-K: White River Basin, AR & MO.) Existing project. Cost with eight generating units was $88,858,711. For further information see pages 725 and 726 of 1965 Annual Report. (For authorization see table 37-B.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 98 are estimated at $3,200,000; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $144,871,500. During the year, more than 846,878,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. The project has eighteen developed parks, which in FY 98 experienced public visitation exceeding 27.1 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Alterations to existing parks are needed to en- 37-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 hance fee collections, to improve efficiency, to reduce maintenance effort or to rehabilitate the 37-year-old park facilities through operations and maintenance or SRUF funds, as appropriate. Low dissolved oxygen readings in the downstream area of Bull Shoals Dam in October 1990 have resulted in ongoing studies to be undertaken to minimize harmful effects on the trout fishing of the White River. Unguaranteed short-term solutions to the problem, consisting of limiting generation, will sustain the existing fishery, but long-term guaranteed changes will require congressional authorization. Construction of the project began in April 1946 and was ready for beneficial flood control use in June 1951 and generation of electrical energy in September 1952. Units 1 through 8 were placed in operation September 1952, December 1952, June 1953, January 1962, February 1962, August 1963, and September 1963, respectively. Major rehabilitation (Powerhouse). A major rehabilitation study was initiated in October 1995. The study was to investigate a solution to the environmentally induced reliability problem (low dissolved oxygen) of these units. Potential solutions include new autoventing turbines, a down stream weir, turbine venting, or forced-air. Following preliminary study results, the turbines were modified in 1997 to increase downstream aeration. The study has been suspended while the effects of these modifications are evaluated. 37. DARDANELLE LOCK AND DAM (NO. 10), AR Location. (See Table 37-H: Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Navigation.) Existing project. Project is a unit of MKARNS. Dam is 2,683 feet long and 68 feet high. It has a spillway with 20 tainter gates 50 feet long and 39 feet high. Navigation lock is 110 by 600 feet with a lift of 54 feet. Powerhouse originally contained four 31,000-kilowatt generators. Lake has a storage capacity of 486,200 acre-feet. Estimated cost was $84,270,124. Local cooperation. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Pool fluctuated within 2-ft. power pondage, elevation 336.0 to 338.0. Power generation continued. During FY 98, about 499,666,100 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. In FY 98, the project's thirteen developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 7.6 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction began June 1957. Power units were placed on line in April, May, and September 1965, and January 1966. The lock became operable in December 1969. The Visitors Center and resident office were completed in May 1985. Major rehabilitation. Work is underway to replace the existing four units with new "state-of-the-art" equipment which will increase the plant output by approximately 13 percent. Unit No. 1 was completed and returned to service in February 1998. Unit 3 was completed and returned to service in November 1998. The contract end date is July 2000. Estimated cost of the powerhouse major rehabilitation is $29,700,000. 38. GREERS FERRY LAKE, AR Location. (See Table 37-K: White River, AR & MO. ) Existing project. Estimated cost is $55,125,000. For further information see page 740 of 1964 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Section 2, 1938 Flood Control Act and 1988 Water Supply Act, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 98 are estimated at $334,400; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $28,278,700. In FY 98, 156,328,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. The project has seventeen developed parks, which in FY 98 experienced public visitation exceeding 38.9 million visitor-hours. The project's operational management plan provides means by which the natural resources, including water quality, aesthetic value, forestry, fish and wildlife are managed and protected for future generations. An allvolunteer environmental program (annual cleanup) has been most successful and serves as a model for the Nation. During the past 27 years the program has won more than 26 national awards. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of the project began in June 1957 and was ready for beneficial flood control use in January 1962. Power units 1 and 2 were operable in March and May 1964, and water supply was operable in April 1971. The Visitors Center was completed in June 1983 at a cost of $813,000. Water Supply. Two water supply reallocation studies were underway in FY 98. A reallocation study was completed for the Thunderbird Country Club with a 37-12 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT water supply agreement for 54.89acre-feet executed in March 1998.Silver Ridge Development, Incorporated requested the use of Greers Ferry Lake storage to water their golf course. Execution of the agreement was pending resolution of hydropower concerns. A reallocation study for 3,522 acre-feet of storage for the use of Heber Springs, Arkansas was began in FY 98. Completion of the reallocation study and approval of the draft water supply agreement was pending resolution of hydropower issues. 39. NORFORK LAKE, AR Location. (See Table 37-K: White River Basin, AR & MO.) Existing project. The total estimated cost is $70,701,629, including highway bridge construction. This does not include an estimate for the addition of power units 3 and 4, which were authorized, but never built. For further information see page 896 of 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 98 are estimated at $965,300; total cumulative flood damages prevented through September 1998, are estimated at $47,842,000. During the year, more than 182,795,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy was delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. The project's 18 developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 16 million visitor-hours during FY 98. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition of power units 3 and 4. Construction of project began in October 1940, ready for beneficial flood control use in June 1943, and for generation of electrical energy with one unit in June 1944. Second unit was added in February 1950. Water supply was added as a purpose in December 1969. Construction of two highway bridges over Norfork Lake to replace ferries was completed in November 1982. The bridges were transferred to the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department for operation and maintenance in July 1984. 40. OZARK-JETA TAYLOR LOCK AND DAM (NO. 12), AR Location. (See Table 37-H: Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, and KS: Navigation.) Existing project. Project is a unit of MKARNS. The dam is 2,480 feet long and 58 feet above streambed; spillway has 15 tainter gates, each 50 feet long and 46 feet high. Navigation lock is 110 by 600 feet with a lift of 34 feet. Powerhouse contains five 20,000 kilowatt generators. Lake has a storage capacity of 148,400 acre-feet. In addition, one foot of power pondage is provided in Pool 13 between elevations 391.0 and 392.0. Cost was $85,629,412. (For authorization see table 37-B.) Local cooperation. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Delivered 330,538,500 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Ozark Lake has 10 developed parks which in FY 98 experienced public visitation exceeding 1.8-million visitor- hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in December 1964. Project is complete. Lock and dam was placed in operation in November 1969. Power units were placed on line as follows: unit 1, November 1972; unit 2, August 1973; unit 3, October 1973; unit 4, December 1973; and unit 5, May 1974. A major rehabilitation study was initiated in October 1996. The powerplant has experienced numerous mechanical problems and major repair requirements since its construction. The study describes the condition of the powerplant and reviews alternative solutions. The Rehabilitation Study Report was submitted in March 1999 for funding. 41. TABLE ROCK LAKE, MO Location. (See Table 37-K: White River Basin, AR & MO.) Existing project. Cost was $119,491.90. For further information see page 893 of 1962 Annual Report. (For authorization see table 37-B.) Dam Safety (Assurance). Table Rock Dam has a hydrologic deficiency. The Probable Maximum Flood (PMF) would overtop the dam more than 5 feet and would breach the earthen embankment portion of the dam, causing catastrophic flood conditions. An auxiliary gated spillway to safely pass the PMF will be constructed using two major contracts . Design on the project is ongoing and the first construction contract is scheduled for award in March 1999. The second contract is scheduled to be awarded in 2000. The total estimated project cost is $60.2 million. 37-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Local cooperation. Section 2 of the 1938 Flood Control Act applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 98 are estimated at $3,329,400; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $93,776,200. During the year, about 580,636,000 kilowatt- hours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. The District and the Waterways Experiment Station are investigating the possibilities of improving the quality of Table Rock releases with a hypolimnetic oxygenation system. Table Rock Lake has fifteen developed parks which in FY 98 experienced public visitation exceeding 17.1 million visitor-hours. This project's operational management plan provides means by which the natural resources, including forestry, fish and wildlife, are managed and protected for future generations. Table Rock Dam Safety Assurance Report, which considered a new additional auxiliary gated spillway, was approved in June 1995. Plans and specifications are scheduled for completion by Dec 1998. Estimated project cost is $50 million. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreational sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in October 1954. The project was ready for beneficial flood control use in November 1958, and for generation of electrical energy with units 1 and 2 in May 1959. Units 3 and 4 were added in April and June 1961. General Investigations 42. SURVEYS Expenditures for surveys in FY 98 totaled $156,940.90. Flood damage prevention studies; May Branch, Ft. Smith, AR, FY 98 expenditures were $73,909.11. The project study plan was drafted in FY 98. The city of Forth Smith, AR, the sponsor, approved the signing of the Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement (FCSA), 16 June 1998 (the .FCSA was signed 13 November 1998). The feasibility study cost is estimated to be $1.4 million and take 3 years to complete. Miscellaneous activities. Special investigations, $28,341.95; Review of FERC Licenses, $2,799.96; Interagency Water Resource Development, $14,118.84; North American Waterfowl Management Plan, $3,675.69. Coordination with Other Agencies and Non-Fed. Cooperation w/other Water Agencies, $3,111.77; Planning Assistance to States (PAS), Atalanta Dam Break, $36.08; and PAS Negotiation Funds, $2,885.37; Black and Arkansas Rivers, AR $14,348.20; and Willow Spring, MO, Flood Hazard Study, $28,146.63. 43. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING & DESIGN (PED). Total PED expenditures in FY 98 were $73,672.12. Arkansas River, Tucker Creek, $33,030.49. Plans and specifications were completed during FY 98 and the Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on 10 August 1998. The City of Conway was the sponsor and provided real estate for the project. The construction contract was awarded on 2 September 1998. The bid award was for $293,209. The project would raise low portions of the existing Faulkner County Levee No. 1 to provide 100-year Arkansas River flood protection for the city of Conway, Faulkner County, Arkansas, in the vicinity of Tucker Creek and Tupelo Bayou. Arkansas River Levees, AR, $38,132.33. Congress added funds in FY 1996 to continue preconstruction, engineering and design (PED). The plans and specifications for repairing the Plum Bayou system (Plum Bayou, Baucum and Old River Lake levees) were completed in FY 1997; the proposed repairs for this system include culvert replacements and slide repairs, and the estimated cost is $2.1 million. Additional funding was not received in FY 98. 44. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA. Flood Plain Management Services (FPMS). Expenditures for FPMS activities in FY 98 totaled $463,236.90. National Flood Proofing Committee, $55,780.00; Flood Plain Management Services, $133,853.82; Technical Services, $92,969.76; Quick Responses, $10,042.79; SS - Camp Robinson, AR, $35.26; Eastgate, Ottawa County, OK, $14.31; SS - Cache Creek, AR, $28.62; Farmington, AR, 10.05; SSChoctawhatchee Riv., FL,. $240.04; Black Cr., Forrest Co., MS., $144.08; SS - Pine Bluff Nature Center, $10,000; SS - Elkins, AR FW, $29,585.89; Lowell, AR, $24.03; and Bull Creek, MO, $24.51; SS - Fayetteville, AR, $130,483.74. The authority for the Flood Plain Management Services program is Section 206 of the 1960 Flood Control Act, PL 86-645, as amended. Under the authority of Section 321 of the Water Resources Devel- 37-14 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT opment Act of 1990, PL 101-640, technical services and planning assistance are (1) provided to states and local governments without charge and (2) offered to Federal agencies and private persons on a cost recovery basis. Through these technical services and planning guidance, the program encourages comprehensive flood plain management planning at all levels to reduce the potential for losses to life and property from floods. Federal and non-Federal agencies and the private sector are assisted with planning and development information for flood hazard areas. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain regulations, Federal Insurance Program requirements, and Executive Order 11988 guidelines. Such assistance may include factual flood information (available or determined) and interpretation of flood frequencies, extent of flooding, flood-water velocity, duration of flooding and floodway limits. Hydrologic Data Collection. During FY 98, 117 stations were operated; 81 cooperatively with USGS and 36 by the Corps. The total cost for streamflow and some sediment data from all sources of funding was $785,870, of which $642,550 was transferred to USGS. The District also participated in a cooperative program with the National Weather Service for rainfall and/or river reporting stations for use in forecasting streamflow for flood warning and operation of lake projects. Records were also collected at certain hydroclimate rainfall stations under a cooperative program between the two agencies. For these services, $53,886 was transferred to the National Weather Service. Environmental Restoration (Section 1135). Total FY 1998 expenditures were $41,771.35, including the Coordination Account, $2,061.92; Initial Appraisals, $28,946.03; Morgan Point Bendway Closure, $9,194.22; and the Nimrod Waterfowl Levee, $1,569.18. 45. NIMROD WATERFOWL LEVEE Location. Nimrod Lake is located on the Fourche La Fave River at RM 62.6. The project area consists of a 2,400-acre green tree reservoir located within the flood control pool of the lake. Existing project. The proposed modification consists of constructing a new 7-foot by 7-foot by 13.6-foot gate well structure including a 36-inch canal gate with a hand wheel and 68 feet of 36-inch reinforced concrete pipe on the existing levee. Construction is authorized under the Continuing Authority Program, Section 1135(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended: Environmental Restoration. Local cooperation. Arkansas Game and Fish Commission signed the PCA on June 26, 1997, and they have provided their cash contribution. Operations and results during the fiscal year. The construction contract was awarded August 15, 1997, and construction was completed July 17, 1998. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was transferred to the local sponsor, financially closed out, and a completion report was prepared in July 1998. 46. NIMROD FISHERIES RESTORATION Location. Nimrod Lake is located about 9 miles southeast of Plainview, Arkansas, in Yell County, on the Fourche LaFave River at river mile 62.6. Existing Project. The proposed modification consists of re-vegating the shoreline, adding fish shelters, and manipulating the water level management plan. Local Cooperation. The Arkansas Game and Fish Commission is the local sponsor and strongly supports this project. Results during the fiscal year. Work begin on the PRP in May 1998. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work was being completed on the PRP. 47. MORGAN POINT BENDWAY CLOSURE STRUCTURE, DESHA COUNTY, AR Location. This project is located immediately downstream of the non-overflow embankment of the Wilbur D. Mills Dam of the MKARNS, in Desha County (Southeastern Arkansas). Existing project. The project modification report was approved in September 1995 under Section 1135(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended: Environmental Restoration. The report recommended construction of a closure structure at the downstream end of the bendway, placement of a water intake structure, cypress tree plantings and placement of fish shelters. The project is intended to restore about 7 miles of riverine and wetland habitat damaged by the construction and operation of the Wilbur D. Mills Dam. Local cooperation. The state of Arkansas is the sponsor with a cost share of 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal. 37-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Operations and results during fiscal year. The PCA was executed in May 1997, and land acquisition was d completed in August 1998. Bids were opened 15 September 1998. 48. ARKANSAS RIVER, LITTLE ROCK PORT, AR The Little Rock Port Authority requested the assistance of the Corps of Engineers during FY 97 to study riverbank erosion, under authority of Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, at their facilities. Funds were received and the problem was investigated. It was determined that there was not a Federal interest in solving problems at the Little Rock Port Authority facilities. Six thousand dollars were expended during this investigation. 49. FROG BAYOU, CRAWFORD COUNTY, AR The Crawford County Judge requested the assistance of the Corps of Engineers during FY 98 to study streambank erosion, under authority of Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, at their facilities. Funds were received and the investigation began. Work in the amount of $7,800 was performed during FY 98. 50. CORNSTALK BRANCH, JUDSONIA, AR The Mayor of Judsonia requested the assistance of the Corps of Engineers to study flooding problems within the southwest section of the town under the authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. Funds were received in FY 97 and FY 98. Studies found there were insufficient flood damage reduction benefits to support a Federal project. Seventy thousand dollars were expended during this study. 51. HESTER, HEARTSILL AND ADAMSON CREEKS, GREENWOOD, AR The Mayor of Greenwood requested the assistance of the Corps of Engineers to study flooding along Hester, Heartsill and Adamson Creeks under authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. The finding of the study was that there were insufficient flood reduction benefits to support a Federal project. Thirty-five thousand dollars were expended studying Greenwood's flooding problem. 37-16 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT Table 37-A Cost And Financial Statement See Total Section Cost to in Text Project Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 Sept. 30, 1998 1.-15. McClellan-Kerr New Work Arkansas River Approp. 5,886,000 7,000,000 1,646,147 2,128,000 494,726,619 Navigation Cost 8,676,261 6,083,171 3,207,682 2,059,266 504,660,538 Locks & Dams, Maint. AR Approp. 20,127,906 20,238,375 18,863,000 18,562,277 440,498,652 2 Cost 21,011,143 19,958,273 17,216,514 21,055,570 439,811,237 2 New Work Contrib. 262,574 - - - 5,723,348 Cost 494,725 - - - 6,312,969 1. Montgomery New Work Point Lock & Dam Approp. - - 3,338,000 44,483,000 47,821,000 Cost - - 3,314,818 30,704,610 34,019,428 16. Black River New Work Poplar Bluff, MO Approp. Cost New work Contrib. Cost 46,200 74,400 44,433 37,029 23,100 16,388 - 333,000 36,196 305,248 - 40,300 0 - - 32,288 17. Blue Mountain New Work Lake, AR Approp. - - - - 5,069,974 Cost - - - - 5,069,974 Maint. Approp. 1,059,000 939,859 1,025,000 884,662 20,459,420 2 Cost 1,083,819 930,550 1,011,237 880,107 20,441,102 2 18. Cato Springs New Work Branch, Approp. 12,300 159,000 -45,000 0 235,700 Fayetteville, AR Cost 15,769 118,989 -5,000 201 235,700 New Work Contrib. 12,400 -2 1,002 0 36,900 Cost 1,711 5,911 5,000 0 36,121 19. Clearwater Lake, New Work MO Approp. - - - - 10,406,300# Cost - - - - 10,406,300 Maint. Approp. 1,753,400 1,898,900 2,008,978 2,178,054 41,846,733 Cost 1,930,001 1,828,237 1,996,594 2,193,323 41,849,618 Major Rehab. Approp. - - - - 12,087,910 2 Cost - - - 0 12,087,910 2 20. DeQueen Lake New Work Little River Approp. - - - - 19,629,753 Basin, AR Cost - - - - 19,623,752 Maint. Approp. 915,900 979,624 996,000 884,906 15,883,2312 Cost 900,066 892,504 850,893 970,167 15,725,256 2 37-17 498,600 459,284 63,400 48,676 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Table 37-A (Continued) Cost And Financial Statement See Total Section Cost to in Text Project Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 Sept. 30, 1998 21. Dierks Lake, New Work Little River Approp. - - - - 16,002,903 Basin, AR Cost - - - - 16,002,781 Maint. Approp. 1,043,860 810,747 1,027,000 855,167 16,136,318 2 Cost 1,208,048 799,002 872,216 994,846 16,051,907 2 22. Dry Jordon New Work Creek, Approp. 100,000 134,200 -40,000 -36,700 157,500 Harrison, AR Cost 61,143 65,404 30,944 10 157,500 23. Fourche Bayou New Work Basin, Little Rock, AR Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 200,000 260,000 232,000 763,807 382,371 192,028 - 20,000 13,000 0 20,572,0003 101,934 20,600,193 3 1,731,678 1,717,768 24. Gillham Lake, New Work Little River Approp. - - - - 17,827,111 Basin, AR Cost - - - - 17,827,111 Maint. Approp. 744,600 833,693 960,000 662,228 14,804,664 2 Cost 815,125 750,243 651,664 941,833 14,775,933 2 26. Mill Creek, New Work Fort Smith, Approp. 250,700 15,000 300,000 -18,000 4,900,001 2 AR Cost 252,235 13,410 548 287,836 4,764,419 2 New Work Contrib. - - - -281,391 299,261 Cost 13,301 - - -281,391 299,261 27. Millwood Lake, New Work Little River Approp. - - - - 46,087,382 Basin, AR Cost - - - - 46,087,382 Maint. Approp. 1,841,900 1,860,934 1,781,000 1,488,369 39,406,522 2 Cost 1,935,814 1,684,911 1,770,389 1,562,375 39,469,917 2 28. Nimrod Lake, New Work AR Approp. - - - - 4,092,826 Cost - - - - 4,092,826 Maint. Approp. 1,238,000 1,087,468 1,276,000 1,317,095 25,475,630 Cost 1,302,071 1,110,018 1,123,501 1,441,733 25,447,770 29. White River New Work Basin, AR & MO Approp. 435,000 - - - 342,618,387 (Little Rock Cost 2,408,684 - - - 342,439,802 District) Maint. Approp. 22,544,564 23,169,649 24,184,548 - 455,085,012# Cost 24,257,381 23,363,092 23,790,468 - 454,690,932# 37-18 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT Table 37-A (Continued) Cost And Financial Statement See Total Section Cost to in Text Project Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 Sept. 30, 1998 30. White River, New Work Batesville, AR Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 236,000 1,867,309 160,000 -48,000 128,929 1,581,848 454,832 33,232 184,472 33,524 140,948 7,006 0 990 2,687,409 2,668,036 184,472 182,468 31. White River, New Work Jacksonport, Approp. 40,000 67,691 -5,000 -10,000 92,691 AR Cost 15,967 18,696 56,647 1,318 92,628 New Work Contrib. 35,000 282,500 - -84,473 233,027 Cost - 53,208 177,361 2,418 232,988 35. Beaver Lake, New Work AR Approp. - - - - 46,183,033 Cost - - - - 46,183,033 Maint. Approp. 3,744,500 3,276,283 3,792,400 3,810,120 74,044,231 Cost 3,924,452 3,433,577 3,632,443 4,108,798 74,182,951 Major Rehab. Approp. 4,199,000 - -32,147 - 33,571,573 Cost 5,304,009 37,149 1,360 - 27,410,331 35. Beaver Lake, New Work Water Quality Approp. - -98,000 12,000 0 4,304,000 Cost 1,167,202 112,305 67,876 0 4,281,998 New Work Contrib. 41,285 22,400 1,390 0 557,406 Cost 39,417 31,300 1,415 20 540,123 35. Beaver Lake, New Work Infrastructure Approp. - - 0 0 3,000,000 Cost 11,817 - 2,965,847 3,633 2,991,577 36. Bull Shoals New Work Lake, AR Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - - - 88,857,611 - - - - 88,857,611 4,430,000 5,588,900 5,076,000 4,402,706 109,488,316 2 5,085,829 5,528,529 5,044,334 4,553,436 109,607,380 2 37. Dardanelle Lock New Work & Dam (No. 10) Approp. - - - - 84,270,124 AR Cost - - - - 84,261,240 Maint. Approp. 5,479,500 6,207,304 6,150,500 6,608,568 107,213,160 2 Cost 5,765,881 5,174,177 6,397,614 7,413,260 107,281,137 2 Major Rehab. Approp. 823,000 2,438,000 5,216,000 5,217,000 15,334,000 Cost 1,375,065 2,773,356 5,261,790 5,183,761 15,284,470 37-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Table 37-A (Continued) Cost And Financial Statement See Total Section Cost to in Text Project Funding FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 Sept. 30, 1998 38. Greers Ferry New Work Lake, AR Approp. - - - - 48,865,512 Cost - - - - 48,865,512 Maint. Approp. 4,769,800 4,247,060 4,487,100 4,474,250 95,312,785 2 Cost 4,622,640 4,485,247 4,391,651 4,631,513 95,374,599 2 39. Norfork Lake, New Work AR Approp. - - - - 74,578,929 Cost - - - - 70,701,629 Maint. Approp. 3,896,500 3,136,263 3,469,000 3,122,143 78,182,2612 Cost 4,383,323 3,188,343 3,347,796 3,144,674 78,083,588 2 40. Ozark-Jeta New Work Taylor Lock & Approp. - - - - 85,629,412 Dam (No. 12), Cost - - - - 85,629,412 AR Maint. Approp. 3,338,700 3,753,347 3,991,000 3,381,029 80,004,294 Cost 3,491,398 3,342,746 3,760,321 3,601,746 79,879,787 41. Table Rock Lake, New Work MO Approp. - - 1,015,000 951,000 69,043,875 Cost - - 944,116 972,326 68,994,318 Maint. Approp. 5,384,700 5,022,243 5,351,070 5,180,801 108,630,384 2 Cost 6,241,137 4,899,159 5,377,651 6,060,460 109,536,624 2 45. Nimrod New Work Waterfowl Approp. 37,000 9,000 26,200 0 72,200 Levee Cost 17,153 23,997 29,481 1,569 72,201 New Work Contrib. - - 24,100 0 24,100 Cost - - 20,000 3,152 23,152 47. Morgan Point New Work Bendway Approp. 5,000 288,000 -100,000 0 203,000 Closure Cost - 130,641 52,861 9,194 202,696 Structure, New Work Arkansas River Contrib. - - 270,700 0 270,700 Cost - - - 0- 1. For more details on project funds, see text for individual projects. 2. Beginning data shown in Table 37-A includes special recreation use fees. 3. Includes funds for plans and specifications. 4. Includes total project cost, including study cost. 37-20 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT Table 37-B Authorizing Legislation Date of Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized Documents June 28, 1938 August 18, 1941 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, AR, OK, & KS (See Section 1 of text) Approved General comprehensive plan: Mannford Reservoir, OK Oologah Lake, OK Canton Lake, OK Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK Wister Lake, OK Blue Mountain Lake, AR Nimrod Lake, AR Modified comprehensive plan to include reservoirs in Grand (Neosho) River Basin, OK, and Mo, and in Verdigris River Basin: Markham Ferry Reservoir, OK Fort Gibson Lake, OK Pensacola Reservoir Lake O' The Cherokees, OK Fall River Lake, KS Elk City Lake, KS Toronto Lake, KS Neodosha Lake, KS Authorized Chief of Engineers to provide in the Canton Lake 69,000 acre-feet of irrigation storage, subject to certain conditions. Approved multiple-purpose plan: Oologah Lake, OK Markham Ferry Reservoir, OK Fort Gibson Lake, OK Blackburn Reservoir, OK Mannford Reservoir, OK Taft Reservoir, OK Bank stabilization Dardanelle Lock and Dam, AR Eufaula Lake, OK Navigation locks and dams Ozark Lock and Dam, AR Short Mountain Lock and Dam, OK Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, OK Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK June 30, 1948 Modified Arkansas River navigation comprehensive plan H. Doc 758, 79th Cong., 2d sess. to include bank protection works at Bradens Bend, OK. 37-21 Flood Control Corn. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 107 and 440, 76th Con., 1st sess. H. Doc 758, 79th Cong. 2d sess. H. Doc 758, 79th Cong. 2d sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Table 37-B (Continue Date of Authorizing Act May 17, 1950 d) Authorizing Legislation Project and Work Authorized Modified comprehensive plan authorized in 1938 Flood Control Act and multiple-purpose plan authorized in River and Harbor Act of 1946 to provide for substituting Keystone Lake Mannford, Blackburn and Taft Reservoirs. July 14, 1960 November 17, 1986 June 10, 1948 July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 July 24, 1946 Authorized incorporation of River and Harbor and Flood Control plans into a single plan of development and made all pervious authorizations applicable to combined plan of development. Fourche Bayou Basin, Little Rock, AR (See Section 26 of text.) Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR (See Section 30 of text.) RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM INCLUDING LITTLE RIVER BASIN, OK AND AR (See Section 26 of text) Construct Boswell, Hugo, and Millwood Lakes, and Bank Stabilization Modified Millwood: Construct Pine Creek, Lukfata, Broken Bow, DeQueen, Gillham, Dierks Lakes Emergency streambank erosion protection, Red River, Little River Co., AR Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662, Sec. 401. Section 205, P.L. 80-858. Authorized by Asst. Sec. of the Army (CW), 10/14/88. H. Doc. 602, 79t Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 170, 85t h Cong., 1st sess. Section 14, PL 79-526 WHITE RIVER BASIN (LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT) (See Section 34 of text) June 28, 1938 August 18, 1941 September 3, 1954 October 23, 1962 Approved comprehensive plan for White River Basin: Lone Rock Lake, AR, Norfork Lake, AR, Clearwater Lake, MO, Water Valley Lake, AR, Bell Foley Lake, AR, Greers Ferry Lake, AR, and White River emergency. Modified comprehensive plan to include Bull Shoals Lake, AR, and MO, Table Rock Lake, MO, and AR, and Norfork Lake, AR, and MO (power). Authorized power in Greers Ferry Reservoir and added Beaver Lake to the plan. Authorizing clearing and straightening of channel for Village Creek, Jackson and Lawrence Counties. Flood Control Com. Doc 1, 75t Cong., I1st sess. H. Doc. 917, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 290, 77t Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 499, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc 352, 87t Cong., 2d sess. 37-22 Documents LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT Table 37-B (Continued) Authorizing Legislation Date of Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized Documents March 1, 1974 May 11, 1962 October 22, 1976 June 30, 1948 TABLE 37-C Authorizing highway bridge construction across Norfork Lake Environmental restoration of wetlands and fish and wildlife resources in the White River Basin. AR and MO. (See Section 33 of text.) White River Fish Hatchery, Arkansas provides for trout production facilities downstream from Beaver Dam. White River, Batesville, AR. (See Section 35 of text.) Other Authorized Navigation P For Last Fe Full Report See Annual Project Report For Coi Flood Control Corn. Doc. 1, 75" Cong., 1st sess. Senate Report 102-344; Energy & Water Development Appropriations Act, 1993, PL 102-377 Water Resources Development Act of 1976, P.L. 94-587, Sec. 105. Section 205, P.L. 80-858, construction be approved by ASA (CW). rojects deral Cost thru Sept. 30, 1998 Operation and istruction Maintenance Arkansas River, Little Rock Slackwater Harbor, AR Black River, AR and MO 2 Current River, AR and MO 2 Upper White River, AR 4.. White River, AR (above Peach Orchard Bluff)z 3 White River, Jacksonport, AR6 1988 1950 1964 1952 1950 1984 $736,869 80,000 17,0003 83,197 $930,324 132,178 1,788,374 785,666 43,110 1. Completed. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Sec. 107, 1960 R 8 H Act, as amended, (P.L.86-645). 2. Channel adequate for existing commerce; completion not contemplated. 3. Includes $7,000 for previous project. 4. Federal operation and maintenance terminated June 30, 1952, due to lack of commerce. Facilities at Locks and Dams Nos. 1,2, and 3 disposed of in accordance with authority in Public Law 996, 84th Congress. 5. Completed. 6. Responsibility for maintenance of project downstream from Newport, AR; transferred to Memphis District in FY 62. 37-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 37-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1998 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Bell Foley Lake, White River, AR1 Inactive 1975 $1,432,116 - Black River, Butler County Road 607, MO Completed 1985 44,500 - Black River, Poplar Bluff, MO, to Knobel, AR Completed 1958 84,315 - Butler County Drainage District 3, MO Completed 1983 42,172 - Carden's Bottom Drainage District No. 2, Completed 1951 919,955 - Arkansas River, AR Cato Springs, Fayetteville, AR Completed. 1996 426,000 - Clarksville, AR Completed 1962 271,717 - Conway County Drainage and Levee District Completed 1959 187,440 - District No. 1, Arkansas River, AR Conway County Levee Districts Nos. 1, Completed 1952 1,018,840 - 2, and 8, Arkansas River, AR Conway County Levee District No. 6, Completed 1952 390,952 - Arkansas River, AR Crawford County Levee District, AR Completed 1983 53,506 - Crawford County Levee District, Arkansas Completed 1954 2,001,820 - River, AR Crooked Creek, Harrison, AR Completed 1995 1,245,000 - Curia Creek Drainage District, Completed 1983 117,898 - Independence County, AR East Poplar Bluff and Poplar Bluff, MO Completed 1958 304,699 - Faulkner County Levee District No. 1, Completed 1941 99,511 - Arkansas River, AR Fort Smith, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1951 1,077,546 - From North Little Rock to Gillett, AR Completed 1954 845,300 - (above Plum Bayou) Fourche Creek, Little Rock, AR2 Cancelled 1973 22,890 - Jackson County Levee District 2 Completed 1986 131,699 - White River, AR Little Massard Creek, Fort Smith, AR Completed 1983 198,096 - Little Red River District 1, AR Completed 1988 28,968 - Little Red River, White County Road Completed 1983 63,355 - Bridge, Judsonia, AR Little Rock Levee, AR, East End Completed 1975 1,901,899 - Fourche Bayou, AR McLean Bottom Levee District No. 3, Completed 1950 422,549 - Arkansas River, AR Near Dardanelle, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1953 198,069 - Newport, White River, AR Completed 1941 314,276 - North Little Rock, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1958 512,001 - Otter Creek and Tributaries Completed 1987 162,204 - Shannon Hills, AR Petit Jean River, AR Completed 1966 84,350 - Petit Jean River, AR Completed 1991 88,379 - Pine Mountain Lake, AR3 Inactive 1985 1,432,331 - Point Remove Levee and Drainage Completed 1983 86,943 - District, Conway County, AR Red River, 1-30, Little River Co., AR Completed 1992 119,897 - Red River, Hwy. 31, Little River Co., AR Completed 1992 144,828 - Roland Drainage District, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1950 269,907 - Rolling Fork River, Sevier County, AR Completed 1983 64,500 - 37-24 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT TABLE 37-E (Cont.) Other Authorized Flood Control Projects For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1998 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Skaggs Ferry, Black River, AR Completed 1941 81,023 - South Bank, Arkansas River (Head Fourche Completed 1964 1,404,852 - Island to Pennington Bayou), AR South Bank, Arkansas River, Little Rock to Completed 1961 409,115 - Pine Bluff, AR, Tucker Lakes Swan Creek Bank Stab., Taney County, MO Completed 1986 76,800 - Van Buren, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1952 438,222 - Village Creek, White River, and Mayberry Completed 1972 1,567,156 - Levee Districts, AR4 Village Creek, Jackson and Inactive 1977 510,217 - Lawrence Counties, AR5 West of Morrilton, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1962 1,269,959 - White River, at Hwy 14, '/4 mile east Completed 1981 214,308 - of Oil Trough, AR White River Bank Stab., Batesville, AR Completed 1986 101,100 - White River, Jacksonport, AR6 Completed 1987 293,567 - White River, Newport, AR Completed 1989 93,929 - White River, St. Paul, AR Completed 1990 22,400 - 1. Reclassified as inactive in Jun '77; reviewed & deferred in May '85; funded for reevaluation (draft report dated Sep '89). 2. Construction of project cancelled because local interests failed to provide right-of-way for construction and maintenance. 3. Reclassified as inactive in Jul '85. 4. See H Doc 577.87th Cong for description. 5. Reclassified in Jun '77: local interests unable to meet local cooperation requirements; funded for reevaluation in FY 89; recommended to be placed in the inactive status. 6. Design deficiency correction to be completed 30 December 1996. TABLE 37-G Deauthorized Projects For Last Funds Expended Full Report See Annual Date Federal Contributed Project Report For Authority Deauthorized Funds Funds Crooked Creek Lake 1969 1990 & Levee, AR Lone Rock, Buffalo 1959 1977 $130,653 River, AR Prosperity Lake, MO 1989 864,000 Water Valley, Eleven 1959 1977 414,011 Point River, AR & MO 37-25 TABLE 37-H ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Elevation Depth on Miter Up- Upper Year stream Lock Pool Type of Opened to Total from Miles to Dimension Lift (feet, Upper Lower Character of Kind of Construc- Naviga- Estimated Feature Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) MSL) (feet) (feet) Foundation Dam tion tion Cost LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT Norrell Lock and Dam No. 1 Entrance Channel Lock No. 2 Wilbur D. Mills Dam (No. 2) Joe Hardin Lock and Dam No. 3 Emmett Sanders Lock and Dam (No. 4) Lock and Dam No. 5 David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No. 6) Murray Lock and Dam (No. 7) Toad Suck Ferry Lock and Dam (No. 8) Arthur V. Ormond Lock and Dam (No. 9) Dardanelle Lock and Dam (No. 10) Lock and Dam No. 11 8 east of AR Post, AR First 10.3 miles of system 6 east of AR Post, AR 3 southeast of AR Post, AR 5 north of Grady, AR 7 east of Pine Bluff, AR 4 southeast of Redfield, AR 12 southeast of Little Rock, AR 6 northwest of Little Rock, AR. 6 west of Conway, AR 3 southwest of Morrilton, AR 2 northwest of Dardanelle, AR Deleted 110 by 600 30 max 20 nom 110 by 600 28 max 110 by 600 20 llby 600 14 110 by 600 17 110 by 600 18 110 by 600 18 110 by 600 16 110 by 600 110 by 600 19 54 142 162 182 196 213 231 249 265 284 338 16 15 18 14 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 1967 $22,472,000 $43,649,000 1967 1968 1968 1968 1968 1968 1969 1969 1969 1969 $70,266,000 $38,040,000 $45,246,000 $31,710,000 $69,086,000 $46,076,000 $57,831,000 $37,798,000 $84,270,124 w o' O O O tn O 0 00 Hv oT1 TABLE 37-H Cont. ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Lock Elevation Depth on Miter Type of Total Up- Miles to Dimension Lift Upper Upper Lower Character of Kind of Construc- Year Estimated Feature stream Nearest Town (feet) (feet) Pool (feet) (feet) Foundation Dam tion Opened to Cost Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam (No. 12) James W. Trimble Lock and Dam (No. 13) TULSA DISTRICT James W. Trimble Lock and Dam (No. 13) W. D. Mayo Lock and Dam (No. 14) Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam (No. 15) Webbers Falls Lock and Dam (No.16) Chouteau Lock and Dam (No. 17) Newt Graham Lock and Dam (No.18) 110 by 600 34 372 18 15 20 7 east of 110 Fort Smith, AR by 600 4 east of Redland, OK 1 north of Cowlington, OK 1 northwest of Gore, OK 4 northwest of Okay, OK 8 southwest of Inola, OK 1969 $85,629,412 392 18 14 1969 $58,816,000 110 by 600 20 412 14 15 110 by 600 110 by 600 110 by 600 48 30 460 18 14 490 19 16 21 511 15 110 by 600 21 532 1970 $6,858,000 1970 $32,655,000 1970 $94,578,237 1970 $83,738,277 1970 $31,619,000 1970 $44,355,000 14 15 14 0 n. 1 east of Ozark, AR L) J NI J TABLE 37-H Cont. ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Additional features entering into cost of project Little Rock District: Bank stabilization and channel rectification, mile 33.7 to 362 and Upstream Lakes: Arkansas-White Cutoff, 100 percent complete....... $119,300,184 Oologah, 90.2 miles upstream from mouth, Verdigris River complete............................ .......... $ 46,722, Maintenance and repair fleet and marine terminals, complete... ........... ................. 10,247,000 Keystone, 638.8 miles upstream from mouth, Arkansas River, complete........ ...................... 123,170. Total, Little Rock District .............................. 814,362,720 Eufaula, 27 miles upstream from mouth, Canadian River, Navigation aids (U.S. Coast Guard) .............. ........ 2,268,000 complete ..................... 124,130, Tulsa District Subtotal............................. 294,023, w Bank stabilization and channel rectification, Short Mountain 6 to Fort Smith, complete.............................. 12,700,038 Total, Tulsa District...................... 603,277, 00 Maintenance and repair fleet and marine terminals, Total Project Cost 96 percent complete......... $ 1,419,908, complete..... ............................ 2,750,000 Subtotal................. $309,253,552 1. Navigation mileage from mouth of White River, except Dam No. 2, is 40.5 miles above mouth of Arkansas River. 2. Details in Tulsa District report. O 329 T ,773 t ,747 ,849 0 ,401 121 O rO TABLE 37-I ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: LAKES (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Drainage Height Reservoir Power Year or Above Area of Dam Capacity Development Percent Total Estim Lake and State River Mouth Nearest Town (sq mi) (feet) Type (acre-feet) (kilowatts) Complete Cost BlueMountain,AR PetitJean 74.4 Paris, AR 488 115 Earthfill 257,900 --- 1947 $ 5,069, Canton, OK North Canadian 384.3 Canton, OK 12,483 68 Earthfill 383,300 --- 1948 11,209, Elk City, KS Elk 8.7 Independence, KS 634 107 Earthfill 284,300 --- 1966 19,052, (Table Mound) Eufaula, OK Canadian 27.0 Eufaula, OK 47,522 114 Earthfill 3,798,000 90,000 1964 123,795, Fall River, KS Fall 54.2 Fall River, KS 585 94 Earthfill 256,400 --- 1949 10,550, Fort Gibson, OK Grand (Neosho) 7.7 Fort Gibson, OK 12,492 110 Concrete- 1,284,400 45,000 1953 43,821, Keystone, OK Arkansas 538.8 Sand Springs, OK 74,506 121 gravity 1,836,500 70,000 1964 123,171, Markham Ferry, OK Grand (Neosho) 47.4 Pryor, OK 11,533 90 Earthfill 444,500 100,000 1968 6,908, Neodesha, KS Verdigris 222.8 Neodesha, KS 1,152 74 Earthfill 90,000 --- 0 97, Nimrod, AR Fourche La Fave 62.6 Plainview, AR 680 103 Earthfill 336,010 --- 1942 4,092, N Oologah, OK Verdigris 90.2 Claremore, OK 4,339 137 Concrete- 1,519,000 --- 1974 37,029, ' Pensacola.OK Grand (Neosho) 77.0 Disney, OK 10,298 147 gravity 2,197,000 86,400 1940 52, Tenkiller Ferry, OK Illinois 12.8 Gore, OK 1,610 197 Earthfill 1,230,800 34,000 1953 25,963, Toronto, KS Verdigris 271.5 Toronto, KS 730 90 Concrete arch 199,700 --- 1960 13,896, Wister, OK Poteau 60.9 Wister, OK 993 99 Earthfill 427,900 --- 1949 10,687, Subtotal, exclusive of Eufaula, Keystone, and Oologah. 151,403, Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK and KS; Navigation (Table 28-H). 1,419,908, Total, Arkansas River Basin, 96 percent complete. 1,571,312, 1.Project includes facilities for production of hydroelectric power. 2.Cost included in navigation project. 3.Details in Tulsa District report. 4.Constructed by State of Oklahoma under the name of Robert S. Kerr Dam (Lake Hudson). Estimate shown is for Federal participation. 5.Inactive. Estimate is based on 1954 price levels. 6.Constructed by State of Oklahoma under the name Grand River Dam (Lake O The Cherokees). Estimate shown is for Federal participation. ated 974 834 990 907 873 405 173 756 910 826 tri 928 0 126 540 324 439 d 997 0 121 ,118 TABLE 37-J LITTLE RIVER BASIN, AR: LAKES (See Section 26 of Text) Project River Site Nearest Town DeQueen Lake Rolling Fork River 22.8 DeQueen, AR Gillham Lake Cossatot River 49 Gillham, AR Dierks Lake Saline River 56.6 Dierks, AR Millwood Lake Little River 16 Millwood, AR 1. Project is reprted separately herein. TABLE 37-K WHITE RIVER BASIN; AR, AND MO: LAKES (See Section 34 of Text) Miles Drainage Height Reservoir Power Above Area of Dam Capacity Development Total Estimated Lake River Mouth Nearest Town (sq mi) (feet) Type (acre-feet) (kilowatts) Cost Beaver' White 609 Eureka Springs, AR 1,186 228 Concrete-gravity & earthfill 1,952,000 112,000 $ 52,631,472 Bell Foley2 Strawberry 27.2 Poughkeepsie, AR 519 136 Concrete-gravity & earthfill 518,000 -- 93,700,000 Bull Shoals' White 418.6 Mountain Home, AR 6,036 258 Concrete-gravity 5,408,000 340,000 96,356,000 Clearwater' Black 257.4 Piedmont, MO 898 154 Earthfill 413,000 -- 22,462,553 Greers Ferry' Little Red 79.0 Heber Springs, AR 1,146 243 Concrete-gravity 1,844,000 96,000 55,125,000 Norfork' North Fork 4.8 Norfork, AR 1,806 216 Concrete-gravity 1,983,000 80,550 111,624,000 Table Rock' White 523.8 Branson, MO 4,020 252 Concrete-gravity & earthfill 3,462,000 200,000 71,233,000 Total 15,580,000 828,550 503,132,025 1. For details see individual reports. 2. Inactive -placed in a deferred status in May 1985. Estimate based on 1983 price levels. w w 0 bO H0 H '3 trl tn 0 a z 0 H H n CTJ O 00 o 00 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT * TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT The civil works boundry of the Tulsa District includes an area of approximately 160,000 square miles covering Oklahoma and parts of Kansas and Texas within the Arkansas and Red River Basins. The District's responsibilities within the Arkansas River Basin cover southern Kansas, northern Oklahoma, and the Texas Panhandle. These areas are included in the drainage basin of the Arkansas River and its tributaries above the mouth of the Poteau River, extending to the Kansas- Colorado State line, exclusive of that portion of the South Canadian River Basin and its tributaries west of the Texas-New Mexico State line. The District's responsibilities within the Red River Basin cover the northern portion of Texas, and the southern portion of Oklahoma. These areas are embraced in the drainage basin of the Red River and its tributaries above Index, Arkansas. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, OK 2. Other Authorized Navigation Projects Flood Control 3. 4. 5. 5a. 5b. 5c. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Arcadia Lake, OK Arkansas City, KS Arkansas-Red River Basins Chloride Control Projects, KS, OK, and TX Area V, Estelline Springs, TX Area VIII, TX Red River Basin Chloride Control, TX & OK Birch Lake, OK Bowie County Levee, TX Candy Lake, OK Canton Lake, OK Copan Lake, OK Council Grove Lake, KS El Dorado Lake, KS Elk City Lake, KS Fall River Lake, KS Fort Supply Lake, OK Fry Creeks, Bixby, OK Great Bend, KS Great Salt Plains Lake, OK Halstead, KS Heyburn Lake and Polecat Creek, OK 21. Hugo Lake, OK 38-2 22. Hulah Lake, OK 38-2 23. John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, KS 24. Kaw Lake, OK 25. Lake Kemp, TX 26. Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, TX 27. Marion Reservoir, KS 38-2 28. McGrath Creek, Wichita Falls, TX 38-3 29. Mingo Creek, OK 30. Oologah Lake, OK 38-3 31. Optima Lake, OK 38-3 32. Parker Lake, OK 38-3 33. Pat Mayse Lake, TX 34. Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake, KS 38-4 35. Pine Creek Lake, TX 38-4 36. Sardis Lake, OK 38-4 37. Skiatook Lake, OK 38-4 38. Toronto Lake, KS 38-5 39. Tulsa & West Tulsa Levees, OK 38-5 40. Waurika Lake, OK 38-5 41. Winfield, KS 38-5 42. Wister Lake, OK 38-5 38-6 43. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 38-6 44. Inspection of Completed Local 38-6 Flood Protection Projects 45. Scheduling Flood Control 38-6 38-6 Reservoir Operations 38-6 46. Emergency Flood Control Activities 38-7 47. Flood Control Work Under 38-7 Special Authorization 38-1 Page 38-7 38-7 38-7 38-8 38-8 38-8 38-8 38-8 38-9 38-9 38-9 38-9 38-10 38-10 38-10 38-10 38-10 38-10 38-11 38-11 38-11 38-11 38-12 38-12 38-12 38-12 38-12 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Tables 48. Broken Bow Lake, OK 49. Eufaula Lake, OK 50. Fort Gibson Lake, OK 51. Keystone Lake, OK 52. Lake Texoma (Denison Dam), OK & TX 53. Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, OK 54. Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK 55. Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, OK 38-12 38-12 38-13 38-13 38-13 38-13 38-13 38-14 General Investigations 56. Surveys 57. Collection and Study of Basic Data 38-14 38-14 38-A Cost and Financial Statement 38-B Authorizing Legislation 38-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects 38-D Not Applicable 38-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 38-F Not Applicable 38-G Deauthorized Projects 38-H Arkansas River Basin Multiple-Purpose Plan 38-I Inspection of Completed Local Flood Protection Projects 38-J Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization 38-K General Investigations Navigation 1. McCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM (Tulsa District Portion), OK. Location. The Tulsa District portion of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System provides a navigation route up the Arkansas River from the Oklahoma-Arkansas State line to the head of navigation at Catoosa, OK, near Tulsa, OK. The total length of the Tulsa District portion of the system is 137 navigation miles. Descriptions and costs for the entire navigation system can be found in Little Rock District's entry in this Annual Report. Existing projects. The McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River navigation project is a component of the multiple- purpose plan for the Arkansas River Basin which provides for the improvement of the basin through the construction of coordinated developments for navigation, hydroelectric power, flood control, water supply, water quality control, sediment control, recreation, and fish and wildlife propagation. The McClellan- Kerr project also includes bank stabilization, channel straightening, and cutoffs as required. The navigation channel has a minimum depth of 9 feet and minimum widths of 250 feet on the Arkansas River and 150 feet on the Verdigris River. The Tulsa District portion of the navigation system consists of Arkansas River Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification, Chouteau Lock and Dam, Newt Graham Lock and Dam, Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, Sans Bois Navigation Channel, W.D. Mayo Lock and Dam, Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, and the pool in Oklahoma which was created by Lock and Dam 13 in Arkansas. The other parts of the multiple-purpose plan for the Arkansas River Basin are listed in Table 29-H. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Public port facilities are in operation at Muskogee and Catoosa, OK, and at Fort Smith, AR. Other private commercial port facilities are complete and in operation at eight Oklahoma locations. Operations and results during fiscal year. A new electrical feeder line to Chouteau Lock and Dam was installed to provide a dependable power supply. A contract to construct a new dredge disposal area upstream of the Chouteau Lock was awarded in August 1998, and will be completed in early FY 99. A contract to replace the tainter gate hoist cables at W.D. Mayo Lock and Dam was awarded in September 1998 and will be completed in FY 99. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 2. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS. See Table 38-C. Flood Control 3. ARCADIA LAKE, OK. Location. On the Deep Fork River, at river mile 218.3, in the metropolitan area of Oklahoma City and Edmond, OK, about 1.5 miles west of Arcadia, in 38-2 38-15 38-24 38-27 38-27 38-28 38-28 38-29 38-29 38-30 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT Oklahoma County, OK. (See Arcadia, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for flood control, water supply, and recreation by construction of an earthfill dam approximately 102 feet high and 5,250 feet long with a high-level uncontrolled spillway. Outlet works consist of a gated tower and conduit. The lake has a total capacity of 92,000 acre-feet (27,380 for conservation, 64,430 for flood control, and 190 for sedimentation reserve), and controls a 105-square-mile drainage area. Construction began in October 1980, and the project became operational for flood control in November 1986. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 4. ARKANSAS CITY, KS. Location. Arkansas City is located approximately 4 miles north of the Kansas-Oklahoma state line at the crossroads of U.S. Highway's 77 and 166, in Cowley County, KS, immediately northwest of the confluence of the Arkansas and Walnut Rivers. Existing project. The project consists of raising and extending approximately 6 miles of levee along the Arkansas and Walnut Rivers, and rechanneling approximately 2-1/2 miles of the Walnut River. Structural steel gates will be constructed at two railroad/ river crossings and stoplog structures will be constructed at two U.S. Highway/river crossings. Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed on September 4, 1996. The city of Arkansas City, the local sponsor, are currently fulfilling their requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. Phase I construction is complete. Phase II will begin in FY 99. 5. ARKANSAS-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL PROJECTS, KS, OK, AND TX. Location. On certain tributary streams of the Arkansas and Red Rivers in the western half of the Tulsa District. Existing project. The project was initiated as a result of studies involving the control of water pollution caused by 15 natural salt sources identified in 1957 by the U.S. Public Health Service. The Arkansas and Red Rivers are major national and regional water resources which are severely limited due to poor water quality primarily caused by the natural pollutant, sodium chloride. The Arkansas River is polluted by five naturally occurring salt sources located in northwestern Oklahoma and southwestern Kansas. The Red River Basin is polluted by 10 naturally occurring salt sources located in northwestern Texas, and southwestern Oklahoma. Preliminary Feasibility Studies included the construction and subsequent maintenance of an injection well and a ring dike used for data collection. Preauthorization studies completed in 1966 and 1970 recommended construction of project features at 13 of the 15 chloride emission areas. For a detailed discussion of the chloride control projects, see page 19-4 of the Annual Report for 1983. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) authorized the Red River Basin and the Arkansas River Basin as separate projects with separate authority under Section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1966. The Arkansas River portion of the project was deferred in 1982 (not economically justified). 5a. AREA V, ESTELLINE SPRINGS, TX. Location. Chloride Control Area V is located about 0.5 mile east of Estelline, TX, on the Prairie Dog Town Fork of the Red River. Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see the Annual Report for 1987. Construction started in 1963, and the structure was completed in 1964. Local cooperation. Descriptive text concerning local cooperation requirements is given on page 19-5 of the Annual Report for 1983. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 5b. AREA VIII, TX. Location. Chloride Control Area VIII is located at river mile 74.9, of the South Fork of the Wichita River, in King County, TX, about 5 miles east of Guthrie, TX. Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of a low-flow brine collection dam (the Bateman Low-Flow Dam) with attendant pumping station and pipeline facilities. The collected brine is pumped to the storage reservoir behind the Truscott Brine Dam. This brine dam, located at river mile 3.6 on Bluff Creek (a tributary of the North Fork of the Wichita River) about 3 miles northwest of Truscott, TX, contains collected brine from Area VIII and will contain brine collected in the future from Area X. Construction was initiated at Area VIII and Truscott Brine 38-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Dam in 1976. The Bateman Low-Flow Dam was completed and put into full operation in May 1987. Local cooperation. Descriptive text concerning local cooperation requirements is given on page 19-5 of the Annual Report for 1983. Operations and results during fiscal year. Microwave towers for the pipeline were installed. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 5c. RED RIVER BASIN CHLORIDE CONTROL, TX & OK. Location. The project is located in Cottle, Hall, and King Counties, TX, and Harmon County, OK, along the Wichita and Red Rivers. Area VI is located on the Elm Fork of the Red River in Harmon County, OK; Area VII is on the North Fork of the Wichita River, Cottle County, TX; Crowell Brine Dam is on Canal Creek, a tributary of the Pease River; Area IX is on the Middle Pease River, Cottle County, TX; Area X is on the Middle Fork of the Wichita River, King County, TX; and Areas XIII-XIV are on the Jonah and Salt Creeks of Prairie Dog Town Fork of the Red River, Hall County, TX. Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of one deep-well injection system, three brine storage reservoirs, four low-flow brine collection dams, two well collection facilities, six pumping plants, and 56.3 miles of pipeline. Construction was completed at the Area X, low-flow dam, pump station and access road in March 1994. A Limited Reevaluation Report containing a project economic reevaluation was approved in November 1993. Local Cooperation. Section 1107 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the project at full Federal expense. The Red River Authority of Texas has signed a 221 Agreement as the non-Federal sponsor. Operation and results during fiscal year. Estimated total cost of the project is $241,500,000 (October 1997 price level base). A draft Supplement to the Final Environmental Impact Study (SFEIS) was submitted for public review in May 1995. Finalization of the SFEIS has been put on hold indefinitely and the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works directed that a reevaluation of the Wichita River Basin be performed with available funding. 6. BIRCH LAKE, OK. Location. On Birch Creek at river mile 0.8, about 1.5 miles south of Barnsdall, in Osage County, OK. (See Barnsdall, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see the Annual Report for 1979. Construction began in November 1973, and the project was placed in useful operation in March 1977. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 7. BOWIE COUNTY LEVEE, TX. Location. Bowie County is located in northeastern Texas, along the Red River, near Texarkana, Texas. The Bowie County Levee is situated on the south side of the Red River and extends almost 9 miles from the Kansas City Southern Railroad embankment westward to an area near Wamba, Texas. (See Wamba, TX, Gelogical Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The project, as authorized under the Flood Control Act of 1946, provides for the rehabilitation of the existing Bowie County, Texas, Levee. The levee was constructed in 1913 by the Bowie County Levee District No. 1. The Bowie County Levee is part of a levee system which includes the Miller County Levee that extends downstream approximately 35 miles. The existing Bowie County Levee does not meet current design standards and has not received proper maintenance. Studies completed in 1994 indicated that no economically feasible flood control alternative was identified and Federal interest in pursuing detailed design and project construction was not warranted. Local cooperation. Additional legislation is required to allow the Government to build the levee proposed by the local sponsor. The Government has determined that this project will be cost-shared in accordance with the Flood Control Act of 1936. Operations and results during fiscal year. Design activities were initiated in FY 96, and final design will be completed in FY 97. 8. CANDY LAKE, OK. Location. On Candy Creek, a tributary of Bird Creek in the Verdigris River Basin, at river mile 1.9. The damsite is about 1.5 miles northeast of Avant in Osage County, OK. (See Avant, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for an earthfill dam about 4,200 feet long, 38-4 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT including an uncontrolled concrete spillway, with a maximum height of 103 feet above the streambed. Outlet works will consist of a gated intake structure, a 10x11.25-foot conduit, and a stilling basin. An 18x24-inch low-flow pipe and an 18-inch water supply pipe will be provided. The lake will have a total capacity of 75,420 acre-feet (44,160 for conservation and sediment reserve and 31,260 for flood control). The drainage area above the damsite is 43 square miles. Candy Lake will be operated as a unit of a seven-lake system for flood control in the Verdigris River Basin in Oklahoma. Construction began in September 1976. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of 1938, the Water Supply Act of 1958, and Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. In accordance with PL 99-662, 33 U.S.C. 579a 1001 (b)(2), the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works submitted a list of projects for deauthorization to Congress on January 8, 1993. Certain proj ects from this list, including Candy, were deauthorized on July 9, 1995. Senator Don Nickles and Congressman Coburn are seeking legislation to return the lands to the original owners. 9. CANTON LAKE, OK. Location. On the North Canadian River at river mile 394, about 2 miles north of Canton in Blaine County, OK. (See Canton, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 590 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in December 1940, and the project was placed in useful operation in April 1948. Local cooperation. The Canton Lake Committee was established to improve coordination and communication between the multi-purpose users of Canton Lake. The committee coordinates Oklahoma City's water supply release schedule with interested parties to minimize impacts.. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 10. COPAN LAKE, OK. Location. On the Little Caney River, a tributary of the Caney River, in the Verdigris River Basin, at river mile 7.4, about 2 miles west of Copan in Washington County, OK. (See Copan, KS, Geological Surveymap, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-7 of the Annual Report for 1983. Copan Lake is operated as a unit of a seven-lake system for flood control in the Verdigris River Basin in Oklahoma. Construction began in November 1972, and the project was placed in useful operation in April 1983. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 11. COUNCIL GROVE LAKE, KS. Location. On the Grand (Neosho) River at river mile 450, about 1.5 miles northwest of Council Grove, in Morris County, KS. (See Council Grove Lake, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 519 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in June 1959, and the project was placed in useful operation in July 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 12. EL DORADO LAKE, KS. Location. On the Walnut River, a tributary of the Arkansas River, at river mile 100.2, about 4 miles northeast of El Dorado in Butler County, KS. (See El Dorado, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-7 of the Annual Report for 1983. El Dorado Lake was authorized as a unit of a three-lake system for flood control in the Walnut River Basin. Construction began in October 1973, and impoundment began in June 1981. Project is complete. Local cooperation. By payment of $8.17 million on May 18, 1997, the Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks has fully complied with the Local Cooperation Agreement. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 13. ELK CITY LAKE, KS. 38-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Location. On the Elk River at river mile 8.7, about 7 miles northwest of Independence, in Montgomery County, KS. (See Table Mound, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 593 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in February 1962, and the project was placed in useful operation in March 1966. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 14. FALL RIVER LAKE, KS. Location. On the Fall River at river mile 54.2, about 4 miles northwest of Fall River, in Greenwood County, KS. (See Severy, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 953 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in May 1946, and the project was placed in full operation in April 1949. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 15. FORT SUPPLY LAKE, OK. Location. On Wolf Creek, a tributary of the North Canadian River, at river mile 5.5, about 12 miles northwest of Woodward, in Woodward County, OK. (See Fort Supply, OK, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 594 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in October 1938, and the project was placed in full flood control operation in May 1942. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 16. FRY CREEKS, BIXBY, OK. Location. In the northern part of the city of Bixby, in Tulsa County, OK. Existing project. The project consists of enlarging both Fry Creeks, diverting Fry Creek 1 into Fry Creek 2 and then diverting the combined creeks into the Arkansas River. The total length of the modified channels would total 4.3 miles, with bottom widths of 30 to 225 feet and depths of 6 to 12 feet. Three bridges will be constructed and 20 acres of land has been acquired for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses. Local Cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement was signed with the city of Bixby, OK, in January 1995. Operations and results during fiscal year. Estimated total cost of the project is $13,540,000 (October 1997 price level base). In September 1996, construction efforts were initiated on this project. 17. GREAT BEND, KS. Location. In Barton County, KS, on the north bank of the Arkansas River about 4.5 miles above its confluence with Walnut Creek. (See Great Bend, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The plan, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1965, provides for 6.2 miles of leveed channel to divert Walnut Creek flood flow around Great Bend into the Arkansas River upstream from the city; a 1.5-mile leveed channel to divert Little Walnut Creek flood flow into the Walnut Creek diversion levees along the Arkansas River; a tie-back levee 4.3 miles long on the Arkansas River left bank upstream from the junction of the Walnut diversion channel; and appurtenant facilities. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Financial closeout on this project was completed during FY 97. This project has been fully operational since June 1994. Estimated total cost of the project is $36,350,000 (October 1994 price level base). 18. GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE, OK. Location. On the Salt Fork of the Arkansas River at river mile 103.3, about 12 miles east of Cherokee, in Alfalfa County, OK. (See Jet, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 594 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction of the project began in September 1938, and was completedin July 1941. The project was placed in full flood control operation in May 1941. 38-6 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 19. HALSTEAD, KS. Location. In the city ofHalstead, in Harvey County, KS, along the Arkansas River. (See Halstead, KS, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Provides for channel modification and construction of about 4 miles of levee in combination with straightening and widening approximately 3.6 miles of the Little Arkansas River channel to a 50-foot-bottom width in the vicinity of Halstead. Channel modification will be restricted to one side of the channel except in transition areas. Tree planting and revegetation will be done and ten pool riffle areas will be established to minimize environmental impacts. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project is fully operational, however, the Corps is evaluating a construction contract claim on this project. This effort is expected to continue through the end of FY 99. 20. HEYBURN LAKE AND POLECAT CREEK, OK. Location. On Polecat Creek, a minor tributary of the Arkansas River, at river mile 48.6, about 11 miles west of Sapulpa, in Creek County, OK. (See Lake Heyburn, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 599 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction started in March 1948, and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1950. Channel improvements below the lake were completed in September 1952. Local cooperation. The channel improvement project below the lake was never maintained by the sponsor, Joint Drainage District No. 1, Tulsa and Creek Counties, OK. For this reason, the channel returned to its pre-project condition and does not provide flood protection for the affected area. The Corps of Engineers discontinued maintenance inspections of the channel project in 1982, due to the condition of the project and lack of cooperation on the part of the sponsor. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 21. HUGO LAKE, OK. Location. On the Kiamichi River at river mile 17.6, about 7 miles east of Hugo, in Choctaw County, OK. (See Hugo Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-12 of the Annual Report for 1977. Construction began in October 1967, and the project was placed in useful operation in January 1974. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 22. HULAH LAKE, OK. Location. On the Caney River at river mile 96.2, about 15 miles northwest of Bartlesville, near Hulah, in Osage County, OK. (See Bowring, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 595 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in May 1946, and was completed in June 1950. The project was placed in full flood control operation in September 1951. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. A contract was awarded in July 1998 to repair an area on the downstream side of the embankment where slides were occurring. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 23. JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR, KS. Location. The dam is located on the Grand (Neosho) River at river mile 343.7, about 2 miles northwest of Burlington, in Coffey County, KS. (See John Redmond Dam, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 581 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction was initiated in July 1959, and was completed in December 1965. The project was placed in flood control operation in July 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 38-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 24. KAW LAKE, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at river mile 653.7, about 8 miles east of Ponca City, in Kay County, OK. (See Charley Creek West, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-13 of the Annual Report for 1977. Construction began in June 1966, and the project was placed in operation in May 1976. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 25. LAKE KEMP, TX. Location. On the Wichita River at river mile 126.7, about 40 miles southwest of Wichita Falls, TX. (See Northeast Lake Kemp, TX, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-14 of the Annual Report for 1977. Construction began in May 1970, and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1972. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 26. LAKE WICHITA, HOLLIDAY CREEK, TX. Location. The project is located in Wichita and Archer Counties, TX. The Lake Wichita dam and the Holliday Creek channel are located in the city of Wichita Falls, TX. (See Wichita Falls, TX, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The existing Lake Wichita dam was replaced with an earthen dam approximately 16,000 feet long with a concrete spillway, an auxiliary spillway, and low-flow outlet works. Channel improvements along Holliday Creek from the new spillway to the Wichita River, a distance of 9.3 miles, were also constructed. Local cooperation. Fully compiled with. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project was completed October 1, 1996, and is fully operational. Estimated total project cost is $48,789,000 (October 1995 price level base). 27. MARION RESERVOIR, KS. Location. On the Cottonwood River at river mile 126.7, about 3 miles northwest of Marion, in Marion County, KS. (See Pilson, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 597 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in June 1964, and the project was placed in flood control operation in February 1968. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. A contract was awarded in December 1997 to replace the riprap on the upstream side of the embankment. The work began in July 1998 after the lake level was lowered, and the work was completed in FY 98. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 28. MCGRATH CREEK, WICHITA FALLS, TX. Location. The project is located in the northern central portion of Texas, in the city of Wichita Falls. Existing project. McGrath Creek is approximately 3,900 feet long and connects Sikes Lake and the recently constructed Holliday Creek project. The project involves realigning and concrete lining the McGrath Creek Channel, and constructing a new spillway to pass flows through Sikes Lake. Local cooperation. The city of Wichita Falls, TX, is the non-Federal sponsor. The Project Cooperation Agreement was executed in November 1994. Operations and results during fiscal year. Project construction is completed. Estimated total project cost is $13,520,000 (October 1996 price level base). 29. MINGO CREEK, OK. Location. On the right-bank tributary of Bird Creek in the city of Tulsa, in Tulsa County, OK. (See Tulsa, OK, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The recommended plan will consist of 23 detention sites, which would capture 38-8 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT peak flows and hold them temporarily until downstream flows subside. There will be about 9.4 miles of channelization in selected locations on the tributaries and main stem of Mingo Creek. Local cooperation. In accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the non-Federal sponsor must provide lands, easements, rights-ofway, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities where necessary in the construction of the project; pay five percent of the costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. The non-Federal sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. The local sponsor is the city of Tulsa, OK. The city has constructed 4.75 miles of channel and placed two excavated detention facilities into flood control operation prior to initiation of Federal construction in September 1988. The project is currently 90% complete. Operations and results during fiscal year. Reimbursement to date for work completed by the City of Tulsa is $19,000,000. Estimated total project cost is $119,200,000 (October 1997 price level base). Project completion is expected in FY 00. 30. OOLOGAH LAKE, OK. Location. On the Verdigris River at river mile 90.2, about 2 miles southeast of Oologah, in Rogers County, OK. (See Oologah, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-15 of the Annual Report for 1972. Construction began in July 1950, but the project was placed in standby status in October 1951. Construction resumed in December 1955, and was completed in May 1963 for initial development. Construction for ultimate (second stage) development was initiated in July 1967, and was completed in 1974. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 31. OPTIMA LAKE, OK. Location. On the North Canadian River at river mile 623.2, about 4.5 miles northeast of Hardesty, in Texas County, OK. (See Optima Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the existing improvement, see page 19-16 of the Annual Report for 1979. Construction began in March 1966, and impoundment began in October 1978. Construction was completed in 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 32. PARKER LAKE, OK. Location. On Muddy Boggy Creek, a tributary of the Red River, about 23 miles east of Ada, in Coal County, OK. (See Parker, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Parker Lake, if constructed, would be a multipurpose element in a plan of improvement for the Upper Muddy Boggy Creek Basin, OK. The project would consist of an earthfill dam about 2,200 feet long, a gated outlet works for flood control and water supply, and a 100-foot-wide spillway. The lake created would have a total storage capacity of 220,240 acre-feet and would yield 42 million gallons per day for municipal and industrial water supply. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The project has not been funded for construction, however, a Limited Project Review of the project is scheduled to be completed in March 1998. Federal accomplishment of single purpose municipal and industrial water supply projects is not in accord with current Administration priorities. Local cooperation. The Oklahoma Water Resources Board, the sponsor, has agreed to cost share in the flood control portion of the project and the water supply provided enough interested users for the water supply can be identified. Operation and results during fiscal year. Estimated total project cost is $71,400,000 (October 1992 price level base). 33. PAT MAYSE LAKE, TX. Location. On Sanders Creek, a tributary of the Red River, at river mile 4.6, about 12 miles north of Paris, in Lamar County, TX. (See Grant, TX, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 584 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in March 1965, 38-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 and the project was placed in full flood control operation in September 1967. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 34. PEARSON-SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE, KS. Location. On Big Hill Creek at river mile 33.3, about 4.5 miles east of Cherryvale, KS. (See Dennis, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-11 of the Annual Report for 1983. Construction began in April 1974, and impoundment began in March 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 35. PINE CREEK LAKE, OK. Location. On the Little River at river mile 145.3, about 5 miles northwest of Wright City, in McCurtain County, OK. (See Wright City, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 584 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in February 1963, and the project was placed in useful operation in June 1969. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 36. SARDIS LAKE, OK. Location. On Jackfork Creek, a tributary of the Kiamichi River, at river mile 2.8, about 2.5 miles north of Clayton, in Pushmataha County, OK. (See Yanush, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-11 of the Annual Report for 1983. Sardis Lake is operated as a unit of a two-lake system for flood control in the Kiamichi River Basin. (The other lake in the system is Hugo Lake). Construction began in August 1975, and the project became operational in January 1983. Local cooperation. The Oklahoma Water Resources Board (OWRB) failed to make satisfactory arrangements to pay for the Sardis Lake water supply storage as agreed toin a letter exchange of September 1997. On July 2, 1998, the state of Oklahoma was declared in default under the contract. On July 14, 1998, the Department of Justice (DOJ) filed suit in the Northern District Court of Oklahoma. The litigation has not moved forward because of a taxpayer "qui tam" suit filed in January 1998 in the Western District Court of Oklahoma against the OWRB and the United States. The suit between OWRB and the United States was postponed until a decision was reached on the taxpayer "qui tam" suit. On March 4, 1999, the Western District Court dismissed OWRB and the United States from the suit. The taxpayer group has 30 days to appeal. The DOJ will continue legal proceedings when the appeal process has lapsed in the "qui tam" suit. Operations and results during fiscal year. A new roof was constructed on the project office building. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 37. SKIATOOK LAKE, OK. Location. On Hominy Creek, a tributary of Bird Creek in the Verdigris River Basin, at river mile 14.3, about 5 miles west of Skiatook, in Osage County, OK. (See Avant S.E., OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see Page 19-8 of the Annual Report for 1987. Construction began in January 1974, impoundment began in October 1984, and the project became operational in November 1984. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. A dam safety project to rehabilitate the existing spillway was authorized with the approval of the Dam Safety Report in FY 97. A Detailed Design Report is now underway. Construction is scheduled to begin in FY 01. The total project cost is estimated to be $9,500,000 (October 1997 price levels). A waterborne shower/toilet is under construction in Twin Points Recreation Area. A wastewater treatment system for the facility was completed. Rural water will be installed for the area in FY 99. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 38. TORONTO LAKE, KS. Location. On the Verdigris River at river mile 271.5, about 4 miles southeast of Toronto, in Woodson 38-10 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT County, KS. (See Fredonia, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 600 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in November 1954, and the project was placed in full operation in March 1960. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 39. TULSA AND WEST TULSA LEVEES, OK. Location. On the banks of the Arkansas River near Tulsa, OK. On the left bank, the levee extends from river mile 531.0 near Sand Springs, OK, downstream to river mile 521.4 at Tulsa. On the right bank, the levee extends from near river mile 526.7 downstream to river mile 521.3 and is adjacent to the major portion of the business and residential districts in West Tulsa, Tulsa County, OK. Existing project. The Tulsa and West Tulsa Levees were completed by the Tulsa District in 1945. The project was turned over to the Tulsa County Drainage District No. 12 for operations and maintenance. The project consists of 3 levees with a total length of about 20 miles and an average height of 10 feet. The levees provide protection from flooding to property valued at approximately $1 billion dollars. Many of the drainage pipes that pass under the levee have deteriorated and levee material has eroded into the pipes leaving small cavities in the embankment. The Tulsa District completed an evaluation of the levees in September 1989, which determined that rehabilitation would be required for the levees to operate as designed. Funds to repair the levee were provided in FY 91 and FY 94 by the U.S. Congress. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was executed in March 1992, and Tulsa County and Levee District No. 12, the non-Federal sponsors, provided funds of $325,000 in March 1992. Approximately one-half of the project repairs have been completed to date. A supplement to the LCA and additional funding have been provided by the local sponsor to allow construction of Phase II. Operations and results during fiscal year. Phase I contract for repair of 23 of the 48 deficient pipes was awarded July 30, 1992, and completed in July 1993. Phase II construction is scheduled to be initiated in the summer of 1999. 40. WAURIKA LAKE, OK. Location. On Beaver Creek, a tributary of the Red River, at river mile 27.0, about 6 miles northwest of Waurika, in Jefferson County, OK. (See Hastings, OK-TX, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-12 of the Annual Report for 1983. Waurika Lake is operated as a unit of a coordinated lake system for flood control in the Red River Basin. Construction began in July 1971, and impoundment began in August 1977. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance continued. 41. WINFIELD, KS. Location. Winfield is located approximately 15 miles north of the Kansas-Oklahoma state line on U.S. Highway 77 in Cowley County, KS. The city is located immediately southeast of the confluence of the Walnut River and Timber Creek. Existing project. The project consists of raising and extending approximately 4 miles of levee along Timber Creek and the Walnut River. Road ramps will be constructed at two locations where city streets cross the Walnut River. Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was signed on September 4, 1996. The city of Winfield, the local sponsor, is currently fulfilling its requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded in FY 98. Construction should be completed in FY 00. Estimated total project cost is $8,777,000 (October 1996 price level base). 42. WISTER LAKE, OK. Location. On the Poteau River at river mile 60.9, about 2 miles south of Wister, in LeFlore County, OK. (See Wister, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 601 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in April 1946, and was completed in May 1949. The project was placed in full flood control operation in October 1949. 38-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 43. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS. See Table 38-E. 44. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS. Inspections of completed, Federally constructed local flood protection projects which are owned, operated, and maintained by local interests are made to determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for operations and maintenance. The inspections assist the Corps of Engineers in determining if the project provides the flood protection for which it was constructed. See Table 38-I for a list of projects inspected in FY 98. Fiscal year cost was $168,820. 45. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS. The Tulsa District Corps of Engineers is responsible for flood control operations at 12 non-Corps projects. These include nine Bureau of Reclamation lakes, two Grand River Dam Authority lakes, and one citycounty owned lake. All of these projects were constructed wholly or in part with Federal funds. Routine flood control releases were required at several of the projects. Fiscal year costs for scheduling flood control reservoir operations totaled $1,005,470 (includes $500,000 for a Congressional add on the Pensacola Reservoir, Grand Lake Flood Easement Adequacy Study). 46. EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES. Fiscal year cost for national emergency preparedness was $84,530; advance preparation was $156,104. 47. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION. See Table 38-J for FY 98 expenditures for Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Section 205); Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Projects (Section 14). Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 48. BROKEN BOW LAKE, OK. Location. On the Mountain Fork River at river mile 20.3, about 9 miles northeast of Broken Bow, in McCurtain County, OK. (See Broken Bow, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements, see page 29-17 of the Annual Report for 1971. Construction began in November 1961, and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1969. Power units 1 and 2 were placed in operation in January and June 1970, respectively. Local cooperation. The development of a trout fishery in the Mountain Fork River below Broken Bow Lake was implemented in 1989, in cooperation with the Corps of Engineers (Corps), Southwestern Power Administration, Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation, and the Oklahoma Water Resources Board. The operation of the trout stream has been cooperatively managed by a Memorandum of Understanding. The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (WRDA 96), Sec. 338, modified the project to provide for the reallocation of sufficient quantity of water supply storage space to support the Mountain Fork trout fishery at no expense to the State of Oklahoma. The District is waiting implementing guidance on WRDA 96. Operations and results during fiscal year. A new roof was constructed on the powerhouse and asbestos was removed from the powerhouse. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 49. EUFAULA LAKE, OK. Location. On the Canadian River at river mile 27.0, about 12 miles east of Eufaula, in McIntosh County, OK. (See Porum, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 588 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in December 1956, and the project was placed in full flood control operation in February 1964. There are numerous areas along the shoreline where private property is subject to flooding and erosion as a result of the construction and operation. Erosion problems in 38-12 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT numerous subdivisions bordering the lake were studied in 1989 and 1993. At this time, it is estimated that there are approximately 22 miles of shoreline in need of attention. Estimated costs for repair is approximately $15 million. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. An erosion repair contract has been completed at Hideaway Cove. A contract has been awarded to rehabilitate the floating tainter gate bulkhead. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 50. FORT GIBSON LAKE, OK. Location. On the Grand (Neosho) River at river mile 7.7, about 5 miles north of Fort Gibson, in Muskogee County, OK. (See Fort Gibson Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 604 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in March 1942, but was held in abeyance during World War II. Construction resumed in May 1946, and was completed in June 1950. The fourth generator was installed and the project placed in full operation in September 1953. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 51. KEYSTONE LAKE, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at river mile 538.8, near Sand Springs, OK, and about 15 miles west of Tulsa, OK. (See Keystone Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 589 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in January 1957, and the project was placed in flood control operation in September 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Structural repairs were made on the spillway. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 52. LAKE TEXOMA (DENISON DAM), OK AND TX. Location. On the Red River at river mile 725.9, about 5 miles northwest of Denison, TX. (See Denison Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 603 of the Annual Report for 1969. Lake Texoma is operated as a unit of a coordinated lake system for flood control in the Red River Basin. Construction started in August 1939, and was completed in February 1944. Commercial power generation was started in March 1945. Authorized work is complete except for installation of the third, fourth, and fifth power units. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. The powerhouse was converted from local control to remote control from the Robert S. Kerr Powerhouse. New equipment purchased and installed included: new SCADA equipment, microwave communication equipment, new control room switchboards, generator and transformer protection, auxiliary relays, DC breaker panels, essential AC panels, creep detectors for governors, shutdown and speed solinoids, and programmable logic controller to load setters. Also, the powerhouse received a new roof. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 53. ROBERT S. KERR LOCK AND DAM AND RESERVOIR, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at navigation mile 336.2, about 8 miles south of Sallisaw, in LeFlore County, OK. (See Robert S. Kerr, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-21 of the Annual Report for 1972. The Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir is a unit of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Construction began in April 1964, and closure was completed in October 1970. The lock and dam became operational for navigation in December 1970. Generating units 1, 2, 3, and 4 were placed in operation in October, July, September, and November 1971, respectively. Local cooperation. See section 1 of this report. Terminal facilities. Five sites have been developed for handling coal, grain, construction aggregates, and miscellaneous cargo. The facilities are considered adequate for present traffic. 38-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Operations and results during fiscal year. A new roof was constructed on the powerhouse and lock control building to accommodate the remoting of Denison powerhouse, a new DEMS (annunciation system) was added along with new SCADA equipment and a new operators control box. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 54. TENKILLER FERRY LAKE, OK. Location. On the Illinois River at river mile 12.8, 7 miles northeast of Gore, in Sequoyah County, OK. (See Gore, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 606 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in June 1947, and was completed in July 1953. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. A project to build an auxiliary spillway and to modify the existing spillway was authorized February 22, 1994, by the Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army, under the Dam Safety Assurance Program. Phase I and II will be awarded in FY 99. 55. WEBBERS FALLS LOCK AND DAM, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at navigation mile 366.6, about 5 miles northwest of Webbers Falls, in Muskogee County, OK. (See Webbers Falls, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-23 of the Annual Report for 1977. The Webbers Falls Lock and Dam is a unit of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Construction began in January 1965, and the project was placed in useful operation in November 1970. The lock and dam became operational for navigation in December 1970. Generating units 1, 2, and 3 were placed in operation in August, September, and November 1973, respectively. Local cooperation. See section 1 of this report. Terminal facilities. Facilities at the Port ofMuskogee include: a cargo pier, mooring dolphins, warehouse, terminal building, and fuel facility built by the Muskogee City-County Port Authority; a liquid cargo loading facility and a steel unloading facility built by Frontier Steel Company; grain holding facilities built by Conagra, Inc.; and a general-purpose private dock built by the Fort Howard Paper Company. The facilities are considered adequate for present traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. A cracked bull gear was removed from one of the generators and a contract for fabrication of a new gear was awarded in FY 97. A new bullgear is being fabricated by the contractor and it will be delivered in the first quarter of FY 99. A contract was awarded to purchase new slip rings. A contract for construction of a new dredge disposal area was awarded in FY 98. The work should be completed in the first quarter of FY 99. A new roof was constructed on the powerhouse. Routine operation and maintenance continued. General Investigations 56. SURVEYS. Fiscal year cost was $135,057, which included one flood damage prevention study; one special study; review of authorized projects; miscellaneous activities- special investigations, review of FERC licenses, and intragency water resources development; North American Waterfowl Management Plan; coordination with other Federal agencies, States, and non-Federal interests, and six Planning Assistance to States Studies. Table 38-K provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 57. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA. Fiscal year cost was $392,079, which includes floodplain management services. Table 38-K provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 38-14 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT Table 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep 30, 19981 1. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas New Work River Navigation System, Approp OK, (Tulsa District Portion) Cost Maint Approp Cost - 130,936,6382 - 130,936,6382 4,525,000 4,351,000 3,919,000 3,771,000 165,721,962 4,573,329 4,430,125 4,080,296 3,054,371 165,151,741 3. Arcadia Lake, OK -28,000 14,512 - 82,965,900 500 1,270 82,953,709 Maint Approp Cost 4. Arkansas City, KS (Contributed Funds) 5. Arkansas-Red River Basins Chloride Control, KS, OK, and TX New Work Approp Cost Contrib. Cost 301,000 305,100 459,700 257,686 322,128 351,059 354, 000 479,049 462,000 651,000 -95,000 1,878,000 354,615 189,780 274,651 1,903,566 265,000 New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 5a. Area V, Estelline Springs, TX New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 7,000 6,461 -1,000 1,041 900 900 1,200 1,275 5b. Area VIII, TX Maint Approp Cost 5c. Red River Basin Chloride New Work Control, TX & OK Approp Cost 978,000 1,218,700 1,556,100 1,198,000 10,952,048 964,210 1,181,429 1,518,053 1,297,175 10,936,976 11,468,000 -4,805,200 2,137,000 720,000 27,519,800 4,848,035 4,686,819 4,063,142 1,547,581 26,851,951 38-15 New Work Approp Cost 3,916,582 3,095,104 4,808,000 4,631,574 265,000 25,705,208 25,705,208 2,316,354 2,316,354 300,028 300,028 155,057 155,056 New Work Approp Cost 46,682,242 46,682,242 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Table 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep 80, 1998' 6. Birch Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost 13,549,170 13,549,170 Maint Approp Cost 7. Bowie County Levee, TX 8. Candy Lake, OK 9. Canton Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 648,000 545,700 553,200 619,845 565,467 541,678 600,000 500,000 100,000 104,558 537,251 487,934 25,000 19,770 13,400 19,118 15,100 8,116 496,000 12,557,866 498,447 12,530,174 45,000 79,025 3,500 10,244 New Work Approp Cost 1,820,000 1,782,694 4,927,922 4,927,922 213,270 213,019 11,209,834 11,209,834 1,731,000 1,976,600 1,737,000 1,456,500 31,915,868 1,756,383 1,914,609 1,682,862 1,562,995 31,868,304 10. Copan Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost -44,000 -200 835,000 870,550 678,900 917,655 905,816 640,770 -30,293 83,800,814 - 83,800,814 733,500 11,075,979 760,094 11,052,349 11. Council Grove Lake, KS New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 12. El Dorado Lake, KS New Work Approp Cost 11,810,509 11,810,509 1,040,000 1,017,600 1,134,800 1,070,000 18,571,310 1,002,187 1,034,025 1,112,760 1,067,444 18,505,393 2,064 5,781 29,369 - 92,413,349 26 92,413,343 406,000 429,700 430,500 372,675 460,637 419,541 38-16 Maint Approp Cost Maint App rop Cost 337,470 347,380 6,661,650 6,648,842 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT Table 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep 30, 19981 13. Elk City Lake, KS New Work Approp Cost 19,052,990 19,052,990 631,000 584, 500 622,800 627,936 612,379 597,575 425,000 15,003, 250 434,131 14,976,739 14. Fall River Lake, KS (Federal) (Contrib. Funds) 15. Fort Supply Lake, OK Maint Approp Cost Contrib. Cost 981,000 765,300 845,500 1,038,375 758,359 850,016 4,896 891,000 16,913,442 897,288 16,888,501 612 6108 6120 6120 New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 789,000 806,400 734,300 764,216 757,720 771,363 7,723,134 7,723,134 922,000 17,724,098 798,618 17,555,988 16. Fry Creeks, Bixby, OK (Contrib. Funds) 17. Great Bend, KS (Federal) (Contrib. Funds) 18. Great Salt Plains Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost 842,000 -441,000 2,837,000 2,413,000 136,987 166,296 2,385,420 2,917,165 275,000 140,854 365,000 141,209 -400,000 -732,000 -373,000 646,387 58,816 -335,263 178,254 371,147 8,019,568 7,886,412 640,000 282,063 - 19,968,400 50 19,968,073 - 4,259,254 - 4,259,254 - 4,626,270 - 4,626,270 Maint Approp Cost 19. Halstead, KS (Federal) New Work Approp Cost 303,000 280,800 298,000 285,870 290,215 302,592 -46,684 - 200,000 35,348 113,882 146,500 154,372 -100,000 7,214 38-17 Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 10,550,873 10,550,873 7,915,847 7,912,057 8,383,000 8,309,023 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Table 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep 80, 19981 Halstead, KS (Cont'd) (Contributed Funds) 20. Heyburn Lake and Polecat Creek, OK Contrib. Cost - 94,944 New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 21. Hugo Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost 709,000 682,400 730,300 748,671 711,519 643,679 - -4,800 568,000 13, 079,486 649,285 13,050,950 -80 41,211,562 - 41,211,562 1,362,000 1,552,800 1,444,600 1,359,618 29,303,680 1,339,108 1,633,828 1,452,729 1,338,389 29,220,503 22. Hulah Lake, OK - 11,388,150 - 11,388,150 Maint Approp Cost 210,000 287,200 351,700 268,215 299,951 350,942 682,000 11,429,612 366,808 11,094,511 Minor Rehabilitation Approp Cost 135,718 135,718 23. John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, KS New Work Approp Cost - 28,151,470 - 28,151,470 2,048,000 1,387,500 2,513,000 1,920,624 1,387,313 2,328,060 654,000 28,049,467 1,000,729 28,018,123 23. Kaw Lake, OK (Federal) (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Contrib. Cost - 109,430,750 876 - 109,430,750 1,685,000 1,829,900 1,778,100 1,705,000 34,180,775 1,635,730 1,823,545 1,812,806 1,730,601 34,143,019 -5,394 43,934 43,934 38-18 940,000 924,537 - 2,560,572 - 2,560,572 Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost TULSA, OK, DISTRICT Table 38-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep 30, 19981 25. Lake Kemp, TX - 7,637,702 - 7,637,702 145,000 176,800 140,100 116,038 192,262 161,347 26. Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, TX (Federal) (Contributed Funds) 27. Marion Reservoir, KS 28. McGrath Creek, Wichita Falls, TX (Federal) (Contributed Funds) 29. Mingo Creek, OK (Federal) (Contributed Funds) 30. Oologah Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Minor Rehabilitatic Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 1,894,000 850,000 4,030,735 1,086,914 - 575,000 476,659 575,000 227,260 - 33,844,000 16,510 33,783,939 7,835,000 7,835,000 - 13,420,818 - 13,420,818 1,033,000 2,720,400 2,372,000 1,953,000 22,982,555 1,009,661 2,641,500 2,438,030 1,903,431 22,876,092 49,600 24,924 68,924 44,000 68,924 1,429,000 157,840 3,393,000 3,391,000 117,896 677,449 3,945,215 3,548,168 Contrib. 187,500 250,000 2,315,000 Cost - 250,000 2,376,586 New Work Approp Cost 451,100 576,922 8,458,840 8,351,348 3,203,600 3,203,508 7,764,000 1,135,000 4,785,000 9,036,726 70,080,726 5,915,342 10,275,863 4,534,340 9,271,284 69,891,520 Contrib. 1,750,000 3,515,000 1,785,000 2,490,000 16,253,400 Cost 684,498 3,389,184 3,184,924 1,734,535 14,870,914 New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 37,029,928 s 37,029,928 s 1,564,000 1,560,400 1,543,000 1,485,000 29,004,360 1,554,425 1,496,720 1,596,187 1,519,158 28,993,869 38-19 New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 140,000 139,004 3,234,101 3,228,268 on REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Table 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep 80, 19981 31. Optima Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 32. Parker Lake, OK 33. Pat Mayse Lake, TX New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 195,000 123,600 169,839 139,603 -12,000 991 776,000 912,000 878,000 774,479 913,131 857,128 841,000 17,543,206 871,487 17,552,169 34. Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake, KS 893,000 860,600 929,800 911,799 874,573 911,511 869,000 13,592,228 856,954 13,553,986 35. Pine Creek Lake, OK Maint Approp Cost 36. Sardis Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 37. Skiatook Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 1,130,000 1,904,200 1,074,900 1,078,109 1,159,860 1,024,551 106,090 -100 894,000 1,054,000 1,000,100 833,195 1,067,305 1,023,550 -8,000 -300 1,165,000 2,096,800 1,230,900 1,304,943 1,968,658 1,270,191 857,000 19,439,787 913,376 19,422,596 -281,041 68,518,439 -105,740 68,518,429 800,000 12,473,221 856,598 12,445,411 -1,244 106,268,738 - 106,268,738 947,000 14,246,938 1,056,800 14,220,860 38-20 91,000 97,887 75,000 15,326 50,000 52,567 55,334 47,173,438 47,173, 438 7,434,649 7,432,225 585,326 580,660 9,310,661 9,310,661 Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 16,879,166 16,879,166 New Work Approp Cost 20,628,049 20,628,049 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT Table 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep 30, 19981 38. Toronto Lake, KS New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 39. Tulsa & West Tulsa, OK (Federal) (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp Cost 327,000 318,200 347,700 314,665 315,903 344,696 10,416 111,072 Contrib. Cost 17,749 679 Minor Rehabilitation Approp Cost 40. Waurika Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost - 39,000 - 36,764 - -8,700 -.- 1,118,111 1,110,444 -69 69,729,461 - 69,729,281 1,353,000 1,848,700 1,364,500 1,152,000 20,540,862 1,334,822 1,840,342 1,327,246 1,201,941 20,518,474 41. Winfield, KS (Contributed Funds) 42. Wister Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost 319,000 658,000 -86,000 2,378,000 409,416 355,547 248,869 2,330,421 Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost 65,000 -6,745 Maint Approp Cost 709,000 773,400 1,011,400 670,741 890,328 919,324 Major Rehabilitation Approp Cost 48. Broken Bow Lake, OK 501,500 14,594,024 604,693 14,552,963 - 11,131,529 - 11,131,529 - 41,222,692 - 41,222,692 New Work Approp Cost 38-21 13,896,324 13,896,324 8,071,116 8,052,892 1,425,000 957,243 400,000 132,616 398,000 402,765 10,644 75,000 31,937 Maint Approp Cost 4,279,617 4,165,833 65,000 10,690,751 10,687,439 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Table 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep 80, 19981 Broken Bow Lake, OK (Cont'd) 49. Eufaula Lake, OK (Contributed Funds) 50. Fort Gibson Lake, OK Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost 1,769,000 1,257,100 1,318,000 1,321,669 31,328,966 1,462,774 1,562,791 1,251,537 1,294,720 31,200,103 - -224,840 32,946 -29,117 - 123,795,907' - 123,795,907' 3,941,000 4,276,700 3,884,800 4,697,000 78,495,583 4,424,156 4,139,697 4,006,071 4,480,746 78,127,540 -76,449 41,223 254,780 254,180 43,821,4056 43,821,4056 (Contributed Funds) 51. Keystone Lake, OK Maint Approp Cost Contrib. Cost 3,325,000 4,084,300 3,436,000 3,273,000 65,672,612 3,352,223 4,007,568 3,486,300 3,203,442 65,448,079 501,000 487,164 New Work Approp Cost - 123,171,1736 - 123,171,1736 Maint Approp Cost 52. Lake Texoma (Denison Dam), OK and TX 53. Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Minor Rehabilitati Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 3,452,000 3,590,500 3,588,800 3,295,000 61,309,405 3,545,721 3,564,897 3,660,176 3,304,610 61,237,439 68,168,9607 68,168,9607 5,283,000 6,184,500 5,680,000 5,480,000 113,966,668 5,221,818 5,595,256 6,241,324 5,666,505 113,820,478 on 46,237 46,237 94,578,237 94,578,237 38-22 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT Table 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep 30, 19981 Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, OK (Cont'd) 54. Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 3,184,000 3,896,000 4,176,000 4,416,000 68,481,845 3,169,736 3,518,357 4,561,323 4,445,457 68,370,062 - 486,000 411,000 556,414 508,091 595,704 195,000 25,979,720a 239,836 25,963,5408 Maint Approp Cost 55. Webbers Falls Lock & Dam, OK 3,350,000 3,284,800 3,078,700 2,748,000 58,902,720 3,302,805 3,268,051 3,076,723 2,848,279 58,858,019 New Work Approp Cost 86,107,967 86,107,967 Maint Approp Cost 2,677,000 3,180,000 3,484,900 3,590,400 62,165,824 2,734,587 2,831,359 3,192,062 3,695,492 61,526,043 1. Includes $2,077,900 expended by the Jobs Act (P.L. 98-8 dated, March 24, 1983) for projects listed in Tables 29-M of the FY 85 Annual Report. 2. Includes $12,700,038 for Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification. 3. Excludes $81,460 contributed funds and $1,348,816 special funds. 4. Excludes $299,803 contributed funds and $13,211,728 special funds. 5. Excludes $134,919 contributed funds. Includes $49,581 Public Works acceleration funds; and $1,058,500 Hydropower. 6. Excludes $5,366,231 special funds. 7. Includes $433,549 Emergency Relief funds. Exchange $1,256,068 from special contributed funds. 8. Excludes $946 contributed funds. Includes $39,999 Public Works acceleration funds. 9. The cost for Grand Lake O' the Cherokees has been added to the amount reported in paragraph 45, Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations. 38-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 38-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Project Section Authorizing and Work In Text Act Authorized Documents 1. July 24, 1946 October 22, 1976 November 17, 1986 December 31, 1970 October 22, 1976 November 17, 1986 October 23, 1962 November 7, 1966 December 31, 1970 November 17, 1986 October 23, 1962 August 26, 1994 October 23, 1962 June 28, 1938 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 October 23, 1962 May 17, 1950 October 27, 1965 August 18, 1941 August 18, 1941 June 22, 1936 November 17, 1986 November 17, 1986 38-24 McCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM Big and Little Sallisaw Creeks Navigation Project W.D. Mayo Hydropwer ARCADIA LAKE Changed water quality to water supply ARKANSAS CITY ARKANSAS-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL Authorized Area V (Estelline Springs) Authorized Areas VII, VIII, and X Authorized Areas I, II-III, VI, IX, XIII, XIV, and XV Authorized the Red River Basin and the Arkansas River Basin as separate projects with separate authority. BIRCH LAKE BOWIE COUNTY LEVEE CANDY LAKE CANTON LAKE Approved Irrigation Storage Approved Water Supply Storage COPAN LAKE COUNCIL GROVE LAKE EL DORADO LAKE ELK CITY LAKE FALL RIVER LAKE FORT SUPPLY LAKE FRY CREEKS GREAT BEND 3. 4. 5. 5a. 5b. &5c. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. HD 79-758 PL 79-525 PL 94-587 PL 99-662 HD 91-299 PL 94-587 PL 99-662 SD 87-107 PL 89-789 SD 110 PL 91-611 PL 99-662 HD 87-563 PL 103-316 HD 87-564 HD 75-569 HD 87-563 HD 80-442 HD 89-232 HD 76-440 HD 76-440 HD 74-308 PL 99-662 PL 99-662 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT TABLE 38-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date of Project Section Authorizing and Work In Text Act Authorized Document. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. June 22, 1936 November 17, 1986 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 June 22, 1936 May 17, 1950 February 15, 1958 October 23, 1962 October 23, 1962 November 17, 1986 May 17, 1950 March 14, 1990 November 17, 1988 November 17, 1986 June 28, 1938 June 22, 1936 November 17, 1986 October 23, 1962 October 23, 1962 November 10, 1978 July 3, 1958 October 23, 1962 December 4, 1981 October 23, 1962 August 18, 1941 August 18, 1941 GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE HALSTEAD HEYBURN LAKE AND POLECAT CREEK HUGO LAKE HULAH LAKE JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR Authorized name change KAW LAKE LAKE KEMP LAKE WICHITA, HOLLIDAY CREEK MARION RESERVOIR Authorized name change MCGRATH CREEK WICHITA FALLS, TX MINGO CREEK OOLOGAH LAKE Co Cong OPTIMA LAKE PARKER LAKE PAT MAYSE LAKE PEARSON-SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE Authorized name change PINE CREEK LAKE SARDIS LAKE Authorized name change SKIATOOK LAKE TORONTO LAKE TULSA & WEST TULSA, OK 38-25 HD 74-308 PL 99-662 HD 80-290 HD 79-602 HD 74-308 HD 80-442 PL 85-327 HD 87-143 HD 87-144 PL 99-662 HD 80-442 PL 101-253 PL 100-676 PL 99-662 )mmittee Doc. No. 1, 75th :., 1st Session HD 74-308 PL 99-662 HD 88-71 HD 87-472 PL 95-265 HD 85-170 SD 87-145 PL 97-88 HD 87-563 HD 76-440 PL 77-228 PL 77-228 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 38-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date of Project Section Authorizing and Work In Text Act Authorized Documents December 30, 1963 October 27, 1965 June 28, 1938 July 30, 1983 WAURIKA LAKE WINFIELD WISTER LAKE Changed conservation pool elevation SD 88-33 PL 88-253 PL 89-298 Committee Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Session PL 98-63 July 3, 1958 October 23, 1962 July 24, 1946 July 16, 1984 November 17, 1986 August 18, 1941 July 24, 1946 November 17, 1986 May 17, 1950 June 28, 1938 October 17, 1940 Sepember 30, 1944 August 14, 1953 November 17, 1986 July 24, 1946 July 8, 1963 June 28, 1938 June 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 BROKEN BOW LAKE EUFAULA LAKE Authorized Piney Creek and Muddy Creek bridge replacement Authorized cost sharing FORT GIBSON LAKE Incorporated into the multiple-purpose plan for the Arkansas River Basin Added hydropower units 5 & 6 KEYSTONE LAKE LAKE TEXOMA (Denison Dam) Flood control and power Navigation and regulating flows Authorized name Water supply Recreation ROBERT S. KERR LOCK AND DAM AND RESERVOIR Authorized name change TENKILLER FERRY LAKE Power HD 85-170 SD 87-137 HD 79-758 PL 98-360 PL99-662 HD 76-107 PL 76-228 PL 99-662 SD 81-07 HD 75-541 PL 76-868 PL 78-454 PL 83-273 PL 99-662 HD 79-758 PL 88-62 40. 41. 42. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. Committee Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. HD 79-758 WEBBERS FALLS LOCK AND DAM HD 79-758 38-26 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT TABLE 38-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1998 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report for Construction Maintnenace Big and Little Sallisaw Inactive - - 3,163 Navigation Project Poteau River Navigation Project, Complete 1983 536,952 OK and AR Red River from Fulton, AR, Complete 1924 378,574 182,157 to Mouth of Washita River TABLE 38-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30. 1998 See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Augusta LPP, KS",2 1938 84,217 Big Pine Lake, TX8 1984 1,701,670 Boswell Lake, OK8 1952 - Cherry and Red Fork Creeks LPP, OK2 1970 261,448 Crutcho Creek LPP, OK8 1972 213,016 Dodge City LPP, KS2 Enid LPP, OK2 1963 743,612 14,599 Flat Rock and Valley View Creeks LPP, 1975 1,741,000 Tulsa, OK2, ' Florence LPP, KS2 1965 369,782 Hutchinson LPP, KS2 1956 3,497,718 Iola LPP, KS2 1939 22,290 Jenks LPP, OK2 1950 344,797 Joe Creek LPP, OK2 308,041 Lamed LPP, KS2 Lukfata Lake, OK8 1983 1,424,685 Marion, KS 1988 5,488,618 Oklahoma City LPP, OK2 1960 8,047,512 Red River Bank Stabilization Below Denison, 1953 222,105 OK and TX2 Red River Emergency Bank Protection - 397,499 Sand Creek LPP, KS2 1968 545,996 Sand Lake, OK8 1963 - Shidler Lake, OK 1983 568,191 Tulsa and West Tulsa LPP, OK 2 1954 3,592,432 Turtle Creek LPP, Yukon, OK8 1975 144,853 Tuskahoma Lake, OK8 1963 - West Branch Chisholm Creek LPP, KS2 1965 364,200 Wichita and Valley Center LPP, KS2 1960 12,247,379 LPP - Local Protection Project. 1. Completed by Kansas Works Progress Administration. 2. Complete. 3. Deferred. 4. Federal cost limited to $1,000,000. 5. Active with no current year expenditures. 38-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 38-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Day Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report for Authority Expended Expended Candy Lake, OK 1996 July 9, 1995 4,950,000 0 Cedar Point Lake, KS 1980 November 17,1986 0 0 Public Law 99-662 Cow Creek, Hutchinson, KS 1971 November 17, 1986 363,720 0 Public Law 99-662 El Dorado, West Branch, 1977 November 17, 1986 92,319 0 Walnut River, KS Public Law 99-662 Neodesha Lake, KS 1952 November 17, 1986 97,910 0 Public Law 99.662 Towanda Lake, KS 1981 November 17, 1986 393,361 0 Public Law 99-662 TABLE 38-H ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN MULTIPLE-PUPOSE PLAN (See Section 1 of Text) Feature River River Mile' Nearest Town LAKES Canton North Canadian 394.3 Canton, OK Elk City Elk River 8.7 Elk City, KS Eufaula Canadian 27.0 Eufaula, OK Fall River Fall River 54.2 Fall River, KS Fort Gibson Grand (Neosho) 7.7 Fort Gibson, OK Grand Lake O' the Cherokees Grand (Neosho) 77.0 Disney, OK Keystone Arkansas 538.8 Sand Springs, OK Lake Hudson (Markham Ferry) Grand (Neosho) 47.4 Locust Grove, OK Neodesha Verdigris 222.8 Neodesha, KS Oologah Verdigris 90.2 Oologah, OK Tenkiller Ferry Illinois 12.8 Gore, OK Toronto Verdigris 271.5 Toronto, KS Wister Poteau 60.9 Wister, OK McCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, OK (Tulsa District Portion) Bank Stabilization and Verdigris and N/A' Fort Smith, AR, Channel Rectification Arkansas to Catoosa, OK Chouteau Lock and Dam (17), OK Verdigris 401.5 Okay, OK Newt Graham Lock and Dam (18), OK Verdigris 421.6 Inola, OK Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam (15), OK Arkansas 339.0 Sallisaw, OK Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, OK Arkansas 336.2 Cowlington, OK Sans Bois Navigation Channel, OK Sans Bois Creek 341.0 Keota, OK W.D. Mayo Lock and Dam (14), OK Arkansas 319.6 Redland, OK Webbers Falls Lock and Dam (16), OK Arkansas 366.6 Gore, OK 1. On the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, these are navigation miles. 2. As required for a channel 9 feet deep. 38-28 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT TABLE 38-I INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 44 of Text) Projects Inspected in Fiscal Year Inspection Date Cherry/Red Fork Creeks, OK November 1997 Dodge City, KS October 1997 Enid Diviersion Channel, OK October 1997 Flat Rock/Valley View Creeks, OK November 1997 Florence, KS October 1997 Great Bend, KS October 1997 Haikey Creek, OK October 1997 Halstead, KS October 1997 Hutchinson, KS May 1998 Iola, KS December 1997 Holliday Creek, Wichita Falls, TX May 1998 Jenks, OK May 1998 Joe Creek, OK October 1997 Lamed, KS November 1997 Marion, KS November 1997 Mingo Creek, Audubon Creek, OK November 1997 North Canadian Waster Water Treatment Plant, OK April 1998 Oklahoma City Floodway, OK April 1998 Park City, KS April 1998 Sand Creek, City of Newton, KS November 1997 South Deer Creek, OK October 1997 Tulsa and West Tulsa Levees, OK November 1997 West Branch Chisholm Creek, KS April 1998 Wichita/Valley Center, KS April 1998 38-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 38-J FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 47 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Identification/Name Cost SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS NOT SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED BY CONGRESS - Section 205 Coordination 9,627 Bixby Creek, Bixby, OK 24,850 Lake Carl Blackwell, Stillwater, OK 34,344 Little Snake Creek, Bixby, OK 8,868 Sycamore Creek, Coffeyville, KS 143,294 Wichita Falls, TX, Plum Creek 174,177 Wolf Creek, Lawton, OK 143,854 TOTAL SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 539,014 EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION (Section 14) Section 14 Coordination 9,773 County Bridge, Arkansas River, Ralston, OK -521 County Bridge, Washita River, Garvin County, OK 5,936 Levee, Arkansas River, Tulsa, OK 1,206 Neosho River Bridge, Neosho County, KS 5,206 Slover Street, Shawnee, OK 6,872 Sewer Lines, Cottonwood River, Emporia, KS 2,114 Washita River, Caddo County Bridge, OK 8,392 Walnut River, Cowley County, KS 30 TOTAL EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION 39,008 PROJECT MODIFICATION TO IMPROVE ENVIRONMENT (Section 1185) Section 1135 Coordination 10,547 Initial General Appraisals 16,986 Arcadia, OK, Fish Habitat Restoration 65,120 El Dorado, KS, Fish Habitat Restoration 45,237 Sally Jones Lake, Vian, OK 31,484 Tenkiller Lake, OK, Tailwater Restoration 5,904 TOTAL MODICATION TO IMPROVE ENVIRONMENT 175,278 38-30 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT TABLE 38-K GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Sections 56 and 57 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Identification/Name Cost SURVEYS Flood Damage Prevention Studies Bird Creek Basin, OK 4,611 Special Studies Environmental Services Partnerships 36 Watershed/Ecosystem Reconnaissance Study Grand (Neosho) River, KS 4,051 Miscellaneous Activities Special Investigations 25,027 Review of FERC Licenses 1,034 Intragency Water Resources Development 10,997 North American Waterfowl Management Plan 1,572 Coordination with Other Federal Agencies, States, and Non-Federal Interests Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service (PL 83-566) Coop with Other Water Resource Development Agencies 6,903 Planning Assistance to States Cheroke Nation Dock 2,915 Oklahoma, McClellan Kerr Arkansas River 10,729 Oklahoma, Grand Lake Sewer Study 20,291 Oklahoma, Wister Lake Fetch Reduction 16,997 Oklahoma, Tenkiller Water Treatment 21,511 Oklahoma, Lake Wister Revegetation 8,382 TOTAL SURVEYS 80,825 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood Plain Management Services Flood Plain Management Services 122,712 Guides, Phamplets and Supporting Studies 8,010 NFPC 7,042 Quick Responses 10,753 SS-Avant, OK 16,899 SS-Bixby, OK FPP 74 SS-Del City, OK 23,662 SS-Haysville, KS 97 SS-Haysville, KS 55 SS-Midwest City, OK 12,254 SS-Riverine Flood Model 574 SS-Skiatook, OK 1,027 SS-Webbers Falls, OK 8,582 SS-Wichita, KS 32,688 Technical Services General 147,690 .TOTAL COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA 392,079 38-31 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT * District includes that portion of Texas south of Red River drainage basin exclusive of drainage basin of Rio Grande and its tributaries above and including Pecos River; exclusive of drainage basins to all short streams arising in coastal plain of Texas and flowing into the Gulf of Mexico, including entire basins of Buffalo Bayou, San Jacinto, San Bernard, Lavaca, Navidad, Mission, and Arkansas Rivers; exclusive of lower basins of major streams flowing into the gulf as follows: Sabine River, Texas and Louisiana, downstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas; Neches River downstream from Town Bluff gaging station; Trinity River downstream from Texas State Highway 45 crossing at Riverside, Texas; Brazos River downstream from confluence with Navasota River; Colorado River downstream from gaging station at Austin; Guadalupe River downstream from confluence with San Marcos River; San Antonio River downstream from confluence with Escondido Creek; Nueces River downstream from confluence with Frio and Atascosa Rivers; and exclusive ofAgua Dulce, San Fernando, and Olmos Creek basins draining into Baffin Bay; coastal area south thereof to Rio Grande and south to the northern boundaries of Newton, Jasper, Tyler, Polk, Trinity, Walker, Waller, Austin, Fayette, Gonzales, Karnes, Live Oak, Jim Hogg, Zapata; the northern and western boundaries of McMullan; and the western boundaries of Montgomery and Duval Counties, Texas. District also includes those portions of the Sulphur River and Cypress Creek Watershed located in the State of Texas; that portion of western Louisiana in Sabine River drainage basin upstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas. 39-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Trinity River Project, TX ............. 39-2 Flood Control 2. Aquilla Lake, TX................... 39-3 3. Bardwell Lake, TX .................. 39-3 4. Beals Creek, Big Spring, TX .......... 39-3 5. Belton Lake, TX .................... 39-4 6. Benbrook Lake, TX ................ 39-4 7. Canyon Lake, TX ................... 39-4 8. Ferrells Bridge Dam- Lake O' The Pines, TX .............. 39-5 9. Grapevine Lake, TX ................. 39-5 10. Hords Creek Lake, TX ............. 39-6 11. Jim Chapman Lake, TX.............. 39-6 12. Joe Pool Lake, TX .................. 39-6 13. LavonLake, TX ................... 39-7 14. Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement, TX ........... 39-7 15. Lewisville Dam, TX ................ 39-7 16. Navarro Mills Lake, TX .............. 39-8 17. O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake, TX....... 39-8 18. Proctor Lake, TX................... 39-8 19. Ray Roberts Lake, TX............... 39-8 20. San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX ........... 39-9 21. San Gabriel River, TX .............. 39-9 22. Somerville Lake, TX. ............... 39-10 23. Stillhouse Hollow Dam, TX.......... 39-10 24. Waco Lake, TX..................... 39-11 25. Waco Lake, TX (Dam Safety)......... 39-11 26. Wright Patman Dam and Lake, TX ... 39-11 27. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............. 39-12 Navigation 1. TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, TX The project authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (H. Doc 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.) consists of five major components: Multiple-Purpose Channel, Tennessee Colony Lake, Dallas Floodway Extension, West Fork Floodway, and Water Conveyance Facilities. For the last full report on the project as authorized, see Annual Report of 1978. The project information present herein is based on the tentatively selected project plan presented in the Draft General Design Memorandum. The plan consists of three structural components: Dallas Floodway Extension, Tennessee Colony Lake, and Channel to Liberty in the lower basin. Operations during fiscal year. Channel to Liberty and Tennessee Colony Lake have been Flood Control (Cont) Page 28. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations....................... 39-12 29. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............. 39-12 30. Work Under Special Authorization ... 39-12 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 31. Robert Douglas Willis Hydropower, TX .................. 39-12 32. Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, TX..................... 39-13 33. Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, TX (Dam Safety) .................. 39-13 34. Town Bluff Dam- B.A. Steinhagen Lake, TX ........... 39-13 35. Whitney Lake, TX................. 39-13 General Investigations 36. Surveys ....................... 39-14 37. Preconstruction Engineering and Design........................ 39-14 38. Collection and Study of Basic Data ... 39-14 Tables Table 30-A Table 30-B Table 30-C Table 30-D Table 30-E Cost and Financial Statement ................. 39-15 Authorizing Legislation ..... 39-19 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects....... 39-23 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects....... 39-24 Work Under Special Authorization.............. 39-25 dormant for several years due to lack of local support. The Dallas Floodway Extension has advanced to the Preconstruction Engineering and Design stage and is described in Preconstruction Engineering and Design section. CHANNEL TO LIBERTY: Location. The Channel to Liberty begins at the Houston Ship Channel, crosses the bay area in an easterly direction to intersect the existing Double Bayou Channel turns northward along the coastline to Wallisville Lake and then continues northward through the lake area along the course of the Trinity River to River Mile 45 above Liberty, Texas. Existing project. See Galveston,Texas District Annual Report writeup for existing project. 39-2 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT Proposed project. The navigation portion of the channel will have a width of 200 feet with a depth of 12 feet and will extend from the Houston Ship Channel in Galveston Bay to the port of Liberty, Texas. The flood control portion of the channel will have a bottom width of 200 feet with a depth of 30 feet, and will extend from Wallisville Lake to River Mile 45 above Liberty, Texas. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to: (a) provide, without cost to the Federal Government, all lands, easements and rights-of-way required for construction, operation and maintenance of the project, (b) accomplish, without cost to the Federal Government, all relocations and alterations to existing improvements, other than highway bridges over new land cuts and railroad bridges required for the construction of the project, (c) maintain and operate the flood control portion of the channel upstream of Liberty, Texas, and (d) reimburse the Federal Government for one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. TENNESSEE COLONY LAKE: Location. The Tennessee Colony dam site is located at River Mile 341.7 on the Trinity River about 22 miles west of Palestine, Texas. The lake would extend into Freestone, Anderson, Henderson, and Navarro Counties, and would control a drainage area of 12,302 square miles. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for the construction of an earthfilled dam with a maximum height of 123 feet above the streambed and a total embankment length of 42,350 feet with a gated concrete spillway. The lake will have a total controlled storage of 3,455,000 acre-feet and a water surface area of 114,400 acres at the top of the flood control pool and 68,100 acres at the top of the conservation pool. The total storage includes 2,269,500 acre-feet for flood control, 1,040,000 acre-feet for conservation, and 145,500 acrefeet for sediment reserve. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage and one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. Flood Control 2. AQUILLA LAKE, TX Location. On Aquilla Creek in Hill County, Texas, with the dam at River Mile 23.3, about 6.8 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas, and about 24.0 miles north of Waco, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing Acts see Annual Report for 1984. Construction was started March 1977, and project was ready for beneficial use April 29, 1983. Estimated cost is $46,100,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. A contract with the Brazos River Authority for water supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army, June 29,1976. To date, the Authority has paid $940,734 toward principal and $98,633 to operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continue. Benefits accrued to Aquilla Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1998 were $18,928,100. 3. BARDWELL LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Waxahachie Creek, 5 river miles upstream from its confluence with Chambers Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, and about 5 miles south of Ennis, Ellis County, Texas. Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction of project was started August 1963 and completed for beneficial use in November 1965. Estimated cost of project is $12,941,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to increased water supply storage under the terms of the Water Supply Act of 1958. A contract was approved by the Secretary of the Army on June 24, 1963, and the Trinity River Authority, a State agency, agreed to fulfill all requirements of local cooperation. To date the authority has paid $1,497,148 toward principal and $1,939,954 toward annual cost of operation and maintenance of project, including cost of operating 10-foot conduit. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Bardwell Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1998 were $12,128,400. 4. BEALS CREEK, BIG SPRING, TX Location. Beals Creek, Big Spring, Texas is located in the city of Big Spring, Howard County, Texas on Beals Creek, a tributary of the Colorado River. Existing project. The Beals Creek Flood Control Project consists of construction of a channel to the north of and within a portion of the existing 39-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Beals Creek channel. The channel extends approximately 7,200 feet from a point south of Channing Street at Onemile Lake and ends at the Benton Street Bridge. The channel is a trapezoidal grass-lined channel with an average depth of 11 feet, a bottom width of 20 feet, and side slopes of 1 vertical to 3 horizontal. A grade control structure will be constructed at the upper limit of the project at Onemile Lake to allow the proper drainage gradient while preserving the existing wetland environment in the Onemile Lake area. Estimated Federal cost (Oct. 1, 1997, base price) is $8,420,300; non-Federal cost for real estate, relocation of utilities and disposal is $3,424,500. Project was completed in December 1998. Local cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement with the city of Big Spring was signed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army (CW) on March 10, 1994. Operations during fiscal year. The city has purchased the lands, easements and rights-ofway. A relocation contract was signed with the Union Pacific Railroad in May 1994 for the relocation of a spur bridge. The channel contract was awarded May 1996 and is 100 percent complete. 5. BELTON LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Leon River about 16.7 miles above confluence of Leon and Lampasas Rivers and about 3 miles north of Belton, Texas. Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report of 1962. Construction started June 1949 and project was ready for beneficial use in March 1954. Raising water supply pool: Construction started in July 1970 and the pool raise is complete. Estimated cost of project is $18,410,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for remaining water supply storage in reservoir was approved by Secretary of the Army on January 15, 1958, at an estimated cost of $5,125,003. To date $1,776,300 has been paid. Under the contract Brazos River Authority must also pay annually 11.2 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date $2,937,344 has been paid. An interim contract with Brazos River Authority for emergency use of water supply storage in project was approved by Secretary of the Army on January 2,1957. Amount of $433,083 paid by authority on March 21,1957 for use of these facilities was credited to interest and principal payable under formal water supply contract. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Belton Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1998 were $137,622,700. 6. BENBROOK LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Tarrant County, Texas, on Clear Fork of Trinity River 15 river miles upstream from its confluence with West Fork of Trinity River about 10 miles southwest of downtown Fort Worth, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started May 1947 and ready for beneficial use in September 1952. Estimated cost of project is $14,544,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. No water supply storage is included in project. In 1956, Congress passed legislation enabling the city of Fort Worth to purchase conservation storage space in Benbrook Lake. Contracts have been negotiated with the city of Fort Worth and the Benbrook Water and Sewer Authority for the use of portions of the navigation storage for water supply purposes until such storage is required for Trinity River Navigation. To date, $560,205 has been paid by the city of Fort Worth and $166,200 by Benbrook Water and Sewer Authority. A cost sharing contract with the city of Benbrook for Recreation Development was approved by the Secretary of the Army May 20, 1977. To date, $21,945 has been paid. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to system consisting of Benbrook Lake, Clear Fork and West Fork Floodways: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1998 are estimated at $2,990,206,800. 7. CANYON LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Guadalupe Rive; 303 miles above its mouth, and about 12 miles northwest of New Braunfels, Comal County, Texas. Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction started April 1958 and project completed for beneficial use June 1964. Estimated cost of project is $21,732,000, including $1,400,000 contributed by local interests. Hydropower: The Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority (GBRA) was licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to construct a 6,070 kilowatt plant which is located adjacent to the existing outlet channel. The project operates utilizing conservation releases, i.e., no change from the present operating regiment is anticipated. 39-4 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT GBRA has an agreement with the Pedernales Electric Cooperative for sale of power. Construction of the hydropower was completed in 1989 with non-Federal funds. Iocal cooperation. Local interests (Guadalupe- Blanco River Authority) will utilize water impounded for water supply and streamflow regulation for development of electric power. In a formal contract approved by Chief of Engineers on October 24, 1957, Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority agreed to fulfill all requirements of local cooperation. Required contribution of $1,400,000 was made in full by Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority. The estimated cost of the water storage contract is about $9,000,000. To date, $3,034,704 has been paid. In addition, $22,848 was contributed for installation and operation of reservoir leakage gages. Under the contract the authority must pay 34.8 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date, $2,157,869 has been paid. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Canyon Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1998 were $165,135,500. 8. FERRELLS BRIDGE DAM.. LAKE O' THE PINES, TX Location. Dam is on Cypress Creek in Marion, Harrison, Upshur, Morris, Camp, and Titus Counties, Texas, 8 miles west of Jefferson, Texas. Existing project. An earthfill dam 10,600 feet long and 77 feet high includes a 200-foot spillway with a capacity of 68,200 cubic feet per second. Reservoir controls runoff from 850 square miles of drainage area, and has a gross storage capacity of 842,100 acre-feet including 587,200 acre-feet flood control storage, 3,800 acre-feet conservation storage, and 251,000 acre-feet for municipal and industrial water supply. Reservoir extends 28 miles upstream. Project affords substantial flood protection of Cypress Creek Valley from damsite to confluence with Red River and, together with operation of other reservoirs proposed in Red River Basin, will provide flood protection along main stem of Red River below Denison Dam. Construction commenced in January 1955 and was completed June 1960. Estimated Federal cost of project is $17,231,700, including $4,349,200 for Code 711 and $399,739 accelerated Public Works fund. This project transferred to the Fort Worth District as of the end of FY 1979. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O' The Pines project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1998 were $12,819,200. 9. GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Tarrant County, Texas, on Denton Creek, 11.7 river miles upstream from its confluence with Elm Fork of Trinity River and about 20 miles northwest of city of Dallas, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started December 1947 and ready for beneficial use in July 1952. Estimated cost of project is $18,896,000, including $2,040,000 contributed by local interests. A contract for modification of Embankment and Spillway was awarded September 30, 1983 and completed Fiscal Year 1990. The improvements provided for spillway modification by construction of spillway chute and stilling basin and a berm on the downstream side of the main embankment. Local cooperation. A contract with Dallas County Park Cities Water Control and Improvement District No. 2 for 50,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on March 21, 1955. Park Cities paid the required $607,000. A contract with city of Dallas for 85,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on March 17, 1954. Dallas paid the required $1,433,026. A contract with city of Grapevine, Texas, for 1,250 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on September 14, 1953, at an estimated cost of $22,654. A contract for Interim Use of Navigation Storage with city of Grapevine was approved by Secretary of the Army on February 27, 1981, at an estimated cost of $684,000, has been paid in full. Above contracts include payment of operation and maintenance costs as follows: Dallas County Park Cities Water Control and Improvement District No. 2, a pro rata part of the actual annual cost, which part is to be not less than $2,000 nor more than $3,000; Dallas, 9.2 percent of actual annual cost; and Grapevine, its pro rata part of actual annual cost (estimated at $79.55 annually and included in total annual payment). Following operation and maintenance payments have been made: Park Cities, $136,231; Dallas, $760,750; and Grapevine, $323,534. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continue. Benefits accrued to system comprised of Grapevine Lake and Dallas Floodway: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1998 were $4,309,795,100. 39-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 10. HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX Location. On Hords Creek, a tributary of Pecan Bayou, about 13.5 miles west of Coleman,Texas, and about 27.8 miles upstream from mouth of Hords Creek. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started January 1947 and completed for beneficial use in April 1948. Estimated cost of project is $4,337,000 including $105,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Hords Creek project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1998 were $937,030. 11. JIM CHAPMAN LAKE, TX Location. Jim Chapman Lake is located in northeast Texas about 4 miles southeast of Cooper, 13.0 miles north of Sulphur Springs, and is at river mile 23.3 on the South Sulphur River The South Sulphur River rises in Fannin County, Texas, and flows generally east for about 80 miles to its confluence with the North Sulphur River to form the Sulphur River. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts, see Annual Report for 1997. Construction of project was started in July 1958 and completed for beneficial use in May 1994. Estimated cost of project is $143,000,000, including $227,000 non-Federal cost for land for the levees. Local cooperation. Local interests (North Texas Municipal Water District, Sulphur River Municipal Water District, city of Irving) will utilize water impounded for present and future water supply. The total cost allocated to water supply to be reimbursed is $54,600,000. North Texas Municipal Water District, NTMWD, has contracted for 36.859 percent of the water supply storage for future use with deferred payments for ten years. Under the contract NTMWD must pay 13.803 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. Sulphur River Municipal Water District, SRMWD, has contracted for 6.5 percent of the water supply storage for initial use and 19.78 percent for future use for a total of 26.282 percent of the water supply storage. To date, $198,479 has been paid. Under the contract, SRMWD must pay 2.435 percent of actual annual operation and maintenance. To date, $52,164 has been paid. The city of Irving has contracted for 16.923 percent of the water supply storage for initial use and 19.936 for future use for a total of 36.859 of the water supply storage. To date, $521,771 has been paid. Under the contract Irving must pay 6.337 percent of actual annual operation and maintenance. To date $155,052 has been paid. The Texas Parks and Wildlife Department and the Corps of Engineers have entered into or have agreed to formal Operation and Maintenance contracts for recreation facilities and wildlife conservation and management. Under the contracts for recreation facilities dated 7 November 1988 and 11 September 1990, Texas Parks and Wildlife will be responsible for 100 percent of the operations and maintenance of two state parks that are being constructed with Federal funds. Under the contracts for wildlife conservation and management the state will be responsible for 24.14 percent of the operations, maintenance and replacement annual costs for areas totaling approximately 35,500 acres. The remaining balance will be the responsibility of the Project Sponsors and the Government. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. The Energy and Water Development Act PL 104-206 of 1997 changed the name of Cooper Lake and Channels, TX to Jim Chapman Lake Cooper Dam, TX. Benefits accrued to Jim Chapman Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1998 are estimated at $4,838,300. 12. JOE POOL LAKE, TX Location. Dam is located at River Mile 11.2 on Mountain Creek, a right bank tributary of the West Fork of the Trinity River, and is adjacent to the city limits of Grand Prairie, Dallas County, Texas, which is one of the rapid growing cities in the Dallas-Fort Worth Metropolitan area. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1996. Construction of project was started in 1975 and completed for beneficial use in September 1994. Estimated cost of project is $215,540,000 including $11,350,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 apply. Contracts for water supply storage and recreation with the Trinity River Authority were approved by the Acting Secretary of the Army, June 15,1977. The recreation contract with Trinity Valley Authority was modified March 28,1979, to allow the Corps to participate with the State of Texas and approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army March 21,1980. Recreation development contract with the State of Texas was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army March 21, 1980. Reimbursement is currently estimated at $57,240,000 for water supply and $19,840,000 for recreation (excluding future recreation facilities) for a total of $76,790,000 39-6 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT exclusive of interest. To date $1,476,917 has been paid. Of the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance, $41,202 has been paid. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Public Law 97-400, H.R. 7377, 97th Congress, effective December 31, 1982, changed the name of Lakeview Lake to Joe Pool Lake. Benefits accrued to Joe Pool Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1998 were $755,888,900. 13. LAVON LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Collin County, Texas, on East Fork of Trinity River 55.9 miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started January 1948 and ready for beneficial use in September 1953. Project is complete. See following section for Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement authorized by Flood Control Act of 1962. Estimated cost of project is $15,470,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with North Texas Municipal Water District for water supply storage, including cost of intake structure, was approved by Secretary of the Army July 8, 1954, at an estimated cost of $1,405,753. Contract was revised in 1973 and final revised contract amount is $1,445,262. To date North Texas Municipal Water District has paid $4,956,357. Under the contract North Texas Municipal Water District must pay annually 13.6 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance, and to date has paid $1,060,326. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Lavon Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1998 were $202,867,600. 14. LAVON LAKE MODIFICATION AND EAST FORK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Location. Existing dam isi n CTllin CountyT, ras, on East Fork of Trinity River, 55.9 miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22.0 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. Channel improvement of East Fork extends from its mouth to River Miles 31.8. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1988. Construction of project was initiated in May 1970 and ready for beneficial use in December 1975. Estimated Federal cost of the modification and improvement is $69,750,000 and $220,000 local interests, a total of $69,970,000. Project is complete. Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to increased water supply storage under the terms of the Water Supply Act of 1958. The North Texas Municipal Water District has contracted for 43 percent of the water supply (approved September 22, 1967, by the Secretary of the Army) and to date $985,433 has been paid. North Texas Municipal Water Supply District has submitted assurance to contract for 57 percent of future water supply. Reimbursement is currently estimated at $37,825,004. Levee Districts 4 and 5, which comprise the lower 10 miles of the East Fork Channel, entered into agreements as required by Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 on January 28, 1972 and have furnished all necessary construction easements. Levee Districts 6, 8, 10, 13, and 15, which comprise the upper 15 miles of the East Fork Channel, have declined to provide the necessary assurances. On December 8, 1972, this portion of the project was reclassified from "active" to "inactive" category. Operations during fiscal year. Improvement of the lower ten miles of the East Fork Channel and Levees and total project are 100 percent complete. 15. LEWISVILLE DAM, TX Location. Dam is in Denton County, Texas, on Elm Fork of Trinity River 30 river miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22 miles northwest of city of Dallas, Texas at a site downstream from old Garza Dam. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started November 1948 and ready for beneficial use in November 1954. Estimated cost of project is $25,902,000, including $3,677,000 contributed by local interests. Hydropower: The city of Denton, Texas (COD) was licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to construct a 2,000 kilowatt plant which is located adjacent to the existing outlet channel. The project operates utilizing conservation releases, i.e., no change from the present operating regiment is anticipated. COD Utilities Department utilizes this power for its local customers. Construction of the hydropower was completed in 1991 with non- Federal funds. Local cooperation. A contract with city of Dallas for 415,000 acre-feet of water supply storage 39-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 land rights and interests to Garza Dam and Reservoir was approved by the Secretary of the Army on July 16, 1953. Local contributions have been made in full. A contract with city of Denton, Texas, for remaining 21,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army on May 20, 1954, with an estimated cost of $250,064. Local contributions have been paid in full. Under above contracts, cities of Dallas and Denison must pay annually 21.9 and 1 percent, respectively, of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date Dallas has paid $4,515,753 and Denton $194,597. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to system comprised of Lewisville Lake; this includes Ray Roberts Lake and Dallas Floodway Systems. Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1998 were $17,047,961,600. 16. NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Navarro County, Texas, at River Mile 63.9 on Richland Creek, a tributary of Trinity River, about 16.0 miles southwest of Corsicana, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorization acts see Annual Report for 1965. Construction started December 1959 and project completed for beneficial use March 1963. Estimated cost of project $13,154,000 including $300,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended applies. A formal contract with the Trinity River Authority was approved March 3, 1966, by the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost of $2,260,800. To date the Authority has paid $1,346,573 for water supply and $1,502,923 for operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Navarro Mills Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1998 were $42,875,200. 17. O.C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on North Concho River, a tributary of Concho River, about 6.6 miles above mouth of North Concho River near city of San Angelo, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Name was changed from San Angelo Dam and Reservoir to O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake January 3, 1975 by Public Law 93-634. Construction of project was started May 1947 and ready for beneficial use February 1952. Estimated cost of project is $17,111,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A water supply contract with Upper Colorado River Authority for water supply storage in reservoir was approved by Secretary of the Army on October 11, 1948. The Authority has contributed $860,444 toward cost of project and $64,336 toward operation and maintenance for a 50- year period. The Authority must pay additional contributions of $1 a year for useful life of project, beginning January 1, 1965. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1998 were $2,376,000. 18. PROCTOR LAKE, TX Location. Dam is at River Mile 238.9 on Leon River, a tributary of Brazos River, about 8.0 miles northeast of Comanche in Comanche County, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorization act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction of project was started July 1960 and completed for beneficial use 1963. Estimated cost of project is $16,249,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 applies.A formal contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, was approved by Secretary of the Army, July 1, 1960, and was modified and approved May 9, 1966, at an estimated cost of $1,707,900. To date the Authority has paid $568,399 for water supply and $622,669 for operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance were continued. Benefits accrued to Proctor Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1998 were $38,777,500. 19. RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX Location. Damsite is located at River Mile 60.0 on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River, Denton County, between Sanger and Aubrey, Texas and 30 miles upstream from Lewisville Dam. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for construction of an earthfilled dam with a maximum height of 141 feet above the streambed, a length of 15,250 feet including an uncontrolled broadcrested spillway 100 feet long, controlling 682 square miles of drainage area. The lake will have a total controlled storage of 1,064,600 acre-feet, with a water surface area of 36,900 acres. The total storage includes 260,800 acre-feet for 39-8 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT flood control, 749,200 acre-feet for water supply, and 54,600 acre-feet for sediment reserve. The Water Resources Development Act of 1990 authorized the Greenbelt Corridor between Lewisville and Ray Roberts Lakes. Estimated Federal cost of the project is $317,300,000 (Oct. 1, 1995 base price). Public Law 96-384, 96th Congress, H.R. 8094, effective January 4, 1981, changed the name of Aubrey Lake to Ray Roberts Lake. Hydropower: At the request of the city of Denton and the approval of the Secretary of the Army, the penstock was added to the embankment as a minimum facility for future hydropower. The city of Denton, Texas (COD) was licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to construct a 1,000 kilowatt plant which is located adjacent to the existing outlet channel. The project operates utilizing conservation releases, i.e., no change from the present operating regiment is anticipated. COD Utilities Department utilizes this power for its local customers. Construction of the hydropower was completed in 1991 with non-Federal funds. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 as amended and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Contracts with the cities of Dallas and Denton, Texas, for water supply storage and recreation were approved by the Secretary of the Army September 16, 1980. To date the city of Dallas has paid $7,712,213. The city of Denton has paid in full their share of the water supply storage. Dallas has paid $457,095 and Denton has paid $160,596 toward annual cost of operation and maintenance of project. Operations during fiscal year. The project is about 99 percent complete overall. Through FY 1998 100 percent of the land acquisition, the road and utility relocations and the embankment, spillway and outlet works have been completed. Major work item remaining to be completed is recreational facilities for the Greenbelt. Deliberate Impoundment began 30 June 1987 at Ray Roberts Lake, the pool raise at Lewisville Lake was 30 November 1988. The project is scheduled to be completed in April 1999. Benefits accrued to Ray Roberts Lake project: Accumulated flood damage prevented is shown in with Lewisville Dam, TX. 20. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Location. Floodway is in city of San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas, on San Antonio River and San Pedro, Apache, Alazan, Martinez, and Six Mile Creeks. Existing project. The project consists of 30.7 miles of channel and associated improvements on six separate streams. Completion of detailed engineering and design studies revealed that the least costly alternative for the remaining channel improvements would consist of two tunnels 120 feet below the surface each having an inside diameter of 24 feet and vertical intake, outlet and access shafts. The San Pedro Creek tunnel is 6,040 feet in length and the San Antonio River tunnel is 16,360 feet in length. Estimated Federal cost of these modifications is $153,100,000 (Oct. 1, 1998, base price), and estimated cost to local interests is $65,900,000 which includes $4,050,000 cash contributions and $61,850,000 for lands, damages, and construction, a total of $218,500,000. The existing project was authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act. The Water Resources Act of 1976 added authorization to the existing project for construction of flood control measures needed to preserve and protect the Espada Aqueduct located in the vicinity of Six Mile Creek. Construction was started in October 1957. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction, including purchase and removal of buildings, relocation or reconstruction of bridges (exclusive of railway bridges), channel dams where applicable, and utility lines; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate all works after completion; and provide a cash contribution for enhancement benefits of 2.65 percent of actual Federal construction cost. San Antonio River Authority furnished assurances that it will comply with all requirements of local cooperation. These assurances were accepted by the District Engineer on April 15, 1957. To date $4,001,268 has been contributed by San Antonio River Authority. In addition, $30,000 has been contributed and accepted, under the authority of Civil Functions Appropriations Act of 1958, for vehicular crossings over the San Antonio Channel. Operations during fiscal year. During FY 1998 funds were used to continue construction and engineering and design studies. The project is about 99 percent complete overall and is scheduled to be completed in September 2001. Benefits accrued to San Antonio project: Accumulated damages prevented through FY 1998 were $439,000,000. 21. SAN GABRIEL RIVER, TX Location. Project is a system of three reservoirs in Williamson County in the central portion of Brazos River Basin, which consists of Granger Dam at River Mile 31.9 on San Gabriel River, about 7.0 miles east of Granger, Texas; North San Gabriel Dam at River Mile 4.3 on North Fork of San Gabriel River, about 3.5 miles northwest of Georgetown, Texas; and South Fork Dam at River 39-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Mile 4.7 on South Fork of San Gabriel River, about 3.0 miles southwest of Georgetown, Texas. Existing project. Granger Lake was authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act, and North (North San Gabriel Dam and Lake Georgetown) and South Fork Lakes were authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Estimated total Federal cost of project is $181,400,000 (Oct. 1, 1986, base price) and estimated non-Federal cost of $90,600,000 for a project total of $272,000,000. Plan of improvement provides for the following: Granger: An earthfilled dam 16,320 feet long, including spillway with maximum height of 115 feet above streambed, which controls 709 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 244,200 acre-feet, of which 162,200 acre-feet are for flood control, 37,900 acrefeet for water supply storage, and 44,100 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of project is $62,062,000. North San Gabriel Dam: A rockfill dam 6,700 feet long, including spillway with maximum height of 164 feet above streambed, which controls 246 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 130,800 acre-feet of which 87,600 acre-feet are for flood control, 29,200 acre-feet for water supply storage, and 14,000 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of project is $38,765,000. South Fork: A rockfill dam 5,620 feet long, including spillway with maximum height of 152 feet above streambed, which controls 123 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 82,600 acre-feet (45,700 for flood control, 28,900 for water supply storage, and 8,000 for sediment reserve). Estimated cost of project is $171,173,000. Public Law 96-575, 96th Congress, H.R. 4941 effective January 4, 1981, changed the name of North Fork Lake to North San Gabriel Dam and Lake Georgetown. Local cooperation. Construction is subject to condition that local interests reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply at Granger, Lake Georgetown, and South Fork Lakes. Reimbursement currently estimated at $13,315,000 for Granger, $6,295,000 for Lake Georgetown, and $50,563,000 for South Fork, for a total of $70,172,000 exclusive of interest. Brazos River Authority, a State agency, is the local interests' sponsor of project, and by letter dated April 18,1966, indicated its acceptance of the proposed plan of development and its willingness to pay for the costs allocated to water supply in each reservoir in the ultimate plan. Such water supply assurances for Granger and Lake Georgetown Lakes were approved May 24, 1968 as satisfactory in accordance with requirements of the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended. Contract negotiations for South Fork Lake will be deferred until the need for water supply develops and the reservoir is scheduled for construction. Operations during fiscal year. Through 1983 all work has been completed. Deliberate impoundment of water commenced at Granger and Lake Georgetown Lakes on January 21, 1980 and March 3, 1980, respectively. In FY 1982, studies on South Fork Lake were resumed in preparation of General Design Memorandum to provide reaffirmation prior to construction. A Draft Reevaluation Report on South Fork Lake was submitted to headquarters in October 1986. The report recommended no Federal action and defer further studies indefinitely. Future water supply needs of the area would be addressed by reallocating storage at Granger Lake. The South Fork Lake project would be eligible for deauthorization in FY 2000 if no funds are obligated by then. Benefits accrued to project consisting of Granger and Lake Georgetown: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1998 were $36,701,700. 22. SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Yegua Creek 20 miles upstream from its confluence with Brazos River and about 2 miles south of Somerville, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction started in June 1962 and the project was ready for beneficial use in January 1967. Estimated cost of project is $30,227,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage approved May 10, 1962, by the Secretary of the Army, has paid $2,328,646 to date. Also under the contract, the Authority must pay annually 28.655 percent of the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Somerville Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1998 were $65,822,500. 23. STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX Location. Dam is on Lampasas River 16 miles upstream from its confluence with Little River, a tributary of the Brazos River, and about 5 miles southwest of Belton, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction was initiated in July 1962 and the project was ready for beneficial use in February 1968. Estimated cost of project is $23,670,000. 39-10 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage was approved April 13,1962, by the Secretary of the Army, at an estimated cost of $6,912,430. To date the Authority has paid $2,966,635. Also under the contract the Authority must pay annually 27.748 percent of the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the Authority has paid $1,542,573. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Stillhouse Hollow Dam Project: Accumulated estimate of flood damages prevented through FY 1998 is $34,076,600. 24. WACO LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Bosque River, 4.6 river miles above its confluence with Brazos River, at city of Waco, McLennan County, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Estimated cost of project is $50,853,000 including $250,000 contributed by local interests and $2,500,000 other non-Federal cost. Construction was started in July 1958, and project was ready for beneficial use in February 1965. Local cooperation. Section G of the Flood Control Act of December 1944 applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage and the contract with the city of Waco transferring the existing Lake Waco to the Government for their water storage, was approved by the Secretary of the Army on April 15, 1958. To date, the Authority for their portion of the water supply storage has paid $2,891,286. Also under the contract the Authority and the city must pay 14.706 and 2.087 percent respectively of the actual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the Authority has paid $1,374,704 and the city has paid $208,684. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, for additional storage for municipal and industrial water supply, was approved by the Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army, September 28, 1984. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Waco Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1998 were $117,580,400. 25. WACO LAKE, TX (DAM SAFETY) Location. For location of completed dam see Waco Lake, Texas in this chapter. Existing project. The existing rolled earthfill embankment's top elevation of 510 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD), is hydrologically deficient. The original hydrologic design criteria used for Waco Dam design has been revised. Current hydrologic design criteria indicates the spillway and outlet works cannot pass the Probable Maximum Flood (PMF) without overtopping the dam by 1.0 foot, which could lead to failure of the embankment and catastrophic release of the reservoir. Adding required freeboard, Waco Dam crest height is hydrologically deficient by 4.6 feet. The proposed modification consists of raising the dam crest approximately by 4.6 feet to 514.6 feet NGVD utilizing a combination of compacted earthfill and reinforced cast-in-place concrete parapet wall for the full length of the dam. No major modification to the spillway, spillway service bridge, outlet works tower, or outlet works tower service bridge will be required. However, the spillway hoist mechanisms for the tainter gates will be waterproofed. The outlet works service bridge will be provided with a removeable bulkhead to be installed only during large flood events but would otherwise remain unchanged Estimated Federal cost for raising the dam modification is $6,480,000 (Oct. 1, 1997, base price) and $220,000 is to be reimbursed by local sponsors. Operations during fiscal year. During FY 1998 funds were used to complete plans and specifications in February 1998 and project construction scheduled to be completed September 2000. 26. WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Sulphur River in Cass and Bowie Counties, Texas. Dam is 45 miles above mouth of Sulphur River, and about 8 miles southwest of Texarkana, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1984. Estimated cost of project is $51,945,000 which includes $5,449,100 Code 711, $399,939 accelerated public works funds, and $13,138,004 to be reimbursed by local interests, over a period not to exceed 50 years, for water supply storage, and including $2,092,040 for pro rata share of original reservoir cost. Construction was initiated in August 1948 and completed in March 1962, except real estate activities, construction under Code 711, and conversion of 120,000 acre-feet to water supply storage after completion of Cooper Reservoir (Jim Chapman Lake). This project transferred to the Fort Worth District as of the end of FY 1979. Local cooperation. A contract with the city of Texarkana, Texas, for reserving water supply storage space was approved by the Secretary of the Army December 17, 1968. To date, the city has paid $780,765. 39-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Wright Patman Dam and Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1998 were $13,859,000. 27. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed local flood protection projects is made periodically in compliance with Section 208.10, of Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, which contains regulations for operation and maintenance of local flood-protection works approved by the Secretary of the Army in accordance with authority in Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936. See Table 30-D for inspections made this fiscal year. Inspection costs for FY 1998 from regular funds for maintenance were $106,374. Total costs to September 30, 1998 were $1,422,779. 28. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with Flood Control Act of 1944, expenditures were made for scheduling flood control reservoir operations and preparation of reservoir regulation manual for Marshall Ford Dam, on the Colorado River, near city of Austin, Texas, and for preparation of reservoir regulation manual for Twin Buttes Dam, on Middle and South Concho Rivers near city of San Angelo, Texas. Marshall Ford Dam was authorized by 1937 River and Harbor Act. Project was constructed jointly by Bureau of Reclamation and Lower Colorado River Authority and was completed during FY 1942. Twin Buttes Reservoir was authorized for construction by Department of Interior by Public Law 152, 85th Congress. Construction was initiated in June 1960; closure of dam started in June 1962; deliberate impoundment was started January 23, 1963. Accumulated damages prevented by Marshall Ford Reservoir through FY 1998 were $270,032,300 and by Twin Buttes through FY 1998 were $1,118,000. Twin Buttes Reservoir consists of two separate pools, one on South Concho River and the other on Middle Concho River and Spring Creek. Equalizing channel between these two pools is at elevation 1925.0. Costs for FY 1998 from regular funds for operation of both reservoirs were $48,030. 29. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 30-C.) 30. WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Table 30-E.) Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 585, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization); emergency streambank protection under Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as amended; Snagging and Clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control Section 208, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress, as amended. Emergency flood control, hurricane-flood, and shore protection activities (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Environmental restoration under Section 1135, Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress, as amended. Fiscal year costs were $97,746 for disaster preparedness; no levee repair. Multi-Purpose Projects Including Power 31. ROBERT DOUGLAS WILLIS HYDROPOWER, TX Location. For location of completed dam see Town Bluff Dam-B.A. Steinhagen Lake, Texas in this chapter. Existing project. Installation of hydroelectric power generating facilities at Town Bluff Dam was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1945 (Public Law 79-14), March 2, 1945, but deferred in the original construction. Town BluffDam was completed and placed in operation in 1951. A Design Analysis Report completed in April 1982 and a Feasibility Report was approved September 9, 1983 indicated that installing hydropower at this project was economically feasible. The hydropower facilities include a 7,400 kilowatt power plant (two units at 3,700 kilowatts each), intake and outlet facilities, and necessary switchgear equipment is located in the main embankment at the old diversion channel. The plant is operated remotely from the Sam Rayburn project. The project produces an estimated 35,900 megawatt hours of energy per year. There is no Federal cost on this project. It is completely funded by non-Federal funds. The estimated non- Federal cost is $18,643,000. 101st Congress House Report 923, effective February 7,1989, changed the name of Town Bluff Hydropower to Robert Douglas Willis Hydropower. Local cooperation. A contract with the Sam Rayburn Municipal Power Authority was approved by Secretary of the Army, June 28,1985, relative to financing, escrow agreement, and power sales agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 39-12 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT 32. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX Location. Dam is on Angelina River 25.2 miles upstream from its confluence with Neches River and about 10.0 miles northwest of Jasper, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report 1969. Construction was started August 1956 and project was ready for beneficial use in March 1965. Estimated cost of project is $68,683,000 including $3,000,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. A contract with the Lower Neches Valley Authority, a State agency, to contribute $3,000,000 toward the first cost and an additional $200,000 annually for 50 years after completion of the project was approved by the Secretary of the Army on January 22, 1957. Contribution of $3,000,000 was made in full and annual payments to date of $5,400,000 have been made by the Authority. A contract with the city of Lufkin for water supply storage was approved May 27, 1969 by the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost of $525,600. To date the city has paid $231,424. Also under the contract the city of Lufkin must pay annually 0.692 percent of the annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the city has paid $204,060. Operations during fiscal year. Continued routine operation and maintenance. Benefits accrued to Sam Rayburn project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1998 were $487,789,700. 33. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX (DAM SAFETY) Location. For location of completed dam see Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, Texas in this chapter. Existing project. The original 2200-foot wide uncontrolled spillway was constructed through erodible loose sand, shaley clay, and sandstone. Based on experience of significant erosion at other uncontrolled and unlined spillways constructed through less erodible material, the spillway at Sam Rayburn Dam would have experienced severe erosion damage and probably breach during passage of floods in excess of the 150-year flood frequency (25 percent of Probable Maximum Flood). The original spillway was removed in part and replaced with a new reinforced concrete weir, stilling basin and outfall channel near the existing spillway structure. The new weir was completed December 1996 and has a width of 640 feet, an overall length of 433 feet, an outfall channel approximately 5,000 feet long and a crest elevation of 176.0 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD). Estimated Federal cost for the spillway modification is $40,000,000 (Oct 1,1997, base price) and $1,000,200 is to be reimbursed by hydropower sponsors, $101,000 from the city of Lufkin and $330,000 from the Lower Neches Valley Authority. Operations during fiscal year. During FY 1998, funds were used to complete the foundation report on the spillway and initiate financial closeout of the project. The project was physically completed in December 1996. 34. TOWN BLUFF DAMB. A. STEINHAGEN LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Neches River about 12.4 miles below mouth of Angelina River, onehalf mile north of Town Bluff Texas, and 93.0 river miles north of Beaumont, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction started March 1947 and project was ready for beneficial use in April 1951. Estimated cost of project is $9,888,000, including $2,000,000 contribution by local interests. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 35. WHITNEY LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Brazos River, about 442 miles above mouth of river, 5.5 miles southwest of Whitney, Texas, and about 38 miles upstream from city of Waco, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started May 1947 and ready for flood control use in December 1951. First power was placed on-the-line in June 1953. Raise power pool is complete. Estimated cost of project is $46,306,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies.A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 3, 1982. To date, the Authority has paid $259,608. Operations during fiscal year. Continued routine operation and maintenance. Benefits accrued to Whitney Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1998 were $232,942,400. 39-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 General Investigations 36. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $1,108,077 for flood damage prevention studies; $30,875 for coordination with other agencies; $0 for reviewed of deferred projects; $48,103 for special studies; $0 for review of completed projects; $0 for environmental services partnerships; $49,125 for miscellaneous activities; for a total of $1,236,180. 37. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN DALLAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION, TX Dallas Floodway Extension is located on the Trinity River in the city of Dallas, Dallas County, Texas. The plan of improvement provides for extending the existing Floodway downstream about 9 miles to the confluence of the Trinity River and Five Mile Creek. The plan consists of a levied floodway and flood conveyance improvement (channel) along the main stem, Five Mile Creek and White Rock Creek. Maintained free of encroachments, the levees and channels would provide Standard Project Flood protection for approximately 6,450 acres of urban lands currently subject to flooding. The estimated planning and engineering estimate is $8,120,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1991. Fiscal year costs were $1,179,200. GRAHAM, TX (BRAZOS RIVER BASIN) Graham is located in Graham, Young County, Texas. The plan of improvement provides a buy-out of 127 structures within the 10-year flood plain in the city of Graham, TX; install a flood warning system to protect residents above the buy-out zone; create recreational areas consisting of a trail, picnic sites, and park road; and environmental restoration of the project lands with native vegetation. The environmental restoration includes replanting of native trees, shrubs, and herbaceous vegetation. This feature will restore a portion of the bottomland hardwood forest that has been adversely impacted by past floodplain development. Planning, engineering and design estimate is $250,000, and was initiated in FY 1998. Fiscal year costs were $1,454. 38. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Work was continued under the Flood Plain Management Services on the compilation of information on floods and potential flood damages, including identification of those areas subject to inundation. Fiscal year expenditures for these activities totaled $387,405. Fiscal year costs were $17,613 for hydrologic studies. 39-14 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT TABLE 30-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 19981' 1. Trinity River Project, New Work: TX Includes Channel to Approp. Liberty, Tennessee Cost: Colony Lake, and Dallas Floodway Extension 2. Aquilla Lake, TX New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 3. Bardwell Lake, TX New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 4. Beals Creek, New Work: Big Spring, TX Approp. Cost 5. Belton Lake, TX New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 6. Benbrook Lake, TX New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 7. Canyon Lake, TX New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 8. Ferrells Bridge Dam- New Work: Lake O' The Pines, TX Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 9. Grapevine Lake, TX New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - - 22,574,865 -- - - 22,574,865 -- - - 45,506,300 -- - - 45,506,300 581,500 546,960 560,000 534,560 7,899,127 770,640 610,311 577,909 552,535 7,890,163 -- - - 10,934,505 -- - - 10,934,505 1,150,300 1,167,730 1,329,000 1,248,626 27,313,97818 1,118,165 1,158,409 1,271,354 1,355,681 26,133,271 18 470,000 1,217,008 3,811,000 1,600,000 7,528,000 545,392 269,195 4,136,348 1,862,152 7,064,515 -- - - 16,960,549 -- - - 16,960,5491 2,056,800 2,166,950 2,636,000 2,472,745 42,494,60418 2,027,560 2,210,757 2,615,172 2,419,364 42,305,77318 -- - - 13,130,463 -- - - 13,069,9912 1,526,200 1,615,650 1,656,000 1,637,734 35,412,91918 1,457,542 1,733,258 1,643,236 1,539,518 33,901,08318 - - - 19,088,524 s -- - - 19,088,524 1,872,400 2,192,200 2,591,000 2,819,591 32,064,290 18 1,875,076 2,231,476 2,546,045 2,837,762 31,753,906 18 -- - - 14,175,197' -- - - 14,175,19756 2,054,500 2,039,800 2,477,208 2,176,269 46,307,80218 2,123,787 2,161,065 2,180,427 2,206,332 46,015,12318 -- - - 21,317,790 -- - - 21,317,790 1,687,000 1,857,675 2,078,500 1,887,862 41,076,37618 1,597,687 1,930,147 1,988,540 1,859,271 40,901,157 18 39-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 30-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 199817 10. Hords Creek Lake, TX 11. Jim Chapman Lake, TX (Contributed Funds) 12. Joe Pool Lake, TX 13. Lavon Lake, TX 14. Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement, TX 15. Lewisville Dam, TX 16. Navarro Mills Lake, TX 17. O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake, TX 18. Proctor Lake, TX New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Aprop. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - - 2,731,0898 -- - - 2,731,089 1,098,050 960,203 991,000 1,087,776 19,789,19618 1,065,184 959,881 1,017,136 1,060,055 19,668,32618 3,047,000 3,456,602 502,000 2,376,166 400,000 1,500,000 140,044,887 418,497 357,103 138,509,759 -- - - 227,000 -- - - 227,000 1,748,000 822,400 2,592,000 1,184,429 8,429,829 1,648,229 924,711 979,828 1,235,029 6,813,284 94,374 706,800 937,495 2,049,400 2,127,500 8,650 686,325 735,482 (-)8,995 701,000 684,504 2,217,557 2,681,000 2,193,757 2,392,643 - 188,960,000 - 188,873,609 742,311 7,852,044 769,060 7,831,326 2,414,617 2,710,436 12,864,796 12,864,796 47,393,41218 47,314,10218 _ 69,796,862 _ 69,796,862 2,054,600 2,173,121 1,034,200 982,783 1,062,975 1,113,091 1,432,400 1,404,795 3,926,250 3,775,204 1,296,700 1,360,083 1,215,050 1,319,881 1,421,550 1,404,574 2,533,328 2,348,636 1,394,000 1,367,519 731,000 696,444 2,073,000 2,125,556 2,354,593 2,550,593 1,269,418 1,300,276 1,077,238 1,124,866 2,150,233 2,180,765 25,333,988 25,333,988' 59,771,35618 56,928,44818 9,846,759 9,846,75911 26,179,93118 26,151,76918 16,027,467 16,027,467 23,494,18818 23,472,73118 14,469,585 14,469,585 32,437,52218 32,217,31218 39-16 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT TABLE 30-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998'~ 19. Ray Roberts Lake, TX 31. Robert Douglas Willis Hydropower, TX (Contributed Funds) 32. Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservior, TX 33. Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, TX (Dam Safety) (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 20. San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 21. San Gabriel River, TX Granger Lake Georgetown 22. Somerville Lake, TX 23. Stillhouse Hollow Dam, TX New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contri. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Aprop. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 5,695,000 5,334,718 798,200 1,094,670 4,279,000 4,093,294 651,900 660,181 1,893,000 2,130,533 731,000 696,961 3,000,000 2,810,234 931,265 814,104 319,428,700 318,417,555 7,663,767 7,454,368 - - - - 18,628,463 - - - - 18,628,463 - - - - 60,670,957 - - - - 60,670,95712 3,526,500 3,497,250 4,314,000 4,018,935 73,855,218 18 3,687,148 3,809,294 3,740,446 4,096,596 72,872,62318 13,468,000 8,688,000 2,200,000 2,600,000 40,514,000 11,699,241 13,031,871 2,126,180 2,628,705 40,330,039 107,639 112,489 7,300,000 5,982,000 7,487,355 5,309,631 - 177,600 - - - - 293,615 55,933 117,187 229,355 3,564,000 3,832,116 268,900 177,600 1,503,000 1,816,452 43,568 1,524,905 150,852,048 150,754,963 4,001,268 5,213,905 - 101,796,100 - 101,796,100 1,184,850 1,212,836 1,211,300 1,200,344 1,255,400 1,273,893 1,397,550 1,422,543 1,411,000 1,436,996 1,484,000 1,434,107 1,411,484 1,412,614 1,510,134 1,538,068 21,153,68518 19,841,69018 20,151,30718 20,114,40818 - - - - 27,790,438 - - - - 27,790,438 1,911,350 2,127,900 2,309,000 2,387,292 42,785,68018 2,114,655 2,162,852 2,308,393 2,417,204 34,678,887 18 - - - - 20,522,084 13 - - - - 20,522,084 1,365,000 1,364,000 1,688,000 1,431,623 27,206,12018 1,345,714 1,373,463 1,689,654 1,419,740 27,094,98718 39-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 30-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998" 34. Town Bluff Dam- New Work: B.A Steinhagen Lake, Approp. - - - - 6,602,737 TX Cost - - - - 6,602,737"14 Maint. Approp. 1,261,500 1,491,200 1,418,500 1,427,421 26,294,07818 Cost 1,223,596 1,483,018 1,412,917 1,381,961 26,090,33818 24. Waco Lake, TX New Work: Approp. - - - - 49,521,121 1 Cost - - - - 49,521,121 Maint Approp. 2,125,250 1,930,125 1,845,672 2,026,823 41,346,88818 Cost 2,457,946 1,968,762 1,925,185 2,032,899 41,233,63418 25. Waco Lake, TX New Work: (Dam Safety) Approp. 200,000 245,000 284,000 997,000 1,726,000 Cost 33,642 387,924 225,002 300,366 946,926 35. Whitney Lake, TX New Work: Approp. - - - - 42,952,938 Cost - - - - 42,952,938 1 Maint. Approp. 3,832,300 3,437,925 3,262,000 3,569,406 69,587,29518 Cost 3,284,113 3,905,527 3,540,370 3,622,987 69,291,130 18 26. Wright Patman Dam New Work: and Lake, TX Approp. - - - - 35,731,626 Cost - - - - 35,731,626 Maint. Approp. 2,185,625 2,237,750 2,386,292 2,500,213 45,621,02518 Cost 2,515,359 2,291,675 2,204,934 2,632,788 45,459,28218 1Excludes $47,309 receipts from reconveyance of land deposited to miscellaneous receipts. 2 Excludes $322,346 receipts from reconveyance of land deposited to miscellaneous receipts. 3 Excludes $1,422,848 expended for new work from contributed funds, including $22,848 "Contributed Funds Other" for installation and operation of gages for leakage study. 4 Includes $1,378,486 for Code 711, $52,808 for Code 713, and $399,739 accelerated Public Works Act funds. Excludes $1,711,200 contributed funds. Includes $1,376,322 for Code 711, $52,808 for Code 713, and $399,739 accelerated Public Works Act funds. Excludes $4,137 reimbursed in Fiscal Year 1973. 6 Claim Northeast Texas Municipal Water District $16,546. Three payments of $12,410 less real estate charges of $1,325, making a total of $2,811 reimbursed in Fiscal Year 1972, Fiscal Year 1973, and Fiscal Year 1974. ' Excludes $146,795 receipts from reconveyance of land deposited to miscellaneous receipts, and $2,040,026 for new work expended from contributed funds. 8 Excludes $105,079 expended from contributed funds. s Excludes receipts from reconveyance of land of $426,606 which were deposited to miscellaneous receipts, and $3,676,661 for new work expended from contributed funds. 1o Includes $130,000 under appropriation 96X5125. 11 Excludes $300,000 expended from contributed funds. 2 Excludes $3,000,000 expended from contributed funds. 13 Includes receipts from disposals and revocation of funds related thereto. 14 Excludes $2,000,000 contributed funds expended. *1 Excludes $2,750,000 expended for contributed funds. 16 Excludes $188,282 receipts from reconveyance of lands deposited to miscellaneous receipts. 17 Includes funds provided by the Jobs Act (PL 98-8, dated March 24, 1983). 8 Beginning Fiscal Year 1985 data shown on Table A includes Special Recreation Use Fees. Data for previous fiscal years have been changed to conform to the new procedure. 39-18 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT TABLE 30-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. Aug. 13, 1968 3. Mar. 31, 1960 4. Oct. 12, 1972 5. Jul. 24, 1946 Sep. 3, 1954 6. Mar. 2, 1945 7. Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 8. Jul. 24, 1946 9. Mar. 2, 1945 10. Aug. 18, 1941 11. Aug. 3, 1955 12. Oct. 27, 1965 13. Mar. 2, 1945 AQUILLA LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Aquilla Creek, about 6.8 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas and about 24 miles north of Waco, Texas. BARDWELL LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Waxahachie Creek about 5 miles south of Ennis, Texas. BEALS CREEK, BIG SPRING, TX Construction of a channel. BELTON LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Leon River about 3 miles north of Belton, Texas. Modification of the dam to provide for generation of hydroelectric power. BENBROOK LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Clear Fork of the Trinity River about 10 miles southwest of Fort Worth, Texas. CANYON LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Guadalupe River about 12 miles northwest of New Braunfels, Texas. FERRELLS BRIDGE DAMLAKE O' THE PINES, TX Provides for construction of an earth-fill dam and reservoir area. GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Denton Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, about 20 miles northwest of Dallas, Texas. HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Hords Creek, a tributary of Pecan Bayou, near the city of Coleman, Texas. JIM CHAPMAN LAKE, TX Construction of an earth-fill dam and reservoir area. JOE POOL LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Mountain Creek, adjacent to the city limits of Grand Prairie, Texas, about 3 miles above the existing Mountain Creek Dam. LAVON LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the East Fork ofthe Trinity River, about 22 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. S. Doc. 52, 90th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc 424, 82nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 115, 92nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 88, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc, 247, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 370, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc 488, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 533, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. 39-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 30-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 14. Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 2, 1945 16. Sep. 3, 1954 Dec. 31,1970 Aug. 18, 1941 Sep. 3, 1954 19. Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 33. Mar. 2, 1945 20. Sep. 3,1954 LAVON LAKE MODIFICATION AND EAST FORK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Enlarge Lavon Dam and enlargement and realignment of the lower 25 miles of the East Fork of the Trinity River, including rehabilitation of existing levees. Improvement of Collin County Road 115. LEWISVILLE DAM, TX Construction of a dam on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River near the city of Lewisville, Texas. NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Richland Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, about 16 miles southwest of Corsicana, Texas. Alteration of FM Highway 3164 in Wolf Creek Park. O.C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the North Concho River just above San Angelo, Texas. PROCTOR LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Leon River about 8 miles northeast of Comanche, Texas. RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX Construction ofa dam on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River between Sanger and Aubrey, Texas, about 30 miles upstream from the existing Lewisville Dam. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX Construction of a dam on the Angelina River about 10 miles northwest of Jasper, Texas. SAM RAYBURN SPILLWAY (DAM SAFETY ASSURANCE), TX Modification of the spillway and embankment. SANANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT TX Channel improvement of the San Antonio River and tributaries in and near the city of San Antonio, Texas. H. Doc. 554, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 498, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 315, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 344, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. 39-20 15. 17. 18. 32. FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT TABLE 30-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 21. Sep. 3, 1954 Jan. 3, 1975 22. Sep. 3, 1954 23. Sep. 3, 1954 34. Mar. 2, 1945 31. Mar. 2, 1945 1. Oct. 27, 1965 24. Sep. 3, 1954 SAN GABRIEL RIVER PROJECT, TX Construction of (1) a dam (Granger Dam and Lake) on the San Gabriel River about 7 miles east of Granger, Texas, (2) a dam (North Fork Lake) on the north Fork of the San Gabriel River about 3.5 miles northwest of Georgetown, Texas and (3) a dam (South Fork Lake) on the South Fork of the San Gabriel River about 3 miles southwest of Georgetown, Texas. SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX Construction of a dam onYegua Creek about 2 miles south of Somerville, Texas. STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX Construction of a dam on the Lampasas River about 5 miles southwest of Belton, Texas. TOWN BLUFF DAM-B.A. STEINHAGEN LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Neches River near Jasper, Texas. ROBERT DOUGLAS WILLIS HYDROPOWER, TX Construction of two units at 3,000 kilowatts each of hydroelectric power generating facilities connected with Town Bluff-BA Steinhagen Lake, Texas. TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, TX Construction of Tennessee Colony Dam located at river mile 339.2 on the Trinity River about 16 miles west of Palestine, Texas; a multiple purpose channel from the Houston, Texas ship channel to Fort Worth, Texas; a distance of approximately 363 miles, an extension of the existing Dallas, Texas, Floodway downstream approximately 9.0 miles; a realignment and enlargement of the West Fork of the Trinty River from the mouth of the West Fork to the existing Fort Worth, Texas, Floodway, a distance of approximately 31 miles; and water conveyance facilities involving construction of about 98 miles of pipeline from Tennessee Colony Lake to the existing Benbrook Lake. WACO LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the northwest edge of Waco, Texas, below the confluence of the North, South, and Middle Bosque Rivers. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. and H Doc. 591, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess., and H. Doc. 364, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. 39-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 30-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents WACO LAKE, TX (Dam Safety) 25. Sep. 3, 1954 Modification of raising the dam crest. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. WHITNEY LAKE, TX 35. Aug. 18, 1941 Construction of a dam on the Brazos River, about H. Doc, 390, 76th Cong., 19 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas. Raise 1st Sess. the power pool 13.0 feet. WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX 26. Jul. 24, 1946 Construction of an earth-fill dam and reservoir. H. Doc, 602, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. 39-22 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 30-C (See Section 28 of Text) For Last Full Cost to September 30, 1998 Report See Annual Report Operation and Project For Construction Maintenance Belton Lake Hydropower Study, TX' - - - Belton Lake Modification, TX3 1988 Big Fossil Creek, TX' 1969 - - Big Sandy Lake, TX' 1986 - - Big Spring, TX2 1979 Boggy Creek, Austin, TX' 1992 - - Brownwood Channel Improvment, TX' - - - Calloway Branch, Hurst, TX' 1986 - - Carl L. Estes Dam and Lake, TX' 1979 - - Dam "A" Lake, TX' 1987 - - Duck Creek Channel Improvment, TX' 1983 - - Elm Fork Floodway, TX' 1987 - - Fort Worth Floodway (Clear Fork), TX' 1971 - - Fort Worth Floodway (West Fork), TX' 1971 - - Grand Prairie, TX (Landfill)' 1987 - - Grand Prairie, TX (Meyers Road)' 1989 - - Greenville, TX' 1983 - - Lake Brownwood Modification, TX' 1983 - - Lake Fork Lake, Sabine River, TX' - - - Lake Worth, Tarrant County, TX4 - - - Millican, TX' 1988 - - Navasota Lake, Navasota River, TX' - - - Roanoak Lake, TX' 1979 - - Rockland Lake, TX' 1988 - - Rutledge Hollow Creek Channel Improvement, 1969 - - Poteet, TX' San Gabriel River, South, TX' - - - Tarrant County, Tony's Marine Creek, TX' - - - Zacate Creek Channel, TX' 1983 - - 'Recommended for Deauthorization 'Deauthorized 39-23 'Completed 2Inactive 3Deferred REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 30-D (See Section 26 of Text) Location Dates of Inspection Bear Creek, Collin County............. ..................................... ..... Apr. 14, 1997 Beltline Road Bridge, Richardson............ .............. .......................... Dec. 2, 1997 Big Fossil Creek .................................................... ......... Mar. 13,1998 Boggy Creek, Austin ......................................... .................. . Apr. 21, 1995 Calloway Branch, Hurst ........................................................... Oct. 7, 1997 Calloway Branch, Airline Dr. Pk., Richland ............................................. Aug. 19, 1998 Cat Claw Creek, Abilene ........... ....................................... Jul. 14,1998 Dallas Floodway............................................................... Oct. 8-9,1997 Delaware Branch, Dallas....................................................... Dec. 4, 1997 Dry Branch, Grand Prairie ....................................................... Jun. 9, 1998 East Fork ...................................................................... Nov. 30,1994 Fort Worth Floodway ................................................... Oct. 8, 1997 Grand Prairie Landfill ................................................ Feb. 20, 1998 Grand Prairie Meyers Road..................................................... Feb. 20, 1998 Hutton Branch, Carrollton ........... .................... ............ . Dec. 2, 1997 Johnson Creek, Grand Prairie ..................................................... Jul. 15, 1998 Long Branch, Greenville ......................................................... Oct. 15, 1997 Lorean Branch, Hurst ............................................................. Oct. 7, 1997 McCoy Road Bridge, Carrollton ................................................... Dec. 2, 1997 Munday ......... ............................................................... Nov.3,1997 Park Row Bridge, Arlington ................................................ Dec. 10, 1997 Pleasanton ............................................................. ....... Apr.18,1996 Poteet ............... ......... .................................. ............... Apr.19,1996 Ridglea C. C. Dr. Bridge, Fort Worth................................................ Jan. 23, 1998 Roaring Springs Road Bridge, Westover Hills ....................................... Jan. 30, 1998 Rush Creek Channel, Arlington ................................................... Dec. 10, 1997 San Antonio Floodway ........................... ............................. Sep. 24, 1998 San Antonio Tunnels ......................................................... Jul. 20, 1995 Singing Hills Creek, Watauga ...................................................... Dec. 3, 1997 Sulphur Branch Channel, Euless.................................................. Dec. 2, 1997 WalnutCreek,Seguin ........................................................... Nov. 16, 1994 Wheeler Creek, Gainsville....................................................... Jun. 16,1998 Zacate Creek, Laredo...........................................................Dec. 20,1994 39-24 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION TABLE 30-E (See Section 29 of Text) Project Flood Control Activities - Section 205 Cost Arlington, Grand Prairie, TX ..................................................... $ (-) 174,079 Browder Creek, Springton, TX..................................................... 3,412 Calloway Branch, Richland Hills, TX............................................... 3,253 Delaware Creek, Dallas, TX....................................................... 12,932 Dry Branch Creek, Grand Prairie, TX .............................................. 19,454 Duck Creek, Garland, TX ......................................................... 1,815,969 Farmers Branch, White Settlement, TX.............................................. 902 Hickory Creek, Balch Springs,TX.................................................. 81,100 Johnson Creek, Grand Prairie, TX ................................................. 146,731 Little Fossil Creek, Haltom City, TX................................................ 69,554 Section 205 Coordination......................................................... 9,570 Singing Hills Creek, Watauga, TX.................................................. 18,100 Sulphur Branch, Euless, TX....................................................... 32,580 Ten Mile Creek, De Soto, TX........................................................ 31,837 Project Emergency Bank Protection - Section 14 Cost Colorado River, Caldwell Lane, Travis Co., TX....................................... $ 25,701 Colorado River, Smithville Water Supply, TX.......................................... 62,452 Cottonwood Creek, Spring Valley Rd., TX ........................................... 29,926 Section 14 Coordination .......................................................... 5,196 Washington on Brazos State Park, TX.............................................. 811,614 West Fork Trinity River Landfill, Arlington, TX...................................... 75,764 West Fork Trinity River Water Plant, TX............................................ 37,393 39-25 GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT * Galveston District comprises drainage basins of all short streams arising in coastal plain of Texas and flowing into the Gulf of Mexico, including the entire basin of Buffalo Bayou, San Jacinto, San Bernard, Lavaca, Navidad, Mission, and Aransas Rivers. It embraces Agua Dulce, San Fernando, and Olmos Creek Basins draining into Baffin Bay, and coastal area south thereof to the Rio Grande and east of western Boundary of Starr County, Texas. It includes lower basins of major streams flowing into the Gulf of Mexico: Sabine River, Texas and Louisiana, downstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas; Neches River downstream from Town Bluff gaging station; Trinity River downstream from Texas State Highway 19 crossing at Riverside, Texas; Brazos River downstream from confluence with Navasota River; Colorado River downstream from northern boundary of Fayette County; Guadalupe River downstream from confluence with San Marcos River; San Antonio River downstream from confluence with Escondido Creek; Nueces River downstream from confluence with Frio and Atascosa River. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Aquatic Plant Control (Southwestern Division) 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX 3. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX 4. Double Bayou, TX 5. Freeport Harbor, TX 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX 7. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL, and the Mexican Border 8. Houston-Galveston Navigation Channels, TX 9. Houston Ship Channel, TX 10. Matagorda Ship Channel, TX 11. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX 12. Texas City Channel, TX 13. Trinity River and Tributaries, TX 13A. Anahuac Channel, TX 13B. Channel to Liberty, TX 13C. Wallisville Lake, TX 14. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys 15. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization Shore Protection 16. Corpus Christi Beach, TX Flood Control 17. Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX 17A. Addicks and Barker Reservoirs, TX 17B. Brays Bayou, TX 17C. Greens Bayou, TX 17D. Halls Bayou, TX 17E. Hunting Bayou, TX 17F. Little White Oak Bayou, TX 17G. Carpenters Bayou, TX 18. Buffalo Bayou at Lynchburg, TX 19. Clear Creek, TX Page Flood Control (cont.) 40-2 40-2 40-2 40-3 40-3 40-4 40-5 40-7 40-8 40-8 40-9 40-9 40-10 40-10 40-10 AF 1 1 20. Cypress Creek, TX 21. Lower Rio Grande Basin, TX 21A. Arroyo Colorado, TX 21B. South Main Channel, TX 21C. Raymondville Drain, TX 22. Sims Bayou, TX 23. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Works 24. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization 25. Emergency Stream Bank and Shoreline Erosion Work and Snagging and Clearing Under Special Authorization Environmental Restoration 26. Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment 27. Laguna Madre Seagrass Restoration, TX 404--112 General Investigations 4012 28. Surveys 40-12 29. Coordination With Other Agencies 30. Collection and Study of Basic Data 31. Pre-construction Engineering and Design 40-12 40-12 40-12 40-13 40-13 40-13 40-14 40-14 40-14 40-14 40-14 Tables 40-A Cost and Financial Statement 40-B Authorizing Legislation 40-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects 40-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 40-E Other Authorized Environmental Restoration Projects 40-F Deauthorized Projects 40-G Total Cost of Existing Projects 40-H Channel Dimensions 40-I Channel Dimensions, GIWW Tributary Channels 40-J Dredging Operations Page 40-15 40-15 40-15 40-16 40-16 40-16 40-17 40-17 40-17 40-18 40-18 40-18 40-18 40-18 40-18 40-20 40-25 40-41 40-42 40-43 40-44 40-45 40-46 40-50 40-52 40-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION) 1965 ACT Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Texas. Previous project. For details see page 699 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. A comprehensive project to provide for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, hydrilla, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths, from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Texas in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures. Control of hydrilla, water-hyacinth and alligatorweed continues in the Nueces River Basin, North Coastal Area, Guadalupe River Basin, Sabine River Basin, Trinity River Basin, Cypress Creek Basin, Neches River Basin, South Coastal Area, San Jacinto River Basin, Rio Grande Basin, Colorado River Basin and Brazos River Basin. Local cooperation. Sec. 302, 1965 River and Harbor Act, amended by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, applies. Operations during fiscal year. The cost-sharing program had been funded for $31,000 for FY 98, but chemical control work by the State of Texas was curtailed for the year to await interpretation of herbicide labelling instructions by the Environmental Protection Agency. Mechanical control of waterhyacinth and hydrilla was accomplished by the State along segments of the Rio Grande river without Corps participation. The one year cost-sharing, cost-reimbursable contract, with options for an additional four years, was extended for option year three with the State of Texas in order to keep the contract in force. 2. BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX Location. At extreme south end of coast of Texas, about 7 miles north of mouth of Rio Grande and about 5 miles east of Brownsville, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11301.) Previous project. For details see page 1017 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in various sections of the waterway as shown in Table 40-H. Project also provides for dual jetties at the gulf entrance, a north jetty 6,330 feet long, a south jetty 5,092 feet long, and 1,000-foot extension to existing north jetty and for maintenance of 3rd fishing harbor constructed by local interests. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet, and extreme range is about 2 feet. All depths refer to mean low tide. To some extent, height of tides is dependent on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season, water surface in southern end of Laguna Madre may be raised 4 feet or more above mean low tide in the gulf. Total cost for new work was: Federal (Corps) $16,013,607, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects, and non-Federal $9,324,148, including $5,337,869 contributed funds, $796,380 relocations, and $3,189,899 other costs, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. Widening Brownsville Channel from Goose Island to Brownsville turning basin and deepening southeast corner of Brownsville turning basin to 36 feet was completed in April 1980. The 1,000-foot extension to existing north jetty was deauthorized under Section 1001 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The entrance channel was enlarged from 38 feet by 300 feet to 44 feet by 300 feet in FY 1992. Construction of an environmental mitigation site consisting of the creation of a 16 acre tidal wetland which included shoal grass and black mangroves, was completed in 1997. (See Table 40-G for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1998.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Numerous terminal facilities for bulk and liquid cargo are available. (See Port Series No. 26, revised 1991.) Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: In addition to the routine maintenance, a claim in regards to the contract for dredging the entrance channel, awarded December 28, 1996, was settled at an increase Federal cost of $97,747 and the non-Federal cost was decreased by $26,775. (See Table 40-J for dredging operations.) CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. This project, formerly known as the Port Aransas-Corpus Christi Waterway, Texas, was changed to Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Texas, by 1968 River and Harbor Act. This is a consolidation of old improvements of Port Aransas, Texas, and channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi, Texas. Aransas Pass is on southern portion of Texas Coast, 180 miles southwest of Galveston and 132 miles north of mouth of Rio Grande. Aransas Pass connects Corpus Christi Bay with the gulf. Waterway extends from deep water in the gulf through Aransas Pass jettied entrance, thence westerly 20.75 miles to and including a turning basin at Corpus Christi, thence westerly 1.75 miles through Industrial Canal to and including turning basin at Avery Point, thence westerly 4.25 miles to and including a turning basin near Tule Lake, thence northwesterly 1.8 miles to and including a turning basin at Viola, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11308, 11309, 11311, and 11314.) Previous project. For details see page 1861 of Annual Report for 1915. 40-2 3. GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT Existing project. (See Table 40-H for existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins comprising this waterway.) Project also provides for two rubblestone jetties at Aransas Pass entrance, extending into the gulf from St. Joseph and Mustang Islands, project lengths of which are 11,190 and 8,610 feet, respectively. Project further provides for a stone dike on St. Joseph Island about 20,991 feet long, connecting with north jetty and extending up this island to prevent a channel being cut around jetty. Project also provides for a breakwater at the entrance to the harbor area at Port Aransas, and for the realignment of the existing 12-foot by 100-foot project channel to Port Aransas. The breakwater consists of two overlapping sections. The one on the east side of the realigned entrance channel has a length of 830 feet and the second, located on the west side of the entrance channel, has a length of 1,290 feet. The channel to Port Aransas was relocated in the 300-foot clear distance between the overlapping sections. The portion of the channel remaining inside the breakwaters was widened to 150 feet. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range at Aransas Pass is about 1.1 feet and extreme range about 2 feet, and at Corpus Christi mean range about 1 foot and extreme about 1.5 feet. Heights of tides are dependent largely on strength and directions of winds, and during strong "northers" in the winter season water surface may be depressed as much as 3 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: Federal (Corps) $74,938,515, including $456,515 for Port Aransas Breakwaters and exclusive of amount expended on previous projects: and non-Federal $18,977,431 (includes $768 for Port Aransas Breakwaters) including $7,644,435 contributed funds and value of useful work performed, $3,320,228 lands, $6,027,000 relocations and $1,985,000 other cost. (October 1, 1992 base price.) The Port Aransas-Corpus Christi 40-foot project was completed in 1966. The Jewel Fulton Canal was completed in 1963. The Port Aransas Breakwaters were completed in July 1973. Deepening deep-draft channels to 45 feet from Tule Lake Turning Basin through Viola Turning Basin was completed in 1989, and constructing a mooring area at Port Ingleside with dolphins has been deferred. Entrance and jetty channels have been dredged to project depth and width, and dredging of channel from Harbor Island to and through the Chemical Turning Basin at 45- foot depth has been completed. Initial mooring dolphins were completed in May 1979. Disposal area levees, Area 1 and Rincon were completed in August 1984. First stage disposal area levees, South Shore, were completed in September 1984. Construction contract for mitigation terracing was completed in 1997. (See Table 40-G for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1998.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities on Harbor Island at head of Aransas Pass, Ingleside, Corpus Christi, La Quinta, Avery Point, and Viola, are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series, No. 25, revised 1993, Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine Maintenance. (See Table 40-J for dredging operations.) 4. DOUBLE BAYOU, TX Location. Enters Trinity Bay on the east side about 30 miles north of Galveston and about 8.25 miles south of Anahuac, Texas. Existing Project. Project provides for a channel 7 feet by 125 feet from the mouth of Double Bayou to the 7-foot contour in Trinity Bay, a length of 3.9 miles; and a channel, know as West Fork, 7 feet by 100 feet for a length of 2.0 miles. The project was completed in 1971. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 0.5 feet and extreme range is about 1.2 feet. Height of tides is dependent largely on winds, and during strong north winds in the winter season, water surfaces may be depressed 1.5 feet below mean low tide. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11326.) Local cooperation. Fully Complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities are privately owned. At the mouth of the bayou is a timber wharf for loading oil barges. Between miles 1 and 1.5 above the mouth are a timber wharf, a boat slip, and a marine railway owned by the Brown and Root Corporation. At mile 3 above the mouth is a small depot for handling oyster shell. The facility consists of a timber bulkhead and hoppers for loading trucks. One-half mile above the mouth are several fishing vessel docks. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: No work was incurred in Fiscal Year 1998. (See Table 40-J for dredging operations.) 5. FREEPORT HARBOR, TX Location. Formed by improvement of Brazos River, Texas, from mouth to about 6 miles upstream to Freeport, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11321 and 11322.) Previous projects. For details see page 1860 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 872 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Existing project dimensions for various channels and basins are shown in Table 40-H on channel dimensions at end of chapter. Existing project also provides for: Dual jetties and a diversion canal for the Brazos River, including a dam, a lock in the dam and necessary auxiliary equipment. Also provides for rehabilitation of southwest jetty and the relocation of the northeast jetty (about 640 feet to the northeast); realignment of the channel between the Jetty Channel and Brazosport Turning Basin; realignment of the channel between Brazosport Turning Basin and Upper Turning Basin; relocation of Upper Turning Basin; and public use facilities adjacent to the Freeport Jetties. The 40-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 30-foot channel from Upper Turning Basin to Stauffer Chemical Plant, including the turning basin, was deauthorized by Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. Construction of lock in diversion dam at local expense is considered inactive. The 38-36 foot project was completed in 1962. New work consists of realigning, deepening and widening the Outer Bar and Jetty Channels; relocating the northeast jetty; rehabilitating the southwest jetty; realigning and deepening the harbor channel between the jetty channel and the Upper Turning Basin; relocating and enlarging the Upper Turning Basin; constructing a turning point near the northwesterly end of the jetty channel; enlarging Brazosport Turning Basin; deepening Brazos Harbor Channel; and enlarging and deepening Brazos Harbor Turning Basin, as authorized by the R&H Act of 1970. The initial contract for the 45 foot project, construction of 3,700 feet of the North Jetty, was awarded in May 1987. Project is essentially complete. Surfside Recreation area is under construction by the Local Sponsor. Navigation problems were identified by the Local Sponsor and pilots, and a contract to make channel adjustments to a bend near the project main turning basin was completed in 1998 to provide full utilization of the 45- foot channel. (See Table 40-G for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1998.) Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet and extreme range is about 2.5 feet. Except under extreme conditions, rises on river and in diversion channel do not cause greater variations in water surface than those caused by tidal action. Estimated cost of new work is: $63,707,000 Federal (Corps) and $470,000 Federal (USCG); and $32,313,000 non-Federal, including $21,302,000 contributed funds, $300,000 contributed work, $6,967,000 lands, $3,174,000 levees and spillways, and $570,000 relocations. (October 1, 1997 base price.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for Section 101 of River and Harbor Act of 1970, under costsharing tenets of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. Local Cooperation Agreement, executed June 26, 1986, along with Amendments 1, 2, 3, and 4 executed March 19, 1987; July 19, 1991; July 19, 1991; and July 15, 1997; respectively, require that local interest provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, including land for recreation, and dredged material disposal areas, presently estimated at $10,141,000, modify or relocate utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary for construction of the project, presently estimated at $570,000, contribute in cash one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated at $530,000; and, during construction, pay 25 percent of the construction costs allocated to deep-draft navigation, including disposal facility construction, presently estimated at $21,302,000. Terminal facilities. Small privately owned wharves, two oil docks, one acid dock, two shell unloading docks and one caustic dock. Brazos River Navigation District has one large dock with four transit sheds over rail facilities permitting all-weather work. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 26, revised 1991, for additional facilities.) Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The contract for bend easing, awarded July 15, 1997, completed in June 1998 at a FY 98 cost of $3,676,128. Confined Placement Site No. 1 was designed and constructed by the Port of Freeport at a total cost of $2,563,985, of which $1,304,239 was the estimated Federal amount accrued in FY 1998. Funds in the amount of $184,000 were also accrued in FY 98 for the Federal share of constructing Surfside Recreation Area. Maintenance: Routine maintenance. A claim for an emergency dredging contract at Freeport's entrance and jetty channel, awarded January 5, 1997, was settled at a cost of $68,993 for FY 1998. (See Table 40-J for dredging operations.) 6. GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX Location. A consolidation of authorized improvements at Galveston, Texas, which includes projects formerly identified as Galveston Harbor, Texas; Galveston Channel, Texas; and Galveston seawall extension. Entrance to Galveston Harbor is on Gulf of Mexico on the northern portion of the Texas Coast. Galveston Channel extends from a point in Galveston Harbor between Bolivar Peninsula and Fort Point to and along wharf front Galveston, Texas, and is about 5 miles long and 1,200 feet wide. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11324/5.) Previous projects. For details see page 1854 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in sections of the waterway shown in Table 40-H. Also provided are: two rubble-mound jetties, the south one extending from Galveston Island and the north one extending from Bolivar Peninsula, for distances of 35,900 feet and 25,907 feet, respectively, into the Gulf of Mexico; a concrete seawall from the angle at Sixth Street and Broadway, in the city of Galveston, to the south jetty, and a 16,300-foot extension of the concrete seawall in a southwesterly direction from 61st Street; for 11 groins along the gulf shore between 12th Street and 61st Street; and for maintenance of seawall from the angle at 6th Street and Broadway to the south jetty. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range in Galveston Harbor is 1.6 feet on outer bar and 1.4 feet on inner bar with extreme ranges of 2.3 and 2.1 feet, respectively. Mean range in Galveston channel is about 1.3 feet and extreme range about 2 feet under ordinary conditions. Height of tides in both Galveston harbor and channel is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. 404 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT Existing project is complete. Dredging of Galveston channel to 36 foot depth was completed in November 1966. Dredging of the realigned entrance and Outer Bar Channel was completed in October 1967. Rehabilitation of the Beach Front Groins was completed June 1970. Dredging of Galveston channel to 40 feet was completed in March 1976. See Section 11. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX regarding work authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Section 8, HOUSTONGALVESTON NAVIGATION CHANNELS, TX, and Section 31, PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN under Houston-Galveston Navigation Channels, TX, for work also authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. (See Table 40-G for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1998.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. None on Galveston Harbor, which is entrance channel leading to terminal facilities on Galveston, Texas City, and Houston Ship Channels. Galveston Channel terminal facilities are mostly on south side of channel. Principal wharves, owned by the city of Galveston, extend from 10th to 41st Street (see Port Series No. 23, revised 1996). A container ship terminal equipped with a crane capable of stacking containers three units high on the deck of any normal container ship has been completed and placed into operation by the city of Galveston at Piers 10 and 11, on the south side of Galveston Channel. The city of Galveston has also placed into operation a barge terminal equipped with two 35- ton and one 5-ton cranes for loading and unloading barges on Lash and Seabee ships at Pier 35 and a docking and holding area for Lash and Seabee barges on Pelican Island, directly across the channel from Piers 35 and 36. Present facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: See Section 8, HOUSTON-GALVESTON NAVIGATION CHANNELS, TX. Maintenance: Routine Maintenance. Also see Section 8, HOUSTON-GALVESTON NAVIGATION CHANNELS, TX. (See Table 40-J for dredging operations.) 7. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL, AND MEXICAN BORDER Location. Extends from a point on Sabine River about 3 miles below Orange, Texas, to Brownsville, Texas, about 421 miles; a navigation channel, about 7 miles long, in Colorado River, extending from Matagorda, Texas, to Gulf of Mexico; a tributary channel in San Bernard River, extending from Intracoastal Waterway crossing to State highway bridge some 30 miles above crossing; a tributary channel in Colorado River extending from Intracoastal Waterway upstream 15.5 miles; a tributary channel extending about 14 miles from Intracoastal Waterway to Palacios, Texas; a tributary channel extending about 2 miles from Intracoastal Waterway to Rockport, Texas; a tributary channel extending about 6 miles from Intracoastal Waterway near Port Aransas, Texas, to town of Aransas Pass, Texas; a tributary channel about onefourth mile long extending from Intracoastal Waterway near Port O'Connor, Texas, into Barroom Bay; a tributary channel extending about 38.8 miles from Intracoastal Waterway via Seadrift to a point in Guadalupe River 5.5 miles below Victoria, Texas; a harbor of refuge for small craft at Seadrift; a channel extending from gulf to Port Mansfield, Texas, about 11 miles; and a tributary channel in Arroyo, Colorado extending from Intracoastal Waterway to a point near Harlingen, Texas, about 31 miles; side channels in vicinity of Port Isabel, Texas, and a small boat basin at Port Isabel, Texas, and a tributary channel extending from Intracoastal Waterway main channel at a point in West Galveston Bay into Offatts Bayou about 2.2 miles with a west turnout (wye connection) 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide between Offatts Bayou Channel and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11302, 11303, 11305, 11306, 11308, 11309, 11314, 11315, 11317, 11319, 11322, 11326, and 11331.) Previous project. For details see page 1859 of Annual Report for 1915. (West Galveston Bay and Brazos River Canal, Texas.) Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in main channel of waterway: A channel 12 feet deep (below mean low tide) and 125 feet wide from the Sabine River to Brownsville, Texas. Relocation of channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide in Matagorda Bay, miles 454.3 to 471.3, relocation of channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide in Corpus Christi Bay, miles 539.4 to 549.7 (mileage is west of Harvey Lock, Louisiana); and alternate channel, 12 feet deep (below mean low tide) and 125 feet wide via Galveston Channel and Galveston Bay to the Galveston causeway; maintenance of existing channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide through Lydia Ann Channel, between Aransas Bay and Aransas Pass; provisions of such passing places, widening of bends, locks and guard locks, railway bridges over artificial cuts as are necessary, and the tributary channels shown in tabulation. The authorized channel 16 feet deep and 125 feet wide from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel is inactive. (See Table 40-I on existing project dimensions provided for in tributary channels.) Removal of the railroad bridge across the canal at Mud Bayou was completed and operation and care of the facility was discontinued on April 14, 1969. Deepening the existing 6 foot by 60 foot side channels at Port Isabel to 12 feet was completed February 22, 1972, Offatts Bayou channel was completed January 1974. Relocation of main channel across Corpus Christi. Bay was completed in September 1976. The 14 foot by 175 foot Channel to Aransas Pass was completed in April 40-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 1979. Dredging Chocolate Bayou Channel was completed in January 1981. Construction of a saltwater barrier in Chocolate Bayou was completed in February 1981. The 12 foot by 125 foot channel relocation route in Matagorda Bay has been deauthorized. The Harbor of Refuge at Seadrift, Texas, has been placed in the inactive category. Mouth of Colorado River: Construction of jetties at mouth of Colorado River was completed in 1986. Construction of a navigation channel from the Gulf to the GIWW and an impoundment basin were fiscally completed in 1991. Construction of Tiger Island Dam and recreation facilities were also completed in 1991. Construction of the recreation facilities at Jetty Park was completed in 1992. Construction of the diversion dam and connecting channel was completed in 1993. Construction of the oyster cultch was completed in 1995. Brazos River Floodgates- Major Rehabilitation: Major rehabilitation of the East Floodgate Guidewalls was completed in 1997. Sargent Beach: Work authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 for construction of a concrete-pile and concrete block revetment structure which extends 8 - miles to protect the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway was completed in 1998. Active authorized work remaining consists of the following: (1) Work authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 for enlarging the existing Channel to Victoria from a depth of 9 feet and width of 100 feet to a depth of 12 feet and width of 125 feet. (2) Sargent Beach, financial completion of work authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 for construction of a concrete-pile and concrete-block revetment structure which extends for an estimated 8 miles to protect the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. (3) Brazos River Floodgates, financial completion of major rehabilitation of the East Floodgate Guidewalls. (4) Aransas National Wildlife Refuge, work authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 for construction of bank protection and a spill containment system through the critical habitat for the endangered whooping crane. (See Table 40-G for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1998.) Mean tidal variation is 0.5 foot at Orange, 1 foot at Port Arthur, 1.3 feet in Galveston Bay, 1.5 feet at Freeport, 1 foot in Matagorda Bay, 1 foot in San Antonio Bay, 1 foot at Corpus Christi, 1.5 feet at Port Isabel, and 1.5 feet at Brownsville. Extreme ranges of tide under ordinary conditions are 1 foot at Orange, 1.5 feet at Port Arthur, 2 feet in Galveston Bay, 2 feet at Freeport, 1.5 feet in Matagorda and San Antonio Bays, 1.5 feet at Corpus Christi, 2 feet at Port Isabel, and 1.5 feet at Brownsville. Height of tides is dependent largely on wind. Strong north winds have depressed water surface as much as 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: Channel to Victoria - $26,624,000 Federal (Corps), $422,000 Federal (Department of Transportation), $58,000 Federal (U.S. Coast Guard), and $6,361,000 non- Federal consisting of $2,958,000 cash, $1,643,000 lands, $175,000 fender system, and $1,585,000 levees and other associated costs. (October 1, 1998 base prices.) Sargent Beach - $29,460,000 Federal (Corps) and $29,460,000 Federal (Inland Waterways Trust Fund). (October 1, 1997 base prices.) Brazos River Floodgates (Major Rehabilitation) - $2,750,000 Federal (Corps) and $2,750,000 Federal (Inland Waterways Trust Fund). (October 1, 1995 base prices.) Aransas National Wildlife Refuge - $20,148,000 Federal (Corps). (October 1, 1998 base prices.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for provisions of Section 101, 1968 River and Harbor Act and Water Resources Development Act of 1988. The Project Cooperation Agreement for Channel to Victoria was executed November 17, 1994. Terminal facilities. There are terminal facilities at Aransas Pass, Port Arthur, Galveston, Port Isabel, and Brownsville. See Port Series No. 22 (revised 1988), Port Series No. 23 (revised 1996), Port Series No. 25 (revised 1983) and Port Series No. 26 (revised 1991), Corps of Engineers. Local interests constructed terminal facilities at Port Mansfield and Port Harlingen. There are numerous privately owned piers and wharves along the waterway. A 330-foot navigation district owned general cargo dock, a 770-foot private dock and a 760-foot private timber trestle have recently been completed at the upper end of the Channel to Victoria. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: - Channel to Victoria - The contract for dredging Stations 600+00 to 835+00 and constructing levees was awarded February 6, 1998, and continued through FY 1998 at a cost of $1,288,476. Sargent Beach - The contract to construct a concrete and rock barrier along an eight mile reach of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway at Sargent, Texas, awarded April 21, 1995, was completed in FY 1998 at a fiscal year cost of $5,575,010 of which $2,568,746 were Corps of Engineers funds and $3,006,264 were Inland Waterways Trust funds. Brazos River Floodgates - The major rehabilitation contract to replace the guidewalls at the east gate, awarded August 10, 1994, was financially completed in FY 1998 at a cost of $7,931 of which $3,966 were Corps of Engineers funds and $3,965 were Inland Waterways Trust funds. Aransas National Wildlife Refuge - A construction contract for placing concrete mats along Welder Flats, Reaches 1 through 19 of the Refuge area was awarded April 2, 1998 and continued through FY 98 at a cost of $2,002,551. Maintenance: - Main Channel and Tributaries - Routine maintenance. The cost incurred for 1998 for Dredged 40-6 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT Material Management Plans was as follows - GIWW, Corpus Christi Bay to Port Isabel $776,192; GIWW, High Island to Brazos River $62,733; GIWW, Brazos River to Port O'Connor $121,859; and GIWW, Port O'Connor to Corpus Christi $114,450. (See Table 40-J for dredging operations.) Aransas National Wildlife Refuge - No maintenance cost incurred for FY 1998 Brazos River Floodgates - The Brazos River Floodgates were operated and maintained at a cost of $825,682. A contract to replace mooring facilities was awarded September 26, 1997 and incurred an estimated cost of $1,092,247 in FY 98. Channel to Victoria - A contract for constructing bank stabilization and drainage structure Stations 490+72 to 493+77 was awarded September 26, 1997 and completed in FY 98 at a cost of $210,542. An archaeological service contract was awarded in FY 97 for Channel to Victoria Barge Canal, Calhoun County, Texas. The project consists of conducting full-scale data recovery (field excavations and extensive post-artifact processing, analysis, and project report preparation) investigations at prehistoric archaeological site 41CL59. Site 41 CL59 is an extensive prehistoric shell and earth midden with an occupation dating beginning about 400 B.C. and continuing up until A.D. 1000. The site measures 700 meters long by 100 meters wide, and is 10 to 25 feet thick, sandwiched stratigraphically within the adjoining terrace bluff overlooking the Barge Canal and the former Guadalupe River floodplain. Vast amount of lithics (stone dart and arrow points, knives, scrapers, awls, etc.), special perforated shell tools, ceramics, along with an extensive collection of faunal and floral material have been recovered from the site. In addition, rich features associated with the later historic Indian period and early Texan ranching settlers have also been recovered from this site. The project is being conducted by the Corps in compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and 36 CFR Part 800 regulations. The field work was initiated in FY 97 and continued through FY 98 at a cost of $200,002. Colorado River Locks - The Colorado River Locks were operated and maintained at a cost of $1,029,594. A contract to rehabilitate the east and west locks and boat basin, awarded September 26, 1997, incurred a cost of $2,994,504 for FY 98. Channel to Port Mansfield - In September 1997 a contract was awarded to repair the north and south jetties. The contract was completed in March 1998 with a fiscal year cost of $803,578. (See Table 40-J for dredging operations.) 8. HOUSTON-GALVESTON NAVIGATION CHANNELS, TX Location. Houston Ship Channel connects Galveston Harbor, at a point opposite Port Bolivar, with city of Houston, Texas, extending 50 miles northwesterly across Galveston Bay through San Jacinto River and Buffalo Bayou to a turning basin at head of Long Reach with light-draft channel 5 miles long from turning basin to Jensen Drive, Houston. The entrance to Galveston Harbor and Channel is on Gulf of Mexico on the northern portion of the Texas Coast. Galveston Channel extends from a point in Galveston Harbor between Bolivar Peninsula and Fort Point to and along wharf from Galveston, Texas and is about 5 miles long and 1,200 feet wide. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11324/5, 11327, 11328, and 11329.) Existing project. See Section 6, GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX and Section 9, HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX for project prior to October 1998. New authorized project provides for enlarging the Houston Ship Channel to a depth of 45 feet over a width which varies between 650 and 1,112 feet, and deepening the Galveston Harbor Channel to 47 feet over its original 800-foot width and 10.5 mile length; and extending the channel an additional 3.9 miles to the 47-foot bottom contour in the Gulf of Mexico along existing alignment. A dredged-material disposal plan, which would utilize confined or beneficial uses of dredged material in the bay and/or offshore disposal and 118 acres of Oyster mitigation is also provided in the project. Estimated cost for new work is: $322,048,000 Federal (Corps) which includes $81,352,000 for deferred environmental construction; $3,390,000 Federal (U.S. Coast Guard); and $116,422,000 non-Federal consisting of $57,765,000 cash, $689,000 lands, and $50,000 relocations for general navigation features; $8,387,000 for berthing areas; and $49,531,000 cash for environmental restoration which includes $27,117,000 for deferred environmental construction. (October 1, 1998 base price.) The plan for construction consist of nine reaches as follows: (1) Offshore Entrance Channel Extension, (IA) Offshore Jetty and Entrance Channel, (2) Galveston Channel, (3) Lower Bay, (4) Upper Bay, (5) Mid Bay, (6) Goat Island, (7) Upper Bayou, (8) Lower Bayou, and (9) Oyster Reef Mitigation. The first construction contract to dredge the Entrance Channel Extension was awarded August 7, 1998, and dredging began in December 1998. Local cooperation. Complied with for the completed work. For the Houston-Galveston Navigation Channels project, authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996, the cost-sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended, apply. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, roads and other facilities, except railroad bridges; pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; and pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep-draft navigation, during construction including in-kind work in connection with construction; and pay an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to navigation within a period of 30 years following completion if not offset by credit allowed for lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations. 40-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 The Port of Houston Authority and the City of Galveston are the sponsors for the project. A Project Cooperation Agreement with the Port of Houston Authority was executed on June 10, 1998. The Project Cooperation Agreement with the City of Galveston is pending. Terminal facilities. See Section 6, GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX and Section 9, HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction contract for dredging the Entrance Channel Extension was awarded August 7, 1998 and incurred an estimated cost of $500,000 for FY 98. A construction contract for dredging Lower Bay was awarded September 4, 1998, but work had not begun in FY 98. Also see Section 31, PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN. Maintenance: See Section 6, GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX and Section 9, HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX for maintenance of existing channels. (See Table 40-J for dredging operations.) 9. HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. Connects Galveston Harbor, at a point opposite Port Bolivar, with city of Houston, Texas, extending 50 miles northwesterly across Galveston Bay through San Jacinto River and Buffalo Bayou to a turning basin at head of Long Reach with light-draft channel 5 miles long from turning basin to Jensen Drive, Houston. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11324/5, 11327, 11328, and 11329.) Previous project. For details see page 1856 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in sections of the waterway shown in Table 40-H. Also provides for certain cut-offs, for easing sharp bends, an earthen dam across the upper end of Turkey Bend, and for off-channel silting basins as deemed necessary by the Chief of Engineers. Construction of 26,000 linear feet of pile dike to protect the channel in upper Galveston Bay was deauthorized by Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. The 40-foot project was completed in March 1966. Dredging a channel in Greens Bayou to Mile 1.57 was completed in 1970. Dredging Greens Bayou, Mile 1.57 to Mile 2.73, has been deauthorized. See Section 8, HOUSTON-GALVESTON NAVIGATION CHANNELS, TX an Section 31, PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN under Houston-Galveston Navigation Channels, TX, for work authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. (See Table 40-G for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1998.) Mean tidal range under ordinary conditions is 0.6 foot to 1.3 feet in lower part of Galveston Bay; 0.6 foot to 1.3 feet in upper bay; and 0.5 to 1 foot in San Jacinto River and Buffalo Bayou. Extreme ranges under ordinary conditions are about 2 feet, 1.2 feet and 1 foot, respectively. Freshets caused rises of over 12 feet in Buffalo Bayou; however, this condition has not occurred since completion of Addicks and Barker Dams for flood control on upper watershed of Buffalo Bayou. Height of tides is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season the water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for Houston Ship Channel. Local Cooperation Agreement for assumption of maintenance on Bayport Ship Channel was executed April 6, 1993. Local Cooperation Agreements for assumption of maintenance on Barbour Terminal Channel and Greens Bayou Channel were both executed on February 8, 1994. Terminal facilities. City of Houston and Port of Houston Authority operate modern terminals which supplement privately owned wharves, piers, and docks, as described in Port Series No. 24 (revised 1989), Corps of Engineers. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: See Section 8, HOUSTON-GALVESTON NAVIGATION CHANNELS, TX. Maintenance: Routine maintenance included mosquito control spraying at a cost of $47,773. (See Table 40-J for dredging operations.) See Section 8, HOUSTONGALVESTON NAVIGATION CHANNELS, TX and Section 31, PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN. 10. MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. This is a consolidation of shallow draft channel improvements of "Channel from Pass Cavallo to Port Lavaca, Texas," and deep draft channel improvements authorized under "Matagorda Ship Channel, Texas." Bar at Pass Cavallo is 125 miles southwest of Galveston entrance and 54 miles north of Aransas Pass. It connects Matagorda Bay with the gulf. Project extends across Matagorda Bay and Lavaca Bay to towns of Port Lavaca and Point Comfort. These two towns are on opposite sides of Lavaca Bay and both are about 26 miles northwest from Pass Cavallo. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11316.) Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins are listed in Table 40-H on channel dimensions. Project also provides for dual jetties at entrance, south jetty extending 6,000 feet to 24-foot depth in the gulf and north jetty extending 5,900 feet to 24-foot depth. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1 foot and extreme range about 2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season the water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. (See Table 40-G for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1998.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 40-8 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT Terminal facilities. Privately owned facilities at Port Lavaca, municipally owned facilities at mouth of Lynn bayou, privately owned and publicly owned facilities at Point Comfort, Texas. These facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Facilities at Point Comfort consist of a channel, turning basin with wharfs, oil dock and loading equipment, all owned by Aluminum Company of America; and a wharf built by local interest at Point Comfort turning basin. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine maintenance. (See Table 40-J for dredging operations.) 11. SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX Location. This is a consolidation of old improvements of "Harbor at Sabine Pass and Port Arthur Canal" and "Sabine-Neches Canal, including Sabine River to Orange and Neches River to Beaumont, Texas." Sabine Pass is on Gulf of Mexico about 58 miles east of Galveston and 280 miles west of Southwest Pass, Mississippi River. It connects Sabine Lake with gulf. Port Arthur canal extends 7 miles from near upper end of Sabine Pass to Port Arthur docks at mouth of Taylors Bayou. Near its upper end, Sabine-Neches canal joins and extends to mouths of Neches and Sabine Rivers. Waterway next extends up Neches River to Beaumont and up Sabine River to Orange. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11341,11342, and 11343.) Previous projects. For details see page 1863 of Annual Report for 1915, page 985 of Annual Report for 1916, and page 873 of Annual Report for 1926. Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins are set forth in Table 40-H on channel dimensions. Project also provides for two stone jetties at Sabine Pass entrance from the gulf, western jetty to be 21,905 feet long and eastern jetty 25,310 feet long. Project further provides for removal of guard lock in Sabine-Neches Canal, construction of suitable permanent protective works along Sabine Lake frontage owned by city of Port Arthur to prevent dredged material from entering Sabine Lake and to prevent erosion of material deposited, reconstruction of Port Arthur Bridge, and relocation of Port Arthur field office. Mean tidal variation at entrance is about 1.5 feet, at Port Arthur about 1 foot, and at Orange and Beaumont about 0.5 foot. Prolonged north winds during winter season have depressed water surface as much as 3.4 feet below mean low tide while tropical disturbances have caused heights as much as 8 feet above mean low tide. Existing project is complete. Removal of obstructive bridge at Port Arthur was completed May 1969. The high level fixed bridge across Sabine-Neches Canal was completed October 1970. Deepening project to 40 feet was completed April 1972. (See Table 40-G for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1998.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. See volume 2, Port Series No. 22 (revised 1988), Corps of Engineers. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine Maintenance. The contract to rehabilitate Placement Area No. 11, awarded June 17, 1996, was completed in FY 98 at a fiscal year cost of $783,928. A contract for archeology investigations of Channel to Red Bluff incurred a fiscal year cost of $35,993 for FY 98. Mosquito control spraying was performed in FY 98 for $16,089. (See Table 40-J for dredging operations.) 12. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX Location. Texas City is on the mainland of Texas on west side of Galveston Bay, about 10 miles northwest of city of Galveston. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11324/5.) Previous projects. For details see page 1856 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel 40 feet deep, 400 feet wide and about 6.75 miles long, from Bolivar Roads to a turning basin at Texas City, 40 feet deep, 1,000 feet to 1,200 feet wide and 4,253 feet long; and an Industrial Canal, 40 feet deep and 300-400 feet wide extending a distance of 1.7 miles southwestward from the south end of Texas City Turning Basin, and a turning basin, 40 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 1,150 feet long. Project also provides for easing the approach to the turning basin; a pile dike 28,200 feet long, parallel to and north of the channel; and a rubble-mound dike, 27,600 feet long, along the southerly side of the pile dike. The 40-foot channel was completed in June 1967. Widening the Texas City Turning Basin; realigning the Texas City Turning Basin to a location 85 feet easterly from its present position; and enlargement through widening and deepening of the Industrial Canal and basins was initiated in July 1980 and completed in June 1982. The only work remaining is deferred construction consisting of widening the Industrial Canal from 250 feet to 300 feet at 40 foot depth. Work authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986 would modify the project by providing for deepening the Texas City Turning Basin to 50 feet, enlarging the 6.7-mile long Texas City Channel to 50 feet by 600 feet, deepening the existing 800-foot wide Bolivar Roads Channel and Inner Bar Channel to 50 feet, deepening the existing 800-foot wide Outer Bar and Galveston Entrance Channel to a 52-foot depth for 4.1 miles at a width of 800 feet and an additional reach at a width of 600 feet to the 52 foot contour in the Gulf of Mexico. Establishment of 600 acres of wetland and development of water-oriented recreational facilities on a 90-acre enlargement of the Texas City Dike are also proposed. The project is currently in the "deferred" category. (See Table 40-G for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1998.) 40-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.3 feet and extreme range is about 2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on the wind and during strong "northers" water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is $123,300,000 Federal (Corps), excluding expenditures on previous projects, and $74,393,700 non-Federal, including $62,027,741 contributed funds, $248,000 work contribution, $427,959 lands, $10,737,000 levees and spillways, $6,000 for removal of barge mooring facilities from Shoal Point (formerly known as Snake Island), $561,000 for berthing areas, and $386,000 relocations. (October 1, 1988 base price.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. For work authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended, local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and disposal areas; relocate utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges; provide berthing areas; pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation facilities, and, during construction, pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep-draft navigation to a depth of 45 feet plus 50 percent of the costs allocated to deep-draft navigation deeper than 45 feet; pay an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to deep-draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion if not offset by credit allowed for lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations and disposal areas; and pay 50 percent of the costs incurred for operation and maintenance below the 45- foot depth. Terminal facilities. Privately owned terminal facilities are on the mainland at inner end of this channel and are considered adequate for existing commerce. A deep-draft channel and turning basin extend about 1.9 miles southwestward from south end of Texas City Turning Basin have been constructed by local interests. See Port Series No. 23 (revised 1996), Corps of Engineers. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: See Section 31, PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN. Maintenance: Routine Maintenance. (See Table 40-J for dredging operations.) 13. TRINITY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Location. The main stem of the Trinity River is formed at Dallas by the confluence of the West Fork and the Elm Fork at river mile 505.5. The mouth of the Trinity is about one-half mile west of Anahuac, Texas. (See Geological Survey base map, Texas, scale 1:500,000.) Previous project. For details of abandoned locks and dam construction see page 986 of Annual Report for 1933. Existing project. See individual detailed reports on Anahuac Channel, Channel to Liberty and Wallisville Lake. Project includes the existing Federal project designated as "Mouth of Trinity River, Texas," which was completed in 1907 at a cost of $80,000 (no cost to local interest). Project is not being maintained. (See Table 40-G for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1998.) Local cooperation. See individual detailed reports on Channel to Liberty and Wallisville Lake. There is no local cooperation required for Anahuac Channel. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and piers at Anahuac, Moss Bluff, Wallisville, and Liberty, Texas, are adequate for existing commerce. 13A. ANAIUAC CHANNEL, TX Location: Extends from 6-foot depth in Galveston Bay to Anahuac, Texas, opposite mouth of Trinity River 38 miles north of Galveston, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11323.) Existing project. No project dimensions authorized by 1905 River and Harbor Act. A 6- by 80-foot channel, 16,000 feet long was dredged in 1905. At present a 6- by 100-foot channel is maintained. Under ordinary conditions tidal range is 0.6 to 1.2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on wind. Strong north winds depress water surface 1.5 feet below mean sea level. Latest published map is in House Document 440, 56th Congress, 1st Session. Project was completed in 1911. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and piers are the only terminal facilities at Anahuac. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: No work was incurred during the fiscal year. 13B. CHANNEL TO LIBERTY, TX Location. Improvement is located in Galveston Bay and tidal reach of lower Trinity River. (See Geological Survey Maps for Anahuac, Cove, Moss Bluff, and Liberty, Texas.) Previous projects. For details see page 986 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. Provides for a 6-foot channel from Anahuac to Liberty which was completed in 1925. A navigable channel from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston Bay to Liberty, Texas, with depth of 9 feet and width of 150 feet, extending along the east shore of Trinity Bay to the mouth of the Trinity River at Anahuac, thence in the river channel to a turning basin at Liberty, Texas, and a protective embankment along the west side of the channel in Trinity Bay. The 6-foot Channel to Liberty was completed in 1925. The 9-foot Channel to Liberty has been dredged from junction with Houston Ship Channel to a point one mile below Anahuac, Texas. Work remaining consists of dredging a 9- by 150-foot channel from one mile below Anahuac, Texas to Liberty, Texas. 40-10 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fully complied with for portion of "Channel to Liberty" between Houston Ship Channel and 1 mile below Anahuac, Texas, as required by 1946 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 634, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess.), but not complied with for remaining portion of "Channel to Liberty" as required by River and Harbor Act of 1945 (H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess.). Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and docks at Anahuac, Wallisville, Texas Gulf Sulphur Co.'s slip, Moss Bluff and Liberty, Texas, are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine maintenance. (See Table 40-J for dredging operations.) 13C. WALLISVILLE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is at river mile 3.9, about 4 miles northwest of Anahuac, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11323.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a dam and overflow spillway approximately 8 miles long to prevent salinity intrusion and create a 3,800 acre reservoir. The maximum pool elevation will be 2 feet above National Geodetic Vertical Datum. (The reservoir was reduced from 5600 acres with a maximum pool elevation of 4 feet N.G.V.D. by agreement to protect the endangered bald eagle.) Project provides for an 84 foot by 600-foot navigation lock to facilitate navigation on Channel to Liberty. The sill has a depth of minus 16 feet below National Geodetic Vertical Datum. Project also provides for two recreational areas; and three water control structures to control salinity intrusion and regulate freshwater flows to the saltwater marsh west of the river. Dam controls a drainage area of 1,262 square miles below Livingston Dam (non-Federal project at channel mile 99.2) and has a storage capacity of 14,000 acre-feet. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range in bay is from 0.6 foot to 1.2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on wind. Strong northerly winds depress water surface 1.5 feet below mean sea level. Total estimated cost of authorized project is $78,000,000 Federal (Corps). (October 1, 1997 base price.) A contract for construction of access road, Big Hog intake structure, intake canal and access bridge was completed in October 1968. Work started in July 1970 on construction of the lock and dam, roads, diversion channel, and navigation channel. Work was suspended in February 1973 because of an injunction halting construction. Protective work on the lock and dam was permitted and was completed in April 1973. An exception to the injunction was granted for plugging oil wells which was completed in August 1973. Notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit was filed in April 1973. In August 1974, the Court of Appeals reversed the judgment and remanded the case with directions that a revised or supplemental statement be prepared and judged anew. Final supplement to the Environmental Impact Statement for the modified project authorized in the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1983 (PL 98-63) was submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency on September 21, 1983. In March 1986, the Court rendered its Memorandum of order continuing the injunction and directing the Corps to recommence the administrative process at the time when the first departure from standard NEPA procedures occurred prior to the 1983 legislative action. The Corps and Local Sponsors perfected an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals and on May 11, 1987, the Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the Corps and dismissed the suit in its entirety. The Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1991 provided $9,200,000 for the project and directive language for continuation of construction. In the fall of 1989, a pair of bald eagles were discovered nesting at the project site which led to additional consultation under the Endangered Species Act. Solicitation of the contract for the non-overflow dam was postponed to allow for environmental coordination. An Environmental Assessment was prepared with a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) which was signed in September 1991. Environmental documents were approved and construction was resumed. Work remaining consist of design and construction of lock rehabilitation; gated navigation channel; controlled spillway and bridge; and three water control structures. Local cooperation. Local interest must contribute an amount equal to cost allocated to water supply, one-half of cost allocated to salinity control and cost allocated to recreation less cost of basic facilities and less 15 percent of total project cost. Local interest reimbursement is estimated at $10,500,000. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The architect/engineering contract, awarded April 4, 1994 to prepare plans and specifications and cost estimates for lock rehabilitation and construction of new facilities, completed the design in 1996 and continued through FY 1998 providing construction phase services at a cost of $57,566. Architect/engineering contract awarded September 20, 1995, to design Structure A, provide construction phase services and reestablish property boundary lines, continued through Fiscal Year 1998 at a cost of $35,643. The construction contract for lock rehabilitation and construction of new facilities was awarded December 22, 1995 and continued through FY 1998 at a cost of $7,800,000. The contract includes rehabilitation and completion of the navigation lock, completion of the North and South navigation channels, construction of a new administration/resident office building, and electrical and mechanical equipment controls for the controlled spillway structure. Maintenance: Ranger surveillance, administration of project, and administration of duck blind permit program were conducted. Routine maintenance included mosquito 40-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 control spraying at a cost of $7,080. 14. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Reconnaissance and condition surveys were conducted in FY 1998 at a total cost of $45,576. The surveys were on the following projects: Channel to Red Bluff Feb 98 Double Bayou Mar 98 Clear Creek Jun 98 15. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization): Initial coordination for Section 107 navigation activities was performed in FY 98 at a cost of $7,513. Mitigation of shore damages attributable to navigation projects pursuant to Section 111, Public Law 90-483: No mitigation of shore damages studies were performed in FY 98. Shore Protection 16. CORPUS CHRISTI BEACH, TX (RESTORATION PROJECT) Location. Corpus Christi Beach, a shore area having a length of about 2 miles, is located on the west side of Corpus Christi Bay in Nueces County at Corpus Christi, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11309 and 11311.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provided for initial restoration of eroded areas of Corpus Christi Beach, over a shore length of 1.4 miles, located on the easterly side of Rincon Peninsula, with periodic nourishment as required. Construction was completed in March 1978. Periodic nourishment and construction of sand retention groin was completed in November 1985. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Section 934 of Water Resources Development Act of 1986 provides for extension of nourishment period to 50 years for beach nourishment projects. A study to determine the appropriateness of such an extended nourishment period for the Federal beach nourishment project was completed. The study indicated that there was no economic justification for continued Federal participation in the program. The responsibility for beach monitoring and maintenance was transferred to the City of Corpus Christi in July 1990. Flood Control 17. BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Location. Improvements are on Buffalo Bayou watershed, a part of San Jacinto River watershed, in Harris County, west and northwest of city of Houston, Texas. (See Geological Survey quadrangle sheets for Harris County.) Existing project. Provides for improvements of Buffalo Bayou and its tributaries above turning basin of Houston Ship Channel to control floods for protection of city of Houston, and prevent deposition of silt in turning basin of ship channel by construction of detention reservoirs, enlargement and rectification of channels and construction of control works. Channel rectification on Brays Bayou with an improved channel length 25.4 miles was completed in March 1971. Channel rectification on White Oak Bayou was completed in 1976. Work remaining consists of rectification of approximately 22 miles of main stem of Buffalo Bayou. See individual detailed reports on Addicks and Barker Reservoirs; and Brays, Greens, Halls, Hunting, Little White Oak, and Carpenters Bayous. Local cooperation. Section 203, 1954 Flood Control Act applies. Local interests have accomplished all required local cooperation on Brays Bayou and White Oak Bayou. On Buffalo Bayou, local interests purchased interests that the United States had in 7 miles of rectified channel below Barker and Addicks Dams for $256,651. Of the remaining required rights-of-way on Buffalo Bayou, local interests have acquired about 40 percent. About 53 percent of required bridge relocations and 3 percent of the required bridge relocations have been accomplished. Advance of $4,400,000 by the Harris County Flood Control District was refunded in September 1956. Public Law 86-53 authorized reimbursement of $38,726 to Galveston, Houston and Henderson Railroad Company for bridge alterations at Brays Bayou. Non- Federal contributions totaled $63,661 for project betterment. Recreation development is subject to conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. See individual detailed reports on Addicks and Barker Reservoirs; and Brays, Greens, Halls, Hunting, Little White Oak, and Carpenters Bayous. 17A. ADDICKS AND BARKER RESERVOIRS, TX Location. Reservoirs are located in and west of the City of Houston in Harris and Fort Bend Counties, Texas. Existing project. Construction of Barker Dam was complete in February 1945. Construction of Addicks Dam and 7.4 miles of channel rectification downstream from Addicks and Barker Dams was completed in October 1948. 40-12 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT Modification of Barker and Addicks Dams consisting of gating of two uncontrolled conduits in each dam, was complete in 1969. Major rehabilitation of Addicks and Barker Dams to prevent seepage through the embankment was completed in 1982. Work under the Dam Safety Assurance program was initiated in Fiscal Year 1986. Work accomplished included raising approximately 32,400 feet of Addicks Dam 1 to 3 feet and raising approximately 57,600 feet of Barker Dam 3 to 5 feet and armor-plating low ends of both dams. A contract with the city of Houston for cost-sharing in the construction of recreation facilities was entered into in November 1981. The lease for approximately 10,534 acres of land and water areas was approved in February 1983. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Recreation: Community Park West (Phase IB) and the velodrome were completed in November 1986. Grading and clearing for an archery range was performed by the City of Houston in March and April 1987. Work on Community Park West (Phase 4) by the City of Houston was completed in 1992, as was the development of Community Park 2 (soccer fields, ball fields, and parking lots) by Harris County Precinct 3 in Cullen-Barker Park. Additional playground equipment was installed in Bear Creek Park, Addicks Reservoir, by Harris County Precinct 3. The Fort Bend County YMCA built a pavilion, archery range, and nature trails in Barker Reservoir. Maintenance and improvements of these recreation areas continues. Maintenance: Construction contract for repairs and rehabilitation to Barker ditch and dam outfall was awarded April 9, 1997 and continued through FY 98 at a cost of $1,336,989. Road repairs to Barker Dam and Addicks Dam for FY 98 cost $292,237 and a decrease of $17,237, respectively. A contract for rehabilitation and repairs to the outlet works at Addicks and Barker Dams was awarded September 15, 1997. Fiscal year costs for 1998 were $1,080,206. 17B. BRAYS BAYOU, TX Location. The project is located in the south-central portion of Buffalo Bayou, Harris County, TX. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 3 miles of stream improvements, 3 flood detention basins, and 7 miles of stream diversion channels. Aesthetic vegetation is included. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, sports fields, comfort stations and parking areas. The estimated cost for new work is $243,665,000 Federal (Corps) and $152,506,000 non-Federal consisting of $21,940,000 cash contributions, and $130,566,000 for lands and relocations (October 1998 base price). Location cooperation. Local Sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local Sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-ofway; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $21,940,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). The Local Sponsor was authorized to develop the project and design and construct an alternative to the diversion component and be reimbursed for the Federal share by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (PL 104- 303). See Section 31, PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN. 17C. GREENS BAYOU, TX Location. The project is located in the north-central portion of Buffalo Bayou, Harris County, TX, and does not include the Halls Bayou tributary. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 25 miles of stream enlargements, 14 miles of stream clearing and 4 flood detention basins. Aesthetic vegetation and mitigation is included. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, sports fields, launches, ramps, comfort stations and parking areas. The estimated cost for new work is $149,855,000 Federal (Corps) and $93,776,000 non-Federal consisting of $14,360,000 cash contributions, and $79,416,000 for lands and relocations (October 1998 base price). Local cooperation. Local Sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local Sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $14,360,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). See Section 31, PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN. 17D. HALLS BAYOU, TX Location. Halls Bayou is a major tributary of Greens Bayou, located in the north-central portion of Buffalo Bayou, Harris County, TX. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 18 miles of stream improvements. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, boat ramps, a comfort station and parking areas. The estimated cost for new work is $66,141,000 Federal (Corps) and $50,321,000 non-Federal consisting of $7,439,000 cash contributions, and $42,882,000 for lands and relocations (October 1998 base price). Local cooperation. Local Sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local Sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads 40-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $7,439,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). Project is awaiting Pre-construction Engineering and Design funds. 17E. HUNTING BAYOU, TX Location. Hunting Bayou is located in Houston, approximately 4 to 5 miles from the central business district. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 14.3 miles of stream improvements. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, a comfort station and parking areas. The estimated cost for new work is $65,313,000 Federal (Corps) and $59,583,000 non-Federal consisting of $6,675,000 cash contributions, and $52,908,000 for lands and relocations (October 1998 base price). Local cooperation. Local Sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local Sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $6,675,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). The Local Sponsor was authorized to design and construct an alternative to the project and be reimbursed for the Federal share by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (PL 104-303). See Section 31, PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN. 17F. LITTLE WHITE OAK BAYOU, TX Location. Little White Oak Bayou is a tributary of White Oak Bayou in north-central Houston. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 6.0 miles of stream enlargements. Recreation facilities include trails and picnic facilities. The estimated cost for new work is $17,958,000 Federal (Corps) and $17,957,000 non-Federal consisting of $1,996,000 cash contributions, and $15,961,000 for lands and relocations (October 1990 base price). Local cooperation. Local Sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local Sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $1,996,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). Project is awaiting Pre-construction Engineering and Design funds. 17G. CARPENTERS BAYOU, TX Location. Carpenters Bayou is a tributary of Buffalo Bayou in northeastern Houston. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 9.7 miles of stream enlargements. Recreation facilities include trails and picnic facilities. The estimated cost for new work is $3,900,000 Federal (Corps) and $1,950,000 non-Federal consisting of $370,000 cash contributions, and $2,320,000 for lands and relocations (October 1990 base price). Local cooperation. Local Sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local Sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $370,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). Project is awaiting Pre-construction Engineering and Design funds. 18. BUFFALO BAYOU, TX (LYNCHBURG PUMP STATION) Location. The project is located 10 miles east of Houston, Texas near the entrance to the Houston Ship Channel. Existing project. The Lynchburg Pump Station is to be protected by a flood barrier encircling the facility. A plan consisting of a combination sheet pile wall and earth levee is recommended. Total barrier length is approximately 2000 feet. The Crosby-Lynchburg Road will be rerouted to the top of the levee. Local cooperation. The Coastal Water Authority, owned by the City of Houston, is the Local Sponsor of the project. Operation during the fiscal year. The Detailed Project Study was underway throughout FY 1996 and completed in September 1996. An implementation plan in the amount of $5,985,000 has been tentatively agreed upon by the Local Sponsor, subject to approval by higher authority of the Corps of Engineers. Construction could be initiated in late FY 1999 if funds are available. 19. CLEAR CREEK, TX Location. The project is located about midway between the two metropolitan centers of Houston, Texas, on the north and Galveston-Texas City on the south in 40-14 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT Harris and Galveston Counties above and below existing Clear Lake. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of an improved channel from Mile 3.8 to Mile 34.8 to contain within its banks all flood flows up to and including that of a 100-year flood. The selected plan provides channel enlargement and easing of bends within the existing stream from Mile 3.8 to Mile 26.05 to contain at least the 10-year frequency storm, and additional outlet with gated structure from Clear Lake to Galveston Bay, restriction of development in the residual 100-year flood plain and measures to mitigate environmental effects. In 1986, at the request of Brazoria County Drainage District No. 4, that portion of the project upstream of the Brazoria/ Galveston County line, approximate improved Mile 19.1, was placed in the "inactive" category. Estimated cost for new work, excluding "inactive" portion, is $70,063,000 Federal (Corps) and $53,795,000 non-Federal consisting of $6,192,000 cash contributions, $22,600,000 for lands, and $25,003,000 for relocations (October 1, 1998 base price). Environmental interest groups and agencies, private citizens, and some local communities located near or adjacent to Clear Lake expressed opposition to the Clear Creek Flood Control Project as currently authorized and planned for upstream reaches. In general, the opposition to the project has been focused on environmental concerns in the upstream reaches and on induced flooding concerns downstream in Clear Lake. Construction has been delayed at the request of the Local Sponsor so that an alternative to the authorized project can be developed that will reduce above concerns and still provide flood protection to those that are critically affected by flood waters in the watershed. Local cooperation. Local Sponsors for the project are Galveston and Harris counties. The Local Cooperation Agreement, executed June 30, 1986, requires local interests to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and material disposal areas; modify or relocate building, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary in the construction of the project; make a cash contribution for mitigation measures consistent with the non-Federal share of total project costs without mitigation measures; pay five percent of the total costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation and maintenance of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The construction contract for dredging the Second Outlet Channel, awarded July 23, 1996, was fimancially completed in FY 98. The District has been reviewing the Local Sponsor's alternative plan, which the Sponsor developed in 1997 during a reevaluation period involving public input. Studies of the hydrological impacts to Clear Lake and of contaminant impacts continued, and are scheduled for completion in December 1998. 20. CYPRESS CREEK, TX Location. The project is located north of Houston, Texas in Harris County. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of enlargement of the lower 29.4 miles of the Cypress Creek Channel, incorporating grassed side slopes and channel bottom and appropriate erosion control measures; application of floodplain management techniques in the residual floodplain; construction of project-oriented recreation features, including 11.5 miles of hike-and-bike trails and related facilities for health, safety, and public access; and habitat management measures on 844 acres of Harris County Parkway land, creation of wooded and brush habitat along 100 acres of the project right-of-way, acquisition of 329 acres of wildlife habitat along the creek, and creation of 35 acres of ponds and marshes. The authorized plan is no longer under consideration. The current plan is to buy out or raise houses where inhabitants are at or below the five year flood level. Estimated cost for the new plan is $9,701,000 Federal (Corps) and $3,234,000 non-Federal contribution. (October 1, 1998 base price.) Local cooperation. Local Sponsor for the project is Harris County. The non-Federal share of the cost of non-structural flood control measures shall be 25 percent of the cost of such measures. The non-Federal interests for any such measures shall be required to provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations necessary for the project, but shall not be required to contribute any amount in cash during construction of the project. Operations during fiscal year. See Section 31, PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN. 21. LOWER RIO GRANDE BASIN, TX Location. The project is located in Willacy, Hidalgo, and Cameron Counties. The basin is bounded on the east by the Gulf of Mexico, on the south by the Rio Grande which forms the international boundary between the United States and Mexico, on the west by Starr County, and on the north by Brooks and Kenedy Counties. Existing project. See individual detailed reports on Arroyo Colorado, South Main Channel, and Raymondville Drain. Local cooperation. See individual detailed reports on Arroyo Colorado, South Main Channel, and Raymondville Drain. 21A. ARROYO COLORADO, TX Location. The project is located in Hidalgo and Cameron Counties, Texas. Existing project. The authorized project will provide flood protection along Highway 83 and erosion protection for the banks of the Arroyo Colorado in the city of 40-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Harlingen. The project consists of a gated water control structure, 1.4 miles of channel improvements, and stone armoring of selected reaches in Harlingen. The estimated cost for new work is $5,851,000 Federal (Corps) and $1,951,000 non-Federal consisting of $1,848,000 cash and $103,000 for lands and relocations (October 1, 1993 base prices). The project has reached a stalemate as the Local Sponsor, the Hidalgo County Drainage District #1, can not provide required guarantee to hold and save the Government free from all damages arising from the construction, operation, maintenance, repair and replacement for the project, nor are they able to operate and maintain the project when completed. The International Boundary and Water Commission has complete jurisdiction over the project as it is one of the elements of the Rio Grande Floodway System. The Commission is interested in the project but only if additional funds to do operations and maintenance are provided. Legislative approval will be required to alter the current status. Local cooperation. Local Sponsor, the Hidalgo County Drainage District #1, is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $1,848,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. None. 21B. SOUTH MAIN CHANNEL, TX Location. The project is located in Hidalgo and Willacy Counties, Texas. Existing project. The authorized project consists of channel improvements which will provide flood protection to the cities of McAllen, Edinburg, Edcouch, La Villa and Lyford, as well as the rural areas of Hidalgo and Willacy Counties north of U.S. Highway 83. The estimated cost for new work is $124,509,000 Federal (Corps) and $69,731,000 non-Federal consisting of $9,712,000 cash and $28,107,000 lands and $31,912,000 relocations (October 1, 1998 base prices). Local cooperation. Local Sponsors for the project are Hidalgo County Drainage District #1 and Willacy County Drainage District #1. Local Sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $9,712,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: See Section 31, PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN. 21C. RAYMONDVILLE DRAIN, TX Location. The project is located in northern Hidalgo and Willacy Counties, Texas. Existing project. The authorized project will provide a drainage outlet to the Laguna Madre for northern Hidalgo and Willacy Counties. The project consists of 43.8 miles of channel work, including enlargement of existing channels and construction of new channels, a 3.88-mile long levee, and diversion ditches along the west side of Raymondville. The estimated cost for new work is $56,708,000 Federal (Corps) and $19,521,000 non-Federal consisting of $6,102,000 cash and $6,142,000 lands and $7,277,000 relocations (October 1, 1998 base prices). Local cooperation. Local Sponsor for the project is Hidalgo County Drainage District #1 and Willacy County Drainage District #1. Local Sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $6,102,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: See Section 31, PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN. 22. SIMS BAYOU, TX Location. The project is located in Harris County, in the southern portion of Houston, Texas. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement provides for enlargement and rectification, with appropriate erosion control measures, of 19.3 miles of Sims Bayou to provide 25-year flood protection; environmental measures and riparian habitat improvement along the entire alignment; and recreational development to include 27 miles of hike-and-bike trails connecting to existing public parks, together with picnic, playground, and other leisure facilities. Estimated cost for new work is $206,422,000 Federal (Corps) and $104,891,000 non- Federal consisting of $18,274,000 cash contributions, $39,988,000 for lands, $46,377,000 for relocations and $292,000 for channels (October 1, 1998 base price). Local cooperation. Local Sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. In accordance with the cost-sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local interests are required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary for the construction of the project; pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation facilities; and pay 5 percent of the costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. The Local Cooperation Agreement for 40-16 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT flood control was executed on October 19, 1990. The recreation Local Cooperation Agreement is pending. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract for channel rectification from Interstate Highway 45 to Reveille Park, awarded January 28, 1994, was physically completed November 2, 1996, an incurred no cost for FY 98. Construction contract for channel rectification from Hemingway Drive to Reveille Park, awarded December 22, 1994, continued through FY 1998 at a cost of $103,051. The construction contract for channel rectification from Swallow to Hemingway was awarded July 19, 1996, and continued in FY 1998 with a cost of $1,902,973. Surveys were performed by contract in connection with plans and specifications for the Mykawa to Cullen reach and the Cullen to State Highway 288 reach at a cost of $33,226 and $46,601 respectively for FY 1998. An architect/ engineering contract was awarded in FY 97 for preparation of the feature design memorandum on the Hiram Clarke to End reach. Cost incurred for FY 98 was $6,953. Construction contract for channel rectification from Swallow to Mykawa was awarded November 20, 1997, and work continued through FY 98 at a cost of $2,112,537. A contract to construct a new storm drain and repair seven storm drain outlets in the Reveille Park to 1-45 reach was awarded September 18, 1997, and incurred a cost of $124,970 in FY 98. A contract for flood damage repair for Reveille Park to 1-45, awarded February 27, 1998, incurred a cost of $69,970 for fiscal year 1998. An Easement and Indemnity Agreement for modification of the Manchester Bulkhead was executed July 1, 1997. Remedial design and construction of the bulkhead at Manchester Terminal Corporation were completed June 8, 1998, and payment for $1,488,367 was made in FY 98. An Easement and Indemnity Agreement for modification of the Valero Bulkhead was executed February 19, 1998. Design and construction of the bulkhead at Valero Refining Company was completed in March 8, 1999, and an accrual for $1,140,875 was made inFY 98. Reimbursement was made to the Local Sponsor, Harris County Flood Control District, for their work on the reach from Port Terminal Railroad to Interstate Highway 45, in the amount of $300,000. 23. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL WORKS Inspections of completed projects operated and maintained by local interests were made on the following projects. Fiscal year cost was $158,207. Project Colorado River Flood Protection at Matagorda, TX Guadalupe River Removal of Log Jams, TX - Flood Control Date of Project Inspection Texas City Hurricane Flood Protection, TX April 1998 Trout Creek Flood Protection at Kirbyville, TX April 1998 Taylors Bayou, TX - Flood Protection May 1998 Port Arthur, TX-Hurricane Flood Protection June 1998 Lavaca and Navidad Rivers, TX Flood Protection at Halletsville Dam August 1998 Galveston Harbor & Channel, TX - Seawall and Groins September 1998 24. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205 of 1970 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended: Initial coordination for Section 205 Flood Control activities was performed in FY 98 at a cost of $9,585. Construction of the flood protection project for Buffalo Bayou, Texas (Lynchburg Pump Station) is discussed in Section 18. An initial appraisal for flood protection at Pin Oak Creek at Kirbyville, Texas was initiated in FY 98 at a fiscal year cost of $4,648. Emergency flood control - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation): Disaster Preparedness cost for Fiscal Year 1998 was $320,214. National Emergency Preparedness Program fiscal year cost was $86,958. Emergency Operations FY 98 cost was $69,499 for the District's response to Tropical Storm Frances, a system that dumped heavy rain on parts of Texas and Louisiana from September 11-12th, 1998. The tropical storm also brought surge levels to over five feet along the Texas coast and inland bays. Three counties were declared under a Federal Disaster Declaration: Galveston, Brazoria and Harris. 25. EMERGENCY STREAM BANK AND SHORELINE EROSION WORK AND SNAGGING AND CLEARING ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Date of Stream bank and shoreline erosion activities pursuant Inspection to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 525, as amended: January 1998 January 1998 Initial coordination for stream bank and shoreline erosion activities were performed in FY 98 at a cost of $14,353. 40-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Snagging and clearing activities for flood control pursuant to Section 208 of the Flood Control Act of 1954, Public Law 780, as amended: No new feasibility studies of snagging and clearing activities for flood control improvements were performed in Fiscal Year 1998. Environmental Restoration 26. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT Project modifications for improvement of environment activities pursuant to Section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, as amended: Construction of the environmental restoration project at Laguna Madre, Texas is discussed in Section 27. Plans and specifications and environmental documentation were completed in FY 1996 for restoration of the wetlands at Barker Reservoir for a waterfowl habitat. Project title is Addicks and Barker Waterfowl Habitat Restoration, Texas. Project is awaiting approval of the Project Cooperation Agreement. 27. LAGUNA MADRE SEAGRASS PROJECT Location. The project is located in Laguna Madre about 7 miles north of Port Isabel, Texas in Cameron County. Existing project. The objective of the proposed project is to determine whether unconfined open-bay disposal operations can be modified to increase the seagrass colonization rate between dredging cycles and improve habitat value for estuarine fauna in the disposal area. The work consists of transplanting seagrass from nearby undisturbed seagrass meadows onto freshly deposited dredged maintenance material in two openbay disposal areas near the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. The transplanted seagrass and control sites will be sampled and monitored for various physical and biological parameters to determine the success of the demonstration project in restoring fish habitat in the disposal areas. Local cooperation. The Local Sponsor for this project is the Texas Department of Transportation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on October 6, 1994. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was financially completed in accordance with the applicable cost-sharing requirements. The cost incurred for FY 1998 was $15,487. General Investigations 28. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs for reconnaissance studies were $179,008 for navigation and $29,042 for flood damage prevention. Reconnaissance and feasibility studies on review of authorized projects incurred costs of $1,741,224 for FY 1998. Miscellaneous Activities for FY 98 include the following: Special Investigations at a cost of $18,390; Interagency Water Resources Development at $8,995; National Estuary Program at $4,861; and National Marine Fisheries Service at a cost of $34. 29. COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES Cost for Coordination With Other Agencies was $3,063 for FY 1998. 30. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Floodplain management, technical services and quick responses were performed at a cost of $39,666, $79,531, and $3,984, respectively. Hydrologic studies cost $9,242. Floodplain management services were completed for the Alabama-Coushatta Indian Tribe at Big Sandy, Texas for a fiscal year cost of $4,960. 31. PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Aransas National Wildlife Refuge, Texas _The project will provide erosion protection and limited spill containment for the existing alignment of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway (GIWW) along a 31-mile reach of the GIWW which crosses the critical wintering habitat of the rare and endangered whooping crane. The project includes a 13.25-mile reach within the boundary of the Aransas National Wildlife Refuge. The dredged material management plan includes marsh creation with the beneficial uses of dredged material. Total planning and engineering costs were $1,850,300. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1995 and completed in FY 1998. Fiscal year costs were $274,404. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 and construction began in 1998. See Section 7, GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, TX, Aransas National Wildlife Refuge. Houston-Galveston Navigation Channels, Texas - The project was authorized for construction by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. The total project provides for enlarging the Houston Ship Channel to a depth of 45 feet and a width of 530 feet, and the Galveston Channel to a depth of 45 feet over a width 40-18 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT which varies between 650 and 1112 feet, and deepening the Galveston Harbor Channel to 47 feet over its original 800-foot width and 10.5 mile length, and extending the channel an additional 3.9 miles to the 47-foot bottom contour in the Gulf of Mexico along the existing alignment. Dredged material will be used for construction of environmental restoration sites to include approximately 118 acres of oyster cultch, 4,250 acres of marsh, and 12 acres of bird island. Total planning and engineering costs were $19,042,800 Federal and $1,020,000 non-Federal. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1990. Fiscal year costs were $81,414 (Federal) and $234,666 was expended from Sponsor contributed funds. The project was authorized by the Water Resources and Development Act of 1996 and construction began in 1998. See Section 8, HOUSTON GALVESTON NAVIGATION CHANNELS. Brays Bayou, Texas - The project will provide for 3 miles of stream improvements, 3 flood detention basins, and 7 miles of stream diversion channels. Aesthetic vegetation is included. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, sports fields, comfort stations and parking areas. Total planning and engineering costs were $4,004,061. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1990 and completed in FY 1998. Fiscal year costs were $12,353. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 and construction funds were received in FY 1998. See Section 17B, BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, BRAYS BAYOU, TX. Greens Bayou, Texas - The project will provide for 25 miles of stream enlargements, 14 miles of stream clearing and 4 flood detention basins. Aesthetic vegetation and mitigation is included. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, sports fields, launches, ramps, comfort stations and parking areas. Estimated planning and engineering cost is $5,900,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1990. Fiscal year costs were $912,515. Cypress Creek, Texas - The project will provide for enlargement of the lower 29.4 miles of the channel. Project-oriented recreation features include 11.5 miles of hike-and-bike trails and related recreation facilities, habitat management measures on 844 acres of Harris County Parkway project land, creation of wooded and brush habitat along 100 acres of project right-of-way, acquisition of 329 acres of wildlife habitat, and creation of 35 acres of ponds and marshes. The authorized plan is no longer under consideration. The current plan is to buy out or raise houses where inhabitants are at or below the five year flood level. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $3,455,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1990. Fiscal year costs were $221,524. South Main Channel, Texas - The project consists of channel improvements which will provide flood protection to the cities of McAllen, Edinburg, Edcouch, La Villa and Lyford, as well as the rural areas of Hidalgo and Willacy Counties north of U.S. Highway 83. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $6,650,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1990. Fiscal year costs were $843,968. Neches River and Tributaries, Salt Water Barrier, Texas - The project consists of a tainter gated salt water barrier structure, a gated navigation bypass channel, an access road and levee, and an auxiliary dam across an associated canal. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $5,780,000. A review of the project economics was completed in FY 1994. Fiscal year costs were $1,455,003. Texas City Channel, Texas - Work authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 would modify the existing 40-foot project by providing for deepening the Texas City Turning Basin to 50 feet, enlarging the 6.7 mile long Texas City Channel to 50 feet by 600 feet, deepening the existing 800-foot wide Bolivar Roads Channel and Inner Bar Channel to 50 feet, deepening the existing 800-foot wide Outer Bar and Galveston Entrance Channel to a 52-foot depth for 4.1 miles at a width of 800 feet and an additional reach at a width of 600 feet to the 52 foot contour in the Gulf Mexico. Establishment of 600 acres of wetland and development of water-oriented recreational facilities on a 90-acre enlargement of the Texas City Dike are also proposed. The project was placed in the deferred category in 1989 at the request of the project sponsor, the City of Texas City. By letter dated, March 10, 1997, the City of Texas City requested the project be reactivated. A project review and assessment was prepared to justify removal from the deferred category. The review was completed in FY 1998. Fiscal year costs were $78. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $9,810,000. Raymondville Drain, Texas - The project consist of 43.8 miles of channel work, including enlargement of existing channels, and construction of new channels, a 3.88-mile long levee, and diversion ditches along the west side of Raymondville, Texas. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $2,143,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1997. Fiscal year costs were $21,098. Hunting Bayou, Texas - The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 ( PL 101-640). The authorized project provides for 14.3 miles of stream improvements, recreation trails, picnic facilities, a comfort station, access and parking areas. The Local Sponsor was authorized to design and construct an alternative to the project and be reimbursed for the Federal share by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (PL 104-303). The project is currently being reformulated and will be identified by the General Reevaluation Study. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $1,710,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1998. Fiscal year costs were $31,164. 40-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 40-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998" 1. Aquatic Plant Control (Southwestern Division) 1965 Act 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX 3. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Double Bayou, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Freeport Harbor, TX 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 224,000 220,848 479,000 3,167,008 1,980,000 1,982,037 21,919 5,241,800 4,873,769 30,000 166,490 635,000 603,742 6,319 27,305 31,000 4,533,600' 4,784 4,507,118' 0 27,978,5022 21,221 27,942,5422 664,500 2,691,260 2,192,000 57,461,2363 673,911 2,664,921 2,153,377 57,393,804' - - - 2,170,080 - - - 2,170,080 250,000 115,789 2,510,000 2,876,195 10,033 New Work: Approp. (800,000) Cost 542,125 Maint: Approp. 2,703,500 Cost 2,708,717 Minor Rehab: Approp. - Cost - New Work: Approp. - Cost - Maint: Approp. 4,667,200 Cost 4,710,615 Major Rehab: Approp. -- Cost - 89,280 - 77,474,6394 340,542 12,089 77,472,4634 (3,957) 4,988,000 119,199,591' 75,970 3,836,430 118,044,094' - - 3,576,684 - - 3,576,684 - 149,887 - 433,050 - 431,188 - 154,569 - 131,000 - 6,279,088 - 6,143,152 - 226,558 - 226,558 - 1,845,128 134 1,843,400 - 256,894 - 233,325 45,000 2,564,804 4,052,000 64,721,9566 442,008 2,503,579 4,263,253 64,680,6056 5,948,000 4,620,841 3,630,000 75,129,256' 5,947,444 4,587,072 2,342,847 73,805,546' - - - 8,935 - - - 8,935 - - - 29,096,3928 - - - 29,096,392' 315,000 4,263,430 4,333,000 111,884,9189 321,195 4,246,903 4,319,309 111,853,3369 - - - 7,969,329 - - - 7,969,329 40-20 GALVESTON. TEXAS. DISTRICT TABLE 40-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998" 7. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and the Mexican Border (Galveston District) (Regular Funds) (Inland Waterways Trust Fund) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost 3,866,194 14,196,800 12,270,830 9,978,000 126,843,12710 6,851,092 15,544,808 12,332,656 8,097,000 124,737,046 to 3,751,000 10,971,000 8,558,000 2,941,000 28,765,000 4,144,554 11,108,145 8,649,381 3,122,015 28,607,566 (Regular Funds) (Inland Waterways Trust Fund) (Regular Funds) Maint: Appr Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost Minor Rehab: Approp. Cost 27,826,450 15,516,954 24,577,401 27,841,900 432,702,747" 28,655,473 15,409,003 24,582,562 26,035,524 430,682,64912 1,946,000 1,398,800 1,946,000 1,308,974 (200,0000) 1,077,391 (200,000) 1,116,142 250,000 415,369 250,000 467,140 8,781 9,338 3,430,638 3,398,500 2,996,000 2,958,225 - 835,873 - 835,873 8. Houston-Galveston New Work: Navigation Channels, TXApprop. (Regular Funds) Cost (Contributed Funds) 9. Houston Ship Channel, TX (Regular Funds) 10. Matagorda, Ship Channel, TX (Regular Funds) 11. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX (Regular Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 12. Texas City Channel, TX New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost 2,302,800 2,363,701 965,000 1,725,000 20,000,000 39,042,800 1,226,177 1,654,890 2,753,710 21,710,187 - 1,020,000 - 220,436 11,912,050 11,989,150 147,500 13,491 540,853 234,666 1,020,000 995,955 - - - 35,760,38213 - - - 35,760,38213 6,671,600 6,742,478 13,273,600 184,183,406'a 6,669,239 6,739,949 12,579,485 183,474,529'a - - - 18,058,777's - - - 18,058,777" 3,855,000 1,406,029 2,757,000 62,740,00716 3,996,501 1,400,113 2,030,483 62,002,88716 -- - - 56,136,815" -- - - 56,136,815" 3,304,000 17,125,646 11,594,320 8,356,000 227,180,506" 3,425,495 17,118,474 11,587,144 7,940,843 226,743,449"18 921,000 943,524 - 25,000 - 24,922 1,636,700 (50,596) 1,640,884 (52,144) 78 420,000 244,100 15,156,97219 15,156,97219 29,545,11520 29,367,07820 - 726,158 - 726,158 40-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 40-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Total Cost To Sep. 30, 1998u 13. Trinity River and Tributaries, TX (Includes Wallisville) 15. Corpus Christi Beach, TX (Restoration Project) (Contributed Funds) 16. Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX 17. Buffalo Bayou at Lynchburg, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 19. Clear Creek, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 20. Cypress Creek, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 21. Lower Rio Grande Basin, TX 22. Sims Bayou, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Recreation: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost Dam Safety: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 1,000,000 3,010,334 1,654,000 1,661,395 5,000,000 8,853,079 1,178,100 1,196,514 12,000,000 I1,989,713 739,714 665,091 9,200,000 8,902,679 880,000 772,311 71,123,67621 70,522,25121 22,104,32822 21,894,72722 - 2,120,641 - 2,120,641 - 2,038,345 - 2,009,710 704,000 856,225 2,292,000 2,246,100 (79,300) 2,136 66,000 87,634 90,596 62,275 820,837 1,493,500 3,420,310 68,271,07123 835,514 1,481,133 1,129,781 65,966,78823 - - - 377,804 - 174 - 377,797 3,134,500 2,835,440 5,115,500 41,263,555 3,169,504 2,825,098 4,604,711 40,660,067 - - - 12,475,000 - - - 12,475,000 - - - 12,693,700 - - - 12,693,700 43,500 64,056 118,879 165,000 96,969 161 1,213,000 231,000 5,463,502 1,178,005 758,944 5,526,988 - 400,000 275,000 - 10,000 523,381 174,100 258,497 175,000 235,257 1,631,500 1,698,995 5,080,000 8,042,245 400,000 632,223 335,000 324,518 320,800 305,072 155,000 162,349 170,000 189,180 711,663 962,000 723,293 973,452 15,032,000 15,144,932 1,900,000 1,615,661 13,026,290 12,855,241 885,500 1,146,701 262,800 726,600 279,578 675,341 - 273,346 - 253,286 1,004,000 21,896,863 928,246 21,800,983 - 1,315,000 (-530) 1,151,447 220,000 2,210,100 221,524 2,208,400 - 835,000 - 834,935 850,600 865,066 11,409,000 9,552,099 755,860 398,575 6,273,663 6,270,048 61,946,290 59,867,872 4,541,36024 3,877,75224 40-22 GALVESTON. TEXAS. DISTRICT TABLE 40-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 199825 28. Laguna Madre New Work: Seagrass Approp. 103,000 94,000 - (-1,560) 225,440 (Regular Funds) Cost 49,184 128,949 6,784 15,487 225,440 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. 44,000 31,000 4,000 (-3,854) 75,146 Cost 19,275 55,725 3,994 (-3,848) 75,146 ' Excludes $1,637,270 credit for contributed work. 2 Includes $675,855 for previous projects. In addition, $10,500,076 expended from contributed funds, of which $123,361 was for previous projects. Excludes $874,258 expended from contributed funds for dock removal for the local sponsor. 3In addition, $1,352,092 expended from contributed funds and $34,000 expended from contributed funds for Port Isabel. In addition $573,225 expended from contributed funds from the City of South Padre Island for beneficial placement of dredged material on the South Padre Island Beach. 4 Includes $1,372,534 for previous projects. Includes $456,515 for Sec. 107 project for Port Aransas Breakwaters. In addition $768 expended from contributed funds for Port Aransas Breakwaters. SIncludes $62,452 for previous projects. In addition, $1,057,677 expended from contributed funds. 6 Includes $147,098 for previous projects. In addition, $20,811,568 expended from contributed funds. ($581,615 on 45-foot project.) 7 In addition, $229,311 expended from contributed funds. 8 Includes $8,421,996 for previous projects. In addition, $3,648,932 expended from contributed funds. 9 Includes $86,126 for previous projects. In addition, $2,963,102 expended from contributed funds. o1In0c ludes $706,709 for previous projects. Includes Sec. 107 projects for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin ($46,559); Port Isabel Side Channel ($8,414); Offatts Bayou ($356,466); and Channel to Aransas Pass ($658,573). In addition contributed funds expended for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin ($46,559); Offatts Bayou ($49,665); Channel to Aransas Pass ($347,950); Chocolate Bayou ($658,310); Mouth of Colorado River ($3,379,080); ($421,340) Channel to Victoria; and ($862,716) expended for the local sponsor's levee requirement on Channel to Victoria. "Includes $1,526,564 for previous projects. In addition $22,672 contributed funds for main channel and $126,450 contributed funds for Rollover Pass (beginning 1997). Includes following amounts for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1987: Channel to Victoria $15,940,750. Channel to Aransas Pass $2,600. Chocolate Bayou Channel $2,469,040. Includes following amounts for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1989: Channel to Harlingen $6,625,315. Channel to Port Mansfield $6,869,609. Also includes $9,187,156 for Mouth of Colorado River, separately funded beginning in fiscal year 1992 and $31,200 contributed funds for Channel to Harlingen beginning in fiscal year 1998. 12 Includes $1,526,564 for previous projects. In addition $22,672 expended from contributed fundsfor main channel and $114,091 contributed funds for Rollover Pass (beginning 1997) for the beneficial placement of dredge material at Rollover Pass. Includes following amounts for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1987: Channel to Victoria $15,699,768, Channel to Aransas Pass $2,600, Chocolate Bayou Channel $2,466,294. In addition $955,574 was expended from contributed funds for Chocolate Bayou Channel. Also includes amounts for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1989: Channel to Harlingen $6,624,082. Channel to Port Mansfield $6,823,141. Also includes an expended amount of $9,184,765 for Mouth of Colorado River, separately funded in fiscal year 1992. In addition, includes $28,140 contributed funds expended beginning in fiscal year 1998. 13 Includes $4,105,157 for previous projects. In addition, $2,591,939 expended from contributed funds, of which $1,209,179 was for previous projects. '4 Includes $1,213,142 for previous projects. In addition, $534,641 expended from contributed funds for Houston Ship Channel, of which $200,000 was for previous projects and $125,000 expended from contributed funds for Greens Bayou Channel. Includes appropriated funds for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1992: Greens Bayou Channel $560,968. Barbour Terminal Channel $1,410,360. Bayport Ship Channel $6,508,375. Also, includes $91,942 contributed funds for Bayport Ship Channel beginning in FY 1998. Expenditures for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1992: Greens Bayou Channel $560,731. Barbour Terminal Channel $1,405,671. Bayport Ship Channel $6,504,647. In addition $91,942 expended from contributed funds for Bayport Ship Channel beginning in FY 1998. " In addition, $12,259,619 expended from contributed funds and $182,800 for contributed lands. 40-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 40-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 19986 16 Starting in fiscal year 1990 includes an appropriation of $2,333,885 and expenditures of $2,280,600 for Channel to Red Bluff. 17 Includes $5,180,832 for previous projects. In addition, $2,680,942 expended from contributed funds, of which $577,507 was for previous projects. 1" Includes $2,379,677 for previous projects. In addition, $5,169,188 expended from contributed funds and $7,944 expended from contributed funds for real estate acquisition for the local sponsor. 19 Includes $366,823 for previous projects. In addition, $1,023,819 expended from contributed funds, of which $99,000 was for mitigation measures. 20 Includes $195,083 for previous projects. 21 Includes $1,966,306 for previous projects. In addition, $66,000 expended from contributed funds. 22 Includes $543,662 for previous projects. 23 Includes $4,400,000 of advanced funds repaid to Harris County Flood Control District. In addition, $63,661 contributed funds expended for Brays Bayou and $12,900 Federal funds and $19,104 contributed funds expended for enlargement of Clodine Ditch. 24 Excludes $1,880,475 expended from contributed funds for real estate acquisition for the local sponsor. 25 Includes funds ($12,544,400) provided by the Jobs Act (P.L. 98-8, dated March 24, 1983) for projects listed in Table 15-I of Annual Report for 1985. 40-24 GALVESTON. TEXAS. DISTRICT TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act 1. Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 2. Jun. 3, 1930 May 24, 1934 (PWA) Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Nov. 17, 1986 3. Mar. 3, 1899 Project and Work Authorized AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Provides for control of progressive eradication of aquatic plant growth from the navigable waters and streams in the U.S. Amended cost sharing requirements to provide for 50 percent Federal and 50 percent non-Federal participation in control operations. BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX Jetties and jetty channel, inside channels and basins. Local cooperation requirement modified to provide contribution of funds to cover cost of original dredging of all inside channels and basins. Deepen jetty channel to 31 feet and inner channels and Brownsville and Port Isabel turning basins to 28 feet. Enlarge Port Isabel turning basin. Deepen entrance channel to 35 feet; deepen to 33 feet channel across Laguna Madre; deepen to 32 feet channels from Laguna Madre to turning basins at Brownsville and Port Isabel; widen turning basins; and dredging present shallow-draft channel south of Port Isabel from railroad bridge to Laguna Madre and connecting channel to Port Isabel turning basin. Additional connecting channel between Port Isabel and Brownsville channels; and transfer shallow-draft channels at Port Isabel to GIWW. Deepen to 38 feet in outer bar channels and 36 feet in all other authorized channels and basins; extend existing turning basins at Brownsville and Port Isabel; and construct small-boat basin with a connecting channel next to Brownsville ship channel. Widen Brownsville Channel to 300 feet at a depth of 36 feet from former Goose Island passing basin to turning basin extension, thence at a width of 500 feet and same depth to turning basin proper, deepen to 36 feet in area in southeast corner of turning basin, maintain two existing basins of fishing harbor, and a connecting channel, and construct a third basin, with necessary connecting channel and extend Brazos Island Harbor north jetty seaward 1,000 feet.27 Enlargement of the entrance channel from deep water in the Gulf of Mexico to the Laguna Madre to a depth of 44 feet and a width of 400 feet; enlargement of the Turning Basin Extension to a point 800 feet beyond the grain elevator to a depth of 42 feet at widths varying from 325 to 400 feet; removal of Brownsville Navigation District Wharves 5, 6, and 9 to permit widening of the adjacent portion of the Turning Basin to 1,200 feet at a depth of 36 feet; construction of asphalt walkways with handrails on the crown of the North and South Jetties, and construction of park-type public use facilities at the inner end of the North Jetty. CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX Acquisition of old curvey portion of north jetty previously constructed by private parties. Documents H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 103(c), PL 99-662 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 16, 71st Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 32, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 347, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 627, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 192, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 428, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess.' Sec. 201, PL 99-662 Specified in Act. 40-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX (Continued) 3. Jun. 13, 1902 Complete north jetty in accordance with builder's plans. Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 Mar. 4, 19132 Sep. 23, 1922 Complete north jetty in accordance with builder's plans. Connect old curve to St. Joseph Island, and construct south jetty. Dredge roadstead in Harbor Island Basin to 20 feet deep and construct 10,000 linear feet of stone dike on St. Joseph Island. Channel between jetties and Harbor Island Basin to 25 feet deep, extend jetties seaward, extend dike on St. Joseph Island 9,100 feet, and dredge approach channel 12 feet deep to town of Port Aransas. Dredging channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi, 25 feet deep, 200 feet bottom width. Jul. 3, 19303 Deepen entrance channel from gulf to Harbor Island and provide an inner basin at Harbor Island of reduced area but greater depth. Jul. 3, 1930 Channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi Channel with depth 30 feet. Aug. 30, 19354 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug 30, 1935 Jun. 20, 1938 Enlarge all channels from gulf to western end of basin dredge by Humble Oil and Refining Co., at its docks on Harbor Island. Maintain channel and maneuvering basin between breakwater and western shoreline of Corpus Christi Bay. Maintain 30-foot depth of approach channel, turning basin at Corpus Christi, Industrial Canal and turning basin at Avery Point. Maintain and deepen to 32 feet channel from deep water at Port Aransas to and including turning basin at Corpus Christi. Extend main turning basin at Corpus Christi westward 2,500 feet at its present width and depth, deepen existing Industrial Canal and turning basin to 32 feet and extend this canal at a depth of 32 feet and general width of 150 feet, westward along Nueces Bay shore to a turning basin 32 feet by 900 feet, and 1,000 feet long near Tule Lake. Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1094, 61st Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 1125, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 321, 67th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 214, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Committee Does. 35, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess., and 40, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 130, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 63, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 574, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. Mar. 2, 1945 Provide depth of 34 feet in all project channels and basins from Port Aransas to and including Tule Lake turning basin, for a width of 250 feet from Port Aransas to breakwater at Corpus Christi, for a width of 200 feet in Industrial Canal and in channel between Avery Point and Tule Lake turning basins, and widen Avery Point turning basin to 1,000 feet. H. Doc. 544, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. 40-26 GAIVESTON. TEXAS. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 3. Jun. 30, 1948 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 s Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended by Dec. 31, 1970) Aug. 13, 1968 Oct. 22, 1976 Sep. 15, 1994 CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX (Continued) Deepen entrance channel to 38 feet from gulf to outer end of jetty; 38 feet decreasing to 36 feet thence to station 90 north jetty; and 36 feet in all other deep water channels and basins except 2,000-foot undredged part of inner basin at Harbor Island, and a width of 400 feet in channel from Port Aransas to Maneuvering basin at Corpus Christi. An anchorage basin 12 feet deep, from 300 to 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long in Turtle Cove at Port Aransas, Texas. Branch channel 32 feet by 150 feet, extending northerly from main channel in vicinity of Port Ingleside, along north shore of Corpus Christi Bay to Reynolds Metals Co. plant and turning basin 32 feet deep and 800 feet square near plant in general vicinity of LaQuinta, Texas. An entrance channel 36 by 400 feet on a tangent alignment from 400-foot channel in Corpus Christi Bay, near Corpus Christi breakwater to flared approach channel to Corpus Christi turning basin. Deepen and widen LaQuinta Channel to 36 by 200 feet; enlarge LaQuinta turning basin to 36 by 800 by 1,000 feet; a flared entrance to channel; and widening at curves. Deepen entrance channel to 42 feet from gulf to outer end of jetty; 40 feet in all other deep-water channels and basins except undredged northward extension to inner basin at Harbor Island and branch channel to LaQuinta; and widen Industrial Channel to 400 feet with flared entrances to Corpus Christi and Avery Point turning basins. Channel 40 by 200 feet extending 2.2 miles from Tule Lake turning basin to a turning basin 40 feet deep, 700 to 900 feet wide, 1,000 feet long at Viola, Texas. Depth of 12 feet and a width of 100 feet in locally dredged Jewel Fulton Canal from LaQuinta Channel to a turning basin 12 by 200 by 400 feet, and assumption of maintenance by United States. Construction of a breakwater at entrance to harbor area at Port Aransas, and realignment of existing 12-foot by 100-foot project channel. Provides for a project depth of 45 feet in the existing deep-draft channels and basins, for construction of a new deep-draft turning point, for construction of a deep draft mooring area and mooring facilities and for widening of the channels and basins at certain locations. The Act also deauthorized the undredged northward extension of Inner Basin at Harbor Island and the undredged west turnout (Wye connection) between the LaQuinta Channel and the main channel of the waterway. Modified local cooperation requirements for 1968 Act. Shifted responsibility for cost of disposal areas and confinement works from sponsor to joint 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non- Federal responsibility. Assume maintenance of 17 foot by 100 foot Jewel Fulton Canal, after construction by local interest. H. Doc. 560, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 654, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 89, 83rd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 487, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 33, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 107, PL 86-645 S. Doc. 99, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess.' Sec. 124, PL 94-587 Sec. 204, PL 99-662 as amended 40-27 TABLE 40-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 4. Mar. 3, 1899 Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Oct. 25, 1965) DOUBLE BAYOU, TX A channel 6-feet deep and 100-feet wide through the bar at mouth of Double Bayou. 7-foot by 125-foot channel from the 7-foot depth in Trinity Bay to the intersection of Double Bayou Channel with the channel to Liberty; and thence a 7- by 100-foot channel upstream for 2.0 miles. H. Doc. 387, 55th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 107, PL 86-645 FREEPORT HARBOR, TX 5. Mar. 3, 1899 Dredging and other work necessary in judgment of Secretary of War for improving harbor; for taking over jetties and privately built works at mouth of river. Mar. 2, 1907 Examination authorized. Work later confined to maintenance of jetties. Feb. 27, 1911 Repairs to jetties and dredging. Mar. 4, 1913 Construct seagoing hopper dredge. Aug. 8, 1917 Purchase of one 15-inch pipeline dredge and equipment, its operation of 3 years, operation of seagoing dredge one-half time for 3 years, and repairs to jetties. Mar. 3, 19256 Diversion dam, diversion channel, and necessary auxiliary works. Jul. 3, 1930 Maintenance of diversion channel at expense of local interest. Aug. 30, 19357 Aug. 30, 1935 May 17, 1950 Deepening channels and basins. Maintenance of present project dimensions of channels and basins at Federal expense. Deepen outer bar channel to 38 feet from gulf to a point within jetties, thence 36 feet in authorized channels to and including upper turning basin. Jul. 3, 1958 Relocate outer bar channel on straight alignment with jetty channel and maintain Brazos Harbor entrance channel and turning basin (constructed by local interests). Oct. 5, 1961 Modification of HD 1469. Revoking certain provisions of local cooperation. Dec. 31, 1970 Nov. 17, 1986 Relocation of entrance channel and deepen to 47 feet; enlargement to a depth of 45 feet and relocation of jetty channel and inside main channel; deepening to 45 feet of channel to Brazosport; enlargement of the widened area of Quintana Point to provide a depth of 45 feet with a 750-foot diameter turning area; Brazosport turning basin to 45 feet deep with a 1,000 foot turning area; a new turning basin with a 1,200 foot diameter turning area and 45 feet deep; deepening Brazosport channel to 36 by 750 feet diameter; flared approaches from Brazos Harbor Channel; relocation of north jetty and rehabilitation of south jetty. Modified local cooperation requirements for the 1970 Act. Specified in Act. H. Doc. 1087, 60th Cong., 2nd Sess. Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 68th Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 18, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 15, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Does. 15, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess., and 29, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 195, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 433, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. PL 394, 87th Cong. H. Doc. 289, 93rd Cong., 2nd Sess.2 Sec. 101, PL 99-662 40-28 TABLE 40-B See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act 6. Aug. 5, 1886 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 19109 Jul. 27, 1916 Jul. 18, 1918 Sep. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935" Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Apr. 4, 1938 Jun. 30, 1948 GALVESTON. TEXAS. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX Construct 2 rubblestone jetties at entrance to Galveston Harbor. A channel 1,200 by 30 feet from Bolivar Roads (outer end of old inner bar near Fort Point) at 51st Street.' Purchase or construct hydraulic pipeline dredge. Extension of jetties to present project length and construction and operation of a dredge. Extension of Galveston Channel from 51st to 57th Sts., with depth of 30 feet and width of 700 feet. Conditional extension of Galveston Channel between 51st and 57th Sts., 30 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide. Extend seawall at Galveston from angle at 6th St., and Broadway to vicinity of Fort San Jacinto. Deepen harbor channel to 35 feet and widen to 800 feet. Further extension of seawall at Galveston to a junction with south jetty; and repairing seawall in front of Fort Crockett reservation. Deepen Galveston Channel to 32 feet; and maintain Galveston Harbor channels to dimensions of 800 feet wide, 35 feet deep on outer bar and 34 feet deep in inner bar.'0 Maintain State Highway Ferry Landing Channels to dimensions of 12 by 100 feet. Construct 13 groins along gulf shore from 12th to 61st Sts. in city of Galveston at a limited cost of $234,000 (10 groins constructed). Deepen Galveston Channel to 34 feet (Bolivar Roads to 43rd St.). Deepen Galveston entrance channel to 36 feet. Completion of project for construction of 13 groins. Deepen Galveston Harbor to 38 feet from gulf to a point 2 miles west of seaward end of north jetty; thence 36 feet to Bolivar Roads; revoking authority for maintenance of ferry channels; and Galveston channel to 36 feet deep from Bolivar Roads to 43rd Street. 40-29 Documents H. Doc. 85, 49th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report, 1886, p. 1311. H. Doc. 264, 56th Cong., 2nd Sess. Specified in Act. H. Doc. 340, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 768, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 328, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1390, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc 758, 65th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 693, 66th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 307, 69th Cong., Ist Sess. River and Harbors Committee Doc. 31, 72nd Cong., I1st Sess. H. Doc. 400, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 61, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 57, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. PL 463, 75th Cong. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 6. May 17, 1950 GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX (Continued) Deepen outer bar channel to 38 feet from gulf to a point within jetties, thence 36 feet in authorized channels to and including upper turning basin. Jul. 3, 1958 Dredge to a depth of 42 feet over the authorized width of 800 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to a point 2 miles west of the seawall and of the North jetty thence at a depth of 40 feet to the junction of the Houston Ship Channel, with widths of 800 feet to Bolivar Roads, thence decreasing to 400 feet at the junction with the Houston Ship Channel. Jun. 23, 1971 (House Res.) Nov. 18, 1971 (Senate Res. Oct. 12, 1996 Deepen Galveston Channel to 40 feet from Bolivar to 43rd Street. Provides for navigation and environmental restoration improvements. The navigation improvements consist of deepening and widening the Entrance Channel to 47 feet deep and 800 feet wide; the Houston Ship Channel to 45 feet deep and 530 feet wide; and the Galveston Channel to 45 feet deep. The environmental restoration portion consist of initial construction of marsh habitat and a colonial waterbird nesting island through the beneficial use of new work dredged material, and incremental development (deferred construction) of additional marsh over the life of the navigation project through the beneficial use of maintenance materials dredged from Galveston Bay. The project is referred to as Houston-Galveston Navigation Channels. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL AND MEXICAN BORDER n2 7. Mar. 2, 1907 Channel 4 by 100 feet from West Galveston Bay across Chocolate Bay to 4 feet of water in Chocolate Bay. Mar. 3, 1925 Channel 9 by 100 feet, Sabine River to Galveston Bay, and a 20- inch pipeline dredge. Such passing places, widening at bends, locks or guard locks and railway bridges over artificial cuts as are necessary. Jan. 21, 1927 Channel 9 by 100 feet, Galveston Bay to Corpus Christi. Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 20, 1938's Jun. 20, 1938 Jun. 20, 1938 Jun. 20, 1938 Jun. 20, 1938 Mar. 23, 1939 Maintenance of a flood-discharge channel in Colorado River. Channel 9 by 100 feet in San Bernard River, Texas. Channel in Colorado River, 9 by 100 feet, with basin. Channel 9 by 100 feet from Palacios through Trepalacios and Matagorda Bays. Channel 9 by 200 feet from main channel to harbor at Rockport and improve harbor to 9-foot depth. Channel 6 by 100 feet from main channel to Aransas Pass, Texas. Enlarge waterway to depth of 12 feet and a width of 125 feet from Sabine River to Corpus Christi. H. Doc. 195, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 350, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 121, 92nd Cong. Sec. 101 (30), PL 104-303 H. Doc 445, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Committee print, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 640, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 642, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 564, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 641, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 643, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 230, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. 40-30 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 7. Jul. 23, 1942 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 19459 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 194514 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Jul. 12, 1952 Sep. 3, 1954's Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 9, 1959 GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY (Continued) Construct waterway from Corpus Christi to vicinity of Mexican border to provide a depth of 12 feet and width of 125 feet throughout. Channel 6 by 60 feet from GIWW to a point in Chocolate Bayou near Liverpool. Channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from main channel near Port O'Connor, Texas, in Barroom Bay. Enlarge channel from main channel to Aransas Pass, Texas, providing a depth of 9 feet and width of 100 feet. Channel 12 by 125 feet from main channel to Red Fish Landing, Texas, with basin. Channel 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide from main channel to vicinity of Harlingen, Texas, via Arroyo Colorado with basin. Fill a portion of shallow-draft channel adjacent to Port Isabel Turning Basin, construct a channel to connect shallow-draft channel with main channel near shoreline of Laguna Madre, and enlarge shallow-draft channel west of this connection, all to 12- foot depth and bottom width of 125 feet. Reroute main channel to north shore of Red Fish Bay between Aransas Bay and Corpus Christi Bay; deepen tributary channel from Port Aransas to Aransas Pass, Texas, 12 feet and extended basin at same depth. Deauthorized 6 by 60 foot channel in Chocolate Bayou and reauthorized the 4 by 100-foot channel. Alternate channel across South Galveston Bay between Port Bolivar and Galveston causeway. "Red Fish Landing" changed to "Port Mansfield, Texas." Incorporate as part of Intracoastal Waterway a channel 9 by 100 feet from main channel via Seadrift to point on Guadalupe River 3 miles above Victoria, Texas, authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1945. Small craft harbor 9 by 200 by 1,000 feet at Seadrift with an entrance channel 9 by 100 feet. Widen tributary channel between Port Aransas and Aransas Pass, Texas, to 125 feet; straighten and widen to 125 feet connecting channel to Conn Brown Harbor, and maintain Conn Brown Harbor at Federal expense, all to 12 feet deep. Improve channels and basins comprising channel to Port Mansfield constructed in part by Federal Government and in part by local interest; constructing turnout curves at Gulf Intracoastal Waterway intersection and bend easing at entrance to turning basin; construct parallel jetties at gulf entrance; maintenance of locally dredged jetty channel 16 by 250 feet; and maintenance of small craft basin. PL 675, 77th Cong. H. Doc. 337, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 428, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 383, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc 248, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 402, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. (See PL 14, 79th Cong.) H. Doc. 627, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 700, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 768, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 196, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. PL 516, 81st Cong. PL 527, 82nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 478, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 376, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 11, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. 40-31 TABLE 40-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY (Continued) 7. Jul. 14, 1960 Entrance channel 7 feet deep by 75 feet wide from main channel to Gulf of Mexico to inside shoreline at Port Isabel, Texas, an inner channel 6 feet deep by 50 feet wide from entrance channel to East Harbor Basin, and an irregular-shaped harbor basin 6 feet deep having a surface area of about 7 acres. Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Oct. 23, 196216 Deepen the existing 6-foot channel at Port Isabel to 12 feet and removing the submerged bars at each end of the island to a depth of -12 feet MLT. Deepening the existing channel to 12 by 125 feet, and extend southeasterly from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway main channel in West Galveston Bay, into Offatts Bayou, a distance of 2.2 miles, and a west turnout 12 by 125 feet between the proposed Offatts Bayou Channel and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Deepening Aransas Pass tributary channel to 14 feet from mile 0 at Harbor Island to mile 6.1 at the city of Aransas Pass; widening to 175 feet between miles 3.5 and 4.6; and deepening Conn Brown Harbor, turning basin and connecting channel between Conn Brown Harbor and turning basin. Improve main channel 16 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel; with two relocations; relocate main channel in Matagorda Bay and Corpus Christi Bay; and maintaining existing Lydia Ann Channel. Oct. 23, 1962 Deepen and widen channel to Palacios; construct two protective breakwaters; maintain and deepen existing basins; and deepen, enlarge and maintain existing approach channel to basin No. 2. Oct. 23, 1962 Eliminates requirement of local interest to construct bridge at mile 29.2 turning basin at Victoria, and maintain turning basins at Victoria and Seadrift; provide: Federal construction of verticallift railroad bridge at Missouri-Pacific Railroad mainline crossing, mile 29.2; construction and future maintenance of basin near Victoria, Texas, and maintenance of basin constructed by local interests at Seadrift, Texas. Sec. 107, PL 645, 86th Cong. Sec. 107, PL 86-645 Sec. 107, PL 86-645 Sec. 107, PL 86-645 H. Doc. 556, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 504, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 288, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. Oct. 27, 196517 Aug. 13, 1968 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 Modify existing Federal navigation project to provide a channel extending from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Chocolate Bay and Chocolate Bayou to project channel mile 8.2, thence to a turning basin near channel mile 13.2 and for salt water barrier in Chocolate Bayou about 3.7 miles upstream from basin (channel mile 16.9). Entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide at the mouth of Colorado River Channel protected by an east jetty 3,500 feet long extending to 12-foot depth and a west jetty 2,900 feet long extending to 5-foot contour; make channel 12 feet by 100 feet from gulf shore to Matagorda, including recreation facility, a turning basin 12 feet by 300 feet wide and 1,450 feet long, and a new diversion channel 250 feet wide and varying in depth from 20 to 23 feet including a closure dam across the present river channel. Modified 1968 authorization to provide that diversion features be constructed at Federal expense and operation and maintenance be shared 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal. Enlarge existing Channel to Victoria from a depth of 9 feet and width of 100 feet to a depth of 12 feet and width of 125 feet. H. Doc. 217, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 102, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 812, PL 99-662 Sec. 3, PL 100-676 40-32 GALVESTON. TEXAS. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 7. Oct. 31, 1992 Oct. 12, 1996 8. Oct. 12, 1996 9. Mar. 5, 1905 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935" Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2,1945 Mar 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY (Continued) Provide 8 miles of erosion protection for the existing waterway in the vicinity of Sargent, Texas. Provides for erosion protection along a 31-mile reach of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway which crosses the critical wintering habitat of the endangered whooping crane, including a 13.25 mile reach within the boundary of the Aransas National Wildlife Refuge. Also, provides for limited oil spill containment features and equipment to protect those areas from accidental hazardous spills. HOUSTON-GALVESTON NAVIGATION CHANNELS, TX Provides for navigation and environmental restoration improvements. The navigation improvements consist of deepening and widening the Entrance Channel to 47 feet deep and 800 feet wide; the Houston Ship Channel to 45 feet deep and 530 feet wide; and the Galveston Channel to 45 feet deep. The environmental restoration portion consist of initial construction of marsh habitat and a colonial waterbird nesting island through the beneficial use of new work dredged material, and incremental development (deferred construction) of additional marsh over the life of the navigation project through the beneficial use of maintenance materials dredged from Galveston Bay. HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX Easing or cutting off sharp bends and construction of a pile dike." A channel 30 feet deep, widen bend at Manchester and enlarge turning basin. A light-draft extension of channel to mouth of White Oak Bayou. 19 Widen channel through Morgan Point and to a point 4,000 feet above Baytown and widen certain bends. Deepen to 32 feet in main channel and turning basin, and a 400- foot width through Galveston Bay. Deepen to 34 feet in main channel and widen from Morgan Point to turning basin Branch channel 10 by 60 feet behind Brady Island. Widen channel from Morgan Point to lower end of Fidelity Island with turning points at mouth of Hunting Bayou and lower end of Brady Island. Widen channel from lower end of Fidelity Island to Houston turning basin and dredge off-channel silting basins. Deepen to 36 feet from Bolivar Roads to and including main turning basin at Houston, Texas, including turning points at Hunting Bayou and Brady Island. Sec. 101 (20), PL 102-580 Sec. 101 (29), PL 104-303 Sec. 101 (30), PL 104-303 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 35, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1632, 65th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 93, 67th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 13, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 58, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 226, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 226, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 737, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. 40-33 TABLE 40-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX (Continued) 9. Jul. 3, 195820 Deepen to 40 feet from Bolivar Roads to Brady Island, construct Clinton Island turning basin, a channel 8 by 125 feet at Five Mile Cut, and improve shallow-draft channel at Turkey Bend. Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 12, 1996 10. Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Barbour Terminal at Morgan Point. Restoring existing locally dredged channel from mile 0 to 0.34 to 36 feet deep and dredging a 15-12 ft. channel from mile 0.34 to 2.81, in Greens Bayou.21 Maintenance of Greens Bayou, Barbour Terminal Channel, and Bayport Ship Channel to forty-foot depths at Federal expense. Provides for navigation and environmental restoration improvements. The navigation improvements consist of deepening and widening the Entrance Channel to 47 feet deep and 800 feet wide; the Houston Ship Channel to 45 feet deep and 530 feet wide; and the Galveston Channel to 45 feet deep. The environmental restoration portion consist of initial construction of marsh habitat and a colonial waterbird nesting island through the beneficial use of new work dredged material, and incremental development (deferred construction) of additional marsh over the life of the navigation project through the beneficial use of maintenance materials dredged from Galveston Bay. The project is referred to as Houston-Galveston Navigation Channels. MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX Channel to Port Lavaca, Texas 7 feet deep and 89 feet bottom width. Extend 7-foot channel to shoreline of Lavaca Bay at mouth of Lynns Bayou. Deepen and widen channel to present project dimensions. Mar. 2, 1945 Extend channel 6 by 100 feet from Port Lavaca via Lavaca Bay, Lavaca and Navidad Rivers to Red Bluff, a distance of 20 miles. Mar. 2, 1945 A harbor of refuge 9 feet deep near Port Lavaca and an approach channel 100 feet wide and equal depth. Jul. 3, 1958 Deepen to 12 feet and widen to 125 feet Port Lavaca Channel and approach channel to harbor of refuge; deepen to 12 feet Port Lavaca turning basin and basins at harbor of refuge. Jul. 3, 1958 An entrance channel 38 by 300 feet, a channel 36 by 200 feet, 22 miles long across Matagorda and Lavaca Bays to Point Comfort, Texas, a turning basin 36 feet deep and 1,000 feet square at Point Comfort, and dual jetties at entrance from gulf. SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX 11. Jul. 25, 1912 Existing project dimensions of jetties, a 26-foot channel through Sabine Pass, Port Arthur Canal and Port Arthur turning basin; and a 26-foot turning basin at Port Arthur. A depth of 25-feet in Sabine-Neches Canal, Neches River to Beaumont and Sabine River to Orange, including cutoffs and widening channels. H. Doc. 350, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess.' Sec. 107, PL 86-645 H. Doc. 257, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 819, PL 99-662 Sec. 101 (30), PL 104-303 H. Doc. 1082, 60th Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 37, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 314, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 731, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 131, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 388, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 773, 61 st Cong., 2nd Sess. 40-34 GAIIVESTON. TEXAS. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 11. Sep. 22, 1922 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935" Aug. 30, 1935" Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 20, 193822 Oct. 17, 1940 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 194623 SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX (Continued) Deepen channels to 30 feet from gulf to Beaumont, with increased widths and an anchorage basin in Sabine Pass. Deepen Port Arthur east and west turning basins and approach channel to 30 feet. Take over and deepen to 30 feet channel connecting west turning basin with Taylors Bayou turning basin. For a 30-foot depth in channel from mouth of Neches River to cutoff in Sabine River near Orange. Removal of guard lock in Sabine-Neches Canal. Widen Sabine Pass and jetty channel, Port Arthur Canal, and Sabine- Neches Canal. For dredging 2 passing places in Sabine- Neches Canal, easing of bends, removal and reconstructing Port Arthur field office, extending Beaumont turning basin upstream 200 feet above new city wharves, and an anchorage basin in Sabine Pass. A depth of 32 feet in channels from gulf to Beaumont turning basin, including all turning basins at Port Arthur. Deepen channels to 34 feet with increased widths from gulf to Beaumont turning basin. Construct suitable permanent protective works along Sabine Lake. Maintain Taylors Bayou turning basin. Maintain channel from Sabine River to Orange Municipal wharf. Dredging 500 feet from eastern end of Harbor Island and abandonment of channel south and west of Harbor Island. Increased widths of channels from gulf to Beaumont turning basin and channel connecting Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin, deepen Beaumont turning basin and Beaumont turning extension to 34 feet; and dredge a new cutoff from Smith's Bluff cutoff to McFadden Bend. Abandon Orange turning basin; dredge a channel 25 by 150 feet, suitably widened on bends to highway bridge, and dredge a cutoff channel opposite Orange. Extend Beaumont turning basin upstream 300 feet. Widen Port Arthur west turning basin to 600 feet. Dredge a channel from Beaumont turning basin to vicinity of Pennsylvania Shipyard. Deepen Sabine Pass outer bar channel to 37 feet, Sabine Pass jetty channel to 36 feet at inner end, deepen to 36 feet Sabine Pass Channel, Port Arthur Canal, Port Arthur east and west turning basins, Taylors Bayou turning basin and channel from Port Arthur west turning basin to Taylors Bayou turning basin, deepen to 36 feet and widen to 400 feet Sabine-Neches Canal from Port Arthur Canal to mouth of Neches River except through Port Arthur Bridge; deepen Neches River channel from H. Doc. 975, 66th Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc. 152, 67th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 234, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc 287, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 27, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 12, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 581, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc 14, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 685, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc 60, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc 158, 77th Cong. 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 571, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. 40-35 TABLE 40-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 11. Jul. 24, 194624 SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX (Continued) mouth to Beaumont turning basin to 36 feet widening to 350 feet from Smith's Bluff to Beaumont turning basin; deepen junction area on Neches River at Beaumont turning basin to 36 feet; and widen Sabine-Neches Canal between Neches and Sabine Rivers to 150 feet. Improve Cow Bayou, Texas, by construction of a channel 100 feet wide and 13 feet deep extending from navigation channel in Sabine River to a point 0.5 mile above county bridge at Orangefield, Texas, with a turning basin. Jul. 24, 1946 Improve Adams Bayou, Texas, to provide a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending from 12-foot depth in Sabine River to first county highway bridge across bayou. H. Doc. 702, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 626, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. Deepen to 36 feet and widen to 400 feet the Sabine-Neches Canal near Port Arthur bridge; reconstruct Port Arthur Bridge and relocate Port Arthur field office. Rectification of certain reaches of existing Sabine Pass Channel, Sabine-Neches Canal, and Neches River and Sabine River Channel; widen to 350 feet entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basins; widen curve at junction of Port Arthur and Sabine-Neches Canals; relocate and enlarge Sabine Pass anchorage basin to 34 by 1,500 by 3,000 feet; widen to 200 feet Sabine- Neches Canal from mouth of Neches River to mouth of Sabine River and Sabine River Channel to upper end of existing project at Orange, except for channel around Harbor Island at Orange; deepen to 30 feet Sabine River Channel from cutoff near Orange municipal slip to upper end of project, except around Harbor Island; and enlarge area at entrance to Orange municipal slip to provide a maneuvering basin. Improve outer bar channel to 42 and 40 feet for all inland channels to Port Arthur and Beaumont; width of 500 feet in Port Arthur Canal and 400 feet in Neches River Channel to Beaumont with three turning points in Neches River; a channel, 12 by 125 feet, extending in Sabine River to Echo; and replace an obstructive bridge at Port Arthur, Texas. Deauthorization of uncompleted portion of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin and enlargement of entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basins. H. Doc. 174, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 80, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 553, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.' TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX 12. Mar. 4, 1913 A channel 300 by 30 feet and construct a pile dike 28,200 feet long north to channel. Jul. 3, 1930 A harbor 800 by 30 feet at Texas City, and construct a rubblemound dike. Aug. 30, 1935" Extension of rubblemound dike to shoreline. Aug. 30, 1935 Deepen channel and harbor to 32 feet. Aug. 30, 1935 Deepen channel and harbor to 34 feet. H. Doc. 1390, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 107, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 46, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 62, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 40-36 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 195425 Oct. 23, 196226 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 12. Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 30, 1948 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 12, 1972 (Senate Res.) Oct. 12, 1972 (House Res.) Nov. 17, 1986 13. Jun. 18, 1878 1889 Jun. 13, 1902 (As amended Mar. 3, 1905, Mar. 2, 1907, Jun. 25, 1910, Jul. 25, 1912, Mar. 4, 1913, and Jul. 27, 1916) Mar. 3, 1905 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 2, 1945 TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX (Continued) Extend harbor 1,000 feet southward, 800 by 34 feet. Deepen channel and harbor to 36 feet, widen channel to 400 feet and harbor to 1,000 feet and changing name of project to "TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TEXAS." Deepen channel and turning basin to 40 feet and construct 16-foot Industrial Barge Canal. Widen the existing main turning basin to 1,200 feet including relocation of the basin 85 feet to the east; providing a 40-foot deep channel in the Industrial Canal at widths of 300-400 feet, with a turning basin at the head of the canal 40 feet deep, 1,150 feet long, and 1,000 feet wide, and easing of the bend at the entrance to the canal, and deauthorization of shallow-draft Industrial Barge Canal not incorporated in the plan of improvement above. Deepening the Texas City Turning Basin to 50 feet, enlarging the 6.7 mile long Texas City Channel to 50 feet by 600 feet; deepening the existing 800-foot wide Bolivar Roads Channel and Inner Bar Channel to 50 feet; deepening the existing 800-foot wide Outer Bar and Galveston Entrance Channels to 52 feet; extending the Galveston Entrance Channel to a 52 foot depth for 4.1 miles at a width of 800 feet and an additional reach at a width of 600 feet to the 52 foot contour in the Gulf of Mexico; and establishment of 600 acres of wetland and development of water-oriented recreational facilities on a 90-acre enlargement of the Texas City Dike. TRINITY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Dredging of a channel through the bar at the mouth of the Trinity River. Modified to include two parallel jetties 275 feet apart, the westerly one of length 7,359 feet and the other of length 300 feet. Improvement of the Trinity River in the interest of providing navigation from the mouth of the Trinity River to Dallas. The plan provided for the construction of 37 locks and dams, with auxiliary dredging and other open-channel work necessary to obtain a 6-foot depth for continuous navigation (excepting periods of excessive drought). Each Act also authorized the construction of certain-named locks and dams. Authorized the Anahuac Channel. No project dimensions were specified by the Act, so a 7- by 8-foot channel, 12,238 feet long was dredged in 1905. Abandon improvements above Liberty and terminate all improvements by lock and dam, leaving a 6-foot channel from Liberty to mouth. Provides for a navigable channel from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston and Trinity Bays to the mouth of Trinity River and 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide in the river section, with a turning basin at Liberty. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 47, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Doc. 427, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 199, 92nd Cong., 2nd Sess. (Sec. 201, PL 89-298) Sec. 201, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 409, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. Specified in Act. H. Doc. 989, 66th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. 40-37 TABLE 40-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 13. Jul. 24, 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 30, 1983 16. Dec. 15, 1970 (House Res.) Dec. 17, 1970 (Senate Res.) 17. Jun. 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 28, 1990 Oct. 12. 1996 TRINITY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX (Continued) Modification of the project to provide for a channel 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston Bay extending along the east shore of Trinity Bay to the mouth of the Trinity River at Anahuac, including protective spoil embankment on the bay side of the channel in lieu of the 9 by 200-foot channel in Galveston and Trinity Bays. Provides for the multiple-purpose Wallisville Reservoir, including a navigation lock in the Wallisville Dam at Channel Mile 28.30 and advancement of the Channel to Liberty from one mile below Anahuac (Mile 23.2) to the Texas Gulf Sulphur Company's slip at Channel Mile 35.8, and incorporation into existing project Anahuac Channel and mouth of Trinity River projects. Reevaluation of navigation benefits. Modified Wallisville Reservoir by reducing the size to 5,600 acres and confining the reservoir to east side of Trinity River. CORPUS CHRISTI BEACH, TX (RESTORATION PROJECT) Restoration and periodic nourishment of 1.4 miles of beach. BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Barker and Addicks Reservoirs, Texas. Clearing, straightening, enlarging and lining of Buffalo, Brays, and White Oak Bayous. Extend upper limits of White Oak Bayou upstream about 2.1 miles from BRI RR bridge to mouth of Cole Creek. Flood damage reduction improvements and recreational development for the Houston, Texas urban area, divided into six separable elements - Brays, Greens, Hunting, Halls, Carpenters and Little White Oak Bayous. Flood control improvements consist of 75.3 miles of stream enlargement, 14 miles of stream clearing, 7 flood detention basins, 7 miles of diversion channels and environmental revegetation. Recreation features consist of 14.7 miles of trails, 502 picnic facilities, 12 group pavilions, 2 boat launching ramps, 10 restrooms, play-grounds, exercise stations and parking facilities. Authorizes non-Federal interests to undertake flood control projects in the United States, subject to obtaining any permits required pursuant to Federal and State laws in advance of actual construction. For the purpose of demonstrating the potential advantages and effectiveness of non-Federal implementation of flood control projects, the Secretary shall enter into agreements pursuant to this section with non-Federal interests for development of the following Buffalo Bayou projects: Brays Bayou, Hunting Bayou, and White Oak Bayou. H. Doc. 634, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 215, 87th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., Ist Sess. PL 98-63 H. Doc. 415, 91st Cong., 2nd Sess. (Sec. 201, PL 89-298) H. Doc. 456, 75th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 250, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Doc. 169, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 101, PL 101-640 Sec. 211, PL 104-303 40-38 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 17. Oct. 12, 1996 Oct. 12, 1996 19. Aug. 13, 1968 Nov. 17, 1986 20. Nov. 17, 1988 21. Nov. 17, 1986 22. Nov. 17, 1986 Sep. 29, 1989 BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX (Continued) The non-Federal interest for the Buffalo Bayou and tributaries authorized flood control projects, may be reimbursed by up to $5,000,000 or may receive a credit of up to $5,000,000 toward required non-Federal project cost-sharing contributions for work performed by the non-Federal interest at each of the following locations if such work is compatible with 1 or more of the follwing authorized projects: White Oak Bayou, Brays Bayou, Hunting Bayou, Garners Bayou (not authorized), and the Upper Reach of Greens Bayou. During any evaluation of economic benefits and costs that occurs after October 12, 1996, the Secretary shall not consider flood control works constructed by non-Federal interests within the drainage area of such projects prior to the date of such evaluation in the determination of conditions existing prior to construction of the following authorized projects: Buffalo Bayou Basin, Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries (Brays, Greens, Hunting, Halls, Little White Oak, and Carpenters Bayous), and Cypress Creek. CLEAR CREEK, TX Channel enlargement and rectification from upper end of Clear Lake at Mile 3.8 to improved channel Mile 34.8.28 Modified local cooperation requirements of the 1968 authorization. CYPRESS CREEK, TX Enlargement and rectification of lower 29.4 miles of Cypress Creek channel and recreational development. LOWER RIO GRANDE BASIN, TX Channel improvements to provide drainage protection for the area in Hidalgo and Willacy Counties north of U.S. Highway 83, and for the area between U.S. Highway 83 and the Rio Grande in Hidalgo County; and to provide flood protection for the cities of McAllen, Edinburg, Raymondville, Edcouch, LaVihadLycd. SIMS BAYOU, TX Enlargement and rectification, with appropriate erosion control measures of 19.31 miles of Sims Bayou; environmental measures and riparian habitat along entire alignment, and recreational development. Amended the Water Resources and Development Act (WRDA) of 1986 authorization as project cost estimate had exceeded limit established in Section 902 of WRDA 1986. Sec 350, PL 104-303 Sec. 575, PL 104-303 H. Doc. 351, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 1001, PL 99-662 Sec. 3, PL 100-676 Sec. 401, PL 99-662 Sec. 401, PL 99-662 Sec. 103, PL 101-101 40-39 TABLE 40-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 'Contains latest published maps. 2 Extension of north jetty 1,950 feet and south jetty 1,265 feet considered inactive. 3Dredging 2,000 by 650-foot northerly extension of inner basin deauthorized. 4Included in Public Works Administration program September 6, 1933 and February 16, 1935. sWest leg of Wye junction with main channel deauthorized. 6 Construction of lock in diversion dam at local expense considered inactive. ' Dredging upper .5 mile of channel to vicinity of Stauffer Chemical plant was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. Included in Public Works Administration program September 6, 1933. g Dredging 43rd to 51st Streets was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 9 Deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 1o Deepening 43rd to 57th Streets was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. " Previously authorized September 6, 1933 by Public Works Administration. 12 H. Doc. 230, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. and project documents contain latest published maps. 13' Dredging upper 3.5 miles was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 14 Dredging upper 5 miles was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 15 Inactive. '6 Portion of 16-foot by 150-foot channel from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel is inactive. Relocation of channel in Matagorda Bay deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 17 The 9 feet by 100 feet channel from Mile 8.2 to Mile 13.2 in Chocolate Bayou was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 1 Construction of pile dike was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 9 Hill Street Bridge to mouth of White Oak Bayou was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 20 Deepening channel to 40 feet from Southern Pacific Slip to Brady Island was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93- 251. 21 The 12-foot channel from mile 1.65 to mile 2.81 deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 22 Complete widening of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 23 Complete deepening of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 24 Channel extension above Cow Bayou turning basin near Orangefield was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93- 251. 25 Widening to 350 feet entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 26 The 12-foot channel in Sabine River from Orange to Echo, Texas deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 27 Jetty extension was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 28 Portion of project upstream of Brazoria/Galveston County line, approximately mile 18.5, in inactive category. 40-40 GALVESTON, TEXAS. DISTRICT TABLE 40-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to September 30, 1998 Report See Annual Report Operation and Project For Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Control (1958 and 1962 River and Harbor Acts)9 1967 38,2522- Bastrop Bayou, TX3 1931 9,920 27,129 Cedar Bayou, TX 1996 681,263' 3,461,5469 Channel to Port Bolivar, TX 1995 133,9254 1,231,061s Clear Creek and Clear Lake, TX 1982 66,934 537,139 Corpus Christi, TX, Channel to Navy Seaplane Base Encinal Peninsula 1968 1,194,344 26,467 Dickinson Bayou, TX 1954 33,942 57,553 East Bay (Hanna Reef), TX6 1922 2,476 847 Greens Bayou Bridges, TX 1993 450,000 - Johnson Bayou, LA' 1933 2,261 54,042 Little Bay, TX7 1979 - 252,728 Neches River and Trib., Salt Water Barrier at Beaumont,TX (Advance Engineering & Design) 1984 1,503,843 - Oyster Creek, TX 1922 6,942 7,556 Channel adequate for existing commerce. 2 Excludes $1,672 work contribution. 3Widening from 60 feet to 100 feet at 4-foot depth was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 4 Includes $48,711 for previous projects. s Includes $46,101 for previous projects. 6 Inactive category for maintenance. ' Aransas County Navigation District, Rockport, TX, constructed project as authorized by 1950 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 114, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.) in 1955 under Department of Army permit. g Includes $39,087 for previous projects. In addition $25,000 expended from contributed funds. 9 Includes $69,784 for previous projects. 40-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 40-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS F A Project Arroyo Colorado, Rio Hondo, TX Baytown, TX' Buffalo Bayou at Piney Point, TX Colorado River, Matagorda, TX2 Falfurrias, TX Freeport and Vicinity, Texas, Hurricane-Flood Protection 2 Guadalupe River at Victoria, TX Guadalupe River (Remove Log Jams), TX2 Highland Bayou, TX2 Kirbyville, TX2 Lavaca-Navidad River, TX: Hallettsville Project General channel project Mill Creek, TX' Port Arthur and Vicinity Hurricane-Flood Protection, TX San Diego Creek, Alice, TX2 State Highway 111 Bridge, Lake Texana, TX Taylors Bayou, TX Texas City and Vicinity, Texas, Hurricane-Flood Protection2 Tranquitas Creek, Kingsville, TX2 Three Rivers, TX5 Upper White Oak Bayou, TX U.S. 190 Bridge, Sabine River, Merryville, LA2 Vince and Little Vince Bayous, TX2 For Last Full Report See nnual Report For 1986 1980 1996 1963 1995 1984 1996 1978 1984 1993 1961 1952 1952 1997 1963 1995 1997 1993 1956 6 1989 1993 1993 Construct 201, 245, 473,1 273, 103, 29,285 532,1 505, 12,25 1,484 256, 21,0 24,7 61,400 135, 214, 37,413 38,882 130, 5,835 972, 500,( 19,30' 'Inactive. 2 Completed. 3 In addition, $8,695,438 expended from contributed funds, $1,126,905 estimated value of contributed lands, and $2,726,446 for relocations by local interests. a In addition, $1,484,613 expended from contributed funds, estimated value of $200,096 for contributed lands, and $202,456 for relocations by local interests. SIn addition, $71,370 expended from contibuted funds. 6 See Annual Report for 1983, Fort Worth District, page 16-12. ' In addition, $14,396,307 expended from contributed funds, estimated value of $1,224,219 for contributed lands, and contributed work in the amount of $1,070,806 by local interests. Work performed at 100% Local Sponsor expense was in the amount of $320,347. 8 In addition, $237,792 expended from contributed funds. 9 In addition, $92,920 expended from contributed funds. 'o In addition, $480,888 expended from contributed funds. " In addition, $16,976,675 expended from contributed funds. 12 In addition, $12,340,997 expended from contributed funds. 40-42 _ Cost to September 30, 1998 Operation and :ion Maintenance 300 - 400 - 8009 - 757 - 454 - 5,0423 - 8710 749 - 4,390 - ,6134 - 043 - )86 - 153 - ,292" 175 - 155s - ,2092 2,400 - 239 - ,927 - 300 - 000 - 7,100 - ___ GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT TABLE 40-E OTHER AUTHORIZED ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to September 30, 1998 Report See Annual Report Operation and Project For Construction Maintenance Salt Bayou, McFadden Ranch, TX 1997 1,754,000' - 'In addition, $576,877 expended from contibuted funds and and estimated value of contributed lands in the amount of $8,000. 40-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 40-F DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Date Federal Contributed Annual Report and Funds Funds Project For Authority Expended Expended Brazos River, TX, Velasco to Old Washington 1924 Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662 216,989' 223,010 17 Nov 1986 Liberty Local Protection Project, TX 1971 Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662 98,517------ 17 Nov 1986 Peyton Creek, TX 1975 Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662 66,377------ 17 Nov 1986 Sabine River and Tributaries, TX 1971 Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662 ------ ------ (Echo to Morgan Bluff) 17 Nov 1986 ' Includes $123,676 for previous projects. 40-44 GALVESTON. TEXAS. DISTRICT TABLE 40-G TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECTS See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funds New Work Maintenance Rehabilitation Sep. 30, 1998 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX 3. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX 5. Freeport Harbor, TX 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX 7. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and the Mexican Border 9. Houston Ship Channel, TX Regular Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Total cost of project Regular Channel Seawall Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Public Works Inland WW. Trust Fund Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total cost of project 11. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project 12. Texas City Channel, TX 13. Trinity River and Tributaries, TX Regular Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Contributed Total cost of project 24,418,127 2,848,560 10,500,076 37,766,763 75,775,642 324,287 6,143,152 82,243,849 1,716,695 276,720 84,237,264 64,416,932 116,575 20,811,568 85,340,506 360,249 85,700,755 11,920,187 8,754,209 0 3,648,932 24,323,328 123,563,860 466,477 28,607,566 4,920,904 157,558,807 395,000 139,776 158,093,583 29,042,293 2,612,932 1,382,760 33,037,985 49,592,331 1,363,652 2,103,435 53,059,418 32,000 116,760 53,208,178 14,653,853 136,296 1,023,819 15,813,968 68,555,945 66,000 68,621,945 57,393,804 0 1,352,092 58,745,896 117,981,642 0 1,057,677 119,039,319 0 0 119,039,319 73,805,545 0 229,311 74,034,856 0 74,034,856 111,241,926 512,163 13,121 2,963,102 114,730,312 429,156,085 0 0 1,120,477 430,276,562 0 0 430,276,562 182,261,387 0 426,583 182,687,970 224,363,772 0 5,169,188 229,532,960 0 0 229,532,960 29,171,995 0 0 29,171,995 21,351,065 0 21,351,065 2,170,080 0 0 2,170,080 3,576,684 00 3,576,684 0 0 3,576,684 8,935 0 0 8,935 0 8,935 7,373,356 595,973 0 0 7,969,329 3,398,500 0 2,958,225 0 6,356,725 0 0 6,356,725 726,158 0 0 726,158 0 0 0 83,982,011 2,848,560 11,852,168 98,682,739 197,333,968 324,287 7,200,829 204,859,852 1,716,695 276,720 206,853,267 138,231,412 116,575 21,040,879 159,384,297 360,249 159,744,546 130,535,469 9,862,345 13,121 6,612,034 147,022,969 556,118,445 466,477 31,565,791 6,041,381 594,192,094 395,000 139,776 594,726,870 211,303,680 2,612,932 1,809,343 215,725,955 273,956,103 1,363,652 7,272,623 282,592,378 32,000 116,760 282,741,138 44,552,006 136,296 1,023,819 45,712,121 89,907,010 66,000 89,973,010 40-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 40-H CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth in Feet Feet See (Below (Below Bottom Section Mean Low Bottom Mean Low Width Length in Text Project Section of Waterway Tide) Width (Feet) Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 2. Brazos Island Outer Bar and Jetty Channel Harbor, TX Padre Island to Long Island Long Island to Goose Island Goose Island to Turning Basin Extension Turning Basin Extension Brownsville Turning Basin Port Isabel Channel via East Turnout West Wye, from Brownsville Channel Port Isabel Turning Basin Fishing Boat Harbor: West Basin Middle Basin East Basin Connecting Channel Entrance Channel 3. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX 4. Double Bayou, TX Aransas Pass Outer Bar Channel Aransas Pass Jetty Channel Inner Basin at Harbor Island Channel to Port Aransas Port Aransas Turning Basin Anchorage Basin at Port Aransas Inner Basin to Mile 8.5 Mile 8.5 to LaQuinta Junction LaQuinta Junction to Corpus Christi Turning Basin Corpus Christi Turning Basin Industrial Canal Avery Point Turning Basin Channel to Chemical Turning Basin Chemical Turning Basin Tule Lake Channel Tule Lake Turning Basin Viola Channel Viola Turning Basin Channel to LaQuinta LaQuinta Turning Basin Turning Point at LaQuinta Channel Junction Jewel Fulton Canal Jewel Fulton Turning Basin Mooring Area at Ingleside: Mooring Area (a) Mooring Area (b) Double Bayou Channel: Mouth to 7-foot contour in Trinity Bay West Fork 44 42 42 42 42 36 36 36 36 15 15 15 15 15 47 45 45 12 12 12 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 12 12 45 45 77 400 250 250 300 325 1,200 200 200 200-1,000 370-305 370-305 370 270 100 700 600-730 730-1,720 100-150 200-4002 300-400 600-500 500 400 800 400 975 400 1,200 s 300 1,200 300-350 1,200 300-400 1,200 1,2503 100 200 150 150 125 100 44 42 42 42 42 36 36 36 36 15 15 15 15 15 47 45 45 12 12 400 250 250 300 375 660-1,200 200 200 200-1,000 370-305 370-305 370 265 100 700 600 Irregular 100 2002 12 300-400 45 600-500 45 40-45 45 45 45 45 45 40 40 40 40 45 45 45 12 12 45 7 77 500 400 1,000 400 1,000 350 1,050 s 200 900 200-250 700-900 300-400 1,200 1,2503 100 200 150 2.5 2.1 9.6 3.2 1.3 2,670 0.5 1.4 0.8 1,300 0.2 1,470 0.3 1,200 0.2 1,410 0.3 1,230 0.2 770 0.1 1,550 200 5,423 1,150 0.6 1,690 0.3 3.1 1,000 0.2 1.8 1,000 0.2 5.6 800 0.1 1,250 0.2 - 0.8 400 0.1 - 0.8 125 - 3.9 100 - 2.0 40-46 1.8 1.0 0.1 900 0.2 8.5 3.6 8.6 1.0 1.1 0.2 TABLE 40-H GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth in Feet Feet See (Below (Below Bottom Section Mean Low Bottom Mean Low Width Length in TextProject Section of Waterway Tide) Width (Feet) Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 5. Freeport Outer Bar Channel Harbor, TX Jetty Channel Quintana Turning Basin Channel to Brazosport Turning Basin Brazosport Turning Basin Channel to Upper Turning Basin Upper Turning Basin Channel to Stauffer Chemical Plant Stauffer Turning Basin Brazos Harbor Channel Brazos Harbor Turning Basin 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX Entrance Channel Outer Bar Channel Inner Bar Channel Anchorage Basin Bolivar Roads Channel Bolivar Roads Channel to 43rd St. 47 45 45 400 400 7504 45 400 45 1,0004 45 285-375 45 1,200' 30 30 36 36 52 52 50 36 50 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 36 36 10 40 40 40 40 40 8 10 10 40 15 9. Houston Ship Bolivar Roads to Morgan Channel, TX Point Morgan Point to Boggy Bayou Boggy Bayou to Greens Bayou Greens Bayou to Sims Bayou Hunting Bayou Turning Point Clinton Island Turning Basin Sims Bayou to Southern Pacific Slip Southern Pacific Slip to Houston Turning Basin Houston Turning Basin Upper Turning Basin Brady Island Channel Barbour Terminal Channel Turning Basin Bayport Ship Channel Turning Basin Anchorage Area Five-Mile Cut Channel Light-Draft Channel: Upper Turning Basin to Jensen Drive Turkey Bend Channel Greens Bayou Channel: Mile 0 to Mile 0.36 Mile 0.36 to Mile 1.57 200 500 200 750 800 800 800 2,875' 800 1,125 400 400 300 300 900-1,0009 8009 300 300 400-1,000 150 60 300 2,000 300 1,600 150 125 47 45 300 200 - 45 390 45 1000 45 285-375 45 1200' 30 25 30 30 42 42 40 36 40 40 200 500 200 7504 800 800 800 2,875 800 1,125 40 400 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 36 36 10 40 40 40 40 40 8 10 10 40 15 60 60 175 100 400 300 300 948-1,0009 965-1,0709 300 300 400-1,000 150 60 300 2,000 300 1,600 150 125 60 60 175 100 40-47 3.0 0.8 - 1.2 667 0.1 - 1.4 800 0.1 - 1.1 500 0.1 - 0.5 675 0.1 - 4.7 - 1.7 - 3.2 - 1.8' - 1.0 - 3.9 - 26.2 - 12.8 - 2.4 - 5.3 1,375 - 1,592 - - 0.6 - 2.9 3,100 0.6 1,000 0.2 - 0.9 - 3.1 2,000 0.4 - 3.8 1,000 0.3 - 1.9 - 4.1 - 0.8 - 0.3 - 1.3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 40-H CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth in Feet Feet See (Below (Below Bottom Section Mean Low Bottom Mean Low Width Length in TextProject Section of Waterway Tide) Width (Feet) Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 10. Matagorda Ship Channel, TX 11. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX Outer Bar and Jetty Channel Channel to Point Comfort Approach Channel to Turning Basin Turning Basin Channel to Port Lavaca Lynn Bayou Turning Basin Channel to Harbor of Refuge North-South Basin East-West Basin Channel to Red Bluff Sabine Bank Channel Sabine Pass Outer Bar Channel Sabine Pass Jetty Channel Sabine Pass Anchorage Basin Sabine Pass Channel Port Arthur Canal Entrance to Port Arthur Turning Basins Port Arthur East Turning Basin Port Arthur West Turning Basin Channel connecting Port Arthur West and Taylors Bayou Turning Basins Taylors Bayou Turning Basin Sabine-Neches Canal, Port Arthur Canal to Neches River Turning Point at Mile 19.5 Neches River, Mouth to Maneuvering Area Beaumont Turning Basin Turning Point, Mile 31.1 Turning Point, Mile 36.6 Turning Point, Mile 40.3 Channel Extension, Mile40.3 Maneuvering Area at Beaumont Turning Basin Beaumont Turning Basin Beaumont Turning Basin Extension Beaumont Turning Basin Extension to End of Project Channel Vicinity Bethlehem Steel Company Sabine-Neches Canal, Neches River to Sabine River Sabine River Channel, Mouth to Foot of Green Ave. Orange Turning Basin Orange Municipal Slip Old Channel Around Harbor Island Channel to Echo7 Adams Bayou Cow Bayou Orangefield Turning Basin 38 36 36 36 12 12 12 12 12 6 42 42 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 38 36 36 36 12 12 12 12 12 6 300 300-2006 200-300 1,000 125 27-340 125 300 250 100 800 800 800-500 1,500 500 500 275-678 420 600 40 200-250 40 150-1,000 40 40 400 9004 40 400 40 1,000� 40 1,0004 40 1,0004 36 350 40 Irregular 34 500 34 30 30 30 30 30 25 12 12 13 13 350 200 200 200 Irregular 200 150-200 125 100 100 300 300 300-2006 200-300 1,000 125 27-340 125 300 250 100 42 800 42 800 40 800-500 40 1,500 40 500 40 500 40 275-678 40 370-547 40 350-550 40 200-250 40 90-1,233 40 400 40 900� 40 40 40 40 36 40 34 34 30 30 30 30 30 25 12 13 13 400 1,000 1,000 1,300 350 Irregular 160-535 300 200 200 200 Irregular 150-200 150-200 100 100 300 40-48 - 3.2 - 20.9 - 1.1 1,000 0.2 - 4.1 532 0.1 - 1.9 1,682 0.3 1,750 0.3 - 20.2 - 14.7 - 3.4 - 4.1 3,000 - - 5.6 - 6.2 - 0.3 1,765 0.3 1,610 0.3 - 0.6 3,470 0.7 - 11.2 s - 18.3 700 s 930 s 1,530 s 1,265 0.2 1,300 0.2 1,500 0.3 - 0.4 - 0.7 - 4.4 1,550 2,435 500 9.5 0.3 0.5 2.4 1.7 7.0 0.1 GALVESTON. TEXAS. DISTRICT TABLE 40-H CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth ln Feet Feet See (Below (Below Bottom Section Mean Low Bottom Mean Low Width Length in TextProject Section of Waterway Tide) Width (Feet) Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 12. Texas City Texas City Channel 40 400 40 400 - 6.8 Channel, TX Turning Basin 40 1,000-1,200 40 1,000 4,253 .8 Industrial Barge Canal:' 0 Channel from Texas City Turning Basin to Mile 1.7 40 300-400 - - - - Turning Basin 40 1,000 - - - - 13. Trinity River Multiple Purpose Channel Channel, TX to Fort Worth" 12 200 - - - - Channel to Liberty'2 9 150 6 100 - 41.4 Anahuac Channel 6 100 6 100 - 5.8 Average. Includes 100-foot channel width. Includes 450-foot channel to Corpus Christi. Diameter. Includes 350-foot channel width. 300-foot width through Matagorda Peninsula. Deauthorized. Included in channel length. Includes 300-foot channel width. 1o Channel dredged 34 feet deep by 250-200 feet wide by 9,908 feet long and basin 34 feet deep by 1,000 feet wide by 1,150 feet long by local interests. " Not constructed. 12 9-foot by 150-foot channel completed from Houston Ship Channel to a point one mile below Anahuac, a distance of 23 miles. Upper end not connected to river channel to prevent salt intrusion into river. River channel maintained at 6 by 100-foot from mouth to Liberty, Texas. 40-49 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY APALACHEE BAY, FLORIDA TO MEXICAN BORDER EXISTING PROJECT DIMENSIONS, PROVIDED TABLE 40-I FOR IN TRIBUTARY CHANNELS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth in Feet (Below Bottom Feet (Below Mean Low Width Mean Low Bottom Length Tributary Channel Tide) (Feet) Tide) Width (Feet) Feet Miles Offats Bayou Main Channel West Wye Chocolate Bayou Channel 12-Foot Channel via East Turnout 2 West Turnout 3 9-Foot Channel 4 Turning Basin San Bernard River Channel 5 Colorado River Channel 6 Turning Basin Silting Basin Mouth of Colorado River ' Navigation Channel, GIWW to Gulf Turning Basin at Matagorda Channel to Palacios s Turning Basin No. I1 Turning Basin No. 2 Connecting Channel Channel to Barroom Bay 9 Channel to Victoria Main Channel via East Turnout Turning Basin West Turnout Channel Channel to Seadrift via South Turnout Turning Basin North Turnout Channel Harbor of Refuge at Seadrift Channel Basin Channel to Rockport Turning Basin Channel to Aransas Pass Turning Basin Channel to Conn Brown Harbor Conn Brown Harbor Channel to Port Mansfield o Entrance Channel Approach Channel to Hopper Dredge Turning Basin Hopper Dredge Turning Basin Channel Across Padre Island and Laguna Madre Turnout Channels, East Side of Main Channel, GIWW North Turnout South Turnout Channel West Side of Main Channel, GIWW, to P.T. of Turnout Channels Turnout Channels, West Side of Main Channel, GIWW North Turnout South Turnout Channel from P.T. of Turnout Channels to Approach Channel to Main Turning Basin Approach Channel to Main Turning Basin Main Turning Basin Turning Basin Extension Small Craft Basin Shrimp Basin 12 12 12 12 99 99 9 9 15-12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 9999 999 14 14 14 14 16 16 16. 14 12 12 14 12 12 14 14 14 14 8 12 125 125 125 125 100 600 100 100 400 150 100-200-300 350 125 200 300 150-480 60 125 600(Avci 125 100 250 100 100 200 200 475 175 300 125 300 12 125 12 125 12 12 999 9 15-20 12 12 12 12 12 9 12 99 9 99 14 14 14 14 250 100 300 100 100 100 100 16 16 16 14 12 12 14 200 200 125 200 400 1,000 160 350 125 125 100 100 400 150 100-200-300 125 200 300 130-400 125 SO(Av) 125 100 200 100 200 342(vc, 125-175 300 0.2 300 250 100 300 100 100 100 100 12 200 12 200 14 14 14 14 8 12 125 200 400 1,000 160 350 2,200 500 635 1,130 800nvo) 230 1,225 2,212 125 1,800 2.3 0.4 8.2 0.8 26.0 15.5 0.1 1.0 - - 16.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 - 34.8 0.1 0.8 2.0 0.5 - 2.1 0.2 6.1 0.4 0.3 - 0.8 - 0.4 300 0.1 - 7.7 - 0.6 - 0.6 - 0.6 - 0.6 - 0.6 1,250 580 860 1,450 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 40-50 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY APALACHEE BAY, FLORIDA TO MEXICAN BORDER EXISTING PROJECT DIMENSIONS, PROVIDED TABLE 40-I FOR IN TRIBUTARY CHANNELS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth in Feet (Below Bottom Feet (Below Mean Low Width Mean Low Bottom Length Tributary Channel Tide) (Feet) Tide) Width (Feet) Feet Miles Channel to Harlingen via South Turnout from Main Channel, GIWW 12 125 12 125" - 25.812 Turning Basin near Rio Hondo 12 400 12 400 500 0.1 North Turnout from Main Channel 12 200 12 200 - 0.7 Port Isabel Side Channels Main Channel 12 125 12 125-90 - 0.6 Main Channel 12 233-60 12 233-60 - 0.4 South Leg 12 125 12 125 - 0.2 Port Isabel Small Boat Harbor Entrance Channel 7 75 7 75 - 1.4 Harbor Channel 6 50 6 50 - 0.3 Boat Basin 6 Variable 6 72-501 1,308 0.2 Includes the construction of a salt water barrier at Mile 16.9. 2 Constructed 10 feet deep by 100 feet wide by local interests. East turnout channel constructed 150 feet wide. 3 Constructed by local interests. 4 Authorized to mile 13.2. Mile 8.2 to Mile 13.2 was deauthorized. s Authorized to Mile 31 above mouth (channel mile 29.41). Upper 3.4 miles was deauthorized under Section 12 of PL 93-251. 6 Includes a discharge channel from Matagorda, Texas, to the gulf which was dredged by local interests in 1939. (Maintenance will be discontinued upon completion of improvements authorized by R&H Act of 1968.) SAuthorized by R&H Act of 1968. Also provides for a dam across the present discharge channel, a new 250-foot wide by 20 to 23-feet deep discharge channel into Matagorda Bay, and a 15-foot by 200-foot wide entrance channel with parallel jetties from the gulf shoreline into the Gulf of Mexico. East jetty to be 3,500 feet long and west jetty 2,900 feet long. a Includes two protective breakwaters at entrance to turning basins. 9 In the inactive category for maintenance. to Also provides for two stone jetties at the gulf entrance about 1,000 feet apart. (North jetty constructed 2,300 feet long and south jetty constructed 2,270 feet long.) � South turnout is 200 feet wide. 12 Authorized to mile 31. Mile 25.8 to Mile 31 was deauthorized. 40-51 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 40-J DREDGING OPERATIONS See Cubic Section Yards of in Text Project Description Period Materials FY 98 Cost Brazos Island Harbor, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Brownsville Ship Channel June 16, 1998 to October23, 1998 1,593,894 $1,739,623 Corpus Christ Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Beacon 82 thru Viola Turning Basin May 13, 1998 to September 30, 1998 1,327,700 $3,302,802 Freeport Harbor, TX (New Work) Dredging Freeport Harbor - Bend Easing (45' project) October 1, 1997 to June 28, 1998 1,178,668 $2,379,010 Freeport Harbor, TX (Maintenance) Emergency Dredging Freeport Entrance Channel and Jetty Channels October 1, 1997 to April 3, 1998 1,053,157 $1,507,194 Dredging Inside Channels, Freeport Harabor August 31, 1998 to September 30, 1998 0 $100,000 Dredging Entrance and Jetty Channels September 23, 1998 to September 30, 1998 711,000 $300,000 Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Bolivar Roads to Pier B and Coast Guard Facility October 1, 1997 to May 27, 1998 5,148,722 $4,001,112 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, TX Channel to Victoria (New Work) Dredging Channel to Victoria Stations 600+00 to 835+00 February 6, 1998 to September 30, 1998 144,460 $1,159,628 Channel to Victoria (Maintenance) Dredging Channel to Victoria October 1, 1997 to July 19, 1998 963,000 $5,201,665 GIWW- Main Channel (Maintenance) Dredging Port Isabel to Arroyo Colorado July 8, 1998 to September 30, 1998 512,000 $1,870,565 Dredging GIWW Main Channel across Aransas Bay July 20, 1998 to September 30, 1998 914,480 $598,559 Dredging Brazos River Crossing to Boggy Bayou July 21, 1997 to June 29, 1998 219,877 $480,632 Emergency Dredging Colorado River and Basins October 1, 1997 to January 27, 1998 200,386 $537,139 Channel to Harlingen (Maintenance) Dredging Channel to Harlingen and Port Isabel Small Boat Harbor Channel October 1, 1997 to July 14, 1998 810,000 $1,820,796 Mouth of Colorado River (Maintenance) Dredging Mouth of Colorado River October 1, 1997 to June 29, 1998 238,790 $886,293 Houston-Galveston Navigation Channels, TX (New Work) Dredging Entrance Channel August 7, 1998 to September 30, 1998 0 $500,000 40-52 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT DREDGING OPERATIONS See Cubic Section Yards of in Text Project Descrintion Period Materials FY 98 Cost Houston Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Morgans Point to Carpenter Bayou October 1, 1997 to July 14, 1998 1,979,017 42,969,586 Dredging Sims Bayou Turning Basin and Light Draft Channel October 1, 1997 to April 20, 1998 686,293 $4,157,719 Dredging Redfish Reef to Morgan Point December 24, 1997 to May 20, 1998 2,619,308 $3,949,561 Matagorda Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Matagorda Peninsula to Point Comfort October 23, 1997 to September 30, 1998 3,007,300 $1,802,117 Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Sabine-Neches Canal January 9, 1998 to April 27, 1998 2,072,000 $3,635,954 Dredging Sabine Pass, Jetty Channel and Outer Bar Channel July 30, 1998 to October 7, 1998 1,785,240 $1,962,720 Texas City Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Texas City Channel Turning Basin Industrial Canal September 17, 1998 to September 30, 1998 0 $50,000 Trinity River and Tributaries, TX (Maintenance) Emergency Dredging Channel to Liberty, Smith Point July 21, 1998 to September 30, 1998 70,000 $100,000 1 In addition $66,500 expended from contributed funds for borrow excavation. 2 In addition $1,297,118 expended from contributed funds. Partial cost incurred in FY 98 for moblization. 4 In addition $78,545 expended from U.S. Coast Guard funds and $640,519 expended from contributed funds for constructing levees for the Port of Galveston. FY 98. s In addition $128,848 expended contributed funds. 6 In addition $28,140 expended from contributed funds. ' An estimated expense for mobilzation was entered in a In addition $126,396 expended from contributed funds to maintain levees. 9' An estimated expense for mobilization was entered 40-53 TABLE 40-I MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION* The Mississippi. River Commission (MRC) was created by an act of Congress on Jun. 28, 1879. The Flood Control Act of May 15, 1928, authorized the Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries (MR&T) Project. The Commission consists of three officers of the Corps of Engineers, one from the former Coast and Geodetic Survey (presently the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), and three civilians, two of whom must be civil engineers. All members are appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. During the fiscal year the Commissioners were: MG Phillip R. Anderson, President Designee, Jul. 1997; Mr. Sam E. Angel, member designee; Mr. R. D. James, civil engineer, appointed Dec. 1, 1981; Mr. William Clifford Smith, member designee; MG Albert J. Genetti, Jr., appointed Oct. 9, 1992, Deputy Commander, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; RADM John C. Albright, Member, NOAA, appointed Dec. 26, 1995; BG Robert H. Griffin, Commander, Northwestern Division, member designee; and COL John F. Castonguay served as Secretary of the Commission. The MRC is charged, under direction of the Secretary of the Army and supervision of the Chief of Engineers, with prosecution of improvements for flood control of the Mississippi River and of its tributaries and outlets in its alluvial valley, so far as they are affected by Mississippi River backwater, between Head of Passes, LA (mile 0), and Cape Girardeau, MO (1,006 miles AHP-Lower Mississippi mileage terminates at mile 954 AHP), and with prosecution of improvements in the interest of navigation between Cairo, IL (954 miles AHP), and Baton Rouge, LA (234 miles AHP); and for stabilization of the lower 7 miles of the right bank of the Ohio River, to former mouth of Cache River. It also is charged with prosecution of certain flood control works on the Mississippi River and tributaries, as far as they are affected by backwater, between Cape Girardeau, MO, and Rock Island, IL (1,437 miles AHP), and with prosecution of improvements on designated tributaries and outlets below Cape Girardeau for flood control, navigation, major drainage, and related water uses. Authorized operations of the Commission below Cape Girardeau are conducted by District Engineers of New Orleans, Vicksburg, and Memphis Districts within the areas described below, in accordance with approved directives and programs and congressional appropriations therefore. New Orleans District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required from Head of Passes, mile 0 to 320 AHP, construction of three salinity-control structures for fish and wildlife enhancement, two in lower Mississippi River Delta region, and one in the Mississippi- Louisiana Estuarine Area; Bonnet Carre and Morganza Floodways; maintenance and improvements of Mississippi River navigation channel from Baton Rouge, LA (mile 234 AHP), to mile 320; Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp); navigation improvement of Atchafalaya and Old Rivers from Mississippi River to Morgan City; control of Old and Atchafalaya Rivers; Atchafalaya Basin Floodways; flood control and drainage improvements in Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, in Bayou des Glaises, and in Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area; flood protection in eastern Rapides and south-central Avoyelles Parishes, LA; and freshwater distribution from Atchafalaya River to Teche-Vermilion Basins. Vicksburg District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required from upper limits of New Orleans District (mile 320 AHP) in vicinity of Black Hawk, LA, to Coahoma-Bolivar County line, MS (mile 620 AHP) on left bank, and to vicinity of mouth of White River, AR (mile 599 AHP), on right bank including south bank Arkansas River levee to vicinity of Pine Bluff, AR, and north bank levee to vicinity of Tucker on left bank of Plum Bayou, AR; bank stabilization in lower 36.1 miles of Arkansas River; maintenance and improvement of Mississippi River navigation channel between miles 320 and * Authorizing legislation (Tables 41-D and 41-E is listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of the chapter. 41-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 599 AHP; Vicksburg and Greenville Harbors; specific fish and wildlife facilities in Tensas, Yazoo, and Big Sunflower Basins; a demonstration erosion control project in the Yazoo Basin; flood control and drainage improvements in Red River backwater area including leveed portions east and west of Black River and south of Red River; Jonesville, LA, Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, Bayou Macon Basins and tributaries, AR and LA, and Bayou Lafourche, LA; Yazoo River Basin, MS, including backwater area; Big and Little Sunflower Rivers, Deer Creek, and Steele Bayou, MS; and Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR, including provision for agricultural water supply. Memphis District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required, from upper limits of Vicksburg District to north bank of Little River diversion channel, MO (1,003 miles AHP), a few miles below Cape Girardeau, MO, on right bank, and to Cache River diversion channel (967 miles AHP) above Cairo, IL, on left bank, including levees and revetment on right bank of Ohio River, in Mounds-Mound City area, IL; except operations above Cairo, IL, do not include channel stabilization on the Mississippi River. Maintenance and improvement of Mississippi River navigation channel between mile 599 and 954 AHP and of Memphis Harbor, TN; specific fish and wildlife facilities in St. Francis Basin; levees in White River backwater area up to vicinity of Augusta, AR, and a pumping plant near mouth of White River; levees and pumping plants at De Valls Bluff and Des Arc, AR; channel improvements in Cache River Basin, AR; channel improvements in Big Creek and tributaries, AR; improvement works in St. Francis River Basin, MO and AR, including backwater area improvements in Belle Fountain Ditch and Drainage District No. 17, AR; Little River diversion channel, MO, and L-Anguille River, AR; Wolf River Basin, TN; Obion and Forked Deer River Basins, TN; Reelfoot Lake area, including channel improvement for Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9, TN and KY; West Kentucky tributaries, KY; Mud Lake pumping station, TN; and pumping plants and outlet structures in the Cairo-Mounds-Mounds City area, IL. Channel improvements to Eight Mile Creek, Arkansas; Whiteman's Creek Ten Mile and Fifteen Mile Bayous in West Memphis, and vicinity Arkansas; Horn Lake Creek and Tributaries, Mississippi; and Nonconnah Creek, Tennessee and Mississippi. Navigation channel and harbor improvements to Helena Harbor and vicinity, Arkansas at Mississippi River, mile 652 AHP. Channel improvements and pumping station for Helena, Phillips County,and vicinity, Arkansas and St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, Missouri. Field operations of the commission restricted to levee construction under Sec. 6, 1928 Flood Control Act (local interests contributing one-third of costs and furnishing rights-of-way) are conducted within the following limits by two districts reporting directly to the Commission on matters within their jurisdiction-St. Louis District: Mississippi River (Sec. 6) levees from upper limits of Memphis District to Clemens Station, MO (1,254 miles AHP), on right bank, and Hamburg Bay, IL (1,215 miles AHP), on left bank, and Illinois River from its mouth to mile 120 at Havana, IL. Rock Island District: Mississippi River (Sec. 6) levees from upper limits of St. Louis District to Rock Island, IL (1,437 miles AHP). For work accomplished see Table 42-N, page 42-50, Annual Report for 1975. MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ALLUVIAL VALLEY BELOW CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO Location and description. The Mississippi River rises in Lake Itasca, MN, and flows generally southerly for 2,340 miles through the central portion of United States to empty into the Gulf of Mexico 115 miles below New Orleans. It is improved for barge navigation for 1,832 miles to Minneapolis, MN. The Mississippi River and its major tributaries, the Missouri, Ohio, St. Francis, White, Arkansas, Yazoo, and Red-Old Rivers, drain 1,245,000 square miles in all or part of 31 states between the Rocky and Appalachian Mountains and part of two Canadian provinces. Below Cape Girardeau, MO, 53 miles above Ohio River, river bottomlands widen abruptly into an alluvial valley of 35,460 square miles which was originally subjected to flood overflow. A major part of the alluvial valley has been protected from floods by levees which confine floodflows within a floodplain having an average width of 5 miles. (See map of alluvial valley of Mississippi River, scale 1:500,000.) Observations made by Mississippi River Commission to Sep. 30, 1982, show approximate all-time maximum and minimum discharges between levees as follows: Cairo to White River, 2,000,000 and 70,000 cubic feet per second; thence to Red River, 2,150,000 and 90,000 cubic feet per second; thence to the Gulf of Mexico, 1,500,000 and 50,000 cubic feet per second in Mississippi River and 660,000 and 11,000 cubic feet per second in Atchafalaya River. As the 1927 floodflow was not confined between levees, maximum discharges recorded do not include entire flow of the 1927 flood, maximum of record below White River. High water and flood stages usually occur in late winter or early spring, but great floods such as that of 1937 occurred as early as 41-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION January. Low water stages generally prevail from August to December. Extreme all-time high in stages recorded at representative gages (rounded to nearest foot) are 60 feet at Cairo, 49 feet at Memphis, 61 feet at Red River Landing, and 21 feet at New Orleans (Carrollton). The river is nontidal above Red River Landing where tidal amplitude rarely exceeds 0.1 foot during extreme low water. Previous projects. For details see page 1944, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. The Mississippi River and Tributaries Project in the alluvial valley between Head of Passes, LA, and Cape Girardeau, MO, provides protection from floods by means of levees, floodwalls, floodways, reservoirs (in Yazoo and St. Francis Basins), bank stabilization, and channel improvements in and along the river and its tributaries and outlets insofar as affected by backwater of Mississippi River, including levee work on the main stem between Cape Girardeau and Rock Island. When completed, 23,621 square miles will be protected from the Mississippi River project flood. The project also provides for a 12- by 300-foot navigation channel between Baton Rouge, LA, and Cairo, IL; for salinity-control structures; and for channel realignment and improvement including bank stabilization and dikes to reduce flood heights, control natural tendency of river to lengthen by meandering, and protect levees from being destroyed by caving banks. Locations of major main stem Mississippi River improvements are shown in Table 41-A and those for off-main stem tributaries are shown in Table 41-B. Pertinent data on dams and lakes are shown in Table 41-C. Authorizing and incorporating legislation are shown in Tables 41-D and 41-E. Summary of presently estimated Federal cost of authorized improvements is shown in Table 41-F. Construction of the existing project began in 1928 and has continued throughout ensuing years. Through Sep. 30, 1997, physical completion of the entire project is 86.1 percent. Recommended modifications. None. Local cooperation. The Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended, applies. Such requirements have, in general, been complied with by local interests. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 21, 1990, for Ports of Baton Rouge and Lake Charles, LA; Port Series No. 20, 1990, for Port of New Orleans, LA; also folio of Flood Control and Navigation Maps of Mississippi River from Cairo, IL, to the Gulf of Mexico (59th edition), 1992. Project cost. Total allotted for flood control, excluding maintenance charges through Aug. 18, 1941, chargeable under authorizations to Sep. 30, 1998, was $6,553,100,157 (See Table 41-V.) (See also Tables 41-U, 41-W, and 41-X for additional financial statements. The 3 5 2 nd Session was held on Mar. 30 to Apr. 3 on board the Motor Vessel MISSISSIPPI enroute on the Mississippi River from Cairo, IL, to New Orleans, LA. Bank protection works, levees, and channel conditions were observed enroute. Public meetings were held at Cairo, IL; Memphis, TN; Greenville, MS; and New Orleans, LA, with approximately 320 people in attendance. This session was adjourned in New Orleans, LA, at 10:55 on Apr. 3, 1998. The 3 5 3 rd Session was held on Aug. 17-28, 1998, on board the Motor Vessel MISSISSIPPI. Public meetings were held at Red Wing, MN; Burlington, IA; Melvin Price Locks and Dam, Alton, IL; Caruthersville, MO; Memphis, TN; Mayersville, MS, and Krotz Springs, LA. This session adjourned Aug. 27, 1998, at 6:00 p.m. in Morgan City, LA. Records of Proceedings of all sessions of the Mississippi River Commission are on file in the office of the President. Alluvial Valley Mapping General. Contoured quadrangles and general maps of the alluvial valley are available for departmental use and public distribution under prescribed regulations. Preparation, revision, and publication of quadrangle maps (scale 1:62,500) continued. Roadmap-type information brochures of principal portions of the overall project were published along with pamphlets on the subject of flood control and navigation. Maps and supplemental data sheets for active works were updated and published as required. The 1998, 61st edition of the folio of flood control and navigation maps (Scale 1:62,500) covering the Mississippi River and outlets was revised and printed in FY 1998. Approximately 1,100 flight-line miles of blackand- white aerial photography (various scales); 8,048 flight-line miles of color true photography; and 41-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 about 119.5 hours of oblique photography were flown along the Mississippi River and tributaries in the New Orleans, Vicksburg, and Memphis Districts. Work accomplished in the Districts: New Orleans District: The revision of 1:62,500 scale quadrangle maps Caminada Bay, LA was completed in 1998. Memphis District-Series conversion of U.S. Geological Survey 1:24,000-scale to 1:62,500-scale quads of New Madrid, MO; Portageville, MO were published in FY1998. Vicksburg District-Series Conversion of U.S. Geological Survey 1:24,000- of Lake Providence, LA-MS and Alsatia, LA-MS are in progress. Floods Streamflow observations during the fiscal year follow: Memphis District-Mississippi River crest stage of 51.2 feet at Cairo gage on Apr. 22, 1998, and maximum discharge of 1,197,000 cubic feet per second occurred at Hickman, KY on Apr. 23, 1998, a crest stage of 34.2 feet at Memphis on May 8-11, 1998, and a maximum discharge of 1,229,000 cubic feet per second at Memphis on May 8-11, 1998. Vicksburg District-The Mississippi River in the Vicksburg District - Peak stages and discharges on the Vicksburg District's reach of the Mississippi River were as follows: Arkansas City, 38.0 feet on Mar. 12, 1998, and maximum discharge of 1,310,000 cubic feet per second; Vicksburg, 43.6 feet on Aug. 14, 1998, and a maximum discharge of 1,360,000 cubic feet per second; and Natchez, 50.0 feet on Mar. 16, 1998, and maximum discharge of 1,320,000 cubic feet per second. New Orleans District-On the Mississippi River, the Red River Landing gage recorded a maximum stage of 53 feet NGVD on May 20, 1998, and the New Orleans gage recorded a maximum stage of 14.5 feet NGVD on May 20, 1998. On the Atchafalaya River, the Simmesport gage recorded a maximum stage of 35.1 feet NGVD on May 17, 1998. Studies and Investigations General investigations. Surveys and reports, authorized by laws and by Senate and House Public Works Committee resolutions, were made as required. Collection and study of basic data continued. The Energy and Water Development Appropriation Bill of 1990 directed the Corps to develop the most costeffective flood control plan for the City of West Memphis without regard to frequency of flooding, drainage area, and the amount of runoff. It also directed the Secretary of the Army to incorporate existing flood control features of the Bayou Rapides Drainage Structure and Pumping Plant into the Lower Red River, South Bank Levees portion of the MR&T Project. The FY 1994 Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act (Public Law 103-126), dated Oct. 28, 1993, includes authority to within available funds, investigate conditions at Wax Lake Outlet Bayou Black and other features, and recommend modifications desirable for flood protection, navigation, and environmental management. This effort is being conducted under the Lower Atchafalaya Basin Reevaluation Study which began in Dec. 94 and is scheduled to be completed in FY 2000. This study includes an extensive public involvement program, with the objective to promote public awareness and participation. A July 1997 resolution of the Committee of the Transportation and Infrastructure of the U.S. House of Representatives authorized a study of flooding and other problems west of the Atchafalaya Basin Floodway between Alexandria, LA, and the Gulf of Mexico. A reconnaissance study was initiated in FY 1998. Mississippi River and Tributaries Levees Operations and results during fiscal year. This feature consists of construction of new, and enlargement of existing, levees to approved grade and section; construction and restoration of levee berms; and construction, repair, and maintenance of roads on levees. Work accomplished is summarized in Table 41-N and further broken down as follows: New Orleans District-Enlarged 6.2 miles of levees in the Main Stem System. See Table 41-K. Vicksburg District-Constructed 8.1 miles of relief wells in the Main Stem System. See Table 41-L. Memphis District-Completed construction of 6.1 miles of seepage control measures in the Main Stem System. See Table 41-M. Condition as of Sep. 30. (See Tables 41-K, 41-L, 41-M, and 41-N.) There are 1,609.8 miles of levees authorized for the Mississippi River below Cape Girardeau, of which 1,603.0 are in place with 1,321.4 41-4 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION built to approved grade and section. The Main Stem Levee System consists of 2,203.6 miles, of which 2,196.8 are in place with 1,837.3 miles completed to approved grade and section. Included in this system are 85.4 miles of levees and structures along the south bank of Arkansas River miles (all completed); 59.2 along the south bank of Red River (all completed); and 449.2 miles in the Atchafalaya River Basin, with 449.2 miles in place and 371.3 miles completed to grade and section (see Table 41-N). Of the authorized 677.8 miles of berms, 558.3 are complete. Graveled or hard-surfaced roads have been constructed on 2,094.8 miles of these levees. There are an additional 1,511.0 miles of authorized tributary levees in the MR&T Project, of which 1,225.2 miles, are in place with 1,031.8 to approved grade and section. Berms have been completed on 15.3 miles and 916.2 miles of graveled or hard-surfaced roads have been constructed on the levees. For summary of levee work Table 41-N. A Supplement Ito the Final Environmental Impact Statement, Mississippi River and Tributaries, Mississippi River Levees and Channel Improvement, which was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality in April 1976 was prepared. The SEIS complies with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, subsequent implementing instructions, Engineer Regulations, and Consent Decree negotiated Jun. 16, 1997, with the Earthjustice Legal Defense Fund. The SEIS provides a description of the Mississippi River Mainline Levees Project from Cape Girardeau, Missouri, to Head of Passes, Louisiana, a distance of more than 900 miles of river. The SEIS evaluates impacts of all remaining levee and seepage control construction items scheduled for construction after FY 98. The SEIS discusses and evaluates the various alternatives of avoiding, minimizing, and mitigating for unavoidable adverse impacts to significant environmental resources during construction of the remaining levee items. Environmental impacts, both beneficial and adverse, are identified and unavoidable impacts described. Uncompensated losses are identified and compensatory mitigation needed to offset losses is detailed. Mississippi River and Tributaries-Channel Improvements Operations and results during fiscal year. Dredging: Mississippi River Main Stem-(See Table 41-G.) Work included dredging 14,299,800 cubic yards for maintenance of channel and harbor improvements. Minimum channel depth of 9 feet was maintained. Dredging was done with the following plant: Vicksburg District, channel maintenance was performed by government-owned dredge Jadwin. Memphis District channel maintenance dredging was performed by the Government-owned dustpan dredge Hurley. New Orleans district channel maintenance dredging was performed by government-owned dustpan dredge Jadwin. The MR&T Harbor maintained in Memphis District was Memphis Harbor (McKellar Lake), by leased cutterhead dredge Natchez. MR&T Harbors maintained in Vicksburg District were Greenville Harbor and Vicksburg by cutterhead dredge Marion. Bank revetment and dikes: (See Table 41-H, 41-I, and 41-J.) Construction of 3.10 miles of new bank revetment and 147,053 squares of concrete mattress, for maintenance, along the Mississippi River was completed by Government plant and hired labor. Also, 1.75 miles of new dikes were constructed and required maintenance was performed. Approximately 0.75 miles of new bank revetment was constructed on the Atchafalaya River. Other work performed in the interest of navigation, supplementing maintenance dredging on Mississippi River between Cairo, IL, and Baton Rouge, LA, included removal of snags, wrecks, and obstructions; issuance of bulletins by the Vicksburg District providing information on available high-water velocities at selected locations; maintenance of bulletin boards showing daily gage readings at regular MRC gages; and contact pilot service furnishing navigation interests with latest information and advice on channel conditions and navigation interests. Cost of this work is given in Table 41-U. Condition as of Sep. 30. In carrying out authorized channel improvement program between 41-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Baton Rouge and Cairo, 16 cutoffs were developed between 1933 and 1942. These, combined with chute channel development and alignment improvements, decreased channel length between these cities by about 170 miles. However, current velocities increased the attack on the banks and the river began to regain its length. As a result, the net shortening between 1933 and 1962 was 114 miles of the theoretical 170-mile cutoff. There are now in place 1,027.3 miles of operative bank revetment and 298.2 miles of dikes on the lower Mississippi River. This amount of channel stabilization should prevent the river from regaining much more of its length due to meandering. A navigation channel 9 by 300 feet is being accomplished by revetment and dikes and maintained by dredging as required during the low-water season. Due to growing effectiveness of channel improvement program, average maintenance dredging requirements are steadily being reduced, and an increase in navigable depth is being obtained. Approximately 141.1 miles of foreshore protection have been constructed along the lower Mississippi River. There are 82.8 miles of revetment and 5.7 miles of dikes on tributary channels as listed in Tables 41-H, 41-I, and 41-J. New Orleans District ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor: Real estate activities and planning for construction were continued. Construction of levee enlargements and floodwalls continued on the east and west protection levees, and levees west of Berwick. In FY 98, one contract was awarded (W95 levee Enlargement) and two other contracts were completed (E96/99 Erosion Protection Phase I and W40 levee enlargement). Maintenance by hired labor: Operation and maintenance of Bayou Boeuf, Berwick, and Bayou Sorrel Locks, Morganza Control Structure, condition and operation studies, and water control management activities were continued. Completed the new shops building contract at Bayou Boeuf Lock in FY 98. A contract for SE guidewall replacement at Bayou Sorrell continued in FY 98 and will be completed in FY 99. Maintenance dredging was performed, resulting in the removal of 2,550,000 cubic yards by two leased cutterhead dredges from Berwick Bay Harbor at a total cost of $2,159,760. Another contract was awarded for $130,726 to remove 68,103 cubic yards at Three Rivers. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated Aug. 7, 1929, with commencement of the west protection levee from Bordelonville to Hamburg, LA. The project is 92 percent complete. The current estimated Federal cost is $1,720,000,000 and non-Federal cost is $8,000,000. Of the 449.2 miles of levees and floodwalls authorized for the Atchafalaya system, 371.3 miles are built to grade. See Table 41-K for status of levees. Construction of the first 2.5 miles of the proposed 5 miles of channel was initiated in January 1958 and completed in July 1959, with 7,458,086 cubic yards excavated. The remaining 2.5 miles were to be constructed when development of the initially constructed portion warrants expansion. Project expansion has not been necessary. Therfore this feature was deauthorized on Nov. 2, 1979, under the provisions of Section 12, Public Law 93-251 (WRDA 74), as amended. Major items remaining to be completed include completion of levees to grade and section, channel training works below Morgan City, modification of existing structures and construction of two freshwater distribution structures. Approximately 51.2 miles of bank stabilization have been placed as shown in Table 41-H. Flood Control ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA Location. The project lies in the lower part of the Atchafalaya Basin which is situated in south-central Louisiana. It lies in parts of Iberville, Iberia, Point Coupee, St. Martin, St. Mary and St. Landry Parishes. Further, it is limited to the part of the Atchafalaya River Basin that has been confined between protection or guide levees that are about 15 miles apart. The northern boundary, west of the Atchafalaya River, lies along the south right-of-way line for the Union Pacific Railroad near the south side of U.S. Highway 190 41-6 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION between the West Atchafalaya Basin Protection Levee (WABPL) and the west limits of the Town of Krotz Springs, thence southerly along the west limits of the town and easterly along the south limits of the town to the Atchafalaya River; east of the Atchafalaya River it lies along the southern right-of-way line for the Union Pacific Railroad. The eastern and western boundaries lie at the floodside toes of the East Atchafalaya Basin Protection Levee (EABPL) and WABPL, respectively. The area within these limits has been calculated at about 595,000 acres. Existing Project. This project consists of the acquisition of 50,000 acres of fee title, excluding minerals, from willing sellers and 338,000 acres of easements including: (1) flowage easements; (2) flowage, developmental control and environmental protection easements; and (3) developmental control and environmental protection easements. All acquisition is over privately owned land. The state will provide its 150,000 acres of existing lands and also about 30,000 acres of land donated by the Dow Chemical Company to accomplish the project features. Other state and Federal lands in the project area include 15,000 acres acquired by the Department of Interior for the Atchafalaya National Wildlife Refuge and 12,000 acres acquired by the State for the Sherburne Wildlife Management Area. Additionally, the project includes features to protect and improve the environmental resources of the area and to provide for improved recreational use. To date approximately 33,000 acres of fee and 139,000 acres of easements have been acquired. Local Cooperation: A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) is not required for the acquisition of flowage, developmental control and environmental protection easements nor for acquisition of the public access lands (fee). A PCA will be required for the unscheduled work, such as the Operations and Maintenance and Recreation features. One recreational feature, the Simmesport boat launch and appurtenant facilities, has been approved for construction. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year 98: During FY 98, more restrictive easements were acquired over 73,500 acres. Approximately 650 acres of additional fee were negotiated in FY 98. Conditions as of Sep 30. In FY 99, approximately 76,000 acres of easements and approximately 17,000 acres will be acquired, funds permitting. Additionally, road easements will be negotiated over 6 ownerships to provide access to previously-acquired fee lands. BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of water control management. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in June 1946 and is 57 percent complete, based on the current estimated Federal cost of $20,400,000 and non-Federal cost of $323,000. See page 2031, Annual Report for 1961, for description of completed work. Work required to complete the project consists of enlargement of 13.5 miles of upper Bayou Boeuf, channel improvement of 25.3 miles of Bayou Cocodrie, enlargement of Bayou Courtableau from Washington, LA, to the west protection levee, and additional culverts through the west protection levee at 100 percent Federal cost in lieu of the previously authorized diversion channel from Washington to the Bayou Courtableau drainage structure. With the termination of the Eastern Rapides and South Central Avoyelles project, it has become necessary to provide an adequate outlet structure solely for the Bayou Cocodrie and Tributaries project. The economic effects of this change along with current benefits estimates have caused the benefit-cost ratio for the project to be less than unity. As a result, the project has now been classified as inactive. If economic conditions change, the project could be reactivated. BONNET CARRE' SPILLWAY, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor: Condition and operation studies, water control management, and ordinary maintenance of the control structure and spillway continued. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of the spillway was initiated in FY 1929. The control structure was completed in 1931, levees were completed in 1932, and utility crossings were completed in 1936. The cost of the completed work is $14,212,200. It was necessary to operate the structure to reduce flood stages in 1937, 1945, 1950, 1973, 1975, 1979, 41-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 1983 and 1997. The structure was operated in 1994 to transfer fresh water from the Mississippi River to Lake Pontchartrain. The structure was operated for one month from March 17-April 17, 1997, to reduce flood stages. Needle replacement began in FY 96 with the purchase of about 625 needles for $80,000. The total replacement quantity required is approximately 7,000. An additional cable security system has been installed through needle eyes to prevent needles from dislodging during severe storms. OLD RIVER, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of operation and maintenance of the lock and control structures as required, condition and operation studies, water control management, maintenance of cleared areas, levee shaping, and engineering studies. A picket boat was previously used at the inflow channels to the low sill and auxiliary control structures. It was removed from operation in FY 1988. Maintenance by contract: Maintenance dredging was performed in FY 1998 at the Old River Lock Tailbay and Forebay where approximately 190,722 cubic yards were removed at a cost of $389,299. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction began September 1955 and is complete at a Federal cost of $292,273,000. Principal items completed are as follows: Low-sill structure, June 1959; overbank structure, October 1959; auxiliary structure, September 1986; levees and levee enlargements, October 1963; inflow and outflow channels for the low-sill structure, February 1961; inflow and outflow channels for the auxiliary structure, August 1987; navigation lock completed December 1962 and opened to navigation March 1963, at which time Old River was closed to navigation with a rock and earthfill dam; highway approaches and bridge over the lock completed March 1965. Approximately 9.4 miles of bank protection have been constructed at the inflow and outflow channels. (See Table 41-H for details of bank protection.) LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY LEVEE, LOUISIANA Location. The project is located near Angola, LA, in West Feliciana Parish, approximately 40 miles northwest of Baton Rouge, LA, and borders the Louisiana State Penitentiary along the Mississippi River and State of Mississippi state line. Existing Project. The project provides for improving about 12 miles of existing levees along the Mississippi River which currently afford flood protection to the penitentiary on the left descending bank below Old River. The existing levees are owned and maintained by the State of Louisiana and are substandard with regard to Federal specifications. By improving the existing levees to Federal standards, the project will reduce the risk of flooding with its attendant property damage and threat to the lives of up to 5,000 inmates and about 1,750 employees and residents (527 reside on the penitentiary grounds). Funds to initiate preconstruction, engineering and design were appropriated in FY 91 and funds to initiate construction were appropriated in FY 98. Construction is scheduled to be initiated in FY 99. Local Cooperation. The potential local sponsor, the Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, the Louisiana State Penitentiary staff, Governor "Mike" Foster, and other Louisiana officials, are urging the Corps to initiate construction at the earliest opportunity since construction is estimated to span at least two high water seasons. The Louisiana Department of Public Safety has expressed strong support of project construction in writing and has indicated that $800,000 is available in the FY98-99 State Capital Outlay Bill to finance their share of the project cost. They fully understand the scope of the project and are capable of providing the necessary resources. The Limited Reevaluation Report (October 1998) is the basis for the execution of a Project Cooepration Agreement with the potential local sponsor. Execution of the Project Cooperation Agreement is scheduled for July 1999 after approval of the Limited Reevaluation Report. Vicksburg District LOWER ARKANSAS BASIN, AR Condition as of Sep. 30. Arkansas River levees. A total of 56.2 miles of the 61.5 miles of north bank levees and all of the 85.4 miles of south bank levees have been completed to approved grade and section. These levees above mile 36.1 are protected by bank-protection works constructed as a feature of project for Arkansas River and tributaries, AR and OK. For present status of this work, see report of Little Rock District. Below mile 36.1, needed bank 41-8 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION protection is constructed with project maintenance funds. Little Bayou Meto gates and lifting mechanism were replaced during FY 88. Big Bayou Meto Gate operating mechanisms replaced FY 94, 95, 96. LOWER RED RIVER SOUTH BANK RED RIVER LEVEES, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor consisted of engineering studies. A Project Management Plan to address replacement of the drainage structure and pumping plant was approved in Aug 94. A major maintenance report was prepared and approved Sep. 95 recommending replacement of the drainage structure. Design of the replacement structure is continuing. Construction is scheduled for initiation in late 1999. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of water control management and economic studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in FY 92 and is complete. All of the 59.2 miles of levees authorized are completed to approved grade and section. TENSAS BASIN, AR AND LA (a) Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, and Bayou Macon, AR and LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. Planning and design on project features are complete. The Lake Chicot Pumping Plant and related features are complete and in operation. No further work on the Tensas River Project (Separable Element) will be initiated due to lack of commitment from a local sponsor to cost share remaining E&D and construction. This project has been placed in the "inactive" category. Condition as of Sep. 30. Channel improvement has been accomplished on 741.7 miles of project streams, providing major drainage outlets for the tributary areas. Additionally, 61.0 miles of the Tensas River has been cleared and snagged. The GDM for the Tensas River Project, above mile 61, including Mill Bayou-Bayou Vidal is complete. However, no further work will be initiated due to lack of a local sponsor. (b) Red River backwater area. Operations and results during fiscal year. Planning and design continued on project features. All channel work required to get flows to the Tensas Cocodrie Pumping Plant and gravity structure is complete. The gravity structure and the pumping plant are complete and are being operated and maintained by contract. One mitigation item, the construction of two water control weirs, was completed in May 1988. Contracts for three additional mitigation features are complete. Construction of the Durham Prong mitigation feature is complete. Tensas-Cocodrie, Item 4-A, levee enlargement, 6.3 miles in length, was completed in September 1988, and Item 4-B, 2.4 miles of levee enlargement, was completed in October 1990. A contract for Item 2 was awarded in January 1991 and is physically complete. These contracts will complete the levee enlargement for all of the levee system, except 0.8 miles. Work on the Below Red River Phase II GDM has been reclassified as inactive. Design and construction of the Sicily Island Area Levee project is underway. Condition as of Sep. 30. Levees in Tensas- Cocodrie area are complete except for levee raising of 0.8 miles. The work comprised 93.1 miles of new levee, excluding 2.1 miles of high ground where no levees are required, and 86.9 miles of gravel road on levees. Construction of 63.4 miles of levee, Larto Lake to Jonesville levee system, has been completed. A levee grade reevaluation study for all levee systems in the Red River Backwater area was completed in Mar. 1985. Levee work on Sicily Island area consists of 56 miles of new levee, 2 pumping plants. 11 miles of channel work, and structural mitigation features. Levee items lA, 1B, 3A, 4A, 4B, 5A-R, and 5B and Bayou Louis weir and connecting channel are complete. Construction of Levee Items 3A and 3B, the Fool River Pump Plant, and the Haha Bayou Pump Plant are underway. YAZOO BASIN, MS Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Big Sunflower River, etc. The Project is authorized by the Flood Control Acts of 1944, 1946, 1950, 1962, and 1965. Construction of channel improvements on Steele Bayou, Main Canal and Black Bayou are underway. Construction on Steele Bayou Channel in the Swan Lake Area is being done in phases. Phase III is under construction and scheduled for completion in January 1998. Phase IV is scheduled for award in April 1998 followed by the final Phase V in FY 99. Channel improvements on Main Canal Item 1 were completed in May 1996. Relocation of facilities necessary to complete channel improvements 41-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 on Main Canal are underway. A construction contract for Main Canal Item 2 is scheduled for award in April 1998. Channel improvements on Black Bayou Item 1 were completed in October 1994. A construction contract for Black Bayou Item 2 was awarded in April 1997. A contract to complete Black Bayou Item is scheduled for award in October 1999. (b) Flood Control Reservoirs (1) Arkabutla Lake. (See Table 41-C.) The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Clearing of tributary streams in the lake area was continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 227.6 feet NGVD on May 5, 1998, and storage in flood control pool was 241,000 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow was 18,050 cubic feet per second on Apr. 30, 1998. On Sep. 30, 1998, the pool elevation was 217.2 feet NGVD, and storage in the flood control pool was 90,500 acre-feet. (2) Enid Lake. (See Table 41-C.) The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Rehabilitation of boat channels and snagging and clearing of tributary streams in the lake area continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 253 feet NGVD on Jun. 8, 1998, when storage in the flood control pool was 321,700 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow was 12,050 cubic feet per second on Apr. 29, 1998. On Sep. 30, 1998, pool elevation was 243.1 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 173,700 acre-feet. 4,500 ac. ft. of storage in conservation pool was reallocated to municipal and industrial water supply in June 1998. (3) Grenada Lake. (See Table 41-C.) Construction of remaining public-use facilities has been deferred pending development of cost-sharing agreements with local interests for construction and non-Federal operation and maintenance, consistent with projects for which recreation facilities are being constructed under the provisions of the Federal Water Project Recreational Act of 1965 (Public Law 89-72), as amended. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 216.2 feet NGVD on Jun. 8, 1998, when storage in the flood control pool was 593,500 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow was 23,380 cubic feet per second on Mar. 9, 1998. On Sep. 30, 1998, the pool elevation was 205.0 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 264,300 acre-feet. (4) Sardis Lake (See Table 41-C.) The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Clearing of tributary streams in the lake area continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 264.3 feet NGVD on May 11, 1998, when storage in the flood control pool was 762,400 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow was 32,100 cubic feet per second on Apr. 30, 1998. On Sep. 30, 1998, the pool elevation was 250.4 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 345,500 acre-feet. A construction contract was awarded for the seismic remediation of Sardis Dam utilizing driven pre-stressed concrete piling as a result of an extensive study and evaluation of the expected performance of the dam during a major earthquake in the New Madrid earthquake zone of the central United States. (c) Greenwood, Yazoo City and Belzoni protection works. Contract forces continued operation and maintenance of levees, drainage facilities, and pumping plant. (d) Main stem. Contract forces continued operation and maintenance of channels, levees, and drainage facilities. (e) Mississippi Delta, MS. Feasibility studies limited solely to flood control problems in the Big Sunflower River Basin, are complete. No economically feasible projects were identified. A negative feasibility report was forwarded to the Mississippi River Commission in September 1997. (f) Reformulation Study. The uncompleted portions of the Yazoo Basin construction program are being reformulated. This reformulation study includes investigations of the engineering, economic, and environmental aspects of the basin and is being accomplished in 4 phases. These studies will evaluate reasonable arrays of alternatives to the project features that remained after construction of items budgeted and scheduled for award in FY 90. The Upper Steele Bayou and Upper Yazoo Project reports were approved on May 25, 1993 and Jun. 21, 1994, respectively. Concerning the final 2 phases, the Yazoo Backwater Reformulation Study began in FY 93 and the Tributaries Reformulation study began in FY 95. The Backwater Study includes nonstructural, structural, and combination plans. Nonstructural features include conservation and water management easements and reforesting of cleared agricultural lands. Structural features include an array of various capacity pumping stations and a levee alternative. Current completion date is FY 99. The Yazoo Tributaries Reformulation Study is evaluating flood control requirements on nine project features. Study efforts were suspended in 1996 due to lack of funds. Therefore, completion date was delayed one year to FY 01. 41-10 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION (g) Demonstration Erosion Control. All construction under this feature is complete, and a final report was submitted to the Secretary of the Army Jan. 5, 1982. All work constructed has been turned over to the local sponsors for operation and maintenance except for the instrumented system on Goodwin Creek where the structures were retained for possible future studies. The Demonstration Erosion Control Project (DEC), a joint project with the USDA NRCS was initiated by FY 85 appropriations as a continuation on streambank erosion control efforts. The purpose of the project is to demonstrate the applicability of a systems approach to the design of erosion, sedimentation, and flood control works by applying this approach to 16 demonstration watersheds in the Yazoo Basin hill area. During FY 98, work continued in the DEC toward development of the systems plans and implementation of a monitoring program. Cumulative through FY 98, the District has completed the construction of 121 low drop grade control structures, 552,000 linear feet of bank stabilization, 115,000 linear feet of channel improvement, 18 box culverts, 6 high drop grade control structures, 702 riser pipe grade control structures, 2 floodwater retarding structures, and 51,000 feet of levees. (h) Tributaries. Construction: (1) Bank Stabilization. Three bank stabilization items located on the Tallahatchie and Yalobusha Rivers were awarded in FY 94. The work was completed in FY 95. (2) Channels. Construction of the Alligator-Catfish, Round Lake Water Control Structure was completed Nov. 28, 1989. Construction on the remaining channel work on the Ascalmore-Tippo Project is complete. Contract forces continued operation and maintenance of channels, levees, and drainage facilities. (3) Levees. Levee work associated with the last item of work on Ascalmore-Tippo Project is complete. Levee work associated with Item 1 and Item 1-A Pelucia Creek is complete. Three Pelucia Creek pumping stations are complete. Construction of Pelucia Creek, Item 2, Item 3, and Item 4 were completed in FY 94. Pelucia Creek relocations are scheduled for completion in FY 99. (i) Upper Yazoo Projects. The first ten items of channel improvement, approximately 67 miles, and nine drainage structures have been completed. This work extends from Yazoo City, Mississippi, to about 26 miles upstream of Belzoni, Mississippi. The Fort Pemberton Flood Control Structure was completed on Apr. 29, 1991. Roebuck Lake and Fort Loring water control structures and Tchula Lake weirs were completed in FY 95. Item 3A-2 levee was completed in FY 94. Channel Item 3A-1 was completed in FY 96. Item 3A-2 channel work was completed in FY 97. This item contains the first thin layer disposal site. Channel Item 3B-1 was awarded in Sep. 97 and is scheduled for completion in FY 99. Channel Item 3B-2 was awarded Apr 98 and is scheduled for completion in FY 99. Design efforts for Channel Item 5 is underway. Design efforts for Channel Item 4 are complete, and the first work on Item 4 is scheduled for Oct 99. The Alligator-Catfish water control structure was awarded in FY 95 and is scheduled for completion in FY 98. This structure has been renamed the J. Tol Thomas Water Control Structure. Mitigation for Upper Yazoo Projects. Mitigation for the terrestrial impacts is now underway. Approximately 7,400 acres of cleared, frequently flooded lands have been obtained in the Yazoo Backwater area of Mississippi to mitigate the wildlife losses resulting from construction of the Upper Yazoo Projects. This land has been reforested and will be managed for terrestrial wildlife. A total of 17,000 acres of mitigation will be required for this project. (j) Yazoo Basin backwater. The Yazoo area backwater levees are complete, including the backwater levee from the Mississippi River levee to the west levee of the lower Auxiliary Channel, the Little Sunflower River drainage structure, and the connecting channel from the Steele Bayou drainage structure to the Big Sunflower River. The Satartia area backwater levee is complete. Rocky Bayou area levee Items IA and lB have been completed. Completed backwater levees will require 41-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 raising to provide the degree of protection intended based on the project design flow line developed for the Mississippi River following the 1973 flood. Four Greentree Reservoirs and pumping stations have been constructed to mitigate for the waterfowl impacts of the project. Mitigation of the terrestrial impacts is now underway. Approximately 8,800 acres of cleared, frequently flooded, agricultural lands have been obtained in the Yazoo Backwater area of Mississippi to mitigate the wildlife losses resulting from construction and operation of the Yazoo Area and Satartia Area levees projects. This land has been reforested and will be managed for terrestrial wildlife. Condition as of Sep. 30. The first feature of Yazoo Basin project was started in 1936, and the total project is about 65 percent complete. Memphis District CACHE BASIN, AR Operations and results during fiscal year. No contracts were awarded or completed during the fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1972 and is 4 percent complete. Construction of the authorized project was stopped in 1978 due to environmental opposition. Reevaluation studies of the authorized plan were initiated in June 1987 to provide a more environmentally balanced plan. The reevaluation effort was terminated on Dec. 15, 1994, due to a lack of local sponsorship. The Memphis District has initiated action to turn the acquired mitigation lands (7,959 acres) over to the U.S. Department of Interior. CONSTRUCTION GENERAL EIGHT MILE CREEK, ARKANSAS Location. The project is located in the City of Paragould, AR. Existing Project. The existing project consist of 12.5 miles of channel improvements. Eight miles of channel enlargement will occur in the rural downstream area of Paragould. Three and a half miles of enlargement will occur in the City of Paragould along with one mile of channel riprap/stabilization. The project will provide 100 year flood protection within the City of Paragould. Local Cooperation. A project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was assigned in June 1996. Conditions as of Sep. 30. The contract for work on the rural eight miles of channel was awarded in October and work was initiated in December. The City of Paragould continues to work to provide PCA requirements (lands, relocation, etc.) for the work within the city. HELENA AND VICINITY, AR Location. The project is located in the City of Helena, AR. Existing Project. The existing project consists of 1.41 miles of earthen and concrete channel enlargement within the city limits of Helena, AR. The concrete channel will be constructed primarily under streets while the earthen channel is in an undeveloped section of the city. Local Cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was signed in August 1997. Conditions as of Sep. 30. The City of Helena is working to meet PCA (lands, relocations, etc.) requirement for advertisement of the first construction contract, the earthen channel. HELENA HARBOR, PHILLIPS COUNTY, AR Operations and results during fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project construction was initiated during 1989 and completed in December 1994. HORN LAKE CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES INCLUDING COW PEN CREEK, TENNESSEE AND MISSISSIPPI Location. Horn Lake Creek is located in northwest Desoto County, MS and southwest Shelby County, TN. Existing project. The project was approved for construction on Nov. 17, 1986, under authority of Title IV, Section 401 of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. The project consists of 3.5 miles of drift removal and 2.75 miles of channel clearing on Horn Lake Creek; 2.1 miles of channel clearing on 41-12 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION Rocky Creek and 0.62 miles of channel clearing and 1.85 miles of channel enlargement on Cow Pen Creek. The project will provide 1.1-year flood frequency protection on Horn Lake and Rocky Creeks and 25-year flood frequency protection on Cow Pen Creek. The estimated construction cost for the project is $5,600,000. The initial contract for project construction was awarded in Apr. 1993. Project completion occurred in 1998. Local Cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed with the Horn Lake Creek Watershed Drainage District on Feb. 26, 1992. The sponsor is required to provide the lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations required for project construction and a cash contribution. Total non-Federal cost share will be between 25 and 50 percent of total project cost. Condition as of Sep. 30. The contract for work on Cow Pen Creek was awarded in September 1997 and was completed in Sept. 1998. LOWER WHITE RIVER Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Augusta to Clarendon Levee. There were no contracts awarded or completed during the fiscal year. (b) Clarendon Levee. There were no contracts awarded or completed during the fiscal year. (c) Oldtown Culvert Phillips County. Contract awarded on Feb. 28, 1997 to replace culverts, is complete. (d) Wabash to Hudson's Landing. surface awarded on Jun. 18, 1998. Gravel (e) White River levee stabilization. Awarded on Sep. 25, 1998. (f) Des Arc Arkansas. Bank stabilization awarded on Sep. 17, 1998. (g) White River. Cutterhead hydraulic pipeline awarded on May 29, 1998. Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Augusta to Clarendon Levee. Project was initiated during 1946 and is 39 percent complete. There were no contracts awarded or completed this fiscal year. (b) Clarendon Levee. Gravel surfacing job was completed on Dec. 6, 1995. (c) Wabash to Hudson's Landing. surface, complete on Oct. 15, 1998. Gravel (d) White River Levee. Levee stabilization is 21 percent complete. (e) Des Arc Arkansas. Bank stabilization, 90 percent complete. (f) White River. Cutterhead hydraulic pipeline, completed on Oct. 15, 1998. NONCONNAH CREEK, MS AND TN Operations and results during fiscal year. No contracts awarded or completed during this fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project construction was initiated during 1990 and is 50 percent complete. MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES Operations and results during fiscal year. In addition minor maintenance on levees is performed as required by the local interests and major maintenance is performed as required for slide repairs, road rehabilitation, and other similar work by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Gammon, AR berm awarded Aug. 15, 1996, completed Oct. 30, 1998. Poker Point Levee Restoration, awarded Dec. 28, 1995, completed. Culvert Rehabilitation awarded Jun. 16, 1998 and 0 percent complete. MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES Seepage Stoval, Coahoma awarded Jul. 25, 1997, 90 percent complete. Caruthersville Floodwall Repairs awarded May 9, 1997, completed. Nash Relief Wells awarded Oct. 21, 1996, completed Sep. 19, 1997. Hatchie River channel awarded Oct. 10, 1996, completed Apr. 5, 1997. Dismal Point/Kangaroo Point stone dike awarded on Apr. 15, 1997, and was completed Feb. 14, 1998. Riprap Paving on the Ohio River awarded on Jun. 1, 1998, and was completed Sep. 30, 1998. Artictual Concrete Mattress awarded Mar. 30, 1998, and was complete Nov. 9, 1998. Stone Dike Construction 41-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 Mississippi River awarded Jun. 30, 1998, and was 62.7 percent complete. Montezuma Bar, stone dike construction on Mississippi River awarded Jul. 20, 1998, and was 0 percent complete. REELFOOT LAKE - LAKE NO. 9, TN AND KY Operations and results during fiscal year. No contracts awarded or completed during this fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1974 and is 95 percent complete. ST. FRANCIS BASIN, AR AND MO (a) Little River Drainage. Operations and results during fiscal year. Real estate activities are continuing. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1938 and is 95 percent complete. (b) Lower St. Francis River. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. Rivervale Levee Slope awarded Jun. 30, 1997, 38 percent complete. Graham Burke continued pump bearing rehabilitation. Below Hwy 90, Emergency Stone Placement awarded on Sep. 21, 1998. Big Lake scour repair and trash rack awarded on Jul. 31, 1998, and was 68.3 percent complete. WG Huxtable Pumping Plant, impeller replacement awarded on Jan. 30, 1998. Tulot Ditch County Bridges awarded on Jan. 29, 1998, and was completed Dec. 2, 1998. Channel Enlargement, Ditch 1 Item 4 awarded on May 29, 1998, and was 30.7 percent complete. Des Arc Arkansas Culvert Rehabilitation awarded on Aug. 25, 1998, and was 0 percent complete. (c) Upper St. Francis River. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. State Bridge, Main and Ditch 2, Item 2, Mile 17.70, awarded Mar. 21, 1996, 91 percent complete. Main and Ditch 2, Item 2, bridge, Mile 20.89, awarded Jun. 27, 1997, 67 percent complete. Main and Ditch 2, Item 2, bridges, Miles 19.85 and 17.12 awarded Nov. 21, 1996, complete. Main and Ditch 2, Item 1, Channel Enlargement, awarded Oct. 21, 1996, complete. Emergency stone placement, Dunkin, MO, awarded Sep. 15, 1998, 97.4 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project initiated 1937. project is 90 percent complete. ST. JOHNS BAYOU AND NEW MADRID FLOODWAY Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction of the first item of work (4.3 miles of vegetative clearing) was completed in Oct. 97. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction on remaining items can not be initiated until NEPA processing is completed. Remaining construction work on the First Phase include approximately 23.3 miles of channel improvements and two pumping stations. Work scheduled this summer after compliance with NEPA and receipt of rights-of-way from locals includes initiating a channel enlargement item and work on the New Madrid Pumping Station. WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES, KY Operations and results during fiscal year. No contract awarded or completed during fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1978 and is 4 percent complete. Project is currently inactive due to lack of local support; however, locals have formally requested assistance in developing an environmentally sensitive plan of improvement. A preliminary time and cost estimate for a general reevaluation have been prepared. WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES, TN Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Forked Deer River and principal tributaries, TN. Forked Deer River channel improvement is 14 percent complete. (b) Obion River and principal tributaries, TN. Obion Rivers channel improvement is 68 percent complete. (c) Riprap Protection at four sites Dyer, Crockett, Haywood, and Lauderdale awarded Aug. 29, 1996, 95 percent complete. Protection of Gas Pipelines on the South Fork Forked Deer River in Haywood County, awarded Oct. 30, 1997, is complete. Riprap protection at 3 sites Dyer, Crockett, and Lauderdale counties awarded on Aug. 10, 1998, and 41-14 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION was 53.2 percent complete. Shutdown plan control structures at 3 sites, Dyer and Lauderdale counties awarded on Aug. 3, 1998, and was 10 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. West Tennessee Tributaries Project is 60 percent complete. WHITEMAN'S CREEK, ARKANSAS Location. The project is located in the city of Jonesboro, AR. Existing project. The project was authorized for construction by the Water Resources Development Act of 1992, on Oct. 31, 1992. The project consists of 6.1 miles of channel improvements on Whiteman's, Turtle, Moore's and Higginbottom Creeks. The proposed improvements will provide 10-year level of flood protection along Whiteman's, Turtle and Moores and 25-year protection on Higginbottom. Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed May 31, 1996. Conditions as of Sep. 30. The contract to initiate work on Item 1, Higginbottom Creek and Moore's Ditch was awarded in August 1996 and completed in June 1997. The second and final contract for work on Whiteman's and Turtle Creek's was advertised in November and scheduled for completion in September. 41-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 41-A MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Head of Passes Locality Improvement Remarks 0-957' 10-81 11-25 118 81 44-91 81-96 91-104 96-279 104-234 127-129 129 129-234 235 279-287 287-303 303-314 314-572 Head of Passes, LA-Cairo, IL The Jump-New Orleans, LA Baptiste Collette-Bayou Ostrica, LA Davis Pond, LA (formerly Myrtle Grove, LA) Caemrnarvon, LA Bohemia, LA-New Orleans, LA New Orleans, LA New Orleans, LA New Orleans-Morganza, LA New Orleans-Baton Rouge, LA Bonnet Carre' Floodway, LA Mississippi-Louisiana Estuarine Areas, LA/MS (Bonnet Carre') Bonnet Carre'-Baton Rouge, LA Baton Rouge Harbor Morganza Floodway, LA Morganza-Old River, LA Old River, LA control Old River-Cypress Creek, AR Main line levee, left bank Devils Swamp barge channel Regulating spillway, right bank Main line levee, right bank Levee closure and enlargement, low and high water spillway structures, navigation lock, and approach channels, right bank Main line levee, right bank Dredging, revetment, and contract work Main line levee, right bank Local levees, left bank Salinity control structure, right bank Salinity control structure, left bank Main line levee and floodwall, left bank Main line levee, right bank Main line levee and floodwall, left bank Main line levee, right bank Main line levee, left bank Regulating spillway, left bank Salinity control structure, left bank 41-16 Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Postauthorization change report, approved June 1987. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. -- Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. -- Authorized by Public Public Law 100-676 Modified by Public Law 87-874. Extends up south bank of Old River to Barbre Landing. Authorized by Public Law 83-780. Joins Arkansas River, south bank levee. MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-A MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS (Continued) Mileage Above Head of Passes Locality Improvement Remarks 437 437-721 490 537 646 605-666 672-993 722-725 721-734 803-873 857 890 890 890-954 902-922 922 946 9571 Vicksburg Harbor, MS Vicksburg-Lake View, MS Wilson Point, LA Greenville Harbor, MS Long Lake, Helena, AR Henrico-Helena, AR St. Francis River-Commerce, MO3 Industrial levee (Ensley Bottoms) Memphis Harbor, TN Tiptonville-Obion River Near Mud Lake, TN St. Johns Bayou, MO New Madrid Floodway, MO New Madrid-Birds Point, MO Slough Bend, Hickman, KY Hickman, KY Peafield, MO Cairo, Cairo drainage district Harbor extension and industrial fill Main line levee, left bank Pumping Plant and drainage structure, right bank Harbor improvements and port area Culvert and floodgate, right bank Main line levee and floodwall, right bank Main line levee, right bank Levee and pumping station Closure of Tennessee Chute, industrial fill, levee, harbor channels, etc. Main line levee, left bank, levee extension, and diversion Obion River Pumping station and adjacent channel improvements Drainage floodgate and levee closure Drainage floodgate and levee closure Floodway, right bank Main line levee, left bank Floodwall, left bank Drainage floodgate Floodwalls and levees 41-17 Authorized by Public Law 70-391. Modified by Public Laws 79-526 and 83- 780. -- Unpublished Vicksburg District's MRC report approved Apr. 14, 1966.2 Authorized by Public Law 85-500. Authorized by Public Law 79-526.2 Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Modified by Acts of Jul. 24, 1946 and Dec. 23, 1971. Authorized Dec. 15 and 17, 1970 under Sec. 201 of Oct. 27, 1965 FC Act. Modified by Jul. 24, 1946 Act. Modified by Sep. 3, 1954 Act. -- Authorized by Sep. 3, 1954 Act. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 41-A MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS (Continued) Mileage Above Head of Passes Locality Improvement Remarks 957' Cairo, Cairo drainage Floodwalls, levees, and pumping -- district, Mounds, Mound plant City, and vicinity Thebes-Rock Island, IL Levees, both banks Intermittent (Sec. 6). Cape Girardeau, MO, to Rock Levees Intermittent (Sec. 6). Island, IL 1. Cairo, IL, is on Ohio River about 3 miles above its mouth (Mississippi River mile 954 AHP). 2. Also see Table 41-D, "Authorizing Legislation." 3. Commerce, MO, is on Upper Mississippi River, 39 miles above mouth of Ohio River. 41-18 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA1 Atchafalaya Basin, Morganza and West Atchafalaya Floodways West Atchafalaya Floodway between Red River and Alabama Bayou Morganza Floodway between Mississippi River and Alabama Bayou Atchafalaya Basin Floodway between Alabama Bayou and Morgan City East protection levee (Morganza and Atchafalaya Floodways) Lacour-Red Cross Morganza-Morgan City Bayou Latenache Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area Bayou Fordoche-Ramah Bayou Sorrel' Bayou Sorrel Lock-Morgan City Morgan City Below Morgan City Below Morgan City Atchafalaya Basin Floodway lower protection levee Calumet Below Morgan City Berwick' Patterson West protection levee (Atchafalaya Basin and West Atchafalaya Floodways) Simmesport-Hamburg Mansura to Wax Lake Outlet Floodway Floodway Floodway 0-54 27-54 54-117 20-27 25-117 27 0-27 31-57 80 53-117 117 117-129 117-129 105 105-120 115 116 5 5-105 Including lower Morganza Floodway guide levee. Through upper Morganza guide levee and enlargement of outlet channel. Enlargement of Bayou Latenache. Approved Jun. 4, 1970. See Table 41-D. Levee landside borrow pit. Alternate route, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Port Allen to Morgan City. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway utilizes levee west side borrow pit channel. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Bypass route for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. East of lower river. Bayou Teche-Wax Lake Outlet. Inclosed area between Wax Lake Lake Outlet and Berwick. Lower Atchafalaya River. Adjustment to provide fresh water. West Atchafalaya Floodway. 41-19 Levee, upper Morganza guide Levee and Morgan City floodwall Drainage structure, Pointe Coupee, and channel enlargement Additional drainage facilities Drainage channel Lock Alternate navigation channel. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Lock in Bayou Boeuf' Channel relocation Levee, floodwall Floodgate, east Levees, floodwall, drainage structures, and pumping plants Lock Water system Levee fuse plug Protection levee REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 41-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND (Continued) OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 29 29 40 40 40 41 41 41 94 94 105 Levee enlargement and floodgate extension Railway Railway Gated drainage structures Highway Highway Gated drainage control structures and channels Railway Railway Floodgate and approach channels Outlet, Charenton drainage canal and protection levee Floodgate, west Drainage canal-railway and highway bridges Through West Atchafalaya protection levee. -- -- -- -- Borrow pit channel to Grand Lake through West Atchafalaya protection levee. Restoration of drainage west of West Atchafalaya Basin protection levee. Bayou Teche and Wax Lake Outlet. To lower flood heights. Coulee des Grues West Atchafalaya Floodway Morganza Floodway Bayou Darbonne West Atchafalaya Floodway Morganza Floodway Bayou Courtableau West Atchafalaya Floodway Morganza Floodway Charenton Jaws-Lake Fausse Pointe Calumet Wax Lake Outlet Archafalaya River Barbre Landing-Alabama Bayou Simmesport Simmesport-Bayou Garofier Melville Krotz Springs Below Alabama Bayou Mississippi River-Morgan City TECHE-VERMILION BASINS, LA Atchafalaya River to Teche- Vermilion Basins Courtableau Basin, LA, and outlets Charenton Canal West Atchafalaya protection levee borrow pit channel Bayou Courtableau spillway Bayou des Glaises Levee, ring, and drainage structure West bank, levee Levee, ring Levee, ring Channel enlargement 12- by 125-foot navigation channel Pumping station above Krotz Springs, conveyance channels, and appurtenant works Drainage channel Drainage channel Drainage control structure Diversion channel Increase channel capacities to decrease flood heights. Through Grand and Six Mile Lakes. Freshwater distribution from Atchafalaya River to Teche- Vermilion Basins. Outlet to gulf Intercepting drainage channel. 41-20 East bank, levee 105 0-54 5-6 5-66 28-30 40-41 54-117 94-106 Mileage Above Mouth 0-8 50-133 96 133 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND (Continued) OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage above mouth Locality Improvement Remarks 0-17 17-40 40-51 51-60 17-42 87-107 40 60 87 Enlargement and additional culverts Enlargement and realinement New channel New channel New channel Enlargement, clearing, and snagging Enlargement, realinement, clearing, and snagging Fixed elevation weir Gated drainage structure Gated drainage structure Railway, highway, and local road bridges, and pipeline crossing BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES Bayou Courtableau Bayou Cocodrie Bayous Cocodrie-Boeuf diversion Bayou Boeuf Bayous Boeuf-Rapides diversion Upper Cocodrie Bayou Boeuf Bayou Lamourie to Kincaid Structures Lecompte Control Structure Bayou Rapides Control Structure Bayou Lamourie Control Structure Various LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LA Lake Pontchartrain, Jefferson Parish, LA AMITE RIVER, LA Amite River, LA LOWER RED RIVER, SOUTH BANK, RED RIVER LEVEES, LA Moncla-Hotwells Bayou Rapides Pumping plant and gravity structure Red River-Moncla to Lake Long EASTERN RAPIDES AND SOUTH-CENTRAL AVOYELLES PARISHES, LA Eastern Rapides and southcentral Avoyelles Parishes, LA Bank protection Levee, south bank Levee, south bank Levees Flood protection and drainage improvement Washington to west protection levee. (2.3) Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Eliminated by Public Law 89-298. -- Senate Doc. (Public Law 84-99) Added to project by Public Law 101-514. Intermittent (Sec. 6). Authorized by Public Law 91-611. 41-21 Flood protection 82-145 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 41-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND (Continued) OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage above mouth Locality Improvement Remarks 3-56 TENSAS BASIN, AR AND LA Red River backwater area Tensas-Cocodrie area Larto Lake-Jonesville Sicily Island area Below Red River area Black River, LA Six Mile Bayou area Jonesville, LA Ouachita River Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, AR and LA Boeuf River, AR and LA Below Bayou La Fourche Bayou La Fourche Boeuf River, AR and LA above Bayou La Fourche Canal 19 Canal 19 extension Big and Colewa Creeks Tributaries of Boeuf River-- Canal 19 Fleschmans Bayou Caney Bayou Big Bayou Canal 18 Kirsch Lake Canal Black Pond Slough Bayou Macon, AR and LA Bayou Macon Canal 43 Canal 81 Pumping plant and drainage structure Tributary of Bayou Macon Rush Bayou Tensas River, AR and LA Tensas River Tributary of Tensas River Levees, drainage channels, structures, and pumping plant Levees, drainage channels, and structures Levees, drainage channels, structures, and pumping plants Levees, drainage channels, structures, and pumping plants Drainage structure and appurtenant channel works Levees, floodwall, pumping plant, and interior drainage Levees, drainage channels, and structures Clearing Channel improvement and realinement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement To divert flows from Lake Chicot Clearing Channel improvement 41-22 (4) (4) (4) (4) Unpublished VXD-MRC Letter Report dated May 31, 1977, MR&T authority.2 Portion of levee built under Sec. 6. Incorporated in MR&T by Public Law 81-516.2 Monroe to Sandy Bayou and Bawcomville (Sec. 6). (5) (5) Authorized by Public Laws 78-534 and 79-526.23 (5) (6) Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 (6) (6) (5) (6) (6) (6) See Table 41-E (5) (5) Authorized by Public Law 90-483. (6) Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 3-56 56 0-32 0-56 151-235 210-286 286-296 0-75 0-8 0-7 0-33 0-10 0-9 0-14 0-170 0-34 0-35 Lake Chicot 0-6 0-165 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND (Continued) OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage above mouth Locality Improvement Remarks 0-22 0-0.2 23-98 35-98 48-102 0-75 0-381 75-366 75-345 45-109 75 127 185 381 0-64 Channel improvement Filling canal Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Levee, south bank Revetment Mill and Vidal Bayous Grant's Canal, LA Grant's Canal at Lake Providence LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, AR Yancopin-Pine Bluff Fletcher Bend, AR, to Pine Bluff North Little Rock to Gillett (below Plum Bayou) GRAND PRAIRIE-BAYOU METO, AR Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR YAZOO BASIN, MS Yazoo Backwater area Yazoo River System below Arkabutla Lake Yazoo River between Yazoo City and Prichard Yazoo River between Yazoo City and Askew Will M. Whittington Auxiliary Channel Yazoo City protection Rocky Bayou area Belzoni protection Greenwood protection Arkabutla Lake Yalobusha River below Grenada Lake Grenada Lake Tallahatchie River-Little Tallahatchie River Little Tallahatchie River below Sardis Lake Sardis Lake Yocono River below Enid Lake Enid Lake Cassidy Bayou below Old Coldwater River Upper Yazoo Projects (5) Authorized by Public Law 81-516. -- Including Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers. Intermittent. Intermittent. Floodway channel Levee, drainage structure, and pumping plant Channel clearing and enlargement Levee and floodwall Levees, channel improvement, drainage structures, and pumping plants Flood detention and conservation Channel improvement Improvement of 7.8 miles was approved Apr. 29, 1970. STeaebl e 41-C. -- See Table 41-C. Flood detention and conservation See Table 41-C. Levees, Panola-Quitman Floodway -- Channel improvement -- Flood detention and conservation See Table 41-C. Channel improvement -- Flood detention and conservation See Table 41-C. Channel improvement Including Moores Bayou, Cutoff Bayou, Whiting Lake and outlet. Floodway channel -- 41-23 Levee, north bank Aquifer protection. water supply and environmental improvements Levees and pumping plants Channel improvement Levees, right bank Levees, left bank 64 0-24 0-26 26 0-13 13 0-88 137-260 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 41-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND (Continued) OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage above mouth Locality Improvement Remarks 75-381 0-8.3 0-23 0-42 275-290 0-204 0-8 0-28 0-81 0-43 0-4 0-27 153-160 0-68 13-55 0-68 99 108-192 122 Area between main stem and hills including Bobo Bayou McKinney Bayou enlargement of pumping plant. Alligator-Catfish Bayous Bear Creek Whiteoak Bayou Tallahatchie River, MS Big Sunflower River, etc. Big Sunflower River Hull Brake-Mill Creek Canal Hushpuckena River Quiver River Gin and Muddy Bayous, MS Bogue Phalia Ditchlow Bayou Little Sunflower River Deer Creek Steele Bayou Muddy Bayou LOWER WHITE RIVER AND BASIN, AR Laconia Circle-Old Town Lake Big Creek and tributaries structures Clarendon levee Augusta to Clarendon De Valls Bluff Levees and channel improvement Channel improvement and Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Two road crossings of Panola- Quitman Floodway, MS, and for protection of Sheley Bridge Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Water-control structure Levee, backwater including outlet Pumping plant Channel improvement and Levee and outlet structures Levees, outlet structures Levee, outlet structure, and pumping station 41-24 Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. As modified in GDM in 1967. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 90-147. Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 -- Authorized by Public Law 87-874. Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Modified in December 1970. See Table 41-D. Approved Mar. 3, 1970. See Table 41-D. Mile 605-645 Mississippi River. (6) Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. (5) (5) MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND (Continued) OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage above mouth Locality Improvement Remarks Des Arc, AR 0-196 0-90 260 0-225 225 0-105 86 0-36 0-29 0-17 0-12 143 Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized Dec. 16, 1975. See Table 41-D. STeabel e 41-C. See Table 41-C. CACHE BASIN, AR Cache River, AR Bayou DeView, AR ST. FRANCIS RIVER AND BASIN, AR AND MO Inter-River Drainage District in Missouri Mouth of St. Francis River- Wappapello Dam Wappapello Lake Little River Basin Marked Tree, AR Tyronza River Big Slough Ditch Mayo Ditch Cross County Ditch Belle Fountain Ditch Drainage District No. 17 L'ANGUILLE RIVER, AR L'Anguille River and tributaries, Brushy and First Creeks WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES Wolf River and tributaries, TN Obion River and tributaries, North, South, Middle, and Rutherford Forks Forked Deer River and tributaries, North, Middle, and South Forks Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Harris Fork Creek, TN and KY 41-25 Levee, outlet structure, and pumping station Channel improvement and structures Channel improvement and structures Channel improvement and two outlet structures Floodway, levees, drainage channels, and structures Flood detention and conservation Floodway, levees, drainage channels, and structures Marked Tree Siphon Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement and pumping station Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Pumping plant Flood control improvements Authorized by Public Law 90-483. Authorized by Public Law 90-483. Authorized by Public Law 80-858. (6) Authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act. Authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act. Authorized by Resolutions Dec. 15 and 17, 1970.2 Authorized by Water Resources Act of Oct. 22, 1976.2 Section 102, 1976.2 0-108 0-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 41-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND (Continued) OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage above mouth Locality Improvement Remarks Porter Gap, TN REELFOOT LAKE-LAKE NO. 9, TN AND KY 0-20 Running Reelfoot Bayou, TN 0-15 Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9, KY and TN WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES, KY 0-47 Obion Creek, KY Construction to main-stem standards, levee and appurtenant structures for flood control Channel improvement Channel improvements and pumping station Channel improvement Section 183, 1976.2 Authorized by Public Law 83-780. Authorized in December 1970. See Table 41-D. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. LITTLE RIVER DIVERSION CHANNEL, MO Delta to Ancell, MO MISSOURI RIVER, MO Mouth to St. Charles, MO ILLINOIS RIVER, IL Mouth to Havana, IL OHIO RIVER, IL AND KY Cairo to Mound City and Mounds, IL Levees Levees Levees Mile 49 above Cairo. Intermittent (Sec. 6). Intermittent (Sec. 6). Floodwall, levee, revetment, and pumping plant 1. General data concerning Bayou Boeuf, Bayou Sorrel, and Berwick locks where Atchafalaya Basin protection levees cross Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, alternate route to Plaquemine, LA, and lower Atchafalaya River (extension of Bayou Tech Waterway), respectively, are in report of New Orleans District. 2. Also see Table 41-D, "Authorizing Legislation." 3. Public Law 81-516 modified requirements of local cooperation. 4. Authorized by Public Law 77-228. Modified by Public Law 89-298. 5. Authorized or incorporated in MR&T by Public Law 79-526. 3 See Table 41-D. 6. Authorized by Public Law 85-500. 41-26 0-28 0-120 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-C MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY DAMS AND LAKES Grenada Enid Sardis Arkabutla Wappapello Name' Lake Lake Lake Lake Lake River Yalobusha Yocona Little Tallahatchie Coldwater St. Francis Nearest town to damsite Grenada Enid Sardis Arkabutla Wappapello Drainage area, square miles 1,320 560 1,545 1,000 1,310 Conservation pool: Area, thousand acres 10 6 11 5 4 Volume, thousand acre-feet 86 58 108 31 31 Elevation, feet, NGVD 193.0 230.0 236.0 209.3 354.7 Flood control pool: Area, thousand acres 65 28 58.5 33 23 Volume, thousand acre-feet 1.252 602 1,462 494 582 Runoff, inches 17.8 20.2 17.7 9.3 8.4 Outlet gates: Number 3 2 4 3 3 Size, feet 7.5 by 14 8 by 16 6 by 12 8.5 by 19 10 by 20 Capacity, thousand cubic feet per second 10.7 9.4 10.0 10.0 18.0 Spillway: Type, uncontrolled Chute Chute Chute Chute Gravity Length, feet 200 200 400 300 740 Elevation, crest, feet, NGVD 231.0 268.0 281.4 238.3 394.7 Discharge capacity, thousand cubic feet per second 52 50 132 89 229 Surcharge pool: Area, thousand acres 106 41 90 63 32 Volume, thousand acre-feet 1,385 554 1,447 858 521 Runoff, inches 19.7 18.5 17.6 16.1 7.5 Elevation, feet, NGVD 247.5 284.0 301.0 256.3 413.7 Dam: Type, earthfill Rolled Rolled Hydraulic Rolled Rolled Length, thousand feet 13.9 8.4 15.3 11.5 2.7 Elevation, crest, feet, NGVD 256.0 293.0 311.4 264.3 419.7 1. Grenada, Enid, Sardis, and Arkabutla Lakes are in Yazoo River Basin, MS; Wappapello Lake is in St. Francis River Basin, MO. 41-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document May 15, 1928 Jun. 19, 1930 Feb. 15, 1933 Apr. 23, 1934 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 15, 1936 Flood protection in alluvial valley of Mississippi River, revetment and contraction works and dredging to provide least channel depth of 9 feet and width of 300 feet below Cairo. Provided for allotment of the balance of emergency rescue funds to reimburse levee districts and others for expenditures in floodcontrol works during the 1927 and subsequent floods. Provided for ownership of lands in Bonnet Carre' Spillway and Floodway with proviso for granting rights-of-way, easements, and permits, in said lands. Authorized payment for purchase of, or to reimburse states and local levee districts for the cost of, levee rights-of-way for floodcontrol work in the Mississippi Valley, and for other purposes. Improvement of Wolf and Nonconnah Rivers, TN (Nonconnah Creek is correct title). Improvement of Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), TN. Modification of the 1928 Act to provide for: Construction of a backwater levee at mouth of White River, AR. Construction of Eudora floodway in lieu of Boeuf floodway; flood control, Yazoo River: construction of Morganza floodway; and an outlet to the Gulf of Mexico west of Berwick, LA, including a 6-year program for the improvement and regularization of the Mississippi River between Arkansas and Red Rivers, and Atchafalaya River; and construction of roads on levees and drainage adjustments incident to floodway levees. Provided for construction of floodwalls, levees, and revetments along Wolf River and Nonconnah Creek for protection of Memphis, TN. Modify the Yazoo River project to substitute a combined reservoir floodway and levee plan. Construction of Mounds to Mound City levee and control works along Cache River, IL. Modification of previous act pertaining to floodways and outlets and lands therein; including program for the improvement and regularization of the Mississippi River, between Cairo and Arkansas River, extension of levee road system; strengthening of levees. Enlarge main line levees to offset abandonment of floodways between Arkansas and Red Rivers, flood-control works in backwater areas of Yazoo and Red Rivers, and in Bayous Rapides, Beouf, and Cocodrie, LA. Unpublished report on record in OCE. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 359, 77th Cong., 1st sess. 41-28 H. Doc. 90, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 395, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 351, 72d Cong. Public Law 171, 73d Cong. R&H Comm. Doc. 26, 72d Cong., 1st sess. R&H Comm. Doc. 45, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Unpublished report dated Apr. 2, 1925. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Aug. 28, 1937 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Dec. 22, 1944 Jul. 24, 1946 Jun. 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Navigation channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide between Baton Rouge and Cairo; flood protection of Yazoo River Backwater Area in vicinity of Satartia, MS. Continue prosecution of channel improvement and stabilization program, $200 million. Flood control on the Big Sunflower, Little Sunflower, Hushpuckena, and Quiver Rivers and their tributaries, and on Hull Brake-Mill Creek Canal, Bogue Phalia, Ditchlow Bayou, Deer Creek, and Steele Bayou, MS.' Improve Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, AR.' Improve Bayou Lafourche, LA. Improve Yazoo River tributaries. North bank, Arkansas River levees(below Plum Bayou).' Levees on White River (Augusta to Clarendon).' Bayou des Glaises diversion channel, LA.' Modify local cooperation requirements in St. Francis and Yazoo Basins. Tiptonville-Obion levee and drainage improvements.' Improvement of St. Johns Bayou, MO. Big Sunflower River, etc.' Tennessee Chute (Memphis Harbor), TN. Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $100 million. Improve Mississippi River below Cape Girardeau, MO, with respect to West Tennessee tributaries. Improve L'Anguille River, AR. Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp), LA.' Flood protection at Des Arc, AR. Improve St. Francis River and Basin, AR and MO. Improve Cache River and Bayou DeView, AR and MO. Improve Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR. 41-29 H. Doc. 509, 78th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 534, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 516, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 151, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 191, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 516, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 526, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 757, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 138, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 516,78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 51, 80th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 526, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 627, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 651, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 321, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 485, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc., 132, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 88, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 255, 81st Cong., 1st sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Flood protection, Lake Pontchartrain, Jefferson Parish, LA.' Filling Grant's Canal, Lake Providence, LA. Additional protection to Red River Backwater Area. Extend Federal jurisdiction to cover levees in Orleans Parish, LA. Bank protection, Amite River, LA. Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $200 million. Jonesville, LA, levee, retaining wall, and drainage structure.' Oct. 30, 1951 Modify requirements for local cooperation in White River Backwater Area, AR. Sep. 3, 1954 Navigation improvement of Atchafalaya from Mississippi River to Morgan City, LA. Modify project for Vicksburg-Yazoo Area (Harbor), MS. Improve New Madrid Floodway, MO, including Peafield drainage floodgate. Control of Old and Atchafalaya Rivers and a lock for navigation. Improve Reelfoot Lake area, KY and TN. Jul. 3, 1958 Improve Greenville Harbor, MS. Extensions to project for Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon in Arkansas. White River backwater area pumping plant. Wolf River and tributaries for flood protection in Tennessee. Jul. 14, 1960 Continue prosecution of project for channel improvement-- $50 million. Oct. 23, 1962 Modification--Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp), LA. Construct improvements in Gin and Muddy Bayous, Yazoo River Basin, MS. Replace 2 bridges with adequate floodway over Boeuf River and Big Bayou in Boeuf Basin, AR. Jun. 18, 1965 Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $53 million. S. Doc. 139, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 237, 82d Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 53, 82d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 85, 83d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 183, 83d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 478, 83d Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 160, 83d Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 15, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 108, 85th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 26, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 76, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 86-645. Public Law 87-874. Public Law 87-874 Public Law 87-874. Public Law 89-42. 41-30 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Modify and expand levees and channel improvement features of main stem project. Modify flood control improvements in following tributary areas and basins: Cairo-Mounds-Mounds City, St. Francis, Lower White, Boeuf-Tensas-Macon, Red River backwater, Yazoo headwater, Grand Prairie, and Bayou Meto. Acquire any modified easements required in New Madrid Floodway as provided by Sec. 4 of May 15, 1928 act. Operate and maintain pumping plant in Red River backwater area (Tensas-Cocodrie Pumping Plant). Provide improvements in West Kentucky tributaries. Provide fish and wildlife facilities in St. Francis and Big Sunflower Basins; Yazoo Headwater and Backwater Areas; and Mississippi Delta region. Deauthorize Amite River, LA, project. Modify St. Francis River, MO and AR, project within District No. 7, Poinsett County, AR. Provide pumping plant and drainage structure at Wilson Point, LA. Nov. 7, 1966 Construction of improvements to supplement freshwater supply in Teche-Vermilion Basins in Louisiana. Bank revetment for protection of existing industrial facilities along Mississippi River below Baton Rouge, LA. Modification of West Tennessee tributaries feature to provide relocation of gas transmission lines at Federal expense. Nov. 20, 1967 Aug. 13, 1968 Sep. 10, 19683 Mar. 3, 19703 Continue emergency work, $87,135,000, which includes $100,000 for road crossing of Panola-Quitman Floodway, MS, and $80,000 for protection of Sheley Bridge, Tallahatchie River, MS. Improvements in Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon Basin to divert flows that would otherwise enter Lake Chicot, AR. Improvements in the Belle Fountain ditch and tributaries, MO, and Drainage District No. 17, AR. Provide pumping plants and other drainage facilities in Cairo, IL, and vicinity. Modification of Yazoo Headwater Project to include cleanout along David Bayou, MS. Modify Yazoo Backwater feature to include a control structure in Muddy Bayou, MS. Oct. 27, 1965 41-31 H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc., 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 57, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Unpublished Vicksburg District's MRC report. Approved Apr. 14, 1966. H. Doc. 524, 89th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 89-789. Public Law 89-789. Public Law 90-147. H. Doc. 168, 90th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 339, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 90-483. Unpublished MRC report dated May 8, 1968. Unpublished MRC report dated Feb. 2, 1970. Apr. 14, 19662 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Modification of Yazoo Headwater Project to include drainage structure and channel improvement on Rocky Bayou, MS. Jun. 4, 19703 Provide for enlargement of Bayou Latenache from Pointe Coupee drainage structure to Alabama Bayou, LA. Dec. 31, 1970 Modify and expand project to include flood protection within the area of eastern Rapides and south-central Avoyelles Parishes, LA, that are drained by Bayou des Glaises diversion channel and Lake Long, and their tributaries. Modify the project for West Kentucky tributaries (Obion Creek), KY, to provide for all relocations, at Federal expense, of all transmission lines required by the project. Senate and Report on Western Tennessee Tributaries, TN and KY, House Public authorized: Works a. Modification of Reelfoot Lake feature to provide channel Resolutions improvements on Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9 in KY and adopted Dec. 17 TN. and 15, 1970, b. Modification of Mississippi levee feature to include a respectively.4 pumping station near Mud Lake floodgate and adjacent channel improvements. Modification of Big Sunflower Basin feature to provide additional improvements in Steele Bayou Basin, MS. River Basin Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive Monetary Act development of the basin, $97 million. of Dec. 23, 1971 Modification of Tiptonville-Obion River levee feature to relieve local interests of all responsibility except that of providing maintenance. Jan. 19, 19732 Modification of the Mississippi levee feature to provide additional drainage facilities in Long Lake area, vicinity of Helena, AR. TITLE I Water Projects recommended by four completed reports were Resources authorized for accomplishment of Phase I design memorandum Development of advance engineering and design on: Act of 1974. a. Greenville Harbor, Greenville, MS. b. East bank of Mississippi River, Warren to Wilkinson Counties, MS (Natchez area). c. East bank of Mississippi River, Warren to Wilkinson Counties, MS (Vicksburg-Yazoo area). d. Bushley Bayou Area of Red River Backwater Area, LA. Modification of West Tennessee tributaries feature (Obion and Forked Deer Rivers), TN, to acquire lands for fish and wildlife, recreation, and environmental purposes. Apr. 29, 19703 41-32 Unpublished MRC report dated Mar. 6, 1970. Unpublished MRC report dated Sep. 22, 1969. S. Doc. 91-113, 2d sess. Public Law 91-611. H. Doc. 91-414, 2d sess. S. Doc. 91-74, 2d sess. Sec. 1, Public Law 92-222. Sec. 7, Public Law 92-222. Unpublished Memphis District's MRC report dated Oct. 4, 1972. Sec. 1, Public Law 93-251, Mar. 7, 1974. S. Doc. 93-38, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-148, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-148, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-157, 1st sess. Sec. 3, Public Law 93-251. MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document TITLE II River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974 River Basin Monetary Act of Oct. 2, 1975 Dec. 16, 19752 TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act, 1976. Modification of the Yazoo Basin, MS, feature to provide for a streambank erosion control demonstration project for the delta and hill areas of basin. Modification of project to provide that the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, can substitute authorized mitigation lands, not yet acquired and no longer suitable, for like acreage in the same or adjacent subbasins of the project area. This section provides the authority to substitute authorized mitigation lands in: a. Tensas Basin, LA and AR, feature (Red River backwater). b. St. Francis Basin, AR and MO, feature. Modification of Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, LA, feature, to provide for: enlargement of Bayou Courtableau from Washington to west protection levee; right-of-way and spoil disposal areas at Federal expense; and necessary additional culverts through west protection levee. Modification of Cache River Basin, AR, feature to provide for: acquisition by fee easements of lands for fish and wildlife management, recreation, and environmental purposes. Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $211 million. Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $158,000,000. Modification of St. Francis Basin, AR and MO, feature to provide relief from ponding of interior runoff in the Inter-River Drainage District of Missouri. Continue prosecution of project for comprehensive development during period Jul. 1-Sep. 30, 1976, $60,300,000. Sec. 32, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 42, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 87, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 99, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 201, Public Law 93-251. Mar. 7, 1974. Sec. 1, Public Law 94-101. Unpublished Memphis District's MRC report dated Nov. 11, 1975. Public Law 94-180, Dec. 26, 1975. 41-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act, 1977. Water Resources Development Act of 1976. TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act, 1978. Dec. 9, 1977, 5th Ind. on VXD May 31, 1977, Letter Report. 2 Jun. 28, 1980 Continue prosecution of project for flood control, rescue work, repair, restoration, and control of bank erosion, $231,497,000. Sec. 101(a) authorized accomplishment of Phase I - Advanced Engineering and Design Memoranda-On: a. St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, MO, project: Report of OCE - Sep. 26,1975. b. Nonconnah Creek, TN and MS, project: Report of OCE - Jun. 23, 1976, and as an independent part of the project: Improvements for flood control and allied purposes on Horn Lake Creek and tributaries, including Cowpen Creek, TN and MS. Modification of West Tennessee Tributaries feature (Obion and Forked Deer Rivers), TN, to: a. (Sec. 102) - Provide project for flood control for Harris Fork Creek, TN and KY: (H.D. 94-221) except that highway bridge relocations and alterations shall be at Federal expense. b. (Sec. 183) - Provide for construction of a levee and appurtenant works from mouth of Obion diversion channel to vicinity Highway 88 and thence to vicinity of Porter Gap, TN. Continue prosecution of project for flood control, rescue work, repair, restoration, and control of bank erosion, $253,081,000. Modification of the Tensas Basin Project, Red River Backwater Area, to include a drainage structure and appurtenant channel works in the Six Mile Bayou area of Concordia Parish, LA. The establishment of the Tensas River National Wildlife Refuge for the preservation and development of environmental resources and in lieu of mitigation acquisitions which otherwise would be required for certain water resources projects, within designated limits, in the basins of the Tensas, Boeuf, and Red Rivers in the State of Louisiana. Public Law 94-355, Jul. 12, 1976. Public Law 94-587, Oct. 22, 1976. Public Law 95-96 Aug. 7, 1977. Unpublished Vicksburg District report dated May 31, 1977, on Cynthia and Six Mile Bayous, LA. Public Law 96-285, Jun. 28, 1980. 41-34 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act. 1981 Supplemental Appropriations Bill for FY Ending Sep. 30, 1985 (PL 99-88), and the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) Water Resources Development Act, 1986 For expenses necessary for prosecuting work of flood control projects, rescue work, repair, restoration or maintenance of flood control projects threatened or destroyed by flood, $232,519,000: Provided, That not less than $250,000 be available for control of bank erosion of streams in the Yazoo Basin, including the foothill area. Provided further, That funds for the Tensas Basin Red River Backwater Area, be used for flood control, etc., for Sicily Island and Below Red River including pumping stations. Authorizes and directs the Secretary of the Army acting through the Chief of Engineers to proceed with planning, design, engineering, and construction of 41 water resources projects, including Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System. For the Atchafalaya Basin Floodway Systems project, cost-sharing is only required for the recreation feature of the project. The flood control and environmental features are Federal costs. Sec. 104(a), Authorization of Projects - Authorization of Construction: Incorporation of the project for flood control, Louisiana State Penitentiary levee, Mississippi River, LA: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated Dec. 10, 1982, at a total cost of $23,400,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $17,600,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $5,800,000. No acquisition of land for or actual construction of the project may commence until appropriate non-Federal interests shall agree to undertake measures to minimize the loss of fish and wildlife habitat lands in the project area. The work is unscheduled. a. Bushley Bayou, LA. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the project for flood control, Bushley Bayou, LA. b. Eight Mile Creek, Paragould, AR. Project entails channel improvement along the creek with miniparks and hiking/ biking trails. c. Helena and Vicinity, AR. The Helena Basin is an urban basin containing approximately 3,500 acres which frequently and severely floods the city of Helena. A pumping station and sump with channel enlargement and a gated culvert was recommended. d. West Memphis and Vicinity, AR. Channel improvements along Ten Mile Bayou and Fifteen Mile Bayou for a total of 23.86 miles, with limited revegetation of right-of-way to maintain environmental stability. e. St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, MO. Flood control for urban and rural land. Public Law 96-367, Oct. 1, 1980. FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Bill (PL 99-88), and Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662). Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986. 41-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document f. Nonconnah Creek and Johns Creek, TN and MS. Channel enlargement, recreation features with channel construction and environmental enhancement. g. Horn Lake Creek and Tributaries, TN and MS. This is an urban flood control project located in extreme northwest Mississippi and southwest Tennessee. The plan of improvement consists of 3.5 miles of selective drift removal on lower Horn Lake Creek and 2.6 miles of vegetative clearing on Horn Lake Creek, 2.1 miles on Rocky Creek and 0.6 miles of vegetative clearing and 1.8 miles of channel enlargement on Cow Pen Creek. Hike/bike trails are included along Rocky Creek and Cow Pen Creek. h. Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, La. Not mentioned, but this Act authorized basic cost sharing principles for the project. In particular establishes that the fish and wildlife enhancement feature of the project is of national significance, and therefore, a 100 percent Federal cost. i. Lower Atchafalaya Basin Reevaluation Study. Authority to, within available funds, investiage conditions at Wax Lake Outlet, Bayou Black, and other features, and recommend any modification desirable for flood protection navigation, and environmental program. Sec. 601(a) Authorization of Projects. Authorization of Construction: a. Yazoo Backwater Area, MS. Authorized the project for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses at the Yazoo Backwater Project, MS. The project shall include acquisition of 40,000 acres for mitigation of project-induced fish and wildlife losses. b. Greenville Harbor, MS. Authorized the project for navigation, Greenville Harbor, MS, as contained in the reports of Chief of Engineers, Nov. 15, 1977 and Feb. 2, 1982, at a total cost of $43,700,000 with an estimated first Federal cost of $28,000,000 and an estimated non- Federal first cost of $15,700,000. c. Vicksburg Harbor, MS. Authorized the project for navigation, Vicksburg Harbor, as contained in the report of the Chief of Engineers, Aug. 13, 1979, at a total estimated first Federal cost of $55,900,000 and an estimated non- Federal first cost of $23,300,000. d. Helena Harbor, Phillips County, AR. The recommended plan consists of dredging a navigation channel to provide access to 685 acres of landfill; construction of an overlook park; implementing landscaping and erosion control measures; and mitigation fish and wildlife losses. The project is scheduled to be constructed in two phases. 41-36 Energy and water Development Appropriation Act, 1994 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document e. White River Navigation to Batesville, AR. The plan of improvement recommended in the Feasibility Report provides for construction and maintenance to provide a 200-foot wide, 9-foot deep channel available 95 percent of the time from mile 10 (Arkansas Post Canal) to mile 254, two scenic overlooks, a primitive camping area, and acquisition of about 1,865 acres of woodlands for mitigation. However, section 52 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 deauthorized this project. f. Obion Creek, KY. To prevent headwater flooding along tributary streams and backwater flooding of alluvial lands. g. Memphis Harbor, Memphis, TN. This is a navigation project in the vicinity of Memphis, TN, which would consist of dredging and maintaining a 4.9 mile long, 500-foot minimum width, 9-foot deep general navigation channel with additional dredging as required and strategic placement of dredged material to create and provide navigation access to 1,000 acres to be developed as a waterfront industrial complex. Sec. 806. Reelfoot Lake, KY. This project is modified to provide that the Federal share of the cost of operating the pumping plant feature of such project shall be 50 percent. Sec. 836. Mud Lake, Western Tennessee Tributaries. This project is modified to provide that the requirements of local cooperation shall be (1) 50 percent of the value of the lands, easements, and rights-of-way, (2) to hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works, and (3) to maintain and operate all the works after completion. Jun. 4, 1987 Modification of Mississippi Delta Region project to construct salinity control structure at Davis Pond (mile 118) rather than at Myrtle Grove (mile 59). Water Resources Development Act, 1988 Water Resources Development Act, 1988 Sec. 3(a), Project Authorizations - Authorization of Construction: a. Mississippi-Louisiana Estuarine Area, MS and LA. Authorized the project for environmental enhancement, as contained in the report of Chief of Engineers, dated May 19, 1986, at a total cost of $59,300,000. Section 4(b) West Memphis and Vicinity, AR. Modified the project by allowing that non-Federal cooperation may be provided by levee districts, drainage districts, or any unit of a state, county, or local government. Unpublished New Orleans District report, Nov. 1, 1984. Public Law 100-676 Nov. 17, 1988 Public Law 100-676, Nov. 17, 1988 41-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Energy and Water Development Appropriation Bill, 1990 Energy and Water Development Appropriation Bill, 1990 Supplemental Appropriations Bill for FY Ending Sep. 30, 1985 (PL 99-83), and the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) Water Resources Development Act, 1992 Water Resources Development Acts, 1986 and 1990 West Memphis and Vicinity, AR. Directed the Corps to develop the most cost-effective flood control plan for the City of West Memphis without regard to frequency of flooding, drainage area, and the amount of runoff. Bayou Rapides Drainage Structure and Pumping Plant Directed the Secretary of the Army to incorporate existing flood control features for the Bayou Rapides Drainage Structure and Pumping Plant into the Lower Red River, South Bank Levees portion of the MR&T Project. Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, LA. Authorizes and directs the Secretary of the Army acting through the Chief of Engineers to proceed with planning, design, engineering, and construction of 41 water resources projects, including Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System. For the Atchafalaya Basin Floodway Systems project, cost-sharing is only required for the recreation feature of the project. The flood control and environmental features are Federal costs. This act authorized basic cost sharing principles for the project. In particular, establishes that the fish and wildlife enhancement feature of this project is of national significance and therefore a 100% federal cost. Whiteman's Creek, Arkansas. Directed the Secretary of the Army to implement flood control improvement, which essentially consist of 6.1 miles of channel enlargement along streams within the city limits of Jonesboro, Arkansas. Louisiana State Penitentiary Levee, Mississippi River, Louisiana Public Law 101-83, Jul. 25, 1989 Public Law 101-514, Nov. 5, 1990 FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Bill (PL 99-88), and Water Resoureces Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662). Public Law 102-580 Oct. 31, 1992 Public Law 99-662 Nov. 17, 1986 Authorizes and directs the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers to proceed with planning, design, engineering, and construction of improvements of 12 miles of existing levee along the Mississippi River which provides flood protection to the Louisiana State Penitentiary at Angola, LA. This act authorizes basic cost sharing principles, and establishes that the cost sharing will be shared on a 75%/25% basis with the state of Louisiana for this project. Public Law 101-646 Nov. 28, 1990 1. Incorporated into Mississippi River and tributaries project as shown in Table 41-E. 2. Date minor modification for blocked drainage was approved under delegated authority of the President, Mississippi River Commission, and in accordance with Sec. 10(p) of the 1946 Flood Control Act (Public Law 79-526). 3. Date minor modification was approved under discretionary authority of Chief of Engineers contained in May 15, 1928, Flood Control Act, as amended. 4. Projects approved under the provisions of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of Oct. 27, 1965. 41-38 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-E INCORPORATING AND AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION For Last Public Full Report Act of Law Authorizing See Annual Incorporation No. Act Description Report for Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Jun. 22, 1936 Tiptonville-Obion levee and drainage 1941, p. 943 improvements, TN Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Jun. 22, 1936 Bayou des Glaises diversion ditch, LA 1946, p. 1029 Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Jun. 22, 1936 From North Little Rock, AR, to Gillett, 1946, p. 1053 AR, on north bank of Arkansas River (portion below Plum Bayou) Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Aug. 18, 1941 White River levees, Augusta to 1946, p. 1083 Clarendon and De Valls Bluff, AR Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Dec. 22, 1944 Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou 1945, p. 982 Macon, LA Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Dec. 22, 1944 Big Sunflower River, etc. 1946, p. 1061 Jun. 30, 1948 80-858 Jul. 24, 1946 Devils Swamp barge channel at Baton 1948, p. 1059 Rouge, LA (Baton Rouge Harbor) May 17, 1950 81-516 Jun. 22, 1936 Jonesville, LA 1953, p. 773 May 17, 1950 81-516 Jul. 24, 1946 Lake Pontchartrain-Jefferson Parish, LA 1953, p. 737 41-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 41-F SUMMARY OF PRESENTLY ESTIMATED FEDERAL FIRST COST OF AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS Estimated Cost' Project Title Fiscal Year 1998 Completed features2 Mississippi River levees Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Sec. 6 levees, 1928 Flood Control Act Channel improvement Atchafalaya Basin, LA Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, LA Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, LA Old River, LA Lower Red River--South Bank Red River levees, LA Eastern Rapides and South-Central Avoyelles Parishes, LA Mississippi Delta Region, LA Tensas Basin, AR and LA Lower Arkansas River, AR Grand Prairie-Bayou Meto, AR (Flood Control & Water Supply) Yazoo Basin, MS Lower White River, AR (All except Big Creek & Tribs.) Lower White River (Big Creek & Tribs.) Cache Basin, AR St. Francis Basin, AR and MO Eight Mile Creek, AR L'Anguille Basin, AR West Tennessee Tributaries, TN Harris Fork Creek, TN and KY Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, TN and KY Reelfoot Lake, TN and KY (Completed) Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, TN and KY West Kentucky Tributaries, KY Sardis Dam (Dam Safety Assurance), MS St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, MO Nonconnah Creek, TN and MS Horn Lake Creek and Tributaries, TN and MS Greenville Harbor, MS Memphis Harbor (Ensley Berm), TN Helena Harbor, Phillips County, AR Helena, AR, and Vicinity West Memphis, AR, and Vicinity Vicksburg Harbor, MS Louisiana State Penitentiary Levee, LA Hickman Bluff, KY Whiteman's Creek, AR $ 339,236,000 1,995,000,000 5,270,0003 4,000,0003 3,667,000,000 1,720,000,000 185,000,000 20,400,0003 292,273,000 23,200,0003 50,000,0003 99,200,000 475,336,000 29,676,0003 245,350,0003 1,740,246,000 16,802,0003 55,400,0003 155,000,000 387,000,000 9,000,0003 13,300,0003 143,000,000 14,300,0003 (19,440,000) 3 440,000 19,000,000 24,800,0003 29,200,000 58,000,0004 18,400,0004 3,120,0004 32,400,0003,4 23,100,0004 32,156,0004 8,370,0003,4 11,600,0004,6 63,500,0004 19,500,00047 19,810,000 3 3,300,000 41-40 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-F SUMMARY OF PRESENTLY ESTIMATED (Continued) FEDERAL FIRST COST OF AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS Estimated Cost' Project Title Fiscal Year 1998 Mississippi and Louisiana Estuarine Areas, LA and MS 66,900,0005 Eastern Arkansas, AR 114,0003 Jackson and Trenton, AR 9,650,0003 Mississippi Delta, MS 61,600,0003 Bushley Bayou, LA 37,000,000 Bayou Meto, AR 192,000,000 Miss R Alexander County, IL, Scott City, MO 3,250,000 Clarendon Levee, AR 1,576,000 Augusta to Carendon, AR 4,601,000 Memphis Metro, TN 26,000,000 Wolf River, TN 11,765,000 TOTAL $12,466,141,000 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Inflation projected through the construction period. Harbors; Lake Pontchartrain; Wolf River; completed roads. Includes Bonnet Carre', Morganza, and New Madrid Floodways; Memphis, Greenville, and Vicksburg on main stem levees; channel construction works; Atchafalaya River and Basin; Wax Lake Outlet; Charenton Canal; Bayou des Glaises diversion channel, Boeuf Basin levees; Grant's Canal; De Valls Bluff, Jonesville, and Des Arc protection works; Baton Rouge Harbor; and miscellaneous features; Teche-Vermilion Basins, LA. Incremental (not projected through the construction period). Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1988, Public Law 100-676, Nov. 18, 1988. Locals built their own project. Price Level as of 1988. 41-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 41-G MISSISSIPPI RIVER MAIN STEM CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS Location Operations in 1,000 Cubic Yards Mileage Fiscal Year 1998 Above Head Channel District of Passes Construction Maintenance Total New Orleans Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp) 235 -- 40.5 40.5 Main stem channel 234-320 -- 1,153.2 1,153.2 (Smithland and Wilkinson Pt Crossings) Atchafalaya Basin 2550.0 2550.0 Berwick Bay Harbor 68.1 68.1 Three Rivers Old River Lock Forebay 304 190.7 190.7 and Tailbay Vicksburg Main stem channel 322-600 -- 414.8 414.8 Vicksburg Harbor 437 -- 106.8 106.8 Greenville Harbor 537 -- 97.7 97.7 Memphis Main stem channel 600-954 -- 9,678 9,678 Memphis Harbor, McKellar Lake 725 -- 0 0 TOTAL -- 14,299.8 14,299.8 41-42 TABLE 41-H BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES, AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard Revetment: Venice, LA .............. 12 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 49,552 Olga, LA ................ . 19 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 13,885 Lower Childress- Fort Jackson, LA ......... . 22 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 15,430 Neptune, LA ............ 23 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,399 Buras, LA .............. 25 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 17,283 Tropical Bend, LA ........ 30 R -- -- -- 1,131 8,313 -- -- 25,012 Bayou Lamoque, LA ....... 33 L -- -- -- 741 3,824 -- -- 21,505 Port Sulphur, LA ......... . 39 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 36,995 Nestor, LA .............. 41 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 12,420 Point Michel, LA ......... . 44 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 22,932 Bohemia, LA .............. 46 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 15,441 Diamond, LA ............ 49 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,600 Gravolet, LA ............ 51 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 23,874 2 Junior, LA .............. 54 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 23,599 Harlem, LA ............. . 56 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 15,148 Myrtle Grove, LA ........ 59 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 17,435 Monsecour, LA .......... 61 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 13,340 Alliance, LA ............ 62 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 17,265 Belair, LA .............. 65 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 26,111 Jesuit Bend, LA .......... 68 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 24,978 Linwood, LA ............ 71 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,643 Oak Point, LA ........... . 72 R 1,049 222 6,487 -- -- -- -- 16,426 Scarsdale, LA ........... . 75 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 17,825 English Turn, LA ........ 78 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 21,845 Poydras, LA ............. . 82 L -- -- -- 1,017 6,083 -- -- 45,864 Twelve Mile Point, LA ..... 84 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 9,979 Cutoff, LA .............. 88 R -- -- -- -- -- 8,234 -- 23,234 d d . d "r ti d y y TABLE 41-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES, AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Standard Revetment: Third district reach, LA ....... Algiers Point, LA ........... Gouldsboro Bend, LA ........ Gretna Bend, LA ............ Greenville Bend, LA ......... Carrollton Bend, LA ......... Avondale Bend, LA .......... Kenner, LA ................ Luling, LA ................. Destrehan, LA .............. Good Hope, LA ............ Waterford, LA .............. Montz, LA ................ Lucy, LA ................ Reserve, LA ............... Willow Bend, LA ........... Angelina, LA .............. Vacherie, LA .............. Belmont, LA ............... Rich Bend, LA ............. Romeville, LA ............. St. Alice, LA .............. Burnside, LA .............. Aben, LA ................. St. Elmo, LA .............. Smoke Bend, LA ............ Marchand, LA .............. Philadelphia Point, LA ........ New River Bend, LA ......... White Castle, LA ........... 93 95 96 97 100 104 109 114 119 102 126 128 132 136 138 141 145 148 152 157 161 165 170 172 174 177 180 183 185 193 2,084 -- L R R R R L R L R L L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R 1,554 11,021 4,473 10,886 11,585 -- 9,279 -- 27,167 -- 12,238 -- 4,960 -- 9,662 -- 22,045 -- 16,262 -- 28,409 -- 45,492 -- 44,893 -- 5,409 -- 24,531 -- 21,264 -- 17,502 -- 19,450 -- 23,234 -- 13,227 -- 34,192 -- 26,025 -- 25,575 -- 38,498 -- 33,986 -- 31,130 -- 29,304 -- 11,700 -- 12,014 -- 18,792 -- 19,603 -- 5,379 -- 45,672 -- 45,968 0 0 0 0 y 0 0 TABLE 41-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES, AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares) Feet) Feet) Standard Revetment: St. Gabriel, LA ............. Plaquemine Bend, LA ........ Manchac, LA .............. Missouri Bend, LA .......... Arlington, LA .............. Port Allen, LA ............. Scotlandville, LA ........... Allendale, LA .............. Springfield Bend, LA ......... Arboth, LA ................ Faulkner Lake, LA .......... Grand Bay, LA ............. Bayou Sara, LA ............ Red Store, LA .............. Arrow Bend, LA ............ Boies Point, LA ............ Morganza, LA .............. Iowa Point, LA ............. Brunette Point, LA .......... Greenwood Bend, LA ........ Hog Point, LA ............. Carr Point, LA ............. Above Old River, LA ........ Fort Adams, MS ............ Point Breeze, LA ............ Coochie, LA ............... 201 209 215 222 227 231 234 238 244 250 253 258 265 269 272 275 279 282 285 289 296 304 305 308 313 317 L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R R L R L R R R L R R 13,325 .-- 3,884 -- 250 -- -- 15,651 -- 7,231 --. -- 33,292 -- 45,094 -- 38,976 -- 30,437 -- 18,050 -- 17,627 -- 1,623 -- 28,698 -- 25,690 -- 20,190 -- 18,807 -- 24,909 -- 29,722 -- 18,464 -- 13,600 -- 16,094 -- 20,513 -- 15,477 -- 14,335 -- 26,032 -- 33,539 -- 20,725 -- 9,958 -- 24,206 -- 13,565 -- 17,150 i TABLE 41-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares) Feet) Feet) Palmetto, MS .............. 322 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 34,650 Total Revetment New Orleans District, Mississippi River ... Dikes: Profit Island Chute Closure, LA ............... Hog Point, LA .............. Hog Point Chute Closure ....... Total Dikes New Orleans District, Mississippi River ........ OLD RIVER CONTROL Standard Revetment: Inflow channel ............. Inflow channel ............. Outflow channel ............ Auxiliary inflow channel ...... Auxiliary outflow channel ..... Total Standard Revetment, Old River ............... 252 299 300 315 315 315 312 312 L L R L R L&R L&R L&R 4,933 472 22,138 6,527 38,520 55,734 -- 1,891,514 (0.93 Miles) (358.24 Miles) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,315 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,850 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 900 -- 12,065 (2.29 Miles) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,415 - -- -- -- -- - 4,365 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 19,891 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 17,200 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,790 49,661 (9.41 Miles) o O 0 O 0 0 a c TABLE 41-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Below Construction erative tive Confluence New Work Since Thru of Red and Bank Exten- Prior This Atchafalaya R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Rivers or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares) Feet) Feet) ATCHAFALAYA RIVER Standard Revetment: Mile One, LA ............... Coville Bayou, LA .......... Legonier, LA .............. Simmesport, LA ............ Kuhlman Bayou, LA ......... Odenburg, LA .............. Jacoby, LA ................ Cason, LA ................ McCrea, LA ............... Woodside, LA .............. Provosty, LA .............. Crooked Bayou, LA .......... Mercier, LA ............... Barberton, LA .............. Evans Point, LA ............ Goudeau, LA .............. Morris Bayou, LA ........... Goodwood, LA ............. Red Cross, LA ............. Melville LA .............. Cross Bayou, LA ............ Melville South, LA .......... Toles, LA ................. Petite Prairie, LA ........... Three Mile Bayou, LA ........ 1 3 4 6 7 9 10 12 13 14 17 18 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 30 31 33 35 36 37 L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R R 5,930 -- 4,150 -- 6,550 -- 8,940 -- 12,491 -- 5,565 -- 5,375 -- 7,390 -- 10,798 -- 6,572 -- 13,002 -- 9,111 -- 16,246 -- 10,478 -- 3,592 -- 6,6682 -- 3,938 -- 5,440 -- 8,505 -- 8,065 -- 5,660 -- 6,0652 -- 13,340 -- 6,355 -- 8,381 -- 6,330 0 z hM 1 ,< m3 0ar TABLE 41-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Below Construction erative tive Confluence New Work Since Thru of Red and Bank Exten- Prior This Atchafalaya R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Rivers or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Standard Revetment: Holloway Lake, LA .......... Bayou Sherman, LA ......... Krotz Springs, LA ........... Sherburne, LA .............. Bayou Big Graw, LA ......... Coswell Bayou, LA .......... Alabama Bayou, LA ......... Happy Town, LA ........... Otis Landing, LA ........... Morgan City, LA ............ Total Standard Revetment Atchafalaya River Dikes: Ten Mile Dikes LOWER RED RIVER -P 00 37 38 40 43 46 48 50 53 54 115 L R R R L L L R L -- 20,588 -- 20,588 10 R Below Confluence of Old River Outflow Channel and Red River (Miles) Standard Revetment: Long Lake, LA ............. Naples, LA ................ Tumrnbull Island, LA .......... Total Standard Revetment 3,925 5,355 3,925 (0.74 Miles) -- 7,085 -- 5,200 -- 7,925 -- 10,960 -- 8,394 -- 6,490 -- 9,410 -- 7,285 -- 5,251 -- 3,410 -- 270,417 (51.22 Miles) -- 2,500 (.47 Miles) O 0 O0 O O z 0 ra Oo 11,285 10 7 R R 9 L 4,375 4,375 -- 6,652 -- 6,190 -- 11,038 -- 23,880 (4.52 Miles) I TABLE 41-H BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: (Continued) NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Tons of (Linear (Tons of Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) Stone) Feet) Stone) (Tons of Stone) Feet) Feet) Dikes: None MISSISSIPPI RIVER .4 Foreshore Protection: Port Allen .................. 228.3 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,500 Cottage Plantation ........... . 222.6 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,000 Upper Plaquemine Point ....... . 210.5 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,350 Lower Plaquemine Point ...... 207.0 L -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 Point Pleasant .............. 201.7 R 5,221 -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,221 Upper Point Clair ........... 196.0 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 Point Clair ................ 191.0 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10,251 Belle Grove ............... 189.9 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 Donaldsonville ............. 174.2 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 Point Houmas .............. 168.9 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,400 Sunshine .................. 167.4 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 900 Union........... .......... 166.3 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,500 Convent .......... ........ 158.3 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,900 Oak Alley ................. . 153.4 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,800 Lutcher ................... . 148.6 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,910 Wallace ................ . 145.5 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10,390 Garyville ................. 140.4 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 Edgard ................... 138.2 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,700 Reserve .................. 136.0 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,200 Waterford ................. . 129.0 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 500 26 Mile Point .............. 122.8 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,320 Destrehan ................. 121.0 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 St. Rose .................. 120.8 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 9,830 Lower St. Rose ............. .116.6 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,050 Ama .................... 115.0 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 .4 nn n4 n ti ti -, .4 C b4 y4 y4 y4 y4 yV TABLE 41-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES, AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Tons of (Linear (Tons of Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) Stone) Feet) Stone) (Tons of Stone) Feet) Feet) Foreshore Protection: American Cyanamid ......... Willswood ................ Avondale ................. Twelve Mile Point ........... Avondale ................. Nine Mile Point ............ Greenville ................. Snowdrift ................. Gretna-Gouldsboro ........... Algiers ................... Holy Cross ............... Arabi .................... Quarantine ................ Huntlee .................. Chalmette ................. Norman .................. Brou .................... Auora.................... Blythe Blvd ............... Upper Stanton .............. Saxonholm-Docville .......... Pecan Grove-Story ........... Story-Allo ................ Delacroix ................. Twelve Mile Point ........... M errit ................... Saxonholm-Docville .......... Naval Depot ............... Caemrnarvon ................ 114.8 113.2 109.4 108.9 105.5 105.0 100.0 97.6 96.7 95.4 92.2 91.9 91.5 90.4 90.2 90.0 89.5 89.3 88.6 86.5 86.0 85.8 84.5 84.2 83.5 83.0 82.5 82.5 81.2 R R R L R R R R R R L L R R L R L R R R L L L R R L L R L -- 4,788 -- 2,430 -- 6,500 -- 4,580 -- 2,070 -- 1,760 -- 6,900 -- 8,450 -- 1,683 -- 1,548 -- 1,915 -- 6,130 -- 3,805 -- 3,139 -- 1,260 -- 2,968 -- 3,030 -- 3,700 -- 4,345 -- 12,890 -- 1,060 -- 1,910 -- 5,400 -- 8,220 -- 1,300 -- 7,800 -- 7,700 -- 3,096 -- 13,200 1,166 --_ --16 O 0 0 0 0 0 C TABLE 41-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES, AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Tons of (Linear (Tons of Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) Stone) Feet) Stone) (Tons of Stone) Feet) Feet) Foreshore Protection: English Turn ............... Little Rock ................ St. C laire ................. Fort St. Leon .............. Scarsdale ................. Belle Chase ............... Stella-Delcour .............. Oak Point .................. Promised Land-Woodlawn ..... Augusta-Live Oak ........... Jesuit Bend ................ Fanny-Belair ............... Sara-Star ................. Star ..................... Bayhi ..................... Burbridge ................. St. Rosalie ................ Beau-Carlisle .............. Alliance .................. Monsecour-Poverty Point ...... Irontown.................. Myrtle Grove-Woodpark ....... Harlem ................... Wood Park-Deer Range ....... Nero .................... Deer Range................ Upper Point-A-La-Hache ...... Junior.................... Point Celeste ............... 79.3 78.8 78.8 78.2 75.5 75.5 73.6 73.3 70.5 70.5 69.2 66.8 66.3 65.8 64.0 63.2 62.4 62.3 62.0 60.3 60.0 58.8 57.0 56.0 54.7 54.1 53.5 53.5 52.2 L R L R L R L R L R R L R R R L R L R L R R L R L R L R R -- 7,500 -- 9,268 -- 1,025 -- 10,700 -- 16,611 -- 11,500 -- 6,405 -- 13,766 -- 15,495 -- 13,135 -- 16,454 -- 12,400 -- 2,100 -- 5,470 -- 11,190 -- 12,335 -- 6,976 -- 6,258 -- 4,300 -- 7,380 -- 2,298 -- 8,450 -- 15,550 -- 17,650 -- 4,450 -- 4,220 -- 9,101 -- 7,811 -- 3,300 I TABLE 41-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES, AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Tons of (Linear (Tons of Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) Stone) Feet) Stone) (Tons of Stone) Feet) Feet) Foreshore Protection: Davant .................... St. Thomas ................. Woodland ................ Point-A-La-Hache ........... Nolan.................... Socola ................... Point M ichel ............... Happy Jack................ Port Sulphur ............... Little Texas ............... Home Place ............... Nairn ..................... Sixty Mile Point ............ Tropical Bend .............. Bowers................... Empire .................... Anderson ................. Fredrick ................. Buras ..................... Lower Buras ............... Triumph ................... Fort Jackson ............... Grand Prairie .............. Upper Commander ........... Commander ............... 51.5 50.0 50.0 48.1 47.2 46.5 44.2 43.0 39.7 39.0 37.6 34.5 32.1 31.2 30.8 29.7 29.2 27.5 26.0 24.0 22.5 21.9 19.2 18.2 18.0 L L R L R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R L R R -- 10,795 -- 6,430 -- 14,800 -- 23,030 -- 13,400 -- 8,255 -- 7,350 -- 18,785 -- 6,430 -- 300 -- 13,250 -- 5,915 -- 0 -- 5,775 -- 3,836 -- 2,865 -- 6,100 -- 3,820 -- 13,495 -- 8,900 -- 5,220 -- 16,690 -- 1,350 -- 3,180 -- 22,232 O y O 0 0 0 O y< C-- TABLE 41-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES, AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Tons of (Linear (Tons of Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) Stone) Feet) Stone) (Tons of Stone) Feet) Feet) Foreshore Protection: Boothville-Commander........ 16.0 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,824 Upper Venice .............. 12.0 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,800 Total Foreshore Protection New Orleans District Mississippi River ........ 6,387 -- -- -- -- -- -- 745,224 (1.21 Miles) (141.14 Miles) 4A 1. Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). 0 MCI M,#3 V1 M = TABLE 41-I BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares) Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard Revetment: Bougere Bend, LA ........... Dead Mans Bend, MS ........ Glasscock Cutoff, MS-LA ..... Railroad Landing, MS ........ St. Catherine Bend, LA ....... Morville, LA ............... Natchez Island, MS .......... Carthage, MS .............. Vidalia Casting Field ......... Natchez Front, MS .......... Giles Cutoff, LA-MS ......... Gibson, LA ................ Ashland, LA-MS ............ Kempe Bend, LA ........... Browns Field, LA ........... Goldbottom, MS ............ Hardscrabble, LA ........... Grand Gulf, MS ............ Point Pleasant, MS-LA ........ Togo Island, LA ............ Lake Kamrnac, LA-MS ......... Diamond Point, LA-MS ....... Oakbend, MS .............. Reid-Bedford, LA ........... Racetrack, MS .............. Barge Line Terminal, MS ...... Vicksburg Harbor, MS ........ Delta Point, LA ............. 610 -- -- -- _-- _-- -- .-- 329 335 342 346 350 356 357 361 363 364 366 371 374 383 389 392 398 403 413 415 419 423 425 429 433 437 437 437 2,422 -- _-- -- _-- -- 24,593 -- -- _ -- -- --. -- _ -- -- _ -- 10,409 1,590 _-- _-- 385 -- -- -7,041 -- 26,055 -- 33,220 -- 26,083 -- 14,740 -- 29,108 -- 16,917 -- 2,180 -- 14,700 -- 2,670 -- 6,510 -- 12,020 -- 26,000 -- 33,427 -- 28,285 -- 9,280 -- 30,250 -- 22,530 -- 56,118 -- 32,345 -- 7,080 -- 19,260 -- 17,315 -- 4,290 -- 18,392 -- 13,935 -- 3,040 -- 7,350 -- 7,650 O 0 O 0 i O y z 0r O y C 0 TABLE 41-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Standard Revetment: King's Point--Opposite Delta Point, LA-MS ........ False Point, LA ............. Marshall-Brown's Point, LA-MS ................. Milliken Bend, LA .......... Belle Island, LA-MS ......... Goodrich, LA .............. Cottonwood Bar, MS ......... Filter-Cottonwood, MS ........ Hagaman, LA .............. Ben Lomond, MS ........... Baleshed Towhead-Stack Island, LA-MS ............ Lake Providence, LA ......... Mayersville, MS ............ Sarah Island-Opossum Point, LA-MS ............. Carolina, MS .............. Cracraft, AR ............... Worthington, MS-AR ......... Walnut Point Kentucky Bend, MS................ American Cutoff, MS-AR ...... Sunnyside-Lakeport, AR ....... Vancluse, AR .............. Island 84, AR-MS ........... Warfield Point, MS .......... Leland-LaGrange, AR-MS ..... 439 443 446 453 460 467 470 474 481 486 488 489 497 501 507 511 514 519 526 530 534 535 537 538 L R L R L R R L R L R R L 19,330 12,860 3,060 R -- L -- R -- R -- L -- L -- R -- R -- 60 8,703 -- 4,315 -- 19,580 -- 46,140 -- 24,160 -- 40,765 -- 18,580 -- 41,732 -- 37,756 -- 10,235 -- 53,214 -- 11,600 -- 34,992 -- 26,815 -- 11,080 -- 22,210 -- 8,350 -- 45,653 -- 2,980 -- 33,685 -- 13,016 -- 13,475 -- 4,320 -- 14,150 11,160 C C/ TABLE 41-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 19987) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Standard Revetment: Spanish Moss, AR ........... Tarpley Island, MS .......... Miller Bend, MS ............ Island 82, AR .............. Ashbrook Island, MS ......... Arkansas City-Yellow Bend, AR ................ Huntington Point, MS ........ Pair O'Dice, AR ............ Eutaw-Mounds, MS .......... Cypress Bend, AR ........... Catfish Point, MS ........... Ozark, AR-MS ............. Prentiss, AR-MS ............ Rosedale Bend, AR .......... Riverton, MS .............. Klondike, AR .............. Victoria Bend-Terrene, MS ..... Lake Concordia, MS ......... Big Island, AR ............. Smith Point, MS ............ Dennis, M S ............... Cessions, M S .............. Total Revetment, Vicksburg District, Mississippi River ......... 539 542 544 546 549 553 556 561 563 568 573 578 582 585 586 588 593 596 598 601 611 615 R R L R R R L R L R L R L L L R L L R L L L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,580 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,000 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 29,360 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,080 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,455 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 44,335 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 21,205 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 9,095 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 40,188 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 34,405 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 20,075 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 22,015 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 20,315 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,820 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 12,500 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 23,400 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 29,245 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,980 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 16,515 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 18,185 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 25,195 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10,910 4,650 (.88 Miles) 445 15,744 4,925 13,582 35,002 -- 1,489,286 (282.06 Miles) O 0 O0 z 0 O y O 0 x ye y TABLE 41-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares) Feet) Feet) Dikes: Jackson Point, MS ........... Buck Island, MS ............ Opposite Wamrnicott Ldg., MS ................... Natchez Island, LA-MS ....... Opposite Rifle Point, MS ...... Rifle Point, LA ............. Waterproof Bar, LA .......... Spithead Towhead, MS ....... Browns Field, LA ........... Cottage Bend, LA-MS ........ Bondurant Towhead, LA ...... Coffee Point, LA ............ Yucatan, MS .............. Togo Island, LA ........... Newtown Bend, LA .......... Diamond Cutoff, MS ......... Below Racetrack, MS ........ Racetrack Towhead, MS ....... False Point, LA ............ Marshall Cutoff, LA ......... Below Grand Gulf, MS ....... Fritz Island, LA ............. Forest Home Towhead, LA ..... Willow Cutoff, LA .......... Tennessee Bar, MS .......... Arcadia Point, MS ........... Cottonwood Bar, MS ......... Point Lookout, LA ........... (2) 330 339 352 358 369 369 379 386 388 389 394 405 410 416 420 423 430 431 441 448 399 338 449 462 465 470 471 478 L R L R R L R L R R R L R L L R R R L R L R L L R R 640 --_ (3) _-- 4,620 -- 4,306 -- 6,334 -- 10,791 -- 14,608 -- 3,214 -- 4,197 -- 14,580 -- 9,681 -- 11,557 -- 14,049 -- 6,029 -- 11,925 -- 9,010 -- 8,256 -- 6,739 -- 6,711 -- 19,378 -- 15,270 -- 5,675 -- 5,166 -- 3,575 -- 4,160 -- 15,873 -- 4,275 -- 4,580 -- 9,463 -- 2,406 -- 2,751 C/1 C 0 C1 z TABLE 41-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Dikes: Ajax Bar, MS .............. Ben Lomond, MS ........... Baleshed Ldg., MS .......... Wilson Point, LA ........... Corregidor, MS ............. Carolina, AR ............... Cracraft Lower, AR .......... Cracraft, AR ............... Leota, MS ................ Island 86, AR .............. Seven Oaks, AR ............ Walnut Point, MS ........... Anconia Chute, AR .......... Refuge, MS ............... Island 84, AR .............. Warfield Point, AR .......... Leland Bar, AR-MS .......... Leland Neck, AR-MS ........ Tarpley Cutoff, MS-AR ....... Island 82-Miller Bend, AR-MS ................. Ashbrook-Miller Bend, AR-MS ................. Ashbrook Cutoff, MS ......... Chicot Ldg., AR ............ Catfish Point, MS ........... Below Prentiss, MS .......... Above Ozark, AR-MS ........ Malone Field, AR ........... (2) 482 488 493 500 505 509 510 513 514 520 523 525 527 528 532 535 538 540 540 L L L R L L R R L R R L R L L L R L R (3) 544 R&L 547 549 564 571 580 580 585 L&R L R L L R R 00 O 0O y 0 0 2 00 y O N x< 7d 28,152 24,667 15,721 8,423 6,730 2,897 10,329 3,809 7,571 18,477 5,829 4,725 7,159 19,695 12,475 2,020 15,086 4,315 10,478 13,646 13,015 8,728 22,381 5,290 12,413 5,545 7,549 TABLE 41-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Dikes Terrene, MS ............... White River Landing, AR ...... Montgomery Towhead, AR ..... Victoria Bend, AR ........... Smith Point, MS ............ Island 70, MS .............. Total Dikes, Vicksburg District, Mississippi River ......... (2) 590 591 592 596 600 608 (3) L -- R -- R -- R -- L -- L -- 640 (0.12 Miles) -- 7,921 -- 2,201 -- 6,071 -- 6,736 -- 7,617 -- 26,355 -- 4,620 -- 600,697 (113.77 Miles) Miles Above Mouth ARKANSAS RIVER4 Standard revetment: Menard Bend, AR ........... Como, AR ................ Morgan Bend, AR ........... Yancopin, AR .............. Total Standard Revetment, Arkansas River ........... Dikes: Hopedale Cutoff, AR ......... Morgan Bend, AR ........... 31 34 36 24 L R L R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,770 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,720 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,250 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,800 (2) 30 R 36 L -- 31,540 (5.97 Miles) -- 1,848 -- 3,658 (3) C/1 MGM O TABLE 41-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Above Construction erative tive Confluence New Work Since Thru with Bank Exten- Prior This Miss. R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY River or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)' (Squares) Feet) Feet) Dikes: Fletcher Bend, AR ........... Total Dikes, Arkansas River .................. RED RIVER5 Standard Revetment: Dupre, LA ................ Bringol, LA ............... Egg Bend, LA .............. Colonel Bend, LA ........... Roxana, LA ............... Ryland, LA ................ Whittington, LA ............ Smith, LA ................ Latanier, LA ............... Hudson, LA ............... Robert, LA ................ Alexandria Front, LA ......... Callahan, LA .............. Cotton, LA ................ Rapides, LA ............... Boyce, LA ................ Total Standard Revetment, Red River .............. (2) 39 R (3) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,187 7,693 (1.46 Miles) 69 73 75 77 83 88 89 91 93 99 102 105 110 116 119 125 R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,690 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,000 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,400 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 650 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,325 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,925 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,900 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,700 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,460 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,458 -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,500 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,280 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,000 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,700 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,030 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,548 -- 61,566 (11.66 Miles) O y r-3 O y 0 0 I=Q== O TABLE 41-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Above Construction erative tive Confluence New Work Since Thru with Bank Exten- Prior This Miss. R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY River or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Dikes6 : (2) (3) Choctaw Bayou Bend, LA ..... 71 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,000 Bringol (Egg Bend), LA ...... 73 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,477 Egg Bend, LA .............. 75 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 900 Cologne Bend, LA ........... . 77 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,850 Echo, LA ................. 78 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,900 Richardson, LA ............. . 79 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,700 Alexandria, LA ............. 105 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Bertrand, LA ............... . 122 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,630 Total Dikes, Red River ...... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 19,727 (3.74 Miles) 1. Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). 2. Linear feet of dike which were raised. 3. Linear feet of dike on which repairs were made. 4. See report on Arkansas River and tributaries, AR and OK, under Little Rock District. 5. Mileages based on 1967 hydrographic survey. 6. Includes all types of dikes and retards. 0 0 Mz TABLE 41-J BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares) Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard Revetment: Big Island, AR ............. Scrubgrass Bend, AR ......... Henrico, AR ............... Cessions Towhead, AR ....... Island 67, MS .............. Island 68 Bar-- Knowlton, AR ............ Ludlow, AR .............. Rescue Land, AR-MS ........ Fair Landing, AR ........... Burke Landing, MS .......... Island 62, AR .............. Island 63, MS .............. Island 63 Bar, MS ........... Oldtown Bend, AR .......... Horseshoe, MS ............. W estover, AR .............. Delta-Friars Point, MS ........ Helena, AR ................ Helena Towhead, AR ......... Trotters Landing, MS ......... Flower Lake, MS ........... St. Francis, AR ............. Harbert Point, MS ........... Walnut Bend, AR ........... Mhoon Bend, MS ........... Peters, AR ................ Commerce, MS ............. 598 600 606 615 621 622 626 629 632 637 638 639 639 644 647 650 665 660 664 665 667 672 675 680 685 692 695 R R R L L R R L R L R L L R L R L R R L L R L R 3,905 7,315 33,310 11,465 9,630 10,266 -- -- -- -- -- --_ -- -- 7,855 -- -- 26,710 -- 10,390 -- 27,020 -- 27,5152 -- 19,070 -- 9,030 -- 11,514 -- 3,795 -- 26,860 -- 16,385 -- 15,640 -- 30,090 -- 36,460 -- 3,690 -- 38,6852 -- 16,385 -- 24,663 -- 9,065 -- 31,070 -- 35,828 -- 33,760 -- 29,085 O y 0 0 x nI 0 TABLE 41-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)1 Feet) Feet) Standard Revetment: Porter Lake, AR ............ Pickett, MS-AR ............. Seyppel, AR ............... Norfolk-Star, MS ............ Cow Island Bend, AR ........ Cow Island Bend (Upper), TN .............. Coahoma, TN .............. Ensley, TN ................ Dismal Point, AR ........... Bauxippi-Wyanoke, AR ....... Presidents Island, TN ......... Hopefield Point, AR-TN ....... Loosahatchie-Memphis, TN .................... Loosahatchie Bar, TN ........ St. Clair, AR ............... Island 40, TN-AR ........... Brandywine, AR-TN ......... Shelby Forest, TN ........... Dean Island, AR ............ Cedar Point-Densford, TN .................... Chute of Island 35, TN ....... Richardson Ldg, TN ......... Lookout Bar, TN ............ Lookout, TN ............... Sunrise Towhead, TN ........ Driver Bar, TN ............. 700 703 709 711 714 716 717 723 724 730 733 736 737 740 742 744 750 753 756 759 764 769 772 774 776 780 23,954 --_ 4,350 --. --_ L R R R R L -- R -- L 725 R -- R -- R -- L 4,850 3,276 -19,812 19,812 15,776 -- -- 34,155 12,575 4,830 35,582 22,274 8,623 9,270 46,256 7,200 24,530 12,755 10,360 3,952 -- .-- -- 31,293 -- 2,070 -- 2,930 -- 30,750 -- 18,010 -- 9,5452 -- 7,555 -- 20,190 -- 30,930 -- 725 -- 2,990 -- 5,005 -- 18,4402 -- 4,850 < MI 0 4 C/ ICI C/ TABLE 41-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Standard Revetment: Lower Bullerton, AR ......... Kate Aubrey Towhead- Island 30, TN ............. Osceola, AR ............... Osceola, AR ............... Ashport-Keyes Point, TN ...... Kate Aubrey, TN ............ Island 26, TN .............. Bend of Island 25, TN ........ Barfield, AR ............... Obion-Tamm, TN ........... Huffman-Hickman, AR-TN ................. Heloise, TN ............... Island 18, MO .............. Linwood Bend, TN .......... Blaker Towhead, TN ......... Bells Point, MO ............ Gayoso-Caruthersville, MO ..................... Island 15, TN .............. Hathaway Landing, TN ....... Robinson Bayou, MO ........ Fritz Landing, TN ........... Lee Towhead, MO ........... Bend of Island 14, TN ........ Above Lee Towhead, TN ...... Little Cypress, MO .......... 782 R 786 786 786 791 793 798 803 808 819 826 831 836 841 845 845 848 851 852 852 857 859 859 861 864 R R R L R R L R L R L R L L R R L L R L L L L R 28,350 30,808 1,3503 5,823 44,232 2,500 15,690 32,3852 52,335 53,831 29,764 15,770 30,490 14,850 18,562 5,420 -10,290 -- 25,600 -- 3,630 -- 1,000 -- 22,630 -- 15,670 -- 9,640 -- 15,8302 -- 4,943 -- 40,140 O 0 O 0 0 0 7d 4 O 4 a O O 7d O TABLE 41-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Standard Revetment: Merriwether-Cherokee, TN .................... Linda, MO ................ Below Toney's Towhead, TN .................... Toney's Towhead, KY-TN ................. Kentucky Point, KY ......... New Madrid Bar, KY ........ New Madrid Bend, MO ....... La Forge, MO .............. Slough Landing Neck, TN-KY ................. Winchester Towhead, MO .................... Island 9, KY-TN ............ Milton Bell, MO ............ Chute of Island 8, KY ........ Bend of Island 8, MO ........ Island 8, KY ............... Hickman-Reelfoot, KY ........ Beckwith Bend, MO ......... Williams, KY .............. Wolf Island, KY ............ Columbus, KY ............. Belmont, MO .............. Island 3 and 4, KY .......... Campbell, KY .............. Pritchard, MO .............. 869 L 876 R 879 L 882 887 888 889 892 L L R R R 899 L 900 905 908 913 914 914 919 924 927 934 937 938 940 943 948 R L R L R R L R L R L R R L R 41,058 20,000 20,895 -- 13,640 -- 7,960 -- 16,825 -- 43,262 -- 24,930 37,520 5,540 33,585 16,600 12,620 39,945 18,515 46,399 18,203 10,015 22,495 7,395 5,785 19,970 6,865 15,045 i 4 3-' C/1 CA I 1 ICI 1 1 C 7C a C/1 C/1 1 1 z TABLE 41-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Standard Revetment: Mayfield Creek, KY ......... Wickliffe, KY .............. Cache-Cairo, IL (Ohio River) .............. Total Revetment, Memphis District, Mississippi River ......... Dikes: Henrico, AR ............... Below Knowlton, AR ......... Island 67, MS .............. Below Ludlow, AR .......... Sunflower, AR ............. Island 64, AR .............. Rescue Landing, MS ......... Island 62, AR .............. Island 63 Bar, MS ........... Island 63, MS .............. Kangaroo Point, AR ......... Friars Point, MS ............ Montezuma Bar, MS ......... Montezuma Towhead, AR ..... Prairie Point, AR ............ Flower Lake, MS ........... Walnut Bend, AR .......... St. Francis Towhead, MS ...... 949 L 953 L 958 R 1,220' 8,935 16,150 29,927 6,795 23,088 (1.29 Miles) (8) 603 616 621 624 627 630 631 638 639 640 649 652 657 656 668 668 681 671 R R L R L R L R L L R L L R R L R L 4,350 15,776 56,317 (6) 300 900 850 300 --. 1,500 1,200 -- 2,043,350 (387.0 Miles) -- 9,080 -- 20,670 -- 4,320 -- 5,040 -- 5,520 -- 7,330 -- 2,530 -- 23,180 -- 2,600 -- 5,640 -- 6,580 -- 6,870 -- 15,240 -- 3,450 -- 10,391 -- 11,060 -- 6,3902 -- 3,380 O 0 O 0 0 O y O O TABLE 41-J BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (Continued) (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Dikes: (8) (6) Below Walnut Bend, AR ...... . 676 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,8402 Bordeaux Point, MS .............. 681 L -------- -- -- -- 10,7302 Peters, AR .. T............... 693 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,830 Commerce, MS .............. 694 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10,745 Basket Bar, AR ............. ... 696 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,810 Buck Island, MS .............. 700 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,7052 Porter Lake, AR ............ ... 701 R -- -- -- -- 300 -- 23,1152 Pickett, MS ................ 704 L -- -- -- -- -- --- 10,0802 Seyppel, AR ................ 706 R -- -- -- -- -- -- 16,2302 Cat Island, AR ............. ... 710 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 15,590 Coahoma, TN ............... 718 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,640 Armstrong, AR-TN .......... ... 720 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 18,690 Dismal Point, AR ........... 724 R 3,450 -- -- -- -- -- -- 28,960 Engineers Bar, AR ........... .. 734 R -- -- -- -- -- 4,155 Hopefield Point, AR ......... ... 736 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,350 Memphis Front, TN .......... .. 736 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,300 Robinson Crusoe, TN ......... .. 738 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 21,939 Loosahatchie Bar, TN ........ ... 739 R -- -- -- -- -- 800 -- 3,950 Sycamore Chute, AR-TN ...... 741 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,725 Above Loosahatchie, TN ...... 742 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10,645 Redman Point, AR ........... .. 743 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,750 Randolph Point, TN .......... .. 747 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 16,9402 Poker Point, AR ............ 748 R -- -- -- -- -- 100 -- 8,060 Shelby Forest, TN ............ 751 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,5402 Corona Bar, TN-AR .......... .. 755 R -- -- -- -- -- 100 -- 9,400 Densford, TN .............. ... 757 L -- -- -- -- -- 100 -- 7,780 Cedar Point, TN ............ ... 759 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,890 Below Richardson Landing, TN .............. .. 767 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,950 a I 1 C/1 C/1 1 1 C/1 ICI b ICI 7 Mjr I M 1 MCI 0 Z TABLE 41-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Dikes: Lookout, TN-AR ............ Plum Point, TN ............. Lake Neark, AR ............ Island 30 ................. Kate Aubrey, TN ............ Keyes Point, TN ............ Ashport-Goldust, TN-AR ...... Forked Deer, TN ............ Island 25, AR .............. Nebraska Point, TN .......... Below Tamm Bend, TN ....... Wrights Point, AR ........... Island 21, Chute, TN ......... Head of Island 21, TN ........ Island 20, MO-TN ........... Island 18, TN .............. Tennemo, TN .............. Blaker Towhead, TN ......... Caruthersville-Linwood Bend, MO ............... Opposite Carthersville, TN ..... Sandy Hook, TN ............ Island 15, TN .............. Robinson Bayou, MO ........ Hathaway, TN .............. Island 15 Neck, TN .......... Above Lee Towhead, TN ...... Below Cherokee, TN ......... Stewart Towhead, MO ........ (8) 771 784 786 787 791 791 795 798 804 808 813 820 824 828 831 837 842 843 844 846 850 851 853 854 854 859 866 871 R L R R R L R L R L L R L L R L L L (6) 300 1,200 1,00 1,00 1,500 35--0 400- .-- -- 1,200 --. 350 400 1,100 600 100 12,865 10,195 2,545 5,485 11,270 24,690 17,330 8,550 5,450 12,149 8,300 34,775 3,170 15,540 21,969 8,670 8,240 4,080 -- 30,590 -- 3,300 -- 2,350 -- 8,830 -- 10,768 -- 27,355 -- 21,100 -- 1,300 -- 6,230 -- 18,290 0 o 00 O 0 t0I= O 0 0y QO TABLE 41-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Dikes: (8) (6) Ruddles Point, MO .......... 874 R -- -- -- -- -- 1,500 -- 8,130 Island 11, MO .............. ... 882 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,330 New Madrid Bend, MO ....... .... 887 R -- -- -- -- -- 200 -- 1,715 Kentucky Point, KY ......... .. 887 L 3,210 -- -- -- -- -- -- 15,610 Morrison Towhead, MO ....... .. 890 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,070 Hotchkiss Bend, MO ... ...... .. 895 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,208 Slough Landing, KY ......... ... 896 L -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,065 Below Island 9, TN .......... ... 901 L -- -- -- -- -- 200 -- 18,859 Donaldson Point, MO ........ 905 R -- -- -- -- -- 600 -- 22,9752 Island 9, KY ............... ... 906 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,010 s Island 7 - Island 8, MO-KY .... 917 R -- -- -- -- -- 150 -- 14,795 Below Williams, KY ......... ... 925 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,640 Moore Island, KY-MO ........ .. 929 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,925 Above Williams, KY ......... ... 930 L -- -- -- -- -- 400 -- 1,150 Wolf Island Bar, KY ......... ... 933 L -- -- -- -- -- 3,000 -- 12,260 Campbell, KY ............... 942 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,610 Pritchard, MO ............... 944 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 9,390 Island 1, KY ............... ... 948 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 17,345 Total Dikes Memphis District, Mississippi River ......... 8,610 -- -- -- -- 18,300 -- 961,583 (1.63 Miles) (182.12 Miles) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). Changed to correct previous errors. Lumber mattress revetment. Rock Groins. Linear feet of triangular frame retards and pile dikes. Linear feet of dike on which repairs were made. Stone paving only. Linear feet of dike which were raised. O4 0 zl~ TABLE 41-K PROJECT LEVEES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Levees and Floodwalls Berm' Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section Cur- In Corn- Cur- In Corn- Curin Total rently System plete rently System plete rently Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru Under for This This This Con- Comrn- This This Con- Com- This This Con- Location System FY FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction Main Stem Levees Mississippi River Levees Fifth Louisiana Levee District... Levees .................. Old River structures and levees .................. Atchafalaya Basin Levee District ................ Levees.................. Morganza structure and levee .................. Morganza forebay levee ...... Port Allen lock ............ Lafourche Basin Levee District Levees ................. Plaquemines West Levee District Levees ........... Buras Levee District ......... Levees ................. Empire lock ............. Baton Rouge front levees ...... Pontchartrain Levee District .......... ... ..... Levees ................. Bonnet Carre' guide levees .. . Bonnet Carre' forebay levee .. Bonnet Carre' structure ..... East Jefferson Levee District Levees ................. West Jefferson Levee District .. Levees ...... ..... Floodwalls .............. Harvey Canal Lock ......... (16.8) (16.8) (--) (13.3) 15.5 15.5 -- 12.0 1.3 1.3 -- 1.3 (126.3) (126.3) (6.2) (126.3) 118.7 118.7 6.2 118.7 0.8 6.7 0.1 0.8 -- 6.7 -- 0.1 -- 61.7 61.7 (--) (--) (--) (--) (--) (1.0) (--) (1.0) -- 1.0 -- 1.0 0.8 6.7 0.1 -- 61.7 37.9 37.9 -- 30.7 (34.1) (34.1) -- (34.1) 34.0 34.0 -- 34.0 0.1 0.1 -- 0.1 2.1 2.1 -- 1.9 -- 0.1 -- 0.1 7.2 (--) -- (124.9) (124.9) (--) (111.2) (12.5) 110.8 110.8 -- 97.1 12.5 11.3 11.3 -- 11.3 -- 1.3 1.3 -- 1.3 -- 1.5 1.5 -- 1.5 -- 11.6 11.6 -- 10.8 (20.0) (20.0) -- (20.0) 19.8 19.8 -- 19.8 0.1 0.1 -- 0.1 0.1 0.1 -- 0.1 (--) (--) (--) (0.1) (--) (--) 0.1 -- -- (--) (--) (--) (--) -- -- 0 (--) (15.5) -- 15.5 (--) (118.7) -- 118.7 (--) (15.5) -- 15.5 (__--) (118.7) -- 118.7 (--) (--) O 0 O 0 n t 7d IC O ,< ,< IC r3 O 7d -- 61.7 -- 37.9 (--) (34.0) -- 34.0 -- 2.1 (--) (110.8) -- 110.8 -- 11.6 (--) (19.9) -- 19.8 -- 0.1 -- 61.7 -- 37.9 (--) (34.0) -- 34.0 -- 2.1 (--) (110.8) -- 110.8 -- 11.6 (--__) (19.9) -- 19.8 -- 0.1 (--) (--) (--) -- (--) TABLE 41-K (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Levees and Floodwalls Berm Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section Cur- In Comrn- Cur- In Com- Curin Total rently System plete rently System plete rently Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru Under for This This This Con- Com- This This Con- Corn- This This Con- Location System FY FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction Orleans Levee District ........... . Left descending, east bank ........ Levees ..................... Floodwalls .................. IHNC lock .................. Right descending, west bank ...... Levees ..................... Algiers Canal lock ............ S Lake Borgne Basin Levee SDistrict Levees.............. Grand Prairie Levee District Levees ..................... Total Mississippi River ........ Other Levees Included in Mainstem Atchafalaya Basin Atchafalaya River and Bayou des Glaises ............ East Bank Atchafalaya River ..... Bayou des Glaises ............ West bank Atchafalaya River ..... Simmesport Ring ............. Melville Ring ................ Krotz Springs Ring ............ Mansura Hills to Hamburg....... West protection levee, Hamburg to Berwick drainage canal via Calumet .................... Levees west of Berwick, Berwick drainage canal to Charenton drainage canal ............... Morganza upper guide levee ...... (27.2) (27.2) (--) (24.9) (--) (13.3) (13.3) (--) (11.0) (--) 4.6 4.6 -- 2.3 -- 8.6 8.6 -- 8.6 -- 0.1 0.1 -- 0.1 -- (13.9) (13.9) (--) (13.9) (--) 13.8 13.8 -- 13.8 -- 0.1 0.1 -- 0.1 -- 11.6 11.6 -- 11.6 - 37.4 37.4 -- 37.4 -- 511.6 511.6 6.2 483.9 19.7 (148.4) (148.4) (--) (143.9) (--) 52.5 52.5 -- 52.5 -- 7.9 7.9 -- 7.9 -- 60.1 60.1 -- 55.6 -- 1.6 1.6 -- 1.6 -- 4.1 4.1 -- 4.1 -- 1.7 1.7 -- 1.7 -- 20.5 20.5 -- 20.5 -- 128.7 128.7 1.7 106.5 56.5 56.5 -- 17.1 8.9 8.9 -- 8.9 3.5 7.4 (--) (18.4) (--) (4.6) -- 4.6 (--) (13.8) -- 13.8 -- -- -- -- 11.6 11.2.-- 2 --- - 11.--.11 -- 37.4 -- 479.6 (--) (148.4) -- 52.5 -- 7.9 -- 60.1 -- 1.6 -- 4.1 -- 1.7 -- 20.5 -- -- -- -- 128.7 -- -- -- -- 56.5 -- -- -- -- 8.9 (--) (--) (--) (--) -- (--) (18.4) (--) (4.6) -- 4.6 (--) (13.8) -- 13.8 -- 11.6 -- 37.4 -- 479.6 (--) (148.4) -- 52.5 -- 7.9 -- 60.1 -- 1.6 -- 4.1 -- 1.7 -- 20.5 -- 128.4 -- 56.5 -- 8.9 I0/ (--) (--) (--) i- (jj) ii (--) (--) (--) (--) (--) (--) TABLE 41-K (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Levees and Floodwalls Berm' Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section Cur- In Corn- Cur- In Com- Curin Total rently System plete rently System plete rently Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru Under for This This This Con- Com- This This Con- Com- This This Con- Location System FY FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction East Protection levee, Morganza to Cutoff Bayou, including 19.5 miles of Morganza lower guide levee ................... Total Atchafalaya Basin ........... Total-Main Stem Leaves .......... TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN MR&T PROJECT t Lake Pontchartrain, LA ........... Item A levees ................ Item B levees ................ Item C levees ................. Total Tributary Levees in MR&T Project ...................... GRAND TOTAL. ............... 106.7 106.7 0.2 94.9 -- 449.2 449.2 1.9 371.3 10.9 960.8 960.8 8.1 855.2 30.6 (17.4) (17.4) (--) (17.4) 5.0 5.0 -- 5.0 10.1 10.1 -- 10.1 (--) --_ 2.3 2.3 -- 2.3 -- 17.4 17.4 -- 17.4 -- 978.2 978.2 8.1 872.6 -- -- -- -- 105.0 -- 86.0 -- -- -- -- 447.5 -- 428.2 1.2 -- 1.1 -- 927.1 -- 907.8 (--) (17.4) -- 5.0 -- 10.1 (--) (17.4) -- 5.0 -- 10.1 -- 2.3 -- 2.3 -- -- -- -- 17.4 -- 1.2 -- 1.1 -- 944.5 -- 17.4 -- 925.2 1. Landside seepage berms only. 2. Changed to correct previous error. O 0 0 0 n 0d O y C< O z0 (--) --. (--) (--) (--) PROJECT LEVEES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Levees and Floodwalls Berm Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and In Total Total Section Cur- In Comrn- Cur- System Corn- Curin Total rently System plete rently When plete rently Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under Corn- Built Thru Under for This This This Con- Comrn- This This Con- pleted This This Con- Location System FY FY FY2 struction pleted' FY FY struction FY FY struction MAIN STEM LEVEES Mississippi River Levees East bank in Mississippi ......... . 178.34 178.3 -- 109.1 7.6 156.9 8.16 135.0 -- 174.2 Greenville Harbor dikes ....... 7.8 7.8 -- 7.8 -- -- -- -- -- 2.7 West bank in Arkansas .......... 75.6 75.6 -- 55.0 -- 61.3 -- 54.3 -- 75.4 West bank in Louisiana (above Red River)............. . 1..198.7 198.7 -- 68.1 14.2 91.0 -- 70.6 4.3 197.8 Total Mississippi River Levees .................. 460.4 460.4 w- Other Levees Included in Main Stem Lower Red River-South Bank Red River levees ............. . (59.2) (59.2) (--) (59.2) Hotwells to Moncla, LA, levees .................... 59.2 59.2 -- 59.2 Arkansas River, South Bank .... 85.4 85.4 -- 85.4 Total Other Levees Included in -- 240.0 21.8 309.2 8.1 259.9 4.3 450.1 (--) (--) (--) (--) (--) (59.2) -- -- -- -- -- 59.2 -- 24.7 -- 24.7 -- 84.1 Main Stem ................ 144.6 144.6 -- 144.6 -- 24.7 -- 24.7 -- 143.3 Total--Main Stem Levees ....... . 605.0 605.0 -- 384.6 21.8 333.9 8.1 284.6 4.3 593.4 TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN MR&T PROJECT Arkansas River, North bank ...... 61.55 56.2 -- 56.2 Red River Backwater Levees ..... 263.6 196.9 4.8 193.0 -- 8.3 -- 8.3 -- 47.4 4.4 -- -- -- -- 249.0 -- 47.4 -- 4.8 193.0 4.4 TABLE 41-L -- 174.2 -- 2.7 -- 75.4 -- 197.8 -- 450.1 (--) (59.2) -- 59.2 -- 81.1 -- 140.3 -- 590.4 (--) 7 I= 0z TABLE 41-L (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Levees and Floodwalls Berm' Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section Cur- In Corn- Cur- In Con- Curin Total rently System plete rently System plete rently Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru Under for This This This Con- Com- This This Con- Com- This This Con- Location System FY FY FY2 struction pleted3 FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction Yazoo River Basin .............. (624.1) (425.3) (--) (237.6) (--) (--) (--) (--) (--) (624.1) (--) (338.9) (2.1) Headwater ................... . 527.5 373.7 -- 186.0 -- -- -- -- -- 527.5 -- 299.9 2.1 Backwater ................... 96.6 51.6 -- 51.6 -- -- -- -- -- 96.6 -- 39.0 -- Total Tributary Levees in MR&T Project ............. . 949.2 678.4 4.8 486.8 4.4 8.3 -- 8.3 -- 920.5 4.8 579.3 6.5 GRAND TOTAL................ . 1,554.2 1,283.4 4.8 871.4 26.2 342.2 8.1 292.9 4.3 1,513.9 4.8 1,169.7 6.5 1. Landside seepage berms only. 2. Levee that has adequate freeboard based on the refined 1973 MR&T project flood flow line for the Mississippi River. Levees with more than 2 feet of freeboard are considered adequate. 3. Subject to change as planning progresses. Does not include existing berms which need restudy. 4. Includes 1.4 miles of concrete floodwall and 0.3 mile of levee on Vicksburg city front. 5. Includes 5.3 miles for Gillett new levee. 6. Relief wells used in place of berms. O 0 O y n O y 0 0 TABLE 41-M PROJECT LEVEES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Levees and Floodwalls Berms Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section Cur- In Corn- Cur- In Con- Curin Total rently System plete rently System plete rently Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru Under for This This This Con- Comrn- This This Con- Comrn- This This Con- Location System FY FY FY struction pleted" FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction MAIN STEM LEVEES Mississippi River M ounds, IL .................. Mound City, IL ............... Cairo Drainage District, IL ....... City of Cairo, IL ............... Little River Drainage District, MO .. Levee District No. 2, Scott County, MO ................ Levee District No. 3, Mississippi County, MO ................ St. Johns Levee and Drainage District, M O ................ St. Francis Levee District of MO ..................... City of Hickman, KY ........... Board of Levee Commissioners Fulton, County, KY ........... Reelfoot Levee District of Lake and Obion Counties, TN ........ Madrid Bend Levee District, Lake Co., TN ................ Lake County Levee and Drainage District, TN ................. Dyer County Levee and Drainage District No. 1, TN ............ Tipton-Obion levee extension ...... St. Francis Levee District of AR ..................... Helena Improvement District No. 1, AR .................. Cotton Belt Levee District No. 1, AR................... 3.9 3.9 -- 3.9 2.7 2.7 -- 2.7 13.82 13.8 -- 7.8 6.2 6.2 -- 2.24 19.3 19.3 -- 19.3 13.8 13.8 -- 3.8 4 26.0 26.0 -- 26.0 59.03 58.7 -- 58.2 55.7 55.7 -- 48.74 1.4 1.4 -- 1.4 16.7 16.7 -- 16.7 4.5 4.5 -- 5.2 5.2 -- 4.5 5.2 17.0 17.0 -- 17.0 21.3 21.3 -- 21.3 6.5 -- -- -- 156.7 156.7 -- 153.2 5.3 5.3 -- 5.3 0.5 2.5 1.6 4.4 9.7 -- 0.5 -- 2.5 -- 2.0 -- 4.9 -- 4.8 4.8 4.8 -- 12.9 -- 4.9 -- 9.2 -- -- -- 23.0 -- 12.0 -- 15.1 -- 0.6 -- 9.6 -- 1.3 -- 11.4 -- 0.3 -- 9.4 -- 0.4 -- 89.2 -- 88.4 -- 2.4 -- 2.4 3.6 1.1 8.5 4.0 19.3 -- 13.8 -- 26.0 -- 46.9 -- 55.1 -- 0.5 -- 16.3 -- 4.5 -- 5.2 -- 3.6 -- 1.1 -- 8.5 -- 3.5 -- 19.3 -- 13.8 -- 26.0 -- 46.1 -- 55.1 -- 16.3 -- 4.3 -- 5.2 -- 17.0 1.1 17.0 -- 21.3 -- 21.3 -- 6.5 -- -- -- 156.7 -- 4.7 -- 156.7 -- 4.2 23.9 23.9 -- 23.9 -- 19.4 -- 19.4 M 1 C/1 b F 1 M 7 h 1 h i h l 0 -- 23.9 -- 2 . TABLE 41-M (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Levees and Floodwalls Berms Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section Cur- In Corn- Cur- In Com- Curin Total rently System plete rently System plete rently Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru Under for This This This Con- Coin- This This Con- Coin- This This Con- Location System FY FY FY struction pletedU FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction Laconia Drainage and Levee District Phillips County, AR ..... Laconia Levee District No. 1 of Deshna County, AR ........... Laconia Circle Special Drainage District of Deshna County, AR ................ Yazoo-Mississippi Delta Levee District, MS ................. Madrid Bend L.D., Fulton Co., KY ....................... Birds Point-New Madrid setback levee, MO .................. Total Mississippi River ........ TOTAL MAIN STEM LEVEES ..... TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN MR&T PROJECT St. Francis River ................ East bank ................... West bank ................... Little River ................... East bank (left) ................ W est bank .................... Elk Chute .................... West Basin and middle valley ..... Lower White River .............. White River backwater levee ...... Augusta to Clarendon ........... Clarendon levee ............... 20.5 20.5 -- 20.5 18.1 18.1 -- 18.1 6.6 6.6 -- 6.6 93.6 93.6 -- 93.6 -- 11.5 -- 12.6 -- 11.5 -- 9.2 -- 88.6 1.3 88.6 -- 20.5 -- 16.5 -- 93.6 -- 20.5 -- 16.5 -- 93.6 -- 4.8 4.8 -- 4.8 -- -- -- -- -- 4.8 -- 4.8-- 35.3 35.3 -- 35.3 -- 23.8 -- -- -- 35.3 -- 35.3 -- 637.8 631.0 -- 597.56 -- 342.7 6.1 272.6 -- 605.6 -- 596.6 -- 637.8 631.0 -- 597.56 -- 342.7 6.1 272.6 -- 605.6 -- 596.6 -- (308.2) (302.9) -- (302.9) -- -- -- -- -- (301.0) -- (133.5) -- 159.5 156.2 -- 156.2 -- -- -- -- -- 156.7 -- 94.7 -- 148.7 146.7 -- 146.7 -- -- -- -- -- 144.3 -- 38.8 -- (130.1) (130.1) -- (130.1) -- -- -- -- -- (128.9) -- (94.5) -- 40.7 40.7 -- 40.7 -- -- -- -- -- 40.7 -- 40.1 -- 35.1 35.1 -- 35.1 -- -- -- -- -- 35.1 -- 23.7 -- 39.9 39.9 -- 39.9 -- -- -- -- -- 39.7 -- 17.3 -- 14.4 14.4 -- 14.4 -- -- -- -- -- 13.4 -- 13.4 -- (95.6) (85.9) -- (84.1) -- -- -- -- -- (94.0) (--) (81.0) -- 40.2 40.2 -- 40.2 -- -- -- -- -- 38.8 -- 38.8 -- 49.2 39.5 -- 39.5 -- -- -- -- -- 49.2 -- 36.2 -- 6.2 6.2 -- 4.4 -- -- -- -- -- 6.0 -- 6.0 -- 0 0 0 0 0 yp 0d O TABLE 41-M (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Levees and Floodwalls Berms Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section Cur- In Corn- Cur- In Com- Curin Total rently System plete rently System plete rently Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru Under for This This This Con- Corn- This This Con- Com- This This Con- Location System FY FY FY struction pleted" FY FY struction pleted/ FY FY struction Memphis Harbor ................ 10.5 10.5 -- 10.5 -- 7.0 -- 7.0 -- 10.5 -- 10.5 Total Tributary Levees in MR&T Project ............... . 544.4 529.4 -- 527.6 -- 7.0 -- 7.0 -- 534.4 -- 319.5 -- GRAND TOTAL................ 1,182.2 1,160.4 -- 1,125.1 -- 349.7 6.1 279.6 -- 1,140.0 1.1 916.1 -- 1. Subject to change as planning progresses. 2. Includes 5.1 miles of Cache River levee. This levee was enlarged to 1928 grades with Federal funds, but since that time has been classified as a secondary levee. 3. Includes 12.1 miles of Farrenburg levee. This levee was enlarged to 1928 grades with Federal funds, but since that time has been classified as a secondary levee. S 4. Deficient in freeboard as a result of 1996 Revised Project Design Flood flowline. 5. Landside seepage berms only. 6. Changed to correct previous error. 0 ;z TABLE 41-N RECAPITULATION PROJECT LEVEE TABLES 42-K, -L, AND -M (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Levees and Floodwalls Berms Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section Cur- In Corn- Cur- In Corn- Curin Total rently System plete rently System plete rently Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru Under for This This This Con- Comrn- This This Con- Comrn- This This Con- Location System FY FY FY struction pleted3 FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction MAIN STEM LEVEES Mississippi River New Orleans District, Table 41-K ................. Vicksburg District, Table 41-L ..... Memphis District, Table 41-M ..... Total Mississippi River ........ Other Levees Included in Main Stem Atchafalaya Basin Floodway-- NOD ...................... Lower Red River-South Bank-- VXD ..................... Arkansas River-South Bank-- VXD ..................... Total Other Levees Included in Main Stem ............. Total Main Stem Levees ...... TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN MR&T PROJECT Lake Pontchartrain, LA,--NOD ...... Yazoo River Basin--VXD ......... Arkansas River-North Bank-- V X D ...................... Red River Backwater--VXD ....... St. Francis River--MD ........... 511.6 511.6 6.2 483.9 460.4 460.4 -- 240.0 637.8 631.0 -- 597.5 1,609.8 1,603.0 6.2 1,321.4 449.2 449.2 1.9 371.3 59.2 59.2 -- 59.2 85.4 85.4 -- 85.4 593.8 593.8 1.9 515.9 2,203.6 2,196.8 8.1 1,837.3 17.4 17.4 -- 17.4 624.1 425.3 -- 237.6 61.5 56.2 -- 56.2 263.6 196.9 4.8 193.0 308.2 302.9 -- 302.9 19.7 21.8 41.5 10.9 1.2 -- 1.1 -- 479.6 309.2 8.1 259.9 4.3 450.1 342.7 6.1 266.5 -- 605.6 653.1 14.2 533.6 4.3 1,535.3 -- -- -- -- 447.5 -- -- -- -- -- 59.2 -- 24.7 -- 24.7 -- 84.1 10.9 24.7 -- 24.7 -- 590.8 52.4 677.8 14.2 558.3 4.3 2,126.1 -- -- -- -- -- 17.4 -- -- -- -- -- 624.1 8.3 -- -- 8.3 4.4 -- 47.4 -- 249.0 -- 301.0 1. Landside seepage berms only. 2. Subject to change as planning progresses. 3. 1996 Revised Project Design Flood flowline identified freeboard deficiencies. 4. Changed to correct previous error. 5. Relief wells have been used in lieu of seepage berms in some reaches of the Miss. River Levees. O 0 O 0 n 0 7d , O ,y O,,, -- 479.6 -- 450.1 -- 596.6 -- 1,526.3 -- 428.2 -- 59.2 -- 81.1 -- 568.5 -- 2,094.8 -- 17.4 -- 338.9 -- 47.4 4.8 193.0 -- 133.5 4.4 -- TABLE 41-N (Continued) RECAPITULATION PROJECT LEVEE TABLES 42-K, -L, AND -M (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Levees and Floodwalls Berms Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section Cur- In Comrn- Cur- In Com- Curin Total rently System plete rently System plete rently Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru Under for This This This Con- Comrn- This This Con- Comrn- This This Con- Location System FY FY FY struction pleted! FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction Little River--MD ................ 130.1 130.1 -- 130.1 -- -- -- -- -- 128.9 -- 94.5 -- Lower White River--MD .......... 95.6 85.9 -- 84.1 -- -- -- -- -- 94.0 -- 81.0 -- Memphis Harbor--MD ............ 10.5 10.5 -- 10.5 -- 7.0 -- 7.0 -- 10.5 -- 10.5 -- Total Tributary Levees in MR&T Project .............. 1,511.0 1,225.2 4.8 1,031.8 4.4 15.3 -- 15.3 -- 1,472.3 4.8 916.2 4.4 Grand Total in Project .......... 3,714.6 3,422.0 12.9 2,869.1 56.8 691.2 14.2 573.6 4.3 3,598.4 4.8 3,011.0 4.4 S 1. Landside seepage berms only. 2. Subject to change as planning progresses. 3. 1996 Revised Project Design Flood flowline identified freeboard deficiences. 4. Changed to correct previous error. 5. Relief wells have been used in lieu of seepage berms in some reaches of the Miss. River Levees. Cn O REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 41-0 CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Total In Complete System Built Thru Currently Year When This This Percent Under Location Initiated Completed FY FY Complete Construction (Miles) Bayou des Glaises diversion channel 1938 6.0 -- 6.0 100 -- Bayous Rapides, Boeuf, and Cocodrie 1946 92.6 -- 63.4 75 -- Charenton drainage and navigation canal 1939 6.3 -- 6.3 100 -- Wax Lake Outlet 1938 15.7 -- 15.7 100 -- Atchafalaya Basin Floodway 1933 244.2 -- 186.4 76 -- Morganza Floodway 1941 3.3 -- 3.3 100 -- Old River outflow channel 1956 8.3 -- 8.3 100 -- Old River inflow channel 1960 2.3 -- 2.3 100 -- Old River lock approach channels 1961 2.2 -- 2.2 100 -- Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp) 1958 2.5 -- 2.5 100 -- Teche-Vermilion Water Supply 1977 6.3 -- 6.3 100 -- Old River Auxiliary Control Structure inflow channel 1986 1.9 -- 1.9 100 -- Old River Auxiliary Control Structure outflow channel 1988 0.9 -- 0.9 100 -- Caernarvon Freshwater Diversion channel 1988 1.7 -- 1.7 100 -- 41-80 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-P CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Total In Complete System Built Thru Currently Year When This This Percent Under Location Initiated Completed FY FY Complete Construction (Miles) BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, ETC., MS Big Sunflower River ...................... 1947 199.1 -- 199.1 100 -- Quiver River ............................ 1947 69.6 -- 69.6 100 -- Deer Creek ............................. 1947 7.0 -- 7.0 100 -- Steele Bayou ............................ 1947 54.9 -- 54.9 100 -- Steele Bayou' ........................... 1965 71.2 -- 71.2 100 -- M ain Canal ............................. 1959 21.1 -- 21.1 100 -- M ain Canal2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -- 25.3 -- 13.9 55 11.4 Black Bayou ............................ 1992 36.5 13.8 20.1 55 6.8 Big Sunflower River tributaries ............... 1957 227.2 -- 227.2 100 -- Quiver River tributaries .................... 1960 35.4 -- 35.4 100 -- YAZOO BACKWATER Yazoo Backwater ......................... 1960 39.9 -- 39.9 100 -- YAZOO BASIN HEADWATER, MS Upper Yazoo Project ...................... 1976 179.0 4.1 71.0 40 5.3 Coldwater River ......................... 1941 54.6 -- 54.6 100 -- Arkabutla Canal .......................... 1948 0.4 -- 0.4 100 -- Tallahatchie Canal ........................ 1940 74.8 -- 73.5 98 -- Little Tallahatchie River and Panola-Quitman Floodway ................. 1939 48.0 -- 48.0 100 -- Greenwood protection works ................. . 1971 2.9 -- 2.9 100 -- Yacona River ........................... 1952 1.8 -- 1.8 100 -- Bobo Bayou ............ .................... 1944 16.1 -- 16.1 100 -- Cassidy Bayou .......................... 1934 69.0 -- 69.0 100 -- Cassidy Bayou3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -- 26.0 -- -- -- -- Bear Creek Diversion ...................... -- 4.8 -- -- -- -- Lake Cormorant .......................... -- 20.9 -- -- -- -- Hurricane Bayou ......................... -- 2.5 -- -- -- -- Opossum Bayou ......................... -- 20.8 -- -- -- -- Abaica Creek ........................... -- 7.7 -- -- -- -- Chicopa Creek ........................... -- 7.0 -- -- -- -- Bear Creek ............................. -- 23.3 -- -- -- -- Rocky Bayou ........................... -- 7.8 -- -- -- -- Whiteoak Bayou ......................... -- 55.9 -- -- -- -- Miscellaneous ditches ....................... -- 12.3 -- -- -- -- Yalobusha River ......................... .. 1939 46.0 -- 46.0 100 -- Yazoo River ............................ .. 1940 160.2 -- 160.2 100 -- Whittington Auxiliary Channel ............... . 1956 30.8 -- 30.8 100 -- Tchula Lake ............................ . 1964 26.4 -- 26.4 100 -- David-Burrell Bayou ...................... .. 1957 40.4 -- 40.4 100 -- McKinney Bayou ......................... . 1960 3.5 -- 3.5 100 -- 41-81 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 41-P CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: (Continued) VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Total In Complete System Built Thru Currently Year When This This Percent Under Location Initiated Completed FY FY Complete Construction (Miles) YAZOO BASIN HEADWATER, MS (Continued) Hillside Floodway ........................ 1964 11.0 -- 11.0 100 -- Yazoo City protection works ................. 1953 1.6 -- 1.6 100 -- Ascalmore-Tippo Bayous ................... 1975 30.2 -- 15.1 50 -- Alligator-Catfish Bayou .................... 1973 8.3 -- 8.2 99 -- PeluciaCreek ........................... 1975 11.7 .2 11.7 100 -- BOEUF & TENSAS RIVERS, ETC., LA AND AR Bayou Lafourche ......................... 1949 45.3 -- 45.3 100 -- Bayou Lafourche 4'7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1972 43.0 -- 4.4 10 -- Big & Colewa Creeks ..................... 1947 81.4 -- 81.4 100 -- Big & Colewa Creeks5'7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1965 86.8 -- 51.5 60 -- Tensas River ............................ 1947 96.5 -- 96.5 100 -- Tensas River 6 ......................... 1968 165.0 -- 61.0 37 -- Boeuf River, AR and LA ................... 1953 103.9 -- 103.9 100 -- Fleschmans Bayou, AR .................... 1963 6.6 -- 6.6 100 -- Caney Bayou, AR ........................ 1964 7.4 -- 7.4 100 -- Canal 18, AR ........................... 1963 10.3 -- 10.3 100 -- Big Bayou, AR .......................... 1952 33.3 -- 33.3 100 -- Black Pond Slough, AR .................... 1962 14.3 -- 14.3 100 -- Bayou Macon, AR and LA .................. 1959 150.8 -- 150.8 100 -- Rush Bayou, AR .............. ........... 1964 6.7 -- 6.7 100 -- Canal 19, AR ........................... 1957 50.2 -- 50.2 100 -- Canal 43, AR ........................... 1956 34.5 -- 34.5 100 -- Canal 81, AR ........................... 1957 32.7 -- 32.7 100 -- Mill Bayou-Bayou Vidal-Bayou Vidal Cutoff ........................... -- 17.1 -- -- -- -- Kirsch Lake Canal ........................ -- 9.3 -- -- -- -- Canal 19 Extension ....................... 1964 9.4 -- 9.4 100 -- Lake Chicot Pumping Plant ................. -- 2.5 -- 2.5 100 -- Mill Bayou ............................... 1955 4.8 -- 4.8 100 -- RED RIVER BACKWATER, LA Tensas-Cocodrie Pumping Plant .............. .. 1976 6.9 -- 6.9 100 -- Six Mile Bayou, LA ...................... -- 1.5 -- 1.5 100 -- 1. Includes further work on 54.9 miles and adds 16.3 miles of channel to the project. 2. Includes further work on 21.1 miles and adds 1.1 miles of channel to the project. 3. Includes further work on 26.0 miles. 4. Includes further work on 38.6 miles and adds 4.4 miles of channel to the project. 5. Includes further work on 75.3 miles and adds 11.5 miles of channel to the project. 6. Includes further work on 96.5 miles and adds 68.5 additional miles of channel to the project. 7. Further work on these items has been deferred due to local oppositions and withdrawal of sponsorship by the levee district. 41-82 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-Q CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1998) Total In Complete System Built Thru Currently Year When This This Percent Under Location Initiated Completed FY FY Complete Construction (Miles) BIRDS POINT-NEW MADRID FLOODWAY Birds Point-New Madrid Intercepting Ditch Enlargement, Samos and Vicinity, M O .......................... ST. FRANCIS BASIN Little River Drainage, MO .................. St. Francis River, MO and AR ............... West Memphis Drainage, AR ................ Big Slough and Mayo Ditch, AR .............. Tyronza River, AR ....................... L'Anguille River, AR ...................... LOWER WHITE RIVER BASIN, AR Cache River Basin, AR .................... Big Creek and tributaries, AR ................ WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES Obion Creek, KY ......................... WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES MS River, Western TN tributaries (Backwater Areas) (1946 Act) ............... Obion River Diversion Channel, TN (1946 Act) .......................... Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, KY and TN ......... Running Reelfoot Bayou, TN ................ MS River Below Cape Girardeau: West TN tributaries (1948 Act) .................. Wolf River and tributaries, TN ............... NONCONNAH CREEK, MS AND TN Nonconnah Creek, MS and TN ............... HELENA HARBOR, PHILLIPS COUNTY, AR Helena Harbor, AR(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1952 9.6 1963 1953 1951 1960 1939 (1) 298.9 638.5 19.8 28.0 12.7 95.0 1972 231.5 (') 103.8 (1) 1952 (') 1974 1955 1961 1960 1990 41.7 34.3 9.3 15.8 19.7 225.0 25.5 9.6 100 0 0 298.9 572.9 19.8 28.0 12.7 -- 7.2 -- 34.3 3.0 19.7 -- 89.8 -- 25.5 100 89 100 100 100 3 100 19 100 41 100 18.2 1989 2.5 -- 2.5 100 1. Not started. 2. Data for Stage 1 only. 41-83 0.9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 41-R PUMPING STATIONS: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT Rehabilitation Status (If Applicable) Percent Percent Complete Year Complete Year Authorized Thru Complete Thru Complete Size This (Schedule/ Year This (Schedule/ Name (CFS) FY Actual) Initiated FY Actual) Bayou Yokely 489 100 1955 1990 100 1991(A) Bayou Yokely Enlargement 568 100 1963 1990 100 1991(A) Centerville 332 100 1964 1991 100 1992(A) Ellerslie 136 100 1953 -- -- -- Franklin 144 100 1958 1992 100 1993(A) Franklin Enlargement 144 100 1978 1992 100 1993(A) Gordy 238 100 1964 -- -- -- Maryland 136 100 1957 1991 100 1992(A) North Bend 52 100 1962 -- -- -- Tiger Island 75 100 1955 -- -- -- Wax Lake East 1,008 100 1961 1990 100 1992(A) Wax Lake West 496 100 1965 1990 100 1992(A) Teche Vermilion 1,300 100 1982 -- -- -- Point Coupee1500 100 1983 -- -- -- TOTAL 6,618 41-84 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-S PUMPING STATIONS: VICKSBURG DISTRICT Rehabilitation Status (If Applicable) Percent Percent Complete Year Complete Year Authorized Thru Complete Thru Complete Size This (Schedule/ Year This (Schedule/ Name (CFS) FY Actual) Initiated FY Actual) Chauvin Bayou, LA 250 100 1994 1991 100 Bawcomville 270 100 1955 1992 100 1993(a) Jonesville 180 100 1952 -- -- -- Natchez Port 100 -- -- -- -- -- Wilson Point 50 -- -- -- -- -- Greenwood - Lee Street 90 100 1953 1952 -- -- Greenwood - Wilson Street 67 100 1953 1952 -- -- Greenwood - Walker Lake 675 100 1949 1952 -- -- Yazoo City 540 100 1954 1957 -- -- Columbia 45 100 1939 -- -- -- Calion 200 100 1959 -- -- -- McKinney Bayou, MS 250 100 1962 1961 -- -- Lake Chicot 6,500 100 1987 -- -- -- Tensas Cocodrie 4,000 100 1986 -- -- -- Yazoo Backwater 10,000 -- -- -- -- -- Natchez Area 300 -- -- -- -- -- Bushley Bayou 300 -- Indef' -- -- -- Bushley Bayou 20 -- Indef' -- -- -- Sicily-HAHA Bayou 750 44 2000(') -- -- -- Sicily - Fool River 300 82 1999 -- -- -- Pelucia Creek - Rising Sun #1 10 100 1992 -- -- -- Pelucia Creek - Rising Sun #2 15 100 1992 -- -- -- Pelucia Creek Pump 75 100 1993 -- -- -- Below Red River 500 -- Indef' -- -- -- Bayou Rapides2 222 100 1936 -- -- -- Total 25,709 ' This project has been placed in the inactive category. 41-85 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 41-T PUMPING STATIONS: MEMPHIS DISTRICT Rehabilitation Status (If Applicable) Percent Percent Complete Year Complete Year Authorized Thru Complete Thru Complete Size This (Schedule/ Year This (Schedule/ Name (CFS) FY Actual) Initiated FY Actual) Devall's Bluff 215 100 1949 1987 100 1989 Des Arc, Ark. 30 100 1954 -- -- -- Ensley 900 100 1966 -- -- -- DD #17, Station #1 375 100 ' -- -- -- Huxtable Pumping Plant 12,000 100 1977 -- -- -- Graham Burke 1,500 100 1964 -- -- -- Finley Street 100 100 1978 -- -- -- Dyersburg 26 100 1961 -- -- -- Cotton Slough 50 100 1964 -- -- -- West Hickman 190 100 1976 -- -- -- Cypress Creek 3,000 100 1944 -- ---- Fairfax 53.5 100 1950 -- -- -- Goose Pond 110 100 1976 -- -- -- Marble Bayou 220 100 1952 -- -- -- Workhouse Bayou 520 100 1950 -- -- -- Nonconnah 1,620 100 1944 - -- -- L&DD #3 Peafield 400 100 ' -- -- -- Treasure Island 150 100 1976 -- -- -- Lake No. 9 500 100 1981 -- ---- Cairo 10th Street 65 100 1981 -- -- -- Cairo 28th Street 65 100 1981 -- -- -- DD #17, Station #2 700 100 1981 -- ---- Drinkwater Sewer 150 100 1979 -- -- -- May Street 5 100 1948 -- -- -- Cairo 22nd Street 37 100 ' -- -- Gayoso Bayou 1,500 100 1915 -- ---- Mud Lake 200 -- -- -- -- -- Madison 25 -- -- -- -- -- Cache River 200 -- -- -- -- -- New Madrid 1,500 -- -- -- -- St. John's Bayou1000 -- -- -- -- TOTAL 27,406.5 'Unknown constructed by local interest. 41-86 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-U COSTS DURING FISCAL YEAR 1998 Item Construction Maintenance Other FEDERAL FUNDS Flood control, Mississippi River and tributaries: St. Louis District: St. Francis Basin-Wappapello Lake $ -- $ 6,471,669 $ -- Subtotal 6,471,669 Memphis District: Cache Basin, AR 4,813 ---- Channel improvement 14,642,549 25,907,901 -- Eight Mile Creek 203,074 -- -- General investigations -- -- 3,697,904 Helena & Vicinity 180,625 -- -- Helena Harbor, Phillips County -- 444,215 -- Hickman Bluff, KY 8,547,301 -- -- Horn Lake Creek & Tribs 990,841 -- -- Inspection of completed works -- 729,228 -- Little R. Drainage 803 -- -- Mapping -- 523,879 -- Memphis Harbor (McKeller Lake) -- 1,009,038 -- Nonconnah Creek, TN & MS 162,534 Mississippi River levees 6,431,133 2,958,152 -- St. Francis Basin 6,991,472 7,781,065 -- St. Johns Bayou & New Madrid 2,333,224 -- -- West Tennessee tributaries 1,892,953 -- -- White River Backwater -- 2,195,351 -- Whiteman's Creek, AR -17,505 -- -- Subtotal 42,363,817 41,548,829 3,697,904 Vicksburg District: Channel improvement 12,606,186 15,800,213 -- Dam Safety Assurances 15,150 -- -- General investigations -- -- 327,872 Inspection of completed works -- 268,687 -- Lower Arkansas River -- 74,657 -- Lower Red River--South Bank Red River Levee -- 457,180 -- Mapping -- 359,506 -- Mississippi River levees 10,662,742 1,496,144 -- Tensas Basin 11,147,162 6,238,988 -- Yazoo Basin 29,618,448 25,505,218 -- Subtotal 64,049,688 50,200,593 327,872 41-87 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 41-U COSTS DURING FISCAL YEAR 1998 (Continued) Item Construction Maintenance Other New Orleans District: Atchafalaya Basin Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System B. R. Harbor Devil Swamp Bayou Cocodrie and Tributaries Bonnet Carre Spillway Channel Improvement General Investigations Inspection of Completed Works Louisiana Penitentiary Levee Mapping Mississippi & LA Estuarine Mississippi Delta Region Mississippi River Levees Old River Subtotal Total Federal Funds CONTRIBUTED FUNDS Memphis District Wolf River Reelfoot Lake TN & KY Dyer County Boat Ramp Channel Improvement Horn Lake Creek and Tributaries, TN & MS Helena - W. Helena - Phillips County New Orleans District: Old River Mississippi Delta Region Total Contributed Funds Grand Total, Federal and Contributed Funds 64,570,922 34,048,503 1,246,494 170,984,427 132,269,594 5,272,270 28,567 -- -- 242,811 815 -- -- 251,693 -- -- 14,496 -- 115,009 -- 6,142,217 6,409,221 115,009 271,378 177,393,648 132,384,603 5,543,648 41-88 18,731,159 7,630,995 -- 15,415,184 841,816 269,938 14,975,410 6,706,420 13,318,357 610,473 283,692 71,159 1,386,743 12,272,497 263,768 320,835 -- 340,877 575,417 4,604,685 1,246,494 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-V STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1998 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1998 ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES CHARGEABLE AGAINST FLOOD CONTROL ACT LIMITATIONS: COMPLETED WORKS: Waterways Experiment Station Office, Chief of Engineers Rock Island District: S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 St. Louis District: S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal Memphis District: Des Arc, AR Contraction works DeValls Bluff, AR Mapping Memphis Harbor New Madrid Floodway Wolf River and tributaries Roads on levees (Mississippi River levees) S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal Vicksburg District: Boeuf Basin levees Channel realignment, Arkansas River Contraction works Eudora Floodway Vicksburg Harbor Greenville Harbor Grants Canal (Mississippi River levees) Mapping Jonesville, LA Tensas National Wildlife Refuge, LA Roads on levees S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal $ 874,000 19,158 14,010 $ 874,000 19,158 14,010 1< -c# 109,352 169,.352- 1,076,520 1,076,520 -- 178,925 178,925 -- 8,692,791 8,692,791 -- 231,215 231,215 -- 1,450,337 1,450,337 -- 18,736,432 18,736,432 -- 6,521,543 6,521,543 -- 1,723,620 1,723,620 -- 12,426 12,426 -- 1,998,766 1,998,766 -- 39,546,054 39,546,054 -- 2,764,605 2,764,605 -- 125,074 125,074 -- 1,972,183 1,972,183 -- 826,235 826,235 -- 4,664,515 4,664,515 -- 2,864,516 2,864,516 -- 7,070 7,070 -- 1,531,021 1,531,021 -- 172,950 172,950 -- 3,980,000 3,980,000 -- 105,660 105,660 -- 2,350,201 2,350,201 -- 57 1RA4 1 5'71R4_ -- 41-89 1 / ")" .) / , 1 u"-,V.,,1 J I, I U, VJ I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 41-V (Continued) STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1998 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1998 New Orleans District: Baton Rouge Harbor, LA Atchafalaya River and Basin, LA Bonnet Carre' Spillway, LA Contraction works Mapping Roads on levees S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Wax Lake Outlet and Charenton Canal Morganza Floodway and structure Lake Pontchartrain Teche Vermilion Basin Water Supply Old River Atchafalaya Basin, rights-of-way and flowage, Bayou des Glaises setback Subtotal All other completed items: Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 Impounded savings Plant transferred to revolving fund OCE (portion of allotment transferred to revolving fund, Washington Dist.) Subtotal TOTAL COMPLETED WORKS UNCOMPLETED WORKS: Rock Island District: Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 St. Louis District: Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 Subtotal Memphis District: Mississippi River levees Mississippi River levees New Madrid Channel improvement: Revetments Dredging Dikes 699,185 3,375,492 14,212,198 1,258,916 1,112,967 540,838 2,701,566 10,098,817 35,992,117 5,513,110 34,506,000 292,274,000 14,212,198 1,258,916 -- 540,838 2,701,566 10,098,817 35,992,117 5,513,110 34,506,000 292,274,000 38/,Y91 /36/,91 -- 402,673,123 402,673,123 -- 4,995,215 4,995,215 -- 1,593,097 1,593,097 -- 24,924,578 24,924,578 -- 19,882 19,882 -- 31,532,772 31,532,772 -- 532,012,500 532,012,500 -- 579,462 579,462 -- 1,897,980 1,897,980 -- 27742 9277442 -- , , , , 213,061,354 98,000 430,417,306 58,566,439 229,807,963 213,002,950 98,000 430,393,941 58,566,439 229,710,820 58,404 -- 23,365 9977,1,43143 41-90 o' nl .,- n,- MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-V STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND (Continued) ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1998 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1998 Memphis District: (Continued) Reelfoot Lake 439,434 439,434 -- Reelfoot Lake, Lake No. 9, TN-KY 7,896,000 7,896,000 -- St. Francis Basin: Wappapello Lake 9,019,908 9,019,908 -- St. Francis River and tributaries 295,297,182 294,734,340 562,842 Big Slough and Mayo ditch 965,429 965,429 -- Little River drainage 52,503,092 52,484,511 18,581 Lower White River: Clarendon Levee 652,115 652,115-- Augusta to Clarendon, AR 1,788,846 1,788,846-- White River backwater levee, AR 10,624,501 10,624,501 -- Horn Lake Creek & Tribs 2,127,000 2,106,349 20,651 Hickman Bluff, KY 19,809,600 12,891,024 6,918,576 Memphis Harbor Ensley Berm 3,510,000 3,510,000 -- Nonconnah Creek Recreation Facility 10,910 10,900 10 Nonconnah Creek Environmental Enhancement 11,510 11,502 8 Nonconnah Creek, TN & MS 8,474,580 8,468,329 6,251 West Memphis and Vicinity 571,000 571,000 -- Whiteman's Creek, Ar 1,021,000 1,020,476 524 Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 108,651 108,651 -- West Tennessee Tributaries 52,174,900 52,171,844 3,056 Helena Harbor 15,112,000 15,079,241 32,759 Helena & Vicinity, AR 325,000 251,061 73,939 Cache Basin, AR 10,849,000 10,842,702 6,298 West Kentucky Tributaries 1,440,000 1,440,000 0 Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN 100,000 100,000 0 L'Anguille River 192,000 192,000 -- Eight Mile Creek 2,517,000 2,491,219 25,781 St. Johns Bayou & New Madrid Floodway 2,775,000 2,483,067 291,933 Subtotal 1,432,241,720 1,424,126,599 8,115,121 Vicksburg District: Mississippi River Levees (excludes Grants Canal, $7,070, shown under completed works) 254,297,990 252,902,250 1,395,740 Section 6 Levees 9,000 9,000 -- Lower Arkansas River: North Bank 7,049,414 7,049,414 -- South Bank 15,676,286 15,676,286 -- Tensas Basin: Lake Chicot Pumping Plant 95,639,986 95,639,945 41 Tensas River 41,505,235 41,505,235 -- Red River Backwater: Below Red River 639,400 639,400 -- Red River Backwater Levee, LA 107,868,125 107,173,861 694,264 Tensas Cocodrie Pumping Plant 56,071,200 56,071,167 33 41-91 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 41-V (Continued) STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1998 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1998 Lower Red River South Bank Red River Levees Channel improvement: Revetments Dredging Dikes Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 Ouachita River Levees Yazoo Basin: Sardis Lake Enid Lake Arkabutla Lake Grenada Lake Greenwood Belzoni Yazoo City Will M. Whittington auxiliary channel Big Sunflower, etc. Main Stem Upper Yazoo Projects Yazoo Basin--Tributaries Tributaries (Except Ascal-Tippo-Opossum Bayous) Tributaries--Bank Stabilization Ascalmore-Tippo-Opossum Bayous Yazoo Basin Backwater Yazoo Backwater Rocky Bayou Yazoo Backwater Pumping Plant Muddy Bayou Yazoo Backwater, F&WL Mitigation Yazoo Basin Reformulation Streambank Erosion Control, Eval. and Demo. Demonstration Erosion Control Dam Safety Assurances-Sardis Dam Subtotal New Orleans District: Bayou Cocodrie and Tributaries Miss. & LA Estuarine Channel Improvement: Dredging Revetments Louisiana Penitentiary Levee Lower Red River (South Bank Levees) Levees Under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 756,300 509,220,078 23,919,516 174,947,771 958,175 400,000 26,502,400 21,292,400 16,000,700 45,401,494 11,543,000 316,656 2,205,611 10,950,966 86,002,400 34,562,300 132,369,236 106,284,966 612,484 23,977,200 56,868,000 3,401,500 9,064,850 5,145,200 6,276,500 24,097,170 14,767,000 225,026,100 23,243,000 2,174,869,609 5,008,008 4,471,600 35,945,266 1,027,190,417 966,000 18,056,600 200,680 756,300 508,937,532 23,919,516 174,829,076 958,175 400,000 26,502,400 21,292,400 16,000,700 45,401,494 11,543,000 316,656 2,205,611 10,950,966 85,390,635 34,558,997 131,666,951 106,217,630 612,484 23,977,200 56,866,518 3,401,500 9,064,850 5,145,200 6,265,845 23,992,186 14,767,000 222,764,156 23,230,763 2,168,602,302 5,008,008 4,465,609 35,945,266 1,027,130,760 841,816 18,056,600 200,680 41-92 282,546 -- 118,695 611,765 3,303 702,285 67,336 -- -- -- -- -- -- 611,765 3,303 702,285 67,336 -- -- 1,482 -- 10,655 104,984 -- 2,261,944 12,237 6,267,307 5,991 59,657 124,184 -- -- MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-V STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND (Continued) ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1998 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1998 New Orleans District (Continued): Mississippi River Levees Mississippi Delta Region Atchafalaya Basin Floodway: Atchafalaya Basin Atchafalaya River Navigation Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System Subtotal TOTAL UNCOMPLETED WORKS ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (CONSTRUCTION) Memphis District: L'Anguille River Basin, AR Reelfoot Lake, Lake No. 9 Cache River Big Creek and Tributaries, Lower White River Clarendon Levee, Lower White River West Kentucky Tributaries Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Harris Fork Creek, KY & TN Subtotal Vicksburg District: Yazoo Basin, Big Sunflower River, Steele Bayou Tensas - National Wildlife Refuge, LA Subtotal New Orleans District: Mississippi Delta Region (EP 309) Teche Vermilion Basin-Water Supply East Rapides & S. Central Avoyelles Parishes Subtotal TOTAL ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN TOTAL COMPLETED WORKS, UNCOMPLETED WORKS AND ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 2,396,748,491 2,393,266,200 3,482,291 6,006,337,262 5,988,472,544 17,864,718 150,000 150,000 -- 30,000 30,000 -- 420,000 420,000 -- 365,000 365,000 -- 65,000 65,000-- 175,000 175,000 -- 350,000 350,000 -- 540,000 540,000 -- 2,095,000 2,095,000 -- 29,700 29,700 -- 200,000 200,000 -- 229,700 229,700 -- 69,753 69,753 -- 1,109,000 1,109,000 -- 965,247 965,247 -- 2,144,000 2,144,000 -- 4,468,700 4,468,700 -- 6,542,818,462 6,524,953,744 17,864,718 41-93 355,571,000 61,472,920 822,145,317 303,463 65,417,220 355,261,959 60,259,070 820,761,071 303,463 65,031,898 309,041 1,213,850 1,384,246 '385,322 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 41-V (Continued) STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1998 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1998 RECREATION FACILITIES--COMPLETED PROJECTS Eight-Year Project Funds St. Louis District: Wappapello Lake, MO Wappapello Lake, MO, Rockwood Landing Subtotal Vicksburg District: Sardis Lake Enid Lake Arkabutla Lake Grenada Lake Subtotal Total Eight-Year Program Funds Total chargeable against Flood Control Act Limitations excluding flood control emergencies Total maintenance since Jul. 18, 1941 Total rehabilitation Total flood control emergencies Total general investigations Total flood control, MR&T appropriations Appropriations in addition to flood control, MR&T Other appropriations itemized in footnote (1), pp. 2068-69, Annual Report for 1953 Grand total appropriated to Sep. 30, 1997 2,405,300 203,286 2,405,300 203,286 2,608,586 2,608,586 -- 1,584,339 1,584,339 -- 2,268,209 2,268,209 -- 2,189,280 2,189,280 -- 1,631,281 1,631,281 -- 7,673,109 7,673,109 -- 10,281,695 10,281,695 -- 6,553,100,157 6,535,235,439 17,864,718 3,104,394,555 3,101,536,545 2,858,010 31,113,000 31,113,000 -- 14,900,300 14,900,300 -- 115,909,381 114,402,104 1,507,277 9,819,417,393 9,829,256,297 22,230,005 32,068,909 32,068,909 -- 9,851,486,302 9,829,256,297 22,230,005 41-94 Note: Preauthorization study costs chargeable to the MR&T authorization have been transferred to completed work. Costs not chargeable have been excluded from this report. MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-W COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 Mississippi River General investigations: and tributaries Allotted 5,828,000 5,623,000 4,380,000 5,382,000 115,909,381 (Regular Funds)' Cost 6,863,654 4,620,200 4,213,085 5,272,270 114,402,104 Construction (includes advance engineering and design): Allotted 190,229,000 182,069,000 185,028,000 160,418,300 6,372,917,262 Cost 237,686,164 176,998,170 166,435,626 170,984,427 6,355,052,544 Maintenance Allotted 131,195,000 119,742,000 140,966,000 130,411,700 3,104,394,555 Cost 139,023,101 120,281,489 136,931,961 132,269,594 3,101,156,545 Rehabilitations Allotted -- -- -- -- 31,113,000 Cost -- -- -- -- 31,113,000 Flood control emergencies (Maintenance): Allotted -- -- -- -- 14,885,992 Cost -- -- -- -- 14,885,992 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contributed 1,982,766 2,568,875 2,504,278 5,279,069 34,429,148 Cost 1,819,722 430,034 3,714,434 6,409,221 33,537,009 Maintenance Contributed 35,699 93,522 250,827 96,985 3,473,171 Cost 79,591 88,929 39,617 115,009 3,258,502 1. Appropriations were as follows: Appropriations chargeable against Flood Control Act authorizations: Flood Control, MR&T except for emergencies (excludes Maintenance allotments Aug. 18, 1941, through Sep. 30, 1998): Net total allotted for works under Mississippi River Commission: Eight-Year Program Funds, Construction General: Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 (not under MRC): Transferred to revolving fund: Impounded savings: Flood control emergencies: Net total allotted: Impounded savings: Additional funds not chargeable against Flood Control Act authorizations: Appropriations for Flood Control, MR&T, except for flood control emergencies: General investigations: Maintenance allotments Aug. 18, 1941, through Sep. 30, 1998 Appropriations in addition to appropriations for Flood Control, MR&T (itemized in footnote (1), pp. 2068-69, Annual Report for 1953): Budgetary and OCE Reserves: Grand total: $6,542,398,690 10,281,695 4,995,215 24,944,460 1,593,097 14,885,922 14,378 115,909,381 3,104,394,555 $6,584,213,157 14,900,300 3,220,303,936 32,068,909 9,851,486,302 41-95 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 41-W COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) Total Project Funding FY 98 Sep. 30, 1998 Reconciliation of appropriations and allotments: Total allotted to Sep. 30, 1998 Transferred to revolving fund: Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 (not under MRC): Impounded savings withdrawn by Chief of Engineers: 9,819,939,152 24,944,460 4,995,215 1,607,475 Total Appropriations to Sep. 30, 1998: 9,851,486,302 Appropriations for past four reporting periods were as follows: FY 95: $327,252,000 FY 97: $330,374,000 FY 96: $307,434,000 FY 98: $296,212,000 2. Totals for General Investigations include four projects transferred from Construction totals per DAEN-CWB-W, Aug. 4, 1978, teletype. 41-96 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-X MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3112) FISCAL YEAR COST Item and CWIS Number Federal Non-Federal Total SURVEYS (Category 110) Flood Damage Prevention (112) New Orleans District Morganza, LA to the Gulf of Mexico-012875 Subtotal Vicksburg District Mississippi Delta, MS-12803 Southeast Arkansas Feasibility - 12756 Subtotal Memphis District Reelfoot Lake, TN - 12394 Subtotal Total (Category 112) Flood Damage Prevention-Recon Study (113) New Orleans District Alexandria, LA to the Gulf of Mexico - 81308 Subtotal Memphis District Memphis Metro Area, TN & MS - 10461 Wolf River, Memphis, TN - 13157 Subtotal TOTAL (Category 113) TOTAL (Category 110) 1,013,410 1,013,410 19,037 84,597 103,634 402,978 402,978 342,341 1,355,751 342,341 1,355,751 19,037 103,634 242,811 645,789 242,811 645,789 1,520,022 585,152 2,105,174 39,144 39,144 39,144 39,144 635,585 635,585 486,306 28,567 514,873 1,121,891 28,567 1,150,458 1,161,035 28,567 1,189,602 2,681,057 613,719 3,294,776 41-97 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE 41-X MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES (Continued) ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3112) FISCAL YEAR COST Item and CWIS Number Federal Non-Federal Total COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 120) Vicksburg District - Surveys, Gages & Observations - 81900 Memphis District - Surveys, Gages & Observations - 81900 TOTAL (Category 120) CONTINUATION OF PLANNING & ENGINEERING (Category 140) Flood Control Projects (140) Memphis District Grand Prairie Region, AR - 81266 TOTAL (Category 140) PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING & DESIGN (Category 160) Flood Control Projects (162) Memphis District Bayou Metro Basin, AR - 81307 Grand Prairie Region, AR - 81266 St. Johns Bayou & New Madrid Fdwy-77005 Subtotal New Orleans District Louisiana Penitentiary Levee - 12087 Subtotal TOTAL (Category 160) GRAND TOTAL MR&T GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 224,237 395,331 308,156 224,237 359,331 308,156 998,331 727,438 4,015 1,729,784 193,940 193,940 1,923,724 5,272,268 998,331 727,438 4,0.15 1,729,784 193,940 193,940 1,923,724 613,719 5,885,987 41-98 U.S. ARMY CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING RESEARCH LABORATORIES RESOURCES AND CAPABILITIES The U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (CERL) serves the Corps, the Army, and the Nation with technical accomplishments in many areas dealing with the facility infrastructure and environmental quality problems that Army installations encounter. Today's Army races huge challenges in providing sustainable Civil Works structures. At CERL, we explore innovative ways to construct costeffective, modern structures that can be built, operated, and maintained with increased ease and reduced cost. The mission at CERL is primarily of a military construction and maintenance nature; however, many technologies have dual application and are of extreme value in the Civil Woirks arena. Our Civil Works efforts historically have been in the areas of corrosion control, high performance protective coatings (including removal of lead-based paint), management tools for O&M optimization, and environmental sustainment. CERL's people, their expertise, and the ability to draw upon multiple sources of talent have all fostered a climate in which research flourishes and success builds on success. CERL's professionals take great pride in contributing to the welfare of the Army and the Nation. EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES CERL has several million dollars' worth of test and evaluation equipment. The Triaxial Earthquake and Shake Simulator or "Shake Table" can simulate many vibrational environments, including earthquakes, and is the most powerful shaking table in the United States. The heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning test facility supports energy research. Our ion plater is a state-of-the-art physical vapor deposition capability that can also check the quality of shielded materials. A scanning electron microscope at CERL has 50 Angstroms resolution (400,000 times magnification) enabling research at the subparticle level. Other equipment supports the paint lab, welding lab, acoustics lab, environmental chemistry lab, plasma energy research lab, laser research facility, and bioengineering research lab. CERL also has access to the excellent research facilities at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign (UIUC), including those at the Hazardous and Toxic Waste Laboratory, the National Center for Supercomputing Applications, and many capabilities within the College of Engineering. CIVIL WORKS R&D PROGRAMS High Performance Materials and Systems Thermal Spray. In FY98, CERL concluded two significant research projects on the use of arc-spray for the application of thermal-sprayed coatings. These are the first studies ever conducted to determine the effect of the spray parameters on the quality of the applied coating. The work is of much interest to the thermal spray industry and has been used to update the existing Corps guide specification for thermal spray. (POC: ALFRED BEITELMAN) Environmentally Acceptable Lubricants. The Corps has many mechanical structures near or in environmentally sensitive waters. These structures usually require the use of lubricants and hydraulic fluids, which could potentially enter the water creating an environmental concern. Products are coming into the marketplace, which are designed to biodegrade in the environment. In FY98, CERL conducted a survey of the industry to determine the full range of available products that might be of value to the Corps. Corps installations were also surveyed to determine any experience (positive or negative) with these products. (POC: ALFRED BEITELMAN) Demonstration of New Coating Technologies. Expanding acquisition and environmental regulations as well as health/safety requirements place constraints on the types of coatings and application and surface preparation methods that may be used. In FY98, CERL conducted field demonstrations on both metallizing and new high performance coating systems, which, in addition to meeting the Corps unique operational needs, will meet tomorrow's pollution, health, and safety requirements. Results of these demonstrations are being placed on the Internet and will be used for updating guide specifications. Long term performance of previously applied coatings is being monitored to determine if product specifications should be developed for their procurement by the field. (POC: ALFRED BEITELMAN) Innovative Design and Construction of Navigation Projects Contracting Methods for Innovative Design and Construction of Navigation Projects. The Corps of Engineers is developing innovative technologies and construction methods for building new navigation structures and upgrading existing facilities. Using new technologies, however, increases the risk to the 42 - 1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 designer, constructor, and ultimately the owner. The Corps' traditional bidding practices are driven by lowest cost. This approach precludes contractors whose special skills or qualifications necessitate higher bids. Successful use of innovative construction technologies requires a departure from the traditional low-bid approach. Project delivery methods must be identified that mitigate problems with contractor qualifications, risk, cost and schedule growth, and other critical issues involved with innovative technologies. In FY98, CERL developed project delivery guidance for innovation navigation structures. This guidance is based on identifying obstacles to innovation encountered within the construction industry, and evaluating industry best practices to avoid or mitigate obstacles. Recommendations address strategic project planning, constructability, contractor qualifications, contractor selection procedures, and contract administration. (POC: THOMAS NAPIER) Geographic Information Systems Managing land and water resources has become an increasingly difficult and challenging task as Federal land and water resource managers have faced many new legislative requirements. These project managers often need to incorporate inputs from increasingly sophisticated and often conflicting interest groups and demands to accurately project and evaluate the costs, benefits, options, and potential short term, long term, and cumulative consequences of any proposed management actions. Current and emerging technologies (e.g., Geographic Information Systems [GIS], remote sensing, landscape process modeling and simulation, etc.) offer many capabilities to assist managers in addressing these difficult demands; however, they currently are disconnected pieces that need to be blended together into an integrated framework. The Land Management Systems (LMS) is an initiative addressing both Corps Military Program and Civil Works missions and is intended to design, develop, support, and apply an integrated capability for modeling and decision support technologies for applications relevant to the management of Department of Defense lands, seas, and airspace. (POC: WILLIAM GORAN) Modeling Catalog. Adaptive land management seeks to achieve and dynamically adapt goals and objectives for management of land, water, and air resources. A web-based catalog was developed by a team of researchers from CERL and the Cold Regions Research Engineering Laboratory that offers on-line access, browse, query, and output capabilities to support decision making and planning for integrated resources and land management for sustainment. The emphasis of Version 2.0 of the catalog is to support the Civil Works Program. Some of the computer-based technologies compiled in this version include, predictive computer models, simulation technologies, computer applications built upon a GIS background and decision support systems that will be tools for decision-making and planning. (POC: KIM MAJERUS) Management of Support of USACE Metadata Program. CERL support to the management of USACE Metadata supports Executive Order 12906, Engineering Regulation 110-1-8156, Engineer Manual 1110-1-2909, and Engineer Circular 1130-2- 206 related to the documentation, distribution, and access of Federally-funded project data. In FY98, the project team redesigned and implemented an Oracle Clearinghouse Node. Metadata implementation workshops were conducted at three locations supporting six districts and two divisions. (POC: KELLY DILKS) Geospatial Data Management Infrastructure: Guidance to Managing UACE Data. The objective of this research project is to develop approaches to managing USACE Geospatial data that are flexible enough to allow for individual implementations, yet rigid enough to assure compliance with management requirements. In FY98, a draft report on data management was completed and disseminated via the Internet. Two prototypes were tested; one at Mississippi Valley District related to a common database schema and one at Jacksonville District related to data manager concept. (POC: KELLY DILKS) Enterprise Integration of CADD/GIS. Commercial off-the-shelf software systems (COTS) are beginning to provide a generalized way of accessing and storing computer-aided design (CAD), GIS, and management information systems (MIS) data. The purpose of this research is to analyze these integration capabilities and civil works applications with respect to enterprise-wide integration. The project will assemble and test a software environment for integration and implement demonstration applications for evaluation purposes. It also will propose an information architecture (data content model) and information management plan for civil works to capitalize on the integration capabilities of COTS in relation to evolving standards. As an enabling technology and common data model, it will provide the capability to manage and 42-2 U.S. ARMY CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING RESEARCH LABORATORIES use Corps data in an integrated manner, and facilitate data interaction with external business partners. The initial integration environment has been defined and an integrated data model proposed. (POC: FRANCOIS GROBLER) Repair, Evaluation, Rehabilitation Program Maintenance and Repair, Evaluation, Maintenance, and Rehabilitation (REMR) Management Systems for CW Structures CERL has developed Repair, Evaluation, Maintenance, and Rehabilitation (REMR) Management Systems for most types of Civil Works structures maintained by the Corps. REMR Management Systems are designed to be decision-support tools for determining when, where, and how to effectively allocate M&R dollars for Civil Works structures. They provide objective condition assessment procedures, a means for comparing the condition of facilities over time, and software for managing and analyzing facility data. These systems have been endorsed by Corps HQ (Operations, Readiness, and Construction) for use at all Corps Districts and Divisions. The products from the REMR Management System are: (1) a standardized inspection method; (2) a rating system for quantifying facility condition (and performance for coastal structures); (3) algorithms for taking individual defect or sub-component ratings, and from them, computing a condition index for a whole structure or major component; (4) software for storing and maintaining facility inventory and inspection data, performing condition (and function for coastal structures) index calculations; and (5) initial training of USACE personnel in use of the system. The REMR Management Systems for Embankment Dams was further developed in FY98. The condition index was modified in a final development meeting. Windows-based software was created and limited District training was held. A draft technical report documenting the procedures was written. A preliminary condition index procedure for Coastal Non-Rubble Breakwaters and Jetties also has been developed. In closely related work, Huntington District, Wilmington District, and Louisville District funded workshops to demonstrate the procedure for a District Dam and to train District personnel in the use of the procedure. (POC: STUART FOLTZ) The REMR Management system for lock and dam Operating Equipment was completed in FY98. This system includes the assemblies comprising the power train connecting a motor to nearly any type of gate or valve (e.g., miter, sector, roller, tainter). Assemblies include exposed gears, enclosed gears, couplings, gear racks, sector gears, strut arms, rocker arms, hydraulic cylinders, chains, and cable. (POC: DAVID MCKAY) Training sessions for Condition Index (CI) inspection of miter gates, operating equipment, and lock and dam concrete were conducted for Rock Island and St. Paul Districts. Participants from other Districts also attended. (POC: DAVID MCKAY) Civil Works - Regulatory Regulatory Analysis and Management System (RAMS) II Planning Document. The regulatory division of the Corps of Engineers processes about 13,000 permits annually for water-related activities under its authority. The input, management, analysis, and reporting of regulatory data have traditionally been carried out with district-unique software and database designs. These disparate systems have resulted in high corporate costs for system development, procurement, training, and support, as well as a reduction in the reliability and accuracy of upward data reporting. An updated corporate automated information system (AIS) for regulatory activities, called the Regulatory Analysis and Management System (RAMS II), has been developed and tested at nine districts. RAMS II addresses deficiencies with district-specific systems by standardizing and normalizing the database structure and porting the system to compliant software within Army Technical Architecture (ATA) guidelines. CERL has produced required Life Cycle Management of Information Systems (LCMIS) planning documents for RAMS II through the testing and evaluation phase. LCMIS documentation will allow HQUSACE to request approval for deployment of RAMS II at a Corps Major Automated Information System Review Council (CMAISRC) in FY98. CERL developed and managed a national maintenance contract for CORPS-wide regulatory branches in FY97. In FY98, CERL was the technical manager for instituting software changes to the RAMS and RAMS II programs in order to account for changes in national data collection and reporting requirements. (POC: PAUL LOECHL) CIVIL WORKS O&M MANAGEMENT Improved Operations & Maintenance Budgeting Environment. Over the past 4 years, work has been ongoing to improve the process by which the project, District, and Division offices submit and track their O&M budgets. Due to a shrinking workforce, the work of submitting and tracking the O&M budget began spanning multiple organizations in the District 42- 3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 offices. Project office staff often became involved directly with inputting data into the system instead of District office personnel, and District offices became the error checkers and approvers. Because of these requirements to have more and more people involved in the O&M budget submission process, the budgeting environment was expanded to allow all levels access simultaneously in a multi-user LAN version of the Windows Automated Budget System (Win ABS). Improvements were made in the ability for multiple users to connect to the system. In addition, a cycle archiving function was added to allow management of the large amounts of data in the system. (POC: LAURA HARMET) TECHNICAL/FIELD SUPPORT TO CW Paint Technology Center. The CERL Paint Technology Center responded to over 500 calls for assistance to the Army and Corps of Engineers on topics such as paint failures, corrective actions, and legal actions related to paint performance. The center tested over 150 paint samples for specification compliance. The center is recognized for its specialized expertise in high performance paint coatings for submersible steel. (POC: ALFRED BEITELMAN) Lubrication Manual. In FY98, CERL completed work on an engineering manual on lubrication. The manual was developed to act as a single 'first source' for information on lubrication for Corps engineering and operations personnel. The manual has both basic information on lubrication principles and products as well as specific information on the lubrication of specific Corps of Engineers equipment. Publication of the manual allows the cancellation of several previous engineering letters and notes. Work on this manual was conducted in cooperation with the Bureau of Reclamation. The Bureau will use the same manual for their work. (POC: ALFRED BEITELMAN) ERGO State Supplements. The Corps of Engineers conducts environmental assessments at its sites, facilities, and outgrants. These assessments assure compliance with Federal, state, and engineering regulations through the use of TEAM and Environmental Review Guide for Operations (ERGO) assessment tools developed by CERL. The State Supplements to TEAM are updated annually to reflect the most recent state regulations. (POC: CAROLYN O'ROURKE) Welding and Failure Analyses. CERL provided metallurgical welding and failure analysis support to the field by analyzing a broken shaft for Little Rock District, providing welding engineering support for the fabrication of the hydraulic cylinder frame support at the Huntington District, and by providing welding engineering support to the New Orleans District for the dewatering needles being fabricated by a contractor. (POC: ROBERT WEBER) Review of Stainless Steel Tank Repair at Bofors (Detroit District). Welding assistance on the 316L stainless steel tank was provided to the Bofors-Nobel Superfund Site at Muskegon, MI, in January 1998. The tank was inspected to determine the extent of the necessary repairs. Inside seams of the tank were welded with two beads that, when completed, doubled the leg size of the original weld. Pinholes left by the first weld were covered. Pipe penetrations were reinforced with weld bead all around the inside of the tank. Final areas were repaired with external stiffeners. (POC: ROBERT WEBER) Demo of Low Temperature Pipe Embrittlement Process (Huntington District). A low temperature steel pipe embrittlement process using 6-, 16-, and 24-inch diameter schedule 80 carbon steel pipe to aid in pipe cutting was demonstrated using dry ice and liquid nitrogen temperatures. A plumbers cast iron cutting tool was used for cutting the pipes. This demonstration was in support of an interagency agreement between the Department of Energy's Federal Energy Technology Center and the Huntington District with technical assistance from the Seattle District. (POC: ROBERT WEBER) Examination of Extraction Well Piping (Pittsburgh District). A field trip to the Lipari Landfill, Glassboro, NJ, was conducted to examine a leaking carbon steel pipe, take boroscope inspections, and thickness measurements using ultrasonic thickness gages. Pipe sections were returned from the field and metallurgically examined in the laboratory. The external surface of the pipe had been subjected to general corrosion attack. Also, pitting corrosion to a depth of 10% of the wall thickness was found. Based on these analyses, recommendations were made to replace pipe sections near welds, as galvanic corrosion had severely reduced the wall thickness. The use of insulating couplings to mitigate galvanic coupling, and internal cleaning and in situ coating or lining of the existing sections of the pipe was recommended. (POC: ROBERT WEBER) 42 -4 U.S. ARMY COLD REGIONS RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING LABORATORY BACKGROUND The U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL), in Hanover, New Hampshire, maintains the finest research and engineering staff and facilities in the world for the study of cold regions science and technology. CRREL's experience spans 50 years, starting with the Boston District's Soils Laboratory work on frozen soils in the early 1940s. The creation of CRREL began in 1961 with the merger of the Arctic Construction and Frost Effects Laboratory and the Snow, Ice, and Permafrost Research Establishment, both of which were outgrowths of the Army's World War II experience in Alaska, Iceland, and Greenland. This merger put the Department of Defense's principal cold regions expertise in one place. The early 1970's were the beginnings of a long-term program headed by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to investigate ways of extending navigation on the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway throughout the winter and also the beginnings of Civil Works research at CRREL. As part of this Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway Winter Navigation Demonstration Program, which began in 1971, CRREL researchers investigated ice booms to impede the flow of ice into navigation channels. CRREL later developed various methods of keeping waterway locks ice-free, including the use of chemical coatings, saws for cutting ice from lock walls, and bubblers for preventing ice formation. CIVIL WORKS RESEARCH FACILITIES CRREL's Ice Engineering Research Facility (IERF) is one of the largest refrigerated hydraulic laboratories in the world. The 73,000-square-foot facility has three special purpose research areas: a large low-temperature towing tank, a 100-foot-long refrigerated flume for modeling rivers, and a large hydraulic model room for studying ice effects on civil works facilities, primarily locks and dams. Additionally, the facility houses a snowdrifting wind tunnel for simulating snowdrift accumulation, icing, and snow transport. The IERF supports research on winter navigation, ice structure interactions, ice jam flooding, and performance of surface vessels and submarines in ice. The USACE Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems Center (RS/GISC) is located at CRREL. The RS/GISC is the principal catalyst for the evolution and application of emerging remote sensing and geographic information systems technologies in execution of the Corps' civil works water, natural resources, emergency management, and environmental missions. The RS/GISC manages the Corps' remote sensing research and development programs, emergency management RS/GIS support, and RS/GIS activities in the Corps' Water Control Data System (WCDS) Software Modernization Program. The RS/GISC also acts as the principal technology assistance hub for new applications of RS/GIS technologies for the Corps district offices across the nation. CIVIL WORKS RESEARCH PROGRAMS The major Civil Works research programs at CRREL are Cold Regions Engineering, and Remote Sensing/ Geographic Information Systems. The following is a summary of each program and a list of accomplishments for FY98. Cold Regions Engineering Program The Cold Regions Engineering Program addresses four major areas: 1) impact of ice on inland navigation and the operation and maintenance of USACE structures, 2) severe ice jams and related floods, 3) ice hydraulics and ice damage to shorelines and shore structures, and 4) hydrology and water resources of cold regions. The program develops an understanding of river and lake ice processes, assesses the impacts of ice on river hydraulics, accurately defines problems due to the formation, evolution, and transport of river ice, and develops solutions and mitigation methods. The program also develops numerical runoff models to more accurately predict snowmelt and consequent runoff, as well as computer simulations of river ice 43-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY98 transport to determine impact loads on riverine structures and bank protection projects. Accomplishments: * CRREL's expertise is in constant demand during winter emergencies, evidenced by numerous calls for ice-related assistance every year (76 in FY 98) from county, state, and federal agency personnel, and the private sectors. The requests range from questions on ice safety for recreational activity or working on lake ice sheets to protecting banks and properties from ice damage. * Applications of a three-dimensional discrete element model coupled with a one-dimensional depth-averaged unsteady hydraulic model were extended to simulate the interaction between an ice boom and floating ice. Possible applications include ice control on the lower Missouri River, and between brash ice and a tow entering a lock approach, allowing calculation of ice forces on guide walls. * An in-depth state-of-the-art review of nonstructural ice control methods in rivers and lakes was published to include conditions of application, cost comparison, and case studies. The review will be used by Corps Districts and State agencies to minimize navigation problems and ice jam damages. * An initial statistical empirical ice jam prediction model was developed that incorporates a discriminant function analysis and risk prediction and was applied to the Oil Creek/Allegheny River Confluence. * Techniques for USACE and Army snowmelt prediction were improved through development of spatially distributed snowmelt techniques and the use of O-18 isotope sampling to determine the surface and ground components of streamflow hydrographs. The distributed snowmelt technique, validated at the Sleeper's River Research Watershed, segments a drainage basin into clear-sky radiation regions and calculates snowmelt with an energy balance approach. Work is underway to adapt the distributed technique to a simplified melt factor approach. * Based on the development of low-cost ice control structures, a model study of an ice jam control structure in Cazenovia Creek, near West Seneca, New York, is being performed for the Buffalo Engineer District. The cost of the proposed structure is expected to be only 25% of a traditional ice control structure. * CRREL assisted in the design of an ice and debris boom that was installed at the entrance of the lock-filling canal at the R.C. Byrd Lock and Dam. The design and construction costs of this boom were $390K, a saving of 60% over that of a conventional structure of about $1M. * At the request of Corps Districts and other Federal or state agencies, CRREL research engineers presented four Workshops on emergency response to ice jams, advanced mitigation methods, and longterm/ permanent ice jam control methods. Personnel from Corps Districts, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the National Weather Service, and state and local emergency management agencies attended these workshops. Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems Programs Based in the RSGISC, our Remote Sensing (RS) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) research programs supported the Army's civil works mission by improving methods for acquisition, image processing, and management of geospatial data. The GIS program was initiated in FY 98 to address the integration of geospatial work across all civil works R&D program areas, integration of all geospatial data (data from GIS, remote sensing, survey and mapping, and CADD), and enterprise integration of geospatial data. One of the work units is closely tied to an additional integration effort, the integration of models used for land management, an issue applicable to both civil works land management and the management of lands on military bases. Accomplishments: * Emergency management support activities were significant in 1998, starting with preparation for changes in weather patterns caused by a strong El Nino event. Weekly weather reports were coordinated, including temperature and precipitation anomalies prepared by the Topographic Engineering Center, daily wave forecasts for the West Coast prepared by the Waterways Experiment Station (WES), and development of improved snowmelt forecasting in California developed jointly by CRREL and WES. We also were involved with support for the unusual hurricane season, during 43-2 U.S. ARMY COLD REGIONS RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING LABORATORY which, for the first time this century, four hurricanes were present in the Atlantic at the same time. Daily mission tracking maps were developed for Puerto Rico following Hurricane Georges, in response to requests from the Assistant Team leader at the Disaster Field Office in San Juan and the ice and water mission action officer. * CorpsView, software developed for the analysis and visualization of reservoir storage, snowcover mapping, and flood damage assessment, is now installed in 20 of the USACE districts and divisions. * An example of significant cost savings from technologies developed was demonstrated this year. By using our remote sensing techniques to calculate reservoir storage using LANDSAT imagery, the Los Angeles Engineer District saved $600,000 in just one application, at the Painted Rock Reservoir. * Snow mapping techniques have been implemented operationally by several districts, for the USACE in the nationwide Water Control Data System Modernization program, and to emergency managers through the ENGLINK Internet mapping system. Based on previous pilot studies and tests over Bosnia and California, CRREL has moved forward to incorporate snow mapping into CorpsView, a data display, analysis, and modeling system developed to exploit data sources available to Corps District offices. Initial implementation supports the Sacramento District and Southern Pacific Division, USACE. Continuing development of design studies for past water years will aid forecasting and analysis for water control using spatial data. * PROSPECT training courses in remote sensing and GIS were conducted in FY98. More than 100 students were taught in four sessions. Response to the instruction has been so positive that the PROSPECT program has approved development of an intermediate GIS class for 1999, also to be taught at CRREL. 43-3 U.S. ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION RESOURCES AND CAPABILITIES Background The U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station (WES) has served the Corps, the Army, and the Nation with technical accomplishments in a variety of engineering and scientific fields for nearly 70 years. From its beginning in 1929 as a small hydraulics laboratory established to assist in developing a comprehensive plan for flood control of the Mississippi River, WES has grown into a 273-hectare complex of five centrally managed laboratories that is the largest and most diverse civil and environmental research and development organization in the world. During FY98, WES had 1246 employees of which 649 were highly trained engineers and scientists. This professional staff comprised 202 Ph.D.'s, 270 Masters' degrees, and 177 Bachelor's degrees. WES executed a Civil Works program totaling $89 million; of this total $40 million was executed in direct allotted R&D Programs. The remaining $53 million was executed in support of USACE District and Division offices and non-Corps customers. Major non-Corps customers included the Department of Transportation and the Environmental Protection Agency. During FY98, WES published 407 technical documents in-house including 151 Technical Reports, 21 Miscellaneous Papers, 10 Contract Reports, 2 Instruction Reports, and 124 special purpose documents. In addition to these documents, 21 Information Exchange Bulletins on technical subjects were produced. WES engineers and scientists also published 87 technical articles in refereed journals and 166 technical papers in conference proceedings and other journals. LABORATORIES The diverse civil engineering and environmental quality research and development organization is a complex of five centrally managed laboratories with world-renowned expertise and facilities for solving a wide range of civil engineering and environmental quality challenges. Each laboratory adds a unique perspective and set of capabilities to the overall WES team. Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory The Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory was formed in 1996 by merging the Coastal Engineering Research Center (CERC) and the Hydraulics Laboratory. The Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory is the Nation's center for engineering and scientific research and development in the coastal zone, hydraulics, and hydrosciences. Nationally and internationally recognized experts in the fields of riprap design, navigation engineering, pump station design, fisheries engineering, sediment transport, estuarine engineering, dredging equipment, hydrodynamics, groundwater modeling, coastal flood and storm protection, navigation maintenance, harbor design and modification, coastal and hydraulic structures, physical processes associated with water resources environmental problems, military logistics-over-the-shore, wave climatology, and watershed modeling. Geotechnical Laboratory The flood control R&D work of the Hydraulics Laboratory led almost immediately to the need for soils research and prediction of the behavior of structures built on and/or with soil materials. Therefore, the Geotechnical Laboratory was established in 1931. 44-1 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY98 The thrust of geotechnical engineering involves investigation, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of structures with, on, or in earth materials. Research addresses problems in areas such as soil and rock mechanics, foundation behavior, tunneling and trenchless technology, engineering geology, engineering seismology, engineering geophysics, earthquake engineering, pavement technology, mobility analysis and modeling, and trafficability studies. Structures Laboratory The Corps' Concrete Laboratory was transferred from Mt. Vernon, NY to WES in 1946. In 1983, WES combined the Concrete Laboratory and the Weapons Effects Laboratory into the current Structures Laboratory. Sole Federal responsibility for sampling, inspecting, and acceptance testing of Portland cement and pozzolan rest with the Structures Laboratory. It is a world leader in research on concrete materials and construction techniques, and the evaluation, maintenance, and rehabilitation of civil works concrete structures. Other areas of expertise include phenomenology and effects of explosions, dynamic properties of soil and rock masses, and response of structures to a wide assortment of loading conditions, including seismic, penetration, and blast effects. Environmental Laboratory The Environmental Laboratory is the acknowledged leader for conducting environmental quality research and problem solution involving the consequences of water resources development, navigation, regulation of wetlands and inland and oceanic water quality, management of natural and cultural resources, and cleanup of contaminated groundwater sediments and soils. For over 25 years, an interdisciplinary staff of peer-recognized professionals, augmented with the finest network of academic and private scientists and engineers in the country, have provided the environmental quality technology necessary to further the Corps' missions. Notable examples of recent accomplishments include wetlands research in support of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act; natural resource management to guide Corps stewardship at projects; research to accelerate growth of desirable, non-problem vegetation; distribution of the first-ever expert system/information manual on using biological control agents to manage nuisance aquatic plants; and providing guidance to the field on controlling zebra mussel infestations using antifoulant coatings (paints, thermal metal sprays, etc.), and continuous backwash filter systems for intakes that supply irrigation systems, water supply, and other low-flow requirements. Information Technology Laboratory The Information Technology Laboratory (ITL) was established at WES in 1986 to provide research, development, testing, evaluation, and services for the Corps in information technology, computer-aided engineering, and computer science areas. ITL provides WES, the Corps, Army, and DoD with a variety of advanced information technology capabilities and expertise. ITL manages the first High Performance Computing Major Shared Resource Center to be formed under the auspices of the DoD High Performance Computing Modernization Program; the Tri-Service CADD/GIS Technology Center; the Corps' Civil Works Guidance Update Program; one of two CEAP Regional Processing Centers providing 60 percent of the Corps' MIS data processing; one of the largest highbandwidth, high-speed data communication networks in the world; the largest library in the Corps which is also one of the finest civil engineering libraries in the Federal 44-2 Government; and the largest publishing and visual information facility in the Corps. ITL has recognized expertise in the areas of high-performance computing, application of CADD and GIS technologies to Army Civil Works projects and for installation facility management, computer-aided interdisciplinary engineering and analysis, computer science applications, software engineering, large relational database systems, high-speed communications, and scientific visualization. This expertise is applied to address problems in design, analysis, and management of projects and facilities to support the various missions of the Corps. ARMY CIVIL WORKS R&D PROGRAMS Army Civil Works research and development efforts at WES cover virtually the entire spectrum of technology and problem areas in the Army's Civil Works arena: Ecosystem Management and Restoration Research Program (EMRRP) In FY 98, the Environmental Impact Research Program (EIRP) was refocused as the EMRRP. The EMRRP addresses environmental impact problems from Corps water resource development activities and projects. The objective of the EMRRP is to provide state-of-the-science methods and procedures to predict and analyze environmental impacts with application toward ecosystem management and restoration. Ecosystem is defined by regulation as the dynamic and interrelating complex of plant and animal communities and their associated nonliving environment. The EMRRP is organized into the following five technology development areas: a. Investigate Basic Ecosystem Processes. b. Develop Capabilities to Predict Ecosystem Impacts. c. Develop Rapid Quantification and Assessment Methods. d. Restore Species Habitats of Concern. e. Develop Ecosystem Management and Decision-Support Systems. The work effort on guidelines for evaluating the use of vegetation in flood control channels was completed. This technology provides Corps managers with the tools needed to evaluate vegetation in and along flood channels to maximize stream/river vegetative habitat and minimize adverse hydraulic effects. Analytical techniques were developed to predict the roughness and stability characteristics of different plant species that have high environmental value and will reduce project mitigation and O&M costs associated with vegetation management. RESOURCES MANAGEMENT MANUAL. FY 98 work emphasized new and improved techniques for managing moist soil units (wildlife and waterfowl habitat); prescribed burning management techniques for wetland areas; and greenway or greenbelt corridot management. This national and international landmark manual continues the Corps' technical and scientific leadership in the Federal resource agency community. Characterization and Restoration of Wetlands Research Program WES has conducted wetlands research for over 20 years and is the Nation's leader in wetlands delineation, evaluation, and restoration research and development. Through the WES Wetlands Research and Development Center, wetlands research provides innovative, cost-effective, field-applicable guidance to the Corps, DoD, other Federal agencies, state and local agencies, and the private sector. Much of this guidance has direct application to regulatory and land management activities performed on military installations. In addition to publishing "how-to" documents, the program provides regional training courses to all Corps and DoD users. Major research studies, including the Cache River study in Arkansas, have been conducted to determine how wetlands function as an ecosystem. For nearly 10 years, physical, chemical, and biological data have been collected at this site in an effort to develop assessment techniques and 44-3 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY98 models to accurately predict changes that occur in wetlands over time and the impacts that occur as a result of human activities. These data and others have been used to develop a model for evaluating the functions of riverine wetlands. The model was developed using a state-of-the-art wetlands functional assessment approach called the hydrogeomorphic (HGM) approach that was developed by WES. Regional HGM guidance for additional wetland types (depressions, fringes, and slopes) is also being developed. The HGM procedure for wetlands functional evaluation has been endorsed by the Administration for use by all Federal regulatory agencies. Wetlands Demonstration Projects were conducted at 43 sites throughout the United States to field test state-of-the-art technologies for applicability to the Corps' regulatory needs. These projects contributed valuable knowledge and technical information in the form of guidance documents related to the design/construction of restored and created wetlands and the management and enhancement of existing wetlands. An engineering guidance document that summarizes much of this research ("Handbook on Wetlands Technology; Engineering for Wetlands Restoration and Creation") has been produced. Corps division and district offices are able to obtain direct technical support from WES research scientists and engineers through the Wetlands Regulatory Assistance Program (WRAP). Many of these requests result from a need for technical assistance in the field application of newly developed techniques/procedures for wetlands characterization, restoration, creation, and management. WES scientists also act as an unbiased third party to assist in the resolution of complex wetlands permitting decisions where litigation may or may not be involved. Zebra Mussel Research Program (ZMRP) The ZMRP is the only Federally authorized R&D program for the development of technology for zebra mussel control. The focus is to develop environmentally sound control methods for use in and around public facilities. The zebra mussel has spread throughout the eastern half of the United States and threatens the rivers and water supply systems of western states. More than $100 million is spent annually to prevent catastrophic shutdown of public facilities in the east and central United States; the cost could increase to over $0.5 billion annually by the year 2000. More costeffective and environmentally sensitive methods are required to control this problem. Research areas include: developing antifoulant coatings and filter systems; using thermal shock, dessication, and freezing; developing environmentally compatible biocides; and using microorganisms for biological control. The ZMRP is coordinated with the research programs of other Federal, regional and state agencies, and private industry through the Zebra Mussel Coordination Committee, established under the Aquatic Nuisance Species Program. Successes include completion of a 5-year evaluation of coatings and materials to prevent zebra mussel attachment. Published results will present significant savings to power plants, the boating industry, and Corps facilities. In addition, the most widely used means of nonchemical control (thermal shock, desiccation, and freezing) were directly derived from the ZMRP research efforts on physiological factors affecting the control of zebra mussels. The ZMRP is transferring this technology through a CD-ROM information system (updated yearly) and an engineering handbook for facility managers and operators of locks and dams, water supply and treatment facilities, power plants, and vessels. The CD 44-4 and handbook help managers and operators determine the vulnerability of their facility and outline control options. As the zebra mussel continues to expand its range in the United States, the audience for the ZMRP Technical Notes increases. At present, approximately 2,500 individuals are included on the ZMRP mailing list. Aquatic Plant Control Research Program (APCRP) The APCRP is the Nation's leader in aquatic plant research and technology for managing problem aquatic plant infestations of major economic significance in public and navigable waters. APCRP provides environmentally compatible, costeffective methods for identifying, assessing, and managing aquatic plants. Through direct application of APCRP-developed technology, researchers have successfully reduced the levels of two problem emergent species (alligatorweed and water hyacinth) to maintenance levels throughout the United States. Currently, major research efforts are focused on technology to manage two problem submersed aquatic plants species (hydrilla and Eurasian watermilfoil) that infest waters in 43 states. In FY98, APCRP developed and distributed more than 5,000 CD-ROM copies of the Aquatic Plant Management Information System (APIS) to the Corps, other Federal and state agencies, and the private sector. APIS provides information on the identification and management of over 60 species of native and nonindigenous aquatic and wetland plant species. In addition, innovative biological agents were used to control hydrilla at an annual cost savings of $2 - $3 million for seven Corps Districts. A novel biological formulation was developed in partnership with industry for controlling hydrilla at an added annual cost savings of $1 - $2 million. This biological formulation also reduced stress to the environment by reducing the amount of herbicides necessary to achieve control of hydrilla. An Endothall herbicide polymer was formulated that significantly reduces human health hazards associated with incidental exposure and concentrates effects in a closely defined area for maximum control at minimum cost. Throughout FY98, the APCRP continued research efforts on acquiring information on the growth and ecological requirements of problem aquatic plants, and on producing new ecologically based, biological, chemical, and integrated technologies for their management. Specific information on the biology and ecology of problem aquatic plants, obtained through research in the APCRP, has greatly improved the efficacy and diversity of management options, while minimizing adverse effects on the environment. Innovative technologies are being developed to prevent the initial introduction and spread of nonindigenous aquatic plant species, and to replace problem aquatic plants with native species, providing muchimproved aquatic habitat for fish and wildlife. These new technologies will be a significant asset in implementing clean water initiatives by restoring aquatic systems harmed by non-indigenous aquatic plant species. Resources Research Program (RRP) The RRP supports Corps missions relating to recreation resources management by developing research products that provide cost-effective solutions to problems faced by resource managers. The RRP continues development and implementation of customer card survey instruments allowing project personnel to compare and adjust basic recreation services in accordance with national trends and to meet GPRA and related performance measures. The RRP is also evaluating the economic impacts of marina slip renters and boat dock owners on Corps water resource projects. This work provides the capability to assess economic implications of management actions affecting these user 44-5 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY98 communities, and to consider this information in natural resources management decisions. Information is being developed regarding ethnic use and recreation needs of Corps projects for use in project planning and operations. This will lead to a better understanding of the diverse recreation needs and preferences of major ethnic user groups, and more informed decision making as regards visitor information programs and facility improvements and rehabilitation. In FY98, customer survey results were evaluated on ten Corps projects, providing a field-test and validation of methodologies for project personnel to use in improving delivery of recreation services based on customer input. A national survey was developed to evaluate economic impacts of marina slip renters. This information will be used to evaluate the economic implications of management actions that affect marina slip renters. Evaluations were completed on Corps project use and preferences of Native and African Americans. Asian and Hispanic communities are also being addressed. Water Quality Research Program (WQRP) The WQRP conducts research for solving water quality problems on all Corps inland reservoir and waterway projects. The WQRP provides costeffective methods, applications, and guidance for problems related to managing project water quality. In FY98, the WQRP released a contaminant transport/fate model (CEQUAL- ICM/TOXI) that provides the Corps with the capability to determine the impact of various projects on contaminant concentrations and to evaluate various options for costeffectively managing areas that receive or contain contaminants. This model will provide a sound basis from which to resolve conflicts arising from contaminant issues. In addition, improved analytical techniques were developed for measuring nutrients and other chemicals in reservoir tailwaters. These techniques will assist in the decision making process necessary for better management of reservoir tailwater quality. The WQRP continued research efforts to develop technologies for improved water quality, ensuring that the Corps becomes an effective and equal partner with other Federal agencies in total watershed management. Research continued on the development of a comprehensive watershed modeling system. This system will greatly increase the efficiency of Corps Districts to plan, design, operate, and maintain water resource projects, with attention (for the first time) to the influences of offsite land use. This capability supports current National attention on watershed issues and basinwide approaches to environmental restoration and management. Water Operations Technical Support (WOTS) Program The WOTS Program provides comprehensive and interdisciplinary technology transfer and technology application to all Corps water resource projects. WOTS is managed to maximize cost-effectiveness, and ensure broad dissemination and implementation of technology and information. The program provides effective environmental and water quality engineering technology to address a wide range of water resource management problems at Corps reservoir and waterway projects, and in the river systems affected by project operations nationwide. In addition, WOTS provides technology to address problems occurring from the presence of zebra mussels and other non-indigenous aquatic species, tailwater fisheries at pump-back hydropower projects, water quality impacts of shoreline erosion control and reservoir sedimentation, and other project operations related to environmental 44-6 and water quality issues. WOTS provides technical support to the Corps' mission- related project responsibilities, with special emphasis on the transfer of technology. The program ensures that the technologies developed by the Corps and other Federal agencies are current and readily available to all Corps field offices. The effective use of technologies is secured through field demonstrations, speciality workshops, publication of information bulletins, technical notes, executive notes, technical reports, miscellaneous papers, instruction reports, videos, meetings, seminars, briefings at field offices, congressional testimony, and the Internet. Since its inception, WOTS has provided environmental and water quality technological solutions to over 1,000 problems identified at projects from every Corps District. The program annually publishes and distributes nearly 10,000 copies of manuals, bulletins, notes, and reports. WOTS annually conducts speciality workshops, training personnel on the latest environmental and water quality management techniques. Recently, the WOTS Online Institute was developed to provide inexpensive, convenient access by the field to water quality monitoring training on the Internet. Long-Term Effects of Dredging Operations (LEDO) Program The LEDO Program provides new or improved technology to predict longterm environmental impacts and to identify, assess, and manage contaminated sediments. The technology allows the Corps to meet its dredging constraints and environmental compliance in a manner that is technically sound while reducing or eliminating unneeded constraints. The program research supports a "risk-based" approach in managing contaminated sediments. The basic risk approach encompasses: 1) effects assessment, including chronic/sublethal toxicity and genotoxicity; 2) exposure assessment, including bioaccumulation of toxics, volatile contaminant loss, and surface runoff contaminant losses; 3) risk characterization, including interpretive guidance for toxicological testing; and 4) risk management, including contaminant control and long-term site evaluation and assessment of disposal alternatives. LEDO implementation tools and techniques include the Technical Assistance Program (DOTS), the Dredged Material Management and Assessment training effort of the DOTS Program; Technical Notes and lecture material suitable for training; EPA/Corps regulatory manuals; detailed guidance documents; and an interactive World Wide Web site. The program will continue to upgrade and support a national bioaccumulation database to make certain that contaminated sediment information is available to a broad audience. As designed, the program continues to have direct programmatic input to the development of the EPA/Corps Testing Manuals for dredged material. Dredging Operations Technical Support (DOTS) Program The DOTS Program provides comprehensive and interdisciplinary technology transfer/technology application to all Corps navigation dredging projects. DOTS is managed from a centralized program to maximize cost-effectiveness and implement National policies and laws on a consistent basis. The program provides direct technical support on a project-reimbursable basis to all Corps elements involved in maintaining navigation projects. DOTS focuses on applying technology and research results to field problems. Emerging scientific approaches to testing dredged material and constant changes in regulation of these programs cause uncertainty in administering the Corps dredging program. The major features of the program include: training Corps staff on the latest environmental and engineering techniques associated with dredging and dredged material disposal and with water quality and related aquatic environmental issues; 44-7 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY98 technology transfer of new and emerging techniques used to determine compliance with environmental protection statutes regarding the management of dredged material; transfer of technology developed by others that deal with the treatment and decontamination of highly contaminated sediments; and applying and transferring innovative riskbased technologies that identify, assess, and manage sediments contaminated with high profile chemicals such as dioxin, polyaromatic hydrocarbons, and polychlorinated biphenols. Technology is presented in the form of field-ready decision support systems, technical notes, manuals, and an extensive WWW site: Since inception, the Program has satisfied over 4,000 requests for direct technical assistance. Over 3,500 personnel from Federal, state, and local agencies have been trained at 11 seminars on the latest techniques in regulating, testing, and managing dredged materials. Dredging Operations and Environmental Research Program (DOER). DOER, a ten-year, $48 million program, was established in response to numerous Corps field requests with support from groups with interests in ports, navigation, and environmental issues. The program focuses on dredging issues of national economic and environmental significance that involve both the physical processes of sediment and water dynamics, as well as the environmental concerns of contaminants, habitat, and ecological risk. A primary task in DOER is an aggressive technology transfer effort to assure rapid transition of costeffective and environmentally sensitive technology to field users. The DOER program is addressing operational, economic, and environmental demands and will be conducted in full coordination and cooperation with other appropriate agencies and offices, such as the Environmental Protection Agency, National Marine Fisheries Service, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. FY98 accomplishments included development of technology for cellbased assays for screening dioxin and dioxin-like compounds in sediments, and screening procedures for confined disposal facility reclamation; an evaluation of the economic impacts of environmental windows associated with dredging operations, a population dynamics model to assess risks of hydraulic entrainment by dredges, and sampling protocols for determining fish behavior in relation to turbidity plumes; interim tools for siting and evaluation of nearshore placement, and a cohesive sediment transport model; a technique for using risk assessment in dredging and dredged material management, and a method for using uncertainty analysis in improving dredged material management decisions; initial Tons Dry Solids and pipeline dredge Silent Inspector demonstrations; and guidance on available innovative technologies for beneficial applications of dredged materials. Risk Analysis for Water Resource Investments WES provides a range of research engineering input to this program, which is managed by IWR. The program objective is to develop and apply risk analysis techniques to a variety of Corps' civil works issues and problems in water resource planning, engineering, design, operations, and project management. Along with increases in budget constraints and local cost sharing, the concern for cost effective performance and reliability has raised the Corps' need to consider risk and uncertainty. During FY98, WES continued to develop and refine guidance and procedures for conducting required risk-based benefit-cost analyses. 44-8 For Major Rehabilitation, methods to quantify initial and future reliabilities of pile founded structures and gravity structures were refined. Procedures were developed for determining the stochastic fatigue crack growth in steel structures subjected to random loading. Reliability analysis continued to be added to the CASE programs such as CSLIDE and CPGA to create modular computer programs to calculate the reliability of gravity structures undergoing sliding problems and of pile groups. Advanced reliability procedures were added to previously developed models. Computer procedures continue to be developed to apply this guidance to reliability assessment and quantification of structural degradation rates, including time-dependent formulations and hazard functions. A draft guidance memorandum on this topic was prepared. WES continued to work with engineers from Ohio River districts to apply time-dependent procedures for application to the Ohio River Mainstem Navigation Study. Coastal Research Program The Coastal Research Program incorporates three coordinated individual programs to develop engineering technology products that reduce the cost of planning, designing, constructing, maintaining, and operating coastal harbor and navigation projects. The program also produces products that reduce the cost of coastal structures providing navigation protection as well as the costs of storm-damage reduction works. Engineering tools, computer models, and design guidance are developed for predicting waves that impact coastal structures and drive sedimentation processes; water levels that affect navigation, flooding, and storm damage; currents that affect navigation and sedimentation; and sediment movement that results in deposits in navigation channels and harbors. Research in understanding these phenomena is critical to effective and cost-efficient design and operation of navigation projects. Improving prediction of project and structure performance will reduce costly over-design, repairs, and maintenance. Existing Federal coastal infrastructure includes 800 coastal navigation projects with more than 400 miles of navigation structures (i.e., breakwaters and jetties) and approximately 100 stormdamage reduction and other related coastal projects. New technologies will provide solutions for improving coastal navigation projects, thereby reducing costs and lessening adverse impacts. Scanning Hydrographic Operational Airborne Lidar Survey (SHOALS) The SHOALS is a hydrographic survey system developed for the Corps through a joint program with the Canadian government. SHOALS consists of an airborne data collection system and a ground-based data processing system. The airborne system is capable of flying from either a helicopter or fixed wing aircraft. Currently, operations are conducted from either a Bell 212 helicopter provided by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Aircraft Operations Center through a Memorandum of Agreement or from a contracted DeHaviland Twin Otter. The data processing system is completely mobile and rapidly produces all survey products from the field. SHOALS ability to survey large areas rapidly results in considerable cost savings, on the order of half the cost of conventional ship-based surveys. The Airborne Lidar Bathymetry Technical Center of Expertise (ALBTCX), was established by the Acting Director of Civil Works on 22 July 1996, and expanded to a joint service center (JALBTCX) on 19 May 1998 with the addition of participation by the Naval Meteorology and Oceanography Command, Stennis Space Center. The mission of the JALBTCX is to operate the SHOALS airborne lidar system, evolve and expand SHOALS' capabilities, conduct world-wide survey and charting operations, and drive lidar 44-9 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY98 technology to fully meet Army and Navy requirements. The Center combines the extensive operational capabilities of the US Army Engineer District Mobile (SAM) with the research and development expertise of the US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station (WES) and the world-wide charting and oceanographic capabilities of the US Naval Oceanographic Office (NAVO). The JALBTCX, located at the Mobile District, is staffed by a team comprised of personnel from SAM, WES, and NAVO along with contracted personnel. The SHOALS team has the capability to meet all of the Center objectives and can operate the system world-wide in support of a broad array of military and civil works missions. The capabilities of the SHOALS system continue to be expanded and airborne lidar technology advanced by the JALBTCX. CORE-LOC CORE-LOC, the first concrete armor unit to be patented by the U.S. Government, was developed by WES for high-energy wave environments. An evaluation of this single-layer armor unit system has proven it has greater hydraulic stability and additional structural strength than any previous armor unit, and its single-layer application makes it far more economical than the commonly used two-layer systems. This technology has been and continues to be distributed to the Corps and the world resulting not only in direct savings to the taxpayers, but generating substantial royalty income for the U.S. Government through licensing of the patent. Patents have been applied for in a majority of the industrial coastal countries around the world. License agreements have been signed with four major firms, and WES is currently negotiating with one additional firm to market the CORE-LOC in various regions of the world. The first prototype CORE-LOC construction initiated in 1996 in South Africa has been completed and is performing well, and a larger CORE-LOC project is currently under construction in the Cape Verde Islands. The Corps implemented and completed a CORE-LOC repair project to the Manasquan Jetties, NJ, in November 1997, and is planning CORELOC projects in various Districts across the U.S. ACES 2.0 The Automated Coastal Engineering System (ACES PC Version 1.07) is an interactive personal-computer-based system for use in design and analysis of coastal projects. The software has over 1200 users throughout the Corps, private industry, and academia. ACES 2.0, released to Corps users in FY96, is an integrated workstation-based system connecting sophisticated prediction technology with large coastal data bases and visualization software in a userfriendly environment. These systems contain algorithms in the areas of wave theory, prediction, and transformation; wave/structure interaction; and littoral processes. ACES allows planners and designers to efficiently and comprehensively study open coast project alternatives, resulting in more reliable and costeffective engineering of coastal projects. Work to port ACES 2.0 to the Windows NT environment is underway. Field Wave Gaging The Field Wave Gaging (FWG) Program collects data from a nationwide network of about 50 coastal wave gages. Long-term measurements are analyzed to produce wave climate information for planning, design, and operation of coastal projects. In addition to building its multiyear database, the program distributes monthly summaries of all U.S. wave observations, produces standards for wave data 44-10 analysis and reduction, and supports research to improve data quality and reduce collection costs. Data in tabular and graphical form are available on the World Wide Web. CEDRS The Coastal Engineering Data Retrieval System (CEDRS) is an interactive database that provides hindcast and measured wind and wave data, as well as bathymetry and water levels for the U.S. coastline. The entire database is available on the World Wide Web. WIS The Wave Information Studies (WIS) provides hindcast wave and wind information and associated statistics for the Atlantic, Pacific, the Gulf of Mexico, and the Great Lakes. Federal agencies, academia, and private industry use these hindcasts to plan, design, and maintain coastal projects. Tropical cyclones (tropical storms and hurricanes) have been included in this database of information beginning in 1976 along with extratropical wind fields (daily conditions). A data assimilation procedure was used in some cases in the nowcast to augment available wind information. In FY98 additional hindcast information was added to the database to increase accurate statistical representation of wind and wave events. Hindcasts on the Pacific coastline were continued to supplement the existing database. A wave forecast for the Pacific Coast during El Nino 97-98 was generated to aid Corps planning and operational purposes. Technology Applications, Coastal Research Technologies developed in the Coastal Research Program were used in FY98 to assist Corps districts and divisions in designing harbor entrances, coastal channels, and shore protection. Some examples are: Barber's Point Harbor, HI. An existing 1:75 physical model of Barber's Point Harbor, Oahu, HI, was reactivated to assist the U.S. Army Engineer Division, Pacific Ocean and the State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation, Harbors Division, to optimize the required depths of the entrance channel and harbor to permit safe navigation of the new generation of bulk carriers and container vessels. Model studies were conducted using 1:75 scale, remote controlled vessels and state-of-theart video motion analysis systems to study shallow water vessel response in a coastal environment. Studies initiated in FY97 and completed in FY98, included numerical model studies to evaluate the effect planned harbor expansion options may have on water level fluctuations and flow velocities along existing and planned berthing areas. Daniel Island Container Terminal, Charleston, South Carolina. The South Carolina State Port Authority is engaged in a large terminal development project involving two terminal wharves on Daniel Island. The U.S. Army Engineers District, Charleston, (SAC) is performing economic and environmental analyses on channel designs. At WES, studies continue on new channel designs to access the terminal on the Wando River side, and on present navigation and sedimentation problems near the intersection of the Wando River, Hog Island, and Drum Island Reaches in Charleston Harbor. Future navigation conditions and maintenance dredging requirements will benefit from good channel design. Coastal Inlets Research Program The Coastal Inlets Research Program (CIRP) is a focused effort to increase Corps capabilities to cost effectively design and maintain the over 100 inlet projects which comprise the bulk of coastal operations and maintenance (O&M) expenditures of the Corps. CIRP was developed in response to Corps field requests for assistance in reducing O&M costs at coastal inlets. According to Corps estimates, expenditures will exceed $8 billion at coastal inlets over the next 25 years for dredging, structure installation, structure maintenance 44-11 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY98 and rehabilitation , and mitigation for damages caused by federal projects. The CIRP is providing insight into inlet processes and impacts of inlet activities on adjacent shores as well as new and improved capabilities for conducting O&M activities at inlets, and correcting any negative impacts of these activities on the adjacent shores. During FY98 research continued on the Sediment Budget Analysis System (SBAS), an automated PC system to develop inlet and coastal sediment budgets for managing inlet channels and dredged material placement, which will replace different methodologies presently used Corps-wide and will quantify uncertainty. Numerical modeling research includes the Inlet Modeling System (IMS) for field use to calculate tidal circulation, waves, and sediment transport at high resolution to allow assessment of jetty modifications and channel designs to reduce dredging and improve navigation safety. The Channel Equilibrium Line Model (CHANNELS) will predict the long-term change in channel cross-section and shoreline change along beaches and banks adjacent to inlets over time periods comparable to the authorized project life. Field data collection for CIRP model verification provided extensive supplemental benefits for District project studies, including measurements, model results, and grain size data in support of jetty scour blanket and channel redesign at Ponce De Leon Inlet, FL; modeling to devise a sand bypassing management plan and jetty scour protection at Shinnecock Inlet, NY; identification and correction of the scour mechanism responsible for considerable damage to Ventura Harbor breakwater, CA; and jetty rehabilitation modifications for reduced costs and greater protection at Grays Harbor, WA. Inland Navigation Program The Inland Navigation Program has been instrumental in developing design guidance for safe and efficient deep-draft and shallow-draft projects that is least disruptive to the environment. This has included design guidance in the form of Engineering Manuals for both deep- and shallow-draft waterways and transferring past and ongoing technology through Corps training courses and symposiums. The program was deeply involved in early development of the WES ship/tow simulator, a state-of-the-art design tool for waterway development. In FY98, experiments were completed on shallow-draft coastal port design guidance. This study required the enhancement of a stateof- the-art, three-dimensional motion analysis data acquisition system capable of measure the six degrees of freedom models of these small coastal vessels were subjected during the study. The design guidance developed through this research will allow designers significantly greater reliability for their shallow-draft coastal ports and the ability to determine the impacts of the design on the vessels using the ports. Research on inland channel depth and width requirements was initiated in FY98. The first effort of this research was determination of lock sill depths presently available at Corps projects and obtaining navigation conditions, based on observations from the towing industry and lock operators, associated with the wide variety of sill depths in use. Construction of a research flume began to optimize the design of lock approaches including guard and guidewalls. The objective of a new start on navigability of bendway weirs is to provide critical feedback from pilots and to conduct navigability experiments on the placement and design of submerged weirs in the navigation channel. 44-12 Technology Applications, Inland Navigation Technologies developed in the Inland Navigation Program were used in FY98 to assist Corps districts, local port authorities, and others in the design and improvement of navigation projects. Some examples are: Panama Canal Ship Motion Navigation Field Study The Panama Canal Commission (PCC) was faced with changing canal operations due to drought conditions caused by 'El Nino in fall of 1997. Operational and draft restrictions were instituted by the PCC for the first time since 1984 in order to maintain safe under-keel clearances and continue operations during the water shortage. To assist in their decision making regarding these restrictions, the PCC needed more information on vertical ship motion. WES, working with a contractor, Waterway Simulation Technology, Inc., deployed a field team to conduct full scale experiments with the PCC pilots to measure vertical ship motion or ship squat as it relates to vessel speeds and sizes in restricted channels. A team of five WES and two WST experts in field data collection and navigation, collected data during an 11-day period in December of 1997 using Differential Global Positioning System (DGPS) technology and landbased surveying techniques. Twentythree ships were boarded and equipped with DGPS while transiting the canal and the locks. The data were analyzed and WST provided the PCC with a report in March of 1998. In addition to providing the PCC with scientific and accurate data for decision making, the full scale experiments conducted during this study generated a first class data set of ship motion unlike any other in the world. Dredged Material Management Plan for the Ports of New York and New Jersey. Island Confined Disposal Facilities (CDF) and Confined Aquatic Disposal (CAD) pits are two of the options being considered by the New York District for placement of contaminated dredged material removed during maintenance of the Ports' navigation channels. A multilaboratory study is underway which involves application of a GIS-based procedure to screen potential aquatic placement sites. The analysis considered over 20 siting factors that addressed physical processes, environmental concerns, and institutional considerations. Extensive data sets representing each factor were integrated into the GIS database to facilitate the site evaluation process. Accomplishments during FY98 include numerical modeling to evaluate the impact of an island or pit on nearshore wave energy and sediment transport potential, to define the wave climate around the periphery of an offshore CDC island for use in sizing armor and addressing sensitivity of design cost to design wave conditions, to assess risk of movement of contaminated material following placement but before capping, and to design the CAD cap itself. The GIS database was used to represent a series of exclusionary and ranking criteria (aesthetics, site capacity, accessibility, local hydrodynamics, bathymetry, sediment characteristics, proximity to sensitive areas, etc.) for site evaluation. Sediment analyses were conducted in accordance with the USACE/EPA technical framework for design of the subaqueous cap for the CAD alternative. A suite of contaminate pathway experiments, leachate, and batch adsorption tests provided estimates of sediment-contaminant desorption and cap-containment adsorption coefficients, and contaminant breakthrough data for various cap thicknesses. Generic designs for capping and a sitespecific design for the CAD pit disposal option, and analyses of the long-term storage capacity of the CDF design options, were developed. Flood Damage Reduction Program The Flood Damage Reduction Program has provided numerous engineering tools to the Corps of 44-13 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY98 Engineers Field Offices over the years. The research accomplished through the execution of the Program has added significantly to the Corps mission to improve and maintain rivers and tributary streams for flood control. Additionally, recent research has been directed toward the environmental enhancement and restoration of streams. This research and overall objective has been accomplished through the development of guidance and systematic methods for the design and maintenance of multi-purpose flood control channels and structures. An excellent example of these tools is the PC code, "Hydraulic Design of Flood Control Channels (called SAM)" which has been widely accepted by Corps offices, the academic community, and the private sector for use in the design stage of a project. The SAM code provides the designer with information on all of the various hydraulic aspects of the design and allows the designer the ability to quickly study numerous alternatives. In FY98, research was completed on development of test procedure standards for the Corps Field Offices and Laboratories to use on Proprietary Products for Streambank Protection. This allows the Corps to evaluate alternatives to the typical stone-riprap material and provides a degree of potential acceptability of those proposed alternatives. Research continued on the Design and Maintenance of Vegetated Flood Control Channels. This research will provide an integration of engineering and environmental procedures for evaluating the impacts of vegetation in flood control channels. In FY98 work focused on hydraulic considerations such as impacts on flood levels and channel meandering when vegetation is present in those channels. Research on the Hydraulic Effects of In-stream Habitat and Erosion Control Structures addressed the monitoring of various structures at three field sites. Flume studies were also conducted to address the effects of boulders and boulder clusters in a channel on flood stages and velocity distributions. The results of this research will provide guidance on the impacts of environmental enhance modifications to flood control channels, which will add to the knowledge of combining project purposes to include environmental considerations. Innovative Filling and Emptying System Design. New navigation locks and dams are needed at many Corps projects to meet future navigation requirements. WES is helping develop new design and construction concepts for the Corps to reduce project costs. These concepts are quite different from previous lock designs used by the Corps, and laboratory experiments are necessary to help develop and evaluate these innovative new designs. One recently completed research effort involved through-the-sill intakes for lock projects. Physical models were used to evaluate and improve flow conditions in the upper lock approach to obtain uniformly distributed flow and to eliminate strong vortices. In a model study for the Corps' Nashville District of a 366-meter-lock addition at the existing Kentucky Lock and Dam project, a through-the-sill intake was successfully developed. An in-chamber longitudinal culvert system was developed for the 366- meter-long McAlpine Lock addition. An in-chamber culvert system is much less expensive than a conventional culvert system with the culverts located inside the lock walls. The McAlpine design consisted of two culverts with ports centered around the midpoint of the lock chamber, which provides a well-balanced filling system with minimal surface disturbance. WES is developing 44-14 design criteria for the in-chamber longitudinal culvert system. Other efforts include a laboratory investigation of the 244-meter-long Marmet replacement lock on the Kanawha River for the Corps' Huntington District. The in-chamber longitudinal culvert design is being evaluated with a through-the-sill intake and filling and emptying valves located in the lock walls. WES is also developing design guidance for the most effective methods to rehabilitate and increase the size of an existing 183-meterlong lock to a 366-meter-lock. Analytical and laboratory investigations were also initiated to determine the flow conditions and hydraulic forces on the float-in sediments during the different construction phases of the Monongahela No. 2 Navigation Dam replacement project. Materials Research Program The integrated materials programs provided solutions to field-identified problems involving investigation, design, and construction of project features associated with water control structures. The Geotechnical Engineering Research Program emphasized the development of innovative methods for flood protection and storm damage reduction. Measures for predicting and reducing erosion of soil and rock spillway channels were evaluated and methods for reducing the cost and time required to design and build flood protection structures were under development. The Concrete and Structural Engineering Program emphasized the properties and behavior of concrete materials and development of design and analysis techniques as well as computer-aided computational tools. The overall thrust of these programs is to produce project features in a more economical manner while ensuring that public safety is maintained on Corps projects. Geotechnical Engineering Research. This program was driven by needs for less costly, more timely flood protection and storm damage reduction. Erosion of spillway channels was identified as a major concern; this has led to high priority research to accurately predict erosion and develop methods for reducing this costly storm damage phenomenon. The need to reduce real estate acquisition costs and provide timely flood control structures has created the need for guidance for design of innovative structures built with man-made materials or embankments with reinforcements so that steeper embankments can be built on marginal foundation materials in less time. Development of applications guidance for trenchless technology is being driven by the need to reduce operations and maintenance costs and provide services to partners. This family of technologies can provide nondisruptive solutions for seepage control, drainage, and raw water intake pipelines for municipalities that partner on Corps reservoir projects. The Geotechnical Engineering Research Program has vigorously pursued an initiative to develop risk and reliability based methods for analysis of levee and earth dam safety. This effort is aiding decision makers in rationalizing expenditures of scarce resources to upgrade or rehabilitate older structures. The Analytical Model Development efforts are providing designers with greater confidence in developing measures to ensure the safe performance of structures subjected to large deformations and severe loading conditions. The focused research efforts are producing results that are reducing storm damage and providing greatly enhanced flood protection. Implementation is critical and relies on a strong emphasis on technology transfer. This technology transfer effort gets the results to the user, and provides the support needed by the field for easy implementation. Concrete and Structural Engineering Research. This program improves the Corps' structural engineering design practices by addressing identified high-priority mission problems whose solutions are within the reach of the present state of the art. It 44-15 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY98 investigates a variety of concrete materials and construction practices which may be used to economically construct Corps structures while maintaining or improving overall performance and durability, thus reducing the cost of constructing new structures and maintaining existing facilities while increasing the safety. The biennial tour and review of specimens at the Treat Island natural weathering exposure station was conducted in August 1998. The Computer Aided Structural Engineering (CASE) Project has developed and released 126 computer programs, published 131 reports, prepared 32 criteria documents, and conducted 86 short courses. The Computer Analysis of Welds work has developed guide specifications for repair of hydraulic steel structures. The results of this research have successfully produced analytical procedures for modeling the welding process in steel connections and have provided a means to estimate local residual stresses and material properties in weldments. In view of the Corps' move to innovative designs for navigation projects, this is expected to be a critical capability which will provide the basis for evaluation of both new, innovative connections and existing connections. Research also focuses on validating and improving the methods used to perform nonlinear, incremental structural analysis (NISA) studies. Results of the NISA research have validated and improved existing methodology through laboratory experiments and numerical studies. Results of this research will reduce construction costs and improve the reliability of the structure. Products from this program are being used at every Corps office. High Performance Construction Materials and Systems. The High- Performance Construction Materials and Systems research program, a multi-laboratory program, was initiated in FY 98. The objectives of this program are: (a) to develop new and improved high-performance materials and systems; (b) to optimize the maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation of Corps structures using high-performance materials and systems; (c) to demonstrate the use of innovative materials and systems; (d) to provide assistance in implementing the technology; and (e) to promote technology transfer throughout the construction industry by cooperative agreements and costsharing efforts with other federal agencies and the private sector. Research and development will be conducted on high-performance materials and systems with emphasis on their use for maintenance and repair of Corps civil works structures. Analytical and experimental studies will be conducted to identify, evaluate, and develop high-performance concretes, high-performance steels, highperformance coatings, and highperformance systems to meet Corps needs. Corps efforts will be leveraged whenever possible by collaborative, cost-shared efforts with other government agencies and the private sector. Innovations for Navigation Projects (INP) Research Program The INP research program was established to aid districts in their efforts to provide innovative approaches to constructing navigation projects. The objective of this multi-laboratory, multi-discipline program is to identify and develop technologies and methods to reduce construction time and cost and minimize disturbance to navigation and the environment during construction. The focus is on technologies for Lift-in, Float-in, and In-the-wet construction. This will include designs for new filling and emptying systems for locks, the use of alternative construction 44-16 methods, underwater construction with precast concrete elements, underwater concrete placement techniques, construction of foundations underwater, quality assurance/quality control techniques, design of innovative lock walls for barge impact load, innovations for lock gate operating equipment, and contracting procedures for innovative designs and construction methods. Criteria will be provided for enhanced construction materials such as controlled, low-strength materials for backfill, underwater concrete for foundations and filling precast modules, lightweight concretes for float-in construction, and connections and seals for joining precast elements and modules underwater. Accomplishments in FY98 included evaluation of global positioning systems to track the lift-in placement of a lower guidewall protection cell; evaluation of numerous soil-based controlled lowstrength materials; development of contracting methods to employ in new types of construction; model flume evaluation of in-chamber, longitudinal culverts; and development of a numerical model to evaluate filling and emptying systems for the extension of 600 foot locks. Another important aspect of this program initiated in FY98 is the emphasis placed on rapid technology transfer through the use of the INP Homepage on the Internet. Earthquake Engineering Research Program In spite of major advances over the last 25 years, serious gaps in our knowledge base still exist in the areas of earthquake hazard predictions; site characterization for seismically sensitive parameters; constitutive behavior and material properties of rock, soils, and composite (reinforced) materials under seismic loads; and the stress and deformation responses of sites and facilities to seismic loading. Economical remediation and defensive design techniques are needed in addition to careful calibration of fast advancing numerical methods to actual field performance. In order to address these issues, this program is producing design tools and criteria which incorporate innovative measures for increasing the seismic safety of Corps and other public facilities. During FY 98, a breakthrough in liquefaction analysis of soil was accomplished. This advance quantifies the effect of high confining stresses on soil liquefaction potential for embankment dams. Guidelines were developed on the application of numerical and constitutive models for seismic analysis. Computer tools were revised to enable transfer of stateof- the-practice procedures to district offices. Models were developed to account for pore pressure from cyclic loading and to analyze the reaction of concrete dams to strong earthquakes. INTERDISCIPLINARY/LARGE-SCALE STUDIES Increasingly, WES expertise and products developed in R&D programs are being requested in comprehensive, integrated packages that address broad or critical areas of concern. Demonstration Erosion Control (DEC) Project During FY98 WES continued DEC monitoring efforts through data collection and data management, evaluation of the hydraulic performance of structures, evaluation of channel response, development of hydrologic tools for input into sediment yield calculations, determination of measurable changes in the quantity of sediment being transported from upland watersheds, determination of the effects of the DEC Project on reservoir sedimentation, bank stabilization efforts including new applications such as bendway weirs and bioengineering techniques such as willow posts, and development of design criteria for application to other watersheds with erosion problems. Upper Mississippi River - Illinois 44-17 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY98 Waterways Navigation Study (UMR-IWS) Due to the deterioration of much of the navigation infrastructure on the UMR-IWS, and the potential for increased navigation traffic on these key waterways over the next 50 years, the Corps is evaluating alternative investment strategies for providing reliable navigation projects on the UMR-IWS. Equally, the natural resources of the UMR-IWS represent one of the most vital eco-systems in the United States. Thus, as a critical component of the Corps' study, the environmental impacts of increased navigation traffic on the UMR-IWS, and potential measures to avoid, minimize, and/or mitigate any associated impacts, are being assessed. WES continued technical leadership of several critical aspects of the environmental studies. WES is leading the Modeling Integration Simulation Team (MIST), a multidisciplinary technical team charged by the Corps with coordinating and integrating the major environmental study components. These components involve multiple studies in fisheries, aquatic macrophytes, mussels, bank erosion, recreational boat craft, side channel/backwater sedimentation, tow-induced physical forces, and hydrodynamic modeling. WES completed state-of-the-art analyses of the physical forces imparted by moving tows on a waterway, the resuspension of sediment resulting from tow passage, and the potential for transport of these resuspended sediments into critical side channel and backwater aquatic habitats. In FY98, the sediment study including resuspension of channel bed material due to a towboat moving through the water, from the propeller disturbing the bed material, and from the shallow-water waves created by the towboat. A computer code, NAVEFF, was written by a WES researcher which links the hydraulic parameters from towboats to provide input to the various sediment and wave models and to the various biological models being used for the study. In FY98, efforts were initiated to develop a model capable of linking all the hydraulic, sediment, and biological models together. This model, referred to as the System Model, will allow researcher, field engineers, and various resource interests to consider different alternatives and considerations for the entire UMR-IWS. For the.ongoing study and future studies this will provide a comprehensive tool which interacts with the various components and provides detailed evaluations for the issues under study. The integration of all of these models requires working and coordinating numerous issues and study effects with local, state, and Federal agencies within the study area. South Florida Regional Water Resources The Jacksonville District tasked WES to develop a comprehensive hydrologic modeling system for examining impacts of C-111I Canal operations on regional water resources. The water resources in the area consist of coupled surface water and groundwater systems that, depending upon the hydrologic cycle, could be dominated by either system individually. There are a wide variety of local concerns that have mutually exclusive interests in the future operations of Corps projects in south Florida, so solutions to the water resources problems will need to be optimized against competing interests. The surface water components of the modeling system will simulate estuarine circulation and transport, including the effects of canal diversions on Florida Bay salinity distributions. The groundwater portion of the modeling system will simulate the effect of surface and 44-18 groundwater interactions in the vicinity of the flood control channels and the exchanges of groundwater with Florida Bay. During FY98, research continued using a multi-dimensional modeling system was constructed for the surface water of Florida Bay and the groundwater and canal systems of southeastern Florida in support of ecosystem restoration and water management. The surface water components of the modeling system simulate estuarine circulation and transport, including the effects of canal diversions on Florida Bay salinity distributions. The groundwater portion of the modeling system simulates the effect of surface and groundwater interactions in the vicinity of the flood control canals and exchanges of groundwater with Florida Bay. Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Model Study Chesapeake Bay is the Nation's largest and most productive estuary. The bay is plagued with problems (bottom-water anoxia, decline in fisheries, and loss of submerged aquatic vegetation) that accompany agricultural and industrial development and population growth along its shores and headwaters. In 1988, WES formed a multi-disciplinary team to develop fully 3-D hydrodynamic and water quality models of the bay. The work was jointly funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Baltimore District. The models were employed to guide the 1991 reevaluation of cleanup strategies in the bay and were widely acclaimed by the technical community. In FY98, the tributary refinements were completed. Results indicate the model provides an accurate and comprehensive representation of eutrophication processes in the bay and major tributaries. The study demonstrated that mean total nitrogen and phosphorus at the bay mouth can be computed when constant concentrations of these substances are specified 30 to 75 km away from the bay mouth. The study demonstrates that with the environmental model and its associated watershed and hydrodynamic models, it is possible to compute abundances of zooplankton, SAV, and benthos that agree with data aggregated over annual time scales and at spatial scales on the order of 100 sq km. The model is presently being employed to guide the 1999 reevaluation of management strategies in the bay. Cooperative Research with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency WES has continued to conduct cooperative research with the EPA in the development, testing, and application of spatially varying hydrology models. Investigation of linking the CASC2D 2-D overland runoff and channel routing model with existing water-quality models has continued and initial testing of this linkage is planned for FY99. The CASC2D code is capable of performing long-term simulations of rainfallrunoff events. Refinement of a 2-D hydrology code linked to the groundwater flow and transport code FEMWATER has also progressed. Future plans are underway to extend the development of these new concept computer models into applications such as determination of Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) and assessing impacts of land management practices on the environment. Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) WES developed the HELP computer program for the EPA under a cooperative agreement. To date, more than 3,000 private engineering firms in a dozen countries, 75 universities, 500 state and local government offices, 150 Federal offices, and 300 foreign government and private firms have used HELP to evaluate solid and hazardous waste landfills. A Spanish version is being distributed throughout the Pan American countries. WES worked with the German Federal Ministry of the Environment and the German Geotechnical Society to transfer the HELP model to Germany and the rest of western Europe. WES 44-19 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY98 is assisting the Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, to incorporate the HELP model into the Department of Energy's Los Alamos National Laboratory Decision Support System for Evaluation of Landfill Cover Designs. EPA estimates that the cost savings from using HELP currently total over $250 million. With 3,000 landfills undergoing closure in response to the RCRA amendments and about 400 new landfills being planned, each averaging more than 30 acres in size, the potential savings are more than $10 billion in the U.S. alone. Los Angeles County Drainage Area (LACDA) WES developed numerous modifications to the existing high velocity channels in Los Angeles, California. Undertaken as a costshared effort between the County of Los Angeles, CA and the Los Angeles District, efforts were focused on design modifications to existing bridges. These took the form of modifications to existing piers, bridge abutments, and the addition of sills on the channel invert. Additional modifications involved the removal of several existing equestrian ramps. Additional levee height was also required to contain the design flow and WES developed water-surface profiles to assist the Los Angeles District in designing the additional levee or parapet wall height. The project is currently under construction and the WES models are being used to check and modify the design as construction proceeds. Such coordination is providing a fast paced project with assurance that the constructed design will work as anticipated. This is particularly important on this project due to the existing channel slope being at approximately the critical slope. With this situation, minor deviations between the design and the constructed channel can have serious consequences in the resulting flow conditions. The WES-recommended changes are much less expensive than the complete bridge replacement originally thought to be necessary and savings in excess of $200 million are being realized. Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors Modeling Program In response to the expansion of oceanborne world commerce, the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, CA, are conducting planning studies for harbor development in coordination with the Los Angeles District to accommodate master plan development through the year 2020. The Corps will be responsible for providing navigation channels with increased depth and for determining effects of the harbor improvements on levels of wave energy in berthing areas as well as water quality. A comprehensive modeling program to determine these effects based on state-of-the-art field data and modeling technology was developed and has been implemented. Columbia and Snake Rivers Fish Guidance Studies The number of adult salmon migrating up the Columbia/Snake River System to spawn has decreased in recent years. Some of this reduction is attributed to construction of dams and hydroelectric projects. Since juvenile salmon that migrate to the ocean along the same path as their parents do not use fish ladders at these projects, they must pass through the powerhouse, over the spillway or be diverted around the structure. Numerous laboratory and field studies are under way to improve fish attraction, guidance, collection and bypass to reduce the mortality rate of juveniles moving downstream. These studies involve numerical and physical model studies of flow 44-20 conditions near the structures, various screening devices, surface collectors, bypass channels and other fish guidance devices. Field studies are being conducted to determine fish behavior and reaction to various modifications to the prototype structures. Acoustic technologies are being developed to improve the performance of the various bypass systems being investigated. San Juan Bays and Estuaries WES has developed a 3-D hydrodynamic and water quality model of the San Juan bays and estuaries (SJBE) system. The SJBE system experiences poor water quality due to insufficient flushing and excessive pollutant loadings. The model has been calibrated to data collected during the summer of 1995. The model is being used to evaluate alternatives for improving water quality through increased flushing and loading reductions. The study is being conducted through the Jacksonville District for the SJBE Program, with funding provided by the EPA. Manufactured Soil from Dredged Material The manufacture of artificial soil using dredged material and recyclable organic waste materials (such as biosolids derived from reconditioned sewage sludge, animal manure, yard waste, and sawdust) provides a solution for disposal of dredged material and sewage sludge. Cooperative research and development agreements have been established with commercial companies to develop and demonstrate this innovative technology. Uncontaminated manufactured soil can potentially be used as unrestricted topsoil, while soil manufactured from contaminated dredged material will be restricted and potentially used as cover for Superfund, mining, and landfill sites. Manufactured soil procedures are currently being applied to dredged material in the Buffalo, Jacksonville, and New York Districts. INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SUPPORT PROMIS The Programs and Project Management Information System (PROMIS) is the Corps of Engineers standard automated information system that supports Programs and Project Management. It provides program and project managers with a single point of entry for project management information in support of Military, Civil, and HTRW projects. PROMIS is a client/server application written in the Ada programming language and operating in a Microsoft Windows 95 or NT environment. Corps-wide deployment of PROMIS was approved by the Corps Major Automated Information System Review Counsel (CMAISRC) on 25 August 1996. Deployment of the software and remote site user training was completed 15 August 1997. The PROMIS software has been available at all Divisions and Districts since that time. On-site user support is also available upon request. At the end of FY98, 10,626 projects were registered in PROMIS production databases Corps-wide and 7,418 users have been granted access. CENTERS AND INSTITUTES Because of its unique organization and broad mission, WES applies multidisciplinary approaches to complex problems within the framework of a single overall management structure. Such approaches are especially important in critical, complicated areas such as environmental quality. Centers and Institutes have been established as part of this structure to facilitate interdisciplinary efforts and to serve as focal points for expertise in specific technical areas. Coastal Engineering Research Center (CERC) The Coastal Engineering Research Center (CERC) was established by Public Law in 1963 as a direct successor to the Beach Erosion Board which was created by Congress in 1930. When CERC merged with the Hydraulics Laboratory to form the 44-21 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY98 Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory, CERC remained as a center within the Laboratory to provide direction in coastal engineering research. CERC receives guidance from the Corps' Coastal Engineering Research Board (CERB). The CERB was established by Public Law and is chaired by the Corps' Director of Civil Works. CERB members include three Division engineers and three eminent coastal engineers and scientists in academia or the private sector. The WES Commander is the Board's Executive Secretary. Concrete Technology Center (CTC) The CTC is a Support Center providing technical assistance and testing services to USACE commands in the area of concrete materials, construction technology, forensic studies, and rehabilitation of concrete structures. The CTC maintains state-of-the-art competence in cementitious materials, aggregates, admixtures, and construction techniques including mixing, placing, consolidating, and curing conventional concrete, mass concrete, roller-compacted concrete, polymer concrete, and other highperformance concrete. The CTC operates in close collaboration with experienced practitioners in Corps field offices. Wetlands Research and Technology Center (WRTC) The WRTC consolidates all areas of wetlands science and engineering, including the Corps' National Wetlands Research Program and other sponsor-specific wetlands R&D, wetlands training, interagency coordination, and technology transfer. In FY98, the WRTC hotline responded to over 1,000 inquiries from Corps and non-Corps sources. The Center coordinates interdisciplinary teams to respond to sponsors' needs for application of state-of-the-knowledge wetlands techniques and methodologies. Emphasis is placed on the transfer of technology developed in the Characterization and Restoration of Wetlands Research Program (CRWRP). Center for Contaminated Sediments (CCS) The CCS focuses on the problem of contaminated sediments, to include identification, assessment, evaluation, and management. Activities include technical and regulatory assistance, training, technology transfer, research and development, and response to general information requests. The CCS incorporates over two decades of experience in research and development supporting Corps navigation dredging and mission support work related to military clean-up activities. Specific assistance is given to the environmental toxicology and risk assessment of high-profile contaminants such as dioxins. Center for Cultural Site Preservation Technology The Center for Cultural Site Preservation Technology consolidates administrative, technological, and research skills at WES and other Corps laboratories in support of scientific and engineering cultural site protection and preservation, training, and interagency coordination. It serves as an information clearinghouse and a source of interdisciplinary technical expertise and direct technical assistance for anyone seeking answers to cultural site protection and preservation questions. The Center serves the Corps, the DoD, other Federal and government agencies, academia, and the private sector. Hazardous Waste Research Center Managing hazardous and toxic waste is an important thrust nationwide, and WES is playing a major role. Research efforts are 44-22 coordinated through the Hazardous Waste Research Center (HWRC). The HWRC provides research and development and innovative technology demonstration support to all Corps field operating elements and the 10 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regions under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the Superfund program, and the Assessment and Remediation of Contaminated Sediments program under the Clean Water Act. The HWRC has been involved in BDAT (best demonstrated available technology) development work for EPA, and has conducted treatability investigations at Federal facility sites. The HWRC conducts and assists in treatability evaluations for other Federal agencies on a cost-reimbursable basis and is currently working with several private companies under cooperative research and development agreements to expedite the transfer of remnediation technologies to the commercial and private sectors. The HWRC is currently permitted by the EPA and the State of Mississippi, under RCRA, to store and treat most listed and characteristic hazardous wastes, in conjunction with research and development studies conducted onsite. Center for Aquatic Plant Research and Technology The Center for Aquatic Plant Research and Technology (CAPRT) was established to coordinate and facilitate all aquatic plant research and resulting technology transfer. The CAPRT responds to anyone seeking answers to aquatic plant questions, and addresses Federal-wide aquatic plant management and technology coordination needs for both civil and military programs. The CAPRT provides administrative and technological leadership, facilitation, and coordination of aquatic plant research and technology development under the auspices of the Corps' Aquatic Plant Control Research Program. In FY98 the CAPRT continued to administer research efforts under a cooperative agreement with the University of Miami, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, Cooperative Institute for Ecological Studies. The purpose is to develop the most effective and economic measures for managing aquatic vegetation and to develop and implement research that leads to an improved understanding of the relationships between freshwater and estuarine/marine ecologies. CAPRT continued to facilitate and coordinate working groups of applied scientists from the Corps and other Federal agencies involved in efforts to enhance technical understanding of aquatic plant management. Tri-Service CADD/GIS Technology Center This Center was established to develop standards and foster the application of computer-aided design and drafting (CADD) and geographic information system (GIS) technologies throughout the Army, Navy, and Air Force; promote system integration; support centralized acquisition; and provide assistance for the installation, training, operation, and maintenance of CADD/GIS systems. This includes directing specific applications development, promoting communications, promoting standards, furnishing technical advice, interfacing with professional organizations and industry, evaluating technological developments, and recommending necessary CADD/GIS policy. Civil Works Guidance Update Center The Civil Works Guidance Update Center is tasked with modernizing Corps civil works engineering guidance criteria contained in engineering manuals, technical letters, regulations, circulars, and pamphlets. The necessity for this effort is to comply with 1986 and 1988 Water Resources Development Acts that mandate cost sharing between the government and local sponsors for water resources, shore protection, and navigation projects. Such cost sharing in turn required modernizing Corps criteria for acceptance by the engineering profession and local sponsors as being cost effective and adhering to the current state of 44-23 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY98 practice. Environmental Modeling, Simulation, and Assessment Center (EMSAC) The EMSAC functions to advance the development of environmental modeling, simulation, and assessment tools for the Corps, the Army, DoD, and other agencies. The center relies on a combination of organizational elements, institutes, and centers at WES and other agencies to form technical teams of engineers and scientists to solve environmental problems at the large-scale, ecosystem level. These problems frequently involve predicting and assessing the effects of environmental conditions across various media in varying time and spatial scales. The EMSAC provides a focus for development of large-scale, multidisciplinary environmental studies and enhances the development of modeling, simulation, and assessment research. Current activities in the EMSAC are directed toward 1) assessing and forecasting the effects of increased navigation on the Upper Mississippi River (UMR) ecosystem; 2) habitat restoration on the UMR ecosystem; 3) assessing and forecasting the ecological condition of Florida Bay, with and without alterations to hydrology and land use in south Florida; and 4) developing a Land Management System for application to Army civil and military land management/restoration needs. Ecosystem Modeling Institute (EMI) The EMI provides a focus for modeling aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Membership in the institute is drawn from a wide range of technical backgrounds, including hydrodynamic modeling, water quality modeling, limnology, ecotoxicology, geographic information systems, and ecology. The EMI fosters cooperative efforts with other agencies and academia. The EMI is currently involved in developing models linking abiotic and ecological processes. Such linked models will enable investigation and prediction of selected ecosystem responses across broad spatial and temporal scales. Software Technology Center The Software Technology Center (STC) is chartered by HQUSACE to investigate and evaluate new and emerging software technologies and methodologies and recommend those most suited for the implementation within the Corps. Responsibilities encompass all aspects of software and software engineering: operating systems; new, custom, and commercial applications; process, data, and object modeling methodologies and tools; requirements definition; lifecycle management; configuration management methodologies and tools; and impacts of changes in DoD and Army technical guidance upon Corps information management policies and practices. Natural Resources R&D Center (NRRDC) This Center advocates and coordinates investigations on natural and cultural resources in a watershed context. The NRRDC coordinates R&D efforts in such areas as resource identification, evaluation, modeling, restoration, mitigation, and management activities. The NRRDC is responsive to rapidly developing biodiversity, ecosystem, landscape, and watershed management initiatives and is an advocate for increased Army participation in such initiatives. The Center provides the initial point of contact for Department of Army Natural Resources R&D and technical assistance needs; promotes a landscape-based approach to natural resources characterization, analysis, and management; improves information exchange and coordination in Natural Resources programs and issues; facilitates organization of teams to address Department of Army Natural 44-24 Resources R&D and technical assistance needs; and facilitates preparation and processing of R&D and technical assistance proposals. River Engineering and Stream Restoration Center (RESRC) The River Engineering and Stream Restoration Center was established in FY96. The Center provides the focal point for the Corps and other agencies in providing rapid, expert advice to address complex river engineering problems. Environmental Chemistry Center On 15 March 1998, the Corps Chemistry and Materials Quality Assurance Laboratory became the newest member of the WES team. Although remaining physically in Omaha, NE, the laboratory was realigned as the Chemistry Quality Assurance Branch in the new Environmental Chemistry Center (ECC) of the Environmental Laboratory. A total package of environmental chemistry research, development, and testing support is now available. Construction was completed on a 2,040-square-meter state-of-the-art analytical research and testing facility. This, the most modern facility in the Department of Defense, coupled with the addition of the Omaha facility, has resulted in over 4,000 square meters of worldclass chemistry laboratory. The combination has greatly expanded the ability to respond to the highpriority needs of customers. EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES WES has unparalleled experimental facilities and equipment, with capital assets of over $700 million including $200 million in information technology resources. The research and development missions are technically supported by extensive in-house capabilities in instrumentation and a full array of shops for engineering and construction services. High Performance Computing Facility In support of the DoD High Performance Computing (HPC) Modernization Program, WES manages and operates the Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station Major Shared Resource Center (CEWES MSRC). The Center provides cutting-edge computational, mass storage, networking, and scientific visualization services to approximately 700 users engaged in Defense RDT&E throughout the Defense Services and Agencies. Current capabilities of the DoD HPC MSRC at WES include an aggregate computational capability of approximately 900 billion calculations per second and an online storage capability in excess of 100 trillion characters. The CEWES MSRC specializes in the computational technology areas of computational structural mechanics, computational fluid dynamics, climate/weather/ocean modeling, forces modeling and simulation, and environmental quality modeling and simulation. A team of in-house PhDs assembled from leading universities and national research centers in HPC provide leadership and coordination for the Programming Environment and Training (PET) program, a technology transfer initiative supported by the Center. WES is an active partner within Defense in several key areas of HPC including the implementation of scaleable HPC systems, highperformance networking initiatives such as the Defense Research and Engineering Network (DREN), and the development and implementation of innovative distance learning techniques to educate and train its world wide customer base. High Speed, High-Bandwidth Communication Facilities WES has one of the most advanced communication networks in the Nation, comprised of two fiber optic backbones. The first is a 21-km-long multimode fiberoptic mesh connecting 48 research facilities spread over 273 hectares and operating at FDDI speeds (100Mb/sec) . This backbone connects 72 local area networks (LANs) to high-performance computing resources at WES and other DoD/Army sites. The second is an 11-km-long 44-25 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY98 single-mode fiber-optic backbone connecting 10 research facilities at 622Mb/sec. This asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) network is scalable up to 2.5Gb/sec. The WES backbone networks and LANs and their interconnectivity are all monitored and managed by a state-of-the art centralized network monitoring facility. Directional Spectral Wave Generator This computer-controlled facility can reproduce waves of varying period, amplitude, and direction in the laboratory, thereby enabling research addressing the "real world" effects of waves on coastal structures. Engineering Geology Research Facility This facility provides full stateof- the art support to engineering geology problems such as site characterization and hydrogeological and geochemical investigations. Extensive site characterization capabilities using both intrusive and non-intrusive techniques are enhanced by sedimentation and soils laboratories, and by geographic information system facilities supporting geologic research and operated under Tri-Service GIS spatial data standards. The full range of petrographic equipment and expertise necessary for determinative mineralogy, microscopy, and geochemistry are available through partnering with the WES Materials Research and Forensic Facility. Current investigations involve groundwater modeling, geoarcheology, and regional hydrogeology. Materials Research and Forensic Facility This one-of-a-kind facility is equipped with two scanning electron microscopes, x-ray diffractometer, atomic absorption spectroscope, infrared spectroscope, rheometer, calorimeter, gas and liquid chromatograph, energy-dispersive xray spectrometer, light microscopes, and high-resolution 4096 by 4096 pixel video color-image analysis capability uniquely adapted to the study of microscopic and macroscopic features of construction materials. Fate and Effects Facility This 2,660-m2 unique combination of laboratory facilities contains stateof- the-art analytical instrumentation and monitoring equipment to study the behavior of inorganic and organic contaminants in the environment. It permits determination of critical biogeochemical cycles and microbiological processes important to bioremediation of contaminated soils and sediments. A molecular microbiology capability is also available to facilitate development and validation of microbial biomarkers for evaluating effects of contaminants on target organisms. Trotter's Shoals Limnological Research Facility (TSLRF) Located on the shore of Richard B. Russell Lake near Calhoun Falls, SC, the TSLRF offers the opportunity to study reservoirs, tailwaters, and watershed processes and effects. The facility, which has been in operation since 1983, includes offices, a complete water quality laboratory, and a fleet of research boats. A staff of five scientists and engineers offer a wide range of expertise and capabilities. Recent studies have centered on the effects of pump storage on water quality and fisheries at Richard B. Russell Lake, remote monitoring of water quality, loading impacts, and operational effects on tailwater quality. Prototype Data Facility This 1858 m2 facility houses staff and equipment to support acquisition of coastal and nearshore data. A multi-million dollar inventory of state-of-the-art oceanographic 44-26 instruments is maintained in readiness for quick deployment to meet the Corps' need for coastal data. A unique system of networked computers supports instrument maintenance, calibration, and testing; hardware and software development; data acquisition from a network of 22 wave/tide gages; and data analysis. Coastal Field Research Facility The largest facility of its type in the world and located on a 72- hectare site at Duck, NC, it includes a 600m research pier and associated laboratory and data collection equipment for monitoring the coastal/ocean margin. Scientific Visualization Center (SVC) The SVC is an integral part of the high-performance computing, highspeed communications, and visualization triad. The Center provides a variety of integrated graphics, animation, and video capabilities to help analyze complex behavior of scientific phenomena associated with solving large and complex numerical problems. Special capabilities of the Center include collaborative and immersive technologies, virtual reality, direct volume visualization, and data sonification. Navigation Effects Flume This 122m long by 21.3m wide by 1.2m deep basin is equipped for research on the physical effects of navigation on the environment, navigation channel stability, and vessel performance in a variety of navigation settings. The flume includes a towing carriage and a recirculating water supply system to simulate flow effects on navigation. Sediment and Water Quality Sampling Facilities As part of the multi-agency Federal Interagency Sedimentation Project, special facilities for sediment and water quality sampling provide world-recognized equipment, technology, and research for future improvements. Ship/Tow Simulator Linked, real-time maneuvering simulators, specially developed for navigation channel design and evaluation, can simulate both deep ports and harbors and inland waterways. The simulators are linked to complex hydrodynamic models to accurately portray currents and wave conditions that impact vessel handling. An interactive, multi-disciplinary approach uses teams of specialists, including licensed pilots, for design of the optimum channel to minimize dredging and construction costs and maintain navigation safety. Riprap Test Facility This is the largest curved channel test facility of its kind. It is capable of recirculating flows up to 5.7 cubic meters per second in a 237.7m long special design open channel that is .9m deep and 3.7m wide. The facility is used to develop design criteria for riprap protection on stream banks and flood control channels, and to study other hydraulic problems associated with curved channel flow. Longshore Sediment Transport Facility A 3-D movable-bed Longshore Sediment Transport Facility (LSTF) is being constructed, which will simulate nearshore hydrodynamic and sediment transport processes at a large geometric scale. The facility is being constructed in a 50-m-long, 30- m-wide, 1.4-m-deep basin. The facility will have the capability to generate a total longshore sediment transport rate equivalent to approximately 60,000 m3/year. This rate is almost two orders of magnitude greater than that previously generated in smaller scale movable-bed laboratory experiments. The LSTF will be the largest three dimensional moveable-bed facility in the world for investigating nearshore processes. The hydrodynamic components of the facility have been completed (irregular wave generators, current re-circulation system, instrumentation bridge with a beach profiler and wave and current sensors, data acquisition system). Hydrodynamic testing is underway, as 44-27 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY98 is the design of the sediment recirculation system. Aquatic and Wetland Plant Field Research Facility A 50-hectare facility at Lewisville, TX, incorporates 53 research ponds, laboratory and office space, a greenhouse, a mesocosm system for evaluating aquatic pesticides (30 tanks, 2,500 liters each), 18 flowing-water raceways, and additional tank systems for deep- and shallow-water studies. Work includes biological, chemical, and ecological studies of aquatic plants and management techniques. A Variable Depth and Light Tank Facility was recently completed, consisting of eighteen 14,000-liter tanks that are used to investigate seasonal growth and development of problem aquatic plants under low-light conditions. Materials Testing Center (MTC) In August 1997, the MTC was designated as the Corps' materials testing and inspection center. The MTC can conduct all conventional and specialized materials testing services for Corps Districts. The MTC also provides Corps-wide laboratory QA/QC inspection services required by ER 1110-2-8100. The MTC has full capabilities for all tests of soil, rock, concrete, aggregates, cements, pozzolans, admixtures, water, and related items. Specialized capabilities include high-energy concrete mixtures, scanning electron microscopes, automatic creep and thermal properties facility, and automatically controlled temperature and humidity chambers for materials testing. The MTC has a fully-equipped lab for conventional and Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP) asphalt binder testing and mix design. Engineering Geophysics Training Facility. This facility is used for both the testing of geophysical instruments and the applied training in geophysical methods and techniques. Metallic and non-metallic target anomalies buried at this site are detected by a variety of geophysical techniques and methods including electrical, electromagnetic, magnetic, ground penetrating radar, resistivity, microgravity, and seismic refraction. The facility is used periodically by the Corps and other agencies for training geophysicists, calibration of equipment, and quality assurance for new technology. Trenchless Technology Test Facility This unique instrumented field testing facility consisting of a 170m long test bed allows evaluation of microtunneling and directional drilling pipe ramming and pipe bursting system performance under documented controlled conditions. Emerging technologies for non-intrusive site characterization have also been evaluated using this facility. Centrifuge Research Facility This complex houses the world's most powerful centrifuge (1,144gmetric tons) with a 6.4m radius and a maximum payload capacity of 8000kg. Multiple chambers with specialized vibrator, detonation system, hydraulic interfaces, and freezing capabilities facilitate studies addressing deep foundations, pollutant migration, explosion simulations, freezethaw effects, and dynamic loadings produced by explosions and earthquakes. During FY 98, the Centrifuge Research Center conducted experiments in pavements design, applications of the GRIZZLY mine plow, capping of dredged material to estimate rate of movement of contaminants, and effects of confining stress on soil liquefaction during earthquakes. In addition, experiments were conducted for two universities and cooperative research agreements with several other institutions are being developed. 44-28 U.S. ARMY TOPOGRAPHIC ENGINEERING CENTER BACKGROUND The mission of the U.S. Army Topographic Engineering Center (TEC) is to provide new topographic capabilities to the warfighter to ensure superior knowledge of the battlefield. TEC also provides new capabilities in geospatial science to the Civil Works (CW) community to ensure superior implementation of the Nation's civil and environmental initiatives. This mission is accomplished through research, development, and application of remote sensing, geographic information, global positioning, topographic, and information technologies. TEC is a widely recognized laboratory whose primary technologies relate to accurate, realistic, and timely depiction and visualization of the earth's surface for both military and non-military applications. With the increased emphasis on construction and infrastructure, and on the recovery, sustenance, and enhancement of the earth's life-support systems, it has become increasingly urgent to develop effective tools for geospatial data exploitation and environmental monitoring and control. To meet this challenge, TEC scientists and engineers have developed faster, more accurate, and cost-effective ways to use remote sensing technologies to describe, characterize, and analyze the surface of the earth. The tools and technologies that TEC provided for the rapid deployment and precise management of forces during Operation's Desert Shield and Desert Storm are being applied to civil environmental restoration and management today. Most recently, TEC brought advanced technologies and capabilities to the Bosnian peace negotiations held in Dayton, Ohio, as well as Belgrade, Yugoslavia, and is currently using new technologies to provide accurate terrain elevation data for the reconstruction of Bosnia's infrastructure. These are technologies whose feasibility have been proven and which may soon become operationally supportable for use in the CW community. The ultimate success of the Nation and the world to creatively meet the environmental and infrastructure challenges of tomorrow could well depend on the successful adaptation of technologies that TEC has developed, largely for combat military purposes, to existing and new civil program applications. In today's fast moving world, with information technology advancing at a rapid pace, people at all levels of the Nation's economy find themselves faced with ever increasing amounts of data and information. Avoiding "information overload" has become a major concern. TEC has addressed this concern head-on through its Performance Visualization efforts. The term, performance visualization, is used to reflect the importance and actualization of superior operational performance through the application of six appropriately chosen processes: * Data specification * Data acquisition * Database development * Data integration * Intuitive data representation, and * Static and dynamic visualization of operational space. Through the application of these six processes and the use of new information technology, TEC engineers and scientists are developing tools that present intuitive visual images of operational space, sometimes coupled with dynamic fly-through capability. Layered within the operating framework of this Performance Visualization System (PVS) are other forms of information that can be layered graphically or alphanumerically within the geospatial image presentation. The possible outgrowth from this intuitively visualized information integration is extensive, with applications in construction, infrastructure development, and resource management. And, when coupled with real-time Global Positioning Systems (GPS), PVS becomes a powerful tool in transportation, automated construction vehicle operation, and in transportation system ground and air traffic management. TEC's technologies provide the Nation with a "visual stethoscope" with which to diagnose and focus corrective action in assessing, maintaining, and enhancing our Nation's environmental health. TEC is responsible for integrating technologies that bridge the macroscopic view from air and space with the microscopic view on the ground. The exploitation of these visualization, spectral, and spatial data capabilities provides the Nation with very powerful tools for use in environmental monitoring and resource management, serving both our domestic needs and our global leadership role. TEC's ability to cost-effectively participate in the Corps' CW Program is enhanced by its extensive ongoing efforts in the development of remote sensing technologies for both military and non-military applications. These efforts include the following research and development activities: * Development of spatial data analysis tools, data integration and data transfer techniques * Automation of image registration techniques * Development of advanced image compression techniques * Multispectral image (MSI) and hyperspectral image (HSI) analysis * MSI/HSI enhanced software development * Development of one of the world's most extensive spectral signature databases * Computer-assisted stereo editing 45 - 1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 * Interfacing photogrammetry with computer vision * Rapid mapping using interferometric synthetic aperture radar (IFSAR) * Research in neural networks and wavelet transforms for HSI and IFSAR data processing and image classification * Change detection * Development of precise positioning systems * Terrain visualization, and * Extensive modeling and simulation. TEC, currently developing one of the world's most extensive spectral signature databases, including the techniques and tools to exploit it, offers remote sensing technologies that could form an essential part of a new national approach to infrastructure engineering and environmental management. These technologies include advanced, efficient methods of geospatial data collection and processing, as well as advanced methods of identifying environmental problems and trends on the earth's surface. These tools can already accurately characterize different surface conditions, including certain types and conditions of vegetation, soils, and surface water. With further development, these tools will provide operational support in an effort to monitor change in the biosphere, to indicate both the location of point and non-point pollution sources, as well as to advise of impending negative or positive trends. The extensive development of remote sensing technologies for use in construction, environmental rehabilitation, and resource management will give the Nation the research and operational tools it needs to increase its capabilities to accomplish tasks that might otherwise not be feasible, while at the same time performing existing tasks rapidly, accurately, and at the lowest possible cost. FY98 OPERATIONS AND RESULTS During FY98, TEC expanded its involvement and communications with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Headquarter's Emergency Operation Center (HQ-EOC) during civil crises. The Geospatial Engineering Branch continued providing support to the USACE CW activities in the geospatial data sciences. They also continued their support to the Department of the Interior's U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), and the Department of Commerce's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). These efforts included research and development efforts in survey quality control, measurement of structural deformations, underwater construction techniques, and terrain modeling; development of map-based data dissemination techniques; software development for geospatial data management; survey training; and Corps engineering documentation. Activities for other civil agencies included the following: * Surface water quality monitoring for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) * Cooperative wetlands and aquatic studies with the Virginia Institute of Marine Science (VIMS) and the EPA, and * South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Project for the USGS. Crisis/Special Products.Team As a result of TEC's expansion of its support to HQEOC, the Crisis/Special Products Division, which houses TEC's EOC, became directly involved with Corpssponsored missions and responses to emergency situations. Among other activities the following were provided: * Maps and imagery of the ValuJet airliner crash site in the Florida Everglades, and * Images of the landfall of Hurricane Fran along the Carolina Coast, and GIS products for the coastal areas of the landfall. Terrain and Environmental Analysis Team This team provides historical aerial photographic analyses of U.S. Military installations, formerly used defense sites (FUDS), and base realignment and closure (BRAC) sites. The analyses provide information on the location of potential environmental contamination sites (such as chemical disposal areas or landfills), potential unexploded ordnance (UXO) sites, and information on the potential influence of surface terrain features on contamination flow (historical photogeologic analysis). The types of analyses performed, historical or photogeologic, depends on the particular problem of the installation. In FY98, the team produced analyses for 21 sites in seven Corps Divisions. Commercial/Civil Imagery (C21) Procurement Services TEC's Geospatial Information Division (GID) was designated by the Office of the Assistant Chief of Engineers in 1990 to act as the U.S. Army's Commercial/ Civil Imagery (C2I) Acquisition monitor. This action was designed to prevent Army agencies/organizations from duplicating C2I data purchases. Efficient management of the research, acquisition, and distribution of imagery and products is increasingly important as U.S. Army units expand their use of this technology, especially with the fielding of the Digital Topographic Support System/Multispectral Imagery Processor (DTSS/MSIP). GID serves several functions in its role as monitor, as defined in a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) signed by the U.S. Army and U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) on 26 November 1990. These include acting as the U.S. Army's primary point-ofcontact for commercial/civil imagery sources to support engineer and terrain analysis operations and applications, acting as the monitor for all U.S. Army purchases of C2I, and serving as a repository of purchases and any scenes 45 - 2 U.S. ARMY TOPOGRAPHIC ENGINEERING CENTER available to Department of Defense (DoD) that are crucial to Army missions. GID) procures current and historical data for U.S. Army and DoD customers, with funding split between specified Army units when available, and with other monies provided by the customer. As the many planned future systems launch, all systems will be used for supporting DoD military and civil planning, training, operational, and humanitarian requirements. Global Positioning System (GPS) One of TEC's major accomplishments in recent years has been the development of the real-time centimeter level On-The-Fly (OTF) GPS. The OTF GPS system allows accurate real-time 3-D positioning of a moving vehicle. TEC demonstrated the first robust, reliable OTF system in the world to be publicly demonstrated with centimeter accuracy using GPS carrier phase measurements. TEC's pioneering work on OTF GPS has been exploited by the private sector and is now being introduced to the commercial world of water, land, and air navigation, and to OTF survey engineering. The GPS is a satellite navigation, timing, and ranging system developed by the Department of Defense (DOD). Highly efficient measurements of position can be made with GPS using several techniques, with accuracies ranging from meters to millimeters. TEC has successfully aided the Corps districts and divisions in the implementation of Differential GPS (DGPS) to the extent that they have great confidence in, and call frequently upon, the expertise of TEC. Assistance ranges from a variety of technical questions and training to helping in the establishment of regional and national implementation plans; thus, a great deal of time, effort, and funds have been saved. The additional work that TEC conducts in its interface with the large surveying community has aided tremendously in posturing TEC to represent the Corps in conducting work at this level. TEC has representatives working with the Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee (FGCS) and has been instrumental in the development of standards for GPS within the large federal community. In 1998, TEC conducted several efforts in the exploitation of high-accuracy DGPS. The study and development of techniques to use DGPS for deformation measurement of dams continued, with tests conducted on actual dams, producing sub-centimeter results. Procedures and algorithms are expected to reduce field data collection times by more than half, and require fewer personnel. High accuracy DGPS also was applied to tide measurements in the Jacksonville District. With the satellite-based system, time series measurements can be collected on anchored vessels, not just fixed structures, so that refined and more accurate datum models can be produced. With the digital model and DGPS on a survey vessel or dredge, tide data are collected accurately and automatically during construction activities, eliminating the need for gage readings and producing more consistent results between Corps vessels and contractors. TEC continued to use OTF GPS in support of the South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Initiative. This cooperative effort with the U.S. Geological Survey involves collection of accurate elevation data over broad areas in support of accurate flow models. The accuracy and versatility of OTF GPS enables data collection on vehicles, air boats, helicopters, and survey personnel, which enables surveys throughout the diverse habitat. In 1998, TEC used DGPS for quality control and to ensure consistency of data previously collected. Hydrographic Survey and Waterway Construction Work continued on gaining experience andknowledge of multibeam sonar systems and their ability to meet the requirements of the Corps hydrographic surveying activities. The results from the studies will be incorporated into the USACE EM 1110-2-1003, Hydrographic Surveying. TEC continued R&D efforts in positioning and placement of underwater structures. These efforts enable efficient and feasible float-in construction of navigation locks and other large components that will greatly reduce such costs. A positioning system and procedure was tested and demonstrated on a lock structure in the Pittsburgh District with favorable results. TEC also worked with the Savannah District and a hydrographic survey systems contractor to develop a multibeam system that can survey in suspended sediments. Such bottom conditions have always had difficult acoustic properties, which produce inaccurate and unreliable survey results. As a result of the tests and modification of the signal processing algorithms, improved results were seen. TEC addressed the problem of processing extremely large terrain datasets. Multibeam and LIDAR hydrographic survey systems are producing hundreds of thousands, even millions, of data points that are too large for processing or require excessive time. Working with the National Institute of Standards and Technology, TEC investigated algorithms to selectively thin data points in flat or constant slope areas, while leaving points in or near features. The result is a method that significantly reduces the number of points with negligible reduction in accuracy. Web-Based Geographic Information Systems (GIS) TEC is developing a series of interactive GIS systems to enhance the operational capabilities of the Corps' CW districts and to better inform the user groups of Corps projects. Digital Project Notebook (DPN) TEC was tasked by Corps Headquarters in FY97 to 45 - 3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 develop a GIS-based database of information on all Corps of Engineers CW projects. Previously, each district produced an annual book of maps and description pages for each project. To produce the DPN, approximately 2,500 map sheets were scanned, accompanying description pages were digitized, and the information was coordinated with each of 38 districts. The data were combined with a customized version of a commercial GIS to enable queries of all projects based on geographic area, project type, funding, and Congressional district. In FY98, the CD product was replaced with a Web application that similarly displays projects on a map, and enables map queries; however, the Web DPN enables more data display since the application is not limited by the CD. The Web DPN also is linked to other pertinent Web sites, which greatly expands the amount of information that can be presented. The DPN is available to anyone with access to the Internet. National Inventory of Dams TEC performed an update in 1998 of the National Inventory of Dams, a biennial task previously conducted by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The task involved collection of data from all 50 states, Puerto Rico, and 16 Federal agencies; totaling 87,000 dams. TEC received the data in a variety of formats, compiled and analyzed the information for errors and discrepancies, and conferred with 34 states on their data. TEC will publish the inventory in the following year using a Web-based GIS interface, similar to the DPN application. Software Development TEC continued to update and provide support for several software packages including CORPSCON, the popular coordinate transformation package. At least one call per day was fielded on CORPSCON, 75 percent of which were from non-federal users. To minimize the impact of these requests, and to make software as widely available as possible, an Internet web page was developed. TEC developed software to assist Corps districts with planning and quality control of surveys. The software provides information on techniques, contracting procedures, and standards to ensure surveys are properly scoped and conducted according to the task. TEC also developed software for the Walla Walla District for dredge cost estimating. The Web-based application enables district and contractor personnel to access standard cost formulas and scope dredging tasks. Training TEC's Geospatial Engineering Branch provided lead instructors for Corps training courses in Advanced Surveying, GPS Surveying, Hydrographic Surveying, and GPS for geographic information system (GIS) data collection. Vegetation Mapping TEC has been working cooperatively with the Ft. A.P. Hill staff in researching remote sensing-based techniques for determination of forest structural variables and assessment of training land impacts. The funding source has been the CIA's Environmental Intelligence Applications Program (EIAP), established to take intelligence-related imagery research results and apply them to environmental problems. Extensive field data has been acquired and will be used for training, testing, and validation of high resolution multispectral image and National Technical Means sources. The project employs a multidisciplined team of researchers who apply, analyze, and interpret GPS, image processing, and GIS technologies. Predictive model development intended for inferring forest variables is in progress with testing and validation to follow. Related geostatistical R&D are occurring at the Ft. A.P. Hill study site. Successful application of project results will result in an improved terrain feature generation capability for DoD at home and abroad. Spectral Research and Environmental Applications Environmental studies being conducted by the Remote Sensing Technology Division include collaborative studies with other agencies. Collaboration leverages the Division's in-house spectroradiometric measurements, digital multispectral video, and multi/hyperspectral (MSI/HSI) image processing capabilities with other agency and private industry capabilities. Shared scientific interests and data are primary objectives. Acquired data and experience have dual use for meeting civil and military intelligence and environmental requirements. The Topographic Research Division/Terrain Signature Analysis Branch is developing a database that will catalogue more than 5,000 different spectral signatures compiled by TEC, as well as signatures from other organizations. The database incorporates visible/near infrared fluorescence and thermal spectra obtained from field, laboratory, and imagery measurement. Upon completion, the database will have multiple scientific tools for viewing data and performing numerical and statistical analysis. The distributed system will house the database and scientific tools on different servers and possibly different platforms. The system structure will be transparent to the user who will access the data over the Internet via web browser or similar interface. South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Project: Using Digital Multispectral Videography (DMSV) to Model Vegetative Resistance to Flow A cooperative research study between TEC and the USGS's National Mapping and Water Resources Division integrated ground spectral reflectance data and 45-4 narrow band DMSV to characterize vegetation in the Everglades. As part of the South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Project, TEC and USGS performed research to conclude whether DMSV could be used to develop vegetation roughness models that would provide a way to determine vegetative resistance to flow. This research is part of a larger effort to determine vegetative resistance to flow in the Everglades. Environmental/Vegetation Stress TEC conducted greenhouse and preliminary field spectrofluorescence studies of plants doped with specific heavy metals. Wetlands/Aquatic Studies Cooperative studies between TEC, VIMS, and the EPA were conducted of wetland environments in Northern Virginia, using DMSV and ground-based spectroradiometric measurements. REPORTS AND DOCUMENTATION The following reports were completed in FY98: . Highlight paper for the Journal of the American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. 63, no. 3, Mar. 1997, in support of USGS South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Project, Reflectance Calibrated Digital Multispectral Video: A Test Bed for High Spectral and Spatial Resolution Remote Sensing (TEC and USGS). . Memorandum Report, Tidal Relations Along the St. Mary's Entrance Channel to Kings Bay, Fernandina, FL. . TEC-0103, Field Calibration Procedures for Multibeam Sonar Systems. . Canadian Hydrographic Conference, Applications of Multibeam Sonar Surveys in USA CE. . Short-Term Analysis Service, Deformable World-Problems and Solutions. . Short-Term Analysis Service, Preliminary Investigation in the Use of GPS for Structural Deformation Surveying. 45 - 5 THE WATER RESOURCES SUPPORT CENTER The Water Resources Support Center (WRSC) is a field operating agency under the staff supervision of the Director of Civil Works, Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The Center consists of the Hydrologic Engineering Center, the Institute for Water Resources, the Navigation Data Center, and support elements. It is located at the Humphreys Engineer Center, Alexandria, Virginia, with satellite elements at other locations, including the Hydrologic Engineering Center in Davis, California; and the Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center, part of the Navigation Data Center, in New Orleans, Louisiana. The accomplishments of WRSC during FY98 are listed by division. HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER (HEC) Top priorities for FY98 were the NexGen software research and development project, the Water Control Data System (WCDS) modernization corporate software development and integration project, watershed and water resource system analysis, and large-scale flood frequency studies. Progress was substantial in all these areas. Customer demand for HEC services and products continues to be high. Several large reimbursable projects resulted in HEC fiscal status at year-end at an all-time high. The professional staff remained stable with minor turnover. The NexGen software research and development project continues at a brisk pace. The project is developing and fielding software tools to help Corps professionals perform their work better, more efficiently, and with increased ease. We now have released to field offices and the public, maiden release of the River Analysis System - HEC-RAS, followed by several major updates, the latest Version 2.2 is the final steady flow version; maiden Version 1.0 of the Hydrologic Modeling System - HEC-HMS; and maiden Version 1.0 of the Flood Damage Analysis package - HEC-FDA. Work has now begun in earnest on expanding HEC-RAS for unsteady flow; the first release is planned for the end of FY99. An updated release of HEC-HMS is planned for FY99 that will include enhancements to the spatial precipitation and runoff modeling capability, continuous soil moisture accounting, and release of a snow melt adjunct software capability under development in cooperation with the Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory. The HEC-FDA is undergoing improvement with a new release planned for FY99. New statistical uncertainty analysis, improved data base operations, GIS capability, and a number of enhanced user features will be additions for the new release. A beta version of a new reservoir operation program emphasizing real-time decision support was completed and is included in the suite of WCDS software. A focused project to modernize the Water Control Data System (WCDS) software began in FY97. WCDS is the Corps decision support Automated Information Systems (AIS) that serves the Corps water management mission. It embodies data acquisition, manipulation and management; forecasting, simulation and decision support analysis; and information dissemination. Modernizing the corporate software for WCDS is a five year, five million dollar centrally PRIP funded, Corps AIS improvement project managed under the Corps Life Cycle management of Information Systems (LCMIS) process. The management structure and design teams form a unique arrangement for providing oversight and field participation in the enterprise-wide development and integration project. A significant accomplishment in FY98 includes completion of a fully functional, but limited capability, version 1.0 prototype incorporating aspects of all eight components comprising the modernized WCDS. The prototype and other project documents are available on the project (http://cw71. cw-wc.usace.army.mil/cwcinfo/cwc.html). Planning was accomplished for deployment of Version 1.0 early in FY99 at four selected field office sites. Work supporting implementation of risk-based analysis for flood damage reduction studies continued at a steady but reduced pace this past year. In the previous six years, eleven PROSPECT courses, fifteen on-site workshops and a number of executive and field project working sessions were held for a total of about 1250 Corps professionals. PROSPECT courses will continue at about one per year in risk-based analysis. HEC-FDA, the new software package written to support this initiative, is now in widespread use by Corps offices. A lessons-learned seminar was held the first quarter of FY98; proceedings have been published. Risk-based analysis for flood damage reduction studies is now routinely applied by the Corps. A National Academy of Sciences panel is scheduled to review the Corps use of risk-based analysis beginning in early FY99 and HEC will be supporting that activity. 46-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY98 Six PROSPECT courses were conducted for a total of six weeks of training. The courses covered several hydrologic engineering and planning analysis topics. Attendance averaged about 25 students per course. Twelve on-site workshops were also held totaling seven weeks of sessions for 325 students. This continued the recent trend of reduced PROSPECT sign-ups and increased requests for on-site workshops. Topics presented included WCDS real-time working sessions, HEC-RAS, HEC-HMS, risk-based analysis, and reservoir operations/HEC-5. Reimbursable project work was undertaken for 19 Corps field offices as well as HQUSACE, the Institute for Water Resources, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Federal Regulatory Commission, National Institute for Building Sciences, a combine ofthe State of California and Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, and the University of California, Davis. Projects include watershed and reservoir system modeling, water quality, risk-based analysis, river hydraulics, wetlands hydrology, water control management, regional statistical analysis, flood damage analysis, and groundwater modeling. We continued the several years of commitment to the Alabama-Coosa- Tallapoosa, Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint (ACT/ACF) surface water and water quality modeling projects. A critical achievement was the signing of an Interstate Compact by the parties, based in-part on the modeling studies. Several high profile flood frequency studies are being supported on the American River in California, the Des Moines River in Iowa, and the upper Mississippi River. The Bulletin 17B (Federal guidelines for flood frequency) work group and a cadre of university and industry experts are serving as technical advisors to the upper Mississippi flood frequencies project under HEC management. Two major water resource system analysis projects were begun late in the year: data compilation and simulation and optimization models for the Sacramento/San Joaquin rivers flood control systems; and data management and simulation and optimization models for the Panama Canal Expansion study. The total reimbursable program was about $1.7 million with individual projects ranging from a few thousand dollars to over $300 thousand. We expect the HEC program for FY99 will continue FY98 efforts at the increased pace reflected at the end of the year. We will continue fielding new versions of the NexGen software packages HEC-RAS, HEC-HMS, and HEC-FDA, test version of the new reservoir simulation program, and initial unsteady flow capability of HECRAS. Version 1.0 of the modernized WCDS will be fielded in four Corps offices. PROSPECT training will remain at about six courses and field workshops will likely continue to increase. Research and Development funding is expected to modestly increase, software maintenance and support and WCDS modernization funding remain at FY98 levels, and reimbursable technical assistance and special projects continue the upward trend. On balance, the result is expected to be an increase in funding over that of 1998. The reorganization that was expected to impact HEC mentioned in the FY97 Annual Report has not yet occurred. Our status is still uncertain, but we are continuing our activities without negative impact, and do not expect to be adversely affected when the change eventually occurs. INSTITUTE FOR WATER RESOURCES (IWR) Technical Analysis and Research Division The Technical Analysis and Research Division responds to water planning research needs of the field offices, as well as unique projects assigned by the Office of the Chief of Engineers. At the same time, technical assistance is provided to Corps field divisions and districts. Engineers and scientists in the division apply specialized knowledge in fields such as economics, environmental science, geography and engineering to develop a broad range of methods aimed at producing practical and effective planning and decision support tools. Outputs are applied to water resources activities throughout the Corps. During FY98, the Technical Analysis and Research Division performed analyses and provided technical assistance to Corps districts on environmental restoration evaluation, risk analysis, and planning methodologies. An "Illustrated Handbook of Bioengineering Techniques" was produced for planners. Methods development continued to develop models and techniques for watershed planning approaches. Included is work to define a role for Corps planners to facilitate watershed planning, including collaborative problem solving planning techniques for Corps studies and to explore and assess multi-objective planning approaches. Methods to better engage all stakeholders in the planning process has been initiated. Also, continuing are efforts to refine guidelines and develop PC software for cost effectiveness and 46-2 THE WATER RESOURCES SUPPORT CENTER incremental cost analysis for environmental projects. The software and guidelines serve as a basis for generic guidance for evaluating water resources project contributions to fish and wildlife habitat. The division manages the collection, management and analysis of the Corps flood damage data collection program. This program will reduce the time and cost of developing acceptable projects to reduce the costs flooding. Other activities of the division include provision of technical assistance to a number of field offices to implement risk analysis in waterway transportation, project operations and management studies, and flood damage prevention projects. Technical assistance and training was provided to several Corps offices and other agencies on the application of the cost effectiveness model (IWR-PLAN) and on the planning process. The division provided major contributions to the interagency "Stream Corridor Restoration Handbook" and training course. Policy and Special Studies Division The Policy and Special Studies Division carries out its mission in support of the Director of Civil Works by conducting policy analysis, planning and studies of national and regional scope. Since 1976, the program has contributed to the development of numerous policies and programmatic initiatives within the Civil Works Directorate. The program continues to serve the Corps by assessing and evaluating changing national and regional water and natural resources uses and management and related public works infrastructure management needs as they affect Corps Civil Works missions, policies, practices, legislative mandates, and executive directives. During FY98, the Division conducted 24 policy studies in direct support of the HQ Policy Division. In addition to the policy studies program, special studies of national and regional scope were undertaken that built on the policy directives and research tools which were developed at IWR. Among the noteworthy national special studies undertaken in FY98 were the Devil's Lake, ND Flood Mitigation Analysis and the Upper Mississippi River Flow Frequency Study. Other major activities conducted during FY98 included the following programs and projects that proved to be of immediate use: * Clean Water Action Plan * Evaluation of Non-structural Flood Reduction Alternatives for WRDA 98 * Western Drought Coordination Council * Guidance for Watershed Planning * Field Guidance Handbook for Brownfields Planning * Water Supply Handbook * Issues in Adaptive Environmental Management * Revised Policy Digest * Civil Works Programs Brochure * American Heritage Rivers During the year, permanent staff personnel were joined by visiting scholars from leading universities in the country. Visiting scholars work full time in the Division offices or visit from time to time during their appointments. They contribute to a large number of policy and special studies and upon their return to teaching, their academic programs are enriched by exposure to information they learn while working for the Corps. Overall, the Division staff and visiting scholars have a significant influence on the state of current knocwledge, from papers presented at various workshops and conferences, as well as publications in peer-reviewed journals. Navigation Analysis Division The Navigation Analysis Division provides support for the Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (HQUSACE), and field divisions and districts for project-specific and system studies of navigation improvements. In this regard, it also performs recurring national-level analyses such as the update of vessel operating costs for inland and deep draft waterways, development of coastal harbor and inland segment commodity, traffic and fleet forecasts, and analysis of the recovery of navigation costs. It also provides program management support for the Inland Waterways Users Board and performs national and special studies as directed by HQUSACE. Major activities include the following projects and studies: Continuing Support Activities: The foundation for evaluation ofnavigation projects, both inland waterway and deep draft harbors, is the comparison of transportation costs with and without proposed improvements. As part of the USACE Transportation Systems Program, the division maintains and annually updates data on ocean and inland water vessel operating costs, the dimensions of these vessels, the distribution of ocean vessel sizes in the world fleet, and the configuration of barge tows on inland waterways. Coordination of Navigation Studies: The Inland Waterways Users Board (IWUB), created by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, is charged with advising Congress on priorities for improving inland 46-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY98 waterways. To provide information desired by the IWUB and by the Army, the division performs ongoing analysis of construction and funding schedules for navigation projects on the fuel-taxed inland waterways system. This analysis incorporates the USACE and IWUB priority evaluations of inland navigation projects in accordance with the budget constraints imposed by the Trust Fund. Ongoing Studies: * National Dredging Needs Study (Section 402 of the WRDA of 1992) * Transportation Systems Program * Support on the Implementation of Components of the Operations and Maintenance Program Plan of Improvement * Program Management Support on Activities of the Inland Waterways Users Board * Development of Risk-Based Methods to apply to the Evaluation of Deep Draft Navigation Projects * Impacts of Navigation Trends on Channel Usage and Design * Economic Evaluation of North Carolina Beaches after Hurricane Fran * Analysis of USACE Dredging Quantities and Costs * Analysis of Inland Navigation Project Construction Schedules and Financial Status of Inland Waterways Trust Fund * Regional Economic Impact Analysis for the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway Navigation Study; Missouri River Master Plan Study; and Inner Harbor Navigational Lock Replacement Study. * Development of Risk-Based Methods to apply to the Evaluation of Deep Draft Navigation Projects * Navigation Analysis for the Lower Snake River Juvenile Salmon Migration Study Recent Products: * Navigation Operation and Maintenance: Expenditures for Harbors and Waterways FY97 * The Importance of the U.S. Port System * Risk- Based Analysis for Deep Draft Navigation: Benefit and Cost Overview * The 1997 Inland Waterway Review * Annual Report to Congress on the Status of the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund for FY97 * Shallow Draft Navigation Analysis, Apalachicola- Ch attahoochee-Flint(ACF)/Alabama-Coosa- Allapoosa (ACT) * FY98 Deep Draft Vessel Operating and Replacement Costs * FY97 Shallow Draft Vessel Operating and Replacement Costs * Economic Guidance on the Methodology for Computing NED Benefits to Navigation for Cruise Ships * Navigation: The Role of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Desk Reference Notebook) * Analysis of Inland Waterway Construction Schedules Based on the FY99 Budget Request Program Analysis Division The Program Analysis Division (PAD) provides analytical support for improving the effectiveness and efficiency of Civil Works (CW) program execution through the conduct of program analysis and evaluation studies, development of analytical budgeting tools, and through performance measurement systems design. The division provides an analytical support base and infrastructure outside the day-to-day press of headquarters' activities in order to enable programmatic issues to be addressed comprehensively and systematically. Working with headquarters clients, PAD project managers collect, analyze and assess data on Civil Works program performance, structure information to assist decision making, manage task forces, and develop program management tools and processes. During FY98, the primary clients of the division were Programs Management Division; Operations, Construction and Readiness Division; and Planning Division. Representative projects include the following efforts: CW Results Initiative: PAD is managing the development of results-oriented performance measures and goals for Civil Works responsive to Corps needs and consistent with the intent of the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA). GPRA requires Federal agencies to develop strategic plans, to set performance goals focused on program results, and to develop objective indicators to measure performance in attaining these goals. The project proponent is Programs Management Division, but all CW divisions as well as the Secretary's office are participating in the initiative. Accomplishments include: completion of the FY98 performance plan for submission to OMB detailing FY99 performance goals, and the preparation of a concept plan for revision of HQ Program Review Board (PRB) incorporating the Results Initiative business program structure. This plan was adopted, and the PRB is now organized around this concept. PAD is currently supporting an effort to revise the Command Management Review (CMR), the corporate performance management forum, to include strategic as well as execution performance measures related to Corps programs and strategic objectives. This effort 46-4 THE WATER RESOURCES SUPPORT CENTER builds on the Civil Works results-oriented measurement philosophy to promote the development of outcomeoriented performance measures. Advancement of Project Management Techniques: The objective of this research program is to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of the practice of project management in the Corps of Engineers. Each work unit in the program is oriented to providing useable tools, techniques, databases, procedures, concepts and methods to improve the management of the project delivery process. During FY98, efforts focused on preparing for the application of earned value project management (EVPM) in the field. A pilot project in the Albuquerque district was initiated to demonstrate the use of EVPM with the existing set of Corps project management systems and tools, including PROMIS and CEFMS. A major effort was also initiated to research and develop a practical approach to achieving customer satisfaction using existing project planning and management tools. An internet web site to serve as a project management support and learning center was designed and put into development. This site will contain general project management information and resources as well as specifics on earned value and customer satisfaction. Planning Virtual Resource Center: Based on recommendations in the study of Planning Chiefs Views on Use of Centers of Expertise in Planning (96- R-19), PAD began development of a web-based resource center for Civil Works planners. The prototype was demonstrated in the Spring '97 Planning Chiefs' Conference and was well received. A betamodel is on the web, and is being tested and upgraded. Web Technology Workgroups: PAD is studying virtual teaming strategies for workgroups. Focus areas include the identifying and evaluating of technology resources, researching teaming dynamics, and studying the integration of technology into team processes. Native American Intergovernmental Relations Assessment: PAD sponsored an implementation conference bringing the field, OASA(CW), and HQ together to assess the need for further efforts to implement task force recommendations. A decision was made to produce a video for commanders and executives. PAD produced a script for the video. Analysis of incident reports: PAD performed a statistical analysis of incident reports of criminal activity at Corps projects, and completed a letter report on findings. This report is being used by an operations task force charged with visitor safety improvement. Civil Works Management Tool- QUADRANT--- PAD continued the development of Corps civil works management tool by further research on QUADANT with creation and field-testing of another version of model called HYDRO-QUAD. The purpose of HYDRO-QUAD is to assist Corps hydroelectric managers with budgetary decisions about maintenance and repair items on hydropower facilities. Assistance to Office of Assistant Secretary of Army for Installations, Logistics, & Environment (I,L &E)-- PAD provided support to I,L&E through the conduct of two workshops on issue of improving partnerships between DOD agencies and other federal agencies whose lands are being used for Defense-related purposes or are impacted by DOD activities. Joint Corps of Engineers/American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA) Workshop-PAD conducted a workshop with AAPA and published results of this meeting. The results are being used to help AAPA and Corps more easily facilitate cost-sharing agreements and solve a number of port-related environmental issues. THE NAVIGATION DATA CENTER (NDC) The Navigation Data Center's (NDC) primary mission is to collect and supply information on the infrastructure, utilization and performance of the United States waterways and associated ports. NDC directly supports the USACE navigation, regulatory, emergency and readiness functions as well as those of other Federal, state and local agencies with roles or interests in water transportation. The Office of Management and Budget has designated the USACE, acting through NDC, as the Federal Central Collection Agency for waterborne commerce and vessel activities and waterway infrastructure data and statistics. As the Federal central source, NDC continued its intra- and interagency coordination program during FY98, including standardization efforts to align with DoD's Defense Data Dictionary System (DDDS) and the Corps Command Data Model. To insure Corps interoperability and minimize data entry, NDC initiated a linkage between NDC data and the Corps financial data system to produce quality, timely, performance measures, such as cost per ton of commerce moved. This initiative, called the Operation and Maintenance Business Information Link 46-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY98 (OMBIL) project, assists the Corps transition to business oriented management. Benefits were realized in FY98, still in the early stages of this effort, by the ability to link and layer navigation information to gain a more comprehensive understanding of navigation issues. NDC supports data users by supplying information in both standard and custom products. NDC maximizes the use of electronic distribution of information via the internet and by combining data and reports on one annual CD-ROM. Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center (WCSC) The WCSC continued to provide annual preliminary and final U.S foreign and domestic vessel, vessel activity and commercial traffic products, plus monthly tonnage estimates, on the internet in order to furnish both the government and the public more accessible and more timely information concerning waterborne commerce statistics. During FY98, the system for automated collection of foreign vessel movements data was implemented in the major Customs Ports. This system, a partnership between Customs and the Corps, now generates over 75% of the vessel movement records in automated form. The data is now edited at the data input site offering more accurate, more complete, and more timely data at a reduced cost. In addition, for the first time in 50 years, the Corps is now acquiring U.S. dockspecific foreign vessel movement data comparable to the domestic vessel movement level of specificity. During 1998 WCSC assumed the function of processing foreign in-transit data, formerly performed by the U.S. Census Bureau. WCSC now produces statistics on waterborne commerce moving from one foreign country to another foreign country via a U.S. water port. WCSC, in partnership with the U.S. Maritime Administration, began parallel testing of the processing of U.S. foreign waterborne transportation statistics, in anticipation of the Office of Management and Budget transferring this function to the Corps effective 1 October 1998. Ports and Waterways Division In FY98 four reports were completed, distributed and available for sale: Port Series (PS) Number 8 - Philadelphia, PA; Camden, NJ; Wilmington, DE; and Ports on Delaware River; PS No. 18 - Mobile. AL; PS No. 19 - Panama City and Pensacola, FL; Pascagoula and Gulfport, MS; and Ports on the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers; and PS No. 37 - Port Angeles, Port Townsend, Everett, Anacortes, and Bellingham, WA. In addition to the completed reports, field surveys were completed and data entered into the Ports and Waterways Information Management System (PWIMS) database for port areas covered in the following reports: #PS No. 5 - New York, NY, and NJ, and Ports on Long Island; PS No. 27 - SanDiego, CA; PS No. 50 Ports of Hawaii (Honolulu, Kahului, Nawiliwili, Port Allen, Kaunakakai, Kaumalapau, Hilo, and Kawaihae; and PS No. 64 - Ports on Tennessee River, Tennessee-Tombigbee and Black Warrior-Tombigbee Waterways, and Alabama River. The Ports and Waterways Division has initiated the migration to an ORACLE relational database with the development of a prototype database structure and tests for functionality. When operational, data can be accessed and used by the Corps, DoD and other Federal agencies with only a web browser. The use of this technology will enable effective data transfer and improve agency efficiency in meeting their mission. Lock Performance Monitoring System (LPMS) The LPMS continued to enhance its distribution media via the internet to include lock characteristics data and monthly updates of national key indicator locks around the country. This now provides instantaneous Corps and public access to the LPMS and physical lock characteristics data. A major focus is to insure that LPMS will support the Operation and Maintenance resultsoriented management, performance measurements, and link with the OMBIL initiative. A major accomplishment was the linkage of lock output data with Corps financial data to provide efficiency performance measurement. Dredging Statistics Program The Dredging Statistics Program has begun the migration of the dredging database into ORACLE. The database structure has been developed and an alpha and bata testing phase of database functionality and ease of use completed. Data entry and report generation will be accomplished via the Corps Intranet and enable all Corps members access to the information in the central system. The database continues to meet user needs with monthly updates of Corps and contract dredging information made available on the public internet web site. In addition to the standard Advertising and Contract Awards reports, custom reports or data files are quickly generated to meet user requests. The database is a feeder system to OMBIL supplying Corps and contract dredging information. The database remains a reliable central information source used by the Corps, the dredging industry and other agencies as a baseline or supporting information for numerous studies and investigations. The Corps-only dredging news group is widely used to promote discussions and information exchange on dredging and related issues among all Corps districts and divisions. 46-6 INTERNATIONAL NAVIGATION ASSOCIATION (PIANC) The International Navigation Congresses (PIANC) is an international organization consisting of approximately 40 national members. From its headquarters in Brussels, Belgium, it acts as a clearinghouse of technology and experiences relating to ocean and inland navigation improvements which are exchanged among engineers, scientists, port operators, and marina and vessel owners, to name a few. Its objective, broadly stated, is to promote the worldwide progress of inland and maritime navigation through the exchange of technical information on port and waterway development. The objective of the Association is met by holding International Congresses and by publishing quarterly technical bulletins and special reports. Special reports are published describing the results of the work of international research teams, or working groups, composed of those national members interested in the particular subject under study. Examples include methods of treatment and disposal of dredged material, flexible revetments in the marine environment, an international survey of dry dock facilities and their characteristics, the wildlife habitat and port management, standards for recreation navigation waterways, and various other topics relating to port and waterway development. The organization also serves as an excellent source of identifying individual and corporate expertise throughout the world on PIANC-related subjects. Personal interchange of ideas and information also is promulgated by members attending the International Congresses held once every four years, and technical working group meetings held several times each year. The affairs of the Association are managed by a Permanent International Commission (PIC), composed of delegates who represent each member government. The number of delegates is determined by the size of the national membership, but may not exceed 11 per country. The United States (U.S.) has been a member of PIANC since 1902 and provides an annual appropriation for the support and maintenance of the organization. This includes an annual subvention to PIANC International and payment of a portion of the travel expenses of officially appointed national delegates (Commissioners) of the United States to meetings of the PIC and Congresses. Total annual appropriation for the U.S. Section, PIANC is currently $45,000, including the annual subvention of approximately $13,000 to PIANC International. The U.S. Section is administered by law, under the auspices of the Department of the Army (Corps of Engineers). It is located in the Water Resources Support Center, Casey Building, Humphreys Engineer Center. The U.S. Section is composed of both individual and corporate members who pay membership dues. Membership of the U.S. Section on September 30, 1997 totaled 335, consisting of 275 individual members, 60 corporate members and 3 student members. United States National Conunmmission The United States National Commission constitutes the governing body of the National Section. At the beginning of FY98 the ex-officio offices of the U.S. National Commission were: Chairman (Dr. John H. Zirschky, Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army (CW)); President (MG Russell L. Fuhrman, Director of Civil Works); and Secretary (Mr. Thomas M. Ballentine). On June 9, 1998, the Senate confirmed The Honorable Joseph W. Westphal as the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works), and he became the Chairman of the U. S. Section of PIANC. At the beginning of FY98, U.S. National Commissioners were: Mr. Robert D. Nichol, President, Moffatt and Nichol Engineers; Mr. Kurt J. Nagle, President, American Association of Port Authorities; Mr. Donald G. Waldon, Vice President representing the Central Region of the U. S. Section and Administrator, Tennessee Tombigbee Waterway Development Authority; Dr. Anatoly B. Hochstein, Director, George Washington/Louisiana State University (GW/LSU) Ports and Waterways Institute; Mr. Charles F. Lehman, Vice President, American Commercial Barge Line Company (Retired); Mr. John M. Pisani, Maritime Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation; Mr. Walter D. Ritchie, Vice President representing the Western Region of the U. S. Section and Principal, WDR and Associates; and Mr. Joseph J. Birgeles, Vice President representing the Eastern Region of the U. S. Section and a Principal of B&B Marine Consultants. After serving as Treasurer of the U.S. Section for over ten years, Mr. Lyle C. McLaren, Jr., retired. He was presented the Commander's Award for Public Service by Major General Russell L. Fuhrman, President, at a meeting of the U.S. National Commission in April 1998. 47-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY98 The new Treasurer, who took office in April, is Captain James R. Carman, retired, Chief, Division of Port and Intermodal Planning, and Office of Port and Domestic Shipping in the Maritime Administration. Conferences The U. S. Section sponsored its annual conference in October 1997, and co-sponsored with the American Society of Civil Engineers the eighth specialty conference in the PORTS Series. PORTS '98 was held March 12- 15, 1998, in Long Beach, CA. Mr. Lloyd M. Coakley, a Civil Engineer, in the St. Louis District received the U.S. Section Willems Award from MG Russell L. Fuhrman for a paper entitled "R.A.P.I.D Engineering, Design and Management on the Mississippi River." Earlier in the year, the North Carolina State Ports Authority was the host for the U. S. Section conference which was held in Wilmington, NC. Presentations were made by 40 speakers who developed the conference theme of the Maritime Industry in Transition: Issues, Challenges and Solutions for the 21st Century. The conference was organized by Mr. Erik Stromberg, Executive Director, North Carolina State Ports Authority and a former U. S. National Commissioner. The U. S. Section also participated in several other conferences which were sponsored by navigation organizations. The Association continued the long tradition of holding a PIANC session at the annual meeting of the National Waterways Conference, Inc. The presentation at the PIANC Breakfast in, New Orleans, LA. was on "Photogrammetry and Flood Fighting". The speaker was Mr. Dennis D. Morgan, civil engineer with the St. Louis District of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. The 29th International Navigation Congress was held from September 6-11, 1998, in The Hague, The Netherlands. The U.S. Section submitted eight national papers for presentation and publication in the proceedings of the Congress. An individual paper by Dr. Dennis P. Robinson and Dr. Harry J. Kelejian was selected by the international jury. This is the first time PIANC has accepted individual papers for presentation at a Congress. Dr. Robinson, an employee of the U.S. Army Institute for Water Resources, presented the paper. Dr. Kelejian is a professor at the University of Maryland, College Park. Mr. Hollis H. Allen, Botanist with the Waterways Experiment Station, Environmental Laboratory, presented a paper entitled, "Bioengineering with Geotextiles in Coastal and Riverine Environments in the United States" to an international conference on geotextiles and geomembranes in Rhiems, France in October 1997. Representatives to Permanent Committees and Commissions Two committee representatives who have served the U. S. Section well for a number of years retired during the year. Major General Russell L. Fuhrman presented the Commander's Award for Public Service to Mr. Thorndike Saville, Jr. and to Mr. Anson G. Eickhorst. Mr. Eickhorst represented the Section on the Permanent Technical Committee I for eight years. Mr. Saville represented the Section on the Permanent Technical Committee II for seven years. Both members have also made other significant contributions of time and expert knowledge at both and the national and the international levels of the Association. The U.S. Section representatives to the Permanent Technical Committees I and II (PTC I & II), the Permanent Environmental Commission (PEC) and the Permanent Committee for Development and Cooperation (PCDC), were as follows: Permanent Environmental Commission -- Dr. Robert M. Engler, USACE Waterways Experiment Station. Permanent Committee for Development and Cooperation -- Dr. Anatoly B. Hochstein, GW/ LSU Ports and Waterways Institute. Permanent Technical Committee I (PTC I )(Inland Waterways and Ports) -- Mr. Anson Eickhorst, Executive Assistant to the District Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer District, St. Louis. Replacing Mr. Eickhorst is Dr. Sandra K. Knight, P.E., USACE. Waterways Experiment Station. Permanent Technical Committee II (PTC II) (Maritime Ports and Seaways) -- Mr. Thorndike Saville, Jr. (Retired). Replacing Mr. Saville is Mr. Thomas H. Wakeman, III, Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. 47-2 INTERNATIONAL NAVIGATION ASSOCIATION (PIANC) Permanent Commission for Sport and Recreational Navigation (SRN) -- Mr. John M. Nichol (Retired) and Mr. Richard B. Dornhelm, Vice-President, Moffatt and Nichol Engineers. Technical Working Groups Established and Publication of Reports During the year six working groups completed their tasks and reports were published. Seven new working groups were approved. The titles of active working groups and the names of the U. S. Representatives are: PTC I WG 17, Handling and Treatment of Contaminated Dredged Material from Inland Ports and Waterways. Volume I published with Bulletin 89, 1996. In 1998 both Volumes I & II of the report was issued on a CD-ROM. The first PIANC publication issued in this form is available for purchase. Mr. Norman R. Francingues, Jr., USACE Waterways Experiment Station. PTC I WG 21, Economic Studies of Inland Waterways. Organized February 1996. Mr. David Grier, USACE, Institute for Water Resources. PTC I WG 22, Safety in Inland Navigation. Organized November 1996. RADM William T. McMullen, Texas A&M Galveston, Texas. PTC I WG 23, Technical and Economic Problems of Channel Icing. Organized December 1997. Mr. Claude Strauser, USACE District, St. Louis. PTC I WG 24, Vessel Traffic Management in the Inland Waterways. Organized March 1998. Mr. J. Michael Sollosi, U. S. Coast Guard. PTC II WG 33, Fenders. Organized January 1996. Mr. Mark T. Faeth, Han-Padron Associates. PTC II WG 34, The Effect of Earthquakes on Port Structures. Organized June 1996. Mr. Bradley P. Erickson, VZM TranSystem Corporation; Valery M. Buslov, Ph.D., Han-Padron Associates; and Stephen E. Dickenson,, Ph.D., Oregon State University. PTC II WG 35, Dangerous Goods in Ports (Handling, Storage and Transportation). Organized October 1996. PTC II WG 36, Catalogue of Precast Elements. Organized October 1996. Dr. Billy .L. Edge, Texas- A&M University. PTC H WG 37, Advances in Maritime Intermodal Freight Transportation. Organized September 1997. M. John Vickerman, VZM TranSystems Corporation. PTC II WG 38, Polar Navigation. Organized December 1997. Orson P. Smith, Ph.D., University of Alaska Anchorage. SRN WG 7, Marine Sanitation Pumpouts. Published with Bulletin 93, 1997. Mr. Edward F. McKiernan, President, SeaLand Technology, Inc. SRN WG 8, Standards for Pleasure Navigation Waterways. Organized August 1994. Robert M. Sorensen, Ph.D., Lehigh University. SRN WG 9, Regeneration of Harbour Areas for Sport and Pleasure Navigation Use. Organized July 1995. Mr. Jack C. Cox, Michael Baker Corporation. SRN WG 10, Provision for Low Cost Moorings for Seasonal Use. Organized July 1995. SRN WG 11, Waterway Planning for Marinas and Resorts. Organized February 1997. Mr,. Ron Stone, National Marine Manufactures Association. SRN WG 12, Recreational Navigation and Nature. Organized February 1998. Mr. Scott Jackson USACE Waterways Experiment Station and Paul E. Donheffner, Oregon State Marine Board. PEC WG 2, Wildlife Habitat and Port Management. Organized March 1995. Mary C. Landin, Ph.D. PEC WG 3, Glossary of Environmental Terms and Terminology as Related to PIANC Activities. Organized March 1995. Mr. Thomas R. Patin, USACE Waterways Experiment Station. PEC WG 4, Environmental Management System for Ports. Organized January 1996. Dr. Marcia Bystryn, Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. PEC WG 5, Environmental Guidelines for Marine, Nearshore and Inland Confined Disposal 47-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY98 Facilities for Contaminated Dredged Material. Organized January 1998. Michael C. Palermo, Ph.D., USACE Waterways Experiment Station and Mr. John C. Roberge, Ocean and Coastal Consultants, Inc. Dredging -- Just the Facts 47-4 INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY WATERS BOARDS In order to carry out United States obligations under international agreements, the Office of the Chief of Engineers and several Corps divisions and districts with jurisdiction over areas bordering Canada have numerous representation international boards, committees, and other groups. The majority of these boards were established by the International Joint Commission (IJC) as empowered in accordance with the provisions of the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909 between the United States and Great Britain (for Canada). IJC boards fall into two broad categories: boards of control, which are more or less permanent and supervise compliance over an IJC order; and engineering, technical, or study boards, which are usually dissolved after completing and reporting on an investigation assignment. In addition to boards created by the Commission, other international boards and committees are created by treaties or other arrangement in matters concerned with the water resources of joint interest, and the members report directly to the Governments or establishing agency. International boundary waters boards and committees having Corps of Engineers memberships during the fiscal year are listed in Table 48-1. For an explanation of the constitution of the various boards and committees, see the FY 77 and FY 80 annual reports, Volume II. TABLE 48-1 International Boundary Waters Boards Having Corps of Engineers Members BOARD NAME YEAR ESTABLISHED UNITED STATES REPRESENTATION Int. Int. Int. Int. Int. Lake Superior St. Croix River Lake of the Woods Lake Champlain Kootenay Lake 1914 1915 1925 1937 1938 1941 1943 6. Int. Rainy Lake 7. Int. Osoyoos Lake 8. Int. Niagara 9. Int. St Lawrence River 1953 1953 10. Int. Souris River 11. Int. Souris-Red Rivers Engineer 1959 1948 *Division Engineer, North Central Division *Division Engineer, New England Division *District Engineer St. Paul *District Engineer, New York *1. District Engineer, Seattle 2. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Boise, ID *District Engineer, St. Paul 1. District Engineer, Seattle *2. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Tacoma, WA 3. Washington State Parks & Recreation Commission, Olympia, WA *1. Division Engineer, North Central Division 2. Dept. of Energy, FERC, Wash., D.C. *1. Division Engineer, North Central Division 2. New York Dept. of Environmental Conservation 3. New York Power Authority 4. Rochester Institute of Technology 5. Private Citizen, Clayton, NY 1. District Engineer, St. Paul *2. ND State Engr., Bismark, ND 3. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Bismarck, ND 1. District Engineer, St. Paul *2. Dept. of Interior, BOR, Wash., D.C. 3. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Reston, VA 48-1 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 BOARD NAME YEAR ESTABLISHED UNITED STATES REPRESENTATION 12. Int. Champlain-Richelieu 13. Int. Levels Reference Study 14. Int. Lake Memphremagog 15. Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data 16. Int. Niagara Committee 17. Columbia River Treaty Entities 18 Columbia River Treaty 1975 1993 1920 1953 1955 1964 1964 *1. New York Dept. Environ. Conser. 2. District Engineer, New York 3. Vermont Agency Environ. Conser. 4. New England River Basins Commission, Staff Associate 5. Dept. of Interior F&WS, Boston, MA *1. Director, Engineering and Planning, North Central Division 2. State of Pennsylvania 3. State of Minnesota 4. International Great Lakes Coalition 5. Private citizen, Midland, MI *District Engineer, New York *1. Engineer Division, North Central Division 2. Dept. of Commerce, Ann Arbor, MI *Division Engineer, North Central Division 1. Division Engineer, North Pacific Division *2. Bonneville Power Admin., Portland, OR *1. HQUSACE, CECW-ZB, Wash., D.C. 2. Dept.. of Energy, Tucson, AZ * Signifies U.S. Section Chairman Study of Fluctuating Great Lakes Levels Under the August 1, 1986, Reference The IJC, through the U.S. Department of State, requested by letter dated November 24, 1986, that the Corps of Engineers provide lead agency support on what became known as the Levels Reference Study. The Division Commander, North Central Division, assumed the role of U.S. Chair of a multi-discipline study group which functioned as a Project Management Team. The team consisted of five functional groups co-chaired by U.S. and Canadian representatives. The Canadian counterpart to the Corps of Engineers was Environment Canada. A Plan of Study was completed in April 1987. The plan called for a two-phase study with the initial phase emphasizing problem identification and a program of measures for detailed study and evaluation in Phase II. The Phase I progress report was submitted to the IJC in July 1989. After a period of public review in February 1990, the IJC issued a directive for the Phase II study, which included the appointment of a ten-member Levels Reference Study Board. The Board appointed a full-time study director and an 18-member Citizens Advisory Committee. Upon completion of the Phase II Plan of Study in May 1990, the Board also appointed four working committees to carry out the detailed study plan. The working committees are: (1) Public Participation and Information; (2) Land Use and Management; (3) Existing Regulation, System-wide Regulation, and Crisis Conditions; and, (4) Principles, Measures Evaluation, Integration and Implementation. On March 31, 1993, the Levels Reference Study Board submitted its report to the IJC. The Board made 42 recommendations which were grouped into seven 48-2 INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY WATERS BOARDS categories: guiding principles; measures--lake level regulation; measures--land use and shoreline management; emergency preparedness; institutions; communications; management; and operational improvements. The IJC held a hearing on the Board's report and then submitted the Board's report and its own report to Governments in September and December 1993, respectively. To date, Governments have the reports under advisement. The reports have been the subject of discussions between the State Department, Canadian Department of Foreign Affairs, and the IJC. Several recommendations have been implemented, or are in the process of being implemented, under the IJC authority. These include expanding the membership of the St. Lawrence Board and examining the Lake Ontario regulation plan. These activities are being supported by the Corps offices in Chicago, Buffalo, and Detroit. 48-3 INVESTIGATION OF PROJECTS UNDER FEDERAL POWER ACT - This page intentionally left blank - 49-1 REGULATORY, SUNKEN VESSEL REMOVAL AND NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES 1. Regulatory Activities Authorities. The following authorities charge the Corps of Engineers with the regulation of various construction related activities in U. S. waters and wetlands: Sections 9 and 10 of the River and Harbors Act of 1899 (structures in waterways and the alteration of waterways); Section 103 of the Marine, Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (Ocean Dumping); and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (discharge of dredged or fill material). Work Completed. During FY 1998, the Corps reviewed and authorized 90,000 permit activities, 90 percent of which were approved within 60 days. About 7,500 projects were issued individual permits, and another 82,000 activities were reviewed and approved under regional or nationwide general permits. General permits are issued to the public at large and define types of minor activities which do not usually require the extensive review necessary for projects authorized by individual permits. Use of general permits provides significant relief to the regulated public by avoiding red tape for small projects with minimal environmental impacts. The Corps denied only about 200 permits during FY 1998 since most projects which might otherwise have been denied a permit were either modified or conditioned to meet Corps requirements, scaled down to qualify for approval under general permits, or withdrawn. About 4700 permit applications were either withdrawn or canceled. Under the regulatory program, the Corps made over 60,000 jurisdiction determinations in FY 98, many of which were made in response to requests from landowners who were not applying for permits. The Corps investigated almost 6,000 alleged illegal activities, most of which were violations of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Under the permit program in FY 1998, the Corps allowed the filling of 31,000 acres of wetlands but required the restoration, enhancement, or creation of 46,000 wetland acres. During FY 1998, the Corps continued work to implement some aspects of the President's Wetlands Plan, announced in August 1993. The plan was designed to both improve protection of the nation's wetlands and to make the regulatory process easier and more fair for the regulated public. Two key legal decisions impacted the program's jurisdiction in FY 1998: In the "Tulloch" case, a June 1998 District of Columbia Circuit Court decision upheld a district court decision that the Corps does not regulate excavation activities that only involve incidental fallback. As a result, there are many excavation activities not requiring permits. The Corps had been regulating excavation activities since 1993, following settlement of a lawsuit against the Corps by the National Wildlife Federation. In the "Wilson" decision, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals handed down a decision on December 23, 1997 involving criminal prosecutions for violations of the Clean Water Act. Reversing convictions of a lower court, the three-judge panel indicated that the Corps regulations governing jurisdiction over isolated waters, including wetlands, under the Clean Water Act were invalid. This could significantly affect Corps jurisdiction over these waters if this holding becomes a controlling law. 50-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE A GENERAL REGULATORY FUNCTIONS Obligations Unobligated Balance- 30 Sep 97 Allotments Total Funds Available Obligations Unobligated Balance- 30 Sep 98 Expenditures Unexpended Balance- 30 Sep 97 Allotment Total Funds Available Expenditures Unexpended Balance- 30 Sep 98 Investigation and Removal of Sunken Vessels Under the authority of Sections 19 and 20 of the River and Harbor Act of 1988, the Corps of Engineers investigated sunken vessels in navigable $ 2,836,071 106,000,000 $ 108,836,071 104,771,171 $ 4,097,412 $ 4,770,812 106,000,000 $ 110,770,812 $ 104,437,339 6,365,985 waters and removed those obstructing navigation. For obligation expenditures, see Table B 50-2 REGULATORY, SUNKEN VESSEL REMOVAL AND NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES TABLE B REMOVAL OF SUNKEN VESSELS Obligations Unobligated Balance- 30 Sep 97 Allotment Total Funds Available Obligations $ 3,244 0 3,244 245 Unobligated Balance- 30 Sep 98 $ 2,999 Expenditures Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 97 Allotment Total Funds Available Expenditures Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 98 3. National Emergency Preparedness Activities Authority. Executive Order 12656, as amended, assigns responsibilities to executive departments and agencies in order to undertake the national emergency planning and preparedness activities necessary to develop an effective national capability to meet essential civilian and national security needs during major domestic crises (including catastrophic diasters) and national security emergencies. Status. During FY 1998, the Corps of Engineers continued its effort to improve the command's readiness posture and its ability to respond to various national emergencies. Emphasis on those activities necessary for a successful transition from a "cold war" focus to preparedness associated with catastrophic natural disasters and adjusting Continuity of Government (COG) programs was continued. The primary focus during FY 1998 was the preparation for catastrophic natural/technological disasters. Lessons learned from Midwest Floods of 1993, as well as those 3,244 0 3,244 245 $ 2,999 gleaned from events such as Hurricanes Hugo, Andrew and Iniki, Loma Prieta and Northridge Earthquakes and the evolving New Madrid Earthquake scenario, clearly indicate that, while the Federal Response Plan is a solid response system, it does not provide for response to disasters with national implications in a way that is sufficiently timely or comprehensive. The Corps has initiated a program that will use the deliberate planning process to develop scenario specific plans for catastrophic disasters. This should lead to a more timely and effective execution of Corps responsibilities during disasters that have national impacts. Extensive coordination with Federal agencies and state and local governments will be incorporated into plan development. Other activities included a continuation of the planning for and maintenance of emergency facilities needed to support continuity of operations and coordination with the Federal Emergency Management in the development of a new Continuity of Government (COG) concept of operations. For fiscal year obligations and expenditures, see Table C. 50-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1998 TABLE C NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Obligations Unobligated Balance- 30 Sep 97 $ 448,680 Appropriations FY 98 5,467,905 Total Funds Available $ 5,916,765 Obligations 5,-15,382 Unobligated Balance- 30 Sep 98 $ 901,383 Expenditures Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 97 $ 643,442 Appropriations FY 98 5,467,905 Total Funds Available $ 6,111,347 Expenditures 4,745,992 Unexpended Balance- 30 Sep 98 $ 1,365,355 50-4 NATURAL DISASTER PREPAREDNESS RESPONSE AND RECOVERY ACTIVITIES Authority. Public Law 84-99 provides the authority for the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers to provide emergency/disaster assistance for Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies (33 U.S.C. 701n) (69 Stat. 186). Under this law, the Chief of Engineers, acting for the Secretary of the Army, is authorized to undertake activities including disaster preparedness, advance measures, emergency operations (Flood Response and Post Flood Response), rehabilitation of flood control works threatened or destroyed by flood, protection or repair of federally authorized shore protective works threatened or damaged by coastal storm, and provisions of emergency water due to drought or contaminated source. Under Public Law 93-288, The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.) (88 Stat. 143) Act (The Stafford Act), the Federal Emergency Management Agency may direct USACE to use its resources to provide assistance in the event of a major disaster or emergency declaration by the President. Under The Stafford Act and the Federal Response Plan, USACE has a standing mission to provide assistance in the area of Public Works and Engineering, Emergency Support Function #3 for response to a major disaster or catastrophic event. Activities. Major disaster preparedness activities included: the review and updating of response plans to ensure viability; training personnel to ensure their capability to respond in adverse circumstances; procurement and propositioning of critical equipment and supplies which would likely not be available during initial stages of a response; periodic exercises to test and evaluate plans, personnel and training; inspection of non-Federal flood control projects to ensure their viability to provide flood protection; and the overall management of the Disaster Preparedness and Response Program to ensure a workable, coordinated effort is undertaken in a timely manner. In addition, work continued on response planning activities related to the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Federal Response Plan for providing engineering and construction support following catastrophic events such as Hurricanes Andrew, and Georges, the Northridge Earthquake, and the Oklahoma City bombing. (For each specific event, Headquarters augments its staff to manage the event involving resource allocations (dollars and people), logistics of moving people and materials, funding contractors and materials and coordination with agencies involved in the event). These augmentation activities include overtime for Headquarters staff, travel to the event area, purchasing materials and supplies, increase staffing to include Individual Mobilization Augmentees (IMA), and providing Geographic Information System (GIS) services. Significant Events. During 1998, the Corps responded to requirements for flood fighting, debris removal, emergency power, the supply of ice and water, temporary housing, emergency roofing and technlmical assistance in 12 states, Puerto Rico and Guam. $600M was spent on FEMA missions and $100M was spent on Corps missions Early in the year, the primary focus of the Corps was on the threat of "El Nino" and its projected impact on California and the Gulf Coast. Extensive preparedness activities were undertaken, to include several innovative Advance Measures initiatives to address flood threats in California, where many areas were still recovering from the devasting floods of 1997. The Corps ultimately engaged in several flood fights in the SacrementoiSan Joaquin and Pajaro reiver basins. The Corps also cleared several debris basins in Santa Barbara County and responded to later flooding in the State of Texas. The Texas flooding was triggered, in part, by the advent of Tropical Storm Charlie in July. In late August and into September, the Corps was heavily engaged in emergency response/recorery operations related to hurricanes Bonnie and Georges. More than $2.6M of Corps funds and $3.4M of FEMA dollars were expended on Bonnie. More than $8M of Corps funds and $574M of FEMA funds were expended in support of the response to Georges. Since it involved a response to heavy damage outside the continental United States (Puerto Rico), as well as to significant impacts in Louisiana, Florida, mississippi and Alabama, George provided a particularly major challenge. The overall response to this storm represents the greatest commitment of Corps resources to a disaster since Hurricane Andrew. Bonnie and George also provided the first opportunity to utilize several new response concepts. Primary among these was the use of the Readiness2000 51-1 (R2K) concept for response operations.This concept, which regionalizes/nationalizes our disaster response effort, enables the Corps to provide a response that is expeditious, efficient and effective while, at the same time, amoelirating the impact on our normal civil works missions. 51-2 APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 1998 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) ALASKA Chena River Lakes ARIZONA Adobe Alamo Cave Buttes Dreamy Draw New River Painted Rock Tat Momolikot Whitlow Ranch ARKANSAS Blakely Mountain Blue Mountain DeGray DeQueen Dierks Gillham Yukon Kuskokwim Gila Colorado Gila Gila Gila Gila Gila Gila Ouachita Dam Arkansas Ouachita Red Red Red Chena River Skunk Creek Bill Wms. River Cave Creek Dreamy Draw New River Gila River Santa Rosa Wash Queen Creek Ouachita Petit Jean River Caddo Rolling Fork River Saline River Cossatot River Fairbanks Phoenix Wenden Phoenix Phoenix Phoenix Gila Bend Casa Grande Superior Hot Springs Paris Arkadelphia DeQueen Dierks Gillham 1979 1982 1968 1979 1973 1985 1959 1974 960 1955 1947 1971 1977 1975 1975 2,000 18,350 1,045,300 46,600 320 43,520 2,476,340 198,550 34,500 2,768,500 257,900 881,900 136,100 96,800 221,800 NPP NPP 560 NPP NPP NPP NPP NPP NPP 20,900 2,910 6,400 1,680 1,360 1,370 FR Earth FR Earth FRWX Earth FRX FRX F FRWX GWX Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth FX Earth FP FRWX FPRSQN FSQRW Earth Earth Earth Earth FSRAW Earth & Rock FSQW Earth & Rock 50 40,200 109 283 109 50 104 181 75.5 25 235 115 243 160 153 160 2,275 975 2,275 448 2,320 4,780 12,500 978 1,100 2,800 3,400 2,360 2,500 1,750 A-1 Length (Feet) APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 1998 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) Millwood Narrows Dam Nimrod CALIFORNIA Black Butte Brea Buchanan Dam H.V. Eastman Lake Carbon Canyon Coyote Valley Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Farmington Fullerton Hansen Harry L. Englebright Hidden Dam- Hensley Lake Isabella Red Ouachita Arkansas Sacramento Santa Ana San Joaquin Santa Ana Russian Russian San Joaquin Santa Ana Los Angeles Sacramento San Joaquin San Joaquin Little River Little Missouri Fourche LaFve River Stony Creek Brea Creek Chowchilla River Carbon Canyon River East Fork Russian River Dry Creek Littlejohn Creek East Fullerton Crk Big Tujunga Wash Yuba River Fresno River Kern River Ashdown Murfreesboro Plainview Orland Fullerton Chowchilla Brea Ukiah Healdsburg Farmington Fullerton Los Angeles Marysville Madera Bakersfield 1966 1949 1942 1963 1942 1975 1961 1959 1983 1952 1941 1940 1941 1975 1953 1,854,930 407,900 336,010 160,000 4,009 150,000 6,614 122,500 381,000 52,000 764 51,000 69,000 90,000 570,000 29,200 2,500 3,550 770 NPP 470 NPP 1,700 500 NPP NPP 120 400 5,000 1,850 FSW FP FSWX FIRX FRX FIRW FERX FRXS FRSW F FRX FRWX DR FIRW FIRW Earth Concrete Concrete Earth Earth Earth & Rock Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete Earth Earth 88 175 97 156 87 205.5 99 160 319 60 46 97 280 163 185 Length (Feet) 17,554 941 1,012 2,970 1,765 1,800 2,150 3,500 3,000 7,800 575 10,475 1,142 5,730 4,952 A-2 APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 1998 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) Lopez Martis Creek Merced County Streamed Group Bear Burnms Mariposa Owens Mojave River New Hogan North Fork Pine Flat Prado Redbank and Fancher Creeks San Antonio Santa Fe Sepulveda Success Terminus Los Angeles Sacramento San Joaquin San Joaquin San Joaquin San Joaquin Mojave San Joaquin Sacramento Pacoima Wash Martis Creek Bear Creek Bumrns Creek Mariposa Creek Owens Creek Mojave River Calaveras River American River San Femrnanado Reno Merced Merced Merced Merced Victorville Valley Springs Auburn San Joaquin Kings River Piedra Santa Ana San Joaquin Santa Ana River Fancher Creek Santa Ana San Antonio Creek San Gabriel San Gabriel River Los Angeles Los Angeles River San Joaquin Tule River San Joaquin Kaweah River Corona Fresno Upland Duarte Van Nuys Porterville Visalia 1954 1971 1954 1950 1948 1949 1971 1963 1939 440 20,400 7,700 7,000 15,000 3,600 89,669 325,000 14,700 1954 1,000,000 1941 1993 1956 1949 1941 1960 1961 196,235 9,712 7,703 32,109 17,425 85,000 150,000 NPP 71 NPP NP NPP NPP NPP 715 280 NPP NPP NPP NPP NPP NPP 400 345 FX Earth FSR Earth F FFF FRWX FIRX Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth & Rock DR Concrete FIRX Concrete FRX Earth F Earth FX Earth FRX Earth FRX Earth FIRX Earth FIRX Earth 50 113 92 55 88 75 106 210 155 429 106 1,333 2,670 1,830 4,075 1,330 790 1,250 1,960 620 1,820 2,280 44 16,135 160 3,850 92 23,800 57 15,444 142 250 3,490 2,375 A-3 Length (Feet) APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 1998 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) Whittier Narrows San Gabriel San Gabriel El Monte 1957 49,143 NPP FRWX Earth 56 River and Rio Hondo COLORADO Bear Creek Chatfield Cherry Creek John Martin Trinidad CONNECTICUT Black Rock Colebrook River Hancock Brook Hop Brook Mansfield Hollow Northfield Brook Thomaston West Thompson Missouri Missouri Missouri Arkansas Arkansas Bear Creek South Platte River Cherry Creek Arkansas River Purgatoire River Housatonic Branch Brook Connecticut West Branch, Farmington River Housatonic Hancock Brook Housatonic Hop Brook Thames Natchaug River Thames Northfield Brook Housatonic Naugatuck River Thames Quinebaug River Denver Denver Denver Lamar Trinidad Thomaston Riverton Plymouth Middlebury Willimantic Thomaston Thomaston Thompson 1978 1974 1950 1943 1977 1970 1969 1960 1968 1952 1965 1960 1965 30,810 231,429 93,920 605,115 124,463 8,700 97,700 4,030 6,970 52,000 2,430 42,000 26,800 109 1,412 852 1,844 563 20 760 40 21 450 8 NPP 200 FRX Earth FRX Earth FRX Earth FIR Concrete & Earth FIRX Earth FR Earth FRSX Earth FRW FR FRW FRW Earth Earth Earth Earth F Earth FRW Earth 180 148 141 106 200 154 223 57 97 68 118 142 5,300 12,400 14,300 13,962 6,610 933 1,300 630 520 12,420 810 2,000 70 2,550 A-4 Length (Feet) 16,960 APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 1998 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) IDAHO Lucky Peak ILLINOIS Carlyle Farmdale Fondulac Shelbyville Rend Lake INDIANA Brookville Cagles Mill Cecil M. Harden J. Edward Roush Mississinewa Monroe Patoka Salamonie Columbia Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Boise River Boise Kaskaskia River Farm Creek Fondulac Creek Kaskaskia River Big Muddy River East Fork of Whitewater River Mill Creek Raccoon Creek Wabash River Mississinewa Salt Creek Patoka River Salamonie Carlyle East Peoria East Peoria Shelbyville Benton Brookville Tere Haute Rockville Huntington Peru Harrodsburg Ellsworth Wabash 1955 1967 1951 1951 1970 1970 1974 1952 1960 1969 1967 1964 1978 1966 306,000 983,000 15,500 3,780 684,000 294,000 359,600 228,120 132,800 153,100 368,400 441,000 301,600 263,600 2,820 FIR Earth 26,000 FSNRWA Earth NPP NPP 11,100 18,900 2,250 1,400 1,100 500 1,100 3,280 2,010 976 F Earth F Earth FSNRW Earth FQRSW Earth FRSW Earth& Rock FRX Earth FRX Earth FRW Earth FRW Earth FARS Earth FRSQW Earth & Rock FRW Earth 340 2,340 67 6,570 80 1,275 67 1,000 108 3,000 54 10,600 182 150 117 91 137 93 84 133 3,000 950 1,790 5,332 8,100 1,400 1,550 6,100 A-5 Length (Feet) APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 1998 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) IOWA Coralville Red Rock Rathbun Saylorville KANSAS Clinton Council Grove El Dorado Elk City Fall River Hillsdale John Redmond Kanopolis Marion Melvern Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Missouri Upper Mississippi Missouri Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Missouri Arkansas Missouri Arkansas Missouri Iowa River Des Moines River Chariton River Des Moines River Wakarusa River Grand (Neosho) Walnut River Elk River Fall River Big Bull Creek Grand (Neosho) Smoky Hill River Cottonwood River Marais des Cygnes Iowa City Des Moines Centerville Des Moines Lawrence Council Grove El Dorado Independence Fall River Hillsdale Burlington Marquette Marion Melvern 1958 1969 1969 1975 1977 1964 1981 1966 1949 1981 1964 1948 1968 1972 475,000 1,830,000 552,000 585,000 397,200 112,882 246,882 287,200 254,900 160,000 626,000 450,000 141,890 363,000 5,430 19,000 11,000 5,950 7,000 3,259 8,400 4,440 2,330 4,580 9671 3,815 6,210 6,930 FARWQ FARWQ FNRWXQ S FARWQ Earth Earth Earth Earth FSWXRQ Earth & Rock FSQR Earth FSQR Earth FSQWR Earth FSXQR Earth FSQRWX Earth FSQR Earth FRWXS Earth FRQS Earth FRQWXS Earth A-6 Length (Feet) 100 110 86 105 114 96 99 107 94 75 86.5 131 67 98 1,400 5,676 10,600 6,750 9,250 6,500 20,930 4,840 6,015 11,600 21,790 15,360 8,495 9.700 APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 1998 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) Milford Pearson Skubitz Big Hill Perry Pomona Toronto Tuttle Creek Wilson KENTUCKY Barren River Buckhorn Carr Fork Cave Run Dewey Missouri Arkansas Missouri Missouri Arkansas Missouri Missouri Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Republican River Big Hill Creek Deleware River 110 Mile Creek Verdigris River Big Blue River Saline River Barren River Middle Fork of Kentucky River Carr Fork Licking River Johns Creek Junction City Cherryvale Perry Pomona Toronto Manhattan Wilson Glasgow Buckhorn Hazard Farmers Paintsville Length (Feet) 1965 1981 1969 1963 1960 1962 1964 1964 1960 1976 1974 1949 1,160,000 39,540 770,000 230,000 200,800 2,346,000 776,000 815,200 168,000 47,700 614,100 93,000 15,600 1,190 12,500 4,000 2,660 15,800 9,000 4,340 550 530 6,790 1,100 FRSXWN FSRW FRSXWN FRSWXQ FXSQWR FRWXQN S FIRWXN FARS FQRW FQRW FQRW FARW Earth & Rock Earth Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth Earth & Rock Earth Earth Earth Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth 126 83 96 85 90 157 160 146 162 130 148 118 6,300 3,902 7,750 7,750 4,712 7,500 5,600 3,970 1,020 720 2,740 913 A-7 APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 1998 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) Fishtrap Grayson Green River Martins Fork Paintsville Nolin Rough River Taylorsville Yatesville LOUISIANA Bayou Bodcau Ohio Ohio Ohio Cumberland Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Red Levisa Fork, Big Sandy River Little Sandy Green River Martins Fork Paint Creek Nolin River Rough River Salt River Blaine Creek Bayou Bodcau Pikeville Grayson Campbellsville Harlan Paintsville Kyrock Leitchfield Taylorsville Yatesville Shreveport 1968 1967 1969 1978 1983 1963 1958 1983 1988 1949 164,360 118,990 723,200 21,00 73,500 609,400 334,400 291,670 86,951 357,300 569 1,050 5,070 578 261 2,890 2,180 1,625 3,921 NPP FARW Rock FQRW Earth & Rock FRSQW Earth & Rock FQ Concrete FQRW Earth & Rock FAR Earth & Rock FRX Earth & Rock FQRW Earth & Rock FQRW Earth & Rock FRW Earth 195 120 142 97 160 174 124 164 105 1,100 1,460 2,350 574 1,600 990 1,530 1,280 760 70 12,850 A-8 Length (Feet) APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 1998 Characteristics of Dam Name Caddo Lake Wallace Lake MARYLAND Jennings Randolph Lake MASSACHUSETTS Barre Falls Birch Hill Buffumville Charles River Natural Valley Storage Conant Brook East Brimfield River Basin Red Red Potomac Connecticut Connecticut Thames Charles Connecticut Connecticut Stream Cypress Bayou Cypress Bayou North Branch Potomac River Ware River Millers River Little River Charles River Conant Brook Quinebaug River Community in Vicinity Shreveport Shreveport Barnum Barre So. Roylaston Charlton Millis Monson Fiskdale Cal. Year Placed in Useful OP 1971 1946 1981 1958 1941 1958 1983 1966 1960 Total Storage (Acre-Ft.) 175,000 96,100 130,900 24,000 49,900 12,700 35,000 3,740 30,000 Permanent Pool (Acreage) or No Pool (NPP) 32,700 2,300 952 NPP NPP 200 NPP NPP 360 Project Functions NFRS FQRS FQRSW FRW FRW FRW F F FRW H( Type Concrete & Earth Earth Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Nonstructural Earth & Rock Earth & Rock [eight Length Feet) (Feet) 3,700 30 4,994 296 2,130 62 56 885 1,400 66 3,255 85 55 1,050 520 A-9 APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 1998 Characteristics of Dam Name Hodges Village Knightville Littleville Tully West Hill Westville MINNESOTA Big Stone Lake- Whetstone River (HWY 75) Lac Qui Parle Chippewa River LacQui Parle River Basin Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connnecticut Blackstone Thames Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Stream French River Westfield River Middle Branch, Westfield River Tully River West River Quinebaug River Minnesota River Chippewa River Minnesota River Community in Vicinity Oxford Huntington Chester Fryville Uxbridge Sturbridge Odessa Watson Montevideo Cal. Year Placed in Useful OP 1959 1941 1965 1949 1960 1961 1974 1950 1950 Total Storage (Acre-Ft.) 12,800 49,000 32,400 22,000 12,350 11,100 45,000 (2) 158,700 Permanent Pool (Acreage) or No Pool (NPP) NPP NPP 275 300 NPP 23 12,700 NPP 7,750 Project Functions FRW FRW FRWS FRW FRW FRW FRW FRWX FRWX Height (Feet) 55 160 1,164 62 51 78 25 23.3 25 Type Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth Rolled Earth Rolled Earth Length (Feet) 2,140 1,200 1,360 1,570 2,400 560 13,700 17,975 4,100 A-10 ~ ~ ~ ~ Chrctrstc o. a APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 1998 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) Marsh Lake Orwell Red Lake MISSISSIPPI Arkabutla Lake Enid Lake Grenada Lake Okatibbee Sardis Lake MISSOURI Clearwater Long Branch Upper Mississippi Red River Red River Lower Mississippi Lower Mississippi Lower Mississippi Pascagoula Lower Mississippi White Grand Chariton Minnesota River Otter Tail River of the North Red Lake River of the North Coldwater River Yocona River Mississippi Yalobusha River Okatibbee Creek Little Tallahatchie Rivere Black River Little Charlton Montevideo Fergus Falls Red River Arkabutla Enid Grenada Meridian Sardis Piedmont Macon 1953 1953 1951 1945 1952 1954 1969 1940 1948 1980 35,900 14,100 3,270,000 525,300 660,000 1,337,400 142,400 1,570,000 413,700 65,000 8,600 790 288,800 5,100 6,100 9,800 1,280 10,700 1,630 2,430 FARS Rolled Earth FARS Rolled Earth FARSX Earth & Rock F Earth & Rock F Earth & Rock F Earth & Rock FQSR Earth F Earth & Rock FRWX Earth & Rock FRSQW Earth 19.5 47 15.5 81 99 102 67 117 154 Length (Feet) 11,800 1,355 36,500 11,500 8,400 13,900 6,543 15,300 4,225 71 3,800 A-11 APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 1998 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) Little Blue River Lakes Blue Springs Longview Pomme de Terre Smithville Wappapello Little Blue River Little Blue River Pomme de Terre River Little Platte River St. Francis River Kansas City Kansas City Hermitage Smithville Wappapello 1988 1986 1961 1982 1941 26,600 46,900 650,000 246,500 613,200 560 930 7,820 7,190 4,100 F F FRW Earth & Rock FRWQ Earth RWXA Earth & Rock SQRW Earth FR Earth & Rock Length (Feet) 78 2,500 120 155 95 109 1,900 4,630 4,200 2,700 NEBRASKA Harlan County Papillion Creek and Tributaries Glenn Cunningham (Site 11) Standing Bear (Site 16) Ed Zorinsky (Site 18) Wehrspann (Site 20) Salt Creek & Tributaries Olive Creek (Site 2) Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Republican Riv Knight Creek Trib of Big Papillion Creek Boxelder Creek S. Papillion Creek S. Trib. Olive Br. Creek Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Lower Mississippi Republican City Omaha Omaha Omaha Omaha Kramer 1952 1975 1973 1991 1991 1964 850,000 17910 5,220 6,910 1,990 5,470 13,600 391 137 418 203 174 FIRWXA FQEX FRX FR FR FR Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth 107 67 70 64 59 45 11,827 1,940 1,460 11,400 11,810 3,020 A-12 APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 1998 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) Blue Stem (Site 4) Wagon Train (Site 8) Stagecoach Site (9) Yankee Hill (Site 10) Conestoga (Site 12) Town Lake (Site 13) Pawnee (Site 14) Holmes Park Lake (Site 17) Branched Oak (Site 18) NEW HAMPSHIRE Blackwater Edward MacDowell Franklin Falls Hopkinton-Everett Otter Brook Surry Mountain Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Merrimack Merrimack Merrimack Merrimack Merrimack Connecticut N. Trib Olive Br. Creek N. Trib. Hickman Creek S. Trib. Hickman Creek Cardwell Creek Holmes Creek Middle Creek N. Middle Creek Antelope Creek Oak Creek Blackwater River Nubanusit Brook Pemigewasset Riv Contoocook River Piscataquog Riv Sprague Holland Hickman Denton Denton Pleasantdale Emerald Lincoln Raymond Webster West Peterborough Franklin West Hopkinton East Weare Otter Brook Keene Connecticut Ashuelot River Keene 1963 1963 1964 1966 1964 1966 1965 1963 1968 1941 1950 1943 1962 1962 1958 1941 10,260 9,280 6,640 7,560 10,640 8,080 29,520 6,510 97,560 46,000 12,800 154,000 71,500 87,500 18,300 32,500 316 303 196 208 230 255 728 100 1,780 NPP NPP NPP 200 120 85 265 FR FR FB FR FR FR FR FR FR FRW FRW FRW FRW FRW Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth FRW Earth FRW Earth 57 52 48 52 63 65 55 70 75 67 140 76 115 133 2,760 1,650 2,250 3,100 3,000 5,000 7,700 5,200 1,150 1,030 1,740 790 2,000 1,288 86 1,670 A-13 Length (Feet) APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 1998 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) NEVADA Mathews Canyon Pine Canyon NEW MEXICO Abiquiu Cochiti Conchas Galisteo Jemez Canyon Santa Rosa Two Rivers: Diamond "A" Dam Rocky Dam NEW YORK Almond Arkport East Sidney Mount Morris Whitney Point Mathews Canyon Pine Canyon Caliente Caliente Rio Charma Abiquiu Rio Grande Pena Blanca Canadian River Galisteo Creek Jemez River Pecos Rio Hondo Rocky Arroyoo Canacadea Crk Canisteo Crk Ouleout Crk Genesee River Otselic River Tucumcari Santa Fe Bernailillo Santa Rosa Roswell Hornell Arkport Franklin Mount Morris Whitney Point 1957 1957 1963 1975 1939 1970 1953 1979 1963 1949 1940 1950 1952 1942 6,271 7,747 1,192,800 582,019 513,900 89,468 97,425 438,364 163,775 14,005 7,900 33,550 337,000 86,440 NPP NPP NPP 1,200 2,694 NPP NPP NPP NPP 162 NPP 210 170 1,200 FX Earth FX Earth FXS Earth FRWX Earth FI Concrete & Earth FX Earth FX Earth FIX Earth FX Earth FRW Earth F Earth FRW Concrete & Earth FR Concrete FRW Earth 71 92 325 241 200 156 146.6 212 998 118 90 113 130 210 Length (Feet) 800 884 1,540 28,300 19,400 2,820 780 1,950 4,885 2,940 1,260 1,200 2,010 1,028 95 4,900 A-14 Colorado Colorado Rio Grande Rio Grande Arkansas Rio Grrande Rio Grande Pecos Pecos Pecos Susquehanna Susquehanna Susquehanna Genesee Susquehanna APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 1998 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) NORTH CAROLINA B. Everett Jordan Falls W. Kerr Scott NORTH DAKOTA Baldhill Bowman-Haley Homme Pipestem OHIO Alum Creek Berlin Caesar Creek Clarence J. Brown Cape Fear Neuse Yadkin Pee Dee Red River of the North Missouri Red River of the North James River Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio New Hope Neuse Yadkin Sheyenne River North Fork, Grand River South Branch of Park River Pipestem Creek Alum Creek Mahoning Creek Caesar Creek Durham Raleigh Wilkesboro Valley City Haley Park River Jamestown Africa Deerfield Wilmington Buck Creek Springfield 1982 1983 1963 1951 1967 1953 1974 1975 1943 1978 1974 753,500 335,620 153,000 85,200 92,980 6,700 146,880 134,800 91,200 242,200 63,700 14,300 11,300 1,470 5,430 1,750 194 885 348 240 13,300 1,010, FQRSWX FQRSWX FARSX Earth Earth Earth FARS Earth FSRWK Earth FARS Earth FRWX Earth FRSW Concrete & Earth FARSWQ Concrete & Earth FRSQW Earth & Rock FQRW Earth & Rock 112 92 148 1,330 1,915 1,740 61 1,650 79 5,730 67 108 865 4,000 93 10,000 96 5,750 165 2,750 72 6,620 A-15 Length (Feet) APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 1998 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) Deer Creek Delaware Ohio Ohio Dillon Michael J. Kirwan Mosquito Creek Muskingum River Reservoirs: Atwood Beach City Bolivar Charles Mill Clendening Dover Leesville Mohawk Mohicanville Piedmont Pleasant Hill Senecaville Tappan Wills Creek Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Deer Creek Olen Tangy River Licking River West Branch, Mahoning River Mosquito Creek Indian Fork Sugar Creek Sandy Creek Black Fork Brushy Fork Tuscarawas River McGuire Creek Walhondoing Riv Lake Fork Stillwater Creek Clear Fork Seneca Fork Little Stillwater Crk Wills Creek New Holland Deleware Zanesville Newton Falls Cortland New Cumberland Beach City Bolivar Mifflin Tippecanoe Dover Leesville Nellie Mohicanville Piedmont Perrysville Senecaville Tappan Conesville 1968 1961 1961 1966 1944 1937 1937 1938 1936 1937 1938 1937 1937 1936 1937 1938 1937 1936 1937 102,500 273,000 273,000 78,700 104,100 49,700 71,700 149,600 88,000 54,000 203,000 37,400 285,000 102,000 65,000 87,700 88,500 61,60-0 196,000 727 1,325 1,325 580 700 1,540 420 NPP 1,350 1,800 350 1,000 NPP NPP 2,270 850 3,550 2,350 900 FRW Earth FRWX Earth FRWX Earth FAQRSW Earth FARSWQ Earth FRX Earth FRX Earth FR Earth FRX Earth FRX Earth FRX Concrete FRX Earth FR Earth FR Earth FRX Earth FRX FRSX FRX Earth Earth Earth FRX Earth 93 118 118 83 3,880 1,400 1,400 9,900 47 5,650 65 3,700 64 87 48 64 83 74 111 46 56 113 45 52 5,600 6,300 1,390 950 824 1,694 2,330 1,220 1,750 775 2,350 1,550 87 1,950 A-16 Length (Feet) APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 1998 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) North Branch, Ohio North Branch Fredericktown 1973 14,900 98 FRW Earth 71 Kokosing River Lake Paint Creek Tom Jenkins West Fork Mill Creek William H. Harsha OKLAHOMA Arcadia Birch Canton Copan Fort Supply Great Salt Plains Heyburn Hugo Hulah Kaw Oologah of Kokosing River Paint Creek East Branch, Sunday Creek Mill Creek Little Miami River Deep Fork River Birch Creek North Canadian River Little Caney River Wolf Creek Salt Fork of the Arkansas River Polecat Creek Kiamichi River Caney River Arkansas River Verdigris River New Petersburg Gloucester Mt Healthy Williamsburg Edmond Barnsdall Canton Copan Fort Supply Cherokee Sapulpa Hugo Bartlesville Ponca City Oologah 1972 1951 1952 1978 1986 1977 1948 1983 1942 1941 1950 1974 1951 1976 1963 145,000 26,900 11,380 284,500 92,010 59,030 383,800 227,700 100,700 271,400 55,395 955,200 289,000 1,327,160 1,559,270 710 394 200 18,760 1,820 1,145 3,800 4,850 1,820 8,690 880 13,140 3,570 16,750 31,040 FRSQW Earth & Rock FRSWX Concrete FRX Earth FRSQW Earth FSR Earth FSQRW Earth FSI Earth FSQRW Earth FSX Earth FRWX Earth FRWXS Earth FSQRW FSAX FSQRW FSNRW Earth Earth Earth Earth 118 84 100 200 Length (Feet) 1,400 700 944 1,100 1,450 102 5,250 97 68 3,190 15,140 73 7,730 85 68 11,865 6,010 89 2,920 101 94 125 137 10,200 5,200 9,466 4,000 A-17 Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Red Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 1998 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) Optima Arkansas North Canadian Hardesty 1978 229,500 5,340 FSRW Earth 120 Pine Creek Sardis Skiatook Waurika Wister OREGON Applegate Blue River Cottage Grove Dorena Fall Creek Fern Ridge River Little River Jackfork Creek Hominy Creek Beaver Creek Poteau River Applegate River Blue River Coast Fork, Willamette River Row River Middle Fork, Willamette River Long Tom River Wright City Clayton Skiatook Waurika Wister Medford Blue River Cottage Grv Cottage Grv Eugene Eugene 1969 1982 1984 1977 1949 1981 1968 1942 1949 1965 1941 465,780 396,900 500,700 325,680 427,480 82,000 85,000 30,060 70,500 115,000 110,000 3,750 13,610 10,190 10,100 7,333 988 975 1,155 1,885 1,865 10,305 FSQWR FSRW FSQRW FISQWR FSAX Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth AFIQRSW Gravel Embankment FINR Earth FINR Concrete & Earth FINR Concrete & Earth FINR Rockfill & Concrete FINR Rockfill & Concrete 124 101 143 106 99 242 319 114 Length (Feet) 15,200 7,712 14,138 3,590 16,637 5,700 1,300 1,329 2,110 145 3,352 Red Red Arkansas Red Arkansas Rogue Columbia Columbia Columbia Columbia Columbia 5,100 49 6,624 A-18 193 APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 1998 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) Willow Creek Columbia Willow Creek Heppner 1983 13,250 96 FRN Roller 160 PENNSYLVANIA Alvin R. Bush Aylesworth Creek Beltzville Blue Marsh Conemaugh Cowanesque Crooked Creek Susquehanna Susquehanna Delaware Delaware Ohio Susquehanna Ohio Kettle Creek Aylesworth Creek Pohopco Creek Tulephoken Creek Conemaugh River Cowanesque River Crooked Creek Renovo Archbald Lehighton Reading Saltsburg Lawrenceville Ford City 1962 1970 1971 1978 1952 1980 1940 75,000 1,700 68,250 50,010 262,700 89,000 93,900 160 64 947 960 800 1085 350 FRWQ FRQ FQRSWA FAQRSW FW FRSQW FRW Compacted Concrete Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Concrete & Earth Earth & Rock Earth 165 90 170 98 137 151 143 Length (Feet) 1,780 1,350 1,270 4,560 1,775 1,265 3,100 1,480 A-19 APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 1998 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) Curwensville Susquehanna West Branch, Curwensville 1965 124,200 790 FRS Earth 131 Susquehanna River East Branch, Clarion River Foster Joseph Sayers Francis E. Walter (Bear Creek) Gen. Edgar Jadwin Hammond Lake Indian Rock Kinzua Loyalhanna Mahoning Creek Prompton Ohio Susquehanna Delaware Delaware Susquehanna Susquehanna Ohio Ohio Ohio Delaware East Branch, Clarion River Bald Eagle Creek Lehigh River Dyberry Creek Crooked Creek Codorus Creek Allegheny River Loyalhanna Creek Mahoning Crk West Branch, Lackawaxen River Wilcox Blanchard White Haven Honesdale Tioga York Warren Saltsburg New Bethlehem Honesdale 1952 1969 1961 1960 1978 1942 1965 1942 1941 1960 84,300 99,000 109,610 24,500 63,000 28,000 1,180,000 95,300 74,200 52,000 90 FARQW Earth 1,730 80 NPP 680 NPP FRWQ Earth FRW Earth & Rock F Earth FRQW Earth & Rock F Earth & Rock 1,900 PFAQRW Concrete & Earth 210 FRW Concrete & Earth 170 FRW Concrete 290 FRW Earth 184 1,725 100 234 109 122 6,835 3,000 1,255 6,450 83 1,000 1'77 114 162 140 1,877 960 926 1,200 A-20 Length (Feet) 2,850 APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 1998 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Pool(N P o Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) Raystown Susquehanna Raystown Huntingdon 1973 762,000 8,300 FRWPQ Earth 225 Branch, Juniata & River Rock Shenango Stillwater Tioga Lake Tionesta Union City Woodcock Creek Youghiogheny River SOUTH DAKOTA Cold Brook Cottonwood Springs Lake Traverse: Reservation Dam White Rock Ohio Susquehanna Susquehanna Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Missouri Missouri Red River of the North Red River of the North TEXAS Addicks San Jacinto Shenango River Lackawanna River Tioga River Tionesta Creek French Creek French Creek Youghiogheny Riv Cold Brook Cottonwood Springs Creek Bois de Sioux River Bois de Sioux River South Mayde Crk Sharpsville Uniondale Tioga Tionesta Union City Meadville Confluence Hot Springs Hot Springs Wheaton Wheaton Addicks 1966 1960 1978 1940 1970 1973 1943 1953 1970 1941 1941 1948 191,400 12,000 62,000 133,400 47,640 20,000 254,000 7,200 8,385 177,000 96,000 204,500 1,910 85 470 480 NPP 118 450 36 41 FAQRW Concrete FS Earth FRQW Earth FRW F FQRA FARWQ & Rock Earth Earth Earth Earth FRWX Earth FRWX Earth 10,925 FRX 3,850 FRX NPP Rolled Earth Rolled Earth FX Earth 68 720 77 1,700 140 154 88 90 184 127 123 2,710 1,050 1,420 4,650 1,610 925 1,190 14 9,100 16 14,400 49 61,166 A-21 Length (Feet) 1,700 APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 1998 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) Aquilla Barker Belton Benbrook Canyon Ferrells Bridge Dam- Lake O' the Plains Granger Dam and Lake Grapevine Hords Creek Joe Pool Jim Chapman Lake Lake Kemp Lavon Lewisville Navarro Mills North San Gabriel Dam, Lake Georgetown O.C. Fisher Pat Mayse Proctor Brazos San Jacinto Brazos Trinity Guadalupe Red Brazos Trinity Colorado Trrinity Red Red Trinity Trinity Trinity Brazos Colorado Red Brazos Aquilla Creek Buffalo Bayou Leon River Clear Fork, Trinity River Guadallupe River Cypress Creek San Gabriel River Denton Creek Hords Creek Mountain Creek Sulphur River Wichita River East Fork, Elm Fork, Trinity River Richland Creek North Fork, San Gabriel River North Concho River Sanders Creek Leon River Hillsboro Barker Belton Fort Worth New Braunfels Jefferson Granger Grapevine Coleman Grand Prairie Cooper Wichita Falls Fort Worth Trinity River Lewisville Corsicana Georgetown San Angelo Arthur City Comanche 1983 1945 1954 1952 1964 1959 1980 1952 1948 1986 1991 1972 1953 1954 1962 1980 1952 1967 1963 146,000 207,000 1,097,600 258,600 366,400 842,100 244,200 425,500 25,310 304,000 441,200 502,900 748,200 989,700 212,200 130,800 396,400 182,940 374,200 3,280 NPP 12,300 3,770 346,400 18,700 4,400 7,280 510 7,470 19,305 15,590 21,400 23,280 5,070 1,310 5,440 5,940 4,610 FSX FX FIRSX Earth Earth Earth FNRXA Earth FRSX Earth FRS Earth FRSWX Earth FNRSXA FARSX FRSX Earth Earth Earth FRSWX Earth FIS Earth FRSW Earth FRSX Earth FRSX Earth FRSWX Rock FRSX Earth FRSW Earth FRSX Earth 104.5 27 192 130 224 11,890 72,844 5,524 9,130 4,410 97 10,600 115 137 91 109 16,320 12,850 6,800 22,360 79 28,070 115 81 125 82 164 8,890 19,483 32,888 6,700 6,700 128 40,885 96 86 7,080 13,460 A-22 Length (Feet) APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 1998 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) FucinsTp'(et Ray Roberts Somerville Stillhouse Hollow Waco Wright Patman UTAH Little Dell Lake VERMONT Ball Mountain North Hartland North Springfield Townshend Trinity Brazos Brazos Brazos Red Jordan River Elm Fork Yegua Creek Lampasas River Bosque River Sulphur River Dell Creek Connecticut West River Connecticut Ottauguechee River Denn Somerville Belton Waco 1987 1967 1968 1965 Texarkana Salt Lake City Jamaica North Hartland Connecticut Black River Springfield Connecticut West River Townshend 1,064,600 507,500 630,400 726,400 29,350 11,460 6,430 7,270 1957 2,654,300 20,300 1993 1961 1960 1960 1961 20,500 54,600 71,420 51,067 33,700 1,000 75 220 290 100 FRSX FRSX FRSX Earth Earth Earth FRSX Concrete & Earth FRSX Earth FS Earth FRW Concrete & Earth FRW Concrete & Earth FRW Concrete & Earth FRW Concrete & Earth A-23 Length (Feet) 109 80 200 140 100 224 14,965 26,175 15,624 24,618 18,500 1,700 265 915 185 120 133 1,520 2,940 1,700 APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 1998 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) Union Village Connecticut Ompompa- Union Village 1950 38,000 NPP FRW Con- 170 noosuc River crete & Earth VIRGINIA John W. Flannagan Gathright Dam & Lake Moomaw North Fork of Pound River WASHINGTON Howard A. Hanson Mill Creek Mud Mountain WEST VIRGINIA Beech Fork Bluestone Burnsville East Lynn Pound River Jackson North Fork of Pound Green River Mill Creek White River Beech Fork New River Little Kanawha Twelvepole Creek Haysi Alleghany Pound Kanaskat Walla Walla Enumclaw Lavalette Hinton Burnsville East Lynn 1963 1979 1968 1961 1942 1953 1977 1952 1977 1970 145,700 123,739 11,300 106,000 8,300 106,000 37,540 631,000 65,400 82,500 310 2,532 349 1,600 225 NPP 450 1,800 550 823 FAWR Concrete & Earth FQR Earth & Rock FRSW Earth & Rock FAS Rock FR Earth FR Rock FRW Earth FRWX Concrete FQRW Earth & Rock FQRW Earth & Rock 250 257 122 235 125 427 86 180 Length (Feet) 1,100 960 1,172 600 500 3,200 810 1,080 2,048 89 1,400 122 650 A-24 Ohio James Ohio Green Columbia Puyallup Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 1998 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Name Project Height River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) R. D. Bailey Ohio Guyandotte Justice 1979 203,700 440 FQRW Earth 310 River & Rock Stonewall Jackson Lake Sunmmersville Lake Sutton Tygart River WISCONISIN Eau Galle Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Chippewa West Fork Gauley River Elk River Tygart River Eau Galle Weston Summersville Sutton Grafton Spring Valley 1988 1965 1960 1938 1969 74,650 413,800 265,300 287,700 43,600 360 407 270 620 153 FAQAS Concrete FANR Rock FNAR Concrete FNAR Concrete FR Earth KEY FOR PROJECT FUNCTIONS: A - Low Flow Augmentation D - Debris Control F - Flood Control I - Irrigation N - Navigation P - Power Q - Water Quality Control R - Public Recreation (Annual Attendance exceeding 5,000) S - Water Supply W - Fish and Wildlife (Federal or State) X - Water Conservation and Sedimentation A-25 Length (Feet) 1,397 95 390 220 230 122 620 2,280 1,921 1,921 1,800 APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Constructed or Contributed to by Corps of Engineers But Operated by Others September 30, 1998 Name CCAALLIIFFOORRNNIIAA Big Dry Creek Camanche Cherry Valley Del Valle Eaton Wash New Bullards Bar New Don Pedro New Exchequer Oroville Tahchevah Creek COLORADO Pinon Canyon River Basin Stream San Joaquin Big Dry Creek San Joaquin Mokelumne River Tuolumne Cherry Creek Alameda Rio Hondo Sacramento San Joaquin San Joaquin Sacramento Whitewater Colorado Arroyo Del Valle Eaton Wash Yuba River Tuolumne River Merced River Feather River Tahchevah Creek Pinon Canyon Arroyo Community in Vicinity Fresno Clements Sonora' Livermore Pasadena Marysville Modesto Merced Oroville Palm Springs Trinidad Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Placed in Storage or No Useful (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) OP 1948 16,250 1963 431,500 1956 268,000 1968 1937 1968 1970 1966 1964 1965 1954 77,000 960 960,000 2,030,000 1,026,000 3,539,000 960 4,350 NPP NPP 475 200 NPP 1,910 3,520 1,900 5,838 NPP NPP Project Functions Heigh Type t (Feet) F Earth FRS Earth & Rock FS Earth & Rock FRS Earth F FIRPW FISP FIR FIRSW F Earth Concrete Earth & Rock Rock Earth Earth Length (Feet) 40 20,038 171 2,450 315 2,500 223 82 645 565 880 1,795 2,323 1,920 480 1,200 770 6,850 42 3,610 FW Earth CONNECTICUT East Branch Hall Meadow Brook Housatonic Housatonic East Branch, Naugatuck River Hall Meadow Brook Torrington Torrington 1964 1962 4,350 8,620 NPP NPP FR Earth F Earth & Rock A-26 I | APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Constructed or Contributed to by Corps of Engineers But Operated by Others September 30, 1998 Name Mad River Sucker Brook HAWAII Kaneohe-Kailua River Basin Connecticut Connecticut Kaneohe Stream Mad River Sucker Brook Kaneohe Stream Community in Vicinity Winchester Winchester Kaneohe Cal. Year Placed in Useful OP 1963 1970 1981 Total Storage (Acre-Ft.) 9,700 1,480 3,800 Permanent Pool (Acreage) or No Pool (NPP) 10 NPP 26 Project Functions Heigh Length Type t (Feet) (Feet) FR Earth F Earth FR Earth IDAHO Ririe MARYLAND Savage River MISSOURI Bear Creek NEW MEXICO Cuchillo Negro NEW YORK Onandaga Upper Snake Potomac Upper Mississippi Rio Grande Oswego Willow Creek Savage Bear Creek Cuchillo Creek Onondaga Creek Idaho Falls Westernport Hannibal Truth or Consequence Syracuse 1975 100,500 1952 1962 1991 1949 20,000 8,700 13,500 18,200 364 360 NPP NPP NPP FIR Earth FRSW Earth & Rock F Earth F Roller Compacted Concrete F Earth A-27 I I APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Constructed or Contributed to by Corps of Engineers But Operated by Others September 30, 1998 Heigh Type t (Feet) OKLAHOMA Altus Grand Lake O' the Cherokees Lake Hudson Red Arkansas Arkansas North Fork of the Red River Grand (Neosho) River Grand (Neosho) River Altus Disney Locust Grove 1948 152,429 6,260 1941 2,197,000 46,5006 1964 444,600 10,9006 FIS Concrete FRP Concrete FRP Concrete & Earth 90 1,104 147 6,565 90 4,494 UTAH Big Wash VERMONT East Barre Waterbury Wrightsville WASHINGTON Wynoochee Beaver Winooski Winooski Winooski Chehalis Big Wash Milford Jail Branch Waterbury North Branch Wynoochee River East Barre Waterbury Wrightsville Montesano 1961 1938 1938 1938 1,200 12,050 64,700 20,300 1972 70,000 NPP NPP 890 570 1,150 F Earth F FRP FR Earth Earth Earth FSARI Concrete & Earth 34 2,814 65 158 115 177 1,460 1,800 1,525 1,700 A-28 Name River Basin Stream Community in Vicinity Cal. Year Placed in Useful OP Permanent Pool (Acreage) or No Pool (NPP) Total Storage (Acre-Ft.) Project Functions Length (Feet) APPENDIX B Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 1998 Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Placed in Completed or Started Useful Scheduled for Project Operation Completion Nature of Project Aberdeen & Vicinity, SD (Sec 205) Alenaio Stream, Hawaii, HI Aloha-Rigolette Area, LA Alton to Gale Levee System, Mississippi River, IL and MO Aquashicola Creek (Borough of Palmerton) Arcadia Lake, OK Arkansas River at Riverfront Park, North Little Rock, AR Arizona Flood Wamrning, AZ (Sec 205) Ascalmore-Tippo Items, MS Ashland Road Bridge, Four Mile Creek, NE (Sec 14) Atchafalaya Basin, LA B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, NC Badger Creek near Browning, Glacier County, MT (Sec 14) Batesville Sewage Lagoon Batesville Water Tower, Batesville, AR Battle Mountain, NV (Sec 205) Bayou Des Glaises, LA Bayview Court, Bat St Louis, MS Beals Creek, Big Spring, TX Beech Fork, Bardstown, KY (Sec 205) Bethel Bank Stabilization, AK Big Fork River, MN Big Tujunga Wash, CA (Sec 14) 1995 1995 1996 1983 1998 1980 1998 1998 1984 1996 1928 1967 1993 1990 1998 1998 1938 1995 1993 1998 1992 1995 1997 1997 1999 1986 1998 (2) 1982 1994 1990 1939 1997 2000 1997 1999 Indefinite 1999 1986 1999 2001 1987 1996 2021 1998 1994 1990 1999 2000 1939 1996 1998 1999 1997 1997 2000 Local Protection Local Protection Interior Drainage Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Floodway and Levees Reservoir Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Interior Drainage Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Emergency Bank Stabilization Streambank Protection Bank Protection B-1 APPENDIX B Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 1998 Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Placed in Completed or Started Useful Scheduled for ,-x~ .,~,.1 , lti .. Project Black River, Poplar Bluff MO (Sec 205) Blackberry Creek, Henry County, VA (Sec 205) Black Warrior River, Northport Levee, AL Blue River Channel, Kansas City, MO Brays Bayou (Houston), TX Brush Creek, Jeanette, PA (Sec 14) Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX Buffalo Creek, Freeport, PA (Sec 14) Buford Trenton Irrigation District, ND Cache Creek Settling Basin, CA Cape Girardeau-Jackson, MO Carolina Beach and Vicinity, Carolina Beach Portion, NC Cattaraugus Creek, Arcade, NY (Sec 14) Cato Spring, Fayetteville, AR (Sec 205) Cedar Point Seawall Bay St Louis, MO Cedar River, Renton, WA (Sec 205) Central and Southern, FL Chaska, MN Cheat River Basin, WV FWS Chehalis River at South Aberdeen and Cosmopolis, WA Chena River Lakes, AK Chicago Shoreline, IL City Ditch, Brevoort, IN (Sec 205) Choctawhatchee/Pea Rivers, Alabama and Florida Choctawhatchee/Pea Rivers, Elba/Geneva Levees, AL peration 1 i Nature of Project 1999 1994 1999 2005 2013 1998 Indefinite 1998 2008 1995 2002 1998 1997 1996 1999 1999 Indefinite 1998 1998 1999 1989 2005 1999 1996 1999 Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Levee Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Periodic Nourishment Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoirs and Levee Local Protection Interior Drainage Flood Warning Local Protection Levees 1998 1994 1997 1994 1998 1984 1998 1994 1956 1994 1998 1990 1992 1998 1993 1996 1998 1998 1950 1988 1997 1994 1973 1997 1998 1995 1998 B-2 1998 1996 1996 1997 1979 APPENDIX B Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 1998 Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Placed in Completed or Started Useful Scheduled for n~~~~ i Project Operation nr m en on Chubb Runn, Franklin, PA (Sec 14) Clear Creek, TX Clifton, AZ Colorado River at Grand Junction, CO (Sec 205) Conneaut Lake, PA (Sec 14) Connellsville, PA (Sec 205) Connoquenessing Creek, Marion Twp, PA (Sec 205) Connoquenessing Creek, N. Swickley Twp, PA (Sec 205) Corte Madera Creek, CA County Road 62, Santa Fe, NM (Sec 14) Cowanesque Lake, PA Coyote and Berressa Creeks, CA Crooked Creek, Harrison, AR Dade County, FL Danville, VA (Sec 205) Dearbom River near Wolf Creek Lewis & Clark County, MT (Sec 14) Delaware River, Water Intake, Kickapoo Reservation, KS (Secl4) Delaware River vicinity of Port Jervis, NY Demonstration Erosion Control, MS Deshee River, Brevoort, IN (Sec 205) Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, IA Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake & Channel, CA Dunbar (Sewage Facilities), WV (Sec 14) East Nishnabotna River, Page County Bridge, IA (Sec 14) 1995 1988 1994 1994 1996 1996 1996 1997 1966 1994 1987 1994 1994 1975 1996 1994 1996 1995 1985 1998 1989 1967 1986 1992 1998 2008 1998 1997 1998 1998 1998 1998 Indefinite 1995 1990 Indefinite 1996 2038 1998 1994 2000 1996 Indefinite 1999 Indefinite 1996 1987 1994 Nature of Project Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Water Supply Modification Local Protection Local Protection, channel improvement Shore Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection (Ice Diversion) Local Protection Interior Drainage Recreation Reservoir Streambank Protection Streambank Protection B-3 1997 1995 1990 1994 1997 1994 1983 1987 1993 APPENDIX B Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 1998 Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Placed in Completed or Started Useful Scheduled for Project operation Sumpeulfo East St. Louis and Vicinity, IL - Rehabilitation Eight Mile Creek, AR El Paso, TX Elk Creek Lake, OR Fairfield Vicinity Streams, CA Falls Lake, NC Flathead River, MT Flatrock River, Rushville, IN (Sec 205) Fort Wayne and Vicinity, IN Four Rivers Basin, FL Fourche Bayou, Vicinity of Little Rock, AR Frankfort, KY (South Frankfort Section) French Creek, Wattsburg, PA (Sec 14) Gallatin River, (1-90), Gallatin County, MT Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR Grand River, Chariton County, MO (Sec 14) Gray's Creek, TN (Sec 14) Great Bend,KS Greenwood Bendway, Site 3, MS Greenwood Bendway, Site 4, MS Greenwood Bendway, Site 5, MS Guadalupe River, CA Guntersville Lake, Guntersville, AL Halstead,KS Hamlet City Lake, NC (Sec 602) 1988 1986 1971 1971 1985 1973 1998 1998 1994 1966 1987 1991 1996 1991 1999 1998 1998 1988 1986 1987 1987 1992 1988 1991 1998 2002 2003 2002 Indefinite 1993 1999 1999 1999 2001 1996 2002 1998 1998 1992 2005 2000 1998 1994 1988 1988 1988 2001 1989 1995 1998 Nature of Project Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Water Supply Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Riverbank Protection Riverbank Protection Riverbank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Lake Program B-4 1973 1993 1983 1986 1996 1992 1998 1998 APPENDIX B Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 1998 III Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Placed in Completed or Started Useful Scheduled for Project Hancock County Seawall, Hancock County, MS Hargus Creek, Circleville, OH (Sec 205) Hatchie River, Alcora & Tippah Co, MS Helena & Vicinity, AR Hennepin County, CSAH116, MN Highway 75, Embudo Creek, Dixon, NM (Sec 14) Highway 119, Derry, LA (Sec 14) Highway 218, Grand Chenier, LA (Sec 14) Highway 495, Natchitoches,Parish, LA (Sec 14) Hodges Village Dam, MA - Rehabilitation Holbrook, AZ Holes Creek, OH Homme Lake and Dam, ND Hoopersville Road, MD (Sec 14) Homrn Lake Creek, MS Houston, MN (Sec 205) Howard A. Hanson Dam, WA (D)am Safety Assurance) Jackson County Hwy 2318, MN Jacksonport, White River, AR Jackson Twp, Butler Co, PA (Sec 205) James R Olin Flood Control Project, VA Jim Chapman Lake, TX Joe Pool Lake, TX Kahawainui Stream, Oahu, HI (Sec 205) Kahoma Stream, Maui, HI Operation ULuu 1995 1996 1997 1997 1996 1995 1994 1995 1994 1997 1995 1998 1995 1993 1993 1995 1994 1994 1995 1997 1994 1958 1975 1989 1986 1995 1997 1999 2001 1997 1995 1994 1996 1994 2000 19978 1999 2002 1994 1998 1999 1998 1996 1997 1998 1998 1994 1994 1990 1990 Nature of Project Shorline Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Stireambank Protection; Complete Bank Stabilization Streambank Protection; Complete Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Dam Safety Assurances Shoreline Protection Local Protection Local Protection Seismic Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir, channel improvement Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection B-5 1997 1998 1997 1995 1994 1996 1994 1994 1994 1997 1996 1996 1991 1986 1990 1990 APPENDIX B Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 1998 Fiscal Year Started Project Kawainui Marsh, Oahu HI (Sec 205) Kings Creek, Tupelo, MS Klamath River, Klamath Glen Levee, CA 1996 Lake Ashtabula-Baldhill Dam, ND Lake Elsinore, CA (Sec 205) Lake Pontchartrain, LA Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, TX Lancassange Creek, Clark Co, IN (Sec 205) Larose to Golden Meadow, LA Levisa & Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River & Cumberland River, KY, WV &VA Little Calumet River, IN Little Dell Lake, UT Liverpool, IL (Sec 205) Lock Haven, PA Logan Creek, Pender, NE (Sec 205) Long Branch Lake, MO Loosahatchie, Memphis, TN (Sec 14) Los Angeles County Drainage Area (LACDA), CA Loves Park, IL Lower Columbia River Bank Protection, OR and WA Lower San Joaquin River, CA (Snagging and Clearing) Madrid Fire Station, Madrid, MO (Sec 14) Magpie Creek & Don Julio, CA (Sec 205) Mahoning River, Stmuthers, OH (Sec 205) Placed in Useful Operation 1997 1997 1997 1993 1994 1980 1998 1996 Fiscal Year Completed or Scheduled for Completion 1997 1999 1997 2001 1995 2013 1995 1997 2007 Indefinite 2008 1996 1998 1995 1999 Indefinite 1998 2006 2002 Indefinite Indefinite 1997 2000 1998 B-6 1995 1996 1996 1994 1993 1967 1987 1996 1972 1981 1990 1985 1997 1991 1996 1973 1998 1995 1991 1961 1985 1995 1997 1997 Nature of Project Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Dam Safety/Major Rehabilitation Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoirs Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Snagging and Clearing Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection APPENDIX B Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 1998 Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Placed in Completed or Started Useful Scheduled for Project Operation uompieuon Nature of Project Mahoning River, Waren, OH (Sec 14) Mankato Township, MN Maple Creek E. Fork, Howells, NE (Sec 205) Marietta Sewerline, OH (Sec 14) Mannmaton River, Vemrnon County, MO (Sec 14) Marshall, MN Marysville/Yuba City Levee Reconstruction, CA Masefau Bay, Tutuila Island, American Samoa (Sec 14) Mayfield Creek, KY (Sec 205) Mazon River Twp Road, IL McCreadys Point Road, MD (Sec 14) Melrose, WI Meramec River Basin (Valley Park Levee), MO Merced County Streams, CA Middle Rio Grande Flood Protection, Bemalillo to Belen, NM Mid-Valley Area Levee Reconstruction, CA Milk River, Malta, MT (Sec 205) Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR (Sec 205) Mill Creek, OH Mingo Creek, OK Mississippi River Channel Improvements (IA, IL, KY, LA, MI, MO & TN) Mississippi River Levees Missouri National Rec River, NE & SD 1996 1997 1996 1997 1998 1995 1996 1994 1996 1997 1996 1993 1989 1992 1994 1993 1996 1991 1985 1996 1993 1994 1990 1970 1988 1928 1928 1985 B-7 1998 1997 1996 1997 1998 2001 1999 1992 1998 1996 1994 1997 2004 Indefinite 2008 2000 1998 19995 Indefinite 1998 2020 2031 2007 1992 1993 1995 1994 1997 1994 1997 1992 Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Shoreline Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Shoreline Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Reservoirs Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Channel Improvements Main Line Levees Local Protection APPENDIX B Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 1998 Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Placed in Completed or Started Useful Scheduled for Project Operation Completion Nature of Project Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS and MO Molly Ann's Brook, NJ Mon River, Sewage Treatment Plant, Point Marion, PA Mon River, Water St. Point Marion, PA Moorefield, WV Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, WA Muddy Creek Cascade, Vaughn, MT (Sec 14) Mudline to Pineville, MS Mud Mountain Dam, WA (Dam Safety Assurance) Muscatine Island, IA Muskegon, Memorial Drive, MI (Sec 14) Muskingham River Lakes, OH Muskingum River Lakes, OH (Dam Safety Assurance) New Orleans to Venice, LA Newark, OH Nickleplate Road, French Creek, Fairfield, PA Nishnabotna River, Hamburg, IA (Sec 205) Nonconnanh Creek, TN & MS North Beach Boulevard, Bay St Louis, MS North Branch Chicago River North Ellenville, NY Nogales Wash, AZ North Fork, KY Rivers, Jackson, KY (Sec 205) Oates Creek, GA 1948 1995 1997 1998 1996 1986 1992 1984 1986 1995 1986 1976 1982 1969 1976 1998 1996 1990 1995 1970 1995 1994 1997 1990 1998 1990 1985 1995 1994 1998 1993 Unscheduled 1999 1999 1999 1997 Tobe determined 1994 1985 1999 2000 1994 1988 Indefinite 2017 1992 2001 1999 2003 1996 Indefinite 1997 1998 1999 1992 Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Modemrnization of Dam Local Protection Shoreline Protection Major Rehabilitation Modernization of Dams Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Snagging and Clearing Local Protection Flood Wamrning System Local Protection Local Protection B-8 APPENDIX B Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 1998 Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Placed in Completed or Started Useful Scheduled for Project Operation ompieuon Oconto River, McDonald St., WI Oelwin, Fayette County, IA (See 205) O'Hare Reservoir, IL Ohio River Boat Levee, Marietta, OH (Sec 14) Ohio River, Carrollton, KY (Sec 14) Ohio River, Chester, WV (Sec 14) Ohio River, Moundsville, WV (Sec 14) Otter Creek, Shannon Hills, AR (Sec 205) Ouachita River Levees, LA Paintsville Lake, KY Pajaro River, CA Panola-Quitman Item C, MS Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lake, NE Passaic River Preservation of National Storage Areas, NJ Pebble Creek, Scribner, NE (Sec 205) Pelucia Creek, Item 1, MS Pelucia Creek, Item lA, MS Pelucia Creek, Item 2, MS Pelucia Creek, Item 3, MS Pelucia Creek, Item 4, MS Peninsula Drainage District #1, OR (Sec 205) Penitentiary Branch, Frankfort, KY (Sec 205) Perry County L & D Nos. 1, 2, 3, MO Penry Creek, IA Petaluma River, Petaluma, CA (Sec 205) 1996 1993 1990 1997 1997 1994 1996 1984 1990 1973 1987 1984 1972 1997 1993 1985 1987 1990 1990 1993 1997 1997 1977 1995 1997 1999 1997 1999 1998 1998 1998 1998 1986 Indefinite7 1991 1989 1993 1995 2004 1995 1987 1987 1993 1994 1994 1999 1998 1985 2003 1998 Nature of Project Streambank Protection Local Protection Reservoir Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Reservoirs Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Interior Drainage Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection B-9 1998 1998 1984 1983 1989 1974 1994 1986 1987 1993 1993 1993 1998 1985 APPENDIX B Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 1998 Fiscal Year Started Project Petersburg, WV Pine River Dam, MN Phoenix, AZ, and Vicinity (including New River) Pigeon Creek, Monongahela, PA (Sec 205) Pinopolis Dam, SC (Sec 14) Portage, WI Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR Pt. Leflore, MS Punch Island Road Raccoon River, IA Ramapo River at Oakland, NJ Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, NJ, Matawan and Union Beach Sections Raritan River Basin, Greenbrook Sub-basin, NJ Ray Roberts Lake, TX Redbank & Fancher Creeks, CA Red River Basin Chloride Control (Area X) OK and TX Red River Below Denison Dam Rend Lake, IL Reno Flood Warning System, NV (Sec 205) Richmond, VA Rillito River, AZ Rio de LaPlata, PR Rio Puerto Neuvo, PR River Raisin, Ellis Library, MI (Sec 14) Placed in Useful Operation 1997 1994 1995 1986 1996 1987 1993 1970 1997 Fiscal Year Completed or Scheduled for Completion 1998 2001 1994 1999 1995 1999 1999 1986 1996 1999 2001 Indefinite 2009 1999 1994 Indefinite 1995 1999 2000 1995 Indefinite 2003 2007 1998 B-10 1996 1995 1980 1998 1995 1997 1975 1985 1996 1994 1995 1965 1998 1975 1987 1991 1948 1996 1998 1989 1994 1995 1994 1996 Nature of Project Local Protection Dam Safety Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Reservoir Chloride Control Levee & Streambank Protection Deficiency Correction Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection APPENDIX B Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 1998 I Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Placed in Completed or Started Useful Scheduled for Project Operation .ompieuon Roanoke River, Upper Basin, VA Roughan's Point, Revere, MA Running Slough Ditch Sacramento River Bank Protection, CA Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff, CA Sacramento River Flood Control, CA Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction, CA Salinas River, San Ardo, CA Salyersville, KY San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX San Luis Rey River, CA Santa Ana River Mainstem, CA Santa Paula Creek, CA Santree Dam, SC (Sec 14) Savan Gut, VI (Sec 205) Saylorville Lake, IA Saw Mill Run, PA Seappoose Drainage District, OR (Deficiency Modification) Seitz Run, Allegheny Co., PA (Sec 205) Sheyenne River, ND Sicily Island, LA, Levee Sidney, NE (Sec 205) Simmons Fieldcontrol Structure, AR (Sec 1135) Sims Bayou, TX Skyrocket Creek, Quray, Co (Sec 14) 1990 1997 1995 1989 1977 1941 1990 1997 1990 1963 1963 1918 1990 1993 1991 1957 1988 1990 1973 1995 1987 1965 1997 1998 1990 1983 1993 1998 1990 1998 2003 1999 1990 Indefinite Indefinite Indefinite 1997 1993 1998 2001 Indefinite Indefinite 2002 1995 2001 1996 2002 1998 1999 2003 2003 1995 1999 2008 1999 Nature of Project Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Environmental Restoration Local Protection Streambank Protection B-11 1994 APPENDIX B Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 1998 Fiscal Year Started Project Solomons Island, Calvert County, MD (Sec 14) Souris River Basin, ND South Central, PA Environmental Restoration Southeast Louisiana Sowashee Creek, Meridian, MS Springbrook Creek, PA Steele Bayou, MS Ste. Genevieve, MO St Francis Basin Stillwater, MN St. Johns Bayou- New Madrid Floodway, MO Sugar Creek, Bellbrook, OH (Sec 205) Swan Creek, Taney County, MO (Sec 14) Sweetwater River, CA Taylorsville Lake, KY Ted Rhodes Golf Course, Nashville, TN Tensas Cocodrie Pumping Plant, LA Tensas Cocodrie, LA, Levee (5) Teton River near Choteau, Teton County, MT (Sec 14) Thurman to Hamburg, IA Tombigbee River Tributaries, AL and MS Tongue River, State Park, Ranchester, WY (Sec 14) Town Brook, Quincy, MA Tropicana and Flamingo Washes, NV Tulsa and West Tulsa, OK Placed in Useful Operation 1993 1990 (3) 1997 1986 1993 1983 1995 1987 1993 1990 1994 1945 Fiscal Year Completed or Scheduled for Completion 1993 1998 2000 2007 (s) 1990 2003 2002 1999 2001 2003 1998 1986 1993 1997 1995 1996 Indefinite4 1993 1997 1997 1994 2001 2006 1993 B-12 . 1992 1985 1993 1997 1988 1989 1966 1995 1938 1996 1997 1996 1984 1972 1974 1995 1983 1974 1992 1996 1965 1993 1992 1995 1943 Nature of Project Streambank Protection Reservoir Local Protection Urban Flood Control Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Tributary levees & channels Local Protection Rural Urban Flood Control Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection; Complete Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Rehabilitation of Levee System APPENDIX B Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 1998 Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Placed in Completed or Started Useful Scheduled for Project Operation tompieuon Turtle Creek, PA Tygart Lake, WV Upper Gordon Creek, Hattiesburg, MS Upper Scioto River, Marion County, OH (Sec 205) Upper Yazoo Projects, MS Van Bibber Creek, CO (Sec 205) Village Creek, AL Walnut Canyon, CA (Sec 14) Walnut Creek, CA Waveland Seawall, Seawall, MS West Columbus, OH West Ray, Marshall, PA (Sec 14) West Tennessee Tributaries Westwego to Harvey, LA Wheeler Creek, Gainesville, TX (Sec 205) White River, Indianapolis Central, Waterfront, IN White River, Jacksonport, AR (Sec 205) Whiteman's Creek, AR Willamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA WV & PA Flood Control, WV & PA Wyoming Valley Levee Raising Yalobusha River Mile 7.5, MS Yatesville Lake, KY Yellowstone River, Livingston, MT (Sec 14) 1995 1996 1993 1986 1976 1995 1989 1994 1964 1995 1993 1990 1960 1991 1983 1995 1996 1994 1938 1980 1998 1996 1993 1964 1992 1997 2001 1995 1987 2011 2000 1996 1998 1997 1995 2003 1990 Indefinite' 2011 1984 2002 1998 1999 Indefinite 1996 2001 2001 1993 1995 1993 Nature of Project Local Protection Dam Safety Assurance Channel Improvement Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Shoreline Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Drainage and Flood Control Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Reservoir Streambank Protection B-13 1995 1990 1994 1996 1993 1995 1993 APPENDIX B Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 1998 Fiscal Year Started Project Yonkers (Nepera Park), NY Placed in Useful Operation 1994 Fiscal Year Completed or Scheduled for Completion Nature of Project 1995 Local Protection B-14 APPENDIX B Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 1998 ' Construction of further channel improvement was halted in 1987 due to the denial of water quality certification. Construction work currently underway includes the channel stabilization at bridge, utility and tributary crossings in the uncompleted portion of the project. 2 Project was in useful operation before Corps started working on it. Work consists primarily of improvements to existing channels, levees, pumping stations and other flood control structures. 3 Item 2A temporarily deferred. 4 Levee enlargement remains to be accomplished for 0.8 miles. 5 Awaiting financial completion pending sponsor's submission of final LERRD credit request. 6 Completion of project depended upon the receipt of adequate funding. SLandscaping remains to be accomplished. 8 Recreation contract award is unscheduled. B-15 APPENDIX B Beach Erosion Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 1998 Project Atlantic Coast of Maryland Delaware Coast Protection, DE Cape May Inlet to Lower Twp, NJ Carlsbab Seawall, CA (Sec 103) Carolina Beach and Vicinity, NC - Area South Carolina Beach and Vicinity, NC - Carolina Beach Portion Casino Beach, IL Dade County, FL Duval County, FL East Rockaway to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, NY Emeryville, Alameda, CA (Sec 103) Fire Island to Jones Inlet, NY Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, NY Great Egg Harbor Inlet & Peck Beach, NJ Homer Spit storm Damage Reduction, AK Lummi Shore Road, WA (Sec 103) Martin County, FL Myrtle Beach, SC Panama City Beaches, FL Pinellas County, FL (Long Key) Presque Isle Peninsula, PA (Permanent) Rockaway Inlet to Norton Point (Coney Island), NY Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet, Sec 1 Sarasota County, FL Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach, CA (Stage 10) Fiscal Year Started 1990 1989 1990 1996 1996 1965 1995 1994 1994 1979 1993 1988 1963 1991 1992 1998 1996 1995 1997 1995 1990 1994 1994 1994 1997 Placed in Useful Operation 1994 1990 1991 1997 1998 1982 1993 1992 1994 1998 1993 1995 Incremental Fiscal Year Completed or Scheduled for Completion 2043 2021 2041 1997 2046 2014 Indefinite 1997 1997 2006 1993 2039 2027 2043 1995 1999 1997 2047 1999 1997 20423 2045 2049 19974 B-16 APPENDIX B Beach Erosion Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 1998 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Useful Completed or Year Operation Scheduled for Project Started Completion Town of North Beach, MD Virginia Beach, VA (Reimbursement) Virginia Beach, VA Wrightsville Beach, NC 1993 1962 1996 1965 1994 1962 1966 1994 20122 2051 Indefinite B-17 APPENDIX B Beach Erosion Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 1998 Emergency Repairs due to Hurricane Andrew as per FY 92 Dire Emergency Act authorization. Original authorized project completed in 1991. 2 IAW Section 355 of WRDA 1996, the project will be extended until the earlier of; year 2012 or completion of the beach erosion control and hurricane Protection project at Virginia Beach, Virginia. 3 Fiscal year 1997 was the fifth year of 50 years of nourishment. 4 Periodic beach nourishment. B-18 APPENDIX B Environmental Restoration Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 1998 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Chesapeake Bay Oyster Recovery, MD Dead Lake, AL Kissimmee River, FL Lake Seminole Habitat, FL Murphy's Slough, CA (Sec 1135) North Fork Feather River, Chester, CA (Sec 1135) Numana Dam, CA (Sec 1135) Pine Flat Bypass, CA (Sec 1135) Poplar Island, MD Sammamish River Weir Restoration, WA (Sec 1135) So. WV (Gilbert, WV) Sewage Treatment Plant South Fork, Putah Creek, CA (Sec 1135) Thornton Creek, WA (Sec 1135) Twenty Mile Creek Habitat, MS Vic Fazio Yolo Wildlife Area, CA (Sec 1135) 1995 1998 1989 1998 1998 1994 1998 1998 1997 1998 1998 1998 1998 1997 1992 1995 1998 1999 2000 1998 2009 1999 2000 2000 1999 2000 2005 1999 2001 1999 1998 1999 Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration B-19 Appendix C Navigation Locks and Dams Operable September 30, 1998 River/ River Chamber Depth on Sills Dam Year Channel Lock Mile Community Width Length Lift Upper Lower Type Length Open Length Depth Aiww Between Norfolk, Va & St. Johns River, Fl Deep Creek 10.6 Chesapeake, Va 52 300 12 12 12 Miter 1940 22.0 50 Great Bridge 11.5 Chesapeake, Va 75 540 3 16 16 Miter 1932 6.0 12 South Mills 33.2 South Mills, Nc 52 300 12 12 12 Miter 1941 22.0 6 Alabama-Coosa Rivers Claiborne 117.5 Claiborne, Al 84 600 30 16 13 Moveable 1603.0 1969 61.0 9 Millers Ferry 178.0 Camden, Al 84 600 45 16 13 Moveable 9900.0 1969 103.0 9 Robert F. Henry 281.2 Benton, Al 84 600 45 16 13 Moveable 1496.0 1972 88.0 9 Allegheny 2 6.7 Aspinwall,Pa 56 360 11 11 12 Miter 1393.0 1934 8.0 9 3 14.5 Cheswick, Pa 56 360 14 12 11 Miter 1436.0 1934 10.0 9 4 24.2 Natrona, Pa 56 360 11 9 10 Miter 876.0 927 6.0 9 5 30.4 Freeport, Pa 56 360 12 10 11 Miter 780.0 1927 6.0 9 6 36.3 Clinton, Pa 56 360 12 1 1 Miter 1140.0 1928 9.0 9 7 45.7 Kittanning, Pa 56 360 13 11 10 Miter 916.0 1930 7.0 9 8 52.6 Templeton, Pa 56 360 18 14 10 Miter 984.0 931 10.0 9 9 62.2 Rimer, Pa 56 360 22 11 11 Miter 950.0 1938 10.0 9 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, And Flint Rivers George W. Andrews 46.7 Columbia, Ga 82 450 253 13 MMoovv6ea2b le 620.0 19 29.0 9 Walter F. George 75.1 FortGaines,Ga 82 450 88 18 13 Moveable 1337.0 1963 85.0 9 Jim Woodruff 106.3 Chattahoochee, FI 82 450 33 14 14 Moveable 5924.0 1954 47.0 6 Bayou Teche, La Keystone 72.0 New Iberia, La 36 160 8 9 8 Miter 175.0 1913 35.0 6 Bayou Teche, La (Fcmr&T) Berwick 1.5 Berwick, La 45 300 14 9 9 Sector 1950 125.0 8 East & West Calumet 4.0 , La 45 90 0 0 0 Sector 1950 80.0 8 Charenton 35.7 Charenton, La 45 0 0 0 0 Sector 1949 80.0 8 Black Rock Channel & Tonawanda Harbor Black Rock 4.0 Buffalo, Ny 70 625 5 22 22 Replaced 1914 6.0 21 Width 50 200 50 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 100 100 100 S 80 80 80 80 200 C-1 Appendix C Navigation Locks and Dams Operable September 30, 1998 River/ River Chamber Depth on Sills Dam Year Channel Lock Mile Community Width Length Lift Upper Lower Type Length Open Length Depth Black Warrior & Tombigbee Rivers, Al Coffeeville 116.6 Coffeeville, Al 110 600 34 13 13 Moveable 1185.0 1960 97.0 9 Demopolis 213.2 Demopolis, Al 110 600 40 13 13 Moveable 1485.0 1954 48.0 9 Armistead I. Seldon 262.0 Eutaw, Al 110 600 22 13 13 Moveable 1832.0 1957 77.0 9 William Bacon Oliver 337.6 Tuscaloosa, Wa 110 600 28 18 18 Moveable 800.0 1991 43.0 9 Holt 347.0 Holt, Al 110 600 64 19 13 Moveable 138.0 1966 18.0 9 John Hollis Bankhead 366.0 Adger, Al 1 0 600 68 13 13 Moveable 1170.0 1975 43.0 9 Calcasieu River And Pass, La Calcasieu Barrier 38.9 West Lake, La 56 575 0 0 0 Sector 450 1968 15.0 13 Canaveral Harbor Canaveral 3.0 Cape Canaveral, Fl 90 600 3 13 13 Sector 0.0 1965 6.0 12 Cape Fear River 1 39.0 Kings Bluff, Nc 40 200 II 9 9 Miter 275.0 1915 32.0 8 2 71.0 Browns Landing, Nc 40 200 9 12 12 Miter 229.0 1917 24.0 8 William O. Huske 95.0 Tolars Landing, Nc 40 300 9 9 9 Miter 220.0 1935 20.0 8 Chicago Harbor Chicago 327.2 Chicago, II 80 600 4 27 23 Sector 2100 1939 1.0 21 Colorado River Colorado River East 441.1 Matagorda, Tx 125 1180 12 15 15 Sector 520 1944 3,700.0 12 Colorado River West 441.8 Matagorda, Tx 125 1180 12 15 15 Replaced 520 1944 3,700.0 12 Columbia River Bonneville 145.3 Cascade Locks, Or 86 650 65 19 24 Miter 2680.0 1993 1,080.0 14 The Dalles 191.7 The Dalles, Or 86 650 88 15 15 Vertical 8735.0 1957 1,000.0 14 John Day 216.5 Rufus, Or 86 650 110 15 15 Vertical 5900.0 1968 1,600.0 14 Mcnary 292.0 Plymouth, Wa 86 650 83 15 20 Miter 7365.0 1953 64.0 14 C-2 l Width 200 200 200 200 200 200 56 100 100 100 100 470 125 125 300 250 250 250 Appendix C Navigation Locks and Dams Operable September 30, 1998 River/ River Chamber Depth on Sills Dam Year Channel Lock Mile Community Width Length Lift Upper Lower Type Length Open Length Depth Cumberland River, Tn & Ky Barkley 30.6 Grand Rivers, Ky 110 800 57 24 13 Miter 9959.0 1964 118.0 9 Cheatham 148.7 Ashland City, Tn 110 800 26 14 12 Miter 801.0 1952 68.0 9 Old Hickory 216.2 Old Hickory, Tn 84 400 60 14 13 Miter 3605.0 1954 97.0 9 Cordell Hull 313.5 Carthage, Tn 84 400 59 14 13 Miter 1138.0 1973 72.0 9 Freshwater Bayou, La Freshwater Bayou 1.2 Intracoastal Cit, La 84 590 4 16 16 Sector 401.0 1968 250.0 12 Giww Between Apalachee Bay, Fi & Mexican Border Algiers 0.0 Algiers, La 75 760 18 13 13 Sector 1956 384.0 Harvey 0.0 Harvey, La 75 415 20 12 12 Miter 1935 384.0 12 Inner Harbor Nvg Chnl 5.6 New Orleans, La 75 626 17 31 31 Miter 923 384.0 12 Bayou Sorrel 37.5 Plaquemine, La 56 790 21 14 14 Sector 952 64.0 12 Port Allen 64.1 Port Allen,La 84 1188 45 13 14 Miter 961 64.0 12 Bayou Boeuf 93.3 Morgan City, La 75 1148 11 13 13 Sector 0.0 1954 384.0 16 Leland Bowman 1 62.7 Abbeville, La 110 1190 5 II 1 11 Sector 985 384.0 16 Calcasieu 238.5 Lake Charles, La 75 1194 4 13 13 Sector 0.0 950 384.0 16 Brazos East 400.4 Freeport, Tx 75 260 0 15 15 Sector 520 943 3,700.0 12 Brazos West 400.9 Freeport, Tx 75 260 0 15 15 Sector 520 943 3,700.0 12 Green And Barren Rivers,Ky 1 9.1 Spottsville, Ky 84 600 8 12 15 Miter 482.0 1956 54.0 9 2 63.1 Calhoun, Ky 84 600 14 12 12 Miter 519.0 1956 45.0 9 Hudson River Troy 153.8 Troy, Ny 45 493 17 16 13 Fixed 1.0 1916 2.0 14 C-3 l SWidth 300 200 150 150 120 150 120 150 120 120 150 200 200 125 125 150 150 200 Appendix C Navigation Locks and Dams Operable September 30, 1998 River/ River Chamber Depth on Sills Dam Year Channe Lock Mile Community Width Length Lift Upper Lower Type Length Open Length Depth Illinois Waterway Lagrange 80.2 Beardstown, 1 110 600 10 16 13 Miter 1066 1939 78.0 Peoria 157.7 Creve Coeur, 11 110 600 11 15 12 Miter 3446 1938 73.0 Starved Rock 231.0 Uitca, 11 110 600 19 17 14 Miter 1280 1933 14.0 Marseilles 244.6 Marseilles, II 110 600 24 19 14 Miter 778.5 1933 27.0 Dresden Island 271.5 Morris, 11 110 600 22 17 12 Miter 1615.5 1933 15.0 Brandon Road 286.0 Joliet, 11 110 600 34 18 14 Miter 2373 1933 5.0 Lockport 291.1 Lockport, 1 110 600 40 20 15 Miter 500 1933 35.0 Thomas J. O'Brien 326.5 Chicago, II 110 1000 4 18 18 Sector 256.75 1960 7.0 Kanawha Lock & Dam, Washington l Width 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 160 9 300 9 300 31.1 Winfield, Wv 31.1 Winfield, Wv 31.1 Winfield, Wv 67.7 Marmet, Wv 67.7 Marmet, Wv 82.8 London, Wv 82.8 London, Wv 110 56 56 56 56 56 56 0.8 Modoc, I1 800 28 360 28 360 28 360 24 360 24 360 24 360 24 84 600 29 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 Miter 12 Miter 12 Miter 12 Miter 12 Miter 12 Miter 12 Miter 19 11 Miter 700.0 1997 700.0 1937 700.0 1937 557.0 1934 557.0 1934 557.0 1934 557.0 1933 120.0 1973 C-4 Winfield Marmet London Kaskaskia River Kaskaskia 37.0 37.0 37.0 16.0 16.0 8.0 8.0 35.0 300 300 300 150 150 150 150 9 225 Appendix C Navigation Locks and Dams Operable September 30, 1998 River/ River Chamber Depth on Sills Dam Year Channel Lock Mile Community Width Length Lift Upper Lower Type Length Open Length Depth Kentucky River, Ky I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 4.0 Carrollton, Ky 31.0 Lockport, Ky 42.0 Gest, Ky 65.0 Frankfort, Ky 82.2 Tyrone, Ky 96.2 High Bridge, Ky 117.0 High Bridge, Ky 139.9 Camp Nelson, Ky 157.5 Valley View, Ky 176.4 Ford, Ky 201.0 Irvine, Ky 220.9 Ravenna, Ky 239.9 Willow, Ky 249.0 Heidelberg, Ky 38 38 38 38 38 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 145 8 145 14 145 13 145 13 145 15 147 14 147 15 146 19 148 17 148 17 148 18 148 17 148 18 148 17 8 8 9 6 10 9 9 11 11 9 10 10 10 9 15 Miter 6 Fixed 6 Miter 7 Fixed 6 Fixed 6 Fixed 7 Fixed 6 Fixed 7 Fixed 6 Fixed 6 Fixed 6 Fixed 6 Fixed 6 Fixed 424.0 1839 400.0 1839 465.0 1844 534.0 1844 556.0 1844 413.0 1891 350.0 1897 257.0 1900 362.0 1907 472.0 1907 208.0 1906 240.0 1973 248.0 1915 248.0 1917 Lake Washington Ship Canal Hiram M. Chittenden 1.3 Seattle, Wa 1.3 Seattle, Wa 28 80 123 26 16 760 26 36 C-5 Width 27.0 11.0 23.0 17.0 14.0 21.0 23.0 18.0 19.0 25.0 20.0 19.0 9.0 26.0 150 150 150 150 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 0 100 16 Miter 29 Miter 235.0 1916 235.0 1916 0.0 8.0 30 30 --------- Appendix C Navigation Locks and Dams Operable September 30, 1998 River/ River Chamber Depth on Sills Dam Year Channe Lock Mile Community Width Length Lift Upper Lower Type Length Open Length Depth Mcclellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System Norrell 10.3 Arkansas Post, Ar 110 600 30 16 15 Fixed 277.0 1967 3.0 9 2 13.3 Arkansas Post, Ar 110 600 20 18 14 Sector 6300.0 1967 37.0 9 Joe Hardin 50.2 Grady, Ar 110 600 20 18 14 Sector 2240.0 1968 16.0 9 Emmett Sanders 66.0 Pine Bluff, Ar 110 600 14 18 14 Sector 5.0 1968 20.0 9 5 86.3 Redfield, Ar 110 600 17 18 14 Sector 7455.0 1968 22.0 9 David D. Terry 108.1 Little Rock, Ar 1 10 600 18 18 14 Sector 4040.0 1968 17.0 9 Murray 125.4 Little Rock, Ar 1I10 600 18 18 14 Sector 3530.0 1969 31.0 Toad Suck Ferry 155.9 Conway, Ar 110 600 16 18 14 Sector 1200.0 1969 21.0 Arthur V. Ormond 176.9 Morrilton, Ar 110 600 19 18 14 Sector 1797.0 1969 29.0 Dardanelle 205.5 Russellville, Ar 110 600 55 18 14 Sector 1210.0 1969 51.0 Ozark - Jeta Taylor 256.8 Ozark, Ar 110 600 34 18 15 Sector 900.0 1969 36.0 James W. Trimble 292.8 Fort Smith, Ar 110 600 20 18 14 Sector 4260.0 1969 27.0 W.D. Mayo 319.6 Spiro, Ok 110 600 21 14 14 Moveable 7400.0 1970 17.0 Robert S. Kerr 336.2 Salisaw, Ok 110 600 48 16 14 Moveable 7230.0 1970 30.0 Webbers Falls 366.6 Webber Falls, Ok 110 600 30 16 14 Moveable 4370.0 1970 35.0 Chouteau 401.4 Muskogee, Ok 110 600 21 15 14 Moveable I 1690. 1970 20.0 Newt Graham Lock 421.6 Inola, Ok 110 600 21 15 14 Moveable 1630.0 1970 23.0 Mermentau River, La Schooner Bayou 3.4 Abbeville, La 75 525 0 0 0 Sector 1950 11.0 Catfish Point 25.0 Creole, La 56 500 0 0 0 Sector 1951 5.0 15 C-6 l Width S 300 300 250 250 9 250 9 250 9 250 250 9 250 9 250 9 250 9 250 9 250 9 250 9 250 9 150 9 150 5 60 5 200 Appendix C Navigation Locks and Dams Operable September 30, 1998 River/ River Chamber Depth on Sills Dam Year Channel Lock Mile Community Width Length Lift Upper Lower Type Length Open Length Depth Mississippi R Betwn Missouri R & Minneapolis, Mn Melvin Price 200.8 East Alton, I1 200.8 East Alton, II 25 241.4 Winfield, Mo 24 273.4 Clarksville, Mo 22 301.2 Saverton, Mo 21 324.9 Quincy, II 20 343.2 Canton, Mo 19 364.2 Keokuk, la 18 410.5 Gladstone, 1 17 437.1 New Boston, II 16 457.2 Muscatine, II 15 482.9 Rock Island, II 482.9 Rock Island, II 14 493.0 Leclaire, la 493.0 Leclaire, la 13 523.0 Clinton, 11 12 556.0 Bellevue, la 11 583.0 Dubuque, la 10 615.0 Guttenburg, la 9 647.0 Lynxville, Wi 8 679.0 Genoa, Wi 7 702.0 Dresbach, Mn 6 714.0 Trempealeau, Wi 5A 728.5 Winona,Mn, Mn 5 738.1 Minneiska, Mn 4 752.8 Alma, Wi 3 796.9 Red Wing, Mn 2 815.0 Hastings, Mn 1 847.6 Minn. St. Paul, Mn 847.6 Minn. St. Paul, Mn Lower Saint Anthony Falls 853.3 Minneapolis, Mn Upper Saint Anthony Falls 853.9 Minneapolis, Mn Width 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 80 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 56 56 56 56 1200 24 600 24 600 15 600 15 600 10 600 10 600 10 1200 38 600 10 600 8 600 9 360 16 600 16 600 11 320 11 600 11 600 9 600 11 600 8 600 9 600 1il 600 8 600 6 600 5 600 9 600 7 600 8 500 12 400 38 400 38 400 25 400 49 23 42 19 19 18 17 15 15 17 16 17 27 27 18 21 19 17 19 15 16 22 18 17 18 18 17 17 22 13 13 14 16 18 Vertical 18 Miter 12 Miter 12 Miter 14 Miter 12 Moveable 12 Moveable 13 Fixed 14 Moveable 13 Moveable 12 Moveable 11 Moveable 11 Moveable 11 Moveable 14 Moveable 13 Moveable 13 Moveable 13 Moveable 12 Miter 13 Miter 14 Miter 12 Miter 13 Miter 13 Miter 12 Miter 13 Miter 14 Miter 13 Miter 10 Miter 8 Miter 10 Miter 14 Miter 990.0 990.0 1140.0 1200.0 3084.0 2955.0 2144.0 8809.0 6960 3196 3555.0 1203.0 1203.0 2703.0 2703.0 14075 8369 4784 763.0 811.0 935.0 940.0 893.0 682.0 1.0 1.0 365.0 822.0 574.0 574.0 188.0 3.0 1990 1994 1939 1940 1938 1938 1936 1957 1937 1939 1937 1934 1934 1939 1922 1938 1938 1937 1936 1938 1937 1937 1936 1936 1935 1935 1938 1930 1932 1930 1959 1963 40.0 40.0 32.0 27.0 24.0 18.0 21.0 46.0 27.0 20.0 26.0 0.0 10.0 29.0 29.0 34.0 26.0 32.0 33.0 31.0 23.0 12.0 14.0 10.0 15.0 44.0 18.0 32.0 6.0 6.0 1.0 4.0 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 200 100 C-7 Appendix C Navigation Locks and Dams Operable September 30, 1998 River/ River Chamber Depth on Sills Dam Year Channel Lock Mile Community Width Length Lift Upper Lower Type Length Open Length Depth Mississippi R Betwn Ohio And Missouri Rivers 27 185.5 Granite City, 11 110 600 21 15 15 Miter 3000.0 1953 15.0 9 185.5 Granite City, I1 110 1200 21 15 15 Vertical 3000.0 1953 15.0 9 Monongahela River 11.2 Braddock, Pa 11.2 Braddock, Pa 23.8 Elizabeth, Pa 23.8 Elizabeth, Pa 41.5 Monessen, Pa 41.5 Monessen, Pa 61.2 Maxwell, Pa 61.2 Maxwell, Pa 82.0 Grays Landing, Pa 90.8 Point Marion, Pa 102.0 Morgantown, Wv 108.0 Morgantown, Wv 115.4 Opekiska, Wv 56 110 56 56 56 56 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 360 9 720 9 720 8 360 8 720 17 360 17 720 20 720 20 720 15 720 19 600 17 600 21 600 22 15 15 11 11 20 20 20 20 27 16 17 14 18 16 Miter 16 Miter 11 Miter 11 Miter 10 Miter 10 Miter 14 Miter 14 Miter 18 Miter 35 Miter 14 Miter 15 Miter 14 Miter 748.0 1905 748.0 1905 670.0 1907 670.0 1907 535.0 1932 535.0 1932 460.0 1'63 460.0 1963 576.0 1993 682.0 1994 410.0 1950 530.0 1959 366.0 1964 C-8 3 4 Maxwell Grays Landing Pt. Marion Morgantown Hildebrand Opekiska Width 350 350 13.0 13.0 18.0 18.0 20.0 20.0 24.0 24.0 21.0 11.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 Appendix C Navigation Locks and Dams Operable September 30, 1998 River/ River Chamber Depth on Sills Dam Year Channel Lock Mile Community Width Length Lift Upper Lower Type Length Open Length Depth Ohio River Emsworth Dashields Montgomery New Cumberland Pike Island Hannibal Willow Island Belleville Racine Robert C. Byrd Greenup Captain Anthony Meldahl Markland Mcalpine Cannelton Newburgh John T. Myers Smithland 6.2 Emsworth, Pa 6.2 Emsworth, Pa 13.3 Glenwillard, Pa 13.3 Glenwillard, Pa 31.7 Monaca, Pa 31.7 Monaca, Pa 54.4 Stratton, Oh 54.4 Stratton, Oh 84.2 Warwood, Wv 84.2 Warwood, Wv 126.4 Hannibal, Oh 126.4 Hannibal, Oh 161.7 Newport, Oh 161.7 Newport, Oh 203.9 Reedsville, Oh 203.9 Reedsville, Oh 237.5 Letart, Wv 237.5 Letart, Wv 279.2 Hogsett, Wv 279.2 Hogsett, Wv 341.0 Greenup, Ky 341.0 Greenup, Ky 436.2 Chilo, Oh 436.2 Chilo, Oh 531.5 Markland, Ky 531.5 Warsaw, Ky 606.8 Louisville, Ky 606.8 Louisville, Ky 720.7 Cannelton, In 720.7 Cannelton, In 776.1 Newburgh, In 776.1 Newburgh, In 846.0 Mount Vernon, In 846.0 Mount Vernon, In 918.5 Hamletsburg, II 918.5 Hamletsburg, II 56 360 18 110 600 18 110 600 10 56 360 10 110 600 18 56 360 18 110 1200 21 110 600 21 110 1200 18 110 600 18 110 600 21 110 1200 21 110 600 20 110 1200 20 110 600 22 110 1200 22 110 600 22 110 1200 22 110 1200 23 110 600 23 110 1200 30 110 600 30 110 1200 30 110 600 30 110 600 35 110 1200 35 110 600 37 110 1200 37 110 1200 25 110 600 25 110 1200 16 110 600 16 110 600 18 110 1200 18 110 1200 22 110 1200 22 16 17 13 13 16 16 17 17 17 17 38 38 35 35 37 37 37 37 41 41 45 45 45 45 50 50 19 49 40 40 31 31 34 34 34 34 13 Miter 13 Miter 18 Miter 18 Miter 15 Miter 15 Miter 15 Miter 15 Miter 18 Miter 18 Miter 17 Miter 17 Miter 15 Miter 15 Miter 15 Miter 15 Miter 15 Miter 15 Miter 18 Miter 18 Miter 15 Miter 15 Miter 15 Miter 15 Miter 15 Miter 15 Miter 11 Miter 12 Miter 15 Miter 15 Miter 15 Miter 15 Miter 16 Miter 16 Miter 12 Miter 12 Miter 1717.0 1921 1717.0 1921 1585.0 1929 1585.0 1929 1379.0 1936 1379.0 1936 1315.0 1959 1315.0 1959 1315.0 1965 1315.0 1965 1098.0 1973 1098.0 1973 1128.0 1972 1128.0 1972 1206.0 1969 1206.0 1969 1173.0 1969 1173.0 1969 1132.0 1993 1132.0 1993 1287.0 1959 1287.0 1959 1756.0 1962 1756.0 1962 1395.0 1959 1395.0 1959 8725 1961 8725 1961 2054.0 1971 2054.0 1971 2275.6 1975 2275.6 1975 3504.0 1975 3504.0 1975 2962.0 1980 2962.0 1980 C-9 Width 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 18.0 18.0 23.0 23.0 30.0 30.0 36.0 36.0 35.0 35.0 36.0 36.0 34.0 34.0 42.0 42.0 62.0 62.0 95.0 95.0 75.0 95.0 75.0 75.0 114.0 114.0 55.0 55.0 70.0 70.0 73.0 73.0 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 Appendix C Navigation Locks and Dams Operable September 30, 1998 River/ River Chamber Depth on Sills Dam Year Channe Lock Mile Community Width Length Lift Upper Lower Type Length Open Length Depth 52 938.9 Brookport, ll 110 600 12 15 11 Miter 2978.0 1928 20.0 9 938.9 Brookport, II 110 1200 12 15 11 Miter 2998.0 1969 20.0 9 53 962.6 Mound City, II 110 1200 12 15 10 Miter 3560.0 1980 24.0 9 962.6 Mound City, II 110 600 12 15 10 Miter 3560.0 1929 24.0 9 Okeechobee Waterway, Fl St. Lucie 15.3 Stuart, FI 50 225 13 14 12 Sector 170.0 1941 15.0 8 Port Mayaca 38.5 Port Mayaca, FI 56 400 2 14 14 Sector 116.0 1977 5.0 8 Moore Haven 78.0 Moore Haven, Fl 50 250 2 10 11 Sector 89.8 1953 16.0 8 Ortona 93.6 Labelle, FI 50 225 11 12 11 Sector 104.0 1937 16.0 8 W. P. Franklin 122.0 Fort Myers, Fl 56 400 3 13 13 Sector 1150.0 1965 8.0 8 Old River, La (Mr&T) Old River 304.0 Simmesport, La 75 1190 35 11 11 Miter 1100 1963 7.0 Ouachita And Black Rivers Below Camden, Ar Jonesville 25.0 Jonesville, La 84 600 30 18 15 Moveable 450.0 1972 92.0 Columbia 117.2 Columbia, La 84 600 18 18 18 Moveable 400.0 1972 109.0 9 Felsenthal 226.8 Felsenthal, La 84 600 18 18 13 Moveable 350.0 1984 55.0 9 H. K. Thatcher 281.7 Calion, La 84 600 12 18 13 Moveable 350.0 1984 50.0 7 Pearl River Lateral Canal 29.7 Pearl River, La 40.8 Bush, La 43.9 Sun, La 65 65 65 274 27 274 15 274 11 10 10 10 10 Moveable 10 Moveable 10 Moveable 0.0 1949 1950 1950 11.0 3.0 5.0 l Width 300 300 300 300 80 100 90 90 g 90 2 120 100 100 100 7 100 80 80 80 Red River Ww-Mississippi R To Shreveport, La Lindy Claibomrne Boggs 44.0 Larto, John H.Overton 74.0 Ruby, 3 4 Joe D. Waggonner La La 116.4 Colfax, La 169.0 Coushatta, La 200.0 Caspiana, La 84 84 84 84 84 685 36 685 24 685 31 685 25 685 25 22 23 25 25 22 13 Moveable 23 Moveable 18 Moveable 18 Miter 23 Miter 630.0 1984 348.0 1987 1992 690.0 1994 663.0 1994 C-10 Savannah River New Savannah Bluff 187.2 Augusta, Sc 56 360 15 14 12 Miter 360.0 1937 16.0 30.0 42.0 40.0 31.0 28.0 200 200 100 200 200 90 9 Appendix C Navigation Locks and Dams Operable September 30, 1998 River/ River Chamber Depth on Sills Dam Year Channel Lock Mile Community Width Length Lift Upper Lower Type Length Open Length Depth Snake River Ice Harbor 9.7 Pasco, Wa 86 650 103 14 15 Vertical 2790.0 1962 32.0 14 Lower Monumental 41.6 Kahlotus, Wa 86 650 103 19 15 Vertical 3800.0 1969 29.0 14 Little Goose 70.3 Starbuck, Wa 86 650 101 20 15 Miter 2655.0 1970 37.0 14 Lower Granite 107.5 Pomeroy, Wa 86 650 105 20 15 Miter 3200.0 1975 38.0 14 St. Marys River, Mi Davis 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, Mi 80 1320 22 24 23 Leaf 1914 0.0 0 Macarthur 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, Mi 80 780 22 31 31 Leaf 1300.0 1943 0.0 27 New Poe 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, Mi 110 1200 22 32 32 Leaf 1300.0 1963 0.0 0 Tennessee River, Tn, AI, And Ky Pickwick Landing 206.7 Pickwick Dam, Tn, Tn 110 600 55 16 17 Fixed 7385.0 1937 53.0 9 Guntersville 349.0 Guntersville, Al 60 360 39 17 18 Sector 3837.0 1937 76.0 9 Tennessee River, Tn, Al, And Ky Kentucky 22.4 Grand Rivers, Ky 110 600 57 24 13 Miter 7976.0 1942 184.0 9 Melton Hill 23.1 Kingston, Tn 75 400 58 13 13 Sector 1072.0 1963 38.0 9 Pickwick Landing 206.7 Pickwick Dam, Tn, Tn 110 1000 55 19 17 Fixed 7385.0 1984 53.0 9 Wilson 259.4 Florence, AI 110 600 94 11 11 Fixed 3728.0 1959 16.0 9 259.4 Florence, Al 60 300 49 13 13 Miter 3728.0 1927 16.0 9 259.4 Florence, Al 60 300 45 11 11 Fixed 3728.0 1927 16.0 9 General Joseph Wheeler 274.9 Rogersville, Al 60 400 48 15 13 Fixed 5738.0 1934 74.0 9 274.9 Rogersville, Al 110 600 48 15 13 Fixed 5738.0 1963 74.0 9 Guntersville 349.0 Guntersville, Al 110 600 39 17 18 Miter 3837.0 1965 76.0 9 Nickajack 424.7 Jasper, Tn 110 600 39 13 11 Miter 3763.0 1967 46.0 9 Chickamauga 471.0 Chattanooga, Tn 60 360 49 10 14 Miter 5654.0 1937 59.0 9 Watts Bar 529.9 Breendenton, Tn 60 360 58 12 12 Sector 2646.0 1941 72.0 9 Ft. Loudon 602.3 Lenoir City, Tn 60 360 72 12 12 Sector 3687.0 1943 50.0 9 C-11 Width 250 250 250 250 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 Appendix C Navigation Locks and Dams Operable September 30, 1998 River/ River Chamber Depth on Sills Dam Year Channe Lock Mile Community Width Length Lift Upper Lower Type Length Open Length Dept Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway Al, Ms Howell Heflin 266.1 Gainesville, Al 110 600 36 15 15 Moveable 1546.0 1978 49.0 Tom Bevill 306.8 Aliceville, Al 110 600 27 15 15 Moveable 1479.0 1979 41.0 John C. Stennis 334.7 Columbus, Ms 110 600 27 15 15 Moveable 1004.0 1980 28.0 Aberdeen 357.5 Aberdeen, Ms 110 600 27 15 15 Moveable 1064.0 1985 23.0 Amory 371.1 Amory, Ms 110 600 30 15 15 Moveable 0.0 1985 14.0 Glover Wilkins 376.3 Smith.Sville, Al 110 600 25 18 18 Moveable 0.0 1985 15.0 Fulton 391.0 Fulton, Ms 110 600 25 18 18 Moveable 0.0 1985 7.0 John E. Rankin 398.4 Fulton, Ms 110 600 30 18 18 Moveable 0.0 1985 8.0 G.V. "Sonny" Montgomery 406.7 Belmont, Ms 110 600 30 18 18 Moveable 0.0 1985 5.0 Jamie Whitten 411.9 Tupelo, Ms 110 600 84 18 18 Moveable 1064.0 1985 65.0 Willamette River At Willamette Falls Willamette Falls Locks 26.0 West Linn, Or Williamette Falls Guard Lock 26.4 West Linn, Or 40 40 198 20 198 10 8 Leaf 8 Leaf 0.0 1873 0.0 1873 0.0 24.0 h Width 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 150 150 C-12 APPENDIX D Navigation Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 1998 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Agat Small Boat Harbor, Guam (Sec 107) AIWW Replacement of Federal Hwy Bridges in NC Aquadilla Harbor, PR (Sec 107) Baltimore Harbor (50 foot), MD & VA Bonneville Navigation Lock, OR & WA Boston Harbor, MA Brazos Island Harbor, TX Burns Harbor, IN Canaveral Harbor Deepening, FL Canaveral Harbor, FL Cape Fear Lock and Dam No. 1, Fish Ladder, NC Channel to Newport News, VA (1965 Mod.) Channel to Newport News, VA (1986 Mod.) Channel to Victoria, TX Charleston Harbor (Deeping/Widening), SC Chicago Harbor (Lock), IL Chicago Harbor (Lock), IL Columbia River, Seafarers Memorial, Hammond, OR Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX Crescent City Harbor, CA Erie Harbor, NY 1987 1974 1993 1987 1985 1998 1992 1995 1993 1994 1996 1967 1987 1993 1998 1995 1996 1991 1972 1998 1997 1989 1986' 1990 1995 1997 1968 1989 1990 1989 2001 1995 1993 1998 2000 1998 1999 1994 1995 1998 Indefinite Indefinite 2001 2003 1997 1997 Indefinite 1997 1999 1998 Dredging and breakwater Replacement of existing bridges Breakwater Deepdraft channel deepening New larger lock Channel deepening Enlarging and Deepening Deep Draft Channel to 42 foot depth Breakwater Rehabilitation Navigation Channels Jetty extension and sand tightening Project Modification for Improvement of environment Deferred anchorage construction Dredge 50 ft. Channel. Deepen to 55 feet Enlarging and deepening channel to 12 foot depth Deepen Entrance Channel to 47 feet and inner channels to 45 feet depth. Lock Bulkhead Fabrication Construct Slots to Dewater Lock Gate Bays Construction of support structure Dredging Deepen Channel Dredge Access Channel and Berthing Area D-1 APPENDIX D Navigation Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 1998 Project Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area, IN and KY Fort Pierce Harbor, FL Four Locks, Illinois Waterway, IL Freeport Harbor, TX Grays Harbor, Point Chehalis, WA (Sec 111) Grays Harbor, WA Grays Landing Lock & Dam (Lock & Dam 7) Monongahela River, PA Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Aransas National Wildlife Refuge, TX (Sec 216) Gulfport Harbor, MS Helena Harbor, AR Hempstead Harbor, NY Houston-Galveston Navigation Channels, TX Humboldt Harbor and Bay Deepening, CA Hyannis Harbor, MA (Sec 107) Illinois Waterway Four Locks Kawaihae Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, HI Kentucky Lock Addition, KY Kill Van Kull - Newark Bay, NJ and NY (Stage 1) Kill Van Kull - Newark Bay, NJ and NY (Stage II) Kodiak Harbor, AK Fiscal Year Started 1984 1995 1993 1987 1995 1990 1986 1998 1991 1989 1992 1998 1997 1997 1993 1996 1998 1986 1999 1993 Placed in Useful Operation 1998 1991 1997 1994 Fiscal Year Completed or Scheduled for Completion 1998 1996 1996 1998 1998 2001 2001 2001 (6) 1995 1995 2003 2000 1999 1996 1998 2010 1995 Indefinite 1996 Nature of Project Protection of a National Natural Landmark Enlarge entrance channel Major rehabilitation of lock and dam Dredging, jetty construction, and recreation Mitigate Shore Damages Navigation channel widening and deepening Construct new lock & dam to replace existing lock & dam 7 Bank Protection to protect Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and the critical habitat of endangered whooping crane Deepen Channel New Slackwater Harbor Removal of derelect barges Deepen and Widen Houston Ship Channel and Galveston Harbor and Channel Deepening and Widen channel Channel deependng and realignment Major rehabilitation of locks and dams Breakwater Lock Addition (1200 feet) Deepdraft channel - widening and deepening to 40 ft Deepdraft channel - widening and deepening to 45 ft Breakwater and navigation channel widening D-2 . I APPENDIX D Navigation Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 1998 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Laupahoehoe Harbor, Hawaii, HI 1988 1988 1988 Lock and Dams 2, 3 and 4, Monongahela, PA and WV 1992 2008 Lock and Dam 3, MN Lock and Dams 3, 5A, 6,7,8 and 9, MN, WI and IA Lock and Dam 13, IL Lock and Dam 14, IL Lock and Dam 15, IL Lock and Dam 24, MO Lock and Dam 25, MO Los Angeles Harbor, CA McAlpine Lock and Dam McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, AR Manatee Harbor, FL Marmet Locks & Dam, WV Melvin Price Lock and Dam, IL and MO Miami Harbor Channel, FL Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers IL and MO Mississippi River, Ship Channel, Gulf to Baton Rouge, LA Missouri River Fish and Wildlife Mitigation, IA, NE, KS and MO 1998 1989 1993 1996 1993 1996 1994 1996 1996 1963 1995 1998 1974 1991 1910 1987 1992 2002 2005 1938 1939 1934 1940 1939 1970 1990 1987 2 1997 2000 1997 2002 2000 2000 2007 2000 1995 2009 2003 1995 2015 Indefinite 2006 Breakwater Major rehabilitation of locks and dams, removal of Lock and Dam 3 Major rehabilitation/embankments Major rehabilitation of electrical/mechanical systems Major rehabilitation of lock and dam Major rehabilitation of lock and dam Major rehabilitation of lock and dam Major rehabilitation of lock and dam Major rehabilitation of lock and dam Deepening Channel Lock Replacement (1200 feet) Locks and dams Enlarge turning basin, construct wideners, mitigation Construction of new lock Replacement Navigation Channels & Turning Basin Regulating works Dredging 55-foot channel Mitigation of fish and wildlife losses from construction and operation of Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation Project D-3 APPENDIX D Navigation Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 1998 Project Montgomery Point Lock and Dam, AR Mouth of Colorado River, TX (Gulf Intracoastal Waterway) Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, HI Newport, OR (Sec 107) New York Harbor and Adjacent Channels, Port Jersey Channel, NJ New York Harbor, NY and NJ Norfolk Harbor Channel, VA (1965 Mod.) Norfolk Harbor Channel, VA (1986 Mod) Norfolk Harbor, Thimble Shoal Channel, VA North Pass-Pass Manchac, LA (107) Oakland Harbor, CA Olmsted Locks and Dam, IL & KY Ouachita and Black River, AR and LA Pascagoula Harbor, MS Point Marion, Lock & Dam 8, Monongahela River, PA Port of Florence, AL Port Of Long Beach (Deepening), CA Red River WW, Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA Fiscal Year Started 1997 1984 1985 1997 1998 1976 1966 1987 1987 1995 1987 1992 1964 1994 1986 1994 1998 1974 Placed in Useful Operation 1994 1987 Incremental 1967 1989 1989 1995 1984 1995 19844 Fiscal Year Completed or Scheduled for Completion 2002 1995 1987 1998 Indefinite Indefinite Indefinite Indefinite Indefinite 1996 1999 2010 Indefinite 2000 1997 1995 2000 Indefinites Nature of Project Lock and Dam Breakwaters, dredging, and recreation Breakwater repair Breakwater Extension Deepening channel to 45 ft. providing a turning basin and bulkheading portions of the turning basin. Removal of drift sources Deferred anchorage const. Dredge 50 ft. channel and deepen to 55 feet Dredge outbound element and deepen to 55 feet 9ft.x 130ft. barge channel Channel deepening and widening turning basin Navigation Replacement of six locks and dams, channel deepening to 9 feet and realignment Channel dredging and construction of a new turning basin Replaces existing 56x360' lock chamber with new 84'x720' chamber Channel Dredging Channel Deepening Lock and dam construction. Channel improvement and realignment D-4 APPENDIX D Navigation Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 1998 Project Richmond Harbor, CA Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam, Ohio River Rochester Harbor, NY (Sec 107) Rudee Inlet, VA Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, CA Salem River, NJ San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) San Juan Harbor, PR Santa Monica Breakwater, CA Sonoma Baylands Wetlands Demonstration Project, CA Savannah Harbor Deepening, GA Savannah Harbor Widening, GA Shinnecock Inlet, NY Silver Bay Harbor, MN Sitka Harbor, AK St. George Channel Extension, AK Tampa Harbor, FL (Main Channel) Tenn River, Port of Florence Thimble Shoal Channel, VA Wallisville Lake, TX Winfield Locks and Dam, Kanawha River, WV Fiscal Year Started 1985 1985 1996 1990 1986 1995 1971 1998 1998 1993 1993 1990 1990 1994 1993 1994 1976 1994 1987 1967 1990 Placed in Useful Operation 1992 Fiscal Year Completed or Scheduled for Completion 2000 2003 1997 1997 1991 1991 Being Determined 1996 1996 Being Determined 2002 2002 1997 1989 1997 1994 1992 1995 1999 1997 1996 1987 1995 Indefinite 1999 2002 Nature of Project Channel deepening and turning basin Replacement of existing locks and major rehabilitation of the dam Wave Surge Protection Dredge 7 foot channel Deep draft channel, widening and deepening Channel deepening Deep draft channel, widening, deepening and dredging Deepening & widening for channel Repair Breakwater Restoration of Tidal Wetlands on a 348 acre site Channel deepening Widening channel Dredging and repair of jetties Harbor of Refuge Navigation Channel Dredging Dredging Channel Improvements Dredge 50 ft outbound element and dredge to 55 feet Multipurpose lake (navigation, salinity control, water supply, fish & wildlife, & recreational) Construction of new lock D-5 APPENDIX D Navigation Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 1998 Walter Jones, Joseph P. Knapp, Core Creek, and Gene A. Potter Memorial Bridge are complete. Fairfield bridge is under construction. 2 Phase I, forty-five foot channel to New Orleans, LA. Forty-five foot channel to Mile 181 (Donaldsonville, LA) placed in useful operation in 1988. Phase II, forty-five foot channel from mile 181 to Baton Rouge placed in useful operation in 1994. 3 Awaiting further PCA's to go deeper than 45 feet. 4 Lock and Dam No. 1 placed in useful operation in 1984. Lock and Dam No. 2 in 1987. Lock and Dam No. 3 in 1992. Lock and Dam No. 4 and 5 in 1994. 5 Schedule for completion of entire project is indefinite. However, the project opened to 9-foot navigation on 31 December 1994. 6 Thin-layer monitoring program is continuing. D-6 APPENDIX E Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Operable September 30, 1998 Flood Control Total and/or Nay. Storage Feature Placed Initial Existing Ultimate Community in Capability in Useful Power in Installation Installation Project H Project River Vicinity (acre-feet)' Operation CY FY (KW) (KW) Functions Type2 (: eight Length feet) (feet) Albeni Falls, ID Allatoona Lake,GA Barkley Dam & Lake Barkley, KY & TN Beaver Lake, AR Big Bend Dam (Lake Sharpel), SD Blakely Mountain Dam-Lake Ouachita Bonneville L&D Lake Bonneville, OR & WA Broken Bow Lake, OK Buford Dam, Lanier, GA Bull Shoals Lake AR & MO Clarence Cannon Dam Carters Dam, GA Center Hill Lake, TN Cleatham L&D, TN Chief Joseph Dam, (Rufus Woods Lake), WA Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC Cordell Hull L&D, TN Cougar Lake, OR Pend Oreille Etowah Cumberland White Missouri Ouachita Columbia Mountain Fork Chattahoochee White Salt Coosawatte Caney Fork Cumberland Columbia Santee Cumberland S.Fork McKenzie Newport,WA Cartersville,GA Frand Rivers, KY Eureka Springs, Chamberlain,S D Mt. Pine, AR Bonneville,OR Broken Bow, OK Buford, GA Mountain Home Perry, MO Carters, GA Lancaster,TN Ashland City, TN Bridgeport, WA St. Stephen, SC Carthage, TN Blue River, OR 1,153,000 670,000 2,082,000 1,952,000 1,883,000 2,768,000 537,000 1,368,230 2,554,000 5,408,000 1,428,000 472,756 2,092,000 104,000 593,000 2,560,000 310,900 219,000 1952 1950 1964 1963 1964 1953 1938 1968 1956 1952 1983 1975 1948 1952 1955 N/A 1973 1963 1955 1950 1966 1965 1965 1956 42,600 74,000 130,000 112,000 468,000 75,000 42,600 74,000 130,000 112,000 468,000 75,000 1938 1,145,700 1,145,700 1970 100,000 1957 86,000 NFPR FPRW NPFR C C CE FPSR CE FPRIW E FPRW NPR 100,000 FPWSR 86,000 1953 340,000 340,000 1985 1975 1951 1958 58,000 500,000 135,000 36,000 58,000 500,000 135,000 36,000 1956 2,457,384 2,457,384 1985 1974 1964 84,000 100,000 25,000 84,000 100,000 64,600 E C E NFPW E FPR C FNPRSW CE FPRW ER FPR CE NPR C PIR C NPW CE NPR CE NFPRI ER 90 190 157 228 95 235 122 225 192 258 138 450 250 75 1,055 1,250 9,959 2,575 10,570 1,100 2,690 2,750 5,400 2,256 1,700 1,950 2,160 801 230 5,998 86 876 93 1,306 445 1,738 E-1 3 5 APPENDIX E Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Operable September 30, 1998 Project Dale Hollow Lake, TN & KY Dardanelle L&D, AR DeGray Lake, AR Denison Dam (Lake Texoma), TX & OK Detroit Lake, OR, including Big Cliff Lake, OR Dworshak Dam & Reservoir, ID Eufaula Lake, OK Fort Gibson Lake, OK Fort Peck Lake, MT Fort Randal Dam Lake Francis (Case), SD Garrison Dam ( Lake Sakakawea), ND Gavins Point Dam (Lewis & Clark Lake), SD & NE Green Peter Lake,OR, including Foster Lake, OR Greers Ferry Lake, AR Harry S. Truman Dam & Res. River Obey Arkansas Caddo Red North Santiam N. Fork, Clearwater Canadian Grand (Neosho) Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Middle Santiam Little Red Osage Community in Vicinity Celina, TN Dardanelle, AR Arkadelphia, AR Denison, TX Mill City, OR Orofino, ID Eufaula, OK Ft. Gibson, OK Glasglow, MT Lake Andes, SD Riverdale, ND Yankton, SD Sweet Home, OR Heber Spings Warsaw, MO Total Storage Capability (acre-feet)' 1,706,000 486,200 831,900 5,194,163 461,000 3,468,000 3,825,400 1,284,400 18,909,000 5,574,000 24,137,000 504,000 491,000 2,844,000 5,202,000 Flood Control and/or Nay. Feature Placed in Useful Operation CY 1943 1969 1969 1944 1953 1972 1964 1949 1938 1953 1954 1956 1967 1962 19793 Initial Power in FY 1949 Existing Installation (KW} 54,000 Ultimate Installation (I(Wl 54,000 1965 124,000 124,000 1972 68,000 108,000 1945 70,000 1954 118,000 1973 1964 1953 1944 1954 1956 1957 1967 1964 1982 199,000 118,000 400,000 1,060,000 7 90,000 45,000 185,250 320,000 430,000 100,000 90,000 67,500 Project Functions FPR NPR FNPRS FPRSN Height Length Type2 (feet) (feet) C 200 1,717 C 68 2,683 E 243 3,400 E 165 17,200 NFPRI C 382 PNFR CG 717 FNPS FP E E 185,250 NFPRIW E 320,000 NFPRIW E 114 110 251 165 430,000 NFPRIW E 210 100,000 NFPRIW E 74 8,700 100,000 100,000 96,000 160,000 PFNIR C 340 96,000 FPRS C 160,000 FPRWS CE 243 96 E-2 1,528 3,287 3,200 2,990 21,026 10,700 11,300 1,380 1,704 5,000 1 1 \ 1 "1 > " APPENDIX E Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Operable September 30, 1998 Flood Control Total and/or Nay. Storage Feature Placed Initial Existing Ultimate Community in Capability in Useful Power in Installation Installation Project H Project River Vicinity (acre-feet)' Operation CY FY (KW) (KW) Functions Type2 (1 Hartwell Dam & Lake, Savannah Hartwell, GA 2,842,700 1961 1962 344,000 344,000 FPRSW CE eight Length feet) (feet) 204 17,880 GA & SC Hills Creek Lake, OR Ice Harbor L&D (Lake Sacajawea), WA J. Percy Priest Dam & Reservoir, TN J. Strom Thurmond Dam & Lake GA & SC Jim Woodruff Dam (Lake Seminole), FL, GA & AL John Day L&D (Lake Umatilla), OR & WA John H. Kerr Dam & Reservoir, NC& VA Keystone Lake, OK Lake Greeson, AR Laurel River, KY Libby Dam, Lake Koocanusa, MT Little Goose L&D (Lake Bryan), WA Lookout Point Lake including Dexter Lake, OR Lost Creek Lake, OR Lower Granite L&D, WA Middle Fork Wilamette Snake Stones Savannah Appalachicola Columbia Roanoke Arkansas Little Missouri Laurel Kootenai Snake Middle Fork Rogue Snake Oakridge, OR Pasco, WA Nashville, TN Augusta, GA Chattahoochee, FL Rufus, OR Boydton, VA Tulsa, OK Murfreesboro, AR London, KY Libby, MT Starbuck, WA Lowell, OR Trail, OR Pomeroy, WA 356,000 417,000 652,000 2,900,000 367,300 2,500,000 2,750,300 1,672,613 407,900 435,600 5,809,000 565,200 483,000 465,000 483,800 1961 1961 1967 1952 1957 1968 1952 1964 1950 1973 1972 1970 1954 1977 1975 1962 1961 1970 1953 1957 1969 1953 1968 1950 1978 1975 1970 1955 1977 1975 30,000 603,000 28,000 282,000 30,000 2,160,000 204,000 70,000 25,500 61,000 525,000 810,000 135,000 49,000 30,000 603,000 28,000 282,000 30,000 2,700,000 204,000 70,000 25,500 61,000 840,000 810,000 135,000 NFPRI NPRI FPRW FPRSW GE CG CE CE 304 130 147 200 NPRW CE 67 6,150 NPRFI FPRW FNPWS FPRW FPRW FPR NPRI NFPRI CE CE E C R C CG CE 161 144 121 183.5 282 420 165 243 49,000 DFPISWR CE 345 810,000 810,000 NPRIF CG 146 E-3 2,150 2,822 2,716 5,680 5,900 22,285 4,600 941 1,420 3,055 2,655 3,381 3,600 3,200 APPENDIX E Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Operable September 30, 1998 Flood Control Total and/or Nay. Storage Feature Placed Initial Existing Ultimate Community in Capability in Useful Power in Installation Installation Project H Project River Vicinity (acre-feet)' Operation CY FY (KW) (KW) Functions Type 2 ( Lower Monumental Snake Kahlotus, WA 376,000 1969 1969 810,000 810,000 NPRI CG L&D (Lake Herbert G. West), WA McNary L&D OR & WA Millers Ferry L&D, AL Mississippi Delta Region, LA (Caernarvon Freshwater Diversion) Nanpil River Hydropower, Pohnpei, FSM New Melones Lake, CA4 Norfork Lake, AR & MO Oahe Dam (Lake Oahe), SD & ND Old Hickory L&D, TN Ozark-Jeta Taylor L&D, AR Philpott Lake, VA Richard B. Russell Dam & Lake, GA & SC Robert F. Henry L&D, AL Robert S. Kerr L&D and Reservoir, OK Columbia Alabama Mississippi Nanpil River Stanislaus North Fork Missouri Cumberland Arkansas Roanoke Savannah Alabama Arkansas Umatilla, OR Camden, AL Braithwaite, LA Pohnpei, FSM Oakdale, CA Norfolk, AR Pierre, SD Hendersonville, TN Ozark, AR Bassett, VA Augusta, GA Benton, AL Sallisaw, OK 1,350,000 331,8090 2,400,000 1,983,000 23,337,000 545,000 148,400 318,500 1,026,244 234,200 525,700 1953 1969 1991 1987 1978 1943 1959 1954 1969 1951 1984 1972 1970 1954 1979 1988 980,000 75,000 2,000 980,000 75,000 2,000 1979 300,000 300,000 1944 1962 1957 1973 1954 1984 1975 1971 80,550 595,000 100,000 100,000 14,000 328,000 68,000 110,000 163,000 595,000 100,000 100,000 14,000 648,000 68,000 110,000 NPRI NPRW W P CG CE CE eight Length feet) (feet) 135 3,791 183 90 38.5 C 17 FIPRW ER 625 FPRS NFPRIW NPR NPR FPR PRFSW NPRW NPR C E CE C C CE CE E 216 245 98 58 220 200 101 75 7,365 11,380 371 70 1,560 2,624 9,300 3,605 2,480 892 5,616 14,962 7,230 E-4 APPENDIX E Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Operable September 30, 1998 Flood Control Total and/or Nay. Storage Feature Placed Initial Existing Ultimate Community in Capability in Useful Power in Installation Installation Project H Project River Vicinity (acre-feet)' Operation CY FY (KW) (KW) Functions Type2 ( Sam Rayburn Dam& Angelina Jasper, TX 3,997,600 1965 1966 52,000 52,000 FPWR CE Reservoir, TX St. Mary's Riv, MI Snettisham, AK 5 Stockton Lake, MO Table Rock Lake, AR & MO Tenkiller Lake, OK The Dalles L&D (Lake Celilo), WA & OR Walter F. George L&D, GA & FL Webbers Falls L&D, OK West Point Lake, AL & GA Whitney Lake, TX Wolf Creek Dam (Lake Cumberland), KY Great Lakes Sault Ste. Marie Illinois Columbia Chattahooche Arkansas Chattahooche Brazos Cumberland Juneau, AK Stockton, MO Branson, MO Gore, OK The Dalles, OR Fort Gaines, GA Wevbbers Falls, OK West Point, GA Whitney, TX Jamestown, KY 352,400 1,674,000 3,462,000 1,230,800 53,000 934,000 170,100 604,500 1,999,500 6,089,000 1855 1969 1958 1952 1957 1963 1970 1975 1953 1950 1952 1973 1973 1959 18,400 73,700 45,200 200,000 18,400 73,700 45,200 200,000 1953 39,100 39,100 1957 1,806,800 1,806,800 1963 1973 1975 130,000 130,000 60,000 73,375 60,000 108,375 1954 30,000 30,000 1952 270,000 270,000 NP P FPRWSQ FPR FP NPR C 6 CEG CE E CR eight Length feet) (feet) 120 19,430 Control Gate 18 128 252 197 300 NPRW CE 114 338 5,100 6,423 3,000 8,875 13,585 NP E 84 4,370 FPRW CE 97 7,250 FPR FPR CE 159 CE 258 17,695 5,736 E-5 Speel Sac White APPENDIX E Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Operable September 30, 1998 NOMENCLATURE FOR PROJECT FUNCTIONS D - Debris Control P - Power F - Flood Control R - Public Recreation Annual Attendance exceeding 5,00 I - Irrigation S - Water Supply N - Navigation W - Fish & Wildlife (Federal Or State) Total of all storage functions, including inactive and dead storage to normal full pool 2 G: gravel; R: rock; C: concrete; E: earth 3 All six units have successfully generated power; however, repairs and modifications have been required on all units. Units 2, 3, 4, 5 and fully repaired and operational. Repairs to remaining unit No. 1 will be completed in FY 99. 4 Being operated for the Department of Interior by the Bureau of Reclamation 5 Being operated by the Alaska Power Administration 6 Formerly Clarks Hill Lake ' Units 5 and 6 were deauthorized in 1990. '0 6 E-6 APPENDIX F Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Under Construction September 30, 1998 Nameplate Capacity Project Fiscal Scheduled Scheduled Scheduled Ultimate Installation Year For For Functions Installation Started Operation Completion Bonneville Second Powerhouse, OR and WA 1974 1981 1998 PR 558,200 558,200 Chief Joseph Additional Units, WA 1973 1994 1999 PIR 2,2373,160 2,525,000 Cooper River, Charleston Hbr, SC 1977 1985 1999 NWDP 84,000 84,000 Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage 1965 1982 2 1996 FRPWS 160,000 River, MO Mississippi Delta Region, LA (Davis Pond 1996 2000 2003 2003 W Freshwater Diversion) New Melones Lake, CA 3 1966 1979 Indefinite DFIPRW 300,000 300,000 Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, Savannah 1975 1985 1999 FRPW 648,000 600,000 River, GA and SC Snettisham, AK 1967 1989 1993 P 73,700 27,000 KEY - Redevelopment - Power F R - Flood Control - Recreation I S - Irrigation - Water Supply N W - Navigation - Fish & Wildlife F-1 D P APPENDIX F Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Under Construction September 30, 1998 Limited by hydraulic factors. Units 1-27. 2 All six units have successfully generated power; however, repairs and modifications have been required on all units. Units 3, 4, 5, and 6 are fully repaired and operational. Repairs to remaining units will be completed in FY 98. 3 New Melones Lake was turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation for operation on November 20, 1979. Corps retains responsibility for facilities along the lower Stanisalaus River. Remaining construction consists of unscheduled recreation facilities and minor feature closeouts. F-2 A Aberdeen and Vicinity, SD (NWO) 26-3, 26-17, 26-24 Abiquiu Dam, NM (SPA) 36-5, 36-14 Acequias Irrigation System, NM (SPA) 36-1, 36-13, 36-16 Active Investigations (SAQ) 7-8, 7-21 Addicks and Barker Reservoirs, TX (SWG) 40-12 Addison, NY (NAB) 4-16, 4-31 Advance Engineering and Design Alaska District (POA) 32-8 Albuquerque District (SPA) 36-12 Baltimore District (NAB) 4-25 Buffalo District (LRB) 20-15 Detroit District (LRE) 21-37 Fort Worth District (SWF) 39-15 Galveston District (SWG) 40-18 Honolulu District (POH) 31-4 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-37 Little Rock District (SWL) 36-14 Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-11 Louisville District (LRL) 24-15, 24-39 Mobile District (SAM) 10-26 Nashville District (LRN) 23-8 New England Division (NAE) 1-22 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-19 Pittsburgh District (LRP) 18-13 Portland District (NWP) 28-24 Rock Island District (MVR) 15-8 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-30 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-12 Seattle District (NWS) 29-14 St. Paul 16-12 Walla Walla District (NWW) 30-12 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-21 Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL & GA (SAM) 10-3, 10-28, 10-48 Alamo Dam, AZ (SPL) 33-6, 33-14, 33-22 Alamogordo, NM (SPA) 36-2, 36-13 Alamosa, CO (SPA) 36-2, 36-13, 36-16 Albeni Falls Dam, ID (NWS) 29-11, 29-20, 29-25 Albuquerque Diversion Channels, NM (SPA) 36-2, 36-14 Alenaio Stream, Hawaii, HI (POH) 31-2, 31-5, 31-6 Allatoona Dam - Coosa River Basin, GA (SAM) 10-22, 10-32, 10-48 Allegheny River, PA (LRP) 18-2, 18-15, 18-19, 18-27 Allendale Dam, North ProvideLRE, RI (NAE) 1-10, 1-26, 1-35 Almond Lake, NY (NAB) 4-16, 4-31 Aloha Rigolette, LA (MVK) 12-4, 12-10, 12-12 Alpena Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-2, 21-55, 21-78 Alton to Gale Organized Levee Districts, IL & MO (MVS) 14-3, 14-8, 14-11 Alum Creek Lake, OH (LRH) 25-2, 25-12, 25-17 Alvin R. Bush Dam, PA (NAB) 4-21, 4-32 American River Watershed, CA (SPK) 35-5, 35-33, 35-43, 35-48 Anacortes Harbor, WA (NWS) 29-2, 29-16, 29-22 Anacostia River and Tributaries, MD & DC (NAB) 4-23, 4-33, 4-40, 4-44 Anahuac Channel, TX (SWG) 40-10 Anchorage Harbor, AK (POA) 32-2, 32-9, 32-13 Andrews River (NAE) 1-3, 1-23, 1-32 Apalachicola Bay, FL (SAM) 10-4, 10-28, 10-34 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, AL, FL & GA (SAM) 10-4, 10-28, 10-49 Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR (NWP) 28-10, 28-27, 28-35 Appomattox River, VA (NAO) 5-2, 5-12, 5-16, 5-14, 5-19 Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Buffalo District (LRB) 20-15 Omaha District (NWO) 26-12 Pittsburgh, District (LRP) 18-14 Aquatic Plant Control Charleston District (SAC) 7-1, 7-9, 7-12 Galveston District (SWG) 40-2, 40-20, 40-25 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-3, 9-40, 9-52, 9-78, 9-84 Mobile District (SAM) 10-6, 10-28, 10-34 New York District (NAN) 2-3, 2-24, 2-27 Savannah District (SAS) 8-2, 8-12, 8-14 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-2, 6-22 Aquilla Lake, TX (SWF) 39-3, 39-15, 39-19 Arcadia Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-3, 21-55, 21-78 Arcadia Lake, OK (SWT) 38-2, 38-15, 38-24 Area V, Estelline Springs, TX (SWT) 38-3, 38-15, 38-24 Area VIII, TX (SWT) 38-3, 38-15, 38-24 Arecibo Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-3, 9-40, 9-52 Arkansas City, KS (SWT) 38-3, 38-15, 38-24 Arkansas-Red River Basins Chloride Control Projects, KS, OK and TX (SWT) 38-3, 38-15, 38-24 I-1 Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK and KS (SWL) 37-2, 37-21, 37-26, 37-28, 37-29 Arkansas River, Little Rock Port, AR (SWL) 37-16 Arkport Dam, NY (NAB) 4-17, 4-31 Arroyo Colorado, TX (SWG) 40-15 Arthur V. Ormond Lock and Dam (No. 9), AR (SWL) 37-3, 37-26 Ashland Harbor, WI (LRE) 21-3, 21-55, 21-78 Ashtabula Harbor, OH (LRB) 20-2, 20-16, 20-22 Atlantic Beach Channels, NC (SAW) 6-2, 6-22 Atlantic Coast of Maryland (NAB) 4-12, 4-29, 4-38 Atlantic Coast of Long Island, Jones Inlet to East Rockaway Inlet; Long Beach Island, NY (NAN) 2-13, 2-24, 2-30 Atlantic Intracoastal Bridge at Great Bridge, VA (NAO) 5-3, 5-12, 5-16 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL (NAO) 5-2, 5-12, 5-16, (SAW) 6-2, 6-22, 6-28, (SAC) 7-2, 7-9, 7-12 (SAS) 8-2, 8-12, 8-14 (SAJ) 9-3, 9-40, 9-52 Aunt Lydia's Cove, Chatham, MA (NAE) 1-3, 1-23, 1-32 AuSable Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-4, 21-55, 21-78 Authorized Alteration of Bridges (LRN) 23-4 Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects (LRE) 21-41 Avoca, NY (NAB) 4-17, 4-31 Avon Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-4, 6-22, 6-35 Aylesworth Creek Lake, PA (NAB) 4-13, 4-30 B B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, NC (SAW) 6-12, 6-25 Back' River, Poquoson, VA (NAO) 5-3, 5-12 Bakers Haulover Inlet, FL (SAJ) 9-4, 9-40, 9-52 Ball Mountain Lake, VT (NAE) 1-11, 1-26 Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD and VA (NAB) 4-3, 4-27, 4-34, 4-36 Baltimore Harbor, MD Collection and Removal of Drift (NAB) 4-4, 4-27, 4-35 Bardwell Lake, TX (SWF) 39-3, 39-15, 39-19 Barnegat Inlet, NJ (NAP) 3-2, 3-20, 3-26 Barre Falls Dam, MA (NAE) 1-12, 1-26 Barren River Lake, KY (LRL) 24-7, 24-17, 24-33 Bassett Creek, MN (MVP) 16-4, 16-13, 16-17 Bayou Coden, AL (SAM) 10-6, 10-28, 10-34 Bayou La Batre, AL (SAM) 10-7, 10-28, 10-34 Bayview Court, Bay St. Louis, MS (SAM) 10-17, 10-31, 10-41 Beach Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization Baltimore District (NAB) 4-12 Chicago District (LRC) 22-10 Detroit District (LRE) 21-42 Honolulu District (POH) 31-2 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-31 New York District (NAN) 2-17 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-8 Savannah District (SAS) 8-6 Beals Creek, Big Spring, TX (SWF) 39-3, 39-15, 39-19 Bear Creek Lake, CO (NWO) 26-4, 26-17, 26-24 Beaufort Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-4, 6-22, 6-29, 6-35 Beaver Lake, AR (SWL) 37-10, 37-19, 37-30 Beech Fork Lake, WV (LRH) 25-3, 25-12, 25-17 Belhaven Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-5, 6-22 Belton Lake, TX (SWF) 39-4, 39-15, 39-19 Beltzville Lake, PA (NAP) 3-12, 3-21, 3-29 Benbrook Lake, TX (SWF) 39-4, 39-15, 39-19 Bennett's Creek, VA (NAO) 5-3, 5-12, 5-22 Berlin Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (LRP) 18-7, 18-15, 18-21 Bethel Bank Stabilization, AK (POA) 32-6, 32-11, 32-15 Bethel Small boat Harbor, AK (POA) 32-2, 32-9, 32-13, 32-16 Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, Missouri River Basin, SD (NWO) 26-13, 26-22, 26-27 Big Fork River, MN (MVP) 16-4, 16-13, 16-17 Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, KY and TN (LRN) 23-49 Biloxi Harbor, MS (SAM) 10-7, 10-28, 10-34 Binghamton, NY (NAB) 4-17, 4-31 Birch Hill Dam, MA (NAE) 1-17, 1-26 Birch Lake, OK (SWT) 38-4, 38-16, 38-24 Black River (Port Huron), MI (LRE) 21-4, 21-55, 21-78 Black River Harbor (U.P.) MI, (LRE) 21-5, 21-56, 21-79, 21-96 Black River Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-3, 21-40, 21-62 Black River Poplar Bluff, MO (SWL) 37-5, 37-17, 37-24 Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY (LRB) 20-2, 20-16, 20-22 Black Rock Lake, CT (NAE) 1-14, 1-28 I-2 Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, AL (SAM) 10-8, 10-29, 10-35, 10-50 Black Warrior River, Northport Levee, AL (SAM) 10-17, 10-31, 10-41 Blackstone River Basin, MA and RI (NAE) 1-10, 1-48 Blackwater Dam, NH (NAE) 1-16, 1-29 Blue Marsh Lake, PA (NAP) 3-14, 3-24, 3-32 Blue Mountain Lake, AR (SWL) 37-5, 37-17, 37-29 Blue River Basin, Kansas City, MO (NWK) 27-2, 27-11, 27-15 Blue River Channel, Kansas City, MO (NWK) 27-3, 27-11, 27-16 Blue River Lake, OR (NWP) 28-11, 28-27, 28-35 Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (LRH) 25-3, 25-12, 25-17 Bon Secour River, AL (SAM) 10-9, 10-29, 10-36 Bonneville Lock and Dam - Lake Bonneville, OR and WA (NWP) 28-15, 28-29, 28-36 Bonneville Navigation Lock, Bonneville Dam, OR and WA (NWP) 28-2, 28-25, 28-32, 28-46 Boston Harbor, MA (NAE) 1-3, 1-23, 1-26, 1-44 Bowie County Levee, TX (SWT) 38-4, 38-16, 38-24 Bowman-Haley Lake, ND (NWO) 26-4, 26-17, 26-24 Boyer Chute, NE (NWO) 26-10, 26-21, 26-27 Brays Bayou, TX (SWG) 40-13 Brazos Island Harbor, (SWG) 40-2, 40-20, 40-25, 40-45, 40-46, 40-52 Brevard County, FL (SAJ) 9-22, 9-47, 9-70 Broad Top Region, PA (NAB) 4-12, 4-29, 4-38 Brockway, PA (Allegheny River Basin) (LRP) 18-25 Broken Bow Lake, OK (SWT) 38-12, 38-21, 38-26 Brookville Lake, KY (LRL) 24-7, 24-17, 24-33 Broward County, FL Beach Erosion Control and Hillsboro Inlet, FL Navigation Project (SAJ) 9-23, 9-47, 9-71 Brunswick Harbor, GA (SAS) 8-3, 8-12, 8-16 Brush Creek, Kansas City, MO (NWK) 27-3, 27-11, 27-16 Buchanan Dam-H.V. Eastman Lake, Chowchilla River, CA (SPK) 35-5, 35-34 Buckhorn Lake, KY (LRL) 24-7, 24-17, 24-33 Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX (SWG) 40-12, 40-22, 40-39 Buffalo Bayou at Lynchburg, TX (SWG) 40-14, 40-22 Buffalo Harbor, NY (LRB) 20-3, 20-16, 20-21 Buffalo Harbor Environmental Dredging (LRB) 20-3, 20-16, 20-24 Buffumville Lake, MA (NAE) 1-19, 1-30 Buford Dam, Lake Sidney Lanier, GA (SAM) 10-23, 10-32, 10-43, 10-49 Buford Trenton Irrigation District, ND (NWO) 26-4, 26-17, 26-24 Bull Shoals Lake, AR (SWL) 37-11, 37-19, 30-30 Burns Waterway Harbor, IN (LRC) 22-3, 22-15, 22-19, 22-24 Burns Waterway SBH, IN (LRC) 22-3, 22-15, 22-19, 22-24 Burns Waterway Harbor (Maj. Rehab), IN (LRC) 22-4, 22-15 Burnsville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (LRH) 25-3, 25-12, 25-17 Bypass Levees, CA (SPK) 35-44 C Cache Creek Basin, (Cache Creek Settling Basin), CA (SPK) 35-6, 35-34, 35-48 Caesar Creek Lake, OH (LRL) 24-7, 24-17, 24-33 Cagles Mill Lake, IN (LRL) 24-7, 24-17, 24-33 Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek and Tributaries, including New Hogan Lake and Farmington Dam, CA (SPK) 35-7, 35-34 California Bend, NE (NWO) 26-11, 26-21, 26-27 Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN (LRC) 22-4, 22-15, 22-19, 22-24, 22-27 Canaveral Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-4, 9-40, 9-53, 9-82 Candy Lake, OK (SWT) 38-4, 38-16, 38-24 Canisteo, NY (NAB) 4-17, 4-31 Canton Lake, OK (SWT) 38-5, 38-16, 38-24 Canyon Lake, TX (SWF) 39-4, 39-15, 39-19 Cape Cod Canal, MA (NAE) 1-4, 1-23, 1-33 Cape Fear River, Above Wilmington, NC (SAW) 6-5, 6-22 Cape Fear River Basin, NC (SAW) 6-12 Cape Girardeau-Jackson, MO (MVS) 14-4, 14-8, 14-11 Cape May Inlet to Lower Twp., NJ (NAP) 3-12, 3-23, 3-32 Carolina Beach and Vicinity, NC (SAW) 6-12, 6-25 Carpenters Bayou, TX (SWG) 40-14 Carr Creek Lake, KY (LRL) 24-8, 24-18 Carrabelle Harbor, FL (SAM) 10-10, 10-29, 10-36 Carters Dam and Reservoir, GA (SAM) 10-23, 10-32 Casino Beach, IL (LRC) 22-8, 22-17, 22-22 1-3 Catastrophic Disaster Preparedness Program (MVN) 11-9 (MVK) 12-9 (MVM) 13-2 (MVS) 14-1 (MVR) 15-8 Cato Springs Branch and Town Branch, Fayetteville, AR (SWL) 37-6, 37-17, 37-24 Cattaraugus Harbor, NY (LRB) 20-3, 20-16, 20-24 Cave Run Lake, KY (LRL) 24-8, 24-18 Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN (LRL) 24-9, 24-18, 24-33 Cedar Creek, DE (NAP) 3-3, 3-20, 3-26 Cedar River Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-5, 21-56, 21-79 Cedar River, Renton, WA (NWS) 29-9, 29-19, 29-25 Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN (LRN) 23-6, 23-9, 23-17 Central and Southern Florida (SAJ) 9-31, 9-49, 9-74, 9-85, 9-86, 9-87, 9-88 Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass, FL (SAJ) 9-5, 9-48, 9-53 Channel from Pamlico Sound to Rodanthe, NC (SAW) 6-5, 6-23 Channel Islands Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-2, 33-13, 33-17, 33-32 Channel to Liberty, TX (SWG) 40-10 Channel to Newport News, VA (NAO) 5-3, 5-12, 5-16, 5-19 Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), MA (NAE) 1-10, 1-26 Charleston Harbor Rediversion (Fish Lift), SC (SAC) 7-3, 7-9, 7-14 Charleston Harbor, SC (SAC) 7-2, 7-9, 7-13, 7-20 Charlevoix Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-5, 21-56, 21-79 Charlotte Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-5, 9-41, 9-53 Chartiers Creek, PA (LRP) 18-4, 18-15 Chaska, MN (MVP) 16-5, 16-13, 16-17 Chatfield Lake, CO (NWO) 26-4, 26-18, 26-24 Chatham (Stage) Harbor, MA (NAE) 1-4, 1-23, 1-33 Cheyboygan Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-6, 21-56, 21-79 Chehalis River at South Aberdeen and Cosmopolis, WA (NWS) 29-9, 29-19, 29-25 Chena River Lakes, AK (POA) 32-6, 32-12, 32-15 Cherry Creek Lake, CO (NWO) 26-5, 26-18, 26-25 Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, St. Georges Bridge Replacement, DE, (NAP) 3-2, 3-20, 3-26 Chesapeake Bay Oyster Recovery, MD (NAB) 4-24, 4-33, 4-41 Chester River, MD (NAB) 4-4, 4-27, 4-35 Chetco River, OR (NWP) 28-2, 28-25, 28-32 Chicago Harbor, IL (LRC) 22-4, 22-15, 22-20, 22-24 Chicago River, IL (LRC) 22-5, 22-16, 22-20, 22-24 Chicago River, IL (North Branch) (LRC) 22-10, 22-24 Chicago Shoreline, IL (LRC) 22-9, 22-17 Chief Joseph Dam - Rufus Woods Lake, WA (NWS) 29-12, 29-20, 29-25 Chignik Harbor, AK (POA) 32-2, 32-9, 32-13 Chincoteague Inlet, VA (NAO) 5-4, 5-12, 5-16 Choctawhatchee and Pea Rivers, FL and AL (SAM) 10-18, 10-31, 10-41 Claiborne Lock and Dam, AL (SAM) 10-3, 10-28 Clarence J. Brown Dam and Reservoir, OH (LRL) 24-9, 24-18 Clear Creek (SWG) 40-14, 40-22, 40-39 Clearwater Lake, MO (SWL) 37-6, 37-17, 37-30 Cleveland Harbor, OH (LRB) 20-4, 20-16, 20-25 Clifton, San Francisco River, AZ (SPL) 33-6, 33-14, 33-22 Clinton Lake, Wakarusa River, KS (NWK) 27-3, 27-12, 27-16 Clinton River, MI (LRE) 21-7, 21-57, 21-79 Clinton River Spillway, MI (LRE) 21-43, 21-75, 21-91 Clinton Wastewater Treatment & Plant, Clinton, NC (SAW) 6-13, 6-25 Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection, and Restoration Act (MVN) 11-8 Cocheco River, NH (NAE) 1-4, 1-26, 1-38 Cochiti Lake, NM (SPA) 36-6, 36-14 Cohassett Harbor, MA (NAE) 1-5, 1-24, 1-33 Cold Spring Inlet, NJ (NAP) 3-3, 3-20, 3-26 Colebrook River Lake, CT (NAE) 1-12, 1-27 Collection and Study of Basic Data Alaska District (POA) 32-7 Albuquerque District (SPA) 36-12 Baltimore District (NAB) 4-25 Buffalo District (LRB) 20-15 Chicago District (LRC) 22-14 Detroit District (LRE) 21-54 Fort Worth District (SWF) 39-14 Galveston District (SWG) 40-18 Honolulu District (POH) 31-3 Huntington District (LRH) 25-11 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-36 Little Rock District (SWL) 37-14 Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-11 Louisville District (LRL) 24-15, 24-40 Mobile District (SAM) 10-26 Nashville District (LRN) 23-8 I-4 New England Division (NAE) 1-22 New York District (NAN) 2-22 Norfolk District (NAO) 5-11 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-19 Pittsburgh District (LRP) 18-13 Portland District (NWP) 28-24 Rock Island District (MVR) 15-8 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-30 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-12 Savannah District (SAS) 8-11 Seattle District (NWS) 29-14 St. Paul District (MVP) 16-12 Tulsa District (SWT) 38-14, 38-31 Walla Walla District (NWW) 30-12 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-21 Colorado River at Grand Junction, CO (SPK) 35-6, 35-34 Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR (NWP) 28-2, 28-25, 28-32, 28-42 Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA (NWP) 28-3, 28-25, 28-33, 28-42 Columbia River at the Mouth, OR and WA (NWP) 28-4, 28-25, 28-33 Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Protection Projects (NWW) 30-2, 30-15 Columbia River between Chinook, WA and Head of Sand Island (NWP) 28-4, 28-25, 28-33 Columbia River between Vancouver, WA and The Dalles, OR (NWP) 28-4, 28-25, 28-33, 28-47 Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program (The Dalles, Project), OR and WA (NWP) 28-16, 28-29, 28-36 Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program (Walla Walla District) (NWW) 30-4, 30-13, 30-16 Columbia River, Seafarers Memorial, Hammond, OR (NWP) 28-5, 28-25, 28-33, 28-42 Columbia River Treaty Fishing Sites, OR and WA (NWP) 28-16, 28-29, 28-36 Comite River, LA (Diversion) (MVN) 11-4, 11-13, 11-18 Conant Brook Dam, MA (NAE) 1-12, 1-27 Conchas Lake, NM (SPA) 36-2, 36-13 Conemaugh River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (LRP) 18-7, 18-21, 18-16 Conneaut Harbor, OH (LRB) 20-5, 20-16, 20-27 Connecticut River Basin, VT, NH, MA and CT (NAE) 1-10, 1-49, 1-50 Construction of Locks and Dams, Ohio River (LRL) 24-2 Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River (LRH) 25-2 Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River (OR) 19-1, 19-4, 19-6 Construction of Locks and Dams, Ohio River (LRP) 18-2 Continuing Authorities Program (NWK) 27-9 Continuation of Planning and Engineering Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-36 Cook Inlet, AK (POA) 32-2, 32-9, 32-13 Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC (SAC) 7-3, 7-9, 7-14 Coordination with other Agencies (LRL) 24-15, 24-40 (SWG) 40-18 Coos Bay, OR (NWP) 28-5, 28-25, 28-33 Coosa River, Montgomery to Gadsden, AL (SAM) 10-4, 10-28 Copan Lake, OK (SWT) 38-5, 38-16, 38-24 Coquille River, OR (NWP) 28-6, 28-26, 28-34 Coralville Lake, IA (MVR) 15-5, 15-9, 15-13 Corning, NY (NAB) 4-18, 4-31 Cornstalk Branch, Judsonia, AR (SWL) 37-16 Cornucopia Harbor, WI (LRE) 21-7, 21-57, 21-79 Corpus Christi Beach, TX (SWG) 40-12, 40-22, 40-38 Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX (SWG) 40-2, 40-20, 40-25, 40-26, 40-27, 40-45, 40-46, 40-52 Corte Madera Creek, CA (SPK) 35-9, 35-35, 35-43, 35-48 Cottage Grove Lake, OR (NWP) 28-11, 28-28, 28-35 Cougar Lake, OR (NWP) 28-17, 28-29, 28-37 Council Grove Lake, KS (SWT) 38-5, 38-16, 38-24 Cowanesque Lake, PA (NAB) 4-20, 4-32 Coyote and Berryessa Creeks, CA (SPK) 35-8, 35-43 Crisfield Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-5, 4-27, 4-35 Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (LRP) 18-8, 18-16, 18-21 Cross Florida Barge Canal, (SAJ) 9-6, 9-41, 9-54, 9-82 Cumberland, MD and Ridgeley, WV (NAB) 4-12, 4-29, 4-38 Cumberland River, TN and KY (LRN) 23-2, 23-9, 23-11, 23-15 Curwensville Lake, PA (NAB) 4-22, 4-33 Cypress Creek, TX (SWG) 40-15, 40-22, 40-39 I-5 D Dade County, FL (SAJ) 9-32, 9-49 Dade County, North of Haulover Beach, FL (SAJ) 9-33, 9-49 DaleHollow Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN and KY (LRN) 23-7, 23-9, 23-17 Danville (Southside Wastewater Treatment Plant), VA (SAW) 6-13, 6-25 Dardanelle Lock and Dam (No. 10), AR (SWL) 37-12, 37-19, 37-26 Dauphin Island, AL (SAM) 10-10, 10-29, 10-36 David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No. 6), AR (SWL) 37-3, 37-26 Deauthorization Projects Buffalo District (LRB) 20-15, 20-44, 20-45 New York District (NAN) 2-22, Mobile District (SAM) 10-17, 10-46 Deer Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (LRH) 25-3, 25-12, 25-17 Delaware Coast Protection, DE (NAP) 3-12, 3-23, 3-32 Delaware Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (LRH) 25-4, 25-13, 25-17 Delaware River between Philadelphia, PA and Trenton, NJ (NAP) 3-3, 3-20, 3-26 Delaware River, PA, NJ and DE Philadelphia to the Sea (NAP) 3-4, 3-21, 3-27 Delaware River Vicinity of Camden, NJ (NAP) 3-4, 3-21, 3-27 Depoe Bay, OR (NWP) 28-6, 28-26, 28-34, 28-42 DeQueen Lake, AR (SWL) 37-6, 37-17, 37-30 Deroin Bend, MO (NWO) 26-11, 26-21, 26-26 Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, IA (MVR) 15-5, 15-9, 15-13 Detroit Lake - Big Cliff, OR (NWP) 28-18, 28-29, 28-37 Detroit River, MI (LRE) 21-8, 21-57, 21-80, 21-96, 21-99 Dewey Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY (LRH) 25-4, 25-13, 25-17 Dierks Lake, AR (SWL) 37-7, 37-18, 37-30 Dillingham Emergency Bank Stabilization, AK (POA) 32-6, 32-12, 32-15 Dillingham Harbor, AK (POA) 32-3, 32-9, 32-13 Dillon Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (LRH) 25-4, 25-13, 25-17 Dog and Fowl Rivers, AL (SAM) 10-11, 10-29, 10-37 Dorena Lake, OR (NWP) 28-11, 28-28, 28-36 Double Bayou, TX (SWG) 40-3, 40-20, 40-28, 40-46 Douglas Harbor, AK (POA) 32-3, 32-10, 32-13, 32-16 Drum Inlet, NC (SAW) 6-5, 6-23 Dry Jordan Creek, Harrison, AR (SWL) 37-7, 37-18 Duck Creek, OH (LRL) 24-3, 24-16, 24-23 Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN and WI (LRE) 21-8, 21-57, 21-80, 21-96 Dunkirk Harbor, NY (LRB) 20-5, 20-16, 20-28 Duval County, FL (SAJ) 9-24, 9-47, 9-71 Dworshak Units 5 and 6, ID (NWW) 30-5, 30-13, 30-17, 30-21, 30-23 E East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Ohio River Basin, (LRP) 18-8, 18-16, 18-21 East Brimfield Lake, MA (NAE) 1-22, 1-30 East Lynn Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (LRH) 25-5, 25-13, 25-18 East Pass Channel from Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, FL (SAM) 10-11, 10-29, 10-37 East Rockaway Inlet, NY (NAN) 2-13, 2-25, 2-30 East Sidney, NY (NAB) 4-18, 4-31 East St. Louis and Vicinity, IL (MVS) 14-4, 14-8, 14-12 Eau Gallie Harbor, FL (SMA) 9-6, 9-41, 9-54 Ecosystem Restoration Work Under Special Authorization (MVM) 13-2, (MVS) 14-6, (MVK) 12-9, (SAC) 7-8, (MVR) 15-8 Ediz Hook, WA (NWS) 29-2, 29-16, 29-22 Edward MacDowell Lake, NH (NAE) 1-16, 1-29 El Dorado Lake, KS (SWT) 38-5, 38-16, 38-24 El Paso, TX (SPA) 36-3, 36-13, 36-16 Elk City Lake, KS (SWT) 38-6, 38-17, 38-24, 38-28 Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR (NWP) 28-12, 28-28, 28-36 Elkins, WV (LRP) 18-4, 18-15, 18-20 Elmira, NY (NAB) 4-18, 4-31 Emergency Bank Protection (NAP) 3-14 Emergency Flood Control Activities Norfolk District (NAO) 5-11, Tulsa District (SWF) 38-12 Emergency Response Activities (NWK) 27-9, Portland District (NWP) 28-23, Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-11, (SAC) 7-8 Emergency Shore Protection (LRE) 21-41 I-6 Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection Under Special Authorization Galveston District (SWG) 40-17 Savannah District (SAS) 8-8 Emmett Sanders Lock and Dam (No. 4) (SWL) 37-3, 37-26 Enforcement (SAJ) 9-37 Environmental Data Studies (SPA) 36-12 Environmental Review Guide for Operations (LRB) 20-11 Erie Harbor, PA (LRB) 20-5, 20-17, 20-28 Eufaula Lake, OK (SWT) 38-12, 38-22, 38-26 Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA (NWS) 29-2, 29-16, 29-22 Everglades South Florida Ecosystem Restoration (SAJ) 9-38, 9-50, 9-77, 9-78 F Fairfield Vicinity Streams, CA (SPK) 35-10, 35-35 Fairport Harbor, OH (LRB) 20-6, 20-17, 20-29 Fall Creek Lake, OR (NWP) 28-12, 28-28, 28-36 Fall River Basin, SD (NWO) 26-5, 26-18, 26-25 Fall River Lake, KS (SWT) 38-6, 38-17, 38-24, 38-28 Falls Lake, NC (SAW) 6-15, 6-25 Far Creek, NC (SAW) 6-6, 6-23, 6-35 Faulkner Island, CT (NAE) 1-14, 1-28 Fern Ridge Lake, OR (NWP) 28-13, 28-28, 28-36 Fernandina Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-6, 9-41, 9-54 Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O'The Pines, TX (SWF) 39-5, 39-17, 39-19 Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, NY (NAN) 2-13, S2-25, 2-30 Fire Island to Jones Inlet, NY (NAN) 2-3, 2-24, 2-27, 2-34 Fishing Bay, MD (NAB) 4-5, 4-27, 4-35 Fishing Creek, MD (NAB) 4-5, 4-27, 4-35 Fishtrap Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY (LRH) 25-5, 25-13, 25-18 Fivemile River, CT (NAE) 1-5, 1-24, 1-33 Flathead River, MT (NWS) 29-9, 29-19, 29-25 Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Mobile District (SAM) 10-26 Omaha District (NWO) 26-16 Savannah District (SAS) 8-11 St. Paul District (MVP) 16-12 Flood Control Reservoir Operations (NAE) 1-24 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization Alaska District (POA) 32-7 Albuquerque District (SPA) 36-12 Baltimore District (NAB) 4-23 Buffalo District (LRB) 20-13, 20-46 Charleston District (SAC) 7-7, 7-22 Chicago District (LRC) 22-14 Detroit District (LRE) 21-34 Galveston District (SWG) 40-17 Honolulu District (POH) 31-3 Huntington District (LRH) 25-11 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-36 Little Rock District (SWL) 37-10 Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-11 Louisville District (LRL) 24-14, 24-37 Memphis District (MVM) 13-2 Mobile District (SAM) 10-17, 10-21, 10-47 Nashville District (LRN) 23-6, 23-18 New England Division (NAE) 1-21 New Orleans District (MVN) 11-9, 11-26 New York District (NAN) 2-22 Omaha District (NWO) 26-9 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-14 Pittsburgh District (LRP) 18-13, 18-32 Rock Island District (MVR) 15-7, 15-21 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-28 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-12 Savannah District (SAS) 8-7 St. Louis District (MVS) 14-6, 14-20 Tulsa District (SWT) 38-12, 38-30 Vicksburg District (MVK) 12-8 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-17, 6-37 Fly Creek, Fairhope, AL (SAM) 10-11, 10-30, 10-37 Folly River, SC (SAC) 7-4, 7-9, 7-14 Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) (MVS) 14-7 Fort Gibson Lake, OK (SWT) 38-13, 38-22, 38-26 Fort Myers Beach, FL (SAJ) 9-7, 9-41, 9-55 Fort Peck Lake, MT (NWO) 26-13, 26-22, 26-28 Fort Pierce Beach, FL (SAJ) 9-24, 9-47, 9-71 Fort Pierce Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-7, 9-48, 9-55 Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, Missouri River Basin, SD (NWO) 26-13, 26-22, 26-28 Fort Supply Lake, OK (SWT) 38-6, 38-17, 38-24 Fort Wayne Metro Area, IN (LRE) 21-43, 21-75, 21-91 Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, PA (NAB) 4-22, 4-33 Four River Basins, FL (SAJ) 9-34, 9-49, 9-75 I-7 Fourche Bayou Basin, Little Rock, AR (SWL) 37-7, 37-18 Fox River, WI (LRE) 21-10, 21-58, 21-81, 21-100 Francis E. Walter Dam, PA (NAP) 3-15, 3-24, 3-32 Frankfort Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-11, 21-58, 21-81 Frankfort, KY (South Frankfort)(Kentucky River) (LRL) 24-43, 24-16, 24-23 Franklin Falls Dam, NH (NAE) 1-16, 1-29 Freeport Harbor, TX (SWG) 40-3, 4-20, 40-28, 40-45, 40-47, 40-52 Friday Harbor, WA (NWS) 29-3, 29-16, 29-22 Frog Bayou, Crawford County, AR (SWL) 37-16 Fry Creeks, Bixby, OK (SWT) 38-6, 38-17, 38-24 G Galilee Salt Marsh, RI (NAE) 1-14, 1-28 Galisteo Dam, NM (SPA) 36-6, 36-14 Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX (SWG) 40-4, S40-20, 40-29, 4-30 Garrison Dam-Lake Sakakawea, Missouri River Basin, ND (NWO) 26-13, 26-23, 26-28, 28-36 Garrison Dam Major Rehabilitation, Lake Sakakawea, ND (NWO) 26-14, 26-28 Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, VA (NAO) 5-11, 5-18 Gavins Point Dam-Lewis and Clark Lake, Missouri River Basin, NE and SD (NWO) 26-14, 26-23, 26-28, 26-32, 26-36 General Investigations (NWK) 27-10, (NWO) 26-16 General Regulatory Functions (NWO) 26-16, (NWS) 29-42, (MVR) 15-8, (MVK) 12-9, (MVM) 13-2, (MVS) 14-6 General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, PA (NAP) 3-15, 3-24, 3-33 George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, AL & GA (SAM) 10-5, 10-28 Georgetown Harbor, SC (SAC) 7-4, 7-9, 7-14 Gillham Lake, AR (SWL) 37-7, 37-18, 37-30 Gilmore Creek, Winona, MN (MVP) 16-4, 16-14 Glen'Foerd, PA (NAP) 3-15, 3-24, 3-33 Grand Haven Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-11, 21-58, 21-81, 21-96 Grand Isle and Vicinity, LA (MVN) 11-5, 11-13, 11-17 Grand Marais Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-13, 21-59, 21-82, 21-101 Grapevine Lake, TX (SWF) 39-5, 39-15, 39-19 Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA (NWS) 29-3, 29-17, 29-22 Grays Harbor, Point Chehalis, WA (NWS) 29-14, 29-17, 29-23 Grayson Lake, KY (LRH) 25-5, 25-13, 25-18 Great Bend, KS (SWT) 38-6, 38-17, 38-24 Great Egg Harbor Inlet and Peck Beach, NJ (NAP) 3-13, 3-23, 3-32 Great Salt Plains Lake, OK (SWT) 38-6, 38-17, 38-25 Great Sodus Bay Harbor, NY (LRB) 20-6, 20-18, 20-29, 20-43 Green and Barren Rivers, KY (LRL) 24-2, 24-16, 24-21 Green Bay Harbor, WI (LRE) 21-13, 21-59, 21-82 Green Harbor, MA (NAE) 1-5, 1-24 Green Peter-Foster Lakes, OR (NWP) 28-18, 28-29, 28-37 Green River Lake, KY (LRL) 24-9, 24-18, 24-33 Greens Bayou, TX (SWG) 40-13 Greers Ferry Lake, AR (SWL) 37-12, 37-20, 37-30 Greiliekville Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-14, 21-59, 21-82 Guadalupe River, CA (SPK) 35-10, 35-35 Guilford Creek, VA (NAO) 5-4, 5-12 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL & Mexican Border (SAM) 10-12, 10-30, 10-37 (MVN) 11-13 (SWG) 40-5, 40-21, 40-30, 40-31, 40-32, 40-33, 40-45, 40-50, 40-51, 40-52 Gulfport Harbor, MS (SAM) 10-12, 10-30, 10-39 H Hackensack Meadowlands, NJ (NAN) 2-17, 2-26, 2-31, 2-33 Halls Bayou, TX (SWG) 40-13 Halstead, KS (SWT) 38-7, 38-17, 38-25 Hamlet City Lake, NC (SAW) 6-14, 6-25 Hammond Bay Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-14, 21-59, 21-82 Hampton Roads, VA (Collection and Removal of Drift) (NAO) 5-4, 5-13, 5-16 Hancock Brook Lake, CT (NAE) 1-15, 1-28 Hancock County, Seawall, MS (SAM) 10-18, 10-31, 10-41 Hansen Dam, CA (SPL) 33-6, 33-14, 33-22 Harbor Beach Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-15, 21-60, 21-82 Harlan County Lake, Republican River, NE (NWK) 27-3, 27-12, 27-16, 27-28 Harrisville Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-15, 21-60, 21-82 I-8 Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO (NWK) 27-8, 27-14, 27-19, 27-28 Hartwell Dam and Lake, GA and SC (SAS) 8-9, 8-13, 8-19, 8-22 Hastings Harbor, MN 25-7 Hennepin .County, CSAH 116, MN (MVP) 16-5, 16-13, 16-17 Herring Bay & Rockhold Creek, MD (NAB) 4-6, 4-27, 4-35 Herring Creek, Tall Timbers, MD (NAB) 4-6, 4-27, 4-36 Hester, Heartsill and Adamson Creeks, Greenwood, AR (SWL) 37-16 Heyburn Lake and Polecat Creek, OK (SWT) 38-7, 38-18, 38-25 Hidden Dam-Hensley Lake, Fresno River, CA (SPK) 35-11, 35-35 Hidden Lake/Great Marsh, NE (NWO) 26-11, 26-21, 26-27 Hills Creek Lake, OR (NWP) 28-19, 28-29, 28-37 Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, KS (NWK) 27-4, 27-12, 27-16, 27-28 Hodges Village Dam, MA (NAE) 1-19, 1-30 Holes Creek, Ohio (LRL) 24-4, 24-16, 24-22 Holland Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-15, 21-61, 21-83, 21-96 Homer Harbor, AK (POA) 32-3, 32-10, 32-13, 32-16 Homer Spit Erosion, AK (POA) 32-7, 32-12, 32-15 Homme Lake and Dam, ND (MVP) 16-6, 16-13, 16-17 Honga River and Tar Bay, MD (NAB) 4-6, 4-28, 4-36 Hop Brook Lake, CT (NAE) 1-15, 1-28 Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH (NAE) 1-17, 1-29 Hords Creek Lake, TX (SWF) 39-6, 39-16, 39-19 Hornell, NY (NAB) 4-19, 4-32 Horseshoe Bend, WA (NWS) 29-8, 29-16, 29-22 Housatonic River, CT (NAE) 1-14, 1-51 Houston, MN (MVP) 16-6, 16-14, 16-17 Houston-Galveston Navigation Channels, TX (SWG) 40-7, 40-21, 40-33, 40-52 Houston Ship Channel, TX (SWG) 40-7, 40-21, 40-33, 40-34, 40-45, 40-47, 40-53 Howard A. Hanson Dam, WA (NWS) 29-9, 29-19, 29-25 Hudson River at Athens, NY (NAN) 2-4, 2-24, 2-27 Hudson River, NY (NAN) 2-3, 2-24, 2-27, 2-32 Hugo Lake, OK (SWT) 38-7, 38-18, 38-25 Hulah Lake, OK (SWT) 38-8, 38-18, 38-25 Humboldt Harbor and Bay, CA (SPN) 34-2, 34-15, 34-20 Hunting Bayou, TX (SWG) 40-14 Huron Harbor, OH (LRB) 20-6, 20-18, 20-30 Hurricane Barrier Operations New England Division (NAE) 1-24 Hyannis Harbor, MA (NAE) 1-6, 1-24, 1-33 I Ice Harbor Lock and Dam - Lake Sacajawea, WA (NWW) 30-6, 30-13, 30-17, 30-23, 30-28 Illinois and Mississippi Canal, (MVR) IL 15-2, 15-9 Illinois Beach State Park, IL (LRC) 22-9, 22-17, 22- 22 Illinois Waterway, IL (MVS) 14-2 Illinois Waterway, IL and IN (MVR) 15-2, 15-7, 15-8, 15-9, 15-11, 15-18, 15-19, 15-20, 15-25 Indian Bluff, SC (SAC) 7-7, 7-11, 7-17 Indian River Inlet and Bay, DE (NAP) 3-5, 3-21, 3-28 Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Bank Protection, Beverly Shores, IN (LRC) 22-9, 22-17, 22-22 Indiana Harbor, IN (LRC) 22-6, 22-16, 22-20, 22-25 Indiana Shoreline Erosion, IN (LRC) 22-10, 22-17, 22-23 Inland Route, MI (LRE) 21-16, 21-61, 21-83 Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, DE, MD, (NAP) 3-5, 3-21, 3-28 Inland Waterway Rehoboth to Delaware Bay, DE (NAP) 3-6, 3-21, 3-29 Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock, LA (MVN) 11-2 Inspection of Completed Beach Erosion Control Projects (NAE) 1-10 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects Alaska District (POA) 32-7 Albuquerque District (SPA) 36-11 Baltimore District (NAB) 4-23 Buffalo District (LRB) 20-13 Charleston District (SAC) 7-7, 7-22 Detroit District (LRE) 21-47 Fort Worth District, (SWF) 39-12, 39-24 Galveston District (SWG) 40-17 Huntington District (LRH) 25-11, 25-19, 25-24 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-36 Kansas City District (NWK) 27-8, 27-29 Little Rock District (SWL) 37-10 Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-10 Louisville District (LRL) 24-14, 24-35 1-9 Memphis District (MVM) 13-2 Mobile District (SAM) 10-22 Nashville District (LRN) 23-6, 23-18 New England Division (NAE) 1-20 New Orleans District (MVN) 11-9 New York District (NAN) 2-21, 2-33, 2-34, 2-36, 2-38 Omaha District (NWO) 26-9 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-16 Pittsburgh District (LRP) 18-13 Portland District (NWP) 28-13 Rock Island District (MVR) 15-7, 15-16 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-27 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-11, 34-25 Savannah District (SAS) 8-7, 8-13 Seattle District (NWS) 29-10 St. Louis District (MVS) 14-6 St. Paul District (MVP) 16-12 Tulsa District (SWT) 38-12, 38-29 Vicksburg District (MVK) 12-8 Walla Walla District (NWW) 30-2 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-17 Inspection of Completed Works (SAC) 7-7 Inspection of Non-Federal Levees (NAP) 3-16 Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, FL (SAJ) 9-8, 9-43, 9-56 Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, FL (SAJ) 9-9, 9-42, 9-56, 9-78 Irondequoit Bay, NY (LRB) 20-7, 20-18, 20-30 Isabella Lake, Kern River, CA (SPK) 35-11, 35-35 J J. Edward Roush Lake, IN (LRL) 24-10, 24-18 J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN (LRN) 23-7, 23-9, 23-17 J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, GA and SC (Formerly Clarks Hill Lake, GA and SC) (SAS) 8-8, 8-13, 8-19, 8-22 Jackson Hole, WY (NWW) 30-2, 30-13 Jackson Port, Vicinity of Jackson, AL (SAM) 10-9, 10-29, 10-36 Jacksonville Harbor (Mill Cove), FL (SAJ) 9-10, 9-43, 9-57 Jacksonville Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-9, 9-42, 9-57 Jamaica Bay, NY (NAN) 2-5, 2-24, 2-27 James R. Olin Flood Control Project (NAO) 5-11, 5-18 James River, VA (NAO) 5-5, 5-13, 5-22 James W. Trimble Lock and Dam (No. 13) (SWL) 37-3, 37-27 Jemez Canyon Dam, NM (SPA) 36-7, 36-14 Jennings Randolph Lake, MD and WV (NAB) 4-13, 4-29, 4-39 Jim Chapman Lake, TX (SWF) 39-6, 39-16, 39-19 Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, FL & GA (SAM) 10-23, 10-33, 10-43, 10-49 Joe Hardin Lock and Dam (No. 3), AR (SWL) 37-4, 37-26 Joe Pool Lake, TX (SWF) 39-6, 39-16, 39-19 John Day Lock and Dam - Lake Umatilla, OR and WA (NWP) 28-19, 28-30, 28-37, 28-46 John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, VA and NC (SAW) 6-18, 6-26 John Martin Reservoir, CO (SPA) 36-4, 36-13 John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, KS (SWT) 38-7, 38-18, 38-25 John W. Flannagan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, VA (LRH) 25-5, 25-13, 25-18 John's Pass, FL (SAJ) 9-11, 9-43, 9-58 Johnstown, PA (LRP) 18-5, 18-15, 18-20 Jones Creek, VA (NAO) 5-5, 5-13 Jones Inlet, NY (NAN) 2-15, 2-24, 2-28 Joseph G. Minish Passaic River Waterfront and Historic Area, NJ (NAN) 2-17, 2-26, 2-31 K Kahawainui Stream, Oahu, Hawaii (POH) 31-2, 31-5 Kake Harbor, AK (POA) 32-4, 32-10, 32-13, 32-16 Kanawha River, WV (LRH) 25-2, 25-12, 25-17 Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS (NWK) 27-4, 27-12, 27-16, 27-28 Kaw Kawlin River, MI (LRE) 21-45, 21-75, 21-91 Kaw Lake, OK (SWT) 38-8, 38-18, 38-25 Kawaihae Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, HI (POH) 31-2, 31-5, 31-6 Kawainui Marsh, Oahu, HI (POH) 31-3 Kaweah and Tule Rivers, including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, CA (SPK) 35-13, 35-36, 35-43 Kenmore Navigation Channel, WA (NWS) 29-4, 29-17, 29-23 Kennebec River, ME (NAE) 1-6, 1-25 Kenosha Harbor, WI (LRE) 21-17, 21-61, 21-83 Kentucky Lock (LRN) 23-3, 23-9 1-10 Kentucky River, KY (LRL) 24-2, 24-16 Kewaunee Harbor, WI (LRE) 21-17, 21-62, 21-83, 21-96 Keweenaw Waterway, MI (LRE) 21-18, 21-63, 21-83 Keystone Lake, OK (SWT) 38-13, 38-22, 38-26 Kill Van Kull-Newark Bay, N.J. & NY (NAN) 2-6, 2-24, 2-28 King (Water Plant), NC (SAW) 6-14, 6-25 Kings Creek, Tupelo, MS (SAM) 10-19, 10-31 Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, PA and NY, (LRP) 18-8, 18-16, 18-21 Kissimmee River Restoration (SAJ) 9-50, 9-77, 9-78 Klamath River, Klamath Glen Levee, CA (SPN) 34-9, 34-15, 34-23 Knife River Harbor, MN (LRE) 21-19, 21-62, 21-84 Knightville Dam, MA (NAE) 1-12, 1-27 Kodiak Harbor, AK (POA) 32-4, 32-11, 32-14 L LA-LB Harbor (LA Harbor), CA (SPL) 33-2, 33-17, 33-27 Lac La Belle Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-19, 21-62, 21-84 Lackawanna River Basin, PA (NAB) 4-13, 4-39 LaFarge Lake and Channel Improvement, WI (MVP) 16-7, 16-14, 16-18 Laguna Madre Seagrass Restoration, TX (SWG) 40-18, 40-23 Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, ND (MVP) 16-7, 16-14, 16-18 Lake Crockett, WA (NWS) 29-4, 29-17, 29-23 Lake Elsinore, CA (SPL) 33-6, 33-14, 33-23 Lake George, Hobart, IN (LRC) 22-11, 22-17, 22-23 Lake Kemp, TX (SWT) 38-8, 38-19, 38-25 Lake Michigan Diversion (LRC) 22-6, 22-16, 22-21 Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity, LA (Hurricane protection) (MVN) 11-5, 11-13, 11-18 Lake Pontchartrain Stormwater Discharge Project, LA (MVN) 11-6, 11-13, 11-19 Lake St. Clair, MI, Channels in (LRE) 21-20, 21-63, 21-84 Lake Texoma (Denison Dam) OK and TX (SWT) 38-13, 38-22, 38-26 Lake Washington Ship Channel, WA (NWS) 29-5, ,29-17, 29-23 Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, TX (SWT) 38-8, 38-19, 38-25 Larose to Golden Meadow, LA (Hurricane protection) (MVN) 11-6, 11-14, 11-19 Las Cruces, NM (SPA) 32-4, 32-13, 32-16 Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY (LRN) 23-7, 23-9, 23-17 Lavon Lake, TX (SWF) 39-7, 39-16, 39-19 Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement, TX (SWF) 39-7, 39-16, 39-20 Lee County, FL (SAJ) 9-25, 9-48, 9-72 Leland Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-20, 21-63, 21-84 Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big SACdy and Cumberland Rivers, KY, WV and VA (LRH) 25-6, 25-13, 25-18 Lewisville Dam, TX (SWF) 39-7, 39-16, 39-20 Lexington Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-20, 21-63, 21-84 Libby Dam - Lake Koocanusa, MT (NWS) 29-12, 29-20, 29-26 Lincoln Park Beach, Seattle, WA (NWS) 29-7, 29-16, 29-22 Lisle, NY (NAB) 4-19, 4-32 Little Blue River Lakes, MO (NWK) 27-4, 27-12, 27-17 Little Calumet River Basin, Cady Marsh Ditch, IN (LRC) 22-12, 22-18, 22-23 Little Calumet River, IN (LRC) 22-11, 22-17, 22-23, 22-27 Little Dell Lake, UT, CA (SPK) 35-14, 35-36 Little Goose Lock and Dam - Lake Bryan, WA (NWW) 30-6, 30-13, 30-17, 30-24, 30-28 Little Lake Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-21, 21-64, 21-84 Little River Basin, AR (SWL) 37-8, 37-30 Little River Inlet, NC and SC (SAC) 7-4, 7-10, 7-15 Little Sodus Bay Harbor, NY (LRB) 20-7, 20-18, 20-30 Little White Oak Bayou, TX (SWG) 40-14 Littleville Lake, MA (NAE) 1-12, 1-27 Lock and Dam No. 5, AR (SWL) 37-4, 37-26 Lock Haven, PA (NAB) 4-13, 4-30, 4-39 Lock No. 2 and Wilber D. Mills Dam (No. 2), AR (SWL) 37-4, 37-26 Lockwoods Folly River, NC (SAW) 6-6, 6-23 Logan Creek, Pender, NE (NWO) 26-5, 26-18, 26-25 Long Branch Lake, Little Chariton River, MO (NWK) 27-5, 27-12, 27-17 Longboat Pass, FL (SAJ) 9-11, 9-43, 9-58 Lookout Point-Dexter Lakes, OR (NWP) 28-19, 28-30, 28-37 Lorain Harbor, OH (LRB) 20-7, 20-18, 20-30, 20-43 I-11 Los Angeles County Drainage Area, CA (SPL) 33-6, 33-14, 33-23 Los Angeles River Sepulveda to Arroyo Seca Recreation Development, CA (SPL) 33-7, 33-15, 33-24 Lost Creek Lake, Rogue River, OR (NWP) 28-20, 28-30, 28-37 Loves Park, IL (MVR) 15-5, 15-9, 15-13 Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection, OR and WA (NWP) 28-13, 28-28, 28-36 Lower Decatur, NE (NWO) 26-12, 26-22, 26-27 Lower Girard Dam, OH (LRP) 18-8, 18-16 Lower Granite Lock and Dam, WA (NWW) 30-8, 30-13, 30-17, 30-25, 30-28 Lower Monumental Lock and Dam - Lake Herbert G. West, WA (NWW) 30-9, 30-13, 30-17, 30-26, 30-28 Lower Rio Grande Basin, TX (SWG) 40-15, 40-22, 40-39 Lower Savannah River Basin Environmental Restoration Study (SAS) 8-8 Lower Snake River Fish and Wildlife Compensation Plan, WA, OR and ID (NWW) 30-9, 30-13, 30-17 Lower Thorafare, Deal Island, MD (NAB) 4-7, 4-28, 4-36 Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (LRP) 18-9, 18-16, 18-21 Lucky Peak Lake, ID (NWW) 30-2, 30-13 Ludington Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-21, 21-64, 21-85 Lummi Shore Road, WA (NWS) 29-8, 29-19, 29-25 Lynnhaven Inlet VA (NAO) 5-6, 5-13, 5-16 M Maalaea Harbor, Maui, HI (POH) 31-2, 31-5, 31-6 Mad River, Waterbury, (Woodtick Area) CT (NAE), 1-15, 1-28 Mahoning Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (LRP) 18-9, 18-16, 18-21, 18-30 Maintenance and Repair Fleet and Marine Terminals, AR (SWL) 37-5 Manasquan River, NJ (NAP) 3-7, 3-22, 3-29 Manatee County, FL (SAJ) 9-26, 9-48, 9-72 Manatee Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-12, 9-43, 9-58 Manistee Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-22, 21-64, 21-85 Manistique Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-23, 21-65, 21-85 Manitowoc Harbor, WI (LRE) 21-24, 21-65, 21-85, 21-97 Mankato Township, MN (MVP) 16-8, 16-14, 16-18 Mansfield Hollow Lake, CT (NAE) 1-19, 1-30 Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, NC (SAW) 6-6, 6-23 Marina Del Rey, CA (SPL) 33-2, 33-13, 33-19, 33-32 Marion Reservoir, KS (SWT) 38-8, 38-19, 38-25 Marquette Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-24, 21-65, 21-85 Marshall, MN (MVP) 16-8, 16-15, 16-18 Martin County, FL (SAJ) 9-26, 9-47, 9-72 Martins Fork Lake, KY (LRN) 23-5, 23-9, 23-17 Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek, NV and CA (SPK) 35-15, 35-36 Massillon, OH, (LRH) 25-6, 25-14, 25-18, 25-24 Matagorda Ship Channel, TX (SWG) 40-8, 40-21, 40-34, 40-48, 40-53 Mayaguez Harbor, PR (SAJ) 9-12, 9-43, 9-58 Mayfield Creek, KY (MVM) 13-1, 13-3 McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, Bank Stabilization and Channel (SWL) 37-3 McClellan-Kerr Arnkansas River Navigation System, OK (SWT) 38-2, 38-15, 38-24 McCook and Thorton Reservoirs, IL (LRC) 22-12, 22-19, 22-24 McGrath Creek, Wichita Falls, TX (SWT) 38-8, 38-19, 38-25 McKinney Bayou, AR (MVK) 12-4, 12-13, 12-20 McNary Lock and Dam - Lake Wallula, OR and WA (NWW) 30-10, 30-17, 30-26 Melbourne Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-13, 9-43, 9-58 Melrose, WI (MVP) 16-8, 16-15, 16-18 Melvern Lake, Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River, KS (NWK) 27-5, 27-12, 27-17, 27-28 Menominee Harbor and River, MI and WI (LRE) 21-24, 21-66, 21-86 Meramec River Basin Valley Park, MO (MVS) 14-5, 14-8, 14-12 Merced County Stream Group, CA (SPK) 35-17, 35-36 Merced County Streams, CA (SPK) 35-16, 35-37 Mermentau River, Grand Chenier, LA (MVN) 11-7, 11-14, 11-19 Merrimack River Basin, NH and MA (NAE) 1-16, 1-52, 1-53 Metlakatla Harbor, AK (POA) 32-4, 23-10, 32-14 Miami Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-13, 9-44, 9-59 Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, OH (LRP), 18-9, 18-16, 18-22 I-12 Michigan City Harbor, IN (LRC) 22-7, 22-16, 22-21, 22-25 Middle Rio Grande Flood Protection, Bernalillo to Belen, NM (SPA) 36-7, 37-14, 36-17 Middlesboro, Cumberland River Basin, KY (LRN) 23-5, 23-9 Milford Lake, Republican River, KS (NWK) 27-5, 27-13, 27-17, 27-28 Milk River, Matta, MT (NWO) 26-6, 26-18, 26-25 Mill Creek, Bennington Lake, WA (NWW) 30-3, 30-13, 30-16 Mill Creek, OH (LRL) 24-4, 24-16 Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR (SWL) 37-8, 37-18 Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, AL (SAM) 10-24, 10-33, 10-48 Millwood Lake, AR (SWL) 37-8, 37-18, 37-30 Milwaukee Harbor, WI (LRE) 21-25, 21-66, 21-86, 21-97 Mingo Creek, OK (SWT) 38-9, 38-19, 38-25 Minnesota River at Henderson, MN (MVP) 16-7, 16-16 Miscellaneous Work Under Special Authorization San Francisco District (SPN) 34-12 Seattle District (NWS) 29-13 Walla Walla District (NWW) 30-11 Mispillon River (NAP) 3-8, 3-22, 3-29 Mississinewa Lake, IN (LRL) 24-10, 24-18 Mississippi River Between Missouri and Minneapolis, MN (MVS) 14-2 Mississippi River Between the Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN (MVR) 15-4 Mississippi River Between the Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN (MVP) 16-3 Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers, MO and IL (MVS) 14-2, 14-8, 14-10 Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, LA (MVN) 11-2, 11-13, 11-16 Mississippi River Main Stem Model Development (NWK) 27-10 Mississippi River Ship Channel, Gulf to Baton Rouge, LA (MVN) 11-3, 11-13, 11-17 Missouri National Recreational River, NE and SD (NWO) 26-6, 26-19, 26-25 Missouri River Basin Colloboration Effort (NWK) 27-10 Missouri River Between Ft. Peck Dam, MT and Gavins Point Dam, SD & NE (NWO) 26-15, 26-23, 26-28 Missouri River Fish and Wildlife Mitigation, IA, NE, KS and MO (NWK) 27-2, 27-11, 27-15, (NWO) 26-3, 26-17, 26-24 Missouri River, Kenslers Bend, NE to Sioux City, IA (NWO) 26-6, 26-19, 26-25 Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS and MO (Kansas City District) (NWK) 27-6, 27-13, 27-17, 27-24, 27-28 Missouri River Master Water Control Manual Review and Update (NWO) 26-15, 26-23, 26-28 Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE (NWO) 26-3, 26-17, 26-24, (NWK) 27-2, 27-11, 27-15 Mitigation of Shore Damages Detroit District (LRE) 21-42 Mobile Harbor, AL (SAM) 10-12, 10-30, 10-38 Mojave River Dam, Mojave River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-7, 33-15, 33-24 Molly Ann's Brook, NJ (NAP) 3-16, 3-24, 3-33 Monongahela River, PA and WV (LRP) 18-2, 18-15, 18-19, 18-28, 18-29, 18-30 Monroe Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-26, 21-66, 21-86 Monroe Lake, IN (LRL) 24-10, 24-18, 24-33 Moorefield, WV (NAB) 4-14, 4-30, 4-39 Moravian Creek, Wilkesboro, NC (SAW) 6-15, 6-25 Morehead City Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-7, 6-23 Morgan Point Bendway Closure Structure (SWL) 37-15, 37-20 Moriches Inlet, NY (NAN) 2-6, 2-24, 2-28 Morro Bay Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-3, 33-13, 33-19 Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (LRP) 18-10, 18-16 Mount Morris Lake, NY Genesee River (LRB) 20-13, 20-20, 20-36 Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, WA (NWP) 28-14, 28-28, 28-36 Mud Mountain Dam, WA (NWS) 29-10, 29-19, 29-25 Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power (SAC) 7-8, 7-19 Murderkill River, DE (NAP) 3-8, 3-22, 3-29 Murphy Island, SC (SAC) 7-8, 7-11, 7-17 Murray Lock and Dam (No. 7), AR (SWL) 37-4, 37-26 Murrells Inlet, SC (SAC) 7-4, 7-10, 7-15 Muscatine Island, IA (MVR) 15-7, 15-10, 15-14 Muskegon Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-27, 21-67, 21-87 Muskingum River Lakes, OH (LRH) 25-7, 25-14, 25-18 Myrtle Beach, SC (SAC) 7-6, 7-11, 7-16, 7-20 I-13 N N.C., Aquarium, Dare County, NC (SAW) 6-15, 6-25 Nandua Creek (NAO) 5-6, 5-13 Narrows & Lake Champlain, NY (NAN) 2-7, 2-24, 2-28 Nassau County, FL (SAJ) 9-27, 9-48, 9-72 National Emergency Preparedness Buffalo District (LRB) 20-13 Chicago District (LRC) 22-8 Kansas City District) (NWK) 27-10, 27-13 Mobile District (SAM) 10-26 Omaha District (NWO) 26-16 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-17 St. Paul 16-12 Savannah District (SAS) 8-11 Seattle District (NWS) 29-14 Navarro Mills Lake, TX (SWF) 39-9, 39-16, 39-20 Navigation Projects on which Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys only were Conducted during Period (SAJ) 9-22 Navigation Work Under Special Authorization Baltimore District (NAB) 4-11 Buffalo District (LRB) 20-12 Charleston District (SAC) 7-6 Detroit District (LRE) 21-30 Galveston District (SWG) 40-12 Honolulu District (POH) 31-2 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-22 Louisville District (LRL) 24-3 Little Rock District (SWL) 37-5 Memphis District (MVM) 13-1 Mobile District (SAM) 10-17, 10-46 Nashville District (LRN) 23-4 New Orleans District (MVN) 11-4, 11-22 New York District (NAN) 2-12 Norfolk District (NAO) 5-10 Omaha District (NWO) 26-3 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-17 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-8 Savannah District (SAS) 8-6 St. Louis District (MVS) 14-3 Vicksburg District (MVK) 12-3 Neahsco Creek, MD (NAB) 4-7, 4-28, 4-36 Neah Bay, WA (NWS) 29-5, 29-17, 29-23 Neah Bay, WA (Section 101) (NWS) 29-4, 29-14, 29-20 Neuse River, NC (SAW) 6-8, 6-23, 6-34 Neuse River Basin, NC (SAW) 6-15 New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, MA (NAE) 1-17, 1-29 New Buffalo Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-28, 21-67, 21-87 New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway (NAP) 3-8, 3-22, 3-30 New Melones Lake, CA (SPK) 35-28 New Orleans to Venice, LA (Hurricane protection) (MVN) 11-7, 11-14, 11-19 New Pass, Sarasota, FL (SAJ) 9-14, 9-44, 9-60 New York and New Jersey Channels (NAN) 2-10, 2-25, 2-29 New York City Watershed, NY (NAN) 2-18, 2-26, 2-31 New York Harbor and Adjacent Channels (Port Jersey) (NAN) 2-8, 2-24, 2-28, 2-33 New York Harbor-Collection and Removal of Drift (NAN) 2-8, 2-25, 2-29 New York Harbor-Entrance Channels and Anchorage Areas (NAN) 2-10, 2-21, 2-26 Newark Bay, Hackensack and Passaic River, NY (NAN) 2-7, 2-24, 2-28 Newark, OH (LRH) 25-7, 25-14, 25-18, 25-21, 25-24 Newport Bay Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-3, 33-13, 33-19, 33-27 Newport News Creek, VA (NAO) 5-6, 5-13 Nimrod Fisheries Restoration (SWL) 37-15 Nimrod Lake, AR (SWL) 37-8, 37-29 Nimrod Waterfowl Levee (SWL) 37-15, 37-20 Ninilchik Harbor, AK (POA) 32-4, 32-10, 32-14 Nishnabotna River, Hamburg, IA (NWO) 26-6, 26-19, 26-25 Nogales Wash, AZ (SPL) 33-7, 33-15, 33-24 Nolin Lake, KY (LRL) 24-11, 24-19, 24-33 Nome Harbor, AK (POA) 32-4, 32-10, 32-14 Norco Bluffs, CA (SPL) 33-7, 33-15, 33-24 Norfolk Harbor and Channels, VA (NAO) 5-6, 5-13 Norfolk Lake, AR (SWL) 37-13, 37-20, 37-30 Norrel Lock and Dam (No. 1) and Entrance Channel, AR (SWL) 37-4, 37-26 North Branch, Chicago River, IL (LRC) 22-12, 22-18, 22-23 North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, OH (LRH) 25-7, 25-14, 25-18 North Ellenville, NY (NAN) 2-18, 2-26, 2-31 North Fork of Pound River Lake, VA (LRH) 25-8, 25-14, 25-19 North Hartland Lake, VT (NAE) 1-13, 1-27 1-14 North Springfield Lake, VT (NAE) 1-13, 1-27 Northeast River, MD (NAB) 4-7, 4-28, 4-36 Northfield Brook Lake, CT (NAE) 1-15, 1-38 Nutwood Drainage and Levee District, IL (MVS) 14-5, 14-13, 14-17, 14-22 NYS Canal System (LRB) 20-8, 20-18, 20-31 O O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake, TX (SWF) 39-8, 39-16, 39-20 Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, Missouri River Basin, SD and ND (NWO) 26-14, 26-23, 26-28, 26-33, 26-36 Oak Orchard, NY (LRB) 20-8, 20-18, 20-32 Oakland Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-3, 34-16, 34-21 Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD (1954 River & Harbor Act) (NAB) 4-7, 4-28, 4-36 Oceanside Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-3, 33-13, 33-19, 33-32 Oceanside Harbor Sand By-Pass, CA (SPL) 33-3, 33-13, 33-19 Oconto Harbor, WI (LRE) 21-28, 21-68, 21-87 Ocracoke Inlet, NC (SAW) 6-8, 6-24 O'Hare Reservoir, IL (LRB) 22-13, 22-18, 22-23 Ohio River Basin Huntington District (LRH) 25-8, 25-14 Louisville District (LRL) 24-11, 24-19, 24-21 Nashville District (LRN) 23-6, 23-12, 23-17 . Pittsburgh District (LRP) 18-10, 18-16, 18-22 Ohio River Flood Protection (LRL) 24-4, 24-16 Okatibbee Lake, MS (SAM) 10-19, 10-31 Okeechobee Waterway, FL (SAJ) 9-14, 9-44, 9-60, 9-83 Oklawaha River, FL (SAJ) 9-15, 9-44, 9-61 Olcott Harbor, NY (LRB) 20-8, 20-18, 20-32 Oliver Lock and Dam (Replacement), AL (SAM) 10-9, 10-29, 10-36 Olympia Harbor, WA (NWS) 29-6, 29-18, 29-23 Olyphant, Lackawanna River, PA (NAB) 4-14, 4-30, 4-39 Onandaga Storm Water Discharge (LRB) 20-14, 20-21 Ontonagon Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-28, 21-68, 21-87, 21-97 Oologah Lake, OK (SWT) 38-9, 38-19, 38-25, 38-28 Open Channel Work, Licking River, KY (LRL) 24-2, 24-16 Open Channel Work, Ohio River (LRH) 25-2, (ORD) 19-3, 19-4, 19-5, (LRP) 18-3, (LRL) 24-3 Optima Lake, OK (SWT) 38-9, 38-20, 38-25 Oriental (South Avenue), NC (SAW) 6-16, 6-24 Oswego Harbor, NY (LRB) 20-9, 20-18, 20-33 Other Authorized Beach Erosion Projects Chicago District (LRC) 22-10, 22-26 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-31 Mobile District (SAM) 10-17, 10-44 New York District (NAN) 2-17 Other Authorized Bridge Alterations (LRC) 22-8, 22-26 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects Albuquerque District (SPA) 36-12, 36-18 Buffalo District (LRB) 20-13 Charleston District (SAC) 7-7, 7-19 Chicago District (LRC) 22-14, 22-26 Detroit District (LRE) 21-47 Fort Worth District (SWF) 39-12, 39-23 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-36 Little Rock District (SWL) 37-10, 37-24 Louisville District (LRL) 24-14, 24-25 Mobile District (SAM) 10-17, 10-22, 10-45 New York Division (NAN) 2-22 Pittsburgh District (LRP) 18-13 Rock Island District (MVR) 15-7, 15-21 Savannah District (SAS) 8-7, 8-21 Tulsa District (SWT) 38-12 Other Authorized Navigation Projects Buffalo District (LRB) 20-12, 20-39 Charleston District (SAC) 7-6 Detroit District (LRE) 21-40 Huntington District (LRH) 25-2, 25-20 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-22 Little Rock District (SWL) 37-5, 37-23 Louisville District (LRL) 24-3, 24-24 Mobile District (SAM) 10-17, 10-44 New England Division (NAE) 1-36 New York District (NAN) 2-12 Pittsburgh District (LRP) 18-4 Rock Island District (MVR) 15-4, 15-15 Savannah District (SAS) 8-6, 8-18 Tulsa District (SWT) 38-12 Other Authorized Shore Protection Projects Buffalo District (LRB) 20-13, 20-13, 20-40 Charleston District (SAC) 7-6, 7-18 Other Programs and Activities (MVS) 14-6 Other Work Under Special Authority I-15 St. Paul District (MVP) 16-12 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-31 Otter Brook Lake, NH (NAE) 1-13, 1-27 Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR (MVK) 12-2, 12-10, 12-12 Ouachita River and Tributaries, AR and LA (MVK) 12-5, 12-13, 12-16 Ouachita River Levees, LA (MVK) 12-4, 12-11 Oxford, NY (NAB) 4-19, 4-32 Oyster Channel, VA (NAO) 5-8, 5-13 Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam (No. 12), AR (SWL) 37-13, 37-20, 37-27 P Paint Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (LRH) 25-8, 25-14, 25-19 Painted Rock Dam (Gila River), AZ (SPL) 33-8, 33-15, 33-24 Paintsville Lake, KY (LRH) 25-8, 25-15, 25-19 Pajaro River, CA (SPK) 35-17, 35-37 Palm Beach County, FL (SAJ) 9-28, 9-48, 9-73 Palm Beach Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-15, 9-44, 9-61 Palm Beach Island, FL (SAJ) 9-28, 9-48, 4-73 Palm Valley Bridge, FL (SAJ) 9-16, 9-44, 9-62 Pamlico and Tar Rivers, NC (SAW) 6-8, 6-24, 6-35 Panama City Harbor, FL (SAM) 10-13, 10-30, 10-39 Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lakes, NE (NWO) 26-7, 26-19, 26-25 Parker Creek, VA (NAO) 5-8, 5-13 Parker Lake, OK (SWT) 38-9, 38-20, 38-25 Pascagoula Harbor, MS (SAM) 10-14, 10-30, 10-39 Passaic River Basin, N.J. & NY (NAN) 2-19, 2-26, 2-31, 2-33, 2-37 Pat Mayse Lake, TX (SWT) 38-10, 38-20, 38-25 Patchogue River, CT (NAE) 1-7, 1-25 Patoka Lake, IN (LRL) 24-11, 24-19, 24-33 Paxton Creek, Harrisburg, PA (NAB) 4-14, 4-30, 4-39 Pearl River Basin, MS and LA (MVK) 12-5, 12-11, 12-14 Pearl River, Slidell, St. Tammany Parish, LA (MVK) 12-7, 12-11, 12-14 Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake, KS (SWT) 38-10, 38-20, 38-25 Pebble Creek, Scribner, NE (NWO) 26-7, 26-19, 26-25 Pensacola Harbor, FL (SAM) 10-30, 10-40 Pentwater Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-29, 21-68, 21-87, 21-97 Perdido Pass Channel, AL (SAM) 10-15, 10-30, 10-40 Permit Evaluation (SAJ) 9-37 Perry Creek, IA (NWO) 26-7, 26-20, 26-25 Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS (NWK) 27-6, 27-13, 27-17, 27-28 Petaluma River, Petaluma, CA (SPN) 34-10, 34-16, 34-23 Petersburg, WV (NAB) 4-15, 4-30, 4-39 Petoskey Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-30, 21-68, 21-87 Philpott Lake, VA (SAW) 6-18, 6-26 Phoenix, AZ and Vicinity (Including New River)(Stage 2 and Remaining Work) (SPL) 33-8, 33-16, 33-26 Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (Kansas City District) (NWK) 27-6, 27-17 Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program (Omaha District) (NWO), 26-8, 26-26, 26-36 Pine and Mathews Canyons Dams, Colorado River Basin, NV (SPL) 33-8, 33-15 Pine Creek Lake, TX (SWT) 38-10, 38-20, 38-25 Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, CA (SPK) 35-17, 35-37 Pinellas County, FL (SAJ) 9-29, 9-48, 9-73 Pipestem Lake, ND (NWO) 26-8, 26-20, 26-26 Planning AssistaLRE to States (SAS) 8-11 Planning, Engineering and Design (NAE) 1-22 Plymouth Harbor, MA (NAE) 1-7, 1-25 Point Beach, Milford, CT (NAE) 1-9, 1-26, 1-34 Point Lookout Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-30, 21-68, 21-87 Poloa Area, American Samoa (POH) 36-8 Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, MO (NWK) 27-6, 27-13, 27-18, 27-28 Pomona Lake, One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, KS (NWK) 27-7, 27-13, 27-18 Ponce de Leon Inlet, FL (SAJ) 9-16, 9-45, 9-62 Ponce Harbor, PR (SAJ) 9-16, 9-44, 9-61 Pond Creek, KY (LRL) 24-5, 24-16, 24-23 Poplar Island, MD (NAB) 4-24, 4-33, 4-41 Port Austin Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-30, 21-69, 21-88 Port Clinton Harbor, OH (LRB) 20-9, 20-19, 20-33 Port Everglades Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-17, 9-44, 9-63 Port Hueneme, CA (SPL) 33-4, 33-13, 33-19, 30-32 Port of Long Beach, CA (SPL) 33-14, 33-15, 33-19 1-16 Port Orford, OR (NWP) 28-7, 28-26, 28-34 Port Royal Harbor, SC (SAC) 7-5, 7-10, 7-15 Port Sanilac Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-31, 21-69, 21-88 Port Washington Harbor, WI (LRE) 21-31, 21-69, 21-88 Port Wing Harbor, WI (LRE) 21-31, 21-70, 21-88 Portage Lake Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-32, 21-70, 21-88 Portage, WI (MVP) 16-9, 16-15, 16-18 Portland Harbor, ME (NAE) 1-8, 1-25 Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR (SAJ) 9-34, 9-49, 9-76 Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, DC, Collection and Removal of Drift (NAB) 4-8, 4-28, 4-36 Potomac River - Aquatic Plant Control, MD, VA, DC (NAB) 4-8, 4-27, 4-35 Potomac River at Alexandria, VA (NAB) 4-8, 4-28, 4-37 Potomac River below Washington, DC (NAB) 4-9, 4-28, 4-37 Preconstruction Engineering and Design - See Advance Engineering and Design Preservation of Natural Flood Storage, Passaic River, NJ (NAN) 2-19, 2-26, 2-31 Presque Isle Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-32, 21-70, 21-88 Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, PA (LRB) 20-12, 20-20, 20-36 Prevention of Obstructions and Injurious Deposits, Baltimore Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-9, 4-29, 4-37 Proctor Lake, TX (SWF) 39-9, 39-18, 39-22 Project Condition Surveys Portland District (NWP) 28-7 Seattle District (NWS) 29-6 Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment (SAS) 8-8 (SWG) 40-18 (LRE) 21-42, (SAM) 10-26, (LRP) 18-14, (NWO) 26-10, (SAW) 6-20, 6-26, (LRB) 20-14 Projects Not Specifically Authorized (NWP) 28-21 Prompton Lake, PA (NAP) 3-17, 3-24, 3-33 Protection of Navigation (MVN) 11-9 Providence River and Harbor, RI (NAE) 1-8, 1-25, 1-34 Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, WA (NWS) 29-6, 29-15, 29-24 Punxsatawney, Ohio River Basin, PA (LRP) 18-5, 18-15, 18-20 Q Quillayute River, WA (NWS) 29-6, 29-18, 29-24 Quonset Point, Davisville, RI (NAE) 1-17, 1-25, 1-34 R R.D. Bailey Lake, WV (LRH) 25-9, 25-15, 25-19 Rampano at Oakland, NJ (NAN) 2-20, 2-26, 2-31, 2-37 Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook, NJ (NAN) 2-13, 2-25, 2-30 Raritan River Basin, Greenbook Sub-Basin, NJ (NAN) 2-20, 2-26, 2-31 Rathbun Lake, Chariton River, IA (NWK) 27-7, 27-13, 27-19 Ray Roberts Lake, TX (SWF) 39-8, 39-17, 39-20 Raymondville Drain, TX (SWG) 40-16 Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, Juniata River, PA (NAB) 4-15, 4-30, 4-39 Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys Baltimore District (NAB) 4-11 Buffalo District (LRB) 20-11 Charleston District (SAC) 7-16 Chicago District (LRC) 22-8 Detroit District (LRE) 21-40 Galveston District (SWG) 40-12 Honolulu District (POH) 31-2 Mobile District (SAM) 10-17 New York District (NAN) 2-12 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-18 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-8 Savannah District (SAS) 8-6 Red River Basin Chloride Control, TX & OK (SWT) 38-4, 38-15 Red River below Denison Dam, levees and bank stabiliation (Vicksburg District) (MVK) 12-7, 12-15, 21-20 Red River below Denison Dam (Vicksburg District) (MVK) 12-7, 12-11, 12-20, 12-21 Red River Emergency Bank Protection (MVK) 12-2, 12-10, 12-12 Red River-Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA (MVK) 12-3, 12-10, 12-12, 12-15 Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, IA (MVR) 15-6, 15-10, 15-13 Redbank and Fancher Creeks, CA (SPK) 35-19, 35-37 I-17 Redondo Beach Harbor (King Harbor), CA (SPL) 33-4, 33-13, 33-20, 33-27 Regulation of Hydraulic Minings and Preparation of Plans (California Debris Commission) 35-1A, 35-7A, 35-10A Regulatory Functions Program Mobile District (SAM) 10-26 Savannah District (SAS) 8-11 St. Paul District (MVP) 16-12 Regulatory Programs (NWK) 27-10, (NAB) 4-25 Removal of Aquatic Growth from Navigable Waters in the State of Florida, (SAJ) 9-18, 9-45, 9-64 Research and Development Pittsburgh District (LRP) 18-14 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-30 Savannah District (SAS) 8-11 Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, MN (MVP) 16-3, 16-13, 16-17, 16-26 Restoration Work Under Special Authorization (SAJ) 9-39 Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, GA and SC (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake, GA and SC) (SAS) 8-10, 8-19, 8-22 Richmond Harbor (Deepening), CA (SPN) 34-4, 34-16, 34-22 Rillitoo River, AZ (SPL) 33-8, 33-15, 33-25 Rio De La Plata, PR (SAJ) 9-35, 9-50, 9-76 Rio Grande Basin, NM (SPA) 36-4, 36-14, 36-16, 36-18 Rio Grande Floodway, NM (SPA) 36-7, 36-14, 36-17, 36-18 Rio Puerto Nuevo, PR (SAJ) 9-35, 9-50, 9-76 Rio Salado, Phoenix Reach, AZ (SPL) 33-12, 33-16 Rio Salado, Tempe Reach, AZ (SPL) 33-12, 33-16 Roanoke River, NC (SAW) 6-9, 6-24 Roanoke River, 50-mile long Channel from Palmyra Landing to Weldon (SAW) 6-31 Roanoke River Basin, VA and NC (SAW) 6-18 Roanoke River Upper Basin, VA Headwaters Area (SAW) 6-16, 6-25 Robert Douglas Willis Hydropower, TX (SWF) 39-12, 39-21 Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam, AL (SAM) 10-24, 10-33, 10-48 Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, OK (SWT) 38-13, 38-22, 38-26 Rochester Harbor, NY (LRB) 20-9, 20-19, 20-34 Rochester, MN (MVP) 16-9, 16-15, 16-18 Rock Hall Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-9, 4-29, 4-37 Rockaway Inlet to Norton Point (Coney Island) NY (NAN) 2-16, 2-26, 2-30 Rocky River, OH (LRB) 20-10, 20-20, 20-34 Rogue River Harbor at Gold Beach, OR (NWP) 28-7, 28-26, 28-34 Rollinson Channel, NC (SAW) 6-9, 6-24, 6-35 Rondout Harbor (NAN) 2-10, 2-25, 2-30 Rooster Island, Dorchester County, MD (NAB) 4-24, 4-33, 4-41 Roseville, OH (LRH) 25-9, 25-15, 25-19, 25-24 Rouge River, MI (LRE) 21-33, 21-71, 21-88, 21-97 Rough River Lake and Channel Improvement, KY (LRL) 24-12, 24-19 Roughans Point, Revere, MA (NAE) 1-17, 1-30, 1-35 Rudee Inlet, VA (NAO) 5-8, 5-13, 5-17 Russian River Basin including Dry Creek (Warm Springs Lake) and Lake Mendocino (Coyote Valley Dam), CA (SPK) 35-20, 35-37, 35-45, 35-54, (SPN) 34-10, 34-16, 34-23, 34-26 S Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX (SWG) 40-9, 40-21, 40-34, 40-35, 40-45, 40-48, 40-53 Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA (debris control) 35-2A, 35-7A Sacramento River and Tributaries from Collinsville to Shasta Dam, CA (SPK) 35-21, 35-38, 35-44, 35-55 Sacramento River, CA 35-4A, 35-7A, 35-11A, 35-12A Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, CA (SPK) 35-3, 35-33 Saginaw River, MI (LRE) 21-33, 21-45, 21-71, 21-75, 21-89, 21-91, 21-97 Salamonie Lake, IN (LRL) 24-12, 24-19 Salem Harbor, MA (NAE) 1-8, 1-25, 1-34 Salem River, NJ (NAP) 3-9, 3-22, 3-30 Salt Creek and Tributaries, NE (NWO) 26-8, 26-20, 26-27 Salyersville, KY (LRL) 24-5, 24-16, 24-23, 24-30 Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, TX (SWF) 39-13, 39-20 Sammamish River Weir Restoration, WA (NWS) 29-13, 29-20, 29-26 I-18 San Acacia to Bosque del Apache Unit, NM (SPA) 36-8, 36-17 San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX (SWF) 39-9, 39-17, 39-20 San Diego Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-4, 33-13, 33-20, 30-32 San Diego River & Mission Bay, CA (SPL) 33-5, 33-14, 33-21, 33-32 San Francisco Bay and Delta Model, CA (SPN) 34-6 San Francisco Bay Long Term Management Strategy (LTMS), CA (SPN) 34-7 San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) (SPN) 34-5, 34-17 San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels), CA (SPK) 35-4, 35-33 San Gabriel River, TX (SWF) 39-9, 39-17, 39-21, 39-23 San Joaquin River, CA (SPK) 35-4, 35-33 San Juan Harbor, PR (SAJ) 9-20, 9-46, 9-65 San Lorenzo Creek, CA (SPK) 35-23, 38-38 San Luis Rey River, CA (SPL) 33-9, 33-15, 33-26 Sanders Creek, Boscobel, WI (MVP) 16-9, 16-15, 16-18 Sandusky Harbor, OH (LRB) 20-10, 20-20, 20-34 Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet, N.J. (NAN) 2-16, 2-26, 2-31, 2-33, 2-35, 2-36 Santa Ana River Basin and Orange County, CA (SPL) 33-9, 33-15, 33-25, 33-31 Santa Ana River Mainstem, CA (SPL) 33-8, 33-15, 33-25 Santa Barbara Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-5, 33-14, 33-21, 33-32 Santa Mdnica Breakwater, CA (SPL) 33-5, 33-14, 33-22 Santa Paula Creek, CA (SPL) 33-9, 33-15, 33-26 Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, NM (SPA) 36-8, 36-15 Sarasota County, FL (SAJ) 9-30, 9-49, 9-73 Sardis Lake, OK (SWT) 38-10, 38-20, 38-25 Saugatuck Harbor and Kalamazoo River, MI (LRE) 21-36, 21-72, 21-89 Savannah Harbor, GA (SAS) 8-3, 8-12, 8-16 Savannah River Basin at Oates Creek, GA (SAS) 8-7, 8-12 Savannah River Basin, GA and SC (SAS) 8-8, 8-19, 8-22 Savannah River Below Augusta, GA (SAS) 8-5, 8-12, 8-18 Saw Mill Run, PA (LRP) 18-5, 18-15 Saxon Harbor, WI (LRE) 21-36, 21-72, 21-90 Saylorville Lake, IA (MVR) 15-6, 15-10, 15-13 SC DOT Bridges, SC (SAC) 7-7, 7-11, 7-17 Scappoose Drainage District, OR (NWP) 28-14, 28-28, 28-36 Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations Albuquerque District (SPA) 36-11 Baltimore District (NAB) 4-23 Fort Worth District (SWF) 39-12 Kansas City District (NWK) 27-8 Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-10 Mobile District (SAM) 10-26 Omaha District (NWO) 26-9, 26-21 Portland District (NWP) 28-14 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-28 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-12 Seattle District (NWS) 29-10 Tulsa District (SWT) 38-12 Walla Walla District (NWW) 30-4 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-18 Schuylkill River, PA (NAP) 3-10, 3-22, 3-30, 3-35 Scranton, PA (NAB) 4-15, 4-30, 4-39 Scranton, Lackawanna River, PA (NAB) 4-15, 4-30, 4-39 Seattle Harbor, WA (NWS) 29-7, 29-18, 29-24 Sebago Lake, SACdish, MA (NAE) 1-18, 1-30, 1-35 Sebewaing River, MI (LRE) 21-37, 21-47, 21-72, 21-76, 21-90, 21-91 Seekonk River, RI (NAE) 1-8, 1-25, 1-34 Sepulveda Dam, CA (Recreation Development) (SPL) 33-9, 33-17 Sesuit Harbor, MA (NAE) 1-9, 1-26, 1-34 Shallotte River, NC (SAW) 6-9, 6-24 Sheboygan Harbor, WI (LRE) 21-27, 21-57, 21-76 Shenango River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA and OH (LRP) 18-10, 18-17, 18-23 Sheyenne River, ND (MVP) 16-10, 16-15, 16-18 Shinnecock Inlet, NY (NAN) 2-11, 2-25, 2-30 Shipyard River, SC (SAC) 7-5, 7-10, 7-16 Shoal Harbor and Compton Creek, NJ (NAN) 2-11, 2-25, 2-30, 2-33, 2-35 Shore Protection Projection Under Special Authority Buffalo District (LRB) 20-13 Charleston District (SAC) 7-7 Silver Bay Harbor, MN (LRE) 21-37, 21-73, 21-90 Silver Lake Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-9, 6-24, 6-29, 6-35 Sims Bayou, TX (SWG) 40-16, 40-22, 40-39 1-19 Sitka Harbor, AK (POA) 32-5, 32-11, 32-14, 32-16 Siuslaw River, OR (NWP) 28-7, 28-26, 28-34 Skiatook Lake, OK (SWT) 38-10, 38-20, 38-25 Skipanon Channel, OR (NWP) 28-8, 28-26, 28-34 Smithville Lake, Little Platte River, MO (NWK) 27-7, 27-13, 27-19 Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, OR, WA and ID (NWW) 30-11, 30-14, 30-18 Somerville Lake, TX (SWF) 39-11, 39-17, 39-21 Sonoma Baylands Wetlands Demonstration Project (SPN) 34-6, 34-18, 34-22 Souris River Basin, ND (MVP) 16-10, 16-16, 16-18, 16-29 South Central Pennsylvania Environmental Improvement, PA (NAP) 3-18, 3-25, 3-33 South Central Pennsylvania Environmental Restoration (LRP) 18-5, 18-15, (NAB) 4-15, 4-30, 4-39 South Haven Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-38, 21-73, 21-90 South Main Channel, TX (SWG) 40-15 South Platte River Basin, CO (NWO) 26-8, 26-27 Southeast Louisiana Urban Drainage Project (MVN) 11-8, 11-14, 11-19 Southeastern Pennsylvania, PA (NAP) 3-18, 3-25, 3-33 Southern and Eastern, KY (LRL) 24-6, 24-17, 24-30 Southern New York Flood Control Projects (NAB) 4-16, 4-40 Southwestern Jefferson County, KY (LRL) 24-5, 24-17, 24-30 Sowashee Creek, Meridian, MS (SAM) 10-19, 10-32 St. Augustine Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-18, 9-45, 9-64 St. Clair River, MI (LRE) 21-34, 21-71, 21-89, 21-97, 21-99 St. Croix River, Stillwater, MN (MVP) 16-11, 16-16, 16-19 St. Genevieve, MO (MVS) 14-5, 14-9, 14-22 St. George, AK (POA) 32-5, 32-11, 32-14 St. John River Basin, ME (NAE) 1-18, 1-30, 1-35 St. Johns County, FL (SAJ) 9-29, 9-48, 9-72 St. Johns River, Jacksonville to Lake Harney, FL (SAJ) 9-19, 9-46, 9-64 St. Joseph Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-35, 21-71, 21-89 St. Louis Bay St. Louis, MS (SAM) 10-19, 10-31 St. Louis Harbor, MO and IL (MVS) 14-3, 14-11, 14-22 St. Lucie Inlet, FL (SAJ) 9-20, 9-46, 9-65 St. Marys River, MI (LRE) 21-50, 21-76, 21-92, 21-98 St. Paul, MN (MVP) 16-11, 16-16, 16-19 St. Paul Island Harbor, AK (POA) 32-6, 32-11, 32-14 Stamford, CT (NAE) 1-18, 1-30 Stillaguamish River, WA (NWS) 29-11, 29-19, 29-25 Stillhouse Hollow Dam, TX (SWF) 39-10, 39-17, 39-21 Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, PA (NAB) 4-20, 4-32, 4-40 Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO (NWK) 27-8, 27-14, 27-19, 27-28 Stonewall Jackson Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (LRP) 18-11, 18-17, 18-23 Streambank Erosion Under Special Authorization (SAC) 7-7, 7-20 Studies (SAJ) 9-37 Sturgeon Bay and Lake Michigan Ship Canal, WI (LRE) 21-38, 21-73, 21-90 Summersville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (LRH) 25-9, 25-15, 25-19 Supervisor of New York Harbor (NAN) 2-12, 2-25, 2-32 Supervisor of the Harbor of Hampton Roads (Prevention of Obstructive and Injurious Deposits) (NAO) 5-8, 5-14 Surfside, Sunset and Newport Beach, CA (SPL) 33-5, 33-14, 33-22 Surry Mountain Lake, NH (NAE) 1-13, 1-27 Surveillance of Northern Waters and International Water Studies (LRE) 21-48 Surveys Alaska District (POA) 32-7 Albuquerque District (SPA) 36-12 Baltimore District (NAB) 4-25 Buffalo District (LRB) 20-15 Chicago District (LRC) 22-14 Detroit District (LRE) 21-53 Fort Worth District (SWF) 39-14 Galveston District (SWG) 40-18 Honolulu District (POH) 31-3 Huntington District (LRH) 25-11 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-36 Little Rock District (SWL) 37-14 Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-11 Louisville District (LRL) 24-15, 24-39 Mobile District (SAM) 10-26 Nashville District (LRN) 23-8 New England Division (NAE) 1-22 New York District (NAN) 2-22 I-20 Norfolk District (NAO) 5-11 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-19 Pittsburgh District (LRP) 18-13 Portland District (NWP) 28-23 Rock Island District (MVR) 15-8 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-30 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-12 Savannah District (SAS) 8-11 Seattle District (NWS) 29-14 St. Paul District (MVP) 16-13 Tulsa District (SWT) 38-14 Walla Walla District (NWW) 30-11 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-21 Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects, NY and PA (NAB) 4-20, 4-40 Sutton Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (LRH) 25-9, 25-15, 25-19 Sweetwater River, CA (SPL) 33-9, 33-15, 33-26 Swinomish Channel, WA (NWS) 29-7, 29-18, 29-24 T Table Rock Lake, MO (SWL) 37-13, 37-20, 37-30 Tacoma, Puyallup River, WA (NWS) 29-11, 29-20, 29-25 Tampa Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-21, 9-46, 9-47, 9-67 Taylorsville Lake, KY (LRL) 24-3, 24-19, 24-35 Tedious Creek, MD (NAB) 4-10, 4-29, 4-37 Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK (SWT) 38-13, 38-23, 38-26 Tennessee River, TN, AL & KY (LRN) 23-3, 23-9, 23-11, 23-17 Tenressee-Tombigbee Waterway AL & MS (SAM) 10-15, 10-31, 10-40, 10-51 Tennessee-Tombigbee Wildlife Mitigation, AL and MS (SAM) 10-16, 10-31, 10-41 Texas City Channel, TX (SWG) 40-10, 40-21, 40-36, 40-37, 40-45, 40-49, 40-53 Thames River Basin, CT, RI and MA (NAE) 1-18, 1-30, 1-53, 1-54 The Dalles Lock and Dam - Lacke Celilo, WA and OR (NWP) 28-21, 28-30, 28-37 Thimble Shoals Channel, VA (NAO) 5-9, 5-14, 5-17, 5-23 Thomaston Dam, CT (NAE) 1-16, 1-29 Threemile Creek, Mobile, LA (SAM) 10-20, 10-32 Thurman to Hamburg, IA (NWO) 26-9, 26-20, 26-27 Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR (NWP) 28-8, 28-27, 28-34 Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA (NAB) 4-21, 4-32 Tionesta Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (LRP) 18-11, 18-17, 18-23 Toad Suck Ferry Lock and Dam (No. 8), AR (SWL) 37-5, 37-26 Toledo Harbor, OH (LRB) 20-10, 20-20, 20-35 Tom Jenkins Dam, Ohio River Basin, OH (LRH) 25-10, 25-15, 25-19 Tombigbee River (East Fork), MS & AL (SAM) 10-20, 10-32 Tombigbee River & Tributaries, MS & AL (SAM) 10-20, 10-32, 10-42 Toronto Lake, KS (SWT) 38-10, 38-21, 38-25, 38-28 Town Bluff Dam-B.A. Steinhagen Lake, TX 39-13, 39-21 Town Brook, Quincy and Braintree, MA (NAE) 1-20, 1-31, 1-35 Town Creek, SC (SAC) 7-6, 7-10, 7-16 Townshend Lake, VT (NAE) 1-13, 1-27 Treatment of Yuba River Debris Situation-restraining Barriers, CA 35-3A, 35-7A Trinidad Lake, CO (SPA) 36-9, 36-15 Trinity River and Tributaries, TX (SWG) 40-10, 40-22, 40-37, 40-38, 40-45, 40-49, 40-53 Trinity River Project, TX (SWF) 39-2 Tropicana and Flamingo Washes, NV (SPL) 33-10, 33-15, 33-26 Tuckerton Creek (NAP) 3-11, 3-23, 3-30 Tucson Drainage Area, AZ (SPL) 33-12, 33-18, 33-30 Tucson Diversion Channel (Recreation Development) (SPL) 33-10, 33-16, 33-26 Tug and Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, WV, VA and KY (LRN) 23-5, 23-9 Tully Lake, MA (NAE) 1-14, 1-27 Tulsa and West Tulsa Levees, OK (SWT) 38-11, 38-21, 38-25 Turtle Creek, PA (LRP) 18-6, 18-15 Tuttle Creek Lake, Big Blue River, KS (NWK) 27-7, 27-13, 27-19, 27-28 Twitch Cove and Big Thorofare, MD (NAB) 4-10, 4-29, 4-37 Two Harbors, MN (LRE) 21-39, 21-74, 21-90 Two Rivers Dam, NM (SPA) 36-10, 36-15 Two Rivers Harbor, WI (LRE) 21-39, 21-74, 21-91 Tybee Island, GA (SAS) 8-6, 8-12, 8-18 Tygart Lake, WV (LRP) 18-3, 18-15, 18-20 1-21 U Umpqua River, OR (NWP) 28-9, 28-27, 28-35 Union City Dam, Ohio River Basin, PA (LRP) 18-12, 18-17, 18-23 Union Village Dam, VT (NAE) 1-14, 1-28 Upper Gordon Creek, Hattiesburg, MS (SAM) 10-21, 10-32, 10-42 Upper Jordan, UT (SPK) 35-24, 35-38 Upper Mississippi River Environmental Management Program (MVS) 14-6 Upper Mississippi River - Illinois Navigation Study (MVR) 15-4, 15-9, 15-12 Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program (UMRS-EMP), IL, IA, MN, MO, WI (MVR) 15-4, 15-9 Upper Mississippi River System Environmental 'Management Program (UMRS-EMP)(MVP) 16-3 V Van Bibber Creek, CO (MWO) 26-9, 26-20, 26-27 Ventura Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-5, 33-14, 33-22, 33-32 Vermilion Harbor, OH (LRB) 20-11, 20-20, 20-35 Village Creek, Birmingham, AL (SAM) 10-21, 10-32, 10-42 Virginia Beach, VA (Hurricane Protection) (NAO) 5-10, 5-17 Virginia Beach, VA (Reimbursement) (NAO) 5-10, 5-18 W W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, NC (SAW) 6-17, 6-26 Wabash River, New Harmony, IN (LRL) 24-6, 24-17, 24-36, 24-39 Wabash River Basin (LRL) 24-13, 24-22, 24-34 Waco Lake, TX (SWF) 39-11, 39-17, 39-21 Waco Lake, TX (Safety Dam) (SWF) 39-11, 39-17, 39-21 Wallisville Lake, TX (SWG) 40-10 Walnut Creek, CA (SPK) 35-25, 35-38 Walter F. George Lock and Dam, AL & GA (SAM) 10-25, 10-33, 10-49 Washington Aqueduct (NAB) 4-25 Washington Harbor, DC (NAB) 4-10, 4-29, 4-38 Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-9, 6-24, 6-29 Waterway Connecting Swanquarter Bay with Deep Bay, NC (SAW) 6-10, 6-24 Waterway from Indian River Inlet to Rehobeth Bay, DE (NAP) 3-10, 3-20, 3-28 Waterway on the Coast of VA (NAO) 5-9, 5-14, 5-17 Waukegan Harbor, IL (LRC) 22-7, 22-16, 22-22, 22-25 Waurika Lake, OK (SWT) 38-11, 38-21, 38-26 Waveland Seawall, Waveland, MS (SAM) 10-21, 10-32, 10-42 Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, OK (SWT) 38-14, 38-23, 38-26 Wehrspann Lake Aquatic (NWO) 26-12, 26-22, 26-27 West Agurs, LA, Levee (MVK) 12-8 West Bank of the Mississippi River, Vicinity of New Orleans, LA (MVN) 11-8, 11-14 West Branch of Susquehanna River, PA (NAB) 4-21, 4-40 West Columbus, OH (LRH) 25-10, 25-15, 25-19 West Des Moines, IA (MVR) 5-7, 5-10, 5-14 West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH (LRL) 24-13, 24-19, 24-26, 24-33 West Harbor, OH (LRB) 20-11, 20-20, 20-35 West Hill Dam, MA (NAE) 1-10, 1-26 West Point Lake, Chattahoochee River Basin, AL & GA (SAM) 10-25, 10-33, 10-43 West Sacramento, CA (SPK) 35-26, 35-38 West Thompson Lake, CT (NAE) 1-19, 1-30 West Virginia and Pennsylvania Flood Control (LRP) 18-6 Westville Lake, MA (NAE) 1-20, 1-30 White Lake Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-40, 21-74, 21-91 White River Basin (Little Rock District, AR & MO) (SWL) 37-9, 37-18, 37-22, 37-30 White River, Batesville, AR (SWL) 37-9, 37-19, 37-23 White River, IN (LRL) 24-6, 24-17, 24-23, 24-39 White River, Jacksonport, AR (SWL) 37-10, 37-19, 37-23, 37-25 Whitewater River Basin Floodwarning System, SAC Bernardino, CA (SPL) 33-10, 33-17, 33-30 Whitlow Ranch Dam, Queen Creek, AZ (SPL) 33-10, 33-16, 33-26 Whitney Lake, TX (SWF) 39-13, 39-35 Whitney Point Lake, NY (NAB) 4-20, 4-32 Whitney Point Village, NY (NAB) 4-20, 4-32 I-22 Wicomico River, MD (NAB) 4-11, 4-28, 4-37 Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA, (SPK) 35-26, 35-39 Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR (NWP) 28-9, 28-27, 28-35, 28-37, 28-41, 28-42 Willamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR (NWP) 28-15, 28-28, 28-36 Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, WA (NWS) 29-8, 29-18, 29-24 William H. Harsha Lake, OH (LRL) 24-14, 24-19, 24-33 Willow Creek Lake, Heppner, OR (NWP) 28-15, 28-29, 28-36 Wilmington Harbor, DE (NAP) 3-10, 3-21, 3-28 Wilmington Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-10, 6-24 Wilson Harbor, NY (LRB) 20-11, 20-18, 20-32 Winfield, KS (SWT) 38-11, 38-21, 38-26 Wister Lake, OK (SWT) 38-11, 38-21, 38-26, 38-28 Wolf Creek Dam - Lake Cumberland, Ohio River Basin, KY (LRN) 23-8, 23-10 Woodcock Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (LRP) 18-12, 18-17, 18-23 Woodmont Beach, Milford, CT (NAE) 1-9, 1-26, 1-34 Work Under Special Authorization (SWF) 39-12, 39-25 Wrangell Harbor, AK (POA) 32-6, 32-11, 32-15 Wright Patman Dam and Lake, TX (SWF) 39-11, 39-17, 39-22 Wrightsville Beach, NC (SAW) 6-16, 6-26 Wyoming Valley, PA (Levee Raising) (NAB) 4-22, 4-33, 4-40 Y Yadkin River Basin, NC and SC (SAW) 6-17 Yaquina Bay and Harbor, OR (NWP) 28-9, 28-27, 28-35 Yaquina River, OR (NWP) 28-10, 28-27, 28-35, 28-42 Yatesville Lake, KY (LRH) 25-10, 25-15, 25-19 York, Indian Rock Dam, PA (NAB) 4-23, 4-33, 4-40 Youghiogheny River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA and MD (LRP) 18-13, 18-17, 18-23 York River, VA (NAO) 5-9, 5-14 Z No entries I-23 3 Y COS0 381001